e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
February 24, 2006
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from
to
|
Commission file number 1-11098
SOLECTRON CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-2447045
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
847 Gibraltar Drive
Milpitas, California 95035
(Address of principal executive
offices including zip code)
(408) 957-8500
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date.
At March 30, 2006, 914,430,596 shares of Common Stock
of the Registrant were outstanding (including approximately
20.5 million shares of Solectron Global Services Canada,
Inc., which are exchangeable on a
one-to-one
basis for the Registrants common stock)
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION
INDEX TO
FORM 10-Q
2
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
August 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments*
|
|
$
|
1,526.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,722.3
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
1,177.7
|
|
|
|
1,180.7
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,346.1
|
|
|
|
1,108.5
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
233.2
|
|
|
|
211.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
4,283.8
|
|
|
|
4,222.9
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
681.7
|
|
|
|
666.3
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
147.6
|
|
|
|
148.8
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
221.8
|
|
|
|
219.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,334.9
|
|
|
$
|
5,257.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
228.5
|
|
|
$
|
165.7
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,430.3
|
|
|
|
1,371.2
|
|
Accrued employee compensation
|
|
|
143.3
|
|
|
|
167.0
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
472.1
|
|
|
|
509.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,274.2
|
|
|
|
2,213.5
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
628.0
|
|
|
|
540.9
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
79.6
|
|
|
|
59.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,981.8
|
|
|
$
|
2,813.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
7,619.6
|
|
|
|
7,774.1
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(5,152.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5,206.5
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(115.4
|
)
|
|
|
(124.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,353.1
|
|
|
|
2,444.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,334.9
|
|
|
$
|
5,257.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes $31.2 million and $13.2 million of restricted
cash balances as of February 28, 2006 and August 31,
2005, respectively, and $15.0 million and
$26.3 million of short term investments as of
February 28, 2006 and August 31, 2005, respectively. |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,499.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,756.0
|
|
|
$
|
4,956.0
|
|
|
$
|
5,446.6
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,370.6
|
|
|
|
2,598.1
|
|
|
|
4,701.4
|
|
|
|
5,133.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
129.0
|
|
|
|
157.9
|
|
|
|
254.6
|
|
|
|
313.4
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
104.3
|
|
|
|
104.7
|
|
|
|
211.7
|
|
|
|
200.3
|
|
Restructuring and impairment costs
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
69.2
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
(33.0
|
)
|
Other (expense)
income net
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income from continuing
operations before income taxes
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
|
$
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
37.3
|
|
|
$
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
13.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
|
$
|
13.3
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
54.4
|
|
|
$
|
56.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute basic net
income per share
|
|
|
908.8
|
|
|
|
977.1
|
|
|
|
917.3
|
|
|
|
966.7
|
|
Shares used to compute diluted net
income per share
|
|
|
909.7
|
|
|
|
977.1
|
|
|
|
918.1
|
|
|
|
970.6
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
54.4
|
|
|
$
|
56.0
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments, net
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
39.0
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
63.4
|
|
|
$
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated unrealized foreign currency translation losses were
$105.2 million at February 28, 2006 and
$114.2 million at August 31, 2005. Foreign currency
translation adjustments consist of adjustments to consolidate
subsidiaries that use the local currency as their functional
currency and transaction gains and losses related to
intercompany dollar-denominated debt that is not expected to be
repaid in the foreseeable future.
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
54.4
|
|
|
$
|
56.0
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(17.1
|
)
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
87.5
|
|
|
|
101.3
|
|
Impairment of property, equipment
and other long-term assets, net
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
|
Gain on disposal of property and
equipment
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowance
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
161.3
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(237.4
|
)
|
|
|
213.9
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(27.4
|
)
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
(55.5
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|
|
(45.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(70.0
|
)
|
|
|
476.6
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
(78.2
|
)
|
|
|
470.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of available for sale
securities
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(18.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
Settlement of receivable related to
synthetic lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(109.7
|
)
|
|
|
(66.1
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
Dispositions and receipts from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(103.1
|
)
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(86.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds (repayment) of bank
lines of credit and other debt arrangements
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(16.5
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net
|
|
|
147.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lyon repurchase
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Common stock repurchase
|
|
|
(180.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
|
Net proceeds from stock issued
under option and employee purchase plans
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(29.1
|
)
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(202.2
|
)
|
|
|
524.6
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
continuing operations at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,682.8
|
|
|
|
1,412.7
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
discontinued operations at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
1,682.8
|
|
|
|
1,412.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
continuing operations at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,480.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,937.3
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
discontinued operations at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents at
end of period
|
|
$
|
1,480.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,937.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 1
|
Basis of
Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying financial data as of February 28, 2006 and
for the three and six months ended February 28, 2006 and
2005 has been prepared by Solectron, without audit, pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations. The August 31, 2005
condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited
consolidated financial statements, but does not include all
disclosures required by generally accepted accounting
principles. However, Solectron believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the
notes thereto included in Solectrons Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005.
Solectrons second quarters of fiscal 2006 and 2005 ended
on February 24, 2006 and February 25, 2005,
respectively. Solectrons fiscal year 2005 ended on
August 26, 2005. For clarity of presentation, Solectron has
indicated its second quarter as having ended on February 28 and
its fiscal year as having ended on August 31.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include
normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present a fair
consolidated statement of financial position as of
February 28, 2006, the results of operations, comprehensive
income and cash flows for the six months ended February 28,
2006 and 2005 have been made. The consolidated results of
operations for the three and six months ended February 28,
2006 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for
the full fiscal year or any future periods.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Research
and Development Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expense includes
$7.8 million and $15.7 million of research and
development expenses for the three and six months ended
February 28, 2006, respectively, and $8.4 million and
$15.2 million for the three and six months ended
February 28, 2005, respectively.
Restricted
Cash
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, Solectron elected to
put in place a line of credit for the issuance of standby
letters of credit. The letters of credit are principally related
to self-insurance for workers compensation liability coverage.
These standby letters of credit were previously issued under
Solectrons revolving credit facility. Solectron opted to
post cash collateral totaling 105% of the standby letter of
credit balances in order to reduce annual issuance commissions
of the standby letters of credit. Total cash collateral of
$18 million at February 28, 2006, is classified as
restricted cash and cash equivalents in the condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Solectron also has
$13.2 million of restricted cash in connection with its
synthetic leases. See also
Note 8 Commitments and
Contingencies for a discussion of these synthetic leases.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, as an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting
for Asset Retirement Obligations (FASB No. 143). This
7
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
interpretation clarifies that the term conditional asset
retirement obligation as used in FASB No. 143, refers to a
legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in
which the timing
and/or
method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may
or may not be within the control of the entity. The obligation
to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even
though uncertainly exists about the timing
and/or
method of settlement. Accordingly, an entity is required to
recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset
retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be
reasonably estimated. This interpretation also clarifies when an
entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate
the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is
effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2005. The Company is currently assessing the
impact of the adoption of FIN 47.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to
conform to the current period presentation.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
Revision
of Statement of Cash Flows
|
Solectron has revised its statements of cash flows for the six
months ended February 28, 2006 and February 28, 2005,
respectively, to present cash flows related to discontinued
operations consistent with the requirements of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement
No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. This revision
includes beginning the indirect method of determining cash flows
from operating activities with net income (loss) rather than net
income (loss) from continuing operations. In addition, the
operating, financing and investing cash flows of discontinued
operations have been separately presented within the body of the
statements of cash flows which in prior periods were reported on
a consolidated basis as a single amount. Solectron intends to
utilize this revised presentation in all future annual and
quarterly filings. The following table presents revised summary
cash flow information for each of the three most recently
completed fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
August 31
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
(177.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,452.6
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Earnings) loss from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
(85.0
|
)
|
|
|
443.7
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
193.3
|
|
|
|
276.3
|
|
|
|
330.3
|
|
Loss (gain) on retirement of debt
and interest rate swaps
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
72.1
|
|
|
|
(39.4
|
)
|
Deferred tax charge
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
528.9
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and
intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
1,792.0
|
|
Loss on disposal and impairment of
property and equipment, net
|
|
|
46.6
|
|
|
|
60.2
|
|
|
|
157.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
8
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
August 31
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowance
|
|
|
362.9
|
|
|
|
(144.3
|
)
|
|
|
123.4
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
348.5
|
|
|
|
(134.1
|
)
|
|
|
420.4
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
106.9
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(53.6
|
)
|
|
|
150.3
|
|
|
|
(132.0
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
(69.0
|
)
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
947.3
|
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
|
281.0
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
109.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
|
969.7
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
390.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
44.5
|
|
|
|
169.8
|
|
Sales and maturities of short-term
investments
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
252.5
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(28.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56.1
|
)
|
Settlement of loan receivable
related to synthetic lease
|
|
|
31.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(42.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.3
|
)
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(150.4
|
)
|
|
|
(149.6
|
)
|
|
|
(124.6
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
68.9
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
Dispositions and receipts from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
38.9
|
|
|
|
505.6
|
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
Supply agreement and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(112.2
|
)
|
|
|
497.1
|
|
|
|
384.8
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
466.3
|
|
|
|
(112.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
|
|
(95.7
|
)
|
|
|
963.4
|
|
|
|
272.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
August 31
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds used for ACES early
settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayment of bank lines of
credit and other debt arrangements
|
|
|
(23.8
|
)
|
|
|
(50.5
|
)
|
|
|
(85.0
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of ACES and
Senior Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments made to redeem ACES and
Senior Notes
|
|
|
(544.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (costs) proceeds to settle
interest rate swap
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of LYONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(950.2
|
)
|
|
|
(967.5
|
)
|
Common stock repurchase
|
|
|
(71.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
77.7
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(570.0
|
)
|
|
|
(510.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1,016.3
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(38.9
|
)
|
|
|
(507.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(608.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1,017.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,022.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
270.1
|
|
|
|
(45.4
|
)
|
|
|
(323.8
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
continuing operations at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,412.7
|
|
|
|
1,425.3
|
|
|
|
1,742.9
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
discontinued operations at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
1,412.7
|
|
|
|
1,458.1
|
|
|
|
1,781.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
continuing operations at end of period
|
|
|
1,682.8
|
|
|
|
1,412.7
|
|
|
|
1,425.3
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
discontinued operations at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents at
end of period
|
|
$
|
1,682.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,412.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,458.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (received) during the
period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
(199.6
|
)
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
59.0
|
|
|
$
|
100.8
|
|
|
$
|
133.4
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early settlement of ACES for stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,006.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued stock repurchase
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 3
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
Effective September 1, 2005, Solectron began recording
compensation expense associated with stock options and other
forms of equity compensation in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123-R,
Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123R) as
interpreted by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107.
Prior to September 1, 2005, the Company accounted for stock
options according to the provisions of Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, and
therefore no related compensation expense was recorded for
awards granted with no intrinsic value. Solectron adopted the
modified prospective transition method provided for under
SFAS 123R, and consequently has not
10
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
retroactively adjusted results from prior periods. Under this
transition method, compensation cost associated with stock
options now includes 1) quarterly amortization related to
the remaining unvested portion of all stock option awards
granted prior to September 1, 2005, based on the grant date
fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions
of SFAS 123; and 2) quarterly amortization related to
all stock option awards granted subsequent to September 1,
2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS 123R. In addition, Solectron
records expense over the offering period and the vesting term,
respectively, in connection with 1) shares issued under its
employee stock purchase plan and 2) restricted stock and
discounted stock options. The compensation expense for stock
based compensation awards includes an estimate for forfeitures
and is recognized over the expected term of the options using
the straight-line method. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS 123R, Solectrons earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes, earnings from continuing
operations, and net earnings for the three-month and six-month
period ended February 28, 2006, were $3.8 million and
$7.6 million lower respectively, than under
Solectrons previous accounting method for share-based
compensation. Basic and diluted net earnings per common share
for the quarter ended February 28, 2006, were not impacted
by the change in accounting method. Prior to our adoption of
SFAS 123R, benefits of tax deductions in excess of
recognized compensation costs were reported as operating cash
flows. SFAS 123R requires that they be recorded as a
financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid.
For the quarter ended February 28, 2006, no excess tax
benefits were generated from option exercises. The Company
evaluated the need to record a cumulative effect adjustment for
estimated forfeitures upon the adoption of SFAS 123R and
determined the amount to be immaterial. The company is in the
process of computing the excess tax benefits in additional
paid-in capital as of the date of adoption of SFAS 123R.
This analysis is not expected to result in a material change to
Solectrons financial statements.
Total stock compensation expense for the three months ended
February 28, 2006, of $5.4 million was included in
cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expense in
the amounts of $1.8 million and $3.6 million,
respectively. Total stock compensation expense for the six
months ended February 28, 2006, of $10.2 million was
included in cost of sales and selling, general and
administrative expense in the amounts of $3.6 million and
$6.6 million, respectively. Total stock compensation
expense for the three months and six months ended
February 28, 2005, of $0.6 million and
$1.5 million, respectively, was included in selling,
general, and administrative expense.
For stock options granted prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123R, if compensation expense for the Companys
various stock option plans had been determined based upon
estimated fair values at the grant dates in accordance with
SFAS 123, the Companys pro forma net income (loss),
and basic and diluted income (loss) per share would have been as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2005
|
|
|
February 28, 2005
|
|
|
Net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
56.0
|
|
Fair value-based expense, net of
tax
|
|
$
|
(43.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
(45.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
11
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Stock
Options
Solectrons stock option plans provide for grants of
options to employees to purchase common stock at the fair market
value of such shares on the grant date. The options vest monthly
over a four-year period beginning on the grant date. The term of
the options is seven years for options granted between
January 12, 1994 and September 20, 2001, and ten years
for options granted thereafter. Options assumed under past
acquisitions generally vest over periods ranging from
immediately to five years from the original grant date and have
terms ranging from two to ten years.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the
assumptions noted in the following table. The expected life of
options is based on observed historical exercise patterns.
Groups of employees that have similar historical exercise
patterns have been considered separately for valuation purposes.
The expected volatility of stock options is based upon equal
weightings of the historical volatility of Solectron stock and,
for fiscal periods in which there is sufficient trading volume
in options on Solectrons stock, the implied volatility of
traded options on Solectron stock having a life of more than six
months. The expected volatility of Employee Share Purchase Plan
shares is based on the implied volatility of traded options on
the Companys stock in periods in which there is sufficient
trading volume in those options. Otherwise, historical
volatility is utilized. The risk free interest rate is based on
the implied yield on a U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issue with
a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option. The
dividend yield reflects that Solectron has not paid any cash
dividends since inception and does not intend to pay any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
February 28
|
Stock Options
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
59%
|
|
69%
|
|
52%-59%
|
|
70%
|
Dividends Yield
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
Expected life
|
|
4.32 years
|
|
3.9 years
|
|
4.32 years to 4.91 years
|
|
3.9 years
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
4.35%
|
|
3.54%
|
|
4.26% to 4.35%
|
|
3.43%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
February 28
|
Employee Stock Purchase
Plan
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Weighted-average volatility
|
|
30%
|
|
39%
|
|
30%-44%
|
|
40%
|
Dividends Yield
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
Expected life
|
|
6 months
|
|
6 months
|
|
6 months
|
|
6 months
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
4.43%
|
|
2.68%
|
|
3.94%-4.43%
|
|
2.50%
|
The Company has recorded $2.8 million and $5.9 million
of compensation expenses relative to stock options (other than
discounted stock options) for the three-month and six-month
periods ended February 28, 2006 in accordance with
SFAS 123R. As of February 28, 2006, there was
$21.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs
related to stock options. These costs are expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
12
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A summary of stock option activity under the plans for the
three-months and six-months ended February 28, 2006 is
presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance, September 1, 2005
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
$
|
9.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 30, 2005
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
$
|
9.57
|
|
|
|
6.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, November 30, 2005
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.34
|
|
|
|
6.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 30, 2005
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
$
|
9.57
|
|
|
|
6.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, February 28, 2006
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
|
$
|
9.41
|
|
|
|
6.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, February 28, 2006
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
$
|
11.09
|
|
|
|
6.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during
the three months and six months ended February 28, 2006,
was $1.90 and $1.88, respectively. The total intrinsic value of
stock options exercised during the three months and six months
ended February 28, 2006, was $.03 million and
$.03 million, respectively.
At February 28, 2006, an aggregate of 60.9 million
shares were authorized for future issuance under our stock
plans, which cover stock options, Employee Stock Purchase Plans,
Restricted Stock Awards and Discounted Stock Options. A total of
49.9 million shares of common stock were available for
grant under Solectrons stock option plans as of
February 28, 2006. Awards that expire or are cancelled
without delivery of shares generally become available for
issuance under the plans.
An initial option is granted to each new outside member of
Solectrons Board of Directors to purchase
20,000 shares of common stock at the fair value on the date
of the grant. On December 1 of each year, each outside
member is granted an additional option to purchase
20,000 shares of common stock at the fair market value on
such date. These options vest over one year and have a term of
seven years.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Under Solectrons Employee Stock Purchase Plan, employees
meeting specific employment qualifications are eligible to
participate and can purchase shares semi-annually through
payroll deductions at the lower of 85% of the fair market value
of the stock at the commencement or end of the offering period.
The Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to purchase common
stock through payroll deductions for up to 10% of qualified
compensation. We have treated the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
as a compensatory plan. The Company has recorded compensation
expense relative to the Purchase Plan in the three-month and
six-month periods ended February 28, 2006 of
$1 million and $1.7 million, respectively.
Restricted
Stock Awards and Discounted Stock Options
During fiscal 2003, Solectron issued restricted stock awards of
1.4 million shares of common stock to certain eligible
executives at a purchase price of $0.001 per share. These
restricted shares are not transferable until fully vested and
are subject to the Company Repurchase Option for all unvested
shares upon certain early termination events and also subject to
accelerated vesting in certain circumstances. Compensation
expense computed under the
13
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
fair value method for the three and six months ended
February 28, 2006, is being amortized over the vesting
period and was $0.1 million and $0.2 million,
respectively. Compensation expense computed under the intrinsic
value method for the three and six months ended
February 28, 2005, is being amortized over the vesting
period and was $0.3 million and $0.9 million,
respectively.
During fiscal 2005 and 2004, Solectron also issued discounted
stock options of 1.5 million and 0.7 million shares,
respectively, to certain eligible executives and employees at a
price below the market value on the day of the stock option
grant. During the six month period ended February 28, 2006,
an additional 4.2 million discounted options were granted
to certain eligible employees. Compensation expense under the
fair value method for the three months and six months ended
February 28, 2006, is being amortized over the vesting
period and was $1.5 million and $2.3 million,
respectively. Compensation expense under the intrinsic value
method for the three months and six months ended
February 28, 2005, was $0.3 million and
$0.5 million, respectively. For compensation expense
purposes, the intrinsic value of restricted stock awards and
discounted stock options equals the fair market value of these
awards.
The weighted-average fair value of the discounted stock options
granted in the three-month and six-month period ended
February 28, 2006 was $3.73 and $3.79, respectively. At
February 28, 2006, unrecognized costs related to restricted
stock awards and discounted stock options totaled approximately
$19.4 million and is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.8 years. The total fair value
of restricted stock and discounted stock options vested was zero
during the three months and six months ended February 28,
2006.
Pro Forma
Net Loss and Assumptions for Fiscal Years 2005 and
2004
The table below sets out the pro forma amounts of net loss and
net loss per share that would have resulted for fiscal years
2005 and 2004, if Solectron accounted for its employee stock
plans under the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per-share
data)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as reported
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
(177.4
|
)
|
Stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value method, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
(58.7
|
)
|
|
|
(60.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(55.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(237.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and
diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Basic and
diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
Stock based employee compensation expense determined under the
fair value method, net of related tax effects, included zero and
$6.5 million of expense relating to discontinued operations
during fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively.
14
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
For purposes of computing pro forma net loss, the fair value of
each option grant and employee stock purchase plan purchase
right was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The assumptions used to value the option
grants and purchase rights are stated below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life of options
|
|
4.5 years
|
|
3.9 years
|
Volatility
|
|
57%
|
|
75%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
3.79%
|
|
2.30% to 3.06%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
Employee Stock Purchase
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life of purchase right
|
|
6 months
|
|
6 months
|
Volatility
|
|
37%
|
|
77%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.90%
|
|
1.00% to 1.70%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
|
|
NOTE 4
|
Stock
Repurchase
|
On July 22, 2005, Solectrons board of directors
authorized a $250 million stock repurchase program. During
the first fiscal quarter of 2006, Solectron repurchased and
retired 46.6 million shares of its common stock at an
average price of $3.87 for approximately $180.4 million. In
October 2005, Solectron completed the stock repurchase program.
Solectron repurchased and retired a total of 63.6 million
shares for approximately $250.0 million under this program.
On November 1, 2005, Solectron announced that the
Companys Board of Directors had approved a new stock
repurchase program whereby the Company is authorized to
repurchase up to an additional $250 million of the
Companys common stock. Solectron commenced this second
$250 million repurchase program at the end of the quarter
ended February 28, 2006. However, no repurchase
transactions were settled during the quarter.
Inventories related to continuing operations as of
February 28, 2006 and August 31, 2005, consisted of
the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
August 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
985.2
|
|
|
$
|
771.0
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
168.7
|
|
|
|
152.8
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
192.2
|
|
|
|
184.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,346.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,108.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6
|
Accounts
Receivable, Net
|
Accounts receivable, net related to continuing operations as of
February 28, 2006 and August 31, 2005 consisted
of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
August 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
$
|
1,194.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,203.0
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful
accounts
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable, net
|
|
$
|
1,177.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,180.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 7
|
Property
and Equipment, Net
|
Property and equipment, net related to continuing operations as
of February 28, 2006 and August 31, 2005 consisted of
the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
August 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Original Cost
|
|
$
|
1,843.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,818.3
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,161.3
|
|
|
|
1,152.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
681.7
|
|
|
$
|
666.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Synthetic
Leases
Solectron has synthetic lease agreements relating to three
manufacturing sites. The synthetic leases have expiration dates
in August 2007. At the end of the lease terms, Solectron has an
option, subject to certain conditions, to purchase or to cause a
third party to purchase the facilities subject to the synthetic
leases for the Termination Value, which approximates
the lessors original cost for each facility, or may market
the property to a third party at a different price. Solectron is
entitled to any proceeds from a sale of the properties to third
parties in excess of the Termination Value and is liable to the
lessor for any shortfall not to exceed 85% of the Termination
Value. Solectron has provided loans to the lessor equaling
approximately 85% of the Termination Value for each synthetic
lease. These loans are repayable solely from the sale of the
properties to third parties in the future, are subordinated to
the amounts payable to the lessor at the end of the synthetic
leases, and may be credited against the Termination Values
payable if Solectron purchases the properties. The approximate
aggregate Termination Values and loan amounts were
$87.7 million and $74.5 million, respectively, as of
February 28, 2006.
In addition, cash collateral of $13.2 million, an amount
equal to the difference between the aggregate Termination Values
and the loan amounts, is pledged as collateral. Each synthetic
lease agreement contains various affirmative covenants. A
default under a lease, including violation of these covenants,
may accelerate the termination date of the arrangement.
Solectron was in compliance with all applicable covenants as of
February 28, 2006. Monthly lease payments are generally
based on the Termination Value and
30-day LIBOR
index (4.57% as of February 28, 2006) plus an
interest-rate margin, which may vary depending upon
Solectrons Moodys Investors Services and
Standard and Poors ratings, and are allocated between the
lessor and Solectron based on the proportion of the loan amount
to the Termination Value for each synthetic lease.
During fiscal 2004, Solectron determined that it is probable
that the expected fair value of the properties under the
synthetic lease agreements will be less than the Termination
Value at the end of the lease terms by approximately
$13.5 million. The $13.5 million is being accreted
over the remaining lease terms. As of February 28, 2006,
Solectron had accreted $7.3 million.
Solectron accounts for these synthetic lease arrangements as
operating leases in accordance with SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, as amended. Solectrons
loans to the lessor and cash collateral are included in other
assets and restricted cash and cash equivalents, respectively,
in the consolidated balance sheets.
16
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Future
Minimum Lease Obligations
Future minimum payments for operating lease obligations related
to facilities in use, including the synthetic leases discussed
above, are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-
|
|
|
Q3 07-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Q4 07
|
|
|
FY08
|
|
|
FY09
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
FY11
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Operating lease
|
|
$
|
142.1
|
|
|
$
|
34.2
|
|
|
$
|
20.2
|
|
|
$
|
21.3
|
|
|
$
|
16.4
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
13.5
|
|
|
$
|
22.0
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
Solectron is from time to time involved in various litigation
and legal matters, including the one described below.
Solectron has settled the previously reported shareholder class
action lawsuit entitled Abrams v. Solectron Corporation
et al., Case
No. C-03-0986
CRB, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California, on terms not considered to be material
to Solectron. Court approval of the settlement terms was
obtained on March 3, 2006.
|
|
NOTE 9
|
Segment
Information and Geographic Information
|
SFAS No. 131 Disclosure about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information established standards
for reporting information about operating segments in annual
consolidated financial statements and requires selected
information about operating segments in interim financial
reports issued to stockholders. It also established standards
for related disclosures about products and services, geographic
areas and major customers. Operating segments are defined as
components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the
chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in
deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
Solectrons chief operating decision maker is the Chief
Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer evaluates
financial information on a company-wide basis for purposes of
making decisions and assessing financial performance.
Accordingly, Solectron has one operating segment.
Geographic net sales are attributable to the country in which
the product is manufactured. Geographic information for
continuing operations as of and for the periods presented is as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Geographic net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
808.5
|
|
|
$
|
828.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,605.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,615.2
|
|
Other North and Latin America
|
|
|
385.6
|
|
|
|
448.0
|
|
|
|
743.6
|
|
|
|
921.7
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
288.8
|
|
|
|
381.2
|
|
|
|
602.7
|
|
|
|
815.3
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
515.3
|
|
|
|
514.7
|
|
|
|
1,012.1
|
|
|
|
951.2
|
|
China
|
|
|
279.1
|
|
|
|
349.5
|
|
|
|
538.6
|
|
|
|
689.6
|
|
Other Asia Pacific
|
|
|
222.3
|
|
|
|
233.8
|
|
|
|
453.8
|
|
|
|
453.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,499.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,756.0
|
|
|
$
|
4,956.0
|
|
|
$
|
5,446.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
August 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
299.7
|
|
|
$
|
314.3
|
|
Other North and Latin America
|
|
|
165.7
|
|
|
|
165.7
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
130.7
|
|
|
|
138.0
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
299.7
|
|
|
|
275.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
895.8
|
|
|
$
|
893.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain customers accounted for 10% or more of our net sales.
The following table includes these customers and the percentage
of net sales attributed to them:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cisco Systems
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
Nortel Networks
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Solectron has concentrations of credit risk due to sales to the
customers listed above as well as to Solectrons other
significant customers. No customer accounted for 10% or more of
total accounts receivable at February 28, 2006.
8.00% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016
On February 14, 2006, Solectrons wholly owned
subsidiary Solectron Global Finance Ltd (Solectron Global
Finance) issued $150 million of senior subordinated
notes to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on
Rule 144A under the Securities Act. The notes are
unconditionally guaranteed by Solectron on a senior subordinated
basis, and will mature on March 15, 2016, and bear interest
at the rate of 8% annually. Cash interest payments on the notes
will be made semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September
15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2006. The notes
will be redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after
March 15, 2011 at specified redemption prices plus accrued
and unpaid interest. Prior to March 15, 2011, subject to
certain outstanding principal amount and redemption timing
conditions, Solectron Global Finance will have the option to
redeem the notes, in whole or in part at a price equal to the
greater of 100% or the make-whole premium plus accrued and
unpaid interest. In addition, subject to certain conditions,
prior to March 15, 2009, Solectron Global Finance or
Solectron may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount
of notes with the net proceeds of a public common stock offering
by Solectron at a redemption price of 108% of the principal
amount of the notes, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the
redemption date. Solectron used the net proceeds from the
offering, together with cash on hand, to repay its
7.375% Senior Notes on March 1, 2006.
0.5% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2034
On February 17, 2004, Solectron issued $450 million of
convertible senior notes (the Original Notes), to
qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A
under the Securities Act. The Original Notes are unsecured and
unsubordinated indebtedness of Solectron and will mature on
February 15, 2034.
On February 10, 2005, Solectron completed an exchange offer
with respect to the Original Notes for an equal amount of its
newly issued 0.5% convertible senior notes, Series B
due 2034 (the New Notes) and cash. Solectron
accepted for exchange $447.3 million aggregate principal
amount of outstanding notes, representing approximately 99.4% of
the total outstanding notes. Upon conversion of the New Notes,
Solectron will deliver $1,000 in cash for
18
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the principal amount, and at its election, either common stock
or cash, for the conversion value above the principal amount.
Holders electing to convert upon a change of control, prior to
February 15, 2011, unless the consideration consists of at
least 90% in the form of listed shares (excluding cash payments
for fractional shares and cash payments made pursuant to
dissenters appraisal rights), shall be eligible for an
increase in the conversion rate in accordance to the terms of
the New Notes.
On or after February 20, 2011, Solectron will have the
option to redeem all or a portion of the convertible notes that
have not been previously purchased, repurchased or converted, at
100% of the principal amount of the convertible notes to be
redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages
owed, if any, up to, but excluding, the date of the purchase.
Holders of the convertible notes may require Solectron to
purchase all or a portion of the convertible notes for cash on
each of February 15, 2011, 2014, 2019, 2024, and 2029 at a
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible
notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, up to,
but excluding, the date of repurchase. Holders will have the
option, subject to certain conditions, to require Solectron to
repurchase any convertible notes held by such holder in the
event of a change in control, as defined, at a price
of 100% of the principal amount of the convertible notes plus
accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the date of
repurchase. The convertible notes are convertible into shares of
common stock of Solectron at any time prior to maturity, subject
to the terms of the notes.
After the exchange offer was complete, there were approximately
$2.7 million aggregate principal amount of Original Notes
outstanding. Interest on both the Original Notes and the New
Notes (together, the convertible notes) will be paid
on February 15 and on August 15 of each year. The conversion
rate for the convertible notes is 103.4468 per $1,000
principal amount. As of February 28, 2006, the aggregate
carrying amount of the convertible notes of $450.0 million
was classified as long-term debt.
7.375% Senior
Notes
In February 1996, Solectron issued $150 million aggregate
principal amount of unsubordinated notes. These notes are in
denominations and have a maturity value of $1,000 each and are
due on March 1, 2006. Interest is payable semiannually at a
rate of 7.375% per annum. The notes may not be redeemed
prior to maturity. As of February 28, 2006, the carrying
amount of the notes of $150.0 million was classified as
short-term debt. These notes were redeemed at maturity on
March 1, 2006.
Adjustable
Conversion-Rate Equity Securities (ACES)
On August 31, 2004, there were 2.6 million ACES units
remaining. Each ACES unit has a stated amount of $25.00 and
consisted of (a) a contract requiring the holder to
purchase, for $25.00, a number of shares of Solectron common
stock (subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments); and
(b) a $25 principal amount of 7.97% subordinated
debenture due November 2006.
On November 15, 2004, Solectron issued 6.6 million
shares of its common stock at a settlement rate of
2.5484 shares per ACES unit as defined above. Solectron
received cash proceeds of $64.3 million which resulted in a
corresponding increase in additional paid in capital. The equity
component of the ACES has been settled. Accordingly, the
remaining obligation of the original ACES is the
7.97% subordinated debentures.
As of February 28, 2006, the 7.97% subordinated
debentures due November 2006 had a carrying value of
$64.3 million and were classified as short-term debt.
Liquid
Yield Option Notes
(LYONstm)
On February 28, 2006, Solectron had $8.6 million
aggregate accreted value of
LYONstm
outstanding with an interest rate of 2.75%. These notes are
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Solectron.
Solectron will pay no interest prior to maturity. Each note has
a yield of 2.75% with a maturity value of $1,000 on May 8,
2020. Each note is convertible at any time by the holder to
common shares at a conversion rate of 12.3309 shares per
note.
19
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Holders will be able to require Solectron to purchase all or a
portion of their notes on May 8, 2010, at a price of
$761.00 per note. Solectron, at its option, may redeem all
or a portion of the notes at any time on or after May 20,
2004. As of February 28, 2006, the accreted value of the
2.75%
LYONstm
is classified as long-term debt.
On February 28, 2006, Solectron had $1.1 million
aggregate accreted value of
LYONstm
outstanding with an interest rate of 3.25%. These notes are
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Solectron.
Solectron will pay no interest prior to maturity. Each note has
a yield of 3.25% with a maturity value of $1,000 on
November 20, 2020. Each note is convertible at any time by
the holder to common shares at a conversion rate of
11.7862 shares per note. Holders will be able to require
Solectron to purchase all or a portion of their notes on
November 20, 2010, at a price of $724.42 per note.
Solectron, at its option, may redeem all or a portion of the
notes at any time on or after May 20, 2004. As of
February 28, 2006, the accreted value of the 3.25%
LYONstm
is classified as long-term debt.
NOTE 11 Derivative
Instruments
Solectron enters into foreign exchange forward contracts
intended to reduce the short-term impact of foreign currency
fluctuations on foreign currency receivables, investments,
payables and indebtedness. The gains and losses on the foreign
exchange forward contracts are intended to largely offset the
transaction gains and losses on the foreign currency
receivables, investments, payables, and indebtedness recognized
in operating results. Solectron does not enter into foreign
exchange forward contracts for speculative purposes.
Solectrons foreign exchange forward contracts related to
current assets and liabilities are generally three months or
less in original maturity.
As of February 28, 2006, Solectron had outstanding foreign
exchange forward contracts with a total notional amount of
approximately $391.0 million.
For all derivative transactions, Solectron is exposed to
counterparty credit risk to the extent that the counterparties
may not be able to meet their obligations towards Solectron. To
manage the counterparty risk, Solectron limits its derivative
transactions to those with major financial institutions.
Solectron does not expect to experience any material adverse
financial consequences as a result of default by
Solectrons counterparties.
Financial instruments that potentially subject Solectron to
concentrations of credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents
and trade accounts receivable. Concentrations of credit risk in
accounts receivable resulting from sales to major customers are
discussed in Note 9, Segment Information and
Geographic Information.
NOTE 12 Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill information is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Balance at August 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
148.80
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
(1.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at February 28, 2006
|
|
$
|
147.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Solectrons intangible assets are classified as other
assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and
categorized into three main classes: supply agreements,
intellectual property and contractual and non-contractual
customer relationships obtained in asset purchases or business
combinations. The following table summarizes the intangible
asset balance at February 28, 2006 and August 31, 2005
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual
|
|
|
Customer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
February 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross amount
|
|
$
|
89.5
|
|
|
$
|
61.0
|
|
|
$
|
98.9
|
|
|
$
|
249.4
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(85.9
|
)
|
|
|
(57.1
|
)
|
|
|
(88.9
|
)
|
|
|
(231.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross amount
|
|
$
|
91.9
|
|
|
$
|
61.0
|
|
|
$
|
98.9
|
|
|
$
|
251.8
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(86.7
|
)
|
|
|
(56.2
|
)
|
|
|
(84.1
|
)
|
|
|
(227.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
14.8
|
|
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended February 28, 2006, Solectron
recorded a $2.4 million impairment of an intangible asset
in connection with the termination of a customer relationship
for which an intangible asset had been established. A
$.5 million gain on sale of fully depreciated equipment to
this former customer has been reported as a component of
restructuring and impairment costs
Amortization expense for the three months and six months ended
February 28, 2006 was approximately $1.7 million and
$3.9 million, respectively. Annual amortization expense for
these intangibles over the next five years would be
approximately $4.6 million, $4.2 million,
$3.9 million, $2.9 million and $1.2 million.
NOTE 13 Discontinued
Operations
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and the first quarter
of fiscal 2004, as a result of a full review of its portfolio of
businesses, Solectron committed to a plan to divest a number of
business operations that are outside its core competencies. The
companies which we have divested and that are included in
discontinued operations are Dy 4 Systems Inc., Kavlico
Corporation, Solectrons MicroTechnology division, SMART
Modular Technologies Inc., Stream International Inc.,
Solectrons 63% interest in US Robotics Corporation, and
Force Computers, Inc.
These businesses each qualify as a discontinued operation
component of Solectron under SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets. Solectron has reported the results of operations
and consolidated financial position of these businesses in
discontinued operations within the consolidated statements of
operations and the balance sheets for all periods presented.
21
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The results from discontinued operations were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Operating
income net
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Interest
income net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income net
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
13.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2004, Solectron completed the sale of six of its
discontinued operations. During the first quarter of fiscal
2005, Solectron completed the sale of its MicroTechnology
division, the final discontinued operation, for cash proceeds of
$30.0 million resulting in a $10.1 million pre-tax
gain which is included in operating income net
for the quarter ended November 30, 2004. As a result of
this disposition, Solectron transferred approximately
$28.3 million from accumulated foreign currency translation
gains, included in accumulated other comprehensive losses within
Stockholders Equity and recognized that amount as part of
the pre-tax gain. The sales agreement for this divesture
provided for a possible adjustment to the proceeds and gain
based upon final settlement of Microtechnologys working
capital at closing. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006,
the working capital adjustment pursuant to the sales agreement
was resolved, resulting in a gain of $9.4 million.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, Solectron increased the
net loss on disposal of those discontinued operations by
approximately $0.5 million resulting from a few
insignificant adjustments pursuant to the terms of the disposal
transaction. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, Solectron
sold a building that was subject to a synthetic lease agreement.
The synthetic lease agreement was associated with a discontinued
operation that has been sold. As a result of the transaction,
Solectron recorded a gain of approximately $0.9 million in
operating income net as disclosed above.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, Solectron recorded a
$2.1 million gain on sale of assets of discontinued
operations having no remaining book value and $1.7 million
associated with the favorable resolution of certain
contingencies. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006,
Solectron recorded a $2.1 million gain on the sale of
assets formerly associated with a discontinued operation and
$1.8 million associated with the favorable resolution of
certain contingencies.
The sale agreements for the divestitures contain certain
indemnification provisions pursuant to which Solectron may be
required to indemnify the buyer of the divested business for
liabilities, losses, or expenses arising out of breaches of
covenants and certain breaches of representations and warranties
relating to the condition of the business prior to and at the
time of sale. In aggregate, Solectron is contingently liable for
up to $94.8 million for a period of 12 to 24 months
subsequent to the completion of the sale. As of
February 28, 2006, there were no significant liabilities
recorded under these indemnification obligations. Additionally,
Solectron may be required to indemnify a buyer for environmental
remediation costs for a period up to 10 years and not to
exceed $13 million. Solectron maintains an insurance policy
to cover environmental remediation liabilities in excess of
reserves previously established upon the acquisition of these
properties. Solectron did not record any environmental charges
upon disposition of these properties.
22
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
NOTE 14 Restructuring
and Impairment
Over the past few years, Solectron has recorded restructuring
and impairment costs as it rationalized operations in light of
customer demand declines and the economic downturn. The
measures, which included reducing the workforce, consolidating
facilities and changing the strategic focus of a number of
sites, was largely intended to align Solectrons capacity
and infrastructure to anticipated customer demand and transition
our operations to lower cost regions. The restructuring and
impairment costs include employee severance and benefit costs,
costs related to leased facilities abandoned and subleased,
impairment of owned facilities no longer used by Solectron which
will be disposed, costs related to leased equipment that has
been abandoned, and impairment of owned equipment that will be
disposed. For owned facilities and equipment, the impairment
loss recognized was based on the fair value less costs to sell,
with fair value estimated based on existing market prices for
similar assets. Severance and benefit costs are recorded in
accordance with SFAS No. 112, Employers
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits, as Solectron has
concluded that it had a substantive severance plan. In
accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, the
estimated lease loss accrued for leased facilities abandoned and
subleased after December 31, 2002 represents the fair value
of the lease liability as measured by the present value of
future lease payments subsequent to abandonment less the present
value of any estimated sublease income. For those facilities
abandoned and subleased before January 1, 2003, as part of
restructuring activities under EITF Issue
No. 94-3,
the estimated lease loss represents payments subsequent to
abandonment less any estimated sublease income. In order to
estimate future sublease income, we work with real estate
brokers to estimate the length of time until we can sublease a
facility and the amount of rent we can expect to receive.
Estimates of expected sublease income could change based on
factors that affect our ability to sublease those facilities
such as general economic conditions and the real estate market,
among others. At each reporting date, the Company evaluates its
accruals for exit costs and employee separation costs to ensure
the accruals are still appropriate. In certain circumstances,
accruals are no longer required because of efficiencies in
carrying out the plans or because employees previously
identified for separation resigned from the Company and did not
receive severance or were redeployed due to circumstances not
foreseen when the original plans were initiated. The Company
reverses accruals through the income statement line item where
the original charges were recorded when it is determined that
they are no longer required.
See also Note 12, Goodwill and Intangible
Assets, for discussion of intangible asset impairment
charges.
Overview
of Restructuring Plans
Fiscal
Year 2005 Restructuring Plan
During fiscal year 2005, in response to a decline in revenues
from fiscal year 2004 levels, we reviewed our cost structure and
geographic footprint and determined that cost savings could be
realized by moving certain activities from high-cost facilities
in Europe and North America to facilities in low cost
geographies. This restructuring plan as amended will result in
restructuring charges of approximately $55 million to
$65 million, and includes the following measures:
|
|
|
|
|
Closing our facilities in Hillsboro, Oregon; Winnipeg, Canada;
Lincoln, California; Turnhout, Belgium; and Munich, Germany.
|
|
|
|
Eliminating approximately 2,400 positions at (1) the
facilities being closed; (2) our facilities in Bordeaux,
France; Dunfermline, Scotland; Mexico; Brazil; and other
facilities; and (3) within our material procurement and
sales organizations in Europe and North America. These actions
included the elimination of certain positions, the migration of
certain functional activities to facilities in low cost
geographies, and the outsourcing of certain activities.
|
|
|
|
Impair certain long-lived assets (primarily building and
leasehold improvement) in connection with the facilities being
vacated and equipment made obsolete to the extent that we would
be unable to recover their carrying value upon sales to third
parties.
|
23
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Cumulative restructuring costs recorded under this plan as of
February 28, 2006 were $54.4 million. As of
February 28, 2006, we have reduced our workforce by 2,000
personnel in connection with this plan and expect to reduce
headcount by an additional 400 personnel prior to the completion
of this plan. We expect to substantially complete this
restructuring plan by the end of fiscal 2006.
Fiscal
Year 2004 Restructuring Plan
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, in order to drive savings
in its human resources and information technology functions, as
well as reduce labor costs in certain high cost facilities,
Solectron committed to a plan to eliminate approximately
2,100 full-time positions primarily in Europe and North
America, consolidate certain facilities, and impair certain
long-lived assets.
This plan was expected to result in total restructuring charges
of $20.0 million. Through February 28, 2006, Solectron
had recorded restructuring charges of approximately
$25.6 million related to this plan. This amount consisted
of $11.2 million of severance charges, $10.2 million
relating to the impairment of certain long-lived assets, and
$4.2 million of facility lease obligation and other
expenses. The facility lease obligation currently expires in
2011. We expect to substantially complete this restructuring
plan by the end of fiscal 2006.
Legacy
Restructuring Plans
From 2001 through 2003, a significant economic downturn
adversely impacted Solectrons business, resulting in a
decline in revenues from $17.4 billion in fiscal year 2001
to $9.8 billion in fiscal year 2003. In response to these
trends, Solectron initiated a series of restructuring measures
to align its capacity and infrastructure with anticipated
customer demand. These actions included significant reductions
in the Companys workforce, the closure and consolidation
of facilities, and the impairment of certain long-lived assets.
These restructuring activities are substantially complete as of
February 28, 2006, as the remaining accrual is almost
entirely attributable to ongoing facility lease obligations,
which are currently leased through 2014. However, we expect to
incur restructuring costs as we continue to sell restructured
long-lived assets and revise previous estimates in connection
with these plans. Revisions to estimates will primarily be due
to changes in assumptions used for the facility lease loss
accrual.
Three
and six months ended February 28, 2006 and
2005
Solectron continued to incur expected restructuring charges in
the first and second quarter of fiscal 2006 in accordance with
previously announced plans. The employee severance and benefit
costs included in the restructuring charges recorded in the
first and second quarters of fiscal 2006 primarily arose from
the 2005 Restructuring Plan described above. Solectron also
recorded a $1.6 million impairment of tangible assets
relating to a consolidated subsidiary during the second quarter
of fiscal 2006.
24
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes restructuring charges included in
the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
February 28
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Nature
|
|
Loss on diposal of and impairment
of equipment and facilities, net
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
38.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
39.7
|
|
|
non-cash
|
Intangible asset impairment
charge, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment of equipment,
facilities and intangibles
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
|
|
non-cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and benefit costs
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
cash
|
Net adjustment to facility lease
loss accrual
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
cash
|
Net adjustment to equipment lease
loss accrual
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
cash
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash restructuring
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and non-cash
restructuring
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
43.2
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
Accrual
The following table summarizes the restructuring accrual balance
for continuing operations as of February 28, 2006 (in
millions). The amounts presented include remaining obligations
under both the 2005 Restructuring Plan and prior plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Leased Facilities
|
|
|
Other Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Benefits
|
|
|
& Equipment
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance of accrual at
August 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
44.9
|
|
|
$
|
32.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
77.7
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Q1-FY06 Provision Adjustments
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
Q1-FY06 Cash Payments
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Adjustment
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of accrual at
November 30, 2005
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Q2-FY06 Provision Adjustments
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
Q2-FY06 Cash Payments
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Adjustment
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of accrual at
February 28, 2006
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
$
|
27.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals related to restructuring activities were recorded in
accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets. Solectron expects to pay amounts related to
severance and benefits in the next year. The remaining balance,
primarily consisting of lease commitment costs on facilities, is
expected to be paid out through 2014.
25
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Restructuring
Activity by Plan
The restructuring and impairment charges incurred by
restructuring plan during the six month period ended
February 28, 2006, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004
|
|
|
Legacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at August 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
40.2
|
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
$
|
77.7
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Provision adjustments
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Adjustment
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at November 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
29.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
|
$
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1FY2006 loss on disposal of and
impairment of equipment and facilities, net
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Provision adjustments
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Adjustment
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at February 28, 2006
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
$
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2FY2006 loss on disposal of and
impairment of equipment and facilities, net
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 15
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share Calculation
|
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share
calculates the effect of dilutive securities on weighted average
shares. Dilutive securities include options to purchase common
stock and shares issuable upon conversion of Solectrons
LYONs and ACES.
26
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Net income (loss) per share data were computed as follows (in
millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
54.4
|
|
|
$
|
56.0
|
|
Shares used in computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares
outstanding
|
|
|
908.8
|
|
|
|
977.1
|
|
|
|
917.3
|
|
|
|
966.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
54.4
|
|
|
$
|
56.0
|
|
Shares used in computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares
outstanding
|
|
|
908.8
|
|
|
|
977.1
|
|
|
|
917.3
|
|
|
|
966.7
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of
LYONs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of
ACES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
909.7
|
|
|
|
977.1
|
|
|
|
918.1
|
|
|
|
970.6
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the weighted average dilutive
securities that were excluded from the above computation of
diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have an
anti-dilutive effect (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of
LYONs
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of
ACES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of
0.5% notes
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dilutive potential common
shares
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is
more likely than not that all or a portion of
deferred tax assets will not be realized. A review of all
available positive and negative evidence needs to be considered,
including the companys performance, the market environment
in which the company operates, the utilization of past tax
credits, length of carryback and carryforward periods, and
existing contracts or sales backlog that will result in future
profits, among other factors. It further states that forming a
conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult
when there is negative evidence such as cumulative losses in
recent years in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax
assets relate. Therefore, cumulative losses weigh heavily in the
overall assessment. As a result of the review undertaken after
the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2003, Solectron concluded
that it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance
for most of the net deferred tax assets arising from its
operations in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax assets
relate. The total
27
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
valuation allowance is approximately $1.7 billion as of
February 28, 2006. In addition, Solectron expects to
continue to provide a full valuation allowance on future tax
benefits until it can demonstrate a sustained level of
profitability that establishes its ability to utilize the assets
in the jurisdictions to which the assets relate. Solectron
incurs tax expense in certain countries which are not subject to
the aforementioned valuation allowance during the three and six
months ended February 28, 2006.
Certain of Solectrons non-US operations are reporting
taxable profits, mostly arising in low-cost locations.
Accordingly, Solectron anticipates some tax expense in future
quarters related to those operations. Solectron will not be able
to offset this tax expense with unrecognized deferred tax assets
described above, because, for the most part, those assets did
not arise in the jurisdictions where Solectron is realizing
taxable profits.
The income tax provision for the interim periods is based on the
best estimate of the effective tax rate expected to be
applicable for the full fiscal year. Changes in the interim
period for the tax (or benefit) related to items other than
ordinary income are individually computed and recognized when
the items occur.
In addition, Solectron has established contingency reserves for
income taxes in various jurisdictions in accordance with
SFAS No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies.
The estimate of appropriate tax reserves is based upon the
probable amount of prior tax benefit that is at risk upon audit
and upon the reasonable estimate of the amount at risk.
Solectron periodically reassesses the amount of such reserves
and adjusts reserve balances as necessary. During the six months
ended February 28, 2006, we recorded an additional accrual
related to a transfer pricing adjustment assessed by a foreign
tax authority. The recorded amount represents managements
best estimate of the cost it will incur in relation to the
exposure, but there is a reasonable possibility that the final
settlement could differ from the estimate. The estimate of the
range of possible loss is $0.6 million to
$12.0 million.
|
|
NOTE 17
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
In January of 2006, Paul Tufano became Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Solectron Corporation.
Mr. Tufano is also a member of the Board of Directors of
Teradyne, a customer of Solectron. In the ordinary course of
business, Solectron has for the past 10 years sold printed
circuit board assemblies to Teradyne and purchased in-curcuit
testers from Teradyne. During the quarter ended
February 24, 2006, Solectron had sales of
$50.6 million to Teradyne, all of which were made on an
arms length basis.
|
|
NOTE 18
|
Guarantee
of Subsidiary Notes
|
Solectrons 8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 were
issued by Solectron Global Finance LTD, an indirect 100%-owned
finance subsidiary of Solectron Corporation. The notes are fully
and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by
Solectron Corporation. No other subsidiary of Solectron
Corporation guarantees the notes.
|
|
NOTE 19
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On March 1, 2006, Solectron Corporation redeemed at
maturity with cash its $150 million aggregate principal
amount of 7.375% Senior Notes.
Solectron has settled the previously reported shareholder class
action lawsuit entitled Abrams v. Solectron Corporation
et al., Case
No. C-03-0986
CRB, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California, on terms not considered to be material
to Solectron. Court approval of the settlement terms was
obtained on March 3, 2006.
28
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
With the exception of historical facts, the statements
contained in this quarterly report are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), and are subject to the safe harbor provisions set
forth in the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements
relate to matters including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
future sales and operating results, including future earnings,
growth, rates and trends;
|
|
|
|
our anticipation of the timing and amounts of our future
obligations and commitments and our ability to meet those
commitments;
|
|
|
|
the impact of our Lean Initiative and its expected future
benefit to us;
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding valuation allowances on future tax
benefits in various countries;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our reserves for potential tax liabilities for
open periods;
|
|
|
|
the amount of available future cash and our belief that our cash
and cash equivalents, short-term investments, lines of credit
and cash from continuing operations will be sufficient for us to
meet our obligations for the next twelve months;
|
|
|
|
the success, capabilities and capacities of our business
operations;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our restructuring provisions and timing of our
restructuring actions and their impact on our business or
results of operations;
|
|
|
|
the anticipated financial impact of recent and future
acquisitions and divestitures and the adequacy of our provisions
for indemnification obligations pursuant to such transactions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to comply with the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
|
|
our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
our belief that our current or future environmental liability
exposure related to our facilities will not be material to our
business, financial condition or results of operations; and
|
|
|
|
various other forward-looking statements contained in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
We intend that our forward-looking statements be subject to
the safe harbors created by the Exchange Act. The
forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words
such as intend, anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect
and other similar words and statements and variations or
negatives of these words. Our forward-looking statements are
based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions and are
subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in condition,
significance, value and effect, including those discussed under
the heading Risk Factors in this report and in our
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
Forms 10-K,
10-Q,
8-K,
S-3 and
S-4. Such
risks, uncertainties and changes in condition, significance,
value and effect could cause our actual results to differ
materially from our anticipated outcomes. Although we believe
that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements
are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate.
Therefore, we can give no assurance that the results implied by
these forward-looking statements will be realized. The inclusion
of forward-looking information should not be regarded as a
representation by our company or any other person that the
future events, plans or expectations contemplated by Solectron
will be achieved. Furthermore, past performance in operations
and share price is not necessarily indicative of future
performance. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update
or revise any forward-looking statements contained in the
documents incorporated by reference herein, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.
29
Overview
We provide a range of worldwide manufacturing and integrated
supply chain services to companies who design and market
electronic products. Our revenue is generated from sales of our
services primarily to customers in the Computing &
Storage, Networking, Communications, Consumer, Industrial,
Automotive, and Other (includes Medical, Defense and Aerospace)
markets. As a result of the services we perform for our
customers, we are impacted by our customers ability to
appropriately predict market demand for their products. While we
work with our customers to understand their demand needs, we are
removed from the actual end-market served by our customers.
Consequently, determining future trends and estimates of
activity can be very difficult.
Summary
of Results and Key Performance Indicators
The following table sets forth, for the three-month and
six-month periods indicated certain key operating results and
other financial information (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,499.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,756.0
|
|
|
$
|
4,956.0
|
|
|
$
|
5,446.6
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
129.0
|
|
|
|
157.9
|
|
|
|
254.6
|
|
|
|
313.4
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense
|
|
|
104.3
|
|
|
|
104.7
|
|
|
|
211.7
|
|
|
|
200.3
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
Management regularly reviews financial and non-financial
performance indicators to assess the Companys operating
results. The following table sets forth, for the quarterly
periods indicated, certain of managements key financial
performance indicators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
February 28,
|
|
November 30,
|
|
August 31,
|
|
May 31,
|
|
February 28,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2005
|
|
2005
|
|
2005
|
|
Inventory turns
|
|
7.4 turns
|
|
8.0 turns
|
|
7.9 turns
|
|
8.1 turns
|
|
7.9 turns
|
Days sales outstanding (DSO)
|
|
44 days
|
|
45 days
|
|
46 days
|
|
46 days
|
|
46 days
|
Days payable outstanding (DPO)
|
|
54 days
|
|
53 days
|
|
54 days
|
|
50 days
|
|
48 days
|
Cash-to-cash
cycle (C2C)
|
|
40 days
|
|
37 days
|
|
38 days
|
|
41 days
|
|
44 days
|
Capital expenditures (in millions)
|
|
$50.8
|
|
$58.9
|
|
$48.4
|
|
$35.9
|
|
$34.1
|
Inventory turns is calculated as the ratio of cost of sales
compared to the average inventory for the quarter. DSO is
calculated as the ratio of average accounts receivable, net, for
the quarter compared to average daily net sales for the quarter.
DPO is calculated as the ratio of average accounts payable
during the quarter compared to average daily cost of sales for
the quarter. The C2C cycle is determined by taking the ratio of
360 days compared to inventory turns plus DSO minus DPO.
Capital expenditures are primarily related to equipment
purchases supporting replacement of aged equipment, increased
demand in certain products, new programs and information
technology projects.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management is required to make judgments, assumptions and
estimates that affect the amounts reported when we prepare
consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. Note 1, Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial
statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005, describes the
significant accounting policies and methods used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Estimates
are used for, but not limited to, our accounting for revenue
recognition, inventory valuation, allowance for doubtful
accounts, goodwill, intangible assets, restructuring and related
impairment costs, income taxes, loss contingencies and
stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
30
The following critical accounting policies are impacted
significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in
the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
Solectron principally generates revenue from the manufacture of
products for customers, the repair of both in-warranty and
out-of-warranty
products, and the provision of supply chain services. Solectron
recognizes revenue from product sales or services rendered when
the following four revenue recognition criteria are met:
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is
fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
We record reductions to revenue for customer incentive programs
in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue No.
01-09,
Accounting for Consideration Given from a Vendor to a
Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors
Products). Such incentive programs include premium
payments and rebates. Premium payments are up-front payments to
customers at program inception, made as a part of a competitive
bidding arrangement, and sometimes in lieu of acquiring
manufacturing assets and workforce from the customer. Premium
payments are recognized either up-front or over time based on
the terms of the customer agreement. In order to recognize a
premium over time, the customer agreement must clearly state
that we are entitled to a refund of the premium payment from the
customer, either pro rata or otherwise, if certain production
levels are not achieved. Where such contractual recovery
provisions exist, we believe that a probable future economic
benefit exists and, thus, establish an asset, which is amortized
against revenue as product
and/or
service delivery occurs under the contract. When the contractual
recovery provisions do not exist, we record the premium payment
as an immediate up-front reduction of revenues. For those
incentives that require the estimation of future sales, such as
for rebates, we use historical experience and internal and
customer data to estimate the sales incentive at the time
revenue is recognized. In the event that the actual results of
these items differ from the estimates, adjustments to the sales
incentive accruals are recorded. To date, these adjustments have
not been material.
From
time-to-time,
Solectron includes an extended warranty at the time of product
shipment. The revenue associated with the extended warranty is
deferred and recognized over the extended warranty period.
Certain customer arrangements require evaluation of the criteria
outlined in EITF Issue
No. 99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an
Agent, in determining whether it is appropriate to record
the gross amount of product sales and related costs or the net
amount earned as commissions. Generally, when Solectron is
primarily obligated in a transaction, is subject to general and
physical inventory risk, has latitude in establishing prices,
has discretion in selecting suppliers, changes the product or
performs the service, is involved in the determination of
product or service specifications, and has credit risk, or has
several but not all of these indicators, revenue is recorded
gross. If several of these indicators are not present, Solectron
generally records the net amounts as commissions earned. For
example, in a situation where a customer retains ownership of
the materials utilized in their products, Solectron would
generally only recognize revenue on a net basis.
Inventory
Valuation
Our inventories are stated at the lower of weighted average cost
or market. Our industry is characterized by rapid technological
change, short-term customer commitments and rapid changes in
demand, as well as other factors which may influence the
recoverability of inventories. We make provisions for estimated
excess and obsolete inventory based on our regular reviews of
inventory quantities on hand and the latest forecasts of product
demand and production requirements from our customers. Our
provisions for excess and obsolete inventory are also impacted
by our contractual arrangements with our customers including our
ability or inability to re-sell such inventory to them. If
actual market conditions or our customers product demands
are less favorable than those projected or if our customers are
unwilling or unable to comply with any contractual arrangements
related to excess and obsolete inventory, additional provisions
may be required. If an additional .2% to .5% of our inventory
were determined to be excess and obsolete at February 28,
2006, our gross profit and operating income from continuing
operations before income taxes for the six month ended
February 28, 2006 would have each decreased by
$2.7 million to $6.7 million.
31
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Another area of judgment affecting reported revenue and net
income is managements estimate of receivables that will
ultimately be collected. We evaluate the collectability of our
accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. When we
are aware of circumstances that may impair a specific
customers ability to meet its financial obligations to us,
we record a specific allowance against amounts due to us and
thereby reduce the net receivable to the amount we reasonably
believe is likely to be collected. For all other customers, we
recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length
of time the receivables are outstanding, industry and geographic
concentrations, the current business environment and our
historical experience. If the financial condition of our
customers deteriorates or if economic conditions worsen,
additional allowances may be required. Using this information,
management reserves an amount that is believed to be
uncollectible. Based on managements analysis of
uncollectible accounts, reserves totaling $16.4 million or
1.4% of the gross accounts receivable balance were established
at February 28, 2006, compared with $22.3 million or
1.4% of the gross accounts receivable balance at August 31,
2005.
Goodwill
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, we review the carrying amount of
goodwill for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth
quarter (as of June 1). Additionally, we perform an impairment
assessment of goodwill whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may
not be recoverable. Significant changes in circumstances can be
both internal to our strategic and financial direction, as well
as changes to the competitive and economic landscape. We have
determined that there is a single reporting unit for the purpose
of goodwill impairment tests under SFAS No. 142. For
purposes of assessing the impairment of our goodwill, we
estimate the value of the reporting unit using our market
capitalization as the best evidence of fair value. This fair
value is then compared to the carrying value of the reporting
unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its
carrying value, we then allocate the fair value of the unit to
all the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any
unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting units
fair value was the purchase price to acquire the reporting unit.
The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the
amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied
fair value of the goodwill. If the carrying amount of the
reporting units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of
that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to that excess. The process of evaluating the potential
impairment of goodwill is subjective and requires judgment at
many points during the test including future revenue forecasts,
discount rates and various reporting unit allocations. During
fiscal year 2003, Solectron recorded a $1.6 billion
goodwill impairment as a result of significant negative industry
and economic trends impacting Solectrons operations and
stock price.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets consist of supply agreements, intellectual
property, and contractual and non-contractual customer
relationships obtained in acquisitions. Intangible assets are
evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. Intangible assets subject to impairment testing
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate total
$17.5 million as of February 28, 2006. The carrying
amount of an intangible asset is not recoverable if its carrying
value exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to
result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset.
Impairment is measured by comparing the intangible assets
carrying amounts to the fair values as determined using
discounted cash flow models. There is significant judgment
involved in determining these cash flows. During fiscal years
2004 and 2003, respectively, Solectron recorded impairments of
intangible assets in connection with our disengagement from
certain product lines and as a result of reduced expectations of
sales to be realized under certain supply agreements,
respectively.
Restructuring
and Related Impairment Costs
Over the past few years, we have recorded restructuring and
impairment costs as we rationalized our operations in light of
customer demand declines and the economic downturn. These
measures, which included reducing the workforce, consolidating
facilities and changing the strategic focus of a number of
sites, were largely intended to
32
align our capacity and infrastructure to anticipated customer
demand and transition our operations to lower cost regions.
These restructuring measures were undertaken in accordance with
restructuring plans that were reasonable, probable and unlikely
of significant change at the time of plan establishment. These
restructuring and impairment costs include employee severance
and benefit costs, costs related to leased facilities abandoned
and subleased, impairment of owned facilities no longer used by
us which will be disposed, costs related to leased equipment
that has been abandoned, and impairment of owned equipment that
will be disposed. For owned facilities and equipment, the
impairment loss recognized was based on the fair value less
costs to sell, with fair value estimated based on existing
market prices for similar assets.
Severance and benefit costs are recorded in accordance with
SFAS No. 112, Employers Accounting for
Postemployment Benefits, as we concluded that we had a
substantive severance plan based on past restructuring actions
in many of the geographies in which we operate. These costs are
recognized when Solectron management has committed to a formal
restructuring plan and the severance costs are probable and
estimable. We apply the provisions of SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities relating to one-time termination benefits to
both (1) severance activities in geographies where we do
not have a substantive severance plan and (2) situations in
which the severance benefits offered to employees within a given
geography are in excess of those offered under prior
restructuring plans. Severance costs accounted for under
SFAS No. 146 are recognized when Solectron management
has committed to a restructuring plan and communicated those
actions to employees. Our estimate of severance and benefit
costs assumptions is subjective as it is based on estimates of
employee attrition and assumptions about future business
opportunities.
In accordance with SFAS No. 146, the estimated lease
loss accrued for leased facilities abandoned and subleased after
December 31, 2002 represents the fair value of the lease
liability as measured by the present value of future lease
payments subsequent to abandonment less the present value of any
estimated sublease income. For those facilities abandoned and
subleased before January 1, 2003, as part of restructuring
activities under EITF Issue
No. 94-3,
Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination
Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity, the
estimated lease loss represents payments subsequent to
abandonment less any estimated sublease income. In order to
estimate future sublease income, we work with real estate
brokers to estimate the length of time until we can sublease a
facility and the amount of rent we can expect to receive.
Estimates of expected sublease income could change based on
factors that affect our ability to sublease those facilities
such as general economic conditions and the real estate market,
among others.
Other exit costs include costs to consolidate facilities or
close facilities and relocate employees. A liability for such
costs is recorded at its fair value in the period in which the
liability is incurred.
At each reporting date, we evaluate our accruals for exit costs
and employee separation costs to ensure the accruals are still
appropriate. In certain circumstances, accruals are no longer
required because of efficiencies in carrying out the plans or
because employees previously identified for separation resigned
and did not receive severance or were redeployed due to
circumstances not foreseen when the original plans were
initiated. If necessary, we reverse accruals through the income
statement line item entitled Restructuring and impairment
costs, where the original charges were recorded, when it
is determined that they are no longer required.
Income
Taxes
We currently have significant deferred tax assets in certain
jurisdictions resulting from tax credit carry-forwards, net
operating losses and other deductible temporary differences,
which will reduce taxable income in such jurisdictions in future
periods. We have provided valuation allowances for future tax
benefits resulting from U.S. and foreign net operating loss
carry-forwards and for certain other U.S. and foreign deductible
temporary differences where we believe future realizability is
in doubt. SFAS No. 109 requires a valuation allowance
be established when it is more likely than not that
all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized,
and further provides that it is difficult to conclude that a
valuation allowance is not needed when there is negative
evidence in the form of cumulative losses in recent years.
Therefore, cumulative losses weigh heavily in the overall
assessment. In the third quarter of fiscal year 2003, we
established a valuation allowance for most of our deferred tax
assets. This was primarily due to cumulative losses from prior
years and uncertainty regarding our ability to generate certain
minimum levels of taxable income within the next three years. We
have not yet established a
33
sustained level of profitability since that time in those
countries in which the deferred tax assets arose and thus expect
to record a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits. Our
ability to realize sustained profitability in those
jurisdictions in the near term is uncertain as Solectron derives
the majority of its revenue from low-cost locations. It is these
low-cost locations where Solectron anticipates reporting taxable
profits. Solectron will not be able to offset any tax expense
associated with these taxable profits with the unrecognized
deferred tax assets described above. As a result of our
assessment, our total valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
arising from continuing operations is approximately
$1.7 billion at February 28, 2006.
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining
our worldwide income tax provision and evaluating tax positions.
There are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate
tax determination is uncertain and we are regularly under audit
by tax authorities. Accordingly, we have established contingency
reserves for income taxes in various jurisdictions in accordance
with SFAS No. 5 Accounting for
Contingencies.
We believe that our accruals for tax liabilities are adequate
for all open years, based on our assessment of many factors,
including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied
to the facts of each matter. Although we believe that our
accruals for tax liabilities are reasonable, tax regulations are
subject to interpretation and the tax controversy process is
inherently uncertain; therefore, our assessments can involve
both a series of complex judgments about future events and rely
heavily on estimates and assumptions. To the extent that the
probable tax outcome of these matters changes, such changes in
estimates will impact the income tax provision in the period in
which such determination is made.
Loss
Contingencies
We are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies
arising in the ordinary course of business (for example,
environmental and legal matters). We consider the likelihood of
the loss occurring and our ability to reasonably estimate the
amount of loss in determining the necessity for, and amount of,
any loss contingencies. Estimated loss contingencies are accrued
when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly
evaluate information available to us to determine whether any
such accruals should be adjusted. Such revisions in the
estimates of the potential loss contingencies could have a
material impact on our consolidated results of operations and
financial position.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment. Under the fair value recognition
provisions of this statement, share-based compensation cost is
measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and
is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining
the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires
judgment, including estimating out stock price volatility and
employee stock option exercise behaviors. If actual results
differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based
compensation expense and our results of operations could be
materially impacted.
Our expected volatility is based upon equal weightings of the
historical volatility of Solectrons stock and, for fiscal
periods in which there is sufficient trading volume in options
on Solectrons stock, the implied volatility of traded
options on Solectron stock having a life of more than
6 months.
The expected life of options is based on observed historical
exercise patterns, which can vary over time.
As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, the amount of expense has been
reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123R
requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and
revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were
estimated based on historical experience.
If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the
application of SFAS No. 123R, the compensation expense
that we record in future periods may differ significantly from
what we have recorded in the current period.
34
Results
of Operations
The following table summarizes certain items in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of net
sales. The financial information and the discussion below should
be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. The
discussion following the table is provided separately for
continuing and discontinued operations. For all periods
presented, our condensed consolidated statements of operations
exclude the results from certain operations we plan to divest
which have been classified as discontinued operations.
Information related to the discontinued operations results is
provided separately; following the continuing operations
discussion below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
94.8
|
|
|
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
94.9
|
|
|
|
94.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Restructuring and impairment costs
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Other (expense)
income net
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income from continuing
operations before income taxes
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Sales Continuing Operations
Net sales decreased to $2.5 billion and $5.0 billion
for the three and six months ended February 28, 2006,
respectively, from $2.8 billion and $5.4 billion in
the corresponding periods of fiscal 2005. The majority of this
reduction occurred in the consumer end market which declined by
$197 million, or 45%, and $455 million, or 50%,
respectively, in the three month and six month periods ended
February 28, 2006, versus the corresponding periods of
fiscal 2005. This decline in the consumer sector was
attributable to a significant drop in sales of 3G cellular
handsets and set-top boxes. However, sales of set-top boxes have
increased sequentially from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 to
the first quarter of fiscal 2006, and from the first quarter of
fiscal 2006 to the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Due to lower
customer demand, primarily for telecom infrastructure equipment,
the communications market declined by $70 million, or 13%,
and $174 million, or 16%, respectively, in the three month
and six month periods ended February 28, 2006, versus the
corresponding periods of fiscal 2005.
These declines were offset by revenue increases in the
computing & storage and industrial end markets.
Computing & storage end market revenues increased by
$21 million, or 3%, and $79 million, or 5%, in the
three month and six month periods ended February 28, 2006
versus the corresponding periods of fiscal 2005. This increase
was largely due to higher demand for computer servers. Largely
due to increased sales of semiconductor manufacturing equipment,
industrial revenues increased by $52.5 million, or 36%, and
$111.5 million, or 38.5%,
35
respectively, in the three month and six month periods ended
February 28, 2006 versus the corresponding period of
fiscal 2005.
The following table depicts, for the periods indicated, revenue
by market expressed as a percentage of net sales. The
distribution of revenue across our markets has fluctuated, and
will continue to fluctuate, as a result of customer demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Computing & Storage
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
Communications
|
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
Networking
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
Industrial
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
Automotive
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
Sales Continuing Operations
In the three and six months ended February 28, 2006, our
international locations contributed approximately 67.7% and
67.6% of net sales compared to approximately 69.9% and 70.3%,
respectively, for the corresponding period of fiscal 2005.
Major
Customers Continuing Operations
Certain customers accounted for 10% or more of our net sales.
The following table includes these customers and the percentage
of net sales attributed to them:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cisco Systems
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
Nortel Networks
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 61.9% and
60.8% of net sales for the three and six months ended
February 28, 2006, compared to approximately 63.5% and
61.5% in the corresponding periods of fiscal 2005.
We believe that our ability to grow depends on increasing sales
to existing customers and on successfully attracting new
customers. Customer contracts can be canceled and volume levels
can be changed or delayed. The timely replacement of delayed,
canceled or reduced orders with new business cannot be ensured.
In addition, we cannot assume that any of our current customers
will continue to utilize our services. Consequently, our results
of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Gross
Profit Continuing Operations
Our gross profit percentage decreased to 5.2% and 5.1% for the
three and six months ended February 28, 2006, respectively,
compared to 5.7% and 5.8% for the corresponding periods in
fiscal 2005, respectively. The gross profit percentage decline
was driven by cost of sales decreasing at a lower rate than net
sales versus the corresponding periods in fiscal 2005. Cost of
sales declined by $227.5 million, or 8.8%, and
$431.8 million, or 8.4%, in the three
36
months and six months ended February 28, 2006,
respectively, versus the corresponding periods in fiscal 2005.
This gross profit percentage decline was primarily the result of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
A 0.7 percentage point and 0.6 percentage point
increase as a percentage of revenue in direct labor and overhead
costs for the three and six months ended February 28, 2006,
respectively, over the corresponding periods in fiscal 2005.
This increase was driven by additions of headcount in
anticipation of certain customer program ramps as well as wage
increases.
|
|
|
|
A 0.7 percentage point and 0.7 percentage point
increase in material supply chain costs as a percentage of
revenues, largely attributable to higher freight, duties, fuel
costs, and labor costs, for each of the three and six months
ended February 28, 2006, respectively, over the
corresponding periods in fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
These increases in cost of sales were partially offset by a
0.9 percentage point and 0.7 percentage point decrease
in material and material related costs as a percentage of
revenues for the three and six months ended February 28,
2006, respectively, over the corresponding periods in fiscal
2005.
|
|
|
|
In addition, to the above items, the adoption of SFAS 123R
during fiscal 2006, increased cost of sales by $1.8 million
and $3.6 million during the three month and six month
periods ended February 28, 2006, respectively, compared to
the corresponding periods of fiscal 2005.
|
Sales of inventory previously written down or written off have
not been significant and have not had any material impact on our
gross profits for the three and six months ended
February 28, 2006.
Selling,
General and Administrative (SG&A)
Expenses Continuing Operations
SG&A expenses decreased $0.4 million, or 0.4%, for the
three months ended February 28, 2006 compared to the
corresponding period in fiscal 2005. SG&A expenses increased
$11.4 million, or 6% for the six months ended
February 28, 2006, compared to the corresponding period in
fiscal 2005. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses
increased to 4.2% and 4.3% for the three and six months ended
February 28, 2006, respectively, compared to 3.8% and 3.7%
in the corresponding periods in fiscal 2005.
The increase for the six months ended February 28, 2006
compared to the corresponding period in fiscal 2005 was
attributable to approximately $4 million in new SG&A
expenses due to the adoption of FAS 123R and approximately
$10 million arising from additional headcount in the
sales & account management and program management
areas. These increases were partially offset by a
$2 million reduction in bad debt expense.
Restructuring
and Impairment Continuing Operations
Total restructuring and impairment charges were
$5.6 million and $6.5 million during the three and six
months ended February 28, 2006, respectively.
The restructuring and impairment charges incurred during the
second quarter of fiscal 2006 consist of equipment and
facilities impairment charges of $5.1 million, which
include a $1.6 million impairment of tangible assets of a
consolidated entity; a net reduction to the severance provision
of $2.8 million due to changes in planned severance
actions; and $3.3 million of charges arising from early
lease terminations and changes in lease estimates relative to
restructured facilities. The revision to estimated severance
costs was driven by employee turnover and a new business
opportunity specific to one of our facilities.
During the six months ended February 28, 2006, Solectron
recorded a $1.9 million net impairment charge in connection
with the termination of a customer relationship for which an
intangible asset had previously been established. This net
amount consisted of a $2.4 million impairment charge offset
by a $.5 million gain on the sale of equipment to this
former customer.
Interest
Income Continuing Operations
Interest income increased $3.2 million to
$12.3 million for the three months ended February 28,
2006 from $9.1 million in the corresponding period in
fiscal 2005. Interest income increased $9.5 million to
$24.4 million for
37
the six months ended February 28, 2006 from
$14.9 million in the corresponding period in fiscal 2005.
The increase was primarily due to higher interest rates.
Interest
Expense Continuing Operations
Interest expense decreased $9.8 million to
$6.9 million for the three months ended February 28,
2006 from $16.7 million in the corresponding period in
fiscal 2005. Interest expense decreased $19.4 million to
$13.6 million for the six months ended February 28,
2006 from $33.0 million in the corresponding period in
fiscal 2005. The decrease was primarily due to the May 2005
redemption of $500 million aggregate principal amount of
9.625% senior notes.
Other
(Expense)
Income net Continuing
Operations
Other (expense) income net decreased
$3.0 million to an expense of $1.9 million for the
three months ended February 28, 2006 from income of
$1.1 million in the corresponding period in fiscal 2005.
Other (expense) income net decreased
$5.8 million to $0 million for the six months ended
February 28, 2006 from income of $5.8 million in the
corresponding period in fiscal 2005. The fluctuation is
primarily due to foreign currency gains and losses.
Income
Taxes Continuing Operations
Our income tax expense was $5.5 million and
$9.9 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended February 28, 2006 as compared to an income tax
expense of $6.6 million and $12.5 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended
February 28, 2005. We incurred net tax expense in certain
countries in which we had profitable operations during the
periods ended February 28, 2006 and February 28, 2005.
The effective income tax rate is largely a function of the
balance between income and losses from domestic and
international operations. Our international operations, taken as
a whole, have been subject to tax at a lower rate than
operations in the United States, primarily due to tax holidays
granted to certain of our overseas sites in Malaysia and
Singapore. The Malaysian tax holiday is effective through
January 2012, subject to certain conditions, including
maintaining certain levels of research and development
expenditures. The Singapore tax holiday is effective through
March 2011, subject to certain conditions. Solectron also enjoys
the benefit of low statutory income tax rates in various
provinces throughout China on the basis of the qualification as
a high tech enterprise.
Certain of our offshore operations are reporting taxable
profits, mostly arising in low-cost locations. Accordingly, we
are recognizing some tax expense related to those operations. We
will not be able to offset this tax expense with unrecognized
deferred tax assets (See Note 16 Income
Taxes), because, for the most part, those assets did not arise
in the jurisdictions where we are realizing taxable profits.
In addition, Solectron has established contingency reserves for
income taxes in various jurisdictions. The estimate of
appropriate tax reserves is based upon the probable amount of
prior tax benefit that is at risk upon audit and upon the
reasonable estimate of the amount at risk. Solectron
periodically reassesses the amount of such reserves and adjusts
reserve balances as necessary. During the six months ended
February 28, 2006, we recorded an additional accrual
related to a transfer pricing adjustment assessed by a foreign
tax authority. The recorded amount represents managements
best estimate of the cost it will incur in relation to the
exposure but there is a reasonable possibility that the final
settlement could differ from the estimate. The estimate of the
range of possible loss is $0.6 million to
$12.0 million.
38
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
Cash and cash equivalents decreased to approximately
$1.5 billion at February 28, 2006 from approximately
$1.7 billion at August 31, 2005. The table below, for
the periods indicated, provides selected condensed consolidated
cash flow information (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended February
28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(70.0
|
)
|
|
|
476.6
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
(78.2
|
)
|
|
|
470.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(103.1
|
)
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(86.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(29.1
|
)
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities was $78.2 million
during the six months ended February 28, 2006. This change
was generated by a $237.4 million increase in inventories.
This was partially offset by net income of $54.4 million,
non-cash depreciation and amortization charges of
$87.5 million, and a $59.0 million increase in
accounts payable. The inventory increase was attributable to new
program ramps, certain program launch delays and the creation of
buffer stock to accommodate both program transfers between sites
and the go-live date of a new ERP system at one of our
facilities.
Net cash used in investing activities of $86 million during
the six months ended February 28, 2006 primarily consisted
of $109.7 million in capital expenditures offset by $17.1
of cash provided by discontinued operations. The cash provided
by investing activities of discontinued operations primarily
consisted of a working capital settlement and sales of assets
formerly associated with discontinued operations.
Net cash used in financing activities of $38 million during
the six months ended February 28, 2006 primarily consisted
of $180.4 million of share repurchases partially offset by
$147.4 million in net proceeds from the issuance of our
8% senior subordinated notes due 2016.
Debt
As of February 28, 2006, we had available a
$500 million revolving credit facility that expires on
August 20, 2007. Our revolving credit facility is
guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries and secured
by the pledge of domestic accounts receivable, inventory and
equipment, the pledge of equity interests in certain of our
subsidiaries and notes evidencing intercompany debt. Borrowings
under the credit facility bear interest, at our option, at the
London Interbank offering rate (LIBOR) plus a margin of 2.25%
based on our current senior secured debt ratings, or the higher
of the Federal Funds Rate plus 1/2 of 1% or Bank of America
N.A.s publicly announced prime rate. As of
February 28, 2006, there were no borrowings outstanding
under this facility. We are subject to compliance with certain
financial covenants set forth in this facility including, but
not limited to, capital expenditures, cash interest coverage and
leverage. We were in compliance with all applicable covenants as
of February 28, 2006.
In addition, we had $8.4 million in committed and
$11.7 million in uncommitted foreign lines of credit and
other bank facilities as of February 28, 2006. A committed
line of credit obligates a lender to loan us amounts under the
credit facility as long as we adhere to the terms of the credit
agreement. An uncommitted line of credit is extended to us at
the sole discretion of a lender. The interest rates range from
the banks prime lending rate to the
39
banks prime rate plus 1.0%. As of February 28, 2006,
borrowings and guaranteed amounts were $2.8 million under
committed and $2.2 million under uncommitted foreign lines
of credit.
$150 million aggregate principal amount of unsubordinated
7.375% Senior Notes was repaid on March 1, 2006.
$64.3 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.97% ACES
subordinated debenture is due November 15, 2006. These
obligations were classified as current liabilities at
February 28, 2006.
Synthetic
Leases
We have synthetic lease agreements relating to three
manufacturing sites for continuing operations. The synthetic
leases have expiration dates in 2007. At the end of the lease
term, we have an option, subject to certain conditions, to
purchase or to cause a third party to purchase the facilities
subject to the synthetic leases for the Termination
Value, which approximates the lessors original cost
for each facility, or we may market the property to a third
party at a different price. We are entitled to any proceeds from
a sale of the properties to third parties in excess of the
Termination Value and liable to the lessor for any shortfall not
to exceed 85% of the Termination Value We have provided loans to
the lessor equaling approximately 85% of the Termination Value
for each synthetic lease. These loans are repayable solely from
the sale of the properties to third parties in the future, are
subordinated to the amounts payable to the lessor at the end of
the synthetic leases, and may be credited against the
Termination Value payable if we purchase the properties. The
approximate aggregate Termination Values and loan amounts were
$87.7 million and $74.5 million, respectively, as of
February 28, 2006.
In addition, cash collateral of $13.2 million, an amount
equal to the difference between the aggregate Termination Values
and the loan amounts, is pledged as collateral. Each synthetic
lease agreement contains various affirmative covenants. A
default under a lease, including violation of these covenants,
may accelerate the termination date of the arrangement. We were
in compliance with all applicable covenants as of
February 28, 2006. Monthly lease payments are generally
based on the Termination Value and
30-day LIBOR
index (4.57% as of February 28, 2006) plus an
interest-rate margin, which may vary depending upon our
Moodys Investors Services and Standard and
Poors ratings, and are allocated between the lessor and us
based on the proportion of the loan amount to the Termination
Value for each synthetic lease.
During fiscal 2004, we determined that it is probable that the
expected fair value of the properties under the synthetic lease
agreements will be less than the Termination Value at the end of
the lease terms by approximately $13.5 million. The
$13.5 million is being accreted over the remaining lease
terms. As of February 28, 2006, Solectron had accreted
$7.3 million.
We account for these synthetic lease arrangements as operating
leases in accordance with SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, as amended. Our loans to the
lessor and cash collateral are included in other assets and
restricted cash and cash equivalents, respectively, in the
condensed consolidated balance sheets
Restricted
Cash
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, Solectron elected to
put in place a line of credit for the issuance of standby
letters of credit. The letters of credit are principally related
to self-insurance for workers compensation liability coverage.
These standby letters of credit were previously issued under
Solectrons revolving credit facility. Solectron opted to
post cash collateral totaling 105% of the standby letter of
credit balances in order to reduce annual issuance commissions
of the standby letters of credit. Total cash collateral of
$18 million at February 28, 2006, is classified as
restricted cash and cash equivalents in the condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Solectron also has
$13.2 million of restricted cash in connection with the
synthetic leases described above. The interest earned on
restricted cash is at Solectrons benefit.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
Our off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations
consist of our synthetic and operating leases, our foreign
exchange contracts, and certain indemnification provisions
related to our seven divestures (described in the
Discontinued Operations section below).
40
A tabular presentation of our contractual obligations is
provided below under Contractual Obligations and
Commitments.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents, short-term
investments, lines of credit and cash anticipated to be
generated from continuing operations will satisfy our expected
working capital, capital expenditures, debt service and
investment requirements through at least the next 12 months.
The following is a summary of certain contractual obligations
and commitments as of February 28, 2006 for continuing
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-
|
|
|
Q3 07-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Q4 07
|
|
|
FY08
|
|
|
FY09
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
FY11
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$
|
860.2
|
|
|
$
|
227.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
450.0
|
|
|
$
|
167.5
|
|
Operating lease
|
|
|
142.1
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
Operating leases for restructured
facilities and equipment
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Purchase obligations(1)
|
|
|
150.9
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,189.4
|
|
|
$
|
424.9
|
|
|
$
|
27.1
|
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
|
$
|
21.0
|
|
|
$
|
32.2
|
|
|
$
|
464.8
|
|
|
$
|
190.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have guaranteed various purchase commitments for materials,
supplies and services incurred during the normal course of
business. |
Other long-term liabilities of $79.6 million disclosed on
the condensed consolidated financial statements includes
deferred tax liabilities related to timing differences and
non-US pension liabilities, which due to their nature are not
projected.
Discontinued
Operations
During fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004, as a result of a full review
of our portfolio of businesses, we committed to a plan to divest
a number of business operations that are no longer part of our
strategic plan for the future. In accordance with
SFAS No. 144, we have reported the results of
operations and financial position of these businesses in
discontinued operations within the consolidated statements of
operations and balance sheets for all periods presented. The
companies that we have divested and that are included in
discontinued operations are: Dy 4 Systems Inc., Kavlico
Corporation, Solectrons MicroTechnology division, SMART
Modular Technologies Inc., Stream International Inc., our 63%
interest in US Robotics Corporation, and Force Computers, Inc.
41
The collective results from all discontinued operations for all
periods presented were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
February 28
|
|
|
Ended February 28
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Operating
income net
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Interest
income net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
(expense) net
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
13.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, gross profit, and operating income (loss) from
discontinued operations decreased for the six months ended
February 28, 2006 as compared to the same period in fiscal
2005 primarily due to the fact that the final discontinued
operation was sold during three months ended November 30,
2004. This transaction resulted in a $10.1 million pre-tax
gain from the sale of the discontinued operations recorded in
operating income net for the three month period
ended November 30, 2004, including the transfer of
$28.3 million from accumulated foreign currency translation
gains, included in accumulated other comprehensive losses within
Stockholders Equity. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006,
the working capital adjustment pursuant to the sales agreement
was resolved, resulting in a gain of $9.4 million.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, Solectron increased the
net loss on disposal of those discontinued operations by
approximately $0.5 million resulting from a few
insignificant adjustments pursuant to the terms of the disposal
transaction. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, Solectron
sold a building that was subject to a synthetic lease agreement.
The synthetic lease agreement was associated with a discontinued
operation that has been sold. As a result of the transaction,
Solectron recorded a gain of approximately $0.9 million in
operating income net as disclosed above.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, Solectron recorded a
$2.1 million gain on sale of assets of discontinued
operations having no remaining book value and $1.7 million
associated with the favorable resolution of certain
contingencies. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006,
Solectron recorded a $2.1 million gain on the sale of
assets formerly associated with a discontinued operation and
$1.8 million associated with the favorable resolution of
certain contingencies.
The sale agreements for all the divestitures contain certain
indemnification provisions pursuant to which Solectron may be
required to indemnify the buyer of the divested business for
liabilities, losses, or expenses arising out of breaches of
covenants and certain breaches of representations and warranties
relating to the condition of the business prior to and at the
time of sale. In aggregate, Solectron is contingently liable for
up to $94.8 million for a period of 12 to 24 months
subsequent to the completion of the sale. As of
February 28, 2006, there were no significant liabilities
recorded under these indemnification obligations. Additionally,
Solectron may be required to indemnify a buyer for environmental
remediation costs for a period up to 10 years and not to
exceed $13 million. Solectron maintains an insurance policy
to cover environmental remediation liabilities in excess of
reserves previously established upon the acquisition of these
properties. Solectron did not record any environmental charges
upon disposition of these properties.
42
RISK
FACTORS
Risks
Related to Our Business
Most
of our sales come from a small number of customers; if we lose
any of these customers, our net sales could decline
significantly.
Most of our annual net sales come from a small number of our
customers. Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately
61.9% and 63.5% of net sales from continuing operations in the
second quarter of fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the
second quarter of fiscal 2006, two of these customers each
individually accounted for more than ten percent of our net
sales. Any material delay, cancellation or reduction of orders
from these or other major customers could cause our net sales to
decline significantly, and we may not be able to reduce the
accompanying expenses at the same time. We cannot guarantee that
we will be able to retain any of our largest customers or any
other accounts, or that we will be able to realize the expected
revenues under existing or anticipated supply agreements with
these customers. Our business, market share, consolidated
financial condition and results of operations will continue to
depend significantly on our ability to obtain orders from new
customers, retain existing customers, realize expected revenues
under existing and anticipated supply agreements, as well as on
the consolidated financial condition and success of our
customers and their customers.
Sales may not improve, and could decline, in future periods if
there is continued or resumed weakness in customer demand,
particularly in the communications, computing and consumer
sectors, resulting from domestic or worldwide economic
conditions.
Our
customers may cancel their orders, change production quantities
or locations, or delay production.
To remain competitive, EMS companies must provide their
customers increasingly rapid product turnaround, at increasingly
competitive prices. We generally do not have long-term
contractual commitments from our top customers. As a result, we
cannot guarantee that we will continue to receive any orders or
revenues from our customers. Customers may cancel orders at
their sole discretion, change production quantities or delay
production for a number of reasons outside of our control. Many
of our customers have experienced from time to time significant
decreases in demand for their products and services, as well as
continual material price competition and sales price erosion.
This volatility has resulted, and will continue to result, in
our customers delaying purchases on the products we manufacture
for them, and placing purchase orders for lower volumes of
products than previously anticipated. Cancellations, reductions
or delays by a significant customer or by a group of customers
would seriously harm our results of operations by lowering,
eliminating or deferring revenue without substantial offsetting
reductions in our costs thereby reducing our profitability. In
addition, customers may require that manufacturing of their
products be transitioned from one of our facilities to another
of our facilities to achieve cost reductions and other
objectives. Such transfers, if unanticipated or not properly
executed, could result in various inefficiencies and increased
costs, including excess capacity and overhead at one facility
and capacity constraints and related strains on our resources at
the other, disruption and delays in product deliveries and
sales, deterioration in product quality and customer
satisfaction, and increased manufacturing and scrap costs all of
which would have the effect of reducing our profits.
We may
not be able to sell excess or obsolete inventory to customers or
third parties, which could have a material adverse impact on our
consolidated financial condition.
The majority of our inventory purchases and commitments are
based upon demand forecasts that our customers provide to us.
The customers forecasts, and any changes to the forecasts,
including cancellations, may lead to on-hand inventory
quantities and on-order purchase commitments that are in excess
of the customers revised needs, or on-hand inventory that
becomes obsolete.
We generally enter into agreements with our significant
customers. Under these agreements, the extent of our
customers responsibility for excess or obsolete inventory
related to raw materials that were previously purchased or
ordered to meet that customers demand forecast is defined.
If our customers do not comply with their contractual
obligations to purchase excess or obsolete inventory back from
us and we are unable to use or sell such inventory, or if we are
unsuccessful in obtaining our customers agreement to
purchase such inventory contractually, our
43
consolidated financial condition could be materially harmed.
Some of our customers are in the communications industry, an
industry that in recent years has experienced declining revenue,
large losses, negative cash flows, and several bankruptcies or
defaults on borrowing arrangements. There is a risk that, in the
future, these or other customers may not purchase inventory back
from us despite contractual obligations, which could harm our
consolidated financial condition if we are unable to sell the
inventory at carrying value. In addition, enforcement of these
supply agreements may result in material expenses, delays in
payment for inventory
and/or
disruptions in our customer relationships.
In addition, we are responsible for excess and obsolete
inventory resulting from inventory purchases in excess of
inventory needed to meet customer demand forecasts at the time
the purchase commitments were made, as well as any inventory
purchases outside that provided for in our agreements. For
inventory which is not the customers responsibility,
provisions are made when required to reduce any such excess or
obsolete inventory to its estimated net realizable value based
on the quantity of such inventory on hand, our customers
latest forecasts of production requirements, our assessment of
available disposition alternatives such as use of components on
other programs, the ability and cost to return components to the
vendor and our estimates of resale values and opportunities.
These assessments are based upon various assumptions and market
conditions which are subject to rapid change,
and/or which
may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Any material changes in
our assumptions or market conditions could have a significant
effect on our estimates of net realizable value, could
necessitate material changes in our provisions for excess and
obsolete inventory, and could have a material adverse impact on
our consolidated financial condition. In addition, in the normal
course of business, bona fide disagreements may arise over the
amount
and/or
timing of such claims, and in order to avoid litigation
expenses, collection risks, or disruption of customer
relationships, we may elect to settle such disputes for lesser
amounts than we believe we should be entitled to recover. In
these instances, we must bear the economic loss of any such
excess or obsolete inventory, which could have a material
adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition.
Our
non-U.S. locations
represent a significant portion of our sales; we are exposed to
risks associated with operating internationally.
Approximately 67.7% and 69.9% of our net sales from continuing
operations are the result of services and products manufactured
in countries outside the United States during the second quarter
of fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. As a result of our
foreign sales and facilities, our operations are subject to a
variety of risks and costs that are unique to international
operations, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
adverse movement of foreign currencies against the
U.S. dollar in which our results are reported;
|
|
|
|
import and export duties, and value added taxes;
|
|
|
|
import and export regulation changes that could erode our profit
margins or restrict exports
and/or
imports;
|
|
|
|
potential restrictions on the transfer of funds;
|
|
|
|
government and license requirements governing the transfer of
technology and products abroad;
|
|
|
|
disruption of local labor supply
and/or
transportation services;
|
|
|
|
inflexible employee contracts in the event of business downturns;
|
|
|
|
the burden and cost of compliance with import and export
regulations and foreign laws;
|
|
|
|
economic and political risks in emerging or developing
economies; and
|
|
|
|
risks of conflict and terrorism that could disrupt our or our
customers and suppliers businesses.
|
We have been granted tax holidays, subject to some conditions,
for our Malaysian site, effective through January 2012, and our
Singapore sites, effective through March 2011. These tax
holidays are effective for various terms and are subject to some
conditions. It is possible that the current tax holidays will be
terminated or modified or that future tax holidays that we may
seek will not be granted. If the current tax holidays are
terminated or modified, or if additional tax holidays are not
granted in the future or when our current tax holidays expire,
our future effective income tax rate could increase.
44
We are
exposed to general economic conditions, which could have a
material adverse impact on our business, operating results and
consolidated financial condition.
As a result of the recent economic conditions in the United
States and internationally, and reduced capital spending as well
as uncertain end-market demand, our sales have been difficult to
forecast with accuracy. Though we have seen some recovery in the
markets that we serve, if there were to be continued weakness,
or any further deterioration in the markets in which we operate
or the business or financial condition of our customers, it
would have a material adverse impact on our business, operating
results and consolidated financial condition. In addition, if
the economic conditions in the United States and the other
markets we serve worsen, we may experience a material adverse
impact on our business, operating results and consolidated
financial condition.
Possible
fluctuation of operating results from quarter to quarter and
factors out of our control could affect the market price of our
securities.
Our quarterly earnings
and/or stock
price may fluctuate in the future due to a number of factors
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
differences in the profitability of the types of manufacturing
services we provide. For example, high velocity and low
complexity printed circuit boards and systems assembly services
have lower gross profit than low volume/complex printed circuit
boards and systems assembly services;
|
|
|
|
our ability to maximize the hours of use of our equipment and
facilities is dependent on the duration of the production run
time for each job and customer;
|
|
|
|
the amount of automation that we can use in the manufacturing
process for cost reduction varies, depending upon the complexity
of the product being made;
|
|
|
|
our customers demand for our products and their ability to
take delivery of our products and make timely payments for
delivered products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to optimize the ordering of inventory as to timing
and amount to avoid holding inventory in excess of immediate
production needs;
|
|
|
|
our ability to offer technologically advanced, cost-effective,
quick response manufacturing services;
|
|
|
|
our ability to drive down manufacturing costs in accordance with
customer and market requirements is dependent upon our ability
to apply Lean Six Sigma operating principles;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the availability and pricing of components;
|
|
|
|
timing of expenditures in anticipation of increased sales;
|
|
|
|
cyclicality in our target markets;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our market share;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
expenses and disruptions associated with acquisitions and
divestitures;
|
|
|
|
announcements of operating results and business conditions by
our customers;
|
|
|
|
announcements by our competitors relating to new customers or
technological innovation or new services;
|
|
|
|
economic developments in the electronics industry as a whole;
|
|
|
|
credit rating and stock analyst downgrades;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate changes to our enterprise
resource planning, or ERP, system;
|
|
|
|
political and economic developments in countries in which we
have operations; and
|
|
|
|
general market conditions.
|
45
If our operating results in the future are below the
expectations of securities analysts and investors, the market
price of our outstanding securities could be harmed.
If we
incur more restructuring-related charges than currently
anticipated, our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations may suffer.
We incurred approximately $5.6 million of restructuring and
impairment costs relating to continuing operations in the second
quarter of fiscal 2006 and approximately $43.2 million
during the second quarter of fiscal 2005. If our estimates about
previous restructuring charges prove to be inadequate, our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations may
suffer. We continue to evaluate our cost structure relative to
future financial results and customer demand. If our estimates
about future financial results and customer demand prove to be
inadequate, our consolidated financial condition and
consolidated results of operations may suffer.
Failure
to attract and retain key personnel and skilled associates could
hurt our operations.
Our continued success depends to a large extent upon the efforts
and abilities of key managerial and technical associates. Losing
the services of key personnel could harm us. Our business also
depends upon our ability to continue to attract and retain key
executives, senior managers and skilled associates. Failure to
do so could harm our business.
We
depend on limited or sole source suppliers for critical
components. The inability to obtain sufficient components as
required, and under favorable purchase terms, would cause harm
to our business.
We are dependent on certain suppliers, including limited and
sole source suppliers, to provide key components used in our
products. We have experienced, and may in the future experience,
delays in component deliveries, which in turn could cause delays
in product shipments and require the redesign of certain
products. In addition, if we are unable to procure necessary
components under favorable purchase terms, including at
favorable prices and with the order lead-times needed for the
efficient and profitable operation of our factories, our results
of operations could suffer. The electronics industry has
experienced in the past, and may experience in the future,
shortages in semiconductor devices, including
application-specific integrated circuits, DRAM, SRAM, flash
memory, certain passive devices such as tantalum capacitors, and
other commodities that may be caused by such conditions as
overall market demand surges or supplier production capacity
constraints. The inability to continue to obtain sufficient
components as and when required, or to develop alternative
sources as and when required, could cause delays, disruptions or
reductions in product shipments or require product redesigns
which could damage relationships with current or prospective
customers, and increase inventory levels and costs, thereby
causing harm to our business.
We
potentially bear the risk of price increases associated with
shortages in electronics components.
At various times, there have been shortages of components in the
electronics industry leading to increased component prices. One
of the services that we perform for many customers is purchasing
electronics components used in the manufacturing of the
customers products. As a result of this service, we
potentially bear the risk of price increases for these
components if we are unable to purchase components at the
pricing level anticipated to support the margins assumed in our
agreements with our customers.
Our
net sales could decline if our competitors provide comparable
manufacturing services and improved products at a lower
cost.
We compete with a number of different contract manufacturers,
depending on the type of service we provide or the geographic
locale of our operations. This industry is intensely competitive
and some of our competitors may have greater manufacturing,
financial, R&D
and/or
marketing resources than we have. In addition, we may not be
able to offer prices as low as some of our competitors because
those competitors may have lower cost structures as a result of
their geographic location or the services they provide, or
because such competitors are willing to accept business at lower
margins in order to utilize more of their excess capacity. In
that event, our net sales would decline. We also expect our
competitors to continue to improve the performance of their
current products or services, to
46
reduce their current products or service sales prices and to
introduce new products or services that may offer greater
value-added performance and improved pricing. If we are unable
to improve our capabilities substantially, any of these could
cause a decline in sales, loss of market acceptance of our
products or services and corresponding loss of market share, or
profit margin compression. We have experienced instances in
which customers have transferred certain portions of their
business to competitors in response to more attractive pricing
quotations than we have been willing to offer, and there can be
no assurance that we will not lose business in the future in
response to such competitive pricing or other inducements which
may be offered by our competitors.
We
depend on the continuing trend of OEMs to
outsource.
A substantial factor in our past revenue growth was attributable
to the transfer of manufacturing and supply-based management
activities from our OEM customers. Future growth is partially
dependent on new outsourcing opportunities. To the extent that
these opportunities are not available, our future growth would
be unfavorably impacted.
Our
strategic relationships with major customers create
risks.
In the past several years, we completed several strategic
transactions with OEM customers. Under these arrangements, we
generally acquired inventory, equipment and other assets from
the OEM, and leased (or in some cases acquired) their
manufacturing facilities, while simultaneously entering into
multi-year supply agreements for the production of their
products. There has been strong competition among EMS companies
for these transactions, and this competition may continue to be
a factor in customers selection of their EMS providers.
These transactions contributed to a significant portion of our
past revenue growth, as well as to a significant portion of our
more recent restructuring charges and goodwill and intangible
asset impairments. While we do not anticipate our acquisitions
of OEM plants and equipment in the near future to return to the
levels at which they occurred in the recent past, there may be
occasions on which we determine it to be advantageous to
complete acquisitions in selected geographic
and/or
industry markets. As part of such arrangements, we would
typically enter into supply agreements with the divesting OEMs,
but such agreements generally do not require any minimum volumes
of purchases by the OEM and the actual volume of purchases may
be less than anticipated. Arrangements which may be entered into
with divesting OEMs typically would involve many risks,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
we may pay a purchase price to the divesting OEMs that exceeds
the value we are ultimately able to realize from the future
business of the OEM;
|
|
|
|
the integration into our business of the acquired assets and
facilities may be time-consuming and costly;
|
|
|
|
we, rather than the divesting OEM, would bear the risk of excess
capacity;
|
|
|
|
we may not achieve anticipated cost reductions and efficiencies;
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to meet the expectations of the OEM as to
volume, product quality, timeliness and cost reductions; and
|
|
|
|
if demand for the OEMs products declines, the OEM may
reduce its volume of purchases, and we may not be able to
sufficiently reduce the expenses of operating the facility or
use the facility to provide services to other OEMs, and we might
find it appropriate to close, rather than continue to operate,
the facility, and any such actions would require us to incur
significant restructuring
and/or
impairment charges.
|
As a result of these and other risks, we may be unable to
achieve anticipated levels of profitability under such
arrangements and they may not result in material revenues or
contribute positively to our earnings.
Business
disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and
financial condition and increase our costs and
expenses.
Our worldwide operations could be subject to natural disasters
and other business disruptions, which could seriously harm our
revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and
expenses. We are predominantly self-insured for losses and
interruptions caused by earthquakes, power shortages,
communications failures, water
47
shortages, tsunamis, floods, typhoons, hurricanes, fires,
extreme weather conditions and other natural or manmade
disasters.
If we
are unable to manage future acquisitions and cost-effectively
run our operations, our profitability could be adversely
affected.
Our ability to manage and integrate future acquisitions will
require successful integration of such acquisitions into our
manufacturing and logistics infrastructure, and may require
enhancements or upgrades of accounting and other internal
management systems and the implementation of a variety of
procedures and controls. We cannot guarantee that significant
problems in these areas will not occur. Any failure to enhance
or expand these systems and implement such procedures and
controls in an efficient manner and at a pace consistent with
our business activities could harm our consolidated financial
condition and results of operations. In addition, we may
experience inefficiencies from the management of geographically
dispersed facilities and incur substantial infrastructure and
working capital costs.
Notwithstanding
our recent divestiture of certain businesses, we will remain
subject to certain indemnification obligations for a period of
time after completion of the divestitures.
The sale agreements for our divested businesses contain
indemnification provisions pursuant to which we may be required
to indemnify the buyer of the divested business for liabilities,
losses or expenses arising out of breaches of covenants and
certain breaches of representations and warranties relating to
the condition of the business prior to and at the time of sale.
While we believe, based upon the facts presently known to us,
that we have made adequate provision for any such potential
indemnification obligations, it is possible that other facts may
become known in the future which may subject us to claims for
additional liabilities or expenses beyond those presently
anticipated and provided for. Should any such unexpected
liabilities or expenses be of a material amount, our finances
could be adversely affected.
If we
have a material weakness in our internal controls over financial
reporting, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of
our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in
the value of our securities.
One or more material weaknesses in our internal controls over
financial reporting could occur or be identified in the future.
In addition, because of inherent limitations, our internal
controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements, and any projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness of internal controls to future periods are subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with our
policies or procedures may deteriorate. If we fail to maintain
the adequacy of our internal controls, including any failure to
implement or difficulty in implementing required new or improved
controls, our business and results of operations could be
harmed, we could fail to be able to provide reasonable assurance
as to our financial results or meet our reporting obligations
and there could be a material adverse effect on the price of our
securities.
If our
products are subject to warranty or liability claims, our
business reputation may be damaged and we may incur significant
costs.
We may experience defects in our designs or deficiencies with
respect to our manufacturing services. In certain of our
manufacturing service contracts, we provide a warranty against
such defects or deficiencies. We may be exposed to warranty
and/or
manufacturers liability claims as a result of these
defects
and/or
deficiencies, and some claims may relate to customer product
recalls. A successful claim for damages arising as a result of
such defects or deficiencies for which we are not insured or
where the damages exceed our insurance coverage or any material
claim for which insurance coverage is denied or limited and for
which indemnification is not available could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition. A successful claim for such damages, or a
product recall conducted by one of our customers, also could
have an adverse effect on our business reputation. A claim,
regardless of merit, might be time-consuming and expensive to
resolve.
48
Our
design and engineering services may result in additional
exposure to product liability, intellectual property
infringement and other claims.
We are offering more design services, primarily those relating
to products that we manufacture for our customers, and we offer
design services related to collaborative design manufacturing
and turnkey solutions. Providing such services can expose us to
different or greater potential liabilities than those we face
when providing our regular manufacturing services. With the
growth of our design services business, we have increased
exposure to potential product liability claims resulting from
injuries caused by defects in products we design, as well as
potential claims that products we design infringe third-party
intellectual property rights. Such claims could subject us to
significant liability for damages and, regardless of their
merits, could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve. We
also may have greater potential exposure from warranty claims,
and from product recalls due to problems caused by product
design. Costs associated with possible product liability claims,
intellectual property infringement claims and product recalls
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
We are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rate fluctuations.
We have currency exposure arising from both sales and purchases
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of
our sites. Fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the
currency of the exposure and the functional currency of our
sites could seriously harm our business, operating results and
consolidated financial condition.
As of February 28, 2006, we had outstanding foreign
exchange forward contracts with a total notional amount of
approximately $391.0 million. The change in value of the
foreign exchange forward contracts resulting from a hypothetical
10% change in foreign exchange rates would be offset by the
remeasurement of the related balance sheet items, the result of
which would not be significant.
The primary objective of our investment activities is to
preserve principal, while at the same time maximize yields
without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this
objective, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents in a
variety of securities, including government and corporate
obligations, certificates of deposit and money market funds. As
of February 28, 2006, substantially our entire total
portfolio was scheduled to mature in less than three months. A
hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would not have a
material effect on the fair value of our investment portfolios.
Our long-term debt instruments are currently subject to fixed
interest rates and the amount of principal to be repaid at
maturity is also fixed. Therefore, although we are not currently
exposed to variable interest rates related to our long-term debt
instruments, we may become exposed if there were to be material
borrowings under our credit facility or we take actions such
that our other long-term debt instruments become exposed to
variable interest rates.
Failure
to comply with environmental regulations could harm our
business.
As a company in the electronics manufacturing services industry,
we are subject to a variety of environmental regulations,
including those relating to the use, storage, discharge and
disposal of hazardous chemicals used during our manufacturing
process as well as air quality and water quality regulations,
restrictions on water use, and storm water regulations. We are
also required to comply with laws and regulations relating to
occupational safety and health, product disposal and product
content and labeling. Although we have never sustained any
significant loss as a result of non-compliance with such
regulations, any failure by us to comply with environmental laws
and regulations could result in liabilities or the suspension of
production. In addition, these laws and regulations could
restrict our ability to expand our facilities or require us to
acquire costly equipment or incur other significant costs to
comply with regulations.
We own and lease some contaminated sites (for some of which we
have been indemnified by third parties for required
remediation), sites for which there is a risk of the presence of
contamination, and sites with some levels of contamination for
which we may be liable and which may or may not ultimately
require any remediation. In addition, we have been and are
potentially liable for contamination at sites where we have
disposed of hazardous materials. We have obtained environmental
insurance to reduce potential environmental liability exposures
posed by some of our operations and facilities. We believe,
based on our current knowledge, that the cost of any
49
groundwater or soil clean up that may be required at our
facilities or at any disposal sites would not materially harm
our business, consolidated financial condition and results of
operations. Nevertheless, the process of remediating
contamination in soil and groundwater at facilities is costly
and cannot be estimated with high levels of confidence, and
there can be no assurance that the costs of such activities
would not harm our business, consolidated financial condition
and results of operations in the future.
In general, we are not directly responsible for the compliance
of our manufactured products with laws like the Waste Electrical
and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive relating to the
collection and recycling of certain electronic products and the
Restrictions of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive relating
to the hazardous materials content of certain electronic
products, both adopted by the European Union, as well as similar
laws being adopted in other countries (including the United
States). These laws generally apply to our OEM customers though
OEM customers may require us to certify that our products meet
the requirements of the laws. Solectron also may provide
compliance-related services with respect to WEEE, RoHS and
similar laws to our customers upon request. Failing to have the
capability of delivering the products which comply with these
present and future environmental laws and regulations could
restrict our ability to expand facilities, or could require us
to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant
expenses to comply with environmental regulations, and could
impair our relations with our customers. Moreover, to the extent
we are found non-compliant with any environmental laws and
regulations applicable to our activities, we may incur
substantial fines and penalties.
We may
not be able to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual
property rights and could become involved in intellectual
property disputes.
In the past we have been and may from time to time continue to
be notified of claims that we may be infringing patents,
copyrights or other intellectual property rights owned by other
parties. In the event of an infringement claim, we may be
required to spend a significant amount of money to develop a
non-infringing alternative, to obtain licenses,
and/or to
defend against the claim. We may not be successful in developing
such an alternative or obtaining a license on reasonable terms,
if at all. Any litigation, even where an infringement claim is
without merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion
of resources. Accordingly, the resolution or adjudication of
intellectual property disputes could have a material adverse
effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and
results of operations.
Our ability to effectively compete may be affected by our
ability to protect our proprietary information. We hold a number
of patents, patent applications, and various trade secrets and
license rights. These patents, trade secrets, and license rights
may not provide meaningful protection for our manufacturing
processes and equipment innovations, or we might find it
necessary to initiate litigation proceedings to protect our
intellectual property rights. Any such litigation could be
lengthy and costly and could harm our consolidated financial
condition.
Rating
downgrades may make it more expensive for us to borrow
money.
Our issuer credit rating is B+ with a positive
outlook by Standard & Poors and our long-term
corporate family rating is B1 with stable outlook by
Moodys. These credit ratings are subject to change at the
discretion of the rating agencies. If our credit ratings were
downgraded, it would increase our cost of capital should we
borrow under our revolving lines of credit, and it may make it
more expensive for us to raise additional capital in the future.
Such capital raising may be on terms that may not be acceptable
to us or capital may not be available to us at all. Any future
adverse rating agency actions with respect to our ratings could
have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities,
our ability to compete for new business, our cost of capital,
and our ability to access capital markets.
Unanticipated
changes in our tax rates or in our exposure to additional income
tax liabilities could affect our operating results and financial
condition.
We are subject to income taxes both in the United States and
various foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rates could be
adversely affected by changes in tax laws and increases in the
percentages of our earnings from countries with higher tax
rates, as well as other factors. If any of these changes were to
occur, our income tax provision, operating results and financial
condition could be adversely affected.
50
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for factors related to
fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currency and
fluctuations in interest rates under Risk
Factors We are exposed to fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates, and We are exposed
to interest rate fluctuations.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on their evaluation as of the
end of the period covered by this Report, Solectrons
principal executive officer and principal financial officer have
concluded that Solectrons disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act)) are effective to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by Solectron in reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in internal control over financial
reporting. There were no changes in
Solectrons internal control over financial reporting
during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 or in other factors
that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially
affect our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Solectron is from time to time involved in various litigation
and legal matters, including the one described below.
Solectron has settled the previously reported shareholder class
action lawsuit entitled Abrams v. Solectron Corporation
et al., Case
No. C-03-0986
CRB, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California, on terms not considered to be material
to Solectron. Court approval of the settlement terms was
obtained on March 3, 2006
|
|
Item 2.
|
Purchases
of Equity Securities
|
On July 22, 2005, Solectrons board of directors
authorized a $250 million stock repurchase program. During
the first fiscal quarter of 2006, Solectron repurchased and
retired 46.6 million shares of its common stock at an
average price of $3.87 for approximately $180.4 million. In
October 2005, Solectron completed the stock repurchase program.
Solectron repurchased and retired a total of 63.6 million
shares for approximately $250.0 million under this program.
On November 1, 2005, Solectron announced that the
Companys Board of Directors had approved a new stock
repurchase program whereby the Company is authorized to
repurchase up to an additional $250 million of the
Companys common stock. Solectron commenced this second
$250 million repurchase program at the end of the quarter
ended February 28, 2006. However, no repurchase
transactions were settled during the quarter.
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended
|
|
3
|
.2**
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the
Registrant
|
|
3
|
.3***
|
|
Certificate of Designation Rights,
Preferences and Privileges of Series A Participating
Preferred Stock of the Registrant
|
|
4
|
.1****
|
|
Indenture dated February 21,
2006, among Solectron Global Finance LTD, as Issuer, Solectron
Corporation, as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
4
|
.2****
|
|
Form of 8.00% Senior
Subordinated Note due 2016 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
|
|
4
|
.3****
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement
dated February 21, 2006, among Solectron Global Finance
LTD, Solectron Corporation and the Initial Purchasers named
therein
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Indirect Sourcing Services
Agreement dated as of March 16, 2006, by and between
Solectron USA, Inc. and International Business Machines
Corporation
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 filed with
Registrants Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended February 28, 2001, Exhibit 3.1 filed
with Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 25, 2000, and
Exhibit 3.1 filed with Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 26, 1999. |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 filed with
Registrants Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended November 28, 2003. |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 filed with
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2001. |
|
**** |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibits 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 to
Registrants
Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on February 21, 2006. |
52
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SOLECTRON CORPORATION
(Registrant)
Paul J. Tufano
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Warren J. Ligan
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: April 5, 2006
53
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended
|
|
3
|
.2**
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the
Registrant
|
|
3
|
.3***
|
|
Certificate of Designation Rights,
Preferences and Privileges of Series A Participating
Preferred Stock of the Registrant
|
|
4
|
.1****
|
|
Indenture dated February 21,
2006, among Solectron Global Finance LTD, as Issuer, Solectron
Corporation, as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee
|
|
4
|
.2****
|
|
Form of 8.00% Senior
Subordinated Note due 2016 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
|
|
4
|
.3****
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement
dated February 21, 2006, among Solectron Global Finance
LTD, Solectron Corporation and the Initial Purchasers named
therein
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Indirect Sourcing Services
Agreement dated as of March 16, 2006, by and between
Solectron USA, Inc. and International Business Machines
Corporation
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 filed with
Registrants Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended February 28, 2001, Exhibit 3.1 filed
with Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 25, 2000, and
Exhibit 3.1 filed with Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 26, 1999. |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 filed with
Registrants Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended November 28, 2003. |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 filed with
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2001. |
|
**** |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibits 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 to
Registrants
Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on February 21, 2006. |
54