Unassociated Document
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
Commission
File Number: 0-16284
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
38-2774613
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
27335
West 11 Mile Road, Southfield, MI 48033
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (248) 357-2866
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
Yes ¨ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-
accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company ¨
|
(Do
not check if smaller reporting
company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No
x
The
number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding at November 1,
2010 was 11,178,577.
FORM
10-Q
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item
1 Financial
Statements
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|
3
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets — As of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009
|
|
4
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine Months Ended September 30,
2010 and 2009
|
|
5
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
6
|
Item
2 Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
22
|
Item
3 Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
36
|
Item
4 Controls and
Procedures
|
|
36
|
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item
1 Legal
Proceedings
|
|
37
|
Item
1A Risk Factors
|
|
37
|
Item
2 Unregistered Sales of
Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
39
|
Item
5 Other
Information
|
|
40
|
Item
6 Exhibits
|
|
40
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
41
|
PART
1 — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT
Outsourcing Services
|
|
$ |
26,197 |
|
|
$ |
25,407 |
|
|
$ |
75,918 |
|
|
$ |
78,258 |
|
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
|
|
|
3,066 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
8,538 |
|
|
|
9,319 |
|
Other
Services
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
7,632 |
|
|
|
8,273 |
|
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
31,682 |
|
|
|
30,601 |
|
|
|
92,088 |
|
|
|
95,850 |
|
Government
Technology Services
|
|
|
14,470 |
|
|
|
19,713 |
|
|
|
44,714 |
|
|
|
60,557 |
|
Total
revenue
|
|
|
46,152 |
|
|
|
50,314 |
|
|
|
136,802 |
|
|
|
156,407 |
|
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT
Outsourcing Services
|
|
|
20,394 |
|
|
|
20,167 |
|
|
|
58,602 |
|
|
|
61,145 |
|
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
6,850 |
|
|
|
7,237 |
|
Other
Services
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
1,911 |
|
|
|
5,819 |
|
|
|
6,101 |
|
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
24,608 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
71,271 |
|
|
|
74,483 |
|
Government
Technology Services
|
|
|
11,221 |
|
|
|
14,525 |
|
|
|
34,707 |
|
|
|
43,841 |
|
Total
cost of revenue
|
|
|
35,829 |
|
|
|
38,525 |
|
|
|
105,978 |
|
|
|
118,324 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
10,323 |
|
|
|
11,789 |
|
|
|
30,824 |
|
|
|
38,083 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
|
|
10,726 |
|
|
|
9,807 |
|
|
|
31,741 |
|
|
|
30,823 |
|
Impairment
charge
|
|
|
9,404 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,404 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Restructuring
charge (credit)
|
|
|
(75
|
) |
|
|
(57
|
) |
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
(756
|
) |
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
(9,732
|
) |
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
(13,008
|
) |
|
|
8,016 |
|
Net
interest expense
|
|
|
(165
|
) |
|
|
(310
|
) |
|
|
(555
|
) |
|
|
(897
|
) |
Foreign
currency transaction loss
|
|
|
(347
|
) |
|
|
(70
|
) |
|
|
(3
|
) |
|
|
(720
|
) |
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(10,244
|
) |
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
(13,566
|
) |
|
|
6,399 |
|
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(1,004
|
) |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
(1,578
|
) |
|
|
2,313 |
|
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(9,240
|
) |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
(11,988
|
) |
|
|
4,086 |
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
(271
|
) |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
(284
|
) |
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(8,388
|
) |
|
$ |
862 |
|
|
$ |
(10,903
|
) |
|
$ |
3,802 |
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(0.86
|
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(1.12
|
) |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
(0.03
|
) |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
(0.03
|
) |
Total
basic earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.78
|
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
(1.02
|
) |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Diluted
earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(0.86
|
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(1.12
|
) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
(0.03
|
) |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
(0.03
|
) |
Total
diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.78
|
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
(1.02
|
) |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Weighted
average number of common shares and common
share equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
10,755 |
|
|
|
10,628 |
|
|
|
10,710 |
|
|
|
10,609 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
10,755 |
|
|
|
10,754 |
|
|
|
10,710 |
|
|
|
10,664 |
|
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
18,984 |
|
|
$ |
14,964 |
|
Accounts
receivable (less allowance of $922 at September 30, 2010 and $1,315 at
December 31, 2009)
|
|
|
37,914 |
|
|
|
42,925 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
7,498 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
Net
current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,506 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
64,396 |
|
|
|
64,049 |
|
Property,
equipment and software, net
|
|
|
5,511 |
|
|
|
6,161 |
|
Goodwill
and other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
36,399 |
|
|
|
47,270 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
3,940 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
Net
long-term assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
111,534 |
|
|
$ |
122,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
16,414 |
|
|
$ |
4,074 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
5,197 |
|
|
|
4,972 |
|
Accrued
payroll and related taxes
|
|
|
8,845 |
|
|
|
7,181 |
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
5,002 |
|
|
|
5,050 |
|
Other
current liabilities
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
3,967 |
|
Current
liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
36,363 |
|
|
|
27,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt, less current portion
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,051 |
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
Total
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
11,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common
stock, $0.01 par value, 45,000,000 shares authorized,11,193,251 and
11,118,309 shares issued and outstanding at September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
81,213 |
|
|
|
79,762 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
(8,177
|
) |
|
|
2,726 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
73,926 |
|
|
|
83,629 |
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
111,534 |
|
|
$ |
122,520 |
|
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(10,903 |
) |
|
$ |
3,802 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
4,696 |
|
Impairment
charge
|
|
|
9,404 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Non-cash
expense related to stock options and issuance of common stock and
restricted common stock
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
1,477 |
|
Gain
on sale of business
|
|
|
(1,033
|
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other
|
|
|
(394
|
) |
|
|
786 |
|
Changes
in current assets and liabilities
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
5,715 |
|
Changes
in long-term assets and liabilities
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
(168
|
) |
(Income)
loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(50
|
) |
|
|
661 |
|
Net
operating cash flow from discontinued operations
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
17,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposition
of business, net of cash disposed
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Purchase
of property, equipment and software
|
|
|
(1,472
|
) |
|
|
(1,209
|
) |
Cash
paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(425
|
) |
|
|
(375
|
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(962
|
) |
|
|
(1,584
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of long-term debt
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other
|
|
|
(204
|
) |
|
|
(27
|
) |
Payments
on long-term debt
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,042
|
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
(16,069
|
) |
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(257
|
) |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,020 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
14,964 |
|
|
|
16,072 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
18,984 |
|
|
$ |
16,505 |
|
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
1 — Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared by TechTeam Global, Inc. (“TechTeam” or the “Company”) in accordance
with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included, and such
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
Note
2 — Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive
income (loss) is defined as net income and all non-ownership changes in
shareholders’ equity. For the Company, comprehensive income (loss) for the
periods presented consists of net income (loss), the foreign currency
translation adjustment and net unrealized gain on derivative instruments. A
summary of comprehensive income (loss) for the periods presented is as
follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(8,388
|
) |
|
$ |
862 |
|
|
$ |
(10,903
|
) |
|
$ |
3,802 |
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss) —
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
(576
|
) |
|
|
1,381 |
|
Unrealized
gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(6,106
|
) |
|
$ |
1,399 |
|
|
$ |
(11,155
|
) |
|
$ |
5,658 |
|
Note
3 — Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic
earnings (loss) per share for common stock is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares excluding unvested restricted shares and shares
held in escrow in connection with the Company’s acquisition of RL Phillips, Inc.
Dilutive earnings (loss) per share for common stock is computed using weighted
average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding. Common
share equivalents consist of stock options, unvested restricted stock issued to
employees and shares held in escrow in connection with the Company’s acquisition
of RL Phillips, Inc. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
common share equivalents (including 1,676,500 stock options) were excluded from
the computation of diluted earnings per common share due to the loss for the
period. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, 1,853,400 and
2,077,400 stock options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per common share because the exercise prices of the options
were higher than the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the
respective period.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
4 — Discontinued Operations
In August
2010, the Board of Directors authorized management to pursue the sale of
TechTeam SQM AB (“SQM”), a staffing business in Sweden. On August 31, 2010, the
Company completed the sale of SQM, which the Company had determined was not core
to its long-term growth strategy. This business unit was included in the Other
Services and IT Outsourcing Services segments. Beginning in the third quarter of
2010, SQM has been accounted for as a discontinued operation in accordance with
ASC 205-20, “Discontinued Operations”. The results of operations for SQM have
been removed from the results of continuing operations in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented. The calculation
of discontinued operations removes certain corporate overhead allocated to the
SQM reporting unit in all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of SQM
have been reclassified and are segregated in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets for all periods presented. Total gross proceeds from the sale were
6,281,574 sek ($850,000 at the disposition date). The Company recognized a net
gain of $1,033,000, which is included in income from discontinued operations in
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The
operating results of SQM classified as discontinued operations are summarized
below:
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
887 |
|
|
$ |
2,035 |
|
|
$ |
5,028 |
|
|
$ |
6,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(181
|
) |
|
$ |
(271
|
) |
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
(284
|
) |
Income
tax provision
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Income
(loss) from operation of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(181
|
) |
|
|
(271
|
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(284
|
) |
Gain
on sale of business, net of tax
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$ |
852 |
|
|
$ |
(271
|
) |
|
$ |
1,085 |
|
|
$ |
(284
|
) |
Note
5 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Impairment
Under ASC
350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,” the Company is required to perform
annual impairment tests of its goodwill at least annually or more frequently if
impairment indicators are present. The Company has elected to test for goodwill
impairment on October 1st each year. In connection with the Company’s plan to
sell its TechTeam Government Solutions reporting unit, the Company determined
that an interim test for impairment was required during the third quarter of
2010. No impairment indicators were present for any of the Company’s other
reporting units.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 5 — Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (continued)
In the
first step of the goodwill impairment test, the Company identifies its reporting
units and determines the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the
assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets,
to these reporting units. Historically, the Company has determined estimated
fair value using a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and a
market-based approach. However, for purposes of the September 30, 2010 valuation
of its government business unit, the Company used $40.5 million for its estimate
of fair value. This estimate is based on the completed sale of TechTeam
Government Solutions, Inc., to Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. for $43.0 million
on October 5, 2010, adjusted for estimated changes in the net tangible book
value of $2.5 million as determined by the Stock Purchase Agreement. See Note 15
– Other Matters for further information regarding the sale. Since the carrying
value of Government Solutions exceeded its estimated fair value, the second step
of the goodwill impairment test was performed.
The
second step of the goodwill impairment calculation requires allocation of the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities
of that reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business
combination. The excess of fair value as determined in step one over the fair
value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied value
of goodwill. The carrying value of goodwill is then compared to the implied
value of goodwill and any excess of carrying value of goodwill over implied
value of goodwill must be recognized as a goodwill impairment. The Company
determined under the second step of the interim impairment test that the fair
value of goodwill was less than the carrying value of its goodwill at its
Government Solutions reporting unit. The Company recorded a $9.4 million
impairment charge in the third quarter of 2010 to reflect the implied fair value
of goodwill for Government Solutions.
In
addition, the Company also reviewed its other intangible assets, primarily
customer relationships, for impairment in accordance with ASC 360 and concluded
that the intangible assets were not impaired at its Government Solutions
reporting unit.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
6 — Restructuring
On March
29, 2010, the Company announced a restructuring plan to reduce certain redundant
costs, eliminate excess capacity and support the Company's strategy to more
tightly focus its business. The restructuring plan was approved by the Company’s
Board of Directors on March 23, 2010. The initial 2010 pre-tax restructuring
charge amounted to $2,747,000, and was primarily related to separation costs for
approximately 30 employees and reductions in excess leased facility capacity
around the world. The Company reversed $118,000 of the initial charge in the
third quarter of 2010 due to a change in the estimated amounts to terminate
facility leases which lowered the expected exit costs. Due to the inherent
uncertainty involved in estimating restructuring expenses, actual amounts paid
for such activities may differ from amounts initially estimated. The total
amount related to the 2010 pre-tax restructuring charge post adjustment was
$2,629,000.
The
following table summarizes the accrued charges related to the 2010 restructuring
plans:
|
|
Accrued
Restructuring
Charges at
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
Adjustments
to Accrued
Restructuring
Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Restructuring
Charges at
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Workforce
reductions
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
2,162 |
|
|
$ |
(2,153
|
) |
|
$ |
9 |
|
Other
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
(298
|
) |
|
|
169 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
2,629 |
|
|
$ |
(2,451
|
) |
|
$ |
178 |
|
The
following table summarizes the 2010 restructuring charges by operating
segment:
|
|
Accrued
Restructuring
Charges at
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
Adjustments
to Accrued
Restructuring
Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Restructuring
Charges at
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT
Outsourcing Services
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
$ |
(667
|
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other
Services
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
(981
|
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Government
Technology Services
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(133
|
) |
|
|
6 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
(1,337
|
) |
|
|
170 |
|
Total
restructuring charges
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
2,629 |
|
|
$ |
(2,451
|
) |
|
$ |
178 |
|
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 6 —
Restructuring (continued)
In 2009,
the Company implemented a restructuring plan to improve global management
consistency. The Company globalized its sales and solution design functions
across all geographies. This created a redundancy of a senior executive in
Europe. The 2009 pre-tax restructuring charge related to this action was
$1,167,000 and was primarily for separation costs for one employee. The total
2009 restructuring charge relates to the selling, general and administrative
expenses line item on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The
following table summarizes the accrued charges related to the 2009 restructuring
plan:
|
|
Accrued
Restructuring
Charges at
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
Adjustments
to Accrued
Restructuring
Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Restructuring
Charges at
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Workforce
reductions
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(162
|
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
During
2008, the Company announced corporate-wide organizational realignment and
restructuring actions to improve operating efficiency, achieve greater global
consistency and drive improved financial performance. The restructuring
plans were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on May 21, 2008 and
December 23, 2008. The 2008 pre-tax restructuring charges amounted to
$5,719,000, and were primarily related to separation costs for approximately 80
employees and reductions in excess leased facility capacity around the
world.
Due to
the inherent uncertainty involved in estimating restructuring expenses, actual
amounts paid for such activities may differ from amounts initially estimated.
Accordingly, during the first nine months of 2009, the Company reversed $756,000
of previously recorded liabilities related to the 2008 restructuring plan. This
reversal resulted from re-negotiating a lease
for a facility in Europe to eliminate the Company’s obligation to pay for leased
space that was vacated and expensed in 2008 which lowered the expected exit
costs.
The
following table summarizes the accrued charges related to the 2008 restructuring
plans:
|
|
Accrued
Restructuring
Charges at
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
Adjustments
to Accrued
Restructuring
Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Restructuring
Charges at
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Other
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(53
|
) |
|
$ |
132 |
|
The
following table summarizes the 2008 restructuring charges by operating
segment:
|
|
Accrued
Restructuring
Charges at
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
Adjustments
to Accrued
Restructuring
Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Restructuring
Charges at
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
Technology Services
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(48
|
) |
|
$ |
132 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(5
|
) |
|
|
— |
|
Total
restructuring charges
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(53
|
) |
|
$ |
132 |
|
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
7 — Property, Equipment and Software
Long-lived
assets are evaluated for impairment when events occur or circumstances indicate
that the remaining estimated useful lives may warrant revision or that the
remaining balances may not be recoverable. When this occurs, an estimate of
undiscounted cash flows is used to determine if the remaining balances are
recoverable. No events or circumstances were noted in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 which would require management to perform the noted
analysis.
Note
8 — Acquisitions
Onvaio
LLC
On
May 30, 2008, TechTeam Global, Inc. completed the acquisition of Onvaio LLC
(“Onvaio”), a California limited liability company. Onvaio is a provider of
technical support outsourcing services for clients globally through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Onvaio Asia Services, Inc., based in Manila,
Philippines. The initial purchase price totaled $4,787,000 and included
acquisition costs of $400,000. In addition to the initial purchase price paid at
closing, an additional $1,500,000 was placed into an escrow account and is
payable in increments of $125,000 on the last day of each fiscal quarter
provided that Onvaio is still providing services to its largest customer in
substantially the same form and content as it provided at closing. As of
September 30, 2010, $1,125,000 had been released from escrow and paid to the
selling shareholders. This additional amount is being recorded as goodwill as it
is earned.
RL
Phillips, Inc.
On
August 31, 2007, TechTeam Global, Inc., through its wholly-owned subsidiary
TechTeam Government Solutions, Inc., completed the acquisition of all the
outstanding common stock of RL Phillips, Inc. (“RL Phillips”) for approximately
$2,150,000. Of the total purchase price, $300,000 was paid in shares of TechTeam
common stock, which was placed into escrow for a period of three years after
closing to reimburse the Company for any claims for indemnity or breach of
representation and warranties. These shares were released in their entirety on
June 23, 2010. Furthermore, $100,000 was held back and was scheduled to be paid
in equal installments on the first and second anniversary of the date of
acquisition. On August 31, 2008, $50,000 was paid to the selling shareholders.
The installment due on August 31, 2009 was held back due to a claim for
indemnity. On May 28, 2010, the final installment of $50,000 was paid to the
selling shareholders.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
9 — Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based payment
awards based on the estimated fair value of the award. Compensation expense is
recognized over the period during which the recipient is required to provide
service in exchange for the award. Stock-based compensation expense recognized
in each period is based on the value of the portion of the share-based award
that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. The Company’s outstanding
stock-based awards consist of stock options and restricted stock.
Stock
Options
The
Company recorded compensation expense totaling $186,000 and $286,000 during the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and compensation
expense totaling $736,000 and $879,000 during the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to outstanding options. At September
30, 2010 and 2009, there was approximately $1,335,000 and $2,248,000,
respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options.
Unrecognized compensation expense at September 30, 2010, is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately two
years.
The
Company records compensation expense for stock options based on the estimated
fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation
model. The Company uses historical data among other factors to estimate the
expected price volatility, the expected option term and the expected forfeiture
rate. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at
the date of grant for the expected term of the option.
The
following assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of options granted
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
Weighted
average volatility
|
|
|
65%
|
|
|
|
61%
|
|
Risk
free interest rate
|
|
|
1.2
– 1.3%
|
|
|
|
1.4%
|
|
Expected
term (in years)
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Restricted
Common Stock
Compensation
expense related to restricted stock under all plans is recorded on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period. The Company recorded compensation
expense of approximately $238,000 and $241,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to outstanding shares of
restricted stock under all plans and compensation expense of approximately
$752,000 and $483,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
The
weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock granted under all
plans during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $6.46 and
$8.61, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted
stock granted under all plans during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 was $6.87 and $5.07, respectively. The fair value of restricted stock
awards granted under all plans was determined based on the closing trading price
of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9 — Stock-Based
Compensation (continued)
At
September 30, 2010 and 2009, there was approximately $2,180,000 and $2,500,000,
respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested
shares of restricted stock. Unrecognized compensation expense at
September 30, 2010, is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of approximately three years.
Note
10 — Income Taxes
At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had an unrecognized tax
benefit of approximately $259,000 and $113,000, respectively. The Company
recognizes accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component
of interest expense and recognizes penalties as a component of selling, general
and administrative expense. During the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, interest and penalties recognized in the financial statements
were not material. The Company had no material accruals for the payment of
interest and penalties at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The
Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions,
the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S.
income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2003.
Major Jurisdiction
|
|
Open Years
|
|
U.S.
Federal income taxes
|
|
2007
through 2009
|
|
U.S.
State income taxes
|
|
2005
through 2009
|
|
Foreign
income taxes
|
|
2003
through 2009
|
|
For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the consolidated effective tax
rate was 9.8% and 11.6%, respectively. The rate for the three months and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 was lower than the statutory rate of 34.0%
primarily due to a $9.4 million impairment charge taken in the third quarter of
2010 for which no tax benefit was recorded. Taking an impairment charge with no
tax benefit has the effect of lowering the effective rate when expressed as a
percent of a pretax loss.
For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the consolidated effective tax
rate was 31.7% and 36.1%, respectively. This rate differs from statutory
levels in the three months ended September 30, 2009, primarily because the
reversal of the restructuring charge was recorded in Belgium where there was no
tax expense for the charge due to the availability of tax loss carry forwards
which offset taxable income. Excluding the reversal of restructuring
charges, the effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009 was 32.9% and 41.0%, respectively. The effective tax rate
excluding the reversal of restructuring charges differs from the statutory tax
rate of 34.0% primarily due to state income taxes, non-deductible expenses and
foreign operating losses for which a tax benefit is not
recorded.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
11 — Segment Reporting
Operating
segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief
operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision-making
group is the Executive Leadership Team, which is comprised of the President and
Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Vice President of
Global Sales, the President of TechTeam Government Solutions, the Vice
Presidents of Client Service Management, Chief Information Officer, General
Counsel and the Vice Presidents of Human Resources. The operating segments are
managed separately because each operating segment represents a strategic
business unit that offers different services.
The
accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in
Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements contained in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Company evaluates segment performance based on segment gross profit. Assets
are not allocated to operating segments, but certain amounts of depreciation and
amortization expense are allocated to operating segments.
Financial
information for the Company’s operating segments is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT
Outsourcing Services
|
|
$ |
26,197 |
|
|
$ |
25,407 |
|
|
$ |
75,918 |
|
|
$ |
78,258 |
|
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
|
|
|
3,066 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
8,538 |
|
|
|
9,319 |
|
Other
Services
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
7,632 |
|
|
|
8,273 |
|
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
31,682 |
|
|
|
30,601 |
|
|
|
92,088 |
|
|
|
95,850 |
|
Government
Technology Services
|
|
|
14,470 |
|
|
|
19,713 |
|
|
|
44,714 |
|
|
|
60,557 |
|
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
46,152 |
|
|
$ |
50,314 |
|
|
$ |
136,802 |
|
|
$ |
156,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT
Outsourcing Services
|
|
$ |
5,803 |
|
|
$ |
5,240 |
|
|
$ |
17,316 |
|
|
$ |
17,113 |
|
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
Other
Services
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
2,172 |
|
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
7,074 |
|
|
|
6,601 |
|
|
|
20,817 |
|
|
|
21,367 |
|
Government
Technology Services
|
|
|
3,249 |
|
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
16,716 |
|
Total
gross profit
|
|
|
10,323 |
|
|
|
11,789 |
|
|
|
30,824 |
|
|
|
38,083 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
|
|
(10,726
|
) |
|
|
(9,807
|
) |
|
|
(31,741
|
) |
|
|
(30,823
|
) |
Impairment
charge
|
|
|
(9,404
|
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(9,404
|
) |
|
|
— |
|
Restructuring
credit (charge)
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(2,687
|
) |
|
|
756 |
|
Net
interest expense
|
|
|
(165
|
) |
|
|
(310
|
) |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
(897
|
) |
Foreign
currency transaction loss
|
|
|
(347
|
) |
|
|
(70
|
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(720
|
) |
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(10,244
|
) |
|
$ |
1,659 |
|
|
$ |
(13,566
|
) |
|
$ |
6,399 |
|
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 11 — Segment
Reporting (continued)
Revenue
from customers, or groups of customers under common control, that comprise 10%
or greater of the Company’s total revenue in any period presented are as
follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Federal Government
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
34.1 |
% |
Ford
Motor Company
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
Total
|
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
47.7 |
% |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
49.1 |
% |
The
Company conducts business under multiple contracts with various entities within
the Ford Motor Company organization and with various agencies and departments of
the U.S. Federal Government. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, 12.4% and 19.9%, respectively, of the Company’s total revenue was derived
from agencies within the U.S. Department of Defense in the aggregate. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, 13.4% and 20.3%, respectively, of
the Company’s total revenue was derived from agencies within the U.S. Department
of Defense in the aggregate.
The
Company attributes revenue to different geographic areas on the basis of the
location that has the contract with the customer, even though the services may
be provided by a different geographic location. Revenue by geographic area is
presented below:
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
32,234 |
|
|
$ |
35,229 |
|
|
$ |
95,479 |
|
|
$ |
111,149 |
|
Europe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belgium
|
|
|
8,326 |
|
|
|
8,193 |
|
|
|
24,415 |
|
|
|
24,382 |
|
Rest
of Europe
|
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
6,892 |
|
|
|
16,908 |
|
|
|
20,876 |
|
Total
Europe
|
|
|
13,918 |
|
|
|
15,085 |
|
|
|
41,323 |
|
|
|
45,258 |
|
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
46,152 |
|
|
$ |
50,314 |
|
|
$ |
136,802 |
|
|
$ |
156,407 |
|
Note
12 — Contingencies
From time
to time the Company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the
ordinary course of its business. None of these matters, individually or in the
aggregate, currently is material to the Company.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
13 — Notes Payable and Line of Credit
Long-Term
Debt Agreement
On
June 1, 2007, the Company entered into a five-year, secured credit
agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan
Chase”), as Administrative Agent and participating lender, whereby the Company
may borrow up to $40,000,000 for the issuance of letters of credit and loans. On
July 3, 2007, LaSalle Bank Midwest, N.A., now known as Bank of America,
N.A. (“Bank of America”), joined as a participating lender under the Credit
Agreement through the assignment of a participation share of $15,000,000, or
37.5%. On June 5, 2008, the Company and the banks amended the Credit
Agreement to permit borrowings up to $55,000,000. Borrowings under the Credit
Agreement are currently secured by substantially all domestic assets of the
Company and 65% of its interests in the majority of its foreign subsidiaries.
The Credit Agreement terminates on May 31, 2012.
The
Credit Agreement contains various financial and non-financial covenants, the
most restrictive of which limit the Company’s ability to incur additional
indebtedness and pay dividends. The financial covenants require that the Company
maintain certain leverage ratios and fixed charge coverage ratios, as defined
therein.
On
October 28, 2008, the Company completed the second amendment to the Credit
Agreement to provide the Company the ability to enter into a stock repurchase
program through 2011 (with an annual limitation of $3.0 million per year) and to
increase the Company’s ability to execute capital lease transactions from $1.0
million to $2.0 million.
On March
26, 2010, the Company further amended the Credit Agreement to reduce the
Company’s borrowing limit from $55,000,000 to $28,000,000. As of the date of
such amendment, Bank of America, N.A. was paid in full and is no longer a
participating lender.
The March
2010 amendment permitted the Company to maintain: (a) a rolling four-quarter
Leverage Ratio as of the fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010
of 3.25 to 1 (up from 3.0 to 1), and 3.0 to 1 for fiscal quarters thereafter;
and (b) a rolling four-quarter Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio as of fiscal quarters
ending March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 of 1.0 to 1.0 (down from 1.25 to 1.0),
and 1.25 to 1.0 for fiscal quarters thereafter.
The March
2010 amendment also modified the definition of “Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA” to
allow the Company to exclude: (a) non-cash goodwill and intangible
impairment charges for fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2009, March 31, 2010
and June 30, 2010; and (b) amounts related to cash restructuring charges for
fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010.
Due to
the goodwill impairment recorded in the third quarter of 2010, the Company was
not in compliance with the debt covenants under the Credit Agreement. As of
September 30, 2010, the $16.4 million outstanding balance under the Credit
Agreement was reclassified to current portion of long-term debt on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. On October 5, 2010, the Company repaid the balance
in full. Please see Note 15 - Other Matters for further
information.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
14 – Fair Value Measurements
Items
Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
On
January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 820, “Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) related to nonfinancial assets and
liabilities on a prospective basis. ASC 820 establishes the authoritative
definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and
expands the required disclosures about fair value measurement. On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 820 related to
financial assets and liabilities as well as other assets and liabilities carried
at fair value on a recurring basis. The valuation techniques required by ASC 820
are based on observable and unobservable inputs using the following
hierarchy:
|
Level
1 —
|
Observable
inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities.
|
|
Level
2 —
|
Inputs
other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active.
|
|
Level
3 —
|
Unobservable
inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own
assumptions.
|
Items
Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The
following table summarizes the basis used to measure certain financial assets
and financial liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance
sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Interest
Rate Swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value as of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
$ |
(125 |
) |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
$ |
(125 |
) |
|
NA
|
|
Fair
Value as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
$ |
(449 |
) |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
$ |
(449 |
) |
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value as of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
$ |
(494 |
) |
|
$ |
(494
|
) |
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
On
June 4, 2007, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with
a notional amount of $30,000,000. Under the swap agreement, the notional amount
will be reduced by $625,000 on a monthly basis and will mature on June 3,
2011. The purpose of the interest rate swap, which is designated as a cash flow
hedge, is to manage interest costs and the risk associated with variable-rate
debt. The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading
purposes. The swap effectively converts a portion of the Company’s variable-rate
debt under the Credit Agreement to a fixed rate. Under this agreement, the
Company receives a floating rate based on LIBOR and pays a fixed rate of 5.55%
on the outstanding notional amount. The fair value of these interest rate
derivatives are based on quoted prices for similar instruments from a commercial
bank and, therefore, the interest rate derivative is considered a level 2 item.
On October 5, 2010 the Company settled the swap agreement in full for a payment
of $101,000. Please see Note 15 - Other Matters for further
information.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements
(continued)
For the
three months ended September 30, 2010, gains recognized in other comprehensive
income (loss) on derivatives were $3,000. For the three months ended September
30, 2009, losses recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) on derivatives
were $49,000. Losses reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) into
interest expense upon settlement amounted to $1,000 and $135,000, for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, losses recognized in other comprehensive
income (loss) on derivatives were $82,000 and $189,000, respectively, and losses
reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense upon
settlement amounted to $325,000 and $610,000, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The liability associated with the
interest rate swap is included in other current liabilities and other long-term
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet in the amounts of $125,000 and $0,
respectively, at September 30, 2010 and $394,000 and $55,000, respectively, at
December 31, 2009.
The
Company sponsors a nonqualified deferred compensation plan which allows certain
management employees to annually elect to defer up to 10% of their compensation,
on a pre-tax basis. The plan is intended to be a “top-hat” plan under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The deferred compensation
obligation related to this plan is adjusted each quarter in accordance with ASC
710, to reflect changes in the fair value of the amount owed to the employee.
The deferred compensation obligation is based on quoted market prices in active
markets and therefore is considered a level 1 item. The deferred compensation
obligation in included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated
balance sheet.
Non-financial
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis
In
addition to its interest rate swap and the deferred compensation plan, the
Company measured restructuring related liabilities (Note 6 - Restructuring) at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These liabilities are not measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. The Company has determined that the fair value
measurements included in these liabilities rely primarily on Company-specific
inputs and the Company’s assumptions about the settlement of liabilities, as
observable inputs are not available. As such, the Company has determined that
these fair value measurements reside within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The restructuring obligations recorded represent the fair value of the payments
expected to be made, and are discounted if the payment are expected to extend
beyond one year.
Under ASC
350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,” the Company is required to perform
annual impairment tests of its goodwill at least annually or more frequently if
impairment indicators are present. The Company has elected to test for goodwill
impairment on October 1st each year. In connection with the Company’s plan to
sell its TechTeam Government Solutions reporting unit, the Company determined
that an interim test for impairment was required during the third quarter of
2010. No impairment indicators were present for any of the Company’s other
reporting units.
In the
first step of the goodwill impairment test, the Company identifies its reporting
units and determines the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the
assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets,
to these reporting units. Historically, the Company has determined estimated
fair value using a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and a
market-based approach. However, for purposes of the September 30, 2010 valuation
of its government business unit, the Company used $40.5 million for its estimate
of fair value. This estimate is based on the completed sale of TechTeam
Government Solutions, Inc., to Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. for $43.0 million
on October 5, 2010, adjusted for estimated changes in the net tangible book
value of $2.5 million as determined by the Stock Purchase Agreement.
See Note 15 – Other Matters for further information regarding the sale. Since
the carrying value of Government Solutions exceeded its estimated fair value,
the second step of the goodwill impairment test was
performed.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements
(continued)
The
second step of the goodwill impairment calculation requires allocation of the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities
of that reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business
combination. The excess of fair value as determined in step 1 over the fair
value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied value
of goodwill. The carrying value of goodwill is then compared to the implied
value of goodwill and any excess of carrying value of goodwill over implied
value of goodwill must be recognized as a goodwill impairment. The Company
determined under the second step of the interim impairment test that the fair
value of goodwill was less than the carrying value of its goodwill at its
Government Solutions reporting unit. The Company recorded a $9.4 million
impairment charge in the third quarter of 2010 to reflect the implied fair value
of goodwill for Government Solutions.
In
addition, the Company also reviewed its other intangible assets, primarily
customer relationships, for impairment in accordance with ASC 360 and concluded
that the intangible assets were not impaired at its Government Solutions
reporting unit.
The
following table summarizes the basis used to measure certain non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in
the balance sheet:
|
|
Fair Value as of September 30, 2010 (In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
31,494 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
31,494 |
|
Restructuring
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
Financial
Instruments Carried at Other Than Fair Values
At
September 30, 2010, the Company’s financial instruments consist of accounts
receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying values of accounts
receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values due to their short
maturity periods. The fair value of the Company’s debt approximates its carrying
value based on the variable nature of the interest rates and current market
rates available to the Company.
Note
15 — Other Matters
Disposition
of TechTeam Government Solutions
On
October 5, 2010, TechTeam, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Jacobs Technology
Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jacobs Engineering completed the sale of 100%
of the outstanding stock in TechTeam Government Solutions, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary and separate reportable segment of TechTeam, for a net cash purchase
price of $43.0 million. The purchase price of $43.0 million is subject to
certain escrows and adjustments in accordance with the terms of the Stock
Purchase Agreement. The purchase was subject to shareholder vote and was
approved on October 4, 2010.
The $43.0
million purchase price consists of approximately $31.6 million of cash received
at closing and approximately $11.4 million of cash that was placed in escrow,
each subject to such adjustments and other conditions set forth in the Stock
Purchase Agreement. The cash escrow payment consists of (a) approximately $8.6
million to secure the payment of any future indemnification claims that may be
made by Jacobs Technology against TechTeam during the 36-month period after the
closing date, and (b) approximately $2.8 million to secure the potential
post-closing Purchase Price adjustment to the extent the net tangible book value
of the assets of Government Solutions at closing exceeds or is less than a
target net tangible book value of approximately $12.2 million.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 15 — Other Matters
(continued)
Revenue
and pre-tax income (loss) for TechTeam Government Solutions, Inc. are as
follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
14,470 |
|
|
$ |
19,713 |
|
|
$ |
44,714 |
|
|
$ |
60,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(9,420
|
) |
|
$ |
1,538 |
|
|
$ |
(9,766
|
) |
|
$ |
5,934 |
|
Beginning
in the fourth quarter of 2010, the historical financial results of TechTeam
Government Solutions, Inc. will be presented as discontinued operations. The
loss on the sale of TechTeam Government Solutions, Inc. is estimated to be $1.6
million, primarily for transaction costs to be incurred in the fourth quarter of
2010 related to the sale of TechTeam Government Solutions, Inc.
Notes
Payable and Line of Credit
On
October 5, 2010, the Company repaid $16.4 million the Credit Agreement with
the net cash proceeds received in the sale of TechTeam Government Solutions. As
of October 5, 2010, no amounts were outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
The $16.4 million was included in the Current portion of long term debt on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2010. All commitments
including future loan issuance, letters of credit and other advances under the
Credit Agreement were terminated at this time. TechTeam Global incurred no
material early termination penalties associated with the foregoing.
The
Credit Agreement permitted borrowings by TechTeam Global of up to
$28.0 million. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement were secured by
substantially all domestic assets of TechTeam Global and 65% of its interests in
the majority of its foreign subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement was to terminate
in accordance with its terms on May 31, 2012.
On
October 5, 2010, in conjunction with the repayment of the Credit Agreement, the
Company settled its interest rate swap agreement in full for $101,000. The
interest rate swap was to mature on June 3, 2011. The liability associated with
the interest rate swap was included in other current liabilities and other
long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet in the amounts of
$125,000 and $0, respectively, at September 30, 2010.
Proposed
Acquisition/Transaction with Stefanini International Holdings Ltd.
On
November 2, 2010, the Company signed a definitive agreement that an affiliate of
Stefanini International Holdings Ltd. (d/b/a Stefanini IT Solutions), a
privately held global provider of onshore and nearshore IT consulting,
integration and development, and outsourcing services, will merge with TechTeam
Global. The transaction will be accomplished through an all-cash
tender offer and second-step merger, for a total value of approximately $93.4
million. The definitive agreement was fully supported by TechTeam Global’s Board
of Directors and was the result of the Board of Directors and management’s
evaluation of various strategic alternatives for the benefit of all
stakeholders. The transactions contemplated by the definitive agreement were
unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies.
Stefanini
International Holdings Ltd., through a U.S. subsidiary, will make an offer to
purchase all outstanding shares of TechTeam Global common stock for $8.35 per
share. The tender offer is scheduled to commence within 10 business days of the
signed definitive agreement and is expected to close during the fourth quarter
of 2010. The tender offer is conditioned on the tender of a majority of the
outstanding shares of TechTeam Global common stock on a fully-diluted basis and
various other conditions, including customary regulatory approvals. The
transaction is not conditioned on receipt of financing. Following completion of
the tender offer, an affiliate of Stefanini International Holdings
Ltd. intends to acquire the remaining outstanding
shares of TechTeam common stock for $8.35 per share through a second-step
merger. Further details can be found in filings with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
tender offer to purchase shares of TechTeam Global common stock referenced in
this correspondence has not yet commenced, and this correspondence is neither an
offer to purchase, nor a solicitation of an offer to sell, any securities. The
tender offer to purchase shares of TechTeam Global common stock will be made
only pursuant to a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO containing an offer to
purchase, forms of letters of transmittal and other documents relating to the
tender offer (the “Tender Offer Statement”), which Platinum Merger Sub, Inc. a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Stefanini International Holdings Ltd, will file with
the SEC and mail to TechTeam Global stockholders. At the time the tender offer
is commenced, TechTeam Global will file a Solicitation / Recommendation
Statement with respect to the tender offer (the “Recommendation Statement”).
Security holders of TechTeam Global are advised to read the Tender Offer
Statement and Recommendation Statement when they become available, because they
will contain important information about the tender offer. Investors and
security holders of TechTeam Global also are advised that they may obtain free
copies of the Tender Offer Statement and other documents filed by Platinum
Merger Sub, Inc. with the SEC (when these documents become available) and the
Recommendation Statement and other documents filed by Stefanini International
Holdings Ltd (when these documents become available) on the SEC’s website at
http://www.sec.gov. In addition, free copies of the Tender Offer Statement and
related materials may be downloaded (when these documents become available) from
TechTeam Global’s website at: http://www.techteam.com/investors/sec-filings; and
free copies of the Recommendation Statement and related materials may be
obtained (when these documents become available) from TechTeam Global by written
request to: TechTeam Global, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 27335 West 11 Mile
Road, Southfield, Michigan 48033.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 2, contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements represent
our expectations or beliefs concerning future events, including projections of
revenue, gross margin, expenses, earnings or losses from operations, or other
financial items; estimates of synergies; sufficiency of cash flows for future
liquidity and capital resource needs; our plans, strategies, and objectives of
management for future operations; developments or performance relating to our
services; and future economic conditions or performance. We caution that
although forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs and
reasonable judgment based upon current information, these statements are
qualified by important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements, because of risks,
uncertainties, and factors including, but not limited to, the recent sale of
Government Solutions, the continuing effects of the U.S. recession and global
credit environment, other changes in general economic and industry conditions,
the award or loss of significant client assignments, timing of contracts,
recruiting and new business solicitation efforts, currency fluctuations, and
other factors affecting the financial health of our clients. These and other
risks are described in the Company’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K and
subsequent reports filed with or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission. The forward-looking statements included in this report are based on
information available to the Company on the date hereof, and the Company assumes
no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.
ITEM
2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS (“MD&A”)
Overview
TechTeam
Global, Inc. is a leading provider of IT outsourcing and business process
outsourcing services to large and medium businesses. The Company's primary
services include service desk, technical support, desk-side support, security
administration, infrastructure management and related professional services.
TechTeam also provides a number of specialized, value-added services in specific
vertical markets. Through the end of the third quarter of 2010, our business
consisted of two main components — our Commercial business and our Government
business. Together, our IT Outsourcing Services segment, IT Consulting and
Systems Integration segment and Other Services segment comprise our Commercial
business. Until October 5, 2010, our Government Technology Services segment
comprised our Government business.
Over the
past two years, the TechTeam Board of Directors has actively explored the
Company’s strategic alternatives. During the evaluation process, the
Board of Directors concluded that the Company consisted of two substantially
unrelated, relatively independent and sub-scale businesses, the Commercial
business and the Government business, which did not have significant synergies
between them and that both required significant investment to succeed, grow and
thrive. The Board concluded that the Company did not have the financial
flexibility or capital resources to continue to adequately invest in both
business segments and determined to engage in a process to explore alternatives
to sell one or both businesses.
As the
result of the above process, TechTeam Global, Inc. completed the sale of the
Government business on October 5, 2010. The transaction was subject to certain
escrows and adjustments as set forth in the definitive stock purchase agreement
dated June 3, 2010 and as amended on September 14, 2010. The Company
used a portion of the net cash proceeds from the transaction to immediately pay
off its debt under its existing credit facility. For more information on the
sale, see Note 15.
The
following consolidated financial data illustrates, on a pro forma basis, the
effects of the sale of the Government business for the periods
presented. The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet data
gives effect to the sale and the payment in full of the credit facility
as if it occurred on September 30, 2010. The
unaudited pro forma income statement data gives effect to the sale as if it
occurred on January 1 for each period presented.1
1 The unaudited pro forma
data has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the
Company’s historical consolidated financial statements, including the notes
thereto, in the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the Company’s quarterly report filed on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010. The unaudited pro forma
consolidated financial data are not necessarily indicative of the financial
position or results of operation that would have been achieved had the
Government business been sold on the dates indicated, or that may be expected to
occur in the future as a result of the sale. This abbreviated pro
forma information presented below has been prepared in a manner consistent with
the pro forma presentation set forth in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
dated October 5, 2010.
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30, 2010
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
92,088 |
|
|
$ |
95,850 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
20,817 |
|
|
|
21,367 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
21,959 |
|
|
|
20,814 |
|
Operating
income (loss) before restructuring charge
|
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
|
|
553 |
|
Restructuring
charge (credit), net
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,661 |
) |
|
|
1,309 |
|
Net
interest expense and foreign currency loss
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,800 |
) |
|
|
465 |
|
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(2,485 |
) |
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
$ |
63,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
assets
|
|
$ |
24,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
$ |
13,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
$ |
72,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
For
reference, the financial results in the above table include a number of special
items, such as professional fee expenses. Notably, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, the above includes $3.8 million of professional
fees primarily related to the sale of the Government Solutions
business.
Contemporaneously
with the sale process of the Government business, the Board continued its
evaluation of the strategic alternatives for the Company’s remaining Commercial
business. On November 2, 2010, the Company announced that it had signed a
definitive agreement pursuant to which an affiliate of Stefanini International
Holdings Ltd. (dba Stefanini IT Solutions), a privately held global provider of
onshore and nearshore IT consulting, integration and development, and
outsourcing services, will merge with the Company.
Specifically,
the transaction will be accomplished through an all-cash tender offer and
second-step merger, for a total value of approximately $93.4 million. Stefanini
International Holdings Ltd., through a U.S. subsidiary, will make an offer to
purchase all outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock for $8.35 per
share. The tender offer price represents a 24.0% premium to the Company’s
average closing stock price over the last three-month period ended November 1,
2010 and a 16.8% premium over the closing price of the Company’s common stock on
November 1, 2010. The tender offer is currently expected to close during the
fourth quarter of 2010. For more information regarding this matter, please see
the Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2010 regarding this
transaction.
The
following discussion of the Company’s financial results from third quarter 2010
reflect: (a) a stable financial performance of the Commercial business; (b) the
weakened financial performance of the Government business; (c) a goodwill
impairment of the Government business in light of the weakened performance of
the Government business as reflected in the lower purchase price for the
business; (d) the significant expenses incurred by the Company in the sale
process; and (e) the sale of TechTeam SQM, which has been accounted for as a
discontinued operation, and therefore all results of operations for SQM have
been removed from continuing operations in accordance with ASC 205-20,
“Discontinued Operations” as of the beginning of the third quarter 2010 for all
periods presented.
The
tender offer to purchase shares of TechTeam Global common stock referenced in
this correspondence has not yet commenced, and this correspondence is neither an
offer to purchase, nor a solicitation of an offer to sell, any securities. The
tender offer to purchase shares of TechTeam Global common stock will be made
only pursuant to a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO containing an offer to
purchase, forms of letters of transmittal and other documents relating to the
tender offer (the “Tender Offer Statement”), which Platinum Merger Sub, Inc. a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Stefanini International Holdings Ltd, will file with
the SEC and mail to TechTeam Global stockholders. At the time the tender offer
is commenced, TechTeam Global will file a Solicitation / Recommendation
Statement with respect to the tender offer (the “Recommendation Statement”).
Security holders of TechTeam Global are advised to read the Tender Offer
Statement and Recommendation Statement when they become available, because they
will contain important information about the tender offer. Investors and
security holders of TechTeam Global also are advised that they may obtain free
copies of the Tender Offer Statement and other documents filed by Platinum
Merger Sub, Inc. with the SEC (when these documents become available) and the
Recommendation Statement and other documents filed by Stefanini International
Holdings Ltd (when these documents become available) on the SEC’s website at
http://www.sec.gov. In addition, free copies of the Tender Offer Statement and
related materials may be downloaded (when these documents become available) from
TechTeam Global’s website at: http://www.techteam.com/investors/sec-filings; and
free copies of the Recommendation Statement and related materials may be
obtained (when these documents become available) from TechTeam Global by written
request to: TechTeam Global, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 27335 West 11 Mile
Road, Southfield, Michigan 48033.
Results
of Operations
Quarter
Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to September 30, 2009
Revenue
|
|
Quarter Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT
Outsourcing Services
|
|
$ |
26,197 |
|
|
$ |
25,407 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
|
|
|
3,066 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
% |
Other
Services
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
(218
|
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
)% |
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
31,682 |
|
|
|
30,601 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Government
Technology Services
|
|
|
14,470 |
|
|
|
19,713 |
|
|
|
(5,243
|
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
)% |
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
46,152 |
|
|
$ |
50,314 |
|
|
$ |
(4,162
|
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
)% |
Total
Company revenue decreased $4.2 million, or 8.3%, to $46.2 million in the third
quarter of 2010 from $50.3 million in the third quarter of 2009. The revenue
decrease was driven primarily by the conclusion of customer contracts in
Government Technology Services segments and an approximate $1.2 million negative
impact of exchange rates on foreign revenue. This decrease was partially offset
by new customer contracts and expansion with existing customers in the Americas
and Europe. The foreign currency impact was calculated as if revenue generated
in foreign currency was translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange
rates in effect during the third quarter of 2009. We are unable to predict the
effect fluctuations in international currencies will have on revenue for the
remainder of 2010, but given the uncertain market environment and the effect on
the U.S. dollar, there could be significant revenue volatility.
IT
Outsourcing Services
Revenue
from IT Outsourcing Services increased $790,000, or 3.1%, to $26.2 million
in the third quarter of 2010, from $25.4 million in the third quarter of 2009.
The revenue increase was due to new customers and expansion with existing
customers in Americas and Europe. The revenue increase was offset by the
conclusion of customer contracts in Europe and the Americas, lower revenue from
Ford and a negative impact of exchange rates on foreign currency revenue. The
negative foreign currency impact approximated $1.0 million and was calculated as
if IT Outsourcing revenue in foreign currency was translated into U.S. dollars
at the average exchange rates in effect during the third quarter of
2009.
IT
Outsourcing Services revenue generated from Ford globally decreased $1.6
million, or 25.0%, to $4.7 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared to
$6.3 million in 2009. Revenue from Ford declined 4.1% in the Americas and 58.3%
in Europe as a result of a decline in seats supported from a reduction in Ford’s
workforce, the lower price in the contract renewal, the separation of Jaguar
Land Rover from the Ford SPOC contract and the separation of Volvo Car
Corporation from the global Ford IT programs, including the November 2009 SPOC
contract. Please refer to our discussion of Ford in the “Significant Customers”
section of MD&A.
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
Revenue
from IT Consulting and Systems Integration increased $509,000, or 19.9%, to $3.1
million in the third quarter of 2010, from $2.6 million in 2009. Revenue
increased due to an increase in project based work in the Americas with the
Company’s hospitality business.
Government
Technology Services
Revenue
from Government Technology Services decreased $5.2 million, or 26.6%, to
$14.5 million in the third quarter of 2010, from $19.7 million in
2009, primarily due to the conclusion of the Company’s ANG contract on September
30, 2009. The work performed under the ANG contract was in-sourced to be
performed by the U.S. Federal Government employees. The Company continues to
provide service to ANG as a subcontractor to Harris Corporation who was awarded
the work under the expiring contract that was not in-sourced and added some
other positions. Accordingly, the new contract will produce significantly less
revenue and gross margin than the expiring contract. On October 5, 2010 the
Company completed the sale of its TechTeam Government Solutions subsidiary.
Please refer to Note 15 and our discussion of the U.S. Federal Government in the
“Significant Customers” section of MD&A.
Gross
Profit and Gross Margin
|
|
Quarter
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Gross
Margin
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Gross
Margin
%
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT
Outsourcing Services
|
|
$ |
5,803 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
$ |
5,240 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Other
Services
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
(115
|
) |
|
|
(15.8 |
)% |
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
7,074 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
6,601 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
Government
Technology Services
|
|
|
3,249 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
(1,939
|
) |
|
|
(37.4 |
)% |
Total
gross profit
|
|
$ |
10,323 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
$ |
11,789 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,466
|
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
)% |
Gross
profit decreased $1.5 million, or 12.4%, to $10.3 million in the third quarter
of 2010 from $11.8 million in the third quarter of 2009. Gross margin decreased
to 22.4% for third quarter 2010 from 23.4% for third quarter 2009. The decrease
in gross profit and gross margin was primarily due to the loss of higher margin
government business. This decrease was partially offset by improved operating
efficiencies, the successful execution of the restructuring action announced and
completed in the first quarter of 2010 and expansion with existing customers in
the Company’s Commercial segment.
IT
Outsourcing Services
Gross
profit from IT Outsourcing Services increased 10.7% to $5.8 million in the third
quarter of 2010, from $5.2 million in 2009, and gross margin increased to
22.2% from 20.6%. The increase in gross profit and gross margin was due to
improved operating efficiencies, the successful execution of restructurings
announced and completed in first quarter of 2010 and expansion with existing
customers.
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
Gross
profit from IT Consulting and Systems Integration increased 3.9% to $660,000 in
the third quarter of 2010 from $635,000 in 2009, and gross margin decreased to
21.5% from 24.8% in 2009. Gross profit increased mainly due to more project
based work in the Company’s hospitality business. Gross margin decreased due to
less project based work in the Americas and Europe.
Government
Technology Services
Gross
profit from our Government Technology Services segment decreased 37.4% to
$3.2 million in the third quarter of 2010 from $5.2 million in 2009. The
decrease in gross profit was mainly due to lower revenue, primarily from the
conclusion of the Company’s ANG contract on September 30, 2009. Gross margin
also decreased during the third quarter of 2010 to 22.5% from 26.3% in 2009. The
gross margin decrease was due to the loss of higher margin government business.
On October 5, 2010, the Company completed the sale of its TechTeam Government
Solutions subsidiary. Please refer to Note 15 and our discussion of the U.S.
Federal Government in the “Significant Customers” section of
MD&A.
Geographic
Market Discussion
|
|
Quarter Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$ |
17,764 |
|
|
$ |
15,516 |
|
|
$ |
2,248 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
Europe
|
|
|
13,918 |
|
|
|
15,085 |
|
|
|
(1,167
|
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
)% |
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
31,682 |
|
|
|
30,601 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Government
|
|
|
14,470 |
|
|
|
19,713 |
|
|
|
(5,243
|
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
)% |
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
46,152 |
|
|
$ |
50,314 |
|
|
$ |
(4,162
|
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
26.1 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Gross Margin
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
Revenue
generated in the Americas increased $2.2 million, or 14.5%, to $17.8 million in
the third quarter of 2010, from $15.5 million in 2009. Revenue generated
across all segments experienced an increase due to new customers and expansion
with existing customers. This increase was partially offset by a decrease from a
decline in revenue earned from Ford. Gross margin from the Americas decreased to
19.6% for the third quarter of 2010 from 20.0% in 2009 mainly due to a decrease
in gross margin in the IT Consulting and Systems Integration segment due to a
decrease in project based work with higher margin accounts.
Europe
Revenue
generated in Europe decreased $1.2 million, or 7.7%, to $13.9 million in
the third quarter of 2010 from $15.1 million in 2009, due to the conclusion of
customer contracts in the IT Outsourcing segment and a negative impact of an
approximate $1.2 million from exchange rates on revenue. This decrease was
partially offset by an increase in revenue from expansion with existing
customers. The foreign currency impact was calculated as if revenue in Europe in
third quarter of 2010 were translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange
rates in effect during the third quarter of 2009. Despite a decrease in revenue,
gross margin from Europe increased to 26.1% in the third quarter of 2010, from
23.0% in 2009, primarily due to improved operating efficiencies and the
realization of restructuring actions taken in 2010.
Operating
Expenses and Other
|
|
Quarter Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Operating
Expenses and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
|
$ |
10,726 |
|
|
$ |
9,807 |
|
|
$ |
919 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
Restructuring
credit
|
|
$ |
(75
|
) |
|
$ |
(57
|
) |
|
$ |
(18
|
) |
|
|
31.6 |
% |
Net
interest expense
|
|
$ |
(165
|
) |
|
$ |
(310
|
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
(46.8 |
)% |
Foreign
currency transaction (loss)
|
|
$ |
(347
|
) |
|
$ |
(70
|
) |
|
$ |
(277
|
) |
|
NM
|
% |
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$ |
(1,004
|
) |
|
$ |
526 |
|
|
$ |
(1,530
|
) |
|
NM
|
% |
Selling,
general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expense increased 9.4% to $10.7 million
for the third quarter of 2010 from $9.8 million in 2009. The increase was mainly
due to an increase of $1.3 million of professional fees related to the sale of
the Company’s TechTeam Government Solutions subsidiary. This increase was
partially offset by a reduction in amortization expense in 2010 from the
write-down of certain intangible assets in 2009 and the realization of the
restructuring actions taken in 2009 and 2010. SG&A expense as a percent of
revenue increased to 23.2% in the third quarter of 2010, from 19.5% in
2009.
On March
29, 2010, the Company announced a restructuring plan to enhance the
effectiveness of the Commercial businesses global management team and reduce
expenses in line with current business conditions. The restructuring plan was
approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on March 23, 2010. Due to the
inherent uncertainty involved in estimating restructuring expenses, actual
amounts paid for such activities may differ from amounts initially estimated.
Accordingly, previously recorded restructuring related reserves of $75,000 were
reversed in the third quarter of 2010 primarily from the Company favorably
amending lease facilities in order to eliminate its obligation to pay for leased
space that was vacated and expensed as part of the 2010 and 2008 restructuring
actions.
Net
interest expense was $165,000 in the third quarter of 2010, compared to $310,000
in 2009, a result of lower average outstanding long-term debt, partially offset
by lower interest income from lower average invested cash equivalents and lower
interest rates.
For the
three months ended September 30, 2010, the consolidated effective tax rate was
9.8%. The rate for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was lower than
the statutory rate of 34.0% primarily due to a $9.4 million impairment charge
taken in the third quarter of 2010 for which no tax benefit was recorded. Taking
an impairment charge with no tax benefit has the effect of lowering the
effective rate when expressed as a percent of a pretax loss.
For the
three months ended September 30, 2009, the consolidated effective tax rate was
31.7%. This rate differs from statutory levels primarily because the reversal of
the restructuring charge recorded in Belgium where there was no tax expense for
the charge due to the availability of tax loss carry forwards which offset
taxable income. The effective tax rate excluding the reversal of
restructuring charges was 32.9% which differs from the statutory tax rate of
34.0% primarily due to state income taxes, non-deductible expenses and foreign
operating losses for which a tax benefit is not recorded.
Results
of Operations
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to September 30, 2009
Revenue
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT
Outsourcing Services
|
|
$ |
75,918 |
|
|
$ |
78,258 |
|
|
$ |
(2,340
|
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
|
|
|
8,538 |
|
|
|
9,319 |
|
|
|
(781
|
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
)% |
Other
Services
|
|
|
7,632 |
|
|
|
8,273 |
|
|
|
(641
|
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
)% |
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
92,088 |
|
|
|
95,850 |
|
|
|
(3,762
|
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
)% |
Government
Technology Services
|
|
|
44,714 |
|
|
|
60,557 |
|
|
|
(15,843
|
) |
|
|
(26.2 |
)% |
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
136,802 |
|
|
$ |
156,407 |
|
|
$ |
(19,605
|
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
)% |
Total
Company revenue decreased $19.6 million, or 12.5%, to $136.8 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $156.4 million during the same period
in 2009. The revenue decrease was across all segments and was driven primarily
by the conclusion of customer contracts in the IT Outsourcing Services and
Government Technology Services segments, a decrease in project based work due to
the difficult economic environment and an approximate $730,000 negative impact
of exchange rates on foreign revenue. This decrease was partially offset by
expansion with existing customer and new contracts in the Americas and Europe.
The foreign currency impact was calculated as if revenue generated in foreign
currency was translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates in
effect during the first nine months of 2009. We are unable to predict the effect
fluctuations in international currencies will have on revenue for the remainder
of 2010, but given the uncertain market environment and the effect on the U.S.
dollar, there could be noteworthy revenue volatility.
IT
Outsourcing Services
Revenue
from IT Outsourcing Services decreased $2.3 million, or 3.0%, to
$75.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $78.3
million during the same period of 2009. The revenue decrease was primarily a
result of the conclusion of customer contracts in Europe and the Americas, lower
revenue from Ford and an approximate $600,000 negative impact of exchange rates
on foreign revenue. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in revenue
in the Americas and Europe from new customer contract and expansion with
existing customers. The foreign currency impact was calculated as if IT
Outsourcing Services revenue in Europe was translated into U.S. dollars at the
average exchange rates in effect during the nine months of 2009.
IT
Outsourcing Services revenue generated from Ford globally decreased $8.1
million, or 38.2%, to $13.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to $21.1 million in 2009. Revenue from Ford declined 18.8% in the
Americas and 66.3% in Europe as a result of a decline in seats supported from a
reduction in Ford’s workforce, the lower price in the contract renewal, the
separation of Jaguar Land Rover from the Ford SPOC contract and the separation
of Volvo Car Corporation from the global Ford IT programs, including the
November 2009 SPOC contract. Please refer to our discussion of Ford in the
“Significant Customers” section of MD&A.
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
Revenue
from IT Consulting and Systems Integration decreased $781,000, or 8.4%, to $8.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $9.3 million
during the same period in 2009. Revenue decreased in the Americas primarily from
a decrease in project based work in certain systems implementation and training
projects.
Government
Technology Services
Revenue
from Government Technology Services decreased $15.8 million, or 26.2%, to
$44.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from
$60.6 million for the same period in 2009, primarily due to the conclusion
of the Company’s ANG contract on September 30, 2009. The work performed under
the ANG contract was in-sourced to be performed by the U.S. Federal Government
employees. The Company continues to provide service to ANG as a subcontractor to
Harris Corporation who was awarded the work under the expiring contract that was
not in-sourced and added some other positions. Accordingly, the new contract
will produce significantly less revenue and gross margin than the expiring
contract. On October 5, 2010, the Company completed the sale of its TechTeam
Government Solutions subsidiary. Please refer to Note 15 and our discussion of
the U.S. Federal Government in the “Significant Customers” section of
MD&A.
Gross
Profit and Gross Margin
|
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Gross
Margin
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Gross
Margin
%
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT
Outsourcing Services
|
|
$ |
17,316 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
$ |
17,113 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
(394
|
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
)% |
Other
Services
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
(359
|
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
)% |
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
20,817 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
21,367 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
(550
|
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
Government
Technology Services
|
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
16,716 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
(6,709
|
) |
|
|
(40.1 |
)% |
Total
gross profit
|
|
$ |
30,824 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
$ |
38,083 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
$ |
(7,259
|
) |
|
|
(19.1 |
)% |
Gross
profit decreased $7.3 million, or 19.1%, to $30.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 from $38.1 million during the same period of 2009.
Gross margin decreased to 22.5% for nine months ended September 30, 2010 from
24.3% for the same period of 2009. The decrease in gross profit and gross margin
was primarily due to the loss of higher margin government
business.
IT
Outsourcing Services
Gross
profit from IT Outsourcing Services increased 1.2% to $17.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, from $17.1 million in 2009, and gross
margin increased to 22.8% from 21.9%. The increase in gross profit and gross
margin was primarily due to improved operational efficiencies and from the
successful execution of restructuring action announced and completed in the
first quarter of 2010.
IT
Consulting and Systems Integration
Gross
profit from IT Consulting and Systems Integration decreased 18.9% to $1.7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $2.1 million in 2009,
and gross margin decreased to 19.8% from 22.3% in 2009. Gross profit and gross
margin decreased mainly due to less project based work with higher margin
accounts in the Company’s hospitality business and less project based work
throughout the Company due to the difficult economic environment.
Government
Technology Services
Gross
profit from our Government Technology Services segment decreased 40.1% to
$10.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $16.7
million in 2009. The decrease in gross profit was mainly due to lower revenue,
primarily from the conclusion of the Company’s ANG contract on September 30,
2009. Gross margin also decreased during the nine months ended September 30,
2010 to 22.4% from 27.6% in 2009. The gross margin decrease was also primarily
due to the loss of higher margin government business. On October 5, 2010, the
Company completed the sale of its TechTeam Government Solutions subsidiary.
Please refer to Note 15 and our discussion of the U.S. Federal Government in the
“Significant Customers” section of MD&A.
Geographic
Market Discussion
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$ |
50,765 |
|
|
$ |
50,592 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Europe
|
|
|
41,323 |
|
|
|
45,258 |
|
|
|
(3,935
|
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
)% |
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
92,088 |
|
|
|
95,850 |
|
|
|
(3,762
|
) |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Government
|
|
|
44,714 |
|
|
|
60,557 |
|
|
|
(15,843
|
) |
|
|
(26.2 |
)% |
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
136,802 |
|
|
$ |
156,407 |
|
|
$ |
(19,605
|
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
25.9 |
% |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Commercial
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Gross Margin
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
Revenue
generated in the Americas increased $173,000, or 0.3%, to $50.8 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $50.6 million for the same
period in 2009. Revenue from IT Outsourcing Services increased from new customer
contracts and expansion with existing customers. This increase was offset by a
decline in revenue earned from Ford. Revenue in IT Consulting and Systems
Integration decreased mainly due to the loss of customer contracts and a
decrease in project based work due to the difficult economic environment. The
Other Services segment also experienced a decrease in revenue from technical
staffing projects due primarily to less project based work. Gross margin from
the Americas increased to 20.2% for nine months ended September 30, 2010 from
20.1% for the same period in 2009 primarily due to improved operating
efficiencies and the realization of restructuring action taken in
2010.
Europe
Revenue
generated in Europe decreased $3.9 million, or 8.7%, to $41.3 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $45.3 million for the same period
in 2009 due to the conclusion of two customer contracts in the IT Outsourcing
segment and an approximate $1.0 million negative impact from exchange rates on
revenue. This decrease was partially offset by expansion with existing
customers. The foreign currency impact was calculated as if revenue in Europe
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were translated into U.S. dollars
at the average exchange rates in effect for the same period in 2009. Gross
margin from Europe increased to 25.9% for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, from 24.6% in 2009, primarily due to improved operating efficiencies and
the realization of restructuring action taken in 2010.
Operating
Expenses and
Other
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Operating
Expenses and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
|
$ |
31,741 |
|
|
$ |
30,823 |
|
|
$ |
918 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Restructuring
charge (credit)
|
|
$ |
2,687 |
|
|
$ |
(756
|
) |
|
$ |
3,443 |
|
|
|
(455 |
)% |
Net
interest expense
|
|
$ |
(555
|
) |
|
$ |
(897
|
) |
|
$ |
342 |
|
|
|
(38.1 |
)% |
Foreign
currency transaction loss
|
|
$ |
(3
|
) |
|
$ |
(720
|
) |
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
|
(99.6 |
)% |
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$ |
(1,578
|
) |
|
$ |
2,313 |
|
|
$ |
(3,891
|
) |
|
|
(168 |
)% |
SG&A
expense increased $918,000, or 3.0%, to $31.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 from $30.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The increase was mainly due to approximately $3.8 million of professional
fees related to the sale of the TechTeam Government Solutions subsidiary. The
increase was offset partially by an increase of $700,000 in the Company’s
allowance for doubtful accounts in the second quarter of 2009, a reduction in
amortization expense in 2010 from the write-down of certain intangible assets in
2009 and the realization of the restructuring actions taken in 2009 and 2010.
SG&A expense increased to 23.2% of total revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, from 19.7% of total revenue in 2009 primarily to the decline
in revenue and the increase in professional fees related to the sale of the
Government Solutions subsidiary.
On March
29, 2010, the Company announced a restructuring plan to reduce certain redundant
costs, eliminate excess capacity and support the Company's strategy to more
tightly focus its business. The restructuring plan was approved by the Company’s
Board of Directors on March 23, 2010. The initial 2010 pre-tax restructuring
charge amounted to $2,747,000, and was primarily related to separation costs for
approximately 30 employees and reductions in excess leased facility capacity
around the world. The Company reversed $118,000 of the initial charge in the
third quarter of 2010 from a change in the estimated amounts to terminate
facility leases which lowered the expected exit costs. Due to the inherent
uncertainty involved in estimating restructuring expenses, actual amounts paid
for such activities may differ from amounts initially estimated. The total
amount related to the 2010 pre-tax restructuring charge post adjustment was
$2,629,000.
In 2008,
the Company announced corporate-wide organizational realignment and
restructuring actions to improve operating efficiency, achieve greater global
consistency and drive improved financial performance. The 2008 pre-tax
restructuring charges amounted to $5.7 million and were primarily related to
separation costs for approximately 80 employees and reductions in excess leased
facility capacity. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in estimating
restructuring expenses, actual amounts paid for such activities may differ from
amounts initially estimated. Accordingly, previously recorded restructuring
related reserves of $756,000 were reversed in the nine months ended September
30, 2009 primarily from the Company favorably amending a lease for facilities in
Europe to eliminate its obligation to pay for leased space that was vacated and
expensed as part of the 2008 restructuring.
Net
interest expense was $555,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to $897,000 in 2009, a result of lower average outstanding long-term,
partially debt offset by lower interest income from lower average invested cash
equivalents and lower interest rates.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, the consolidated effective tax rate was
11.6%. The rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was lower than
the statutory rate of 34.0% primarily due to a $9.4 million impairment charge
taken in the third quarter of 2010 for which no tax benefit was recorded. Taking
an impairment charge with no tax benefit has the effect of lowering the
effective rate when expressed as a percent of a pretax loss.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, the consolidated effective tax rate was
36.1%. This rate differs from statutory levels primarily because the reversal of
the restructuring charge was recorded in Belgium where there was no tax expense
for the charge due to the substantial tax loss carry forwards from historical
net operating losses. Excluding restructuring charges, the effective tax
rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 41.0%. The effective
tax rate excluding the restructuring charges differs from the statutory tax rate
of 34.0% primarily due to state income taxes, foreign operating losses for which
a tax benefit is not recorded and non-deductible expenses.
Significant
Customers
We
conduct business under multiple contracts with various entities within the Ford
organization and with various agencies and departments of the U.S. Federal
Government. For the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, Ford
accounted for 12.3% and 14.5%, respectively, of the Company’s total revenue, and
the U.S. Federal Government accounted for 26.7% and 33.2%, respectively of the
Company’s total revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, Ford accounted for 11.7% and 15.0%, respectively, of the Company’s total
revenue, and the U.S. Federal Government accounted for 28.2% and 34.1%,
respectively, of the Company’s total revenue. For the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, 12.4% and 19.9% of the Company’s
total revenue was derived from agencies within the U.S. Department of Defense,
in the aggregate. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, 13.4% and 20.3% of our total revenue was derived from agencies
within the U.S. Department of Defense, in the aggregate.
Ford
Motor Company
Our
business with Ford consists of service desk and desk side services, technical
staffing, and network management. Revenue generated through our business with
Ford decreased to $16.0 million in the first nine months of 2010 from
$23.5 million in the first nine months of 2009. The decline in revenue is
attributable to a number of factors, including: (a) seat count and volume
declines within the Ford environment; (b) the effects of the entry into the
three-year renewal of the Global Single Point of Contact ("SPOC") contract,
which resulted in a change of the service delivery and pricing model as
discussed below; (c) the divestiture of Jaguar Land Rover (“JLR”) from the Ford
family of companies (we continue to provide services to JLR under a direct
contract); (d) the termination of the Company’s contract with Dell, Inc. under
which the Company provided systems integration services to Ford as a
subcontractor to Dell; and (e) the separation of Volvo Car Corporation from the
global Ford IT programs, including the SPOC contract on November 1,
2009.
On
December 23, 2008, the Company executed a new SPOC contract, under which
TechTeam provides support services to Ford's information technology
infrastructure. Under the SPOC contract, TechTeam provides service desk,
deskside support, service management, infrastructure management, and identity
and access management services to Ford in North America, Western Europe, Asia
and Latin America. The contract renewal provides for a significant change in the
service delivery model. These changes include the transition and centralization
of service for English speaking Ford personnel to our operations in the
Philippines, the transition of service for German speaking Ford personnel to
Romania, and an enhanced centralized remote deskside support management
function. This transition was completed in 2009.
Under the
existing SPOC contract, we provide these infrastructure support services under
specific service level metrics, and we invoice Ford based upon the number of
seats we support. The number of seats supported is determined bi-annually on
February 1 and August 1 of each year. If certain contractual conditions are met,
Ford and TechTeam have the right during each six month period to request one
out-of-cycle seat adjustment. We do not believe the revenue decline will
continue in 2010, as we have expanded the SPOC program into Latin America in
2010 and believe that we are well-positioned to expand into Latin America,
Canada and Asia during 2010.
U.S.
Federal Government
We
conduct business under multiple contracts with various agencies and departments
of the U.S. Federal Government. Revenue generated through our business with the
U.S. Federal Government decreased to $38.6 million in the first nine months
of 2010, from $53.4 million in 2009.
The
decline in revenue was primarily the result of the termination of our contract
for the Air National Guard (“ANG”), which ended on September 30, 2009. As
previously reported, ANG in-sourced the majority of the work performed under the
expiring contract. ANG did award a new contract to Harris Corporation,
with the Company as a subcontractor, which covered the work under the expiring
contract that was not in-sourced and additional positions. Accordingly, the new
contract will produce significantly less revenue and gross margin than the
expiring contract. Specifically, had the Company been delivering service under
the new contract for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, total U.S.
Federal Government revenue would have been reduced on a net basis by
approximately 15%.
Moreover,
the results of our Government business have been impacted by the difficult
government contracting environment created by the budget constraints our
customers faced. As a result of this environment, many customers have delayed
procurement actions, which have decreased the volume of business on many of our
contracts. Also, we have experienced delays in our expected new business
development.
On
October 5, 2010, the Company completed the sale of its TechTeam Government
Solutions Subsidiary. Please see Note 15 - Other Matters for further information
regarding the sale.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-09, “Subsequent Events (Topic 855):
Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” which amends ASC
855. ASU No. 2010-09 confirms the guidance in ASC 855 for SEC filers to match
subsequent event guidance issued by the SEC. The adoption of ASU No. 2010-09 did
not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820),” which amends the FASB’s ASC 820. ASC No. 2010-06
requires disclosures of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the
fair value hierarchy. ASU NO 2010-06 further requires entities to report, on a
gross basis, activity in the Level 3 fair value measurement reconciliation
beginning on January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 did not have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash and
cash equivalents were $19.0 million at September 30, 2010, as compared to
$15.0 million at December 31, 2009. Cash and cash equivalents
increased $4.0 million in the first nine months of 2010 mainly as a result
of $4.2 million in net cash provided by operating activities, an increase
of $1.3 million in cash from the issuance of long-term debt and $935,000 from
the sale of TechTeam SQM. This increase was partially offset by $1.5 million in
cash used for capital expenditures.
Net cash
from operating activities for the first nine months of 2010 provided cash of
$4.2 million compared to $17.0 million in the first nine months of 2009. Net
cash provided from operations for the first nine months of 2010 was primarily
due to a net loss of $10.9 million, adjusted for non-cash impairment charges of
$9.4 million, depreciation/amortization expense of $4.1 million and non-cash
stock based compensation expense of $1.7 million. Net changes in operating
assets and liabilities of $390,000 also contributed to cash provided by
operating activities. The net changes in operating assets and liabilities as of
September 30, 2010 were primarily related to a decrease in accounts receivable
principally driven by lower revenue and better collections. This was partially
offset by an increase in prepaid accounts and a decrease in accrued taxes due to
timing of payments. The cash generated from these operating cash flow
improvements was primarily used to pay down debt.
Cash
provided by operations for the first nine months of 2009 was primarily due to
net income of $3.8 million, adjusted for net changes in operating assets and
liabilities of $5.5 million, depreciation/amortization expense and non-cash
stock based compensation expense of $4.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
The net changes in operating assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2009
were primarily related to a decrease in accounts receivable of $9.6 million due
to increased collection efforts. This decrease was partially offset by a
decrease in accrued expenses of $3.5 million due to a $1.5 million decrease in
accrued restructuring and due to the timing of payments.
Net cash
used in investing activities was $1.0 million and $1.6 million for the first
nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Net cash used in investing
activities during the first nine months of 2010 was primarily from the purchase
equipment and software and to make payments to the selling shareholders of prior
acquisitions for achieving financial performance targets. This use was partially
offset by cash generated from the sale of TechTeam SQM on August 31, 2010. Net
cash used in investing activities during the first nine months of 2009 was to
purchase equipment and software and to make payments to the selling shareholders
of prior acquisitions for achieving financial performance targets. Capital
expenditures were $1.5 million and $1.2 million respectively, for the first
nine months of 2010 and 2009.
Net cash
provided by financing activities was $1.1 million for the first nine months of
2010. Net cash used in financing activities was $16.1 million for the first nine
months of 2009. Net cash provided by financing activities for the first nine
months of 2010 was mainly due to issuance of debt. Net cash used in financing
activities for the first nine months of 2009 was primarily due to a higher pay
down of debt.
Long-term
cash requirements, other than for normal operating expenses, are anticipated for
continued global expansion, enhancements of existing technologies, possible
repurchases of our common stock and the possible acquisition of businesses
complementary to our existing businesses. On October 5, 2010, the Company
completed the sale of its TechTeam Government Solutions subsidiary for $43.0
million subject to a net tangible book value adjustment currently estimated at
$2.5 million. The $43.0 million purchase price consists of approximately $31.6
million received in cash at closing and approximately $11.4 million that was
placed in escrow, each subject to such adjustments and other conditions set
forth in the Stock Purchase Agreement. The Company used $16.4 million of the
proceeds from the sale to completely pay off the debt facility. As of
October 5, 2010, no amounts were outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
The $16.4 million was included in the Current portion of long term debt on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2010. All commitments
including future loan issuance, letters of credit and other advances under the
Credit Agreement were terminated at this time. Please see Note 15 - Other
Matters for further information. In light of the Company’s cash flow and the
subsequent pay down of the debt facility, we believe that cash flows from
operations, together with existing cash balances will continue to be sufficient
to meet our ongoing operational requirements for the next twelve months and
foreseeable future. We have historically not paid dividends, and were restricted
from doing so under our Credit Agreement. Market conditions may limit our
sources of funds available, and the terms of such financings for these
activities to the extent financing is desirable or necessary.
Material
Commitments
There
have been no significant changes in our material commitments disclosed in “Item
7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
There
have been no changes in the selection and application of critical accounting
policies and estimates disclosed in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
ITEM
3 — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There
have been no material changes in reported market risks disclosed in “Item 7A —
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
ITEM
4 — CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)) under the
Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to the issuer's management, including its principal executive officer or
officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing
similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
In
accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), our management, under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered
by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of September 30, 2010, to
provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the
Company's reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Commission's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change
in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time
to time we are involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary
course of its business. None of these matters, individually or in the aggregate,
currently is material.
ITEM
1A — RISK FACTORS
Information
regarding risk factors appears in “Forward-Looking Statements,” in the Part I,
Item 2 of this Report and in Part I - Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. As of the date of
this filing, the following are material changes in the risk factors previously
disclosed in Part I - Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
The
announcement and pendency of our agreement to be acquired by Stefanini
International Holdings Ltd could adversely affect our business, financial
results and operations.
As a
result of the execution of the Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Agreement”) with
Stefanini International Holdings, Ltd. (“Stefanini”), employees of the Company
may become concerned about the future of the business and seek other employment.
Also, as a result of our execution of the Agreement and the announcement of the
tender offer, third parties may be unwilling to enter into material agreements
with us. New or existing customers may prefer to enter into agreements with our
competitors who have not expressed an intention to sell their business because
customers may perceive that such new relationships are likely to be more stable.
If we fail to complete the merger proposed in the Agreement (“Merger”), the
failure to maintain existing business relationships or enter into new ones could
adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
If the
proposed Merger, or a similar transaction, is not completed, the share price of
our common stock may change to the extent that the current market price of our
common stock reflects an assumption that a transaction will be completed. We
will also have incurred significant costs, including the diversion of management
resources, for which we will have received little or no benefit. In
addition, if the Merger is not consummated, we may not be able to develop and
implement a strategy for the future growth and development of the Company’s
business that would generate a return similar to or better than the return which
would be generated by the Merger.
There is no
assurance that the Merger will be completed.
We cannot
assure you that the proposed Merger will be consummated in the expected time
frame or at all. The consummation of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction
or waiver of a number of conditions, including, among others, the tendering by
the Company’s stockholders of over 50% of the outstanding shares of the
Company’s common stock. In addition, Stefanini may terminate the Agreement if
there is a material adverse effect on the business as defined in the
Agreement.
The Agreement
imposes restrictions on our ability to operate the Company, which may delay or
prevent us from undertaking business opportunities that may be beneficial to the
Company, pending completion of the Merger.
The
Agreement contains restrictions on our ability to operate the Company prior to
the closing. These restrictions could harm us by, among other things,
prohibiting, limiting or restricting our ability to take advantage of mergers,
acquisitions and other corporate opportunities or to take certain actions that
management may deem to be necessary or desirable to operate or grow the Company
or to increase its profitability.
If sufficient
stockholders fail to tender their shares in response to the tender offer, we may
not receive an offer from another potential acquirer of the Company on
satisfactory terms or at all.
If
sufficient stockholders fail to tender their shares in response to the tender
offer and the Agreement is subsequently terminated, we may decide to seek
another strategic transaction with respect to the Company. However, we may not
be able to find a potential acquirer of the Company willing to pay an equivalent
or more attractive price than that which would be paid pursuant to the tender
offer, and in fact any purchase price that we do find may be less.
We are not
permitted to terminate the Agreement except in limited circumstances,
and we may be required to pay a substantial termination fee to Stefanini
if the
Agreement is terminated.
The
Agreement does not generally allow us to terminate it, except in certain limited
circumstances. If the Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances for
specified reasons, we would be obligated to pay a termination fee of
$2,800,000.
The
tender offer to purchase shares of TechTeam Global common stock referenced in
this correspondence has not yet commenced, and this correspondence is neither an
offer to purchase, nor a solicitation of an offer to sell, any securities. The
tender offer to purchase shares of TechTeam Global common stock will be made
only pursuant to a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO containing an offer to
purchase, forms of letters of transmittal and other documents relating to the
tender offer (the “Tender Offer Statement”), which Platinum Merger Sub, Inc. a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Stefanini International Holdings Ltd, will file with
the SEC and mail to TechTeam Global stockholders. At the time the tender offer
is commenced, TechTeam Global will file a Solicitation / Recommendation
Statement with respect to the tender offer (the “Recommendation Statement”).
Security holders of TechTeam Global are advised to read the Tender Offer
Statement and Recommendation Statement when they become available, because they
will contain important information about the tender offer. Investors and
security holders of TechTeam Global also are advised that they may obtain free
copies of the Tender Offer Statement and other documents filed by Platinum
Merger Sub, Inc. with the SEC (when these documents become available) and the
Recommendation Statement and other documents filed by Stefanini International
Holdings Ltd (when these documents become available) on the SEC’s website at
http://www.sec.gov. In addition, free copies of the Tender Offer Statement and
related materials may be downloaded (when these documents become available) from
TechTeam Global’s website at: http://www.techteam.com/investors/sec-filings; and
free copies of the Recommendation Statement and related materials may be
obtained (when these documents become available) from TechTeam Global by written
request to: TechTeam Global, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 27335 West 11 Mile
Road, Southfield, Michigan 48033.
ITEM
2 — UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
There
were no sales of unregistered equity securities of the Company during the three
months ended September 30, 2010.
On
October 30, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program.
Under the program, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to one million
shares of its common stock as the Company deems appropriate. The Company is
limited under its current credit agreement with an annual limitation of $3.0
million per year on the repurchase of its common stock. The stock repurchase
program expires on December 31, 2011. The Company did not repurchase any shares
in the quarter ending September 30, 2010. The maximum number of shares that may
yet be purchased under the program is 987,742.
ITEM
5 — OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6 — EXHIBITS
The
following exhibits are filed as part of this report on Form 10-Q:
|
31.1
|
Principal
Executive Officer - Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Principal
Executive Officer - Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Principal
Executive Officer - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Principal
Executive Officer - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
TechTeam Global, Inc.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: November
9, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Gary J. Cotshott
|
|
Gary
J. Cotshott
|
|
|
|
|
President
and Chief Executive
|
|
|
|
|
Officer
(Principal Executive
|
|
|
|
|
Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Margaret M. Loebl
|
|
Margaret
M. Loebl
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Vice President, Chief
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer and
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Accounting
Officer)
|