e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-34046
WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
26-1075808
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1201 Lake Robbins Drive
The Woodlands, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
77380
(Zip Code) |
(832) 636-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were 29,474,925 common units outstanding as of October 31, 2009.
Definitions
As generally used within the energy industry and in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the
identified terms have the following meanings:
Barrel or Bbl: 42 U.S. gallons measured at 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
Bcf/d: One billion cubic feet per day.
Btu: British thermal unit.
CO2: Carbon dioxide.
Condensate: A natural gas liquid with a low vapor pressure mainly composed of propane, butane,
pentane and heavier hydrocarbon fractions.
Drip condensate: Heavier hydrocarbon liquids that fall out of the natural gas stream and are
recovered in the gathering system without processing.
Imbalance: Imbalances result from (i) differences between gas volumes nominated by customers and
gas volumes received from those customers and (ii) differences between gas volumes received from
customers and gas volumes delivered to those customers.
Long ton: A British unit of weight equivalent to 2,240 pounds.
LTD: One long ton per day.
MMBtu: One million British thermal units.
MMBtu/d: One million British thermal units per day.
MMcf/d: One million cubic feet per day.
Natural gas: Hydrocarbon gas found in the earth composed of methane, ethane, butane, propane and
other gases.
Natural gas liquids or NGLs: The combination of ethane, propane, butane and natural gasolines that
when removed from natural gas become liquid under various levels of higher pressure and lower
temperature.
Residue gas: The natural gas remaining after being processed or treated.
Sour gas: Natural gas containing more than four parts per million of hydrogen sulfide.
Tcf: One trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
Wellhead: The equipment at the surface of a well used to control the wells pressure; the point at
which the hydrocarbons and water exit the ground.
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
Western Gas Partners, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per-unit amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
2009(1) |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
Revenues affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas |
|
$ |
33,438 |
|
|
$ |
29,878 |
|
|
$ |
101,314 |
|
|
$ |
88,217 |
|
Natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales |
|
|
19,026 |
|
|
|
50,247 |
|
|
|
55,963 |
|
|
|
150,771 |
|
Equity income and other |
|
|
2,254 |
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
6,624 |
|
|
|
7,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues affiliates |
|
|
54,718 |
|
|
|
82,352 |
|
|
|
163,901 |
|
|
|
246,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues third parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas |
|
|
4,514 |
|
|
|
5,254 |
|
|
|
12,985 |
|
|
|
12,811 |
|
Natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
4,969 |
|
|
|
14,063 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
5,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues third parties |
|
|
6,278 |
|
|
|
12,230 |
|
|
|
18,760 |
|
|
|
32,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
60,996 |
|
|
|
94,582 |
|
|
|
182,661 |
|
|
|
279,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product |
|
|
12,888 |
|
|
|
40,912 |
|
|
|
37,479 |
|
|
|
124,204 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
11,741 |
|
|
|
14,001 |
|
|
|
34,841 |
|
|
|
39,512 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,980 |
|
|
|
4,332 |
|
|
|
15,067 |
|
|
|
9,564 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
5,984 |
|
|
|
5,510 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,216 |
|
|
|
9,380 |
|
|
|
29,642 |
|
|
|
26,890 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
42,701 |
|
|
|
79,609 |
|
|
|
123,013 |
|
|
|
215,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
18,295 |
|
|
|
14,973 |
|
|
|
59,648 |
|
|
|
64,046 |
|
Interest income, net affiliates |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
5,977 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
19,406 |
|
|
|
19,760 |
|
|
|
65,654 |
|
|
|
69,137 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
11,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
19,235 |
|
|
|
21,223 |
|
|
|
65,806 |
|
|
|
57,848 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
6,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
17,949 |
|
|
$ |
58,065 |
|
|
$ |
51,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partner interest in net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP (3) |
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
17,949 |
|
|
$ |
58,065 |
|
|
$ |
51,671 |
|
Less pre-acquisition income allocated to Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
5,935 |
|
|
|
26,026 |
|
Less general partner interest in net income |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partner interest in net income |
|
$ |
16,707 |
|
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
51,087 |
|
|
$ |
25,132 |
|
Net income per common unit basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
Net income per subordinated unit basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial information for 2008 and the first six months of 2009 has been revised
to include results attributable to the Powder River assets and Chipeta assets. See Note
1Description of Business and Basis of PresentationPowder River acquisition and Chipeta
acquisition. |
|
(2) |
|
Operating expenses include amounts charged by Anadarko to the Partnership
(Anadarko and Partnership are as defined in Note 1Description of Business and Basis of
Presentation) for services as well as reimbursement of amounts paid by Anadarko to third
parties on behalf of the Partnership. Cost of product expenses include product purchases from
Anadarko of $1.3 million and $7.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, and $4.8 million and $22.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Operation and maintenance expenses include charges from Anadarko
of $5.2 million and $5.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $14.6 million and $15.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. General and administrative expenses include charges from Anadarko of
$3.6 million and $3.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $10.5 million and $8.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. See Note 6Transactions with Affiliates. |
|
(3) |
|
General and limited partner interest in net income represents net income for periods
including and subsequent to the Partnerships acquisition of the Partnership Assets (as
defined in Note 1Description of Business and Basis of Presentation Presentation of
Partnership Acquisitions). See also Note 5Net Income per Limited Partner Unit. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Western Gas Partners, LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except number of units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
56,023 |
|
|
$ |
36,074 |
|
Accounts receivable, net third parties |
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
5,878 |
|
Accounts receivable affiliates |
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
Natural gas imbalance receivables third parties |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
Natural gas imbalance receivables affiliates |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
62,335 |
|
|
|
47,155 |
|
Note receivable Anadarko |
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
901,340 |
|
|
|
861,780 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
204,683 |
|
|
|
175,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
696,657 |
|
|
|
686,353 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
20,836 |
|
|
|
20,836 |
|
Equity investment |
|
|
19,651 |
|
|
|
18,183 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,059,889 |
|
|
$ |
1,033,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable third parties |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
|
$ |
5,459 |
|
Accounts payable affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,103 |
|
Natural gas imbalance payable third parties |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
Natural gas imbalance payable affiliates |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
Accrued ad valorem taxes |
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Accrued liabilities third parties |
|
|
8,040 |
|
|
|
12,802 |
|
Accrued liabilities affiliates |
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
21,538 |
|
|
|
42,435 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable Anadarko |
|
|
276,451 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
Asset retirement obligations and other |
|
|
10,568 |
|
|
|
9,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
287,624 |
|
|
|
186,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
309,162 |
|
|
|
228,530 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity and Partners capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units (29,474,925 and 29,093,197 units issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
|
|
377,032 |
|
|
|
368,049 |
|
Subordinated units (26,536,306 units issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008) |
|
|
276,019 |
|
|
|
275,917 |
|
General partner units (1,143,086 and 1,135,296 units issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
|
|
11,221 |
|
|
|
10,988 |
|
Parent net investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,655 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
86,455 |
|
|
|
66,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity and Partners capital |
|
|
750,727 |
|
|
|
804,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, equity and Partners capital |
|
$ |
1,059,889 |
|
|
$ |
1,033,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial information for 2008 has been revised to include balances attributable
to the Chipeta assets. See Note 1Description of Business and Basis of PresentationChipeta
acquisition. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
Western Gas Partners, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY AND PARTNERS CAPITAL
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Net |
|
|
Limited Partners |
|
|
General |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 (1) |
|
$ |
83,655 |
|
|
$ |
368,049 |
|
|
$ |
275,917 |
|
|
$ |
10,988 |
|
|
$ |
66,016 |
|
|
$ |
804,625 |
|
Net pre-acquisition distributions to Anadarko |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844 |
|
Contribution of Chipeta assets |
|
|
(112,744 |
) |
|
|
11,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,451 |
) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interest owners
and Parent |
|
|
25,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,509 |
|
|
|
40,745 |
|
Non-cash equity-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
Net income |
|
|
5,935 |
|
|
|
26,838 |
|
|
|
24,249 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
65,806 |
|
Distributions to unitholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,595 |
) |
|
|
(24,147 |
) |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,777 |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owners and
Parent |
|
|
(2,926 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,811 |
) |
|
|
(5,737 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
377,032 |
|
|
$ |
276,019 |
|
|
$ |
11,221 |
|
|
$ |
86,455 |
|
|
$ |
750,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial information for 2008 and the first six months of 2009 has been revised
to include balances attributable to the Chipeta assets. See Note 1Description of Business
and Basis of PresentationChipeta acquisition. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
Western Gas Partners, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009(1) |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
65,806 |
|
|
$ |
57,848 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29,642 |
|
|
|
26,890 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
2,433 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
(10,948 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in natural gas imbalance receivable |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
(1,066 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and
natural gas imbalance payable |
|
|
(17,007 |
) |
|
|
21,683 |
|
Change in other items, net |
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
79,651 |
|
|
|
104,715 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chipeta acquisition |
|
|
(101,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(41,500 |
) |
|
|
(68,930 |
) |
Loan to Anadarko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260,000 |
) |
Investment in equity affiliate |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
(8,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(143,215 |
) |
|
|
(337,025 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,161 |
|
Reimbursement to Parent from offering proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,161 |
) |
Issuance of Note Payable to Anadarko |
|
|
101,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interest owners and Parent |
|
|
40,745 |
|
|
|
148,356 |
|
Distributions to unitholders |
|
|
(51,777 |
) |
|
|
(8,567 |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owners and Parent |
|
|
(5,737 |
) |
|
|
(19,734 |
) |
Net pre-acquisition distributions from Anadarko |
|
|
(1,169 |
) |
|
|
(106,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
83,513 |
|
|
|
283,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
19,949 |
|
|
|
51,390 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
36,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
56,023 |
|
|
$ |
51,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution of net assets from Parent |
|
$ |
112,744 |
|
|
$ |
321,609 |
|
Net carrying value of Chipeta assets in excess of consideration paid |
|
$ |
11,293 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Elimination of deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,829 |
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
5,026 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest received |
|
$ |
12,675 |
|
|
$ |
3,662 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial information for 2008 and the first six months of 2009 has been
revised to include activity attributable to the Powder River assets and Chipeta assets. See
Note 1Description of Business and Basis of PresentationPowder River acquisition and
Chipeta acquisition. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Basis of presentation
Western Gas Partners, LP (the Partnership) is a Delaware limited partnership formed in August
2007. The Partnerships assets consist of nine gathering systems, six natural gas treating
facilities, three gas processing facilities and one interstate pipeline. The Partnerships assets
are located in East and West Texas, the Rocky Mountains (Utah and Wyoming) and the Mid-Continent
(Kansas and Oklahoma). The Partnership is engaged in the business of gathering, compressing,
processing, treating and transporting natural gas for Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries and third-party producers and customers. For purposes of these financial
statements, the Partnership refers to Western Gas Partners, LP and its subsidiaries; Anadarko
refers to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, excluding the
Partnership; Parent refers to Anadarko prior to our acquisition of assets from Anadarko; and
affiliates refers to wholly owned and partially owned subsidiaries of Anadarko, excluding the
Partnership. The Partnerships general partner is Western Gas Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Anadarko.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and entities in which
it holds a controlling financial interest. All significant intercompany transactions have been
eliminated. Investments in non-controlled entities over which the Partnership exercises significant
influence are accounted for under the equity method. The information furnished herein reflects all
normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement
of financial position as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, results of operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, statement of equity and partners capital
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and statements of cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008. The Partnerships financial results for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year ending December
31, 2009.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). To conform
to these accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. These estimates are
evaluated on an ongoing basis, utilizing historical experience and other methods considered
reasonable under the particular circumstances. Although these estimates are based on managements
best available knowledge at the time, changes in facts and circumstances or discovery of new facts
or circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these
estimates. Effects on the Partnerships business, financial position and results of operations
resulting from revisions to estimates are recognized when the facts that give rise to the revision
become known.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the
Partnerships annual report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) on March 13, 2009.
Initial public offering
On May 14, 2008, the Partnership closed its initial public offering of 18,750,000 common units at a
price of $16.50 per unit. On June 11, 2008, the Partnership issued an additional 2,060,875 common
units to the public pursuant to the partial exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option.
The May 14 and June 11 issuances are referred to collectively as the initial public offering. The
common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol WES.
Concurrent with the closing of the initial public offering, Anadarko contributed the assets and
liabilities of Anadarko Gathering Company LLC (AGC), Pinnacle Gas Treating LLC (PGT) and MIGC
LLC (MIGC) to the Partnership in exchange for 1,083,115 general partner units, representing a
2.0% general partner interest in the Partnership, 100% of the incentive distribution rights
(IDRs), 5,725,431 common units and 26,536,306 subordinated units. AGC, PGT and MIGC are referred
to collectively as the initial assets. The common units issued to Anadarko include 751,625 common
units issued following the expiration of the underwriters over-allotment option and represent the
portion of the common units for which the underwriters did not exercise their over-allotment
option. See Note 4Partnership Equity and Distributions in Item 8 of the Partnerships annual
report on Form 10-K for information related to the distribution rights of the common and
subordinated unitholders and to the IDRs held by the general partner.
8
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
Powder River acquisition
In December 2008, the Partnership acquired certain midstream assets from Anadarko for consideration
consisting of (i) $175.0 million in cash, which was financed by borrowing $175.0 million from
Anadarko pursuant to the terms of a five-year term loan agreement, and (ii) the issuance of
2,556,891 common units and 52,181 general partner units. The acquisition consisted of (i) a 100%
ownership interest in the Hilight system, (ii) a 50% interest in the Newcastle system and (iii) a
14.81% limited liability company membership interest in Fort Union Gas Gathering, L.L.C. (Fort
Union). These assets are referred to collectively as the Powder River assets and the acquisition
is referred to as the Powder River acquisition.
Chipeta acquisition
In July 2009, the Partnership acquired certain midstream assets from Anadarko for (i) approximately
$101.5 million in cash, which was financed by borrowing $101.5 million from Anadarko pursuant to
the terms of a 7.0% fixed-rate, three-year term loan agreement, and the (ii) issuance of 351,424
common units and 7,172 general partner units. These assets provide processing and transportation
services in the Greater Natural Buttes area in Uintah County, Utah. The acquisition consisted of a
51% membership interest in Chipeta Processing LLC (Chipeta) and associated midstream assets.
Chipeta owns a natural gas processing plant complex, which includes two recently completed
processing trains: a refrigeration unit completed in November 2007 with a design capacity of 240
MMcf/d and a 250 MMcf/d capacity cryogenic unit which was commissioned in April 2009. The 51%
membership interest in Chipeta and associated midstream assets are referred to collectively as the
Chipeta assets and the acquisition is referred to as the Chipeta acquisition.
Presentation of Partnership acquisitions
The initial assets, Powder River assets and Chipeta assets are referred to collectively as the
Partnership Assets. References to periods prior to the Partnerships acquisition of the
Partnership Assets and similar phrases refer to periods prior to May 14, 2008, with respect to the
initial assets, periods prior to December 19, 2008, with respect to the Powder River assets and
periods prior to July 1, 2009 with respect to the Chipeta assets. Reference to periods including
and subsequent to the Partnerships acquisition of the Partnership Assets and similar phrases
refer to periods including and subsequent to May 14, 2008, with respect to the initial assets,
periods including and subsequent to December 19, 2008, with respect to the Powder River assets, and
periods including and subsequent to July 1, 2009, with respect to the Chipeta assets.
Anadarko acquired MIGC and the Powder River assets in connection with its August 23, 2006
acquisition of Western Gas Resources, Inc. (Western) and Anadarko acquired Chipeta in connection
with its August 10, 2006 acquisition of Kerr-McGee Corporation (Kerr-McGee). The acquisitions of
the Partnership Assets were considered transfers of net assets between entities under common
control. Accordingly, the Partnership is required to revise its financial statements to include the
activities of the Partnership Assets as of the date of common control. The Partnerships historical
financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the first six
months of 2009 have been recast to reflect the results attributable to the Powder River assets and
the Chipeta assets as if the Partnership owned the Powder River assets, a 51% interest in Chipeta
and associated midstream assets for all periods presented. Net income attributable to the
Partnership Assets for periods prior to the Partnerships acquisition of such assets is not
allocated to the limited partners for purposes of calculating net income per limited partner unit.
In addition to recasting the Partnerships financial statements for the Powder River assets and the
Chipeta assets, certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current
presentation.
The consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the Partnerships acquisition of the
Partnership Assets have been prepared from Anadarkos historical cost-basis accounts and may not
necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if the
Partnership had owned the assets and operated as a separate entity during the periods reported.
9
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
Anadarko Holdings of Partnership Equity
As of September 30, 2009, Anadarko held 1,143,086 general partner units representing a 2.0% general
partner interest in the Partnership, 100% of the Partnership IDRs, 8,633,746 common units and
26,536,306 subordinated units. Anadarkos common and subordinated unitholders owned an aggregate
61.5% limited partner interest in the Partnership. The public held 20,841,179 common units,
representing a 36.5% limited partner interest in the Partnership.
2. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The Partnership adopted new Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) staff guidance on
fair-value measurement, effective January 1, 2009. This guidance applies fair value measurement in
accounting for business combinations, which expands financial disclosures, defines an acquirer and
modifies the accounting for some business combination items. Under the guidance an acquirer is
required to record 100% of assets and liabilities, including goodwill, contingent assets and
contingent liabilities, at fair value. In addition, contingent consideration must be recognized at
fair value at the acquisition date, acquisition-related costs must be expensed rather than treated
as an addition to the assets acquired, and restructuring costs are required to be recognized
separately from the business combination. The Partnership will apply these provisions to
acquisitions of businesses from third parties that close after January 1, 2009. The guidance did
not change the accounting for transfers of assets between entities under common control and,
therefore, does not impact the Partnerships accounting for asset acquisitions from Anadarko.
The Partnership adopted new accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of subsidiaries, effective January 1, 2009. Specifically,
these standards require the recognition of noncontrolling interests (formerly referred to as
minority interests) as a component of total equity. These standards establish a single method of
accounting for changes in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in
deconsolidation. Dispositions of subsidiary equity are now required to be accounted for as equity
transactions. Noncontrolling interests, representing the interest in Chipeta held by Anadarko and a
third party, are presented within equity for all periods presented. Finally, consolidated net
income is presented to include the amounts attributable to the parent, general and limited partners
and the noncontrolling interests.
The Partnership also adopted new guidance which addresses the application of the two-class method
in determining net income per unit for master limited partnerships having multiple classes of
securities including limited partnership units, general partnership units and, when applicable,
IDRs of the general partner. The guidance clarifies that the two-class method would apply, and
provides the methodology for and circumstances under which undistributed earnings are allocated to
the general partner, limited partners and IDR holders. In addition, the Partnership adopted
guidance addressing whether instruments granted in equity-based payment transactions are
participating securities prior to vesting and therefore required to be accounted for in calculating
earnings per unit under the two-class method. The guidance requires companies to treat unvested
equity-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividend or dividend equivalents as
a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per unit. The Partnership adopted these
standards effective January 1, 2009 and has applied these provisions to all periods in which
earnings per unit is presented. These standards did not impact earnings per unit for the periods
presented herein.
The Partnership also adopted new guidance addressing subsequent events. The guidance does not
change the Partnerships accounting policy for subsequent events, but instead incorporates existing
accounting and disclosure requirements related to subsequent events from auditing standards into
GAAP. This standard defines subsequent events as either recognized subsequent events (events that
provide additional evidence about conditions at the balance sheet date) or nonrecognized subsequent
events (events that provide evidence about conditions that arose after the balance sheet date).
Recognized subsequent events are recorded in the financial statements for the current period
presented, while nonrecognized subsequent events are not. Both types of subsequent events require
disclosure in the consolidated financial statements if those financial statements would otherwise
be misleading. The Partnership is also required to disclose the date through which subsequent
events have been evaluated. The adoption of this standard had no impact on the Partnerships
financial statements. The Partnership has evaluated subsequent events through November 12, 2009.
10
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
The FASB also issued new accounting standards that require the Partnership to disclose the
fair value of financial instruments quarterly. The Partnership has disclosed the fair value of its
note receivable from Anadarko and its long-term debt in Note 6Transactions with Affiliates and
Note 10Debt, respectively.
3. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
In July 2009, the Partnership acquired a 51% interest in Chipeta. Chipeta is a Delaware
limited liability company formed in April 2008 to construct and operate a natural gas processing
facility. As of September 30, 2009, Chipeta is owned 51% by the Partnership, 24% by Anadarko and
25% by a third-party member. The interests in Chipeta held by Anadarko and the third-party member
are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements.
In connection with the Partnerships acquisition of its 51% membership interest in Chipeta, the
Partnership became party to Chipetas limited liability company agreement, as amended and restated
as of July 23, 2009 (the Chipeta LLC Agreement), together with Anadarko and the third-party
member. The Chipeta LLC Agreement provides that:
|
|
|
Chipetas members will be required from time to time to make capital contributions to
Chipeta to the extent approved by the members in connection with Chipetas annual budget; |
|
|
|
|
to the extent available, Chipeta will distribute cash to its members quarterly in
accordance with those members membership interests; and |
|
|
|
|
Chipetas membership interests are subject to significant restrictions on transfer. |
Upon acquisition of its interest in Chipeta, the Partnership became the managing member of Chipeta.
As managing member, the Partnership manages the day-to-day operations of Chipeta and receives a
management fee from the other members which is intended to compensate the managing member for the
performance of its duties. The Partnership may only be removed as the managing member if it is
grossly negligent or fraudulent, breaches its primary duties or fails to respond in a commercially
reasonable manner to written business proposals from the other members and such behavior, breach or
failure has a material adverse effect to Chipeta.
4. PARTNERSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS
The partnership agreement requires that, within 45 days subsequent to the end of each quarter,
beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Partnership distribute all of its available
cash (as defined in the partnership agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record
date. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Partnership paid cash distributions to
its unitholders of approximately $51.8 million, representing the $0.31 per unit distribution for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and $0.30 per unit distributions for each of the quarters ended
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the
Partnership paid cash distributions to its unitholders of approximately $8.6 million, representing
the $0.1582 per unit distribution for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. See also Note 14Subsequent
Events concerning distributions approved in October 2009.
11
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
5. NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT
The Partnerships net income attributable to the Partnership Assets for periods including and
subsequent to the Partnerships acquisitions of the Partnership Assets is allocated to the general
partner and the limited partners, including any subordinated unitholders, in accordance with their
respective ownership percentages, and when applicable, giving effect to unvested units granted
under the Western Gas Partners, LP 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and incentive
distributions allocable to the general partner. The allocation of undistributed earnings, or net
income in excess of distributions, to the incentive distribution rights is limited to available
cash (as defined by the partnership agreement) for the period. The Partnerships net income
allocable to the limited partners is allocated between the common and subordinated unitholders by
applying the provisions of the partnership agreement that govern actual cash distributions as if
all earnings for the period had been distributed. Accordingly, if current net income allocable to
the limited partners is less than the minimum quarterly distribution, or if cumulative net income
allocable to the limited partners since May 14, 2008 is less than the cumulative minimum quarterly
distributions, more income is allocated to the common unitholders than the subordinated unitholders
for that quarterly period. Basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit is calculated by
dividing limited partners interest in net income by the weighted average number of limited partner
units outstanding during the period.
The following table illustrates the Partnerships calculation of net income per unit for common and
subordinated limited partner units (in thousands, except per-unit information):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
2009(1) |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
17,949 |
|
|
$ |
58,065 |
|
|
$ |
51,671 |
|
Less pre-acquisition income allocated to Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
5,935 |
|
|
|
26,026 |
|
Less general partner interest in net income |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partner interest in net income |
|
$ |
16,707 |
|
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
51,087 |
|
|
$ |
25,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocable to common units |
|
$ |
8,818 |
|
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
|
$ |
26,838 |
|
|
$ |
12,722 |
|
Net income allocable to subordinated units |
|
|
7,889 |
|
|
|
8,524 |
|
|
|
24,249 |
|
|
|
12,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partner interest in net income |
|
$ |
16,707 |
|
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
51,087 |
|
|
$ |
25,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per limited partner unit basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
Subordinated units |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding
basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units |
|
|
29,395 |
|
|
|
26,536 |
|
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
26,536 |
|
Subordinated units |
|
|
26,536 |
|
|
|
26,536 |
|
|
|
26,536 |
|
|
|
26,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
55,931 |
|
|
|
53,072 |
|
|
|
55,736 |
|
|
|
53,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial information for 2008 and the first six months of 2009 has been
revised to include results attributable to the Chipeta assets. See Note 1Description of
Business and Basis of PresentationChipeta acquisition. |
12
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
6. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Affiliate transactions
The Partnership provides natural gas gathering, compression, processing, treating and
transportation services to Anadarko and a portion of the Partnerships expenditures are paid by or
to Anadarko, which results in affiliate transactions. Except for volumes taken in-kind by certain
producers, an affiliate of Anadarko sells the natural gas and extracted NGLs attributable to the
Partnerships processing activities, which also result in affiliate transactions. In addition,
affiliate-based transactions also result from contributions to and distributions from Fort Union
and Chipeta which are paid or received by Anadarko.
Cash management
Anadarko operates a cash management system whereby excess cash from most of its subsidiaries, held
in separate bank accounts, is generally swept to centralized accounts. Prior to May 14, 2008, with
respect to the initial assets, and prior to December 19, 2008, with respect to the Powder River
assets, sales and purchases related to third-party transactions were received or paid in cash by
Anadarko within its centralized cash management system. Anadarko charged the Partnership interest
at a variable rate on outstanding affiliate balances attributable to such assets for the periods
these balances remained outstanding. The outstanding affiliate balances were entirely settled
through an adjustment to parent net equity in connection with the initial public offering and the
Powder River acquisition. Subsequent to May 14, 2008, with respect to the initial assets, and
subsequent to December 19, 2008, with respect to the Powder River assets, the Partnership
cash-settles transactions directly with third parties and with Anadarko affiliates and
affiliate-based interest expense on current intercompany balances is not charged.
Prior to June 1, 2008, with respect to Chipeta (the date on which Anadarko initially contributed
assets to Chipeta), sales and purchases related to third-party transactions were received or paid
in cash by Anadarko within its centralized cash management system and were settled with Chipeta
through an adjustment to parent net equity. Subsequent to June 1, 2008, Chipeta cash settled
transactions directly with third parties and with Anadarko.
Note receivable from Anadarko
Concurrent with the closing of the initial public offering, the Partnership loaned $260.0 million
to Anadarko in exchange for a 30-year note bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.50%.
Interest on the note is payable quarterly. The fair value of the note receivable from Anadarko was
approximately $275.7 million and $198.1 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. The fair value of the note reflects any premium or discount for the differential
between the stated interest rate and quarter-end market rate, based on quoted market prices of
similar debt instruments.
Notes payable to Anadarko
Concurrent with the closing of the Powder River acquisition in December 2008, the Partnership
entered into a five-year, $175.0 million term loan agreement with Anadarko under which the
Partnership pays Anadarko interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% for the first two years and a floating
rate of interest at three-month LIBOR plus 150 basis points for the final three years. In July
2009, concurrent with the closing of the Chipeta acquisition, the Partnership entered into a
three-year, $101.5 million term loan agreement with Anadarko under which the Partnership paid
Anadarko interest at a fixed rate of 7.00%. See Note 10Debt. See also Note 14Subsequent Events
regarding refinancing of the three-year term loan in October 2009.
Commodity price swap agreements
The Partnership entered into commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko in December 2008 to
mitigate exposure to commodity price volatility that would otherwise be present as a result of the
Partnerships acquisition of the Hilight and Newcastle systems. Beginning on January 1, 2009, the
commodity price swap agreements fix the margin the Partnership will realize on its share of
revenues under percent-of-proceeds contracts applicable to natural gas processing activities at the
Hilight and Newcastle systems. In this regard, the Partnerships notional volumes for each of the
swap agreements are not specifically defined; instead, the commodity price swap agreements apply to
volumes equal in amount to the Partnerships share of actual volumes processed at the Hilight and
Newcastle systems. Because the notional volumes are not fixed, the commodity price swap agreements
do not satisfy the definition of a derivative financial instrument and are therefore not
13
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
required to be measured at fair value. The Partnership reports its realized gains and losses
on the commodity price swap agreements in natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales
affiliates in its consolidated statements of income in the period in which the associated revenues
are recognized. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Partnership recorded
realized gains of $1.5 million and $5.6 million, respectively, attributable to the commodity price
swap agreements.
Below is a summary of the fixed prices on the Partnerships commodity price swap agreements
outstanding as of September 30, 2009. The commodity price swap arrangements expire in December 2010
and the Partnership may annually, at its option, extend the agreements through December 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(per barrel) |
|
Natural Gasoline |
|
$ |
55.60 |
|
|
$ |
63.20 |
|
Condensate |
|
$ |
62.27 |
|
|
$ |
70.72 |
|
Propane |
|
$ |
35.56 |
|
|
$ |
40.63 |
|
Butane |
|
$ |
42.24 |
|
|
$ |
48.15 |
|
|
|
(per MMBtu) |
|
Natural Gas |
|
$ |
4.85 |
|
|
$ |
5.61 |
|
Credit facilities
In March 2008, Anadarko entered into a five-year $1.3 billion credit facility under which the
Partnership may borrow up to $100.0 million. Concurrent with the closing of the initial public
offering, the Partnership entered into a two-year $30.0 million working capital facility with
Anadarko as the lender. See Note 10Debt for more information on these credit facilities and Note
14Subsequent Events concerning the revolving Credit Facility the Partnership entered into in
October 2009.
Omnibus agreement
Concurrent with the closing of the initial public offering, the Partnership entered into an omnibus
agreement with the general partner and Anadarko that addresses the following:
|
|
|
Anadarkos obligation to indemnify the Partnership for certain liabilities and the
Partnerships obligation to indemnify Anadarko for certain liabilities with respect to the
initial assets; |
|
|
|
|
the Partnerships obligation to reimburse Anadarko for all expenses incurred or payments
made on the Partnerships behalf in conjunction with Anadarkos provision of general and
administrative services to the Partnership, including salary and benefits of the general
partners executive management and other Anadarko personnel and general and administrative
expenses which are attributable to the Partnerships status as a separate publicly traded
entity; |
|
|
|
|
the Partnerships obligation to reimburse Anadarko for all insurance coverage expenses it
incurs or payments it makes with respect to the Partnership Assets; and |
|
|
|
|
the Partnerships obligation to reimburse Anadarko for the Partnerships allocable
portion of commitment fees that Anadarko incurs under its $1.3 billion credit facility. |
Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Anadarko performs centralized corporate functions for the
Partnership, such as legal, accounting, treasury, cash management, investor relations, insurance
administration and claims processing, risk management, health, safety and environmental,
information technology, human resources, credit, payroll, internal audit, tax, marketing and
midstream administration. As of September 30, 2009, the Partnerships reimbursement to Anadarko for
certain general and administrative expenses allocated to the Partnership was capped at $6.9 million
annually through December 31, 2009, subject to adjustment to reflect expansions of the
Partnerships operations through the acquisition or construction of new assets or businesses and
with the concurrence of the special committee of the Partnerships general partners board of
directors. The cap contained in the omnibus agreement does not apply to incremental general and
administrative expenses allocated to or incurred by the Partnership as a result of being a publicly
traded partnership. The consolidated financial statements of the Partnership include costs
allocated by Anadarko pursuant to the omnibus agreement for periods including and subsequent to May
14, 2008.
14
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
Services and secondment agreement
Concurrent with the closing of the initial public offering, the general partner and Anadarko
entered into a services and secondment agreement pursuant to which specified employees of Anadarko
are seconded to the general partner to provide operating, routine maintenance and other services
with respect to the assets owned and operated by the Partnership under the direction, supervision
and control of the general partner. Pursuant to the services and secondment agreement, the
Partnership reimburses Anadarko for services provided by the seconded employees. The initial term
of the services and secondment agreement is 10 years and the term will automatically extend for
additional twelve-month periods unless either party provides 180 days written notice otherwise
before the applicable twelve-month period expires. The consolidated financial statements of the
Partnership include costs allocated by Anadarko pursuant to the services and secondment agreement
for periods including and subsequent to the Partnerships acquisition of the Partnership Assets.
Chipeta gas processing agreement
Chipeta is party to a gas processing agreement with a subsidiary of Anadarko dated September 6,
2008, pursuant to which Chipeta processes natural gas delivered by that subsidiary and the
subsidiary takes allocated residue and NGLs in-kind. That agreement, pursuant to which the Chipeta
plant receives a large majority of its throughput, has a primary term that extends through 2023.
Tax sharing agreement
Concurrent with the closing of the initial public offering, the Partnership and Anadarko entered
into a tax sharing agreement pursuant to which the Partnership reimburses Anadarko for the
Partnerships share of Texas margin tax borne by Anadarko as a result of the Partnerships results
being included in a combined or consolidated tax return filed by Anadarko with respect to periods
subsequent to the Partnerships acquisition of the Partnership Assets. Anadarko may use its tax
attributes to cause its combined or consolidated group, of which the Partnership may be a member
for this purpose, to owe no tax. However, the Partnership is nevertheless required to reimburse
Anadarko for the tax the Partnership would have owed had the attributes not been available or used
for the Partnerships benefit, regardless of whether Anadarko pays taxes for the period.
Allocation of costs
Prior to the Partnerships acquisition of the Partnership Assets, the consolidated financial
statements of the Partnership include costs allocated by Anadarko in the form of a management
services fee, which approximated the general and administrative costs attributable to the
Partnership Assets. This management services fee was allocated to the Partnership based on its
proportionate share of Anadarkos assets and revenues or other contractual arrangements. Management
believes these allocation methodologies are reasonable.
The employees supporting the Partnerships operations are employees of Anadarko. Anadarko charges
the Partnership its allocated share of personnel costs, including costs associated with Anadarkos
equity-based compensation plans, non-contributory defined pension and postretirement plans and
defined contribution savings plan, through the management services fee or pursuant to the omnibus
agreement and services and secondment agreement described above.
Equity-based compensation
Grants made under equity-based compensation plans result in equity-based compensation expense which
is determined by reference to the fair value of equity compensation as of the date of the relevant
equity grant.
Long-term incentive plan
The general partner awarded phantom units primarily to the general partners independent directors
under the LTIP in May 2008 and May 2009. The phantom units awarded to the independent directors
vest one year from the grant date. The following table summarizes information regarding phantom units under the LTIP for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009:
15
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Units outstanding at beginning of period |
|
$ |
16.50 |
|
|
|
30,304 |
|
Vested |
|
$ |
16.50 |
|
|
|
(30,304 |
) |
Granted |
|
$ |
15.02 |
|
|
|
21,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units outstanding at end of period |
|
$ |
15.02 |
|
|
|
21,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense attributable to the phantom units granted under the LTIP is recognized
entirely by the Partnership over the vesting period and was approximately $75,000 and $0.3 million
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and was approximately $0.1
million and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Equity incentive plan and Anadarko incentive plans
The Partnerships general and administrative expenses include equity-based compensation costs
allocated by Anadarko to the Partnership for grants made pursuant to the Western Gas Holdings, LLC
Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan), as well as the Anadarko
Petroleum Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2008 Omnibus
Incentive Compensation Plan (Anadarkos plans are referred to collectively as the Anadarko
Incentive Plans). Under the Incentive Plan, participants are granted Unit Value Rights (UVRs),
Unit Appreciation Rights (UARs) and Dividend Equivalent Rights (DERs). The following table
summarizes information regarding UVRs, UARs and DERs issued under the Incentive Plan for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Units outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
50,000 |
|
Granted |
|
|
10,000 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(16,667 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Units outstanding at end of period |
|
|
36,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per UVR |
|
$ |
50.00 |
|
The Partnerships general and administrative expense for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009 included approximately $0.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively, of equity-based
compensation expense for grants made pursuant to the Incentive Plan and Anadarko Incentive Plans.
The Partnerships general and administrative expense for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2008 included approximately $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of equity-based
compensation expense for grants made pursuant to the Incentive Plan and Anadarko Incentive Plans. A
portion of these expenses are allocated to the Partnership by Anadarko as a component of
compensation expense for the executive officers of the Partnerships general partner and other
employees pursuant to the omnibus agreement and employees who provide services to the Partnership
pursuant to the services and secondment agreement. These amounts exclude compensation expense
associated with the LTIP.
Summary of affiliate transactions
Operating expenses include all amounts accrued or paid to affiliates for the operation of the
Partnerships systems, whether in providing services to affiliates or to third parties, including
field labor, measurement and analysis, and other disbursements. Affiliate expenses do not bear a
direct relationship to affiliate revenues and third-party expenses do not bear a direct
16
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
relationship to third-party revenues. For example, the Partnerships affiliate expenses are
not necessarily those expenses attributable to generating affiliate revenues. The following table
summarizes affiliate transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Revenues affiliates |
|
$ |
54,718 |
|
|
$ |
82,352 |
|
|
$ |
163,901 |
|
|
$ |
246,883 |
|
Operating expenses affiliates |
|
|
10,034 |
|
|
|
16,687 |
|
|
|
29,951 |
|
|
|
45,828 |
|
Interest income affiliates |
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
12,675 |
|
|
|
6,478 |
|
Interest expense, net affiliates |
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6,698 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
Distributions to unitholders affiliates |
|
|
11,257 |
|
|
|
5,275 |
|
|
|
32,829 |
|
|
|
5,275 |
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interest owners affiliate
and Parent |
|
|
13,163 |
|
|
|
14,455 |
|
|
|
32,419 |
|
|
|
14,455 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owners affiliate
and Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,303 |
|
|
|
19,734 |
|
7. INCOME TAXES
The following table summarizes the Partnerships effective tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(in thousands, except effective tax rate) |
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
19,406 |
|
|
$ |
19,760 |
|
|
$ |
65,654 |
|
|
$ |
69,137 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
(1,463 |
) |
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
$ |
11,289 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
(0 |
)% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Income earned by the Partnership, a non-taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was subject only to Texas margin tax while
income earned by the Partnership and attributable to the initial assets prior to May 14, 2008 and
to the Powder River assets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, was subject to
federal and state income tax. Income attributable to the Chipeta assets was subject to federal and
state income tax for periods prior to June 1, 2008, at which time substantially all of the Chipeta
assets were contributed to a non-taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For 2008 and
2009, the Partnerships variance from the federal statutory rate is primarily attributable to the
Partnerships status as a non-taxable entity beginning on May 14, 2008, partially offset by state
income tax expense.
The increase in income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is primarily due
to a net income tax benefit resulting from the impairment loss recorded on an asset at the Hilight
system during the three months ended September 30, 2008, partially offset by Texas margin tax expense
attributable to the initial assets and federal income tax attributable to the Newcastle system. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, income tax expense decreased
primarily due to a change in the applicability of U.S. federal income tax to the
Partnerships income that occurred in connection with its initial public offering. In addition, for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Partnerships estimated income attributed to Texas
relative to the Partnerships total income decreased as compared to the prior year, which resulted
in a $0.5 million reduction of previously recognized deferred taxes.
17
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
8. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Anadarko was the only customer from whom revenues exceeded 10% of the Partnerships consolidated
revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The percentage of
revenues from Anadarko and the Partnerships other customers are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Customer |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Anadarko |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
Other |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of the historical cost of the Partnerships property, plant and equipment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
useful life |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Land |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
354 |
|
|
$ |
354 |
|
Gathering systems |
|
|
15 to 25 years |
|
|
|
804,952 |
|
|
|
697,908 |
|
Pipeline and equipment |
|
|
30 to 34.5 years |
|
|
|
86,520 |
|
|
|
85,598 |
|
Assets under construction |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
7,827 |
|
|
|
76,275 |
|
Other |
|
|
3 to 25 years |
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
901,340 |
|
|
|
861,780 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,683 |
|
|
|
175,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
696,657 |
|
|
$ |
686,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost of property classified as Assets under construction is excluded from capitalized
costs being depreciated. This amount represents property that is not yet suitable to be placed into
productive service as of the balance sheet date.
Impairment
Prior to the Partnerships acquisition of the Powder River assets, during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, a $9.4 million impairment was recognized related to the shut-in of a unit
that produced iso-butane from NGLs at the Hilight system. Anadarkos management determined the fair
value of the asset based on estimates of significant unobservable inputs (level three in the GAAP
fair value hierarchy), including current market values of similar equipment components.
10. DEBT
The following table presents the Partnerships outstanding debt as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Rate |
|
Principal |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to Anadarko due 2012
|
|
$ |
101,451 |
|
|
$ |
101,451 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to Anadarko due 2013
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$ |
276,451 |
|
|
$ |
276,451 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
% |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2008, Anadarko entered into a five-year $1.3 billion credit facility under which the
Partnership may utilize up to $100.0 million to the extent that sufficient amounts remain available
to Anadarko. As of September 30, 2009, the full $100.0 million was available for borrowing by the
Partnership. Interest on borrowings under the credit facility is calculated based on the election
by the borrower of either: (i) a floating rate equal to the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%
or (ii) a periodic fixed rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin,
which was 0.44% at
18
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
September 30, 2009, and the commitment fees on the facility are based on Anadarkos senior
unsecured long-term debt rating. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, as a co-borrower under
Anadarkos credit facility, the Partnership is required to reimburse Anadarko for its allocable
portion of commitment fees (as of September 30, 2009, 0.11% of the Partnerships committed and
available borrowing capacity, including the Partnerships outstanding balances, if any) that
Anadarko incurs under its credit facility, or up to $0.1 million annually. Under Anadarkos credit
facilities, the Partnership and Anadarko are required to comply with certain covenants, including a
financial covenant that requires Anadarko to maintain a debt-to-capitalization ratio of 60% or
less. As of September 30, 2009, Anadarko and the Partnership were in compliance with all covenants.
Should the Partnership or Anadarko fail to comply with any covenant in Anadarkos credit
facilities, the Partnership may not be permitted to borrow under the credit facility. Anadarko is a
guarantor of the Partnerships borrowings, if any, under the credit facility. The Partnership is
not a guarantor of Anadarkos borrowings under the credit facility. The $1.3 billion credit
facility expires in March 2013.
In May 2008, the Partnership entered into a two-year $30.0 million working capital facility with
Anadarko as the lender. At September 30, 2009, no borrowings were outstanding under the working
capital facility. The facility is available exclusively to fund working capital needs. Borrowings
under the facility will bear interest at the same rate that would apply to borrowings under the
Anadarko credit facility described above. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, the Partnership pays a
commitment fee of 0.11% annually to Anadarko on the unused portion of the working capital facility,
or up to $33,000 annually. The Partnership is required to reduce all borrowings under the working
capital facility to zero for a period of at least 15 consecutive days at least once during each of
the twelve-month periods prior to the maturity date of the facility.
In December 2008, the Partnership entered into a five-year $175.0 million term loan agreement with
Anadarko in order to finance the cash portion of the consideration paid for the Powder River
acquisition. The interest rate is fixed at 4.00% for the first two years and is a floating rate
equal to three-month LIBOR plus 150 basis points for the final three years. The Partnership has the
option to repay the outstanding principal amount in whole or in part commencing upon the second
anniversary of the five-year term loan agreement.
In July 2009, the Partnership entered into a $101.5 million, 7.00% fixed-rate, three-year term loan
agreement with Anadarko in order to finance the cash portion of the consideration paid for the
Chipeta acquisition. The Partnership had the option to repay the outstanding principal amount in
whole or in part upon five business days written notice. See also Note 14Subsequent Events
regarding the Partnerships $350.0 million revolving Credit Facility and refinancing of the
three-year term loan in October 2009.
The provisions of the five-year and three-year term loan agreements discussed above are
non-recourse to the Partnerships general partner and limited partners and contain customary events
of default, including (i) nonpayment of principal when due or nonpayment of interest or other
amounts within three business days of when due; (ii) certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency
with respect to the Partnership; or (iii) a change of control. At September 30, 2009, the
Partnership was in compliance with all covenants under the five-year term loan agreement and
three-year term loan agreement. The fair value of the Partnerships debt under both the five-year
and three-year term loan agreements approximate the carrying value of those instruments at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The fair value of debt reflects any premium or discount
for the difference between the stated interest rate and quarter-end market rate.
11. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Partnerships operations are organized into a single business segment, the assets of which
consist of natural gas gathering and processing systems, treating facilities, pipelines and related
plants and equipment. To assess the operating results of the Partnerships segment, management uses
Adjusted EBITDA, which it defines as net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP,
plus distributions from equity investee, non-cash equity-based compensation expense, interest
expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, less income from equity investee,
interest income, income tax benefit and other income (expense). The Partnership changed its definition of Adjusted EBITDA from the definition
used in the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA has been calculated using the revised definition for all
periods presented.
Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure that management and external users of the
Partnerships consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, commercial
banks and rating agencies, use to assess, among other measures:
19
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
|
|
|
the Partnerships operating performance as compared to other publicly traded partnerships
in the midstream energy industry, without regard to financing methods, capital structure or
historical cost basis; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Partnerships assets to generate cash flow to make distributions; and |
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the returns on
investment of various investment opportunities. |
Management believes that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides information useful in
assessing the Partnerships financial condition and results of operations and that Adjusted EBITDA
is a widely accepted financial indicator of a companys ability to incur and service debt, fund
capital expenditures and make distributions. Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by the Partnership, may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Therefore, the
Partnerships consolidated Adjusted EBITDA should be considered in conjunction with net income and
other performance measures, such as operating income or cash flow from operating activities.
Below is a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income attributable to Western Gas Partners,
LP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income
attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
26,404 |
|
|
$ |
30,488 |
|
|
$ |
81,542 |
|
|
$ |
93,633 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions from equity investee |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
4,125 |
|
|
|
3,673 |
|
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
Interest expense, net affiliates |
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6,698 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,289 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (1) |
|
|
9,586 |
|
|
|
9,012 |
|
|
|
28,101 |
|
|
|
25,775 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income, net |
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
5,329 |
|
|
|
3,840 |
|
Interest income from note affiliate |
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
12,675 |
|
|
|
6,478 |
|
Other income, net (1) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
17,949 |
|
|
$ |
58,065 |
|
|
$ |
51,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense and other income, net for purposes of
reconciling Adjusted EBITDA to net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP, includes
51% of the respective amounts attributable to Chipeta Processing LLC. |
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental
The Partnership is subject to federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality,
hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters. Management believes there are
no such matters that could have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships results of
operations, cash flows or financial position.
20
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
Litigation and legal proceedings
From time to time, the Partnership is involved in legal, tax, regulatory and other proceedings in
various forums regarding performance, contracts and other matters that arise in the ordinary course
of business. Management is not aware of any such proceeding for which a final disposition could
have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships results of operations, cash flows or financial
position.
Plant purchase commitment
In November 2008, Chipeta entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the Purchase Agreement)
with a third party to purchase a compressor station and processing plant (the Natural Buttes
plant) located in Uintah County, Utah for $9.0 million, subject to customary closing adjustments. One of the noncontrolling interest owners
contributed $2.2 million to Chipeta during the three months ended September 30, 2009 to fund its
proportionate share of the Natural Buttes plant acquisition. The Natural Buttes plant is expected
to provide up to 150 MMcf/d of incremental refrigeration processing capacity and 5.2 miles of
20-inch pipeline. If the transaction does not close by December 31, 2009, Chipeta, at its sole
discretion, may terminate the Purchase Agreement.
Lease commitments
Anadarko, on behalf of the Partnership, formerly leased compression equipment used exclusively by
the Partnership. As a result of lease modifications in October 2008, Anadarko became the owner of
the compression equipment and contributed the equipment to the Partnership, effectively terminating
the lease. Rent expense associated with the compression equipment was approximately $0.3 million
and $0.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. As of
September 30, 2009, the Partnership does not have significant non-cancelable lease commitments.
13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Partnership filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC, which became
effective in August 2009, under which the Partnership may issue and sell up to $1.25 billion of
debt and equity securities. Debt securities issued under the shelf may be guaranteed by one or more
existing or future subsidiaries of the Partnership (the Guarantor Subsidiaries), each of which is
a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership. The guarantees, if issued, would be full,
unconditional, joint and several. The following condensed consolidating financial information
reflects the Partnerships stand-alone accounts, the combined accounts of the Guarantor
Subsidiaries, the accounts of the Non-Guarantor Subsidiary, consolidating adjustments and
eliminations, and the Partnerships consolidated accounts for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and as of September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008. The condensed consolidating financial information should be read in
conjunction with the Partnerships accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and
related notes.
21
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
Western Gas Partners, LPs and the Guarantor Subsidiaries investment in and equity income
from their consolidated subsidiaries is presented in accordance with the equity method of
accounting in which the equity income from consolidated subsidiaries includes the results of
operations of the Partnership Assets for periods including and subsequent to the Partnerships
acquisition of the Partnership Assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Western Gas |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
Partners, LP |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,538 |
|
|
$ |
48,830 |
|
|
$ |
10,628 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60,996 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
5,557 |
|
|
|
30,978 |
|
|
|
6,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4,019 |
) |
|
$ |
17,852 |
|
|
$ |
4,462 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,295 |
|
Interest income, net affiliates |
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Equity income from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
19,963 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
17,047 |
|
|
$ |
20,133 |
|
|
$ |
4,465 |
|
|
$ |
(22,239 |
) |
|
$ |
19,406 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,047 |
|
|
$ |
19,962 |
|
|
$ |
4,465 |
|
|
$ |
(22,239 |
) |
|
$ |
19,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
17,047 |
|
|
$ |
17,775 |
|
|
$ |
4,465 |
|
|
$ |
(22,239 |
) |
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Western Gas |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
Partners, LP |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,341 |
|
|
$ |
12,241 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
94,582 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
71,012 |
|
|
|
5,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,003 |
) |
|
$ |
11,329 |
|
|
$ |
6,647 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,973 |
|
Interest income, net affiliates |
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
Equity income from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
16,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
17,751 |
|
|
$ |
11,786 |
|
|
$ |
6,680 |
|
|
$ |
(16,457 |
) |
|
$ |
19,760 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,751 |
|
|
$ |
13,249 |
|
|
$ |
6,680 |
|
|
$ |
(16,457 |
) |
|
$ |
21,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
17,751 |
|
|
$ |
9,975 |
|
|
$ |
6,680 |
|
|
$ |
(16,457 |
) |
|
$ |
17,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Western Gas |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
Partners, LP |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
5,605 |
|
|
$ |
146,197 |
|
|
$ |
30,859 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
182,661 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
94,521 |
|
|
|
15,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(7,817 |
) |
|
$ |
51,676 |
|
|
$ |
15,789 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
59,648 |
|
Interest income, net affiliates |
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,977 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
Equity income from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
53,957 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
52,129 |
|
|
$ |
53,963 |
|
|
$ |
15,795 |
|
|
$ |
(56,233 |
) |
|
$ |
65,654 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
52,129 |
|
|
$ |
54,115 |
|
|
$ |
15,795 |
|
|
$ |
(56,233 |
) |
|
$ |
65,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
52,129 |
|
|
$ |
46,374 |
|
|
$ |
15,795 |
|
|
$ |
(56,233 |
) |
|
$ |
58,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Western Gas |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
Partners, LP |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
254,371 |
|
|
$ |
24,709 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
279,080 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
4,398 |
|
|
|
198,614 |
|
|
|
12,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4,398 |
) |
|
$ |
55,757 |
|
|
$ |
12,687 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,046 |
|
Interest income, net affiliates |
|
|
6,391 |
|
|
|
(1,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
Equity income from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
23,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
26,001 |
|
|
$ |
54,303 |
|
|
$ |
12,721 |
|
|
$ |
(23,888 |
) |
|
$ |
69,137 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,172 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
26,001 |
|
|
$ |
43,131 |
|
|
$ |
12,604 |
|
|
$ |
(23,888 |
) |
|
$ |
57,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
26,001 |
|
|
$ |
36,954 |
|
|
$ |
12,604 |
|
|
$ |
(23,888 |
) |
|
$ |
51,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Western Gas |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Partners, LP |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
43,079 |
|
|
$ |
29,511 |
|
|
$ |
15,293 |
|
|
$ |
(25,548 |
) |
|
$ |
62,335 |
|
Note receivable Anadarko |
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
481,969 |
|
|
|
102,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(584,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
520,962 |
|
|
|
175,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696,657 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
40,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
785,691 |
|
|
$ |
693,615 |
|
|
$ |
190,755 |
|
|
$ |
(610,172 |
) |
|
$ |
1,059,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
26,150 |
|
|
$ |
16,889 |
|
|
$ |
4,047 |
|
|
$ |
(25,548 |
) |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
Notes payable Anadarko |
|
|
276,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,451 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,610 |
|
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
302,601 |
|
|
$ |
26,499 |
|
|
$ |
5,610 |
|
|
$ |
(25,548 |
) |
|
$ |
309,162 |
|
Partners capital |
|
$ |
483,090 |
|
|
$ |
580,661 |
|
|
$ |
185,145 |
|
|
$ |
(584,624 |
) |
|
$ |
664,272 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, equity and Partners capital |
|
$ |
785,691 |
|
|
$ |
693,615 |
|
|
$ |
190,755 |
|
|
$ |
(610,172 |
) |
|
$ |
1,059,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Western Gas |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Partners, LP |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
33,774 |
|
|
$ |
49,207 |
|
|
$ |
2,999 |
|
|
$ |
(38,825 |
) |
|
$ |
47,155 |
|
Note receivable Anadarko |
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
458,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(458,256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
527,790 |
|
|
|
158,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686,353 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
39,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
752,931 |
|
|
$ |
616,016 |
|
|
$ |
161,289 |
|
|
$ |
(497,081 |
) |
|
$ |
1,033,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
51,656 |
|
|
$ |
16,003 |
|
|
$ |
26,094 |
|
|
$ |
(51,318 |
) |
|
$ |
42,435 |
|
Note payable Anadarko |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
226,656 |
|
|
$ |
26,243 |
|
|
$ |
26,949 |
|
|
$ |
(51,318 |
) |
|
$ |
228,530 |
|
Partners capital and parent net investment |
|
$ |
526,275 |
|
|
$ |
523,757 |
|
|
$ |
134,340 |
|
|
$ |
(445,763 |
) |
|
$ |
738,609 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, equity and Partners capital |
|
$ |
752,931 |
|
|
$ |
616,016 |
|
|
$ |
161,289 |
|
|
$ |
(497,081 |
) |
|
$ |
1,033,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Western Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners, |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows |
|
LP |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
52,129 |
|
|
$ |
54,115 |
|
|
$ |
15,795 |
|
|
$ |
(56,233 |
) |
|
$ |
65,806 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(53,957 |
) |
|
|
(2,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
26,457 |
|
|
|
3,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,642 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(336 |
) |
Change in other items, net |
|
|
(25,849 |
) |
|
|
17,624 |
|
|
|
(19,728 |
) |
|
|
12,492 |
|
|
|
(15,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(27,636 |
) |
|
$ |
95,584 |
|
|
$ |
(789 |
) |
|
$ |
12,492 |
|
|
$ |
79,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chipeta acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(101,451 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(101,451 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,779 |
) |
|
|
(22,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,500 |
) |
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(120,494 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,721 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(143,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of note payable to Anadarko |
|
$ |
101,451 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
101,451 |
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interest owners and Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,745 |
|
Distributions to unitholders |
|
|
(51,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,777 |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owners
and Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,737 |
) |
Net (distributions to) contributions from Parent |
|
|
(13,586 |
) |
|
|
(10,098 |
) |
|
|
35,007 |
|
|
|
(12,492 |
) |
|
|
(1,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
$ |
36,088 |
|
|
$ |
24,910 |
|
|
$ |
35,007 |
|
|
$ |
(12,492 |
) |
|
$ |
83,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
8,452 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,497 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,949 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
33,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
41,758 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,265 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Western Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners, |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows |
|
LP |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
26,001 |
|
|
$ |
43,131 |
|
|
$ |
12,604 |
|
|
$ |
(23,888 |
) |
|
$ |
57,848 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(23,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
33,946 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,244 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
Change in other items, net |
|
|
27,535 |
|
|
|
(24,833 |
) |
|
|
17,981 |
|
|
|
(12,493 |
) |
|
|
8,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
29,673 |
|
|
$ |
54,560 |
|
|
$ |
32,975 |
|
|
$ |
(12,493 |
) |
|
$ |
104,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to Anadarko |
|
$ |
(260,000 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(260,000 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
(33,177 |
) |
|
|
(35,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68,930 |
) |
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(260,312 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,272 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,441 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(337,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common units |
|
$ |
315,161 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
315,161 |
|
Reimbursement to Parent from offering proceeds |
|
|
(45,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,161 |
) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interest owners and Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,356 |
|
Distributions to unitholders |
|
|
(8,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,567 |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owners and Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,734 |
) |
Net (distribution to) contribution from Parent |
|
|
(4,404 |
) |
|
|
(141,910 |
) |
|
|
27,466 |
|
|
|
12,493 |
|
|
|
(106,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
$ |
257,029 |
|
|
$ |
(13,288 |
) |
|
$ |
27,466 |
|
|
$ |
12,493 |
|
|
$ |
283,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
26,390 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,390 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
26,390 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Cash distribution
On October 20, 2009, the board of directors of the Partnerships general partner declared a cash
distribution to the Partnerships unitholders of $0.32 per unit, or $18.3 million in the aggregate.
The cash distribution is payable on November 13, 2009 to unitholders of record at the close of
business on October 30, 2009.
Revolving credit facility
On October 29, 2009, the Partnership entered into a three-year senior unsecured revolving credit
facility with a group of banks (the Credit Facility). The aggregate initial commitments of the
lenders under the Credit Facility are $350.0 million and are expandable to a maximum of $450.0
million. The Credit Facility matures on October 29, 2012 and bears interest at LIBOR, plus
applicable margins ranging from 2.375% to 3.250%, or an alternate base rate, based upon (i) the
greater of the
Prime Rate, the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, and LIBOR plus 0.50% plus (ii) applicable margins
ranging from 1.375% to 2.250%.
26
Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements of Western Gas Partners, LP
The Credit Facility contains various covenants that limit, among other things, the
Partnerships, and certain of the Partnerships subsidiaries, ability to incur indebtedness, grant
certain liens, merge, consolidate or allow any material change in the character of its business,
sell all or substantially all of the Partnerships assets, make certain transfers, enter into
certain affiliate transactions, make distributions or other payments other than distributions of
available cash under certain conditions and use proceeds other than for partnership purposes. If
the Partnership obtains two of the following three ratings: BBB- or better by Standard and Poors,
Baa3 or better by Moodys Investors Service or BBB- or better by Fitch Ratings Ltd. (the date of
such rating being the Investment Grade Rating Date), the Partnership will no longer be required
to comply with certain of the foregoing covenants. The Credit Facility also contains customary
events of default, including (i) nonpayment of principal when due or nonpayment of interest or
other amounts within three business days of when due; (ii) bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to
the Borrower or any material subsidiary; or (iii) a change of control. All amounts due by the
Partnership under the Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by the Partnerships wholly
owned subsidiaries. The subsidiary guarantees will terminate on the Investment Grade Rating Date.
On October 30, 2009, the Partnership used $100.0 million of its capacity under the Credit Facility
along with $2.0 million of cash on hand to refinance its $101.5 million, 7.00% fixed-rate,
three-year term loan agreement entered into with Anadarko in July 2009 to finance a portion of the
Chipeta acquisition, and to settle accrued interest related thereto.
27
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following discussion analyzes our financial condition and results of operations and should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to unaudited
consolidated financial statements, which are included in this report
under Part I, Item 1
of this Form 10-Q, as well as our historical consolidated financial statements, and the notes
thereto, included in Item 8 of our annual report on Form 10-K. Unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise, references in this report to the Partnership, we, our, us or like terms refer to
Western Gas Partners, LP and its subsidiaries. Anadarko refers to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
(NYSE: APC) and its consolidated subsidiaries, excluding the Partnership and Parent refers to
Anadarko prior to our acquisition of assets from Anadarko. Affiliates refers to wholly owned and
partially owned subsidiaries of Anadarko, excluding the Partnership.
We have made in this report, and may from time to time otherwise make in other public filings,
press releases and discussions by Partnership management, forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 concerning our operations, economic performance and financial condition. These statements
can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology including may, believe, expect,
anticipate, estimate, continue, or other similar words. These statements discuss future
expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial condition or include other
forward-looking information. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will
prove to have been correct.
These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to,
the following risks and uncertainties:
|
|
|
our assumptions about energy markets; |
|
|
|
future gathering, treating and processing volumes and pipeline throughput, including
Anadarkos production, which is gathered by or transported through our assets; |
|
|
|
competitive conditions; |
|
|
|
the availability of capital resources for capital expenditures and other contractual
obligations; |
|
|
|
the supply of, demand for, and the price of oil, natural gas, NGLs and other products
or services; |
|
|
|
the availability of goods and services; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either internationally or nationally or in the
jurisdictions in which we are doing business; |
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in environmental regulation,
environmental risks, regulations by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, and
liability under federal and state environmental laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
our ability to access the capital markets; |
|
|
|
our ability to access credit, including under Anadarkos $1.3 billion credit facility
and the $350.0 million Credit Facility we entered into in October 2009; |
|
|
|
our ability to maintain and/or obtain rights to operate our assets on land owned by
third parties; |
|
|
|
our ability to acquire assets on acceptable terms; |
|
|
|
non-payment or non-performance of Anadarko or other significant customers, including
under our gathering, processing and transportation agreements and our $260.0 million note
receivable from Anadarko; and
|
28
|
|
|
other factors discussed below and elsewhere in Item 1ARisk Factors and in Item
7Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates included in our annual report on Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 13, 2009, this Form 10-Q and
in our other public filings and press releases. |
The risk factors and other factors noted throughout or incorporated by reference in this report
could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statement. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We are a growth-oriented limited partnership organized by Anadarko to own, operate, acquire and
develop midstream energy assets. We currently operate in East and West Texas, the Rocky Mountains
(Utah and Wyoming) and the Mid-Continent (Kansas and Oklahoma) and are engaged in the business of
gathering, compressing, treating, processing and transporting natural gas for Anadarko and
third-party producers and customers.
Significant operational and financial highlights during the third quarter of 2009 include:
|
|
|
The completion of our acquisition of a 51% membership interest in Chipeta Processing
LLC, or Chipeta, and related midstream assets from Anadarko. The Chipeta plant had gross
average daily natural gas liquids (NGLs) recoveries of approximately 14,000 barrels per
day. |
|
|
|
Our stable operating cash flow, combined with a focus on cost reduction and capital
spending discipline, enabled us to raise our distribution to $0.32 per unit, representing a
3.2% increase over the distribution for the second quarter of 2009. |
|
|
|
Third-quarter throughput attributable to Western Gas
Partners, LP totaled approximately 1,209 MMcf/d, representing an
approximate 8% decrease compared to the third quarter of 2008. The current commodity price
environment, particularly for natural gas, has resulted in lower drilling activity
throughout the areas in which we operate, which limits our ability to connect wells to our
systems which offset lower throughput from natural production declines. The throughput
decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is primarily due to decreases at the
Pinnacle, Dew, Haley and Hugoton systems, mainly from natural production declines,
partially offset by affiliate-throughput increases at the Chipeta plant and Fort Union
system due to facility expansions. |
|
|
|
Third-quarter gross margin attributable to Western Gas
Partners, LP averaged approximately $0.40 per Mcf, representing an
approximate 2% decrease compared to the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in gross margin
is primarily due to throughput at the Chipeta plant, which generates a lower margin per Mcf
than our other core assets, and to lower drip condensate margins. The predominantly
fee-based and fixed-price structure of our contracts mitigated the impact of changes in
commodity prices on our gross margin. |
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
On May 14, 2008, we closed our initial public offering of 18,750,000 common units at a price of
$16.50 per unit. On June 11, 2008, we issued an additional 2,060,875 common units to the public
pursuant to the partial exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option granted in connection
with our initial public offering. Concurrent with the closing of our initial public offering,
Anadarko contributed the assets and liabilities of Anadarko Gathering Company LLC, or AGC, Pinnacle
Gas Treating LLC, or PGT, and MIGC LLC, or MIGC, to us in exchange for a 2.0% general partner
interest in the Partnership, 5,725,431 common units, 26,536,306 subordinated units and 100% of the
incentive distribution rights, or IDRs. We refer to AGC, PGT and MIGC as our initial assets.
POWDER RIVER ACQUISITION
In December 2008, we acquired certain midstream assets from Anadarko, consisting of (i) a 100%
ownership interest in the Hilight system, (ii) a 50% interest in the Newcastle system and (iii) a
14.81% limited liability company membership interest in Fort Union Gas Gathering, L.L.C., or Fort
Union. We refer to these assets collectively as the Powder River assets and to the acquisition as
the Powder River acquisition. The Powder River assets provide a combination of gathering,
treating and processing services in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming.
29
CHIPETA ACQUISITION
In July 2009, we acquired certain midstream assets from Anadarko for (i) approximately $101.5
million cash, which was financed by borrowing $101.5 million from Anadarko pursuant to the terms of
a 7.00% fixed-rate, three-year term loan agreement, and (ii) the issuance of 351,424 common units
and 7,172 general partner units. These assets provide processing and transportation services in the
Greater Natural Buttes area in Uintah County, Utah. The acquisition is comprised of a 51%
membership interest in Chipeta and associated midstream assets. Chipeta owns a natural gas
processing plant complex, which includes two recently completed processing trains: a refrigeration
unit completed in November 2007 with a design capacity of 240 MMcf/d and a 250 MMcf/d capacity
cryogenic unit which was commissioned in April 2009. The 51% membership interest in Chipeta and
associated midstream assets are referred to collectively as the Chipeta assets and the
acquisition is referred to as the Chipeta acquisition.
PRESENTATION OF PARTNERSHIP ACQUISITIONS
The initial assets, Powder River assets and Chipeta assets are referred to collectively as the
Partnership Assets. References to periods prior to our acquisition of the Partnership Assets
and similar phrases refer to periods prior to May 14, 2008, with respect to the initial assets,
periods prior to December 19, 2008, with respect to the Powder River assets, and periods prior to
July 1, 2009 with respect to the Chipeta assets. Reference to periods including and subsequent to
our acquisition of the Partnership Assets and similar phrases refer to periods including and
subsequent to May 14, 2008, with respect to the initial assets, periods including and subsequent to
December 19, 2008, with respect to the Powder River assets, and periods including and subsequent to
July 1, 2009, with respect to the Chipeta assets.
The acquisitions of the Partnership Assets were considered transfers of net assets between entities
under common control. Accordingly, we are required to revise our financial statements to include
the activities of the Partnership Assets as of the date of common control. Our historical financial
statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the first six months of 2009
have been recast to reflect the results attributable to the Powder River assets and the Chipeta
assets as if the Partnership owned the Powder River assets, a 51% interest in Chipeta and
associated midstream assets for all periods presented.
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
On April 15, 2009, after receiving the unanimous approval of the special committee of the board of
directors of Western Gas Holdings, LLC, the Partnerships general partner, the general partners
board of directors unanimously approved an amendment (the Amendment) to the Partnerships First
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, effective on the date of approval. The
purpose of the Amendment was to ensure that the Partnerships common unitholders maintain, to the
maximum extent possible, their existing share of allocable tax deductions throughout the
subordination period. Absent the Amendment, it would have been possible, as a result of equity
issuances at a price less than the initial public offering price during the subordination period,
that the common unitholders allocable share of tax deductions would be significantly diminished.
The foregoing general description of the Amendment is not complete and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the full and complete terms of the Amendment, which is attached to the Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on April 20, 2009, and the partnership agreement, which is incorporated herein.
30
HOW WE EVALUATE OUR OPERATIONS
Our management relies on certain financial and operational metrics to analyze our performance.
These metrics are significant factors in assessing our operating results and profitability and
include (1) throughput, (2) operating expenses, (3) Adjusted EBITDA and (4) gross margin.
Throughput
In order to maintain or increase throughput on our gathering and processing systems, we must
connect additional wells to our systems. Our success in maintaining or increasing throughput is
impacted by successful drilling of new wells by producers that are dedicated to our systems, our
ability to secure volumes from new wells drilled on non-dedicated acreage and our ability to
attract natural gas volumes currently gathered, processed or treated by our competitors.
To maintain and increase throughput on our MIGC system, we must continue to contract capacity to
shippers, including producers and marketers, for transportation of their natural gas. Although firm
capacity on the MIGC system is fully subscribed, we nevertheless monitor producer and marketing
activities in the area served by our transportation system to identify new opportunities and to
attempt to maintain a full subscription of MIGCs firm capacity.
Operating expenses
We analyze operating expenses to evaluate our performance. Operating expenses include all amounts
accrued or paid for the operation of our systems, including cost of product, utilities, field
labor, measurement and analysis and other disbursements. The primary components of our operating
expenses that we evaluate include operation and maintenance expenses, cost of product expenses and
general and administrative expenses.
Operation and maintenance expenses include, among other things, direct labor, insurance, repair and
maintenance, contract services, utility costs and services provided to us or on our behalf. For
periods commencing on and subsequent to our acquisition of the Partnership Assets, certain of these
expenses are incurred under and governed by our services and secondment agreement with Anadarko.
Cost of product expenses include (i) costs associated with the purchase of natural gas and NGLs
pursuant to our percent-of-proceeds processing contracts, (ii) costs associated with the valuation
of our gas imbalances, (iii) costs associated with our obligations under certain contracts to
redeliver a volume of natural gas to shippers which is thermally equivalent to condensate retained
by us and sold to third parties and (iv) costs associated with our fuel-tracking mechanism, which
tracks the difference between actual fuel usage and loss and amounts recovered for estimated fuel
usage and loss pursuant to our contracts. These expenses are subject to variability, although our
exposure to commodity price risk attributable to our percent-of-proceeds contracts is mitigated
through our commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko.
General and administrative expenses for periods prior to our acquisition of the Partnership Assets
include reimbursements attributable to costs incurred by Anadarko on our behalf and allocations of
general and administrative costs by Anadarko to us. For these periods, Anadarko received
compensation or reimbursement through a management services fee. For periods subsequent to our
acquisition of the Partnership Assets, Anadarko is no longer compensated for corporate services
through a management services fee. Instead, we reimburse Anadarko for general and administrative
expenses it incurs on our behalf pursuant to the terms of our omnibus agreement with Anadarko.
Amounts required to be reimbursed to Anadarko under the omnibus agreement include those expenses
attributable to our status as a publicly traded partnership, such as:
|
|
|
expenses associated with annual and quarterly reporting; |
|
|
|
tax return and Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution expenses; |
|
|
|
expenses associated with listing on the New York Stock Exchange; and |
|
|
|
independent auditor fees, legal expenses, investor relations expenses, director fees, and
registrar and transfer agent fees. |
In addition to the above, we are required pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement with
Anadarko to reimburse Anadarko for allocable general and administrative expenses. As of September
30, 2009, the amount required to be reimbursed by us to Anadarko for certain allocated general and
administrative expenses is capped at $6.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, subject to adjustment to reflect expansions of our operations through the
acquisition or
31
construction of new assets or businesses and with the concurrence of the special
committee of our general partners board of directors. If the Omnibus Agreement is not amended by
the parties, our general partner will determine the general and administrative expenses to be
reimbursed by us in accordance with our partnership agreement for periods subsequent to December
31, 2009. The cap contained in the omnibus agreement does not apply to incremental general and
administrative expenses incurred by or allocated to us as a result of being a separate publicly
traded entity. We currently expect public company expenses not subject to the cap contained in the
omnibus agreement to be approximately $6.4 million per year, excluding equity-based compensation
and transaction costs related to the Chipeta acquisition and future acquisitions.
Adjusted EBITDA
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP, plus
distributions from equity investee, non-cash equity-based compensation expense, interest expense,
income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, less income from equity investments, interest
income, income tax benefit and other income (expense). We changed our definition of Adjusted EBITDA
from the definition used in the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA has been calculated using the revised
definition for all periods presented. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides
information useful to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations and
that Adjusted EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator of a companys ability to incur and
service debt, fund capital expenditures and make distributions. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental
financial measure that management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such
as industry analysts, investors, commercial banks and rating agencies, use to assess, among other
measures:
|
|
|
our operating performance as compared to other publicly traded partnerships in the
midstream energy industry, without regard to financing methods, capital structure or
historical cost basis; |
|
|
|
the ability of our assets to generate cash flow to make distributions; and |
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the returns on
investment of various investment opportunities. |
The following tables present a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA
to the GAAP financial measures of net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP and net cash
provided by operating activities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
2009(1) |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
|
Reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
26,404 |
|
|
$ |
30,488 |
|
|
$ |
81,542 |
|
|
$ |
93,633 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions from equity investee |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
4,125 |
|
|
|
3,673 |
|
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
Interest expense, net affiliates |
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6,698 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,289 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (2) |
|
|
9,586 |
|
|
|
9,012 |
|
|
|
28,101 |
|
|
|
25,775 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income, net |
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
5,329 |
|
|
|
3,840 |
|
Interest income from note affiliate |
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
12,675 |
|
|
|
6,478 |
|
Other income, net (2) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
17,949 |
|
|
$ |
58,065 |
|
|
$ |
51,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
2009(1) |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
Reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
26,404 |
|
|
$ |
30,488 |
|
|
$ |
81,542 |
|
|
$ |
93,633 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
2,816 |
|
|
|
3,627 |
|
|
|
9,280 |
|
|
|
7,275 |
|
Interest income, net affiliates |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
5,977 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
(2,736 |
) |
|
|
(785 |
) |
Current income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(8,856 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Distributions from equity investee less than equity income, net |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Changes in operating working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and natural gas imbalance receivable |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(9,481 |
) |
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
(12,014 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and natural gas imbalance payable |
|
|
(6,638 |
) |
|
|
14,145 |
|
|
|
(17,007 |
) |
|
|
21,683 |
|
Other, including changes in non-current assets and liabilities |
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
21,444 |
|
|
$ |
45,793 |
|
|
$ |
79,651 |
|
|
$ |
104,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial information for 2008 and the first six months of 2009 has been
revised to include results attributable to the Powder River assets and Chipeta assets. See
Note 1Description of Business and Basis of PresentationPowder River acquisition and
Chipeta acquisition of the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements included under
Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
|
(2) |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense and other income, net for purposes of
reconciling Adjusted EBITDA to net income includes 51% of the respective amounts attributable
to Chipeta Processing LLC. |
Gross margin
We define gross margin as total revenues less cost of product. We changed our definition of gross
margin from the definition used in the prior year. Gross margin has been presented using the
revised definition for all periods presented. We consider gross margin to provide information
useful in assessing our results of operations, our ability to internally fund capital expenditures
and to service or incur additional debt.
ITEMS AFFECTING THE COMPARABILITY OF OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS
Our historical results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented may not be comparable
to future or historic results of operations or cash flows for the reasons described below:
|
|
|
Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Anadarko performs centralized corporate functions for
the Partnership, such as legal, accounting, treasury, cash management, investor relations,
insurance administration and claims processing, risk management, health, safety and
environmental, information technology, human resources, credit, payroll, internal audit,
tax, marketing and midstream administration. We anticipate incurring up to $6.9 million in
general and administrative expenses annually to be charged by Anadarko for these centralized
corporate functions. Prior to our ownership of the Partnership Assets, our historical
consolidated financial statements reflect a management services fee representing the general
and administrative expenses attributable to the Partnership Assets. The $6.9 million in
general and administrative expenses to be charged pursuant to the omnibus agreement is
expected to be greater than amounts allocated to us by Anadarko for the aggregate management
services fees reflected in our historical consolidated financial statements for periods
prior to our ownership of the Partnership Assets. In addition, we currently expect to incur
approximately $6.4 million per year in public company expenses, excluding equity-based
compensation and transaction costs related to the Chipeta acquisition and future
acquisitions. We did not incur public company expenses prior to our initial public offering
in May 2008. |
|
|
|
Prior to May 14, 2008, with respect to our initial assets, and prior to December 19, 2008,
with respect to the Powder River assets, all affiliate transactions were net settled within
our consolidated financial statements and were funded by Anadarkos working capital.
Effective on May 14, 2008, with respect to our initial assets, and effective on |
33
|
|
|
December 19, 2008, with respect to the Powder River assets, all affiliate and third-party
transactions are funded by our working capital. Prior to June 1, 2008 with respect to Chipeta
(the date on which Anadarko initially contributed assets to Chipeta), sales and purchases
related to third-party transactions were received or paid in cash by Anadarko within the
centralized cash management system and were settled with Chipeta through an adjustment to
parent net equity. Subsequent to June 1, 2008, Chipeta cash-settled transactions directly
with third parties and with Anadarko affiliates. This impacts the comparability of our cash
flow statements, working capital analysis and liquidity discussion. |
|
|
|
|
For periods prior to May 14, 2008, with respect to our initial assets, prior to December
19, 2008, with respect to the Powder River assets, and prior to June 1, 2008, with respect
to Chipeta, we incurred interest expense or earned interest income on current intercompany
balances with Anadarko. These intercompany balances were extinguished through non-cash
transactions in connection with the closing of our initial public offering, the Powder River
acquisition and Anadarkos initial contribution of assets to Chipeta; therefore, interest
expense and interest income attributable to these balances is reflected in our historical
consolidated financial statements for the periods ending prior to and including May 14,
2008, with respect to our initial assets, prior to and including June 1, 2008, with respect
to Chipeta, and prior to and including December 19, 2008, with respect to the Powder River
assets. |
|
|
|
|
Concurrent with the closing of our initial public offering, we loaned $260.0 million to
Anadarko in exchange for a 30-year note bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.50%.
For periods including and subsequent to May 14, 2008, interest income attributable to the
note is reflected in our consolidated financial statements so long as the note remains
outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
In connection with the Powder River acquisition in December 2008, we entered into a
five-year, $175.0 million term loan agreement with Anadarko, under which we pay interest at
a fixed rate of 4.00% for the first two years and a floating rate of interest at three-month
LIBOR plus 150 basis points for the final three years. In connection with the Chipeta
acquisition in July 2009, we entered into a three-year, 7.00% fixed rate, $101.5 million
term loan agreement with Anadarko. In October 2009, we borrowed $100.0 million under our new
revolving Credit Facility and used $2.0 million of cash on hand to refinance the $101.5
million three-year term loan with Anadarko and related accrued interest. See Note
14Subsequent Events of the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements included
under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Interest expense on our notes and credit facilities
will be incurred so long as the debt remains outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
Our financial results for historical periods reflect commodity price changes, which, in
turn, impact the financial results derived from our percent-of-proceeds processing
contracts. Effective January 1, 2009, commodity price risk associated with our
percent-of-proceeds processing contracts has been mitigated through our fixed-price
commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko that extend through December 31, 2010, with an
option to extend through 2013. See Note 6Transactions with Affiliates of the notes to
unaudited consolidated financial statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
|
|
|
|
We are generally not subject to federal or state income tax. Federal and state income tax
expense was recorded for periods ending prior to and including May 14, 2008, with respect to
income generated by our initial assets, prior to June 1, 2008, with respect to income
generated by the Chipeta assets, and prior to and including December 19, 2008, with respect
to income generated by the Powder River assets. For periods subsequent to May 14, 2008, with
respect to income generated by our initial assets, subsequent to June 1, 2008, with respect
to the Chipeta assets, and subsequent to December 19, 2008, with respect to income generated
by the Powder River assets, we are no longer subject to federal income tax and are only
subject to Texas margin tax; therefore, income tax expense attributable to Texas margin tax
will continue to be recognized in our consolidated financial statements. We are required to
make payments to Anadarko pursuant to a tax sharing arrangement for our share of Texas
margin tax included in any combined or consolidated returns of Anadarko. |
|
|
|
|
We made cash distributions to our unitholders and our general partner following our
initial public offering in May 2008. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the
Partnership paid cash distributions to its unitholders of approximately $8.6 million,
representing the $0.1582 per unit distribution for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Partnership paid cash distributions to its
unitholders of approximately $51.8 million, representing the $0.31 per unit distribution for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and $0.30 per unit distributions for each of the quarters
ended March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. On |
34
|
|
|
October 20, 2009, the board of directors of the Partnerships general partner declared a cash
distribution to the Partnerships unitholders of $0.32 per unit for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, which equates to approximately $18.3 million per full quarter, or
approximately $73.2 million per full year, based on the number of common, subordinated and
general partner units outstanding as of October 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
We expect to rely upon external financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings
and long-term debt and equity issuances, to fund our acquisitions and expansion capital
expenditures. Historically, we largely relied on internally generated cash flows and capital
contributions from Anadarko to satisfy our capital expenditure requirements. |
|
|
|
|
In connection with the closing of our initial public offering, our general partner
adopted two new compensation plans: the Western Gas Partners, LP 2008 Long-Term Incentive
Plan, or LTIP, and the Amended and Restated Western Gas Holdings, LLC Equity Incentive Plan,
or the Incentive Plan. Phantom unit grants have been made under the LTIP and incentive unit
grants have been made under the Incentive Plan. These grants result in equity-based
compensation expense which is determined, in part, by reference to the fair value of equity
compensation as of the date of grant. For periods ending prior to May 14, 2008, equity-based
compensation expense attributable to the LTIP and Incentive Plan is not reflected in our
historical consolidated financial statements as there were no outstanding equity grants
under either plan. For periods including and subsequent to May 14, 2008, the Partnerships
general and administrative expenses include equity-based compensation costs allocated by
Anadarko to the Partnership for grants made under the LTIP and Incentive Plan as well as
under the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and the Anadarko
Petroleum Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (Anadarkos plans are
referred to collectively as the Anadarko Incentive Plans). Equity-based compensation
expense attributable to grants made under the LTIP will impact our cash flows from operating
activities only to the extent cash payments are made to a participant in lieu of the actual
issuance of common units to the participant upon the lapse of the relevant vesting period.
Equity-based compensation expense attributable to grants made under the Incentive Plan will
impact our cash flow from operating activities only to the extent cash payments are made to
Incentive Plan participants who provided services to us pursuant to the omnibus agreement
and such cash payments do not cause total annual reimbursements made by us to Anadarko
pursuant to the omnibus agreement to exceed the general and administrative expense limit set
forth in that agreement for the periods to which such expense limit applies. Equity-based
compensation granted under the Anadarko Incentive Plans does not impact our cash flow from
operating activities. See equity-based compensation discussion included in Note
6Transactions with Affiliates of the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
included under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and in Note 2 Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies of the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of our
annual report on Form 10-K. |
GENERAL TRENDS AND OUTLOOK
We expect our business to continue to be affected by the following key trends. Our expectations are
based on assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. To the extent our
underlying assumptions about, or interpretations of, available information prove to be incorrect,
our actual results may vary materially from our expectations.
Impact of natural gas prices
The current natural gas price environment has recently resulted in lower drilling activity,
resulting in fewer new well connections throughout areas in which we operate, and may result in
further reductions in drilling activity or temporary suspension of production. We have no control
over this activity. In addition, the recent or further decline in commodity prices could affect
production rates and the level of capital investment by Anadarko and third parties in the
exploration for and development of new natural gas reserves. To the extent opportunities are
available, we continue to connect new wells to our systems to mitigate the impact of natural
production declines in order to maintain throughput on our systems. However, our success in
connecting new wells to our systems is dependent on natural gas producers and shippers.
Benefits from system expansions
We completed significant capital expansion projects during 2008 and 2009 that position us to
capitalize on future drilling activity by Anadarko and third-party producers and shippers. In April
2009, we completed a 250 MMcf/d capacity cryogenic unit at the Chipeta plant in the Uintah Basin in
northeastern Utah. Chipeta provides processing services to Anadarko and third-party production in
the Greater Natural Buttes field. In addition, during 2008, Anadarko completed Phase III of the
Fort
35
Union expansion project by installing a third parallel 106 mile 24 line, increasing the total Fort
Union throughput capacity to 1,300 MMcf/d. During the fourth quarter of 2008, Anadarko completed
train two of the Medicine Bow Plant at the terminus of the Fort Union gathering system, which is
designed for 600 gallons per minute of amine circulation. During the first quarter of 2009,
Anadarko completed train three of the Medicine Bow Plant, which is identical to train two. The
systems gas treating capacity will vary depending upon the CO2 content of the inlet gas. At the
current level of 3.7% CO2, the system is capable of treating and blending over 1 Bcf/d while
satisfying the CO2 specifications of downstream pipelines.
Capital markets
We require periodic access to capital in order to fund acquisitions and expansion projects. Under
the terms of our partnership agreement, we are required to distribute all of our available cash to
our unitholders, which makes us dependent upon raising capital to fund growth projects.
Historically, master limited partnerships have accessed the public debt and equity capital markets
to raise money for new growth projects. Recent market turbulence has either raised the cost of
those public funds or, in some cases, eliminated the availability of these funds to prospective
issuers. If we are unable either to access the public capital markets or find alternative sources
of capital, our growth strategy may be more challenging to execute.
Impact of interest rates
Interest rates have been volatile in recent periods. If interest rates rise, our future financing
costs could increase accordingly. In addition, because our common units are yield-based securities,
rising market interest rates could impact the relative attractiveness of our common units to
investors, which could limit our ability to raise funds, or increase the cost of raising funds in
the capital markets. Though our competitors may face similar circumstances, such an environment
could adversely impact our efforts to expand our operations or make future acquisitions.
Rising operating costs and inflation
The high level of natural gas exploration, development and production activities across the U.S. in
recent years, and the associated construction of required midstream infrastructure, resulted in an
increase in the competition for and cost of personnel and equipment. As a result of the recent
decline in commodity prices, we have and will continue to actively work with our suppliers to
negotiate cost savings on services and equipment to more accurately reflect the current industry
environment. To the extent we are unable to negotiate lower costs, or recover higher costs through
escalation provisions provided for in our contracts, our operating results will be adversely
impacted.
36
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
OPERATING RESULTS
The following table and discussion presents a summary of our results of operations for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
2009(1) |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas |
|
$ |
37,952 |
|
|
$ |
35,132 |
|
|
$ |
114,299 |
|
|
$ |
101,028 |
|
Natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales |
|
|
20,591 |
|
|
|
53,428 |
|
|
|
60,932 |
|
|
|
164,834 |
|
Equity income and other, net |
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
|
7,430 |
|
|
|
13,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
60,996 |
|
|
|
94,582 |
|
|
|
182,661 |
|
|
|
279,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product |
|
|
12,888 |
|
|
|
40,912 |
|
|
|
37,479 |
|
|
|
124,204 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
11,741 |
|
|
|
14,001 |
|
|
|
34,841 |
|
|
|
39,512 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,980 |
|
|
|
4,332 |
|
|
|
15,067 |
|
|
|
9,564 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
5,984 |
|
|
|
5,510 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,216 |
|
|
|
9,380 |
|
|
|
29,642 |
|
|
|
26,890 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
42,701 |
|
|
|
79,609 |
|
|
|
123,013 |
|
|
|
215,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
18,295 |
|
|
|
14,973 |
|
|
|
59,648 |
|
|
|
64,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net affiliates |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
5,977 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
19,406 |
|
|
|
19,760 |
|
|
|
65,654 |
|
|
|
69,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
11,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
19,235 |
|
|
|
21,223 |
|
|
|
65,806 |
|
|
|
57,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
6,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
17,949 |
|
|
$ |
58,065 |
|
|
$ |
51,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (3) |
|
$ |
26,404 |
|
|
$ |
30,488 |
|
|
$ |
81,542 |
|
|
$ |
93,633 |
|
Gross margin (3) |
|
|
48,108 |
|
|
|
53,670 |
|
|
|
145,182 |
|
|
|
154,876 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial information for 2008 and the first six months of 2009 has been
revised to include results attributable to the Powder River assets and Chipeta assets. See
Note 1Description of Business and Basis of PresentationPowder River acquisition and
Chipeta acquisition of the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements included under
Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
|
(2) |
|
Operating expenses include amounts charged by affiliates to the Partnership for
services as well as reimbursement of amounts paid by affiliates to third parties on behalf of
the Partnership. See Note 6Transactions with Affiliates of the notes to unaudited
consolidated financial statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
|
(3) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA and gross margin are defined above within this Item 2 under the
caption How We Evaluate Our Operations, which includes a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to
its most directly comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. |
For purposes of the following discussion, any increases or decreases for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 refer to the comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2009 to the
three months ended September 30, 2008 and any
37
increases or decreases for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 refer to the comparison of
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Summary Financial Results
Total revenues decreased by $33.6 million and $96.4 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. For the three months ended
September 30, 2009, gathering, processing and transportation revenues increased by $2.8 million;
natural gas, NGLs and condensate revenues decreased by $32.8 million and equity income and other
revenues decreased by $3.6 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, gathering,
processing and transportation revenues increased by $13.3 million; natural gas, NGLs and condensate
revenues decreased by $103.9 million and equity income and other revenues decreased by $5.8
million.
Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP decreased by approximately $0.9 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and increased by $6.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is due to a $33.6
million decrease in revenues, a $1.6 million increase in income tax expense and a $3.6 million
decrease in net interest income, partially offset by a $36.9 million decrease in operating expenses
and a $1.1 million decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. The increase
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is due to a $92.0 million decrease in operating
expenses, a $11.4 million decrease in income tax expense and a $1.0 million increase in net
interest income, partially offset by a $96.4 million decrease in revenues and a $1.6 million
increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. The changes in revenues, operating
expenses, interest expense, income taxes and net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
are discussed in more detail below.
Operating Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D (1) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D (1) |
|
|
|
(MMcf/d, except percentages and gross margin per Mcf) |
|
Gathering and transportation throughput (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Third parties |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(27 |
)% |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gathering and transportation throughput |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing throughput (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
Third parties |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total processing throughput |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investment throughput (4) |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total throughput |
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput attributable to noncontrolling
interest owners |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total throughput attributable to
Western Gas Partners, LP |
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the percentage change for the three months ended September 30, 2009
or for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 50% of Newcastle system volumes. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 100% of Chipeta plant volumes. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the Partnerships 14.81% share of Fort Unions gross volumes. |
38
Total throughput, which consists of affiliate, third-party and equity investment volumes, decreased
by 80 MMcf/d for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and increased by 66 MMcf/d for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. Total throughput attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP, which
excludes the noncontrolling interest owners proportionate share of Chipetas throughput, decreased
by 103 MMcf/d for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and remained relatively flat for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Affiliate gathering and transportation throughput decreased by 88 MMcf/d and 72 MMcf/d for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. The decrease for both the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 is
primarily due to throughput decreases at the Pinnacle, Dew, Haley and Hugoton systems primarily due
to natural production declines and changes in contract terms, partially offset by affiliate
throughput increases at the Chipeta plant and the MIGC system. Contract terms for one Pinnacle
customer changed in August 2008 when a producer chose to take its product in-kind and contract
directly with us for gathering services, rather than to sell its production to our affiliate at the
wellhead, resulting in a shift in volumes from affiliate to third-party. Affiliate volume increases
for the MIGC system are primarily due to throughput from contracts entered into by our affiliate
upon expiration of two third-party contracts in December 2008 and January 2009, which enabled an
affiliate of Anadarko to increase its volumes.
Third-party gathering and transportation throughput decreased by 46 MMcf/d and 11 MMcf/d for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. The decrease for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 is
primarily attributable to throughput decreases at the Haley and MIGC systems, partially offset by
third-party throughput increases at the Pinnacle system. The declines experienced on the MIGC
pipeline were primarily due to the expiration of two third-party contracts described above. The
throughput declines on the Haley system were primarily due to natural production declines. The
increase in third-party throughput at the Pinnacle systems is primarily due to changes in contract
terms mentioned above resulting in a shift from affiliate to third-party throughput.
Affiliate processing throughput increased by 45 MMcf/d and 126 MMcf/d for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and third-party
processing throughput remained relatively flat for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
increased by 13 MMcf/d for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Affiliate throughput increased
primarily due to increased throughput at the Chipeta plant from drilling activities by our
affiliate in the Natural Buttes Field.
Equity investment volumes increased by 8 MMcf/d and 10 MMcf/d for the three months ended September
30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, primarily due to
additional throughput from the Powder River area following expansion of the Fort Union system
during the second half of 2008.
39
Natural Gas Gathering, Processing and Transportation Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Gathering,
processing and
transportation of
natural gas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
$ |
33,438 |
|
|
$ |
29,878 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
101,314 |
|
|
$ |
88,217 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Third parties |
|
|
4,514 |
|
|
|
5,254 |
|
|
|
(14 |
)% |
|
|
12,985 |
|
|
|
12,811 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
37,952 |
|
|
$ |
35,132 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
114,299 |
|
|
$ |
101,028 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas revenues increased by $2.8 million
and by $13.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively. Revenues from affiliates increased by $3.6 million and $13.1
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively, primarily due to increased affiliate throughput at the Chipeta plant and at the
MIGC system due to the third-party contract expirations that caused volumes and associated revenues
to shift from third party to affiliate, partially offset by throughput decreases at the Pinnacle,
Dew, Haley and Hugoton systems. Revenues from third parties decreased by $0.7 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to third-party throughput decreases at the Haley
system and a decrease in third-party volumes on the MIGC system attributable to the third-party
contract expirations described above, partially offset by throughput increases at the Pinnacle
system. Revenues from third parties remained relatively flat for the nine months ended September
30, 2009.
Natural Gas, Natural Gas Liquids and Condensate Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and per-unit amounts) |
|
Natural gas sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
$ |
6,659 |
|
|
$ |
18,802 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
$ |
21,973 |
|
|
$ |
56,157 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
Third parties |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
(1) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(74 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,661 |
|
|
$ |
18,802 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
$ |
21,979 |
|
|
$ |
56,180 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas liquids sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
$ |
12,367 |
|
|
$ |
31,445 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
|
$ |
33,990 |
|
|
$ |
94,614 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
Third parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,367 |
|
|
$ |
31,604 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
|
$ |
33,990 |
|
|
|
94,774 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drip condensate sales third parties |
|
$ |
1,563 |
|
|
$ |
3,022 |
|
|
|
(48 |
)% |
|
$ |
4,963 |
|
|
$ |
13,880 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total natural gas, natural gas
liquids and condensate sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
$ |
19,026 |
|
|
$ |
50,247 |
|
|
|
(62 |
)% |
|
$ |
55,963 |
|
|
$ |
150,771 |
|
|
|
(63 |
)% |
Third parties |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
(51 |
)% |
|
|
4,969 |
|
|
|
14,063 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,591 |
|
|
$ |
53,428 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
|
$ |
60,932 |
|
|
$ |
164,834 |
|
|
|
(63 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price per unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
|
$ |
8.95 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
$ |
8.76 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) |
|
$ |
37.99 |
|
|
$ |
82.57 |
|
|
|
(54 |
)% |
|
$ |
38.14 |
|
|
$ |
81.64 |
|
|
|
(53 |
)% |
Drip condensate (per Bbl) |
|
$ |
59.31 |
|
|
$ |
109.02 |
|
|
|
(46 |
)% |
|
$ |
43.33 |
|
|
$ |
104.07 |
|
|
|
(58 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Percent change is not meaningful |
Total natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales decreased by $32.8 million and $103.9
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively. The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2009 consisted of a $19.2
million decrease in NGLs sales, a $12.1 million decrease in natural gas sales and a $1.5 million
decrease in drip condensate sales. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
consisted of a $60.8 million decrease in NGLs sales, a $34.2 million decrease in natural gas sales
and an $8.9 million decrease in drip condensate sales.
40
The decrease in NGLs sales was primarily due to a decrease in the average price for NGLs sold. The
average natural gas and NGLs prices for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 include
gains from commodity price swap agreements. The decrease in the NGLs price per barrel is due to the
decrease in market prices, partially offset by the fixed prices at the Hilight and Newcastle
systems under the commodity price swap agreements. The fixed prices under the swap agreements were
lower than 2008 market prices but higher than 2009 market prices. The volume of NGLs sold decreased
by approximately 63,000 Bbls, or 15%, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and decreased
by approximately 222,000 Bbls, or 19%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due
to the shut-in of a plant at the Hilight system in September 2008 at which butane was purchased,
processed into iso-butane and sold.
The decrease in natural gas sales was primarily due to a decrease in the average price for residue
gas sold. For the nine months ended September, 30, 2009, the decrease in average natural gas prices
was partially offset by an 19% increase in the volume of natural gas sold.
The decrease in drip condensate sales was primarily due to decreased average prices for drip
condensate sold.
Equity Income and Other Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Equity income affiliate |
|
$ |
1,794 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
$ |
5,329 |
|
|
$ |
3,840 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
|
(33 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,295 |
|
|
$ |
4,055 |
|
|
|
(68 |
)% |
Third parties |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
(95 |
)% |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
5,323 |
|
|
|
(85 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity income and other revenues, net |
|
$ |
2,453 |
|
|
$ |
6,022 |
|
|
|
(59 |
)% |
|
$ |
7,430 |
|
|
$ |
13,218 |
|
|
|
(44 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity income and other revenues decreased by $3.6 million and $5.8 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, equity income increased by approximately
$0.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, primarily from the system expansion at Fort Union and
a decrease in that joint ventures interest expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
other affiliate revenues decreased primarily due to changes in gas imbalance positions and related
gas prices. The decrease in other third-party revenues for the three months ended September 30,
2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was primarily due to a decrease in other
third-party revenues due to changes in gas imbalance positions and related gas prices and, in
addition for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due to a $0.9 million indemnity payment
received from a third party during 2008.
41
Cost of Product and Operation and Maintenance Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and per-unit amounts) |
|
Cost of product |
|
$ |
12,888 |
|
|
$ |
40,912 |
|
|
|
(68 |
)% |
|
$ |
37,479 |
|
|
$ |
124,204 |
|
|
|
(70 |
)% |
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
11,741 |
|
|
|
14,001 |
|
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
|
34,841 |
|
|
|
39,512 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of product and operation and
maintenance expenses |
|
$ |
24,629 |
|
|
$ |
54,913 |
|
|
|
(55 |
)% |
|
$ |
72,320 |
|
|
$ |
163,716 |
|
|
|
(56 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product average price per unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
2.32 |
|
|
$ |
6.63 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
$ |
6.88 |
|
|
|
(69 |
)% |
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) |
|
$ |
19.48 |
|
|
$ |
66.47 |
|
|
|
(71 |
)% |
|
$ |
18.16 |
|
|
$ |
60.31 |
|
|
|
(70 |
)% |
Drip condensate (per MMBtu) |
|
$ |
2.91 |
|
|
$ |
8.28 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
$ |
7.99 |
|
|
|
(63 |
)% |
Cost of product expense decreased by $28.0 million and $86.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The decrease for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 includes an approximate $24.8 million decrease in cost of
product expense attributable to the lower cost of natural gas and NGLs we purchase from producers
due to lower market prices and lower volumes, a $2.5 million decrease due to changes in gas
imbalance positions and related gas prices and a $0.7 million decrease from the lower cost of
natural gas to compensate shippers on a thermally equivalent basis for drip condensate retained by
us and sold to third parties, primarily due to lower market prices. The volume of natural gas
purchased from producers decreased 4% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and the volume
of NGLs purchased from producers decreased 15% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in
the volume of NGLs purchased is primarily due to the September 2008 shut-in of a unit that produced iso-butane
from NGLs at the Hilight system. Excluding the impact of the shut-in, the volume of NGLs purchased would have
increased approximately 30%. This increase in the volumes of NGLs purchased and the increase in the volumes of
natural gas purchased are primarily due to the increase in throughput at the Chipeta plant for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 as well as increased NGLs recoveries at the Chipeta plant due to completion
of the cryogenic unit in April 2009.
Cost of product
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $76.2 million attributable to
the lower cost of natural gas and NGLs we purchase from producers, primarily due to lower market
prices and an increase in the volume of natural gas purchased;
decreased by
$6.1 million due to changes in gas
imbalance positions and related gas prices; $3.6 million from the lower cost of natural gas to
compensate shippers on a thermally equivalent basis for drip condensate retained by us and sold to
third parties and by approximately $0.8 million due to a decrease in the excess of actual fuel
costs over contractual fuel recoveries. The volume of natural gas purchased
from producers increased 19% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the volume
of NGLs purchased from producers decreased 19% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The decrease in the volume of NGLs purchased is primarily due to the September 2008 shut-in of
a unit at the Hilight system. Excluding the impact of the shut-in, the volume of NGLs purchased
would have increased approximately 35%. This increase in the volumes of NGLs purchased and the
increase in the volumes of natural gas purchased are primarily due to the increases in throughput
and NGL recoveries at the Chipeta plant described above.
Operation and maintenance expense decreased by $2.3 million and $4.7 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The
decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is primarily due to a $0.9 million decrease
in operating fuel costs attributable to the shut-in of a plant in the Hilight system in September
2008; a $0.3 million decrease in compressor parts and rental expenses primarily due to the
contribution of previously leased compression equipment to the Partnership in November 2008 and
lower rates on equipment rentals as a result of renegotiating with suppliers; and a decrease in
labor and labor-related expenses. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is
primarily due to a $2.6 million decrease in operating fuel costs attributable to the shut-in of a
plant in the Hilight system effective September 2008; a $0.9 million decrease in compressor parts
and rental expenses primarily due to the contribution of previously leased compression equipment to
the Partnership in November 2008; and lower rates on equipment rentals as a result of renegotiating
with suppliers and a decrease in labor and labor-related expenses.
42
Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and gross margin per Mcf) |
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
48,108 |
|
|
$ |
53,670 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
$ |
145,182 |
|
|
$ |
154,876 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Gross margin per Mcf (1) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Gross margin per Mcf attributable to
Western Gas Partners, LP (2) |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as gross margin (total revenues less cost of product) divided by total throughput, including 100% of gross
margin and volumes attributable to Chipeta and the Partnerships 14.81% interest in income and volumes attributable to the
Fort Union. Calculating gross margin per Mcf separately for affiliates and third parties is not meaningful since a significant
portion of throughput is delivered from third parties while the related residue gas and NGLs are sold to an affiliate. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as gross margin (total revenues less cost of product), excluding the noncontrolling interest owners
proportionate share of revenues and cost of product, divided by total throughput attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP.
Calculation includes income and volumes attributable to the Partnerships investment in Fort Union. |
Gross margin decreased by $5.6 million and $9.7 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The decrease in gross margin
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is
primarily due to the decrease in natural gas and NGLs prices and throughput. The impact of the
decrease in market prices on our gross margin was mitigated by our fixed-price contract structure.
Gross margin per Mcf attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP decreased by 2% and 9% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The decrease in gross margin per Mcf is
primarily due to lower processing margins and lower drip condensate margins.
General and Administrative, Depreciation and Other Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
5,980 |
|
|
$ |
4,332 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
$ |
15,067 |
|
|
$ |
9,564 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
Property and other taxes |
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
5,984 |
|
|
|
5,510 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,216 |
|
|
|
9,380 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
29,642 |
|
|
|
26,890 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and
administrative, depreciation
and other expenses |
|
$ |
18,072 |
|
|
$ |
24,696 |
|
|
|
(27 |
)% |
|
$ |
50,693 |
|
|
$ |
51,318 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative, depreciation and other expenses decreased by $6.6 million and $0.6
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively. General and administrative expenses increased by $1.6 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to accounting and legal expenses attributable to the
Chipeta acquisition. General and administrative expenses increased $5.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to incurring expenses attributable to being a publicly
traded partnership for all of the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to approximately
three and a half months during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and to accounting and
legal expenses attributable to the Chipeta acquisition and equity-based compensation expense.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $0.8 million and $2.8 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, due to depreciation on assets placed in service in late 2008 and in 2009, primarily
attributable to the expansion to our Chipeta plant completed in April 2009, our Pinnacle Bethel
treating facility completed in July 2008 and previously leased Hugoton compression equipment
contributed to the Partnership in November 2008. Prior to our acquisition of the Powder River
assets, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, a $9.4 million impairment charge
was recognized related to the shut-in of a plant at the Hilight system.
43
Interest Income, Net Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Interest income on note receivable from Anadarko |
|
$ |
4,225 |
|
|
$ |
4,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,675 |
|
|
$ |
6,478 |
|
|
|
96 |
% |
Interest (expense) on notes payable to Anadarko |
|
|
(3,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
(1) |
|
|
(6,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
(1) |
|
Interest income (expense), net affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,470 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Credit facility commitment fees affiliates |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
4,661 |
|
|
|
(76 |
)% |
|
$ |
5,977 |
|
|
$ |
4,932 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Percent change is not meaningful |
Interest income, net for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, consisted of interest
income on our $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko entered into in connection with our
initial public offering in May 2008, partially offset by interest expense attributable to our
$175.0 million term loan agreement entered into with Anadarko in connection with the Powder River
acquisition, interest expense attributable to our $101.5 million term loan agreement entered into
with Anadarko in connection with the Chipeta acquisition, and commitment fees on our $100.0 million
portion of Anadarkos $1.3 billion credit facility and our $30.0 million working capital facility.
In October 2009, we borrowed $100.0 million under our new $350.0 million three-year revolving
Credit Facility and refinanced the $101.5 million term loan. See Note 14Subsequent Events
Revolving credit facility of the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements included
under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10 Q. Interest income, net for the three months ended September
30, 2008 consisted of interest income on our $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko and
interest earned on affiliate balances, partially offset by commitment fees for our credit
facilities. Interest income, net for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 consisted
of interest income on our $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko, partially offset by
interest charged on affiliate balances and commitment fees on our credit facilities.
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
19,406 |
|
|
$ |
19,760 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
$ |
65,654 |
|
|
$ |
69,137 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
|
|
112 |
% |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
11,289 |
|
|
|
(101 |
)% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense increased by $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
decreased by $11.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Income earned by the
Partnership, a non-taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, including and subsequent to
May 14, 2008, with respect to the initial assets, and including and subsequent to December 19,
2008, with respect to the Powder River assets, was subject only to Texas margin tax while income
earned prior to May 14, 2008, with respect to the initial assets, and prior to December 19, 2008,
with respect to the Powder River assets, was subject to federal and state income tax. Income
attributable to the Chipeta assets was subject to federal and state income tax for periods prior to
June 1, 2008, at which time substantially all of the Chipeta assets were contributed to a
non-taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For 2008 and 2009, the Partnerships
variance from the federal statutory rate is primarily attributable to our U.S. federal income tax
status as a non-taxable entity beginning on May 14, 2008, partially offset by state income tax
expense.
The increase in income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is primarily due
to a net income tax benefit resulting from the impairment loss recorded on an asset at the Hilight
system during the three months ended September 30, 2008, partially offset by Texas margin tax expense
attributable to the initial assets and federal income tax attributable to the Newcastle system. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, income tax expense decreased
primarily due to a change in the applicability of U.S. federal income tax to our income
that occurred in connection with the initial public offering. In addition, for the nine months
ended September 30,
44
2009, our estimated income attributed to Texas relative to our total income
decreased as compared to the prior year, which resulted in an approximately $0.5 million reduction
of previously recognized deferred taxes.
Noncontrolling Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
2,187 |
|
|
$ |
3,274 |
|
|
|
(33 |
)% |
|
$ |
7,741 |
|
|
$ |
6,177 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased $1.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and increased $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Noncontrolling interests represent the aggregate 49% interest in Chipeta held by Anadarko and a
third party. The decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 is primarily due to lower prices on NGLs sales at the Chipeta
plant, offset by higher volumes. The increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is
primarily due to an increase in volumes processed at the Chipeta plant as the refrigeration unit
was placed in service in late 2007 and throughput increased to the plants initial capacity during
the first quarter of 2008. The cryogenic unit was placed in service in April 2009, leading to
further increased volumes and NGLs recoveries during the balance of 2009.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our ability to finance operations, fund maintenance capital expenditures and pay distributions will
largely depend on our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to cover these requirements. Our
ability to generate cash flow is subject to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our
control. Please read Item 1ARisk Factors of our annual report on Form 10-K.
Prior to our initial public offering, our sources of liquidity included cash generated from
operations and funding from Anadarko. Furthermore, we participated in Anadarkos cash management
program, whereby Anadarko, on a periodic basis, swept cash balances residing in our bank accounts.
Thus, our historical consolidated financial statements for periods ending prior to our initial
public offering reflect no significant cash balances. Unlike our transactions with third parties,
which ultimately are settled in cash, our affiliate transactions prior to our acquisition of the
Partnership Assets were settled on a net basis through an adjustment to parent net equity.
Subsequent to our initial public offering, we maintain our own bank accounts and sources of
liquidity. Although we continue to utilize Anadarkos cash management system, our cash accounts are
not subject to cash sweeps by Anadarko.
Our sources of liquidity as of September 30, 2009 include:
|
|
|
approximately $40.8 million of working capital as of September 30, 2009, which we define
as the amount by which current assets exceed current liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
cash generated from operations; |
|
|
|
|
available borrowings of up to $100.0 million under Anadarkos credit facility; |
|
|
|
|
available borrowings under our $30.0 million working capital facility with Anadarko; |
|
|
|
|
interest income from our $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko; and |
|
|
|
|
issuances of additional partnership units. |
In addition, we entered into a $350.0 million three-year revolving Credit Facility in October 2009.
See Note 14Subsequent Events Revolving credit facility of the notes to unaudited consolidated
financial statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. We believe that cash
generated from these sources will be sufficient to satisfy our short-term working capital
requirements and long-term maintenance capital expenditure requirements. The amount of future
distributions to unitholders will depend on earnings, financial conditions, capital requirements
and other factors, and will be determined by the board of directors of our general partner on a
quarterly basis.
45
Working capital
Working capital, defined as the amount by which current assets exceed current liabilities, is an
indication of our liquidity and potential need for short-term funding. Our working capital
requirements are driven by changes in accounts receivable and accounts payable. These changes are
primarily impacted by factors such as credit extended to, and the timing of collections from, our
customers and the level and timing of our spending for maintenance and expansion activity.
Historical cash flow
The following table and discussion presents a summary of our net cash flows from operating
activities, investing activities and financing activities as well as Adjusted EBITDA for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
For periods prior to May 14, 2008, with respect to the initial assets, and prior to December 19,
2008, with respect to the Powder River assets, our net cash from operating activities and capital
contributions from our Parent were used to service our cash requirements, which included the
funding of operating expenses and capital expenditures. Subsequent to May 14, 2008, with respect to
our initial assets, and subsequent to December 19, 2008, with respect to the Powder River assets,
transactions with Anadarko and third parties are cash-settled. Prior to June 1, 2008 with respect
to Chipeta, sales and purchases related to third-party transactions were received or paid in cash
by Anadarko within its centralized cash management system and were settled with Chipeta through an
adjustment to parent net equity. Subsequent to June 1, 2008, Chipeta cash-settled transactions
directly with third parties and with Anadarko affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
21,444 |
|
|
$ |
45,793 |
|
|
|
(53 |
)% |
|
$ |
79,651 |
|
|
$ |
104,715 |
|
|
|
(24 |
)% |
Investing activities |
|
|
(107,615 |
) |
|
|
(31,505 |
) |
|
|
242 |
% |
|
|
(143,215 |
) |
|
|
(337,025 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
)% |
Financing activities |
|
|
100,029 |
|
|
|
10,413 |
|
|
|
861 |
% |
|
|
83,513 |
|
|
|
283,700 |
|
|
|
(71 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
13,858 |
|
|
$ |
24,701 |
|
|
|
(44 |
)% |
|
$ |
19,949 |
|
|
$ |
51,390 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
Adjusted EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
26,404 |
|
|
$ |
30,488 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
$ |
81,542 |
|
|
$ |
93,633 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable
financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, please see above within
this Item 2 under the caption How We Evaluate Our Operations. |
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $24.3 million and
$25.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September
30, 2009, respectively, primarily attributable to changes in working capital, lower throughput and
gross margins, and higher general and administrative expenses as described in Results of
OperationsOverview above. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, these items were
partially offset by lower current income taxes, higher net interest income and lower operations and
maintenance expenses as described in Results of OperationsOverview above.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities increased by $76.1 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and decreased by $193.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 includes the $101.5 million cash consideration paid for the Chipeta
acquisition. Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
includes our $260.0 million loan made to Anadarko in connection with our initial public offering.
In addition, capital expenditures decreased by $22.9 million and $27.4 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Capital
expenditures include costs attributable to the Chipeta assets prior to the Chipeta acquisition and
include the noncontrolling interest owners share of Chipetas capital expenditures. Expansion
capital expenditures decreased by 89%, from $24.1 million during the three months ended September
30, 2008 to $2.8 during the three months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to payment of
capital expenditures for the Chipeta cryogenic unit, expansion of the Bethel facility completed
during 2008 and installation of a compressor station at the Hugoton system during 2008. In
addition, maintenance capital expenditures decreased by 32%, from $5.0 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2008 to $3.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009,
primarily as a result of fewer well connections at the Haley and Pinnacle systems due to reduced
drilling activity. Expansion capital expenditures decreased by
46
50%, from $58.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $29.5 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to paying capital expenditures
during the full nine months ended September 30, 2008 for the Chipeta plant construction compared to
paying the majority of capital expenditures for the cryogenic unit during the first six months of
2009, completion of expansions of the Bethel facility and at the Dew system during 2008
and completion of the NGL pipeline at the tailgate of the Chipeta plant during the second
quarter of 2008. This decrease was partially offset by a 15% increase in maintenance capital
expenditures, from $10.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $12.0 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to a compression overhaul at our
Hugoton System, an upgrade to the control system at the Hilight facility and equipment replacements
at the Bethel facility during 2009, partially offset by fewer well connections at the Haley,
Hugoton and Pinnacle systems due to reduced drilling activity. Investing cash flows included
contributions to Fort Union of $8.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 related
to the system expansion.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $89.6 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and decreased by $200.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Net cash provided by financing activities for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 included $101.5 million in loan proceeds from our term loan agreement with
Anadarko which was entered into in connection with the Chipeta acquisition. Net cash provided by
financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included the receipt of $315.2
million of net proceeds from our initial public offering, partially offset by a $45.2 million
reimbursement to Anadarko of offering proceeds. Financing proceeds for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 included $13.3
million, $36.0 million, $21.5 million and $42.1 million, respectively, of contributions from
noncontrolling interest owners and Parent attributable to the Chipeta plant construction, for which
the associated capital expenditures are included in investing activities above. Most of these
contributions were received by Chipeta prior to our acquisition of a 51% interest in Chipeta. For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, $17.7 million and $51.8 million, respectively,
of cash distributions were paid to our unitholders. Distributions to unitholders totaled $8.6
million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, representing the partial
distribution for the second quarter of 2008 following our May 2008 initial public offering.
Distributions from Chipeta to noncontrolling interest owners and Parent totaled $5.7 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, representing the distribution of all of Chipetas
available cash prior to our acquisition of a 51% interest in Chipeta. Distributions to
noncontrolling interest owners and Parent totaled $19.7 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, representing the one-time distribution to Anadarko of part of the consideration
paid by the third-party owner following the initial formation of Chipeta. Net distributions to
Anadarko were $106.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, representing the net
settlement of intercompany transactions attributable to the Powder River assets and Chipeta assets,
compared to $1.2 million of net distributions to Anadarko during the nine months ended September
30, 2009, representing the net non-cash settlement of intercompany transactions attributable to the
Chipeta assets.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $4.1 million and $12.1 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The decrease for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 is primarily due to a $33.8 million decrease in total
revenues, excluding equity income and a $1.2 million increase in general and administrative
expenses, excluding non-cash equity-based compensation, partially offset by a $28.0 million
decrease in cost of product, a $2.3 million decrease in operation and maintenance expenses and an
approximately $0.8 million decrease in the noncontrolling interest owners share of Adjusted
EBITDA. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is primarily due to a $97.9
million decrease in total revenues, excluding equity income, a $3.6 million increase in general and
administrative expenses, excluding non-cash equity-based compensation, and a $2.0 million increase
in the noncontrolling interest owners share of Adjusted EBITDA, partially offset by a $86.7
million decrease in cost of product, a $4.7 million decrease in operation and maintenance expenses
and an approximately $0.5 million increase in distributions from Fort Union.
Capital requirements
Our business can be capital intensive, requiring significant investment to maintain and improve
existing facilities. We categorize capital expenditures as either:
|
|
|
maintenance capital expenditures, which include those expenditures required to maintain
the existing operating capacity and service capability of our assets, including the
replacement of system components and equipment that have suffered significant wear and tear,
become obsolete or approached the end of their useful lives, those |
47
|
|
|
expenditures necessary to
remain in compliance with regulatory or legal requirements or those expenditures necessary
to complete additional well connections to maintain existing system volumes and related cash
flows; or |
|
|
|
expansion capital expenditures, which include those expenditures incurred in order to
extend the useful lives of our assets, reduce costs, increase revenues or increase
gathering, processing, treating and transmission throughput or capacity from current levels,
including well connections that increase existing system volumes. |
Total capital incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $38.0 million and
$80.3 million, respectively. Capital incurred is presented on an accrual basis. Capital
expenditures in the consolidated statement of cash flows reflect capital expenditures on a cash
basis, when payments are made. Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 were $41.5 million and $68.9 million, respectively. Capital expenditures for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 include $23.6 million attributable to the Chipeta assets prior to
the Chipeta acquisition and include the noncontrolling interest owners share of Chipetas capital
expenditures which were funded by contributions from the noncontrolling interest owners. Expansion
capital expenditures represented approximately 71% and 85% of total capital expenditures for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We estimate our total capital
expenditures, excluding any future acquisitions, to be $55.0 million to $59.0 million and our
maintenance capital expenditures to be approximately 30% of total capital expenditures for the
twelve months ending December 31, 2009. Our future expansion capital expenditures may vary
significantly from period to period based on the investment opportunities available to us, which
are dependent, in part, on the drilling activities of Anadarko and third-party producers. From time
to time, for projects with significant risk or capital exposure, we may secure indemnity provisions
or throughput agreements. We expect to fund future capital expenditures from cash flows generated
from our operations, interest income from our note receivable from Anadarko, borrowings under our
revolving Credit Facility or Anadarkos credit facility, the issuance of additional partnership
units or debt offerings.
Distributions to unitholders
We expect to pay a quarterly distribution of $0.32 per unit per full quarter, which equates to
approximately $18.3 million per full quarter, or approximately $73.2 million per full year, based
on the number of common, subordinated and general partner units outstanding as of October 31, 2009.
Our partnership agreement requires that the Partnership distribute all of its available cash (as
defined in the partnership agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Partnership paid cash distributions to its
unitholders of approximately $51.8 million, representing the $0.31 per unit distribution for the
quarter ended June 20, 2009 and $0.30 per unit distributions for each of the quarters ended March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. On October 20, 2009, the board of directors of the Partnerships
general partner declared a cash distribution to the Partnerships unitholders of $0.32 per unit, or
$18.3 million in aggregate. The cash distribution is payable on November 13, 2009 to unitholders of
record at the close of business on October 30, 2009.
Our borrowing capacity under Anadarkos credit facility
On March 4, 2008, Anadarko entered into a $1.3 billion credit facility under which we are a
co-borrower. This credit facility is available for borrowings and letters of credit and permits us
to utilize up to $100.0 million under the facility for general partnership purposes, including
acquisitions, but only to the extent that sufficient amounts remain unborrowed by Anadarko. At
September 30, 2009, the full $100.0 million was available for borrowing by us. The $1.3 billion
credit facility expires in March 2013.
Interest on borrowings under the credit facility is calculated based on the election by the
borrower of either: (i) a floating rate equal to the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% or
(ii) a periodic fixed rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin, which
was 0.44% at September 30, 2009, and the commitment fees on the facility are based on Anadarkos
senior unsecured long-term debt rating. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, as a co-borrower under
Anadarkos credit facility, we are required to reimburse Anadarko for our allocable portion of
commitment fees (0.11% of our committed and available borrowing capacity, including our outstanding
balances, if any) that Anadarko incurs under its credit facility, or up to $0.1 million annually.
Under Anadarkos credit facilities, we and Anadarko are required to comply with certain covenants,
including a financial covenant that requires Anadarko to maintain a debt-to-capitalization ratio of
60% or less. As of September 30, 2009, we and Anadarko were in compliance with all covenants.
Should we or Anadarko fail to comply with any covenant in Anadarkos credit facilities, we may not
be permitted to borrow thereunder. Anadarko is a guarantor of our borrowings, if any, under the
credit facility. We are not a guarantor of Anadarkos borrowings under the credit facility.
48
Our working capital facility
Concurrent with the closing of our initial public offering, we entered into a two-year, $30.0
million working capital facility with Anadarko as the lender. At September 30, 2009, no borrowings
were outstanding under the working capital facility. The facility is available exclusively to fund
working capital needs. Borrowings under the facility will bear interest at the same rate as would
apply to borrowings under the Anadarko credit facility described above. We pay a commitment fee of
0.11% annually to Anadarko on the unused portion of the working capital facility, or up to $33,000
annually.
We are required to reduce all borrowings under our working capital facility to zero for a period of
at least 15 consecutive days at least once during each of the twelve-month periods prior to the
maturity date of the facility.
Revolving credit facility
On October 29, 2009, we entered into a three-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility with a
group of banks (the Credit Facility). The aggregate initial commitments of the lenders under the
Credit Facility are $350.0 million and are expandable to a maximum of $450.0 million. The Credit
Facility matures on October 29, 2012 and bears interest at LIBOR plus applicable margins ranging
from 2.375% to 3.250%, or an alternate base rate, based upon (i) the greater of the Prime Rate, the
Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, and LIBOR plus 0.5% plus (ii) applicable margins ranging from 1.375%
to 2.250%.
The Credit Facility contains various covenants that limit, among other things, our, and certain of
our subsidiaries, ability to incur indebtedness, grant certain liens, merge, consolidate or allow
any material change in the character of its business, sell all or substantially all of our assets,
make certain transfers, enter into certain affiliate transactions, make distributions or other
payments other than distributions of available cash under certain conditions and use proceeds other
than for partnership purposes. If we obtain two of the following three ratings: BBB- or better by
Standard and Poors, Baa3 or better by Moodys Investors Service or BBB- or better by Fitch Ratings
Ltd. (the date of such ratings being the Investment Grade Rating Date), we will no longer be
required to comply with certain of the foregoing covenants. The Credit Facility also contains
customary events of default, including (i) nonpayment of principal when due or nonpayment of
interest or other amounts within three business days of when due; (ii) bankruptcy or insolvency
with respect to the Borrower or any material subsidiary; or (iii) a change of control. All amounts
due by us under the Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by certain of our wholly owned
subsidiaries. The subsidiary guarantees will automatically terminate on the Investment Grade Rating
Date.
On October 30, 2009, we used $100.0 million of our capacity under the Credit Facility along with
$2.0 million of cash on hand to refinance our $101.5 million, 7.00% fixed-rate, three-year term
loan and settle related accrued interest. We entered into the three-year term loan agreement with
Anadarko in July 2009 to finance a portion of the Chipeta acquisition.
Credit risk
We bear credit risk represented by our exposure to non-payment or non-performance by our customers,
including Anadarko. Generally, non-payment or non-performance results from a customers inability
to satisfy receivables for services rendered or volumes owed pursuant to gas imbalance agreements.
We examine and monitor the creditworthiness of third-party customers and may establish credit
limits for significant third-party customers.
We are dependent upon a single producer, Anadarko, for the majority of our natural gas volumes and
we do not maintain a credit limit with respect to Anadarko. Consequently, we are subject to the
risk of non-payment or late payment by Anadarko for gathering, treating and transmission fees and
for proceeds from the sale of natural gas, NGLs and condensate to Anadarko.
We expect our exposure to concentrated risk of non-payment or non-performance to continue for as
long as we remain substantially dependent on Anadarko for our revenues. Additionally, we are
exposed to credit risk on the note receivable from Anadarko that was issued concurrent with the
closing of our initial public offering. We are also party to an omnibus agreement with Anadarko
under which Anadarko is required to indemnify us for certain environmental claims, losses arising
from rights-of-way claims, failures to obtain required consents or governmental permits and income
taxes with respect to the initial assets. Finally, we entered into commodity price swap agreements
with Anadarko in order to substantially reduce our exposure to commodity price risk attributable to
our percent-of-proceeds contracts for the Hilight system and the Newcastle system and are subject
to performance risk thereunder.
49
If Anadarko becomes unable to perform under the terms of our gathering, processing and
transportation agreements, natural gas and NGL purchase agreements, its note payable to us, the
omnibus agreement, the services and secondment agreement or the commodity price swap agreements,
our ability to make distributions to our unitholders may be adversely impacted.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Our contractual obligations include notes payable to Anadarko and credit facilities, for which
information is provided in Note 10Debt and Note 14Subsequent Events, included in the notes to
unaudited consolidated financial statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q, and a
plant purchase commitment, for which information is provided in Note 12Commitments and
Contingencies, included in the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements included under
Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Our contractual obligations also include an office lease and
asset retirement obligations which have not changed significantly since December 31, 2008 and for
which information is provided under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of OperationsContractual Obligations in Part II, Item 7 of our annual report on Form 10-K, as
filed with the SEC on March 13, 2009.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases. The information
pertaining to operating leases required for this item is provided under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsContractual Obligations in Part II, Item 7 of our
annual report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Commodity Price Risk
We bear a limited degree of commodity price risk with respect to certain of our gathering and
processing contracts. Specifically, pursuant to certain of our contracts, we retain and sell drip
condensate that is recovered during the gathering of natural gas. As part of this arrangement, we
are required to provide a thermally equivalent volume of natural gas or the cash equivalent thereof
to the shipper. Thus, our revenues for this portion of our contractual arrangement are based on the
price received for the drip condensate and our costs for this portion of our contractual
arrangement depend on the price of natural gas. Historically, drip condensate sells at a price
representing a slight discount to the price of NYMEX West Texas Intermediate crude oil.
In addition, certain of our processing services are provided under percent-of-proceeds agreements
in which Anadarko is typically responsible for the marketing of the natural gas and NGLs. Under
these agreements, we receive a specified percentage of the net proceeds from the sale of natural
gas and NGLs. To mitigate our exposure to changes in commodity prices on these processing
agreements, we entered into commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko with fixed commodity
prices that extend through December 31, 2010, with an option to extend through 2013. For additional
information on the commodity price swap agreements, see Note 6Transactions with Affiliates
included in the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements included under Part I, Item 1
of this Form 10-Q.
We consider our exposure to commodity price risk associated with the above-described arrangements
to be minimal given the relatively small amount of our operating income generated by drip
condensate sales and the existence of the commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko. For the
three months ended September 30, 2009, a 10% change in the margin between drip condensate and
natural gas would have resulted in an approximate $293,000, or less than 1%, change in operating
income for the period.
We also bear a limited degree of commodity price risk with respect to settlement of our natural gas
imbalances that arise from differences in gas volumes received into our systems and gas volumes
delivered by us to customers. Natural gas volumes owed to or by us that are subject to monthly cash
settlement are valued according to the terms of the contract as of the balance sheet dates, and
generally reflect market index prices. Other natural gas volumes owed to or by us are valued at our
weighted average cost of natural gas as of the balance sheet dates and are settled in-kind. Our
exposure to the impact of changes in commodity prices on outstanding imbalances depends on the
timing of settlement of the imbalances.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rates during the periods discussed above were low compared to rates over the last 50
years. If interest rates rise, our future financing costs will increase. As of September 30, 2009,
we owed an aggregate of $276.5 million to Anadarko under
50
our five-year term loan we entered into in connection with the Powder River acquisition and the three-year term loan we entered into in
connection with the Chipeta acquisition. In addition, we had $100.0 million of credit available for
borrowing under Anadarkos five-year credit facility in addition to $30.0 million available under
our two-year working capital facility with Anadarko. Our $175.0 million term loan agreement with
Anadarko requires us to pay interest at a fixed rate of 4.0% for the first two years and a floating
rate, three-month LIBOR plus 150 basis points, for the final three years. Our $101.5 million term
loan agreement with Anadarko required us to pay interest at a fixed rate of 7.00%; however, on
October 30, 2009, we used $100.0 million of our capacity under the Credit Facility along with $2.0
million of cash on hand to refinance the $101.5 million term loan with Anadarko and settle related
accrued interest. The Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus an initial margin of 3.00%.
Interest on borrowings under Anadarkos credit facility is calculated based on the election by the
borrower of either: (i) a floating rate equal to the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% or
(ii) a periodic fixed rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin, which was 0.44% at September 30, 2009, is based
on Anadarkos senior unsecured long-term debt rating. Borrowings under our working capital facility
bear interest at the same rate that would apply to borrowings under the Anadarko credit facility.
We may incur additional debt in the future, either under the Credit Facility, our $30.0 million
working capital facility with Anadarko, our $100.0 million borrowing capacity under Anadarkos
existing credit facility or other financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings or debt
issuances.
|
|
|
Item 4T. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered
by this report pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the third
quarter of 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable
assurance that material information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or
submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is appropriately recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We are not a party to any legal proceeding other than legal proceedings arising in the ordinary
course of our business. We are a party to various administrative and regulatory proceedings that
have arisen in the ordinary course of our business. Management believes that there are no such
proceedings for which final disposition could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, cash flows or financial position.
Exhibits are listed below in the Exhibit Index of this report on Form 10-Q.
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Robert G. Gwin
|
|
|
|
Robert G. Gwin |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Western Gas Holdings, LLC
(as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Benjamin M. Fink
|
|
|
|
Benjamin M. Fink |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Western Gas Holdings, LLC
(as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP) |
|
52
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits not incorporated by reference to a prior filing are designated by an asterisk (*) and are
filed herewith; all exhibits not so designated are incorporated herein by reference to a prior
filing as indicated.
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement by and among Western Gas Partners, LP,
Western Gas Holdings, LLC, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas
Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating,
LP, dated as of May 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Western Gas
Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2008, File No. 001-34046). |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Contribution Agreement, dated as of November 11, 2008, by and among Western Gas Resources,
Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, Western Gas
Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 12,
2008, File No. 001-34046). |
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Contribution Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2009, by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc.,
WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, Anadarko Uintah Midstream, LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas
Holdings, LLC, WES GP, Inc., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR
Operating, LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2009, File No. 001-34046). |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October
15, 2007, File No. 333-146700). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP,
dated May 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2008, File No. 001-34046). |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas
Partners, LP, dated as of December 19, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 24, 2008, File No.
001-34046). |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas
Partners, LP, dated as of April 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western
Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 20, 2009, File No. 001-34046). |
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas
Partners, LP dated July 22, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas
Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2009, File No. 001-34046). |
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Western Gas Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.3 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 15,
2007, File No. 333-146700). |
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Western Gas Holdings, LLC, dated
as of May 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Western Gas Partners, LPs
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2008, File No. 001-34046). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Unit Certificate for the Common Units (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Western Gas Partners, LPs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 13, 2008, File No.
001-34046). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Term Loan Agreement due 2012 dated as of July 22, 2009 by and between Anadarko Petroleum
Corporation and Western Gas Partners, LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Western
Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2009, File No. 001-34046). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Omnibus Agreement by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas
Holdings, LLC, and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, dated as of July 22, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
July 23, 2009, File No. 001-34046). |
|
|
|
10.3*+
|
|
Gas Processing Agreement between Chipeta Processing LLC and Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP
dated September 6, 2008. |
|
|
|
10.4*+
|
|
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Chipeta Processing LLC effective
July 23, 2009. |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2009, among Western Gas Partners, LP,
Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as the administrative agent and the lenders party
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2009, File No. 001-34046) |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
+
|
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for certain confidential portions of this exhibit
pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance with Rule
24b-2, these confidential portions have been omitted from this exhibit and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |