e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
for the transition period from
to |
Commission File No. 1-13146
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Oregon
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
93-0816972
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
One Centerpointe Drive, Suite 200, Lake Oswego, OR 97035
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code) |
(503) 684-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act)
Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrants common stock, without par value, outstanding on June 28,
2011 was 25,158,700 shares.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Forward-Looking Statements
From time to time, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Greenbrier or the Company)
or their representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limitation, statements as to expectations, beliefs and
strategies regarding the future. Such forward-looking statements may be included in, but not
limited to, press releases, oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive
officer or in various filings made by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including
this filing on Form 10-Q. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements rely on a number of assumptions
concerning future events and include statements relating to:
|
|
|
availability of financing sources and borrowing base for working capital, other business
development activities, capital spending and leased railcars for syndication; |
|
|
|
ability to renew, maintain or obtain sufficient lines of credit and performance
guarantees on acceptable terms; |
|
|
|
ability to utilize beneficial tax strategies; |
|
|
|
ability to grow our wheel services, refurbishment and parts, and lease fleet and
management services businesses; |
|
|
|
ability to obtain sales contracts which provide adequate protection against increased
costs of materials and components; |
|
|
|
ability to obtain adequate insurance coverage at acceptable rates; |
|
|
|
ability to obtain adequate certification and licensing of products; and |
|
|
|
short- and long-term revenue and earnings effects of the above items. |
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially
from the forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
fluctuations in demand for newly manufactured railcars or marine barges; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in demand for wheel services, refurbishment and parts; |
|
|
|
delays in receipt of orders, risks that contracts may be canceled during their term or
not renewed and that customers may not purchase the amount of products or services under
the contracts as anticipated; |
|
|
|
ability to maintain sufficient availability of credit facilities and to maintain
compliance with or to obtain appropriate amendments to covenants under various credit
agreements; |
|
|
|
domestic and global economic conditions including such matters as embargoes or quotas; |
|
|
|
U.S., Mexican and other global political or security conditions including such matters
as terrorism, war, civil disruption and crime; |
|
|
|
growth or reduction in the surface transportation industry; |
|
|
|
ability to maintain good relationships with third party labor providers or collective
bargaining units; |
|
|
|
steel and specialty component price fluctuations and availability, scrap surcharges,
steel scrap prices and other commodity price fluctuations and availability and their impact
on product demand and margin; |
|
|
|
delay or failure of acquired businesses, assets, start-up operations, or new products or
services to compete successfully; |
|
|
|
changes in product mix and the mix of revenue levels among reporting segments; |
|
|
|
labor disputes, energy shortages or operating difficulties that might disrupt operations
or the flow of cargo; |
|
|
|
production difficulties and product delivery delays as a result of, among other matters,
changing technologies or non-performance of alliance partners, subcontractors or suppliers; |
|
|
|
ability to renew or replace expiring customer contracts on satisfactory terms; |
|
|
|
ability to obtain and execute suitable contracts for leased railcars for syndication; |
|
|
|
lower than anticipated lease renewal rates, earnings on utilization based leases or
residual values for leased equipment; |
|
|
|
discovery of defects in railcars resulting in increased warranty costs or litigation; |
|
|
|
resolution or outcome of pending or future litigation and investigations; |
|
|
|
natural disasters or severe weather patterns that may affect either us, our suppliers or
our customers; |
2
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
|
|
|
loss of business from, or a decline in the financial condition of, any of the principal
customers that represent a significant portion of our total revenues; |
|
|
|
competitive factors, including introduction of competitive products, new entrants into
certain of our markets, price pressures, limited customer base, and competitiveness of our
manufacturing facilities and products; |
|
|
|
industry overcapacity and our manufacturing capacity utilization; |
|
|
|
decreases or write-downs in carrying value of inventory, goodwill, intangibles or other
assets due to impairment; |
|
|
|
severance or other costs or charges associated with lay-offs, shutdowns, or reducing the
size and scope of operations; |
|
|
|
changes in future maintenance or warranty requirements; |
|
|
|
ability to adjust to the cyclical nature of the industries in which we operate; |
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and financial impacts from interest rates; |
|
|
|
ability and cost to maintain and renew operating permits; |
|
|
|
actions by various regulatory agencies; |
|
|
|
changes in fuel and/or energy prices; |
|
|
|
risks associated with our intellectual property rights or those of third parties,
including infringement, maintenance, protection, validity, enforcement and continued use of
such rights; |
|
|
|
expansion of warranty and product support terms beyond those which have traditionally
prevailed in the rail supply industry; |
|
|
|
availability of a trained work force and availability and/or price of essential raw
materials, specialties or components, including steel castings, to permit manufacture of
units on order; |
|
|
|
failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses; |
|
|
|
discovery of previously unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses; |
|
|
|
failure of or delay in implementing and using new software or other technologies; |
|
|
|
ability to replace maturing lease and management services revenue and earnings with
revenue and earnings from new commercial transactions, including new railcar leases,
additions to the lease fleet and new management services contracts; |
|
|
|
credit limitations upon our ability to maintain effective hedging programs; and |
|
|
|
financial impacts from currency fluctuations and currency hedging activities in our
worldwide operations. |
Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of these factors. Words such as
anticipates, believes, forecast, potential, goal, contemplates, expects, intends,
plans, projects, hopes, seeks, estimates, could, would, will, may, can,
designed to, foreseeable future and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results
contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Many of the important factors that will determine
these results and values are beyond our ability to control or predict. You are cautioned not to put
undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise required by law, we do not
assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
All references to years refer to the fiscal years ended August 31st unless otherwise
noted.
3
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
34,302 |
|
|
$ |
98,864 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
|
2,525 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
143,491 |
|
|
|
89,252 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
289,740 |
|
|
|
204,626 |
|
Leased railcars for syndication |
|
|
58,316 |
|
|
|
12,804 |
|
Equipment on operating leases, net |
|
|
314,106 |
|
|
|
302,663 |
|
Investment in direct finance leases |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
150,091 |
|
|
|
132,614 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
137,066 |
|
|
|
137,066 |
|
Intangibles and other assets, net |
|
|
88,290 |
|
|
|
90,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,217,742 |
|
|
$ |
1,072,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving notes |
|
$ |
13,897 |
|
|
$ |
2,630 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
261,361 |
|
|
|
181,638 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
75,860 |
|
|
|
81,136 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
5,821 |
|
|
|
11,377 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
496,828 |
|
|
|
498,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenbrier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock without par value; 25,000 shares authorized; none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
without par value; 50,000 shares authorized; 25,159 and 21,875 shares outstanding at
May 31, 2011 and August 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
240,173 |
|
|
|
172,426 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
114,547 |
|
|
|
120,716 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(3,264 |
) |
|
|
(7,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity Greenbrier |
|
|
351,456 |
|
|
|
285,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
12,519 |
|
|
|
11,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
363,975 |
|
|
|
297,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,217,742 |
|
|
$ |
1,072,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
173,487 |
|
|
$ |
77,877 |
|
|
$ |
415,548 |
|
|
$ |
226,020 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts |
|
|
126,317 |
|
|
|
111,242 |
|
|
|
333,600 |
|
|
|
297,870 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
17,476 |
|
|
|
18,312 |
|
|
|
51,406 |
|
|
|
53,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317,280 |
|
|
|
207,431 |
|
|
|
800,554 |
|
|
|
577,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
158,674 |
|
|
|
68,931 |
|
|
|
385,974 |
|
|
|
206,386 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts |
|
|
111,202 |
|
|
|
96,725 |
|
|
|
299,026 |
|
|
|
263,398 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
|
9,931 |
|
|
|
27,099 |
|
|
|
31,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,130 |
|
|
|
175,587 |
|
|
|
712,099 |
|
|
|
501,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
|
38,150 |
|
|
|
31,844 |
|
|
|
88,455 |
|
|
|
76,018 |
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
22,580 |
|
|
|
17,519 |
|
|
|
58,212 |
|
|
|
50,686 |
|
Gain on disposition of equipment |
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
(4,024 |
) |
|
|
(6,148 |
) |
|
|
(5,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
17,248 |
|
|
|
18,349 |
|
|
|
36,391 |
|
|
|
30,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
|
9,807 |
|
|
|
10,811 |
|
|
|
30,646 |
|
|
|
34,328 |
|
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and
loss from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(2,566 |
) |
|
|
8,813 |
|
|
|
(4,262 |
) |
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before loss from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(2,265 |
) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
|
|
(1,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
|
(632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
(2,804 |
) |
|
|
6,077 |
|
|
|
(5,150 |
) |
|
|
(1,669 |
) |
Net earnings attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
(1,514 |
) |
|
|
(1,019 |
) |
|
|
(1,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to
Greenbrier |
|
$ |
(3,314 |
) |
|
$ |
4,563 |
|
|
$ |
(6,169 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
24,127 |
|
|
|
18,220 |
|
|
|
22,893 |
|
|
|
17,477 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,127 |
|
|
|
20,058 |
|
|
|
22,893 |
|
|
|
17,477 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to Greenbrier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
Attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance September 1, 2010 |
|
|
21,875 |
|
|
$ |
172,426 |
|
|
$ |
120,716 |
|
|
$ |
(7,204 |
) |
|
$ |
11,469 |
|
|
$ |
297,407 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
(5,150 |
) |
Translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,521 |
|
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments recognized
in net loss (net of tax effect) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215 |
) |
Unrealized gain on derivative
financial instruments (net of
tax effect) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
Noncontrolling interest adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Net proceeds from equity offering |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
62,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,760 |
|
Restricted stock awards (net of
cancellations) |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
6,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,593 |
|
Unamortized restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,593 |
) |
Restricted stock amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,961 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance May 31, 2011 |
|
|
25,159 |
|
|
|
240,173 |
|
|
$ |
114,547 |
|
|
$ |
(3,264 |
) |
|
$ |
12,519 |
|
|
$ |
363,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to Greenbrier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
Attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance September 1, 2009 |
|
|
17,094 |
|
|
$ |
117,077 |
|
|
$ |
116,439 |
|
|
$ |
(9,790 |
) |
|
$ |
8,724 |
|
|
$ |
232,450 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
(1,669 |
) |
Translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments recognized in
net loss (net of tax effect) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
Unrealized gain on derivative
financial instruments (net of tax
effect) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,802 |
) |
Noncontrolling interest adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
Debt discount adjustment for partial
convertible note retirement (net of
tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,080 |
) |
Net proceeds from equity offering |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
52,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,725 |
|
Restricted stock awards (net of
cancellations) |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
3,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,178 |
|
Unamortized restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,178 |
) |
Restricted stock amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
Excess tax expense of stock options
exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance May 31, 2010 |
|
|
21,872 |
|
|
$ |
171,628 |
|
|
$ |
113,006 |
|
|
$ |
(11,923 |
) |
|
$ |
9,179 |
|
|
$ |
281,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,150 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,669 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(5,276 |
) |
|
|
17,084 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28,174 |
|
|
|
27,967 |
|
Gain on sales of leased equipment |
|
|
(2,901 |
) |
|
|
(4,032 |
) |
Accretion of debt discount |
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
6,701 |
|
Stock based compensation expense |
|
|
4,961 |
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt (non-cash portion) |
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
Other |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(1,467 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(51,427 |
) |
|
|
(1,615 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(83,293 |
) |
|
|
(27,195 |
) |
Leased railcars for syndication |
|
|
(48,465 |
) |
|
|
10,504 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,834 |
|
|
|
3,428 |
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
77,273 |
|
|
|
11,352 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(5,442 |
) |
|
|
(7,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(77,307 |
) |
|
|
36,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments received under direct finance leases |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
Proceeds from sales of equipment |
|
|
14,179 |
|
|
|
14,794 |
|
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(979 |
) |
|
|
(650 |
) |
Contract placement fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,050 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(632 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(59,689 |
) |
|
|
(28,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(46,129 |
) |
|
|
(20,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in revolving notes with maturities of 90 days or less |
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
(7,828 |
) |
Proceeds from revolving notes with maturities longer than 90 days |
|
|
13,373 |
|
|
|
5,698 |
|
Repayments of revolving notes with maturities longer than 90 days |
|
|
(6,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
231,250 |
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(7,857 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Repayments of notes payable |
|
|
(238,569 |
) |
|
|
(28,357 |
) |
Gross proceeds from equity offering |
|
|
63,180 |
|
|
|
56,250 |
|
Expenses from equity offering |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
Other |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
58,483 |
|
|
|
23,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(64,562 |
) |
|
|
40,408 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
98,864 |
|
|
|
76,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
34,302 |
|
|
$ |
116,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
25,850 |
|
|
$ |
27,580 |
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
$ |
866 |
|
|
$ |
(13,943 |
) |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
7
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Interim Financial Statements
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Greenbrier or the Company) as of May 31, 2011 and for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2011
and 2010 have been prepared without audit and reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of
the financial position and operating results and cash flows for the periods indicated. The results
of operations for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of
the results to be expected for the entire year ending August 31, 2011.
Certain notes and other information have been condensed or omitted from the interim financial
statements presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Therefore, these financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Companys
2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Management estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires judgment on the part of management to
arrive at estimates and assumptions on matters that are inherently uncertain. These estimates may
affect the amount of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses reported in the financial statements
and accompanying notes and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities within the financial
statements. Estimates and assumptions are periodically evaluated and may be adjusted in future
periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to the accompanying prior period
Consolidated Financial Statements to conform to the 2011 presentation. The effect of such
reclassifications on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of August 31, 2010 was to increase
Inventories by $19.0 million (from $185.6 million as previously reported to $204.6 million) and to
reduce Assets held for sale by $19.0 million (from $31.8 million as previously reported to $12.8
million). The Assets held for sale caption, after such reclassification, has been re-titled
Leased railcars for syndication. For the Consolidated Statements of Operations, ,the gain on
extinguishment of debt ($1.3 million for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2010) previously
included within the line item Interest and foreign exchange has been reclassified to a separate
line item captioned Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt.
Change in Presentation to Prior Year Financial Statements Historically, the Company has reported
Gain on disposition of leased equipment as a net amount in Revenue. Based on discussions with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company has changed its financial statement presentation to
now report these amounts as a separate line item captioned Gain on disposition of equipment,
which is a component of operating income below margin. This change in presentation resulted in a
decrease in Revenue and corresponding increase in Gain on disposition of equipment of $4.0 million
for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and of $5.7 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010
Such change in presentation did not result in any change to Net earnings (loss) attributable to
Greenbrier.
Initial Adoption of Accounting Policies In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 167, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) which provides guidance with respect to consolidation of variable interest
entities. This statement retains the scope of Interpretation 46(R) with the addition of entities
previously considered qualifying special-purpose entities, as the concept of these entities was
eliminated in SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This statement replaces
the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity. The approach focuses on identifying which enterprise has the power to
direct activities that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and the
obligation to absorb the losses or receive the benefits from the entity. It is possible that
application of this revised guidance will change an enterprises assessment of involvement with
variable interest entities. This statement, which has been codified within Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 810, Consolidations, was effective for the Company as of September 1, 2010. The
initial adoption did not have an effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Prospective Accounting Changes In June 2011, an accounting standard update was issued regarding
the presentation of other comprehensive income in the financial statements. The standard eliminated
the option of presenting other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in equity
and instead requires the Company to present other comprehensive income as either a single statement
of comprehensive income combine with net income or as two separate but continuous statements. This
amendment will be effective for the Company as of September 1, 2012. The Company currently reports
other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
and will be required to update the presentation of comprehensive income to be in compliance with
the new standard.
Note 2 Loss (Gain) on Extinguishment of Debt
The results of operations for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2011 include a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $10.0 million associated with the write-off of unamortized debt
acquisition costs of $2.9 million and prepayment premiums and other costs of $7.1 million due to
the full retirement of the $235.0 million senior unsecured notes during the third quarter.
The results of operations for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2010 include a gain on
extinguishment of debt of $1.3 million. This includes a $2.3 million gain on extinguishment of debt
associated with the early retirement of $22.2 million of convertible senior notes which was offset
by $1.0 million for the proportionate write-off of loan fees and debt discount related to the early
repayments on the convertible note and certain term loans.
Note 3 Inventories
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2011 |
|
|
August 31, 2010 |
|
Supplies and raw materials |
|
$ |
178,436 |
|
|
$ |
119,306 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
90,286 |
|
|
|
70,394 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
25,189 |
|
|
|
19,022 |
|
Lower of cost or market adjustment |
|
|
(4,171 |
) |
|
|
(4,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
289,740 |
|
|
$ |
204,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Leased Railcars for Syndication
Leased railcars for syndication consist of newly-built railcars, manufactured by one of the
Companys facilities, which have been placed on lease to a customer and which the Company intends
to sell to an investor with the lease attached. These railcars are not depreciated and are
anticipated to be sold within six months of delivery of the last railcar on the underlying lease.
The Company does not believe any economic value of a railcar is lost in the first six months;
therefore the Company does not depreciate these assets. In the event the railcars are not sold, the
railcars are transferred to Equipment on operating leases and depreciated. As of May 31, 2011
Leased railcars for syndication were $58.3 million compared to $12.8 million as of August 31, 2010.
9
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Note 5 Intangibles and other assets
Intangible assets that are determined to have finite lives are amortized over their useful lives.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized and are periodically evaluated for
impairment.
The following table summarizes the Companys identifiable intangible assets balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
66,825 |
|
|
$ |
66,825 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(16,816 |
) |
|
|
(13,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
5,274 |
|
|
|
5,003 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(3,382 |
) |
|
|
(2,845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,901 |
|
|
|
55,282 |
|
Intangible assets not subject to
amortization |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
Prepaid and other assets |
|
|
35,477 |
|
|
|
34,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible and other assets |
|
$ |
88,290 |
|
|
$ |
90,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized using the straight line method over their
estimated useful lives and include the following: proprietary technology, 10 years; trade names, 5
years; patents, 11 years; and long-term customer agreements and relationships, 5 to 20 years.
Amortization expense for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2011 was $1.2 million and $3.6
million and for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2010 was $1.2 million and $3.6 million.
Amortization expense for the years ending August 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 is expected to
be $4.7 million, $4.5 million, $4.4 million, $4.3 million and $4.3 million.
Note 6 Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates
In April 2010, WLRGreenbrier Rail Inc. (WLR-GBX) was formed and acquired a lease fleet of nearly
4,000 railcars valued at approximately $230.0 million. WLR-GBX is wholly owned LLC by affiliates of
WL Ross & Co., LLC (WL Ross). The Company paid a $6.1 million contract placement fee to WLR-GBX for
the right to perform certain management and advisory services and in exchange will receive
management and other fee income and incentive compensation tied to the performance of WLR-GBX. The
contract placement fee is accounted for under the equity method and is recorded in Intangibles and
other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. While the Company acts as asset manager to WLR-GBX,
it is not the primary beneficiary. The Company has no authority to make decisions regarding key
business activities that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance, such as asset
re-marketing and disposition activities, which requires the approval of affiliates of WL Ross.
Summarized financial data for WLR-GBX:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
6,643 |
|
|
$ |
2,939 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
252,645 |
|
|
$ |
255,889 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
5,209 |
|
|
$ |
2,659 |
|
Equity |
|
$ |
17,511 |
|
|
$ |
17,441 |
|
10
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
12,922 |
|
|
$ |
1,613 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,542 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,794 |
) |
In June 2003, the Company acquired a 33% minority ownership interest in Ohio Castings LLC, a joint
venture which produces castings for freight cars. This joint venture is accounted for under the
equity method and the investment is included in Intangibles and other assets on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The facility had been idled but has re-opened during the third quarter of fiscal
2011. The Company, along with the other partners, has made additional investments during fiscal
year 2011, the Companys share of which was $0.9 million. Additional investments may be required.
Summarized financial data for the castings joint venture is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
3,132 |
|
|
$ |
2,455 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,968 |
|
|
$ |
14,205 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
1,175 |
|
|
$ |
1,535 |
|
Equity |
|
$ |
11,311 |
|
|
$ |
11,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,072 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,043 |
) |
Note 7 Revolving Notes
All amounts originating in foreign currency have been translated at the May 31, 2011 exchange rate
for the following discussion. As of May 31, 2011 senior secured credit facilities, consisting of
three components, aggregated $130.0 million. As of May 31, 2011 a $100.0 million revolving line of
credit secured by substantially all the Companys assets in the United States not otherwise pledged
as security for term loans, maturing November 2011, was available to provide working capital and
interim financing of equipment, principally for the United States and Mexican operations. Advances
under this facility bear interest at variable rates that depend on the type of borrowing and the
defined ratio of debt to total capitalization. Available borrowings under the credit facility are
generally based on defined levels of inventory, receivables, property, plant and equipment and
leased equipment, as well as total debt to consolidated capitalization and interest coverage
ratios. In addition, as of May 31, 2011, lines of credit totaling $20.0 million secured by certain
of the Companys European assets, with various variable rates, were available for working capital
needs of the European manufacturing operation. European credit facilities are continually being
renewed. Currently these European credit facilities have maturities that range from April 2012
through December 2012. In addition, the Companys Mexican joint venture has a line of credit of up
to $10.0 million secured by certain of the joint ventures accounts receivable and inventory.
Advances under this facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% and are due 180 days after the date
of borrowing. Currently the outstanding advances have maturities that range from July 2011 to
November 2011. The Mexican joint venture will be able to draw against the facility through August
2011.
As of May 31, 2011 outstanding borrowings under these facilities consists of $3.9 million in
letters of credit outstanding under the North American credit facility, $6.7 million outstanding
under the European credit facilities and $7.2 million outstanding under the Mexican joint venture
credit facility.
11
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Subsequent to quarter end, Greenbrier entered into a five-year $245.0 million revolving line of
credit, maturing June 30, 2016. The facility is secured by substantially all of the Companys
assets in the United States not otherwise pledged as security for term loans. This replaces the
$100.0 million revolving line of credit maturing November 2011. See Note 20 Subsequent Events.
Note 8 Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Trade payables and other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
218,593 |
|
|
$ |
141,767 |
|
Accrued payroll and related liabilities |
|
|
22,816 |
|
|
|
19,025 |
|
Accrued maintenance |
|
|
10,335 |
|
|
|
12,460 |
|
Accrued warranty |
|
|
7,027 |
|
|
|
6,304 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
261,361 |
|
|
$ |
181,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 Warranty Accruals
Warranty costs are estimated and charged to operations to cover a defined warranty period. The
estimated warranty cost is based on the history of warranty claims for each particular product
type. For new product types without a warranty history, preliminary estimates are based on
historical information for similar product types. The warranty accruals, included in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are reviewed periodically and
updated based on warranty trends and expirations of warranty periods.
Warranty accrual activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
6,381 |
|
|
$ |
7,480 |
|
|
$ |
6,304 |
|
|
$ |
8,184 |
|
Charged to cost of revenue |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
Currency translation effect |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
7,027 |
|
|
$ |
6,921 |
|
|
$ |
7,027 |
|
|
$ |
6,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Notes Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Convertible senior notes, due 2018 |
|
$ |
230,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Convertible senior notes, due 2026 |
|
|
67,724 |
|
|
|
67,724 |
|
Term loans |
|
|
209,765 |
|
|
|
212,019 |
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
Other notes payable |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,600 |
|
|
|
514,919 |
|
Debt discount net of amortization |
|
|
(10,772 |
) |
|
|
(16,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
496,828 |
|
|
$ |
498,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes, due 2018, bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.5%, paid semi-annually in
arrears on April 1st and October 1st. The convertible notes will mature on
April 1, 2018, unless earlier repurchased by Greenbrier or
12
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
converted in accordance with their terms
prior to such date. The convertible notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with
other senior unsecured debt. The convertible notes are convertible into shares of the Companys
common stock, at an initial conversion rate of 26.2838 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the
notes (which is equal to an initial conversion price of $38.05 per share). The initial conversion
rate and conversion price are subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, such as
distributions, dividends or stock splits. There were $7.9 million in debt issuance costs, included
in Intangibles and other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, which will be amortized using
the effective interest method. The amortization expense is being included in Interest and foreign
exchange on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Convertible senior notes, due 2026, bear interest at a fixed rate of 2⅜%, paid semi-annually in
arrears on May 15th and November 15th. The Company will also pay contingent
interest of ⅜% on the notes in certain circumstances commencing with the six-month period beginning
May 15, 2013. On or after May 15, 2013, Greenbrier may redeem all or a portion of the notes at a
redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid
interest. On May 15, 2013, May 15, 2016 and May 15, 2021 or in the event of certain fundamental
changes, holders may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of their notes at a price
equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest. Payment on the
convertible notes is guaranteed by substantially all of the Companys material domestic
subsidiaries. The convertible senior notes are convertible upon the occurrence of specified events
into cash and shares, if any, of Greenbriers common stock at an initial conversion rate of 20.8125
shares per $1,000 principal amount of the notes (which is equal to an initial conversion price of
$48.05 per share). The initial conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of
certain events, as defined. The debt discount associated with the convertible senior notes is being
accreted using the effective interest rate method through May 2013 and the accretion expense is
being included in Interest and foreign exchange on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
pre-tax accretion of the debt discount was $0.8 million and $2.2 million for the three and nine
months ended May 31, 2011 and is expected to be approximately $3.0 million for the year ending
August 31, 2011, $3.3 million for the year ending August 31, 2012 and $2.5 million for the year
ending August 31, 2013.
Term loans are primarily comprised of:
|
|
|
A senior term note with an initial balance of $100.0 million, secured by a pool of
leased railcars, maturing in March 2014. The note bears a floating interest rate of LIBOR
plus 1% with principal of $0.7 million paid quarterly in arrears and a balloon payment of
$81.8 million due at maturity. An interest rate swap agreement was entered into, on fifty
percent of the initial balance, to swap the floating interest rate of LIBOR plus 1% to a
fixed rate of 4.24%. At May 31, 2011, the notional amount of the agreement was $44.6
million and matures in March 2014. |
|
|
|
|
A senior term note with an initial balance of $50.0 million, secured by a pool of leased
railcars, maturing in May 2015. The note bears a floating interest rate of LIBOR plus 1%
with principal of $0.3 million paid quarterly in arrears and a balloon payment of $41.2
million due at maturity. |
|
|
|
|
A term loan with an initial balance of $75.0 million, principally secured by all of a
subsidiarys assets, maturing in June 2012. The loan contains no financial covenants, is
non-amortizing and requires mandatory prepayments under certain circumstances. The balance
as of May 31, 2011 was $71.8 million and has a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.5%
paid quarterly in arrears with a balloon payment due at maturity. In connection with the
loan, the Company has outstanding warrants to purchase 3.401 million shares of its common
stock at $5.96 per share, both subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The warrants
have a five-year term which expires June 2014. The warrants were valued at $13.4 million,
and recorded as a debt discount (reducing Notes payable) and Additional paid-in capital
(increasing Stockholders equity Greenbrier) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. This debt
discount will be amortized and recorded as Interest and foreign exchange in the Statements
of Operations over the life of the loan. The amortization of the debt discount was $1.1
million and $3.2 million for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2011. Subsequent to
quarter end, this term loan was repaid in full. See Note 20 Subsequent Events. In
conjunction with the repayment, the remaining debt discount of $3.9 million was written off
to Loss on extinguishment of debt. |
During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company retired the full $235.0 million of senior
unsecured notes and recorded $10.0 million as Loss on extinguishment of debt for the write-off of unamortized debt
acquisition costs and prepayment premiums.
13
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The revolving and operating lines of credit, along with notes payable, contain covenants with
respect to the Company and various subsidiaries, the most restrictive of which, among other things,
limit the ability to: incur additional indebtedness or guarantees; pay dividends or repurchase
stock; enter into sale leaseback transactions; create liens; sell assets; engage in transactions
with affiliates, including joint ventures and non U.S. subsidiaries, including but not limited to
loans, advances, equity investments and guarantees; enter into mergers, consolidations or sales of
substantially all the Companys assets; and enter into new lines of business. The covenants also
require certain maximum ratios of debt to total capitalization and minimum levels of fixed charges
(interest and rent) coverage.
Principal payments on the notes payable are as follows:
(In thousands)
Year ending August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011 (Remaining three months) |
|
$ |
1,041 |
|
2012 |
|
|
77,565 |
|
2013 |
|
|
72,215 |
|
2014 |
|
|
84,707 |
|
2015 |
|
|
41,931 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
230,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
507,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 Equity
On December 16, 2010, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of its common stock in an underwritten
at-the-market public offering at $21.06 per share, less expenses resulting in net proceeds of $62.8
million.
On May 12, 2010, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $12.50 per
share, less underwriting commissions, discounts and expenses. On May 19, 2010, an additional
500,000 shares were issued pursuant to the 30-day over-allotment option exercised by the
underwriters. The combined issuance resulted in net proceeds of $52.7 million.
Note 12 Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The shares used in the computation of the Companys basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common
share attributable to Greenbrier are reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding (1) |
|
|
24,127 |
|
|
|
18,220 |
|
|
|
22,893 |
|
|
|
17,477 |
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock options (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of warrants-treasury stock method (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of convertible notes (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
24,127 |
|
|
|
20,058 |
|
|
|
22,893 |
|
|
|
17,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes 0.8 million shares of unvested restricted stock for the three and nine
months ended May 31, 2011 due to net loss. |
|
(2) |
|
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents is excluded from per share calculations for
the three and nine months ended May 31, 2011 and nine months ended May 31, 2010 due to net
loss. The dilutive effect of warrants of 3.4 million shares was excluded from per share
calculations for three months ended May 31, 2011 and nine months ended May 31, 2011 and
2010 due to net loss. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes dilutive effect of convertible notes of 3.7 million and 1.3 million for the
three and nine months ended May 31, 2011 due to net loss. |
14
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Note 13 Stock Based Compensation
The value of stock awarded under restricted stock grants is amortized as compensation expense over
the vesting period which is generally one to five years. For the three and nine months ended May
31, 2011, $2.4 million and $5.0 million in compensation expense was recorded for restricted stock
grants. For the three and nine months ended May 31, 2010, $1.5 million and $4.3 million in
compensation expense was recorded for restricted stock grants.
Note 14 Derivative Instruments
Foreign operations give rise to market risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts with established financial institutions are utilized to
hedge a portion of that risk in Pound Sterling and Euro. Interest rate swap agreements are utilized
to reduce the impact of changes in interest rates on certain debt. The Companys foreign currency
forward exchange contracts and interest rate swap agreements are designated as cash flow hedges,
and therefore the effective portion of unrealized gains and losses are recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive loss.
At May 31, 2011 exchange rates, forward exchange contracts for the purchase of Polish Zloty and the
sale of Euros aggregated $78.7 million. Adjusting the foreign currency exchange contracts to the
fair value of the cash flow hedges at May 31, 2011 resulted in an unrealized pre-tax gain of $114
thousand that was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The fair value of the contracts
is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities when there is a loss, or accounts
receivable when there is a gain, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As the contracts mature at
various dates through July 2012, any such gain or loss remaining will be recognized in
manufacturing revenue along with the related transactions. In the event that the underlying sales
transaction does not occur or does not occur in the period designated at the inception of the
hedge, the amount classified in accumulated other comprehensive loss would be reclassified to the
current years results of operations in Interest and foreign exchange.
At May 31, 2011, an interest rate swap agreement had a notional amount of $44.6 million and matures
March 2014. The fair value of this cash flow hedge at May 31, 2011 resulted in an unrealized
pre-tax loss of $4.3 million. The loss is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss and the
fair value of the contract is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. As interest expense on the underlying debt is recognized, amounts
corresponding to the interest rate swap are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
and charged or credited to interest expense. At May 31, 2011 interest rates, approximately $1.3
million would be reclassified to interest expense in the next 12 months.
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign forward
exchange contracts |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate swap contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
5,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
5,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign forward
exchange contracts |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
15
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in cash flow hedging |
|
Location of loss recognized in income on |
|
|
Loss recognized in income on derivative |
|
relationships |
|
derivative |
|
|
Nine months ended May 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign forward exchange contract |
|
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
(387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) |
|
|
Location of gain (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of loss in |
|
|
Loss recognized on derivative |
|
|
|
recognized in OCI(1) |
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
Gain (loss) reclassified from |
|
|
income on derivative |
|
|
(ineffective portion and amount |
|
Derivatives in cash |
|
on derivatives |
|
|
accumulated |
|
|
accumulated OCI(1) |
|
|
(ineffective portion and |
|
|
excluded from effectiveness |
|
flow hedging |
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
OCI(1) into |
|
|
into income (effective portion) |
|
|
amount excluded from |
|
|
testing) |
|
relationships |
|
Nine months ended May 31, |
|
|
income |
|
|
Nine months ended May 31, |
|
|
effectiveness testing) |
|
|
Nine months ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign forward
exchange contracts |
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
599 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
contracts |
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
|
(1,339 |
) |
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
|
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,666 |
|
|
$ |
(99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(740 |
) |
|
$ |
(983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
Note 15 Segment Information
Greenbrier operates in three reportable segments: Manufacturing, Wheel Services, Refurbishment &
Parts and Leasing & Services. The accounting policies of the segments are described in the summary
of significant accounting policies in the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the
Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Performance is evaluated based on margin. The integrated
business model in which Greenbrier operates, results in selling and administrative costs being
intertwined among the segments. Any allocation of these costs would be subjective and not
meaningful and as a result, Greenbriers management does not allocate these costs for either
external or internal reporting purposes. Intersegment sales and transfers are valued as if the
sales or transfers were to third parties. Related revenue and margin is eliminated in consolidation
and therefore are not included in consolidated results in the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The information in the following table is derived directly from the segments internal financial
reports used for corporate management purposes.
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
198,181 |
|
|
$ |
78,166 |
|
|
$ |
493,751 |
|
|
$ |
226,734 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment &
Parts |
|
|
136,888 |
|
|
|
113,829 |
|
|
|
359,833 |
|
|
|
301,807 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
17,769 |
|
|
|
18,591 |
|
|
|
51,952 |
|
|
|
54,303 |
|
Intersegment eliminations |
|
|
(35,558 |
) |
|
|
(3,155 |
) |
|
|
(104,982 |
) |
|
|
(5,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
317,280 |
|
|
$ |
207,431 |
|
|
$ |
800,554 |
|
|
$ |
577,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Margin: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
14,813 |
|
|
$ |
8,946 |
|
|
$ |
29,574 |
|
|
$ |
19,634 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment &
Parts |
|
|
15,115 |
|
|
|
14,517 |
|
|
|
34,574 |
|
|
|
34,472 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
8,222 |
|
|
|
8,381 |
|
|
|
24,307 |
|
|
|
21,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment margin total |
|
|
38,150 |
|
|
|
31,844 |
|
|
|
88,455 |
|
|
|
76,018 |
|
Less unallocated expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
22,580 |
|
|
|
17,519 |
|
|
|
58,212 |
|
|
|
50,686 |
|
Gain on disposition of
equipment |
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
(4,024 |
) |
|
|
(6,148 |
) |
|
|
(5,659 |
) |
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
|
9,807 |
|
|
|
10,811 |
|
|
|
30,646 |
|
|
|
34,328 |
|
Loss (gain) on extinguishment
of debt |
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
and loss from unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
$ |
(2,566 |
) |
|
$ |
8,813 |
|
|
$ |
(4,262 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16 Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental studies have been conducted of the Companys owned and leased properties that
indicate additional investigation and some remediation on certain properties may be necessary. The
Companys Portland, Oregon manufacturing facility is located adjacent to the Willamette River. The
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified portions of the river bed,
including the portion fronting Greenbriers facility, as a federal National Priority List or
Superfund site due to sediment contamination (the Portland Harbor Site). Greenbrier and more than
140 other parties have received a General Notice of potential liability from the EPA relating to
the Portland Harbor Site. The letter advised the Company that it may be liable for the costs of
investigation and remediation (which liability may be joint and several with other potentially
responsible parties) as well as for natural resource damages resulting from releases of hazardous
substances to the site. At this time, ten private and public entities, including the Company, have
signed an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) to perform a remedial investigation/feasibility
study (RI/FS) of the Portland Harbor Site under EPA oversight, and several additional entities have
not signed such consent, but are nevertheless contributing money to the effort. A draft of the RI
study was submitted on October 27, 2009. The Feasibility Study is being developed and is expected
to be submitted in the fourth calendar quarter of 2011. Eighty-three parties, including the State
of Oregon and the federal government, have entered into a non-judicial mediation process to try to
allocate costs associated with the Portland Harbor site. Approximately 110 additional parties have
signed tolling agreements related to such allocations. On April 23, 2009, the Company and the other
AOC signatories filed suit against 69 other parties due to a possible limitations period for some
such claims; Arkema Inc. et al v. A & C Foundry Products, Inc.et al, US District Court, District of
Oregon, Case #3:09-cv-453-PK. All but 12 of these parties elected to sign tolling agreements and be
dismissed without prejudice, and the case has now been stayed by the court, pending completion of
the RI/FS. In addition, the Company has entered into a Voluntary Clean-Up Agreement with the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality in which the Company agreed to conduct an investigation of
whether, and to what extent, past or present operations at the Portland property may have released
hazardous substances to the environment. The Company is also conducting groundwater remediation
relating to a historical spill on the property which antedates its ownership.
Because these environmental investigations are still underway, the Company is unable to determine
the amount of ultimate liability relating to these matters. Based on the results of the pending
investigations and future assessments of natural resource damages, Greenbrier may be required to
incur costs associated with additional phases of investigation or remedial action, and may be
liable for damages to natural resources. In addition, the Company may be required to perform
periodic maintenance dredging in order to continue to launch vessels from its launch ways in
Portland, Oregon, on the Willamette River, and the rivers classification as a Superfund site could
result in some limitations on future dredging and launch activities. Any of these matters could
adversely affect the Companys business and Consolidated Financial Statements, or the value of its
Portland property.
From time to time, Greenbrier is involved as a defendant in litigation in the ordinary course of
business, the outcome of which cannot be predicted with certainty. The most significant litigation
is as follows:
17
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Greenbriers customer, SEB Finans AB (SEB), has raised performance concerns related to a component
that the Company installed on 372 railcar units with an aggregate sales value of approximately
$20.0 million produced under a contract with SEB. On December 9, 2005, SEB filed a Statement of
Claim in an arbitration proceeding in Stockholm, Sweden, against Greenbrier alleging that the
railcars were defective and could not be used for their intended purpose. A settlement agreement
was entered into effective February 28, 2007 pursuant to which the railcar units previously
delivered were to be repaired and the remaining units completed and delivered to SEB. Greenbrier is
proceeding with repairs of the railcars in accordance with terms of the settlement agreement,
though SEB has recently made additional warranty claims, including claims with respect to railcars
that have been repaired pursuant to the agreement. Greenbrier is evaluating SEBs new warranty
claim. Current estimates of potential costs of such repairs do not exceed amounts accrued.
When the Company acquired the assets of the Freight Wagon Division of DaimlerChrysler in January
2000, it acquired a contract to build 201 freight cars for Okombi GmbH, a subsidiary of Rail Cargo
Austria AG. Subsequently, Okombi made breach of warranty and late delivery claims against the
Company which grew out of design and certification problems. All of these issues were settled as of
March 2004. Additional allegations have been made, the most serious of which involve cracks to the
structure of the freight cars. Okombi has been required to remove all 201 freight cars from
service, and a formal claim has been made against the Company. Legal, technical and commercial
evaluations are on-going to determine what obligations the Company might have, if any, to remedy
the alleged defects.
Management intends to vigorously defend its position in each of the open foregoing cases. While the
ultimate outcome of such legal proceedings cannot be determined at this time, management believes
that the resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company is involved as a defendant in other litigation initiated in the ordinary course of
business. While the ultimate outcome of such legal proceedings cannot be determined at this time,
management believes that the resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on
the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company delivered 500 railcar units during fiscal year 2009 for which the Company has an
obligation to guarantee the purchaser minimum earnings. The obligation expires December 31, 2011.
The maximum potential obligation totaled $13.1 million and in certain defined instances the
obligation may be reduced due to early termination. Upon delivery of the railcar units, the entire
purchase price was recorded as revenue and paid in full. The minimum earnings due to the purchaser
were considered a reduction of revenue and were recorded as deferred revenue. The purchaser has
agreed to utilize the railcars on a preferential basis, and the Company is entitled to re-market
the railcar units when they are not being utilized by the purchaser during the obligation period.
Any earnings generated from the railcar units will offset the obligation and be recognized as
revenue and margin in future periods. As of May 31, 2011, the Company has $4.6 million of the
potential obligation remaining in deferred revenue.
The Company has entered into contingent rental assistance agreements, aggregating up to a maximum
of $5.5 million, on certain railcars subject to leases that have been sold to third parties. These
agreements guarantee the purchasers a minimum lease rental, subject to a maximum defined rental
assistance amount, over remaining periods of up to one year. A liability is established and revenue
is reduced in the period during which a determination can be made that it is probable that a rental
shortfall will occur and the amount can be estimated. For the three and nine months ended May 31,
2011 an accrual of $3 thousand and $8 thousand was recorded to cover future obligations. For the
three and nine months ended May 31, 2010 an accrual of $25 thousand and $0.2 million was made to
cover estimated obligations as management determined no additional rental shortfall was probable.
There was no remaining balance of the accrued liability as May 31, 2011. All of these agreements
were entered into prior to December 31, 2002 and have not been modified since.
In accordance with customary business practices in Europe, the Company has $7.2 million in bank and
third party performance and warranty guarantee facilities, all of which have been utilized as of
May 31, 2011. To date no amounts have been drawn under these performance and warranty guarantee
facilities.
At May 31, 2011, the Mexican joint venture had $8.2 million of third party debt, for which the
Company has guaranteed 50% or approximately $4.1 million.
18
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
As of May 31, 2011 the Company has outstanding letters of credit aggregating $3.9 million
associated with facility leases and payroll.
Note 17 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair values of financial instruments and the methods and assumptions used to estimate
such fair values are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Notes payable as of May 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
496,828 |
|
|
$ |
440,039 |
|
Notes payable as of August 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
498,700 |
|
|
$ |
482,589 |
|
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, revolving notes,
accounts payable and accrued liabilities, foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate
swaps is a reasonable estimate of fair value of these financial instruments. Estimated rates
currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to
estimate the fair value of notes payable.
Note 18 Fair Value Measures
Certain assets and liabilities are reported at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring
basis. Fair value, for this disclosure, is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants, under a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs
used in measuring a fair value as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
observable inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
instruments; |
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
inputs, other than the quoted market prices in active markets for similar instruments,
which are observable,
either directly or indirectly; and |
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data available, which require
the reporting
entity to develop its own assumptions. |
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2011 are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2(1) |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Nonqualified savings plan
investments |
|
|
6,897 |
|
|
|
6,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
14,667 |
|
|
|
14,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,488 |
|
|
$ |
21,564 |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Level 2 assets include derivative financial instruments which are valued based on significant
observable inputs. See Note 11 Derivative Instruments for further discussion. |
19
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of August 31, 2010 are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Nonqualified savings plan
investments |
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
57,300 |
|
|
|
57,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,473 |
|
|
$ |
63,789 |
|
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
5,370 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,370 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Note 19 Guarantor/Non Guarantor
The convertible senior notes due 2026 (the Notes) issued on May 22, 2006 are fully and
unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed by substantially all of Greenbriers material
100% owned United States subsidiaries: Autostack Company LLC, Greenbrier-Concarril, LLC, Greenbrier
Leasing Company LLC, Greenbrier Leasing Limited Partner, LLC, Greenbrier Management Services, LLC,
Greenbrier Leasing, L.P., Greenbrier Railcar LLC, Gunderson LLC, Gunderson Marine LLC, Gunderson
Rail Services LLC, Meridian Rail Holding Corp., Meridian Rail Acquisition Corp., Meridian Rail
Mexico City Corp., Brandon Railroad LLC, Gunderson Specialty Products, LLC and Greenbrier Railcar
Leasing, Inc. No other subsidiaries guarantee the Notes including Greenbrier Leasing Limited,
Greenbrier Europe B.V., Greenbrier Germany GmbH, WagonySwidnica S.A., Gunderson-Concarril, S.A. de
C.V., Mexico Meridian Rail Services, S.A. de C.V., Greenbrier Railcar Services Tierra Blanca
S.A. de C.V., YSD Doors, S.A. de C.V., Greenbrier-Gimsa, LLC and Gunderson-Gimsa S de RL de C.V.
The following represents the supplemental condensed consolidating financial information of
Greenbrier and its guarantor and non guarantor subsidiaries, as of May 31, 2011 and August 31, 2010
and for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010. The information is presented on the
basis of Greenbrier accounting for its ownership of its wholly owned subsidiaries using the equity
method of accounting. The equity method investment for each subsidiary is recorded by the parent in
intangibles and other assets. Intercompany transactions of goods and services between the guarantor
and non guarantor subsidiaries are presented as if the sales or transfers were at fair value to
third parties and eliminated in consolidation.
20
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
May 31, 2011
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
28,875 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
4,941 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,302 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
Accounts receivable/intercompany
receivable (payable), net |
|
|
99,548 |
|
|
|
49,458 |
|
|
|
(5,516 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
143,491 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,104 |
|
|
|
139,647 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
289,740 |
|
Leased railcars for syndication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
58,316 |
|
Equipment on operating leases, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,016 |
) |
|
|
314,106 |
|
Investment in direct finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
6,443 |
|
|
|
97,457 |
|
|
|
46,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,091 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,066 |
|
Intangibles and other assets |
|
|
563,663 |
|
|
|
95,001 |
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
(573,601 |
) |
|
|
88,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
698,529 |
|
|
$ |
906,380 |
|
|
$ |
188,490 |
|
|
$ |
(575,657 |
) |
|
$ |
1,217,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving notes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,897 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,897 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
159,666 |
|
|
|
100,289 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
261,361 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(13,538 |
) |
|
|
94,999 |
|
|
|
(5,116 |
) |
|
|
(485 |
) |
|
|
75,860 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,821 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
358,702 |
|
|
|
135,864 |
|
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity Greenbrier |
|
|
351,456 |
|
|
|
510,692 |
|
|
|
64,481 |
|
|
|
(575,173 |
) |
|
|
351,456 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
351,456 |
|
|
|
510,692 |
|
|
|
77,000 |
|
|
|
(575,173 |
) |
|
|
363,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
698,529 |
|
|
$ |
906,380 |
|
|
$ |
188,490 |
|
|
$ |
(575,657 |
) |
|
$ |
1,217,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the three months ended May 31, 2011
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
108,654 |
|
|
$ |
131,987 |
|
|
$ |
(67,154 |
) |
|
$ |
173,487 |
|
Wheels Services, Refurbishment &
Parts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,848 |
) |
|
|
126,317 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
16,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
17,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
253,524 |
|
|
|
131,987 |
|
|
|
(69,306 |
) |
|
|
317,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,707 |
|
|
|
124,057 |
|
|
|
(67,090 |
) |
|
|
158,674 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment &
Parts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,865 |
) |
|
|
111,202 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,046 |
|
|
|
124,057 |
|
|
|
(68,973 |
) |
|
|
279,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
29,478 |
|
|
|
7,930 |
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
38,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
11,022 |
|
|
|
5,904 |
|
|
|
5,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,580 |
|
Gain on disposition of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
(9,947 |
) |
|
|
25,252 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
17,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
|
8,448 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
9,807 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
and earnings (loss) from unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
(28,402 |
) |
|
|
24,251 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(2,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
10,234 |
|
|
|
(9,561 |
) |
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before earnings (loss)
from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(18,168 |
) |
|
|
14,690 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(2,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
14,854 |
|
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,889 |
) |
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
(3,314 |
) |
|
|
14,186 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
(14,918 |
) |
|
|
(2,804 |
) |
Net earnings attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to
Greenbrier |
|
$ |
(3,314 |
) |
|
$ |
14,186 |
|
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
$ |
(14,887 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the nine months ended May 31, 2011
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
977 |
|
|
$ |
219,877 |
|
|
$ |
333,590 |
|
|
$ |
(138,896 |
) |
|
$ |
415,548 |
|
Wheels Services, Refurbishment &
Parts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,917 |
) |
|
|
333,600 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
50,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(884 |
) |
|
|
51,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
613,912 |
|
|
|
333,590 |
|
|
|
(149,697 |
) |
|
|
800,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,989 |
|
|
|
308,812 |
|
|
|
(138,827 |
) |
|
|
385,974 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment &
Parts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,906 |
) |
|
|
299,026 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
27,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552,074 |
|
|
|
308,812 |
|
|
|
(148,787 |
) |
|
|
712,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
61,838 |
|
|
|
24,778 |
|
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
88,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
27,004 |
|
|
|
16,475 |
|
|
|
14,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,212 |
|
Gain on disposition of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(6,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
(24,255 |
) |
|
|
51,371 |
|
|
|
10,045 |
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
36,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
|
26,830 |
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
30,646 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
and earnings (loss) from unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
(61,092 |
) |
|
|
48,308 |
|
|
|
8,402 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(4,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
22,782 |
|
|
|
(19,981 |
) |
|
|
(1,985 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before earnings (loss)
from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(38,310 |
) |
|
|
28,327 |
|
|
|
6,417 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
32,141 |
|
|
|
1,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,737 |
) |
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
(6,169 |
) |
|
|
30,223 |
|
|
|
6,417 |
|
|
|
(35,621 |
) |
|
|
(5,150 |
) |
Net earnings attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(1,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to
Greenbrier |
|
$ |
(6,169 |
) |
|
$ |
30,223 |
|
|
$ |
5,367 |
|
|
$ |
(35,590 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the nine months ended May 31, 2011
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(6,169 |
) |
|
$ |
30,223 |
|
|
$ |
6,417 |
|
|
$ |
(35,621 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,150 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss)
to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(14,267 |
) |
|
|
7,418 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5,276 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
21,835 |
|
|
|
4,430 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
28,174 |
|
Gain on sales of leased equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(2,901 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt (non-cash
portion) |
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
Accretion of debt discount |
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,446 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
4,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,961 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Decrease (increase) in assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
16,230 |
|
|
|
(85,760 |
) |
|
|
18,102 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(51,427 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,976 |
) |
|
|
(71,328 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(83,293 |
) |
Leased railcars for syndication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,512 |
) |
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(48,465 |
) |
Other |
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
2,778 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,834 |
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(9,775 |
) |
|
|
47,056 |
|
|
|
39,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,273 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(4,261 |
) |
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
(44,899 |
) |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(35,738 |
) |
|
|
(77,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments received under
direct finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
Proceeds from sales of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,179 |
|
Investment in and net advances to
unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(32,141 |
) |
|
|
(4,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,737 |
|
|
|
(979 |
) |
Intercompany advances |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(1,694 |
) |
|
|
(45,285 |
) |
|
|
(12,711 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(59,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
(33,895 |
) |
|
|
(35,321 |
) |
|
|
(12,711 |
) |
|
|
35,798 |
|
|
|
(46,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in revolving notes with
maturities of 90 days or less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
Proceeds from revolving notes with
maturities longer than 90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,373 |
|
Repayments of revolving notes with
maturities longer than 90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,194 |
) |
Intercompany advances |
|
|
(82,718 |
) |
|
|
81,895 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds from equity offering |
|
|
63,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,180 |
|
Expenses from equity offering |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,250 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(7,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,857 |
) |
Repayments of notes payable |
|
|
(235,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,164 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238,569 |
) |
Other |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in )
financing activities |
|
|
(32,789 |
) |
|
|
78,731 |
|
|
|
12,601 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
58,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(62,597 |
) |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
91,472 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
6,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
28,875 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
4,941 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
August 31, 2010
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
91,472 |
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
6,533 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
98,864 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,525 |
|
Accounts receivable/intercompany
receivable (payable), net |
|
|
33,001 |
|
|
|
45,154 |
|
|
|
11,094 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
89,252 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,128 |
|
|
|
66,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,626 |
|
Leased railcars for syndication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,786 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,804 |
|
Investment in direct finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
Equipment on operating leases, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,209 |
) |
|
|
302,663 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
6,710 |
|
|
|
89,246 |
|
|
|
36,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,614 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,066 |
|
Intangibles and other assets |
|
|
525,539 |
|
|
|
96,680 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
(533,924 |
) |
|
|
90,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
656,722 |
|
|
$ |
828,111 |
|
|
$ |
124,185 |
|
|
$ |
(536,130 |
) |
|
$ |
1,072,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving notes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,630 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,630 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities |
|
|
11,180 |
|
|
|
112,454 |
|
|
|
58,001 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
181,638 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
87,582 |
|
|
|
(6,685 |
) |
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
81,136 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
9,693 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,377 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
358,255 |
|
|
|
139,029 |
|
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
498,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity Greenbrier |
|
|
285,938 |
|
|
|
479,353 |
|
|
|
56,291 |
|
|
|
(535,644 |
) |
|
|
285,938 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
285,938 |
|
|
|
479,353 |
|
|
|
67,760 |
|
|
|
(535,644 |
) |
|
|
297,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
656,722 |
|
|
$ |
828,111 |
|
|
$ |
124,185 |
|
|
$ |
(536,130 |
) |
|
$ |
1,072,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the three months ended May 31, 2010
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,451 |
|
|
$ |
63,560 |
|
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
|
$ |
77,877 |
|
Wheels Services, Refurbishment &
Parts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,659 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,242 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
18,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
18,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
142,388 |
|
|
|
65,143 |
|
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
207,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,182 |
|
|
|
56,883 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
68,931 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment &
Parts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,565 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,725 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
9,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,697 |
|
|
|
58,043 |
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
175,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
24,691 |
|
|
|
7,100 |
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
31,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
8,444 |
|
|
|
5,469 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,519 |
|
Gain on disposition of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
(8,047 |
) |
|
|
23,246 |
|
|
|
3,494 |
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
18,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
|
9,527 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
10,811 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
and earnings (loss) from unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
(16,299 |
) |
|
|
22,210 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
8,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
7,366 |
|
|
|
(9,753 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before earnings (loss)
from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(8,933 |
) |
|
|
12,457 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
13,496 |
|
|
|
(622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,192 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
4,563 |
|
|
|
11,835 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
(13,179 |
) |
|
|
6,077 |
|
Net earnings attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to
Greenbrier |
|
$ |
4,563 |
|
|
$ |
11,835 |
|
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
|
$ |
(13,179 |
) |
|
$ |
4,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the nine months ended May 31, 2010
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,842 |
|
|
$ |
167,829 |
|
|
$ |
(12,651 |
) |
|
$ |
226,020 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment &
Parts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,286 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,870 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
53,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
|
|
53,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
420,493 |
|
|
|
169,413 |
|
|
|
(13,857 |
) |
|
|
577,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,971 |
|
|
|
152,705 |
|
|
|
(11,290 |
) |
|
|
206,386 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment &
Parts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,238 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,398 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
31,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358,902 |
|
|
|
153,865 |
|
|
|
(11,345 |
) |
|
|
501,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
61,591 |
|
|
|
15,548 |
|
|
|
(2,512 |
) |
|
|
76,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
24,780 |
|
|
|
15,655 |
|
|
|
10,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,686 |
|
Gain on disposition of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
(23,389 |
) |
|
|
51,595 |
|
|
|
5,297 |
|
|
|
(2,512 |
) |
|
|
30,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
|
29,448 |
|
|
|
3,215 |
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
|
|
34,328 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
and earnings (loss) from
unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
(51,562 |
) |
|
|
48,380 |
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
(1,305 |
) |
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
20,028 |
|
|
|
(20,142 |
) |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before earnings (loss)
from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(31,534 |
) |
|
|
28,238 |
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(1,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
28,101 |
|
|
|
(3,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,223 |
) |
|
|
(632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
(3,433 |
) |
|
|
24,728 |
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
(26,273 |
) |
|
|
(1,669 |
) |
Net earnings attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,444 |
) |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
(1,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to
Greenbrier |
|
$ |
(3,433 |
) |
|
$ |
24,728 |
|
|
$ |
865 |
|
|
$ |
(25,593 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the nine months ended May 31, 2010
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,433 |
) |
|
$ |
24,728 |
|
|
$ |
3,309 |
|
|
$ |
(26,273 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,669 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss)
to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
10,213 |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
17,084 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
21,109 |
|
|
|
5,413 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
27,967 |
|
Gain on sales of leased equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,032 |
) |
Accretion of debt discount |
|
|
6,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,701 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt (non-cash
portion) |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
Stock based compensation |
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
Other |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
(1,974 |
) |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
(1,467 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(11,051 |
) |
|
|
3,588 |
|
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
(1,615 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,807 |
) |
|
|
(9,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,195 |
) |
Leased railcars for syndication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,504 |
|
Other |
|
|
(975 |
) |
|
|
5,627 |
|
|
|
(1,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,428 |
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(1,762 |
) |
|
|
10,163 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
11,352 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(8,151 |
) |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
53,125 |
|
|
|
5,295 |
|
|
|
(25,903 |
) |
|
|
36,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments received under
direct finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
Proceeds from sales of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,794 |
|
Investment in and net advances to
unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(28,101 |
) |
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,223 |
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
Contract placement fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,050 |
) |
Intercompany advances |
|
|
7,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(632 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(23,287 |
) |
|
|
(3,391 |
) |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
(28,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
(22,511 |
) |
|
|
(12,589 |
) |
|
|
(3,391 |
) |
|
|
18,045 |
|
|
|
(20,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in revolving notes with
maturities of 90 days or less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,828 |
) |
Proceeds from revolving notes with
maturities longer than 90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,698 |
|
Intercompany advances |
|
|
35,992 |
|
|
|
(36,179 |
) |
|
|
(7,671 |
) |
|
|
7,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds from equity offering |
|
|
56,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,250 |
|
Expenses from equity offering |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
Repayments of notes payable |
|
|
(23,315 |
) |
|
|
(4,637 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,357 |
) |
Other |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in )
financing activities |
|
|
65,431 |
|
|
|
(40,816 |
) |
|
|
(8,494 |
) |
|
|
7,858 |
|
|
|
23,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
652 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
46,626 |
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
(5,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,408 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
63,485 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
12,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
110,111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,484 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
116,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Note 20 Subsequent Events
On June 30, 2011, Greenbrier entered into a five-year $245 million revolving line of credit,
maturing June 30, 2016. The Amended Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets
of Greenbrier and its material United States Subsidiaries, excluding the stock and assets of
certain foreign subsidiaries and assets pledged as security for existing term loans.
This new facility replaces a $100 million revolving line of credit maturing November 2011. In
connection with the entry into this facility, Greenbrier repaid on June 30, 2011 all obligations
outstanding under the term loan due June 2012, among Greenbrier, and affiliates of WL Ross & Co.
LLC (the WLR Term Loan). Immediately prior to its repayment and termination, there were outstanding
borrowings of $71.8 million under the WLR Term Loan.
The line of credit is available to provide working capital and interim financing of equipment,
principally for the United States and Mexican operations. Advances under this revolving credit
facility bear interest at variable rates that depend on the type of borrowing and the defined ratio
of debt to total capitalization.
The new facility contains customary representations, warranties, and covenants, including specified
restrictions on indebtedness, dispositions, restricted payments, transactions with affiliates,
liens, fundamental changes, sale and leaseback transactions and other restrictions.
On June 30, 2011 borrowings by Greenbrier under this facility were approximately $75.0 million and
outstanding letters of credit were approximately $3.9 million.
29
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Summary
We operate in three primary business segments: Manufacturing; Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts
and Leasing & Services. These three business segments are operationally integrated. The
Manufacturing segment, operating from facilities in the United States, Mexico and Poland, produces
double-stack intermodal railcars, conventional railcars, tank cars and marine vessels. The Wheel
Services, Refurbishment & Parts segment performs railcar repair, refurbishment and maintenance
activities in the United States, Mexico and Canada as well as wheel, axle and bearing servicing,
and production and reconditioning of a variety of parts for the railroad industry. The Leasing &
Services segment owns approximately 9,000 railcars and provides management services for
approximately 214,000 railcars for railroads, shippers, carriers, institutional investors and other
leasing and transportation companies in North America. Management evaluates segment performance
based on margins. We also produce rail castings through an unconsolidated joint venture.
The rail and marine industries are cyclical in nature. We are continuing to see recovery in the
freight car markets in which we operate. Demand for our marine barge products remains soft.
Customer orders may be subject to cancellations and contain terms and conditions customary in the
industry. Historically, little variation has been experienced between the quantity ordered and the
quantity actually delivered. Our railcar and marine backlogs are not necessarily indicative of
future results of operations.
Multi-year supply agreements are a part of rail industry practice. Our total manufacturing backlog
of railcars as of May 31, 2011 was approximately 13,600 units with an estimated value of $1.05
billion compared to 4,400 units valued at $370 million as of May 31, 2010. A portion of the orders
included in backlog reflects an assumed product mix. Under terms of the orders, the exact mix will
be determined in the future which may impact the dollar amount of backlog.
Marine backlog as of May 31, 2011 was approximately $250 thousand compared to $75 million as of May
31, 2010.
The recent global strengthening of freight car markets may at times limit the availability of
certain components of our products, particularly specialized components such as castings, bolsters
and trucks, and this may cause an interruption in production. Prices for steel, a primary component
of railcars and barges, and related surcharges have fluctuated significantly and remain volatile.
In addition, the price of certain railcar components, which are a product of steel, are affected by
steel price fluctuations. New railcar and marine backlog generally either includes fixed price
contracts which anticipate material price increases and surcharges, or contracts that contain
actual or formulaic pass through of material price increases and surcharges. We are aggressively
working to mitigate these exposures. The Companys integrated business model has helped offset some
of the effects of fluctuating steel and scrap steel prices, as a portion of our business segments
benefit from rising steel scrap prices while other segments benefit from lower steel and scrap
steel prices through enhanced margins.
In April 2010, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC, using a shelf
registration process. The registration statement was declared effective on April 14, 2010 and
pursuant to the prospectus filed as part of the registration statement, we may sell from time to
time any combination of securities in one or more offerings up to an aggregate amount of $300.0
million. The securities described in the prospectus include common stock, preferred stock, debt
securities, guarantees, rights, and units. We may also offer common stock or preferred stock upon
conversion of debt securities, common stock upon conversion of preferred stock, or common stock,
preferred stock or debt securities upon the exercise of warrants or rights. Each time we sell
securities under the shelf, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific
information about the terms of the securities being offered and of the offering. Proceeds from the
sale of these securities may be used for general corporate purposes including, among other things,
working capital, financings, possible acquisitions, the repayment of obligations that have matured,
and reducing or refinancing indebtedness that may be outstanding at the time of any offering. In
May 2010, we issued 4,500,000 shares of our common stock resulting in net proceeds of $52.7
million. In December 2010, we issued 3,000,000 shares of our common stock resulting in net proceeds
of $62.8 million.
In June 2009, in connection with a secured loan that the WL Ross Group made to us, we issued
warrants to the WL Ross Group to acquire 3,377,903 shares of our common stock at an exercise price
of $6.00 per share. WLR
30
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Recovery Fund IV, L.P. (Recovery Fund) and WLR IV Parallel ESC, L.P.
(Parallel Fund) own warrants to purchase 3,276,566 shares of Common Stock and Victoria McManus, a
director of the Company, owns warrants to purchase 101,337 shares of Common Stock. The exercise
price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are subject to adjustment as
provided in the warrant agreement. Our equity offering conducted in December 2010 resulted in an
automatic adjustment to the warrants to reduce the exercise price from $6.00 to $5.96 and to
increase the aggregate number of shares that may be purchased from 3,377,903 to 3,401,095.
In December 2010, we agreed with our joint venture partner to modify, with retroactive effect to
September 1, 2010, various agreements concerning the Greenbrier-GIMSA LLC (GIMSA) joint venture. We
agreed to increase revenue based fees to each of the partners for services provided to GIMSA, and
to extend the initial term of the joint venture to 2019 (after which the agreement is automatically
renewed for successive three year terms unless a party elects not to renew). We also agreed to
forego our option to increase our ownership percentage of GIMSA from fifty percent to sixty-six &
two thirds percent, and GIMSA agreed to forego the right to share, in an equitable manner, the net
benefits received from the modification of the long-term new railcar contract with General Electric
Railcar Services Corporation.
On March 30, 2011, we entered into a purchase agreement (the Purchase Agreement) with Merrill
Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (the Initial Purchasers).
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we sold to the Initial Purchasers $230 million aggregate
principal amount of our 3.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2018 (the Convertible Notes), which
included $15 million principal amount of Convertible Notes subject to the over-allotment option
granted to the Initial Purchasers. The over-allotment option was exercised in full and the sale of
$230 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes closed on April 5, 2011. In
connection with the closing, on April 5, 2011, we entered into the indenture (the Convertible Notes
Indenture) governing the Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes Indenture contains terms,
conditions and events of default customary for transactions of this nature.
The Convertible Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 3.5%, payable in cash semiannually in
arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on October 1, 2011. The Convertible Notes
will mature on April 1, 2018, unless earlier repurchased by us or converted in accordance with
their terms prior to such date. The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank
equally with our other senior unsecured debt. The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of
our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 26.2838 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the
Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $38.05 per
share. The initial conversion rate and conversion price are subject to adjustment upon the
occurrence of certain events, such as distributions, dividends or stock splits.
The net proceeds from the sale of the Convertible Notes, together with additional cash on hand,
were used to repurchase any and all of our outstanding $235 million aggregate principal amount of
8⅜% senior notes due 2015 (the 2015 Notes). There was a one-time charge recorded in association
with the early retirement of the 2015 Notes of approximately $10.0 million for the write-off of
unamortized debt acquisition costs, prepayment premiums and other costs.
On June 30, 2011, we entered into a five-year $245 million revolving line of credit, maturing June
30, 2016. The Amended Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of Greenbrier and its material
United States subsidiaries, excluding the stock and assets of certain
foreign subsidiaries and assets pledged as security for existing term
loans. This new facility replaces a $100 million revolving line of credit
maturing November 2011. In connection with the entry into this facility, we repaid on June 30, 2011
all obligations outstanding under the term loan due June 2012, among us, and affiliates of WL Ross
& Co. LLC (the WLR Term Loan). Immediately prior to its repayment and termination, there were
outstanding borrowings of $71.8 million under the WLR Term Loan. The line of credit is available to
provide working capital and interim financing of equipment, principally for the United States and
Mexican operations. Advances under this revolving credit facility bear interest at variable rates
that depend on the type of borrowing and the defined ratio of debt to total capitalization. The new
facility contains customary representations, warranties, and covenants, including specified
restrictions on indebtedness, dispositions, restricted payments, transactions with affiliates,
liens, fundamental changes, sale and leaseback transactions and other restrictions. On June 30,
2011 borrowings under this facility were approximately $75.0 million and outstanding letters of
credit were approximately $3.9 million.
31
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States requires judgment on the part of management to arrive at estimates and
assumptions on matters that are inherently uncertain. These estimates may affect the amount of
assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses reported in the financial statements and accompanying
notes and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities within the financial statements.
Estimates and assumptions are periodically evaluated and may be adjusted in future periods. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Income taxes - For financial reporting purposes, income tax expense is estimated based on planned
tax return filings. The amounts anticipated to be reported in those filings may change between the
time the financial statements are prepared and the time the tax returns are filed. Further, because
tax filings are subject to review by taxing authorities, there is also the risk that a position
taken in preparation of a tax return may be challenged by a taxing authority. If the taxing
authority is successful in asserting a position different than that taken by us, differences in tax
expense or between current and deferred tax items may arise in future periods. Such differences,
which could have a material impact on our financial statements, would be reflected in the financial
statements when management considers them probable of occurring and the amount reasonably
estimable. Valuation allowances reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that will more likely than
not be realized. Our estimates of the realization of deferred tax assets is based on the
information available at the time the financial statements are prepared and may include estimates
of future income and other assumptions that are inherently uncertain.
Maintenance obligations - We are responsible for maintenance on a portion of the managed and owned
lease fleet under the terms of maintenance obligations defined in the underlying lease or
management agreement. The estimated maintenance liability is based on maintenance histories for
each type and age of railcar. These estimates involve judgment as to the future costs of repairs
and the types and timing of repairs required over the lease term. As we cannot predict with
certainty the prices, timing and volume of maintenance needed in the future on railcars under
long-term leases, this estimate is uncertain and could be materially different from maintenance
requirements. The liability is periodically reviewed and updated based on maintenance trends and
known future repair or refurbishment requirements. These adjustments could be material due to the
inherent uncertainty in predicting future maintenance requirements.
Warranty accruals - Warranty costs to cover a defined warranty period are estimated and charged to
operations. The estimated warranty cost is based on historical warranty claims for each particular
product type. For new product types without a warranty history, preliminary estimates are based on
historical information for similar product types.
These estimates are inherently uncertain as they are based on historical data for existing products
and judgment for new products. If warranty claims are made in the current period for issues that
have not historically been the subject of warranty claims and were not taken into consideration in
establishing the accrual or if claims for issues already considered in establishing the accrual
exceed expectations, warranty expense may exceed the accrual for that particular product.
Conversely, there is the possibility that claims may be lower than estimates. The warranty accrual
is periodically reviewed and updated based on warranty trends. However, as we cannot predict future
claims, the potential exists for the difference in any one reporting period to be material.
Revenue recognition - Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured.
Railcars are generally manufactured, repaired or refurbished and wheel services and parts produced
under firm orders from third parties. Revenue is recognized when these products are completed,
accepted by an unaffiliated customer and contractual contingencies removed. Direct finance lease
revenue is recognized over the lease term in a manner that produces a constant rate of return on
the net investment in the lease. Operating lease revenue is recognized as earned under the lease
terms. Certain leases are operated under car hire arrangements whereby revenue is earned based on
utilization, car hire rates and terms specified in the lease agreement. Car hire revenue is
reported from a third party source two months in arrears; however, such revenue is accrued in the
month earned based on estimates of use from historical activity and is adjusted to actual as
reported. These estimates are inherently
uncertain as they involve judgment as to the estimated use of each railcar. Adjustments to actual
have historically not been significant. Revenues from construction of marine barges are either
recognized on the percentage of
32
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
completion method during the construction period or on the
completed contract method based on the terms of the contract. Under the percentage of completion
method, judgment is used to determine a definitive threshold against which progress towards
completion can be measured to determine timing of revenue recognition.
Impairment of long-lived assets - When changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of
certain long-lived assets may not be recoverable, the assets are evaluated for impairment. If the
forecast undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the assets, an
impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the assets to fair value is recognized in the
current period. These estimates are based on the best information available at the time of the
impairment and could be materially different if circumstances change. If the forecast undiscounted
future cash flows exceeded the carrying amount of the assets it would indicate that the assets were
not impaired.
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets - The Company periodically acquires businesses in purchase
transactions in which the allocation of the purchase price may result in the recognition of
goodwill and other intangible assets. The determination of the value of such intangible assets
requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates affect the amount of future
period amortization and possible impairment charges.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually during the third
quarter. Goodwill is also tested more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of
events indicates that a potential impairment exists. The provisions of Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other, require that we perform a two-step
impairment test on goodwill. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit
with its carrying value. We determine the fair value of our reporting units based on a weighting of
income and market approaches. Under the income approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting
unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Under the market approach, we
estimate the fair value based on observed market multiples for comparable businesses. The second
step of the goodwill impairment test is required only in situations where the carrying value of the
reporting unit exceeds its fair value as determined in the first step. In the second step we would
compare the implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying value. The implied fair value of
goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and
liabilities of that unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and
the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess
of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is
the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying
amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill. The goodwill
balance as of May 31, 2011 of $137.1 million relates to the Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts
segment. Goodwill was tested during the third quarter and the Company concluded that goodwill was
not impaired.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended May 31, 2010
Overview
Total revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2011 was $317.3 million, an increase of $109.9
million from revenues of $207.4 million in the prior comparable period. Net loss attributable to
Greenbrier for the three months ended May 31, 2011 was $3.3 million or $0.14 per diluted common
share compared to net earnings attributable to Greenbrier of $4.6 million or $0.23 per diluted
common share for the three months ended May 31, 2010. The net loss attributable to Greenbrier for
the three months ended May 31, 2011 included loss on extinguishment of debt of $10.0 million
pre-tax, $6.0 million net of tax.
33
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Margin: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
14,813 |
|
|
$ |
8,946 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts |
|
|
15,115 |
|
|
|
14,517 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
8,222 |
|
|
|
8,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment margin total |
|
|
38,150 |
|
|
|
31,844 |
|
Less unallocated expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
22,580 |
|
|
|
17,519 |
|
Gain on disposition of equipment |
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
(4,024 |
) |
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
|
9,807 |
|
|
|
10,811 |
|
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and loss
from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
$ |
(2,566 |
) |
|
$ |
8,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing Segment
Manufacturing includes results from new railcar and marine production. New railcar delivery and
backlog information includes all facilities.
Manufacturing revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2011 was $173.5 million compared to $77.9
million in the corresponding prior period, an increase of $95.6 million. Railcar deliveries, which
are the primary source of manufacturing revenue, were approximately 2,200 units in the current
period compared to approximately 700 units in the prior comparable period. The increase in revenue
was primarily due to higher railcar deliveries, somewhat offset by a change in railcar product mix
with lower per unit sales prices.
Manufacturing margin as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2011 was 8.5%
compared to a margin of 11.5% for the three months ended May 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily
the result of a marine and new railcar product mix which had less favorable pricing, as the prior
period contained multi-year contracts entered into prior to the downturn. Although the quarter
benefited from economies of operating at higher production levels, margins were impacted by
inefficiencies associated with temporary shortages of castings.
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts Segment
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts revenue was $126.3 million for the three months ended May 31,
2011 compared to revenue of $111.2 million in the prior comparable period. The increase of $15.1
million was primarily due to higher sales volumes, principally related to our wheel services
business, a product mix with a higher average sales price and metal scrapping programs that were
just ramping up in the prior comparable period.
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts margin as a percentage of revenue was 12.0% for the three
months ended May 31, 2011 compared to 13.1% for the three months ended May 31, 2010. The decrease
was primarily the result of a change in product mix which generates higher revenues with no
corresponding increase in margin dollars and higher freight costs associated with the impact of
severe weather at some of our locations. These decreases were partially offset by higher scrap
metal prices and metal scrapping programs that were just ramping up in the prior comparable year.
Leasing & Services Segment
Leasing & Services revenue was $17.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011 compared to
$18.3 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily a result of the
discontinuation of a certain management services contract. This was partially offset by increased
lease revenues due to an increase in the size of the owned leased fleet and higher rents earned on
leased railcars for syndication.
34
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Leasing & Services margin as a percentage of revenue was 47.0% and 45.8% for the three-month
periods ended May 31, 2011 and 2010. The increase was primarily a result of higher rents earned on
leased railcars for syndication, which was partially offset by the discontinuation of a certain
management services contract.
The percentage of owned units on lease as of May 31, 2011 was 96.8% compared to 94.5% at May 31,
2010.
Selling and Administrative
Selling and administrative expense was $22.6 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011
compared to $17.5 million for the comparable prior period, an increase of $5.1 million. The
increase was primarily due to employee related costs which includes the partial restoration of
previous salary reductions taken during the downturn and increases in incentive compensation,
revenue based fees paid to our joint venture partner in Mexico due to both higher activity levels
and a contractual increase in fee percentages, higher research and development costs associated
with our manufacturing products, and certain non-recurring items.
Gain on Disposition of Equipment
Gain on disposition of equipment was $1.7 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011 compared
to $4.0 million for the comparable prior period. The three months ended May 31, 2011 included a
$0.3 million gain that was realized on the disposition of leased assets and a gain of $1.4 million
of insurance proceeds related to the January 2009 fire at one of our Wheel Services, Refurbishment
& Parts facilities. The three months ended May 31, 2010 included a $3.1 million gain that was
realized on the disposition of leased assets and a gain of $0.9 million of insurance proceeds
related to the January 2009 fire. Assets from Greenbriers lease fleet are periodically sold in the
normal course of business in order to take advantage of market conditions, manage risk and maintain
liquidity.
Other Costs
Interest and foreign exchange expense was $9.8 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011,
compared to $10.8 million in the prior comparable period.
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Interest and foreign exchange: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other expense |
|
$ |
7,882 |
|
|
$ |
8,908 |
|
|
$ |
(1,026 |
) |
Accretion of term loan debt discount |
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Accretion of convertible debt discount |
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,807 |
|
|
$ |
10,811 |
|
|
$ |
(1,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other expense decreased due to lower debt levels. During the quarter, we repaid $235.0
million of senior unsecured loans at 8⅜% and replaced it with $230.0 million of convertible debt at
3.5%. The decrease in the accretion of the convertible debt discounts was due to the proportionate
write-off of the debt discount in the previous year associated with the partial retirement of the
convertible senior notes.
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt was a loss of $10.0 million for the three months ended May
31, 2011, compared to a gain of $1.3 million in the prior comparable period. The current quarter
relates to a loss on extinguishment of debt for the write-off of unamortized debt acquisition
costs, prepayment premiums and other costs associated with the full retirement of the $235.0
million senior unsecured notes. The three months ended May 31, 2010 included a $2.3 million gain on
extinguishment of debt associated with the early retirement of $22.2 million of convertible senior
notes (due 2026), which was offset by $1.0 million for the proportionate write-off of loan fees and
debt discount due to early repayments on the convertible note and certain term loans.
35
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Income Tax
The provision for income taxes is based on projected consolidated results of operations and
geographical mix of earnings for the entire year which results in an estimated 34.2% annual
effective tax rate. The effective tax rate fluctuates from period to period due to the geographical
mix of pre-tax earnings and losses, minimum tax requirements in certain local jurisdictions and
operating results for certain operations with no related tax effect. Relatively large changes in
tax rates are the result of relatively small pre-tax operating profits and losses in comparison to
the amount of taxes recorded. The tax rate for the three months ended May 31, 2011 was 11.7% as
compared to 27.4% in the prior comparable period. The difference between the estimated annual
effective tax rate and the actual tax rate is due to discrete expense items.
Loss from Unconsolidated Affiliates
Losses from unconsolidated affiliates were $0.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and
$0.3 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010. Losses for the three months ended May 31,
2011 and 2010 include losses from our castings joint venture and from WLR Greenbrier Rail Inc.
Noncontrolling Interest
Noncontrolling interest primarily represents our joint venture partners share in the earnings of
our Mexican railcar manufacturing joint venture that began production in fiscal year 2007.
Nine Months Ended May 31, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended May 31, 2010
Overview
Total revenue for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 was $800.6 million, an increase of $223.2
million from revenues of $577.4 million in the prior comparable period. Net loss attributable to
Greenbrier for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 was $6.2 million or $0.27 per diluted common
share compared to a net loss attributable to Greenbrier of $3.4 million or $0.20 per diluted common
share for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. The net loss attributable to Greenbrier for the nine
months ended May 31, 2011 included a loss on extinguishment of debt of $10.0 million pre-tax, $6.0
million net of tax.
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Margin: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
29,574 |
|
|
$ |
19,634 |
|
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts |
|
|
34,574 |
|
|
|
34,472 |
|
Leasing & Services |
|
|
24,307 |
|
|
|
21,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment margin total |
|
|
88,455 |
|
|
|
76,018 |
|
Less unallocated expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
58,212 |
|
|
|
50,686 |
|
Gain on disposition of equipment |
|
|
(6,148 |
) |
|
|
(5,659 |
) |
Interest and foreign exchange |
|
|
30,646 |
|
|
|
34,328 |
|
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and loss from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
$ |
(4,262 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing Segment
Manufacturing revenue for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 was $415.5 million compared to $226.0
million in the corresponding prior period, an increase of $189.5 million. Railcar deliveries, which
are the primary source of manufacturing revenue, were approximately 5,400 units in the current
period compared to approximately 1,800 units
in the prior comparable period. The increase in revenue was primarily due to higher railcar
deliveries, somewhat offset by a decline in marine barge activity and a change in railcar product
mix with lower per unit sales prices.
36
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Manufacturing margin as a percentage of revenue for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 was 7.1%
compared to 8.7% for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily the result of
reduction in marine production partially offset by
railcar margin improvements principally due to operating at higher production rates.
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts Segment
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts revenue of $333.6 million for the nine months ended May 31,
2011 increased by $35.7 million from revenue of $297.9 million in the prior comparable period. The
increase was primarily due to higher sales volumes in wheels and repair and metal scrapping
programs that were in effect for only a portion of the prior comparable period.
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts margin as a percentage of revenue was 10.4% for the nine
months ended May 31, 2011 compared to 11.6% for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. The decrease
was primarily the result of a change in product mix which generates higher revenues with no
corresponding increase in margin dollars and the impact of severe weather at some of our locations.
These decreases were partially offset by higher scrap metal prices and metal scrapping programs
that were in effect for only a portion of the prior comparable year.
Leasing & Services Segment
Leasing & Services revenue decreased $2.2 million to $51.4 million for the nine months ended May
31, 2011 compared to $53.6 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. The decrease was
primarily a result of the discontinuation of a certain management services contract which was
partially offset by higher rents earned on leased railcars for syndication.
Leasing & Services margin as a percentage of revenue increased to 47.3% for the nine months ended
May 31, 2011 compared to 40.9% for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. The increase was primarily a
result of increased rents earned on leased railcars for syndication and improved margins due to the
remarketing of railcars that were stored in the previous year and lower operating costs on railcars
in the lease fleet. These were partially offset by the discontinuation of a certain management
services contract.
Selling and Administrative
Selling and administrative expense was $58.2 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011
compared to $50.7 million for the comparable prior period, an increase of $7.5 million. The
increase was primarily due to higher employee related costs which includes the partial restoration
of previous salary reductions taken during the downturn and increases in incentive compensation,
increased revenue based fees paid to our joint venture partner in Mexico due to both higher
activity levels and a contractual increase in fee percentages, higher research and development
costs associated with our manufacturing products and certain
non-recurring items.
Gain on Disposition of Equipment
Gain on disposition of equipment was $6.1 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 compared
to $5.7 million for the comparable prior period. The nine months ended May 31, 2011 included a $2.9
million gain that was realized on the disposition of leased assets and a gain of $3.2 million of
insurance proceeds related to the January 2009 fire at one of our Wheel Services, Refurbishment &
Parts facilities. The nine months ended May 31, 2010 included a $4.0 million gain that was realized
on the disposition of leased assets and a gain of $1.7 million of insurance proceeds related to the
January 2009 fire. Assets from Greenbriers lease fleet are periodically sold in the normal course
of business in order to take advantage of market conditions, manage risk and maintain liquidity.
37
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Other Costs
Interest and foreign exchange expense was $30.6 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011,
compared to $34.3 million in the prior comparable period.
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Interest and foreign exchange: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other expense |
|
$ |
25,057 |
|
|
$ |
27,245 |
|
|
$ |
(2,188 |
) |
Accretion of term loan debt discount |
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
3,307 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Accretion of convertible debt discount |
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,646 |
|
|
$ |
34,328 |
|
|
$ |
(3,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other expense decreased due to lower debt levels. During the third quarter, we repaid
$235.0 million of senior unsecured loans at 8⅜% and replaced it with $230.0 million of convertible
debt at 3.5%. The decrease in the accretion of the convertible debt discounts was due to the
proportionate write-off of the debt discount in the previous year associated with the partial
retirement of the convertible senior notes.
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt was a loss of $10.0 million for the nine months ended May 31,
2011, compared to a gain of $1.3 million in the prior comparable period. The current period relates
to a loss on extinguishment of debt for the write-off of unamortized debt acquisition costs,
prepayment premiums and other costs associated with the full retirement of the $235.0 million
senior unsecured notes. The nine months ended May 31, 2010 included a $2.3 million gain on
extinguishment of debt associated with the early retirement of $22.2 million of convertible senior
notes (due 2026), which was offset by $1.0 million for the proportionate write-off of loan fees and
debt discount due to early repayments on the convertible note and certain term loans.
Income Tax
The provision for income taxes is based on projected consolidated results of operations and
geographical mix of earnings for the entire year which results in an estimated 34.2% annual
effective tax rate. The effective tax rate fluctuates from period to period due to the geographical
mix of pre-tax earnings and losses, minimum tax requirements in certain local jurisdictions and
operating results for certain operations with no related tax effect. Relatively large changes in
tax rates are the result of relatively small pre-tax operating profits and losses in comparison to
the amount of taxes recorded. The tax rate for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 was 19.1% as
compared to 49.7% in the prior comparable period. The difference between the estimated annual
effective tax rate and the actual tax rate is due to discrete expense items.
Loss from Unconsolidated Affiliates
Losses from unconsolidated affiliates were $1.7 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and
$0.6 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. Losses for the nine months ended May 31, 2011
include losses from our castings joint venture and from WLR Greenbrier Rail Inc.
Noncontrolling Interest
Noncontrolling interest primarily represents our joint venture partners share in the earnings of
our Mexican railcar manufacturing joint venture that began production in fiscal year 2007.
38
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have been financed through cash generated from operations, borrowings and issuance of stock.
During the nine months ended May 31, 2011, cash and cash equivalents decreased $64.6 million to
$34.3 million from $98.9 million at August 31, 2010.
Cash used in operations was $77.3 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 compared to cash
provided by operations for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 of $36.2 million. The decrease was
primarily due to a change in working capital needs as we ramp up production levels and an increase
in leased railcars for syndication due to higher activity levels.
Cash used in investing activities was $46.1 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011,
primarily for capital expenditures, compared to $20.4 million in the prior comparable period.
Capital expenditures totaled $59.7 million and $28.3 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011
and 2010. Of these capital expenditures, approximately $30.4 million and $15.5 million were
attributable to Leasing & Services operations. Leasing & Services capital expenditures for 2011,
net of proceeds from sales of equipment, are expected to be approximately $20.0 million. We
regularly sell assets from our lease fleet, some of which may have been purchased within the
current period and included in capital expenditures. Proceeds from sales of equipment were $14.2
million and $14.8 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010.
Approximately $14.3 million and $4.5 million of capital expenditures for the nine months ended May
31, 2011 and 2010 were attributable to Manufacturing operations. Capital expenditures for
Manufacturing operations are expected to be approximately $21.0 million in 2011 and primarily
relate to enhancements to existing manufacturing facilities and information technology systems
implementation.
Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts capital expenditures for the nine months ended May 31, 2011
and 2010 were $15.0 million and $8.2 million and are expected to be approximately $25.0 million in
2011 for the opening of a new wheel services facility to replace one previously destroyed by fire,
maintenance and improvement of existing facilities and information systems implementation.
Cash provided by financing activities was $58.5 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011
compared to $24.0 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. During the nine months ended May
31, 2011 we received $230.0 million in proceeds from a new convertible loan, net of $7.9 million in
debt issuance costs, and $1.3 million from a new term loan, $62.8 million in net proceeds from an
equity offering, $10.9 million in net proceeds from revolving notes borrowings and repaid $238.6
million in senior notes and other term debt. During the nine months ended May 31, 2010 we received
$52.7 million in net proceeds from an equity offering and $1.7 million was received in net proceeds
from a new term loan borrowing. This was partially offset by repayment of $28.4 million in term
debt and convertible notes and $2.1 million in net repayments under the revolving credit lines.
All amounts originating in foreign currency have been translated at the May 31, 2011 exchange rate
for the following discussion. As of May 31, 2011 senior secured credit facilities, consisting of
three components, aggregated $130.0 million. A $100.0 million revolving line of credit, maturing
November 2011, is secured by substantially all of our assets in the United States not otherwise
pledged as security for term loans. The facility is available to provide working capital and
interim financing of equipment, principally for the United States and Mexican operations. Advances
under this revolving credit facility bear interest at variable rates that depend on the type of
borrowing and the defined ratio of debt to total capitalization. In addition, current lines of
credit totaling $20.0 million secured by certain of our European assets, with various variable
rates, are available for working capital needs of the European manufacturing operation. European
credit facilities are continually being renewed. Currently these European credit facilities have
maturities that range from April 2012 through December 2012. In addition, the Mexican joint venture
line of credit for up to $10.0 million is secured by certain of the joint ventures accounts
receivable and inventory. Advances under this facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% and are due
180 days after the date of borrowing. Currently the Mexican joint venture can borrow on this
facility through August 2011. As of May 31, 2011 outstanding borrowings under our facilities
consists of $3.9 million in letters of credit outstanding under the North American credit facility,
$6.7 million outstanding under the European credit facilities and $7.2 million outstanding under
the Mexican joint venture credit facility.
39
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
The revolving and operating lines of credit, along with notes payable, contain covenants with
respect to the Company and various subsidiaries, the most restrictive of which, among other things,
limit our ability to: incur additional indebtedness or guarantees; pay dividends or repurchase
stock; enter into sale leaseback transactions; create liens; sell assets; engage in transactions
with affiliates, including joint ventures and non U.S. subsidiaries, including but not limited to
loans, advances, equity investments and guarantees; enter into mergers, consolidations or sales of
substantially all the Companys assets; and enter into new lines of business. The covenants also
require certain maximum ratios of debt to total capitalization and minimum levels of fixed charges
(interest plus rent) coverage.
Available borrowings under our credit facilities are generally based on defined levels of
inventory, receivables, property, plant and equipment and leased equipment, as well as total debt
to consolidated capitalization and interest coverage ratios which, as of May 31, 2011 would allow
for maximum additional borrowing of $399.3 million. The Company has an aggregate of $112.2 million
available to draw down under the committed credit facilities as of May 31, 2011. This amount
consists of $96.1 million available on the North American credit facility, $13.3 million on the
European credit facilities and $2.8 on the Mexican joint venture credit facility.
We may from time to time seek to repurchase or otherwise retire or exchange securities, including
outstanding borrowings and equity securities, and take other steps to reduce our debt or otherwise
improve our balance sheet. These actions may include open market repurchases, unsolicited or
solicited privately negotiated transactions or other retirements, repurchases or exchanges. Such
repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on a number of factors, including, but not limited
to, prevailing market conditions, trading levels of our debt, our liquidity requirements and
contractual restrictions, if applicable.
We have operations in Mexico and Poland that conduct business in their local currencies as well as
other regional currencies. To mitigate the exposure to transactions denominated in currencies other
than the functional currency of each entity, we enter into foreign currency forward exchange
contracts to protect the margin on a portion of forecast foreign currency sales.
Foreign operations give rise to risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We utilize
foreign currency forward exchange contracts with established financial institutions to hedge a
portion of that risk. No provision has been made for credit loss due to counterparty
non-performance.
In addition to the third party financing, Greenbrier has provided financing for a portion of the
working capital needs of our Mexican joint venture through a secured, interest bearing loan. The
balance of the loan was $19.0 million as of May 31, 2011. As of May 31, 2011, the Mexican joint
venture had $8.2 million of third party debt, of which we have guaranteed 50% or approximately $4.1
million.
In accordance with customary business practices in Europe, we have $7.2 million in bank and third
party performance and warranty guarantee facilities, all of which have been utilized as of May 31,
2011. To date no amounts have been drawn under these performance and warranty guarantees.
We have $0.5 million in long-term advances to an unconsolidated affiliate which are secured by
accounts receivable and inventory. As of May 31, 2011, this same unconsolidated affiliate had $30
thousand in third party debt of which we have guaranteed 33% or approximately $10 thousand. The
facility had been idled but has re-opened during the third quarter. We, along with our partners,
have made additional equity investments during fiscal 2011, of which our share was $0.9 million.
Additional investments will likely be required as production resumes.
We expect existing funds and cash generated from operations, together with proceeds from financing
activities including borrowings under existing credit facilities and long-term financings, to be
sufficient to fund working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and expected debt repayments
for the next twelve months.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently have off balance sheet arrangements that have or are likely to have a material
current or future effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
40
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We have operations in Mexico, Germany and Poland that conduct business in their local currencies as
well as other regional currencies. To mitigate the exposure to transactions denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency of each entity, we enter into foreign currency
forward exchange contracts to protect the margin on a portion of forecast foreign currency sales.
At May 31, 2011, $78.7 million of forecast sales in Europe were hedged by foreign exchange
contracts. Because of the variety of currencies in which purchases and sales are transacted and the
interaction between currency rates, it is not possible to predict the impact a movement in a single
foreign currency exchange rate would have on future operating results. We believe the exposure to
foreign exchange risk is not material.
In addition to exposure to transaction gains or losses, we are also exposed to foreign currency
exchange risk related to the net asset position of our foreign subsidiaries. At May 31, 2011, net
assets of foreign subsidiaries aggregated $28.9 million and a 10% strengthening of the United
States dollar relative to the foreign currencies would result in a decrease in equity of $2.9
million, or 0.8% of total equity Greenbrier. This calculation assumes that each exchange rate would
change in the same direction relative to the United States dollar.
Interest Rate Risk
We have managed a portion of our variable rate debt with interest rate swap agreements, effectively
converting $44.6 million of variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. As a result, we are exposed to
interest rate risk relating to our revolving debt and a portion of term debt, which are at variable
rates. At May 31, 2011, 65% of our outstanding debt has fixed rates and 35% has variable rates. At
May 31, 2011, a uniform 10% increase in interest rates would result in approximately $0.5 million
of additional annual interest expense.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our President and
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to
Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based on that
evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is
(1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner, and (2) accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended May 31, 2011, we commenced implementation of a new ERP system at our
Portland, Oregon manufacturing facility. The ERP implementation is accompanied by process changes
and improvements, which we believe will have a favorable impact on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting. The key controls surrounding the ERP system have been identified and are
subject to our Sarbanes-Oxley testing.
There were no additional changes, other than those noted above, in the Companys internal controls
over financial reporting during the quarter ended May 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
41
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There is hereby incorporated by reference the information disclosed in Note 16 to Consolidated
Financial Statements, Part I of this quarterly report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
During economic downturns or a rising interest rate environment, the cyclical nature of our
business results in lower demand for our products and reduced revenue.
Our business is cyclical. Overall economic conditions and the purchasing practices of buyers have a
significant effect upon our railcar repair, refurbishment and component parts, marine
manufacturing, railcar manufacturing and leasing and fleet management services businesses due to
the impact on demand for new, refurbished, used and leased products. As a result, during downturns,
we could operate with a lower level of backlog and may temporarily slow down or halt production at
some or all of our facilities. Economic conditions that result in higher interest rates increase
the cost of new leasing arrangements, which could cause some of our leasing customers to lease
fewer of our railcars or demand shorter lease terms. An economic downturn or increase in interest
rates may reduce demand for our products, resulting in lower sales volumes, lower prices, lower
lease utilization rates and decreased profits.
We face aggressive competition by a concentrated group of competitors and a number of factors may
influence our performance and our results of operations.
We face aggressive competition by a concentrated group of competitors in all geographic markets and
in each area of our business. The railcar manufacturing and repair industry is intensely
competitive and we expect it to remain so in the foreseeable future. A number of other factors may
influence our performance, including without limitation: fluctuations in the demand for newly
manufactured railcars or marine barges; fluctuations in demand for wheel services, refurbishment
and parts; our ability to adjust to the cyclical nature of the industries in which we operate;
delays in receipt of orders, risks that contracts may be canceled during their term or not renewed
and that customers may not purchase the amount of products or services under the contracts as
anticipated; domestic and global economic conditions including such matters as embargoes or quotas;
growth or reduction in the surface transportation industry; steel and specialty component price
fluctuations and availability, scrap surcharges, steel scrap prices and other commodity price
fluctuations and their impact on product demand and margin; loss of business from, or a decline in
the financial condition of, any of the principal customers that represent a significant portion of
our total revenues; competitive factors, including introduction of competitive products, new
entrants into certain of our markets, price pressures, limited customer base and competitiveness of
our manufacturing facilities and products; industry overcapacity and our manufacturing capacity
utilization; and other risks, uncertainties and factors. If we do not compete successfully or if we
are affected by any of these factors, our market share and results of operation may be adversely
affected.
A prolonged decline in performance of the rail freight industry would have an adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
Our future success depends in part upon the performance of the rail freight industry, which in turn
depends on the health of the economy. If railcar loadings, railcar and railcar components
replacement rates or refurbishment rates or industry demand for our railcar products weaken or
otherwise do not materialize, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely
affected.
Our backlog is not necessarily indicative of the level of our future revenues.
Our manufacturing backlog represents future production for which we have written orders from our
customers in various periods, and estimated potential revenue attributable to those orders. Some of
this backlog is subject to our fulfillment of certain competitive conditions. Our reported backlog
may not be converted to revenue in any particular period and some of our contracts permit
cancellations without financial penalties or with limited
42
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
compensation that would not replace lost revenue or margins. Actual revenue from such contracts may
not equal our backlog revenues, and therefore, our backlog is not necessarily indicative of the
level of our future revenues.
We derive a significant amount of our revenue from a limited number of customers, the loss of or
reduction of business from one or more of which could have an adverse effect on our business. A
significant portion of our revenue and backlog is generated from a few major customers. We cannot
be assured that our customers will continue to use our products or services or that they will
continue to do so at historical levels. A reduction in the purchase or leasing of our products or a
termination of our services by one or more of our major customers could have an adverse effect on
our business and operating results.
A prolonged decline in demand for our barge products would have an adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
The April 2010 catastrophic explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil drilling platform and the
related oil spill in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico coupled with currently weak economic conditions may
continue to have an adverse effect on our results of operations by reducing demand for our marine
barges. These could reduce our revenues and margins, limit our ability to grow, increase pricing
pressure on our products, and otherwise adversely affect our financial results.
We derive a significant amount of our revenue from a limited number of customers, the loss of or
reduction of business from one or more of which could have an adverse effect on our business.
A significant portion of our revenue and backlog is generated from a few major customers such as
BNSF Railway Company, General Electric Railcar Services Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad.
Although we have some long-term contractual relationships with our major customers, we cannot be
assured that our customers will continue to use our products or services or that they will continue
to do so at historical levels. A reduction in the purchase or leasing of our products or a
termination of our services by one or more of our major customers could have an adverse effect on
our business and operating results.
Fluctuations in the availability and price of energy, steel and other raw materials, and our fixed
price contracts could have an adverse effect on our ability to manufacture and sell our products on
a cost-effective basis and could adversely affect our margins and revenue of our manufacturing and
wheel services, refurbishment and parts businesses.
A significant portion of our business depends upon the adequate supply of steel, components and
other raw materials at competitive prices and a small number of suppliers provide a substantial
amount of our requirements. The cost of steel and all other materials used in the production of our
railcars represents more than half of our direct manufacturing costs per railcar and in the
production of our marine barges represents more than 30% of our direct manufacturing costs per
marine barge.
Our businesses also depend upon the adequate supply of energy at competitive prices. When the price
of energy increases it adversely impacts our operating costs and could have an adverse effect upon
our ability to conduct our businesses on a cost-effective basis. We cannot be assured that we will
continue to have access to supplies of energy or necessary components for manufacturing railcars
and marine barges. Our ability to meet demand for our products could be adversely affected by the
loss of access to any of these supplies, the inability to arrange alternative access to any
materials, or suppliers limiting allocation of materials to us.
In some instances, we have fixed price contracts which anticipate material price increases and
surcharges, or contracts that contain actual or formulaic pass through of material price increases
and surcharges. However, if the price of steel or other raw materials were to fluctuate in excess
of anticipated increases on which we have based our fixed price contracts, or if we were unable to
adjust our selling prices or have adequate protection in our contracts against changes in material
prices, or if we are unable to reduce operating costs to offset any price increases, our margins
would be adversely affected. The loss of suppliers or their inability to meet our price, quality,
quantity and delivery requirements could have an adverse effect on our ability to manufacture and
sell our products on a cost-effective basis.
43
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Decreases in the price of scrap adversely impact our Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts margin
and revenue. A portion of our Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts business involves scrapping
steel parts and the resulting revenue from such scrap steel increases our margins and revenues.
When the price of scrap steel declines, our margins and revenues in such business therefore
decrease.
If we are not able to procure specialty components on commercially reasonable terms or on a timely
basis, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely impacted. We
rely on limited suppliers for certain components needed in our production.
Our manufacturing operations depend in part on our ability to obtain timely deliveries of materials
and components in acceptable quantities and quality from our suppliers. Certain components of our
products, particularly specialized components like castings, bolsters and trucks, are currently
available from only a limited number of suppliers or even a single supplier. Recent increases in
the number of railcars manufactured have increased the demand for such components and continued
strong demand has caused temporary shortages and may cause industry-wide shortages if suppliers are
the process of ramping up production or reach capacity production. Our dependence on a limited
number of suppliers or a single-source supplier involves risks, including limited control over
pricing, availability and delivery schedules. If any one or more of our suppliers cease to provide
us with sufficient quantities of our components in a timely manner or on terms acceptable to us, or
cease to manufacture components of acceptable quality, we could incur disruptions or be limited in
our production of our products and we could have to seek alternative sources for these components.
We could also incur delays while we attempt to locate and engage alternative qualified suppliers
and we might be unable to engage acceptable alternative suppliers on favorable terms, if at all.
Any such disruption in our supply of specialized components or increased costs in those components
could harm our business and adversely impact our results of operations.
Changes in the credit markets and the financial services industry could negatively impact our
business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
During 2008 and 2009, the credit markets and the financial services industry experienced a period
of unprecedented turmoil, resulting in tighter availability of credit on more restrictive terms.
Such factors could have a negative impact on our liquidity and financial condition if our ability
to borrow money to finance operations, obtain credit from trade creditors, offer leasing products
to our customers or sell railcar assets to other lessors were to be impaired. In addition, if
economic conditions remain depressed it could also adversely impact our customers ability to
purchase or pay for products from us or our suppliers ability to provide us with product, either
of which could negatively impact our business and results of operations.
Our financial performance and market value could cause future write-downs of goodwill or
intangibles in future periods.
We are required to perform an annual impairment review of goodwill and indefinite lived assets
which could result in impairment write-downs. We perform a goodwill impairment test annually during
the third fiscal quarter. Goodwill is also tested more frequently if changes in circumstances or
the occurrence of events indicates that a potential impairment exists. When changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of certain long-lived assets may not be recoverable, the
assets are evaluated for impairment. If the carrying value of the asset is in excess of the fair
value, the carrying value will be adjusted to fair value through an impairment charge. As of May
31, 2011, we had $137.1 million of goodwill in our Wheel Services, Refurbishment & Parts segment
and $52.8 million in net identifiable intangible assets. Our stock price can impact the results of
the impairment review of goodwill and intangibles. Future write-downs of goodwill and intangibles
could affect certain of the financial covenants under debt instruments and could restrict our
financial flexibility. In the event of goodwill impairment, we may have to test other intangible
assets for impairment. Impairment charges to our goodwill or our indefinite lived assets could
impact our results of operations.
44
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
If we or our joint ventures fail to complete capital expenditure projects on time and within
budget, or if these projects, once completed, fail to operate as anticipated, such failure could
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
From time-to-time, we, or our joint ventures, undertake strategic capital projects in order to
enhance, expand and/or upgrade facilities and operational capabilities. For instance, we have
undertaken an expansion of our wheels services business near North Platte, Nebraska and commenced
construction of a new advanced automated wheel facility. In addition, our joint venture in Mexico
is currently building a third line of production. Our ability, and our joint ventures ability, to
complete these projects on time and within budget, and for us to realize the anticipated increased
revenues or otherwise realize acceptable returns on these investments or other strategic capital
projects that may be undertaken is subject to a number of risks, many of which are beyond our
control, including a variety of market, operational, permitting, and labor related factors. In
addition, the cost to implement any given strategic capital project ultimately may prove to be
greater than originally anticipated. If we, or our joint ventures, are not able to achieve the
anticipated results from the implementation of any of these strategic capital projects, or if
unanticipated implementation costs are incurred, our business, financial condition and results of
operations may be adversely affected.
The timing of our asset sales and related revenue recognition could cause significant differences
in our quarterly results and liquidity.
We may build railcars or marine barges in anticipation of a customer order, or that are leased to a
customer and ultimately planned to be sold to a third-party. The difference in timing of production
and the ultimate sale is subject to risk and could cause a fluctuation in our quarterly results and
liquidity. In addition, we periodically sell railcars from our own lease fleet and the timing and
volume of such sales is difficult to predict. As a result, comparisons of our quarterly revenues,
income and liquidity between quarterly periods within one year and between comparable periods in
different years may not be meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicators of our future
performance.
We could be unable to remarket leased railcars on favorable terms upon lease termination or realize
the expected residual values, which could reduce our revenue and decrease our overall return.
We re-lease or sell railcars we own upon the expiration of existing lease terms. The total rental
payments we receive under our operating leases do not fully amortize the acquisition costs of the
leased equipment, which exposes us to risks associated with remarketing the railcars. Our ability
to remarket leased railcars profitably is dependent upon several factors, including, but not
limited to, market and industry conditions, cost of and demand for newer models, costs associated
with the refurbishment of the railcars and interest rates. Our inability to re-lease or sell leased
railcars on favorable terms could result in reduced revenues and margins and decrease our overall
returns.
Risks related to our operations outside of the United States could adversely impact our operating
results.
Our operations outside of the United States are subject to the risks associated with cross-border
business transactions and activities. Political, legal, trade or economic changes or instability
could limit or curtail our foreign business activities and operations. Some foreign countries in
which we operate have regulatory authorities that regulate railroad safety, railcar design and
railcar component part design, performance and manufacturing. If we fail to obtain and maintain
certifications of our railcars and railcar parts within the various foreign countries where we
operate, we may be unable to market and sell our railcars in those countries. In addition,
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other trade barriers, more stringent
rules relating to labor or the environment, adverse tax consequences, currency and price exchange
controls could limit operations and make the manufacture and distribution of our products
difficult. The uncertainty of the legal environment or geo-political risks in these and other areas
could limit our ability to enforce our rights effectively. Because we have operations outside the
United States, we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act and similar worldwide anti-corruption laws. We operate in parts of the world that have
experienced governmental corruption to some degree, and in certain circumstances, strict compliance
with anti-corruption laws may conflict with local customs and practices. The failure to comply with
laws governing international business practices may result in
substantial penalties and fines. Any international expansion or acquisition that we undertake could
amplify these risks related to operating outside of the United States.
45
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
We depend on our senior management team and other key employees, and significant attrition within
our management team could adversely affect our business.
Our success depends in part on our ability to attract, retain and motivate senior management and
other key employees. Achieving this objective may be difficult due to many factors, including
fluctuations in global economic and industry conditions, competitors hiring practices, cost
reduction activities, and the effectiveness of our compensation programs. Competition for qualified
personnel can be very intense. We must continue to recruit, retain and motivate senior management
and other key employees sufficient to maintain our current business and support our future
projects. Cost-cutting measures that have reduced compensation make us vulnerable to attrition
among our current senior management team and other key employees, and may make it difficult for us
to hire additional senior managers and other key employees. A loss of any such personnel, or the
inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Some of our employees belong to labor unions and strikes or work stoppages could adversely affect
our operations.
We are a party to collective bargaining agreements with various labor unions at some of our
operations. Disputes with regard to the terms of these agreements or our potential inability to
negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions in the future could result in, among other things,
strikes, work stoppages or other slowdowns by the affected workers. We cannot be assured that our
relations with our workforce will remain positive or that union organizers will not be successful
in future attempts to organize at some of our other facilities. If our workers were to engage in a
strike, work stoppage or other slowdown, or other employees were to become unionized or the terms
and conditions in future labor agreements were renegotiated, we could experience a significant
disruption of our operations and higher ongoing labor costs. In addition, we could face higher
labor costs in the future as a result of severance or other charges associated with lay-offs,
shutdowns or reductions in the size and scope of our operations or due to the difficulties of
restarting our operations that have been temporarily shuttered.
Shortages of skilled labor could adversely impact our operations.
We depend on skilled labor in the manufacture of railcars and marine barges, repair and
refurbishment of railcars and provision of wheel services and supply of parts. Some of our
facilities are located in areas where demand for skilled laborers often exceeds supply. Shortages
of some types of skilled laborers such as welders could restrict our ability to maintain or
increase production rates and could increase our labor costs.
Our operations in Mexico are dependent on a number of factors, including factors outside of our
control. If we experience an interruption of our manufacturing operations in Mexico, our results of
operations may be adversely affected.
In Sahagun, Mexico, we depend on a third party to provide us with most of the labor services for
our operations under a services agreement. All of the labor provided by the third party is subject
to collective bargaining agreements, over which we have no control. If the third party fails to
provide us with the services required by our agreement for any reason, including labor stoppages or
strikes or a sale of facilities owned by the third party, our operations could be adversely
effected. Additionally, we could incur substantial expense and interruption if we are unable to
renew our Sahagun, Mexico manufacturing facilitys lease on acceptable terms, or at all. Any
interruption of our manufacturing operations in Mexico could adversely affect our results of
operations.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could lead to increased costs and lower
profitability.
Outside of the United States, we operate in Mexico, Germany and Poland, and our non-U.S. businesses
conduct their operations in local currencies and other regional currencies. We also source
materials worldwide. Fluctuations in exchange rates may affect demand for our products in foreign
markets or our cost competitiveness and may adversely affect our profitability. Although we attempt
to mitigate a portion of our exposure to changes in currency
rates through currency rate hedge contracts and other activities, these efforts cannot fully
eliminate the risks associated with the foreign currencies. In addition, some of our borrowings are
in foreign currency, giving rise to
46
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
risk from fluctuations in exchange rates. A material or adverse
change in exchange rates could result in significant deterioration of profits or in losses for us.
We have potential exposure to environmental liabilities, which could increase costs or have an
adverse effect on results of operations.
We are subject to extensive national, state, provincial and local environmental laws and
regulations concerning, among other things, air emissions, water discharge, solid waste and
hazardous substances handling and disposal and employee health and safety. These laws and
regulations are complex and frequently change. We could incur unexpected costs, penalties and other
civil and criminal liability if we fail to comply with environmental laws or permits issued to us
pursuant to those laws. We also could incur costs or liabilities related to off-site waste disposal
or remediating soil or groundwater contamination at our properties. In addition, future
environmental laws and regulations may require significant capital expenditures or changes to our
operations.
In addition to environmental, health and safety laws, the transportation of commodities by railcar
raises potential risks in the event of a derailment or other accident. Generally, liability under
existing law in the United States for accidents such as derailments depends on the negligence of
the party. However, for certain hazardous commodities being shipped, strict liability concepts may
apply.
Environmental studies have been conducted on our owned and leased properties that have indicated a
need for additional investigation and some remediation. Some of these projects are ongoing. Our
Portland, Oregon manufacturing facility is located adjacent to the Willamette River. The United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified portions of the river bed, including
the portion fronting our Portland, Oregon facility, as a federal National Priority List or
Superfund site due to sediment contamination (the Portland Harbor Site). We and more than 140
other parties have received a General Notice of potential liability from the EPA relating to the
Portland Harbor Site. The letter advised that we may be liable for the costs of investigation and
remediation (which liability may be joint and several with other potentially responsible parties)
as well as for natural resource damages resulting from releases of hazardous substances to the
site. At this time, ten private and public entities, including us, have signed an Administrative
Order on Consent (AOC) to perform a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) of the
Portland Harbor Site under EPA oversight, and several additional entities have not signed such
consent, but are nevertheless contributing money to the effort. A draft of the RI study was
submitted on October 27, 2009. The Feasibility Study is being developed and is expected to be
submitted in the fourth calendar quarter of 2011. Eighty-three parties, including the State of
Oregon and the federal government, have entered into a non-judicial mediation process to try to
allocate costs associated with the Portland Harbor site. Approximately 110 additional parties have
signed tolling agreements related to such allocations. On April 23, 2009, we and the other AOC
signatories filed suit against 69 other parties due to a possible limitations period for some such
claims; Arkema Inc. et al v. A & C Foundry Products, Inc., et al, US District Court, District of
Oregon, Case #3:09-cv-453-PK. All but 12 of these parties elected to sign tolling agreements and be
dismissed without prejudice, and the case has now been stayed by the court, pending completion of
the RI/FS. In addition, we have entered into a Voluntary Clean-Up Agreement with the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality in which we agreed to conduct an investigation of whether, and
to what extent, past or present operations at the Portland property may have released hazardous
substances to the environment. We are also conducting groundwater remediation relating to a
historical spill on the property which antedates our ownership.
Because these environmental investigations are still underway, we are unable to determine the
amount of ultimate liability relating to these matters. Based on the results of the pending
investigations and future assessments of natural resource damages, we may be required to incur
costs associated with additional phases of investigation or remedial action, and may be liable for
damages to natural resources. In addition, we may be required to perform periodic maintenance
dredging in order to continue to launch vessels from our launch ways on the Willamette River, in
Portland, Oregon, and the rivers classification as a Superfund site could result in some
limitations on future dredging and launch activities. Any of these matters could adversely affect
our business and results of operations, or the value of our Portland property.
47
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Our implementation of new enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems could result in problems that
could negatively impact our business.
We continue to work on the design and implementation of ERP and related systems that support
substantially all of our operating and financial functions. We could experience problems in
connection with such implementations, including compatibility issues, training requirements, higher
than expected implementation costs and other integration challenges and delays. A significant
implementation problem, if encountered, could negatively impact our business by disrupting our
operations. Additionally, a significant problem with the implementation, integration with other
systems or ongoing management of ERP and related systems could have an adverse effect on our
ability to generate and interpret accurate management and financial reports and other information
on a timely basis, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial reporting system and
internal controls and adversely affect our ability to manage our business.
A change in our product mix, a failure to design or manufacture products or technologies or achieve
certification or market acceptance of new products or technologies or introduction of products by
our competitors could have an adverse effect on our profitability and competitive position.
We manufacture and repair a variety of railcars. The demand for specific types of these railcars
and mix of refurbishment work varies from time to time. These shifts in demand could affect our
margins and could have an adverse effect on our profitability.
We continue to introduce new railcar products and technologies and periodically accept orders prior
to receipt of railcar certification or proof of ability to manufacture a quality product that meets
customer standards. We could be unable to successfully design or manufacture these new railcar
products and technologies. Our inability to develop and manufacture such new products and
technologies in a timely and profitable manner, to obtain certification, and achieve market
acceptance or the existence of quality problems in our new products could have a material adverse
effect on our revenue and results of operations and subject us to penalties, cancellation of orders
and/or other damages.
In addition, new technologies, changes in product mix or the introduction of new railcars and
product offerings by our competitors could render our products obsolete or less competitive. As a
result, our ability to compete effectively could be harmed.
Our relationships with our joint venture and alliance partners could be unsuccessful, which could
adversely affect our business.
In recent years, we have entered into several joint venture agreements and other alliances with
other companies to increase our sourcing alternatives, reduce costs, and to produce new railcars
for the North American marketplace. We may seek to expand our relationships or enter into new
agreements with other companies. If our joint venture alliance partners are unable to fulfill their
contractual obligations or if these relationships are otherwise not successful in the future, our
manufacturing costs could increase, we could encounter production disruptions, growth opportunities
could fail to materialize, or we could be required to fund such joint venture alliances in amounts
significantly greater than initially anticipated, any of which could adversely affect our business.
We could have difficulty integrating the operations of any companies that we acquire, which could
adversely affect our results of operations.
The success of our acquisition strategy depends upon our ability to successfully complete
acquisitions and integrate any businesses that we acquire into our existing business. The
integration of acquired business operations could disrupt our business by causing unforeseen
operating difficulties, diverting managements attention from day-to-day operations and requiring
significant financial resources that would otherwise be used for the ongoing development of our
business. The difficulties of integration could be increased by the necessity of coordinating
geographically dispersed organizations, integrating personnel with disparate business backgrounds
and combining different corporate cultures. In addition, we could be unable to retain key employees
or customers of the combined businesses. We could face integration issues pertaining to the
internal controls and operational functions of the
48
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
acquired companies and we also could fail to realize cost efficiencies or synergies that we
anticipated when selecting our acquisition candidates. Any of these items could adversely affect
our results of operations.
If we are not successful in succession planning for our senior management team our business could
be adversely impacted.
Several key members of our senior management team are at or nearing retirement age. If we are
unsuccessful in our succession planning efforts, the continuity of our business and results of
operations could be adversely impacted.
An adverse outcome in any pending or future litigation could negatively impact our business and
results of operations.
We are a defendant in several pending cases in various jurisdictions. If we are unsuccessful in
resolving these claims, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected. In
addition, future claims that may arise relating to any pending or new matters, whether brought
against us or initiated by us against third parties, could distract managements attention from
business operations and increase our legal and related costs, which could also negatively impact
our business and results of operations.
We could be liable for physical damage or product liability claims that exceed our insurance
coverage.
The nature of our business subjects us to physical damage and product liability claims, especially
in connection with the repair and manufacture of products that carry hazardous or volatile
materials. Although we maintain liability insurance coverage at commercially reasonable levels
compared to similarly-sized heavy equipment manufacturers, an unusually large physical damage or
product liability claim or a series of claims based on a failure repeated throughout our production
process could exceed our insurance coverage or result in damage to our reputation.
We could be unable to procure adequate insurance on a cost-effective basis in the future.
The ability to insure our businesses, facilities and rail assets is an important aspect of our
ability to manage risk. As there are only limited providers of this insurance to the railcar
industry, there is no guarantee that such insurance will be available on a cost-effective basis in
the future. In addition, due to recent extraordinary economic events that have significantly
weakened many major insurance underwriters, we cannot assure that our insurance carriers will be
able to pay current or future claims.
Any failure by us to comply with regulations imposed by federal and foreign agencies could
negatively affect our financial results.
Our operations and the industry we serve, including our customers, are subject to extensive
regulation by governmental, regulatory and industry authorities and by federal and foreign
agencies. These organizations establish rules and regulations for the railcar industry, including
construction specifications and standards for the design and manufacture of railcars; mechanical,
maintenance and related standards; and railroad safety. New regulatory rulings and regulations from
these entities could impact our financial results, demand for our products and the economic value
of our assets. In addition, if we fail to comply with the requirements and regulations of these
entities, we could face sanctions and penalties that could negatively affect our financial results.
Our product and repair service warranties could expose us to potentially significant claims.
We offer our customers limited warranties for many of our products and services. Accordingly, we
may be subject to significant warranty claims in the future, such as multiple claims based on one
defect repeated throughout our production or servicing process or claims for which the cost of
repairing the defective part is highly disproportionate to the original cost of the part. These
types of warranty claims could result in costly product recalls, customers seeking monetary
damages, significant repair costs and damage to our reputation.
If warranty claims attributable to actions of third party component manufacturers are not
recoverable from such parties due to their poor financial condition or other reasons, we could be
liable for warranty claims and other risks for using these materials on our products.
49
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
Changes in accounting standards, including accounting for leases, or inaccurate estimates or
assumptions in the application of accounting policies, could adversely affect our financial
results.
Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial
condition and results of operations. Some of these policies require use of estimates and
assumptions that may affect the reported value of our assets or liabilities and financial results
and are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective, and complex
judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. Accounting standard setters and those who
interpret the accounting standards (such as the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC, and
our independent registered public accounting firm) may amend or even reverse their previous
interpretations or positions on how these standards should be applied. In some cases, we could be
required to apply a new or revised standard retrospectively, resulting in the restatement of prior
period financial statements. In addition, the SEC may soon decide that issuers in the United States
should be required to prepare financial statements in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards, a comprehensive set of accounting standards promulgated by the International
Accounting Standards Board, instead of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and current
proposals could potentially require us to report under the new standards beginning as early as 2015
or 2016. Changes in accounting standards can be hard to predict and can materially impact how we
record and report our financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time we may take tax positions that the Internal Revenue Service may contest.
We have in the past and may in the future take tax positions that the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) may contest. Effective with fiscal year 2011, we are required by a new IRS regulation to
disclose particular tax positions, taken after the effective date, to the IRS as part of our tax
returns for that year and future years. If the IRS successfully contests a tax position that we
take, we may be required to pay additional taxes or fines that may adversely affect our results of
operation and financial position.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) List of Exhibits:
|
10.1 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Greenbrier Companies Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Plan dated May 25, 2011. |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Form of Employee Restricted Share Agreement (time and performance
vesting) related to the 2010 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive
Plan. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13 a 14 (a). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13 a 14 (a). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
50
THE
GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
|
|
Date: July 8, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Mark J. Rittenbaum
|
|
|
|
Mark J. Rittenbaum |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 8, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ James W. Cruckshank
|
|
|
|
James W. Cruckshank |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
51