e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended
June 30, 2011
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Transition Period
From to
|
001-33289
Commission File Number
ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
N/A
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
P.O. Box HM
2267
Windsor Place,
3rd
Floor
18 Queen Street
Hamilton HM JX
Bermuda
(Address of principal executive
office, including zip code)
(441) 292-3645
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 4, 2011, the registrant had outstanding 13,707,427
voting ordinary shares and 749,869 non-voting convertible
ordinary shares, each par value $1.00 per share.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share
data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments,
available-for-sale,
at fair value (amortized cost: 2011 $ nil
2010 $7,209)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,263
|
|
Short-term investments, trading, at fair value
|
|
|
325,036
|
|
|
|
507,978
|
|
Fixed maturities,
available-for-sale,
at fair value (amortized cost: 2011 $817,284;
2010 $1,068,540)
|
|
|
852,810
|
|
|
|
1,094,947
|
|
Fixed maturities, trading, at fair value
|
|
|
1,093,134
|
|
|
|
524,122
|
|
Equities, trading, at fair value
|
|
|
65,890
|
|
|
|
60,082
|
|
Other investments, at fair value
|
|
|
255,619
|
|
|
|
234,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
2,592,489
|
|
|
|
2,429,106
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
759,724
|
|
|
|
799,154
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
512,792
|
|
|
|
656,200
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
20,765
|
|
|
|
19,980
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
17,928
|
|
|
|
24,790
|
|
Income taxes recoverable
|
|
|
6,357
|
|
|
|
7,968
|
|
Reinsurance balances receivable
|
|
|
1,004,111
|
|
|
|
961,442
|
|
Funds held by reinsured companies
|
|
|
230,973
|
|
|
|
274,699
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
21,222
|
|
|
|
21,222
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
34,400
|
|
|
|
41,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
5,200,761
|
|
|
$
|
5,235,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
3,267,341
|
|
|
$
|
3,291,275
|
|
Reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
224,266
|
|
|
|
231,435
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
41,998
|
|
|
|
94,390
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
5,455
|
|
|
|
50,075
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
205,636
|
|
|
|
245,278
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
109,826
|
|
|
|
107,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
3,854,522
|
|
|
|
4,020,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized, issued and fully paid, par value $1 each (authorized
2011: 156,000,000; 2010: 156,000,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares (issued and outstanding 2011: 13,519,723;
2010:12,940,021)
|
|
|
13,520
|
|
|
|
12,940
|
|
Non-voting convertible ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A (issued 2011: 2,972,892; 2010: 2,972,892)
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
Series B, C and D (issued and outstanding 2011: 749,869;
2010: nil)
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares at cost (Series A non-voting convertible
ordinary shares 2011: 2,972,892; 2010: 2,972,892)
|
|
|
(421,559
|
)
|
|
|
(421,559
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
774,637
|
|
|
|
667,907
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
50,336
|
|
|
|
35,017
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
664,021
|
|
|
|
651,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Enstar Group Limited Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
1,084,678
|
|
|
|
948,421
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
261,561
|
|
|
|
267,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
1,346,239
|
|
|
|
1,215,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
5,200,761
|
|
|
$
|
5,235,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
1
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
For the Three and Six Month Periods Ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting fees
|
|
$
|
2,045
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
6,081
|
|
|
$
|
17,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
22,928
|
|
|
|
22,998
|
|
|
|
41,470
|
|
|
|
49,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
(4,227
|
)
|
|
|
8,632
|
|
|
|
(2,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on bargain purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,237
|
|
|
|
22,271
|
|
|
|
69,288
|
|
|
|
64,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses
|
|
|
(27,829
|
)
|
|
|
(35,104
|
)
|
|
|
(30,441
|
)
|
|
|
(37,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in provisions for bad debt
|
|
|
(1,672
|
)
|
|
|
(7,768
|
)
|
|
|
(1,672
|
)
|
|
|
(13,107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
(11,783
|
)
|
|
|
(11,696
|
)
|
|
|
(23,320
|
)
|
|
|
(20,661
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
6,969
|
|
|
|
12,202
|
|
|
|
17,046
|
|
|
|
18,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,315
|
)
|
|
|
(42,366
|
)
|
|
|
(38,387
|
)
|
|
|
(51,962
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
16,723
|
|
|
|
14,254
|
|
|
|
27,105
|
|
|
|
29,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
28,211
|
|
|
|
15,801
|
|
|
|
45,961
|
|
|
|
26,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
5,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign exchange losses (gains)
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
(5,615
|
)
|
|
|
9,266
|
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,248
|
|
|
|
(15,121
|
)
|
|
|
47,608
|
|
|
|
10,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND SHARE OF NET EARNINGS OF PARTLY
OWNED COMPANY
|
|
|
15,989
|
|
|
|
37,392
|
|
|
|
21,680
|
|
|
|
53,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(975
|
)
|
|
|
(16,115
|
)
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
(22,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
SHARE OF NET EARNINGS OF PARTLY OWNED COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS
|
|
|
15,014
|
|
|
|
23,480
|
|
|
|
20,088
|
|
|
|
41,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(5,639
|
)
|
|
|
(11,050
|
)
|
|
|
(7,210
|
)
|
|
|
(12,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED
|
|
$
|
9,375
|
|
|
$
|
12,430
|
|
|
$
|
12,878
|
|
|
$
|
28,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE BASIC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Enstar Group Limited ordinary
shareholders
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE DILUTED:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Enstar Group Limited ordinary
shareholders
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
13,999,179
|
|
|
|
13,702,832
|
|
|
|
13,475,418
|
|
|
|
13,661,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
14,285,685
|
|
|
|
14,019,489
|
|
|
|
13,755,623
|
|
|
|
13,925,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
2
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
For the
Three and Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2011 and
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS
|
|
$
|
15,014
|
|
|
$
|
23,480
|
|
|
$
|
20,088
|
|
|
$
|
41,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments arising during
the period
|
|
|
5,839
|
|
|
|
(6,412
|
)
|
|
|
14,575
|
|
|
|
(5,652
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for net realized and unrealized
(gains) losses included in net earnings
|
|
|
(5,264
|
)
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
(8,632
|
)
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
Decrease in defined benefit pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
10,049
|
|
|
|
(22,688
|
)
|
|
|
12,255
|
|
|
|
(17,116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
10,624
|
|
|
|
(24,873
|
)
|
|
|
18,470
|
|
|
|
(20,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
25,638
|
|
|
|
(1,393
|
)
|
|
|
38,558
|
|
|
|
20,353
|
|
Less comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(7,846
|
)
|
|
|
(3,965
|
)
|
|
|
(10,361
|
)
|
|
|
(7,125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED
|
|
$
|
17,792
|
|
|
$
|
(5,358
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,197
|
|
|
$
|
13,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Share Capital Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
12,940
|
|
|
$
|
13,581
|
|
Issue of shares
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Share awards granted/vested
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
13,520
|
|
|
$
|
13,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital Series A Non-Voting
Convertible Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning and end of period
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital Series B, C and D Non-Voting
Convertible Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Preferred shares converted
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital Preference Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Issue of shares
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares converted
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning and end of period
|
|
$
|
(421,559
|
)
|
|
$
|
(421,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
667,907
|
|
|
$
|
721,120
|
|
Share awards granted/vested
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
5,286
|
|
Issue of shares and warrants, net
|
|
|
105,310
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
Amortization of share awards
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
774,637
|
|
|
$
|
727,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Attributable to Enstar
Group Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
35,017
|
|
|
$
|
8,709
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
9,152
|
|
|
|
(12,103
|
)
|
Net movement in unrealized holdings gains (losses) on investments
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
|
|
(3,022
|
)
|
Decrease in defined benefit pension liability
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
50,336
|
|
|
$
|
(6,416
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
651,143
|
|
|
$
|
477,057
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Enstar Group Limited
|
|
|
12,878
|
|
|
|
28,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
664,021
|
|
|
$
|
505,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
267,400
|
|
|
$
|
274,271
|
|
Return of capital
|
|
|
(16,200
|
)
|
|
|
(13,579
|
)
|
Contribution of capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,742
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
7,210
|
|
|
|
12,745
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
3,103
|
|
|
|
(5,013
|
)
|
Net movement in unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
261,561
|
|
|
$
|
289,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
4
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
For
the Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2011 and
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
20,088
|
|
|
$
|
41,096
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash flows used in
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on bargain purchase
|
|
|
(13,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share of undistributed net earnings of partly owned company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,353
|
)
|
Net realized and unrealized investment (gain) loss
|
|
|
(8,632
|
)
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
Share of net gain from other investments
|
|
|
(6,863
|
)
|
|
|
(9,410
|
)
|
Other items
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
(1,155
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
Amortization of bond premiums and discounts
|
|
|
8,866
|
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
Net movement of trading securities held on behalf of
policyholders
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
23,306
|
|
Sales and maturities of trading securities
|
|
|
630,961
|
|
|
|
64,695
|
|
Purchases of trading securities
|
|
|
(980,455
|
)
|
|
|
(755,925
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance balances receivable
|
|
|
(40,238
|
)
|
|
|
(68,415
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
60,005
|
|
|
|
(104,969
|
)
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(41,924
|
)
|
|
|
166,148
|
|
Reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
(7,412
|
)
|
|
|
11,284
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(52,667
|
)
|
|
|
(24,558
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(44,937
|
)
|
|
|
(33,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in operating activities
|
|
|
(472,741
|
)
|
|
|
(695,643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(7,949
|
)
|
|
|
157,184
|
|
Sales and maturities of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
261,977
|
|
|
|
54,872
|
|
Purchase of
held-to-maturity
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(608,680
|
)
|
Maturity of
held-to-maturity
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,810
|
|
Movement in restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
143,408
|
|
|
|
87,052
|
|
Funding of other investments
|
|
|
(23,581
|
)
|
|
|
(66,245
|
)
|
Redemption of bond funds
|
|
|
12,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of investment in partly owned company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,400
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by investing activities
|
|
|
386,093
|
|
|
|
115,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of shares
|
|
|
105,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of capital to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(16,200
|
)
|
|
|
(13,579
|
)
|
Contribution to surplus of subsidiary by noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,742
|
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
Receipt of loans
|
|
|
167,650
|
|
|
|
21,400
|
|
Repayment of loans
|
|
|
(207,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities
|
|
|
50,137
|
|
|
|
29,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT
|
|
|
(2,919
|
)
|
|
|
7,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(39,430
|
)
|
|
|
(542,710
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
799,154
|
|
|
|
1,266,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
759,724
|
|
|
$
|
723,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
55,927
|
|
|
$
|
41,089
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
3,848
|
|
|
$
|
5,738
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
5
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(Tabular information expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars
except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
BASIS OF
PREPARATION AND CONSOLIDATION
|
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements
have not been audited. These statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for
interim financial information and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of management, these financial
statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
of the Companys financial position and results of
operations as at the end of and for the periods presented.
Results of operations for subsidiaries acquired are included
from the dates of their acquisition by the Company. The results
of operations for any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of the results for a full year. Inter-company
accounts and transactions have been eliminated. In these notes,
the terms we, us, our, or
the Company refer to Enstar Group Limited and its
direct and indirect subsidiaries. The following information
should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Adoption
of New Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the new
guidance issued by the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB), which provides additional guidance for
performing Step 1 of the test for goodwill impairment when an
entity has reporting units with zero or negative carrying
values. As of June 30, 2011, none of the Companys
reporting units were at risk of failing Step 1 of the test for
goodwill impairment. Under the new guidance, Step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test must be performed when adverse
qualitative factors indicate that goodwill is more likely than
not impaired. The adoption of the revised guidance did not have
a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the new
guidance issued by FASB, which specifies that if a public entity
presents comparative financial statements, the entity should
disclose, in its supplementary pro-forma information, revenue
and earnings of the combined entity as though the business
combination that occurred during the current year had occurred
as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting
period only. The adoption of the revised guidance did not have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In May 2011, FASB issued amendments to disclosure requirements
for common fair value measurement. These amendments, effective
for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after
December 15, 2011 (early adoption is prohibited), result in
a common definition of fair value and common requirements for
measurement of and disclosure requirements under U.S. GAAP
and International Financial Reporting Standards. Consequently,
the amendments change some fair value measurement principles and
disclosure requirements. The implementation of this amended
accounting guidance is not expected to have a material impact on
the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, FASB issued amendments to disclosure requirements
for presentation of comprehensive income. This guidance,
effective retrospectively for the interim and annual periods
beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is
permitted), requires presentation of total comprehensive income,
the components of net income, and the components of other
comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive
statements. The implementation of this amended accounting
guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
6
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
1.
|
BASIS OF
PREPARATION AND
CONSOLIDATION (contd)
|
The Company has determined that all other recently issued
accounting pronouncements do not apply to its operations.
The Company accounts for acquisitions using the purchase method
of accounting, which requires that the acquirer record the
assets and liabilities acquired at their estimated fair value.
The fair values of reinsurance assets and liabilities acquired
are derived from probability weighted ranges of the associated
projected cash flows, based on actuarially prepared information
and managements run-off strategy. Any amendment to the
fair values resulting from changes in such information or
strategy will be recognized when the changes occur.
Laguna
On March 25, 2011, the Company, through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Kenmare Holdings Ltd., completed the acquisition of
Laguna Life Limited, formerly known as CitiLife Financial
Limited (Laguna), from Citigroup Insurance Holding
Corporation (Citigroup), an affiliate of Citigroup
Inc. Laguna is an Ireland-based life insurer that is in run-off.
The purchase price was 15.0 million (approximately
$21.2 million) and was funded from available cash on hand.
The previously disclosed purchase price of
30.0 million (approximately $42.4 million) was
reduced, prior to completion of the acquisition, after Citigroup
received approval from Lagunas regulator to distribute
15.0 million (approximately $21.2 million) to
its shareholders.
The purchase price and fair value of the assets acquired in the
Laguna acquisition were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
21,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired at fair value
|
|
$
|
34,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of net assets over purchase price (gain on bargain
purchase)
|
|
$
|
(13,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gain on bargain purchase of approximately
$13.1 million, relating to the acquisition of Laguna, arose
primarily as a result of the reassessment by the Company, upon
acquisition, of the total required estimated costs to manage the
business to expiry. The Companys assessment of costs was
lower than the acquired costs recorded by the vendor in the
financial statements of Laguna.
The following summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
13,274
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments, trading
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
Fixed maturities, trading
|
|
|
30,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
31,919
|
|
Reinsurance balances receivable
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(11,898
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired at fair value
|
|
$
|
34,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From March 25, 2011, the date of acquisition, to
June 30, 2011, the Company has recorded $0.7 million
in revenues and $nil net earnings related to Laguna in its
consolidated statement of earnings.
7
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
ACQUISITIONS (contd)
|
Clarendon
On July 12, 2011, the Company, through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Clarendon Holdings, Inc., completed the acquisition
of 100% of the shares of Clarendon National Insurance Company
(Clarendon) from Clarendon Insurance Group, Inc., an
affiliate of Hannover Re. Clarendon is a New Jersey-domiciled
insurer that is in run-off. Clarendon owns three other insurers,
two domiciled in New Jersey and one domiciled in Florida, that
are also in run-off. The purchase price was $219.1 million
and was financed in part by $106.5 million from a four-year
term loan facility provided by National Australia Bank Limited
(NAB) and the remainder from available cash on hand.
The accounting for this business combination has not been
completed at the time of issuance of these financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
SIGNIFICANT
NEW BUSINESS
|
Shelbourne RITC Transactions
In December 2007, the Company, in conjunction with JCF FPK I
L.P. (JCF FPK) and a newly-hired executive
management team, formed U.K.-based Shelbourne Group Limited
(Shelbourne) to invest in Reinsurance to Close or
RITC transactions (the transferring of liabilities
from one Lloyds syndicate to another) with Lloyds of
London insurance and reinsurance syndicates in run-off. The
Company owns approximately 56.8% of Shelbourne, which in turn
owns 100% of Shelbourne Syndicate Services Limited, the Managing
Agency for Lloyds Syndicate 2008, a syndicate approved by
Lloyds of London on December 16, 2007 to undertake
RITC transactions with Lloyds syndicates in run-off.
JCF FPK is a joint investment program between Fox-Pitt, Kelton,
Cochran, Caronia & Waller (USA) LLC (FPK)
and J.C. Flowers II, L.P. (the Flowers Fund). The
Flowers Fund is a private investment fund advised by J.C.
Flowers & Co. LLC. J. Christopher Flowers, one of the
Companys largest shareholders and formerly a member of the
Companys board of directors, is the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of J.C. Flowers & Co. LLC. In
addition, an affiliate of the Flowers Fund controlled
approximately 41% of FPK until its sale of FPK in December 2009.
In February 2011, Lloyds Syndicate 2008 entered into RITC
agreements with two Lloyds syndicates with total gross
insurance reserves of approximately $129.6 million. The
capital commitment to Lloyds Syndicate 2008 with respect
to these two RITC agreements amounted to £21.3 million
(approximately $34.1 million), which was fully funded by
the Company from available cash on hand.
|
|
4.
|
RESTRICTED
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents were $512.8 million
and $656.2 million as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. The restricted cash and
cash equivalents are used as collateral against letters of
credit and as guarantees under trust agreements. Letters of
credit are issued to ceding insurers as security for the
obligations of insurance subsidiaries under reinsurance
agreements with those ceding insurers.
8
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Available-for-sale
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of the
Companys fixed maturity securities and short-term
investments classified as
available-for-sale
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Non-OTTI
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
36,618
|
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,280
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
182,641
|
|
|
|
12,617
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
195,205
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
541,111
|
|
|
|
19,515
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
560,181
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
17,059
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
17,300
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
14,681
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
17,419
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
25,174
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
25,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
817,284
|
|
|
$
|
36,552
|
|
|
$
|
(1,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
852,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Non-OTTI
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
65,115
|
|
|
$
|
766
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
65,789
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
248,487
|
|
|
|
8,832
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
257,005
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
695,372
|
|
|
|
16,513
|
|
|
|
(1,615
|
)
|
|
|
710,270
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
20,036
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
20,107
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
19,667
|
|
|
|
2,083
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
21,739
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
27,072
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
27,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,749
|
|
|
$
|
29,073
|
|
|
$
|
(2,612
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,102,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
The following tables summarize the Companys fixed maturity
securities and short-term investments classified as
available-for-sale
in an unrealized loss position as well as the aggregate fair
value and gross unrealized loss by length of time the security
has continuously been in an unrealized loss position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
7,013
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,013
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,364
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
6,364
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
36,228
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
18,402
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
54,630
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
11,307
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
11,345
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
10,662
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
4,936
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
15,598
|
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,210
|
|
|
$
|
(539
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,378
|
|
|
$
|
(487
|
)
|
|
$
|
96,588
|
|
|
$
|
(1,026
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,976
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,777
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
7,710
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
31,128
|
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
38,838
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
22,039
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
107,735
|
|
|
|
(1,297
|
)
|
|
|
129,774
|
|
|
|
(1,615
|
)
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
11,274
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
13,642
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
10,554
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,641
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,002
|
|
|
$
|
(874
|
)
|
|
$
|
174,716
|
|
|
$
|
(1,738
|
)
|
|
$
|
218,718
|
|
|
$
|
(2,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the number
of securities classified as
available-for-sale
in an unrealized loss position was 74 and 136, respectively,
with a fair value of $96.6 million and $218.7 million,
respectively. Of these securities, the number of securities that
had been in an unrealized loss position for twelve months or
longer was 46 and 32, respectively. As of June 30, 2011,
none of these securities were considered to be other than
temporarily impaired. The Company has no intent to sell and it
is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to
sell these securities before their fair values recover above the
adjusted cost. The unrealized losses from these securities were
not as a result of credit, collateral or structural issues.
The contractual maturities of the Companys fixed maturity
securities and short-term investments classified as
available-for-sale
are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
10
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
346,170
|
|
|
$
|
356,636
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
%
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
407,730
|
|
|
|
428,877
|
|
|
|
50.3
|
%
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
3,589
|
|
|
|
3,934
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
2,881
|
|
|
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760,370
|
|
|
|
792,666
|
|
|
|
93.0
|
%
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
17,059
|
|
|
|
17,300
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
14,681
|
|
|
|
17,419
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
25,174
|
|
|
|
25,425
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
817,284
|
|
|
$
|
852,810
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
373,683
|
|
|
$
|
379,203
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
625,463
|
|
|
|
643,252
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
%
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
5,307
|
|
|
|
5,539
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
4,521
|
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008,974
|
|
|
|
1,033,064
|
|
|
|
93.7
|
%
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
20,036
|
|
|
|
20,107
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
19,667
|
|
|
|
21,739
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
27,072
|
|
|
|
27,300
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,749
|
|
|
$
|
1,102,210
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the
credit ratings (provided by major rating agencies) of the
Companys fixed maturity securities and short-term
investments classified as
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
295,445
|
|
|
$
|
313,744
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
211,064
|
|
|
|
219,468
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
A
|
|
|
257,740
|
|
|
|
264,831
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
%
|
BBB or lower
|
|
|
52,655
|
|
|
|
54,254
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Not Rated
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
817,284
|
|
|
$
|
852,810
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
405,682
|
|
|
$
|
416,526
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
267,917
|
|
|
|
273,500
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
A
|
|
|
332,401
|
|
|
|
341,447
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
%
|
BBB or lower
|
|
|
69,359
|
|
|
|
70,274
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Not Rated
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,749
|
|
|
$
|
1,102,210
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
The estimated fair values of the Companys investments in
fixed maturity securities, short-term investments and equities
classified as trading securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
174,422
|
|
|
$
|
162,014
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
188,942
|
|
|
|
129,861
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
927,237
|
|
|
|
637,114
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
77,713
|
|
|
|
82,399
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
37,638
|
|
|
|
17,102
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
10,619
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
65,890
|
|
|
|
60,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,484,060
|
|
|
$
|
1,092,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the
credit ratings (provided by major rating agencies) of the
Companys fixed maturity securities and short-term
investments classified as trading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
542,416
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
265,877
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
A
|
|
|
509,512
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
%
|
BBB or lower
|
|
|
76,713
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Not Rated
|
|
|
23,652
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,418,170
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
395,881
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
177,302
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
A
|
|
|
400,314
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
BBB or lower
|
|
|
51,983
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Not Rated
|
|
|
6,620
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,032,100
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Investments
The estimated fair values of the Companys other
investments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Private equities
|
|
$
|
118,682
|
|
|
$
|
104,109
|
|
Bond funds
|
|
|
106,779
|
|
|
|
102,279
|
|
Hedge fund
|
|
|
23,884
|
|
|
|
22,037
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,274
|
|
|
|
6,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
255,619
|
|
|
$
|
234,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company
had $118.7 million and $104.1 million, respectively,
of other investments recorded in private equities, which
represented 3.1% and 2.4% of total investments and cash and cash
equivalents at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. All of the Companys investments in private
equities are subject to restrictions on redemptions and sales
that are determined by the governing documents and limit the
Companys ability to liquidate these investments in the
short term. Due to a lag in the valuations reported by the
managers, the Company records changes in the investment value
with up to a three-month lag. These investments are accounted
for at estimated fair value determined by the Companys
proportionate share of the net asset value of the investee
reduced by any impairment charges. As at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the Company had unfunded capital
commitments relating to its other investments of
$74.5 million and $84.7 million, respectively. See
Note 12 for details of other investments with related
parties.
Our bond fund holdings comprise a number of positions in
diversified bond mutual funds managed by third-party managers.
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment Process
The Company assesses whether declines in the fair value of its
fixed maturity investments classified as
available-for-sale
represent impairments that are
other-than-temporary
by reviewing each fixed maturity investment that is impaired
and: (1) determining if the Company has the intent to sell
the fixed maturity investment or (2) determining if it is
more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell
the fixed maturity investment before its anticipated recovery;
and (3) assessing whether a credit loss exists, that is,
where the Company expects that the present value of the cash
flows expected to be collected from the fixed maturity
investment is less than the amortized cost basis of the
investment.
The Company had no planned sales of its fixed maturity
investments classified as
available-for-sale
as at June 30, 2011. In assessing whether it is more likely
than not that the Company will be required to sell a fixed
maturity investment before its anticipated recovery, the Company
considers various factors including its future cash
13
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
flow requirements, legal and regulatory requirements, the level
of its cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and fixed
maturity investments classified as
available-for-sale
in an unrealized gain position, and other relevant factors. For
the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company did not
recognize any
other-than-temporary
impairments due to required sales.
In evaluating credit losses, the Company considers a variety of
factors in the assessment of a fixed maturity investment
including: (1) the time period during which there has been
a significant decline below cost; (2) the extent of the
decline below cost and par; (3) the potential for the fixed
maturity investment to recover in value; (4) an analysis of
the financial condition of the issuer; (5) the rating of
the issuer; and (6) failure of the issuer of the fixed
maturity investment to make scheduled interest or principal
payments.
Based on the factors described above, the Company determined
that, as at June 30, 2011, no credit losses existed.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the price at which to sell an asset or
transfer a liability (i.e. the exit price) in an
orderly transaction between market participants. The Company
uses a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to
quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to
unobservable data. The hierarchy is broken down into three
levels as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuations based on unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Company has the ability to access. Valuation
adjustments and block discounts are not applied to Level 1
instruments.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuations based on quoted prices in
active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices
for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or for
which significant inputs are observable (e.g. interest rates,
yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities,
etc.) or can be corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are
unobservable and significant to the overall fair value
measurement. The unobservable inputs reflect the Companys
own assumptions about assumptions that market participants might
use.
|
The following is a summary of valuation techniques or models the
Company uses to measure fair value by asset and liability
classes.
Fixed Maturity Investments
The Companys fixed maturity portfolio is managed by the
Companys Chief Investment Officer and outside investment
advisors. The Company uses inputs from nationally recognized
pricing services, including pricing vendors, index providers and
broker-dealers to estimate fair value measurements for all of
its fixed maturity investments. These pricing services include
FT Interactive Data, Barclays Capital Aggregate Index (formerly
Lehman Index), Reuters Pricing Service and others.
In general, the pricing services use observable market inputs
including, but not limited to, investment yields, credit risks
and spreads, benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities,
non-binding broker-dealer quotes, reported trades and sector
groupings to determine the fair value. In addition, pricing
services use valuation models, such as an Option Adjusted Spread
model, to develop prepayment and interest rate scenarios. The
Option Adjusted Spread model is commonly used to estimate fair
value for securities such as mortgage-backed and asset backed
securities.
14
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
The following describes the techniques generally used to
determine the fair value of the Companys fixed maturities
by asset class.
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency securities consist of securities
issued by the U.S. Treasury and mortgage pass- through
agencies such as the Federal National Mortgage Association, the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and other agencies. The
significant inputs include the spread above the risk-free yield
curve, reported trades and broker-dealer quotes. These are
considered to be observable market inputs and, therefore, the
fair values of these securities are classified within
Level 2.
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. government
securities consist of bonds issued by
non-U.S. governments
and agencies along with supranational organizations. The
significant inputs include the spread above the risk-free yield
curve, reported trades and broker-dealer quotes. These are
considered to be observable market inputs and, therefore, the
fair values of these securities are classified within
Level 2.
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities consist primarily of investment-grade debt
of a wide variety of corporate issuers and industries. The fair
values of these securities are determined using the spread above
the risk-free yield curve, reported trades, broker-dealer
quotes, benchmark yields, and industry and market indicators.
These are considered observable market inputs and, therefore,
the fair values of these securities are classified within
Level 2. Where pricing is unavailable from pricing
services, the Company obtains non-binding quotes from
broker-dealers. This is generally the case when there is a low
volume of trading activity and current transactions are not
orderly. In this event, securities are classified within
Level 3. As at June 30, 2011, the Company had one
corporate security classified as Level 3.
|
|
|
|
Municipal securities consist primarily of bonds issued by
U.S.-domiciled
state and municipal entities. The fair values of these
securities are determined using the spread above the risk-free
yield curve, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes and benchmark
yields. These are considered observable market inputs and,
therefore, the fair values of these securities are classified
within Level 2.
|
|
|
|
Asset backed securities consist primarily of investment-grade
bonds backed by pools of loans with a variety of underlying
collateral. The significant inputs used to determine the fair
value of these securities include the spread above the risk-free
yield curve, reported trades, benchmark yields, broker-dealer
quotes, prepayment speeds, and default rates. These are
considered observable market inputs and, therefore, the fair
values of these securities are classified within Level 2.
|
|
|
|
Residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities include
both agency and non-agency originated securities. The
significant inputs used to determine the fair value of these
securities include the spread above the risk-free yield curve,
reported trades, benchmark yields, broker-dealer quotes,
prepayment speeds, and default rates. These are considered
observable market inputs and, therefore, the fair values of
these securities are classified within Level 2. Where
pricing is unavailable from pricing services, the Company
obtains non-binding quotes from broker-dealers. This is
generally the case when there is a low volume of trading
activity and current transactions are not orderly. In this
event, securities are classified within Level 3. As at
June 30, 2011, the Company had one commercial
mortgage-backed security classified as Level 3.
|
To validate the techniques or models used by the pricing
services, the Company compares the fair value estimates to its
knowledge of the current market and challenges any prices deemed
not to be representative of fair value.
As of June 30, 2011, there were no material differences
between the prices obtained from the pricing services and the
fair value estimates developed by the Company.
15
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
Equity Securities
The Companys equity securities are managed by two external
advisors. The Company uses nationally recognized pricing
services, including pricing vendors, index providers and
broker-dealers to estimate fair value measurements for all of
its equity securities. These pricing services include FT
Interactive Data and others.
The Company has categorized all of its investments in common
stock as Level 1 investments because the fair values of
these securities are based on quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities. The Company has categorized
all of its investments in preferred stock as Level 2
(except one which was categorized as Level 3) because
their fair value estimates are based on observable market data.
As at June 30, 2011 the Company did not have any
investments in preferred stock categorized as Level 2.
Other Investments
For its investments in private equities, the Company measures
fair value by obtaining the most recently published net asset
value as advised by the external fund manager or third-party
administrator. The use of net asset value as an estimate of the
fair value for investments in certain entities that calculate
net asset value is a permitted practical expedient. The
Companys private equity investments are mainly in the
financial services industry. The fund advisors continue to
evaluate the overall market environment, as well as specific
areas in the financial services sector, in order to identify
segments they believe will offer the most attractive investment
opportunities. The financial statements of each fund generally
are audited annually under U.S. GAAP, using fair value
measurement for the underlying investments. For all
publicly-traded companies within the funds, the Company has
valued those investments based on the latest share price. The
value of Affirmative Investment LLC (in which the Company owns a
non-voting 7% membership interest) is based on the market value
of the shares of Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc., a
publicly-traded company.
All of the Companys investments in private equities are
subject to restrictions on redemptions and sales that are
determined by the governing documents and limit the
Companys ability to liquidate those investments in the
short term. These restrictions have been in place since the
initial investments. The capital commitments are discussed in
detail in Note 12 to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements. The Company has classified private
equities as Level 3 investments because they reflect the
Companys own judgment about the assumptions that market
participants might use.
For its investment in the hedge fund, the Company measures fair
value by obtaining the most recently published net asset value
as advised by the external fund manager or third-party
administrator. The use of net asset value as an estimate of the
fair value for investments in certain entities that calculate
net asset value is a permitted practical expedient. The adviser
of the fund intends to seek attractive risk-adjusted total
returns for the funds investors by acquiring, originating,
and actively managing a diversified portfolio of debt
securities, with a focus on various forms of asset backed
securities and loans. The fund will focus on investments that
the adviser believes to be fundamentally undervalued with
current market prices that are believed to be compelling
relative to intrinsic value. The units of account that are
valued by the Company are its interests in the fund and not the
underlying holdings of such fund. Thus, the inputs used by the
Company to value its investment in the fund may differ from the
inputs used to value the underlying holdings of such fund. The
hedge fund is not currently eligible for redemption due to
imposed
lock-up
periods of three years from the time of the initial investment.
Once eligible, redemptions will be permitted quarterly with
90 days notice. There are no unfunded capital commitments
in relation to the hedge fund. The investment in the fund is
classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
The bond funds in which the Company invests have been classified
as Level 2 investments because their fair value is
estimated using the net asset value reported by Bloomberg and
they have daily liquidity.
16
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
Fair
Value Measurements
In accordance with the provisions of the Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures topic of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification, the Company has categorized its investments that
are recorded at fair value among levels as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
211,702
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
211,702
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,147
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,486,875
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
1,487,418
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,013
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,048
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
55,057
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,044
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
61,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,431
|
|
|
|
65,890
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,779
|
|
|
|
148,840
|
|
|
|
255,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
61,459
|
|
|
$
|
2,377,207
|
|
|
$
|
153,823
|
|
|
$
|
2,592,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
227,803
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
227,803
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,866
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,346,854
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
1,347,384
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,506
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,927
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
38,841
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,613
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
56,369
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
3,575
|
|
|
|
60,082
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,279
|
|
|
|
132,435
|
|
|
|
234,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
56,369
|
|
|
$
|
2,235,283
|
|
|
$
|
137,454
|
|
|
$
|
2,429,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for all investments measured at fair value
on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs during the three
months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of April 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
139,962
|
|
|
$
|
3,975
|
|
|
$
|
145,450
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,407
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(1,043
|
)
|
|
|
(1,617
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,660
|
)
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) through earnings
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
4,626
|
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
|
$
|
148,840
|
|
|
$
|
4,431
|
|
|
$
|
153,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of net gains/(losses) for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 included in earnings attributable to the fair
value of changes in assets still held at June 30, 2011 was
$3.9 million. Of this amount, $0.5 million was
included in net realized and unrealized gains and
$3.4 million was included in net investment income.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for all investments measured at fair value
on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs during the three
months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of April 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,336
|
|
|
$
|
91,294
|
|
|
$
|
3,450
|
|
|
$
|
96,080
|
|
Net purchases (sales and distributions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,197
|
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) through earnings
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
$
|
104,079
|
|
|
$
|
3,238
|
|
|
$
|
108,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of net gains/(losses) for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 included in earnings attributable to the fair
value of changes in assets still held at June 30, 2010 was
$1.5 million. Of this amount, $(0.2) million was
included in net realized and unrealized gains and
$1.7 million was included in net investment income.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for all investments measured at fair value
on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs during the six
months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of January 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
|
$
|
132,435
|
|
|
$
|
3,575
|
|
|
$
|
137,454
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,564
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(1,043
|
)
|
|
|
(1,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,709
|
)
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) through earnings
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
7,507
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
8,514
|
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
|
$
|
148,840
|
|
|
$
|
4,431
|
|
|
$
|
153,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENTS (contd)
|
The amount of net gains/(losses) for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 included in earnings attributable to the fair
value of changes in assets still held at June 30, 2011 was
$6.4 million. Of this amount, $1.0 million was
included in net realized and unrealized gains and
$5.4 million was included in net investment income.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for all investments measured at fair value
on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs during the six
months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
81,801
|
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
85,742
|
|
Net purchases (sales and distributions)
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
16,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,825
|
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) through earnings
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
6,144
|
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
$
|
104,079
|
|
|
$
|
3,238
|
|
|
$
|
108,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of net gains/(losses) for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 included in earnings attributable to the fair
value of changes in assets still held at June 30, 2010 was
$9.4 million. Of this amount, $0.1 million was
included in net realized and unrealized gains and
$9.3 million was included in net investment income.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
proceeds from the sales and maturities of
available-for-sale
securities were $262.0 million and $54.9 million,
respectively. Gross realized gains on the sale of
available-for-sale
securities were, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and
gross realized losses on the sale of
available-for-sale
securities, were $0.3 million and $nil, respectively. Net
unrealized gains and (losses) on trading securities were
$3.1 million and $(2.5) million as at June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively.
Restricted
Investments
The Company is required to maintain investments on deposit with
various regulatory authorities to support its insurance and
reinsurance operations. The investments on deposit are available
to settle insurance and reinsurance liabilities. The Company
also utilizes trust accounts to collateralize business with its
insurance and reinsurance counterparties. These trust accounts
generally take the place of letter of credit requirements. The
investments held in trust as collateral are primarily highly
rated fixed maturity securities. The carrying value of the
Companys restricted investments as of June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Assets used for collateral in trust for third-party agreements
|
|
$
|
486,955
|
|
|
$
|
371,834
|
|
Deposits with regulatory authorities
|
|
|
35,317
|
|
|
|
33,970
|
|
Others
|
|
|
62,939
|
|
|
|
62,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
585,211
|
|
|
$
|
468,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS
|
In October 2010, the Company entered into a foreign currency
forward exchange contract as part of its overall foreign
currency risk management strategy. On the value date,
June 30, 2011, the Company sold Australian Dollars
(AU$) 45.0 million for $42.5 million. The
contract exchange rate was AU$1 for $0.9439. On June 15,
2011, the Company effectively closed out the contract by
entering into a forward exchange contract, with a value date of
19
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
June 30, 2011, where it bought AU$45.0 million for
$48.0 million. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, the change in the fair value of the contract
was $(1.5) million and $(1.9) million, the effect of
which the Company has recognized as a foreign exchange loss
included as part of its net earnings.
|
|
7.
|
REINSURANCE
BALANCES RECEIVABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Recoverable from reinsurers on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding losses
|
|
$
|
454,402
|
|
|
$
|
425,336
|
|
Losses incurred but not reported
|
|
|
140,248
|
|
|
|
141,118
|
|
Fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(38,276
|
)
|
|
|
(41,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
556,374
|
|
|
|
525,440
|
|
Paid losses
|
|
|
447,737
|
|
|
|
436,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,004,111
|
|
|
$
|
961,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value adjustment, determined on acquisition of
reinsurance subsidiaries, was based on the estimated timing of
loss and loss adjustment expense recoveries and an assumed
interest rate equivalent to a risk free rate for securities with
similar duration to the reinsurance receivables acquired plus a
spread to reflect credit risk, and is amortized over the
estimated recovery period, as adjusted for accelerations on
commutation settlements, using the constant yield method.
The Companys acquired reinsurance subsidiaries, prior to
acquisition, used retrocessional agreements to reduce their
exposure to the risk of reinsurance assumed. The Company remains
liable to the extent that retrocessionaires do not meet their
obligations under these agreements, and therefore, the Company
evaluates and monitors concentration of credit risk among its
reinsurers. Provisions are made for amounts considered
potentially uncollectible.
At June 30, 2011, the Companys top 10 reinsurers
accounted for 73.9% (December 31, 2010: 75.5%) of
reinsurance recoverables (which includes loss reserves
recoverable and recoverables on paid losses) and included
$101.5 million of incurred but not reported
(IBNR) recoverable (December 31, 2010:
$99.6 million). Reinsurance recoverables by reinsurer were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Recoverable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Recoverable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Top 10 reinsurers
|
|
$
|
741,837
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
726,201
|
|
|
|
75.5
|
%
|
Other reinsurers balances > $1 million
|
|
|
242,424
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
198,737
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
Other reinsurers balances < $1 million
|
|
|
19,850
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
36,504
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,004,111
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
961,442
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the provision
for uncollectible reinsurance relating to losses recoverable was
$421.5 million and $381.4 million, respectively. To
estimate the provision for uncollectible reinsurance
recoverables, the reinsurance recoverables are first allocated
to applicable reinsurers. This determination is based on a
detailed process rather than an estimate, although an element of
judgment is applied. As part of this process, ceded IBNR is
allocated by reinsurer.
20
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
REINSURANCE
BALANCES RECEIVABLE (contd)
|
The Company uses a detailed analysis to estimate uncollectible
reinsurance. The primary components of the analysis are
reinsurance recoverable balances by reinsurer and bad debt
provisions applied to these balances to determine the portion of
a reinsurers balance deemed to be uncollectible. These
provisions require considerable judgment and are determined
using the current rating, or rating equivalent, of each
reinsurer (in order to determine their ability to settle the
reinsurance balances), as well as other key considerations and
assumptions, such as claims and coverage issues.
As at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, reinsurance
receivables with a carrying value of $405.4 million and
$398.8 million, respectively, were each associated with two
reinsurers which represented 10% or more of total reinsurance
balances receivable. As at June 30, 2011, the two
reinsurers had credit ratings of AA- or higher. In the event
that all or any of the reinsuring companies are unable to meet
their obligations under existing reinsurance agreements, the
Company will be liable for such defaulted amounts.
|
|
8.
|
LOSSES
AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES
|
The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and
ending reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Losses incurred
and paid are reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance as at April 1
|
|
$
|
3,394,988
|
|
|
$
|
2,890,723
|
|
Less: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
583,478
|
|
|
|
435,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,811,510
|
|
|
|
2,455,043
|
|
Effect of exchange rate movement
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
|
|
(26,454
|
)
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
(34,315
|
)
|
|
|
(42,366
|
)
|
Net losses paid
|
|
|
(65,208
|
)
|
|
|
(47,863
|
)
|
Retroactive reinsurance contracts assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance as at June 30
|
|
|
2,710,967
|
|
|
|
2,472,489
|
|
Plus: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
556,374
|
|
|
|
421,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at June 30
|
|
$
|
3,267,341
|
|
|
$
|
2,894,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the components of the movement in the
net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net losses paid
|
|
$
|
(65,208
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,863
|
)
|
Net reduction in case and loss adjustment expense reserves
|
|
|
65,074
|
|
|
|
53,718
|
|
Net reduction in IBNR
|
|
|
27,963
|
|
|
|
29,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses
|
|
|
27,829
|
|
|
|
35,104
|
|
Reduction in provisions for bad debt
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
7,768
|
|
Reduction in provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
11,783
|
|
|
|
11,696
|
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(6,969
|
)
|
|
|
(12,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
$
|
34,315
|
|
|
$
|
42,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
LOSSES
AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT
EXPENSES (contd)
|
Net reduction in case and loss adjustment expense reserves, or
LAE reserves, comprises the movement during the quarter in
specific case reserve liabilities as a result of claims
settlements or changes advised to the Company by its
policyholders and attorneys, less changes in case reserves
recoverable advised by the Company to its reinsurers as a result
of the settlement or movement of assumed claims. Net reduction
in IBNR represents the change in the Companys actuarial
estimates of losses incurred but not reported.
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2011 of
$34.3 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $27.8 million, a reduction in
provisions for bad debt of $1.7 million and a reduction in
provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense liabilities
of $11.8 million, relating to 2011 run-off activity,
partially offset by the amortization, over the estimated payout
period, of fair value adjustments relating to companies acquired
amounting to $7.0 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$27.8 million, comprised of net incurred loss development
of $0.1 million and reductions in IBNR reserves of
$28.0 million, primarily related to the completion of two
commutations of the Companys largest ten exposures. The
reductions in provisions for bad debt of $1.7 million
resulted from the collection of receivables against which bad
debt provisions had been provided for in earlier periods.
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2010 of
$42.4 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $35.1 million, a reduction in
provisions for bad debt of $7.8 million and a reduction in
provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense liabilities
of $11.7 million, relating to 2010 run-off activity,
partially offset by the amortization, over the estimated payout
period, of fair value adjustments relating to companies acquired
amounting to $12.2 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$35.1 million comprised net favorable incurred loss
development of $5.9 million along with reductions in IBNR
reserves of $29.2 million. Subsequent to June 30,
2010, claims liabilities of certain policyholders within a
number of the Companys insurance and reinsurance
subsidiaries were commuted at levels that required the reduction
in IBNR reserves for those subsidiaries. The reductions in
provisions for bad debt of $7.8 million resulted from the
collection of receivables against which bad debt provisions had
been provided for in earlier periods.
The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and
ending reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Losses incurred
and paid are reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance as at January 1
|
|
$
|
3,291,275
|
|
|
$
|
2,479,136
|
|
Less: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
525,440
|
|
|
|
347,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,765,835
|
|
|
|
2,131,408
|
|
Effect of exchange rate movement
|
|
|
33,352
|
|
|
|
(62,429
|
)
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
(38,387
|
)
|
|
|
(51,962
|
)
|
Net losses paid
|
|
|
(153,339
|
)
|
|
|
(131,088
|
)
|
Acquired on purchase of subsidiaries
|
|
|
10,439
|
|
|
|
222,042
|
|
Retroactive reinsurance contracts assumed
|
|
|
93,067
|
|
|
|
364,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance as at June 30
|
|
|
2,710,967
|
|
|
|
2,472,489
|
|
Plus: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
556,374
|
|
|
|
421,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at June 30
|
|
$
|
3,267,341
|
|
|
$
|
2,894,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
LOSSES
AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT
EXPENSES (contd)
|
The following table shows the components of the movement in the
net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net losses paid
|
|
$
|
(153,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
(131,088
|
)
|
Net reduction in case and LAE reserves
|
|
|
148,504
|
|
|
|
132,572
|
|
Net reduction in IBNR
|
|
|
35,276
|
|
|
|
35,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses
|
|
|
30,441
|
|
|
|
37,046
|
|
Reduction in provisions for bad debt
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
13,107
|
|
Reduction in provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
23,320
|
|
|
|
20,661
|
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(17,046
|
)
|
|
|
(18,852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
$
|
38,387
|
|
|
$
|
51,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 of
$38.4 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $30.4 million, a reduction in
provisions for bad debt of $1.7 million and a reduction in
provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense liabilities
of $23.3 million, relating to 2011 run-off activity,
partially offset by the amortization, over the estimated payout
period, of fair value adjustments relating to companies acquired
amounting to $17.0 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$30.4 million, comprised of net incurred loss development
of $4.8 million and reductions in IBNR reserves of
$35.3 million, primarily related to the completion of two
commutations of the Companys largest ten exposures. The
reductions in provisions for bad debt of $1.7 million
resulted from the collection of receivables against which bad
debt provisions had been provided for in earlier periods.
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 of
$52.0 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $37.0 million, a reduction in
provisions for bad debt of $13.1 million and a reduction in
provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense liabilities
of $20.7 million, relating to 2010 run-off activity,
partially offset by the amortization, over the estimated payout
period, of fair value adjustments relating to companies acquired
amounting to $18.9 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$37.0 million comprised net favorable incurred loss
development of $1.5 million and reductions in IBNR reserves
of $35.6 million. Subsequent to June 30, 2010, claims
liabilities of certain policyholders within a number of the
Companys insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries were
commuted at levels that required the reduction in IBNR reserves
for those subsidiaries. The reductions in provisions for bad
debts of $13.1 million resulted from the collection of
receivables against which bad debt provisions had been provided
for in earlier periods.
The Companys long-term debt consists of loan facilities
used to partially finance certain of the Companys
acquisitions or significant new business transactions along with
a loan outstanding in relation to the share repurchase
agreements (the Repurchase Agreements) entered into
with three of its executives and certain trusts and a
corporation affiliated with the executives. The Unionamerica,
Knapton and Enstar Group Facilities and the Repurchase
Agreements are described in Note 11 to the consolidated
financial statements contained in the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
23
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
LOANS
PAYABLE (contd)
|
Total amounts of loans payable outstanding, including accrued
interest, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
totaled $205.6 million and $245.3 million,
respectively, and were comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
Date of Facility
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
EGL Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
167,650
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Unionamerica Facility A
|
|
December 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,259
|
|
Unionamerica Facility B
|
|
December 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Knapton
|
|
April 20, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,532
|
|
Enstar Group Facility A
|
|
December 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,100
|
|
Enstar Group Facility B
|
|
December 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term bank debt
|
|
|
|
|
167,650
|
|
|
|
207,945
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
October 1, 2010
|
|
|
37,986
|
|
|
|
37,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans payable
|
|
|
|
$
|
205,636
|
|
|
$
|
245,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EGL
Revolving Credit Facility; Prepayment of Certain Subsidiary Debt
Facilities
On June 13, 2011, the Company, as borrower, and certain of
its subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a Revolving Credit
Facility Agreement with NAB and Barclays Corporate, the
corporate banking division of Barclays Bank PLC, as bookrunners
and mandated lead arrangers, certain financial institutions, as
lenders, and NAB as agent (the EGL Credit
Agreement). The EGL Credit Agreement provides for a
three-year revolving credit facility pursuant to which the
Company is permitted to borrow up to an aggregate of
$250.0 million (the EGL Revolving Credit
Facility), which will be available to prepay certain
existing credit facilities of the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries, to fund permitted acquisitions and for general
corporate purposes. The Companys ability to draw on the
EGL Revolving Credit Facility is subject to customary conditions.
On June 30, 2011, the Company borrowed $167.7 million
under the EGL Revolving Credit Facility, which was used to
prepay $167.7 million representing the total amounts owing
by the Company under the Knapton, Unionamerica and Enstar Group
facilities. The prepayment of these existing credit facilities
was a condition to the Companys initial borrowing under
the EGL Revolving Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2011, the
outstanding EGL Revolving Credit Facility loan balance was
$167.7 million.
The EGL Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a first priority
lien on the stock of certain of the Companys subsidiaries
and certain bank accounts held with Barclays Bank PLC in the
name of the Company and into which amounts received in respect
of any capital release from certain of the Companys
subsidiaries are required to be paid. Interest is payable at the
end of each interest period chosen by the Company or, at the
latest, each six months. The interest rate is LIBOR plus 2.75%,
plus an incremental amount tied to certain regulatory costs that
may be incurred by the lenders, if any. The unused portion of
the EGL Revolving Credit Facility will be subject to a
commitment fee of 1.10%. The EGL Revolving Credit Facility is
subject to various financial and business covenants applicable
to the Company, the guarantors and certain other material
subsidiaries, including limitations on mergers and
consolidations, acquisitions, indebtedness and guarantees,
restrictions as to dispositions of stock and dividends, and
limitations on liens on stock. As of June 30, 2011, all of
the covenants relating to the EGL Revolving Credit Facility were
met.
During the existence of any payment default, the interest rate
is increased by 1.0%. During the existence of any event of
default as specified in the EGL Credit Agreement, the agent may
cancel the commitments of the lenders, declare all or a portion
of outstanding amounts immediately due and payable, declare all
or a portion of outstanding
24
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
LOANS
PAYABLE (contd)
|
amounts payable upon demand or proceed against the security. The
EGL Credit Agreement terminates and all amounts borrowed must be
repaid on June 13, 2014, the third anniversary of the date
of the EGL Credit Agreement.
The fair value of the Companys floating rate loan
approximates its book value.
Clarendon
On March 4, 2011, the Company, through Clarendon Holdings,
Inc., entered into a $106.5 million term facility agreement
(the Clarendon Facility) with NAB. The Clarendon
Facility provides for a four-year term loan facility available
to be drawn to fund up to 50% of the purchase price of
Clarendon. As of June 30, 2011, Clarendon Holdings, Inc.
had not borrowed any of the amount available under the Clarendon
Facility. On July 12, 2011, the Company fully drew down the
Clarendon Facility in connection with the acquisition of
Clarendon.
The Clarendon Facility is secured by a security interest in all
of the assets of Clarendon Holdings, Inc., as well as a first
priority lien on the stock of both Clarendon Holdings, Inc. and
Clarendon. Interest is payable at the end of each interest
period chosen by Clarendon Holdings, Inc. or, at the latest,
each six months. The interest rate is LIBOR plus 2.75%. The
Clarendon Facility is subject to various financial and business
covenants, including limitations on mergers and consolidations,
restrictions as to disposition of stock and limitations on liens
on the stock.
During the existence of any payment default, the interest rate
is increased by 1.0%. During the existence of any event of
default (as specified in the term facility agreement), the
lenders may declare all or a portion of outstanding amounts
immediately due and payable, declare all or a portion of
borrowed amounts payable upon demand, or proceed against the
security. The Clarendon Facility terminates and all amounts
borrowed must be repaid on July 12, 2015.
The Companys share-based compensation plans provide for
the grant of various awards to its employees and to members of
the board of directors. These are described in Note 14 to
the consolidated financial statements contained in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010. The information below
includes both the employee and director components of the
Companys share-based compensation.
Employee stock awards for the six months ended June 30,
2011 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Fair
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
the Award
|
|
|
Nonvested January 1, 2011
|
|
|
153,930
|
|
|
$
|
13,019
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
69,003
|
|
|
|
5,736
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(19,003
|
)
|
|
|
(1,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested June 30, 2011
|
|
|
203,930
|
|
|
$
|
21,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
2006-2010
Annual Incentive Compensation Program,
2011-2015
Annual Incentive Compensation Program and 2006 Equity Incentive
Plan
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, 16,328 and
78,664 shares were awarded to directors, officers and
employees under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The total value
of the awards for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010 was $1.5 million and $5.4 million, respectively,
and was charged against the
2006-2010
Annual Incentive Compensation Program (the 2006
Program) accrual established for the years ended
25
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS (contd)
|
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The 2006 Program
ended effective December 31, 2010. On February 23,
2011, the Company adopted the Enstar Group Limited
2011-2015
Annual Incentive Compensation Program (the 2011
Program).
In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, 50,000 and 153,930 restricted shares were awarded to
certain employees under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The
total unrecognized compensation cost related to the
Companys non-vested share awards as at June 30, 2011
and 2010 was $11.8 million and $9.9 million,
respectively. This cost is expected to be recognized over the
next 4.2 years. Compensation costs of $0.7 million and
$1.2 million relating to these share awards were recognized
in the Companys statement of earnings for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared
to $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
The accrued expense relating to the 2011 Program for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $0.9 million
and $1.1 million, respectively as compared to
$2.2 million and $5.0 million, respectively, for three
and six months ended June 30, 2010 relating to the 2006
Program.
|
|
(ii)
|
Enstar
Group Limited Employee Share Purchase Plan
|
Compensation costs of less than $0.1 million and
$0.2 million, respectively, relating to the shares issued
have been recognized in the Companys statement of earnings
for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010. As at June 30, 2011, 16,829 shares have, in
total, been issued to employees under the Amended and Restated
Enstar Group Limited Employee Share Purchase Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Outstanding January 1, 2011
|
|
|
152,015
|
|
|
$
|
34.55
|
|
|
$
|
7,606
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(49,037
|
)
|
|
|
19.63
|
|
|
|
(3,709
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding June 30, 2011
|
|
|
102,978
|
|
|
$
|
41.65
|
|
|
$
|
6,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding and exercisable as of June 30,
2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ranges of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
Exercise
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Remaining
|
Prices
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
$40 - $60
|
|
|
102,978
|
|
|
$
|
41.65
|
|
|
|
2.2 years
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Deferred
Compensation and Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, 2,407 and
3,134 restricted share units, respectively, were credited to the
accounts of Non-Employee Directors under the Enstar Group
Limited Deferred Compensation and Ordinary Share Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (the Deferred Compensation
Plan).
Following J. Christopher Flowers resignation from the
Board of Directors, 3,610 restricted share units previously
credited to his account under the Deferred Compensation Plan
were converted into the same number of the Companys
ordinary shares on May 24, 2011, with fractional shares
paid in cash. Also on May 24, 2011, 4,515
26
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS (contd)
|
restricted stock units previously credited to
Mr. Flowers account under a deferred compensation
plan assumed in the Companys merger with Enstar USA, Inc.,
now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, were converted
into the same number of the Companys ordinary shares.
The Company provides pension benefits to eligible employees
through various plans sponsored by the Company. All pension
plans, except as disclosed below, are structured as defined
contribution plans. Pension expense for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 was $1.0 million and
$2.1 million, respectively, as compared to
$1.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for three
and six months ended June 30, 2010.
The Company acquired, as part of the acquisition of PW
Acquisition Company (PWAC) on July 20, 2010, a
noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the PWAC
Plan) that covers substantially all PWAC employees hired
before April 1, 2003 and provides pension and certain death
benefits. Effective April 1, 2004, PWAC froze the PWAC
Plan. As at the date of acquisition of PWAC by the Company, the
PWAC Plan had an unfunded liability of $6.7 million that
had been accrued by PWAC. Subsequent to acquisition, an
actuarial review was performed of the PWAC Plan which determined
that the PWAC Plans unfunded liability was
$8.1 million. As at June 30, 2011, PWAC had an accrued
liability of $7.9 million for the unfunded PWAC Plan
liability.
The Company recorded pension expense relating to the PWAC Plan,
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, of
$0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
27
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the comparison of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Enstar Group Limited
|
|
$
|
9,375
|
|
|
$
|
12,430
|
|
|
$
|
12,878
|
|
|
$
|
28,351
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
13,999,179
|
|
|
|
13,702,832
|
|
|
|
13,475,418
|
|
|
|
13,661,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to Enstar Group
Limited basic
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Enstar Group Limited
|
|
$
|
9,375
|
|
|
$
|
12,430
|
|
|
$
|
12,878
|
|
|
$
|
28,351
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
13,999,179
|
|
|
|
13,702,832
|
|
|
|
13,475,418
|
|
|
|
13,661,516
|
|
Share equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested shares
|
|
|
203,930
|
|
|
|
154,088
|
|
|
|
189,289
|
|
|
|
97,018
|
|
Restricted share units
|
|
|
17,106
|
|
|
|
16,059
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
15,233
|
|
Options
|
|
|
65,470
|
|
|
|
146,510
|
|
|
|
73,619
|
|
|
|
151,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
14,285,685
|
|
|
|
14,019,489
|
|
|
|
13,755,623
|
|
|
|
13,925,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to Enstar Group
Limited diluted
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The Company has entered into certain transactions with companies
and partnerships that are affiliated with J. Christopher
Flowers. Mr. Flowers is one of the largest shareholders of
the Company and formerly was a member of the Companys
board of directors.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company
funded $6.4 million of its remaining outstanding capital
commitment to entities affiliated with Mr. Flowers. The
Company had, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, excluding its investment in Varadero International Ltd. (a
hedge fund affiliated with the Company and Mr. Flowers with
respect to which the Company has funded 100% of its capital
commitment), investments in entities affiliated with
Mr. Flowers with a total value of $111.4 million and
$96.1 million, respectively, and outstanding commitments to
entities managed by Mr. Flowers, as of those same dates, of
$74.3 million and $84.6 million, respectively. The
Companys outstanding commitments may be drawn down over
approximately the next five years.
As at June 30, 2011, related party investments associated
with Mr. Flowers accounted for 99.8% of the total unfunded
capital commitments of the Company and 52.9% of the total amount
of investments classified as other investments by the Company.
28
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income tax expense for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 was $1.0 million and $1.6 million,
respectively, as compared to $16.1 million and
$22.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010.
Under current Bermuda law, the Company and its Bermuda
subsidiaries are not required to pay any taxes in Bermuda on
their income or capital gains. On March 25, 2011, the
Company received confirmation from the Minister of Finance in
Bermuda that, in the event of any taxes being imposed, the
period for which the Company and its Bermuda subsidiaries will
be exempt from taxation in Bermuda would be extended until March
2035.
The Company has operating subsidiaries and branch operations in
the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States and Europe and
is subject to federal, foreign, state and local taxes in those
jurisdictions. In addition, certain distributions from some
foreign sources may be subject to withholding taxes.
The expected income tax provision for the foreign operations
computed on pre-tax income at the weighted average tax rate has
been calculated as the sum of the pre-tax income in each
jurisdiction multiplied by that jurisdictions applicable
statutory tax rate.
The actual income tax rate for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 differed from the amount computed by
applying the effective rate of 0% under Bermuda law to earnings
before income taxes as shown in the following reconciliation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax
|
|
$
|
10,350
|
|
|
$
|
28,545
|
|
|
$
|
14,470
|
|
|
$
|
50,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected tax rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Foreign taxes at local expected rates
|
|
|
70.9
|
%
|
|
|
52.2
|
%
|
|
|
65.2
|
%
|
|
|
53.1
|
%
|
Benefit of loss carryovers
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
Change in uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(63.5
|
)%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
(49.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
Impact of Australian tax consolidation
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
43.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had net deferred tax assets of approximately
$14.9 million and $3.2 million as of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Deferred income
taxes arise from the recognition of temporary differences
between income determined for financial reporting purposes and
income tax purposes. The temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities
are net operating loss carryforwards, claims reserves due
principally to the discounting for tax, and investments.
The Company has estimated future taxable income of its foreign
subsidiaries and has provided a valuation allowance in respect
of those loss carryforwards where it does not expect to realize
a benefit. The Company has considered all available evidence
using a more likely than not standard in determining
the amount of the valuation allowance.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company
had unrecognized tax benefits of $5.7 million and
$5.6 million, respectively, relating to uncertain tax
positions.
29
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys operating subsidiaries in specific countries
may be subject to audit by various tax authorities and may have
different statutes of limitations expiration dates. With limited
exceptions, the Companys major subsidiaries that operate
in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia are no longer
subject to tax examinations for years before 2005, 2008 and
2005, respectively.
Because the Company operates in many jurisdictions, its net
earnings are subject to risk due to changing tax laws and tax
rates around the world. The current, rapidly changing economic
environment may increase the likelihood of substantial changes
to tax laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates. The
Company cannot predict what, if any, legislation will actually
be proposed or enacted, or what the effect of any such
legislation might be on the Companys financial condition
and results of operations.
On April 20, 2011, the Company entered into an Investment
Agreement (the Investment Agreement) with GSCP VI
AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Offshore Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Parallel
AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Employee Navi, Ltd., and GSCP VI GmbH
Navi, L.P. (collectively, the Purchasers), each of
which is an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co. Under
the Investment Agreement, the Company agreed to issue and sell,
and the Purchasers agreed to purchase, at several different
closings described immediately below, securities representing
19.9% of the Companys outstanding share capital pro forma
for all the issuances, with the right to acquire an additional
2.0% on a fully diluted basis pro forma for all the issuances
through the exercise of warrants as described below, although
the Purchasers voting interest in the Company purchased
pursuant to the Investment Agreement will be less than 4.9%. The
securities that the Purchasers have acquired or, subject to
certain conditions, will be acquiring at these closings can be
further summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
At the first closing, which occurred on April 20, 2011,
531,345 of the Companys voting ordinary shares, par value
$1.00 per share (Voting Common Shares), and 749,869
of the Companys newly created Series A convertible
non-voting preference shares, par value $1.00 per share (the
Non-Voting Preferred Shares), at a purchase price of
$86.00 per share, or approximately $110.2 million in the
aggregate. Upon the receipt of shareholder approval to create
three new classes of non-voting ordinary shares at the
Companys Annual General Meeting on June 28, 2011 (the
Shareholder Approval), the Non-Voting Preferred
Shares automatically converted on a
share-for-share
basis into non-voting ordinary shares of the Company, par value
$1.00 (the Non-Voting Common Shares). At the first
closing, the Company also issued to the Purchasers warrants to
acquire 340,820 Non-Voting Preferred Shares (which converted to
the right to acquire Non-Voting Common Shares upon receipt of
the Shareholder Approval) for an exercise price of $115.00 per
share, subject to certain adjustments. The Purchasers may, at
their election, satisfy the exercise price of the warrants on a
cashless basis by surrender of shares otherwise issuable upon
exercise of the warrants in accordance with a formula set forth
in the warrants. The warrants expire on the ten year anniversary
of the first closing.
|
|
|
|
At the second closing, which is expected to occur after receipt
of applicable regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other
closing conditions (but not before December 23, 2011),
134,184 Voting Common Shares and 827,504 Non-Voting Common
Shares, at a purchase price of $86.00 per share, or
approximately $82.7 million in the aggregate.
|
|
|
|
At the third closing, which was approved by the Companys
shareholders at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on
June 28, 2011 and which is expected to occur after receipt
of applicable regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other
closing conditions, 1,148,264 Non-Voting Common Shares, at a
purchase price of $86.00 per share, or approximately
$98.7 million in the aggregate. If the third closing
occurs, it is expected to occur simultaneously with the second
closing.
|
30
ENSTAR
GROUP LIMITED
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
SHARE
CAPITAL (contd)
|
The Purchasers may elect, at their option, to receive
Series B Non-Voting Common Shares in lieu of Voting Common
Shares that might otherwise be issuable to them at any of the
closings discussed above. Any such Series B Non-Voting
Common Shares would be convertible on a
share-for-share
basis, subject to certain adjustments, into Voting Common Shares
at the option of the Purchasers. All other Non-Voting Common
Shares received by the Purchasers under the Investment
Agreement, including those received upon conversion of the
Non-Voting Preferred Shares received at the first closing, are
Series C Non-Voting Common Shares. The Purchasers may also
elect to receive Series B Non-Voting Common Shares,
Series C Non-Voting Common Shares or Series D
Non-Voting Common Shares upon conversion of Voting Common Shares
held by them. In addition, the Purchasers may elect to receive
Series D Non-Voting Common Shares upon conversion of
Series B Non-Voting Common Shares or Series C
Non-Voting Common Shares held by them. There is no economic
difference in the
sub-series
of Non-Voting Common Shares, but there are slight differences in
the limited voting rights of each
sub-series
that are designed to address certain regulatory matters
affecting the Purchasers.
The total investment expected to be made by the Purchasers for
the purchase of the Voting Common Shares, the Non-Voting Common
Shares and the warrants is approximately $291.6 million.
The Company has accounted for the Purchasers investment
under the Investment Agreement as equity under the applicable
U.S. GAAP.
On June 28, 2011 at the Companys Annual General
Meeting, the Companys shareholders approved the
reallocation of the Companys authorized share capital as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
Pre-June 28,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(expressed in thousands)
|
|
|
Ordinary shares, par value $1.00 per share
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Non-voting convertible ordinary shares, par value $1.00 per share
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
Preference shares, par value $1.00 per share
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total authorized share capital
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the growing insignificance of the Companys
consulting activities in relation to its core reinsurance
operations, the Company has reevaluated its segment reporting
and concluded that it has one reportable segment. As a result of
the decreasing relative significance of consulting activities
and the associated revenues and earnings, the Company no longer
monitors the results of consulting activities separately for
evaluating business performance and for making resource
allocation decisions. Accordingly, effective January 1,
2011, the Company will no longer report separately the results
of its consulting activities. Prior to 2011, the Company
reported two segments: reinsurance and consulting.
31
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Enstar Group Limited
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet of Enstar Group Limited and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of June 30, 2011, and the related
condensed consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive
income for the three-month and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 and changes in shareholders
equity and cash flows for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010. These interim financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A
review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements
taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material
modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated
interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the consolidated balance sheet of Enstar Group Limited and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income,
changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended; and in our report dated March 4, 2011, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from
which it has been derived.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche Ltd.
Hamilton, Bermuda
August 5, 2011
32
|
|
Item 2.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following is a discussion and analysis of our results of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010. This discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with the attached unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto and the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Business
Overview
Enstar Group Limited, or Enstar, was formed in August 2001 under
the laws of Bermuda to acquire and manage insurance and
reinsurance companies in run-off and portfolios of insurance and
reinsurance business in run-off, and to provide management,
consulting and other services to the insurance and reinsurance
industry.
Since our formation, we have acquired 31 insurance and
reinsurance companies (excluding Clarendon National Insurance
Company, or Clarendon, which was acquired subsequent to the end
of our second quarter as discussed below) and 15 portfolios of
insurance and reinsurance business and are now administering
those businesses in run-off. Insurance and reinsurance companies
and portfolios of insurance and reinsurance business we acquire
that are in run-off no longer underwrite new policies. We derive
our net earnings from the ownership and management of these
companies and portfolios of business in run-off primarily by
settling insurance and reinsurance claims below the acquired
value of loss reserves and from returns on the portfolio of
investments retained to pay future claims. In addition, we
provide management and consultancy services, claims inspection
services and reinsurance collection services to our affiliates
and third-party clients for both fixed and success-based fees.
Recent
Transactions
Clarendon
On July 12, 2011, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary,
Clarendon Holdings, Inc., completed the acquisition of 100% of
the shares of Clarendon from Clarendon Insurance Group, Inc., an
affiliate of Hannover Re. Clarendon is a New Jersey-domiciled
insurer that is in run-off. Clarendon owns three other insurers,
two domiciled in New Jersey and one domiciled in Florida, that
are also in run-off. Clarendon and its subsidiaries reported
combined total assets of $2,102.6 million and combined
total liabilities of $1,845.8 million in their statutory
financial statements as of March 31, 2011. The purchase
price was $219.1 million and was financed in part by
borrowing $106.5 million under a four-year term loan
facility provided by National Australia Bank Limited, or NAB,
and the remainder from available cash on hand.
Laguna
On March 25, 2011, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary,
Kenmare Holdings Ltd., completed the acquisition of Laguna Life
Limited, formerly known as CitiLife Financial Limited, or
Laguna, from Citigroup Insurance Holding Corporation, or
Citigroup, an affiliate of Citigroup Inc. Laguna is an
Ireland-based life insurer that is in run-off. The purchase
price was 15.0 million (approximately
$21.2 million) and was funded from available cash on hand.
The previously disclosed purchase price of
30.0 million (approximately $42.4 million) was
reduced, prior to completion of the acquisition, after Citigroup
received approval from Lagunas regulator to distribute
15.0 million (approximately $21.2 million) to
its shareholders.
Significant
New Business
Shelbourne
RITC Transactions
In December 2007, we, in conjunction with JCF FPK I L.P., or JCF
FPK, and a newly-hired executive management team, formed
U.K.-based Shelbourne Group Limited, or Shelbourne, to invest in
Reinsurance to Close or RITC transactions (the
transferring of liabilities from one Lloyds syndicate to
another) with Lloyds of London insurance and reinsurance
syndicates in run-off. We own approximately 56.8% of Shelbourne,
which in turn owns 100% of Shelbourne Syndicate Services
Limited, the Managing Agency for Lloyds Syndicate 2008, a
syndicate approved by Lloyds of London on
December 16, 2007 to undertake RITC transactions with
Lloyds syndicates in run-off.
33
JCF FPK is a joint investment program between Fox-Pitt, Kelton,
Cochran, Caronia & Waller (USA) LLC, or FPK, and J.C.
Flowers II, L.P., or the Flowers Fund. The Flowers Fund is a
private investment fund advised by J.C. Flowers & Co.
LLC. J. Christopher Flowers, one of our largest shareholders and
formerly a member of our board of directors, is the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of J.C. Flowers & Co. LLC. In
addition, an affiliate of the Flowers Fund controlled
approximately 41% of FPK until its sale of FPK in December 2009.
In February 2011, Lloyds Syndicate 2008 entered into RITC
agreements with two Lloyds syndicates with total gross
insurance reserves of approximately $129.6 million. The
capital commitment to Lloyds Syndicate 2008 with respect
to these two RITC agreements amounted to £21.3 million
(approximately $34.1 million), which was fully funded from
available cash on hand.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated
statement of operations data for each of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting fees
|
|
$
|
2,045
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
6,081
|
|
|
$
|
17,628
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
22,928
|
|
|
|
22,998
|
|
|
|
41,470
|
|
|
|
49,119
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
(4,227
|
)
|
|
|
8,632
|
|
|
|
(2,025
|
)
|
Gain on bargain purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,237
|
|
|
|
22,271
|
|
|
|
69,288
|
|
|
|
64,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses
|
|
|
(27,829
|
)
|
|
|
(35,104
|
)
|
|
|
(30,441
|
)
|
|
|
(37,046
|
)
|
Reduction in provisions for bad debt
|
|
|
(1,672
|
)
|
|
|
(7,768
|
)
|
|
|
(1,672
|
)
|
|
|
(13,107
|
)
|
Reduction in provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
(11,783
|
)
|
|
|
(11,696
|
)
|
|
|
(23,320
|
)
|
|
|
(20,661
|
)
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
6,969
|
|
|
|
12,202
|
|
|
|
17,046
|
|
|
|
18,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,315
|
)
|
|
|
(42,366
|
)
|
|
|
(38,387
|
)
|
|
|
(51,962
|
)
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
16,723
|
|
|
|
14,254
|
|
|
|
27,105
|
|
|
|
29,444
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
28,211
|
|
|
|
15,801
|
|
|
|
45,961
|
|
|
|
26,288
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
5,199
|
|
Net foreign exchange losses (gains)
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
(5,615
|
)
|
|
|
9,266
|
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,248
|
|
|
|
(15,121
|
)
|
|
|
47,608
|
|
|
|
10,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes and share of net earnings of partly
owned company
|
|
|
15,989
|
|
|
|
37,392
|
|
|
|
21,680
|
|
|
|
53,780
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(975
|
)
|
|
|
(16,115
|
)
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
(22,037
|
)
|
Share of net earnings of partly owned company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS
|
|
|
15,014
|
|
|
|
23,480
|
|
|
|
20,088
|
|
|
|
41,096
|
|
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(5,639
|
)
|
|
|
(11,050
|
)
|
|
|
(7,210
|
)
|
|
|
(12,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED
|
|
$
|
9,375
|
|
|
$
|
12,430
|
|
|
$
|
12,878
|
|
|
$
|
28,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Comparison
of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and
2010
We reported consolidated net earnings, before net earnings
attributable to noncontrolling interest, of approximately
$15.0 million and $23.5 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in
earnings of approximately $8.5 million was attributable
primarily to the following:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
an increase in general and administrative expenses of
$12.4 million due primarily to increased professional fees,
certain
non-recurring
expenses associated with legal fees and settlement costs related
to certain litigation along with arrangement and agency fees
related to our revolving credit facility;
|
|
|
(ii)
|
lower net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities of $8.1 million;
|
|
|
(iii)
|
an increase in net foreign exchange losses of $7.5 million;
|
|
|
(iv)
|
a decrease of $2.2 million in income earned from our
investment in our partly owned company;
|
(v) an increase in salary and benefit costs of
$2.5 million due primarily to increased staff;
|
|
|
|
(vi)
|
a decrease in consulting fees of $1.5 million; partially
offset by
|
|
|
(vii)
|
a decrease in income tax expense of $15.1 million due in
large part to lower net earnings within our taxable
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
(viii)
|
an increase in net investment income and net realized and
unrealized gains of $9.4 million.
|
We recorded noncontrolling interest in earnings of
$5.6 million and $11.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net earnings
attributable to Enstar Group Limited decreased from
$12.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010
to $9.4 million for the three months ended June 30,
2011.
We no longer report our results of operations by segments. We
previously reported our results of operations under the
consulting and reinsurance business segments, but we believe the
consulting business no longer meets the criteria of an operating
segment, as more fully described in Note 15 to our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consulting
Fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,045
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
(1,455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We earned consulting fees of approximately $2.0 million and
$3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The decrease in consulting fees related
primarily to the decrease in management fees earned from
third-party agreements. Consulting fee income as a percentage of
net earnings has declined in recent periods, and we would expect
it to remain at or around current levels in future periods,
excluding the impact of any one time incentive based fees that
we might receive. While we intend to continue to provide
management and consultancy services, claims inspection services
and reinsurance collection services to third-party clients in
limited circumstances, our core focus continues to be acquiring
and managing insurance and reinsurance companies and portfolios
of business in run-off.
Net
Investment Income and Net Realized and Unrealized Gains
(Losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,928
|
|
|
$
|
22,998
|
|
|
$
|
(70
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,264
|
|
|
$
|
(4,227
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income for the three months ended June 30,
2011 decreased by $0.1 million to $22.9 million, as
compared to $23.0 million for the same period in 2010.
35
The average annualized return on our cash and fixed maturities
for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was 2.44%, as
compared to the average annualized return of 1.46% for the three
months ended June 30, 2010. The average credit rating of
our fixed maturity investments at June 30, 2011 was AA-.
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were $5.3 million and
$(4.2) million, respectively. The net realized and
unrealized gains (losses) relate predominantly to
mark-to-market
changes in the market value of our equity investments and fixed
maturity trading securities.
Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with the provisions of the Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures topic of the U.S. Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Codification, we have categorized our
investments that are recorded at fair value among levels as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identified Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
211,702
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
211,702
|
|
Non-U.S.
government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,147
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,486,875
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
1,487,418
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,013
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,048
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
55,057
|
|
Asset backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,044
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
61,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,431
|
|
|
|
65,890
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,779
|
|
|
|
148,840
|
|
|
|
255,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
61,459
|
|
|
$
|
2,377,207
|
|
|
$
|
153,823
|
|
|
$
|
2,592,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Reduction in Ultimate Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense
Liabilities:
The following table shows the components of the movement in the
net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Net losses paid
|
|
$
|
(65,208
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,863
|
)
|
Net reduction in case and loss adjustment expense reserves
|
|
|
65,074
|
|
|
|
53,718
|
|
Net reduction in incurred but not reported reserves
|
|
|
27,963
|
|
|
|
29,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses
|
|
|
27,829
|
|
|
|
35,104
|
|
Reduction in provisions for bad debt
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
7,768
|
|
Reduction in provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
11,783
|
|
|
|
11,696
|
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(6,969
|
)
|
|
|
(12,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
$
|
34,315
|
|
|
$
|
42,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in case and loss adjustment expense reserves, or
LAE reserves, comprises the movement during the quarter in
specific case reserve liabilities as a result of claims
settlements or changes advised to us by our policyholders and
attorneys, less changes in case reserves recoverable advised by
us to our reinsurers as a result of the settlement or movement
of assumed claims. Net reduction in incurred but not reported,
or IBNR, represents the change in our actuarial estimates of
losses incurred but not reported.
36
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2011 of
$34.3 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $27.8 million, a reduction in
provisions for bad debt of $1.7 million and a reduction in
provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense liabilities
of $11.8 million, relating to 2011 run-off activity,
partially offset by the amortization, over the estimated payout
period, of fair value adjustments relating to companies acquired
amounting to $7.0 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$27.8 million, comprised of net incurred loss development
of $0.1 million and reductions in IBNR reserves of
$28.0 million, primarily related to the completion of two
commutations of our largest ten exposures. The reductions in
provisions for bad debt of $1.7 million resulted from the
collection of receivables against which bad debt provisions had
been provided for in earlier periods.
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2010 of
$42.4 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $35.1 million, a reduction in
provisions for bad debt of $7.8 million and a reduction in
provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense liabilities
of $11.7 million, relating to 2010 run-off activity,
partially offset by the amortization, over the estimated payout
period, of fair value adjustments relating to companies acquired
amounting to $12.2 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$35.1 million comprised net favorable incurred loss
development of $5.9 million along with reductions in IBNR
reserves of $29.2 million. The reductions in provisions for
bad debt of $7.8 million resulted from the collection of
receivables against which bad debt provisions had been provided
for in earlier periods.
The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and
ending reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Losses incurred
and paid are reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Balance as at April 1
|
|
$
|
3,394,988
|
|
|
$
|
2,890,723
|
|
Less: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
583,478
|
|
|
|
435,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,811,510
|
|
|
|
2,455,043
|
|
Effect of exchange rate movement
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
|
|
(26,454
|
)
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
(34,315
|
)
|
|
|
(42,366
|
)
|
Net losses paid
|
|
|
(65,208
|
)
|
|
|
(47,863
|
)
|
Retroactive reinsurance contracts assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance as at June 30
|
|
|
2,710,967
|
|
|
|
2,472,489
|
|
Plus: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
556,374
|
|
|
|
421,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at June 30
|
|
$
|
3,267,341
|
|
|
$
|
2,894,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and Benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,723
|
|
|
$
|
14,254
|
|
|
$
|
(2,469
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits, which include expenses relating to our
discretionary bonus and employee share plans, were
$16.7 million and $14.3 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in
salaries and benefits was attributable to:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
increased staff costs due to an increase in average staff
numbers from 309 for the three months ended June 30, 2010
to 348 for the three months ended June 30, 2010; and
|
37
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
increased U.S. dollar costs of our U.K.-based staff
following an increase in the average British pound exchange rate
from approximately 1.5256 for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 to 1.6173 for the three months ended
June 30, 2011. Of our total headcount as at June 30,
2010 and 2011, approximately 68% and 64%, respectively, had
their salaries paid in British pounds; partially offset by
|
|
|
(iii)
|
a decrease in the discretionary bonus expense, for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, as a result of lower earnings.
Expenses relating to our discretionary bonus plan will be
variable and are dependent on our overall profitability.
|
General
and Administrative Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
28,211
|
|
|
$
|
15,801
|
|
|
$
|
(12,410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses increased by
$12.4 million during the three months ended June 30,
2011, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010.
The increase was due principally to:
(i) increased bank costs of $3.5 million primarily
associated with the arrangement and agency fees paid in relation
to the establishment of our revolving credit facility;
(ii) increased expenses of approximately $5.2 million
due primarily to legal fees and settlement costs associated with
certain litigation; and
(iii) increased actuarial consulting fees of approximately
$2.0 million due to costs associated with ongoing and
completed due diligence projects.
Interest
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,697
|
|
|
$
|
2,805
|
|
|
$
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense of $1.7 million and $2.8 million was
recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The decrease in interest expense was attributable
predominantly to the decrease in the total loans outstanding
during the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2010. As at June 30,
2010, we had approximately $270.9 million of outstanding
loans as compared to approximately $205.6 million as at
June 30, 2011.
Net
Foreign Exchange Losses (Gains):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,932
|
|
|
$
|
(5,615
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded net foreign exchange losses of $1.9 million and
gains of $5.6 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The net foreign
exchange losses for the three months ended June 30, 2011
arose primarily as a result of a decrease in the fair value of
our Australian dollar forward exchange contract, which expired
on June 30, 2011, resulting in $1.5 million being
recorded as part of net foreign exchange losses.
The net foreign exchange gains for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 arose primarily as a result of the holding of
surplus U.S. dollar assets in one of our subsidiaries whose
functional currency is Australian dollars at a time when the
U.S. dollar was appreciating against the Australian dollar,
partially offset by foreign exchange losses arising as a result
of our holding surplus British pounds at a time when the British
pound was depreciating against the U.S. dollar.
38
In addition to the net foreign exchange losses recorded in our
consolidated statement of earnings for the three months ended
June 30, 2011, we recorded in our condensed consolidated
statement of comprehensive income currency translation
adjustment gains, net of noncontrolling interest, of
$7.6 million as compared to losses, net of noncontrolling
interest, of $16.0 million for the same period in 2010. For
the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the currency
translation adjustments related primarily to our Australian
based subsidiaries. As the functional currency of these
subsidiaries is Australian dollars, we are required to record
any U.S. dollar gains or losses on the translation of their
net Australian dollar assets through accumulated other
comprehensive income.
Income
Tax Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
975
|
|
|
$
|
16,115
|
|
|
$
|
15,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded income tax expense of $1.0 million and
$16.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The decrease in taxes for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 was due predominantly to lower
overall net earnings in our tax paying subsidiaries as compared
to those earned in the same period in 2010.
Share of
Net Earnings of Partly Owned Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,203
|
|
|
$
|
(2,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded $nil
as our share of net earnings of partly owned company as compared
to $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30,
2010. The decrease was attributable to the fact that we no
longer have an investment in a partly owned company; during
2010, we disposed of our 44.4% indirect interest in Stonewall
Insurance Company and we acquired a 100% interest in Seaton
Insurance Company.
Noncontrolling
Interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,639
|
|
|
$
|
11,050
|
|
|
$
|
(5,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded a noncontrolling interest in earnings of
$5.6 million and $11.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease
for the three months ended June 30, 2011 in noncontrolling
interest was due primarily to a decrease in earnings for those
companies where there exists a noncontrolling interest.
Comparison
of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
We reported consolidated net earnings, before net earnings
attributable to noncontrolling interest, of approximately
$20.1 million and $41.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in
earnings of approximately $21.0 million was primarily
attributable to the following:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
a decrease in the net reduction in ultimate loss and loss
adjustment expense liabilities of $13.6 million;
|
|
|
(ii)
|
an increase in general and administrative expenses of
$19.7 million due primarily to an increase in professional
fees, legal fees and settlement costs related to certain
litigation and arrangement and agency fees associated with our
revolving credit facility;
|
|
|
(iii)
|
an increase in net foreign exchange losses of $7.3 million;
|
|
|
(iv)
|
a decrease of $9.4 million in income earned from our
investment in our partly owned company;
|
39
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
a decrease in consulting fees of $11.5 million mainly
related to lower fees earned from incentive based engagements;
partially offset by
|
|
|
(vi)
|
a decrease in income tax expense of $20.4 million due in
large part to lower net earnings within our taxable subsidiaries;
|
|
|
(vii)
|
the gain on bargain purchase of $13.1 million in 2011,
which arose in relation to our acquisition of Laguna;
|
|
|
(viii)
|
a decrease in salary and benefit costs of $2.3 million due
primarily to the release back to earnings of the unallocated
portion of the 2010 year end bonus accrual provision; and
|
|
|
(ix)
|
an increase of $3.0 million in net investment income and
net realized and unrealized gains (losses).
|
We recorded noncontrolling interest in earnings of
$7.2 million and $12.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net earnings
attributable to Enstar Group Limited decreased from
$28.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010
to $12.9 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011.
Consulting
Fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,081
|
|
|
$
|
17,628
|
|
|
$
|
(11,547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We earned consulting fees of approximately $6.1 million and
$17.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The decrease in consulting fees
primarily related to the decrease in incentive fees earned from
third-party agreements. Consulting fee income as a percentage of
net earnings has declined in recent periods, and we would expect
it to remain at or around current levels in future periods,
excluding the impact of any one time incentive based fees that
we might receive. While we intend to continue to provide
management and consultancy services, claims inspection services
and reinsurance collection services to third-party clients in
limited circumstances, our core focus continues to be acquiring
and managing insurance and reinsurance companies and portfolios
of business in run-off.
Net
Investment Income and Net Realized and Unrealized Gains
(Losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
41,470
|
|
|
$
|
49,119
|
|
|
$
|
(7,649
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,632
|
|
|
$
|
(2,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income for the six months ended June 30,
2011 decreased by $7.6 million to $41.5 million, as
compared to $49.1 million for the same period in 2010. The
decrease was attributable largely to lower unrealized gains in
our private equity portfolio, classified as other investments,
from $9.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010 to $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011.
The average annualized return on our cash and fixed maturities
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was 2.15%, as
compared to the average annualized return of 1.84% for the six
months ended June 30, 2010. The average credit rating of
our fixed maturity investments at June 30, 2011 was AA-.
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were $8.6 million and
$(2.0) million, respectively. The net realized and
unrealized gains (losses) relate predominantly to
mark-to-market
changes in the market value of our equity investments and fixed
maturity trading securities.
40
Gain on
Bargain Purchase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,105
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on bargain purchase of $13.1 million and $nil, was
recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The gain on bargain purchase was earned in
connection with our acquisition of Laguna and represents the
excess of the cumulative fair value of net assets acquired of
$34.3 million over the cost of $21.2 million. This
excess has, in accordance with the provisions of the Business
Combinations topic of the FASB Codification, been recognized as
income for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The gain on
bargain purchase arose mainly as a result of our reassessment,
upon acquisition, of the total required estimated costs to
manage the business to expiry. Our assessment of costs was lower
than the acquired costs recorded by the vendor in the financial
statements of Laguna.
Net
Reduction in Ultimate Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense
Liabilities:
The following table shows the components of the movement in the
net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Net losses paid
|
|
$
|
(153,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
(131,088
|
)
|
Net reduction in case and LAE reserves
|
|
|
148,504
|
|
|
|
132,572
|
|
Net reduction in IBNR
|
|
|
35,276
|
|
|
|
35,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses
|
|
|
30,441
|
|
|
|
37,046
|
|
Reduction in provisions for bad debt
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
13,107
|
|
Reduction in provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
23,320
|
|
|
|
20,661
|
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(17,046
|
)
|
|
|
(18,852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
$
|
38,387
|
|
|
$
|
51,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 of
$38.4 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $30.4 million, a reduction in
provisions for bad debt of $1.7 million and a reduction in
provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense liabilities
of $23.3 million, relating to 2011 run-off activity,
partially offset by the amortization, over the estimated payout
period, of fair value adjustments relating to companies acquired
amounting to $17.0 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$30.4 million, comprised of net incurred loss development
of $4.8 million and reductions in IBNR reserves of
$35.3 million, primarily related to the completion of two
commutations of our largest ten exposures. The reductions in
provisions for bad debt of $1.7 million resulted from the
collection of receivables against which bad debt provisions had
been provided for in earlier periods.
The net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 of
$52.0 million was attributable to a reduction in estimates
of net ultimate losses of $37.0 million, a reduction in
provisions for bad debt of $13.1 million and a reduction in
provisions for unallocated loss adjustment expense liabilities
of $20.7 million, relating to 2010 run-off activity,
partially offset by the amortization, over the estimated payout
period, of fair value adjustments relating to companies acquired
amounting to $18.9 million.
The reduction in estimates of net ultimate losses of
$37.0 million comprised net favorable incurred loss
development of $1.5 million along with reductions in IBNR
reserves of $35.6 million. The reductions in provisions for
bad debt of $13.1 million resulted from the collection of
receivables against which bad debt provisions had been provided
for in earlier periods.
41
The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and
ending reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Losses incurred
and paid are reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Balance as at January 1
|
|
$
|
3,291,275
|
|
|
$
|
2,479,136
|
|
Less: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
525,440
|
|
|
|
347,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,765,835
|
|
|
|
2,131,408
|
|
Effect of exchange rate movement
|
|
|
33,352
|
|
|
|
(62,429
|
)
|
Net reduction in ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
liabilities
|
|
|
(38,387
|
)
|
|
|
(51,962
|
)
|
Net losses paid
|
|
|
(153,339
|
)
|
|
|
(131,088
|
)
|
Acquired on purchase of subsidiaries
|
|
|
10,439
|
|
|
|
222,042
|
|
Retroactive reinsurance contracts assumed
|
|
|
93,067
|
|
|
|
364,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance as at June 30
|
|
|
2,710,967
|
|
|
|
2,472,489
|
|
Plus: total reinsurance reserves recoverable
|
|
|
556,374
|
|
|
|
421,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at June 30
|
|
$
|
3,267,341
|
|
|
$
|
2,894,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and Benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27,105
|
|
|
$
|
29,444
|
|
|
$
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits, which include expenses relating to our
discretionary bonus and employee share plans, were
$27.1 million and $29.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The decrease in salaries and benefits was attributable to:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
the reduction in the discretionary bonus accrual of
$7.2 million due to the release back to earnings in 2011 of
approximately $4.0 million relating to the unallocated
portion of the 2010 year end bonus accrual provision and
the reduction in net earnings for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 as compared to 2010. Expenses relating to our
discretionary bonus plan will be variable and are dependent on
our overall profitability; partially offset by
|
|
|
(ii)
|
increased staff costs due to an increase in the average staff
numbers from 302 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to
344 for the six months ended June 30, 2011; and
|
|
|
(iii)
|
increased U.S. dollar costs of our U.K.-based staff
following an increase in the average British pound exchange rate
from approximately 1.5269 for the six months ended June 30,
2010 to 1.6171 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Of
our total headcount as at June 30, 2010 and 2011,
approximately 68% and 64%, respectively, had their salaries paid
in British pounds.
|
General
and Administrative Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45,961
|
|
|
$
|
26,288
|
|
|
$
|
(19,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
General and administrative expenses increased by
$19.7 million during the six months ended June 30,
2011, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
The increase was due principally to:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
increased bank costs of $4.2 million primarily associated
with the costs of establishing and maintaining our letters of
credit, along with the arrangement and agency fees paid in
relation to the establishment of our revolving credit facility;
|
|
|
(i)
|
increased legal expenses of approximately $7.9 million due
primarily to legal fees and settlement costs associated with
certain litigation along with legal fees associated with ongoing
due diligence projects;
|
|
|
(iii)
|
increased rent and rent-related expense of $1.0 million due
largely to rent recoveries reflected in 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
(iv)
|
an increase in third-party management fees paid of
$2.3 million related to transition fees paid in respect of
recently completed acquisitions; and
|
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
an increase in actuarial consulting fees of approximately
$2.0 million due to costs associated with ongoing and
completed due diligence projects.
|
Interest
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,663
|
|
|
$
|
5,199
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense of $3.7 million and $5.2 million was
recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The decrease in interest expense was primarily
attributable to the reduction in loans outstanding along with an
overall lower interest rate on those loan amounts that were
outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. As at
June 30, 2010, we had approximately $270.9 million of
outstanding loans as compared to approximately
$205.6 million as at June 30, 2011.
Net
Foreign Exchange Losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,266
|
|
|
$
|
1,973
|
|
|
$
|
(7,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded net foreign exchange losses of $9.3 million and
$2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. For the six months ended June 30,
2011, the net foreign exchange losses arose primarily as a
result of: (i) holding surplus British pound liabilities at
a time when the British pound was appreciating against the
U.S. dollar; (ii) the currency mismatch that is
created by the holding of foreign currency
available-for-sale
security assets whereby any net foreign currency translation
gains or losses on those assets are reflected in the balance
sheet as part of accumulated other comprehensive income, but the
net foreign currency gains or losses on the corresponding
liabilities impact the statement of earnings; (iii) net
foreign exchange losses arising as a result of holding surplus
U.S. dollar assets in one of our subsidiaries whose
functional currency is Australian dollars at a time when the
U.S. dollar was depreciating against the Australian dollar;
and (iv) a decrease in the fair value of our Australian
dollar foreign currency forward exchange contract, which was
recognized as part of the net foreign exchange losses.
The net foreign exchange losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 arose primarily as a result of holding
surplus British pounds relating primarily to cash collateral
requirements to support British pound denominated letters of
credit required by U.K. regulators at a time when the British
pound was depreciating against the U.S. dollar, partially offset
by foreign exchange gains arising as a result of the holding of
surplus U.S. dollar assets in one of our subsidiaries whose
functional currency is Australian dollars at a time when the
U.S. dollar was appreciating against the Australian dollar.
In addition to the net foreign exchange losses recorded in our
consolidated statement of earnings for the six months ended
June 30, 2011, we recorded in our condensed consolidated
statement of comprehensive income
43
currency translation adjustment gains, net of noncontrolling
interest, of $9.2 million as compared to losses, net of
noncontrolling interest, of $12.1 million for the same
period in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, the currency translation adjustments related primarily to
our Australian based subsidiaries. As the functional currency of
these subsidiaries is Australian dollars, we are required to
record any U.S. dollar gains or losses on the translation
of their net Australian dollar assets through accumulated other
comprehensive income.
Income
Tax Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,592
|
|
|
$
|
22,037
|
|
|
$
|
20,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded income tax expense of $1.6 million and
$22.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The decrease in taxes for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 was due predominantly to lower overall
net earnings in our tax paying subsidiaries as compared to those
earned in the same period in 2010.
Share of
Net Earnings of Partly Owned Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,353
|
|
|
$
|
(9,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded $nil as
our share of net earnings of partly owned company as compared to
$9.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
The decrease was attributable to the fact that we no longer have
an investment in a partly owned company; during 2010, we
disposed of our 44.4% indirect interest in Stonewall Insurance
Company and we acquired a 100% interest in Seaton Insurance
Company.
Noncontrolling
Interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,210
|
|
|
$
|
12,745
|
|
|
$
|
(5,535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded a noncontrolling interest in earnings of
$7.2 million and $12.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 in noncontrolling
interest was due primarily to a decrease in earnings for those
companies where there exists a noncontrolling interest.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Long-term
Debt
On June 13, 2011, we, as borrower, and certain of our
subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a Revolving Credit
Facility Agreement with NAB and Barclays Corporate, the
corporate banking division of Barclays Bank PLC, as bookrunners
and mandated lead arrangers, certain financial institutions, as
lenders, and NAB as agent, or the EGL Credit Agreement. The EGL
Credit Agreement provides for a three-year revolving credit
facility pursuant to which we are permitted to borrow up to an
aggregate of $250.0 million, or the EGL Revolving Credit
Facility, which will be available to prepay certain existing
credit facilities of ours and certain of our subsidiaries, to
fund permitted acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
Our ability to draw on the EGL Revolving Credit Facility is
subject to customary conditions.
On June 30, 2011, we borrowed $167.7 million under the
EGL Revolving Credit Facility, which was used to prepay
$167.7 million representing the total amounts owing by us
under the Knapton, Unionamerica and Enstar Group facilities. The
prepayment of these existing credit facilities was a condition
to our initial borrowing under the
44
EGL Revolving Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2010, the
outstanding EGL Revolving Credit Facility loan balance was
$167.7 million.
The EGL Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a first priority
lien on the stock of certain of our subsidiaries and certain
bank accounts held with Barclays Bank PLC in our name and into
which amounts received in respect of any capital release from
certain of our subsidiaries are required to be paid. Interest is
payable at the end of each interest period chosen by us or, at
the latest, each six months. The interest rate is LIBOR plus
2.75%, plus an incremental amount tied to certain regulatory
costs that may be incurred by the lenders, if any. The unused
portion of the EGL Revolving Credit Facility will be subject to
a commitment fee of 1.10%. The EGL Revolving Credit Facility is
subject to various financial and business covenants applicable
to us, the guarantors and certain other material subsidiaries,
including limitations on mergers and consolidations,
acquisitions, indebtedness and guarantees, restrictions as to
dispositions of stock and dividends, and limitations on liens on
stock. As of June 30, 2011, all of the covenants relating
to the EGL Revolving Credit Facility were met.
During the existence of any payment default, the interest rate
is increased by 1.0%. During the existence of any event of
default as specified in the EGL Credit Agreement, the agent may
cancel the commitments of the lenders, declare all or a portion
of outstanding amounts immediately due and payable, declare all
or a portion of outstanding amounts payable upon demand or
proceed against the security. The EGL Credit Agreement
terminates and all amounts borrowed must be repaid on
June 13, 2014, the third anniversary of the date of the EGL
Credit Agreement.
Clarendon
On March 4, 2011, we, through Clarendon Holdings, Inc.,
entered into a $106.5 million term facility agreement, or
the Clarendon Facility, with NAB. The Clarendon Facility
provides for a four-year term loan facility, available to be
drawn to fund up to 50% of the purchase price of Clarendon. As
of June 30, 2011, Clarendon Holdings, Inc. had not borrowed
any of the amount available under the Clarendon Facility. On
July 12, 2011, we fully drew down the Clarendon Facility in
connection with the acquisition of Clarendon.
The Clarendon Facility is secured by a security interest in all
of the assets of Clarendon Holdings, Inc., as well as a first
priority lien on the stock of both Clarendon Holdings, Inc. and
Clarendon. Interest is payable at the end of each interest
period chosen by Clarendon Holdings, Inc. or, at the latest,
each six months. The interest rate is LIBOR plus 2.75%. The
Clarendon Facility is subject to various financial and business
covenants, including limitations on mergers and consolidations,
restrictions as to disposition of stock and limitations on liens
on the stock.
During the existence of any payment default, the interest rate
is increased by 1.0%. During the existence of any event of
default (as specified in the term facility agreement), the
lenders may declare all or a portion of outstanding amounts
immediately due and payable, declare all or a portion of
borrowed amounts payable upon demand, or proceed against the
security. The Clarendon Facility terminates and all amounts
borrowed must be repaid on July 12, 2015.
Private
Placement
On April 20, 2011, we entered into an Investment Agreement,
or the Investment Agreement, with GSCP VI AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP
VI Offshore Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Parallel AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI
Employee Navi, Ltd., and GSCP VI GmbH Navi, L.P., or,
collectively, the Purchasers, each of which is an affiliate of
Goldman, Sachs & Co. Under the Investment Agreement,
we agreed to issue and sell, and the Purchasers agreed to
purchase, at several different closings described below,
securities representing 19.9% of our outstanding share capital
pro forma for all the issuances, with the right to acquire an
additional 2.0% on a fully diluted basis pro forma for all the
issuances through the exercise of warrants as described below,
although the Purchasers voting interest in us purchased
pursuant to the Investment Agreement will be less than 4.9%. The
securities that the Purchasers have acquired or, subject to
certain conditions, will be acquiring at these closings can be
further summarized as follows:
At the first closing, which occurred on April 20, 2011, we
issued to the Purchasers 531,345 of our voting ordinary shares,
par value $1.00 per share, or the Voting Common Shares, and
749,869 of our Series A convertible non-voting preference
shares, par value $1.00 per share, or the Non-Voting Preferred
Shares, at a purchase price of $86.00 per share, and warrants to
acquire 340,820 Non-Voting Preferred Shares for an exercise
price of $115.00 per
45
share, for aggregate proceeds of approximately
$110.2 million. Upon the receipt of shareholder approval to
create three new classes of non-voting ordinary shares at our
Annual General Meeting on June 28, 2011, or the Shareholder
Approval, the Non-Voting Preferred Shares automatically
converted on a
share-for-share
basis into our non-voting ordinary shares, par value $1.00, or
the Non-Voting Common Shares, and the warrants became
exercisable for Non-Voting Common Shares rather than Non-Voting
Preferred Shares.
At the second closing, which is expected to occur after receipt
of applicable regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other
closing conditions (but not before December 23, 2011), we
will issue to the Purchasers 134,184 Voting Common Shares and
827,504 Non-Voting Common Shares, at a purchase price of $86.00
per share, for aggregate proceeds of approximately
$82.7 million.
At the third closing, which was approved by our shareholders at
the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on June 28, 2011
and which is expected to occur after receipt of applicable
regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other closing
conditions, we will issue to the Purchasers 1,148,264 Non-Voting
Common Shares, at a purchase price of $86.00 per share, for
aggregate proceeds of approximately $98.7 million. If the
third closing occurs, it is expected to occur simultaneously
with the second closing.
The Purchasers may elect, at their option, to receive
Series B Non-Voting Common Shares in lieu of Voting Common
Shares that might otherwise be issuable to them at any of the
closings discussed above. Any such Series B Non-Voting
Common Shares would be convertible on a
share-for-share
basis, subject to certain adjustments, into Voting Common Shares
at the option of the Purchasers. All other Non-Voting Common
Shares received by the Purchasers under the Investment
Agreement, including those received upon conversion of the
Non-Voting Preferred Shares received at the first closing, are
Series C Non-Voting Common Shares. The Purchasers may also
elect to receive Series B Non-Voting Common Shares,
Series C Non-Voting Common Shares or Series D
Non-Voting Common Shares upon conversion of Voting Common Shares
held by them. In addition, the Purchasers may elect to receive
Series D Non-Voting Common Shares upon conversion of
Series B Non-Voting Common Shares or Series C
Non-Voting Common Shares held by them. There is no economic
difference in the
sub-series
of Non-Voting Common Shares, but there are slight differences in
the limited voting rights of each
sub-series
that are designed to address certain regulatory matters
affecting the Purchasers.
The total investment expected to be made by the Purchasers for
the purchase of the Voting Common Shares, the Non-Voting Common
Shares and the warrants is approximately $291.6 million.
We believe that the proceeds received and to be received in
connection with the closings under the Investment Agreement will
provide us with capital and financial flexibility to pursue
desirable acquisitions of insurance and reinsurance companies in
run-off and portfolios of insurance and reinsurance business in
run-off.
Other than the above, there have been no material changes to our
liquidity position or capital resource requirements since
December 31, 2010. For more information refer to
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources included in Item 7 of our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Cash
Flows
With respect to the six month periods ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, net cash used in our operating activities was
$472.7 million and $695.6 million, respectively. The
decrease in cash used of $222.9 million was attributable
primarily to:
(i) an increase in the sales and maturities of trading
securities of $566.3 million partially offset by an
increase in purchases of trading securities of
$224.5 million. The increase in sales, maturities and
purchases of trading securities reflects the decision of our
investment committee to increase the allocation of our
investment portfolio to trading securities; partially offset by
(ii) an increase in the net changes in assets and
liabilities of $73.4 million.
46
Net cash provided by investing activities for the six month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was
$386.1 million and $115.7 million, respectively. The
increase in cash provided by investing activities of
$270.4 million was attributable primarily to:
(i) an increase of $207.1 million in the sales and
maturities of
available-for-sale
securities due to the decision of our investment committee to
increase the allocation of our investment portfolio to trading
securities;
(ii) a decrease in the net amount of purchases and
maturities of
held-to-maturity
securities of $146.9 million due to the decision of our
investment committee, discussed above, to increase the
allocation of our investment portfolio to trading securities;
(iii) a decrease of $42.7 million in funding of other
investments; and
(iv) an increase of $56.4 million in transfers out of
restricted cash and cash equivalents arising as a result of the
purchase of restricted investments classified as trading
securities; partially offset by
(v) a reduction in both the number and size of acquisitions
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2010 resulting in a net reduction
in cash flows related to acquisitions of $165.1 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the six month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $50.1 million
and $29.6 million, respectively. The increase of
$20.5 million in cash provided by financing activities was
attributable primarily to the following:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
net proceeds of $105.7 million received from the completion
of the private placement; partially offset by
|
|
|
(ii)
|
a net increase in the repayment of outstanding bank loans of
$60.8 million; and
|
|
|
(iii)
|
a decrease in net capital contributions (including dividends) of
$24.4 million received from noncontrolling interest.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
In February 2011, Lloyds Syndicate 2008 entered into RITC
agreements with two Lloyds syndicates with total gross
insurance reserves of approximately $129.6 million. Our
capital commitment to Lloyds Syndicate 2008 with respect
to these two RITC agreements amounted to £21.3 million
(approximately $34.1 million).
There have been no other material changes in our commitments or
contingencies since December 31, 2010. Refer to Item 7
included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Our critical accounting estimates are discussed in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition contained in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Off-Balance
Sheet and Special Purpose Entity Arrangements
At June 30, 2011, we did not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements, as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of
Regulation S-K.
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report contains statements that constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, with respect to our financial
condition, results of operations, business strategies, operating
efficiencies, competitive positions, growth opportunities, plans
and objectives of our management, as well as the markets for our
ordinary shares and the insurance and reinsurance sectors in
general. Statements that include words such as
estimate, project, plan,
intend, expect, anticipate,
believe, would, should,
could, seek, and similar statements of a
future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking
statements for purposes of the federal securities laws or
otherwise. All
47
forward-looking statements are necessarily estimates or
expectations, and not statements of historical fact, reflecting
the best judgment of our management and involve a number of
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements should, therefore,
be considered in light of various important factors, including
those set forth in this quarterly report.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those suggested by the forward-looking statements include:
|
|
|
|
|
risks associated with implementing our business strategies and
initiatives;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our loss reserves and the need to adjust such
reserves as claims develop over time;
|
|
|
|
risks relating to the availability and collectability of our
reinsurance;
|
|
|
|
risks that we may require additional capital in the future which
may not be available or may be available only on unfavorable
terms;
|
|
|
|
changes and uncertainty in economic conditions, including
interest rates, inflation, currency exchange rates, equity
markets and credit conditions, which could affect our investment
portfolio, our ability to finance future acquisitions and our
profitability;
|
|
|
|
operational risks as a result of our past and future
acquisitions, such as cash flow shortages, personnel recruitment
challenges, additional integration costs and excessive
management time and effort;
|
|
|
|
losses due to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
tax, regulatory or legal restrictions or limitations applicable
to us or the insurance and reinsurance business generally;
|
|
|
|
increased competitive pressures, including the consolidation and
increased globalization of reinsurance providers;
|
|
|
|
emerging claim and coverage issues;
|
|
|
|
lengthy and unpredictable litigation affecting assessment of
losses
and/or
coverage issues;
|
|
|
|
loss of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
changes in our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations or
intentions, which may happen at any time at managements
discretion;
|
|
|
|
operational risks, including system or human failures;
|
|
|
|
the risk that ongoing or future industry regulatory developments
will disrupt our business, or mandate changes in industry
practices in ways that increase our costs, decrease our revenues
or require us to alter aspects of the way we do business;
|
|
|
|
changes in Bermuda law or regulation or the political stability
of Bermuda;
|
|
|
|
changes in tax laws or regulations applicable to us or our
subsidiaries, or the risk that we or one of our
non-U.S. subsidiaries
become subject to significant, or significantly increased,
income taxes in the United States or elsewhere; and
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies or practices.
|
The factors listed above should be not construed as
exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other
cautionary statements and Risk Factors that are included in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, as well as in the
other materials filed and to be filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update or review any forward looking
statement, whether as a result of new information, future
developments or otherwise.
48
|
|
Item 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
In October 2010, we entered into a foreign currency forward
exchange contract as part of our overall foreign currency risk
management strategy. On the value date, June 30, 2011, we
sold Australian Dollars (AU$) 45.0 million for
$42.5 million. The contract exchange rate was AU$1 for
$0.9439. On June 15, 2011, we effectively closed out the
contract by entering into a forward exchange contract, with a
value date of June 30, 2011, where we bought
AU$45.0 million for $48.0 million. As at
June 30, 2011, we did not have any foreign currency forward
exchange contracts outstanding. Other than the foregoing, there
have been no material changes in our market risk exposures since
December 31, 2010. For more information refer to
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk included in Item 7A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
Item 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management performed an evaluation, with the participation
of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2011. Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to ensure that information that we are required to
disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and is accumulated
and communicated to management, including our principal
executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Controls
Our management has performed an evaluation, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, of changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended
June 30, 2011. Based upon that evaluation there were no
changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2011 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
49
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings
in the ordinary course of business, including litigation
regarding claims. We do not believe that the resolution of any
currently pending legal proceedings, either individually or
taken as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations or financial condition.
Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that lawsuits, arbitrations
or other litigation will not have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition or results of operations. We
anticipate that, similar to the rest of the insurance and
reinsurance industry, we will continue to be subject to
litigation and arbitration proceedings in the ordinary course of
business, including litigation generally related to the scope of
coverage with respect to asbestos and environmental claims.
There can be no assurance that any such future litigation will
not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
Our results of operations and financial condition are subject to
numerous risks and uncertainties described in Risk
Factors included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010. The risk factors
identified therein have not materially changed.
50
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
3.1(a)*
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Enstar Group Limited,
marked as amended.
|
3.1(b)*
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Enstar Group Limited.
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Designations for the Series A Convertible
Participating Non-Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 21, 2011).
|
10.1
|
|
Investment Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2011, by and
among Enstar Group Limited, GSCP VI AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI
Offshore Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Parallel AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI
Employee Navi, Ltd., and GSCP VI GmbH Navi, L.P. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 21, 2011).
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2
to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 21, 2011).
|
10.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2011,
by and among Enstar Group Limited, GSCP VI AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP
VI Offshore Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Parallel AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI
Employee Navi, Ltd., and GSCP VI GmbH Navi, L.P. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 21, 2011).
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Voting Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.4 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 21, 2011).
|
10.5+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Dominic F. Silvester, amending Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Enstar Group
Limited and Dominic F. Silvester (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 6, 2011).
|
10.6+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Paul J. OShea, amending
Employment Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and
Paul J. OShea (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 6, 2011).
|
10.7+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Nicholas A. Packer, amending Employment
Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and Nicholas A.
Packer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 6, 2011).
|
10.8+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Richard J. Harris, amending Employment
Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and Richard J.
Harris (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 6, 2011).
|
10.9*
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated June 13, 2011
among Enstar Group Limited and certain of its Subsidiaries,
National Australia Bank Limited and Barclays Corporate as
Arrangers, and National Australia Bank Limited as Agent and
Security Agent.
|
15.1*
|
|
Deloitte & Touche Ltd. Letter Regarding Unaudited
Interim Financial Information.
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
32.2**
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
101**
|
|
Interactive Data Files.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
+ |
|
Denotes management contract or compensatory arrangement |
51
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on
August 5, 2011.
ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Richard
J. Harris
|
Richard J. Harris,
Chief Financial Officer, Authorized Signatory and
Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
52
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
3.1(a)*
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Enstar Group Limited,
marked as amended.
|
3.1(b)*
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Enstar Group Limited.
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Designations for the Series A Convertible
Participating Non-Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 21, 2011).
|
10.1
|
|
Investment Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2011, by and
among Enstar Group Limited, GSCP VI AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI
Offshore Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Parallel AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI
Employee Navi, Ltd., and GSCP VI GmbH Navi, L.P. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 21, 2011).
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2
to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 21, 2011).
|
10.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2011,
by and among Enstar Group Limited, GSCP VI AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP
VI Offshore Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI Parallel AIV Navi, Ltd., GSCP VI
Employee Navi, Ltd., and GSCP VI GmbH Navi, L.P. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 21, 2011).
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Voting Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.4 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 21, 2011).
|
10.5+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Dominic F. Silvester, amending Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Enstar Group
Limited and Dominic F. Silvester (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 6, 2011).
|
10.6+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Paul J. OShea, amending
Employment Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and
Paul J. OShea (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 6, 2011).
|
10.7+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Nicholas A. Packer, amending Employment
Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and Nicholas A.
Packer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 6, 2011).
|
10.8+
|
|
Letter Agreement, effective January 1, 2011, by and between
Enstar Group Limited and Richard J. Harris, amending Employment
Agreement by and between Enstar Group Limited and Richard J.
Harris (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 6, 2011).
|
10.9*
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated June 13, 2011
among Enstar Group Limited and certain of its Subsidiaries,
National Australia Bank Limited and Barclays Corporate as
Arrangers, and National Australia Bank Limited as Agent and
Security Agent.
|
15.1*
|
|
Deloitte & Touche Ltd. Letter Regarding Unaudited
Interim Financial Information.
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
32.2**
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
101**
|
|
Interactive Data Files.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
+ |
|
Denotes management contract or compensatory arrangement |
53