e10vk
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal period ended
December 31, 2006
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number
000-51064
GREAT WOLF RESORTS,
INC.
(Exact name of issuer as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
51-0510250
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
122 West Washington
Avenue
|
|
53703
|
Madison, Wisconsin
53703
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code
608
661-4700
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title Of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value
$0.01 per share
|
|
NASDAQ National Market
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well
known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the
voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant was approximately $342,125,111 based on the closing
price on the NASDAQ National Market for such shares.
The number of shares outstanding of the issuers common
stock was 30,562,550 as of March 5, 2007.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III. A
definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Regulation 14A will
be filed with the Commission no later than April 30, 2007.
Great
Wolf Resorts, Inc.
Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2006
INDEX
1
PART I
Overview
and Development
The terms Great Wolf Resorts, us,
we and our are used in this report to
refer to Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All dollar amounts used in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are in thousands, except per share amounts and operating
statistics.
We are a family entertainment resort company that provides our
guests with a high-quality vacation at an affordable price. We
are the largest owner, operator and developer in North America
of drive-to family resorts featuring indoor waterparks and other
family-oriented entertainment activities. Our resorts generally
feature approximately 270 to 400 family suites that sleep from
six to ten people and each includes a wet bar, microwave oven,
refrigerator and dining and sitting area. We provide a
full-service entertainment resort experience to our target
customer base: families with children ranging in ages from 2 to
14 years old that live within a convenient driving distance
of our resorts. We operate under our Great Wolf
Lodge®
and Blue Harbor Resort brand names. Our resorts are open
year-round and provide a consistent, comfortable environment
where our guests can enjoy our various amenities and activities.
We provide our guests with a self-contained vacation experience
and focus on capturing a significant portion of their total
vacation spending. We earn revenues through the sale of rooms,
which includes admission to our indoor waterpark, and other
revenue-generating resort amenities. Each of our resorts
features a combination of the following revenue-generating
amenities: themed restaurants, an ice cream shop and
confectionery, full-service spa, game arcade, gift shop and
meeting space. We also generate revenues from licensing
arrangements, management fees and other fees with respect to
properties owned in whole or in part by third parties.
We own and operate seven Great Wolf Lodge resorts (our signature
northwoods-themed resorts), four of which we own 100%, one of
which is owned by a joint venture in which we have an 84%
interest, two of which are owned by a joint venture in which we
have a 30% interest, and one Blue Harbor Resort (a
nautical-themed property), of which we own 100%. We are also the
licensor and manager of an additional Great Wolf Lodge resort in
Niagara Falls, Ontario that is owned by an affiliate of Ripley
Entertainment Inc., or Ripleys. We anticipate that most of
our future resorts will be developed under our Great Wolf Lodge
brand, but we may develop additional nautical-themed or other
resorts in appropriate markets.
We are a Delaware Corporation formed in May 2004 to succeed to
the family entertainment resort business of our predecessor
companies, The Great Lakes Companies, Inc. and a number of its
related entities. We refer to these entities collectively as
Great Lakes. Great Lakes developed and operated hotels between
1995 and December 2004. In 1999, Great Lakes began its resort
operations by purchasing the Great Wolf Lodge in Wisconsin
Dells, Wisconsin and developing the Great Wolf Lodge in
Sandusky, Ohio, which opened in 2001. In 2003, Great Lakes
opened two additional Great Wolf Lodge resorts, one in Traverse
City, Michigan and the other in Kansas City, Kansas. In June
2004, Great Lakes opened the Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan,
Wisconsin. Immediately prior to the closing of our initial
public offering of common stock, which we refer to as the IPO,
Great Lakes had two additional Great Wolf Lodge resorts under
construction, one in Williamsburg, Virginia and the other in the
Pocono Mountains region of Pennsylvania. Our Williamsburg resort
opened in March 2005 and our Pocono Mountains resort opened in
October 2005.
On December 20, 2004, in connection with the closing of the
IPO, we acquired each of these resorts and the resorts then
under construction, as well as certain resort development and
management operations, in exchange for an aggregate of
14,032,896 shares of our common stock and $97,600, in a
series of transactions we refer to in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
as the formation transactions. We also realized net proceeds of
$248,700 from the sale of 16,100,000 shares of our common
stock in the IPO.
Financial information regarding our reportable segments during
2006 may be found in Note 2 of our Notes to Consolidated
and Combined Financial Statements.
2
Properties
Overview
The following table presents an overview of our portfolio of
operating resorts and resorts under construction. As of
December 31, 2006, we operate eight Great Wolf Lodge
resorts (our signature northwoods-themed resorts), and one Blue
Harbor Resort (a nautical-themed property).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indoor
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entertainment
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Opening
|
|
Guest Suites
|
|
|
Condo Units
|
|
|
Area(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Approx.
ft2)
|
|
|
Existing Resorts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Dells, WI(2)
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
1997
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
Sandusky, OH(2)
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
2001
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
Traverse City, MI
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2003
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
Kansas City, KS
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2003
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,000
|
|
Sheboygan, WI
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2004
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
Williamsburg, VA
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2005
|
|
|
301
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
Pocono Mountains, PA
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2005
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,000
|
|
Niagara Falls, ONT(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2006
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,000
|
|
Mason, OH(5)
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,000
|
|
Resorts Under
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grapevine, TX(6)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Late 2007
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,000
|
|
Grand Mound, WA(7)
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
Early 2008
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our indoor entertainment areas generally include our indoor
waterpark, game arcade, childrens activity room and
fitness room, as well as our Aveda spa in the resorts that have
such amenities. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2005, we formed a joint venture with CNL Income Properties,
Inc. (CNL), a real estate investment trust focused on leisure
and lifestyle properties. The joint venture acquired our
Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts. CNL owns a 70% interest in
the joint venture, and we retained a 30% interest. CNL paid us
approximately $80 million for its 70% ownership interest.
We continue to operate the properties and license the Great Wolf
Lodge brand to the joint venture under
25-year
agreements, subject to earlier termination in certain situations. |
|
(3) |
|
Construction for the expansion of 104 additional guest suites,
conference center space and waterpark attractions began in May
2006. The additional waterpark attractions were completed in
December 2006. We expect to complete the additional guest suites
and conference center space in Spring 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
An affiliate of Ripley Entertainment, Inc. (Ripley), our
licensee, owns this resort. We have granted Ripley a license to
use the Great Wolf Lodge name for this resort through April
2016. We manage the resort on behalf of Ripley and also provide
central reservation services. |
|
(5) |
|
We have entered into a joint venture agreement with a subsidiary
of CBS Corporation (CBS), to build this resort and attached
conference center. We operate the resort under our Great Wolf
Lodge brand and have a majority of the equity in the project.
CBS has a minority equity interest in the development. This
resort opened in December 2006. The conference center is
expected to be completed in March 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
We are developing a Great Wolf Lodge resort in Grapevine, Texas.
The northwoods themed, eight-story resort will provide a
comprehensive package of first-class destination lodging
amenities and activities. Construction on the resort began in
June 2006 with expected completion in late 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
We have entered into a joint venture agreement with The
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation to build this
resort. We will operate the resort under our Great Wolf Lodge
brand. The Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation will
lease the land needed for the resort to the joint venture, and
they will have a majority equity interest in the joint venture.
Construction on the resort began in October 2006 with expected
completion in early 2008. |
3
Northwoods Lodge Theme. Each of our Great Wolf
Lodge resorts has a northwoods lodge theme. Our three-story,
approximately 5,000 to 7,800 square-foot atrium lobbies are
designed in a northwoods cabin motif with exposed timber beams,
massive stone fireplaces, mounted wolves and other northwoods
creatures and an animated two-story clocktower that provides
theatrical entertainment for our younger guests. Throughout the
common areas and in each guest suite, we use sturdy, rustic
furniture that complements the northwoods theme. We believe that
this consistent theme throughout our resorts creates a
comfortable and relaxing environment and provides a sense of
adventure and exploration that the entire family can enjoy.
Guest Suites. All of our guest suites are
themed luxury suites, ranging in size from approximately
385 square feet to 1,970 square feet. Substantially
all of the rooms in our resorts also include a private deck or
patio, although a lower percentage of rooms in our Grapevine and
Grand Mound resorts will include this type of amenity. Our
resorts offer up to nine room styles to meet the needs and
preferences of our guests, including a selection of rooms with
lofts, jacuzzis and fireplaces. Our standard rooms include two
queen beds and a third queen bed in the sleeper sofa, a wet bar,
microwave oven, refrigerator and dining and sitting area, and
can accommodate up to seven people. Our specialty rooms can
accommodate up to seven people and provide a separate area for
children, including our
KidCabin®
suites that feature a log cabin bunk bed room, our Wolf Den
suites that feature a themed den enclosure with bunk beds and
our KidKamp suites that feature bunk beds in a themed tent
enclosure. We also offer larger rooms, such as our Majestic Bear
suite, which has a separate bedroom with a king bed, a large
dining and living area and can accommodate up to eight people.
Our guest suites have wallpaper, artwork and linens that
continue the northwoods theme and provide for full room service,
pay-per-view
movies and
pay-per-play
video games.
Indoor Waterparks. Our existing Great Wolf
Lodge indoor waterparks are maintained at a warm and comfortable
temperature, range in size from approximately 34,000 to
78,000 square feet and have a northwoods theme, including,
decorative rockwork and plantings, all of which is contained in
a five-story or taller wooden beam structure. The focus of each
Great Wolf Lodge waterpark is our signature 12-level treehouse
waterfort. The fort is an interactive water experience for the
entire family that features over 60 water effects, including
spray guns, fountains, valves and hoses, has cargo netting and
suspension bridges and is capped by an oversized bucket that
dumps between 700 and 1,000 gallons of water every five minutes.
Our Blue Harbor Resort has a 43,000 square-foot Breaker Bay
waterpark including our 12-level Lighthouse Pier waterfort
featuring a 1,000-gallon tipping ship.
Our waterparks also feature high-speed body slides and inner
tube waterslides that wind in and out of the building into a
splash-down pool, smaller slides for younger children,
zero-depth water activity pools for young children with geysers,
a water curtain, fountains and tumble buckets, a lazy river,
additional activity pools for basketball, open swimming and
other water activities and two large free-form hot tubs, one of
which is for adults only. Each waterpark is constructed with a
special nonslip floor surface for maximum traction and has ample
deck space and good sight lines to enhance parental oversight.
Our resorts under construction will have indoor waterparks
ranging in size from approximately 56,000 to 76,000 square
feet.
Approximately one million gallons of water are cycled through
each of our waterparks every hour in order to ensure
cleanliness. Our primary operating equipment includes standard
water pumps, tanks and filters, located in separate spaces to
allow for quick repairs or replacement. Computerized water and
air treatment systems and highly trained technicians
continuously monitor the water and air quality of our waterparks
in order to ensure a clean and safe environment. We seek to
minimize the use of chlorine. Most of the water purification is
performed by an advanced ozone water treatment system, which
ensures the highest water quality and an absence of the typical
chlorine odor found in indoor pools. In addition, the water
within each area circulates every hour to maximize hygiene. Each
waterpark area has its own water system so that a problem with
any one area can be quickly contained and does not affect the
operations of the rest of the waterpark.
We expect recurring annual capital expenditures for each resort
to be approximately 3-4% of the resorts revenues,
including the repair and maintenance of our waterpark equipment.
As much of the equipment used in our waterparks is designed for
outdoor application and capable of withstanding intense physical
use and the elements year-round, wear and tear is minimal and we
believe our equipment has a long useful life. In
4
addition, our water purification system minimizes airborne
chemicals and their potentially corrosive effects on materials
and equipment and helps extend the life of our equipment.
The safety of our guests is a primary focus in our waterparks.
Our lifeguards receive one of the highest levels of training and
certification in the industry, provided by Jeff Ellis &
Associates, Inc. (Ellis & Associates), an international
aquatic safety consulting company. Ellis & Associates
conducts quarterly unannounced safety inspections at each of our
resorts to ensure that proper safety measures and procedures are
maintained. All of our on duty lifeguards perform daily training
exercises under the supervision of a certified instructor. We
also encourage our lifeguards to obtain EMT certification, and
we reimburse them for the costs of the training.
Our indoor waterparks are generally open from 8:30 a.m.
until 10:00 p.m. seven days a week and admission is
generally only available to resort guests. Our general
guests-only policy, which is in effect at all of our resorts
other than our Sheboygan resort, allows our guests to avoid the
long lines and other inconveniences of daily admission-based
waterparks.
Amenities. Each of our existing resorts
features, and each of our resorts under construction will
feature, a combination of the following amenities. Some of the
amenities described below have different names at certain of our
Great Wolf Lodge resorts. Our Blue Harbor resort amenities have
similar appropriate nautical-themed names.
|
|
|
|
|
Themed Restaurants. Our resorts feature one or
more full-service, themed restaurants and a themed bar and
grille that serves alcoholic beverages and sandwiches. Our
themed restaurants include the Gitchigoomie Grill, with a
life-sized sea plane suspended over the dining area, Lumber
Jacks Cook Shanty, the Loose Moose Bar & Grill,
and the Camp Critter Bar & Grille, which features a
two-story realistic tree with a canopy of leaves and
canvas-topped booths with hanging lanterns, giving guests the
impression that they are dining in a northwoods forest campsite.
Our Blue Harbor Resort features our On the Rocks Bar &
Grille and Rusty Anchor Buffet.
|
|
|
|
Ice Cream Shop and Confectionery. Each of our
Great Wolf Lodge resorts, with the exception of our Sandusky
resort, has a Bear Claw Café ice cream shop and
confectionery that provides sandwiches,
Starbucks®
coffee, pastries, ice cream, candies, home-made fudge and other
snacks that families can share together. Our Blue Harbor Resort
has a Sweetshop Landing confectionery.
|
|
|
|
Snack Bar. Each of our waterparks has a snack
bar that offers a variety of sandwiches, pizzas and similar
foods with ample seating so that our guests do not have to leave
the warmth and comfort of the waterparks.
|
|
|
|
Gift Shop. Each of our resorts has a Buckhorn
Exchange or Precious Cargo gift shop that provides unique themed
gifts, including Great Wolf Lodge logo merchandise, souvenirs,
collectibles and stuffed animals. The gift shop also offers
resort toys, swimwear and personal necessities.
|
|
|
|
Full-Service Spa. Each of our resorts, with
the exception of our Sandusky resort, has an Aveda or Cameo spa
that provides a relaxing
get-a-way
with a full complement of massages, facials, manicures,
pedicures and other spa treatments, as well as yoga classes and
a wide selection of Aveda products.
|
|
|
|
Game Arcade. Our Youkon Jacks or
Northern Lights game arcades range in size from approximately
3,900 to 7,000 square feet, have over 70 games of skill and
are divided into distinct areas with video and skill games that
appeal to children of different ages. Tickets won from the games
may be exchanged for a wide selection of merchandise that
appeals to our younger guests.
|
|
|
|
Cub Club. Our Cub Club rooms are
professionally staffed childrens activity rooms with
programmed activities, including arts and crafts, games and
nature hikes. Cub Club is a frequent guest program for our
younger guests. Cub Club membership is open to all children who
have stayed at one of our resorts and includes a periodic
newsletter, exclusive offers, rewards for each stay and a free
meal and dessert when members visit during their birthday month.
We currently have approximately 40,000 Cub Club members. Our
Blue Harbor Resort features a Crew Club frequent guest program
and activities that are similar to our Cub Club.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Animated Clocktower. Each of our Great Wolf
Lodge resorts has a two-story animated clocktower located in the
resorts main atrium lobby. The clocktower provides daily
theatrical entertainment through talking and singing trees,
animals and northwoods figures. Our Blue Harbor Resort features
a 2,000-gallon water fountain featuring a hand-blown glass
sculpture and a music and light show located in its main atrium
lobby.
|
|
|
|
Outdoor Water Amenities. Outdoor water
amenities complement our indoor waterpark facilities and allow
our guests to take advantage of favorable weather conditions.
Our outdoor water amenities include activity pools and a large
deck or patio area and are generally open from May until
September. Our Wisconsin Dells resort also has outdoor
waterslides.
|
|
|
|
Fitness Room. Our fitness rooms contain
aerobic exercise equipment and weight-lifting machines with
numerous televisions for active viewing.
|
|
|
|
Meeting Space. Our resorts offer meeting rooms
ranging from approximately 3,000 to over 7,000 square feet
that are available for guest meetings, including a 99-seat,
state-of-the-art,
symposium-style room at our Traverse City, Niagara,
Williamsburg, and Pocono Mountains resorts. Our resorts under
development or construction will have meeting, or conference
space ranging in size from approximately 9,000 to
40,000 square feet.
|
|
|
|
Conference Facility. Our Blue Harbor Resort
features an approximately 21,000 square-foot attached
conference facility that provides spaces ranging from
approximately 1,000 square feet to 10,000 square feet
for a number of different types of conferences and conventions.
Our Mason resort will feature a
state-of-the-art
40,000 square-foot conference center, which will include an
expansive Grand Ballroom, flexible meeting spaces, an executive
boardroom, audio visual systems, and multiple pre-function
concourses including an outdoor patio.
|
|
|
|
Wileys Woods. Wileys Woods is an
interactive indoor live video game in a four-story,
approximately 16,000 square-foot structure located at our
Wisconsin Dells resort. Children ages three and older wear
electronic wrist bands and gain points by navigating slides,
bridges, nets and mazes and performing a variety of tasks on
over 60 machines and gadgets. Admission to Wileys Woods is
free for all resort guests and is open to the public for a fee.
|
|
|
|
MagiQuest. Our Pocono Mountains and
Williamsburg resorts feature a
MagiQuest®
attraction. MagiQuest is a high-tech, interactive fantasy
entertainment game that guests can play throughout the resort.
We are evaluating the desirability of adding this attraction to
some of our other resorts.
|
|
|
|
Minigolf. Our Niagara and Kansas City resorts
features a custom-designed, outdoor 18 hole miniature golf
course. We are evaluating the desirability of adding this
attraction to some of our other resorts.
|
Operating
Properties
The resorts we currently operate are located in Wisconsin Dells,
Wisconsin; Sandusky, Ohio; Traverse City, Michigan; Kansas City,
Kansas; Williamsburg, Virginia; Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania;
Niagara Falls, Ontario; Mason, Ohio, and Sheboygan, Wisconsin.
Great
Wolf Lodge of Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin
Our Great Wolf Lodge, located on 16 acres in Wisconsin
Dells, Wisconsin, was originally constructed in 1997 and
acquired by Great Lakes in 1999. In October 2005, we sold this
resort to our joint venture with CNL Income Properties,
Inc. We have a 30% interest in that joint venture.
Wisconsin Dells is a renowned family vacation destination that
features a number of entertainment options, including amusement
parks, museums, live entertainment and other indoor waterparks.
According to the 2007 Travel & Tourism Market Research
Handbook, the Wisconsin Dells area attracts over
2.9 million visitors each year and in 2006 visitor
expenditures were an estimated $840,000. Wisconsin Dells is
within a
one-hour
drive from Madison, Wisconsin; a
two-hour
drive from Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and a three and one-
6
half hour drive from Chicago, Illinois. According to Applied
Geographic Solutions, Inc., there are approximately
16.4 million people who live within 180 miles of the
resort.
Great Wolf Lodge of Wisconsin Dells has 309 guest suites, with
an additional 77 individually owned, one to four bedroom
condominium units located adjacent to the resort, on a
six-acre
land parcel, and an approximately 76,000 square-foot indoor
waterpark that includes our signature treehouse waterfort. The
resort offers a number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including
a themed restaurant, Loose Moose Bar & Grill, Bear Claw
Café ice cream shop and confectionery, Youkon Jacks
game arcade, Buckhorn Exchange gift shop, full-service Aveda
spa, Wileys Woods, and meeting rooms. The resort also
includes non revenue-generating amenities, such as an animated
two-story clocktower, Cub Club room and Iron Horse fitness
center.
We currently manage, on behalf of the CNL joint venture, the
rental of all of the condominium units at this resort. The CNL
joint venture receives a rental management fee of approximately
38% of gross revenue, after deduction of certain expenses. In
addition, the CNL joint venture receives reimbursement of
certain waterpark and other expenses from the condominium
association.
Great
Wolf Lodge of Sandusky, Ohio
In March 2001, we opened our Great Bear
Lodge®
in Sandusky, Ohio, which has the same theming as each of our
Great Wolf Lodge resorts and was re-named the Great Wolf Lodge
of Sandusky in May 2004. In October 2005, we sold this resort to
our joint venture with CNL Income Properties, Inc. We have a 30%
interest in that joint venture.
Sandusky is a family destination near Cleveland, Ohio that is
well known for its amusement parks. According to the
Sandusky/FIB Erie County Visitors and Convention Bureau,
Sandusky attracts approximately eight million visitors each
year. Sandusky is within a
one-hour
drive from Cleveland, Ohio; a
two-hour
drive from Detroit, Michigan; a two and one-half-hour drive from
Columbus, Ohio; and a
three-hour
drive from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. According to Applied
Geographic Solutions, Inc., there are approximately
22.9 million people who live within 180 miles of the
resort.
Great Wolf Lodge of Sandusky is located on approximately
15 acres and has 271 guest suites and an approximately
34,000 square-foot indoor waterpark that includes our
signature treehouse waterfort, tube slides, body slides, hot
tubs and a lazy river. The resort offers a number of
revenue-enhancing amenities, including our Gitchigoomie Grill
and Lumber Jacks Cook Shanty themed restaurants, Northern
Lights game arcade, Buckhorn Exchange gift shop and meeting
rooms. The resort also includes non revenue-generating amenities
such as our animated two-story clock tower, Cub Club room and
Iron Horse fitness center.
Great
Wolf Lodge of Traverse City, Michigan
In March 2003, we opened our Great Wolf Lodge in Traverse City,
Michigan. Traverse City is a traditional family vacation
destination with skiing and lake activities. According to the
Traverse City Convention and Visitors Bureau, Traverse City
attracts approximately two million visitors each year. Traverse
City is within a
three-hour
drive from Grand Rapids, Michigan and the Saginaw/Flint,
Michigan area and a
four-hour
drive from Detroit, Michigan. This resort also draws guests from
Northern Indiana and Ohio. According to Applied Geographic
Solutions, Inc., there are approximately 7.1 million people
who live within 180 miles of the resort.
Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City is located on approximately
48 acres and has 281 guest suites and an approximately
40,000 square-foot indoor waterpark that includes our
signature treehouse waterfort and Howling Wolf family raft. The
resort offers a number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including
our Camp Critter Bar & Grille and Loose Moose Cottage
themed restaurants, Northern Lights game arcade, full-service
Aveda spa, Bear Claw Café ice cream shop and confectionery,
Buckhorn Exchange gift shop and meeting rooms. The resort also
includes non revenue-generating amenities such as our animated
two-story clocktower, Cub Club room and Iron Horse fitness
center.
7
Great
Wolf Lodge of Kansas City, Kansas
In May 2003, we opened our Great Wolf Lodge in Kansas City,
Kansas as part of the Village West tourism district that
includes a Cabelas superstore, Nebraska Furniture Mart and
the Kansas NASCAR Speedway. According to the 2007
Travel & Tourism Market Research Handbook, Kansas City
attracts approximately five million visitors each year. Kansas
City is within a
one-hour
drive from Topeka, Kansas; a two and one-half hour drive from
Jefferson City, Missouri; and a
three-hour
drive from Lincoln, Nebraska. According to Applied Geographic
Solutions, Inc., there are approximately 6.7 million people
who live within 180 miles of the resort.
Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City is located on approximately
17 acres and has 281 guest suites and an approximately
40,000 square-foot indoor waterpark that includes our
signature treehouse waterfort. The resort offers a number of
revenue-enhancing amenities, including our Camp Critter
Bar & Grille themed restaurant, Bear Claw Café ice
cream shop and confectionery, full-service Aveda spa, Northern
Lights game arcade, Buckhorn Exchange gift shop and meeting
rooms. The resort also includes non revenue-generating amenities
such as our animated two-story clocktower, Cub Club room and
Iron Horse fitness center.
Blue
Harbor Resort of Sheboygan, Wisconsin
In June 2004, we opened our Blue Harbor Resort on an
approximately
12-acre
property on the shores of Lake Michigan in Sheboygan, Wisconsin.
Sheboygan is a family vacation destination featuring lake
activities and golf. Due to the nature of Sheboygan as a family
vacation destination on the water, we designed this resort with
a nautical theme rather than our typical northwoods lodge theme.
This resort is styled as a grand beach resort and decorated in a
manner consistent with that theme, including a nautical themed
lobby and specialty rooms such as the KidAquarium Suite with
bunk beds surrounded by walls of deep blue sea and schools of
fish and the Boathouse Suite with rowboat bunk beds. According
to the Sheboygan Convention and Visitors Bureau, visitors to
Sheboygan County spent approximately $283,000 in 2005. Sheboygan
is within a
one-hour
drive from Milwaukee and Green Bay, Wisconsin; a
two-hour
drive from Madison, Wisconsin; a
three-hour
drive from Chicago, Illinois; and a
four-hour
drive from Dubuque, Iowa. According to Applied Geographic
Solutions, Inc., there are approximately 18.7 million
people who live within 180 miles of the resort.
Blue Harbor Resort has 182 guest suites, with an additional 64
individually-owned, two and four bedroom condominium units
located adjacent to the resort, and an approximately
43,000 square-foot Breaker Bay indoor waterpark with a
12-level Lighthouse Pier waterfort. The resort offers a
number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including our
nautical-themed On the Rocks Bar & Grille and Rusty
Anchor Buffet restaurants, Sweetshop Landing ice cream shop and
confectionery, full-service Aveda spa, Northern Lights game
arcade and Precious Cargo gift shop. This resort also has an
approximately 21,000 square-foot attached conference
facility capable of seating 1,000 people. The resort offers
non revenue-generating amenities such as our 2,000 gallon
hand-blown glass water fountain featuring a music and light
show, Crew Club for kids and Ship Shape Place fitness center.
Admission to the indoor waterpark is available to residents of
Sheboygan County for a fee.
We currently manage the rental of substantially all of the
condominium units at this resort. We receive a rental management
fee of approximately 38% of gross revenue. In addition, we
receive reimbursement of certain waterpark expenses through the
condominium association.
Great
Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg, Virginia
In March 2005, we opened our Great Wolf Lodge in Williamsburg,
Virginia on an
83-acre
site. Williamsburg is a popular family vacation destination with
amusement parks, waterparks and other entertainment attractions.
According to the 2007 Travel & Tourism Market Research
Handbook, the Williamsburg area attracts 4 million visitors
each year, which bring in an estimated $632,000 in visitor
spending. Williamsburg is a
one-hour
drive from Richmond, Virginia; a two and one-half-hour drive
from Washington, D.C.; a
three-hour
drive from Baltimore, Maryland; and a three and one-half-hour
drive from Raleigh, North Carolina. According to Applied
Geographic Solutions, Inc., there are approximately
16.6 million people who live within 180 miles of the
resort.
8
The resort occupies approximately 36 acres of the site. We
may sell a portion of the excess land as out-lots and retain the
remaining acreage to support future expansion of the resort.
Great Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg has 301 guest suites and an
approximately 67,000 square-foot indoor waterpark that
includes our signature treehouse waterfort. We are currently
constructing an expansion of 104 additional rooms as well
as a conference center that will be approximately
10,000 square-feet.
The resort offers a number of revenue-enhancing amenities,
including themed restaurants, a full-service Aveda spa, game
arcade, Bear Claw Café ice cream shop and confectionery,
gift shop, MagiQuest and approximately 7,000 square feet of
meeting rooms. The resort offers non revenue-generating
amenities such as a two-story animated clocktower, Cub Club room
and fitness center.
Great
Wolf Lodge of the Pocono Mountains
In October 2005, we opened our Great Wolf Lodge in the Pocono
Mountains on a
95-acre site
near Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. The Pocono Mountains area is a
popular family vacation destination featuring family-oriented
attractions and recreational activities. According to the 2007
Travel & Tourism Market Research Handbook, the Pocono
Mountains region attracts approximately eight million visitors
each year. The resort is located within a one and one-half-hour
drive from New York, New York; a two- hour drive from
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; a three and one-half hour drive from
Baltimore, Maryland and a
four-hour
drive from Washington, D.C. According to Applied Geographic
Solutions, Inc., there are approximately 44.3 million
people who live within 180 miles of the resort.
Our Great Wolf Lodge of the Pocono Mountains has 401 guest
suites and an approximately 78,000 square-foot indoor
waterpark that includes our signature treehouse waterfort. The
resort offers a number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including
a themed restaurant and bar and grille, full-service Aveda spa,
game arcade, gift shop, MagiQuest and approximately
7,900 square feet of meeting rooms. The resort also
includes non revenue-generating amenities such as a two-story
animated clocktower, Cub Club room and fitness center.
Great
Wolf Lodge of Niagara Falls, Ontario
In January 2004, Great Lakes entered into a license agreement
with Ripleys that authorizes Ripleys to develop and
operate a Great Wolf Lodge resort in Niagara Falls, Ontario. In
addition, the agreement allows Ripleys to use certain
licensed trademarks, such as Cub Club,
KidCabin, Wileys Woods and
Great Wolf Lodge. The term of the license agreement
is ten years, with the possibility of up to four successive
five-year renewals. Under the license agreement, Ripleys
is required to pay a monthly license fee, a brand marketing fee
that we are obligated to contribute to a marketing program and a
fee related to furniture, fixtures and equipment
start-up
costs. We may terminate the license agreement at any time, upon
notice, if Ripleys fails to meet its material obligations
under the agreement. These obligations require Ripleys to
meet payment obligations in a timely manner, maintain and
operate the resort in a manner consistent with our operating
standards and obtain our approval prior to the use of any of our
licensed trademarks. In addition, these material obligations
restrict Ripleys to selling only products, goods and
services that we approve and from developing or managing a hotel
with an indoor waterpark within the United States until, at the
earliest, January 2016.
In April 2006, we opened the Great Wolf Lodge in Niagara Falls.
Niagara Falls is a popular family vacation destination.
According to the City of Niagara Falls, Ontario website, Niagara
Falls attracts over 14 million visitors each year. Niagara
Falls is less than a one hour drive from Buffalo, New York; a
one and one-half-hour drive from Toronto, Ontario; and a two and
one-half-hour drive from Syracuse, New York. According to
Applied Geographic Solutions, Inc., there are approximately
8.2 million people in the United States and
9.6 million people in Canada, who live within
180 miles of the resort.
Great Wolf Lodge of Niagara Falls has 406 guest suites with an
approximately 82,000 square-foot indoor waterpark. The
resort offers a number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including
themed restaurants, ice cream shop and confectionery,
full-service Aveda spa, game arcade, gift shop and meeting
space. The resort also includes non revenue-generating amenities
such as a two-story animated clocktower, Cub Club room and
fitness center.
9
Great
Wolf Lodge of Mason, Ohio
In December 2006, we opened our Great Wolf Lodge in Mason, Ohio
on a 39-acre
land parcel at Kings Island, in Mason, Ohio. We will operate the
resort under the Great Wolf Lodge brand and have a majority
equity position in the project. A unit of CBS Corporation
owns a minority equity interest in the development as a result
of contributing the land needed for the resort. Mason is a
popular family destination featuring family-oriented attractions
and recreational activities. According to the 2007
Travel & Tourism Market Research Handbook, the
Mason/Cincinnati metro area attract five million visitors per
year, which brings in an estimated $3,400,000 in visitor
spending. The resort is located within a thirty-minute dive from
Cincinnati, Ohio. According to Applied Geographic Solutions,
Inc., there are approximately 16.4 million people who live
within 180 miles of the resort.
Our Great Wolf Lodge of Mason, Ohio has 401 guest suites and an
approximately 75,000 square-foot indoor waterpark. The
resort offers a number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including
family restaurants, a full-service Aveda spa, game arcade, gift
shop, and confectionery. The resort also includes non
revenue-generating amenities such as a fitness center and
outdoor recreation area. In March 2007 we expect to open a
state-of-the-art
40,000 square-foot conference center, including an
expansive Grand Ballroom, flexible meeting spaces, an executive
boardroom, audio and visual systems, and multiple pre-function
concourses including an outdoor patio.
Properties
Under Construction
Great
Wolf Lodge of Grapevine, Texas
In 2005, we purchased a
51-acre site
in Grapevine, Texas, for development of a Great Wolf Lodge
resort. Grapevine is a popular family destination featuring
family-oriented attractions and recreational activities. The
resort will be a thirty-minute drive from Dallas and
Fort Worth. The Dallas and Fort Worth region is the
7th largest market area in the United States, and the
resort will have a higher population within a
60-mile
radius than any existing Great Wolf Lodge resort.
Upon completion, Great Wolf Lodge of Grapevine, Texas will have
404 guest suites and an approximately 76,000 square-foot
indoor waterpark. The resort will offer a number of
revenue-enhancing amenities, including family restaurants, a
full-service Aveda spa, game arcade, gift shop and
confectionery. The resort will also include non
revenue-generating amenities such as a fitness center and
outdoor recreation area. We anticipate that this resort will
open in late 2007.
Great
Wolf Lodge of Grand Mound, Washington
In 2005, we entered into a joint venture with The Confederated
Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation to develop a Great Wolf Lodge
resort and conference center on a
39-acre land
parcel in Grand Mound, Washington. We expect that we will
operate the resort under the Great Wolf Lodge brand, that The
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation will lease the
land needed for the resort on very favorable terms, and that
both parties will maintain equity positions in the joint
venture. Construction on the resort began in October 2006. The
resort will be the first family destination vacation resort with
an indoor waterpark in the Pacific Northwest. Chehalis is an
hour and half drive from Seattle, Washington and Portland,
Oregon. There are approximately 7.7 million people who live
within 180 miles of the resort.
Upon completion, Great Wolf Lodge of Chehalis, Washington will
have 393 guest suites and an approximately
56,000 square-foot indoor waterpark. The resort will offer
a number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including family
restaurants, a full-service Aveda spa, game arcade, gift shop,
confectionery and an approximately 30,000 square-foot
conference center. The resort also will include non
revenue-generating amenities such as a fitness center and
outdoor recreation area. We anticipate that this resort will
open in early 2008.
10
Business
and Growth Strategies
Our primary business objective is to increase long-term
stockholder value by executing our internal and external growth
strategies. Our primary internal growth strategies are to:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase Total Resort Revenue. We intend to
increase total resort revenue by increasing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Room Rate: We plan to increase
our average room rate over time by driving demand for our
resorts and focusing on yield management techniques. We intend
to increase demand through intelligent sales, marketing and
public relations efforts, by increasing our visibility and by
enhancing our brand image. We plan to employ our yield
management techniques to project demand in order to effectively
direct our sales and marketing efforts and selectively increase
room rates. We believe that our focus on optimizing the
relationship between room rates and occupancies will allow us to
maximize profitability.
|
|
|
|
Average Occupancy: We intend to maintain high
occupancy levels during peak times and will focus on increasing
our off-peak occupancies. Our off-peak occupancy levels
generally occur in May, September and during the middle of the
week. Our occupancy levels are affected by school calendars,
with the summer months, weekends, spring break period and other
school holidays achieving the highest occupancy levels. We will
continue to seek to improve off-peak occupancy levels by holding
special events and targeting group sales and conferences.
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue: We provide our guests with a
self-contained vacation experience and attempt to capture a
significant portion of their spending on food and beverage,
entertainment and merchandise. Each of our resorts generally
contains at least one themed restaurant, an ice cream shop and
confectionery, snack shop, an Aveda spa, gift shop and game
arcade. The average non-room revenue, including the revenue from
these amenities, was approximately $122 per occupied room
night for the year ended December 31, 2006. By providing
these additional revenue-generating amenities, we seek to
maximize the amount of time and money spent
on-site by
our guests. We have also entered into a number of co-marketing
agreements with strategic partners and expect to enter into
additional co-marketing agreements in the future in order to
increase other revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Our Economies of Scale. We will take
advantage of the following economies of scale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased Purchasing Power: We intend to
capitalize on our increasing purchasing power with respect to
operating supplies, food and beverage, insurance and employee
benefits. As the number of resorts we own and operate increases,
we expect to be able to leverage our increased buying volume and
power to obtain more advantageous and predictable pricing on
commodity goods and services. We have entered into an
arrangement with a nationally-recognized hospitality procurement
company to further leverage our buying power. In addition, we
intend to continue to manage increases and fluctuations in the
cost of electricity, water and natural gas for our resorts by
entering into volume-based contracts where we are able to do so.
|
|
|
|
Centralized Services: By centralizing certain
of our services, we focus on decreasing our
per-unit
costs, increasing our control over those services and be in a
position to deliver a greater quality of service to our
customers. For example, our central reservations call center
operates every day of the year, has approximately 144 full and
part-time employees and accepts reservations for all of our
resorts. The call center also has the capacity to efficiently
handle high call volumes and should require only limited
additional incremental costs over the next several years as we
increase our portfolio of resorts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Build Upon Our Existing Brand Awareness and
Loyalty. Our Great Wolf Lodge brand is symbolized
by our distinctive and easily identifiable theming, from our
captivating northwoods exterior, to our signature treehouse
waterfort, to our mascots and recognizable logos and
merchandise. We believe we have fostered strong customer and
brand loyalty, which is evidenced by our high levels of repeat
and referral guests. We will continue to focus on ensuring that
each of our guests associates the Great Wolf Lodge brand with a
memorable and consistent family vacation experience.
|
11
Our primary external growth strategies are to:
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalize on First-Mover Advantage. We intend
to be the first to develop and operate family entertainment
resorts featuring indoor waterparks in our selected target
markets. We intend to continue to leverage our development
expertise, existing platform and model and our access to capital
to take advantage of the significant barriers to entry
associated with the development of large family entertainment
resorts with indoor waterparks like our Great Wolf Lodge
resorts. We will seek to set the standard for quality, build on
visible sites and capitalize on the opportunity to be located
near other popular local attractions that draw our target
customers. We believe that the combination of our first mover
advantage and the significant barriers to entry in our target
markets provide us with a competitive advantage.
|
|
|
|
Focus on Development and Strategic Growth
Opportunities. Family entertainment resorts
featuring indoor waterparks are a relatively new concept and a
growing segment of the resort and entertainment industries. We
intend to focus on this growth opportunity by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building in Target Markets: We intend to
develop additional resorts, including resorts in major domestic
markets with us as the sole or majority owner, as well as
licensed or minority-owned resorts in secondary U.S. and/or
international markets. A new resort, from market selection to
opening, can take over four years to develop and build. We
believe that our experience will enable us to more efficiently
develop and build new resorts in our target markets.
|
|
|
|
Selective Sales of Ownership Interests/Recycling of
Capital: We will selectively consider
opportunities to sell partial or whole interests in one or more
of our owned and operated properties, as we did in our CNL joint
venture. We intend to continue to manage all of our branded
Great Wolf Lodge resorts, and we will consider transactions that
allow us to maintain our management/licensing position at a
resort while realizing value created through our development
expertise. In those situations, we expect then to recycle
capital generated by such transactions for investment in future
growth opportunities.
|
|
|
|
Licensing Our Resort Concept
Internationally: We plan to selectively seek
licensing and management opportunities internationally. Similar
to our arrangement with Ripleys in Niagara Falls, Ontario,
we intend to enter into license and management agreements with
reputable companies that have local market knowledge in order to
increase revenues and expand the reach of our Great Wolf Lodge
brand.
|
|
|
|
Forming Strategic Partnerships: We will
consider strategic partnerships on a selective basis. For
example, we have entered into joint ventures with a unit of
CBS Corporation, CNL Income Properties, and The
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation.
|
|
|
|
Expanding and Enhancing Existing Resorts: We
intend to continue to focus on growth opportunities at our
existing resorts by adding revenue-enhancing features that drive
ancillary vacation spending to certain of our resorts and meet
our target returns, including non-water based attractions. We
also intend to continue to evaluate incremental
revenue-generating opportunities, such as expanding the number
of rooms and adding condominium units at certain of our resorts.
In addition, we will consider adding conference centers at
existing resorts to capture convention and other business travel
revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue to Innovate. We intend to leverage
our in-house expertise, in conjunction with the knowledge and
experience of our third-party suppliers and designers, to
develop and implement the latest innovations in family
entertainment activities and amenities, including waterpark
attractions. We have received numerous industry awards for our
guests experiences, our operations, innovative
development, sales and marketing initiatives and materials, and
employee retention.
|
12
Our
Competitive Strengths
We are the market leader for family entertainment resorts that
feature indoor waterparks and other family-oriented amenities in
North America. Our competitive strengths include:
|
|
|
|
|
Unforgettable Family Resort Experience. Each
of our resorts provides a welcome opportunity for families to
spend quality time together, relax and reconnect. In addition to
our indoor waterparks, our resorts provide other activities and
amenities that the entire family can enjoy together. Our family
amenities and activities include themed restaurants, a game
arcade, ice cream shop and confectionery, gift shop, snack shop,
animated clocktower and fireside bedtime stories. We also have
amenities and activities tailored to each member of the family,
including our full-service Aveda spa, Cub Club for kids and
fitness room. Our resorts also offer special events, including
seasonal and holiday activities, wild animal and nature
educational programs and other special events. We believe that
our focus on delivering an unforgettable family resort
experience appeals to our target customers and results in repeat
visits and referrals. For the year ended December 31, 2006,
we generated approximately 49% of our room revenue from repeat
visitors and referral guests.
|
|
|
|
Value, Comfort and Convenience. Guest rooms at
each of our resorts are spacious and comfortable suites that
generally range in size from approximately 385 square feet
to 1,970 square feet and include a wet bar, microwave,
refrigerator and dining and sitting area. Many of the suites
have specific themes that are geared toward enhancing our
younger guests experience, including our KidCabin and Wolf
Den Suites, which have a partitioned room with bunk beds
designed as log cabins and northwoods forest dens, respectively.
All of our resorts are within a convenient driving distance of
our large target customer bases. Because our indoor waterparks
and our other amenities generally are not impacted by weather
conditions, we offer our guests a reliable experience. On
average, a two-night stay at our resorts costs a family of four
approximately $700, making it a very affordable family vacation
option.
|
|
|
|
Favorable Market Trends. We believe recent
vacation trends favor our Great Wolf Lodge concept as the number
of families choosing to take shorter, more frequent vacations
that they can drive to have increased in recent years. We
believe that these trends will continue and that we are well
positioned to take advantage of them. We believe our resorts are
less affected by changes in economic cycles, as drive-to
destinations are less expensive and more convenient than
destinations that require air travel. In addition, we have
identified over 50 markets in the United States that, according
to Third Wave Research, each has a population in excess of five
million people located within a convenient driving distance.
|
|
|
|
Market Presence and Barriers to Entry. We are
the largest owner and operator of family entertainment resorts
with indoor waterparks in North America based on the number of
resorts in operation. We believe this market presence gives us a
significant competitive advantage in attracting guests and
efficiently developing additional resorts. In addition, we
believe the significant barriers to entry present in our
industry segment, including operational complexity, substantial
capital requirements, availability of suitable sites in
desirable markets and a difficult, multi-year permitting
process, discourage other companies in the lodging and
entertainment industries from developing similar family
entertainment resorts. A new Great Wolf Lodge resort typically
takes from one to three years to develop, which includes market
selection, site selection and permitting, an additional 15 to
18 months to build and costs in excess of $100,000.
|
|
|
|
Focus on Safety. We invest heavily in safety
measures in the design and operation of our resorts. For
example, we specifically design our waterparks with attention to
sightlines and safety precautions and use one of the most
respected training methods in the water safety industry to train
each of our lifeguards. We design and construct our indoor
waterparks with
state-of-the-art
air quality and water treatment systems. We also maintain and
periodically upgrade our facilities to ensure that we provide
our guests with
best-in-class
safety measures and systems.
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team and Committed and Motivated
Staff. Our senior management team has significant
experience in the hospitality, family resort and real estate
development industries and
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
has significant expertise in operating complex, themed, family
entertainment resorts featuring indoor waterparks. In addition,
we have a team of skilled, loyal and committed employees at each
of our resorts. We offer our resort employees a number of
benefits, including a pleasant and rewarding work environment,
career-oriented training, the ability to obtain consistent
year-round work, which is uncommon in the resort industry, and
career growth opportunities. As a result, we believe our
employees are committed to delivering a superb customer
experience and personally assuring that our guests fully enjoy
their family vacation.
|
Industry
Overview
We operate in the family entertainment resort segment of the
travel and leisure industry. The concept of a family
entertainment resort with an indoor waterpark was first
introduced to the United States in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin,
and has evolved there over the past 17 years. In an effort
to boost occupancy and daily rates, as well as capture
off-season demand, hotel operators in the Wisconsin Dells market
began expanding indoor pools and adding waterslides and other
water-based attractions to existing hotels and resorts. The
success of these efforts prompted several local operators to
build new, larger destination resorts based primarily on this
concept, including the Wilderness Hotel & Golf Resort,
Treasure Island, Raintree Resort, Kalahari and the Great Wolf
Lodge (formerly known as the Black Wolf Lodge), which Great
Lakes purchased in 1999.
We believe that these properties, which typically are themed and
include other resort features such as arcades, retail shops and
full food and beverage service in addition to the indoor
waterpark, have historically outperformed standard hotels in the
market. We believe that the rate premiums and increased market
share in the Wisconsin Dells for hotels and resorts with some
form of an indoor waterpark can be attributed to several
factors, including the ability to provide a year-round vacation
destination without weather-related risks, the wide appeal of
water-based recreation and the favorable trends in leisure
travel discussed below. Although the rate premiums and increased
market share in Wisconsin Dells have been significant, no
operator or developer other than Great Wolf Resorts has
established a regional portfolio of family entertainment resorts
featuring indoor waterparks.
No standard industry definition for a family entertainment
resort featuring an indoor waterpark has developed. A recent
Hotel & Leisure Advisors, LLC (H&LA) survey
indicates that the number of indoor waterpark destination
resorts has grown from 29 available properties as of year-end
2005 to 41 available properties as of year-end 2006. Most of our
resorts are located in well-established, traditional drive-to
family vacation destinations, which allow us to leverage the
popularity of these destinations by offering a complementary
entertainment option to existing venues and a high-quality
family resort alternative. In addition, many of these
destinations offer beaches, theme parks, waterparks, amusement
parks and many other forms of outdoor activities that are only
available on a seasonal basis. Within our enclosed resort
environment, our guests can enjoy a total resort experience year
round, regardless of weather conditions.
Resort
Operations
Each resort employs a general manager who is responsible for the
operations of the particular resort and who typically has many
years of experience in the hospitality or family entertainment
industry. Our general managers oversee a staff of 300 or more
resort employees and are assisted by an extensive management
team, including directors for each of human resources, food and
beverage, housekeeping, aquatics, maintenance, sales and
marketing and front office. A corporate-level liaison for each
department ensures consistency throughout our resorts while
allowing a particular resort to tailor its operations to best
meet the needs of its guests.
Prior to assuming responsibility for a resort, general managers
and assistant general managers undergo a proprietary management
training program designed to familiarize each trainee with
various facets of our management, operations and development
programs. The program also emphasizes our guest service policies
and provides hands-on operating experience at the resort level.
Our management training program is intended to train assistant
managers to become future general managers.
14
We strive to provide our guests with a fun and convenient
experience in a warm and family-friendly environment from the
first day a new resort opens. To achieve this, a team of
experienced management members from our existing resorts, along
with corporate liaisons, begins training personnel at our new
resorts approximately one month prior to a resorts opening
and is on site at the new resort for a month after opening. We
believe that this process ensures that the opening of a new
resort is efficient and that our culture of high quality and
friendly customer service is carried over to our new resorts,
including our guests interactions with our front desk,
housekeeping, waterpark, restaurant and other staff members. In
addition, we train our maintenance personnel to minimize any
operational problems that occur during the opening of a new
resort, including the operation of our waterparks. We believe
that these efforts help to minimize any problems associated with
opening a new resort and give our first guests a favorable,
memorable experience that will build brand loyalty.
Training
and Development
We believe that our ability to provide a warm family atmosphere
where families can relax, play and reconnect begins with our
people and their ability to deliver quality customer service. We
seek to recruit, train and retain employees who will make sure
that our guests enjoy their stay, and we seek to promote from
within our company. Each new resort employee undergoes a
week-long orientation program and is paired with a more veteran
employee for a month so that the new employee can learn more
about our resorts, our culture and how we strive to provide the
best possible customer service. Our employees are committed to
our success and focused on ensuring a memorable experience for
each of our guests. We believe that our high level of customer
service sets us apart and promotes valuable referrals and repeat
visits.
Sales and
Marketing
We place a significant emphasis on the sales and marketing of
our family-focused resorts. We work together with a third-party
consulting firm to analyze the demographics of our markets and
to identify potential guests for targeted marketing, both within
our primary market areas and beyond those areas to attract
occasional or seasonal travelers. We market to these potential
customers through a combination of television, radio, newspaper
and direct mail advertising, including advertising through local
chambers of commerce and convention and visitors bureaus. We
also rely upon repeat guests and guest referrals, as well as
brand recognition and the visibility of the resorts themselves,
which are located along major highways in high traffic areas. In
addition, our engaging website offers detailed information about
our resorts, including virtual tours and room layouts.
For new resorts, our marketing efforts begin before construction
commences and we establish sales offices to generate advance
bookings. Reservations may be made at our resorts, through our
web site or through our central reservations call center. Our
call center and highly trained staff allow us to offer
consistent specials throughout our resorts, better track room
occupancy levels and room rates and handle the high volume of
calls that are usually associated with the opening of a resort.
We maintain an in-house sales force and graphic arts department.
Our experienced staff develops products and promotions for use
in merchandising and marketing promotions. We also engage in
cross-marketing, promotions and co-marketing arrangements with
major vendors. We have received numerous awards for our general
advertising, website, print media, radio commercials and sales
presentations.
We have developed Cub Club, a frequent guest program for
children. Membership is available to all children who have
stayed at one of our resorts. The benefits of the program
include coupons and other incentives, a periodic newsletter,
access to the Cub Club activity rooms at each of our resorts and
special offers to children who visit during their birthday
month. Our Blue Harbor Resort features a Crew Club program for
children, similar to the Great Wolf Lodge resorts Cub Club.
Maintenance
and Inspections
Each of our resorts has an aquatics manager who is trained in
all aspects of water quality and safety.
On-site
maintenance personnel frequently inspect our waterparks. These
inspections include safety checks of
15
the equipment in the waterpark, as well as analyses of water and
air quality. Our water quality levels are constantly monitored
and tested by computers and by a full-time aquatics maintenance
engineer, who works with an additional assistant during our
busiest months. Our air quality system is designed to minimize
humidity and moisture
build-up,
which materially reduces maintenance costs. Furthermore, we use
Ellis & Associates as water safety consultants at our
resorts in order to train lifeguards and audit safety procedures.
Our senior management and the individual resort personnel
evaluate the risk aspects of each resorts operation,
including potential risks to the public and employees and staff.
Each resort has full-time maintenance employees on staff that
ensure building quality and fulltime aquatics maintenance
employees that ensure the ride safety and air and water quality
inside the resorts indoor waterpark. We use a state of the
art filtration system and ozonators to balance the water and air
quality within the waterpark in order to accommodate fluctuating
quantities of visitors.
Development
Criteria
We choose sites for the development of new resorts based upon a
number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Large target customer base. We select
development sites that generally have a minimum of five million
target customers within a convenient driving distance. Because
we offer an affordable vacation experience, we appeal to
families in a variety of income ranges.
|
|
|
|
Recognized tourist destination. We focus on
drive-to destinations that attract a large number of tourists,
including both emerging and traditional family vacation markets.
We believe we can charge premium rates in these markets due to
the high quality of our resorts and our family-oriented
amenities and activities. In addition, the indoor nature of many
of our amenities and activities allows us to reduce the impact
of seasonality that negatively affects other attractions in
these areas. These areas also often have active and effective
local visitors and convention bureaus that complement our
marketing and advertising efforts at little or no cost to us.
|
|
|
|
Highly visible and large sites. We generally
develop resorts in highly visible locations along major
roadways. Visibility from highways enhances easy drive-to
access, provides marketing benefits due to high volumes of
traffic and often produces synergies from adjacent land uses or
complementary developments. We generally choose sites that have
enough acreage to allow for potential expansions and future
sales of
out-lots.
|
Based upon these criteria, we have identified over 50 markets as
potential locations for our resorts.
Once we have identified a market that meets our development
criteria, we search for potential sites. Acceptable sites which
may be difficult to find in some areas. We then perform initial
analyses of the permitting process and access to utilities,
before acquiring a sufficient amount of land from one or more
landowners. Based upon the target customer base of the market,
we develop initial specifications for the resort, such as the
number of guest suites and size of the indoor waterpark and
other amenities. We also formally begin the potentially lengthy
and difficult process of obtaining the necessary approvals and
permits from the appropriate local governmental bodies,
including the necessary water rights and environmental permits.
Once the permitting process is complete, we secure financing for
the project and begin construction on the resort. This overall
development process generally takes from two to four years.
Competition
Our resorts compete with other forms of family vacation travel,
including theme parks, waterparks, amusement parks and other
recreational activities, including other resorts located near
these types of attractions. Our business is also subject to
factors that affect the recreation and leisure and resort
industries generally, such as general economic conditions and
changes in consumer spending habits. We believe that the
principal competitive factors of a family entertainment resort
include location, room rates, name recognition, reputation, the
uniqueness and perceived quality of the attractions and
amenities, the atmosphere and cleanliness of the attractions and
amenities, the quality of the lodging accommodations, the
quality of the food and beverage service, convenience, service
levels and reservation systems.
16
A recent Hotel & Leisure Advisors, LLC (H&LA)
survey indicates that the number of indoor waterpark destination
resorts has grown from 29 available properties as of year-end
2005 to 41 available properties as of year-end 2006.
As a result of our market presence and our management
teams substantial experience, we believe we have an
opportunity to capitalize on our first-mover advantage in this
industry segment and to achieve significant brand recognition.
While we believe that our first-mover advantage is very
beneficial to us, it does provide our competitors with an
opportunity to monitor our success in our chosen markets. As a
result, a competitor may choose not to enter one of our markets
based on our performance, or may subsequently develop a resort
in our markets that is newer, has additional amenities, or
offers more, larger or more exciting waterpark attractions than
our resorts.
In most of our markets, there are few, if any, other family
entertainment resorts featuring indoor waterparks. However, in
Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, where indoor waterparks were first
introduced, there are approximately 16 other resorts and hotels
with some type of indoor water-related activity or amenity. As a
result, we face significant competition from both lower priced
unthemed waterparks and larger, more expensive waterparks with
thrill rides and other attractions in the Wisconsin Dells
market. While the Wisconsin Dells market has a significant
number of resorts with indoor waterparks, we believe the
competitive landscape in that small, regional market is not
representative of the competition we may face as we further
expand our portfolio of resorts. The vast majority of indoor
waterpark resorts in Wisconsin Dells are family-owned or
privately operated businesses that have yet to develop
additional resorts outside of Wisconsin Dells. In addition, we
believe our ability to compete effectively in this highly
competitive market will enable us to more effectively compete in
other markets where we may not be the only family entertainment
resort. In addition to Wisconsin Dells, we face direct
competition from other indoor waterpark destination resorts in
the Sandusky and Traverse City areas.
We anticipate that competition within some of our markets will
increase in the foreseeable future. We believe that a number of
other resort operators are developing or considering the
development of family entertainment resorts with indoor
waterparks, which will compete with our resorts.
Governmental
Regulation
The ownership and management of our resorts, as well as our
development and construction of new resorts, subjects us to
federal, state and local laws regulating zoning, land
development, land use, building design and construction, and
other real estate-related laws and regulations. In addition, a
number of states regulate the permitting and licensing of
resorts by requiring registration, disclosure statements and
compliance with specific standards of conduct. Our failure to
maintain or acquire the requisite licenses, permits and
authorizations required by such laws and regulations, as well as
any failure on our part to comply with registration, disclosure
and standards of conduct required by such laws and regulations
could impact the operation, profitability and success of our
current resorts or the development, completion and success of
any resorts we may develop in the future. We believe that each
of our resorts has the necessary permits and approvals to
operate its business and is in material compliance with all
applicable registration, disclosure and conduct requirements. We
intend to continue to obtain such permits and approvals for any
resorts we may develop in the future or additions or renovations
to current resorts and to ensure that such resorts and additions
or renovations comply with applicable registration, disclosure
and conduct requirements.
We are also subject to laws and regulations governing our
relationship with employees, including minimum wage
requirements, overtime, working conditions and work permit
requirements. An increase in the minimum wage rate, employee
benefit costs or other costs associated with employees could
increase our overall labor costs.
The operation of our waterparks subjects us to state and local
regulations governing the quality of the water we use in our
waterparks, including bacteriological, chemical, physical and
radiological standards. In addition to inspections we conduct on
our own, state and local authorities may also conduct
inspections of our waterparks to determine our compliance with
applicable standards. If we are found to be in violation of such
regulations we could be subject to various penalties, including,
but not limited to, monetary fines and the
17
temporary closure of our waterparks. Changes in state or local
regulations could impose more stringent standards with which we
would have to comply.
We are subject to both federal and state environmental laws and
regulations, including laws and regulations governing the
discharge of water from our waterparks. Specifically, under the
requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act, we must obtain
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits from the
Environmental Protection Agency or from the state environmental
agency to which the permit program has been delegated for
discharges into waterways and comply with the permit terms
regarding wastewater quality and discharge limits. Such permits
must be renewed from
time-to-time,
as required by regulation and additional capital expenditures
for wastewater treatment systems associated with the renewal of
our water discharge permits may be required. Importantly,
changes in federal or state legislation or regulations could
impose more stringent release standards with which we would have
to comply. Currently, our resort in the Pocono Mountains is our
only property subject to such laws and regulations governing the
discharge of water and we intend to comply with these laws and
regulations as we operate that property.
As a place of public accommodation, our resorts are subject to
the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
which we refer to as the ADA. As such, our resorts are required
to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use
by disabled persons. While we believe that our resorts are
substantially in compliance with these requirements, we have not
conducted an audit or investigation of all of our resorts to
determine our compliance. Further, federal legislation or
regulations may amend the ADA to impose more stringent
requirements with which we would have to comply.
Environmental
Matters
Our operations and properties are subject to federal, state and
local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the
environment, natural resources and worker health and safety,
including laws and regulations governing and creating liability
relating to the management, storage and disposal of hazardous
substances and other regulated materials. Our properties are
also subject to various environmental laws and regulations that
govern certain aspects of our on-going operations. These laws
and regulations control such things as the nature and volume of
our wastewater discharges, quality of our water supply and our
waste management practices. The costs of complying with these
requirements, as they now exist or may be altered in the future,
could adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Because we own and operate real property, various federal, state
and local laws may impose liability on us for the costs of
removing or remediating various hazardous substances, including
substances that may be currently unknown to us, that may have
been released on or in our property or disposed by us at
third-party locations. The principal federal laws relating to
environmental contamination and associated liabilities that
could affect us are the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act; state and local governments have also adopted
separate but similar environmental laws and regulations that
vary from state to state and locality to locality. These laws
may impose liability jointly and severally, without regard to
fault and whether or not we knew of or caused the release. The
presence of hazardous substances on a property or the failure to
meet environmental regulatory requirements may materially
adversely affect our ability to use or sell the property, or to
use the property as collateral for borrowing, and may cause us
to incur substantial remediation or compliance costs. In
addition, if hazardous substances are located on or released
from one of our properties, we could incur substantial
liabilities through a private party personal injury claim, a
claim by an adjacent property owner for property damage or a
claim by a governmental entity for other damages, such as
natural resource damages. This liability may be imposed on us
under environmental laws or common-law principles.
We obtain environmental assessment reports on the properties we
own or operate as we deem appropriate. These reports have not
revealed any environmental liability or compliance concerns that
we believe would materially adversely affect our financial
condition or results of operations. However, the environmental
assessments that we have undertaken might not have revealed all
potential environmental liabilities or claims for such
liabilities. It is also possible that future laws, ordinances or
regulations or changed interpretations of existing laws and
regulations will impose material environmental liability or
compliance costs on us, that the
18
current environmental conditions of properties we own or operate
will be affected by other properties in the vicinity or by the
actions of third parties unrelated to us or that our guests
could introduce hazardous or toxic substances into the resorts
we own or manage without our knowledge and expose us to
liability under federal or state environmental laws. The costs
of defending these claims, complying with as yet unidentified
requirements, conducting this environmental remediation or
responding to such changed conditions could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
Some of our resort properties may have contained, or are
adjacent to or near other properties that have contained or
currently contain underground storage tanks for the storage of
petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. If
hazardous or toxic substances were released from these tanks, we
could incur significant costs or, with respect to tanks on our
property, be liable to third parties with respect to the
releases.
On occasion, we may elect to develop properties that have had a
history of industrial activities
and/or
historical environmental contamination. Where such opportunities
arise, we engage third-party experts to evaluate the extent of
contamination, the scope of any needed environmental
clean-up
work, and available measures (such as creation of barriers over
residual contamination and deed restrictions prohibiting
groundwater use or disturbance of the soil) for ensuring that
planned development and future property uses will not present
unacceptable human health or environmental risks or exposure to
liabilities. If those environmental assessments indicate that
the development opportunities are acceptable, we also work with
appropriate governmental agencies and obtain their approvals of
planned site
clean-up,
development activities, and the proposed future property uses.
We have followed that process in connection with the development
of our Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin where the City
of Sheboygan has arranged for environmental
clean-up
work and ongoing groundwater monitoring and we have agreed to
the use of a barrier preventing contact with residual
contamination and implementation of a deed restriction limiting
site activities. To our knowledge, our work at our Sheboygan
resort has been conducted in accordance with requirements
imposed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Based
on these efforts, we are not aware of any environmental
liability or compliance concerns at our Sheboygan resort that we
believe would materially adversely affect our financial
conditions or results of operations. It is possible, however,
that our efforts have not identified all environmental
conditions at the property or that environmental conditions and
liabilities associated with the property could change in the
future.
Future acquisitions of properties subject to environmental
requirements or affected by environmental contamination could
require us to incur substantial costs relating to such matters.
In addition, environmental laws, regulations, wetlands,
endangered species and other land use and natural resource
issues affecting either currently owned properties or sites
identified as possible future acquisitions may increase costs
associated with future site development and construction
activities or business or expansion opportunities, prevent,
delay, alter or interfere with such plans or otherwise adversely
affect such plans.
Insurance
We believe that our properties are covered by adequate fire,
flood and property insurance, as well as commercial liability
insurance with what we believe are commercially reasonable
deductibles and limits for our industry. Changes in the
insurance market since September 11, 2001 have generally
caused increases in insurance costs and deductibles, and have
increased the risk that affordable insurance may not be
available to us in the future.
While our management believes that our insurance coverage is
adequate, if we were held liable for amounts and claims
exceeding the limits of our insurance coverage or outside the
scope of our insurance coverage, our business, results of
operations and financial condition could be materially and
adversely affected.
Intellectual
Property
We have registered, applied for the registration of or claim
ownership of a variety of trade names, service marks, copyrights
and trademarks for use in our business, including Biko the Bear,
Blue Harbor Resort, Boathouse Suite, Breaker Bay, Crew Club, Cub
Club, Great Wolf Lodge, Great Wolf Resorts, KidAquarium
19
Suite, KidCabin and Wiley the Wolf in the United States and,
where appropriate, in foreign countries. There can be no
assurance that we can obtain the registration for the marks
where registration has been sought. We are not aware of any
facts that would negatively impact our continuing use of any of
the above trade names, service marks or trademarks. We consider
our intellectual property rights to be important to our business
and actively defend and enforce them.
Employees
As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately 200 corporate
employees, including our central reservations center employees,
and approximately 3,400 resort-level employees, approximately
1,300 of whom were part-time employees. Unlike more seasonal
resorts and attractions, we are open year-round and are able to
attract and retain high quality employees throughout the year.
However, we do have fewer part-time employees during the winter
months. None of our employees is covered by a collective
bargaining agreement. We believe that our relationship with our
employees is good.
Offices
We lease approximately 13,800 square feet of office space
for our corporate headquarters office and approximately
5,600 square feet of office space for our central
reservations call center operations in Madison, Wisconsin. We
also lease approximately 3,800 square feet of office space
in Falls Church, Virginia, and approximately 1,500 square
feet of office space in North Ridgeville, Ohio. We believe these
facilities are adequate for our current needs.
Domestic
and Foreign Operations
We derive a portion of our revenues from licensing fees,
management fees, construction management fees and central
reservations fees paid by the Great Wolf Lodge resort located in
Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada. During 2006, the total revenue
we received from U.S. operations was $146,984 and the total
revenue we received from Canadian operations was $1,664. During
the year ended 2005 and the period from December 21, 2004
through December 31, 2004, the corresponding amounts were
$139,041 and $4,629, respectively for U.S. operations and
$374 and $0, respectively, for Canadian operations. We receive
no revenue from any foreign country other than Canada. We have
no long-lived assets located outside of the United States.
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to our principal executive officer and senior financial
officers. It is available in the investor relations section of
our website, which is located at www.greatwolf.com. In
the event that we make changes to or provide waivers from the
provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that the
SEC requires us to disclose, we intend to disclose these events
in the investor relations section of our website.
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
The risk factors set forth below are applicable to Great Wolf
Resorts. You should carefully consider the following factors in
evaluating our company, our properties and our business. The
occurrence of any of the following risks could materially
adversely affect, among other things, our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We may
not be able to develop new resorts or further develop existing
resorts on a timely or cost efficient basis, which would
adversely affect our growth strategy.
As part of our growth strategy, we intend to develop additional
resorts and to further expand our existing resorts. Development
involves substantial risks, including the following risks:
|
|
|
|
|
development costs may exceed budgeted or contracted amounts;
|
|
|
|
increases in the costs of materials or supplies used in
construction of our resorts;
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
changes in construction materials or methodologies may increase
development costs;
|
|
|
|
delays in architectural or other design-related services, or in
the commencement or completion of construction;
|
|
|
|
failure to obtain all necessary zoning, land use, occupancy,
construction, operating and other required governmental permits
and authorizations;
|
|
|
|
changes in real estate, zoning, land use, environmental and tax
laws;
|
|
|
|
unavailability of financing on favorable terms;
|
|
|
|
failure of developed properties to achieve desired revenue or
profitability levels once opened;
|
|
|
|
scarcity of suitable development sites, due to existing
development, physical limitation or competition for sites from
competitors that may have greater financial resources or risk
tolerance than we do; and
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of substantial costs in the event a development
project must be abandoned prior to completion.
|
In particular, resort construction projects entail significant
risks, including shortages of design and construction expertise,
materials or skilled labor, unforeseen engineering,
environmental or geological problems, work stoppages, weather
interference, floods and unanticipated cost increases. There are
also a limited number of suppliers and manufacturers of the
equipment we use in our indoor waterparks. We may not be able to
successfully manage our development to minimize these risks, and
there can be no assurance that present or future developments
will perform in accordance with our previous developments or our
expectations.
We
compete with other family vacation travel destinations and
resorts.
Our resorts compete with other forms of family vacation travel,
including theme, water and amusement parks and other
recreational activities. Our business is also subject to factors
that affect the recreation and leisure and resort industries
generally, such as general economic conditions and changes in
consumer spending habits. We believe the principal competitive
factors of a family entertainment resort include location, room
rates, name recognition, reputation, the uniqueness and
perceived quality of the attractions and amenities, the
atmosphere and cleanliness of the attractions and amenities, the
quality and perceived value, of the lodging accommodations, the
quality and perceived value of the food and beverage service,
convenience, service levels and reservation systems.
Many of our markets have become more competitive, including in
particular our Sandusky and Traverse City markets. We anticipate
that competition within some of our markets will increase
further in the foreseeable future. A number of other resort
operators are developing family entertainment resorts with
indoor waterparks that will compete with some or all of our
resorts. We compete for guests and for new development sites
with certain of these entities that may have greater financial
resources than we do and better relationships with lenders and
sellers of real estate. These entities may be able to accept
more risk than we can prudently manage and may have greater
marketing and financial resources. Further, there can be no
assurance that new or existing competitors will not
significantly reduce their rates, as they have in the past, or
offer greater convenience, services or amenities, significantly
expand or improve resorts, including the addition of
thrill rides, in markets in which we operate. Such
events could materially adversely affect our business and
results of operations.
We may
not be able to manage our expected growth, which could adversely
affect our operating results.
Since 1999, we have experienced substantial growth as we have
grown from operating one resort to our current portfolio of
resorts. We intend to continue to develop additional resorts and
manage additional licensed resorts owned by joint ventures in
which we have an equity interest and by third parties. Our
anticipated growth could place a strain on our management,
employees and operations. Our growth has increased our operating
complexity and the level of responsibility for new and existing
management. Our ability to compete
21
effectively and to manage our recent and future growth
effectively will depend on our ability to implement and improve
financial and management information systems on a timely basis
and to effect changes in our business, such as implementing
internal controls to handle the increased size of our operations
and hiring, training, developing and managing an increasing
number of experienced management-level and other employees.
Unexpected difficulties during expansion, the loss of or failure
to attract and retain qualified employees or our inability to
respond effectively to recent growth or plan for future
expansion, could adversely affect our results of operations.
Accidents
or injuries in our resorts, particularly in our waterparks, may
subject us to liability, and accidents or injuries at our
resorts or at competing resorts with waterparks could adversely
affect our safety reputation and attendance, which would harm
our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
There are inherent risks of accidents or injuries at family
entertainment resorts, including accidents or injuries at
waterparks, particularly for young children if their parents do
not provide appropriate supervision. The lifeguards in our
indoor waterparks and our other resort staff cannot prevent
every accident or injury. Potential waterpark accidents and
injuries include falls, cuts or other abrasions, concussions and
other head injuries, sickness from contaminated water,
Chlorine-related irritation, injuries resulting from equipment
malfunctions and drownings. One or more accidents or injuries at
any of our waterparks or at other waterparks could reduce
attendance at our resorts, adversely affect our safety
reputation among our potential customers, decrease our overall
occupancy rates and increase our costs by requiring us to take
additional measures to make our safety precautions even more
visible and effective.
If accidents or injuries occur at any of our resorts, we may be
held liable for costs related to the injuries. We maintain
insurance of the type and in the amounts that we believe are
commercially reasonable and that are available to businesses in
our industry, but there can be no assurance that our liability
insurance will be adequate or available at all times and in all
circumstances to cover any liability for these costs. There can
also be no assurance that the liability insurance carried by
Great Lakes prior to the IPO was adequate or available to cover
any liability related to incidents occurring prior to the IPO.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations
would be adversely affected to the extent claims and associated
expenses resulting from accidents or injuries exceed our
insurance recoveries.
We and
our predecessor entities have a history of losses and we may not
be able to achieve or sustain profitability.
We incurred a net loss in the year ended December 31, 2006
and 2005, and the period December 21, 2004 through
December 31, 2004, and our predecessor entities incurred
net losses in the period January 1, 2004 through
December 20, 2004. We cannot guarantee that we will become
profitable. Given the increasing competition in our industry and
capital intensive nature of our business, we may not be able to
sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual
basis, and our failure to do so could adversely affect our
business and financial condition.
Our
business is dependent upon family vacation patterns, which may
cause fluctuations in our revenues.
Since most families with young children choose to take vacations
during school breaks and on weekends, our occupancy is highest
on the weekends and during months with prolonged school breaks,
such as the summer months and spring break weeks in March and
April. Our occupancy is lowest during May and September as
children return to school following these prolonged breaks. As a
result of these family vacation patterns, our revenues may
fluctuate. We may be required to enter into short-term
borrowings in slower periods in order to offset such
fluctuations in revenues and to fund our anticipated
obligations. In addition, adverse events occurring during our
peak occupancy periods would have an increased impact on our
results of operations.
22
We may
not be able to attract a significant number of customers from
our key target markets, which would adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our strategy emphasizes attracting and retaining customers from
the local, or drive-to, markets within a convenient driving
distance from each of our resorts. Any resorts we develop in the
future are similarly likely to be dependent primarily on the
markets in the immediate vicinity of such resorts. Regional
economic difficulties, for example the issues affecting domestic
automotive manufacturers and the related impact in Michigan and
surrounding areas, may have a disproportionate negative impact
on our resorts in the affected markets. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to continue to attract a
sufficient number of customers in our local markets to make our
resort operations profitable. If we fail to do so, our business,
financial condition and results of operations would be adversely
affected.
Because
we concentrate in a single industry segment, we may be adversely
affected by a downturn in that industry segment.
Our assets and operations are concentrated in a single industry
segment family entertainment resorts. Our current
strategy is to expand the number of our resorts and improve our
existing resorts. Therefore, a downturn in the entertainment,
travel or vacation industries, in general, and the family
entertainment resort segment, in particular, could have an
adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Changes
in consumer spending habits may affect our growth, financial
condition and results of operations.
The success of our operations depends to a significant extent
upon a number of factors relating to discretionary consumer
spending, including economic conditions affecting disposable
consumer income such as employment, business conditions,
interest rates and taxation. There can be no assurance that
consumer spending will not be adversely affected by economic
conditions, thereby impacting our growth, financial condition
and results of operations.
Increases
in operating costs and other expense items could reduce our
operating margins and adversely affect our growth, financial
condition and results of operations.
Increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors
may not be directly offset by increased room and other revenue.
Our most significant operating costs are our labor, energy,
insurance and property taxes. Many, and in some cases all, of
the factors affecting these costs are beyond our control.
Labor is our primary resort-level operating expense. As of
December 31, 2006, we employed nearly
3,400 hourly-wage and salaried employees in our resorts. If
we face labor shortages or increased labor costs because of
increased competition for employees, higher employee turnover
rates or increases in the federal minimum wage or other employee
benefits costs (including costs associated with health insurance
coverage), our operating expenses could increase and our growth
could be adversely affected. Our success depends in part upon
our ability to attract, motivate and retain a sufficient number
of qualified employees, including resort managers, lifeguards,
waterpark maintenance professionals and resort staff, necessary
to keep pace with our expansion schedule. The number of
qualified individuals needed to fill these positions is in short
supply in some areas. Any future inability to recruit and retain
sufficient individuals may delay the planned openings of new
resorts. Competition for qualified employees could also require
us to pay higher wages to attract a sufficient number of
employees.
Energy costs also account for a significant portion of our total
resort-level operating expenses. The price of energy is
volatile, and shortages sometimes occur. Significant increases
in the cost of energy, or shortages of energy, could interrupt
or curtail our operations and lower our operating margins.
The costs for maintaining adequate insurance coverage fluctuate
and are generally beyond our control. If insurance rates
increase and we are not able to pass along those increased costs
to our customers through higher room rates and amenity costs,
our operating margins could suffer.
Each of our resorts is subject to real and personal property
taxes. The real and personal property taxes on our resorts may
increase or decrease as tax rates change and as our resorts are
assessed or reassessed by taxing
23
authorities. If property taxes increase and we are unable to
pass these increased costs along to our customers through higher
room rates and amenity costs, our financial condition and
results of operations may be adversely affected.
We may
not be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms,
if at all.
We expect that we will require additional financing over time,
the amount of which will depend on a number of factors,
including the number of resorts we construct, additions to our
current resorts and the cash flow generated by our resorts. The
terms of any additional financing we may be able to procure are
unknown at this time. Our access to third-party sources of
capital depends, in part, on:
|
|
|
|
|
general market conditions;
|
|
|
|
the markets perception of our growth potential;
|
|
|
|
our then-current debt levels;
|
|
|
|
our then-current and expected future earnings;
|
|
|
|
our cash flow; and
|
|
|
|
the market price per share of our common stock.
|
Any future debt financing or issuances of preferred stock that
we may make will be senior to the rights of holders of our
common stock, and any future issuances of common stock will
result in the dilution of the then-existing stockholders
proportionate equity interest.
Uninsured
losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage could
adversely affect our financial condition and our cash flow, and
there are a limited number of insurers that will underwrite
coverage for resorts with indoor waterparks.
We maintain comprehensive liability, fire, flood (where
appropriate) and extended coverage insurance with respect to our
resorts with policy specifications, limits and deductibles that
we believe are commercially reasonable for our operations and
are available to businesses in our industry. Certain types of
losses, however, may be either uninsurable or not economically
insurable, such as losses due to earthquakes, riots, acts of war
or terrorism, or losses related to the award of punitive damages
in a legal action. Should an uninsured loss occur, we could lose
both our investment in, and anticipated profits and cash flow
from, a resort. If any such loss is insured, we may be required
to pay a significant deductible on any claim for recovery of
such a loss prior to our insurer being obligated to reimburse us
for the loss or the amount of the loss may exceed our coverage
for the loss. In addition, we may not be able to obtain
insurance in the future at acceptable rates, or at all, and
insurance may not be available to us on favorable terms or at
all, including insurance for the construction and development of
our resorts, especially since there are a limited number of
insurance companies that underwrite insurance for indoor
waterparks.
We
will be required to make certain capital expenditures to
maintain the quality of our resorts, which could adversely
affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Our resorts have an ongoing need for renovations and other
capital improvements, including periodic replacement of
furniture, fixtures and equipment. The cost of such capital
improvements could have an adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations. Such renovations involve
certain risks, including the possibility of environmental
problems, construction cost overruns and delays, the possibility
that we will not have available cash to fund renovations or that
financing for renovations will not be available on favorable
terms, if at all, uncertainties as to market demand or
deterioration in market demand after commencement of renovation
and the emergence of unanticipated competition from other
entities. If we are unable to meet our capital expenditure
needs, we may not be able to maintain the quality of our resorts.
24
We may
not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property,
which could harm the value of our brands and adversely affect
our business.
The success of our resorts depends in part on our brands, logos
and branded merchandise. We rely on a combination of trademarks,
copyrights, service marks, trade secrets and similar
intellectual property rights to protect our brands, logos,
branded merchandise and other intellectual property. The success
of our growth strategy depends on our continued ability to use
our existing trademarks and service marks in order to increase
brand awareness and further develop our brand in both domestic
and international markets. We also use our trademarks and other
intellectual property on the Internet. If our efforts to protect
our intellectual property are not adequate, or if any third
party misappropriates or infringes on our intellectual property,
either in print or on the Internet, the value of our brands may
be harmed, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, including the failure of our brands, logos and branded
merchandise to achieve and maintain market acceptance.
We have licensed our Great Wolf Lodge brand and intend to
further license the brand in domestic and international markets.
While we try to ensure that the quality of our brand is
maintained by our current licensees, and will be maintained by
any future licensees, we cannot assure you that these licensees
will not take actions that adversely affect the value of our
intellectual property or reputation.
We have registered certain trademarks and have other trademark
registrations pending in the United States and foreign
jurisdictions. There is no guarantee that our trademark
registration applications will be granted. In addition, the
trademarks that we currently use have not been registered in all
of the countries in which we do, or intend to do, business and
may never be registered in all of these countries. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to adequately protect our
trademarks or that our use of these trademarks will not result
in liability for trademark infringement, trademark dilution or
unfair competition.
We may not have taken all the steps necessary to protect our
intellectual property in the United States and foreign
countries. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do
not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as
the laws of the United States.
Our
operations may be adversely affected by extreme weather
conditions and the impact of disasters.
We currently operate, and in the future intend to operate, our
resorts in a number of different markets, each of which is
subject to local weather patterns and their effects on our
resorts, especially our guests ability to travel to our
resorts. Extreme weather conditions can from time to time have
an adverse impact upon individual resorts or particular regions.
Our resorts are also vulnerable to the effects of destructive
forces, such as fire, storms, high winds and flooding and any
other occurrence that could affect the supply of water, gas,
telephone or electricity to our resorts. Although our resorts
are insured against property damage, damages resulting from acts
of God or otherwise may exceed the limits of our insurance
coverage or be outside the scope of that coverage.
Compliance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other governmental
regulations and changes in governmental rules and regulations
may adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or the ADA,
all public accommodations are required to meet certain federal
requirements related to access and use by disabled persons.
While we believe that our resorts are substantially in
compliance with these requirements, we have not conducted an
audit or investigation of all of our resorts to determine our
compliance. A determination that we are not in compliance with
the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of
damages to private litigants. We cannot predict the ultimate
cost of compliance with the ADA.
The resort industry is also subject to numerous federal, state
and local governmental regulations including those related to
building and zoning requirements, and we are subject to laws
governing our relationship with our employees, including minimum
wage requirements, overtime, working conditions and work permit
requirements. In addition, changes in governmental rules and
regulations or enforcement policies affecting the
25
use and operation of our resorts, including changes to building
codes and fire and life safety codes, may occur. If we were
required to make substantial modifications at our resorts to
comply with the ADA, other governmental regulations or changes
in governmental rules and regulations, our financial condition
and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We
face possible liability for environmental cleanup costs and
damages for contamination related to our properties, which could
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Our operations and properties are subject to federal, state and
local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the
environment, natural resources and worker health and safety,
including laws and regulations governing and creating liability
relating to the management, storage and disposal of hazardous
substances and other regulated materials. Our properties are
also subject to various environmental laws and regulations that
govern certain aspects of our ongoing operations. These laws and
regulations control such things as the nature and volume of our
wastewater discharges, quality of our water supply and our waste
management practices. The costs of complying with these
requirements, and of paying penalties, fines, assessments and
the like related to non-compliance, as they now exist or may be
altered in the future, could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations. Specifically, the
wastewater treatment plant at our Poconos Mountains resort is
subject to numerous state, federal and other regulations. The
cost of compliance with such regulations for penalties,
remediation and other costs arising out of non compliance, as
occurred in 2006 when we agreed to pay a penalty of $833 and
incurred other costs in excess of $1,000 to remediate wastewater
discharges that were out of compliance with applicable permits
and to prevent further
out-of-compliance
discharges.
Because we own and operate real property, various federal, state
and local laws may impose liability on us for the costs of
removing or remediating various hazardous substances, including
substances that may be currently unknown to us, that may have
been released on or in our property or disposed by us at
third-party locations. The principal federal laws relating to
environmental contamination and associated liabilities that
could affect us are the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act; state and local governments have also adopted
separate but similar environmental laws and regulations that
vary from state to state and locality to locality. These laws
may impose liability jointly and severally, without regard to
fault and whether or not we knew of or caused the release. The
presence of hazardous substances on a property or the failure to
meet environmental regulatory requirements may materially
adversely affect our ability to use or sell the property, or to
use the property as collateral for borrowing, and may cause us
to incur substantial remediation or compliance costs. In
addition, if hazardous substances are located on or released
from one of our properties, we could incur substantial
liabilities through a private party personal injury claim, a
claim by an adjacent property owner for property damage or a
claim by a governmental entity for other damages, such as
natural resource damages. This liability may be imposed on us
under environmental laws or common-law principles.
We obtain environmental assessment reports on the properties we
own or operate as we deem appropriate. These reports have not
revealed any environmental liability or compliance concerns that
we believe would materially adversely affect our financial
condition or results of operations. However, the environmental
assessments that we have undertaken might not have revealed all
potential environmental liabilities or claims for such
liabilities. It is also possible that future laws, ordinances or
regulations or changed interpretations of existing laws and
regulations will impose material environmental liability or
compliance costs on us, that the current environmental
conditions of properties we own or operate will be affected by
other properties in the vicinity or by the actions of third
parties unrelated to us or that our guests could introduce
hazardous or toxic substances into the resorts we own or manage
without our knowledge and expose us to liability under federal
or state environmental laws. The costs of defending these
claims, complying with as yet unidentified requirements,
conducting this environmental remediation or responding to such
changed conditions could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
Some of our resort properties may have contained, or are
adjacent to or near other properties that have contained or
currently contain underground storage tanks for the storage of
petroleum products or other
26
hazardous or toxic substances. If hazardous or toxic substances
were released from these tanks, we could incur significant costs
or, with respect to tanks on our property, be liable to third
parties with respect to the releases.
On occasion, we may elect to develop properties that have had a
history of industrial activities
and/or
historical environmental contamination. Where such opportunities
arise, we engage third-party experts to evaluate the extent of
contamination, the scope of any needed environmental
clean-up
work, and available measures (such as creation of barriers over
residual contamination and deed restrictions prohibiting
groundwater use or disturbance of the soil) for ensuring that
planned development and future property uses will not present
unacceptable human health or environmental risks or exposure to
liabilities. If those environmental assessments indicate that
the development opportunities are acceptable, we also work with
appropriate governmental agencies and obtain their approvals of
planned site
clean-up,
development activities and the proposed future property uses. We
have followed that process in connection with the development of
our Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin where the City of
Sheboygan has arranged for environmental
clean-up
work and ongoing groundwater monitoring and we have agreed to
the use of a barrier preventing contact with residual
contamination and implementation of a deed restriction limiting
site activities. To our knowledge, our work at our Sheboygan
resort has been conducted in accordance with requirements
imposed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Based
on these efforts, we are not aware of any environmental
liability or compliance concerns at our Sheboygan resort that we
believe would materially adversely affect our financial
conditions or results of operations. It is possible, however,
that our efforts have not identified all environmental
conditions at the property or that environmental conditions and
liabilities associated with the property could change in the
future.
Future acquisitions of properties subject to environmental
requirements or affected by environmental contamination could
require us to incur substantial costs relating to such matters.
In addition, environmental laws, regulations, wetlands,
endangered species and other land use and natural resource
issues affecting either currently owned properties or sites
identified as possible future acquisitions may increase costs
associated with future site development and construction
activities or business or expansion opportunities, prevent,
delay, alter or interfere with such plans or otherwise adversely
affect such plans.
Regulation
of the marketing and sale of condominiums, including a prior
offer of condominiums at our Blue Harbor Resort, could adversely
affect our business.
Our marketing and sales of condominium units are subject to
extensive regulation by the federal government and the states in
which our condominiums are marketed and sold. On a federal
level, the Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits unfair or
deceptive acts or competition in interstate commerce. Other
federal legislation to which we are or may be subject includes
the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, the Real Estate
Settlement Practices Act and the Fair Housing Act. In addition,
many states have adopted specific laws and regulations regarding
the sale of condominiums. For example, certain state laws grant
the purchaser the right to cancel a contract of purchase within
a specified period following the earlier of the date the
contract was signed or the date the purchaser has received the
last of the documents required to be provided by the seller. No
assurance can be given that the cost of qualifying under
condominium regulations in all jurisdictions in which we desire
to conduct sales will not be significant. The failure to comply
with such laws or regulations could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
There can be no assurance that prior or future sales of our
condominium units will not be considered offers or sales of
securities under federal law or the state law in the
states where we desire to, or do, conduct sales or in which our
properties are located. If such interests were considered to be
securities, we would be required to comply with applicable state
and federal securities laws, including laws pertaining to
registration or qualification of securities, licensing of
salespeople and other matters. There can be no assurance that we
will be able to comply with the applicable state and federal
securities requirements, and if the offers or sales of our
condominium units are deemed to be offers or sales of
securities, such a determination may create liabilities or
contingencies that could have an adverse effect on our
operations, including possible rescission rights relating to the
units that have been sold, which, if exercised, could result in
losses and would adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
27
In particular, it is possible that the prior offer of
condominiums at our Sheboygan resort by Blue Harbor Resort
Condominium, LLC, a former subsidiary of Great Lakes that we
refer to as Condo LLC, may not have been in compliance with
federal and state securities laws. Prior to the initial public
offering and the completion of the formation transactions,
interests in Condo LLC held by Great Lakes were distributed to
Great Lakes shareholders. We did not acquire Condo LLC as
a part of the formation transactions. Although Condo LLC has
taken steps to correct any potential securities laws issues in
connection with these offers, we cannot assure you that we would
not be held liable to some extent for the offers made by Condo
LLC.
The
illiquidity of real estate may make it difficult for us to
dispose of one or more of our resorts.
We may from time to time decide to dispose of one or more of our
real estate assets. Because real estate holdings generally, and
family entertainment resorts like ours in particular, are
relatively illiquid, we may not be able to dispose of one or
more real estate assets on a timely basis or at a favorable
price. The illiquidity of our real estate assets could mean that
we continue to operate a facility that management has identified
for disposition. Failure to dispose of a real estate asset in a
timely fashion, or at all, could adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
The
covenants in our mortgage loan agreements impose significant
restrictions on us.
The terms of our mortgage loan agreements impose significant
operating and financial restrictions on us and our subsidiaries
and require us to meet certain financial tests. These
restrictions could also have a negative impact on our business,
financial condition and results of operations by significantly
limiting or prohibiting us from engaging in certain
transactions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
incurring or guaranteeing additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
transferring or selling assets currently held by us;
|
|
|
|
transferring ownership interests in certain of our
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
reducing our tangible net worth below specified levels.
|
The failure to comply with any of these covenants could cause a
default under our other debt agreements. Any of these defaults,
if not waived, could result in the acceleration of all of our
debt, in which case the debt would become immediately due and
payable. If this occurs, we may not be able to repay our debt or
borrow sufficient funds to refinance it.
Certain
of our insiders exercise considerable influence over the
company.
As of the date of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
our executive officers and directors, as a group, beneficially
own approximately 5.4% of the outstanding shares of our common
stock. By reason of such holdings, these stockholders acting as
a group will be able to exercise significant influence over our
affairs and policies, including the election of our board of
directors and matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders
such as mergers and significant asset sales, and their interests
might not be consistent with the interests of other stockholders.
We may
have assumed unknown liabilities in connection with the
formation transactions.
As part of the formation transactions, we acquired our
predecessor companies subject to existing liabilities, some of
which may have been unknown at the time of the closing thereof.
Unknown liabilities might include liabilities for cleanup or
remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions, claims of
vendors or other persons dealing with the entities prior to the
closing of the formation transactions (that had not been
asserted or threatened prior thereto), tax liabilities and
accrued but unpaid liabilities incurred in the ordinary course
of business. The founding shareholders of our predecessor
companies agreed to indemnify us with respect to claims for
breaches of representations and warranties brought by us within
one year following the completion of the IPO and the formation
transactions, subject to certain limitations. Many liabilities
may not
28
have been identified by December 20, 2005, the expiration
of the one-year period, and we may have no recourse against the
founding shareholders or these entities for such liabilities.
We may
issue partnership interests in the future that may be dilutive
to, and may have preferential rights over, our common
stockholders.
We have formed a wholly owned operating partnership to serve as
the parent entity of each of the resort-owning entities that we
acquired in the formation transactions. We are the limited
partner of the partnership and the sole general partner of the
partnership is a wholly owned subsidiary that we have formed for
that purpose. We formed the operating partnership to provide
flexibility for future transactions as we execute our growth
strategy. We believe that the ability to issue partnership units
will enable us to acquire assets from sellers seeking certain
tax treatment. While we do not anticipate issuing any interests
in the operating partnership in the foreseeable future, we may
issue such interests in the future. These additional interests
may include preferred limited partnership units. Any partnership
interests that we issue may be entitled to distributions of
available cash that might otherwise be allocated to the
execution of our business plan or generally available for future
dividends, if any. In addition, any partnership interests may be
convertible into our common stock, thus having a dilutive impact
to our common stockholders, and may have voting or other
preferential rights relative to those of our common stockholders.
Our
stock price has been volatile in the past and may be volatile in
the future.
On December 20, 2004, we completed the initial public
offering. Trading markets after an initial public offering have
often been extremely volatile. Since our initial public offering
through March 2, 2007, our common stock has traded at a
high of $25.88 and a low of $8.00. The following factors could
cause the price of our common stock in the public market to
fluctuate significantly:
|
|
|
|
|
variations in our quarterly operating results;
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of companies in the resort or
entertainment industries, generally, and the family
entertainment resort segment, specifically;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes;
|
|
|
|
issuances of common stock or other securities in the future;
|
|
|
|
the addition or departure of key personnel; and
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of new properties,
acquisitions or joint ventures, or our failure to announce new
properties of a type or in a quantity deemed desirable by
participants in the public market.
|
Volatility in the market price of our common stock may prevent
investors from being able to sell their common stock at or above
the price an investor pays for our common stock. In the past,
class action litigation has often been brought against companies
following periods of volatility in the market price of those
companies common stock. Litigation is often expensive and
diverts managements attention and company resources and
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and operating results.
The
sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may
cause the market price of our common stock to
decline.
If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of shares of common
stock in the public market, including the shares issued in
connection with our formation transactions, or upon the exercise
of outstanding options, or if the market perceives that these
sales could occur, the market price of our common stock could
decline. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to
sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time
and price that we deem appropriate, or to use equity as
consideration for future acquisitions.
29
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, employment
agreements and Delaware law have anti-takeover effects that
could prevent a change in control that could be beneficial to
our stockholders, which could depress the market price of our
common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, employment agreements
and Delaware corporate law contain provisions that could delay,
defer, increase the costs of or prevent a change in control of
us or our management that could be beneficial to our
stockholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy
contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect
directors and take other corporate actions. As a result, these
provisions could limit the price that investors are willing to
pay in the future for shares of our common stock. These
provisions might also discourage a potential acquisition
proposal or tender offer, even if the acquisition proposal or
tender offer is at a price above the then current market price
for our common stock. These provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
authorize our board of directors to issue blank
check preferred stock and determine the powers,
preferences and privileges of those shares without prior
stockholder approval;
|
|
|
|
prohibit the right of our stockholders to act by written consent;
|
|
|
|
limit the calling of special meetings of stockholders;
|
|
|
|
impose a requirement that holders of 50% of the outstanding
shares of common stock are required to amend the provisions
relating to actions by written consent of stockholders and the
limitations of calling special meetings; and
|
|
|
|
provide for payments to certain of our executive officers upon
termination of employment within certain time periods before or
after a change of control.
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
Certain information included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains, and other materials filed or to be filed by us with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, contain or
will contain, forward-looking statements. All statements, other
than statements of historical facts, including, among others,
statements regarding our future financial results or position,
business strategy, projected levels of growth, projected costs
and projected financing needs, are forward-looking statements.
Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief
or current expectations of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and members
of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which such
statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of
words such as may, will,
seeks, anticipates,
believes, estimates,
expects, plans, intends,
should or similar expressions. Forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve
risks and uncertainties that actual results may differ
materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking
statements. Important factors currently known to our management
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
in forward-looking statements include those set forth above
under the section entitled Risk Factors.
We believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable;
however, undue reliance should not be placed on any
forward-looking statements, which are based on current
expectations. All written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are qualified
in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Further,
forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are
made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise
forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the
occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future
operating results over time unless required by law.
Available
Information
We maintain an Internet site at http://www.greatwolf.com.
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act), as well as our Annual Report to
shareowners and Section 16 reports on Forms 3, 4,
and 5, are available free of charge via EDGAR through the
SECs website http://www.sec.gov. We have provided a
link on our Internet site to the SECs website.
30
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
We have eight family entertainment resorts that are currently
operating and two additional resorts that are under development.
Unless otherwise indicated, we own a 100% fee interest in these
properties. Information on our properties is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Wisconsin Dells is located on 16 acres
in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, all of which have been developed.
This property is owned by a joint venture of which Great Wolf
Resorts has a 30% minority interest and CNL Income Properties,
Inc. has a 70% majority interest.
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Sandusky is located on 15 acres in
Sandusky, Ohio, all of which have been developed. This property
is owned by a joint venture of which Great Wolf Resorts has a
30% minority interest and CNL Income Properties, Inc. has a 70%
majority interest.
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City is located on 48 acres in
Traverse City, Michigan, of which 22 acres have been
developed and 26 acres remain undeveloped.
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City is located on 17 acres in
Kansas City, Kansas, all of which have been developed.
|
|
|
|
Blue Harbor Resort of Sheboygan is located on 12 leased
acres in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, all of which have been developed.
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg is located on 83 acres in
Williamsburg, Virginia, of which 36 acres have been
developed or are under development and 47 acres remain
undeveloped.
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of the Pocono Mountains is located on 95 acres
in Pocono Township, near Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, of which
45 acres are developed and 50 acres remain undeveloped.
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Mason is located on 39 acres in Mason,
Ohio. We have an 84% ownership in the joint venture that owns
this resort. All 39 acres of this property are developed.
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Grapevine which is currently under
construction, will be located on 51 acres in Grapevine,
Texas, of which 30 acres are being developed and
21 acres will remain undeveloped.
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Grand Mound, which is under construction,
will be located on 39 leased acres in Grand Mound,
Washington. This property is owned by a joint venture of which
Great Wolf Resorts has a 49% minority interest and The
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation has a 51%
majority interest.
|
For additional information regarding our resort properties see
Item 1. Business Operating
Properties and Item 1. Business
Properties Under Construction above.
We lease approximately 13,800 square feet of office space
for our corporate headquarters office and approximately
5,600 square feet of office space for our central
reservations call center operations in Madison, Wisconsin. We
also lease approximately 3,800 square feet of office space
in Falls Church, Virginia, and approximately 1,500 square
feet of office space in North Ridgeville, Ohio. We believe these
facilities are adequate for our current needs.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
On February 1, 2007 we entered into a consent settlement
with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection,
settling proposed civil penalties arising out of alleged
violations by our Pocono Mountains resort of certain provisions
of its wastewater discharge permit between October 2005 and
August 2006. The agreed upon penalty amount was $833. We expect
to incur some additional costs to further improve
31
the wastewater treatment plant and to avoid future permit
violations, which we expect will cost in excess of $200.
In addition, we are involved in other litigation from time to
time in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe
that the outcome of any such pending or threatened litigation
will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
or results of operations. However, as is inherent in legal
proceedings where issues may be decided by finders of fact,
there is a risk that unpredictable decisions adverse to the
company could be reached.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
We did not submit any matters to a vote of security holder
during the fourth quarter of 2006.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
In conjunction with the completion of our IPO, our common shares
began trading on NASDAQ National Market under the symbol
WOLF. The following table sets forth the high and
low closing prices for our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.88
|
|
|
$
|
20.07
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.25
|
|
|
$
|
17.80
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.82
|
|
|
$
|
9.20
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
10.82
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
11.68
|
|
|
$
|
9.80
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
12.72
|
|
|
$
|
10.70
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
12.71
|
|
|
$
|
10.16
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
14.22
|
|
|
$
|
11.54
|
|
Fiscal 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter through
March 2, 2007
|
|
$
|
14.73
|
|
|
$
|
12.91
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, there were 215 record holders of
our common stock. As of March 2, 2007, there were 217 record
holders of our common stock. The closing price of our common
stock on the NASDAQ National Market on March 2, 2007, was
$13.37.
In connection with our formation transactions, we issued common
stock to certain holders of securities, who, among other things,
have certified to us as to their status as accredited
investors, in each of GLC and its resort related
subsidiaries. In total, we issued an aggregate of
13,901,947 shares of our common stock to such investors. In
exchange, we received all or a portion of each such
investors interest in either GLC or the applicable resort
related GLC subsidiary and such entities became wholly owned
subsidiaries of our company. Also in connection with our
formation transactions, we issued (1) 64,038 shares of
our common stock to the holder of a tenant in common interest in
our Poconos resort and (2) 67,516 shares of our common
stock to the holder of a tenant in common interest in our
Williamsburg resort. In addition, we issued 100 shares of
common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to GLC upon our
formation on May 10, 2004. We received an aggregate of
$1,000 in cash in exchange for these shares. We redeemed these
shares in connection with the formation transactions.
32
In March 2005 we completed a private offering of $50,000 of
trust preferred securities (TPS) through Great Wolf Capital
Trust I (the Trust), a Delaware statutory trust which is
our subsidiary. The securities pay holders cumulative cash
distributions at an annual rate which is fixed at 7.80% through
March 2015 and then floats at LIBOR + 310 basis points
thereafter. The securities mature in March 2035 and are callable
at no premium after March 2010. In addition, we invested $1,500
in the Trusts common securities, representing 3% of the
total capitalization of the Trust. The Trust used the proceeds
of the offering and our investment to purchase from us $51,550
of our junior subordinated debentures with payment terms that
mirror the distribution terms of the trust securities. The costs
of the trust preferred offering totaled $1,600, including $1,500
of underwriting commissions and expenses and $100 of costs
incurred directly by the Trust. The Trust paid these costs
utilizing an investment from us. These costs are being amortized
over a
30-year
period. The proceeds from our debenture sale, net of the costs
of the trust preferred offering and our investment in the Trust,
were $48,400.
The issuances described above were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder as
transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.
Dividend
Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock, and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the
foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain our earnings,
if any, for future growth. Future dividends on our common stock,
if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and
will depend on, among other things, our operations, capital
requirements and surplus, general financial condition,
contractual restrictions and such other factors as our board of
directors may deem relevant.
Performance
Graph
The following graph depicts the Companys total monthly
return to shareholders from January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2006, relative to the performance of
(i) the Standard & Poors 500 Index,
(ii) the NASDAQ 100 Index, and (iii) the Russell 2000
Index. All indices shown in the graph assume an investment of
$100 on January 1, 2006 and the reinvestment of dividends
paid since that date. The Company has never paid cash dividends
on its common stock. The stock price performance shown in the
graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.
33
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial
and operating data on a historical basis for Great Wolf Resorts,
and on a combined historical basis for Great Lakes Predecessor
(the Predecessor). The Predecessor was the predecessor
accounting entity to Great Wolf Resorts. We have not presented
historical information for Great Wolf Resorts prior to
December 20, 2004, the date on which we closed the IPO,
because we did not have any material corporate operating
activity during the period from our formation until the closing
of the IPO.
Great
Wolf Resorts Financial Information
Great Wolf Resorts consolidated financial information
includes:
|
|
|
|
|
our corporate entity that provides resort development and
management services;
|
|
|
|
our Traverse City, Kansas City, Sheboygan, Williamsburg, Pocono
Mountains and Mason operating resorts;
|
|
|
|
for all periods prior to October 2005, the Wisconsin Dells and
Sandusky resorts;
|
|
|
|
equity interests in resorts in which we have ownership interests
but which we do not consolidate; and
|
|
|
|
our resorts that are under construction which we will
consolidate.
|
Great
Lakes Predecessor Financial Information
The Predecessors combined historical financial information
included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Great Lakes Companies, Inc. (GLC) and its consolidated
subsidiaries, including development of, ownership interests in,
and management contracts with respect to, resorts and certain
non-resort hotels and multifamily housing development and
management assets;
|
|
|
|
the entities that owned our Traverse City, Kansas City and
Sheboygan operating resorts; and
|
|
|
|
the entities that owned our Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains
resorts that were under construction.
|
The Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan resorts opened in
March 2003, May 2003 and June 2004, respectively. Therefore, the
Predecessors historical results of operations only
reflected operating results for Traverse City, Kansas City and
Sheboygan for those periods after the resort opening dates.
The Predecessors financial information did not include the
entities that own the Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky operating
resorts as those entities, while managed by GLC, were controlled
by affiliates of AIG SunAmerica.
34
The following data should be read in conjunction with our
financial statements and notes thereto and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2004-
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004-
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
December 20,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf
|
|
|
Great Wolf
|
|
|
Great Wolf
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
Resorts, Inc.
|
|
|
Resorts, Inc.
|
|
|
Resorts, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Statement of
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
$
|
87,775
|
|
|
$
|
73,207
|
|
|
$
|
3,261
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,438
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Food, beverage and other
|
|
|
43,137
|
|
|
|
36,846
|
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
|
16,110
|
|
|
|
9,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of condominiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management and other fees
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
3,410
|
|
Management and other fees-related
parties
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenue from managed
properties(1)
|
|
|
11,920
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,553
|
|
|
|
14,904
|
|
|
|
14,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
148,648
|
|
|
|
139,415
|
|
|
|
4,629
|
|
|
|
|
65,258
|
|
|
|
46,253
|
|
|
|
18,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses by department:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
11,914
|
|
|
|
10,944
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food, beverage and other
|
|
|
35,923
|
|
|
|
31,407
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
13,678
|
|
|
|
8,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
41,421
|
|
|
|
26,894
|
|
|
|
7,372
|
|
|
|
|
18,613
|
|
|
|
11,376
|
|
|
|
4,159
|
|
Property operating costs
|
|
|
23,217
|
|
|
|
24,798
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
8,810
|
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
25,903
|
|
|
|
26,248
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
12,925
|
|
|
|
7,744
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
Costs of sales of condominiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
50,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of property
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
26,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses from managed
properties(1)
|
|
|
11,920
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,553
|
|
|
|
14,904
|
|
|
|
14,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
202,339
|
|
|
|
165,756
|
|
|
|
10,820
|
|
|
|
|
73,496
|
|
|
|
51,152
|
|
|
|
19,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
(53,691
|
)
|
|
|
(26,341
|
)
|
|
|
(6,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8,238
|
)
|
|
|
(4,899
|
)
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3,105
|
)
|
|
|
(1,623
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,169
|
|
|
|
6,728
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
6,748
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of investments
and securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Interest on mandatorily redeemable
shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
(3,136
|
)
|
|
|
4,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes, minority
interest, and equity in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(57,755
|
)
|
|
|
(31,446
|
)
|
|
|
(6,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14,870
|
)
|
|
|
(6,121
|
)
|
|
|
(6,213
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(8,764
|
)
|
|
|
(7,199
|
)
|
|
|
(2,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in unconsolidated
affiliates, net of tax
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14,870
|
)
|
|
|
(6,121
|
)
|
|
|
(6,213
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
(12,942
|
)
|
|
|
(5,003
|
)
|
|
|
(6,755
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(12,942
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,543
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(1.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(1.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding Basic
|
|
|
30,299,647
|
(2)
|
|
|
30,134,146
|
(2)
|
|
|
30,132,896
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
30,299,647
|
(2)
|
|
|
30,134,146
|
(2)
|
|
|
30,132,896
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2004-
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004-
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
December 20,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf
|
|
|
Great Wolf
|
|
|
Great Wolf
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
Resorts, Inc.
|
|
|
Resorts, Inc.
|
|
|
Resorts, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Cash Flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
29,723
|
|
|
$
|
17,788
|
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,637
|
|
|
$
|
8,126
|
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(107,123
|
)
|
|
|
(65,496
|
)
|
|
|
(97,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
(64,472
|
)
|
|
|
(64,280
|
)
|
|
|
(46,276
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
119,396
|
|
|
|
23,081
|
|
|
|
172,151
|
|
|
|
|
61,424
|
|
|
|
54,854
|
|
|
|
49,797
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (end of
period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
683,439
|
|
|
$
|
605,526
|
|
|
$
|
622,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
173,494
|
|
|
$
|
106,751
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
289,389
|
|
|
|
168,328
|
|
|
|
142,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,733
|
|
|
|
37,710
|
|
Long-term debt secured by assets of
spun-off entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,108
|
|
|
|
5,054
|
|
Long-term debt secured by assets
held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,220
|
|
|
|
31,564
|
|
Non-GAAP financial
Measures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(28,221
|
)(3)
|
|
$
|
(369
|
)(3)
|
|
$
|
(4,294
|
)(3)
|
|
|
$
|
6,507
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
7,559
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects reimbursement of payroll, benefits and costs related to
the operations of properties managed by us in
2005-2006
and the Predecessor in
2001-2004. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in the total shares outstanding of our common stock are
129,412 shares held in a trust that holds the assets to pay
obligations under our deferred compensation plan. Under
applicable accounting rules, the shares of common stock held in
that trust are treated as treasury stock for purposes of our
earnings per share computations and are therefore excluded from
the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. |
|
(3) |
|
See reconciliation to net loss in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with
the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere
in this report. Where appropriate, the following discussion
includes analysis of the effects of our IPO, the Formation
Transactions and related refinancing transactions and certain
other transactions. We make statements in this section that are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal
securities laws. For a complete discussion of forward-looking
statements, see the section in Item 1A of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
report entitled Forward-Looking Statements. Certain
risk factors may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to differ materially from those expressed or
implied by the following discussion. For a discussion of such
risk factors, see the sections in Item 1A of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
report entitled Risk Factors and
Forward-Looking Statements. All dollar amounts in
this discussion, except for per share data and operating
statistics, are in thousands.
Overview
The terms Great Wolf Resorts, us,
we and our are used in this report to
refer to Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries.
Formation. We were formed to succeed to
certain businesses of the Great Lakes Predecessor (the
Predecessor), which was not a legal entity but rather a
combination of numerous entities, all of which were under common
management. These entities were involved in the development,
ownership and operation of resorts, hotels and multifamily
housing projects.
We were incorporated in May 2004 as a Delaware corporation in
anticipation of the initial public offering of our common stock
(the IPO). The IPO closed on December 20, 2004,
concurrently with the completion of various formation
transactions (the Formation Transactions). Pursuant to the
Formation Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
The Predecessor contributed its hotel management and multifamily
housing management and development assets, which were unrelated
to the resort business, to two subsidiaries of the Predecessor
and
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
then distributed the interests in those subsidiaries to the
former shareholders of The Great Lakes Companies, Inc. (GLC)
(one of the Predecessors entities).
|
|
|
|
|
|
We acquired GLC and seven resort-owning entities. Pursuant to
these acquisitions, investors of GLC and the resort-owning
entities received cash, unregistered shares of our common stock
or a combination of cash and unregistered shares of our common
stock. We issued 13,901,947 shares of our common stock and
paid approximately $97,600 in cash in connection with these
acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
We issued an aggregate of 130,949 shares of unregistered
common stock to holders of tenant in common interests in two of
our resorts.
|
These transactions consolidated the ownership of our resort
properties and property interests to Great Wolf Resorts. During
the period from our formation until we commenced operations upon
closing of the IPO on December 20, 2004, we did not have
any material corporate activity.
The IPO consisted of the sale of 16,100,000 shares of
common stock at a price per share of $17.00, generating gross
proceeds of $273,700. The net proceeds to us were approximately
$248,700 after deducting an aggregate of $19,200 in underwriting
discounts and commissions paid to the underwriters and $5,800 in
other expenses directly related to the issuance of common stock
(such as professional fees and printing fees) incurred in
connection with the IPO.
Business. We are a family entertainment resort
company that provides our guests with a high-quality vacation at
an affordable price. We are the largest owner, operator and
developer in North America of drive-to family resorts featuring
indoor waterparks and other family-oriented entertainment
activities. Our resorts generally feature approximately 270 to
400 family suites that sleep from six to ten people and each
includes a wet bar, microwave oven, refrigerator and dining and
sitting area. We provide a full-service entertainment resort
experience to our target customer base: families with children
ranging in ages from 2 to 14 years old that live within a
convenient driving distance of our resorts. We operate under our
Great Wolf Lodge and Blue Harbor Resort brand names. Our resorts
are open year-round and provide a consistent and comfortable
environment where our guests can enjoy our various amenities and
activities.
We provide our guests with a self-contained vacation experience
and focus on capturing a significant portion of their total
vacation spending. We earn revenues through the sale of rooms,
which includes admission to our indoor waterpark, and other
revenue-generating resort amenities. Each of our resorts
features a combination of the following revenue-generating
amenities: themed restaurants, an ice cream shop and
confectionery, full-service spa, game arcade, gift shop and
meeting space. We also generate revenues from licensing
arrangements, management fees and other fees with respect to
properties owned in whole or in part by third parties.
37
The following table presents an overview of our portfolio of
operating resorts and resorts under construction. As of
December 31, 2006, we operate eight Great Wolf Lodge
resorts (our signature northwoods-themed resorts), and one Blue
Harbor Resort (a nautical-themed property).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indoor
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entertainment
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Opening
|
|
Guest Suites
|
|
|
Condo Units
|
|
|
Area(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Approx.
ft2)
|
|
|
Existing Resorts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Dells, WI(2)
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
1997
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
Sandusky, OH(2)
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
2001
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
Traverse City, MI
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2003
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
Kansas City, KS
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2003
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,000
|
|
Sheboygan, WI
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2004
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
Williamsburg, VA
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2005
|
|
|
301
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
Pocono Mountains, PA
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2005
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,000
|
|
Niagara Falls, ONT(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2006
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,000
|
|
Mason, OH(5)
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,000
|
|
Resorts Under
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grapevine, TX(6)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Late 2007
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,000
|
|
Grand Mound, WA(7)
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
Early 2008
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our indoor entertainment areas generally include our indoor
waterpark, game arcade, childrens activity room and
fitness room, as well as our Aveda spa in the resorts that have
such amenities. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2005, we formed a joint venture with CNL Income Properties,
Inc. (CNL), a real estate investment trust focused on leisure
and lifestyle properties. The joint venture acquired our
Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts. CNL owns a 70% interest in
the joint venture, and we retained a 30% interest. CNL paid us
approximately $80 million for its 70% ownership interest.
We continue to operate the properties and license the Great Wolf
Lodge brand to the joint venture under
25-year
agreements, subject to earlier termination in certain situations. |
|
(3) |
|
Construction for the expansion of 104 additional guest suites,
conference center space and waterpark attractions began in May
2006. The additional waterpark attractions were completed in
December 2006. We expect to complete the additional guest suites
and conference center space in Spring 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
An affiliate of Ripley Entertainment, Inc. (Ripley), our
licensee, owns this resort. We have granted Ripley a license to
use the Great Wolf Lodge name for this resort through April
2016. We manage the resort on behalf of Ripley and also provide
central reservation services. |
|
(5) |
|
We have entered into a joint venture agreement with a subsidiary
of CBS Corporation (CBS), to build this resort and attached
conference center. We operate the resort under our Great Wolf
Lodge brand and have a majority of the equity in the project.
CBS has a minority equity interest in the development. This
resort opened in December 2006. The conference center is
expected to be completed in March 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
We are developing a Great Wolf Lodge resort in Grapevine, Texas.
The northwoods themed, eight-story resort will provide a
comprehensive package of first-class destination lodging
amenities and activities. Construction on the resort began in
June 2006 with expected completion in late 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
We have entered into a joint venture agreement with The
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation to build this
resort. We will operate the resort under our Great Wolf Lodge
brand. The Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation will
lease the land needed for the resort to the joint venture, and
they will have a majority equity interest in the joint venture.
Construction on the resort began in October 2006 with expected
completion in early 2008. |
Industry Trends. We operate in the family
entertainment resort segment of the travel and leisure industry.
The concept of a family entertainment resort with an indoor
waterpark was first introduced to the
38
United States in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, and has evolved
there over the past 17 years. In an effort to boost
occupancy and daily rates, as well as capture off-season demand,
hotel operators in the Wisconsin Dells market began expanding
indoor pools and adding waterslides and other water-based
attractions to existing hotels and resorts. The success of these
efforts prompted several local operators to build new, larger
destination resorts based primarily on the concept.
We believe that these properties, which typically are themed and
include other resort features such as arcades, retail shops and
full food and beverage service in addition to the indoor
waterpark, have historically outperformed standard hotels in the
market. We believe that the rate premiums and increased market
share in the Wisconsin Dells for hotels and resorts with some
form of an indoor waterpark can be attributed to several
factors, including the ability to provide a year-round vacation
destination without weather-related risks, the wide appeal of
water-based recreation and the favorable trends in leisure
travel discussed below.
While no standard industry definition for a family entertainment
resort featuring an indoor waterpark has developed, we generally
consider resorts with at least 200 rooms featuring indoor
waterparks larger than 25,000 square feet, as well as a
variety of water slides and other water-based attractions, to be
competitive with our resorts. A recent Hotel & Leisure
Advisors, LLC (H&LA) survey indicates that the number of
indoor waterpark destination resorts has grown from 29 available
properties as of year-end 2005 to 41 available properties as of
year-end 2006.
We believe recent vacation trends favor drive-to family
entertainment resorts featuring indoor waterparks, as the number
of families choosing to take shorter, more frequent vacations
that they can drive to have increased in recent years. We
believe that these trends will continue. We believe indoor
waterpark resorts are generally less affected by changes in
economic cycles, as drive-to destinations are less expensive and
more convenient than destinations that require air travel.
Outlook. We believe that no other operator or
developer other than Great Wolf Resorts has established a
regional portfolio of family entertainment resorts featuring
indoor waterparks. We intend to continue to expand our portfolio
of owned resorts throughout the United States and to selectively
seek licensing and management opportunities domestically and
internationally. The resorts we are currently constructing and
plan to develop in the future require significant industry
knowledge and substantial capital resources. Several of our
resorts have similar family entertainment resorts that compete
directly with them.
Our primary business objective is to increase long-term
stockholder value. We believe we can increase stockholder value
by executing our internal and external growth strategies. Our
primary internal growth strategies are to: maximize total resort
revenue; minimize costs by leveraging our economies of scale;
and build upon our existing brand awareness and loyalty in order
to compete more effectively. Our primary external growth
strategies are to: capitalize on our first-mover advantage by
being the first to develop and operate family entertainment
resorts featuring indoor waterparks in our selected target
markets; focus on development and strategic growth opportunities
by seeking to develop additional resorts and target selected
licensing and joint venture opportunities; and continue to
innovate by leveraging our in-house expertise, in conjunction
with the knowledge and experience of our third-party suppliers
and designers.
In attempting to execute our internal and external growth
strategies, we are subject to a variety of business challenges
and risks. These challenges include: development and licensing
of properties; increases in costs of constructing, operating and
maintaining our resorts; competition from other entertainment
companies, both within and outside our industry segment; and
external economic risks, including family vacation patterns and
trends. We seek to meet these challenges by providing sufficient
management oversight to site selection, development and resort
operations, concentrating on growing and strengthening awareness
of our brand and demand for our resorts, and maintaining our
focus on safety.
We believe that Traverse City and Sandusky resorts have been and
will continue to be affected by adverse general economic
circumstances in the Michigan/Ohio region (such as bankruptcies
of several major companies
and/or large
announced layoffs by major employers) and increased competition
that has occurred in these markets over the past two years. The
Michigan/Ohio region includes cities that have historically been
the Traverse City and Sandusky resorts largest suppliers
of customers. We believe the adverse general economic
39
circumstances in the region have negatively impacted overall
discretionary consumer spending in that region over the past
year and may continue to do so going forward. We believe this
has and may continue to have an impact on the operating
performance of our Traverse City and Sandusky resorts. Also, we
have experienced a
slower-than-expected
occupancy
ramp-up and
lower-than-expected
average daily room rates at our Sheboygan, Wisconsin property
since its opening in 2004. We believe this operating weakness
has been primarily attributable to the fact that the overall
development of Sheboygan as a tourist destination continues to
lag behind our initial expectations. We believe this has
impacted and will likely continue to impact the consumer demand
for our indoor waterpark resort in that market and the
operations of the resort.
Revenue and Key Performance Indicators. We
seek to generate positive cash flows and net income from each of
our owned resorts. Our rooms revenue represents sales to guests
of room nights at our resorts, and is the largest contributor to
our cash flows and profitability. Rooms revenue accounted for
approximately 67% of our total resort revenue for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2006. We employ sales and
marketing efforts to increase overall demand for rooms at our
resorts. We seek to optimize the relationship between room rates
and occupancies through the use of yield management techniques
that attempt to project demand in order to selectively increase
room rates during peak demand. These techniques are designed to
assist us in managing our higher occupancy nights to achieve
maximum rooms revenue and include such practices as:
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring our historical trends for occupancy and estimating
our high occupancy nights;
|
|
|
|
Offering the highest discounts to previous guests in off-peak
periods to build customer loyalty and enhance our ability to
charge higher rates in peak periods;
|
|
|
|
Structuring rates to allow us to offer our previous guests the
best rate while simultaneously working with a promotional
partner or offering internet specials;
|
|
|
|
Monitoring sales of room types daily to evaluate the
effectiveness of offered discounts; and
|
|
|
|
Offering specials on standard suites and yielding better rates
on larger suites when standard suites sell out.
|
In addition, we seek to maximize the amount of time and money
spent
on-site by
our guests by providing a variety of revenue-generating
amenities.
We have several key indicators that we use to evaluate the
performance of our business. These indicators include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
occupancy;
|
|
|
|
average daily room rate, or ADR;
|
|
|
|
revenue per available room, or RevPAR;
|
|
|
|
total revenue per available room, or Total RevPAR;
|
|
|
|
total revenue per occupied room, or Total RevPOR; and
|
|
|
|
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
or EBITDA.
|
Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR are commonly used measures within the
hospitality industry to evaluate hotel operations and are
defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy is calculated by dividing total occupied rooms by
total available rooms.
|
|
|
|
ADR is calculated by dividing total rooms revenue by total
occupied rooms.
|
|
|
|
RevPAR is the product of occupancy and ADR.
|
Total RevPAR and Total RevPOR are defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total RevPAR is calculated by dividing total revenue by rooms
available
|
|
|
|
Total Rev POR is calculated by dividing total revenue by
occupied rooms
|
40
Occupancy allows us to measure the general overall demand for
rooms at our resorts and the effectiveness of our sales and
marketing strategies. ADR allows us to measure the effectiveness
of our yield management strategies. While ADR and RevPAR only
include rooms revenue, Total RevPOR and Total RevPAR include
both rooms revenue and other revenue derived from food and
beverage and other amenities at our resorts. We consider Total
RevPOR and Total RevPAR to be key performance indicators for our
business because we derive a significant portion of our revenue
from food and beverage and other amenities. For the twelve
months ended December 31, 2006, approximately 33% of our
total resort revenues consisted of non-rooms revenue.
We use RevPAR and Total RevPAR to evaluate the blended effect
that changes in occupancy, ADR and Total RevPOR have on our
profitability. We focus on increasing ADR and Total RevPOR
because those increases can have the greatest positive impact on
our profitability. In addition, we seek to maximize occupancy,
as increases in occupancy generally lead to greater total
revenues at our resorts, and maintaining certain occupancy
levels is key to covering our fixed costs. Increases in total
revenues as a result of higher occupancy are, however, typically
accompanied by additional incremental costs (including
housekeeping services, utilities and room amenity costs). In
contrast, increases in total revenues from higher ADR and Total
RevPOR are typically accompanied by lower incremental costs, and
result in a greater increase in profitability.
We also use EBITDA as a measure of the operating performance of
each of our resorts. EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure,
and is not defined by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America, or GAAP. See
Non-GAAP Financial Measures for further
discussion of our use of EBITDA and a reconciliation to net
income.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and our
financial reporting process involve the use of accounting
estimates based on our current judgments. Certain accounting
estimates are particularly sensitive because of their
significance to our consolidated financial statements and
because of the possibility that future events affecting them may
differ from our current judgments.
Investments in Property and Equipment. We
record investments in property and equipment at cost.
Improvements and replacements are capitalized when they extend
the useful life, increase capacity or improve the efficiency of
the asset. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as
incurred.
Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
20-40 years
|
|
Fixtures and equipment, including
waterpark equipment
|
|
|
5-15 years
|
|
We are required to make subjective assessments as to these
useful lives for purposes of determining the amount of
depreciation and amortization to record annually with respect to
our investments in property and equipment. These assessments
have a direct impact on our net income because if we were to
shorten the expected useful lives of our investments in property
and equipment we would depreciate and amortize such investments
over fewer years, resulting in more depreciation and
amortization expense and lower net income on an annual basis. We
periodically review the estimated useful lives we have assigned
to our depreciable assets to determine whether those useful
lives are reasonable and appropriate.
When circumstances, such as adverse market conditions, indicate
the carrying values of a long-lived asset may be impaired, we
perform an analysis to review the recoverability of the
assets carrying value. We make estimates of the
undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges) from the
expected future operations of the asset. These estimates
consider factors such as expected future operating income,
operating trends and prospects, as well as the effects of
demand, competition and other factors. If the analysis indicates
that the carrying value is not recoverable from future cash
flows, an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the
carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. Any impairment
losses are recorded as operating expenses, which reduce net
income.
41
Carrying Values of Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Investment
in Affiliates. As a result of the Formation
Transactions, we recorded on our consolidated balance sheet
approximately $129,086 of goodwill and $23,829 of intangible
assets related to our Great Wolf Lodge brand name. The brand
name intangible asset has an indefinite life. In 2005 we removed
$62,091 of goodwill in conjunction with the sale of 70%
interests in our Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts. The
carrying value of our 30% interest in the joint venture that now
owns the Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts is $25,028 as of
December 31, 2006. In 2006 we removed $50,975 of goodwill
on our Traverse City and Blue Harbor resorts as the implied fair
value of the goodwill, as discussed below, was deemed less than
the carrying value.
On an annual basis, we perform analyses to determine any
impairment of the carrying values of goodwill, indefinite-lived
intangible assets and investment in affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
To test goodwill for impairment, we compare the fair value of
the individual resort to which the goodwill is assigned to the
carrying value of that resort. If the analysis indicates that
the fair value is less than the carrying value of the individual
resort, we compare the implied fair value of the resorts
goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied
fair value of the goodwill is determined by allocating the fair
value of the individual resort to all the assets and liabilities
of that resort as if it had been acquired in a business
combination. The excess of the fair value of the individual
resort over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities
is the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the implied fair
value of the goodwill is less than its carrying value, an
impairment loss is recognized. Any impairment losses are
recorded as operating expenses, which reduce net income. Our
assessment of the fair value is dependent on the operating
results of the resorts. Future adverse changes in the
hospitality and lodging industry, market conditions or poor
operating results of the underlying real estate assets could
result in future losses or the inability to recover the carrying
value of goodwill.
|
|
|
|
To test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment, we
compare the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying
amount. If the fair value of the intangible asset is less than
its carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized. Any
impairment losses are recorded as operating expenses, which
reduce net income. Future adverse changes in the hospitality and
lodging industry, market conditions or poor operating results of
the underlying real estate assets could result in future losses
or the inability to recover the carrying value of these
intangibles.
|
|
|
|
To test investment in affiliates for impairment, we compare the
fair value of the investment in affiliates with its carrying
amount. If the fair value of the investment in affiliate is less
than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized. Any
impairment losses are recorded as operating expenses, which
reduce net income. Future adverse changes in the hospitality and
lodging industry, market conditions or poor operating results of
the underlying investments could result in future losses or the
inability to recover the carrying value of this asset.
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48) Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes which prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement process for recording in the financial statements
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on the
derecognition, classification, accounting in interim periods and
disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions. The
accounting provisions of FIN 48 will be effective for us
beginning January 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating the
impact of adoption of this statement.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently
evaluating the impact of the adoption of this statement.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits
companies to choose to measure many financial assets
42
and liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected are
reported in earnings at each reporting date. SFAS 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. The provisions of this statement are required to be
applied prospectively. We are currently assessing the impact of
SFAS 159 on our consolidated financial statements.
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
We use EBITDA as a measure of our operating performance. EBITDA
is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure. EBITDA is commonly
defined as net income plus (a) net interest expense,
(b) income taxes, and (c) depreciation and
amortization.
EBITDA as calculated by us is not necessarily comparable to
similarly titled measures presented by other companies. In
addition, EBITDA (a) does not represent net income or cash
flows from operations as defined by GAAP; (b) is not
necessarily indicative of cash available to fund our cash flow
needs; and (c) should not be considered as an alternative
to net income, operating income, cash flows from operating
activities or our other financial information as determined
under GAAP.
We believe EBITDA is useful to an investor in evaluating our
operating performance because:
|
|
|
|
|
a significant portion of our assets consists of property and
equipment that are depreciated over their remaining useful lives
in accordance with GAAP. Because depreciation and amortization
are non-cash items, we believe that presentation of EBITDA is a
useful measure of our operating performance;
|
|
|
|
it is widely used in the hospitality and entertainment
industries to measure operating performance without regard to
items such as depreciation and amortization; and
|
|
|
|
we believe it helps investors meaningfully evaluate and compare
the results of our operations from period to period by removing
the impact of items directly resulting from our asset base,
primarily depreciation and amortization, from our operating
results.
|
Our management uses EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
as a measurement of operating performance because it assists us
in comparing our operating performance on a consistent basis as
it removes the impact of items directly resulting from our asset
base, primarily depreciation and amortization, from our
operating results;
|
|
|
|
for planning purposes, including the preparation of our annual
operating budget;
|
|
|
|
as a valuation measure for evaluating our operating performance
and our capacity to incur and service debt, fund capital
expenditures and expand our business; and
|
|
|
|
as one measure in determining the value of other acquisitions
and dispositions.
|
Using a measure such as EBITDA has material limitations. These
limitations include the difficulty associated with comparing
results among companies and the inability to analyze certain
significant items, including depreciation and interest expense,
which directly affect our net income or loss. Management
compensates for these limitations by considering the economic
effect of the excluded expense items independently, as well as
in connection with its analysis of net income.
43
The following table reconciles net loss to EBITDA for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2004 through
|
|
|
2004 through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 20,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,942
|
)
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
4,064
|
|
|
|
5,105
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
6,524
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(8,938
|
)
|
|
|
(7,309
|
)
|
|
|
(2,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
25,903
|
|
|
|
26,248
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
12,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(28,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
(369
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,294
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results
of Operations
General
Our and the Predecessors results of operations for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are not
directly comparable due primarily to the impact of the IPO and
the Formation Transactions, our new debt and the repayment of
debt upon the consummation of the IPO. In addition, in March
2005 our Great Wolf Lodge in Williamsburg, Virginia opened, in
October 2005 our Great Wolf Lodge in Pocono Mountains,
Pennsylvania opened, and in December 2006 our Great Wolf Lodge
in Mason, Ohio opened. Also, in October 2005 we sold 70%
interest in our Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts.
Great
Wolf Resorts Financial Information
Great Wolf Resorts consolidated financial information
includes:
|
|
|
|
|
our corporate entity that provides resort development and
management services;
|
|
|
|
our Wisconsin Dells, Sandusky, Traverse City, Kansas City,
Sheboygan, Williamsburg, Pocono Mountains, Mason, and Niagara
Falls operating resorts (we sold 70% interests in each of our
Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts in October 2005);
|
|
|
|
equity interests in resorts in which we have ownership interests
but which we do not consolidate; and
|
|
|
|
our resorts that are under construction which we will
consolidate.
|
Revenues. Our revenues consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
lodging revenue, which includes rooms, food and beverage, and
other department revenues from our resorts;
|
|
|
|
sales of condominiums;
|
|
|
|
management fee and other revenue from resorts, which includes
fees received under our management, license and development
agreements; and
|
|
|
|
other revenue from managed properties. We employ the staff at
our managed properties (except for the Niagara Falls resort).
Under our management agreements, the resort owners reimburse us
for payroll, benefits and certain other costs related to the
operations of the managed properties. Emerging Issues Task
Force, or EITF, Issue No.
01-14,
Income Statement Characteristics of Reimbursements for
Out-of-Pocket
Expenses (EITF
01-14),
establishes standards for accounting for reimbursable expenses
in our statements of operations. Under this pronouncement, the
reimbursement of payroll, benefits and costs is recorded as
revenue on our statements of operations, with a corresponding
expense recorded as other expenses from managed
properties.
|
44
Operating Expenses. Our departmental operating
expenses consist of rooms, food and beverage and other
department expenses from our resorts.
Our other operating expenses include the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
selling, general and administrative expenses, which are
associated with the operations and management of resorts and
which consist primarily of expenses such as corporate payroll
and related benefits, operations management, sales and
marketing, finance, legal, information technology support, human
resources and other support services, as well as general
corporate expenses;
|
|
|
|
property operation and maintenance expenses, such as utility
costs and property taxes;
|
|
|
|
cost of sales of condominiums;
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization;
|
|
|
|
impairment losses; and
|
|
|
|
other expenses from managed properties, which are recorded as an
expense in accordance with
EITF 01-14.
|
Great
Lakes Predecessor Financial Information
The Predecessors combined historical financial information
included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
GLC and its consolidated subsidiaries, including development of,
ownership interests in, and management contracts with respect
to, resorts and certain non-resort hotels and multifamily
housing development and management assets;
|
|
|
|
the entities that owned our Traverse City, Kansas City and
Sheboygan operating resorts; and
|
|
|
|
the entities that owned our Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains
resorts that were under construction.
|
The Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan resorts opened in
March 2003, May 2003 and June 2004, respectively. Therefore, the
Predecessors historical results of operations only
reflected operating results for Traverse City, Kansas City and
Sheboygan for those periods after the resort opening dates.
The Predecessors financial information did not include the
entities that own the Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky operating
resorts as those entities, while managed by GLC, were controlled
by affiliates of AIG SunAmerica.
Revenues. The Predecessors revenues
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
lodging revenue, which consists of rooms, food and beverage and
other department revenues from its consolidated and combined
hotels and resorts;
|
|
|
|
management fee revenue from both resort activity and non-resort
activity, which includes fees received under its management
agreements;
|
|
|
|
other revenue, which consists of accounting fees, development
fees, central reservation fees, construction management fees and
other fees; and
|
|
|
|
other revenue from managed properties, which are recorded as
revenue in accordance with EITF
01-14.
|
Operating Expenses. The Predecessors
departmental operating expenses consisted of rooms, food and
beverage and other department expenses from its consolidated and
combined hotels and resorts.
The Predecessors other operating expenses included the
following items:
|
|
|
|
|
selling, general and administrative expenses, which were
associated with the management of hotels and resorts and which
consist primarily of expenses such as corporate payroll and
related benefits, operations management, sales and marketing,
finance, legal, information technology support, human resources
and other support services, as well as general corporate
expenses;
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
property operation and maintenance expenses;
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization; and
|
|
|
|
other expenses from managed properties, which are recorded as an
expense in accordance with
EITF 01-14.
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 compared with Year Ended
December 31, 2005
The following table shows key operating statistics for our
resorts for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Properties(a)
|
|
|
Same Store Comparison(b)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
63.5
|
%
|
|
|
63.1
|
%
|
|
|
60.5
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
ADR
|
|
$
|
240.04
|
|
|
$
|
211.27
|
|
|
$
|
209.71
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
RevPAR
|
|
$
|
152.41
|
|
|
$
|
133.41
|
|
|
$
|
126.93
|
|
|
$
|
6.48
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Total RevPOR
|
|
$
|
361.85
|
|
|
$
|
316.84
|
|
|
$
|
315.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Total RevPAR
|
|
$
|
229.76
|
|
|
$
|
200.08
|
|
|
$
|
190.89
|
|
|
$
|
9.19
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes results for properties that were open for any portion
of the period. |
|
(b) |
|
Same store comparison includes properties that were open for the
majority of the period in 2005 and 2006 (that is, our Wisconsin
Dells, Sandusky, Traverse City, Kansas City, Sheboygan, and
Williamsburg resorts). |
In 2005 we opened two resorts: our Williamsburg
resort opened in March 2005 and our Pocono Mountains resort
opened in October 2005. Also in October 2005 we sold 70% equity
interests in our Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts to a third
party. Following the sale of the 70% interests in these two
resorts, we no longer consolidate those resorts operations
in our operating results, but instead account for them under the
equity method, through equity in unconsolidated affiliates.
Also, on December 14, 2006, we opened our Mason resort. As
a result, total revenue, rooms revenue and other revenue for the
year ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are
not directly comparable.
Presented below are selected amounts from our consolidated
statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
148,648
|
|
|
$
|
139,415
|
|
|
$
|
9,233
|
|
Departmental operating expenses
|
|
|
47,837
|
|
|
|
42,351
|
|
|
|
5,486
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
41,421
|
|
|
|
26,894
|
|
|
|
14,527
|
|
Property operating costs
|
|
|
23,217
|
|
|
|
24,798
|
|
|
|
(1,581
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
25,903
|
|
|
|
26,248
|
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
50,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,975
|
|
Cost of sales of condominiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,780
|
|
|
|
(16,780
|
)
|
Loss on sale of property
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
26,161
|
|
|
|
(25,095
|
)
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
(53,691
|
)
|
|
|
(26,341
|
)
|
|
|
(27,350
|
)
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
4,064
|
|
|
|
5,105
|
|
|
|
(1,041
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(8,764
|
)
|
|
|
(7,199
|
)
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
|
(24,837
|
)
|
Revenues. Total revenues increased primarily
due to revenues related to the Williamsburg, Pocono Mountains,
and Mason Family resorts, which opened in March 2005, October
2005 and December 2006,
46
respectively; and management and other fees and other revenues
from managed properties related to our joint venture with CNL
Income Properties, Inc. (CNL). These increases were partially
offset by there being no revenue related to sales of
condominiums during 2006, and by the reduction in resort revenue
due to the sale of 70% of our equity interests in our Wisconsin
Dells and Sandusky resorts in October 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues for the Williamsburg, Pocono Mountains and Mason
resorts were $79,020 and $26,242 for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Total management and other fees related to our joint ventures
were $3,729 and $482 for the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Other revenue from managed properties was $11,920 and $2,524 for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Revenue from sales of condominiums at our Wisconsin Dells resort
was $25,862 for the year ended December 31, 2005. We had no
similar revenue during the year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
Total revenues for the Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts were
$30,212 for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
Operating expenses. Total operating expenses
increased primarily due to the increase in operating expenses in
Williamsburg, Pocono Mountains and Mason Family resorts, which
opened in March 2005, October 2005, and December 2006,
respectively; and other expense from managed properties related
to the CNL joint venture. These increases were partially offset
by there being no cost of sales of condominiums during the year
ended December 31, 2006, as there was for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and by the reduction in resort expenses
due to the sale of 70% of our equity interests in our Wisconsin
Dells and Sandusky resorts in October 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
Total departmental operating expenses for the Williamsburg,
Pocono Mountains and Mason resorts were $28,853 and $11,330 for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Total departmental expenses for the Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky
resorts were $11,169 for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Total selling, general and administrative expenses for the
Williamsburg, Pocono Mountains, and Mason resorts were $18,247
and $5,097 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Total selling, general and administrative expenses
for the Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts were $7,133 for the
year ended December 31, 2005. During the year ended
December 31, 2006 our corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses included increases over that of the year
ended December 31, 2005 related to share based compensation
of $5,113, compensation-related expenses of $1,499 due to
increased staffing at our corporate office and $1,663 related to
professional fees.
|
|
|
|
Total property operating costs (exclusive of opening costs) for
the Williamsburg, Pocono Mountains, and Mason resorts were
$7,509 for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to
$6,371 for the year ended December 31, 2005. Total property
operating costs (exclusive of opening costs) for the resorts in
Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky were $3,822 for the year ended
December 31, 2005. Opening costs related primarily to our
Pocono Mountains, Mason Family, Grapevine and Grand Mound
resorts and the resort in Niagara Falls were $7,297 for the year
ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $5,309 for the year
ended December 31, 2005 related to our resorts in
Williamsburg and the Pocono Mountains and the condominiums in
Wisconsin Dells.
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization for the Williamsburg, Pocono
Mountains and Mason resorts was $13,707 and $8,059 for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total
depreciation and amortization for the Wisconsin Dells and
Sandusky resorts was $5,769 for the year ended December 31,
2005.
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2006 we recorded a goodwill
impairment charge of $50,975 related to our Traverse City and
Sheboygan resorts, as the implied fair value of the goodwill was
deemed less than the carrying value.
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of condominiums of $16,780 relates to the
condominiums sold at our Wisconsin Dells resort during the year
ended December 31, 2005. We did not incur a similar charge
during the year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of real estate of $1,066 during the year ended
December 31, 2006 primarily relates to finalization of the
accounting for the sale of 70% of our equity interests in the
Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts in October 2005 as compared
to the loss on sale of real estate of $26,161 recorded in 2005
related to the 70% interest sold in our Wisconsin Dells and
Sandusky resorts.
|
Net operating loss. Net operating loss for
2006 increased $27,350 to $(53,691) from $(26,341) for 2005.
Net loss. Net loss increased primarily due to
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
A increase in net operating loss from $(26,341) for 2005 to
$(53,691) for 2006.
|
|
|
|
A decrease in net interest expense of $1,041 mainly due to
higher interest income for 2006 as compared to 2005.
|
|
|
|
A increase of an income tax benefit of $1,565 for 2006 as
compared to 2005.
|
Year
ended December 31, 2005 for Great Wolf Resorts compared
with the year ended December 31, 2004 for the Great Wolf
Resorts/Predecessor
Presented below are selected amounts from the statements of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
To facilitate a meaningful analysis of the results of
operations, amounts for the year ended December 31, 2004
include both the historical operations of the Predecessor in
2004 (for the period January 1, 2004 through
December 20, 2004) and our operations from
December 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf
|
|
|
Resorts/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resorts
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
139,415
|
|
|
$
|
69,887
|
|
|
$
|
69,528
|
|
Departmental operating expenses
|
|
|
42,351
|
|
|
|
19,851
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
26,894
|
|
|
|
25,985
|
|
|
|
909
|
|
Property operating costs
|
|
|
24,798
|
|
|
|
9,105
|
|
|
|
15,693
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,248
|
|
|
|
14,822
|
|
|
|
11,426
|
|
Cost of sales of condominiums
|
|
|
16,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,780
|
|
Loss on sale of property
|
|
|
26,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,161
|
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
(26,341
|
)
|
|
|
(14,429
|
)
|
|
|
(11,912
|
)
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
5,105
|
|
|
|
6,738
|
|
|
|
(1,633
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(7,199
|
)
|
|
|
(2,563
|
)
|
|
|
(4,636
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
|
(16,784
|
)
|
|
|
(7,629
|
)
|
Revenues. Total revenues increased primarily
due to revenues related to the resorts in Wisconsin Dells and
Sandusky, which were purchased as part of the IPO in December
2004 (and then sold in October 2005); the opening of the
Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains resorts in March 2005 and
October 2005, respectively; and the sale of condominiums at our
Wisconsin Dells resort. Also, our Sheboygan resort, which opened
in June 2004, had a full year of operations in 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues for the resorts in Wisconsin Dells, Sandusky,
Sheboygan, Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains were $68,504 and
$10,285 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Revenue from sales of condominiums at our Wisconsin Dells resort
was $25,862 for the year ended December 31, 2005. We had no
similar sales during the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
The net increase in resort and condominium revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2005, versus the year ended
December 31, 2004, was offset by $12,029 decrease in other
revenue related to managed properties recorded in the year ended
December 31, 2005, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2004.
|
Operating expenses. Total operating expenses
increased primarily due to expenses related to the resorts in
Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky, which were purchased as part of
the IPO in December 2004 (and then sold in October 2005); the
opening of the Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains resorts in
March 2005 and October 2005, respectively; and the sale of
condominiums at our Wisconsin Dells resort. Also, our Sheboygan
resort, which opened in June 2004, had a full year of operations
in 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
Total departmental expenses for the resorts in Wisconsin Dells,
Sandusky, Sheboygan, Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains were
$28,210 and $4,827 for the years ended December 31, 2005
and December 31, 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Total selling, general and administrative expenses for the
resorts in Wisconsin Dells, Sandusky, Sheboygan, Williamsburg
and Pocono Mountains were $16,527 and $4,927 for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses in the year ended
December 31, 2004 included $6,413 of IPO related charges
and a $1,147 write off of development related expenses. We did
not incur similar charges during the year ended
December 31, 2005. Also, selling, general and
administrative expenses in the year ending December 31,
2004, included a non-cash employee compensation expense of $691.
We recorded non-cash employee compensation income of $1,554 in
the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Total property operating costs for the resorts in Wisconsin
Dells, Sandusky, Sheboygan, Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains
were $17,447 and $3,260 for the years ended December 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Property
operating costs include pre-opening costs related to our Pocono
Mountains and Williamsburg resorts of $7,791 for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as compared to pre-opening costs related
to our Sheboygan resort of $1,729 for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization for the resorts in Wisconsin
Dells, Sandusky, Sheboygan, Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains
was $17,697 and $3,750 for the years ended December 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The net increase
in depreciation and amortization also includes the effect of a
change made in the first quarter of 2005 to the estimate of
useful lives used to depreciate our property and equipment,
which resulted in a decrease in depreciation for our resorts in
Traverse City and Kansas City in the year ended
December 31, 2005, as compared to December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of condominiums of $16,780 relates to the
condominiums sold at our Wisconsin Dells resort in 2005. A
similar type charge was not incurred during 2004.
|
|
|
|
A loss of $26,161 recorded related to the 70% interests sold in
our Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts.
|
Net operating loss. Net operating loss for
2005 increased $11,912 to $(26,341) from $(14,429) for 2004.
Net loss. Net loss increased primarily due to
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in net operating loss.
|
|
|
|
A gain on sale of investments of $1,653 was recorded for the
year ended December 31, 2004. No comparable gain was
recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations of $1,928 was recorded for
the year ended December 31, 2004. No comparable amount was
recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
The increase in net loss was partially offset by a $4,636
increase in the tax benefit recorded for the year ended
December 31, 2005 as compared to the tax benefit recorded
for the period December 21, 2005 through December 31,
2005.
49
Segments
We are organized into a single operating division. Within that
operating division, we have three reportable segments in 2006:
resort ownership/operation, resort third-party management and
condominium sales. The resort ownership/operation segment
derives its revenues from the ownership/operation of our
consolidated owned resorts; the resort third-party management
segment derives its revenue from management, license and other
related fees from unconsolidated managed resorts and from other
revenues recorded in accordance with EITF
01-14; and
the condominium sales segment derives its revenues from sales of
condominium units to third-party owners. We evaluate the
performance of each segment based on earnings before interest,
income taxes, and depreciation and amortization (EBITDA),
excluding minority interests and equity in earnings of
unconsolidated affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Resort
Ownership/Operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
130,912
|
|
|
$
|
110,053
|
|
|
$
|
20,859
|
|
EBITDA, excluding certain items
|
|
|
26,729
|
|
|
|
(9,353
|
)
|
|
|
36,082
|
|
Resort Third-Party
Mgmt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
17,736
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
14,236
|
|
EBITDA, excluding certain items
|
|
|
5,817
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
Condominium Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,862
|
|
|
|
(25,862
|
)
|
EBITDA, excluding certain items
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
9,082
|
|
|
|
(9,452
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA, excluding certain items
|
|
|
(8,989
|
)
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
|
(8,191
|
)
|
The Other items in the table above represent corporate-level
activities that do not constitute a reportable segment.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2006, we had total indebtedness of
$289,389, summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
Traverse City/Kansas City mortgage
loan
|
|
$
|
72,801
|
|
Mason construction loan
|
|
|
55,792
|
|
Pocono Mountains mortgage loan
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
51,550
|
|
Other Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
City of Sheboygan bonds
|
|
|
8,383
|
|
City of Sheboygan loan
|
|
|
3,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
289,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traverse City/Kansas City Mortgage Loan This
loan is secured by our Traverse City and Kansas City resorts.
The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.96%, is subject to
a 25-year
principal amortization schedule, and matures in January 2015.
The loan has customary financial and operating debt compliance
covenants, including a minimum debt service coverage ratio,
representing the combined EBITDA (adjusted for non-recurring
items, unusual items, infrequent items and asset impairment
charges) minus 4% of the revenues of two resorts divided by
their combined annual interest expense and principal
amortization. The loan also has customary prohibitions on our
ability to prepay the loan prior to maturity. We were in
compliance with all covenants under this loan at
December 31, 2006.
50
Mason Construction Loan In December 2005 we
closed on a $76,800 loan to construct the Great Wolf Lodge in
Mason, Ohio. The loan is secured by a first mortgage on the
Mason, Ohio property and matures in December 2008. The loan also
has two one-year extensions after the initial
3-year term
available at our option. The lenders have a construction and
debt service guaranty from us. In conjunction with the debt
service guaranty, we must maintain a maximum ratio of long-term
debt minus cash divided by consolidated trailing twelve month
adjusted EBITDA of 6.50x and a minimum tangible net worth of
$200,000 or greater. The construction guaranty expires at the
opening date of the resort and the debt service guaranty expires
once the resort achieves a trailing cash flow threshold. The
loan bears interest at a floating rate of 30 day LIBOR plus
a spread of 265 basis points (total rate of 7.98% as of
December 31, 2006). The loan is interest only during the
initial three-year term and then is subject to a
25-year
amortization schedule in the extension years. The loan has
customary covenants associated with an individual mortgaged
property. There are no prohibitions or fees associated with the
repayment of the loan principal. We were in compliance with all
covenants under this loan at December 31, 2006.
Pocono Mountains Mortgage Loan In December
2006 we closed on a $97,000 first mortgage loan secured by our
Pocono Mountains resort. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate
of 6.10% and matures January 1, 2017. The loan is interest
only for the initial
18-month
period and thereafter is subject to a
30-year
principal amortization schedule. The loan has customary
covenants associated with an individual mortgaged property. The
loan also has customary prohibitions on our ability to prepay
the loan prior to maturity. We were in compliance with all
covenants under this loan at December 31, 2006.
Junior Subordinated Debentures In March 2005
we completed a private offering of $50,000 of trust preferred
securities (TPS) through Great Wolf Capital Trust I (the
Trust), a Delaware statutory trust which is our subsidiary. The
securities pay holders cumulative cash distributions at an
annual rate which is fixed at 7.80% through March 2015 and then
floats at LIBOR + 310 basis points thereafter. The
securities mature in March 2035 and are callable at no premium
after March 2010. In addition, we invested $1,500 in the
Trusts common securities, representing 3% of the total
capitalization of the Trust.
The Trust used the proceeds of the offering and our investment
to purchase from us $51,550 of our junior subordinated
debentures with payment terms that mirror the distribution terms
of the trust securities. The costs of the trust preferred
offering totaled $1,600, including $1,500 of underwriting
commissions and expenses and $100 of costs incurred directly by
the Trust. The Trust paid these costs utilizing an investment
from us. These costs are being amortized over a
30-year
period. The proceeds from our debenture sale, net of the costs
of the trust preferred offering and our investment in the Trust,
were $48,400. We used the net proceeds to retire the Pocono
Mountains construction loan.
As a result of the issuance of FASB Interpretation No. 46R,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities and the
accounting professions application of the guidance
provided by the FASB, issue trusts, like the Trust, are
generally variable interest entities. We have determined that we
are not the primary beneficiary under the Trust, and accordingly
we do not include the financial statements of the Trust in our
consolidated financial statements.
Based on the foregoing accounting authority, our consolidated
financial statements present the debentures issued to the Trust
as long-term debt. Our investment in the Trust is accounted as a
cost investment and is included in other assets. For financial
reporting purposes, we record interest expense on the
corresponding debentures in our consolidated statements of
operations.
City of Sheboygan Bonds The City of Sheboygan
(the City) bonds represent the face amount of bond anticipation
notes (BANs) issued by the City in November 2003 in conjunction
with the construction of the Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan,
Wisconsin. In accordance with the provisions of EITF Issue
No. 91-10,
we have recognized as a liability the obligations for the BANs.
The notes bear interest at an annual rate of 3.95% and mature in
2008. The notes are not a general obligation of the City and are
payable from (a) the proceeds of bond anticipation notes or
other funds appropriated by the City for the payment of interest
on the BANs and (b) the proceeds to be delivered from the
issuance and sale of securities by the City. We have an
obligation to fund payment of these BANs. Our obligation to fund
repayment of the notes will be satisfied by
51
certain minimum guaranteed amounts of room tax payments to be
made by the Blue Harbor Resort through 2028.
City of Sheboygan Loan The City of Sheboygan
loan amount represents a loan made by the City in 2004 in
conjunction with the construction of the Blue Harbor Resort in
Sheboygan, Wisconsin. The loan is noninterest bearing and
matures in 2018. Our obligation to repay the loan will be
satisfied by certain minimum guaranteed amounts of real and
personal property tax payments to be made by the Blue Harbor
Resort through 2018.
Future Maturities Future principal
requirements on long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,764
|
|
2010
|
|
|
58,749
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,165
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
221,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
289,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term
Liquidity Requirements
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds
necessary to pay operating expenses, including:
|
|
|
|
|
recurring maintenance, repairs and other operating expenses
necessary to properly maintain and operate our resorts;
|
|
|
|
property taxes and insurance expenses;
|
|
|
|
interest expense and scheduled principal payments on outstanding
indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
general and administrative expenses; and
|
|
|
|
income taxes.
|
Historically, we have satisfied our short-term liquidity
requirements through operating cash flows and cash on hand. We
believe that cash provided by our operations, together with cash
on hand, will be sufficient to fund our requirements for working
capital, capital expenditures and debt service for the next
twelve months.
Long-Term
Liquidity Requirements
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds
necessary to pay for:
|
|
|
|
|
scheduled debt maturities;
|
|
|
|
capital contributions and loans to unconsolidated joint ventures;
|
|
|
|
renovations, expansions and other non-recurring capital
expenditures that need to be made periodically to our
resorts; and
|
|
|
|
costs associated with the development of new resorts.
|
We expect to meet these needs through existing working capital,
cash provided by operations and a combination of mortgage
financing on properties being developed, proceeds from investing
activities (such as the sale of newly-constructed condominiums
at our existing resorts or sale of majority ownership interest
in certain resorts), additional borrowings under future credit
facilities, and the issuance of equity instruments, including
common stock, or additional or replacement debt, if market
conditions permit. We believe these sources of capital will be
sufficient to provide for our long-term capital needs.
52
Our largest long-term expenditures are expected to be for
investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and capital
expenditures for development of future consolidated resorts. Our
expenditures for such items were $120,523 for the year ended
December 31, 2006. We expect to have approximately $160,300
of such expenditures in 2007 and $14,500 in 2008. As discussed
above, we expect to meet these requirements through a
combination of cash provided by operations, cash on hand,
proceeds from investing activities and new
and/or
existing mortgage financing on properties being developed.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have two unconsolidated joint venture arrangements at
December 31, 2006. We account for our unconsolidated joint
ventures using the equity method of accounting. Our joint
venture with CNL Income Properties, Inc. (CNL) owns two resorts,
Great Wolf Lodge-Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin and Great Wolf
Lodge-Sandusky, Ohio. We are a limited partner in the CNL joint
venture with a 30% ownership interest. At December 31,
2006, the joint venture had aggregate outstanding indebtedness
to third parties of approximately $63,000. This loan is a
mortgage loan that is non-recourse to us.
We entered into our joint venture with The Confederated Tribes
of the Chehalis Reservation to develop a Great Wolf Lodge resort
and conference center on a
39-acre land
parcel in Grand Mound, Washington. This joint venture is a
limited liability company; we are a member of that limited
liability company with a 49% ownership interest.
As capital may be required to fund the activities of these
resorts, we may be required to fund in the future the joint
ventures shares of the costs not funded by the majority
owner of the joint venture, the joint ventures operations or
outside financing. Based on the nature of the activities
conducted in these joint ventures, management cannot estimate
with any degree of accuracy amounts that we may be required to
fund in the long-term. Management does not currently believe
that any additional future funding of these joint ventures
other than the initial capital contributions to the joint
ventures, will have an adverse effect on our financial
condition, however, as we do not expect to make significant
future capital contributions to these joint ventures.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Terms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Debt Obligations(1)
|
|
$
|
289,389
|
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
|
$
|
4,716
|
|
|
$
|
61,914
|
|
|
$
|
221,327
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction Contracts
|
|
|
79,867
|
|
|
|
79,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
370,474
|
|
|
$
|
81,763
|
|
|
$
|
5,470
|
|
|
$
|
61,914
|
|
|
$
|
221,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $8,383 of fixed rate debt recognized as a liability
related to certain bonds issued by the City of Sheboygan and
$3,863 of fixed rate debt recognized as a liability related to a
loan from the City of Sheboygan. These liabilities will be
satisfied by certain future minimum guaranteed amounts of real
and personal property tax payments and room tax payments to be
made by our Sheboygan resort. |
As we develop future resorts, we expect to incur significant
additional debt and construction contract obligations.
Working
Capital
We had $96,778 of available cash and cash equivalents and
working capital of $55,365 (current assets less current
liabilities) at December 31, 2006, compared to the $54,782
of available cash and cash equivalents and $33,433 of working
capital at December 31, 2005.
53
Cash
Flows
Comparison
of Year Ended December 31, 2006 to Year Ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
29,723
|
|
|
$
|
17,788
|
|
|
$
|
11,935
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(107,123
|
)
|
|
|
(65,496
|
)
|
|
|
(41,627
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
119,396
|
|
|
|
23,081
|
|
|
|
96,315
|
|
Operating Activities. The increase in net cash
provided by operating activities resulted primarily from a
reduction in the net operating loss excluding our impairment
loss for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in
investing activities was lower for the year ended
December 31, 2005 as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2006 primarily because of the cash received
due to the sale of 70% interests in 2005 of our Wisconsin Dells
and Sandusky resorts.
Financing Activities. The increase in net cash
provided by financing activities resulted primarily from
proceeds from our Pocono Mountains mortgage loan for $97,000.
Comparison
of Year Ended December 31, 2005 for the Company to Year
Ended December 31, 2004 for the Predecessor/Great Wolf
Resorts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf
|
|
|
Resorts/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resorts
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
17,788
|
|
|
$
|
4,399
|
|
|
$
|
13,389
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(65,496
|
)
|
|
|
(162,055
|
)
|
|
|
96,559
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
23,081
|
|
|
|
233,575
|
|
|
|
(210,494
|
)
|
Operating Activities. The increase in net cash
provided by operating activities for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2004, resulted from a decrease in accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities and prepaid
expenses and other assets. This decrease was offset by higher
depreciation in the 2005 period.
Investing Activities. The decrease in net cash
used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2004, resulted primarily from an increase in
proceeds from the sale of assets in the 2005 period as compared
to the 2004 period. Also, in 2004 we purchased the resorts as
part of the IPO.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by
financing activities decreased for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003 primarily due to the effect of the IPO in
2004.
Inflation
We are able to change room and amenity rates at our resort
properties on a daily basis, so the impact of higher inflation
can often be passed along to customers. However, a weak economic
environment that decreased overall demand for our products and
services could restrict our ability to raise room and amenity
rates to offset rising costs.
54
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to
financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market
interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from
adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. In the
future, we may use derivative financial instruments to manage or
hedge interest rate risks related to our borrowings. We do not
intend to use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes
and anticipate entering into derivative contracts only with
major financial institutions with investment grade credit
ratings.
Our earnings are also affected by the changes in our interest
rates due to the impact those changes have on our interest
income from cash and short-term investments, and our interest
expense from variable-rate debt instruments. As of
December 31, 2006, we had total indebtedness of
approximately $289,389. This debt consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
$72,801 of fixed rate debt secured by two of our resorts. This
debt bears interest at 6.96%.
|
|
|
|
$51,550 of subordinated debentures that bear interest at
a fixed rate of 7.80% through March 2015 and then at a floating
rate of LIBOR plus 310 basis points thereafter. The securities
mature in March 2035.
|
|
|
|
$97,000 of fixed rate debt secured by one of our resorts.
This debt bears interest at 6.10%
|
|
|
|
$55,792 of variable rate debt secured by one of our
resorts. This debt bears interest at a floating rate of
30 day LIBOR plus a spread of 265 basis points. The total
rate was 7.98% at December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
$8,383 of fixed rate debt (effective interest rate of 10.67%)
recognized as a liability related to certain bonds issued by the
City of Sheboygan and $3,863 of noninterest bearing debt
recognized as a liability related to a loan from the City of
Sheboygan. These liabilities will be satisfied by certain future
minimum guaranteed amounts of real and personal property tax
payments and room tax payments to be made by the Sheboygan
resort; and
|
As of December 31, 2006, we estimate the total fair value
of the indebtedness described above to be $8,377 more than their
total carrying values, due to the terms of the existing debt
being different than those terms we believe would currently be
available to us for indebtedness with similar risks and
remaining maturities.
If the prime rate
and/or LIBOR
were to increase by 1% or 100 basis points, the increase in
interest expense on our variable rate debt would decrease future
earnings and cash flows by approximately $558 annually. If the
prime rate were to decrease by 1% or 100 basis points, the
decrease in interest expense on our variable rate debt would be
approximately $558 annually.
55
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
The following consolidated and combined financial statements are
filed as part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements of Great Wolf Resorts and Subsidiaries and
Great Lakes Predecessor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Notes to Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements
|
|
|
62
|
|
56
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.
Madison, Wisconsin
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company), as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and
cash flows of the Company for the years ended December 31,
2006 and 2005, and the period from December 21, 2004
(commencement of operations) through December 31, 2004, and
the related combined statements of operations, equity and cash
flows of Great Lakes Predecessor, as defined in Note 1 to
the combined financial statements, for the period from
January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004. These
consolidated and combined financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
and combined financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of the
Company as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the consolidated
results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the period from
December 21, 2004 (commencement of operations) through
December 31, 2004, and the combined results of operations
and cash flows of Great Lakes Predecessor for the period from
January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial
statements, on January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
March 7, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting and an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 7, 2007
57
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
96,778
|
|
|
$
|
54,782
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts of $205 and $95
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
|
2,506
|
|
Accounts receivable
affiliates
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
|
|
12,825
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4,638
|
|
|
|
1,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
109,144
|
|
|
|
74,363
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
489,968
|
|
|
|
385,391
|
|
Investment in affiliates
|
|
|
25,028
|
|
|
|
43,207
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
19,450
|
|
|
|
11,741
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
23,829
|
|
|
|
23,829
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
16,020
|
|
|
|
66,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
683,439
|
|
|
$
|
605,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTERESTS
AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
|
$
|
1,928
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
25,882
|
|
|
|
18,183
|
|
Accrued payroll
|
|
|
2,768
|
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
12,740
|
|
|
|
7,258
|
|
Accrued expenses
affiliates
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
3,576
|
|
Advance deposits
|
|
|
7,165
|
|
|
|
5,680
|
|
Gift certificates payable
|
|
|
3,349
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
53,779
|
|
|
|
40,930
|
|
Mortgage debt
|
|
|
275,711
|
|
|
|
154,092
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
12,246
|
|
|
|
12,308
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
15,846
|
|
|
|
25,800
|
|
Deferred compensation liability
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
360,173
|
|
|
|
235,022
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
5,757
|
|
|
|
6,593
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par
value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 30,509,320 and
30,277,308 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
396,909
|
|
|
|
394,212
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par
value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or
outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(77,505
|
)
|
|
|
(28,255
|
)
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(2,200
|
)
|
|
|
(2,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
317,509
|
|
|
|
363,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, minority
interests and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
683,439
|
|
|
$
|
605,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial
statements.
58
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21,
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 through
|
|
|
|
2004 through
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 20,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
$
|
87,775
|
|
|
$
|
73,207
|
|
|
$
|
3,261
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,438
|
|
Food and beverage
|
|
|
21,930
|
|
|
|
18,897
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
|
8,255
|
|
Other hotel operations
|
|
|
21,207
|
|
|
|
17,949
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
|
7,855
|
|
Sales of condominiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management and other fees
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management and other
fees related parties
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,728
|
|
|
|
136,891
|
|
|
|
4,629
|
|
|
|
|
50,705
|
|
Other revenue from managed
properties-related parties
|
|
|
11,920
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
148,648
|
|
|
|
139,415
|
|
|
|
4,629
|
|
|
|
|
65,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses by department:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
11,914
|
|
|
|
10,944
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
Food and beverage
|
|
|
18,806
|
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
|
7,370
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17,117
|
|
|
|
14,875
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
6,308
|
|
Other operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
41,421
|
|
|
|
26,894
|
|
|
|
7,372
|
|
|
|
|
18,613
|
|
Property operating costs
|
|
|
23,217
|
|
|
|
24,798
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
8,810
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
25,903
|
|
|
|
26,248
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
12,925
|
|
Cost of sales of condominiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
50,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of property
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
26,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,419
|
|
|
|
163,232
|
|
|
|
10,820
|
|
|
|
|
58,943
|
|
Other expenses from managed
properties-related parties
|
|
|
11,920
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
202,339
|
|
|
|
165,756
|
|
|
|
10,820
|
|
|
|
|
73,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
(53,691
|
)
|
|
|
(26,341
|
)
|
|
|
(6,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8,238
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3,105
|
)
|
|
|
(1,623
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,169
|
|
|
|
6,728
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
6,748
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,653
|
)
|
Interest on mandatorily redeemable
shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes, minority
interests, and equity in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(57,755
|
)
|
|
|
(31,446
|
)
|
|
|
(6,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14,870
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(8,764
|
)
|
|
|
(7,199
|
)
|
|
|
(2,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in unconsolidated
affiliates, net of tax
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14,870
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(12,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(1.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(1.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
30,299,647
|
|
|
|
30,134,146
|
|
|
|
30,132,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
30,299,647
|
|
|
|
30,134,146
|
|
|
|
30,132,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial
statements.
59
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Entities
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Predecessor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,256
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,263
|
|
|
$
|
(824
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,183
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,788
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,704
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 20, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,350
|
|
|
$
|
(824
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Resorts,
Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification, net of effect of
spin-off, of Predecessors equity, mandatorily redeemable
ownership interests and minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
45,727
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,777
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of common
stock
|
|
|
16,100,000
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
248,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,667
|
|
Issuance of common
stock acquisition of resorts
|
|
|
14,032,896
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
97,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common
stock deferred compensation plan
|
|
|
129,412
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
30,262,308
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
394,060
|
|
|
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
(2,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,321
|
|
Issuance of non-vested equity shares
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of non-vested equity
shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
30,277,308
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
394,212
|
|
|
|
(28,255
|
)
|
|
|
(2,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363,911
|
|
Issuance of non-vested equity shares
|
|
|
232,012
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Reclassification of unearned
compensation to additional paid-in capital upon the adoption of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) See
Note 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
Share issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
30,509,320
|
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
$
|
396,909
|
|
|
$
|
(77,505
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,200
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
317,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial
statements.
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21,
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 through
|
|
|
|
2004 through
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 20,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(12,942
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
25,903
|
|
|
|
26,248
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
13,107
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
50,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash employee compensation
expenses
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
(1,554
|
)
|
|
|
2,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
26,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,327
|
)
|
Gain on sale of investments and
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,653
|
)
|
Equity in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
(9,500
|
)
|
|
|
(7,504
|
)
|
|
|
(2,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
|
|
4,107
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
|
(9,236
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other liabilities
|
|
|
2,430
|
|
|
|
(2,774
|
)
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
|
16,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
29,723
|
|
|
|
17,788
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
|
3,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for property
and equipment
|
|
|
(120,523
|
)
|
|
|
(124,905
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
(108,804
|
)
|
Cash distributions from
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
18,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in affiliates
|
|
|
(523
|
)
|
|
|
(1,519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in development
|
|
|
(4,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
59,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,174
|
|
Purchases of owners interest,
net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(1,282
|
)
|
|
|
(1,305
|
)
|
|
|
(2,008
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in escrow
|
|
|
(1,172
|
)
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,564
|
)
|
Decrease in equity escrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(107,123
|
)
|
|
|
(65,496
|
)
|
|
|
(97,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
(64,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from equity offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(31,978
|
)
|
|
|
(50,049
|
)
|
|
|
(152,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16,805
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term
debt
|
|
|
153,039
|
|
|
|
75,712
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
68,330
|
|
Payment of loan costs
|
|
|
(1,665
|
)
|
|
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
(2,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,569
|
)
|
Member contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,788
|
|
Member distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,370
|
)
|
Changes in mandatorily redeemable
ownership interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
Net distributions to minority
investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
119,396
|
|
|
|
23,081
|
|
|
|
172,151
|
|
|
|
|
61,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
41,996
|
|
|
|
(24,627
|
)
|
|
|
75,330
|
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
|
54,782
|
|
|
|
79,409
|
|
|
|
4,079
|
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period
|
|
$
|
96,778
|
|
|
$
|
54,782
|
|
|
$
|
79,409
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of
capitalized interest
|
|
$
|
6,036
|
|
|
$
|
3,605
|
|
|
$
|
698
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,317
|
|
Cash paid (refunds) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(471
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,128
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land contributed for minority
interest
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Construction in process accruals
|
|
$
|
10,101
|
|
|
$
|
8,648
|
|
|
$
|
18,578
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Escrow funds receivable
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,825
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial
statements.
61
The terms Great Wolf Resorts, us,
we and our are used in this report to
refer to Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries.
Formation
We were formed to succeed to certain businesses of the Great
Lakes Predecessor (the Predecessor), which was not a legal
entity but rather a combination of numerous entities, all of
which were under common management. These entities were involved
in the development, ownership and operation of resorts, hotels
and multifamily housing projects. The Predecessor financial
statements do not include entities that owned Great Wolf Lodges
of Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin and Sandusky, Ohio. These entities
were controlled by affiliates of AIG SunAmerica, Inc.
We were incorporated in May 2004 as a Delaware corporation in
anticipation of the initial public offering of our common stock
(the IPO). The IPO closed on December 20, 2004,
concurrently with the completion of various formation
transactions (the Formation Transactions).
Pursuant to the Formation Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
The Predecessor contributed its hotel management and multifamily
housing management and development assets, which were unrelated
to the resort business, to two subsidiaries of the Predecessor
and then distributed the interests in those subsidiaries to the
former shareholders of The Great Lakes Companies, Inc. (GLC)
(one of the Predecessors entities).
|
|
|
|
We acquired GLC and seven resort-owning entities. Pursuant to
these acquisitions, investors of GLC and the resort-owning
entities received cash, unregistered shares of our common stock
or a combination of cash and unregistered shares of our common
stock. We issued 13,901,947 shares of our common stock and
paid approximately $97,600 in cash in connection with these
acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
We issued an aggregate of 130,949 shares of unregistered
common stock to holders of tenant in common interests in two of
our resorts.
|
These transactions consolidated the ownership of our resort
properties and property interests to Great Wolf Resorts. During
the period from our formation until we commenced operations upon
closing of the IPO on December 20, 2004, we did not have
any material corporate activity.
The IPO consisted of the sale of 16,100,000 shares of
common stock at a price per share of $17.00, generating gross
proceeds of $273,700. The net proceeds to us were approximately
$248,700 after deducting an aggregate of $19,200 in underwriting
discounts and commissions paid to the underwriters and $5,800 in
other expenses directly related to the issuance of common stock
(such as professional fees and printing fees) incurred in
connection with the IPO.
Business
Summary
We are a family entertainment resort company that provides our
guests with a high-quality vacation at an affordable price. We
are the largest owner, operator and developer in North America
of drive-to family resorts featuring indoor waterparks and other
family-oriented entertainment activities. Our resorts generally
feature approximately 270 to 400 family suites that sleep from
six to ten people and each includes a wet bar, microwave oven,
refrigerator and dining and sitting area. We provide a
full-service entertainment resort experience to our target
customer base: families with children ranging in ages from 2 to
14 years old that live within a convenient driving distance
of our resorts. We operate under our Great Wolf Lodge and Blue
Harbor
62
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Resort brand names. Our resorts are open year-round and provide
a consistent and comfortable environment where our guests can
enjoy our various amenities and activities.
We provide our guests with a self-contained vacation experience
and focus on capturing a significant portion of their total
vacation spending. We earn revenues through the sale of rooms,
which includes admission to our indoor waterpark, and other
revenue-generating resort amenities. Each of our resorts
features a combination of the following revenue-generating
amenities: themed restaurants, an ice cream shop and
confectionery, full-service spa, game arcade, gift shop and
meeting space. We also generate revenues from licensing
arrangements, management fees and other fees with respect to
properties owned in whole or in part by third parties.
The following table presents an overview of our portfolio of
operating resorts and resorts under construction. As of
December 31, 2006, we operate eight Great Wolf Lodge
resorts (our signature northwoods-themed resorts), and one Blue
Harbor Resort (a nautical-themed property).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indoor
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
|
Condo
|
|
|
Entertainment
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Opening
|
|
Suites
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Area(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Approx.
ft2)
|
|
|
Existing Resorts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Dells, WI(2)
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
1997
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
Sandusky, OH(2)
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
2001
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
Traverse City, MI
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2003
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
Kansas City, KS
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2003
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,000
|
|
Sheboygan, WI
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2004
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
Williamsburg, VA
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2005
|
|
|
301
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
Pocono Mountains, PA
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
2005
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,000
|
|
Niagara Falls, ONT(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2006
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,000
|
|
Mason, OH(5)
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,000
|
|
Resorts Under
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grapevine, TX(6)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Late 2007
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,000
|
|
Grand Mound, WA(7)
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
Early 2008
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our indoor entertainment areas generally include our indoor
waterpark, game arcade, childrens activity room and
fitness room, as well as our Aveda spa in the resorts that have
such amenities. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2005, we formed a joint venture with CNL Income Properties,
Inc. (CNL), a real estate investment trust focused on leisure
and lifestyle properties. The joint venture acquired our
Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts. CNL owns a 70% interest in
the joint venture, and we retained a 30% interest. CNL paid us
approximately $80 million for its 70% ownership interest.
We continue to operate the properties and license the Great Wolf
Lodge brand to the joint venture under
25-year
agreements, subject to earlier termination in certain situations. |
|
(3) |
|
Construction for the expansion of 104 additional guest suites,
conference center space and waterpark attractions began in May
2006. The additional waterpark attractions were completed in
December 2006. We expect to complete the additional guest suites
and conference center space in Spring 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
An affiliate of Ripley Entertainment, Inc. (Ripley), our
licensee, owns this resort. We have granted Ripley a license to
use the Great Wolf Lodge name for this resort through April
2016. We manage the resort on behalf of Ripley and also provide
central reservation services. |
63
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(5) |
|
We have entered into a joint venture agreement with a subsidiary
of CBS Corporation (CBS), to build this resort and attached
conference center. We operate the resort under our Great Wolf
Lodge brand and have a majority of the equity in the project.
CBS has a minority equity interest in the development. This
resort opened in December 2006. The conference center is
expected to be completed in March 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
We are developing a Great Wolf Lodge resort in Grapevine, Texas.
The northwoods themed, eight-story resort will provide a
comprehensive package of first-class destination lodging
amenities and activities. Construction on the resort began in
June 2006 with expected completion in late 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
We have entered into a joint venture agreement with The
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation to build this
resort. We will operate the resort under our Great Wolf Lodge
brand. The Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation will
lease the land needed for the resort to the joint venture, and
they will have a majority equity interest in the joint venture.
Construction on the resort began in October 2006 with expected
completion in early 2008. |
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Principles of Consolidation and Combination
For the period subsequent to the IPO, the accompanying
consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of
Great Wolf Resorts and our consolidated subsidiaries. Property
interests (other than property contributed by GLC) contributed
to us by the Predecessor and other investors have been accounted
for as purchases, and the excess of the purchase price over the
related historical cost bases has been allocated to the tangible
and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. For the
period prior to our IPO, the accompanying combined financial
statements include all of the accounts of the Predecessor. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in the consolidated and combined financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash
equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less when acquired. Cash is
invested with federally insured institutions that are members of
the FDIC. Cash balances with institutions may be in excess of
federally insured limits or may be invested in time deposits
that are not insured by the institution, the FDIC or any other
government agency. Cash and cash equivalents does not include
cash escrowed under loan agreements or cash restricted in
connection with deferred compensation payable.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts An allowance
for doubtful accounts is provided when it is determined that it
is more likely than not a specific account will not be
collected. Bad debt expense for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $189, $241, and $239,
respectively. Writeoffs of accounts receivable for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, were $79, $329,
and $116, respectively.
Inventory Inventories are recorded at the
lower of cost or market.
Property and Equipment Investments in
property and equipment are recorded at cost. These assets are
depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated
useful lives as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
20-40 years
|
Fixtures and equipment, including
waterpark equipment
|
|
5-15 years
|
We periodically review the estimated useful lives we have
assigned to our depreciable assets to determine whether those
useful lives are reasonable and appropriate.
Improvements and replacements are capitalized when they extend
the useful life, increase capacity or improve the efficiency of
the asset. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Construction in process includes costs such as site work,
permitting and construction related to resorts under
development. Interest is
64
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
capitalized on construction in process balances during the
construction period. Interest capitalized totaled $7,628,
$5,495, and $1,918 for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005, and 2004, respectively.
Loan Fees Loan fees are capitalized and
amortized over the term of the loan using a method that
approximates the effective interest method. Loan fees, net of
accumulated amortization, were $4,823, $3,704 and $5,174 as of
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Amortization of loan fees was $515, $3,621, and $3,084 for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively. Included in loan fee amortization for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, were $178, $2,969
and $1,283, respectively, of loan fees that were written off due
to repayment of debt.
Partially-Owned Entities We considered
Accounting Principles Based Opinion No. 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock, Statement of Position
78-9,
Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures,
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
96-16,
Investors Accounting for an Investee When the Investor has
the Majority of the Voting Interest but the Minority Partners
have Certain Approval or Veto Rights, FASB Interpretation
No. 46 (Revised 2003), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities An Interpretation of ARB
No. 51 and EITF
04-5,
Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights to
determine the method of accounting for our partially-owned
entities. In determining whether we had controlling interest in
a partially-owned entity and the requirement to consolidate the
accounts of that entity, we consider factors such as ownership
interest, board representation, management representation,
authority to make decisions, and contractual and substantive
participating rights of the partners/members as well as whether
the entity is a variable interest entity in which we will absorb
the majority of the entitys expected losses, if they
occur, or receive the majority of the expected residual returns,
if they occur, or both.
Investment in Affiliates We use the equity
method to account for our investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures, as we do not have a controlling interest. Net income
or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint ventures
based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value method
(HLBV). Under the HLBV method, net income or loss is allocated
between the partners based on the difference between each
partners claim on the net assets of the partnership at the
end and beginning of the period, after taking into account
contributions and distributions. Each partners share of
the net assets of the partnership is calculated as the amount
that the partner would receive if the partnership were to
liquidate all of its assets at net book value and distribute the
resulting cash to creditors and partners in accordance with
their respective priorities.
Other Intangible Assets Our other intangible
assets consist of the value of our Great Wolf Lodge brand name.
This intangible asset has an indefinite useful life. In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, we do not amortize this intangible, but instead
test it for possible impairment at least annually by comparing
the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying amount.
Our assessment during the year ended December 31, 2006
determined that no such impairment had occurred. Future adverse
changes in the hospitality and lodging industry, market
conditions or poor operating results of the underlying real
estate assets could result in future losses or the inability to
recover the carrying value of these intangibles.
Goodwill The excess of the purchase price of
entities that are considered to be purchases of businesses over
the estimated fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible
assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. We recorded goodwill in
connection with the Formation Transactions.
In connection with SFAS No. 142, we are required to
assess goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if
circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. We assess
goodwill for such impairment by comparing the carrying value of
our reporting units to their fair values. We determine our
reporting units fair value using a discounted cash flow
model. Our assessment during the year ended December 31,
2006 determined that an impairment had occurred at two of our
resorts due to economic and market conditions,
65
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
resulting in a charge of $50,975. Future adverse changes in the
hospitality and lodging industry, market conditions or poor
operating results of the underlying real estate assets could
result in future losses or the inability to recover the carrying
value of the remaining goodwill.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets When
circumstances, such as adverse market conditions, indicate that
the carrying value of a long lived asset may be
impaired, we perform an analysis to review the recoverability of
the assets carrying value. We make estimates of the
undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges) from the
expected future operations of the asset. These estimates
consider factors such as expected future operating income,
operating trends and prospects, as well as the effects of
demand, competition and other factors. If the analysis indicates
that the carrying value is not recoverable from future cash
flows, an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the
carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. Any impairment
losses are recorded as operating expenses, which reduce net
income. We had no impairment losses in any of the periods
presented.
Revenue Recognition We earn revenues from our
resort operations, management of resorts and other related
services, and sales of condominiums. The Predecessor also earned
revenue from its hotel operations and hotel and multifamily
management and development services.
We recognize revenue from rooms, food and beverage, and other
operating departments at the resorts as earned at the time of
sale or rendering of service. Cash received in advance of the
sale or rendering of services is recorded as advance deposits on
the consolidated balance sheets. We recognize management and
related fees as they are contractually earned. We recognize
development fees as earned under the completed contract method
for projects with a short duration, and the percentage of
completion method (based on
contract-to-date
costs incurred compared to total expected costs) for longer-term
projects. We recognize revenue from the sale of real estate
assets in accordance with SFAS No. 66,
Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.
Sales of Real Estate Assets
SFAS No. 66 requires an entity to recognize gains on
sales of real estate only when a sale is consummated, the
buyers initial and continuing investments are adequate to
demonstrate a commitment to pay, and risks and rewards of
ownership are transferred to the buyer. We account for gains and
losses on sales of real estate in accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 66. In the period from January 1,
2004 through December 20, 2004, the Predecessor recognized
a gain on sale of real estate of $1,072 from the sale of land
owned in Ontario, Canada and $581 from the sale of land in
Beckley, West Virginia. In 2005, we recorded revenues and cost
of sales of $25,862 and $16,780, respectively, related to the
sale of condominiums. We also recorded a loss of $26,161 on the
sale of two of our resorts to a joint venture. In 2006 we
recorded an additional loss of $953 related to our 2005 sale of
two of our resorts to a joint venture.
Other Revenue and Other Expenses From Managed
Properties We employ the staff at our managed
properties. Under our management agreements, the resort owners
reimburse us for payroll, benefits and certain other costs
related to the operations of the managed properties. EITF
01-14
Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements
Received for
Out-of-Pocket
Expenses Incurred, establishes standards for accounting
for reimbursable expenses in our income statement. Under this
pronouncement, the reimbursement of payroll, benefits and costs
is recorded as revenue on our statements of operations, with a
corresponding expense recorded as other expenses from
managed properties.
Minority Interest We record the non-owned
equity interests of our consolidated subsidiaries as minority
interests on our consolidated balance sheets. The minority
ownership interest of our earnings or loss, net of tax, is
classified as Minority interests in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
Income Taxes The Predecessor was
comprised of a Subchapter S Corporation and limited
liability companies. Under applicable federal and state income
tax rules, the net income or loss of each of these entities was
reportable in the income tax returns of the stockholders,
partners and members of the entities. Accordingly, no income tax
provision was included in the accompanying combined financial
statements.
66
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Subsequent to the IPO, we and our subsidiaries file a
consolidated federal income tax return and separate state income
tax returns. Under the liability method prescribed by
SFAS 109, deferred income taxes are established for
deferred for all temporary differences between the book and tax
bases of assets and liabilities using the tax rates scheduled by
law to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse.
Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that
realization of such benefits is more likely than not. A
valuation allowance is recorded for those benefits that do not
meet this criterion.
Advertising Advertising costs are expensed as
incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $10,297, $7,329, and
$3,283, respectively.
IPO Costs Underwriting commissions and other
costs directly related to sale of our common stock in the IPO
are reflected as a reduction of additional
paid-in-capital.
Included in selling, general and administrative expenses are
$863 and $5,550 of other expenses incurred as a result of the
IPO transactions, for the period January 1, 2004 through
December 20, 2004 and December 21, 2004 through
December 31, 2004, respectively. These expenses include a
debt prepayment penalty, write-offs of loan fees related to debt
repaid or refinanced in conjunction with the IPO and bonuses due
to certain executives, pursuant to their employment
arrangements, as a result of the IPO.
Segments We are organized into a single
operating division. Within that operating division, we have
three reportable segments in 2006: resort ownership/operation,
resort third-party management and condominium sales. The resort
ownership/operation segment derives its revenues from the
ownership/operation of our consolidated owned resorts; the
resort third-party management segment derives its revenue from
management, license and other related fees from unconsolidated
managed resorts and from other revenues recorded in accordance
with EITF
01-14; and
the condominium sales segment derives its revenues from sales of
condominium units to third-part owners. We evaluate the
performance of each segment based on earnings before interest,
income taxes, and depreciation and amortization (EBITDA),
excluding impairment loss, minority interests and equity in
earnings of unconsolidated affiliates.
The following summarizes significant financial information
regarding our segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resort
|
|
|
Resort Third-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals per
|
|
|
|
Ownership/
|
|
|
Party
|
|
|
Condominium
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Statements
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
130,912
|
|
|
$
|
17,736
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
148,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA, excluding certain items
|
|
|
26,729
|
|
|
|
5,817
|
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(8,989
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,187
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(25,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
(25,903
|
)
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
(50,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,975
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,064
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes, minority
interests, and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(57,755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to long-lived assets
|
|
|
119,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
$
|
120,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
520,528
|
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,951
|
|
|
$
|
683,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resort
|
|
|
Resort Third-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership/
|
|
|
Party
|
|
|
Condominium
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
110,053
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
25,862
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA, excluding certain items
|
|
|
(9,353
|
)
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
9,082
|
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
$
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(24,576
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,672
|
)
|
|
|
(26,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes, minority
interests, and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(31,446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to long-lived assets
|
|
|
124,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
124,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
479,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,356
|
|
|
$
|
605,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Other items in the table above represent corporate-level
activities that do not constitute a reportable segment. Total
assets at the corporate level primarily consist of cash, our
investment in affiliates, and intangibles. Goodwill is included
in our resort ownership/operation segment.
For the year ended December 31, 2004 we viewed our
operations as principally one segment (resort
ownership/operation) and the financial information disclosed for
2004 represents all of the financial information related to that
segment.
Use of Estimates To prepare financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, we must make estimates
and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the
reported amounts in the financial statements, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reclassifications Certain 2005 amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation.
New Accounting Pronouncements In July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48) Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes which prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement process for recording in the financial statements
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on the
derecognition, classification, accounting in interim periods and
disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions. The
accounting provisions of FIN 48 will be effective for us
beginning January 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating the
impact of adoption of this statement.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently
evaluating the impact of the adoption of this statement.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits
companies to choose to measure many financial assets
68
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected are
reported in earnings at each reporting date. SFAS 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. The provisions of this statement are required to be
applied prospectively. We are currently assessing the impact of
SFAS 159 on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
INVESTMENT
IN AFFILIATES
|
CNL
Joint Venture
In October 2005, we formed a joint venture with CNL Income
Properties, Inc. (CNL), a real estate investment trust focused
on leisure and lifestyle properties. The joint venture acquired
two of our wholly-owned properties Great Wolf
Lodge Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, and Great Wolf
Lodge Sandusky, Ohio. CNL paid us $80,150 to
purchase a 70% interest in the joint venture; we own the
remaining 30% of the joint venture. We continue to manage the
properties and license the Great Wolf Lodge brand to the joint
venture under
25-year
agreements.
In March 2006, our joint venture with CNL entered into a loan
agreement and borrowed $63,000. The loan is secured by the joint
ventures resorts. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement,
the joint venture distributed to us 30% of the net loan
proceeds, or approximately $18,600.
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 66, upon
formation of the joint venture we reclassified 30% of the
historical carrying value of the two properties net assets
to our investment in affiliate balance. We wrote off the
remaining 70% of the historical carrying value of the
properties net assets in determining the loss on sale. The
carrying value of our investment in this joint venture was
$25,028 and $43,207 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Summary financial data for our investment in affiliate as of and
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
116,973
|
|
|
$
|
120,884
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
69,578
|
|
|
$
|
9,284
|
|
Operating data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
37,428
|
|
|
$
|
6,550
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
$
|
(33,630
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,600
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,655
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,029
|
)
|
Under the joint venture formation agreement, we may receive an
earn-out of up to $3,000 for each of the two resorts at the end
of 2008, based on the
2007/2008
performance of the resorts. The earn-out is a possible source of
future earnings for us, which represents a gain contingency. It
is not certain that we will realize this future revenue.
Accordingly, in accordance with SFAS 5, Accounting
for Contingencies, we have not recorded the gain
contingency.
We agreed to complete construction of a waterpark expansion at
our Wisconsin Dells resort and complete some roof repairs at our
Sandusky resort. A portion of the proceeds from the joint
venture transaction was escrowed to meet these obligations. We
have a receivable from the joint venture of $12,825 as of
December 31, 2005 related to the escrowed funds; this
amount is recorded as accounts receivable-affiliates. We also
have a liability of $3,576 for the construction and repairs as
of December 31, 2005; this amount is recorded as accrued
expenses-affiliates. During 2006, $10,724 of the escrow was used
to complete the waterpark expansion and the balance of $2,101
was paid to us.
69
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At December 31, 2006, we have a receivable from the joint
venture of $1,223 that relates primarily to license fees; this
amount is recorded as accounts receivable-affiliates. We also
have a liability of $443 for construction and repairs; this
amount is recorded as accrued expenses-affiliates.
Grand
Mount Joint Venture
In June 2005, we entered into a joint venture with The
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation (the Tribe) to
develop a Great Wolf Lodge resort and conference center on a
39-acre land
parcel in Grand Mound, Washington. We will operate the resort
under the Great Wolf Lodge brand, The Confederated Tribes of the
Chehalis Reservation will contribute the land needed for the
resort, and both parties will maintain equity positions in the
joint venture. Construction on the resort began in October 2006.
At December 31, 2006, we have a receivable from the Tribe
of $1,000 that relates to development fees; this amount is
recorded as accounts receivable-affiliates.
|
|
4.
|
PURCHASE
ACCOUNTING IN CONNECTION WITH THE IPO
|
The IPO closed on December 20, 2004. In conjunction with
the Formation Transactions completed on that date, we issued a
total of 14,032,896 shares of our common stock and paid
cash of approximately $97,600 to buy out certain investors in
the resort-owning entities.
For the five resort-owning entities with operating resorts at
the time of the Formation Transactions, we recorded the
Formation Transactions by applying the purchase method of
accounting in connection with our acquisition of those five
resort-owning entities. In conjunction with purchase accounting
we:
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded property and equipment, other assets, debt and other
liabilities at their preliminarily estimated fair values;
|
|
|
|
Recorded a deferred tax liability resulting from the difference
between the preliminarily estimated fair values and the tax
bases of assets acquired from the five resort-owning entities.
We recorded this liability at our anticipated effective tax rate
of 40%;
|
|
|
|
Eliminated mandatorily redeemable interests of the Predecessor
due to the conversion of those ownership interests to our common
stock in conjunction with the Formation Transactions; and
|
|
|
|
Recorded as goodwill the excess of consideration in the purchase
transaction over the estimated fair value of net tangible and
intangible assets acquired from the five resort-owning entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Great Wolf Resorts common
stock issued
|
|
$
|
80,840
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
73,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of acquisition
|
|
|
153,882
|
|
Fair value of debt assumed
|
|
|
181,415
|
|
Fair value of property and
equipment acquired
|
|
|
(189,427
|
)
|
Fair value of intangible assets
|
|
|
(10,296
|
)
|
Deferred tax liability recorded
|
|
|
11,297
|
|
Fair value of other assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
8,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
155,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of this process, we had $155,196 of goodwill at
December 31, 2004, all of which related to the application
of purchase accounting in conjunction with the Formation
Transactions. Some of the values and amounts used in the initial
application of purchase accounting for our consolidated balance
sheet were based on preliminary estimates and assumptions. In
2005, we refined these estimates and assumptions.
70
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded
adjustments that reduced goodwill by $62,091 related to the 70%
interest we sold in our Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts in
October 2005. We also recorded adjustments to the estimated fair
market values of property and equipment acquired, resulting in
an increase to property and equipment of $28,341, an increase to
accrued expenses of $855, an increase in deferred tax liability
of $1,376, and a decrease in goodwill of $26,110.
For the two resort-owning entities with resorts under
construction at the time of the Formation Transactions, we
recorded the Formation Transactions as a purchase of assets of
those two entities. In conjunction with this accounting we:
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded all identifiable tangible and intangible assets at
their estimated fair values as of December 20, 2004;
|
|
|
|
Allocated the excess consideration paid over the estimated fair
value of the net assets acquired to all identifiable tangible
and intangible assets pro rata based on their estimated fair
values;
|
|
|
|
Recorded a deferred tax liability resulting from the difference
between the total estimated fair values (including the excess
amount described in the previous item) and the tax bases of the
assets acquired from the two resort-owning entities. We recorded
this liability at our anticipated effective tax rate of 40%. In
the fourth quarter of 2005, we recorded adjustments to finalize
the deferred tax liabilities, resulting in a decrease in
deferred tax liabilities of $6,086, a decrease in property and
equipment acquired of $10,801, and an increase in intangible
assets of $4,715.
|
|
|
5.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
38,058
|
|
|
$
|
38,735
|
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
178,464
|
|
|
|
151,056
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
243,991
|
|
|
|
167,691
|
|
Construction in process
|
|
|
71,848
|
|
|
|
45,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532,361
|
|
|
|
402,506
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(42,393
|
)
|
|
|
(17,115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
489,968
|
|
|
$
|
385,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $25,657, $22,627, and $11,920 for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
71
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traverse City/Kansas City mortgage
loan
|
|
$
|
72,801
|
|
|
$
|
73,979
|
|
Sheboygan mortgage loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,939
|
|
Mason construction loan
|
|
|
55,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pocono Mountains mortgage loan
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
51,550
|
|
|
|
51,550
|
|
Other Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Sheboygan bonds
|
|
|
8,383
|
|
|
|
8,288
|
|
City of Sheboygan loan
|
|
|
3,863
|
|
|
|
4,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289,389
|
|
|
|
168,328
|
|
Less current portion of long-term
debt
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
287,957
|
|
|
$
|
166,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traverse City/Kansas City Mortgage Loan This
loan is secured by our Traverse City and Kansas City resorts.
The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.96%, is subject to
a 25-year
principal amortization schedule, and matures in January 2015.
The loan has customary financial and operating debt compliance
covenants, including a minimum debt service coverage ratio,
representing the combined EBITDA (adjusted for non-recurring
items, unusual items, infrequent items and asset impairment
charges) minus 4% of the revenues of two resorts divided by
their combined annual interest expense and principal
amortization. The loan also has customary prohibitions on our
ability to prepay the loan prior to maturity. We were in
compliance with all covenants under this loan at
December 31, 2006.
Sheboygan Mortgage Loan This loan was repaid
on December 13, 2006.
Mason Construction Loan In December 2005 we
closed on a $76,800 loan to construct the Great Wolf Lodge in
Mason, Ohio. The loan is secured by a first mortgage on the
Mason, Ohio property and matures in December 2008. The loan also
has two one-year extensions after the initial
3-year term
available at our option. The lenders have a construction and
debt service guaranty from us. In conjunction with the debt
service guaranty, we must maintain a maximum ratio of long-term
debt minus cash divided by consolidated trailing twelve month
adjusted EBITDA of 6.50x and a minimum tangible net worth of
$200,000 or greater. The construction guaranty expires at the
opening date of the resort and the debt service guaranty expires
once the resort achieves a trailing cash flow threshold. The
loan bears interest at a floating rate of 30 day LIBOR plus
a spread of 265 basis points (total rate of 7.98% as of
December 31, 2006). The loan is interest only during the
initial three-year term and then is subject to a
25-year
amortization schedule in the extension years. The loan has
customary covenants associated with an individual mortgaged
property. There are no prohibitions or fees associated with the
repayment of the loan principal. We were in compliance with all
covenants under this loan at December 31, 2006.
Pocono Mountains Mortgage Loan In December
2006 we closed on a $97,000 first mortgage loan secured by our
Pocono Mountains resort. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate
of 6.10% and matures January 1, 2017. The loan is interest
only for the initial
18-month
period and thereafter is subject to a
72
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
30-year
principal amortization schedule. The loan has customary
covenants associated with an individual mortgaged property. The
loan also has customary prohibitions on our ability to prepay
the loan prior to maturity. We were in compliance with all
covenants under this loan at December 31, 2006.
Junior Subordinated Debentures In March 2005
we completed a private offering of $50,000 of trust preferred
securities (TPS) through Great Wolf Capital Trust I (the
Trust), a Delaware statutory trust which is our subsidiary. The
securities pay holders cumulative cash distributions at an
annual rate which is fixed at 7.80% through March 2015 and then
floats at LIBOR + 310 basis points thereafter. The
securities mature in March 2035 and are callable at no premium
after March 2010. In addition, we invested $1,500 in the
Trusts common securities, representing 3% of the total
capitalization of the Trust.
The Trust used the proceeds of the offering and our investment
to purchase from us $51,550 of our junior subordinated
debentures with payment terms that mirror the distribution terms
of the trust securities. The costs of the trust preferred
offering totaled $1,600, including $1,500 of underwriting
commissions and expenses and $100 of costs incurred directly by
the Trust. The Trust paid these costs utilizing an investment
from us. These costs are being amortized over a
30-year
period. The proceeds from our debenture sale, net of the costs
of the trust preferred offering and our investment in the Trust,
were $48,400. We used the net proceeds to retire the Pocono
Mountains construction loan.
As a result of the issuance of FASB Interpretation No. 46R,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities and the
accounting professions application of the guidance
provided by the FASB, issue trusts, like the Trust, are
generally variable interest entities. We have determined that we
are not the primary beneficiary under the Trust, and accordingly
we do not include the financial statements of the Trust in our
consolidated financial statements.
Based on the foregoing accounting authority, our consolidated
financial statements present the debentures issued to the Trust
as long-term debt. Our investment in the Trust is accounted as a
cost investment and is included in other assets. For financial
reporting purposes, we record interest expense on the
corresponding debentures in our consolidated statements of
operations.
City of Sheboygan Bonds The City of Sheboygan
(the City) bonds represent the face amount of bond anticipation
notes (BANs) issued by the City in November 2003 in conjunction
with the construction of the Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan,
Wisconsin. In accordance with the provisions of EITF Issue
No. 91-10,
we have recognized as a liability the obligations for the BANs.
The notes bear interest at an annual rate of 3.95% and mature in
2008. The notes are not a general obligation of the City and are
payable from (a) the proceeds of bond anticipation notes or
other funds appropriated by the City for the payment of interest
on the BANs and (b) the proceeds to be delivered from the
issuance and sale of securities by the City. We have an
obligation to fund payment of these BANs. Our obligation to fund
repayment of the notes will be satisfied by certain minimum
guaranteed amounts of room tax payments to be made by the Blue
Harbor Resort through 2028.
City of Sheboygan Loan The City of Sheboygan
loan amount represents a loan made by the City in 2004 in
conjunction with the construction of the Blue Harbor Resort in
Sheboygan, Wisconsin. The loan is noninterest bearing and
matures in 2018. Our obligation to repay the loan will be
satisfied by certain minimum guaranteed amounts of real and
personal property tax payments to be made by the Blue Harbor
Resort through 2018.
73
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future Maturities Future principal
requirements on long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,764
|
|
2010
|
|
|
58,749
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,165
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
221,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
289,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
As of December 31, 2006, we estimate the total fair value
of our long-term debt to be $8,377 more than its total carrying
value due to the terms of the existing debt being different than
those terms currently available to us for indebtedness with
similar risks and remaining maturities.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, other
current assets, escrows and accounts payable and accrued
expenses approximate fair value because of the short-term nature
of these instruments.
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,768
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,768
|
)
|
State and local
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
|
$
|
(9,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,938
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
(6,566
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,511
|
)
|
State and local
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(938
|
)
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
(7,504
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,309
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from December 21, 2004
to December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,243
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,243
|
)
|
State and local
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,563
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The differences between the statutory Federal income tax rate
and the effective income tax rate reflected in our consolidated
statements of operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Federal statutory income tax
benefit
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
State income taxes, net of Federal
income taxes
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
Nondeductible goodwill
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(40.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities
at December 31, 2006 and 2005 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
$
|
(34,342
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39,931
|
)
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
8,740
|
|
|
|
3,879
|
|
Investment in affiliates
|
|
|
(1,314
|
)
|
|
|
(1,320
|
)
|
Loan fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
|
(764
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
8,546
|
|
|
|
11,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(16,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our 2006 net deferred tax liability consisted of a current
deferred tax liability of $454 included in accrued expenses and
a long-term deferred tax liability of $15,846 in the
consolidated balance sheet.
We consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
the generation of future taxable income during the periods in
which those temporary differences become deductible. We consider
the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected
future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making
this assessment. Based upon the scheduled reversal of deferred
tax liabilities and projections of future taxable income over
the periods in which the temporary differences are deductible,
we believe it is more likely than not that we will realize the
benefits of these deductible differences.
As of December 31, 2006, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $22,112 and $21,979 for federal
and state income tax purposes, respectively. These federal and
state carryforwards begin expiring in 2024 and 2014,
respectively. We believe all but $216 of the net operating loss
carryforwards will be realized; therefore we have established a
valuation as of December 31, 2006 of $216. The valuation
allowance is included on the balance sheet in deferred tax
liability. There was no valuation allowance on the deferred tax
assets as of December 31, 2005.
|
|
9.
|
RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
We have the following related-party transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
We and the Predecessor previously used an aircraft owned by an
entity owned by several of our former members of senior
management. The entity that owns the aircraft also had one
employee for whom
|
75
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor provided payroll and benefit services, the costs of
which were reimbursed by the entity. This relationship ended in
2005. Payments of $43, and $235 were made in the years ended
December 31, 2005, and 2004, respectively, for the lease of
the aircraft for company business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A member of our senior management owned a 25% interest in the
entity that leases space at the Great Wolf Lodge in Wisconsin
Dells and operates the spa located within that resort. In 2005,
the member of our senior management divested their ownership
interest in this entity. That entity made payments of $38 and
$44 to the resort for the years ended December 31, 2005,
and 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
|
We provided administrative services for a non-resort hotel
entity and a multifamily housing entity owned by certain current
and former members of our senior management. This relationship
ended in 2005. Amounts charged to these entities in 2005 were
$645; no amounts were charged in 2004.
|
|
|
|
We provided administrative services for a development project
owned by certain current and former members of our senior
management. Amounts charged to this entity in 2005 were $18; no
amounts were charged in 2006 and 2004.
|
|
|
10.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Legal Matters We are involved in litigation
from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. We do
not believe that the outcome of any such pending or threatened
litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition or results of operations. However, as is inherent in
legal proceedings where issues may be decided by finders of
fact, there is a risk that unpredictable decision adverse to the
company could be reached.
Letters of Credit In connection with the
construction of our Sheboygan, Wisconsin resort, we have
supplied a $2,000 letter of credit in favor of the City of
Sheboygan. The letter of credit expires on December 31,
2007. There have been no draws on this letter of credit. We have
made a $2,000 deposit with a bank as collateral for this letter
of credit. The deposit is considered restricted cash and is
included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2006 and 2005.
In connection with the construction of our Mason, Ohio resort,
we have supplied a $1,270 letter of credit as a guaranty to the
City of Mason that we will make all necessary improvements to
the roads and traffic signals around the property. The letter of
credit will expire when the city formally approves completion of
the road improvements. We have made a $1,270 deposit with a bank
as collateral for this letter of credit. The deposit is
considered restricted cash and is included in other assets on
the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 and
2005.
Guarantees Based on certain criteria, FASB
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees requires a
guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a
liability for that guarantee. The objective of the initial
measurement of the liability is the fair value of the guarantee
at its inception. In connection with the construction of our
Sheboygan, Wisconsin resort, we entered into agreements with the
City of Sheboygan and The Redevelopment Authority of the City of
Sheboygan, Wisconsin (collectively, the City) whereby the City
funded certain costs of construction. The City funded $4,000
toward the construction of the resort and related public
improvements and $8,200 toward construction of a convention
center connected to the resort.
In exchange for the $4,000 funding, we guaranteed real and
personal property tax payments over a fourteen-year period
totaling $16,400. This obligation is also guaranteed by three of
our former members of senior management. The guarantee was
entered into on July 30, 2003.
In exchange for the $8,200 funding, we entered into a lease for
the convention center with the City. The initial term of the
lease is
251/2 years
with 15,
5-year
renewal options. Under the lease, we will satisfy
76
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
repayment of the $8,200 funding by making guaranteed room tax
payments totaling $25,944 over the initial term of the lease.
This obligation is also guaranteed by three of our former
members of senior management. This guarantee was also entered
into on July 30, 2003.
The debt related to the $4,000 and $8,200 fundings is included
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and we have not
recorded any liability related to the guarantees on those
fundings.
Commitments We lease office space, storage
space and office equipment under various operating leases. Most
of the leases include renewal options. Future minimum payments
on these operating leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
2008
|
|
|
754
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005,
and 2004 was not significant.
We also have commitments on contracts to build our resorts under
construction. Commitments on these contracts total $79,867 for
periods subsequent to December 31, 2006.
We maintain a 401(k) profit sharing plan for our employees.
Eligibility for participation in the plan is based on an
employee meeting certain minimum age and service requirements.
Participants may make voluntary, pre-tax contributions through
salary deferrals to the plan. Employer matching contributions
are discretionary and are based on a percentage of employee
contributions. Our contributions to the plan were $231, $219,
and $193 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and
2004, respectively.
General The Predecessor was comprised of a
Subchapter S Corporation and limited liability companies.
As a result, equity for the Predecessor included par value and
retained earnings (for the Subchapter S Corporation) and
members equity (for the limited liability companies). The
entities included in the Predecessors combined historical
financial statements conducted business under various operating
agreements. These agreements governed the various classes of
members, distribution preferences, payment of dividends,
liquidation preferences and voting rights.
Members Equity of Combined Entities The
Predecessors combined financial statements included
certain entities that were under common management by GLC.
Members equity of combined entities on the Statements of
Equity represents the portion of owners equity of those
combined entities not owned by GLC.
Treasury Stock The Predecessor accounted for
repurchases of treasury shares under the cost method.
Mandatorily Redeemable
Ownership Interests In accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 150, the Predecessor identified
the following items as meeting the criteria of a mandatorily
redeemable financial instrument:
|
|
|
|
|
Class A and Class B shares of
GLC. GLC was obligated to redeem in cash the A
Shares and B Shares of a shareholder who died or incurred
certain triggering events (as defined in the Term Sheet of Buy
|
77
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
and Sell Provisions for Shares in The Great Lakes Companies,
Inc.). The redemption price was calculated by a formula using
GLCs net operating income and a multiple based on the type
of triggering event, as described in the Term Sheet. Both the A
Shares and the B shares contained restrictions on transfers and
sales by the stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Units of Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City,
LLC. In accordance with provisions in the Kansas
City LLC Agreement, the LLC was required to redeem in cash the
Class B Units no later than the fifth anniversary date of
the operating commencement date of the Kansas City resort. The
redemption price was based on the greater of fair value or an
internal rate of return.
|
The rights of GLCs shareholders and Great Wolf Lodge of
Kansas Citys Class B unitholders to require the
Predecessor to redeem these equity instruments represented
embedded derivative instruments. The Predecessor recorded these
derivative instruments at their estimated fair values at each of
the reporting dates in the Predecessors combined balance
sheets. The fair values of the derivative instruments were
included in mandatorily redeemable ownership interests. For each
period presented, the Predecessor marked the underlying
derivative to its estimated fair value. The change in the
estimated fair value between periods was included in interest on
mandatorily redeemable ownership interests in the combined
statements of operations.
Deferred Compensation In 2004, we established
a deferred compensation plan for certain of our executives. The
plan allows for contributions by both the participants and us.
Our employer matching contribution for the plan was $74, $55 and
$0 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Earnings per Share We calculate our basic
earnings per common share by dividing net income (loss)
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number
of shares of common stock outstanding. Our diluted earnings per
common share assumes the issuance of common stock for all
potentially dilutive stock equivalents outstanding. In periods
in which we incur a net loss, we exclude potentially dilutive
stock equivalents from the computation of diluted weighted
average shares outstanding, as the effect of those potentially
dilutive items is anti-dilutive. We had 1,064,500, 1,471,834 and
1,658,500 total options outstanding at December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
The trust that holds the assets to pay obligations under our
deferred compensation plan has 129,412 shares of our common
stock. In accordance with the provisions of EITF Issue
No. 97-14,
we treat those shares of common stock as treasury stock for
purposes of our earnings per share computations and therefore we
exclude them from our basic and diluted earnings per share
calculations. Basic and diluted earnings per common share are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common
shares
|
|
$
|
(49,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,842
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding basic and diluted
|
|
|
30,299,647
|
|
|
|
30,134,146
|
|
|
|
30,132,896
|
|
Net loss per share
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
13.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards 123(R), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123(R)), using the modified prospective
application transition method. Before we adopted
SFAS 123(R), we accounted for share-based compensation in
accordance with Accounting Principles Board
78
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. Other than for the expense related to our
deferred compensation shares and our non-vested shares, no
share-based employee compensation cost has been reflected in net
income prior to January 1, 2006.
We recognized $3,559, $(1,554), and $2,891, net of estimated
forfeitures, in share-based compensation expense (revenue) for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. The total income tax benefit (expense) recognized
related to share-based compensation was $1,424 and $(621) for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
We recognize compensation expense on grants of share-based
compensation awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period of each award recipient. As of December 31,
2006, total unrecognized compensation cost related to
share-based compensation awards was $4,434, which we expect to
recognize over a weighted average period of approximately
2.6 years.
The Great Wolf Resorts 2004 Incentive Stock Plan (the Plan)
authorizes us to grant up to 3,380,520 options, stock
appreciation rights or shares of our common stock to employees
and directors. At December 31, 2006, there were
1,958,927 shares available for future grants under the Plan.
We anticipate having to issue new shares of our common stock for
stock option exercises.
Stock
Options
We have granted non-qualified stock options to purchase our
common stock under the Plan at prices equal to the fair market
value of the common stock on the grant dates. The exercise price
for certain options granted under the plans may be paid in cash,
shares of common stock or a combination of cash and shares.
Stock options expire ten years from the grant date and vest
ratably over three years.
We recorded stock option expense of $1,776 for the years ended
December 31, 2006. The per share weighted average fair
value of stock options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, was $6.00, $9.38 and
$4.82, respectively. We granted 15,000 and 184,000 stock options
during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. We estimated the fair value of each stock option
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model and
the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average, risk free
interest rate
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
|
|
3.65
|
%
|
|
|
3.65
|
%
|
Weighted average, expected life of
option
|
|
|
6.0 years
|
|
|
|
6.0 years
|
|
|
|
5.0 years
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
39.83
|
%
|
|
|
40.00
|
%
|
|
|
23.00
|
%
|
We used an expected dividend yield of 0% as we do not currently
pay a dividend and do not contemplate paying a dividend in the
foreseeable future. The weighted average, risk free interest
rate is based on the U.S. Treasury note rate at the
beginning of the period. The weighted average expected life of
our options is based on the simplified calculation allowed under
SFAS 123(R). Due to our formation in December 2004, our
expected stock price volatility is estimated using daily returns
data for the five-year period ending on the grant date for a
group of peer companies.
79
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of stock option activity during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Number of shares under option:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted on December 20, 2004
|
|
|
1,656,300
|
|
|
$
|
17.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2004
|
|
|
1,656,300
|
|
|
$
|
17.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
184,000
|
|
|
$
|
21.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised Forfeited
|
|
|
(368,466
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
1,471,834
|
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
13.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(422,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
1,064,500
|
|
|
$
|
17.55
|
|
|
|
8.05 years
|
|
Exercisable at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
653,182
|
|
|
$
|
17.33
|
|
|
|
8.00 years
|
|
The intrinsic value of our outstanding stock options and
exercisable stock options was $12 and $0, respectively, at
December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2005, all of our
option grant prices were above our stock price. Therefore there
was no intrinsic value for our outstanding or exercisable shares
at December 31, 2005.
Market
Condition Share Awards
Certain officers and key employees are eligible to receive
shares of our common stock in payment of market condition share
awards granted to them in accordance with the terms thereof.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, 81,820 market
condition share awards were granted. Grantees of market
condition shares were eligible to receive shares of our common
stock based on our common stocks performance in calendar
year 2006 relative to a small cap stock index, as designated by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Based on
our common stock performance in 2006, employees earned and were
issued 81,820 market condition shares in February 2007. No
market condition share awards were outstanding as of
December 31, 2005.
We recorded share based expense of $482 for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The per share fair value of market
condition shares granted during the year ended December 31,
2006 was $5.76 and was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation
and the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average, risk free
interest rate
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
(peer group of companies)
|
|
|
31.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
(small-cap stock index)
|
|
|
17.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We used an expected dividend yield of 0% as we do not currently
pay a dividend and do not contemplate paying a dividend in the
foreseeable future. The weighted average, risk free interest
rate is based on the one-year T-bill rate. Our expected stock
price volatility was estimated using daily returns data for the
three-year period ending on the grant date for peer group
companies. The expected stock price volatility for the small cap
stock index was estimated using three-year return averages.
80
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Performance
Share Awards
Certain officers and key employees are eligible to receive
shares of our common stock in payment of performance share
awards granted to them in accordance with the terms thereof.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, 27,273 performance
share awards were granted. Grantees of performance shares were
eligible to receive shares of our common stock based on the
achievement of certain individual and departmental performance
criteria in 2006. We recorded share based compensation expense
of $310 for the year ended December 31, 2006. The per share
fair value of performance shares granted during the year ended
December 31, 2006 was $11.03, which represents the fair
value of our common stock on the grant date. Based on our
achievement of certain individual and departmental performance
goals, employees earned and were issued 17,949 performance
shares in February 2007. No performance share awards were
outstanding as of December 31, 2005.
Deferred
Compensation Awards
Pursuant to their employment arrangements, certain executives
received bonuses upon completion of the IPO. Executives
receiving bonus payments totaling $2,200 elected to defer those
payments pursuant to our deferred compensation plan. To satisfy
this obligation, we contributed 129,412 shares of our
common stock to the trust that holds the assets to pay
obligations under our deferred compensation plan. The fair value
of that stock at the date of contribution was $2,200. In
accordance with the provisions of EITF Issue
No. 97-14,
Accounting for Deferred Compensation Arrangements Where
Amounts Earned Are Held in a Rabbi Trust and Invested, we
have recorded the fair value of the shares of common stock, at
the date the shares were contributed to the trust, as a
reduction of our stockholders equity. Also, as prescribed
by EITF Issue
No. 97-14,
we account for the change in fair value of the shares held in
the trust as a charge to compensation cost. We recorded share
based compensation expense (revenue) of $472 and $(1,557), and
$2,891 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
Non-vested
Shares
We have granted non-vested shares to certain employees and our
directors. Shares vest between three and five years. We valued
the non-vested shares at the closing market value of our common
stock on the date of grant.
A summary of non-vested shares activity for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Non-vested shares balance at
January 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares balance at
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
236,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares balance at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.08
|
|
|
$
|
593
|
|
81
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We recorded share based expense of $519 and $3 for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Prior
Year Pro Forma Expense
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
earnings per share as if the fair value-based method provided by
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, had been applied for all outstanding and
unvested awards for periods prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123(R):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 21, 2004
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported
|
|
$
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,842
|
)
|
Compensation expense,
SFAS 123 fair value method, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,364
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(25,777
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per
share basic
|
|
$
|
(0.86
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
Pro forma net loss per
share diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.86
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
Actual net loss per
share basic
|
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
Actual net loss per
share diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
14.
|
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
|
As of January 1, 2004, the Predecessor had two hotels
classified as held for sale. These hotels were sold in the
period from January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004,
resulting in a gain of $4,779. Operating results and the gain on
disposition for the hotels classified as held for sale are
included in income from discontinued operations in the combined
statements of operations for the period January 1, 2004
through December 20, 2004.
On December 20, 2004, in connection with the Formation
Transactions, the Predecessor spun-off its non-resort interests
to the existing shareholders of GLC. As a result, we have
included the operations of the spun-off entities in discontinued
operations for all Predecessor period presented.
Operating activity of the discontinued operations for the period
January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004 consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
4,859
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
(5,529
|
)
|
Gain on sale
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(2,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
1,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on mortgage debt related to properties sold or spun off
has been included in the operating results above.
82
GREAT
WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
The following tables sets forth certain items included in our
consolidated financial statements for each quarter of the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
37,836
|
|
|
$
|
35,827
|
|
|
$
|
40,779
|
|
|
$
|
34,206
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
3,787
|
|
|
|
(56,564
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(945
|
)
|
|
|
(1,402
|
)
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
(48,991
|
)
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(1.61
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(1.61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
26,996
|
|
|
$
|
26,032
|
|
|
$
|
59,012
|
|
|
$
|
27,375
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,116
|
)
|
|
|
(2,892
|
)
|
|
|
13,084
|
|
|
|
(33,418
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,338
|
)
|
|
|
(2,702
|
)
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
(26,384
|
)
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
(0.88
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
(0.88
|
)
|
83
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to
provide reasonable assurance that information in our reports
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified pursuant to the
SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures,
as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act, include controls and procedures designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In
designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of
the system are met.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of the end of the fourth quarter of 2006. In making this
evaluation, we considered matters discussed below relating to
internal control over financial reporting. After consideration
of the matters discussed below, we have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
December 31, 2006.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate and effective internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting refers to
the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by
our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and
procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the Company;
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our
management and directors; and
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide
absolute assurance for the prevention or detection of
misstatements within our financial reporting because of its
inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting
is a process that involves human judgment and requires diligence
and compliance to prevent errors. Internal control over
financial reporting can also be circumvented by collusion or
improper management override. Because of such limitations, there
is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. However, these inherent limitations
are known features of the financial reporting process and it is
possible to design safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate,
this risk. Our management has used the framework set forth in
the report entitled Internal Control -Integrated
Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
84
Remediation
of Material Weakness
As discussed in Item 9A of our
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, there was a material
weakness in our internal control over financial reporting
related to the collection of sufficient and reliable data
necessary to determine the deferred tax accounts and income tax
provision in circumstances where we have entered into
significant non-routine business transactions. Through the date
of this filing, we have taken steps to improve our internal
controls around our tax accounting and tax accounts
reconciliation processes, procedures and controls, including
reconciling all current and deferred tax asset and liability
accounts quarterly and reconciling the associated temporary
differences to underlying support at least annually. We believe
we have taken appropriate steps necessary to remediate this
material weakness relating to our tax accounting and tax
reconciliation processes, procedures and controls. We will
continue to monitor the effectiveness of these processes,
procedures and controls and will make any further changes we
deem appropriate.
Conclusion
Management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2006, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting was
effective.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered
public accounting firm that audited the Companys financial
statements included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
has issued an attestation report on managements assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, which is included herein.
Changes
In Internal Control
During the period covered by this annual report on
Form 10-K,
other than as noted above in this item 9A, there have been
no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that
are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control
over financial reporting.
85
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.
Madison, Wisconsin
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, that Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides reasonable
basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that the receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company, and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of the internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the
criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 of the Company and our report dated
March 7, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
financial statements (which report includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the Companys adoption of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, on January 1, 2006, as described in
Note 13).
DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 7, 2007
86
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
This information is hereby incorporated by reference from the
Proxy Statement (under the headings The Election of
Directors, The Executive Officers,
Corporate Governance and Section 16(A)
Beneficial Ownership Compliance).
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
This information is hereby incorporated by reference from the
Proxy Statement (under the headings Executive
Compensation, Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation and Compensation of
Directors).
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
This information is hereby incorporated by reference from the
Proxy Statement (under the headings Ownership Of Our
Common Stock and Equity Compensation Plan
Information).
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
This information is hereby incorporated by reference from the
Proxy Statement (under the heading Certain Relationships
And Related Transactions).
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
This information is hereby incorporated by reference from the
Proxy Statement (under the heading Relationship With
Independent Public Accountants).
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are provided under Item 8.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules are omitted since the required information is not
present in amounts sufficient to require submission to the
schedule or because the information required is included in the
financial statements and notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits.
87
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC.
John Emery
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: March 7, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ John
Emery
John
Emery
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
A. Calder
James
A. Calder
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph
Vittoria
Joseph
Vittoria
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Elan
Blutinger
Elan
Blutinger
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Randy
Churchey
Randy
Churchey
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
M. Knetter
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alissa
N. Nolan
Alissa
N. Nolan
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward
Rensi
Edward
Rensi
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Howard
Silver
Howard
Silver
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
88
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed below are incorporated herein by reference to prior SEC filings by Registrant
or are included as exhibits in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
2.1
|
|
Form of Merger Agreement (Delaware) (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed
August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Form of Merger Agreement (Wisconsin) (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed
August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation for Great Wolf
Resorts, Inc. dated December 9, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed
August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. effective
September 12, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form S-1 filed September 18, 2006) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of the Common Stock Certificate of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed October 21, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2005, between Great
Wolf Resorts, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as
trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 18, 2005) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2005, by and
among Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Delaware trustee;
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as property trustee; Great Wolf
Resorts, Inc., as depositor; and James A. Calder, Alex G. Lombardo and J.
Michael Schroeder, as administrative trustees (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed
March 18, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
License Agreement, dated January 30, 2004, by and between The Great Lakes
Companies, Inc. and Jim Pattison Entertainment Ltd. (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1 filed September 23, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Development Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2003, among the City of
Sheboygan, Wisconsin, the Redevelopment Authority of the City of
Sheboygan, Wisconsin, The Great Lakes Companies, Inc., Blue Harbor Resort
Sheboygan, LLC, and Blue Harbor Resort Condominium, LLC (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
First Amendment to the Development Agreement, dated June 25, 2004, by and
among the City of Sheboygan, Wisconsin, the Redevelopment Authority of the
City of Sheboygan, Wisconsin, The Great Lakes Companies, Inc., Blue Harbor
Resort Sheboygan, LLC, and Blue Harbor Resort Condominium, LLC
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Tall Pines Exclusive License and Royalty Agreement, dated July 25, 2004,
between Tall Pines Development Corporation and The Great Lakes Companies,
Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed December 7, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.5+
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.5 to the Companys |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed January 21,
2005) |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Form of Noncompete Agreement, Trade Secret and Confidentiality Agreement
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed January 21, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of Officers and Directors Indemnification Agreement (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.8 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed September
23, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.9+
|
|
Form of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.10+
|
|
Form of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. 2004 Incentive Stock Plan (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed November 26, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.11+
|
|
Form of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Loan Agreement by and among Great Wolf Resorts, Inc., Citigroup Global
Markets Realty Corp. and The Travelers Insurance Company (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Companys Registration Statement
on Form S-1 filed January 21, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2005, among Great Wolf Resorts,
Inc., Great Wolf Capital Trust I, Taberna Preferred Funding I, Ltd and
Merrill Lynch International (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
1.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 18, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Venture formation and Contribution Agreement dated October 3, 2005, among
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc., Great Bear Lodge of Wisconsin Dells, LLC, Great
Bear Lodge of Sandusky, LLC, and CNL Income Partners, LP (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys current Report on
Form 8-K filed October 7, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Loan Agreement dated March 1, 2006, among CNL Income GW WI-Del, LP and CNL
Income GW Sandusky, LP, as borrowers, and NSPL, Inc., as lender
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed March 2, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Loan Agreement dated July 28, 2006, among Great Wolf Lodge of Grapevine,
LLC, as borrower, and Merrill Lynch Capital and HSH Nordbank, as lenders
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed July 31, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Loan Agreement dated December 6, 2006, between Great Wolf Lodge of the
Poconos, LLC, as borrower, and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., as
lender (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 13, 2006). |
|
|
|
21.1*
|
|
List of Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to
Rule 13a14(a) and Rule 15d14(a) |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to
Rule 13a14(a) and Rule 15d14(a) |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
32.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
+ |
|
Indicated management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an
exhibit pursuant to Item 15(c)
of Form 10-K. |