e10vk
FORM 10-K
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-10684
International Game Technology
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
88-0173041 |
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
9295 Prototype Drive, Reno, Nevada 89521
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (775) 448-7777
Registrants website: www.IGT.com
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, Par Value $.00015625
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-Known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes þ No o
If this
report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required
to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes
o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March
31, 2005:
$9,159,968,750
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of
December 9, 2005:
336,951,055 shares of Common Stock, $.00015625 Par Value [Open Item]
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
DEFINITIONS
Certain abbreviations or acronyms used in this Form 10-K have the following meanings:
|
|
|
Abbreviation |
|
Definition |
Acres |
|
Acres Gaming Incorporated |
Anchor |
|
Anchor Gaming |
APB |
|
Accounting Principles Board |
ARB |
|
Accounting Research Bulletin |
ARDU |
|
average revenue per day per unit |
ARPU |
|
average revenue per unit |
ARS |
|
Auction Rate Securities |
ASP |
|
average sales price per machine |
AVP® |
|
Advanced Video Platform |
AWP |
|
Amusement with Prize |
CAD$ |
|
Canadian dollars |
CCSC |
|
Colorado Central Station Casino |
CD |
|
compact disk |
CDS |
|
central determination system |
CIP |
|
construction-in-process |
Commission |
|
Nevada Gaming Commission |
Debentures |
|
Senior Convertible Debentures due January 29, 2033 |
DVD |
|
digital video disk |
EITF |
|
Emerging Issues Task Force |
EPA |
|
Environmental Protection Agency |
EPS |
|
earnings per share |
ERP |
|
enterprise resource planning |
ESPP |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
EU |
|
European Union |
FAS |
|
Financial Accounting Standard |
FASB |
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FIN |
|
FASB Interpretations |
FSP |
|
FASB Statement of Position |
Friendly Matrix |
|
Friendly Matrix Internet Company LLC |
GCB |
|
State Gaming Control Board |
GSC |
|
Global Support Center |
Hi-Tech |
|
Hi-Tech Gaming.com, Ltd. |
JV |
|
Spin For Cash Joint Venture |
ITSÔ |
|
Intelligent Table SystemÔ |
LCD |
|
liquid crystal display |
MDA |
|
management's discussion & analysis |
MLP |
|
Multi level progressive |
NDT |
|
The Nevada Department of Taxation |
OES |
|
IGT OnLine Entertainment Systems,
Inc. and the lottery systems business of VLC, Inc., collectively |
OSHA |
|
Occupational Safety & Health Administration |
PGIC |
|
Progressive Gaming International Corporation |
pp |
|
percentage points |
R&D |
|
research and development |
RSA |
|
restricted stock award |
RFID |
|
radio frequency identification |
RFP |
|
request for proposal |
SAB |
|
Staff Accounting Bulletin |
SBÔ |
|
Server Based |
SEC |
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Sega Sammy |
|
Sega Sammy Holdings |
SFAS |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
SMI |
|
Shuffle Master, Inc. |
SG&A |
|
selling, general and administrative |
TITO |
|
ticket-in/ticket-out |
TRO |
|
temporary restraining order |
UK |
|
United Kingdom |
US |
|
United States |
VIE |
|
variable interest entity |
VLT |
|
video lottery terminal |
WW or WagerWorks |
|
WagerWorks, Inc. |
WAM |
|
Wide Area Marketing |
WAP |
|
wide area progressive |
* |
|
not meaningful (in tables) |
ii
PART I
Item 1. Business
GENERAL
International Game Technology is a global company specializing in the design, development,
manufacturing, distribution and sales of computerized gaming machines and systems products. We
strive to maintain a diverse portfolio of gaming products that span a wide range of categories and
target customer markets with a variety of games, platforms and systems offered across gaming
jurisdictions worldwide.
International Game Technology principally served the US gaming industry when founded in 1980,
expanding into jurisdictions outside of the US in 1986. In addition to our US production facility
in Reno, Nevada, we also manufacture our products in the UK and through a third party manufacturer
in Japan. We currently maintain sales offices in various locations across the US, Asia, Australia,
Canada, Europe, Japan, Latin America, New Zealand, Russia, South Africa and the UK.
International Game Technology was incorporated in Nevada in December 1980 to acquire the gaming
licensee and operating entity, IGT, and to facilitate our initial public offering. In addition to
our 100% ownership of IGT, International Game Technology has the following directly or indirectly
wholly-owned operating subsidiaries:
|
|
|
ª Acres Gaming Incorporated |
|
|
|
|
ª I.G.T. Argentina S.A. |
|
|
|
|
ª I.G.T. (Australia) Pty. Limited |
|
|
|
|
ª International Game Technology (NZ) Limited |
|
|
|
|
ª IGT Asia, Lda. |
|
|
|
|
ª IGT do Brasil LTDA. |
|
|
|
|
ª IGT Canada Inc. |
|
|
|
|
ª IGT Europe B.V. |
|
|
|
|
ª IGT Iceland Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
ª IGT Japan, K.K. |
|
|
|
|
ª IGT Maine, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
ª IGT Mexicana de Juegos, S. de R.L. de C.V. |
|
|
|
|
ª IGT UK Holdings Limited (Barcrest) |
|
|
|
|
ª International Game Technology Africa (Pty) Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
ª International Game Technology S.R. Ltda. |
|
|
|
|
ª Silicon Gaming, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
ª VLC, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
ª WagerWorks, Inc. |
Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to International Game Technology, IGT, we,
our, or the Company includes International Game Technology and our wholly-owned subsidiaries
and their subsidiaries. The meanings of certain abbreviations or acronyms used throughout this
report are listed for your reference on page ii.
In this document, italicized text with an attached superscript trademark or copyright notation
indicates trademarks of IGT or its licensors. For a complete list of trademark and copyright
ownership information, please visit our website.
IGTs principal corporate executive offices are located at:
9295 Prototype Drive
Reno, Nevada 89521
Telephone: (775) IGT-7777
Website: www.IGT.com
Through the Investor Relations link on our website, we make available free of charge, as soon as
reasonably practical after such information has been filed or furnished to the SEC, our annual
report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to
those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act.
Our corporate governance guidelines and charters for our Audit, Compensation, Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committees are also available on our website. This information will be mailed
in print form to any shareholder upon request.
1
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
We derive our revenues in two ways, either from the sale (product sales) or placement (gaming
operations) of our gaming products, services and/or intellectual properties. Operating results
reviewed by our chief decision makers encompass all revenue sources within each geographical
customer region. We currently view our business in two regional operating segments, each
incorporating all types of revenues:
|
|
ª |
The North America Division encompasses our operations in the US and Canada, including
the IGT Systems group. North America comprised 79% of consolidated revenues in fiscal
2005, 86% in 2004, and 89% in 2003. |
|
|
|
ª |
The International Division oversees our efforts abroad in Asia, Australia, New Zealand,
Europe, Japan Latin America, Russia, South Africa, and the UK. International comprised
21% of consolidated revenues in fiscal 2005, 14% in 2004, and 11% in 2003. |
Additionally, our Corporate Division administers certain unallocated income and expenses related to
company-wide initiatives. See the BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS in our MDA and Note 18 of our
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional segment and financial information.
REVENUES
In North America, we manufacture a broad range of gaming machines, consisting of
traditional casino style spinning reel slot machines, video gaming machines, government sponsored
terminals and other video gaming devices. Internationally, we target the casino style, private
club, gaming hall, government sponsored video, AWP, and pachisuro machine markets. We sell or
place hundreds of recognized game themes to customers, directly or through distributors, and
provide equipment contract financing to qualified customers. We also provide financing loans to
select customers for the development of new or expanding gaming facilities.
In addition to slot machines, we offer a variety of gaming systems products and services directed
towards enhancing the players gaming experience and providing operational efficiencies for our
customers. Our IGT Advantage Systems products encompass casino, video lottery, Class II or
electronic bingo, central determination and game server applications.
2
Product Sales
Product sales revenues are generated from the sale of gaming machines, systems, parts,
conversion kits, licenses and royalties, equipment and services. Product sales comprised 50% of
consolidated revenues in 2005 and 2003, versus 53% in 2004.
As our gaming products become more systems centric in nature, an increasing portion of our product
sales is derived from non-machine or non-box products, including systems installations, parts,
hardware upgrades and game theme conversions, and royalties or licensing fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales Composition |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
Machines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video & Spinning Reel |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
74 |
% |
AWP & Low Payout |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-machine: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming Systems |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Parts & Conversions |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
Other fees & services |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
Gaming Operations
Gaming operations revenues are generated from providing customers with our proprietary gaming
products, services, and/or intellectual properties under recurring revenue arrangements. This
revenue stream comprised 50% of consolidated revenues in fiscal 2005, 47% in 2004, and 50% in 2003.
The North America Division provides over 97% of consolidated gaming operations revenues. See Note
1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding pricing
arrangements and revenue recognition.
Growth in gaming operations revenues and gross margin are influenced by a number of factors,
including the number of machines placed, the geographic mix and variations in pricing arrangements.
Gaming operations expenses include the cost of funding jackpot payments to winners, which is
subject to interest rate volatility. We strive to continually add innovation and enhanced player
appeal to our proprietary games. In monitoring the productive life cycle of our proprietary games,
we systematically replace units experiencing declining play levels with newer games and extensions
of existing brands.
We place games under recurring revenue arrangements in 50 different North America jurisdictions,
including 22 Native American tribal districts, and 18 international locations. IGT owned units in the table below are reflected in our balance sheet under the property, plant and
equipment line item. Casino operations units include traditional casino, Tribal Class III and
Class II, CDS, and other higher yielding gaming machines. Lease operations units include racino,
VLT, and other lower yielding gaming machines. Casino owned units are machines sold that also
carry an ongoing recurring royalty fee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Gaming operations machines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IGT owned or proprietary units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino operations |
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
30,800 |
|
|
|
29,400 |
|
Lease operations |
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IGT installed base |
|
|
38,800 |
|
|
|
37,200 |
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino owned units |
|
|
17,300 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
18,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand total |
|
|
56,100 |
|
|
|
55,200 |
|
|
|
52,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
PRODUCT DEMAND
Demand for our products is driven by a number of factors:
|
|
|
ª The
replacement of older or obsolete machines due to technological
innovations |
The replacement cycle in all gaming jurisdictions represents a significant portion of
sales in any given year. It is driven primarily by competition in each market to provide
players with more entertaining and sophisticated games. As new machines are installed,
the earnings disparity and casino operators efficiencies between the older and newer
units on casino floors widen and the replacement cycle is further stimulated. We anticipate
the introduction of new, more sophisticated interactive games and systems combined with
the cost savings, convenience, and other benefits of our advanced platforms will continue
to stimulate demand for replacement machines. The willingness and ability of operators to
invest in new or additional machines is also a factor.
|
|
|
ª Casino expansion or new casino openings within existing gaming regions |
The construction of new casino properties generates product demand for the new casinos,
as well as spurring replacement machines at neighboring casinos, which tend to upgrade in
order to remain competitive.
|
|
|
ª The establishment of new gaming jurisdictions |
Over the past decade, significant increases in the market installed base of gaming
machines were driven by the growth in the number of jurisdictions with legalized gaming
and the increasing popularity of large theme-based casinos. We believe that our
manufacturing capabilities along with our innovative products provide a competitive
advantage in providing new casinos with large numbers of machines.
|
|
|
ª Player appeal, price, service, operator efficiencies, technical capability |
Entertainment value to the player is the most important feature of our products. Machine
design, hardware, software, game features and ease of play also contribute to the
earnings power of our gaming machines. All of these features are designed to
collectively improve our customers return on investment.
|
|
|
ª Manufacturers reputation and reliability |
A reputable history with customers and brand name recognition, combined with financial
strength and extensive infrastructure, encourages operators to select one manufacturers
product over another.
4
STRATEGIC ACQUISITIONS
As part of our ongoing efforts to create shareholder value, we complement our internal
resources through strategic acquisitions of businesses that:
|
|
|
ª offer opportunities to diversify our geographic reach |
|
|
|
|
ª expand our product lines and customer base |
|
|
|
|
ª leverage our technological and manufacturing infrastructure to increase our rates of return |
The acquisition costs in the table below represent the purchase consideration including debt assumed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Acquired |
|
Date |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
WagerWorks, Inc. |
|
August 2005 |
|
$ |
88.1 |
|
Hi-Tech Gaming.com, Ltd. |
|
December 2004 |
|
|
10.3 |
|
Acres Gaming Incorporated |
|
October 2003 |
|
|
134.0 |
|
Anchor Gaming |
|
December 2001 |
|
|
1,323.9 |
|
Silicon Gaming, Inc. |
|
March 2001 |
|
|
47.4 |
|
Sodak Gaming, Inc. |
|
September 1999 |
|
|
198.9 |
|
Barcrest Limited |
|
March 1998 |
|
|
72.9 |
|
Olympic Amusement Pty. Limited |
|
March 1998 |
|
|
108.9 |
|
WagerWorks
On August 25, 2005, in an all cash merger, we acquired WagerWorks, a provider of internet gaming
technology, content and services. WW brings a content portfolio and a strict policy of not
conducting business with operators who knowingly process gambling transactions from the US. We
anticipate this business combination will enable us to expand the distribution of our game content
across new channels and mediums, including the internet, mobile devices, and interactive
television.
Hi-Tech
On December 31, 2004, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Hi-Tech, our former
distributor of gaming equipment and services in Canada. This acquisition allows us to further
develop our Canadian customer relationships, integrating Hi-Tech employees with IGT resources.
Acres
We completed the acquisition of Acres, a software company specializing in the development of gaming
systems technology designed to assist casino operators in increasing patron loyalty, on October 27,
2003. This business combination gave us access to the Acres suite of integrated casino management
systems products offered under Acres BonusingÔ, Acres CashlessÔ and Acres
AdvantageÔ, as well as enabling us to:
|
|
|
ª utilize the Acres gaming systems technology to develop more integrated gaming systems products |
|
|
|
|
ª increase our competitive marketing capability |
|
|
|
|
ª position IGT as a leading global provider of casino gaming systems |
During fiscal 2004, we integrated Acres with the IGT Systems group, inclusive of development,
sales, service and operations related to all systems products.
Anchor
On December 30, 2001, we completed the acquisition of Anchor, our JV partner since 1996. We have
successfully integrated the two entities, assimilating personnel and physical resources to improve
our mix of game design, productivity, and customer service. Certain Anchor operations divested and
sold for cash subsequent to acquisition have been reclassified as discontinued operations for all
periods presented. See Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional financial
information related to these divestitures.
5
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
IGTs standing as a leader in the global gaming market is built largely on the ability to
develop, design, and deliver games that people find entertaining and want to play. This game
development strategy combined with our integrated casino management systems work together to
improve casino operations and profitability.
Our emphasis and investment in R&D helps us maintain our leadership position in the industry. In
addition to our primary development facilities located in Nevada, we have several design centers
worldwide. These strategically located centers provide a local presence and access to our
customers, allowing us to quickly respond to market needs and preferences. In fiscal 2005, we
established a new R&D group with dedicated resources focusing on development of our next generation
platforms, games and systems.
We have dedicated over 1,200 employees worldwide to product development in various disciplines from
hardware, software and firmware engineering to game design, video, multimedia, graphics and sound.
Our investment in R&D totaled $138.4 million in fiscal 2005, $129.3 million in fiscal 2004, and
$94.9 million in fiscal 2003.
Our business can be explained as the creation of game content and the delivery of these games to
the consumer via platforms and systems. We are a prominent designer of games, platforms and
systems in the gaming industry. We accomplish this by anticipating client needs, responding to
feedback and marketing trends, and pioneering innovative gaming machines and reliable systems
solutions. Our timeline of technology introductions demonstrates these development efforts.
Our product development process is not complete until our Compliance teams ensure that each game,
product or system meets all of the requirements in each jurisdiction. IGT conducts business in
over 280 jurisdictions worldwide, as well as over 100 international jurisdictions not requiring
licensure, with over 80 people dedicated to regulatory and product compliance. During fiscal 2005,
we presented over 35,000 product submissions worldwide.
Games
We combine the elements of art, math, sound, play mechanics and technological advancements
with our entertainment license library and patented intellectual property to provide gaming
machines with a high degree of player appeal. Our continued commitment to the development of
industry leading games helps maintain our market share and profitability.
Our games are developed either by employee designers and artists or independent third party
developer arrangements, some of which include advanced funding against subsequent royalties to be
earned upon the sale or placement of products. Although we are not materially dependent upon third
party developers, these relationships provide additional sources of creative ideas and games.
In fiscal 2005, we introduced 172 new game themes for spinning reel, video and video poker in North
America. In addition, we modified these games to comply with the guidelines, rules, and
regulations for Class II, CDS, international and lottery markets, resulting in over 300 additional
game introductions. We remain the North America market leader in traditional spinning reel and
video poker games, however, competition is more intense in video games with fewer barriers to entry
and the relative ease of creation. We plan to aggressively address the competitive nature of video
game development and continue designing innovative spinning reel and poker games.
6
We successfully introduced multi level progressive games and themes, such as Fort Knox and Party
Time!® during the year. MLP games offer players the opportunity to win lower level progressive
jackpots with a higher hit frequency. We plan to expand our MLP accomplishments by adding a WAP
feature, creating a mystery mega progressive system. We continually add innovation and enhanced
player appeal into our proprietary games. With new games and enhancements, we continue to support
our flagship themes, including Wheel of Fortune®, Megabucks®, The Price is Right® and more
recently, Star Wars. We also plan to introduce a community play or multi player gaming concept
with such games as Wheel of Fortune® Special Edition Super Spin and Ancient Chinese Secret.
Using our WAM computerized testing and monitoring system, we evaluate and forecast acceptance of
new products in order to quickly identify the more popular gaming concepts. The WAM test uses a
central computer to monitor the performance of games placed in a representative sample of casinos
in key North America gaming jurisdictions. There are approximately 35 test locations that provide
us with the best possible sampling of game performance. The WAM test program allows us to test
games in a relatively short time span, resulting in a quicker release of higher performing games.
Our international strategy responds to developing markets with community presence, customized
products, and local production where feasible or required. Two separate design teams in Australia
create innovative games for the club and casino markets. In conjunction with a manufacturing
arrangement with Sega Sammy, our engineering and game development team in Japan designs IGT
pachisuro games on a Sammy platform. As well as designing AWP games for the UK and continental Europe, our Barcrest UK facility infrastructure
supports the newly created UK casino business. Additionally, our Barcrest USA design team develops games
with interactive top boxes for North America casino markets.
Platforms
Platforms are one method to deliver our game content, and we support several in order to
maximize this distribution. As gaming laws evolve allowing for the implementation of new
solutions, we strive to serve new markets with the strength and flexibility of our distinct
platforms.
By adapting our platforms and systems technologies, we have directly entered several new CDS video
bingo or lottery markets over the past 24 months. CDS machines are connected to a central server
that determines the game outcome versus traditional casino games where the outcome is determined
within the machine itself. The development of our CDS systems, combined with our library of games,
allows IGT access to several new domestic and international jurisdictions. With this experience
and our extensive game library, we are confident in our ability to take advantage of anticipated
further growth in both domestic and international CDS markets.
Server based gaming development progressed throughout the year from a prototype demonstration
system to a market ready product. Our current server based products include capabilities to
download games, change game set configurations, create reports, as well as manage users, devices,
and wireless communications. The system works seamlessly with both our Intel-based 80960 platform
and AVP®. We also began development on the first phase of online game ordering, allowing customers
to order games via CD or DVD directly from the IGT website.
We anticipate field trials of our SB product during the latter half of fiscal 2006 at several
properties. During fiscal 2007, we plan to focus development efforts on integrating existing
casino system products with SB technology. Ultimately, we believe our SB products will not only
allow our customers to modify, add and delete games and configurations, but will also provide
direct player marketing and communication, create a dynamic floor management system, and offer the
next generation of game play features.
AVP® is designed to support our next generation of further enhanced video games. This platform
provides improved graphic capabilities such as full screen live streaming videos and animations
with vivid colors along with an enhanced stereo sound system. AVP® also greatly expands storage
capacity, allowing for complex bonusing features. Our library of AVP® games continues to grow as
it transcends into our standard development platform.
Platforms utilizing the 80960 processor include our:
|
|
ª |
Game KingÒ video platform, offering a single or multi-game format, a touch screen
monitor, and interactive video slot games with animated graphics and secondary bonusing
features |
|
|
|
ª |
S2000Ô spinning reel platform, which combines one of our broadest game libraries
with upgraded processor boards and an enhanced sound package |
7
Multi-line, multi-coin video games are currently among the most popular games on the casino floor.
In response to this trend, our products employ advanced technology to enhance entertainment and
communication features, while retaining many of the familiar and popular features of legacy games.
In fiscal 2005, we updated processor boards in Game KingÒ and S2000Ô
platforms, improving the overall system performance, graphics resolution, and color spectrum.
Additionally, we also added Ethernet support for high-speed networking, enabling future game
downloading. The updated S2000Ô processor board also allows for additional reels.
The VLC 8800Ô platform continues to hold a significant market share in the government
sponsored public gaming or video lottery markets, as governments replace their older equipment.
The 8800s can connect to all the major North America video lottery control systems. We continue
working with our customers in transitioning from the 8800 to our 80960 platform.
Cabinets
Our delivery of platforms is supported by the cabinets or hardware that we manufacture for our
customers. As our products continue to evolve, cabinets must follow suit in order to provide
players with a quality gaming experience. We expect to launch our new TrimLine cabinet powered by
AVP® in fiscal 2006. This next generation cabinet provides enhanced player ergonomics and a
reduced machine footprint, enabling operators to optimize machine placements.
Our Reel TouchÒ cabinet incorporates an LCD and corresponding touchscreen for player
interactivity and game bonusing. This cabinet includes our EZ PlayÔ selectable
multi-denominational touchpad allowing players to change the games denomination at the touch of a
button. The Video Reel TouchÒ cabinet has become the cornerstone of our CDS and Class II
games and terminals.
Systems
Our IGT Systems group is the result of the integration of Acres with IGT Gaming Systems.
Machines and systems continue to converge, as markets increasingly require that systems and games
are linked in order to satisfy regulations, and operators rely more on systems to manage machine
performance. The IGT Systems group develops integrated gaming systems and adapts IGT technologies
to fit new markets.
Our IGT AdvantageÔ Casino System is a suite of traditional casino management software
products providing operators with real-time information in the areas of slot machine performance,
patron management, reporting and analysis for table games, along with credit and banking data.
Built on the Microsoft Windows SQL platform, this system suite includes many functional features.
|
ª |
EZ Pay Ticket Systems give slot machines the ability to use
tickets, enabling players to move from one machine to another
without the inconvenience of handling coins. Ticket systems have
improved traditional slot floor operations by reducing or
eliminating coin hopper fills, simplifying hand pays, promoting
selectable-denomination gaming, and ultimately increasing play
time and customer service. |
|
|
ª |
BonusingTM applications are designed to improve game
play and manage promotional expenses with rewards and incentives
automatically delivered to players at the slot machines during
play. |
|
|
ª |
NexGenÔ touchscreen display provides operators the ability
to communicate with their customers, using the latest multimedia
technology to display player and game activity, as well as
promotions for special events and amenities. |
|
|
ª |
Loyalty GameÔ combines the growing popularity of player
clubs with a multi-line, multi-coin game, where players can use
their club cards to activate unique bonus rounds. This
multi-session game functionality provides players with added
incentive to return to the property or family of related
properties. |
We have also developed systems for central determination market games. Our CDS and Class II
systems provide features that include cross property bingo draws, game software downloading, remote
game configuration, full accounting and performance reports, virtual private networks and cashless
TITO compatibility.
We are currently developing an automated table management solution, known as Intelligent Table
SystemÔ, in conjunction with SMI and PGIC. IGT will provide the system infrastructure that
includes player tracking, cage systems interface, patron management, and bonusing. SMI will
provide the automatic card shuffler shoes that read cards, plus chip sorters and verifiers. PGIC
will contribute the RFID technology for bet recognition and chip tracking. We expect ITSÔ to
be available for market in late fiscal 2006.
8
Intellectual Property, Copyrights, Patents and Trademarks
Our intellectual property rights, patents, trademarks and copyrights are significant assets.
We seek to protect our investment in R&D and the unique and distinctive features of our products
and services by perfecting and maintaining our intellectual property rights. We obtain patent
rights protection covering many of our products and have a significant number of US and foreign
patent applications pending. Our portfolio contains approximately 1,000 active domestic and
foreign patents. The subject matter of these patents and patent applications includes game
designs, bonus and secondary game features, gaming device components, gaming systems, and a variety
of other aspects of video and electronic slot machines and associated equipment. We cannot ensure
that our intellectual property rights will not be infringed upon or that others will not develop
products in violation of our intellectual property rights. Additionally, we cannot be sure that
our pending applications for additional intellectual property rights will be granted.
Most of our products are sold under trademarks and copyrights that provide product recognition and
promote widespread acceptance. Our products may also contain other content licensed from third
parties, such as trademarks, fictional characters, or storylines. We design, manufacture, produce,
operate, use, and/or otherwise have permission to exploit certain gaming machines utilizing
materials under license from third party licensors. We seek protection for our copyrights and
trademarks in the US and various foreign countries, where applicable.
Our ability to enforce and maintain our patents, copyrights, trademarks and other intellectual
property is subject to general litigation risks. When we seek to enforce our rights, we are often
presented with various defenses, such as the intellectual property right being asserted is invalid.
In addition, our declaration of intellectual property rights often results in the other party
seeking to claim alleged intellectual property rights of its own against us.
9
MARKET REGIONS
We market our gaming products to legalized gaming jurisdictions around the world. While our
most significant markets are in North America, we continue to pursue expanding international
markets. The opportunities, challenges and our successes vary across these jurisdictions.
North America
Gaming continues to be a popular leisure activity in North America and continued development
of newer, more innovative gaming devices fuels this demand. We expect continued opportunities for
gaming growth and expansion, as we have witnessed since Midwest riverboat gaming introductions in
the early 1990s, more recently with tribal casino expansion, and growth in non-casino venues such
as race tracks or racinos and bingo parlors. The emergence of central determination and Class II
markets has spurred new growth opportunities in areas IGT was previously unable to capitalize upon
due to regulatory uncertainties. We have now developed new CDS and Class II products, opened
sales and service facilities in Oklahoma, and established a commercial presence in Alabama.
Despite a more challenging competitive environment in 2005, we continued to hold a leading share of the North America market installed base as a result of our:
|
|
ª |
commitment to innovation, game design, and technological advances in our games and systems
|
|
|
|
ª |
extensive patent and theme library
|
|
|
|
ª |
manufacturing capacity
|
|
|
|
ª |
combined team efforts in Compliance, Sales and Customer Service
|
The market installed base of gaming machines has increased from approximately 184,000 machines in
1991 to 829,000 machines in 2005. Based on internal data and information provided by various
gaming agencies, we compiled the following table of the estimated market base of gaming machines
installed in North America. Native America includes both Class II and Class III gaming machines.
Traditional gaming machines below is comprised of non-tribal casino-style installations,
including riverboats and cruise ships.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Market Base |
September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Traditional |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
221,000 |
|
Native America Tribal |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
Racino/Lottery |
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Western Region |
|
|
363,000 |
|
|
|
351,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional |
|
|
127,000 |
|
|
|
126,000 |
|
Native America Tribal |
|
|
98,000 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
Racino/Lottery |
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Central Region |
|
|
248,000 |
|
|
|
243,000 |
|
|
Traditional |
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
Native America Tribal |
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
Racino/Lottery |
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Eastern Region |
|
|
133,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
Racino/Lottery |
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Region |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
83,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America |
|
|
829,000 |
|
|
|
802,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming Expansion
We anticipate expansion of legalized gambling previously forecasted for 2005 and early 2006 will
occur in late 2006 through 2008. With recent legislative action and voter referendums, we expect
to see new markets opening in both Florida and Pennsylvania in late calendar 2006. We see strong
potential for further growth in California due to the popularity of gaming, as well as prospective
new and renegotiated tribal state compacts. We anticipate both California and Washington will
provide additional opportunities for CDS and Class II expansion, and that Florida and Oklahoma will
provide Class II growth. Further expansion in Class II markets may be impacted by the issuance of
additional clarification as to what constitutes a Class II device, pending US Department of Justice
rulings, and federal legislation currently under consideration.
We continue monitoring gaming legislation under consideration in a number of other states that
currently do not allow gaming machines, including Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Ohio and Texas.
With our leadership position in traditional Class III gaming markets and expanded CDS and Class II
product lines, we believe IGT will be the supplier of choice in any of these potential new markets.
10
Sales and Service Regions
During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we organized our North America sales and service groups
into regional areas, moving us closer, and further improving responsiveness, to our customers.
US Western Region
With a market installed base of approximately 363,000 gaming machines across 11 states, the western
region comprises over 40% of the North America market. Nevada continues to dominate this region as
the largest and most established gaming market in the world, with an installed market base of
approximately 204,000 machines in 260 casinos.
Nevadas largest concentration of gaming is located in and around Las Vegas. A major impetus for
expansion in Las Vegas occurred with the opening of Wynn Las Vegas in April 2005. The Las Vegas
off-Strip or locals market is expected to expand in 2006 with the scheduled openings of Boyds
South Coast Casino and Stations Red Rock Station Casino. With extensive restaurant and hotel
operations, these two new casinos will be major attractions for Las Vegas locals.
Northern Nevada is also showing signs of expansion. Station Casinos announced plans for two new
properties in the Reno area. In addition the Peppermill Casino in Reno announced a major expansion
and the possibility of a new property north of Reno.
The competitive landscape in Nevada casinos intensified in 2005. The completed mergers of Harrahs
with Caesars and the MGM Grand with Mandalay Bay resulted in two major casino operators on the Las
Vegas Strip. Because of our extensive game library, commitment to R&D, breadth of products,
manufacturing capacity, and financial strength, we are confident that IGT will be able to provide
the level of service these new mega-operators will demand from a supplier.
During 2005, we completed our first large installation of CDS and Class II games at the San Pablo
Casino at Lytton Rancheria in the San Francisco/Oakland area. With no significant new or
renegotiated compact tribal growth in fiscal 2005, we only sold approximately 2,000 machines in
California as properties grew to their full compacted number of units or replaced older, poorer
performing games.
We placed our first CDS games in Washington and also entered the Wyoming market in 2005 with our
first Class II installation in this state. We expect that over 5,000 new lottery machines will be
placed during 2006 in Oregon, as they replace a majority of their current games and expand their
installed base with the introduction of video reel games.
11
US Central Region
Representing approximately 30% or 248,000 gaming devices in the North America market, the central
region spans15 states and encompasses riverboat-style gaming, land-based casino gaming, compacted
Class III tribal gaming, Class II tribal gaming and VLT gaming.
The largest concentration of machines is within the so-called riverboat jurisdictions following the
course of the Mississippi and Missouri rivers in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan,
Mississippi and Missouri with approximately 127,000 machines in 91 locations. This total includes
approximately 16,000 machines at properties along the Mississippi Gulf Coast that were destroyed by
hurricane Katrina in August 2005. While there is still uncertainty regarding plans to rebuild,
legislation passed in October 2005 will allow land based gaming within 800 feet of the Mississippi
coastline. Most major operators with impacted properties have announced plans for reopening in
either rebuilt or temporary facilities in 2006. Several other operators are announcing plans for
new facilities in 2007 and 2008.
In 2005, we saw some expansion in the gulf coast region with the opening of Pinnacle
Entertainments new property, LAuberge du lac in Lake Charles, Louisiana. The property opened
with 1,600 units in May 2005. Another new property, the Hard Rock in Biloxi, Mississippi, was
scheduled to open with 1,660 units in August 2005, but the casino was destroyed by hurricane
Katrina.
Near-term expansion opportunities include four additional licenses granted by the Iowa Racing
Commission in May 2005. The new casino sites are expected to add just over 3,000 units to the
total market installed base beginning in 2006 and continuing into 2007.
Approximately 72,000 Class III and Class II gaming devices are installed at 108 tribal casino
properties in Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, North Dakota, South
Dakota, and Wisconsin. We foresee opportunities for continued TITO conversions and replacement of
older legacy products in these locations.
In June 2004, we began distributing Class II devices into Oklahoma, which has a current installed
market base of approximately 25,000 gaming machines. Legislation was passed in November 2004
allowing poker and instant bingo for tribes that enter into compacts with the state. Still in the
early stages of product introduction at the end of fiscal 2005, IGT had placed 655 CDS units and
375 poker games under revenue sharing arrangements. Due to ambiguous Class II regulation, Oklahoma
growth has been slower than originally expected. Higher tax rates recently authorized have also
inhibited the introduction of video poker in this market.
Other near-term opportunities in the central region include VLT replacements in Louisiana and South
Dakota. In 2007 and beyond, additional opportunities may arise in Arkansas, Kansas and Texas.
US Eastern Region
Comprised of approximately 133,000 gaming machines or approximately 17% of the North America
installed base, the eastern region accounted for 20% of North America sales. This region includes:
|
|
|
ª traditional casino gaming markets in Atlantic City, New Jersey and cruise ships |
|
|
|
|
ª Native American Class III casinos in Connecticut, New York, and North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
ª facilities in Delaware, Maine, New York, Rhode Island, and West Virginia monitored by
central control systems |
|
|
|
|
ª Class II/CDS facilities in Alabama and Florida |
|
|
|
|
ª Pennsylvania when its program starts in 2006 or 2007 |
Atlantic City remains the regions largest single market with approximately 42,000 machines. This
market is becoming more competitive as casino ownership concentrates due to mergers, properties
update their floors to include more table games and non-gaming amenities, and the replacement cycle
brought on by TITO is completed. Announced expansion plans include additional slot machines at the
Borgata and Harrahs in 2006. Cruise ships, each carrying approximately 200 machines, expanded
with six new ships added in 2005 and another four ships expected to launch in 2006.
In Class III markets, Seneca Niagara casino in New York and Foxwoods in Connecticut are in the
midst of Class III machine expansions. Seneca Niagara is adding 900 machines to its floor in late
calendar 2005 and Foxwoods 1,500 machine expansion is expected to open in late 2006. Seneca is
also adding a new hotel to its Seneca Allegany property and planning a new facility in Buffalo, New
York.
12
In racino markets, the New York program continued to expand with the addition of Batavia in 2005.
The anticipated opening of facilities at the Yonkers and Aqueduct tracks in late fiscal 2006 and
early fiscal 2007 will bring this program to a total of approximately 15,000 machines. IGT gained
market share in New York and Rhode Island in 2005 at existing facilities through the reallocation
process based on machine performance. Rhode Island racinos both announced expansion plans
recently, expecting to add 2,500 machines over the next several years. In both New York and Rhode
Island, IGT has long-term revenue sharing agreements in place. IGT installed machines in Penn
Nationals temporary facility in Maine when it opened in November 2005. The permanent facility
with 1,500 machines is expected to open in late 2006.
In the Class II/CDS markets, we continued to replace competitors products at Native American
properties in Florida and installed our first machines at the new 500 machine Riverside
Entertainment Center in Alabama. We expect an 850 machine expansion in the Alabama tribal market
in 2006. The Alabama charitable bingo market grew in 2005 with expansions at two facilities.
Broward County, Florida voters have passed a referendum allowing gaming at racetracks. Court
decisions have upheld the referendum and several operators have announced plans to install new
games as soon as new regulations are finalized. The Florida legislature is convening a December
2005 special session with gaming regulation for slots at tracks on the agenda.
The outcome of ongoing Florida tribal state compact negotiations will determine whether tribal
casinos will be allowed to offer Class III machines. Once regulations are promulgated and assuming
new compacts are negotiated with the Seminole tribes, we estimate the Florida market could increase
by as much as 20,000 games.
The Pennsylvania gaming program, which authorized 61,000 machines at 14 gaming locations across the
state, now appears to be a 2007 event. We estimate approximately 40,000 games will initially be
installed from 2007 through 2010. The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board has approved regulations
governing facilities and expects to award the first licenses in mid-2006. To date, only one track
has announced opening a temporary facility.
Canadian Region
During fiscal 2004, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Hi-Tech, our former distributor
of gaming equipment and services in Canada. We now provide direct sales, as well as technical and
parts support, for the Canadian Gaming Industry from four Canadian facilities.
Every province within Canada has some form of gaming. Casinos, racinos and public gaming combine
for a total installed market base of approximately 85,000 gaming devices or just under 10% of the
North America installed base. VLT programs are operated by government lottery corporations in
Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec, Saskatchewan, and the four Atlantic provinces.
In 2005, we provided machines for casino openings in Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba.
Additionally, the Atlantic Lottery Corporation opened its first racino in Charlottetown, Prince
Edward Island. While overall growth in Canadian markets has stabilized, replacements combined with
ongoing expansions provide for steady machine sales and opportunities in VLT game software.
International
IGTs presence in the international gaming markets began in 1986, and we continue to pursue
growth in this area. Our goal is to further capitalize on our design and manufacturing experiences
in North America, while addressing each international locales unique customer and regulatory
environment. Our International Division headquarters, located in the Netherlands, oversees all
international operations servicing:
|
|
|
ª casino markets in Asia, Europe, Latin America, Russia and South Africa |
|
|
|
|
ª club markets in Australia and New Zealand |
|
|
|
|
ª AWP markets in the UK and mainland Europe |
|
|
|
|
ª pachisuro market in Japan |
Casino and club gaming machines are fabricated, in whole or kit form, at our Reno facility. AWP
and pachisuro machines provide lower game economics for all suppliers due to the associated laws
and regulations. These unique markets generally require numerous game introductions and short
product life cycles and carry lower average sales prices. Certain sales to military bases and
other legal gaming markets around the world not directly supported by an international office are
supported from our Nevada facilities.
13
Gaming Expansion
Prospects continue for gaming in various new international jurisdictions. Countries around the
world are showing increased support for legalized casinos as a means of increasing tourism. We
anticipate increased financial contributions from our international operations, as these markets
continue to grow in significance over the next several years.
|
|
ª |
The UK government passed new legislation in April 2005 increasing the permitted number
of casinos, number of machines per casino, and maximum stakes and prizes per machine. |
|
|
|
ª |
Macau opened its first Las Vegas style casinos in 2004 and further growth is anticipated. |
|
|
|
ª |
Russia gaming is also projected to develop further in coming years. |
|
|
|
ª |
Singapore approved gaming legislation and expects to grant the first operator license
in late spring 2006. RFP processes are slated to begin at the end of November 2005 and
properties are expected to be operational in 2009. |
|
|
|
ª |
Gaming legalization is still under consideration in Taiwan and Thailand. |
Europe
Our office in the Netherlands was opened in 1992 to service casino markets in continental Europe,
the Middle East and North Africa. Casinos and slot halls in these markets compete with non-casino
environments such as pubs and arcades. We anticipate moderate growth in the Europe market
installed base. Our sales to this market are expected to consist of a mix of new and replacement
units, the latter being increasingly driven by cashless solutions such as TITO. Focusing on
further development of new business in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States (former
Soviet bloc countries), we opened our Moscow office in December 2004.
Latin America
With offices in Argentina and Mexico, we sell and place casino style gaming equipment in several
legalized gaming jurisdictions in Latin America. During fiscal 2005, we established an office in
Mexico in conjunction with a significant agreement with a leading live-entertainment company for
the distribution of CDS Video Bingo games, which began shipping in the fourth quarter. We plan to
develop additional CDS business in other Latin America jurisdictions.
South Africa
Our office in Midrand, Gauteng, South Africa, services the gaming markets located in Africa,
Sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian Ocean islands. Casino gaming in South Africa is governed under
their National Gambling Act, allowing for the allocation of 40 casino licenses between nine
provinces in 1996. We also pursue other Africa opportunities outside of South Africa from this
office.
Asia
Our Macau office was established in fiscal 2005 to service the Asia region. Rapid growth is
projected in Macau and the surrounding Asia region in the next few years, as countries such as
Korea, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam consider and implement further gaming
expansion and development.
Australia and New Zealand
Australia is one of the largest and most established markets for video gaming products outside of
North America. Our offices in Australia and New Zealand provide sales and customer service for
casino, club, and hotel gaming. Base or neuter machines manufactured in Reno are shipped to
Australia for completion with necessary game development, programming, testing, delivery and
installation.
Problem gaming and harm minimization continues to be an important political issue for governments
in Australia and New Zealand. Proposed measures related to further restrictions on the allowable
number of gaming machines have created uncertainty for operators and may adversely impact demand in
this region.
United Kingdom
We established a manufacturing, sales, marketing, distribution, engineering and game development
operation in Manchester, England with the acquisition of Barcrest Limited in March 1998.
Barcrest is a leading UK manufacturer of AWP games and top box products, servicing markets in
both the UK and continental Europe. An AWP machine is a game for amusement that is limited to
low payout cash prizes, typically under $45.
Our success in this market is built around three design centers focusing on UK products, along with
a design center in the Netherlands focused on products for continental Europe. Barcrest markets
are primarily replacement driven, dominated by pubs and licensed betting offices that demand
regular releases of new machines. The market installed base of AWP machines is approximately
240,000 units. To meet this demand, new products are launched in the UK every four to six weeks.
14
Additionally, we have established separate new
offices in the Midlands region and increased our UK
manufacturing capacity in preparation for the implementation of requirements under the new UK Gambling Act.
Japan
We established an office in 1990 that serves the Japan market with engineering, development,
sales, and administration from our head office in Tokyo and a logistics office in Nagano.
During fiscal 2004, we entered into a manufacturing arrangement with Sega Sammy, which has
helped position our company as a more competitive and consistent performer in the pachisuro
marketplace. The market installed base of pachisuro machines is estimated at over 1.8 million
units. The short product life cycle of these machines causes them to be replaced
approximately every two years on average.
Internet Gaming
We acquired WagerWorks in August 2005 to capitalize on the expanding internet gaming market. WW
develops, markets and operates an internet gaming solution designed to enable established consumer
oriented companies to leverage their operating expertise and brand equity online. Recognizing that
the legality of online gambling is unsettled in the United States, WW adheres to a strict operating
policy of not conducting business with customers who knowingly process gambling transactions from
the US. WW customer relations are based in the UK and Ireland. We anticipate remote gaming will
continue to mature in a regulated manner and WW will facilitate the distribution of our game
content across new channels and mediums including the internet, mobile devices, and interactive
television.
COMPETITION
The market for gaming machines and systems is intensely competitive. The principal method of
competition is product development. We are confident that our diverse library of strong performing
games and intellectual property provides a strong competitive advantage. Other ways we remain
competitive include the quality and breadth of our sales and service organizations, our financial
strength as a manufacturer, and pricing. We provide substantial marketing and advertising support
for our gaming products and compete on the basis of our extensive infrastructure, popular brand
names, product appeal, jackpot awards, player loyalty, technical expertise and marketing
experience.
Our competitors include, but are not limited to, the following manufacturers that have developed
casino products and are either authorized to sell products or are in the licensing process in many
US and foreign gaming jurisdictions:
|
|
|
ª Ainsworth Gaming Technology |
|
|
|
|
ª Alliance Gaming Corp (Bally Gaming) |
|
|
|
|
ª Aristocrat Leisure Limited |
|
|
|
|
ª Aruze, formerly known as Universal |
|
|
|
|
ª Cirsa Group |
|
|
|
|
ª GTech |
|
|
|
|
ª Gauselmann Group (Atronics) |
|
|
|
|
ª Franco Gaming, Ltd., a division of Recreativos Franco |
|
|
|
|
ª Konami Co. Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
ª Multimedia Gaming Inc. |
|
|
|
|
ª Novomatic Industries |
|
|
|
|
ª Progressive Gaming International Corporation |
|
|
|
|
ª Rocket Gaming Systems |
|
|
|
|
ª Scientific Games Corporation |
|
|
|
|
ª Shuffle Master Inc. |
|
|
|
|
ª Stargames |
|
|
|
|
ª Video Game Technologies |
|
|
|
|
ª WMS Industries
|
15
OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW
Manufacturing and Suppliers
In addition to our US production facility in Reno, Nevada, we also manufacture our products in the
UK and through a third party manufacturer in Japan. Our manufacturing operations primarily involve
the assembly of electronic components, cables, harnesses, video monitors and prefabricated parts
purchased from outside sources. We also operate facilities for cabinet manufacturing, silkscreen,
and digital design in the US. We have a broad base of material suppliers and utilize
multi-sourcing practices to ensure component availability.
Our Reno facility has 787,000 square feet currently devoted to manufacturing, warehousing, shipping
and receiving. Construction initiated in fiscal 2004 to enlarge our Reno facility with additional
space for offices, manufacturing, and a new data center was completed in fiscal 2005. We began the
process of consolidating various Las Vegas leased facilities and approximately 800 employees into a
new 37-acre IGT central campus in fiscal 2004 and estimate completion in 2007.
During fiscal 2005, our Reno facility maintained the ISO 9001.2000 manufacturing industry
certification demonstrating that our quality management is held to the highest industry standards.
The ISO standards represent an international consensus with respect to the design and use of
practices intended to ensure ongoing customer satisfaction with consistent delivery of products and
services.
We generally carry a significant amount of inventory due to the broad range of products we
manufacture and to facilitate our capacity to fill customer orders on a timely basis. Our product
sales backlog orders totaled approximately $442.1 million at October 31, 2005 and $328.6 million at
October 31, 2004. Our backlog orders for proprietary games totaled approximately 8,800 units at
October 31, 2005 and 5,400 units at October 31, 2004. We reasonably expect to fill our backlog
within fiscal 2006.
Sales and Distribution
Our products and services are sold to gaming operators and governmental entities that conduct
gaming operations. We market our products and proprietary systems through our internal sales
staff, agents and distributors. We employ approximately 250 sales personnel in various North
America and international locations.
We use third party distributors and agents for sales and placements in certain markets. Our
distributor agreements do not specify minimum purchases, but generally provide that we may
terminate the distribution agreement if certain performance standards have not been satisfied.
Customer Service
We consider customer service an important aspect of our overall marketing strategy and a key factor
differentiating us from our competitors. Customers are provided product delivery and installation
services, warranty services, after-market technical services and new product support services.
Equipment spare parts, product retrofit and game conversion services are also provided. We
typically provide a 90-day service and parts warranty program in North America and up to a 180-day
warranty service internationally for our gaming machines. We employ more than 900 trained customer
service personnel in 34 customer service support centers in all major North America gaming
jurisdictions and internationally in Argentina, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, South Africa, the
Netherlands and the UK.
We also provide extensive customer education and service through customer product and employee
training, technical employee certification programs, videotaped instruction, a 24-hour customer
service hotline, newsletters, our website (www.IGT.com), and the Global Support Center. The GSC is
a fully staffed facility providing 24-hour telephone support to all types of casino system
customers. The GSC has access to a range of field support engineering resources to resolve
technical issues. Through these extensive resources, IGT provides a direct link for two-way
communication between the customer and IGT and access to product information 24 hours a day, seven
days a week.
Regulatory Compliance
Our product and regulatory compliance efforts are designed to ensure that each gaming product or
system we develop meets the requirements set forth in all gaming jurisdictions worldwide. These
efforts also ensure we obtain the necessary approvals and licenses. Through our efforts we are
able to successfully sell and market our products worldwide, and provide our customers with the
assurance that our products work properly and meet jurisdictional requirements. We hold over 330
gaming licenses worldwide.
16
Information Systems
In fiscal 2005, we expanded our ERP solution for the IGT Systems group operations and are in the
process of implementing the customer online ordering system to support Server Based Gaming. We
also successfully completed the design, construction and move into a new advanced technology data
center.
Total Employees
As of September 30, 2005, we employed approximately 5,000 individuals worldwide, including 4,100 in
North America and 900 internationally. We believe we have favorable relationships with our
employees.
RESPONSIBLE GAMING
Social responsibility is a cornerstone of IGTs business philosophy. We are the only gaming
equipment manufacturer to implement a formal responsible gaming program that strives to provide
protection for vulnerable populations while helping to ensure the future of our business. As our
markets continue to expand internationally we have extended our responsible gaming efforts into
those jurisdictions. We partner with both gaming stakeholders and the problem gambling community
to raise awareness of problem gambling, promote education and research as well as provide funding
for treatment. IGT works closely with public policy makers to formulate sound responsible gaming
policies. It is our goal to provide the best gaming entertainment in the world for our customers
while endeavoring to create the most effective safety net possible for those individuals who may be
adversely affected.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
General
We operate in most legal casino gaming jurisdictions worldwide, as well as in a significant number
of legalized lottery jurisdictions. The manufacture and distribution of gaming equipment and
related software and the operation of casinos is subject to regulation in these jurisdictions by
various regulators at all levels from city and tribal officials along with federal regulatory
agencies, with the majority of oversight being provided by each individual states gaming
regulators. While the regulatory requirements vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, the majority
of these jurisdictions require:
|
|
|
ª licenses and/or permits |
|
|
|
|
ª findings of suitability |
|
|
|
|
ª documentation of qualification including evidence of financial stability |
|
|
|
|
ª other required approvals for companies who manufacture and distribute gaming equipment |
|
|
|
|
ª individual suitability of officers, directors, major stockholders and key employees |
Various gaming regulatory agencies have issued licenses allowing us to manufacture and distribute
our gaming machines and systems. IGT and our key personnel have obtained or applied for all
government licenses, permits, registrations, findings of suitability and approvals necessary to
maintain compliance with all regulatory agency requirements. Many of the regulations at each level
are similar or overlapping; however, we are required to satisfy all conditions individually for
each jurisdiction. Laws of the various gaming regulatory agencies serve to protect the public and
ensure that gaming related activity is conducted honestly, competitively, and free of corruption.
In the jurisdictions where we operate gaming machines, the oversight additionally ensures that the
local authorities receive the appropriate amount of tax revenues. As such, our operations
financial systems and reporting functions must demonstrate high levels of detail and integrity.
In some jurisdictions, regulators not only govern the activities that take place in their
particular jurisdiction, but they also oversee activities that occur in other jurisdictions to
ensure that the company is in compliance with local standards on a worldwide basis. As a Nevada
corporation, we are held responsible by our state regulatory authorities to maintain Nevada
standards for all of our operations worldwide. For this reason, in a number of jurisdictions, we
employ community staff members and legal resources familiar with local customs to assist in keeping
us compliant with applicable regulations worldwide.
The nature of the industry and our worldwide operations make this process very time consuming and
requires extensive resources. Through this process we seek to assure both regulators and investors
that all our operations maintain the highest levels of integrity and avoid any appearance of
improprieties. We have never been denied a gaming related license, nor have our licenses ever been
suspended or revoked.
17
Nevada Regulation
The manufacture, sale and distribution of gaming devices in Nevada or for use outside Nevada are
subject to extensive state and local laws, regulations and ordinances of the Nevada Gaming
Commission, the State Gaming Control Board, and various county and municipal regulatory authorities
(collectively referred to as the Nevada gaming authorities). These laws, regulations and
ordinances primarily cover the responsibility, financial stability and character of gaming
equipment manufacturers, distributors and operators, as well as persons financially interested or
involved in gaming operations.
The manufacture, distribution and operation of gaming devices require separate licenses. The laws,
regulations and supervisory procedures of the Nevada gaming authorities seek to:
|
(i) |
|
prevent unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement
with gaming at any time or in any capacity |
|
|
(ii) |
|
establish and maintain responsible accounting practices and procedures |
|
|
(iii) |
|
maintain effective control over the financial practices of licensees, including
establishing minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets
and revenues, providing reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of periodic
reports with the Nevada gaming authorities |
|
|
(iv) |
|
prevent cheating and fraudulent practices, and |
|
|
(v) |
|
provide a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees. |
Changes in these laws, regulations, procedures, and judicial or regulatory interpretations could
have an adverse effect on our gaming operations.
Our subsidiaries conducting the manufacture, sale, and distribution of gaming devices in Nevada or
for use outside Nevada, as well as the operation of slot machine routes and other gaming activities
in Nevada, are each required to be licensed by the Nevada gaming authorities. Our licenses must be
renewed periodically and the Nevada gaming authorities have broad discretion regarding such
renewals. Licenses are not transferable. Each type of machine we sell in Nevada must first be
approved by the Commission and may require subsequent machine modification. Our gaming
subsidiaries licensed in Nevada must also report substantially all loans, leases, and sales of
securities and similar financing transactions of a material nature to the GCB and/or have them
approved by the Commission. We believe we have obtained all required licenses and/or approvals
necessary to carry on our business in Nevada.
The Company is registered with the Commission as a publicly traded corporation and is required
periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Commission and to furnish
any other information that the Commission may require. No person may become a stockholder of or
receive any percentage of profits from our licensed gaming subsidiaries, without first obtaining
licenses and approvals from the Nevada gaming authorities.
Our officers, directors and key employees who are actively engaged in the administration or
supervision of gaming and/or directly involved in gaming activities of our licensed gaming
subsidiaries may be required to file applications with the Nevada gaming authorities and may be
required to be licensed or found suitable by them. Officers, directors, and certain key employees
of our licensed gaming subsidiaries must file applications with the Nevada gaming authorities and
may be required by them to be licensed or found suitable.
In addition, anyone having a material relationship or involvement with us or any of our licensed
gaming subsidiaries may be required to be found suitable or licensed and to pay to the GCB all of
its investigation costs and fees. The Commission may deny an application for licensure or finding
of suitability for any cause deemed reasonable. A finding of suitability is comparable to
licensing and both require submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a
thorough background investigation. We must report changes in licensed positions to the Commission.
The Commission may disapprove any change in position by one of our officers, directors, or key
employees, or require us to suspend or dismiss officers, directors or other key employees and sever
relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications or whom the Nevada
gaming authorities find unsuitable to act in such capacities. Determinations of suitability or of
questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Nevada.
We are required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Commission. If the
Commission determines that we are in violation of any gaming laws, our gaming licenses can be
limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked. In addition, the Company, our licensed gaming
subsidiaries and any persons involved may be subject to substantial fines for each separate
violation of the gaming laws at the discretion of the Commission. The Commission also has the
power to appoint a supervisor to operate our gaming properties and, under certain circumstances,
earnings generated during the supervisors appointment could be forfeited to the State of Nevada.
The limitation, conditioning or suspension of our gaming licenses or the appointment of a
supervisor could (and revocation of our gaming licenses would) materially and adversely affect our
gaming operations.
18
The Commission may require any beneficial holder of our voting securities, regardless of the number
of shares owned, to file an application, be investigated, and be found suitable, in which case the
applicant would be required to pay the costs and fees of the GCB investigation. If the beneficial
holder of voting securities who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership, or trust, it
must submit detailed business and financial information including a list of beneficial owners. Any
person who acquires more than 5% of the Companys voting securities must report this to the
Commission. Any person who becomes a beneficial owner of more than 10% of our voting securities
must apply for a finding of suitability within 30 days after the Chairman of the GCB mails the
written notice requiring this finding of suitability.
Under certain circumstances, an institutional investor, as this term is defined in the Nevada
gaming regulations, acquiring more than 10% but not more than 15% of our voting securities, may
apply to the Commission for a waiver of these finding of suitability requirements, provided the
institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional
investor will not be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting
securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of its business. Our voting
securities must not be acquired for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly,
|
(i) |
|
the election of a majority of our board of directors, |
|
|
(ii) |
|
any change in our corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies or operations, or |
|
|
(iii) |
|
any other action the Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding our voting
securities for investment purposes only. |
The Commission considers voting on all matters voted on by stockholders and the making of
financial and other informational inquiries of the type normally made by securities analysts, to
be consistent with investment intent.
The Commission has the power to investigate any person who holds our debt or equity securities.
The Clark County Liquor and Gaming Licensing Board, with jurisdiction over gaming in the Las Vegas
area, may similarly require a finding of suitability of a security holder. The applicant
stockholder is required to pay all costs of such investigation. Our bylaws provide for us to pay
these costs that are related to our officers, directors or employees.
Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days
after being ordered to do so by the Commission or the Chairman of the GCB may be found unsuitable.
The same restrictions apply to a record owner who fails to identify the beneficial owner, if
requested to do so. Any stockholder found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any
beneficial ownership of our common stock beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the
Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense.
We are subject to disciplinary action and possible loss of our approvals if, after we receive
notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with us or
any of our licensed gaming subsidiaries, we:
|
(i) |
|
pay that person any dividend or interest upon our voting securities, |
|
|
(ii) |
|
allow that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred
through securities held by that person, |
|
|
(iii) |
|
give remuneration in any form to that person, for services rendered or otherwise, or |
|
|
(iv) |
|
fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his
voting securities for cash at fair market value. |
Additionally, the Clark County authorities have taken the position that they have the authority to
approve all persons owning or controlling the stock of any corporation controlling a gaming
licensee.
The Commission may, in its discretion, require the holder of our debt securities to file an
application, be investigated and be found suitable to own any of our debt securities. If the
Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own any of these securities, then pursuant to
the Nevada gaming laws, we can be sanctioned, including the loss of our approvals, if without prior
Commission approval, we:
|
(i) |
|
pay to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest, or any distribution whatsoever; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
recognize any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such
securities; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
pay the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or |
|
|
(iv) |
|
make any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion,
exchange, liquidation, or similar transaction. |
19
We are required to maintain a current stock ledger in Nevada, subject to examination by the
Commission at any time. If any of our securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee,
the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the
Commission. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder
unsuitable. We are also required to render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the
beneficial owner. The Commission has the power at any time to require our stock certificates to
bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Nevada gaming laws and the
regulations of the Commission. To date, the Commission has not imposed this requirement on us.
We may not make a public offering of our securities without the prior approval of the Commission if
the securities or their proceeds are intended to be used to construct, acquire or finance gaming
facilities in Nevada, or retire or extend obligations incurred for such purposes. Such approval,
if given, does not constitute a finding, recommendation, or approval by the Commission or the GCB
as to the accuracy or adequacy of the prospectus or the investment merits of the securities. Any
representation to the contrary is unlawful.
In July 2005, the Commission granted us prior approval to make public offerings for a period of two
years, subject to certain conditions (referred to as a shelf approval). The chairman of the GCB
may rescind the shelf approval for good cause without prior notice upon the issuance of an
interlocutory stop order. The shelf approval does not constitute a finding, recommendation, or
approval by the Commission or the GCB as to the accuracy or adequacy of the prospectus or the
investment merits of the securities offered. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful.
Changes in control of the Company through merger, consolidation, acquisition of assets or stock,
management or consulting agreements or any form of takeover cannot occur without the prior
investigation of the GCB and approval of the Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of us
must satisfy the GCB and the Commission in a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming
control. The Commission may also require controlling stockholders, officers, directors and other
persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control,
to be investigated and licensed as part of the approval process relating to the transaction.
The Nevada legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management,
repurchases of voting securities and other corporate defense tactics that affect Nevada gaming
licensees, and publicly traded corporations that are affiliated with those operations, may be
injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Commission has established a regulatory
scheme to guard against the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevadas
gaming industry and to further Nevadas policy to:
|
(i) |
|
assure the financial stability of corporate gaming operators and their affiliates |
|
|
(ii) |
|
preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and |
|
|
(iii) |
|
promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs. |
Approvals are, in certain circumstances, required from the Commission before we can make
exceptional repurchases of voting securities above their current market price and before a
corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. Nevadas gaming laws and
regulations also require prior approval by the Commission if we were to adopt a plan of
recapitalization proposed by our board of directors in opposition to a tender offer made directly
to our stockholders for the purpose of acquiring control of us.
License fees and taxes are imposed by the Nevada gaming authorities and are either payable
quarterly or annually. The fees and taxes are computed in various ways depending on the type of
activity involved by our subsidiaries and the cities and counties where our subsidiaries conduct
operations. Annual fees are payable to the GCB to renew our licenses as a manufacturer,
distributor, and operator of a slot machine route. Nevada law also requires persons providing
gaming machines in Nevada to casino customers on a revenue participation basis to pay their
proportionate share of the taxes imposed on gaming revenues generated by the participation gaming
machines.
Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, required to be registered, or is
under common control with such persons (collectively referred to as licensees), and who proposes to
participate in the conduct of gaming operations outside of Nevada is required to deposit with the
GCB, and thereafter maintain, a revolving fund in the amount of $10,000 to pay the expenses of
investigation by the GCB of the licensees participation in foreign gaming. This revolving fund is
subject to increase or decrease at the discretion of the Commission. As a licensee, we are
required to comply with certain reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada laws. We are also
subject to disciplinary action by the Commission if we knowingly violate any laws of the foreign
jurisdiction pertaining to our foreign gaming operation, fail to conduct our foreign gaming
operations in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming
operations, engage in activities that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability to collect
gaming taxes and fees, or employ a person in the foreign operation who has been denied a license or
finding of suitability in Nevada on the grounds of personal unsuitability.
20
Federal Registration
The Gambling Devices Act of 1962 makes it unlawful for a person to manufacture, transport, or
receive gaming machines, gaming devices or components across interstate lines unless that person
has first registered with the Attorney General of the US Department of Justice. In addition,
gambling device identification and record keeping requirements are imposed by this act. Violation
of this act may result in seizure and forfeiture of the equipment, as well as other penalties.
Entities involved in the manufacture and transportation of gaming devices are required to register
annually. We are confident that we have complied with the registration requirements of this act.
Native American Gaming Regulation
Federal law, tribal-state compacts, and tribal gaming regulations govern gaming on Native American
lands. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 provides the framework for federal and state
control over all gaming on Native American lands and is administered by the National Indian Gaming
Commission and the Secretary of the US Department of the Interior. The commission has authority to
issue regulations governing tribal gaming activities, approve tribal ordinances for regulating
gaming, approve management agreements for gaming facilities, conduct investigations and monitor
tribal gaming generally. The act is subject to interpretation by the commission and may be subject
to judicial and legislative clarification or amendment.
The act requires that the tribe and the state enter into a written agreement, a tribal-state
compact, which governs the terms of the gaming activities. Tribal-state compacts vary from
state-to-state and in many cases require equipment manufacturers and/or distributors to meet
ongoing registration and licensing requirements. In addition, tribal gaming commissions have been
established by many Native American tribes to regulate gaming-related activity on Indian lands.
Indian tribes are sovereign in their own government systems, with primary regulatory authority over
gaming on land within the tribes jurisdiction. IGT distributes gaming equipment to Native
American tribes who have negotiated compacts with their states and/or have received federal
approval where required.
International Regulation
Certain foreign countries permit the importation, sale and operation of gaming equipment in casino
and non-casino environments. Some countries prohibit or restrict the payout feature of the
traditional slot machine or limit the operation and the number of slot machines to a controlled
number of casinos or casino-like locations. Each gaming machine must comply with the individual
countrys regulations. Certain jurisdictions require the licensing of gaming machine operators and
manufacturers.
We manufacture and supply gaming equipment to various international markets including Africa, Asia,
Australia, Europe, Japan, Latin America, New Zealand, and the UK. We have obtained the required
licenses to manufacture and distribute our products in the various foreign jurisdictions where we
do business.
Internet Gaming Regulatory Environment
With the acquisition of WagerWorks in August 2005, we now provide online gaming content and
services for certain jurisdictions. This sector is highly regulated, principally with respect to
the operation of online casinos, but impacts product development and offering as well. In order to
comply with regulations, WW has developed an extensive operational control structure spanning the
software and game development process, computer operations, consumer cash handling, and identity
checking.
The legality of online gaming in the US is unsettled and therefore, while many competitors take
bets from US citizens, WW does not. While it is legal to take bets online from UK citizens the UK
does not provide a regulatory framework from which to operate online. WW therefore, operates its
online casinos from Alderney in the British Channel Islands, regulated by the Alderney Gaming
Control Commission.
21
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS
Risk Factors and Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K we make some forward looking statements which do not
relate to historical or current facts, but are forward looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to analyses and other
information based on forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable.
These statements also relate to our future prospects and proposed new products, services,
developments or business strategies. These statements are identified by their use of terms and
phrases such as anticipate, believe, could, would, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, predict,
project, pursue, will, continue, feel, or the negative or other variations thereof, and other
similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions, and include but are not limited to
the following:
|
|
|
ª expectations about our ability to introduce new products and stimulate replacement demand |
|
|
|
|
ª estimates of our market share and competitive advantage |
|
|
|
|
ª estimates about the total market installed base |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations about gaming expansion and new market opportunities |
|
|
|
|
ª judgments and assumptions related to our critical accounting estimates |
|
|
|
|
ª estimates about our tax exposure and tax rates |
|
|
|
|
ª estimates of expected gross profit margins |
|
|
|
|
ª estimates about replacement market trends |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations about our available capital resources |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations about losses from off-balance sheet arrangements |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations about foreign exchange rate gain and losses |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations about incremental future growth through acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations about opportunities to increase profit contribution |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations about future gaming product developments |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations about capitalizing on new and expanding market opportunities |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations about ensuring access to new distribution channels |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations about gaining access to important intellectual property |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations regarding impacts to future EPS |
|
|
|
|
ª expectations regarding regulatory developments |
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any of our forward looking statements are
reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied. Our future
financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward looking statements, are
subject to change and to inherent known and unknown risks and uncertainties. We do not intend, and
undertake no obligation, to update our forward looking statements to reflect future events or
circumstances.
We urge you to carefully review the following discussion of the specific risks and uncertainties
that affect our business. These include, but are not limited to, the following:
Our success in the gaming industry depends in large part on our ability to develop innovative
products and systems and would be adversely affected by:
|
|
|
ª a decline in the popularity of our gaming products with players |
|
|
|
|
ª a lack of success in developing new products |
|
|
|
|
ª an inability to roll out new games on schedule |
|
|
|
|
ª an increase in the popularity of competitors games |
|
|
|
|
ª a negative change in the trend of consumer acceptance of our newest systems innovations |
Our business is vulnerable to changing economic conditions, including:
|
|
|
ª unfavorable changes in economic conditions including those that affect the relative
health of the gaming industry |
|
|
|
|
ª unfavorable changes in tax laws or application of such laws that could reduce our profitability |
|
|
|
|
ª political or economic instability in international markets |
|
|
|
|
ª changes in interest rates causing a reduction of investment income or in the value of
market rate sensitive instruments |
|
|
|
|
ª fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, tariffs and other trade barriers |
|
|
|
|
ª an inability to effectively hedge our foreign currency exposures |
22
Demand for our products would be adversely affected by:
|
|
ª |
reduced growth or continued delays of new market openings and/or existing market expansions |
|
|
|
ª |
delays of scheduled openings of newly constructed or planned casinos |
|
|
|
ª |
reduced levels of play or weakened customer demand for our gaming machines as a result
of declines in travel activity, jackpot fatigue, or customer capital expenditures |
|
|
|
ª |
a decrease in the desire of established gaming properties to upgrade machines, resulting
in a decline in the demand for replacement machines |
|
|
|
ª |
uncertain timing for technology upgrades |
|
|
|
ª |
loss of casino floor space to table games |
|
|
|
ª |
casino operators designing and developing slot machine content |
|
|
|
ª |
casino operators developing strategic alliances with competitors |
|
|
|
ª |
a decline in public acceptance of gaming |
We operate in a highly regulated industry and our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions
could be adversely affected by:
|
|
ª |
unfavorable public referendums or anti-gaming legislation |
|
|
|
ª |
unfavorable legislation affecting or directed at manufacturers or gaming operators, such
as referendums to increase taxes on gaming revenues |
|
|
|
ª |
adverse changes in or findings of non-compliance with applicable governmental gaming regulations |
|
|
|
ª |
delays in legislative actions and/or approvals from regulatory agencies |
|
|
|
ª |
a limitation, conditioning, suspension or revocation of any of our gaming licenses |
|
|
|
ª |
unfavorable determinations or challenges of suitability by gaming regulatory authorities
with respect to our officers, directors or key employees |
|
|
|
ª |
customers inability to repay IGT development financing loans due to unfavorable
legislation, regulation, or regulatory interpretation that impairs their ability to conduct
planned gaming operations |
Our intellectual property rights are subject to risks, including:
|
|
ª |
potential inability to obtain, maintain and protect our patents, trademarks, copyrights
or theme licensing rights used competitively in development of our games and technology |
|
|
|
ª |
competitors infringement upon our existing trademarks, patents and copyrights |
|
|
|
ª |
approval of competitors patent applications that may restrict our ability to compete effectively |
Our outstanding debt obligations subject us to certain additional risks, including:
|
|
ª |
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions |
|
|
|
ª |
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital,
capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate requirements |
|
|
|
ª |
requiring a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations for the payment of
interest on our indebtedness and reducing our ability to use our cash flows to fund working
capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and general corporate requirements |
|
|
|
ª |
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry |
|
|
|
ª |
disadvantaging us compared to competitors with less indebtedness |
Our business operations are subject to other risks, including:
|
|
ª |
loss or retirement of our key executives or other key employees |
|
|
|
ª |
adverse changes in the creditworthiness of parties with whom we have significant
receivables or forward currency exchange contracts |
|
|
|
ª |
the discovery of facts or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of facts not
presently known to us or not in accordance with our evaluation of possible liability or the
outcome of existing litigation related to legal actions pending against IGT |
|
|
|
ª |
the timely and cost effective integration of acquired companies into our operations |
|
|
|
ª |
increased costs due to reliance on third party suppliers and contract manufacturers |
|
|
|
ª |
agreements with casinos in Native America jurisdictions which may subject us to sovereign immunity risk |
|
|
|
ª |
acts of war or terrorist incidents |
|
|
|
ª |
continued work through several implementation phases of our company-wide ERP solution
for computer system procedures and controls; any failures, difficulties or significant
delays in implementing or maintaining computer information systems could result in material
adverse consequences to our business, including disruption of operations, loss of
information and unanticipated increases in costs |
23
Item 2. Properties
We expect our current properties will be adequate for our near-term business needs.
Corporate Headquarters
Our largest manufacturing facility and corporate headquarters are located in Reno, Nevada, where we
built a facility of more than 1.2 million square feet to house our manufacturing, cabinet
production, silkscreen, engineering, sales and corporate administrative functions. This facility
supports production for North America and all international markets, except Japan and the UK. In
fiscal 2005, we completed an expansion of our Reno facility adding more than 100,000 square feet.
We also maintain leased warehousing facilities in Reno totaling 204,000 square feet.
North America Sales and Service
Our largest sales and service office is located in Las Vegas, Nevada, where we lease
approximately 364,000 square feet in warehousing, sales and administration facilities. These
operating leases expire between July 2006 and December 2007. In fiscal 2004, we purchased land
and began construction of a new 600,000 square foot Las Vegas campus, primarily to consolidate
several leased facilities, that is scheduled for completion in 2007. Additionally, we lease
approximately 411,100 square feet of warehousing, sales and service facilities throughout the US
and Canada to support local market needs. We also own a 94,000 square foot building in Rapid
City, South Dakota, which formerly supported Native American gaming markets. With a majority of
the Rapid City functions redistributed during 2005, we decided to list this property for sale in
the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
International
Our most significant international facilities are located in the UK and Australia. We own 149,000
square feet and lease 42,000 square feet under leases expiring between March 2007 and December
2009, which support manufacturing, sales and administrative functions in the UK. We own 12,000
square feet in New Zealand and lease 138,000 square feet in Australia under leases expiring between
October 2006 and April 2008, for subassembly, sales and administration. All other properties used
for international operations total 191,000 square feet, mostly under leases expiring between
January 2006 and May 2012.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
IGT has been named in and has brought lawsuits in the normal course of business. We do not
expect the outcome of these suits to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or
results of operations. For a description of certain of these matters, see Note 13 of our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
24
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol IGT. The
following table presents the high and low closing prices of our common stock as traded on the NYSE
and quarterly cash dividends declared for the last two fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price |
|
Stock Price |
|
Dividends |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Declared |
Fiscal 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
36.67 |
|
|
$ |
31.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.120 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
33.87 |
|
|
|
26.23 |
|
|
|
0.120 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
30.21 |
|
|
|
24.22 |
|
|
|
0.120 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
29.43 |
|
|
|
26.49 |
|
|
|
0.125 |
|
|
Fiscal 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
36.96 |
|
|
$ |
28.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.100 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
45.78 |
|
|
|
34.65 |
|
|
|
0.100 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
46.82 |
|
|
|
33.45 |
|
|
|
0.100 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
38.17 |
|
|
|
28.72 |
|
|
|
0.120 |
|
There were approximately 2,863 record holders of IGTs common stock and the closing price
was $29.70 as of December 1, 2005.
|
|
|
IGTs
transfer agent and registrar is:
|
|
The Bank of New York |
|
|
63 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor |
|
|
New York, NY 10016 |
|
|
(212) 503-4279 |
Stock Repurchases
Under the 1990 IGT common stock repurchase plan, as amended and adjusted for stock splits, our
remaining share repurchase authorization totaled 23.1 million at September 30, 2005. The stock
repurchase authorization is used to return value to our shareholders and reduce the number of
shares outstanding. The shares may be repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions, depending on market conditions and other factors. There is no expiration date
specified for this plan. Our fourth quarter repurchases are summarized below.
Shares purchased in the table below exclude treasury shares acquired in non-cash transactions
related to forfeited stock awards or shares exchanged for options exercised. We repurchased an
additional 1.9 million shares between the period October 2, 2005 and December 9, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Shares Still |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of a |
|
|
Available for |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
Purchase Under |
|
Periods |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Announced Plan |
|
|
the Plan |
|
|
July 3,
2005 July 30, 2005 |
|
|
582,500 |
|
|
$ |
27.80 |
|
|
|
582,500 |
|
|
|
28,208,625 |
|
July 31,
2005 August 27, 2005 |
|
|
3,827,400 |
|
|
|
27.06 |
|
|
|
3,827,400 |
|
|
|
24,381,225 |
|
August 28,
2005 October 1, 2005 |
|
|
1,289,100 |
|
|
|
26.96 |
|
|
|
1,289,100 |
|
|
|
23,092,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,699,000 |
|
|
|
27.12 |
|
|
|
5,699,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8, Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003(1) |
|
|
2002(1) |
|
|
2001 |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,379.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,484.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,128.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,728.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,199.2 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,190.7 |
|
|
|
1,319.2 |
|
|
|
1,094.8 |
|
|
|
842.9 |
|
|
|
534.9 |
|
Earnings of unconsolidated affiliates(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
142.6 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
663.7 |
|
|
|
814.3 |
|
|
|
665.9 |
|
|
|
516.5 |
|
|
|
395.3 |
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax(2,3) |
|
|
436.5 |
|
|
|
429.8 |
|
|
|
375.3 |
|
|
|
254.7 |
|
|
|
213.9 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.9 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(2,4) |
|
|
436.5 |
|
|
|
488.7 |
|
|
|
390.7 |
|
|
|
271.2 |
|
|
|
213.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
343.7 |
|
|
|
346.8 |
|
|
|
344.0 |
|
|
|
338.4 |
|
|
|
295.4 |
|
Diluted(6) |
|
|
370.2 |
|
|
|
376.3 |
|
|
|
366.7 |
|
|
|
344.2 |
|
|
|
306.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share(5) |
|
$ |
0.485 |
|
|
$ |
0.420 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from operations |
|
$ |
726.4 |
|
|
$ |
623.6 |
|
|
$ |
408.7 |
|
|
$ |
589.1 |
|
|
$ |
273.6 |
|
Cash from investing |
|
|
(215.8 |
) |
|
|
364.8 |
|
|
|
(597.5 |
) |
|
|
105.1 |
|
|
|
(280.1 |
) |
Cash from financing(7) |
|
|
(525.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,121.7 |
) |
|
|
420.7 |
|
|
|
(589.2 |
) |
|
|
(32.6 |
) |
Capital expenditures(8) |
|
|
238.6 |
|
|
|
210.9 |
|
|
|
128.6 |
|
|
|
116.2 |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
Cash used for share repurchases |
|
|
354.7 |
|
|
|
129.8 |
|
|
|
161.3 |
|
|
|
249.3 |
|
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
Cash and short-term investments(7,11) |
|
$ |
688.1 |
|
|
$ |
766.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,315.6 |
|
|
$ |
430.2 |
|
|
$ |
377.3 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
219.6 |
|
|
|
949.7 |
|
|
|
1,133.1 |
|
|
|
750.6 |
|
|
|
596.8 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
3,864.4 |
|
|
|
3,873.0 |
|
|
|
4,185.2 |
|
|
|
3,315.8 |
|
|
|
1,923.4 |
|
Notes payable, net(7,9) |
|
|
811.0 |
|
|
|
791.9 |
|
|
|
1,552.9 |
|
|
|
972.0 |
|
|
|
989.8 |
|
Jackpot liabilities(10) |
|
|
705.8 |
|
|
|
719.3 |
|
|
|
541.1 |
|
|
|
577.7 |
|
|
|
343.6 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,905.7 |
|
|
|
1,976.6 |
|
|
|
1,687.5 |
|
|
|
1,433.1 |
|
|
|
296.1 |
|
Shares outstanding(5) |
|
|
338.2 |
|
|
|
346.1 |
|
|
|
345.5 |
|
|
|
347.3 |
|
|
|
291.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The results of Anchor and the consolidation of the JV following the
acquisition of Anchor on December 30, 2001 were included for nine months in fiscal 2002 and
the full year thereafter. Prior to the Anchor acquisition, our share of the JV was
reflected net of expenses in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates. |
|
|
(2)
|
Fiscal 2002 included pretax reductions of: $20.2 million ($12.6 million after tax
or $0.03 per diluted share) related to certain litigation settlements; and $21.2 million
($13.2 million after tax or $0.04 per diluted share) for losses on early retirement of debt. |
|
|
(3)
|
Fiscal 2004 includes pretax reductions of: $127.9 million ($81.4 million after tax
or $0.22 per diluted share) for losses on early retirement of debt. |
|
|
(4)
|
Certain operations acquired with Anchor were sold or held for sale, and therefore
reclassified, including gain/loss on sale, to discontinued operations for all periods
presented. Fiscal 2004 includes gain on sale of $56.8 million after tax. |
|
|
(5)
|
Shares and per share amounts for all periods presented have been adjusted to
reflect the four-for-one stock split effective June 18, 2003. |
|
|
(6)
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding reflect inclusion of outstanding
convertible debenture shares for all periods presented in conjunction with adoption of EITF
04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted EPS, adopted in our first
quarter ended December 31, 2004. |
|
|
(7)
|
Fiscal 2004 includes $969.6 million of principal debt reduction. Fiscal 2003
includes the proceeds of $575.0 million from the issuance of our debentures. |
|
|
(8)
|
Capital spending has increased progressively since fiscal 2001 predominantly due to
additional investments in gaming operations equipment. |
|
|
(9)
|
Notes payable is presented net of unamortized discount. |
|
|
(10)
|
Jackpot liabilities included an additional $149.9 million at September 30, 2005
and $165.2 million at September 30, 2004 from VIE consolidations. |
|
|
(11)
|
Includes restricted amounts. |
26
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis
COMPANY OVERVIEW
The following MDA is intended to enhance the readers understanding of International Game
Technology, our operations and our present business environment. MDA is provided as a supplement
to and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes. Throughout this section, table amounts are presented in millions, except units,
ASP, ARPU, ARDU, and EPS.
Our MDA is organized into the following sections:
|
ª |
|
OUR BUSINESS a general description of our business and operating segments |
|
|
ª |
|
OUR FOCUS a summary of our strategies and opportunities |
|
|
ª |
|
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS a discussion of recently issued accounting
standards with significance to our business |
|
|
ª |
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES a discussion of accounting policies that require
critical judgments and estimates |
|
|
ª |
|
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS a comparative analysis of income from continuing
operations for the three fiscal years presented in our consolidated financial statements |
|
|
ª |
|
BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS a comparative analysis of business segment results for the
three fiscal years presented in our consolidated financial statements |
|
|
ª |
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES a year-over-year comparative analysis of cash flows
and capital resources for the three fiscal years presented in our consolidated financial
statements |
|
|
ª |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION - analysis of significant changes in our financial position |
OUR BUSINESS
International Game Technology is a global company specializing in the design, development,
manufacturing, distribution and sales of computerized gaming machines and systems products. We
strive to maintain a diverse portfolio of gaming products that span a wide range of categories and
target customer markets with a variety of games, platforms and systems offered across gaming
jurisdictions worldwide.
We had annual revenues of $2.4 billion in fiscal 2005. We derive our revenues in two ways, either
from the sale (product sales) or placement (gaming operations) of our gaming products, services
and/or intellectual property. Operating results reviewed by our chief decision makers encompass
all revenue sources within each geographical customer region. We currently view our business
segments in two primary operating divisions, each incorporating all types of revenues:
|
ª |
|
The North America Division, encompasses our operations in the US and Canada, including
the IGT Systems group |
|
|
ª |
|
The International Division oversees our efforts abroad in Asia, Australia, New
Zealand, Europe, Japan, Latin America, Russia, South Africa, and the UK |
Additionally, our Corporate Division administers certain unallocated income and expenses related to
company-wide initiatives. See the BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS below and Note 18 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional segment information and financial results.
OUR FOCUS
Product Demand
Demand for our products is driven principally by:
|
ª |
|
technological innovations that create new, more sophisticated games and/or customer cost savings |
|
|
ª |
|
new or expanding gaming properties |
|
|
ª |
|
establishment or expansion of legalized gaming jurisdictions |
|
|
ª |
|
entertainment value to the player |
|
|
ª |
|
manufacturers reputation and reliability |
27
Following several consecutive years of record growth, largely related to the TITO replacement
cycle, fiscal 2005 was a transitional year. At the end of the current fiscal year, we estimate
there were approximately 175,000 total machines that remained unconverted in the marketplace. As
we move into fiscal 2006 and beyond the number of replacement units that are sold as a direct
result of TITO are anticipated to further decline. We expect that future replacement sales will be
driven more by customer desire to update their floor with new games and technology, rather than to
replace non-TITO machines. We anticipate an acceleration of this trend as we transition to SB
technology.
Offsetting the decline in North America machine demand, we anticipate growing contributions from
international operations, as well as increased non-machine sales, in part, enabled by our
significant share of total gaming devices currently installed on casino floors. Non-machine sales
include systems, parts, conversions, and royalties or licensing fees.
Notwithstanding these factors, we remain dependent upon gaming market expansion for growth.
Expansion of new markets has been slower to materialize than we previously expected due to delays
in legislative actions and/or regulatory approvals. Our business strategies remain focused on:
|
ª |
|
the development and expansion of our product offerings |
|
|
ª |
|
capitalizing on new and expanding market opportunities |
|
|
ª |
|
gaining access to important intellectual property |
|
|
ª |
|
strategic acquisitions and alliances to enable development of leading gaming technology |
|
|
ª |
|
ensuring access to new distribution channels |
Product Development
Our business model is the creation of game content and the delivery to consumers via our
platforms and systems. We are a prominent designer of games, platforms and systems for the gaming
industry. We accomplish this by anticipating consumer needs, responding to feedback and marketing
trends, and pioneering innovative gaming machines and reliable systems solutions. Our product
development efforts are supported by a considerable emphasis and investment in research and
development, which we expect will enable us to maintain a leadership position in the industry.
We continue to expand our for sale game library emphasizing development of games to address
changing consumer preferences and other market trends. We strive to develop games that incorporate
innovative and entertaining graphics and appealing sound. We added themes for spinning reel, video
poker and incorporated the popular multi-line multi-coin configuration to our video reels. Fiscal
2005 top selling video themes included:
|
ª |
|
Carnival of Mystery Multiway |
|
|
ª |
|
Alien® |
|
|
ª |
|
Mystical Mermaid® |
We anticipate continued installations into our casino market gaming operations installed base
through new video game introductions. We continually add innovation and enhanced player appeal to
our proprietary games. This includes introducing new multi level progressives games in addition to
new games and enhancements to our flagship themes such as Wheel of Fortune®, Megabucks®, and The
Price is Right®. During fiscal 2005, we introduced and placed new units of:
|
ª |
|
Fort Knoxâ, a multi-level mystery progressive penny game |
|
|
ª |
|
Video Megabucksâ, a penny game on our AVPâ platform with a $10 million starting jackpot |
|
|
ª |
|
Star Warsä, offered with a $1 million fixed top award in a linked penny progressive configuration |
Demand for these new game themes remains strong and we continue to observe high levels of customer
acceptance. We also maintain our strategy to improve gaming operations revenues by managing the
types of games and jurisdictions where games are placed.
To date, we have introduced a number of casino-wide integrated products that enhance the players
gaming experience and provide operational efficiencies for our customers. We are now leveraging
off this experience and our CDS technology to move forward in developing gaming products of the
future that incorporate innovative features, including server based gaming. We continue to make
progress with our server-based gaming initiatives and have commenced the regulatory approval
process and anticipate the start of commercial field trials in the near future. As the market
shifts toward a more system centric gaming environment, we expect a greater portion of our business
will come from non-machine revenues.
28
During the current fiscal year, we entered into a worldwide product integration agreement with PGIC
and SMI to develop a comprehensive, automated table management system known as the ITSÔ,
combining complementary capabilities, technologies, and resources of the three companies. A
well-implemented casino management and patron loyalty system offers strategic and competitive value
to a casinos slot operations. We view the extension of this technology into the table games area
as the next logical phase in the expansion of these products.
In August 2005, we acquired WagerWorks, a provider of internet gaming technology, content and
services to capitalize on the expanding internet gaming market. WW adheres to a strict compliance
policy designed to ensure that operators offer the companys products and services to end users in
a responsible manner. We anticipate this business combination will facilitate the distribution of
our game content across new channels and mediums, including the internet, mobile devices, and
interactive television.
Market Opportunities
We market our gaming products to legalized gaming jurisdictions around the world. While our
most significant markets are in North America, we continue to pursue additional opportunities in
international markets. The opportunities and challenges, and the extent of our successes, vary
across these jurisdictions.
We previously estimated that new North America and international markets would materialize during
fiscal 2006, but current market dynamics suggest that significant expansion could be delayed until
fiscal 2007. Although the timing has been delayed and remains uncertain, we do expect that
opportunities will eventually come from new jurisdictions and expansion of existing markets.
We continue to monitor expanding and emerging markets in North America, including California where
the potential for new and renegotiated tribal state compacts could spur further expansion. We
anticipate major expansion of legalized gambling previously forecasted for 2005 and early 2006 will
occur in late 2006 and 2007. With recent legislative action and voter referendums, we expect to
see new markets opening in both Florida and Pennsylvania in late calendar 2006. We also monitor
gaming legislation in potential new markets in the states of Arkansas, Kansas, Ohio, Maryland,
Massachusetts and Texas all showing interest in some form of legalized gaming.
Gaming expansion is ongoing in numerous CDS and Class II markets nationwide. Racino markets in
Maine, New York and Rhode Island continue to grow. New York continues to expand their program with
anticipated future openings in Yonkers and Aqueduct scheduled for late fiscal 2006 and early fiscal
2007. Our market share of lease operation machines in New York and Rhode Island grew in 2005
through a reallocation process based on our product performance.
The outlook for international market expansion continues to improve with opportunities in Asia,
Latin America, Russia, and the UK. We are concentrating our management and development resources
toward product localization, so we export a US manufactured product customized for local cultures.
With the prospects of new international jurisdictions we anticipate our international markets will
continue to grow in significance over the next several years and increase their share of overall
contribution.
Competition
The market for gaming machines and systems is intensely competitive principally through new
product development. We maintain a global competitive advantage because of our ability to:
|
ª |
|
offer a dynamic and diverse library of innovative and strong performing games |
|
|
ª |
|
develop and protect our extensive collection of intellectual properties |
|
|
ª |
|
provide the highest levels of customer service and support |
We also competitively benefit from our:
|
ª |
|
financial strength which allows us to aggressively research and develop new products,
as well as invest in strategic acquisitions and alliances |
|
|
ª |
|
extensive and well established infrastructure of sales, and manufacturing |
|
|
ª |
|
worldwide recognition and geographic diversity |
We currently hold a significant share of the total gaming devices on North America casino floors.
Within that population, our share in spinning reel and video poker machines remains stable, but we
are experiencing increased competitive pressure within the video spinning reel gaming machines
business. We expect to maintain a leading share of the total population of gaming devices
installed over the long-term, despite quarterly fluctuations that will occur from time to time.
29
The marketplace for recurring revenue units is competitive. We continue to proactively manage our
proprietary installed base in order to offer the strongest performing games placed on casino
floors. We expect our ability to develop exciting new themes should enable us to maintain a
leading market share.
Sales of our IGT Advantageä systems are successfully capturing market share
because of its value added technology offerings. With a number of significant new IGT
Advantageä systems contracts, we now have systems relationships with most major
gaming operators. At September 30, 2005, 510 IGT slot systems were installed worldwide connecting
approximately 272,000 machines, versus 403 systems connecting 246,000 machines at September 30,
2004, and 331 systems connecting 218,000 machines at September 30, 2003.
Capital Deployment
We generated substantial operating cash flows in fiscal 2005, which allowed us to reinvest in
our business through capital expenditures and business acquisitions, as well as generate returns to
our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. See the LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
section that follows for current share repurchase and dividend activity.
We enter into strategic business acquisitions and alliances as part of our ongoing effort to
create shareholder value designed to complement our internal resources. We consider businesses
that:
|
ª |
|
offer opportunities to diversify our geographic reach |
|
|
ª |
|
expand our product lines and customer base |
|
|
ª |
|
leverage our technological and manufacturing infrastructure to increase our rates of return |
In keeping with efforts to diversify and expand, we entered into the following strategic business
relationships and acquisitions during fiscal 2005:
|
ª |
|
the acquisition of WagerWorks, a provider of internet gaming technology, content and
services |
|
|
ª |
|
a collaboration with PGIC and SMI for the development and marketing of an automated
table management solution, known as Intelligent Table System |
|
|
ª |
|
the asset purchase of Friendly Matrix, with several products that we anticipate will
enhance functionality in our IGT Advantageä systems |
|
|
ª |
|
the asset purchase of Hi-Tech, our former distributor and supplier of gaming equipment
and services in Canada |
We anticipate these business relationships and acquisitions will facilitate incremental future
growth and eventual economies of scale, although they were not material and are not expected to
produce near-term earnings accretion. Including amortization of intangibles and in-process R&D,
WagerWorks reduced diluted EPS by approximately $0.01 in fiscal 2005 and is expected to be
approximately $0.02 dilutive in fiscal 2006. See Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional financial details of the acquisitions.
Hurricane Impact
We suffered damages and losses to our US gulf coast operations in the wake of hurricanes
Katrina in August 2005 and Rita in September 2005. Approximately 1,800 gaming operations machines
were affected, of which 700 were destroyed or rendered inoperable and 1,100 temporarily shut down, in part
due to WAP monitoring sites disabled for a short time.
At September 30, 2005, 750 of these gaming operations machines remain out of service.
No determination has been made as to the total amount or timing of insurance payments. We carry
comprehensive business interruption and property damage insurance. We are working closely with our
insurance carriers, claims adjustors, and consultants to ascertain the full amount of insurance
proceeds due to IGT as a result of the damages and losses suffered in the hurricanes. Business
interruption insurance recoveries for lost earnings and any property insurance reimbursements over
book value will be recorded when realized and all contingencies have been resolved, which may
result in future period fluctuations affecting comparability.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
With the adoption of SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment, in our quarter ending December 31, 2005,
we will recognize share-based compensation in our financial statements. Additionally, the SEC
issued SAB 107, Share-Based Payment, providing interpretive guidance on the interaction of SFAS
123R with existing SEC guidance. SAB 107 requires the classification of stock compensation expense
to the same financial statement line as cash compensation. We estimate the impact of adopting SFAS
123R will be approximately $0.02 dilutive to quarterly earnings in fiscal 2006 and will impact our
cost of product sales and gaming operations, related gross profits and margins, R&D, and SG&A
expenses. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding
recently issued accounting standards.
30
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the US. Accordingly, we are required to make estimates, judgments and
assumptions that we believe are reasonable based on our historical experience, contract terms,
observance of known trends in our company and the industry as a whole, and information available
from other outside sources. Our estimates affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual
results may differ from initial estimates.
Critical accounting estimates require IGTs management to make material subjective or complex
judgments about matters that are highly uncertain or variable to determine appropriate estimates
and assumptions to be used for recording certain financial transactions. These areas of our
accounting estimates are also the most sensitive to change from external factors. Senior
management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the
Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Jackpot Liabilities and Expenses
Changes to our estimates for jackpot liabilities and resulting expense primarily relate to
variations in the jackpot life cycle, volume of slot play, timing of jackpots won, and market
interest rate trends (see Item 7a, Market Risk). The initial
progressive meter liability on a new system is deferred and subsequently amortized to jackpot expense as
future contribution revenues are generated from slot play. Current and non-current portions of
jackpot liabilities, as well as jackpot expense, may also be impacted by changes in our estimates
and assumptions regarding the number of future winners who may elect lump sum payout.
Our jackpot liabilities totaled $705.8 million at September 30, 2005 and $719.3 million at
September 30, 2004. Jackpot expense totaled $258.5 million for fiscal 2005 and $292.0
million in fiscal 2004. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
accounting policies related to jackpot liabilities and expense.
Intangible Assets, including Goodwill and Prepaid Royalties
We review goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment annually, and whenever events
or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable or warrant a revision to the
estimated remaining useful life, in accordance with the SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Our forecasted future cash flows used to test the recoverability or determine the fair value of
intangibles are based on assumptions that are consistent with plans used to manage the underlying
business. Factors used in our evaluations of potential impairment and fair value require
significant judgments about respective estimated useful lives, risk rates, forecasted growth rates,
brand history, expected market growth, competitive environment, market share, future business
prospects and success of our products. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially
affect the determination of recoverability or fair value. While we believe that our estimates of
future revenues and cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions could materially affect our
assessment of useful lives, recoverability and fair values.
Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of
reporting units, allocation of related goodwill, assignment of corporate shared assets and
liabilities to reporting units, and determination of the fair value of each reporting unit. We
determine the fair value of our reporting units using the discounted cash flow method, and compared
the implied valuation multiples to a group of guideline public companies under the Market approach
to test the reasonableness of the discounted cash flow results.
Our goodwill and intangible assets totaled $1.4 billion at September 30, 2005 and $1.3 billion at
September 30, 2004. If the estimated fair value or useful lives of our intangible assets were to
decrease, the most significant impact would be an increase to amortization expense and/or
impairment, thereby decreasing our results of operations. We recorded no goodwill impairment
charges in fiscal years 2005, 2004 or 2003.
We also regularly evaluate the estimated future benefit of prepaid royalties, as well as minimum
commitments not yet paid, to determine amounts unlikely to be realized from forecasted sales or
placements of our games. If actual or revised forecasts fall below the initial estimate, then we
may need to revise the remaining useful life and/or record additional charges. The carrying value
of our prepaid and deferred royalties totaled $99.4 million at September 30, 2005 and $130.1
million at September 30, 2004.
31
Income Taxes
Determination of the appropriate amount and classification of income taxes is dependent on
several factors, including estimates of the timing and probability of realization of deferred
income taxes and the timing of income tax payments. We adjust deferred taxes based on the changes
in the difference between the book and tax basis of our assets and liabilities, measured by future
tax rates we estimate will be applicable when these differences are expected to reverse. This
process involves estimating our current tax position in each federal, state, and foreign
jurisdiction, as well as making judgments as to whether our taxable income in future periods will
be sufficient to fully recover any deferred tax assets. We establish a valuation allowance to the
extent recovery of deferred tax assets is not likely based on our estimation of future taxable
income in each jurisdiction.
The calculation of our tax liabilities also involves dealing with uncertainties in the application
of complex tax regulations. We recognize potential tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit
issues in the US and other jurisdictions based on our estimate of the extent to which additional
taxes will be due. If payment of these amounts proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of
liabilities could result in the recognition of a future tax benefit. If our tax liabilities are
understated, a charge to our tax provision would result. Changes in current tax laws, enacted tax
rates, geographic mix or the estimated level of annual taxable income could change our valuation of
deferred tax assets and liabilities, which in turn impacts our effective tax rate and tax
provision.
Our net deferred tax assets totaled $93.2 million at September 30, 2005 and $85.0 million at
September 30, 2004. Our accrued income taxes totaled $14.5 million at September 30, 2005 and $7.5
million at September 30, 2004.
Bad Debt Expense
We analyze historical collection trends, customer concentrations and creditworthiness,
economic trends and anticipated changes in customer payment patterns when evaluating the adequacy
of our allowance for doubtful accounts for specific and general risks. Changes in our assumptions
and estimates could change our estimated provision for bad debt, thereby impacting our operating
income. Our allowances for doubtful accounts, notes, and contracts receivable totaled $63.2
million at September 30, 2005 and $68.5 million at September 30, 2004.
Inventory and Gaming Operations Equipment
The determination of obsolete or excess inventory requires us to estimate the future demand
for our products within specific time horizons, generally, one year or less. If we experience a
significant unexpected decrease in demand for our products or a higher occurrence of inventory
obsolescence because of changes in technology or customer requirements, we could be required to
increase our inventory provisions. Inventory management remains an area of focus as we balance
the need to maintain strategic inventory levels to ensure competitive lead times versus the risk
of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and customer requirements. Our
inventories totaled $142.3 million at September 30, 2005 and $165.6 million at September 30, 2004.
We are also required to estimate salvage values and useful lives for our gaming operations
equipment. Trends in market demand and technological obsolescence may require us to record
additional asset charges, which would have a negative impact on gross profit. In fiscal 2005, our
assessment of estimated salvage values resulted in adjustments due to expected future releases of
more advanced cabinet and game designs. We recorded $41.6 million or $26.6 million after-tax to
cost of gaming operations related to technological obsolescence and salvage value adjustments in
fiscal 2005.
32
CONSOLIDATED
OPERATING RESULTS A Year Over Year Comparative Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
05 vs 04 |
|
04 vs 03 |
(In millions, except
units, ASP, ARPU, ARDU & EPS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,379.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,484.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,128.1 |
|
|
$ |
(105.3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
$ |
356.6 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
1,190.7 |
|
|
|
1,319.2 |
|
|
|
1,094.8 |
|
|
|
(128.5 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
224.4 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
(3 |
) pp |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
663.7 |
|
|
$ |
814.3 |
|
|
$ |
665.9 |
|
|
$ |
(150.6 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
%) |
|
$ |
148.4 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
(5 |
) pp |
|
|
(15 |
%) |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
436.5 |
|
|
$ |
429.8 |
|
|
$ |
375.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
54.5 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.9 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
(58.9 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
282 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
436.5 |
|
|
|
488.7 |
|
|
|
390.7 |
|
|
|
(52.2 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
275 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machines |
|
$ |
867.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,065.3 |
|
|
$ |
888.8 |
|
|
$ |
(197.4 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
%) |
|
$ |
176.5 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Systems, parts and conversions |
|
|
313.0 |
|
|
|
256.0 |
|
|
|
179.8 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
Total product sales |
|
|
1,180.9 |
|
|
|
1,321.3 |
|
|
|
1,068.6 |
|
|
|
(140.4 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
252.7 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
576.6 |
|
|
$ |
690.1 |
|
|
$ |
523.1 |
|
|
$ |
(113.5 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
%) |
|
$ |
167.0 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
(3 |
) pp |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
3 |
pp |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units sold |
|
|
141,900 |
|
|
|
159,200 |
|
|
|
134,800 |
|
|
|
(17,300 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
24,400 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
ASP |
|
$ |
6,100 |
|
|
$ |
6,700 |
|
|
$ |
6,600 |
|
|
$ |
(600 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
ARPU |
|
|
8,300 |
|
|
|
8,300 |
|
|
|
7,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,198.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,163.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,059.5 |
|
|
$ |
35.1 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
103.9 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
614.1 |
|
|
|
629.1 |
|
|
|
571.7 |
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
(3 |
) pp |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installed base units |
|
|
38,800 |
|
|
|
37,200 |
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
ARDU |
|
$ |
87.00 |
|
|
$ |
88.00 |
|
|
$ |
88.00 |
|
|
$ |
(1.00 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005 vs Fiscal 2004
Fiscal 2005 income and EPS from continuing operations grew slightly despite declining product sales
volumes in the North America division. Our consolidated results include record international
revenues and shipments as a result of the success of the two Japanese pachisuro games released in
the current fiscal year and a strong mix of premium products and parts sales in Australia.
Additionally, a favorable mix of revenues from systems, parts and game theme conversions and
increased gaming operations revenues contributed to current year results. Improved international
sales demonstrate our geographic diversity and has compensated for the slowing replacement demand
in North America.
Improved operating cash flows enabled us to continue our capital deployment strategy of returning
value to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. In fiscal 2005 we declared cash
dividends of $0.485 per share and repurchased 12.8 million shares.
Significant items affecting comparability of income from continuing operations for the fiscal years included:
|
ª |
|
the current year salvage value adjustments and technological obsolescence charges of $26.6 million, after-tax |
|
|
ª |
|
the negative impact to earnings from hurricanes Katrina and Rita consisting of
approximately $3.2 million, after-tax, of hurricane related expenses and $6.3 million,
after-tax, in lost business activity in fiscal 2005 |
|
|
ª |
|
$6.7 million after-tax for severance costs incurred in the current fiscal year
associated with several operational reorganization initiatives |
|
|
ª |
|
additional interest income of $6.0 million after-tax in the current year, related to
financing fees realized on early loan repayments |
|
|
ª |
|
the prior year loss on early redemption of our senior notes due May 2009 totaling $77.0
million, after-tax |
|
|
ª |
|
the prior year income tax provisions reduction of $13.9 million, primarily due to
utilization of foreign income tax credits |
|
|
ª |
|
the additional week in the prior year related to our 52/53-week fiscal year, primarily
affecting gaming operations and operating expenses |
33
We incurred considerable damages to our US gulf coast operations as a result of hurricanes Katrina
and Rita in August and September 2005. The subsequent closure of gulf coast casinos negatively
impacted our operating income results by approximately $14.9 million, pre-tax, comprised of a $9.4
million reduction in gross profit due to lost business activity, $2.8 million for the carrying
value of gaming operations assets destroyed, net of minimum insurance recoveries and $2.7 million
in additional operating expenses. These charges reduced diluted EPS by approximately $0.026.
Future lost earnings will vary depending on the number of machines that remain out of service and
the staggered pace of casino property re-openings. No determination has been made as to the total
amount or timing of insurance payments. Business interruption insurance recoveries for lost
earnings and any property insurance reimbursements over book value will be recorded when realized
and all contingencies have been resolved, which may result in future period fluctuations affecting
comparability.
See Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning the prior
year discontinued operations related to certain Anchor operations divested subsequent to
acquisition.
Consolidated product sales in fiscal 2005 were and continue to be adversely affected by the
slowdown in demand for TITO related replacement machines, as well as fewer new marketplace
opportunities. ASPs declined in the current fiscal year due to a higher mix of Japans pachisuro
machines, which carry lower sales prices and gross margins. Additionally, the allocation of fixed
costs across lower domestic sales volumes also contributed to the decrease in consolidated gross
margins in the current fiscal year. We estimate our consolidated product sales gross margin will
fluctuate between 47% and 51% in fiscal 2006 depending on the geographical mix of product sales.
Consolidated gaming operations revenues grew in the current fiscal year primarily due to increases
in our installed base as well as increased play levels resulting from new game introductions and
removal of lower performing units. Gross margin in fiscal 2005 was negatively impacted by charges
recorded for technical obsolescence, including adjustments to salvage values, of certain gaming
operations assets in response to shifting market demand toward newer IGT products that incorporate
more innovative features. The decline in ARDU in the current year was primarily due to the
increase mix of lower yielding CDS and Class II lease operations units, partially offset by
increased play levels.
Additionally, we began the VIE consolidations in April 2004, causing the current year to include an
additional six months of VIE revenues and expenses, but no material impact to gross profit. We
expect our consolidated gaming operations gross margin will fluctuate between 54% and 56% for
fiscal 2006, depending on the jurisdictional mix and types of games placed, as well as movements in
interest rates and seasonality.
Fiscal 2004 vs Fiscal 2003
IGT achieved record financial results in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003, posting revenue
growth in both product sales and gaming operations.
The increase in worldwide product sales revenues and gross profit in fiscal 2004 over fiscal 2003 was attributed to:
|
ª |
|
higher volumes in both North America and international markets |
|
|
ª |
|
a favorable shift in product mix |
|
|
ª |
|
improved pricing realization |
|
|
ª |
|
contributions from Acres of $56.0 million in revenues and $32.6 million in gross profit |
Additionally, product sales gross profit and margin improved during fiscal 2004 as a result of
lower material costs coupled with operational efficiencies in our Reno manufacturing facility.
Consolidated gaming operations revenues and gross profit grew in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal
2003 primarily due to increases in our North America installed base and improvements in the game
placement mix leading to higher yields per game placed. One additional week in fiscal 2004 related
to the timing of our 52/53-week accounting year added approximately $19.9 million to revenues and
$11.1 million to gross profit.
Significant fiscal 2004 items affecting comparability of income from continuing operations in
fiscal 2004 versus fiscal 2003 included:
|
ª |
|
a loss on the early redemption of our senior notes due May 2009 totaling $77.0 million
after tax |
|
|
ª |
|
a reduction to our income tax provision primarily related to the utilization of
foreign income tax credits totaling $13.9 million |
34
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
05 vs 04 |
|
04 vs 03 |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
318.6 |
|
|
$ |
293.1 |
|
|
$ |
272.7 |
|
|
$ |
(25.5 |
) (9%) |
|
$ |
(20.4 |
) (7% ) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
|
64.3 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) (9%) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) (38%) |
Research and development |
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
129.3 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) (7%) |
|
|
(34.4 |
) (36%) |
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
99% |
|
|
(3.6 |
) (25%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
527.0 |
|
|
$ |
504.9 |
|
|
$ |
428.9 |
|
|
$ |
(22.1 |
) (4%) |
|
$ |
(76.0 |
) (18%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of revenues |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005 vs Fiscal 2004
Operating expenses increased in the current fiscal year primarily due to:
|
ª |
|
additional costs in several SG&A categories, including legal and compliance fees and
additional severance costs |
|
|
ª |
|
higher R&D costs to support our commitment to develop innovative games, platforms and
systems |
|
|
ª |
|
partially offset by reduced bad debt provisions required to maintain reserves, as a
result of a more favorable risk profile on outstanding receivables, better collections
than expected and lower domestic sales volumes |
During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we initiated several efficiency initiatives involving
international operations and a regional reorganization of our North America sales and service
groups. As a result, we recognized charges principally consisting of SG&A severance totaling $10.0
million in fiscal 2005.
Fiscal 2004 vs Fiscal 2003
Operating expenses for fiscal 2004 increased over fiscal 2003 primarily due to:
|
ª |
|
the inclusion of Acres which added $32.2 million in operating expenses, including $10.7
million in amortization expense on acquired intangibles |
|
|
ª |
|
our ongoing investment in R&D which included our entry into central determination markets |
|
|
ª |
|
higher international selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
ª |
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
Fiscal 2004 also included approximately $8.0 million in additional operating expenses as a result
of the extra week in the first quarter related to the timing of our 52/53-week accounting year.
Recoveries of Latin America receivables reduced bad debt expense in fiscal 2003.
Other Income (Expense) and Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
05 vs 04 |
|
|
04 vs 03 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
77.9 |
|
|
$ |
59.8 |
|
|
$ |
52.9 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(58.1 |
) |
|
|
(90.5 |
) |
|
|
(116.8 |
) |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Loss on redemption of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
127.9 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
(126.8 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Other |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
$ |
(160.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(67.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
244.7 |
|
|
$ |
223.7 |
|
|
$ |
223.3 |
|
|
$ |
(21.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax rate |
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
34.2 |
% |
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
(1.7 |
)pp |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
pp |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005 vs Fiscal 2004
Total other income (expense), net, improved in the current fiscal year as a result of losses on
early debt redemption of our 2009 and 2004 senior notes totaling $127.9 million included in fiscal
2004. The prior year early debt redemption also resulted in decreased interest expense in the
current fiscal year. Additionally, interest income in 2005 included $10.2 million in financing
fees realized on early loan repayments.
35
Interest income related to our WAP systems operations totaled $36.1 million in fiscal 2005, $29.8
million in fiscal 2004 and $25.7 million in fiscal 2003. Interest expense related to our WAP
systems operations totaled $31.3 million in fiscal 2005, $26.1 million in fiscal 2004 and $23.2
million in fiscal 2003.
Fiscal 2004 results included a $13.9 million reduction to the provision for income taxes primarily
due to the utilization of foreign income tax credits resulting from changes in the geographic mix
of annual taxable income. Excluding the $13.9 million reduction, our fiscal 2005 annual tax rate
decreased to 35.9% from 36.4% in fiscal 2004. We anticipate a range of 36% to 37% for our annual
tax rate in fiscal 2006, depending on the geographic mix of operating income.
Fiscal 2004 vs Fiscal 2003
Other expense, net, for fiscal 2004 increased over 2003 due to a pretax loss of $127.9 million on
the early redemption of our 2009 and 2004 senior notes, partially offset by pretax interest savings
of $18.8 million.
BUSINESS
SEGMENT RESULTS A Year Over Year Comparative Analysis
Operating income for each division below reflects applicable operating expenses. See Note 18
of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our business
segments.
North America Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
05 vs 04 |
|
04 vs 03 |
(In millions, except units, ASP & ARPU) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,878.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,137.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,890.1 |
|
|
$ |
(258.2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
%) |
|
$ |
247.0 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
972.4 |
|
|
|
1,153.2 |
|
|
|
985.3 |
|
|
|
(180.8 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
%) |
|
|
167.9 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
(2 |
) pp |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
639.1 |
|
|
$ |
842.9 |
|
|
$ |
722.1 |
|
|
$ |
(203.8 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
%) |
|
$ |
120.8 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
(5 |
) pp |
|
|
(13 |
%) |
|
1 |
pp |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machines |
|
$ |
456.9 |
|
|
$ |
777.7 |
|
|
$ |
691.5 |
|
|
$ |
(320.8 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
%) |
|
$ |
86.2 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Systems, parts and conversions |
|
|
252.0 |
|
|
|
213.4 |
|
|
|
151.4 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
62.0 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
Total product sales |
|
|
708.9 |
|
|
|
991.1 |
|
|
|
842.9 |
|
|
|
(282.2 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
%) |
|
|
148.2 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
380.3 |
|
|
$ |
538.2 |
|
|
$ |
422.7 |
|
|
|
(157.9 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
%) |
|
|
115.5 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
pp |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
Units sold |
|
|
50,500 |
|
|
|
92,500 |
|
|
|
83,900 |
|
|
|
(42,000 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
%) |
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
ASP |
|
$ |
9,100 |
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
8,200 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
ARPU |
|
|
14,100 |
|
|
|
10,700 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,170.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,146.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,047.2 |
|
|
$ |
24.0 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
98.8 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
592.1 |
|
|
|
615.0 |
|
|
|
562.6 |
|
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
(3 |
) pp |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installed base units |
|
|
37,300 |
|
|
|
36,400 |
|
|
|
33,200 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Fiscal 2005 vs Fiscal 2004
North America machine sales were down in the current fiscal year as a result of lower replacement
demand and fewer new market opportunities. The most recent replacement cycle that arose from the
demand for cashless enabled gaming machines continues to slow and as a result this demand remained
below fiscal 2004 levels.
Despite lower machine volumes in the current fiscal year we maintained our product sales gross
margins and improved ARPUs as a result of:
|
ª |
|
increased pricing realization for machines and parts |
|
|
ª |
|
a more favorable mix of systems and game theme conversions |
|
|
ª |
|
additional intellectual property revenues |
We anticipate North America product sales gross profit margins to run approximately 54% to 56% in
fiscal 2006, on the continued strength of stronger price realization and a favorable mix of
non-machine related revenues.
36
Gaming operations revenues increased in the current fiscal year despite the interruption of
gulf coast business activity in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Revenue growth can be
attributed to:
|
ª |
|
growth in our installed base |
|
|
ª |
|
increased play levels ensuing from new game introductions and removal of lower performing units |
|
|
ª |
|
VIE consolidations included for twelve months in the current year versus six months in the prior year |
The additional six months of VIE revenues of $23.2 million in the current fiscal year was offset by
the extra week which contributed revenues of approximately $19.9 million in fiscal 2004.
The decrease in gaming operations gross profit in the current fiscal year was primarily due to:
|
ª |
|
technological obsolescence charges, including adjustments to salvage values, related to
certain gaming operations assets resulting from the transition in demand toward our newer,
more innovative products |
|
|
ª |
|
the extra week which added gross profit of approximately $11.1 million in fiscal 2004 |
|
|
ª |
|
partially offset by increased play levels ensuing from new game introductions and
removal of lower performing units |
The decline in gaming operations gross margins was also due to the consolidation of our VIEs that
commenced in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and increases in the installed base of lower yielding
lease operations and CDS/Class II units.
The growth in our installed base of proprietary games was primarily related to additional placements in:
|
ª |
|
casino operation markets in Alabama, California, Florida and Washington |
|
|
ª |
|
lease operation markets in New York, Rhode Island, and Delaware |
While growth in our installed base is
dependent on gaming industry expansion, we continually focus on strategies to improve yields,
centered on managing the:
|
ª |
|
types of games and jurisdictions
|
|
|
ª |
|
replacement of underperforming games with higher yielding games
|
|
|
ª |
|
pace of new game introductions
|
|
|
ª |
|
size of initial progressive jackpots
|
We anticipate our North America gaming operations
gross margin will fluctuate between 54% and 57% for fiscal 2006, depending on fluctuations in the:
|
ª |
|
mix of systems and games placed
|
|
|
ª |
|
volume of slot play and timing of jackpot hits
|
|
|
ª |
|
market interest rate trends
|
Fiscal 2004 vs Fiscal 2003
Fiscal 2004 North America product sales revenues, ARPUs and gross profit improved over fiscal 2003 due to:
|
ª |
|
increased replacement units |
|
|
ª |
|
increased higher-margin gaming systems related revenues, largely related to Acres,
which added $56.0 million in revenues and $32.6 million in gross profit |
|
|
ª |
|
stronger pricing realization for machines and parts, including theme conversions and
retrofits |
Additionally, North America product sales gross profit and margin also increased during fiscal 2004
as a result of lower material costs coupled with operational efficiencies due to higher volumes.
Total units shipped in fiscal 2004 increased over 2003 as a result of:
|
ª |
|
continued implementation of our EZ Pay TITO technology |
|
|
ª |
|
our extensive game theme library spanning spinning reel, video reel and video poker product lines |
|
|
ª |
|
large shipments in Nevada, Atlantic City and eastern region casinos, including 13,700
units to multiple Harrahs properties under existing purchase agreements |
These unit increases were partially offset by fewer units shipped into the Canadian provinces of
Quebec and Saskatchewan.
Fiscal 2004 North America gaming operations revenues and gross profit increased over fiscal 2003 as a result of:
|
ª |
|
growth in our installed base |
|
|
ª |
|
improvements in our game placement mix toward more WAP and instant winner games which
carry better yields |
|
|
ª |
|
increased play levels on WAP games across the majority of the North America gaming
markets, resulting from new game introductions and a more favorable jurisdictional mix |
37
Our installed base grew in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003 as a result of:
|
ª |
|
entry into several new markets including New York, Oklahoma, Alabama and Florida |
|
|
ª |
|
growth in the casino market due to placements across various Class II and Class III Native American markets |
|
|
ª |
|
additional lease operation units placed, largely related to the commencement of
operations at four racetracks in New York, as well as increased placements in Rhode Island
and Delaware |
The VIE consolidations increased revenues and expenses for the last six months of fiscal 2004 by
$23.8 million and reduced quarterly gross margin by approximately 2 pp. The VIE consolidations had
no material impact on gross profit dollars or net income.
Additionally, the extra week in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 contributed approximately $19.9
million in revenues and $11.1 million in gross profit.
International Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
05 vs 04 |
|
04 vs 03 |
(In millions, except units, ASP & ARPU) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
500.5 |
|
|
$ |
347.6 |
|
|
$ |
238.0 |
|
|
$ |
152.9 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
$ |
109.6 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
218.3 |
|
|
|
166.0 |
|
|
|
109.5 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)pp |
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
115.0 |
|
|
$ |
81.2 |
|
|
$ |
50.0 |
|
|
$ |
33.8 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machines |
|
$ |
411.0 |
|
|
$ |
287.6 |
|
|
$ |
197.3 |
|
|
$ |
123.4 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
$ |
90.3 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Systems, parts and conversions |
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
Total product sales |
|
|
472.0 |
|
|
|
330.2 |
|
|
|
225.7 |
|
|
|
141.8 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
196.3 |
|
|
$ |
151.9 |
|
|
$ |
100.4 |
|
|
$ |
44.4 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
$ |
51.5 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)pp |
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
1 |
pp |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units sold |
|
|
91,400 |
|
|
|
66,700 |
|
|
|
50,900 |
|
|
|
24,700 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
15,800 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
ASP |
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
4,300 |
|
|
$ |
3,900 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
ARPU |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
28.5 |
|
|
$ |
17.4 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
Installed base units |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005 vs Fiscal 2004
Revenues and gross profit improved in the current fiscal year primarily due to:
|
ª |
|
the current year success of The
TerminatorTM and Winning PostTM pachisuro games in
Japan, which combined sold 48,100 units versus 18,000
NobunagaTM units in the prior year |
|
|
ª |
|
strong mix of premium products and parts sales in Australia |
|
|
ª |
|
increased casino market sales in Europe and South Africa |
|
|
ª |
|
increased machine and systems sales in Latin America |
|
|
ª |
|
favorable foreign exchange |
|
|
ª |
|
increase in gaming operations installed base |
The decline in product sales gross margins in the current fiscal year was primarily due to a
greater volume of lower margin pachisuro games. The increase in international ARPU for the current
year was predominately due to:
|
ª |
|
increased price realization |
|
|
ª |
|
a more favorable mix of systems and other non-machine revenues |
|
|
ª |
|
favorable foreign exchange |
The TerminatorTM, released in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, was our most successful Japan game
model to date selling 29,600 units. Winning PostTM was released in the fourth quarter of 2005 and
sold 18,500 units in fiscal 2005. Although our recent level of
success with The TerminatorTM may or
may not be repeated, this unique and cyclical market is comprised of over 1.8 million machines, of
which about half are replaced annually.
38
Successes in Japan can contribute significantly to our gross profit and operating income, but these
lower priced pachisuro games reduce gross margin. We anticipate international margins will
continue to fluctuate depending upon the geographic mix of product sales.
During fiscal 2005, we established an office in Mexico with 500 initial placements of video bingo
games commencing a significant breakthrough in international lease operations. We also set up an
office in Macau to service anticipated growth projected in Asia over the next few years. We
anticipate our international markets will continue to grow in significance over the next several
years and increase their share of overall contribution.
Fiscal 2004 vs Fiscal 2003
Fiscal 2004 international product sales revenues, ARPU, gross profit and margin increased compared
to fiscal 2003 primarily due to:
|
ª |
|
Japan shipments of 18,000 units related to the success of
NobunagaTM pachisuro game |
|
|
ª |
|
increased sales in Latin America and the European casino markets |
|
|
ª |
|
favorable foreign currency exchange rates |
|
|
ª |
|
greater mix of higher margin sales in casino markets |
|
|
ª |
|
higher conversions and parts sales in Australia |
International gaming operations revenues are generated primarily from stand alone recurring revenue
units. Fiscal 2004 international gaming operations revenues improved over fiscal 2003 primarily
due to increased play levels on increased machine placements in Europe and Latin America and
favorable foreign currency exchange rates.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital Resources
Our principal source of liquidity is cash generated from our operating activities allowing
us to reinvest in our business. Our sources of capital also include, but are not limited to, the
issuance of public or private placement debt, bank borrowings under our credit facility and the
issuance of equity securities. We expect that our available capital resources will be sufficient
to fund our current capital expenditures and operating requirements, payments for scheduled debt,
dividends, interest and income tax obligations.
Our working capital decreased to $219.6 million at September 30, 2005 from $949.7 million at
September 30, 2004, primarily as the result of the classification of our Debentures to current
liabilities. See Note 8 of our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our working capital statistics
for fiscal 2005 compared to the prior year included:
|
ª |
|
average days sales outstanding remained consistent with the prior year at 74 days |
|
|
ª |
|
inventory turns increased to 4.2 from 3.8 |
We estimate inventory turns will trend approximately 3.5 in fiscal 2006 depending on sales volume
and game operation units placed.
Cash Flows Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) |
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
05 vs 04 |
|
04 vs 03 |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
$ |
726.4 |
|
|
$ |
623.6 |
|
|
$ |
408.7 |
|
|
$ |
102.8 |
|
|
$ |
214.9 |
|
Investing |
|
|
(215.8 |
) |
|
|
364.8 |
|
|
|
(597.5 |
) |
|
|
(580.6 |
) |
|
|
962.3 |
|
Financing |
|
|
(525.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,121.7 |
) |
|
|
420.7 |
|
|
|
596.1 |
|
|
|
(1,542.4 |
) |
Cash Flows From Operations
Fluctuations in net cash flows from operations for the current fiscal year were primarily related to:
|
ª |
|
additional cash used in the prior year to extend exclusive rights to licensed properties |
|
|
ª |
|
higher interest payments in the prior year on our senior notes subsequently redeemed |
|
|
ª |
|
timing of receivable collections |
|
|
ª |
|
payments to jackpot winners in excess of collections to fund jackpot liabilities |
|
|
ª |
|
lower inventory balances |
|
|
ª |
|
timing of income tax payments |
39
Fluctuations in net cash flows from operations in fiscal 2004 over fiscal 2003 were due to:
|
ª |
|
increased net income |
|
|
ª |
|
timing of receivable collections, including several customer payoffs of contract financings |
|
|
ª |
|
fiscal 2004 payments to extend exclusive rights to licensed properties |
|
|
ª |
|
fluctuations in payment timing for income taxes offset payment timing for accounts
payable and accrued liabilities |
Cash flows related to jackpot liabilities consist of collections to fund jackpots and payments to
winners for all WAP systems. Payments to winners include both periodic and lump sum payments.
Net cash flows related to jackpots represent timing differences between the growth in liabilities
for progressive jackpots and the actual payments to the winners during the period. Fluctuations
in net cash flows to fund jackpots reflect variations in the timing of the jackpot life cycles,
the pattern of winners payment elections, and the volume of slot play across all of our
progressive systems games. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information on how we account for jackpot liabilities.
The consolidation of the progressive systems trust VIEs in Iowa and New Jersey also contributed to
the increased cash flow volumes related to jackpot investments and liabilities in fiscal 2005 and
2004.
Cash Flows From Investing
The fluctuation in net investing cash flows in the current year was primarily attributed to:
|
ª |
|
prior year proceeds of $151.5 million from the sale of discontinued OES operations |
|
|
ª |
|
less cash provided from net investment securities proceeds |
|
|
ª |
|
receipt of $46.4 million in the prior year on the Pala note acquired with Anchor |
|
|
ª |
|
additional capital expenditures |
The fluctuation in net investing cash flows in fiscal 2004 versus fiscal 2003 was primarily related to:
|
ª |
|
less available cash in fiscal 2004 utilized for investment securities |
|
|
ª |
|
net cash used to acquire Acres of $109.7 million |
|
|
ª |
|
additional capital expenditures |
|
|
ª |
|
receipt of $46.4 million on the Pala note acquired with Anchor |
See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to certain
prior period amounts that have been reclassified to be consistent with the presentation used in the
current year, specifically with respect to auction rate securities and restricted cash. See Note 2
of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details related to current and prior year
acquisitions.
Jackpot annuity investments relate only to periodic payments to winners. Purchases of these
investments occur for the present value of a jackpot when the player wins and elects periodic
payments. Proceeds occur as the investments mature, in equal annual installments over the life of
the annuity.
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
05 vs 04 |
|
|
04 vs 03 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
|
$ |
48.9 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
Gaming operations equipment |
|
|
170.8 |
|
|
|
132.3 |
|
|
|
88.9 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
238.6 |
|
|
$ |
210.9 |
|
|
$ |
128.6 |
|
|
$ |
27.7 |
|
|
$ |
82.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal
2004, we began construction for our new Las Vegas campus, consolidating several
leased facilities, and expansion of our Reno facility. Spending related to these two projects
totaled $18.9 million in fiscal 2005 and $22.1 million in fiscal 2004. We plan to invest an
additional $77.4 million over the next two years in on-going construction for Las Vegas.
Our investment in gaming operations equipment increased in the current fiscal year due to growth in
our installed base and spending associated with the deployment of new products incorporating more
innovative features and our new penny progressive format. Increased spending in fiscal 2004 over
fiscal 2003 was due to
40
growth in our installed base and leased units, primarily in various Class III Native American
markets, as well as growing markets in New York, Alabama, Delaware and Florida. The introduction
of our AVP in fiscal 2004 also contributed to additional costs in gaming operations equipment.
The increased investment in intellectual property in fiscal 2004 was primarily related to
additional purchased patents for ongoing product development.
Cash Flows From Financing
Net financing cash flows improved in the current fiscal year primarily as a result of the prior
year redemption of senior notes, partially offset by additional current year share repurchases,
including our structured share repurchase, and dividends paid.
The fluctuation in net cash flows used by financing activities in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal
2003 was primarily the result of:
|
ª |
|
the early redemption of our senior notes due May 2004 and 2009 |
|
|
ª |
|
three additional quarters of dividend payments in fiscal 2004 |
|
|
ª |
|
proceeds of $200.0 million for a new term loan in fiscal 2004 versus the proceeds of
$575.0 million from the issuance of our debentures in fiscal 2003 |
|
|
ª |
|
reduced share repurchases in our fiscal 2004 |
Stock Repurchase Plan
Under the 1990 IGT common stock repurchase plan, as amended and adjusted for stock splits,
our remaining share repurchase authorization totaled 23.1 million at September 30, 2005. The stock
repurchase authorization is used to return value to our shareholders and reduce the number of
shares outstanding. The shares may be repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions, depending on market conditions and other factors. There is no expiration date
specified for this plan.
We repurchased 12.8 million shares on the open market for an aggregate price of $354.7 million in
fiscal 2005, 4.1 million shares for an aggregate price of $129.7 million in fiscal 2004, and 8.4
million shares for an aggregate price of $161.3 million in fiscal 2003. We
repurchased an additional 1.9 million
shares from the end of fiscal 2005 through December 9, 2005 for
an aggregate price of $54.6 million.
In September 2005, we prepaid $74.0 million in a structured share repurchase transaction
designed to settle in cash or IGT shares on November 15, 2005. Since our stock price was above
$27.40 per share on November 15, 2005, we received $77.8 million in cash. The results of this
transaction are reflected in shareholders equity. We may incorporate structured share
repurchase transactions in the future as part of our normal share repurchase strategy.
Credit Facilities and Indebtedness (See Note 8 of our Consolidated Financial Statements)
Senior Credit Facility
IGT entered into a $1.5 billion senior credit facility (credit facility) with a syndicate of banks
on July 1, 2004, replacing the previous credit facility of $260.0 million. The credit facility is
structured in two components both with five year maturities:
|
ª |
|
a $1.3 billion revolver, of which $4.2 million was reserved for letters of credit at
the end of the current fiscal year |
|
|
ª |
|
a $200.0 million term loan, funded on July 15, 2004 in conjunction with the early
redemption of our 2009 senior notes |
The interest rates applicable to the credit facility are based on our public credit ratings and
debt to capitalization ratio. Initially these rates were set at LIBOR plus 60.0 basis points (bps)
for both the revolver and the term loan. A facility fee of 15.0 bps applies to the entire credit
facility. The effective interest rate on the term loan equaled 4.21% at September 30, 2005, and
reset to 4.58% on October 18, 2005.
Financial covenants for the credit facility, as defined in the agreement, include a maximum
leverage ratio of 4:1 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3:1. The credit facility agreement
also includes certain restrictions on our ability to incur new indebtedness, issue guarantees, make
acquisitions or grant liens on our assets.
41
Absence of compliance with required covenant ratios would cause an event of default to occur. If
not cured, the default event could cause the entire outstanding borrowings under the credit
facility to become immediately due and payable, as well as trigger cross default provisions to
other debt issues. We continue to be in compliance with all applicable covenants at September 30,
2005.
We plan to amend and restate our existing $1.5 billion credit facility with a $2.0 billion
five-year credit facility on or before December 31, 2005. The proposed terms also include the
right to accept incremental commitments increasing the revolving credit facility by up to $500.0
million. The ultimate size and our completion of the new credit facility is subject to market and
customary closing conditions.
Foreign Credit Facilities
Our available foreign revolving credit facilities totaled $42.8 million at September 30, 2005 and
are subject to annual renewals in January and July.
Senior Convertible Debentures
In the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we issued $969.8 million principal amount at maturity of
zero-coupon senior convertible debentures due January 29, 2033 for gross proceeds of $575.0
million. Absent a yield adjustment, the Debentures have a yield to maturity of 1.75%. Because the
holders have the right to require IGT to redeem the bonds at accreted value on January 29, 2006,
the debentures are classified as a current liability. IGT also has the right to call the
debentures for redemption at accreted value anytime on or after January 29, 2006. If IGT calls the
debentures, holders will be notified at least 15 days, but not more than 60 days, prior to the
redemption date and will have the right to convert prior to redemption.
The yield adjustment feature may require IGT to pay contingent cash interest on the Debentures at
prevailing market rates to be determined during any six month period commencing on or after January
29, 2006, if the average closing sale prices of our common stock for specified measurement periods
is less than or equal to 60% of the accreted conversion price of the Debentures during such
specified periods.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
05 vs 04 |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,864.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,873.0 |
|
|
$ |
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,958.7 |
|
|
|
1,896.4 |
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,905.7 |
|
|
|
1,976.6 |
|
|
|
(70.9 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Total assets remained relatively flat for the current fiscal year. Changes in total
liabilities in fiscal 2005 primarily related to payment timing of accrued liabilities.
Total stockholders equity decreased during fiscal 2005 predominantly as the result of:
|
ª |
|
increased share repurchases |
|
|
ª |
|
dividends declared |
|
|
ª |
|
partially offset by net income and proceeds from employee stock plans |
42
Arrangements With Off-Balance Sheet Risks
In the normal course of business, we are a party to financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk such as performance bonds and other guarantees not reflected in our balance sheet. We
do not expect any material losses to result from these off-balance sheet arrangements and we are
not dependent on off-balance sheet financing arrangements to fund our operations. See Note 13 of
our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures of arrangements with off-balance
sheet risk.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes our minimum contractual obligations and commercial commitments
as of September 30, 2005 with the expected effect on our future liquidity and cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
208.8 |
|
Credit Facility interest |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Debentures, net |
|
|
602.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602.2 |
|
Previous winner payments |
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
440.1 |
|
|
|
767.3 |
|
Future winner payments |
|
|
135.1 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
176.3 |
|
Licenses, royalties & IP rights |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
Community reinvestment |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Marketing agreements |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Construction commitments |
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.4 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
Open purchase orders |
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138.5 |
|
Unfunded loans |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,064.4 |
|
|
$ |
138.9 |
|
|
$ |
82.1 |
|
|
$ |
271.2 |
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
466.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,087.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our credit facility represents the principal amount due at maturity. Credit facility interest
resets quarterly and is estimated using current rates. Our letters of credit are issued under our
credit facility line of credit to insure our payment to certain vendors and governmental agencies.
The Debentures are presented net of unamortized discount at September 30, 2005. Holders have the
right to require IGT to redeem the Debentures for an amount equal to their accreted value, plus
accrued and unpaid cash interest, if any, on January 29, 2006, 2008, 2013, 2018, 2023 and 2028.
The accreted value will be $605.6 million at January 29, 2006, $627.1 million at January 29, 2008,
and $969.8 million at maturity on January 29, 2033. See Note 8 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information related to long-term debt.
Winner payments represent the gross amounts due for jackpots. The timing and amount of expected
future winner payments are estimated based on historical patterns of winners lump sum payment
elections. We maintain cash and investments at sufficient levels to fund our jackpot liabilities
and winner payments. See Notes 1 and 10 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information related to jackpot liabilities.
Unconditional amounts payable for licenses, royalties, intellectual property and community
reinvestments were recorded as liabilities at September 30, 2005. Royalties contingent on future
game sales or placements are not included in the table above. Construction commitments relate to
construction projects for Las Vegas. See Note 9 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information regarding operating leases.
Unfunded loans represent amounts available under development financing arrangements with select
customers to finance new or expanding gaming facilities. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information regarding facility notes.
43
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We use derivative financial instruments to minimize our market risk exposure resulting from
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. The primary business objective of our
hedging program, as defined in our corporate risk management policy, is to minimize the impact of
transaction, remeasurement, and specified economic exposures to our net income and earnings per
share. The counter parties to these instruments are major commercial banks and we believe that
losses related to credit risk are remote. We are not party to leveraged derivatives and do not
hold or issue financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Foreign Currency Risk
We routinely use forward exchange contracts to hedge our net exposures, by currency, related to
our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional foreign currency of our
operations. In addition, from time to time, we may enter into forward exchange contracts to
establish with certainty the US dollar amount of future firm commitments denominated in a foreign
currency.
Hedging
At September 30, 2005, our net foreign currency exposure of $138.8 million related to our monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional currency was hedged with $127.2 million in
forward currency contracts. Our net foreign currency exposure of $53.1 million relative to our
monetary assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional currency was hedged with $43.8
million in forward contracts at September 30, 2004.
Given our foreign exchange position, a 10% adverse change in foreign exchange rates upon which
these foreign exchange contracts are based would result in exchange gains and losses. In all
material aspects, these exchange gains and losses would be fully offset by exchange gains and
losses on the underlying net monetary exposures for which the contracts are designated as hedges.
We do not expect material exchange rate gains and losses from unhedged foreign currency exposures.
Translation
As currency rates change, translation of our foreign currency functional businesses into US
dollars affects year-over-year comparability of equity. We do not generally hedge translation
risks because cash flows from our international operations are generally reinvested locally.
Changes in the currency exchange rates that would have the largest impact on translating our
international net assets included the Australian dollar, the British pound, the Japanese yen and
the Euro. We estimate that a 10% change in foreign exchange rates would have impacted reported
equity by approximately $5.0 million at September 30, 2005 versus $1.6 million at September 30,
2004. This increase is largely related to the acquisition of WagerWorks, Inc. This sensitivity
analysis disregards the possibility that rates can move in opposite directions and that gains from
one area may or may not be offset by losses from another area.
Interest Rate Risk
We estimate interest rate risk as the potential change in the fair value of our debt or earnings
resulting from a hypothetical 100 bps adverse change in interest rates.
Costs to fund jackpot liabilities
Fluctuations in prime, treasury and agency rates due to changes in market and other economic
conditions directly impact our costs to fund jackpots, and therefore our gross profit in gaming
operations. If interest rates decline, our costs increase, and correspondingly our gross profit
declines. We estimate that a hypothetical decline of 100 bps in interest rates would have reduced
our gross profit by approximately $24.2 million in fiscal year 2005 and $26.4 million in fiscal
2004. We do not currently manage this exposure with derivative financial instruments.
Convertible Debentures Price Risk
The fair value of our debentures is sensitive to changes in both our stock price and interest
rates. Assuming interest rates are held constant, we estimate a 10% decrease in our stock price
would have decreased the fair value of our convertible debentures by approximately $12.9 million at
September 30, 2005. Assuming a constant stock price, we estimate a 100 bps increase in interest
rates would have decreased the fair value of our convertible debentures by $1.5 million at
September 30, 2005. See Note 8 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
regarding certain put and call rights that will become effective of January 29, 2006.
44
Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
Index to Financial Statements |
|
Page |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
45
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of International Game Technology:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of International Game Technology and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of income, cash flows, and stockholders equity for each of the three years in the
period ended September 30, 2005. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement
schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and the financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of International Game Technology and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2005
and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended September 30, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such consolidated financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
as of September 30, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated December 12, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment of the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Reno, Nevada
December 12, 2005
46
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
1,180.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,321.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,068.6 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
1,198.5 |
|
|
|
1,163.4 |
|
|
|
1,059.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
2,379.4 |
|
|
|
2,484.7 |
|
|
|
2,128.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales |
|
|
604.3 |
|
|
|
631.2 |
|
|
|
545.5 |
|
Cost of gaming operations |
|
|
584.4 |
|
|
|
534.3 |
|
|
|
487.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
318.6 |
|
|
|
293.1 |
|
|
|
272.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
|
64.3 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
129.3 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and operating expenses |
|
|
1,715.7 |
|
|
|
1,670.4 |
|
|
|
1,462.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
663.7 |
|
|
|
814.3 |
|
|
|
665.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(58.1 |
) |
|
|
(90.5 |
) |
|
|
(116.8 |
) |
Loss on debt redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
(160.8 |
) |
|
|
(67.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before tax |
|
|
681.2 |
|
|
|
653.5 |
|
|
|
598.6 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
244.7 |
|
|
|
223.7 |
|
|
|
223.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
436.5 |
|
|
|
429.8 |
|
|
|
375.3 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax of $35.3 and $9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.9 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
436.5 |
|
|
$ |
488.7 |
|
|
$ |
390.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.485 |
|
|
$ |
0.420 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
343.7 |
|
|
|
346.8 |
|
|
|
344.0 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
370.2 |
|
|
|
376.3 |
|
|
|
366.7 |
|
See accompanying notes.
47
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions, except par value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
288.9 |
|
|
$ |
307.0 |
|
Investment securities, at market value |
|
|
268.3 |
|
|
|
317.0 |
|
Restricted cash and investments |
|
|
130.9 |
|
|
|
142.7 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $20.4 and $26.1 |
|
|
327.8 |
|
|
|
359.7 |
|
Current maturities of notes and contracts receivable, net |
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
142.3 |
|
|
|
165.6 |
|
Jackpot annuity investments |
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,437.2 |
|
|
|
1,509.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and contracts receivable, net |
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
|
87.3 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
385.2 |
|
|
|
329.1 |
|
Jackpot annuity investments |
|
|
469.4 |
|
|
|
468.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
286.3 |
|
|
|
258.2 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
1,090.9 |
|
|
|
1,035.6 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
135.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,864.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,873.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of notes payable |
|
$ |
611.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
96.7 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
Jackpot liabilities |
|
|
203.9 |
|
|
|
209.2 |
|
Accrued employee benefit plan liabilities |
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
183.9 |
|
|
|
153.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,217.6 |
|
|
|
560.0 |
|
Notes payable, net of current maturities |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
791.8 |
|
Non-current jackpot liabilities |
|
|
501.9 |
|
|
|
510.1 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,958.7 |
|
|
|
1,896.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $.00015625 par value; 1,280 shares
authorized; 712.8 and 708.0 shares issued |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,623.6 |
|
|
|
1,607.7 |
|
Treasury stock at cost: 374.6 and 361.9 shares |
|
|
(2,176.9 |
) |
|
|
(1,821.8 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,471.1 |
|
|
|
2,201.4 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,905.7 |
|
|
|
1,976.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,864.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,873.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
48
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
436.5 |
|
|
$ |
488.7 |
|
|
$ |
390.7 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization, and asset charges |
|
|
222.2 |
|
|
|
149.8 |
|
|
|
134.0 |
|
Debt discounts and deferred offering costs |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
Provision for inventory obsolescence |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
(Gain) loss on assets sold |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Loss on debt redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90.8 |
) |
|
|
13.9 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
excluding acquisitions and VIE consolidations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
(105.4 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
18.5 |
|
Jackpot liabilities |
|
|
(41.0 |
) |
|
|
(28.6 |
) |
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
Income taxes, net of employee stock plans |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
(20.1 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(30.9 |
) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
(48.6 |
) |
|
|
(30.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operations |
|
|
726.4 |
|
|
|
623.6 |
|
|
|
408.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(238.6 |
) |
|
|
(210.9 |
) |
|
|
(128.6 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Investment securities, proceeds (purchases), net |
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
|
458.5 |
|
|
|
(667.9 |
) |
Jackpot annuity investments, net |
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
Loans receivable cash advanced |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(24.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
Loans receivable payments received |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
Proceeds from assets sold |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Proceeds from discontinued operations sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151.5 |
|
|
|
155.1 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
(90.6 |
) |
|
|
(109.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing |
|
|
(215.8 |
) |
|
|
364.8 |
|
|
|
(597.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt repayments |
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
(982.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
Debt proceeds |
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
197.5 |
|
|
|
565.0 |
|
Debt redemption premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Employee stock plan proceeds |
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(165.8 |
) |
|
|
(138.9 |
) |
|
|
(25.8 |
) |
Share repurchases |
|
|
(354.7 |
) |
|
|
(129.8 |
) |
|
|
(161.3 |
) |
Structured share repurchase |
|
|
(74.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing |
|
|
(525.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,121.7 |
) |
|
|
420.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange rates effect on cash |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(133.4 |
) |
|
|
228.2 |
|
Beginning cash and equivalents |
|
|
307.0 |
|
|
|
440.4 |
|
|
|
212.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
288.9 |
|
|
$ |
307.0 |
|
|
$ |
440.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
49
Supplemental Cash Flows Information
Depreciation, amortization, and asset charges reflected in the cash flows statements includes
the amounts presented separately on the income statements, plus amounts classified as a component
of cost of product sales and cost of gaming operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
$ |
(656.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,529.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,591.8 |
) |
Proceeds from sales |
|
|
705.7 |
|
|
|
1,987.5 |
|
|
|
923.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds (purchases) |
|
$ |
49.7 |
|
|
$ |
458.5 |
|
|
$ |
(667.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackpot funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collections to fund jackpots |
|
$ |
242.1 |
|
|
$ |
279.9 |
|
|
$ |
257.8 |
|
Payments to winners |
|
|
(283.1 |
) |
|
|
(308.5 |
) |
|
|
(287.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in jackpot liabilities |
|
|
(41.0 |
) |
|
|
(28.6 |
) |
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackpot annuity purchases |
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
Jackpot annuity proceeds |
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in jackpot annuity investments |
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net jackpot funding cash flows |
|
$ |
(12.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
(48.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(48.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(30.8 |
) |
Gaming operations equipment |
|
|
(170.8 |
) |
|
|
(132.3 |
) |
|
|
(88.9 |
) |
Intellectual property |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(29.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
(238.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(210.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(128.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
73.9 |
|
|
$ |
81.1 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
218.2 |
|
|
|
228.0 |
|
|
|
250.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit of employee stock plans |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
Treasury stock acquired for stock awards exercised or forfeited |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Capital expenditure accruals |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets |
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
149.9 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Fair value of liabilities |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial VIE consolidations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
185.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
185.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
50
CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
|
708.0 |
|
|
|
703.3 |
|
|
|
696.7 |
|
Employee stock plans |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
|
712.8 |
|
|
|
708.0 |
|
|
|
703.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
1,607.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,537.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,451.4 |
|
Employee stock plans shares issued |
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
Tax benefit of employee stock plans |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Structured share repurchase |
|
|
(74.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
1,623.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,607.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,537.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
(1,821.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,691.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,530.4 |
) |
Treasury shares acquired |
|
|
(355.1 |
) |
|
|
(129.9 |
) |
|
|
(161.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
(2,176.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,821.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,691.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
(11.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.7 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
(11.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
2,201.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,858.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,528.3 |
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
(166.8 |
) |
|
|
(145.9 |
) |
|
|
(60.4 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
436.5 |
|
|
|
488.7 |
|
|
|
390.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
2,471.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,201.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,858.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.4 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
436.5 |
|
|
$ |
488.7 |
|
|
$ |
390.7 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
434.7 |
|
|
$ |
493.4 |
|
|
$ |
392.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
51
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
1. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the SEC and include all adjustments necessary to fairly present our consolidated results of
operations, financial position, and cash flows for each period presented.
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of International Game Technology and all
majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries and variable interest entities of which we are the
primary beneficiary. All appropriate inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
We account for investments in 50% or less owned joint ventures using the equity method.
Our fiscal year is reported on a 52/53-week period that ends on the Saturday nearest to September
30 each year. Similarly, our quarters end on the Saturday nearest to the last day of the quarter
end month. For simplicity, all fiscal periods are presented as ending on the calendar month end.
Consistent with this practice, the fiscal years ended October 1, 2005, October 2, 2004 and
September 27, 2003 are all presented as ended on September 30 of the relevant year. The results of
operations for fiscal 2005 and 2003 contain 52 weeks versus 53 weeks in fiscal 2004.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to be consistent with the presentation used in
the current fiscal year, specifically with respect to the presentation of restricted cash, and
auction rate securities in our balance sheets and cash flows statements.
Use of Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with US GAAP. Accordingly,
we are required to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based
on our historical experience, contract terms, observance of known trends in our company and the
industry as a whole, and information available from other outside sources. Our estimates affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. On a regular basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those
related to customer programs and incentives, revenue recognition, product returns, bad debts,
inventory obsolescence, investments, long-lived assets, jackpot liabilities, prepaid and deferred
royalties, income taxes, warranty obligations, long-term contracts, contingencies and litigation.
Actual results may differ from initial estimates.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when all of the following have been satisfied:
|
|
ª persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists |
|
|
|
ª the price to the customer is fixed and determinable |
|
|
|
ª delivery has occurred and any acceptance terms have been fulfilled |
|
|
|
ª no significant contractual obligations remain |
|
|
|
ª collection is reasonably assured |
Product Sales
Our product sales revenues are generated from the sale of gaming machines, systems, parts,
conversion kits, content fees, intellectual property royalty and license fees, equipment and
services. Revenues are reported net of incentive rebates or discounts. Revenues related to
customized R&D contracts are recognized as the related work is delivered. We recognize license fee
revenues from business affiliates over the term of the associated agreement unless the fee is in
exchange for products delivered or services performed that represent the culmination of a separate
earnings process. Amounts received prior to completing the earnings process are deferred until
revenue recognition criteria are met.
Our sales credit terms are predominately 90 days or less. In certain jurisdictions and in limited
circumstances, we may extend credit terms up to two years. We also grant extended payment terms
under contracts of sale secured by the related equipment sold, generally for terms of one to three
years with interest recognized at prevailing rates.
52
For sales arrangements with multiple deliverables, we apply the guidance from SOP 97-2, Software
Revenue Recognition, as amended, and EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.
Deliverables are divided into separate units of accounting if:
|
|
ª each item has value to the customer on a stand alone basis |
|
|
|
ª we have objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered items |
|
|
|
ª delivery of any undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in our control |
The majority of our multiple element contracts are for some combination of machines, systems
software, license fees and maintenance. The contracts separately state pricing for each
deliverable based on our standard price list (the price charged for the deliverable when it is sold
separately) less a specified discount. The terms of performance, cancellation, termination, or
refund provisions in our multiple element contracts are similar to those in a contract or sales
order for an individual stand alone deliverable. Each deliverable is accompanied by a fully
executed sales order signed by the customer and revenues are recognized when delivery has occurred.
Our services for initial installation, as well as standard warranty and technical support, are not
separately priced components of our sales arrangements and are included in our revenues when the
product is delivered. If the installation of the product is not considered inconsequential and
perfunctory, then we defer revenue recognition until the installation is complete.
License and/or warranty maintenance agreements with customer support terms that extend beyond the
standard period included in the sale of the product are recognized ratably over the term of the
service period. Revenues generated for additional training and education classes are recognized
when the services are performed. When software systems require significant customization specific
to the individual customer, we defer recognition of revenues until the software system product is
successfully installed, fully operational, and accepted by the customer.
Gaming Operations
Gaming operations revenues are generated from providing customers with our proprietary gaming
products, services, and/or intellectual properties under a variety of recurring revenue
arrangements, including:
|
|
ª WAP systems |
|
|
|
ª central determination systems |
|
|
|
ª stand alone participation and flat fee |
|
|
|
ª equipment leasing and rental |
|
|
|
ª online gaming solutions |
WAP systems entail a configuration of numerous electronically linked slot machines located in
multiple casino properties, connecting to an IGT central computer system via a network of
communications equipment. WAP systems games differ from stand alone units in that they build a
progressive jackpot with every wager until a player hits the top award winning combination. WAP
contribution revenues are recognized based on a percentage of coin-in generated by the game.
Participating casinos pay a percentage of the coin-in either directly to IGT or a trust for
services related to the design, assembly, installation, operation, maintenance, and marketing of
the WAP systems and to administer the progressive jackpot funding.
Unlike WAP systems where the game outcome is determined within the slot machine itself, central
determination systems determine and deliver game outcomes to the linked machines. CDS, stand
alone, and other equipment leasing or rentals are recognized based on our participation percentage
of the net win or on a flat fee basis with the passage of time.
Online gaming solutions encompass online casino gaming software and content licensing, as well as
back office operational support services. All online gaming solutions are provided under revenue
sharing arrangements based on net gaming revenues.
WAP Trust VIE Consolidations
In both Iowa and New Jersey, IGT licenses WAP systems to the trusts and casino members (trustees)
that are responsible for the funding of the progressive jackpots. In Iowa, all linked WAP systems
are operated under a single trust, administered by IGT, and IGT receives a fee equal to the net
profit of the trust. In New Jersey, each WAP system is operated under an individual trust,
administered by IGT or other representatives of the casino members, and IGT receives a flat fee per
machine per day.
53
As a result of the issuance of FIN 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, we were required to consolidate the progressive trusts as of March 31, 2004. Prior to
consolidation, we recognized revenues from the trusts based on the contractual fee arrangements.
Consolidated trust assets equal liabilities and relate primarily to jackpot funding. These VIE
consolidations increase gaming operations revenues and costs by approximately the same amount,
resulting in no material impact to gross profit or net income. Consolidated trust VIE assets
totaled $165.3 million at September 30, 2005 and $186.6 at September 30, 2004. Trust VIE
consolidations contributed revenues of $44.2 million in fiscal 2005 and $23.8 million during the
last half of fiscal 2004.
NJ gaming regulation changes permit IGT the opportunity to maintain direct responsibility for
progressive jackpot system operations, including the funding of future winner payments held under
the control of a separate trust administrator. Effective November 2005, IGT assumed responsibility
for future winner payments. The existing NJ trusts will continue the administration of past winner
payments and relieve IGT of any related obligations. With this change, we will no longer be
required to consolidate approximately $129 million in assets and liabilities of the existing NJ
trusts related to past winners. We anticipate no material impact to future consolidated gaming
operations revenues or expenses as a result of this deconsolidation.
Pro forma Stock Based Compensation Expense
As permitted by SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, we continued through fiscal 2005
to account for stock based compensation plans in accordance with APB 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, which determines the compensation cost of stock options issued for
non-variable plans like ours as the difference between the quoted market value at the measurement
date and the amount, if any, required to be paid by employees. Our stock based compensation plans
are predominantly plans where the option price is equal to or greater than the stock price would be
in an offer to all shareholders and therefore, no compensation cost is recorded. We do record
stock-based compensation for the intrinsic value of restricted stock awards and when terms of
outstanding unvested options are modified or converted in an acquisition.
The following pro forma financial information reflects the difference between stock compensation
costs charged to operations under the APB 25 intrinsic value method and pro forma stock
compensation costs that would have been recorded had the SFAS 123 fair value method been applied
to all awards granted, modified, or settled since the beginning of fiscal 1996, using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model. Option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions, and changes in the assumptions used can materially affect the fair value
estimate. The fiscal 2005 pro forma stock compensation includes the recapture of approximately
$3.3 million after-tax of previously recognized expense related to unvested options forfeited by
retiring key executives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts and assumptions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net income |
|
$ |
436.5 |
|
|
$ |
488.7 |
|
|
$ |
390.7 |
|
Reported stock compensation, net of tax |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Pro forma stock compensation, net of tax |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
(27.7 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
|
415.0 |
|
|
|
462.3 |
|
|
|
372.1 |
|
After-tax interest expense on convertible debentures |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted EPS numerator |
|
$ |
424.5 |
|
|
$ |
471.6 |
|
|
$ |
378.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options weighted average grant date fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share granted |
|
$ |
7.95 |
|
|
$ |
7.11 |
|
|
$ |
5.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates |
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
1.79 |
% |
Dividend yields |
|
|
1.57 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
0.24 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
Expected life (years) |
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
54
Advertising Costs
IGT expenses advertising costs as incurred, except long term outdoor billboards that are
capitalized and amortized over the contract life. Advertising expenses totaled $19.5 million in
fiscal 2005, $19.4 million in fiscal 2004 and $19.7 million in fiscal 2003.
Research and Development
Our products reach technological feasibility shortly before the products are released to
manufacturing and therefore R&D costs are expensed as incurred. Employee related costs associated
with product development are included in R&D costs. R&D performed for specific customers is
charged to cost of product sales when the related sale is recorded.
Earnings Per Share
We compute EPS using the weighted average number of common and potential shares outstanding. See
Note 12.
Cash and Equivalents
Cash and equivalents consist primarily of deposits held at major banks, commercial paper, and
other money market securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Restricted Cash and Investments
We are required by gaming regulations to maintain sufficient reserves in restricted accounts to be
used for the purpose of funding payments to progressive systems jackpot winners. The restricted
amounts (comprised of cash and short-term investments) are based primarily on the levels of the
progressive systems primary jackpot meters (those displayed to slot players) and vary by
jurisdiction. Compliance with restricted cash requirements is reported to the gaming authorities
in various jurisdictions.
Restricted cash of $78.4 million and investments of $64.3 million at September 2004 are now
presented separately. The net change in restricted cash is currently reflected as an increase in
investing cash flows rather than as a component of net change in cash on the cash flows statements
as previously presented.
Restricted cash provided from our initial VIE consolidations in fiscal 2004 was also reclassified,
reducing investing cash flows and net change in cash by $47.5 million, and included in supplemental
disclosures for non-cash fair value of assets. These reclassifications had no impact on operating
cash flows.
Investment Securities
Our investment securities are classified as available-for-sale and stated at market value.
Unrealized gains and losses, net of income tax effects, are reported as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income. Market value is determined by the most recently traded price of the
security at the balance sheet date. Net realized gains or losses are determined on the specific
identification cost method.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we determined it appropriate to classify our ARS as
short-term investments. Although ARS have an underlying long-term maturity, they are traded and
interest rates reset through a modified Dutch auction at predetermined short-term intervals,
usually 7, 28, or 35 days. We previously classified ARS as cash equivalents based on the period
from purchase to first auction date.
We reclassified ARS totaling $379.7 million (including restricted amount of $64.3 million) at
September 30, 2004 from cash equivalents to short-term investments. Additionally, we reclassified
ARS purchases of $1.5 billion and proceeds of $2.0 billion in fiscal 2004, increasing investing
cash flows, as well as net change in cash and equivalents, by $456.0 million. In fiscal 2003, we
reclassified ARS purchases of $1.6 billion and proceeds of $913.9 million, decreasing investing
cash flows by $677.9 million. During fiscal 2005, ARS purchases totaled $656.0 million, proceeds
totaled $705.7 million, and the ending balance totaled $330.0 million (including restricted amount
of $63.1 million). These reclassifications had no impact on operating cash flows.
Receivables
The carrying amount reflected in our consolidated balance sheet for receivables approximates fair
value.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts on our accounts, notes and contracts receivable
that we have deemed to have a high risk of collectibility. We analyze historical collection
trends, customer concentrations, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in
our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts.
We also evaluate specifically reserved notes for placement on non-interest-accrual status.
55
Equipment Financing Contracts
IGT grants extended payment terms to qualifying customers under contracts of sale. These contracts
are generally for terms of one to five years, with interest recognized at prevailing rates, and
secured by the related equipment sold.
Facility Notes
IGT provides development financing loans to select customers for new or expanding gaming
facilities, generally under terms of one to ten years with interest at prevailing rates. Certain
agreements may also include provisions for the facility to reserve a percentage of its floor space
for the placement of IGT proprietary games, which may be reduced if the machines do not meet
certain performance standards. These agreements may call for IGT to receive a portion of the net
win on these proprietary games as repayment for some or all of the amounts financed. Unfunded
development financing loans totaled $11.8 million at September 30, 2005.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market value. We
regularly assess inventory quantities on hand and record provisions for excess and obsolete
inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
69.8 |
|
|
$ |
84.5 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
67.9 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
142.3 |
|
|
$ |
165.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackpot Annuity Investments
These investments represent discounted qualifying US treasury or agency securities purchased
and held to maturity to fund annual jackpot payments due previous winners. We have both the intent
and ability to hold these investments to maturity and, therefore, classify them as
held-to-maturity. Accordingly, these investments are stated at cost, adjusted for interest
accretion over the term of the security. Many jurisdictions require regulatory approval for
liquidation of these annuity investments.
Property, Plant and Equipment
We depreciate our property, plant and equipment down to salvage value using the straight-line
method. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and improvements are capitalized.
Disposal gains or losses are included in other income and expense, except for charges related to
gaming operations equipment which are recorded to cost of gaming operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful lives |
|
September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
in years |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
20.7 |
|
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
|
102.4 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
30-40 |
|
Gaming operations equipment |
|
|
483.2 |
|
|
|
392.0 |
|
|
|
1-3 |
|
Manufacturing machinery and equipment |
|
|
220.1 |
|
|
|
206.5 |
|
|
|
2-15 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
lease term |
|
Construction in process |
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
876.2 |
|
|
|
742.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(491.0 |
) |
|
|
(413.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
385.2 |
|
|
$ |
329.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CIP included $25.1 million at September 30, 2005 and $22.1 million at September 2004 related
to new facilities under construction in Las Vegas and Reno. Capitalized interest relative to
these projects totaled $0.9 million at September 30, 2005. We reclassified $18.9 million of CIP
for the Reno expansion to buildings and equipment when it was placed in service during fiscal 2005. Estimated costs to complete projects under
construction totaled approximately $77.4 million at September 30, 2005.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
We amortize our finite lived intangible assets to reflect the pattern in which the economic
benefits of the assets will be consumed based on projected usage and revenues over one to 18 years.
We determine amortization periods generally reflecting useful lives and the cash flow streams
associated with them. When the pattern in which economic benefit of asset consumption is
undeterminable, we amortize using the straight-line method.
56
We consider certain factors when
assigning useful lives such as legal, regulatory and contractual provisions, as well as the effects
of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors. See Note 7.
We evaluate the carrying value of our intangible assets and goodwill for impairment at least
annually as of July 1 or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of the assets may not be recoverable from related future undiscounted cash flows. Indicators
that could trigger an impairment review include legal and regulatory factors, market conditions,
and operational performance. Impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying amount
and the fair value of the assets, and is recognized as a component of income from operations. We
recognized no material impairment in fiscal 2005, 2004 or 2003.
Other Assets
Other assets are primarily comprised of prepaid or deferred royalty costs, deferred debt offering
costs, and refundable deposits.
Royalties
We pay royalty and license fees for the use of third party trade names, celebrity likenesses,
content, and other intellectual property rights. We have classified prepaid and deferred royalty
costs as current and non-current assets based on the period of expected consumption related to
projected revenues. We amortize prepaid and deferred royalties to cost of product sales or cost
of gaming operations over the estimated period of expected consumption based on forecasted sales
and placement schedules. If a pattern cannot be reliably determined, we use the straight-line
method over the contract life. We also contract with certain parties for intellectual property
rights where future payments are contingent upon revenues generated.
We evaluate the future realization of prepaid and deferred royalties quarterly. Portions
deemed unrealizable related to royalties incurred after the related product has been released for
general distribution are charged to cost of product sales or cost of gaming operations. Royalties
deemed unlikely to be realized before the related product has been released for general
distribution are charged to R&D expense.
Deferred Income Taxes
We recognize deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of
events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred income taxes
reflect the net tax effects of (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and (b)
operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. We determine the net current and non-current
deferred tax assets or liabilities separately for federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions.
Derivatives
We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at the fair value of the instruments.
Accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use and resulting
designation. We use derivative financial instruments to minimize our market risk exposure
resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. The primary business
objective of our hedging program is to minimize the impact to our earnings resulting from exchange
rate changes. The counter parties to our agreements are major commercial banks and we expect
losses related to credit risk will be remote. We are not a party to leveraged derivatives and do
not hold or issue financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Foreign Currency Hedging
We routinely use derivative financial instruments to hedge our net exposure, by currency, related
to our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional foreign currency. These
hedging instruments are subject to fluctuations in value that are generally offset by the value of
the underlying exposures being hedged. These forward exchange contracts are not designated as
hedging instruments under SFAS 133 and resulting gains or losses are recognized in current
earnings.
Interest Rate Management
We have used interest rate swap agreements to strategically diversify our debt portfolio between
fixed and variable rate instruments. The amount and term of each interest rate swap agreement was
matched with all or a portion of the then outstanding principal balance and remaining term of a
specific debt obligation. The agreements involved the exchange of fixed interest rates for
variable interest rates over the life of the agreement without an exchange of the notional amount
upon which the payments are based. The differential to be received or paid as interest rates
change was accrued and recognized as an adjustment of interest expense related to the debt. Our
interest rate swap agreements qualified for the short cut method of accounting under SFAS 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, allowing for an assumption of no
ineffectiveness in the hedging relationship. We recorded an asset or liability for the change in
the fair value of the swap instruments, with an offsetting adjustment to the carrying value of the
related debt. We had no interest rate swaps outstanding at September 30, 2005.
57
Jackpot Liabilities and Expense
WAP systems jackpots are generally payable in equal installments over a 20 to 26 year period
or immediately in the case of our instant win progressive jackpots. Winners may elect to receive a
lump sum payment for the present value of the jackpot discounted at applicable interest rates in
lieu of periodic annual installments. Discount rates eligible for use in the lump sum payment
calculation vary by jurisdiction and are impacted by market forces and other economic conditions.
Jackpot liabilities are comprised of payments due previous winners, as well as amounts due future
winners of progressive jackpots not yet won. Previous winner liabilities for periodic payments are
carried at the amortized cost of the jackpot annuity investments used to fund future periodic
payments. Liabilities due future winners are carried at the present value of the amount carried on
progressive jackpot meters for jackpots not yet won. Jackpot expense for the cost to fund jackpots
is subject to changes in the discount or interest rate used to present value progressive jackpot
liabilities due future winners.
We estimate the present value of progressive jackpot liabilities due future winners using
current market prime, treasury, or agency rates weighted with historical lump sum payout election
ratios. The most recent historical patterns indicate that approximately 85% of winners will elect
the lump sum payment option. Additionally, we estimate current liabilities for jackpots not yet
won based on our historical experience with winner payment elections, in conjunction with the
theoretical projected number of jackpots expected to hit within one year.
WAP Systems Interest
Interest income accretion on jackpot annuity investments used to fund periodic payments is offset
by interest expense accretion for the accompanying jackpot liabilities for payments due previous
winners. The interest income and expense accrete at approximately the same rate and vary depending
on the amount of jackpots won and the number of winners electing periodic payments. WAP systems
interest expense totaled $31.3 million in fiscal 2005, $26.1 million in 2004, and $23.2 million in
2003.
We also hold a significant amount of cash and short-term investments related to our WAP operations
on which we earn interest income.
Other Liabilities
Other liabilities are primarily comprised of accrued unconditional minimum license and royalty
arrangements, deferred compensation, minority interest, and customer deposits.
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency of certain IGT international subsidiaries is the local currency. For those
subsidiaries, we translate assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet
date, and income and expense accounts at average exchange rates during the year. Resulting
currency translation adjustments are recorded directly to accumulated other comprehensive income
within stockholders equity. Gains and losses resulting from transactions in non-functional
currencies are recorded in income. For subsidiaries whose functional currency is the US dollar,
gains and losses on non-US dollar denominated assets and liabilities are recorded in income.
Hurricane Damages
We suffered damages and losses to our US gulf coast operations in the wake of hurricanes Katrina in
August 2005 and Rita in September 2005, affecting:
|
ª |
1,800 gaming operations machines (700 destroyed or rendered inoperable and 1,100
temporarily shutdown) |
|
|
ª |
two WAP monitoring rooms rendered temporarily non-operational until reestablished at an alternative site |
|
|
ª |
100 employees |
|
|
ª |
500 machine sales orders pending delivery |
|
|
ª |
three AdvantageTM Systems installations canceled or delayed |
As a result, we recorded $5.5 million pre-tax of hurricane related expenses in September 2005,
including $2.8 million for the carrying value of assets destroyed, net of minimum insurance
recoveries, $1.7 million in other operating costs, and $1.0 million for disaster relief programs.
No determination has been made as to the total amount or timing of insurance payments. We carry
comprehensive business interruption and property damage insurance. We are working closely with our
insurance carriers, claims adjustors, and consultants to ascertain the full amount of insurance
proceeds due to IGT as a result of the damages and losses suffered in the hurricanes. Business
interruption insurance recoveries for lost earnings and any property insurance reimbursements over
book value will be recorded when realized and all contingencies have been resolved, which may
result in future period fluctuations affecting comparability.
58
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
FSP FAS13-1
In October 2005, the FASB issued final FSP FAS13-1, Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a
Construction Period, stipulating that rental costs associated with operating leases should be: (a)
recognized as rental expense, (b) included in income from continuing operations, and (c) allocated
over the lease term according to guidance in FAS 13, Accounting for Leases, and FASB Technical
Bulletin 85-3, Accounting for Operating Leases with Scheduled Rent Increases. FAS 13-1 is
effective for the first reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005, which will be IGTs
second quarter of fiscal 2006. We have no current application for this statement and anticipate no
material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows as a result of
adopting this FSP.
FSP FAS143-1
In June 2005, the FASB issued final FSP FAS143-1, Accounting for Electronic Equipment Waste
Obligations, to address accounting for obligations associated with the European Unions Directive
2002/96/EC on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. The Directive, enacted in 2003, requires
EU-member countries to adopt legislation to regulate the collection, treatment, recovery, and
environmentally sound disposal of electrical and electronic waste equipment. The Directive
distinguishes between products put on the market after August 13, 2005 as new waste and before that
date as historical waste. FSP FAS143-1 only addresses accounting for historical waste and is
required to be applied the later of the first reporting period ending after June 8, 2005 or the
date of adoption of the law by the applicable European Union member country. We anticipate no
material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows as a result of
adopting this FSP.
SFAS 154
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, requiring
retrospective application to prior-period financial statements of changes in accounting principle,
unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect
of the change. SFAS 154 also redefines restatement as the revising of previously issued
financial statements to reflect correction of errors made. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting
charges and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, which
will be IGTs fiscal year 2007. The adoption of this statement may impact our future results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
FIN 47
In March 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations, an Interpretation of FAS 143. FIN 47 requires recognition of a liability for the fair
value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be
reasonably estimated. When sufficient information exists, uncertainty about the amount and/or
timing of future settlement should be factored into the liability measurement. The interpretation
is effective for the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005, which will be IGTs fiscal
year 2006. We anticipate no material impact on our results of operations, financial position or
cash flows as a result of adopting this interpretation.
SFAS 109-1
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 109-1, Applications of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities provided by the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004. SFAS 109-1 states that the qualified production activities deduction should
be accounted for as a special deduction in accordance with SFAS 109. This statement was effective
immediately. The adoption of this statement had no material impact on our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
SFAS 109-2
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the
Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. SFAS 109-2
allows enterprises time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect
on plans for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS 109.
This statement was effective upon issue. The adoption of this statement had no material impact on
our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
EITF 04-8
In December 2004, the FASB issued and we adopted EITF 04-8, The Effect of Contingently
Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share, requiring the inclusion of convertible shares in
diluted EPS regardless of whether the market price trigger had occurred. Resulting restatements
reduced diluted EPS from continuing operations by approximately $0.01 in each of the last three
quarters of fiscal 2003 and the first quarter of fiscal 2004.
59
SFAS 123R and SAB 107
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, replacing SFAS
123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and superseding APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees. SFAS 123R requires recognition of share-based compensation in the financial
statements. SFAS 123R will be effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after
June 15, 2005, which will be IGTs first quarter of fiscal 2006. We currently expect to continue
using the Black-Scholes valuation model and restate comparative prior period earnings under the
modified retrospective method. We estimate the adoption of SFAS123R will reduce earnings
consistent with our Pro forma Stock Based Compensation Expense disclosures above.
In March 2005, the SEC issued SAB 107, Share-Based Payment, providing interpretive guidance on SFAS
123R valuation methods, assumptions used in valuation models, and the interaction of SFAS 123R with
existing SEC guidance. The additional SAB 107 requirement for the classification of stock
compensation expense to the same financial statement line as cash compensation will impact our cost
of product sales and gaming operations, related gross profits and margins, R&D, and SG&A expenses.
SFAS 153
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, amending APB 29, which
treated nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets as an exception from fair value
measurement. SFAS 153 replaces this exception with a general exception from fair value
measurement for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Nonmonetary
exchanges have commercial substance if the future cash flows of an entity are expected to change
significantly as a result of the exchange. This statement is effective for nonmonetary asset
exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005, which was IGTs fourth quarter
of fiscal 2005. The adoption of this statement had no material impact on our results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
SFAS 151
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 151, Inventory Costs, amending ARB 43 Chapter 4, Inventory
Pricing. SFAS 151 clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight
and handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). SFAS 151 introduces the concept of normal
capacity requiring allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based upon normal
capacity of production facilities. Unallocated overhead costs must be expensed in the period in
which they are incurred. This statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005, which will be IGTs fiscal year 2006. We anticipate no
material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows as a result of
adopting this statement.
|
|
|
2. |
|
Acquisitions, Divestitures and Discontinued Operations |
Acquisitions
We have not provided pro forma financial information for the following acquisitions, as they were
not material to our consolidated results.
WagerWorks
On August 25, 2005, we completed the acquisition of WagerWorks, a provider of internet gaming
technology, content and services. We anticipate this business combination will enable us to expand
the distribution of IGT game content across new channels and mediums, including internet, mobile
devices, and interactive television.
As the business valuation is not yet complete and the final consideration amount is subject to a
working capital adjustment, the purchase price allocation is preliminary. As of September 30,
2005, we allocated the aggregate purchase price of $88.1 million to:
|
ª |
tangible assets of $5.9 million, including $2.2 million in cash |
|
|
ª |
liabilities of $10.5 million |
|
|
ª |
identifiable intangibles of $34.8 million, including $10.0 million in patents, $11.6
million in contracts, and $13.2 million in developed technology |
|
|
ª |
$1.3 million of in-process R&D with no future alternative use charged immediately to expense |
|
|
ª |
$56.6 million in goodwill not deductible for tax purposes |
Friendly Matrix
On December 16, 2004, IGT acquired substantially all the assets of Friendly Matrix, including
several products we anticipate will enhance our IGT Advantage systems functionality. The total
purchase consideration of $1.6 million was allocated primarily to developed technology.
60
Hi-Tech
On December 31, 2004, IGT acquired substantially all the assets of Hi-Tech, our former
distributor of gaming equipment and services in Canada. This asset acquisition is allowing us to
further develop our Canadian customer relationships, integrating Hi-Techs employees with IGTs
resources. The total purchase consideration of $10.3 million was allocated to accounts receivable,
inventories, as well as contract and customer relationship intangibles of $4.6 million.
Acres
On October 27, 2003, we completed the acquisition of Acres, specializing in the development of
gaming systems technology designed to assist casino operators in increasing patron loyalty. This
business combination enabled us to utilize the Acres gaming systems technology in developing more
integrated gaming systems products, and increased our competitive marketing capacity. The
aggregate purchase price of $134.0 million was allocated to net tangible assets of $9.7 million,
identifiable intangibles and non-deductible goodwill of $122.5 million, and in-process R&D of $1.8
million charged immediately to expense.
Divestitures and Discontinued Operations
Subsequent to the completion of the Anchor acquisition on December 30, 2001, we divested
certain acquired operations inconsistent with IGTs core business strategy. They were reclassified
as discontinued operations and assets held for sale for all periods presented. We ceased
depreciation and amortization for discontinued operations upon committing to the divestiture plans.
|
ª |
During fiscal 2003, the assets of the Anchor Coin Nevada slot route operations were
sold for $60.5 million and two Colorado casinos were sold for $82.3 million, for a
collective after-tax gain of $184,000. |
|
|
ª |
In September 2003, we sold the United Tote (UT) pari-mutuel wagering business for $12.3
million, recording an after-tax loss on sale of $8.9 million. |
|
|
ª |
IGT OnLine Entertainment Systems, Inc. and the lottery systems business of VLC, Inc.
were sold in November 2003 for $151.5 million, resulting in an after-tax gain of $56.8
million. |
The results of our discontinued operations are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
226.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income, net of tax |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale before tax |
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
(34.1 |
) |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale, net of tax |
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
58.9 |
|
|
$ |
15.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our portfolio of investment securities is available for sale and comprised primarily of ARS.
See Note 1 regarding prior year ARS reclassifications. Our portfolio included restricted ARS of
$63.1 million and $64.3 million, as well as equity
securities at cost of $1.2 million and $1.3 million, as of
September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
September 30, |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
331.2 |
|
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
331.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
381.0 |
|
|
$ |
.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
381.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We buy and sell ARS regularly as a means of effective cash management. Proceeds from the
sales of investment securities, primarily ARS, totaled $705.7 million in fiscal 2005, $2.0 billion
in 2004, and $923.9 million in 2003. We recorded no gains or losses during these years.
61
|
|
|
4. |
|
Jackpot Annuity Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
September 30, |
|
Value |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
521.6 |
|
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
564.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
518.4 |
|
|
$ |
63.9 |
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
$ |
578.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future maturities of these securities through 2030, including the accreted interest at maturity, totaled:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
2-5 |
|
|
6-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
62.5 |
|
|
$ |
290.2 |
|
|
$ |
244.1 |
|
|
$ |
154.3 |
|
|
$ |
751.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
Notes and Contracts Receivable |
Our notes and contracts receivable are presented net of unearned interest income and deferred
loan fees totaling $4.0 million at September 30, 2005 and $3.3 million at September 30, 2004, and
net of allowances for doubtful accounts below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
Non-current |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
$ |
22.5 |
|
Non-current |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33.8 |
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
27.6 |
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
Non-current |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
$ |
42.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated future collections of notes and contracts, net, as of September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Notes |
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Total |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
28.4 |
|
|
$ |
69.8 |
|
|
$ |
98.2 |
|
2007 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
2008 |
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
2009 |
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
114.6 |
|
|
$ |
147.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pala Note
Subsequent to the Anchor acquisition, we completed the sale of the Pala Band of Mission Indians
management agreement, which was classified as an asset held for sale in the purchase price
allocation. The sale included a subordinated secured promissory note for $63.0 million, requiring
monthly principal payments of $875,000 plus accrued interest. The note was paid off in fiscal
2004.
62
|
|
|
6. |
|
Concentrations of Credit Risk |
The financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist
principally of cash and cash equivalents and accounts, contracts, and notes receivable. We
maintain cash balances at several financial institutions in amounts that may be in excess of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits.
We place short-term investments in high credit quality financial institutions or in short
duration high quality securities. With the exception of US Government and Agency securities, our
investment policy limits the amount of credit exposure in any one financial institution, industry
group or type of investment.
Our revenues and resulting receivables are concentrated in specific legalized gaming regions. We
had no sales to a single customer that exceeded 10% of revenues during 2005, 2004 or 2003. The
table below shows the composition of our accounts, contracts, and notes receivable at September
30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Regions |
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
California |
|
|
12 |
|
|
New Jersey |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Louisiana |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Mississippi |
|
|
4 |
|
|
New Mexico |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Other (states 3% or less individually) |
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern region |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Central region |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Western region |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Regions |
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
Australia |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Japan |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Latin America |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Other (3% or less individually) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
7. |
|
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
Other patent additions below include $15.4 million for a half interest in SMIs portfolio of
RFID and optical bet recognition patents, as well as capitalized patent application legal costs.
The purchase price allocation for WagerWorks intangible assets is preliminary. See Note 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Average |
|
Year ended September 30, 2005 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
(In millions, except life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finite lived intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Contracts |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
|
$ |
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Balances at Fiscal Year End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finite Lived Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
$ |
323.3 |
|
|
$ |
92.7 |
|
|
$ |
230.6 |
|
|
$ |
286.7 |
|
|
$ |
64.7 |
|
|
$ |
222.0 |
|
Contracts |
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Developed Technology |
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Amount |
|
$ |
408.2 |
|
|
$ |
121.9 |
|
|
$ |
286.3 |
|
|
$ |
340.7 |
|
|
$ |
82.5 |
|
|
$ |
258.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Intangibles
Our aggregate amortization expense totaled $39.4 million in fiscal 2005, $36.6 million in 2004, and
$25.0 million in 2003, excluding any amounts classified in discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated annual amortization for next 5 years |
|
$ |
43.6 |
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
Goodwill Activity by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
932.0 |
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
$ |
967.4 |
|
Anchor purchase price adjustments |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
942.7 |
|
|
|
37.7 |
|
|
|
980.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acres acquisition |
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
Tax benefit of Anchor options exercised |
|
|
(23.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.3 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
994.7 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
1,035.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WagerWorks acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
Tax benefit of Anchor options exercised |
|
|
(.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.4 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.9 |
) |
|
|
(.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
994.3 |
|
|
$ |
96.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,090.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with EITF 00-23, Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under
APB 25 and FIN 44, goodwill was adjusted for the tax benefit of Anchor options exercised subsequent
to acquisition.
64
|
|
|
8. |
|
Credit Facilities and Indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding balance at September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
208.8 |
|
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
Senior convertible debentures, net of unamortized discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
602.2 |
|
|
|
591.8 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Notes Payable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
811.0 |
|
|
$ |
791.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value based on quoted market prices |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
827.1 |
|
|
$ |
859.6 |
|
Future debt obligations as of September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
Payments |
|
|
Discount |
|
|
Payable, net |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
978.6 |
|
|
$ |
(367.6 |
) |
|
$ |
611.0 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,178.6 |
|
|
$ |
(367.6 |
) |
|
$ |
811.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continue to be in compliance with all applicable covenants at September 30, 2005.
Senior Credit Facility
IGT entered into a new $1.5 billion senior credit facility (credit facility) with a syndicate
of banks on July 1, 2004, replacing the previous credit facility of $260.0 million. The credit
facility is structured in two components both with five year maturities:
|
ª |
a $1.3 billion revolver, of which $4.2 million was reserved for letters of credit at
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
ª |
a $200.0 million term loan funded on July 15, 2004 in conjunction with the early
redemption of our 2009 senior notes |
The interest rates applicable to the credit facility are based on our public credit ratings and
debt to capitalization ratio. Initially these rates were set at LIBOR plus 60.0 bps for both the
revolver and the term loan. A facility fee of 15.0 bps applies to the entire credit facility. The
interest rate on the term loan was 4.21% at September 30, 2005 and reset to 4.58% on October 15,
2005.
Financial covenants for the credit facility, as defined in the agreement, include a maximum
leverage ratio of 4:1 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3:1. The credit facility agreement
also includes certain restrictions on our ability to incur new indebtedness, issue guarantees, make
acquisitions or grant liens on our assets.
Absence of compliance with required covenant ratios would cause an event of default to occur. If
not cured, the default event could cause the entire outstanding borrowings under the credit
facility to become immediately due and payable, as well as trigger cross default provisions to
other debt issues.
Foreign Credit Facilities
Our foreign credit facilities totaled $51.6 million, with $42.8 million available at September 30,
2005. Renewals occur annually in January and July.
Senior Convertible Debentures
In a private offering on January 29, 2003 and February 5, 2003, we issued approximately $969.8
million principal amount at maturity of zero-coupon senior convertible debentures due January 29,
2033 for gross proceeds of approximately $575.0 million. Because the holders have the right to
require IGT to redeem the bonds for cash at accreted value on January 29, 2006, the debentures are
classified as a current liability. IGT also has the right to call the debentures for redemption at
accreted value anytime on or after January 29, 2006. If IGT calls the debentures, holders will be
notified at least 15 days, but not more than 60 days, prior to the redemption date and will have
the right to convert prior to redemption.
65
Absent a yield adjustment, the Debentures have a yield to maturity of 1.75%. The yield adjustment
feature may require IGT to pay contingent cash interest on the Debentures at prevailing market
rates to be determined during any six month period commencing on or after January 29, 2006, if the
average closing sale prices of our common stock for specified measurement periods is less than or
equal to 60% of the accreted conversion price of the Debentures during such specified periods.
The Debentures are convertible into 21.1704 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal
amount at maturity under any of the following circumstances:
|
(i) |
|
during specified conversion periods, if the closing sale prices of our common stock is
more than 120% of the accreted conversion price on the first day of such conversion period
for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the first day of such conversion
period (for example, the Debentures were convertible during the conversion period beginning
January 20, 2004 through April 19, 2004, because the closing price of our common stock was
more than $34.18 per share for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on
January 20, 2004) |
|
|
(ii) |
|
during specified periods, if the average trading price for a Debenture is less than 95% of
the average closing sale price of our common stock multiplied by the conversion rate for a
specified period |
|
|
(iii) |
|
during any period that our long term senior debt ratings (or the ratings on the
Debentures, if rated) are reduced to below Ba2 by Moodys and below BB by Standard & Poors
or our long-term senior debt (or the Debentures, if rated) cease to be rated by both rating
agencies |
|
|
(iv) |
|
the Debentures have been called for redemption |
|
|
(v) |
|
upon the occurrence and continuance of specified corporate transactions |
The market price for convertibility was not met during the measurement period ended October 17,
2005.
We may also be required to repurchase the Debentures upon the occurrence of specified change
of control events at the accreted value plus accrued and unpaid cash interest, if any. Upon a
change of control, we may elect to settle the repurchase price in cash or common stock valued at
95% of its average closing sale price for the five day trading period ending on the third trading
day prior to the repurchase date. Our right to pay the repurchase price for Debentures in common
stock upon a repurchase date or upon a change of control is subject to certain conditions,
including the registration under applicable federal and state securities laws of the shares of
common stock to be issued.
We entered into a registration rights agreement for the benefit of the holders of the
Debentures agreeing to file and keep effective a registration statement covering the resale of the
Debentures and underlying common stock by the holders for specified periods of time. Our
registration statement on Form S-3 relating to the resale of our Zero-Coupon Convertible Debentures
due January 29, 2033 became effective with the SEC on June 16, 2003. If we fail to maintain an
effective registration statement for the time periods specified, subject to permitted exceptions,
we will be required to pay certain additional cash interest as liquidated damages until the default
under the registration rights agreement is cured. Such liquidated damages range from 0.25% to
0.50% of the accreted value of the Debentures plus accrued and unpaid cash interest, if any.
Senior Notes
In February 2004, we redeemed our $400.0 million senior notes due May 2004. On July 16, 2004,
we redeemed the $569.6 million principal amount outstanding of our 2009 senior notes. Including
the cancellation of corresponding interest rate swaps, we recognized fiscal 2004 losses of $127.9
million or $81.4 million, after-tax, on these early debt retirements.
Anchors Senior Subordinated Notes
In fiscal 2002, we repurchased all but $103,000 of Anchors 9.875% senior subordinated notes
due 2008, primarily in a cash tender offer. The remaining Anchor notes were paid off on October 18,
2004.
66
We lease certain of our facilities and equipment under various agreements for periods through
December 2013. The following table shows future minimum payments required under these leases that
have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms as of September 30, 2005. Certain facility
leases provide that we pay utilities, maintenance, property taxes, and certain other operating
expenses applicable to the leased property, including liability and property damage insurance. For
leased properties no longer in use, we have accrued lease payments, net of anticipated sublease
receipts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
25.6 |
|
Rental expense in continuing operations totaled $12.7 million for fiscal 2005, $11.5
million for fiscal 2004, and $9.4 million for fiscal 2003. Rental expense in discontinued
operations totaled $520,000 for fiscal 2004 and $17.4 million for fiscal 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due previous winners |
|
$ |
767.3 |
|
|
$ |
776.1 |
|
Payments due future winners |
|
|
176.3 |
|
|
|
192.6 |
|
Unamortized discounts |
|
|
(237.8 |
) |
|
|
(249.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total jackpot liabilities |
|
$ |
705.8 |
|
|
$ |
719.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value based on quoted market prices |
|
$ |
750.3 |
|
|
$ |
776.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future payments due |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous winners |
|
$ |
77.5 |
|
|
$ |
65.0 |
|
|
$ |
62.3 |
|
|
$ |
61.7 |
|
|
$ |
60.7 |
|
|
$ |
440.1 |
|
|
$ |
767.3 |
|
Future winners |
|
|
135.1 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
176.3 |
|
Foreign Currency Hedging
At September 30, 2005, our net foreign currency exposure of $ 142.5 million related to our monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional currency was hedged with $ 127.2 million in
forward currency contracts. At September 30, 2004, our net foreign currency exposure of $53.1
million related to our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional currency was
hedged with $43.8 million in forward contracts.
Interest Rate Management
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we entered into four interest rate swap agreements with a
combined notional amount of $350.0 million, primarily to diversify a portion of our debt portfolio
between fixed and variable rate instruments. These swaps were cancelled on July 9, 2004 in
conjunction with the early redemption of our 2009 senior notes on July 16, 2004. See Note 8.
Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, we made payments based on a specific spread over
six-month LIBOR and received payments equal to the interest rate on our fixed rate senior notes.
These interest rate swaps were fair value hedges, which qualified for the shortcut method of
accounting under SFAS 133, allowing for an assumption of no ineffectiveness in the hedging
relationship. Accordingly, we recorded the change in the fair value of the swap instruments as
non-current assets or liabilities with an offsetting adjustment to the carrying value of the
related debt.
Debentures Yield Adjustment
The yield adjustment feature of our debentures requires contingent cash interest payments that are
triggered by our stock price and is thus considered an embedded derivative under SFAS 133 requiring
bifurcation. However, if an upward adjustment were anticipated to go into effect, IGT could
exercise its redemption right. Therefore, an investor could be expected to attribute no economic value to the yield adjustment feature. Accordingly, we
have ascribed no value and recorded no derivative asset or liability for this embedded derivative.
67
The calculation of diluted EPS from continuing operations below reflects our outstanding
debenture shares for all periods presented, in conjunction with the adoption of EITF 04-8, The
Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share, in our first quarter of
fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
436.5 |
|
|
$ |
429.8 |
|
|
$ |
375.3 |
|
After-tax interest expense on convertible debentures |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Numerator |
|
$ |
446.0 |
|
|
$ |
439.1 |
|
|
$ |
381.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
343.7 |
|
|
|
346.8 |
|
|
|
344.0 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock awards |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Dilutive effect of debentures |
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Denominator |
|
|
370.2 |
|
|
|
376.3 |
|
|
|
366.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average antidilutive stock award
shares excluded from diluted EPS |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
.9 |
|
From the end of fiscal 2005 through December 9, 2005, we repurchased an additional 1.9 million
common shares or less than 1% of outstanding shares. There were no other transactions
during this period that would have materially changed the number of basic or diluted shares
outstanding.
In September 2005, we prepaid $74.0 million in a structured share repurchase transaction
designed to settle in cash or IGT shares on November 15, 2005. Since our stock price was above
$27.40 per share on November 15, 2005, we received $77.8 million in cash. This transaction is
reflected in shareholders equity. Had this written put option not been prepaid, we would have
recorded a liability adjusted to market value through earnings.
Litigation
IGT has been named in and has brought lawsuits in the normal course of business. We do not expect
the outcome of these suits, including the lawsuits described below, to have a material adverse
effect on our financial position or results of future operations.
Alliance
On December 7, 2004, IGT filed a complaint in US District Court for the District of Nevada,
alleging that defendants Alliance Gaming Corp., Bally Gaming Intl, Inc., and Bally Gaming, Inc.
infringed six US patents held by IGT, US Patent numbers 6,827,646; 5,848,932; 5,788,573; 5,722,891;
6,712,698; and 6,722,985. On January 21, 2005, defendants filed an answer to IGTs complaint
raising various affirmative defenses to IGTs asserted claims. Defendants also asserted fourteen
counterclaims against IGT, including counterclaims for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement,
invalidity, unenforceability of the asserted patents, antitrust violations and for intentional
interference with prospective business advantage. IGT denies these allegations. In addition, IGT
has filed a motion to strike portions of defendants answer and affirmative defenses and to dismiss
certain of defendants counterclaims. Discovery is ongoing.
Brochu v. Loto Quebec
Loto Quebec commenced an action in warranty against VLC, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
IGT, and another manufacturer of video lottery machines in October 2003 in the Superior Court
of the Province of Quebec, District of Quebec, seeking indemnification for any damages that may
be awarded against Loto Quebec in a class action suit, also filed in the Superior Court of the Province of Quebec. The
class action against Loto Quebec, to which neither IGT nor any of its affiliates are parties,
was filed by Jean Brochu on behalf of himself and a class of other persons who allegedly
developed pathological behaviors through the play of video lottery machines made available by
Loto Quebec in taverns and other public locations. In this
68
action, plaintiff seeks to recover
on behalf of the class damages of approximately CAD$578.7 million, representing CAD$4,863 per
class member, and CAD$119.0 million in punitive damages. Loto Quebec is scheduled to file its
Plea in Defense in the main action in February 2006. VLCs Plea in Defense in the warranty
action is due in April 2006. The Court has scheduled trial of the entire action against Loto
Quebec to commence in early 2007.
Environmental Matters
CCSC, a casino operation sold by IGT in April 2003, is located in an area that has been designated
by the EPA as a superfund site as a result of contamination from historic mining activity in the
area. The EPA is entitled to proceed against current and prior owners and operators of properties
located within the site for remediation and response costs associated with their properties and
with the entire site. CCSC is located within the drainage basin of North Clear Creek and is
therefore subjected to potentially contaminated surface and ground water from upstream mining
related sources. Soil and ground water samples on the site indicate that several contaminants
exist in concentrations exceeding drinking water standards. We have applied the guidance in
Statement of Position 96-1 Environmental Remediation Liabilities and determined that a liability
has not yet been incurred.
Miller
In June 2003, a class action lawsuit was filed in Clark County, Nevada, District Court against
Acres and its directors, entitled Paul Miller v. Acres Gaming Incorporated, et al. The complaint
alleged that Acres directors breached their fiduciary duties to their stockholders in connection
with the approval of the merger transaction between Acres and IGT and sought to enjoin and/or void
the merger agreement among other forms of relief. On September 19, 2003, the Court denied
plaintiffs motion for a TRO to prevent Acres stockholders from voting on the merger. On September
24, 2003, plaintiff petitioned the Nevada Supreme Court to vacate the denial of the TRO and to
enjoin Acres from holding its stockholder vote on the merger. The Nevada Supreme Court denied the
petition on September 25, 2003. The plaintiffs action also seeks damages. On December 23, 2003,
defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs second amended complaint for failure to state a
claim on which relief may be granted. On April 29, 2004, the Court issued a ruling denying
defendants motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. On May 12, 2004 the Court issued an
order denying defendants motion to dismiss. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties on August 13,
2004, plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the
third amended complaint. The Court has not yet ruled on this motion.
Nevada Sales/Use Tax Matter
In February 2003, an IGT employee, presently on administrative leave, filed a sealed complaint
under Nevadas False Claims Act (State of Nevada ex rel. James McAndrews v. International Game
Technology, Anchor Coin and Spin for Cash Wide Area Progressive) alleging that IGT failed to pay
requisite Nevada sales/use taxes on certain Wheel of Fortune® games placed in Nevada since 1997 and
in connection with royalties received under intellectual property licensing agreements related to
the placement of Action Gaming games in Nevada since 1997.
The Attorney General and IGT both filed motions to dismiss the complaint in January 2004, and the
Court unsealed the action in February 2004. The Court denied both motions to dismiss the complaint
on July 1, 2004. A Petition for Writ of Mandamus was filed with the Nevada Supreme Court in
September 2004. The Court granted the petition. A stay of the lower court proceedings pending
action by the Nevada Supreme Court was granted by the trial court in September 2004. The matter
was argued and submitted to the Nevada Supreme Court in June 2005.
In October 2004 and again in July 2005, NDT advised us that we had a good-faith legal basis for our
position that no sales tax was payable on royalties received, but that NDT believed that sales tax
may be payable on some amount of the royalties. IGT disagrees with NDTs position that sales tax
may be payable on any part of the royalties and continues to correspond with NDT on this issue.
OSHA Matter
On July 8, 2004, two former employees filed a complaint with the US Department of Labor, OSHA,
alleging retaliatory termination in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The former
employees allege that they were terminated in retaliation for questioning whether Anchor and its
executives failed to properly disclose information allegedly affecting the value of Anchors
patents in connection with IGTs acquisition of Anchor in 2001. The former employees also allege
that the acquired patents are overvalued on the financial statements of IGT. Outside
counsel, retained by an independent committee of our Board of Directors, reviewed the allegations
and found them to be entirely without merit.
69
On November 10, 2004, the employees withdrew their complaint filed with OSHA and filed a notice of
intent to file a complaint in federal court. On December 1, 2004, a complaint was filed under seal
in the US District Court for Nevada. IGT filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in December 2004.
The court denied the motion on May 2, 2005. IGT has appealed this denial to the US Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. IGT believes that the allegations are without merit and intends to
vigorously defend this matter.
In the purchase price allocation, IGT used the relief of royalty valuation methodology to estimate
the fair value of the patents at $164.4 million, which is being amortized over the useful economic
life. The carrying value of the patents at September 30, 2005 totaled $109.9 million, with a
remaining life of approximately 10.5 years.
Poulos
Along with a number of other public gaming corporations, IGT is a defendant in three class
action lawsuits: one filed in the US District Court of Nevada, entitled Larry Schreier v. Caesars
World, Inc., et al, and two filed in the US District Court of Florida, entitled Poulos v. Caesars
World, Inc., et al. and Ahern v. Caesars World, Inc., et al., which have been consolidated into a
single action. The Court granted the defendants motion to transfer venue of the consolidated
action to Las Vegas.
The actions allege that the defendants have engaged in fraudulent and misleading conduct by
inducing people to play video poker machines and electronic slot machines, based on false beliefs
concerning how the machines operate and the extent to which there is an opportunity to win on a
given play. The amended complaint alleges that the defendants acts constitute violations of the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, and also give rise to claims for common law
fraud and unjust enrichment, and seeks compensatory, special, incidental and punitive damages of
several billion dollars.
In December 1997, the Court denied the motions that would have dismissed the Consolidated Amended
Complaint or that would have stayed the action pending Nevada gaming regulatory action. The
defendants filed their consolidated answer to the Consolidated Amended Complaint in February 1998.
In March 2002, the Court directed that certain merits discovery could proceed. In June 2002, the
Court denied the plaintiffs motion for class certification. An appeal of that denial was filed
timely with the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. All briefings were completed and oral
arguments were heard in January 2004.
On August 10, 2004, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld US District
Court Judge Roger Hunt in his denial of class certification. The class plaintiffs did not appeal
the decision and are proceeding with only their individual claims. Prior to the scheduled trial
date, on September 7, 2005, US District Court Judge Roger Hunt granted pending Motions for Summary
Judgment deciding that as a matter of law the defendants were entitled to judgment in their favor
on all issues. The plaintiffs timely filed a Notice of Appeal to the US Ninth Circuit Court.
Siena
In November 2001, Wild Games NG, LLC, owner and operator of the Siena Hotel Spa Casino, filed
suit against Acres in Washoe County Nevada District Court. Siena alleged Acres failed to perform
obligations under an Equipment Sale Agreement and sought consequential damages largely comprised of
lost profits. Acres believes that Sienas claims are unfounded and not permitted by the Equipment
Sales Agreement. Acres filed a counterclaim seeking payments due from Siena.
We accrued the jury verdict of $1.7 million returned on March 24, 2005 in favor of Siena, along
with related interest and legal costs. Acres subsequently filed several post-trial motions that
resulted in the verdict amount being affirmed, but costs and fees were reduced. On November 18,
2005, IGT paid $2.4 million, including interest and court awarded fees, and received a Satisfaction
of Judgment.
Arrangements with Off-Balance Sheet Risks
In the normal course of business, we are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk, such as performance bonds, guarantees and product warranties not reflected in our balance
sheet. We do not expect any material losses to result from these arrangements, and we are not
dependent on off-balance sheet financing arrangements to fund our operations.
Performance Bonds
Performance bonds outstanding related to gaming operations totaled $28.7 million at September 30,
2005. We are liable to reimburse the bond issuer in the event of exercise due to nonperformance.
Letters of Credit
Outstanding letters of credit issued under our line of credit to ensure payment to certain vendors
and governmental agencies totaled $4.2 million at September 30, 2005.
70
IGT Licensor Arrangements
Our sales agreements that include software and intellectual property licensing arrangements may
provide a clause whereby IGT indemnifies the third party licensee against liability and damages
(including legal defense costs) arising from any claims of patent, copyright, trademark or trade
secret infringement. Should such a claim occur, we could be required to make payments to the
licensee for any liabilities or damages incurred. Historically, we have not incurred any
significant costs due to infringement claims. As we consider the likelihood of recurring future
costs to be remote, no liability has been recorded.
Product Warranties
Our warranty costs in the table below are accrued based on historical trends in product failure
rates and expected costs to provide warranty services. The majority of our products are generally
covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to one year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
Reduction for payments made |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
Accrual for new warranties issued |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Adjustments for pre-existing warranties |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-Insurance
We are self-insured for various levels of workers compensation, directors and officers
liability, electronic errors and omissions liability, as well as employee medical, dental,
prescription drug, and disability coverage. We purchase stop loss coverage to protect against
unexpected claims. Accrued insurance claims and reserves include estimated settlements for known
claims, and actuarial estimates of claims incurred but not reported.
State and Federal Taxes
We are subject to sales, use, income and other tax audits and administrative proceedings in various
federal, state, and local jurisdictions. While we believe we have properly reported our tax
liabilities in each jurisdiction, we can give no assurance that taxing authorities will not propose
adjustments that increase our tax liabilities.
Income from continuing operations before tax consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US |
|
$ |
570.1 |
|
|
$ |
612.5 |
|
|
$ |
576.3 |
|
Non US |
|
|
111.1 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before tax |
|
$ |
681.2 |
|
|
$ |
653.5 |
|
|
$ |
598.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective income tax rates differ from statutory US federal income tax rates as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
Taxes at federal statutory rate |
|
$ |
238.4 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
228.7 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
209.5 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Foreign subsidiaries tax, net |
|
|
(.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
State income tax, net |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Prior years foreign tax credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
244.7 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
$ |
223.7 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
% |
|
$ |
223.3 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
Components of our provision for income taxes on continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
213.5 |
|
|
$ |
163.4 |
|
|
$ |
205.3 |
|
State |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
253.6 |
|
|
|
202.3 |
|
|
|
233.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
State |
|
|
.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(.6 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(.4 |
) |
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
244.7 |
|
|
$ |
223.7 |
|
|
$ |
223.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities are presented in the
table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves not currently deductible |
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
Current portion of net operating loss carry forwards |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.2 |
) |
Prepaid expenses currently deductible |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax assets |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackpot payment timing difference |
|
|
115.1 |
|
|
|
138.0 |
|
Foreign subsidiaries |
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
Difference between book and tax basis of property |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Goodwill and intangibles |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Net operating loss carry forwards |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177.0 |
|
|
|
185.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference between book and tax basis of property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.4 |
) |
Intangibles |
|
|
(83.2 |
) |
|
|
(58.8 |
) |
Interest expense on convertible debt |
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133.8 |
) |
|
|
(136.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-current deferred tax assets |
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
93.2 |
|
|
$ |
85.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our US net operating loss carry forwards in the amount of $53.2 million at September 30,
2005, will expire in tax years ending 2018 through 2024. The valuation allowance relates to net
operating losses and deferred tax
72
assets from our operations in Australia. We have not recognized potential tax benefits, as we
currently consider it unlikely these benefits will be realized.
Income taxes payable for federal, state, and foreign purposes have been reduced by tax benefits
from employee stock options exercised. We receive an income tax benefit based on the difference
between the market price of the stock issued at the time of exercise and the option price. The net
tax benefits from employee stock options totaled $26.6 million, $15.0 million, and $28.3 million
for fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively, and were reflected as an increase to additional paid
in capital.
We have not provided for US deferred income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on approximately
$26.4 million in cumulative undistributed earnings of certain non-US subsidiaries as of September
30, 2005, which we expect to be permanently reinvested in operations outside the US.
15. Other Comprehensive Income
Components of other comprehensive income included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax |
|
|
Tax Expense |
|
|
After tax |
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
Amount |
|
|
(Benefit) |
|
|
Amount |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses |
|
$ |
(.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains |
|
$ |
.5 |
|
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
.3 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
September 30, |
|
on Securities |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
Annual net change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Annual net change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Employee Benefit Plans
We have established a variety of employee benefit programs to attract, retain and
motivate our employees.
Employee Incentive Plans
Our profit sharing and 401(k) plan was adopted for US employees. IGT matches 100% of an employees
contributions up to $750 per year. Participants immediately vest in their contributions and IGTs
matching contributions. Additionally, IGT contributes a portion of profits to eligible employees,
which vest over a seven-year period. Cash sharing is distributed semi-annually to all eligible
employees and management bonuses are paid annually to selected employees.
73
Our non-qualified deferred compensation plan, implemented in September 1999, provides an unfunded
incentive compensation arrangement for eligible management and highly compensated employees.
Participants may elect to defer up to 50% of their annual earnings with a minimum deferral of
$2,000. Distributions can be paid out as short-term payments or at retirement. Retirement
benefits can be paid out as a lump sum or in annual installments over a term of up to 15 years.
Total annual contributions from operating profits for these plans totaled $66.7 million in fiscal
2005, $81.0 million in fiscal 2004, and $83.4 million in fiscal 2003.
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We maintain a qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan under which each eligible employee may be
granted an option with a 12-month term to purchase shares of IGTs common stock, exercisable the
last day in February each year. Employees who have completed 90 days of service prior to the
beginning of the plan year are eligible. Employees who are 5% or more shareholders and employees
of certain subsidiaries are excluded. Employees may participate in this plan through payroll
deductions up to a maximum of 10% of their base pay. The option price is equal to 85% of the
market value of the common stock on the date of grant or on the date of exercise, whichever is
less. As of September 30, 2005, 12.6 million shares were authorized under our ESPP plan, of which
3.2 million shares remain available for future grants. Based on payroll contributions through
September 2005, we expect to issue approximately 256,800 shares in fiscal 2006.
In January 1999, we made 1.2 million shares of common stock available under the Barcrest Savings
Related Share Option Scheme. Eligible employees may enroll in this plan each year, electing to
vest over three, five, or seven years. The option price is equal to 80% of the fair market value
of the common stock on the date of grant. Employees may contribute up to £3,000 (approximately
$5,400) annually. At September 30, 2005, approximately 707,220 shares remain available for grant
under this plan. Based on enrollment through September 2005, we expect to issue approximately
50,500 shares in fiscal 2006.
Stock Incentive Plan
Under the IGT Stock Incentive Plan, our eligible employees and non-employee directors may be
granted non-qualified and incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock
awards, or performance based share awards and stock bonuses. Stock-based compensation, inclusive
of restricted stock awards, option modifications, and converted Anchor options, totaled $3.7
million in fiscal 2005, $2.0 million in 2004, $4.4 million in 2003.
An employee option grant typically vests ratably over five years and allows the option holder to
purchase stock over specified periods of time, generally 10 years from the date of grant, at a
fixed price equal to the market value at the date of grant. At the date of acquisition, 8.8
million outstanding Anchor stock option shares were converted into IGT stock options at the
original terms and conditions. The fair value of all converted options were included in the
purchase price allocation and deferred compensation for the unvested portion was amortized over the
remaining average 3-year service period. No options for additional shares may be granted under
Anchor plans and any options cancelled under the Anchor plans may not be reissued.
In the table below of our stock awards as of September 30, 2005, the aggregate intrinsic value is
based on our closing stock price of $27.00. Exercisable in-the-money options totaled 7.3 million
at September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Range of |
|
Award |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Award |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Value |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Shares |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(thousands) |
|
$00.00 $11.61 |
|
|
5,159,412 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
|
$ |
7.97 |
|
|
$ |
98,184 |
|
|
|
3,404,332 |
|
|
$ |
7.91 |
|
|
$ |
64,989 |
|
11.66 18.98 |
|
|
6,299,171 |
|
|
|
6.45 |
|
|
|
17.18 |
|
|
$ |
61,858 |
|
|
|
3,023,763 |
|
|
|
16.90 |
|
|
$ |
30,540 |
|
19.01 26.92 |
|
|
2,647,068 |
|
|
|
7.66 |
|
|
|
21.01 |
|
|
$ |
15,856 |
|
|
|
905,814 |
|
|
|
21.24 |
|
|
$ |
5,217 |
|
27.02 33.40 |
|
|
3,526,850 |
|
|
|
8.91 |
|
|
|
31.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,900 |
|
|
|
30.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
33.57 46.82 |
|
|
5,655,400 |
|
|
|
8.65 |
|
|
|
36.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
781,773 |
|
|
|
37.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$00.00 $46.82 |
|
|
23,287,901 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
|
|
$ |
22.38 |
|
|
$ |
175,898 |
|
|
|
8,462,582 |
|
|
$ |
16.20 |
|
|
$ |
100,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
Forfeited and expired award shares in the table below may include awards from prior
cancelled plans under which shares are no longer available for grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
Stock Award |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Available for |
|
Stock Incentive Plan Activity |
|
Shares |
|
|
(per share) |
|
|
Grant |
|
(In millions except share exercise amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2002 |
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
10.53 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Granted options |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
20.09 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
Granted restricted stock awards |
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.4 |
) |
Expired |
|
|
(.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
7.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2003 |
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
13.37 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Granted options |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
34.58 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Granted restricted stock awards |
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.2 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
23.48 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
11.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2004 |
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
19.54 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Additional shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Granted options |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
31.87 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
Granted restricted stock awards |
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
28.30 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
31.95 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
11.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested restricted stock awards |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2005 |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
22.38 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
17. Related Party Transactions
During fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003, two IGT board members were also board members for
certain IGT customers. During fiscal 2004 and 2003, a member of our board was also a partner in a
law firm that we retained as outside counsel. We continue to place gaming products under revenue
sharing or joint venture arrangements in alliance with various gaming companies and design games
under expense sharing arrangements with certain distributors. Our progressive systems trusts in
Iowa and New Jersey were included as related parties prior to VIE consolidation under FIN 46 in
fiscal 2004.
Transactions recorded with related parties included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
56.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of payables |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Largest net receivable during the year |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
18. Business Segments
We view our business in two regional operating segments, each incorporating all types of
revenues:
|
|
ª The North America Division aggregates our operations in the US and Canada, including
the IGT Systems Group. |
|
|
ª The International Division aggregates our operations in Asia, Australia, New Zealand,
Europe, Japan, Latin America, Russia, South Africa, and the UK. |
Our business segments are designed to allocate resources within a framework of management
responsibility. Operating costs from one segment may benefit other segments. We continually
evaluate the alignment of our business development and administrative functions for reporting
purposes, which may result in changes to segment allocations. Prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current management view and presentation.
75
The Corporate Division administers certain unallocated income and expenses related to company-wide
initiatives, including capital deployment, treasury and cash management, as well as administrative
and oversight functions such as human resources, information systems, and legal counsel. The
Corporate Division includes all income and expenses related to debt, certain investment securities,
hedging and other corporate assets.
We do not recognize inter-company revenues or expenses upon the transfer of gaming products between
divisions. The North America Division includes revenues from Canada totaling $84.0 million in
fiscal 2005, $137.2 million in 2004 and $60.8 million in 2003. IGTs segment profit reflects
income from continuing operations before tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,878.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,137.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,890.1 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
708.9 |
|
|
|
991.1 |
|
|
|
842.9 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
1,170.0 |
|
|
|
1,146.0 |
|
|
|
1,047.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
|
665.9 |
|
|
|
864.2 |
|
|
|
740.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
202.6 |
|
|
|
132.7 |
|
|
|
119.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,709.3 |
|
|
|
2,923.7 |
|
|
|
2,628.8 |
|
Additions to long-lived assets |
|
|
218.8 |
|
|
|
204.0 |
|
|
|
125.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
500.5 |
|
|
$ |
347.6 |
|
|
$ |
238.0 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
472.0 |
|
|
|
330.2 |
|
|
|
225.7 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
|
116.3 |
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
411.9 |
|
|
|
224.4 |
|
|
|
163.5 |
|
Additions to long-lived assets |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment loss |
|
$ |
(101.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(294.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(198.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
743.2 |
|
|
|
724.9 |
|
|
|
1,392.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,379.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,484.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,128.1 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
1,180.9 |
|
|
|
1,321.3 |
|
|
|
1,068.6 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
1,198.5 |
|
|
|
1,163.4 |
|
|
|
1,059.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
|
681.2 |
|
|
|
653.5 |
|
|
|
598.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
58.1 |
|
|
|
90.5 |
|
|
|
116.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
222.2 |
|
|
|
149.8 |
|
|
|
134.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
3,864.4 |
|
|
|
3,873.0 |
|
|
|
4,185.2 |
|
Additions to long-lived assets |
|
|
238.6 |
|
|
|
210.9 |
|
|
|
128.6 |
|
76
19. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
(In millions, except per share amount and stock prices) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
641.2 |
|
|
$ |
551.0 |
|
|
$ |
579.6 |
|
|
$ |
607.6 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
313.1 |
|
|
|
273.7 |
|
|
|
308.2 |
|
|
|
295.7 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
189.7 |
|
|
|
146.2 |
|
|
|
167.4 |
|
|
|
160.4 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
122.5 |
|
|
|
93.9 |
|
|
|
114.7 |
|
|
|
105.4 |
|
Net income |
|
|
122.5 |
|
|
|
93.9 |
|
|
|
114.7 |
|
|
|
105.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS (1) |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
36.67 |
|
|
|
33.87 |
|
|
|
30.21 |
|
|
|
29.43 |
|
Low |
|
|
31.23 |
|
|
|
26.23 |
|
|
|
24.22 |
|
|
|
26.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
608.1 |
|
|
$ |
636.1 |
|
|
$ |
618.9 |
|
|
$ |
621.7 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
321.0 |
|
|
|
339.1 |
|
|
|
338.3 |
|
|
|
320.8 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
202.2 |
|
|
|
206.0 |
|
|
|
211.1 |
|
|
|
195.0 |
|
Income from continuing operations (3) |
|
|
116.7 |
|
|
|
117.7 |
|
|
|
141.1 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
Net income |
|
|
176.4 |
|
|
|
116.9 |
|
|
|
141.1 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS (1,3) |
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
36.96 |
|
|
|
45.78 |
|
|
|
46.82 |
|
|
|
38.17 |
|
Low |
|
|
28.09 |
|
|
|
34.65 |
|
|
|
33.45 |
|
|
|
28.72 |
|
|
(1) Diluted EPS has been adjusted to include outstanding convertible
debenture shares for all periods presented in conjunction with adoption of EITF
04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted EPS, adopted in our
first quarter ended December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) Certain operations acquired with Anchor that were not a strategic fit
with IGTs core business strategy were sold or held for sale, and therefore
reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods
presented. |
|
(3) Our fourth quarter 2004 includes pretax reductions of $127.9 million
($81.4 million after tax or $0.22 per diluted share) for losses on early
retirement of debt. |
77
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants
Not applicable
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily
is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls
and procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer concluded that IGTs disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the
reasonable assurance level.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the
Exchange Act) refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other
personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over our financial reporting.
We have evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2005.
This evaluation was performed using the internal control evaluation framework developed by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on such evaluation,
management has concluded that, as of such date, our internal control over financial reporting was
effective. Our evaluation of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting excludes WagerWorks, Inc., acquired by us on August 25, 2005. WagerWorks
contributed approximately .06% of our total revenue and 2.6% of our total assets at September 30,
2005.
Deloitte and Touche LLP has issued an attestation report on managements assessment of our
internal control over financial reporting. This report follows this Item 9A.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
78
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of International Game Technology:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that International Game Technology and subsidiaries (the
Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005,
based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded from their assessment the internal
control over financial reporting at WagerWorks, Inc., which was acquired on August 25, 2005 and
whose financial statements reflect total assets and revenues constituting 2.6% and .06%,
respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended
September 30, 2005. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial
reporting at WagerWorks, Inc. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the
possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to
error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained,
in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30,
2005, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement
schedule as of and for the year ended September 30, 2005 of the Company and our report dated
December 12, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial
statement schedule.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Reno, Nevada
December 12, 2005
79
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable
Part III
The information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, except as provided below, is
incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the
end of the fiscal year covered by this report.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
We have adopted the International Game Technology Code of Ethics for Executive and Financial
Officers (the finance code of ethics), a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and other finance organization employees.
The finance code of ethics is publicly available on our website at
www.IGT.com. If we make any
substantive amendments to the finance code of ethics or grant any waiver, including any implicit
waiver, from a provision of the code to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or
Corporate Controller, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on that website.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Equity compensation plans approved and not approved by shareholders as of September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
Number of securities to |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
|
be issued upon exercise |
|
|
exercised price of |
|
|
future issuance under |
|
|
|
of outstanding options, |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
equity compensation |
|
Plan category |
|
warrants, and rights |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
plans |
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by shareholders (1) |
|
|
23,287,901 |
|
|
$ |
22.38 |
|
|
|
13,155,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans
not approved by shareholders (2) |
|
|
191,261 |
|
|
|
19.98 |
|
|
|
707,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
23,479,162 |
|
|
$ |
22.27 |
|
|
|
13,862,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares under the International Game Technology Stock
Incentive Plan and Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes shares available under the Barcrest Savings Related Share Option
Scheme established in January 1999. This plan is a broad-based employee stock purchase
program available to certain UK employees, designed to satisfy certain tax requirements
under applicable UK tax law. The program is generally intended to replicate for our UK
employees the same incentives that are made available to our US employees through our
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Shareholder approval for this plan was not required. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
80
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedule
(a)(1) |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements and Related Information under Item
8 in Part II hereof where these documents are listed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(2)
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule: |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
Other financial statement schedules are either not required or the required information is
included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto. |
|
|
|
Parent Company Financial Statements Financial Statements of the Registrant only are
omitted under Rule 3-05 as modified by ASR 302. |
|
|
|
(a)(3) Exhibits: |
|
3.1 |
|
Articles of Incorporation of International Game Technology, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
1995) |
|
3.2 |
|
Third Restated Code of Bylaws of International Game Technology, dated June 23, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, File number 001-10684, filing date June
29, 2005) |
|
4.1 |
|
Indenture, dated as of May 19, 1999 by and between International Game Technology and The Bank
of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registration Statement No. 333-81257,
Form S-4 filed by Registrant) |
|
4.2 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 11, 1999, by and among International Game
Technology, Salomon Smith Barney Inc., BNY Capital Markets, Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Lehman
Brothers Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement No. 333-81257, Form S-4 filed by
Registrant) |
|
4.3 |
|
Indenture dated as of January 29, 2003 between IGT, any subsidiary that becomes a party
thereto, and the Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-103339), as filed by Registrant on
February 20, 2003) |
|
4.4 |
|
Form of Zero-Coupon Convertible Debentures (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-103339), as filed by Registrant on
February 20, 2003) |
|
4.5 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of January 29, 2003 between IGT and Goldman, Sachs &
Co., as the Initial Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-103339), as filed by Registrant on February 20,
2003) |
|
10.1* |
|
Stock Option Plan for Key Employees of International Game Technology, as amended
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Registration Statement No. 33-12610 filed by
Registrant) |
|
10.2* |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Proxy
Statement for the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders) |
|
10.3* |
|
Form of officers and directors indemnification agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1996) |
|
10.4 |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among International Game Technology, The
Bank of New York, Wells Fargo and other banks, dated August 10, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5E to Registrants Report on Form 10K for the year ended September
30, 2001) |
|
10.5 |
|
Facility Agreement between I.G.T. (Australia) Pty. Limited and National Australia Bank
Limited, dated March 18, 1998; guarantee from International Game Technology to National
Australia Bank Limited, dated March 18, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to
Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998) |
|
10.6 |
|
Amendment Notes between Silver Club and CMS-El Capitan and International Game Technology
dated November 5, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Registrants Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 1999) |
|
10.7 |
|
Barcrest Savings Related Share Option Scheme (incorporated by reference to Registration
Statement No. 333-94349, Form S-8 filed by Registrant on January 10, 2000) |
|
10.8* |
|
IGT Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Registrants
Report on Form 10K/A for the year ended September 30, 2000) |
81
10.9* |
|
International Game Technology 1993 Stock Option Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of
August 27, 1996) (Composite Plan Document Incorporating Amendments 1998-I, 1998-II and
2000-I)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Registrants Report on Form 10Q/A for
the quarter ended March 31, 2001) |
|
10.10* |
|
International Game Technology 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2002) |
|
10.11* |
|
IGT Profit Sharing Plan (As Amended and Restated as of April 1, 2002) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.01 to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December
28, 2002) |
|
10.12* |
|
Amended Employment Agreement with Maureen Mullarkey, Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer dated January 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to
Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2003), and Exhibit A
referenced therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Registrants Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001) |
|
10.13 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 29, 2003, by and among International Game
Technology, NWAC Corporation, and Acres Gaming (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to
Form 8-K, File number 001-10684, filing date June 29, 2003) |
|
10.14* |
|
Employment Agreement with Thomas J. Matthews, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief
Operating Officer dated October 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to
Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003) |
|
10.15* |
|
IGT 2002 Stock Incentive Plan Agreement Forms: Director Stock Option Agreement; Incentive
Stock Option Agreement; Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement; Restricted Stock Award Agreement;
UK Stock Option Sub-Plan (the UK Sub-Plan) Option Agreement |
|
10.16* |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated effective as of March 1, 1999) (Composite
Plan Document Reflecting July 2003 Stock Split and December 2003 Amendment) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A to the Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders) |
|
10.17 |
|
Credit agreement by and among International Game Technology, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Bank of
America, N.A. and other banks dated July 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01
to Registrants Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004) |
|
10.18* |
|
Summary of IGT Management Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004) |
|
10.19* |
|
Amendments to the International Game Technology 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, File number 001-10684, filing date March 4, 2005) |
|
10.20* |
|
Summary of Named Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005) |
|
10.21 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 26, 2005, by and among International Game
Technology, and Winter Subsidiary, Inc., and WagerWorks, Inc., and Carl Berg and DDJ Capital
Management, LLC. |
|
21 |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
23 |
|
Independent Auditors Consent |
|
24 |
|
Power of Attorney (see page 83) |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
82
Power of Attorney Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on the 13th day of December 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Game Technology
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Maureen T. Mullarkey
|
|
|
|
Maureen T. Mullarkey |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Thomas J. Matthews and Maureen T.
Mullarkey, or either of them, as attorneys-in-fact to sign on their behalf, individually, and in
each capacity stated below, and to file all amendments and/or supplements to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
/s/ Thomas J. Matthews
Thomas J. Matthews
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
December 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Maureen T. Mullarkey
Maureen T. Mullarkey
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Executive
Vice President, Finance (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer), and
Treasurer
|
|
December 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Neil Barsky
Neil Barsky
|
|
Director
|
|
December 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert A. Bittman
Robert A. Bittman
|
|
Director
|
|
December 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard Burt
Richard Burt
|
|
Director
|
|
December 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Leslie Heisz
Leslie Heisz
|
|
Director
|
|
December 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert A. Mathewson
Robert A. Mathewson
|
|
Director
|
|
December 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert Miller
Robert Miller
|
|
Director
|
|
December 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frederick Rentschler
Frederick Rentschler
|
|
Director
|
|
December 13, 2005 |
83
SCHEDULE II Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of |
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
Balance |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 09/30/03 |
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 09/30/04 |
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 09/30/05 |
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
$ |
(.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.0 |
) |
|
$ |
20.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful notes
and contracts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 09/30/03 |
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
(8.7 |
) |
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 09/30/04 |
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
.8 |
|
|
$ |
42.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 09/30/05 |
|
$ |
42.4 |
|
|
$ |
.7 |
|
|
$ |
(.3 |
) |
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
Exhibit
No. |
|
Description |
10.21
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 26, 2005, by and among International Game
Technology, and Winter Subsidiary, Inc., and WagerWorks, Inc., and Carl Berg and DDJ Capital
Management, LLC. |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
23
|
|
Independent Auditors Consent |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |