UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 0-220-20

CASTELLE
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

855 Jarvis Drive, Suite 100, Morgan Hill, California 95037
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(408) 852-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, No Par Value

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in any amendment to this Form 10-K or in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the
Form 10-K. [_]

The approximate aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based upon the last sale price of the Common Stock reported on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on March 15, 2002 was $3,428,000. Shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock have been excluded. Exclusion of shares held by any person should not be construed to indicate that such person possesses the power, direct or indirect, to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of the Registrant, or that such person is controlled by or under common control with the Registrant.

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as March 15, 2002 was 4,744,795.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information required by Part III of this Form 10-K will be incorporated by reference from certain portions of Castelle’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the SEC no later than April 30, 2002 or will be provided in an amendment to this Form 10-K to be filed with the SEC no later than April 30, 2002.

SPECIAL NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that are based on our current expectations about our company and our industry. All of our forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results could differ significantly from our expectations and from the results expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We urge you to consider these cautionary statements carefully in evaluating our forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events and circumstances. Important factors that may cause results to differ from expectations include those discussed in Risk Factors beginning on page 25 in this document.

PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

     The following summary should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the more detailed information and Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

OVERVIEW

      Castelle was incorporated in California in 1987, and its principal offices are located at 855 Jarvis Drive, Suite 100, Morgan Hill, California 95037. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Form 10-K to “we,” “us,” or the “Company” refer to Castelle. The Company’s telephone number is (408) 852-8000. Castelle^®, LANpress^® and JetPress^® are registered trademarks and InfoPress™ is a trademark of the Company. This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes trademarks and trade names of other companies.

      Castelle designs, develops, markets and supports server appliances providing office messaging solutions and other shared services. The Company’s current products are focused on two areas: fax and integrated messaging products, including a range of software enhancements, and print servers. The Company’s products consist of FaxPress, an integrated hardware/software network faxing solution; OfficeDirect, an integrated fax/email messaging system; InfoPress, an enterprise-level fax-on-demand software product; and LANpress print servers.

      The Company’s products have historically centered on fax and print servers and related technologies. Starting in 1997, the Company’s revenues have declined as competition increased, primarily with the print server products in the Asia Pacific Region, while at the same time the Internet and other networking technologies advanced. As a result, the Company experienced annual operating losses during fiscal 1997 through 1999. During the past two years, management has redirected the Company’s efforts to focus on server appliances and on development efforts to integrate existing and future products with the Internet and emerging networking technologies. Through the introduction of the enhanced fax messaging products that generate higher gross profits, restructuring and implementing numerous cost reductions, the Company was able to report operating profits in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999 and in each of the four quarters of fiscal 2000. Although the Company was profitable in fiscal 2000, it incurred $591,000 of losses in fiscal 2001 resulting from a decrease in demand for our products due in part to the slowness of the economy.

Industry Background

      In the mid-1980s, organizations began to interconnect personal computers into local area networks (“LANs”) in order to allow work groups to share files and peripherals such as printers. As LANs have proliferated throughout organizations and client/server architectures have gained acceptance, they have become increasingly complex, the size and multimedia intensity of files being transmitted has increased and the applications operating on the computer networks have become more critical to the success of the business enterprise. The proliferation of the Internet and Intranets and popularity of electronic communications expanded the role of LAN’s as a means to provide common access to the Internet, email and other messaging applications. Installation, maintenance and administration of LAN equipment have always required a staff of highly skilled professionals. The costs associated with LANs and related equipment are significant and typically affordable only by larger organizations. Many small and medium sized businesses were not able to invest in necessary equipment and support staff. This created the need for specialized networking equipment that would allow network administrators to deploy complex networking applications without the cost and time required to install server-based software solutions. These devices are known in the industry as “Server Appliances” or “Thin Servers”. A server appliance is an integrated software/hardware solution designed to reduce the complexity and cost for a specific server based application. Internet routers, email servers, remote access servers, communication servers, and print servers are examples of the server appliances used by businesses today.

      Castelle pioneered server appliances, establishing a benchmark for “plug and play” and ease of use with its fax and print server product families.

      Fax Messaging Products: The increasing popularity of email and the Internet provided a boost to all types of electronic communications as many users and organizations become more comfortable and accustomed to their use. To further simplify and improve inter- and intra-organizational communications, corporate MIS departments are looking for ways to integrate different types of messaging into a unified messaging environment. Fax remains one of the key business communication tools and is one of the essential components of the corporate messaging environment. In corporate communication infrastructures, fax is being integrated into email. To facilitate this capability companies install email-integrated fax server systems.

      Fax servers allow users to send and receive faxes as easily as emails, using the same email application for both types of messages. A fax server can sort incoming faxes directly and deliver them electronically and confidentially to the electronic mailboxes of the intended recipients. Fax server can also be used as an independent network shared messaging system in environments that require high volume incoming and outgoing faxes. Users are able to send and receive faxes directly from their computers or workstations, eliminating the need to print a document, take it to a stand-alone fax machine and wait for its transmission. Fax servers can help reduce fax transmission costs by sending non-urgent faxes at “off-peak” telephone rates and by utilizing fax over the Internet technology.

      These fax servers can be implemented using complex software that require Windows NT or UNIX systems and specialized expensive fax modems. Our lower cost solution is a dedicated fax server appliance, such as the Castelle FaxPress.

      Automated delivery of information is another popular application of the fax technology. Fax-on-demand is the ability to use a touch-tone phone and a fax machine to request and receive copies of documents on demand. Although there are a wide variety of applications installed, the two most common applications are customer support and literature fulfillment applications. The largest industry using fax-on-demand is the high-technology sector, with applications also installed in travel, government, newspapers, manufacturing and non-profit organizations. Essentially, any company with information to disseminate publicly is a potential information-on-demand customer. Castelle’s InfoPress product line provides a comprehensive solution for automated information delivery via fax and email.

2

      Integrated Messaging Servers. Proliferation of various types of electronic communications created a need for unified messaging systems. Instead of using single-function software programs for different types of messages, such as emails and faxes, many users prefer to use a single application such as Microsoft Outlook for all messages. Integrating different systems to handle various message types can be complex and expensive. To simplify this process, next-generation messaging servers, such as Castelle’s OfficeDirect Messaging Server, provide both email and fax capabilities in one integrated system.

      Print Servers: The sharing of printers, a basic benefit of a LAN, has traditionally been provided by connecting a printer either to a network file server or to a dedicated personal computer on the network. However, direct connection to the file server has several disadvantages, including the risk of the file server being overburdened by the processing required to print large or graphically complex files, lower print transfer speeds and location inflexibility. Similarly, printer connection to a dedicated personal computer, while providing better location flexibility, is more costly and offers substantially lower print file transfer speed than a dedicated print server can provide. A print server directly connects one or more printers to a LAN, providing a cost-effective, high-speed solution to the demand for shared print resources on a LAN. In addition to providing location flexibility and convenience, print servers improve network performance by relieving the burden on the file server. Furthermore, print servers enable users to access essential information about the status of the printer and their print files and to select their desired printer configuration.

      Server appliances, such as communications/messaging servers and print servers, have emerged to gain significant market acceptance due to their ability to significantly reduce complexity and cost associated with the installation and maintenance of networking systems. These appliances also make the complex functionality of Internet and Intranet communications available and affordable to many smaller businesses. As MIS professionals in larger organizations and business owners of smaller enterprises continue to recognize the benefits of server appliances to provide such critical functionality as Internet and Intranet communications, remote access, scanning, electronic mail and related functions, the Company believes that the demand for such network systems will increase.

Castelle Strategy

      Castelle’s objective is to be a leading worldwide supplier of server appliances providing office messaging solutions and other shared services. Castelle pioneered server appliances, establishing a benchmark for “plug and play” and ease of use with its fax and print server product families. Castelle products are installed in many Fortune 1000 companies, and in small and medium sized businesses worldwide. Castelle is now applying its proven technology to the office, integrating desktop messaging, Internet connectivity, print and other shared services.

      Focus on Server Appliances: The Company focuses exclusively on providing innovative, reliable, easy-to-use network products. Since its inception, the Company has focused on developing networking products that utilize advanced software to tightly integrate proprietary hardware systems with standard computing platforms. As a result, the Company believes it has developed a high level of expertise in networking, software development, hardware design and telephony technology. The Company plans to capitalize on these attributes by continuing to focus on providing network enhancement products that enable users to communicate more effectively.

3

      Focus on Messaging and Communications: The Company focuses on developing application solutions for inter and intra-company communications. The Company believes that its focus on application servers rather than on infrastructure systems enables the Company to offer products that bring higher value services to customers and provide a higher margin to the Company.

      Expand Product Line: The Company is leveraging its expertise in server appliances to offer new easy-to-use, cost-effective solutions. The Company continues to expand both its fax and print server products and apply its proven technology to other areas.

      Focus on E-commerce and Other High Volume Distribution Channels: The Company has established a two-tier domestic and international distribution network of leading national and regional network product distributors and resellers including Ingram Micro and TechData. Castelle’s products are well suited for sale by e-commerce vendors and the Company has been successful working with leading suppliers such as CDW and Insight.. The Company also sells through OEM vendors such as Fujitsu Ltd. in Japan (“Fujitsu”). The Company is focused on maintaining and strengthening its current distribution network in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific regions.

      Leverage Strategic Relationships: The Company augments its product offerings by establishing relationships with companies able to provide products in areas outside of the Company’s core technical competencies or in instances where internal development of such products is not cost-effective. The Company also establishes relationships with numerous leaders in hardware and software technology to enable it to keep abreast of, and respond quickly to, technological changes that may affect the network enhancement market.

Products

      The Company develops and markets a range of server appliance products that enhance network productivity, performance and functionality. The Company’s current products are grouped into two areas: fax messaging products, including a range of software enhancements, and print servers.

      Fax Messaging Products: The Company offers the FaxPress family of email-integrated fax server appliances. The Company positions the FaxPress as the easiest way to add faxing to your network and integrate fax with email. FaxPress allows network users to send, receive, route, print, store, edit and retrieve fax transmissions from their own personal computers on a local area network. FaxPress can be integrated into an email system creating a unified fax/email messaging environment. FaxPress enables users to transmit documents directly to a fax device as easily as if they were printing to a laser printer or sending an email message. The product also provides network administration features like control, monitoring, logging or configuration. The Company’s fax server products are designed to comply with current regulatory standards in the United States, Europe and the Pacific Rim. During fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, fax products represented 91%, 86% and 78%, respectively, of total net sales.

      Key features of the FaxPress products (configured with its current software versions) include:

4

      The Company offers a family of FaxPress fax server systems ranging from entry-level products targeted to small businesses with fewer than 50 users to high-end fax solutions capable of supporting enterprise-wide installations. The suggested U.S. list prices for FaxPress fax server products range from $1,495 to $9,995. The server pricing is based on hardware model, with no per-user costs. The FaxPress 2500, 5000 and 7000 families come with the FaxPress 6.x PRO version that adds integration with popular email packages, and many advanced fax management and integration features. FaxPress 6.x PRO is optional on FaxPress SBE. The following table summarizes the Company’s FaxPress system products:

5

      Information-on-demand systems: InfoPress software enables the access of information via any touch-tone phone and a fax machine and allows the dissemination of information via “broadcasting” to a select database of fax numbers. InfoPress allows companies to use one source of documents in a Castelle document library and to automatically publish the documents using either the fax-on-demand and/or email-on-demand methods.

      Castelle’s InfoPress is a software product designed to operate on the Microsoft Windows NT/2000/XP platforms. The system utilizes voice and fax processing hardware, as well as telephone system interface (analog or T1) hardware with as few as two and as many as 288 ports that are actually deployed at a customer site.

      Integrated Messaging Products: The OfficeDirect family of products is designed to provide integrated email and fax communications to small offices. The OfficeDirect family consists of the OfficeDirect Messaging Server.100 and OfficeDirect Storage Server.100. The OfficeDirect Messaging Server is an integrated e-mail/fax messaging server appliance tailored to meet the needs of small offices or workgroups that need to provide robust communication services to network users. It combines an SMTP and POP3 e-mail server with a full-featured fax server in a plug-n-forget, easy-to-use, economical system, which includes all necessary hardware and software. The OfficeDirect Messaging Server integrates e-mail and fax services into the Microsoft Outlook client software. The OfficeDirect Storage Server is a complimentary product to the messaging server and provides convenient and reliable storage for the network system files and messages. It also provides generic network storage and printer sharing to network users.

      Print Servers: Printer sharing continues to be one of the important benefits of computer networking. Print servers are the most efficient and economical way of sharing printers on networks. While demand for print servers in various sizes of businesses continues to grow, the market is very competitive. Castelle has been involved in the print server business for more than ten years. After continuous improvements on the cost and feature set, Castelle’s LANpress has become a well-received print server product line. Our latest print server models incorporate a RISC microprocessor, Fast Ethernet, Windows 2000, Internet Printing and many other attractive new features. Castelle LANpress JR is the world’s smallest print server commercially available today. It’s similar in size to that of a standard printer cable connector. The suggested U.S. list price for LANpress print servers ranges from $149 to $395. During fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, print server products represented 9%, 14% and 22%, respectively, of total net sales.

6

      The following table summarizes the Company’s line of LANpress external print servers:

Research and Product Development

      The Company has invested substantially in research and product development since inception. The Company believes its future performance will depend in large part on its ability to enhance its current products, to expand its product offerings, to maintain technological competitiveness and meet an expanding range of customer requirements.

      Castelle continues to invest in enhancing its server appliance product lines by developing new versions of client and server software and server hardware. The product feature set is driven by the increasing complexity of user needs. The changing corporate communications/messaging environment and increasing demand for easy-to-use networking systems define these needs. The development efforts are focused on enhancing functionality of existing products and developing other systems to expand our product offerings. The Company’s development efforts are focusing on high value applications, while relying on its partners to provide basic functionality for some of its product lines.

      In fiscal 2000, the Company developed new versions of its FaxPress servers offering simpler integration with Private Branch Exchanges (“PBX”) and email systems. The FaxPress 7500 offers eight lines of fax and a 4-channel integrated Direct Inward Dialing (“DID”) or Ear and Mouth (“E&M”) converter that significantly simplifies implementation of a fax system that provides automated delivery of incoming faxes into individual mailboxes.

7

      The current FaxPress fax server product line is continuously enhanced to offer greater integration into corporate networking environments with such features as:

      There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in developing and marketing the new software and hardware product versions or in identifying and responding to other emerging technological developments or that any development will achieve commercial acceptance. The Company is seeking and will continue to seek to hire additional skilled development engineers. Such engineers are likely to be in short supply, and the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected if it encounters delays in hiring or fails to retain the required skilled engineers. See “Business – Risk Factors – Key Personnel.”

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

      Castelle sells its products through multiple channels, determined by the product, market and customer need. The Company has an established two-tier domestic and international distribution network of leading national and regional network product distributors and resellers. The Company also sells through OEM vendors such as Fujitsu in Japan. Software enhancements and options that complement the FaxPress products are primarily marketed directly by the Company to registered end users. The direct sales group works closely with distributors and VARs in qualifying sales opportunities for the fax and print server products. The Company also sells some products through the on-line store on its Web site. Demand for Castelle’s products is created through a variety of marketing programs. These programs are targeted toward end-users to stimulate demand for the products and toward distributors, resellers, VARs and e-commerce vendors to promote the product in the sales channel. These programs include targeted and active participation in industry networking and communication trade shows, as well as advertising in associated publications. The Company increases awareness of Company products by Internet marketing via targeted e-advertising, publishing and sponsoring email newsletters, enhancing its Web presence, print advertising, conducting direct mail campaigns, offering seminars, trade shows and conferences and other forms of public relations efforts. The Company’s Web site has been updated and designed to assist customers in obtaining information about Castelle products and contacting Castelle sales personnel, and offers selected products and services through the Company’s on-line store.

      The Company’s products are well suited for sale by e-commerce vendors, and the Company has experienced success working with leading suppliers such as CDW and Insight.

      The Company’s five largest distributors accounted for approximately 56% of the Company’s net sales in fiscal 2001, 43% of its net sales in fiscal 2000 and 42% of its net sales in fiscal 1999. Ingram and Tech Data, the Company’s largest domestic distributors and Macnica, the Company’s principal Japanese distributor, accounted for approximately 27%, 17% and 10%, respectively, of the Company’s net sales in fiscal 2001, 17%, 10% and 15%, respectively, of its net sales in fiscal 2000 and 12%, 7% and 18%, respectively, of its net sales in fiscal 1999. Sales to customers located in the Pacific Rim and Europe comprised approximately 20%, 25% and 31% of the Company’s net sales in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. In fiscal 2000, the Company terminated its agreement with Merisel, a domestic distributor, due to the change in the distributor’s business strategy, which was not in line with the Company’s business strategy. The Company’s distributors typically represent other products that are complementary to or compete with those of the Company. While the Company attempts to encourage its distributors to focus on Castelle’s products through a variety of marketing and support programs, our distributors may give higher priority to products of other suppliers, thereby reducing the efforts they devote to selling our products. In particular, certain of our competitors, including Hewlett-Packard and Intel, sell a substantially higher total dollar volume of products through several of the Company’s large U.S. distributors and, as a result, the Company believes such distributors give higher priority to products offered by such competitors. The Company’s distributors are not contractually committed to future purchases of the Company’s products and could discontinue carrying the Company’s products at any time for any reason. The Company has a stock rotation policy with certain of its distributors that allows them to return marketable inventory against offsetting orders. In the event that the Company reduces its prices, the Company credits certain of its distributors for the difference between the purchase price of products remaining in their inventory and the Company’s reduced price for such products. See “Risk Factors – Dependence on Suppliers and Subcontractors.”

8

Customer Service and Support

      The Company provides customers with support services, which are available to assist customers with installation, use and operation issues that will ensure smooth and reliable operation of Castelle products. The Company’s network engineers, located at corporate headquarters, provide technical support via telephone, fax and email during normal Company business days from 6:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Pacific Time). As part of the Company’s global partner program, VARs have access to “priority technical support” via a special toll-free number that provides immediate access to Castelle network engineers. Support is provided under warranty terms as well as through extended warranty agreements sold directly to the customer by the Company. The Company also provides other customer support through its web site. The Company has an automated call management distribution system that provides improved levels of support to help resolve customer issues.

Manufacturing

      The Company’s current in-house manufacturing operations consist primarily of material planning, assembly, final testing, quality control and service repair. Certain of the Company’s manufacturing operations are performed by third party manufacturers that provide customized, integrated manufacturing services, including procurement, manufacturing and associated printed circuit board assembly. The Company also relies on SerComm to manufacture certain of its print server products. These arrangements enable the Company to shift certain costs to such providers, thereby allowing the Company to focus resources on its product development efforts. The failure of such manufacturers, particularly SerComm, to meet their contractual commitments to the Company could cause delays in product shipments, thereby potentially adversely affecting the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

      The Company does not currently have any material long-term supply contracts with any of its manufacturing subcontractors or component suppliers other than an agreement with SerComm relating to the manufacture of print servers. The Company purchases components on a purchase order basis. The Company owns all engineering, sourcing documentation, functional test equipment and tooling used in manufacturing its products, except for the products which are produced by SerComm, and believes that it could shift product assembly to alternate suppliers if necessary. Certain key components of the Company’s products, including a modem chip set from Conexant, and microprocessors from Motorola, are currently available from single sources. Other components of the Company’s products are currently available from only a limited number of sources. In addition, the Company subcontracts a substantial portion of its manufacturing to third parties, and there can be no assurance that these subcontractors will be able to support the manufacturing requirements of the Company. The Company’s ability to obtain these components or sub-assemblies is dependent upon its ability to accurately forecast customer demand for its products and to anticipate shortages of critical components or sub-assemblies created by competing demands upon suppliers. If the Company were unable to obtain a sufficient supply of high-quality components or sub-assemblies from its current sources, the Company could experience delays in obtaining such components or sub-assemblies from other sources. Resulting delays or reductions in product shipments could adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition and damage customer relationships. Furthermore, a significant increase in the price of one or more of these components or sub-assemblies or the Company’s inability to lower component or sub-assembly prices in response to competitive price reductions could adversely affect the Company’s business operating results and financial condition. See “Risk Factors – Dependence on Suppliers and Subcontractors.”

9

Competition

      The network enhancement products and computer software markets are highly competitive, and the Company believes that such competition will intensify in the future. The competition is characterized by rapid change and improvements in technology along with constant pressure to reduce the prices of products. The Company currently competes principally in the market for network fax servers and network print servers and fax-on-demand software. Increased competition, direct and indirect, could adversely affect the Company’s business and operating results through pricing pressure, loss of market share and other factors. In particular, the Company expects that, over time, average selling prices for its print server products will continue to decline, as the market for these products becomes increasingly competitive. Any material reduction in the average selling prices of the Company’s products would adversely affect gross margins. There can be no assurance the Company will be able to maintain the current average selling prices of its products or the related gross margins.

      The principal competitive factors affecting the market for the Company’s products include product functionality, performance, quality, reliability, ease of use, quality of customer training and support, name recognition, price, and compatibility and conformance with industry standards and changing operating system environments. Several of the Company’s existing and potential competitors, most notably the Hewlett-Packard Company (“Hewlett-Packard”) and Intel Corporation (“Intel”), have substantially greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than the Company. The Company also experiences competition from a number of other software, hardware and service companies. In addition to its current competitors, the Company may face substantial competition from new entrants into the network enhancement market, including established and emerging computer, computer peripherals, communications and software companies. In the fax server market the Company competes with companies such as Captaris Inc., Omtool, Ltd. and Computer Associates International, Inc. There can be no assurance that competitors will not introduce products incorporating technology more advanced than the technology used by the Company in its products. In addition, certain competing methods of communications such as the Internet or electronic mail could adversely affect the market for fax products. Certain of the Company’s existing and potential competitors in the print server market are manufacturers of printers and other peripherals, and these competitors may develop closed systems accessible only through their own proprietary servers. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. See “Risk Factors – Competition and Price Erosion” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations.”

Proprietary Rights

      The Company’s success depends to a certain extent upon its technological expertise and proprietary software technology. The Company relies upon a combination of contractual rights and copyright, trademark and trade secret laws to establish and protect its technologies. Additionally, the Company generally enters into confidentiality agreements with those employees, distributors, customers and suppliers who have access to sensitive information and limits access to and distribution of its software documentation and other proprietary information. Because of the rapid pace of technological change in the LAN product industry, the Company believes that patent protection for its products is less significant to its success than the knowledge, ability and experience of its employees, the frequent introduction and market acceptance of new products and product enhancements, and the timeliness and quality of support services provided by the Company. See “Risk Factors – Dependence on Proprietary Rights; Uncertainty of Obtaining Licenses.”

10

      Despite the precautions taken by the Company, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy certain portions of the Company’s products or to reverse engineer or obtain and use information that the Company regards as proprietary. There can be no assurance that the Company’s precautions will be adequate to deter misappropriation or infringement of its proprietary technologies. Furthermore, while the Company has obtained federal registration for many of its trademarks in the United States, certain of its trademarks have not been registered in the United States and the Company has registered some of its trademarks in foreign jurisdictions. There can be no assurance that the Company’s use of such unregistered trademarks will not be contested by third parties in the future. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries either do not protect the Company’s proprietary rights or offer only limited protection. Given the rapid evolution of technology and uncertainties in intellectual property law in the United States and internationally there can be no assurance that the Company’s current or future products will not be subject to third-party claims of infringement. Any litigation to determine the validity of any third-party claims could result in significant expense to the Company and divert the efforts of the Company’s technical and management personnel, whether or not such litigation is determined in favor of the Company. In the event of an adverse result in any such litigation, the Company could be required to expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or to obtain licenses to the technology that is the subject of the litigation. There can be no assurance that the Company would be successful in such development or that any such licenses would be available. The Company also relies on technology licenses from third parties. There can be no assurance that these licenses will continue to be available to the Company upon reasonable terms, if at all. Any impairment or termination of the Company’s relationship with third-party licensors could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Government Regulation

      Certain aspects of the networking industry in which the Company competes are regulated both in the United States and in foreign countries. Imposition of public carrier tariffs, taxation of telecommunications services and the necessity of incurring substantial costs and expenditure of managerial resources to obtain regulatory approvals, particularly in foreign countries where telecommunications standards differ from those in the United States, or the inability to obtain regulatory approvals within a reasonable period of time, could have a material, adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. The Company’s products must comply with a variety of equipment, interface and installation standards promulgated by communications regulatory authorities in different countries. Changes in government policies, regulations and interface standards could require the redesign of products and result in product shipment delays which could have a material, adverse impact on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. See “Risk Factors – Government Regulations.”

Employees

      As of February 28, 2002, the Company employed a total of 44 full-time equivalent personnel, 8 in manufacturing, 12 in sales and marketing, 8 in engineering, 9 in customer service and 7 in finance and administration. The Company has not experienced a work stoppage, no employees are represented by a labor organization and the Company considers its employee relations to be good.

11

Executive Officers

      The names of the executive officers of the Company and their ages as of February 28, 2002 are set forth below:

Donald L. Rich

Paul Cheng

Eric Chen

12

Edward J. Heinze

Michael Petrovich

Boris Elpiner, formerly Vice President of Marketing, ceased to be an employee with the Company on February  28,  2002.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

      The Company’s headquarters, including its executive offices and corporate administration, development, manufacturing, marketing, sales and technical services/support facilities, are located in Morgan Hill, California in approximately 16,600 square-feet of leased office space. The Company occupies this facility under a lease, the term of which expires in December 2005 with one conditional three-year option, which if exercised, would extend the lease to December 2008. The Company moved into this new facility in December 2000 from the previous location in Santa Clara, California, after the Santa Clara lease expired. In fiscal 2001, the Company consolidated its offices in El Dorado Hills, California and in the United Kingdom with the Company’s headquarters in Morgan Hill, after both of these leases expired. In addition, the Company rents office space for sales and customer support office in Illinois. The Company believes its existing facilities will be adequate to meet its requirements for the foreseeable future.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

      The Company has been contacted by a third party claiming that the Company needs to obtain licenses of certain patents held by that party for certain of the Company’s fax server products. The Company is continuing to assess the validity and strength of the claims, believes it has adequate legal defenses and that the ultimate outcome of any possible action will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows although there can be no assurance as to the outcome of any possible litigation.

13

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS

      The Company held its 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on November 7, 2001 (the “2001 Annual Meeting”). At the 2001 Annual Meeting, the Company’s shareholders elected five directors nominated by the Board of Directors by the votes indicated:

      The proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001 was approved with 3,429,531 votes in favor of the of the proposal, 300 votes against and 5,400 votes abstained.

14

PART II

      The Company’s Common Stock (Nasdaq symbol “CSTL”) began trading on the Nasdaq National Market on December 20, 1995 and was transferred to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market as of April 1999. The following table shows the closing high and low sale prices per share of Castelle’s Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. Such quotations do not include retail markups, markdowns or commissions.

      As of March 15, 2002, there were 110 holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock. On March 15, 2002 the last sale price reported on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market for the Company’s Common Stock was $0.65 per share.

Dividend Policy

      The Company has not paid cash dividends on its Common Stock. The Board of Directors currently intends to retain any and all earnings for use in the Company’s business and the Company does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

      The following selected financial information has been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

15

      Net loss for fiscal 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998 and 1997 included net charges for restructuring and other non-recurring items of $239,000, $0, $400,000, $1.1 million and $6.1 million respectively. For detailed information on these transactions see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Restructuring and Other Charges and Amortization of Intangible Assets” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Quarterly Results of Operations

      The following table sets forth certain unaudited consolidated quarterly financial data for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2001. This information is unaudited, but in the opinion of management, has been prepared substantially on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report, and all necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, hade been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes to such statements appearing elsewhere in this report. The results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for any future period.

Selected Quarterly Data (unaudited)

16

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

      This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that are subject to many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ significantly from expectations. For more information on forward-looking statements, refer to the “Special Note on Forward Looking Statements” at the front of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      Our products have historically centered on fax and print servers and related technologies. Starting in 1997, our revenues have declined as competition increased, primarily with the print server products in the Asia Pacific Region, while at the same time the Internet and other networking technologies advanced. As a result, we experienced annual operating losses beginning from fiscal 1997 through fiscal 1999. During the past three years, we have redirected our efforts to focus on server appliances and on development efforts to integrate existing and future products with the Internet and emerging networking technologies. We introduced our new products, the FaxPress 5000 in February 1999, FaxPress 2500 in November 1999, FaxPress SBE in February 2000, the FaxPress 7500 in September 2000 and the OfficeDirect family of products in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000. Through mainly the release of these enhanced products in the fax messaging family and continuous efforts in product cost enhancements, our gross profit improved and the total cost of sales as a percentage of net sales have decreased from 46.7% in fiscal 1997 to 32.1% in fiscal 2001.

      In fiscal 1997, we announced and began to implement a restructuring plan, which was mostly completed in fiscal 1999. As a result, operating expenses, not including non-recurring restructuring charges, were reduced from $14.6 million in fiscal 1997 to $14.1 million, $11.6 million and $8.7 million, respectively, in fiscal 1998, 1999 and 2000. The economic downturn in early 2001 required us to streamline operating expenses again to be more in line with the softened revenue. This restructuring helped us to restore profitability in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2001.

      Additionally, improved cash management helped us to provide positive cash flows in the last several years. Despite the impact from softened revenue and a one-time use of $600,000 on leasehold improvements to the new Morgan Hill, California headquarters in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000 and the first quarter of fiscal 2001, cash balances at the end of December 31, 2001 remained at $4.6 million, as compared to $4.7 million at the end of fiscal 1999, but increased by $675,000 when compared to December 31, 2000.

17

Critical Accounting Policies

      We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. We have defined a critical accounting policy as one that is both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and requires our management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note [2] in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, beginning on page [F-6]. Note that our preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be perceived with certainty. We based our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments. These estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as our operating environment changes.

Revenue recognition

      We recognize revenue based on the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 48 “Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists”.

      Product revenue is recognized upon shipment if a signed contract exists, the fee is fixed and determinable, collection of the resulting receivables is probable and product returns are reasonably estimable. Shipment generally occurs when product is delivered to a common carrier.

      We enter into agreements with certain of our distributors which permit limited stock rotation rights. These stock rotation rights allow the distributor to return products for credit but require the purchase of additional products of equal value. Customers who purchase our products directly from us also have limited return rights, which expire thirty days from product shipment. Revenues subject to stock rotation rights are reduced by our estimates of anticipated exchanges. We establish our returns allowance policy for distributors based on historic return rates from these distributors. If the historical data used by the Company to calculate these estimates does not properly reflect future returns, revenue could be overstated.

      Pursuant to our agreements with distributors, we also protect our distributors’ exposure related to the impact of price reductions. Price adjustments are recorded at the time products are shipped. We estimate the impact of price reductions based on historical data. Should prices erode faster than our current estimate, revision to the estimated liability would be required.

      We recognize revenue from the sale of extended warranty contracts ratably over the period of the contracts.

      We recognize royalty on the sale of LANpress products by a Japanese distributor. Royalty is not recognized as revenue until the products are sold by the distributor.

      Provisions for estimated warranty costs are recorded at the time products are shipped. While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should product failure rates, material usage or service delivery cost differ from our estimates, revision to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

18

Credit, collection and allowance for doubtful accounts

      Ongoing customer credit evaluations are performed by us and collateral is not required. We assess collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the credit-worthiness of the customer. When credit criteria are not met, we require cash-on-delivery or payment by credit card before the products are shipped. On a quarterly basis, we specifically analyze accounts receivable, potential returns, historical bad debts, customer concentration, and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts and for potential returns. Such returns and losses have generally been within our expectations. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Three customers accounted for 72% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2001 and three customers accounted for 59% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2000. In fiscal 2001, three distributors accounted for approximately 27%, 17% and 10% of our net sales. In fiscal 2000, the same three distributors accounted for approximately 17%, 10% and 15% of net sales, respectively.

Inventories and related allowance for obsolete and excess inventory

      Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates cost on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. Inventories have also been reduced by an allowance for excess and obsolete inventories. The estimated allowance is based on management’s review of inventories on hand on a quarterly basis, compared to management’s assumptions about future demand, market conditions and anticipated timing of the release of product upgrades or next generation products. If actual market conditions for future demand are less favorable than those projected by us or if product upgrades or next general products are released earlier than anticipated, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

Results of Operations

   Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000

19

20

21

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2000 and 1999

22

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

      Since our initial public offering of common stock in December 1995, our principal source of funding has been cash from our operations, with some funding from capital equipment lease lines. As of December 31, 2001, we had $4.6 million of cash and cash equivalents, an increase of $675,000 from December 31, 2000. The increase in cash and cash equivalents in fiscal 2001 was primarily attributable to operating cash inflows of $643,000 from improved collection of outstanding balances owed to us by our customers, reduced inventory to meet the current revenue projections, offset in part by more timely payments to our vendors. The increase in cash and cash equivalents in fiscal 2001 compares to cash used in operating activities of $188,000 in fiscal 2000. Working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, decreased to $3.6 million at December  31, 2001 from $4 million at December  31,  2000.

      We have a $3.0 million secured revolving line of credit with a bank, which expires in March 2003, pursuant to which we may borrow 100% against pledges of cash at the bank’s prime rate (4.75% at December 31, 2001). Borrowings under this line of credit agreement are collateralized by all of our assets. We are in compliance with the terms of the agreement, and at December 31, 2001 had no borrowings under the line of credit.

      In December 1997, as a source of capital asset financing, we entered into a loan and security agreement with a finance company for an amount up to $288,000. The amounts borrowed are subject to interest of 10.11%, were repayable by December 2000, and were partially collateralized by a certificate of deposit of $125,000, which is included as restricted cash on the accompanying balance sheet. The loan was completely paid off as of December 31, 2000. The restricted cash was returned to us in February 2001.

      In December 2000, as a source of capital asset financing, we entered into a loan and security agreement with a finance company for an amount of $75,000. This loan is subject to interest of 12.82% and is repayable by December 2006. As of December 31, 2001, the future minimum payments are $86,000.

23

      In April 2001, as a source of capital asset financing, we entered into a loan and security agreement with a finance company for an amount of $25,000. This loan is subject to interest of 12.5% and is repayable by April 2003. As of December 31, 2001, the future minimum payments are $22,000.

      The Company has entered into noncancelable operating leases that expire at various stages ending in 2006, and is responsible for certain maintenance costs, taxes and insurance under the leases. In August 2000, the Company entered into a lease for a new facility in Morgan Hill, California and relocated its corporate headquarters in December 2000 after the lease at the Santa Clara, California location expired at the same time. The lease on the new facility has a term of 5 years, expiring in December 2005 with one conditional three-year option, which if exercised would extend the lease to December 2008 commencing with rent at ninety-five percent of fair market value.

      The following represents combined aggregate maturities for all the Company’s financing and commitments as of December 31, 2001:

      In addition to the commitments shown above, the Company has a $3.0 million collateralized revolving line of credit with a bank, which expires in March 2003, pursuant to which the Company may borrow 100% against pledges of cash at the bank’s prime rate (4.75% at December 31, 2001). Borrowings under this line of credit agreement are collateralized by all of the assets of the Company. The Company was in compliance with the terms of the agreement, and at December 31, 2001 had no borrowings under the line of credit.

      Net cash provided by operations in fiscal 2001 was $643,000 as compared to $188,000 of net cash used in operations in fiscal 2000. The increase was largely a result of improved collection of outstanding balances owed to us by our customers, reduced inventory to meet the current revenue projections, offset in part by more timely payments to our vendors.

      Net cash used in investing activities reduced to $105,000 in fiscal 2001, as compared to $559,000 in fiscal 2000. We acquired additional property and equipment of $80,000, $593,000 and $184,000, in fiscal 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. The increase in property and equipment in fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2000 were largely a reflection of the investment of leasehold improvements in our new corporate headquarters, and excluded capital equipment of $25,000 and $75,000, respectively, in fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2000 purchased through equipment leases. Other reductions in computer and office equipment in fiscal 2001 represented mostly excess equipment taken out of service from our offices in El Dorado Hills, California and the United Kingdom, as they were deemed unnecessary due to the reductions in workforce.

      The development and marketing of products requires significant amounts of capital. The Company believes that its existing cash balances, anticipated cash flows from operations and available lines of credit will be sufficient to meet its anticipated capital requirements for the next 12 months. However, a decline in future orders and revenues might require us to seek additional capital to meet our working capital needs during or beyond the next twelve months if we are unable to reduce expenses to the degree necessary to avoid incurring losses. If we have a need for additional capital resources, we may be required to sell additional equity or debt securities, secure additional lines of credit or obtain other third party financing. The timing and amount of such capital requirements cannot be determined at this time and will depend on a number of factors, including demand for the Company’s existing and new products and changes in technology in the networking industry. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available on satisfactory terms when needed, if at all. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities would result in additional dilution to our shareholders.

24

RISK FACTORS

     Shareholders or investors considering the purchase of shares of the Company’s Common Stock should carefully consider the following risk factors, in addition to other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems immaterial also may impair the Company’s business operations.

Fluctuations in Operating Results

      The Company’s revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past and the Company’s future revenues and operating results are likely to fluctuate significantly in the future, particularly on a quarterly basis.

      The Company’s operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a variety of factors, some of which are outside the control of the Company, including changes in the Company’s product and customer mix, constraints in the Company’s manufacturing and assembling operations, shortages or increases in the prices of raw materials and components, changes in pricing policy by the Company or its competitors, a slowdown in the growth of the networking market, seasonality, timing of expenditures and economic conditions in the United States, Europe and Asia. The Company’s sales will often reflect orders shipped in the same quarter in which they are received. The Company’s backlog at any given time is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any succeeding period. In addition, significant portions of the Company’s expenses are relatively fixed in nature, and planned expenditures are based primarily on sales forecasts. Therefore, if the Company inaccurately forecasts demand for its products, the impact on net income may be magnified by the Company’s inability to adjust spending quickly enough to compensate for the net sales shortfall.

      Other factors contributing to fluctuations in the Company’s quarterly operating results include changes in the demand for the Company’s products, customer order deferrals in anticipation of new versions of the Company’s products, the introduction of new products and product enhancements by the Company or its competitors, the effects of filling the distribution channels following such introductions, potential delays in the availability of announced or anticipated products, the mix of product and service revenue, the commencement or conclusion of significant development contracts, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the timing of acquisitions and associated costs, and the timing of significant marketing and sales promotions. Based on the foregoing, the Company believes that quarterly operating results are likely to vary significantly in the future and that period-to-period comparisons of its results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be viewed upon as indications of future performance.

History of Losses; Accumulated Deficit

      The Company has experienced significant operating losses and, as of December 31, 2001, had an accumulated deficit of $24.8 million. The development and marketing by the Company of its current and new products will continue to require substantial expenditures. The Company incurred $591,000 of losses in fiscal 2001 due to a slowdown in demand for its products due in part to an industry-wide adverse economic condition. There can be no assurance that growth in net sales or profitability will be achieved or sustained in future years. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

25

Nasdaq SmallCap Listing; Risk associated with Limited Market

      The Company’s Common Stock has been listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market since April 1999. In order to maintain it’s listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, the Company must maintain total assets, capital and public float at specified levels, and generally must maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share. If the Company fails to maintain the standard necessary to be quoted on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, the Company’s Common Stock could become subject to delisting. On March 12, 2002, the Company received a notice from the Nasdaq Stock Market that its common stock had failed to maintain the minimum bid price of $1.00 per share required for continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. If the Company’s common stock fails to meet the $1.00 bid price per share for a minimum of ten consecutive trading days prior to September 9, 2002, the Company’s Common Stock will be delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. If the Common Stock is delisted, trading in the Common Stock could be conducted on the OTC Bulletin Board or in the over-the-counter market in what is commonly referred to as the “pink sheets.” If this occurs, a shareholder will find it more difficult to dispose of the Common Stock or to obtain accurate quotations as to the price of the Common Stock. Lack of any active trading market would have an adverse effect on a shareholder’s ability to liquidate an investment in the Company’s Common Stock easily and quickly at a reasonable price. It might also contribute to volatility in the market price of the Company’s Common Stock and could adversely affect the Company’s ability to raise additional equity or debt financing on acceptable terms or at all. Failure to obtain desired financing on acceptable terms could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Rapid Technological Change; Risks Associated with New Products

      The market for the Company’s products is affected by rapidly changing networking technology and evolving industry standards and the emergence of the Internet and other new communication technologies. The Company believes that its future success will depend upon its ability to enhance its existing products and to identify, develop, manufacture and introduce new products which conform to or support emerging network telecommunications standards, are compatible with a growing array of computer and peripheral devices, support popular computer and network operating systems and applications, meet a wide range of evolving user needs and achieve market acceptance. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in these efforts. The Company has incurred, and the Company expects to continue to incur, substantial expenses associated with the introduction and promotion of new products. There can be no assurance that the expenses incurred will not exceed research and development cost estimates or that new products will achieve market acceptance and generate sales sufficient to offset development costs. In order to develop new products successfully, the Company is dependent upon timely access to information about new technological developments and standards. There can be no assurance that the Company will have such access or that it will be able to develop new products successfully and respond effectively to technological change or new product announcements by others. Furthermore, the Company expects that printer and other peripheral manufacturers will add features to their products that make them more network accessible, which may reduce demand for the Company’s print servers. There can be no assurance that products or technologies developed by others will not render the Company’s products non-competitive or obsolete. The fax-on-demand market in general has been negatively affected by the growth of the Internet. Although the Company has new Web/fax/email products in development, there can be no assurance these products will compete successfully. Complex products such as those offered by the Company may contain undetected or unresolved hardware defects or software errors when they are first introduced or as new versions are released. Changes in the Company’s or its suppliers’ manufacturing processes or the inadvertent use of defective components by the Company or its suppliers could adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve acceptable manufacturing yields and product reliability. The Company has in the past discovered hardware defects and software errors in certain of its new products and enhancements after their introduction. There can be no assurance that despite testing by the Company and by third-party test sites, errors will not be found in future releases of the Company’s products, which would result in adverse product reviews and negatively affect market acceptance of these products.

26

      The introduction of new or enhanced products requires the Company to manage the transition, both internally and for customers, from the older products to the new or enhanced products or versions. The Company must manage new product introductions so as to minimize disruption in customer ordering patterns, avoid excessive levels of older product inventories and ensure that adequate supplies of new products can be delivered to meet customer demands. The Company has from time to time experienced delays in the shipment of new products. There can be no assurance that future product transitions will be managed successfully by the Company.

Key Personnel

      The Company’s success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of the Company’s key management, marketing, product development and operational personnel. The success of the Company will depend to a large extent upon its ability to retain and continue to attract highly skilled personnel. Competition for employees in the computer industry is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to attract and retain enough qualified employees. The Company’s inability to retain and attract key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s product development, business, operating results and financial condition. The Company does not carry key person life insurance with respect to any of its personnel.

Competition and Price Erosion

      The network enhancement products and computer software markets are highly competitive, and the Company believes that such competition will intensify in the future. The competition is characterized by rapid change and improvements in technology along with constant pressure to reduce the prices of products. The Company currently competes principally in the market for network fax servers and network print servers and fax-on-demand software. Increased competition, direct and indirect, could adversely affect the Company’s business and operating results through pricing pressure, loss of market share and other factors. In particular, the Company expects that, over time, average selling prices for its print server products will continue to decline, as the market for these products becomes increasingly competitive. Any material reduction in the average selling prices of the Company’s products would adversely affect gross margins. There can be no assurance the Company will be able to maintain the current average selling prices of its products or the related gross margins.

      The principal competitive factors affecting the market for the Company’s products include product functionality, performance, quality, reliability, ease of use, quality of customer training and support, name recognition, price, and compatibility and conformance with industry standards and changing operating system environments. Several of the Company’s existing and potential competitors, most notably the Hewlett-Packard Company (“Hewlett-Packard”) and Intel Corporation (“Intel”), have substantially greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than the Company. The Company also experiences competition from a number of other software, hardware and service companies. In addition to its current competitors, the Company may face substantial competition from new entrants into the network enhancement market, including established and emerging computer, computer peripherals, communications and software companies. In the fax server market the Company competes with companies such as Captaris Inc., Omtool, Ltd. and Computer Associates International, Inc.

27

There can be no assurance that competitors will not introduce products incorporating technology more advanced than the technology used by the Company in its products. In addition, certain competing methods of communications such as the Internet or electronic mail could adversely affect the market for fax products. Certain of the Company’s existing and potential competitors in the print server market are manufacturers of printers and other peripherals, and these competitors may develop closed systems accessible only through their own proprietary servers. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

International Sales

      Sales to customers located outside Canada and the United States accounted for approximately 20%, 25% and 31% of the Company’s net sales in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The Company sells its products in approximately 40 foreign countries through approximately 50 international distributors. Macnica, the Company’s principal Japanese distributor, accounted for approximately 46%, 60% and 60% of the Company’s international sales in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, and 10%, 15% and 18% of the Company’s total net sales in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The Company expects that international sales will continue to represent a significant portion of the Company’s product revenues and that the Company will be subject to the normal risks of international sales, such as export laws, currency fluctuations, longer payment cycles, greater difficulties in accounts receivable collections and the requirement of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws. There can be no assurance that the Company will not experience difficulties resulting from changes in foreign laws relating to the export of its products in the future. In addition, because the Company primarily invoices its foreign sales in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in exchange rates could affect demand for the Company’s products by causing its prices to be out of line with products priced in the local currency. Additionally, any such difficulties would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s international sales and a resulting material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. In fiscal 2001, the Company consolidated its operations in the United Kingdom and entered into an agreement with a distributor to service the region. In addition, the Company entered into a separate agreement in fiscal 2001 with a Japanese distributor to sell the Company’s LANpress products in Japan, from which the Company is entitled to receive a royalty on sales of these products. The Company may experience fluctuations in European sales on a quarterly basis because European sales may be weaker during the third quarter than the second quarter due to extended holiday shutdowns in July and August. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to maintain the level of international sales in the future. Any fluctuations in international sales will greatly affect the Company’s operating results and financial condition.

Lack of Product Revenue Diversification

      The Company derives substantially all of its sales from its fax and print server products, with its fax server products accounting for 91% of its total sales in fiscal 2001. The Company is leveraging its expertise in these areas to develop new messaging features and products to support greater integration into corporate network environments and with Internet communications. The Company expects that its current products will continue to account for a majority of the Company’s sales in the near future. A decline in demand for these products as a result of competition, technological change or other factors, or a delay in the development and market acceptance of new features and products, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Product Transition; Risk of Product Returns and Inventory Obsolescence

      From time to time, the Company may announce new products, product versions, capabilities or technologies that have the potential to replace or shorten the life cycles of existing products. The release of a new product or product version may result in the write-down of products in inventory if such inventory becomes obsolete. The Company has in the past experienced increased returns of a particular product version following the announcement of a planned release of a new version of that product. There can be no assurance that product returns will not exceed the Company’s allowance for such returns in the future and will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

28

Concentration of Distributors; Distribution Risks

      The Company sells its products primarily through a two-tier domestic and international distribution network. The Company’s distributors sell Castelle’s products to VARs, e-commerce vendors and other resellers. The distribution of personal computers and networking products has been characterized by rapid change, including consolidations due to the financial difficulties of distributors and the emergence of alternative distribution channels. In addition, an increasing number of companies are competing for access to these channels. The Company’s distributors typically represent other products that are complementary to, or compete with, those of the Company. In particular, certain of its competitors, including Hewlett-Packard and Intel, sell a substantially higher dollar volume of products through several of the Company’s large U.S. distributors, and as a result, the Company believes such distributors give higher priority to products offered by such competitors. The Company’s distributors are not contractually committed to future purchases of the Company’s products and could discontinue carrying the Company’s products at any time for any reason. In addition, because the Company is dependent on a small number of distributors for a significant portion of the sales of its products, the loss of any of the Company’s major distributors or their inability to satisfy their payment obligations to the Company could have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. The Company has a stock rotation policy with certain of its distributors that allows them to return marketable inventory against offsetting orders. Should the Company reduce its prices, the Company credits certain of its distributors for the difference between the purchase price of products remaining in their inventory and the Company’s reduced price for such products. In addition, due to industry conditions or the actions of competitors, inventory levels of the Company’s products held by distributors could become excessive, resulting in product returns and inventory write-downs. Although the Company provides an allowance for anticipated returns and for price protection, and believes its existing policy results in the establishment of an allowance that is adequate, there can be no assurance that in the future returns and price protection will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Dependence on Third-Party Suppliers and Subcontractors

      The Company’s products incorporate or require components or sub-assemblies procured from third-party suppliers. Certain of these components or sub-assemblies are available only from a single source, and others are available only from limited sources. Certain key components of the Company’s products, including a modem chip set from Conexant Systems, Inc. (“Conexant”) and a microprocessor from Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”), are currently available from single sources. Other product components are currently available from only a limited number of sources. In addition, the Company subcontracts a substantial portion of its manufacturing to third parties, and there can be no assurance that these subcontractors will be able to support the manufacturing requirements of the Company. Other than an agreement with Sercomm Corporation to manufacture certain print server products, the Company does not have material long-term supply contracts with third parties or any other sole or limited source vendors and subcontractors. The Company purchases components or sub-assemblies on a purchase order basis. The Company’s ability to obtain these components and sub-assemblies is dependent upon its ability to accurately forecast customer demand for its products and to anticipate shortages of critical components or sub-assemblies created by competing demands upon suppliers. If the Company were unable to obtain a sufficient supply of high-quality components or sub-assemblies from its current sources, the Company could experience delays in obtaining such components or sub-assemblies from other sources. Resulting delays or reductions in product shipments could adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition and damage customer relationships. Furthermore, a significant increase in the price of one or more of these components or sub-assemblies or the Company’s inability to lower component or sub-assembly prices in response to competitive price reductions could adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

29

      The Company augments its product offerings by obtaining access to third-party products and technologies in areas outside of its core competencies or where the Company believes internal development of products and technologies is not cost-effective. The Company’s third-party supplier of certain print server products is SerComm. There can be no assurance that these products will produce gross margins comparable to those of the Company’s internally generated products or that the parties with which the Company contracts will continue to provide the quantities and quality of products needed by the Company or that they will upgrade their respective products on a timely basis. The termination of the Company’s relationships with third-party product suppliers and with SerComm, in particular, could result in delays or reductions in product shipments, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Government Regulation

      Certain aspects of the networking industry in which the Company competes are regulated both in the United States and in foreign countries. Imposition of public carrier tariffs, taxation of telecommunications services and the necessity of incurring substantial costs and expenditure of managerial resources to obtain regulatory approvals, particularly in foreign countries where telecommunications standards differ from those in the United States, or the inability to obtain regulatory approvals within a reasonable period of time, could have a material, adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. The Company’s products must comply with a variety of equipment, interface and installation standards promulgated by communications regulatory authorities in different countries. Changes in government policies, regulations and interface standards could require the redesign of products and result in product shipment delays which could have a material, adverse impact on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Dependence on Proprietary Rights; Uncertainty of Obtaining Licenses

      The Company’s success depends to a certain extent upon its technological expertise and proprietary software technology. The Company relies upon a combination of contractual rights and copyright, trademark and trade secret laws to establish and protect its technologies. Despite the precautions taken by the Company, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy the Company’s products or to reverse engineer or obtain and use information that the Company regards as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries either do not protect the Company’s proprietary rights or offer only limited protection. Given the rapid evolution of technology and uncertainties in intellectual property law in the United States and internationally, there can be no assurance that the Company’s current or future products will not be subject to third-party claims of infringement. Any litigation to determine the validity of any third-party claims could result in significant expense to the Company and divert the efforts of the Company’s technical and management personnel, whether or not such litigation is determined in favor of the Company. In the event of an adverse result in any such litigation, the Company could be required to expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or to obtain licenses to the technology that is the subject of the litigation. There can be no assurance that the Company would be successful in such development or that any such licenses would be available. The Company also relies on technology licenses from third parties. There can be no assurance that these licenses will continue to be available to the Company upon reasonable terms, if at all. Any impairment or termination of the Company’s relationship with third-party licensors could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. There can be no assurance that the Company’s precautions will be adequate to deter misappropriation or infringement of its proprietary technologies. Furthermore, while the Company has obtained federal registration for many of its trademarks in the United States, certain of its trademarks have not been registered in the United States or foreign jurisdictions. There can be no assurance that the Company’s use of such registered trademarks will not be contested by third parties in the future.

30

      The Company has received, and may receive in the future, communications asserting that its products infringe the proprietary rights of third parties or seeking indemnification against such infringement. There can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against the Company with respect to current or future products or that any such assertion may not require the Company to enter into royalty arrangements or result in costly litigation. As the number of software products in the industry increases and the functionality of these products further overlap, the Company believes that software developers may become increasingly subject to infringement claims. Any such claims, with or without merit, can be time consuming and expensive to defend. There can be no assurance that any such intellectual property litigation that may be brought in the future will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. As a result of such claims or litigation, it may become necessary or desirable in the future for the Company to obtain licenses relating to one or more of its products or relating to current or future technologies, and there can be no assurance that it would be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms.

Possible Volatility of the Company’s Common Stock Price

      The price of the Company’s Common Stock has fluctuated widely in the past. Sales of substantial amounts of the Company’s Common Stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Company’s Common Stock. The management of the Company believes that such past fluctuations may have been caused by the factors identified above as well as announcements of new products, quarterly fluctuations in the results of operations and other factors, including changes in the condition of the personal computer industry in general. These fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions, such as recessions or international currency fluctuations, may adversely affect the market price of the Company’s Common Stock. Stock markets have experienced extreme price volatility in recent years. This volatility has had a substantial effect on the market prices of securities issued by the Company and other high technology companies, often for reasons unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. The Company anticipates that prices for Castelle Common Stock may continue to be volatile. Such future stock price volatility for Castelle Common Stock may provoke the initiation of securities litigation, which may divert substantial management resources and have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Future Capital Requirements

      The development and marketing of products requires significant amounts of capital. The Company believes that its existing cash balances, anticipated cash flows from operations and available lines of credit will be sufficient to meet its anticipated capital requirements for the next 12 months. However, a decline in future orders and revenues might require us to seek additional capital to meet our working capital needs during or beyond the next twelve months if we are unable to reduce expenses to the degree necessary to avoid incurring losses. If we have a need for additional capital resources, we may be required to sell additional equity or debt securities, secure additional lines of credit or obtain other third party financing. The timing and amount of such capital requirements cannot be determined at this time and will depend on a number of factors, including demand for the Company’s existing and new products and changes in technology in the networking industry. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available on satisfactory terms when needed, if at all. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities would result in additional dilution to our shareholders. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

31

Recent Terrorist Activity in the United States and the Military Action to Counter Terrorism Could Adversely Impact Our Business

      The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States, the ensuing declaration of war on terrorism and the continued threat of terrorist activity and other acts of war or hostility appear to be having an adverse effect on business, financial and general economic conditions in the U.S. These effects may, in turn, result in increased costs due to the need to provide enhanced security, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. These circumstances may also adversely affect our ability to attract and retain customers and our ability to raise additional capital.

Voting Control by Officers, Directors and Affiliates

      At March 15, 2002, the Company’s officers and directors and their affiliates beneficially owned approximately 29% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. Accordingly, together they had the ability to significantly influence the election of the Company’s directors and other corporate actions requiring shareholder approval. Such concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company.

Certain Charter Provisions

      The Company’s Board of Directors has authority to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of these shares without any further vote or action by the shareholders. The rights of the holders of the Company’s Common Stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any Preferred Stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of Preferred Stock, while providing desirable flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of the outstanding voting stock of the Company, thereby delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company. Furthermore, such Preferred Stock may have other rights, including economic rights, senior to the Common Stock, and as a result, the issuance thereof could have a material adverse effect on the market value of the Company’s Common Stock.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

      In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS 141 requires the purchase method of accounting for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and eliminates the pooling-of-interests method. We believe that the adoption of SFAS 141 will not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

      In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which is effective for fiscal years beginning after March 15, 2001. SFAS 142 requires, among other things, the discontinuance of goodwill amortization. In addition, the standard includes provisions upon adoption for the reclassification of certain existing recognized intangibles as goodwill, reassessment of the useful lives of existing recognized intangibles, reclassification of certain intangibles out of previously reported goodwill and the testing for impairment of existing goodwill and other intangibles. We believe that the adoption of SFAS 142 will not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

32

      In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” SFAS 144 supercedes SFAS 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of.” SFAS 144 applies to all long-lived assets (including discontinued operations) and consequently amends Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30. SFAS 144 develops one accounting model for long-lived assets that are to be disposed of by sale. SFAS 144 requires that long-lived assets that are to be disposed of by sale be measured at the lower of book value or fair value less cost to sell. Additionally, SFAS 144 expands the scope of discontinued operations to include all components of an entity with operations that (1) can be distinguished from the rest of the entity and (2) will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity in a disposal transaction. SFAS 144 is effective for the Company for all financial statements issued in fiscal 2002. We are currently assessing, but have not yet determined, the impact of SFAS 144 on the Company.

      In November 2001, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached consensus on EITF No. 01-9, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or Reseller of the Vendor’s Products.” EITF No. 01-9 addresses the accounting for consideration given by a vendor to a customer and is a codification of EITF No. 00-14, “Accounting for Certain Sales Incentives”, EITF No. 00-22, “Accounting for ‘Points’ and Certain Other Time-Based or Volume-Based Sales Incentives Offers and Offers for Free Products or Services to be Delivered in the Future”, and EITF No. 00-25, “Vendor Income Statement Characterization of Consideration Paid to a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products.” EITF 01-09 presumes that consideration from a vendor to a customer or reseller of the vendor’s products to be a reduction of the selling prices of the vendor’s products and, therefore, should be characterized as a reduction of revenue when recognized in the vendor’s income statement and could lead to negative revenue under certain circumstances. Revenue reduction is required unless consideration relates to a separate identifiable benefit and the benefit’s fair value can be established. This issue should be applied no later than in annual or interim financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2001, which is our first quarter ended March 31, 2002. Upon adoption we are required to reclassify all prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation. We are currently assessing, but have not yet determined, the impact of EITF No. 01-9 on our statement of operations.

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

      We considered the provision of Financial Reporting Release No. 48 “Disclosure of Accounting Policies for Derivative Financial Instruments and Derivative Commodity Instruments, and Disclosure of Quantitative and Qualitative Information about Market Risk Inherent in Derivative Financial Instruments, Other Financial Instruments and Derivative Commodity Instruments.” We had no holdings of derivative financial or commodity instruments at December 31, 2001. However, we are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. While much of our revenue is transacted in U.S dollars, some revenues and capital spending are transacted in Pounds Sterling. These amounts are not currently material to our financial statements; therefore we believe that foreign currency exchange rates should not materially affect our overall financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The fair value of our money market account or related income would not be significantly impacted by increases or decreases in interest rates due mainly to the highly liquid nature of this investment. However, sharp declines in interest rates could seriously harm interest earnings on this account.

33

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

      None

34

PART III

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Identification of Directors

      The information required by this Item concerning the Company’s directors is incorporated by reference from the sections captioned “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” contained in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”), related to it’s 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) no later than April 30, 2002 or will be provided in an amendment to this Form 10-K to be filed with the SEC no later than April 30, 2002.

Identification of Executive Officers

      The information required by this Item concerning the Company’s executive officers is set forth in Part I of this Report.

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

      The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the section captioned “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12.   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

      The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the section captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” contained in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13.   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

      In January 2001, the Company engaged W.R. Hambrecht & Co. (“WRH & Co.”), an investment bank in which Mr. Hambrecht, a director of the Company, is a partner, to provide certain financial advisory services to the Company. As of April 2001, WRH & Co. had rendered an insignificant level of services to the Company under this arrangement.

      Other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the sections captioned “Certain Transactions” and “Executive Compensation” contained in the Proxy Statement.

35

PART IV

ITEM 14.   EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

36

37

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, an amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the twenty-ninth day of March 2002.

      KNOW BY ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Donald L. Rich, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution for him, and in his name in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, and any of them, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

38

Castelle
Consolidated Financial Statements
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000
and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2001

Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Castelle

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 14 (a)(1) on page 36 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Castelle and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 14(a)(2) on page 36 present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
February 21, 2002

Castelle
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-2

Castelle
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

Castelle
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

Castelle
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

Castelle
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-6

Castelle
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements