Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934
Filed
by
the Registrant x
Filed
by
a Party other than the Registrant o
Check
the
appropriate box:
|
Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
o
|
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
|
Definitive
Additional Materials
|
|
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12
|
China
Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
|
|
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
|
|
|
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
x
No
fee required.
|
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11.
|
|
1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing
fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
5)
Total fee paid:
|
|
o Fee
paid
previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
Check box if any
part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.
Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the Form
or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
1)
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
3)
Filing Party:
|
|
4)
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
CHINA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
Notice
Of Annual Meeting Of Stockholders
To
Be Held On September 5, 2007
The
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of China Automotive Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
will be held on September 5, 2007 (Wednesday) at 10 a.m. local time at Shanghai
Hall, Jin An Hilton Hotel, 250 Hua Shan Road, Shanghai, China 200040 for the
following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:
1. To elect five directors to hold office until the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.
2. To ratify the appointment of Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP as the
Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.
3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting
or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Only
stockholders of record at the close of business on July 30, 2007 will be
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, such meeting or any adjournments or
postponements thereof.
BY
ORDER
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Chen
Hanlin
Chairman
Hubei,
People's Republic of China
August
1,
2007
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
WHETHER
OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND MAIL
PROMPTLY THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE, WHICH
REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES. THIS WILL ENSURE THE
PRESENCE OF A QUORUM AT THE MEETING. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY VOTE
IN
PERSON IF YOU WISH TO DO SO EVEN IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SENT IN YOUR PROXY
CARD.
CHINA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
No.
1
Henglong Road, Yu Qiao Development Zone
Shashi
District, Jing Zhou City, Hubei Province
People's
Republic of China
(86)
716-832 9196
PROXY
STATEMENT
2007
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
China
Automotive Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) is furnishing this proxy statement and
the enclosed proxy in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board
of Directors of the Company for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to
be
held on September 5, 2007, Wednesday, at 10 a.m. local time, at Shanghai Hall,
Jin An Hilton Hotel, 250 Hua Shan Road, Shanghai, China 200040, and at any
adjournments thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). These materials will be mailed to
stockholders on or about August 1, 2007.
Only
holders of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on July 30,
2007 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Stockholders who hold shares of the Company in “street name” may vote at the
Annual Meeting only if they hold a valid proxy from their broker. As of the
Record Date, there were 23,959,702 shares of common stock outstanding.
A
majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting must be present in person or by proxy in order for there to
be a
quorum at the meeting. Stockholders of record who are present at the meeting
in
person or by proxy and who abstain from voting, including brokers holding
customers’ shares of record who cause abstentions to be recorded at the meeting,
will be included in the number of stockholders present at the meeting for
purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.
Each
stockholder of record is entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting for each
share of common stock held by such stockholder on the Record Date. Stockholders
do not have cumulative voting rights. Stockholders may vote their shares by
using the proxy card enclosed with this proxy statement. All proxy cards
received by the Company, which are properly signed and have not been revoked
will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained in the proxy cards.
If a signed proxy card is received which does not specify a vote or an
abstention, the shares represented by that proxy card will be voted for the
nominees to the Board of Directors listed on the proxy card and in this proxy
statement, and for the ratification of the appointment of Schwartz Levitsky
Feldman LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2007. The Company is not aware, as of the date hereof, of any
matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting other than those stated in this
proxy statement and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the
enclosed proxy card gives discretionary authority to the persons named as
proxies to vote the shares represented by the proxy card in their discretion.
Under
Delaware law and the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, if a
quorum exists at the meeting, the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes
cast at the meeting is required for the election of directors. A properly
executed proxy marked “Withhold authority” with respect to the election of one
or more directors will not be voted with respect to the director or directors
indicated, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether
there
is a quorum. For each other item, the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote
on
the item will be required for approval. A properly executed proxy marked
“Abstain” with respect to any such matter will not be voted, although it will be
counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. Accordingly,
an
abstention will have the effect of a negative vote.
For
shares held in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, the broker or
nominee may not be permitted to exercise voting discretion with respect to
some
of the matters to be acted upon. Thus, if stockholders do not give their broker
or nominee specific instructions, their shares may not be voted on those matters
and will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for
approval. Shares represented by such “broker non-votes” will, however, be
counted in determining whether there is a quorum.
A
stockholder of record may revoke a proxy at any time before it is voted at
the
Annual Meeting by (a) delivering a proxy revocation or another duly
executed proxy bearing a later date to Mr. Li Jie, the Secretary of the Company,
at No. 1 Henglong Road, Yu Qiao Development Zone, Shashi District, Jing Zhou
City, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China, or (b) attending the
Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will
not
revoke a proxy unless the stockholder actually votes in person at the meeting.
The
proxy
card accompanying this proxy statement is solicited by the Board of Directors
of
the Company. The Company will pay all of the costs of soliciting proxies. In
addition to solicitation by mail, officers, directors and employees of the
Company may solicit proxies personally, or by telephone, without receiving
additional compensation. The Company, if requested, will also pay brokers,
banks
and other fiduciaries who hold shares of Common Stock for beneficial owners
for
their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of forwarding these materials to
stockholders.
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS
The
name,
age and year in which the term expires of each member of the Board of Directors
of the Company is set forth below:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Term
Expires
on
the
Annual
Meeting
held
in the Year
|
|
Hanlin
Chen
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Qizhou
Wu
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Chief
Operating Officer and Director
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Yiu
Wong Tse Andy
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Sr.
VP, Director
|
|
|
resigned
on May 22, 2007
|
|
Guangxun
Xu
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
resigned
on May 11, 2007
|
|
Robert
Tung
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Dr.
Haimian Cai
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007
|
|
William
E. Thomson
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007
|
|
At
the
Annual Meeting, the stockholders will vote on the election of Hanlin Chen,
Qizhou Wu, Robert Tung, Dr. Haimian Cai and William E. Thomson as directors
to
serve for a one-year term until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2008
and
until their successors are elected and qualified. All directors will hold office
until the annual meeting of stockholders at which their terms expire and the
election and qualification of their successors.
NOMINEES
AND CONTINUING DIRECTORS
The
following individuals have been nominated for election to the Board of Directors
or will continue to serve on the Board of Directors after the Annual Meeting:
Hanlin
Chen has served as Chairman of the board and CEO since March 2003. Mr. Chen
is a
standing board member of Political Consulting Committee of Jingzhou City and
vice president of Foreign Investors Association of Hubei Province. He was the
general manager of Shashi
Jiulong Power Steering Gears Co., Ltd. from
1993
to 1997. Since 1997, he has been the Chairman of the Board of Henglong
Automotive Parts, Ltd.
Qizhou
Wu has served as a Director and the Chief Operating Officer since March
2003. He was the Managing Vice General Manager of Shashi Jiulong Power
Steering Gears Co., Ltd. from 1993 to 1999 and GM of Henglong Automotive
Parts, Ltd. from
1999
to 2002. Mr. Wu graduated from Tsinghua University in Beijing with a
Masters degree in Automobile Engineering.
Robert
Tung has been a Director of the Company since September 2003 and a member of
the
Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee. Since 2001, Mr. Tung has been engaging in different
ventures in China which include commodities trading, real estate development,
assisting Chinese companies go public in North America, brokering Chinese
companies to invest into overseas resources exploitation, etc. Mr. Tung is
currently the President of Multi-Media Communications, Inc., and Executive
Vice
President of Super Microbial Sciences International, LLC. Mr. Tung holds a
M.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Virginia and B.S. degrees
in
Computer Science and Chemical Engineering from the University of Maryland and
National Taiwan University, respectively.
Dr.
Haimian Cai has been a Director since September 2003 and a member of the
Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee. Dr. Cai is a technical specialist in the automotive
industry from 2001 to 2003. Prior to that, Dr. Cai was a staff engineer in
ITT Automotive Inc. Dr. Cai has written more than fifteen technical papers
and co-authored a technical book regarding the power of metallurgy industry
for
automotive application. Dr. Cai has more than ten patents including
pending patents. Dr. Cai holds a B.S. Degree in Automotive Engineering
from Tsinghua University and a M.S. and Ph. D. in manufacturing engineering
from
Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
William
E. Thomson, CA, has been a Director of the Company since September 2003 and
is a
member of the Company’s Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees. Mr.
Thomson has been the president of Thomson Associates, Inc., a leading merchant
banking and crisis management company, since 1978. Mr. Thomson’s current
additional directorships include: TSX -Open EC Technologies (Software), Score
Media Inc. (formerly Headline Media Group Inc.) (Media), Industrial Minerals
Inc. (Mining); Private - Electrical Contacts Ltd. (Electrical Contacts),
Redpearl Funding Corporation (IT Financing), Wright Environmental Management
Inc. (Waste Management Solutions), YTW Growth Capital Management Corporation
(Capital Pool Company), Wiresmith Ltd. (POP), Han Wind Energy (Sustainable
Energy), Summit Energy Management (Oil and Gas), Paradox Financial Solutions
Inc. (Supply Chain Financing), Debt Freedom Canada Inc. (Financing), and
Confederation of Italian Entrepreneurs Worldwide Canada.
Other
than as noted above, there are no family relationships among any of the
Company’s directors or executive officers.
DIRECTOR
NOMINATION
Criteria
for Board Membership. In recommending candidates
for appointment or re-election to the Board, the nominating/corporate governance
committee (the “nominating/corporate governance committee”) considers the
appropriate balance of experience, skills and characteristics required of the
Board of Directors. It seeks to ensure that at least three directors are
independent under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, that members of the
Company’s audit committee meet the financial literacy and sophistication
requirements under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, and at least one member
of the Board qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under the rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Nominees for director are recommended
on the basis of their depth and breadth of experience, integrity, ability to
make independent analytical inquiries, understanding of the Company’s business
environment, and willingness to devote adequate time to Board
duties.
Stockholder
Nominees. The nominating/corporate governance committee will consider written
proposals from stockholders for nominees for director. Any such nominations
should be submitted to the nominating/corporate governance committee c/o Mr.
Li
Jie, the Secretary of the Company, and should include the following information:
(a) all information relating to such nominee that is required to be
disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy
statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); (b) the
names and addresses of the stockholders making the nomination and the number
of
shares of the Company’s common stock which are owned beneficially and of record
by such stockholders; and (c) appropriate biographical information and a
statement as to the qualification of the nominee, and should be submitted in
the
time frame described in the Bylaws of the Company and under the caption,
“Stockholder Proposals for 2006 Annual Meeting” below.
Process
for Identifying and Evaluating Nominees. The nominating/corporate governance
committee believes the company is well-served by its current directors. In
the
ordinary course, absent special circumstances or a material change in the
criteria for Board membership, the nominating/corporate governance committee
will renominate incumbent directors who continue to be qualified for Board
service and are willing to continue as directors. If an incumbent director
is
not standing for re-election, or if a vacancy on the Board occurs between annual
stockholder meetings, the nominating/corporate governance committee will seek
out potential candidates for Board appointment who meet the criteria for
selection as a nominee and have the specific qualities or skills being sought.
Director candidates will be selected based on input from members of the Board,
senior management of the company and, if the nominating/corporate governance
committee deems appropriate, a third-party search firm. The nominating/corporate
governance committee will evaluate each candidate's qualifications and check
relevant references; in addition, such candidates will be interviewed by at
least one member of the nominating/corporate governance committee. Candidates
meriting serious consideration will meet with all members of the Board. Based
on
this input, the nominating/corporate governance committee will evaluate which
of
the prospective candidates is qualified to serve as a director and whether
the
committee should recommend to the Board that this candidate be appointed to
fill
a current vacancy on the Board, or presented for the approval of the
stockholders, as appropriate.
The
Company has never received a proposal from a stockholder to nominate a director.
Although the nominating/corporate governance committee has not adopted a formal
policy with respect to stockholder nominees, the committee expects that the
evaluation process for a stockholder nominee would be similar to the process
outlined above.
Board
Nominees for the 2007 Annual Meeting. Each
of
the nominees listed in this proxy statement are current directors standing
for
re-election.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Effective
July 1, 2006, independent Directors receive a director fee from the Company
for
their services as members of the Board of Directors and any committee of the
Board of Directors in the amount of $8,000 per quarter. They are reimbursed
for certain expenses in connection with attending Board and committee meetings.
The
Company has also granted, and expects to continue to grant, non-employee
directors options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The
shareholders of the Company have approved certain director grants at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders in 2005, which grants were included in the 2004 stock
option plan.
On
June
28, 2005, the Company issued additional options to purchase 7,500 shares of
common stock to each of its three independent directors. Such stock
options were vested immediately upon grant and are exercisable at $6.83 per
share over a period of five years. The exercise price represented the fair
market value based on the grant date of the stock options.
On
July
6, 2006, the Company issued additional options to purchase 7,500 shares of
common stock to each of its three independent directors. Such stock
options were vested immediately upon grant and are exercisable at $7.94 per
share over a period of five years. The exercise price represented the fair
market value based on the grant date of the stock options.
BOARD
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The
Company’s Board of Directors met four (4) times during fiscal 2006. The audit
committee met four (4) times, the compensation committee met two (2) times
and
the nominating/corporate governance committee met two (2) times during fiscal
2006. Each member of the Board attended 75% or more of the Board meetings,
and
each member of the Board who served on either the audit, compensation or
nominating/corporate governance committee attended at least 75% of the committee
meetings.
The
Board
has determined that the following directors are “independent” under current
Nasdaq rules: Guangxun Xu (resigned in May 2007), Robert Tung, Dr. Haimian
Cai
and William E. Thomson.
The
Board
of Directors has standing audit, compensation and nominating/corporate
governance committees.
Audit
Committee.
The
audit committee currently consists of William E. Thomson (chairman), Robert
Tung
and Dr. Haimian Cai. The Board has determined that all members of the audit
committee are independent directors under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market
and each of them is able to read and understand fundamental financial
statements. The Board has determined that William E. Thomson qualifies as an
“audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The purpose of the audit committee is to oversee the
accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and audits of its
financial statements. The responsibilities of the audit committee include
appointing and providing the compensation of the independent accountants to
conduct the annual audit of our accounts, reviewing the scope and results of
the
independent audits, reviewing and evaluating internal accounting policies,
and
approving all professional services to be provided to the Company by its
independent accountants. The audit committee operates under a written charter
that was included as Appendix C with the Company’s definitive proxy statement
filed with the SEC on June 18, 2005.
Compensation
Committee.
The
compensation committee currently consists of Dr. Haimian Cai (chairman),
William E. Thomson and Robert Tung. The Board has determined that all members
of
the compensation committee are independent directors under the rules of the
Nasdaq Stock Market. The compensation committee administers the Company’s
benefit plans, reviews and administers all compensation arrangements for
executive officers, and establishes and reviews general policies relating to
the
compensation and benefits of our officers and employees.
Nominating/corporate
governance Committee.
The
nominating/corporate governance committee currently consists of Robert Tung
(chairman), William E. Thomson, and Dr. Haimian Cai, each of whom the Board
has
determined is an independent director under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock
Market. The nominating/corporate governance committee’s responsibilities include
recommending to the Board of Directors nominees for possible election to the
Board of Directors and providing oversight with respect to corporate governance.
The nominating/corporate governance committee operates under a written charter
that was included as Appendix B with the Company’s definitive proxy statement
filed with the SEC on June 18, 2005.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
For
the
twelve months ended December 31, 2006, none of our executive officers had a
relationship that would constitute an interlocking relationship with executive
officers or directors of another entity or insider participation in compensation
decisions.
COMMUNICATIONS
WITH DIRECTORS
Stockholders
interested in communicating directly with our Directors may send an e-mail
to
the Company’s independent director William Thomson at Bill.Thomson@chl.com.cn.
Mr. Thomson will review all such correspondence and will regularly forward
to
the Board of Directors copies of all such correspondence that deals with the
functions of the Board or committees thereof or that he otherwise determines
requires their attention. Directors may at any time review all of the
correspondence received that is addressed to members of the Board of Directors
and request copies of such correspondence. Concerns relating to accounting,
internal controls or auditing matters will immediately be brought to the
attention of the Audit Committee and handled in accordance with procedures
established by the Audit Committee with respect to such matters.
The
Company has a policy of encouraging all directors to attend the annual
stockholder meetings. This will be the third Annual Meeting since the Company's
current management took over the Company in March, 2003. Last year seven (7)
directors attended the Annual Meeting.
CODE
OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS
The
Company has adopted a code of conduct and ethics that applies to all directors,
officers and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal
financial officer and controller. This code of conduct and ethics was filed
as
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND
OFFICERS
AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The
following table sets forth certain information known to the Company with respect
to the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock as of May 31, 2007
by
(i) each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5%
of
the Company's Common Stock, (ii) each of the Company's directors and executive
officers, and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group. Except
as
otherwise listed below, the address of each person is c/o China Automotive
Systems, Inc., No. 1 Henglong Road, Yu Qiao Development Zone, Shashi District,
Jing Zhou City, Hubei Province, the People's Republic of China. Percentage
ownership is based upon 23,959,702 shares outstanding as of May 31, 2007.
Name,
Title, Address
|
|
Number
of Shares
Beneficially
Owned (1)
|
|
Percentage
Ownership (1)
|
|
Hanlin
Chen, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President
|
|
|
15,371,972
|
|
|
64.2
|
%
|
Qizhou
Wu, Chief Operating Officer, Director
|
|
|
2,195,996
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Other
executive officers
|
|
|
2,322,959
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Robert
Tung, Director
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
--
|
|
Dr.
Haimian Cai, Director
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
--
|
|
William
E. Thomson, Director
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
--
|
|
All
current Executive Officers as a Group
|
|
|
19,890,927
|
|
|
83.0
|
%
|
All
current Directors who are not Executive Officers as a
Group
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
(1)
The
number of shares beneficially owned by a person includes Common Stock subject
to
options held by that person that were currently exercisable at, or exercisable
within 60 days of the date of this proxy statement. The Common Stock issuable
under those options are treated as if they were outstanding for purposes of
computing the percentage ownership of the person holding these options but
are
not treated as if they were outstanding for the purposes of computing the
percentage ownership of any other person.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Effective
August 31, 2004, in order to concentrate on its main products, namely steering
and automotive parts, the Company disposed of its 51% interest in Jingzhou
Henglong Fulida Textile Co., Ltd., “Jingzhou”, by entering into an exchange
agreement with Hubei Wanlong Investment Co., Ltd., “HBWL”, which is controlled
by Mr. Hanlin Chen, the Chairman of the Company. Pursuant to the exchange
agreement, the 51% equity interest in Jingzhou owned by Ji Long Enterprise
Investment Limited was exchanged for 2.5% of HBWL’s equity interests in Jinzhou
Henglong Automotive Parts Co., Ltd., “Henglong”, based on their respective fair
market values as determined by an independent appraisal firm. The
difference between the fair value and the book value resulting from the
disposition of the joint venture interest in Jingzhou was debited to additional
paid-in capital. With respect to consideration paid by the Company in
excess of the Chairman’s basis in his investment, such excess has been charged
to additional paid-in capital as a distribution to the Chairman, resulting
in
the acquired 2.5% equity interests in Henglong being recorded by the Company
at
the Chairman’s original cost basis. The Company paid approximately $90,000
to HBWL in conjunction with this transaction.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company co-built a Scientific Research
and
Administrative Building with WuHan Geological University Information S&T
Development Co., Ltd., “WuHan Information”. The building was completed in
2005, and the Company paid $2,468,574 in advance for WuHan Information, which
was recorded in the other receivables of the balance sheet for December 31,
2005. This advance is secured by a mortgage and bears interest at a
conventional bank rate.
SECTION 16(A)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Under
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
and SEC rules, the Company’s directors, executive officers and beneficial owners
of more than 10% of any class of equity security are required to file periodic
reports of their ownership, and changes in that ownership, with the SEC. Based
solely on its review of copies of these reports and representations of such
reporting persons, the Company believes that during fiscal year 2006, such
SEC filing requirements were satisfied, except for Mr. Shengbin Yu and Mr.
Shaobo Wang, who are executive officers and who did not file Form 3 until May
24, 2007.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion And Analysis
Compensation
Philosophy
The
Company’s Compensation Committee is empowered to review and approve the annual
compensation and compensation procedures for the executive officers of the
Company. The primary goals of the Compensation Committee with respect to
executive compensation are to attract, retain and motivate the most talented
and
dedicated executives possible, encourage high performance, and to align
executives’ and employees’ incentives with stockholder value creation.
Currently,
executive compensation comprises of base salaries competitive with comparable
manufacturers in China. The Compensation Committee may award bonuses to
encourage executives to focus on the achievement of specific short-term
corporate goals and set compensation at levels the committee believes are
comparable with executives in other companies of similar size and stage of
development operating in similar industry while taking into account our relative
performance and our own strategic goals and reward them for their achievement.
The Compensation Committee may award stock options and reward management for
performance, which benefits our shareholders. The Compensation Committee may
use
traditional measures of corporate performance, such as earnings per share or
sales growth, in reviewing performance of executives. It also evaluates other
indications of performance, such as corporate development activities. These
considerations involve an assessment by the Compensation Committee of individual
and corporate performance.
We
have
not retained a compensation consultant to review our policies and procedures
with respect to executive compensation. We conduct an annual review of the
aggregate level of our executive compensation, as well as the mix of elements
used to compensate our executive officers. We compare compensation levels with
amounts currently being paid to executives in our industry and most importantly
with local practices in China. We are satisfied that our compensation levels
are
competitive with local conditions.
Base
Salary
Base
salary ranges are reviewed annually and adjustments are made at the beginning
of
the fiscal year to reflect changes in position responsibilities or market
conditions. When establishing or reviewing compensation levels for each
executive officer, the Compensation Committee considers numerous factors,
including the qualifications of the executive, his or her level of relevant
experience, specific operating roles and duties and strategic goals for which
the executive has responsibility.
Base
salaries for our executives are established based on the scope of their
responsibilities, taking into account competitive market compensation.
Generally, we believe that executive base salaries should be targeted near
the
median of the range of salaries for executives in similar positions with similar
responsibilities at comparable companies, in line with our compensation
philosophy. In setting annual base salaries, the Compensation Committee also
reviews and evaluates the performance of the department or activity for which
the executive has responsibility, the impact of that department or activity
on
the Company and the skills and experience required for the job, coupled with
a
comparison of these elements with similar elements for peer executives both
inside and outside the Company. Adjustments to each individual’s base salary are
made in connection with annual performance reviews.
Discretionary
Bonuses
The
Compensation Committee has the authority to award discretionary annual bonuses
to our executive officers under the Compensation Committee Charter and
determines the specific amounts of such bonuses. Cash bonuses are awarded on
a
discretionary basis, usually following the Company’s fiscal year-end, and are
based on the achievement of corporate and individual goals set by the Board
and
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer at the beginning of the year, as well as
the financial condition of the Company. So far, no discretionary bonus has
been
awarded. Generally, the Compensation Committee may recommend to the Board the
amount of the bonus, with advice from the Company’s management. The Compensation
Committee makes its recommendations based upon an assessment of the individual’s
contributions and accomplishments achieved during the past year. The
Compensation Committee also considers general business and economic factors
relating to the Company in recommending the size of the bonus pool and adjusts
bonuses based on those factors as well. The Compensation Committee typically
sets target bonus opportunities for the executive officers, calculated as a
percentage of base salary.
Long-Term
Incentive Program
We
believe that long-term performance is achieved through an ownership culture
that
encourages such performance by our key employees through the use of stock
options. Our stock compensation plan has been established to provide certain
of
our employees with incentives to help align those employees’ interests with the
interests of stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes that the use
of
stock options offers the best approach to achieving our compensation goals.
We
have not adopted stock ownership guidelines. We believe that the annual
aggregate value of these awards should be set near competitive median levels
for
comparable companies.
Stock
Options
The
Company may use the grant of options under its 2004 stock option plan to
underscore the common interests of stockholders and management. The Compensation
Committee has not granted any options to management for fiscal 2006. Options
to
be granted to executive officers are intended to provide a continuing financial
incentive to maximize long-term value to stockholders and to make each
executive’s total compensation opportunity competitive. Options will encourage
executives to remain in the long-term employ of the Company because the right
to
purchase shares of common stock underlying options generally vest over a period
of four years and, if exercised prior to vesting, are subject to a right of
repurchase by the Company at the original exercise price, which lapses over
a
period of several years. In determining the amount of an option to be granted
to
an executive officer, the Compensation Committee takes into account an officer’s
position and level of responsibility within the Company, the officer’s existing
stock and option holdings, and the potential reward to the officer if the stock
price appreciates in the public market. Stock option awards are intended to
align the interests of executives with the interests of the stockholders in
our
long-term performance.
In
addition, the Compensation Committee reviews the equity position of all
executive officers on an annual basis and awards stock options to executive
officers periodically.
Our
stock
option plan authorizes us to grant options to purchase shares of common stock
to
our employees, directors and consultants. Li Jie, our board secretary, is the
administrator of the stock option plan. The stock options plan was approved
in
the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the maximum number of common shares
for issuance under this plan is 2,200,000 with a period of 10 years. During
2004, the Company issued options to purchase 7,500 shares of common stock to
each of its three independent directors. Such share options vested immediately
upon grant and are exercisable at $4.50 per share over a period of two years.
On
June 28, 2005, the Company issued additional options to purchase 7,500 shares
of
common stock to each of its three independent directors. Such stock options
vested immediately upon grant and are exercisable at $6.83 per share over a
period of five years. On July 6, 2006, the Company issued options to purchase
7,500 shares of common stock to each of its three independent directors. Such
stock options vested immediately upon grant and are exercisable at $7.94 per
share over a period of five years. The exercise price represents the fair market
value based on the grant date of the stock options. These grants were made
to
encourage an ownership culture among our independent directors. None of our
executive officer nor the chief operating officers has been granted any stock
options.
The
Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.
123R, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, which establishes a fair value
method of accounting for stock-based compensation plans. In accordance with
SFAS
No. 123R, the cost of stock options and warrants issued to employees is measured
at the grant date based on the fair value. The fair value is determined using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The resulting amount is charged to
expense on the straight-line basis over the period in which the Company expects
to receive benefit, which is generally the vesting period.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
We
currently do not have any Stock Appreciation Rights Plan that authorizes us
to
grant stock appreciation rights.
Other
Compensation.
Other
than the annual salary for our executive officers and the bonus that may be
awarded to them at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, we do not
have
any other benefits and perquisites for our executive officers; however, the
Compensation Committee in its discretion may provide benefits and perquisites
to
these executive officers if it deems it advisable.
Executive
Officer Compensation and Chief Executive Officer’s Compensation
In
setting compensation payable for fiscal year 2006 and planning the compensation
payable for fiscal year 2006 to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr.
Hanlin Chen, and to the other executive officers, the Compensation Committee
reviewed the importance of each executive officer’s individual achievements in
meeting the Company’s goals and objectives set for the prior fiscal year as well
as the overall achievement of the goals by the entire company.
The
determination by the Compensation Committee of the Chief Executive Officer’s
remuneration is based upon methods consistent with those used for other
executive officers. The Compensation Committee considers certain quantitative
factors, including the Company’s financial, strategic, and operating performance
for the year as well as certain qualitative criteria including leadership
qualities and management skills, as exhibited by innovations, time and effort
devoted to the Company and other general considerations in determining
appropriate compensation of the Chief Executive Officer.
In
2006,
the Compensation Committee continued Mr. Chen’s annualized salary at $100,000.
The Compensation Committee did not grant any bonus or stock option to Mr. Chen.
In determining Mr. Chen’s 2006 compensation, including whether to grant stock
options to him, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Chen’s overall
compensation package as compared with other chief executive officers in our
industry, as well as the effectiveness of Mr. Chen’s leadership of the
Company
The
Compensation Committee believes that the continued commitment and leadership
of
our executive officers through fiscal year 2006 were and continue to be
important factors in the achievements of the Company.
Compliance
with Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)
Section 162(m)
of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code limits the tax deductibility by a corporation
of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any of its five most highly
compensated executive officers. However, compensation which qualifies as
“performance-based” is excluded from the $1 million limit if, among other
requirements, the compensation is payable only upon attainment of
pre-established, objective performance goals under a plan approved by
stockholders. The compensation committee does not presently expect total cash
compensation payable for salaries to exceed the $1 million limit for any
individual executive. It is the current policy of the compensation committee
to
maximize, to the extent reasonably possible, our ability to obtain a corporate
tax deduction for compensation paid to our executive officers to the extent
consistent with the best interests of our company and our stockholders.
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following Summary Compensation Table sets forth the compensation earned by
the
Company's Chief Executive Officer during the fiscal years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004. No other executive officer received compensation for the
fiscal year 2006 in excess of $100,000.
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensa-tion
(4)
|
Change
in Pension Value and Nonquali-fied Deferred Compen-sation
Earnings
($)
|
All
Other Compensation ($)
|
Total
($)
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
Hanlin
Chen, PEO
|
200620052004
|
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
|
Daming
Hu, PFO
|
2006
|
60,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$60,000
|
There
are
no employment agreements with any of our executive officers. In the last fiscal
year through the date of this proxy statement, the Company has not granted
stock
options to its Chief Executive Officer, nor to its four highest paid executive
officers, other than its Chief Executive Officer.
REPORT
OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Under
the
guidance of a written charter adopted by the Board, the purpose of the
compensation committee is to develop and review compensation policies and
practices applicable to executive officers, review and recommend goals for
the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and evaluate his performance in light of these
goals, review and evaluate goals and objectives for other officers, oversee
and
evaluate the Company’s equity incentive plans and review and approve the
creation or amendment of such plans. We believe that the composition of the
Company’s compensation committee meets the requirements for independence under,
and the functioning of the Company’s compensation committee complies with, any
applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Nasdaq National
Market and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This
report is submitted by the compensation committee and addresses the compensation
policies for 2006 as such policies affected Mr. Hanlin Chen, in his capacity
as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and the other executive officers of
the
Company.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
Dr.
Haimian Cai (chairman), William E. Thomson and Robert Tung
The
compensation committee report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference
by
any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into
any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act 0f 1934, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under these acts.
REPORT
OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Under
the
guidance of a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, the purpose
of
the Audit Committee is to oversee the accounting and financial reporting
processes of the Company and audits of its financial statements. The
responsibilities of the Audit Committee include appointing and providing for
the
compensation of the independent accountants. Each of the members of the Audit
Committee meets the independence requirements of Nasdaq.
Management
has primary responsibility for the system of internal controls and the financial
reporting process. The independent accountants have the responsibility to
express an opinion on the financial statements based on an audit conducted
in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
In
this
context and in connection with the audited financial statements contained in
the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2006, the Audit Committee:
· |
reviewed
and discussed the audited financial statements as of and for the
fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006 with the Company’s management and the
independent accountants;
|
· |
discussed
with Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP, the Company’s independent auditors,
the matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards
No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended by Statement
of Auditing Standards No. 90, Audit Committee Communications;
|
· |
reviewed
the written disclosures and the letter from Schwartz Levitsky Feldman
LLP
required by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1,
Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, discussed with the
auditors their independence, and concluded that the non-audit services
performed by Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP are compatible with maintaining
their independence;
|
· |
based
on the foregoing reviews and discussions, recommended to the Board
of
Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the
Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission;
and
|
· |
instructed
the independent auditors that the Audit Committee expects to be advised
if
there are any subjects that require special attention.
|
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
William
E. Thomson (chairman), Robert Tung and Dr. Haimian Cai.
Audit
Committee’s Pre-Approval Policy
During
fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the Audit Committee of
the
Board of Directors adopted policies and procedures for the pre-approval of
all
audit and non-audit services to be provided by the Company’s independent auditor
and for the prohibition of certain services from being provided by the
independent auditor. The Company may not engage the Company’s independent
auditor to render any audit or non-audit service unless the service is approved
in advance by the Audit Committee or the engagement to render the service is
entered into pursuant to the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and
procedures. On an annual basis, the Audit Committee may pre-approve services
that are expected to be provided to the Company by the independent auditor
during the fiscal year. At the time such pre-approval is granted, the Audit
Committee specifies the pre-approved services and establishes a monetary limit
with respect to each particular pre-approved service, which limit may not be
exceeded without obtaining further pre-approval under the policy. For any
pre-approval, the Audit Committee considers whether such services are consistent
with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission on auditor
independence.
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
The
Audit
Committee has appointed Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP as the Company’s
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.
The
following table shows the fees paid or accrued by the Company for the audit
and
other services provided by Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP for fiscal 2006 and
2005.
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Fees
|
|
$
|
244,500
|
|
$
|
190,000
|
|
Audit-Related
Fees(1)
|
|
|
19,715
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
Tax
Fees(2)
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
All
other Fees(3)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
271,215
|
|
$
|
204,000
|
|
___________________
(1) Includes accounting and reporting consultations related to
acquisitions and internal control procedures.
|
|
(2)
Includes fees for service related to tax compliance services, preparation
and filing of tax returns and tax consulting services.
|
|
(3)
Includes fees for business trips.
|
PERFORMANCE
GRAPH
The
following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return data for the
Company’s stock since October, 2003 (the date on which the Company’s business
was combined with the shell company and the Company’s stock was registered under
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) to the
cumulative return over such period of the Nasdaq Stock Market Index. The graph
assumes that $100 was invested in October, 2003, the date on which the Company
was listed on Nasdaq, in the common stock of the Company and in the comparative
index. The graph further assumes that such amount was initially invested in
the
common stock of the Company at a per share price of $100, and reinvestment
of
any dividends. The stock price performance on the following graph is not
necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
PROPOSAL
1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At
the
Annual Meeting, the stockholders will vote on the election of five directors
to
serve for a one-year term until the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders and
until their successors are elected and qualified. The Board of Directors has
unanimously approved the nomination of Hanlin Chen, Qizhou Wu, Robert Tung,
Dr.
Haimian Cai and William E. Thomson for election to the Board of Directors.
The
nominees have indicated that they are willing and able to serve as directors.
If
any of these individuals becomes unable or unwilling to serve, the accompanying
proxy may be voted for the election of such other person as shall be designated
by the Board of Directors. The Directors will be elected by a plurality of
the
votes cast, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting, assuming a quorum
is
present. Stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights in the election
of
directors.
The
Board of Directors recommends a vote “for” the election of Hanlin Chen, Qizhou
Wu, Robert Tung, Dr. Haimian Cai and William E. Thomson as directors.
Unless
otherwise instructed, it is the intention of the persons named in the
accompanying proxy card to vote shares represented by properly executed proxy
cards for the election of Hanlin Chen, Qizhou Wu, Robert Tung, Dr. Haimian
Cai
and William E. Thomson.
PROPOSAL
2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
At
the
Annual Meeting, the stockholders will be asked to ratify the appointment of
Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. Representatives of Schwartz Levitsky
Feldman LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have
the
opportunity to make statements if they desire to do so. Such representatives
are
also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The
Board of Directors recommends a vote “for” the ratification of the appointment
of Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.
OTHER
MATTERS
As
of the
time of preparation of this proxy statement, neither the Board of Directors
nor
management intends to bring before the meeting any business other than the
matters referred to in the Notice of Annual Meeting and this proxy statement.
If
any other business should properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment
thereof, the persons named in the proxy will vote on such matters according
to
their best judgment.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR 2008 ANNUAL MEETING
Under
the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, stockholders who wish to submit
proposals for inclusion in the proxy statement of the Board of Directors for
the
2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must submit such proposals so as to be
received by the Company at No. 1 Henglong Road, Yu Qiao Development Zone, Shashi
District, Jing Zhou City, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China, on or
before April 3, 2008. In addition, if the Company is not notified by the
secretary of the Company of a proposal to be brought before the 2008 Annual
Meeting by a stockholder on or before June 16, 2008, then proxies held by
management may provide the discretion to vote against such proposal even though
it is not discussed in the proxy statement for such meeting.
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors
|
|
Chen
Hanlin
Chairman
|
Hubei,
People's Republic of China
August
1,
2007
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
WHETHER
OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND MAIL
PROMPTLY THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE, WHICH
REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES. THIS WILL ENSURE THE
PRESENCE OF A QUORUM AT THE MEETING. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY VOTE
IN
PERSON IF YOU WISH TO DO SO EVEN IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SENT IN YOUR PROXY
CARD.
China
Automotive Systems, Inc.
Proxy
Solicited by the Board of Directors
for
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to
be Held September 5, 2007
The
undersigned hereby appoints Hanlin Chen and Qizhou Wu or any one of them with
full power of substitution, proxies to vote at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of China Automotive Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) to be held on
September 5, 2007 at 10 a.m., local time, and at any adjournment thereof, hereby
revoking any proxies heretofore given, to vote all shares of Common Stock of
the
Company held or owned by the undersigned as directed on the reverse side of
this
proxy card, and in their discretion upon such other matters as may come before
the meeting.
1. To
elect
Hanlin Chen, Qizhou Wu, Robert Tung, Dr. Haimian Cai and William E. Thomson
as
directors, to hold office until the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
until their successors are elected and qualified, the nominees listed
below:
___
|
|
FOR
All
nominees listed
(except
as indicated
below)
|
|
___
|
|
WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY
to
vote (as to all nominees)
|
To
withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write the nominee’s name
on the line provided below.
2. To
ratify
the appointment of Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP as the Company’s independent
auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
___ For
|
|
___ Against
|
|
___ Abstain
|
The
Board
recommends that you vote FOR the above proposals. This proxy, when properly
executed, will be voted in the manner directed above. WHEN NO CHOICE IS
INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ABOVE PROPOSALS. This proxy may
be
revoked by the undersigned at any time, prior to the time it is voted by any
of
the means described in the accompanying proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature(s)
of Stockholder(s)
|
|
|
Date
and sign exactly as name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. If signing for
estates, trusts, corporations or other entities, title or capacity
should
be stated. If shares are held jointly, each holder should
sign.
|
|
|
Date:___________,
2007
|
PLEASE
COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THIS PROXY
AND
RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.