SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
OR
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-17820
LAKELAND BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey | 22-2953275 | |||||
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |||||
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |||||
250 Oak Ridge Road, Oak Ridge, New Jersey | 07438 | |||||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |||||
(973) 697-2000 | ||||||
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) | ||||||
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, any Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act: (Check one):
Large accelerated filer [ ] | Accelerated filer [X] | Non-accelerated filer [ ] | Smaller reporting Company [ ] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.):
Yes [ ] No [ X ]
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of April 30, 2012 there were 26,965,019 outstanding shares of Common Stock, no par value.
Form 10-Q Index
Signatures | 40 | |||||
The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a web site which contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information relating to registrants that file electronically at the address: http:/ / www.sec.gov. |
2
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
March 31, 2012 (unaudited |
) |
|
December 31, 2011 |
| |||||
|
||||||||||
ASSETS: |
|
(dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts) |
| |||||||
Cash |
$79,877 | $60,688 | ||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits due from banks |
6,944 | 11,870 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
86,821 | 72,558 | ||||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
446,113 | 463,611 | ||||||||
Investment securities held to maturity; fair value of $71,601 in 2012 and $74,274 in 2011 |
69,231 | 71,700 | ||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
7,417 | 8,333 | ||||||||
Loans, net of deferred costs |
2,073,466 | 2,041,575 | ||||||||
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses |
28,700 | 28,416 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
Net loans |
2,044,766 | 2,013,159 | ||||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
29,108 | 27,917 | ||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
8,503 | 8,369 | ||||||||
Goodwill |
87,111 | 87,111 | ||||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
45,099 | 44,760 | ||||||||
Other assets |
28,178 | 28,432 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$2,852,347 | $2,825,950 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||
Noninterest bearing |
$476,349 | $449,560 | ||||||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
1,473,051 | 1,440,541 | ||||||||
Time deposits under $100 thousand |
206,766 | 211,797 | ||||||||
Time deposits $100 thousand and over |
131,962 | 147,755 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
Total deposits |
2,288,128 | 2,249,653 | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
96,453 | 72,131 | ||||||||
Other borrowings |
135,000 | 155,000 | ||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
77,322 | 77,322 | ||||||||
Other liabilities |
13,489 | 12,061 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
2,610,392 | 2,566,167 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||
Preferred stock, Series A, no par value, $1,000 liquidation value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued 0 shares at March 31, 2012 and 19,000 shares at December 31, 2011 |
--- | 18,480 | ||||||||
Common stock, no par value; authorized shares, 40,000,000; issued 27,275,480 shares at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 |
278,509 | 270,044 | ||||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(35,593 | ) | (26,061 | ) | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 312,654 shares at March 31, 2012 and 439,340 at December 31, 2011 |
(3,947 | ) | (5,551 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
2,986 | 2,871 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
241,955 | 259,783 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$2,852,347 | $2,825,950 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
3
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME - UNAUDITED
For the three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|
||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
INTEREST INCOME |
||||||||
Loans, leases and fees |
$25,458 | $26,665 | ||||||
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks |
6 | 12 | ||||||
Taxable investment securities and other |
2,340 | 2,713 | ||||||
Tax-exempt investment securities |
490 | 499 | ||||||
|
||||||||
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME |
28,294 | 29,889 | ||||||
|
||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE |
||||||||
Deposits |
2,256 | 2,931 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
28 | 27 | ||||||
Other borrowings |
2,064 | 2,347 | ||||||
|
||||||||
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE |
4,348 | 5,305 | ||||||
|
||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
23,946 | 24,584 | ||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
4,556 | 4,927 | ||||||
|
||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER |
||||||||
PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
19,390 | 19,657 | ||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME |
||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
2,447 | 2,478 | ||||||
Commissions and fees |
980 | 832 | ||||||
Gains on investment securities |
32 | --- | ||||||
Income on bank owned life insurance |
339 | 355 | ||||||
Gains on leasing related assets |
184 | 463 | ||||||
Other income |
75 | 102 | ||||||
|
||||||||
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME |
4,057 | 4,230 | ||||||
|
||||||||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
9,435 | 8,986 | ||||||
Net occupancy expense |
1,688 | 1,911 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment |
1,083 | 1,164 | ||||||
Stationery, supplies and postage |
336 | 365 | ||||||
Marketing expense |
470 | 615 | ||||||
Core deposit intangible amortization |
--- | 265 | ||||||
FDIC insurance expense |
555 | 947 | ||||||
Collection expense |
139 | 65 | ||||||
Legal expense |
399 | 295 | ||||||
Expenses on other real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
38 | 272 | ||||||
Other expenses |
2,132 | 2,141 | ||||||
|
||||||||
TOTAL NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
16,275 | 17,026 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
7,172 | 6,861 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
2,201 | 2,090 | ||||||
|
||||||||
NET INCOME |
$4,971 | $4,771 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Dividends on Preferred Stock and Accretion |
620 | 1,286 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders |
$4,351 | $3,485 | ||||||
|
||||||||
PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK |
||||||||
Basic earnings |
$0.16 | $0.13 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Diluted earnings |
$0.16 | $0.13 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Dividends |
$0.06 | $0.06 | ||||||
|
||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements |
4
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME-UNAUDITED
For the three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|
||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
NET INCOME |
$4,971 | $4,771 | ||||||
|
||||||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME NET OF TAX: |
||||||||
Unrealized securities gains during period |
131 | 876 | ||||||
Less: reclassification for gains included in net income |
21 | --- | ||||||
Change in pension liability, net |
5 | 4 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income |
115 | 880 | ||||||
|
||||||||
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
$5,086 | $5,651 | ||||||
|
||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements |
5
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY - UNAUDITED
Three Months ended March 31, 2012
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock | Series A | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Preferred | Accumulated | Treasury | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Stock | deficit | Stock | Income | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE January 1, 2012 |
25,976,648 | $270,044 | $18,480 | ($26,061 | ) | ($5,551 | ) | $2,871 | $259,783 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
4,971 | 4,971 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
115 | 115 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends |
(100 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount |
520 | (520 | ) | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
178 | 178 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred stock |
(19,000 | ) | (19,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrant Repurchase |
(2,800 | ) | (2,800 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment for stock dividend |
1,298,832 | 12,345 | (12,345 | ) | --- | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock awards |
(1,153 | ) | 1,153 | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock to dividend reinvestment |
(123 | ) | (251 | ) | 451 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options, net of excess |
18 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends, common stock |
(1,287 | ) | (1,287 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE March 31, 2012 |
27,275,480 | $278,509 | $0 | ($35,593 | ) | ($3,947 | ) | $2,986 | $241,955 | |||||||||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
|
6
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED
For the three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
(dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Net income |
$4,971 | $4,771 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Net amortization of premiums, discounts and deferred loan fees and costs |
1,803 | 1,514 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
715 | 1,010 | ||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
4,556 | 4,927 | ||||||
Gains on securities |
(32 | ) | --- | |||||
Gains on leases |
--- | (382 | ) | |||||
Gains on sales of other assets |
(27 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation |
178 | 155 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(144 | ) | 1,737 | |||||
Increase in other liabilities |
1,555 | 2,791 | ||||||
|
||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
13,575 | 16,488 | ||||||
|
||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Proceeds from repayments on and maturity of securities: |
||||||||
Available for sale |
36,189 | 46,649 | ||||||
Held to maturity |
8,030 | 3,166 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities |
||||||||
Available for sale |
16,540 | --- | ||||||
Purchase of securities: |
||||||||
Available for sale |
(36,483 | ) | (32,196 | ) | ||||
Held to maturity |
(5,607 | ) | (6,701 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
916 | 2,911 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of leases |
--- | 16,433 | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans and leases |
(36,731 | ) | 15,843 | |||||
Proceeds from sales of other repossessed assets |
154 | 769 | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
(1,906 | ) | (991 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(18,898 | ) | 45,883 | |||||
|
||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
38,475 | 42,623 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
24,322 | (5,741 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from other borrowings |
130,000 | 15,000 | ||||||
Repayments of other borrowings |
(150,000 | ) | (80,000 | ) | ||||
Redemption of preferred stock and common stock warrant |
(21,800 | ) | (20,000 | ) | ||||
Exercise of stock options |
--- | 57 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits |
18 | 16 | ||||||
Issuance of stock to dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan |
77 | 148 | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(1,506 | ) | (1,790 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
19,586 | (49,687 | ) | |||||
|
||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
14,263 | 12,684 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
72,558 | 49,278 | ||||||
|
||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$86,821 | $61,962 | ||||||
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation.
This quarterly report presents the consolidated financial statements of Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) and its subsidiary, Lakeland Bank (Lakeland). The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and predominant practices within the banking industry.
The Companys unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, such as normal recurring accruals that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair statement of the results of the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the quarter presented do not necessarily indicate the results that the Company will achieve for all of 2012. You should read these interim financial statements in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes that are presented in the Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The financial information in this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with the Companys customary accounting practices. Certain information and footnote disclosures required under U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted, as permitted by rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
On March 19, 2012, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a 5% stock dividend which was distributed on April 16, 2012 to holders of record as of March 30, 2012. All weighted average, actual share and per share information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been adjusted retroactively for the effects of the stock dividend.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statements to conform to the 2012 presentation.
Note 2. Stock-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation expense of $178,000 and $155,000 was recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, there was unrecognized compensation cost of $1.8 million related to unvested restricted stock; that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.3 years. Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was approximately $38,000 as of March 31, 2012 and is expected to be recognized over a period of 2.2 years.
In the first three months of 2012, the Company granted 91,269 shares of restricted stock at a grant date fair value of $9.50 per share under the Companys 2009 equity compensation program. These shares vest over a five year period. Compensation expense on these shares is expected to average approximately $173,000 per year for the next five years. In the first three months of 2011, the Company granted 100,112 shares of restricted stock at a grant date fair value of $9.40 per share under the 2009 program. Compensation expense on these shares is expected to average approximately $188,000 per year over a five year period.
There were no grants of stock options in the first three months of 2012 and 2011.
8
Option activity under the Companys stock option plans is as follows:
Number of shares |
Weighted average exercise price |
Weighted average ( in years) |
Aggregate intrinsic value |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Outstanding, January 1, 2012 |
598,477 | $12.57 | $- - - | |||||||||||||
Issued |
- - - | - - - | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
- - - | - - - | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
- - - | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2012 |
598,477 | $12.57 | 2.84 | $31,825 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Options exercisable at March 31, 2012 |
576,427 | $12.70 | 2.66 | $12,676 | ||||||||||||
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the first three months of 2012 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options).
There were no options exercised in the first quarter of 2012. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $41,000. Exercise of stock options during the first three months of 2011 resulted in cash receipts of $57,000.
Information regarding the Companys restricted stock (all unvested) and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2012 is as follows:
Number of shares |
Weighted average price |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Outstanding, January 1, 2012 |
172,772 | $ | 8.96 | |||||
Granted |
91,269 | 9.50 | ||||||
Vested |
(20,552 | ) | 6.82 | |||||
Forfeited |
(277 | ) | 9.07 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2012 |
243,212 | $ | 9.34 | |||||
|
|
9
Note 3. Comprehensive Income
The components of other comprehensive income are as follows:
March 31, 2012 | March 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For the quarter ended: | Before tax amount |
Tax Benefit (Expense) |
Net of tax amount |
Before tax amount |
Tax Benefit (Expense) |
Net of tax amount |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains on available for sale securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized holding gains arising during period |
$194 | ($63 | ) | $131 | $1,364 | ($488 | ) | $876 | ||||||||||||||||
Less reclassification adjustment for net gains arising during the period |
32 | (11 | ) | 21 | --- | --- | --- | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) |
$162 | ($52 | ) | $110 | $1,364 | ($488 | ) | $876 | ||||||||||||||||
Change in minimum pension liability |
8 | (3 | ) | 5 | 7 | (3 | ) | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net |
$170 | ($55 | ) | $115 | $1,371 | ($491 | ) | $880 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Statement of Cash Flow Information, Supplemental Information
For the three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
(in thousands) | |||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
$517 | $569 | ||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
4,406 | 5,301 | ||||||
Transfer of loans and leases into other repossessed assets and other real estate owned |
259 | 871 | ||||||
Transfer of leases held for sale to leases held for investment |
0 | 1,517 |
10
Note 5. Earnings Per Share
All weighted average, actual share and per share information set forth in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 have been adjusted retroactively for the effects of the stock dividend distributed on April 16, 2012. The following schedule shows the Companys earnings per share for the periods presented:
For the three months ended March 31, |
||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$4,351 | $3,485 | ||||||
Less: earnings allocated to participating securities |
36 | 24 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net income allocated to common shareholders |
$4,315 | $3,461 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic (1) |
26,700 | 26,511 | ||||||
Share-based plans (1) |
47 | 140 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Weighted average number of common shares - diluted (1) |
26,747 | 26,651 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$0.16 | $0.13 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$0.16 | $0.13 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
(1) Adjusted for 5% stock dividend distributed April 16, 2012 to shareholders of record on March 30, 2012. |
Options to purchase 570,914 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $12.79 per share were outstanding and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 because the exercise price was greater than the average market price. Options to purchase 737,275 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $12.35 per share and 65,137 shares of restricted stock at a weighted average price of $9.44 per share were outstanding and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 because the exercise price and the grant-date price were greater than the average market price.
11
Note 6. Investment Securities
AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies |
$38,172 | $67 | $(69 | ) | $38,170 | $43,463 | $140 | --- | $43,603 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
335,628 | 5,129 | (650 | ) | 340,107 | 344,938 | 5,014 | (428 | ) | 349,524 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
34,326 | 1,607 | (82 | ) | 35,851 | 34,102 | 1,875 | (9 | ) | 35,968 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities |
17,551 | 175 | (950 | ) | 16,776 | 20,965 | 72 | (1,320 | ) | 19,717 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
14,674 | 549 | (14 | ) | 15,209 | 14,543 | 306 | (50 | ) | 14,799 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$440,351 | $7,527 | $(1,765 | ) | $446,113 | $458,011 | $7,407 | $(1,807 | ) | $463,611 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HELD TO MATURITY |
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies |
$13,998 | $57 | $(64 | ) | $13,991 | $9,005 | $134 | $--- | $9,139 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
19,138 | 1,097 | (3 | ) | 20,232 | 20,577 | 1,148 | (1 | ) | 21,724 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
34,539 | 1,196 | (31 | ) | 35,704 | 40,559 | 1,305 | (9 | ) | 41,855 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities |
1,556 | 118 | --- | 1,674 | 1,559 | 72 | (75 | ) | 1,556 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$69,231 | $2,468 | $(98 | ) | $71,601 | $71,700 | $2,659 | $(85 | ) | $74,274 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following table shows investment securities by stated maturity. Securities backed by mortgages have expected maturities that differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to call or prepay, and are, therefore, classified separately with no specific maturity date (in thousands):
March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale | Held to Maturity | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Value | Cost | Value | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 5,975 | $ | 6,021 | $ | 13,542 | $ | 13,599 | ||||||||
Due after one year through five years |
43,598 | 43,764 | 14,738 | 15,390 | ||||||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
35,333 | 36,323 | 18,646 | 19,181 | ||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
5,143 | 4,689 | 3,167 | 3,199 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
90,049 | 90,797 | 50,093 | 51,369 | |||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
335,628 | 340,107 | 19,138 | 20,232 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
14,674 | 15,209 | --- | --- | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Total securities |
$ | 440,351 | $ | 446,113 | $ | 69,231 | $ | 71,601 | ||||||||
|
12
The following table shows proceeds from sales of securities, gross gains and gross losses on sales or calls of securities and other than temporary impairments for the periods indicated (in thousands):
For the three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Sale proceeds |
$16,540 | $--- | ||||||
Gross gains |
99 | --- | ||||||
Gross losses |
(67 | ) | --- | |||||
Other than temporary impairment |
--- | --- |
Gains or losses on sales of investment securities are based on the net proceeds and the adjusted carrying amount of the securities sold using the specific identification method.
Securities with a carrying value of approximately $325.3 million and $343.7 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required by applicable laws and regulations.
The following table indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
March 31, 2012 | Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Number of | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
Fair value | Losses | Fair value | Losses | securities | Fair value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies |
$9,928 | $69 | $--- | $--- | 2 | $9,928 | $69 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
66,019 | 635 | 4,108 | 15 | 17 | 70,127 | 650 | |||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
1,971 | 82 | --- | --- | 5 | 1,971 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities |
590 | 10 | 6,012 | 940 | 4 | 6,602 | 950 | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
4,312 | 14 | --- | --- | 1 | 4,312 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$82,820 | $810 | $10,120 | $955 | 29 | $92,940 | $1,765 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HELD TO MATURITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies |
$4,928 | $64 | $--- | $--- | 1 | $4,928 | $64 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
1,501 | 3 | --- | --- | 1 | $1,501 | $3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
675 | 24 | 395 | 7 | 4 | 1,070 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$7,104 | $91 | $395 | $7 | 6 | $7,499 | $98 |
13
December 31, 2011 | Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Number of | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
Fair value | Losses | Fair value | Losses | securities | Fair value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies |
$--- | $--- | $--- | $--- | 0 | $--- | $--- | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
81,067 | 398 | 9,201 | 30 | 23 | 90,268 | 428 | |||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
2,171 | 9 | 20 | --- | 5 | 2,191 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities |
467 | 12 | 5,645 | 1,308 | 4 | 6,112 | 1,320 | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
5,043 | 50 | --- | --- | 4 | 5,043 | 50 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$88,748 | $469 | $14,866 | $1,338 | 36 | $103,614 | $1,807 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HELD TO MATURITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$1,513 | $1 | $--- | $--- | 1 | $1,513 | $1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
790 | 2 | 395 | 7 | 4 | 1,185 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities |
957 | 75 | --- | --- | 2 | 957 | 75 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$3,260 | $78 | $395 | $7 | 7 | $3,655 | $85 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Management has evaluated the securities in the above table and has concluded that none of the securities with unrealized losses have impairments that are other-than-temporary. In its evaluation, management considered the credit rating on the securities and the results of discounted cash flow analyses. All investment securities are evaluated on a periodic basis to determine if factors are identified that would require further analysis. In evaluating the Companys securities, management considers the following items:
| The credit ratings of the underlying issuer and if any changes in the credit rating have occurred; |
| The Companys ability and intent to hold the securities, including an evaluation of the need to sell the security to meet certain liquidity measures, or whether the Company has sufficient levels of cash to hold the identified security in order to recover the entire amortized cost of the security; |
| The length of time the securitys fair value has been less than amortized cost; and |
| Adverse conditions related to the security or its issuer if the issuer has failed to make scheduled payments or other factors. |
Note 7. Loans and Leases.
The following sets forth the composition of Lakelands loan and lease portfolio as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| ||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
$ | 1,042,595 | $1,012,982 | |||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
219,270 | 209,915 | ||||||
Leases |
26,214 | 28,879 | ||||||
Real estate-residential mortgage |
412,027 | 406,222 | ||||||
Real estate-construction |
71,447 | 79,138 | ||||||
Home equity and consumer |
301,974 | 304,190 | ||||||
| ||||||||
Total loans |
2,073,527 | 2,041,326 | ||||||
| ||||||||
Plus: deferred costs |
(61 | ) | 249 | |||||
| ||||||||
Loans, net of deferred costs |
$ | 2,073,466 | $2,041,575 | |||||
|
14
Non-Performing Assets and Past Due Loans
The following schedule sets forth certain information regarding the Companys non-performing assets and its accruing troubled debt restructurings:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
$12,617 | $16,578 | ||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
5,611 | 4,608 | ||||||
Leases |
621 | 575 | ||||||
Real estateresidential mortgage |
9,943 | 11,610 | ||||||
Real estateconstruction |
10,502 | 12,393 | ||||||
Home equity and consumer |
2,725 | 3,252 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total non-accrual loans and leases |
$42,019 | $49,016 | ||||||
Other real estate and other repossessed assets |
1,314 | 1,182 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
TOTAL NON-PERFORMING ASSETS |
$43,333 | $50,198 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Troubled debt restructurings, still accruing |
$8,744 | $8,856 | ||||||
|
|
Non-accrual loans included $4.3 million and $4.6 million of troubled debt restructurings as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
An age analysis of past due loans, segregated by class of loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, are as follows:
March 31, 2012 |
|
30-59 Days Past Due |
|
|
60-89 Days Past Due |
|
|
Greater Than 89 Days |
|
|
Total Past Due |
|
Current |
|
Total Loans and Leases |
|
|
Recorded Investment greater than 89 Days and still accruing |
| |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate | $ | 3,018 | $ | 2,343 | $ | 13,349 | $ | 18,710 | $ | 1,023,885 | $ | 1,042,595 | $ | 732 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other | 735 | 460 | 5,711 | 6,906 | 212,364 | 219,270 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Leases | 304 | 143 | 621 | 1,068 | 25,146 | 26,214 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Real estateresidential mortgage | 1,942 | 604 | 11,136 | 13,682 | 398,345 | 412,027 | 1,193 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Real estateconstruction | 100 | - | 10,502 | 10,602 | 60,845 | 71,447 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer | 2,682 | 484 | 3,043 | 6,209 | 295,765 | 301,974 | 318 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 8,781 | $ | 4,034 | $ | 44,362 | $ | 57,177 | $ | 2,016,350 | $ | 2,073,527 | $ | 2,343 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
$ | 3,638 | $ | 1,731 | $ | 16,578 | $ | 21,947 | $ | 991,035 | $ | 1,012,982 | $ | - | ||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
512 | 49 | 4,608 | 5,169 | 204,746 | 209,915 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Leases |
397 | 164 | 575 | 1,136 | 27,743 | 28,879 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate--residential mortgage |
3,059 | 1,235 | 12,818 | 17,112 | 389,110 | 406,222 | 1,208 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate--construction |
- | - | 12,393 | 12,393 | 66,745 | 79,138 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
2,350 | 448 | 3,411 | 6,209 | 297,981 | 304,190 | 159 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 9,956 | $ | 3,627 | $ | 50,383 | $ | 63,966 | $ | 1,977,360 | $ | 2,041,326 | $ | 1,367 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
15
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans as of March 31, 2012, March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:
March 31, 2012 | Recorded Impaired loans |
Contractual Unpaid Principal Balance |
Specific Allowance |
Interest Income Recognized |
Average Investment in Impaired loans |
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans without specific allowance: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
$16,795 | $22,849 | $- | $103 | $17,684 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
4,887 | 9,056 | - | - | 4,180 | |||||||||||||||
Leases |
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-residential mortgage |
377 | 377 | - | 6 | 378 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-construction |
10,013 | 14,488 | - | - | 11,051 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
350 | 350 | - | - | 312 | |||||||||||||||
Loans with specific allowance: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
3,556 | 5,874 | 355 | 10 | 4,040 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
776 | 889 | 221 | - | 516 | |||||||||||||||
Leases |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate-residential mortgage |
329 | 337 | 49 | 4 | 482 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-construction |
489 | 1,429 | 49 | - | 522 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
958 | 958 | 144 | 12 | 958 | |||||||||||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
$20,351 | $28,723 | $355 | $113 | $21,724 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
5,663 | 9,945 | 221 | - | 4,696 | |||||||||||||||
Leases |
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Real estate--residential mortgage |
706 | 714 | 49 | 10 | 860 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-construction |
10,502 | 15,917 | 49 | - | 11,573 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
1,308 | 1,308 | 144 | 12 | 1,270 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$38,530 | $56,607 | $818 | $135 | $40,123 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
16
March 31, 2011 | Recorded Investment in Impaired loans |
Contractual Unpaid Principal Balance |
Specific Allowance |
Interest Income Recognized |
Average Investment in Impaired loans |
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans without specific allowance: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
$11,177 | $13,682 | $- | $41 | $11,435 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
- | 2 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||
Leases |
- | 27 | - | - | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-residential mortgage |
415 | 415 | - | - | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-construction |
13,793 | 17,257 | - | 11 | 7,393 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
610 | 610 | - | 5 | 610 | |||||||||||||||
Loans with specific allowance: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
7,377 | 8,431 | 889 | 24 | 5,931 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
974 | 1,115 | 465 | 1 | 1,314 | |||||||||||||||
Leases |
62 | 64 | 47 | - | 61 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-residential mortgage |
397 | 397 | 60 | 4 | 397 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-construction |
36 | 100 | 4 | - | 36 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
636 | 639 | 100 | 8 | 636 | |||||||||||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
$18,554 | $22,113 | $889 | $65 | $17,366 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
974 | 1,117 | 465 | 1 | 1,368 | |||||||||||||||
Leases, including leases held for sale |
62 | 91 | 47 | - | 62 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate--residential mortgage |
812 | 812 | 60 | 4 | 402 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-construction |
13,829 | 17,357 | 4 | 11 | 7,429 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
1,246 | 1,249 | 100 | 13 | 1,246 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$35,477 | $42,739 | $1,565 | $94 | $27,873 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
17
December 31, 2011 | Recorded Impaired loans |
Contractual Unpaid Principal Balance |
Specific Allowance |
Interest Income Recognized |
Average Investment in Impaired loans |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loans without specific allowance: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
$19,648 | $24,922 | $- | $332 | $14,792 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
4,074 | 8,155 | - | - | 3,445 | |||||||||||||||
Leases |
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-residential mortgage |
415 | 415 | - | 29 | 542 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-construction |
12,400 | 16,353 | - | 14 | 11,231 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
400 | 485 | - | 1 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Loans with specific allowance: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
3,920 | 6,421 | 392 | 18 | 6,209 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
534 | 647 | 172 | - | 768 | |||||||||||||||
Leases |
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-residential mortgage |
561 | 570 | 75 | 19 | 332 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-construction |
244 | 518 | 24 | - | 333 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
949 | 963 | 142 | 34 | 800 | |||||||||||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
$23,568 | $31,343 | $392 | $350 | $21,001 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
4,608 | 8,802 | 172 | - | 4,213 | |||||||||||||||
Leases |
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Real estateresidential mortgage |
976 | 985 | 75 | 48 | 874 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate-construction |
12,644 | 16,871 | 24 | 14 | 11,564 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
1,349 | 1,448 | 142 | 35 | 814 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$43,145 | $59,449 | $805 | $447 | $38,466 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Interest that would have been accrued on impaired loans and leases during the first three months of 2012 and 2011 had the loans been performing under original terms would have been $812,000 and $567,000, respectively. Interest that would have accrued for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $2.9 million.
Credit Quality Indicators
The classes of loans are determined by internal risk rating. Management closely and continually monitors the quality of its loans and leases and assesses the quantitative and qualitative risks arising from the credit quality of its loans and leases. It is the policy of Lakeland to require that a Credit Risk Rating be assigned to all commercial loans and loan commitments. The Credit Risk Rating System has been developed by management to provide a methodology to be used by Loan Officers, department heads and Senior Management in identifying various levels of credit risk that exist within Lakelands loan portfolios. The risk rating system assists Senior Management in evaluating Lakelands loan portfolio, analyzing trends, and determining the proper level of required reserves to be recommended to the Board. In assigning risk ratings, management considers, among other things, a borrowers debt service coverage, earnings strength, loan to value ratios, industry conditions and economic conditions. Management categorizes loans and commitments into a one (1) to nine (9) numerical structure with rating 1 being the strongest rating and rating 9 being the weakest. Ratings 1 through 5W are considered Pass ratings.
18
The following table shows the Companys commercial loan portfolio as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, by the risk ratings discussed above (in thousands):
March 31, 2012 | Commercial, secured by real estate |
Commercial, industrial and other |
Real estate- construction |
|||||||||
Risk Rating | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
1 |
$--- | $--- | $--- | |||||||||
2 |
--- | 11,408 | --- | |||||||||
3 |
28,611 | 18,123 | 11,175 | |||||||||
4 |
313,276 | 57,842 | 5,964 | |||||||||
5 |
603,080 | 99,939 | 38,740 | |||||||||
5W - Watch |
23,483 | 5,469 | 199 | |||||||||
6 - Other Assets Especially Mentioned |
29,118 | 7,741 | 2,085 | |||||||||
7 - Substandard |
44,856 | 18,748 | 13,039 | |||||||||
8 - Doubtful |
171 | --- | 245 | |||||||||
9 - Loss |
--- | --- | --- | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$1,042,595 | $219,270 | $71,447 | |||||||||
|
|
December 31, 2011 | Commercial, secured by real estate |
Commercial, industrial and other |
Real estate- construction |
|||||||||
Risk Rating | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
1 |
$--- | $--- | $--- | |||||||||
2 |
--- | 11,323 | --- | |||||||||
3 |
26,085 | 17,658 | 11,175 | |||||||||
4 |
301,490 | 48,835 | 14,185 | |||||||||
5 |
575,061 | 95,040 | 36,088 | |||||||||
5W - Watch |
31,648 | 9,346 | 198 | |||||||||
6 - Other Assets Especially Mentioned |
30,666 | 11,708 | 2,315 | |||||||||
7 - Substandard |
47,861 | 16,005 | 14,866 | |||||||||
8 - Doubtful |
171 | --- | 311 | |||||||||
9 - Loss |
--- | --- | --- | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$1,012,982 | $209,915 | $79,138 | |||||||||
|
|
The risk rating tables above do not include consumer or residential loans or leases because they are evaluated on their payment performance status.
19
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The following table details activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses by portfolio segment and the related recorded investment in loans and leases for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011:
Three Months ended March 31, 2012 Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses: |
Commercial, secured by real estate |
Commercial, industrial and other |
Leases | Real estate- residential mortgage |
Real estate- construction |
Home equity and consumer |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$16,618 | $3,477 | $688 | $3,077 | $1,424 | $3,132 | $28,416 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(2,090 | ) | (149 | ) | (168 | ) | (357 | ) | (1,526 | ) | (717 | ) | ($5,007 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Recoveries |
39 | 179 | 378 | 12 | 27 | 100 | $735 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision |
2,891 | 195 | (542 | ) | 499 | 1,386 | 127 | $4,556 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance |
$17,458 | $3,702 | $356 | $3,231 | $1,311 | $2,642 | $28,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance: Individually evaluated for impairment |
$355 | $221 | $--- | $49 | $49 | $144 | $818 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment |
17,103 | 3,481 | 356 | 3,182 | 1,262 | 2,498 | $27,882 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance |
$17,458 | $3,702 | $356 | $3,231 | $1,311 | $2,642 | $28,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans and Leases: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance: Individually evaluated for impairment |
$20,351 | $5,663 | $--- | $706 | $10,502 | $1,308 | $38,530 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment |
1,022,244 | 213,607 | 26,214 | 411,321 | 60,945 | 300,666 | $2,034,997 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance (1) |
$1,042,595 | $219,270 | $26,214 | $412,027 | $71,447 | $301,974 | $2,073,527 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Excludes deferred costs |
20
Year ended December 31, 2011 Allowance for Loan and Lease |
Commercial, secured by real estate |
Commercial, industrial and other |
Leases | Real estate- residential mortgage |
Real estate- construction |
Home equity and consumer |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$11,366 | $5,113 | $3,477 | $2,628 | $2,176 | $2,571 | $27,331 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(5,352 | ) | (5,249 | ) | (2,858 | ) | (1,772 | ) | (3,636 | ) | (3,010 | ) | ($21,877 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Recoveries |
2,084 | 439 | 1,206 | 32 | 67 | 318 | $4,146 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision |
8,520 | 3,174 | (1,137 | ) | 2,189 | 2,817 | 3,253 | $18,816 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance |
$16,618 | $3,477 | $688 | $3,077 | $1,424 | $3,132 | $28,416 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance: Individually evaluated for impairment |
$392 | $172 | $ | $75 | $24 | $142 | $805 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment |
16,226 | 3,305 | 688 | 3,002 | 1,400 | 2,990 | $27,611 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance |
$16,618 | $3,477 | $688 | $3,077 | $1,424 | $3,132 | $28,416 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans and Leases: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance: Individually evaluated for impairment |
$23,568 | $4,608 | $ | $976 | $12,644 | $1,349 | $43,145 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment |
989,414 | 205,307 | 28,879 | 405,246 | 66,494 | 302,841 | $1,998,181 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance(1) |
$1,012,982 | $209,915 | $28,879 | $406,222 | $79,138 | $304,190 | $2,041,326 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Excludes deferred costs |
Lakeland also maintains a reserve for unfunded lending commitments which are included in other liabilities. This reserve was $960,000 and $1,015,000 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company analyzes the adequacy of the reserve for unfunded lending commitments in conjunction with its analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses. For more information on this analysis, see Risk Elements in Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Troubled debt restructurings are those loans where significant concessions have been made due to borrowers financial difficulties. Restructured loans typically involve a modification of terms such as a reduction of the stated interest rate, a moratorium of principal payments and/or an extension of the maturity date at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate of a new loan with similar risk. The Company considers the potential losses on these loans as well as the remainder of its impaired loans while considering the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses.
21
The following table summarizes loans that have been restructured during the periods presented:
For the three months ended | For the three months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 | March 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Contracts |
Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment |
Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment |
Number of Contracts |
Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment |
Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructurings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
3 | $529 | $528 | 1 | $596 | $596 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||||||||||||||||||
Leases |
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate--residential mortgage |
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate--construction |
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | $529 | $528 | 1 | $596 | $596 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The following table summarizes as of March 31, 2012, loans that were restructured within the last 12 months that have subsequently defaulted:
Number of | Recorded | |||||||
Contracts | Investment | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Defaulted Troubled Debt Restructurings: |
||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
4 | $1,484 | ||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
--- | --- | ||||||
Leases |
--- | --- | ||||||
Real estate--residential mortgage |
3 | 706 | ||||||
Real estate--construction |
--- | --- | ||||||
Home equity and consumer |
1 | 350 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
8 | $2,540 | |||||||
|
|
Leases
Lakeland had no leases held for sale as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The following table shows the components of gains on leasing related assets for the periods presented:
For the three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Gains on sales of leases |
$--- | $143 | ||||||
Realized gains on paid off leases |
157 | 239 | ||||||
Gains on other repossessed assets |
27 | 81 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total gains on leasing related assets |
$184 | $463 | ||||||
|
|
22
Other Real Estate and Other Repossessed Assets
At March 31, 2012, the Company had other repossessed assets and other real estate owned of $125,000 and $1.2 million, respectively. At December 31, 2011, the Company had other repossessed assets and other real estate owned of $236,000 and $946,000, respectively.
Note 8. Employee Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic pension cost for the Newton Trust Companys defined benefit pension plan are as follows:
For the three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Interest cost |
$22 | $24 | ||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(19 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss |
18 | 12 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net periodic benefit expense |
$21 | $14 | ||||||
|
|
Note 9. Directors Retirement Plan
The components of net periodic plan costs for the directors retirement plan are as follows:
For the three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Service cost |
$8 | $6 | ||||||
Interest cost |
10 | 12 | ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
3 | 4 | ||||||
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss |
3 | 2 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net periodic benefit expense |
$24 | $24 | ||||||
|
|
The Company made contributions of $88,000 and $63,000 to the plan during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company does not expect to make any more contributions for the remainder of 2012.
Note 10. Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement
Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for an asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels giving the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest level priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The following describes the three levels of fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; includes U.S. Treasury Notes, and other U.S. Government Agency securities that actively trade in over-the-counter markets; equity securities and mutual funds that actively trade in over-the-counter markets.
23
Level 2 quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability including yield curves, volatilities, and prepayment speeds.
Level 3 unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that reflect the Companys own assumptions about assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and that are consequently not based on market activity but upon particular valuation techniques.
The Companys assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are its available for sale investment securities. The Company obtains fair values on its securities using information from a third party servicer. If quoted prices for securities are available in an active market, those securities are classified as Level 1 securities. The Company has certain equity securities that are classified as Level 1 securities. Level 2 securities were primarily comprised of U.S. Agency bonds, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of state and political subdivisions and corporate securities. Fair values were estimated primarily by obtaining quoted prices for similar assets in active markets or through the use of pricing models supported with market data information. Standard inputs include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, bids and offers. On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the pricing information received from the Companys third party pricing service. This review includes a comparison to non-binding third-party quotes. As a result of our review, we did not have any adjustments to prices from our third party servicer.
The following table sets forth the Companys financial assets that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of the periods presented by level within the fair value hierarchy. The Company had no liabilities accounted for at fair value as of March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company did not make any transfers between recurring Level 1 fair value measurements and recurring Level 2 fair value measurements. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
March 31, 2012 | Quoted Prices in (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant (Level 3) |
Total Fair Value |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Assets: |
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Investment securities, available for sale |
||||||||||||||||
US government agencies |
$--- | $38,170 | $--- | $38,170 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
--- | 340,107 | --- | 340,107 | ||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
--- | 35,851 | --- | 35,851 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
--- | 16,776 | --- | 16,776 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
1,968 | 13,241 | --- | 15,209 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total securities available for sale |
$1,968 | $444,145 | $--- | $446,113 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Investment securities, available for sale |
||||||||||||||||
US government agencies |
$--- | $43,603 | $--- | $43,603 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
--- | 349,524 | --- | 349,524 | ||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
--- | 35,968 | --- | 35,968 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
--- | 19,717 | --- | 19,717 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
1,732 | 13,067 | --- | 14,799 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total securities available for sale |
$1,732 | $461,879 | $--- | $463,611 |
The following table sets forth the Companys assets subject to fair value adjustments (impairment) on a nonrecurring basis. Assets are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
24
March 31, 2012 | Quoted Prices in (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant (Level 3) |
Total Fair Value |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Assets: |
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Impaired Loans and Leases |
$--- | $--- | $38,530 | $38,530 | ||||||||||||
Other real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
--- | --- | 1,314 | 1,314 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Impaired Loans and Leases |
--- | --- | $43,145 | $43,145 | ||||||||||||
Other real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
--- | --- | 1,182 | 1,182 |
Impaired loans and leases are evaluated and valued at the time the loan is identified as impaired at the lower of cost or market value. Because most of Lakelands impaired loans are collateral dependant, fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing these loans and leases and is classified at a level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Collateral may be real estate, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and/or other business assets. The value of the real estate is assessed based on appraisals by qualified third party licensed appraisers. The appraisers may use the income approach to value the collateral using discount rates (with ranges of 5-11%) or capitalization rates (with ranges of 5-9%) to evaluate the property. The value of the equipment may be determined by an appraiser, if significant, inquiry through a recognized valuation resource, or by the value on the borrowers financial statements. Field examiner reviews on business assets may be conducted based on the loan exposure and reliance on this type of collateral. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on managements historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, and/or managements expertise and knowledge of the client and clients business. Impaired loans and leases are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly, based on the same factors identified above.
Other real estate owned (OREO) and other repossessed assets, representing property acquired through foreclosure, are carried at fair value less estimated disposal costs of the acquired property. Fair value on other real estate owned is based on appraised value of the collateral using discount rates or capitalization rates similar to those used in impaired loan valuation. The fair value of other repossessed assets is estimated by inquiry through a recognized valuation resource.
Changes in the assumptions or methodologies used to estimate fair values may materially affect the estimated amounts. Changes in economic conditions, locally or nationally, could impact the value of the estimated amounts of impaired loans, OREO and other repossessed assets.
Fair Value of Certain Financial Instruments
Estimated fair values have been determined by the Company using the best available data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments. Management is concerned that there may not be reasonable comparability between institutions due to the wide range of permitted assumptions and methodologies in the absence of active markets. This lack of uniformity gives rise to a high degree of subjectivity in estimating financial instrument fair values.
The estimation methodologies used, the estimated fair values, and recorded book balances at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are outlined below.
This summary, as well as the table below, excludes financial assets and liabilities for which carrying value approximates fair value. For financial assets, these include cash and cash equivalents. For financial liabilities, these include noninterest bearing demand deposits, savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts and federal funds sold and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The estimated fair value of demand, savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. Carrying value is used because there is no stated maturity on these accounts, and the customer has the ability to withdraw the funds immediately. Also excluded from this summary and the following table are those financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, as previously described.
The fair value of Investment Securities Held to Maturity was measured using information from the same third-party
25
servicer used for Investment Securities Available for Sale using the same methodologies discussed above.
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB) stock is an equity interest that can be sold to the issuing FHLB, to other FHLBs, or to other member banks at its par value. Because ownership of these securities is restricted, they do not have a readily determinable fair value. As such, the Companys other investments are recorded at cost or par value and are evaluated for impairment each reporting period by considering the ultimate recoverability of the investment rather than temporary declines in value. The Companys evaluation primarily includes an evaluation of liquidity, capitalization, operating performance, commitments, and regulatory or legislative events.
The net loan portfolio at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 has been valued using a present value discounted cash flow where market prices were not available. The discount rate used in these calculations is the estimated current market rate adjusted for credit risk. The carrying value of accrued interest approximates fair value.
For fixed maturity certificates of deposit, fair value was estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
The fair value of long-term debt is based upon the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The Company estimates the discount rate using the rates currently offered for similar borrowing arrangements. The fair value of subordinated debentures at March 31, 2012 is based on bid/ask prices from brokers for similar types of instruments based on updated accounting guidance on fair value measurement. As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of the subordinated debentures was based on discounted cash flows using discount rates currently offered for similar borrowing arrangements.
The fair values of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of guarantees and letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.
The following table presents the carrying values, fair values and placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Companys financial instruments as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
26
March 31, 2012 | Carrying Value |
Fair Value |
Quoted Prices in (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant (Level 3) |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Instruments - Assets |
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities held to maturity |
$69,231 | $71,601 | $--- | $71,601 | $--- | |||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
$7,417 | $7,417 | --- | 7,417 | --- | |||||||||||||||
Loans and leases |
2,073,466 | 2,075,409 | --- | --- | 2,075,409 | |||||||||||||||
Financial Instruments - Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of Deposit |
338,728 | 341,173 | --- | 341,173 | --- | |||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
135,000 | 144,240 | --- | 144,240 | --- | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
77,322 | 77,990 | --- | --- | 42,939 | |||||||||||||||
Commitments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
--- | 28 | --- | --- | 28 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities held to maturity |
$71,700 | $74,274 | $--- | $74,274 | $--- | |||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
$8,333 | $8,333 | --- | 8,333 | --- | |||||||||||||||
Loans and leases |
2,041,575 | 2,055,448 | --- | --- | 2,055,448 | |||||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of Deposit |
359,552 | 362,408 | --- | 362,408 | --- | |||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
155,000 | 165,821 | --- | 165,821 | --- | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
77,322 | 77,973 | --- | --- | 77,973 | |||||||||||||||
Commitments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
--- | 71 | --- | --- | 71 |
Note 11. Preferred Stock
On February 8, 2012, the Company redeemed its remaining 19,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A originally issued to the U.S. Department of the Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program (CPP). The Company paid to the Treasury $19.2 million, which included $19.0 million of principal and $219,000 in accrued and unpaid dividends, on February 8, 2012. As a result of the early payment, the Company also accelerated the accretion of $501,000 of the preferred stock discount.
On February 29, 2012, the Company repurchased the outstanding common stock warrant previously issued to the treasury for the purchase of 1,046,901 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $8.46 per share, for $2.8 million., completing the Companys participation in the Treasurys CPP. Upon repurchase, the common stock warrant had a carrying value of $3.3 million. The repurchase price of $2.8 million was recorded as a reduction to common stock on the statement of changes in stockholders equity.
Note 12. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued new accounting guidance regarding the reconsideration of effective control for repurchase agreements. This guidance modifies the criteria for determining when repurchase agreements would be accounted for as a secured borrowing rather than as a sale. Currently, an entity that maintains effective control over transferred financial assets must account for the transfer as a secured borrowing rather than as a sale. This guidance removes from the assessment of effective control the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee. The FASB
27
believes that contractual rights and obligations determine effective control and that there does not need to be a requirement to assess the ability to exercise those rights. This guidance does not change the other existing criteria used in the assessment of effective control. The Company adopted the provisions of this guidance prospectively for transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occurred on or after January 1, 2012. As the Company accounted for all of its repurchase agreements as collateralized financing arrangements prior to the adoption of this guidance, the adoption had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (the IASB) issued new accounting guidance on fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. This guidance is the result of work by the FASB and IASB to develop common requirements for measuring fair value and disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). As a result, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The guidance is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2012. Adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance updating the requirements regarding the presentation of comprehensive income to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Under the new guidance, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income can be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the changes in stockholders equity. This amendment will be applied prospectively and the amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. In December 2011, the FASB deferred certain aspects of this guidance related to the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income separately with their respective components of net income and other comprehensive income. The Company adopted this guidance during the first quarter of 2012. Adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements, but resulted in additional disclosure.
In September 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance related to the annual testing of goodwill for impairment. Under the new guidance, an entity has the option to first determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. If, however, the entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test and then perform the second test, if required. This amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance for its goodwill review as of November 30, 2011. Adoption did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This section should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Statements Regarding Forward Looking Information
The information disclosed in this document includes various forward-looking statements that are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to credit quality (including delinquency trends and the allowance for loan and lease losses), corporate objectives, and other financial and business matters. The words anticipates, projects, intends, estimates, expects, believes, plans, may, will, should, could, and other similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. The Company cautions that these forward-looking statements are necessarily speculative and speak only as of the date made, and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, all of which may change over time. Actual results could differ materially from such forward-looking statements.
In addition to the risk factors disclosed elsewhere in this document, the following factors, among others, could cause the Companys actual results to differ materially and adversely from such forward-looking statements: changes in the financial
28
services industry and the U.S. and global capital markets, changes in economic conditions nationally, regionally and in the Companys markets, the nature and timing of actions of the Federal Reserve Board and other regulators, the nature and timing of legislation affecting the financial services industry including, but not limited to, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, government intervention in the U.S. financial system, changes in levels of market interest rates, pricing pressures on loan and deposit products, credit risks of the Companys lending and leasing activities, customers acceptance of the Companys products and services and competition.
The above-listed risk factors are not necessarily exhaustive, particularly as to possible future events, and new risk factors may emerge from time to time. Certain events may occur that could cause the Companys actual results to be materially different than those described in the Companys periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any statements made by the Company that are not historical facts should be considered to be forward-looking statements. The Company is not obligated to update and does not undertake to update any of its forward-looking statements made herein.
Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiaries conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and predominant practices within the banking industry. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, Lakeland, Lakeland NJ Investment Corp., Lakeland Investment Corp., Lakeland Equity, Inc., and Lakeland Preferred Equity, Inc. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions also affect reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. There have been no material changes in the Companys critical accounting policies, judgments and estimates, including assumptions or estimation techniques utilized, as compared to those disclosed in the Companys most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Results of Operations
(First Quarter 2012 Compared to First Quarter 2011)
Net Income
Net income for the first quarter of 2012 was $5.0 million, compared to net income of $4.8 million for the same period in 2011. Net income available to common shareholders was $4.4 million compared to net income of $3.5 million for the same period last year. Diluted earnings per share was $0.16 for the first quarter of 2012, compared to diluted earnings per share of $0.13 for the same period last year. Dividends on preferred stock and accretion decreased to $620,000 from $1.3 million for the same period last year. The lower dividends and accretion reflect repayments to the U.S. Department of the Treasury to repurchase preferred stock under the CPP. During the first quarter of 2012 the Company repaid the remaining $19.0 million in preferred stock to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, resulting in a non cash charge of $501,000, reflecting the acceleration of the preferred stock discount accretion. During the first quarter of 2011 the Company incurred a similar charge of $745,000, as $20.0 million in repayments to repurchase preferred stock were made during that period. The Company also repurchased the outstanding common stock warrant previously issued to the treasury for the purchase of 1,046,901 shares of its common stock, for $2.8 million, completing the Companys participation in the Treasurys CPP.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the difference between interest income on earning assets and the cost of funds supporting those assets. The Companys net interest income is determined by: (i) the volume of interest-earning assets that it holds and the yields that it earns on those assets, and (ii) the volume of interest-bearing liabilities that it has assumed and the rates that it pays on those liabilities. Net interest income increases when the Company can use noninterest- bearing deposits to fund or support interest-earning assets. The Companys net interest income is influenced by the current low interest rate environment. For information on how interest rate change can influence the Companys net interest income, and how the Company manages it net interest income, please see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in Item 3 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Companys net interest margin can also be impacted by its level of non-performing loans. If non-peforming loans decline, this could increase the net interest margin.
29
Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the first quarter of 2012 was $24.2 million, compared to $24.9 million earned in the first quarter of 2011. The net interest margin decreased from 3.91% in the first quarter of 2011 to 3.76% in the first quarter of 2012, primarily as a result of a 31 basis point decline in the yield on interest-earning assets, which was partially offset by a 17 basis point reduction in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin would have been 3.86% and 3.99% for the first quarter of 2012 and 2011, respectively, had the Companys non-performing loans performed in accordance with their terms. The net interest spread as a result declined 13 basis points to 3.60%. Although the net interest spread declined, the decline was mitigated by an increase in income earned on free funds (interest earning assets funded by non-interest bearing liabilities) resulting from an increase in average non-interest bearing deposits of $48.0 million. Also mitigating the decline in the net interest margin was a change in mix in interest bearing deposits from time deposits to lower interest-bearing transaction accounts. The components of net interest income will be discussed in greater detail below.
The following table reflects the components of the Companys net interest income, setting forth for the periods presented, (1) average assets, liabilities and stockholders equity, (2) interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities, (3) average yields earned on interest-earning assets and average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, (4) the Companys net interest spread (i.e., the average yield on interest-earning assets less the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities) and (5) the Companys net interest margin. Rates are computed on a tax equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35%.
For the three months ended, | For the three months ended, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 | March 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Average Balance |
|
|
Interest Income/ Expense |
|
|
Average rates earned/ paid |
|
|
Average Balance |
|
|
Interest Income/ Expense |
|
|
Average rates earned/ paid |
| |||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
(dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans and leases (A) |
$ | 2,050,093 | $ | 25,458 | 4.99% | $ | 2,000,057 | $ | 26,665 | 5.41% | ||||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities and other |
447,252 | 2,340 | 2.09% | 476,688 | 2,713 | 2.28% | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt securities |
72,787 | 754 | 4.14% | 67,594 | 768 | 4.54% | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold (B) |
22,522 | 6 | 0.11% | 32,896 | 12 | 0.15% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
2,592,654 | 28,558 | 4.43% | 2,577,235 | 30,158 | 4.74% | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
(29,162 | ) | (28,874 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
242,705 | 249,178 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 2,806,197 | $ | 2,797,539 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings accounts |
$ | 338,221 | $ | 90 | 0.11% | $ | 322,225 | $ | 127 | 0.16% | ||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
1,137,069 | 1,272 | 0.45% | 1,093,625 | 1,505 | 0.56% | ||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
350,937 | 894 | 1.02% | 413,481 | 1,299 | 1.26% | ||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
267,165 | 2,092 | 3.13% | 294,106 | 2,374 | 3.23% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
2,093,392 | 4,348 | 0.83% | 2,123,437 | 5,305 | 1.00% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
448,893 | 400,891 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
13,236 | 13,063 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
250,676 | 260,148 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 2,806,197 | $ | 2,797,539 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income/spread |
24,210 | 3.60% | 24,853 | 3.73% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent basis adjustment |
264 | 269 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
$ | 23,946 | $ | 24,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (C) |
3.76% | 3.91% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(A) Includes non-accrual loans, the effect of which is to reduce the yield earned on loans, and deferred loan fees.
(B) Includes interest-bearing cash accounts.
(C) Net interest income divided by interest-earning assets.
Interest income on a tax equivalent basis decreased from $30.2 million in the first quarter of 2011 to $28.6 million in the first quarter of 2012, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 5%. The decrease in interest income was due primarily to a 31 basis point decrease in the yield on interest earning assets, as a result of loans being refinanced at lower rates and lower yields on new loans and investments. The yield on average loans and leases at 4.99% in the first quarter of 2012 was 42 basis points lower than the first quarter of 2011. The yield on average taxable and tax exempt investment securities decreased by 19 basis points and 40 basis points, respectively, compared to the first quarter of 2011. Average loans and leases at $2.05 billion increased $50.0 million from the first quarter of 2011, while average investment securities at $520.0 million decreased $24.2 million.
30
Total interest expense decreased from $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2011 to $4.3 million in the first quarter of 2012, a decrease of $957,000, or 18%. The cost of average interest-bearing liabilities decreased from 1.00% in the first quarter of 2011 to 0.83% in 2012. The decrease in yield was due to the continuing low rate environment along with a $62.5 million reduction in higher yielding time deposits as customers preferred to keep their deposits in short-term transaction accounts. Average savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts increased by $16.0 million and $43.4 million, respectively, from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012. Average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities declined in all categories.
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
In determining the provision for loan and lease losses, management considers national and local economic conditions; trends in the portfolio including orientation to specific loan types or industries; experience, ability and depth of lending management in relation to the complexity of the portfolio; adequacy and adherence to policies, procedures and practices; levels and trends in delinquencies, impaired loans; net charge-offs, and the results of independent third party loan and lease review.
In the first quarter of 2012, a $4.6 million provision for loan and lease losses was recorded, which was $371,000 lower than the provision for the same period last year. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company charged off loans and leases of $5.0 million and recovered $735,000 in previously charged off loans and leases compared to $5.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively, during the same period in 2011. For more information regarding the determination of the provision, see Risk Elements below.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income decreased $173,000, or 4%, to $4.1 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011. The decrease in noninterest income was due primarily to a decline in gains on leasing related assets from $463,000 in the first quarter of 2011 to $184,000 in the first quarter of 2012 as a result of the decline in the leasing portfolio. Income on bank owned life insurance at $339,000 decreased $16,000 from the first quarter 2011 due to a decline in rates for the underlying policies. Commissions and fees totaled $980,000 in the first quarter of 2012 and were $148,000 or 18% higher than the same period last year due primarily to increases in investment commission income.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense totaling $16.3 million decreased $751,000 in the first quarter of 2012 from the first quarter of 2011. Net occupancy expense at $1.7 million decreased $223,000 compared to the first quarter of 2011 due primarily to decreased snow removal costs resulting from the mild winter. Furniture and equipment expense at $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2012 decreased $81,000 from the same period last year due primarily to a reduction in equipment service contract expense. Stationery, supplies and postage at $336,000 in the first quarter decreased $29,000 primarily as a result of a reduction in postage expense due to the implementation of electronic statement delivery. Marketing expense totaling $470,000 decreased $145,000, compared to the first quarter of 2011 due primarily to the timing of media expenses. During the third quarter of 2011 the Company completed its core deposit intangible amortization, which resulted in a $265,000 decrease in that category in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. FDIC insurance expense at $555,000 decreased $392,000 compared to the first quarter of 2011 as a result of changes made by the FDIC in the method of calculating assessment rates. Salaries and employee benefits at $9.4 million increased $449,000 or 5% compared to the first quarter of 2011. Collection expense at $139,000 and legal expense at $399,000 increased $74,000 and $104,000, respectively, while other real estate and repossessed asset expense at $38,000 decreased $234,000. The Companys efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure, was 57.7% in the first quarter of 2012, compared to 56.7% for the same period last year as a result of a decline in revenue, offset by continued management of expenses. The Company uses this ratio because it believes that the ratio provides a good comparison of period-to-period performance and because the ratio is widely accepted in the banking industry. The following table shows the calculation of the efficiency ratio for the periods presented:
31
For the three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|
||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Calculation of efficiency ratio |
||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
$16,275 | $17,026 | ||||||
Less: |
||||||||
Amortization of core deposit intangibles |
- | (265 | ) | |||||
Other real estate owned and other repossessed asset expense |
(38 | ) | (272 | ) | ||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments |
56 | 4 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Noninterest expense, as adjusted |
$16,293 | $16,493 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Net interest income |
$23,946 | $24,584 | ||||||
Noninterest income |
4,057 | 4,230 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total revenue |
28,003 | 28,814 | ||||||
Plus: Tax-equivalent adjustment on municipal securities |
264 | 269 | ||||||
Less: gains on investment securities |
(32 | ) | - | |||||
|
||||||||
Total revenue, as adjusted |
$28,235 | $29,083 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Efficiency ratio |
57.71 | % | 56.71 | % | ||||
|
Financial Condition
The Companys total assets increased $26.4 million from $2.83 billion at December 31, 2011, to $2.85 billion at March 31, 2012 due primarily to a $32.2 million increase in total loans. Total deposits increased $38.5 million, with non-interest bearing transaction accounts increasing $26.8 million.
Loans and Leases
Gross loans and leases at $2.07 billion increased by $32.2 million from December 31, 2011. The increase in gross loans and leases is primarily due to commercial loans secured by real estate at $1.04 billion and commercial, industrial and other loans at $219.3 million increasing $29.6 million and $9.4 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a $7.7 million decrease in real estate construction loans. For more information on the loan portfolio, see Note 7 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Risk Elements
Non-performing assets decreased from $50.2 million, or 1.78% of total assets, on December 31, 2011 to $43.3 million, or 1.52% of total assets, on March 31, 2012. The majority of the decrease was in commercial loans secured by real estate, which decreased $4.0 million from December 31, 2011. Residential mortgages and construction real estate decreased $1.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively, and were partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in commercial, industrial and other loans. Commercial loan non-accruals at March 31, 2012 included eight loan relationships with balances over $1.0 million, totaling $18.4 million, and five loan relationships between $500,000 and $1.0 million, totaling $3.6 million.
Loans and leases past due ninety days or more and still accruing at March 31, 2012 increased $976,000 to $2.3 million from December 31, 2011. Loans and leases past due 90 days or more and still accruing are those loans and leases that are considered both well-secured and in process of collection.
On March 31, 2012, the Company had $8.7 million in loans that were troubled debt restructurings and still accruing interest income compared to $8.9 million on December 31, 2011. Troubled debt restructurings are those loans where the Company has granted concessions to the borrower in payment terms, either in rate or in term, as a result of the financial condition of the borrower.
On March 31, 2012, the Company had $38.5 million in impaired loans and leases (consisting primarily of non-accrual
32
and restructured loans and leases) compared to $43.1 million at year-end 2011. Impaired loans decreased from year-end 2011 primarily as a result of the decrease in non-accrual commercial loans secured by real estate. For more information on these loans and leases see Note 7 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The impairment of the loans and leases is measured using the present value of future cash flows on certain impaired loans and leases and is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral for the remaining loans and leases. Based on such evaluation, $818,000 has been allocated as a portion of the allowance for loan and lease losses for impairment at March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2012, the Company also had $44.1 million in loans and leases that were rated substandard that were not classified as non-performing or impaired compared to $41.7 million at December 31, 2011.
There were no loans and leases at March 31, 2012, other than those designated non-performing, impaired or substandard, where the Company was aware of any credit conditions of any borrowers or obligors that would indicate a strong possibility of the borrowers not complying with present terms and conditions of repayment and which may result in such loans and leases being included as non-accrual, past due or renegotiated at a future date. The following table sets forth for the periods presented, the historical relationships among the allowance for loan and lease losses, the provision for loan and lease losses, the amount of loans and leases charged-off and the amount of loan and lease recoveries:
(dollars in thousands) | Three months ended March 31, 2012 |
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
Year ended |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance of the allowance at the beginning of the year |
$28,416 | $27,331 | $27,331 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Loans and leases charged off: |
||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
2,090 | 523 | 5,352 | |||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
149 | 698 | 5,249 | |||||||||
Leases |
168 | 1,090 | 2,858 | |||||||||
Real estate--mortgage |
357 | 295 | 1,772 | |||||||||
Real estate-construction |
1,526 | 2,436 | 3,636 | |||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
717 | 633 | 3,010 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total loans charged off |
5,007 | 5,675 | 21,877 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate |
39 | 958 | 2,084 | |||||||||
Commercial, industrial and other |
179 | 100 | 439 | |||||||||
Leases |
378 | 503 | 1,206 | |||||||||
Real estate--mortgage |
12 | 1 | 32 | |||||||||
Real estate-construction |
27 | --- | 67 | |||||||||
Home equity and consumer |
100 | 47 | 318 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Recoveries |
735 | 1,609 | 4,146 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Net charge-offs: |
4,272 | 4,066 | 17,731 | |||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
4,556 | 4,927 | 18,816 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Ending balance |
$28,700 | $28,192 | $28,416 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Ratio of annualized net charge-offs to average loans and leases outstanding |
0.83 | % | 0.81 | % | 0.89 | % | ||||||
Ratio of allowance at end of period as a percentage of period end total loans and leases |
1.38 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.39 | % |
The ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses to loans and leases outstanding reflects managements evaluation of the underlying credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio. The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses and periodic provisioning for estimated losses included in the consolidated financial statements is the responsibility of management and the Board of Directors. The evaluation process is undertaken on a quarterly basis.
Methodology employed for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses consists of the following criteria:
| The establishment of reserve amounts for all specifically identified classified loans and leases that have been designated |
33
as requiring attention by the Company or its external loan review consultants. |
| The establishment of reserves for pools of homogeneous types of loans and leases not subject to specific review, including impaired commercial loans under $250,000, leases, 1 4 family residential mortgages and consumer loans. |
| The establishment of reserve amounts for the non-classified loans and leases in each portfolio based upon the historical average loss experience of these portfolios and managements evaluation of key factors described below. |
Consideration is given to the results of ongoing credit quality monitoring processes, the adequacy and expertise of the Companys lending staff, underwriting policies, loss histories, delinquency trends, and the cyclical nature of economic and business conditions. Since many of the Companys loans depend on the sufficiency of collateral as a secondary means of repayment, any adverse trend in the real estate markets could affect underlying values available to protect the Company against loss.
Non-performing loans and leases decreased from $49.0 million on December 31, 2011 to $42.0 million on March 31, 2012. The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percent of total loans was 1.38% at March 31, 2012, compared to 1.39% as of December 31, 2011. Management believes, based on appraisals and estimated selling costs, that its non-performing loans and leases are adequately secured and reserves on these loans are adequate. The preceding statement constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Based upon the process employed and giving recognition to all accompanying factors related to the loan and lease portfolio, management considers the allowance for loan and lease losses to be adequate at March 31, 2012. The preceding statement constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Investment Securities
For detailed information on the composition and maturity distribution of the Companys investment securities portfolio, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-Q. Total investment securities decreased from $535.3 million on December 31, 2011 to $515.3 million on March 31, 2012, a decrease of $20.0 million, or 4%.
Deposits
Total deposits increased from $2.25 billion on December 31, 2011 to $2.29 billion on March 31, 2012, an increase of $38.5 million, or 2%. Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts totaling $1.47 billion increased $32.5 million from December 31, 2011, while time deposits totaling $338.7 million decreased $20.8 million. Noninterest bearing deposits increased $26.8 million, or 6%, to $476.3 million, resulting primarily from an increase in commercial noninterest bearing deposits.
Liquidity
Liquidity relates to the Companys ability to meet the borrowing and cash withdrawal requirements of its customers, to meet current and planned expenditures and to satisfy its debt obligations. Lakeland funds its liquidity needs through its net income, through generating deposits, through sales of its available for sale securities, through loan and investment repayments, and through use of overnight credit lines. Lakeland can also generate funds by utilizing long-term debt or securities sold through agreements to repurchase that would be collateralized by security or mortgage collateral. Management and the Board monitor the Companys liquidity through the Asset Liability Management Committee (the ALCO) which monitors the Companys compliance to certain regulatory ratios and various other liquidity guidelines.
The cash flow statements for the periods presented provide an indication of the Companys sources and uses of cash, as well as an indication of the ability of the Company to maintain an adequate level of liquidity. A discussion of the cash flow statement for the three months ended March 31, 2012 follows.
Cash and cash equivalents totaling $86.8 million on March 31, 2012, increased $14.3 million from December 31, 2011. Operating activities provided $13.6 million in net cash. Investing activities used $18.9 million in net cash, primarily reflecting an increase in loans and leases. Financing activities provided $19.6 million in net cash, reflecting a net increase of $38.5 million in deposits and a $24.3 million increase in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, partially offset by net repayments of $20.0 million in other borrowings and the redemption of $19.0 million in preferred stock. The Company anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet its current loan commitments and deposit maturities. This constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The following table sets forth contractual obligations and other commitments representing required and potential cash
34
outflows as of March 31, 2012. Interest on subordinated debentures and long-term borrowed funds is calculated based on current contractual interest rates.
(dollars in thousands) | Total | Within one year |
After one but years |
After three but within five years |
After five years |
|||||||||||||||
Minimum annual rentals or noncancellable operating leases |
$20,016 | $2,260 | $4,022 | $3,183 | $10,551 | |||||||||||||||
Benefit plan commitments |
4,870 | 185 | 335 | 300 | 4,050 | |||||||||||||||
Remaining contractual maturities of time deposits |
338,728 | 243,235 | 79,545 | 15,086 | 862 | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
77,322 | --- | --- | --- | 77,322 | |||||||||||||||
Loan commitments |
428,905 | 345,532 | 57,348 | 432 | 25,593 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
135,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 10,000 | 45,000 | |||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt* |
113,553 | 7,981 | 15,585 | 12,700 | 77,287 | |||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
15,528 | 7,245 | 8,048 | 155 | 80 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$1,133,922 | $646,438 | $204,883 | $41,856 | $240,745 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
*Includes interest on long-term debt and subordinated debentures at a weighted rate of 3.83%.
Capital Resources
Total stockholders equity decreased from $259.8 million on December 31, 2011 to $242.0 million on March 31, 2012, a decrease of $17.8 million, or 7%. Book value per common share decreased to $8.97 on March 31, 2012 from $8.99 on December 31, 2011. The decrease in stockholders equity from December 31, 2011 to March 31, 2012 was primarily due to the $19.0 million redemption of preferred stock, the warrant repurchase totaling $2.8 million and payment of dividends on common and preferred stock of $1.5 million, partially offset by $5.0 million in net income.
The Company and Lakeland are subject to various regulatory capital requirements that are monitored by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can lead to certain supervisory actions by regulators; any supervisory action could have a direct material adverse effect on the Company or Lakelands financial statements. Management believes, as of March 31, 2012, that the Company and Lakeland meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
The capital ratios for the Company and Lakeland at March 31, 2012 are as follows:
Capital Ratios: | Tier 1 Capital to Total Average Assets Ratio March 31, 2012 |
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio March 31, 2012 |
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio March 31, 2012 | |||
The Company |
7.46% | 9.92% | 12.37% | |||
Lakeland Bank |
7.83% | 10.41% | 11.66% | |||
Well capitalized institution under FDIC Regulations |
5.00% | 6.00% | 10.00% |
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Reported amounts are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Companys management believes that the supplemental non-GAAP information, which consists of measurements and ratios based on tangible equity and tangible assets, is utilized by regulators and market analysts to evaluate a companys financial condition and therefore, such information is useful to investors. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for financial results determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures which may be presented by other companies.
35
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Calculation of tangible book value per common share |
||||||||
Total common stockholders equity at end of period-GAAP |
$241,955 | $241,303 | ||||||
Less: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
87,111 | 87,111 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total tangible common stockholders equity at end of period---Non- GAAP |
$154,844 | $154,192 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Shares outstanding at end of period (1) |
26,963 | 26,836 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Book value per share-GAAP (1) |
$8.97 | $8.99 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Tangible book value per share---Non-GAAP (1) |
$5.74 | $5.75 | ||||||
|
||||||||
(1) Adjusted for 5% stock dividend granted April 16, 2012 to shareholders of record March 30, 2012. |
||||||||
Calculation of tangible common equity to tangible assets |
||||||||
Total tangible common stockholders equity at end of period---Non- GAAP |
$154,844 | $154,192 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total assets at end of period |
$2,852,347 | $2,825,950 | ||||||
Less: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
87,111 | 87,111 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total tangible assets at end of period---Non-GAAP |
$2,765,236 | $2,738,839 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Common equity to assets-GAAP |
8.48% | 8.54% | ||||||
|
||||||||
Tangible common equity to tangible assets-Non-GAAP |
5.60% | 5.63% | ||||||
|
For the three months ended, | ||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Calculation of return on average tangible common equity |
||||||||
Net income-GAAP |
$4,971 | $4,771 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total average common stockholders equity |
$242,957 | $226,051 | ||||||
Less: |
||||||||
Average goodwill |
87,111 | 87,111 | ||||||
Average other identifiable intangible assets, net |
--- | 460 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total average tangible common stockholders equity-Non-GAAP |
$155,846 | $138,480 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Return on average common stockholders equity-GAAP |
8.23% | 8.56% | ||||||
|
||||||||
Return on average tangible common stockholders equity-Non-GAAP |
12.83% | 13.97% | ||||||
|
36
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company manages interest rate risk and market risk by identifying and quantifying interest rate risk exposures using simulation analysis and economic value at risk models. Net interest income simulation considers the relative sensitivities of the balance sheet including the effects of interest rate caps on adjustable rate mortgages and the relatively stable aspects of core deposits. As such, net interest income simulation is designed to address the probability of interest rate changes and the behavioral response of the balance sheet to those changes. Market Value of Portfolio Equity represents the fair value of the net present value of assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet items. Changes in estimates and assumptions made for interest rate sensitivity modeling could have a significant impact on projected results and conclusions. These assumptions could include prepayment rates, sensitivity of non-maturity deposits and other similar assumptions. Therefore, if our assumptions should change, this technique may not accurately reflect the impact of general interest rate movements on the Companys net interest income or net portfolio value.
The starting point (or base case) for the following table is an estimate of the following years net interest income assuming that both interest rates and the Companys interest-sensitive assets and liabilities remain at period-end levels. The net interest income estimated for the next twelve months (the base case) is $97.8 million. The information provided for net interest income assumes that changes in interest rates of plus 200 basis points and minus 200 basis points change gradually in equal increments (rate ramp) over the twelve month period.
Changes in interest rates | ||||||||||||||||
Rate Ramp | +200 bp | +100 bp | -100 bp | -200 bp | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Asset/Liability Policy Limit |
-5.0% | -5.0% | ||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 |
-3.9% | -1.8% | -2.0% | -2.8% | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
-4.0% | -1.6% | -2.2% | -2.8% |
The base case for the following table is an estimate of the Companys net portfolio value for the periods presented using current discount rates, and assuming the Companys interest-sensitive assets and liabilities remain at period-end levels. The net portfolio value at March 31, 2012 (the base case) was $309.6 million. The information provided for the net portfolio value assumes fluctuations or rate shocks of plus 200 basis points and minus 200 basis points for changes in interest rates as shown in the table below. Rate shocks assume that current interest rates change immediately.
Changes in interest rates | ||||||||||||||||
Rate Shock | +200 bp | +100 bp | -100 bp | -200 bp | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Asset/Liability Policy Limit |
-25.0% | -25.0% | ||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 |
-9.6% | -1.6% | -4.9% | -11.2% | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
-7.2% | -0.7% | -6.4% | -12.9% |
The information set forth in the above tables is based on significant estimates and assumptions, and constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. For more information regarding the Companys market risk and assumptions used in the Companys simulation models, please refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the Companys most recently completed fiscal quarter covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and are
37
operating in an effective manner and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
38
There are no pending legal proceedings involving the Company or Lakeland other than those arising in the normal course of business. Management does not anticipate that the potential liability, if any, arising out of such legal proceedings will have a material effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company and Lakeland on a consolidated basis.
There have been no material changes in risk factors from those disclosed under Item 1A, Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
31.1 | Certification by Thomas J. Shara pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. | |
31.2 | Certification by Joseph F. Hurley pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. | |
32.1 | Certification by Thomas J. Shara and Joseph F. Hurley pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. | |
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
| |
* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
39
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. |
||||
(Registrant) |
/s/ Thomas J. Shara |
||||
Thomas J. Shara |
||||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
/s/ Joseph F. Hurley |
||||
Joseph F. Hurley |
||||
Executive Vice President and |
||||
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: May 10, 2012
40