UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2015
¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 333-187164
TRUETT-HURST, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 46-1561499 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. employer identification number) |
125 Foss Creek Circle, Healdsburg, California | 95448 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (zip code) |
(707) 431-4423
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | ||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | x |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class A | Number of Shares Outstanding | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share | 4,031,995 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2 |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
September 30, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,769 | $ | 1,679 | ||||
Accounts receivable | 3,587 | 2,797 | ||||||
Inventories | 24,257 | 22,127 | ||||||
Bulk wine deposit | 25 | 345 | ||||||
Other current assets | 144 | 316 | ||||||
Total current assets | 30,782 | 27,264 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 5,879 | 5,751 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 485 | 481 | ||||||
Other assets, net | 419 | 407 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 37,565 | $ | 33,903 | ||||
Liabilities and Equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Credit facilities | $ | 9,995 | $ | 9,034 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 6,531 | 4,176 | ||||||
Accrual for sales returns | 518 | 524 | ||||||
Due to related parties | 334 | 134 | ||||||
Current maturities of long term debt | 532 | 368 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 17,910 | 14,236 | ||||||
Deferred rent liability | 18 | 26 | ||||||
Long term debt, net of current maturities | 3,504 | 3,272 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 21,432 | 17,534 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) | ||||||||
Equity: | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock, par value of $0.001 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 | - | - | ||||||
Class A common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, 15,000,000 authorized, 4,031,995 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and 4,010,120 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Class B common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, 1,000 authorized, 8 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 | - | - | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 14,704 | 14,618 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (5,568 | ) | (5,356 | ) | ||||
Total Truett-Hurst, Inc. equity | 9,140 | 9,266 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests | 6,993 | 7,103 | ||||||
Total equity | 16,133 | 16,369 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 37,565 | $ | 33,903 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Sales | $ | 6,978 | $ | 6,614 | ||||
Less excise tax | (163 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||
Net sales | 6,815 | 6,482 | ||||||
Cost of sales | 4,471 | 4,047 | ||||||
Gross profit | 2,344 | 2,435 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Sales and marketing | 1,581 | 1,565 | ||||||
General and administrative | 910 | 943 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets | (1 | ) | 2 | |||||
Total operating expenses | 2,490 | 2,510 | ||||||
Loss from operations | (146 | ) | (75 | ) | ||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||
Interest expense, net | (83 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||
Other | (93 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Total other expense | (176 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||
Loss before income taxes | (322 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense | - | 2 | ||||||
Net loss before noncontrolling interest | (322 | ) | (150 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest: The Wine Spies, LLC | 16 | 36 | ||||||
Net loss attributable to Truett-Hurst, Inc. and H.D.D. LLC | (338 | ) | (186 | ) | ||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest: H.D.D. LLC | (126 | ) | (86 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to Truett-Hurst, Inc. | $ | (212 | ) | $ | (100 | ) | ||
Net loss per share: | ||||||||
Basic and diluted | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||
Weighted average shares used in computing net loss per share: | ||||||||
Basic and diluted | ||||||||
4,027,183 | 3,750,472 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net loss before noncontrolling interests | $ | (322 | ) | $ | (150 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 155 | 154 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation | 86 | 138 | ||||||
Deferred rent | (8 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Deferred taxes | - | (2 | ) | |||||
Loss (gain) on fair value of interest rate swap | 72 | (5 | ) | |||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets | (1 | ) | 2 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (790 | ) | (659 | ) | ||||
Inventories | (2,130 | ) | (6,481 | ) | ||||
Bulk wine deposit | 320 | 1,424 | ||||||
Other current assets | 172 | (15 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 2,285 | 4,938 | ||||||
Accrual for sales returns | (6 | ) | - | |||||
Due to related parties | 200 | (18 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 33 | (679 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Acquisition of property and equipment | (260 | ) | (392 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of intangible and other assets | (42 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets | 2 | - | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (300 | ) | (423 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Net proceeds from line of credit | 961 | 370 | ||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt | 481 | - | ||||||
Payments on long-term debt | (85 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,357 | 287 | ||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 1,090 | (815 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 1,679 | 5,567 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 2,769 | $ | 4,752 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 81 | $ | 39 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | - | $ | 2 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of Truett-Hurst, Inc. (“THI”) and its subsidiaries: H.D.D. LLC (“LLC”) and The Wine Spies, LLC (“Wine Spies”) (collectively, “we,” “Truett-Hurst” “our,” “us,” or “the Company”) and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with general instructions for quarterly reports filed on Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. THI consolidates the financial results of the LLC and its consolidated subsidiary, and records a noncontrolling interest for the economic interest in the LLC and its consolidated subsidiary. Such noncontrolling interest represents the portion of equity ownership in the aforementioned subsidiaries that is not attributable to THI.
The accompanying unaudited financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for audited financial statements. We prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements on the same basis as the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, and, in the opinion of management, these financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented. The operating results for the interim period presented are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 filed with the SEC on September 28, 2015.
Quantities or results referred to as “to date” or “as of this date” mean as of or to September 30, 2015, unless otherwise specifically noted. References to “FY” or “fiscal year” refer to our fiscal year ending on June 30th of the designated year.
Unless otherwise indicated, the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements relate to the discussion of our continuing operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported consolidated results of operations.
Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, or ASU 2014-15, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASU 2014-15 applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
6 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-05: Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement (“ASU 2015-05”). The amendments in this update provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the update specifies that the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. The update further specifies that the customer should account for a cloud computing arrangement as a service contract if the arrangement does not include a software license. ASU 2015-05 would be effective for us in this fiscal year, but it will have no impact.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03: Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”). The update sets forth a requirement that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs is not affected by the amendments in this update. ASU 2015-03 would be effective for us in this fiscal year, but it will have no impact.
In August, 2015 , the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15 to clarify the SEC staff’s position on presenting and measuring debt issuance costs incurred in connection with line-of-credit arrangements given the lack of guidance on this topic in ASU 2015-03 - Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The SEC staff has announced that it would “not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement.” This will have no impact on us.
We have reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and we do not believe the future adoption of any such pronouncements may be expected to cause a material impact on our financial condition or the results of our operations.
7 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 2 – INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
September 30, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Grapes, bulk wine and capitalized cultural costs | $ | 7,993 | $ | 7,375 | ||||
Bottled wine, net | 15,731 | 14,003 | ||||||
Bottling materials and other | 385 | 544 | ||||||
Canned wine, net | 148 | 205 | ||||||
Total inventories, net | $ | 24,257 | $ | 22,127 |
Gross inventories are offset by a general reserve of $0.01 million and a reserve related to the CA Winecraft product of $0.5 million. The CA Winecraft reserve was established in the fourth quarter of FY15 and remains unchanged at September 30, 2015.
NOTE 3 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net
Property and equipment consists of the following:
September 30, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Land and land improvements | $ | 2,804 | $ | 2,804 | ||||
Building and improvements | 1,844 | 1,844 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment | 1,989 | 1,785 | ||||||
Vineyard development | 353 | 353 | ||||||
Vineyard equipment | 327 | 327 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 261 | 260 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements | 123 | 120 | ||||||
Vehicles | 93 | 93 | ||||||
7,794 | 7,586 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (1,915 | ) | (1,835 | ) | ||||
Total fixed assets | $ | 5,879 | $ | 5,751 |
Total depreciation expense for both three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $0.1 million.
NOTE 4 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
Intangible asset balances are summarized as follows:
September 30, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Finite lives: | ||||||||
Patents | $ | 44 | $ | 44 | ||||
44 | 44 | |||||||
Less accumulated amortization | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
43 | 43 | |||||||
Indefinite lives: | ||||||||
Trademarks | 442 | 438 | ||||||
Total intangible assets, net | $ | 485 | $ | 481 | ||||
8 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 4 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net, continued
Amortization expense of intangible assets was negligible in the first quarter of FY16 and $0.02 million for FY15. The expected future amortization of patents is $0.04 million. Patents are amortized from the time they are granted over the legal life of the patent.
NOTE 5 – OTHER ASSETS, net
Other assets consist of the following:
September 30, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Label design | $ | 387 | $ | 371 | ||||
Loan fees | 18 | 18 | ||||||
Lease costs | 23 | 23 | ||||||
Software | 170 | 151 | ||||||
Website design | 69 | 66 | ||||||
667 | 629 | |||||||
Less: accumulated amortization | (248 | ) | (222 | ) | ||||
Total other assets, net | $ | 419 | $ | 407 |
Future amortization of other assets is as follows:
Years ending June 30, | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
2016 (remaining nine months) | $ | 94 | ||
2017 | 115 | |||
2018 | 105 | |||
2019 | 61 | |||
2020 | 24 | |||
Thereafter | 6 | |||
Total future amortization | $ | 405 |
Total other assets, net includes amounts for assets capitalized, but not yet in service. The amount of these assets is the difference between the net amount and the total future amortization. Total amortization expense for other assets for both three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $0.03 million.
NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
In February 2011, we entered into a lease agreement for a tasting room and winery. The lease is for five years, commencing on March 1, 2011 and ending on February 29, 2016, and contains one option to extend for an additional period of five years. On July 27, 2015 we exercised the option to extend our lease of the property through February 29, 2021. We have the right of first refusal in the event the lessor desires to sell the leased property. Annual rent for the tasting room is $0.1 million, due monthly. The winery rent is subject to adjustment based on the actual number of cases produced each year; however, future payments are based on a minimum number of cases, as specified in the agreement. Beginning on September 1, 2012 and annually thereafter, tasting room and winery rent is increased by 3%. Lease expense is accounted for on a straight-line basis.
See Note 6 - Commitments and Contingencies, “Litigation”.
9 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, continued
In October 2013, we entered into a lease agreement for administrative office space. The lease commenced on October 15, 2013 and ends on October 31, 2016, and contains three one-year renewal options with adjustment to market rents.
Rent payments for these facilities for each three-month period ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, totaled $0.1 million.
Future lease commitments are as follows:
Years ending June 30, | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
2016 (remaining nine months) | $ | 253 | ||
2017 | 316 | |||
2018 | 310 | |||
2019 | 319 | |||
2020 | 329 | |||
Thereafter | 225 | |||
Total future rent payments | $ | 1,752 |
Future lease commitments include rent payments for the tasting room and winery through the term of the lease ending February 2021.
Credit Facilities and Long-Term Debt
Since June 30, 2015, there have been no material changes with respect to our credit facilities and our borrowings as disclosed in the “Notes to the Financial Statements – Commitments and Contingencies” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
The credit facilities, which mature on July 31, 2016, include (a) a revolving line of credit with a maximum commitment of $10.0 million which accrues interest at 2.25% above the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), (b) a capital equipment line with a maximum commitment of a $0.5 million which carries an interest rate of 2.25% above floating One-Month LIBOR, and (c) a foreign exchange facility with a maximum commitment of $0.1 million which allows to enter into any spot or forward transaction to purchase from or sell to our bank a foreign currency. We did not use the foreign exchange facility during the three-month period ended September 30, 2015.
The credit facilities are secured by a pledge of substantially all of our assets. Availability is subject to a monthly borrowing base and compliance with certain covenants, including, without limitation, a minimum current assets to current liabilities ratio (measured quarterly), a debt to effective tangible net worth ratio (measured quarterly) and a debt service coverage ratio (measured annually at our fiscal year end). The bank loans obtained on July 15, 2015 also include a minimum EBITDA covenant to be measured on December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016.
10 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, continued
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
September 30, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | |||||||||||
(in thousands except payment information) | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt: | ||||||||||||
Note 1 | (1 | ) | $ | 2,953 | $ | 2,987 | ||||||
Note 2 | (2 | ) | 8 | 21 | ||||||||
Note 3 | (3 | ) | 175 | 193 | ||||||||
Note 4 | (4 | ) | 306 | 326 | ||||||||
Note 5 | (5 | ) | 113 | 113 | ||||||||
Note 6 | (6 | ) | 481 | - | ||||||||
Total notes payable | 4,036 | 3,640 | ||||||||||
Less current maturities | (532 | ) | (368 | ) | ||||||||
Total long term debt | $ | 3,504 | $ | 3,272 |
(1) | Note payable to a bank, secured by a deed of trust on property, payable monthly with principal payments of $11,270 plus interest, matures May 31, 2022, variable interest of 2.25% above LIBOR. |
(2) | Note payable to a bank, secured by equipment, payable monthly with principal and interest payments of $4,226, matures November 1, 2015 at 3.75% interest. |
(3) | Note payable to a bank, secured by equipment, payable monthly with principal and interest payments of $6,535, matures January 15, 2018 at 3.75% interest. |
(4) | Note payable to a bank, secured by equipment, payable monthly with principal and interest payments of $7,783, matures March 1, 2019; at 3.75% interest. |
(5) | On November 30, 2014, we acquired the unrestricted use of the Stonegate trademark in exchange for a trademark release payment which is to be made over time and is accounted for as a note payable. The note payable has three equal installments: a) within five days of November 30, 2014, b) on October 31, 2015, and c) on July 31, 2016. The note does not accrue interest outstanding on the principal. An imputed interest rate of 5.5% was assessed under GAAP and the impact was considered immaterial. |
(6) | Note payable to a bank, secured by equipment, payable monthly with principal and interest payments of $11,267, matures July 1, 2019; at 3.90% interest. |
Future principal and interest payments for the long-term debt as of September 30, 2015 are as follows:
Years ending June 30, | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
2016 (remaining nine months) | $ | 372 | ||
2017 | 475 | |||
2018 | 396 | |||
2019 | 336 | |||
2020 | 146 | |||
Thereafter | 2,311 | |||
4,036 | ||||
Add: Estimated interest payments | 735 | |||
Total | $ | 4,771 |
11 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, continued
Supply Contract
At September 30, 2015, total future purchase commitments for finished goods total approximately $3.7 million and are expected to be fulfilled during fiscal 2016 to 2017.
We enter into short and long-term contracts with third parties and related party growers to supply a portion of our future grape and bulk wine inventory requirements. Future minimum grape and bulk wine inventory purchase commitments are as follows:
Years ending June 30, | Third Parties | Related Parties | Total | |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
2016 (remaining nine months) | $ | 2,398 | $ | - | $ | 2,398 | ||||||
2017 | 1,040 | 479 | 1,519 | |||||||||
2018 | 388 | 480 | 868 | |||||||||
2019 | 191 | 273 | 464 | |||||||||
Thereafter | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total | $ | 4,017 | $ | 1,232 | $ | 5,249 |
Our related party commitments were fulfilled during the first quarter of fiscal 2016; however, we may enter into new related party commitments in the ordinary course of business.
Production
We enter into various contracts with third party service providers for grape crushing and bottling. The costs are recorded in the period for which the service is provided. The actual costs related to custom crush services are based on volume. Our current contract for custom crush only covers the 2015 harvest. Our current bottling contract requires a minimum of 200,000 cases at $2.40 per case to be bottled in a one year period.
Guarantees
Since June 30, 2015, there have been no material changes with respect to our guarantees as disclosed in the “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Commitments and Contingencies” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
Litigation
From time to time, we may be subject to various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Other than discussed below, we are not aware of any current pending legal matters or claims, individually or in the aggregate, that are expected to have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
On October 21, 2015, H.D.D. LLC (“HDD”), the operating subsidiary of Truett Hurst, Inc. (the “Company”), received a letter from Hambrecht Wine Group, L.P. (the “Lessor”), the lessor of HDD’s winery and tasting room facility at 4035 Westside Road, Healdsburg, California, under a lease dated February 8, 2011 (the “Lease”), purporting to terminate the Lease effective as of that date, and rejecting HDD’s prior exercise of its election to extend for five years the original term of the Lease (which expires February 29, 2016). Lessor’s purported termination is based on purported defaults by HDD under provisions of the Lease relating to payment of rent and late charges (predicated on HDD’s withholding of approximately $33,000 in rent from several monthly rental payments in 2011, 2013 and 2014 due to a disagreement over the responsibility to provide water to the leased facility), the non-delivery by HDD of production reports and estimated production reports designed to determine whether additional rent was payable, and purported failure to comply with a provision of the Lease entitled “Assignment and Subletting.”
The Company intends to take all appropriate actions, including arbitration or litigation, to preserve its right to occupancy under the Lease for its full term, including the five year extension. No assurances can be made, however, that the Company will be successful in this effort. The loss of the lease could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
Exchange Agreement
Prior to the completion of the IPO, we entered into an exchange agreement with the existing owners of the LLC, several of whom are directors and/or officers. Under the exchange agreement, each existing owner (and certain permitted transferees thereof) may (subject to the terms of the exchange agreement), exchange their LLC Units for shares of Class A common stock of the Company on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and reclassifications, or for cash, at our election. As a holder exchanges their LLC Units, our interest in the LLC will be correspondingly increased. During FY15, certain members exchanged 0.2 million LLC units, on a one-for-one basis, for shares of Class A common stock of the Company, under the exchange agreement. There were no exchanges of LLC units during the first quarter of FY16.
Tax Receivable Agreement
We entered into a tax receivable agreement with the LLC unit holders which provides for payment by the Company to the LLC unit holders who convert their units to shares, an amount equal to 90% of the amount of the benefit, if any, that are realized as a result of (i) increases in tax basis associated with the election effected under Section 754 of the Code, and (ii) certain other tax benefits related to our entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the tax receivable agreement. Any payments under the tax receivable agreement will depend upon whether we have taxable income to utilize the benefit.
We will be required to pay the counterparties to the tax receivable agreement for certain tax benefits we may claim arising in connection with current exchanges, future purchases or exchanges of LLC Units and related transactions, and the amounts we may pay could be significant.
12 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, continued
H.D.D. LLC intends to make an election under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) effective for each taxable year in which an exchange of LLC Units for shares of Class A common stock as described above occurs, which may result in an adjustment to the tax basis of the assets of H.D.D. LLC at the time of an exchange of LLC Units. As a result of these exchanges, Truett-Hurst, Inc. will become entitled to a proportionate share of the existing tax basis of the assets of H.D.D. LLC. In addition, the purchase of Holdings Units and subsequent exchanges are expected to result in increases in the tax basis of the assets of H.D.D. LLC that otherwise would not have been available.
Both this proportionate share and these increases in tax basis may reduce the amount of tax that Truett-Hurst, Inc. would otherwise be required to pay in the future. These increases in tax basis may also decrease gains (or increase losses) on future dispositions of certain capital assets to the extent tax basis is allocated to those capital assets.
We recorded deferred tax assets of $6.4 million related to the exchange of 1.1 million LLC units for an equal amount of THI Class A common stock during FY14 and FY15. We recorded a $5.7 million long-term liability due to LLC unit holders who converted their units to shares which represents 90% of the estimated tax benefits and $0.6 million for the difference in the recorded deferred tax asset and computed TRA liability and recorded as an adjustment to equity. Additionally, we recorded a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets for $6.4 million as it was determined that it was more likely than not that the tax benefits would not be realized, which resulted in corresponding adjustments to the TRA liability and equity as mentioned above.
There was no activity related to the Tax Receivable Agreement in the three months ended September 30, 2015.
Indemnification
From time to time we enter into certain types of contracts that contingently require us to indemnify various parties against claims from third parties. These contracts primarily relate to (i) certain real estate leases, under which we may be required to indemnify property owners for environmental and other liabilities, and other claims arising from our use of the applicable premises, (ii) certain agreements with our officers, directors, and employees, under which we may be required to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their employment relationship, (iii) contracts under which we may be required to indemnify customers against third-party claims that our product infringes a patent, copyright, or other intellectual property right, and (iv) procurement or license agreements, under which we may be required to indemnify licensors or vendors for certain claims that may be brought against them arising from our acts or omissions with respect to the supplied products or technology.
Generally, a maximum obligation under these contracts is not explicitly stated thus an estimate of this potential obligation cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, we have not been required to make payments under these obligations, and no liabilities have been recorded at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, for these obligations on our balance sheets.
13 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 7 – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE and ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:
September 30, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 2,855 | $ | 2,969 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 658 | 290 | ||||||
Commission | 83 | 132 | ||||||
Depletion allowance | 509 | 525 | ||||||
Personnel | 282 | 242 | ||||||
Accrued grape purchases | 2,076 | - | ||||||
Professional fees | 68 | 18 | ||||||
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 6,531 | $ | 4,176 |
NOTE 8 – OUT OF DATE PRODUCT
In January 2015, we were notified by a large national retailer that inventory of Paper Boy product on their shelves had partially oxidized. Our terms of sale provide for limited return rights only in circumstances where products are not merchantable due to quality deficiencies. We determined that Paper Boy’s shelf life met quality specifications for the product, which are consistent with other similar products in the market, and, therefore, we did not have contractual obligation to accept returns of, or to replace, the product. However, on a one time basis we agreed to work with various impacted parties to remove the expired product. Consistent with ASC-450, Contingencies, which outlines accounting and disclosure requirements for loss and gain contingencies, we established an accrual for the estimated probable loss associated with our role in dealing with the out-of-date product, net of recoveries.
Since December 31, 2014 when the accrual was established, we have processed return credits of approximately $0.06 against the accrual for sales returns leaving an outstanding balance of $0.5 as of September 30, 2015.
NOTE 9 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Equity Incentive Plan
We have granted restricted stock awards and have the right to grant stock options and other stock-based awards to employees, directors and non-employees under our 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. For a complete discussion of 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, please refer to Note 13 - Stock-based Compensation to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the 2012 Plan has 0.4 million shares reserved for issuance and a total of 0.6 million granted equity incentive shares outstanding.
On February 4, 2013, we granted restricted stock to an independent contractor who serves as our Creative Director. The award vests over three years, and had a fair value at the date of grant of $0.9 million for a 5% interest in the LLC. We record the fair value and recognize the associated expense per FASB ASC Subtopic 505-50, Equity — Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees which defines the measurement date as the earlier of the date at which the commitment for performance is reached, or the date at which the performance is complete is the day that the fair value of the equity award is expensed. The grant date fair value of restricted stock awards, to non-employees, is recognized as compensation cost, on a straight-line basis over the three-year vesting period, and is subject to periodic market adjustments as the underlying equity instruments vests. As of September 30, 2015, the stock was valued at $0.7 million, we have recognized $0.7 million in cumulative expense and further expense may not be recognized related to the non-vested restricted stock award that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 0.35 years.
14 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, continued
On December 9, 2013, we granted 0.01 million shares of restricted stock to certain directors of our company which vests over three years and has a fair value at date of grant of $0.03 million. The fair value of restricted stock, measured on the date of grant using the price of the Company’s common stock on grant date, is recognized as compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the three-year vesting period. As of December 31, 2014, we reduced the vesting term to two years to match the director’s term. We have recognized $0.03 million in cumulative expense. At September 30, 2015, we had $0.004 million of unrecognized stock compensation expense related to the non-vested restricted stock award that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 0.19 years.
On June 25, 2014, we granted stock options to our Chief Financial Officer/Chief Operations Officer which vests over four years and had a fair value at date of grant of $0.4 million. We account for our employee stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes valuation model to measure stock option expense at the date of grant. The expected life assumptions for employee grants are based upon the simplified method, which averages the contractual term of the options of ten years with the average vesting term of four years for an average of six years. The risk-free interest rate is based on the expected U.S. Treasury rate over the expected life. Volatility reflects movements in our stock price over the most recent historical period equivalent to the expected life. The dividend yield assumption of zero is based upon the fact we have never paid cash dividends and presently have no intention of paying cash dividends in the future. The fair value of stock option grants is amortized to expense over the vesting period. The fair value of the stock options are recognized as compensation cost, on a straight-line basis over the four-year vesting period. As of September 30, 2015, we recognized $0.1 million of stock-based compensation expense and there was $0.3 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.74 years.
On June 25, 2014, we granted restricted stock units to our Chief Financial Officer/Chief Operations Officer which vest over four years and had a fair value at date of grant of $0.4 million. The grant date fair value of RSU awards is recognized as compensation cost, on a straight-line basis over the four-year vesting period. As of September 30, 2015, we recognized $0.1 million of stock-based compensation expense and there was $0.3 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.74 years.
On December 15, 2014, we granted 0.01 million shares of restricted stock to certain directors of our company which vest over one year and had a fair value at date of grant of $0.05 million. The fair value of restricted stock, measured on the date of grant using the price of the Company’s common stock on grant date, is recognized as compensation cost, on a straight-line basis over the one - year vesting period. As of September 30, 2015, we recognized $0.04 million in cumulative expense and had $0.01 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 0.21 years.
On December 15, 2014, we granted 0.008 million shares of restricted stock to a director of our company which vest over three years and had a fair value at date of grant of $0.03 million. The fair value of restricted stock, measured on the date of grant using the price of the Company’s common stock on grant date, is recognized as compensation cost, on a straight-line basis over the three - year vesting period. As of September 30, 2015, we recognized $0.008 of cumulative expense and had $0.02 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.21 years.
On April 8, 2015, we granted 0.07 million shares of stock options to an officer of H.D.D. LLC which vests over 4 years and has a fair value at date of grant of $0.1 million. We account for our employee stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes valuation model to measure stock option expense at the date of grant. The expected life assumptions for employee grants are based upon the simplified method, which averages the contractual term of the options of ten years with the average vesting term of four years for an average of six years. The risk-free interest rate is based on the expected U.S. Treasury rate over the expected life. Volatility reflects movements in our stock price over the most recent historical period equivalent to the expected life. The dividend yield assumption of zero is based upon the fact we have never paid cash dividends and presently have no intention of paying cash dividends in the future. The fair value of the stock option is recognized as compensation cost, on a straight-line basis over the four-year vesting period. As of September 30, 2015, we recognized $0.02 million in cumulative expense and had $0.1 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.52 years.
15 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, continued
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation included in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2015 | September 30, 2014 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 11 | $ | 83 | ||||
General and administrative | 75 | 55 | ||||||
$ | 86 | $ | 138 |
There were no grants of equity incentives during the first quarter of FY16.
NOTE 10 - NET LOSS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per common share:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2015 | September 30, 2014 | |||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to Truett-Hurst, Inc. | $ | (212 | ) | $ | (100 | ) | ||
Loss per share | ||||||||
Basic and dilutive Class A common share weighted average shares | 4,027,183 | 3,750,472 | ||||||
Basic and diluted loss per share | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) |
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to us, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by giving effect to all potential dilutive common shares, including convertible LLC units and equity incentive shares. The assumed exchange of 3.0 million LLC units for Class A common stock and the vesting of 0.6 million equity incentive shares have been excluded from the diluted loss per share because they are expected to have an anti-dilutive effect.
The shares of Class B common stock do not share in our earnings and therefore are not participating securities. Accordingly, basic and diluted net income per share of Class B common stock has not been presented.
NOTE 11 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The carrying amount reflected in the consolidated balance sheets of financial assets and liabilities, which includes cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximated their fair values due to the short term nature of these financial assets and liabilities. The carrying amount of our debt approximates its fair value based on prevailing interest rates and time to maturity.
In October 2012, we executed an interest rate swap obligation that was measured using observable inputs such as the LIBOR and Ten-year Treasury interest rates, and therefore has been categorized as Level 2. This derivative is not designated as a hedging instrument and has been recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of this instrument have been recognized in our consolidated statements of operations in other income (expense). The following tables set forth our interest rate swap fair values at September 30, 2015 and at June 30, 2015:
16 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 11 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, continued
Fair value measurements at reporting date | ||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Fair value as of September 30, 2015 | Significant other observable inputs | |||||||
(Level 2) | ||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Interest rate swap (1) | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (52 | ) | ||
Total | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (52 | ) |
(1) Included in “Accounts payable and accrued expenses” on the Balance Sheet
Fair value measurements at reporting date | ||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Fair value as of June 30, 2015 | Significant other observable inputs | |||||||
(Level 2) | ||||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Interest rate swap (2) | $ | 20 | $ | 20 | ||||
Total | $ | 20 | $ | 20 |
(2) Included in “Other current assets” on the Balance Sheet
NOTE 12 – TAXES
The effective tax rate for the first quarter of FY16 is 0% due to the company recording a full valuation allowance. In the three month period ended September 30, 2015, we had a tax benefit of $0.07 million against which we recorded a corresponding valuation allowance. The tax provision for the current year period is based on an estimate of our annualized income tax rate. Our effective tax rate includes a rate benefit attributable to the fact our subsidiaries operate as a limited liability company which is not subject to federal or state income tax. Accordingly, a portion of our earnings are not subject to corporate level taxes.
We had no unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2015 and did not incur any income tax related interest expense or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
NOTE 13 – SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMER INFORMATION, SEGMENT REPORTING AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Our primary reporting segments are identified by each distribution channel: wholesale, direct to consumer and internet. Wholesale sales include our retail exclusive brand label model and brands sold through the three-tier distribution system. Direct to consumer sales occur through our tasting rooms and wine clubs. Internet sales occur through Wine Spies and are principally comprised of brands not owned by us. Operating and other expenses are not allocated between operating segments; therefore, operating and net income information for the respective segments is not available. In addition, discreet financial information related to segment specific assets is not available. Sales and cost of sales are reported by segment.
Net Sales
The following tables reflect net sales, cost of sales and gross margin by segment for each of the three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2015 | September 30, 1014 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Net Sales | ||||||||
Wholesale | $ | 5,109 | $ | 4,138 | ||||
Direct to consumer | 1,261 | 1,060 | ||||||
Internet | 445 | 1,284 | ||||||
Total net sales | $ | 6,815 | $ | 6,482 |
17 |
TRUETT-HURST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 13 – SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMER INFORMATION, SEGMENT REPORTING AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION, continued
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2015 | September 30, 1014 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Cost of Sales | ||||||||
Wholesale | $ | 3,800 | $ | 3,000 | ||||
Direct to consumer | 420 | 373 | ||||||
Internet | 251 | 674 | ||||||
Total cost of sales | $ | 4,471 | $ | 4,047 |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2015 | September 30, 1014 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Gross Profit | ||||||||
Wholesale | $ | 1,309 | $ | 1,138 | ||||
Direct to consumer | 841 | 687 | ||||||
Internet | 194 | 610 | ||||||
Total cost of sales | $ | 2,344 | $ | 2,435 |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2015 | September 30, 1014 | |||||||
Gross Profit Percentage | ||||||||
Wholesale | 25.6 | % | 27.5 | % | ||||
Direct to consumer | 66.7 | % | 64.8 | % | ||||
Internet | 43.6 | % | 47.5 | % |
Significant Customer Information:
The following tables set forth concentrations of wholesale sales and accounts receivable as a percent of each total:
Net Sales for Three Months Ended | Accounts Receivable | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | as of September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Customer A | 25 | % | 42 | % | 25 | % | 38 | % | ||||||||
Customer B | 36 | % | 23 | % | 39 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||
Customer C | 1 | % | - | 10 | % | 20 | % |
International sales were $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
We have evaluated all subsequent event activity through the issue date of these condensed consolidated financial statements and concluded that no additional subsequent events, except as discussed in Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies, have occurred that would require recognition in the condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
18 |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, prospects, plans, opportunities, and objectives constitute “forward-looking statements.” The words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “potential,” or “continue” and similar types of expressions identify such statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These statements are based upon information that is currently available to us and or management’s current expectations, speak only as of the date hereof, and are subject to risks and uncertainties. We expressly disclaim any obligation, except as required by federal securities laws, or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change or expectations with regard thereto or to reflect any change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such forward-looking statement is based, in whole or in part. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to, a reduction in the supply of grapes and bulk wine available to us; significant competition; any change in our relationships with retailers which could harm our business; we may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future; the loss of key employees; a reduction in our access to, or an increase in the cost of, the third-party services we use to produce our wine; credit facility restrictions on our current and future operations; failure to protect, or infringement of, trademarks and proprietary rights; these factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. Risks that may affect our operating results include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2015 filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on September 28, 2015. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2015 and in other documents that we file from time to time with the SEC.
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of Truett-Hurst, Inc. and its subsidiaries: H.D.D. LLC (“LLC”) and its consolidated subsidiary, The Wine Spies, LLC (“Wine Spies”) (collectively, “we,” “Truett-Hurst” “our,” “us,” or “the Company”) and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the general instructions for quarterly reports filed on Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. The disclosures do not include all the information necessary for audited financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 filed with the SEC on September 28, 2015. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Unless otherwise indicated, the Notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements relate to the discussion of our continuing operations. Our condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all of our accounts, including those of our controlled subsidiaries and the portion of equity in a consolidated subsidiary that is not attributable to us, directly or indirectly, is presented as noncontrolling interests.
Quantities or results referred to as “to date” or “as of this date” mean as of or to September 30, 2015, unless otherwise specifically noted. References to “FY” or “fiscal year” refer to our fiscal year ending on June 30th of the designated year.
19 |
OVERVIEW OF BUSINESS
General
We produce and sell premium, super-premium, and ultra-premium wines and other select beverage alcohol products made from wine. The wine we make generally comes from grapes purchased from California-based growers. In addition, we purchase semi-finished bulk wine under contract and opportunistically on the spot-market. On a more limited basis, we also purchase finished goods from both foreign and domestic producers. We are headquartered in Sonoma County, California with tasting rooms in the Dry Creek and Russian River valleys. Our wines include Pinot Noir, Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Zinfandel, Petite Sirah, Merlot, and Cabernet Sauvignon and are sold across a number of price points via three distinct distribution channels: three-tier, direct to consumer and internet. Our business model is a combination of direct to consumer sales, traditional three-tier brand sales and retail exclusive brand sales. We own, design and develop our brands, including those developed and sold on a retailer exclusive basis. Our brands are differentiated and marketed through innovative packaging and label designs.
Wine sales in the three-tier channel are sold to distributors with programs available to the broad market or to specific retailers on an exclusive basis. Our traditional three-tier distribution business consists of sales of Truett-Hurst, VML, Healdsburg Ranches, Colby Red and Bradford Mountain branded wines. Through our retailer exclusive brand model we work with our retail partners to develop innovative brands which resonate with their customers and are intended to increase store traffic and expand exclusive brand sales. Our retail exclusive model allows us to own the brands we create, which we believe differentiates us from the traditional private label model, and allows us the option of expanding the brands into national and international markets, thereby increasing sales and building our brand equity. Our direct to consumer channel consists of sales through our tasting rooms, wine clubs and via the internet.
Strategic Objectives
There are three primary categories into which we sell our wine: premium ($12 - $14 per bottle retail price), super-premium ($15 - $24 per bottle retail price), and ultra-premium ($25 - $49 per bottle retail price). We believe we can benefit from growth at the premium and above price points and continue to grow our business relying on our competitive strengths: our experienced and knowledgeable team; our relationships with the world’s top wine distributors and retailers; and our innovative approach to distribution and brand development. We intend to continue growing by:
· | Developing innovative retail exclusive products that meet the needs of wine retailers. We have a reputation for developing innovative retail exclusive brands and working with our retailer partners on unique programs to support sales of those products. With our branding expertise we intend to continue innovation and build our market share with global wine retailers who are focused on increasing their profitability through retail exclusive offerings. |
· | Growing our customer base to include additional major U.S. retail chains. We are actively pursuing relationships with the largest retail chains in the United States and have further diversified our customer base, thereby reducing customer concentration risk. |
· | Expanding our direct to consumer business. Our wine clubs continue to grow due to growing consumer awareness of our brands from targeted public relations, exciting wine club events and advertising. The direct to consumer business generally generates higher gross margins and we intend to continue building this distribution channel in order to further our growth. |
· | Marketing to key international markets. During FY14, we completed an agreement with the Trialto Wine Group, LTD, based in Vancouver Canada, creating a national partnership to distribute the Truett-Hurst family of brands throughout Canada. We also continue selective brand development and distribution opportunities in other international markets. |
· | Developing new ways to engage customers and to distribute our products. We continue to be discovery-oriented in our approach and we are always looking for new innovations in and approaches to the global wine market. We believe that traditional wine marketing, to some degree, has stymied creativity and believe our innovative branding expertise allows us to rapidly capitalize on evolving customer demands. |
20 |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Factors Affecting Our Operating Results
Our net sales are affected by advertising, discounts and promotions, merchandising, packaging and in the wholesale segment, the availability of display space at our retailer customers, all of which have a significant impact on consumers’ buying decisions. Continued growth of our net sales and profits will depend, substantially, on the continued popularity of our new and existing brands, our ability to effectively manage our sales by channel, and our ability to maintain sufficient product supply to meet expected growth in demand.
Our cost of sales for the wholesale and direct to consumer segments includes wine-related inputs, such as grapes and semi-finished bulk wine, bottling materials, such as bottles, capsules, corks and labeling materials, labor and overhead expenses, including inbound and outbound freight, and barrel depreciation. The internet segment cost of sales is comprised of finished cased wine.
Comparison of the Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
Net Sales
The following table compares net sales by distribution channel:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | Increase (Decrease) |
% Change | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Distribution Channel | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale | $ | 5,109 | $ | 4,138 | $ | 971 | 23.5 | % | ||||||||
Direct to consumer | 1,261 | 1,060 | 201 | 19.0 | % | |||||||||||
Internet | 445 | 1,284 | (839 | ) | -65.3 | % | ||||||||||
Total net sales | $ | 6,815 | $ | 6,482 | $ | 333 | 5.1 | % |
Net sales increased to $6.8 million for the first quarter of FY16 from $6.5 million for the first quarter of FY15, an increase of $0.3 million.
Wholesale net sales increased 23.5% in the first quarter of FY16 compared to prior-year’s first quarter period. The increase in wholesale net sales was due to organic growth of certain of our brands as well as adding new retail exclusive products with our customers. Direct to consumer net sales increased 19.0% in the first quarter of FY16 compared to prior-year’s first quarter period. The increase in direct to consumer net sales was primarily due to our continued efforts to grow the channel through wine club sales and tasting room sales. Internet net sales decreased 65.3% for the first quarter of FY16 compared to the prior-year’s first quarter period. The internet net sales decrease was attributable to the loss of a key partnership during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015. We anticipate that the near term run rate for net sales in the internet segment will continue to be below sales in the prior year periods.
International net sales were $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
We record sales discounts and depletion allowances as a reduction of sales at the time of sale. For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, sales discounts and depletion allowances totaled $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
Cost of Sales
The following table compares cost of sales by distribution channel:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | Increase (Decrease) |
% Change | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Distribution Channel | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale | $ | 3,800 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 800 | 26.7 | % | ||||||||
Direct to consumer | 420 | 373 | 47 | 12.6 | % | |||||||||||
Internet | 251 | 674 | (423 | ) | -62.8 | % | ||||||||||
Total cost of sales | $ | 4,471 | $ | 4,047 | $ | 424 | 10.5 | % |
21 |
Our cost of sales increase for the first quarter of FY16 compared to the first quarter of FY15 was attributable to the related increase in sales and sales mix. Total cost of sales increase was 10.5% compared to net sales increase of 5.1% for the first quarter of FY16. The change in internet cost of sales was attributable to decreased unit sales volume.
Gross Profit / Gross Profit Margin
The following table compares gross profit and gross profit margins by distribution channel:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | Increase (Decrease) | % Change | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Gross Profit | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale | $ | 1,309 | $ | 1,138 | $ | 171 | 15.0 | % | ||||||||
Direct to consumer | 841 | 687 | 154 | 22.4 | % | |||||||||||
Internet | 194 | 610 | (416 | ) | -68.2 | % | ||||||||||
Total cost of sales | $ | 2,344 | $ | 2,435 | $ | (91 | ) | -3.7 | % |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2015 | September 30, 1014 | |||||||
Gross Profit Percentage | ||||||||
Wholesale | 25.6 | % | 27.5 | % | ||||
Direct to consumer | 66.7 | % | 64.8 | % | ||||
Internet | 43.6 | % | 47.5 | % |
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of non-production personnel costs, advertising and other marketing promotions. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $0.05 million and $0.03 million, respectively. Sales and marketing expenses consist of the following:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | Increase (Decrease) | % Change | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 1,581 | $ | 1,565 | $ | 16 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of net sales | 23.2 | % | 24.1 | % |
Sales and marketing expenses were flat in the first quarter of FY16 compared to the prior-year’s first quarter period.
We report the amounts billed to our customers for shipping and handling as sales, and we report the costs we incur for shipping and handling as a sales and marketing expense. For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, shipping costs were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
22 |
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses include the costs associated with our administrative staff and other expenses related to our non-manufacturing functions. General and administrative expenses consist of the following:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | Increase (Decrease) | % Change | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | $ | 910 | $ | 943 | $ | (33 | ) | -3.5 | % | |||||||
Percentage of net sales | 13.4 | % | 14.5 | % |
General and administrative expense decreased 3.5% for the first quarter of FY16 compared to the prior-year’s first quarter period. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributed to lower legal, consulting, and other professional fees offset by higher wages expenses including stock based compensation.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $0.08 million and $0.04 million for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
General
Our primary sources of available cash are from operations, our credit facilities and equity offerings. Our primary cash needs are to fund working capital requirements (primarily inventory), capital expenditures for barrels and other equipment to facilitate increased production, repay our indebtedness (interest and principal payments) and operating expenses. We are able to borrow against our working capital assets (accounts receivable and inventory) via an asset based bank loan.
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | Increase (Decrease) | % Change | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Working capital | $ | 12,872 | $ | 14,920 | $ | (2,048 | ) | -13.7 | % | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,769 | $ | 4,752 | $ | (1,983 | ) | -41.7 | % |
The credit facilities, which mature on July 31, 2016, include (a) a revolving line of credit with a maximum commitment of $10.0 million which accrues interest at 2.25% above the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), (b) a capital equipment line with a maximum commitment of a $0.5 million which carries an interest rate of 2.25% above floating One-Month LIBOR, and (c) a foreign exchange facility with a maximum commitment of $0.1 million which allows us to enter into any spot or forward transaction to purchase from or sell to our bank a foreign currency. We did not use the foreign exchange facility during the three month period ended September 30, 2015.
23 |
The outstanding balances on the components of the credit facilities are:
September 30, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Credit Facilities | ||||||||
Line of credit | $ | 9,915 | $ | 8,534 | ||||
Equipment line of credit | 80 | 500 | ||||||
Total credit facilities | $ | 9,995 | $ | 9,034 |
The credit facilities are collateralized by substantially all of our assets. Availability is subject to a monthly borrowing base and compliance with certain covenants, including, without limitation, a minimum current assets to current liabilities ratio (measured quarterly), a debt to effective tangible net worth ratio (measured quarterly), a debt service coverage ratio (measured annually) and minimum EBITDA (measured at December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016). We were in compliance in all material aspects with all such covenants at September 30, 2015.
We believe that our cash position, net cash provided by operating activities in coming periods, and our current credit facilities will be adequate to finance working capital and operations needs for at least the next twelve months. We may, however, require additional liquidity as we continue to execute our business strategy. We anticipate that to the extent that we require additional liquidity, it will be funded through the incurrence of indebtedness, additional equity financings or a combination of these potential sources of liquidity, although no assurance can be given that such forms of capital will be available to us at all, or if available on terms which are acceptable to us, at such time.
Cash Flows
September 30, 2015 | September 30, 2014 | |||||||||||
in thousands | Inc (Dec) | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 33 | $ | (679 | ) | $ | 712 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | $ | (300 | ) | $ | (423 | ) | $ | 123 | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | 1,357 | $ | 287 | $ | 1,070 |
Operating Activities
Net cash related to operating activities increased $0.7 million from a decrease in cash of $(0.7) million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2015. The significant changes in cash flows used in operating activities is attributable to the net loss, increase in inventories, increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses and an increase in accounts receivable. Due to the seasonal nature of the harvest, our first fiscal quarter requires an increase in working capital which is not typically required in subsequent quarters of a given fiscal year.
Investing Activities
Net cash used related to investing activities increased $0.1 million from a decrease in cash of $(0.4) million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2015 The changes in cash flows used in investing activities was attributable to an increase in property and equipment purchases which are primarily barrels used to age wine.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities increased $1.1 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2015 compared to the net cash provided by financing activities of $0.3 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2014. The significant change in cash flows provided by financing activities is attributable to proceeds from borrowings from an increased revolving line of credit.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Financing Agreements
Our primary sources of indebtedness are loans provided by our bank. Since June 30, 2015, there have been no material changes with respect to our loans or guarantees as disclosed in the “Notes to the Financial Statements – Commitments and Contingencies” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. We were in compliance in all material aspects with all covenants at September 30, 2015.
24 |
Concentration of Credit Risk and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We maintain our cash with highly rated credit institutions. Although we try to limit the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution, we do in the normal course of business maintain cash balances in excess of federally insured limits.
Our accounts receivable consists primarily of trade receivables from customers. We review accounts receivable regularly and make estimates for an allowance when there is doubt as to the collectability of individual balances. Our accounts receivable credit risk is not concentrated within any one geographic area or customer group. We believe our accounts receivable credit risk exposure is limited and we have not experienced material charge offs.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have off-balance sheet risks related to foreign exchange contracts, option contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements.
We lease a winery, tasting room facility, office space and certain office equipment. We enter into short and long-term contracts to supply a portion of our future grapes and bulk wine inventory requirements with third parties and related party growers. The following table presents future minimum inventory commitments as of September 30, 2015:
Years ending June 30, | Third Parties | Related Parties | Total | |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
2016 (remaining nine months) | $ | 2,398 | $ | - | $ | 2,398 | ||||||
2017 | 1,040 | 479 | 1,519 | |||||||||
2018 | 388 | 480 | 868 | |||||||||
2019 | 191 | 273 | 464 | |||||||||
Thereafter | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total | $ | 4,017 | $ | 1,232 | $ | 5,249 |
Our related party commitments were fulfilled during the first quarter of fiscal 2016; however, we may enter into new related party commitments in the ordinary course of business.
At September 30, 2015, total future purchase commitments for finished goods total approximately $3.7 million and are expected to be fulfilled during fiscal 2016 to 2017.
Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices
Our results of operations and financial condition have not been materially affected by inflation and changing prices. We intend to pass along rising costs through increased selling prices, subject to normal competitive conditions. There can be no assurances, however, that we will be able to pass along rising costs through increased selling prices effectively. In addition, we continue to identify on-going cost savings initiatives.
25 |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, or ASU 2014-15, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASU 2014-15 applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-05: Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement (“ASU 2015-05”). The amendments in this update provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the update specifies that the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. The update further specifies that the customer should account for a cloud computing arrangement as a service contract if the arrangement does not include a software license. ASU 2015-05 would be effective for us in this fiscal year, but it will have no impact.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03: Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”). The update sets forth a requirement that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs is not affected by the amendments in this update. ASU 2015-03 would be effective for us in this fiscal year, but it will have no impact.
In August, 2015 , the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15 to clarify the SEC staff’s position on presenting and measuring debt issuance costs incurred in connection with line-of-credit arrangements given the lack of guidance on this topic in ASU 2015-03 - Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The SEC staff has announced that it would “not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement.” This will have no impact on us.
We have reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and we do not believe the future adoption of any such pronouncements may be expected to cause a material impact on our financial condition or the results of our operations.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this Item.
26 |
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provide reasonable assurance, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and were effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosure.
Changes to Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance due to its inherent limitations: it is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human or other failures. A control system also can be circumvented in various ways, including, without limitation, by collusion or improper management override. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of such limitations, disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting cannot prevent or detect all misstatements, including, without limitation, unintentional errors or fraud. Because these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process, it is possible to design and implement process safeguards to reduce such risk, however, such risk cannot be completely eliminated. As such, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all misstatements, including without limitation, unintentional errors and fraud.
27 |
We may be subject to various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business from time to time. Other than the matter discussed below, we are not aware of any current pending legal matters or claims, individually or in the aggregate, that are expected to have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
On October 21, 2015, H.D.D. LLC (“HDD”), the operating subsidiary of Truett Hurst, Inc. (the “Company”), received a letter from Hambrecht Wine Group, L.P. (the “Lessor”), the lessor of HDD’s winery and tasting room facility at 4035 Westside Road, Healdsburg, California, under a lease dated February 8, 2011 (the “Lease”), purporting to terminate the Lease effective as of that date, and rejecting HDD’s prior exercise of its election to extend for five years the original term of the Lease (which expires February 29, 2016). Lessor’s purported termination is based on purported defaults by HDD under provisions of the Lease relating to payment of rent and late charges (predicated on HDD’s withholding of approximately $33,000 in rent from several monthly rental payments in 2011, 2013 and 2014 due to a disagreement over the responsibility to provide water to the leased facility), the non-delivery by HDD of production reports and estimated production reports designed to determine whether additional rent was payable, and purported failure to comply with a provision of the Lease entitled “Assignment and Subletting.”
The Company intends to take all appropriate actions, including arbitration or litigation, to preserve its right to occupancy under the Lease for its full term, including the five year extension. No assurances can be made, however, that the Company will be successful in this effort. The loss of the lease could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
There have been no material changes in information regarding our risk factors as described in Item 1A of our Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on September 28, 2015.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
28 |
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
29 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Healdsburg, State of California, on the 13 day of November, 2015.
TRUETT-HURST, INC. | ||
/s/ Phillip L. Hurst | November 13, 2015 | |
Phillip L. Hurst President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||
/s/ Paul Forgue | November 13, 2015 | |
Paul Forgue Chief Financial Officer & Chief Operations Officer (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer) |
30 |