SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Amendment No. 2)
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section
240.14a-12
UNI-MARTS INC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] No fee required.
[X] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction
applies: Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
4,849,683
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): $2.25
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: $9,265,320.75
(5) Total fee paid: $1173.92
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid: _____________________________________
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: _______________
(3) Filing Party: _______________________________________________
(4) Date Filed: _________________________________________________
Uni-Mart Logo
477 East Beaver Avenue
State College, Pennsylvania 16801-5690
June 9, 2004
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of stockholders of
Uni-Marts Inc. The meeting will be held at the Ramada Inn and Conference Center,
1450 South Atherton Street, State College, Pennsylvania on Tuesday, June 29,
2004, commencing at 9:00 A.M.
At the meeting, you will be asked to vote on a proposal to adopt the
Agreement and Plan of Merger between Green Valley Acquisition Co., LLC and
Uni-Marts Inc., dated January 26, 2004, and approve the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger of Uni-Marts with and
into Green Valley as the surviving company.
Green Valley is owned by two limited liability companies, one of which,
Tri-Color Holdings, LLC, is owned by three individuals who are directors or
executive officers of Uni-Marts and several of their family members. Following
the merger, Green Valley will own Uni-Marts' assets and business. If the merger
is completed, Uni-Marts' stockholders will have the right to receive $2.25 in
cash in exchange for each share of Uni-Marts' common stock that is outstanding
at the time of the merger. Uni-Marts' stockholders (other than those who own
interests in Green Valley) will not have any interest in Uni-Marts' or Green
Valley's business after the merger.
The Board of Directors, based upon the recommendation of the Ad Hoc
Committee of Directors (a group of three independent directors who have no
financial interest in the acquiring entity) that considered the merger proposal,
recommends that you vote "FOR" the adoption of the merger agreement and approval
of the merger. The Ad Hoc Committee determined and reported to the Board of
Directors that the $2.25 per share to be received by Uni-Marts' stockholders
pursuant to the merger agreement is fair from a financial point of view to such
stockholders. In arriving at its recommendation, each member of the Ad Hoc
Committee gave careful consideration to a number of factors described in the
accompanying proxy statement. One factor was the opinion of Boenning &
Scattergood, Inc., an investment banking firm retained by the Ad Hoc Committee
to advise it as to the fairness from a financial point of view, of the
consideration to be paid to Uni-Marts' stockholders pursuant to the merger
agreement.
Under Delaware General Corporation Law, the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of outstanding shares of Uni-Marts' common stock is required to
adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger. The attached proxy statement
explains the proposed merger and provides specific information concerning the
special meeting of stockholders. It also includes copies of the merger agreement
and the written opinion of Boenning & Scattergood as Annex A and Annex C,
respectively. You should read these materials carefully before you vote. In
particular, you should carefully consider the discussion in the section entitled
"Special Factors" beginning on page 11.
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please complete, sign, date
and mail your proxy in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope promptly. If your
shares are held in the form of a certificate registered in your name, and you
sign, date and mail your proxy card without indicating how you want to vote,
your proxy will be counted as a vote "FOR" the adoption of the merger agreement
and approval of the merger. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or
otherwise held in the name of a nominee recordholder for your benefit, you must
indicate on the voting card how you want to vote. A failure to return the proxy
or voting card will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the merger.
Sincerely,
/s/ Stephen B. Krumholz
Stephen B. Krumholz
Chairman of the Ad Hoc Committee
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE TRANSACTION, PASSED UPON THE
MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE TRANSACTION, OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY
OF THE DISCLOSURE IN THIS DOCUMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 29, 2004
---------------------
UNI-MARTS INC.
477 EAST BEAVER AVENUE
STATE COLLEGE, PENNSYLVANIA 16801-5690
---------------
To The Stockholders of Uni-Marts Inc:
You are hereby notified that a special meeting of stockholders of Uni-Marts
Inc., will be held at the Ramada Inn and Conference Center, 1450 South Atherton
Street, State College, Pennsylvania on Tuesday, June 29, 2004, at 9:00 A.M., for
the following purposes:
(1) to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and
Plan of Merger between Green Valley Acquisition Co., LLC and Uni-Marts
Inc., dated January 26, 2004, and approve the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement, including the merger of Uni-Marts with and into Green
Valley as the surviving company; and
(2) to transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting.
The merger and related matters are described more fully in the attached
proxy statement, which includes a copy of the merger agreement as Annex A.
We have fixed the close of business on May 27, 2004 as the record date for
determining the stockholders of Uni-Marts entitled to vote at the special
meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting. Only holders of
record of Uni-Marts' common stock at the close of business on that date are
entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" the
approval of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger of Uni-Marts with and into Green Valley. The
affirmative vote by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Uni-Marts' common stock is required to adopt the merger agreement and approve
the merger.
The Board of Directors requests that you fill in and sign the enclosed
proxy card and mail it promptly in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope.
By order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Mary Ann Miller
Mary Ann Miller
Secretary
State College, Pennsylvania
June 9, 2004
PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED PROXY STATEMENT, THEN COMPLETE, EXECUTE AND PROMPTLY
RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE. IF YOU
PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING, PLEASE BRING THE ADMISSION TICKET ATTACHED
TO THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD. IF YOU ARE A STOCKHOLDER WHOSE SHARES ARE NOT
REGISTERED IN YOUR OWN NAME AND YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE BRING A
COPY OF THE VOTING FORM SENT TO YOU BY YOUR BROKER OR OTHER EVIDENCE OF STOCK
OWNERSHIP.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY TERM SHEET.......................................... 1
Parties to the Merger..................................... 1
Proposed Merger........................................... 2
Consequences of Merger.................................... 2
Vote Required............................................. 2
Recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee and the Board of
Directors.............................................. 3
Common Stock Price........................................ 4
Fairness Opinion.......................................... 4
Position of Uni-Marts Regarding the Purpose of the
Merger................................................. 4
Interests of Certain Persons.............................. 4
Position of Green Valley and the Green Valley Group
Regarding the Fairness and
Purpose of the Merger.................................. 4
Plans of Green Valley and the Green Valley Group After the
Merger................................................. 5
Appraisal Rights.......................................... 5
Completion of the Merger.................................. 5
Conditions to Completion of Merger........................ 5
Regulatory Filings and Approvals.......................... 5
Source of Funds for the Merger............................ 6
No Solicitation of Offers; Notice of Proposal for Third
Parties................................................ 6
Termination of Merger Agreement........................... 6
Expenses and Termination Fees............................. 6
Federal Income Tax Consequences........................... 6
CERTAIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING AND
THE SPECIAL MEETING....................................... 7
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS... 9
SPECIAL FACTORS............................................. 9
Background of the Merger.................................. 9
Purposes of the Merger.................................... 22
Reasons for the Ad Hoc Committee's Determination.......... 22
Recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee and Board of
Directors.............................................. 25
Position of the Green Valley Group Regarding the Fairness
and Purpose of the Merger.............................. 26
Opinion of Boenning & Scattergood......................... 27
Rights of Dissenting Stockholders of Uni-Marts............ 39
Interests of Certain Persons.............................. 41
Effects of the Merger..................................... 43
Plans of the Green Valley Group after the Merger.......... 44
Conduct of Business if Merger Not Done.................... 44
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences.... 45
Fees and Expenses......................................... 46
Accounting Treatment...................................... 47
Source of Funds for the Merger............................ 47
Regulatory Approvals...................................... 48
Risks that Merger will not be Consummated................. 48
Other Agreements Between Green Valley, Other Members of
the Green Valley Group
and Uni-Marts.......................................... 48
i
THE MERGER AGREEMENT........................................ 49
The Merger................................................ 49
Conversion of Common Stock................................ 50
Stock Options............................................. 50
Conditions to the Merger.................................. 50
Representations and Warranties............................ 51
Covenants................................................. 52
Certain Other Covenants................................... 54
Termination............................................... 55
Expenses and Termination Fees............................. 55
BUSINESS OF UNI-MARTS....................................... 56
UNI-MARTS' SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA............. 57
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS....................... 58
Results of Operations..................................... 58
Seasonality and Unaudited Quarterly Results............... 67
Liquidity and Capital Resources........................... 68
Contractual Obligations................................... 69
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates................ 69
Impact of Inflation....................................... 70
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT
MARKET RISK............................................... 70
BUSINESS OF GREEN VALLEY.................................... 71
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDENDS ON COMMON STOCK.................. 73
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP........................................ 74
Principal Stockholders.................................... 74
Recent Purchases.......................................... 76
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS........................................... 76
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE.................................. 76
OTHER AVAILABLE INFORMATION................................. 77
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS....................................... 78
OTHER MATTERS............................................... 79
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS............................... F-1
ANNEX A -- AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER..................... A-1
ANNEX B -- VOTING AGREEMENT................................. B-1
ANNEX C -- OPINION OF BOENNING & SCATTERGOOD, INC........... C-1
ANNEX D -- SECTION 262 OF DELAWARE GENERAL
CORPORATION LAW........................................... D-1
ii
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is furnished to the stockholders of Uni-Marts Inc. on
or about June 9 2004, in connection with the solicitation by the Board of
Directors of Uni-Marts of proxies to be voted at the special meeting of
stockholders on June 29, 2004 and any adjournment or postponement of such
meeting. References to "we," "us," and "our" in this proxy statement are
references to Uni-Marts.
SUMMARY TERM SHEET
This summary term sheet summarizes the material terms of the proposed
merger between Uni-Marts and Green Valley Acquisition Co., LLC and contains
other important information relating to the merger. You should read carefully
the entire proxy statement and the documents and other materials that are
annexed to this proxy statement before voting. The actual terms of the merger
are contained in the merger agreement that is attached to this proxy statement
as Annex A.
PARTIES TO THE MERGER
Uni-Marts Inc.
477 East Beaver Avenue
State College, PA 16801-5690
Phone: 814-234-6000
Uni-Marts is a Delaware corporation engaged in the operation of convenience
stores and discount tobacco stores. Uni-Marts operates 282 convenience stores
and Choice Cigarette Discount Outlets in Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware and
Maryland. Self-service gasoline is sold at 235 of these locations. Uni-Marts is
a public company whose stock is listed for trading on the American Stock
Exchange under the symbol "UNI." See "BUSINESS OF UNI-MARTS."
Green Valley Acquisition Co., LLC
477 East Beaver Avenue
State College, PA 16801-5690
Phone: 814-234-6000
Green Valley is a Pennsylvania limited liability company organized
specifically for the purpose of acquiring Uni-Marts. Green Valley has not
carried on any activities to date other than those incident to its formation and
the negotiation and execution of the merger agreement. See "BUSINESS OF GREEN
VALLEY."
Green Valley is owned by two entities, one of which, Tri-Color Holdings,
LLC, is controlled by Henry Sahakian, Daniel Sahakian and Ara Kervandjian. Henry
Sahakian is the current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Uni-Marts,
Daniel Sahakian is a current director of Uni-Marts, and Ara Kervandjian is the
current President of Uni-Marts. Other members of Tri-Color include certain
members of the extended families of Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian and
Kervandjian, certain trusts for the benefit of members of the families of such
persons, and HFL Corporation, a corporation owned and controlled by Messrs.
Henry and Daniel Sahakian.
The other entity that owns an interest in Green Valley is KOTA Holdings
LLC. The principal beneficial owners of KOTA Holdings are Raj Vakharia and Paul
Levinsohn, individuals who are not affiliated with Uni-Marts.
The business and affairs of Green Valley are managed under the direction of
a Board of Managers that currently consists of six individuals, referred to as
the "Green Valley Managers." Three of the Green Valley Managers were appointed
by Tri-Color, and three were appointed by KOTA Holdings. The current Green
Valley Managers are Henry Sahakian, Ara Kervandjian, Alex Sahakian, Raj
Vakharia, Paul Levinsohn, and Jaime Broderick. See "BUSINESS OF GREEN VALLEY."
Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian and Kervandjian are referred to
collectively in this proxy statement as the "Affiliated Stockholders." The
Affiliated Stockholders, together with members of their extended families,
trusts for the benefit of members of their extended families and HFL, who are
also beneficial owners of Uni-Marts' common stock and owners of Tri-Color, are
referred to collectively as the "Tri-Color Members." All other Uni-Marts'
stockholders, with the exception of KOTA Management Company, L.L.C., an entity
owned and controlled by Messrs. Vakharia and Levinsohn, are referred to herein
as the "Public Stockholders" or "unaffiliated stockholders." Collectively, Green
Valley, Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian, Kervandjian, Vakharia, and Levinsohn,
Tri-Color, HFL, KOTA Holdings and KOTA Management, who, collectively, are the
principal beneficial owners of Green Valley, are referred to as the "Green
Valley Group." See "BUSINESS OF GREEN VALLEY."
PROPOSED MERGER
If the merger agreement is adopted, Uni-Marts will be merged with and into
Green Valley. As a result of the merger, Uni-Marts' corporate existence will
cease and Green Valley will continue as the surviving entity (and is anticipated
to be renamed "Uni-Marts LLC"). The merger will become effective at the time a
certificate of merger is filed with the State of Delaware and articles of merger
are filed with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The merger is expected to occur
as soon as practicable after all conditions to the merger have been satisfied or
waived.
Upon consummation of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of
Uni-Marts' common stock will be cancelled and converted automatically into the
right to receive $2.25 in cash per share. The Tri-Color Members have contributed
to Green Valley their right to receive the merger consideration for
substantially all of their Uni-Marts' shares. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Source of
Funds for the Merger." In addition, each option to purchase shares of Uni-Marts,
whether vested or unvested, will automatically be converted into the right to
receive an amount in cash equal to $2.25 per share, less the applicable exercise
price, for each share of common stock subject to such options. See "THE MERGER
AGREEMENT."
CONSEQUENCES OF MERGER
Consummation of the merger will constitute a "going private" transaction.
Upon completion of the merger, Uni-Marts will be merged with and into Green
Valley, with Green Valley being the surviving company. After the merger,
Uni-Marts will cease to exist, and the assets, business and operations of
Uni-Marts will be owned by Green Valley. The Public Stockholders of Uni-Marts,
that is, all of Uni-Marts' stockholders other than the Tri-Color Members and
KOTA Management, will not own any part of Green Valley, and their shares of
Uni-Marts will automatically be converted into the right to receive an amount in
cash equal to $2.25 per share. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Effects of the Merger."
VOTE REQUIRED
The adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger requires
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Uni-Marts'
common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. The Board did not require a
majority vote of the Public Stockholders in order to approve the merger because
the merger and merger agreement were negotiated on behalf of all stockholders by
a fully empowered Ad Hoc Committee of the Board composed of three disinterested
and independent directors. The Ad Hoc Committee was advised of its duties and
responsibilities by independent legal counsel and retained an investment banking
firm to render an opinion with respect to the financial fairness of the
consideration to be paid to Uni-Marts' stockholders. The Board concluded that
members of the Ad Hoc Committee were fully informed, that they had vigorously
negotiated at arm's-length with representatives of Green Valley, and that the
decision making process followed by the Committee was procedurally fair to all
stockholders, including the unaffiliated Public Stockholders.
Between the Voting Agreements described below and indications from other
Directors and executive officers of Uni-Marts who are not Tri-Color Members,
approximately 47.3% of Uni-Marts' shares outstanding as of April 30, 2004, are
expected to be voted in favor of the merger. The failure of any stockholder to
vote, including any broker non-vote, or the abstention by any stockholder, will
have the same effect as a vote against the adoption of the merger agreement. See
"CERTAIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING AND THE SPECIAL MEETING" and
"SPECIAL FACTORS -- Recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee and Board of
Directors."
VOTING AGREEMENTS. Each of the Tri-Color Members and KOTA Management has
entered into a voting agreement with Green Valley pursuant to which such party
has agreed to vote the shares of Uni-Marts' common stock over which he, she or
it has voting control in favor of the merger and the merger agreement. The
Tri-Color Members and KOTA Management beneficially own an aggregate of 3,304,559
outstanding shares of Uni-Marts' common stock (representing approximately 45.8%
of the outstanding shares of Uni-Marts' common stock as of April 30, 2004). The
shares beneficially owned by the Tri-Color Members and KOTA Management include a
total of 401,400 shares acquired on March 19, 2004, at a price of $2.25 per
share from HP Limited Partnership and certain of its affiliates, each of
2
which is related to Jim Haseotes. HP Limited Partnership and Jim Haseotes had
previously expressed interest in buying Uni-Marts. See "SPECIAL
FACTORS -- Background of the Merger." See "BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP -- Principal
Stockholders."
The Tri-Color Members and KOTA Management also have (i) appointed Green
Valley as their proxy to vote their Uni-Marts' shares in accordance with the
matters covered by such voting agreements, (ii) agreed not to transfer any
Uni-Marts' shares owned by them while the voting agreements are in effect, and
(iii) agreed to tender their shares if Green Valley commences a tender offer
pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement. See "VOTING AGREEMENTS."
SHARES HELD BY OTHER DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
As of April 30, 2004, Directors and executive officers of Uni-Marts who are
not Tri-Color Members had beneficial ownership of 110,225 outstanding shares of
Uni-Marts' common stock, or 1.5% of the outstanding shares, and are expected to
vote, or direct the voting of their shares, in favor of the merger proposal. See
"BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP -- Principal Stockholders."
SHARES HELD BY UNI-MARTS' 401(K) PLAN
A total of 342,798 shares of Uni-Marts' common stock are held in the
Uni-Marts 401(k) Retirement Savings & Incentive Plan. The Trustee of the Plan,
N. Gregory Petrick, is the Chief Financial Officer of Uni-Marts. He has
delegated the discretion to vote the shares held by the Plan to Robert R.
Thomas, CFA, of Vantage Investment Advisors, LLC, the independent investment
advisor for the Plan. Uni-Marts has received no indication from Mr. Thomas as to
how he intends to vote the shares held in the Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors believes that the merger and the merger agreement
are procedurally and substantively fair to, and in the best interests of,
Uni-Marts' stockholders, generally, and the Public Stockholders in particular,
and recommends that the stockholders approve the merger and adopt the merger
agreement. In making the determination to approve and recommend the merger and
the merger agreement, the Board of Directors relied on the unanimous
recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee, which was comprised solely of
independent directors who have no affiliation with Green Valley and no financial
interest in the merger that is different from the interests of the Public
Stockholders (other than the receipt of fees for service on the Board of
Directors and its Committees), and which retained and was counseled by its own
separate independent legal counsel and investment banking firm. Messrs. Henry
and Daniel Sahakian abstained from voting with respect to the merger and the
merger agreement because of their interests in the merger. See "SPECIAL
FACTORS -- Recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee and Board of Directors."
In determining to recommend the merger and the merger agreement to the
Board of Directors, the Ad Hoc Committee considered a number of factors,
including:
- The business, financial results and prospects of Uni-Marts;
- The strength and resources of Uni-Marts' competitors, the state of the
economy, the substantial consolidation and inordinate number of
bankruptcy proceedings in the convenience store industry and Uni-Marts'
relative size and lack of capital resources;
- The expenses of reporting and compliance requirements of a public company
(approximately $850,000 per year) compared to the historically thin
trading volume of Uni-Marts' stock (approximately 2,300 shares per day
over the prior four years);
- The fact that the $2.25 price per share to be paid to the Public
Stockholders in the merger represents a premium over the market price of
Uni-Marts' stock prior to the approval of the merger agreement and is the
highest cash amount the Ad Hoc Committee believed could be obtained for
the stock; and
- Boenning & Scattergood's opinion (subject to the considerations and
limitations set forth therein) that the $2.25 price per share to be paid
in the merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to the
stockholders of Uni-Marts.
Each of these factors supported the decision of the Ad Hoc Committee and
the Board of Directors. The Ad Hoc Committee also consid-
3
ered a variety of risks and other potential detriments concerning the merger,
including:
- Following the merger, the Public Stockholders will cease to participate
in any future earnings growth of Uni-Marts or benefit from any increase
in the value of Uni-Marts or its assets;
- Under the terms of the merger agreement, Uni-Marts is unable to solicit
or encourage other acquisition proposals; and
- Certain equity owners of Green Valley have conflicts of interest because
of their continued employment and equity ownership in Green Valley
following the merger.
The Committee ultimately concluded that the positive factors of the merger
outweighed the negative factors. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Reasons for the Ad Hoc
Committee's Determination."
COMMON STOCK PRICE
Uni-Marts' common stock is listed on the American Stock Exchange under the
symbol "UNI." During the month before the Board of Directors received the draft
letter of intent from Green Valley to purchase Uni-Marts, the average closing
price of Uni-Marts' common stock was $1.67 per share. On January 26, 2004, the
day preceding the public announcement of the signing of the merger agreement,
the common stock closed at $1.97 per share. During the month prior to the date
of this proxy statement, the average closing price of Uni-Marts' common stock
was $ per share. See "MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDENDS ON COMMON STOCK."
FAIRNESS OPINION
Boenning & Scattergood delivered an opinion to the Ad Hoc Committee dated
January 26, 2004, and made a presentation to the Board of Directors that, based
on and subject to the assumptions, considerations and limitations set forth in
its opinion, the consideration to be received by Uni-Marts' stockholders in the
merger is fair, from a financial point of view. A copy of Boenning &
Scattergood's written opinion, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the review undertaken, is
attached as Annex C to this proxy statement. Stockholders are urged to read the
opinion in its entirety. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Opinion of Boenning &
Scattergood."
POSITION OF UNI-MARTS REGARDING THE PURPOSE OF THE MERGER
Uni-Marts' purpose for the merger is to provide the Public Stockholders
with liquidity for their shares at a price above the market trading price for
the shares. The shares are not actively traded and Uni-Marts lacks the capital
resources for significant growth. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Purposes of the
Merger."
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS
When you consider the recommendation of the Board of Directors to vote in
favor of the merger agreement and the merger, you should keep in mind that
certain members of the Board of Directors and members of their families and
other affiliates have interests in the merger that are different from the
interests of Uni-Marts' other stockholders. Henry Sahakian, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of Uni-Marts, Daniel Sahakian, a Director of
Uni-Marts, and Ara Kervandjian, President of Uni-Marts, are each Affiliated
Stockholders and have ownership interests in Green Valley. In addition, Frank R.
Orloski, Sr., a Director of Uni-Marts, and Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian and
Mr. Kervandjian are recipients of lease payments for certain of Uni-Marts'
properties. The Ad Hoc Committee and the Board of Directors were aware of these
potential conflicts of interest and considered them in evaluating and approving
the proposed merger. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Interests of Certain Persons."
POSITION OF THE GREEN VALLEY GROUP REGARDING THE FAIRNESS AND PURPOSE OF THE
MERGER
Each of the members of the Green Valley Group believe that the merger is
substantively and procedurally fair to the Public Stockholders based on the same
factors considered by the Ad Hoc Committee and the Board of Directors of
Uni-Marts, including that the merger provides the Public Stockholders with
liquidity for their shares, which are not otherwise actively traded, at a
premium above the market trading price for the shares prior to the announcement
of the proposed merger, and that Uni-Marts lacks the capital resources for
significant growth. In making their determination as to the fairness of the
merger to the Public Stockholders, each member of the Green Valley Group adopted
the analysis of the Board of Directors of Uni-Marts.
4
The purpose of the Green Valley Group in conducting this transaction is to
acquire all of Uni-Marts' common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior
to the closing of the merger. The members of Uni-Mart's management who are
owners of Green Valley believe that Uni-Mart's future business prospects can be
improved by working with the principal beneficial owners of KOTA Holdings and
receiving their collective active participation in the strategic direction and
operations of the merged entities. In addition, the members of the Green Valley
Group believe that Mr. Vakharia's access to capital sources may provide Green
Valley with development opportunities not currently available to Uni-Marts. Such
opportunities may include the ability to expand the existing business or to
obtain financing to acquire similar businesses. See "SPECIAL FACTORS
-- Position of Green Valley and the Green Valley Group Regarding the Fairness
and Purpose of the Merger."
PLANS OF THE GREEN VALLEY GROUP AFTER THE MERGER
Green Valley will initially continue the current operations of Uni-Marts'
business and maintain Uni-Marts' current credit facilities in their present
form. Green Valley also plans to evaluate a variety of future alternatives,
including the restructuring of these credit facilities, effecting another form
of recapitalization or debt restructuring, and selling and licensing stores. See
"SPECIAL FACTORS -- Plans of the Green Valley Group after the Merger."
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
If the merger is consummated, only those holders of Uni-Marts' common stock
who do not vote in favor of the merger will have certain rights under Section
262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law to demand appraisal of their shares.
Under Section 262, stockholders who demand appraisal of their shares and comply
with the applicable statutory procedures will be entitled to receive a judicial
determination of the fair value of their shares, exclusive of any element of
value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, and payment
of that fair value in cash, together with a fair rate of interest, if any. The
value so determined could be more or less than, or equal to, the price per share
to be paid in the merger. Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law is
included in this proxy statement as Annex D. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Rights of
Dissenting Stockholders of Uni-Marts."
COMPLETION OF THE MERGER
Uni-Marts is working to complete the merger as quickly as reasonably
possible. Uni-Marts expects to complete the merger, if it is approved by the
stockholders of Uni-Marts, within several days after the special meeting. See
"THE MERGER AGREEMENT -- The Merger."
CONDITIONS TO COMPLETION OF MERGER
Uni-Marts and Green Valley will not complete the merger unless several
conditions are satisfied or waived by Uni-Marts and Green Valley. These include:
- The merger agreement and the merger shall have been approved by the
requisite vote of the holders of Uni-Marts' common stock;
- No final restraining order or injunction or other final order issued by
any court or governmental entity preventing the consummation of the
merger shall be in effect;
- All governmental and other consents and approvals necessary to consummate
the merger shall have been obtained;
- Since September 30, 2003, there shall have been no events with respect to
Uni-Marts that constitute a material adverse effect on Uni-Marts;
- Uni-Marts will be in compliance with certain financial parameters at the
effective date of the merger;
- Uni-Marts shall have received estoppel certificates and consents from
each of its principal lenders; and
- Holders of less than 15% of Uni-Marts' shares elect dissenters' rights.
Any of the foregoing conditions may be waived by Green Valley except the
condition that the merger agreement and the merger be approved by the requisite
stockholder vote. See "THE MERGER AGREEMENT -- Conditions to the Merger."
REGULATORY FILINGS AND APPROVALS
Uni-Marts does not believe that any material federal or state regulatory
approvals, filings or notices are required by Uni-Marts with respect to
5
consummation of the merger other than (i) filings required under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), (ii) filing of (A) a
certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and
(B) articles of merger with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, and (iii) filings required by state licensing laws. See "SPECIAL
FACTORS -- Regulatory Approvals."
SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR THE MERGER
Since both Tri-Color and KOTA Holdings have agreed to contribute their
right to receive the cash merger consideration for shares of Uni-Marts' common
stock held by them, $9.3 million in cash will be required under the merger
agreement to purchase the remaining outstanding shares of Uni-Marts' common
stock owned by the Public Stockholders and to pay the cash amounts owed in
respect of stock options outstanding at the time of the consummation of the
merger. This amount will be paid from funds contributed to Green Valley by
Tri-Color and KOTA Holdings. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Source of Funds for the
Merger."
NO SOLICITATION OF OFFERS; NOTICE OF PROPOSAL FOR THIRD PARTIES
Uni-Marts has agreed in the merger agreement not to participate in or
initiate any action designed to facilitate a third party in acquiring Uni-Marts.
However, if a third party makes an unsolicited acquisition proposal, the Board
of Directors may, subject to specified conditions, respond to and negotiate with
the third party. See "THE MERGER AGREEMENT -- Covenants."
TERMINATION OF MERGER AGREEMENT
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the effective
time of the merger, whether before or after shareholder approval is obtained:
- By mutual written consent of Uni-Marts and Green Valley;
- By either Green Valley or Uni-Marts (i) if the merger has not been
consummated by July 31, 2004, or (ii) if any court or governmental entity
has issued a final, non-appealable order or ruling which restrains,
enjoins or otherwise prohibits the merger;
- By Uni-Marts if the Uni-Marts Board of Directors receives a superior
proposal that it determines to be fully financed, or if it convenes a
special stockholders meeting to approve the merger and fails to obtain
the requisite stockholder vote; or
- By Green Valley if the Uni-Marts' Board of Directors recommends to its
stockholders a superior proposal or withdraws its recommendation of the
merger, or if certain conditions to closing are not satisfied,
principally that holders of 15% or more of the Uni-Marts shares elect
dissenters' rights or Uni-Marts fails to meet designated financial
parameters.
If the merger agreement is terminated because holders of 15% or more of
Uni-Marts' shares elect dissenters' rights, Green Valley is required to commence
promptly a tender offer to purchase all outstanding Uni-Marts shares at a price
of $2.25 per share. If Green Valley acquires a majority of the Uni-Marts shares
pursuant to the tender offer and elects to deregister the shares, non-tendering
stockholders may lose all liquidity with respect to their shares, and Green
Valley will have the power to elect all members of Uni-Marts' Board of
Directors. See "THE MERGER AGREEMENT -- Termination."
EXPENSES AND TERMINATION FEES
Uni-Marts and Green Valley have agreed to pay their respective fees and
expenses in connection with the merger, whether or not the merger is
consummated, except that Green Valley is entitled to an $800,000 break-up fee if
Uni-Marts pursues a superior proposal, and Uni-Marts may recover up to $800,000
from Green Valley if the merger agreement is terminated because of a breach by
Green Valley of any representation, warranty or covenant. See "THE MERGER
AGREEMENT -- Expenses and Termination Fees."
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
For federal income tax purposes, the merger of Uni-Marts into Green Valley
will be treated as a sale of assets by Uni-Marts to Green Valley. The Public
Stockholders, the Tri-Color Members and KOTA Management will be treated for
federal income tax purposes as having sold their Uni-Marts stock for
consideration of $2.25 per share, which will trigger the recognition of a
taxable gain or loss. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Material United States Federal
Income Tax Consequences."
6
CERTAIN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING AND THE SPECIAL MEETING
Q: WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE ON THE MERGER PROPOSAL?
A: Stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 27, 2004 may vote
at the special meeting.
Q: WHAT DO I NEED TO DO NOW?
A: Please vote. You are invited to attend the special meeting, however, you
should mail your completed, signed and dated proxy card in the enclosed
envelope as soon as possible, so that your shares will be represented at
the special meeting in case you are unable to attend. No postage is
required if the proxy card is returned in the enclosed postage prepaid
envelope and mailed in the United States.
Q: HOW DO I VOTE MY SHARES?
A: The answer depends on whether you own your Uni-Marts' stock directly (that
is, you hold stock certificates that show your name as the registered
stockholder) or if your stock is held in a brokerage account or by another
nominee holder.
If you own Uni-Marts' shares directly: Your proxy is being solicited
directly by Uni-Marts, and you can vote by doing the following: (1) sign
and date the enclosed proxy card, (2) mark the boxes indicating how you
wish to vote, and (3) return the proxy card in the prepaid envelope
provided. If you sign your proxy card but do not indicate how you wish to
vote, the proxies will vote your shares "FOR" the adoption of the merger
agreement and approval of the merger. You can also vote in person if you
attend the meeting.
If you hold your Uni-Marts' shares through a broker, bank or other nominee:
You will receive voting instructions directly from the nominee telling you
how you can vote your shares. Ordinarily, you can vote by completing and
returning a voting instruction card provided by the nominee. You may also
be able to vote by telephone or via the Internet. Please refer to the
instructions provided by the nominee with your voting instruction card for
information about voting by telephone or via the Internet. If you hold your
shares through a nominee and want to vote at the meeting, you must obtain a
"legal proxy" from the nominee authorizing you to vote at the meeting.
Q: WHAT IF I WANT TO CHANGE MY VOTE OR REVOKE MY PROXY?
A: A registered stockholder may change his or her vote or revoke his or her
proxy at any time before the special meeting by notifying our Corporate
Secretary, Mary Ann Miller, in writing, at Uni-Marts' address, 477 East
Beaver Avenue, State College, PA 16801-5690, that you revoke your proxy or
by filing a duly executed proxy bearing a later date with Ms. Miller. You
may then vote in person at the special meeting or submit a new proxy card.
You may contact Mellon Investor Services LLC, Uni-Marts' transfer agent, at
800-756-3353 to get a new proxy card.
If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and wish to
change your vote, you must follow the procedures required by such nominee.
Q: WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF I RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE PROXY OR VOTING INSTRUCTION
CARD?
A: It means your shares are registered differently or are held in more than
one account. Please provide voting instructions for each proxy card that
you receive.
Q: WHO WILL COUNT THE VOTES?
A: Mellon Investor Services LLC, Uni-Marts' transfer agent, will count the
votes.
7
Q: WHAT IS THE EFFECT IF I FAIL TO GIVE INSTRUCTIONS TO MY BROKER?
A: If your shares are held by a broker, bank, or other nominee recordholder
and you sign but do not give instructions on the voting instruction card,
your nominee recordholder will not have authority to vote your shares. If a
nominee holding shares on behalf of a stockholder does not receive voting
instructions from the stockholder by a specified date before the special
meeting, the shares will be counted as present for purposes of determining
whether a quorum is present, but the shares will not be voted. This is
called a "broker non-vote." Brokers, banks and other nominees will not have
authority to vote on the merger proposal without instructions from the
stockholder. The effect of a broker non-vote on the outcome of the vote,
therefore, is the same as a vote against the merger proposal.
Q: WHAT IS THE EFFECT ON THE OUTCOME OF THE VOTE IF I ABSTAIN FROM VOTING?
A: Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the merger
proposal.
Q: WHO CAN ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING?
A: All stockholders are invited to attend the special meeting. If you plan to
attend the special meeting, please bring the admission ticket attached to
your proxy card. If you are a stockholder whose shares are not registered
in your own name and you plan to attend the special meeting, please bring a
copy of the voting instructions sent to you by your broker or other nominee
or other evidence of your stock ownership.
Q: ARE THERE ANY EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH COLLECTING THE STOCKHOLDER VOTES?
A: Uni-Marts will reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding
proxy and other materials to our stockholders. Uni-Marts does not
anticipate hiring an agency to solicit votes from stockholders at this
time. Uni-Marts may decide that it is appropriate to have a proxy
solicitation agency, in which case, the costs of such service will be paid
by Uni-Marts. Officers and other employees of Uni-Marts may solicit proxies
in person or by telephone but will receive no special compensation for
doing so.
Q: WILL ANY EMPLOYEES OR ASSETS OF UNI-MARTS BE EMPLOYED OR USED IN CONNECTION
WITH THE TRANSACTION?
A: Officers and employees of Uni-Marts are participating in the preparation of
this proxy statement, and Uni-Marts will pay its own expenses to consummate
the merger. Officers and employees of Uni-Marts may participate in the
preparation of other proxy solicitation materials, if necessary. As
described in the preceding answer, a proxy solicitation agency and/or
officers and other employees of Uni-Marts may be called upon to solicit
proxies in person or by telephone but will not receive any special
compensation for doing so. Other than the foregoing, Uni-Marts does not
expect its assets to be used in connection with the consummation of the
merger.
Q: WHAT HAPPENS IF I SELL MY UNI-MARTS SHARES BEFORE THE SPECIAL MEETING?
A: The record date for the special meeting is May 27, 2004, which is earlier
than the expected date of the merger. If you transfer your shares after the
record date but before the merger, you will retain your right to vote at
the special meeting, but the right to receive $2.25 in cash per share will
pass to the person to whom you transfer your shares.
Q: SHOULD I SEND IN MY STOCK CERTIFICATES NOW?
A: No. If the merger is completed, you will receive written instructions
explaining how to exchange your Uni-Marts stock certificates for cash.
8
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement contains certain forward-looking statements that
involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. These statements are based on
Uni-Marts' expectations, as of the date of this proxy statement, of future
events and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Such
statements may include statements regarding Uni-Marts' plans, strategies and
intentions or future financial performance, and frequently can be identified by
the use of terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "should" or
"anticipates" (or the negative or other variations thereof) or comparable
terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties.
Although Uni-Marts believes that its expectations are based on reasonable
assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge, Uni-Marts' stockholders are
cautioned that such statements are only projections and that actual events or
results may differ materially from those expressed in any such forward-looking
statements. In particular, Uni-Marts cannot assure you that the merger will be
consummated. The forward-looking statements contained in this proxy statement
include, but are not limited to, statements about the merger and expectations as
to Uni-Marts' future results. The following factors, among others, could cause
actual results to differ materially from those described herein: failure of the
requisite number of our stockholders to approve the merger; failure of Green
Valley or Uni-Marts to meet any condition to closing; litigation challenging the
merger; and other economic, business, competitive and/or regulatory factors
affecting our business generally, including, without limitation, the following:
- general economic, business and market conditions;
- environmental, tax and tobacco legislation or regulation;
- volatility of gasoline prices, margins and supplies; competition and
ability to maintain merchandising margins;
- the ability to successfully consummate Uni-Marts' divestiture program;
- the sufficiency of cash balances, cash from operations and cash from
asset sales to meet future cash obligations;
- volume of customer traffic;
- weather conditions;
- labor costs; and
- the level of capital expenditures.
Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
SPECIAL FACTORS
BACKGROUND OF THE MERGER
Uni-Marts' Board of Directors and its Strategic Planning Committee have
periodically evaluated our business and operations, as well as our strategic
direction and prospects. In the course of such an evaluation in early 2002,
Uni-Marts' Board of Directors considered the adverse impact on Uni-Marts' market
valuation that it attributed to, among other things, our capital constraints,
liquidity concerns due to covenant constraints imposed under our credit
facilities, and the level of competition in many of our markets.
On February 27, 2002, management presented to the Board of Directors an
analysis for the divestiture of all of our convenience stores except for a
limited number of stores which it intended to convert to Choice Cigarette
Discount Outlets. The total number of stores to be marketed for sale was 190,
including 115 owned and 75 leased locations, and the travel center located in
Milroy, Pennsylvania.
9
The Board of Directors determined to form a separate Ad Hoc Committee to
report to the Board of Directors on this divestiture strategy, and three
independent directors, Stephen Krumholz, Herbert Graves and Jack Najarian, were
appointed as the members of the Ad Hoc Committee. Richard Gallagher, a retired
CPA who had been an advisor to the Uni-Marts' Board of Directors since June
1998, was appointed as an advisor to the Ad Hoc Committee.
On March 15, 2002, Ara Kervandjian, President of Uni-Marts, and Greg
Petrick, Chief Financial Officer of Uni-Marts, met in Scottsdale, Arizona with
representatives of General Electric Capital Franchise Finance Corp of America
("GECFFC"), our principal long-term lender, to discuss our proposed divestiture
strategy. The representatives of GECFFC, while noting that the sale of a
significant part of our operations would require approval from all of the
holders of the indebtedness, indicated that they believed a transaction of this
type could receive lender support under the proposed financial parameters.
During March 2002, management and members of the Ad Hoc Committee conducted
interviews with various financial advisors for assistance in marketing 170 of
the stores (management had identified another party interested in marketing the
other 20 stores and travel center). Detailed presentations by several of these
advisors were made to the Ad Hoc Committee on March 26 and March 27, 2002, and
the Ad Hoc Committee, at a meeting held on April 2, 2002, selected Trefethen &
Company LLC and Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. to act as its financial advisors.
While our intention at this time was principally directed toward the sale of the
190 convenience stores, the financial advisors were charged to explore and
evaluate all strategic alternatives to enhance stockholder value, including a
business combination as well as the sale of assets. After receiving GECFFC's
support of our selection, we publicly announced the engagement of these
financial advisors on April 5, 2002.
For the next several months, our selected financial advisors worked with us
to prepare a confidential memorandum describing the 170 store locations being
offered for sale and distributed this memorandum, beginning in June 2002, to
interested parties as identified by the advisors and management. By July 2002,
we had received two written indications of interest for the purchase of the 170
locations. One came from The Kroger Co., which indicated its interest in
purchasing not only the business assets of the 170 marketed stores, but also 104
of these 170 real properties owned by Uni-Marts, for a cash price in the range
of $55 to $60 million (these 170 properties secured long-term indebtedness of
approximately $50.5 million). The other indication of interest came from United
Refining Company, which stated its interest in purchasing the inventories and
supplies of the 170 stores and leasing the real estate and equipment for an
aggregate net lease amount to Uni-Marts of $6.5 million per year (with United
Refining also assuming the rental payments on properties leased by Uni-Marts).
The Ad Hoc Committee, at a meeting held on July 23, 2002, reviewed these
two responses as well as a summary of several other expressions of interest in
specific groups of stores. The Ad Hoc Committee discussed that the confidential
memorandum offered to sell the business assets of 170 of Uni-Marts' convenience
stores (including inventory, supplies and the Uni-Mart(TM) brand name), but
Uni-Marts was not offering to sell the real estate owned by Uni-Marts at 104 of
the 170 locations (the other 66 locations were leased by Uni-Marts). Since the
Kroger indication of interest included the purchase of the 104 parcels of real
property owned by Uni-Marts, and since the United Refining indication of
interest did not set forth a price for the business assets at the 170 marketed
stores, the Ad Hoc Committee instructed its financial advisors to contact United
Refining and Kroger to request that they revise their offers to conform to the
parameters set forth in the confidential memorandum. The financial advisors also
were asked to gauge Kroger's interest in purchasing Uni-Marts in its entirety.
At this meeting, Mr. Kervandjian reported that he had been contacted by Jim
Haseotes, a major stockholder of a convenience store operator (Cumberland Farms)
whose family limited partnership owned close to 10% of Uni-Marts' common stock.
Mr. Haseotes had orally indicated his interest in purchasing Uni-Marts for "book
value" if it did not receive a more attractive offer. On July 21, 2002, Mr.
Kervandjian had met with Mr. Haseotes and his son to explore their interest in
clarifying their offer or, alternatively, in partnering with management to make
an offer to purchase Uni-Marts. Mr. Graves reported that he had been contacted
by Michael Kelly, attorney for Mr. Haseotes, who reiterated the oral book value
offer for Uni-Marts. It was not clear to Messrs. Kervandjian and Graves whether
the oral offer of book value included goodwill recorded on our
10
balance sheet, nor was it clear whether or not the oral offer represented an
amount before or after payment of Uni-Marts' severance obligations upon sale. We
instructed our counsel to contact Mr. Kelly for clarification. By the time of
the Board of Directors meeting later on the day of July 23, 2002, counsel had
spoken to Mr. Kelly, who orally confirmed that Mr. Haseotes' book value oral
offer was intended to be net of any transaction-related obligations, including
change-in-control agreements and payments under our transaction success bonus
plan and any option spread values. Mr. Kelly later confirmed that "book value"
was intended to mean tangible book value, and not include goodwill.
The Board of Directors instructed counsel to continue to request a written
offer from Mr. Haseotes with a clear indication of what amount was being
offered, and concluded that at least one member of the Ad Hoc Committee would
participate in clarifying offers, together with the financial advisors, to
protect the integrity of the process to assure the independent evaluation of the
alternatives by the Ad Hoc Committee.
We never received a written offer from Mr. Haseotes, and Kroger did not
respond to the financial advisors' request to modify its offer. United Refining,
however, amended its indication of interest in August 2002 to present an offer
for the business assets of the 170 marketed stores for a price in the range of
$25 to $35 million, plus the purchase of the stores' inventories at cost and
some undisclosed form of master lease arrangement for the properties. Our
financial advisors were instructed by the Ad Hoc Committee to seek to narrow the
price range and clarify the proposed master lease arrangement, and our financial
advisors held many discussions with United Refining's financial advisors, Hill
Street Capital, but were unable to receive a definitive purchase offer for the
stores.
During the period from late July through August 2002, management also
discussed with the Ad Hoc Committee the possibility of selling the real property
as well as the business assets of 100 of our stores through our financial
advisors. In September 2002, we engaged a business broker, Avatar Business
Connections, Inc., to market the business assets of 70 other stores.
United Refining continued its due diligence investigation of our stores
during this period and, on September 30, 2002, notified the Board of Directors
in writing (through its affiliate, Red Apple Group), that it now preferred to
pursue the purchase of all outstanding Uni-Marts stock, and was "prepared in
principle" to pay a per share value in the range of $3.00 to $4.00 subject to
further investigation and its ability to assume Uni-Marts' existing debt. The Ad
Hoc Committee met on October 2, 2002 to review the United Refining letter. One
of our financial advisors who was present at the meeting, Bill Trefethen,
recommended that the next action be to contact United Refining's financial
advisors to narrow the range of the proposed consideration and clarify the
timing of United's due diligence and financing questions. Mr. Trefethen also
reported that once such clarifications had been received, a meeting should be
scheduled between the parties, and the Ad Hoc Committee advised that either Mr.
Krumholz or Mr. Najarian would be present in addition to management at any such
meeting. On the same date, our counsel sent a letter to John Catsimatidis,
Chairman and CEO of Red Apple Group, expressing the sentiments of the Ad Hoc
Committee and asking that the parties attempt to negotiate a draft of the
definitive acquisition agreement, as well as have United Refining convert its
per share valuation range to a precise offer, prior to the Uni-Marts Board of
Directors' next regularly scheduled meeting on October 30, 2002. Greg Petrick
also sent a letter to Mark Wood of GECFFC asking him to discuss prospective
financing strategies with United Refining and its affiliates concerning the
potential acquisition of Uni-Marts.
At the meeting on October 30, 2002, the Board of Directors was advised that
negotiations had not been successful in converting United Refining's indication
of interest for Uni-Marts into a detailed offer. Henry Sahakian, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Uni-Marts, also advised the Board of Directors that
based on preliminary results, it appeared that we would report a net loss of
approximately $1.3 million, or $0.19 per share, for our fiscal year ended
September 30, 2002, as compared to a profit of $451,000, or $0.06 per share, for
fiscal 2001. Mr. Petrick explained to the Board of Directors that based on
forecasts of fourth quarter results, Uni-Marts would not be in compliance with
certain loan pool covenants with GECFFC nor with certain covenants under its
revolving line of credit with Provident Bank. Meetings had been held with both
lenders to discuss amendments or waiver of covenant defaults and to update them
11
on our divestiture initiatives. Mr. Petrick also explained that in light of our
inability to successfully divest stores in a large group, management had begun
to discuss with GECFFC a plan to sell stores in smaller groups and use the
proceeds to pay down debt. Management also requested the Board of Directors'
approval to allow certain members of management to evaluate a management buyout
of Uni-Marts. The Board of Directors authorized management and the Ad Hoc
Committee to pursue each of these alternatives, namely the sale of individual
stores, and the sale of Uni-Marts either to a third party or to management.
The Ad Hoc Committee next met on December 11, 2002 with management, who
reported that Uni-Marts' October and November financial performance had
continued to deteriorate compared to budget and to the comparable months in the
previous fiscal year. Mr. Krumholz also reported on his meeting with Bill
Trefethen and management on the previous day, during which management and Mr.
Trefethen had noted their difficulties in negotiating amendments of loan
documents with GECFFC necessary to accommodate our strategy of selling stores in
smaller groups. Management recommended that Uni-Marts illustrate to GECFFC the
potential adverse financial impact on both Uni-Marts and our lenders if we were
unable to execute our divestiture plan in a timely manner. In the absence of a
new arrangement regarding our long-term debt, the divestitures of smaller groups
of stores would result in substantial loan prepayment penalties and generate
minimal excess cash proceeds for Uni-Marts. Virtually all of Uni-Marts'
long-term debt is held by GECFFC with approximately half on a fixed rate basis
and half on a variable rate basis. Repayment of the variable rate debt requires
prepayment penalties ranging from 3% to 5% of the amount outstanding. Repayment
of the fixed rate debt requires a yield maintenance payment based on the present
value of the principal and interest payments calculated using current
reinvestment rates and time remaining until maturity. In order to repay all
outstanding debt of Uni-Marts, prepayment penalties and yield maintenance costs
would total approximately $7 million. Uni-Marts was seeking a substantial
reduction in these debt retirement costs to improve the cash proceeds from the
divestitures of stores. The Ad Hoc Committee authorized management, with the
assistance of its attorneys and financial advisors, to develop a financial model
to present to GECFFC.
Management then prepared a presentation summarizing convenience store
industry conditions, Uni-Marts' recent deteriorating financial performance, our
divestiture strategies and a restructuring proposal for our long-term debt, and
Messrs. Kervandjian and Petrick and George Cerminara, a financial consultant to
Uni-Marts, met with representatives of GECFFC on December 23, 2002 in
Scottsdale, Arizona to review this presentation. Various alternatives were
discussed, including the classification of Uni-Marts in a "special servicing"
category to permit GECFFC more authority to amend certain provisions in the
long-term debt instruments and allow us to sell stores, prepay debt and build a
cash reserve. The GECFFC representatives agreed to provide us with a proposal
shortly. The Ad Hoc Committee met on December 26, 2002 to discuss these
developments and to address our current engagement of financial advisors that
was due to expire on December 31, 2002. The Ad Hoc Committee decided that we
should not continue the existing engagement, since the original strategy of a
single divestiture of approximately 170 stores had not been successful and the
new strategy of a series of divestitures of smaller groups of stores would
require different advisory services. Management believed that we required
assistance with our negotiations with our long-term lenders to amend the current
debt instruments in order to effectuate the newly-evolving store divestiture
strategy, and the Ad Hoc Committee authorized Uni-Marts to begin negotiations
with Trefethen & Company independently for a new advisory relationship relating
to its lender negotiations as opposed to its marketing of assets (with an
emphasis on a success fee format). Mr. Trefethen was selected due to his
extensive convenience store industry expertise and his knowledge of transactions
with GECFFC. The new advisory relationship was entered into with Trefethen &
Company on January 7, 2003.
On January 19, 2003, we received a term sheet from GECFFC for a consensual
restructuring of our long-term debt, and a meeting was arranged at the lender's
offices in Scottsdale, Arizona on February 3, 2003. Attending the meeting for
Uni-Marts were Messrs. Kervandjian, Petrick and Cerminara, and David Antzis, a
partner of the law firm of Saul Ewing LLP, our principal outside counsel.
Immediately prior to the meeting with GECFFC, these individuals participated in
a conference call with the members of the
12
Ad Hoc Committee to review various aspects of the GECFFC term sheet and discuss
how best to restructure the long-term debt arrangement. Negotiations with GECFFC
continued throughout February and March 2003.
In the interim, United Refining renewed its overtures to acquire Uni-Marts.
Management provided United Refining with various requested information,
including a list of Uni-Marts' unencumbered assets (real estate and equipment)
and the net book value thereof, culminating in a letter sent by e-mail from
Martin Bring, counsel for United Refining, to Mr. Antzis on February 26, 2003,
stating that United Refining was now prepared in principle to pay $2.25 per
share in cash for all Uni-Marts stock. The letter was again subject to
satisfactory completion of United's due diligence and assumption of existing
debt, and stated that the purchase price would be financed by a combination of
corporate liquidity and other resources provided by United Refining, its
affiliates and their respective lenders. On February 27, 2003 and February 28,
2003, Uni-Marts' Board of Directors received two separate letters from Michael
Kelly, counsel for the Haseotes family partnership, expressing support for
United's offer and urging that the Ad Hoc Committee conduct the negotiations
with United Refining.
The Ad Hoc Committee met on February 28, 2003 to discuss the February 26,
2003 letter from United Refining. The Ad Hoc Committee discussed that if the
latest United letter resulted in an offer, the Committee would need to retain
independent financial advisors and counsel to assist the Committee in evaluating
the offer. Members of the Committee were concerned that the letter of interest
from United Refining might not result in a definitive offer, noting that United
Refining did not produce an offer after its letter of interest in the fall of
2002 and that Uni-Marts had spent a considerable amount of time and money on
United Refining's due diligence process at that time. The Ad Hoc Committee
instructed Mr. Antzis to work with Mr. Krumholz to draft a written response to
United Refining requesting financing information that demonstrated United
Refining's ability to consummate a transaction, and that Uni-Marts would
accommodate further due diligence after receiving satisfactory evidence of
United Refining's financing. Such a letter was sent on March 3, 2003.
Thereafter, a letter dated March 21, 2003 from Fleet National Bank to United
Refining was provided to the Ad Hoc Committee indicating that Fleet was willing
to work closely with United Refining management to explore the possibility of
acting as sole arranger and/or underwriter for a bank facility to finance the
acquisition of Uni-Marts, subject to completion of satisfactory due diligence,
Fleet's credit review and approval process and a number of other conditions. By
letter from Mr. Krumholz to Henry Sahakian dated March 25, 2003, management was
advised that the Ad Hoc Committee believed the Fleet letter provided by United
Refining was a sufficient indication of its financing prospects to permit a
continued due diligence investigation of Uni-Marts, and that the Ad Hoc
Committee had given Mr. Petrick the authority to coordinate the assembly of any
further information requested by United Refining. We provided a similar letter
from Mr. Antzis to United Refining on the same date, and Mr. Petrick received an
additional due diligence request from United Refining on March 31, 2003.
In its letter to United Refining on March 3, 2003, Uni-Marts had requested
that United Refining convert its indication of interest into a firm offer, and
had stated that meaningful negotiation could not take place until such an offer
was submitted. United Refining never responded to this request (until submitting
a letter of intent in May 2003 as discussed below), and instead United Refining
simply pursued its financing and due diligence activities. In the meantime, we
continued to act to advance our asset divestiture strategy. Effective April 1,
2003, Provident Bank agreed to amend its revolving credit facility with
Uni-Marts (i) to extend the maturity from April 20, 2004 to December 31, 2004,
(ii) to extend the seasonal line of credit increase of $2 million through April
30, 2004, and (iii) to amend certain financial covenants to align them with our
divestiture plan. On April 22, 2003, GECFFC signed a term sheet to release 117
of our store locations from its loan pools for a period of approximately 18
months, thereby reducing prepayment penalties and other restrictive conditions
of the loans in their then current form. We also entered into two separate asset
sale agreements in April 2003 to sell four Virginia stores and 18 other stores,
respectively.
13
The Ad Hoc Committee interviewed several law firms during late April and
early May 2003 to serve as its independent counsel, and the Ad Hoc Committee
determined to retain Rhoads & Sinon LLP on May 15, 2003 as counsel to the Ad Hoc
Committee.
On April 30, 2003, Martin Bring, counsel for United Refining, delivered by
facsimile transmission to Mr. Antzis a financing commitment letter from Fleet
National Bank. Mr. Antzis informed Mr. Bring that Uni-Marts had recently entered
into an agreement to sell a number of convenience stores. Mr. Antzis also
advised Mr. Bring that United Refining's ongoing due diligence without the
submission of a formal offer was causing a burden on Uni-Marts' internal
resources. Mr. Antzis again inquired whether a formal offer would be
forthcoming. On May 12, 2003, United Refining submitted a letter of intent for a
cash merger with Uni-Marts at a price of $2.25 per share. On May 14, 2003, HFL
Corporation, a privately-held corporation controlled by Henry and Daniel
Sahakian, submitted to the Ad Hoc Committee its letter of intent for the
acquisition of all Uni-Marts common stock, also at a cash price of $2.25 per
share. HFL had held a Board of Directors meeting on April 21, 2003 to discuss
the possibility of making a proposal for the purchase of all of the outstanding
shares of Uni-Marts, and had signed a confidentiality agreement with Uni-Marts
on April 22, 2003. Between April 22 and May 14, 2003, HFL formulated its offer
letter after review of publicly available information and the outstanding number
of Uni-Marts' shares not already owned by the Tri-Color Members. Since Henry and
Daniel Sahakian were already directors and Henry Sahakian was an executive
officer of Uni-Marts, there was no need for any additional formal due diligence
as would customarily be performed by an unrelated third party. The first time
the HFL Board met to consider making a proposal was April 21, 2003.
On May 15, 2003, the Ad Hoc Committee met to discuss the letters of intent
from United Refining and HFL. Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian were not members
of the Ad Hoc Committee and did not participate in this meeting or subsequent
meetings of the Ad Hoc Committee in May 2003 to evaluate the United Refining and
HFL offers. The negative features of each letter of intent were discussed. The
negative aspects of the United Refining letter of intent were that it was a
non-binding proposal to acquire Uni-Marts, it contained a standstill provision
preventing Uni-Marts not only from seeking any other merger partner, but from
selling any stores, through June 30, 2003, it did not state whether the
definitive merger agreement would contain a financing contingency and it was
also still subject to United's satisfactory completion of due diligence in its
sole discretion. The negative aspects of the HFL letter of intent were that it
required the payment of a $2.5 million break-up fee due upon the signing by
Uni-Marts of an agreement for a fundamental transaction with any other party.
The Ad Hoc Committee concluded that it was not in a position to immediately
accept either offer because the Ad Hoc Committee had no basis to determine
whether $2.25 per share was an adequate or fair price for the unaffiliated
stockholders, and that the Ad Hoc Committee needed to engage an investment
banking firm to advise the Ad Hoc Committee on the fairness of these proposals
from a financial point of view. Charles Ferry, a partner of the law firm Rhoads
& Sinon, was instructed to draft a response letter to each of United Refining
and HFL, informing them that the Ad Hoc Committee would be consulting with an
investment banking firm.
Following its receipt of the offer from HFL, the Ad Hoc Committee directed
counsel to the Committee to communicate with counsel to United Refining in
writing indicating the manner in which United Refining's letter of intent would
need to be revised in order to be considered further by the Committee. Counsel
to the Ad Hoc Committee, by letter dated May 16, 2003, advised counsel to United
that in order to be considered further by the Ad Hoc Committee, United Refining
needed to submit a revised letter of intent which would constitute a binding
proposal and state whether or not a definitive merger agreement would be subject
to a financing contingency or other material contingency, in addition to
shareholder and regulatory approvals. The letter from counsel to the Ad Hoc
Committee also advised that a revised proposal from United Refining should
indicate what additional due diligence, if any, would be required by United
Refining prior to executing a definitive agreement and set forth a timeframe in
which that due diligence would be completed. The letter also requested that any
revised and binding proposal from United Refining be received no later than May
22 in order to be considered by the Ad Hoc Committee at the same time it was
considering the offer from HFL.
14
On May 23, 2003, the Ad Hoc Committee interviewed three investment banking
firms and ultimately selected Boenning & Scattergood, Inc. to advise the Ad Hoc
Committee as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of any transaction
transferring control of a material interest in Uni-Marts or our assets. Such
selection was in part based on Scattergood's focus on mergers and acquisitions
in middle market companies and the level of experience of the team assigned to
the project. Several days later, Mr. Ferry contacted Robert Young, a partner of
the law firm McCausland, Keen and Buckman and counsel for HFL, to request an
extension of time to respond to HFL's letter of intent, since the letter expired
by its own terms at the close of business on May 28, 2003. HFL was unwilling to
extend the letter of intent and the Ad Hoc Committee met on May 28, 2003 to
consider the offer. Given the absence of any due diligence contingency or
standstill provision in the HFL offer, Mr. Ferry was authorized to negotiate the
HFL letter with the goals of (1) substantially reducing the amount of the
break-up fee, (2) providing that the break-up fee would only be due upon
consummation of a transaction with a third party, as opposed to the signing of
an agreement with a third party, (3) requiring that a definitive agreement be
signed with HFL by June 30, 2003, and (4) conditioning Uni-Marts' obligation to
enter into an agreement on the receipt of a fairness opinion indicating that the
$2.25 cash price was fair from a financial point of view to Uni-Marts'
stockholders. The parties continued to negotiate before and during a Board of
Directors meeting held later that day, and ultimately HFL agreed to reduce the
break-up fee to $1.5 million, payable only upon the consummation of a third
party transaction within six months of the termination of the letter of intent,
and that the letter of intent would expire if the Ad Hoc Committee did not
receive a fairness opinion or a definitive agreement was not signed by June 27,
2003. Mr. Ferry was authorized to revise the letter of intent with Mr. Young for
execution as soon as possible. Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian participated in
the May 28, 2003 Board meeting to discuss the offer from HFL and the requested
changes to such offer by the Ad Hoc Committee, but they excused themselves from
the meeting while the Board discussed the United Refining offer and abstained
from any Board vote on either transaction.
On May 29, 2003, Mr. Ferry received a telephone call and revised draft
proposal from United Refining. The new proposal did not contain any material
changes or eliminate any of the contingencies set forth in United Refining's
proposal of May 12, 2003. The Ad Hoc Committee met on June 2, 2003 and reviewed
with counsel the failure of United Refining's revised proposal to address any of
the Committee's prior concerns. The Ad Hoc Committee determined that the HFL
letter of intent was preferable to the United Refining letter of intent even
though the revised HFL letter of intent contained a $1.5 million break-up fee
with a 6-month trailing provision, because the United Refining letter of intent
had not been revised by United and still contained the negative features
discussed above. Specifically, the United Refining letter of intent still
constituted a non-binding proposal, required that Uni-Marts negotiate
exclusively with United Refining through June 30, 2003, was subject to United
Refining's satisfactory completion of due diligence in its sole discretion and
did not state whether a definitive merger agreement would contain a financing
contingency. The HFL letter of intent also required HFL to pay a $250,000 cash
deposit at the time of signing the letter of intent which was nonrefundable if
HFL did not proceed to close a transaction for any reason except (1) the failure
of the parties to execute a definitive merger agreement, (2) the failure of the
Uni-Marts Board of Directors to amend Uni-Marts' shareholder rights plan to
permit a transaction with HFL to be consummated, or (3) the failure of
Uni-Marts' lenders to consent to HFL assuming Uni-Marts' outstanding debt
obligations. The Committee approved the final version of the letter of intent
with HFL and the letter was signed late that day and publicly announced the
following morning.
In the days following the execution of the letter of intent, principals of
HFL contacted representatives of GECFFC and Provident Bank to determine whether
such lenders would permit HFL to assume the indebtedness of Uni-Marts. HFL was
advised by Provident that it would likely require some form of personal
guarantees of the principals of HFL or performance milestones as a condition to
providing consent to the assumption of its indebtedness because of HFL's
privately-held status, and the fact that following the proposed merger HFL would
be highly-leveraged. In addition, Provident indicated that it might insist upon
the right to require HFL or its principals to contribute additional capital to
Uni-Marts under designated performance milestones. Representatives of HFL called
Mr. Krumholz on June 17, 2003 to advise him that HFL had decided to terminate
the letter of intent because HFL's principals were not
15
willing to provide personal guarantees or to agree to capital calls in order to
obtain Provident's consent. Mr. Krumholz had Mr. Ferry speak to a Provident
representative, who confirmed that it was highly likely that Provident would
impose such conditions. The letter of intent between Uni-Marts and HFL was
terminated on June 18, 2003.
Mr. Ferry called Mr. Bring on June 18, 2003 to advise him of the
termination of the HFL letter of intent, in order to ascertain whether United
Refining was interested in resuming merger discussions. Mr. Bring expressed some
concern on behalf of United Refining as to whether Uni-Marts' lenders would
impose the same personal guarantee requirement on any private third party
purchaser. Mr. Ferry suggested a face-to-face meeting between representatives of
the Ad Hoc Committee and United Refining, but United Refining never
affirmatively responded to the invitation for further discussions.
Thereafter, we renewed our store divestiture efforts. At approximately the
same time, the potential buyer of 18 of our stores introduced Messrs. Sahakian
and Kervandjian to Mr. Raj Vakharia, who expressed interest in acquiring all of
our remaining convenience stores in Pennsylvania (107 stores, of which 63 were
owned and 44 were leased) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $34
million. Mr. Vakharia's counsel submitted a draft asset purchase agreement and a
negotiating meeting was held on July 16, 2003 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
among Mr. Vakharia, Mr. Kervandjian and counsel for the parties. By the time of
the meeting, the potential purchaser of the 18 stores had terminated its
agreement with Uni-Marts, and Mr. Vakharia was negotiating for the purchase of
125 stores for an aggregate price of approximately $41.9 million. We objected to
certain of the proposed terms of the transaction, principally that the buyer
desired to purchase the stores in three separate transactions over an extended
period of time (approximately 18 months), with very little financial exposure to
the buyer if it did not elect to consummate the purchase of any group of stores,
but with the effect of preventing us from marketing any of these stores to other
parties during such extended period of time.
In early August 2003, Mr. Vakharia approached Mr. Paul Levinsohn, a
business associate, to assist with the transaction. At the same time, Messrs.
Vakharia and Levinsohn indicated that they were interested in submitting a
proposal to acquire Uni-Marts. In order to pursue this alternative, however,
they requested an exclusive period of time to conduct due diligence and
negotiate a definitive acquisition agreement. Mr. Vakharia discussed these
issues at a meeting in New York City on August 6, 2003 with Messrs. Henry
Sahakian, Kervandjian and Najarian. The Ad Hoc Committee met by conference call
on August 8, 2003, during which Mr. Najarian advised the Ad Hoc Committee of his
meeting with Mr. Vakharia and the fact that Mr. Vakharia had engaged the
investment banking firm of Piper Jaffray to raise additional funds for the
transaction. Mr. Vakharia then joined the conference call, accompanied by his
counsel, Peter Ehrenberg of the law firm of Lowenstein Sandler PC, and Scott
LaRue and John Barrymore of Piper Jaffray, to discuss an exclusivity arrangement
between Uni-Marts and the proposed buying entity controlled by Mr. Vakharia,
Reliance Management LLC. The parties engaged in a negotiating session, with the
Ad Hoc Committee ultimately agreeing to provide Reliance with an approximately
45-day exclusivity period in exchange for a $250,000 cash deposit which would
not be refundable except in limited circumstances (principally tied to due
diligence problems uncovered by Reliance or if Reliance ultimately offered $1.90
per share or more for all of the outstanding shares of Uni-Marts' common stock
and such offer was not accepted by Uni-Marts). Noting that Uni-Marts had not
been successful in selling groups of stores and United Refining had not
positively responded to invitations for additional discussions, the Ad Hoc
Committee instructed counsel to complete the negotiation of an exclusivity
agreement with Reliance. The Board of Directors approved the exclusivity
arrangement at a special meeting held on August 13, 2003.
Counsel for the parties continued their negotiation of the exclusivity
agreement, including issues relating to the conditions under which the cash
deposit would or would not be returned to Reliance, and when buyer's
environmental due diligence would occur. A meeting was arranged on August 25,
2003, in Florham Park, New Jersey, at the offices of The Kushner Companies.
Attending the meeting were all members of the Ad Hoc Committee, Messrs. Henry
Sahakian, Kervandjian, Antzis, Ehrenberg, Vakharia and Charles Ramat of The
Kushner Companies, a potential investor in Reliance. The parties compromised on
open issues by agreeing to eliminate Uni-Marts' demand for a cash deposit in
return for Reliance's
16
agreement not to be reimbursed for environmental due diligence expenses if it
discovered environmental issues that caused it to terminate the transaction. The
parties also agreed to extend the exclusivity period from September 27, 2003
until October 10, 2003, and instructed counsel to revise the draft agreement
accordingly.
Throughout September and early October 2003, Reliance performed its due
diligence investigation of Uni-Marts and the parties negotiated a definitive
merger agreement. The disputed issues relating to the merger agreement included
(a) whether the buyer would be entitled to post-closing indemnification for
breaches of Uni-Marts' representations and warranties, (b) whether a portion of
the merger price would be escrowed to secure this indemnification, (c)
Uni-Marts' ability to accept a superior proposal, and the break-up fee payable
to the buyer in such event, (d) buyer's desire to obtain a certain level of
voting lock-up agreements, (e) the capitalization of Reliance, and (f) various
conditions to closing, including environmental remediation above a certain
dollar threshold and the maximum percentage of stockholders electing appraisal
rights. The Ad Hoc Committee held meetings on September 25, September 30, and
October 9, 2003 to discuss these issues. The September 25 meeting was attended
not only by the members of the Ad Hoc Committee and Mr. Ferry, but also by
representatives of Uni-Marts' management and Uni-Marts' counsel, Mr. Vakharia
and several of his associates and Mr. Ehrenberg to negotiate various aspects of
the merger agreement. Mr. Vakharia indicated that Reliance intended to propose a
cash merger price of $1.90 per share, and the Affiliated Stockholders indicated
that they were prepared to sign voting agreements supporting the merger at that
price. There were a number of other conference calls among principals and
counsel and exchanges of comments to the merger agreement during this time
period. At the Ad Hoc Committee meeting on October 9, 2003, Mr. Krumholz
indicated that Reliance had requested an extension of their exclusivity period
from October 10 until October 17, 2003, and in light of the substantial progress
in negotiations to date, he recommended that such extension be granted. The
extension was permitted, and negotiations among counsel and the principals
continued, together with two additional Ad Hoc Committee meetings on October 13
and October 16, 2003 to discuss the Committee's negotiating positions on
Uni-Marts' behalf. At the meeting on October 16, 2003, the Ad Hoc Committee
agreed to extend the exclusivity period with Reliance until the close of
business on October 22, 2003.
The Ad Hoc Committee met again on October 21, 2003. Mr. Ferry explained
that Reliance was insisting that it obtain a certain level of environmental
remediation insurance as a condition to closing, and it was not sure whether it
would be required to conduct Phase II environmental testing in order to obtain
such insurance. Reliance also was insisting that it be entitled to the
reimbursement of its costs in the event that it terminated the merger agreement
if the underwriting criteria of its insurance company required Phase II
environmental testing and Uni-Marts refused to permit such testing. The parties
also had became aware of a pending claim against Uni-Marts, and after
negotiations between the Ad Hoc Committee and Reliance, the Committee agreed to
a reduction in the price per share to $1.87 to reflect the potential adverse
impact of such claim to the surviving entity in the merger. In light of these
and other issues, the Ad Hoc Committee decided that while it would allow the
negotiations to continue, it would not extend the exclusivity agreement with
Reliance beyond October 22, 2003. In addition, on October 23, 2003, Mr. Ramat
called Mr. Krumholz and other members of Uni-Marts' negotiating team to inform
them that Reliance now intended to obtain representation and warranty insurance
to insure breaches of representations and warranties by Uni-Marts and that
obtaining such insurance would be reflected in the merger agreement as another
condition precedent to Reliance's obligation to consummate the merger. Mr.
Ehrenberg also informed Mr. Krumholz in a telephone conversation on October 24,
2003, that Reliance was very concerned about the amount of prepayment penalties
which could be incurred by Reliance under Uni-Marts' long-term debt agreements
upon the sale of stores following the closing of the merger transaction. At a
Uni-Marts' Board of Directors meeting held on October 24, 2003, Messrs. Antzis
and Ferry were instructed to notify legal counsel for Reliance that Uni-Marts
was willing to continue to negotiate the transaction without exclusivity, and
that Reliance should devote the time necessary to complete its due diligence,
identify any further issues, obtain commitments for its insurance requirements
and then contact Uni-Marts when it was prepared to execute an agreement with
very few conditions to closing.
17
On October 27, 2003, Messrs. Ferry, Ehrenberg, Krumholz and Uni-Marts
counsel conferred via telephone conference call regarding the outstanding
issues. Mr. Antzis received a subsequent telephone call from Mr. Ehrenberg on
October 30, 2003, during which Mr. Ehrenberg advised Mr. Antzis that Reliance
had determined that it required the signing of a definitive merger agreement
before it would devote resources toward obtaining binding commitments for the
environmental insurance and representation and warranty insurance. Mr. Krumholz
had several telephone discussions with Mr. Ferry and representatives of
Uni-Marts management and Uni-Marts counsel on October 30 and October 31, 2003,
and as a result of these conversations, Mr. Ferry was instructed to prepare a
response in writing to Reliance's counsel outlining the Ad Hoc Committee's
positions with regard to the open issues raised by Mr. Ehrenberg. Mr. Ferry sent
this letter to Mr. Ehrenberg on November 3, 2003, after an Ad Hoc Committee
meeting on the same date to review Mr. Ferry's letter. At the request of
Reliance, a meeting was then held in State College, Pennsylvania on November 11,
2003. Messrs. Krumholz and Graves attended the meeting in person, and Mr.
Najarian participated by conference call. Also in attendance were Messrs. Ferry,
Antzis, Ehrenberg, Henry and Daniel Sahakian, Kervandjian and Petrick, together
with Mr. Ramat and Charles Kushner of The Kushner Companies. At the meeting, Mr.
Kushner stated that Reliance would require an extension of the exclusivity
period until January 9, 2004, because it believed that such period of time was
necessary for Reliance to obtain commitments for environmental and
representation and warranty insurance and Reliance was unwilling to commit funds
to these efforts without a continuing exclusivity arrangement. The Ad Hoc
Committee met on November 11, 2003, immediately following the meeting with
Reliance, and determined that Reliance could either continue to negotiate
without exclusivity or, in the alternative, the Committee would consider signing
a definitive agreement after a preliminary meeting with GECFFC to determine its
level of support for the assumption of debt by Reliance, and provided that the
definitive agreement was revised to eliminate many of the conditions to closing
as well as all instances of expense reimbursement to Reliance except in the case
of a superior proposal being accepted by Uni-Marts. Mr. Krumholz called Mr.
Kushner on November 12, 2003 to discuss these alternatives, and counsel for
Reliance delivered a new draft agreement which was then reviewed by the Ad Hoc
Committee at a meeting on November 17, 2003. Since many of the changes requested
by the Ad Hoc Committee were not reflected in the draft provided by Reliance's
counsel, including the elimination of significant conditions to closing, Mr.
Ferry was instructed to draft a revised version of the merger agreement and send
it to Reliance's counsel. Mr. Ferry sent the revised version several days later,
and received no response to the new draft.
In the spring of 2003, D. Christopher Ohly, an attorney with the law firm
Blank Rome LLP and counsel to Nancy Ordoukhanian-Ohanissan, Armineh
Ordoukhanian-Petrossian, Linda Ordoukhanian and Elsa Ordoukhanian, who
(according to an amendment to a Schedule 13D filed in February 2002)
collectively owned 838,468 shares or approximately 11.7% of the outstanding
shares of common stock of Uni-Marts, had contacted Uni-Marts' counsel to inquire
whether Uni-Marts had any interest in purchasing his clients' Uni-Marts stock.
He was advised that Uni-Marts was not in a financial position to make such a
purchase. In a letter dated June 11, 2003, Mr. Ohly requested on behalf of his
clients an opportunity to review certain books and records of Uni-Marts, and
after having his clients execute a confidentiality agreement, he was provided
with the requested Uni-Marts information. Approximately one month later, Mr.
Ohly inquired about arranging a meeting with Uni-Marts management to discuss the
Ordoukhanians' interest in making an offer for Uni-Marts. Mr. Ohly was asked to
provide some preliminary indication of the nature of his clients' financing and
management team for such a transaction. Mr. Ohly did not respond to this
request. In late August 2003, counsel for Uni-Marts called Mr. Ohly as a
courtesy to advise him that Uni-Marts was about to enter into a letter agreement
with another party which would contain a "standstill" provision prohibiting
Uni-Marts from negotiating with any other person for a designated period of
time. After the termination of the exclusivity arrangement with Reliance in
October 2003, counsel for Uni-Marts left a telephone message for Mr. Ohly on
October 24, 2003, and sent him a letter on October 28, 2003, notifying him that
the exclusive relationship between Uni-Marts and a potential purchaser had
expired, Uni-Marts was free to negotiate with other potential buyers and
therefore Uni-Marts' management would be pleased to meet with Mr. Ohly and his
clients to discuss their interest
18
in acquiring Uni-Marts. Since the date of those communications, neither
Uni-Marts nor its counsel has had any further response from Mr. Ohly or the
Ordoukhanians on this matter.
In light of the inability to positively advance the merger negotiations
with Reliance, the Ad Hoc Committee held a meeting on November 24, 2003 to
review certain new alternatives with management. Specifically, Henry Sahakian
and Messrs. Kervandjian and Petrick had approached Mr. Krumholz with the
possibility of an auction sale process to divest certain store locations.
Messrs. Kervandjian and Petrick indicated that they had met the previous week
with representatives of National Real Estate Clearing House (NRC), headquartered
in Chicago, Illinois, which specialized in the accelerated divestiture of
petroleum and convenience store properties through an auction process. They
indicated that NRC had recently represented companies such as Shell, BP, Clark,
Sunoco and Swifty Serve in conducting auction processes with regard to the
divestiture of convenience store properties. Mr. Kervandjian had also discussed
this alternative with Dennis Rubin, Executive Vice President and General Counsel
of GECFFC. The Ad Hoc Committee discussed in detail the financial parameters of
an auction sale process and asked Uni-Marts' management to prepare a written
business plan for the auction process by December 5, 2003, so that the Ad Hoc
Committee and Board of Directors could consider it during the week of December
8th. Mr. Ferry was instructed to notify Mr. Ehrenberg that the Ad Hoc Committee
needed time to consider an alternative proposal. Mr. Ferry sent such a letter to
Mr. Ehrenberg on November 25, 2003. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Vakharia contacted
Mr. Krumholz asking if the Ad Hoc Committee would oppose Mr. Vakharia's desire
to reach out to members of the Sahakian family to possibly form an alliance to
pursue the acquisition of Uni-Marts. Mr. Krumholz informed Mr. Vakharia that the
Ad Hoc Committee was open to entertaining any offer for Uni-Marts. On December
8, 2003, Mr. Vakharia met with Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian and Kervandjian
in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania to discuss this alliance. Mr. Sahakian contacted Mr.
Krumholz immediately after this meeting and informed him of the possibility of
an alliance being formed between himself and Mr. Vakharia. On December 14, 2003,
Mr. Sahakian and Mr. Vakharia came to an understanding whereby they would form
an alliance to create an entity that would make an offer for a transaction with
Uni-Marts at $2.25 per share. Subsequent to the formation of this alliance, the
Uni-Marts Board of Directors did not meet again until January 26, 2004, as
negotiations were conducted solely by the members of the Ad Hoc Committee, and
information regarding other potential transactions was not released to Messrs.
Henry and Daniel Sahakian by the Committee.
The Ad Hoc Committee next met on December 15, 2003 to review a financial
analysis prepared by Uni-Marts with regard to the proposed auction sale of the
business assets of 178 Uni-Marts' stores through NRC. The pro forma demonstrated
that the sales of business assets of the stores without the underlying real
estate would not yield sufficient proceeds to repay the indebtedness secured by
these stores, and Uni-Marts would therefore require a substantial additional
credit facility (at least $27.0 million) to pursue the auction alternative. The
Committee also discussed the risks of execution of the auction process and the
fact that GECFFC would have to agree to revised terms to its loan agreements
with Uni-Marts. In preparing the pro forma with regard to the auction sale of
stores through NRC, Uni-Marts did not obtain any valuations or appraisals of the
business assets comprising the 178 Uni-Marts stores. The estimated sales price
for the stores in the pro forma was based on a multiple of 1.5 times the
historical earnings of each store before deducting any interest, taxes,
depreciation or amortization. The 1.5 times earnings multiple was within the
range provided by NRC as a sales multiple which it had successfully obtained in
other convenience store auction scenarios. Mr. Krumholz also reported about the
request of Mr. Vakharia to possibly form an alliance with the Sahakians to
pursue the acquisition of Uni-Marts. At that time, the Ad Hoc Committee
controlled all negotiations involving the sale of Uni-Marts, and Henry and
Daniel Sahakian agreed, as they had during the discussions between HFL and
Uni-Marts, to excuse themselves from any Board discussion and abstain from any
vote by the Board of Directors regarding a possible transaction between
Uni-Marts and an entity they might form with Mr. Vakharia. Mr. Vakharia had
discussed this possible alliance with representatives of The Kushner Companies,
who had indicated to Mr. Vakharia that they would not seek to oppose his pursuit
of this opportunity. Mr. Krumholz then met in Dallas, Texas on December 17, 2003
with Evan Gladstone and Michael Bohnert, executives of NRC, to learn more about
the NRC auction sale process. He presented this information to the Ad Hoc
Committee at a meeting on December 19, 2003. Mr. Krumholz also advised the Ad
Hoc Committee that he and
19
Mr. Ferry had received a draft letter of intent on December 18, 2003 from the
Sahakian/Vakharia group proposing to acquire Uni-Marts at a per share price of
$2.25 in cash, and related that these parties had committed that their offer
would not contain some of the more onerous conditions required by Reliance's
potential investor, The Kushner Companies. The Ad Hoc Committee discussed
questions which they required to be answered by the Sahakian/Vakharia group
before further negotiations were conducted, including the likelihood that
consents to the assumption of indebtedness could be obtained from GECFFC and
Provident Bank, the timing of the proposed transaction, whether the acquiring
entity had the requisite funds to pay the cash merger consideration and
transactions costs, and the possibility of indemnification from the buyer for
any potential liability to The Kushner Companies. The Ad Hoc Committee directed
Messrs. Krumholz and Ferry to pose these and other questions to Messrs. Henry
Sahakian and Vakharia and report back to the Ad Hoc Committee.
On December 22, 2003, the Ad Hoc Committee met again following a telephone
conference among Messrs. Krumholz, Ferry, Henry Sahakian, Kervandjian, Vakharia
and Antzis on December 19, 2003. Mr. Ferry advised that Mr. Kervandjian had
communicated the intent of the Sahakian/Vakharia group to use the existing draft
definitive agreement previously negotiated with Reliance as a template for
negotiation of a definitive merger agreement, while deleting a number of the
conditions to closing required by Reliance), to raise the offered price from the
$1.87 per share offered by Reliance to $2.25 per share, and to form a limited
liability company (Green Valley) to pursue the transaction. Mr. Kervandjian also
indicated that he believed that GECFFC and Provident Bank would provide the
required consents to the merger because of the additional cash resources which
Mr. Vakharia and his colleagues were supplying to the buying entity. Mr.
Sahakian had indicated that members of the Sahakian family owning approximately
40% of the outstanding stock of Uni-Marts would sign voting agreements in favor
of the transaction. Mr. Vakharia had indicated that he did not believe
termination of his affiliation with The Kushner Companies would give rise to any
litigation against either Mr. Vakharia, Uni-Marts or Green Valley as the new
buying entity, both because of the discretionary nature of his relationship with
The Kushner Companies and the fact that The Kushner Companies had previously
supplied only a modest amount of money to Reliance's efforts, which Mr. Vakharia
planned to reimburse. The Ad Hoc Committee still had certain outstanding
questions about the transaction, such as desiring that members of the Ad Hoc
Committee speak with representatives of GECFFC and Provident Bank to determine
their support of the transaction, and requesting confirmation from the new
buying group of its financing sources to supply the cash necessary to complete
the transaction. Subject to these issues, the Ad Hoc Committee supported
continuing negotiations with the Sahakian/Vakharia Group.
On December 30, 2003, Mr. Ferry sent to Robert Young, who was now
representing Green Valley, an outstanding list of issues concerning the
transaction and the merger agreement. Those issues were, (1) the requirement of
a mandatory tender offer if the holders of Uni-Marts' shares representing 15% or
more of the outstanding shares exercised dissenters' rights, (2) whether Green
Valley should have a due diligence out, (3) the appropriateness of various
conditions to closing including the obtaining of environmental insurance,
limitations on debt and a requirement that Uni-Marts meet certain cash, net
operating asset and EBITDA thresholds, (4) the payment of a termination fee if
Green Valley elected not to close because of a material adverse change in
Uni-Marts, (5) a limit on the damages for which Green Valley could be liable if
it defaulted, and (6) the size of a proposed termination fee. On January 7,
2004, Mr. Ferry and Uni-Marts counsel met with Mr. Young in Radnor, Pennsylvania
to negotiate the new merger agreement between Uni-Marts and Green Valley. One of
the issues discussed was Uni-Marts' requirement of a $400,000 cash deposit from
buyer which could be applied toward any future claim for breach of the agreement
by buyer (or else applied toward the merger consideration). Mr. Young
distributed a new draft of the merger agreement on January 8, 2004, and on
January 12, 2004, Messrs. Ferry and Young and Uni-Marts counsel continued their
negotiation by conference call. Several days later, another draft of the merger
agreement was circulated and counsel continued to consult with their clients and
negotiate open issues as to whether a deposit by Green Valley would be required,
the appropriate amount of the termination fee, and the limitation on Green
Valley's liability if it defaulted.
20
On January 16, 2004, the Ad Hoc Committee held a meeting to review the
current status of the merger negotiations with Green Valley. Chad Hull, Director
of Investment Banking at Boenning & Scattergood, joined the Committee by
conference telephone to present his firm's initial analysis and preliminary
conclusions as to the fairness of the proposed cash merger consideration to
Uni-Marts' stockholders from a financial point of view. Such oral presentation
was substantially identical to the presentation by Boenning & Scattergood to the
Uni-Marts' Board on January 26, 2004, as discussed below. Mr. Hull indicated
that, subject to completion of its analysis and due diligence, Boenning &
Scattergood would be prepared to issue a fairness opinion to the Ad Hoc
Committee as to whether the merger price of $2.25 per share was fair from a
financial point of view to the stockholders of Uni-Marts. Members of the
Committee asked Mr. Krumholz to obtain (1) a letter from representatives of the
Sahakian/Vakharia group that no significant transaction involving Uni-Marts'
assets was imminent, (2) comfort letters from representatives of the Sahakian
and Vakharia groups as to their access to funds necessary to consummate the
merger, and (3) a letter from representatives of the Vakharia group indemnifying
Uni-Marts and its directors and officers for any claims or potential litigation
from Reliance Management or The Kushner Companies for failure to proceed with
the proposed transaction with Reliance. The Ad Hoc Committee unanimously
recommended approval of the merger transaction with the Sahakian/Vakharia group
conditioned upon receipt of the various comfort letters identified in the
meeting, and its receipt of, and presentation to, the full Board of the fairness
opinion from Boenning & Scattergood.
By January 23, 2004, the merger agreement had been revised and delivered to
Messrs. Krumholz and Ferry and Uni-Marts counsel in virtually final form.
Messrs. Krumholz and Ferry and representatives of Uni-Marts management and
Uni-Marts counsel had conference calls on January 12 and January 15, 2004, with
representatives of GECFFC and Provident Bank, respectively, to discuss the
lenders' willingness to consent to the merger. In a telephone call on January
22, 2004, Mr. Krumholz received assurances from Charles Kushner that The Kushner
Companies did not object to Mr. Vakharia pursuing an offer for Uni-Marts with
the Tri-Color Members. On January 23, 2004 the negotiated version of the merger
agreement and the fairness opinion of Boenning & Scattergood were distributed to
all Board of Directors members, and the Board of Directors scheduled a meeting
for January 26, 2004, to vote upon the proposed merger transaction.
The Board of Directors was presented at its meeting on January 26, 2004 not
only with the final version of the merger agreement, form of voting agreement
with the Sahakian family members, and amendment to Uni-Marts' Rights Agreement,
but also (a) a letter agreement with Mr. Levinsohn, indemnifying Uni-Marts and
the members of the Board of Directors against any claims which might be asserted
by The Kushner Companies in connection with the merger transaction, (b) letters
from the accountants for Mr. Levinsohn and the Affiliated Stockholders advising
that each such party had access to the funds necessary to pay their
proportionate shares of the aggregate merger consideration, (c) a letter signed
by Mr. Kervandjian and Mr. Levinsohn stating that there was no transaction
involving the sale of a significant portion of Uni-Marts' assets imminent at
that time, and (d) modifications to Uni-Marts' existing change in control
agreements providing that Uni-Marts need not establish a trust fund upon the
execution of the merger agreements to satisfy its severance obligations. At the
beginning of the Board meeting, Mr. Krumholz summarized the due diligence
regarding Green Valley's financing and other matters which he and Mr. Ferry had
performed over the past week, and reiterated the Ad Hoc Committee's January 16,
2004 recommendation of the merger with Green Valley.
At the special meeting of Uni-Marts' Board of Directors held on January 26,
2004, Messrs. Ferry and Antzis also reviewed the finalized terms of the proposed
merger agreement. The requirement to amend Uni-Marts' Rights Agreement to allow
the transaction with the entity formed by the Sahakian/Vakharia Group, named
Green Valley Acquisition Co., LLC, was also discussed with the Board of
Directors. In addition, representatives of Boenning & Scattergood made a
presentation regarding their analysis of the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the merger consideration. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Opinion of Boenning &
Scattergood." Boenning & Scattergood rendered its written opinion that, as of
such date, the consideration to be received by the holders of Uni-Marts' shares
of common stock pursuant to the merger agreement with Green Valley was fair from
a financial point of view to such stockholders.
21
After such presentations, Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian left the meeting so
that the remaining disinterested members of the Board of Directors could discuss
the proposed merger with their attorneys and financial advisors. Following a
lengthy discussion, Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian were asked to return to
the meeting and Uni-Marts' Board of Directors voted unanimously (with Messrs.
Henry and Daniel Sahakian abstaining): (i) to approve the proposed merger with
Green Valley, the merger agreement and related exhibits as presented to them,
(ii) to amend Uni-Marts' Rights Agreement to allow the acquisition by Green
Valley, and (iii) to recommend that Uni-Marts' stockholders vote to approve the
merger with Green Valley.
Following the approval of Uni-Marts' Board of Directors, the merger
agreement in its definitive form was executed during the evening of January 26,
2004 and publicly announced the following morning.
PURPOSES OF THE MERGER
Uni-Marts' purpose for the merger is to provide the Public Stockholders
with liquidity for their shares at a price above the market trading price for
the shares. The shares are not actively traded and Uni-Marts lacks the capital
resources for significant growth. For the past several years, Uni-Marts'
management sought to sell assets to improve Uni-Marts' financial position, but
its divestiture plan was never fully realized. As a result, Uni-Marts lacks the
funds to effect certain types of transactions, such as a reverse stock split or
a tender offer, whereby its stockholders would be given a choice to receive cash
payment for their shares or remain as stockholders of Uni-Marts. Thus, these
alternative means of going private were never seriously considered by the Ad Hoc
Committee or the Board of Directors. Instead, the Board ultimately opted not to
remain public and pursued a sale of the company, either to a third party or a
management-led group, to effect the purpose of providing liquidity for the
Public Stockholders. The merger with Green Valley creates a liquidity event
which Uni-Marts, in light of its current business operations and capital
constraints, has been unable to accomplish independently in any significant
manner.
REASONS FOR THE AD HOC COMMITTEE'S DETERMINATION
In concluding that the merger is fair to Uni-Marts' stockholders and
recommending adoption of the merger agreement to Uni-Marts' Board of Directors,
the material factors considered by the Ad Hoc Committee were as follows:
- The Committee is composed solely of independent directors who are not
officers or employees of Uni-Marts and will not be owners or employees of
Green Valley following the merger. The Committee members have no
financial interest in the merger that is different from the interests of
Uni-Marts' stockholders, other than the receipt of fees for services as
members of Uni-Marts' Board of Directors and committees of the Board of
Directors;
- The Committee was given authority, among other things, to evaluate,
negotiate and recommend the terms of any proposed transaction, and to
refuse to recommend a transaction that it did not believe to be fair;
- The Committee engaged its own separate independent legal counsel and
investment banking firm in evaluating, negotiating and recommending the
terms of the merger agreement. The Committee's firm, Boenning &
Scattergood, had no previous affiliation or involvement with Uni-Marts,
its management or the owners of Green Valley and were under the exclusive
direction of the Committee;
- The Committee, together with legal advisors, conducted multiple active
negotiating sessions and discussions with representatives of Green Valley
and other interested parties;
- The Committee members' familiarity with Uni-Marts' business, financial
results and prospects and their knowledge of Uni-Marts' industry, which
they have developed through their years of service as members of
Uni-Marts' Board of Directors, and their general business knowledge and
experience;
22
- Boenning & Scattergood's presentation at the Board of Directors meeting
on January 26, 2004 regarding the fairness of the price, and its opinion,
subject to the considerations and limitations set forth in the opinion,
that the price is fair, from a financial point of view, to the
stockholders. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Opinion of Boenning & Scattergood"
and the copy of Boenning & Scattergood's opinion attached as Annex C to
this proxy statement;
- The relationship between the $2.25 price per share to be paid in the
merger and the recent market prices of Uni-Marts' common stock. As
reported by Boenning & Scattergood, the $2.25 per share to be paid in the
merger represented (i) a 27.8% premium over the closing sale price per
share for the one trading day prior to January 22, 2004 (the date of
preparation of Boenning & Scattergood's fairness analysis), (ii) a 38.9%
premium over the closing price for the five trading days before January
22, 2004, and (iii) a 33.1% premium over the closing sale price per share
for the 30 trading days before January 22, 2004. These premiums compared
to the median premiums in 168 similar-sized transactions analyzed by
Boenning & Scattergood of 34.2%, 39.1% and 49.6%, respectively. While the
$2.25 per share offer from Green Valley in January 2004 represented a
much smaller premium to the market price of Uni-Marts' shares immediately
prior to the announcement of the transaction, as compared to the premium
over market represented by the $2.25 per share offered in the United
Refining and HFL letters of intent in May 2003, the Committee took into
account (i) the substantial increase in the market price of Uni-Marts'
shares following announcement of the execution of the HFL letter of
intent (from $1.70 per share on May 30, 2003 to $2.19 per share on June
3, 2003, the date of the announcement), and (ii) the fact that the market
price of Uni-Marts' shares remained at much higher levels from June 2003
to January 2004 than the price per Uni-Marts' share in early 2003. The
premium to the market price of Uni-Marts' shares at the time of
announcement of the Green Valley offer was significantly less than the
premiums to market price at the time of the United Refining and HFL
offers in May 2003, due to the increase in the price of Uni-Marts' shares
caused by those earlier offers and continuing higher price level
thereafter. The last day on which Uni-Marts' share price closed at a
price equal to or in excess of $2.25 per share was July 22, 2002;
- The relation of the price to be paid in the merger and the implied
valuation multiples of this price to (i) multiples implied by Boenning &
Scattergood's comparable company analysis (the implied multiples based on
the offer were higher than the median values in the case of four of the
multiples examined, lower in the case of two and within or above the
range in the case of all six of the multiples), (ii) implied equity
values per share and enterprise values for Uni-Marts resulting from
Boenning & Scattergood's discounted cash flow analysis and implied values
resulting from Boenning & Scattergood's sensitivity analysis conducted as
part of its discounted cash flow analysis which were below the offer
price in the No Divestiture Scenario (defined below) and above the offer
price in the Divestiture Scenario (defined below), (iii) implied
multiples resulting from Boenning & Scattergood's industry transactions
analysis (the implied multiples based on the offer were higher than the
median values in the case of four of the multiples examined, lower in the
case of two and within or above the range in the case of five of the six
multiples), (iv) implied internal rates of return resulting from Boenning
& Scattergood's financial sponsor analysis which were below, in all
scenarios, generally required rates of return, (v) premiums paid to
prevailing share price in recent transactions based on Boenning &
Scattergood's premiums paid analysis which were lower than the median
comparable values in all scenarios but within the range of comparable
values in all scenarios, and (vi) indicated equity values per share
resulting from Boenning & Scattergood's liquidation analysis which were
less than $0.00 per share. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Opinion of Boenning &
Scattergood";
- The geographic areas in which Uni-Marts operates are highly competitive
and each store's ability to compete depends on its location,
accessibility, product offerings and customer service. Uni-Marts competes
with other convenience store chains, gasoline stations, supermarkets,
drug stores, discount stores and mass merchants. In recent years, several
non-traditional retailers, such as supermarkets and mass merchants, have
impacted the convenience store industry by entering the gasoline retail
23
business. In addition, the convenience store industry experienced a
double-digit percentage drop in cigarette sales in 2002, attributed
largely to the loss of sales to mail order and Internet cigarette
merchants. While the convenience store industry held its own in 2003 with
respect to cigarette sales (which increased 1.8% overall), in the
convenience store sector, sales declined on a per store basis by 0.6%. In
many instances, our competitors have greater financial, marketing and
other resources than Uni-Marts does. As a result, our competitors may be
able to respond better to changes in the economy and new opportunities
within the industry. The Committee considered it unlikely that Uni-Marts
would grow through new store locations or market share gains vis-a-vis
its major competitors. The Committee also noted that Sheetz and WaWa have
entered into many of Uni-Marts' markets. The decision to sell Uni-Marts
and, ultimately, to go private at this time was largely based on these
competitive pressures and Uni-Marts' liquidity concerns;
- The limited benefit to Uni-Marts' stockholders resulting from being
publicly held. The common stock has experienced very thin trading volume
(approximately 2,300 shares per day over the prior four years). On many
days Uni-Marts' shares do not trade and relatively small trades can have
a significant impact on the trading price. There is no significant
institutional sponsorship of Uni-Marts' shares and no coverage by
institutional research analysts. As a result, stockholders do not enjoy
meaningful liquidity in their holdings and are unable to sell significant
numbers of shares without a negative effect on the trading price, and
Uni-Marts' shares are not viable currency for acquisitions. Uni-Marts
also is not in a position to raise additional financing through the
public capital markets;
- The expenses to Uni-Marts of the reporting and compliance requirements of
a public company (approximately $850,000 annually), including the
increased costs to Uni-Marts for reporting and compliance issues
following adoption of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules
and regulations (approximately $150,000);
- The Committee's belief that in the absence of a transaction, the
stockholders' ability to realize value in excess of $2.25 per share would
be doubtful and would be accompanied by significant risks. The
Committee's belief was based on the strength and resources of Uni-Marts'
competitors, the instability of petroleum wholesale prices, increased
competition among retailers for market share during the slow economic
recovery period experienced in 2002 and 2003, trends in the convenience
store industry (described above) and Uni-Marts' relative size and lack of
capital resources;
- The Committee's belief that it was unlikely that any other buyer would be
willing to pay a price for Uni-Marts greater than $2.25 per share in
cash. This belief was based on the long history of our attempt to sell
Uni-Marts to a third party. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Background of the
Merger."
- The fact that the merger consideration will be paid entirely in cash,
which eliminates any issues related to valuing the merger consideration;
- The fact that Uni-Marts may consider unsolicited alternative acquisition
proposals that are superior to the Green Valley offer, to the extent
required in connection with the directors' discharge of their fiduciary
duty. See "THE MERGER AGREEMENT -- Covenants."
The material risks and other potential detriments concerning the merger
considered by the Ad Hoc Committee were as follows:
- Following the merger, stockholders (other than the Tri-Color Members and
KOTA Management because of their direct or indirect ownership of Green
Valley) will cease to participate in any future earnings growth of
Uni-Marts or benefit from any increase in the value of Uni-Marts (just as
they will cease to bear the risk of any decrease in the value of
Uni-Marts);
- Under the terms of the merger agreement, Uni-Marts is unable to solicit
or encourage other acquisition proposals;
24
- If the merger agreement is terminated because Uni-Marts receives a
"superior proposal," as discussed in more detail under "THE MERGER
AGREEMENT," Green Valley shall be entitled to receive a termination or
"break-up" fee of $800,000 from Uni-Marts. The obligation to pay this fee
may deter another party from making a superior proposal;
- A stockholder generally will be required to include in his or her taxable
income the amount, if any, by which $2.25 exceeds the stockholder's basis
in his or her shares of Uni-Marts' common stock. If the shares are a
capital asset in the hands of the stockholder, resulting gain may be
long-term or short-term capital gain, depending on the stockholder's
holding period for the shares. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Material United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences";
- Through voting agreements, Green Valley controls the vote of
approximately 45.8% of the outstanding common stock of Uni-Marts (47.9%
including options exercisable by June 29, 2004). This substantial voting
percentage significantly increases the likelihood that the merger will be
approved, even if a group of Public Shareholders vote against the merger;
- Certain equity owners of Green Valley, who include Uni-Marts' President
and Chief Executive Officer, have conflicts of interest because of their
continued employment and equity ownership in Green Valley following the
merger (including their right to certain preferential distributions from
Green Valley; see "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Other Agreements Between Green
Valley, the Tri-Color Members and Uni-Marts");
- Disruption to the operations of Uni-Marts and the morale of its employees
might result following announcement of the merger, due to employee
concerns regarding continued employment as a result of store closings.
If, for any reason, the merger is not completed, Uni-Marts could
encounter (i) liquidity problems if it is unable to divest store
locations in a timely manner and on acceptable terms, and (ii) adverse
changes to its current bank or vendor relations. See "MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS -- Liquidity and Capital Resources."
The Committee concluded that the positive factors described above
supporting the fairness of the merger to the Uni-Marts' stockholders outweighed
the negative factors. Because of the number and variety of factors considered,
the Committee members did not find it practicable to quantify or otherwise
assign specific relative weights to each of the factors and analyses considered
by them in reaching their conclusion. The Committee's determination was made
after considering all these factors together. In reaching its determination to
recommend adoption of the merger agreement to the Uni-Marts Board of Directors,
the Committee relied upon and adopted the financial and comparative analyses
prepared by Boenning & Scattergood and the fairness opinion issued by Boenning &
Scattergood.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS
On January 16, 2004, the Ad Hoc Committee unanimously determined that the
merger and the merger agreement are advisable, fair to and in the best interests
of Uni-Marts' stockholders, generally, and the Public Stockholders, in
particular, and recommended (subject to receipt of a fairness opinion and the
receipt of various comfort letters identified in the meeting) that the Board of
Directors and Uni-Marts' stockholders adopt and approve the merger agreement and
the merger. On January 26, 2004, the Board of Directors relied on the unanimous
recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee, and, after a thorough discussion, which
included a review of the merger agreement with its legal advisors and a
presentation of the fairness opinion by Boenning & Scattergood, adopted the Ad
Hoc Committee's analysis and conclusions and determined that the merger and the
merger agreement are procedurally and substantively fair to and in the best
interests of Uni-Marts' stockholders, generally, and the Public Stockholders, in
particular, and recommended that Uni-Marts' stockholders adopt the merger
agreement and approve the merger. Henry Sahakian and Daniel Sahakian attended
the Board of Directors meeting for quorum purposes, but abstained from voting
with respect to the merger and the merger agreement. At this meeting, the Board
of Directors did not consider any other alternatives to the merger.
25
A separate vote of a majority of the Public Stockholders was not imposed by
the Board as a condition of approving the merger because the Board, in adopting
the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee, determined that the Ad Hoc
Committee had fairly and fully negotiated the merger in a disinterested and
informed manner, with advice and assistance of independent legal counsel and
investment bankers. The Board was aware of the process followed by the Ad Hoc
Committee and concluded that the process was procedurally fair to all Uni-Marts'
stockholders, including the Public Stockholders. Factors considered in
determining that the Ad Hoc Committee had functioned in a proper and
procedurally fair manner for the benefit of all stockholders included the
following:
- Committee members were independent from Green Valley and the controlling
shareholders of Uni-Marts.
- The Committee was given full authority to negotiate on an arm's-length
basis with representatives of Green Valley and to recommend for or
against the merger.
- The Committee was formed in February 2002 and empowered to conduct all
negotiations as soon as it became apparent that management and
controlling shareholders of Uni-Marts would be involved on both sides of
the merger.
- The Committee presented a process and record of informed, deliberate and
careful negotiations.
- The Committee demonstrated that it had the power to and did actively
negotiate with the buyer regarding the material terms of the merger.
- The Committee had authority to and did hire its own independent and
conflict-free legal and investment banker.
In view of the foregoing, the Ad Hoc Committee and Board of Directors
believe that sufficient procedural safeguards exist to ensure the fairness of
the merger and to permit the Ad Hoc Committee to effectively represent the
interests of the Public Stockholders, and therefore, additional unaffiliated
representatives to act on behalf of the Public Stockholders are not necessary.
POSITION OF THE GREEN VALLEY GROUP REGARDING THE FAIRNESS AND PURPOSE OF THE
MERGER
SEC rules require the members of the Green Valley Group to express their
beliefs as to the substantive and procedural fairness of the merger to the
Public Stockholders. Each of the members of the Green Valley Group (GreenValley,
Henry Sahakian, Daniel Sahakian, Ara Kervandjian, Tri-Color, HFL, Raj Vakharia,
Paul Levinsohn, KOTA Holdings and KOTA Management) believe that the merger is
substantively and procedurally fair to the Public Stockholders even though a
majority vote of the Public Stockholders is not required to approve the merger,
for the same reasons that the Ad Hoc Committee and the Board of Directors of
Uni-Marts concluded that the merger was procedurally fair to the Public
Stockholders. In reaching this conclusion, each of the members of the Green
Valley Group adopted the analysis of the Board of Directors of Uni-Marts. See
"SPECIAL FACTORS -- Recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee and Board of
Directors."
The purpose of the members of the Green Valley Group for the merger is to
allow certain members of Uni-Marts' management, working in a new alliance with
the beneficial owners of KOTA Holdings, to create an enhanced platform for
future business opportunities. By acquiring all of the Uni-Marts' stock and
leveraging the industry contacts of Mr. Vakharia, the members of the Green
Valley Group believe that Green Valley will be better situated to negotiate with
existing lenders and seek new financing sources, as well as to divest assets and
pursue new growth opportunities. The Green Valley Group considered one
alternative means of conducting the transaction, namely a tender offer for the
Uni-Marts shares. While the merger agreement requires Green Valley to pursue a
tender offer if holders of 15% or more of the Uni-Marts shares elect dissenters'
rights and Green Valley terminates the merger agreement, the Green Valley Group
prefers to conduct the transaction as a merger and cause all Public Stockholders
to receive cash for their shares. This allows the Green Valley Group to receive
all of the benefits of its implementation plan commensurate with its efforts,
but also to bear all of the risks of execution without
26
liability to unaffiliated stockholders. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Plans After the
Merger" for a description of the post-merger plans of the Green Valley Group.
The proposed merger was not motivated by any ability on Green Valley's part to
avoid or delay the payment of taxes. As described later, Uni-Marts' tax loss
carryovers will not be available to offset profits of Green Valley, if any,
after the merger. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Material United States Federal Income
Tax Consequences."
OPINION OF BOENNING & SCATTERGOOD
On May 23, 2003, the Ad Hoc Committee retained Boenning & Scattergood in
connection with the proposed transactions for the sale of Uni-Marts and to
deliver an opinion to the Ad Hoc Committee as to the fairness, from a financial
point of view, to Uni-Marts' stockholders of the consideration to be received in
connection with such a transaction.
The engagement letter between Boenning & Scattergood and the Ad Hoc
Committee provides that, for its services, Boenning & Scattergood is entitled to
receive a fee of $125,000, of which $25,000 was payable upon its engagement and
$100,000 was payable upon delivery of Boenning & Scattergood's written opinion.
Boenning & Scattergood will be reimbursed for certain of its out-of-pocket
expenses, including legal fees, and be indemnified for certain losses, claims,
damages and liabilities relating to or arising out of services provided by
Boenning & Scattergood. Neither Uni-Marts nor any affiliate imposed any
limitation on the scope of the fairness opinion or provided any instructions to
Boenning & Scattergood with respect to the fairness opinion.
The following paragraphs summarize the financial and comparative analyses
performed by Boenning & Scattergood in connection with its opinion. The
following paragraphs also describe the financial and comparative analyses used
in preparation of the materials distributed to the Board of Directors on January
23, 2004. Boenning & Scattergood has consented to being named in this proxy
statement. The summary does not represent a complete description of the analyses
performed by Boenning & Scattergood; however, it does capture the results of all
of the material analyses performed by Boenning & Scattergood.
Boenning & Scattergood was retained by the Ad Hoc Committee on the basis of
its experience, expertise and familiarity with a wide variety of comparable
businesses and transactions. As part of its investment banking business,
Boenning & Scattergood regularly is engaged in the valuation of assets,
securities and companies in connection with various types of asset and
securities transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, going-private
transactions, private placements and valuations for various other purposes, and
in the determination of the adequacy of consideration in such transactions. In
the ordinary course of its business as a broker-dealer, Boenning & Scattergood
may, from time to time, purchase securities from, and sell securities to,
Uni-Marts. In the ordinary course of business, Boenning & Scattergood may
actively trade the securities of Uni-Marts for its own account and for the
accounts of customers and accordingly may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities.
On January 26, 2004, Boenning & Scattergood met in person with the Board of
Directors and discussed its analysis, and delivered to the Ad Hoc Committee its
written opinion dated January 26, 2004, to the effect that, as of that date, and
based upon and subject to the assumptions, considerations and limitations set
forth in its opinion, the financial consideration to be received in the merger
was fair, from a financial point of view, to Uni-Marts' stockholders.
BOENNING & SCATTERGOOD'S OPINION IS DIRECTED TO THE AD HOC COMMITTEE AND
ADDRESSES ONLY THE FAIRNESS, FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW, TO THE STOCKHOLDERS
OF THE MERGER CONSIDERATION AND DOES NOT ADDRESS UNI-MARTS' UNDERLYING BUSINESS
DECISION TO ENTER INTO THE MERGER OR ANY OTHER TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
THE OPINION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE OF THE AD HOC
COMMITTEE IN CONNECTION WITH ITS CONSIDERATION OF THE TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED
BY THE MERGER AGREEMENT. THE OPINION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY
UNI-MARTS STOCKHOLDER AS TO HOW SUCH STOCKHOLDER SHOULD VOTE AT ANY MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS HELD IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER. BOENNING & SCATTERGOOD IS
AWARE, HOWEVER, THAT ITS OPINION IS BEING ATTACHED TO THIS PROXY STATEMENT, AND
THAT SUCH OPINION MAY BE CONSIDERED BY UNI-MARTS' STOCKHOLDERS WHEN MAKING THEIR
DECISIONS AS TO WHETHER TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE MERGER.
27
It should be noted that Boenning & Scattergood's opinion is based on
economic and market conditions and other circumstances existing on, and
information made available as of, the date thereof and does not address any
matters subsequent to such date. In addition, the opinion is, in any event,
limited to the fairness, as of such date, from a financial point of view, of the
merger consideration to be received by the stockholders pursuant to the merger
agreement and does not address Uni-Marts' underlying business decision to effect
the merger or any other terms of the merger agreement. Boenning & Scattergood
was not engaged to solicit indications of interest or to otherwise explore the
viability of any alternative transaction to the merger. It should be noted that
although subsequent developments may affect Boenning & Scattergood's opinion, it
does not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm it. Boenning &
Scattergood did not determine or recommend the amount of consideration to be
paid pursuant to the merger agreement.
The full text of Boenning & Scattergood's written opinion which sets forth,
among other things, the assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the
review undertaken by Boenning & Scattergood in connection with the opinion, is
attached as Annex C to this proxy statement and is incorporated herein by
reference. Stockholders are urged to read the opinion in its entirety.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Boenning & Scattergood, among
other things: (i) reviewed the historical financial performance, current
financial position and general prospects of Uni-Marts, and reviewed certain
internal financial analyses and forecasts prepared by the management of
Uni-Marts; (ii) reviewed a draft of the merger agreement; (iii) studied and
analyzed the stock market trading history of Uni-Marts; (iv) considered the
terms and conditions of the transaction as compared with the terms and
conditions of certain acquisition transactions involving operators of
convenience stores and blocks of stores; (v) met and/or communicated with
certain members of Uni-Marts' senior management to discuss its operations,
historical financial statements, future prospects and business strategy,
including its plan to divest of 128 underperforming stores and stores located in
non-core geographic areas, as well as certain alternative store counts; and (vi)
conducted such other financial analyses, studies and investigations as it deemed
appropriate. All material analyses, studies and investigations that were
performed are described in this proxy statement.
In its review and analyses and in arriving at its opinion, Boenning &
Scattergood assumed and relied upon, without assuming any responsibility for
independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all financial and
other information and data publicly available or furnished to, discussed with or
otherwise reviewed by or for it. Boenning & Scattergood further relied upon the
assurances of management of Uni-Marts that they are not aware of any facts that
would make any of such information inaccurate or misleading. Boenning &
Scattergood did not make and was not provided with an independent evaluation or
appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Uni-Marts.
In addition, Boenning & Scattergood has not assumed any obligation to conduct,
nor did it conduct, any physical inspection of the properties or facilities of
Uni-Marts. With respect to financial projections, Boenning & Scattergood was
advised by the management of Uni-Marts and assumed that such projections and
other information were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgment of the management as to the future
financial performance of Uni-Marts. Boenning & Scattergood expressed no view
with respect to such projections and other information or the assumptions on
which they are based.
In evaluating the merger consideration, Boenning & Scattergood performed a
variety of financial and comparative analyses, including those described below.
The summary of these analyses is not a complete description of the analyses
performed by Boenning & Scattergood. The preparation of a fairness opinion and
the related analyses are complex analytical processes involving various
determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial
analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances
and, therefore, such an opinion and the related analyses are not readily
susceptible to summary description. Accordingly, Boenning & Scattergood believes
that selected portions of its analyses and certain factors, without considering
all analyses and all factors, could create a misleading or incomplete view of
the processes underlying its analyses and opinion. In addition, some of the
summaries of the financial analyses include information presented in tabular
format. The tables are not intended to
28
stand alone, and in order to more fully understand the financial analyses of
Boenning & Scattergood, the tables must be read together with the full text of
each summary.
In its analyses, Boenning & Scattergood considered industry, market,
general business and economic, financial and other conditions and other matters
existing as of the date of its analyses and opinion, many of which are beyond
the control of Boenning & Scattergood and Uni-Marts. No company, transaction or
business considered in those analyses as a comparison is identical to Uni-Marts
or the proposed merger, and an evaluation of those analyses is not entirely
mathematical. Rather, the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments
concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could
affect the acquisition, public trading or other values of the companies,
business segments or transactions analyzed. There were no specific factors, when
viewed in the context of all of the analyses, that did not support Boenning &
Scattergood's fairness opinion, other than (i) the multiple of book value
implied by the offer which was below the range and the median of the Industry
Transactions reviewed by Boenning & Scattergood and (ii) the discounted cash
flow analysis performed by Boenning & Scattergood in the divestiture scenario
which produced an implied share price which was higher than the offer of $2.25
per share.
Boenning & Scattergood's opinion was among many factors considered by the
Ad Hoc Committee and Board of Directors in its evaluation of the merger and
should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the Ad Hoc Committee and
Board of Directors with respect to the merger consideration or the merger. In
the event that the merger agreement is proposed to be amended in any material
manner that would materially diminish the rights of Uni-Marts, or the benefits
to the Public Stockholders, the Ad Hoc Committee will consider whether a revised
fairness opinion is warranted.
Boenning & Scattergood Analysis
On January 26, 2004, Boenning & Scattergood delivered its written opinion
to the Ad Hoc Committee of the Board of Directors, that, as of such date and
based upon the assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the
review set forth therein, the consideration to be received by holders of
Uni-Marts' shares pursuant to the merger is fair from a financial point of view
to such stockholders. The opinion was issued following a presentation to the
Board of Directors on January 26, 2004, which contained analyses dated January
22, 2004.
THE DESCRIPTION BELOW SETS FORTH THE METHODOLOGY FOLLOWED BY BOENNING &
SCATTERGOOD, WHICH PROVIDED THE BASIS FOR ITS OPINION. HOLDERS OF SHARES ARE
URGED TO, AND SHOULD, READ CAREFULLY SUCH OPINION (ATTACHED AS ANNEX C) IN ITS
ENTIRETY.
The following is a summary of the material analyses utilized by Boenning &
Scattergood in connection with the opinion.
Summary of Transaction
Boenning & Scattergood calculated the implied pricing and valuation
multiples based on the offer of $2.25 per share, balance sheet and operating
data as of January 1, 2004 and shares and options outstanding as of January 1,
2004. (Note: In the third quarter of 2003, Uni-Marts classified certain assets
as discontinued operations. For comparative purposes, Boenning & Scattergood in
its analyses adjusted affected historical income statement figures to remove the
impact of this reclassification, based on information provided by Uni-Marts'
management. Additionally, Boenning & Scattergood excluded the
29
impact of items related to changes in accounting principles in examining
Uni-Marts.) Based on this data, the key valuation statistics were as follows:
Offer Price Per Share....................................... $ 2.25
Total Equity Value(a) ($Millions)........................... $18,406
Net Debt ($Millions)........................................ $71,379
Enterprise Value(b) ($Millions)............................. $89,784
Equity Value/Net Income..................................... NM(c)
Equity Value/Book Value..................................... 0.9x
Enterprise Value/Last Twelve Months ("LTM") Revenue......... 0.2x
Enterprise Value/LTM Earnings before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization ("EBITDA").................. 7.9x
Enterprise Value/LTM Earnings before Interest and Taxes
("EBIT").................................................. 16.9x
Offer/Market Price Per Common Share 1 Day Before
Announcement.............................................. 27.8%
---------------
(a) The equity value is calculated by taking the summation of common shares
outstanding (7,202,979 as of Jan. 1, 2004) and "in-the-money" options
(options with a strike price less than $2.25 per share; 977,333 of these
existed as of Jan. 1 2004) and multiplying this value by $2.25.
(b) Enterprise value equals total market value of equity plus net debt (debt and
preferred stock, less cash and marketable securities).
(c) For the period shown, Uni-Marts had negative earnings resulting in a "NM" or
not meaningful value.
Comparable Company Analysis
Boenning & Scattergood compared certain financial and operating ratios for
Uni-Marts with the corresponding financial and operating ratios for a group of
companies comparable to Uni-Marts (collectively, the "Comparable Companies").
The Comparable Companies are those publicly traded companies identified by
Boenning & Scattergood which are based in North America and derive a significant
portion of their business from the operation of convenience stores. Boenning &
Scattergood identified the following as Comparable Companies:
- 7-Eleven, Inc.;
- Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.;
- Bowlin Travel Centers, Inc.;
- Casey's General Stores, Inc.;
- The Kroger Co.; and
- The Pantry, Inc.
For each of the Comparable Companies, Boenning & Scattergood calculated
gross margins, EBITDA margins, net margins and debt to total capital ratios
based on the Comparable Companies' LTM operating figures and most recent balance
sheets. The analysis resulted in the following:
RANGE OF MEDIAN OF
COMPARABLE COMPANIES COMPARABLE COMPANIES UNI-MARTS
-------------------- -------------------- ---------
LTM Gross Margin.................... 18.3% - 36.8% 24.3% 18.5%
LTM EBITDA Margin................... 3.7% - 6.9% 5.2% 2.4%
LTM Net Margin...................... 0.6% - 2.3% 2.0% NM(a)
Debt to Total Capital............... 25.8% - 83.8% 49.7% 79.0%
---------------
(a) For the period shown, Uni-Marts had negative earnings resulting in a
"NM" or not meaningful value.
On an LTM basis, Uni-Marts' gross margin of 18.5% was within the range of
the Comparable Companies of 18.3% to 36.8%. Its EBITDA margin of 2.4% and its
not meaningful net margin were both
30
less than the range of the Comparable Companies of 3.7% to 6.9% for EBITDA
margins and 0.6% to 2.3% for net margins. For all three of these margins (gross,
EBITDA, and net), Uni-Marts' LTM value was less than the median value of the
Comparable Companies, which were 24.3%, 5.2% and 2.0%, respectively, which
indicates that Uni-Marts was less profitable than the median of the Comparable
Companies for each dollar of revenue earned. Uni-Marts' debt to total capital
ratio of 79.0% was within the range of the Comparable Companies of 25.8% to
83.8% but was greater than the median value of 49.7%, indicating that it had
greater leverage than the median of the Comparable Companies.
For each of the Comparable Companies, Boenning & Scattergood calculated
price-to-book value multiples based on the Comparable Companies' most recent
balance sheet data and price-to-earnings multiples based on the Comparable
Companies' LTM earnings and estimated earnings for the calendar year ended
December 31, 2004. This analysis resulted in the following multiples:
RANGE OF MULTIPLES MEDIAN OFFER
------------------ ------ -----
LTM earnings......................................... 11.9 - 28.7x 22.4x NM(a)
Estimated 2004 earnings.............................. 12.4 - 19.5x 17.8x NM(a)
Book Value........................................... 0.7 - 6.3x 3.3x 0.9x
---------------
(a) For the periods shown, Uni-Marts had or was projected to have negative
earnings resulting in a "NM" or not meaningful value.
The multiples for the Comparable Companies ranged from 11.9 - 28.7x LTM
earnings, 12.4 - 19.5x estimated 2004 earnings, and 0.7 - 6.3x book value. The
median values for the three multiples were 22.4x LTM earnings, 17.8x estimated
2004 earnings, and 3.3x book value. The multiples implied by the offer were not
meaningful for LTM earnings and estimated 2004 earnings, and 0.9x for book
value. The not meaningful earnings multiples result from negative earnings and
are the highest possible earnings multiples. The multiple of book value implied
by the offer was within the range of the Comparable Companies but below the
median of the Comparable Companies.
Boenning & Scattergood also calculated enterprise value multiples based on
LTM sales, LTM EBITDA and LTM EBIT. This analysis resulted in the following
multiples:
RANGE OF MULTIPLES MEDIAN OFFER
------------------ ------ -----
LTM Sales............................................ 0.3-0.6x 0.4x 0.2x
LTM EBITDA........................................... 6.1-13.5x 7.7x 7.9x
LTM EBIT............................................. 9.0-35.9x 13.6x 16.9x
The enterprise value multiples for the Comparable Companies ranged from 0.3
- 0.6x LTM sales, 6.1 - 13.5x LTM EBITDA, and 9.0 - 35.9x LTM EBIT. The median
values for the three multiples were 0.4x LTM sales, 7.7x LTM EBITDA, and 13.6x
LTM EBIT. The multiples implied by the offer were 0.2x LTM sales, 7.9x LTM
EBITDA, and 16.9x LTM EBIT. The multiple implied by the offer for sales was less
than the range implied by the Comparable Companies and less than the median
value of the Comparable Companies. The multiples implied by the offer for EBITDA
and EBIT were within the range of the Comparable Companies and greater than the
median of the Comparable Companies.
To calculate the trading multiples utilized in the Comparable Company
Analysis, Boenning & Scattergood used publicly available information concerning
the historical and projected financial performance of the Comparable Companies,
including public historical financial information and consensus analysts'
earnings estimates.
None of the Comparable Companies is, of course, identical to Uni-Marts, as
Uni-Marts differs materially in some cases from the Comparable Companies in
terms of size, product offerings, geographic location and profit margins, among
other things. No directly comparable public company exists and conclusions as to
the valuation of Uni-Marts based on the Comparable Company method is limited.
Accordingly, a complete analysis of the results of the foregoing calculations
cannot be limited to a quantitative review of such results and involves complex
considerations and judgments concerning
31
differences in financial and operating characteristics. In addition, the
multiples of stock price to estimated earnings for the Comparable Companies is
based on projections prepared by research analysts using only publicly available
information. Accordingly, such estimates may or may not prove to be accurate.
Industry Transactions Analysis
Boenning & Scattergood performed an Industry Transactions Analysis based
upon the review and analysis of the range of multiples paid in acquisitions of
majority ownership positions, in which information regarding the transactions
was publicly available, announced between January 1, 2000 and January 22, 2004
("Industry Transactions") involving transactions (i) with selling operators of
convenience stores, including independent companies, units of independent
companies and blocks of convenience stores; and (ii) with the target being based
in the United States. Specifically, Boenning & Scattergood reviewed the
following transactions for the Industry Transactions:
DATE
ANNOUNCED ACQUIRER TARGET
---------- -------- ------
10/6/2003 Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. Circle K Corporation (ConocoPhillips)
7/28/2003 Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. Clark Retail Enterprises, Inc.
5/1/2001 United Refining Company Country Fair, Inc.
7/29/2002 Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. Dairy Mart Convenience Stores, Inc.
10/21/2002 Marlaz Financial Group/Polar Fas Mart Convenience Stores, Inc
Investments Ltd.
11/3/2000 OAO LUKOIL Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc.
8/25/2003 The Pantry, Inc. Golden Gallon (Koninklijke Ahold N.V.)
5/16/2001 Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. Johnson Oil Company, Inc.
2/7/2003 Sunoco, Inc. Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC
2/24/2000 Uni-Marts, Inc. Orloski Service Station, Inc.
2/1/2001 Sunoco, Inc. The Coastal Corporation (El Paso
Corporation)
4/17/2001 Delek Group Ltd. The Williams Companies, Inc.
11/25/2003 WHP Holdings Corp. White Hen Pantry (Clark Retail Enterprises,
Inc.)
The targets analyzed in the Industry Transactions differ materially in some
cases from Uni-Marts in terms of size, product offerings, geographic location
and profit margins, among other things. Boenning & Scattergood also noted that
assumptions and comparisons regarding growth prospects, synergy opportunities,
and industry and financial market conditions at the time of the Industry
Transactions and the merger cannot be quantified. Therefore, conclusions as to
the valuation of Uni-Marts based on these transactions is limited.
Boenning & Scattergood calculated the transaction values for the target
companies based on financial results for the LTM immediately preceding the
announcement of each of the respective transactions (or the most recently
available twelve-month period prior to the announcement of the transaction),
including equity value to net income, equity value to LTM, book value,
enterprise value to LTM EBIT, enterprise value to LTM EBITDA, enterprise value
to LTM revenue and enterprise value to stores acquired. The analysis resulted in
the following multiples:
RANGE OF MULTIPLES MEDIAN OFFER
-------------------- -------- --------
Equity Value/LTM Net Income................ 12.5 - 22.6x 15.5x NM(a)
Equity Value/Book Value.................... 1.2 - 25.8x 3.4x 0.9x
Enterprise Value/LTM EBIT.................. 4.2 - 16.0x 8.4x 16.9x
Enterprise Value/LTM EBITDA................ 2.7 - 9.5x 5.4x 7.9x
Enterprise Value/LTM Revenue 0.1 - 0.6x 0.1x 0.2x
Enterprise Value/Stores Acquired........... $46,466 - $1,355,072 $332,444 $307,481
---------------
(a) For the period shown, the Company had negative earnings resulting in a
"NM" or not meaningful value.
32
The equity value multiples for the Industry Transactions ranged from 12.5 -
22.6x LTM net income and 1.2 - 25.8x book value. The median values for the
equity value multiples were 15.5x LTM net income and 3.4x book value. The
multiples implied by the offer were not meaningful for LTM net income and 0.9x
for book value. The not meaningful earnings multiples result from negative
earnings of Uni-Marts for the periods indicated and would have produced a
negative earnings multiple. The multiple of book value implied by the offer was
below the range and the median of the Industry Transactions. The book value per
share of Uni-Marts' common stock used by Boenning & Scattergood for purposes of
this analysis was $2.55. This value incorporates the dilutive impact of
Uni-Marts' "in-the-money" options on its stated book value per share of $2.89 at
January 1, 2004.
The enterprise value multiples for the Industry Transactions ranged from
4.2 - 16.0x LTM EBIT, 2.7 - 9.5x LTM EBITDA, 0.1 - 0.6x LTM sales, and $46,455 -
$1,355,072 per store acquired. The median values for the four multiples were
8.4x LTM EBIT, 5.4x LTM EBITDA, 0.1x LTM sales, and $332,444 per store acquired.
The multiples implied by the offer were 16.9x LTM EBIT, 7.9x LTM EBITDA, 0.2x
LTM sales, and $307,481 per store acquired. The multiple implied by the offer
for EBIT was greater than the range implied by the Industry Transactions and
greater than the median value of the Industry Transactions. The multiples
implied by the offer for EBITDA and sales were within the range of the Industry
Transactions and greater than the median of the Industry Transactions. The
multiple implied by the offer for stores acquired was within the range implied
by the Industry Transactions and less than the median value of the Industry
Transactions.
No target within the Industry Transactions Analysis is directly comparable
to Uni-Marts nor is any transaction identical to the merger. The merger differs,
in some cases markedly, from the Industry Transactions. An analysis of the
results, therefore, requires complex considerations and judgments regarding the
financial and operating characteristics, size and number of outstanding shares
in the public market of Uni-Marts and the companies involved in the Industry
Transactions, as well as other facts that could affect their publicly traded
and/or transaction values. The numerical results are not in themselves
meaningful in analyzing the contemplated transaction as compared to the Industry
Transactions.
Discounted Cash Flow Analyses
Boenning & Scattergood performed two Discounted Cash Flow Analyses (i.e.,
analyses of the present value of the forecasted unlevered after-tax cash flows)
of Uni-Marts based on projected financial data prepared by Uni-Marts for the
five-year period from September 30, 2003 to September 30, 2008. The first
analysis was based on a set of projections prepared by management that assumed
that all of Uni-Marts' store locations as of September 30, 2003 were operated by
Uni-Marts through the end of the five-year time period ("No Divestiture
Scenario"). The second analysis was based on a set of projections prepared by
management that assumed that Uni-Marts divested of 128 store locations between
September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2004 ("Divestiture Scenario") and received
the book value of the real estate and a multiple of cash flow for the business
assets of these stores. In each analysis, Boenning & Scattergood used a discount
rate of 10.56%, which is Uni-Marts' Weighted Average Cost of Capital as
determined through the use of the Capital Asset Pricing Model. In each analysis,
Boenning & Scattergood calculated two terminal values by using (i) the
perpetuity method, assuming a perpetuity growth rate of 1.25% (the growth rate
supplied by management which was consistent with Uni-Marts' in-store sales
growth rate over the past few years and less than the in-store sales growth rate
in the convenience store industry generally) in the No Divestiture Scenario and
1.17% in the Divestiture Scenario, which was provided by Uni-Marts; and (ii) the
exit EBITDA multiple method, assuming a 5.4x exit EBITDA multiple, which was the
median EBITDA multiple implied by the Industry Transactions Analysis. In the No
Divestiture Scenario, under both the perpetuity method and the EBITDA multiple
method, the implied share price was less than $0.00 as compared to the offer of
$2.25. In the Divestiture Scenario, based on the perpetuity method, the implied
share price was $3.33, and based on the exit EBITDA multiple method, the implied
share price was $2.53, as compared to the offer of $2.25. In considering the
results of this analysis, Boenning & Scattergood considered the achievability of
the divestiture transaction given prior unsuccessful efforts to execute a
similar
33
transaction, the likelihood that book value would be received by Uni-Marts in
exchange for the divested assets and the probability that the transaction would
occur by September 30, 2004.
Boenning & Scattergood also tested these implied share prices by performing
sensitivity analyses. Boenning & Scattergood's sensitivity analyses examined
variances of the perpetuity growth rate (using values both higher and lower than
management's estimates), the exit EBITDA multiple and the discount rate. Four
analyses were prepared that calculated an implied enterprise value. As a means
of comparison, Boenning & Scattergood calculated the enterprise value implied by
the offer price of $2.25 per share to be $89,784,403.
(IN THOUSANDS)
-------------------
LOW END HIGH END
SCENARIO METHOD VARIABLES OF RANGE OF RANGE
-------- ------ --------- -------- --------
No Divestiture Perpetuity Perpetuity growth rate: $42,767 $ 78,876
0.25% - 2.25%
Discount rate:
8.56% - 12.56%
No Divestiture Exit EBITDA multiple Exit EBITDA multiple: $39,249 $ 56,941
4.4x - 6.4x
Discount rate:
8.56% - 12.56%
Divestiture Perpetuity Perpetuity growth rate: $82,252 $122,120
0.17% - 2.17%
Discount rate:
8.56% - 12.56%
Divestiture Exit EBITDA multiple Exit EBITDA multiple: $79,631 $100,961
4.4x - 6.4x
Discount rate:
8.56% - 12.56%
In the No Divestiture Scenario the enterprise value implied by the offer
price exceeded the range of the sensitivity analyses implied under both the
perpetuity method and the exit EBITDA multiple method. In the Divestiture
Scenario the enterprise value implied by the offer price was within the range of
the sensitivity analyses implied under both the perpetuity method and the exit
EBITDA multiple method.
Financial Sponsor Transaction Analyses
Using the financial forecasts developed in connection with the Discounted
Cash Flow Analyses described above, Boenning & Scattergood performed two
Financial Sponsor Transaction Analyses for Uni-Marts. The analyses considered
the same two scenarios as described above in the Discounted Cash Flow Analyses,
the No Divestiture Scenario and the Divestiture Scenario. For purposes of the
analyses, Boenning & Scattergood analyzed how much a Financial Sponsor (an
investor that acquires companies for a limited time period in order to achieve a
return) would likely pay for Uni-Marts, given Uni-Marts' balance sheet, market
guidelines for acceptable levels of total debt to EBITDA, and average equity
contributions in leveraged buyouts. These analyses resulted in a negative amount
of equity contribution. As a result, Boenning & Scattergood examined the returns
Financial Sponsors could receive based on the offer price of $2.25. Boenning &
Scattergood assumed an initial financing structure of a maximum total debt to
LTM EBITDA ratio of 4.0x with the remaining purchase price provided by a
Financial Sponsor in the form of an equity investment. Based on a 5.4x residual
value EBITDA multiple, which was the median EBITDA multiple implied by the
Industry Transactions Analysis, and the offer price of $2.25, the implied
34
rate of return on the equity investment was less than 0.0% in the No Divestiture
Scenario and 7.0% in the Divestiture Scenario. This compares to a range of 30%
to 40% rate of return that a Financial Sponsor would generally require on
invested capital over a period of five years. Boenning & Scattergood also tested
the implied share price by performing sensitivity analyses, which involved
changing the debt, equity, required return, and other assumptions in the
Financial Sponsor Transaction Analysis. In the No Divestiture Scenario the
implied rate of return on the equity investment was less than 0.0% in all the
sensitivity analyses. In the Divestiture Scenario the implied rate of return on
the equity investment ranged between 4.5% and 9.4% in the sensitivity analyses.
Premiums Paid Analysis
Boenning & Scattergood performed a Premiums Paid Analysis for Uni-Marts
based upon a review and analysis of the range of premiums paid in acquisitions
for majority ownership positions of publicly held companies for the period
between January 1, 2001 through January 22, 2004 ("Recent Transactions")
involving transactions (i) with equity values between $10 million and $35
million and (ii) with the target company being based in the United States.
Boenning & Scattergood reviewed a total of 168 selected transactions meeting
these criteria for which the terms of the transaction were publicly disclosed.
Using information obtained from FactSet Mergerstat, LLC ("Mergerstat"), Boenning
& Scattergood obtained the premium of the offer price per share relative to the
target company's stock price one day, five days, and 30 days prior to the date
of announcement of the transaction (the "Announcement"). The following range is
the median of premiums that were offered to the target company's stock prior to
Announcement compared to the premiums to Uni-Marts' closing price on January 22,
2004 implied by the offer:
RECENT TRANSACTIONS PREMIUMS PAID ANALYSIS
RANGE OF PREMIUMS MEDIAN OFFER
----------------- ------ -----
One Day............................................ (78.0%) -- 520.0% 34.2% 27.8%
Five Days.......................................... (80.0%) -- 520.0% 39.1% 38.9%
Thirty Days........................................ (88.4%) -- 520.0% 49.6% 33.1%
The premiums in Recent Transactions ranged from (78.0%) -- 520.0% for
one-day premiums, (80.0%) -- 520.0% for five-day premiums, and (88.4%) -- 520.0%
for thirty-day premiums. The median values for premiums in Recent Transactions
were 34.2% for one-day premiums, 39.1% for five-day premiums, and 49.6% for
thirty-day premiums. The premiums implied by the offer were 27.8% on a one-day
basis, 38.9% on a five-day basis, and 33.1% on a thirty-day basis. The premiums
implied by the offer based on a one-day basis, a five-day basis, and a
thirty-day basis, all were within the range of the Recent Transactions and less
than the median of the Recent Transactions.
Liquidation Analysis
Boenning & Scattergood considered the potential per share liquidation value
to be received by holders of common stock if Uni-Marts were to liquidate based
on balance sheet values as of January 1, 2004. Boenning & Scattergood performed
a liquidation analysis for two primary reasons. One reason was that the offer
price of $2.25 per share was less than the reported book value per share as of
January 1, 2004 of $2.89 per share. As a result, Boenning & Scattergood wanted
to understand what potential value could be distributed to stockholders if
Uni-Marts liquidated its assets and liabilities. The second primary reason was
that Uni-Marts was facing liquidity challenges which Boenning & Scattergood
became aware of through Uni-Marts' quarterly and annual reports filed with the
SEC and through conversations with management. Uni-Marts management provided all
assumptions and estimates including the realizable cash values for Uni-Marts
specific asset classes, including: (i) cash, (ii) accounts receivable, (iii)
inventories, (iv) prepaid and current deferred taxes, (v) property and equipment
held for sale, (vi) prepaid expenses and other current assets, (vii) long-term
net property, equipment and improvements, (viii) intangible assets and (ix)
other assets. Uni-Marts management assumed that each specific liability class
would be fully paid, including: (i) accounts payable, (ii) accrued expenses,
(iii) revolving credit, (iv) current and non-current portions of long-term debt,
(v) deferred income and other liabilities and (vi) current and non-current
portions of capital leases. Uni-Marts management also estimated a range of
probable expenses, which
35
would be incurred in a liquidation, including: (i) operating lease payoffs, (ii)
gasoline contract termination costs, (iii) debt prepayment costs, and (iv)
supply contract termination costs. Based upon the analysis of Uni-Marts'
specific assets, liabilities and liquidation expenses, as provided by Uni-Marts
management, Boenning & Scattergood estimated the remaining value to equity
holders to be less than $0.00 per share.
The analyses performed by Boenning & Scattergood are not necessarily
indicative of actual values or actual future results, which may be significantly
more or less favorable than those suggested by such analyses. The analyses do
not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which Uni-Marts might
actually be sold, or the prices at which the Uni-Marts shares may trade, at any
time in the future. Such analyses were prepared solely for the purposes of
Boenning & Scattergood providing its opinion to the Ad Hoc Committee as to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be received in
the merger by holders of Uni-Marts shares. Because such analyses are inherently
subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors and events, including,
without limitation, factors related to general economic and competitive
conditions beyond the control of Boenning & Scattergood, Boenning & Scattergood
does not assume responsibility if future results or actual values are materially
different from those forecast. The foregoing is qualified by reference to the
written opinion of Boenning & Scattergood dated as of January 26, 2004 (attached
as Annex C to this proxy statement).
UNI-MARTS' FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
Uni-Marts does not as a matter of course make public forecasts as to future
revenues, earnings or other financial information nor has Uni-Marts historically
prepared internal budget forecasts beyond the upcoming fiscal year. Uni-Marts
did, however, prepare certain projections that it provided to Boenning &
Scattergood in connection with the proposed merger. The projections set forth
below are included in this document solely because such information was
requested by and, therefore, provided to Boenning & Scattergood.
The projections set forth below were not prepared by Uni-Marts with a view
to public disclosure or compliance with published guidelines of the SEC or the
American Institute of Certified Pubic Accountants regarding prospective
financial information. In addition, the projections were not prepared with the
assistance of or reviewed, compiled or examined by independent accountants.
While prepared with numerical specificity, the projections were not prepared in
the ordinary course and the projections reflect numerous estimates and
hypothetical assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business,
economic, market, interest rate and financial conditions and other matters, that
may not be accurate, may not be realized, and are inherently subject to
significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies,
all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond Uni-Marts'
control. Estimates are included as to Uni-Marts' gross sales of merchandise and
gasoline and the cost of sales, together with other costs and expenses for the
periods indicated. The financial projections also are based upon hypothetical
assumptions, including assumptions as to the number of Uni-Marts' stores, the
gallons of gasoline sold per store, the gallons of gasoline sold each year to
wholesale dealers, the profit margin to Uni-Marts on each gallon of gasoline
sold, the gross profit margin to Uni-Marts on merchandise sold and the aggregate
tax rate applicable to earnings generated by Uni-Marts, all for the period
indicated in the financial projections. Although it is difficult to predict the
sales prices that Uni-Marts may be able to obtain for the 128 properties
identified for the Divestiture Scenario, many of the properties were constructed
a number of years ago and have been substantially depreciated. Uni-Marts'
management believes it is likely that Uni-Marts would receive at least book
value for these properties, however, in many cases, the book value is less than
the debt secured by the property. Thus, after deducting the various expenses of
sale (e.g., brokerage commissions, legal expenses, transfer taxes, and marketing
costs) and the debt secured by the property, it is likely that Uni-Marts would
not realize any net cash proceeds from such sales. Generally, the further in the
future to which forecasts relate, the more unreliable those forecasts become due
to the difficulty in making accurate predictions of future events. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that the assumptions made in preparing the projections
set forth below will prove to be accurate, and actual results may be materially
different from those contained in the projections set forth below.
In light of the uncertainties inherent in forward-looking information of
any kind, Uni-Marts cautions against undue reliance on this information. The
inclusion of this information should not be regarded as an
36
indication that anyone who received this information considered it a reliable
predictor of future events, and this information should not be relied on as
such. While Uni-Marts has prepared these projections with numerical specificity
and has provided them to Boenning & Scattergood in connection with this proposed
transaction, Uni-Marts has not made, and does not make, any representations to
any person that the projections will be met. Uni-Marts does not intend to update
or revise the projections to reflect circumstances existing after the date they
were prepared or to reflect the occurrence of future events, unless required by
law.
Set forth on the next two pages are two sets of projections provided to
Boenning & Scattergood, one set of which assumes all of Uni-Marts' store
locations as of September 30, 2003 were operated for the five-year period
thereafter (labeled as "Without Divestiture"), and the other set of which
assumes that Uni-Marts divested 128 store locations between September 30, 2003
and September 30, 2004 and received the book value of the real estate and a
multiple of cash flow for the business assets of these stores (labeled as "With
Divestiture"). These projections should be read together with the historical
financial statements of Uni-Marts, the cautionary statements set forth above
under the heading "CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS,"
and the assumptions set forth below.
37
UNI-MARTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FIVE YEAR PROFORMA STATEMENT OF PROFIT & LOSS
WITH DIVESTITURE
(IN THOUSANDS)
% % % %
2004 CHANGE 2005 CHANGE 2006 CHANGE 2007 CHANGE 2008
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ --------
REVENUES:
Merchandise sales.................. $149,813 (16.57) $124,987 2.50 $128,112 2.50 $131,314 2.50 $134,597
Gasoline sales..................... 142,958 -- 142,958 -- 142,958 -- 142,958 -- 142,958
Other income....................... 1,528 (25.65) 1,136 (0.97) 1,125 (1.00) 1,114 (1.00) 1,103
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenues................... 294,299 (8.57) 269,081 1.16 272,195 1.17 275,386 1.19 278,658
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales...................... 233,626 (5.88) 219,891 1.20 222,535 1.11 225,005 1.19 227,678
Selling............................ 45,264 (22.91) 34,894 2.00 35,591 2.00 36,303 2.00 37,029
General and administrative......... 5,551 (31.53) 3,801 3.00 3,915 3.00 4,033 3.00 4,153
Depreciation....................... 5,017 (26.95) 3,665 1.36 3,715 1.35 3,765 1.35 3,816
Interest........................... 4,108 (36.37) 2,614 (4.36) 2,500 (4.00) 2,400 (4.17) 2,300
Provision for asset impairment..... 200 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total costs and expenses......... 293,766 (9.84) 264,865 1.28 268,256 1.21 271,506 1.28 274,977
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Earnings (loss) before income
taxes............................ 533 690.94 4,216 (6.58) 3,939 (1.50) 3,880 (5.11) 3,681
Income taxes (benefit)........... 160 690.94 1,265 (6.58) 1,182 (1.50) 1,164 (5.11) 1,104
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net earnings (loss) continuing
operations......................... $ 373 690.94 $ 2,951 (6.58) $ 2,757 (1.50) $ 2,716 (5.11) $ 2,577
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Discontinued operations:
Gain (loss) on disposal of
discontinued..................... 5,663 --
Income tax provision (benefit)..... 1,698 --
--------
Gain (loss) on discontinued
operations......................... 3,965 --
--------
Net earnings......................... $ 4,338 -- $ 2,951 $ 2,757 $ 2,716 $ 2,577
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Earnings per share from continuing
operations......................... 0.05 690.94 0.41 (6.58) 0.38 (1.50) 0.38 (5.11) 0.36
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Earnings (loss) from discontinued
operations......................... 0.55
--------
Net earnings (loss) per share........ $ 0.60 (31.97) $ 0.41 (6.58) $ 0.38 (1.50) $ 0.38 (5.11) $ 0.36
-------- ------ -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- --------
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding................. 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200
ASSUMPTIONS:
Number of stores................... 164 164 164 164 164
Gallons -- Uni-Mart stores......... 125,883 114,266 114,266 114,266 114,266
Gallons -- Distributed to
dealers.......................... 50,117 61,734 61,734 61,734 61,734
Cents/Gallon -- Uni-Mart stores.... 9.0 8.7 8.3 8.1 7.9
Cents/Gallon -- Dealers............ 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Merchandise gross margin........... 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0%
Tax rate........................... 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0%
38
UNI-MARTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FIVE YEAR PROFORMA STATEMENT OF PROFIT & LOSS
WITHOUT DIVESTITURE
(IN THOUSANDS)
% % % %
2004 CHANGE 2005 CHANGE 2006 CHANGE 2007 CHANGE 2008
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------- -------- ------- --------
REVENUES:
Merchandise sales................ $221,402 2.50 $226,937 2.50 $232,610 2.50 $238,426 2.50 $244,386
Gasoline sales................... 222,271 -- 222,271 -- 222,271 -- 222,271 -- 222,271
Other income..................... 1,650 (1.00) 1,634 (1.00) 1,617 (1.00) 1,601 (1.00) 1,585
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenues................. 445,323 1.24 450,842 1.25 456,499 1.27 462,298 1.29 468,242
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales.................... 361,828 0.91 365,118 1.23 369,612 1.35 374,617 1.29 379,435
Selling.......................... 67,209 1.50 68,217 2.00 69,581 2.00 70,973 2.00 72,393
General and administrative....... 7,142 2.00 7,285 1.99 7,430 2.00 7,578 2.00 7,730
Depreciation..................... 4,594 49.59 6,872 (7.22) 6,376 (12.06) 5,607 (8.00) 5,158
Interest......................... 6,122 (3.27) 5,922 (3.38) 5,722 (3.50) 5,522 (3.62) 5,322
Provision for asset impairment... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total costs and expenses....... 446,895 1.46 453,414 1.17 458,722 1.22 464,299 1.24 470,038
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Earnings (loss) before income
taxes.......................... (1,573) 63.60 (2,573) (13.59) (2,224) (10.02) (2,001) (10.25) (1,796)
Income taxes (benefit)......... (79) 63.60 (129) (13.59) (111) (10.02) (100) (10.25) (90)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net earnings (loss) continuing
operations....................... $ (1,494) 63.60 $ (2,445) (13.59) $ (2,113) (10.02) $ (1,901) (10.25) $ (1,706)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Loss per share from continuing
operations....................... $ (0.21) 62.47 $ (0.34) (14.18) $ (0.29) (10.63) $ (0.26) (10.85) $ (0.23)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding............... 7,200 50 7,250 50 7,300 50 7,350 50 7,400
ASSUMPTIONS:
Number of stores................. 286 286 286 286 286
Gallons.......................... 171,000 171,000 171,000 171,000 171,000
Cents/Gallon..................... 9.7 9.2 8.9 8.5 8.1
Merchandise gross margin......... 30.1% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0%
Tax rate......................... 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0%
RIGHTS OF DISSENTING STOCKHOLDERS OF UNI-MARTS
If the merger is consummated, holders of Uni-Marts' common stock who do not
vote in favor of adopting the merger agreement will have the right to seek an
appraisal of, and to be paid the "fair value" for, their shares of Uni-Marts'
common stock, instead of receiving the consideration that such stockholders
would otherwise be entitled to receive under the merger agreement. In order to
assert these rights, such stockholders must follow the procedures set forth in
Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. These rights are commonly
referred to as "appraisal rights" or "dissenters' rights." The following summary
of appraisal rights is qualified in its entirety by the text of Section 262 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law, which is reproduced in Annex D to this
proxy statement.
This summary does not constitute a recommendation that stockholders
exercise their appraisal rights, or otherwise constitute any legal or other
advice. If a stockholder wishes to exercise his or her appraisal rights, such
stockholder is urged to contact his or her legal counsel or advisors. Failure to
follow strictly the procedures set forth in Section 262 will result in a loss of
appraisal rights. If a stockholder loses his or her appraisal rights, such
stockholder will be entitled to receive the consideration determined under the
merger agreement.
Appraisal rights are available only to the record holder of shares.
References in Section 262 to "stockholders" are to record holders. References in
the summary below to "you" and "your" assume that you are a record holder. If
you wish to exercise appraisal rights but have a beneficial interest in shares
which are held of record by or in the name of another person, such as a broker
or nominee, you should act
39
promptly to cause the record holder to follow the procedures set forth in
Section 262 to perfect your appraisal rights.
Section 262 requires Uni-Marts to notify you, at least 20 days prior to the
special meeting, as to the availability of appraisal rights and to provide you
with a copy of the text of Section 262. This proxy statement, including Annex D,
serves as the required notice and text.
To claim your appraisal rights, you must do all of the following:
- Deliver to Uni-Marts prior to the vote on the merger a written demand for
an appraisal of your shares;
- Continuously hold your shares from the date you deliver your written
demand for an appraisal through the completion of the merger;
- Not vote in favor of the merger agreement; and
- File within 120 days after the effective time of the merger, if Uni-Marts
does not file within that time, a petition in the Delaware Court of
Chancery demanding a determination of the fair value of your shares.
Uni-Marts is under no obligation and has no intent to file any petition.
If you sell or otherwise transfer or dispose of your shares before the
merger is completed, you will lose your appraisal rights with respect to those
shares. If neither any stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights nor
Uni-Marts has filed a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery within 120 days
after the effective time of the merger, then all stockholders' appraisal rights
will be lost.
Voting against the adoption of the merger agreement or otherwise failing to
vote for the adoption of the merger agreement will not by itself constitute a
demand for an appraisal or sufficient notice of an election to exercise
appraisal rights. Any demand for an appraisal must be in writing, signed and
mailed or delivered to:
Uni-Marts Inc.
477 East Beaver Ave.
State College, PA 16801-5690
Attn: Mary Ann Miller
Corporate Secretary
A written demand must reasonably inform Uni-Marts of the identity of the
stockholder and of the stockholder's intent to demand appraisal of his, her or
its shares of Uni-Marts' common stock.
A demand for appraisal should be signed by or on behalf of the stockholder
exactly as the stockholder's name appears on the stockholder's stock
certificates. If the shares are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such as
by a trustee, guardian or custodian, the demand should be executed in that
capacity, and if the shares are owned of record by more than one person, as in a
joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the demand should be executed by or on
behalf of all joint owners. An authorized agent, including one or more joint
owners, may execute a demand for appraisal on behalf of a record holder;
however, in the demand the agent must identify the record owner or owners and
expressly disclose that the agent is executing the demand as an agent for the
record owner or owners. A record holder such as a broker who holds shares as
nominee for several beneficial owners may exercise appraisal rights for the
shares held for one or more beneficial owners and not exercise rights for the
shares held for other beneficial owners. In this case, the written demand should
state the number of shares for which appraisal rights are being demanded. When
no number of shares is stated, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares
held of record by the broker or nominee.
Uni-Marts will send notice of the effective time of the merger to each
stockholder who has properly demanded appraisal rights under Section 262 and has
not voted in favor of the merger agreement. Uni-Marts will send this notice
within 10 days after the effective time of the merger.
40
If you have complied with the requirements for claiming your appraisal
rights, then during the 120 days following the effective time of the merger, you
may request from Uni-Marts a statement as to the aggregate number of shares not
voted in favor of the merger agreement and with respect to which demands for
appraisal have been received and the number of holders of those shares. Upon any
request, which must be made in writing, Uni-Marts will mail a statement of that
information to you within 10 days.
If a petition for an appraisal is filed timely, the Delaware Court of
Chancery will hold a hearing on the petition to determine the stockholders
entitled to appraisal rights and the "fair value" of their shares. The
determination of fair value will not include any element of value arising from
the accomplishment or expectation of the merger. The court will also determine a
fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the
fair value of the shares. The court may determine that the fair value of the
shares is more than, the same as or less than the value you would have received
under the merger agreement. An investment banking opinion as to fairness from a
financial point of view is not necessarily an opinion as to fair value under
Section 262. The Delaware Supreme Court has stated that "proof of value by any
techniques or methods that are generally considered acceptable in the financial
community and otherwise admissible in court" should be considered in the
appraisal proceedings.
The costs of the action may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery
and taxed upon the parties as the court deems equitable in the circumstances.
Upon application of a stockholder, the court may order that all or a portion of
the expenses incurred by any stockholder in an appraisal proceeding, including,
without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and the fees and expenses of
experts utilized in the appraisal proceeding, be charged pro rata against the
value of all of the shares entitled to appraisal.
If you have duly demanded an appraisal of your shares, you will not, after
the effective time of the merger, be entitled to vote those shares for any
purpose, nor will you be entitled to the payment of dividends or other
distributions on those shares, except for dividends or other distributions
payable to stockholders as of a record date prior to the effective time of the
merger.
You may withdraw your demand for appraisal of your shares within 60 days
after the effective time of the merger. Any attempt to withdraw your demand more
than 60 days after the effective time of the merger will require the written
approval of Uni-Marts. Once a petition for appraisal is filed with the Delaware
Court of Chancery, the appraisal proceeding may not be dismissed without court
approval.
If you properly demand appraisal of your shares, but fail to perfect your
appraisal rights, otherwise lose your appraisal rights or effectively withdraw
your demand for an appraisal, your shares will be converted into the right to
receive the consideration determined under the merger agreement, without
interest.
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS
When you consider the recommendation of the Board of Directors to vote in
favor of the merger and the merger agreement, you should keep in mind that two
members of the Board of Directors (Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian) are
Affiliated Stockholders and they and members of their families and other
affiliates have interests in the merger that are different from the interests of
Public Stockholders, including the fact that they currently beneficially own
approximately 16.3% and 19.8%, respectively, of the outstanding Uni-Marts'
shares and have the right to acquire 133,000 and 35,000 shares, respectively,
upon the exercise of stock options that are exercisable on or before June 29,
2004, and are principal beneficial owners of the entity that will own the assets
and business of Uni-Marts after the merger. In addition, Henry Sahakian and Ara
Kervandjian (Uni-Marts' President) will receive approximately $300,000 from
Uni-Marts upon consummation of the merger pursuant to Uni-Marts' transaction
success bonus plan, and they will be entitled to certain preferential cash
distributions from Green Valley in the future equal to amounts that may be
payable to them pursuant to change of control agreements, but which they are
waiving ($996,866 and $523,250, respectively). Green Valley is also required to
exercise options to purchase equipment leased by certain affiliates of the
Tri-Color Members to Uni-Marts, provided that Green Valley shall not be
obligated to pay more than $190,000 for such purchases. See "SPECIAL
41
FACTORS -- Other Agreements Between Green Valley, Other Members of the Green
Valley Group and Uni-Marts." The Ad Hoc Committee and Board of Directors were
aware of these potential conflicts of interest and considered them in evaluating
the proposed merger.
Subsequent to the signing of the merger agreement, Messrs. Henry Sahakian
and Kervandjian entered into employment agreements with Green Valley that will
become effective as of the closing of the merger of Uni-Marts and Green Valley.
Mr. Sahakian will be employed as the Co-Chairman and President of Green Valley
with an annual base salary of $333,400, equal to that which he currently
receives from Uni-Marts. Mr. Kervandjian will be employed as the Executive Vice
President with an annual base salary of $300,000. Mr. Kervandjian's present
salary is $175,000. He is not a party to an employment agreement with Uni-Marts.
Each of the employment agreements with Green Valley has a two-year term and may
be extended by the majority vote of the member managers of Green Valley. In
addition, Henry Sahakian will receive a cash bonus in the amount of $480,000
payable upon receipt by Green Valley (as successor to Uni-Marts) of the cash
surrender value of a split-dollar insurance policy maintained by Uni-Marts for
the benefit of Mr. Sahakian and his family, and an additional $120,000 bonus
within 45 days after the consummation of the merger.
Other transactions between Uni-Marts and any of its Directors and officers
during fiscal years 2002 and 2003 and the first two quarters of fiscal year 2004
involve:
- Lease payments relating to an office location paid by Uni-Marts to Frank
R. Orloski, Sr. (a member of the Uni-Marts' Board of Directors) of
$30,000 during each of fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003 and $15,000 through
the first two quarters of fiscal 2004. The lease was entered into in May
2000 and has a term of five years and three five-year renewal options.
- Lease payments for the lease of four store locations and store equipment
of $35,400 during fiscal 2002, $167,700 during fiscal 2003 and $84,900
through the first two quarters of fiscal 2004 to a family limited
partnership, a rental company and an individual. Ara M. Kervandjian,
President of Uni-Marts, is a general partner with nominal ownership in
the limited partnership and a general partner and material owner in the
rental company. One store location is owned by Hrach Kervandjian, father
of Ara M. Kervandjian. The leases were entered into from April 2002 to
September 2002 with terms of four to twelve years and provide for renewal
options and annual increases not to exceed 2% per year.
- Lease payments for the lease of one store location of $30,500 during
fiscal 2002, $31,000 during fiscal 2003 and $15,800 through the first two
quarters of fiscal 2004 to Daniel D. Sahakian (a member of Uni-Marts'
Board of Directors and a member of the Green Valley Group). The lease has
a remaining term of five years with two five-year and one four-year
renewal options, with the rent increasing by 2% each year.
- Lease payments for the lease of Uni-Marts' corporate headquarters,
parking, certain storage facilities, nine store locations, store
equipment and one other location of $1,159,600 during fiscal 2002,
$1,262,200 during fiscal 2003 and $636,600 through the first two quarters
of fiscal 2004 to HFL Corporation, which is beneficially controlled by
the families of Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian. The lease for the
corporate headquarters was entered into in January 2001 for a term of 10
years and provides for an annual rent of $306,100 with 2% annual
increases in years two through five. The lease for the storage facilities
was entered into in 1999 for a term of five years, subject to a 4% annual
increase, and provide for an aggregate rent of $96,800. The aggregate
rent paid to HFL Corporation for the corporate headquarters, parking and
storage facilities was $398,100 for fiscal 2002, $402,700 for fiscal 2003
and $205,300 through the first two quarters of fiscal 2004. The nine
leases of store locations and store equipment from HFL Corporation were
entered into from October 1992 to January 2002, are for terms of three to
twelve years with renewal options and provide for annual rents
aggregating $859,400.
- Payments of $11,200 during each of fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003 and $5,600
through the first two quarters of fiscal 2004 for certain general and
administrative expenses provided by Uni-Marts to HFL Corporation.
42
In management's opinion, the foregoing transactions were made on terms that
are at least as favorable as could have been obtained with or from a third
party. All such transactions were approved by a majority of the independent
directors of the Uni-Marts' Board.
Green Valley has no present plans to enter into employment agreements with
any current executive officers or directors of Uni-Marts other than Messrs.
Henry Sahakian and Kervandjian.
EFFECTS OF THE MERGER
This is a "going private" transaction. If the merger agreement is approved
by the holders of a majority of Uni-Marts' shares, and the other conditions to
the closing of the merger are satisfied or waived, Uni-Marts and Green Valley
will complete the merger at or as soon as practical after the special meeting
with the following effects:
- The Public Stockholders will cease to have any ownership interest in, or
rights as holders of, Uni-Marts' common stock (other than the right to
receive the merger consideration);
- The Public Stockholders will no longer benefit from any increases in
Uni-Marts' earnings or the payment of dividends on shares of Uni-Marts'
common stock, if any;
- The Public Stockholders will no longer bear the risk of any decreases in
the value of Uni-Marts' common stock;
- The owners of Green Valley will be the sole beneficiaries of any future
earnings and profits, and will assume all risks associated with the
ongoing operations of the business of Uni-Marts, and will have the
ability to benefit from any strategic acquisitions, divestitures, or
other corporate opportunities that may be presented in the future;
- Uni-Marts will cease to exist, and its business will be privately owned;
- Uni-Marts' common stock will be cancelled, the registration of Uni-Marts'
common stock under the Exchange Act will be terminated, and no public
market will continue to exist for Uni-Marts' common stock;
- To the extent the merger of Uni-Marts and Green Valley triggers a taxable
gain to Uni-Marts, this tax liability will be assumed by Green Valley as
a result of the merger. Uni-Marts' net operating loss carryovers would be
available to offset such taxable gain, thus reducing the tax liability
that would otherwise be assumed by Green Valley. It is expected that the
taxable gain will be less than the amount of available net operating loss
carryovers available to Uni-Marts for federal tax purposes, which are
presently $11.2 million. Accordingly, it is not expected that the merger
will trigger a material federal tax liability for Uni-Marts or Green
Valley.
- There will not be another meeting of Uni-Marts' stockholders; and
- Green Valley, the surviving entity, will no longer be required to file
reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange
Act once the registration of Uni-Marts' common stock has been terminated.
Such reports include quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual reports on
Form 10-K, and proxy statements. Green Valley expects to save
approximately $800,000 - $1.0 million per year as a result of not being
subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, not being
publicly traded and not being listed on the American Stock Exchange.
Following the merger, we anticipate that Tri-Color will equally share
management control of Green Valley with KOTA Holdings. The profits and losses,
if any, generated by sales of Green Valley assets which were owned by Uni-Marts
at the time of the merger will be allocated 60% to Tri-Color and 40% to KOTA
Holdings, while the operating profits and losses, if any, of Green Valley
subsequent to the merger will be allocated equally between Tri-Color and KOTA
Holdings. The profits and losses allocated to Tri-Color and KOTA Holdings will
in turn be allocated to their respective members.
43
Set forth below is a table that shows (i) the percentage and dollar amounts
of the relative beneficial interests in the net book value of Uni-Marts as of
April 1, 2004 (the date of the most recent financial statements filed with the
SEC), (ii) the percentage and dollar amounts of the projected net book value of
Green Valley after giving effect to the merger, and (iii) the percentage
interest in the profits and losses of Green Valley of the following persons:
Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian, Kervandjian, Vakharia and Levinsohn.
PRE-MERGER POST-MERGER
--------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
$ AMOUNT OF % INTEREST IN
GREEN VALLEY'S PROFITS AND LOSSES
$ AMOUNT PROJECTED NET ON SALES OF ASSETS
OF UNI-MARTS' NET BOOK VALUE ACQUIRED IN
NAME % INTEREST(1) BOOK VALUE(2) % INTEREST(3) (POST-MERGER) MERGER
---- ------------- ----------------- ------------- ------------------ ------------------
Henry D. Sahakian.... 16.3% $3,179,000 40.0% $7,792,545 40.0%
Daniel D. Sahakian... 19.8% $3,861,792 40.0% $7,792,545 40.0%
Ara Kervandjian...... 0.8% $ 156,032 10.0% $1,948,136 10.0%
Raj Vakharia......... 2.2% $ 429,088 20.0% $3,896,273 20.0%
Paul Levinsohn....... 2.2% $ 429,088 20.0% $3,896,273 20.0%
POST-MERGER
---------------------
% INTEREST IN PROFITS
AND LOSSES FROM
OPERATIONS AND
SALES OF ASSETS
ACQUIRED
NAME POST-MERGER
---- ---------------------
Henry D. Sahakian.... 33.3%
Daniel D. Sahakian... 33.3%
Ara Kervandjian...... 8.3%
Raj Vakharia......... 25.0%
Paul Levinsohn....... 25.0%
---------------
(1) Percentage of issued and outstanding shares as of April 30, 2004. See
"Beneficial Ownership."
(2) Aggregate net book value of Uni-Marts as of April 1, 2004 was $19,504,000.
(3) Percentage of projected net book value post-merger.
PLANS OF THE GREEN VALLEY GROUP AFTER THE MERGER
The principal beneficial owners of Green Valley are certain members of
Uni-Marts' current management (Henry Sahakian, Daniel Sahakian and Ara
Kervandjian) and certain unaffiliated individuals (Raj Vakharia and Paul
Levinsohn) with experience in commercial real estate, finance and law. While
Green Valley will initially continue the current operations of our business and
maintain our current credit facilities in their present form, Green Valley also
plans to evaluate a variety of future business alternatives, including
restructuring these credit facilities, effecting another form of
recapitalization or debt restructuring, and selling and licensing stores. The
contemplated debt restructuring may include converting existing debt into a
short term "bullet" loan with an interest only feature or long-term
amortization. In addition, Green Valley plans to explore the possibility of a
stand-alone loan secured by Uni-Marts' real estate assets with the existing
lender and/or the possibility of a new financing source. With the additional
commercial real estate and finance expertise and contacts of Mr. Vakharia, Green
Valley believes it may be better situated to consummate these debt
restructuring, recapitalization and divestiture efforts.
There have not been any negotiations or agreements regarding Green Valley's
future business alternatives, and there can be no assurance that Green Valley
will be successful in any debt restructuring, recapitalization or divestiture
efforts. In any event, the high execution risks or substantial benefits will not
be borne by or inure to the benefit of the Public Stockholders, since they will
receive cash for their Uni-Marts' shares pursuant to the merger. The source of
the cash merger consideration will come from the members of Green Valley rather
than from any leveraging of Uni-Marts' assets. See "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Source of
Funds for the Merger."
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS IF MERGER NOT DONE
The Board of Directors has made no determination as to the direction
Uni-Marts will take if the merger is not consummated. If the merger is not
consummated, the Board of Directors will review all alternatives as to the
future strategic direction of Uni-Marts, while continuing to operate the
business substantially as presently operated; however, Uni-Marts could encounter
liquidity problems if it is unable to consummate a certain level of asset sales.
44
MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a general summary that describes the material United
States federal income tax consequences of the merger for Uni-Marts, Green
Valley, the Tri-Color Members, KOTA Management and the Public Stockholders under
provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), and existing regulations and administrative and judicial
interpretations thereunder in effect as of the date hereof, all of which are
subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. It is assumed for purposes
of this summary that all of the stockholders of Uni-Marts hold their Uni-Marts
common stock as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code,
and not as dealers or for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or
business. This summary does not address particular federal income tax
consequences that may be applicable where common stock was received pursuant to
compensation arrangements, or where common stock is held as part of a
"straddle," "hedge," "conversion transaction," "synthetic security," or other
integrated investment, nor does it address special rules that may be applicable
to certain types of stockholders, such as financial institutions, insurance
companies, tax-exempt organizations and broker-dealers. Finally, this discussion
does not address the federal income tax consequences to any stockholder who, for
federal income tax purposes, is a non-resident alien individual, a foreign
corporation, a foreign partnership or a foreign estate or trust (as defined in
the Code), nor does it consider the effect of any foreign, state or local tax
laws.
ALL STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISERS AS TO THE PARTICULAR
TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT OF ANY
STATE, LOCAL, OR FOREIGN INCOME TAX LAWS, AND THE EFFECT OF ANY CHANGES IN
APPLICABLE TAX LAWS.
Material Tax Consequences to Public Stockholders
In general, for federal income tax purposes, a stockholder receiving cash
consideration as a result of the merger will recognize capital gain (or loss) to
the extent that the amount of cash received for the shares of Uni-Marts' common
stock held by such stockholder exceeds (or is less than) the stockholder's
adjusted tax basis in such shares. The transaction may also be treated as a
taxable sale for purposes of various state, local or foreign taxes to which
particular stockholders may be subject.
For federal income tax purposes, capital gain or loss from the sale of
stock held for more than one year will be treated as long-term capital gain or
loss. In the case of an individual stockholder, long-term capital gains in
excess of capital losses will generally be subject to a maximum federal income
tax rate of 15%. Capital gain from the sale of common stock held for one year or
less will be treated as short-term capital gain, which is subject to tax at
ordinary income tax rates. Losses from the sale of capital assets may generally
only be deducted to the extent of capital gains, provided that an individual
investor may deduct up to $3,000 ($1,500 in the case of a married taxpayer
filing separately) of net capital losses per year. Unused capital losses may
generally be carried forward to future tax years.
Payments in connection with the merger may be subject to backup
withholding, at a rate of 28%. Backup withholding does not apply if a
stockholder is a corporation or comes within certain exempt categories and, when
required, demonstrates this fact. Backup withholding also does not apply if the
stockholder provides a correct taxpayer identification number or social security
number to the paying agent, and otherwise complies with applicable requirements
of the backup withholding rules of the Code. A stockholder who does not provide
a correct taxpayer identification number may be subject to penalties imposed by
the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). Any amount paid as backup withholding does
not constitute an additional tax and will be creditable against the
stockholder's federal income tax liability, provided that the required
information is furnished to the IRS. Each stockholder should consult with a tax
advisor as to qualification or exemption from backup withholding and the
procedure for obtaining an exemption. You may prevent backup withholding by
completing a Substitute Form W-9 provided by the paying agent and submitting it
to the paying agent.
The holder of an option granted in connection with the performance of
services will generally be treated as receiving ordinary income to the extent of
the cash received by such holder and the amount of
45
any withholding made on behalf of such holder. Such income will be treated as
compensation and thus will be subject to federal and state income and payroll
withholding.
Material Tax Consequences to the Tri-Color Members and KOTA Management
The Tri-Color Members and KOTA Management will be treated for federal
income tax purposes as having sold their Uni-Marts' common stock for $2.25 per
share, notwithstanding that they have assigned the right to receive the merger
consideration to Green Valley. The Tri-Color Members and KOTA Management will be
required to recognize gain or loss notwithstanding that they do not receive any
cash as a result of the merger and have a continued interest in Uni-Marts'
assets through their beneficial ownership of Green Valley. Assuming that a
Tri-Color Member and KOTA Management holds his, her or its Uni-Marts' common
stock as a capital asset, the same tax rules applicable to Public Stockholders
will apply.
Material Tax Consequences to Green Valley and Uni-Marts
There is limited authority regarding the federal income tax treatment of a
merger of a corporation into a limited liability company treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes. It is clear that the transaction
will not be considered tax-free for federal income tax purposes. Based on
applicable authority and the advice of counsel, Uni-Marts and Green Valley
intend to treat the merger as a taxable sale by Uni-Marts of all of its assets
for an amount equal to the sum of the debts and liabilities assumed by Green
Value (or to which such assets are subject), plus the amount of cash
consideration paid or payable by Green Valley for the Uni-Marts common stock and
options.
It is expected that this sale of assets will result in a net taxable gain
to Uni-Marts, but that this gain will be less than the amount of available net
operating loss carryovers available to Uni-Marts for federal income tax
purposes. Accordingly, it is not expected that the sale of assets by Uni-Marts
will trigger a material federal income tax liability for Uni-Marts. The sale of
assets may trigger state income tax liability to Uni-Marts, however, as a result
of limitations on the amount of net operating loss carryovers available to
Uni-Marts for state income tax purposes. To the extent the merger of Uni-Marts
and the deemed sale of assets triggers a tax liability to Uni-Marts, this tax
liability will be the responsibility of Green Valley as a result of its
assumption of all of the liabilities of Uni-Marts. The amount payable to Public
Stockholders in the merger will not be affected by the tax treatment of
Uni-Marts. Uni-Marts will cease to exist for income tax purposes upon the
consummation of the merger and will be required to file final federal, state and
local tax returns.
Green Valley will not succeed to any of the corporate tax attributes of
Uni-Marts. Green Valley should be treated as having purchased the assets of
Uni-Marts in a taxable transaction and its initial tax basis in such assets
should equal the amount it is treated as having paid for such assets. This
aggregate basis must be allocated among the various classes of assets acquired
from Uni-Marts in accordance with the purchase price allocation rules set forth
in Section 1060 of the Code.
FEES AND EXPENSES
Uni-Marts estimates that it will incur merger-related fees and expenses,
consisting primarily of financial advisory fees, SEC filing fees, attorneys and
accountants and other related charges, totaling
46
approximately $601,173, assuming the merger is completed. This amount consists
of the following estimated fees:
Investment banking fees and expenses........................ $150,000
SEC filing fee.............................................. $ 1,173
Legal fees and expenses..................................... $300,000
Accounting fees and expenses................................ $ 10,000
Printing and mailing costs.................................. $130,000
Miscellaneous and other expenses............................ $ 10,000
--------
Total....................................................... $601,173
========
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
For accounting and financial reporting purposes, the merger will be
accounted for as a purchase.
SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR THE MERGER
Uni-Marts and Green Valley estimate that the total amount of funds required
under the merger agreement to purchase all of the outstanding shares of
Uni-Marts' common stock owned by the Public Stockholders and to pay the cash
amounts owed in respect of stock options outstanding at the time of the
consummation of the merger will be approximately $9.3 million. This amount will
be paid from funds contributed to Green Valley by Tri-Color and KOTA Holdings,
as described below. Green Valley has no alternative plans or arrangements if it
does not receive these capital contributions from Tri-Color and KOTA Holdings,
however, as described below, the amounts to be contributed have either already
been contributed or are available by drawing on letters of credit that have been
delivered to an escrow agent.
Tri-Color will contribute approximately $10 million to Green Valley.
Approximately $3.0 million of this amount will come from cash contributed by HFL
Corporation, obtained from its corporate assets. An irrevocable letter of credit
in this amount has been delivered to an escrow agent. The balance of
approximately $7.0 million represents the value of the rights that the Tri-Color
Members have to receive the merger consideration that have been assigned to
Green Valley.
KOTA Holdings will contribute approximately $6.8 million to Green Valley.
KOTA Holdings is being funded through a capital contribution in the amount of
$2.0 million from KOTA Management and a capital contribution in the amount of
$4.8 million from an unaffiliated preferred equity investor. Of the $2.0 million
capital contribution from KOTA Management, approximately $160,000 has already
been funded in cash from the personal assets of Messrs. Vakharia and Levinsohn,
an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $1.48 million has been
delivered to an escrow agent and the balance of approximately $360,000
represents the value of the rights that KOTA Management has to receive the
merger consideration that have been assigned to Green Valley. The outside
preferred equity investor has delivered to an escrow agent an irrevocable letter
of credit in the amount of $4.8 million for its portion of the capital
contribution. The $4.8 million capital contributed by the preferred equity
investor is subject to mandatory redemption within 18 months following closing
of the merger. Prior to redemption, the investment will accrue interest at a
rate of 13% per year. The preferred equity investor will also receive a
participation fee equal to $1.74 million, payable within 18 months following
closing of the merger. If the investment, participation fee and accrued interest
are not paid in full within 9 months following closing of the merger, KOTA
Holdings is obligated to pay an additional fee of $193,333 per month until all
such amounts are paid in full.
Upon making its capital contribution to KOTA Holdings, the preferred equity
investor (JDH Holdings LLC) will accrue a preferred return on that capital
contribution, a portion of which is a fixed amount (payable only if the merger
is consummated) and a portion of which is based upon a percentage of the amount
contributed and the amount of time between the capital contribution and the
return of capital to the preferred equity investor. Once KOTA Holdings
distributes to the preferred equity investor
47
all of the preferred return and the capital contributed by the preferred equity
investor, it will redeem the preferred equity investor's membership interest in
KOTA Holdings for a nominal payment. If that redemption does not occur within
nine months, the amount of the preferred equity investor's preferred return will
increase. If that redemption does not occur within eighteen months, the
preferred equity investor will have the ability to purchase KOTA Management's
interest in KOTA Holdings for a nominal amount, becoming the sole member of KOTA
Holdings.
Each of Tri-Color, KOTA Management and the outside preferred equity
investor has delivered an irrevocable letter of credit to an escrow agent.
Tri-Color and KOTA Management also have delivered their respective shares of
Uni-Marts to the escrow agent. The closing of the merger is scheduled to occur
within 24 hours after the receipt by that escrow agent of a factual certificate
from KOTA Management (as to, among other facts, that the merger has received
stockholder approval, Green Valley has all of the funds necessary to consummate
the merger (other than the funds provided by the preferred equity investor), and
that KOTA Management and KOTA Holdings have not breached portions of their
governing documents). Immediately prior to the closing of the merger the escrow
agent will draw down on those letters of credit and release the funds and shares
it holds to Green Valley, and such funds and shares will be treated as the
capital contributions by each of KOTA Management and the outside preferred
equity investor to KOTA Holdings. The only condition to the draw on the letters
of credit and release of funds and shares to Green Valley is the receipt by the
escrow agent and the banks issuing the letters of credit of that factual
certification from KOTA Management.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Uni-Marts does not believe that any material federal or state regulatory
approvals, filings or notices are required by Uni-Marts with respect to
consummation of the merger other than (i) filings required under the Exchange
Act; (ii) filing of (A) a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of
Delaware and (B) articles of merger with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania; and (iii) filings or approvals required under state licensing
laws. Uni-Marts does not believe that these filings present an obstacle to the
prompt completion of the merger.
RISKS THAT MERGER WILL NOT BE CONSUMMATED
Consummation of the merger is subject to certain conditions, including
adoption of the merger agreement by an affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of common stock. Even if the requisite
approval of the stockholders is obtained, there can be no assurance that the
merger will be consummated. See "THE MERGER AGREEMENT -- Conditions to the
Merger."
OTHER AGREEMENTS BETWEEN GREEN VALLEY, OTHER MEMBERS OF THE GREEN VALLEY GROUP
AND UNI-MARTS
In February 2002, the Compensation Committee of the Uni-Marts Board adopted
a transaction success bonus plan to reward the three top executives of Uni-Marts
in the event that they were able to consummate a transaction advancing
Uni-Marts' then-current strategic plan and increasing stockholder value by
selling a significant number of stores above a certain price threshold. The plan
was later amended to include the sale of the entire company. Henry Sahakian and
Ara Kervandjian are two of the three officers covered by the plan, and they are
entitled to payments of approximately $200,000 and $100,000, respectively, upon
consummation of the merger pursuant to the plan. Messrs. Sahakian and
Kervandjian are also parties to change of control agreements with Uni-Marts
pursuant to which they would be entitled to payments of approximately $996,866
and $523,250, respectively, upon consummation of the merger and termination of
their employment within two years after the merger and change in control either
(i) by Uni-Marts (unless for cause) or (ii) by the employee following a
significant reduction in the employee's compensation, authority, duties or
responsibilities. Since these individuals are beneficial owners of Green Valley,
they have agreed to waive their right to receive any change of control payments
from Uni-Marts that may be due as a result of the merger. The Green Valley
operating agreement, however, contemplates preferential cash distributions to
Tri-Color (which are then to be
48
distributed to Messrs. Sahakian and Kervandjian) to provide these individuals
after the merger with amounts of money equivalent to such waived payments.
Messrs. Henry Sahakian and Kervandjian have entered into employment
agreements with Green Valley that will become effective as of the closing of the
merger of Uni-Marts and Green Valley. Mr. Sahakian will be employed as the
Co-Chairman and President of Green Valley with an annual base salary of
$333,400, equal to the salary that he currently receives from Uni-Marts. Mr.
Kervandjian will be employed as the Executive Vice President with an annual base
salary of $300,000. Each of the employment agreements has a two-year term and
may be extended by the majority vote of the member-managers of Green Valley.
Uni-Marts currently pays premiums to maintain a split-dollar insurance
policy for the benefit of Mr. Henry Sahakian and his family. This policy will be
terminated at the effective time of the merger and Green Valley will receive the
cash surrender value of such policy, estimated to be approximately $480,000. Mr.
Sahakian's employment agreement with Green Valley provides that he is to receive
a cash bonus equal to the amount of such cash surrender value promptly following
Green Valley's receipt of such amount, together with an additional $120,000
bonus within 45 days after the consummation of the merger.
Green Valley's operating agreement also requires Green Valley to exercise
options to purchase equipment leased by certain affiliates of the Tri-Color
Members to Uni-Marts, provided that Green Valley shall not be obligated to pay
more than $190,000 in the aggregate for such equipment purchases.
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
This section of the proxy statement describes material aspects of the
merger, including material provisions of the merger agreement. A copy of the
merger agreement is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A and is
incorporated herein by reference. The following discussion, however, is not a
complete statement of all provisions of the merger agreement and such discussion
is therefore qualified by reference to the more detailed information set forth
in the merger agreement. You are urged to read the entire merger agreement
carefully.
THE MERGER
The merger agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions in the merger agreement, Uni-Marts will be merged with and into Green
Valley. As a result of the merger, Uni-Marts' corporate existence will cease and
Green Valley will continue as the surviving entity. The merger will become
effective at the time a certificate of merger is filed with the State of
Delaware and articles of merger are filed with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The merger is expected to occur as soon as practicable after all conditions to
the merger have been satisfied or waived.
Uni-Marts' Board of Directors, relying upon, among other things, the
recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee, has approved, and deems the merger to be
advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Uni-Marts' stockholders,
including the Public Stockholders. Upon consummation of the merger, each issued
and outstanding share of Uni-Marts' common stock will be cancelled and converted
automatically into the right to receive $2.25 in cash per share. The Tri-Color
Members and KOTA Management have contributed to Green Valley their right to
receive the merger consideration for their Uni-Marts' shares.
The merger agreement provides that the managers of Green Valley at the time
of consummation of the merger shall continue as the managers of the surviving
entity.
49
CONVERSION OF COMMON STOCK
Once the merger is completed, the following will occur to the outstanding
shares of common stock of Uni-Marts:
- Each share of Uni-Marts' common stock, issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger, will automatically be
converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to $2.25 per
share, payable without interest;
- All shares of Uni-Marts' common stock, when converted, will no longer be
outstanding and will automatically be cancelled and retired;
- Each holder of a certificate formerly representing shares of Uni-Marts'
common stock will cease to have any rights as a stockholder of Uni-Marts,
except the right to receive the merger consideration;
- After the merger is completed, Uni-Marts will send you a transmittal form
and written instructions for exchanging your share certificates for the
merger consideration. Do not send share certificates now; and
- Uni-Marts' transfer agent, acting as exchange agent, will pay the merger
consideration to the Public Stockholders.
STOCK OPTIONS
At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding stock option to
purchase shares under Uni-Marts' stock option plans, whether vested or unvested,
will automatically be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash
(subject to applicable withholding taxes) equal to $2.25 per share, less the
applicable exercise price, for each share of common stock subject to such
options.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
Green Valley
The obligations of Green Valley to effect the merger and otherwise
consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are subject to
the satisfaction, at or prior to the closing, of conditions, among others, to
the following general effect:
- The representations and warranties of Uni-Marts contained in the merger
agreement shall be accurate in all material respects as of the date of
the merger agreement and as of the closing date, except that any
representations and warranties qualified by materiality qualifications
shall be accurate in all respects as of the date of the merger agreement
and as of the closing date;
- Each covenant or obligation that Uni-Marts is required to comply with or
to perform at or prior to the closing shall have been complied with and
performed in all material respects;
- The merger agreement and the merger shall have been duly approved by the
necessary vote of Uni-Marts' stockholders (and fewer than 15% of the
outstanding shares of Uni-Marts' common stock shall be dissenting
shares);
- Since September 30, 2003, there shall have been no events, changes or
effects, individually or in the aggregate, with respect to Uni-Marts that
constitute a material adverse effect on Uni-Marts;
- Uni-Marts shall be in compliance with certain financial parameters at the
closing date;
- There shall be no statute, rule, regulation, executive order, decree,
ruling or injunction that has been enacted or promulgated and remaining
in effect by any court or governmental entity that prohibits, enjoins or
restricts consummation of the merger;
- All governmental and regulatory notices, approvals and other requirements
necessary to consummate the merger shall have been given, obtained or
complied with;
- This proxy statement shall not be the subject of any stop order; and
50
- Green Valley shall have received the following agreements and documents,
each of which shall be in full force and effect: (A) estoppel
certificates and consents from each of the principal lenders to
Uni-Marts; (B) consents from each lessor which leases properties to
Uni-Marts to the extent such consents are required; (C) consents from
each significant vendor to Uni-Marts to the extent such consents are
required; (D) required consents from other parties to significant
agreements with Uni-Marts; and (E) a certificate of the non-foreign
status of Uni-Marts and its subsidiaries.
Uni-Marts
The obligations of Uni-Marts to effect the merger and otherwise consummate
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are subject to the
satisfaction, at or prior to the closing, of conditions, among others, to the
following general effect:
- The representations and warranties of Green Valley contained in the
merger agreement shall be accurate in all material respects as of the
date of the merger agreement and as of the closing date, except that any
representations and warranties qualified by materiality qualifications
shall be accurate in all respects as of the date of the merger agreement
and as of the closing date;
- Each covenant or obligation that Green Valley is required to comply with
or to perform at or prior to the closing shall have been complied with
and performed in all material respects;
- The merger agreement and the merger shall have been duly approved by the
necessary vote of Uni-Marts' stockholders;
- There shall be no statute, rule, regulation, executive order, decree,
ruling or injunction that has been enacted or promulgated and remaining
in effect by any court or governmental entity that prohibits, enjoins or
restricts consummation of the merger;
- All governmental and regulatory notices, approvals and other requirements
necessary to consummate the merger shall have been given, obtained or
complied with; and
- This proxy statement shall not be the subject of any stop order.
For purposes of the merger agreement, any change or event will be deemed to
have a "material adverse effect," or constitute a "material adverse change," on
one of the parties if such change or event (i) is or would reasonably be
expected to be materially adverse to the business, assets or results of
operations or condition of such party and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, or
(ii) prevents or materially delays the consummation of the merger; but there
shall not be included certain changes or events such as those arising from the
United States economy in general or the industries in which the party operates
nor, with respect to Uni-Marts, the delisting of its shares from the American
Stock Exchange, changes in its stock price or trading volume, or losses in any
2004 fiscal quarter that are consistent with losses in the comparable quarter of
fiscal year 2003.
Either party may elect to waive any condition to closing not fulfilled by
the other party except the condition that the merger agreement and merger be
approved by the requisite stockholder vote. Since most of the conditions to
closing represent obligations that Uni-Marts must fulfill, Uni-Marts does not
anticipate waiving any condition that would require a resolicitation of proxies
or otherwise pose any material risk to the Public Stockholders. In the event
Uni-Marts would waive a material condition, we will resolicit proxies.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The merger agreement contains certain representations and warranties by
Uni-Marts, including:
- Due organization and qualification
- Capitalization and subsidiaries
- Corporate power and authority and Board of Directors recommendation
- Filings with the SEC, financial statements and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance
- Information to be supplied in proxy statement
51
- Required consents and approvals
- No defaults
- Absence of certain changes
- Litigation
- Compliance with legal requirements
- Employee and labor matters and benefit plans
- Environmental matters
- Title to real property and other assets
- Relationships with suppliers
- Material contracts
- Certain business practices
- Tax matters
- Intellectual property
- Insurance
- Inapplicability of certain anti-takeover statutes
- The vote required to approve the merger agreement
- The receipt of a fairness opinion from Boenning & Scattergood
- Brokers, finders and investment bankers and their fees or commissions
- Disclosure
The merger agreement also contains certain representations and warranties
by Green Valley, including:
- Due organization and qualification
- Limited liability company power and authority
- Information to be supplied in proxy statement
- Required consents and approvals
- Litigation
- Business activities
- Brokers, finders and investment bankers and their fees or commissions
- Disclosure
- Necessary Capital
COVENANTS
Access and Information
The merger agreement requires that during the period from January 26, 2004
through the effective time of the merger (the "pre-closing period"), Uni-Marts
shall:
- Provide Green Valley's representatives with reasonable access to
Uni-Marts' employees, stores, offices and other facilities and to all
books, records and reports and financial, environmental and operating
data; and
- Promptly furnish to Green Valley monthly unaudited and quarterly audited
financial information.
During the pre-closing period, Uni-Marts must promptly notify Green Valley
in writing of the discovery by Uni-Marts of any event, condition, fact or
circumstance that caused or constitutes a material inaccuracy in any
representation or warranty or breach of a covenant made by Uni-Marts in the
merger agreement, and deliver to Green Valley an addition or modification to the
disclosure schedule delivered by Uni-Marts to Green Valley on the date of the
merger agreement. Green Valley has the right within 15 days of notice of
52
such addition or modification to terminate the merger agreement. If Green Valley
does not so terminate, each addition to or modification of the Uni-Marts
disclosure schedule will be effective to cure and correct for all purposes any
breach of any representation, warranty or covenant relating to the Uni-Marts
disclosure schedule not having read at all times as so supplemented or modified
(provided that each time Uni-Marts delivers an addition or modification to its
disclosure schedule, Green Valley has a new 15-day period to consider whether
such changes on a cumulative basis give rise to a material breach of any
representation or warranty).
Conduct of Uni-Marts' Business
The merger agreement requires that during the pre-closing period, Uni-Marts
shall, among other things:
- Conduct its operations in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice,
- Use all reasonable efforts not to take any action that would make any of
the representations or warranties of Uni-Marts contained in the merger
agreement untrue or incorrect in any material respect; and
- Use all commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its current
business organizations, keep available the service of its current
officers and employees and preserve its relationships with suppliers,
customers, distributors, lessors, creditors, employees, contractors and
others having business dealings with Uni-Marts.
During the pre-closing period, Uni-Marts shall not be permitted to take
certain actions (without the prior written consent of Green Valley), such as
issuing additional securities (except pursuant to the terms of its 401(k) plan);
incurring debt except borrowings in the ordinary course of business; increasing
officer or employee compensation; selling, leasing or acquiring any material
assets; entering into or terminating any material contract; or settling any
substantial litigation.
Non-Solicitation
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Uni-Marts has agreed that during the
pre-closing period, neither it nor any of its representatives will encourage,
solicit, participate in or initiate discussions or negotiations with or provide
any information to any person seeking to acquire a material portion of
Uni-Marts' assets or make a proposal to acquire Uni-Marts. Uni-Marts is not
prevented, however, in response to a proposal or offer that was not solicited,
from furnishing nonpublic information regarding Uni-Marts or participating in
discussions and negotiations regarding such proposal or offer, if all of the
following conditions are met:
- The Uni-Marts Board of Directors determines in good faith, after
consultation with legal counsel, that such action is required in order
for the Uni-Marts Board of Directors to comply with its fiduciary duties
under applicable law;
- Uni-Marts promptly notifies Green Valley of the identity of such party
submitting the proposal and the terms and conditions of such proposal;
- Uni-Marts receives from such person a confidentiality agreement
substantially the same as the confidentiality agreement executed by Green
Valley;
- Uni-Marts provides Green Valley with a copy of any written agreements,
proposals or other materials that Uni-Marts receives from any such person
or group; and
- Uni-Marts advises Green Valley of the status of such negotiations at any
time upon Green Valley's request, and promptly following any developments
concerning the proposal.
The Uni-Marts Board of Directors may withdraw its recommendation of the
merger or approve or recommend a superior proposal, but only (i) after providing
written notice to Green Valley that it has received a superior proposal and
specifying the material terms and conditions of such proposal, and (ii) if Green
Valley does not, within five business days after its receipt of the notice of
the superior proposal, make an offer that the Uni-Marts Board of Directors by
majority vote determines in its good faith judgment to be at least as favorable
to Uni-Marts' stockholders as such superior proposal.
53
A "superior proposal" means any bona fide proposal (i) to acquire solely
for cash and/or securities, all of Uni-Marts' shares or all or substantially all
of its assets, (ii) that contains terms that the Uni-Marts Board of Directors by
a majority vote determines in its good faith judgment to be more favorable to
Uni-Marts' stockholders than the merger, (iii) that the Uni-Marts Board of
Directors by majority vote determines in its good faith judgment to be
reasonably capable of being completed, (iv) that does not contain any "due
diligence condition" other than any due diligence condition set forth in the
merger agreement, and (v) that the Uni-Marts Board of Directors by majority vote
determines to be fully financed.
Meeting of Stockholders
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Uni-Marts will promptly take all action
necessary in accordance with applicable law to convene and hold a special
meeting to vote upon the approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
Uni-Marts' obligation to convene and hold the special meeting will not be
limited or otherwise affected by any decision by the Uni-Marts Board of
Directors to withdraw its recommendation of the merger.
Indemnification and Insurance
Pursuant to the merger agreement, all rights to indemnification existing in
favor of the persons serving as directors or officers of Uni-Marts prior to the
effective time of the merger, as provided in the Uni-Marts certificate of
incorporation and bylaws and in any indemnification agreements between Uni-Marts
and such officers and directors, will be fulfilled and honored by Green Valley.
The merger agreement also provides that for a period of six years after the
effective time, Green Valley will maintain in effect directors' and officers'
liability insurance, covering the persons covered by Uni-Marts' directors' and
officers' liability insurance policy immediately prior to the effective time, on
terms no less favorable to the insured parties than Uni-Marts' present
directors' and officers' liability insurance policy. Green Valley is not
obligated, however, to pay annual premiums to insure such parties in excess of
150% of the annual premium most recently paid by Uni-Marts, and Green Valley
will be deemed to have satisfied all such obligations in the event that it
acquires single premium tail insurance at an aggregate premium cost not more
than 300% of the annual premium most recently paid by Uni-Marts for such
insurance.
Certain Other Covenants
The merger agreement contains certain other covenants including covenants
relating to: (i) obtaining consents and regulatory approvals; (ii) contesting
any legal proceeding challenging the merger (see "BUSINESS OF UNI-MARTS -- Legal
Proceedings"); (iii) public announcements; and (iv) Green Valley's right to
cause Uni-Marts to terminate its 401(k) Plan immediately prior to consummation
of the merger.
The right to cause the termination of the 401(k) Plan immediately prior to
closing is preserved to allow the employee-participants maximum flexibility. The
Uni-Marts' Board would adopt a resolution to this effect and all Plan terms and
IRS requirements would be met. If this action does not occur before the closing
of the merger, under current IRS rules, following closing, employee-participants
would not be permitted to take their Plan balances until termination of
employment. This would mean that they may not roll the balances over to an IRA
should they choose to do so. If the Plan is terminated before the closing of the
merger, however, they would be permitted to do so, and all benefits would be
vested. The 401(k) Plan covers all Uni-Marts' employees and executives, but not
its directors.
Green Valley presently intends to adopt a comparable retirement savings
plan following the closing of the merger (but without matching
contributions -- Uni-Marts' 401(k) Plan provides a small matching contribution
contributed in the form of Uni-Marts' common stock). Following the closing,
employee-participants will be able to take their balances from the Uni-Marts'
401(k) Plan and either (i) retain the monies subject to applicable penalties and
taxes, (ii) roll the monies over to their own IRA, or (iii) roll the monies over
into the new Green Valley 401(k) Plan.
54
TERMINATION
The merger agreement may be terminated prior to the effective time (whether
before or after the approval of the merger agreement and the merger by the
Uni-Mart stockholders):
- By mutual written consent of Uni-Marts and Green Valley;
- By either Green Valley or Uni-Marts if the merger has not been
consummated by July 31, 2004, unless the failure to consummate the merger
is attributable to a failure to act on the part of the party seeking to
terminate the merger agreement;
- By either Green Valley or Uni-Marts if any court or governmental entity
has issued a final, nonappealable order or ruling which restrains,
enjoins or otherwise prohibits the merger;
- By Uni-Marts if any of Green Valley's representations and warranties
contained in the merger agreement are materially breached, or Green
Valley breaches in any material respect and fails to promptly cure any of
its covenants or agreements under the merger agreement;
- By Uni-Marts if it convenes the special meeting to approve the merger and
fails to obtain the requisite vote of its stockholders at such meeting;
- By Uni-Marts if the Uni-Marts Board of Directors receives a superior
proposal and Green Valley does not, within five business days after
receipt of notice of the superior proposal, make an offer that the
Uni-Marts Board by majority vote determines to be at least as favorable
to the Uni-Marts stockholders as such superior proposal;
- By Green Valley if any of Uni-Marts' representations and warranties
contained in the merger agreement are materially breached, or Uni-Marts
breaches in any material respect and fails to promptly cure any of its
covenants or agreements under the merger agreement;
- By Green Valley if the Uni-Marts Board of Directors recommends to its
stockholders a superior proposal;
- By Green Valley if the Uni-Marts Board of Directors withdraws or
adversely modifies its approval or recommendation of the merger agreement
or the merger or the Uni-Marts Board of Directors ceases using all
reasonable efforts to convene the special meeting, or Uni-Marts convenes
a special meeting to approve the merger and fails to obtain the requisite
vote of its stockholders at such meeting; or
- By Green Valley if certain conditions to closing are not satisfied,
principally that holders of 15% or more of the Uni-Marts shares elect
dissenters rights or Uni-Marts fails to meet designated financial
parameters (namely that Uni-Marts has, at the end of the month preceding
consummation of the merger, consolidated cash of at least $4 million, net
operating assets of at least $6 million and annual EBITDA of at least $11
million).
If Green Valley terminates the merger agreement because holders of 15% or
more of the Uni-Marts shares elect dissenters rights, then Green Valley is
obligated to commence promptly a tender offer to purchase all outstanding shares
at a price of $2.25 per share. If Green Valley acquires a majority of the
Uni-Marts shares pursuant to the tender offer and elects to deregister the
shares, non-tendering stockholders may lose all liquidity with respect to their
shares, and Green Valley will have the power to elect all members of Uni-Marts'
Board of Directors.
EXPENSES AND TERMINATION FEES
Pursuant to the merger agreement, all fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses, whether or
not the merger is consummated.
If the merger agreement is terminated because Uni-Marts receives a superior
proposal, Green Valley shall be entitled to receive a termination or "break-up"
fee of $800,000. Conversely, if the merger agreement is terminated because of a
breach by Green Valley of any representation, warranty or covenant, Uni-Marts
may recover up to $800,000 from Green Valley.
55
THE VOTING AGREEMENTS
The Tri-Color Members and KOTA Management, who beneficially own an
aggregate of 3,304,559 outstanding shares of Uni-Marts' common stock
(representing approximately 45.8% of the outstanding shares of Uni-Marts' common
stock as of April 30, 2004), have entered into voting agreements with Green
Valley providing that, until the consummation of the merger (or termination of
the merger agreement), they will vote their shares of Uni-Marts' common stock:
- In favor of the merger and the merger agreement;
- Against any proposed third party acquisition of significant assets or
stock of Uni-Marts; and
- Against any other action which is intended to interfere with, delay,
postpone or adversely affect the merger.
The parties subject to these voting agreements have also (i) appointed
Green Valley as their proxy to vote their Uni-Marts shares in accordance with
the matters covered by such voting agreements, (ii) agreed not to transfer any
Uni-Marts shares owned by them while the voting agreements are in effect, and
(iii) agreed to tender their shares if Green Valley commences a tender offer
pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement.
BUSINESS OF UNI-MARTS
Uni-Marts is an independent operator of convenience stores and discount
tobacco stores. At April 1, 2004, Uni-Marts operated 222 convenience stores and
63 Choice Cigarette Discount Outlets in Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, and
Maryland, of which 186 convenience stores and 49 Choice stores, respectively,
sold gasoline.
Most of the stores are located in small towns and rural locations. The size
of Uni-Marts stores generally ranges from approximately 1,200 to 3,300 square
feet with newly constructed stores generally having over 3,000 square feet.
Uni-Marts' largest location is 12,800 square feet in size. Typically, the
convenience stores offer a complete line of over 3,000 popular consumer items.
Uni-Marts' convenience stores offers a full array of dry grocery items, health
and beauty aids, newspapers and magazines, dairy products, tobacco products,
fountain drinks and freshly ground coffee and cappuccino products. In addition,
Uni-Marts also offers products designed to increase store traffic, such as
made-to-order proprietary and branded fast foods, as well as services including
lottery tickets, automated teller machines ("ATMs"), prepaid cellular telephones
and telephone cards and money order sales.
Uni-Marts' merchandising and marketing programs are designed to promote
convenience through store location, hours of operation, parking, customer
service, product selection and checkout procedures. Store hours are intended to
meet customer needs and the characteristics of the community in which each store
is located. Approximately 50% of Uni-Marts' convenience stores are open 24 hours
per day, while the majority of the remaining stores are open from 5:00 a.m. to
12:30 a.m. To improve speed of service, most of Uni-Marts' products and services
are sold on a self-service basis.
Uni-Marts' operations at many locations are enhanced by self-service
gasoline facilities. At April 1, 2004, 235 of Uni-Marts' stores sold gasoline,
with 137 of these locations also offering kerosene and 19 offering diesel fuel.
Uni-Marts offers BPAmoco gasoline at 34 locations, Exxon gasoline at 24
locations, Mobil gasoline at 9 locations, Texaco gasoline at 8 locations, Citgo
gasoline at one location, Sunoco gasoline at one location and Uni-Mart branded
gasoline at 157 locations. Another location sells branded gasoline on a
commission basis.
Uni-Marts' executive offices are located at 477 East Beaver Avenue, State
College, PA 16801-5690, its phone number is (814) 234-6000, and the website is
www.uni-mart.com.
56
UNI-MARTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, related notes,
other financial information and management's discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations included elsewhere in this proxy
statement.
TWO QUARTERS ENDED
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPT. 30, ---------------------------
---------------------------------------------------- APR. 3, APR. 1,
1999 2000(1) 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------------ ------------
(UNAUDITED)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Sales and other income by Uni-Marts and
its franchisees:
Merchandise sales....................... $ 96,831 $112,159 $130,341 $143,315 $140,471 $ 68,890 $ 70,464
Gasoline sales.......................... 74,037 121,156 143,257 117,007 154,076 69,631 89,749
Other income............................ 2,070 1,744 1,676 1,658 1,445 754 851
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total................................... 172,938 235,059 275,274 261,980 295,992 139,275 161,064
Cost of sales........................... 127,261 184,796 216,953 205,300 239,767 111,555 133,085
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross profit............................ 45,677 50,263 58,321 56,680 56,225 27,720 27,979
Selling................................. 34,089 34,885 39,931 39,811 40,363 20,207 20,153
General and administrative.............. 7,509 6,731 7,264 8,026 7,621 3,886 4,428
Depreciation and amortization........... 3,955 4,177 4,884 4,709 4,435 2,226 2,161
Interest................................ 2,772 3,630 4,548 3,710 3,589 1,816 1,759
Provision for asset impairment.......... 208 160 54 0 0 0 0
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(Loss) earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes and
change in accounting principle........ (2,856) 680 1,640 424 217 (415) (522)
Income tax (benefit) provision.......... (850) 268 651 179 6 (23) 2
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(Loss) earnings from continuing
operations before change in accounting
principle............................. (2,006) 412 989 245 211 (392) (524)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Discontinued operations:
(Loss) earnings from discontinued
operations.......................... (328) 772 (892) (2,703) (2,311) (2,185) (118)
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations.......................... 0 0 0 0 (720) (248) 0
Income tax (benefit) provision........ (98) 304 (354) (1,141) (88) (128) 0
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(Loss) earnings from discontinued
operations............................ (230) 468 (538) (1,562) (2,943) (2,305) (118)
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net of income
tax benefit of $310................... 0 0 0 0 (5,547) (5,547) 0
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net (loss) earnings..................... $ (2,236) $ 880 $ 451 $ (1,317) $ (8,279) $ (8,244) $ (642)
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
(Loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) earnings per share from
continuing operations before change
in accounting principle............. $ (0.29) $ 0.06 $ 0.14 $ 0.03 $ 0.03 $ (0.05) $ (0.07)
(Loss) earnings per share from
discontinued operations............. (0.03) 0.07 (0.08) $ (0.22) (0.41) (0.32) (0.02)
Loss per share from change in
accounting principle................ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.78) (0.78) 0.00
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net (loss) earnings per share........... $ (0.32) $ 0.13 $ 0.06 $ (0.19) $ (1.16) $ (1.15) $ (0.09)
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding........................... 6,887 6,989 7,053 7,099 7,165 7,143 7,200
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Working capital......................... $ (541) $ 3,500 $ 7,195 $ 1,743 $ 6,083 $ 791 $ 6,023
Total assets............................ 88,475 144,238 148,630 145,145 127,961 126,660 118,288
Long-term obligations................... 34,141 75,006 81,273 72,126 34,450 69,560 33,896
Stockholders' equity.................... 27,946 28,968 29,493 28,317 20,123 20,143 19,504
---------------
(1) In April 2000, Uni-Marts purchased the operating assets and business of
Orloski Service Station, Inc., consisting of 43 convenience stores and
gasoline dispensing stations.
57
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The convenience store industry is highly competitive, continues to be
fragmented and has relatively low barriers to entry. In addition, certain
external forces exert pressure on the industry as a whole, and on Uni-Marts as
well, including volatile fuel prices and margin pressures on gasoline and
tobacco sales. Further, certain aspects of the convenience store business
operate subject to government regulation, which include such areas as
environmental regulations, franchising laws and tobacco regulations. These
factors have combined during the past few years to constrain industry growth and
to create liquidity pressures.
Uni-Marts' revenues are derived primarily from the retail sales of
merchandise and gasoline at its 285 convenience and discount tobacco stores in
Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware and Maryland. Uni-Marts' primary competitors
include national chains such as A-Plus and 7-Eleven, and regional chains such
Sheetz, WaWa, Hess, Turkey Hill and Co/Go. In addition, Uni-Marts' business is
subject to seasonal influences with sales adversely impacted during the
unfavorable winter weather conditions. In order to meet the competitive and
industry issues, Uni-Marts has focused its efforts to improve merchandising and
marketing programs designed to promote convenience and customer service. In
addition, Uni-Marts is updating its business systems and technology to
streamline key business processes and continues to evaluate individual store
contributions to the company's overall performance.
During the last three years, sales of merchandise have generated about 50%
of Uni-Marts revenue and about 75% of its gross profit. Gasoline sales accounted
for most of the remaining 50% of revenues and generated about 22% of gross
profit.
The following table sets forth the percentage relationship of certain
expense items to total revenues. It should be noted that the primary factors
influencing the percentage relationship of cost of sales to revenues are the
volatility of gasoline prices and gross profits, and the number of stores
selling gasoline. On a percentage basis, the gross profit on gasoline sales is
significantly less than the gross profit on merchandise sold in the convenience
stores.
TWO QUARTERS
QUARTER ENDED ENDED
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPT. 30, ----------------- -------------------
--------------------------- APR. 3, APR. 1, APRIL 3, APRIL 1,
2001 2002 2003 2003 2004 2003 2004
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)
Revenues:
Merchandise sales.................... 47.4% 54.7% 47.5% 48.5% 42.9% 49.5% 43.8%
Gasoline sales....................... 52.0 44.7 52.0 51.0 56.4 50.0 55.7
Other income......................... 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.5
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total revenues.................... 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Cost of sales.......................... 78.8 78.4 81.0 80.6 83.2 80.1 82.6
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Gross profit:
Merchandise (as a percentage of
merchandise sales)................ 32.1 30.2 30.1 29.3 29.2 30.1 29.9
Gasoline (as a percentage of gasoline
sales)............................ 10.3 10.0 8.1 9.1 6.4 9.0 6.7
Total gross profit................ 21.2 21.6 19.0 19.4 16.8 19.9 17.4
Costs and expenses:
Selling.............................. 14.5 15.2 13.6 14.7 12.7 14.5 12.5
General and administrative........... 2.6 3.0 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8
Depreciation and amortization........ 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.6 1.3
Interest............................. 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.1
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total expenses.................... 20.6 21.4 18.9 20.5 17.9 20.2 17.7
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
58
TWO QUARTERS
QUARTER ENDED ENDED
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPT. 30, ----------------- -------------------
--------------------------- APR. 3, APR. 1, APRIL 3, APRIL 1,
2001 2002 2003 2003 2004 2003 2004
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)
(Loss) earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes and
change in accounting principle....... 0.6 0.2 0.1 (1.1) (1.1) (0.3) (0.3)
Income tax provision................... 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
(Loss) earnings from continuing
operations before change in
accounting principle................. 0.4 0.1 0.1 (1.1) (1.1) (0.3) (0.3)
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Discontinued operations:
(Loss) earnings from discontinued
operations........................ (0.3) (1.0) (0.8) (2.0) (0.6) (1.6) (0.1)
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations........................ 0.0 0.0 (0.2) (0.4) 0.0 (0.2) 0.0
Income tax provision (benefit)....... (0.1) (0.4) 0.0 (0.1) 0.0 (0.1) 0.0
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
(Loss) earnings from discontinued
operations........................... (0.2) (0.6) (1.0) (2.3) (0.6) (1.7) (0.1)
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net of income
tax benefit.......................... 0.0 0.0 (1.9) 0.0 0.0 (4.0) 0.0
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Net earnings (loss).................... 0.2% (0.5)% (2.8)% (3.4)% (1.7)% (6.0)% (0.4)%
===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
Quarters Ended April 1, 2004 and April 3, 2003
At April 1, 2004, Uni-Marts operated 285 stores, which were comprised of
222 Uni-Mart convenience stores and 63 Choice Cigarette Discount Outlets
("Choice"). Of these locations, two were franchised and 235 offered self-service
gasoline. In the fiscal quarter, Uni-Marts sold one Uni-Mart convenience store.
Uni-Marts had five fewer convenience stores and four fewer Choice stores in
operation in the second fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2004 compared to the
second fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2003.
As part of Uni-Marts' plan to divest stores, in fiscal 2003, Uni-Marts
reclassified the assets of 130 stores on its balance sheet as properties held
for sale and classified the income and expense of such stores as discontinued
operations. At April 1, 2004, Uni-Marts had 122 remaining stores classified as
assets held for sale on its balance sheet with a net book value of $40.5
million. Although these stores are now classified as discontinued operations,
Uni-Marts intends to continue to operate these stores pending successful
negotiation of their sale or sub-lease. See Note A to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for the second fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2004 for
limitations on Uni-Marts' ability to sell or lease assets without the consent of
Green Valley.
Continuing Operations
For the second quarter of fiscal 2004, ended April 1, 2004, revenues from
continuing operations of 163 stores were $79.7 million, an increase of $11.6
million, or 16.9%, compared to revenues of $68.2 million for the second quarter
of fiscal 2003. The increase in revenues is primarily the result of a 29.4%
increase in gasoline sales as a result of a 34.5 cent per gallon increase in the
average reported retail price per gallon of petroleum sold at Uni-Marts'
locations in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 compared to the second
quarter of fiscal year 2003. The 34.5 cent per gallon price increase includes
the effect of Uni-Marts' change in payment method for Pennsylvania gasoline
taxes of 25.9 cents per gallon. As previously reported, in June 2003, Uni-Marts
changed its payment method for gasoline taxes for its Pennsylvania stores and
now includes the gasoline taxes in its average reported retail price per gallon
and its cost of sales. This change in payment method has no effect on gross
profits.
59
Merchandise sales were $34.2 million, an increase of $1.1 million, or 3.4%,
compared to merchandise sales of $33.1 million recorded in the second quarter of
fiscal 2003. Other income increased by $204,000 to $540,000 in the current
fiscal quarter primarily due to gains on the sale of assets of $154,000.
Merchandise sales at comparable stores increased by 5.9% and gasoline gallons
sold at comparable stores increased by 4.2% in the second quarter of fiscal 2004
compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2003.
Gasoline sales in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 were $45.0
million, an increase of $10.2 million, compared to gasoline sales of $34.8
million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. The gasoline sales increase
includes approximately $6.1 million for gasoline taxes for Uni-Marts'
Pennsylvania stores which was not included in gasoline sales in the second
quarter of fiscal year 2003.
In the second fiscal quarter of 2004, when compared to the second fiscal
quarter of 2003, increases and volatility in wholesale petroleum costs resulted
in increases in retail petroleum prices and contributed to lower gross margins
per gallon sold. Uni-Marts continues to evaluate alternatives to mitigate the
volatility in wholesale petroleum costs. Generally, increased wholesale
petroleum costs impacts consumer demand, overall customer traffic and indirectly
affects our merchandise sales. In addition, increases in wholesale cigarette
costs and tax increases on tobacco products have an adverse effect on consumer
demand for such products. These factors generally impact our retail price of
cigarettes, sales volumes, merchandise gross profits and overall customer
traffic.
Gross profits on merchandise sales increased by $297,000 to $10.0 million
in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. Higher merchandise sales contributed to
the 3.1% increase in merchandise gross margins, while the merchandise gross
profit rate was relatively unchanged in the second quarter of fiscal 2004
compared to the same period in fiscal 2003. Merchandise sales increased due
primarily to the effects of increases in costs and tax increases on tobacco
products, offset by fewer stores in operation in the current quarter in
comparison to the second quarter of fiscal 2003.
Gross profits on gasoline sales declined by $286,000, or 9.1%, to $2.9
million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, compared to gasoline gross margins
of $3.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. A 2.6% increase in
gasoline gallons sold in the current fiscal quarter was offset by an 11.4%
decline in the gasoline gross profit per gallon sold. Gasoline gallons increased
due in part to milder weather conditions during the current fiscal quarter in
comparison to harsh weather conditions reported in the second quarter of the
prior fiscal year.
Uni-Marts reported a 1.5% increase in selling expenses in the first fiscal
quarter to $10.1 million due primarily to higher credit card fees resulting from
higher retail petroleum prices, offset by fewer stores in operation in the
current period in comparison to the same period in fiscal 2003. General and
administrative expense increased by 12.4%, or $246,000, to $2.2 million,
compared to $2.0 million, due primarily to a $358,000 increase in legal fees as
a result of expenses related to Uni-Marts' merger negotiations, divestiture
plan, and litigation expenses, as well as higher audit fees in the current
fiscal quarter. These increases in general and administrative expenses were
offset by a reduction in expenses related to Uni-Marts' improvements to its
information systems. Depreciation and amortization expense declined by $34,000,
or 3.1%, to $1.1 million as the result of lower levels of capital expenditures
and fewer stores in operation in the current fiscal quarter. Interest expense
declined by 2.9%, or $26,000, to $869,000 due to lower borrowing levels and
interest rates in the second fiscal quarter of 2004, in comparison to the second
fiscal quarter of 2003.
For the second quarter of fiscal 2004, losses from continuing operations,
before income taxes and change in accounting principle, were $895,000, compared
to losses from continuing operations, before income taxes and change in
accounting principle, of $775,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2003.
Uni-Marts recorded a provision for income taxes of $1,000, compared to an income
tax benefit of $42,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. The lower tax rate
is due to Uni-Marts' increased valuation allowance in fiscal 2003. Losses from
continuing operations before the change in accounting principle were $896,000,
or $0.13 per share, for the second quarter of fiscal 2004, compared to losses
from continuing operations before the change in accounting principle of
$733,000, or $0.10 per share, for the prior year's second fiscal quarter.
60
Discontinued Operations
Uni-Marts reported a loss from discontinued operations in the second
quarter of fiscal 2004 of $456,000, compared to a loss of $1.4 million in the
second quarter of fiscal 2003. The loss from discontinued operations lessened
primarily as a result of the discontinuance of $778,000 of depreciation on
assets held for sale in the current fiscal quarter. The improvement in the loss
from discontinued operations was also attributed to a decline in selling
expenses of $84,000 due to fewer stores in operation and a $105,000 decline in
interest expense primarily due to lower borrowing levels and interest rates. In
the second quarter of fiscal 2004, there was no disposal of discontinued
operations, compared to a loss of $248,000 on disposal of discontinued
operations for the comparable quarter of fiscal 2003. Uni-Marts had no income
tax provision in the current fiscal quarter, compared to an income tax benefit
of $84,000 for the second quarter of fiscal 2003. The lower tax rate is due to
Uni-Marts' increased valuation allowance in fiscal 2003. Total losses from
discontinued operations for the second fiscal quarter of 2004 were $456,000, or
$0.06 per share, compared to losses on discontinued operations of $1.5 million,
or $0.22 per share, in the second quarter of fiscal 2003.
Other
During fiscal 2003, Uni-Marts increased its valuation allowance against the
deferred tax asset because it was determined that it is more likely than not
that Uni-Marts will not be able to fully utilize the NOL's. This increase in the
reserve has resulted in a minimum tax provision in comparison to a 5.3% tax
benefit in the second quarter of fiscal 2003.
Total net losses for continued and discontinued operations for the second
quarter ended April 1, 2004 were $1.4 million, or $0.19 per share, compared to
total net losses of $2.3 million, or $0.32 per share, for the second quarter of
fiscal 2003.
Two Quarters Ended April 1, 2004 and April 3, 2003
Continuing Operations
Total revenues for the first two quarters of fiscal 2004 were $161.1
million, an increase of $21.8 million, or 15.6%, compared to total revenues of
$139.3 million for the two quarters ended April 3, 2003. Revenues increased due
principally to a $20.1 million, or 28.9%, increase in gasoline sales for the
current reporting period to $89.7 million, compared to $69.6 million for the
first six months of fiscal 2003. The increase in gasoline sales was due to a
35.0 cent per gallon increase in the average reported retail price per gallon of
petroleum sold in the current reporting period, as the result of higher retail
petroleum prices in the first six months of fiscal 2004 and the effects of
Uni-Marts' change in its payment method for Pennsylvania gasoline taxes that
became effective in June 2003. For the first six months of fiscal 2004,
merchandise sales increased by $1.6 million, or 2.3%, to $70.5 million, compared
to merchandise sales of $68.9 million in the first six months of fiscal 2003.
Merchandise sales at comparable stores increased by 4.5% and gasoline gallons
sold at comparable stores increased by 2.6% from the first six months of fiscal
2003. Other income increased by $97,000, or 12.9%, to $851,000 for the current
six-month period due primarily to gains on the sale of assets of $146,000,
offset by lower rental income and commissions due to fewer stores in operation.
Increases in wholesale cigarette costs and tax increases on tobacco
products have an adverse effect on consumer demand for such products. These
factors impact our retail price of cigarettes, sales volumes, merchandise gross
profits and overall customer traffic. While Uni-Marts attempts to maintain its
gross profit margin on tobacco products by passing these types of price
increases on to its customers, competitive pressures in specific markets prevent
it from doing so. As a result, tobacco unit sales are negatively impacted as
well as the gross profit associated with these products. In the first six months
of fiscal 2004, these factors contributed to higher merchandise sales and a
decline in the merchandise gross margin rate when compared to the first six
months of fiscal 2003.
61
Gross profits on merchandise sales were $21.1 million, an increase of 1.6%
compared to merchandise gross profits of $20.7 million for the first six months
of fiscal 2003. The increase in merchandise gross profits was primarily the
result of higher merchandise sales levels, offset by a 0.2% decline in the
merchandise gross margin rate for the first two quarters of fiscal 2004.
Gross profits on gasoline sales for the first two quarters of fiscal 2004
declined by 2.9% to $6.1 million compared to gasoline gross profit margins of
$6.2 million reported in the first two quarters of fiscal 2003. The decline was
due to a 3.4% decline in the gross margin rate per gallon sold, offset by a 0.6%
increase in gasoline gallons sold in the first six months of fiscal 2004.
Selling expenses declined by $54,000, or 0.3%, to $20.2 million due to
lower maintenance expenses as a result of fewer stores in operation in the
current period, offset by increases in credit card fees resulting from higher
retail petroleum prices. General and administrative expense increased by 14.0%,
or $542,000, to $4.4 million for the first six months of fiscal 2004 due to
increased legal and professional fees of $805,000 as a result of expenses
related to merger negotiations, litigation expenses, Uni-Marts' divestiture plan
and higher audit fees. These increased expenses were offset by lower expenses
related to Uni-Marts' improvements to its information systems and the
non-replacement of corporate personnel in an attempt to reduce general and
administrative overhead. Depreciation and amortization expense for the first six
months of fiscal 2004 declined by 2.9% to $2.2 million due to lower levels of
capital expenditures in recent years and fewer stores in operation. Interest
expense declined by $57,000, or 3.1%, to $1.8 million for the first six months
of fiscal 2004 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2003 due to lower
interest rates and borrowing levels.
For the first six months of fiscal 2004, losses from continuing operations,
before income taxes and change in accounting principle, were $522,000, compared
to losses from continuing operations, before income taxes and change in
accounting principle, of $415,000 for the first six months of fiscal 2003.
Uni-Marts recorded a provision for income taxes of $2,000, compared to an income
tax benefit of $23,000 for the first six months of fiscal 2003. Losses from
continuing operations before a change in accounting principle were $524,000, or
$0.07 per share, compared to losses from continuing operations before the change
in accounting principle of $392,000, or $0.05 per share, for the first six
months of fiscal 2003.
Discontinued Operations
Uni-Marts reported a loss from discontinued operations of $118,000 for the
first six months of fiscal 2004, compared to a loss from discontinued operations
of $2.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2003. The loss from
discontinued operations lessened for the first six months of fiscal 2004 due
primarily to reductions in depreciation and amortization and interest expenses
of $1.7 million, as well as lower selling expenses due to fewer stores in
operation. These positive impacts were offset by lower merchandise and gasoline
gross profits in the first six months of fiscal 2004. In the two quarters ended
April 1, 2004, there was no disposal of discontinued operations, compared to a
loss of $248,000 on disposal of discontinued operations for the comparable
period of fiscal year 2003. Uni-Marts recorded an income tax benefit of $128,000
for the loss on discontinued operations for the first six months of fiscal year
2003. Total losses on discontinued operations for the six months ended April 1,
2004 was $118,000, or $0.02 per share, compared to losses of $2.3 million, or
$0.32 per share, for the first six months of fiscal 2003.
Other
In the first quarter of fiscal 2003, Uni-Marts reported a one-time non-cash
charge of $5.5 million, or a loss of $0.78 per share, due to the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets." SFAS 142 requires that assets with indefinite lives not be
amortized but tested annually for impairment and provides specific guidelines
for such testing. In accordance with SFAS 142, Uni-Marts discontinued the
amortization of goodwill as of October 1, 2002 and completed its impairment
testing during fiscal year 2003, which resulted in the write-off of the total
goodwill balance.
62
During fiscal 2004, Uni-Marts increased its valuation allowance against the
deferred tax asset because it was determined that it is more likely than not
that Uni-Marts will not be able to fully utilize the NOL's. This increase in the
reserve has resulted in a minimum tax provision in the first two quarters of
fiscal 2004 compared to a 5.3% tax benefit in the first two quarters of fiscal
2003.
Total net losses for the two quarters ended April 1, 2004 were $642,000, or
$0.09 per share, compared to total net losses of $8.2 million, or $1.15 per
share, for the two quarters ended April 3, 2003.
Fiscal Year 2003 Compared to Fiscal Year 2002
At September 30, 2003, Uni-Marts operated 292 stores, which were comprised
of 225 Uni-Mart convenience stores and 67 Choice Cigarette Discount Outlets
("Choice"). Of these locations, three were franchised and 237 offered
self-service gasoline. Uni-Marts closed two convenience stores, and sold four
convenience stores, one Choice store and one non-operating location in fiscal
year 2003 as part of its divestiture plan.
In fiscal 2003, Uni-Marts announced plans to divest 130 stores and
reclassified the assets relating to these stores as discontinued operations and
reclassified the related debt of $34.4 million as current maturities. At
September 30, 2003, Uni-Marts had 128 remaining stores classified as properties
held for sale on its balance sheet with a net book value of $41.0 million. The
income and expense relating to these stores is classified as discontinued
operations. Uni-Marts intends to continue to operate these stores pending
successful negotiation of their sale or sub-lease.
Continuing Operations
Revenues from continuing operations of 164 stores for fiscal year 2003 were
$296.0 million, an increase of $34.0 million, or 13.0%, compared to revenues of
$262.0 million in fiscal year 2002. This increase is primarily the result of a
31.7%, or 31.9 cent per gallon, increase in gasoline sales at continuing
operations as a result of an increase in the average reported retail price per
gallon of petroleum sold at Uni-Marts' locations in fiscal year 2003. The 31.9
cent per gallon price increase includes the effect of the change in Uni-Marts'
payment method for Pennsylvania gasoline taxes of 25.9 cents per gallon that
became effective in June 2003. As reported in Uni-Marts' Form 10-Q filed for the
period ended July 3, 2003, in June 2003, Uni-Marts changed its payment method
for gasoline taxes for its Pennsylvania stores and now includes the gasoline
taxes in its average reported retail price per gallon and its cost of sales.
This change in payment method has no effect on gross profits.
Gasoline sales in fiscal year 2003 were $154.1 million, compared to $117.0
million in fiscal year 2002, an increase of $37.1 million. The gasoline sales
increase in fiscal year 2003 includes approximately $7.1 million for gasoline
taxes for Uni-Marts' Pennsylvania stores reported in the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2003, which was not included in gasoline sales in fiscal year 2002.
In fiscal year 2003, merchandise sales were $140.5 million, a decline of
$2.8 million, or 2.0%, compared to merchandise sales of $143.3 million in fiscal
year 2002. At comparable stores, merchandise sales from continuing operations
were relatively flat, while gasoline gallons sold from continuing operations
increased by 1.0% from fiscal 2002 levels. Uni-Marts had seven fewer stores, two
of which sold gasoline, in operation in fiscal year 2003 compared to fiscal year
2002, contributing to lower merchandise sales levels. Other income declined by
12.9% to $1.4 million, primarily as a result of a $100,000 decline in commission
income and a $40,000 decline in interest, dividend, royalty and rental income.
In addition, other income in fiscal year 2002 included a $50,000, one-time
insurance settlement.
Gross profits on merchandise sales declined by $1.0 million, or 2.2%, to
$42.3 million, compared to merchandise gross profits of $43.3 million for fiscal
year 2002. Fewer stores in operation in fiscal year 2003 and a 0.7% lower
merchandise gross profit rate related primarily to increased proportion of
tobacco product sales at lower gross profit rates contributed to the decline in
merchandise gross margins in fiscal year 2003 compared to fiscal year 2002.
Increases in wholesale cigarette costs and tax increases on tobacco products
have an adverse effect on consumer demand for such products. These factors
impact our retail price of
63
cigarettes, sales volumes, merchandise gross profits and overall customer
traffic. While Uni-Marts attempts to maintain its gross profit on tobacco
products by passing these types of price increases on to its customers,
competitive pressures in specific markets often prevent this. As a result,
tobacco unit sales and gross profit on these procedures can be negatively
impacted.
Gross profits on gasoline sales in fiscal year 2003 increased by $722,000,
or 6.2%, to $12.5 million compared to gasoline gross profits of $11.7 million in
fiscal year 2002. Gasoline gross margins increased primarily due to a 0.8%
increase in gasoline gallons sold at Uni-Marts' locations in fiscal year 2003
compared to fiscal year 2002. While fewer gasoline locations were in operation
for the comparable periods, gasoline gallons increased due to a full year's
operation in fiscal 2003 of two high volume locations which were opened in
fiscal year 2002.
Selling expenses increased by $500,000, or 1.4%, to $40.3 million, compared
to $39.8 million in fiscal year 2002 due primarily to increases in credit card
fees resulting from higher retail petroleum prices and the impact of two new
high volume locations, offset by fewer stores in operation. General and
administrative expenses declined by $400,000, or 5.1%, to $7.6 million from $8.0
million in fiscal year 2002, principally due to a $550,000 decline in salaries
and related expenses. This reduction was principally due to fewer employees in
2003 as a result of improvements to Uni-Marts' information systems and the
non-replacement of corporate personnel in an attempt to reduce general and
administrative overhead. Additionally, general and administrative expenses were
impacted by a $90,000 decline in advertising and supplies expenses, offset by a
$260,000 increase in legal and audit fees resulting from Uni-Marts' divestiture
plans and the adoption of a shareholder rights plan. Depreciation and
amortization expense declined by $300,000, or 5.8%, to $4.4 million as the
result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142
("SFAS No. 142"), lower levels of capital expenditures and fewer stores in
operation in fiscal year 2003. Lower borrowing levels and lower interest rates
resulted in a $100,000, or 3.3%, decline in interest expense in fiscal year 2003
to $3.6 million from $3.7 million in the prior fiscal year.
Earnings from continuing operations in fiscal year 2003, before income
taxes and change in accounting principle, were $217,000, compared to earnings
from continuing operations, before income taxes and change in accounting
principle, of $424,000 in fiscal year 2002. Uni-Marts recorded a provision for
income taxes of $6,000, compared to an income tax provision of $179,000 in
fiscal year 2002. Net earnings from continuing operations before a change in
accounting principle were $211,000, or $0.03 per share, for fiscal year 2003,
compared to net earnings from continuing operations before a change in
accounting principle of $245,000, or $0.03 per share, for fiscal year 2002.
Discontinued Operations
The loss from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2003 was $2.3
million, compared to a loss of $2.7 million in fiscal year 2002. The decrease in
loss from discontinued operations was primarily the result of a $1.0 million
reduction in depreciation and amortization due to the discontinuance of
depreciation on assets held for sale. The decrease in loss was also a result of
lower interest expenses due to lower borrowing levels and interest rates and
higher gasoline gross margins, offset by lower merchandise gross profits,
increased credit card fees resulting from higher retail petroleum prices and
higher levels of store maintenance. In fiscal year 2003, the loss on disposal of
discontinued operations was $720,000 in comparison to no loss in fiscal year
2002. Uni-Marts recorded an income tax benefit of $88,000 for the loss on
discontinued operations in fiscal year 2003, compared to an income tax benefit
of $1.1 million for the prior fiscal year. The net loss from discontinued
operations for fiscal year 2003 was $2.9 million, or $0.41 per share, compared
to a net loss of $1.6 million, or $0.22 per share, in fiscal year 2002.
Other
The loss from change in accounting principle in fiscal year 2003 was a
one-time, non-cash charge of $5.5 million, or $0.78 per share, due to the
adoption of SFAS 142 and the write-off of Uni-Marts' goodwill.
64
During fiscal year 2003, Uni-Marts increased its valuation allowance
against the deferred tax asset because it was determined that it is more likely
than not that Uni-Marts will not be able to fully utilize the net operating loss
("NOL") carryforward. This increase in the reserve has resulted in a 4.5% tax
benefit in comparison to a 42.2% tax benefit in fiscal year 2002.
Total net losses for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 for continued
and discontinued operations were $8.3 million, or $1.16 per share, compared to
total net losses of $1.3 million, or $0.19 per share, in fiscal year 2002.
Fiscal Year 2002 Compared to Fiscal Year 2001
At September 30, 2002, Uni-Marts operated 299 stores, which were comprised
of 231 Uni-Mart convenience stores and 68 Choice Cigarette Discount Outlets. Of
these locations, four were franchised and 239 offered self-service gasoline.
Uni-Marts had one less store in operation in fiscal year 2002 compared to fiscal
year 2001.
Continuing Operations
Revenues from continuing operations of 169 stores in fiscal year 2002 were
$262.0 million, a decline of $13.3 million, or 4.8%, compared to revenues of
$275.3 million in fiscal year 2001. This decline is the net result of a $26.2
million decline in gasoline sales, offset by a $13.0 million increase in
merchandise sales. Merchandise sales increased to $143.3 million, or 10.0%, from
$130.3 million in fiscal year 2001. Higher comparable store sales levels, as
well as contributions from higher retail cigarette prices in the fourth quarter
of fiscal year 2002 contributed to the merchandise sales growth. Gasoline sales
declined to $117.0 million, or 18.3%, from $143.2 million in fiscal year 2001,
primarily due to a 19.9 cent per gallon decline in the average reported retail
price per gallon of petroleum sold at Uni-Marts' locations. At comparable
stores, merchandise sales from continuing operations increased by 7.6%, while
gasoline gallons sold from continuing operations declined by 1.1% from fiscal
year 2001 levels. Other income in fiscal year 2002 declined by $18,000 to $1.7
million.
Gross profits on merchandise sales increased by $1.4 million, or 3.5%, to
$43.3 million in fiscal year 2002, compared to merchandise gross profit margins
of $41.9 million in fiscal year 2001. Merchandise gross profits increased,
despite a 1.9% decline in the merchandise gross profit rate for the comparable
periods.
Gross profits on gasoline sales declined by $3.1 million, or 20.8%, to
$11.7 million in fiscal year 2002 compared to $14.8 million in fiscal year 2001.
A 2.7% decline in gasoline gallons sold and an 18.5% decline in gross profits
per gallon sold contributed to the decline in gasoline gross margins in fiscal
year 2002 compared to fiscal year 2001. Instability of the petroleum wholesale
markets and increased retail competition resulted in lower gasoline gross profit
margins in fiscal year 2002 when compared to fiscal year 2001.
Selling expenses declined by 0.3% to $39.8 million in fiscal year 2002,
compared to $39.9 million in fiscal year 2001. General and administrative
expense increased by $800,000, or 10.5%, to $8.0 million from $7.2 million in
fiscal year 2001 due principally to increased legal, professional and audit
fees. These increased fees relate primarily to changes in corporate governance
and corporate securities adopted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in
February 2002, as well as the hiring of financial advisors in April 2002 and
higher audit fees. Higher salary levels also affected the general and
administrative expense category. Depreciation and amortization expense declined
in fiscal year 2002 to $4.7 million from $4.9 million due to lower levels of
capital expenditures in fiscal year 2002. Lower borrowing levels and lower
interest rates resulted in a $800,000, or 18.4%, decline in interest expense in
fiscal year 2002 to $3.7 million from $4.5 million in the prior fiscal year.
Uni-Marts recorded a $54,000 provision for asset impairment in fiscal year 2001.
Earnings from continuing operations in fiscal year 2002, before income
taxes and change in accounting principle, were $424,000, compared to earnings
from continuing operations, before income taxes and
65
change in accounting principle, of $1.6 million in fiscal year 2001. Uni-Marts
recorded a provision for income taxes of $179,000 in fiscal year 2002, compared
to an income tax provision of $651,000 in fiscal year 2001. Net earnings from
continuing operations before a change in accounting principle were $245,000, or
$0.03 per share, for fiscal year 2002, compared to net earnings from continuing
operations before the change in accounting principle of $989,000, or $0.14 per
share, for fiscal year 2001.
Discontinued Operations
The loss from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2002 was $2.7
million, compared to a loss of $892,000 in fiscal year 2001. This increase in
loss from discontinued operations in fiscal year 2002 was primarily the result
of lower gasoline gross profits, increased credit card fees resulting from
higher retail petroleum prices and higher levels of store maintenance, offset by
higher merchandise gross margins and reductions in depreciation and amortization
and interest expenses. There was no loss on the disposal of discontinued
operations for fiscal year 2002 and fiscal year 2001, respectively. Uni-Marts
recorded an income tax benefit of $1.1 million for the loss on discontinued
operations in fiscal year 2002, compared to an income tax benefit of $354,000
for the prior fiscal year. The net loss from discontinued operations for fiscal
year 2002 was $1.6 million, or $0.22 per share, compared to a net loss of
$538,000, or $0.08 per share, in fiscal year 2001.
Other
In 2002, Pennsylvania extended the net operating loss ("NOL") carryforward
period from 10 to 20 years which resulted in a higher effective tax benefit for
fiscal year 2002. This change resulted in a 42.2% tax benefit in fiscal year
2002 in comparison to a 39.7% tax benefit in fiscal year 2001.
Total net losses for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 for continued
and discontinued operations were $1.3 million, or $0.19 per share, compared to
total net earnings of $451,000, or $0.06 per share, in fiscal year 2001.
66
SEASONALITY AND UNAUDITED QUARTERLY RESULTS
Uni-Marts' business generally has been subject to seasonal influences with
higher sales in the third and fourth quarters of each fiscal year, since
customers tend to purchase more convenience items, such as ice, beverages and
fast food, and more gasoline during the warmer months. Due to adverse weather
conditions, merchandise sales for the second fiscal quarter generally have been
lower than other quarters. In addition, because of price volatility, gasoline
profit margins fluctuate significantly throughout the year.
THREE MONTHS ENDED
--------------------------------------------------------------
JAN.3, APRIL 4, JULY 4, SEPT. 30, JAN. 2, APRIL 3,
2002 2002 2002 2002 2003 2003
-------- -------- ------- --------- ------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
REVENUES:
Merchandise sales.......... $35,839 $32,159 $36,074 $39,243 $36,018 $32,012
Gasoline sales............. 27,474 24,779 32,418 32,336 35,131 35,361
Other income............... 386 415 411 446 417 336
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total revenues........... 63,699 57,353 68,903 72,025 71,566 67,709
Cost of sales................ 48,783 44,187 54,443 57,887 56,982 54,578
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Gross profit................. 14,916 13,166 14,460 14,138 14,584 13,131
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Selling.................... 10,104 9,781 9,945 9,981 10,375 9,847
General & administrative... 1,902 2,141 2,122 1,861 1,901 1,985
Depreciation &
amortization............. 1,194 1,166 1,174 1,175 1,120 1,099
Interest................... 1,025 837 916 932 927 889
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Earnings (loss) from
continuing operations
before income taxes and
change in accounting
principle.................. 691 (759) 303 189 261 (689)
Income tax provision
(benefit).................. 234 (258) 104 99 17 (36)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Earnings (loss) from
continuing operations
before change in accounting
principle.................. 457 (501) 199 90 244 (653)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
(Loss) earnings from
discontinued operations.... (524) (986) (503) (690) (708) (1,464)
(Loss) earnings on disposal
of discontinued
operations................. 0 0 0 0 0 (248)
Income tax (benefit)
provision.................. (177) (348) (159) (457) (41) (90)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
(Loss) earnings on
discontinued operations.... (347) (638) (344) (233) (667) (1,622)
Cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle,
net of income tax
benefit.................... 0 0 0 0 (5,547) 0
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net earnings (loss).......... $ 110 $(1,139) $ (145) $ (143) $(5,970) $(2,275)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Earnings (loss) per share
from continuing operations
before change in accounting
principle.................. $ 0.07 $ (0.07) $ 0.03 $ 0.00 $ 0.03 $ (0.08)
(Loss) earnings per share
from discontinued
operations................. (0.05) (0.09) (0.05) (0.03) (0.09) (0.23)
Loss per share from change in
accounting principle....... 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.78) 0.00
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net earnings (loss) per
share...................... $ 0.02 $ (0.16) $ (0.02) $ (0.03) $ (0.84) $ (0.31)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Weighted average number of
common shares
outstanding................ 7,189 7,095 7,112 7,119 7,131 7,155
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
THREE MONTHS ENDED
----------------------------------------
JULY 3, SEPT. 30, JAN. 1, APRIL 1,
2003 2003 2004 2004
------- --------- ------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
REVENUES:
Merchandise sales.......... $36,223 $36,218 $36,262 $34,202
Gasoline sales............. 38,741 44,843 44,741 45,008
Other income............... 341 351 310 540
------- ------- ------- -------
Total revenues........... 75,305 81,412 81,313 79,750
Cost of sales................ 61,239 66,968 66,750 66,335
------- ------- ------- -------
Gross profit................. 14,066 14,444 14,563 13,415
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Selling.................... 9,995 10,146 10,022 10,131
General & administrative... 1,787 1,948 2,197 2,231
Depreciation &
amortization............. 1,149 1,067 1,082 1,079
Interest................... 824 949 889 869
------- ------- ------- -------
Earnings (loss) from
continuing operations
before income taxes and
change in accounting
principle.................. 311 334 373 (895)
Income tax provision
(benefit).................. 60 (35) 1 1
------- ------- ------- -------
Earnings (loss) from
continuing operations
before change in accounting
principle.................. 251 369 372 (896)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
(Loss) earnings from
discontinued operations.... (685) 546 337 (456)
(Loss) earnings on disposal
of discontinued
operations................. (472) 0 -- 0
Income tax (benefit)
provision.................. 21 22 0 0
------- ------- ------- -------
(Loss) earnings on
discontinued operations.... (1,178) 524 337 (456)
Cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle,
net of income tax
benefit.................... 0 0 0 0
------- ------- ------- -------
Net earnings (loss).......... $ (927) $ 893 $ 709 $(1,352)
======= ======= ======= =======
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Earnings (loss) per share
from continuing operations
before change in accounting
principle.................. $ 0.03 $ 0.05 $ 0.05 $ (0.13)
(Loss) earnings per share
from discontinued
operations................. (0.16) 0.07 0.05 (0.06)
Loss per share from change in
accounting principle....... 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------- ------- ------- -------
Net earnings (loss) per
share...................... $ (0.13) $ 0.12 $ 0.10 $ (0.19)
======= ======= ======= =======
Weighted average number of
common shares
outstanding................ 7,186 7,191 7,196 7,204
======= ======= ======= =======
67
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Most of Uni-Marts' sales are for cash and its inventory turns over rapidly.
From time to time, Uni-Marts utilizes portions of its cash to acquire and
construct new stores and renovate existing locations.
As of April 1, 2003, Uni-Marts amended its revolving credit agreement (the
"Agreement") to extend the maturity date to December 31, 2004 and revise
covenants relating to interest and fixed-charge coverage ratios. As part of the
amendment to the Agreement, at April 30, 2004 the total credit line available
for borrowings was reduced to $12.0 million, reflecting not only the elimination
of the seasonal borrowing increase of $2.0 million, but also an additional $1.0
million reduction in anticipation of reduced borrowing requirements that would
result from store divestitures expected to be completed by that time. As of
September 30, 2003, Uni-Marts entered into an agreement with its revolving
credit lender to provide a $4.0 million sub-limit under its existing revolving
credit agreement as discussed in Footnotes D and E to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for the second fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2004. At April
1, 2004, $5.8 million was available for borrowing under this Agreement for
general working capital and prepayment of debt. In addition, Uni-Marts' liquid
fuels tax bond expired in the third fiscal quarter of 2003. Due to the
expiration of the bond, Uni-Marts pays the liquid fuels tax on purchases
directly to the vendors within its normal payment terms. Uni-Marts utilizes its
working capital credit facility to mitigate the cash flow impact of the liquid
fuels tax bond expiration.
Capital requirements for debt service and capital leases for the remainder
of fiscal year 2004 are approximately $39.2 million, which includes $32.7
million related to Uni-Marts' divestiture plan and $5.7 million in revolving
credit that have been classified as current. Uni-Marts anticipates capital
expenditures for the remainder of fiscal year 2004 of $1.1 million, funded from
cash flows from operations. These capital expenditures include normal
replacement of store equipment and gasoline-dispensing equipment and upgrading
of Uni-Marts' in-store and corporate data processing systems.
Management believes that cash from operations, available credit facilities
and asset sales will be sufficient to meet Uni-Marts' obligations for the
foreseeable future. In the event that the proposed merger with Green Valley is
not consummated and Uni-Marts is otherwise unable to consummate the divestiture
of certain store locations on acceptable terms, there is a risk that Uni-Marts
could encounter liquidity problems.
Assuming the current level of cash flow and available credit facilities,
Uni-Marts would be able to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations
without any asset sales. However, in the event that Uni-Marts' future financial
performance does not meet minimum lender targets, covenant violations may result
and cause the restriction, modifications or loss of the current revolving credit
facility. Uni-Marts would then need to amend the current credit facility, obtain
a new credit facility from another lender, or rely more heavily on asset sales
in order to maintain liquidity.
68
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Below is a summarized list of Uni-Marts' contractual obligations relating
to long-term debt, capitalized leases, noncancelable operating leases and
gasoline supply agreements at April 1, 2004 (in thousands):
TWO QUARTERS
ENDING
SEPT. 30,
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 THEREAFTER TOTAL
------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- --------
Contractual Obligations:
Long-term debt
(including
interest)............. $ 44,538 $ 4,451 $ 4,465 $ 4,480 $ 4,494 $ 29,710 $ 92,138
Capitalized leases
(including
interest)............. 66 31 31 31 21 0 180
Operating leases........ 2,863 4,646 3,530 3,356 2,298 5,977 22,670
Gasoline supply
agreements(1)......... 80,598 138,647 114,682 110,424 93,401 89,665 627,417
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$128,065 $147,775 $122,708 $118,291 $100,214 $125,352 $742,405
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
---------------
(1) Uni-Marts has agreements with four gasoline suppliers with terms ranging
from 6 to 15 years. These agreements obligate Uni-Marts to purchase
specified quantities of gasoline at market prices from the various suppliers
over the life of the contracts. On an annualized basis, the minimum required
purchases under these agreements total approximately 96.5 million gallons.
The estimated minimum purchase obligations reflected in the table above are
calculated based on the gallon purchase requirements remaining under the
contracts at a current market price of $1.67 per gallon. Although Uni-Marts
did not meet the minimum purchase requirements in fiscal year 2003,
Uni-Marts does not expect any material change to its obligations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The discussion and analysis of Uni-Marts' financial condition and results
of operations are based upon its condensed consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires Uni-Marts to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, Uni-Marts evaluates
its estimates, including those related to self-insured liabilities, impairment
of long-lived assets and income taxes. Uni-Marts bases its estimates on
historical experience, current and anticipated business conditions, the
condition of the financial markets, and various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under existing conditions. Actual results may differ
from these estimates.
Uni-Marts believes that the following critical accounting policies affect
its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its
consolidated financial statements:
Self-insurance liabilities -- Uni-Marts records estimates for self-insured
worker's compensation and general liability insurance coverage. Should a greater
amount of claims occur compared to what was estimated, or costs increase beyond
what was anticipated, reserves recorded may not be sufficient, and additional
expense may be recorded.
Impairment -- Uni-Marts evaluates long-lived assets, including stores, for
impairment quarterly, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the assets may not be recoverable. The impairment is measured by
calculating the estimated future cash flows expected to be generated by the
store, and comparing this amount to the carrying value of the store's assets.
Cash flows are calculated utilizing individual store forecasts and total company
projections for the remaining estimated lease lives of the stores being
analyzed. Should actual results differ from those forecasted and projected,
Uni-Marts may be subject to future impairment charges related to these
facilities.
69
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, Uni-Marts adopted Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") Nos. 142 and 144. SFAS No. 142
requires that assets with indefinite lives not be amortized but tested annually
for impairment and provides specific guidance for such testing. SFAS No. 144
provides additional guidance for impairment testing and determination of when an
asset is considered to be for sale. Uni-Marts completed its impairment test
during the second quarter of fiscal 2003 and the adoption of SFAS No. 142
resulted in the write-off of goodwill in the amount of approximately $5.9
million. Furthermore, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Uni-Marts reclassified
assets totaling $40.9 million as part of its divestiture plan to sell or sublet
130 stores as assets held for sale in the third quarter of fiscal year 2003. At
April 1, 2004 Uni-Marts had reclassified as assets held for sale $40.8 million
relating to 122 remaining stores that Uni-Marts plans to sell or sublet,
reclassified the related debt totaling $32.7 million as current maturities, and
classified the income and expense of such stores as discontinued operations.
During fiscal year 2003, Uni-Marts recognized a $654,000 loss relating to the
future disposal of certain locations.
Income taxes -- Uni-Marts currently has NOL's that can be utilized to
offset future income for federal and state tax purposes. These NOL's generate a
significant deferred tax asset. However, Uni-Marts has recorded a valuation
allowance against this deferred tax asset as it has determined that it is more
likely than not that it will not be able to fully utilize the NOL's. Should
Uni-Marts' assumptions regarding the utilization of these NOL's change, it may
reduce some or all of this valuation allowance, which would result in the
recording of an income tax benefit.
IMPACT OF INFLATION
Uni-Marts believes that inflation has not had a material effect on its
results of operations in recent years. Generally, increases in Uni-Marts' cost
of merchandise can be quickly reflected in higher prices of goods sold. However,
any upward movement of gasoline costs may have short-term negative effects on
profit margins, since Uni-Marts' ability to raise gasoline prices can be limited
due to competition from other self-service gasoline outlets. In addition,
fluctuation of gasoline prices can limit the ability of Uni-Marts to maintain
stable gross margins.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Uni-Marts uses its revolving credit facility and its mortgage and equipment
loans to finance a significant portion of its operations. These on-balance sheet
financial instruments, to the extent they provide for variable rates of
interest, expose Uni-Marts to interest rate risk resulting from changes in the
LIBOR or prime rate.
To the extent that Uni-Marts' financial instruments expose Uni-Marts to
interest rate risk, they are presented in the table below. The table presents
principal cash flows and related interest rates by year of maturity for
Uni-Marts' revolving credit facility, mortgage loans and equipment loans at
April 1, 2004.
The carrying amounts of cash and short-term debt approximate fair value.
Uni-Marts estimates the fair value of its long-term, fixed-rate debt generally
using discounted cash flow analysis based on Uni-Marts' current borrowing rates
for debt with similar maturities. Uni-Marts estimates the fair value of its
long-term, variable-rate debt based on carrying amounts plus unamortized loan
fees associated with the debt.
70
FAIR VALUE
TOTAL DUE AT APR. 1,
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 THEREAFTER AT MATURITY 2004
------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---------- ----------- ----------
INTEREST-RATE SENSITIVE
ASSETS:
----------------------------
Noninterest-bearing
checking accounts....... $ 2,326 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,326 $ 2,326
Interest-bearing checking
accounts................ $ 984 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 984 $ 984
Average interest rate..... 0.90% 0.90% --
------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- -------
Total................. $ 3,310 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,310 $ 3,310
Total average interest
rate............... 0.27% 0.27% --
INTEREST-RATE SENSITIVE
LIABILITIES:
----------------------------
Variable rate
borrowings.............. $22,114 $1,088 $1,144 $1,204 $1,265 $10,216 $37,031 $37,031
Average interest rate..... 4.82% 4.87% 4.87% 4.87% 4.87% 4.87% 4.86% --
Fixed-rate borrowings..... $17,102 $ 721 $ 798 $ 881 $ 973 $17,389 $37,864 $40,475
Average interest rate..... 9.34% 9.23% 9.23% 9.24% 9.24% 9.24% 9.25% --
------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- -------
Total................... $39,216 $1,809 $1,942 $2,085 $2,238 $27,605 $74,895 $77,506
Total average interest
rate.................. 7.11% 7.40% 7.45% 7.50% 7.56% 7.63% 7.44% --
BUSINESS OF GREEN VALLEY
Green Valley is a Pennsylvania limited liability company formed in January
2004. Green Valley was organized solely for the purpose of acquiring Uni-Marts
and will, after the merger, continue Uni-Marts' operations. As a result of the
merger, Uni-Marts' separate existence will cease and Green Valley shall succeed
to all of Uni-Marts' rights and obligations and will continue as the surviving
company. Green Valley has not conducted any significant activities other than
those incident to its formation, its execution of the merger agreement and the
related documents. Green Valley currently has no material assets or liabilities,
other than its $400,000 cash deposit to Uni-Marts, its other rights and
obligations under the merger agreement and the related documents and its rights
to capital contribution from its two members. Green Valley has not generated any
revenues or material expenses (other than those associated with the merger).
Set forth below is information regarding each of the principal beneficial
owners of Tri-Color and KOTA Holdings (which are, in turn, the sole members of
Green Valley), and the other Green Valley Managers, including name, telephone
number, business address at which such employment is conducted and the material
occupations and positions held by such persons during the past five years.
Unless otherwise indicated, the business address for each of the following
individuals is 477 East Beaver Avenue, State College, PA 16801-5690 and their
telephone number is (814) 234-6000.
- Henry D. Sahakian, a principal beneficial owner of Tri-Color and a Green
Valley Manager, is the founder of Uni-Marts and has served as Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer since Uni-Marts' inception. Mr.
Sahakian is the brother of Daniel D. Sahakian and the father-in-law of
Ara M. Kervandjian.
- Daniel D. Sahakian, a principal beneficial owner of Tri-Color, has served
as a Director of Uni-Marts since 1981. He also has served for the past 23
years as President and Chief Executive Officer of HFL Corporation, a
commercial real estate company. Mr. Sahakian served as President of Unico
Corporation from 1988 through 2002 when Unico merged with HFL
Corporation. Mr. Sahakian is the brother of Henry D. Sahakian.
- Ara M. Kervandjian, a principal beneficial owner of Tri-Color and a Green
Valley Manager, joined Uni-Marts in October 2001 as Executive Vice
President of Strategy and Corporate Development and became the President
of Uni-Marts in April 2003. From 2000 to 2001, he served as Senior Vice
President of Conestoga Enterprises, Inc., a regional telecommunications
firm based in
71
Birdsboro, Pennsylvania. From 1995 to 2000, he was President and Chief
Executive Officer of TeleBeam Incorporated, a telecommunications firm
located in State College, Pennsylvania. Mr. Kervandjian is the son-in-law
of Henry D. Sahakian.
- Alex Sahakian, a Green Valley Manager, has served as President of Tsunami
Communications, a telecommunications company located at 403 East Beaver
Avenue, State College, Pennsylvania, phone number (814) 238-3500, since
founding the company in January 2000. Mr. Sahakian is the son of Daniel
D. Sahakian. From 1998 to January 2000, Alex Sahakian served as Vice
President of Development for HFL Corporation.
- Raj J. Vakharia, a principal beneficial owner of KOTA Holdings and a
Green Valley Manager, is the Managing Member of Reliance Properties, LLC,
a real estate firm specializing in commercial and residential
development. Mr. Vakharia began his career in December 1977 at the
investment banking firm of Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette ("DLJ") in New
York City. While at DLJ, Mr. Vakharia was the Managing Director of the
firm's real estate division. In June 2000, Mr. Vakharia was named
Managing Director of real estate for the investment banking firm of
Credit Suisse First Boston upon its merger with DLJ. In January 2002, Mr.
Vakharia assumed the position of Assistant State Treasurer for the State
of New Jersey. Mr. Vakharia held this position until June 2003, after
which he formed Reliance Properties.
- Paul A. Levinsohn, Esq., a principal beneficial owner of KOTA Holdings
and a Green Valley Manager, is the Managing Member of Harrelson, LLC, a
firm specializing in commercial real estate development and corporate
acquisitions. From 1995 to 1997, he was a law clerk to Judge Anne E.
Thompson, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. From 1998
to 2000, Mr. Levinsohn was an attorney at the law firm of Wilentz,
Goldman, & Spitzer in Woodbridge, New Jersey. From 2000 to 2001, Mr.
Levinsohn served as the President of The Montrose Team, a commercial real
estate firm based in Old Bridge, New Jersey. In January 2002, Mr.
Levinsohn assumed the position of Counsel for the State of New Jersey.
Mr. Levinsohn held this position until January 2003, and he formed
Harrelson, LLC in March 2003.
- Jaime L. Broderick, a Green Valley Manager, is a member of Harrelson,
LLC, a firm specializing in commercial real estate development and
corporate acquisitions. From 1997 to 1999, Ms. Broderick was a paralegal
in the real estate department of the law firm of Sluka & Northgrave in
Jersey City, New Jersey. From February 1999 to August 2000, she served as
a Compliance Officer on the Bill Bradley for President campaign. In
September 2000, Ms. Broderick became Executive Assistant to Mr.
Levinsohn. Ms. Broderick held this position until March 2003, when she
joined Harrelson, LLC.
Each of the foregoing persons is a citizen of the United States of America.
During the past five years, none of the foregoing persons had been (i) convicted
in any criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar
misdemeanors), or (ii) a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding that
resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining such person from future
violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, securities laws or a
finding of any violation of such laws.
Set forth below is information regarding Tri-Color, HFL, KOTA Holdings and
KOTA Management (which are the entities through which the foregoing beneficial
owners will invest in Green Valley). The business address for Tri-Color and HFL
is 477 East Beaver Avenue, State College, PA 16801-5690 and their telephone
number is (814) 234-6000. The business address for KOTA Holdings and KOTA
Management is 51 Midwood Way, Colonia, NJ 07067, and their telephone number is
(732) 225-2710.
- Tri-Color is a Pennsylvania limited liability company. Tri-Color was
organized specifically for the purpose of investing in Green Valley.
Tri-Color has not carried on any activities to date other than those
incident to its formation.
- HFL is a Pennsylvania corporation. HFL is engaged in the business of real
estate investment.
72
- KOTA Holdings is a Delaware limited liability company. KOTA Holdings was
organized specifically for the purpose of investing in Green Valley. KOTA
Holdings has not carried on any activities to date other than those
incident to its formation.
- KOTA Management is a Delaware limited liability company. KOTA Management
was organized specifically for the purpose of investing in KOTA Holdings.
KOTA Management has not carried on any activities to date other than
those incident to its formation.
During the last five years, none of the foregoing entities has been (i)
convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar
misdemeanors), or (ii) a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or
administrative body of competent jurisdiction and as a result of such proceeding
was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining future
violations of, or prohibiting or mandating activities subject to, federal or
state securities laws or finding any violation with respect to such laws.
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDENDS ON COMMON STOCK
Uni-Marts' common stock, $.10 par value per share, is listed on the
American Stock Exchange under the symbol "UNI." The transfer agent and registrar
for shares of Uni-Marts' common stock is Mellon Investor Services LLC,
Ridgefield Park, New Jersey. As of April 30, 2004, Uni-Marts had 7,208,725
shares of common stock outstanding.
Set forth below is a table which shows the high and low sale prices as
reflected on the American Stock Exchange and dividends paid on common stock for
each quarter in the two most recent fiscal years.
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
------- ------- ------- -------
2004
------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Dividends per share.................................... $0.00 $0.00 n.a. n.a.
Price Range
High...................................................... $1.94 $3.00 n.a. n.a.
Low....................................................... $1.41 $1.40 n.a. n.a.
2003
------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Dividends per share.................................... $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Price Range
High...................................................... $1.50 $1.40 $2.26 $1.94
Low....................................................... $1.07 $0.98 $1.15 $1.36
2002
------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Dividends per share.................................... $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Price Range
High...................................................... $3.10 $3.20 $3.10 $2.64
Low....................................................... $1.90 $1.59 $2.40 $1.18
In April 1997, Uni-Marts' Board of Directors elected to suspend the
quarterly dividends on its common stock. There can be no assurance of future
dividends because they are dependent not only on future earnings, but also on
Uni-Marts' capital requirements, loan covenants and financial condition. Certain
of Uni-Marts' debt agreements contain covenants that restrict the payment of
dividends without the lender's prior consent or require the maintenance of
minimum net worth levels.
Uni-Marts has not made an underwritten public offering of its common stock
during the past three years.
73
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth, as of April 30, 2004, except as otherwise
noted, information with respect to the beneficial ownership of Uni-Marts' common
stock by (i) each person known by Uni-Marts to own 5% or more of the outstanding
shares of common stock, (ii) each of Uni-Marts' Directors and named executive
officers, (iii) all of Uni-Marts' Directors and executive officers as a group,
and (iv) each person deemed to be a controlling person of Green Valley. As of
such date, there were 7,208,725 shares of common stock outstanding.
ISSUED AND AGGREGATE BENEFICIAL
OUTSTANDING SHARES OPTION SHARES(1) OWNERSHIP(1)
NAME AND ADDRESS OF --------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------------
BENEFICIAL OWNER (2) SHARES % SHARES SHARES %
-------------------- --------- ------- ------ --------- -------
Affiliated Stockholders:
Henry D. Sahakian.................... 1,177,207(3) 16.3% 133,000 1,310,207(3)(9) 17.9%
Daniel D. Sahakian................... 1,428,483(4) 19.8% 35,000 1,463,483(4)(9) 20.2%
Ara M. Kervandjian................... 59,309(5) 0.8% 112,500 171,809(5)(9) 2.3%
Affiliated Stockholders as a group: 2,115,249(3)(4)(5) 29.3% 280,500 2,395,749(3)(4)(5)(9) 32.0%
Other Directors and Executive Officers:
Herbert C. Graves.................... 29,660(6) 0.4% 24,000 53,660(6) *
Stephen B. Krumholz.................. 16,335 0.2% 24,000 40,335 *
Jack G. Najarian..................... 13,715 0.2% 19,000 32,715 *
Frank R. Orloski, Sr................. 19,510 0.3% 15,000 34,510 *
Anthony S. Regensburg................ 13,715 0.2% 19,000 32,715 *
Gerold C. Shea....................... 17,160 0.2% 24,000 41,160 *
Stuart W. Sivak...................... 0(7) 0.0% 96,583 96,583(7) 1.3%
N. Gregory Petrick................... 130(8) 0.0% 73,500 73,630(8) 1.0%
Other Directors and Executive
Officers as a Group:............. 110,225(10) 1.5% 295,083 405,308(10) 5.4%
All Directors and Executive Officers as
a Group (11 persons)................. 2,225,474(11) 30.9% 575,583 2,801,057(11) 36.0%
Other Members of Green Valley Group:
Raj Vakharia......................... 160,560 2.2% -- 160,560(12)(13)(15) 2.2%
Paul Levinsohn....................... 160,560 2.2% -- 160,560(12)(13)(15) 2.2%
Alex Sahakian........................ 211,750 2.9% -- 211,750(13)(14) 2.9%
Jaime Broderick...................... 0 0.0% -- 0(13)(14) *
Green Valley, et al.................... 3,304,559 45.8% 280,500 3,585,059(9) 47.9%
477 E. Beaver Ave
State College, PA 16801-5690
Linda Ordoukhanian, et al.............. 838,468 11.6% -- 838,468(16) 11.6%
1580 Massachusetts Avenue, #6D,
Cambridge, MA 02138
HFL Corporation........................ 549,750 7.6% -- 549,750(17) 7.6%
477 East Beaver Avenue
State College, PA 16801-5690
Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc......... 398,000 5.5% -- 398,000(18) 5.5%
1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor
Santa Monica, CA 90401
---------------
* Indicates less than 1.0%.
(1) Includes options to purchase common stock granted pursuant to Uni-Marts'
Equity Compensation Plan and 1996 Equity Compensation Plan that are
exercisable on or before June 29, 2004 ("Option Shares"). Except as
otherwise noted, the beneficial owner has sole voting and dispositive
power.
(2) Except as otherwise noted, the address of each beneficial owner is: in care
of Uni-Marts at 477 East Beaver Avenue, State College, PA 16801.
(3) Includes 35,500 shares owned by Henry D. Sahakian's wife, 92,400 shares
owned jointly with his wife, 549,750 shares held by HFL Corporation, 5,000
shares held in his Individual Retirement
74
Account, and 5,000 shares held as custodian for his grandchildren. Excludes
1,921,846 shares beneficially owned by other members of the group referred to in
Note (9) and approximately 71,179 shares held in the Uni-Marts' 401(k) Plan as
of April 1, 2004.
(4) Includes 322,325 shares held by Daniel D. Sahakian's wife, 549,750 shares
held by HFL Corporation, 137,815 shares held as a trustee for two trusts,
and 6,050 shares held jointly with his wife. Excludes 1,841,076 shares
beneficially owned by other members of the group referred to in Note (9).
(5) Includes 26,711 shares held by Kervandjian Family Limited Partnership over
which Mr. Kervandjian and his wife share voting and dispositive power, and
25,798 shares owned jointly with his wife. Excludes 3,132,750 shares
beneficially owned by other members of the group referred to in Note (9).
(6) Includes 15,000 shares held by the Graves Family Partnership.
(7) Excludes approximately 3,681 shares held in the Uni-Marts' 401(k) Plan as
of April 1, 2004.
(8) Excludes 342,798 shares held in the Uni-Marts' 401(k) Plan as of April 1,
2004. Mr. Petrick is trustee of the 401(k) Plan and disclaims beneficial
ownership of all but approximately 6,273 shares held in the 401(k) Plan.
(9) According to a Schedule 13D filed on Feb. 5, 2004, as amended March 24,
2004, Green Valley, the Tri-Color Members (Henry D. Sahakian, Daniel D.
Sahakian, Ara M. Kervandjian, Alex D. Sahakian, Armen D. Sahakian,
Frederick I. Sahakian, Heddy L. Kervandjian, HFL Corporation, Lara
Sahakian, Ludmila Sahakian, and Seda Sahakian) and KOTA Management reported
having formed a "group" as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act, and that each of these individuals and KOTA Management had
granted a proxy to vote the shares of Uni-Marts' common stock over which
they have voting power in favor of the merger agreement. Consequently, both
the group and Green Valley may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of an
aggregate of 3,585,059 shares of Uni-Marts' common stock (including 280,500
Options Shares) beneficially owned by members of the group.
(10) Excludes 342,798 shares held in the Uni-Marts' 401(k) Plan.
(11) Excludes 342,798 shares held in the Uni-Marts' 401(k) Plan, and 1,189,310
shares beneficially owned by members of the group referred to in Note (9)
other than Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian or Kervandjian.
(12) The beneficial owner is a Green Valley Manager and a principal beneficial
owner of Green Valley.
(13) The address of the beneficial owner is: in care of Green Valley at 477 East
Beaver Avenue, State College, PA 16801.
(14) The beneficial owner is a Green Valley Manager.
(15) Includes 160,560 shares held by KOTA Management.
(16) According to Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13D filed on February 12, 2002,
(the most recent amendment) Armineh Ordoukhanian Petrossian, Elsa
Ordoukhanian, Linda Ordoukhanian and Nancy Ordoukhanian reported having
formed a "group" as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange
Act and that each of Armineh Ordoukhanian Petrossian, Elsa Ordoukhanian and
Nancy Ordoukhanian had granted a proxy to vote the shares of Uni-Marts'
common stock owned by them to Linda Ordoukhanian. By their terms, the
proxies expired on or about February 8, 2003. The reporting persons,
however, have not filed a further amendment to the Schedule 13D, so they
may continue to constitute a group. According to the most recent amendment,
the aggregate number of shares beneficially owned by the group and Linda
Ordoukhanian was 838,468 at December 31, 2001.
(17) Voting control of these shares has been delegated by the Board of HFL
Corporation to Daniel D. Sahakian. Investment control of these shares is
held by the Board of HFL. Messrs. Henry and Daniel Sahakian, Ara
Kervandjian, Armen D. Sahakian, Frederick I. Sahakian and Alex D. Sahakian
comprise the Board of Directors of HFL.
(18) Based on information contained in an amendment to Schedule 13G filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2004. Dimensional
Fund Advisors, Inc. is an investment adviser registered under Section 203
of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and may be deemed to be the
75
"beneficial owner" in the aggregate of 398,000 shares of Uni-Marts' common
stock as of December 31, 2003. Dimensional Fund Advisors, however,
disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.
RECENT PURCHASES
On March 4, 2004, HFL Corporation, a company controlled by Messrs. Henry
and Daniel Sahakian, purchased 30,010 shares of Uni-Marts' common stock from a
member of the Sahakian's family. The purchase price of each share was $2.25,
which is equal to the consideration to be paid upon consummation of the merger.
On March 19, 2004, HP Limited Partnership (an entity related to Jim
Haseotes, who is discussed under "SPECIAL FACTORS -- Background of the Merger")
and its affiliate, Pilgrim Farms Dairy, Inc., entered into an agreement pursuant
to which HP and its affiliates sold all of the shares of Uni-Marts' common stock
owned by them as of that date (401,400 shares) at a price of $2.25 per share to
HFL Corporation (240,840 shares) and KOTA Management (160,560 shares). This
transaction was initiated by the actions of HP Limited Partnership.
Mr. Henry Sahakian participates in Uni-Marts' 401(k) Plan. Pursuant to the
Plan, employee contributions are matched by Uni-Marts with shares of Uni-Marts'
common stock. During the period commencing April 1, 2004 through the date of
this proxy statement, Mr. Sahakian has accrued a benefit of $384.69 that will be
funded at June 30, 2004 by the issuance of shares of Uni-Marts' common stock at
a price per share equal to the closing price of Uni-Marts common stock on June
30, 2004. Other than Uni-Marts' matching contributions, employees, including Mr.
Sahakian, are not permitted to make or hold any investment in Uni-Marts' stock
through the Plan.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Between January 28, 2004 and January 30, 2004, three lawsuits were filed on
behalf of stockholders of Uni-Marts in Delaware Chancery Court against
Uni-Marts, the members of the Board of Directors and, in two actions, against
Green Valley, in connection with the proposed merger between Uni-Marts and Green
Valley. The three lawsuits have now been consolidated into one action.
The relevant complaint alleges that, among other things, Messrs. Henry and
Daniel Sahakian have a conflict of interest with respect to the merger, all
Uni-Marts' Directors have breached their fiduciary duties in approving and
structuring the merger, and the price to be paid to the stockholders is grossly
unfair and inadequate. The plaintiffs seek class action certification, an
injunction prohibiting Uni-Marts from completing the merger, rescission of the
merger if it is consummated or the award of recessionary damages, compensatory
damages, and an award of attorneys' fees and costs of the lawsuit.
The parties to the consolidated actions have reached an agreement in
principle to settle the actions, subject to the negotiation of a definitive
stipulation of settlement, due notice to Uni-Marts' current and former
stockholders who are members of the plaintiff class and approval by the Delaware
Court of Chancery. This agreement in principle is based on enhanced disclosures
regarding the merger, all of which are included in this proxy statement. The
Memorandum of Understanding also includes the defendants' agreement to pay the
plaintiffs' attorneys fees, costs and expenses up to $325,000, subject to
approval by the Delaware Court of Chancery.
Uni-Marts' management believes these suits are without merit, and, if the
settlement contemplated by the Memorandum of Understanding is not approved by
the Delaware Court of Chancery, intends to vigorously defend the litigation.
These or similar lawsuits may jeopardize the merger, since their existence could
result in the failure of one or more conditions precedent to Green Valley's
obligation to conclude the merger and thus permit Green Valley to terminate the
merger agreement and abandon the merger should it desire to do so.
76
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
The SEC requires Uni-Marts to "incorporate by reference" information into
this proxy statement, which means that Uni-Marts discloses important information
by referring stockholders to another document filed separately with the SEC. The
following documents are incorporated by reference in this proxy statement and
are deemed to be a part hereof:
- Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003;
- Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed on January 27,
2004;
- Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 1, 2004;
- Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2004;
- Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on February 4,
2004;
- Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2004; and
- Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2004.
OTHER AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Uni-Marts is subject to the informational filing requirements of the
Exchange Act and, in accordance therewith, is required to file periodic reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC relating to our business,
financial condition and other matters. Information as of particular dates
concerning Uni-Marts' Directors and officers, their remuneration, stock options
granted to them, the principal holders of Uni-Marts' common stock and any
material interest of such persons in transactions with Uni-Marts is required to
be disclosed in proxy statements distributed to our stockholders and filed with
the SEC. Such reports, proxy statements and other information, as well as the
Schedule 13E-3 referred to in the following paragraph should be available for
inspection at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 450 5th
Street, N.W., Room 1200, Washington, D.C. 20549 (File no. 001-11556). Copies of
such materials may also be obtained by mail, upon payment of the SEC's customary
fees, by writing to its principal office at 450 5th Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20549. Some of this information filed by Uni-Marts may also be accessed on
the Internet through the website of the SEC at www.sec.gov.
Because the merger is a "going-private" transaction, Uni-Marts, Green
Valley and the Affiliated Stockholders have filed with the SEC a Rule 13E-3
Transaction Statement on Schedule 13E-3 under the Exchange Act with respect to
the merger. This proxy statement does not contain all of the information set
forth in the Schedule 13E-3 and exhibits to the Schedule 13E-3, certain parts of
which are omitted, as permitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of
the SEC, including a copy of materials prepared by Boenning & Scattergood as to
the fairness of the consideration to be received in the merger, and filed as an
exhibit to the Schedule 13E-3. Descriptions contained herein concerning any
documents are not necessarily complete and, in each instance, reference is made
to the copy of such document filed as an exhibit to the Schedule 13E-3.
Except as otherwise required by law, neither Uni-Marts, Green Valley, nor
the Green Valley Managers have made any provision granting to Public
Stockholders access to the corporate files of any of the foregoing persons or to
obtain counsel or appraisal services at the expense of any of the foregoing
persons. Copies of the Schedule 13E-3 and the exhibits thereto are available for
inspection and copying at Uni-Marts' principal executive offices during regular
business hours by any of our interested stockholders, or a representative who
has been so designated in writing, and may be inspected and copied, or obtained
by mail, by written request directed to Uni-Marts.
If the merger is consummated, Uni-Marts will seek to cause the shares of
common stock to be de-listed from trading on the American Stock Exchange and to
terminate the registration of the common
77
stock under the Exchange Act, which will relieve Uni-Marts of any obligation to
file reports and forms, such as an Annual Report on Form 10-K, with the SEC
under the Exchange Act.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
The 2004 annual meeting of the stockholders of Uni-Marts will be held only
if the merger is not consummated. If the merger is not consummated, Uni-Marts
will schedule an annual meeting. The date of such meeting will be announced by
press release and filing of a Current Report on Form 8-K. Such announcement will
include appropriate information regarding procedures for stockholder proposals
for inclusion in Uni-Marts' proxy materials and the deadline for such
submissions. In addition, such announcement will also include appropriate
information regarding the deadline for notice to Uni-Marts by stockholders who
intend to present proposals at the annual meeting and not intending to have such
proposals included in the proxy statement.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors does not intend to bring before the special meeting
for action any matters other than those specifically referred to in this proxy
statement and is not aware of any other matters that are proposed to be
presented by others. If any other matters or motions should properly come before
the special meeting, the persons named in the proxy intend to vote thereon in
accordance with their judgment on such matters or motions, including any matters
or motions dealing with the conduct of the special meeting.
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any
representation with respect to the matters described in this proxy statement
other than those contained herein. Any information or representations with
respect to such matters not contained herein or therein must not be relied upon
as having been authorized by us. The delivery of this proxy statement shall not
under any circumstances create any implication that there has been no change in
our affairs since the date hereof or that the information in this proxy
statement is correct as of any time subsequent to the date hereof.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Mary Ann Miller
MARY ANN MILLER
Secretary
State College, Pennsylvania
June 9, 2004
78
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
----
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
FISCAL YEAR END 2003:
Independent Auditors' Report.............................. F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2003 and
2002................................................... F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001...................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the
years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001.......... F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001...................... F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-7
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED):
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 1, 2004
and September 30, 2003................................. F-24
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
quarters ended April 1, 2004 and April 3, 2003......... F-26
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
quarters ended April 1, 2004 and April 3, 2003......... F-27
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements...... F-29
F-1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Uni-Marts, Inc.
State College, Pennsylvania
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Uni-Marts,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2003. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Uni-Marts, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note A to the consolidated financial statements, in fiscal
year 2003 the Company changed its method of accounting for intangible and other
assets to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 16, 2003
F-2
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
SEPTEMBER 30,
--------------------
2003 2002
-------- --------
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash...................................................... $ 6,619 $ 6,501
Accounts receivable -- less allowances of $100 and $46.... 6,186 8,404
Inventories............................................... 20,167 20,779
Prepaid and current deferred taxes........................ 57 1,494
Property and equipment held for sale...................... 41,024 1,098
Prepaid expenses and other................................ 1,317 1,137
-------- --------
Total Current Assets.............................. 75,370 39,413
Net Property, Equipment and Improvements.................... 51,083 98,037
Loan Due from Officer....................................... 0 360
Intangible Assets........................................... 385 6,235
Other Assets................................................ 1,123 1,100
-------- --------
Total Assets...................................... $127,961 $145,145
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable.......................................... $ 19,056 $ 17,811
Gas taxes payable......................................... 45 3,460
Accrued expenses.......................................... 7,425 7,207
Revolving credit.......................................... 5,705 5,867
Current maturities of long-term debt...................... 36,934 3,212
Current obligations under capital leases.................. 122 113
-------- --------
Total Current Liabilities......................... 69,287 37,670
Long-Term Debt, less current maturities..................... 34,358 71,912
Obligations Under Capital Leases, less current maturities... 92 214
Deferred Taxes.............................................. 0 1,797
Deferred Revenue and Other Liabilities...................... 4,101 5,235
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 a share:
Authorized 100,000 shares;
issued none.......................................... 0 0
Common Stock, par value $.10 a share:
Authorized 16,000,000 shares;
issued 7,453,883 and 7,420,859 shares,
respectively........................................ 745 742
Additional paid-in capital................................ 23,709 23,803
Retained (deficit) earnings............................... (2,618) 5,661
-------- --------
21,836 30,206
Less treasury stock, at cost -- 258,110 and 291,429 shares
of Common Stock, respectively.......................... (1,713) (1,889)
-------- --------
Total Stockholders' Equity........................ 20,123 28,317
-------- --------
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity........ $127,961 $145,145
======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-3
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
-------- -------- --------
REVENUES:
Merchandise sales......................................... $140,471 $143,315 $130,341
Gasoline sales............................................ 154,076 117,007 143,257
Other income.............................................. 1,445 1,658 1,676
-------- -------- --------
295,992 261,980 275,274
-------- -------- --------
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales............................................. 239,767 205,300 216,953
Selling................................................... 40,363 39,811 39,931
General and administrative................................ 7,621 8,026 7,264
Depreciation and amortization............................. 4,435 4,709 4,884
Interest.................................................. 3,589 3,710 4,548
Provision for asset impairment............................ 0 0 54
-------- -------- --------
295,775 261,556 273,634
-------- -------- --------
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and
change in accounting principle............................ 217 424 1,640
Income tax provision........................................ 6 179 651
-------- -------- --------
Earnings from continuing operations before change in
accounting principle...................................... 211 245 989
Discontinued operations:
Loss from discontinued operations......................... (2,311) (2,703) (892)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations............... (720) 0 0
Income tax benefit........................................ (88) (1,141) (354)
-------- -------- --------
Loss from discontinued operations........................... (2,943) (1,562) (538)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of
income tax benefit of $310................................ (5,547) 0 0
-------- -------- --------
Net (loss) earnings......................................... $ (8,279) $ (1,317) $ 451
======== ======== ========
Earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings per share from continuing operations before
change in accounting principle......................... $ 0.03 $ 0.03 $ 0.14
Loss per share from discontinued operations............... (0.41) (0.22) (0.08)
Loss per share from change in accounting principle........ (0.78) 0.00 0.00
-------- -------- --------
Net (loss) earnings per share............................... $ (1.16) $ (0.19) $ 0.06
======== ======== ========
Diluted (loss) earnings per share........................... $ (1.16) $ (0.19) $ 0.06
======== ======== ========
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding........ 7,165 7,099 7,053
======== ======== ========
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
assuming dilution......................................... 7,165 7,099 7,093
======== ======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-4
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
COMMON STOCK
AUTHORIZED 16,000,000
SHARES ADDITIONAL RETAINED TREASURY STOCK
---------------------- PAID-IN (DEFICIT) -----------------
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS SHARES AMOUNT TOTAL
----------- -------- ---------- --------- ------- ------- -------
BALANCE -- OCTOBER 1, 2000..... 7,361,123 $736 $23,816 $ 6,527 333,714 $(2,111) $28,968
Issuance of common stock..... 26,960 3 17 (10,439) 54 74
Net earnings................. 451 451
--------- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
BALANCE -- SEPTEMBER 30,
2001......................... 7,388,083 739 23,833 6,978 323,275 (2,057) 29,493
Issuance of common stock..... 32,776 3 (30) (31,846) 168 141
Net loss..................... (1,317) (1,317)
--------- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
BALANCE -- SEPTEMBER 30,
2002......................... 7,420,859 742 23,803 5,661 291,429 (1,889) 28,317
Issuance of common stock..... 33,024 3 (94) (33,319) 176 85
Net loss..................... (8,279) (8,279)
--------- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
BALANCE -- SEPTEMBER 30,
2003......................... 7,453,883 $745 $23,709 $(2,618) 258,110 $(1,713) $20,123
========= ==== ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-5
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Cash received from customers and others................... $ 296,999 $ 262,871 $ 271,407
Cash paid to suppliers and employees...................... (289,100) (252,920) (271,213)
Dividends and interest received........................... 30 45 77
Interest paid (net of capitalized interest of $0, $287 and
$32).................................................... (3,193) (3,620) (4,278)
Income taxes received (paid).............................. 32 21 (152)
Other receipts -- discontinued operations................. 203 845 4,682
--------- --------- ---------
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities............ 4,971 7,242 523
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Receipts from sale of capital assets...................... 29 559 394
Receipts from sale of discontinued operations............. 1,530 0 0
Purchase of property, equipment and improvements.......... (2,137) (2,868) (10,402)
Note receivable from officer.............................. 360 60 60
Cash advanced for intangible and other assets............. (305) (177) (207)
Cash received for intangible and other assets............. 30 69 66
--------- --------- ---------
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities................ (493) (2,357) (10,089)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
(Payments) borrowings on revolving credit agreement....... (162) 109 4,615
Additional long-term borrowings........................... 0 0 5,197
Principal payments on debt................................ (4,201) (3,599) (3,065)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock.................... 3 31 12
--------- --------- ---------
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing
Activities......................................... (4,360) (3,459) 6,759
--------- --------- ---------
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash............................. 118 1,426 (2,807)
Cash at Beginning of Year................................... 6,501 5,075 7,882
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at End of Year......................................... $ 6,619 $ 6,501 $ 5,075
========= ========= =========
RECONCILIATION OF NET (LOSS) EARNINGS TO NET CASH PROVIDED
BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (Loss) Earnings......................................... $ (8,279) $ (1,317) $ 451
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit
of $88, $1,141 and $354, respectively..................... (2,223) (1,562) (538)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations................. (720) 0 0
--------- --------- ---------
(Loss) Earnings from Continuing Operations.................. (5,336) 245 989
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET (LOSS) EARNINGS TO NET CASH
PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Depreciation and amortization........................... 4,435 4,709 4,884
Loss on sale of capital assets and other................ 518 354 405
Provision for asset impairment.......................... 0 0 54
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle..... 5,547 0 0
Change in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable................................ 2,138 (1,046) (1,050)
Inventories........................................ 692 (2,388) (2,235)
Prepaid expenses and other......................... (178) 2,248 (2,334)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.............. (1,951) 2,058 (2,201)
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities........ (1,184) (924) (707)
--------- --------- ---------
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Continuing Operations...... 4,681 5,256 (2,195)
--------- --------- ---------
Net Cash Provided by Discontinued Operations.............. 290 1,986 2,718
--------- --------- ---------
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities................... $ 4,971 $ 7,242 $ 523
========= ========= =========
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-6
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003, 2002 AND 2001
A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
The Company is an independent operator of convenience stores and discount
tobacco stores located in Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, Maryland and
Virginia.
(1) Principles of Consolidation -- The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Uni-Marts, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries (the "Company"). All material intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
(2) Reclassifications -- Certain prior year balances have been classified
to conform to the current year presentation.
(3) Future Operations -- The Company continues to evaluate existing stores
based on their historical contribution. The Company will consider
closing underperforming stores or investing in facility upgrades to
enhance their performance. The Company retained financial advisors in
fiscal year 2002 to evaluate operating strategies which included the
potential divestiture of certain store locations and non-operating
assets. As a result of its analysis with its financial advisors, the
Company intends to continue with its divestiture strategy.
Management believes that cash from operations, available credit
facilities and asset sales will be sufficient to meet the Company's
obligations for the foreseeable future. In the event that the Company
is unable to consummate its divestiture strategy, there is a risk that
the Company will not be able to meet future cash obligations.
(4) Inventories -- The Company values its merchandise inventories at the
lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market, as determined by
the retail inventory method. Gasoline inventories are valued at the
lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market (See Footnote B).
(5) Property, Equipment and Improvements -- Depreciation and amortization
are calculated using the straight-line method over the useful lives of
the related assets. Amortization of improvements to leased properties
is based on the remaining terms of the leases or the estimated useful
lives of such improvements, whichever is shorter. Interest costs
incurred on borrowed funds during the period of construction of
capital assets are capitalized as a component of the cost of acquiring
those assets.
(6) Asset Impairment -- Long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles are reviewed for impairment quarterly, or whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is assessed based on the
future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its
eventual disposition. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows is
less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is
recognized. Any impairment loss, if indicated, is measured as the
amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated
fair value of the asset.
(7) Self-Insurance Reserves -- The Company assumes the risks for general
liability and workers' compensation insurance exposures up to certain
loss thresholds set forth in separate insurance contracts. The Company
has established self-insurance reserves for these risks, which are
recorded on a present value basis using a risk-free discount rate of
5.0% in 2003 and 2002, respectively, using actuarial valuations
provided by an independent company. At September 30, 2003 and 2002,
the Company had self-insurance reserves totaling $3,083,400 and
$2,800,800, respectively. These reserves are included in accrued
expenses in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
F-7
(8) Income Taxes -- The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and
liabilities for temporary differences between the financial statement
and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates
adjusted for valuation allowances.
(9) Earnings Per Share -- Earnings per share are calculated based on the
weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted
earnings per share were calculated in fiscal year 2001. Although there
were potentially dilutive stock options for 1,161,333 and 1,219,833
shares outstanding in fiscal years 2003 and 2002, respectively, they
were not included as the effect would have been anti-dilutive because
the exercise price exceeded the market price.
(10) Revenue Recognition -- The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of
merchandise and gasoline at the time it is sold. Return activity is
immaterial to revenues and operations in all periods presented.
(11) Vendor Rebates and Allowances -- Rebates and allowances from vendors
that are dependent on purchases are initially deferred (See Footnote
I) and recognized as a reduction of cost of goods sold when related
inventory is sold. Rebates not tied directly to purchases are
recognized as reduction of selling, general and administrative
expenses when earned.
(12) Advertising Costs -- The Company expenses advertising costs in the
period in which they are incurred. The Company incurred advertising
costs of $309,000, $783,200 and $841,800 in fiscal years 2003, 2002
and 2001, respectively, of which $110,900, $280,200 and $285,900, in
fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, related to stores
included in discontinued operations and was reclassified accordingly.
(13) Estimates -- The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from
those estimates and assumptions.
(14) Segment Disclosures -- The Company has only one reportable segment.
(15) Recent Accounting Pronouncements -- In June 2001, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets," which requires that such assets with
indefinite lives not be amortized but be tested annually for
impairment and provides specific guidance for such testing. If the
carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value an impairment loss
must be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. Once an
impairment is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of goodwill
will be its new basis of accounting. This statement also requires
disclosure of information regarding goodwill and other assets that was
previously not required. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company
has discontinued the amortization of goodwill as of October 1, 2002
and completed its impairment test, using a discounted cash flow
approach, during the 2003 second fiscal quarter. As a result, the
Company wrote-off its total goodwill balance of $5,857,000. (See
Footnote E)
The Company adopted SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations," effective for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003.
Under the statement's provisions, (1) entities must record the fair
value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in
which it is incurred, (2) when the liability is initially recorded, the
entity must capitalize a cost by increasing the carrying amount of the
related long-lived asset, (3) over time, the liability is accreted to
its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated
over the useful life of the related asset and (4) upon settlement of the
liability, the entity either settles the obligation for its recorded
amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. There was no material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of
operations as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 143.
F-8
The Company adopted SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," effective October 1, 2002. SFAS No. 144
addressed the financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or
disposal of long-lived assets. The Company recognized a $654,000 loss on
disposal of certain locations in fiscal year 2003.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4,
44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections," effective October 1, 2002. SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No.
4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," and an
amendment of that Statement, and SFAS No. 64, "Accounting for Leases,"
to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for
sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain
lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to
sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS No. 145 also amends other existing
authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections,
clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed
conditions. There was no impact on the Company's consolidated financial
position or results of operations as a result of the adoption of SFAS
No. 145.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities," effective January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 146
requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal
activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a
commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Previous accounting guidance was
provided by Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 94-3, "Liability
Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to
Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring),"
which required that a liability for costs associated with an exit plan
or disposal activity be recognized at the date of an entity's commitment
to an exit plan. There was no impact on the Company's consolidated
financial position or results of operations as a result of the adoption
of SFAS No. 146.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation -- Transition and Disclosure -- an Amendment of
FASB Statement No. 123." SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation," to provide alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No.
148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require
prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements
about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and
the effect of the method used on reported results. The disclosure
requirements apply to all companies for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2002. The interim disclosure provisions are effective for
financial reports containing financial statements for interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 148 had an
impact on the Company's disclosure requirements, but had no impact on
the Company's consolidated financial statements.
The Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based
compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting
Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees", and related interpretations for all periods represented.
Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the
excess, if any, of the fair value of the Company's common stock at the
date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the
stock. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net
loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS
F-9
No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", to stock-based
employee compensation (in thousands, except per share data):
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
-------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------- --------- -------
Net (loss) earnings, as reported......................... $(8,279) $(1,317) $ 451
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all
awards, net of related tax effects..................... (17) (115) (10)
------- ------- -----
Pro forma net (loss) earnings............................ $(8,296) $(1,432) $ 441
======= ======= =====
Basic and diluted net (loss) earnings per share as
reported............................................... $ (1.16) $ (0.19) $0.06
======= ======= =====
Pro forma basic and diluted net (loss) earnings per
share.................................................. $ (1.16) $ (0.20) $0.06
======= ======= =====
In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 02-16,
"Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a
Vendor." Issue 02-16 provides guidance on when to classify consideration
received from a vendor as a reduction of the price of the vendor's
products, a reimbursement of costs incurred or as revenue. In addition,
Issue 02-16 provides guidance on when to recognize rebates or refunds of
a specified amount of cash consideration from a vendor that are based on
the achievement of a specified cumulative level of purchases or are
based on the customer purchasing from the vendor for a specified period
of time. The guidance in Issue 02-16 has been adopted by the Company in
the second quarter of fiscal year 2003 and there was no impact on the
Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In November of 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN
45"), "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees
Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." FIN 45
requires entities to establish liabilities for certain types of
guarantees, and expands financial statement disclosures for others. The
accounting requirements of FIN 45 are effective for guarantees issued or
modified after December 31, 2002, and the disclosure requirements are
effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending
after December 15, 2002. There was no impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position or results of operations as a result of
the adoption of FIN 45.
The FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 applies immediately to variable
interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and to variable
interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that
date. For variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003, it
becomes applicable for the first annual period beginning after June 15,
2003.
In October 2003, the FASB (the "Board") deferred the effective date for
applying the provisions of FIN 46 to the first interim or annual period
ending after December 15, 2003 for interests held by public companies in
variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities
created before February 1, 2003. The Board considered comments received
on the Exposure Draft of the proposed modifications of FIN 46 and, on
December 10, 2003, the Board redeliberated certain proposed
modifications. Based on management's assessment as of the date of this
report, management has determined that adoption of FIN 46 has not had an
impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement No.
133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This Statement
amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts. This Statement clarifies under what circumstances a contract
with an initial net investment meets the characteristic of a derivative,
clarifies when a derivative
F-10
contains a financing component, amends the definition of an underlying
to conform it to language used in FASB Interpretation FIN 45, and amends
certain other existing pronouncements. SFAS No. 149 is effective for
contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging
relationships designated after June 30, 2003. All provisions of the
Statement, except those related to forward purchases or sales of
"when-issued" securities, should be applied prospectively. The Company
currently has no instruments that meet the definition of a derivative,
and therefore, the adoption of this Statement has had no impact on the
Company's financial position or results of operations.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equity." This Statement establishes standards for the classification and
measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of
both liabilities and equity. This Statement is effective for financial
instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise
effective for most provisions, except certain mandatorily redeemable
non-controlling interests deferred indefinitely, at the beginning of the
first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company has not
entered into or modified any financial instruments after May 31, 2003.
The adoption of this Statement has had no impact on the Company's
financial position or results of operations.
B. INVENTORIES:
The following is a summary of inventories at September 30 (in thousands):
2003 2002
------- -------
Merchandise................................................. $15,953 $17,688
Gasoline.................................................... 4,214 3,091
------- -------
$20,167 $20,779
======= =======
C. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT HELD FOR SALE:
Property and equipment held for sale is carried at the lower of cost or net
realizable value and are classified as current assets because the Company
expects them to be sold within the next fiscal year. The properties are the
assets of the stores classified as discontinued operations, undeveloped land,
rental properties, store equipment and closed convenience stores. In accordance
with the Company's plan to pursue a divestiture strategy, the Company plans to
sell or sublet assets of 130 stores. At September 30, 2003, the Company had 128
remaining stores classified as discontinued operations on its balance sheet with
a net book value of $41.0 million.
F-11
D. PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS -- AT COST (IN THOUSANDS):
ESTIMATED
ACCUMULATED NET BOOK LIFE IN
COST DEPRECIATION VALUE YEARS
-------- ------------ -------- ---------
SEPTEMBER 30, 2003:
Land............................................... $ 13,304 $ 0 $13,304
Buildings.......................................... 41,495 15,099 26,396 29-35
Machinery and equipment............................ 26,131 18,131 8,000 3-10
Machinery and equipment............................ 4,154 2,554 1,600 11-20
Capitalized property and equipment leases.......... 296 185 111 5-20
Leasehold improvements............................. 7,100 5,438 1,662 1-10
Leasehold improvements............................. 404 394 10 11-20
-------- ------- -------
$ 92,884 $41,801 $51,083
======== ======= =======
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002:
Land............................................... $ 22,629 $ 0 $22,629
Buildings.......................................... 74,610 22,247 52,363 29-35
Machinery and equipment............................ 45,184 28,040 17,144 3-10
Machinery and equipment............................ 6,902 4,117 2,785 11-20
Capitalized property and equipment leases.......... 1,141 742 399 5-25
Leasehold improvements............................. 11,352 8,661 2,691 1-10
Leasehold improvements............................. 433 407 26 11-20
-------- ------- -------
$162,251 $64,214 $98,037
======== ======= =======
Depreciation expense (including the amortization of capitalized property
and equipment leases) in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $6,880,700,
$7,795,300 and $7,677,100, respectively, of which $2,438,300, $3,302,900 and
$3,024,100 in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, related to stores
included in discontinued operations and was reclassified accordingly.
F-12
E. INTANGIBLE AND OTHER ASSETS:
Intangible and other assets consist of the following (in thousands):
ACCUMULATED NET BOOK USEFUL
COST AMORTIZATION VALUE LIVES
------- ------------ -------- ------
SEPTEMBER 30, 2003:
Goodwill.............................................. $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Lease acquisition cost................................ 298 249 49 12-25
Noncompete agreements................................. 250 171 79 5
Other intangibles..................................... 272 15 257 15-16
------- ------ ------
Total intangibles................................... 820 435 385
Other assets.......................................... 1,123 0 1,123
------- ------ ------
$ 1,943 $ 435 $1,508
======= ====== ======
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002:
Goodwill.............................................. $ 8,874 $3,017 $5,857 13-40
Lease acquisition cost................................ 315 251 64 12-25
Noncompete agreements................................. 250 121 129 5
Other intangibles..................................... 197 12 185 15-16
------- ------ ------
Total intangibles................................... 9,636 3,401 6,235
Other assets.......................................... 1,100 0 1,100
------- ------ ------
$10,736 $3,401 $7,335
======= ====== ======
Goodwill represented the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets
acquired in business combinations. The Company completed an impairment analysis
during the second fiscal quarter of fiscal year 2003 in connection with the
adoption of SFAS No. 142, resulting in a write-off of goodwill in the amount of
$5.8 million. Lease acquisition costs are the bargain element of acquired leases
and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the related lease terms.
Amortization expense was $67,400 (2003), $461,800 (2002) and $462,600 (2001) of
which $27,600 (2003), $195,500 (2002) and $199,000 (2001) related to stores
included in discontinued operations and was reclassified accordingly.
Amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
September 30,
2004................................................... $290
2005................................................... 70
2006................................................... 9
2007................................................... 6
2008................................................... 4
Thereafter............................................. 6
----
$385
====
The Company's adoption of SFAS No. 142 eliminates the requirement to
amortize goodwill beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 (see Footnote
A -- "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies -- Recent Accounting
Pronouncements"). Goodwill amortization in fiscal years 2002 and 2001 was
$388,600, or $0.05 per share, and $388,600, or $0.06 per share, respectively.
The following table adjusts net earnings
F-13
(loss) and net earnings (loss) per share for the adoption of SFAS No. 142 (in
thousands, except per share data):
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------- --------- -------
Reported net (loss) earnings............................ $(8,279) $(1,317) $ 451
Add back:
Goodwill amortization................................. 0 389 389
------- ------- -----
Adjusted net (loss) earnings............................ $(8,279) $ (928) $ 840
======= ======= =====
Net (loss) earnings per share........................... $ (1.16) $ (0.19) $0.06
======= ======= =====
Adjusted net (loss) earnings per share.................. $ (1.16) $ (0.14) $0.12
======= ======= =====
F. REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT:
On April 20, 2000, the Company executed a 3-year secured $10.0 million
revolving loan agreement (the "Agreement") with $3.5 million available for
letters of credit. Provisions of the Agreement require the maintenance of
certain covenants relating to minimum tangible net worth, interest and
fixed-charge coverage ratios, as measured on a quarterly basis. In addition, the
Agreement places limitations on capital expenditures, additional debt and
payment of dividends. During fiscal years 2001 and 2002, the Agreement was
amended to increase the total credit line, extend the maturity date, revise
covenants relating to fixed charge coverage ratios, and provide for additional
borrowing on a seasonal basis. At September 30, 2003, the total credit line
available for borrowings was $15.0 million, with $3.5 million available for
letters of credit and $4.0 million available for the prepayment of debt in
connection with the sale of stores (as discussed below and in Footnote G).
Effective April 1, 2003, the Company amended the Agreement to extend the
maturity date to December 31, 2004, extend the $2.0 million seasonal borrowing
increase to April 30, 2004, and revise certain financial covenants. The Company
was in compliance with these covenants as of September 30, 2003. Borrowings of
$5.7 million and letters of credit of $3.5 million were outstanding under the
Agreement at September 30, 2003. This facility bears interest at the Company's
option based on a rate of either prime plus 1.0% or LIBOR plus 3.0%. The blended
interest rate at September 30, 2003 was 4.27%. The Agreement is collateralized
by substantially all of the Company's inventories, receivables, other personal
property and selected real properties. At September 30, 2003, the net book value
of these selected real properties that are pledged as collateral was $2.4
million. As discussed more fully in Footnote G, in connection with the
negotiation of Master Property Disposition Agreements relating to certain of the
Company's term loans, as of September 30, 2003, the Company entered into an
agreement with its revolving credit lender to provide a $4.0 million sub-limit
under the revolving credit agreement. This sub-limit may be utilized under
certain conditions to pay off term debt associated with stores that are sold.
These agreements create a subordinated interest in the several cross-escrow
accounts created pursuant to the Master Property Disposition Agreements and
continue the lien on working capital assets and certain real property assets
created by the original revolving credit agreement. At September 30, 2003, $5.8
million (including the $2.0 million seasonal borrowing increase that expires on
April 30, 2004) was available under the Agreement for general working capital
purposes and prepayment of debt.
F-14
G. LONG-TERM DEBT:
SEPTEMBER 30,
-----------------
2003 2002
------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Mortgage Loan. Principal and interest will be paid in 180
remaining monthly installments. At September 30, 2003, the
coupon rate was 9.08% and the effective interest rate was
9.77%, net of unamortized fees of $1,054,786 ($1,204,119
in 2002).................................................. $29,949 $31,568
Mortgage Loan. Principal and interest will be paid in 200
remaining monthly installments. The loan bears interest at
LIBOR plus 3.75%. At September 30, 2003, the coupon rate
was 4.86% and the effective interest rate was 5.54%, net
of unamortized fees of $322,559 ($364,952 in 2002)........ 19,702 20,423
Mortgage Loan. Principal and interest will be paid in 201
remaining monthly installments. At September 30, 2003, the
coupon rate was 10.39% and the effective interest rate was
10.71%, net of unamortized fees of $104,665 ($114,683 in
2002)..................................................... 6,366 6,502
Mortgage Loans. Principal and interest are paid in monthly
installments. The loans expire in 2009, 2010, 2020 and
2021. Interest ranges from the prime rate to LIBOR plus
3.75%. At September 30, 2003, the blended coupon rate was
5.86% and the effective interest rate was 6.48%, net of
unamortized fees of $137,563 ($144,626 in 2002)........... 6,909 7,202
Revolving Credit Agreement. Interest is paid monthly. The
interest rate at September 30, 2003 was 4.27%. (See
Footnote F)............................................... 5,705 5,867
Equipment Loans. Principal and interest will be paid in
monthly installments. The loans expire in 2010 and 2011
and bear interest at LIBOR plus 3.75%. At September 30,
2003, the blended coupon rate was 4.86% and the effective
interest rate was 5.65%, net of unamortized fees of
$91,716 ($135,213 in 2002)................................ 7,616 8,506
Equipment Loan. Principal and interest will be paid in 80
remaining monthly installments. The loan expires in 2010.
At September 30, 2003, the coupon rate was 10.73% and the
effective interest rate was 11.16%, net of unamortized
fees of $9,450 ($13,776 in 2002).......................... 750 923
------- -------
76,997 80,991
Less current maturities..................................... 42,639 9,079
------- -------
$34,358 $71,912
======= =======
The mortgage loans are collateralized by $65,531,000 of property, at net
book value, of which $25,721,600 relates to stores classified as discontinued
operations. The equipment loans are collateralized by $4,345,100 of equipment,
at net book value, of which $2,362,000 relates to stores classified as
discontinued operations.
The Company has classified $34.4 million as current maturities relating to
its divestiture plan. However, $33.5 million becomes due only when sales of
store locations classified as discontinued operations are consummated and the
remaining $0.9 million are regularly scheduled payments.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt (net of loan fee amortization) during the
next five years are as follows (in thousands):
September 30,
2004................................................... $42,639
2005................................................... 1,836
2006................................................... 1,972
2007................................................... 2,113
2008................................................... 2,270
Thereafter............................................. 26,167
-------
$76,997
=======
F-15
In April and September 2000, the Company, through special purpose
consolidated entities with GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation, (formerly
Franchise Finance Corporation of America), ("FFCA") completed 20-year mortgage
loans totaling $32.5 million and 10-year equipment loans totaling $11.0 million
to finance the purchase of assets from Orloski Service Station, Inc. ("OSSI").
In fiscal year 2001, the Company completed a 20-year mortgage loan totaling $3.5
million and a 10-year equipment loan to finance the construction of one
additional store location with FFCA.
As of September 30, 2003, the Company entered into several Master Property
Disposition Agreements that amended, through October 31, 2004, certain terms of
the various loan agreements originated with and now serviced by FFCA. Under
these agreements the lenders will permit the disposition and release of their
security interest on certain real property and equipment assets that are part of
the Company's strategic disposition program. In addition, the lenders will
accept reduced prepayment penalties or yield maintenance payments, and forbear
from enforcing any property fixed charge ratio covenants, corporate fixed charge
ratio covenants, or net worth covenants for the duration of the agreements. The
agreements also establish several cross-escrow accounts, create liens against
these accounts, and continue the liens on certain real property and equipment
assets that were part of the original loan. Simultaneously, the Company entered
into an agreement with its revolving credit lender to provide a $4.0 million
sub-limit under its existing revolving credit agreement. (See Footnote F)
H. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The carrying amounts of cash and short-term debt approximates fair value.
The Company estimates the fair value of its long-term, fixed-rate debt generally
using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company's current borrowing
rates for debt with similar maturities. The Company estimates the fair value of
its long-term, variable-rate debt based on carrying rates offered for similar
security, terms and maturity.
Fair value of capital lease obligations is estimated based on current rates
offered to the Company for similar debt.
The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instrument liabilities
are as follows (in thousands):
SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
------------------ ------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- ------- -------- -------
Long-term debt:
Current maturities........................... $42,639 $42,639 $ 9,079 $ 9,079
Long-term debt............................... $34,358 $36,937 $71,912 $74,002
Obligations under capital leases:
Current maturities........................... $ 122 $ 122 $ 113 $ 113
Long-term debt............................... $ 92 $ 101 $ 214 $ 228
F-16
I. DEFERRED REVENUE AND OTHER LIABILITIES:
The Company generally records revenues when products are sold or services
rendered. In certain instances, the Company receives advance payments for
purchase commitments or other services and records revenue from such payments in
accordance with the terms of the related contractual arrangements.
Deferred revenue and other liabilities includes the following (in
thousands):
SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------
2003 2002
------ ------
Deferred revenue............................................ $4,011 $5,170
Other non-current liabilities............................... 90 65
------ ------
$4,101 $5,235
====== ======
J. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
During fiscal year 2003, the Company announced plans to divest 130 stores
and reclassified the assets relating to these stores as discontinued operations
in accordance with the adoption of SFAS 144 and reclassified the related debt of
$34.4 million as current maturities. At September 30, 2003, the Company had 128
remaining stores classified as property held for sale on its balance sheet with
a net book value of $41.0 million. The income and expense relating to these
stores is reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the
accompanying financial statements and are reported separately from the results
of continuing operations. In addition, the Company recognized a $66,000 loss
from the sale of five stores and one non-operating location during fiscal year
2003 and a $654,000 loss relating to the future disposal of certain locations.
The Company cannot be certain that sales of assets will occur at the time or for
the values that the Company estimates. The Company intends continue to operate
these stores pending successful negotiation of their sale or sub-lease.
The following is a summary of the operating results and net loss of
discontinued operations (in thousands, except per share data):
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues............................................. $162,487 $149,884 $146,993
Loss from discontinued operations.................... $ (2,311) $ (2,703) $ (892)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations.......... (720) 0 0
Income tax benefit................................... (88) (1,141) (354)
-------- -------- --------
Net loss from discontinued operations................ $ (2,943) $ (1,562) $ (538)
======== ======== ========
Loss per share from discontinued operations.......... $ (0.41) $ (0.22) $ (0.08)
======== ======== ========
K. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
(1) Leases -- The Company leases its corporate headquarters, 124 of its
store locations and certain equipment. Future minimum lease payments
under capital leases and noncancellable operating leases with initial
or remaining terms in excess of one year at September 30, 2003 are
shown below. Some of the leases provide for additional rentals when
sales exceed a specified amount and contain variable renewal options
and escalation clauses. Rental income in connection with the leases of
certain properties is also provided. Such rental income was $819,600
(2003), $849,900 (2002) and $876,300 (2001) of which $198,900 (2003),
$212,800 (2002) and $214,500
F-17
(2001) related to stores included in discontinued operations and was
reclassified accordingly (in thousands):
CAPITAL OPERATING RENTAL
LEASES LEASES INCOME
------- --------- ------
2004...................................................... $ 140 $ 6,012 $ 751
2005...................................................... 31 4,757 612
2006...................................................... 31 3,506 440
2007...................................................... 31 3,331 372
2008...................................................... 21 2,274 303
Thereafter................................................ 0 5,967 226
----- ------- ------
Total future minimum lease payments............. 254 $25,847 $2,704
======= ======
Less amount representing interest......................... (40)
-----
Present value of future payments.......................... 214
Less current maturities................................... (122)
-----
$ 92
=====
Rental expense under operating leases was as follows (in thousands):
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------
2003 2002 2001
------ ------ ------
Minimum rentals........................................... $7,298 $7,099 $5,287
Contingent rentals........................................ 103 92 39
------ ------ ------
$7,401 $7,191 $5,326
====== ====== ======
The table above includes rental expense for stores classified as
discontinued operations of $1,208,300 (2003), $1,211,100 (2002) and $1,140,700
(2001) and was reclassified accordingly.
(2) Change of Control Agreements -- The Company has change of control
agreements with its four executive officers pursuant to which each
executive officer will receive remuneration of 2.99 times his base
compensation if his employment is terminated due to a change of control
as defined in the agreements. Remuneration which might be payable under
these agreements has not been accrued in the consolidated financial
statements as a change of control has not occurred.
(3) Gasoline Supply Agreements -- Pursuant to agreements with four gasoline
suppliers, with terms of 6-15 years, the Company receives from the
suppliers partial funding of the cost of the above-ground gasoline
equipment and rebates for the purchase of gasoline. As of September 30,
2003, the total funding subject to these arrangements is $7,115,900. If
the Company terminates these agreements before the expiration of the
contract terms, part of this funding, in addition to the funding
previously made to OSSI, must be repaid to the suppliers. The
expiration dates range from 2006 to 2013.
(4) Litigation -- The Company is involved in litigation and other legal
matters which have arisen in the normal course of business. Although
the ultimate results of these matters are not currently determinable,
management does not expect that they will have a material adverse
effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
L. CHANGES IN SECURITIES:
During fiscal year 2003, the Uni-Marts, Inc. Retirement Savings and
Incentive Plan purchased 33,319 shares of the Company's treasury stock for
$175,816 to fund its 401(k) retirement plan, resulting in a
F-18
decrease of additional paid-in capital of $133,460. Also during fiscal year
2003, the Company issued 31,000 shares of common stock to its non-employee
directors, as part of their annual retainer, issued 500 shares of its common
stock upon exercise of a stock option, and issued 1,524 shares of common stock
to the Company's employee stock purchase plan. The issuance of these shares
resulted in an increase of $39,417 to additional paid-in capital. The net effect
of these transactions in fiscal year 2003 was a decrease to additional paid-in
capital of $94,043.
ADDITIONAL
PAID IN
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL
------- --------- ----------
FISCAL YEAR 2003:
Sale of treasury stock.............................. (33,319) $(175,816) $(133,460)
Shares issued to directors.......................... 31,000 39,990 36,890
Employee stock purchase plan........................ 1,524 2,042 1,890
Exercise of stock options........................... 500 687 637
------- --------- ---------
(295) $(133,097) $ (94,043)
======= ========= =========
FISCAL YEAR 2002:
Sale of treasury stock.............................. (31,846) $(168,487) $ (98,704)
Shares issued to directors.......................... 15,680 39,984 38,416
Employee stock purchase plan........................ 6,763 15,059 14,382
Exercise of stock options........................... 10,333 16,500 15,467
------- --------- ---------
930 $ (96,944) $ (30,439)
======= ========= =========
M. INCOME TAXES:
The provision for income taxes includes the following (in thousands):
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
--------------------------
2003 2002 2001
------- ------- ------
Current tax expense (credit):
Federal................................................... $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
State..................................................... 4 6 2
----- ----- ----
4 6 2
----- ----- ----
Deferred tax expense (credit):
Federal................................................... (720) (632) 388
State..................................................... 324 (336) (93)
----- ----- ----
(396) (968) 295
----- ----- ----
$(392) $(962) $297
===== ===== ====
F-19
Deferred tax liabilities (assets) are comprised of the following at
September 30 (in thousands):
2003 2002 2001
------- ------- -------
Depreciation............................................ $ 6,265 $ 7,174 $ 7,361
------- ------- -------
Gross deferred tax liabilities.......................... 6,265 7,174 7,361
------- ------- -------
Insurance reserves...................................... (1,246) (1,132) (1,100)
Intangible assets....................................... (990) 0 0
Capital leases.......................................... 50 7 60
Deferred compensation................................... 0 0 (33)
Deferred income......................................... (651) (1,119) (1,078)
Net operating loss carryforward......................... (4,324) (4,249) (3,440)
Other................................................... (349) (332) (450)
------- ------- -------
Gross deferred tax assets............................... (7,510) (6,825) (6,041)
Less valuation allowance................................ 1,245 48 45
------- ------- -------
Net deferred tax assets................................. (6,265) (6,777) (5,996)
------- ------- -------
$ 0 $ 397 $ 1,365
======= ======= =======
The financial statements include noncurrent deferred tax liabilities of $0
(2003) and $1,796,900 (2002) and current deferred tax assets of $0 (2003) and
$1,400,300 (2002) which are included in prepaid and current deferred taxes.
The valuation allowances as of September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001, were
$1,245,000, $48,000 and $45,000, respectively, and principally apply to NOL and
tax credit carryforwards. The Company believes that it is more likely than not
that those carryforwards will not be realized.
As of September 30, 2003, the Company had available state and federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $11,233,300 which expire in fiscal years 2018
through 2023.
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to an amount determined
by application of the statutory federal income tax rate follows (in thousands):
YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------
2003 2002 2001
------- ----- ----
Statutory rate.............................................. $(2,948) $(775) $254
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Valuation allowance.................................... 1,245 0 0
Goodwill............................................... 1,087 67 66
State taxes (net)...................................... 216 (218) (60)
Tax credits............................................ 0 (38) 45
Other (net)............................................ 8 2 (8)
------- ----- ----
Tax (benefit) provision..................................... $ (392) $(962) $297
======= ===== ====
N. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
During fiscal year 1997, the Company granted a loan of $800,000 to an
officer of the Company. In January 1999, the interest rate on the loan was
changed to the brokerage call rate plus 0.5% (4.0% at September 30, 2002). The
loan required payments of $60,000 plus interest on November 1, 1999, 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003 and a final payment of $300,000 on November 1, 2004. The loan was
collateralized by
F-20
303,397 shares of the Company's Common Stock. The balance of the loan was repaid
in full during the third quarter of fiscal year 2003.
Certain directors and officers of the Company are also directors, officers
or controlling shareholders of other entities from which the Company leases its
corporate headquarters and various store and other locations under agreements
classified as operating leases. In addition, the Company leases store locations
from entities controlled by, or from persons related to, certain directors and
officers of the Company. The following is a summary of significant transactions
with these entities:
(1) The Company leases its corporate headquarters and various store and
other locations under agreements classified as operating leases.
Aggregate rentals in connection with all such leases were $1,491,000
(2003), $1,255,500 (2002), and $698,800 (2001).
(2) The Company charges an affiliate for general and administrative
services provided. Such charges amounted to $11,200 (2003), $11,200
(2002), and $11,200 (2001).
During fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company made payments of $0,
$79,300 and $79,200, respectively, to a director of the Company for consulting
fees and reimbursement of expenses.
O. RETIREMENT SAVINGS AND INCENTIVE PLAN:
The Company has a contributory retirement savings plan covering all
employees meeting minimum age and service requirements. The Company will match
one-half of employee contributions up to 3% of the employee's compensation. The
Company's contributions are invested in the Company's Common Stock. The Board of
Directors may elect to make additional contributions to be allocated among all
eligible employees in accordance with provisions of the plan. The retirement
savings plan expense, which is funded currently, was $87,500 (2003), $98,400
(2002) and $108,300 (2001).
P. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN:
The Company had a nonqualified deferred compensation plan which was
terminated in January 2002 and the assets distributed to the beneficiaries. The
deferred compensation plan permitted key executives to elect annually (via
individual contracts) to defer a portion of their compensation until their
retirement, death or disability. The Company made a 50% matching contribution
not exceeding $5,000 annually per executive. The deferred compensation expense
was $0, $13,200, and $16,200 for the years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and
2001, respectively.
Q. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS:
The Company has an Equity Compensation Plan, pursuant to which no
additional stock options may be granted, and a 1996 Equity Compensation Plan,
which became effective November 1, 1996. The Company has reserved 38,250 shares
of common stock which can be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options
in accordance with the terms of the Equity Compensation Plan and 1,633,637
shares of common stock which can be issued upon exercise of outstanding options
or options that may be granted in the future in accordance with the terms of the
1996 Equity Compensation Plan.
Both the Equity Compensation Plan and the 1996 Equity Compensation Plan are
collectively discussed as the "Plans" below.
A committee of the Board of Directors has authority to administer the
Plans, and the committee may grant qualified and nonqualified incentive stock
options to employees of the Company, including officers, whether or not they are
directors. The Plans also provide that all nonemployee directors will receive
annual nonqualified stock option grants for 2,000 shares of common stock plus
500 shares for each full year the director has served as a member of the board,
up to a maximum of 4,000 shares per grant, on the date of each annual meeting.
These options generally have a vesting period of one year. In addition, newly
appointed or elected nonemployee directors receive an initial grant for 5,000
shares. Nonemployee directors will also receive grants of stock equal in value
to and in lieu of two-thirds of the retainer due to such
F-21
director. The Company granted options to purchase 31,500, 30,000 and 32,500
shares of common stock to nonemployee directors under the Plans during fiscal
years 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The Company also issued 31,000, 15,680
and 19,850 shares of common stock to nonemployee directors during fiscal years
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, as part of their annual retainer.
The exercise price of all options granted under the Plans may not be less
than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, and the
maximum allowable term of each option is ten years. For qualified stock options
granted to any person who holds more than 10% of the voting power of the
outstanding stock, the exercise price may not be less than 110% of the fair
market value, and the maximum allowable term is five years. Options granted
under the Plans generally have vesting periods of up to three years.
Information regarding outstanding options is presented below. All options
outstanding are exercisable according to their vesting schedule.
Outstanding Options for Shares of Common Stock (in thousands, except per
share data) are as follows:
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
WEIGHTED AVERAGE REMAINING
OUTSTANDING EXERCISE EXERCISE PRICE CONTRACTUAL
OPTIONS PRICE PER SHARE PER SHARE LIFE
----------- --------------- ---------------- ----------------
Balance, September 30, 2000......... 728 $1.13 to $8.50 $4.36
Granted............................. 258 $1.81 to $2.42 $2.21
Canceled............................ (41) $2.00 to $7.70 $4.33
-----
Balance, September 30, 2001......... 945 $1.13 to $8.50 $2.81
Granted............................. 494 $1.40 to $2.55 $1.72
Exercised........................... (10) $1.38 to $2.00 $1.60
Canceled............................ (209) $1.38 to $7.00 $3.70
-----
Balance, September 30, 2002......... 1,220 $1.13 to $8.50
Granted............................. 32 $1.29 $1.29
Exercised........................... (1) $1.38 $1.38
Canceled............................ (90) $1.29 to $7.00 $2.54
-----
Balance, September 30, 2003......... 1,161
=====
1,093 $1.13 to $3.75 $1.94 7.1 years
40 $3.76 to $6.13 $5.37 2.2 years
28 $6.14 to $8.50 $6.90 2.5 years
-----
1,161 $1.13 to $8.50 $2.18 6.8 years
=====
Exercisable at September 30, 2003... 850 $1.13 to $8.50 $2.34
=====
Balance of Shares Reserved for Grant
at September 30, 2003............. 511
=====
The weighted average fair value of the stock options granted during fiscal
years 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $0.91, $1.21 and $1.84, respectively. The fair
value of each stock option granted is estimated on the
F-22
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions used for grants in the years ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands):
2003 2002 2001
----- ----- -----
Risk-free interest rate..................................... 3.9% 3.6% 4.6%
Expected volatility......................................... 62.8% 62.3% 86.0%
Expected life in years...................................... 9.0 9.0 9.0
Contractual life in years................................... 10.0 10.0 10.0
Fair value of options granted............................... $ 29 $ 599 $ 475
R. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN:
In February 1999, the Company's stockholders approved a stock purchase
plan. Under the stock purchase plan, eligible employees may purchase common
stock in quarterly offering periods through payroll deductions of up to 25% of
compensation. The price per share is 90% of the average market price throughout
the quarter but not less than 90% of the lower of the market price at the
beginning or end of the market period. The stock purchase plan provides for
purchases by employees of up to an aggregate of 500,000 shares. Effective
January 1, 2003 the employee stock purchase plan was frozen and the shares held
by the plan were distributed to the participants. During fiscal years 2003, 2002
and 2001, employees purchased 1,524, 6,763, and 7,110 shares, respectively,
pursuant to the stock purchase plan.
F-23
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
APRIL 1, SEPTEMBER 30,
2004 2003
-------- -------------
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash...................................................... $ 3,310 $ 6,619
Accounts receivable -- less allowances of $121 and $100,
respectively........................................... 4,323 6,186
Inventories............................................... 17,978 20,167
Prepaid and current deferred taxes........................ 52 57
Property and equipment held for sale...................... 40,770 41,024
Prepaid expenses and other................................ 1,081 1,317
-------- --------
Total current assets................................... 67,514 75,370
Net property, equipment and improvements.................... 49,463 51,083
Net intangible assets....................................... 214 385
Other assets................................................ 1,097 1,123
-------- --------
Total assets........................................... $118,288 $127,961
======== ========
F-24
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)
(CONTINUED)
APRIL 1, SEPTEMBER 30,
2004 2003
-------- -------------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable.......................................... $ 12,001 $ 19,101
Accrued expenses.......................................... 8,341 7,425
Revolving credit agreement................................ 5,687 5,705
Current maturities of long-term debt...................... 35,395 36,934
Current obligations under capital leases.................. 67 122
-------- --------
Total current liabilities............................ 61,491 69,287
Long-term debt, less current maturities..................... 33,813 34,358
Obligations under capital leases, less current maturities... 83 92
Deferred revenue and other liabilities...................... 3,397 4,101
Commitments and contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share:
Authorized 100,000 shares; issued none................. 0 0
Common Stock, par value $.10 per share:
Authorized 16,000,000 shares; issued 7,456,633 and
7,453,883 shares, respectively........................ 746 745
Additional paid-in capital................................ 23,677 23,709
Retained deficit.......................................... (3,260) (2,618)
-------- --------
21,163 21,836
Less treasury stock, at cost -- 247,908 and 258,110 shares
of Common Stock, respectively.......................... (1,659) (1,713)
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity........................... 19,504 20,123
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity........... $118,288 $127,961
======== ========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
F-25
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)
QUARTER ENDED TWO QUARTERS ENDED
------------------- -------------------
APRIL 1, APRIL 3, APRIL 1, APRIL 3,
2004 2003 2004 2003
-------- -------- -------- --------
REVENUES:
Merchandise sales.................................... $34,202 $33,091 $70,464 $68,890
Gasoline sales....................................... 45,008 34,772 89,749 69,631
Other income......................................... 540 336 851 754
------- ------- ------- -------
79,750 68,199 161,064 139,275
------- ------- ------- -------
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales........................................ 66,335 55,000 133,085 111,555
Selling.............................................. 10,131 9,981 20,153 20,207
General and administrative........................... 2,231 1,985 4,428 3,886
Depreciation and amortization........................ 1,079 1,113 2,161 2,226
Interest............................................. 869 895 1,759 1,816
------- ------- ------- -------
80,645 68,974 161,586 139,690
------- ------- ------- -------
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and
change in accounting principle....................... (895) (775) (522) (415)
Income tax provision (benefit)......................... 1 (42) 2 (23)
------- ------- ------- -------
Loss from continuing operations before change in
accounting principle................................. (896) (733) (524) (392)
Discontinued Operations:
Loss from discontinued operations.................... (456) (1,378) (118) (2,185)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations.......... 0 (248) 0 (248)
Income tax benefit................................... 0 (84) 0 (128)
------- ------- ------- -------
Loss on discontinued operations........................ (456) (1,542) (118) (2,305)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle,
net of income tax benefit of $310.................... 0 0 0 (5,547)
------- ------- ------- -------
Net loss............................................... $(1,352) $(2,275) $ (642) $(8,244)
======= ======= ======= =======
Loss Per Share:
Loss per share from continuing operations before
change in accounting principle.................... $ (0.13) $ (0.10) $ (0.07) $ (0.05)
Loss per share from discontinued operations.......... (0.06) (0.22) (0.02) (0.32)
Loss per share from change in accounting principle... 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.78)
------- ------- ------- -------
Basic and diluted net loss per share................... $ (0.19) $ (0.32) $ (0.09) $ (1.15)
======= ======= ======= =======
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common
shares outstanding................................... 7,204 7,155 7,200 7,143
======= ======= ======= =======
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
F-26
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
TWO QUARTERS ENDED
---------------------
APRIL 1, APRIL 3,
2004 2003
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Cash received from customers and others................... $ 162,087 $ 140,792
Cash paid to suppliers and employees...................... (161,461) (138,417)
Dividends and interest received........................... 9 16
Interest paid............................................. (1,473) (1,931)
Income taxes received (paid).............................. 3 (5)
Other receipts-discontinued operations.................... (32) (525)
--------- ---------
Net cash used in operating activities.................. (867) (70)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Receipts from sale of capital assets...................... 203 27
Receipts from sale of discontinued operations............. 491 1,135
Purchase of property, equipment and improvements.......... (908) (796)
Cash advanced for intangible and other assets............. 0 (75)
Cash received for intangible and other assets............. 48 13
--------- ---------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities.... (166) 304
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings on revolving credit agreement.................. (18) (58)
Principal payments on debt................................ (2,262) (2,701)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock.................... 4 2
--------- ---------
Net cash used in financing activities.................. (2,276) (2,757)
--------- ---------
Net decrease in cash........................................ (3,309) (2,523)
Cash at beginning of period................................. 6,619 6,501
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period....................................... $ 3,310 $ 3,978
========= =========
F-27
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
(CONTINUED)
TWO QUARTERS ENDED
---------------------
APRIL 1, APRIL 3,
2004 2003
-------- --------
RECONCILIATION OF NET LOSS TO NET CASH USED IN OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
Net loss.................................................... $ (642) $(8,244)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit
of $0 and $128............................................ (118) (2,305)
------- -------
Loss from continuing operations............................. (524) (5,939)
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
TO NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Depreciation and amortization............................. 2,161 2,226
Loss on sale of capital and other assets.................. 123 261
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle....... 0 5,547
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable.................................. 1,863 2,109
Inventories.......................................... 2,189 3,491
Prepaid and other expenses........................... 237 406
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses................ (6,185) (7,028)
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities.......... (699) (746)
------- -------
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations........ (835) 327
------- -------
Net cash used in discontinued operations.................... (32) (397)
------- -------
Net cash used in operating activities....................... $ (867) $ (70)
======= =======
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
F-28
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
A. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of April 1, 2004, the condensed
consolidated statements of operations and the condensed consolidated statements
of cash flows for the quarter and two quarters ended April 1, 2004 and April 3,
2003, respectively, have been prepared by Uni-Marts, Inc. (the "Company")
without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only
normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position
of the Company at April 1, 2004 and the results of operations and cash flows for
all periods presented have been made.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested
that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2003. Certain reclassifications have been made to the
September 30, 2003 financial statements to conform to classifications used in
fiscal year 2004. The results of operations for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for the full year.
During fiscal 2003, the Company increased its valuation allowance against
the deferred tax asset because it has been determined that it is more likely
than not that the Company will not be able to utilize the net operating loss
carryforwards ("NOL's"). The increase in the allowance has resulted in a minimum
tax provision in the first two quarters of fiscal 2004.
As part of the Company's plan to divest of stores, in fiscal 2003, the
Company reclassified the assets of 130 stores on its balance sheet as properties
held for sale and classified the income and expense of such stores as
discontinued operations. At April 1, 2004, the Company had 122 remaining stores
classified as assets held for sale on its balance sheet with a net book value of
$40.8 million. The Company continues to operate the stores pending their
successful negotiation of sale or sublease, although pursuant to the merger
agreement with Green Valley Acquisition Co., LLC ("Green Valley") described
below, the Company may not sell or lease a material portion of its assets
without the consent of Green Valley. At April 1, 2004, the Company had 163
stores classified as continuing operations.
B. FUTURE OPERATIONS:
During fiscal year 2002, the Company began a store evaluation and strategic
initiative program, with the retention of financial advisors, to evaluate
operating strategies including the divestiture of certain store locations and
non-operating assets. As a result of this evaluation, during the last twelve
months, the Company closed three convenience stores and sold two convenience
stores, four Choice Cigarette Discount Outlets ("Choice") and two non-operating
locations. In addition, the Company's negotiations with certain buyers to divest
additional store locations led the Board of Directors to consider the sale of
the entire Company when certain potential third party buyers expressed an
interest in acquiring the Company. In fiscal 2003, the Board established an Ad
Hoc Committee, consisting solely of independent directors, that conducted all
negotiations relating to the sale of the Company. The Ad Hoc Committee was
advised separately by independent counsel and financial advisors.
During fiscal 2003, negotiations with certain potential third party buyers
and, subsequently, HFL Corporation, an entity controlled by Henry and Daniel
Sahakian (the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and a Director,
respectively), did not come to fruition for a variety of reasons. In the first
quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company's negotiations with another potential third
party buyer were not successfully concluded. In December 2003, the Company
agreed to consider a proposal for the acquisition of the Company by an entity
owned in part by Henry Sahakian, Daniel Sahakian and Ara Kervandjian
F-29
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(the Company's President). On January 26, 2004, the Company entered into a
definitive merger agreement with Green Valley, a privately held company formed
for the purpose of acquiring the Company. The business and affairs of Green
Valley are to be managed under the direction of a Board of Managers, which
currently consists of six individuals, three of whom have been appointed by an
entity controlled by Henry Sahakian, Daniel Sahakian and Ara Kervandjian, and
three of whom have been appointed by an entity controlled by individuals who are
not affiliated with the Company. Consummation of the merger is subject to
various conditions, including shareholder approval, and is expected to be
completed in June 2004.
Management believes that cash from operations, available credit facilities
and asset sales will be sufficient to meet the Company's obligations for the
foreseeable future. In the event that the proposed merger with Green Valley is
not consummated and the Company is otherwise unable to consummate the
divestiture of certain store locations on acceptable terms, there is a risk that
the Company could encounter liquidity problems.
The current level of cash flow and available credit facilities allows the
amount of asset sales that are necessary to maintain sufficient liquidity to
meet its obligations to be minimal. However, in the event that the Company's
future financial performance does not meet minimum lender targets, covenant
violations might result and cause the restriction, modification or loss of the
current revolving credit facility. The Company would then need to amend the
current credit facility, obtain a new credit facility from another lender or
rely more heavily on asset sales in order to maintain liquidity.
C. INTANGIBLE AND OTHER ASSETS:
Intangible and other assets consist of the following (in thousands):
APRIL 1, SEPTEMBER 30,
2004 2003
-------- -------------
Lease acquisition costs..................................... $ 270 $ 298
Noncompete agreements....................................... 250 250
Other intangibles........................................... 133 272
------ ------
653 820
Less accumulated amortization............................... 439 435
------ ------
214 385
Other assets................................................ 1,097 1,123
------ ------
$1,311 $1,508
====== ======
Lease acquisition costs are the bargain element of acquired leases and are
being amortized on a straight-line basis over the related lease terms.
Amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 TOTAL
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -----
Lease acquisition costs....................... $ 5 $14 $9 $9 $5 $ 42
Non compete agreements........................ 25 29 0 0 0 54
Other intangibles............................. 113 5 0 0 0 118
---- --- -- -- -- ----
$143 $48 $9 $9 $5 $214
==== === == == == ====
F-30
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
D. REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT:
On April 20, 2000, the Company executed a 3-year secured $10.0 million
revolving loan agreement (the "Agreement") with $3.5 million available for
letters of credit. Provisions of the Agreement require the maintenance of
certain covenants relating to minimum tangible net worth, interest and
fixed-charge coverage ratios, as measured on a quarterly basis. In addition, the
Agreement places limitations on capital expenditures, additional debt and
payment of dividends. This Agreement bears interest at the Company's option
based on a rate of either prime plus 1.0% or LIBOR plus 3.0%. The blended
interest rate at April 1, 2004 was 4.45%. The Agreement is collateralized by
substantially all of the Company's inventories, receivables, other personal
property and selected real properties. At April 1, 2004, the net book value of
these selected real properties that are pledged as collateral was $2.4 million.
The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of April 1, 2004.
Borrowings of $5.7 million and letters of credit of $3.5 million were
outstanding under the Agreement at April 1, 2004.
During fiscal years 2001 and 2002, the Agreement was amended to increase
the total credit line, extend the maturity date, revise covenants relating to
fixed charge and interest coverage ratios, and provide for additional borrowing
on a seasonal basis. At April 1, 2004, the total credit line available for
borrowings was $15.0 million, with $3.5 million available for letters of credit
and $4.0 million available for the prepayment of debt in connection with the
sale of stores (as discussed below and in Footnote E). Effective April 1, 2003,
the Company amended the Agreement to extend the maturity date to December 31,
2004, extend the $2.0 million seasonal borrowing increase to April 30, 2004, and
revise certain financial covenants. As part of this amendment to the Agreement,
at April 30, 2004 the total credit line available for borrowings was reduced to
$12.0 million, reflecting not only the elimination of the seasonal borrowing
increase but also an additional $1.0 million reduction in anticipation of
reduced borrowing requirements that would result from store divestitures
expected to be completed by that time.
As discussed in Footnote E, in connection with the negotiation of Master
Property Disposition Agreements relating to certain of the Company's term loans,
as of September 30, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with its
revolving credit lender to provide a $4.0 million sub-limit under the revolving
credit agreement. This sub-limit may be utilized under certain conditions to pay
off term debt associated with stores that are sold. These agreements create a
subordinated interest in the several cross-escrow accounts created pursuant to
the Master Property Disposition Agreements and continue the lien on working
capital assets and certain real property assets created by the original
revolving credit agreement. At April 1, 2004, $5.8 million (including the $2.0
million seasonal borrowing increase that expires on April 30, 2004 and the $1.0
million additional reduction required by the April 1, 2003 amendment) was
available under the Agreement for general working capital purposes and
prepayment of debt.
E. LONG-TERM DEBT:
APRIL 1, SEPTEMBER 30,
2004 2003
-------- -------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Mortgage Loan. Principal and interest will be paid in 173
remaining monthly installments. At April 1, 2004, the
coupon rate was 9.08% and the effective interest rate was
9.81%, net of unamortized fees of $997,610 ($1,054,786 in
2003)..................................................... $29,330 $29,949
Mortgage Loan. Principal and interest will be paid in 193
remaining monthly installments. The loan bears interest at
LIBOR plus 3.75%. At April 1, 2004, the coupon rate was
4.84% and the effective interest rate was 5.19%, net of
unamortized fees of $298,094 ($322,559 in 2003)........... 19,324 19,702
F-31
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
APRIL 1, SEPTEMBER 30,
2004 2003
-------- -------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Mortgage Loan. Principal and interest will be paid in 193
remaining monthly installments. At April 1, 2004, the
coupon rate was 10.39% and the effective interest rate was
10.68%, net of unamortized fees of $99,767 ($104,665 in
2003)..................................................... 6,295 6,366
Mortgage Loans. Principal and interest are paid in monthly
installments. The loans expire in 2009, 2010, 2020 and
2021. Interest ranges from the prime rate to LIBOR plus
3.75%. At April 1, 2004, the blended coupon rate was 5.86%
and the effective interest rate was 6.22%, net of
unamortized fees of $134,032 ($137,563 in 2003)........... 6,736 6,909
Revolving Credit Agreement. Interest is paid monthly. The
blended interest rate at April 1, 2004 was 4.45%. (See
Note D)................................................... 5,687 5,705
Equipment Loans. Principal and interest will be paid in
monthly installments. The loans expire in 2010 and 2011
and bear interest at LIBOR plus 3.75%. At April 1, 2004,
the blended coupon rate was 4.84% and the effective
interest rate was 5.27%, net of unamortized fees of
$62,250 ($91,716 in 2003)................................. 6,818 7,616
Equipment Loan. Principal and interest will be paid in 73
remaining monthly installments. The loan expires in 2010.
At April 1, 2004, the coupon rate was 10.73% and the
effective interest rate was 11.10%, net of unamortized
fees of $7,075 ($9,450 in 2003)........................... 705 750
------- -------
74,895 76,997
Less current maturities..................................... 41,082 42,639
------- -------
$33,813 $34,358
======= =======
The mortgage loans are collateralized by $65,049,200 of property, at net
book value, of which $26,099,600 relates to assets classified as held for sale
on the balance sheet. The equipment loans are collateralized by $4,324,700 of
equipment, at net book value, of which $2,384,100 relates to assets classified
as held for sale on the balance sheet.
The Company has classified $32.7 million of its debt as current maturities
relating to assets held for sale. However, $32.1 million becomes due only when
sales of the assets of store locations classified as held for sale on the
balance sheet are consummated and the remaining $600,000 are regularly scheduled
debt payments.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt (net of loan fee amortization)
during the next five years are as follows (in thousands):
SEPTEMBER 30,
-------------
2004...................................................... $39,216
2005...................................................... 1,809
2006...................................................... 1,942
2007...................................................... 2,085
2008...................................................... 2,238
Thereafter.................................................. 27,605
-------
$74,895
=======
F-32
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2003, the Company entered into several Master Property
Disposition Agreements that amended, through October 31, 2004, certain terms of
the various loan agreements originated with and now serviced by GE Capital
Franchise Finance Corporation, (formerly Franchise Finance Corporation of
America or "FFCA"). Under these agreements, the lenders will permit the
disposition and release of their security interest on certain real property and
equipment assets that are part of the Company's strategic disposition program.
In addition, the lenders will accept reduced prepayment penalties or yield
maintenance payments, and forbear from enforcing any property fixed charge ratio
covenants, corporate fixed charge ratio covenants, or net worth covenants for
the duration of the agreements. The agreements also establish several
cross-escrow accounts, create liens against these accounts, and continue the
liens on certain real property and equipment assets that were part of the
original loan. Simultaneously, the Company entered into an agreement with its
revolving credit lender to provide a $4.0 million sub-limit under its existing
revolving credit agreement. (See Footnote D)
F. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
Certain directors and officers of the Company are also directors, officers
or controlling shareholders of other entities from which the Company leases its
corporate headquarters and various store and other locations under agreements
classified as operating leases. In addition, the Company leases store locations
from entities controlled by, or from persons related to, certain directors and
officers of the Company. Aggregate rentals in connection with all such leases
for the two quarters ended April 1, 2004 and April 3, 2003 were $752,400 and
$743,500, respectively.
The Company charges an affiliate for general and administrative services
provided. Such charges amounted to $5,600 in the two quarters ended April 1,
2004 and April 3, 2003, respectively.
On January 26, 2004, the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement
with Green Valley Acquisition Co., LLC, a privately-held company formed for the
purpose of acquiring the Company. The business and affairs of Green Valley
Acquisition Co., LLC are to be managed under the direction of a Board of
Managers, which currently consists of six individuals, three of whom have been
appointed by an entity controlled by Henry Sahakian, Daniel Sahakian and Ara
Kervandjian, and three of whom have been appointed by an entity controlled by
individuals who are not affiliated with the Company. (See Footnote B)
G. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS
No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which requires that such assets
with indefinite lives not be amortized but be tested annually for impairment and
provides specific guidance for such testing. This statement also requires
disclosure of information regarding goodwill and other assets that was
previously not required. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company
discontinued the amortization of goodwill as of October 1, 2002 and completed
its impairment test, using a discounted cash flow approach, during the 2003
second fiscal quarter. As a result, the Company wrote-off its total goodwill
balance of $5,857,000.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," effective October 1, 2002. SFAS No. 144
addressed the financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal
of long-lived assets. There was no impact on the Company's consolidated
financial position or results of operations as a result of the adoption of SFAS
No. 144.
The FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities" ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 applies immediately to variable interest entities
created after January 31, 2003, and to variable interest entities in which an
enterprise obtains an interest after that date. For variable interest entities
F-33
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
created before February 1, 2003, it becomes applicable for the first annual
period beginning after June 15, 2003.
In January 2004, the FASB revised the Interpretation and issued FIN 46R
which delays the effective date of FIN 46 prior to revision, except for
special-purpose entities, and has separate effective dates for certain public
entities that are small business issuers as defined by the SEC. The Company must
apply FIN 46 or FIN 46R for special-purpose entities no later than the end of
the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003. FIN 46R must be
applied to all entities no later than the end of the first reporting period that
ends after March 15, 2004. Based on management's assessment as of the date of
this report, management has determined that the adoption of FIN 46 has not had
an impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
H. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The carrying amounts of cash and short-term debt approximates fair value.
The Company estimates the fair value of its long-term, fixed-rate debt generally
using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company's current borrowing
rates for debt with similar maturities. The Company estimates the fair value of
its long-term, variable-rate debt based on carrying rates offered for similar
security, terms and maturity.
Fair value of capital lease obligations is estimated based on current rates
offered to the Company for similar debt.
The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instrument liabilities
are as follows (in thousands):
APRIL 1, 2004 SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
------------------ ------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- ------- -------- -------
Long-term debt:
Current maturities........................... $39,216 $39,216 $42,639 $42,639
Long-term debt............................... $35,679 $38,290 $34,358 $36,937
Obligations under capital leases:
Current maturities........................... $ 67 $ 67 $ 122 $ 122
Long-term debt............................... $ 83 $ 91 $ 92 $ 101
I. DEFERRED REVENUE AND OTHER LIABILITIES:
The Company generally records revenues when products are sold or services
rendered. In certain instances, the Company receives advance payments for
purchase commitments or other services and records revenue from such payments as
purchase commitments are met and services are performed in accordance with the
terms of the related contractual arrangements.
Deferred revenue and other liabilities includes the following (in
thousands):
APRIL 1, SEPTEMBER 30,
2004 2003
-------- -------------
Deferred revenue............................................ $3,314 $4,011
Other non-current liabilities............................... 83 90
------ ------
$3,397 $4,101
====== ======
F-34
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
J. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
During fiscal year 2003, the Company announced plans to divest 130 stores
and reclassified the assets relating to these stores as assets held for sale in
accordance with SFAS 144. At April 1, 2004, the Company had 122 remaining stores
classified as assets held for sale on its balance sheet with a net book value of
$40.8 million. The loss from discontinued operations lessened for the comparable
periods presented below due to the discontinuance of depreciation on assets held
for sale of $778,000 for the quarter ended April 1, 2004 and $1.6 million for
the two quarters ended April 1, 2004. The income and expense relating to these
stores is reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the
accompanying financial statements and are reported separately from the results
of continuing operations. The Company continues to operate these stores pending
successful negotiation of their sale or sub-lease. See Note A for limitations on
the Company's ability to sell or lease assets without the consent of Green
Valley.
The following is a summary of the operating results and net loss of
discontinued operations (in thousands, except per share data):
QUARTER ENDED TWO QUARTERS ENDED
------------------- -------------------
APRIL 1, APRIL 3, APRIL 1, APRIL 3,
2004 2003 2004 2003
-------- -------- -------- --------
Revenues....................................... $40,603 $37,320 $81,863 $76,156
Loss from discontinued operations.............. $ (456) $(1,378) $ (118) $(2,185)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations.... 0 (248) 0 (248)
Income tax benefit............................. 0 (84) 0 (128)
------- ------- ------- -------
Net loss from discontinued operations.......... $ (456) $(1,542) $ (118) $(2,305)
======= ======= ======= =======
Loss per share from discontinued operations.... $ (0.06) $ (0.22) $ (0.02) $ (0.32)
======= ======= ======= =======
K. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
(1) Leases -- The Company leases its corporate headquarters, 120 of its
store locations, certain equipment, offices, and maintenance and storage
facilities. Future minimum lease payments under capital leases and
noncancellable operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one
year at April 1, 2004 are shown below. Some of the leases provide for additional
rentals when sales exceed a specified amount and contain variable renewal
options and escalation clauses.
F-35
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
CAPITAL OPERATING RENTAL
LEASES LEASES INCOME
------- --------- ------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Six months ending September 30, 2004...................... $ 66 $ 2,863 $ 403
Fiscal Year 2005.......................................... 31 4,646 679
Fiscal Year 2006.......................................... 31 3,530 493
Fiscal Year 2007.......................................... 31 3,356 425
Fiscal Year 2008.......................................... 21 2,298 357
Thereafter................................................ 0 5,977 230
---- ------- ------
Total future minimum lease payments....................... 180 $22,670 $2,587
======= ======
Less amount representing interest......................... (30)
----
Present value of future payments.......................... 150
----
Less current maturities................................... (67)
----
$ 83
====
(2) Contingent Bonus -- If the proposed merger between the Company and
Green Valley, described above in Footnote B (the "Merger"), is completed,
certain executive officers, including Henry Sahakian and Ara Kervandjian who are
principle beneficial owners of Green Valley will be eligible to receive bonuses
pursuant to a Transaction Success Bonus Plan adopted by the Company in 2003. The
aggregate amount of such bonuses available under the plan is estimated to be
between $0 and $500,000 and will be based on several factors, including the
purchase price, the outstanding debt of the Company at closing and transaction
related expenses.
(3) Litigation -- The Company is involved in litigation and other legal
matters which have arisen in the normal course of business. Although the
ultimate results of these matters are not currently determinable, management
does not expect that they will have a material adverse effect on the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Between January 28, 2004 and January 30, 2004, three lawsuits were filed on
behalf of stockholders of the Company in Delaware Chancery Court against the
Company, the members of the Board of Directors and, in two actions, against
Green Valley, in connection with the proposed merger between Uni-Marts and Green
Valley. The three lawsuits have now been consolidated into one action.
The relevant complaint alleges that, among other things, Messrs. Henry and
Daniel Sahakian have a conflict of interest with respect to the merger, all the
Company's Directors have breached their fiduciary duties in approving and
structuring the merger, and the price to be paid to the stockholders is grossly
unfair and inadequate. The plaintiffs seek class action certification, an
injunction prohibiting the Company from completing the merger, rescission of the
merger if it is consummated or the award of recessionary damages, compensatory
damages, and an award of attorneys' fees and costs of the lawsuit. The Company
believes that the allegations in the complaints are without merit and intends to
defend the lawsuits vigorously.
L. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:
The Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation
using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board
("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and related
interpretations for all periods represented. Accordingly, compensation cost for
stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the
Company's common stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must
pay to acquire the stock. The following table
F-36
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation", to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands,
except per share data):
QUARTER ENDED TWO QUARTERS ENDED
-------------------- --------------------
APRIL 1, APRIL 3, APRIL 1, APRIL 3,
2004 2003 2004 2003
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net loss, as reported........................ $(1,352) $(2,275) $ (642) $(8,244)
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair
value based method for all awards, net of
related tax effects........................ 0 (2) 0 (2)
------- ------- ------ -------
Pro forma net loss........................... $(1,352) $(2,277) $ (642) $(8,246)
======= ======= ====== =======
Basic and diluted net loss per share as
reported................................... $ (0.19) $ (0.32) $(0.09) $ (1.15)
======= ======= ====== =======
Pro forma net loss per share................. $ (0.19) $ (0.32) $(0.09) $ (1.15)
======= ======= ====== =======
F-37
UNI-MARTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
M. CHANGES IN SECURITIES:
During the first two quarters of fiscal 2004, the Uni-Marts, Inc.
Retirement Savings and Incentive Plan purchased 10,202 shares of the Company's
treasury stock for $54,175 to fund its 401(k) retirement plan, resulting in a
decrease of additional paid-in capital of $35,489. The Company issued 2,750
shares of common stock to employees upon the exercise of stock options pursuant
to the Company's 1996 Equity Compensation Plan. The issuance of these shares
resulted in an increase of $4,215 to additional paid-in capital. The net effect
of these transactions for the first two quarters of fiscal 2004 was a decrease
to additional paid-in capital of $31,274.
ADDITIONAL
PAID
SHARES AMOUNT IN CAPITAL
------- --------- ----------
APRIL 1, 2004:
Sale of treasury stock............................... (10,202) $ (54,175) $(35,489)
Exercise of stock options............................ 2,750 4,490 4,215
------- --------- --------
(7,452) $ (49,685) $(31,274)
======= ========= ========
APRIL 3, 2003:
Sale of treasury stock............................... (24,296) $(128,045) $(99,525)
Employee stock purchase plan......................... 1,524 2,042 1,890
Shares issued to directors........................... 31,000 39,990 36,890
------- --------- --------
8,228 $ (86,013) $(60,745)
======= ========= ========
F-38
ANNEX A
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
BY AND BETWEEN
GREEN VALLEY ACQUISITION CO., LLC
AND
UNI-MARTS, INC.
DATED AS OF
JANUARY 26, 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Article 1. Definitions and Rules of Construction....................... 1
Section 1.1 Specific Definitions........................................ 1
Section 1.2 Additional Definitions...................................... 4
Section 1.3 Interpretation.............................................. 5
Article 2. The Merger.................................................. 5
Section 2.1 The Merger.................................................. 5
Section 2.2 Effective Time.............................................. 5
Section 2.3 Closing of the Merger....................................... 6
Section 2.4 Effects of the Merger....................................... 6
Section 2.5 Operating Agreement......................................... 6
Section 2.6 Members..................................................... 6
Section 2.7 Manager..................................................... 6
Section 2.8 Conversion of Shares........................................ 6
Section 2.9 Exchange of Certificates.................................... 6
Section 2.10 Stock Options............................................... 8
Section 2.11 Rights Plan................................................. 8
Section 2.12 Additional Actions.......................................... 8
Section 2.13 Cash Deposit................................................ 8
Article 3. Representation and Warranties of the Seller................. 9
Section 3.1 Organization and Qualification; Subsidiaries; Investments... 9
Section 3.2 Capitalization of the Seller and its Subsidiaries........... 9
Section 3.3 Authority Relative to this Agreement; Recommendation........ 11
Section 3.4 SEC Reports; Financial Statements; Sarbanes-Oxley........... 11
Section 3.5 Information Supplied........................................ 12
Section 3.6 Consents and Approvals; No Violations....................... 12
Section 3.7 No Default.................................................. 12
Section 3.8 No Undisclosed Liabilities; Absence of Changes.............. 13
Section 3.9 Litigation.................................................. 13
Section 3.10 Compliance with Applicable Law.............................. 14
Section 3.11 Employee Benefits........................................... 14
Section 3.12 Labor and Employment Matters................................ 16
Section 3.13 Environmental Matters....................................... 17
Section 3.14 Taxes....................................................... 19
Section 3.15 Intellectual Property....................................... 20
Section 3.16 Insurance................................................... 21
Section 3.17 Certain Business Practices.................................. 21
Section 3.18 Supplies.................................................... 21
Section 3.19 Real Property............................................... 21
Section 3.20 Personal Property........................................... 24
Section 3.21 Material Contracts.......................................... 24
Section 3.22 Vote Required............................................... 25
Section 3.23 Opinion of Financial Advisor................................ 25
Section 3.24 Brokers..................................................... 25
Section 3.25 Takeover Statutes........................................... 25
Section 3.26 Representations Complete.................................... 25
Article 4. Representations and Warranties of the Buyer................. 26
Section 4.1 Organization................................................ 26
Section 4.2 Authority Relative to this Agreement........................ 26
Section 4.3 Information Supplied........................................ 26
Section 4.4 Consents and Approvals; No Violations....................... 26
A-i
Section 4.5 Litigation.................................................. 27
Section 4.6 [Intentionally Omitted]..................................... 27
Section 4.7 Interim Operations of Buyer................................. 27
Section 4.8 Brokers..................................................... 27
Section 4.9 Representations Complete.................................... 27
Section 4.10 Financing................................................... 27
Article 5. Covenants................................................... 27
Section 5.1 Conduct of Business of the Companies........................ 27
Section 5.2 No Solicitation of Negotiation.............................. 30
Section 5.3 Meeting of Stockholders..................................... 32
Section 5.4 Access to Information....................................... 32
Section 5.5 Certain Filings; Reasonable Efforts......................... 33
Section 5.6 Public Announcements........................................ 33
Section 5.7 Indemnification and Directors' and Officers' Insurance...... 34
Section 5.8 Notification of Certain Matters............................. 35
Additions to and Modification of Seller Disclosure
Section 5.9 Schedule.................................................... 35
Section 5.10 Seller Employees; Plans..................................... 35
Section 5.11 Takeover Statutes........................................... 35
Section 5.12 Financial Certificate....................................... 36
Article 6. Conditions to Consummation of the Merger.................... 36
Conditions to Each Party's Obligations to Effect the
Section 6.1 Merger...................................................... 36
Section 6.2 Conditions to the Obligations of the Seller................. 36
Section 6.3 Conditions to the Obligations of the Buyer.................. 36
Article 7. Termination; Agreement; Waiver.............................. 38
Section 7.1 Termination................................................. 38
Section 7.2 Effect of Termination....................................... 39
Section 7.3 Fees and Expenses; Alternative Arrangements................. 39
Section 7.4 Amendment................................................... 40
Section 7.5 Extension; Waiver........................................... 40
Section 7.6 Tender Offer................................................ 40
Section 7.7 Maximum Damages............................................. 41
Article 8. Miscellaneous............................................... 41
Section 8.1 Non-Survival of Representations and Warranties.............. 41
Section 8.2 Entire Agreement; Assignment................................ 41
Section 8.3 Validity.................................................... 41
Section 8.4 Notices..................................................... 41
Section 8.5 Governing Law and Venue; Waiver of Jury Trial............... 43
Section 8.6 Descriptive Headings; Articles and Section References....... 43
Section 8.7 Parties of Interest......................................... 43
Section 8.8 Personal Liability.......................................... 44
Section 8.9 Specific Performance........................................ 44
Section 8.10 Counterparts; Facsimiles.................................... 44
Seller Disclosure Schedule
Section 3.1 Organization and Qualifications; Subsidiaries; Investments
Section 3.2 Capitalization of the Seller and its Subsidiaries
Section 3.6 Consents and Approvals; No Violations
Section 3.7 No Default
Section 3.8 No Undisclosed Liabilities; Absence of Changes
Section 3.9 Litigation
Section 3.11 Employee Benefits
A-ii
Section 3.12 Labor and Employment Matters
Section 3.13 Environmental Matters
Section 3.14 Taxes
Section 3.15 Intellectual Property
Section 3.16 Insurance
Section 3.18 Supplies
Section 3.19 Real Property
Section 3.20 Personal Property
Section 3.21 Material Contracts
Section 3.24 Brokers
Section 5.1 Conduct of Business of the Companies
A-iii
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Agreement"), dated as of January
26, 2004, is by and between GREEN VALLEY ACQUISITION CO., LLC, a Pennsylvania
limited liability company (the "Buyer"), and UNI-MARTS, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the "Seller" or the "Company"). Initially capitalized and certain
other terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to
such terms in Article 1 of this Agreement.
WHEREAS, the managers of the Buyer and the Board of Directors of the Seller
have each (i) determined that the Merger described herein is advisable and fair
and in the best interests of their respective equity holders and (ii) approved
the Merger upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, to induce the Buyer to enter into this Agreement, certain
principal stockholders of the Seller (the "Principal Stockholders") have entered
into a voting agreement and irrevocable proxy (each, a "Stockholder Agreement")
contemporaneous with the execution of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements herein contained, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the Buyer and the Seller hereby agree as
follows:
ARTICLE 1
DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 1.1 Specific Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement, the
following terms shall have the following meanings:
"Affiliate" shall mean, with respect to any Person (the "Subject Entity"),
any Person or other entity which controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, the Subject Entity.
"Aggregate Merger Consideration" shall mean the Merger Consideration
multiplied by the difference between (x) the number of Shares outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time as determined in accordance with Section
2.8(a) and (y) the number of Shares to be treated as Dissenting Shares
hereunder.
"Applicable Law" shall mean, with respect to any Person, any domestic or
foreign, federal, state or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation,
order, writ, injunction, judgment, decree or other requirement of any
Governmental Entity existing as of the date hereof or as of the Effective Time
applicable to such Person or any of its respective properties, assets, officers,
directors, employees, consultants or agents.
"Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
"Companies" shall mean the Seller and its Subsidiaries.
"DGCL" shall mean the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
"EBITDA" shall mean, for any period, the Companies' consolidated earnings
before interest expenses, Tax expenses, depreciation and amortization, each such
component to be determined in accordance with GAAP and in a manner consistent
with the presentation of EBITDA as set forth in the Seller's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003; provided, however, that
notwithstanding the foregoing, non-recurring revenue items and non-recurring
expense items (including expenses directly associated with the transactions
contemplated hereby) shall be excluded from the calculation of EBITDA.
"Exchange Agent" shall mean a bank or trust company designated by the Buyer
(and reasonably acceptable to the Seller) to serve as the exchange agent
hereunder.
A-1
"Final Date" shall mean July 31, 2004 except that if the Seller does not
file the preliminary copy of the Proxy Statement with the SEC by March 31, 2004,
the term "Final Date" shall mean the date which is the number of days after July
31, 2004 equal to the number of days after March 31, 2004 on which the
preliminary copy of the Proxy Statement is filed with the SEC (if applicable).
"GAAP" shall mean United States generally accepted accounting principles,
consistently applied.
"include" or "including" shall mean "include, without limitation" or
"including, without limitation," as the case may be, and the language following
"include" or "including" shall not be deemed to set forth an exhaustive list.
"knowledge" or "known" shall mean, with respect to statements made as to
the knowledge of Seller or Buyer, the actual or constructive knowledge (based
upon reasonable inquiry and investigation) of the executive officers of such
entity.
"Last Month End" shall mean (x) the last day of the calendar month
immediately preceding the calendar month in which the Closing occurs, if the
Closing occurs on the fifteenth through the thirty first day of any calendar
month and (y) the last day of the second calendar month immediately preceding
the calendar month in which the Closing occurs, if the Closing occurs on the
first through the fourteenth day of any calendar month.
"Lease" shall mean a lease evidencing the interest of any of the Companies
in any Leased Real Property or any portion thereof.
"Leased Real Property" shall mean all Real Property in which the interest
of any of the Companies is evidenced by a lease, license, or similar interest.
"Lender" shall mean any individual or entity, or group of related
individuals and/or entities, to which the Companies are indebted at any time
from the date hereof through and including the Effective Time, in the amount of
$250,000 or more.
"Lessor" shall mean any individual or entity, or group of related
individuals and/or entities, (i) from which the Companies lease any real
property or (ii) from which the Companies lease any personal property pursuant
to personal property leases which are not terminable without penalty in less
than ninety (90) days or which have annual rentals of more than $10,000.
"Material Adverse Effect" or "Material Adverse Change" means, when used in
connection with the Seller or the Buyer, any change, effect, event, occurrence,
condition or development or state of facts that (i) is or would reasonably be
expected to be materially adverse to the business, assets or results of
operations or condition (financial or other) of such party and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, or (ii) prevents or materially delays the consummation of the
Merger, in each case, not including any change, effect, event, occurrence,
condition or development or state of facts relating to or arising from (A) the
U.S. economy in general (and not having a materially disproportionate effect on
such party relative to most other entities in the Company's industry), (B)
changes in generally accepted accounting principles generally applicable to
companies engaged in a business which is the same or similar to that of such
party or any of its Subsidiaries, (C) changes or conditions relating to the
industry in which such party or any of its Subsidiaries operates (and not having
a materially disproportionate effect on such party relative to most other
industry participants), including, without limitation, the gasoline and tobacco
industries, (D) actions or omissions of such party or any of its Subsidiaries
required to be taken pursuant to this Agreement, (E) the reasonable expenses
incurred in connection with this Agreement and compliance therewith or (F) the
effects of any employment agreement, change in control agreement or severance
plan, agreement or similar arrangement to which such party or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party or by which it is bound if said agreement, plan or
arrangement has been disclosed to the other party prior to execution of this
Agreement; and provided further that, in the case of the Company, none of the
following shall constitute a Material Adverse Effect: (a) subject to the right
of the Buyer to terminate this Agreement as a result of the failure of the
conditions set forth in Sections 6.3(a), 6.3(b) or 6.3(e) to be satisfied,
failure of the Seller to obtain waivers of or written amendments from the
Lenders from
A-2
compliance with the covenants in loan agreements to the satisfaction of the
Buyer, (b) the delisting of the Shares from the American Stock Exchange, (c)
changes in such party's stock price or trading volume (provided that factors
causing such changes may be taken into account in determining whether a Material
Adverse Effect or Material Adverse Change exists) or (d) losses in any fiscal
quarter during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004 that are consistent
with losses in the comparable quarter during the fiscal year ended September 30,
2003, provided that fees and expenses incurred by the Seller in connection with
the negotiation, execution and performance of this Agreement shall be excluded
from the calculation of any such losses.
"Net Operating Assets" shall mean, as of a particular date, the Operating
Assets as of such date minus the Operating Liabilities as of such date.
"Operating Assets" shall mean, as of a particular date, the sum of the
Companies' consolidated cash, accounts receivable and book inventory, as
determined in accordance with GAAP.
"Operating Liabilities" shall mean, as of a particular date, the sum of the
Companies' accounts payable and amounts outstanding on all lines of credit, as
determined in accordance with GAAP.
"Owned Real Property" shall mean all Real Property other than Leased Real
Property.
"PALLCL" shall mean the Limited Liability Company Law of 1994 of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
"Person" shall mean any individual, corporation, partnership, limited
liability company, business trust, sole proprietorship, association, trust,
unincorporated organization or other legal entity, including any Governmental
Entity.
"Previously Filed SEC Report" shall mean any SEC Report which the Seller
was required to file with the SEC between October 1, 2001 and the day
immediately preceding the date hereof.
"Real Property" shall mean (i) the parcels of real property owned or leased
by the Companies and used for the locations of the Companies' business and all
buildings and improvements thereon, and all fixtures, rights, easements,
privileges, hereditaments belonging or appertaining thereto (including
condemnation awards) and any additions thereto (collectively, the "Store
Premises"), (ii) the parcels of unimproved real property owned or leased by the
Companies and all fixtures, rights, easements, privileges and hereditaments
belonging or appertaining thereto (including condemnation awards) and any
additions thereto (collectively, the "Unimproved Premises") and (iii) any other
real property owned or leased by the Companies.
"SEC" shall mean the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and
its successors.
"SEC Report" shall mean each report, document, exhibit, certificate and
other item which the Seller has been, is or will be required to file with the
SEC.
"Share" shall mean a share of the Seller's common stock, par value $.10 per
share.
"Stockholder" shall mean a holder of record of the Seller's capital stock
immediately prior to the Effective Time. "Stockholders" shall mean all such
holders.
"Subsidiary", when used with reference to a Person, shall mean any entity
(i) the accounts of which would be consolidated with those of such Person in
such Person's financial statements if such financial statements were prepared in
accordance with GAAP or (ii) of which securities or other ownership interests
representing more than 50% of the equity or more than 50% of the ordinary voting
power or, in the case of a partnership, more than 50% of the general partnership
interests or more than 50% of the profits or losses are owned, controlled or
held by such Person and/or one or more subsidiaries of such Person.
"Vendor" shall mean any individual or entity, or group of related
individuals and/or entities, other than a law firm or accounting firm, which (i)
supplies gasoline or cigarette products to the Companies or (ii) supplied to the
Companies, during the twelve months ended September 30, 2003, any other services
or
A-3
products to the Companies for which the Company paid more than $1,200,000 during
such twelve month period.
Section 1.2 Additional Definitions. The following terms are defined in the
following Sections of this Agreement:
TERM SECTION
---- ---------------------------
Buyer..................................................... Opening paragraph
Certificate of Merger..................................... 2.2
Certificates.............................................. 2.9(b)
Closing................................................... 2.3
Closing Date.............................................. 2.3
COBRA..................................................... 3.11(o)
Commonly Controlled Entity................................ 3.11(a)
Compensation and Benefit Plans............................ 3.11(a)
Dissenting Shares......................................... 2.8(d)
Effective Time............................................ 2.2
Environmental Damages..................................... 3.13(b)(i)
Environmental Requirements................................ 3.13(b)(ii)
ERISA..................................................... 3.11(a)
Exchange Act.............................................. 3.2(c)
Exchange Fund............................................. 2.9(a)
Financial Advisor......................................... 3.23
Financial Certificate..................................... 5.12
Final Cash Amount......................................... 5.12
Final EBITDA Amount....................................... 5.12
Final Net Operating Assets Amount
Former Real Property...................................... 3.13(b)(iii)
Governmental Entity....................................... 3.6
Hazardous Materials....................................... 3.13(b)(iv)
Indemnified Liabilities................................... 5.7(a)
Indemnified Persons....................................... 5.7(a)
Insurance Policies........................................ 3.16
Insured Parties........................................... 5.7(c)
Intellectual Property..................................... 3.15
Landlord.................................................. 3.19(d)
Lien...................................................... 3.2(b)
Meeting................................................... 5.3(a)
Merger.................................................... 2.1
Merger Consideration...................................... 2.8(a)
Notice of Superior Proposal............................... 5.2(b)
Other Interests........................................... 3.1(c)
Pension Plans............................................. 3.11(a)
Permitted Encumbrances.................................... 3.2(b)
Permitted Exceptions...................................... 3.19(a)
Personal Property......................................... 3.20(a)
Pre-Closing Date.......................................... 6.3(i)
A-4
TERM SECTION
---- ---------------------------
Proxy Statement........................................... 3.5
Rights Agreement.......................................... 3.2(a)
Seller.................................................... Opening paragraph
Seller Board; Seller's Board.............................. 3.3(a)
Seller Financial Statements............................... 3.4(a)
Seller Permits............................................ 3.10
Seller Stock Option....................................... 3.2(a)
Seller Securities......................................... 3.2(a)
Stockholder Agreement..................................... Recitals
Store Premises............................................ Definition of Real Property
Subject Entity............................................ Definition of Affiliate
Superior Proposal......................................... 5.2(c)
Surviving Entity.......................................... 2.1
Takeover Statute.......................................... 3.25
Tax; Taxes................................................ 3.14(a)(i)
Tax Return................................................ 3.14(a)(ii)
Third Party............................................... 5.2(c)
Third Party Acquisition................................... 5.2(c)
Unimproved Premises....................................... Definition of Real Property
SECTION 1.3 Interpretation. Unless otherwise indicated to the contrary
herein by the context or use thereof: (i) the words, "herein," "hereto,"
"hereof" and words of similar import refer to this Agreement as a whole and not
to any particular Section or paragraph hereof; (ii) words importing the
masculine gender shall also include the feminine and neutral genders, and vice
versa; and (iii) words importing the singular shall also include the plural, and
vice versa. All references to "the date hereof" shall constitute references to
January 26, 2004. All references to the "Agreement" herein or in any of the
schedules or exhibits annexed hereto or delivered in connection herewith shall
constitute references to this Agreement and Plan of Merger.
ARTICLE 2
THE MERGER
SECTION 2.1 The Merger. At the Effective Time and upon the terms and
subject to the conditions of this Agreement and in accordance with the DGCL and
the PALLCL, the Seller shall be merged with and into the Buyer (the "Merger").
Following the Merger, the Buyer shall continue as a limited liability company
(the "Surviving Entity") and the separate corporate existence of the Seller
shall cease.
SECTION 2.2 Effective Time. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth
in this Agreement, upon consummation of the Closing, certificates of merger
consistent with the terms hereof and prepared in accordance with the DGCL and
the PALLCL (the "Certificates of Merger") shall be duly executed and
acknowledged by the Buyer and the Seller and thereafter delivered for filing to
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and the Department of State of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania . The Merger shall become effective at such
time as a properly executed copy of a Certificate of Merger is duly filed with
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in accordance with Section
264(c) of the DGCL and with the Department of State of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania in accordance with Section 8958 of the PALLCL, or such later time
as the Buyer and the Seller may agree upon and as may be set forth in the
Certificate of Merger (the time the Merger becomes effective being referred to
herein as the "Effective Time").
A-5
SECTION 2.3 Closing of the Merger. The closing of the Merger (the
"Closing") will take place at a time and on a date (the "Closing Date") to be
specified by the Buyer upon at least two business days' advance notice to the
Company, which date shall be no later than the later of (x) the one hundred
thirty-fifth (135th) day after the date hereof and (y) the fifth business day
after satisfaction (or waiver) of the latest to occur of the conditions set
forth in Article 6, at the offices of McCausland, Keen & Buckman, 259 N.
Radnor-Chester Road, Suite 160, Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087, unless another time,
date or place is agreed to in writing by the parties hereto.
SECTION 2.4 Effects of the Merger. The Merger shall have the effects set
forth in the DGCL and the PALLCL. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing and subject thereto, at the Effective Time, all the properties,
rights, privileges, powers and franchises of the Seller and the Buyer shall vest
in the Surviving Entity, and all debts, liabilities and duties of the Seller and
the Buyer shall become the debts, liabilities and duties of the Surviving
Entity.
SECTION 2.5 Operating Agreement. The Operating Agreement (the "Operating
Agreement") of the Buyer in effect at the Effective Time shall be the Operating
Agreement of the Surviving Entity until amended in accordance with Applicable
Law and such Operating Agreement.
SECTION 2.6 Members. The members of the Buyer at the Effective Time shall
continue as members of the Surviving Entity.
SECTION 2.7 Managers. The managers of the Buyer at the Effective Time
shall continue as managers of the Surviving Entity, until changed in accordance
with the provisions of the Operating Agreement.
SECTION 2.8 Conversion of Shares.
(a) At the Effective Time, each Share issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time (other than (i) Shares held in the Seller's treasury
or by any of the Seller's Subsidiaries) shall, by virtue of the Merger and
without any action on the part of the Buyer, the Seller or the holder thereof,
be converted into and shall become the right to receive an amount in cash equal
to $2.25 (the "Merger Consideration"), which shall be payable in accordance with
Section 2.9(b).
(b) At the Effective Time, each outstanding membership interest in the
Buyer shall remain outstanding.
(c) At the Effective Time, each Share held in the treasury of the Seller
and each Share held by any Subsidiary of the Seller shall, by virtue of the
Merger and without any action on the part of the Buyer, the Seller or the holder
thereof, be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and no Merger
Consideration shall be delivered with respect thereto.
(d) Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the contrary, any
holder of Shares shall have the right to dissent in the manner provided in
Section 262 of the DGCL, and if all necessary requirements of the DGCL are met
and the Merger is consummated, such Shares shall be entitled to payment of the
fair value of such Shares in accordance with the provisions of the DGCL
("Dissenting Shares"); provided, however, that (i) if any holder of Dissenting
Shares shall subsequently withdraw such holder's demand for appraisal of such
shares within sixty (60) days of the Effective Time, or, with the written
consent of the Surviving Entity, any time thereafter, or (ii) if any holders
fail to follow the procedures for establishing such holder's entitlement to
appraisal rights as provided in the DGCL, the right to appraisal of such Shares
shall be forfeited and each such Share shall thereupon be deemed to have been
converted into the right to receive and to have become exchangeable for, as of
the Effective Time, the Merger Consideration such holder would have been
entitled to receive had such holder not exercised dissenters' rights.
SECTION 2.9 Exchange of Certificates.
(a) From time to time following the Effective Time, the Buyer shall deliver
to the Exchange Agent, for the benefit of the holders of Shares other than the
holders of Shares who, as of the Effective Time, are obligated to contribute
their right to receive the Merger Consideration directly or indirectly to the
Buyer,
A-6
an amount of cash equal to the Merger Consideration then payable to such holders
pursuant to Section 2.8(a) (such amount of cash is hereinafter referred to as
the "Exchange Fund") in exchange for outstanding Shares. The Exchange Agent
shall invest the Merger Consideration that it has received in cash as directed
by the Surviving Entity, on a daily basis. Any interest and other income
resulting from such investments shall be paid to the Surviving Entity. Any net
loss resulting from such investments shall be borne by the Buyer and the Buyer
will deposit additional funds with the Exchange Agent in an amount equal to such
net loss before the funds are paid by the Exchange Agent to the Seller's
stockholders.
(b) Prior to the Closing, the Buyer shall enter into an exchange agency
agreement (which agreement shall be acceptable to the Seller, such acceptance
not to be unreasonably withheld) with the Exchange Agent pursuant to which the
Exchange Agent shall perform the obligations of the Exchange Agent described in
this Agreement. As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, the Buyer shall
mail, or shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail, to each holder of record of a
certificate or certificates (the "Certificates") which immediately prior to the
Effective Time represented Shares which were converted into the right to receive
the Merger Consolidation pursuant to Section 2.8(a), a letter of transmittal
(which shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title
to the Certificates shall pass, only upon delivery of the Certificates to the
Exchange Agent and shall be in such form and have such other provisions as the
Buyer may reasonably specify, including customary waivers and releases of
liability and which shall contain instructions for effecting the surrender of
the Certificates in exchange for the Merger Consideration). Upon surrender of a
Certificate for cancellation to the Exchange Agent, together with a duly
executed letter of transmittal, the holder of such Certificate shall be entitled
to receive in exchange therefor (and, except in the case of holders of Shares
who, as of the Effective Time, are obligated to contribute their right to
receive the Merger Consideration directly or indirectly to the Buyer, the Buyer
shall cause the Exchange Agent to promptly deliver) a check representing the
Merger Consideration for each Share multiplied by the number of Shares
represented by such Certificate, after giving effect to any required withholding
tax, and the Shares represented by the Certificate so surrendered shall
forthwith be canceled. No interest will be paid or accrued on the cash payable
upon the surrender of Certificates. In the event of a transfer of ownership of
Shares which is not registered on the transfer records of the Seller, a check
for the cash payable to the transferee may be issued to such transferee if the
Certificate representing such Shares is presented to the Exchange Agent,
accompanied by all documents required to evidence and effect such transfer and
to evidence that any applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid. Until
surrendered as contemplated by this Section 2.9, each Certificate shall be
deemed at any time after the Effective Time to represent only the right to
receive upon such surrender the Merger Consideration for each Share so
surrendered.
(c) In the event that any Certificate for Shares shall have been lost,
stolen or destroyed, the Exchange Agent shall issue in exchange therefor upon
the making of an affidavit of that fact by the holder thereof a check equal to
the number of such Shares multiplied by the Merger Consideration; provided,
however, that Buyer or the Exchange Agent may, in its discretion, require the
delivery of a suitable bond or indemnity.
(d) If, after the Effective Time, Certificates are presented to the
Surviving Entity for any reason, they shall be canceled and exchanged as
provided in this Article 2.
(e) Any portion of the Exchange Fund that remains undistributed to the
stockholders of the Seller on the first anniversary of the Effective Time shall
be delivered to the Buyer upon demand and any Stockholders of the Seller who
have not theretofore complied with this Article 2 shall thereafter look only to
the Buyer as general creditors for payment of their claims for the aggregate
amount of Merger Consideration to which they are entitled pursuant to this
Article 2.
(f) Neither the Buyer, as the Surviving Entity, or the Exchange Agent shall
be liable to any Person in respect of any cash from the Exchange Fund delivered
to a public official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or
similar law. If any Certificate shall not have been surrendered prior to seven
years after the Effective Time (or immediately prior to such earlier date on
which any cash in respect of such Certificate would otherwise escheat to or
become the property of any Governmental
A-7
Entity), any such cash in respect of such Certificate shall, to the extent
permitted by Applicable Laws, become the property of the Buyer free and clear of
all claims or interest of any Person previously entitled thereto.
SECTION 2.10 Stock Options. At the Effective Time, each Seller Stock
Option which is outstanding and unexercised immediately prior thereto, whether
or not then vested or exercisable, shall be canceled and all rights thereunder
shall be extinguished. As consideration for such cancellation, the Buyer shall
make payment immediately after the Effective Time to each holder of a Seller
Stock Option (outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time) of an amount,
if any, determined by multiplying (x) the number of Shares underlying such
Seller Stock Option by (y) an amount equal to the excess (if any) of (i) the
Merger Consideration, over (ii) the exercise price per share of such Seller
Stock Option, after giving effect to any required withholding tax, provided,
however, that no such payment shall be made to a holder unless and until such
holder has executed and delivered to the Buyer an instrument in such form
prescribed by the Buyer accepting such payment in full settlement of his or her
rights relative to such Seller Stock Option. Prior to the Effective Time, the
Seller shall take or cause to be taken all actions required under all applicable
plans and agreements to provide for the foregoing.
SECTION 2.11 Rights Plan. Pursuant to amendments to the Rights Agreement
approved and adopted by the Seller's Board of Directors prior to the execution
of this Agreement (copies of which have been delivered to the Buyer), each of
the Buyer, any Subsidiary of the Buyer, and any member, manager, officer,
director, stockholder, employee or consultant of the Buyer or any Subsidiary of
the Buyer (each, a "Buyer Affiliate"), will not constitute an "Acquiring Person"
for purposes of the Rights Agreement as a result of (i) the Buyer's execution or
performance of this Agreement, (ii) the Buyer's commencement of a tender offer
in accordance with Section 7.6 of this Agreement or otherwise, (iii) the receipt
by Buyer or any Affiliate of Buyer of Shares from beneficial owners of Buyer, or
(iv) the execution by any Grandfathered Stockholder (as defined in the Rights
Agreement) of a voting agreement with Buyer, pursuant to which such
Grandfathered Stockholder grants an irrevocable proxy to Buyer or an Affiliate
of Buyer to vote in favor of this Agreement and the Merger. Except where Seller
has determined to enter into an agreement with a third party with respect to a
Superior Proposal in compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in
Section 5.2(b), no further amendment shall be made to the Rights Agreement
without Buyer's consent.
SECTION 2.12 Additional Actions. If, at any time after the Effective
Time, the Surviving Entity shall consider or be advised that any further deeds,
assignments or assurances in law or any other acts are necessary or desirable to
(a) vest, perfect or confirm, of record or otherwise, in the Surviving Entity
its right, title or interest in, to or under any of the rights, properties or
assets of the Seller, or (b) otherwise carry out the provisions of this
Agreement, the Seller and its officers and directors shall be deemed to have
granted to the Surviving Entity an irrevocable power of attorney to execute and
deliver all such deeds, assignments or assurances in law and to take all acts
necessary, proper or desirable to vest, perfect or confirm title to and
possession of such rights, properties or assets in the Surviving Entity and
otherwise to carry out the provisions of this Agreement, and the officers,
managers and members of the Surviving Entity are authorized in the name of the
Seller or otherwise to take any and all such actions.
SECTION 2.13 Cash Deposit.
a. Simultaneous with the execution of this Agreement, Buyer is delivering
to Seller the sum of $400,000 (the "Cash Deposit"). If such funds are not
otherwise expended prior to the Closing, the Cash Deposit shall be applied at
the Closing toward the Aggregate Merger Consideration.
b. If this Agreement is terminated prior to Closing by either party
pursuant to Section 7.1(b), by Buyer pursuant to Section 7.1(d) or 7.1(e) or by
the Seller pursuant to Section 7.1(c)(iii) or 7.1(c)(iv), the Cash Deposit shall
be returned to the Buyer immediately upon the effectiveness of such termination.
c. If this Agreement is terminated prior to Closing by the Seller pursuant
to Section 7.1(c)(i) or 7.1(c)(ii), then Seller shall retain the Cash Deposit
(and such amount shall reduce any potential liability of Buyer to Seller
pursuant to Section 7.7 of this Agreement).
A-8
d. If Buyer and Seller mutually consent in writing to the termination of
this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(a), such mutual consent shall designate
which party shall be entitled to the Cash Deposit.
ARTICLE 3
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE SELLER
The Seller hereby represents and warrants to the Buyer, subject to the
exceptions set forth in the disclosure schedule (the "Seller Disclosure
Schedule") delivered by the Seller to the Buyer contemporaneous with the
execution of this Agreement (which exceptions shall specifically identify a
Section or subsection of this Agreement, as applicable, to which such exception
relates) that:
SECTION 3.1 Organization and Qualification; Subsidiaries; Investments.
(a) Section 3.1(a) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true,
complete and correct list of all of the Seller's Subsidiaries, together with the
jurisdiction of incorporation of each such Subsidiary and the percentage of each
such Subsidiary's outstanding capital stock or other equity interests owned by
the Seller or another Subsidiary of the Seller. Each of the Seller and each of
its Subsidiaries is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under
the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation or organization and has all
requisite corporate power and corporate authority to own, lease and operate its
properties and to carry on its businesses as now being conducted. The Seller has
heretofore delivered to the Buyer's counsel true, complete and correct copies of
the certificate of incorporation and bylaws (or similar governing documents), as
currently in full force and effect, of the Seller and each of its Subsidiaries.
Section 3.1(a) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule specifically identifies each
Subsidiary of the Seller that owns or leases any material assets or through
which the Seller conducts any material operations. Except as set forth in
Section 3.1(a) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, the Seller has no Subsidiaries
other than those incorporated in a state of the United States.
(b) The Seller and its Subsidiaries are duly qualified or licensed and in
good standing to do business in each jurisdiction in which the property owned,
leased or operated by them or the nature of the business conducted by them makes
such qualification or licensing necessary, except in such jurisdictions where
the failure to be so duly qualified or licensed and in good standing would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Seller.
(c) Section 3.1(c) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true,
complete and correct list of each equity investment in an amount of One Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or more or that represents a five percent (5%) or
greater ownership interest in the subject of such investment made by the Seller
or any of its Subsidiaries in any Person other than the Seller's Subsidiaries
("Other Interests"). The Other Interests are owned by the Seller, by one or more
of the Seller's Subsidiaries or by the Seller and one or more of its
Subsidiaries, in each case free and clear of all Liens.
(d) Section 3.1(d) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule sets forth the
location of each of the Store Premises, specifies whether or not gasoline and
cigarettes are sold at each such location and indicates whether the real estate
at each such location is owned or leased by the Companies.
SECTION 3.2 Capitalization of the Seller and its Subsidiaries.
(a) The authorized capital stock of the Seller consists of 16,000,000
Shares, of which, as of the close of business on December 31, 2003, 7,195,223
Shares were issued and outstanding, and 100,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $1.00 per share, no shares of which are outstanding. All of the
outstanding Shares have been validly issued and are fully paid, nonassessable
and free of preemptive rights. Pursuant to a Rights Agreement, dated February 6,
2002, between the Seller and Mellon Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent (the
"Rights Agreement"), the Seller has issued to its stockholders certain rights to
purchase shares of the Seller's capital stock. As of the date hereof, a total of
1,152,250 Shares are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding Seller Stock
Options. For purposes hereof, "Seller Stock Option" means any option, warrant or
other right to purchase Shares granted pursuant to any plan, agreement (other
than the Rights Agreement) or other arrangement binding upon the Companies.
Section 3.2(a) of the Seller
A-9
Disclosure Schedule identifies each plan, agreement or other arrangement
pursuant to which any Seller Stock Options have been granted, identifies the
holder of each Seller Stock Option, sets forth the number of Shares subject to
each Seller Stock Option, sets forth the vesting schedule of each Seller Stock
Option and sets forth the date on which each Seller Stock Option expires. The
Seller has provided to the Buyer's counsel a true, complete and correct copy of
the Rights Agreement, as amended as provided in Section 2.11, and a true,
complete and correct copy of each plan, agreement and other arrangement
identified on such Schedule 3.2(a). Since the close of business on June 30,
2003, no shares of the Seller's capital stock have been issued other than
pursuant to Seller Stock Options already in existence on such date and no rights
have been exercised or shares of the Seller's capital stock issued pursuant to
the Rights Agreement. Except as set forth above or in Section 3.2(a) of the
Seller Disclosure Schedule, as of the date hereof, there are outstanding (i) no
shares of capital stock or other voting securities of the Seller, (ii) no
securities of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries convertible into or
exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock or other securities of
the Seller, (iii) no options, preemptive or other rights to acquire from the
Seller or any of its Subsidiaries, and no obligations of the Seller or any of
its Subsidiaries to issue, any capital stock, voting securities or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for capital stock or other
securities of the Seller and (iv) no equity equivalent interests in the
ownership or earnings of the Seller or its Subsidiaries or other similar rights
(collectively "Seller Securities"). There are no outstanding rights or
obligations of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any Seller Securities. Except as set forth in Section 3.2(a)
of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, there are no stockholder agreements, voting
trusts or other agreements or understandings to which the Seller is a party or
by which it is bound relating to the voting or registration of any shares of
capital stock of the Seller. The Seller has not voluntarily accelerated the
vesting of any Seller Stock Options as a result of the Merger or any other
change in control of the Seller, except as required under Seller's option plans
to the extent that such requirement is specifically described in Section 3.2(a)
of the Seller Disclosure Schedule.
(b) Except as set forth in Section 3.2(b) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, all of the outstanding capital stock of the Seller's Subsidiaries is
owned by the Seller, directly or indirectly, free and clear of any Lien or any
other limitation or restriction (including any restriction on the right to vote
or sell the same except as a matter of Applicable Law). Except as set forth in
Section 3.2(b) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, there are no securities of the
Seller or any of its Subsidiaries convertible into or exchangeable or
exercisable for, or other rights to acquire from the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries, any capital stock or other ownership interests in or any other
securities of any Subsidiary of the Seller, and there exists no other contract,
understanding, arrangement or obligation (whether or not contingent) providing
for the issuance or sale, directly or indirectly, of any such capital stock.
Except as set forth in Section 3.2(b) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, there
are no outstanding contractual obligations of the Seller or its Subsidiaries to
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any outstanding shares of capital stock
or other ownership interests in any Subsidiary of the Seller. With respect to
any exception to ownership set forth in Section 3.2(b) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, the schedule completely and correctly identifies the record and the
beneficial owner of any such shares, whether such record or beneficial owner is
an employee, agent or affiliate of the Seller, and any agreement, arrangement or
understanding, whether written or oral, with respect to such ownership. With
respect to any exception to the contractual obligations of the Seller set forth
in Section 3.2(b) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, the schedule completely and
correctly identifies the parties to such obligations and the nature of any
relationship of such party or any third party beneficiary of such obligations to
the Seller and any agreement, arrangement or understanding, whether written or
oral, with respect to such relationship. For purposes of this Agreement, "Lien"
means, with respect to any asset (including any security), any mortgage, lien,
pledge, charge, security interest or encumbrance of any kind in respect of such
asset; provided, however, that the term "Lien" shall not include the following
restrictions (collectively referred to as "Permitted Encumbrances"): (i)
statutory liens for Taxes and other public charges on Real Property that are not
yet due and payable, (ii) statutory liens for Taxes and other public charges on
Real Property that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings
and that are either disclosed in Section 3.2(b) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule or are not material, (iii) statutory or common law liens to secure
obligations to
A-10
landlords, lessors or renters under leases or rental agreements confined to the
premises rented, (iv) deposits or pledges made in connection with, or to secure
payment of, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, old age pension or
other social security programs mandated by Applicable Law, (v) statutory or
common law liens in favor of carriers, warehousemen, mechanics and materialmen,
to secure claims for labor, materials or supplies and other like liens, (vi)
restrictions on transfer of securities imposed by applicable state and federal
securities laws, (vii) purchase money liens and liens for trade credit extended
in the ordinary course of business, (viii) governmental requirements relating to
Real Property, including, without limitation, zoning, subdivision, environmental
and land use statutes and ordinances and all rules and regulations promulgated
by governmental bodies having jurisdiction, (ix) easements, privileges, licenses
or rights of public utilities, municipal utilities, public service companies and
municipal service companies, provided the same do not interfere with the current
use or materially detract from the value of the relevant Real Property; (ix)
easements or servitudes apparent from an inspection of the premises and any
variation in location or dimensions, conflict with lines of adjoining
properties, encroachments, projections, or other matters which might be
disclosed by an accurate survey of the relevant Real Property and (x) rights of
tenants of the Companies at a Real Property.
(c) The Shares constitute the only class of equity securities of the Seller
or its Subsidiaries registered or required to be registered under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").
(d) The Principal Stockholders own of record and beneficially and/or
control, and have the power to vote and dispose of, approximately 2,056,149
Shares, which represent approximately 28.5% of the outstanding Shares as of the
date hereof.
SECTION 3.3 Authority Relative to this Agreement; Recommendation.
(a) The Seller has all necessary corporate power and corporate authority to
execute and deliver this Agreement, to perform its obligations under this
Agreement, and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution
and delivery of this Agreement, and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby, have been duly and validly authorized by the Board of
Directors of the Seller (the "Seller Board" or "Seller's Board"), and no other
corporate proceedings on the part of the Seller are necessary to authorize this
Agreement, or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, except the
approval of this Agreement by the holders of a majority of the outstanding
Shares. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by the
Seller and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery by the Buyer,
constitutes the valid, legal and binding agreement of the Seller, enforceable
against the Seller in accordance with its terms, subject to any applicable
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws now or
hereafter in effect relating to creditors' rights generally or to general
principles of equity.
(b) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Seller Board and
the Ad Hoc Committee of the Board have (i) unanimously approved this Agreement,
the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby, (ii) unanimously
resolved to recommend approval and adoption of this Agreement, the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated hereby by the Seller's stockholders, and
(iii) not withdrawn or modified such approval or resolution to recommend (except
as otherwise permitted in this Agreement).
SECTION 3.4 SEC Reports; Financial Statements; Sarbanes-Oxley.
(a) The Seller has filed with the SEC all SEC Reports which the Seller has
been required to file since September 30, 2000, each of which complied at the
time of filing in all material respects with all applicable requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act,
and each regulation as in effect on the dates such forms, reports and documents
were filed. None of such SEC Reports, including any financial statements,
certifications of officers or schedules included or incorporated by reference
therein, contained when filed any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted
to state a material fact required to be stated or incorporated by reference
therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein in light of the
circumstances under which they were made not
A-11
misleading. The consolidated financial statements of the Seller included in the
SEC Reports (the "Seller Financial Statements") fairly present, in conformity in
all material respects with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a
consistent basis (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto), the
consolidated financial position of the Seller and its consolidated Subsidiaries
as of the dates thereof and their consolidated results of operations, cash flows
and changes in stockholders' equity for the periods covered thereby. All
adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to
present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows of the Seller for all quarterly periods reflected in the Seller
Financial Statements have been made.
(b) The Seller is in compliance in all material respects with all aspects
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 applicable to it.
SECTION 3.5 Information Supplied. None of the information supplied or to
be supplied by the Seller for inclusion or incorporation by reference in the
proxy statement relating to the meeting of the Seller's stockholders to be held
in connection with the Merger (the "Proxy Statement") will, at the date mailed
to stockholders of the Seller and at the time of the meeting of stockholders of
the Seller to be held in connection with the Merger, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein in light of
the circumstances under which they are made not misleading. The Proxy Statement
insofar as it relates to the meeting of the Seller's stockholders to vote on the
Merger will comply as to form in all material respects with the provisions of
the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Seller makes no representation, warranty or covenant with respect
to any information supplied or required to be supplied by the Buyer that is
contained in or omitted from the Proxy Statement.
SECTION 3.6 Consents and Approvals; No Violations. Except for filings,
permits, authorizations, consents and approvals as may be required under
applicable requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, state
securities or blue sky laws, Pennsylvania licensing laws applicable to sellers
of tobacco products and the filing and recordation of the Certificate of Merger
as required by the DGCL and the PALLCL, no filing with or notice to, and no
permit, authorization, consent or approval of any United States (federal, state
or local) or foreign court or tribunal, or administrative, governmental or
regulatory body, agency or authority (a "Governmental Entity") is necessary for
the execution and delivery by the Seller of this Agreement or the consummation
by the Seller of the transactions contemplated hereby. Neither the execution,
delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Seller, nor the consummation
by the Seller of the transactions contemplated hereby, will (a) conflict with or
result in any breach of any provision of the respective Certificate of
Incorporation or bylaws (or similar governing documents) of the Seller or any of
its Subsidiaries, (b) except as set forth in Section 3.6 of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule, result in a violation or breach of or constitute (with or
without due notice or lapse of time or both) a default (or give rise to any
right of termination, amendment, cancellation or acceleration or Lien) under any
of the terms, conditions or provisions of any material note, bond, mortgage,
indenture, lease, license, contract (including any material supply contract),
agreement or other instrument or obligation to which the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party or by which any of them or any of their respective
properties and assets is bound, or (c) violate any order, writ, injunction,
decree, law, statute, rule or regulation applicable to the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets.
SECTION 3.7 No Default. Except as set forth in Section 3.7 of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule, neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries is in
material breach, default or violation (and no event has occurred that with
notice or the lapse of time or both would constitute a material breach, default
or violation) of any term, condition or provision of (i) its Certificate of
Incorporation or bylaws (or similar governing documents), (ii) any material
note, bond, mortgage, indenture, lease, license, contract (including any
material supply contract), agreement or other instrument or obligation to which
the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries is now a party or by which it or any of
its properties and assets is bound or (iii) any order, writ, injunction, decree,
law, statute, rule or regulation applicable to the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets, except (in the
case of clauses (ii) and (iii)) where such breach, default or violation would
not have a Material Adverse Effect on the Seller.
A-12
SECTION 3.8 No Undisclosed Liabilities; Absence of Changes. Except as and
to the extent reflected in the Seller Financial Statements or as set forth in
Section 3.8 of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, neither the Seller nor any of its
Subsidiaries has any liabilities or obligations of any nature, whether or not
accrued, contingent or otherwise, other than liabilities or obligations incurred
after September 30, 2003 in the ordinary course of business. Except as publicly
disclosed by the Seller in the Previously Filed SEC Reports or as set forth in
Section 3.8 of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, since September 30, 2003, there
have been no events, changes or effects with respect to the Seller or its
Subsidiaries that, individually or in the aggregate, constitute a Material
Adverse Effect on the Seller. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
except as and to the extent publicly disclosed by the Seller in the Previously
Filed SEC Reports or as set forth in Section 3.8 of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, since September 30, 2003, the Seller and its Subsidiaries have
conducted their respective businesses in all material respects only in, and have
not engaged in any material transaction other than according to, the ordinary
and usual course of such businesses consistent with past practices, and there
has not been any (i) material damage, destruction or other casualty loss in
excess of $50,000 with respect to any material asset or property owned, leased
or otherwise used by the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries, not covered by
insurance; (ii) declaration, setting aside or payment of any dividend or other
distribution in respect of the capital stock of the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries (other than on the capital stock of wholly-owned Subsidiaries of
the Seller) or any repurchase, redemption or other purchase by the Seller or any
of its Subsidiaries of any outstanding shares of capital stock or other
securities of, or other ownership interests in, the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries; (iii) amendment of any material term of any outstanding security
of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries; (iv) incurrence, assumption or
guarantee by the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries of any indebtedness for
borrowed money other than in the ordinary course of business and in amounts and
on terms consistent with past practices or in an amount less than $50,000 in the
aggregate; (v) creation or assumption by the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries
of any Lien on any portion of its assets other than Permitted Encumbrances or
Liens created or assumed in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practices; (vi) loan, advance or capital contributions made by the Seller or any
of its Subsidiaries to, or investment in, any Person other than (X) loans or
advances to employees in connection with business-related expenses incurred in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices and in accordance
with all Applicable Laws and (Y) loans, advances or capital contributions to or
investments in wholly-owned Subsidiaries of the Seller, and in each case made in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices; (vii)
transaction or commitment made, or any contract or agreement entered into, by
the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries relating to its assets or business
(including the purchase (by sale, license or otherwise) or disposition (by sale,
license or otherwise) of its assets) or any relinquishment by the Seller or any
of its Subsidiaries of any contract, agreement or other right, in any such case,
material to the Seller and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; (viii) execution
by the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries of any exclusive license, distribution,
marketing, sales or other agreement or any agreement to enter into any exclusive
license, distribution, marketing, sales or other agreement; (ix) change by the
Seller or any of its Subsidiaries in any of its accounting principles, practices
or methods; or (x) issuance of any shares of the Seller's capital stock other
than upon the exercise of Seller Stock Options outstanding on September 30,
2003. Since September 30, 2003, except as disclosed in the Previously Filed SEC
Reports or in Section 3.8 of the Seller Disclosure Schedule or increases in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practices, there has not been
any increase in the compensation payable or that could become payable by the
Seller or any of its Subsidiaries to (a) officers of the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries or (b) any employee of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries whose
annual cash compensation is Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) or more.
SECTION 3.9 Litigation. Except as publicly disclosed by the Seller in the
Previously Filed SEC Reports or as set forth in Section 3.9 of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule, there is no suit, claim, action, arbitration or proceeding
pending or, to the Seller's knowledge, threatened and to the Seller's knowledge
there is no investigation pending or threatened, in any case against the Seller
or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets
before any Governmental Entity or brought by any person in any case which would,
if adversely determined, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Seller, or would
reasonably be expected to prevent or delay the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this
A-13
Agreement beyond the Final Date. Except as publicly disclosed by the Seller in
the Previously Filed SEC Reports, neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries
is subject to any outstanding order, writ, injunction, condemnation proceeding
or decree that would reasonably be expected to be material or would reasonably
be expected to prevent or delay the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby.
SECTION 3.10 Compliance with Applicable Law. Except as publicly disclosed
and specifically identified by the Seller in the Previously Filed SEC Reports,
the Seller and its Subsidiaries hold all material permits, licenses, variances,
exemptions, orders and approvals of all Governmental Entities necessary for the
lawful conduct of their respective businesses (the "Seller Permits"). Except as
publicly disclosed and specifically identified by the Seller in the Previously
Filed SEC Reports, the Seller and its Subsidiaries are in material compliance
with the terms of the Seller Permits. Except as publicly disclosed and
specifically identified by the Seller in the Previously Filed SEC Reports, the
businesses of the Seller and its Subsidiaries have been and are being conducted
in compliance in all material respects with all Applicable Laws (it being
understood that the Sellers and its Subsidiaries shall be deemed to have
satisfied this sentence if the cost of remedying all instances of non-compliance
known by the Sellers does not exceed $100,000 in the aggregate). Except as
publicly disclosed and specifically identified by the Seller in the Previously
Filed SEC Reports, no investigation or review by any Governmental Entity with
respect to the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries is pending or, to the Seller's
knowledge, threatened, nor has the Seller received written notice from any
Governmental Entity indicating an intention to conduct the same.
SECTION 3.11 Employee Benefits.
(a) For purposes of this Agreement, "Compensation and Benefit Plans" means,
collectively, each written bonus, deferred compensation, pension, retirement,
profit-sharing, thrift, savings, employee stock ownership, stock bonus, stock
purchase, restricted stock, stock option, employment, termination, severance,
compensation, medical, health, or other plan, agreement, policy or arrangement,
that covers employees, officers or directors of the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries, or pursuant to which former employees, officers or directors of
the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries are entitled to current or future
benefits. To the Seller's knowledge, except as set forth in Section 3.11(a) of
the Seller Disclosure Schedule, there are no oral Compensation and Benefit Plans
to which the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries is a party. The Seller has
delivered to the Buyer's counsel true, complete and correct copies of all
"employee pension benefit plans" (as defined in Section 3(2) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA")) (sometimes
referred to herein as "Pension Plans"), "employee welfare benefit plans" (as
defined in Section 3(l) of ERISA) and all other Compensation and Benefit Plans
maintained, or contributed to, by the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries or any
Person that, together with the Seller and its Subsidiaries, is treated as a
single employer under Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code (the Seller,
each of its Subsidiaries and each such other Person, a "Commonly Controlled
Entity") for the benefit of any current or former employees, officers or
directors of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries. The Seller has also made
available to the Buyer's counsel true, complete and correct copies of (i) the
three most recent annual reports on Form 5500 filed with the Internal Revenue
Service with respect to each Compensation and Benefit Plan (if any such report
was required), (ii) the summary plan descriptions for each Compensation and
Benefit Plan for which a summary plan description is required, (iii) each trust
agreement and group annuity contract related to any Compensation and Benefit
Plan, (iv) the three most recent financial statements and actuarial reports for
each Compensation and Benefit Plan and (v) the most recent determination letter
issued by the Internal revenue Service with respect to each Pension Plan.
Neither the Seller nor any other Commonly Controlled Entity maintains or has
ever maintained a "defined benefit plan" (as defined in Section 415 of the Code)
or a plan that is subject to Section 419 of the Code. Section 3.11(a) of the
Seller Disclosure Schedule sets forth a complete and correct list of all
Compensation and Benefit Plans.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in Section 3.11(b) of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule, the Seller and its Subsidiaries have performed in all
material respects their obligations under each Compensation and Benefit Plan;
and each Compensation and Benefit Plan and each trust or other funding medium,
if any, established in connection therewith has at all times been established,
maintained and operated in material
A-14
compliance with its terms and the requirements prescribed by Applicable Law,
including ERISA and the Code.
(c) With respect to those Pension Plans that are intended to be qualified
under Section 401(a) of the Code, except as set forth in Section 3.11(c) of the
Seller Disclosure Schedule, each such Pension Plan is the subject of a current
determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that such
Pension Plan is qualified and exempt from Federal income taxes under Sections
401(a) and 501(a), respectively, of the Code, and no such determination letter
has been revoked nor has any event occurred that could adversely affect such
qualification or exempt status.
(d) At all times on and after the effective date of ERISA, neither Seller
nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any entity which is under "common control" with
the Seller (within the meaning of Section 4001 of ERISA) has maintained,
contributed to or otherwise had any obligation with respect to any
"multiemployer plan" (as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA).
(e) Except as disclosed in Section 3.11(e) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, there are no suits, actions, disputes, claims (other than routine
claims for benefits), arbitrations, administrative or other proceedings pending
or, to the Seller's knowledge, threatened, anticipated or expected to be
asserted with respect to any Compensation and Benefits Plan or any related trust
or other funding medium thereunder or with respect to the Seller or its
Subsidiaries, as the sponsor or fiduciary thereof, or with respect to any other
fiduciary thereof.
(f) No Compensation and Benefit Plan maintained by the Seller or its
Subsidiaries or any related trust or other funding medium thereunder or any
fiduciary thereof is, to the Seller's knowledge, the subject of a material
audit, investigation or examination by any governmental or quasi-governmental
agency.
(g) Except as provided in Section 3.11(g) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, (i) no non-exempt "prohibited transaction" (as such term is used in
Section 4975 of the Code and/or Section 406 of ERISA), has occurred with respect
to any Compensation and Benefit Plan; (ii) neither the Seller nor any of its
Subsidiaries has any commitment, intention or understanding to create,
terminate, amend or adopt any Compensation and Benefit Plan that would result in
any additional liability to the Buyer, the Seller or its Subsidiaries; and (iii)
since the beginning of the current fiscal year of any Compensation and Benefit
Plan, no event has occurred and no condition or circumstance has existed that
could result in a material increase in the benefits under or the expense of
maintaining any Compensation and Benefit Plan from the level of benefits or
expense incurred for the most recently completed fiscal year of such
Compensation and Benefit Plan.
(h) [Intentionally Omitted]
(i) All contributions required to be made under the terms of any
Compensation and Benefit Plan or by law have been timely made. All contributions
made to or under any Compensation and Benefit Plan have been currently
deductible under the Code when made.
(j) Except as provided by this Agreement or in Section 3.11(j) of the
Seller Disclosure Schedule, the execution of, and performance of the
transactions contemplated by, this Agreement will not (either alone or upon the
occurrence of any additional or subsequent events) constitute an event under any
Compensation and Benefit Plan that will or may reasonably be expected to result
in any payment (whether severance pay or otherwise), acceleration, vesting or
increase in benefits with respect to any employee, former employee, officer,
former officer, director or former director of the Seller or its Subsidiaries,
whether or not any such payment would be an "excess parachute payment" (within
the meaning of Section 280G of the Code).
(k) The Seller and its Subsidiaries do not have, and have not had, any
Compensation and Benefit Plans required to be maintained or contributed to by
the law or applicable custom or rule of any jurisdiction outside of the United
States.
(l) Each Compensation and Benefit Plan complies in all material respects
with all applicable requirements of (i) the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
of 1967, as amended, and the regulations
A-15
thereunder and (ii) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and
the regulations thereunder and all other Applicable Laws. All amendments and
actions required to bring each of the Compensation and Benefit Plans into
conformity with all of the applicable provisions of ERISA and other Applicable
Laws have been made or taken except to the extent that such amendments or
actions are not required by law to be made or taken until a date after the
Effective Time and are disclosed in Section 3.11(l) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule.
(m) Each group medical plan sponsored by the Seller or its Subsidiaries
complies in all material respects with the Medicare Secondary Payor Provisions
of Section 1826(b) of the Social Security Act, and the regulations promulgated
thereunder.
(n) Except as set forth on Section 3.11(n) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, the Buyer, as the Surviving Entity, the Seller and its Subsidiaries
may terminate or amend any Compensation and Benefit Plan maintained by the
Seller or its Subsidiaries or may cease contributions to any such Compensation
and Benefit Plans at any time without incurring any material liability.
(o) Each Compensation and Benefit Plan that is a "group health plan" (as
such term is defined in Section 5000(b)(1) of the Code) has been administered
and operated in all material respects in compliance with the applicable
requirements of Part 6 of Title I of ERISA and section 4980B of the Code
("COBRA") and Part 7 of Title I of ERISA; and the Seller and its Subsidiaries
are not subject to any liability, including without limitation, additional
contributions, fines, penalties or loss of tax deduction as a result of such
administration and operation. Except to the extent required by COBRA, no
Compensation and benefit Plan provides health benefits to any current or former
employee, current or former director or beneficiary following the employee's or
director's termination of employment or service.
(p) Neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries has incurred, nor does
the Seller reasonably expect either it or any of its Subsidiaries to incur, any
liability for any Tax, penalty or fee imposed under Sections 4971 through 4980B
of the Code or civil liability under Section 501(i) or (1) of ERISA, and no
event has occurred and no circumstance has existed that could give rise to any
such liability.
(q) Except as provided in Section 3.11(q) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, no insurance policy nor any other contract or agreement affecting any
Compensation and Benefit Plan requires or permits a retroactive increase in
premiums or payments due thereunder.
SECTION 3.12 Labor and Employment Matters. Except as set forth on
Sections 3.12(b) and (f) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule:
(a) No collective bargaining agreement exists that is binding on the Seller
or any of its Subsidiaries, and the Seller has not been officially apprised and
has no knowledge that any petition has been filed or proceeding instituted by an
employee or group of employees of the Seller, or any of its Subsidiaries, with
the National Labor Relations Board seeking recognition of a bargaining
representative.
(b) (i) To the Seller's knowledge, there is no labor strike, dispute, slow
down or stoppage pending or threatened against the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries;
(ii) Other than claims that have been fully resolved in a manner that
did not have a Material Adverse Effect upon Seller and its Subsidiaries,
neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any demand
letters, civil rights charges, suits or drafts of suits with respect to
claims made by any of their respective employees in the last five years;
and
(iii) In the last five years, no employee or former employee has made
a claim, other than claims that were fully resolved on or before September
30, 2003 in a manner that did not have a Material Adverse Effect upon
Seller and its Subsidiaries, that such Person was discharged as a result of
being a so-called "whistle-blower".
(c) Section 3.12(c) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule contains a list
setting forth, as of the date hereof, the name of each officer, employee and
consultant of the Seller or any of the Seller's Subsidiaries, together with such
person's position or function, annual base salary or wages and any incentives or
bonus
A-16
arrangement with respect to such person. The Seller has not received notice that
any such officer or any consultant or employee whose compensation exceeded
$50,000 during the year ended September 30, 2003, will cease to be engaged by
the Seller or such Subsidiary for any reason, other than at the option of the
Seller, including because of the consummation of the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement.
(d) The Seller and each of its Subsidiaries is in compliance in all
material respects with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and
regulations respecting employment, overtime, employment practices, terms and
conditions of employment and wages and hours, in each case, with respect to
employees.
(e) The Seller and each of its Subsidiaries has in all material respects
withheld and reported all amounts required by law or by agreement to be withheld
and reported with respect to wages, salaries and other payments to employees.
(f) To the Seller's knowledge, there are no pending or threatened claims or
actions against the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries under any worker's
compensation policy or long-term disability policy.
(g) No "mass layoff" (as defined in the Worker Adjustment and Retraining
Notification Act of 1988), "plant closing" (as defined in such Act) or similar
event has occurred with respect to the Companies.
SECTION 3.13 Environmental Matters.
(a) Except as disclosed in Section 3.13(a) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule:
(i) Neither the Companies nor, to the best of the Seller's knowledge,
any previous owner, tenant, occupant, operator or user of any of the Real
Property or Former Real Property, has engaged in or permitted any operation
or activity at or upon, or any use or occupancy of, any Real Property or
Former Real Property for the purpose of or in any way involving the
handling, manufacture, treatment, storage, use, generation, release,
refining, reclaiming, recycling, dumping or disposal of any Hazardous
Materials, on, under or in any Real Property or Former Real Property. The
Companies have not transported any Hazardous Materials to, from or across
any Real Property or Former Real Property. No Hazardous Materials currently
are produced or stored on, under or in any Real Property and, to the best
of Seller's knowledge, no Hazardous Materials are produced or stored on,
under or in any Former Real Property or are incorporated in any
construction or, deposited or otherwise located on, under or in any Real
Property or Former Real Property. The foregoing shall not be interpreted to
apply to (A) the handling, storage, transportation, use or sale of
petroleum products to the extent such handling, storage, transportation,
use or sale is lawful and is consistent with the operation of those
petroleum dispensing locations that are included in the assets owned or
leased by the Companies, and (B) the handling, storage, transportation, use
or sale of any substance in a manner that is lawful and is customarily
incidental to the operation of any retail store that is related to any such
petroleum dispensing locations.
(ii) To the best of the Seller's knowledge, no Hazardous Materials
have migrated from any Real Property or Former Real Property to, upon, or
beneath other properties, and, to the best of the Seller's knowledge, no
Hazardous Materials have migrated or threaten to migrate from other
properties to, upon, about or beneath any Real Property or Former Real
Property.
(iii) No underground improvement, including without limitation
treatment or storage tank of water, gas or oil well, is, nor, to the best
of Seller's knowledge, ever has been, located on any Real Property or
Former Real Property, except for basements or as disclosed in Section
3.13(a)(iii) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule.
(iv) To the best of the Seller's knowledge, all Real Property and
Former Real Property and all activities conducted by the Companies on the
Real Property, including without limitation the use, maintenance and
operation of the Real Property and the use, maintenance and operation of
all aboveground and underground storage tanks, currently comply and, at all
times have complied, with all Environmental Requirements.
A-17
(v) Neither the Companies nor, to the best of the Companies'
knowledge, any current or prior owner or occupant of any Real Property or
Former Real Property, has received any notice or other communication
concerning or has knowledge of (A) any violation or alleged violation of
Environmental Requirements material to Buyer's decision to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby individually or in connection with any
other information concerning the environmental condition of the Real
Property or Former Real Property, whether or not corrected, or (B) any
alleged liability for Environmental Damages (as defined below) in
connection with any Real Property or Former Real Property or material
transported to, from or across any Real Property or Former Real Property.
No writ, injunction, decree, order or judgment relating to the foregoing is
outstanding. There is no lawsuit, claim, proceeding, citation, directive,
summons or investigation pending or threatened against any of the Companies
relating to any alleged violation of or liability under any applicable
Environmental Requirements or the presence of any Hazardous Materials.
(vi) To the best of the Seller's knowledge, there has been no
spilling, leaking, pumping, emitting, emptying, discharging, escaping,
leaching, dumping, release, or disposing of any Hazardous Materials into
the environment on or from any Real Property or Former Real Property or by
the Companies.
(vii) There is not and, to the best of Seller's knowledge, has not
been during any period any substance, the presence of which on any Real
Property or Former Real Property causes or caused a nuisance upon any Real
Property or Former Real Property or to any other property or properties.
(viii) There is not and, to the best of Seller's knowledge, has not
been during any period any substance, the presence of which on any other
property or properties constitutes or constituted a trespass by the
Companies.
(ix) All underground storage tanks and piping have been tested for
tightness by a qualified and licensed professional on a date after January
1, 2003 and the results of those tests will provided to Buyer subsequent to
execution of this Agreement.
(b) For purposes of this Agreement:
(i) "Environmental Damages" means all material claims, judgments,
damages, losses, penalties, fines, liabilities (including strict
liability), encumbrances, Liens, costs and expenses of defense of a claim
(whether or not such claim is ultimately defeated), good faith settlements
of judgment, and costs and expenses of reporting, investigating, removing
and/or remediating Hazardous Materials, of whatever kind or nature,
contingent or otherwise, matured or unmatured, foreseeable or
unforeseeable, including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees and
disbursements and consultants' fees, any of which arise out of or relate to
the existence of Hazardous Materials at, upon, or beneath the Real Property
or Former Real Property, migrating or threatening to migrate from the Real
Property or Former Real Property or transported to, from, or across any
Real Property or Former Real Property.
(ii) "Environmental Requirements" means all applicable statutes,
regulations, rules, ordinances, codes, policies, advisories, actions,
licenses, permits, orders, approvals, plans, authorizations, concessions,
franchises and similar items of all federal, state and local governmental
branches, agencies, departments, commissions, boards, bureaus or
instrumentalities having jurisdiction and all applicable judicial and
administrative and regulatory decrees, judgments and orders and all
covenants running with the land that relate to the protection of health or
the environment, including without limitation those that relate to the
existence, handling, manufacture, treatment, storage, use, generation,
release, discharge, refining, recycling, reclaiming or disposal of
Hazardous Materials or the protection of the air, surface water,
groundwater or land or preservation of wetlands, floodplains or other
environmentally sensitive areas.
(iii) "Former Real Property" means any real property in which the
Companies heretofore held but no longer hold a fee, leasehold or other
legal, beneficial or equitable interest.
A-18
(iv) "Hazardous Materials" means any substance: (A) the presence of
which requires reporting, investigation, removal or remediation under any
Environmental Requirement; (B) that is defined as a "hazardous waste,"
"hazardous substance" or "pollutant" or "contaminant" under any
Environmental Requirement; (C) that is toxic, explosive, corrosive,
flammable, ignitable, infectious, radioactive, reactive, carcinogenic,
mutagenic or otherwise hazardous and is regulated under any Environmental
Requirement; (D) the presence of which on any Real Property or Former Real
Property causes a nuisance upon any Real Property or Former Real Property
or to adjacent properties or poses a hazard to the health or safety of
persons on or about any Real Property or Former Real Property; (E) the
presence of which on adjacent properties constitutes a trespass by the
Companies or the Company; (F) that contains gasoline, diesel fuel or other
petroleum hydrocarbons; or (G) that contains PCBs, asbestos or urea
formaldehyde foam insulation.
(c) The Companies have complied in all material respects with all
Environmental Requirements.
(d) The Companies have furnished the Buyer's counsel with true, complete
and correct copies of all claims, complaints, reports, assessments, audits,
investigations and other documents in the possession of or obtainable by the
Companies made by, on behalf of or against the Companies during the past five
(5) years pertaining to Environmental Requirements or Hazardous Materials and
material to Buyer's decision to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby
individually or in connection with any other information concerning the
environmental condition or environmental compliance status of the Companies.
SECTION 3.14 Taxes.
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement:
(i) the term "Tax" (including "Taxes") means (1) all federal, state,
local, foreign and other income, gross receipts, license, payroll,
employment, excise, severance, stamp, business, occupation, premium,
windfall profits, environmental (including taxes under Section 59A of the
Code), capital stock, franchise, profits, withholding, social security (or
similar), unemployment, disability, real property, personal property,
sales, use, transfer, registration, or value added tax, any alternative or
add-on minimum tax, any estimated tax, and any levy, impost, duty,
assessment or withholding, in each case including any interest, penalty, or
addition thereto, whether disputed or not, (2) any liability for payment of
any amount described in clause (1) whether as a result of transferee
liability, of being a member of an affiliated, consolidated, combined or
unitary group for any period, or otherwise through operation of law, and
(3) any liability for the payment of any amount described in clauses (1) or
(2) as a result of any tax sharing, tax indemnity or tax allocation
agreement or any other express or implied agreement to indemnify any other
person;
(ii) the term "Tax Return" means any return, declaration, report,
claim for refund, information return or statement relating to Taxes,
including any schedule or attachment thereto, and including any amendment
thereof, to be filed (whether on a mandatory or elective basis) with any
Governmental Entity responsible for the collection or imposition of Taxes.
(b) Except as set forth in Section 3.14(b) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, the Seller and its Subsidiaries have duly and timely filed all Tax
Returns required to be filed by any of the Seller and its Subsidiaries; and such
Tax Returns are complete and accurate and correctly reflect the Tax liability
required to be reported thereon. Such Tax Returns do not contain a disclosure
statement under Section 6662 of the Code (or any predecessor provision or
comparable provision of state, local or foreign law). Neither the Seller nor any
of its Subsidiaries has engaged in any "listed transaction" as described in
Treasury Regulation sections 1.6011-4(b)(2) or 301.6111-2(b)(2).
(c) The Seller and its Subsidiaries have paid or established adequate
reserves in accordance with GAAP in the financial statements included in the SEC
Reports for all Taxes (whether or not shown on any Tax Return) accrued through
the date of such Seller SEC Reports; all Taxes the Seller and its Subsidiaries
accrued following the end of the most recent period covered by the SEC Reports
have been accrued in the ordinary course of business of the Seller and each such
Subsidiary and have been paid when due in the ordinary course of business; and
no material election has been made with respect to Taxes
A-19
of the Seller or its Subsidiaries in any Tax Returns filed by the Seller and its
Subsidiaries within the past five years. No Lien for Taxes exists with respect
to any asset of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries other than Liens for Taxes
not yet due and payable.
(d) Section 3.14(d) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule lists all of the
federal and state jurisdictions in which the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries
is required to file Tax Returns or pay Taxes. The Seller has made available to
the Buyer true, complete and correct copies of the United States federal, state,
local and foreign income Tax Returns filed by the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries for taxable years ended after December 31, 1996.
(e) Except as set forth in Section 3.14(e) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, no material claim for assessment or collection of Taxes is presently
being asserted against the Seller or its Subsidiaries and neither the Seller nor
any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any pending action, proceeding, or
investigation by any governmental taxing authority nor does the Seller have
knowledge of any such threatened action, proceeding or investigation. Neither
the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries has waived any statute of limitations
with respect to any material Taxes or, to the extent related to such Taxes,
agreed to any extension of time with respect to a Tax assessment or deficiency,
in each case to the extent such waiver or agreement is currently in effect.
(f) Except as set forth in Section 3.14(f) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any
agreement, contract, arrangement or plan that has resulted or would result,
individually or in the aggregate, in connection with this Agreement or any
change of control of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries, in the payment of
any "excess parachute payment" within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code.
(g) Except as set forth in Section 3.14(g) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or bound
by any obligation under any Tax sharing, Tax allocation, Tax indemnity or
similar agreement or arrangement.
(h) Except as set forth in Section 3.14(h) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, there is currently no limitation on the utilization of net operating
losses, built-in losses, tax credits or other similar items of the Seller or its
Subsidiaries under Section 382, 383, 384 or 1502 of the Code and the Treasury
Regulations thereunder (or any similar provision of state, local, or foreign Tax
law).
(i) Except as set forth in Section 3.14(i) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries has agreed to, or is
required to make, any adjustment under Section 481 of the Code by reason of a
change in accounting method.
(j) Neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries are "consenting
corporations" within the meaning of Section 341(f)(1) of the Code.
(k) Neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries is or has been a member
of an affiliated group (within the meaning of Section 1504(a) of the Code)
filing consolidated United States federal income Tax Returns (other than such a
group the common parent of which is or was the Seller).
(l) Neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries has been a party to any
distribution occurring during the last three years in which the parties to such
distribution treated the distribution as one to which Section 355 of the Code
(or any similar provision of state, local or foreign Tax law) applied.
SECTION 3.15 Intellectual Property. Except as set forth in Section 3.15
of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, the Companies own or possess adequate
licenses or other valid rights to use all patents, patent rights, trademarks,
trademark rights, trade names, trade dress, trade name rights, copyrights,
service marks, trade secrets, applications for trademarks and for service marks,
know-how and other proprietary rights and information used or held for use in
connection with the businesses of the Companies ("Intellectual Property") as
currently conducted, and there has not been any written assertion or claim
against the Companies challenging the validity or the use by the Companies of
any of the foregoing. Other than licenses generally available to the public at
reasonable cost and material licenses or rights to use set forth in Section 3.15
of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, to the Seller's knowledge, no material
licenses or other
A-20
valid rights to use any patents, patent rights, trademarks, trademark rights,
trade names, trade dress, trade name rights, copyrights, service marks, trade
secrets, applications for trademarks and for service marks, know-how and other
proprietary rights is necessary for the operation of the business of the
Companies in substantially the same manner as such business is presently
conducted. The conduct of the businesses of the Companies as currently conducted
does not conflict with or infringe upon any patent, patent right, license,
trademark, trademark right, trade dress, trade name, trade name right, service
mark or copyright of any third party. To the Seller's knowledge, there are no
infringements of any of the Intellectual Property owned by or licensed by or to
the Companies and the Intellectual Property is not the subject of any pending
legal proceedings.
SECTION 3.16 Insurance. Except as set forth in Section 3.16 of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule, each of the Seller and its Subsidiaries maintains insurance
policies (the "Insurance Policies") against all risks of a character and in such
amounts as are, to the Seller's knowledge, customarily insured against by
similarly situated companies in the same or similar businesses. Each Insurance
Policy is in full force and effect and is valid, outstanding and enforceable,
and all premiums due thereon have been paid in full. None of the Insurance
Policies will terminate or lapse (or be affected in any other materially adverse
manner) by reason of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Each of
the Seller and its Subsidiaries has complied in all material respects with the
provisions of each Insurance Policy under which it is the insured party. No
insurer under any Insurance Policy has canceled or generally disclaimed
liability under any such policy or, to the Seller's knowledge, indicated in
writing any intent to do so or not to renew any such policy. All material claims
under the Insurance Policies have been filed in a timely fashion. Section 3.16
of the Seller Disclosure Schedule sets forth the amount of the annual premium
most recently paid by the Seller for its directors and officers liability
insurance. The Seller has provided to the Buyer's counsel a true, complete and
correct copy of the Seller's current directors and officers insurance policy.
SECTION 3.17 Certain Business Practices. None of the Seller, any of its
Subsidiaries or, to the Seller's knowledge, any directors, officers, agents or
employees of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries has, on behalf of the Seller
or any of its Subsidiaries, (i) used any funds for unlawful contributions,
gifts, entertainment or other unlawful expenses related to political activity or
(ii) made any other unlawful payment.
SECTION 3.18 Supplies. Section 3.18 of the Seller Disclosure Schedule
sets forth the names of the twenty (20) largest suppliers of the Seller and its
Subsidiaries during the twelve month period ended June 30, 2003. Since June 30,
2003 the Seller has received no written notices of termination or substantial
reduction of business or written threats of termination or substantial reduction
of business from any of such suppliers. The Seller has delivered to the Buyer's
counsel true, complete and correct copies of all supply agreements between any
of the Companies and any of the suppliers listed on Section 3.18 of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule and any other supply agreement pursuant to which the Seller
and its Subsidiaries purchased at least $100,000 worth of goods in the twelve
month period ended June 30, 2003.
SECTION 3.19 Real Property.
(a) Section 3.19(a) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule sets forth the
correct legal description, street address and tax parcel identification number
of each parcel of Owned Real Property. To the extent within the Seller's
possession or control, the Seller has made available to the Buyer true, complete
and correct copies of all deeds, title policies, surveys and other closing
documentation relating to the acquisition by the Seller (or any of the Seller's
Subsidiaries, as the case may be) of such Owned Real Property. To the best of
the Seller's knowledge, except for the Liens set forth in Section 3.19(a) of the
Seller Disclosure Schedule, Permitted Encumbrances and the permitted exceptions
set forth in Section 3.19(a)(a) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule (the
"Permitted Exceptions"), the Companies have good and marketable title to, and
record and beneficial ownership of, all Owned Real Property, subject to no
mortgage, security interest, pledge, Lien, lease, sublease, claim, reversion,
right of entry, easement, access right, encumbrance, charge, or restraint on
alienation whatsoever.
A-21
(b) Except as set forth in Section 3.19(b) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule, there are no parties in possession of any of the Owned Real Property
other than the Companies, and there are no leases, subleases, licenses,
concession agreements or any other rights of possession, occupancy or use of any
of the Owned Real Property which have been granted by the Companies to any third
party or parties, whether by the Companies or by any predecessor in interest of
the Companies. For each parcel of Owned Real Property which is leased to a third
party by the Companies, each such lease is valid, binding and in full force and
effect, and no notice has been given by the Companies, as landlord (or its
managing agent, if any), terminating or canceling any such lease or asserting
that a default or breach exists thereunder. No tenant or other third-party has
any option or right to (i) cancel or terminate any such lease or shorten the
term therein; (ii) remain in possession, extend or lengthen the lease term
beyond December 31, 2010; (iii) purchase any Owned Real Property; or (iv) reduce
the rent to the Companies (or its managing agent, if any) under any such lease.
The Companies (or its managing agent, if any) is not in material default of any
of its obligations under any lease to a third-party.
(c) Section 3.19(c) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule sets forth the
correct legal description (if available), street address and tax parcel
identification number (if available) of all Leased Real Property and, for each
parcel of Leased Real Property, the date on which the current term of the Lease
for such parcel expires and the number of years for which such Lease may be
renewed (in accordance with its terms) beyond such current term. The Seller has
made available to the Buyer true, complete and correct copies of all Leases and
guaranties thereof, together with all related policies of title insurance in the
possession or control of the Companies, and all landlord waivers, subordination
agreements, attornment agreements, nondisturbance agreements, or other
instruments executed and delivered in connection with any of the Leases. All
right, title and interest of the Companies in any Leased Real Property is
reflected in, and evidenced solely by, the Leases. Except as set forth in
Section 3.19(a) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule and except for Permitted
Exceptions and Permitted Encumbrances: (i) to the best of the Seller's knowledge
and subject to the permitted Exceptions, the Companies have good and marketable
title to, and beneficial ownership of, the lessee's leasehold interest in all
Leases for any Leased Real Property, subject to no mortgage, security interest,
pledge, Lien, lease, sublease, claim, reversion, right of entry, easement,
access right, encumbrance, charge, or restraint on alienation whatsoever; (ii)
there are no leases, subleases, licenses, concession agreements or any other
rights of possession, occupancy or use of any portion of Leased Real Property
which have been granted to any third party or parties, whether by the Companies
(or any of them) or by any predecessor in interest of the Companies (or any of
them); and (iii) there are no Persons other than the Companies in possession of
any portion of Leased Real Property which is the subject of a Lease.
(d) Each Lease is valid, binding and in full force and effect, and no
notice has been received from any landlord or managing agent thereunder (each, a
"Landlord") terminating or canceling a Lease or asserting that a default or
breach exists thereunder. Except as listed in Section 3.19(d) of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule, neither any Landlord nor any of the Companies has exercised
any option or right to (i) cancel or terminate any Lease or shorten the term
therein, (ii) lease additional premises in any Leased Real Property, (iii)
reduce or relocate the premises demised by any Lease, or (iv) purchase any
Leased Real Property. Neither the Landlord nor any of the Companies, as tenant,
is in material default of any of their respective obligations under any Lease.
(e) To the best of Seller's knowledge, except as set forth in Schedule
3.19(e)(i) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, all Real Property and improvements
thereon are in compliance in all material respects with all applicable legal
requirements, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to zoning,
building and access for the disabled. Except as set forth on Schedule
3.19(e)(ii) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, the buildings, structures and
equipment included in the Real Property including, without limitation, all
building structural and mechanical systems and roofs, all gasoline and diesel
fuel pumps, and all fuel storage tanks (whether or not underground) have no
material patent or known latent defects, are in good operating condition and
repair, have been reasonably maintained consistent with standards generally
followed in the Companies' industry (giving due account to the age and length of
use of same, and ordinary wear and tear), are suitable for their present uses
and, in the case of buildings and other
A-22
structures, such buildings and other structures (including without limitation,
the roofs thereof) are structurally sound.
(f) To the best of the Seller's knowledge, no part of the Real Property
encroaches on any real property not included in the Real Property, and there are
no buildings, structures, fixtures or other improvements primarily situated on
adjoining property which encroach materially on any part of the Real Property
and the land for each of the Store Premises abuts on and has direct vehicular
access to a public road or has access to a public road via a permanent,
irrevocable, appurtenant easement or right of way or right of access benefiting
such land and comprising a part of the Real Property. The buildings and
structures included in the Real Property have access to water supply, storm and
sanitary sewer facilities, telephone, gas and electrical connections, fire
protection, drainage and other public utilities, as is necessary for the conduct
of the Companies' businesses, and are not located within any flood plain or area
subject to wetlands regulation or any similar restriction. To the best of
Seller's knowledge, there is no existing or proposed plan to modify or realign
any street or highway or any existing or proposed eminent domain proceeding that
would result in the taking of any part of any Real Property to the extent that
such taking would prevent or materially hinder the continued use of any Store
Premises as heretofore used in the conduct of the businesses of the Companies.
(g) None of the Companies has granted to any Person any option, contract or
other agreement with respect to the purchase or sale of any Real Property or any
interest therein (including, but not limited to, any interest in a lease
pertaining to any Leased Real Property).
(h) To the best knowledge of the Seller, there are no pending or
contemplated zoning changes, "floor area ratio" changes, variances, special
zoning exceptions, conditions or agreements materially affecting or which might
reasonably be expected to materially affect any of the Real Property. To the
best knowledge of the Seller, no Real Property (and no current use and condition
thereof) violates any applicable deed restrictions, zoning or subdivision
regulations, or urban redevelopment plans applicable to such Real Property, as
modified by any duly issued variances; no notes or notices of material
violations relating to any Real Property and issued by any Government Entity
have been entered or received by any of the Companies; and the Seller is not
aware of any facts or circumstances which might reasonably be expected to give
rise to any reason to believe that any such notes or notices may or will be
entered. Since January 1, 2000, the Companies have not received (A) any written
notice received by the Companies from any Government Entity regarding any
pending material adverse change in the specific application to any Real Property
of any applicable laws relating to a change in the permitted use of all or any
portion of the Real Property or the respective businesses conducted thereon or
therein, or (B) any written notice from adjacent landowners, lessees or
occupants regarding unrecorded easements and/or agreements or encroachments in
respect of all or any portion of the Real Property.
(i) All Real Property has access to water supply, storm and sanitary sewer
facilities, telephone, gas and electrical connections, fire protection, drainage
and other public utilities supplied directly thereto by facilities of public
utilities, all as is necessary for the conduct of the Companies' respective
businesses.
(j) The Seller has not received written notice of any material default or
breach by any of the Companies under any of the covenants, conditions,
restrictions, rights of way or easements affecting the properties or the
premises covered by any of the Leases or any portion thereof; to the best of the
Seller's knowledge, no such material default or breach now exists; and to the
best of the Seller's knowledge, no event has occurred and is continuing which
with notice or the passage of time would constitute a material default
thereunder.
(k) No work has been performed or is in progress at, and no materials have
been furnished to, any of the Real Property or any portion thereof which, though
not at present the subject of, might reasonably be expected to give rise to,
material mechanic's, materialmen's or other Lens against any of the Companies'
interest in any Real Property.
(l) Since January 1, 2002, to the best of Seller's knowledge, none of the
Companies has received, and the Seller has no knowledge of, any notice or
request from an insurance company or Board of Fire
A-23
Underwriters (or organization exercising functions similar thereto), or from any
Landlord or from any servicing agent in respect of any mortgage affecting any
Real Property, requesting the performance of any material work or alteration
with respect to any Real Property.
SECTION 3.20 Personal Property.
(a) Section 3.20 of the Seller Disclosure Schedule sets forth the
Companies' Depreciation Proof Listing for the five weeks ended September 30,
2003, which listing is accurate and complete. The Seller has made available to
the Buyer true, complete and correct copies of all instruments, agreements and
other documents in its possession evidencing, creating or constituting Liens on
the personal property owned, leased or licensed by the Companies (the "Personal
Property"), a list of which Liens is set forth in Section 3.20(a) of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule. Except for the Liens listed in Section 3.20(a) of the
Seller Disclosure Schedule and Permitted Encumbrances, the Companies have good
title to, or a valid lease or license interest in, all of the Companies'
Personal Property, subject to no mortgage, security interest, pledge, Lien,
lease, claim, encumbrance or charge, or restraint on transfer whatsoever.
(b) Each item of tangible Personal Property is suitable for immediate use
in the ordinary course of business, is free from material patent defects and
conforms in all material respects to all Applicable Laws, ordinances, codes,
rules or regulations applicable to the Companies and relating to their
construction, use and operation. No item of tangible Personal Property is in
need of repair or replacement other than as part of routine maintenance in the
ordinary course of business. Except as disclosed in Section 3.20(b) of the
Seller Disclosure Schedule, all tangible Personal Property used in the
Companies' businesses is in the possession of the Companies.
(c) Subject to reserves and allowances taken into effect in determining the
inventory reflected in the most recent balance sheet included in the Previously
Filed SEC Reports, the Companies' inventory consists in all material respects of
items of a quality and quantity usable or saleable in the ordinary course of the
Companies' business.
(d) Section 3.20(d) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule lists each lease by
which the Companies lease any Personal Property, other than (i) leases
terminable without cost on not more than 90 days' notice and (ii) leases under
which the aggregate amount of rental payments remaining to be paid are less than
$25,000.
SECTION 3.21 Material Contracts. Except as set forth in Section 3.21 of
the Seller Disclosure Schedule, the Companies have no oral or written (i)
employment, severance or collective bargaining or similar agreement with or
relating to any employee or any consulting, brokerage or agency agreement not
terminable without cost on no more than 90 days' notice, (ii) agreement or
arrangement with any officer or director, (iii) agreements, plans or
arrangements providing for any bonus, stock option, stock ownership, stock
purchase, stock appreciation right, pension or retirement benefit, vacation,
insurance or other employee benefit, (iv) agreements, contracts, indentures or
other instruments relating to the borrowing of money or the guarantee of any
obligation for the borrowing of money or to the grant of any mortgage, lien,
security interest or other encumbrance in or on any material portion of its
property, (v) leases of, or contracts for installment or other deferred purchase
or sale of, any personal property requiring payments in excess of $50,000 per
year or $100,000 over the remaining term of the lease or contract, (vi) licenses
of any patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret or other intellectual
property, (vii) agreements or arrangements for the future purchase or delivery
of goods or rendition of service in excess of $50,000 per year or $100,000 over
the remaining term of the agreement, including without limitation any such
agreement or arrangement with any customer of or supplier to the Companies,
(viii) franchise agreements, (ix) dealer agreements, (x) agreements providing
for the termination of franchise relationships, (xi) agreements which restrict
the right of the Companies to compete, (xii) agreements which restrict the right
of third-parties to compete or (xiii) other contracts, agreements or
arrangements which do or may have a material impact on the Companies. The
Companies are not parties to any agreement which has had a Material Adverse
Effect, or is anticipated to have a Material Adverse Effect, on Seller. True,
complete and correct copies of all written, and true and complete summaries of
the material terms of all oral, agreements, arrangements, plans and other
instruments referred to in Section 3.21 of the Seller Disclosure
A-24
Schedule (the "Contracts", it being understood that the term "Contracts" shall
also include all real estate leases heretofore furnished by the Seller to the
Buyer) have been provided to the Buyer's counsel. Except as set forth in Section
3.21 of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, to the knowledge of Seller, no event has
occurred which constitutes, and execution of this Agreement and consummation of
the Merger will not constitute, a default or an occurrence which gives rise to a
right of acceleration, termination or any similar right by any party (or would,
but for the passage of time or the giving of notice, constitute a default or
result in such a right of acceleration, termination or similar right) under any
Contract. Section 3.21A of the Seller Disclosure Schedule describes the extent
to which each of the Lenders has waived defaults which currently exist under any
loan or credit agreements applicable to the Companies and the extent to which
each such lender has agreed that it will waive or defer covenant defaults which
arise on or after the date hereof; copies of all such waivers and agreements
have been delivered to the Buyer's counsel prior to the date hereof. Section
3.21B of the Seller Disclosure Schedule lists, for each Lender, Lessor and
Vendor, any written agreements that exist between such Lender, Lessor or Vendor
and the Companies.
SECTION 3.22 Vote Required. The affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the Shares is the only vote of the holders of any class or series of
the Seller's capital stock necessary to approve and adopt this Agreement and the
Merger.
SECTION 3.23 Opinion of Financial Adviser. Contemporaneously with the
execution hereof, Boenning & Scattergood, Inc. (the "Financial Advisor") has
delivered to the Seller a written opinion to the effect that the consideration
to be paid to the holders of the Shares hereunder is fair to such holders from a
financial point of view. A true, complete and correct copy of such written
opinion has been delivered to the Buyer.
SECTION 3.24 Brokers. Except as set forth in Section 3.24 of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule, no broker, finder or investment banker is entitled to any
brokerage, finder's or other fee or commission in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement based upon arrangements made by or
on behalf of the Seller. A true, complete and correct copy of each engagement
agreement with any broker, finder or investment banker identified in Section
3.24 of the Seller Disclosure Schedule has been provided to the Buyer's counsel.
SECTION 3.25 Takeover Statutes. No "fair price," "moratorium," "control
share" or other similar anti-takeover statute or regulation under the laws of
any state (each, a "Takeover Statute") is applicable to the Seller, the Shares,
the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The
Seller's Board has approved the Merger and this Agreement, and such approval is
sufficient to render inapplicable to the Merger and this Agreement the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement under the provisions of Section 203
of the DGCL to the extent, if any, such Section is applicable to the Merger,
this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
SECTION 3.26 Representations Complete. None of the representations or
warranties made by the Seller in this Agreement nor any statement made in any
Schedule or certificate furnished by the Seller pursuant to this Agreement, or
furnished in or in connection with documents mailed or delivered to the
stockholders of the Seller in connection with soliciting their proxy or consent
to this Agreement and the Merger, contains or will contain at the Effective
Time, any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits or will omit at the
Effective Time to state any material fact necessary in order to make the
statements contained herein or therein, in the light of the circumstances under
which made, not misleading.
A-25
ARTICLE 4
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE BUYER
The Buyer hereby represents and warrants to the Seller as follows:
SECTION 4.1 Organization.
(a) The Buyer is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and has all requisite power
and authority to own, lease and operate its properties and to carry on its
business as now being conducted.
(b) The Buyer is duly qualified or licensed and in good standing to do
business in each jurisdiction in which the property owned, leased or operated by
it or the nature of the business conducted by it makes such qualification or
licensing necessary, except in such jurisdictions where the failure to be so
duly qualified or licensed and in good standing would not, individually or in
the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Buyer.
(c) The Buyer does not have any Subsidiaries.
SECTION 4.2 Authority Relative to this Agreement. The Buyer has all
necessary limited liability company power and authority to execute and deliver
this Agreement, to perform its obligations under this Agreement and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of
this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have
been duly and validly authorized by the managers or members of the Buyer, and no
other limited liability company proceedings on the part of the Buyer are
necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and
delivered by the Buyer and constitutes, assuming the due authorization,
execution and delivery hereof by the Seller, a valid, legal and binding
agreement of the Buyer enforceable against the Buyer in accordance with its
terms, subject to any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization,
moratorium or similar laws now or hereafter in effect relating to creditors'
rights generally or to general principles of equity.
SECTION 4.3 Information Supplied. None of the information supplied or to
be supplied by the Buyer for inclusion or incorporation by reference in the
Proxy Statement will at the date mailed to stockholders and at the times of the
meeting or meetings of stockholders of the Seller to be held in connection with
the Merger contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein in light of the circumstances under which they are made not
misleading.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Buyer does not make any representation,
warranty or covenant with respect to any information supplied or required to be
supplied by the Seller that is contained in or omitted from the Proxy Statement.
SECTION 4.4 Consents and Approvals; No Violations. Except for filings,
permits, authorizations, consents and approvals as may be required under
applicable requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, state
securities or blue sky laws, Pennsylvania licensing laws applicable to sellers
of tobacco products and the filing and recordation of the Certificate of Merger
as required by the DGCL, no material filing with or notice to, and no material
permit, authorization, consent or approval of any Governmental Entity is
necessary for the execution and delivery by the Buyer of this Agreement or the
consummation by the Buyer of the transactions contemplated hereby. Neither the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Buyer nor the
consummation by the Buyer of the transactions contemplated hereby will (a)
conflict with or result in any breach of any provision of the Certificate of
Formation or Operating Agreement of the Buyer, (b) result in a violation or
breach of or constitute (with or without due notice or lapse of time or both) a
default (or give rise to any right of termination, amendment, cancellation or
acceleration or Lien) under any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any
material note, bond, mortgage, indenture, lease, license, contract, agreement or
other instrument or obligation to which the Buyer is a party or by which the
Buyer or its properties and assets is bound or (c) violate any material
A-26
order, writ, injunction, decree, law, statute, rule or regulation applicable to
the Buyer or any of its properties or assets.
SECTION 4.5 Litigation. There is no suit, claim, action, arbitration,
proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the Buyer,
threatened, against the Buyer or any of its properties or assets before any
Governmental Entity in any case which would, if adversely determined, have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Buyer, or that could reasonably be expected to
prevent or delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement beyond the Final Date. The Buyer is not subject to any outstanding
order, writ, injunction or decree that could reasonably be expected to prevent
or delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.
SECTION 4.6 [Intentionally Omitted]
SECTION 4.7 Interim Operations of Buyer. Buyer was formed solely for the
purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated hereby and has not engaged
in any business activities or conducted any operations other than in connection
with the transactions contemplated hereby.
SECTION 4.8 Brokers. No broker, finder or investment banker is entitled
to any brokerage, finder's or other fee or commission in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement based upon arrangements made by or
on behalf of the Buyer or its Subsidiaries.
SECTION 4.9 Representations Complete. None of the representations or
warranties made by the Buyer in this Agreement nor any statement made in any
Schedule or certificate furnished by the Buyer pursuant to this Agreement, or
furnished by the Buyer in writing in connection with documents mailed or
delivered to the stockholders of the Seller in connection with soliciting their
proxy or consent to this Agreement and the Merger, contains or will contain at
the Effective Time, any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits or will
omit at the Effective Time to state any material fact necessary in order to make
the statements contained herein or therein, in the light of the circumstances
under which made, not misleading.
SECTION 4.10 Financing. As of the date of Closing, the Buyer will have
sufficient cash available or have borrowing facilities that are sufficient to
enable it to consummate the Merger, to pay the entire Merger Consideration
(other than the Merger Consideration that is payable to holders of Shares who,
as of the Effective Time, are obligated to contribute their right to receive the
Merger Consideration directly or indirectly to Buyer) and all of its other fees
and expenses related thereto and to fulfill its other obligations under this
Agreement and all related agreements.
ARTICLE 5
COVENANTS
SECTION 5.1 Conduct of Business of the Companies. Except as contemplated
by this Agreement, during the period from the date hereof to the Effective Time,
the Seller will and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to (a) conduct its
operations in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and,
to the extent consistent therewith, with no less diligence and effort than would
be applied in the absence of this Agreement, (b) use all reasonable efforts not
to take any action that would make any of the representations or warranties of
the Seller contained in this Agreement untrue or incorrect in any material
respect (or, with respect to representations and warranties that are qualified
with respect to materiality, in any respect); and (c) use all commercially
reasonable efforts to preserve intact its current business organizations, keep
available the service of its current officers and employees and preserve its
relationships with customers, suppliers, distributors, lessors, creditors,
employees, contractors and others having business dealings with it with the
intention that its goodwill and ongoing businesses shall be unimpaired at the
Effective Time. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, except as
otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or in Section 5.1 of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule, prior to the
A-27
Effective Time, neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries shall, without
the prior written consent of the Buyer:
(a) amend its Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws (or other similar
governing instrument);
(b) authorize for issuance, issue, sell, deliver or agree or commit to
issue, sell or deliver (whether through the issuance or granting of
options, warrants, convertible securities, commitments, subscriptions,
rights to purchase or otherwise) any stock of any class or any other debt
or equity securities or equity equivalents (including any stock options or
stock appreciation rights) except for the issuance and sale of Shares
pursuant to Seller Stock Options outstanding on the date hereof (but only
to the extent that such Seller Stock Options are accurately described in
Section 3.2(a) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule);
(c) split, combine or reclassify any shares of its capital stock,
declare, set aside or pay any dividend or other distribution (whether in
cash, stock or property or any combination thereof) in respect of its
capital stock, make any other actual, constructive or deemed distribution
in respect of its capital stock or otherwise make any payments to
stockholders in their capacity as such, or redeem or otherwise acquire any
of its securities or any securities of any of its Subsidiaries, except as
may be required under the terms of any Seller Stock Option;
(d) adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution,
merger, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other
reorganization of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries (other than the
Merger);
(e) alter through merger, liquidation, reorganization, restructuring
or any other fashion the corporate structure of any Subsidiary of the
Seller;
(f) (i) incur or assume any long-term or short-term debt or issue any
debt securities except, in each case, for borrowings under existing lines
of credit in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
or modify or agree to any material amendment of the terms of any of the
foregoing except as set forth in Section 5.1(f) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule; (ii) assume, guarantee, endorse or otherwise become liable or
responsible (whether directly, contingently or otherwise) for the
obligations of any other Person except for obligations of Subsidiaries of
the Seller incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice; (iii) make any loans, advances or capital contributions to or
investments in any other Person (other than in accordance with Section
5.1(m)(vii) and to Subsidiaries of the Seller or customary loans or
advances to employees in each case in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice); (iv) pledge or otherwise subject to any
Lien shares of capital stock of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries; or
(v) mortgage or pledge any of its material assets, tangible or intangible,
or create or suffer to exist any material Lien thereupon;
(g) except as may be required by Applicable Law or this Agreement,
enter into, adopt, amend or terminate any bonus, special remuneration,
profit sharing, compensation, severance, termination, stock option, stock
appreciation right, restricted stock, performance unit, stock equivalent,
stock purchase, pension, retirement, deferred compensation, employment,
health, life, or disability insurance, dependent care, severance or other
employee benefit plan, agreement, trust, fund or other arrangement for the
benefit or welfare of any former or current director, officer, employee or
consultant in any manner or (except as provided in Section 5.1(g) of the
Seller Disclosure Schedule) increase in any manner the compensation or
fringe benefits of any former or current director, officer, employee or
consultant or pay any benefit not required by any plan or arrangement as in
effect as of the date hereof (including the granting of stock appreciation
rights or performance units);
(h) grant any severance or termination pay to any former or current
director, officer, employee or consultant, except payments made (i)
pursuant to written agreements outstanding on the date hereof or the
current severance policies of the Seller described on Section 3.11(a) of
the Seller Disclosure Schedule, the terms of which are in all material
respects truly, completely and correctly
A-28
disclosed in Section 3.11(a) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, or (ii) as
required by applicable federal, state or local law or regulations;
(i) exercise its discretion to, or otherwise voluntarily, accelerate
the vesting of any Seller Stock Option as a result of the Merger, any other
"change in control" of the Seller (as defined in the Compensation and
Benefit Plans) or otherwise (but nothing herein shall limit the accelerated
vesting of Seller Stock Options as required under any applicable plan
disclosed to the Buyer prior to its execution of this Agreement);
(j) except as set forth in Section 5.1(j) of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule or as provided in this paragraph below, (i) sell, lease, license,
transfer or otherwise dispose of any material assets in any single
transaction or series of related transactions (including in any transaction
or series of related transactions having a fair market value in excess of
$100,000 in the aggregate), other than sales of its products in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practices, (ii) enter into
any exclusive license, distribution, marketing, sales or other agreement or
sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any Intellectual Property, or (iii)
license or franchise any stores to any third party. The parties hereto
recognize that the Company has been contemplating a fundamental transaction
such as the sale of a significant number of convenience stores or other
assets, a refinancing or sale/lease-back transaction. The Company plans to
continue to pursue this initiative between the date hereof and Closing,
provided that it may not enter into any binding agreement relating to a
fundamental transaction without (i) the Buyer's prior written consent (such
consent not to be unreasonably withheld) and (ii) any contractual
obligations arising from such a transaction which will survive Closing
(such as a lease of properties) being assignable to Buyer.
(k) except as may be required as a result of a change in law or in
generally accepted accounting principles, change any of the accounting
principles, practices or methods used by it;
(l) revalue in any material respect any of its assets, including
writing down the value of inventory or writing-off notes or accounts
receivable, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice or as required by generally accepted accounting principles;
(m) (i) except as set forth in Section 5.1(m)(i) of the Seller
Disclosure Schedule, acquire (by merger, consolidation or purchase of stock
or assets) any corporation, partnership or other Person or division thereof
or any equity interest therein; (ii) enter into or terminate any contract
or agreement that would be material to the Seller and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole; (iii) amend, modify or waive any material right under any
material contract of the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries; (iv) modify its
standard warranty terms for its products or amend or modify any product
warranties in effect as of the date hereof in any material manner that is
adverse to the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries; (v) authorize any new
capital expenditure or expenditures that are not set forth in Section
5.1(m)(v) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule; (vi) acquire any stores; or
(vii) acquire any other asset or related group of assets, or make any
investment, in a single transaction or series of related transactions, with
a cost in excess of $50,000, provided that in no event shall the aggregate
of all such acquisitions and investments exceed $100,000;
(n) make any material tax election or settle or compromise any
material income tax liability or, except as set forth in Section 5.1(n) of
the Seller Disclosure Schedule, permit any insurance policy naming it as a
beneficiary or loss-payee to expire, or to be canceled or terminated,
unless a comparable insurance policy reasonably acceptable to the Buyer is
obtained and in effect;
(o) fail to file any Tax Returns when due or fail to cause such Tax
Returns when filed to be complete and accurate in all material respects;
(p) fail to pay any Taxes or other material debts when due;
(q) settle or compromise any pending or threatened suit, action or
claim that (i) relates to the transactions contemplated hereby or (ii) the
settlement or compromise of which would involve more than $50,000 or would
otherwise be material to the Seller and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
A-29
(r) take any action or fail to take any action that could reasonably
be expected to (i) limit the utilization of any of the net operating
losses, built-in losses, tax credits or other similar items of the Seller
or its Subsidiaries under Sections 382, 383, 384 or 1502 of the Code and
the Treasury Regulations thereunder, or (ii) cause any transaction in which
the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries was a party that was intended to be
treated as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code to fail to
qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code;
(s) enter into any transaction or arrangement with any Person
associated with the Companies of the type which is required to be disclosed
pursuant to Item 404 of the SEC's Regulation S-K; or
(t) take or agree in writing or otherwise to take any of the actions
described in Sections 5.1(a) through 5.1(s).
SECTION 5.2 No Solicitation or Negotiation.
(a) The Seller shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries and other Affiliates
and their respective officers, other employees with managerial responsibilities,
directors, representatives (including the Financial Advisor or any other
investment banker and any attorneys and accountants) and agents to, immediately
cease any discussions or negotiations with any other Persons with respect to any
Third Party Acquisition. Neither the Seller nor any of its Subsidiaries and
other Affiliates shall, nor shall the Seller authorize or permit any of its or
their respective officers, directors, employees, representatives or agents to,
directly or indirectly, encourage, solicit, participate in or initiate
discussions or negotiations with or provide any information to any Person or
group (other than the Buyer or any designees of the Buyer) concerning any Third
Party Acquisition or proposal or offer relating thereto; provided, however, that
if the Board of Directors of the Seller determines in good faith, after
consultation with legal counsel, that it is necessary to do so in order to
comply with its fiduciary duties to the Seller's stockholders under the DGCL,
the Seller may, in response to a proposal or offer for a Third Party Acquisition
that was not solicited (i) furnish information only of the type and scope with
respect to the Seller and its Subsidiaries that the Seller provided to the Buyer
prior to the date hereof to any such Person pursuant to a customary
confidentiality agreement substantially the same as the confidentiality
agreement executed by the Buyer's manager prior to the execution of this
Agreement and (ii) participate in discussions and negotiations regarding such
proposal or offer; provided, further, nothing herein shall prevent the Seller's
Board from taking and disclosing to the Seller's stockholders a position
contemplated by Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act with
regard to any tender or exchange offer. The Seller shall promptly (and in any
event within twenty-four hours after becoming aware thereof) (i) notify the
Buyer in the event that the Seller or any of its Subsidiaries or other
Affiliates or any of their respective officers, directors, employees,
representatives or agents receives any proposal or inquiry concerning a Third
Party Acquisition, including the terms and conditions thereof and the identity
of the party submitting such proposal, and any request for confidential
information in connection with a potential Third Party Acquisition, (ii) provide
the Buyer with a copy of any written agreements, proposals or other materials
the Seller receives from any such person or group (or its representatives), and
(iii) advise the Buyer of the status of such negotiations from time to time and
at any time upon the Buyer's request, and promptly following any developments
concerning the same.
(b) Except as set forth in this Section 5.2(b), the Seller's Board shall
not withdraw or modify its recommendation of the transactions contemplated
hereby or approve or recommend, or cause or permit the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries to enter into any agreement or obligation with respect to, any
Third Party Acquisition. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Seller Board by a
majority vote determines in its good faith judgment, after consultation with and
based upon the advice of legal counsel and the Financial Advisor, that it is
required to do so in order to comply with its fiduciary duties under the DGCL,
the Seller Board may withdraw its recommendation of the transactions
contemplated hereby or approve or recommend a Superior Proposal, but in each
case only (i) after providing written notice to the Buyer (a "Notice of Superior
Proposal") advising the Buyer that the Seller Board has received a Superior
Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal
and identifying the person or group making such Superior Proposal and (ii) if
the Buyer does not, within five (5) business days after the Buyer's receipt of
the Notice of Superior Proposal, make an offer that the Seller Board by a
majority vote
A-30
of the entire Seller Board determines in its good faith judgment (based on the
advice of the Financial Advisor or another financial advisor of nationally
recognized reputation) to be at least as favorable to the Seller's stockholders
as such Superior Proposal; provided, however, that the Seller shall not be
entitled to enter into any agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal unless
and until (w) this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 7.1, (x) the
Seller has paid (by wire transfer in same day funds) all amounts due to the
Buyer pursuant to Section 7.3, (y) the Seller has agreed with the Buyer that it
will not provide to any third party any work product developed by the Buyer with
respect to business concepts applicable to the Seller's businesses and (z) the
Buyer has received written acknowledgment from the Seller and from each other
party to the Third Party Acquisition that the Seller and each other party to the
Third Party Acquisition have irrevocably waived any right to contest such
payment. Any disclosure that the Seller Board may be compelled to make with
respect to the receipt of a proposal for a Third Party Acquisition or otherwise
in order to comply with its fiduciary duties or Rules 14d-9 or 14e-2 will not
constitute a violation of this Agreement; provided, however, that such
disclosure states that no action will be taken by the Seller Board in violation
of this Section 5.2(b).
(c) For purposes of this Agreement, "Third Party Acquisition" means the
occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the acquisition of the Seller by
merger, stock purchase or otherwise by any Person (which includes a "person" as
such term is defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) other than the
Buyer or any Affiliate thereof (a "Third Party"); (ii) the acquisition by a
Third Party of any material portion of the assets (which shall include ten
percent (10%) or more of the assets or more than five (5) stores) of the Seller
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than the sale of its products in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices and other than in
a Sale Leaseback Transaction as provided for in Article 8 hereof; (iii) the
acquisition by a Third Party of fifteen percent (15%) or more of the outstanding
Shares; (iv) the adoption by the Seller of a plan of liquidation or the
declaration or payment of an extraordinary dividend; (v) the repurchase by the
Seller or any of its Subsidiaries of more than ten percent (10%) of the
outstanding Shares; or (vi) the acquisition by the Seller or any of its
Subsidiaries by merger, purchase of stock or assets, joint venture or otherwise,
of a direct or indirect ownership interest or investment in any business (or
businesses) whose annual revenues, net income or assets is equal to or greater
than ten percent (10%) of the annual revenues, net income or assets of the
Seller and its Subsidiaries, respectively. For purposes of this Agreement, a
"Superior Proposal" means any bona fide proposal (1) to acquire, directly or
indirectly, for consideration consisting solely of cash and/or securities, all
of the Shares then outstanding, or all or substantially all the assets of the
Seller and its Subsidiaries, (2) that contains terms that the Seller Board by a
majority vote determines in its good faith judgment (based, as to the financial
terms, on the written advice of the Financial Advisor or another financial
advisor of nationally recognized reputation) to be more favorable to the
Seller's stockholders than the Merger, (3) that the Seller Board by a majority
vote determines in its good faith judgment (following and based on consultation
with the Financial Adviser or another financial advisor of nationally recognized
reputation and its legal and other advisors) to be reasonably capable of being
completed (taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory and other
aspects of the proposal and the Person making the proposal), (4) that does not
contain any "due diligence" condition other than any due diligence condition set
forth in this Agreement (it being understood that (x) if the Buyer agrees to
waive any due diligence condition set forth herein prior to termination of this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(c)(iv), such due diligence condition shall be
deemed not to be a provision set forth in this Agreement for purposes of this
Section 5.2(c) and (y) if the Third Party then makes a similar waiver, the Third
Party shall not be deemed to have imposed the due diligence conditions so waived
by the Third Party) and (5) that the Seller Board by a majority vote determines
to be fully financed (it being understood that this clause (5) shall apply only
in the event that the Buyer demonstrates, after receipt of notice of a proposed
Third Party Acquisition and prior to termination of this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(c)(iv), that it has cash resources at least equal to the Aggregate
Merger Consideration or that it has received a commitment from a financially
viable source to supply such cash resources upon consummation of the Merger.
A-31
SECTION 5.3 Meeting of Stockholders.
(a) The Seller shall promptly take all actions necessary in accordance with
the DGCL and its Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws to duly call, give
notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its stockholders as promptly as
practicable to consider and vote upon the adoption and approval of this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby (the "Meeting"). The
stockholder vote required for the adoption and approval of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement shall be the vote described in Section 3.22. The
Seller will, through the Seller Board, recommend to its stockholders approval of
the Merger and this Agreement, subject to the provisions of Section 5.2(b). The
Seller shall promptly prepare and, after reasonably considering any comments
that the Buyer and its advisors may make, file with the SEC the Proxy Statement
for the solicitation of a vote of the holders of Shares approving the Merger,
which, subject to the provisions of Section 5.2(b), shall include the
recommendation of the Seller Board that stockholders of the Seller vote in favor
of the approval and adoption of this Agreement and the Merger and the written
opinion of the Financial Advisor that the consideration to be received by the
stockholders of the Seller pursuant to this Agreement is fair to such
stockholders from a financial point of view. Upon receipt of any oral or written
comments from the SEC with respect to the Proxy Statement, the Seller shall
cause its counsel to disclose such comments to the Buyer's counsel and to
cooperate with the Buyer in responding to the SEC as promptly as practicable. In
the event that the Seller's Board withdraws its recommendation pursuant to
Section 5.2(b), the Seller shall nevertheless be required to convene and conduct
the Meeting in accordance with this Section 5.3, unless this Agreement is
terminated prior to the Meeting pursuant to Section 7.1. The Seller shall use
all reasonable efforts to have the Proxy Statement cleared by the SEC as
promptly as practicable after such filing, and promptly thereafter mail the
Proxy Statement to the stockholders of the Seller. Whenever any event occurs
which is required to be set forth in an amendment or supplement to the Proxy
Statement, the Seller will promptly inform the Buyer of such occurrence,
reasonably consider any comments that the Buyer and its advisors may make and
cooperate in filing with the SEC or its staff or any other government officials,
and/or mailing to stockholders of the Seller, such amendment or supplement.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, the Seller
may adjourn or postpone (i) the Meeting to the extent necessary to ensure that
any necessary supplement or amendment to the Proxy Statement is provided to the
Seller's stockholders in advance of a vote on the Merger and this Agreement or
(ii) the time for which the Meeting is originally scheduled (as set forth in the
Proxy Statement), if there are insufficient Shares represented, either in person
or by proxy, to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct the business of the
Meeting.
(b) The Buyer agrees to vote any Shares owned by the Buyer in favor of this
Agreement and the Merger.
SECTION 5.4 Access to Information.
(a) Between the date hereof and the Effective Time, upon reasonable notice
subject in each instance to the requirements of Applicable Law, the Seller will
give the Buyer and its authorized representatives reasonable access to all
employees, stores, offices and other facilities and to all books and records and
personnel files of current employees of the Seller and its Subsidiaries as the
Buyer may reasonably require, including without limitation all books, records
and reports relating to environmental, health, safety and related matters, and
will cause its officers and those of its Subsidiaries to furnish the Buyer with
such financial, environmental and operating data and other information with
respect to the business and properties of the Seller and its Subsidiaries as the
Buyer may from time to time reasonably request. Between the date hereof and the
Effective Time, the Buyer shall make available to the Seller, as reasonably
requested by the Seller, a designated officer of the Buyer to answer questions
and make available such information regarding the Buyer as is reasonably
requested by the Seller taking into account the nature of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) Between the date hereof and the Effective Time, the Seller shall
furnish to the Buyer (i) within two (2) business days following preparation
thereof (and in any event within ten (10) business days after the end of each
calendar month, commencing with January, 2004), an unaudited consolidated
balance
A-32
sheet as of the end of such month and the related unaudited consolidated
statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the month then
ended, without notes to such financial statements, (ii) within two (2) business
days following preparation thereof (and in any event within ten (10) business
days after the end of each fiscal quarter), an unaudited consolidated balance
sheet as of the end of such quarter and the related unaudited consolidated
statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the quarter then
ended, with condensed notes to such financial statements, and (iii) within two
(2) business days following preparation thereof (and in any event within ninety
(90) calendar days after the end of each fiscal year), an audited consolidated
balance sheet as of the end of such year and the related audited consolidated
statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then
ended, all of such financial statements referred to in clauses (i), (ii) and
(iii) to be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
in conformity with the practices consistently applied by the Seller with respect
to such consolidated financial statements. All the foregoing shall be in
accordance with the books and records of the Seller and its Subsidiaries and
shall fairly present their consolidated financial position (taking into account
the differences between the monthly, quarterly and annual financial statements
prepared by the Seller in conformity with its past practices) as of the last day
of the period then ended and its consolidated results of operations and cash
flows for the applicable period.
SECTION 5.5 Certain Filings; Reasonable Efforts.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions herein provided, including Section
5.2(b), each of the parties hereto agrees to use all reasonable efforts to take
or cause to be taken all action and to do or cause to be done all things
reasonably necessary, proper or advisable under Applicable Law to consummate and
make effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including using
all reasonable efforts to do the following, (i) cooperate in the preparation and
filing of the Proxy Statement and any amendments thereto; (ii) obtain consents
of all third parties and Governmental Entities necessary, proper, advisable or
reasonably requested by the Buyer or the Seller, for the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; (iii) contest any legal proceeding
challenging the Merger; and (iv) execute any additional instruments necessary to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, the Buyer and Seller agree to use all reasonable
efforts to cause the Effective Time to occur as soon as practicable after the
Meeting. The Seller agrees to use all reasonable efforts to encourage its
employees to accept any offers of employment extended by the Buyer. If at any
time after the Effective Time any further action is necessary to carry out the
purposes of this Agreement, the proper officers and directors of each party
hereto shall take all such necessary action.
(b) The Buyer and the Seller will consult and cooperate with one another,
and consider in good faith the views of one another, in connection with any
analyses, appearances, presentations, letters, white papers, memoranda, briefs,
arguments, opinions or proposals made or submitted by or on behalf of any party
hereto in connection with any proceedings before any Governmental Entity
relating to this Agreement or the Merger.
(c) The Buyer will reasonably cooperate in good faith with Seller in
Seller's efforts to obtain the consents required in Section 6.3(e) it being
understood, however, that neither Buyer, the Surviving Entity, not any of their
respective direct or indirect members shall be required to accept any terms,
conditions or obligations that are more onerous or burdensome than those
currently applicable to Seller and its shareholders.
SECTION 5.6 Public Announcements. Neither the Buyer nor the Seller shall
issue any press release or otherwise make any public statements with respect to
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the Merger, or any
Third Party Acquisition, without the prior consent of the Buyer (in the case of
the Seller) or the Seller (in the case of the Buyer), except (i) as may be
required by Applicable Law, court process or by the rules and regulations of, or
pursuant to any agreement with, any self-regulatory body, provided that the
disclosing party offers the other party the opportunity to comment on the press
release or public statement to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, such
rules and regulations or such agreement, whichever is applicable, (ii) following
a change, if any, of the Seller Board's recommendation of the Merger (in
accordance with Section 5.2(b)) or (iii) only in the case of a release or
statement
A-33
relating to a Third Party Acquisition, if the Seller Board has been advised by
outside legal counsel that a press release or other public statement is required
by Applicable Law.
SECTION 5.7 Indemnification and Directors' and Officers' Insurance.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, the Surviving Entity shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless (and shall advance expenses as incurred to
the fullest extent permitted under Applicable Law), to the extent not covered by
insurance, each person who is now or has been prior to the date hereof or who
becomes prior to the Effective Time an officer or director of the Seller (the
"Indemnified Persons") against (i) all losses, claims, damages, costs, expenses
(including counsel fees and expenses), settlement payments or liabilities
arising out of or in connection with any claim, demand, action, suit, proceeding
or investigation based in whole or in part on or arising in whole or in part out
of the fact that such person is or was an officer or director of the Seller,
whether or not pertaining to any matter existing or occurring at or prior to the
Effective Time and whether or not asserted or claimed prior to or at or after
the Effective Time ("Indemnified Liabilities"); and (ii) all Indemnified
Liabilities based in whole or in part on or arising in whole or in part out of
or pertaining to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, in each
case to the same extent as such Persons are indemnified for such matters under
the Seller's Certificate of Incorporation and by-laws. Nothing contained herein
shall make the Buyer, the Seller or the Surviving Entity an insurer, a
co-insurer or an excess insurer in respect of any insurance policies which may
provide coverage for Indemnified Liabilities, nor shall this Section 5.7 relieve
the obligations of any insurer in respect thereto. Each Indemnified Person is
intended to be a third party beneficiary of this Section 5.7 and may
specifically enforce its terms. This Section 5.7 shall not limit or otherwise
adversely affect any rights any Indemnified Person may have under any agreement
with the Seller or under the Seller's Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws as
presently in effect.
(b) From and after the Effective Time, the Surviving Entity shall fulfill
and honor in all respects the obligations of the Seller pursuant to any
indemnification agreements between the Seller and its directors and officers as
of or prior to the date hereof and any indemnification provisions under the
Seller's Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws as in effect immediately prior
to the Effective Time. The Surviving Entity's aggregate obligation to indemnify
and hold harmless all Indemnified Persons for all matters to which such
Indemnified Persons may be entitled to be indemnified or held harmless under
subsections (a) and (b) of this Section 5.7 shall in no event exceed the
Seller's net worth as of September 30, 2003.
(c) For a period of six years after the Effective Time, the Buyer, as the
Surviving Entity, will maintain in effect directors' and officers' liability
insurance covering those persons who, as of immediately prior to the Effective
Time, are covered by the Seller's directors' and officers' liability insurance
policy (the "Insured Parties") on terms no less favorable to the Insured Parties
than (i) those of the Seller's present directors' and officers' liability
insurance policy and (ii) those provided by Buyer to its own managers and
officers; provided that, in lieu of maintaining such existing insurance as
provided above, the Buyer, at its election, may cause coverage to be provided
under any policy maintained for the benefit of the Buyer, so long as the terms
are not less advantageous to the intended beneficiaries thereof than such
existing insurance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (a) the Buyer shall not be
obligated to pay annual premiums to insure the Insured Parties in excess of 150%
of the annual premium most recently paid by the Seller prior to the date hereof
for directors' and officers' liability insurance (as set forth in Section 3.15
of the Seller Disclosure Schedule) and (b) the Buyer shall be deemed to have
satisfied all of its obligations under this Section 5.7(c) in the event that it
acquires single premium tail insurance at an aggregate premium cost not to
exceed 300% of the annual premium most recently paid by the Seller prior to the
date hereof (as set forth in Section 3.15 of the Seller Disclosure Schedule).
(d) Neither the Buyer nor any of its Affiliates shall be obligated to
guarantee the payment or performance of the Seller's obligations under
subsection (a) or (b) of this Section 5.7, so long as (i) the Surviving Entity
honors such obligations to the extent of the Seller's net worth at September 30,
2003, and (ii) the Buyer and its Affiliates do not take any action (or omit to
take any action) to cause the Surviving Entity to contravene this Section 5.7.
A-34
SECTION 5.8 Notification of Certain Matters. The Seller shall give prompt
notice to the Buyer, and the Buyer shall give prompt notice to the Seller, of
(i) the occurrence or nonoccurrence of any event the occurrence or nonoccurrence
of which has caused or would be likely to cause any representation or warranty
contained in this Agreement by such first party to be untrue or inaccurate in
any material respect (or, with respect to representations and warranties
qualified as to materiality, in any respect) at or prior to the Effective Time
and (ii) any material failure by such first party to comply with or satisfy in
any material respect any covenant, condition or agreement to be complied with or
satisfied by it hereunder; provided, however, that the delivery of any notice
pursuant to this Section 5.8 shall not cure such breach or non-compliance or
limit or otherwise affect the remedies available hereunder to the party
receiving such notice.
SECTION 5.9 Additions to and Modification of Seller Disclosure
Schedule. Concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the
Seller has delivered a Seller Disclosure Schedule that includes all of the
information required by the relevant provisions of this Agreement. In addition,
the Seller shall deliver to the Buyer such additions to or modifications of any
Sections of the Seller Disclosure Schedule necessary to make the information set
forth therein true, complete and correct in all material respects as soon as
practicable after such information is available to the Seller after the date of
execution and delivery of this Agreement. If an addition to or modification of
any Section of the Seller Disclosure Schedule corrects a matter which absent
correction would give rise to a material breach of any representation or
warranty, then Buyer shall have the right within fifteen (15) days of notice of
such addition or modification to terminate this Agreement, with such termination
being Buyer's sole remedy for the material breach of representation or warranty
that would continue to exist but for such correction. Notwithstanding any other
provision hereof but subject to the immediately preceding sentence, each
addition to or modification of any Section of the Seller Disclosure Schedule
will be effective to cure and correct for all purposes any breach of any
representation, warranty or covenant relating to the Seller Disclosure Schedule
not having read at all times as so supplemented or modified; provided, however,
that each time the Seller delivers to the Buyer an addition or modification to a
Seller Disclosure Schedule, the Buyer shall have a new fifteen (15) day period
in which to terminate this Agreement if the addition or modification, considered
either individually or together with previously delivered additions or
modifications to the Seller Disclosure Schedule, correct a matter which absent
correction would give rise to a material breach of any representation or
warranty.
SECTION 5.10 Seller Employees; Plans. The Seller agrees to provide the
Buyer with, and to cause each of its Subsidiaries to provide the Buyer with,
reasonable access to its employees during normal working hours following the
date of this Agreement, to, among other things, deliver offers of continued
employment and to provide information to such employees about the Buyer and its
plans. If requested by the Buyer, the Seller shall take such action as is
necessary and appropriate to terminate the Uni-Marts, Inc. Retirement Savings &
Incentive Plan as of one minute prior to the Effective Time. If the Buyer makes
any such request, it shall review the suitability of adopting a benefit plan to
replace the Uni-Marts, Inc. Retirement Savings & Incentive Plan. Any such
actions shall be subject to the advance review and approval of Buyer. Any trust
or other funding arrangement established by the Companies with respect to any
executive compensation arrangement shall be subject to the advance review and
approval of Buyer. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein,
this Agreement shall not confer on any employee of Seller or any Subsidiary of
Seller any right with respect to employment by Buyer, the Surviving Entity or
any of their respective Affiliates.
SECTION 5.11 Takeover Statutes. If any Takeover Statute or any similar
statute, law, rule or regulation in any State of the United States (including
under the DGCL or any other law of the State of Delaware) is or may become
applicable to the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, the Seller and the Seller Board shall promptly grant such approvals
and use all reasonable efforts to take such lawful actions as are necessary so
that the Merger and such transactions may be consummated as promptly as
practicable on the terms contemplated by this Agreement, and use all reasonable
efforts to otherwise take such lawful actions to eliminate or minimize the
effects of such statute, law, rule or regulation, on such transactions.
A-35
SECTION 5.12 Financial Certificate. At least three business days prior to
the anticipated Closing Date, the Seller shall deliver to the Buyer (i) a
certificate (the "Financial Certificate"), executed by the Seller's chief
executive officer and chief financial officer and in form reasonably
satisfactory to the Buyer, setting forth (x) the amount of the Companies'
consolidated cash as of the Last Month End, determined in accordance with GAAP
(the "Final Cash Amount"), (y) a reasonably detailed calculation of the
Companies' Net Operating Assets as of the Last Month End (the "Final Net
Operating Assets Amount") and (z) a reasonably detailed calculation of the
Companies' EBITDA for the twelve months ended on the Last Month End (the "Final
EBITDA Amount") and (ii) such back-up as Buyer shall reasonably request to
analyze the statements made in the Financial Certificate.
ARTICLE 6
CONDITIONS TO CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER
SECTION 6.1 Conditions to Each Party's Obligations to Effect the
Merger. The respective obligations of each party hereto to effect the Merger
are subject to the satisfaction at or prior to the Effective Time of the
following conditions:
(a) this Agreement shall have been approved and adopted by the requisite
vote of the stockholders of the Seller;
(b) no statute, rule, regulation, executive order, decree, ruling or
injunction shall have been enacted, entered, promulgated or enforced (and remain
in effect) by any United States federal or state court or United States federal
or state Governmental Entity that prohibits, restrains, enjoins or restricts the
consummation of the Merger;
(c) any governmental or regulatory notices, approvals or other requirements
necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and to operate the
business of the Seller and its Subsidiaries after the Effective Time in all
material respects as it was operated prior thereto shall have been given,
obtained or complied with, as applicable; and
(d) the Proxy Statement shall have been cleared by the SEC and shall not be
the subject of any stop order.
SECTION 6.2 Conditions to the Obligations of the Seller. The obligation
of the Seller to effect the Merger is subject to the satisfaction at or prior to
the Effective Time of the following conditions:
(a) the representations and warranties of the Buyer contained in this
Agreement shall be true, complete and correct in all material respects (or, as
to representations and warranties that are qualified as to materiality, in all
respects) at and as of the date hereof and at and as of the Effective Time with
the same effect as if made at and as of the Effective Time (except to the extent
such representations specifically relate to an earlier date, in which case such
representations shall be true, complete and correct in all material respects
(or, as to representations and warranties that are qualified as to materiality,
in all respects) as of such earlier date, and, at the Closing, the Buyer shall
have delivered to the Seller a certificate to that effect, executed by two (2)
officers or managers of the Buyer; and
(b) each of the covenants and obligations of the Buyer to be performed at
or before the Effective Time pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall have
been duly performed in all material respects at or before the Effective Time
and, at the Closing, the Buyer shall have delivered to the Seller a certificate
to that effect, executed by two (2) officers or managers of the Buyer.
SECTION 6.3 Conditions to the Obligations of the Buyer. The obligations
of the Buyer to effect the Merger are subject to the satisfaction at or prior to
the Effective Time of the following conditions:
(a) the representations and warranties of the Seller contained in this
Agreement shall be true, complete and correct in all material respects (or, as
to representations and warranties that are qualified as to materiality, in all
respects) as of the date hereof and at and as of the Effective Time with the
same effect as if made at and as of the Effective Time (except to the extent
such representations specifically
A-36
relate to an earlier date, in which case such representations shall be true,
complete and correct in all material respects (or, as to representations and
warranties that are qualified as to materiality, in all respects) as of such
earlier date, and, at the Closing, the Seller shall have delivered to the Buyer
a certificate to that effect, executed by two (2) executive officers of the
Seller;
(b) each of the covenants and obligations of the Seller to be performed at
or before the Effective Time pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall have
been duly performed in all material respects at or before the Effective Time
and, at the Closing, the Seller shall have delivered to the Buyer a certificate
to that effect, executed by two (2) executive officers of the Seller;
(c) since September 30, 2003, there shall have been no events, changes or
effects, individually or in the aggregate, with respect to the Seller or its
Subsidiaries that constitute a Material Adverse Effect on the Seller and, at the
Closing, the Seller shall have delivered to Buyer a certificate to that effect,
executed by two executive officers of the Seller;
(d) in connection with obtaining the consents and estoppel certificates
described in Section 6.3(e), the Buyer shall not be (i) required, or be
construed to be required, to sell or divest any assets or business or to
restrict any business operations in order to obtain the consent or successful
termination of any review of any such Governmental Entity regarding the
transactions contemplated hereby or (ii) prohibited from owning, and no material
limitation shall be imposed on the Buyer's ownership of, any material portion of
the business or assets of the Seller and its Subsidiaries;
(e) the Buyer shall have received from each Lender an estoppel certificate,
in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Buyer, to the effect that
to the knowledge of such Lender, the Companies are not in default under any
agreement between such Lender and the Company, other than defaults which,
pursuant to the agreement described in Section 3.21A of the Seller Disclosure
Schedule or pursuant to a waiver or consent delivered by Provident Bank (as a
Lender) at or prior to the date of the Closing, will not give rise to
acceleration of any indebtedness, payment of any damages or termination of any
agreement; Provident Bank (as a Lender) shall have agreed not to exercise any
remedies with respect to defaults under its credit agreement with the Companies
for a period of 90 days after the Closing; and the Buyer shall have received all
consents (in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Buyer) and
licenses (excluding licenses customarily obtained after a change in control of
licensee, such as tobacco, lottery and liquor licenses) from Governmental
Entities and other third-parties which the Buyer shall reasonably determine to
be necessary in order to effect the Merger and to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby, including without limitation (I) consents from each Lender
which has the right to accelerate the time when any indebtedness is payable by
the Companies by virtue of the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby (including without limitation any change between the management of the
Seller prior to the Effective Time and the management of the Surviving Entity),
(II) consents from each Lessor which has entered into any lease with the
Companies that provides or contemplates that consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby (including without limitation any change between the
management of the Seller prior to the Effective Time and the management of the
Surviving Entity) requires the consent or approval of such Lessor, (III)
consents from each vendor (including each Vendor but excluding vendors which, in
the aggregate, sold less than $1,200,000 in products or services to the
Companies during the twelve months ended September 30, 2003) which has entered
into any agreement with the Companies that provides or contemplates that
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby (including without
limitation any change between the management of the Seller prior to the
Effective Time and the management of the Surviving Entity) requires the consent
or approval of such vendor and (IV) consents from any other party to each of the
agreements listed in Section 3.6 of the Seller Disclosure Schedule;
(f) [Intentionally Omitted]
(g) [Intentionally Omitted]
(h) as of the completion of the Meeting, either no holders of Shares shall
have notified the Seller that they intend to exercise dissenters' rights or
holders of Shares representing less than fifteen percent
A-37
(15%) of the outstanding Shares shall have notified the Seller that they intend
to exercise dissenters' rights;
(i) [Intentionally Omitted]
(j) [Intentionally Omitted]
(k) [Intentionally Omitted]
(l) the Seller shall have delivered to the Buyer a certification of the
non-foreign status of the Seller and its Subsidiaries, in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to the Buyer, in accordance with U.S. Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1445-2(b)(2); and
(m) the Final Cash Amount determined in accordance with Section 5.12 shall
be at least $4.0 million, the Final Net Operating Assets Amount determined in
accordance with Section 5.12 shall be at least $6.0 million and Final EBITDA
Amount determined in accordance with Section 5.12 shall be at least $11.0
million.
Article 7
TERMINATION; AMENDMENT; WAIVER
SECTION 7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger
may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time whether before or after
approval and adoption of this Agreement by the Seller's stockholders:
(a) by mutual written consent of the Buyer and the Seller;
(b) by the Buyer or the Seller if (i) any court of competent jurisdiction
in the United States or other United States federal or state Governmental Entity
shall have issued a final order, decree or ruling, or taken any other final
action, restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the Merger and such
order, decree, ruling or other action is or shall have become nonappealable or
(ii) the Merger has not been consummated by the Final Date; provided, however,
that no party may terminate this Agreement pursuant to this clause (ii) if such
party's failure to fulfill any of its obligations under this Agreement shall
have been a principal reason that the Effective Time shall not have occurred on
or before said date;
(c) by the Seller if (i) there shall have been a breach of any
representations or warranties on the part of the Buyer set forth in this
Agreement or if any representations or warranties of the Buyer shall have become
untrue such that, in either such instance, the conditions set forth in Section
6.2(a) would be incapable of being satisfied by the Final Date; (ii) there shall
have been a breach in any material respect by the Buyer of any of its covenants
or agreements hereunder, and the Buyer has not cured such breach within ten (10)
business days after notice by the Seller thereof; (iii) the Seller shall have
convened the Meeting and shall have failed to obtain the requisite vote of its
stockholders at such Meeting (including any adjournments thereof); or (iv) the
Seller Board shall have received a Superior Proposal, the Seller shall have
complied with the provisions of Section 5.2(b), the Buyer shall have received
the acknowledgment contemplated by Section 5.2(b), the Seller shall have
provided the agreements contemplated by Section 5.2(b) and the Seller shall have
made the payments called for by Section 2.13(b) and Section 7.3(a);
(d) by the Buyer if (i) there shall have been a breach of any
representations or warranties on the part of the Seller set forth in this
Agreement or if any such representations or warranties of the Seller shall have
become untrue such that, in either such instance, the conditions set forth in
Section 6.3(a) would be incapable of being satisfied by the Final Date; (ii)
there shall have been a breach in any material respect by the Seller of one or
more of its covenants or agreements hereunder, and the Seller has not cured such
breach within ten (10) business days after notice by the Buyer thereof or there
shall have been any breach in any material respect by any party to any of the
Stockholder Agreements; (iii) the Seller Board shall have recommended to the
Seller's stockholders a Superior Proposal; (iv) the Seller Board shall have
withdrawn or adversely modified its approval or recommendation of this Agreement
or
A-38
the Merger or shall have failed to confirm in writing such recommendation within
five (5) business days after the Buyer requests such confirmation; (v) the
Seller Board shall have ceased using all reasonable efforts to call, give notice
of, or convene or hold the Meeting as promptly as practicable or shall have
adopted a resolution not to effect any of the foregoing; or (vi) the Seller
shall have convened the Meeting and the Seller shall have failed to obtain the
requisite vote of its stockholders at such Meeting (including any adjournments
thereof); or
(e) by the Buyer if the conditions in Sections 6.3(h), 6.3(l) or 6.3(m)
shall not have been satisfied.
SECTION 7.2 Effect of Termination. In the event of the termination and
abandonment of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1, this Agreement shall
forthwith become void and have no effect without any liability on the part of
any party hereto or its Affiliates, managers, members, directors, officers or
stockholders other than the provisions of this Section 7.2 and Sections 2.13,
5.2(b), 7.3, 7.6 and 7.7. Nothing contained in this Section 7.2 shall relieve
any party from liability for any breach of any covenant or representation in
this Agreement prior to such termination, it being understood that the liability
of the Buyer for any such breach is limited by Section 7.7.
SECTION 7.3 Fees and Expenses; Alternative Arrangements.
(a) In the event that this Agreement shall be terminated pursuant to:
(i) Section 7.1(c)(iv) or 7.1(d)(iii), (iv) or (v);
(ii) Section 7.1(d)(i) or (ii) and, at the time of such termination,
there is outstanding an offer by a Third Party to consummate, or a Third
Party shall have publicly announced (and not withdrawn) a plan or proposal
with respect to, a Third Party Acquisition and such Third Party Acquisition
occurs within twelve (12) months after the date on which this Agreement has
been terminated; or
(iii) Section 7.1(c)(iii) or 7.1(d)(vi) and, at the time of the
Meeting at which the Seller failed to obtain the requisite vote, there is
outstanding an offer by a Third Party to consummate, or a Third Party shall
have publicly announced (and not withdrawn) a plan or proposal with respect
to, a Third Party Acquisition and such Third Party Acquisition occurs
within twelve (12) months after the date on which this Agreement has been
terminated;
the Buyer would suffer direct and substantial damages, which damages
cannot be determined with reasonable certainty. To compensate the Buyer for
such damages, the Seller shall pay to the Buyer immediately upon the
occurrence of the event described in this Section 7.3(a) giving rise to
such damages by wire transfer of immediately available funds, the amount of
eight hundred thousand dollars ($800,000) in liquidated damages (it being
specifically agreed that such amount represents liquidated damages and not
a penalty) (the "Fee").
(b) Except as specifically provided in this Section 7.3, each party shall
bear its own expenses in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby. The Seller hereby waives any right to set-off or
counterclaim against the Fee paid pursuant to this Section 7.3.
(c) The parties acknowledge that the agreements contained in this Article 7
(including this Section 7.3) are an integral part of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and that, without these agreements, the parties
would not enter into this Agreement. Accordingly, if any party fails promptly to
pay the amounts required pursuant to Section 7.3 when due (including
circumstances where, in order to obtain such payment a party commences a suit
that results in a final nonappealable judgment against another party for such
amounts), the defaulting party shall pay to the other party (i) its costs and
expenses (including attorneys' fees) in connection with such suit and (ii)
interest on the amount that was determined to be due and payable hereunder at
the rate announced by Citibank as its "reference rate" in effect on the date
such payment was required to be made.
(d) [Intentionally Omitted]
A-39
SECTION 7.4 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by action taken by
the Seller and the Buyer at any time before or after approval of the Merger by
the stockholders of the Seller but after any such approval no amendment shall be
made that requires the approval of such stockholders under Applicable Law
without such approval. This Agreement (including, subject to Section 5.9, the
Seller Disclosure Schedule) may be amended only by an instrument in writing
signed on behalf of the parties hereto.
SECTION 7.5 Extension; Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time,
each party hereto may (i) extend the time for the performance of any of the
obligations or other acts of the other party, (ii) waive any inaccuracies in the
representations and warranties of the other party contained herein or in any
document, certificate or writing delivered pursuant hereto or (iii) waive
compliance by the other party with any of the agreements or conditions contained
herein. Any agreement on the part of any party hereto to any such extension or
waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument, in writing, signed on
behalf of such party. The failure of any party hereto to assert any of its
rights hereunder shall not constitute a waiver of such rights.
SECTION 7.6 Tender Offer. In the event that (i) the condition set forth
in Section 6.3(h) is not satisfied and (ii) Buyer exercises its right under
Section 7.1(e) to terminate this Agreement, then, promptly thereafter, Buyer
shall commence a tender offer to purchase all of the outstanding Shares at a
price equal to the Merger Consideration, subject to the condition (which may be
waived by Buyer) that at least a majority of the outstanding Shares on a fully
diluted basis be validly tendered (the "Minimum Condition") and subject to such
other conditions as are customary in such a transaction. Notwithstanding any
provision herein to the contrary, the provisions of this Section 7.6 shall
survive the termination of this Agreement. The following provisions shall apply
to any tender offer commenced by the Buyer pursuant to this Section 7.6:
(a) Unless the Board of Directors of Seller determines (on the advice of
counsel) that it is prohibited by law (including principles of fiduciary duty)
from doing so, concurrently with the commencement of such tender offer the
Seller shall file with the SEC and mail to the holders of Shares a
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 (the "Schedule 14D-9"),
which shall reflect a recommendation to tender all Shares to the Buyer.
(b) The Seller agrees that such Schedule 14D-9, including all amendments
and supplements thereto, shall (i) in all material respects, comply with the
requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder and
other applicable laws; (ii) include all information required by Rule 14f-1 of
the Exchange Act; and (iii) not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading; provided, however, that the foregoing
representation shall not apply with respect to the accuracy of information
furnished in writing by the Buyer specifically for inclusion in the Schedule
14D-9. None of the information furnished in writing or confirmed in writing by
the Seller for inclusion in the tender offer documents utilized by the Buyer
will contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made,
not misleading.
(c) The Buyer and its counsel shall be given an opportunity to review the
Schedule 14D-9 prior to its being filed with the SEC. The Seller agrees promptly
to correct any information provided by it for use in the Schedule 14D-9 if and
to the extent that it shall have become false or misleading in any material
respect.
(d) The Seller will promptly furnish the Buyer with mailing labels
containing the names and addresses of the record holders of Shares and lists of
securities positions of Shares held in stock depositories, each as of a recent
date, and shall furnish the Buyer with such additional information (including
updated lists of shareholders, mailing labels and lists of securities positions)
and assistance as the Buyer may reasonably request to communicate its offer to
the shareholders of the Seller.
A-40
(e) In the event that (x) Shares representing at least a majority of the
outstanding Shares on a fully diluted are not submitted for Buyer's purchase
pursuant to such tender offer (it being understood that any shareholder that
revokes any submission shall not be deemed to have submitted such shareholder's
Shares), (y) during the pendency of such tender offer, there is outstanding an
offer by a Third Party to consummate, or a Third Party shall have publicly
announced (and not withdrawn) a plan or proposal with respect to, a Third Party
Acquisition and such Third Party Acquisition occurs within twelve (12) months
after the date on which this Agreement has been terminated, the Seller shall pay
to Buyer, upon consummation of such Third Party Acquisition, all Reimbursable
Costs. For purposes of this Section 7.6(e), the term "Reimbursable Costs" shall
mean the lesser of (x) one million dollars ($1,000,000) and (y) all
out-of-pocket costs, fees and expenses (including fees payable to counsel,
accountants, financial advisors and other experts and advisors) of the Buyer
incident to the creation of Buyer and any entity formed for the purpose of
investing in Buyer, the negotiation, preparation and execution of this Merger
Agreement (including but not limited to the cost of negotiations and
documentation by any previous entity that Buyer has agreed to reimburse) and any
tender offer made by the Buyer pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the
related documentation and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby (as evidenced by invoices or other reasonable documentation of payment of
such costs, fees and expenses).
SECTION 7.7 Maximum Damages. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the
contrary, the maximum damages recoverable by the Seller and its Subsidiaries
from the Buyer with respect to any breach by the Buyer of any warranty,
representation or covenant set forth herein shall be $800,000 (the "Ceiling
Amount"). The Buyer warrants that it has cash resources in an amount equal to
the Ceiling Amount and will maintain cash resources equal to the Ceiling Amount
unless and until (x) the Effective Time occurs or (y) this Agreement is
terminated by the Buyer and/or the Seller for any reason other than as a result
of any breach of any warranty, representation or covenant by the Buyer (in which
case the obligations of the Buyer to pay any portion of the Ceiling Amount to
the Seller shall terminate upon resolution of any such breach claim).
ARTICLE 8
MISCELLANEOUS
SECTION 8.1 Non-survival of Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties made herein shall not survive beyond the
termination of this Agreement or beyond the Effective Time. This Section 8.1
shall not limit any covenant or agreement of the parties hereto that by its
terms requires performance after the Effective Time.
SECTION 8.2 Entire Agreement; Assignment. This Agreement (including the
Seller Disclosure Schedule, which is incorporated by reference into this
Agreement) and each Stockholder's Agreement executed by a stockholder of the
Seller (a) constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto with
respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all other prior and
contemporaneous agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between
the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and (b) shall not be
assigned by operation of law or otherwise; provided, however, that the Buyer may
assign any or all of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any
wholly owned subsidiary of the Buyer, but no such assignment shall relieve the
Buyer of its obligations hereunder if such assignee does not perform such
obligations.
SECTION 8.3 Validity. If any provision of this Agreement or the
application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or
unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such
provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and to
such end the provisions of this Agreement are agreed to be severable.
SECTION 8.4 Notices. All notices and other communications pursuant to
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if delivered
personally, telecopied, sent by nationally-recognized overnight courier or
mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested), postage
prepaid, to
A-41
the parties at the addresses set forth below or to such other address as the
party to whom notice is to be given may have furnished to the other parties
hereto in writing in accordance herewith. Any such notice or communication shall
be deemed to have been delivered and received (i) in the case of personal
delivery, on the date of such delivery, (ii) in the case of telecopier, on the
date sent if confirmation of receipt is received and such notice is also
promptly mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested),
(iii) in the case of a nationally-recognized overnight courier in circumstances
under which such courier guarantees next business day delivery, on the next
business day after the date when sent and (iv) in the case of mailing, on the
third business day following that on which the piece of mail containing such
communication is posted:
if to the Buyer:
Green Valley Acquisition Co., LLC
c/o Ara Kervandjian and
Paul Levinsohn
477 East Beaver Avenue
State College, PA 16801-5696
Telecopier: (814) 234-3277
with a copy to:
McCausland, Keen & Buckman
259 N. Radnor-Chester Road
Suite 160
Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087
Telecopier: 610-341-1099
Attention: Robert H. Young, Jr.,
if to the Seller to:
Henry Sahakian
Uni-Marts, Inc.
477 East Beaver Avenue
State College, PA 16801-5696
Telecopier: (814) 234-3277
and to
Steve Krumholz
225 Lakeside Drive
Malakoff, TX 75148
Telecopier: (972) 378-7831
with a copy to:
Saul Ewing LLP
1200 Liberty Ridge Drive
Suite 200
Wayne, PA 19087
Telecopier: 610-408-4401
Attention: David Antzis
Rhoads & Sinon LLP
One South Market Square, 12th Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1146
Telecopier: 717-231-6669
Attention: Charles J. Ferry
or to such other address as the person to whom notice is given may have
previously furnished to the others in writing in the manner set forth above.
A-42
SECTION 8.5 Governing Law and Venue; Waiver of Jury Trial.
(a) THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE MADE IN AND IN ALL RESPECTS SHALL
BE INTERPRETED, CONSTRUED AND GOVERNED BY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICT OF LAW PRINCIPLES
THEREOF. The parties hereby irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of the courts
of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Pennsylvania solely in respect of the interpretation and
enforcement of the provisions of this Agreement and of the documents referred to
in this Agreement, and in respect of the transactions contemplated hereby, and
hereby waive, and agree not to assert, as a defense in any action, suit or
proceeding for the interpretation or enforcement hereof or of any such document,
that it is not subject thereto or that such action, suit or proceeding may not
be brought or is not maintainable in said courts or that the venue thereof may
not be appropriate or that this Agreement or any such document may not be
enforced in or by such courts, and the parties hereto irrevocably agree that all
claims with respect to such action or proceeding shall be heard and determined
in such a Pennsylvania State or Federal court. The parties hereby consent to and
grant any such court jurisdiction over the person of such parties and over the
subject matter of such dispute and agree that mailing of process or other papers
in connection with any such action or proceeding in the manner provided in
Section 8.4 or in such other manner as may be permitted by Applicable Law, shall
be valid and sufficient service thereof.
(b) The parties agree that irreparable damage would occur and that the
parties would not have any adequate remedy at law in the event that any of the
provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with their
specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the
parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of
this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this
Agreement in any Federal court located in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or in
Pennsylvania state court, this being in addition to any other remedy to which
they are entitled at law or in equity.
(c) EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY WHICH MAY ARISE
UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND
THEREFORE EACH SUCH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES ANY
RIGHT SUCH PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION
DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE
TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND
ACKNOWLEDGES THAT (i) NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY
HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE
EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER, (ii) EACH SUCH PARTY
UNDERSTANDS AND HAS CONSIDERED THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WAIVER, (iii) EACH SUCH
PARTY MAKES THIS WAIVER VOLUNTARILY, AND (iv) EACH SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN INDUCED
TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE WAIVERS AND
CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION 8.5.
SECTION 8.6 Descriptive Headings; Article and Section References. The
descriptive headings herein are inserted for convenience of reference only and
are not intended to be part of or to affect the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement. All Article, Section, Subsection and Schedule references in this
Agreement are to Articles, Sections, subsections and Schedules, respectively, of
or to this Agreement or the Seller Disclosure Schedule, unless specified
otherwise.
SECTION 8.7 Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon and
inure solely to the benefit of each party hereto and its successors and
permitted assigns and, except as expressly provided herein, including in
Sections 5.7 and 8.2, nothing in this Agreement is intended to or shall confer
upon any other person any rights, benefits or remedies of any nature whatsoever
under or by reason of this Agreement.
A-43
SECTION 8.8 Personal Liability. This Agreement shall not create or be
deemed to create or permit any personal liability or obligation on the part of
any direct or indirect stockholder of the Seller or any member of the Buyer or
any manager, officer, director, employee, agent, representative or investor of
any party hereto.
SECTION 8.9 Specific Performance. The parties hereby acknowledge and
agree that the failure of any party to perform its agreements and covenants
hereunder, including its failure to take all actions as are necessary on its
part to the consummation of the Merger, will cause irreparable injury to the
other parties, for which damages, even if available, will not be an adequate
remedy. Accordingly, each party hereby consents to the issuance of injunctive
relief by any court of competent jurisdiction to compel performance of such
party's obligations and to the granting by any court of the remedy of specific
performance of its obligations hereunder; provided, however, that if a party
hereto receives any payment or reimbursement of expenses pursuant to Section
7.3, it shall not be entitled to specific performance to compel the consummation
of the Merger.
SECTION 8.10 Counterparts; Facsimiles. This Agreement may be executed in
one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but
all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement. Facsimile signatures
shall be deemed to be original signatures for all purposes hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Agreement to be
duly executed on its behalf as of the day and year first above written.
UNI-MARTS, INC.
By: /s/ HENRY SAHAKIAN
------------------------------------
Name: Henry Sahakian
Title: Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ STEVE KRUMHOLZ
------------------------------------
Name: Steve Krumholz
Title: Chairman of the Ad Hoc
Committee
GREEN VALLEY ACQUISITION CO., LLC
BY: /s/ ARA M. KERVANDJIAN
------------------------------------
NAME: ARA M. KERVANDJIAN
TITLE: MANAGER
BY: /s/ PAUL LEVINSOHN
------------------------------------
NAME: PAUL LEVINSOHN
TITLE: MANAGER
A-44
ANNEX B
The following form of Tender and Voting Agreement was executed by each of
the following Stockholders: Henry D. Sahakian, Daniel D. Sahakian, Ara
Kervandjian, Armen D. Sahakian, Alex D. Sahakian, Ludmila Sahakian, Seda
Sahakian, Lara Sahakian, Fred Sahakian, Heddy Kervandjian, Green Valley
Acquisition Co., LLC, HFL Corporation, KOTA Management Co., L.L.C., Paul
Levinsohn and Raj Vakharia.
TENDER AND VOTING AGREEMENT
THIS VOTING AGREEMENT, dated as of January 26, 2004, is between Green
Valley Acquisition Co., LLC ("Buyer"), a Pennsylvania limited liability company,
and the undersigned stockholder (the "Stockholder").
WHEREAS, Buyer and Uni-Marts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Company"),
intend to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement")
contemporaneously herewith, pursuant to which Company will merge (the "Merger")
with and into Buyer;
WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, Stockholder owns (either beneficially or of
record) or otherwise controls the number of shares of the Company's Common Stock
("Common Stock"), indicated on the signature page of this Agreement (all such
shares, and any shares hereafter acquired by Stockholder prior to the
termination of this Agreement being referred to herein as the "Shares"); and
WHEREAS, as a condition to Buyer's willingness to enter into the Merger
Agreement and proceed with the Merger, Buyer has required that Stockholder agree
and, in order to induce Buyer to enter into the Merger Agreement and proceed
with the Merger, Stockholder has agreed to enter into this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as
follows:
1. No Inconsistent Arrangements. Until the Termination Date (defined
below), Stockholder shall not (a) sell, transfer, pledge, assign or otherwise
dispose of, or enter into any contract, option or other arrangement with respect
to the sale, transfer, pledge, assignment or other disposition of, any of the
Shares to any person; or (ii) deposit any of the Shares into escrow, a voting
trust or a voting agreement or grant a proxy with respect to any of the Shares,
except as provided in this Agreement. For the purposes of this Agreement,
"Termination Date" means the earlier to occur of (i) the date and time of any
valid termination of the Merger Agreement pursuant its terms (other than a
termination effected by Buyer in connection with the Offer (as defined in the
Merger Agreement) contemplated by Buyer pursuant to Section 7.6 of the Merger
Agreement), or (ii) the date and time of effectiveness of the Merger in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement.
2. Voting Agreement. Until the Termination Date, at any meeting of the
stockholders of Company or any adjournment thereof, however called, or in any
other circumstances upon which its vote, consent, or other approval is sought,
Stockholder shall vote or cause to be voted the Shares: (i) in favor of the
Merger, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement; (ii) against any Third Party Acquisition (as defined in the Merger
Agreement), other than the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated
thereby; and (iii) against any other action which is intended, or could
reasonably be expected, to impede, interfere with, delay, postpone or adversely
affect the Merger or any of the other transaction contemplated by the Merger
Agreement, or any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
3. Grant of Irrevocable Proxy.
(a) Stockholder hereby constitutes and appoints Buyer, which shall act by
and through Daniel Sahakian and Henry Sahakian (each, a "Proxy Holder"), or
either of them, with full power of substitutions, its true and lawful proxy and
attorney-in-fact to vote at any meeting (and any adjournment or postponement
thereof) of Company's stockholders called for purposes of considering whether to
approve the Merger Agreement, the Merger or any of the other transactions
contemplated by the Merger
B-1
Agreement, or any Third Party Acquisition, or to execute a written consent of
stockholders in lieu of any such meeting, all of the Shares held of record or
beneficially by Stockholder or which Stockholder otherwise controls as of the
date of such meeting or written consent (i) in favor of the approval of the
Merger Agreement, the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
Merger Agreement, (ii) against any Third Party Acquisition and (iii) against any
other action which is intended, or could reasonably be expected, to impede,
interfere with, delay, postpone or adversely affect the Merger or any of the
other transaction contemplated by the merger Agreement, or any of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Such proxy shall be limited
strictly to the power to vote the Shares in the manner set forth in the
preceding sentence and shall not extend to any other matters.
4. Tender Pursuant to Section 7.6 of the Merger Agreement. In the event
that Buyer commences an Offer pursuant to Section 7.6 of the Merger Agreement,
Stockholder hereby agrees with Buyer that Stockholder will (i) promptly after
the date of commencement of the Offer (but in all events not later than five (5)
business days thereafter), tender to Buyer all Shares held of record or
beneficially by Stockholder on such date (the "Tendered Shares") and (ii) tender
to Buyer promptly after Stockholder's acquisition thereof (but in all events not
later than five (5) business days thereafter) all other Shares of Company's
Common Stock acquired and held of record or beneficially by Stockholder or which
Stockholder otherwise controls at any time prior to the date on which Buyer
accepts shares tendered to Buyer pursuant to the Offer or the date on which the
Offer is terminated or expires without Buyer's having accepted shares for
payment; all such subsequently tendered Shares shall constitute "Tendered
Shares" for all purposes of this Agreement. Stockholder agrees not to withdraw
any of the Tendered Shares unless the Offer is terminated or has expired without
Buyer's having accepted the Tendered Shares for payment. Stockholder
acknowledges and agrees that Buyer's obligation to accept for payment and pay
for the Tendered Shares is subject to all the terms and conditions of the Offer.
5. Certain Events. If, on or after the date of this Agreement, there
shall occur any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, combination or
exchange of shares, merger, consolidation, reorganization or other change or
transaction of or by Company as a result of which shares of any class of stock
or other securities shall be issued in respect of any Shares, or if any Shares
shall be changed into the same or a different number of shares of the same or
another class of stock or other securities, or upon any other acquisition of any
securities of Company in any other manner, and whether in compliance with the
provisions of this Agreement or otherwise, any such shares or other securities
shall, from and after their receipt or acquisition by Stockholder, constitute
additional Shares of Stockholder.
6. No Solicitation. Except as permitted by the Merger Agreement,
Stockholder agrees that between the date of this Agreement and the Termination
Date, Stockholder will not directly or indirectly: (i) solicit, initiate, or
take an action intended to encourage or induce the making, submission or
announcement of any Third Party Acquisition; or (ii) engage or participate in
any discussions or negotiations with any person (other than any officer,
director, controlled affiliate or employee of Company or any of its subsidiaries
or any investment banker, attorney or other advisor or representative of Company
or any of its subsidiaries) regarding, or furnish to any person any information
with respect to, or take any other action intended to facilitate any inquiries
or the making of any proposal that constitutes or may reasonably be expected to
lead to, any Third Party Acquisition. Stockholder will immediately cease and
cause to be terminated any discussions or negotiations between Stockholder and
any other parties that may be ongoing with respect to any Third Party
Acquisition. Stockholder will promptly advise Buyer orally and in writing of any
Third Party Acquisition proposal received by Stockholder or any request for
information with respect to any Third Party Acquisition received by Stockholder,
the material terms and conditions of such Third Party Acquisition or request and
the identity of the person making such Third Party Acquisition proposal or
request. This Agreement does not affect or restrict Stockholder's actions taken
or not taken in his or her capacity as a director or officer of Company.
7. Further Assurances. Stockholder shall perform such further acts and
execute any further documents and instruments as may reasonably be required to
vest in Buyer the power to carry out the provisions of this Agreement.
B-2
8. Representations and Warranties of Stockholder. Stockholder hereby
represents and warrants to Buyer as follows:
(a) Stockholder has all requisite power and authority to enter into
this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. This
Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by Stockholder and this
Agreement constitutes the valid and binding obligation of Stockholder,
enforceable in accordance with its terms. The execution and delivery of
this Agreement do not, and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby and compliance with the terms hereof will not, conflict
with or result in any violation of, or default (with or without notice or
lapse of time, or both) under any provision of any trust agreement, loan or
credit agreement, note, bond, mortgage, indenture, lease or other
agreement, instrument, permit, concession, franchise, license, judgment,
order, decree, statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation applicable to
Stockholder or to Stockholder's property or assets. No consent, approval,
order or authorization of, or registration, declaration or filing with, any
person or public authority is required by or with respect to Stockholder in
connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement or the
consummation by Stockholder of the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) Stockholder is the record or beneficial owner of, or otherwise has
the right to control, the number of Shares set forth on the signature page
of this Agreement. Stockholder does not beneficially own, or have any
existing right to acquire, any securities of Company other than as
indicated on the signature page of this Agreement. Stockholder has voting
power with respect to the matters set forth in Section 2 hereof with
respect to all of the Shares set forth on the signature page hereof, with
no limitations, qualifications or restrictions on such rights except as may
be set forth in any trust agreement where Stockholder is acting as trustee.
9. Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or
obligations hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties without the prior
written consent of the other parties, except that Buyer may assign, in its sole
discretion, any or all of its rights, interests and obligations hereunder to any
direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Buyer. Subject to the preceding
sentence, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and
be enforceable by the respective, heirs, legal representatives, successors and
permitted assigns of the parties hereto.
10. General Provisions.
(a) Specific Performance. The parties hereto acknowledge that damages
would be an inadequate remedy for any breach of the provisions of this Agreement
and agree that the obligations of the parties hereunder shall be specifically
enforceable.
(b) Expenses. All costs and expenses incurred in connection with this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party
incurring such costs and expenses.
(c) Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented
only by a written instrument duly executed by the parties hereto.
(d) Notices. All notices that are required or permitted hereunder shall be
in writing and shall be sufficient if personally delivered or sent by mail,
facsimile message or Federal Express or other delivery service. Any notices
shall be deemed given upon the earlier of the date when received at, or the
third day after the date when sent by registered or certified mail or the day
after the date when sent by Federal
B-3
Express to, the address or fax number set forth below, unless such address or
fax number is changed by notice to the other party hereto:
If to Buyer:
Green Valley Acquisition Co., LLC
c/o Ara Kervandjian and
Paul Levinsohn
477 East Beaver Avenue
State College, PA 16801-5696
Telecopier: (814) 234-3277
If to Stockholder, to the Stockholder's address indicated on the signature
page to this Agreement.
(e) Descriptive Headings: Definitions. The headings contained in this
Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. All capitalized terms used herein
but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Merger
Agreement.
(f) Counterparts and Effectiveness. This Agreement may be executed in two
counterparts, each of which shall be binding as of the date first written above,
and all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.
(g) Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the documents and
instruments referred to herein) and the Proxy constitute the entire agreement
and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral,
between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.
(h) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its
provisions concerning conflict of laws.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Buyer and Stockholder have caused this Agreement to be
signed, as of the date first written above.
GREEN VALLEY ACQUISITION CO., LLC STOCKHOLDER
By: By:
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Signature
Name: Name:
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Title: Title:
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Address:
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
Telephone:
------------------------------------------
Shares owned of record or
beneficially or which
Stockholder otherwise
controls:
------------------------------------
B-4
ANNEX C -- OPINION OF BOENNING & SCATTERGOOD, INC.
BOENNING & SCATTERGOOD, INC.
ESTABLISHED 1914
INVESTMENT BANKING
January 26, 2004
Ad-Hoc Committee of The Board of Directors
Uni-Marts, Inc.
477 East Beaver Avenue
State College, Pennsylvania 16801-5690
Dear Sirs:
We understand that Uni-Marts, Inc. (the "Company") and Green Valley
Acquisition Co., LLC ("Purchaser"), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated January 26, 2004 (the "Merger Agreement") pursuant to which, upon the
terms and subject to the conditions contained in the Merger Agreement, Uni-Marts
shall be merged with and into the Purchaser (the "Transaction") and all of the
issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Uni-Marts, par value $.10 per
share (the "Shares"), other than shares held by shareholders of the Purchaser,
shall be converted into the right to received $2.25 per share in cash (the
"Consideration").
You have asked us whether, in our opinion, the Consideration to be received
by holders of the Shares pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fair from a
financial point of view to such holders.
Boenning & Scattergood, Inc., as part of its investment banking business,
regularly is engaged in the valuation of assets, securities and companies in
connection with various types of asset and securities transactions, including
mergers, acquisitions, going-private transactions, private placements and
valuations for various other purposes, and in the determination of the adequacy
of consideration in such transactions. We have been retained by the Ad Hoc
Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") for the purpose of
providing this opinion. We have not been authorized by Uni-Marts, the Committee
or the Board of Directors to solicit, nor have we solicited, third-party
indications of interest for acquisition of all or any part of Uni-Marts. In the
ordinary course of its business as a broker-dealer, Boenning may, from time to
time, purchase securities from, and sell securities to, Uni-Marts. In the
ordinary course of business, Boenning & Scattergood may actively trade the
securities of Uni-Marts for its own account and for the accounts of customers
and accordingly may at any time hold long or short position in such securities.
In arriving at our opinion, we have, among other things: (i) reviewed the
historical financial performance, current financial position and general
prospects of Uni-Marts, and reviewed certain internal financial analyses and
forecasts prepared by the management of Uni-Marts, (ii) reviewed a draft of the
Merger Agreement, (iii) studied and analyzed the stock market trading history of
Uni-Marts, (iv) considered the terms and conditions of the Transaction as
compared with the terms and conditions of certain acquisition transactions
involving operators of convenience stores and blocks of stores, (v) met and/or
communicated with certain members of Uni-Marts' senior management to discuss its
operations, historical financial statements and future prospects, and (vi)
conducted such other financial analyses, studies and investigations as we deemed
appropriate.
Our opinion is given in reliance on information and representations made or
given by Uni-Marts, and its officers, directors, auditors, counsel and other
agents, and on filings, releases and other information issued or provided to us
by Uni-Marts including financial statements, financial projections and stock
price data as well as certain information from recognized independent sources.
We have not independently verified the information concerning Uni-Marts or other
data which we have considered in our review and, for purposes of the opinion set
forth below, we have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of
all such information and data. We have not conducted a physical inspection of
any properties or facilities of Uni-Marts. We have not made or obtained any
independent evaluation or
C-1
appraisal of any of the properties or facilities of Uni-Marts. Additionally, we
assume that the Transaction is in all respects lawful under applicable law.
With regard to financial and other information relating to the general
prospects of Uni-Marts, we have assumed that such information has been
reasonably prepared and reflects the best currently available estimates and
judgments of the management of Uni-Marts as to Uni-Marts' most likely future
performance. We have also assumed, with your consent, that the Merger Agreement
and related documents that we reviewed will conform in all material respects to
their final form.
Our opinion is based upon information provided to us by the management of
Uni-Marts, as well as market, economic, industry, financial and other conditions
as they exist and can be evaluated only as of the date hereof and speaks to no
other period. Our opinion pertains only to the financial consideration of the
Transaction and is provided for the information and assistance of the Committee.
Our opinion does not constitute a recommendation to the Committee and does not
constitute a recommendation to Uni-Marts' shareholders as to whether how such
shareholders should vote on the Transaction.
On the basis of, and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Consideration to be received by the holders of Shares
pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to such
holders.
Sincerely,
BOENNING & SCATTERGOOD, INC.
C-2
ANNEX D -- SECTION 262 OF DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
SEC. 262. APPRAISAL RIGHTS.
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of
stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this
section with respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through
the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise complied
with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither voted in favor of the
merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to sec. 228 of
this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the
fair value of the stockholder's shares of stock under the circumstances
described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this section,
the word "stockholder" means a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation
and also a member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words "stock" and
"share" mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and also
membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and the
words "depository receipt" mean a receipt or other instrument issued by a
depository representing an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof,
solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or
series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be
effected pursuant to sec. 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to
sec. 251(g) of this title), sec. 252, sec. 254, sec. 257, sec. 258, sec. 263 or
sec. 264 of this title:
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of stock, which stock, or
depository receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed to determine
the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting of
stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or consolidation, were either
(i) listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market
system security on an interdealer quotation system by the National Association
of Securities Dealers, Inc. or (ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders;
and further provided that no appraisal rights shall be available for any shares
of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did not
require for its approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving
corporation as provided in subsection (f) of sec. 251 of this title.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, appraisal rights
under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of
stock of a constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required by the
terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to sec.sec. 251, 252,
254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this title to accept for such stock anything
except:
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such
merger or consolidation, or depository receipts in respect thereof;
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository receipts in
respect thereof, which shares of stock (or depository receipts in respect
thereof) or depository receipts at the effective date of the merger or
consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or
designated as a national market system security on an interdealer quotation
system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or held of record
by more than 2,000 holders;
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts
described in the foregoing subparagraphs a. and b. of this paragraph; or
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository receipts and cash in
lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the
foregoing subparagraphs a., b. and c. of this paragraph.
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware corporation
party to a merger effected under sec. 253 of this title is not owned by the
parent corporation immediately prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be
available for the shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that
appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any
class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to
D-1
its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the
corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all
of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains
such a provision, the procedures of this section, including those set forth in
subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is
practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which appraisal rights are
provided under this section is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of
stockholders, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, shall
notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record date for such meeting
with respect to shares for which appraisal rights are available pursuant to
subsection (b) or (c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any or all
of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall include in such notice
a copy of this section. Each stockholder electing to demand the appraisal of
such stockholder's shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of
the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for appraisal of such
stockholder's shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs
the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder
intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholder's shares. A proxy or
vote against the merger or consolidation shall not constitute such a demand. A
stockholder electing to take such action must do so by a separate written demand
as herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of such merger or
consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation shall notify each
stockholder of each constituent corporation who has complied with this
subsection and has not voted in favor of or consented to the merger or
consolidation of the date that the merger or consolidation has become effective;
or
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to sec. 228 or
sec. 253 of this title, then either a constituent corporation before the
effective date of the merger or consolidation or the surviving or resulting
corporation within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders of any
class or series of stock of such constituent corporation who are entitled to
appraisal rights of the approval of the merger or consolidation and that
appraisal rights are available for any or all shares of such class or series of
stock of such constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy
of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the effective date
of the merger or consolidation, shall, also notify such stockholders of the
effective date of the merger or consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to
appraisal rights may, within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice,
demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation the appraisal of
such holder's shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs
the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder
intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such holder's shares. If such notice
did not notify stockholders of the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, either (i) each such constituent corporation shall send a second
notice before the effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each
of the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation
that are entitled to appraisal rights of the effective date of the merger or
consolidation or (ii) the surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a
second notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such effective
date; provided, however, that if such second notice is sent more than 20 days
following the sending of the first notice, such second notice need only be sent
to each stockholder who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded
appraisal of such holder's shares in accordance with this subsection. An
affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary or of the transfer agent of
the corporation that is required to give either notice that such notice has been
given shall, in the absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts
stated therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled to receive
either notice, each constituent corporation may fix, in advance, a record date
that shall be not more than 10 days prior to the date the notice is given,
provided, that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation, the record date shall be such effective date. If no
record date is fixed and the notice is given prior to the effective date, the
record date shall be the close of business on the day next preceding the day on
which the notice is given.
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has
complied with subsections (a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to
appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery demanding a
determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any
D-2
time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any
stockholder shall have the right to withdraw such stockholder's demand for
appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation.
Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any
stockholder who has complied with the requirements of subsections (a) and (d)
hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation
surviving the merger or resulting from the consolidation a statement setting
forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or
consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received
and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written statement shall
be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after such stockholder's written
request for such a statement is received by the surviving or resulting
corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of
demands for appraisal under subsection (d) hereof, whichever is later.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a
copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which
shall within 20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in
Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their
shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been
reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be
filed by the surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so
ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the
hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or
resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses
therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1 or more publications at
least 1 week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as
the Court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication
shall be approved by the Court, and the costs thereof shall be borne by the
surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the
stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to
appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an
appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation
thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder
fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to
such stockholder.
(h) After determining the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court
shall appraise the shares, determining their fair value exclusive of any element
of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or
consolidation, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon
the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the
Court shall take into account all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate
of interest, the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate of
interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would have had to pay to
borrow money during the pendency of the proceeding. Upon application by the
surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate
in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, permit discovery
or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior
to the final determination of the stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any
stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting
corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted
such stockholder's certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is
required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally
determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights under this
section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares,
together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the
stockholders entitled thereto. Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court
may direct. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of
holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares
represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the
certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as
other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving
or resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.
D-3
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed
upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon
application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the
expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal
proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and the
fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all
the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no
stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d) of
this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive
payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or
other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior
to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided, however, that
if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in
subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver to the
surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of such stockholder's
demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either
within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as
provided in subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written
approval of the corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal
shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court
of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the
Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems
just.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the
shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they
assented to the merger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized and
unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.
D-4
PROXY
UNI-MARTS INC.
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
June ___, 2004
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF UNI-MARTS INC.
The undersigned, revoking any contrary proxy previously given, hereby appoints
N. Gregory Petrick and __________________, and each of them jointly and
severally, as attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of
substitution, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, to appear
at the Special Meeting of Stockholders of Uni-Marts Inc. to be held June __,
2002, and at any postponement or adjournment of the Special Meeting of
Stockholders, and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this proxy card,
all shares of Common Stock of Uni-Marts Inc. held of record by the undersigned
on _____, 2004, with all the powers and authority the undersigned would possess
if personally present. The undersigned confers discretionary authority by this
proxy as to matters which may properly come before the meeting or any
postponement or adjournment of the Special Meeting of Stockholders and which are
not known to the Board of Directors of Uni-Marts Inc. a reasonable time before
this solicitation of proxies.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF UNI-MARTS INC. RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF
THE MERGER AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNI-MARTS INC. AND GREEN VALLEY ACQUISITION CO.,
LLC AND THE MERGER OF UNI-MARTS INC. WITH AND INTO GREEN VALLEY ACQUISITION CO.,
LLC.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted as specified on the reverse side
of this proxy card. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN WITH RESPECT TO HOW YOU WANT THE
PROXIES TO VOTE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" THE
APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE PROPOSED MERGER.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the proxy statement dated
_______, 2004 relating to the foregoing proposal.
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY
CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
PLEASE MARK VOTES AS IN THIS EXAMPLE [Box with "X"]
UNI-MARTS INC.
This Proxy will be voted as directed. IF NO DIRECTION TO THE CONTRARY IS
INDICATED, THE PROXIES INTEND TO VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE MERGER PROPOSAL.
By signing and returning this proxy the undersigned gives the proxies
discretionary authority regarding any other business which may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting of
stockholders and which is not known to the Board of Directors of Uni-Marts Inc.
a reasonable time before this solicitation of proxies.
MATTER TO BE ACTED UPON: PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT BETWEEN
UNI-MARTS INC. AND GREEN VALLEY ACQUISITION CO., LLC AND THE MERGER OF UNI-MARTS
INC. WITH AND INTO GREEN VALLEY ACQUISITION CO., LLC.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
PLEASE BE SURE TO SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY.
Date:
-------------------------------------------------------- ---------------
Stockholder sign here Co-owner sign here
NOTE: Please sign exactly as the name appears hereon. When shares are held by
joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a
corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized
officer and affix corporate seal. If a partnership, please sign in partnership
name by general partner.