e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-1169
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
OHIO
|
|
34-0577130 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1835 Dueber Ave., SW, Canton, OH
|
|
44706-2798 |
(Address of principal executive
|
|
(Zip Code) |
offices) |
|
|
330.438.3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
Common Stock, without par value
|
|
96,740,681 shares |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
THE TIMKEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,011.4 |
|
|
$ |
736.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,925.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,603.4 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
743.1 |
|
|
|
611.4 |
|
|
|
1,434.1 |
|
|
|
1,323.4 |
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
268.3 |
|
|
|
125.4 |
|
|
|
491.0 |
|
|
|
280.0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
140.7 |
|
|
|
128.0 |
|
|
|
273.7 |
|
|
|
251.4 |
|
Impairment and restructuring charges |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
50.7 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
126.6 |
|
|
|
(53.3 |
) |
|
|
210.8 |
|
|
|
(35.9 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
|
120.2 |
|
|
|
(61.4 |
) |
|
|
194.8 |
|
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations |
|
|
82.0 |
|
|
|
(38.4 |
) |
|
|
110.7 |
|
|
|
(39.8 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
(25.5 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
115.2 |
|
|
|
(68.9 |
) |
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
85.6 |
|
|
$ |
(64.5 |
) |
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
|
$ |
(63.6 |
) |
|
|
Amounts Attributable to The Timken Companys
Common Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
81.4 |
|
|
$ |
(39.0 |
) |
|
$ |
109.7 |
|
|
$ |
(34.5 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
(25.5 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
85.6 |
|
|
$ |
(64.5 |
) |
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
|
$ |
(63.6 |
) |
|
|
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share Attributable to The Timken
Companys Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
Earnings (loss) per share Discontinued Operations |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share Discontinued Operations |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Dollars in millions, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
796.2 |
|
|
$ |
755.5 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances: 2010 - $31.0 million; 2009 - $41.6 million |
|
|
500.3 |
|
|
|
411.2 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
699.5 |
|
|
|
671.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
111.3 |
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,114.3 |
|
|
|
2,022.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment Net |
|
|
1,263.5 |
|
|
|
1,335.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
218.3 |
|
|
|
221.7 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
127.5 |
|
|
|
132.1 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
234.7 |
|
|
|
248.6 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
Total Other Assets |
|
|
627.3 |
|
|
|
649.1 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,005.1 |
|
|
$ |
4,006.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
220.5 |
|
|
|
156.0 |
|
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
183.4 |
|
|
|
142.5 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
160.6 |
|
|
|
189.3 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
590.8 |
|
|
|
540.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
476.1 |
|
|
|
469.2 |
|
Accrued pension cost |
|
|
568.2 |
|
|
|
690.9 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits cost |
|
|
597.6 |
|
|
|
604.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
107.9 |
|
|
|
100.4 |
|
|
Total Non-Current Liabilities |
|
|
1,756.0 |
|
|
|
1,870.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class I and II Serial Preferred Stock without par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 10,000,000 shares each class, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock without par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 200,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued (including shares in treasury) (2010 - 98,153,317 shares;
2009 - 97,034,033 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated capital |
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
Other paid-in capital |
|
|
874.5 |
|
|
|
843.5 |
|
Earnings invested in the business |
|
|
1,495.8 |
|
|
|
1,402.9 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(743.8 |
) |
|
|
(717.1 |
) |
Treasury shares at cost (2010 - 1,412,636 shares; 2009 - 179,963 shares) |
|
|
(39.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,639.7 |
|
|
|
1,577.7 |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
1,658.3 |
|
|
|
1,595.7 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
4,005.1 |
|
|
$ |
4,006.8 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH PROVIDED (USED) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
|
$ |
(63.6 |
) |
(Earnings) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
29.1 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
95.2 |
|
|
|
101.8 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
Loss on disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Stock based compensation expense |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Pension and other postretirement expense |
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
Pension contributions and other postretirement benefit payments |
|
|
(133.6 |
) |
|
|
(34.7 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(103.8 |
) |
|
|
143.1 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(45.7 |
) |
|
|
204.1 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
|
(186.3 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Continuing Operations |
|
|
159.5 |
|
|
|
252.7 |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Discontinued Operations |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities |
|
|
164.0 |
|
|
|
253.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(39.0 |
) |
|
|
(53.3 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities Continuing Operations |
|
|
(37.4 |
) |
|
|
(48.2 |
) |
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(37.4 |
) |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
Net proceeds from common share activity |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(29.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Short-term debt activity net |
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used by Financing Activities |
|
|
(49.9 |
) |
|
|
(68.5 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(36.0 |
) |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
Increase In Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
143.7 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
755.5 |
|
|
|
133.4 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
796.2 |
|
|
$ |
277.1 |
|
|
See accompanying the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) for The Timken Company (the Company)
have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the
information and notes required by the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(U.S. GAAP) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals) and disclosures considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Certain amounts in the 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements have been
reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded two adjustments related to its 2008
Consolidated Financial Statements. Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
increased by $6.1 million (after-tax) due to a correction of an error related to the $18.4 million
goodwill impairment loss the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the Mobile
Industries segment. In recording this goodwill impairment loss, the Company did not recognize that
a portion of the loss related to two separate subsidiaries in India and South Africa of which the
Company holds less than 100% ownership. In addition, income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes decreased by $3.4 million, or $0.04 per share, ($2.0 million after-tax or $0.02
per share) due to a correction of an error related to $3.4 million of in-process research and
development costs that were recorded in other current assets with the anticipation of being paid
for by a third-party. However, the Company subsequently realized that the balance could not be
substantiated through a contract with a third party. The net effect of these errors understated
2008 net income attributable to The Timken Company of $267.7 million by $4.1 million. Furthermore,
the net effect of these errors overstated the Companys first quarter 2009 net income attributable
to The Timken Company of $0.9 million by $4.1 million. Had these adjustments been recorded in the
fourth quarter of 2008, rather than the first quarter of 2009, the results for the first quarter of
2009 would have been a net loss attributable to The Timken Company of $3.2 million. Management of
the Company concluded the effect of the first quarter adjustments was immaterial to the Companys
2008 and first-quarter 2009 financial statements, as well as to the full-year 2009 financial
statements.
Note 2 New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new accounting guidance that
amended the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest
entities. The implementation of the new accounting guidance related to variable interest entities,
effective January 1, 2010, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations
and financial condition.
Note 3 Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Inventories, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing supplies |
|
$ |
54.8 |
|
|
$ |
53.0 |
|
Work in process and raw materials |
|
|
342.6 |
|
|
|
269.1 |
|
Finished products |
|
|
302.1 |
|
|
|
349.1 |
|
|
Total Inventories, net |
|
$ |
699.5 |
|
|
$ |
671.2 |
|
|
An actual valuation of the inventory under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method can be made
only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly,
interim LIFO calculations must be based on managements estimates of expected year-end inventory
levels and costs. Because these calculations are subject to many factors beyond managements
control, annual results may differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end
LIFO inventory valuation. The LIFO reserve at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $244.3
million and $237.7 million, respectively. The Company recognized an increase in its LIFO reserve
of $0.5 million and $6.6 million during the second quarter and first six months of 2010
compared to a decrease in its LIFO reserve of $1.5 million and $13.3 million during the second
quarter and first six months of 2009.
4
Note 4 Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
$ |
590.3 |
|
|
$ |
611.7 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
2,789.0 |
|
|
|
2,786.4 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
3,379.3 |
|
|
|
3,398.1 |
|
Less allowances for depreciation |
|
|
(2,115.8 |
) |
|
|
(2,062.9 |
) |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment net |
|
$ |
1,263.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,335.2 |
|
|
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, machinery and equipment included approximately $107.7
million and $104.3 million, respectively, of capitalized software. Depreciation expense for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $44.9 million and $48.0 million, respectively.
Depreciation expense for the first six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $90.2 million and
$94.8 million, respectively. Depreciation expense on capitalized software for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $5.1 million and $5.8 million, respectively.
Depreciation expense on capitalized software for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was
approximately $10.4 million and $10.9 million, respectively.
Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
Balance |
|
Acquisitions |
|
Other |
|
Balance |
|
Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries |
|
$ |
49.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
|
$ |
46.8 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
162.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
161.9 |
|
Steel |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
221.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
$ |
218.3 |
|
|
Other primarily includes foreign currency translation adjustments.
5
The following table displays intangible assets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
79.1 |
|
|
$ |
16.5 |
|
|
$ |
62.6 |
|
|
$ |
79.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
64.8 |
|
Engineering drawings |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Know-how |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Industrial license agreements |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land-use rights |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Patents |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Technology use |
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
PMA licenses |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Unpatented technology |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
156.5 |
|
|
$ |
45.5 |
|
|
$ |
111.0 |
|
|
$ |
156.2 |
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
115.5 |
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
218.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218.3 |
|
|
|
221.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221.7 |
|
Tradename |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Industrial license agreements |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
FAA air agency certificates |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
234.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
234.8 |
|
|
$ |
238.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
238.3 |
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
391.3 |
|
|
$ |
45.5 |
|
|
$ |
345.8 |
|
|
$ |
394.5 |
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
353.8 |
|
|
Amortization expense for intangible assets for the three months and six months ended June 30,
2010 was $2.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets
is estimated to be approximately $11.4 million for 2010; $11.0 million in 2011; $10.6 million in
2012; $8.1 million in 2013 and $7.7 million in 2014.
Note 6 Financing Arrangements
Short-term debt at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variable-rate lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries
with various banks with interest rates
ranging from 2.17% to 4.71% and 1.98%
to 5.05% at June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
|
The lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries provide for borrowings up to
$280.6 million. At June 30, 2010, the Company had borrowings outstanding of $5.0 million, which
reduced the availability under these facilities to $275.6 million.
The Company has a $100 million Accounts Receivable Securitization Financing Agreement (Asset
Securitization Agreement), which expires November 15, 2010. Under the terms of the Asset
Securitization Agreement, the Company sells, on an ongoing basis, certain domestic trade
receivables to Timken Receivables Corporation, a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary that in turn
uses the trade receivables to secure borrowings, which are funded through a vehicle that issues
commercial paper in the short-term market. Borrowings under the agreement are limited to certain
borrowing base calculations. Any amounts outstanding under this Asset Securitization Agreement
would be reported on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet in Short-term debt. As of June 30,
2010, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Asset Securitization Agreement. The cost of
this credit facility, which is the commercial paper rate plus program fees, is considered a
financing cost and is included in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
6
Long-term debt at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Fixed-rate Medium-Term Notes, Series A, due at various dates through
May 2028, with interest rates ranging from 6.74% to 7.76% |
|
$ |
175.0 |
|
|
$ |
175.0 |
|
Fixed-rate Senior Unsecured Notes, due September 15, 2014,
with an interest rate of 6.0% |
|
|
249.7 |
|
|
|
249.7 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds,
maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.25% at June 30, 2010) |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding Bonds,
maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.42% at June 30, 2010) |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds,
maturing on June 1, 2033 (0.35% at June 30, 2010) |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
Variable-rate credit facility with US Bank for Advanced Green Components, LLC,
maturing on July 17, 2011 (1.41% at June 30, 2010) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Variable-rate credit facility with US Bank for Advanced Green
Components, LLC, guaranteed by The Timken Company,
maturing on July 17, 2011 (4.08% at June 30, 2010) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
488.4 |
|
|
|
486.2 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
476.1 |
|
|
$ |
469.2 |
|
|
On September 9, 2009, the Company completed a public offering of $250 million of fixed-rate 6.0%
unsecured Senior Notes, due in 2014. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes were used for the
repayment of the Companys fixed-rate 5.75% unsecured Senior Notes, which were due to mature on
February 15, 2010.
On July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a new $500 million Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(Senior Credit Facility). At June 30, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its
Senior Credit Facility but had letters of credit outstanding totaling $32.2 million, which reduced
the availability under the Senior Credit Facility to $467.8 million. This Senior Credit Facility
matures on July 10, 2012. Under the Senior Credit Facility, the Company has three financial
covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio, a consolidated interest coverage ratio and a consolidated
minimum tangible net worth test. At June 30, 2010, the Company was in full compliance with the
covenants under the Senior Credit Facility.
Advanced Green Components, LLC (AGC) is a joint venture of the Company. The Company is the
guarantor of $3.8 million of AGCs $8.5 million credit facility with US Bank. Effective as of July
17, 2010, AGC renewed its credit facility with US Bank for another 365 days.
Lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries also provide for long-term borrowings up to $27.1
million. At June 30, 2010, the Company had borrowings outstanding of $12.5 million, which reduced
the availability under these long-term facilities to $14.6 million.
Note 7 Product Warranty
The Company provides limited warranties on certain of its products. The Company accrues
liabilities for warranty based upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty claim
experience in accordance with accounting rules for contingent liabilities. Should the Company
become aware of a specific potential warranty claim for which liability is probable and reasonably
estimable, a specific charge is recorded and accounted for accordingly. Adjustments are made
quarterly to the accruals as claim data and historical experience change.
7
The following is a rollforward of the warranty accruals for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
the twelve months ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
Expense |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
The product warranty accrual at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was included in other current
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Note 8 Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Timken Company Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Invested |
|
|
Comp- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
in the |
|
|
rehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Business |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,595.7 |
|
|
$ |
53.1 |
|
|
$ |
843.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,402.9 |
|
|
$ |
(717.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
$ |
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
115.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(71.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement liability
adjustment (income tax benefit of $3.2 million) |
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of
derivative financial instruments,
net of reclassifications |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
88.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Dividends $0.22 per share |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from compensation |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 1,232,673 shares from treasury |
|
|
(31.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 1,119,284 share from authorized |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,658.3 |
|
|
$ |
53.1 |
|
|
$ |
874.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,495.8 |
|
|
$ |
(743.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(39.9 |
) |
|
$ |
18.6 |
|
|
The total comprehensive income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 was
$41.7 million and $88.5 million, respectively. The total comprehensive income for the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.8 million and $40.5 million, respectively.
The pension and postretirement liability adjustment of $42.8 million for the six months ended June
30, 2010 includes a $14.1 million prior period adjustment (benefit) related to deferred taxes on
post-retirement prescription drug benefits, specifically the employer subsidy provided by the U.S.
government under Medicare Part D. Refer to Note 13 Income Taxes in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on this prior period adjustment.
8
Note 9 Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from continuing operations attributable
to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
81.4 |
|
|
$ |
(39.0 |
) |
|
$ |
109.7 |
|
|
$ |
(34.5 |
) |
Less: undistributed earnings (loss)
allocated to nonvested stock |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
Income (Loss) from continuing operations
available to common shareholders for basic earnings (loss)
per share and diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
81.0 |
|
|
|
(38.7 |
) |
|
|
109.2 |
|
|
|
(34.1 |
) |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic |
|
|
96,305,087 |
|
|
|
96,147,809 |
|
|
|
96,336,974 |
|
|
|
96,082,491 |
|
Effect of dilutive options |
|
|
571,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding,
assuming dilution of stock options |
|
|
96,876,677 |
|
|
|
96,147,809 |
|
|
|
96,792,829 |
|
|
|
96,082,491 |
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
The exercise prices for certain stock options that the Company has awarded exceed the average
market price of the Companys common stock. Such stock options are antidilutive and were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The antidilutive stock options
outstanding were 1,554,605 and 4,129,493 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The antidilutive stock options outstanding were 1,960,955 and 4,533,820 for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Note 10 Segment Information
The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is
adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to
certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment
and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration costs, one-time gains and losses
on disposal of non-strategic assets, allocated receipts received or payments made under the U.S.
Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) and gains and losses on the dissolution of
subsidiaries).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
400.4 |
|
|
$ |
292.2 |
|
|
$ |
767.9 |
|
|
$ |
592.8 |
|
Process Industries |
|
|
211.0 |
|
|
|
206.4 |
|
|
|
416.9 |
|
|
|
430.5 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
109.2 |
|
|
|
174.8 |
|
|
|
218.5 |
|
Steel |
|
|
317.3 |
|
|
|
129.0 |
|
|
|
565.5 |
|
|
|
361.6 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,011.4 |
|
|
$ |
736.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,925.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,603.4 |
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Steel |
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.4 |
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
44.2 |
|
|
$ |
23.4 |
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Segment EBIT, as adjusted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
68.5 |
|
|
$ |
(12.0 |
) |
|
$ |
110.9 |
|
|
$ |
(14.3 |
) |
Process Industries |
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
55.8 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
Steel |
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
(32.9 |
) |
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
(40.2 |
) |
|
Total EBIT, as adjusted, for reportable segments |
|
$ |
147.6 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
249.6 |
|
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses |
|
|
(17.8 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
(31.6 |
) |
|
|
(25.5 |
) |
Impairment and restructuring |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(50.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(64.5 |
) |
Rationalization and integration charges |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Intersegment adjustments |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
120.2 |
|
|
$ |
(61.4 |
) |
|
$ |
194.8 |
|
|
$ |
(44.0 |
) |
|
Intersegment sales represent sales between the segments. These sales are eliminated upon consolidation.
Note 11 Impairment and Restructuring Charges
Impairment and restructuring charges by segment are comprised of the following:
For the three months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
Process |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Industries |
|
& Defense |
|
Steel |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Severance expense and related
benefit costs |
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
Process |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Industries |
|
& Defense |
|
Steel |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
26.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31.1 |
|
Severance expense and related
benefit costs |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
31.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
50.7 |
|
|
10
For the six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
Process |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Industries |
|
& Defense |
|
Steel |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Severance expense and related
benefit costs |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
Process |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Industries |
|
& Defense |
|
Steel |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
29.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34.9 |
|
Severance expense and related
benefit costs |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
|
$ |
36.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
64.5 |
|
|
The following discussion explains the major impairment and restructuring charges recorded for
the periods presented; however, it is not intended to reflect a comprehensive discussion of all
amounts in the tables above.
Selling and Administrative Reductions
In March 2009, the Company announced the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and
reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company
reduced its severance and related benefits accruals related to this initiative by $0.6 million.
During the first six months of 2010, the Company recorded $0.7 million of severance and related
benefit costs related to this initiative to eliminate approximately 25 associates. The $0.7
million charge for the first six months of 2010 primarily related to Corporate. During the second
quarter and the first six months of 2009, the Company recorded $8.5 million and $10.8 million,
respectively, of severance and related benefit costs related to this initiative to eliminate
approximately 270 associates. Of the $8.5 million charge for the second quarter of 2009, $4.1
million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1.8 million related to the Process Industries
segment, $1.1 million related to the Steel segment, $0.8 million related to the Aerospace segment
and $0.7 million related to Corporate. Of the $10.8 million charge for the first six months of
2009, $4.6 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $2.0 million related to the Process
Industries segment, $1.9 million related to Corporate, $1.5 million related to the Steel segment
and $0.8 million related to the Aerospace segment.
Manufacturing Workforce Reductions
During the second quarter and first six months of 2010, the Company recorded $0.8 million and $4.1
million, respectively, in severance and related benefit costs to eliminate approximately 150
associates to properly align its business as a result of the continued downturn in the economy and
expected market demand. The $0.8 million charge for the second quarter of 2010 primarily related
to the Aerospace and Defense segment. Of the $4.1 million charge for the first six months of 2010,
$1.5 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1.3 million related to the Process
Industries segment and $1.3 million related to the Aerospace and Defense segment. In addition, the
Company recorded $0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of exit costs in the second quarter
and first six months of 2010 related to this initiative. During the second quarter and first six
months of 2009, the Company recorded $8.7 million and $15.2 million, respectively, in severance and
related benefit costs, including a curtailment of pension benefits of $1.8 million, to eliminate
approximately 1,900 associates to properly align its business as a result of the economic downturn
and expected market demand. Of the $8.7 million charge for the second quarter of 2009, $4.6
million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1.8 million related to the Process Industries
segment, $1.7 million related to the Steel segment and $0.6 million related to the Aerospace and
Defense segment. Of the $15.2 million charge for the first six months of 2009, $10.3 million
related to the Mobile Industries segment, $2.5 million related to the Process Industries segment,
$1.7 million related to the Steel segment and $0.7 million related to the Aerospace and Defense
segment.
Torrington Campus
On July 20, 2009, the Company sold the remaining portion of its Torrington, Connecticut office
complex. In anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to record upon completion of the
sale of this property, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $6.4 million during the second
quarter of 2009.
11
Mobile Industries
In March 2007, the Company announced the closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo,
Brazil. The Company completed the closure of this manufacturing facility on March 31, 2010. The
Company expects to incur pretax costs of approximately $25 million to $30 million, which includes
restructuring costs and rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling,
general and administrative expenses. Mobile Industries has incurred cumulative pretax costs of
approximately $25.3 million as of June 30, 2010 related to this closure. During the second quarter
and first six months of 2010, the Company recorded $0.3 million of severance and related benefit
costs associated with the closure of the Companys Sao Paulo, Brazil manufacturing facility.
During the second quarter and first six months of 2009, the Company recorded $0.6 million and $1.2
million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs and exit costs of $0.8 million
associated with the closure of this facility.
In addition to the above charges, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.8 million during
the first six months of 2009 related to an impairment of fixed assets at one of its facilities in
France as a result of the carrying value of these assets exceeding expected future cash flows.
Process Industries
In May 2004, the Company announced plans to rationalize its three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio
within the Process Industries segment. This rationalization initiative is expected to deliver
annual pretax savings of approximately $35 million through streamlining operations and workforce
reductions, with expected pretax costs of approximately $70 million to $80 million (including
pretax cash costs of approximately $40 million), by the end of 2010.
The Company recorded impairment charges of $24.7 million and exit costs of $0.7 million during the
second quarter of 2009 as a result of the Process Industries rationalization plans. During the
first six months of 2009, the Company recorded impairment charges of $27.7 million and exit costs
of $1.3 million. The significant impairment charge was recorded during the second quarter of 2009
as a result of the rapid deterioration of the market sectors served by one of the rationalized
plants resulting in the carrying value of the fixed assets for this plant exceeding their projected
future cash flows. The Company then arrived at fair value by either valuing the assets in use,
where the assets were still producing product, or in exchange, where the assets had been idled.
The fair value was determined based on market comparisons of similar assets. The Company closed
this plant at the end of 2009. Including rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold
and selling, general and administrative expenses, the Process Industries segment has incurred
cumulative pretax costs of approximately $70.2 million as of June 30, 2010 for these
rationalization plans. As of June 30, 2010, the Process Industries segment has realized
approximately $15 million in annual pretax savings.
The following is a rollfoward of the consolidated restructuring accrual for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
Expense |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
(38.6 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
|
The restructuring accrual at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is included in other current
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The restructuring accrual at December 31, 2009
excludes costs related to the curtailment of pension benefit plans of $0.9 million. The accrual at
June 30, 2010 includes $12.8 million of severance and related benefits, with the remainder of the
balance primarily representing environmental exit costs. The majority of the $12.8 million accrual
relating to severance and related benefits is expected to be paid by the end of 2010.
12
Note 12 Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans
The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost for the Companys retirement and
postretirement benefit plans. The amounts for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010
are based on actuarial calculations prepared during 2009. These updated calculations may result in
different net periodic benefit cost for 2010. The net periodic benefit cost recorded for the three
months ended and six months ended June 30, 2010 is the Companys best estimate of each periods
proportionate share of the amounts to be recorded for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Components of net periodic
benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(50.8 |
) |
|
|
(48.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Curtailment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Components of net periodic
benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
16.5 |
|
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
|
78.1 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(100.1 |
) |
|
|
(96.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Curtailment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.2 |
|
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
On February 12, 2009, the Company was informed of alleged irregularities in the
operation of an equity-related investment in its U.S. defined benefit pension trust. A court-appointed receiver is now in control of the
outside investment firm and is conducting an ongoing investigation into the matter. In the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company recorded
a $13 million charge to other comprehensive income for the estimated loss related to this investment. The Company has up to $25 million of
crime insurance coverage and notified its insurance carriers about the matter. In July 2010, the Company received a payment of $20 million
from one of its insurance carriers.
13
Note 13 Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
|
$ |
(23.0 |
) |
|
$ |
84.1 |
|
|
$ |
(4.2 |
) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
37.5 |
% |
|
|
43.2 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
The Companys provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed in accordance with
Accounting Standards Codification 740 by applying the appropriate annual effective tax rates to
income or loss before income taxes for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items,
including interest on prior year tax liabilities, are recorded during the periods in which they
occur.
The effective tax rate on the pretax income for the second quarter of 2010 was favorable relative
to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to earnings in certain foreign
jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35%, partially offset by losses at certain
foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded, U.S. state and local tax and the net
effect of other items.
The effective tax rate on the pretax loss for the second quarter of 2009 was favorable relative to
the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to earnings in certain foreign
jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35%, partially offset by losses at certain
foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded, as well as the net impact of discrete
tax adjustments recorded during the period, and the net effect of other items.
The effective tax rate on the pretax income for the first six months of 2010 was unfavorable
relative to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to a $21.6 million charge recorded to reflect the deferred tax impact
of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (as amended) enacted in the first quarter of 2010, losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded,
U.S. state and local taxes and the net effect of other items. These increases were
partially offset by the earnings in certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is
less than 35%.
The effective tax rate on the pretax loss for the first six months of 2009 was unfavorable relative
to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to losses at certain foreign
subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded and the net effect of other items, partially
offset by earnings in certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35%.
In the first six months of 2010, the Companys unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $12.3
million. This includes a decrease of $17.9 million related to settlements with tax authorities and
a decrease of $3.0 million related to lapses in statutes of limitation, partially offset by an
increase of $8.3 million for tax positions related to prior years and an increase of $0.3 million
related to tax positions in the current year. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has approximately
$65.5 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits. Included in this amount is approximately
$44.0 million, which represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would favorably impact
the Companys effective income tax rate in any future periods if such benefits were recognized.
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a $14.1 million adjustment to other
comprehensive income for deferred taxes on postretirement prescription drug benefits, specifically
the employer subsidy provided by the U.S. government under the Medicare Part D program (the
Medicare subsidy). During the first quarter of 2010, the Company determined it had provided
deferred taxes on postretirement benefit plan accruals recorded through other comprehensive income
net of the Medicare subsidy, rather than on a gross basis. The cumulative impact of this error
resulted in a cumulative understatement of deferred tax assets totaling $14.1 million and a
corresponding overstatement of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Management concluded the
effect of the adjustment was not material to the Companys prior three fiscal years and first
quarter 2010 financial statements, as well as the estimated full-year 2010 financial statements.
14
Note 14 Divestitures
On December 31, 2009, the Company completed the sale of the assets of its Needle Roller Bearings
(NRB) operations to JTEKT Corporation (JTEKT). The Company received approximately $304 million in
cash proceeds for these operations and retained certain receivables, subject to post-sale working
capital adjustments. The NRB operations primarily serve the automotive original-equipment market
sectors and manufacture highly engineered needle roller bearings, including an extensive range of
radial and thrust needle roller bearings bearing assemblies and loose needles for automotive and
industrial applications. The NRB operations have facilities in the United States, Canada, Europe
and China. Results for 2009 for the NRB operations are presented as discontinued operations.
The following results of operations for this business have been treated as discontinued operations
for all periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
185.9 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194.9 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
Impairment and restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
Loss before income taxes on operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
Income tax benefit on operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Gain on divestiture |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense on disposal |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
(25.5 |
) |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
(29.1 |
) |
|
As of June 30, 2010, there were no assets or liabilities remaining from the divestiture of the
NRB operations.
Note 15 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary
risks managed by using derivative instruments are commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange
rate risk and interest rate risk. Forward contracts on various commodities are entered into to
manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of natural gas used in the Companys
manufacturing process. Forward contracts on various foreign currencies are entered into to manage
the foreign currency exchange rate risk on forecasted revenue denominated in foreign currencies.
Other forward exchange contracts on various foreign currencies are entered into to manage the
foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with certain of the Companys commitments
denominated in foreign currencies. Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate
risk associated with the Companys fixed and floating-rate borrowings.
The Company designates certain foreign currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted
revenues, and certain interest rate hedges as fair value hedges of fixed-rate borrowings. The
majority of the Companys natural gas forward contracts are not subject to any hedge designation as
they are considered within the normal purchases exemption.
The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $207.6 million of outstanding foreign currency forward
contracts at notional value. The total notional value of foreign currency hedges as of December
31, 2009 was $248.0 million.
15
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy
For certain derivative instruments that are designated as and qualify as cash flow hedges (i.e.,
hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a
particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is
reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in
the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods
during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative
instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the
hedged item, if any (i.e., the ineffective portion), or hedge components excluded from the
assessment of effectiveness, are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income during the
current period.
To protect against a reduction in the value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting
from export sales over the next year, the Company has instituted a foreign currency cash flow
hedging program. The Company hedges portions of its forecasted intra-group revenue or expense
denominated in foreign currencies with forward contracts. When the dollar strengthens significantly
against the foreign currencies, the decline in the present value of future foreign currency revenue
is offset by gains in the fair value of the forward contracts designated as hedges. Conversely,
when the dollar weakens, the increase in the present value of future foreign currency cash flows is
offset by losses in the fair value of the forward contracts.
Fair Value Hedging Strategy
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges (i.e., hedging the
exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or a liability or an identified portion thereof
that is attributable to a particular risk), the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, as well
as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized
in the same line item associated with the hedged item (i.e., in interest expense when the hedged
item is fixed-rate debt).
The following table presents the fair value and location of all assets and liabilities associated
with the Companys hedging instruments within the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
Value at |
|
Fair Value at |
|
Value at |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
6/30/10 |
|
06/30/09 |
|
6/30/10 |
|
06/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other non-current assets/liabilities |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
16
The following tables present the impact of derivative instruments and their location within the unaudited Consolidated Statement of
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
recognized in income on |
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
|
|
derivative |
|
derivative |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
Location of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Fair Value |
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Relationships |
|
derivative |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
Natural gas forward contracts |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
recognized in income on |
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
|
|
derivative |
|
derivative |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
Location of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge items in Fair Value |
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Relationships |
|
derivative |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Fixed-rate debt |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
Natural gas |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
recognized in OCI on |
|
reclassified from AOCI |
|
|
derivative |
|
into income (effective portion) |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
recognized in OCI on |
|
reclassified from AOCI |
|
|
derivative |
|
into income (effective portion) |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
recognized in income on |
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
|
|
derivative |
|
derivative |
|
|
Location of gain or (loss) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
Derivatives not designated as |
|
recognized in income on |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
hedging instruments |
|
derivative |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Foreign currency forward
contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign currency forward
contracts |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
Note 16 Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit
price). The FASB provides accounting rules that classify the inputs used to measure fair value
into the following hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or
liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. |
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges |
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Financial Instruments
The Company has adopted the revisions to the FASBs accounting rules regarding financial
instruments. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, commercial
paper, short-term borrowings and accounts payable are a reasonable estimate of their fair value due
to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of the Companys long-term fixed-rate
debt, based on quoted market prices, was $476.8 million and $440.1 million at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. The carrying value of this debt was $437.7 million and $430.6
million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Note 17 Subsequent Events
On July 19, 2010, the Company announced the execution of an agreement to acquire the business of QM
Bearings and Power Transmission, Incorporated (QM). QM is located in Ferndale, Washington and
manufactures spherical roller bearing steel housed units and elastomeric and steel couplings used
in demanding processes such as sawmill and logging operations. QM posted sales of more than $14
million in the last twelve months. The Company expects to close the transaction by the end of the
third quarter of 2010, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions.
18
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
Overview
Introduction
The Timken Company is a leading global manufacturer of highly engineered anti-friction bearings and
assemblies, high-quality alloy steels and aerospace power transmission systems as well as a
provider of related products and services. The Company operates under two business groups: the
Steel Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission
Group is composed of three operating segments: (1) Mobile Industries, (2) Process Industries and
(3) Aerospace and Defense. These three operating segments and the Steel Group comprise the
Companys four reportable segments.
The Mobile Industries segment provides bearings, power transmission components and related products
and services. Customers of the Mobile Industries segment include original equipment manufacturers
and suppliers for passenger cars, light trucks, medium and heavy-duty trucks, rail cars,
locomotives and agricultural, construction and mining equipment. Customers also include
aftermarket distributors of automotive products. The Companys strategy for the Mobile Industries
segment is to improve financial performance in the automotive and truck original-equipment markets
while leveraging more attractive markets in the rail and off-highway sectors and in the
aftermarket. This strategy could result in allocating assets to serve the most attractive market
sectors and restructuring or exiting those businesses where adequate returns cannot be achieved
over the long-term.
The Process Industries segment provides bearings, power transmission components and related
products and services. Customers of the Process Industries segment include original equipment
manufacturers of power transmission, energy and heavy industries machinery and equipment including
rolling mills, cement and aggregate processing equipment, paper mills, sawmills, printing presses,
cranes, hoists, drawbridges, wind energy turbines, gear drives, drilling equipment, coal conveyors
and crushers and food processing equipment. Customers also include aftermarket distributors of
products other than those for steel and automotive applications. The Companys strategy for the
Process Industries segment is to pursue growth in selected industrial market sectors, including the
aftermarket, and to achieve a leadership position in Asia.
The Aerospace and Defense segment manufactures bearings, helicopter transmission systems, rotor
head assemblies, turbine engine components, gears and other precision flight-critical components
for commercial and military aviation applications. The Aerospace and Defense segment also provides
aftermarket services, including repair and overhaul of engines, transmissions and fuel controls, as
well as aerospace bearing repair and component reconditioning. In addition, the Aerospace and
Defense segment manufactures precision bearings, higher-level assemblies and sensors for equipment
manufacturers of health and positioning control equipment. The Companys strategy for the
Aerospace and Defense segment is to: (1) grow by adding power transmission parts, assemblies and
services, utilizing a platform approach; (2) develop new aftermarket channels; and (3) improve
global capabilities through manufacturing initiatives.
The Steel segment manufactures more than 450 grades of carbon and alloy steel, which are produced
in both solid and tubular sections with a variety of lengths and finishes. The Steel segment also
manufactures custom-made steel products for both industrial and automotive applications. The
Companys strategy for the Steel segment is to drive profitable growth by focusing on opportunities
where the Company can offer differentiated capabilities.
In addition to specific segment initiatives, the Company has been making strategic investments in
business processes and systems. Project O.N.E. is a multi-year program launched in 2005 to improve
the Companys business processes and systems. The Company invested $215.8 million to implement
Project O.N.E, of which approximately $126.5 million has been capitalized on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. During 2008 and 2007, the Company completed the installation of Project O.N.E. for
the majority of the Companys domestic Bearings and Power Transmission Group operations and a major
portion of its European operations. In April 2009, the Company completed an additional
installation of Project O.N.E. for the majority of the Companys remaining European operations as
well as certain other facilities in North America and India. In May 2010, the Company completed
the final installation of Project O.N.E. This installation was for certain parts of the Aerospace
and Defense segment and other manufacturing and distribution operations in Asia, Europe and
Australia. With the completion of the May 2010 installation of Project O.N.E., approximately 90%
of the Bearings and Power Transmission Groups global sales flow through the new system.
On December 31, 2009, the Company completed the sale of the assets of its Needle Roller Bearings
(NRB) operations to JTEKT Corporation (JTEKT). The Company received approximately $304 million in
cash proceeds for these operations and retained certain receivables, subject to post-sale working
capital adjustments. The NRB operations manufacture needle roller bearings, including a range of
radial and thrust needle roller bearings, as well as bearing assemblies and loose needles for
automotive and industrial applications. The NRB operations had 2009 sales of approximately $407
million and approximately 80% of these sales were previously included in the Companys Mobile
Industries segment with the remainder included in the Process Industries and Aerospace and Defense
reportable segments. Results for 2009 for the NRB operations are presented as discontinued
operations. The Company incurred an after-tax loss of approximately $12.6 million on the sale of
the NRB operations during the fourth quarter of 2009. During the first six months of 2010, the
Company recorded an after-tax gain of
19
approximately $4.5 million on the sale of the NRB operations primarily due to a working capital
adjustment on net retained receivables.
Financial Overview
Overview:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,011.4 |
|
|
$ |
736.8 |
|
|
$ |
274.6 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
% |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
82.0 |
|
|
|
(38.4 |
) |
|
|
120.4 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
(25.5 |
) |
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
116.5 |
% |
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Net income (loss) attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
85.6 |
|
|
$ |
(64.5 |
) |
|
$ |
150.1 |
|
|
|
232.7 |
% |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
NM |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
114.8 |
% |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
|
231.3 |
% |
Average number of shares diluted |
|
|
96,876,677 |
|
|
|
96,147,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,925.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,603.4 |
|
|
$ |
321.7 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
% |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
110.7 |
|
|
|
(39.8 |
) |
|
|
150.5 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
115.5 |
% |
Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
118.9 |
% |
Net income (loss) attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
|
$ |
(63.6 |
) |
|
$ |
177.8 |
|
|
|
279.6 |
% |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
NM |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
116.7 |
% |
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
278.8 |
% |
Average number of shares diluted |
|
|
96,792,829 |
|
|
|
96,082,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
The Timken Company reported net sales for the second quarter of 2010 of $1.0 billion, compared to
$736.8 million in the second quarter of 2009, an increase of 37%. Net sales for the first six
months of 2010 were $1.9 billion, compared to $1.6 billion in the first six months of 2009, an
increase of 20%. Higher sales for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 were primarily
driven by strong demand from the Mobile Industries and Steel segments, as well as higher surcharges,
partially offset by lower sales in the Aerospace and Defense segment. For the second quarter of
2010, net income per diluted share was $0.88 compared to a loss of $0.67 per share for the second
quarter of 2009. Income from continuing operations per diluted share for the second quarter of
2010 was $0.84 per diluted share compared to a loss of $0.40 per share for the second quarter of
2009. For the first six months of 2010, net income per diluted share was $1.18 compared to a loss
of $0.66 per share for the first six months of 2009. Income from continuing operations per diluted
share for the first six months of 2010 was $1.13 per diluted share compared to a loss of $0.36 per
share for the first six months of 2009.
The Companys second quarter and first six months results reflect the improvement in the mobile
market sectors, higher surcharges, improved manufacturing performance and the favorable impact of
restructuring initiatives, partially offset by lower demand from industrial and aerospace markets,
higher LIFO expense and higher expense related to incentive compensation plans. Results for the
first six months of 2010 also reflect a one-time charge of $21.6 million to record the deferred tax
impact of U.S. health care legislation enacted in the first quarter of 2010.
20
Income (loss) from discontinued operations in the second quarter and first six months of 2010
significantly increased from the second quarter and first six months of 2009. The income from
discontinued operations recognized in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 is the result of
working capital adjustments related to net retained receivables while the loss from discontinued
operations recognized in 2009 was due to the negative impact of the deteriorating global economy on
NRBs business operations.
Outlook
The Companys outlook for 2010 reflects a modest improvement in the global economy following the
deteriorating global economic climate that occurred throughout 2009. The Company expects sales in
2010 to be approximately 25% to 30% higher than 2009, primarily driven by stronger sales volume in
the Steel and Mobile Industries segments, as well as higher steel surcharges, partially offset by a decline
in sales from the Aerospace and Defense segment. As a result of the Companys improved operating
performance and its 2009 cost reduction initiatives, the Company expects to leverage sales growth.
The strengthening margins will be partially offset by higher expense related to incentive
compensation plans.
The Company expects to continue to generate cash from operations in 2010 as a result of higher
earnings in 2010 compared to 2009. Pension contributions are also
expected to increase to approximately $135 million in 2010, including over $100 million of
discretionary U.S. contributions, compared to $65 million in 2009. As a result, the Company expects to generate cash from operating
activities in excess of $380 million in 2010. In addition, the Company expects to increase capital
expenditures by approximately 25% in 2010 compared to 2009.
Sales by Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
400.4 |
|
|
$ |
292.2 |
|
|
$ |
108.2 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
% |
Process Industries |
|
|
211.0 |
|
|
|
206.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
109.2 |
|
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
(24.3) |
% |
Steel |
|
|
317.3 |
|
|
|
129.0 |
|
|
|
188.3 |
|
|
|
146.0 |
% |
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
1,011.4 |
|
|
$ |
736.8 |
|
|
$ |
274.6 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
767.9 |
|
|
$ |
592.8 |
|
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
% |
Process Industries |
|
|
416.9 |
|
|
|
430.5 |
|
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.2) |
% |
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
174.8 |
|
|
|
218.5 |
|
|
|
(43.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.0) |
% |
Steel |
|
|
565.5 |
|
|
|
361.6 |
|
|
|
203.9 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
% |
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
1,925.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,603.4 |
|
|
$ |
321.7 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
Net sales for the second quarter of 2010 increased $274.6 million, or 37.3%, compared to the second
quarter of 2009, primarily due to higher volume of approximately $220 million primarily across the
Mobile Industries light vehicles market sector and the Steel business segment and higher
surcharges of $84 million, partially offset by unfavorable sales mix and the effect of foreign
currency exchange rate changes of approximately $25 million.
Net sales for the first six months of 2010 increased $321.7 million, or 20.1%, compared to the first
six months of 2009, primarily due to higher volume of approximately $260 million primarily across
the Mobile Industries light vehicles market sector and the Steel business segment and higher
surcharges of $106 million, partially offset by unfavorable sales mix of approximately $40 million.
21
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
268.3 |
|
|
$ |
125.4 |
|
|
$ |
142.9 |
|
|
|
114.0 |
% |
Gross profit % to net sales |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
950 |
bps |
Rationalization expenses in cost of products sold |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(57.1) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
491.0 |
|
|
$ |
280.0 |
|
|
$ |
211.0 |
|
|
|
75.4 |
% |
Gross profit % to net sales |
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
bps |
Rationalization expenses in cost of products sold |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(30.8) |
% |
|
Gross profit margin increased in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009
primarily due to an increase in steel surcharges of approximately $84 million, the impact of higher
sales volume of approximately $85 million, improved manufacturing utilization of approximately $70
million and a favorable price mix of approximately $20 million, partially offset by higher material
costs of approximately $100 million.
Gross profit margin increased in the first six months of 2010 compared to the first six months of
2009 primarily due to improved manufacturing utilization of approximately $120 million, an increase
in steel surcharges of approximately $106 million, the impact of higher sales volume of
approximately $90 million and a favorable price mix of approximately $20 million, partially offset
by higher material costs of $115 million and higher LIFO expense of $20 million.
In the second quarter and first six months of 2010 and 2009, rationalization expenses included in
cost of products sold primarily related to the continued rationalization of Process Industries
Canton, Ohio bearing manufacturing facilities. Rationalization expenses in the second quarter and
the first six months of 2010 primarily consisted of relocation of equipment. Rationalization
expenses in the second quarter and the first six months of 2009 primarily consisted of accelerated
depreciation and relocation of equipment.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$ |
140.7 |
|
|
$ |
128.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expense % to net sales
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(350) bps
|
Rationalization expenses included in selling, general
and administrative expenses
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(87.5) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$ |
273.7 |
|
|
$ |
251.4 |
|
|
$ |
22.3 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expense % to net sales
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(150) bps
|
Rationalization expenses included in selling, general
and administrative expenses
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(72.7) |
% |
|
22
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2010,
compared to the second quarter of 2009, was primarily due to higher expense related to incentive
compensation plans of approximately $20 million, partially offset by savings from restructuring
initiatives of approximately $5 million. The increase in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the first six months of 2010, compared to the first six months of 2009, was primarily
due to higher expense related to incentive compensation plans of approximately $45 million,
partially offset by savings from restructuring initiatives of approximately $20 million.
Impairment and Restructuring Charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Impairment Charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31.1 |
|
|
$ |
(31.1 |
) |
Severance and related benefit costs |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
Exit Costs |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
50.7 |
|
|
$ |
(49.7 |
) |
|
Impairment and Restructuring Charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Impairment Charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34.9 |
|
|
$ |
(34.9 |
) |
Severance and related benefit costs |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
Exit Costs |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
64.5 |
|
|
$ |
(58.0 |
) |
|
The following discussion explains the major impairment and restructuring charges recorded for the
periods presented; however, it is not intended to reflect a comprehensive discussion of all amounts
in the tables above. See Note 11 Impairment and Restructuring for further details by segment.
Selling and Administrative Cost Reductions
In March 2009, the Company announced the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and
reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn. The Company targeted pretax savings of
approximately $80 million in annual selling and administrative costs. This target
was achieved in 2009. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company reduced its severance and
related benefits accruals related to this initiative by $0.6 million. During the first six months
of 2010, the Company recorded $0.7 million of severance and related benefit costs related to this
initiative to eliminate approximately 25 associates. The $0.7 million charge for the first six
months of 2010 primarily related to Corporate. During the second quarter and first six months of
2009, the Company recorded $8.5 million and $10.8 million, respectively, of severance and related
benefit costs related to this initiative to eliminate approximately 270 associates. Of the $8.5
million charge for the second quarter of 2009, $4.1 million related to the Mobile Industries
segment, $1.8 million related to the Process Industries segment, $1.1 million related to the Steel
segment, $0.8 million related to the Aerospace and Defense segment and $0.7 million related to Corporate. Of
the $10.8 million charge for the first six months of 2009, $4.6 million related to the Mobile
Industries segment, $2.0 million related to the Process Industries segment, $1.9 million related to
Corporate, $1.5 million related to the Steel segment and $0.8 million related to the Aerospace and Defense segment.
23
Manufacturing Workforce Reductions
During the second quarter and first six months of 2010, the Company recorded $0.8 million and $4.1
million, respectively, in severance and related benefit costs to eliminate approximately 150
associates to properly align its business as a result of the continued downturn in the economy and
expected market demand. The $0.8 million charge for the second quarter of 2010 primarily related
to the Aerospace and Defense segment. Of the $4.1 million charge for the first six months of 2010,
$1.5 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1.3 million related to the Process
Industries segment and $1.3 million related to the Aerospace and Defense segment. In addition, the
Company recorded $0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of exit costs in the second quarter
and first six months of 2010 related to this initiative. During the second quarter and first six
months of 2009, the Company recorded $8.7 million and $15.2 million, respectively, in severance and
related benefit costs, including a curtailment of pension benefits of $1.8 million, to eliminate
approximately 1,900 associates to properly align its business as a result of the economic downturn
and expected market demand. Of the $8.7 million charge for the second quarter of 2009, $4.6
million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1.8 million related to the Process Industries
segment, $1.7 million related to the Steel segment and $0.6 million related to the Aerospace and
Defense segment. Of the $15.2 million charge for the first six months of 2009, $10.3 million
related to the Mobile Industries segment, $2.5 million related to the Process Industries segment,
$1.7 million related to the Steel segment and $0.7 million related to the Aerospace and Defense
segment.
Torrington Campus
On July 20, 2009, the Company sold the remaining portion of its Torrington, Connecticut office
complex. In anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to record upon completion of the
sale of this property, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $6.4 million during the second
quarter of 2009.
Mobile Industries
In March 2007, the Company announced the closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo,
Brazil. The Company completed the closure of this manufacturing facility on March 31, 2010. This
closure is targeted to deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $5 million, with expected
pretax costs of approximately $25 million to $30 million, which includes restructuring costs and
rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, general and administrative
expenses. The Company expects to realize the $5 million of annual pretax savings by the end of
2010. Mobile Industries has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately $25.3 million as of
June 30, 2010 related to this closure. During the second quarter and first six months of 2010, the
Company recorded $0.3 million of severance and related benefit costs associated with the closure of
the Companys Sao Paulo, Brazil manufacturing facility. During the second quarter and first six
months of 2009, the Company recorded $0.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of severance and
related benefit costs and exit costs of $0.8 million associated with the closure of this facility.
In addition to the above charges, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.8 million during
the first six months of 2009 related to an impairment of fixed assets at one of its facilities in
France as a result of the carrying value of these assets exceeding expected future cash flows.
Process Industries
In May 2004, the Company announced plans to rationalize its three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio
within the Process Industries segment. This rationalization initiative is expected to deliver
annual pretax savings of approximately $35 million through streamlining operations and workforce
reductions, with expected pretax costs of approximately $70 million to $80 million (including
pretax cash costs of approximately $40 million), by the end of 2010.
The Company recorded impairment charges of $24.7 million and exit costs of $0.7 million during the
second quarter of 2009 as a result of the Process Industries rationalization plans. During the
first six months of 2009, the Company recorded impairment charges of $27.7 million and exit costs
of $1.3 million. The significant impairment charge was recorded during the second quarter of 2009
as a result of the rapid deterioration of the market sectors served by one of the rationalized
plants resulting in the carrying value of the fixed assets for this plant exceeding their projected
future cash flows. The Company then arrived at fair value by either valuing the assets in use,
where the assets were still producing product, or in exchange, where the assets had been idled.
The fair value was determined based on market comparisons of similar assets. The Company closed
this plant at the end of 2009. Including rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold
and selling, general and administrative expenses, the Process Industries segment has incurred
cumulative pretax costs of approximately $70.2 million as of June 30, 2010 for these
rationalization plans. As of June 30, 2010, the Process Industries segment has realized
approximately $15 million in annual pretax savings.
24
Rollforward of Restructuring Accruals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
Expense |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
(38.6 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
|
The restructuring accrual at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is included in other liabilities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The restructuring accrual at December 31, 2009 excludes costs
related to the curtailment of pension benefit plans of $0.9 million. The accrual at June 30, 2010
includes $12.8 million of severance and related benefits, with the remainder of the balance
primarily representing environmental exit costs. The majority of the $12.8 million accrual
relating to severance and related benefits is expected to be paid by the end of 2010.
Interest Expense and Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
% |
Interest income |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
Interest income |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
% |
|
Interest expense for the second quarter and the first six months of 2010 increased compared to the
second quarter and the first six months of 2009, primarily due to the amortization of deferred
financing costs associated with the refinancing of the Companys $500 million Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement (Senior Credit Facility) and the issuance of $250 million aggregate principal
amount of fixed-rate 6% unsecured senior notes (Senior Notes), both of which occurred in the third
quarter of 2009, and lower capitalized interest, partially offset by lower interest expense at
non-US affiliates due to lower debt levels. Interest income for the second quarter and the first
six months of 2010 increased compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to higher
invested cash balances.
Other Income and Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Other income (expense), net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on dissolution of subsidiaries |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(87.5) |
% |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Other income (expense), net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on divestitures of nonstrategic assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(100.0) |
% |
(Loss) gain on dissolution of subsidiaries |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(114.3) |
% |
Other income |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(62.7) |
% |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(73.4) |
% |
|
The gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets for the first six months of 2009 related to the
sale of one of the buildings at the Companys former office complex located in Torrington,
Connecticut.
For the second quarter of 2010, other income (expense) primarily consisted of $4.8 million in
foreign currency exchange gains, royalty income of $0.6 million and export incentives of $0.3
million, partially offset by $2.1 million in charitable donations and $1.3 million in losses on the
disposal of fixed assets. For the second quarter of 2009, other income (expense) primarily
consisted of $1.0 million of losses on disposal of fixed assets, $0.6 million of losses on equity
investments, partially offset by capital gains of $0.3 million and royalty income of $0.2 million.
For the first six months of 2010, other income primarily consisted of $4.4 million in foreign
currency exchange gains, royalty income of $0.8 million and export incentives of $0.5 million,
partially offset by $2.3 million in charitable donations and $2.2 million in losses on the disposal
of fixed assets. For the first six months of 2009, other income (expense) primarily consisted of
$6.9 million of foreign currency exchange gains and royalty income of $0.7 million, partially
offset by losses on the disposal of fixed assets of $1.8 million.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
|
$ |
(23.0 |
) |
|
$ |
61.2 |
|
|
NM |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
37.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(570 |
)bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
84.1 |
|
|
$ |
(4.2 |
) |
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
|
NM |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
43.2 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
3,370 |
bps |
|
The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2010 was less than the U.S. Federal statutory tax
rate of 35% primarily as a result of lower taxes related to non-U.S. earnings, partially offset by
U.S. state and local taxes and the net impact of other items. The change in the effective tax rate
versus the second quarter of 2009 was primarily due to lower taxes on non-U.S. earnings, partially
offset by a reduction in U.S. tax benefits as a result of the expiration of the U.S. research tax
credit at the end of 2009 and the enactment of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of
2010 (as amended) in the first quarter of 2010.
The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2010 was higher than the U.S. Federal statutory
tax rate of 35% primarily as a result of a $21.6 million charge in the first quarter to record the
deferred tax impact of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (as amended), U.S.
state and local taxes and the net impact of other items, partially offset by the impact of lower
taxes related to non-U.S. earnings. The change in the effective tax rate versus the first six
months of 2009 was primarily due to the $21.6 million charge in the first quarter of 2010,
partially offset by lower taxes on non-U.S. earnings.
26
Discontinued Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Operating results, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(25.5 |
) |
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Gain on disposal, net of tax |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
(25.5 |
) |
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
|
116.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Operating results, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(29.1 |
) |
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Gain on disposal, net of tax |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
(29.1 |
) |
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
|
115.5 |
% |
|
In December 2009, the Company completed the divestiture of its NRB operations to JTEKT.
Discontinued operations for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 represent the operating
results, net of tax, of these operations. In the second quarter and first six months of 2010, the
Company recognized a gain of $4.2 million and $4.5 million, respectively, on disposal of the NRB
operations. The gain, net of tax, primarily represents a working capital adjustment related to net
retained receivables. Refer to Note 14 Divestitures in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional discussion.
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
(5.3 |
) |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
118.9 |
% |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest was income of $0.6 million for the second
quarter of 2010, compared to income of $0.6 million for the second quarter of 2009. Net income
(loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest was income of $1.0 million for the first six months
of 2010, compared to a loss of $5.3 million for the first six months of 2009.
In the first six months of 2009, net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
increased by $6.1 million due to a correction of an error related to the $18.4 million goodwill
impairment loss the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the Mobile Industries
segment. In recording the goodwill impairment loss in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company did
not recognize that a portion of the goodwill impairment loss related to two separate subsidiaries
in India and South Africa of which the Company holds less than 100% ownership. The net effect of
this error understated the Companys 2008 net income attributable to The Timken Company of $267.7
million by $6.1 million. Furthermore, the first quarter 2009 adjustment for this error overstated
the Companys first quarter 2009 net income attributable to The Timken Company by $6.1 million.
Management concluded the effect of the first-quarter 2009 adjustment was not material to the
Companys 2008 and first-quarter 2009 financial statements, as well as the full-year 2009 financial
statements.
27
Business Segments:
The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is
adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to
certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment
and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration charges, one-time gains or losses
on disposal of non-strategic assets and gains and losses on the dissolution of subsidiaries).
Refer to Note 10 Segment Information in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
the reconciliation of adjusted EBIT by segment to consolidated income before income taxes.
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales for each segment reported in accordance
with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of currency exchange rates. The effects
of currency exchange rates are removed to allow investors and the Company to meaningfully evaluate
the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to period. The presentation
would also remove the effects of acquisitions and divestitures on sales, but there were none in
2010 or 2009 other than the divestiture of the NRB operations, which is already reflected as
discontinued operations. The year 2009 represents the base year for which the effects of currency
are measured; as such, currency is assumed to be zero for 2009.
Mobile Industries Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
400.4 |
|
|
$ |
292.2 |
|
|
$ |
108.2 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
68.5 |
|
|
$ |
(12.0 |
) |
|
$ |
80.5 |
|
|
NM |
|
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
-4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
2,120 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
767.9 |
|
|
$ |
592.8 |
|
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
110.9 |
|
|
$ |
(14.3 |
) |
|
$ |
125.2 |
|
|
NM |
|
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
-2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
1,680 |
bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Mobile Industries segment operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP
to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of currency exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
400.4 |
|
|
$ |
292.2 |
|
|
$ |
108.2 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
% |
Currency |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
402.7 |
|
|
$ |
292.2 |
|
|
$ |
110.5 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
767.9 |
|
|
$ |
592.8 |
|
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
% |
Currency |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
758.5 |
|
|
$ |
592.8 |
|
|
$ |
165.7 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
% |
|
28
The Mobile Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
increased 37.8% for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009, primarily
due to higher volume of approximately $100 million. The volume increases were seen across most
market sectors led by a 58% increase in heavy truck, a 56% increase in light vehicles and a 36%
increase from the off-highway market. Adjusted EBIT was higher in the second quarter of 2010
compared to the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to higher volume and favorable sales mix of
approximately $60 million and better manufacturing utilization of approximately $20 million.
The Mobile Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
increased 28.0% for the first six months of 2010 compared to the first six months of 2009,
primarily due to higher volume of approximately $175 million. The volume increases were seen
across most market sectors, led by a 58% increase in heavy truck, a 51% increase in light vehicles
and a 26% increase from the automotive aftermarket. Adjusted EBIT was higher in the first six
months of 2010 compared to the first six months of 2009, primarily due to higher volume and
favorable sales mix of approximately $100 million and better manufacturing utilization of
approximately $50 million, partially offset by higher logistics and manufacturing costs of $25
million.
The Mobile Industries segments sales are expected to increase approximately 20% to 25% percent in
2010, compared to 2009 full-year results, as demand is expected to increase across most of the
Mobile Industries market sectors, led by increases in global heavy truck demand of approximately
40%, off-highway market of approximately 28% and global light-vehicle demand of approximately 25%.
The Company also expects sales to increase approximately 25% in its automotive distribution channel
during 2010, compared to the full year of 2009. In addition, adjusted EBIT for the Mobile
Industries segment is expected to increase significantly during 2010, compared to 2009, primarily
due to higher sales volume.
Process Industries Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including
intersegment sales |
|
$ |
211.6 |
|
|
$ |
207.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
28.9 |
|
|
$ |
35.1 |
|
|
$ |
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(330 |
)bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including
intersegment sales |
|
$ |
418.2 |
|
|
$ |
432.1 |
|
|
$ |
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.2) |
% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
55.8 |
|
|
$ |
78.6 |
|
|
$ |
(22.8 |
) |
|
|
(29.0) |
% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(490 |
)bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Process
Industries segment operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net
sales adjusted to remove the effects of currency exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
211.6 |
|
|
$ |
207.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of
currency |
|
$ |
213.8 |
|
|
$ |
207.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
418.2 |
|
|
$ |
432.1 |
|
|
$ |
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.2) |
% |
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of
currency |
|
$ |
411.9 |
|
|
$ |
432.1 |
|
|
$ |
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.7) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
29
The Process Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
increased 3.3% in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year,
primarily due to higher volume of approximately $15 million, partially offset by unfavorable
pricing of approximately $5 million. The higher volume was seen across several market sectors, led
by a 119% increase in cement and aggregate processing equipment demand, a 52% increase in global
wind energy markets demand and a 14% increase in gear drive demand. These increases were partially
offset by a 42% decrease in oil and gas demand and a 19% decline in global metals and mining
demand. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of
2009, primarily due to an increase in performance-based compensation of approximately $6 million.
The Process Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
decreased 4.7% in the first six months of 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year,
primarily due to lower volume of approximately $15 million. The lower volume was seen across most
market sectors, led by a 37% decline in oil and gas demand and a 14% decline in gear drive demand.
These declines were partially offset by an increase in global wind energy market demand of 40% and
an increase in power generation of 31%. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the first six months of 2010
compared to the first six months of 2009, primarily due to the impact of lower volumes of
approximately $10 million and unfavorable pricing at approximately $5 million. The Company expects
sales in the Process Industries segment to increase approximately 5% for the full year of 2010
compared to 2009, as the industrial distribution channel strengthens during the second half of
2010. However, the Process Industries segment expects 2010 adjusted EBIT to be flat compared to
the full year of 2009, as the impact of higher volume is offset by higher raw material costs and
higher expense related to incentive compensation plans.
Aerospace and Defense Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
82.7 |
|
|
$ |
109.2 |
|
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
(24.3 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
|
$ |
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
(61.5 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(840 |
)bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
174.8 |
|
|
$ |
218.5 |
|
|
$ |
(43.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
|
$ |
36.8 |
|
|
$ |
(16.8 |
) |
|
|
(45.7 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(540 |
)bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales
of the Aerospace and Defense operations reported in
accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove
the effects of currency exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
82.7 |
|
|
$ |
109.2 |
|
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
(24.3) |
% |
Currency |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
83.4 |
|
|
$ |
109.2 |
|
|
$ |
(25.8 |
) |
|
|
(23.6) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
174.8 |
|
|
$ |
218.5 |
|
|
$ |
(43.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.0) |
% |
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
174.8 |
|
|
$ |
218.5 |
|
|
$ |
(43.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.0) |
% |
|
30
The Aerospace and Defense segments net sales, excluding the impact of currency-rate changes,
decreased 23.6% in the second quarter of 2010, compared to the second quarter of 2009, primarily
due to a decrease in volume of approximately $30 million. Volume was down across most key market
sectors as the Aerospace and Defense segment continues to experience softening that began in the
middle of the prior year. Profitability for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second
quarter of 2009 declined primarily due to the lower volume.
The Aerospace and Defense segments net sales, excluding the impact of currency-rate changes,
decreased 20.0% in the first six months of 2010, compared to the first six months of 2009,
primarily due to a decrease in volume of approximately $50 million, partially offset by favorable
sales mix and higher pricing. Volume was down across most key market sectors as the Aerospace and
Defense segment continues to experience softening that began in the middle of the prior year.
Profitability for the first six months of 2010 compared to the first six months of 2009 declined
primarily due to the lower volume. The Company expects the Aerospace and Defense segment to see
declines in sales and adjusted EBIT in 2010, compared to 2009, as a result of softer
commercial and general aviation market sectors and flat defense market sectors with some
strengthening expected later in the year.
Steel Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
338.1 |
|
|
$ |
134.8 |
|
|
$ |
203.3 |
|
|
|
150.8 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
43.0 |
|
|
$ |
(32.9 |
) |
|
$ |
75.9 |
|
|
|
230.7 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
-24.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
3,710 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
608.4 |
|
|
$ |
383.4 |
|
|
$ |
225.0 |
|
|
|
58.7 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
62.9 |
|
|
$ |
(40.2 |
) |
|
$ |
103.1 |
|
|
|
256.5 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
-10.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
2,080 |
bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales
of the Steel operations reported in accordance with U.S.
GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of
currency exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
338.1 |
|
|
$ |
134.8 |
|
|
$ |
203.3 |
|
|
|
150.8 |
% |
Currency |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
338.0 |
|
|
$ |
134.8 |
|
|
$ |
203.2 |
|
|
|
150.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
608.4 |
|
|
$ |
383.4 |
|
|
$ |
225.0 |
|
|
|
58.7 |
% |
Currency |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
607.9 |
|
|
$ |
383.4 |
|
|
$ |
224.5 |
|
|
|
58.6 |
% |
|
The Steel segments net sales for the second quarter of 2010, excluding the effect of currency-rate
changes, increased 150.7% compared to the second quarter of 2009 primarily due to higher volume of
approximately $135 million, across all market sectors, and higher surcharges of approximately $84
million, partially offset by unfavorable sales mix of approximately $15 million. Surcharges
increased to $94.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 from $11.0 million in the second quarter
of 2009. Surcharges are a pricing mechanism that the Company uses to recover scrap steel, energy
and certain alloy costs, which are derived from published monthly indices. The average scrap index
for the second quarter of 2010 was $468 per ton compared to $199 per ton for the second quarter of
2009. Steel shipments for the second quarter of 2010 were 249,086 tons compared to 111,465 tons
for the second quarter 2009, an increase of 123.5%. The Steel segments average selling price,
including surcharges, was $1,357 per ton for the second quarter of 2010 compared to an average
selling price of $1,210 per ton in the second quarter of 2009. The increase in the average selling
prices was primarily the result of higher surcharges, partially offset
31
by unfavorable sales mix. The higher surcharges were the result of higher market prices for
certain input raw materials, especially scrap steel, nickel and molybdenum.
The Steel segments adjusted EBIT increased $75.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to
the second quarter of 2009 primarily due to higher surcharges of $84 million, the impact of higher
sales volume of approximately $55 million and lower manufacturing costs of approximately $35
million, partially offset by higher material costs of approximately $75 million, the impact of
unfavorable sales mix of approximately $10 million and higher LIFO expense. In the second quarter
of 2010, the Steel segment recognized LIFO expense of $0.3 million compared to LIFO income of $3.8
million in the second quarter of 2009. Raw material costs consumed in the manufacturing process,
including scrap steel, alloys and energy, increased 56% in the second quarter of 2010 over the
comparable period in the prior year to an average cost of $440 per ton.
The Steel segments net sales for the first six months of 2010, excluding the effect of
currency-rate changes, increased 58.6% compared to the first six months of 2009 primarily due to
higher volume of approximately $150 million, driven by the automotive market sector, and higher
surcharges of approximately $106 million, partially offset by unfavorable sales mix of
approximately $35 million. Surcharges increased to $154.4 million in the first six months of 2010
from $48.1 million in the first six months of 2009. The average scrap index for the first six
months of 2010 was $442 per ton compared to $209 per ton for the first six months of 2009. Steel
shipments for the first six months of 2010 were 463,997 tons compared to 314,312 tons for the first
six months 2009, an increase of 47.6%. The Steel segments average selling price, including
surcharges, was $1,311 per ton for the first six months of 2010 compared to an average selling
price of $1,220 per ton in the first six months of 2009. The increase in the average selling
prices was primarily the result of higher surcharges, partially offset by unfavorable sales mix.
The higher surcharges were the result of higher market prices for certain input raw materials,
especially scrap steel, nickel and molybdenum.
The Steel segments adjusted EBIT increased $103.1 million in the first six months of 2010 compared
to the first six months of 2009 primarily due to higher surcharges of $106 million, lower
manufacturing costs of approximately $60 million and the impact of higher sales volume of
approximately $65 million, partially offset by the impact of higher raw materials costs of $70
million, unfavorable sales mix of approximately $25 million and higher LIFO expense. In the first
six months of 2010, the Steel segment recognized LIFO expense of $1 million compared to LIFO income
of $16 million in the first six months of 2009. Raw material costs consumed in the manufacturing
process, including scrap steel, alloys and energy, increased 36% in the first six months of 2010
over the comparable period in the prior year to an average cost of $414 per ton.
The Company expects the Steel segment to see a 70% to 80% increase in sales for the full year 2010,
compared to 2009, due to higher volume and higher surcharges, as scrap steel and alloy prices have
risen substantially from the low levels experienced in 2009. The Company also expects higher
demand across most market sectors, primarily driven by an 80% increase in industrial market sectors
and a 50% increase in automotive market sectors. The Company expects the Steel segments adjusted
EBIT to be significantly higher in 2010, compared to a loss in 2009, primarily due to the higher
sales volume and surcharges. Scrap costs are expected to increase in the short-term from current
levels and then level off, as are alloy and energy costs.
Corporate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
$ |
17.8 |
|
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
% |
Corporate expenses % to net sales |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
$ |
31.6 |
|
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
Corporate expenses % to net sales
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
bps |
|
Corporate expenses increased for the second quarter and the first six
months of 2010, compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2009, as
a result of higher performance-based compensation of approximately $6 million and $10 million, respectively, partially offset by the
impact of restructuring initiatives.
32
The Balance Sheet:
Total assets as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2010 decreased $1.7 million
compared to December 31, 2009. The decrease in 2010 was primarily due to lower plant, property and
equipment, partially offset by higher cash and cash equivalents and higher working capital as a
result of higher volumes.
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
796.2 |
|
|
$ |
755.5 |
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
500.3 |
|
|
|
411.2 |
|
|
|
89.1 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
Inventories, net |
|
|
699.5 |
|
|
|
671.2 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
Other current assets |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
111.3 |
|
|
|
(66.3 |
) |
|
|
(59.6 |
)% |
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
2,114.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,022.5 |
|
|
$ |
91.8 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
Refer to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for a discussion of the increase in cash and cash
equivalents. Accounts receivable, net increased as a result of the higher sales in the second
quarter of 2010 compared to the fourth quarter of 2009, as well as a $10.6 million decrease in the allowance for doubtful accounts. Inventories increased primarily due to
higher volume. The decrease in other current assets is primarily due to a decrease of
approximately $57 million in net income taxes receivable as a result of the current-year provision
for income taxes and a $6.9 million reduction in current investments that matured and were subsequently
converted to cash and cash equivalents. The decrease in the income taxes receivable was partially offset by a $6.5 million
reclassification of the Companys investment in two joint ventures, International Component Supply
LTDA and Endorsia.com, from other non-current assets as these investments are considered assets
held for sale at June 30, 2010. In July 2010, the Company received an income tax refund of $54.3 million.
Property, Plant and Equipment Net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
3,379.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,398.1 |
|
|
$ |
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
Less: Allowances for depreciation |
|
|
(2,115.8 |
) |
|
|
(2,062.9 |
) |
|
|
(52.9 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
Property, plant and equipment net |
|
$ |
1,263.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,335.2 |
|
|
$ |
(71.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
)% |
|
The decrease in property, plant and equipment net in the first half of 2010 was primarily due to
current-year depreciation expense exceeding capital expenditures and the impact of foreign currency
translation.
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
218.3 |
|
|
$ |
221.7 |
|
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
Other intangible assets |
|
|
127.5 |
|
|
|
132.1 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
234.7 |
|
|
|
248.6 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
Other non-current assets |
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
627.3 |
|
|
$ |
649.1 |
|
|
$ |
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
)% |
|
The decrease in other intangible assets was primarily due to current-year amortization. The
decrease in deferred income taxes is primarily due to a reduction in deferred tax assets caused by the
enactment of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (as amended).
33
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
|
$ |
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
(81.0 |
)% |
Accounts payable |
|
|
220.5 |
|
|
|
156.0 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
% |
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
183.4 |
|
|
|
142.5 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
160.6 |
|
|
|
189.3 |
|
|
|
(28.7 |
) |
|
|
(15.2 |
)% |
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(27.6 |
)% |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
590.8 |
|
|
$ |
540.3 |
|
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
The decrease in short-term debt was primarily due to decreased net borrowings by the Companys
foreign subsidiaries under lines of credit due to lower working capital requirements. The increase
in accounts payable was primarily due to higher volumes. The increase in accrued salaries, wages
and benefits was the result of accruals for current-year incentive plans in the first six months of
2010. The decrease in other current liabilities was primarily due to the payout of severance
payments related to 2009 restructuring activities, as well as a reduction in the accrual for a
working capital adjustment related to the sale of the NRB operations.
Non-Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
476.1 |
|
|
$ |
469.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Accrued pension cost |
|
|
568.2 |
|
|
|
690.9 |
|
|
|
(122.7 |
) |
|
|
(17.8 |
)% |
Accrued postretirement benefits cost |
|
|
597.6 |
|
|
|
604.2 |
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
107.9 |
|
|
|
100.4 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
$ |
1,756.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,870.8 |
|
|
$ |
(114.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
)% |
|
The decrease in accrued pension cost was primarily due to the Companys contribution of
approximately $108 million of contributions to its defined benefit plans during the first half of
2010.
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
927.6 |
|
|
$ |
896.6 |
|
|
$ |
31.0 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Earnings invested in the business |
|
|
1,495.8 |
|
|
|
1,402.9 |
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(743.8 |
) |
|
|
(717.1 |
) |
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
Treasury shares |
|
|
(39.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(35.2 |
) |
|
NM |
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
Total Equity |
|
$ |
1,658.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,595.7 |
|
|
$ |
62.6 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
The increase in common stock was primarily due to proceeds received from the exercise of stock
options. Earnings invested in the business increased in the first six months of 2010 by net income
of $114.2 million, partially offset by dividends declared of $21.3 million. The increase in
accumulated other comprehensive loss was primarily due to a foreign currency translation adjustment
of $71.0 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, such as
the Euro and the Chinese yuan. See Foreign Currency for further discussion regarding the impact
of foreign currency translation. This increase was partially offset by the recognition of
prior-year service costs and actuarial losses for defined benefit pension and postretirement
benefit plans and a $14.1 million prior period adjustment related to deferred taxes on
post-retirement prescription drug benefits, specifically the employer subsidy provided by the U.S.
government under Medicare Part D. Refer to Note 13 Income Taxes in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for further discussion on the prior period adjustment. Treasury shares
increased in the second quarter of 2010 as a result of Company repurchasing stock under its 2006
common stock purchase plan.
34
Cash Flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
164.0 |
|
|
$ |
253.4 |
|
|
$ |
(89.4 |
) |
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(37.4 |
) |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
11.8 |
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(49.9 |
) |
|
|
(68.5 |
) |
|
|
18.6 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(36.0 |
) |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
143.7 |
|
|
$ |
(103.0 |
) |
|
Operating activities provided a source of cash of $164.0 million and $253.4 million in the
first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities
was primarily due to higher pension contributions and other postretirement benefit payments as well
as lower cash provided by working capital items, particularly inventories and accounts receivable,
partially offset by higher net income. Pension contributions and other postretirement benefit
payments were $133.6 million for the first six months of 2010, compared to $34.7 million for the
first six months of 2009. Accounts receivable used cash of $103.8 million in the first six months
of 2010 after providing cash of $143.1 million in the first six months of 2009. Inventories used
cash of $45.7 million in the first six months of 2010 after providing cash of $204.1 million in the
first six months of 2009. Accounts receivable and inventories increased in the first six months of
2010 primarily due to higher volumes compared to the first six months of 2009. In addition, the
increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by the collection of retained net receivables
from the sale of the NRB operations of approximately $30 million to $35 million. Accounts payable
and accrued expenses provided cash of $82.9 million in the first six months of 2010 after using
cash of $186.3 million for the first six months of 2009. Net income increased $177.8 million in
the first six months of 2010 compared to the first six months of 2009.
The net cash used by investing activities of $37.4 million for the first six months of 2010
decreased from the same period in 2009 primarily due to a $14.3 million decrease in capital
expenditures in the current year. The Company expects to increase capital expenditures by
approximately 25% in 2010 compared to the 2009 level.
The net cash used by financing activities of $49.9 million in the first six months of
2010 decreased from $68.5 million in the first six months of 2009. The Company reduced its
net borrowings by $18.8 million during the first half of 2010 after reducing its net borrowings by
$42.4 million during the first half of 2009. In addition during the first six months of 2010, the
Company repurchased $29.2 million shares of its common stock, partially offset by net proceeds of
$19.4 million related to stock option exercises.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2010, cash and cash equivalents of $796.2 million exceeded total debt of $493.4
million. At December 31, 2009, cash and cash equivalents of $755.5 million exceeded total debt of
$512.5 million. The net debt to capital ratio was a negative 22.3% and 18.0%, respectively, at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Reconciliation of total debt to net debt and the ratio of net debt to capital:
Net Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
476.1 |
|
|
|
469.2 |
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
493.4 |
|
|
|
512.5 |
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
796.2 |
|
|
|
755.5 |
|
|
Net (cash) debt |
|
$ |
(302.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(243.0 |
) |
|
Ratio of Net Debt to Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net (cash) debt |
|
$ |
(302.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(243.0 |
) |
Shareholders equity |
|
|
1,658.3 |
|
|
|
1,595.7 |
|
|
Net (cash) debt + shareholders equity (capital) |
|
$ |
1,355.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,352.7 |
|
|
Ratio of net debt (cash) to capital |
|
|
(22.3 |
)% |
|
|
(18.0 |
)% |
|
35
The Company presents net (cash) debt because it believes net (cash) debt is more representative
of the Companys financial position.
At June 30, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its 364-day Asset Securitization
Agreement (Asset Securitization), which provides for borrowings up to $100 million, subject to
certain borrowing base limitations, and is secured by certain domestic trade receivables of the
Company. The Company had full availability under the Asset Securitization at June 30, 2010.
At June 30, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its $500 million Senior Credit
Facility, but had letters of credit outstanding totaling $32.2 million, which reduced the
availability under the Senior Credit Facility to $467.8 million. The Senior Credit Facility
matures on July 10, 2012. Under the Senior Credit Facility, the Company has three financial
covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio, a consolidated interest coverage ratio and a consolidated
minimum tangible net worth test. At June 30, 2010, the Company was in full compliance with the
covenants under the Senior Credit Facility and its other debt agreements. The maximum consolidated
leverage ratio permitted under the Senior Credit Facility is 3.25 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2010, the
Companys consolidated leverage ratio was 0.9 to 1.0. The minimum consolidated interest coverage
ratio permitted under the Senior Credit Facility is 4.0 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2010, the Companys
consolidated interest coverage ratio was 13.5 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2010, the Companys
consolidated tangible net worth exceeded the minimum required amount by over $350 million. Refer
to Note 6 Financing Arrangements in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
further discussion.
The interest rate under the Senior Credit Facility is based on the Companys consolidated leverage
ratio. In addition, the Company pays a facility fee based on the consolidated leverage ratio
multiplied by the aggregate commitments of all of the lenders under this agreement. Financing
costs on the Senior Credit Facility are being amortized over the life of the new agreement and are
expected to result in approximately $2.9 million in annual interest expense.
Other sources of liquidity include lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries, which provide for borrowings up to $307.7 million. The majority of these lines are
uncommitted. At June 30, 2010, the Company had borrowings outstanding of $17.5 million, which
reduced the availability under these facilities to $290.2 million.
The Company expects that any cash requirements in excess of cash on hand and cash generated from
operating activities will be met by the committed funds available under its Asset Securitization
and the Senior Credit Facility. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its
obligations through at least the term of the Senior Credit Facility.
The Company expects to remain in compliance with its debt covenants. However, the Company may need
to limit its borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility or other facilities from time to time in order to remain in
compliance. As of June 30, 2010, the Company could have borrowed the full amounts available under
the Senior Credit Facility and Asset Securitization Agreement and would have remained in
full compliance with its debt covenants.
In September 2009, the Company issued $250 million of fixed-rated unsecured Senior Notes. These
Senior Notes, which mature in September 2014, bear interest at 6.0% per annum. The net proceeds
from the sale of the Senior Notes were used in December 2009 to redeem fixed-rate unsecured Senior
Notes maturing in February 2010.
The Company expects to continue to generate cash from operations as the Company experiences
improved margins in 2010. The Company also expects to make approximately $135
million in pension contributions in 2010, compared to $65 million in 2009. As a result, the Company expects to generate cash from operating
activities in excess of $380 million in 2010. In addition, the Company expects to increase capital expenditures by approximately 25%
in 2010, compared to 2009.
Financing Obligations and Other Commitments
During the first six months of 2010, the Company made cash contributions of approximately $108
million to its global defined benefit pension plans, $100 million of which was discretionary. The
Company currently expects to make contributions to its global defined benefit pension plans
totaling approximately $135 million in 2010. The Company may consider making additional
discretionary contributions during the second half of 2010. Returns for the Companys global
defined benefit pension plan assets in 2009 were significantly above the expected rate of return
assumption of 8.75 percent due to broad increases in global equity markets. These favorable
returns positively impacted the funded status of the plans at the end of 2009 and are expected to
result in lower pension expense and required pension contributions over the next several years.
However, the impact of these favorable returns will be offset by the impact of the lower discount
rate for expense in 2010, compared to 2009. Returns for the Companys U.S. defined benefit plan
pension assets for the first six months of 2010 were approximately 0.3%. Returns below the
Companys expected long-term rate of return of 8.75% may impact the Companys future pension
expense and contributions. A return of 5.00 percentage points below the expected long-term rate of return of 8.75% in
2010 may increase pension expense for 2011 by approximately $3.5
million. Further, a 0.25 percentage point reduction in the expected long-term rate of return would
increase pension expense by approximately $5 million per year.
36
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company purchased 500,000 shares of common stock for
approximately $15 million
under the Companys 2006 common stock purchase plan. During the first half of 2010, the Company
purchased 1,000,000 shares of common stock for approximately $29 million under this plan. This
plan authorizes the Company to buy, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, up
to four million shares of common stock, which are to be held as treasury shares and used for
specified purposes, up to an aggregate amount of $180 million. The authorization expires on December 31,
2012.
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or other
persons.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new accounting guidance that
amends the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest
entities. The implementation of the new accounting guidance related to variable interest entities,
effective January 1, 2010, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations
and financial condition.
Critical Accounting Policy and Estimates:
The Companys financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
periods presented. The Company reviews its critical accounting policies throughout the year and
believes the following critical policy affects managements significant judgments and estimates
used in preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with
the critical accounting policies and estimates included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010.
Inventory:
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with approximately 48% valued by the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method and the remaining 52% valued by the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method. The majority of the Companys domestic inventories are valued by the LIFO method and all
of the Companys international (outside the United States) inventories are valued by the FIFO
method. An actual valuation of the inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of
each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO
calculations must be based on managements estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and
costs. Because these are subject to many factors beyond managements control, annual results may
differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
The Company recognized $6.6 million in LIFO expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to LIFO income of $13.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Based on current
expectations of inventory levels and costs, the Company expects to recognize approximately $12
million in LIFO expense for the year ended December 31, 2010. The expected increase in the LIFO
reserve for 2010 is a result of higher costs, especially scrap steel costs, as well as higher
inventory quantities. A 1.0% increase in costs would increase the current LIFO expense estimate
for 2010 by $4.3 million. A 1.0% increase in inventory quantities would increase the current LIFO
expense estimate for 2010 by $0.2 million.
Other Matters:
Foreign Currency:
Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries are translated at the rate of exchange in effect on the
balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing
during the quarter. Related translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from
transactions are included in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Foreign currency exchange gains included in the Companys operating results for the second quarter
of 2010 were $6.9 million, compared to a loss of $0.8 million during the second quarter of 2009.
Foreign currency exchange gains included in the Companys operating results for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 were $5.3 million, compared to a gain of $5.4 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a negative
non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of $71.0 million that decreased shareholders
equity, compared to a positive non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of $22.5 million
that increased shareholders equity for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The foreign currency
translation adjustments for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were negatively impacted by the
strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies such as the Euro and the Chinese
yuan.
Quarterly Dividend:
On August 3, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 per
share. The dividend will be paid on September 2, 2010 to shareholders of record as of August 20,
2010. This will be the 353rd consecutive dividend paid on the common stock of the
Company.
37
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements set forth in this document (including the Companys forecasts, beliefs and
expectations) that are not historical in nature are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, the Managements
Discussion and Analysis contains numerous forward-looking statements. The Company cautions readers
that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking
statements made by or on behalf of the Company due to a variety of important factors, such as:
a) |
|
continued weakness in world economic conditions, including additional adverse effects from
the global economic slowdown, terrorism or hostilities. This includes, but is not limited to,
political risks associated with the potential instability of governments and legal systems in
countries in which the Company or its customers conduct business, and changes in currency
valuations; |
|
b) |
|
the effects of fluctuations in customer demand on sales, product mix and prices in the
industries in which the Company operates. This includes the ability of the Company to respond
to the rapid changes in customer demand, the effects of customer bankruptcies or liquidations,
the impact of changes in industrial business cycles and whether conditions of fair trade
continue in the U.S. markets; |
|
c) |
|
competitive factors, including changes in market penetration, increasing price competition by
existing or new foreign and domestic competitors, the introduction of new products by existing
and new competitors and new technology that may impact the way the Companys products are sold
or distributed; |
|
d) |
|
changes in operating costs. This includes: the effect of changes in the Companys
manufacturing processes; changes in costs associated with varying levels of operations and
manufacturing capacity; higher cost and availability of raw materials and energy; the
Companys ability to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in raw materials and energy costs and
the operation of the Companys surcharge mechanism; changes in the expected costs associated
with product warranty claims; changes resulting from inventory management and cost reduction
initiatives and different levels of customer demands; the effects of unplanned work stoppages;
and changes in the cost of labor and benefits; |
|
e) |
|
the success of the Companys operating plans, including its ability to achieve the benefits
from its ongoing continuous improvement and rationalization programs; the ability of acquired
companies to achieve satisfactory operating results; and the Companys ability to maintain
appropriate relations with unions that represent Company associates in certain locations in
order to avoid disruptions of business; |
|
f) |
|
unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments. This includes, but is not limited to,
claims or problems related to intellectual property, product liability or warranty,
environmental issues, and taxes; |
|
g) |
|
changes in worldwide financial markets, including availability of financing and interest
rates to the extent they affect the Companys ability to raise capital or increase the
Companys cost of funds, have an impact on the overall performance of the Companys pension
fund investments and/or cause changes in the global economy and financial markets which affect
customer demand and the ability of customers to obtain financing to purchase the Companys
products or equipment which contains the Companys products; and |
|
h) |
|
those items identified under Item 1A. Risk Factors in this document, in the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009. |
Additional risks relating to the Companys business, the industries in which the Company operates
or the Companys common stock may be described from time to time in the Companys filings with the
SEC. All of these risk factors are difficult to predict, are subject to material uncertainties
that may affect actual results and may be beyond the Companys control.
Except as required by the federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
38
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
|
Refer to information appearing under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q. Furthermore, a discussion
of market risk exposures is included in Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure about Market Risk, of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. There have been no material changes in reported market risk since the
inclusion of this discussion in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K referenced above. |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
|
(a) |
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
|
|
|
|
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the Companys principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)).
Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. |
|
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
|
|
|
|
During the Companys most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. |
39
Part II. Other Information
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected
to have a materially adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and our Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 include a detailed discussion of our risk
factors. There have been no material changes to the risk factors included the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and its Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
|
Issuer of Purchases of Common Stock |
|
|
The following table provides information about purchases by the Company during the quarter
ended June 30, 2010 of its common stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
Maximum number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
shares purchased as |
|
of shares that may |
|
|
Total number |
|
price paid |
|
part of publicly |
|
yet be purchased |
|
|
of shares |
|
per |
|
announced plans or |
|
under the plans or |
Period |
|
purchased(1) |
|
share(2) |
|
programs |
|
programs(3) |
|
4/1/10-4/30/10 |
|
|
8,565 |
|
|
$ |
33.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
5/1/10-5/31/10 |
|
|
556,078 |
|
|
|
30.84 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
6/1/10-6/30/10 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
27.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
564,726 |
|
|
$ |
30.87 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The shares purchased in April, 56,078 of the shares purchased in May, and the shares
purchased in June represent shares of the Companys common stock that are owned and
tendered by employees to exercise stock options, and to satisfy withholding obligations in
connection with the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted shares. |
|
(2) |
|
For shares tendered in connection with the vesting of restricted shares, the average
price paid per share is an average calculated using the daily high and low of the
Companys common stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange at the time of vesting.
For shares tendered in connection with the exercise of stock options, the price paid is the
real-time trading stock price at the time the options are exercised. |
|
(3) |
|
Pursuant to the Companys 2006 common stock purchase plan, the Company may purchase
up to four million shares of common stock at an amount not to exceed $180 million in the
aggregate. The Company may purchase shares under its 2006 common stock purchase plan until
December 31, 2012. The Company may purchase shares from time to time in open market
purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The Company may make all or part of the
purchases pursuant to accelerated share repurchases or Rule 10b5-1 plans. |
40
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended Regulations of The Timken Company, as adopted by the Shareholders at
the Annual Meeting held on May 11, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
The Timken Company Senior Executive Management Performance Plan, as amended and
restated, was filed on May 12, 2010 with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169), and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
12
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of James W. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Glenn A. Eisenberg, Executive Vice President Finance and
Administration (principal financial officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certifications of James W. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) and Glenn A. Eisenberg, Executive Vice President
Finance and Administration (principal financial officer) of The Timken Company,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101
|
|
Financial statements from the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Timken
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 5, 2010, formatted in
XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets,
(iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text. |
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
|
|
Date August 5, 2010 |
By |
/s/ James W. Griffith
|
|
|
|
James W. Griffith |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date August 5, 2010 |
By |
/s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg
|
|
|
|
Glenn A. Eisenberg |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President Finance
and Administration (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
42