12

Table of Contents

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three and Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2009

        The Company reported a net loss from continuing operations for the fourth quarter of 2009 of $3.7 million, or $(0.57) per share, which represented a 61% improvement over the loss of $9.4 million, or $(1.46) per share, for the fourth quarter of 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company's net loss from continuing operations was $13.2 million, compared to $16.8 million, a decrease of 21%. Including the loss from the sale of the Company's consumer finance subsidiary, Mariner Finance, in the third quarter of 2009, the net loss for the full year ended December 31, 2009 totaled $22.3 million compared to $15.1 million for the full year ended December 31, 2008.

        The net loss for the fourth quarter of 2009 included $4.5 million in credit-related charges to earnings, including a $3.3 million provision for loan losses and $1.2 million in expenses related to foreclosed properties. This represents a 38% decrease in credit related costs when compared to the fourth quarter of 2008, when the provision for loan losses was $4.2 million and the expenses on foreclosed properties was $3.1 million.

•

Total revenue for the fourth quarter 2009 was $13.8 million, an increase of $6.8 million over the fourth quarter of 2008's revenue of $7.0 million. Revenue totals for 2008 reflected $4.7 million in write-downs on securities for other than temporary impairments compared to $650 thousand in the fourth quarter of 2009. Also included in the improvement was lower interest expense on borrowings and deposits that helped increase the Company's net interest margin.



•

Net interest income increased $2.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 compared to the fourth quarter of 2008. The net interest margin for the fourth quarter of 2009 was 2.72%, an increase of 60 basis points from 2.12% in the fourth quarter of 2008. This was the result of a lower cost of funds and higher investment yields in 2009 when compared to 2008.



•

Average earning assets grew by $56.6 million, or 5.4%, compared with last year's fourth quarter, reflecting growth in portfolio loans and loans held for sale.



•

The provision for loan losses totaled $3.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2009, a decrease of 21% over the provision of $4.2 million in the corresponding quarter last year. Net charge-offs declined $1.3 million to $2.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2009 from $4.0 million of fourth quarter of 2008. The allowance for loans losses at the end of the fourth quarter of 2009 was $11.6 million, a decrease of 31% over the prior year's figure of $16.8 million. The decrease was primarily attributable to the removal of the allowance for loan losses that was related to Mariner Finance's loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.31% as of December 31, 2009, compared to 1.71% as of December 31, 2008. Non-performing assets remained relatively flat when compared to the fourth quarter of 2008, with $57.8 million in 2008 versus $57.4 million in 2009. While the non-performing assets and loans 90 or more days past due have stabilized year to year, there has been an improvement in the fourth quarter of 2009 when compared to the third quarter of 2009. Loans 90 days or more past due have decreased 54% from September 30, 2009 to December 31, 2009, moving from $20.2 million to $9.2 million.



•

Non-interest income for the fourth quarter of 2009 increased $4.8 million over the same quarter in 2008 mainly due to lower write-downs of investment securities.



•

Non-interest expenses decreased $1.9 million, or 10%, in the fourth quarter of 2009 when compared to the corresponding period last year. The costs related to foreclosed properties decreased $1.9 million, or 62%, in the fourth quarter of 2009 when compared to 2008. Although non-interest expenses decreased overall, there were significant increases in FDIC Insurance premiums and professional fees. FDIC Insurance premiums increased $0.75 million, or 229%, in the fourth quarter of 2009. Professional fees increased $0.78 million in the fourth quarter of 2009, and were the result of increased costs associated with regulatory compliance issues and expenses associated with the planned capital raise and other strategic initiatives.

13

Table of Contents

Comparison of Financial Condition for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008

        Comparing balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, total assets increased to $1.38 billion, 6% over the prior year's $1.31 billion.

•

Total loans outstanding decreased $87.7 million, or 9%, to $890.9 million as of December 31, 2009. The decrease is fully attributable to the sale of the assets of Mariner Finance in 2009, which represents $103.2 million of the decrease. Excluding the prior Mariner Finance loans, total loans increased by $14.4 million, primarily in residential mortgages.



•

Total deposits grew to $1.15 billion as of December 31, 2009, and increase of $196.3 million, or 21%, over December 31, 2008's deposits of $950.2 million. An increase in certificates of deposit was the primary reason for the overall increase in deposits. Total certificates of deposit were $811.4 million as of December 31, 2009, an increase of $200.1 million, or 33%, over December 31 2008's balance of $611.2 million. NOW accounts increased $1.6 million and savings accounts increased $1.8 million. Non-interest bearing checking accounts decreased $2.6 million and money market accounts decreased $4.7 million.



•

Stockholders' Equity was $26.9 million as of December 31, 2009, resulting in a book value per share of $4.18, a decrease of $2.95, compared to the book value of $7.13 at December 31, 2008. Capital ratios in the fourth quarter of 2009 for First Mariner Bank were as follows: Leverage Ratio = 6.2%; Tier 1 risk-based ratio = 7.9% Total Capital Ratio = 9.1%. This is an improvement over the capital ratios as of December 31, 2008 which were: Leverage Ratio = 5.8%; Tier 1 risk-based ratio = 6.8% Total Capital Ratio = 8.8%. The increase in the capital ratios for the Bank is attributable to the sale of Mariner Finance and the recent tax law change allowing companies to carryback their net operating losses further. Management will continue efforts to further increase these ratios in the first quarter of 2010.

        Sale of Finance Subsidiary.    On December 14, 2009, First Mariner consummated the sale of its equity interests in Mariner Finance to MF Raven Holdings, Inc., a newly formed Delaware corporation ("JV Corp"). The disposition was consummated pursuant to the Contribution and Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of October 7, 2009 (the "Contribution Agreement"), by and among the Company, Mariner Finance, JV Corp and MF Holdco, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company sponsored by Milestone Partners, a private equity firm. At the closing, the Company exchanged its equity interests in Mariner Finance for 50 shares of common stock of JV Corp and approximately $10.0 million in cash, (the "Cash Consideration"), of which cash $1.05 million will be held in escrow for up to 18 months to cover any indemnification obligations that the Company may have under the Contribution Agreement. The amount of the Cash Consideration is subject to possible adjustment based on the net assets of Mariner Finance at the time of the closing, which should be determined within 90 days of the closing.

        The initial net cash proceeds of approximately $8.5 million from the sale of Mariner Finance was down-streamed to the Bank. Additionally, First Mariner contributed to First Mariner Bank an outstanding note receivable from Mariner Finance. The note has a balance of $4.0 million and carries an interest rate of 7.0%. Within 90 days of the sale, First Mariner expects to receive an additional $575,000 and downstream those proceeds to the Bank. These contributions are expected in aggregate, to provide $13.1 million of additional capital and increase the regulatory capital ratios of the Bank.

        First Mariner's consolidated results of operations for the third quarter of 2009 reflect a loss of approximately $10.6 million relating to the sale of Mariner Finance. Although the sale took place in the fourth quarter of 2009, accounting standards required that First Mariner write down its recorded basis in Mariner Finance during the third quarter to the value of the consideration to be received upon the sale. The transaction did not, however, result in any current gain or loss for federal income tax

14

Table of Contents

purposes. Any deferred income tax benefit resulting from this transaction has been assigned a full valuation allowance.

        Potential Sale of Next Generational Services.    The Bank has entered into a profit sharing agreement with a private company related to NGFS, which may result in the acquisition of NGFS if certain requirements are satisfied within the next 18 months. The closing of the transaction is subject to numerous conditions, including, without limitation, that the parties obtain consents and approvals from certain lenders and governmental agencies that license and supervise the Bank. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the closing will occur when expected, if at all. We do not anticipate any benefit that results from the sale to be material.

Recent Operational Challenges

        Asset Quality.    Like many financial institutions across the United States, our operations have been impacted by the current economic crisis. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and continuing in 2009, the economic crisis that was initially confined to residential real estate and subprime lending has evolved into a global economic crisis that has negatively impacted not only liquidity and credit quality but also economic indicators such as the labor market, the capital markets and real estate values. As a result of this significant downturn, we have been adversely affected by declines in the residential and commercial real estate market in our market area. The declining home prices, slowing economic conditions and increasing levels of delinquencies and foreclosures have negatively affected the credit performance of our residential real estate, commercial real estate and real estate acquisition and development loans, resulting in an increase in our level of nonperforming assets and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing and charge-offs of problem loans. At the same time, competition among depository institutions in our markets for deposits and quality loans has increased significantly. These market conditions and the tightening of credit have led to increased deficiencies in our loan portfolio, a decreased interest margin, increased market volatility.

        During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest increased $7.08 million, or 10.49% to $74.52 million. Nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest as a percentage of total assets increased during this period from 5.16% as of December 31, 2008 to 5.28% as of September 30, 2009. Our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans decreased during this period from 1.71% as of December 31, 2008 to 1.23% as of September 30, 2009 and our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest decreased from 33.68% as of December 31, 2008 to 22.20% as of September 30, 2009. The primary reason for the decrease was the removal of the allowance for loan losses of Mariner Finance, which maintained an allowance for loan losses in excess of 4.5%.

        From December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008, nonperforming assets and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest increased $21.05 million, or 45.34%, to $67.44 million. Nonperforming assets and loans 90 days past due or more and still accruing interest as a percentage of total assets increased during this period from 3.72% at December 31, 2007 to 5.16% at December 31, 2008. Our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans increased during this period from 1.50% to 1.71% and our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest decreased from 44.66% to 33.68%.

        We recorded provisions for loan losses of $2.10 million and $8.36 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $14.78 million during the year ended December 31, 2008, which had a significant negative impact on our earnings.

        First Mariner Long-Term Debt.    At September 30, 2009, First Mariner had $73.72 million aggregate amount of outstanding subordinated debentures, consisting of seven issuances of subordinated debentures. The subordinated debentures were issued to seven trust subsidiaries, each of which, in turn,

15

Table of Contents

issued and sold trust preferred securities with aggregate liquidation amounts and interest rates at September 30, 2009 as set forth below.

        First Mariner accrued interest expense of $4.64 million on the trust preferred securities during the year ended December 31, 2008 and $2.44 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. On December 22, 2008, First Mariner announced its election to defer interest payments on the debentures relating to all of the trust preferred securities beginning with the January 7, 2009 payment, and January 8, 2009 with respect to those issued by Mariner Capital Trust V. The deferral of interest payments on the trust preferred securities for up to 20 consecutive quarters does not constitute an event of default under the trust preferred securities' governing documents.

        As further described above under "Recent Developments—Reduction of First Mariner Long-Term Debt," the Company has entered into the Exchange Agreement that, if approved by shareholders, will result in the elimination of subordinated debentures underlying $20.0 million aggregate liquidation amount of trust preferred securities issued by First Mariner Capital Trusts II, IV and VIII.

        Cease and Desist Orders.    On September 18, 2009, First Mariner Bank entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation for the State of Maryland (the "Commission") whereby the Bank consented to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist (the "September Order") promulgated by the FDIC and the Commissioner without admitting or denying the charges of unsafe or unsound banking practices.

        The September Order requires the Bank to adopt a plan to achieve and maintain a tier 1 leverage capital ratio of at least 7.5% of the Bank's total average assets and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 11% of its total risk-weighted assets by June 30, 2010. The September Order also requires the Bank to adopt a plan to achieve and maintain its tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital ratios at 6.5% and 10%, respectively, beginning on March 31, 2010. First Mariner Bank has presented a capital plan to the FDIC and the Commissioner detailing how it intends to achieve these capital thresholds by the required dates. At September 30, 2009, the Bank reported tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital ratios of 5.4% and 8.4%, respectively.

        By September 28, 2009, the Bank was required to charge-off or collect all loans on its books that, as of March 30, 2009, were classified as "Loss." The Bank has complied with the directive to charge off loans identified as "Loss." By November 17, 2009, the Bank was directed to adopt a plan to reduce its risk exposure on each asset classified as "Substandard" as of March 31, 2009. Specifically, these

16

Table of Contents

substandard assets must be reduced by 25% by June 18, 2010 and by 50% by the end of 2010. The Bank has adopted and submitted a plan in compliance with this directive and, as of the date of this document, the plan is being reviewed by the FDIC and the Commissioner. The September Order also generally prohibits the Bank from extending further credit to any existing borrower whose credit has been classified as "Loss", "Doubtful" or "Substandard" and is uncollected. In accordance with this directive, the Bank is no longer extending credit to these prohibited borrowers, unless conditions are met. Further, the Bank was required to, and has submitted, an annual budget and profit plan in advance which takes into account, among other things, the Bank's pricing structure, a recommendation for reducing the Bank's cost of funds, and the level of and provision expense for adversely classified loans. As of the date of this document, the plan is being reviewed by the FDIC and the Commissioner. While the September Order is in effect, the Bank may not pay dividends or management fees without the FDIC's prior consent and may not accept, renew or roll over any brokered deposits or pay effective yields on deposits that are greater than those generally paid in its markets.

        To maintain adequate liquidity, the Bank was directed to adopt a plan intended to reduce its reliance on non-core funding, wholesale funding sources, and high-cost rate-sensitive deposits. The steps required include identifying the source and use of borrowed and/or volatile funds, establishing back-lines of credit to the extent possible, establishing a minimum liquidity ratio, addressing concentrations of borrowed funds and the use of such funds, addressing pricing and collateral requirements with funding channels, and establishing a liquidity contingency plan. The Bank has submitted its liquidity plan to the FDIC and, as of the date of this document, the plan is being reviewed by the FDIC and the Commissioner.

        Finally, the September Order requires the Bank's board of directors to establish a compliance committee to oversee and insure the Bank's compliance with the September Order, 75% of the members of which must be non-employee directors. Prior to the entry of the September Order, the Bank had established a compliance committee in accordance with this directive, which committee will oversee and monitor compliance with the September Order.

        With the exception of achieving the higher capital ratios required by the September Order, we believe we have thus far complied with all requirements of the September Order and will continue to work to comply with all the September Order's future requirements. A copy of the September Order is included as an Exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein.

        On April 22, 2009, the Bank entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist, Order for Restitution and Order to Pay with the FDIC whereby First Mariner Bank consented to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist, Order for Restitution and Order to Pay (the "April Orders") promulgated by the FDIC without admitting or denying any violations of law and/or regulations. The April Orders relate to alleged violations of consumer protection regulations relative to First Mariner Bank's fair lending practices. The April Orders are based on findings by the FDIC that the Bank allegedly engaged in acts of discrimination in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (the "ECOA") and the Fair Housing Act (the "FHA") in 2005, 2006 and 2007 and in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTCA") in 2006 and 2007. The alleged violations of the ECOA and the FHA are based on the FDIC's belief that the Bank charged higher prices to certain Hispanic, African American and female borrowers ("Affected Borrowers") under residential mortgage loans, in the form of discretionary interest rate and point "overages," than it charged to similarly-situated non-minority borrowers. The alleged violations of the FTCA are based on the FDIC's belief that First Mariner Bank's disclosures for its payment-option adjustable-rate mortgage loans contained misleading information regarding the costs of the loans.

        Under the April Orders, the FDIC agreed to take no further action against the Bank in respect of the alleged violations. The April Orders required First Mariner Bank to pay up to $950,000 in

17

Table of Contents

restitution to the Affected Borrowers and imposed a civil money penalty of $50,000, all amounts for which were fully reserved in the final quarter of 2008. Other than requiring the Bank to cease and desist from violating the ECOA, the FHA and the FTCA, the Bank was required to and developed and implemented policies and procedures to (i) monitor and ensure compliance with fair lending laws and disclosure laws and regulations, (ii) ensure that the costs, terms, features and risks of the loans and services are adequately disclosed to applicants, and (iii) ensure the composition, qualifications, objectivity and independence of the internal auditor, audit staff and Audit Committee. The Bank must also conduct or sponsor quarterly financial literacy and education courses where it provides residential mortgage loans. The Bank is also prohibited from offering "payment-option" adjustable rate mortgage loans, although it voluntarily ceased offering these loans in 2007.

        The September and April Orders will remain in effect until terminated, modified, or suspended in writing by the FDIC and are periodically collectively referred to in this document as the "Cease and Desist Orders".

        The failure to comply with the Cease and Desist Orders or the New FRB Agreement could result in the initiation of further enforcement action by the FDIC, the Commissioner or the FRB, including the imposition of civil monetary penalties. The FDIC could direct us to seek a merger partner or take additional significant actions against the Bank and the Company. We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, significant additional regulatory compliance expense in connection with the Cease and Desist Orders and the FRB Agreements. For further information, see "Risk Factors—We are subject to restrictions and conditions of Cease and Desist Orders issued by the FDIC and the Commissioner and the New FRB Agreement. We have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant additional regulatory compliance expense in connection with these enforcement actions. Failure to comply with the Cease and Desist Orders or the FRB Agreements could result in additional enforcement action against us, including the imposition of monetary penalties.

        Federal Reserve Board Agreement.    On November 24, 2009, First Mariner entered into a written agreement with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "FRB") which replaced the Company's existing Memorandum of Understanding with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the "FRB Agreement"). The original FRB Agreement required First Mariner to: (i) develop and implement a strategic business plan that includes (a) actions that will be taken to improve our operating performance and reduce the level of parent company leverage, (b) a comprehensive budget and an expanded budget review process, (c) a description of the operating assumptions that form the basis for major projected income and expense components and provisions needed to maintain an adequate loan loss reserve and (d) a capital plan incorporating all capital needs, risks and regulatory guidelines; and (ii) submit plans to improve enterprise-wide risk management and effectiveness of internal audit programs. First Mariner Bancorp has also agreed to provide the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond with advance notice of any significant capital transactions. The new FRB Agreement (the "New FRB Agreement") prohibits First Mariner and the Bank from taking any of the following actions without the FRB's prior written approval: (i) declaring or paying any dividends; (ii) taking dividends from the Bank; (iii) making any distributions of interest, principal or other sums on First Mariners' subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities; (iv) incurring, increasing or guaranteeing any debt; or (v) repurchasing, redeeming any shares of its stock. Under the New FRB Agreement, First Mariner: must submit written plan to the FRB by January 28, 2010 to maintain sufficient capital, on a consolidated basis, such that First Mariner satisfies the FRB's minimum capital requirements. To satisfy the FRB's minimum capital requirements, First Mariner's consolidated tier 1 capital to total assets, tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and total capital to risk-weighted assets ratios at September 30, 2009 must be at least 4.0%, 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively. At September 30, 2009, those capital ratios were 2.4%, 2.7% and 5.4%.

        With the exception of achieving the higher capital ratios required by the FRB Agreement, we have complied with all requirements of the FRB Agreement and will continue to work to comply with all

18

Table of Contents

such requirements in the future. A copy of the New FRB Agreement is included as an Exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.

        Troubled Condition.    The Company and Bank are deemed to be in "troubled condition" within the meaning of federal statutes and regulations. As a result, the Company and Bank are subject to additional limitations and regulatory restrictions. For further information, see "Risk Factors—The Company and the Bank are deemed to be in "troubled condition."

Our Business Strategy

        In light of the operational challenges we recently have faced, our management team has taken, and will continue to aggressively pursue, a capital plan that is designed to solicit capital investment, reduce the Bank's expenses, improve the Bank's capital ratios and otherwise satisfy the requirements of the Cease and Desist Orders and the FRB Agreements described above. Our capital plan contemplates taking actions that may include the following, the combination of some or all of which we believe will improve our operations in the short-term and position us for long-term future opportunities:

        Manage Our Asset Quality.    We have taken several significant steps to manage our asset quality, including:

•

Risk Management Resources Have Been Increased.  Management has significantly increased resources dedicated to aggressively managing asset quality. These resources include: a dedicated workout group of nine full time employees, assisted by members of the Bank's executive management, accounting, credit administration, and facilities departments. Additionally, strategies have been introduced to slow our origination of new portfolio loans which, in turn, improves loan officer monitoring of existing loan relationship and facilitates the ability of commercial loan officers to manage asset quality through timely loan collection, appropriate loan modification or restructuring and marketing and sales of foreclosed properties.



•

ALT A Loans Exposure Has Been Significantly Reduced.  The vast majority of credit losses experienced by the Company since 2006 are directly attributable to the origination of ALT A loans in 2005 and 2006. ALT A loans gained popularity significantly during the early part of the decade and were generally characterized by higher loan to value and/or lower documentation requirements. As the residential real estate market weakened during the later half of 2006, the Company experienced a significant volume of loans that required repurchase under loan investor agreements due to early payment default. In total, the Company repurchased $41.0 million in ALT A loans in 2006 and 2007. Additionally, the Company was unable to sell approximately $16.0 million in originated ALT A loans that were subsequently transferred to the Company's loan portfolio. Credit related losses (charge-offs, write-downs maintenance and sales of foreclosed loans) related to ALT A loans have totaled $4.7 million, $15.6 million, and $11.0 million for 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively. Losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 totaled $5.1 million. Our remaining exposure to ALT A loans is now $14.1 million, with $8.0 million currently in non performing status.



•

Reduce Volume of Classified Assets.  We believe that the commitment of resources dedicated to aggressively managing asset quality and the reduction of our exposure to ALT A loans has stabilized our non performing loans and adversely classified assets. We continue to work through and resolve our remaining portfolio of ALT A residential loans, in that was a source of a considerable level of classified assets and losses. Except for our remaining ALT A loans, our classified loans are all loans made in our primary market area. By actively managing problem assets, we have reduced our classified assets by approximately 14% from $114.0 million at December 31, 2008 to $98.0 million at September 30, 2009. While our level of non-accrual loans and other real estate owned remained elevated, we do not believe that they have increased at the rate of our peer banks. The total of our non accrual loans and other real estate owned as a

19

Table of Contents

percentage of total loans and other real estate owned totaled 5.88%, 5.79% and 4.96% at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007 respectively. Peer banks (as measured in the latest Bank Holding Company Performance Report) reported totals of 4.24%, 2.71%, and 1.15% for the same periods. This places First Mariner in the 68^th percentile of the peer group as of September 30, 2009 compared to the 83^rd percentile at the end of 2008 and the 96^th percentile as of the end of 2007. The peer banks included in this report are all commercial Bank Holding Companies having assets between $1 billion and $3 billion. Our other loan portfolios with significant classified assets include residential construction and residential acquisition and development loans. We plan to reduce these portfolios in total and have active and aggressive workout plans in place for each loan. As of the date of this document, approximately 37% of our non performing assets consist of other real estate owned that is being actively marketed at levels at or below appraised values. We have experienced accelerated sales levels over recent months as housing inventories in northern Virginia and portions of Maryland have improved considerably. All non-performing assets have been written down to their latest appraised value which appraised values are updated no less than annually.

•

Strengthened Underwriting Standards.  Since 2007, we have significantly curtailed our residential construction and residential acquisition and development lending, and we discontinued Alt A lending in 2006. We have also applied more conservative underwriting practices, including, among other things, requiring more detailed credit information in certain circumstances, increasing the amount of required collateral or equity requirements or reducing loan-to-value ratios. As discussed below, we have sold our subsidiary, Mariner Finance, which, at September 30, 2009 held $108.5 million of primarily consumer loans (which loans were reclassified as loans held for sale as of September 30, 2009. Total consumer loans, including second mortgages and loans secured by deposits and other assets, decreased from $252.3 million at December 31, 2008 to $149.8 million at September 30, 2009. While we experienced an increase of $35.6 million in commercial mortgage loans and $19.1 million in residential mortgage loans at September 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008, commercial construction, consumer residential construction and commercial loans and lines of credit decreased by $9.2 million, or 8.4%, $19.1 million, or 27.5%, and $5.7 million, or 6.3%, respectively. While we continue to be aggressive in loan origination overall, in the near term, we do not intend to actively pursue loan origination in portfolios that traditionally carry a greater risk of loss than residential mortgage loans.

        Manage Our Balance Sheet.    In order to improve our capital position, we intend to strategically reduce the amount of our assets and liabilities over the course of the upcoming fiscal year. In addition to reducing the amount of loans, particularly commercial real estate and construction loans, we anticipate reducing our reliance on brokered certificates of deposit and expect to eliminate nearly all of our brokered certificates of deposit by the end of 2010. Among other strategies, we may also engage in loan and securities sales and sales of nonperforming assets, and sales of certain branch offices to effectively manage our balance sheet and improve our capital position.

        Reduce our Long-Term Debt.    As further described under "Recent Development—Reduction of First Mariner Long-Term Debt," on February 3, 2010 the Company entered into the Exchange Agreement with Edwin F. Hale, Sr., the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who has agreed to purchase trust preferred securities with an aggregate liquidation amount of $20.0 million issued by First Mariner Capital Trusts II, IV and VIII. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, Mr. Hale will tender $20.0 million aggregate liquidation amount of trust preferred securities to the Company in exchange for an aggregate of a number of shares of common stock valued at $2.0 million and warrants to acquire additional shares of common stock. Upon consummation of the Exchange, which is subject to stockholder approval, the Company intends to submit for cancellation the trust preferred securities, the common securities issued by Mariner Capital Trusts II, IV and VIII and the related subordinated

20

Table of Contents

debentures. If completed, the Exchange is expected to eliminate $20.0 million of subordinated debentures (recorded as debt on the Company's statement of condition). As a result of this elimination of $20.0 million in debt, the Company will no longer accrue interest expense with the respect to the $20.0 million of trust preferred securities to be exchanged. First Mariner accrued interest expense of $1.25 million on the $20.0 million of trust preferred securities during the year ended December 31, 2008 and $832,865 during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The Exchange also will increase the Company's total stockholders' equity by approximately $12.8 million, although the exact amount is subject to variation based on the valuation of the warrants at closing, from the cancellation of the trust preferred securities, the common securities and the subordinated debentures. The Exchange would be recorded during the quarter in which the trust preferred securities were cancelled, which is expected to be the first or second quarter of calendar year 2010. The Exchange is expected to significantly improve the Company's debt to equity ratios, debt service requirements, consolidated regulatory capital ratios, and book value per share. The Exchange will have no effect on the Bank's capital.

        Increase Our Capital.    We believe that our efforts to raise additional capital in the stock offering, in addition to the increase in capital from the sale of Mariner Finance, entering into the agreement with Mr. Hale for the Exchange, and the reduction of assets, will help us to achieve our goals of obtaining termination of the regulatory enforcement actions we are currently under, to mitigate the impact on First Mariner Bank of a worsening economy and manage our capital levels to maintain a capital cushion in excess of our regulatory capital requirement. On a pro forma basis, based on assets as of September 30, 2009, including the sale of Mariner Finance, and assuming the completion of the stock offering at the minimum of the offering range, the Bank's tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital ratios are expected to be 7.0% and 10.4%, respectively; at the maximum of the offering range, the Bank's tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital ratios are expected to be 7.8% and 11.4%, respectively. Therefore, on a pro forma basis as described above, while completing the stock offering at the minimum of the offering range would not satisfy the September Order's higher capital requirements required to be achieved by March 31, 2010 or June 30, 2010, completing the offering at the maximum point of the offering range would satisfy the September Order's higher capital requirements required to be achieved by March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010. Further, the capital plan we submitted to the FDIC and the Commissioner contemplates that we will raise at least $20.0 million of capital by March 31, 2010. This element of our capital plan would only be satisfied if the stock offering is completed at the maximum of the offering range. Therefore, if we do not raise at least $20.0 million in the stock offering by March 31, 2010, or, if we do not meet September Order's higher capital requirements required to achieved by June 30, 2010, we may need to undertake additional efforts to raise capital, or seek and obtain a waiver from these requirement from the FDIC and the Commissioner.

        As of September 30, 2009, the Company's consolidated capital ratios did not meet the FRB's minimum capital requirements. However, on a pro forma basis at September 30, 2009, the Exchange would increase the Company's consolidated ratios of tier 1 capital to total assets, tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and total capital to risk-weighted assets from 2.4%, 2.7% and 5.4%, respectively, to 4.2%, 4.8% and 8.8%, respectively. Including the sale of Mariner Finance and assuming (1) the completion of the Exchange and (2) the completion of the stock offering at the minimum and the maximum of the offering range, First Mariner's consolidated tier 1 capital to total assets, tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and total capital to risk-weighted assets ratios would be 5.2%, 5.9% and 9.6%, and 6.1%, 6.9% and 10.4%. Assuming only the completion of the stock offering (and including the sale of Mariner Finance, but not the completion of the Exchange), these capital ratios would be 3.3%, 3.8% and 7.6%, and 4.3%, 4.9% and 9.7%, respectively, at the minimum and maximum of the offering range. See "Capitalization." The completion of the Exchange will not have any impact on the Bank's capital ratios. See also "Risk Factors—As of September 30, 2009, the Bank's capital levels were not sufficient to achieve compliance with the higher capital requirements we must meet by June 30, 2010, nor were they, on a consolidated basis, sufficient to satisfy the FRB minimum requirements for the Company to be considered "adequately capitalized." When combined with the assets and liabilities that we are selling or of which we

21

Table of Contents

are otherwise disposing, the amount of capital we are raising may not be sufficient to achieve and maintain compliance with the capital requirements mandated by our regulators. The failure to meet these capital requirements could result in further action by our regulators."

        Sale of Mariner Finance.    On December 14, 2009, we completed the sale of our subsidiary, Mariner Finance to a third party. The sale of Mariner Finance provided approximately $12.5 million in additional regulatory capital to the Bank. Based on assets at September 30, 2009, on a pro forma basis, the sale of Mariner Finance increased the Bank's tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital ratios to 6.3% and 9.6%, respectively, and the Company's consolidated tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital ratios to 2.4% and 5.4%, respectively.

        Maximize Mortgage Banking Opportunities.    At September 30, 2009, approximately 43% of our loans held in portfolio were secured by residential real estate. These loans were comprised of residential mortgages, residential construction loans and residential acquisition and development loans. Approximately 18% of those loans were residential mortgages, which increased from $138.3 million at December 31, 2008 to $157.5 million at September 30, 2009. Accordingly, while we expect to reduce level of residential construction loans and residential acquisition and development loans, we intend to maximize our mortgage banking operation to originate residential mortgage loans while limiting the risk to the Bank. We believe that we have the capacity to expand this part of our loan portfolio which traditionally carries less underwriting risk than construction, acquisition and development, commercial and consumer lending. We intend to offer only limited recourse, conforming loans that are readily saleable in the secondary market and expect to generate fee income by selling some of these loans in the secondary market.

        We have experienced a significant improvement in the profitability of our mortgage banking operations as we have created greater cost efficiencies through the use of technology and the consolidation of branches and processing centers. Additionally, we have enjoyed wider spreads on the origination and sales of loans as price competition has eased and there has been a substantial decline in competition from brokers and non bank mortgage companies. This has resulted in higher level of originations and greater fee income from the origination and sale of residential mortgages.

        Diversification of our commercial products.    In order to diversify and minimize our concentration of credit risk, we are conservatively expanding into other lines of lending. We have recently established an asset based lending group that will provide lines or credit against receivables and inventories that are underwritten on prudent advance rates.

        Reduction of Branch Offices.    We have identified branches that we intend to offer for sale in 2010. The successful completion of this action is expected to reduce overhead costs by approximately $3.0 million and support our strategy of prudently reducing assets and liabilities. Total aggregate deposits in the branches identified for sale are approximately $50.0 million. The Bank has not entered into any agreement to sell any branch office and no guarantee can be made that any such agreement will be entered into and if such agreement is entered into, whether such sale will be consummated. If the Bank is unsuccessful in entering into a sale agreement, closures of selected locations would be pursued. The Bank would be required to provide 90 days' notice to the FDIC, the Commissioner and to customers prior to closing any branch office. The approval of the FDIC and the Commissioner would be required prior to the Bank's selling any branch office. While we anticipate that such approvals will be received, there can be no guarantee that such approvals will be received. We closed our Downtown Baltimore branch on February 15, 2010.

        Expense Control.    We expect to actively work to reduce unneeded or excess operating expenses. We have made it a priority to identify cost savings opportunities throughout all phases of our operations. In particular, once we are able to successfully manage our asset quality and terminate our regulatory enforcement actions, we expect to reduce significantly fees for consultants and other advisors and

22

Table of Contents

expenses related to the management of our nonperforming assets. Additionally, full compliance with the Orders and the New FRB Agreement is expected to reduce future expenses for corporate liability insurance and deposit insurance. Cost related to other real estate owned, legal and professional services, and deposit services currently total 20% of our operating expenses. During the last two years, management has reduced operating expenses of the Bank through the sale and/or closure of bank branches, consolidation of mortgage offices, reductions in staff, subletting of excess office space, and through the renegotiation of large servicing contracts. During this time, the Bank has reduced staffing by over 90 full time salaried positions, has closed its Randallstown, Crofton, and Towson offices, and sold its Ocean City branch. By year end 2010, the Bank will have reduced its branch total by 30% from its January 1, 2007 level of 27.

        Work to Obtain Termination of the Regulatory Enforcement Actions.    To date, we have complied with all of the requirements of the September Order and the New FRB Agreement. We have adopted a plan to reduce the Bank's risk exposure on each asset classified as "Substandard" which plan is being reviewed by the FDIC and the Commissioner. We have adopted a liquidity contingency plan which is being reviewed by the FDIC. We have submitted a capital plan and a business plan which plans have been approved by the FDIC and which contemplate this stock offering and a first calendar quarter 2010 closing date to the stock offering. We will seek to demonstrate as soon as possible to the FDIC, the FRB and the Commissioner that we have fully complied with the requirements of each of the regulatory enforcement actions and that they should be terminated. Although the FDIC, the FRB and the Commissioner may, in the future, grant us relief on some provisions in the regulatory enforcement actions, we do not expect the FDIC, the FRB and the Commissioner to terminate the regulatory enforcement actions prior to at least the first quarter of 2011. At such time, we will be able to return to a more typical level of regulatory oversight and redirect management resources from maintaining compliance with the regulatory enforcement actions to the operation of our institution.

23

Table of Contents

The Rights Offering

24

Table of Contents

25

Table of Contents

26

Table of Contents

27

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

        An investment in our shares of common stock involves a number of risks. You should consider carefully the risks described below in evaluating an investment in the shares of common stock. If any of the events in the following risks actually occurs, or if additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we believe are immaterial, materialize, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, the trading price of our shares of common stock could decline due to any of the events described in these risks.

Risks Related to Our Business

         We are subject to restrictions and conditions of the Cease and Desist Orders issued by the FDIC and the Commissioner, and the New FRB Agreement. We have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant additional regulatory compliance expense in connection with these enforcement actions. Failure to comply with the Cease and Desist Orders or the New FRB Agreement could result in additional enforcement action against us, including the imposition of further operating restrictions and monetary penalties.

        The FDIC and the Commissioner have issued the Cease and Desist Orders against First Mariner Bank and the Company has entered into the FRB Agreement and the New FRB Agreement. The September Order contains a number of significant directives, including higher capital requirements, requirements to reduce the level of our classified assets, operating restrictions and restrictions on dividend payments by the Bank. These restrictions may impede our ability to operate our own business. If we fail to comply with the terms and conditions of the Cease and Desist Orders or the New FRB Agreement, the appropriate regulatory authority could take additional enforcement action against us, including the imposition further operating restrictions and monetary penalties. We could also be directed to seek a merger partner. We have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant additional regulatory compliance expense in connection with the enforcement actions, and we will incur ongoing expenses attributable to compliance with the terms of the enforcement actions. Although we do not expect it, it is possible regulatory compliance expenses related to the enforcement actions could have a material adverse impact on us in the future. In addition, our ability to independently make certain changes to our business is restricted by the terms of the September Order and the New FRB Agreement, which could negatively impact the scope and flexibility of our business activities. While we believe that we will be able to take actions that will result in the Cease and Desist Orders and the New FRB Agreement being terminated in the future, we cannot guarantee that such actions will result in the termination of the Cease and Desist Orders and/or the New FRB Agreement. Further, the imposition of the Cease and Desist Orders and the New FRB Agreement may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified employees. For more information on the Cease and Desist Orders and the New FRB Agreement, see "Summary—Recent Operational Challenges—Cease and Desist Orders and—Federal Reserve Board Agreement."

         As of September 30, 2009, the Bank's capital levels were not sufficient to achieve compliance with the higher capital requirements we must meet by June 30, 2010, nor were they, on a consolidated basis, sufficient to satisfy the FRB's minimum capital requirements. When combined with the assets and liabilities that we are selling or of which we are otherwise disposing, the amount of capital we are raising may not be sufficient to achieve and maintain compliance with the capital requirements mandated by our regulators. The failure to meet these capital requirements could result in further action by our regulators.

        In the September Order, the FDIC and the Commissioner directed the Bank to raise its tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital ratios to 6.5% and 10%, respectively, by March 31, 2010 and to 7.5% and 11%, respectively, by June 30, 2010. At September 30, 2009, we did not meet these requirements and would have needed approximately $27.0 million in additional capital, based on assets at such date, to meet these requirements. This does not take into account the impact of the December 15, 2009 sale of Mariner Finance described in "Summary—Sale of Mariner Finance." First

28

Table of Contents

Mariner currently does not have any capital available to invest in the Bank and any further increases to our allowance for loan losses and operating losses would negatively impact our capital levels and make it more difficult to achieve the capital levels directed by the FDIC and the Commissioner.

        On a pro forma basis, based on assets as of September 30, 2009, including the sale of Mariner Finance and assuming the completion of the stock offering at the minimum of the offering range, the Bank's tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital ratios are expected to be 7.0% and 10.4%, respectively; at the maximum of the offering range, the Bank's tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital ratios are expected to be 7.8% and 11.4%, respectively. Therefore, on a pro forma basis as described above, while completing the stock offering at the minimum of the offering range would not satisfy the September Order's higher capital requirements required to be achieved by March 31, 2010 or June 30, 2010, completing the offering at the maximum point of the offering range would satisfy the September Order's higher capital requirements required to be achieved by March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010. Further, the capital plan we submitted to the FDIC and the Commissioner contemplates that we will raise at least $20.0 million of capital by March 31, 2010. This element of our capital plan would only be satisfied if the stock offering is completed at the maximum of the offering range. Therefore, if we do not raise at least $20.0 million in the stock offering by March 31, 2010, or, if we do not meet September Order's higher capital requirements required to achieved by June 30, 2010, we may need to undertake additional efforts to raise capital, or seek and obtain a waiver from these requirement from the FDIC and the Commissioner. If we cannot meet capital requirements within the proscribed timeframes and we were not granted a waiver of such requirements, the FDIC and the Commissioner could take additional enforcement action against us, including the imposition of monetary penalties, as well as further operating restrictions. The FDIC or the Commissioner could direct us to seek a merger partner or possibly place the Bank in receivership. If the Bank is placed into receivership, the Company would cease operations and liquidate or seek bankruptcy protection. If the Company were to liquidate or seek bankruptcy protection, we do not believe that there would be assets available to holders of the capital stock of the Company.

        Additionally, on November 24, 2009, First Mariner's primary regulator, the FRB, required the Company to enter into the New FRB Agreement. In accordance with the requirements of the New FRB Agreement, the Company has submitted a written plan to maintain sufficient capital at the holding company level, such that First Mariner satisfies the FRB's minimum capital requirements. As of the date of this document, the FRB is reviewing the Company's capital plan. To satisfy these requirements, First Mariner's consolidated tier 1 capital to total assets, tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and total capital to risk-weighted assets ratios at September 30, 2009 must be at least 4.0%, 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the Company's consolidated capital ratios did not meet the FRB's minimum capital requirements. However, on a pro forma basis at September 30, 2009, the Exchange would increase the Company's consolidated ratios of tier 1 capital to total assets, tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and total capital to risk-weighted assets from 2.4%, 2.7% and 5.4%, respectively, to 4.2%, 4.8% and 8.8%, respectively. Including the sale of Mariner Finance and assuming (1) the completion of the Exchange and (2) the completion of the stock offering at the minimum and the maximum of the offering range, First Mariner's consolidated tier 1 capital to total assets, tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and total capital to risk-weighted assets ratios would be 5.2%, 5.9% and 9.6%, and 6.1%, 6.9% and 10.4%. Assuming only the completion of the stock offering (and including the sale of Mariner Finance, but not the completion of the Exchange), these capital ratios would be 3.3%, 3.8% and 7.6%, and 4.3%, 4.9% and 9.7%, respectively, at the minimum and maximum of the offering range. See "Capitalization." If the Company does not satisfy the requirements of the written plan it has submitted to the FRB (once it is approved by the FRB), the FRB could take additional enforcement action against us, including the imposition of monetary penalties, as well as further operating restrictions.

29

Table of Contents

         If the amount of capital we raise in the stock offering and the other actions we are taking to reduce assets is insufficient to satisfy these capital requirements, we may need to take additional actions to reduce the amounts of our assets and liabilities, or we may need to raise additional capital through a share issuance in the future that would dilute your ownership if you did not, or were not permitted to, invest in the additional issuances.

        Should we in the future need to raise additional capital, we might seek to do so through one or more offerings of our common stock, securities convertible into common stock, or rights to acquire such securities of our common stock. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time and on our financial performance. Our stock price has declined in recent periods and was $1.41 at February 12, 2010. Moreover, the volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets have reached unprecedented levels, producing downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for numerous issuers. If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, and if our stock price remains at its current level, we may be unable to raise additional capital, or we may be able to raise capital only at prices that would be unfavorable and dilutive to our shareholders. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected, and our banking regulators may subject First Mariner Bank to further regulatory enforcement action.

        Under our Articles, we have additional authorized shares of common stock and preferred stock that we can issue from time to time at the discretion of our board of directors, without further action by the shareholders, except where shareholder approval is required by law or NASDAQ Global Market requirements.

        The issuance of any additional shares of common stock or convertible securities could be substantially dilutive to shareholders of our common stock, particularly those who are not able to or choose not to participate in such additional issuances. Holders of our shares of common stock have no preemptive rights that entitle them to purchase their pro-rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series and, therefore, our shareholders may not be permitted to invest in future issuances of our common stock and as a result will be diluted.

         In the event stockholders do not approve the Exchange or the Exchange otherwise is not completed, the Company would not achieve the increase in stockholders' equity expected to result from the Exchange.

        The Company has entered into an agreement to effect the Exchange, pursuant to which the Company will acquire trust preferred securities with an aggregate liquidation amount of $20.0 million from the Investor in exchange for consideration consisting of shares of Company common stock valued at $2.0 million and warrants to buy Company common stock. If completed, the Exchange is expected to increase stockholders' equity by approximately $12.8 million. Completion of the Exchange is subject to the approval of the Company's stockholders under the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, as well as other customary closing conditions. In the event stockholders do not approve the Exchange or the Exchange otherwise is not completed, the Company would not achieve the increase in stockholders' equity expected to result from the Exchange.

         We have taken actions, and may take additional actions, to help us meet immediate needs for capital, including reducing our assets and liabilities. The disposition of our assets and liabilities could hurt our long-term profitability.

        As further described under "Summary—Recent Developments—Reduction of First Mariner Long-Term Debt," on February 3, 2010, the Company entered into the Exchange Agreement with the Investor. If approved by shareholders, the Exchange will result in the elimination of subordinated debentures underlying $20.0 million aggregate liquidation amount of trust preferred securities issued by First Mariner Capital Trusts II, IV and VIII. On December 14, 2009, First Mariner consummated the

30

Table of Contents

sale of its equity interests in Mariner Finance to MF Raven Holdings, Inc. pursuant to the Contribution Agreement. At the closing, the Company exchanged its equity interests in Mariner Finance for 50 shares of common stock of JV Corp, valued at $675,000, and approximately $10.02 million in cash , of which $1.05 million will be held in escrow for up to 18 months to cover any indemnification obligations that the Company may have under the Contribution Agreement. The amount of the Cash Consideration is subject to possible adjustment based on the net assets of Mariner Finance at the time of the closing, which should be determined within 90 days of the closing. While this transaction provided First Mariner with $10.0 million in cash to invest in the Bank to increase the Bank's capital, as a result of the transaction, we will now realize only 5% of any income generated by Mariner Finance. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we realized a net loss of $8.97 million (including the loss on sale of $10.6 million) from the operations of Mariner Finance. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we earned $2.8 million and $2.7 million of net income from our investment in Mariner Finance.

        We have identified branches that we intend to offer for sale in 2010. The successful completion of these actions is expected to reduce overhead costs by approximately $3.0 million and support our strategy of prudently reducing assets and liabilities. Total aggregate deposits in the branches identified for sale and closure are approximately $50.0 million. The Bank has not entered into any agreement to sell any branch office and no guarantee can be made that any such agreement will be entered into and if such agreement is entered into, whether such sale will be consummated. The approval of the FDIC and the Commissioner will also need to be obtained by any acquirer before buying any of our branch offices. While we anticipate that such approvals would be received, there can be no guarantee that such approvals will be received. While these branch sales, if completed, will reduce our assets and liabilities and thereby increase our Bank capital ratios, we expect that our net income in the future will be reduced as a result of the loss of income generated by these branches.

         The Company and the Bank are deemed to be in "troubled condition" within the meaning of federal statutes and regulations.

        The Company and Bank are deemed to be in "troubled condition" within the meaning of federal statutes and regulations. As a result, certain limitations and regulatory requirements apply to the Company and the Bank with respect to future changes to senior executive management and directors and the payment of, or the agreement to pay, certain severance payments to officers, directors and employees. The Bank must also comply with specified recordkeeping requirements in connection with transactions involving certain securities contracts, commodities contracts, repurchase agreements and other "Qualified Financial Contracts."

         Liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and jeopardize our financial viability.

        Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry in general. The FHLB has reduced our line of credit from $202.21 million to $107.0 million, our current outstanding balance. The Federal Reserve Board has also notified the Bank that it will permit the Bank to draw on its line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank only in limited circumstances and for a short duration. Factors that could further detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity due to a market downturn or adverse regulatory action against us. As part of the September Order, we are not allowed to purchase brokered deposits without first obtaining a regulatory waiver. We are also required to comply with restrictions on deposit rates that we may offer. These factors could significantly affect our ability to fund normal operations. Our ability to acquire deposits or borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a severe disruption of the

31

Table of Contents

financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole as the recent turmoil faced by banking organizations in the domestic and worldwide credit markets deteriorates. At January 31, 2010 the Bank's liquidity level exceeded the amounts required under the Bank's liquidity policy.

         We have $73.72 million in face amount of outstanding trust preferred securities issued by trust subsidiaries of our holding company. We have elected to defer the payment of interest on the subordinated debentures associated with the trust preferred securities and expect to continue to defer the payment of interest following the offering. If by January 2014 we are unable to resume the payment of interest on the subordinated debentures, we would be in default under the terms of some of the trust preferred securities, and the holders of the remaining trust preferred securities would be entitled to declare an event of default. In such event, the holders of trust preferred securities would be entitled to exercise their available remedies, including acceleration of all amounts due under the subordinated debentures, and it is likely that the holders of our common stock would lose most or all of their investment.

        At September 30, 2009, we had $73.72 million in face amount of outstanding trust preferred securities issued at various dates by seven trust subsidiaries of First Mariner. First Mariner issued subordinated deferrable interest debentures to each trust in exchange for the proceeds of the offering of the trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities carried a weighted average interest rate of 4.54% during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The terms of the various indentures governing the subordinated debentures provide that we may defer the payment of interest on the subordinated debentures for up to twenty consecutive quarters, and we elected to defer such payments beginning in January 2009. Pursuant to the terms of the September Order, we have agreed with the FDIC and the Commissioner that we will not use the proceeds of this offering to redeem outstanding trust preferred securities or repay deferred interest on the related subordinated debentures, so our trust preferred securities will remain outstanding following the stock offering.

        Though we have deferred the payment of interest on the subordinated debentures related to the trust preferred securities, we continue to accrue interest expense related to the trust preferred securities. First Mariner accrued interest expense of $4.64 million on the trust preferred securities during the year ended December 31, 2008 and $2.44 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We will continue to accrue interest expense on trust preferred securities following the stock offering.

        Under the terms of the subordinated debentures, our deferral of interest payments for up to 20 consecutive quarters does not constitute an event of default. During the deferral period, the deferred interest payments continue to accrue. To the extent applicable law permits interest on interest, the deferred interest payments also accrue interest at the rates specified in the corresponding indentures, compounded quarterly. All of the deferred interest and the compound interest is due in full at the end of the applicable deferral period. If we fail to pay the deferred and compound interest at the end of the deferral period, each trustee of the various trusts, or in most cases the holders of 25% of the outstanding principal amount of any issue of trust preferred securities, would have the right, after any applicable grace period, to declare an event of default. The occurrence of an event of default on the subordinated debentures would entitle the trustees and holders of the trust preferred securities to exercise various remedies, including demanding immediate payment in full of the entire outstanding principal amount of the subordinated debentures.

        Currently we have no cash available at First Mariner to resume the payment of interest on the subordinated debentures, and the September Order prohibits our use of the proceeds from the stock offering for this purpose. Accordingly, our ability to resume the payment of interest on the subordinated debentures will depend on the Bank's ability to generate earnings and pay dividends to First Mariner. Currently, we are subject to the terms of the September Order, which prohibits the payment of dividends by the Bank without regulatory approval. As a result, if by January 2014 the

32

Table of Contents

September Order is not terminated, or if we do not achieve sufficient profitability for the Bank so that our regulators would grant approval for the Bank to pay dividends, we will be unable to resume the payment of interest on the subordinated debentures. Even if the Bank is able to resume paying dividends, we cannot be assured that the amount of dividends would be sufficient to pay the entire amount of interest due under the subordinated debentures at the end of the deferral period.

        For additional information regarding our outstanding trust preferred securities, see "Recent Developments—Reduction of First Mariner's Long-Term Debt."

         We have had losses in recent periods.

        We incurred net losses of $18.5 million loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, including a one-time charge of $10.6 million relating to the sale of Mariner Finance. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we incurred a loss of $15.1 million. Our earnings in these periods have been hurt by adverse economic conditions, including falling home prices, increasing foreclosures and increasing unemployment, in our markets, and our losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 included $8.36 million and $14.78 million, respectively, of provisions for loan losses. Our ability to return to profitability will depend on whether we are able to reduce credit losses in the future, which will depend, in part, on whether economic conditions in our markets improve. Our management believes that our current business plan will be successful and believes we will be able to limit our losses; however, our business plan is subject to current market conditions and its successful implementation is uncertain. There is no assurance that we will be successful in executing our business plan or that even if we successfully implement our business plan, we will be able to curtail our losses now or in the future. If we continue to incur significant operating losses, our stock price may further decline. Even if we raise enough capital in this offering to allow us upon completion of the offering to meet the Bank and consolidated capital levels mandated by our regulators, if we incur further operating losses we may in the future need to raise additional capital to maintain Bank and consolidated capital levels that meet or exceed the levels mandated by our regulators.

         Higher loan losses could require us to increase our allowance for loan losses through a charge to earnings.

        When we loan money we incur the risk that our borrowers do not repay their loans. We reserve for loan losses by establishing an allowance through a charge to earnings. The amount of this allowance is based on our assessment of loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The process for determining the amount of the allowance is critical to our financial results and condition. It requires subjective and complex judgments about the future, including forecasts of economic or market conditions that might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. We might underestimate the loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio and have loan losses in excess of the amount reserved. We might increase the allowance because of changing economic conditions. For example, in a rising interest rate environment, borrowers with adjustable-rate loans could see their payments increase. There may be a significant increase in the number of borrowers who are unable or unwilling to repay their loans, resulting in our charging off more loans and increasing our allowance. In addition, when real estate values decline, the potential severity of loss on a real estate-secured loan can increase significantly, especially in the case of loans with high combined loan-to-value ratios. The recent decline in the national economy and the local economies of the areas in which the loans are concentrated could result in an increase in loan delinquencies, foreclosures or repossessions resulting in increased charge-off amounts and the need for additional loan loss allowances in future periods. In addition, our determination as to the amount of our allowance for loan losses is subject to review by regulatory authorities, as part of their examination process, which may result in the establishment of an additional allowance after a review of the information available at the time of their examination. Our allowance

33

Table of Contents

for loan losses amounted to $11.1 million, or 1.23% of total loans outstanding and 22.3% of nonperforming loans ($29.7 million) and loans past-due 90 days or more and accruing ($20.2 million), as of September 30, 2009. Our allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2009 may not be sufficient to cover future loan losses. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would decrease our earnings. As of September 30, 2009, we had $869.97 million in outstanding loans that were performing according to their original terms. However, the deterioration of one or more of these performing loans could result in a significant increase in our nonperforming loans and our provision for loan losses, which would negatively impact our results of operations.

         We have a high percentage of commercial real estate and real estate construction loans in relation to our total loans.

        At September 30, 2009, we had $355.15 million in loans secured by commercial real estate and $150.94 million in real estate construction loans, which included $105.16 million in residential construction loans and $45.78 million for the construction of commercial properties. Commercial real estate loans and construction loans represented 39.48% and 16.78%, respectively, of our net loan portfolio. While commercial real estate and construction loans are generally more interest rate sensitive and carry higher yields than do residential mortgage loans, these types of loans generally expose a lender to greater risk of non-payment and loss than single-family residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation of the property, the income stream of the borrowers and, for construction loans, the accuracy of the estimate of the property's value at completion of construction and the estimated cost of construction. Such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to single-family residential mortgage loans.

        Current regulatory guidance suggests that institutions whose commercial real estate loans exceed certain percentages of capital should implement heightened risk management practices appropriate to their concentration risk and may be required to maintain higher capital ratios than institutions with lower concentrations in commercial real estate lending. Based on our commercial real estate concentration as of September 30, 2009, we may be subject to further supervisory analysis during future examinations. Although we continuously evaluate our concentration and risk management strategies, we cannot guarantee that any risk management practices we implement will be effective to prevent losses relating to our commercial real estate portfolio. Management cannot predict the extent to which this guidance will impact our operations or capital requirements.

         Mortgage banking activities generate a significant portion of our noninterest income.

        A significant portion of our business involves originating residential mortgage loans through our mortgage division, which accounted for approximately 57.5% and 47.0% of our noninterest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, respectively. Real estate loan origination activity, including refinancings, is generally greater during periods of low or declining interest rates and favorable economic conditions. Continued adverse changes in market conditions could have an adverse impact on our earnings through lower origination volumes.

         We face interest rate risk on our loans held for sale portfolio.

        We are exposed to interest rate risk in both our pipeline of mortgage originations (loans that have yet to close with the borrower) and in our warehouse loans (those loans that have closed with the borrower but have yet to be funded by investors). We have managed this interest rate risk through hedging strategies. We hedge a portion of our mortgage loan pipeline and warehouse utilizing forward sales of mortgage-backed securities for loans to be sold under mandatory delivery contracts. We expect that these derivative financial instruments (forward sales of mortgage-backed securities) will experience

34

Table of Contents

changes in fair value opposite to the change in fair value of the derivative loan commitments and our warehouse. However, the process of selling loans and use of forward sales of mortgage-backed securities to hedge interest rate risk associated with customer interest rate lock commitments involves greater risk than selling loans on an individual basis through best efforts forward delivery commitments. Hedging interest rate risk requires management to estimate the expected "fallout" (rate lock commitments with customers that do not complete the loan process). Additionally, the fair value of the hedge may not correlate precisely with the change in fair value of the rate lock commitments with the customer due to changes in market conditions, such as demand for loan products, or prices paid for differing types of loan products. Variances from management's estimates for customer fallout or market changes making the forward sale of mortgage-backed securities non-effective may result in higher volatility in our profits from selling mortgage loans originated for sale. We engage an experienced third party to assist us in managing our activities in hedging and marketing sales strategy.

         We face credit risk related to our residential mortgage production activities.

        We face credit risk related to our residential mortgage production activities. Credit risk is the potential for financial loss resulting from the failure of a borrower or an institution to honor its contractual obligations to us, including the risk that an investor will fail to honor its obligation under mandatory delivery contracts. We manage mortgage credit risk principally by selling substantially all of the mortgage loans that we produce, limiting credit recourse to the Bank in those transactions, and by retaining high credit quality mortgages in our loan portfolio. We also limit our risk of loss on mortgage loan sales by establishing limits on activity to any one investor and by entering into contractual relationships with only those financial institutions that are approved by our Secondary Marketing Committee. The period of time between closing on a loan commitment with the borrower and funding by the investor ranges from between 15 and 90 days.

         We face risk related to covenants in our loan sales agreements with investors.

        Our sales agreements with investors who buy our loans generally contain covenants which may require us to repurchase loans under certain provisions, including delinquencies, or return premiums paid by these investors should the loan be paid off early. Any loans we are required to repurchase may be considered impaired loans, with the potential for charge-offs and/or loss provision charges. The addition of these repurchased loans to our portfolio could adversely affect our earnings and asset quality ratios.

        There may be certain loans in our portfolio that were originated for sale, but for various reasons, are unable to be sold. These loans are transferred to our loan portfolio at fair market value. Any deterioration in value of the loan during the period held in the portfolio is charged to the allowance.

         Declines in asset values may result in impairment charges and adversely impact the value of our investments, financial performance and capital.

        We maintain an investment portfolio that includes, but is not limited to, mortgage-backed securities and pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations. The market value of investments may be affected by factors other than the underlying performance of the issuer, such as adverse changes in business climate and lack of liquidity for the resale of certain investment securities. As of September 30, 2009, we had $30.5 million, representing 73.0% of our securities portfolio, classified as available for sale pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") guidance. Unrealized gains and losses in the estimated value of the available-for-sale portfolio are "marked to market" and reflected as a separate item in stockholders' equity (net of tax) as accumulated other comprehensive income. The remaining investment securities are classified as trading and are stated at fair value with changes in value reflected in income.

35

Table of Contents

        There can be no assurance that future market performance of our securities portfolio will enable us to realize income from sales of securities. Stockholders' equity will continue to reflect the unrealized gains and losses (net of tax) of these securities. There can be no assurance that the market value of our securities portfolio will not decline, causing a corresponding decline in stockholders' equity.

        The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB"). A member of the FHLB system is required to purchase stock issued by the relevant FHLB bank based on how much it borrows from the FHLB and the quality of the collateral pledged to secure that borrowing. Included in our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2009 is approximately $7.9 million in capital stock of the FHLB. The FHLB is experiencing a potential capital shortfall, has suspended its quarterly cash dividend, and could possibly require its members, including First Mariner, to make additional capital investments in the FHLB. There can be no guaranty that the FHLB will declare future dividends. In order to avail itself of correspondent banking services offered by the FHLB, we must remain a member of the FHLB. If the FHLB were to cease operations, or if we were required to write-off its investment in the FHLB, our business, financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

        We periodically, but not less than quarterly, evaluate investments and other assets for impairment indicators. We may be required to record additional impairment charges if investments suffer a decline in value that is considered other-than-temporary. If we determine that a significant impairment has occurred, we would be required to charge against earnings the credit-related portion of the other than temporary impairment, which could have a material adverse effect on results of operations in the period in which the write-off occurs. Accounting guidance indicates that an investor in FHLB stock should recognize impairment if it concludes that it is not probable that it will ultimately recover the par value of its shares. The decision of whether impairment exists is a matter of judgment that should reflect the investor's an FHLB's long-term performance, which includes factors such as its operating performance, the severity and duration of declines in the market value of its net assets related to its capital stock amount, its commitment to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to its operating performance, the impact of legislation and regulatory changes on the FHLB, and accordingly, on the members of the FHLB and its liquidity and funding position. After evaluating all of these considerations, we believe the par value of our FHLB stock will be recovered, but future evaluations of the above mentioned factors could result in the Bank recognizing an impairment charge.

        Management believes that several factors will affect the market values of our securities portfolio. These include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates or expectations of changes, the degree of volatility in the securities markets, inflation rates or expectations of inflation and the slope of the interest rate yield curve (the yield curve refers to the differences between shorter-term and longer-term interest rates; a positively sloped yield curve means shorter-term rates are lower than longer-term rates). Also, the passage of time will affect the market values of our investment securities, in that the closer they are to maturing, the closer the market price should be to par value. These and other factors may impact specific categories of the portfolio differently, and management cannot predict the effect these factors may have on any specific category.

         Negative conditions in the general economy and financial services industry may limit our access to additional funding and adversely impact liquidity.

        An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance its activities could be impaired by factors that affect it specifically or the financial services industry in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of its business activity due to a market down turn or adverse regulatory action against it. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are nonspecific to us, such as severe disruption

36

Table of Contents

of the financial markets or negative news and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole as evidenced by recent turmoil in the domestic and worldwide credit markets.

         Increased and/or special FDIC assessments will negatively impact our earnings.

        Beginning in late 2008, the economic environment caused higher levels of bank failures, which dramatically increased FDIC resolution costs and led to a significant reduction in the Deposit Insurance Fund. As a result, the FDIC has significantly increased the initial base assessment rates paid by financial institutions for deposit insurance. The base assessment rate was increased by seven basis points (7 cents for every $100 of deposits) for the first quarter of 2009. Effective April 1, 2009, initial base assessment rates were changed to range from 12 basis points to 45 basis points across all risk categories with possible adjustments to these rates based on certain debt-related components. These increases in the base assessment rate have increased our deposit insurance costs and negatively impacted our earnings. In addition, in May 2009, the FDIC imposed a special assessment on all insured institutions due to recent bank and savings association failures. The emergency assessment amounted to 5 basis points on each institution's assets minus tier one (core) capital as of June 30, 2009, subject to a maximum equal to 10 basis points times the institution's assessment base. Our special assessment, which was reflected in earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, was approximately $600,000. The FDIC may impose additional emergency special assessments if necessary to maintain public confidence in federal deposit insurance or as a result of deterioration in the deposit insurance fund reserve ratio due to institution failures. Any additional emergency special assessment imposed by the FDIC will negatively impact our earnings.

        On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule requiring that all institutions prepay their assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. This pre-payment was due on December 30, 2009. However, the FDIC may exempt certain institutions from the prepayment requirement if the FDIC determines that the prepayment would adversely affect the safety and soundness of the institution. We have been granted an exemption to this prepayment requirement.

         Our ability to pay cash dividends is limited.

        Holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to dividends if declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. In general, future dividend policy is subject to the discretion of the board of directors and will depend including the future earnings, capital requirements, regulatory constraints, and our financial condition, as well as that of the Bank and Mariner Finance. As described above, we have entered into an agreement to sell our interest in Mariner Finance, which sale is expected to close in December 2009.

        Although the board of directors has declared cash dividends in the past, it has discontinued such payments to conserve cash and capital resources, and does not intend to declare cash dividends until current earnings are sufficient to generate adequate internal capital to support growth. Our current ability to pay dividends is largely dependent upon the receipt of dividends from the Bank. Both federal and state laws impose restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. Federal law prohibits the payment of a dividend by an insured depository institution if the depository institution is considered "undercapitalized" or if the payment of the dividend would make the institution "undercapitalized." For a Maryland commercial bank, dividends may be paid out of undivided profits or, with the prior approval of the Maryland Commissioner, from surplus in excess of 100% of required capital stock. If, however, the surplus of a Maryland bank is less than 100% of its required capital stock, then cash dividends may not be paid in excess of 90% of net earnings.

        Our ability to pay dividends is further subject to its ability to make payments of interest under junior subordinated debentures due through 2035 held by our statutory trusts Mariner Capital Trust II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII (collectively, the "Trusts"). These payments are necessary to fund the

37

Table of Contents

distributions that the Trusts each must pay to holders of its trust preferred securities (collectively, the "Trust Preferred Securities"). The terms of debentures permit us to defer interest payments for up to 20 quarterly periods. Such a deferral is not an event of default, but the interest continues to accrue and we are prohibited from paying any dividends on our common stock for so long as interest is deferred. We are also prohibited from paying any dividends on our common stock if we are in default under the debentures. On December 22, 2008, we announced our election to defer interest payments on the debentures relating to the Trust Preferred Securities beginning with the January 7, 2009 payment, and January 8, 2009 with respect to these issued by Mariner Capital Trust V. This deferment does not constitute an event of default on the securities; however, the cumulative interest on these securities must be paid prior to the declaration of any stock dividends.

        Finally, First Mariner and the Bank have entered into regulatory agreements with our regulators which, among other things, require us to seek prior regulatory approval before the Bank pays dividends to First Mariner and/or before First Mariner pays dividends on its common stock.

         Our funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits and support our future growth.

        We rely on customer deposits, advances from the FHLB, and lines of credit at other financial institutions to fund our operations. Although we have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, no assurance can be given that we would be able to replace such funds in the future if our financial condition or the financial condition of the FHLB or market conditions were to change. Our financial flexibility will be severely constrained and/or our cost of funds will increase if we are unable to maintain our access to funding or if financing necessary to accommodate future growth is not available at favorable interest rates. Finally, if we are required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, our revenues may not increase proportionately to cover our costs. In this case, our profitability would be adversely affected.

         We currently hold a significant amount of bank owned life insurance.

        We currently hold a significant amount of bank owned life insurance ("BOLI") on key employees and executives that have cash surrender values of $34.4 million as of September 30, 2009. The eventual repayment of the cash surrender value is subject to the ability of various insurance companies to pay benefits in the event of the death of an insured employee, or return the cash surrender value to us in the event of our need for liquidity. We continuously monitor the financial strength of the various insurance companies with whom we carry policies. However, there is no assurance that one or more of these companies will not experience a decline in financial strength, which could impair its ability to pay benefits or return our cash surrender value. Additionally, should we need to liquidate these policies for liquidity needs, we would be subject to taxation on the increase in cash surrender value as well as penalties for early termination of the insurance contracts. These events would have a negative impact on our earnings.

         Fluctuating interest rates can adversely affect our profitability.

        Our profitability is dependent to a large extent upon net interest income, which is the difference, or spread, between the interest earned on loans, securities and other interest-earning assets and the interest paid on deposits, borrowings, and other interest-bearing liabilities. Because of the differences in maturities and repricing characteristics of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, changes in interest rates do not produce equivalent changes in interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. We principally manage interest rate risk by managing our volume and mix of our earning assets and funding liabilities. In a rapidly changing interest rate environment, we may not be able to manage this risk effectively. Changes in interest rates also can affect: (1) our ability to originate and/or sell loans; (2) the value of our interest-earning assets, which would negatively impact shareholders' equity, and our ability to realize gains from the sale of

38

Table of Contents

such assets; (3) our ability to obtain and retain deposits in competition with other available investment alternatives; and (4) the ability of our borrowers to repay adjustable or variable rate loans. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including government monetary policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions and other factors beyond our control. If we are unable to manage interest rate risk effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed.

         We operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and state laws and regulations, including changes that may restrict our ability to foreclose on single-family home loans and offer overdraft protection.

        We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by federal and state banking authorities. Any change in applicable regulations or laws could have a substantial impact on us and our operations. Additional legislation and regulations that could significantly affect our powers, authority and operations may be enacted or adopted in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. New legislation proposed by Congress may give bankruptcy courts the power to reduce the increasing number of home foreclosures by giving bankruptcy judges the authority to restructure mortgages and reduce a borrower's payments. Property owners would be allowed to keep their property while working out their debts. Other similar bills placing additional temporary moratoriums on foreclosure sales or otherwise modifying foreclosure procedures to the benefit of borrowers and the detriment of lenders may be enacted by either Congress or the State of Maryland in the future. These laws may further restrict our collection efforts on one-to-four single-family mortgage loans. Additional legislation proposed or under consideration in Congress would give current debit and credit card holders the chance to opt out of an overdraft protection program and limit overdraft fees, which could result in additional operational costs and a reduction in our non-interest income.

        Further, our regulators have significant discretion and authority to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of laws by financial institutions and holding companies in the performance of their supervisory and enforcement duties. In this regard, banking regulators are considering additional regulations governing compensation, which may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain employees. On June 17, 2009, the Obama Administration published a comprehensive regulatory reform plan that is intended to modernize and protect the integrity of the United States financial system. The President's plan contains several elements that would have a direct effect on First Mariner and First Mariner Bank. The reform plan proposes the creation of a new federal agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, that would be dedicated to protecting consumers in the financial products and services market. The creation of this agency could result in new regulatory requirements and raise the cost of regulatory compliance. In addition, legislation stemming from the reform plan could require changes in regulatory capital requirements, and compensation practices. If implemented, the foregoing regulatory reforms may have a material impact on our operations. However, because the legislation needed to implement the President's reform plan has not been introduced, and because the final legislation may differ significantly from the legislation proposed by the Administration, we cannot determine the specific impact of regulatory reform at this time.

         We face significant operational risks.

        We operate in many different businesses in diverse markets and rely on the ability of our employees and systems to process a high number of transactions. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including, but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside of First Mariner and First Mariner Bank, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, and catastrophic failures resulting from terrorist acts or natural disasters, breaches of the internal control system, and compliance

39

Table of Contents

requirements and business continuation and disaster recovery. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity. We maintain a system of internal controls to mitigate against such occurrences and maintain insurance coverage for such risks that are insurable, but should such an event occur that results in a breakdown in the internal control system, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions, we could suffer financial loss, face regulatory action, and suffer damage to our reputation.

        Additionally, the financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations.

        Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on our ability to conduct business. Such events could affect the stability of our deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue and/or cause us to incur additional expenses. Operations in several of our markets could be disrupted by both the evacuation of large portions of the population as well as damage and/or lack of access to our banking and operation facilities. Although we have not experienced such an occurrence to date, severe weather or natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, or other adverse external events may occur in the future. Although management has established disaster recovery policies and procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

         Our management controls a significant percentage of our common stock.

        At September 30, 2009, our directors and executive officers beneficially owned approximately 1,985,758 shares of our common stock (amount includes shares that could be acquired pursuant to immediately exercisable stock options), or 30.8% of our outstanding shares of common stock plus exercisable options. Edwin F. Hale, Sr., who is our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and largest stockholder, beneficially owns 1,461,366 shares of common stock (with options), or 22.6% of our outstanding shares of common stock plus exercisable options as of September 30, 2009. These amounts do not include shares that may be issued in the Exchange if the Exchange is approved by shareholders at the special meeting shareholders to be held on March 19, 2010. For more information on the Exchange, see "Summary—Recent Developments—Reduction of First Mariner Long-Term Debt" and "Capitalization—Pro Forma Adjustments for Exchange of Common Stock and Warrants for Trust Preferred Securities," below, as well as the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2010 and its Definitive Proxy Statement, filed with the SEC on February 16, 2010, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Because of the large percentage of stock held by our directors and executive officers, these persons could influence the outcome of any matter submitted to a vote of our shareholders.

40

Table of Contents

         Contracts with our officers may discourage a takeover or adversely affect our takeover value.

        We have entered into change in control agreements with nine of our officers. These agreements provide for a payment to each officer of a multiple (ranging from 1 to 2.99) of his or her salary and bonus upon the occurrence of either a change in control that results in the loss of employment or a significant change in his or her employment. Thus, we may be required to make significant payments in the event that the rights under these agreements are triggered by a change in control. As a result, these contracts may discourage a takeover, or adversely affect the consideration payable to stockholders in the event of a takeover. Notwithstanding the foregoing, because the Company and the bank are considered to be in "troubled condition" for regulatory purposes, payments made under any change of control agreement are subject to certain regulatory restrictions and limitations. The Company and the Bank must apply for and receive the approval of the FRB and the FDIC, respectively, in order to make payments under these agreements. See "—The Company and the Bank are deemed to be in "troubled condition."

         Our Articles and Bylaws and Maryland law may discourage a corporate takeover.

        Our Articles and Amended and Restated Bylaws ("Bylaws") contain certain provisions designed to enhance the ability of the board of directors to deal with attempts to acquire control of First Mariner. These provisions provide for the classification of our board of directors into three classes; directors of each class serve for staggered three year periods. The Articles also provide for supermajority voting provisions for the approval of certain business combinations.

        Maryland law also contains anti-takeover provisions that apply to us. The Maryland Business Combination Act generally prohibits, subject to certain limited exceptions, corporations from being involved in any "business combination" (defined as a variety of transactions, including a merger, consolidation, share exchange, asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities) with any "interested shareholder" for a period of five years following the most recent date on which the interested shareholder became an interested shareholder. An interested shareholder is defined generally as a person who is the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation after the date on which the corporation had 100 or more beneficial owners of its stock or who is an affiliate or associate of the corporation and was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% percent or more of the voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question and after the date on which the corporation had 100 or more beneficial owners of its stock. The Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act applies to acquisitions of "control shares," which, subject to certain exceptions, are shares the acquisition of which entitle the holder, directly or indirectly, to exercise or direct the exercise of the voting power of shares of stock of the corporation in the election of directors within any of the following ranges of voting power: one-tenth or more, but less than one-third of all voting power; one-third or more, but less than a majority of all voting power or a majority or more of all voting power. Control shares have limited voting rights.

        Although these provisions do not preclude a takeover, they may have the effect of discouraging a future takeover attempt which would not be approved by our board of directors, but pursuant to which stockholders might receive a substantial premium for their shares over then-current market prices. As a result, stockholders who might desire to participate in such a transaction might not have the opportunity to do so. Such provisions will also render the removal of our board of directors and of management more difficult and, therefore, may serve to perpetuate current management. Further, such provisions could potentially adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

41

Table of Contents

         A continuation of recent turmoil in the financial markets could have an adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

        Beginning in 2008, United States and global financial markets have experienced severe disruption and volatility, and general economic conditions have declined significantly. Adverse developments in credit quality, asset values and revenue opportunities throughout the financial services industry, as well as general uncertainty regarding the economic, industry and regulatory environment, have had a marked negative impact on the industry. Dramatic declines in the U.S. housing market over the past two years, with falling home prices, increasing foreclosures and increasing unemployment, have negatively affected the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by many financial institutions. The United States and the governments of other countries have taken steps to try to stabilize the financial system, including investing in financial institutions, and have also been working to design and implement programs to improve general economic conditions. Notwithstanding the actions of the United States and other governments, these efforts may not succeed in restoring industry, economic or market conditions and may result in adverse unintended consequences. Factors that could continue to pressure financial services companies, including First Mariner, are numerous and include (i) worsening credit quality, leading among other things to increases in loan losses and reserves, (ii) continued or worsening disruption and volatility in financial markets, leading among other things to continuing reductions in asset values, (iii) capital and liquidity concerns regarding financial institutions generally, (iv) limitations resulting from or imposed in connection with governmental actions intended to stabilize or provide additional regulation of the financial system, or (v) recessionary conditions that are deeper or last longer than currently anticipated.

         Our financial condition and results of operations are dependant on the economy in the Bank's market area.

        First Mariner Bank's primary market area for its core banking operations consists of central Maryland and portions of Maryland's eastern shore. Because of the Bank's concentration of business activities in its market area, our financial condition and results of operations depend upon economic conditions in the Bank's market area. Adverse economic conditions in our market area could reduce our growth rate, affect the ability of our customers to repay their loans and generally affect our financial condition and results of operations. Conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, high interest rates, short money supply, scarce natural resources, international disorders, terrorism and other factors beyond our control may adversely affect our profitability. We are less able than a larger institution to spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies. Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or losses caused by adverse market or economic conditions in the State of Maryland could adversely affect the value of our assets, revenues, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, we cannot give any assurance we will benefit from any market growth or favorable economic conditions in our primary market areas if they do occur.

         We currently have a significant amount of deferred tax assets.

        We had $28.5 million of deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2009. The analysis of the realization of deferred tax assets requires making various forecasts and assumptions, including future flows of taxable income. Actual results may differ from forecasts and assumptions, which could cause a write down of our deferred tax assets and have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

42

Table of Contents

         If we are unable to satisfy the continued listing standards of NASDAQ, our stock may be delisted from the NASDAQ Stock Market, which could adversely affect its market price and liquidity.

        We are required to meet NASDAQ's continued listing requirements in order to remain listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market. We are listed on The NASDAQ Global Market. On December 10, 2009, the Company received a letter from The NASDAQ Stock Market providing notice that, for 30 consecutive business days, the Company's common stock had not maintained a minimum market value of publicly held shares ("MVPHS") of $5 million as required for continued inclusion on The NASDAQ Global Market by Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(c). For NASDAQ purposes, MVPHS is the market value of the Company's publicly held shares, which is calculated by subtracting all shares held by officers, directors or beneficial owners of 10% or more of the total shares outstanding. NASDAQ provided the Company until March 10, 2009 to regain compliance with Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(c). Also on December 10, 2009, the Company received a letter from The NASDAQ Stock Market providing notice that, for 30 consecutive business days, the Company's common stock had not maintained a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share as required for continued inclusion on The NASDAQ Global Market by Listing Rule 5450(a)(1). NASDAQ provided the until June 8, 2010 to regain compliance with Listing Rule 5450(a)(1). On February 3, 2010, the NASDAQ provided us with a letter that our common stock had regained compliance with these Listing Rules and both matters were now closed.

        In the future, if our common stock were unable to satisfy The NASDAQ Stock Market's listing standards and we were not able to regain compliance with the listing standards, our stock could be delisted from The NASDAQ Stock Market. If our common stock is delisted, it could be more difficult to buy or sell our common stock and to obtain accurate quotations, and the price of our stock could suffer a material decline. Delisting may also impair our ability to raise capital. Furthermore, if our common stock is delisted, we would apply to have our common stock quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, and our common stock would become subject to the SEC's penny stock regulations. A penny stock, as defined by the Penny Stock Reform Act, is any equity security not traded on a national securities exchange that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. The penny stock regulations generally require that a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith be delivered to purchasers of penny stocks and impose various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. The broker-dealer must make a suitability determination for each purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement prior to the sale. In addition, the broker-dealer must make certain mandated disclosures, including the actual sale or purchase price and actual bid offer quotations, as well as the compensation to be received by the broker-dealer and certain associated persons. The regulations applicable to penny stocks may severely affect the market liquidity for our common stock and could limit your ability to sell your securities in the secondary market.

Risks Related to the Rights Offering

         The future price of the shares of common stock may be less than the $1.15 purchase price per share in the rights offering.

        If you exercise your subscription rights to purchase shares of common stock in the rights offering, you may not be able to sell them later at or above the $1.15 purchase price in the rights offering. The actual market price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among other things, actual or anticipated variations in our costs of doing business, operating results and cash flow, the nature and content of our earnings releases and our competitors' earnings releases, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts, business conditions in our markets and the general state of the securities markets and the market for other financial stocks, changes in capital markets that affect the perceived availability of capital to companies in our industry, governmental legislation or regulation,

43

Table of Contents

currency and exchange rate fluctuations, as well as general economic and market conditions, such as downturns in our economy and recessions.

        Once you exercise your subscription rights, you may not revoke them. If you exercise your subscription rights and, afterwards, the public trading market price of our shares of common stock decreases below the subscription price, you will have committed to buying shares of our common stock at a price above the prevailing market price and could have an immediate unrealized loss. Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the ticker symbol "FMAR," and the last reported sales price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on February 12, 2010 was $1.41 per share. We cannot assure you that the market price of our shares of common stock will not decline after you exercise your subscription rights. Moreover, we cannot assure you that following the exercise of your subscription rights you will be able to sell your common stock at a price equal to or greater than the subscription price.

         The subscription price determined for the rights offering is not an indication of the fair value of our common stock.

        In determining the subscription price, the board of directors considered a number of factors, including: the price at which our shareholders might be willing to participate in the rights offering, historical and current trading prices for our common stock, an analysis of comparable transactions provided by our financial advisor, the need for liquidity and capital and the desire to provide an opportunity to our shareholders to participate in the rights offering on a pro rata basis. In conjunction with its review of these factors, the board of directors also reviewed our history and prospects, including our past and present earnings, our prospects for future earnings, our current financial condition and regulatory status. The per share subscription price is not necessarily related to our book value, net worth or any other established criteria of fair value and may or may not be considered the fair value of our common stock to be offered in the rights offering. After the date of this prospectus, our shares of common stock may trade at prices below the subscription price.

         Stockholders may face significant dilution as a result of the stock offering.

        Other than stockholders who purchase sufficient shares of our common stock in the rights offering, including the exercise of over-subscription rights to the extent sufficient shares are available to maintain their proportionate ownership interest, the issuance of shares of our common stock in the stock offering would dilute, and thereby reduce, each existing stockholder's proportionate ownership interest in our shares of common stock. The dilutive effect of the stock offering may have an adverse impact on the market price of the Company's common stock.

        Although we reserve the right to negotiate and enter into standby purchase agreements with standby purchasers following the effectiveness of this prospectus, we may not enter into any such agreements, which could impact our ability to raise adequate capital to fund our operations and satisfy our regulatory capital goals.

        We intend to negotiate and enter into standby purchase agreements with standby purchasers following the effectiveness of this prospectus; however, we cannot guarantee that we will successfully negotiate and enter into such agreements. In the event we do not enter into standby purchase agreements, our capital raising efforts could be negatively impacted and as a result, we may not be able to improve our regulatory capital position. We do not currently have written commitments from any third parties to act as standby purchasers or any other guarantees that shareholders and potential investors will purchase any of the shares of common stock offered in this rights offering or otherwise. Accordingly, we may not be able to raise sufficient additional capital to continue to fund our operations.

44

Table of Contents

         We could, as a result of the stock offering or future trading activity in our common stock, experience an "ownership change" for tax purposes that could cause us to permanently lose a portion of its U.S. federal deferred tax assets.

        The completion of the stock offering could cause us to experience an "ownership change" as defined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Even if these transactions do not cause us to experience an "ownership change," these transactions materially increase the risk that we could experience an "ownership change" in the future. As a result, issuances or sales of common stock or other securities in the future (including common stock issued in the stock offering), or certain other direct or indirect changes in ownership, could result in an "ownership change" under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In the event an "ownership change" were to occur, we could realize a permanent loss or a portion of its U.S. federal deferred tax assets as a result of limitations on certain built-in losses that have not been recognized for tax purposes, including, for example, losses on existing nonperforming assets. The amount of the permanent loss would depend on the size of the annual limitation (which is in part a function of our market capitalization at the time of an ownership change) and the applicable carry-forward period (U.S. federal net operating losses generally may be carried forward for a period of 20 years). Any permanent loss could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

        We have not established a valuation allowance against our U.S. federal deferred tax assets of September 30, 2009, as we believed, based on our analysis as of that date, that it was more likely than not that all of these assets would be realized. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes restrictions on the use of a corporation's net operating losses, certain recognized built-in losses and other carryovers after an "ownership change" occurs. An "ownership change" is generally a greater than 50 percentage point increase by certain "5% shareholders" during the testing period, which is generally the three year-period ending on the transaction date. Upon an "ownership change," a corporation generally is subject to an annual limitation on its pre-change losses and certain recognized built-in losses equal to the value of the corporation's market capitalization immediately before the "ownership change" multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt rate (subject to certain adjustments). The annual limitation is increased each year to the extent that there is an unused limitation in a prior year. Since U.S. federal net operating losses generally may be carried forward for up to 20 years, the annual limitation also effectively provides a cap on the cumulative amount of pre-change losses and certain recognized built-in losses that may be utilized. Pre-change losses and certain recognized built-in losses in excess of the cap are effectively lost.

        The relevant calculations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code are technical and highly complex. The stock offering, combined with other ownership changes in recent years, could cause First Mariner to experience an "ownership change." If an "ownership change" were to occur, we believe it could permanently lose the ability to realize a portion of its deferred tax asset, resulting in reduction to our total shareholders' equity. This could also decrease the Bank's regulatory capital. We do not believe, however, that any such decrease in regulatory capital would be material because, among other things, only a small portion of the federal deferred tax asset is currently included in the Bank's regulatory capital.

         You may not revoke your exercise of rights; we may terminate the rights offering.

        Once you have exercised your subscription rights, you may not revoke your exercise even if you learn information about us that you consider to be unfavorable. We may terminate the rights offering at our discretion, including without limitation if we fail to sell at least 8,695,653 shares and raise at least $10.0 million in the stock offering. If we terminate the rights offering, neither we nor the subscription agent will have any obligation to you with respect to the rights except to return any payment received by the subscription agent, without interest or penalty.

45

Table of Contents

         You will not be able to sell the shares you buy in the rights offering until you receive your stock certificates or your account is credited with the shares of common stock.

        If you purchase shares of our common stock in the rights offering by submitting a rights certificate and payment, we will mail you a stock certificate as soon as practicable after [EXPIRATION DATE], or such later date as to which the rights offering may be extended. If your shares are held by a custodian bank, broker, dealer or other nominee and you purchase shares of our common stock, your account with your nominee will be credited with the shares of common stock you purchased in the rights offering as soon as practicable after the expiration of the rights offering, or such later date as to which the rights offering may be extended. Until your stock certificates have been delivered or your account is credited, you may not be able to sell your shares even though the common stock issued in the rights offering will be listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Market. The stock price may decline between the time you decide to sell your shares and the time you are actually able to sell your shares.

         Although publicly traded, our common stock has substantially less liquidity than the average liquidity of stocks listed on the NASDAQ Global Market.

        Although our common stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Market our common stock has substantially less liquidity than the average liquidity for companies listed on the NASDAQ Global Market. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of our common stock at any given time. This marketplace depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. This limited market may affect your ability to sell your shares on short notice, and the sale of a large number of shares at one time could temporarily depress the market price of our common stock. For these reasons, our common stock should not be viewed as a short-term investment.

        The market price of our common stock may fluctuate in the future, and this volatility may be unrelated to our performance. General market price declines or overall market swings in the future could adversely affect the price of our common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices.

         We have broad discretion in the use of proceeds of the stock offering.

        Other than an investment in the Bank, we have not designated the anticipated net proceeds of the stock offering for specific uses. Accordingly, our management will have considerable discretion in the application of the net proceeds of the stock offering and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. See "Use of Proceeds."

46

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        Some of our statements contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this prospectus are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. When we use words like "may," "plan," "contemplate," "anticipate," "believe," "intend," "continue," "expect," "project," "predict," "estimate," "target," "could," "is likely," "should," "would," "will," and similar expressions, you should consider them as identifying forward-looking statements, although we may use other phrasing. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on our beliefs and assumptions, and on the information available to us at the time that these disclosures were prepared. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

•

the unfavorable effects of future economic conditions, including inflation, recession or a continuing decrease in real estate values;



•

the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of our allowance for loan losses, that may prove to be materially incorrect or may not be borne out by subsequent events;



•

the success and timing of our business strategies and our ability to effectively carry out our business plan;



•

our inability to realize the benefits from our cost saving initiatives, branch sales and/or branch closings;



•

our inability to continue to operate as a going concern;



•

increased loan delinquencies;



•

an escalation in problem assets and foreclosures;



•

a decline in demand for our products and services;



•

a reduction in the value of the collateral for loans made by us, especially real estate, which, in turn would likely reduce our customers' borrowing power and the value of assets and collateral associated with our existing loans;



•

a reduction in the value of certain assets held by us;



•

an inability to meet our liquidity needs;



•

an inability to raise sufficient capital to comply with the requirements of our regulators and for continued support of operations;



•

adverse changes in the securities' markets;



•

changes in governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes;



•

the risks of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand and the values of loan collateral, securities and interest sensitive assets and liabilities;



•

the imposition of additional enforcement action by bank regulatory authorities upon First Mariner Bank or First Mariner;



•

governmental action as a result of our inability to comply with regulatory orders and agreements;

47

Table of Contents

•

the effects of terrorism and efforts to combat it;



•

our ability to effectively manage market risk, credit risk and operational risk;



•

the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in our market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone and the Internet;



•

our ability to successfully implement our capital plan;



•

our ability to obtain shareholder approve to conduct and to successfully complete the Exchange;



•

our ability to successfully enter into and consummate the transactions contemplated by any agreements with standby purchasers to purchase shares not otherwise acquired in the rights offering;



•

our ability to successfully implement our plan to reduce the Bank's risk exposure on each asset classified as "Substandard";



•

our ability to successfully implement our liquidity contingency plan;



•

the effect of an impairment charge on our deferred tax asset;



•

the effect of any mergers, acquisitions or other transactions to which we or our subsidiaries may from time to time be a party, including our ability to successfully integrate any businesses that we acquire; and



•

the risks described in this prospectus and our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

        All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this Cautionary Note. Our actual results may differ significantly from those we discuss in these forward-looking statements. For other factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from estimates and projections contained in these forward-looking statements, please read the "Risk Factors" section of this prospectus. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date which such statement was made, and, except as required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

48

Table of Contents

USE OF PROCEEDS

        Although we cannot determine what the actual net proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock in the stock offering will be until the stock offering are completed, we estimate that the aggregate net proceeds from the stock offering, after deducting estimated offering expenses, will be between $             million and $             million. Other than an investment in the Bank to improve its capital position and the Company's consolidated capital position, we currently have no arrangements or understandings regarding any specific use of proceeds.

        The net proceeds may vary because total expenses relating to the offering may be more or less than our estimates.

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

Common Stock

        We are currently authorized to issue seventy-five million (75,000,000) shares of common stock, $0.05 par value. There were 6,452,631 shares of common stock outstanding as of as of February 12, 2010.

Dividend Rights

        Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by our board of directors out of legally available funds, and to receive pro rata any assets distributable to holders of our common stock upon our liquidation.

        On December 22, 2008, we announced that we were electing to suspend interest payments on the debentures relating to the Trust Preferred Securities beginning with the January 7, 2009 interest payment. Under the terms of the debentures, if we defers the payment of interest on the debentures, we generally may not pay dividends or distributions, or redeem, purchase, or make a liquidation payment with respect to any of our capital stock. We are entitled to defer interest payments on the Trust Preferred Securities for up to 20 consecutive quarters Additionally, pursuant to the September Order, we may not declare or pay a dividend, including the repurchase or redemption of capital stock, without the prior written consent of the FDIC and the Commissioner.

Voting Rights

        Holders of our common stock are entitled to vote for the election of directors and upon all other matters, which may be submitted to a vote of shareholders generally, with each share being entitled to one vote. Our common shareholders do not possess cumulative voting rights.

        Any corporate action requiring shareholder approval shall be authorized by a majority of the votes cast at the meeting unless otherwise provided by the Maryland General Corporation Law, First Mariner's Articles or Bylaws.

Liquidation Rights

        In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of First Mariner, the holders of our common stock would be entitled to receive, after payment or provision for payment of all our debts and liabilities, all of our assets available for distribution. Holders of our serial preferred stock, if any such shares are then outstanding, may have a priority over the holders of common stock in the event of any liquidation or dissolution. We have no serial preferred stock currently outstanding.

Other Rights

        Common shareholders have no preemptive rights to purchase additional securities that may be issued by us in the future. There are no redemption or conversion provisions applicable to our common stock, and common shareholders are not liable for any further capital call or assessment.

Transfer Agent

        The registrar and transfer agent for First Mariner's common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC.

49

Table of Contents

MARKET FOR THE COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

        First Mariner's shares of common stock trade on the NASDAQ Global Market under the trading symbol "FMAR."

        The development of a public market having the desirable characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the existence of willing buyers and sellers, the presence of which is not within our control or that of any market maker. The number of active buyers and sellers of our common stock at any particular time may be limited, which may have an adverse effect on the price at which our common stock can be sold. There can be no assurance that persons purchasing the common stock will be able to sell their shares at or above the $1.15 price per share in the stock offering. Purchasers of our common stock should have long-term investment intent and should recognize that there may be a limited trading market in our common stock.

        The following table sets forth the high and low trading prices for shares of our common stock and cash dividends paid per share for the periods indicated. As of February 12, 2010, there were 6,452,631 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

        On February 12, 2010, the most recent practicable date before the date of this prospectus, the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market was $1.41 per share. As of the close of business on the record date, February 12, 2010, First Mariner had approximately      shareholders of record. This number does not include the number of persons or entities that hold our common stock in nominee or "street" name through various brokerage firms, banks and other nominees.

        We do not pay cash dividends on our shares of common stock. Currently, we have no plans to resume the payment of cash dividends on our shares of common stock.

        First Mariner's ability to pay dividends is largely dependent upon the receipt of dividends from the Bank. Both federal and state laws impose restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. For a Maryland chartered bank or trust company, dividends may be paid out of undivided profits or, with the prior approval of the Commissioner, from surplus in excess of 100% of required capital stock. If, however, the surplus of a Maryland bank is less than 100% of its required capital stock, cash dividends may not be paid in excess of 90% of net earnings. In addition to these specific restrictions, bank regulatory agencies also have the ability to prohibit proposed dividends by a financial institution which would otherwise be permitted under applicable regulations if the regulatory body determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. As noted earlier, First Mariner and First Mariner Bank have entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, and are

50

Table of Contents

subject to Cease and Desist Orders by the FDIC and the Commissioner that, among other things, require us to obtain the prior approval of our regulators before paying a dividend or otherwise making a distribution on our stock. In addition, First Mariner elected to defer regularly scheduled quarterly interest payments on its junior subordinated debentures issued in connection with its Trust Preferred Securities. First Mariner is prohibited from paying any dividends or making any other distribution on its common stock for so long as interest payments on its Trust Preferred Securities are being deferred.

51

Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION

        The following table presents our historical consolidated capitalization at September 30, 2009 and our pro forma consolidated capitalization after giving effect to the receipt of net proceeds from the stock offering, assuming in the alternative that the minimum and maximum of the offered shares are sold. The table also sets forth the historical regulatory capital ratios of First Mariner Bank and First Mariner Bancorp, Inc. at September 30, 2009, and the pro forma regulatory capital ratios of First Mariner Bank and First Mariner Bancorp, Inc., including the receipt by First Mariner Bank of $       million of net proceeds from the stock offering, that the initial cash proceeds of approximately $8.5 million from the sale of Mariner Finance were down-streamed to the Bank, and assuming that $       million of the proceeds received by First Mariner Bank were invested in assets with a risk weighting of 20%, and $       million were invested in assets with a risk weighting of 50% ($ in thousands).

(1)

The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after the stock offering is based on the number of shares outstanding as of February 12, 2010 and excludes 668,593 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options on such date, at a weighted average exercise price of $12.19.

(2)

The table also reflects the pro forma impact of the proposed Exchange pursuant to which First Mariner would eliminate $20.0 million aggregate liquidation amount of trust preferred securities in exchange for $2.0 million of common stock and warrants to purchase up to an additional 20% of such shares of common stock.

52

Table of Contents

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

        The summary financial information presented below is derived in part from the consolidated financial statements of First Mariner. The information at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements of First Mariner incorporated by reference into this prospectus. The information at December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the years then ended is derived in part from audited consolidated financial statements that do not appear in this prospectus. The information at and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are derived from our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference into this prospectus. In the opinion of our management, such amounts contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position and results of operations for such periods in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our results for the nine months are not necessarily indicative of our results of operations that may be expected for any future period.

Operating Data:

53

Table of Contents

Other Data: