STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Unaudited
March 31, 2010
($ in thousands except per share data)
Note Q – Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
Total equity-based compensation for the three months ended March 31 is as follows:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
$ |
1,286 |
|
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
Stock options
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,816 |
|
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
Equity-based compensation is included in operating expenses on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Stock Options
Cash proceeds and intrinsic values related to total stock options exercised during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised
|
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, 32,498 options vested with a weighted average exercise price of $11.87, and 24,000 options vested with a weighted average exercise price of $11.61 during the three months ended March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, there were 1,347,000 unvested options with a total unrecognized compensation cost of $6,343 and an average vesting period of 3.1 years. As of March 31, 2009, there were 602,000 unvested options with a total unrecognized compensation cost of $2,212 and an average vesting period of 3.4 years.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of options granted, which requires several assumptions. The expected term of the options represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on the historical experience of similar awards. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. With the exception of special dividends paid in November of 2005 and 2006, the Company historically has not paid regular dividends and thus the expected dividend rate is assumed to be zero. The weighted average fair value of options granted during the three months ended March 31 2010 and 2009 was approximately $10.07 and $4.91, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Volatility
|
|
50% |
|
|
51% to 52%
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
1.87% to 2.16%
|
|
|
1.39% to 1.57%
|
|
Expected life in years
|
|
3.4 to 3.9
|
|
|
4 |
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Unaudited
March 31, 2010
($ in thousands except per share data)
Note Q – Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
Activity relating to stock options granted under the Company’s plans and outside the plans during the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual Term
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
1,615,000 |
|
|
$ |
13.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
26.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(39,000 |
) |
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
12.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,676,000 |
|
|
$ |
14.59 |
|
5.0 years
|
|
$ |
30,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
329,000 |
|
|
$ |
9.59 |
|
3.4 years
|
|
$ |
7,552 |
|
Restricted Stock
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Fair
Value at
Grant Date
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average Fair
Value at
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 1
|
|
|
447,000 |
|
|
$ |
20.97 |
|
537,000 |
|
$ |
19.68 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
28.39 |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(93,000 |
) |
|
|
21.24 |
|
(98,000 |
) |
$ |
21.39 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
22.70 |
|
(1,000 |
) |
$ |
22.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31
|
|
|
421,000 |
|
|
$ |
22.13 |
|
438,000 |
|
$ |
19.29 |
|
As of March 31, 2010, there was $6,687 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards granted under the Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average of 2.8 years. The Company determines the fair value of its restricted stock awards based on the market price of its common stock on the date of grant.
Note R – Acquisitions
Big Buddha
On February 10, 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of stock of privately held Big Buddha, Inc. (“Big Buddha”) from its sole stockholder (“Seller”). Founded in 2003, Big Buddha designs and markets fashion-forward handbags to specialty retailers and better department stores. Management believes that Big Buddha is a strategic fit for the Company. The acquisition was completed for consideration of $11,029 in cash, net of cash acquired, subject to adjustment, plus contingent payments pursuant to an earn-out agreement with the Seller. The earn-out agreement provides for potential payments to the Seller based on the financial performance of Big Buddha handbags for each of the twelve-month periods ending on March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013. The fair value of the contingent payments was estimated using the present value of management’s projections of the financial results of Big Buddha during the earn-out period. As of March 31, 2010, the Company estimates the fair value of the contingent consideration to be $12,000.
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Unaudited
March 31, 2010
($ in thousands except per share data)
Note R – Acquisitions (continued)
The transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method required by GAAP. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Big Buddha were adjusted to their fair values, and the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, was recorded as goodwill. The fair values assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management’s estimates and assumptions, which are subject to change. The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated as follows:
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
88 |
|
Trade name
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
Non-compete agreement
|
|
|
450 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
Total fair value excluding goodwill
|
|
|
10,729 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
23,029 |
|
The purchase price and related allocation are preliminary and may be revised as a result of adjustments made to the purchase price pursuant to the earn-out provisions or as additional information regarding assets and liabilities require. Contingent consideration classified as a liability will be remeasured at fair value at each reporting date, until the contingency is resolved, with changes recognized in earnings. The goodwill related to this transaction is expected to be deductible for tax purposes over 15 years.
The Company incurred approximately $410 in transaction related costs applicable to the Big Buddha acquisition during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. These expenses are included in operating expenses in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
The results of operations of Big Buddha have been included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income from the date of the acquisition. Unaudited pro forma information related to this acquisition is not included, as the impact of this transaction is not material to the Company’s consolidated results.
Zone 88 and Shakedown Street
On July 8, 2009, the Company acquired certain of the assets constituting the Zone 88 and Shakedown Street (together “Zone 88”) lines of SML Brands, LLC, a subsidiary of Aimee Lynn, Inc. SML Brands designs, sources and markets primarily private label accessories and licensed brands, principally handbags, belts and small leather goods, for mass merchants and mid-tier retailers. Management believes that Big Buddha is a strategic fit for the Company. The acquisition was completed for $1,348 in cash. The fair values assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management’s estimates. The Company allocated $220 to current assets, $409 to the value of customer relationships, $841 to goodwill and $122 to liabilities assumed. The value of customer relationships is being amortized over ten years. The results of operations of Zone 88 have been included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income from the date of the acquisition. Unaudited pro forma information related to this acquisition is not included, as the impact of this transaction is not material to the Company’s consolidated results.
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Unaudited
March 31, 2010
($ in thousands except per share data)
Note S – Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
Wholesale |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
|
$ |
17,265 |
|
|
$ |
5,501 |
|
|
$ |
24,313 |
|
Acquisition of Big Buddha
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
|
$ |
29,565 |
|
|
$ |
5,501 |
|
|
$ |
36,613 |
|
The following table details identifiable intangible assets as of March 31, 2010:
|
|
Estimated lives
|
|
Cost basis
|
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
Net Carrying
Amount
|
|
Trade name
|
|
6–10 years
|
|
$ |
4,300 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
4,092 |
|
Customer relationships
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
11,709 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
9,444 |
|
License agreements
|
|
3–6 years
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
4,348 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
Non-compete agreement
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
Other
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,003 |
|
|
$ |
7,439 |
|
|
$ |
15,564 |
|
The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangibles as of March 31, 2010 is as follows:
2010 (remaining nine months)
|
|
$ |
2,202 |
|
2011
|
|
|
2,412 |
|
2012
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
2013
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
2014
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,564 |
|
Note T – Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, after considering other comprehensive income including unrealized gain on marketable securities of $220 and $38, was $15,605 and $6,615, respectively.
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Unaudited
March 31, 2010
($ in thousands except per share data)
Note U – Commitments, Contingencies and Other
[1] Legal proceedings:
|
(a)
|
On June 24, 2009, The Center For Environmental Health filed a lawsuit, Center for Environmental Health v. Lulu NYC, LLC, Steve Madden, Ltd., Steve Madden Retail, Inc., et al., Case No. RG09459448, in California Superior Court, Alameda County, against the Company and dozens of other California retailers and vendors of leather, vinyl, and/or imitation leather handbags, belts, and shoes alleging that the retailers and vendors failed to warn that certain of such products may expose California citizens to lead and lead compounds. The parties have been in negotiations to resolve the matters informally and have finalized the substance of a consent judgment, the terms of which are not material to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
On June 24, 2009, a class action lawsuit, Shahrzad Tahvilian, et al. v. Steve Madden Retail, Inc. and Steve Madden, Ltd., Case No. BC 414217, was filed in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, against the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Steven Madden Retail, Inc. The complaint, which seeks unspecified damages, alleges violations of California labor laws, including, among other things, that the Company failed to provide mandated meal breaks to its employees and failed to provide overtime pay as required. The Company filed an answer in the litigation denying all allegations stated in the complaint. In March of 2010, the parties submitted the claim to private mediation and a resolution has been delayed until August 2010 pending further discovery. The Company, with the advice of legal counsel, has evaluated the liability in this case and believes that it is not likely to exceed $1,000. Accordingly, the Company accrued $1,000 in the fiscal year 2009. The accrual is subject to change to reflect the status of this matter.
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
On August 10, 2005, following the conclusion of an audit of the Company conducted by auditors for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”) during 2004 and 2005, U.S. Customs issued a report that asserts that certain commissions that the Company treated as “buying agents’ commissions” (which are non-dutiable) should be treated as “selling agents’ commissions” and hence are dutiable. In September of 2007, Customs notified the Company that it had finalized its assessment of the underpaid duties to be $1,400. On October 20, 2005, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement notified the Company’s legal counsel that a formal investigation of the Company’s importing practices had been commenced as a result of the audit. The Company has contested the conclusions of the U.S. Customs audit and filed a request for review and issuance of rulings thereon by U.S. Customs Headquarters, Office of Regulations and Rulings, under internal advice procedures. On November 28, 2007, U.S. Customs Headquarters informed the Company that its request for internal advice had been accepted and was under review. All efforts by U.S. Customs to collect additional duties, fees, interest or penalties have been stayed pending final decision of U.S. Customs Headquarters. In the event that the U.S. Customs auditors’ position is ultimately upheld, the Company may be subject to monetary penalties. A final determination of the matter may not occur for several months or even years. The Company, with the advice of legal counsel, evaluated the liability in the case, including additional duties, interest and penalties, and believes that it is not likely to exceed $2,700. Therefore, as of December 31, 2007, the Company had recorded a total reserve of $2,700 that was increased by $256 in 2008 and $89 in 2009 to reflect anticipated additional interest costs, bringing the reserve as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 to $3,045 and $2,956, respectively. Such reserve is subject to change to reflect the status of this matter.
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
The Company has been named as a defendant in certain other lawsuits in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, after consulting with legal counsel, the liabilities, if any, resulting from these matters should not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. It is the policy of management to disclose the amount or range of reasonably possible losses in excess of recorded amounts.
|
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Unaudited
March 31, 2010
($ in thousands except per share data)
Note V – Operating Segment Information
The Company operates the following business segments: Wholesale Footwear, Wholesale Accessories, Retail, First Cost and Licensing. The Wholesale Footwear segment, through sales to department and specialty stores worldwide, derives revenue from sales of branded women’s, men’s, girls’ and children’s footwear. The Wholesale Accessories segment, which includes branded and private label handbags, belts and small leather goods, derives revenue from sales to department and specialty stores worldwide. The Retail segment, through the operation of Company owned retail stores and the Company’s website, derives revenue from sales of branded women’s, men’s and children’s footwear and accessories. The First Cost segment represents activities of a subsidiary which earns commissions for serving as a buying agent of footwear products to mass-market merchandisers, shoe chains and other off-price retailers with respect to their purchase of footwear. In the License segment, the Company licenses its Steve Madden® and Steven by Steve Madden® trademarks for use in connection with the manufacturing, marketing and sale of cold weather accessories, sunglasses, eyewear, outerwear, bedding, hosiery and women’s fashion apparel and jewelry.
Quarter ended,
|
|
Wholesale
Footwear
|
|
|
Wholesale
Accessories
|
|
|
Total
Wholesale
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
First
Cost
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to external customers
|
|
$ |
82,755 |
|
|
$ |
20,337 |
|
|
$ |
103,092 |
|
|
$ |
28,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
131,608 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
35,432 |
|
|
|
8,338 |
|
|
|
43,770 |
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,937 |
|
Commissions and licensing fees – net
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
4,946 |
|
|
$ |
1,238 |
|
|
|
6,184 |
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
16,741 |
|
|
|
3,055 |
|
|
|
19,796 |
|
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
4,946 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
24,859 |
|
Segment assets
|
|
$ |
195,389 |
|
|
$ |
73,031 |
|
|
|
268,420 |
|
|
|
51,953 |
|
|
|
35,597 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
355,970 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
404 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to external customers
|
|
$ |
65,201 |
|
|
$ |
16,084 |
|
|
$ |
81,285 |
|
|
$ |
26,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
107,429 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
25,802 |
|
|
|
5,176 |
|
|
|
30,978 |
|
|
|
12,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,487 |
|
Commissions and licensing fees – net
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
10,862 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
12,908 |
|
|
|
(5,509 |
) |
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
10,304 |
|
Segment assets
|
|
$ |
162,646 |
|
|
$ |
37,554 |
|
|
|
200,200 |
|
|
|
46,416 |
|
|
|
7,529 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
254,145 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
991 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
1,182 |
|
Revenues by geographic area for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
Quarter ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$ |
125,997 |
|
|
$ |
102,245 |
|
International
|
|
|
5,611 |
|
|
|
5,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
131,608 |
|
|
$ |
107,429 |
|
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this document.
This Quarterly Report contains certain forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the federal securities laws. The events described in forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report may not occur. Generally forward-looking statements relate to business plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of our plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits from acquisitions to be made by us, or projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings or other aspects of our operating results. The words “may”, “will”, “expect”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “project”, “plan”, “intend”, “estimate”, and “continue”, and their opposites and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are beyond our control, that may influence the accuracy of the statements and the projections upon which the statements are based. Factors that may affect our results include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Any one or more of these uncertainties, risks and other influences could materially affect our results of operations and whether forward-looking statements made by us ultimately prove to be accurate. Our actual results, performance and achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether from new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview:
($ in thousands, except retail sales data per square foot and earnings per share and per share data)
Steven Madden, Ltd. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “the Company”) designs, sources, markets and sells fashion-forward footwear for women, men and children. In addition, we design, source, market and sell name brand and private label fashion accessories, such as handbags and belts. We distribute products through department and specialty stores, our retail stores, our e-commerce website throughout the United States and through special distribution arrangements in Canada, Europe, Central and South America, Australia, Asia and Africa. Our product line includes a broad range of updated styles which are designed to establish or capitalize on market trends, complemented by core products. We have established a reputation for our creative designs, popular styles and quality products at accessible price points.
On March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a 3-for-2 stock split of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, to be effected in the form of a stock dividend on the Company’s outstanding common stock. Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 20, 2010 received one additional share of Steven Madden Ltd. common stock for every two shares of common stock owned on this date. The additional shares were distributed on May 3, 2010. Stockholders received cash in lieu of any fractional shares of common stock they otherwise would have received in connection with the dividend. All share and per share data provided herein gives effect to this stock split, applied retroactively.
On February 10, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of stock of privately held Big Buddha, Inc. (“Big Buddha”) from its sole stockholder (“Seller”). Founded in 2003, Big Buddha designs and markets fashion-forward handbags to specialty retailers and better department stores. We believe that Big Buddha is a strategic fit for our Company. The acquisition was completed for consideration of $11,029 in cash, net of cash acquired, subject to adjustment, plus contingent payments pursuant to an earn-out agreement with the Seller. The earn-out agreement provides for potential payments to the Seller based on the financial performance of Big Buddha handbags for each of the twelve-month periods ending on March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013. The fair value of the contingent payments was estimated using the present value of management’s projections of the financial results of Big Buddha during the earn-out period. As of March 31, 2010, the Company estimates the fair value of the contingent consideration to be $12,000.
We continued our trend of positive sales and earnings growth during the first quarter of 2010. Consolidated net sales for the first quarter of 2010 increased 23% to $131,608 compared to $107,429 in the first quarter of 2009. Our gross margin increased significantly in the first quarter of 2010 to 45.5%, an increase of 5% as compared to the 40.5% achieved in the first quarter of last year. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, net income increased 134% to $15,385 compared to $6,577 in the same period of last year. Diluted earnings per share increased to $0.55 per share on 28,155,000 diluted weighted average shares outstanding compared to $0.24 per share on 26,958,000 diluted weighted average shares outstanding in the first quarter of last year. Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $13,125 in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to $3,825 in the same quarter of last year.
In our Retail segment, same store sales (sales of those stores, including the e-commerce website, that were in operation throughout the first quarters of 2010 and 2009) increased 13.6%. As of March 31, 2010, we had 85 stores in operation, compared to 94 stores as of March 31, 2009. Sales per square foot increased to $672 in 2010 compared to sales per square foot of $639 achieved in 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, our total inventory decreased to $23,929 from $28,071 as of March 31, 2009 and the inventory turnover (calculated on a trailing twelve month average) increased to 10.4 times compared to 8.1 times last year. Our accounts receivable average collection days were 55 days in the first quarter of 2010 compared to 54 days during the same period of last year. As of March 31, 2010, we had $157,393 in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, no short or long-term debt, and total stockholders’ equity of $286,069. Working capital increased to $147,155 as of March 31, 2010, compared to $133,020 on March 31, 2009 primarily due to the accumulated net income earned during the twelve month period ended March 31, 2010.
The following tables set forth information on operations for the periods indicated:
Selected Financial Information
Three Months Ended
March 31
($ in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
CONSOLIDATED:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
131,608 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
107,429 |
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
71,671 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
63,942 |
|
|
60 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
59,937 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
43,487 |
|
|
40 |
|
Other operating income – net of expenses
|
|
|
6,184 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
3 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
41,262 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
36,088 |
|
|
34 |
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
24,859 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
10,304 |
|
|
9 |
|
Interest and other income – net
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
1 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
25,643 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
10,700 |
|
|
10 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
15,385 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6,577 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHOLESALE FOOTWEAR SEGMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
82,755 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
65,201 |
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
47,323 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
39,399 |
|
|
60 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
35,432 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
25,802 |
|
|
40 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
18,691 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
14,940 |
|
|
23 |
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
16,741 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
10,862 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHOLESALE ACCESSORIES SEGMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
20,337 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
16,084 |
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
11,999 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
10,908 |
|
|
68 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
8,338 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
5,176 |
|
|
32 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
5,283 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
19 |
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
3,055 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAIL SEGMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
28,516 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
26,144 |
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
12,349 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
13,635 |
|
|
52 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
12,509 |
|
|
48 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
17,288 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
18,018 |
|
|
69 |
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5,509 |
) |
|
(21 |
) |
Number of stores
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIRST COST SEGMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other commission income – net of expenses
|
|
$ |
4,946 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LICENSING SEGMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing income – net of expenses
|
|
$ |
1,238 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
100 |
% |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
($ in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Consolidated:
Net sales increased 23% to $131,608 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, from $107,429 for the comparable period of 2009. Overall gross profit margin increased five percentage points to 45.5% in the first quarter of 2010 from 40.5% in the first quarter of 2009. Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $41,262 compared to $36,088 in the same period last year. As a percentage of sales, operating expenses for the first quarter of 2010 decreased to 31.3% from 33.6% in the same period of last year, reflecting leverage gained from sales increases. Commission and licensing fee income increased to $6,184 in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $2,905 in the first quarter of 2009. Net income for the first quarter of 2010 increased 134% to $15,385 compared to net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of $6,577.
Wholesale Footwear Segment:
Net sales generated by the Wholesale Footwear segment accounted for $82,755 or 63%, and $65,201 or 61% of total Company net sales for the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The 27% increase in net sales quarter over quarter was driven by net sales increases in all divisions of our Wholesale segment. Our Steve Madden Men’s Division led the growth trend by posting a net sales increase of 52%. This net sales increase in Steve Madden Men’s is primarily due to the strong performance of the dress and casual shoe categories during the quarter. In addition, our new men’s line, Madden, has been met with a favorable response, and has contributed to the net sales growth in the Wholesale Footwear segment. The Madden Girl Division continued its growth trend by recording a 42% increase in net sales in the quarter. The net sales growth in Madden Girl is due to deeper market penetration combined with the success of the dress shoe, flat sandal and wedge categories. Net sales in our Steven Division increased by 28% in the first quarter of 2010, primarily due to an increase in shipments to the Steven Division’s largest customer Nordstrom, combined with strong casual boot sales during the quarter. A net sales increase of 8% in our International Division was propelled by the Division’s significant growth trend in Eastern Asia. Net sales in the Steve Madden Women’s Division increased by 4% primarily due to an expansion of our Dillard’s business combined with the strong performance of dress shoes during the quarter. The Elizabeth and James Division, our new brand that began shipping in the second quarter of 2009, contributed net sales of $2,667 in the first quarter of 2010. Finally, the transition of one of the Company’s mass merchant customers from a “first cost” model to a “wholesale” model contributed $1,581 of incremental net sales in the first quarter of 2010.
Gross profit margin in the Wholesale Footwear segment increased to 42.8% in the first quarter of this year from 39.6% in the same period last year, primarily due to a decrease in close out sales combined with an increase in initial margins and improved operating efficiencies. In the first quarter of 2010, operating expenses increased to $18,691, or 22.5% of net sales, compared to $14,940, or 22.9% of net sales, in the prior year, primarily due to the incremental expenses associated with our two new brands mentioned above. Income from operations for the Wholesale Footwear segment increased to $16,741 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 compared to $10,862 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.
Wholesale Accessories Segment:
Net sales generated by the Wholesale Accessories segment accounted for $20,337 or 15%, and $16,084 or 15% of total Company net sales for the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our two recent acquisitions contributed to the 26% increase in net sales quarter over quarter. Our new Madden Zone Division, which results from our July 2009 acquisition of Zone 88, contributed incremental net sales of $2,763 in the first quarter of 2010. On February 10, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of stock of privately held Big Buddha. From the date of acquisition through March 31, 2010, Big Buddha contributed net sales of $2,449. In addition, Steve Madden Handbags, Steven Belts and private label belts all achieved double-digit sales growth in the first quarter of 2010. These increases were partially offset by net sales decreases in our Betsey Johnson and Betseyville handbag product lines.
Gross profit margin in the Wholesale Accessories segment increased to 41.0% in the first quarter of this year from 32.2% in the same period last year, primarily due to the significantly higher gross profit margins achieved by our new Big Buddha Division and a change in the mix of products. In the first quarter of 2010, operating expenses increased to $5,283 compared to $3,130 in the prior year, primarily due to the incremental operating expenses associated with our new Madden Zone and Big Buddha divisions. Income from operations for the Wholesale Accessories segment increased to $3,055 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 compared to $2,046 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.
Retail Segment:
Net sales generated by the Retail segment accounted for $28,516, or 22%, and $26,144, or 24%, of total Company net sales for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We opened two new stores, closed eight under-performing stores and licensed three stores during the twelve months ended March 31, 2010. As a result, we had 85 retail stores as of March 31, 2010 compared to 94 stores as of March 31, 2009. The 85 stores currently in operation include 80 under the Steve Madden brand, four under the Steven brand and one e-commerce website. Comparable store sales (sales of those stores, including the e-commerce website, that were open throughout the first quarters of 2010 and 2009) increased 13.6% in the first quarter of this year primarily due to strong boot sales in the quarter. Gross profit as a percentage of sales improved significantly to 56.7% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to 47.8% achieved in the same period of 2009, primarily due to a decrease in promotional selling combined with improved operating efficiencies. In the first quarter of 2010, operating expenses decreased to $17,288, or 60.6% of net sales, compared to $18,018, or 68.9% of net sales, primarily due to a reduction in operating expenses associated with the nine fewer stores in operation in the first quarter of 2010 when compared to the same period of last year. Loss from operations for the Retail segment improved to $1,121 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 compared to $5,509 for the same period of 2009.
First Cost Segment:
The First Cost segment generated net commission income and design fees of $4,946 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, compared to $2,068 for the comparable period of 2009. This 139% growth in the First Cost Division was driven by a significant increase in revenues from Target, Kohl’s, JC Penney and K-mart.
Licensing Segment:
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, net licensing income increased to $1,238 from $837 in the same period of last year primarily due to sales increases achieved by several of our licensees, including significant sales growth of our bedding and outerwear licensees.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
($ in thousands)
On July 10, 2009, we entered into a collection agency agreement with Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (“Rosenthal”) that became effective on September 15, 2009. The agreement provides us with a credit facility in the amount of $30,000, having a sub-limit of $15,000 on the aggregate face amount of letters of credit, at an interest rate that, at our election, is tied to either the prime rate or LIBOR. The agreement can be terminated by Rosenthal at any time with 60 days’ prior written notice, or by us at any time after the expiration of the first contract year with 60 days’ prior written notice.
As of March 31, 2010, we had working capital of $147,155. We had cash and cash equivalents of $69,221, investments in marketable securities of $88,172 and we did not have any long term debt.
We believe that based upon our current financial position and available cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, we will meet all of our financial commitments and operating needs for at least the next twelve months.
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
($ in thousands)
Cash provided by operations increased by $9,300 to $13,125 in the first quarter of 2010 from $3,825 in the first quarter of last year. The increase was driven by the income growth in the first quarter of this year.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
($ in thousands)
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, we invested $6,332 in marketable securities and received $4,000 from the maturities and sales of securities. We also paid $11,029 for the acquisition of Big Buddha. Additionally, we made capital expenditures of $668, principally for the one new store opened in the current period and leasehold improvements to our showroom and for systems enhancements.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
($ in thousands)
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, net cash provided by financing activities was $859, which consisted of proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $332 and excess tax benefit from the exercise of options of $527.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
($ in thousands)
Our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
Remainder of
2010
|
|
|
2011-2012 |
|
|
2013-2014 |
|
2015 and after
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$ |
99,987 |
|
$ |
12,614 |
|
$ |
31,531 |
|
$ |
24,981 |
|
$ |
30,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
105,816 |
|
|
105,816 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent payment liability
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities (future minimum royalty payments)
|
|
|
7,209 |
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
4,374 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
225,012 |
|
$ |
120,365 |
|
$ |
43,405 |
|
$ |
30,381 |
|
$ |
30,861 |
|
At March 31, 2010, we had un-negotiated open letters of credit for the purchase of inventory of approximately $5,521.
We have an employment agreement with Steven Madden, our founder and Creative and Design Chief, which provides for an annual base salary of $600 subject to certain specified adjustments through December 31, 2019. The agreement also provides for annual bonuses based on EBITDA, revenue of any new business and royalty income over $2 million, plus an equity grant and a non-accountable expense allowance.
We have employment agreements with certain executive officers, which provide for the payment of compensation aggregating approximately $1,971 during the remaining nine months of 2010, $1,713 in 2011 and $1,211 in 2012. In addition, some of the employment agreements provide for a discretionary bonus and some provide for incentive compensation based on various performance criteria as well as other benefits including stock options. Our Chief Operating Officer is entitled to deferred compensation calculated as a percentage of his base salary.
In connection with our acquisition of Big Buddha during the first fiscal quarter of 2010, we are subject to potential earn-out payments to the seller of Big Buddha based on the annual performance of Big Buddha through March 31, 2013.
Virtually all of our products are produced at overseas locations, the majority of which are located in China, with a smaller percentage located in Mexico, Brazil, Italy, Spain and India. We have not entered into any long-term manufacturing or supply contracts with any of these foreign companies. We believe that a sufficient number of alternative sources exist outside of the United States for the manufacture of our products. We currently make approximately 99% of our purchases in U.S. dollars.
INFLATION
We do not believe that the inflation experienced over the last few years in the United Sates, where we primarily compete, has had a significant effect on the Company’s sales or profitability. Historically, we have minimalized the impact of product cost increases by improving operating efficiencies, changing suppliers and increasing prices. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to offset such inflationary cost increases in the future.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND THE USE OF ESTIMATES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates by their nature are based on judgments and available information. Our estimates are made based upon historical factors, current circumstances and the experience and judgment of management. Assumptions and estimates are evaluated on an ongoing basis and we may employ outside experts to assist in evaluations. Therefore, actual results could materially differ from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Management believes the following critical accounting estimates are more significantly affected by judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: allowance for bad debts, returns, and customer chargebacks; inventory reserves; valuation of intangible assets; litigation reserves and cost of sales.
Allowances for bad debts, returns and customer chargebacks. We provide reserves against our trade accounts receivables for future customer chargebacks, co-op advertising allowances, discounts, returns and other miscellaneous deductions that relate to the current period. The reserve against our non-factored trade receivables also includes estimated losses that may result from customers’ inability to pay. The amount of the reserve for bad debts, returns, discounts and compliance chargebacks are determined by analyzing aged receivables, current economic conditions, the prevailing retail environment and historical dilution levels for customers. We evaluate anticipated customer markdowns and advertising chargebacks by reviewing several performance indicators for our major customers. These performance indicators (which include inventory levels at the retail floors, sell through rates and gross margin levels) are analyzed by Management to estimate the amount of the anticipated customer allowance. Failure to correctly estimate the amount of the reserve could materially impact our results of operations and financial position.
Inventory reserves. Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market, on a first-in, first-out basis. We review inventory on a regular basis for excess and slow moving inventory. The review is based on an analysis of inventory on hand, prior sales, and expected net realizable value through future sales. The analysis includes a review of inventory quantities on hand at period-end in relation to year-to-date sales and projections for sales in the foreseeable future as well as subsequent sales. We consider quantities on hand in excess of estimated future sales to be at risk for market impairment. The net realizable value, or market value, is determined based on the estimate of sales prices of such inventory through off-price or discount store channels. The likelihood of any material inventory write-down is dependent primarily on the expectation of future consumer demand for our product. A misinterpretation or misunderstanding of future consumer demand for our product, the economy, or other failure to estimate correctly, in addition to abnormal weather patterns, could result in inventory valuation changes, either favorably or unfavorably, compared to the valuation determined to be appropriate as of the balance sheet date.
Valuation of intangible assets. ASC Topic 350, “Intangible – Goodwill and Other”, requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives no longer be amortized, but rather be tested for impairment at least annually. This pronouncement also requires that intangible assets with finite lives be amortized over their respective lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC Topic 360”). In accordance with ASC Topic 360, long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, leasehold improvements and goodwill subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Litigation reserves. Estimated amounts for litigation claims that are probable and can be reasonably estimated are recorded as liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The likelihood of a material change in these estimated reserves would be dependent on new claims as they may arise and the favorable or unfavorable events of a particular litigation. As additional information becomes available, management will assess the potential liability related to the pending litigation and revise their estimates. Such revisions in management’s estimates of a contingent liability could materially impact our results of operation and financial position.
Cost of sales. All costs incurred to bring finished products to our distribution center and, in the Retail segment, the costs to bring products to our stores, are included in the cost of sales line item on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. These include the cost of finished products, purchase commissions, letter of credit fees, brokerage fees, material and labor and related items, sample expenses, custom duty, inbound freight, royalty payments on licensed products, labels and product packaging. All warehouse and distribution costs are included in the operating expenses line item of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. We classify shipping costs to customers, if any, as operating expense. Our gross profit margins may not be comparable to other companies in the industry because some companies may include warehouse and distribution as a component of cost of sales, while other companies report on the same basis as we do and include them in operating expenses.
($ in thousands)
We do not engage in the trading of market risk sensitive instruments in the normal course of business. Our financing arrangements are subject to variable interest rates, primarily based on the prime rate and LIBOR. The terms of our collection agency agreements with Rosenthal & Rosenthal can be found in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section under Item 2 and in Note E to the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report.
As of March 31, 2010, we held marketable securities valued at $88,172, which consist primarily of corporate and U.S. government and federal agency bonds. These investments are subject to interest rate risk and will decrease in value if market interest rates increase. We have the ability to hold these investments until maturity. In addition, any decline in interest rates would be expected to reduce our interest income.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were, as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report, effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated our internal controls over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during the quarter covered by this report.
Certain legal proceedings in which we are involved are discussed in Part I, Item 3 of, and in Note L to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Unless otherwise indicated, all proceedings discussed in those earlier reports remain outstanding.
On June 24, 2009, a class action lawsuit, Shahrzad Tahvilian, et al. v. Steve Madden Retail, Inc. and Steve Madden, Ltd., Case No. BC 414217, was filed in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, against the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Steven Madden Retail, Inc. The complaint, which seeks unspecified damages, alleges violations of California labor laws, including, among other things, that the Company failed to provide mandated meal breaks to its employees and failed to provide overtime pay as required. The Company filed an answer in the litigation denying all allegations stated in the complaint. In March of 2010, the parties submitted the claim to private mediation and a resolution has been delayed until August 2010 pending further discovery. The Company, with the advice of legal counsel, has evaluated the liability in this case and believes that it is not likely to exceed $1,000,000. Accordingly, the Company accrued $1,000,000 in the fiscal year 2009. The accrual is subject to change to reflect the status of this matter.
We have been named as a defendant in certain other lawsuits in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, after consulting with legal counsel, the liabilities, if any, resulting from these matters should not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations. It is the policy of management to disclose the amount or range of reasonably possible losses in excess of recorded amounts.
3.1
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Steven Madden, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 23, 1998.
|
|
|
3.2
|
Amended & Restated By-Laws of Steven Madden, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2008).
|
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen Certificate for shares of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A, filed with the SEC on September 29, 1993).
|
|
|
4.2
|
Rights Agreement dated November 14, 2001 between the Company and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 16, 2001.
|
|
|
10.1
|
Employment Agreement dated May 30, 2008 between the Company and Amelia Newton Varela. *
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
|
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
* Filed herewith.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DATE: May 7, 2010
|
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ EDWARD R. ROSENFELD
|
|
|
Edward R. Rosenfeld
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ ARVIND DHARIA
|
|
|
Arvind Dharia
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
Exhibit Index
Exhibit |
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Steven Madden, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 23, 1998.
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended & Restated By-Laws of Steven Madden, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2008).
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Certificate for shares of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A, filed with the SEC on September 29, 1993).
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Rights Agreement dated November 14, 2001 between the Company and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 16, 2001.
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement dated May 30, 2008 between the Company and Amelia Newton Varela. *
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
* Filed herewith.