e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission File Number 1-6903
Trinity Industries,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
75-0225040
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
2525 Stemmons Freeway,
|
|
75207-2401
|
Dallas, Texas
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(214) 631-4420
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act
|
|
|
|
|
Name of each exchange
|
Title of each class
|
|
on which registered
|
|
Common Stock ($1.00 par value)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
|
Rights To Purchase Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock,
$1.00 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
|
Securities registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to
file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d)
of the
Act. Yes o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting
company o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell
company. Yes
o
No þ
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price
at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business
day of the Registrants most recently completed second
fiscal quarter (June 30, 2007) was
$3,436.0 million.
At January 31, 2008 the number of shares of common stock
outstanding was 81,396,967.
The information required by Part III of this report, to
the extent not set forth herein, is incorporated by reference
from the Registrants definitive 2008 Proxy Statement.
TRINITY
INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
i
PART I
General Development of Business. Trinity
Industries, Inc., (Trinity, Company,
we, or our) headquartered in Dallas,
Texas, is a multi-industry company that owns a variety of
market-leading businesses which provide products and services to
the industrial, energy, transportation, and construction
sectors. Trinity was incorporated in 1933.
Trinity became a Delaware Corporation in 1987. Our principal
executive offices are located at 2525 Stemmons Freeway, Dallas,
Texas
75207-2401,
our telephone number is
214-631-4420,
and our Internet website address is www.trin.net.
Financial Information About Industry
Segments. Financial information about our
industry segments for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006, and 2005 is presented in Part II, Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Narrative Description of Business. We
manufacture and sell railcars and railcar parts, inland barges,
concrete and aggregates, highway products, beams and girders
used in highway construction, tank containers, a variety of
steel parts, and structural wind towers. In addition, we lease
railcars to our customers through a captive leasing business,
Trinity Industries Leasing Company.
We serve our customers through five business groups:
Rail Group. Through wholly owned
subsidiaries, our Rail Group is the leading freight railcar
manufacturer in North America (Trinity Rail Group).
We provide a full complement of railcars used for transporting a
wide variety of liquids, gases, and dry cargo.
Trinity Rail Group provides a complete array of railcar
solutions for our customers. We manufacture a full line of
railcars, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Auto Carrier Cars Auto carrier cars
transport automobiles and a variety of other vehicles.
|
|
|
|
Box Cars Box cars transport products such as
food products, auto parts, wood products, and paper.
|
|
|
|
Gondola Cars Rotary gondola cars are
primarily used for coal service. Top-loading gondola cars
transport a variety of other heavy bulk commodities such as
scrap metals and steel products.
|
|
|
|
Hopper Cars Covered hopper cars carry cargo
such as grain, distillers dried grain, dry fertilizer, plastic
pellets, and cement. Open-top hoppers are most often used to
haul coal.
|
|
|
|
Intermodal Cars Intermodal cars transport
intermodal containers and trailers, which are generally
interchangeable among railcar, truck, and ship.
|
|
|
|
Specialty Cars Specialty cars are designed
to address the special needs of a particular industry or
customer, such as waste-hauling gondolas, side dump cars, and
pressure differential cars used to haul fine grain food products
such as starch and flour.
|
|
|
|
Tank Cars Tank cars transport products such
as liquefied petroleum products, alcohol and renewable fuels,
liquid fertilizer, and food and grain products such as vegetable
oil and corn syrup.
|
We produce the widest range of railcars in the industry allowing
us to capitalize on changing industry trends and developing
market opportunities. We also provide a variety of railcar
components for the North American market from our plants in the
United States and Mexico. We manufacture and sell railcar parts
used in manufacturing and repairing railcars, such as auto
carrier doors and accessories, discharge gates, yokes, couplers,
axles, and hitches. We also have two repair and coating
facilities located in Texas.
Our customers include railroads, leasing companies, and shippers
of products, such as utilities, petrochemical companies, grain
shippers, and major construction and industrial companies. We
compete against five major railcar manufacturers in the North
American market.
1
For the year ended December 31, 2007, we shipped
approximately 27,370 railcars, or approximately 42% of total
North American railcar shipments. Our railcar order backlog as
of December 31, 2007 was approximately 31,870 railcars.
Approximately 44% of our railcar total backlog was dedicated to
sales to external customers, which includes approximately 17% of
our total backlog dedicated to TRIP Rail Leasing LLC
(TRIP). The remaining approximately 56% of our
railcar backlog was dedicated to our Rail Leasing and Management
Services Group of which 100% have operating lease agreements for
these railcars with external customers. The final amount
dedicated to the Rail Leasing and Management Services Group may
vary by the time of delivery. Our railcar order backlog
represents approximately 42% of the total North American railcar
backlog.
We hold patents of varying duration for use in our manufacture
of railcar and component products. We believe patents offer a
marketing advantage in certain circumstances. No material
revenues are received from licensing of these patents.
Railcar Leasing and Management Services
Group. Through wholly owned subsidiaries,
primarily Trinity Industries Leasing Company (TILC),
we lease tank cars and freight cars. Our Railcar Leasing and
Management Services Group (Leasing Group) is a
provider of leasing and management services and is an important
strategic resource that uniquely links our Rail Group with our
customers. Trinity Rail Group and TILC coordinate sales and
marketing activities under the registered trade name
TrinityRail®,
thereby providing a single point of contact for railroads and
shippers seeking solutions to their rail equipment and service
needs. The Leasing Group provides us with revenue, earnings, and
cash flow diversification.
Our railcars are leased to railroads, shippers, and various
other companies that supply their own railcars to the railroads.
These companies span the petroleum, chemical, agricultural, and
energy industries, among others. Substantially all of our owned
railcars are purchased from and manufactured by our Rail Group
at prices comparable to the prices for railcars sold by our Rail
Group to third parties. The terms of our railcar leases
generally vary from one to twenty years and provide for fixed
monthly rentals, with an additional mileage charge when usage
exceeds a specified maximum. A small percentage of our fleet is
leased on a per diem basis. As of December 31, 2007, our
lease fleet included approximately 36,090 owned or leased
railcars that were 99.2% utilized. Of this total, approximately
25,840 railcars were owned by TILC and approximately 10,250
railcars were leased in a sale leaseback transaction.
In addition, we manage railcar fleets on behalf of unaffiliated
third parties. We believe our railcar fleet management services
complement our leasing business by generating stable fee income,
strengthening customer relationships, and enhancing the view of
Trinity as a leading provider of railcar products and services.
Our railcar leasing business is very competitive and there are a
number of well-established entities that actively compete with
us in the business of leasing railcars.
Construction Products Group. Through
wholly owned subsidiaries, our Construction Products Group
produces concrete, aggregates, and asphalt and manufactures
highway products as well as beams and girders used in highway
bridge construction. Many of these lines of business are
seasonal and revenues are impacted by weather conditions.
We are a leader in the supply of ready mix concrete in certain
areas of Texas. We also have plant locations in Arkansas and
Louisiana. Our customers for concrete include contractors and
subcontractors in the construction and foundation industry who
are located near our plant locations. We also distribute
construction aggregates, such as crushed stone, sand and gravel,
asphalt rock, and recycled concrete in several larger Texas
cities. Our aggregates customers are mostly other concrete
producers, paving contractors, and other consumers of
aggregates. We compete with ready mix concrete producers and
aggregate producers located in the regions where we operate.
In 2007, we entered into the asphalt business in certain areas
of Texas. We produce and sell asphalt material to state agencies
and contractors for road surface and repair. Our customers are
located in close proximity to our asphalt plants.
In highway products, we are the only full line producer of
guardrails, crash cushions, and other protective barriers that
dissipate the force of impact in collisions between vehicles and
fixed roadside objects. We believe we are the largest highway
guardrail manufacturer in the United States, based on revenues,
with a comprehensive
2
nationwide guardrail supply network. The Federal Highway
Administration determines which products are eligible for
federal funds for highway projects and has approved most of our
products as acceptable permanent and construction zone highway
hardware according to requirements of the National Cooperative
Highway Research Program.
Our crash cushions and other protective barriers include
multiple proprietary products manufactured through various
product license agreements with certain public and private
research organizations and inventors. We hold patents and are a
licensee for certain of our guardrail and end-treatment products
that enhance our competitive position for these products.
We sell highway products in Canada, Mexico, and all 50 of the
United States. We also export our proprietary highway products
to certain other countries. We compete against several national
and regional guardrail manufacturers.
We manufacture structural steel beams and girders for the
construction of new, restored, or replacement railroad bridges,
county, municipal, and state highway bridges, and power
generation plants. We sell bridge construction and support
products primarily to owners, general contractors, and
subcontractors on highway and railroad construction projects. In
2008, we plan to exit this business. We also manufacture the
bodies of off-road mining dump trucks.
Inland Barge Group. Through wholly
owned subsidiaries, we are the leading manufacturer of inland
barges in the United States and the largest manufacturer of
fiberglass barge covers. We manufacture a variety of dry cargo
barges, such as deck barges, and open or covered hopper barges
that transport various commodities, such as grain, coal, and
aggregates. We also manufacture tank barges used to transport
liquid products. Our fiberglass reinforced lift covers are used
primarily for grain barges while our rolling covers are used for
other bulk commodities. Our four barge manufacturing facilities
are located along the United States inland river systems
allowing for rapid delivery to our customers. Our barge order
backlog as of December 31, 2007 was approximately
$752.8 million.
Our primary Inland Barge customers are commercial marine
transportation companies. Many companies have the capability to
enter into, and from time to time do enter into, the inland
barge manufacturing business. We strive to compete through
operational efficiency and quality products.
Energy Equipment Group. Through wholly
owned subsidiaries, our Energy Equipment Group manufactures tank
containers and tank heads for pressure vessels, propane tanks,
and structural wind towers.
We are a leading manufacturer of tank containers and tank heads
for pressure vessels. We manufacture tanks in the United States
and Mexico. We market a portion of our products in Mexico under
the brand name of
TATSA®.
We manufacture propane tanks that are used by industrial plants,
utilities, residences, and small businesses in suburban and
rural areas. We also manufacture fertilizer containers for bulk
storage, farm storage, and the application and distribution of
anhydrous ammonia. Our propane tank products range from 9-gallon
tanks for motor fuel use to 1,800,000-gallon bulk storage
spheres. We sell our propane tanks to propane dealers and large
industrial users. In the United States we generally deliver the
containers to our customers who install and fill the containers.
Our competitors include large and small manufacturers of tanks.
We manufacture tank heads, which are pressed metal components
used in the manufacturing of many of our finished products. We
manufacture the tank heads in various shapes, and we produce
pressure rated or non-pressure rated tank heads, depending on
their intended use. We use a significant portion of the tank
heads we manufacture in the production of our tank cars and
containers. We also sell our tank heads to a broad range of
other manufacturers. There is strong competition in the tank
heads business.
We are a leading manufacturer of structural wind towers in North
America. We manufacture structural wind towers for use in the
wind energy market. These towers are manufactured in the United
States and Mexico to customer specifications and installed by
our customers. Our customers are generally turbine producers.
Our structural wind tower order backlog as of December 31,
2007 was approximately $702.4 million.
There are a number of well-established entities that actively
compete with us in the business of manufacturing energy
equipment.
3
All Other. All Other includes our
captive insurance and transportation companies; legal,
environmental, and upkeep costs associated with non-operating
facilities; other peripheral businesses; and the change in
market valuation related to ineffective commodity hedges.
Foreign Operations. Trinitys foreign
operations are primarily located in Mexico. Continuing
operations included sales to foreign customers, primarily in
Mexico, which represented 1.9%, 2.5%, and 2.2% of our
consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. As of December 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005, we had approximately 6.0%, 5.1%, and 5.7%
of our long-lived assets not held for sale located outside the
United States.
We manufacture railcars, propane tank containers, tank heads,
structural wind towers, and other parts at our Mexico facilities
for export to the United States and other countries. Any
material change in the quotas, regulations, or duties on imports
imposed by the United States government and its agencies or on
exports imposed by the government of Mexico or its agencies
could adversely affect our operations in Mexico. Our foreign
activities are also subject to various other risks of doing
business in foreign countries, including currency fluctuations,
political changes, changes in laws and regulations, and economic
instability. Although our operations have not been materially
affected by any of these factors to date, any substantial
disruption of business as it is currently conducted could
adversely affect our operations at least in the short term.
Backlog. As of December 31, 2007, our
backlog for new railcars was approximately $2.7 billion,
approximately $752.8 million for Inland Barge products, and
approximately $702.4 million for structural wind towers.
Included in the railcar backlog was approximately
$1,426.7 million of railcars to be sold to our Leasing
Group of which 100% have lease agreements for these railcars
with external customers. A majority of our backlog is expected
to be delivered in the 12 months ending December 31,
2008. In 2006, the Inland Barge Group entered into a multi-year
sales agreement for dry cargo barges with deliveries beginning
in 2007. Deliveries for 2008 are included in the backlog at this
time; deliveries beyond 2008 are not included in the backlog as
specific production quantities for future years have not been
determined.
As of December 31, 2006, our backlog for new railcars was
approximately $2.9 billion, $463.6 million for Inland
Barge products, and $248.5 million for structural wind
towers. Included in the railcar backlog was
$1,501.3 million of railcars to be sold to our Leasing
Group.
Marketing. We sell substantially all of our
products and services through our own sales personnel operating
from offices in the following states and foreign countries:
Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee,
Texas, Utah, Washington, Canada, Mexico, and Sweden. We also use
independent sales representatives to a limited extent.
Raw Materials and Suppliers.
Railcar Specialty Components and
Steel. Products manufactured at our railcar
manufacturing facilities require a significant supply of raw
materials such as steel, as well as numerous specialty
components such as brakes, wheels, axles, side frames, bolsters,
and bearings. Specialty components and steel purchased from
third parties comprise approximately 50% of the production cost
of each railcar. Although the number of alternative suppliers of
specialty components has declined in recent years, at least two
suppliers continue to produce most components. However, any
unanticipated interruption in the supply chain of specialty
components would have an impact on both our margins and
production schedules.
The principal material used in our Rail, Inland Barge, and
Energy Equipment Groups is steel. During 2007, the prices of
steel we purchased increased at a much lower rate than in prior
years and general price increases announced by the steel
producers were mitigated through contract purchases. Steel
prices have been and may be volatile as a result of scrap
surcharges assessed by steel production facilities. Supply was
sufficient to support our manufacturing requirements. The prices
for component parts purchased in 2007 increased over base prices
paid in 2006. We used escalation clauses and other arrangements
with our customers to reduce the impact of these cost increases,
thus minimizing the effect on our operating margins for the year.
4
In general, we believe there is enough capacity in the supply
industry to meet current production levels. We believe the
existing contracts and other relationships we have in place will
meet our current production forecasts. However, any
unanticipated interruption in our supply chain could have an
adverse impact on both our margins and production schedules.
Aggregates. Aggregates can be found
throughout the United States, and many producers exist
nationwide. However, as a general rule, shipments from an
individual quarry are limited in geographic scope because the
cost of transporting processed aggregates to customers is high
in relation to the value of the product itself. We operate 15
mining facilities strategically located in Texas and Louisiana
to fulfill some of our needs for aggregates.
Cement. Cement required for the
Concrete & Aggregates business is received primarily
from Texas and overseas. In 2007, the supply of cement was
sufficient in our markets to meet demand. We have not
experienced difficulties supplying concrete to our customers.
Employees. The following table presents the
approximate breakdown of employees by business group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Business Group
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Rail Group
|
|
|
7,470
|
|
Construction Products Group
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
Inland Barge Group
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
Energy Equipment Group
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
|
|
|
110
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
410
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, approximately 9,460 employees
were employed in the United States and approximately
4,940 employees were employed in Mexico.
Acquisitions and Divestitures. See Note 2
Acquisitions and Divestitures.
Environmental Matters. We are subject to
comprehensive federal, state, local, and foreign environmental
laws and regulations relating to the release or discharge of
materials into the environment; the management, use, processing,
handling, storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous and
non-hazardous waste and materials; and other activities relating
to the protection of human health and the environment. Such laws
and regulations not only expose us to liability for our own
acts, but also may expose us to liability for the acts of others
or for our actions which were in compliance with all applicable
laws at the time these actions were taken. In addition, such
laws may require significant expenditures to achieve compliance,
and are frequently modified or revised to impose new
obligations. Civil and criminal fines and penalties may be
imposed for non-compliance with these environmental laws and
regulations. Our operations that involve hazardous materials
also raise potential risks of liability under common law.
Environmental operating permits are, or may be, required for our
operations under these laws and regulations. These operating
permits are subject to modification, renewal, and revocation. We
regularly monitor and review our operations, procedures, and
policies for compliance with these laws and regulations. Despite
these compliance efforts, risk of environmental liability is
inherent in the operation of our businesses, as it is with other
companies engaged in similar businesses. We believe that our
operations and facilities owned, managed, or leased, are in
substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations and
that any non-compliance is not likely to have a material adverse
effect on our operations or financial condition.
However, future events such as changes in or modified
interpretations of existing laws and regulations or enforcement
policies, or further investigation or evaluation of the
potential health hazards associated with our products, business
activities, or properties, may give rise to additional
compliance and other costs that could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and operations.
5
In addition to environmental laws, the transportation of
commodities by railcar or barge raises potential risks in the
event of a derailment, spill, or other accident. Generally,
liability under existing law in the United States for a
derailment, spill, or other accident depends on the negligence
of the party, such as the railroad, the shipper, or the
manufacturer of the barge, railcar, or its components. However,
under certain circumstances strict liability concepts may apply.
Governmental
Regulation.
Railcar Industry. The primary
regulatory and industry authorities involved in the regulation
of the railcar industry are the Environmental Protection Agency;
the Research and Special Programs Administration, a division of
the United States Department of Transportation; the Federal
Railroad Administration, a division of the United States
Department of Transportation; and the Association of American
Railroads.
These organizations establish rules and regulations for the
railcar industry, including construction specifications and
standards for the design and manufacture of railcars and railcar
parts; mechanical, maintenance, and related standards for
railcars; safety of railroad equipment, tracks, and operations;
and packaging and transportation of hazardous materials.
We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance
with these regulations. We cannot predict whether any future
changes in these rules and regulations could cause added
compliance costs that could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition or operations.
Inland Barge Industry. The primary
regulatory and industry authorities involved in the regulation
of the inland barge industry are the United States Coast Guard;
the United States National Transportation Safety Board; the
United States Customs Service; the Maritime Administration of
the United States Department of Transportation; and private
industry organizations such as the American Bureau of Shipping.
These organizations establish safety criteria, investigate
vessel accidents, and recommend safety standards. Violations of
these laws and related regulations can result in substantial
civil and criminal penalties as well as injunctions curtailing
operations.
We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance
with applicable laws and regulations. We cannot predict whether
future changes that affect compliance costs would have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and
operations.
Highway Products. The primary
regulatory and industry authorities involved in the regulation
of our highway products business are the United States
Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway
Administration, and various state highway departments.
These organizations establish certain standards and
specifications related to the manufacture of our highway
products. If our products were found not to be in compliance
with these standards and specifications we would be required to
re-qualify our products for installation on state and national
highways.
We believe that our highway products are in substantial
compliance with all applicable standards and specifications. We
cannot predict whether future changes in these standards and
specifications, would have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and operations.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration and similar
regulations. Our operations are subject to
regulation of health and safety matters by the United States
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. We believe that
we employ appropriate precautions to protect our employees and
others from workplace injuries and harmful exposure to materials
handled and managed at our facilities. However, claims may be
asserted against us for work-related illnesses or injury, and
our operations may be adversely affected by the further adoption
of occupational health and safety regulations in the United
States or in foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. While we
do not anticipate having to make material expenditures in order
to remain in substantial compliance with health and safety laws
and regulations, we are unable to predict the ultimate cost of
compliance. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will
not become involved in future litigation or other proceedings or
if we were found to be responsible or liable in any litigation
or proceeding, that such costs would not be material to us.
6
Other Matters. To date, we have not
suffered any material shortages with respect to obtaining
sufficient energy supplies to operate our various plant
facilities or transportation vehicles. Future limitations on the
availability or consumption of petroleum products, particularly
natural gas for plant operations and diesel fuel for vehicles,
could have an adverse effect upon our ability to conduct our
business. The likelihood of such an occurrence or its duration,
and its ultimate effect on our operations, cannot be reasonably
predicted at this time.
Executive Officers of the Company. The
following table sets forth the names and ages of all of our
executive officers, their positions and offices presently held
by them, the year each person first became an executive officer
and the term of each persons office:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
Term
|
Name(1)
|
|
Age
|
|
Office
|
|
Since
|
|
Expires
|
|
Timothy R. Wallace
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
May 2008
|
William A. McWhirter II
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
May 2008
|
D. Stephen Menzies
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Group President
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
May 2008
|
Mark W. Stiles
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Group President
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
May 2008
|
Madhuri A. Andrews
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Vice President, Information Technology
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
May 2008
|
Donald G. Collum
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Audit Executive
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
May 2008
|
Andrea F. Cowan
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources and Shared Services
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
May 2008
|
Virginia C. Gray, Ph.D.
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President, Organizational Development
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
May 2008
|
Paul M. Jolas
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Deputy General Counsel-Corporate and Transactions and Corporate
Secretary
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
May 2008
|
Adrian E. Lee
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Vice President of Strategic Sourcing
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
May 2008
|
John M. Lee
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Vice President, Business Development
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
May 2008
|
Charles Michel
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
May 2008
|
James E. Perry
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
May 2008
|
S. Theis Rice
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Legal Officer
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
May 2008
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ms. Andrews joined us in 2008 as Vice President,
Information Technology and brings over 10 years of
experience driving technological improvements at global
companies in a variety of industries. Since January 2002, she
led the information technology organization for a major
semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Prior to that,
she led the information technology organization for the Americas
division of a global semiconductor company for five years.
Mr. Collum joined us in 2004 and was appointed Vice
President, Chief Audit Executive in May 2005. Prior to that, he
served as President and Chief Executive Officer of a
manufacturing company and previously was an Audit Partner with
Arthur Young & Co. (now Ernst & Young).
Mr. Perry joined us in 2004 and was appointed Treasurer in
April 2005. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President of
Finance for a teleservices company. Dr. Gray joined us in
2007 and was appointed Vice President, Organizational
Development. Prior to that, she was President of a consulting
firm focused on improving organizational effectiveness.
Dr. Gray has more than 13 years of experience in the
field of Industrial/Organizational Psychology. Mr. Jolas
joined us in 2006 as Deputy General Counsel
Corporate and Transactions and was appointed Corporate Secretary
in May 2007. Prior to that, he was Senior Regional
Counsel Texas Division for KB Home, a Fortune 500
public company engaged in the homebuilding business, from 2004
to 2006 and General Counsel, Executive Vice President and
Corporate Secretary of Radiologix, Inc., a public company
engaged in diagnostic imaging services, from 1996 to 2003.
Mr. Jolas has more than 18 years of legal experience
in law firm and in-house legal positions. Mr. Adrian Lee
joined us in 2006 and was appointed to Vice President of
Strategic Sourcing in 2007. Prior to that, he was the Group
Purchasing Manager for the Water |
7
|
|
|
|
|
Transmission Group of Ameron International since 1997. All of
the other above-mentioned executive officers have been in full
time employment of Trinity or its subsidiaries for more than
five years. Although the titles of certain such officers have
changed during the past five years, all have performed
essentially the same duties during such period of time with the
exception of Mr. McWhirter, Mr. Menzies, and
Mr. Rice. Mr. McWhirter joined the Company in 1985 and
held various accounting positions until 1992, when he became a
business group officer. In 1999, he was elected to a corporate
position as Vice President for Mergers and Acquisitions. In
2001, he was named Executive Vice President of a business group.
In March 2005, he became Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. Mr. Menzies joined us in 2001 as President of
Trinity Industries Leasing Company. In 2006, he became Senior
Vice President and Group President for
TrinityRail®.
Mr. Rice served as President of our European operations
before being elected to his present position in March 2002. |
There are risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual
results to be materially different from those indicated by
forward-looking statements that we make from time to time in
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), news releases, reports, proxy statements,
registration statements, and other written communications, as
well as oral forward-looking statements made from time to time
by representatives of our Company. These risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, the risks described below.
Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or
that we currently deem immaterial but that which may become
material in the future also may impair our business operations.
The cautionary statements below discuss important factors that
could cause our business, financial condition, operating
results, and cash flows to be materially adversely affected.
Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on the forward-looking statements contained herein. We undertake
no obligations to update or revise publicly any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events, or otherwise.
The cyclical nature of our business results in lower revenues
during economic downturns. We operate in cyclical
industries. Downturns in overall economic conditions usually
have a significant adverse effect on cyclical industries due to
decreased demand for new and replacement products. Decreased
demand could result in lower sales volumes, lower prices,
and/or a
loss of profits. The railcar, barge, and wind energy industries
have previously experienced deep down cycles and operated with a
minimal backlog. If a down cycle were to return in one or more
of these cyclical businesses, we could experience losses and
close plants, suspend production, and incur related costs.
Litigation claims could increase our costs and weaken our
financial condition. We and our subsidiaries are
currently, and may from time to time be, involved in various
legal proceedings arising out of our operations. Adverse
outcomes in some or all of these claims could result in
significant monetary damages against us that could increase our
costs and weaken our financial condition. While we maintain
reserves for reasonably estimable liability and liability
insurance at coverage levels based upon commercial norms in our
industries, our reserves may be inadequate to cover the
uninsured portion of claims or lawsuits or any future claims or
lawsuits arising from our businesses for which we are judged
liable, and any such claims or lawsuits could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operations or overall financial
condition.
Increases in the price and demand for steel and other
component parts could lower our margins and
profitability. The principal material used in our
Rail, Inland Barge, and Energy Equipment Groups is steel. During
2007, the prices of steel we purchased increased at a much lower
rate than in prior years and general price increases announced
by the steel producers were partially mitigated through contract
purchases. Steel prices have been and may be volatile as a
result of scrap surcharges assessed by steel production
facilities. Supply was sufficient to support our manufacturing
requirements. The prices for component parts purchased in 2007
increased over base prices paid in 2006. We used escalation
clauses and other arrangements with our customers to reduce the
impact of these cost increases, thus minimizing the effect on
our operating margins for the year.
In general, we believe there is enough capacity in the supply
industry to meet current production levels. We believe our
existing contracts and other relationships we have developed
will meet our current production forecasts. However, any
unanticipated interruption in our supply chain could have an
adverse impact on both our margins and production schedules.
8
We have potential exposure to environmental liabilities,
which may increase costs and lower
profitability. Our operations are subject to
extensive federal, state, and local environmental laws and
regulations, including those dealing with air quality and the
handling and disposal of waste products, fuel products, and
hazardous substances. In particular, we may incur investigation,
remediation, and related expenses related to property conditions
that we inherited after acquiring older manufacturing facilities
that were constructed and operated before the adoption of
current environmental laws. Further, some of the products we
manufacture are used to transport hazardous materials.
Although we conduct due diligence inquiries and analysis with
respect to environmental matters in connection with
acquisitions, we may be unable to identify or be indemnified for
all potential environmental liabilities relating to any acquired
business. Environmental liabilities incurred by us, if not
covered by adequate insurance or indemnification, will increase
our respective costs and have a negative impact on our
profitability.
We operate in highly competitive industries, which may impact
our financial results. We face aggressive
competition in all geographic markets and each industry sector
in which we operate. As a result, competition on pricing is
often intense. The effect of this competition could reduce our
revenues, limit our ability to grow, increase pricing pressure
on our products, and otherwise affect our financial results.
If our railcar leasing subsidiary is unable to obtain
acceptable long-term financing of its railcar lease fleet, our
lenders may foreclose on the portion of our lease fleet that
secures our warehouse facility. TILC, our wholly
owned captive leasing subsidiary, uses borrowings under a
warehouse facility to initially finance the railcars it
purchases from our rail manufacturing business. Borrowings under
the warehouse facility are secured by the specific railcars
financed by such borrowings and the underlying leases. The
warehouse facility is non-recourse to us and to our subsidiaries
other than Trinity Rail Leasing Trust II (TRL
II) a qualified subsidiary of TILC that is the borrower
under the warehouse facility. Borrowings under the warehouse
facility are available through August 2009, and unless renewed
would be payable in three equal installments in February 2010,
August 2010, and February 2011. A decline in the value of the
railcars securing borrowings under the warehouse facility or in
the creditworthiness of the lessees under the associated leases
could reduce TRL IIs ability to obtain long-term financing
for such railcars. Additionally, fluctuations in interest rates
from the time TRL II purchases railcars with short-term
borrowings under the warehouse facility and the time TRL II
obtains permanent financing for such railcars could decrease our
profitability on the leasing of the railcars and could have an
adverse impact on our financial results. If TRL II is unable to
obtain long-term financing to replace borrowings under the
warehouse facility, Trinity may decide to satisfy TRL IIs
indebtedness under the warehouse facility or the lenders under
the warehouse facility may foreclose on the portion of TRL
IIs lease fleet pledged to secure this facility. As of
December 31, 2007, there was $309.8 million of
indebtedness outstanding and $90.2 million was available
under the warehouse facility. In February 2008, this facility
was increased to $600 million with the availability period
of the facility remaining through August 2009.
We may be unable to re-market leased railcars on favorable
terms, which could result in lower lease utilization rates and
reduced revenues. The profitability of our
railcar leasing business is dependent in part on our ability to
re-lease or sell railcars we own upon the expiration of existing
lease terms. Our ability to re-lease or sell leased railcars
profitably is dependent upon several factors, including, among
others:
|
|
|
|
|
the cost of and demand for newer or specific use models;
|
|
|
|
the availability in the market generally of other used or new
railcars;
|
|
|
|
the degree of obsolescence of leased railcars;
|
|
|
|
the prevailing market and economic conditions, including
interest and inflation rates;
|
|
|
|
the need for refurbishment;
|
|
|
|
the cost of materials and labor; and
|
|
|
|
the volume of railcar traffic.
|
A downturn in the industries in which our lessees operate and
decreased demand for railcars could also increase our exposure
to re-market risk because lessees may demand shorter lease
terms, requiring us to re-market
9
leased railcars more frequently. Furthermore, the resale market
for previously leased railcars has a limited number of potential
buyers. Our inability to re-lease or sell leased railcars on
favorable terms could result in lower lease utilization rates
and reduced revenues.
TILCs reserve for credit losses may prove
inadequate. Our reserve for possible credit
losses is maintained based upon managements judgment of
losses, history, and risks inherent in the railcar lease
portfolio. We periodically review our reserve for adequacy
considering economic conditions and trends, and collateral
values; car type concentration risk including our ability to
re-market railcars, utilization levels of the lease fleet,
market conditions of various industries, credit quality
indicators; including external credit reports, past charge-off
experiences and levels of past due receivables. We cannot be
certain that our reserve for credit losses will be adequate over
time to cover credit losses in our portfolio because of
unanticipated adverse changes in the economy or events adversely
affecting specific customers, industries or markets. If the
credit quality of our customer base materially deteriorates, our
reserves may be inadequate to cover credit losses, and any such
losses could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operations or overall financial condition.
Fluctuations in the supply of component parts used in the
production of our railcar-related and structural wind tower
products could have a material adverse effect on our ability to
cost-effectively manufacture and sell our
products. A significant portion of our business
depends on the adequate supply of numerous specialty components
such as brakes, wheels, side frames, bolsters, bearings, and
flanges at competitive prices. We depend on third-party
suppliers for a significant portion of our component part needs.
Specialty components comprise a significant portion of the
production cost of each railcar we manufacture. Due to
consolidations and challenging industry conditions, the number
of alternative suppliers of specialty components has declined in
recent years, though generally a minimum of two suppliers
continue to produce each type of component we use in our
products. While we endeavor to be diligent in contractual
relationships with our suppliers, a significant decrease in the
availability of specialty components could materially increase
our cost of goods sold or prevent us from manufacturing our
products on a timely basis.
Reductions in the availability of energy supplies or an
increase in energy costs may increase our operating
costs. We use natural gas at our manufacturing
facilities and use diesel fuel in vehicles to transport our
products to customers and to operate our plant equipment. Over
the past three years, prices for natural gas have fluctuated
significantly. An outbreak or escalation of hostilities between
the United States and any foreign power and, in particular, a
prolonged armed conflict in the Middle East, could result in a
real or perceived shortage of petroleum
and/or
natural gas, which could result in an increase in the cost of
natural gas or energy in general. Hurricanes or other natural
disasters could result in a real or perceived shortage of
petroleum
and/or
natural gas, which could result in an increase in natural gas
prices or general energy costs. Future limitations on the
availability or consumption of petroleum products
and/or an
increase in energy costs, particularly natural gas for plant
operations and diesel fuel for vehicles and plant equipment,
could have an adverse effect upon our ability to conduct our
business cost effectively.
Our manufacturers warranties expose us to potentially
significant claims. Depending on the product, we
warrant against manufacturing defects due to our workmanship and
certain materials pursuant to express limited contractual
warranties. Accordingly, we may be subject to significant
warranty claims in the future such as multiple claims based on
one defect repeated throughout our mass production process or
claims for which the cost of repairing or replacing the
defective part is highly disproportionate to the original cost
of the part. These types of warranty claims could result in
costly product recalls, significant repair costs, and damage to
our reputation.
Increasing insurance claims and expenses could lower
profitability and increase business risk. The
nature of our business subjects us to product liability,
property damage, and personal injury claims, especially in
connection with the repair and manufacture of products that
transport hazardous, toxic or volatile materials. We maintain
reserves for reasonably estimable liability and liability
insurance coverage at levels based upon commercial norms in the
industries in which we operate and our historical claims
experience. Over the last several years, insurance carriers have
raised premiums for many companies operating in our industries.
Increased premiums may further increase our insurance expense as
coverage expires or otherwise cause us to raise our self-insured
retention. If the number or severity of claims within our
self-insured retention increases, we could suffer costs in
excess of our reserves. An unusually large liability claim or a
string of claims based on a failure repeated throughout our mass
10
production process may exceed our insurance coverage or result
in direct damages if we were unable or elected not to insure
against certain hazards because of high premiums or other
reasons. In addition, the availability of, and our ability to
collect on, insurance coverage is often subject to factors
beyond our control. Moreover, any accident or incident involving
us, even if we are fully insured or not held to be liable, could
negatively affect our reputation among customers and the public,
thereby making it more difficult for us to compete effectively,
and could significantly affect the cost and availability of
insurance in the future.
Risks related to our operations outside of the United States
could decrease our profitability. Our operations
outside of the United States are subject to the risks associated
with cross-border business transactions and activities.
Political, legal, trade, or economic changes or instability
could limit or curtail our respective foreign business
activities and operations. Some foreign countries where we
operate have regulatory authorities that regulate railroad
safety, railcar design and railcar component part design,
performance, and manufacture of equipment used on their railroad
systems. If we fail to obtain and maintain certifications of our
railcars and railcar parts within the various foreign countries
where we operate, we may be unable to market and sell our
railcars in those countries. In addition, unexpected changes in
regulatory requirements, tariffs and other trade barriers, more
stringent rules relating to labor or the environment, adverse
tax consequences, and price exchange controls could limit
operations and make the manufacture and distribution of our
products difficult. Furthermore, any material change in the
quotas, regulations, or duties on imports imposed by the United
States government and agencies, or on exports by the government
of Mexico or its agencies, could affect our ability to export
products that we manufacture in Mexico.
Because we do not have employment contracts with our key
management employees, we may not be able to retain their
services in the future. Our success depends on
the continued services of our key management employees, none of
whom currently have employment agreements with us. Although we
have historically been successful in retaining the services of
our key management, we may not be able to do so in the future.
The loss of the services of one or more key members of our
management team could result in increased costs associated with
attracting and retaining a replacement and could disrupt our
operations and result in a loss of revenues.
Repercussions from terrorist activities or armed conflict
could harm our business. Terrorist activities,
anti-terrorist efforts, and other armed conflict involving the
United States or its interests abroad may adversely affect the
United States and global economies and could prevent us from
meeting our financial and other obligations. In particular, the
negative impacts of these events may affect the industries in
which we operate. This could result in delays in or
cancellations of the purchase of our products or shortages in
raw materials or component parts. Any of these occurrences could
have a material adverse impact on our operating results,
revenues, and costs.
Violations of or changes in the regulatory requirements
applicable to the industries in which we operate may increase
our operating costs. We are subject to extensive
regulation by governmental regulatory and industry authorities.
Our railcar operations are subject to regulation by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency; the Research and Special
Programs Administration, a division of the United States
Department of Transportation; the Federal Railroad
Administration, a division of the United States Department of
Transportation; and the Association of American Railroads. These
organizations establish rules and regulations for the railcar
industry, including construction specifications and standards
for the design and manufacture of railcars; mechanical,
maintenance, and related standards for railcars; safety of
railroad equipment, tracks, and operations; and packaging and
transportation of hazardous or toxic materials. Future changes
that affect compliance costs may have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and operations.
Our Inland Barge operations are subject to regulation by the
United States Coast Guard; the National Transportation Safety
Board; the United States Customs Service; the Maritime
Administration of the United States Department of
Transportation; and private industry organizations such as the
American Bureau of Shipping. These organizations establish
safety criteria, investigate vessel accidents and recommend
improved safety standards. Violations of these regulations and
related laws can result in substantial civil and criminal
penalties as well as injunctions curtailing operations.
Our operations are also subject to regulation of health and
safety matters by the United States Occupational Safety and
Health Administration. We believe that we employ appropriate
precautions to protect our employees and others from workplace
injuries and harmful exposure to materials handled and managed
at our facilities. However, claims that may be asserted against
us for work-related illnesses or injury, and the further
adoption of occupational
11
health and safety regulations in the United States or in foreign
jurisdictions in which we operate could increase our operating
costs. We are unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance
with these health and safety laws and regulations. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that we will not become involved in
future litigation, investigations, or other proceedings or if we
were found to be responsible or liable in any litigation,
investigations, or proceedings, that such costs would not be
material to us.
We may be required to reduce our inventory carrying values,
which would negatively impact our financial condition and
results of operations. To support our production
line continuity, we ended 2007 with a higher level of railcars
in our finished goods inventory than in 2006, due to our
decision to build railcars in anticipation of demand from TILC
and external customers, including TRIP. We expect to sell this
inventory in the normal course of business. We are required to
record all our inventories at the lower of cost or market. In
assessing the ultimate realization of inventories, we are
required to make judgments in respect to demand requirements and
compare those with the current or committed inventory levels. We
have historically recorded reductions in inventory carrying
values when product lines are discontinued or market conditions
change as a result of changes in demand requirements. We may be
required to reduce inventory carrying values in the future due
to a severe decline in market conditions, which could have an
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
We may be required to reduce the value of our long-lived
assets
and/or
goodwill, which would weaken our results of
operations. We periodically evaluate for
potential impairment the carrying values of our long-lived
assets to be held and used. The carrying value of a long-lived
asset to be held and used is considered impaired when the
carrying value is not recoverable through undiscounted future
cash flows and the fair value of the asset is less than the
carrying value. Fair value is determined primarily using the
anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with
the risks involved or market quotes as available. Impairment
losses on long-lived assets held for sale are determined in a
similar manner, except that fair values are reduced commensurate
with the estimated cost to dispose of the assets. In addition,
we are required, at least annually, to evaluate goodwill related
to acquired businesses for potential impairment indicators that
are based primarily on market conditions in the United States
and the operational performance of our reporting units. Future
events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators
exist and that goodwill associated with our acquired businesses
is impaired. Any resulting impairment loss related to reductions
in the value of our long-lived assets or our goodwill could
weaken our financial condition and results of operations.
We may incur increased costs due to fluctuations in interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We are
exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates
and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We seek to
minimize these risks, when considered appropriate, through the
use of currency and interest rate hedges and similar financial
instruments and other activities, although these measures may
not be implemented or effective. Any material and untimely
changes in interest rates or exchange rates could result in
significant losses to us.
Additional Information. Our Internet website
address is www.trin.net. Information on the website is available
free of charge. We make available on our website our annual
report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and any amendments thereto, as soon as reasonably practicable
after such material is filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
None.
12
We principally operate in various locations throughout the
United States and in Mexico all of which are considered to be in
good condition, well maintained, and adequate for our purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Utilized
|
|
|
Rail Group
|
|
|
5,768,300
|
|
|
|
310,800
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
Construction Products Group
|
|
|
1,027,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
Inland Barge Group
|
|
|
897,800
|
|
|
|
47,900
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
Energy Equipment Group
|
|
|
1,446,500
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
Executive Offices
|
|
|
173,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,312,600
|
|
|
|
370,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
See Note 19 Commitments and Contingencies.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
None.
13
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange with
the ticker symbol TRN. The following table shows the
price range of our common stock for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
44.70
|
|
|
$
|
34.26
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
47.94
|
|
|
|
40.04
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
46.89
|
|
|
|
33.10
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
40.01
|
|
|
|
24.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
38.00
|
|
|
$
|
28.50
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
47.70
|
|
|
|
30.43
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
40.16
|
|
|
|
30.67
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
39.73
|
|
|
|
30.92
|
|
Our transfer agent and registrar as of December 31, 2007
was American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.
Holders
At December 31, 2007, we had approximately 1,778 record
holders of common stock. The par value of the common stock is
$1.00 per share.
Dividends
Trinity has paid 175 consecutive quarterly dividends. The
quarterly dividend was increased to $0.07 per common share
effective with the October 2007 payment, an increase of over 16%
as compared to the July 2007 payment. This compares to $0.06 per
common share, where it had been since July 2006. Quarterly
dividends declared by Trinity for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31,
|
|
$
|
0
|
.06
|
|
$
|
0
|
.045
|
(a)
|
Quarter ended June 30,
|
|
|
0
|
.06
|
|
$
|
0
|
.045
|
(a)
|
Quarter ended September 30,
|
|
|
0
|
.07
|
|
|
0
|
.06
|
|
Quarter ended December 31,
|
|
|
0
|
.07
|
|
|
0
|
.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0
|
.26
|
|
$
|
0
|
.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Dividend is split adjusted for the first and second quarters of
2006. |
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
14
Performance
Graph
The following Performance Graph and related information shall
not be deemed soliciting material or to be
filed with the SEC, nor shall such information be
incorporated by reference into any future filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each
as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference into such filing.
The following graph compares the Companys cumulative total
stockholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) during
the five-year period ended December 31, 2007 with an
overall stock market index (New York Stock Exchange index) and
the Companys peer group index (Dow Jones Commercial
Vehicles & Trucks Index). The data in the graph
assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Trinity Industries, Inc.
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Dow Jones Commercial Vehicles & Trucks Index
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
New York Stock Exchange Index
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
This table provides information with respect to purchases by the
Company of shares of its Common Stock during the quarter ended
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
Dollar Value) of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
that May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Paid per
|
|
|
Plans or
|
|
|
Under the Plans
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Share(1)
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
October 1, 2007 through October 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1, 2007 through November 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007
|
|
|
104,200
|
|
|
$
|
27.51
|
|
|
|
104,200
|
|
|
$
|
197,133,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
104,200
|
|
|
$
|
27.51
|
|
|
|
104,200
|
|
|
$
|
197,133,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These columns include the following transaction during the three
months ended December 31, 2007: (i) the purchase of
104,200 shares of Common Stock on the open market as part
of the Stock Repurchase Program. This Stock Repurchase Program
was authorized by the Companys Board of Directors on
December 13, 2007 allowing the Company to repurchase
$200 million of its common stock through December 31,
2009. As of December 31, 2007, 104,200 shares with a
value of approximately $2.9 million have been repurchased
under this program. |
15
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
The following financial information for the five years ended
December 31, 2007 has been derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements. Historical information has
been reclassified to conform to the 2007 presentation of
discontinued operations. This information should be read in
conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
elsewhere herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except percent and per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,832.8
|
|
|
$
|
3,218.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,709.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,965.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,259.9
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
512.8
|
|
|
|
382.6
|
|
|
|
204.1
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
293.8
|
|
|
|
215.5
|
|
|
|
110.5
|
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of discontinued operations, net of provision for
income taxes of $12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of provision
(benefit) for income taxes of $(0.2), $(1.7), $(8.3), $1.5 and
$2.1
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
293.1
|
|
|
$
|
230.1
|
|
|
$
|
86.3
|
|
|
$
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
293.1
|
|
|
$
|
230.1
|
|
|
$
|
83.1
|
|
|
$
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders per common
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.72
|
|
|
$
|
2.99
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3.65
|
|
|
$
|
2.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.65
|
|
|
$
|
2.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
78.7
|
|
|
|
76.9
|
|
|
|
71.0
|
|
|
|
69.8
|
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
79.3
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
|
|
|
69.8
|
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,043.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,425.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,586.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,210.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,007.9
|
|
Debt recourse
|
|
|
730.3
|
|
|
|
772.4
|
|
|
|
432.7
|
|
|
|
475.3
|
|
|
|
298.5
|
|
Debt non-recourse
|
|
|
643.9
|
|
|
|
426.5
|
|
|
|
256.3
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
96.7
|
|
Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
57.8
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,726.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,403.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,114.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,012.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,003.8
|
|
Ratio of total debt to total capital
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
46.1
|
%
|
|
|
37.0
|
%
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
21.21
|
|
|
$
|
17.54
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
$
|
14.13
|
|
|
$
|
14.36
|
|
16
Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Company
Overview
Trinity Industries, Inc., headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is a
multi-industry company that owns a variety of market-leading
businesses which provides products and services for the
industrial, energy, transportation, and construction sectors. We
operate in five distinct business groups which we report on a
segment basis: the Rail Group, Construction Products Group,
Inland Barge Group, Energy Equipment Group, and Railcar Leasing
and Management Services Group. We also report All Other which
includes the Companys captive insurance and transportation
companies, legal and environmental costs associated with
non-operating facilities, other peripheral businesses, and the
change in market valuation related to ineffective commodity
hedges.
Our Rail and Inland Barge Groups and our structural wind towers
business operate in cyclical industries. In 2007, we continued
to experience strong industrial activity in the manufacturing
sector. We continually assess our manufacturing capacity and
take steps to align our production facilities in line with the
nature of the demand. Our Construction Products and Energy
Equipment Groups are subject to seasonal fluctuations with the
first quarter historically being the weakest quarter.
Fluctuations in the Railcar Leasing and Management Services
Group are primarily driven by car sales from the lease fleet.
Executive
Summary
The Companys revenues for 2007 exceeded $3.8 billion.
Our Rail Group provided external revenues of more than
$1.5 billion. Operating profit from continuing operations
was $512.8 million for 2007. The Rail Group provided the
highest operating profits from external revenues of
$209.6 million.
We experienced increases in both income from continuing
operations and net income over the prior year. Income from
continuing operations increased $78.3 million and net
income increased $63.0 million.
Capital expenditures for 2007 exceeded $890 million with
approximately $700 million utilized for lease fleet
additions, net of deferred profit of $138 million.
In 2007, Trinity purchased 20% of the equity in newly-formed
TRIP Holdings LLC (TRIP Holdings) for
$21.3 million. TRIP Holdings provides railcar leasing and
management services in North America. Trinity also paid
$13.8 million in structuring and placement fees related to
the formation of TRIP Holdings that are being expensed on a pro
rata basis as railcars are purchased from Trinity by a
wholly-owned subsidiary of TRIP Holdings, TRIP Rail Leasing LLC
(TRIP Leasing). As of December 31, 2007,
$5.1 million of these structuring and placement fees have
been expensed. TRIP Holdings remaining equity is held by
five investors not related to Trinity or its subsidiaries.
Trinitys remaining equity commitment to TRIP Holdings is
$27.7 million, which is expected to be completely funded by
2009. As part of the transaction, TRIP Leasing plans to purchase
approximately $1.4 billion in railcars from Trinitys
Rail and Leasing Groups. Purchases of railcars by TRIP Leasing
are funded by capital contributions from TRIP Holdings and third
party debt. The Company has no obligation to guarantee
performance under the debt agreement, guarantee any railcar
residual values, shield any parties from losses, or guarantee
minimum yields.
We ended 2007 with a backlog in our Rail Group of approximately
$2.7 billion consisting of approximately 31,870 railcars.
Approximately 44% of our railcar total backlog was dedicated to
sales to external customers, which includes approximately 17% of
the total backlog of railcars dedicated to TRIP Leasing. The
remaining approximately 56% of our railcar backlog was dedicated
to the Leasing Group of which 100% have lease agreements for
these railcars with external customers. The final amount
dedicated to the Leasing Group may vary by the time of delivery.
Global Insight, Inc., an independent industry research firm, has
estimated that the average age of the North American freight car
fleet is approximately 19.3 years, with over 41% older than
25 years and has estimated that United States carload
traffic will expand by about 1.6% per year through 2011.
17
The table below is an average of the January 2008 estimates of
approximate industry railcar deliveries for the next
5 years from two independent third party research firms,
Global Insight, Inc. and Economic Planning Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
52,600
|
|
2009
|
|
|
52,400
|
|
2010
|
|
|
59,300
|
|
2011
|
|
|
61,700
|
|
2012
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
TILC purchases a portion of our railcar production, financing a
portion of the purchase price through a non-recourse warehouse
lending facility and periodically refinances those borrowings
through sale/leaseback and other leveraged lease or equipment
financing transactions. In 2007, TILC purchased approximately
36.4% of our railcar production, up from 30.9% in 2006. This
percentage increase is the result of a strategic decision to
grow the lease fleet. On a segment basis, sales to TILC and
related profits are included in the operating results of our
Rail Group but are eliminated in consolidation.
During 2007, the Construction Products Group, through wholly
owned subsidiaries, made a number of acquisitions for the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
an asphalt operation located in East Texas;
|
|
|
|
highway products companies operating under the names of Central
Fabricators, Inc. and Central Galvanizing, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
a combined group of East Texas asphalt, ready mix concrete, and
aggregates businesses operating under the name Armor
Materials; and
|
|
|
|
a number of assets in five separate smaller transactions.
|
The total cost of the acquisitions was approximately
$58.5 million, plus 325,800 shares of Trinity common
stock valued at $11.7 million, additional future cash
consideration of $10.7 million to be paid during the next
three to five years and contingent payments not to exceed
$6.0 million paid during the three year period following
the acquisition. The final acquisition costs are subject to
final adjustments in accordance with the purchase agreements. In
connection with the acquisitions, the Construction Products
Group recorded goodwill of approximately $41.7 million and
other intangible assets of approximately $5.3 million.
Annual revenues for the acquired businesses are estimated to be
approximately $81.0 million.
Also during 2007, the Construction Products Group sold the
following assets:
|
|
|
|
|
a group of assets located in South Texas including four ready
mix concrete facilities;
|
|
|
|
two ready mix concrete facilities located in the North Texas
area;
|
|
|
|
three ready mix concrete facilities located in West
Texas; and
|
|
|
|
a group of assets located in Houston, Texas which included seven
ready mix concrete facilities and an aggregates distribution
yard.
|
Total proceeds from the 2007 dispositions were
$42.9 million with an after-tax gain of $9.3 million.
Included in the after tax gain of $9.3 million was a
goodwill write-off of $1.9 million.
18
Results
of Operations
Years
Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
Overall
Summary for Continuing Operations
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007 versus 2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except percents)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rail Group
|
|
$
|
1,540.0
|
|
|
$
|
841.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,381.5
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
Construction Products Group
|
|
|
731.2
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
733.0
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Inland Barge Group
|
|
|
493.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493.2
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
Energy Equipment Group
|
|
|
422.4
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
433.9
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
|
|
|
631.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631.7
|
|
|
|
108.0
|
%
|
All Other
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
|
|
69.8
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
Eliminations lease subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(828.5
|
)
|
|
|
(828.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81.8
|
)
|
|
|
(81.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total
|
|
$
|
3,832.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,832.8
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2006 versus 2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except percents)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rail Group
|
|
$
|
1,516.9
|
|
|
$
|
625.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,142.6
|
|
|
|
18.0%
|
|
Construction Products Group
|
|
|
694.0
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
695.3
|
|
|
|
11.9%
|
|
Inland Barge Group
|
|
|
371.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371.2
|
|
|
|
54.2%
|
|
Energy Equipment Group
|
|
|
327.6
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
336.5
|
|
|
|
43.3%
|
|
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
|
|
|
303.5
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
303.7
|
|
|
|
49.1%
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
26.0%
|
|
Eliminations lease subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(620.0
|
)
|
|
|
(620.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.6
|
)
|
|
|
(65.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total
|
|
$
|
3,218.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,218.9
|
|
|
|
18.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Rail Group
|
|
$
|
1,418.3
|
|
|
$
|
398.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,816.3
|
|
Construction Products Group
|
|
|
616.8
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
621.6
|
|
Inland Barge Group
|
|
|
240.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240.7
|
|
Energy Equipment Group
|
|
|
224.7
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
234.8
|
|
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
|
|
|
203.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203.7
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
Eliminations lease subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(395.7
|
)
|
|
|
(395.7
|
)
|
Eliminations other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55.5
|
)
|
|
|
(55.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total
|
|
$
|
2,709.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,709.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased
due to higher total sales across all segments. Increased railcar
shipments to our Leasing Group yielded higher revenues for the
Rail Group. The increase in revenues for the Construction
Products Group can be attributed primarily to increased sales
volumes in our aggregates business, our entry into the asphalt
business, and an increase in various raw material costs that
have resulted in higher sales prices offset by decreased volumes
in our bridge girder and concrete businesses. Inland Barge Group
revenues increased primarily as a result of greater barge
shipments and a change in the mix of barges sold. An increase in
structural wind towers sales was the primary reason for the
increase in revenues in the Energy Equipment Group. Higher
rental revenues related to additions to the fleet and higher
average lease rates, and increased sales of cars from the lease
fleet drove the increase in revenue in the Railcar Leasing and
Management Services Group.
Our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased
across all segments. Increased railcar shipments to both
external customers and our Leasing Group yielded higher revenues
for the Rail Group. The increased revenue for the Construction
Products Group was primarily attributable to increased raw
material costs which were passed through to our customers in the
form of higher sales prices. The increase in hopper barge sales
was the primary attribute for increased revenue in our Inland
Barge Group. The increased sales of structural wind towers drove
the increased revenue in the Energy Equipment Group. The
increased revenue from the Railcar Leasing and Management
Services Group resulted from increases in the size of the fleet,
higher average lease rates and increased sales of cars from the
lease fleet.
Operating
Profit (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Rail Group
|
|
$
|
347.6
|
|
|
$
|
253.9
|
|
|
$
|
135.0
|
|
Construction Products Group
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
Inland Barge Group
|
|
|
72.6
|
|
|
|
44.5
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
Energy Equipment Group
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
|
|
|
161.2
|
|
|
|
106.5
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(34.9
|
)
|
|
|
(37.9
|
)
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)
|
Eliminations lease subsidiary
|
|
|
(138.0
|
)
|
|
|
(83.3
|
)
|
|
|
(50.4
|
)
|
Eliminations other
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total
|
|
$
|
512.8
|
|
|
$
|
382.6
|
|
|
$
|
204.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating profit for the year ended December 31, 2007
increased as the result of higher revenues, an increase in the
size of our lease fleet and higher average lease rates, and
increased sales of cars from the lease fleet offset by a
$15.0 million charge for the potential resolution of a
barge litigation settlement. Selling, engineering, and
administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased to
6.0% for 2007 compared to 6.5% for 2006. Overall, selling,
engineering, and administrative expenses increased
$20.8 million year over year as a result of increased
headcount and related costs, higher incentive costs, and
increased professional services.
Our operating profit for the year ended December 31, 2006
increased as the result of improved revenues, improved pricing,
increases in the size of our lease fleet, and cost savings due
to increased volumes in our manufacturing business. Selling,
engineering, and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenue decreased to 6.5% for 2006 compared to 6.7% for 2005.
Overall, selling, engineering, and administrative expenses
increased $26.9 million year over year as a result of
increased headcount and related costs, higher incentive costs,
and increased professional services.
Other Income and Expense. Interest expense,
net of interest income and capitalized interest of
$0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively, was
$64.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
$49.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Interest income in 2007 decreased $2.6 million over the
prior year primarily due to lower investment income as a result
of lower interest rates and a decrease in cash available for
investment. Interest
20
expense in 2007 increased $12.1 million over the prior year
due to an increase in debt levels. The decrease in Other, net
was primarily due to the write-down of an equity investment
partially offset by the gains on the disposal of property,
plant, and equipment and foreign currency gains.
Interest expense, net of interest income and capitalized
interest, was $49.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and $39.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005. Interest income increased
$11.7 million from the same period in 2005 due to an
increase in investments resulting from an increase in cash
available for investment primarily from the funding of the
Convertible Subordinated Notes, and higher interest rates.
During 2006 and 2005, the Company capitalized interest expense
of $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively, as
part of the cost of construction of facilities and equipment.
Interest expense increased $21.9 million over the same
period in 2005. The increase in interest expense was due to an
increase in debt levels and higher interest rates. Other, net
increased primarily due to gains on the disposal of property,
plant, and equipment, offset by the sale of an equity interest
in a leasing investment and royalties earned on the lease of
mineral drilling rights in the prior year.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate of 36.6%
for continuing operations for 2007 varied from the statutory
rate of 35.0% due primarily to state income taxes, offset by an
increase in the temporary credit to be applied against the State
of Texas margin tax, the benefit of the domestic production
deduction, and the utilization of capital losses previously not
benefited. The prior year effective tax rate for continuing
operations of 38.2% was greater than the statutory rate of 35.0%
due to state income taxes and the change in the State of Texas
margin tax. The effective tax rate for continuing operations for
2005 of 37.3% was greater than the statutory rate of 35.0% due
to state income taxes, the write-down of goodwill that was not
deductible for tax purposes, and the impact of certain foreign
tax losses in jurisdictions with a lower tax rate or in foreign
locations where tax benefits were not recorded.
Segment
Discussion
Rail
Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rail
|
|
$
|
2,221.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,917.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,655.3
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
Components
|
|
|
159.7
|
|
|
|
225.2
|
|
|
|
161.0
|
|
|
|
(29.1
|
)%
|
|
|
39.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
2,381.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,142.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,816.3
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
Operating profit
|
|
$
|
347.6
|
|
|
$
|
253.9
|
|
|
$
|
135.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit margin
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railcar shipments in 2007 increased 8.4% over 2006 shipments to
approximately 27,370 railcars compared to the railcars shipped
in 2006 and 2005 of approximately 25,240 and 22,930 railcars,
respectively. As of December 31, 2007, our Rail Group
backlog was approximately $2.7 billion and consisted of
approximately 31,870 railcars. Approximately 44% of our railcar
total backlog was dedicated to sales to external customers,
which includes approximately 17% of the total backlog dedicated
to TRIP Leasing. The remaining approximately 56% of our backlog
was dedicated to the Leasing Group of which 100% have lease
agreements for these railcars with external customers. The final
amount dedicated to the Leasing Group may vary by the time of
delivery. This compares to approximately 35,930 and 18,800
railcars in backlog as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, of
which approximately 51% and 31%, respectively, were dedicated to
the Leasing Group of which 100% had lease agreements for those
railcars with external customers. Sales for the year ended
December 31, 2007 included $232.6 million in cars sold
to TRIP Leasing, of which $8.2 million in profit was
deferred based on our 20% equity interest.
Operating profit for the Rail Group increased for the year ended
December 31, 2007 by $93.7 million compared to the
prior year. This increase was primarily due to increased
pricing, product mix, and volume, as well as improved operating
efficiencies.
21
The operating profit for the Rail Group increased for the year
ended December 31, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005
primarily due to increased pricing and volume. The year ended
December 31, 2005 was partially impacted by increased
warranty expense.
In the year ended December 31, 2007 railcar shipments
included sales to the Railcar Leasing and Management Services
Group of $828.5 million compared to $620.0 million in
2006 with a deferred profit of $138.0 million compared to
$83.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Railcar sales to the Railcar Leasing and Management Services
Group for 2005 were $395.7 million with a deferred profit
of $50.4 million. Sales to the Railcar Leasing and
Management Services Group and related profits are included in
the operating results of the Rail Group but are eliminated in
consolidation.
Condensed results of operations related to the European rail
business sold in August 2006 for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows and are excluded
from the segment information above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
70.8
|
|
|
$
|
137.2
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
|
178.5
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
(40.1
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
Products Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concrete and Aggregates
|
|
$
|
458.8
|
|
|
$
|
407.5
|
|
|
$
|
364.4
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Highway Products
|
|
|
239.1
|
|
|
|
232.5
|
|
|
|
205.6
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
51.6
|
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
733.0
|
|
|
$
|
695.3
|
|
|
$
|
621.6
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
Operating profit
|
|
$
|
58.2
|
|
|
$
|
61.5
|
|
|
$
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit margin
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in revenues for the year ended December 31,
2007 compared to the same period in 2006 was primarily
attributable to an increase in volume in our aggregates
business, our entry into the asphalt business, and price
increases in our concrete business offset by a decrease in
volumes in our bridge girder and concrete businesses. Revenues
increased for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to
the same period in 2005 primarily due to increased volumes and
increased raw material costs which resulted in higher sales
prices.
Operating profit and operating profit margin for the year ended
December 31, 2007 decreased due to higher production costs
in the highway products business and lost production days in our
concrete business as a result of inclement weather. Operating
profit for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the
same period in 2005 increased due to manufacturing efficiencies
in Highway Products. Operating profit margins were affected by
higher operating costs in Concrete and Aggregates compared to
the same period in 2005.
22
Condensed results of operations related to the weld pipe
fittings business sold in June 2006 for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows and are excluded
from the segment information above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
28.0
|
|
|
$
|
53.3
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inland
Barge Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
493.2
|
|
|
$
|
371.2
|
|
|
$
|
240.7
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
|
54.2
|
%
|
Operating profit
|
|
$
|
72.6
|
|
|
$
|
44.5
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit margin
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues increased for the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to the same period in 2006 due to an increase in the
sales of hopper barges and a change in the mix of barges sold.
The increase in revenues for the year ended December 31,
2006 compared to the same period in 2005 was due to increased
sales of hopper barges as well as increased raw material costs
which resulted in higher sales prices and a change in the mix of
barges sold.
Operating profit for the year ended December 31, 2007
increased compared to the same period in 2006 due to increased
revenues, a change in the mix of barges sold, and improved
margins due to operating efficiencies, partially offset by a
$15.0 million charge for the probable resolution of a barge
litigation settlement. Operating profit for the year ended
December 31, 2006 increased compared to the same period in
2005 primarily due to increased sales, a change in mix, and the
ability to pass on steel cost increases to our customers. Barge
litigation and related costs were $16.5 million for 2007,
which included a $15.0 million charge for the potential
resolution of a barge litigation settlement, compared to
$3.2 million and $3.5 million for 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Barge litigation settlements for the year ended
December 31, 2005 were $3.3 million. As of
December 31, 2007, the backlog for the Inland Barge Group
was approximately $752.8 million compared to approximately
$463.6 million and approximately $335.3 million for
2006 and 2005, respectively.
Energy
Equipment Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structural wind towers
|
|
$
|
245.9
|
|
|
$
|
148.6
|
|
|
$
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
%
|
|
|
125.2
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
188.0
|
|
|
|
187.9
|
|
|
|
168.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
433.9
|
|
|
$
|
336.5
|
|
|
$
|
234.8
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
Operating profit
|
|
$
|
50.1
|
|
|
$
|
45.7
|
|
|
$
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit margin
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Revenues increased for the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to the same periods in 2006 and 2005, due to higher
sales of structural wind towers. As of December 31, 2007,
the backlog for structural wind towers was approximately
$702.4 million compared to approximately
$248.5 million and approximately $111.4 million for
2006 and 2005, respectively.
Operating profit for the year ended December 31, 2007
increased compared to the same period in 2006 primarily due to
higher sales of structural wind towers. The operating profit
margin for the year ended December 31, 2007 is lower than
the same period in 2006 due to expansion costs related to
structural wind tower production and a weaker LPG tank market in
the United States and Mexico. The operating profit for the year
ended December 31, 2006 was higher than the prior year due
to increased sales of structural wind towers.
Railcar
Leasing and Management Services Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and management
|
|
$
|
272.4
|
|
|
$
|
215.0
|
|
|
$
|
168.3
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
Sales of cars from the lease fleet
|
|
|
359.3
|
|
|
|
88.7
|
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
|
|
305.1
|
%
|
|
|
150.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
631.7
|
|
|
$
|
303.7
|
|
|
$
|
203.7
|
|
|
|
108.0
|
%
|
|
|
49.1
|
%
|
Operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and management
|
|
$
|
112.0
|
|
|
$
|
83.2
|
|
|
$
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of cars from the lease fleet
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit
|
|
$
|
161.2
|
|
|
$
|
106.5
|
|
|
$
|
55.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and management
|
|
|
41.1
|
%
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of cars from the lease fleet
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit margin
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet utilization at year end
|
|
|
99.2
|
%
|
|
|
99.5
|
%
|
|
|
99.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues increased for the year ended December 31,
2007 compared to the same period last year due to increased
sales from the lease fleet, increased rental revenues related to
additions to the leasing and management fleet, and higher
average rental rates on the re-marketed fleet. Total revenues
increased for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to
the same period in 2005 due to increased rental revenues related
to additions to the lease fleet, higher average rental rates,
origination and management fees on leases sold to outside
parties, and sales of cars from the lease fleet.
Operating profit for leasing and management operations increased
for the year ended December 31, 2007 primarily due to an
increase in sales from the fleet, rental proceeds from fleet
additions, and higher average lease rates. Operating profit for
leasing and management operations increased for the year ended
December 31, 2006 primarily attributable to an increase in
the size of the fleet, higher average lease rates, improved
efficiencies in maintenance expenses, and a change in
depreciation expense due to the extension of the estimated
useful lives of railcars in the fourth quarter of 2005. Results
for the year ended December 31, 2007 included
$283.6 million in sales of railcars to TRIP Leasing that
resulted in a gain of $48.6 million, of which
$9.7 million was deferred based on our 20% equity interest.
To fund the continued expansion of its lease fleet to meet
market demand, the Leasing Group generally uses its non-recourse
warehouse facility or excess cash to provide initial financing
for a portion of the manufacturing costs of the cars. In August
2007, TILC amended, restated, and extended its $375 million
non-recourse warehouse facility through August 2009, amended
certain terms of the existing facility, and increased the
facility by $25 million to $400 million. In February
2008, this facility was increased to $600 million with the
availability period of this facility remaining through August
2009. See Financing Activities. Subsequently, the Leasing
Group generally
24
obtains long-term financing for the cars in the lease fleet
through long-term recourse debt such as equipment trust
certificates, long-term non-recourse operating leases pursuant
to sales/leaseback transactions, non-recourse asset-backed
securities, or recourse convertible subordinated notes.
We use a non-GAAP measure to compare performance for the Leasing
Group between periods. This non-GAAP measure is EBITDAR, which
is Operating Profit of the Leasing Group plus depreciation and
rental or lease expense, excluding the impact of sales of cars
from the lease fleet. We use this measure to eliminate the costs
resulting from financings. EBITDAR should not be considered as
an alternative to operating profit or other GAAP financial
measurements as an indicator of our operating performance.
EBITDAR is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit leasing and management
|
|
$
|
112.0
|
|
|
$
|
83.2
|
|
|
$
|
47.4
|
|
Add: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
Rental expense
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDAR
|
|
$
|
203.9
|
|
|
$
|
159.5
|
|
|
$
|
121.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDAR margin
|
|
|
74.9
|
%
|
|
|
74.2
|
%
|
|
|
72.4
|
%
|
The increase in EBITDAR was due to rental proceeds from fleet
additions and higher average lease rates on new and existing
equipment.
As of December 31, 2007, the Railcar Leasing and Management
Services Groups rental fleet of approximately 36,090 owned
or leased railcars had an average age of 4.5 years and an
average remaining lease term of 5.5 years.
All
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
69.8
|
|
|
$
|
55.2
|
|
|
$
|
43.8
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in revenues for the year ended December 31,
2007 over 2006 and 2005 was primarily attributable to an
increase in intersegment sales by our transportation company.
The increase in the operating profit for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was due to the increase in intersegment
sales, income related to the market valuation of commodity
hedges that are required to be marked to market, and a decrease
in costs associated with non-operating facilities. The operating
loss for the year ended December 31, 2006 was due to legal
and environmental costs associated with non-operating facilities
and the expense related to the market valuation of ineffective
commodity hedges. The operating loss in the year ended
December 31, 2005 was primarily due to costs associated
with non-operating plants.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
Flows
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by the
operating activities of continuing operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $344.6 million compared to
$113.4 million of net cash provided by the operating
activities of continuing operations for the same period in 2006.
This increase was primarily due to an increase in net income
from continuing operations for the year ended December 31,
2007, a smaller increase in inventories, and an increase in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The smaller increase
in inventory compared to the prior year was the result of large
increases required in 2006 related to an increase in production
volumes. There was $0.1 million of net cash required by the
operating activities of discontinued operations for the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to $17.4 million of
net cash provided by operating activities for discontinued
operations for the same period in 2006.
25
Investing Activities. Net cash required by
investing activities of continuing operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $534.8 million compared to
$555.8 million for the same period last year. Capital
expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2007 were
$894.1 million, of which $705.4 million were for
additions to the lease fleet. This compares to
$661.1 million of capital expenditures for the same period
last year, of which $543.6 million were for additions to
the lease fleet. Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and
equipment and other assets were $410.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, composed primarily of railcar
sales from the lease fleet, which included $283.6 million
to TRIP Leasing, and the sale of non-operating assets, compared
to $108.8 million for the same period in 2006 composed
primarily of railcar sales from the lease fleet and the sale of
non-operating assets. For the years ended December 31, 2007
and 2006, $51.0 million and $3.5 million of cash,
respectively, was required for acquisitions by our Construction
Products Group. For the year ended December 31, 2006, cash
provided by investing activities of discontinued operations of
$82.9 million was primarily due to the sales of our weld
fittings business and our European railcar business.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by
financing activities during the year ended December 31,
2007 was $168.4 million compared to $517.6 million for
the same period in 2006. We intend to use our cash to fund the
operations, expansions, and growth initiatives of the Company.
In June 2007, Trinity amended the $350 million revolving
credit facility to increase the permitted leverage ratio, and
add a senior leverage ratio, as well as other minor
modifications. In October 2007, Trinity again amended its
revolving credit agreement. This new agreement is a
$425 million revolving credit facility that matures
October 19, 2012. Other minor changes were made to the
agreement. At December 31, 2007, there were no borrowings
under our $425 million revolving credit facility.
In August 2007, TILC amended, restated, and extended its
$375 million non-recourse warehouse facility through 2009,
amended certain terms of the existing facility, and increased
the facility by $25 million to $400 million. In
February 2008, this facility was increased to $600 million
with the availability of the facility remaining through August
2009. This facility, established to finance railcars owned by
TILC, had $309.8 million outstanding at December 31,
2007. The warehouse facility is due August 2009 and unless
renewed will be payable in three equal installments in February
2010, August 2010, and February 2011. Railcars financed by the
warehouse facility have historically been refinanced under
long-term financing agreements. Specific railcars and the
underlying leases secure the facility. Advances under the
facility may not exceed 78% of the fair market value of the
eligible railcars securing the facility as defined by the
agreement. Advances under the facility bear interest at a
defined index rate plus a margin, for an
all-in-rate
of 6.38% at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007,
$90.2 million was available under this facility.
On December 13, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a $200 million stock repurchase program of its
common stock. This program allows for the repurchase of the
Companys stock through December 31, 2009. As of
December 31, 2007, 104,200 shares with a value of
approximately $2.9 million had been repurchased under this
program.
Equity
Investment
See Note 5 Equity Investment.
Future
Operating Requirements
We expect to finance future operating requirements with cash
flows from operations, and depending on market conditions,
long-term and short-term debt and equity. Debt instruments that
the Company has utilized include its revolving credit facility,
the warehouse facility, senior notes, convertible subordinated
notes, asset-backed securities, and sale/leaseback transactions.
The Company has also issued equity at various times. The Company
assesses the market conditions at the time of its financing
needs and determines which of these instruments to utilize.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
See Note 4 Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group.
26
Derivative
Instruments
The Company uses derivatives instruments to mitigate the impact
of increases in zinc, natural gas and diesel fuel prices and
interest rates, as well as to convert a portion of its
variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. We also use derivatives
to lock in fixed interest rates in anticipation of future debt
issuances. For instruments designated as hedges, the Company
formally documents the relationship between the hedging
instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management
objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instrument.
This documentation includes linking the derivatives that are
designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets
or liabilities on the balance sheet, commitments, or forecasted
transactions. At the time a derivative contract is entered into,
and at least quarterly thereafter, the Company assesses whether
the derivative item is effective in offsetting the changes in
fair value or cash flows. Any change in fair value resulting in
ineffectiveness, as defined by SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133), as amended, is recognized in
current period earnings. For derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is
recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
(AOCL) as a separate component of stockholders
equity and reclassified into earnings in the period during which
the hedge transaction affects earnings. Trinity monitors its
derivative positions and credit ratings of its counterparties
and does not anticipate losses due to counterparties non-
performance.
Interest
rate hedges
In anticipation of a future debt issuance, the Company entered
into interest rate swap transactions during the fourth quarter
of 2006 and during 2007. These instruments, with a notional
amount of $370 million, hedge the interest rate on a future
debt issuance associated with an anticipated secured borrowing
facility that was originally scheduled to close in the fourth
quarter of 2007. Due to market conditions, the scheduled close
date of the future debt issuance was moved to the end of the
first quarter of 2008. The interest rate swap transactions were
renewed in the fourth quarter 2007 and will expire in the first
quarter of 2008. The weighted average fixed interest rate under
these instruments is 5.23%. These interest rate swaps are being
accounted for as cash flow hedges with changes in the fair value
of the instruments of $16.0 million of loss recorded in
AOCL. The effect on the consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2007 was expense of
$0.2 million due to the ineffective portion of the hedges
associated with anticipated interest payments that were not
made. If the future debt issuance is postponed again at the end
of the first quarter of 2008, the ineffective portion of the
hedges associated with future anticipated interest payments not
made will be charged to earnings. If the future debt issuance is
ultimately not completed, the entire amount of the fair value
change recorded in AOCL will be charged to earnings at the time
management determines the debt issuance is not probable.
During 2005 and 2006, we entered into interest rate swap
transactions in anticipation of a future debt issuance. These
instruments, with a notional amount of $200 million, fixed
the interest rate on a portion of a future debt issuance
associated with a railcar leasing transaction in 2006 and
settled at maturity in the first quarter of 2006. The weighted
average fixed interest rate under these instruments was 4.87%.
These interest rate swaps were being accounted for as cash flow
hedges with changes in the fair value of the instruments of
$4.5 million in income recorded in AOCL through the date
the related debt issuance closed in May 2006. The balance is
being amortized over the term of the related debt. At
December 31, 2007, the balance remaining in AOCL was
$3.8 million of income. The effect of the amortization on
the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 was income of $0.4 million
and $0.2 million, respectively.
Natural
gas and diesel fuel
We continued a program to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in
the price of natural gas and diesel fuel purchases. The intent
of the program is to protect our operating profit and overall
profitability from adverse price changes by entering into
derivative instruments. Since the majority of these instruments
do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, any change in
their valuation will be recorded directly to the consolidated
statement of operations. The amount recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet for these instruments was an asset of
$1.5 million as of December 31, 2007 and a liability
of $2.9 million as of December 31, 2006, with
$0.1 million of income and $0.4 million of expense in
AOCL, respectively. The effect on the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 was income
of $2.2 million and expense of $5.2 million for the
year ended December 31,
27
2006. The amounts recorded in the consolidated statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 for natural
gas and diesel fuel hedge transactions were not significant.
Zinc
In 2007, we entered into a program to mitigate the impact of
fluctuations in the price of zinc purchases. The intent of this
program is to protect our operating profit and overall
profitability from adverse price changes by entering into
derivative instruments. These instruments are short term with
monthly or quarterly maturities and no remaining balances
outstanding on the consolidated balance sheet or in AOCL as of
December 31, 2007. The effect on the consolidated statement
of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 was
income of $2.6 million.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We have a share-based compensation plan covering our employees
and our Board of Directors. See Note 1 Summary of
Significant Accounting Polices and Note 17 Stock-Based
Compensation.
Employee
Retirement Plans
As disclosed in Note 13 Employee Retirement Plans, the
projected benefit obligation for the employee retirement plans
exceeds the plans assets by $67.2 million as of
December 31, 2007 as compared to $95.8 million as of
December 31, 2006. The change was primarily due to a change
in the discount rate, contributions, investment returns, and
other actuarial variances. We continue to sponsor an employee
savings plan under the existing 401(k) plan that covers
substantially all employees and includes a Company matching
contribution of up to 6% based on our performance, as well as a
Supplemental Profit Sharing Plan.
Employer contributions for the year ending December 31,
2008 are expected to be $32.5 million for the defined
benefit plans compared to $16.1 million contributed during
2007. Employer contributions to the 401(k) plans and the
Supplemental Profit Sharing Plan for the year ending
December 31, 2008 are expected to be $7.0 million
compared to $6.0 million during 2007.
Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments
As of December 31, 2007, we had the following contractual
obligations and commercial commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After
|
|
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
|
|
Total
|
|
|
or Less
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt, excluding interest
|
|
$
|
1,374.2
|
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
$
|
392.5
|
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
|
$
|
912.3
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Purchase obligations(1)
|
|
|
438.0
|
|
|
|
426.6
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
86.1
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Leasing Group operating leases related to
sale/leaseback transactions
|
|
|
744.5
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
88.3
|
|
|
|
86.6
|
|
|
|
521.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
305.3
|
|
|
|
286.3
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,010.1
|
|
|
$
|
905.2
|
|
|
$
|
544.3
|
|
|
$
|
126.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,433.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-cancelable purchase obligations are primarily for steel and
railcar specialty components. |
On January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 48 (FIN 48). See Note 1 Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 12 Income
Taxes. As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately
$31.7 million of tax liabilities, including interest and
penalties, related to uncertain tax positions. Because of the
high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash
outflows associated with these liabilities, we are unable to
estimate the years in which settlement will occur with the
respective taxing authorities.
28
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis,
management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including
those related to bad debts, inventories, property, plant, and
equipment, goodwill, income taxes, warranty obligations,
insurance, restructuring costs, contingencies, and litigation.
Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical
experience and on various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies, among
others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Inventory
We state all our inventories at the lower of cost or market. Our
policy related to excess and obsolete inventory requires the
inventory to be analyzed at the business unit level on a
quarterly basis and to record any required adjustments. In
assessing the ultimate realization of inventories, we are
required to make judgments as to future demand requirements and
compare that with the current or committed inventory levels. It
is possible that changes in required inventory reserves may
occur in the future due to then current market conditions.
Long-lived
Assets
We periodically evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets
to be held and used for potential impairment. The carrying value
of long-lived assets to be held and used is considered impaired
when the carrying value is not recoverable through undiscounted
future cash flows and the fair value of the asset is less than
its carrying value. Fair value is determined primarily using the
anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with
the risks involved or market quotes as available. Impairment
losses on long-lived assets held for sale are determined in a
similar manner, except that fair values are reduced by the
estimated cost to dispose of the assets.
Goodwill
We are required, at least annually, to evaluate goodwill related
to acquired businesses for potential impairment indicators that
are based primarily on market conditions in the United States
and the operational performance of our reporting units.
Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment
indicators exist and that goodwill associated with our acquired
businesses is impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have
a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results
of operations.
Warranties
We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the
time we recognize revenue related to products covered by
warranties assumed. We base our estimates on historical warranty
claims. We also provide for specifically identified warranty
obligations. Should actual claim rates differ from our
estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would
be required.
Insurance
We are effectively self-insured for workers compensation
claims. A third-party administrator processes all such claims.
We accrue our workers compensation liability based upon
independent actuarial studies. To the extent actuarial
assumptions change and claims experience rates differ from
historical rates, our liability may change.
29
Contingencies
and Litigation
We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings. As
discussed in Note 19 Commitments and Contingencies, as of
December 31, 2007, we have accrued our estimate of the
probable settlement or judgment costs for the resolution of
certain of these claims. This estimate has been developed in
consultation with outside counsel handling our defense in these
matters and is based upon an analysis of potential results,
assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies.
We do not believe these proceedings will have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial position. It is possible,
however, that future results of operations for any particular
quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by
changes in our assumptions related to these proceedings.
Environmental
We are involved in various proceedings related to environmental
matters. We have provided reserves to cover probable and
estimable liabilities with respect to such proceedings, taking
into account currently available information and our contractual
rights of indemnification. However, estimates of future response
costs are necessarily imprecise. Accordingly, there can be no
assurance that we will not become involved in future litigation
or other proceedings or, if we were found to be responsible or
liable in any litigation or proceeding, that such costs would
not be material to us.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This annual report on
Form 10-K
(or statements otherwise made by the Company or on the
Companys behalf from time to time in other reports,
filings with the SEC, news releases, conferences, World Wide Web
postings or otherwise) contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Any statements contained herein that are not
historical facts are forward-looking statements and involve
risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements
include expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, future
financial performances, estimates, projections, goals, and
forecasts. Trinity uses the words anticipates,
believes, estimates,
expects, intends, forecasts,
may, will, should, and
similar expressions to identify these forward-looking
statements. Potential factors, which could cause our actual
results of operations to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements, include among others:
|
|
|
|
|
market conditions and demand for our products;
|
|
|
|
the cyclical nature of both the railcar and barge industries;
|
|
|
|
continued expansion of the structural wind towers business;
|
|
|
|
variations in weather in areas where construction products are
sold and used;
|
|
|
|
disruption of manufacturing capacity due to weather related
events;
|
|
|
|
the timing of introduction of new products;
|
|
|
|
the timing of customer orders;
|
|
|
|
product pricing changes;
|
|
|
|
changes in mix of products sold;
|
|
|
|
the extent of utilization of manufacturing capacity;
|
|
|
|
availability and costs of component parts, supplies, and raw
materials;
|
|
|
|
competition and other competitive factors;
|
|
|
|
changing technologies;
|
|
|
|
steel prices;
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
surcharges added to fixed pricing agreements for raw materials;
|
|
|
|
interest rates and capital costs;
|
|
|
|
long-term funding of our leasing warehouse facility;
|
|
|
|
taxes;
|
|
|
|
the stability of the governments and political and business
conditions in certain foreign countries, particularly Mexico;
|
|
|
|
changes in import and export quotas and regulations;
|
|
|
|
business conditions in foreign economies;
|
|
|
|
results of litigation; and
|
|
|
|
legal, regulatory, and environmental issues.
|
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on
which such statement is made. Trinity undertakes no obligation
to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances after the date on which such statement is made.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
Our earnings could be affected by changes in interest rates due
to the impact those changes have on our variable rate debt
obligations, which represented approximately 22.5% of our total
debt as of December 31, 2007. If interest rates average one
percentage point more in fiscal year 2008 than they did during
2007, and our debt level remained constant, our interest expense
would increase by $2.4 million. In comparison, at
December 31, 2006, we estimated that if interest rates
averaged one percentage point more in fiscal year 2007 than they
did during the year ended December 31, 2006, our interest
expense would increase by $0.1 million. A one percentage
point change in the interest rate would increase/decrease the
fair value of the fixed rate debt by approximately
$128.4 million. The impact of an increase in interest rates
was determined based on the impact of the hypothetical change in
interest rates and scheduled principal payments on our
variable-rate debt obligations as of December 31, 2007 and
2006.
Trinity uses derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of
increases in natural gas, diesel fuel prices, and zinc. Existing
hedge transactions as of December 31, 2007 are based on the
New York Mercantile Exchange for natural gas and heating oil.
Hedge transactions are settled with the counterparty in cash. At
December 31, 2007 we had recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet an asset of $1.5 million, and at
December 31, 2006 we had recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet a liability of $2.9 million. The effect on
the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was income of $4.8 million, and for
the year ended December 31, 2006 was expense of
$5.2 million.
The following table is an estimate of the impact to earnings
that could result from hypothetical price changes during the
year ending December 31, 2008 and the balance sheet impact
from the hypothetical price change, both based on hedge
positions at December 31, 2007.
Sensitivity
Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Commodity Price Change
|
|
Annual Pre-Tax Impact
|
|
Balance Sheet Impact
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
10 percent increase
|
|
Increase in income $1.2
|
|
Increase in asset $1.3
|
10 percent decrease
|
|
Decrease in income $1.2
|
|
Decrease in asset $1.3
|
In addition, we are subject to market risk related to our net
investments in our foreign subsidiaries. The net investment in
foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 is
$196.6 million. The impact of such market risk exposures as
a result of foreign exchange rate fluctuations has not been
material to us. See Note 11 Other, Net.
31
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
Trinity
Industries, Inc.
Index to
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
32
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Trinity Industries, Inc.
We have audited Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the COSO criteria). Trinity Industries, Inc.s management
is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on
the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Trinity Industries, Inc. as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders
equity for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007 of Trinity Industries, Inc. and our
report dated February 20, 2008 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst &
Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 20, 2008
33
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Trinity Industries, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders
equity for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Financial Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109, in 2007, and Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Shared-Based Payments
and No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), in 2006.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Trinity Industries, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 20, 2008
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst &
Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 20, 2008
34
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,832.8
|
|
|
$
|
3,218.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,709.7
|
|
Operating costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
3,091.1
|
|
|
|
2,628.2
|
|
|
|
2,324.4
|
|
Selling, engineering, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
228.9
|
|
|
|
208.1
|
|
|
|
181.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,320.0
|
|
|
|
2,836.3
|
|
|
|
2,505.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
512.8
|
|
|
|
382.6
|
|
|
|
204.1
|
|
Other (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
76.2
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(14.4
|
)
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
463.2
|
|
|
|
348.5
|
|
|
|
176.1
|
|
Provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
110.1
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
59.3
|
|
|
|
75.5
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169.4
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
293.8
|
|
|
|
215.5
|
|
|
|
110.5
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of discontinued operations, net of provision for
income taxes of $12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of benefit for income
taxes of $(0.2) $(1.7), and $(8.3)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
293.1
|
|
|
|
230.1
|
|
|
|
86.3
|
|
Dividends on Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
293.1
|
|
|
$
|
230.1
|
|
|
$
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders per common
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.72
|
|
|
$
|
2.99
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3.65
|
|
|
$
|
2.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.65
|
|
|
$
|
2.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
78.7
|
|
|
|
76.9
|
|
|
|
71.0
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
79.3
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
35
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
289.6
|
|
|
$
|
311.5
|
|
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4.0 at
December 31, 2007 and $3.8 at December 31, 2006)
|
|
|
296.5
|
|
|
|
252.5
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
302.6
|
|
|
|
316.5
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
127.3
|
|
|
|
139.1
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
156.8
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586.7
|
|
|
|
528.9
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, at cost
|
|
|
2,849.6
|
|
|
|
2,318.8
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(779.8
|
)
|
|
|
(728.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,069.8
|
|
|
|
1,590.3
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
503.5
|
|
|
|
463.7
|
|
Assets held for sale and discontinued operations
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
293.5
|
|
|
|
267.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,043.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,425.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
684.3
|
|
|
$
|
655.8
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recourse
|
|
|
730.3
|
|
|
|
772.4
|
|
Non-recourse
|
|
|
643.9
|
|
|
|
426.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,374.2
|
|
|
|
1,198.9
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
Liabilities held for sale and discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
198.4
|
|
|
|
116.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,316.5
|
|
|
|
2,022.1
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock 1.5 shares authorized and
un-issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock shares authorized 200.0;
shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2007 81.6; at December 31, 2006 80.0
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
538.4
|
|
|
|
484.3
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,177.8
|
|
|
|
908.8
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(61.6
|
)
|
|
|
(69.2
|
)
|
Treasury stock at December 31, 2007
0.2 shares; at December 31, 2006
0.0 shares
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,726.7
|
|
|
|
1,403.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,043.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,425.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
36
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
293.1
|
|
|
$
|
230.1
|
|
|
$
|
86.3
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
continuing operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) from discontinued operations, including gain on sale
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
118.9
|
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
|
|
76.2
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit from employee stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
59.3
|
|
|
|
75.5
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
Gain on disposition of property, plant, equipment, and other
assets
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(45.7
|
)
|
|
|
(26.6
|
)
|
|
|
(14.1
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables
|
|
|
(45.7
|
)
|
|
|
(33.8
|
)
|
|
|
(67.7
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in inventories
|
|
|
(50.9
|
)
|
|
|
(124.0
|
)
|
|
|
(65.2
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(53.2
|
)
|
|
|
(78.7
|
)
|
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
87.2
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
106.0
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(24.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities continuing
operations
|
|
|
344.6
|
|
|
|
113.4
|
|
|
|
125.2
|
|
Net cash (required) provided by operating activities
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
344.5
|
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
165.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of railcars from our leased fleet
|
|
|
359.3
|
|
|
|
88.8
|
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant, equipment, and
other assets
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Capital expenditures lease subsidiary
|
|
|
(705.4
|
)
|
|
|
(543.6
|
)
|
|
|
(345.8
|
)
|
Capital expenditures other
|
|
|
(188.7
|
)
|
|
|
(117.5
|
)
|
|
|
(87.7
|
)
|
Payment for purchase of acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(51.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash required by investing activities continuing
operations
|
|
|
(534.8
|
)
|
|
|
(555.8
|
)
|
|
|
(389.3
|
)
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash required by investing activities
|
|
|
(534.8
|
)
|
|
|
(472.9
|
)
|
|
|
(388.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments to retire debt
|
|
|
(129.5
|
)
|
|
|
(410.2
|
)
|
|
|
(49.2
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
304.8
|
|
|
|
920.1
|
|
|
|
223.6
|
|
Stock repurchases
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to common shareholders
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)
|
|
|
(16.3
|
)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
168.4
|
|
|
|
517.6
|
|
|
|
186.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(21.9
|
)
|
|
|
175.5
|
|
|
|
(36.6
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
311.5
|
|
|
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
172.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
289.6
|
|
|
$
|
311.5
|
|
|
$
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,
and 2005, net of $0.6 million, $0.3 million and
$0.7 million in capitalized interest for 2007, 2006, and
2005, respectively, was $71.5 million, $60.5 million,
and $38.5 million, respectively. Taxes paid, net of refunds
received, for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 were $71.3 million, $83.7 million, and
$13.3 million, respectively.
The Company issued 325,800 shares of its common stock
valued at $11.7 million in connection with an acquisition.
See Note 2 Acquisitions and Divestitures.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
$1.00
|
|
|
in Excess
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(200.0
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
of Par
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Authorized)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
at Cost
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
$
|
50.9
|
|
|
$
|
432.6
|
|
|
$
|
626.2
|
|
|
$
|
(25.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(71.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,012.9
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.3
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
Cash dividends on Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
Restricted shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
$
|
50.9
|
|
|
$
|
439.8
|
|
|
$
|
696.9
|
|
|
$
|
(40.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,114.4
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230.1
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231.5
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.7
|
)
|
Cash dividends on Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
|
Impact of adopting SFAS 158, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
Restricted shares issued
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Income tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
3-for-2
stock split (Note 1)
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Issuance of treasury stock used in
3-for-2
stock split
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
|
$
|
80.0
|
|
|
$
|
484.3
|
|
|
$
|
908.8
|
|
|
$
|
(69.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,403.5
|
|
Cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 (see Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293.1
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Change in funded status of pension liability, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300.7
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.0
|
)
|
Restricted shares issued
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
Shares repurchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
Shares issued for acquisition
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
Shares retained for taxes on vested restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
Income tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
|
$
|
81.6
|
|
|
$
|
538.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,177.8
|
|
|
$
|
(61.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,726.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles
of Consolidation
The financial statements of Trinity Industries, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries (Trinity,
Company, we or our) include
the accounts of all majority owned subsidiaries. The equity
method of accounting is used for companies in which the Company
has significant influence and 50% or less ownership. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
Stockholders
Equity
On May 15, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a
3-for-2
stock split on its common shares. The stock split was issued in
the form of a 50% stock dividend. All share and per share
information, including dividends, has been retroactively
adjusted to reflect the
3-for-2
stock split, except for the statements of stockholders
equity which reflect the stock split by reclassifying from
Capital in Excess of Par Value to Common
Stock the amount of $26.9 million which equals the
par value of the additional shares issued to effect the stock
split.
On December 13, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a $200 million stock repurchase program of its
common stock. This program allows for the repurchase of the
Companys stock through December 31, 2009. As of
December 31, 2007, 104,200 shares with a value of
approximately $2.9 million have been repurchased under this
program.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues for contracts providing for a large number of units and
few deliveries are recorded as the individual units are
produced, inspected, and accepted by the customer. This occurs
primarily in the Rail and Inland Barge Groups. Revenues from
construction contracts are recorded using percentage of
completion accounting, using incurred labor hours to estimated
total hours of the contract. Estimated losses on all contracts
are recorded when determined to be probable and estimable.
Revenue from rentals and operating leases are recorded monthly
as the fees accrue. Fees for shipping and handling are recorded
as revenue. For all other products, including structural wind
towers, we recognize revenue when products are shipped or
services are provided.
Income
Taxes
The liability method is used to account for income taxes.
Deferred income taxes represent the tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Valuation allowances reduce
deferred tax assets to an amount that will more likely than not
be realized.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (SFAS 109). This
interpretation, which became effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006, introduces a new
approach that changes how enterprises recognize and measure tax
benefits associated with tax positions and how enterprises
disclose uncertainties related to income tax positions in their
financial statements.
This interpretation applies to all tax positions within the
scope of SFAS 109 and establishes a single approach in
which a recognition and measurement threshold is used to
determine the amount of tax benefit that should be recognized in
the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
(1) the recognition, derecognition, and measurement of
uncertain tax positions in a period subsequent to that in which
the tax position is taken; (2) the accounting for interest
and penalties; (3) the presentation and classification of
recorded amounts in the financial statements; and
(4) disclosure requirements. The impact of the adoption
resulted in a change in accounting principles with a charge to
January 1, 2007, retained earnings of $3.1 million.
See Note 12 Income Taxes for further discussion of the
effect of adopting FIN 48 on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
39
Financial
Instruments
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments
purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentration of credit risk are primarily cash investments and
receivables. The Company places its cash investments in bank
deposits and investment grade, short-term debt instruments and
limits the amount of credit exposure to any one commercial
issuer. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to
receivables are limited due to control procedures to monitor the
credit worthiness of customers, the large number of customers in
the Companys customer base, and their dispersion across
different industries and geographic areas. The Company maintains
an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the expected
collectability of all receivables.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost
determined principally on the first in first out method. Market
is replacement cost or net realizable value. Work in process and
finished goods include material, labor, and overhead.
Property,
Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost and
depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the
straight-line method. The estimated useful lives are: buildings
and improvements 3 to 30 years; leasehold
improvements the lesser of the term of the lease or
7 years; machinery and equipment 2 to
10 years; information systems hardware and
software 2 to 5 years; and railcars in our
lease fleet generally 35 years. The costs of
ordinary maintenance and repair are charged to operating costs
while renewals and major replacements are capitalized.
Long-lived
Assets
The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of
long-lived assets to be held and used for potential impairment.
The carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used is
considered impaired when the carrying value is not recoverable
through undiscounted future cash flows and the fair value of the
asset is less than its carrying value. Fair value is determined
primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate
commensurate with the risks involved or market quotes as
available. Impairment losses on long-lived assets held for sale
are determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are
reduced for the estimated cost to dispose of the assets.
Impairment losses were not material for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment by reporting unit at least
annually as of December 31 by comparing the fair value of each
reporting unit to its book value. As of December 31, 2007,
the net book value of goodwill was $503.5 million.
Intangible assets with defined useful lives, which as of
December 31, 2007 had net book values of
$10.5 million, are amortized over their estimated useful
lives and are also, at least annually, evaluated for potential
impairment. Impairment losses were not material for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.
Insurance
The Company is effectively self-insured for workers
compensation. A third party administrator is used to process
claims. We accrue our workers compensation liability based
upon independent actuarial studies.
Warranties
The Company provides for the estimated cost of product
warranties at the time revenue is recognized and assesses the
adequacy of the resulting liability on a quarterly basis.
40
Foreign
Currency Translation
Operations outside the United States prepare financial
statements in currencies other than the United States dollar.
The income statement amounts are translated at average exchange
rates for the year, while the assets and liabilities are
translated at year-end exchange rates. Translation adjustments
are accumulated as a separate component of stockholders
equity and other comprehensive loss.
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in
equity of a business enterprise during a period from
transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner
sources. Comprehensive income consists of net income (loss),
foreign currency translation adjustments, the effective
unrealized portions of changes in fair value of the
Companys derivative financial instruments and the change
in the funded status of pension liability for the periods
subsequent to December 31, 2006. See Note 15
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (AOCL). All
components are shown net of tax.
Stock-Based
Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 123R Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R) which requires companies to
recognize in their financial statements the cost of employee
services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments.
These costs are based on the grant date fair-value of those
awards. Stock-based compensation includes compensation expense,
recognized over the applicable vesting periods, for both new
share-based awards and share-based awards granted prior to, but
not yet vested, as of January 1, 2006. The Company uses the
Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option pricing model to
determine the fair value of stock options granted to employees,
consistent with that used for pro forma disclosures under
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123). Stock-based compensation
totaled approximately $18.6 million and $14.0 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
The income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation
expense was $9.8 million and $12.2 million for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In
accordance with SFAS 123R, the Company has presented excess
tax benefits from the exercise of stock-based compensation
awards as a financing activity in the consolidated statement of
cash flows. No stock-based compensation costs were capitalized
as part of the cost of an asset for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
41
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company measured
compensation expense for its employee stock-based compensation
plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25). The
Company applied the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 as
amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation - Transition and Disclosure as if
the fair-value based method had been applied in measuring
compensation expense. Under APB No. 25, when the exercise
price of the Companys employee stock options was equal to
the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the
grant, no compensation expense was recognized. The effect of
computing compensation cost and the weighted average fair value
of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2005
using the BSM option pricing method for stock options is shown
in the accompanying table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Estimated fair value per share of options granted
|
|
$
|
9.27
|
|
Pro forma (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations applicable to common
shareholders, as reported
|
|
$
|
107.3
|
|
Add: Stock compensation expense related to restricted stock, net
of related income tax effect
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of
related income tax effects
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma income from continuing operations applicable to common
shareholders basic
|
|
|
105.7
|
|
Add: Effect of dilutive Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma income from continuing operations applicable to common
shareholders diluted
|
|
$
|
108.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma income from continuing operations applicable to common
shareholders per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations applicable to common
shareholders per common share as reported Basic
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black-Scholes assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected option life (years)
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
Common stock volatility
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve
financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity
to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently without having to
apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is
expected to expand the use of fair value measurement.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements.
The provisions of SFAS 159 and SFAS 157 are effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are
currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of
SFAS 159 and SFAS 157.
42
Managements
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to
the 2007 cash flow and tax footnote presentation.
Note 2.
Acquisitions and Divestitures
During 2007, the Construction Products Group, through wholly
owned subsidiaries, made a number of acquisitions for the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
an asphalt operation located in East Texas;
|
|
|
|
highway products companies operating under the names of Central
Fabricators, Inc. and Central Galvanizing, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
a combined group of East Texas asphalt, ready mix concrete, and
aggregates businesses operating under the name Armor Materials;
and
|
|
|
|
a number of assets in five separate smaller transactions.
|
The total cost of the acquisitions was approximately
$58.5 million, plus 325,800 shares of Trinity common
stock valued at $11.7 million, additional future cash
consideration of $10.7 million to be paid during the next
three to five years, and contingent payments not to exceed
$6.0 million paid during the three year period following
the acquisition. The final acquisition costs are subject to
final adjustments in accordance with the purchase agreements. In
connection with the acquisitions, the Construction Products
Group recorded goodwill of approximately $41.7 million and
other intangible assets of approximately $5.3 million.
Annual revenues for the acquired businesses are estimated to be
approximately $81.0 million.
Also during 2007, the Construction Products Group sold the
following assets:
|
|
|
|
|
a group of assets located in South Texas including four ready
mix concrete facilities;
|
|
|
|
two ready mix concrete facilities located in the North Texas
area;
|
|
|
|
three ready mix concrete facilities located in West Texas; and
|
|
|
|
a group of assets located in Houston, Texas which included seven
ready mix concrete facilities and an aggregates distribution
yard.
|
Total proceeds from the 2007 dispositions were
$42.9 million with an after-tax gain of $9.3 million.
Included in the after tax gain of $9.3 million was a
goodwill write-off of $1.9 million.
In June 2006, we sold our weld pipe fittings business
(Fittings). In August 2006, we also sold our
European Rail business (Europe).
43
Condensed results of operations relating to Fittings for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
28.0
|
|
|
$
|
53.3
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed results of operations relating to Europe for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
70.8
|
|
|
$
|
137.2
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
|
178.5
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
(40.1
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, we implemented a plan to divest our Brazilian
operations. Total net assets of these operations as of
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were
$2.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively. For the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, revenues and
net loss from these discontinued operations were insignificant.
Note 3.
Segment Information
The Company reports operating results in five principal business
segments: (1) the Rail Group, which manufactures and sells
railcars and component parts; (2) the Construction Products
Group, which manufactures and sells highway products, concrete
and aggregates, and girders and beams used in the construction
of highway and railway bridges; (3) the Inland Barge Group,
which manufactures and sells barges and related products for
inland waterway services; (4) the Energy Equipment Group,
which manufactures and sells products for energy related
businesses, including tank heads, structural wind towers, and
pressure and non-pressure containers for the storage and
transportation of liquefied gases and other liquid and dry
products; and (5) the Railcar Leasing and Management
Services Group, which provides fleet management, maintenance,
and leasing services. The category All Other includes our
captive insurance and transportation companies; legal,
environmental, and upkeep costs associated with non-operating
facilities; other peripheral businesses; and the change in
market valuation related to ineffective commodity hedges.
Historical segment information has been retroactively adjusted
to exclude the Fittings and Europe divestitures described in
Note 2 from the Construction Products and Rail Groups,
respectively.
Sales and related profits from the Rail Group to the Railcar
Leasing and Management Services Group are recorded in the Rail
Group and eliminated in consolidation. Sales of railcars from
the lease fleet are included in the Railcar Leasing and
Management Services Group. Sales between groups are recorded at
prices comparable to those charged to external customers. See
Note 5 Equity Investment for discussion of sales to a
company in which we have an equity investment.
44
The financial information from continuing operations for these
segments is shown in the tables below. We operate principally in
the continental United States and Mexico.
Year
Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation &
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Rail Group
|
|
$
|
1,540.0
|
|
|
$
|
841.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,381.5
|
|
|
$
|
347.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,172.2
|
|
|
$
|
23.6
|
|
|
$
|
83.3
|
|
Construction Products Group
|
|
|
731.2
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
733.0
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
342.4
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
Inland Barge Group
|
|
|
493.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493.2
|
|
|
|
72.6
|
|
|
|
115.8
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Energy Equipment Group
|
|
|
422.4
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
433.9
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
228.0
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
|
|
|
631.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631.7
|
|
|
|
161.2
|
|
|
|
2,039.9
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
705.4
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
|
|
69.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.9
|
)
|
|
|
345.0
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Eliminations-Lease subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(828.5
|
)
|
|
|
(828.5
|
)
|
|
|
(138.0
|
)
|
|
|
(247.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81.8
|
)
|
|
|
(81.8
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total
|
|
$
|
3,832.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,832.8
|
|
|
$
|
512.8
|
|
|
$
|
4,039.6
|
|
|
$
|
118.9
|
|
|
$
|
894.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation &
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Rail Group
|
|
$
|
1,516.9
|
|
|
$
|
625.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,142.6
|
|
|
$
|
253.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,037.8
|
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
|
$
|
50.0
|
|
Construction Products Group
|
|
|
694.0
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
695.3
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
299.0
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
Inland Barge Group
|
|
|
371.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371.2
|
|
|
|
44.5
|
|
|
|
100.6
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
Energy Equipment Group
|
|
|
327.6
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
336.5
|
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
|
168.8
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
|
|
|
303.5
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
303.7
|
|
|
|
106.5
|
|
|
|
1,550.0
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
|
|
|
543.6
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37.9
|
)
|
|
|
377.0
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Eliminations Lease subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(620.0
|
)
|
|
|
(620.0
|
)
|
|
|
(83.3
|
)
|
|
|
(169.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.6
|
)
|
|
|
(65.6
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total
|
|
$
|
3,218.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,218.9
|
|
|
$
|
382.6
|
|
|
$
|
3,414.8
|
|
|
$
|
87.6
|
|
|
$
|
661.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
Year
Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation &
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Rail Group
|
|
$
|
1,418.3
|
|
|
$
|
398.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,816.3
|
|
|
$
|
135.0
|
|
|
$
|
892.3
|
|
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
|
$
|
42.2
|
|
Construction Products Group
|
|
|
616.8
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
621.6
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
257.3
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
31.4
|
|
Inland Barge Group
|
|
|
240.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240.7
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
76.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Energy Equipment Group
|
|
|
224.7
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
234.8
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
119.7
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
|
|
|
203.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203.7
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
|
|
972.7
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
345.8
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)
|
|
|
196.2
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Eliminations Lease subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(395.7
|
)
|
|
|
(395.7
|
)
|
|
|
(50.4
|
)
|
|
|
(85.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55.5
|
)
|
|
|
(55.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total
|
|
$
|
2,709.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,709.7
|
|
|
$
|
204.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,454.4
|
|
|
$
|
76.2
|
|
|
$
|
433.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate assets are composed of cash and cash equivalents,
notes receivable, certain property, plant, and equipment, and
other assets. Capital expenditures do not include business
acquisitions.
Externally reported revenues and operating profit for our Mexico
operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and
2005 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External Revenues
|
|
|
Operating Profit
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
$
|
73.3
|
|
|
$
|
80.4
|
|
|
$
|
59.3
|
|
|
$
|
12.5
|
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
Total assets and long-lived assets for our Mexico operations as
of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
$
|
277.9
|
|
|
$
|
214.3
|
|
|
$
|
153.7
|
|
|
$
|
104.7
|
|
46
Note 4.
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
The Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group (Leasing
Group) provides fleet management, maintenance, and leasing
services. Selected combined financial information for the
Leasing Group is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
40.8
|
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
Leasing equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
Equipment on lease
|
|
|
1,996.7
|
|
|
|
1,511.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,032.8
|
|
|
|
1,546.6
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(214.4
|
)
|
|
|
(163.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,818.4
|
|
|
|
1,382.7
|
|
Restricted assets
|
|
|
129.1
|
|
|
|
111.6
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recourse
|
|
|
75.7
|
|
|
|
119.1
|
|
Non-recourse
|
|
|
643.9
|
|
|
|
426.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
631.7
|
|
|
$
|
303.7
|
|
|
$
|
203.7
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
161.2
|
|
|
|
106.5
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2007, revenues of
$283.6 million and operating profit of $38.9 million
are related to sales of cars from the lease fleet to a company
in which Trinity holds an equity investment. See Note 5
Equity Investment.
Interest expense, which is not a component of operating profit,
was $43.4 million, $34.5 million, and
$19.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006, and 2005, respectively. Rent expense, which is a component
of operating profit, was $45.1 million, $44.7 million,
and $49.2 million for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
Equipment consists primarily of railcars leased by third
parties. The Leasing Group purchases equipment manufactured by
Trinitys rail subsidiaries and enters into lease contracts
with third parties with terms generally ranging between one and
twenty years. The Leasing Group primarily enters into operating
leases. Future minimum rental revenues on leases in each year
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Future Minimum Rental Revenues on Leases
|
|
$
|
175.4
|
|
|
$
|
164.5
|
|
|
$
|
149.1
|
|
|
$
|
117.7
|
|
|
$
|
95.2
|
|
|
$
|
326.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,028.1
|
|
The Leasing Groups debt consists of both recourse and
non-recourse debt. See Note 10 Debt for the form and
maturities of the debt. Leasing Group equipment with a net book
value of approximately $936.9 million is pledged as
collateral for Leasing Group debt. Equipment with a net book
value of approximately $109.8 million is pledged as
collateral against operating lease obligations.
In prior years, the Leasing Group completed a series of
financing transactions whereby railcars were sold to one or more
separate independent owner trusts. Each trust financed the
purchase of the railcars with a combination of debt and equity.
In each transaction, the equity participant in the trust is
considered to be the primary beneficiary of the trusts. The
Leasing Group, through newly formed, wholly owned qualified
subsidiaries, leased railcars from the trusts under operating
leases with terms of 22 years, and subleased the railcars
to independent third party customers under shorter term
operating rental agreements. Under the terms of the operating
lease agreements
47
between the subsidiaries and trusts, the Leasing Group has the
option to purchase at a predetermined fixed price, certain of
the railcars from the trusts in 2016 and other railcars in 2019.
The Leasing Group also has options to purchase the railcars at
the end of the respective lease agreements in 2023, 2026, and
2027 at the then fair market value of the railcars as determined
by a third party, independent appraisal. At the expiration of
the operating lease agreements, the Company has no further
obligations with respect to the leased railcars.
These Leasing Groups subsidiaries had total assets as of
December 31, 2007 of $216.7 million, including cash of
$76.3 million and Leasing Group railcars of
$107.5 million. The rights, title, and interest in each
sublease, cash, and railcars are pledged to collateralize the
lease obligations to the trusts and are included in the
consolidated financial statements of the Company. Trinity does
not guarantee the performance of the subsidiaries lease
obligations. Certain ratios and cash deposits must be maintained
by the Leasing Groups subsidiaries in order for excess
cash flow, as defined in the agreements, from the lease to third
parties to be available to Trinity. Future operating lease
obligations of the Leasing Groups subsidiaries as well as
future minimum rental revenues related to these leases due to
the Leasing Group are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Operating Lease Obligations of Trusts Cars
|
|
$
|
48.5
|
|
|
$
|
47.6
|
|
|
$
|
40.7
|
|
|
$
|
41.7
|
|
|
$
|
44.9
|
|
|
$
|
521.1
|
|
|
$
|
744.5
|
|
Future Minimum Rental Revenues of Trusts Cars
|
|
$
|
57.4
|
|
|
$
|
47.2
|
|
|
$
|
37.1
|
|
|
$
|
29.3
|
|
|
$
|
23.2
|
|
|
$
|
80.1
|
|
|
$
|
274.3
|
|
In each transaction the Leasing Group has entered into a
servicing and re-marketing agreement with the trusts that
requires the Leasing Group to endeavor, consistent with
customary commercial practice as would be used by a prudent
person, to maintain railcars under lease for the benefit of the
trusts. The Leasing Group also receives management fees under
the terms of the agreements. In each transaction, an independent
trustee for the trust has authority for appointment of the
railcar fleet manager.
Note 5.
Equity Investment
In 2007, Trinity purchased 20% of the equity in newly-formed
TRIP Holdings LLC (TRIP Holdings) for
$21.3 million. TRIP Holdings provides railcar leasing and
management services in North America. Trinity also paid
$13.8 million in structuring and placement fees related to
the formation of TRIP Holdings that are being expensed on a pro
rata basis as railcars are purchased from Trinity by a
wholly-owned subsidiary of TRIP Holdings, TRIP Rail Leasing LLC
(TRIP Leasing). As of December 31, 2007,
$5.1 million of these structuring and placement fees have
been expensed. TRIP Holdings remaining equity is held by
five investors not related to Trinity or its subsidiaries.
Trinitys remaining equity commitment to TRIP Holdings is
$27.7 million, which is expected to be completely funded by
2009. As part of the transaction, TRIP Leasing plans to purchase
approximately $1.4 billion in railcars from Trinitys
Rail and Leasing Groups. Purchases of railcars by TRIP Leasing
are funded by capital contributions from TRIP Holdings and third
party debt. The Company has no obligation to guarantee
performance under the debt agreement, guarantee any railcar
residual values, shield any parties from losses, or guarantee
minimum yields.
Trinity Industries Leasing Company (TILC), a wholly
owned subsidiary of Trinity Industries, Inc. serves as manager
of TRIP Holdings and has the authority to bind TRIP Holdings and
perform all acts necessary to conduct the business of TRIP
Holdings. For its services as manager, TILC receives a monthly
administrative fee and a potential performance fee.
Additionally, a disposition fee may be earned by TILC if, no
more than twelve months prior to a liquidity event, TILC was
serving as the manager. The manager may be removed without cause
as a result of a majority vote of the non-Trinity equity
members. TILC also serves as servicer under an agreement between
TRIP Leasing and TILC, providing remarketing and management
services. For its services as servicer, TILC receives: 1) a
monthly servicing fee, 2) a broker fee on the purchase of
equipment by TRIP Leasing, and 3) a sales fee on the sale
of equipment by TRIP Leasing to an unaffiliated third party. The
servicer may be terminated upon the occurrence and during the
continuation of a servicer replacement event by a vote of the
lenders with credit exposure in the aggregate exceeding
662/3%.
48
Based on the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities (FIN 46R), TRIP Holdings does not
qualify as a variable interest entity. The equity method of
accounting is being used to account for Trinitys
investment in TRIP Holdings. Profit on equipment sales to TRIP
Leasing is recognized at the time of sale to the extent of the
non-Trinity interests in TRIP Leasing. The deferred profit on
the sale of equipment to TRIP Leasing pertaining to TILCs
interest in TRIP Holdings is amortized over the depreciable life
of the related equipment. All other fee income to TILC earned
from services provided to TRIP Holdings is recognized by TILC to
the extent of the non-Trinity interests in TRIP Holdings.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Rail Group sold
$232.6 million and TILC sold $283.6 million of
railcars to TRIP Leasing resulting in a gain of
$89.7 million, of which $17.9 million was deferred
based on Trinitys 20% equity interest. Fees for the same
period were insignificant. The purchases were financed with
borrowings by TRIP Leasing of $438.8 million and capital
contributions from TRIP Holdings.
Note 6.
Derivative and Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivatives instruments to mitigate the impact
of increases in zinc, natural gas and diesel fuel prices and
interest rates, as well as to convert a portion of its
variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. We also use derivatives
to lock in fixed interest rates in anticipation of future debt
issuances. For instruments designated as hedges, the Company
formally documents the relationship between the hedging
instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management
objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instrument.
This documentation includes linking the derivatives that are
designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets
or liabilities on the balance sheet, commitments, or forecasted
transactions. At the time a derivative contract is entered into,
and at least quarterly thereafter, the Company assesses whether
the derivative item is effective in offsetting the changes in
fair value or cash flows. Any change in fair value resulting in
ineffectiveness, as defined by SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133), as amended, is recognized in
current period earnings. For derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is
recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
(AOCL) as a separate component of stockholders
equity and reclassified into earnings in the period during which
the hedge transaction affects earnings. Trinity monitors its
derivative positions and credit ratings of its counterparties
and does not anticipate losses due to counterparties non-
performance.
Interest
rate hedges
From time to time, the Company enters into various interest rate
hedging transactions for the purpose of managing exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates and establishing rates in
anticipation of future debt issuances. The Company uses interest
rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy.
In anticipation of a future debt issuance, the Company entered
into interest rate swap transactions during the fourth quarter
of 2006 and during 2007. These instruments, with a notional
amount of $370 million, hedge the interest rate on a future
debt issuance associated with an anticipated secured borrowing
facility that was originally scheduled to close in the fourth
quarter of 2007. Due to market conditions, the scheduled close
date of the future debt issuance was moved to the end of the
first quarter of 2008. The interest rate swap transactions were
renewed in the fourth quarter 2007 and will expire in the first
quarter of 2008. The weighted average fixed interest rate under
these instruments is 5.23%. These interest rate swaps are being
accounted for as cash flow hedges with changes in the fair value
of the instruments of $16.0 million of loss recorded in
AOCL. The effect on the consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2007 was expense of
$0.2 million due to the ineffective portion of the hedges
associated with anticipated interest payments that were not
made. If the future debt issuance is postponed again at the end
of the first quarter of 2008, the ineffective portion of the
hedges associated with future anticipated interest payments not
made will be charged to earnings. If the future debt issuance is
ultimately not completed, the entire amount of the fair value
change recorded in AOCL will be charged to earnings at the time
management determines the debt issuance is not probable .
The Company has used interest rate swaps to fix the LIBOR
component of outstanding debt. These swaps are accounted for as
cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. As of December 31,
2006, Trinity had $65 million of interest
49
rate swaps outstanding to fix the LIBOR component of outstanding
debt. These swaps expired in the third quarter of 2007. The
effect on the consolidated statement of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was income of
$0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The
amount recorded in the consolidated balance sheet for these
instruments was an asset of $0.4 million as of
December 31, 2006 with $0.4 million of income in AOCL.
During 2005 and 2006, we entered into interest rate swap
transactions in anticipation of a future debt issuance. These
instruments, with a notional amount of $200 million, fixed
the interest rate on a portion of a future debt issuance
associated with a railcar leasing transaction in 2006 and
settled at maturity in the first quarter of 2006. The weighted
average fixed interest rate under these instruments was 4.87%.
These interest rate swaps were being accounted for as cash flow
hedges with changes in the fair value of the instruments of
$4.5 million in income recorded in AOCL through the date
the related debt issuance closed in May 2006. The balance is
being amortized over the term of the related debt. At
December 31, 2007, the balance remaining in AOCL was
$3.8 million of income. The effect of the amortization on
the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 was income of $0.4 million
and $0.2 million, respectively.
Natural
gas and diesel fuel
We continued a program to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in
the price of natural gas and diesel fuel purchases. The intent
of the program is to protect our operating profit and overall
profitability from adverse price changes by entering into
derivative instruments. Since the majority of these instruments
do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, any change in
their valuation will be recorded directly to the consolidated
statement of operations. The amount recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet for these instruments was an asset of
$1.5 million as of December 31, 2007 and a liability
of $2.9 million as of December 31, 2006, with
$0.1 million of income and $0.4 million of expense in
AOCL, respectively. The effect on the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 was income
of $2.2 million and expense of $5.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. The amounts recorded in the
consolidated statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2005 for natural gas and diesel fuel hedge
transactions were not significant.
Zinc
In 2007, we entered into a program to mitigate the impact of
fluctuations in the price of zinc purchases. The intent of this
program is to protect our operating profit and overall
profitability from adverse price changes by entering into
derivative instruments. These instruments are short term with
monthly or quarterly maturities and no remaining balances
outstanding on the consolidated balance sheet or in AOCL as of
December 31, 2007. The effect on the consolidated statement
of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 was
income of $2.6 million.
Fair
Value of Debt
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our long-term
debt at December 31, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes
|
|
$
|
450.0
|
|
|
$
|
406.0
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
201.5
|
|
|
|
198.5
|
|
Equipment trust certificates
|
|
|
75.7
|
|
|
|
75.5
|
|
Secured railcar equipment notes
|
|
|
334.1
|
|
|
|
334.1
|
|
Warehouse facility
|
|
|
309.8
|
|
|
|
309.8
|
|
The estimated fair values of our publicly held long-term debt
were based on quoted market prices. The fair values of all other
financial instruments approximate their carrying values as
amounts are being marked to market or are highly liquid.
50
|
|
Note 7.
|
Property,
Plant, and Equipment
|
The following table summarizes the components of property,
plant, and equipment as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Corporate/Manufacturing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
36.5
|
|
|
$
|
35.8
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
341.3
|
|
|
|
329.2
|
|
Machinery and other
|
|
|
608.0
|
|
|
|
538.6
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
79.8
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,065.6
|
|
|
|
943.1
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(565.4
|
)
|
|
|
(564.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.2
|
|
|
|
378.5
|
|
Leasing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
Equipment on lease
|
|
|
1,996.7
|
|
|
|
1,511.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,032.8
|
|
|
|
1,546.6
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(214.4
|
)
|
|
|
(163.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,818.4
|
|
|
|
1,382.7
|
|
Deferred profit on railcars sold to the Leasing Group
|
|
|
(248.8
|
)
|
|
|
(170.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,069.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,590.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We lease certain equipment and facilities under operating
leases. Future minimum rent expense on these leases in each year
is (in millions): 2008 $17.2; 2009
$16.3; 2010 $12.3; 2011 $8.2;
2012 $0.4; and $0.4 thereafter. See Note 4
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group for information
related to the lease agreements, future operating lease
obligations, and future minimum rent expense associated with the
Companys wholly owned, qualified subsidiaries.
We capitalized $0.6 million and $0.3 million of
interest expense as part of the cost of construction of
facilities and equipment during 2007 and 2006, respectively.
We estimate the fair market value of properties no longer in use
or held for sale based on the location and condition of the
properties, the fair market value of similar properties in the
area, and the Companys experience selling similar
properties in the past. As of December 31, 2007, the
Company had non-operating plants with a net book value of
$7.0 million. Our estimated fair value of these assets
exceeds their book value.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Companys
impairment test of goodwill was completed at the reporting unit
level and no impairment charges were recorded. Goodwill by
segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Rail
|
|
$
|
447.5
|
|
|
$
|
447.5
|
|
Construction Products
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Energy Equipment
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Railcar Leasing and Management Services
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
503.5
|
|
|
$
|
463.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
Note 9.
Warranties
The Company provides for the estimated cost of product
warranties at the time revenue is recognized related to products
covered by warranties and assesses the adequacy of the resulting
reserves on a quarterly basis. The changes in the accruals for
warranties for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and
2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
28.6
|
|
|
$
|
36.8
|
|
|
$
|
19.3
|
|
Warranty costs incurred
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
(20.4
|
)
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
Product warranty accrual
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable warranty costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
28.3
|
|
|
$
|
28.6
|
|
|
$
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the product warranty accruals in 2005 was due
primarily to an increase in product quantities covered by
warranties in 2005 as well as specific issues identified during
2005. In 2005, the product warranty accrual included
approximately $8.9 million related to our European
discontinued operations, of which $7.0 million of warranty
costs incurred was included in 2006. The recoverable warranty
costs in 2005 are primarily due to calculated warranty exposure
reimbursed to the Company by former owners of an acquired entity.
Note 10.
Debt
The following table summarizes the components of debt as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Corporate/Manufacturing Recourse:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving commitment
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes
|
|
|
450.0
|
|
|
|
450.0
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
201.5
|
|
|
|
201.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654.6
|
|
|
|
653.3
|
|
Leasing Recourse:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment trust certificates
|
|
|
75.7
|
|
|
|
119.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730.3
|
|
|
|
772.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing Non-recourse:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured railcar equipment notes
|
|
|
334.1
|
|
|
|
347.5
|
|
Warehouse facility
|
|
|
309.8
|
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643.9
|
|
|
|
426.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
1,374.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,198.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trinitys revolving credit facility requires maintenance of
ratios related to interest coverage for the leasing and
manufacturing operations, leverage, and minimum net worth. In
June 2007, Trinity amended the facility to increase the
permitted leverage ratio, and add a senior leverage ratio, as
well as other minor modifications. In October 2007, Trinity
again amended and restated its revolving credit agreement. This
new agreement is a $425 million revolving credit facility
that matures October 19, 2012. Other minor changes were
made to the agreement. At December 31, 2007, there were no
borrowings under our $425 million revolving credit
facility. After $93.2 million was considered for letters of
credit, $331.8 million was available under the revolving
credit facility.
52
In June 2006, the Company completed the sale of
$450 million of Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2036
(Convertible Subordinated Notes). The Convertible
Subordinated Notes bear an interest rate of
37/8%
per annum on the principal amount payable semi-annually in
arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, which began on
December 1, 2006. In addition, commencing with the
six-month period beginning June 1, 2018, and for each
six-month period thereafter, we will pay contingent interest to
the holders of the Convertible Subordinated Notes under certain
circumstances. The Convertible Subordinated Notes mature on
June 1, 2036, unless redeemed, repurchased, or converted
earlier. We may not redeem the Convertible Subordinated Notes
before June 1, 2018. On or after that date, we may redeem
all or part of the Convertible Subordinated Notes for cash at
100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed, plus
accrued and unpaid interest (including any contingent interest)
up to, but excluding, the redemption date. Holders of the
Convertible Subordinated Notes may require us to purchase all or
a portion of their notes on June 1, 2018 or upon a
fundamental change. In each case, the Convertible Subordinated
Notes would be purchased for cash at a price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any
accrued and unpaid interest (including any contingent interest)
to, but excluding, the purchase date. A conversion would
currently be based on a conversion rate of 19.1472 shares
of common stock per $1,000 principal amount, which is equivalent
to a conversion price of approximately $52.23 per share, on a
post-split basis. We used a portion of the proceeds from this
sale to retire $98.5 million of Senior Notes and
$0.7 million of Equipment Trust Certificates. The net
gain on these repurchases as well as the write-off of related
deferred loan fees were not significant.
In May 2006, Trinity Rail Leasing V, L.P., a limited partnership
(TRL-V) and a limited purpose, indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company owned through TILC issued
$355.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Secured
Railcar Equipment Notes,
Series 2006-1A
(the Secured Railcar Equipment Notes). The Secured
Railcar Equipment Notes were issued pursuant to a Master
Indenture, dated May 24, 2006, between TRL-V and Wilmington
Trust Company, as indenture trustee. These Secured Railcar
Equipment Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.9% per annum,
are payable monthly, and have a final maturity of May 14,
2036. These Secured Railcar Equipment Notes are limited recourse
obligations of TRL-V only, secured by a portfolio of railcars
and operating leases thereon, certain cash reserves, and other
assets acquired and owned by TRL-V.
The Companys
61/2%
senior notes (Senior Notes) due 2014 rank equally
with all of the Companys existing and future senior debt
but are subordinated to all the Companys existing and
future secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets
securing such debt. We may redeem some or all of the Senior
Notes at any time on or after March 15, 2009 at a
redemption price of 103.25% in 2009, 102.167% in 2010, 101.083%
in 2011 and 100.0% in 2012 and thereafter plus accrued interest.
The Senior Notes could restrict our ability to incur additional
debt; make certain distributions, investments, and other
restricted payments; create certain liens; merge; consolidate;
or sell substantially all or a portion of our assets. During the
second quarter of 2006, we repurchased $98.5 million of
Senior Notes, leaving an outstanding principal balance of
$201.5 million.
In August 2007, TILC amended, restated, and extended its
$375 million non-recourse warehouse facility through 2009,
amended certain terms of the existing facility, and increased
the facility by $25 million to $400 million. This
facility, established to finance railcars owned by TILC, had
$309.8 million outstanding at December 31, 2007. The
warehouse facility is due August 2009 and unless renewed will be
payable in three equal installments in February 2010, August
2010, and February 2011. Railcars financed by the warehouse
facility have historically been refinanced under long-term
financing agreements. Specific railcars and the underlying
leases secure the facility. Advances under the facility may not
exceed 78% of the fair market value of the eligible railcars
securing the facility as defined by the agreement. Advances
under the facility bear interest at a defined index rate plus a
margin, for an
all-in-rate
of 6.38% at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007,
$90.2 million was available under this facility. In
February 2008, this facility was increased to $600 million
with the availability period of the facility remaining through
August 2009.
TILCs
2002-1 Pass
Through Certificates bear interest at 7.755%. Equipment notes
issued by TILC for the benefit of the holders of the Pass
Through Certificates are collateralized by interest in certain
railcars owned by TILC and the leases pursuant to which such
railcars are leased to customers. The equipment notes, including
the obligations to make payments of principal and interest
thereon, are direct obligations of TILC and are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed by Trinity Industries, Inc. as
guarantor.
53
Principal payments due during the next five years as of
December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recourse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate/Manufacturing
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
652.7
|
|
Leasing equipment trust certificates (Note 4)
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-recourse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing secured railcar equipment notes (Note 4)
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
259.6
|
|
Leasing warehouse facility (Note 4)
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
199.1
|
|
|
|
99.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
$
|
276.3
|
|
|
$
|
116.2
|
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
|
$
|
13.8
|
|
|
$
|
912.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments under letters of credit, primarily related to
insurance, are $93.3 million, expiring $86.1 million
in 2008, $5.8 million in 2009, $1.3 million in 2010,
$ million in 2011 and 2012, and $0.1 million
after 2012.
Note 11.
Other, Net
Other, net (income) expense consists of the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
$
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.5
|
)
|
Foreign exchange transactions
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Write-down of equity investment
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Earnings) loss on equity investments
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
$
|
(14.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12.
Income Taxes
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, which became
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006, introduces a new approach that significantly changes how
enterprises recognize and measure tax benefits associated with
tax positions and how enterprises disclose uncertainties related
to income tax positions in their financial statements.
This interpretation applies to all tax positions within the
scope of SFAS 109 and establishes a single approach in
which a recognition and measurement threshold is used to
determine the amount of tax benefit that should be recognized in
the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
(1) the recognition, derecognition, and measurement of
uncertain tax positions in a period subsequent to that in which
the tax position is taken; (2) the accounting for interest
and penalties; (3) the presentation and classification of
recorded amounts in the financial statements; and
(4) disclosure requirements.
On January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of
FIN 48. As a result, we recorded a $3.1 million charge
to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. This
amount is inclusive of penalties and interest and net of
deferred tax assets that were recorded against uncertain tax
positions related to state income taxes and Federal and state
interest expense that was accrued.
Prior to the adoption of FIN 48, we had recorded
$8.3 million of tax contingency reserves. Additionally,
$20.7 million of deferred tax liabilities had been recorded
for items that have been identified as uncertain tax positions
that have now been reclassified as a FIN 48 liability. Upon
the adoption of FIN 48, we identified an additional
$3.0 million of taxes related to uncertain tax positions
which increased our total FIN 48 balance on
54
January 1, 2007 to $32.0 million. This amount was
charged to January 1, 2007 retained earnings as a
cumulative change in accounting principle.
The change in unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
32.0
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Expirations of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The additions for the year ended December 31, 2007, were
primarily due to deferred tax liabilities that have been
reclassed as uncertain tax positions.
The reduction for tax positions of prior years relates primarily
to temporary items that we had previously intended to take a
position on in the 2006 Federal Income Tax Return (tax
return) that would have resulted in an uncertain tax
position but eventually was not taken on the tax return when it
was filed. The nature of this item was temporary; therefore,
there was not an impact to the overall effective tax rate
related to this item.
At December 31, 2007, the statute of limitations for
assessing additional tax expired within the Czech Republic. We
therefore released $1.2 million of taxes that were
previously reserved. The remaining $0.3 million of
expirations was due to various state statutes of limitations for
assessing additional tax expiring.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at
December 31, 2007, that would affect the Companys
effective tax rate if recognized was $7.3 million. There is
a reasonable possibility that unrecognized Federal and state tax
benefits will decrease by December 31, 2008 due to a lapse
in the statute of limitations for assessing tax. Further, there
is a reasonable possibility that the unrecognized tax benefits
related to Federal and state tax positions will decrease
significantly by December 31, 2008 due to settlements with
taxing authorities. Amounts expected to settle or lapse in the
statute of limitations by December 31, 2008 are
$9.9 million.
Trinity accounts for interest expense and penalties related to
income tax issues as income tax expense. Accordingly, interest
expense and penalties associated with an uncertain tax position
are included in the income tax provision. The total amount of
accrued interest and penalties as of January 1, 2007 was
$5.8 million. The total amount of accrued interest and
penalties as of December 31, 2007 was $8.0 million.
Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2007,
includes $2.2 million in interest expense and penalties
related to uncertain tax positions.
The components of the provision for income taxes from continuing
operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
89.4
|
|
|
$
|
41.8
|
|
|
$
|
33.1
|
|
State
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
110.1
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
52.7
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
State
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
59.3
|
|
|
|
75.5
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
$
|
169.4
|
|
|
$
|
133.0
|
|
|
$
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
Deferred income taxes represent the tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. The components of deferred tax
liabilities and assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization
|
|
$
|
270.8
|
|
|
$
|
233.5
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
283.5
|
|
|
|
249.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workers compensation, pensions, and other benefits
|
|
|
51.6
|
|
|
|
59.4
|
|
Warranties and reserves
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
Equity items
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards and credits
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
132.8
|
|
|
|
155.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities before valuation allowance
|
|
|
150.7
|
|
|
|
94.2
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities before FIN 48
|
|
|
153.2
|
|
|
|
97.8
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities included in FIN 48 reserves
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
142.1
|
|
|
$
|
73.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, the Company had $1.8 million of
Federal consolidated net operating loss carry forwards and tax
effected $4.1 million of state loss carry forwards. The
Federal tax loss carry forwards are related to pre-acquisition
losses from acquired subsidiaries and are due to expire between
2011 and 2013. We have established a valuation allowance for
state net operating losses which may not be realizable. These
net operating losses expire between 2008 and 2024.
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on generating
sufficient taxable income in future periods. We have established
valuation allowances against tax losses and credits that we will
most likely be unable to utilize. We believe that it is more
likely than not that we will be able to generate sufficient
future taxable income to utilize the remaining deferred tax
assets.
We are currently under Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) examination for the tax years ended 1998
through 2002 and 2004 through 2005, thus our statute remains
open from the year ended March 31, 1998, forward. We expect
the 1998 through 2002 examination to be completed within the
next twelve months and expect the 2004 through 2005 examination
to be completed within the next twelve to eighteen months. This
could be affected by any adjustments that the IRS and the
Company do not agree upon, in which case the statute could
remain open for an undeterminable period. In addition, statutes
of limitations governing the right of Mexicos tax
authorities to audit the tax returns of our Mexican operations
remain open for the 2002 tax year forward. We have recently been
contacted by the Mexican taxing authority notifying us of their
intent to audit our Mexican subsidiaries for the 2002 and 2003
tax years. We expect these examinations to be completed within
the next twelve months. Our various European subsidiaries,
including the subsidiaries that were sold during 2006, are
impacted by various statutes of limitations which are generally
open from 2003 forward. An exception to this is our Romanian
operations, which have been audited through 2004. Generally,
states statutes in the United States are open from 2002
forward.
56
The provision for income taxes from continuing operations
results in effective tax rates different from the statutory
rates. The following is reconciliation between the statutory
United States federal income tax rate and the Companys
effective income tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State taxes
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Changes in tax laws and rates
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total taxes
|
|
|
36.6
|
%
|
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
|
|
37.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes for the
year ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was
$446.5 million, $328.2 million, and
$157.8 million, respectively, for United States operations,
and $16.7 million, $20.3 million, and
$18.3 million, respectively, for foreign operations. The
Company has provided United States deferred income taxes on the
un-repatriated earnings of its foreign operations. The Company
has $0.7 million of foreign tax credit carry forwards which
will expire between 2013 and 2015.
Note 13.
Employee Retirement Plans
The Company sponsors defined benefit plans and defined
contribution profit sharing plans which provide income and death
benefits for eligible employees. The annual measurement date of
the benefit obligations, fair value of plan assets and funded
status is December 31.
Actuarial
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the
annual measurement date were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation discount rate
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Compensation increase rate
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
|
|
8.75
|
%
|
|
|
8.75
|
%
|
Compensation increase rate
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is an
assumption reflecting the anticipated weighted average rate of
earnings on the portfolio over the long-term. To arrive at this
rate, we developed estimates based upon the anticipated
performance of the assets in its portfolio.
57
Components
of Net Retirement Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Expense Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
11.3
|
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
|
(18.1
|
)
|
|
|
(17.2
|
)
|
Amortization and deferral
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense
|
|
$
|
24.5
|
|
|
$
|
22.6
|
|
|
$
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations
and Funded Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligations
|
|
$
|
272.6
|
|
|
$
|
273.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected Benefit Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
$
|
320.4
|
|
|
$
|
303.4
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(24.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
316.8
|
|
|
$
|
320.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plans Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
$
|
224.6
|
|
|
$
|
204.3
|
|
Actual return on assets
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
249.6
|
|
|
$
|
224.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(67.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(95.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unfunded status of the plan of $67.2 million at
December 31, 2007 was recognized in the accompanying
balance sheet as accrued pension liability. No plan assets are
expected to be returned to us during the year ending
December 31, 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the change in the
funded status was a gain of $30.0 million
($18.7 million net of related income taxes) that was
recognized in other comprehensive income. This was primarily
comprised of an actuarial gain of $25.8 million
($16.1 million net of related income taxes). In addition,
the following amounts were recognized as a reclassification
adjustment of other comprehensive income as a result of being
recognized in net periodic pension cost for the year ended
December 31, 2007: transition asset of $0.1 million
($0.1 million net of related income taxes), prior service
cost of $0.2 million ($0.1 million net of related
income taxes), and an amortization of an actuarial loss of
$4.1 million ($2.6 million net of related income
taxes).
58
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at
December 31, 2007 were the following amounts that have not
been recognized in net periodic pension cost: unrecognized
transition asset of $0.1 million ($0.1 million net of
related income taxes), prior service cost of $1.4 million
($0.9 million net of related income taxes) and unrecognized
actuarial losses of $56.4 million ($35.0 million net
of related income taxes).
The transition asset, prior service cost and actuarial loss
included in accumulated other comprehensive loss and expected to
be recognized in net periodic pension cost for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was $0.1 million ($0.1 million
net of related income taxes), $0.2 million
($0.1 million net of related income taxes) and
$2.0 million ($1.2 million net of related income
taxes), respectively.
Plan
Assets
The pension plan weighted-average asset allocation at year end
2007 and 2006 and the range of target asset allocations are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Plan
|
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
Assets at
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Year-End
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Asset category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
55-65
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
35-45
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys pension investment strategies have been
developed as part of a comprehensive asset/liability management
process that considers the relationship between both the assets
and liabilities of the plans. These strategies consider not only
the expected risk and returns on plan assets, but also the
actuarial projections of liabilities, projected contributions,
and funded status. The equity allocation is heavily weighted
toward domestic large capitalized companies. There is also a
lesser exposure to domestic small/mid cap companies, as well as,
international equities. The fixed income allocation is equally
split between a limited duration portfolio and a core plus
portfolio that has a duration in-line with published bond
indices. This asset mix is designed to meet the longer-term
obligations of the plan as projected by actuarial studies.
The principal pension investment strategies include asset
allocation and active asset management. The range of target
asset allocations has been determined after giving consideration
to the expected returns of each asset category, the expected
performance of each asset category, the volatility of the asset
returns over time and the complementary nature of the asset mix
within the portfolio. Each asset category is managed by external
money managers with the objective of generating returns that
exceed market-based benchmarks.
Cash
Flows
Employer contributions for the year ending December 31,
2008 are expected to be $32.5 million for the defined
benefit plans compared to $16.1 million contributed during
2007. Employer contributions to the 401(k) plans and the
Supplemental Profit Sharing Plan for the year ending
December 31, 2008 are expected to be $7.0 million
compared to $6.0 million during 2007.
59
Benefit payments expected to be paid during the next ten years
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
10.8
|
|
2009
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
2010
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
2011
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
2012
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
|
104.8
|
|
Note 14.
Series B Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
In June 2003, the Company issued 600 shares of
Series B Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock. The
Series B preferred stock was classified outside the
Stockholders Equity section because there was not absolute
assurance that the number of authorized and un-issued common
shares would be adequate to redeem the Series B preferred
stock. In February 2006, the Company converted the
600 shares of Series B preferred stock into
2,671,415 shares of the Companys common stock.
Note 15.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
293.1
|
|
|
$
|
230.1
|
|
|
$
|
86.3
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in currency translation adjustment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of European operations, net of tax expense of $8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in currency translation adjustment, net of tax expense
(benefit) of $0.2, $0.0, and $(2.9)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
Change in funded status of pension liability, net of tax expense
(benefit) of $11.3, $3.5, and $(7.6)
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on derivative financial
instruments, net of tax (benefit) expense of $(6.3), $0.9, and
$0.6
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
300.7
|
|
|
$
|
231.5
|
|
|
$
|
71.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
$
|
(17.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17.5
|
)
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Funded status of pension liability
|
|
|
(35.8
|
)
|
|
|
(54.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(61.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16.
Stockholders Equity
The Company has a Stockholders Rights Plan. On
March 11, 1999, the Board of Directors of the Company
declared a dividend distribution of one right for each
outstanding share of the Companys common stock, $1.00 par
value, to stockholders of record at the close of business on
April 27, 1999. Each right entitles the registered holder
to
60
purchase from the Company one one-hundredth (1/100) of a share
of Series A Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $200.00
per one one-hundredth (1/100) of a share, subject to adjustment.
The rights are not exercisable or detachable from the common
stock until ten business days after a person or group acquires
beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Companys common
stock or if a person or group commences a tender or exchange
offer upon consummation of which that person or group would
beneficially own 15% or more of the common stock. We will
generally be entitled to redeem the rights at $0.01 per right at
any time until the first public announcement that a 15% position
has been acquired. If any person or group becomes a beneficial
owner of 15% or more of our common stock, each right not owned
by that person or related parties enables its holder to
purchase, at the rights purchase price, shares of our
common stock having a calculated value of twice the purchase
price of the right.
Note 17.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Companys 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
(Plan) authorized 2,500,000 shares of common
stock plus (i) shares covered by forfeited, expired, and
canceled options granted under prior plans; (ii) shares
tendered as full or partial payment for the purchase price of an
award or to satisfy tax withholding obligations; and
(iii) shares covered by an award settled in cash. At
December 31, 2007, a total of 2,527,088 shares were
available for issuance. The plan provides for the granting of
nonqualified and incentive stock options having maximum ten-year
terms to purchase common stock at its market value on the award
date; stock appreciation rights based on common stock fair
market values with settlement in common stock or cash;
restricted stock; restricted stock units; and performance awards
with settlement in common stock or cash on achievement of
specific business objectives. Under previous plans, nonqualified
and incentive stock options, restricted shares, and restricted
stock units were granted at their fair market values. Options
become exercisable in various percentages over periods ranging
up to five years.
Stock
Options
Effective with the adoption of SFAS 123R, expense related
to stock options issued to eligible employees under the Plan is
recognized over their vesting period on a straight line basis.
Stock options generally vest over 5 years and have
contractual terms of 10 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Terms
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,122,360
|
|
|
$
|
18.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(813,040
|
)
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(7,053
|
)
|
|
|
16.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,302,267
|
|
|
|
16.77
|
|
|
|
4.65
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
812,773
|
|
|
$
|
17.03
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
|
$
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, unrecognized compensation expense
related to stock options was $1.9 million. At
December 31, 2007, for unrecognized compensation expense
related to stock options, the weighted average recognition
period was 1.3 years. The intrinsic value of options
exercised totaled approximately $19.7 million,
$32.9 million, and $21.1 million during fiscal years
2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
Restricted
Stock
Restricted share awards consist of restricted stock and
restricted stock units. Expense related to restricted stock and
restricted stock units issued to eligible employees under the
Plan is recognized ratably over the vesting period or to the
date on which retirement eligibility is achieved, if shorter.
Restricted stock and restricted stock units issued to eligible
employees under our long-term incentive plans generally vest
one-third per year on the first, third, and fifth anniversary,
one-third per year on the fourth, sixth, and eighth anniversary
or one-hundred percent on the fifth
61
anniversary of the date of grant. Certain awards vest
one-hundred percent upon the employees retirement from the
Company or when the employees age plus years of vested
service equal 80. Restricted stock units issued to non-employee
directors under the Plan vest on the grant date or on the first
business day immediately preceding the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average Fair
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Value per
|
|
|
|
Share Awards
|
|
|
Award
|
|
|
Restricted share awards outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
2,177,116
|
|
|
$
|
22.62
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
595,091
|
|
|
|
43.55
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
(311,951
|
)
|
|
|
24.06
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(40,643
|
)
|
|
|
26.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted share awards outstanding at December 31,
2007
|
|
|
2,419,613
|
|
|
$
|
27.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, unrecognized compensation expense
related to restricted share awards totaled approximately
$45.7 million which will be recognized over a weighted
average period of 5.3 years. The total fair value of shares
vested during fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005 was
$13.5 million, $7.2 million, and $2.8 million,
respectively.
Note 18.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Except when the effect would be
anti-dilutive, the calculation of diluted net income per share
includes the impact of shares that could be issued under
outstanding stock options. The number of anti-dilutive options
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were
0.1 million, 0.0 million and 0.9 million,
respectively.
The computation of basic and diluted income (loss) applicable to
common shareholders follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. Shares
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations basic
|
|
$
|
293.8
|
|
|
|
78.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations diluted
|
|
$
|
293.8
|
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
basic
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
78.7
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. Shares
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations basic
|
|
$
|
215.5
|
|
|
|
76.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations diluted
|
|
$
|
215.5
|
|
|
|
79.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
basic
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
76.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
diluted
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
79.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. Shares
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations basic
|
|
$
|
110.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: dividends on Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations applicable to common
shareholders basic
|
|
$
|
107.3
|
|
|
|
71.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations applicable to common
shareholders diluted
|
|
$
|
110.5
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes basic
|
|
$
|
(24.2
|
)
|
|
|
71.0
|
|
|
$
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
diluted
|
|
$
|
(24.2
|
)
|
|
|
76.7
|
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 19.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Barge
Litigation
The Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Trinity Marine
Products, Inc. (TMP), and certain material suppliers
and others, are co-defendants in a
class-action
lawsuit filed in April 2003 entitled Waxler Transportation
Company, Inc. v. Trinity Marine Products, Inc., et al.
pending in Suit
No. 49-741,
Division B in the 25th Judicial District Court in
and for the Parish of Plaquemines, Louisiana (the Waxler
Case). The plaintiff and class representative owned four
tank barges on which allegedly defective coatings were applied.
To avoid a continuing commitment of management and executive
time as well as the legal, expert, and transactional costs
associated with litigating the claims alleged, the Company and
TMP reached a preliminary settlement agreement in the Waxler
Case that was preliminarily approved by the court. Pursuant to
that agreement, the court certified the class for settlement
63
purposes on August 20, 2007. Thereafter, notice of the
approved preliminary settlement agreement was provided to the
class.
The preliminary settlement agreement requires each class member
whose individual claims will be settled via the class settlement
to elect one of three, mutually exclusive settlement options.
Class members who elected not to settle their individual claims
via the class settlement were entitled to opt-out of the class
and pursue such claims independently of the class. The deadline
for class members to opt-out of the class or object to the
settlement was in October 2007, and as of the date of this
filing, there were no opt-outs or objections filed. At the
court-scheduled fairness hearing held November 29, 2007, no
objections by class members were proffered and the court
approved the preliminary settlement agreement. The courts
judgment became final on February 9, 2008 at which time no
appeals or other challenges to the preliminary settlement had
been filed. The terms of the settlement are to be implemented
following dismissal filings for related matters. As of the date
of this filing, the Court Appointed Disbursing Agent
(CADA) had received claims from approximately 95
claimants with respect to approximately 2,114 barges. The
Company is in the process of verifying each of these claims.
Recorded in our Inland Barge Group operating profit results is
an additional $15.0 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007, bringing the total for this case to
$18.0 million to cover our probable and estimable
liabilities assuming the approved settlement is implemented.
Other
Litigation
Transit Mix is named as a defendant in a case involving the
death of an employee of an independent contractor who was
working at a Transit Mix facility. Following a jury verdict in
favor of the plaintiff, the presiding judge entered a final
judgment that, together with fees, costs, and judgment interest,
totaled $49.3 million. This case was appealed by Transit
Mix and its insurers. In October 2006, the original trial court
judgment was reversed and a take-nothing judgment was rendered
by the Eleventh Court of Appeals, State of Texas. Plaintiffs
filed a motion for rehearing in such court, which was denied. On
March 22, 2007, Plaintiffs filed their Petition for Review
with the Texas Supreme Court. Transit Mix filed its Response to
Plaintiffs Petition for Review on July 13, 2007. In
September 2007, the Texas Supreme Court requested briefing by
the parties on the underlying merits of the case. The Court has
not yet granted the Plaintiffs Petition for Review.
We are also involved in other claims and lawsuits incidental to
our business. Based on information currently available, it is
managements opinion that the ultimate outcome of all
current litigation and other claims, including settlements, in
the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on the
Companys overall financial condition for purposes of
financial reporting. However, resolution of certain claims or
lawsuits by settlement or otherwise could have a significant
impact on the operating results of the reporting period in which
such resolution occurs.
We are subject to federal, state, local, and foreign laws and
regulations relating to the environment and the workplace. We
believe that we are currently in substantial compliance with
such laws and regulations.
We are involved in various proceedings relating to environmental
matters. We have reserved $11.2 million to cover our
probable and estimable liabilities with respect to the
investigations, assessments, and remedial responses to such
matters, taking into account currently available information and
our contractual rights to indemnification and recourse to third
parties. However, estimates of future remedial response costs
are inherently imprecise. Accordingly, there can be no assurance
that we will not become involved in future environmental
litigation or other proceedings or, if we are found to be
responsible or liable in any such litigation or proceeding, that
such costs would not be material to the Company.
Other
Commitments
Non-cancelable purchase obligations, primarily for steel and
railcar specialty components, are $426.6 million in 2008
and $11.4 million in 2009.
|
|
Note 20.
|
Financial
Statements for Guarantors of the Senior Notes
|
The Companys senior debt is fully and unconditionally and
jointly and severally guaranteed by certain of Trinitys
wholly owned subsidiaries: Transit Mix Concrete &
Materials Company, Trinity Industries Leasing
64
Company, Trinity Marine Products, Inc., Trinity Rail Group, LLC,
Trinity North American Freight Car, Inc., Trinity Tank Car,
Inc., and Trinity Parts & Components, LLC. No other
subsidiaries guarantee the senior debt. As of December 31,
2007, assets held by the non-guarantor subsidiaries include
$129.1 million of restricted assets that are not available
for distribution to the Trinity Industries, Inc.
(Parent), $811.1 million of assets securing
certain debt and $109.8 million of assets securing certain
lease obligations held by the non-guarantor subsidiaries, and
$251.3 million of assets located in foreign locations.
The following financial information presents condensed
consolidated balance sheets, statements of income and statements
of cash flows for Trinity Industries, Inc., its guarantor
subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries. The information is
presented on the basis of Trinity Industries, Inc. accounting
for its ownership of its wholly owned subsidiaries using the
equity method of accounting. Inter-company transactions of goods
and services between the guarantor and non-guarantor
subsidiaries are presented as intercompany receivable/(payable),
net. The following represents the supplemental consolidated
condensed financial information of Trinity Industries, Inc., the
issuer of the Senior Notes, and its guarantor and non-guarantor
subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2007, and 2006, and for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Statement
of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Combined Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
57.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,642.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,709.4
|
|
|
$
|
(576.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,832.8
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
194.6
|
|
|
|
2,082.9
|
|
|
|
1,390.5
|
|
|
|
(576.9
|
)
|
|
|
3,091.1
|
|
Selling, engineering, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
115.1
|
|
|
|
77.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230.7
|
|
|
|
2,198.0
|
|
|
|
1,468.2
|
|
|
|
(576.9
|
)
|
|
|
3,320.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
(173.1
|
)
|
|
|
444.7
|
|
|
|
241.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512.8
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
(417.3
|
)
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
|
|
378.1
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
244.2
|
|
|
|
430.9
|
|
|
|
166.2
|
|
|
|
(378.1
|
)
|
|
|
463.2
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(27.2
|
)
|
|
|
72.6
|
|
|
|
64.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.1
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
|
|
83.6
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48.9
|
)
|
|
|
156.2
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
293.1
|
|
|
|
274.7
|
|
|
|
104.1
|
|
|
|
(378.1
|
)
|
|
|
293.8
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of benefit for income
taxes of $0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
293.1
|
|
|
$
|
274.7
|
|
|
$
|
103.4
|
|
|
$
|
(378.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
293.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
Statement
of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Combined Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
487.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,009.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,149.0
|
|
|
$
|
(426.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,218.9
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
491.1
|
|
|
|
1,666.8
|
|
|
|
896.7
|
|
|
|
(426.4
|
)
|
|
|
2,628.2
|
|
Selling, engineering, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
71.9
|
|
|
|
97.2
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563.0
|
|
|
|
1,764.0
|
|
|
|
935.7
|
|
|
|
(426.4
|
)
|
|
|
2,836.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
(75.7
|
)
|
|
|
245.0
|
|
|
|
213.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382.6
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
(271.0
|
)
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
201.7
|
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
195.3
|
|
|
|
186.8
|
|
|
|
168.1
|
|
|
|
(201.7
|
)
|
|
|
348.5
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(22.1
|
)
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
64.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.4
|
)
|
|
|
97.9
|
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
209.7
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
|
|
|
118.6
|
|
|
|
(201.7
|
)
|
|
|
215.5
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of provision for
income taxes of $12.2
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of benefit for income
taxes of $1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
230.1
|
|
|
$
|
88.9
|
|
|
$
|
112.8
|
|
|
$
|
(201.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
230.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Combined Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
465.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,631.7
|
|
|
$
|
776.7
|
|
|
$
|
(164.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,709.7
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
460.5
|
|
|
|
1,404.5
|
|
|
|
623.8
|
|
|
|
(164.4
|
)
|
|
|
2,324.4
|
|
Selling, engineering, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
|
|
85.1
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527.9
|
|
|
|
1,489.6
|
|
|
|
652.5
|
|
|
|
(164.4
|
)
|
|
|
2,505.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
(62.2
|
)
|
|
|
142.1
|
|
|
|
124.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204.1
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
(121.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
|
164.9
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
148.4
|
|
|
|
133.6
|
|
|
|
(164.9
|
)
|
|
|
176.1
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(52.2
|
)
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.3
|
)
|
|
|
54.4
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
86.3
|
|
|
|
94.0
|
|
|
|
95.1
|
|
|
|
(164.9
|
)
|
|
|
110.5
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of benefit for income
taxes of $8.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
86.3
|
|
|
$
|
94.0
|
|
|
$
|
70.9
|
|
|
$
|
(164.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
86.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
Balance
Sheet
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Combined Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
238.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
50.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
289.6
|
|
Receivables, net of allowance
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
156.6
|
|
|
|
134.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296.5
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
412.1
|
|
|
|
169.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586.7
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
807.1
|
|
|
|
1,240.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,069.8
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries/intercompany receivable
(payable), net
|
|
|
2,271.3
|
|
|
|
(522.4
|
)
|
|
|
314.2
|
|
|
|
(2,063.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other assets
|
|
|
227.4
|
|
|
|
440.9
|
|
|
|
264.2
|
|
|
|
(131.9
|
)
|
|
|
800.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,770.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,295.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,172.9
|
|
|
$
|
(2,195.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,043.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
307.4
|
|
|
$
|
174.2
|
|
|
$
|
202.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
684.3
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
651.7
|
|
|
|
78.5
|
|
|
|
644.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,374.2
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
52.2
|
|
|
|
274.8
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
(131.9
|
)
|
|
|
199.6
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,726.7
|
|
|
|
763.6
|
|
|
|
1,299.5
|
|
|
|
(2,063.1
|
)
|
|
|
1,726.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,770.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,295.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,172.9
|
|
|
$
|
(2,195.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,043.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Combined Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
283.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
28.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
311.5
|
|
Receivables, net of allowance
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
124.0
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252.5
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
|
292.7
|
|
|
|
168.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528.9
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
687.7
|
|
|
|
856.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,590.3
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries/intercompany receivable (payable),
net
|
|
|
1,674.4
|
|
|
|
(432.0
|
)
|
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
|
(1,351.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other assets
|
|
|
188.1
|
|
|
|
432.0
|
|
|
|
221.7
|
|
|
|
(99.4
|
)
|
|
|
742.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,318.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,104.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,453.7
|
|
|
$
|
(1,450.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,425.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
228.2
|
|
|
$
|
274.7
|
|
|
$
|
152.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
655.8
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
651.5
|
|
|
|
120.9
|
|
|
|
426.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198.9
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
197.3
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
(99.4
|
)
|
|
|
124.5
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,403.5
|
|
|
|
508.2
|
|
|
|
843.3
|
|
|
|
(1,351.5
|
)
|
|
|
1,403.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,318.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,104.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,453.7
|
|
|
$
|
(1,450.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,425.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
Statement
of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Combined Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
293.1
|
|
|
$
|
274.7
|
|
|
$
|
103.4
|
|
|
$
|
(378.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
293.1
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
(required) by continuing operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118.9
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
|
|
83.6
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.3
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of property, plant, equipment, and
other assets
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
Net transfers with subsidiaries
|
|
|
(584.9
|
)
|
|
|
71.1
|
|
|
|
135.7
|
|
|
|
378.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
(69.8
|
)
|
|
|
(16.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.7
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables
|
|
|
52.8
|
|
|
|
(41.4
|
)
|
|
|
(57.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.7
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in inventories
|
|
|
62.9
|
|
|
|
(120.5
|
)
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50.9
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
(37.1
|
)
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53.2
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
123.4
|
|
|
|
(77.2
|
)
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87.2
|
|
Increase (decrease) increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (required) provided by operating
activities continuing operations
|
|
|
(34.6
|
)
|
|
|
112.7
|
|
|
|
266.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344.6
|
|
Net cash required by operating activities
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (required) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(34.6
|
)
|
|
|
112.7
|
|
|
|
266.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of railcars from our leased fleet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646.0
|
|
|
|
101.5
|
|
|
|
(388.2
|
)
|
|
|
359.3
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant, equipment, and
other assets
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
Capital expenditures lease subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(702.3
|
)
|
|
|
(391.3
|
)
|
|
|
388.2
|
|
|
|
(705.4
|
)
|
Capital expenditures other
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
(54.3
|
)
|
|
|
(127.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188.7
|
)
|
Payment for purchase of acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(48.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash required by investing activities
continuing operations
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(69.8
|
)
|
|
|
(461.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(534.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash required by investing activities
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(69.8
|
)
|
|
|
(461.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(534.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Payments to retire debt
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(44.9
|
)
|
|
|
(83.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129.5
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
301.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304.8
|
|
Stock repurchases
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
Dividends paid to common shareholders
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (required) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
(42.4
|
)
|
|
|
217.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(45.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.9
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
283.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
238.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
50.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
289.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
Statement
of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Combined Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
230.1
|
|
|
$
|
88.9
|
|
|
$
|
112.8
|
|
|
$
|
(201.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
230.1
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
(required) by continuing operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(20.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
Income tax benefit from employee stock options exercised
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.5
|
|
Gain on disposition of property, plant, equipment and other
assets
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
Net transfers with subsidiaries
|
|
|
(415.7
|
)
|
|
|
220.8
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
201.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.6
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33.8
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in inventories
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
(57.5
|
)
|
|
|
(56.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124.0
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(34.1
|
)
|
|
|
(44.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78.7
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(50.1
|
)
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
(23.4
|
)
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (required) provided by operating activities
continuing operations
|
|
|
(255.0
|
)
|
|
|
311.4
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.4
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (required) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(255.0
|
)
|
|
|
311.4
|
|
|
|
74.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of railcars for our leased fleet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277.5
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
(200.8
|
)
|
|
|
88.8
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant, equipment, and
other assets
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
Capital expenditures lease subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(540.1
|
)
|
|
|
(204.3
|
)
|
|
|
200.8
|
|
|
|
(543.6
|
)
|
Capital expenditures other
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
|
|
(50.2
|
)
|
|
|
(51.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117.5
|
)
|
Payments for purchase of acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash required by investing activities continuing
operations
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
|
|
(301.2
|
)
|
|
|
(241.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(555.8
|
)
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
discontinued operations
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (required) by investing activities
|
|
|
69.6
|
|
|
|
(301.2
|
)
|
|
|
(241.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(472.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Payments to retire debt
|
|
|
(103.6
|
)
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
(294.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(410.2
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
453.6
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
464.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920.1
|
|
Dividends paid to common shareholders
|
|
|
(16.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.3
|
)
|
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (required) by financing activities
|
|
|
357.7
|
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
170.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
172.3
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175.5
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
110.8
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
283.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
28.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
311.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
Statement
of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Combined Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
86.3
|
|
|
$
|
94.0
|
|
|
$
|
70.9
|
|
|
$
|
(164.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
86.3
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
(required) by continuing operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.2
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Income tax benefit from employee stock options exercised
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of property, plant, equipment and
other assets
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
Net transfers with subsidiaries
|
|
|
(139.7
|
)
|
|
|
(45.9
|
)
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
164.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.1
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
(17.2
|
)
|
|
|
(57.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67.7
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42.1
|
)
|
|
|
(23.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.2
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.0
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
|
(39.1
|
)
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (required) provided by operating activities
continuing
|
|
|
(36.7
|
)
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
79.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125.2
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (required) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(36.7
|
)
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
119.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of railcars from our leased fleet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(291.7
|
)
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant, equipment, and other
assets
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Capital expenditures lease subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345.8
|
)
|
|
|
(291.7
|
)
|
|
|
291.7
|
|
|
|
(345.8
|
)
|
Capital expenditures other
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
(28.9
|
)
|
|
|
(51.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided required by investing activities
continuing operations
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
(44.0
|
)
|
|
|
(342.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(389.3
|
)
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash required by investing activities
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
(44.0
|
)
|
|
|
(341.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(388.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
Payments to retire debt
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(40.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.2
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
218.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223.6
|
|
Dividends paid to common shareholders
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (required) by financing activities
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
(38.8
|
)
|
|
|
212.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(27.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.6
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
138.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
110.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Note 21.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in millions except per share data)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
828.5
|
|
|
$
|
892.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,008.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,103.3
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
108.7
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
146.9
|
|
|
|
146.1
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
59.1
|
|
|
|
69.0
|
|
|
|
87.2
|
|
|
|
78.5
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of provision (benefit)
for income taxes of $, $(0.1), $(0.1), and $
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
59.1
|
|
|
|
68.7
|
|
|
|
87.0
|
|
|
|
78.3
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions except per share data)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
724.7
|
|
|
$
|
849.1
|
|
|
$
|
810.1
|
|
|
$
|
835.0
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
108.3
|
|
|
|
100.7
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
|
Gain (loss) on sales of discontinued operations, net of
provision (benefit) for income taxes of $, $13.8, $(0.5),
and $(1.1)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of provision (benefit)
for income taxes of $(1.5), $(1.2), $1.6, and $(0.6)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
85.8
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
|
None
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures.
The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure
that it is able to collect the information it is required to
disclose in the reports it files with the SEC, and to process,
summarize, and disclose this information within the time periods
specified in the rules of the SEC. The Companys Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officers are responsible for
establishing and maintaining these procedures and, as required
by the rules of the SEC, evaluating their effectiveness. Based
on their evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures which took place as of the end of the period
covered by this report, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial
Officers believe that these procedures are effective to ensure
that the Company is able to collect, process, and disclose the
information it is required to disclose in the reports it files
with the SEC within the required time periods.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can
provide only reasonable assurance, as opposed to absolute
assurance, of achieving their internal control objectives.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control Integrated Framework. Based on our
assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2007, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting is
effective based on those criteria.
The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2007, has been audited by
Ernst & Young, LLP, the independent registered public
accounting firm who also audited the Companys consolidated
financial statements. Ernst & Youngs attestation
report on effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting is included herein.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
72
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
|
Information regarding the directors of the Company is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the
caption Election of Directors in the Companys
Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
2008 Proxy Statement). Information relating to the
executive officers of the Company is set forth in Part I of
this report under the caption Executive Officers of the
Company. Information relating to the Board of
Directors determinations concerning whether at least one
of the members of the Audit Committee is an audit
committee financial expert as that term is defined under
Item 407 (d)(5) of
Regulation S-K
is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under
the caption Corporate Governance in the
Companys 2008 Proxy Statement. Information regarding the
Companys Audit Committee is incorporated by reference to
the information set forth under the caption Corporate
Governance in the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement.
Information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and an amended filing of a
Form 4 is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth under the caption Additional Information
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance in the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement.
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
that applies to all of its directors, officers, and employees.
The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is on the Companys
website at www.trin.net under the caption Investor
Relations/ Governance. The Company intends to post any
amendments or waivers for its Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics to the Companys website at www.trin.net.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
Information regarding compensation of executive officers and
directors is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth under the caption Executive Compensation in
the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement. Information concerning
compensation committee interlocks and insider participation is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the
caption Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation in the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement.
Information about the compensation committee report is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the
caption Compensation Committee Report in the
Companys 2008 Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
|
Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial
owners and management is incorporated herein by reference from
the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement, under the caption
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management.
73
The following table sets forth information about Trinity common
stock that may be issued under all of Trinitys existing
equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2007.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
to be Issued
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance under
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
1,302,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
|
|
55,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,357,558
|
|
|
$
|
16.09
|
(1)
|
|
|
2,527,088
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,357,558
|
|
|
$
|
16.09
|
|
|
|
2,527,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 55,291 shares of common stock issuable upon the
vesting and conversion of restricted stock units. The restricted
stock units do not have an exercise price. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes information regarding the Trinity Deferred Plan for
Director Fees. This plan permits the deferral of the payment of
the annual retainer fee and board and committee meeting fees. At
the election of the participant, the deferred fees may be
converted into phantom stock units with a fair market value
equal to the value of the fees deferred, and such phantom stock
units are credited to the directors account (along with
the amount of any dividends or stock distributions). At the time
a participant ceases to be a director, cash will be distributed
to the participant. At December 31, 2007, 40,120 phantom
stock units were credited to the accounts of participants. Also
excludes information regarding the Trinity Industries
Supplemental Profit Sharing Plan (Supplemental Plan)
for certain of its highly compensated employees. Information
about the Supplemental Plan is incorporated herein by reference
from the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement, under the caption
Executive Compensation Post-Employment
Benefits. At December 31, 2007, 52,225 stock units
were credited to the accounts of participants under the
Supplemental Plan. |
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
|
Information regarding certain relationships and related person
transactions is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth under the captions Compensation Committee Interlocks
and Insider Participation and Transactions with
Related Persons in the Companys 2008 Proxy
Statement. Information regarding the independence of directors
is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under
the captions Independence of Directors and
Independence of Former Directors in the
Companys 2008 Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
|
Information regarding principal accountant fees and services is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the
captions Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm for Fiscal years 2007 and 2006 in the Companys
2008 Proxy Statement.
74
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) (1) Financial Statements.
See Item 8.
(2) Financial Statement Schedule.
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
II Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
(3) Exhibits.
See Index to Exhibits for a listing of Exhibits which are filed
herewith or incorporated herein by reference to the location
indicated.
75
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement
(Form S-8,
No. 2-64813),
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement
(Form S-8,
No. 33-10937),
Registration Statement
(Form S-8,
No. 33-35514),
Registration Statement
(Form S-8,
No. 33-73026),
Registration Statement
(Form S-8,
No. 333-77735),
Registration Statement
(Form S-8,
No. 333-91067),
Registration Statement
(Form S-8,
No. 333-85588),
Registration Statement
(Form S-8,
No. 333-85590),
Registration Statement
(Form S-8,
No. 333-114854),
Registration Statement
(Form S-8,
No. 333-115376),
and Registration Statement
(Form S-3,
No. 333-134596)
of Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries and in the related
Prospectuses of our reports dated February 20, 2008 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of Trinity
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
/s/ Ernst &
Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 20, 2008
76
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Trinity Industries, Inc.
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Trinity
Industries, Inc. as of December 31, 2007, and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 and
have issued our report thereon dated February 20, 2008. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule of Trinity
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries listed in Item 15. This
schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ Ernst &
Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 20, 2008
77
SCHEDULE II
Trinity
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Allowance For Doubtful Accounts
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
at End of
|
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Off
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused
this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Registrant
|
|
By |
/s/ William
A. McWhirter II
|
William A. McWhirter II
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Directors:
John L. Adams
Director
Dated: February 21, 2008
Rhys J. Best
Director
Dated: February 21, 2008
David W. Biegler
Director
Dated: February 21, 2008
Leldon E. Echols
Director
Dated: February 21, 2008
Ronald J. Gafford
Director
Dated: February 21, 2008
Ronald W. Haddock
Director
Dated: February 21, 2008
Jess T. Hay
Director
Dated: February 21, 2008
Adrián Lajous
Director
Dated: February 21, 2008
Diana S. Natalicio
Director
Dated: February 21, 2008
Principal
Executive Officer:
Timothy R. Wallace
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer,and Director
Dated: February 21, 2008
Principal
Financial Officer:
/s/ William
A. McWhirter II
William A. McWhirter II
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dated: February 21, 2008
Principal
Accounting Officer:
Charles Michel
Vice President, Controller, and Chief Accounting Officer
Dated: February 21, 2008
Trinity
Industries, Inc.
Index to
Exhibits
(Item 15(b))
|
|
|
|
|
NO.
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
(3
|
.1)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Trinity Industries, Inc., as
amended May 23, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-Q
filed August 2, 2007).
|
|
(3
|
.2)
|
|
By-Laws of Trinity Industries, Inc., as amended
December 13, 2007 (filed herewith).
|
|
(3
|
.3)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Transit Mix Concrete &
Materials Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.3 of Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(3
|
.4)
|
|
By-Laws of Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of Registration
Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(3
|
.5)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Trinity Industries Leasing
Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 of
Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(3
|
.6)
|
|
By-Laws of Trinity Industries Leasing Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.6 of Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(3
|
.7)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Trinity Marine Products, Inc.,
as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit of Registration
Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(3
|
.8)
|
|
By-Laws of Trinity Marine Products, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.8 of Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(3
|
.9)
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Trinity Rail Group, LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 of Registration
Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(3
|
.10)
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Trinity Rail Group, LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 of Registration
Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(3
|
.11)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Trinity North American Freight
Car, Inc., as amended (formerly Thrall Trinity Freight Car, Inc.
and Trinity North American Rail Car, Inc.) (filed herewith).
|
|
(3
|
.12)
|
|
By-Laws of Trinity North American Freight Car, Inc. (formerly
Thrall Trinity Freight Car, Inc. and Trinity North American Rail
Car, Inc.) (filed herewith).
|
|
(3
|
.13)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Trinity Tank Car, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13 of Registration
Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(3
|
.14)
|
|
By-Laws of Trinity Tank Car, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.14 of Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(3
|
.15)
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Trinity Parts &
Components, LLC (formerly Trinity Rail Components &
Repair, Inc. and Trinity Parts & Components, Inc.)
(filed herewith).
|
|
(3
|
.16)
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Trinity Parts &
Components, LLC. (filed herewith).
|
|
(4
|
.01)
|
|
Indenture, dated June 7, 2006, between Trinity Industries,
Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee
(including the Form of
37/8% Convertible
Subordinated Note due 2036 as an exhibit thereto) (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 4.01 to our
Form 8-K
filed June 7, 2006).
|
|
(4
|
.01.1)
|
|
Officers Certificate of Trinity Industries, Inc. pursuant
to the Indenture dated June 7, 2006, relating to the
Companys
37/8% Convertible
Subordinated Notes due 2036 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.01.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006).
|
|
(4
|
.1)
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Trinity Industries, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Registration
Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(4
|
.2)
|
|
Rights Agreement dated March 11, 1999 (incorporated by
reference to our
Form 8-A
filed April 2, 1999).
|
|
(4
|
.2.1)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Rights Agreement dated as of
August 12, 2001, amending the Rights Agreement dated as of
March 11, 1999 by and between Trinity Industries, Inc. and
the Bank of New York, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2 to our
Form 8-A/A
filed August 22, 2001).
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO.
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
(4
|
.2.2)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Rights Agreement dated as of
October 26, 2001, amending the Rights Agreement dated as of
March 11, 1999 by and between Trinity Industries, Inc. and
the Bank of New York, as Rights Agent, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 to the Rights Agreement, dated August 13, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to our
Form 8-A/A
filed October 31, 2001).
|
|
(4
|
.2.3)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Rights Agreement dated as of
August 28, 2003, amending the Rights Agreement dated as of
March 11, 1999 by and between Trinity Industries and the
Bank of New York, as Rights Agent, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 to the Rights Agreement, dated August 13, 2001
and Amendment No. 2 to the Rights Agreement dated
October 26, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4 to our
Form 8-A/A
filed May 19, 2005).
|
|
(4
|
.2.4)
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Rights Agreement dated as of
May 19, 2005, amending the Rights Agreement dated as of
March 11, 1999 by and between Trinity Industries and the
Bank of New York, as Rights Agent, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 to the Rights Agreement, dated August 13, 2001,
Amendment No. 2 to the Rights Agreement dated
October 26, 2001 and Amendment No. 3 to the Rights
Agreement dated as of August 28, 2003 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 5 to our
Form 8-A/A
filed May 19, 2005).
|
|
(4
|
.2.5)
|
|
Agreement of Substitution and Amendment of Common
Shares Rights Agreement dated March 6, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2.5 to our
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006).
|
|
(4
|
.2.6)
|
|
Certificate of Adjustment to the Rights Agreement dated
March 11, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2.6 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006).
|
|
(4
|
.4)
|
|
Pass Through Trust Agreement dated as of February 15,
2002 among Trinity Industries Leasing Company, Trinity
Industries, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee
(filed herewith).
|
|
(4
|
.4.1)
|
|
Trust Indenture and Security Agreement dated as of
February 15, 2002 among Trinity Industries Leasing Company,
Trinity Industries, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee
(filed herewith).
|
|
(4
|
.4.2)
|
|
Trust Indenture and Security Agreement dated as of
February 15, 2002 among Trinity Industries Leasing Company,
Trinity Industries, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee
(filed herewith).
|
|
(4
|
.4.3)
|
|
Trust Indenture and Security Agreement dated as of
February 15, 2002 among Trinity Industries Leasing Company,
Trinity Industries, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee
(filed herewith).
|
|
(4
|
.6)
|
|
Indenture dated as of March 10, 2004 by and between Trinity
Industries, Inc., certain subsidiary guarantors party thereto
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of Registration
Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(4
|
.7)
|
|
Form of
61/2% Senior
Note due 2014 of Trinity industries, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
(10
|
.1.1)
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Executive Severance Agreement,
dated November 7, 2000, entered into between Trinity
Industries, Inc. and Chief Executive Officer, each of the four
most highly paid executive officers other than the Chief
Executive Officer who were serving as executive officers at the
end of the last completed fiscal year and other executive
officers. (filed herewith).*
|
|
(10
|
.1.2)
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Executive Severance Agreement dated
November 7, 2000, entered into between Trinity Industries,
Inc. and certain executive officers and certain other subsidiary
and divisional officers of Trinity Industries, Inc. (filed
herewith).*
|
|
(10
|
.2)
|
|
Trinity Industries, Inc. Directors Retirement Plan, as
amended September 10, 1998 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).*
|
|
(10
|
.2.1)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Trinity Industries, Inc.
Directors Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2.1 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005).*
|
|
(10
|
.2.2)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Trinity Industries, Inc.
Directors Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to
our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.3)
|
|
1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
to Registration Statement
No. 33-73026
filed December 15, 1993).*
|
|
(10
|
.3.1)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.3.2)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO.
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
(10
|
.3.3)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.3.4)
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.3.5)
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.4)
|
|
Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Trinity Industries, Inc.
and Certain Affiliates as restated effective January 1,
2005 (incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.5)
|
|
Supplemental Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Trinity
Industries, Inc. and Certain Affiliates as restated effective
January 1, 2005 (filed herewith).*
|
|
(10
|
.6)
|
|
Trinity Industries, Inc. Supplemental Profit Sharing and
Deferred Director Fee Trust dated March 31, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Registration
Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).*
|
|
(10
|
.6.1)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Trinity Industries, Inc.
Supplemental Profit Sharing and Deferred Director Fee Trust
dated December 27, 2000 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7.1 of Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).*
|
|
(10
|
.7)
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Plan dated April 1, 1995, as
amended by Amendment No. 1 dated September 14, 1995
and Amendment No. 2 dated May 6, 1997 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).*
|
|
(10
|
.7.1)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 effective April 1, 1999 to the
Supplemental Retirement Plan of Trinity Industries, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004).*
|
|
(10
|
.7.2)
|
|
Amendment No. 4 effective January 1, 2004 to the
Supplemental Retirement Plan of Trinity Industries, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004).*
|
|
(10
|
.8)
|
|
Trinity Industries, Inc. Deferred Plan for Director Fees, as
amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of
Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).*
|
|
(10
|
.8.1)
|
|
Amendment to Trinity Industries, Inc. Deferred Plan for Director
Fees dated December 7, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.8.2)
|
|
Trinity Industries, Inc. 2005 Deferred Plan for Director Fees
(incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.9)
|
|
Deferred Compensation Trust of Trinity Industries, Inc. and
Certain Affiliates effective January 1, 2002 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of Registration Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).*
|
|
(10
|
.10)
|
|
Trinity Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Registration Statement
No. 333-77735
filed May 4, 1999).*
|
|
(10
|
.10.1)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Trinity Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock
Option Plan and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12.1 to our
Form 10-K
filed March 20, 2002).*
|
|
(10
|
.10.2)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Trinity Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to 10.12.2
to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001).*
|
|
(10
|
.10.3)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Trinity Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.10.4)
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Trinity Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.11)
|
|
Trinity Industries, Inc. 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the
Form S-8
Registration Statement filed by Trinity Industries, Inc. on
May 11, 2004).*
|
|
(10
|
.11.1)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Non-Qualified
Option Agreement with Non-Qualified Stock Option Terms and
Conditions as of September 8, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 9, 2005).*
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO.
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
(10
|
.11.2)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Incentive Stock
Option Agreement with the Incentive Stock Option Terms and
Conditions as of September 8, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 9, 2005).*
|
|
(10
|
.11.2.1)
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Terms and Conditions as of
December 6, 2005 (incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.11.3)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (filed herewith).*
|
|
(10
|
.11.4)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors (incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 9, 2005).*
|
|
(10
|
.11.5)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors (filed herewith).*
|
|
(10
|
.11.6)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Trinity Industries, Inc. 2004 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 2, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.12)
|
|
Supplemental Retirement and Director Retirement Trust of Trinity
Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004).*
|
|
(10
|
.13)
|
|
Form of 2008 Deferred Compensation Plan and Agreement as amended
and restated entered into between Trinity Industries, Inc. and
certain officers of Trinity Industries, Inc. or its subsidiaries
(filed herewith).*
|
|
(10
|
.14)
|
|
Trinity Industries, Inc. Short-Term Management Incentive Plan
(filed herewith).*
|
|
(10
|
.15)
|
|
Equipment Lease Agreement (TRL 1
2001-1A)
dated as of May 17, 2001 between TRLI-1A Railcar Statutory
Trust, lesser, and Trinity Rail Leasing I L.P., lessee (filed
herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.15.1)
|
|
Participation Agreement (TRL 1
2001-1A)
dated as of May 17, 2001 among Trinity Rail Leasing I L.P.,
lessee, et. al. (filed herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.15.2)
|
|
Equipment Lease Agreement (TRL 1
2001-1B)
dated as of July 12, 2001 between TRL 1
2001-1B
Railcar Statutory Trust, lessor, and Trinity Rail Leasing I
L.P., lessee (filed herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.15.3)
|
|
Participation Agreement (TRL 1
2001-1B)
dated as of May 17, 2001 among Trinity Rail Leasing I L.P.,
lessee, et. al. (filed herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.15.4)
|
|
Equipment Lease Agreement (TRL 1
2001-1C)
dated as if December 28, 2001 between TRL 1
2001-1C
Railcar Statutory Trust, lessor, and Trinity Rail Leasing 1
L.P., lessee (filed herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.15.5)
|
|
Participation Agreement (TRL 1
2001-1C)
dated as of December 28, 2001 among Trinity Rail Leasing 1
L.P., lessee, et. al. (filed herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.16)
|
|
Equipment Lease Agreement (TRL III
2003-1A)
dated as of November 12, 2003 between TRL III-1A Railcar
Statutory Trust, lessor, and Trinity Rail Leasing III L.P.,
lessee (filed herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.16.1)
|
|
Participation Agreement (TRL III
2003-1A)
dated as of November 12, 2003 between TRL III-1A among
Trinity Rail Leasing III L.P., lessee, et. al. (filed
herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.16.2)
|
|
Equipment Lease Agreement (TRL III
2003-1B)
dated as of November 12, 2003 between TRL III-1B Railcar
Statutory Trust, lessor, and Trinity Rail Leasing III L.P.,
lessee, (filed herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.16.3)
|
|
Participation Agreement (TRL III
2003-1B)
dated as of November 12, 2003 between TRL III-1B among
Trinity Rail Leasing III L.P., lessee, et. al. (filed
herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.16.4)
|
|
Equipment Lease Agreement (TRL III
2003-1C)
dated as of November 12, 2003 between TRL III-1C Railcar
Statutory Trust, lessor, and Trinity Rail Leasing III L.P.,
lessee (filed herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.16.5)
|
|
Participation Agreement (TRL III
2003-1C)
dated as of November 12, 2003 between TRL III-1C among
Trinity Rail Leasing III L.P., lessee, et. al. (filed
herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.17)
|
|
Equipment Lease Agreement (TRL IV
2004-1A)
between TRL IV
2004-1A
Statutory Trust, lessor, and Trinity Rail Leasing IV L.P.,
lessee (filed herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.17.1)
|
|
Participation Agreement (TRL IV
2004-1A)
among Trinity Rail Leasing IV, L.P., lessee, et. al (filed
herewith).
|
|
(10
|
.18)
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 10,
2004 among Trinity Industries, Inc, as Borrower, JP Morgan Chase
Bank, individually as a Lender and Issuing Bank and as
Administrative Agent, and Dresdner Bank AG, New York and Grand
Cayman Branches and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc., each
individually as a Lender and collectively as Syndication Agents,
and certain other Lenders party thereto from time to time
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of Registration
Statement
No. 333-117526
filed July 21, 2004).
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO.
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
(10
|
.18.1)
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
April 20, 2005 among Trinity Industries, Inc, as Borrower,
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., individually and as Issuing Bank and
Administrative Agent, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Wachovia
Bank, N.A., and Bank of America, N.A., each individually and as
Syndication Agents, Dresdner Bank AG, Individually and as
Documentation Agent, and certain other Lenders party thereto
from time to time (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2005).
|
|
(10
|
.18.2)
|
|
First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated June 9, 2006, amending the Second Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 20, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18.2 to our
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006).
|
|
(10
|
.18.3)
|
|
Second Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated June 21, 2006, amending the Second Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 20, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18.3 to our
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006).
|
|
(10
|
.18.4)
|
|
Third Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated June 22, 2007, amending the Second Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 20, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18.4 to our
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007).
|
|
(10
|
.18.5)
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated October 19, 2007, amending the Second
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 20, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18.5 to our
Form 8-K
filed on October 19, 2007).
|
|
(10
|
.19)
|
|
Amended and Restated Warehouse Loan Agreement, dated as of
August 7, 2007, amending and restating the Warehouse Loan
Agreement dated June 27, 2002 among Trinity Industries
Leasing Company, Trinity Rail Leasing Trust II, the
Borrower, Credit Suisse, New York Branch, as Agent, Wilmington
Trust Company, as Collateral Agent and Depository, and the
Lenders party thereto from time to time (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.19.13 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007).
|
|
(10
|
.19.1)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Warehouse Loan
Agreement, dated February 13, 2008, amending the Amended
and Restated Warehouse Loan Agreement dated August 7, 2007.
(incorporated by reference to our
Form 8-K
filed on February 14, 2008).
|
|
(10
|
.23)
|
|
Retirement Transition Agreement between the Company and Jim S.
Ivy (incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 9, 2005).*
|
|
(10
|
.24)
|
|
Retirement Transition Agreement between the Company and John L.
Adams (incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 9, 2005).*
|
|
(10
|
.25)
|
|
Perquisite Plan beginning January 1, 2004 in which the
Companys Executive Officers participate (incorporated by
reference to our
Form 10-K
filed March 9, 2005).*
|
|
(10
|
.26)
|
|
Purchase and Contribution Agreement, dated May 18, 2006,
among Trinity Industries Leasing Company, Trinity Leasing
Trust II, and Trinity Rail Leasing V L.P. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.26 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006).
|
|
(10
|
.26.1)
|
|
Master Indenture dated May 18, 2006, between Trinity Rail
Leasing V L.P. and Wilmington Trust Company, as indenture
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.1 to
our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006).
|
|
(10
|
.27)
|
|
Board Compensation Summary Sheet (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.26 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006).*
|
|
(10
|
.28)
|
|
Retirement Transition Agreement between Trinity North American
Freight Car, Inc. and Martin Graham (filed herewith).*
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed
herewith).
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
Listing of subsidiaries of Trinity Industries, Inc. (filed
herewith).
|
|
(23)
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (contained on
page 77 of this document and filed herewith).
|
|
(31
|
.1)
|
|
Rule 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
(filed herewith).
|
|
(31
|
.2)
|
|
Rule 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
(filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO.
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
(32
|
.1)
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(filed herewith).
|
|
(32
|
.2)
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contracts and compensatory plan arrangements. |