e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number
1-33409
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
20-0836269
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 800
Dallas, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
75231-4388
(Zip Code) |
(214) 265-2550
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On October 31, 2007, there were 347,430,336 shares of the registrants common stock, $0.0001
par value, outstanding.
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
|
|
|
* |
|
No reportable information under this item. |
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,464,260 |
|
|
$ |
161,498 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
242,179 |
|
|
|
390,651 |
|
Restricted short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
607 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
96,090 |
|
|
|
92,915 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for
uncollectible accounts of $2,562 and $1,950
at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively) |
|
|
34,362 |
|
|
|
28,140 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
53,382 |
|
|
|
33,109 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
30,449 |
|
|
|
26,509 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
27,837 |
|
|
|
24,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,949,374 |
|
|
|
758,527 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,669,175 |
|
|
|
1,256,162 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
2,072,895 |
|
|
|
2,072,885 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
9,749 |
|
|
|
9,187 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
63,987 |
|
|
|
54,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,765,180 |
|
|
$ |
4,153,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
410,527 |
|
|
$ |
325,681 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
108,258 |
|
|
|
90,501 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
538,645 |
|
|
|
435,629 |
|
Long-term debt, net |
|
|
2,990,778 |
|
|
|
2,580,000 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
269,006 |
|
|
|
177,197 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
28,615 |
|
|
|
22,203 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
4,775 |
|
|
|
4,029 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
40,311 |
|
|
|
26,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,872,130 |
|
|
|
3,245,374 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERIES D CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE
PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK, par value
$0.0001 per share, 4,000,000 shares designated
at December 31, 2006, 0 and 3,500,993 shares
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006, respectively;
Liquidation preference of $447,388 at December
31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
443,368 |
|
SERIES E CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE
PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK, par value
$0.0001 per share, 500,000 shares designated at
December 31, 2006, 0 and 500,000 shares issued
and outstanding at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively; Liquidation
preference of $54,019 at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,135 |
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per
share, 100,000,000 shares authorized,
4,000,000 of which were designated as Series
D Preferred Stock and 500,000 of which were
designated as Series E Preferred Stock at
December 31, 2006; no shares of preferred
stock other than Series D & E Preferred
Stock (presented above) issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share,
1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 346,919,900
and 157,052,097 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,511,569 |
|
|
|
166,315 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
385,561 |
|
|
|
245,690 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(4,115 |
) |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,893,050 |
|
|
|
413,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
5,765,180 |
|
|
$ |
4,153,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
489,131 |
|
|
$ |
332,920 |
|
|
$ |
1,407,988 |
|
|
$ |
916,179 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
67,607 |
|
|
|
63,196 |
|
|
|
236,612 |
|
|
|
177,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
556,738 |
|
|
|
396,116 |
|
|
|
1,644,600 |
|
|
|
1,093,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding depreciation and
amortization expense of $40,247, $33,315,
$112,073 and $87,602, shown separately
below) |
|
|
163,671 |
|
|
|
113,524 |
|
|
|
471,233 |
|
|
|
313,510 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
131,179 |
|
|
|
117,982 |
|
|
|
437,925 |
|
|
|
330,898 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and amortization
expense of $5,246, $3,296, $13,923 and
$8,585, shown separately below) |
|
|
84,496 |
|
|
|
60,220 |
|
|
|
240,150 |
|
|
|
171,921 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
45,493 |
|
|
|
36,611 |
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
|
|
96,187 |
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
(1,615 |
) |
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
423,600 |
|
|
|
326,722 |
|
|
|
1,276,723 |
|
|
|
923,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
133,138 |
|
|
|
69,394 |
|
|
|
367,877 |
|
|
|
170,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
54,574 |
|
|
|
24,811 |
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
|
|
67,408 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
|
|
(4,386 |
) |
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
|
|
(15,106 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
46,518 |
|
|
|
20,628 |
|
|
|
123,503 |
|
|
|
52,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
86,620 |
|
|
|
48,766 |
|
|
|
244,374 |
|
|
|
117,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(33,512 |
) |
|
|
(19,500 |
) |
|
|
(96,820 |
) |
|
|
(47,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
53,108 |
|
|
|
29,266 |
|
|
|
147,554 |
|
|
|
70,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued dividends on Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,295 |
) |
|
|
(6,499 |
) |
|
|
(15,711 |
) |
Accrued dividends on Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
|
(2,244 |
) |
Accretion on Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
Accretion on Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to Common Stock |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
23,012 |
|
|
$ |
139,871 |
|
|
$ |
52,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
29,266 |
|
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
|
$ |
70,625 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale
securities, net of tax |
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
6,363 |
|
|
|
(847 |
) |
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedging
derivative, net of tax |
|
|
(9,286 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(4,157 |
) |
|
|
896 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains
included in net income, net of tax |
|
|
(5,016 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(7,545 |
) |
|
|
(622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
42,767 |
|
|
$ |
28,494 |
|
|
$ |
142,215 |
|
|
$ |
70,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
346,844,393 |
|
|
|
156,003,088 |
|
|
|
267,545,403 |
|
|
|
155,672,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
356,638,145 |
|
|
|
159,644,818 |
|
|
|
276,482,986 |
|
|
|
159,525,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
|
$ |
70,625 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
125,996 |
|
|
|
96,187 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
6,582 |
|
|
|
5,365 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
4,876 |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
|
3,702 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(8,523 |
) |
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
95,257 |
|
|
|
41,792 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
18,971 |
|
|
|
7,750 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(3,348 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(6,252 |
) |
|
|
(7,542 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(10,268 |
) |
|
|
(7,365 |
) |
Deferred charges |
|
|
(3,941 |
) |
|
|
(8,172 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(16,057 |
) |
|
|
(2,974 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
49,584 |
|
|
|
49,121 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
17,785 |
|
|
|
22,055 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
440,450 |
|
|
|
284,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(525,701 |
) |
|
|
(453,864 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(9,523 |
) |
|
|
2,427 |
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
Cash used in business acquisitions |
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(3,358,427 |
) |
|
|
(737,088 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
3,501,457 |
|
|
|
900,189 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
(3,291 |
) |
Purchases of FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
Deposit to FCC for licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(392,512 |
) |
|
|
(489,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
23,021 |
|
|
|
22,993 |
|
Proceeds from bridge credit agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Proceeds from 91/4% Senior Notes |
|
|
423,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from initial public offering |
|
|
862,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(3,120 |
) |
|
|
(15,313 |
) |
Cost of raising capital |
|
|
(44,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,446 |
) |
Proceeds from minority interest in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,254,824 |
|
|
|
208,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
1,302,762 |
|
|
|
3,556 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
161,498 |
|
|
|
112,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
1,464,260 |
|
|
$ |
116,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the
balances and results of operations of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (MetroPCS) and its
consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). MetroPCS indirectly owns, through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, 85% of the limited liability company member interest in Royal Street
Communications, LLC (Royal Street Communications). The consolidated financial statements include
the balances and results of operations of MetroPCS and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the
balances and results of operations of Royal Street Communications and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(collectively Royal Street). The Company consolidates its interest in Royal Street in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46-R, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, because Royal Street is a variable interest entity and the Company
will absorb all of Royal Streets expected losses. All intercompany accounts and transactions
between the Company and Royal Street have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
The redeemable minority interest in Royal Street is included in long-term liabilities. The
condensed consolidated interim balance sheets as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the
condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and cash flows for the periods
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related footnotes are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all
adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations
for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be
expected for any subsequent interim period or for the fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Federal Universal Service Fund (FUSF) and E-911 fees are assessed by various governmental
authorities in connection with the services that the Company provides to its customers. The Company
reports these fees on a gross basis in service revenues and cost of service on the accompanying
statements of income and comprehensive income. For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, the Company recorded approximately $24.7 million and $9.1 million, respectively, of FUSF and
E-911 fees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded
approximately $69.9 million and $28.2 million, respectively, of FUSF and E-911 fees. Sales, use and
excise taxes are reported on a net basis in selling, general and administrative expenses on the
accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income.
On March 14, 2007, the Companys board of directors approved a 3 for 1 stock split by means of
a stock dividend of two shares of common stock for each share of common stock issued and
outstanding at the close of business on March 14, 2007. Unless otherwise indicated, all share
numbers and per share prices included in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements give effect to the stock split.
On April 24, 2007, MetroPCS consummated its initial public offering (the Offering) of
57,500,000 shares of common stock priced at $23.00 per share (less underwriting discounts and
commissions). MetroPCS offered 37,500,000 shares of common stock and certain of MetroPCS existing
stockholders offered 20,000,000 shares of common stock in the Offering, which included 7,500,000
shares sold by MetroPCS existing stockholders pursuant to the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option. Concurrent with the Offering, all outstanding shares of preferred stock,
including accrued but unpaid dividends, were converted into 150,962,690 shares of common stock. The
shares began trading on April 19, 2007 on The New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PCS.
4
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
2. Share-Based Payments:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123(R)), the Company has recognized stock-based compensation
expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments, which includes stock options
granted to employees. SFAS No. 123(R) replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, (SFAS No. 123) and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations (APB No. 25). The
Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006. The Company records stock-based compensation
expense in cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses. Stock-based
compensation expense recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) was $7.1 million and $3.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cost of service for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 includes $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of
stock-based compensation. For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, selling, general
and administrative expenses include $6.5 million and $3.3 million, respectively, of stock-based
compensation. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) was $19.0 million
and $7.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cost of
service for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 includes $1.3 million and $1.0
million, respectively, of stock-based compensation. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006, selling, general and administrative expenses include $17.7 million and $6.8 million,
respectively, of stock-based compensation.
On April 18, 2007, the Company granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 5,480,448
shares of the Companys common stock to certain employees. The exercise price for the stock option
grants is $23.00, which was the price at which the Company agreed to sell its common stock to the
underwriters in the Offering. The stock options granted generally vest on a four-year vesting
schedule with 25% vesting on the first anniversary date of the award and the remainder pro-rata on
a monthly basis thereafter. The grant date fair value of these stock options approximated $57.3
million.
3. Short-Term Investments:
The Company has historically invested its substantial cash balances in, among other things,
securities issued and fully guaranteed by the United States or any state, highly rated commercial
paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand
deposits. These investments are subject to credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. The
Company has made investments of approximately $134.0 million in certain AAA rated
auction rate securities that are collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying
collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. As a result of the lack of
liquidity in this market, these securities have failed to attract a buyer at scheduled auctions for
these securities. As a result, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment loss on
investment securities in the amount of $15.0 million during the period ended September 30, 2007.
Such loss increased $17.1 million during the one month ended October 31, 2007 based on statements
received from the Companys broker. Management believes that any future additional impairment charges will
not have a material effect on the Companys liquidity.
4. Property and Equipment:
Property and equipment, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
$ |
276,332 |
|
|
$ |
193,856 |
|
Network infrastructure |
|
|
1,761,076 |
|
|
|
1,329,986 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
42,238 |
|
|
|
31,065 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
28,326 |
|
|
|
21,721 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
8,596 |
|
|
|
5,903 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,116,775 |
|
|
|
1,582,738 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(447,600 |
) |
|
|
(326,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,669,175 |
|
|
$ |
1,256,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
5. FCC Licenses and Microwave Relocation Costs:
The Company operates broadband PCS
networks under licenses granted by the FCC for a particular
geographic area on spectrum allocated by the FCC for broadband PCS services. In addition, in
November 2006, the Company acquired a number of advanced wireless services (AWS) licenses which
can be used to provide services comparable to the PCS services provided by the Company, and other
advanced wireless services. The PCS and AWS licenses included the obligation to relocate existing fixed
microwave users of the use of the Companys licensed spectrum if the
Companys spectrum interferes with their
systems and/or reimburse other carriers (according to FCC rules) that relocated prior users if the
relocation benefits the Companys system. Additionally, the Company incurred costs related to
microwave relocation in constructing its PCS and AWS networks. The PCS and AWS licenses and microwave
relocation costs are recorded at cost. Although PCS licenses are issued with a stated term, ten
years in the case of the PCS licenses and fifteen years in the case of the AWS licenses, the
renewal of PCS and AWS licenses is generally a routine matter without substantial cost and the
Company has determined that no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic, or other
factors currently exist that limit the useful life of its PCS and AWS licenses. The carrying value
of FCC licenses and microwave relocation costs was approximately $2.1 billion as of September 30,
2007.
The Companys primary indefinite-lived intangible assets are its FCC licenses. Based on the
requirements of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, (SFAS No. 142) the Company
tests investments in its FCC licenses for impairment annually or more frequently if events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of its FCC licenses might be impaired.
The Company performs its annual FCC license impairment test as of each September 30th. The
impairment test consists of a comparison of the estimated fair value with the carrying value. The
Company estimates the fair value of its FCC licenses using a discounted cash flow model. Cash flow
projections and assumptions, although subject to a degree of uncertainty, are based on a
combination of the Companys historical performance and trends, its business plans and managements
estimate of future performance, giving consideration to existing and anticipated competitive
economic conditions. Other assumptions include the Companys weighted average cost of capital and
long-term rate of growth for its business. The Company believes that its estimates are consistent
with assumptions that marketplace participants would use to estimate fair value. The Company
corroborates its determination of fair value of the FCC licenses, using the discounted cash flow
approach described above, with other market-based valuation metrics. Furthermore, the Company
segregates its FCC licenses by regional clusters for the purpose of performing the impairment test
because each geographical region is unique. An impairment loss would be recorded as a reduction in
the carrying value of the related indefinite-lived intangible asset and charged to results of
operations.
For the license impairment test performed as of September 30, 2007, the fair value of the FCC
licenses was in excess of its carrying value and no impairment has been recognized through
September 30, 2007.
6. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
121,720 |
|
|
$ |
90,084 |
|
Book overdraft |
|
|
44,309 |
|
|
|
21,288 |
|
Accrued accounts payable |
|
|
107,018 |
|
|
|
111,974 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
12,290 |
|
|
|
9,405 |
|
Payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
19,570 |
|
|
|
20,645 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
67,375 |
|
|
|
24,529 |
|
Taxes, other than income |
|
|
34,532 |
|
|
|
42,882 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
3,713 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
410,527 |
|
|
$ |
325,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
7. Long-Term Debt:
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
91/4% Senior Notes |
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility |
|
|
1,584,000 |
|
|
|
1,596,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
2,984,000 |
|
|
|
2,596,000 |
|
Add: unamortized premium on debt |
|
|
22,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
3,006,778 |
|
|
|
2,596,000 |
|
Less: current maturities |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,990,778 |
|
|
$ |
2,580,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1.4 Billion 91/4% Senior Notes
On November 3, 2006, MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. (Wireless) completed the sale of $1.0 billion
of 91/4% Senior Notes due 2014 (the Initial Notes). The Initial Notes are unsecured obligations and
are jointly and severally, fully and unconditionally, guaranteed by MetroPCS, MetroPCS, Inc., and
all of Wireless direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, but are not guaranteed by Royal
Street. Interest is payable on the Initial Notes on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning on
May 1, 2007. Wireless may, at its option, redeem some or all of the Initial Notes at any time on or
after November 1, 2010 for the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the Initial
Notes. In addition, Wireless may also redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the
Initial Notes with the net cash proceeds of certain sales of equity securities.
On November 3, 2006, Wireless also entered into a registration rights agreement. Under the
registration rights agreement, Wireless agreed to file a registration statement with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relating to an offer to exchange and issue notes
equal to the outstanding principal amount of the Initial Notes prior to the earlier of (i) 365 days
after the closing date of the Initial Notes and (ii) 30 days following the date that MetroPCS or
any of its subsidiaries, other than Royal Street, consummates a public offering of its capital
stock. In addition, Wireless agreed to use all commercially reasonable efforts to cause such
registration statement to be declared effective by the SEC on or prior to 180 days after the filing
of the registration statement and consummate the exchange offer within 30 business days after the
registration statement has been declared effective by the SEC. Alternatively, if Wireless is unable
to consummate the exchange offer or if holders of the Initial Notes are unable to participate in
the exchange offer for certain specified reasons, then Wireless must use commercially reasonable
efforts to file a shelf registration statement within the times specified in the registration
rights agreement to facilitate the resale of the Initial Notes. If (i) Wireless fails to file a
registration statement by the applicable deadline, (ii) any such registration statement has not
been declared effective by the SEC by the applicable deadline, (iii) the exchange offer has not
been consummated by the applicable deadline or (iv) any registration statement required by the
registration rights agreement is filed and declared effective but thereafter ceases to be effective
or fails to be usable for its intended purpose without being cured under the terms of the
registration rights agreement, then Wireless must pay each holder liquidated damages in an amount
equal to $0.05 per week per $1,000 in principal amount of Initial Notes for each week or portion
thereof that the default continues for the first 90-day period immediately following the occurrence
of the default. The amount of liquidated damages increases by an additional $0.05 per week per
$1,000 in principal amount of the Initial Notes with respect to each subsequent 90-day period until
all defaults have been cured, up to a maximum amount of liquidated damages of $0.20 per week per
$1,000 in principal amount of Initial Notes. On April 24, 2007, MetroPCS closed the Offering (See
Note 9). Under the terms of the registration rights agreement, Wireless was required to file a
registration statement related to the exchange offer with the SEC by May 24, 2007. On May 15, 2007,
Wireless filed such required initial registration statement on Form S-4 (the Existing Exchange
Offer Registration Statement).
On June 6, 2007, Wireless completed the sale of an additional $400.0 million of 91/4% Senior
Notes due 2014 (the Additional Notes) under the existing indenture at a price equal to 105.875%
of the principal amount of such Additional Notes. On June 6, 2007, Wireless entered into a
registration rights agreement in connection with the consummation of the sale of the Additional
Notes. Under the terms of this registration rights agreement, Wireless agreed to amend the Existing
Exchange Offer Registration Statement within 120 days of the date of the registration
7
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
rights agreement to include the Additional Notes. Wireless also agreed to use commercially
reasonable efforts to have such registration statement declared effective on or prior to November
12, 2007 and to commence and consummate the exchange offer as soon as practicable thereafter.
Alternatively, if Wireless is unable to consummate the exchange offer or if holders of the
Additional Notes cannot participate in the exchange offer for certain specified reasons, then
Wireless must use commercially reasonable efforts to file a shelf registration statement within the
times specified in the registration rights agreement to facilitate resale of the Additional Notes.
If (i) Wireless fails to file the amendment to the Existing Exchange Offer Registration Statement
by the applicable deadline, (ii) have such registration statement declared effective by the
applicable deadline, (iii) consummate the exchange offer by the applicable deadline or, in the
alternative, have the shelf registration statement declared
effective, or (iv) any registration statement required by the
registration rights agreement is filed and declared effective but
thereafter ceases to be effective or fails to be usable for its
intended purpose without being cured under the terms of the
registration rights agreement, then Wireless will be required to
pay certain liquidated damages as provided in the registration rights agreement which are
substantially the same as those for the Initial Notes. On October 10, 2007, Wireless filed such
required amendment to the Existing Exchange Offer Registration Statement (Amended Exchange Offer
Registration Statement). On October 11, 2007, the SEC declared the Amended Exchange Offer
Registration Statement effective. The exchange offer expired at 5:00 p.m. New York City
time on November 7, 2007, with all the Initial and Additional
Notes being tendered for exchange and the exchange offer was
consummated on November 13, 2007.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On November 3, 2006, Wireless entered into a secured credit facility, pursuant to which
Wireless may borrow up to $1.7 billion, as amended, (the Senior Secured Credit Facility). The
Senior Secured Credit Facility consists of a $1.6 billion term loan facility and a $100.0 million
revolving credit facility. The term loan facility is repayable in quarterly installments in annual
aggregate amounts equal to 1% of the initial aggregate principal amount of $1.6 billion. The term
loan facility will mature in seven years and the revolving credit facility will mature in five
years.
The facilities under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are guaranteed by MetroPCS, MetroPCS,
Inc. and each of Wireless direct and indirect present and future wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The facilities are not guaranteed by Royal Street, but Wireless pledged the
promissory note that Royal Street has given it in connection with amounts borrowed by Royal Street
from Wireless and the limited liability company member interest held in Royal Street
Communications. The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains customary events of default, including
cross defaults. The obligations are also secured by the capital stock of Wireless as well as
substantially all of Wireless present and future assets and the capital stock and substantially
all of the assets of each of its direct and indirect present and future wholly-owned subsidiaries
(except as prohibited by law and certain permitted exceptions), but excludes Royal Street.
The interest rate on the outstanding debt under the Senior Secured Credit Facility is
variable. The rate as of September 30, 2007 was 7.370%. On November 21, 2006, Wireless entered into
a three-year interest rate protection agreement to manage the Companys interest rate risk exposure
and fulfill a requirement of the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The agreement covers a notional
amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this portion of Wireless variable rate debt to
fixed rate debt. The quarterly interest settlement periods began on February 1, 2007. The interest
rate protection agreement expires on February 1, 2010. This financial instrument is included in
other long-term liabilities at fair market value, which was a loss of approximately $7.9 million as
of September 30, 2007. At December 31, 2006, this financial instrument was reported in long-term
investments at fair market value, which was approximately $1.9 million. The change in fair value
is reported in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the consolidated balance sheets,
net of income taxes. On February 20, 2007, Wireless entered into an amendment to the Senior Secured
Credit Facility. Under the amendment, the margin on the base rate used to determine the Senior Secured Credit
Facility interest rate was reduced to 2.25% from 2.50%.
As of September 30, 2007, there was a total of approximately $1.6 billion outstanding under
the Senior Secured Credit Facility, of which $16.0 million is reported in current maturities of
long-term debt and approximately $1.6 billion is reported as long-term debt on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
8. Income Taxes:
The Company records income taxes pursuant to SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
(SFAS No. 109). SFAS No. 109 uses an asset and liability approach to account for income taxes,
wherein deferred taxes are provided for book and tax basis differences for assets and liabilities.
In the event differences between the financial
8
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
reporting basis and the tax basis of the Companys assets and liabilities result in deferred
tax assets, a valuation allowance is provided for a portion or all of the deferred tax assets when
there is sufficient uncertainty regarding the Companys ability to recognize the benefits of the
assets in future years.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 provides guidance on
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition issues. The adoption of FIN
48 did not have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements. There was no cumulative
effect adjustment related to adopting FIN 48. As of January 1, 2007, the amount of unrecognized tax
benefits was $23.4 million of which $22.6 million would, if recognized, decrease the Companys
effective tax rate.
The Company files income tax returns in the US federal and certain state jurisdictions and is
subject to examinations by the IRS and other taxing authorities. Federal examinations of income tax
returns filed by the Company and any of its subsidiaries for the years ending prior to January 1,
2004 are complete. The State of California is in the process of examining the Companys income tax
returns for the years 2002 through 2003 and the Company has entered the appeals process. At this
time, the Company cannot accurately predict when any issues raised in the California audit will be
fully resolved.
The Company classifies interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income
tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, current liabilities included a total of $1.6 million and
non-current liabilities included a total of $8.8 million in accrued interest and penalties. The
amount of interest (after-tax) and penalties included in income tax expense for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $0.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
The Company does not expect that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the
positions included as of the date of the adoption will significantly increase or decrease within
the next twelve months.
Michigan Business Tax
On July 12, 2007, the Michigan Governor signed into law a new Michigan Business Tax (MBT
Act) which restructures the state business tax by replacing the Michigan Single Business Tax with
a new two-part tax on business income and modified gross receipts, collectively referred to as the
(BIT/GRT tax). On September 30, 2007, the Michigan Governor signed into law a BIT/GRT tax future
deduction which is intended to offset the increased deferred tax liability and expense associated
with the MBT Act. Because the main provision of the BIT/GRT tax imposes a two-part tax on business
income and modified gross receipts, the Company believes the BIT/GRT tax and related future
deduction should be accounted for under the provisions of SFAS No. 109 regarding the recognition of
deferred taxes. In accordance with SFAS No. 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities
of a change in tax law should be included in tax expense attributable to continuing operations in
the period that includes the enactment date. Although the effective date of the MBT Act is January
1, 2008, certain effects of the change should be reflected in the financial statements of the first
interim or annual reporting period that includes July 12 and September 30, 2007. The Company has
recorded a deferred tax liability and offsetting asset of $3.1 million as of September 30, 2007
relating to the MBT Act and future deduction.
9. Stockholders Equity:
Common Stock Issued to Directors
Non-employee members of MetroPCS Board of Directors receive compensation for serving on the
Board of Directors, as defined in MetroPCS Non-Employee Director Remuneration Plan. The annual
retainer provided under the Non-Employee Director Remuneration Plan may be paid, at the election of
each non-employee director, in cash, common stock, or a combination of cash and common stock.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, non-employee members of the Board of
Directors were issued 31,230 and 43,845 shares of common stock, respectively, as payment of their
annual retainer.
9
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Stockholder Rights Plan
On March 27, 2007, in connection with the Offering, the Company adopted a Stockholder Rights
Plan. Under the Stockholder Rights Plan, each share of the Companys common stock includes one
right to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of series A junior participating preferred stock.
The rights will separate from the common stock and become exercisable (1) ten calendar days after
public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons has acquired, or
obtained the right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 15% of the Companys outstanding common
stock or (2) ten business days following the start of a tender offer or exchange offer that would
result in a persons acquiring beneficial ownership of 15% or
more of the Companys outstanding common
stock. A beneficial owner holding 15% or more of MetroPCS common
stock is referred to as an acquiring person under the Stockholder Rights
Plan.
Initial Public Offering
On April 24, 2007, upon consummation of the Offering, the Companys Third Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation (the Restated Certificate), as filed with the Delaware Secretary of
State, became effective. The Restated Certificate provides for two classes of capital stock to be
designated, respectively, Common Stock and Preferred Stock. The total number of shares which the
Company is authorized to issue is 1,100,000,000 shares. 1,000,000,000 shares are Common Stock, par
value $0.0001 per share, and 100,000,000 shares are Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share.
The Restated Certificate does not distinguish classes of common stock or preferred stock.
10. Net Income Per Common Share:
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common
share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except share and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Basic EPSTwo Class Method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
29,266 |
|
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
|
$ |
70,625 |
|
Accrued dividends and accretion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,413 |
) |
|
|
(6,647 |
) |
|
|
(16,066 |
) |
Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
(2,498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common
stock |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
23,012 |
|
|
$ |
139,871 |
|
|
$ |
52,061 |
|
Amount allocable to common
shareholders |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
57.1 |
% |
|
|
84.6 |
% |
|
|
57.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights to undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
13,136 |
|
|
$ |
118,388 |
|
|
$ |
29,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstandingbasic |
|
|
346,844,393 |
|
|
|
156,003,088 |
|
|
|
267,545,403 |
|
|
|
155,672,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharebasic |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights to undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
13,136 |
|
|
$ |
118,388 |
|
|
$ |
29,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstandingbasic |
|
|
346,844,393 |
|
|
|
156,003,088 |
|
|
|
267,545,403 |
|
|
|
155,672,061 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,258 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
9,793,752 |
|
|
|
3,641,730 |
|
|
|
8,937,583 |
|
|
|
3,706,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstandingdiluted |
|
|
356,638,145 |
|
|
|
159,644,818 |
|
|
|
276,482,986 |
|
|
|
159,525,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharediluted |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share is computed in accordance with EITF 03-6,Participating Securities
and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128 (EITF 03-6). Under EITF 03-6, the
preferred stock is considered a participating security for purposes of computing earnings per
common share and, therefore, the preferred stock is included in the computation of basic and
diluted net income per common share using the two-class method, except during periods of net
losses. Preferred stock was included in the computation of basic and diluted net
10
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
income per common share through April 24, 2007, the date of conversion to common stock as a
result of the Offering. When determining basic earnings per common share under EITF 03-6,
undistributed earnings for a period are allocated to a participating security based on the
contractual participation rights of the security to share in those earnings as if all of the
earnings for the period had been distributed.
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, 6.3 million and 2.6 million,
respectively, of stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common
share since the effect was anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
3.6 million and 2.7 million, respectively, of stock options were excluded from the calculation of
diluted net income per common share since the effect was anti-dilutive.
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, 139.4 million of convertible shares of Series D
Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share since the
effect was anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, 59.1 million and
136.1 million, respectively, of convertible shares of Series D Preferred Stock were excluded from
the calculation of diluted net income per common share since the effect was anti-dilutive.
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, 5.8 million of convertible shares of Series E
Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share since the
effect was anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, 2.5 million and
5.7 million, respectively, of convertible shares of Series E Preferred Stock were excluded from the
calculation of diluted net income per common share since the effect was anti-dilutive.
11. Commitments and Contingencies:
The Company has entered into pricing agreements with various handset manufacturers for the
purchase of wireless handsets at specified prices. The terms of these agreements expire on various
dates during the year ending December 31, 2007. Total commitments
outstanding under these pricing agreements
are approximately $33.9 million as of September 30, 2007.
AWS Licenses Acquired in Auction 66
Spectrum
allocated for AWS currently is utilized by a variety
of categories of commercial and governmental users. To foster the orderly clearing of the spectrum,
the FCC adopted a transition and cost sharing plan pursuant to which incumbent non-governmental
users could be reimbursed for relocating out of the band and the costs of relocation would be
shared by AWS licensees benefiting from the relocation. The FCC has established a plan where the
AWS licensee and the incumbent non-governmental user are to negotiate voluntarily for three years
and then, if no agreement has been reached, the incumbent licensee is subject to mandatory
relocation where the AWS licensee can force the incumbent non-governmental licensee to relocate at
the AWS licensees expense. The spectrum allocated for AWS currently is utilized also by
governmental users. The FCC rules provide that a portion of the money raised in Auction 66 will be
used to reimburse the relocation costs of governmental users from the AWS band. However, not all
governmental users are obligated to relocate and some such users may delay relocation for some
time. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company incurred approximately
$0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in microwave relocation costs. No relocation costs
were incurred for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006.
FCC Katrina Order
The FCC recently released an Order which requires the Company to have an emergency back-up
power source for all assets that are normally powered from local alternating current commercial
power including mobile switching offices and cell sites. On October 3, 2007, the FCC released its
Order on Reconsideration, or Reconsideration Order, addressing the petitions for reconsideration of
the original Order. The Reconsideration Order requires the Company to have an emergency backup
power source for all assets necessary to maintain communications that are normally powered from
local commercial power, including those assets located inside mobile switching offices and cell
sites, and the Company must maintain emergency backup power for a minimum of twenty-four hours for
assets that are normally powered from local commercial power and located inside mobile switching
offices, and eight hours for assets that are normally powered from local commercial power and at
other locations, including cell sites and DAS
11
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
nodes. The Company will not be required to comply with these minimum backup power requirements
where the Company can demonstrate that such compliance is precluded by: (i) federal, state, tribal
or local law; (ii) risk to safety of life or health; or (iii) private legal obligation or
agreement. In addition, within 6 months of the effective date of the order, which is the date of
federal register publication announcing OMB approval of the information collection requirements,
the Company will be required to file a report with the FCC providing certain information with
respect to compliance with the backup power requirements. In cases where the Company identifies
assets that were designed with less than the required emergency backup power capacity and that is
not precluded from compliance, the Company must comply with the backup power requirement or, within
12 months from the effective date of the rule, file with the FCC a certified emergency backup power
compliance plan. That plan must certify that and describe how the Company will provide emergency
backup power to 100 percent of the area covered by any non-compliant asset in the event of a
commercial power failure. If the Company is required to comply with the Reconsideration Order the
Company may be required to purchase additional equipment, spend additional capital, seek and
receive additional state and local permits, authorizations and approvals, and incur additional
operating expenses to comply with this Order and such costs could be material.
Patent Litigation
On June 14, 2006, Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc., or
collectively Leap, filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-06CV-240-TJW and amended on June
16, 2006, for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless
Communication Services and Network and System for Delivering of Same, or the 497 Patent, issued
to Leap. The complaint seeks both injunctive relief and monetary damages for the Companys alleged
infringement of such patent. On August 3, 2006, the Company (i) answered the complaint, (ii) raised
a number of affirmative defenses, and (iii) together with two related entities, counterclaimed
against Leap and several related entities and certain current and former employees of Leap,
including Leaps CEO.
In its counterclaims, the Company claims that it does not infringe any valid or enforceable
claim of the 497 Patent. Certain of the Leap defendants, including its CEO, answered the Companys
counterclaims on October 13, 2006. In its answer, Leap and its CEO denied the Companys allegations
and asserted affirmative defenses to its counterclaims. In connection with denying a motion to
dismiss by certain individual defendants, the court concluded that the Companys claims against
those defendants were compulsory counterclaims. On April 3, 2007, the Court held a Scheduling
Conference at which the Court set the date for the claim construction hearing for December 2007 and
the trial date for August 2008. On October 31, 2007, the
Court administratively closed the suit and removed from its calendar
the dates for the claim construction hearing and trial. Additionally,
the Court stayed all discovery for a period not to exceed 6
months and the parties may not seek to reopen the case until 90 days after the Court
administratively closed the suit. If the Court reinstates the suit at the request of either party,
the Court will most likely set a new claims construction hearing date and trial date. The Company
plans to vigorously defend against Leaps claims relating to the 497 Patent.
If Leap were successful in its claim for injunctive relief, the Company could be enjoined from
operating its business in the manner it currently operates, which could require the Company to
expend additional capital to change certain of its technologies and operating practices, or could
prevent the Company from offering some or all of its services using some or all of its existing
systems. In addition, if Leap were successful in its claim for monetary damage, the Company could
be forced to pay Leap substantial damages for past infringement and/or ongoing royalties on a
portion of the Companys revenues, which could materially adversely impact its financial
performance.
The Company has also tendered Leaps claims to the manufacturer of its network infrastructure
equipment, Alcatel Lucent, for indemnity and defense. Alcatel Lucent has declined to indemnify and
defend the Company. The Company has filed a petition in state district court in Harrison County,
Texas for a declaratory ruling that Alcatel Lucent is obligated to cooperate, indemnify, defend and
hold the Company harmless from the Leap patent infringement action, for specific performance, for
injunctive relief and for breach of contract. On September 14, 2007, Alcatel Lucent responded to
the Companys petition and requested that the court dismiss, abate, stay and deny every claim in
the Companys petition asserted against Alcatel Lucent and order the Company to amend its petition.
On October 12, 2007, the Company responded to Alcatel Lucents request and a hearing has been
scheduled for December 6, 2007 on Alcatel Lucents request. The Company plans to vigorously
prosecute its petition.
12
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Litigation
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. The ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse
impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions in relation to claims of patent
infringement. The ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse
impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
12. Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(in
thousands) |
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
112,641 |
|
|
$ |
34,225 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
Non-cash investing activities:
Net increases in the Companys accrued purchases of property, plant and equipment were $11.2
million and $34.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Non-cash financing activities:
MetroPCS accrued dividends of $6.5 million and $15.7 million related to the Series D Preferred
Stock for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
MetroPCS accrued dividends of $0.9 million and $2.2 million related to the Series E Preferred
Stock for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
13. Related-Party Transactions:
One of the Companys current directors is a general partner of various investment funds
affiliated with one of the Companys greater than 5% stockholders. These funds own in the aggregate
an approximate 20% interest in a company that provides services to the Companys customers,
including handset insurance programs and roadside assistance services. Pursuant to the Companys
agreement with this related party, the Company bills its customers directly for these services and
remits the fees collected from its customers for these services to the related party. Accruals for
the fees that the Company collected from its customers are included
in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company had the following transactions with this related party (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Fees received by the Company as
compensation for providing
billing and collection services |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
Handsets sold to the related party |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
13
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Accruals for fees collected from customers |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
Receivables from the related party which were included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
One of the Companys current directors is a general partner of various investment funds
affiliated with one of the Companys greater than 5% stockholders. These funds own an interest in a
company that provides cell site leases to the Company. During the three months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006, the Company recorded rent expense of approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million,
respectively, for cell site leases. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the
Company recorded rent expense of approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for
cell site leases. As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company owed approximately
$0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, to this related party for deferred rent liability
related to these cell site leases that is included in deferred rents on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
14. Segment Information:
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Companys chief
operating decision maker is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had twelve operating segments based on geographic region
within the United States: Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Los Angeles, Miami, Sacramento, San
Francisco, Tampa/Orlando/Jacksonville, Boston, Las Vegas, New York and Philadelphia. Each of these
operating segments provides wireless voice and data services and products to customers in its
service areas or is currently constructing a network in order to provide these services. These
services include unlimited local and long distance calling, voicemail, caller ID, call waiting,
enhanced directory assistance, text messaging, picture and multimedia messaging, international long
distance and text messaging, ringtones, games and content applications, unlimited directory
assistance, ring back tones, nationwide roaming, mobile Internet browsing, mobile instant
messaging, push e-mail and other value-added services.
The Company aggregates its operating segments into two reportable segments: Core Markets and
Expansion Markets.
|
|
|
Core Markets, which include Atlanta, Miami, Sacramento and San Francisco, are
aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision
maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes,
class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and currently exhibit
similar financial performance and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets, which include Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Los Angeles,
Tampa/Orlando/Jacksonville, Boston, Las Vegas, New York and Philadelphia, are aggregated
because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision maker, they
are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes, class of
customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and have similar expected
long-term financial performance and economic characteristics. |
General corporate overhead, which includes expenses such as corporate employee labor costs,
rent and utilities, legal, accounting and auditing expenses, is allocated equally across all
operating segments. Corporate marketing and advertising expenses are allocated equally to the
operating segments, beginning in the period during which the Company launches service in that
operating segment. Expenses associated with the Companys national data center and national
operations center are allocated based on the average number of customers in each operating segment.
There are no transactions between reportable segments.
Interest expense, interest income, gain/loss on extinguishment of debt and income taxes are
not allocated to the segments in the computation of segment operating results for internal
evaluation purposes.
14
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
358,245 |
|
|
$ |
130,886 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
489,131 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
48,165 |
|
|
|
19,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,607 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
406,410 |
|
|
|
150,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556,738 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
108,077 |
|
|
|
55,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,671 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
87,232 |
|
|
|
43,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,179 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (2) |
|
|
40,651 |
|
|
|
43,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,496 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (3) |
|
|
170,983 |
|
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
30,691 |
|
|
|
12,769 |
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
45,493 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,107 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
140,752 |
|
|
|
(5,587 |
) |
|
|
(2,027 |
) |
|
|
133,138 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,574 |
|
|
|
54,574 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
140,752 |
|
|
|
(5,587 |
) |
|
|
(48,545 |
) |
|
|
86,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
285,313 |
|
|
$ |
47,607 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
332,920 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
50,594 |
|
|
|
12,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,196 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
335,907 |
|
|
|
60,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,116 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
83,498 |
|
|
|
30,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,524 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
87,614 |
|
|
|
30,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,982 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (2) |
|
|
38,541 |
|
|
|
21,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,220 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) (3) |
|
|
128,283 |
|
|
|
(20,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28,796 |
|
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
36,611 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,781 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
98,864 |
|
|
|
(28,545 |
) |
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
69,394 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,811 |
|
|
|
24,811 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,386 |
) |
|
|
(4,386 |
) |
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
98,864 |
|
|
|
(28,545 |
) |
|
|
(21,553 |
) |
|
|
48,766 |
|
15
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
1,051,727 |
|
|
$ |
356,261 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,407,988 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
168,535 |
|
|
|
68,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,612 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1,220,262 |
|
|
|
424,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644,600 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
319,123 |
|
|
|
152,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471,233 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
290,160 |
|
|
|
147,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437,925 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (2) |
|
|
128,335 |
|
|
|
111,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,150 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (3) |
|
|
489,175 |
|
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
87,008 |
|
|
|
34,365 |
|
|
|
4,623 |
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
6,532 |
|
|
|
12,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,971 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
394,378 |
|
|
|
(21,670 |
) |
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
367,877 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
394,378 |
|
|
|
(21,670 |
) |
|
|
(128,334 |
) |
|
|
244,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
831,053 |
|
|
$ |
85,126 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
916,179 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
149,200 |
|
|
|
28,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,592 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
980,253 |
|
|
|
113,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,093,771 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
244,636 |
|
|
|
68,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313,510 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
261,258 |
|
|
|
69,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,898 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (2) |
|
|
114,021 |
|
|
|
57,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,921 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) (3) |
|
|
364,585 |
|
|
|
(79,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
80,467 |
|
|
|
13,381 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
96,187 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
3,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,750 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
269,735 |
|
|
|
(96,904 |
) |
|
|
(2,339 |
) |
|
|
170,492 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,408 |
|
|
|
67,408 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,106 |
) |
|
|
(15,106 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
269,735 |
|
|
|
(96,904 |
) |
|
|
(54,961 |
) |
|
|
117,870 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, includes $0.6 million
and $1.3 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation disclosed separately. Cost of
service for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, includes $0.5 million and $1.0
million, respectively, of stock-based compensation disclosed separately. |
|
(2) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses include stock-based compensation disclosed
separately. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, selling, general and
administrative expenses include $6.5 million and $17.7 million, respectively, of stock-based
compensation. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, selling, general and
administrative expenses include $3.3 million and $6.8 million, respectively, of stock-based
compensation. |
|
(3) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) is presented in accordance with SFAS No.
131 as it is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of
the Companys ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital
requirements and to fund future growth. |
The following table reconciles segment Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 to consolidated income before provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
170,983 |
|
|
$ |
128,283 |
|
|
$ |
489,175 |
|
|
$ |
364,585 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) |
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
(20,112 |
) |
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
|
(79,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
184,499 |
|
|
|
108,171 |
|
|
|
514,263 |
|
|
|
285,192 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(45,493 |
) |
|
|
(36,611 |
) |
|
|
(125,996 |
) |
|
|
(96,187 |
) |
Gain (loss) on disposal of assets |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
(1,419 |
) |
|
|
(10,763 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
(7,107 |
) |
|
|
(3,781 |
) |
|
|
(18,971 |
) |
|
|
(7,750 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(54,574 |
) |
|
|
(24,811 |
) |
|
|
(152,718 |
) |
|
|
(67,408 |
) |
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
(564 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
23,317 |
|
|
|
4,386 |
|
|
|
44,968 |
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
(15,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
86,620 |
|
|
$ |
48,766 |
|
|
$ |
244,374 |
|
|
$ |
117,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
15. Guarantor Subsidiaries:
In connection with Wireless sale of the 91/4% Senior Notes due 2014 and the
entry into the
Senior Secured Credit Facility, MetroPCS and all of MetroPCS subsidiaries, other than Wireless and
Royal Street (the guarantor subsidiaries), provided guarantees on the Initial Notes and the
Additional Notes (referred to together as the 91/4% Senior Notes) and Senior Secured Credit
Facility. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as
joint and several. Certain provisions of the Senior Secured Credit
Facility restrict the ability of Wireless to loan funds to MetroPCS.
However, Wireless is allowed to make certain permitted payments to
MetroPCS under the terms of the Senior Secured Credit Facility. Royal Street (the non-guarantor subsidiaries) is not a guarantor
of the 91/4% Senior Notes or the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
The following information presents condensed consolidating balance sheets as of September 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, condensed consolidating statements of income for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 of the parent company (MetroPCS), the issuer
(Wireless), the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries (Royal Street).
Investments in subsidiaries held by the parent company and the issuer have been presented using the
equity method of accounting.
17
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
685,458 |
|
|
$ |
672,979 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
$ |
105,439 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,464,260 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
215,822 |
|
|
|
26,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,179 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,344 |
|
|
|
6,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,090 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,362 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
10,391 |
|
|
|
39,622 |
|
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,382 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,449 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815 |
|
Current receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147,844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
6,153 |
|
|
|
18,543 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
904,052 |
|
|
|
1,016,397 |
|
|
|
65,295 |
|
|
|
111,474 |
|
|
|
(147,844 |
) |
|
|
1,949,374 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,225 |
|
|
|
1,389,570 |
|
|
|
256,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,669,175 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
456,486 |
|
|
|
1,279,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,735,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,779,296 |
|
|
|
293,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072,895 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,749 |
|
Long-term receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
609,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(609,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
43,813 |
|
|
|
6,361 |
|
|
|
12,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,361,767 |
|
|
$ |
2,971,981 |
|
|
$ |
3,250,271 |
|
|
$ |
674,037 |
|
|
$ |
(2,492,876 |
) |
|
$ |
5,765,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and
accrued expenses |
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
|
$ |
167,940 |
|
|
$ |
195,283 |
|
|
$ |
46,123 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
410,527 |
|
Current payable to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,844 |
|
|
|
(147,844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,107 |
|
|
|
87,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,258 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
(532,464 |
) |
|
|
(982,933 |
) |
|
|
1,515,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
(531,283 |
) |
|
|
(777,857 |
) |
|
|
1,801,561 |
|
|
|
194,068 |
|
|
|
(147,844 |
) |
|
|
538,645 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,990,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,990,778 |
|
Long-term debt to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609,074 |
|
|
|
(609,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,006 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,734 |
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,615 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,775 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,793 |
|
|
|
8,902 |
|
|
|
2,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
(531,283 |
) |
|
|
2,515,495 |
|
|
|
1,837,197 |
|
|
|
807,639 |
|
|
|
(756,918 |
) |
|
|
3,872,130 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES (See Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,511,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
1,511,569 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
385,561 |
|
|
|
461,221 |
|
|
|
1,413,074 |
|
|
|
(153,602 |
) |
|
|
(1,720,693 |
) |
|
|
385,561 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(4,115 |
) |
|
|
(4,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,735 |
|
|
|
(4,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,893,050 |
|
|
|
456,486 |
|
|
|
1,413,074 |
|
|
|
(133,602 |
) |
|
|
(1,735,958 |
) |
|
|
1,893,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,361,767 |
|
|
$ |
2,971,981 |
|
|
$ |
3,250,271 |
|
|
$ |
674,037 |
|
|
$ |
(2,492,876 |
) |
|
$ |
5,765,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
15,714 |
|
|
$ |
99,301 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
46,226 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
161,498 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
45,365 |
|
|
|
345,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,651 |
|
Restricted short-term
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,339 |
|
|
|
11,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,915 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
(2,213 |
) |
|
|
28,140 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,107 |
|
|
|
23,865 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,109 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,509 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815 |
|
Current receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
9,478 |
|
|
|
15,354 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
24,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
61,176 |
|
|
|
605,473 |
|
|
|
51,052 |
|
|
|
48,539 |
|
|
|
(7,713 |
) |
|
|
758,527 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,077 |
|
|
|
1,158,442 |
|
|
|
83,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,256,162 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
320,783 |
|
|
|
939,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,259,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
1,391,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,876 |
|
|
|
293,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072,885 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,187 |
|
Long-term receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
456,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(456,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
51,477 |
|
|
|
4,078 |
|
|
|
5,810 |
|
|
|
(7,268 |
) |
|
|
54,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,773,768 |
|
|
$ |
2,067,971 |
|
|
$ |
1,610,635 |
|
|
$ |
431,591 |
|
|
$ |
(1,730,843 |
) |
|
$ |
4,153,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and
accrued expenses |
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
138,953 |
|
|
$ |
161,663 |
|
|
$ |
29,614 |
|
|
$ |
(4,950 |
) |
|
$ |
325,681 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
|
(4,734 |
) |
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,030 |
|
|
|
71,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,501 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
865,612 |
|
|
|
(1,207,821 |
) |
|
|
341,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
866,013 |
|
|
|
(1,033,807 |
) |
|
|
578,500 |
|
|
|
35,105 |
|
|
|
(10,182 |
) |
|
|
435,629 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,580,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
|
(4,540 |
) |
|
|
2,580,000 |
|
Long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456,070 |
|
|
|
(456,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
177,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,197 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,784 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,203 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,029 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,517 |
|
|
|
6,285 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
866,020 |
|
|
|
1,746,929 |
|
|
|
606,569 |
|
|
|
496,648 |
|
|
|
(470,792 |
) |
|
|
3,245,374 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES (See Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERIES D PREFERRED STOCK |
|
|
443,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443,368 |
|
SERIES E PREFERRED STOCK |
|
|
51,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,135 |
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
166,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
166,315 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
245,690 |
|
|
|
319,863 |
|
|
|
1,004,066 |
|
|
|
(85,057 |
) |
|
|
(1,238,872 |
) |
|
|
245,690 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive income |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
413,245 |
|
|
|
321,042 |
|
|
|
1,004,066 |
|
|
|
(65,057 |
) |
|
|
(1,260,051 |
) |
|
|
413,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,773,768 |
|
|
$ |
2,067,971 |
|
|
$ |
1,610,635 |
|
|
$ |
431,591 |
|
|
$ |
(1,730,843 |
) |
|
$ |
4,153,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
489,104 |
|
|
$ |
6,387 |
|
|
$ |
(7,100 |
) |
|
$ |
489,131 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,301 |
|
|
|
65,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
554,410 |
|
|
|
6,387 |
|
|
|
(7,100 |
) |
|
|
556,738 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,120 |
|
|
|
14,651 |
|
|
|
(7,100 |
) |
|
|
163,671 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
128,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,179 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown
separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
79,574 |
|
|
|
4,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,496 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
44,557 |
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,493 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
407,958 |
|
|
|
20,440 |
|
|
|
(7,100 |
) |
|
|
423,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
146,452 |
|
|
|
(14,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,138 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,172 |
|
|
|
(2,013 |
) |
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
(18,063 |
) |
|
|
54,574 |
|
Earnings from consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(55,657 |
) |
|
|
(122,588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(12,458 |
) |
|
|
(28,269 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
18,063 |
|
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment
securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(53,108 |
) |
|
|
(88,431 |
) |
|
|
(2,021 |
) |
|
|
11,833 |
|
|
|
178,245 |
|
|
|
46,518 |
|
Income (loss) before provision
for income taxes |
|
|
53,108 |
|
|
|
89,170 |
|
|
|
148,473 |
|
|
|
(25,886 |
) |
|
|
(178,245 |
) |
|
|
86,620 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
55,658 |
|
|
$ |
148,473 |
|
|
$ |
(25,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(178,245 |
) |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
332,920 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
332,920 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
60,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
393,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,116 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,247 |
|
|
|
3,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,524 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,816 |
|
|
|
115,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,982 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
56,140 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,220 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,611 |
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,615 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,615 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
316,549 |
|
|
|
7,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,657 |
|
|
|
(7,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,394 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,820 |
|
|
|
25,532 |
|
|
|
(2,247 |
) |
|
|
5,019 |
|
|
|
(10,313 |
) |
|
|
24,811 |
|
Earnings from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(36,042 |
) |
|
|
(66,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
(13,840 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
10,313 |
|
|
|
(4,386 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(29,829 |
) |
|
|
(55,542 |
) |
|
|
(2,272 |
) |
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
103,479 |
|
|
|
20,628 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
29,829 |
|
|
|
55,542 |
|
|
|
78,929 |
|
|
|
(12,055 |
) |
|
|
(103,479 |
) |
|
|
48,766 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
29,829 |
|
|
$ |
36,042 |
|
|
$ |
78,929 |
|
|
$ |
(12,055 |
) |
|
$ |
(103,479 |
) |
|
$ |
29,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,895 |
|
|
$ |
1,407,902 |
|
|
$ |
16,153 |
|
|
$ |
(17,962 |
) |
|
$ |
1,407,988 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,947 |
|
|
|
227,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,842 |
|
|
|
1,635,567 |
|
|
|
16,153 |
|
|
|
(17,962 |
) |
|
|
1,644,600 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and
amortization expense shown
separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,068 |
|
|
|
37,127 |
|
|
|
(17,962 |
) |
|
|
471,233 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,617 |
|
|
|
429,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437,925 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown
separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
225,638 |
|
|
|
14,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,150 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
123,463 |
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
1,231,894 |
|
|
|
53,843 |
|
|
|
(17,962 |
) |
|
|
1,276,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
403,673 |
|
|
|
(37,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,877 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,309 |
|
|
|
(5,381 |
) |
|
|
32,832 |
|
|
|
(47,042 |
) |
|
|
152,718 |
|
Earnings from consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(141,359 |
) |
|
|
(340,462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(21,202 |
) |
|
|
(68,878 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(1,907 |
) |
|
|
47,042 |
|
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment
securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(147,554 |
) |
|
|
(236,285 |
) |
|
|
(5,404 |
) |
|
|
30,925 |
|
|
|
481,821 |
|
|
|
123,503 |
|
Income (loss) before provision
for income taxes |
|
|
147,554 |
|
|
|
238,179 |
|
|
|
409,077 |
|
|
|
(68,615 |
) |
|
|
(481,821 |
) |
|
|
244,374 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
|
$ |
141,359 |
|
|
$ |
409,077 |
|
|
$ |
(68,615 |
) |
|
$ |
(481,821 |
) |
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
916,179 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
916,179 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,300 |
|
|
|
168,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,300 |
|
|
|
1,084,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,093,771 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,546 |
|
|
|
4,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313,510 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,022 |
|
|
|
321,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,898 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown
separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
160,850 |
|
|
|
10,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,921 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,187 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,300 |
|
|
|
898,222 |
|
|
|
15,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,249 |
|
|
|
(15,757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,492 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,820 |
|
|
|
71,638 |
|
|
|
(5,481 |
) |
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
(28,566 |
) |
|
|
67,408 |
|
Earnings from consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(76,073 |
) |
|
|
(154,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(1,936 |
) |
|
|
(40,505 |
) |
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
28,566 |
|
|
|
(15,106 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(71,189 |
) |
|
|
(123,317 |
) |
|
|
(6,403 |
) |
|
|
22,444 |
|
|
|
231,087 |
|
|
|
52,622 |
|
Income (loss) before provision
for income taxes |
|
|
71,189 |
|
|
|
123,317 |
|
|
|
192,652 |
|
|
|
(38,201 |
) |
|
|
(231,087 |
) |
|
|
117,870 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
71,189 |
|
|
$ |
76,072 |
|
|
$ |
192,652 |
|
|
$ |
(38,201 |
) |
|
$ |
(231,087 |
) |
|
$ |
70,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
|
$ |
141,359 |
|
|
$ |
409,077 |
|
|
$ |
(68,615 |
) |
|
$ |
(481,821 |
) |
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
123,463 |
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,120 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,582 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,449 |
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,876 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,654 |
|
|
|
(30,658 |
) |
|
|
2,657 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(5,159 |
) |
|
|
(3,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,523 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
Impairment loss in investment securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,257 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,971 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(156,781 |
) |
|
|
(338,814 |
) |
|
|
(188,771 |
) |
|
|
(3,191 |
) |
|
|
716,536 |
|
|
|
28,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
(102,124 |
) |
|
|
371,430 |
|
|
|
(33,534 |
) |
|
|
204,057 |
|
|
|
440,450 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,236 |
) |
|
|
(364,009 |
) |
|
|
(95,246 |
) |
|
|
(14,210 |
) |
|
|
(525,701 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,172 |
) |
|
|
(7,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,523 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
Cash used in business acquisitions |
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(669 |
) |
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(2,037,803 |
) |
|
|
(1,320,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,358,427 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
1,884,172 |
|
|
|
1,617,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,501,457 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
294 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities |
|
|
(154,300 |
) |
|
|
242,809 |
|
|
|
(371,303 |
) |
|
|
(95,508 |
) |
|
|
(14,210 |
) |
|
|
(392,512 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,021 |
|
Proceeds from long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,000 |
|
|
|
(196,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from 91/4% Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,500 |
|
Proceeds initial public offering |
|
|
862,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862,500 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,120 |
) |
Cost of raising capital |
|
|
(44,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,225 |
) |
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,484 |
) |
|
|
5,484 |
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
823,423 |
|
|
|
432,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,255 |
|
|
|
(189,847 |
) |
|
|
1,254,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
669,744 |
|
|
|
573,678 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
59,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302,762 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
15,714 |
|
|
|
99,301 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
46,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
685,458 |
|
|
$ |
672,979 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
$ |
105,439 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,464,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
71,189 |
|
|
$ |
76,072 |
|
|
$ |
192,652 |
|
|
$ |
(38,201 |
) |
|
$ |
(231,087 |
) |
|
$ |
70,625 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,187 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,233 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,365 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
2,505 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
28,566 |
|
|
|
(28,566 |
) |
|
|
3,702 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(611 |
) |
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
42,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,792 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,750 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(47,568 |
) |
|
|
(307,695 |
) |
|
|
98,019 |
|
|
|
17,567 |
|
|
|
287,134 |
|
|
|
47,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
24,865 |
|
|
|
(189,657 |
) |
|
|
411,999 |
|
|
|
9,436 |
|
|
|
28,045 |
|
|
|
284,688 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,700 |
) |
|
|
(414,320 |
) |
|
|
(36,844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(453,864 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(280,971 |
) |
|
|
(456,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(737,088 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
268,079 |
|
|
|
632,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,189 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
|
(834 |
) |
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,291 |
) |
Purchases of FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
Deposits to FCC for licenses |
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(213,726 |
) |
|
|
170,877 |
|
|
|
(409,512 |
) |
|
|
(36,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(489,255 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,993 |
|
Proceeds from bridge credit agreements |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Proceeds from long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,045 |
|
|
|
(30,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(15,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,313 |
) |
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,446 |
) |
Proceeds from minority interest in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
185,576 |
|
|
|
22,993 |
|
|
|
(2,446 |
) |
|
|
30,045 |
|
|
|
(28,045 |
) |
|
|
208,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(3,285 |
) |
|
|
4,213 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,556 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
10,623 |
|
|
|
95,772 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
6,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
7,338 |
|
|
$ |
99,985 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
8,682 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
116,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
16. Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS No. 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands
disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company will be required
to adopt SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. The Company has not completed its
evaluation of the effect of SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, (SFAS No. 159),
which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities
with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets
and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No.
159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company will be required
to adopt SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008. The Company has not completed its evaluation of the
effect of SFAS No. 159.
26
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements made in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995, as amended, and should be evaluated as such.
Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future results of
operations, including statements that may relate to our plans, objectives, strategies, goals,
future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs and other
information that is not historical information. These forward-looking statements often include
words such as anticipate, expect, suggests, plan, believe, intend, estimates,
targets, projects, would, should, could, may, will, forecast, and other similar
expressions. These forward-looking statements are contained throughout this report, including
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We base these forward-looking statements or projections on our current expectations, plans and
assumptions that we have made in light of our experience in the industry, as well as our
perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other
factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. As you read and consider this report,
you should understand that these forward-looking statements or projections are not guarantees of
future performance or results. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements and
projections are based on reasonable assumptions at the time they are made, you should be aware that
many factors could affect our actual financial results, performance or results of operations and
could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements and projections. Factors that may materially affect such forward-looking statements and
projections include:
|
|
|
the highly competitive nature of our industry; |
|
|
|
|
the rapid technological changes in our industry; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain adequate customer care and manage our churn rate; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to sustain the growth rates we are projecting; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to access the funds necessary to build and operate our Expansion Markets; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to construct and launch our Expansion Markets within our projected
timeframes; |
|
|
|
|
the costs associated with being a public company and our ability to comply with the
internal financial and disclosure controls and reporting obligations of public companies; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage our rapid growth, train additional personnel and improve our
financial and disclosure controls and procedures; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to secure the necessary spectrum and network infrastructure equipment; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to clear the Expansion Market spectrum of incumbent licensees; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to adequately enforce or protect our intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulation of our services and the costs of compliance and any failure to
comply with such regulations; |
|
|
|
|
our capital structure, including our indebtedness amounts; |
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer preferences or demand for our products; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to attract and retain key members of management; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors described under Risk Factors disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors. |
27
The forward-looking statements and projections are subject to and involve risks, uncertainties
and assumptions and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and
projections. All future written and oral forward-looking statements and projections attributable to
us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by our cautionary
statements. We do not intend to, and do not undertake a duty to, update any forward-looking
statement or projection in the future to reflect the occurrence of events or circumstances, except
as required by law.
Company Overview
Except as expressly stated, the financial condition and results of operations discussed
throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
are those of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to
MetroPCS, MetroPCS Communications, our Company, the Company, we, our, ours and us
refer to MetroPCS Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Unless otherwise indicated, all share numbers and per share prices give effect to a 3 for 1 stock
split effected by means of a stock dividend of two shares of common stock for each share of common
stock issued and outstanding at the close of business on March 14, 2007. On April 18, 2007, the
registration statement for our initial public offering became effective and our common stock began
trading on New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PCS on April 19, 2007.
We are a wireless telecommunications carrier that currently offers wireless broadband personal
communication services, or PCS, primarily in the greater Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Los
Angeles, Miami, San Francisco, Sacramento and Tampa/Sarasota/Orlando metropolitan areas. We
launched service in the greater Atlanta, Miami and Sacramento metropolitan areas in the first
quarter of 2002; in San Francisco in September 2002; in Tampa/Sarasota in October 2005; in
Dallas/Ft. Worth in March 2006; in Detroit in April 2006; in Orlando in November 2006; and in Los
Angeles in September 2007. In 2005, Royal Street Communications, LLC, or Royal Street
Communications, and with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, Royal Street), a company in
which we own 85% of the limited liability company member interest and with which we have a
wholesale arrangement allowing us to sell MetroPCS-branded services to the public, was granted
licenses by the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, in Los Angeles and various metropolitan
areas throughout northern Florida. We commenced commercial services in Orlando and certain portions
of northern Florida in November 2006 and Los Angeles in September 2007 through our arrangements
with Royal Street.
As a result of the significant growth we have experienced since we launched operations, our
results of operations to date are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected in
future periods. Moreover, we expect that our number of customers will continue to increase, which
will continue to contribute to increases in our revenues and operating expenses. In November 2006,
we were granted advanced wireless services, or AWS, licenses covering a total unique population of
approximately 117 million for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.4 billion.
Approximately 69 million of the total licensed population associated with our Auction 66 licenses
represents expansion opportunities in geographic areas outside of our current operating markets,
which we refer to as our Auction 66 Markets. These new expansion opportunities in our Auction 66
Markets cover six of the 25 largest metropolitan areas in the United States. The balance of our
Auction 66 Markets, which cover a population of approximately 48 million, supplements or expands
the geographic boundaries of our existing operations in Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Los Angeles, San
Francisco and Sacramento. We currently plan to focus on building out approximately 40 million of
the total population in our Auction 66 Markets with a primary focus on the New York, Philadelphia,
Boston and Las Vegas metropolitan areas. Of the approximate 40 million total population, we are
targeting launch of operations with an initial covered population of approximately 30 to 32 million
by late 2008 or early 2009. Our initial launch dates will vary in our Auction 66 Markets and our
launch dates in the larger metropolitan areas may be accomplished in phases. Our Auction 66 Markets
will entail a more extensive use of distributed antenna systems, or DAS, systems than we have
deployed in the past. This, along with other factors, could result in an increase in the total
capital expenditures per covered population to initially launch operations, however, we would not
expect the estimate of total cash expenditures to reach free cash flow positive to be materially
impacted. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and our
anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fully fund this planned expansion.
We sell products and services to customers through our Company-owned retail stores as well as
indirectly through relationships with independent retailers. We offer service which allows our
customers to place unlimited local calls from within our local service area and to receive
unlimited calls from any area while in our local service
28
area, through flat rate monthly plans starting at $30 per month. For an additional $5 to $20
per month, our customers may select a service plan that offers additional services, such as
unlimited nationwide long distance service, voicemail, caller ID, call waiting, enhanced directory
assistance, text messaging, mobile Internet browsing, push e-mail, mobile instant messaging and
picture and multimedia messaging. We offer flat rate monthly plans at $30, $35, $40, $45 and $50.
All of these plans require payment in advance for one month of service. If no payment is made in
advance for the following month of service, service is discontinued at the end of the month that
was paid for by the customer. For additional fees, we also provide international long distance and
text messaging, ringtones, games and content applications, unlimited directory assistance, ring
back tones, nationwide roaming and other value-added services. As of September 30, 2007, over 85%
of our customers have selected either our $40, $45 or $50 rate plans. Our flat rate plans
differentiate our service from the more complex plans and long-term contract requirements of
traditional wireless carriers. In addition, the above products and services are offered by us in
the Royal Street markets. Our arrangements with Royal Street are based on a wholesale model under
which we purchase up to 85% of the network capacity of Royal Streets systems from Royal Street to
allow us to offer our standard products and services in the Royal Street markets to MetroPCS
customers under the MetroPCS brand name.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. We have
discussed those estimates that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in
their application in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of OperationsCritical Accounting Policies and Estimates of our 2006 Form 10-K filed with
the SEC on March 30, 2007. Our accounting policy for income taxes was recently modified due to the
adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48) and is described below.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty
in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48
provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition.
FIN 48 requires significant judgment in determining what constitutes an individual tax position as
well as assessing the outcome of each tax position. Changes in judgment as to recognition or
measurement of tax positions can materially affect the estimate of the effective tax rate and
consequently, affect our operating results.
Other than the adoption of FIN 48, our critical accounting policies and the methodologies and
assumptions we apply under them have not materially changed from our 2006 Form 10-K.
Customer Recognition and Disconnect Policies
When a new customer subscribes to our service, the first month of service and activation fee
is included with the handset purchase. Under GAAP, we are required to allocate the purchase price
to the handset and to the wireless service revenue. Generally, the amount allocated to the handset
will be less than our cost, and this difference is included in Cost Per Gross Addition, or CPGA. We
recognize new customers as gross customer additions upon activation of service. Prior to January
23, 2006, we offered our customers the Metro Promise, which allowed a customer to return a newly
purchased handset for a full refund prior to the earlier of 7 days or 60 minutes of use. Beginning
on January 23, 2006, we expanded the terms of the Metro Promise to allow a customer to return a
newly purchased handset for a full refund prior to the earlier of 30 days or 60 minutes of use.
Customers who return their phones under the Metro Promise are reflected as a reduction to gross
customer additions. Customers monthly service payments are due in advance every month. Our
customers must pay their monthly service amount by the payment date or their service will be
suspended, or hotlined, and the customer will not be able to make or receive calls on our network.
However, a hotlined customer is still able to make E-911 calls in the event of an emergency. There
is no service grace period. Any call attempted by a hotlined customer is routed directly to our
interactive voice response system and customer service center in order to arrange payment. If the
customer pays the amount due within 30 days of the original payment date then the customers
service is restored. If a hotlined customer does not
29
pay the amount due within 30 days of the payment date the account is disconnected and counted
as churn. Once an account is disconnected we charge a $15 reconnect fee upon reactivation to
reestablish service and the revenue associated with this fee is deferred and recognized over the
estimated life of the customer.
Revenues
We derive our revenues from the following sources:
Service. We sell wireless broadband PCS services. The various types of service revenues
associated with wireless broadband PCS for our customers include monthly recurring charges for
airtime, monthly recurring charges for optional features (including nationwide long distance and
text messaging, ringtones, games and content applications, unlimited directory assistance, ring
back tones, mobile Internet browsing, mobile instant messaging, push e-mail and nationwide roaming)
and charges for long distance service. Service revenues also include intercarrier compensation and
nonrecurring activation service charges to customers.
Equipment. We sell wireless broadband PCS handsets and accessories that are used by our
customers in connection with our wireless services. This equipment is also sold to our independent
retailers to facilitate distribution to our customers.
Costs and Expenses
Our costs and expenses include:
Cost of Service. The major components of our cost of service are:
|
|
|
Cell Site Costs. We incur expenses for the rent of cell sites, network
facilities, engineering operations, field technicians and related utility and
maintenance charges. |
|
|
|
|
Intercarrier Compensation. We pay charges to other telecommunications companies
for their transport and termination of calls originated by our customers and destined
for customers of other networks. These variable charges are based on our customers
usage and generally applied at pre-negotiated rates with other carriers, although some
carriers have sought to impose such charges unilaterally. |
|
|
|
|
Variable Long Distance. We pay charges to other telecommunications companies for
long distance service provided to our customers. These variable charges are based on our
customers usage, applied at pre-negotiated rates with the long distance carriers. |
Cost of Equipment. We purchase wireless broadband PCS handsets and accessories from
third-party vendors to resell to our customers and independent retailers in connection with our
services. We subsidize the sale of handsets to encourage the sale and use of our services. We do
not manufacture any of this equipment.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling expense includes advertising and
promotional costs associated with marketing and selling to new customers and fixed charges such as
retail store rent and retail associates salaries. General and administrative expense includes
support functions including, technical operations, finance, accounting, human resources,
information technology and legal services. We record stock-based compensation expense in cost of
service and in selling, general and administrative expenses for expense associated with employee
stock options, which is measured at the date of grant, based on the estimated fair value of the
award.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation is applied using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets once the assets are placed in service, which are ten years for
network infrastructure assets and capitalized interest, three to seven years for office equipment,
which includes computer equipment, three to seven years for furniture and fixtures and five years
for vehicles. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the respective leases, which
includes renewal periods that are reasonably assured, or the estimated useful life of the
improvement, whichever is shorter.
30
Interest Expense and Interest Income. Interest expense includes interest incurred on our
borrowings, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of discounts and premiums on
long-term debt. Interest income is earned primarily on our cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments.
Income Taxes. As a result of our operating losses and accelerated depreciation available under
federal tax laws, we have paid no significant federal or state income taxes through September 30,
2007.
Seasonality
Our customer activity is influenced by seasonal effects related to traditional retail selling
periods and other factors that arise from our target customer base. Based on historical results, we
generally expect net customer additions to be strongest in the first and fourth quarters. Softening
of sales and increased customer turnover, or churn, in the second and third quarters of the year
usually combine to result in fewer net customer additions. However, sales activity and churn can be
strongly affected by the launch of new markets and promotional activity, which have the ability to
reduce or outweigh certain seasonal effects.
Operating Segments
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131 Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
As of September 30, 2007, we had twelve operating segments based on geographic region within
the United States: Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Los Angeles, Miami, Sacramento, San
Francisco, Tampa/Orlando/Jacksonville, Boston, Las Vegas, New York and Philadelphia. Each of these
operating segments provide wireless voice and data services and products to customers in its
service areas or is currently constructing a network in order to provide these services. These
services include unlimited local and long distance calling, voicemail, caller ID, call waiting,
enhanced directory assistance, text messaging, picture and multimedia messaging, international long
distance and text messaging, ringtones, games and content applications, unlimited directory
assistance, ring back tones, nationwide roaming, mobile Internet browsing, mobile instant
messaging, push e-mail and other value-added services.
We aggregate our operating segments into two reportable segments: Core Markets and Expansion
Markets.
|
|
|
Core Markets, which include Atlanta, Miami, Sacramento and San Francisco, are
aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision
maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes,
class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and currently exhibit
similar financial performance and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets, which include Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Los Angeles,
Tampa/Orlando/Jacksonville, Boston, Las Vegas, New York and Philadelphia, are aggregated
because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision maker, they
are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes, class of
customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and have similar expected
long-term financial performance and economic characteristics. |
General corporate overhead, which includes expenses such as corporate employee labor costs,
rent and utilities, legal, accounting and auditing expenses, is allocated equally across all
operating segments. Corporate marketing and advertising expenses are allocated equally to the
operating segments, beginning in the period during which we launch service in that operating
segment. Expenses associated with our national data center and national operations center are
allocated based on the average number of customers in each operating segment. There are no
transactions between reportable segments.
Interest expense, interest income, gain/loss on extinguishment of debt and income taxes are
not allocated to the segments in the computation of segment operating results for internal
evaluation purposes.
31
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
Set forth below is a summary of certain financial information by reportable operating segment
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Operating Segment Data |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
358,245 |
|
|
$ |
285,313 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
130,886 |
|
|
|
47,607 |
|
|
|
175 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
489,131 |
|
|
$ |
332,920 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
48,165 |
|
|
$ |
50,594 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
19,442 |
|
|
|
12,602 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
67,607 |
|
|
$ |
63,196 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
disclosed separately below) (1):
Core Markets |
|
$ |
108,077 |
|
|
$ |
83,498 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
55,594 |
|
|
|
30,026 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
163,671 |
|
|
$ |
113,524 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
87,232 |
|
|
$ |
87,614 |
|
|
|
(0 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
43,947 |
|
|
|
30,368 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
131,179 |
|
|
$ |
117,982 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation
and amortization disclosed
separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
40,651 |
|
|
$ |
38,541 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
43,845 |
|
|
|
21,679 |
|
|
|
102 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
84,496 |
|
|
$ |
60,220 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit)(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
170,983 |
|
|
$ |
128,283 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
(20,112 |
) |
|
|
167 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
30,691 |
|
|
$ |
28,796 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
12,769 |
|
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
120 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
45,493 |
|
|
$ |
36,611 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
$ |
2,030 |
|
|
|
(74 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
275 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,107 |
|
|
$ |
3,781 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
140,752 |
|
|
$ |
98,864 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
(5,587 |
) |
|
|
(28,545 |
) |
|
|
80 |
% |
Other |
|
|
(2,027 |
) |
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
133,138 |
|
|
$ |
69,394 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses include stock-based
compensation expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2007, cost of service includes
$0.6 million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $6.5 million of
stock-based compensation expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, cost of
service includes $0.5 million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $3.3
million of stock-based compensation expense. |
|
(2) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) is presented in accordance with SFAS No.
131 as it is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of
our ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements
and to fund future growth. |
32
Service Revenues. Service revenues increased $156.2 million, or 47%, to $489.1 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 from $332.9 million for the three months ended September 30,
2006. The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets service revenues as
follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets service revenues increased $72.9 million, or 26%, to $358.2
million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $285.3 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in service revenues is primarily attributable
to net additions of approximately 404,000 customers for the twelve months ended September
30, 2007, which accounted for $50.8 million of the Core Markets increase, coupled with the
migration of existing customers to higher priced rate plans
accounting for $5.4 million of
the Core Markets increase. In addition, E-911, Federal Universal
Service Fund, or FUSF, vendors compensation and activation revenues increased
approximately $16.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared
to the same period in 2006 primarily as a result of the increase in customers during the
twelve months ended September 30, 2007 and higher FUSF rates. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets service revenues increased $83.3 million, or 175%,
to $130.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $47.6 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in service revenues is primarily
attributable to net additions of approximately 644,000 customers for the twelve months
ended September 30, 2007, which accounted for $69.3 million of the Expansion Markets
increase. In addition, the migration of existing customers to higher priced rate plans
accounting for $14.0 million of the Expansion Markets increase. |
|
|
|
|
The increase in customers migrating to higher priced rate plans is primarily the result of
our emphasis on offering additional services under our $45 and $50 rate plans. |
Equipment Revenues. Equipment revenues increased $4.4 million, or 7%, to $67.6 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 from $63.2 million for the three months ended September 30,
2006. The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets equipment revenues,
partially offset by a decrease in Core Markets equipment revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets equipment revenues decreased $2.4 million, or 5%, to $48.2
million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $50.6 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2006. The decrease in equipment revenues is primarily
attributable to the sale of lower priced handset models which accounted for $6.7 million of
the decrease. This decrease in equipment revenues was partially offset by an increase in
gross additions of approximately 32,000 customers for the three months ended September 30,
2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 which accounted for $4.3 million. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets equipment revenues increased $6.8 million, or 54%,
to $19.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $12.6 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in equipment revenues is primarily
attributable to an increase in gross additions of approximately 63,000 customers for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006, which
accounted for $4.1 million of the Expansion Markets increase, coupled with the sale of
higher priced handset models accounting for $2.7 million of the Expansion Markets increase. |
Cost of Service. Cost of service increased $50.2 million, or 44%, to $163.7 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 from $113.5 million for the three months ended September 30,
2006. The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets cost of service as
follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of service increased $24.6 million, or 29%, to $108.1
million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $83.5 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2006. Core Markets cost of
service (excluding E-911 and FUSF expenses) increased $8.9 million,
or 12%, to $82.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from
$74.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The
increase was primarily attributable to a $4.7 million increase in customer service expense,
a $1.8 million increase in cell site and switch facility lease expense and
a $1.1 million increase in intercarrier compensation, all of which are as
a result of the 19% growth in our Core Markets customer base and the deployment of additional
network infrastructure during the twelve months ended September 30, 2007.
In addition, E-911 and FUSF expenses increased approximately $15.7 million
during the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 primarily
as a result of the increase in customers during the twelve months ended September 30, 2007 and
higher FUSF rates. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of service increased $25.6 million, or 85%,
to $55.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $30.0 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase was attributable to the expansion of
the Tampa/Sarasota area to include the Orlando metropolitan area in November 2006 and the
launch of service in the Los Angeles metropolitan area in |
33
|
|
|
September 2007 as well as substantial net additions in other Expansion Markets. The Expansion
Markets contributed to net additions of approximately 644,000 customers during the twelve
months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in cost of service is primarily attributable to
a $7.5 million increase in cell site and switch facility lease expense, a $4.6 million
increase in customer service expense, a $3.7 million increase in intercarrier compensation, a
$3.0 million increase in employee costs, a $2.6 million increase in long distance costs and a
$1.4 million increase in billing expenses. |
Cost of Equipment. Cost of equipment increased $13.2 million, or 11%, to $131.2 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $118.0 million for the three months ended September
30, 2006. The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets cost of equipment,
partially offset by a slight decrease in Core Markets cost of equipment as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of equipment decreased $0.4 million to $87.2 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $87.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2006. The decrease in cost of equipment is primarily attributable to the
sale of lower priced handset models which accounted for $7.8 million of the decrease. This
decrease in cost of equipment was partially offset by an increase in gross additions of
approximately 32,000 customers for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to
the same period in 2006 which accounted for an increase of $7.4 million. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of equipment increased $13.6 million, or 45%,
to $44.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $30.4 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006. The Expansion Markets contributed to an increase in
gross additions of approximately 63,000 customers for the three months ended September 30,
2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 which accounted for $9.9 million of the
Expansion Markets increase, coupled with the sale of higher priced
handset models accounting for $3.7 million of the Expansion Markets increase. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $24.3 million, or 40%, to $84.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007
from $60.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase is due to increases
in Core Markets and Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2.1
million, or 5%, to $40.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $38.5
million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Selling expenses increased by $2.1
million, or approximately 12% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in selling expenses is primarily due to
a $2.0 million increase in marketing and advertising expenses incurred to support the
growth in the Core Markets. General and administrative expenses remained relatively flat
for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $22.2 million, or 102%, to $43.9 million for the three months ended September 30,
2007 from $21.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Selling expenses
increased by $7.5 million, or approximately 86% for the three months ended September 30,
2007 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006. This increase is primarily due
to a $4.2 million increase in marketing and advertising expenses related to the Expansion
Markets as well as higher labor costs of $2.3 million. General and administrative expenses
increased by $14.7 million, or approximately 113% for the three months ended September 30,
2007 compared to the same period in 2006 primarily due to a $1.2 million increase in labor
costs, a $1.1 million increase in property taxes, a
$0.9 million increase in credit card transaction fees as well as an increase in various administrative expenses incurred in relation to the growth
in the Expansion Markets, including the launch of service in the Los Angeles metropolitan
area and build-out expenses related to the New York, Philadelphia, Boston and Las Vegas
metropolitan areas. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $8.9 million,
or 24%, to $45.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $36.6 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily due to increases in Core Markets
and Expansion Markets depreciation expense as follows:
34
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.9
million, or 7%, to $30.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $28.8
million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase related primarily to an
increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve months
ended September 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased
$5.9 million, or 85%, to $12.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from
$6.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase related primarily
to an increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve
months ended September 30, 2007 driven by primarily by the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota
area to include the Orlando metropolitan area and the launch of service in the Los Angeles
metropolitan area. |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. Stock-based compensation expense increased $3.3 million, or
88%, to $7.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $3.8 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2006. The increase is due primarily to increases in Expansion Markets
stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by decreases in Core Markets stock-based
compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets stock-based compensation expense decreased $1.5 million, or
74%, to $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $2.0 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2006. The decrease is primarily related to the
allocation of quarter expense from the Core Markets to the Expansion Markets. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $4.8
million, or 275%, to $6.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $1.8
million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily related to
an increase in stock options granted to employees in these markets throughout the twelve
months ended September 30, 2007 as well as the allocation of quarter expense to the
Expansion Markets from the Core Markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Consolidated Data |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
54,574 |
|
|
24,811 |
|
|
120 |
% |
Impairment
loss on investment securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
* * |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
33,512 |
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
72 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
53,108 |
|
|
29,266 |
|
|
81 |
% |
* * Not
meaningful.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $29.8 million, or 120%, to $54.6 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 from $24.8 million for the three months ended September 30,
2006. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to an increased average principal balance
outstanding as a result of borrowings of $1.6 billion under our senior secured credit facility and
the issuance of $1.0 billion of 91/4% Senior Notes due 2014, or the initial notes, during the fourth
quarter of 2006. The Company also issued an additional $400 million of the 91/4% Senior Notes due
2014, or the additional notes, during the second quarter of 2007 resulting in an average debt
outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2007 of $3.0 billion. The average debt
outstanding under our previous debt facilities for the three months ending September 30, 2006 was
$1.1 billion. The weighted average interest rate decreased to 8.13% for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to 10.99% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as a result of
the borrowing rates under the senior secured credit facility, issuance of the initial notes and
additional notes, referred to together as the 91/4% senior notes, and the impact of the interest rate
hedge. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by the capitalization of $8.4 million
of interest during the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $7.6 million of interest
capitalized during the same period in 2006. We capitalize interest costs associated with our FCC
licenses and property and equipment during the construction of a new market. The amount of such
capitalized interest depends on the carrying values of the FCC licenses and construction in
progress involved in those markets and the duration of the construction process. We expect
capitalized interest to be significant during the construction of the Auction 66 Markets.
Impairment
Loss on Investment Securities. We can and have historically invested our substantial cash balances
in, among other things, securities issued and fully guaranteed by
the United States or any state, highly rated commercial
paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria,
and demand deposits. These investments are subject to credit, liquidity,
market and interest rate risk. For example, we have made investments of approximately
$134.0 million in certain AAA rated auction rate securities that
are collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying collateral
being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. As a result of
the lack of liquidity in this market, these securities have failed to attract a buyer at
scheduled auctions for these securities. As a result, we recognized an
other-than-temporary impairment loss on investment securities in the amount
of $15.0 million during the period ended September 30, 2007.
Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007
increased to $33.5 million, which is approximately 39% of our income before provision for income
taxes. For the three months
35
ended September 30, 2006 the provision for income taxes was $19.5 million, or approximately
40% of income before provision for income taxes.
Net Income. Net income increased $23.8 million, or 81%, to $53.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to $29.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006.
The increase is primarily attributable to a 40% growth in customers during the twelve months ended
September 30, 2007 which contributed to an increase in net income during the third quarter of 2007.
In addition, the increase in operating income was achieved through cost benefits due to the
increase scale of our business in the Core and Expansion Markets. However, these benefits have been
partially offset by an increase in interest expense due to a increase in the Companys average debt
outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.
36
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
Set forth below is a summary of certain financial information by reportable operating segment
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Operating Segment Data |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
1,051,727 |
|
|
$ |
831,053 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
356,261 |
|
|
|
85,126 |
|
|
|
319 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,407,988 |
|
|
$ |
916,179 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
168,535 |
|
|
$ |
149,200 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
68,077 |
|
|
|
28,392 |
|
|
|
140 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
236,612 |
|
|
$ |
177,592 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
disclosed separately below) (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
319,123 |
|
|
$ |
244,636 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
152,110 |
|
|
|
68,874 |
|
|
|
121 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
471,233 |
|
|
$ |
313,510 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
290,160 |
|
|
$ |
261,258 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
147,765 |
|
|
|
69,640 |
|
|
|
112 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
437,925 |
|
|
$ |
330,898 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation
and amortization disclosed
separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
128,335 |
|
|
$ |
114,021 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
111,815 |
|
|
|
57,900 |
|
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
240,150 |
|
|
$ |
171,921 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit)(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
489,175 |
|
|
$ |
364,585 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
|
(79,393 |
) |
|
|
132 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
87,008 |
|
|
$ |
80,467 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
34,365 |
|
|
|
13,381 |
|
|
|
157 |
% |
Other |
|
|
4,623 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
125,996 |
|
|
$ |
96,187 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
6,532 |
|
|
$ |
4,246 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
12,439 |
|
|
|
3,504 |
|
|
|
255 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18,971 |
|
|
$ |
7,750 |
|
|
|
145 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
394,378 |
|
|
$ |
269,735 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
(21,670 |
) |
|
|
(96,904 |
) |
|
|
78 |
% |
Other |
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
(2,339 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
367,877 |
|
|
$ |
170,492 |
|
|
|
116 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses include stock-based
compensation expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, cost of service includes
$1.3 million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $17.7 million of
stock-based compensation expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, cost of
service includes $1.0 million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $6.8
million of stock-based compensation expense. |
|
(2) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) is presented in accordance with SFAS No.
131 as it is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of
our ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements
and to fund future growth. |
37
Service Revenues. Service revenues increased $491.8 million, or 54%, to $1.4 billion for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $916.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006. The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets service revenues as
follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets service revenues increased $220.6 million, or 27%, to $1.1
billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $831.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in service revenues is primarily attributable
to net additions of approximately 404,000 customers for the twelve months ended September
30, 2007, which accounted for $147.8 million of the Core Markets increase, coupled with the
migration of existing customers to higher priced rate plans
accounting for $28.2 million of
the Core Markets increase. In addition, E-911, FUSF,
vendors compensation and activation revenues increased approximately
$44.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared
to the same period in 2006 primarily as a result of the
increase in customers during the twelve months ended September 30,
2007 and higher FUSF rates. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets service revenues increased $271.2 million, or
319%, to $356.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $85.1 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in service revenues is primarily
attributable to net additions of approximately 644,000 customers for the twelve months
ended September 30, 2007, which accounted for $124.0 million of the Expansion Markets
increase, coupled the migration of existing customers to higher priced rate plans
accounting for $147.2 million of the Expansion Markets increase. |
|
|
|
|
The increase in customers migrating to higher priced rate plans is primarily the result of
our emphasis on offering additional services under our $45 and $50 rate plans. |
Equipment Revenues. Equipment revenues increased $59.0 million, or 33%, to $236.6 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $177.6 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2006. The increase is due to increase in Core Markets and Expansion Markets equipment revenues
as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets equipment revenues increased $19.3 million, or 13%, to
$168.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $149.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in equipment revenues is primarily
attributable to an increase in gross additions of approximately 112,000 customers for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006, which
accounted for $14.2 million of the increase, coupled with the sale of higher priced handset
models accounting for $5.1 million of the increase. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets equipment revenues increased $39.7 million, or
140%, to $68.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $28.4 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in equipment revenues is primarily
attributable an increase in gross additions of approximately 402,000 customers for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006, which accounted for
$24.3 million of the Expansion Markets increase, coupled with the sale of higher priced
handset models accounting for $15.4 million of the Expansion Markets increase. |
Cost of Service. Cost of service increased $157.7 million, or 50%, to $471.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $313.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006. The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets cost of service as
follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of service increased $74.5 million, or 30%, to $319.1
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $244.6 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006. Core Markets cost of service
(excluding E-911 and FUSF expenses) increased $32.6 million,
or 15%, to $247.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 from $214.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
The increase was primarily attributable to a $12.6 million increase
in customer service expense, a $6.9 million increase in cell site and switch
facility lease expense and a $2.9 million increase in
long distance cost, all of which are as a result on the 19% growth in our Core
Markets customer base and the deployment of additional network infrastructure during the twelve
months ended September 30, 2007. In addition, E-911 and FUSF expenses increased
approximately $41.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
compared to the same period in 2006 primarily as a result of the increase in
customers during the twelve months ended September 30, 2007 and
higher FUSF rates. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of service increased $83.2 million, or 121%,
to $152.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $68.9 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase was attributable to the launch of the
Dallas/Ft. Worth metropolitan area in March 2006, the Detroit metropolitan area in April
2006, the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota area to include the Orlando metropolitan area in
November 2006 and the launch of service in the Los Angeles metropolitan area in |
38
|
|
|
September 2007 as well as substantial net additions in other Expansion Markets. The Expansion
Markets contributed to net additions of approximately 644,000 customers during the twelve
months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in cost of service is primarily attributable to
a $19.6 million increase in cell site and switch facility lease expense, a $14.5 million
increase in customer service expense, a $13.0 million increase in intercarrier compensation,
a $10.7 million increase in long distance cost, a $8.6 million increase in employee costs and
a $5.1 million increase in billing expenses. |
Cost of Equipment. Cost of equipment increased $107.0 million, or 32%, to $437.9 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $330.9 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2006. The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets cost of equipment
as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of equipment increased $28.9 million, or 11%, to $290.2
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $261.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in equipment costs is primarily attributable
to the increase in gross customer additions during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
of approximately 112,000 customers as compared to the same period in 2006, which accounted
for $24.8 million of the increase, coupled with the sale of
higher priced handset models
accounting for $4.1 million of the Core Markets increase. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of equipment
increased $78.1 million, or
112%, to $147.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $69.6 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The Expansion Markets contributed to an increase
in gross additions of approximately 402,000 customers for the nine months ended September
30, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 which accounted for
$59.5 million of the
Expansion Markets increase, coupled with the sale of higher priced handset models accounting
for $18.6 million of the Expansion Markets increase. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $68.2 million, or 40%, to $240.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
from $171.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase is due to increases
in Core Markets and Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets selling, general and administrative expenses increased $14.3
million, or 13%, to $128.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $114.0
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Selling expenses increased by $6.5
million, or approximately 13% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in selling expenses is primarily due to
a $3.1 million increase in marketing and advertising expenses as well as higher labor costs
of $1.9 million incurred to support the growth in the Core Markets. General and
administrative expenses increased $7.8 million, or approximately 12% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The
increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to
an increase in credit card transaction
fees and insurance cost as well as an increase in various other administrative expenses. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $53.9 million, or 93%, to $111.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 from $57.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Selling expenses
increased by $19.8 million, or approximately 86%, for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This increase is primarily due
to a $8.7 million increase in marketing and advertising expenses related to the growth in
the Expansion Markets as well as higher labor costs of $8.3 million. General and
administrative expenses increased by $34.1 million, or approximately 98% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 primarily due to a $3.6
million increase in labor costs, a $2.8 million increase in property taxes, a $2.5 million
increase in credit card transaction fees as well as an increase in various administrative expenses incurred in
relation to the growth in the Expansion Markets, including the launch of service in the Los
Angeles metropolitan area and build-out expenses related to the New York, Philadelphia,
Boston and Las Vegas metropolitan areas. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $29.8 million,
or 31%, to $126.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $96.2 million for the
nine months ended
39
September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion
Markets depreciation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased $6.5
million, or 8%, to $87.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $80.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase related primarily to an
increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve months
ended September 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased
$21.0 million, or 157%, to $34.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from
$13.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase related primarily
to an increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve
months ended September 30, 2007 driven in part by the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota area
to include the Orlando metropolitan area and the launch of service in the Los Angeles
metropolitan area. |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. Stock-based compensation expense increased $11.2 million, or
145%, to $19.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $7.8 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006. The increase is due primarily to increases in Core Markets and
Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $2.3 million, or
54%, to $6.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $4.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily related to an increase in
stock options granted throughout the twelve months ended September 30, 2007, partially
offset by the allocation of year-to-date expense from the Core Markets to the Expansion
Markets. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $8.9
million, or 255%, to $12.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $3.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily related to
an increase in stock options granted throughout the twelve months ended September 30, 2007
as well as the allocation of year-to-date expense to the Expansion Markets from the Core
Markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Consolidated Data |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
10,763 |
|
|
(87 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
152,718 |
|
|
67,408 |
|
|
127 |
% |
Impairment
loss on investment securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
* * |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
47,245 |
|
|
105 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
147,554 |
|
|
70,625 |
|
|
109 |
% |
* * Not meaningful.
Loss
on disposal of assets.. Loss on disposal of assets decreased $9.3 million, or
approximately 87%, to $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $10.8 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
certain network technology related to our cell sites in certain markets was retired and replaced
with new technology.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $85.3 million, or 127%, to $152.7 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $67.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to an increased average principal balance
outstanding as a result of borrowings of $1.6 billion under our senior secured credit facility and
the issuance of the initial notes during the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company also issued the
additional notes during the second quarter of 2007 resulting in an average debt outstanding for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 of $2.8 billion. The average debt outstanding under our
previous debt facilities for the nine months ending September 30, 2006 was $960.1 million. The
weighted average interest rate decreased to 8.16% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
compared to 10.67% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as a result of the borrowing rates
under the senior secured credit facility, the 91/4% senior notes and the impact of the interest rate
hedge. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by the capitalization of $21.2 million
of interest during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $11.6
40
million of interest capitalized during the same period in 2006. We capitalize interest costs
associated with our FCC licenses and property and equipment during the construction of a new
market. The amount of such capitalized interest depends on the carrying values of the FCC licenses
and construction in progress involved in those markets and the duration of the construction
process. We expect capitalized interest to be significant during the construction of the Auction 66
Markets.
Impairment Loss on Investment Securities.
We can and have historically invested our substantial cash balances in, among
other things, securities issued and fully guaranteed by the United
States or any state, highly rated commercial paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting
certain criteria, and demand deposits. These investments are subject to
credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. For example, we
have made investments of approximately $134.0 million in certain AAA
rated auction rate securities that are collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the
underlying collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities.
As a result of the lack of liquidity in this market, these securities
have failed to attract a buyer at scheduled auctions for these securities.
As a result, we recognized an other-than-temporary impairment loss on investment securities in
the amount of $15.0 million during the period ended September 30, 2007.
Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
increased to $96.8 million, which is approximately 40% of our income before provision for income
taxes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 the provision for income taxes was $47.2
million, or approximately 40% of income before provision for income taxes.
Net
Income. Net income increased $76.9 million, or 109%, to
$147.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to $70.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
The increase is primarily attributable to a 40% growth in customers during the twelve months ended
September 30, 2007 which contributed to an increase in net income. In addition, the increase in
operating income was achieved through cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in
the Core and Expansion Markets. However, these benefits have been partially offset by an increase
in interest expense due to a increase in the Companys average debt outstanding for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.
Performance Measures
In managing our business and assessing our financial performance, we supplement the
information provided by financial statement measures with several customer-focused performance
metrics that are widely used in the wireless industry. These metrics include average revenue per
user per month, or ARPU, which measures service revenue per customer; cost per gross customer
addition, or CPGA, which measures the average cost of acquiring a new customer; cost per user per
month, or CPU, which measures the non-selling cash cost of operating our business on a per customer
basis; and churn, which measures turnover in our customer base. For a reconciliation of Non-GAAP
performance measures and a further discussion of the measures, please read Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
The following table shows consolidated metric information for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
3,664,218 |
|
|
|
2,616,532 |
|
|
|
3,664,218 |
|
|
|
2,616,532 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
114,302 |
|
|
|
197,623 |
|
|
|
723,232 |
|
|
|
691,911 |
|
Churn: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average monthly rate |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
ARPU |
|
$ |
42.77 |
|
|
$ |
42.78 |
|
|
$ |
43.22 |
|
|
$ |
42.91 |
|
CPGA |
|
$ |
125.92 |
|
|
$ |
120.29 |
|
|
$ |
118.99 |
|
|
$ |
116.56 |
|
CPU |
|
$ |
17.81 |
|
|
$ |
19.15 |
|
|
$ |
18.11 |
|
|
$ |
19.65 |
|
Customers. Net customer additions were 114,302 for the three months ended September 30, 2007,
compared to 197,623 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of 42%. Net customer
additions were 723,232 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to 691,911 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of 5%. Total customers were 3,664,218 as of
September 30, 2007, an increase of 40% over the customer total as of September 30, 2006 and 25%
over the customer total as of December 31, 2006. The increase in total customers is primarily
attributable to the continued demand for our service offerings and the launch of our services in
the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota metropolitan area to include the Orlando metropolitan area in
November 2006. We are seeing signs of an economic slowdown that
could result in a 20% - 30% reduction in net additions during the
fourth quarter of 2007.
Churn. As we do not require a long-term service contract, our churn percentage is expected to
be higher than traditional wireless carriers that require customers to sign a one- to two-year
contract with significant early termination fees. Average monthly churn represents (a) the number
of customers who have been disconnected from our system during the measurement period less the
number of customers who have reactivated service, divided by
41
(b) the sum of the average monthly number of customers during such period. We classify
delinquent customers as churn after they have been delinquent for 30 days. In addition, when an
existing customer establishes a new account in connection with the purchase of an upgraded or
replacement phone and does not identify themselves as an existing customer, we count that phone
leaving service as a churn and the new phone entering service as a gross customer addition. Churn
for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was 5.2% compared to 5.0% for the three months ended
September 30, 2006. Churn increased 0.2% for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 over the three months ended September 30, 2006 due to normal historical
trends related to the maturity of our markets coupled
with continued disconnects from the significant increase in gross additions in the
first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006. Churn for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was 4.7% compared to 4.7%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Our customer
activity is influenced by seasonal effects related to traditional retail selling periods and
other factors that arise from our target customer base. Based on
historical results, we generally expect net customer additions to be strongest in the
first and fourth quarters. Softening of sales and increased churn in the
second and third quarters of the year usually combine to result in
fewer net customer additions during these quarters. Average monthly churn
rate for selected traditional
wireless carriers ranges from 1.0% to 2.6% for post-pay customers and over 6.0% for pre-pay
customers based on public filings or press releases.
Average Revenue Per User. ARPU represents (a) service revenues less activation revenues,
E-911, FUSF, and vendors compensation charges for the
measurement period, divided by (b) the sum of the average monthly number of customers during such
period. ARPU was $42.77 and $42.78 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, a decrease of $0.01. ARPU was $43.22 and $42.91 for the nine months ended September
30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, an increase of $0.31, or 1%. The increase in ARPU for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, was primarily the result of attracting customers to higher priced
rate plans. At September 30, 2007, over 85% of our customers were on the $40 or higher rate plan.
Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA is determined by dividing (a) selling expenses plus the total
cost of equipment associated with transactions with new customers less activation revenues and
equipment revenues associated with transactions with new customers during the measurement period by
(b) gross customer additions during such period. Retail customer service expenses and equipment
margin on handsets sold to existing customers when they are identified, including handset upgrade
transactions, are excluded, as these costs are incurred specifically for existing customers. CPGA
costs have increased to $125.92 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $120.29 for the
three months ended September 30, 2006, which was primarily driven by the selling expenses
associated with the customer growth in our Expansion Markets. CPGA costs have increased to $118.99
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $116.56 for the nine months ended September 30,
2006, which was primarily driven by the selling expenses associated with the customer growth in our
Expansion Markets.
Cost Per User. CPU is cost of service and general and administrative costs (excluding
applicable non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of service and general and
administrative expense) plus net loss on handset equipment transactions unrelated to initial
customer acquisition (which includes the gain or loss on sale of handsets to existing customers and
costs associated with handset replacements and repairs (other than warranty costs which are the
responsibility of the handset manufacturers)), divided by the sum of the average monthly number of
customers during such period. CPU for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $17.81
and $19.15, respectively. CPU for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $18.11 and
$19.65, respectively. We continue to achieve cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our
business, which contributed to the decrease in CPU for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2007. However, these benefits have been partially offset by construction and operating expenses
associated with our Expansion Markets, which contributed approximately $3.36 and $3.12 of
additional CPU for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
Core Markets Performance Measures
Set forth below is a summary of certain key performance measures for the periods indicated for
our Core Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Core Markets Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
2,578,019 |
|
|
|
2,174,264 |
|
|
|
2,578,019 |
|
|
|
2,174,264 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
35,729 |
|
|
|
55,096 |
|
|
|
277,061 |
|
|
|
302,599 |
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
170,983 |
|
|
$ |
128,283 |
|
|
$ |
489,175 |
|
|
$ |
364,585 |
|
Core Markets Adjusted
EBITDA as a Percent of
Service Revenues |
|
|
47.7 |
% |
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
46.5 |
% |
|
|
43.9 |
% |
42
We launched our service initially in 2002 in the greater Miami, Atlanta, Sacramento and San
Francisco metropolitan areas. Our Core Markets have a licensed population of approximately 26
million, of which our networks currently cover approximately 23 million.
Customers. Net customer additions in our Core Markets were 35,729 for the three months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to 55,096 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Net customer
additions in our Core Markets were 277,061 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared
to 302,599 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Total customers were 2,578,019 as of
September 30, 2007, an increase of 19% over the customer total as of September 30, 2006 and 12%
over the customer total as of December 31, 2006. The increase in total customers is primarily
attributable to the continued demand for our service offerings.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it is the
primary performance metric for which our reportable segments are evaluated and it is utilized by
management to facilitate evaluation of our ability to meet future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements and to fund future growth. For the three months ended
September 30, 2007, Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $171.0 million compared to $128.3 million for
the same period in 2006. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA
was $489.2 million compared to $364.6 million for the same period in 2006. We continue to
experience increases in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a result of continued customer growth and
cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core Markets.
Adjusted EBITDA as a Percent of Service Revenues. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service
revenues is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total service revenues. Core Markets Adjusted
EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were
47.7% and 45.0%, respectively. Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were 46.5% and 43.9%, respectively. Consistent
with the increase in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA, we continue to experience corresponding
increases in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues due to the growth in
service revenues as well as cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core
Markets.
Expansion Markets Performance Measures
Set forth below is a summary of certain key performance measures for the periods indicated for
our Expansion Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Expansion Markets Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
1,086,199 |
|
|
|
442,268 |
|
|
|
1,086,199 |
|
|
|
442,268 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
78,573 |
|
|
|
142,527 |
|
|
|
446,171 |
|
|
|
389,312 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) |
|
$ |
13,516 |
|
|
$ |
(20,112 |
) |
|
$ |
25,088 |
|
|
$ |
(79,393 |
) |
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a
Percent of Service Revenues |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
NM |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
NM |
|
Customers. Net customer additions in our Expansion Markets were 78,573 for the three months
ended September 30, 2007, compared to 142,527 for the three
months ended September 30, 2006. The decrease in net customer
additions is the result of the fact that our markets historically
have experienced greater net additions in the first twelve months
following the launch of services. Net
customer additions in our Expansion Markets were 446,171 for the nine months ended September 30,
2007, compared to 389,312 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Total customers were
1,086,199 as of September 30, 2007, an increase of 146% over the customer total as of September 30,
2006 and a 70% over the customer total as of December 31, 2006. The increase in total customers is
primarily attributable to the continued demand for our service offerings and the launch of our
services in the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota metropolitan area to include the Orlando
metropolitan area in November 2006.
Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit). Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it
is the primary performance metric for which our reportable segments are evaluated and it is
utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of our ability to meet future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements and to fund future growth. For the three months ended
September 30, 2007, Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA
43
was $13.5 million compared to an Adjusted EBITDA deficit of $20.1 million for the same period
in 2006. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $25.1
million compared to an Adjusted EBITDA deficit of $79.4 million for the same period in 2006. The
increase in Adjusted EBITDA, when compared to the same periods in the previous year, was
attributable to the growth in service revenues in the Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit and
Tampa/Sarasota/Orlando metropolitan areas as well as the achievement of cost benefits due to the
increasing scale of our business in the Expansion Markets.
Adjusted EBITDA as a Percent of Service Revenues. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service
revenues is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total service revenues. Expansion Markets
Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was
10.3%. Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was 7.0%. Consistent with the increase in Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA, we
continue to experience corresponding increases in Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of
service revenues due to the growth in service revenues as well as cost benefits due to the
increasing scale of our business in the Expansion Markets.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We utilize certain financial measures and key performance indicators that are not calculated
in accordance with GAAP to assess our financial and operating performance. A non-GAAP financial
measure is defined as a numerical measure of a companys financial performance that (i) excludes
amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding amounts, that are included
in the comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in the statement of
income or statement of cash flows; or (ii) includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have
the effect of including amounts, that are excluded from the comparable measure so calculated and
presented.
ARPU, CPGA, CPU, are non-GAAP financial measures utilized by our management to judge our
ability to meet our liquidity requirements and to evaluate our operating performance. We believe
these measures are important in understanding the performance of our operations from period to
period, and although every company in the wireless industry does not define each of these measures
in precisely the same way, we believe that these measures (which are common in the wireless
industry) facilitate key liquidity and operating performance comparisons with other companies in
the wireless industry. The following tables reconcile our non-GAAP financial measures with our
financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP.
ARPU We utilize ARPU to evaluate our per-customer service revenue realization and to assist
in forecasting our future service revenues. ARPU is calculated exclusive of activation revenues, as
these amounts are a component of our costs of acquiring new customers and are included in our
calculation of CPGA. ARPU is also calculated exclusive of E-911, FUSF and vendors compensation
charges, as these are generally pass through charges that we collect from our customers and remit
to the appropriate government agencies.
Average number of customers for any measurement period is determined by dividing (a) the sum
of the average monthly number of customers for the measurement period by (b) the number of months
in such period. Average monthly number of customers for any month represents the sum of the number
of customers on the first day of the month and the last day of the month divided by two. The
following table shows the calculation of ARPU for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average number |
|
|
|
of customers and ARPU) |
|
Calculation of Average Revenue Per User (ARPU): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
489,131 |
|
|
$ |
332,920 |
|
|
$ |
1,407,988 |
|
|
$ |
916,179 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activation revenues |
|
|
(2,995 |
) |
|
|
(2,123 |
) |
|
|
(8,137 |
) |
|
|
(6,026 |
) |
E-911, FUSF and vendors compensation charges |
|
|
(25,215 |
) |
|
|
(9,512 |
) |
|
|
(71,206 |
) |
|
|
(29,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net service revenues |
|
$ |
460,921 |
|
|
$ |
321,285 |
|
|
$ |
1,328,645 |
|
|
$ |
880,931 |
|
Divided by: Average number of customers |
|
|
3,592,045 |
|
|
|
2,503,423 |
|
|
|
3,416,036 |
|
|
|
2,281,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARPU |
|
$ |
42.77 |
|
|
$ |
42.78 |
|
|
$ |
43.22 |
|
|
$ |
42.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
CPGA We utilize CPGA to assess the efficiency of our distribution strategy, validate the
initial capital invested in our customers and determine the number of months to recover our
customer acquisition costs. This measure also allows us to compare our average acquisition costs
per new customer to those of other wireless broadband PCS providers. Activation revenues and
equipment revenues related to new customers are deducted from selling expenses in this calculation
as they represent amounts paid by customers at the time their service is activated that reduce our
acquisition cost of those customers. Additionally, equipment costs associated with existing
customers, net of related revenues, are excluded as this measure is intended to reflect only the
acquisition costs related to new customers. The following table reconciles total costs used in the
calculation of CPGA to selling expenses, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure to CPGA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except gross customer |
|
|
|
additions and CPGA) |
|
Calculation of Cost Per Gross Addition (CPGA): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses |
|
$ |
35,625 |
|
|
$ |
26,062 |
|
|
$ |
99,096 |
|
|
$ |
72,796 |
|
Less: Activation revenues |
|
|
(2,995 |
) |
|
|
(2,123 |
) |
|
|
(8,137 |
) |
|
|
(6,026 |
) |
Less: Equipment revenues |
|
|
(67,607 |
) |
|
|
(63,196 |
) |
|
|
(236,612 |
) |
|
|
(177,592 |
) |
Add: Equipment revenue not associated with new
customers |
|
|
31,590 |
|
|
|
28,802 |
|
|
|
107,492 |
|
|
|
80,571 |
|
Add: Cost of equipment |
|
|
131,179 |
|
|
|
117,982 |
|
|
|
437,925 |
|
|
|
330,898 |
|
Less: Equipment costs not associated with new customers |
|
|
(43,254 |
) |
|
|
(38,259 |
) |
|
|
(142,218 |
) |
|
|
(108,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross addition expenses |
|
$ |
84,538 |
|
|
$ |
69,268 |
|
|
$ |
257,546 |
|
|
$ |
192,355 |
|
Divided by: Gross customer additions |
|
|
671,379 |
|
|
|
575,820 |
|
|
|
2,164,511 |
|
|
|
1,650,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPGA |
|
$ |
125.92 |
|
|
$ |
120.29 |
|
|
$ |
118.99 |
|
|
$ |
116.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU CPU is cost of service and general and administrative costs (excluding applicable
non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of service and general and
administrative expense) plus net loss on equipment transactions unrelated to initial customer
acquisition (which includes the gain or loss on sale of handsets to existing customers and costs
associated with handset replacements and repairs (other than warranty costs which are the
responsibility of the handset manufacturers)) exclusive of E-911, FUSF and vendors compensation
charges, divided by the sum of the average monthly number of customers during such period. CPU does
not include any depreciation and amortization expense. Management uses CPU as a tool to evaluate
the non-selling cash expenses associated with ongoing business operations on a per customer basis,
to track changes in these non-selling cash costs over time, and to help evaluate how changes in our
business operations affect non-selling cash costs per customer. In addition, CPU provides
management with a useful measure to compare our non-selling cash costs per customer with those of
other wireless providers. We believe investors use CPU primarily as a tool to track changes in our
non-selling cash costs over time and to compare our non-selling cash costs to those of other
wireless providers. Other wireless carriers may calculate this measure differently. The following
table reconciles total costs used in the calculation of CPU to cost of service, which we consider
to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to CPU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average number |
|
|
|
of customers and CPU) |
|
Calculation of Cost Per User (CPU): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service |
|
$ |
163,671 |
|
|
$ |
113,524 |
|
|
$ |
471,233 |
|
|
$ |
313,510 |
|
Add: General and administrative expense |
|
|
48,871 |
|
|
|
34,158 |
|
|
|
141,054 |
|
|
|
99,125 |
|
Add: Net loss on equipment
transactions unrelated to initial
customer acquisition |
|
|
11,664 |
|
|
|
9,457 |
|
|
|
34,726 |
|
|
|
27,721 |
|
Less: Stock-based compensation expense
included in cost of service and
general and administrative expense |
|
|
(7,107 |
) |
|
|
(3,781 |
) |
|
|
(18,971 |
) |
|
|
(7,750 |
) |
Less: E-911, FUSF and vendors
compensation revenues |
|
|
(25,215 |
) |
|
|
(9,512 |
) |
|
|
(71,206 |
) |
|
|
(29,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs used in the calculation of CPU |
|
$ |
191,884 |
|
|
$ |
143,846 |
|
|
$ |
556,836 |
|
|
$ |
403,384 |
|
Divided by: Average number of customers |
|
|
3,592,045 |
|
|
|
2,503,423 |
|
|
|
3,416,036 |
|
|
|
2,281,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU |
|
$ |
17.81 |
|
|
$ |
19.15 |
|
|
$ |
18.11 |
|
|
$ |
19.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments and cash generated from operations. At September 30, 2007, we had a total of
approximately $1.7 billion in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.
We can and have historically invested our substantial cash balances in, among other things,
securities issued and fully guaranteed by the United States or any state, highly rated commercial
paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand
deposits. These investments are subject to credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. For
example, we have made investments of approximately $134.0 million in certain AAA rated
auction rate securities that are collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying
collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. As a result of the lack of
liquidity in this market, these securities have failed to attract a buyer at scheduled auctions for
these securities. As a result, we recognized an other-than-temporary impairment loss on investment
securities in the amount of $15.0 million during the period ended September 30, 2007. Such loss
increased $17.1 million during the one month ended
October 31, 2007 based on statements received from our
broker. Management believes that any future additional impairment charges will not have a material
effect on our liquidity.
Our strategy has been to offer our services in major metropolitan areas and their surrounding
areas, which we refer to as clusters. We are seeking opportunities to enhance our current market
clusters and to provide service in new geographic areas. From time to time, we may purchase
spectrum and related assets from third parties or the FCC. We participated as a bidder in FCC
Auction 66 and in November 2006 we were granted eight licenses for a total aggregate purchase price
of approximately $1.4 billion.
As a result of the acquisition of the spectrum licenses from Auction 66 and the opportunities
that these licenses provide for us to expand our operations into major metropolitan markets, we
will require significant additional capital in the future to finance the construction and initial
operating costs associated with such licenses, including clearing costs associated with
non-governmental incumbent licenses which we currently estimate to be between approximately $40
million and $60 million. We generally do not intend to commence the construction of any individual
license area until we have sufficient funds available to provide for the related construction and
operating costs associated with such license area. We currently plan to focus on building out
approximately 40 million of the total population in our Auction 66 Markets with a primary focus on
the New York, Philadelphia, Boston and Las Vegas metropolitan areas. Of the approximate 40 million
total population, we are targeting launch of operations with an initial covered population of
approximately 30 to 32 million by late 2008 or early 2009. Our initial launch dates will vary in
our Auction 66 Markets and our launch dates in the larger metropolitan areas may be accomplished in
phases. Our Auction 66 Markets will entail a more extensive use of DAS systems than we have
deployed in the past. This, along with other factors, could result in an increase in the total
capital expenditures per covered population to initially launch operations, however, we would not
expect the estimate of total cash expenditures to reach free cash flow positive to be materially
impacted. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and our
anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fully fund this planned expansion.
The construction of our network and the marketing and distribution of our wireless
communications products and services have required, and will continue to require, substantial
capital investment. Capital outlays have included license acquisition costs, capital expenditures
for construction of our network infrastructure, costs associated with clearing and relocating
non-governmental incumbent licenses, funding of operating cash flow losses incurred as we launch
services in new metropolitan areas and other working capital costs, debt service and financing fees
and expenses. Our capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2007 were approximately $525.7
million and aggregate capital expenditures for 2006 were approximately $550.7 million. These
expenditures were primarily associated with the construction of the network infrastructure in our
Expansion Markets and our efforts to increase the service area and capacity of our existing Core
Markets network through the addition of cell sites and switches. We believe the increased service
area and capacity in existing markets will improve our service offering, helping us to attract
additional customers and increase revenues. In addition, we believe our new Expansion Markets have
attractive demographics which will result in increased revenues.
As of September 30, 2007, we owed an aggregate of approximately $3.0 billion under our senior
secured credit facility and 91/4% senior notes. On February 20, 2007, MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. entered
into an amendment to the senior secured credit facility. Under the amendment, the margin on the base rate used to
determine the senior secured credit facility interest rate was reduced to 2.25% from 2.50%. On June
6, 2007, MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. completed the sale of the additional notes at a price equal to
105.875% of the principal amount of such additional notes with approximately
$421.0 million in net proceeds.
46
Our senior secured credit facility calculates consolidated Adjusted EBITDA as: consolidated
net income plus depreciation and amortization; gain (loss) on disposal of assets; non-cash
expenses; gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt; provision for income taxes; interest expense; and
certain expenses of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. minus interest and other income and non-cash
items increasing consolidated net income.
We consider Adjusted EBITDA, as defined above, to be an important indicator to investors
because it provides information related to our ability to provide cash flows to meet future debt
service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements and fund future growth. We present
this discussion of Adjusted EBITDA because covenants in our senior secured credit facility contain
ratios based on this measure. If our Adjusted EBITDA were to decline below certain levels,
covenants in our senior secured credit facility that are based on Adjusted EBITDA, including our
maximum senior secured leverage ratio covenant, may be violated and could cause, among other
things, an inability to incur further indebtedness and in certain circumstances a default or
mandatory prepayment under our senior secured credit facility. Our maximum senior secured leverage
ratio is required to be less than 4.5 to 1.0 based on Adjusted EBITDA plus the impact of certain
new markets. The lenders under our senior secured credit facility use the senior secured leverage
ratio to measure our ability to meet our obligations on our senior secured debt by comparing the
total amount of such debt to our Adjusted EBITDA, which our lenders use to estimate our cash flow
from operations. The senior secured leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of senior secured
indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by our senior secured credit facility. For the twelve
months ended September 30, 2007, our senior secured leverage ratio was 2.25 to 1.0, which means for
every $1.00 of Adjusted EBITDA we had $2.25 of senior secured indebtedness. In addition,
consolidated Adjusted EBITDA is also utilized, among other measures, to determine managements
compensation levels. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, and
should not be considered a substitute for, operating income, net income, or any other measure of
financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA should not be
construed as an alternative to, or more meaningful than cash flows from operating activities, as
determined in accordance with GAAP.
The following table shows the calculation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in
our senior secured credit facility, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Calculation of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
29,266 |
|
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
|
$ |
70,625 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
45,493 |
|
|
|
36,611 |
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
|
|
96,187 |
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
(1,615 |
) |
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense (1) |
|
|
7,107 |
|
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
18,971 |
|
|
|
7,750 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
54,574 |
|
|
|
24,811 |
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
|
|
67,408 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary (1) |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
|
|
(4,386 |
) |
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
|
|
(15,106 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
33,512 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
|
47,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
184,499 |
|
|
$ |
108,171 |
|
|
$ |
514,263 |
|
|
$ |
285,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a non-cash expense, as defined by our senior secured credit facility. |
47
In addition, for further information, the following table reconciles consolidated Adjusted
EBITDA, as defined in our senior secured credit facility, to cash flows from operating activities
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
173,141 |
|
|
$ |
85,620 |
|
|
$ |
440,450 |
|
|
$ |
284,688 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
54,574 |
|
|
|
24,811 |
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
|
|
67,408 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
(2,926 |
) |
|
|
(2,657 |
) |
|
|
(3,702 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
|
|
(4,386 |
) |
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
|
|
(15,106 |
) |
Recovery of (provision for) uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
(2,316 |
) |
|
|
(1,989 |
) |
|
|
(6,582 |
) |
|
|
(5,365 |
) |
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
(1,431 |
) |
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
|
|
(2,069 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(899 |
) |
|
|
(469 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
6,282 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
8,523 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
33,512 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
|
47,245 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(33,100 |
) |
|
|
(15,296 |
) |
|
|
(95,257 |
) |
|
|
(41,792 |
) |
Changes in working capital |
|
|
(22,291 |
) |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
(28,979 |
) |
|
|
(47,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
184,499 |
|
|
$ |
108,171 |
|
|
$ |
514,263 |
|
|
$ |
285,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $440.5 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to $284.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The
increase was primarily attributable to a 109% increase in net income and a 128% increase in
deferred income taxes during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2006.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $392.5 million during the nine months ended September
30, 2007 compared to $489.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The decrease
was due primarily to a $200.0 million decrease in deposits to FCC for licenses, partially offset by
a $83.8 million increase in purchases of property and equipment which was primarily related to the
construction of the Expansion Markets as well as a $20.1 million increase in investment activity.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $1.3 billion during the nine months ended September
30, 2007 compared to $208.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This increase
was due primarily to $818.3 million in net proceeds from the companys initial public offering that
was completed in April 2007 and $421.0 million in net proceeds from the Additional Notes that were
issued in June 2007. These increases were partially offset by a $200.0 million decrease in net
proceeds from the bridge credit agreements.
Capital Expenditures and Other Asset Acquisitions and Dispositions
Capital Expenditures. We and Royal Street expect to incur approximately $600 million in
capital expenditures for the year ending December 31, 2007 in our Core and Expansion Markets. In
addition we expect to incur approximately $225 million in capital expenditures for the year ending
December 31, 2007 in our Auction 66 Markets.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we and Royal Street incurred $525.7 million
in capital expenditures. These capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion and
improvement of our existing network infrastructure and costs associated with the construction of
the Boston, Las Vegas, New York and Philadelphia Expansion Markets.
48
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we had incurred $550.7 million in capital
expenditures. These capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion and improvement of our
existing network infrastructure and costs associated with the construction of the Dallas/Ft. Worth,
Detroit and Orlando Expansion Markets that we launched in 2006, as well as the Los Angeles
Expansion Market.
Other Acquisitions and Dispositions. We had no significant acquisitions or dispositions during
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
We believe that inflation has not materially affected our operations.
Effect of New Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS No. 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands
disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We will be required to adopt
SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. We have not completed our evaluation of the
effect of SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, (SFAS No. 159),
which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities
with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets
and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No.
159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We will be required to adopt
SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008. We have not completed our evaluation of the effect of SFAS No.
159.
Michigan Business Tax
On July 12, 2007, the Michigan Governor signed into law a new Michigan Business Tax (MBT
Act) which restructures the state business tax by replacing the Michigan Single Business Tax with
a new two-part tax on business income and modified gross receipts, collectively referred to as the
(BIT/GRT tax). On September 30, 2007, the Michigan Governor signed into law a BIT/GRT tax future
deduction which is intended to offset the increased deferred tax liability and expense associated
with the MBT Act. Because the main provision of the BIT/GRT tax imposes a two-part tax on business
income and modified gross receipts, we believe the BIT/GRT tax and related future deduction should
be accounted for under the provisions of SFAS No. 109 regarding the recognition of deferred taxes.
In accordance with SFAS No. 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in
tax law should be included in tax expense attributable to continuing operations in the period that
includes the enactment date. Although the effective date of the MBT Act is January 1, 2008, certain
effects of the change should be reflected in the financial statements of the first interim or
annual reporting period that includes July 12 and September 30, 2007. We recorded a deferred tax
liability and offsetting asset of $3.1 million as of September 30, 2007 relating to the MBT Act and
future deduction.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates,
including interest rates. We do not routinely enter into derivatives or other financial instruments
for trading, speculative or hedging purposes, unless it is required by our credit agreements. We do
not currently conduct business internationally, so we are generally not subject to foreign currency
exchange rate risk.
49
As of September 30, 2007, we had approximately $1.6 billion in outstanding indebtedness under
our senior secured credit facility that bears interest at floating rates based on the London Inter
Bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 2.25%. The interest rate on the outstanding debt under our senior
secured credit facility as of September 30, 2007 was 7.370%. On November 21, 2006, to manage our
interest rate risk exposure and fulfill a requirement of our senior secured credit facility, we
entered into a three-year interest rate protection agreement. This agreement covers a notional
amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this portion of our variable rate debt to fixed
rate debt at an annual rate of 7.169%. The quarterly interest settlement periods began on February
1, 2007. The interest rate swap agreement expires in 2010. If market LIBOR rates increase 100 basis
points over the rates in effect at September 30, 2007, annual interest expense on the approximately
$584.0 million in variable rate debt would increase approximately $5.8 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act,
reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as required by the SEC and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our CEO and CFO, as
appropriate, to allow for appropriate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our
management, with participation by our CEO and CFO, has designed the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of achieving these desired objectives. As required
by SEC Rule 13a-15(e), we conducted an evaluation, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
September 30, 2007, the end of the period covered by this report. In designing and evaluating the
disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, and management is necessarily required to apply judgment in evaluating
the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and objectives. Based upon that evaluation, our
CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of
September 30, 2007, in timely making known to them material information relating to us and our
consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the
Exchange Act.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended September 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
50
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 14, 2006, Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc., or
collectively Leap, filed suit against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-06CV-240-TJW and amended on June 16, 2006,
for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless Communication Services
and Network and System for Delivering of Same, or the 497 Patent, issued to Leap. The complaint
seeks both injunctive relief and monetary damages for our alleged infringement of the 497 patent.
On August 3, 2006, we (i) answered the complaint, (ii) raised a number of affirmative defenses, and
(iii) together with two related entities, counterclaimed against Leap and several related entities
and certain current and former employees of Leap, including Leaps CEO. In our counterclaims, we
claim that we do not infringe any valid or enforceable claim of the 497 Patent and we asserted
claims for breach of contractual obligations, constructive trust, misappropriation, conversion and
disclosure of trade secrets, misappropriation of confidential information, and breach of a
confidential relationship. Our counterclaims seek monetary and exemplary damages, and injunctive
relief. Certain of the Leap defendants, including its CEO, answered our counterclaims on
October 13, 2006. In its answer, Leap and its CEO denied our allegations and asserted affirmative
defenses to our counterclaims. In connection with denying a motion to dismiss by certain individual
defendants, the court concluded that our claims against those defendants were compulsory
counterclaims. On April 3, 2007, the Court held a Scheduling Conference at which the Court set the
date for the claim construction hearing for December 2007 and the trial date for August 2008. On
October 24, 2007, the parties filed a stipulation to request that the Court administratively close
the suit and stay all discovery for a period not to exceed six months and the parties further
agreed to not seek to reopen the case until 90 days after the Court administratively closed the
suit. On October 31, 2007, the Court entered an order administratively closing the suit and
removing from its calendar the dates for the claim construction hearing and trial. If the Court
reinstates the suit at the request of either party, we believe the Court will most likely set a new
claims construction hearing date and trial date. We plan to vigorously defend against Leaps
claims relating to the 497 Patent.
If Leap were successful in its claim for injunctive relief, we could be enjoined from
operating our business in the manner we currently operate, which could require us to expend
additional capital to change certain of our technologies and operating practices, or could prevent
us from offering some or all of our services using some or all of our existing systems. In
addition, if Leap were successful in its claim for monetary damages, we could be forced to pay Leap
substantial damages for past infringement and/or ongoing royalties on a portion of our revenues,
which could materially adversely impact our financial performance.
We have also tendered Leaps claims to the manufacturer of our network infrastructure
equipment, Alcatel Lucent, for indemnity and defense. Alcatel Lucent has declined to indemnify and
defend us. We have filed a petition in state district court in Harrison County, Texas for a
declaratory ruling that Alcatel Lucent is obligated to cooperate, indemnify, defend and hold us
harmless from the Leap patent infringement action and for specific performance, for injunctive
relief and for breach of contract. On September 14, 2007, Alcatel Lucent responded to our petition
and requested that the Court dismiss, abate, stay, and deny every claim in our petition asserted
against Alcatel Lucent and order us to amend our petition. On October 12, 2007, we responded to
Alcatel Lucents request and a hearing has been scheduled for December 6, 2007 on Alcatel Lucents
request. We plan to vigorously prosecute our petition.
On August 15, 2006, we filed a separate action in the California Superior Court, Stanislaus
County, Case No. 382780, against Leap and others for unfair competition, misappropriation of trade
secrets, interference with contracts, breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective
business advantage, and trespass. In this suit we seek monetary and punitive damages and injunctive
relief. Defendants responded to our complaint by filing demurrers on or about January 5, 2007
requesting that the Court dismiss the complaint. On February 1, 2007, the Court granted the
demurrers in part and granted us leave to amend the complaint. We filed a First Amended Complaint
on February 27, 2007. Defendants responded by filing demurrers on March 28, 2007, requesting that
the Court dismiss our First Amended Complaint. On May 1, 2007, the Court issued a tentative ruling
granting its own motion to strike the First Amended Complaint and granted us leave to amend the
First Amended Complaint and held
51
that Defendants demurrers and motions to strike were moot. We filed a Second Amended
Complaint on May 14, 2007. Defendants responded by filing a joint demurrer and motion to strike on
June 15, 2007, requesting that the Court strike various claims and dismiss other claims in our
Second Amended Compliant. On July 19, 2007, the Court issued its ruling dismissing the trespass
claims, granting leave to the Company to amend the breach of contract claims, and denying the
remainder of the defendants demurrer and motion to strike. On August 16, 2007, we filed our Third
Amended Complaint. On September 20, 2007, Defendants demurrered to the Third Amended Complaint
alleging that the claims were uncertain. On October 16, 2007, we responded to Defendants demurrer
and the hearing on Leaps demurrer was scheduled for October 31, 2007. On October 24, 2007, the
parties filed a stipulation to request that the Court stay the suit and discovery for 90 days
following the entry of the Order granting the stay. On October 25, 2007, the Court entered an
order staying the suit and discovery until January 23, 2008. If the Court reinstates the suit at the request of
either party, we believe the Court will most likely set new dates for the suit and discovery. The
Court has set the next status conference for this action for
January 28, 2008. We
intend to vigorously prosecute this complaint.
On September 22, 2006, Royal Street filed a separate action in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, and Civil Action
No. 8:06-CV-01754-T-23TBM, seeking a declaratory judgment that Leaps 497 Patent is invalid and
not being infringed upon by Royal Street. Leap responded to Royal Streets complaint by filing a
motion to dismiss Royal Streets complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the
alternative, that the action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas, Marshall Division where Leap has brought suit against us under the same patent.
Royal Street has responded to this motion. On July 2, 2007, the Court entered an Order transferring
the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall
Division. On July 10, 2007, Royal Street filed a motion to reconsider the transfer or to amend the
order to correct a misstatement of fact.
In addition, we are involved in litigation from time to time, including litigation regarding
intellectual property claims, that we consider to be in the normal course of business. We are not
currently party to any other pending legal proceedings that we believe would, individually or in
the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There has been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Item 1A. Risk
Factors of our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2007 other than the changes and additions
to the Risk Factors set forth below.
Risks Related to Our Business
We face intense competition from other wireless and wireline communications providers, and
potential new entrants, which could adversely affect our operating results and hinder our ability
to grow.
We compete directly in each of our markets with (i) other facilities-based wireless providers,
such as Verizon Wireless, Cingular Wireless, Sprint Nextel, and T-Mobile and their prepaid
affiliates or brands, (ii) non-facilities based mobile virtual network operators, or MVNOs, such as
Virgin Mobile USA and Ampd Mobile, (iii) incumbent local exchange carriers, such as AT&T and
Verizon, as a mobile alternative to traditional landline service and (iv) competitive local
exchange carriers or Voice-Over-Internet-Protocol, or VoIP, service providers, such as Vonage, Time
Warner, Comcast, McLeod USA, Clearwire and XO Communications, as a mobile alternative to wired
service. We also may face competition from providers of an emerging technology known as Worldwide
Interoperability for Microwave Access, or WiMax, which is capable of supporting wireless
transmissions suitable for mobility applications. Also, certain mobile satellite providers recently
have received authority to offer ancillary terrestrial service on their satellite spectrum and a
coalition of companies which includes DIRECTV Group, EchoStar, Google, Inc., Intel Corp. and Yahoo!
has indicated its desire to establish next generation wireless networks and technologies in the
700 MHz band. In addition, VoIP service providers have indicated that they may offer wireless
services over a Wi-Fi/Cellular network to compete directly with us for the provisioning of wireless
services. Many major cable television service providers, including Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Cox
52
Communications and Bright House Networks, also have indicated their intention to offer suites
of service, including wireless service, often referred to as the Quadruple Play, and are actively
pursuing the acquisition of spectrum or leasing access to spectrum to implement those plans. These
cable companies formed a joint venture along with Sprint Nextel, who has subsequently terminated
its interest in the joint venture, called SpectrumCo LLC, or SpectrumCo, which bid on and acquired
20 MHz of advanced wireless service, or AWS, spectrum in a number of major metropolitan areas
throughout the United States, including all of the major metropolitan areas which comprise our Core
and Expansion Markets. Many of our current and
prospective competitors are, or are affiliated with, major companies that have substantially
greater financial, technical, personnel and marketing resources than we have (including spectrum
holdings, brands and intellectual property) and larger market share than we have, which may affect
our ability to compete successfully. These competitors often have greater name and brand
recognition, access to greater amounts of capital, in some cases more spectrum and established
relationships with a larger base of current and potential customers and, accordingly, we may not be
able to compete successfully. In some metropolitan areas, we also compete with local or regional
carriers, such as Leap and Sure West Wireless, some of whom have or may develop fixed-rate
unlimited service plans similar to ours. In some instances, our competitors are or are becoming or
may become privately owned, which may provide them with certain advantages and increased
flexibility.
Sprint Nextel has begun offering an unlimited local calling plan under its Boost brand in
certain of the geographic areas in which we offer service or plan to offer service, including
San Francisco, Sacramento, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Tampa/Sarasota/Orlando, Miami
and Las Vegas. These offerings could have a material adverse effect on our future financial
results. In response, we have added additional select features to our existing service plans in
these metropolitan areas, and we may consider additional targeted promotional activities as we
evaluate the competitive environment going forward. As a result of these initiatives, we may
experience lower revenues, lower ARPU, lower adjusted EBITDA and increased churn in the affected
metropolitan areas. Sprint Nextel may expand these offerings into other metropolitan areas,
including metropolitan areas in which we currently operate or plan to operate. If Sprint Nextel
expands its unlimited local calling plans into other metropolitan areas, or if other carriers
institute similar service plans in our other metropolitan areas, we may consider similar changes to
our service plans in additional metropolitan areas, which could have a material adverse effect on
our financial results.
We expect that increased competition will result in more competitive pricing, slower growth
and increased churn of our customer base. Our ability to compete will depend, in part, on our
ability to anticipate and respond to various competitive factors and to keep our costs low. The
competitive pressures of the wireless telecommunications industry have caused, and may continue to
cause, other carriers to offer service plans with increasingly large bundles of minutes of use at
increasingly lower prices and service plans with unlimited nights and weekends. These competitive
plans could adversely affect our ability to maintain our pricing and market penetration and
maintain and grow our customer base.
We may face increased competition from other fixed rate unlimited plan competitors in our existing
and new markets.
We currently overlap with Leap and Sure West Wireless, who are fixed-rate unlimited service
plan wireless carriers providing service in the Sacramento, Modesto and Merced, California basic
trading areas. In Auction 66, the FCC auctioned 90 MHz of spectrum in each geographic area of the
United States including the areas in which we currently hold or have access to licenses. Leap also
acquired licenses in Auction 66 in some of the same geographic areas in which we currently hold or
have access to licenses or in which we were granted licenses as a result of Auction 66. The FCC
also intends to auction 62 MHz of spectrum on the 700 MHz band no later than January 2008. On
October 5, 2007, the FCC released the Public Notice for the auction setting the application filing
deadline for December 3, 2007 and the scheduled auction commencement date for January 24, 2008. In
addition to Leap, other licensees who have PCS spectrum, acquired spectrum in Auction 66, or may
acquire spectrum in the 700 MHz band, also may decide to offer fixed-rate unlimited wireless
service offerings. In addition, Sprint Nextel has launched an
53
unlimited local calling plan under its Boost brand in certain of the metropolitan areas in
which we offer or plan to offer service. Other national wireless carriers may also decide in the
future to offer fixed-rate unlimited wireless service offerings. In addition, we may not be able to
launch fixed-rate unlimited service plans ahead of our competition in our new markets. As a result,
we may experience lower growth in such areas, may experience higher churn, may change our service
plans in affected markets and may incur higher costs to acquire customers, which may materially and
adversely affect our financial performance in the future.
If we submit an application to participate in the 700 MHz auction, we will be subject to the FCCs
anti-collusion rule.
If we submit an application to participate in the 700 MHz auction, applicable FCC rules will
place certain restrictions on business communications with other applicants. For example, the FCC
has indicated that discussions with other carriers regarding roaming agreements, the partitioning
of markets or the disaggregation of spectrum, or the acquisition of licenses or licensees, may
implicate the anti-collusion rule if both parties to the discussions are competing applicants in
the auction and, in the course of the discussions, the parties exchange information pertaining to
or affecting their bids, bidding strategy or the post-auction market structure. These
anti-collusion restrictions may affect the normal conduct of our business by inhibiting discussions
and the conclusion of beneficial transactions with other carriers from the time applications are
due until after the conclusion of the auction, which time period could last 3 to 6 months, or more.
No handsets are currently available for the AWS or 700 MHz spectrum and no network equipment is
currently available for the 700 MHz spectrum and such handsets or network equipment may not be
developed in a timely manner.
The AWS and 700 MHz spectrum requires modified or new handsets and the 700 MHz spectrum
requires new or modified network equipment, both of which are not currently available. We do not
manufacture or develop our own network equipment or handsets and are dependent on third party
manufacturers to design, develop and manufacture such equipment. If handsets or network equipment
are not available when we need them, we may not be able to develop the Auction 66 Markets or any
licenses we may acquire in the 700 MHz auction. We may, therefore, be forced to pay interest on our
indebtedness which we used to fund the purchase of the licenses in Auction 66 and any licenses we
may be declared as the high bidder in the 700 MHz auction without realizing any revenues from our
Auction 66 Markets or 700 MHz licenses.
The investment of our substantial cash balances are subject to risks which may cause losses.
We can and have historically invested our substantial cash balances in, among other things,
securities issued and fully guaranteed by the United States or any state, highly rated commercial
paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand
deposits. These investments are subject to credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. For
example, we have made investments of approximately $134 million in certain AAA rated
auction rate securities that are collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying
collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities, or CDO securities. As a
result of the lack of liquidity in the market for CDO securities, these CDO securities failed to
attract a buyer at scheduled auctions for these CDO securities. As a
result, we have recognized a loss of approximately $15.0 million on this investment
for the period ended September 30, 2007 and we anticipate that
we may recognize additional losses. Such
risks, including the continued failure of future auctions for the auction rate securities, may
result in a loss of liquidity, substantial impairment to our investments, realization of
substantial future losses, or a complete loss of the investment in the long-term which may have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
If we lose the right to install our equipment on wireless cell sites, or are unable to renew
expiring leases for wireless cell sites on favorable terms or at all, our business and operating
results could be adversely impacted.
Our base stations are installed on leased cell site facilities or in connection with DAS
systems. A significant portion of these cell sites are leased from a small number of large cell
site and DAS system providers under master agreements governing the general terms of our use of
that companys cell sites or DAS systems. If a master agreement with one of these cell site or DAS
system providers were to terminate, the cell site or DAS system providers were to experience severe
financial difficulties or file for bankruptcy, or if one of these cell site or DAS
54
system providers were unable to support our use of its cell sites or DAS systems, we would
have to find new sites or rebuild the affected portion of our network. In addition, the
concentration of our cell site leases and DAS systems with a limited number of cell site and DAS
system providers could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition if we are
unable to renew our expiring leases or DAS system agreements with these companies either on terms
comparable to those we have today or at all.
In addition, the tower industry has continued to consolidate. If any of the companies from
which we lease towers or DAS systems were to consolidate with other tower or DAS systems companies,
they may have the ability to raise prices which could materially affect our profitability. If any
of the cell site leasing companies or DAS system providers with which we do business were to
experience severe financial difficulties, or file for bankruptcy protection, our ability to use
cell sites or DAS systems leased from that company could be adversely affected. If a material
number of cell sites or DAS systems were no longer available for our use, our financial condition
and operating results could be adversely affected.
We may be unable to obtain the roaming and other services we need from other carriers to remain
competitive.
Many of our competitors have regional or national networks which enable them to offer
automatic roaming and long distance telephone services to their subscribers at a lower cost than we
can offer. We do not have a national network, and we must pay fees to other carriers who provide
roaming services and who carry long distance calls made by our subscribers. We currently have
roaming agreements with several other carriers which allow our customers to roam on those carriers
network. The roaming agreements, however, do not cover all geographic areas where our customers may
seek service when they travel, generally cover voice but not data services, and at least one such
agreement may be terminated on relatively short notice. In addition, we believe the rates charged
by certain of the carriers to us in some instances are higher than the rates they charge to certain
other roaming partners.
The FCC recently adopted a Report and Order clarifying that it is a common carrier obligation
of commercial mobile radio service providers to provide automatic roaming services on just,
reasonable and non-discriminatory terms. The obligation extends to real-time, two way switched
voice and data services that are interconnected with the public switched network and utilize an
in-network switching facility that enables the provider to reuse frequencies and accomplish
seamless hand-offs of subscriber calls. Our current services generally meet this definition which
means that we should be entitled to enter into reasonable automatic arrangements with other
technically compatible carriers. The FCC Order also finds it unreasonable to request roaming
services for any geographic area in which a requesting carrier holds licenses to or leases spectrum
but has not yet built its system. This in-market roaming restriction may adversely affect our
ability to receive roaming services in areas where we hold licenses. We are seeking reconsideration
of these in-market roaming restrictions, but cannot predict whether our petition will succeed or
the time frame in which our petition will be considered. Oppositions to the petitions for
reconsideration were due on November 6, 2007, and replies to such
oppositions are due on November 16,
2007. Also, the FCC declined to adopt any default rate or rate regulation scheme for roaming
services, so our ability to obtain automatic roaming agreements at attractive rates remains
uncertain. If we are unable to enter or maintain roaming agreements at reasonable rates, including
in areas where we have licenses or lease spectrum but have not constructed facilities, we may be
unable to effectively compete and may lose customers and revenues. We may also be unable to
continue to receive roaming services in areas we hold licenses or lease spectrum after the
expiration or termination of our existing roaming agreements. The FCC ruling also may obligate us
to allow customers of other technically compatible carriers to roam automatically on our systems,
which may enhance their ability to compete with us.
The FCC did not extend the automatic roaming to services that are classified as information
services (such as high speed wireless Internet access services) or to
services that are not classified as CMRS
(such as non-interconnected services). The FCC is seeking comment in a Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking on whether the roaming rights and obligations should be extended to these services. We and certain other carriers have supported extending
the roaming rights and obligations to these services and these
carriers have opposed this extension. We cannot predict the likely
outcome of this further proceeding or the likely timing of any FCC action. If the FCC does not
adopt an automatic roaming requirement for these services, we could have difficulty attracting and retaining certain groups or types of customers,
which could have a material adverse impact on our business.
55
We may incur higher than anticipated intercarrier compensation costs, which could increase our
costs and reduce our profit margin.
When our customers use our service to call customers of other carriers, we generally are
required to pay the carrier that serves the called party and any intermediary or transit carrier
for the use of their network. Similarly, when a customer of another carrier calls one of our
customers, that carrier generally is required to pay us for the use of our network. While we
generally have been successful in negotiating agreements with other carriers that establish
acceptable compensation arrangements, some carriers have claimed a right to unilaterally impose
charges on us that we consider to be unreasonably high. The FCC has determined that certain
unilateral termination charges imposed prior to April 2005 may be appropriate. We have requested
clarification of this order. We cannot assure you that the FCC will rule in our favor. An adverse
ruling or FCC inaction could result in some carriers successfully collecting such fees from us,
which could increase our costs and affect our financial performance. In the meantime, certain
carriers are threatening to pursue or have initiated claims against us for termination payments and
the likely outcome of these claims is uncertain. A finding by the FCC that we are liable for
additional terminating compensation payments could subject us to additional claims by other
carriers. In response to requests from certain telecommunication carriers, the FCC has recently
issued a Declaratory Ruling that carriers are prohibited from blocking traffic to carriers with
whom they do not have an interconnection agreement. We therefore may not be able to block traffic
to telecommunication carriers who may be terminating substantial amounts of traffic from our
network. In addition, certain transit carriers have taken the position that they can charge
market rates for transit services, which may in some instances be significantly higher than our
current rates. We may be obligated to pay these higher rates and/or purchase services from others
or engage in direct connection, which may result in higher costs which could materially affect our
costs and financial results.
Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters
We are dependent on our FCC licenses, and our ability to provide service to our customers and
generate revenues could be harmed by adverse regulatory action or changes to existing laws or
rules.
The FCC regulates most aspects of our business, including the licensing, construction,
modification, operation, use, ownership, control, sale, roaming arrangements and interconnection
arrangements of wireless communications systems, as do some state and local regulatory agencies. We
can make no assurances that the FCC or the state and local agencies having jurisdiction over our
business will not adopt regulations or take other actions that would adversely affect our business
by imposing new costs or requiring changes in our current or planned operations, or that the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, or the Communications Act, from which the FCC obtains its
authority, will not be amended in a manner materially adverse to us.
Taken together or individually, new or changed regulatory requirements affecting any or all of
the wireless, local, and long distance industries may harm our business and restrict the manner in
which we operate our business. The enactment of new adverse legislation, regulation or regulatory
requirements may slow our growth and have a material adverse effect upon our business, results of
operations and financial condition. We cannot assure you that changes in current or future
regulations adopted by the FCC or state regulators, or other legislative, administrative or
judicial initiatives relating to the communications industry, will not have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, pending
congressional legislative efforts to reform the Communications Act or address certain issues
relating to the telecommunication industry generally or the wireless industry may cause major
industry and regulatory changes that are difficult to predict and which may have material adverse
consequences to us. Further, additional or changed regulatory or legislative requirements could
require us to change the way we do business, require us to make additional investments and incur
additional expenses, all of which could materially adversely affect our business and financial
results.
Some of our principal assets are our FCC licenses which we use to provide our services. The
loss of any of these licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition. Our FCC licenses are subject to revocation if the FCC finds we
are not in compliance with its rules or the Communications Acts requirements. We also could be
subject to fines and forfeitures for such non-compliance, which could adversely affect our
business. For example, absent a waiver, failure to comply with the FCCs Enhanced-911, or E-911,
requirements, privacy rules, lighting and painting regulations, construction requirements,
employment regulations, Customer Proprietary Network Information, or CPNI, protection rules,
hearing aid-compatibility rules, number portability requirements, law enforcement cooperation,
anti-collusion rules, emergency preparedness and disaster recovery requirements, truth in billing,
or other existing or new regulatory mandates could subject us to significant penalties or a
revocation of our FCC licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition. A party to the 700 MHz proceeding has suggested that many
carriers, including us, may have violated the anti-collusion rules during the recent Auction 66. We
disagree with this suggestion as it relates to us. In addition, a failure to comply with these
requirements or the FCCs construction requirements could result in revocation or termination of
the licenses and/or fines and forfeitures, any of which could have an adverse effect on our
business. Finally, a material failure to comply with FCC or statutory requirements may limit our
ability to draw certain amounts under our senior secured credit facility or could result in a
default under our credit facilities.
56
The value of our licenses may drop in the future as a result of volatility in the marketplace and
the sale of additional spectrum by the FCC.
The market value of FCC licenses has been subject to significant volatility in the past and
Congress has mandated that the FCC bring an additional substantial amount of spectrum to the market
by auction in the next several years. The likely impact of these future auctions on license values
is uncertain. For example, Congress has mandated that the FCC auction 60 MHz of spectrum in the
700 MHz band in early 2008 and another 40 MHz of AWS spectrum is in the process of being assigned
for wireless broadband services and is expected to be auctioned in the future by the FCC. On
October 5, 2007, the FCC released the Public Notice for the auction of 62 MHz in the 700 MHz band
setting the application filing deadline for December 3, 2007 and the scheduled auction commencement
date for January 24, 2008. There can be no assurance of the market value of our FCC licenses or
that the market value of our FCC licenses will not be volatile in the future. If the value of our
licenses were to decline significantly, we could be forced to record non-cash impairment charges
which could impact our ability to borrow additional funds. A significant impairment loss could have
a material adverse effect on our operating income and on the carrying value of our licenses on our
balance sheet.
The requirements of the FCC Order Implementing the Independent Panel on Hurricane Katrina may have
a material financial or operational impact on our financial results and operations.
In June 2007, the FCC released an Order implementing various recommendations of the
Independent Panel Reviewing the Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Communications Networks which
requires us to have an emergency back-up power source for all assets that are normally powered from
local alternating current commercial power including mobile switching offices and cell sites. The Order could be interpreted to require
wireless carriers to maintain emergency back-up power to provide for at least eight hours of power
for all equipment at cell sites and twenty-four hours for all equipment located at a carriers
mobile switching office. This Order was due to take effect on October 9, 2007. The difficulties we
face in seeking to comply with this Order appear to be shared by other wireless carriers and, as a
result, CTIA, a trade association for wireless carriers, filed a motion for administrative stay of
the Order requesting that the FCC relax the new requirements, and on September 28, 2007, CTIA filed
an Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal with the District of Columbia Circuit which requested a
stay of the Order. On August 10, 2007, we and others filed petitions for clarification and
reconsideration seeking clarification that the Order does not apply to DAS systems and seeking
reconsideration of the rules in favor of a more flexible back-up power requirement. On October 3,
2007, the FCC released its Order on Reconsideration, or Reconsideration Order, addressing the
petitions for reconsideration of the Order. The Reconsideration Order requires the Company to have
an emergency backup power source for all assets necessary to maintain communications that are
normally powered from local commercial power, including those assets located inside mobile
switching offices and cell sites, and we must maintain emergency backup power for a minimum of
twenty-four hours for assets that are normally powered from local commercial power and located
inside mobile switching offices, and eight hours for assets that are normally powered from local
commercial power and at other locations, including cell sites and DAS nodes. We will not be
required to comply with these minimum backup power requirements where we can demonstrate that such
compliance is precluded by: (i) federal, state, tribal or local law; (ii) risk to safety of life or
health; or (iii) private legal obligation or agreement. In addition, within 6 months of the
effective date of the Order, which is the date of federal register publication announcing OMB
approval of the information collection requirements, we will be required to file a report with the
FCC providing certain information with respect to compliance with the backup power requirements. In
cases where we identify assets that were designed with less than the required emergency backup
power capacity and that is not precluded from compliance, we must comply with the backup power
requirement or, within 12 months from the effective date of the rule, file with the FCC a certified
emergency backup power compliance plan. That plan must certify that and describe how we will
provide emergency backup power to 100 percent of the area covered by any non-compliant asset in the
event of a commercial power failure. The CTIA appeal of the original Order was dismissed on October
10, 2007. We may find it necessary to file a waiver request seeking relief from the requirements of
the Reconsideration Order. We can give no assurance that the FCC will grant the requested relief.
If we are required to comply with the Reconsideration Order we may be required to purchase
additional equipment, spend additional capital, seek and receive additional state and local
permits, authorizations and approvals, and incur additional operating expenses to comply with this
Order and such costs could be material. In addition, we may be unable to comply with the
Reconsideration Order and we could be subject to fines and forfeitures and other adverse licensing
actions from the FCC. Further, the requirement to install these back up power facilities could also
adversely affect our operations by distracting management and engineering resources from the
maintenance and growth of our existing networks, which could have a material adverse impact on our
operations. Finally, a material failure to comply with such requirements may limit our ability to
draw certain amounts under our existing senior secured credit facility or could result in a default
under our credit facility.
57
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
58
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ Roger D. Linquist
|
|
|
|
Roger D. Linquist |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ J. Braxton Carter
|
|
|
|
J. Braxton Carter |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
59
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
60