UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
(RULE
14a-101)
SCHEDULE
14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ________)
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant ¨
Check the
appropriate box:
x
Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
¨
Definitive Proxy Statement
¨
Definitive Additional Materials
¨
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
(Name of
Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x No fee
required
¨ Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
(1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applied:
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Total
fee paid:
|
|
|
|
¨ Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨ Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)
|
Amount previously paid:
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.
|
|
IEC
ELECTRONICS CORP.
105
NORTON STREET
NEWARK,
NEW YORK 14513
(315)331-7742
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be
Held On
February
4, 2009
Dear
Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the
annual meeting of stockholders of IEC Electronics
Corp. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 4, 2009
at 9:00 a.m. local time at our offices, 105 Norton Street, Newark, New York for
the following purposes:
|
1.
|
To
elect six (6) directors to serve until the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and
qualified.
|
|
2.
|
To
approve an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation to
effect an up to 1:4 reverse split of the common stock, as determined in
the sole discretion of the Company's board of
directors.
|
|
3.
|
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or
any adjournment thereof.
|
The record date for the annual meeting
is December 19, 2008. Only stockholders of record at the close of
business on that date may vote at the meeting or any adjournment
thereof. Our transfer books will not be closed .
By
Order of the Board of Directors
|
|
Martin
S. Weingarten,
|
Secretary
|
|
December
26, 2008
|
|
Newark,
New York
|
You
are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Whether or not
you expect to attend the meeting, please complete, date, sign and return the
enclosed proxy as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at
the meeting. Your vote is important, no matter how many shares you
owned on the record date. A return envelope is enclosed for your convenience and
needs no postage if mailed in the United States. Even if you have
voted by proxy, you may still vote in person if you attend the
meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record
by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the meeting, you must
obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder.
Notice
of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
1
|
Proxy
Statement for 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
3
|
Questions
and Answers about this Proxy Material and Voting
|
3
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
7
|
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
|
8
|
Proposal
1 - Election of Directors
|
9
|
Nominees
for Election as Directors
|
9
|
Information
Regarding the Board and its Committees
|
10
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
|
12
|
Corporate
Governance and Related Matters
|
12
|
Proposal
2 - Approval of Amendment to Our Certificate of Incorporation to Effect a
Reverse Stock Split
|
13
|
Overview
|
13
|
Reasons
for Reverse Stock Split
|
13
|
Board
Discretion to Implement the Reverse Stock Split
|
14
|
Certain
Risk Factors Associated with the Reverse Stock Split
|
15
|
Material
Effects of the Proposed Reverse Stock Split
|
15
|
Payment
of Fractional Shares
|
16
|
Authorized
Shares
|
16
|
Accounting
Matters
|
17
|
Potential
Anti-Takeover Effect
|
17
|
Procedure
for Effecting Reverse Stock Split; Effective Date
|
17
|
Exchange
of Stock Certificates
|
17
|
No
Appraisal Rights
|
18
|
Federal
Income Tax Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split
|
18
|
Reservation
of Rights
|
19
|
Vote
Required and Recommendation of Board of Directors
|
19
|
Compensation
of Named Executive Officers and Directors
|
19
|
Named
Executive Officers
|
19
|
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
|
19
|
Compensation
Committee Report
|
24
|
Executive
Officer Compensation Tables
|
24
|
Director
Compensation
|
27
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Person Transactions
|
28
|
Audit
Committee Report
|
29
|
Independent
Public Accountants
|
30
|
|
31
|
Appendix
A – Certificate of Amendment
|
A-1
|
IEC
ELECTRONICS CORP.
105
NORTON STREET
NEWARK,
NEW YORK 14513
(315)331-7742
PROXY
STATEMENT
FOR
2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THIS PROXY MATERIAL AND VOTING
Why
am I receiving these materials?
We are sending you this proxy statement
and the enclosed proxy card because the board of directors of IEC Electronics
Corp. (“IEC”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, “us”) is soliciting your proxy to vote
at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We invite you to attend the annual
meeting and request that you vote on the proposals described in this proxy
statement. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at
9 a.m. local time at our office, 105 Norton Street, Newark, New
York. However, you do not need to attend the meeting to vote your
shares. Instead, you may simply complete, date, sign and return the enclosed
proxy card.
We are mailing this proxy statement,
the accompanying proxy card, and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2008 (“Fiscal 2008”) on or about December 26,
2008 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the annual
meeting.
Who
can vote at the annual meeting?
Only stockholders of record at the
close of business on December 19, 2008, the record date for the meeting, will be
entitled to vote at the annual meeting. On December 4, 2008, there
were 8,932,437 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to
vote.
Stockholder of Record: Shares
Registered in Your Name
If on December 19, 2008, your shares of
IEC common stock were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent,
Registrar and Transfer Company, then you are a stockholder of record. As a
stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the meeting or vote by
proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to
fill out and return the enclosed proxy card to ensure your vote is
counted.
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in
the Name of a Broker or Bank
If on December 19, 2008, your shares of
IEC common stock were held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer or
other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in
“street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that
organization. The organization holding your account is considered the
stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual
meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your
broker or other agent on how to vote the shares in your account. You
are also invited to attend the annual meeting. However, since you are
not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the
meeting unless you request and obtain a signed letter or other valid proxy from
your broker or other agent.
What
am I voting on?
There are two matters scheduled for a
vote: the election of six directors to serve until the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and the approval of an amendment to the Company's Certificate of
Incorporation to effect an up to one-for-four reverse split of the common stock
as determined in the sole discretion of the board of directors. Our
board of directors does not intend to bring any other matters before the meeting
and is not aware of anyone else who will submit any other matters to be voted
on. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting,
the people named on the proxy card, or their substitutes, will be authorized to
vote on those matters in their own judgment.
How
many votes do I have?
On each matter to be voted upon, you
have one vote for each share of common stock you owned as of December 19,
2008.
What
is the quorum requirement?
A quorum of stockholders is necessary
to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if at least a
majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote are present at the
meeting. Your shares are counted as present at the meeting
if:
|
·
|
You
are present and vote in person at the meeting;
or
|
|
·
|
You
have properly submitted a proxy
card.
|
Your shares will be counted towards the
quorum only if you submit a valid proxy or vote in person at the
meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the
quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, a majority of the votes
present at the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another date.
How
do I vote?
The procedures for voting are set forth
below:
Stockholder of Record: Shares
Registered in Your Name
If you are a stockholder of record, you
may vote in person at the annual meeting or vote by proxy using the enclosed
proxy card. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge
you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still
attend the meeting and vote in person if you have already voted by
proxy.
|
·
|
To
vote in person, come to the annual meeting and we will give you a ballot
when you arrive.
|
|
·
|
To
vote using the proxy card, simply complete, date and sign the enclosed
proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If
you return your signed proxy card to us before the annual meeting, we will
vote your shares as you direct.
|
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in
the Name of Broker or Bank
If you hold your shares in “street
name” and thus are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your
broker, bank or other agent, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed
by your broker or other nominee. Your broker or other nominee has
enclosed or otherwise provided a voting instruction card for you to use in
directing the broker or nominee how to vote your shares. Check the voting form
used by that organization to see if it offers internet or telephone
voting. To vote in person at the annual meeting, you must obtain a
valid proxy from your broker, bank or other agent. Follow the
instructions from your broker or bank included with these proxy materials, or
contact your broker or bank to request a proxy form.
How
are votes counted?
You may either vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD”
authority to vote for each nominee for the board of directors. You
may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on any other proposals.
If you
submit your proxy but abstain from voting or withhold authority to vote on one
of more matters, your shares will be counted as present at the meeting for the
purpose of determining a quorum. Your shares also will be counted as
present at the meeting for the purpose of calculating the vote on the particular
matter with respect to which you abstained from voting or withheld authority to
vote.
If you abstain from voting on a
proposal, your abstention has the same effect as a vote against that proposal,
except, however, an abstention has no effect on the election of
directors.
If you hold your shares in street name
and do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your
shares will be considered to be “broker non-votes” and will not be voted on any
proposal on which your broker or other nominee does not have discretionary
authority to vote under the rules applicable to a nominee
holder. Shares that constitute broker non-votes will be counted as
present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum, but will not be
considered entitled to vote on the proposal in question. Under rules
applicable to a nominee holder, if your broker does not receive voting
instructions from you, it is permitted to vote your shares on Proposal 1
(election of directors) in its discretion but not on Proposal 2 (Approval of
Amendment to Company's Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse split of
the common stock).
How many votes are needed to
approve each Proposal?
|
·
|
Proposal 1 - Election of
directors
|
Directors
are elected by a plurality of the votes represented by the shares of common
stock present at the meeting in person or by proxy.
This
means that the six director nominees with the most affirmative votes will be
elected. Withheld votes, abstentions and broker non-votes will have
no effect.
|
·
|
Proposal 2 - Approval of Amendment to
Company's Certificate of Incorporation to Effect an up to 1:4 Reverse
Stock Split
|
Approval
is by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares issued and outstanding on
the record date. Abstentions are counted and have the effect of a
vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will be counted as a vote
against the proposal.
What
if I return a proxy card but do not make specific choices?
If you return a signed and dated proxy
card without marking any voting selections, the persons named as proxy holders
on the proxy card will vote in accordance with the recommendation of the board
of directors. The board's recommendation is set forth together with
the description of each proposal in this proxy statement. In summary,
the board recommends a vote:
|
·
|
for election of the
nominated slate of directors (see Proposal 1);
and
|
|
·
|
for approval of the
Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation (see Proposal
2).
|
With respect to any other matter that
properly comes before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by
the board of directors or, if no recommendation is given, in their own
discretion.
Can
I change my vote after submitting my proxy?
Yes. You can revoke your proxy at any
time before the final vote at the meeting. If you are a stockholder of record,
you may revoke your proxy in any one of three ways:
|
·
|
You
may submit another properly completed proxy card with a later
date.
|
|
·
|
You
may send a written notice that you are revoking your proxy to Secretary,
IEC Electronics Corp., 105 Norton Street, Newark, NY
14513.
|
|
·
|
You
may attend the annual meeting and vote in person. Simply attending the
meeting will not, by itself, revoke your
proxy.
|
If you hold your shares in street name,
contact your broker or other nominee regarding how to revoke your proxy and
change your vote.
How
can I find out the results of the voting at the annual meeting?
Preliminary voting results will be
announced at the annual meeting. Final voting results will be published in our
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ending March 27,
2009.
What
does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?
If you receive more than one proxy
card, your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in
different accounts. Please complete, date, sign and return each proxy card to
ensure that all of your shares are voted.
Who
is paying for this proxy solicitation?
IEC will pay for the entire cost of
soliciting proxies. In addition to these mailed proxy materials, our directors,
officers and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by
other means of communication. We will not pay our directors, officers and
employees any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. In addition, we
have retained the firm of InvestorCom, Inc., a professional solicitation firm,
to assist us in the distribution and solicitation of proxies, for a fee of
$4,000 plus expenses. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks
and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial
owners.
When
are stockholder proposals due for next year’s annual meeting?
At our annual meeting each year, our
board of directors submits to stockholders its nominees for election as
directors. In addition, the board of directors may submit other
matters to the stockholders for action at the annual meeting.
Our stockholders also may submit
proposals for inclusion in the proxy material. These proposals must
meet the stockholder eligibility and other requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). To be
considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy materials, you must submit your
proposal in writing by August 28, 2009 to our Secretary, IEC Electronics Corp.,
105 Norton Street, Newark, NY 14513.
In addition, our by-laws provide that a
stockholder may present from the floor a proposal that is not included in the
proxy statement if the stockholder delivers written notice to our Secretary not
less than 90 days prior to the date of the meeting. The notice must
set forth your name, address and number of shares of stock you hold, a
representation that you intend to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to
make the proposal, a description of the business to be brought before the
meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, any
material interest you have in the proposal, and such other information regarding
the proposal as would be required to be included in a proxy
statement. We have received no such notice for the 2009 annual
meeting. For the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders, written notice
must be delivered to our Secretary at our principal office, 105 Norton Street,
Newark, NY 14513, no later than October 23, 2009.
Our
by-laws also provide that if a stockholder intends to nominate a candidate for
election as a director, the stockholder must deliver written notice of such
intent to our Secretary. The notice must be delivered not less than
90 days before the date of a meeting of stockholders. The notice must
set forth your name and address and number of shares of stock you own, the name
and address of the person to be nominated, a representation that you intend to
appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person specified in
the notice, a description of all arrangements or understandings between such
stockholder and each nominee and any other person (naming such person) pursuant
to which the nomination is to be made by such stockholder, the nominee’s
business address and experience during the past five years, any other
directorships held by the nominee, the nominee's involvement in certain legal
proceedings during the past five years and such other information concerning the
nominee as would be required to be included in a proxy statement soliciting
proxies for the election of the nominee. In addition, the notice must
include the consent of the nominee to serve as a director if
elected. We have received no such notice for the 2009 annual
meeting. For the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders, written notice
must be delivered to our Secretary at our principal office, 105 Norton Street,
Newark, NY 14513, no later than October 23, 2009.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table shows the amount of
IEC’s common stock beneficially owned as of December 4, 2008 by (i) each person
who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock, (ii)
each of our directors, (iii) each of our incumbent executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table, and (iv) all of our directors, and executive
officers as a group. The information as to each person has been
furnished by such person, and, except as noted, each person named in the table
has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock
indicated as beneficially owned.
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Percent of Shares
|
|
Name of
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Owned(1)
|
|
|
Owned(1)
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.
Barry Gilbert*
|
|
|
553,201 |
(2) |
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
G. Brudek*
|
|
|
435,328 |
(3) |
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eben
S. Moulton*
|
|
|
379,550 |
(4) |
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
C. Rowe*
|
|
|
405,972 |
(5) |
|
|
4.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl
E. Sassano*
|
|
|
34,644 |
(6) |
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Justin
L. Vigdor*
|
|
|
256,900 |
(7) |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerold
L. Zimmerman*
|
|
|
86,384 |
(8) |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald
S. Doody
|
|
|
134,500 |
(9) |
|
|
1.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
T. Schlarbaum
|
|
|
227,000 |
(10) |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
R. Schlehr
|
|
|
9,308 |
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)
|
|
|
2,522,787 |
(11) |
|
|
26.54 |
% |
* Current
member of board of directors of IEC
+ Less
than 1%
|
(1)
|
The
number and percentage of shares beneficially owned are based on 8,932,437
shares outstanding and entitled to vote on December 4, 2008, adjusted as
required by rules promulgated by the Commission. In computing
the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage
ownership of that person, shares of common stock issuable pursuant to
options held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of December 4, 2008 (“options currently exercisable”) are
deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the
options. Such shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes
of computing the percentage ownership of any other
person.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
123,782 shares held by Mr. Gilbert’s wife and 275,000 shares subject to
options currently exercisable.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
375,000 shares held by Mr. Brudek's
wife.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes
23,332 shares subject to options currently
exercisable.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
257,231 shares held by Mr. Rowe’s 401(k) plan, 83,940 shares held by a
general partnership in which Mr. Rowe is a general partner and may be
deemed a beneficial owner, and 4,666 shares subject to options currently
exercisable.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes
11,666 shares subject to options currently
exercisable.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes
11,666 shares subject to options currently
exercisable.
|
|
(8)
|
Includes
45,000 shares owned by Mrs. Jerold L. Zimmerman and 10,999 shares subject
to options currently exercisable.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes
49,500 shares held by a trust for which Mr. Doody and his wife are
co-trustees and co-beneficiaries and 85,000 shares subject to options
currently exercisable.
|
|
(10)
|
Includes
17,000 shares held by Mr. Schlarbaum’s wife in her 401(k) plan and 150,000
shares subject to options currently
exercisable.
|
|
(11)
|
Includes
572,329 shares subject to options currently
exercisable.
|
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and persons
who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file
with the Commission reports of ownership and changes in ownership of common
stock and our other equity securities. Officers, directors and
greater than 10% stockholders are required by Commission regulation to furnish
the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Commission
regulations require the Company to identify any one who filed a required report
late during the most recent fiscal year. Based solely on review of
the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations
that no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008, we believe that, during Fiscal 2008, all of our directors and executive
officers complied with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a).
(Proposal
1)
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
The number of directors is established
by the board and is currently fixed at seven. Justin L. Vigdor, who
currently serves as a director, has retired from the board effective as of the
upcoming annual meeting. Mr. Vigdor has served as a director since
1968 and the Company is indebted to him for his 40 years of dedicated service,
support, business and legal counsel, wisdom, and commitment to IEC and its
stockholders.
At this annual meeting, six persons
will be nominated as directors. All the nominees for director, except
for Michael G. Brudek, were elected at the last annual meeting. Mr.
Brudek was elected by the board on November 19, 2008 to fill a vacancy on the
board and Mr. Brudek is being nominated as a director for election by the
stockholders for the first time at this annual meeting.
Following the annual meeting, there
will remain one vacancy on the board. The board intends to consider
potential candidates to fill the vacancy and, accordingly, has not taken any
action to reduce the size of the board.
It is intended that the accompanying
proxy will be voted in favor of the six persons listed below to serve as
directors unless the stockholder indicates to the contrary on the
proxy. All nominees have consented to serve if elected. We
expect that each of the nominees will be available for election, but if any of
them is not a candidate at the time the election occurs, it is intended that
such proxy will be voted for the election of another nominee to be designated by
the board to fill any such vacancy.
For the election of directors, only
proxies and ballots marked "FOR all nominees", "WITHHELD for all nominees" or
specifying that votes be withheld for one or more designated nominees are
counted to determine the total number of votes cast; votes that are withheld are
excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect. Abstentions
will have no effect on the vote for the election of
directors. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes
cast. This means that the six nominees will be elected if they
receive more affirmative votes than any other nominees.
The term of office of each person
elected as a director will continue until the next annual meeting or until his
successor has been elected and qualified, or until the director’s death,
resignation or removal.
The
Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election as directors
the nominees listed below.
Nominees
for Election as Directors
The names of the nominees, their ages
as of December 19, 2008, and certain information about their business experience
during the past five years and their directorships of other publicly held
corporations are set forth below.
W. Barry Gilbert, 62, has
served as our chief executive officer since January 2004 and served as acting
chief executive officer from June 2002 until that time. He has been a
director of the Company since February 1993 and chairman of the board since
February 2001. He is also an adjunct faculty member at the William E.
Simon Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of
Rochester. From 1991 until 1999, he was president of the Thermal
Management Group of Bowthorpe Plc. (now known as Spirent Plc) of Crawley, West
Sussex, England. Prior to that time he was corporate vice president
and president, Analytical Products Division of Milton Roy Company, a
manufacturer of analytical instrumentation. Mr. Gilbert has served on
a number of advisory boards for privately-held companies.
Michael G. Brudek, 65, was
elected a director by the board in November 2008 to fill a vacancy on the board
and is being nominated as a director for election by the stockholders for the
first time at this annual meeting. Mr. Brudek was the President and,
together with his wife, a majority stockholder of Val-U-Tech Corp., a wire and
cable harness interconnect business, in Victor, New York, from 1994 until its
acquisition by IEC on May 30, 2008. From May 30, 2008 until November
14, 2008, Mr. Brudek continued to serve as President of Val-U-Tech
Corp. Mr. Brudek was the co-founder and co-owner of Empire Treater
Rolls, Inc. in Fishers, New York, a manufacturer of glassed steel rolls for
surface treatment of plastic films and paper from 1987 until
1991. Prior to that time he held various sales and marketing
positions with The Pfaudler Co. in Rochester, New York, a manufacturer of
glass-lined process equipment for the chemical and pharmaceutical
industries.
Eben S. Moulton, 62, a
director since November 1992, has served as president of Seacoast Capital
Corporation, Danvers, Massachusetts, an investment firm, since 1994 and as
president of Signal Capital Corporation, Danvers, Massachusetts, a financial
services corporation, since 1988. Mr. Moulton is a director of
Seacoast Capital Corporation and Unitil Corporation, Hampton, New Hampshire, a
utility company. He is also a director of several privately-held
companies.
James C. Rowe, 60, a director
since January 7, 2000, has served as president of Rowe & Company LLC,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a merchant banking firm, since April 1994. From
April 1972 through March 1994, Mr. Rowe was a director and vice president of
Lubar & Co., Incorporated, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a merchant banking
firm. Mr. Rowe is a director of The PrivateBank, N.A., Milwaukee,
Wisconsin and also is a director of several privately held
companies.
Carl E. Sassano, 58, a
director since November 2006, has served as chairman of the board of Transcat,
Inc. since October 2003 and as a director of that company since October
2000. From March 2002 until April 2007, Mr. Sassano
was chief executive officer of Transcat, Inc. and from March 2002 until May
2006, Mr. Sassano was also president of Transcat, Inc., a distributor of
calibrators and test and measurement instruments, and a provider of calibration
and repair services located in Rochester, New York. Mr. Sassano was
president and chief operating officer of Bausch & Lomb Incorporated in 1999
and 2000 and held several other marketing and general management positions with
that company commencing in 1973. Mr. Sassano is a trustee of
Rochester Institute of Technology and a member of the board of directors of the
Rochester-based broadcaster WXXI. He is also a director of several
privately-held companies.
Jerold L. Zimmerman, 61, has
served as a director since January 2006. Dr. Zimmerman is the Ronald
L. Bittner Professor of Business Administration at the William E. Simon Graduate
School of Business Administration at the University of Rochester, where he has
taught finance, accounting and economics since 1974. He has published
numerous books and papers, and is a founding editor of the Journal of Accounting and
Economics. Dr. Zimmerman has a Ph.D. in Business
Administration from the University of California, Berkeley and a B.S. in Finance
from the University of Colorado.
Information
Regarding the Board and its Committees
Director
Meeting and Attendance
During Fiscal 2008, our board held four
in-person regular meetings and acted once by unanimous written consent. In
addition, the directors considered Company matters and had frequent
communication with the chairman of the board and others apart from the formal
meetings.
During Fiscal 2008, each incumbent
director attended at least 91% of the meetings of the board and the committees
upon which such director served.
Board
Independence
The board of directors has determined
that each of our directors, except Mr. Gilbert, who is an executive officer of
the Company, and Mr. Brudek, who was President of Val-U-Tech Corp. until
November 14, 2008, is an "independent director" within the meaning of Rule
4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ listing standards and applicable Commission rules and
regulations. See "Certain Relationships and Related Person
Transactions."
Board
Committees
Our board has three standing
committees: the audit committee, the compensation committee and the executive,
nominating and governance committee.
The audit committee oversees our
corporate accounting and financial reporting processes. It is responsible for
the appointment, dismissal, compensation and oversight of our independent
auditors, including the engagement of our auditors for the next fiscal year, the
review with the independent auditors and approval of the plan of the auditing
engagement, the review with the independent auditors of the results of their
audit, the review of the scope and results of the evaluation of our procedures
for internal auditing, the inquiry as to the adequacy of our internal accounting
controls and our disclosure controls and procedures, the approval of audit and
non-audit services to be provided to us by the independent auditors, and
overseeing compliance matters for us. The audit committee also
reviews with management and the independent auditors our annual report on Form
10-K and the interim financial statements prior to the filing of our quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q. The audit committee also monitors compliance
with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our conflict of interest policy,
our policy concerning trading in our securities and our related person
transactions policy. The minutes of audit committee meetings, as well
as all of the recommendations of the audit committee, are submitted to the full
board. In Fiscal 2008, the audit committee, whose current members are
Messrs. Rowe (Chairman), Vigdor and Zimmerman, held six meetings. The
board of directors in its business judgment has determined that each member of
the audit committee is “independent” as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the
NASDAQ listing standards and that Mr. Rowe qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the
Commission. For the audit committee's report relating to Fiscal 2008,
see "Audit Committee Report." The committee's charter, which sets
forth more specifically the duties and responsibilities of the audit committee,
is available on our website at www.iec-electronics.com.
The compensation committee
oversees the development and administration of our executive compensation plans,
reviews and approves the compensation for all executives other than the chief
executive officer, reviews and recommends to the board the compensation of the
chief executive officer, reviews and approves performance goals and objectives
with respect to incentive plans for all executives, oversees the evaluation of
the chief executive officer, reviews and recommends to the board the terms of
any employment, severance, change in control, termination or retirement
arrangements for all executives, and reviews and recommends to the board the
compensation paid to directors. In addition, the compensation
committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing with management the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis that SEC rules require be included in our
annual proxy statement and prepares the committee's report that the Commission
rules require be included in our annual proxy statement. In Fiscal
2008, the compensation committee held three meetings. The current
members of the compensation committee are Messrs. Sassano (Chairman), Moulton,
and Zimmerman, and each has been determined by the board to be "independent" as
defined in the NASDAQ listing standards. The compensation committee's
charter, which sets forth more specifically the duties and responsibilities of
the committee, is available on our website at www.iec-electronics.com. For
more information on executive officer and director compensation and the role of
the compensation committee, see "Compensation of Named Executive Officers and
Directors."
The executive, nominating and governance
committee exercises the powers of the board in the interval between
regular meetings of the full board, identifies and recommends to the board
individuals to serve as directors and as nominees for election as directors of
the Company, and develops, recommends and reviews corporate governance
principles applicable to the Company. In Fiscal 2008, the committee,
whose current members are Messrs. Moulton (Chairman), Gilbert, Rowe and Vigdor,
did not formally meet. Its functions were handled by the full
board. The board has determined that all of the members of the
committee, except Mr. Gilbert, are "independent" as defined in the NASDAQ
listing standards. It is anticipated that in fiscal 2009 the board
will establish a new nominating committee, all of whose members will be
"independent". The executive, nominating and governance committee
charter, which sets forth more specifically the duties and responsibilities of
the committee, is available on our website at www.iec-electronics.com.
Nominating
Process
The process followed by the executive,
nominating and governance committee to identify and evaluate candidates includes
requests to board members, the chief executive officer, and others for
recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information
and background material relating to potential candidates and their
qualifications, and interviews of selected candidates. Nominations of
persons for election to our board may be made at a meeting of stockholders only
(i) by or at the direction of the board or (ii) by any stockholder who has
complied with the notice procedures set forth in our bylaws and in the section
entitled “Questions and Answers About This Proxy Material and Voting – When are
stockholder proposals due for next year’s annual meeting?”. In
addition, stockholders who wish to recommend a prospective nominee for the
executive, nominating and governance committee’s consideration should submit the
candidates’ name and qualifications to Corporate Secretary, IEC Electronics
Corp., 105 Norton St., Newark, NY 14513.
In evaluating the suitability of
candidates to serve on the board of directors, including stockholder nominees,
the executive, nominating and governance committee seeks candidates who are
independent pursuant to the NASDAQ independence standards and meet certain
selection criteria established by the committee. The committee also
considers an individual's skills, character and professional ethics, judgment,
leadership experience, business experience and acumen, familiarity with relevant
industry issues, and other relevant criteria that may contribute to our
success. This evaluation is performed in light of the skill set and
other characteristics that would most complement those of the current directors,
including the diversity, maturity, skills and experience of the board as a
whole.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of our compensation
committee: (1) was an officer or employee of the Company during Fiscal 2008; (2)
was formerly an officer of the Company; or (3) had any relationship requiring
disclosure in this proxy statement pursuant to Commission rules.
In addition, none of our executive
officers served: (1) as a member of the compensation committee (or other board
committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such
committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose
executive officers serve on our compensation committee; (2) as a director of
another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our compensation
committee; or (3) as a member of the compensation committee (or other board
committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such
committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose
executive officers served as a director of our Company.
Corporate
Governance and Related Matters
Code
of Ethics
For a number of years, we have had a
code of ethics for our employees, officers and directors. During
Fiscal 2004, we adopted a revised version of our code of ethics, the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our directors, officers
(including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and other senior
financial officers) and employees. In Fiscal 2004, we also adopted a
whistleblower policy.
We make available to the public various
corporate governance information on our website (www.iec-electronics.com)
under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance”. Information on our
website includes our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Audit Committee
Charter, the Compensation Committee Charter, the Executive, Nominating and
Governance Committee Charter, our Related Person Transactions Policy, and our
Whistleblower Policy. Information regarding any amendments to, or
waiver from, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will also be posted on our
website.
Communications
with the Board of Directors
Stockholders and other parties may
communicate directly with the board of directors or the relevant board member by
addressing communications to:
[Name of
director(s) or Board of Directors]
IEC
Electronics Corp.
c/o
Corporate Secretary
105
Norton Street
Newark,
NY 14513
All stockholder correspondence will be
compiled by our corporate secretary and forwarded as appropriate.
Director
Attendance at Annual Meetings
We typically schedule a board of
directors meeting in conjunction with our annual meeting of stockholders and,
while we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance at annual meetings, we
as a general matter expect that the directors will attend the annual
meeting. Each of our then incumbent directors, except Mr. Rowe whose
plane was cancelled because of adverse weather conditions, attended the 2008
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Proposal
2
APPROVAL
OF AMENDMENT TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
TO
EFFECT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
Overview
The stockholders are being asked to
approve an up to 1:4 reverse stock split of the Company's outstanding common
stock (the "Reverse Stock Split"). The board has adopted a resolution
(i) declaring the advisability of an up to 1:4 Reverse Stock Split subject to
stockholder approval, (ii) in connection therewith, amending the Company's
certificate of incorporation to effect such a Reverse Stock Split, subject to
stockholder approval, and (iii) authorizing any other action it deems necessary
to effect such a reverse stock split, without further approval or authorization
of the stockholders, at any time before the date of the 2010 annual
stockholder meeting. If the proposed Reverse Stock Split is approved,
the Company's board would have the discretion to elect, as it determines to be
in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, to effect the Reverse
Stock Split at any exchange ratio up to 1:4 (1:2, 1:3 or 1:4) at any time before
the Company's 2010 annual stockholder meeting. The board may elect
not to implement the approved Reverse Stock Split at its sole
discretion. The board believes that approval of a proposal granting
this discretion to the board provides the board with appropriate flexibility to
achieve the purposes of the Reverse Stock Split, if implemented, and to act in
the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
The text of the form of proposed
amendment to the Company's certificate of incorporation is attached to this
proxy statement as Appendix
A. By approving this amendment, stockholders will approve an
amendment to the Company's certificate of incorporation pursuant to which any
whole number of shares up to four shares of common stock would be combined into
one share of common stock. The board may also elect not to do any Reverse Stock
Split.
Reasons
for the Reverse Stock Split
The board
of directors believes that the Reverse Stock Split may be desirable for a number
of reasons. First, the board believes that the Reverse Stock Split may better
enable us to list our common stock on a national exchange. Second, the board
believes that the Reverse Stock Split could improve the marketability and
liquidity of our common stock while we continue to progress towards achieving
our business objectives.
Our
common stock is currently quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board ("OTC
Bulletin Board"). The board believes that it is in the best interests of the
Company and its stockholders to list our common stock on a national exchange.
Alternative markets like the OTC Bulletin Board or the "pink sheets" maintained
by the Pink OTC Markets, Inc. are generally considered to be less efficient and
not as widely followed as other exchanges like those operated by NASDAQ or the
American Stock Exchange.
In order
for us to list our common stock on NASDAQ Capital Market, we must satisfy
certain listing standards, one of which requires a minimum bid price of $4.00
per share. As of December 1, 2008, the high bid price for our common stock as
reported on the OTC Bulletin Board was $1.60 per share. We believe that this is
the only initial listing standard that we do not meet in order for us to list
our stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
The board
believes that the Reverse Stock Split may help us satisfy the minimum bid price
listing standards of a national exchange. However, the effect of the Reverse
Stock Split upon the market price of our common stock cannot be predicted with
any certainty, and the history of similar reverse stock splits for companies in
like circumstances is varied. It is possible that the per share price of our
common stock after the Reverse Stock Split will not rise in proportion to the
reduction in the number of shares of our common stock outstanding resulting from
the Reverse Stock Split, and even if it does rise in proportion there can be no
assurance that the market price per post-Reverse Stock Split share will remain
at that level for a sustained period of time. The market price of our common
stock may be based also on other factors that may be unrelated to the number of
shares outstanding, including investors' perceptions of our future performance.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, our ability to list our stock on a national
exchange is subject to numerous requirements other than a minimum share price,
including income and market capitalization requirements and certain corporate
governance requirements, such as having a majority of independent board
members. Accordingly, even if our share price were to rise as a
result of the Reverse Stock Split, there can be no assurance that we would be
able to list our stock on a national exchange such as the NASDAQ Capital
Market.
The board
also believes that any increase in the market price of our common stock as a
result of implementing the Reverse Stock Split may improve the marketability and
liquidity of our common stock. Because of the trading volatility often
associated with low-priced stocks, many brokerage houses and institutional
investors have internal policies and practices that either prohibit them from
investing in low-priced stocks or tend to discourage individual brokers from
recommending low-priced stocks to their customers. Some of those policies and
practices may function to make the processing of trades in low-priced stocks
economically unattractive to brokers. Additionally, because brokers' commissions
on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price
than commissions on higher-priced stocks, the current average price per share of
our common stock can result in individual stockholders paying transaction costs
representing a higher percentage of their total share value than would be the
case if the share price were substantially higher. It should be noted that the
liquidity of our common stock may be adversely affected by the proposed Reverse
Stock Split given the reduced number of shares that would be outstanding after
the Reverse Stock Split. The board believes, however, that any higher market
price may reduce, to some extent, the negative effects on the liquidity and
marketability of our common stock that may result from some of the policies and
practices of institutional investors and brokerage houses described
above.
Board
Discretion to Implement the Reverse Stock Split
The
Reverse Stock Split will be effected, if at all, only upon a determination by
the board that the Reverse Stock Split (with an exchange ratio determined by the
board as described above) is in the best interests of the Company and its
stockholders. The determination by the board as to whether the Reverse Stock
Split will be effected, if at all, will be based upon certain factors, including
meeting the listing requirements for a national exchange like The NASDAQ Capital
Market, existing and expected marketability and liquidity of our common stock,
prevailing market conditions and the likely effect on the market price of our
common stock. If the board determines to effect the Reverse Stock Split, the
board will consider certain factors in selecting the specific exchange ratio,
including the overall market conditions at the time and the recent trading
history of our common stock. However, there can be no assurance that
any Reverse Stock Split that the board may elect to effect will have the desired
consequences.
Notwithstanding
approval of the Reverse Stock Split by the stockholders, the board may, in its
sole discretion, abandon the proposed amendment and determine not to effect the
Reverse Stock Split prior to the date of the 2010 annual stockholder
meeting. If the board fails to implement the Reverse Stock Split
prior to the date of the 2010 annual stockholder meeting, stockholder approval
again would be required prior to implementing the Reverse Stock Split
thereafter.
Certain
Risk Factors Associated with the Reverse Stock Split
There
can be no assurance that the total market capitalization of IEC common stock
(the aggregate value of all IEC common stock outstanding at the then market
price) after the proposed Reverse Stock Split will be equal to or greater than
the total market capitalization before the proposed Reverse Stock Split or that
the per share market price of IEC common stock following the Reverse Stock Split
will either equal or exceed the current per share market price.
There can
be no assurance that the market price per post-split share of IEC common stock
will remain unchanged or increase in proportion to the reduction in the number
of pre-split shares of IEC common stock outstanding before the Reverse Stock
Split. For example, based on the market price of IEC common stock on December 8,
2008 of $1.70 per share, if the board decided to implement the Reverse Stock
Split and selects a Reverse Stock Split ratio of one-for-four there can be no
assurance that the post-split market price of IEC common stock would be $6.80
per share or greater.
If
the Reverse Stock Split is effected, the resulting per-share stock price may not
attract institutional investors or investment funds and may not satisfy the
investing guidelines of such investors and, consequently, the trading liquidity
of IEC common stock may not improve.
While the
board believes that a higher stock price may help generate investor interest,
there can be no assurance that the Reverse Stock Split will result in a
per-share price that will attract institutional investors or investment funds or
that such share price will satisfy the investing guidelines of institutional
investors or investment funds. As a result, the trading liquidity of IEC common
stock may not necessarily improve.
A decline
in the market price of IEC common stock after the Reverse Stock Split may result
in a greater percentage decline than would occur in the absence of a reverse
stock split, and the liquidity of IEC common stock could be adversely affected
following such a Reverse Stock Split.
If the
Reverse Stock Split is effected and the market price of IEC common stock
declines, the percentage decline may be greater than would occur in the absence
of a Reverse Stock Split. The market price of IEC common stock will, however,
also be based on IEC's performance and other factors, which are unrelated to the
number of shares outstanding. Furthermore, the liquidity of IEC common stock
could be adversely affected by the reduced number of shares that would be
outstanding after the Reverse Stock Split.
Material
Effects of the Proposed Reverse Stock Split
The proposed Reverse Stock Split would
affect all our stockholders uniformly and would not affect any stockholders
percentage ownership interest in us, except to the extent that the Reverse Stock
Split results in any of our stockholders owning a fractional share as described
below. Proportionate voting rights and other rights and preferences
of the holders of our common stock would not be affected by the proposed Reverse
Stock Split, subject to the treatment of fractional shares. For
example, a holder of 2% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of common
stock immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split would continue to hold 2% of
the voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock immediately after the
Reverse Stock Split. The number of stockholders of record would not
be affected by the proposed Reverse Stock Split, subject to the treatment of
fractional shares.
Although
the proposed Reverse Stock Split will not affect the rights of stockholders or
any stockholder's proportionate equity interest in the Company, subject to the
treatment of fractional shares, the number of authorized shares of common stock
and preferred stock will not be reduced. This may significantly
increase the ability of the board to issue authorized and unissued shares
without further stockholder action, subject to the rules of any exchange on
which the Company's common stock may be listed. The issuance in the
future of such additional authorized shares may have the effect of diluting the
earnings per share and book value per share, as well as the stock ownership and
voting rights, of the currently outstanding shares of common
stock. The effective increase in the number of authorized but
unissued shares of common stock may be construed as having an anti-takeover
effect by permitting the issuance of shares to purchasers who might oppose a
hostile takeover bid or oppose any efforts to amend or repeal certain provisions
of our Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws.
The proposed Reverse Stock Split would
reduce the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise
of our outstanding stock options in proportion to the exchange ratio of the
Reverse Stock Split and will effect a proportionate increase in the exercise
price of such outstanding stock options. Also, the number of
shares reserved for issuance under any existing stock option plan would be
reduced proportionately based on the ratio of the Reverse Stock
Split.
If the proposed Reverse Stock Split is
implemented, it will increase the number of stockholders who own "odd lots" of
less than 100 shares of our common stock and decrease the number of stockholders
who own "whole lots" of 100 shares or more of our common
stock. Brokerage commission and other costs of transactions in odd
lots are generally higher than the costs of transactions of more than 100 shares
of common stock. In addition, certain listing standards of exchanges
like those operated by NASDAQ or the American Stock Exchange may require that we
have a certain minimum number of holders of whole lots.
Our common stock is currently
registered under Section 12(g) of the 1934 Act and we are subject to the
periodic reporting and other requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the "Exchange Act"). The proposed Reverse Stock Split will not
affect the registration of the common stock under the Exchange Act.
Payment
of Fractional Shares
No fractional shares of our
common stock will be issued as a result of any Reverse Stock
Split. Instead, stockholders who otherwise would be entitled to
receive fractional shares of common stock because they hold a number of shares
not evenly divisible by the applicable ratio, upon surrender to the transfer
agent of the certificates representing such fractional shares, shall be entitled
to receive cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of any such
fractional shares as described below.
In lieu of issuing fractional shares,
we may either: (i) directly pay each stockholder who would otherwise be entitled
to receive a fractional share an amount in cash equal to the closing stock price
of our common stock, as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board the day after the
Reverse Stock Split becomes effective, multiplied by the fractional share
amount, or (ii) make arrangements with our transfer agent to aggregate all
fractional shares otherwise issuable in the Reverse Stock Split and sell these
whole shares as soon as possible after the effective date at then prevailing
market prices on the open market on behalf of those holders, and then pay each
such holder its ratable portion of the sale proceeds.
Authorized
Shares
The
Reverse Stock Split would affect all issued and outstanding shares of IEC common
stock and outstanding rights to acquire IEC common stock. Upon the effectiveness
of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of authorized shares of IEC common stock
that are not issued or outstanding would increase due to the reduction in the
number of shares of IEC common stock issued and outstanding based on the Reverse
Stock Split ratio selected by the board. As of December 1, 2008, we had
50,000,000 shares of authorized common stock and 9,342,958 shares of common
stock issued and outstanding. We will continue to have 500,000 authorized shares
of preferred stock. Authorized but unissued shares will be available for
issuance, and we may issue such shares in the future. If we issue additional
shares, the ownership interest of holders of IEC common stock will be
diluted.
Accounting
Matters
The
Reverse Stock Split will not affect the par value of IEC common stock. As a
result, as of the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, the stated capital
attributable to IEC common stock on its balance sheet will be reduced
proportionately based on the Reverse Stock Split ratio selected by the board,
and the additional paid-in capital account will be credited with the amount by
which the stated capital is reduced. The per-share net income or loss and net
book value of IEC common stock will be restated because there will be fewer
shares of IEC's common stock outstanding.
Potential
Anti-Takeover Effect
Although
the increased proportion of unissued authorized shares to issued shares could,
under certain circumstances, have an anti-takeover effect (for example, by
permitting issuances that would dilute the stock ownership of a person seeking
to effect a change in the composition of the board or contemplating a tender
offer or other transaction for the combination of IEC with another company), the
Reverse Stock Split proposal is not being proposed in response to any effort of
which we are aware to accumulate IEC's shares of common stock or obtain control
of IEC, nor is it part of a plan by management to recommend to the board and
stockholders a series of amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation. Other
than the Reverse Stock Split proposal, the board does not currently contemplate
recommending the adoption of any other amendments to our Certificate of
Incorporation that could be construed to affect the ability of third parties to
take over or change the control of IEC.
Procedure
for Effecting Reverse Stock Split; Effective Date
Exchange
of Stock Certificates
As of the effective date of the Reverse
Stock Split, each certificate representing shares of common stock before the
Reverse Stock Split would be deemed, for all corporate purposes, to evidence
ownership of the reduced number of shares of common stock resulting from the
Reverse Stock Split, except that holders of unexchanged shares would not be
entitled to receive any dividends or other distributions payable by the Company
after the effective date until they surrender their old stock certificates for
exchange. All shares, underlying options and warrants and other
securities would also be automatically adjusted on the effective
date.
The Company's transfer agent, Registrar
and Transfer Company, would act as the exchange agent for purposes of
implementing the exchange of stock certificates. As soon as
practicable after the effective date, stockholders and holders of securities
convertible into common stock would be notified of the effectiveness of the
Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders of record would receive a letter of
transmittal requesting them to surrender their stock certificates for stock
certificates reflecting the adjusted number of shares as a result of the Reverse
Stock Split. Persons who hold their shares in brokerage accounts or
"street name" would not be required to take any further actions to effect the
exchange of their certificates. No new certificates would be issued
to a stockholder until such stockholder has surrendered the outstanding
certificate(s) together with the properly completed and executed letter of
transmittal to the exchange agent. Until surrender, each certificate
representing shares before the Reverse Stock Split would continue to be valid
and would represent the adjusted number of shares based on the exchange ratio of
the Reverse Stock Split, rounded up to the nearest whole share.
Stockholders
should not destroy any stock certificate and should not submit any certificates
until they receive a letter of transmittal.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under the
General Corporation Law of the state of Delaware, our stockholders are not
entitled to appraisal rights with respect to the Reverse Stock Split, and we
will not independently provide stockholders with any such right.
Federal
Income Tax Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split
The
following is a summary of certain material United States federal income tax
consequences of the Reverse Stock Split, does not purport to be a complete
discussion of all of the possible federal income tax consequences of the Reverse
Stock Split and is included for general information only. Further, it does not
address any state, local or foreign income or other tax consequences. Also, it
does not address the tax consequences to holders that are subject to special tax
rules, such as banks, insurance companies, regulated investment companies,
personal holding companies, foreign entities, nonresident alien individuals,
broker-dealers and tax-exempt entities. The discussion is based on the
provisions of the United States federal income tax law as of the date hereof,
which is subject to change retroactively as well as prospectively. This summary
also assumes that the pre-Reverse Stock Split shares were, and the post-Reverse
Stock Split shares will be, held as a "capital asset," as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") (i. e., generally,
property held for investment). The tax treatment of a stockholder may vary
depending upon the particular facts and circumstances of such stockholder. Each
stockholder is urged to consult with such stockholder's own tax advisor with
respect to the tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split. As used herein, the
term United States holder means a stockholder that is, for federal income tax
purposes: a citizen or resident of the United States; a corporation or other
entity taxed as a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States, any State of the United States or the District of Columbia; an
estate the income of which is subject to federal income tax regardless of its
source; or a trust if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over
the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority
to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
The
proposed Reverse Stock Split is intended to constitute a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368 of the Code. Assuming the Reverse Stock
Split qualifies as a reorganization, then, other than with respect to any cash
payments received in lieu of fractional shares discussed below, no gain or loss
will be recognized by a stockholder upon his or her exchange of pre-Reverse
Stock Split shares for post-Reverse Stock Split shares. The aggregate
tax basis of the post-Reverse Stock Split shares received in the Reverse Stock
Split (including any fraction of a new share deemed to have been received) will
be the same as the stockholder's aggregate tax basis in the pre-Reverse Stock
Split shares exchanged therefor. The stockholder's holding period for
the post-Reverse Stock Split shares will include the period during which the
stockholder held the pre-Reverse Stock Split shares surrendered in the Reverse
Stock Split.
A
stockholder who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share that would otherwise
be issued in the Reverse Stock Split will be deemed for federal income tax
purposes to have first received the fractional share, with a basis and holding
period determined in accordance with the foregoing paragraph. The
stockholder will then be deemed to have sold that fractional share back to the
Company for the cash actually received. The receipt of cash in the
deemed sale of a fractional share will result in a taxable gain or loss equal to
the difference between the amount of cash received and the holder's adjusted
federal income tax basis in the fractional share. Gain or loss will
generally be a capital gain or loss. Capital gain of a noncorporate
United States holder is generally taxed at a lower rate than non-capital gain
where the property has a holding period of more than one
year. Deduction of capital losses is subject to
limitation.
No gain
or loss will be recognized by the Company as a result of the Reverse Stock
Split.
Our view
regarding the tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split is not binding on the
Internal Revenue Service or the courts. ACCORDINGLY, EACH STOCKHOLDER SHOULD
CONSULT WITH HIS OR HER OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO ALL OF THE POTENTIAL TAX
CONSEQUENCES TO HIM OR HER OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT.
Reservation
of Rights
We reserve the right to abandon the
Reverse Stock Split without further action by our stockholders at any time
before the filing of the Certificate of Amendment to our Certificate of
Incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State, even if the Reverse Stock
Split has been authorized by our stockholders at the annual meeting, and by
voting in favor of a Reverse Stock Split you are expressly also authorizing us
to determine not to proceed with the Reverse Stock Split if we should so
decide.
Vote
Required and Recommendation of Board of Directors
The
affirmative vote of a majority of all outstanding shares of IEC common stock
entitled to vote on this proposal will be required for approval of this
proposal. As a result, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of
votes against the proposal. YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A
VOTE "FOR" THE PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF IEC TO
EFFECT AN UP TO 1:4 REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AS DETERMINED BY THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS.
COMPENSATION
OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Named
Executive Officers
This proxy statement contains
information about the compensation paid to our named executive officers during
Fiscal 2008. For Fiscal 2008, we determined that the following
officers were our named executive officers for purposes of this proxy
statement:
|
·
|
W.
Barry Gilbert - chairman and chief executive
officer
|
|
·
|
Jeffrey
T. Schlarbaum - executive vice president and president of IEC contract
manufacturing
|
|
·
|
Donald
S. Doody – senior vice president of
operations
|
|
·
|
Michael
R. Schlehr – vice president and chief financial
officer
|
|
·
|
Brian
H. Davis – former vice president and chief financial
officer
|
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Objective of the Compensation
Program
The goal of our executive compensation
program is to support the attainment of our long and short-term strategic and
financial objectives, thereby aligning the interests of the Company’s executives
with the interests of shareholders. Our executive compensation
program is intended to provide a competitive compensation program that enables
us to attract, motivate, and retain the key executives required to enhance
shareholder value.
What is the Company’s Approval and
Decision Making Process
The Compensation Committee
(“Committee”) approves and recommends to the full board all compensation
decisions regarding our directors and chief executive officer and approves all
compensation decisions regarding our other named executive
officers. The Committee generally approves equity awards for the
Company’s other employees, although the Committee has delegated to the Company’s
chief executive officer the authority to award at his discretion up to a
specified number of stock options to non-executive employees for special
performance or recruitment to the Company. In Fiscal 2008, this
number totaled 34,000 and represented approximately 20% of all stock options
granted to employees during Fiscal 2008.
In order
to maintain market competitiveness the Committee periodically reviews relevant
competitive data provided by third party compensation professionals for the
purpose of ensuring the compensation structure is designed to achieve the stated
objectives. In Fiscal 2008, the Company engaged Grahall Partners LLC,
a leading provider of compensation consulting services and survey data, to
assist the Committee in reviewing total compensation for our named executive
officers and other key employees. Services included an executive
compensation review and presentation of an overview of executive compensation
trends and developments to the Committee.
Grahall conducted a competitive
analysis of the total compensation of our named executive
officers. This was done on a functional and rank basis using both
proxy and survey data. The survey data was based on functional match
to technology firms with less than $50 million in revenue. The proxy
data included three benchmarks: a current peer group consisting of companies in
the EMS industry, comparable in size to IEC; an aspiration group, consisting of
companies identified by IEC as competitors for business and/or executive talent;
and a geographic group, consisting of small manufacturing companies in diverse
industries located in the Syracuse, Rochester and Buffalo area.
For
Fiscal 2008, the Committee determined that the peer, aspiration and geographic
groups would consist of the following companies:
Peer
Group
|
|
Aspiration
Group
|
|
Geographic
Group
|
Cherokee
International Corp.
|
|
CTS
Corp.
|
|
Anaren
Inc.
|
Cyberoptics
Corp.
|
|
EMS
Technologies Inc.
|
|
Astronics
|
Data
I/O Corp Daio
|
|
Key
Tronic Corp.
|
|
Graham
Corp.
|
Elecsys
Corp Asy
|
|
La
Barge Inc.
|
|
Performance
Technologies Inc.
|
Entorian
Technologies Inc
|
|
LGL
Group Inc.
|
|
Servotronics
Inc.
|
Intricon
Corp
|
|
Merix
Corp.
|
|
Taylor
Devices Inc.
|
Maxwell
Technologies Inc.
|
|
Performance
Technologies Inc.
|
|
Ultralife
Batteries Inc.
|
Netlist
Inc.
|
|
Raven
Industries Inc.
|
|
|
Sigmatron
International Inc.
|
|
Sparton
Corp.
|
|
|
Winland
Electronics Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
For
Fiscal 2008, the actual total compensation of our chief executive officer was
significantly below the median for our benchmarks and that of our other named
executive officers was at the median.
During
Fiscal 2008, the Committee received direct access to Grahall’s executive
compensation consultant and has reserved, and periodically exercised the right
to discuss any executive compensation topic with the Grahall consultant without
any management involvement.
How are the Executives
Compensated
The compensation program for the named
executive officers consists of the following elements:
|
·
|
Base
salary compensation;
|
|
·
|
Annual
incentive compensation;
|
|
·
|
Long-term
incentive compensation and
|
|
·
|
In-service
employment benefits
|
Base Salary Compensation
Base salaries are used to provide a
fixed amount of compensation for the named executive officer's regular
work. The salaries of the named executive officers are reviewed on an
annual basis, as well as at the time of promotion or other change in
responsibilities. Salary ranges have been developed for each position
using internal comparability and external market data collected through
Grahall. The ranges are based on the responsibilities and scope of
each position and experience, skills, and leadership capabilities required to
perform each position.
For the named executive officers, other
than the chief executive officer, the chief executive officer prepares a salary
recommendation following a review of individual performance, competitive market
data, and affordability for the Company. The recommendation is
presented to the Committee. The Committee relies in part on the chief
executive officer’s evaluation of each other named executive officer’s
performance in deciding whether to make an adjustment to each executive’s salary
in a given year. In the case of a change in role, careful
consideration is given to the new responsibilities, external pay practices and
internal peer comparisons, in addition to past performance and
experience.
With respect to the base salary of the
chief executive officer, the board considers individual and Company performance,
as well as external market practices, prior to recommending any
changes. In the past several years, the chief executive officer has
requested the board to maintain a modest base salary. The board
therefore tied a significant portion of the chief executive officer's cash
compensation via the annual incentive compensation to the financial objectives
of the organization (see below).
All compensation changes are effective
on January 1st of each year. For Fiscal 2008, there was no adjustment
in the chief executive officer’s base salary. Base salary increases
for our other named executive officers varied from 3.5% to 6.0%. The
increases were determined by the Committee based upon the factors discussed
above, competitive conditions, and the Committee’s view of each officer’s
duties, responsibilities and performance.
Annual Cash Incentive
Awards
Our
named executive officers may be awarded annual cash bonuses under our annual
incentive plan (“Plan”). The Plan rewards executives and management
for overall company performance with respect to increase in revenue and
earnings, improved cash flow, and improvement in on-time delivery to our
customers. We believe this variable performance plan aligns the
interests of our named executive officer with our shareholders' interest in
improving the financial strength of the Company as it continues to
grow.
The Fiscal 2008 target and actual cash
incentive awards as a percentage of salary to be paid to each of our named
executive officers are shown in the table below. The actual cash
incentive awards are also shown in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation"
column of the Summary Compensation Table in the Executive Compensation Tables
section which follows this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Name
|
|
Target payout as
a % of salary
|
|
|
Payout range
as a % of
salary
|
|
|
Threshold
Award
|
|
|
Target
Bonus
Award
|
|
|
Maximum
Award
|
|
|
Actual Cash
Award
|
|
|
Actual
Award as a
% of Salary
|
|
Mr.
Gilbert
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
0%
- 90 |
% |
|
$ |
31,125 |
|
|
$ |
93,375 |
|
|
$ |
186,750 |
|
|
$ |
47,349 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Mr.
Schlarbaum
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
0%
- 80 |
% |
|
$ |
29,625 |
|
|
$ |
79,000 |
|
|
$ |
158,000 |
|
|
$ |
41,752 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Mr.
Doody
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
0%
- 70 |
% |
|
$ |
20,938 |
|
|
$ |
58,625 |
|
|
$ |
117,250 |
|
|
$ |
31,342 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Mr.
Schlehr (1)
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
0%
- 70 |
% |
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
54,250 |
|
|
$ |
112,438 |
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Mr.
Davis (2)
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
0%
- 70 |
% |
|
$ |
18,750 |
|
|
$ |
52,500 |
|
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
— |
|
(1) As
part of his offer of employment, Mr. Schlehr was guaranteed a minimum award of
$35,000.
(2) Mr.
Davis resigned as an employee effective February 15, 2008. In order
to receive an award, an executive officer must be an employee of the Company on
the date the award is to be distributed.
The
actual cash incentive award is determined by the Committee by comparing each
named executive officer’s level of achievement against his individual financial
and strategic performance objectives and as a result may be less than or greater
than the target bonus amount.
Long-Term Equity Incentive
Awards
Equity based compensation and ownership
is intended to ensure that our named executive officers have a continuing stake
in the long-term success of the Company. The Committee believes that
stock options and other methods of equity based incentive compensation are
critical in motivating the long-term creation of shareholder
value. There is no set formula for the award of options under the
2001 Plan. Factors considered by the Committee in making option
awards to any named executive officers include:
·
|
His
position within the Company;
|
·
|
Competitive
market data provided by outside
consultants;
|
·
|
The
importance in retaining the named executive
officer;
|
·
|
His
past and expected future contributions to the
Company;
|
·
|
His
history of past awards;
|
·
|
His
time in current position; and
|
·
|
Any
changes in his responsibility and
scope.
|
The
Company’s stock options are awarded at the closing price of the Company’s stock
on the date of grant and vest over various periods. Stock option
grants provide an incentive that focuses the executive’s attention on managing
the Company from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the
business.
In
February 2008, Mr. Schlehr was granted an incentive stock option upon being
hired. The options vest 50% on February 17, 2011 and 50% February 17,
2012.
In May
2008 the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Schlarbaum and Mr. Doody restricted
stock awards to reflect their recent promotions. The Committee
granted restricted stock to provide an additional type of equity-based long-term
compensation, further aligning those executives’ interests with the interests of
our shareholders. The Committee believed the granting of restricted
stock would further promote a long-term ownership perspective and thus retention
of those executives.
On
January 23, 2008 the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the performance
stock option grants issued on May 11, 2005 to Mr. Schlarbaum and Mr. Doody and
on July 13, 2005 to Mr. Gilbert, to provide additional retention
incentives. The original grants were subject to vesting and exercise
upon achieving performance goals for fiscal years ending September 30, 2008,
2009, and 2010. As amended, the grants (to the extent not already vested at
September 30, 2007) shall vest and be exercisable as follows: 50% on May 11,
2009 (except in the case of Mr. Gilbert which date shall be July 13, 2009) and
50% on May 11, 2010 (except in the case of Mr. Gilbert which date shall be July
13, 2010).
Benefits and Perquisites
Our named
executive officers are eligible for the same benefits available to our employees
generally. In Fiscal 2008, the Company provided a car allowance
to Mr. Schlarbaum due to his travel to customer locations. There are
no additional perquisites offered to our named executive officers.
Retirement Benefits
All employees, including our named
executive officers, are eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k) Employee
Savings Plan (“Savings Plan”). The Savings Plan is a defined
contribution tax-qualified retirement savings plan pursuant to which employees
are able to contribute a portion of their eligible cash compensation to the
Savings Plan. The Company does not match employee contributions.
Selection and Balance of Components
of Compensation
The Committee, with recommendations
from the chief executive officer, determines the mix and balance of our
compensation elements by considering data provided by our external compensation
consultant and internal equity. In general, the amount of base
salary, potential bonus, and potential stock-based compensation for each
executive officer is chosen to achieve our objectives of meeting the Company’s
business goals, attracting and retaining top quality executives, and enhancing
the interests of our stockholders.
Employment,
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements
We do not have employment or change in
control arrangements with any of our named executive officers. We
have entered into severance arrangements with Mr. Schlehr and Mr. Doody,
pursuant to their offers of employment. Mr. Doody’s arrangement
expires on November 14, 2009; there is no expiration date for Mr. Schlehr’s
arrangement. Our 2001 Plan provides that upon a change in control, unless the
board otherwise determines, all outstanding options will immediately become
fully vested and exercisable.
The table below reflects the amount
payable to Mr. Schlehr and Mr. Doody in the event of termination of his
employment for any reason other than gross misconduct.
Name
|
|
Severance (1)
|
|
|
Continuation of Insurance
Benefits
|
|
Donald
S. Doody
|
|
$ |
84,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,457.70 |
|
Michael
R. Schlehr
|
|
$ |
77,500 |
|
|
$ |
4,457.70 |
|
(1) Payment
of six months salary based on executive's annual base salary as of September 30,
2008 and does not reflect any applicable payroll taxes.
Brian
Davis resigned his employment effective February 15, 2008 and under the terms of
his offer letter he was entitled to severance in the amount of
$75,296. The Company has agreed to allow Mr. Davis to take any or all
of his severance in the form of future health care coverage as a retiree under
IEC’s group health plan for as long as the funds cover the
costs. Should Mr. Davis become eligible for health insurance
elsewhere he may cancel his coverage and request payment for the balance of the
severance owed within 30 business days of written notice to the
Company. Pursuant to the separation agreement we entered into with
Mr. Davis at he time of his resignation, the vesting of options to purchase an
aggregate of 20,000 shares was accelerated and options to purchase an additional
20,000 shares were cancelled, subject in each case to Mr. Davis’s performance of
his obligations under the independent consulting agreement we entered into with
him in connection with his resignation. The severance agreement also extended
the exercisability of options to purchase an aggregate of 75,000 shares through
their expiration dates.
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code generally limits the corporate tax deduction for compensation paid to the
named executive officers to $1,000,000 each. However, compensation is
exempt from this limit if it qualifies as "performance-based
compensation". The committee has carefully considered the impact of
this tax code provision and our normal practice is to take such action as is
necessary to preserve our tax deduction. Our 2001 Plan complies with
the provisions of Section 162(m). Accordingly, any gains realized
upon the exercise of stock options granted under the Plan will qualify as
"performance-based compensation" and will be fully deductible by
us. We believe that all of our compensation expense for Fiscal 2008
will be deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Although we will continue to consider
deductibility under Section 162(m) with respect to future compensation
arrangements with executive officers, deductibility will not be the sole factor
used in determining appropriate levels or methods of
compensation. Since our objectives may not always be consistent with
the requirements for full deductibility, we may enter into compensation
arrangements under which payments are not deductible under Section
162(m). It is not expected that the compensation of any named
executive officer will exceed $1,000,000 in Fiscal 2009.
Compensation
Committee Report
The compensation committee, which is
composed entirely of independent directors, has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K
with management and based on such review and discussions, the compensation
committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
Compensation
Committee:
|
|
|
|
Carl
E. Sassano, Chairman
|
|
Eben
S. Moulton
|
|
Jerold
L. Zimmerman
|
The information contained in the above
compensation committee report shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or
"filed" with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically
incorporate it by reference to such filings.
Executive
Officer Compensation Tables
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth
information concerning total compensation earned or paid to our named executive
officers for Fiscal 2008.
Name & Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)(1)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(2)
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
W.
Barry Gilbert
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
196,643 |
|
|
0 |
|
$ |
127,050 |
|
$ |
47,349 |
|
$ |
17,365 |
(3) |
|
$ |
388,407 |
|
Chairman
& CEO
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
184,336 |
|
|
0 |
|
$ |
9,669 |
|
$ |
77,220 |
|
$ |
17,365 |
(3) |
|
$ |
288,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
T. Schlarbaum
Executive
VP and
Pres.
of IEC
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
203,301
|
|
$ |
7,875
|
|
$ |
0
|
|
$ |
41,752
|
|
$ |
12,500 |
(4) |
|
$ |
265,428
|
|
Contract
Mfg.
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
188,653 |
|
|
0 |
|
$ |
14,500 |
|
$ |
69,875 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
273,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald
S. Doody
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
166,175
|
|
$ |
6,300
|
|
$ |
4,875
|
|
$ |
31,342
|
|
$ |
13,000 |
(4) |
|
$ |
221,692
|
|
Senior
VP of Operations
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
157,668 |
|
|
0 |
|
$ |
15,375 |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
207,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
R. Schlehr
Vice
President & CFO (5)
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
92,587 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
$ |
5,000 |
(6) |
|
$ |
132,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian
T. Davis (7)
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
59,542
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,800
|
|
|
0
|
|
$ |
80,296 |
(8) |
|
$ |
145,638
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
141,092 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,800 |
|
$ |
41,206 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
186,097 |
|
(1)
|
The
amounts disclosed in this column represent the expense we recorded in
accordance with SFAS 123R during the year indicated for the fair value of
equity based awards granted in that year as well as in prior years and
does not represent actual cash compensation paid to our named executive
officers. A discussion of the assumptions used to calculate the
grant date fair value is set forth in Note 1 (Business and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 6 (Stock Based Compensation) to
the Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2008.
|
(2)
|
The
amounts shown reflect cash payments made to the named executive officers
in November of the indicated year based on our annual performance
incentive plan (see "Compensation Discussion and
Analysis").
|
(3)
|
Represents
a premium paid in lieu of salary on a long-term care insurance contract
for Mr. Gilbert and his wife, in accordance with Section 7702B of the
Internal Revenue Code.
|
(4)
|
Represents
amount payable to reimburse the executive for the income tax liability
resulting from the award of restricted
stock.
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Schlehr joined the Company on February 18,
2008.
|
(6)
|
Represents
a signing bonus paid to Mr. Schlehr upon
hire.
|
(7)
|
Mr.
Davis resigned on February 15,
2008.
|
(8)
|
Represents
$75,296 in severance payable to Mr. Davis upon his resignation and a
$5,000 consulting fee paid to Mr. Davis to assist in management
consultations and the transition of Mr. Schlehr into the
organization.
|
GRANTS
OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding awards for Fiscal 2008
under the 2001 Plan.
Name
|
|
Award Type
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
All other stock
awards: Number
of shares of
stock or units
(#)
|
|
|
All other
option awards:
Number of
securities
underlying
options
(#)
|
|
|
Exercise or
base price of
option awards
($/Sh)
|
|
|
Grant date fair
value of stock
and option
awards (3)
|
|
Jeffrey
T. Schlarbaum
|
|
Restricted
Stock (1)
|
|
5/14/08
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,875 |
(4) |
Donald
S. Doody
|
|
Restricted
Stock (1)
|
|
5/14/08
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,300 |
(4) |
Michael
R. Schlehr
|
|
Incentive
Stock Option (2)
|
|
2/18/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
(1)
|
The
restricted stock awards were granted under the 2001 Plan, and are subject
to a two-year restriction period during which time the stock cannot be
sold or otherwise transferred in any
manner.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Schlehr was granted an incentive stock option upon being
hired. The options vest 50% on February 17, 2011 and 50%
February 17, 2012.
|
|
(3)
|
Amounts
reflected in the “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards” column
reflect the amount recognized for financial statement purposes in Fiscal
2008 in accordance with SFAS 123(R) for equity award expense based
upon the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the grant
date as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board ($2.10). These amounts reflect
the Company’s accounting expense for these awards and do not correspond to
the actual value that may be recognized by the named executive officers.
Whether and to what extent a named executive officer realizes value will
depend on various factors, including actual operating performance, stock
price fluctuations and the named executive officer’s continued
employment.
|
|
(4)
|
The
Company also agreed to reimburse the executive for the income tax
liability resulting from the award of restricted stock. See
"Summary Compensation Table."
|
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END
The following table sets forth
information concerning stock options and stock awards held by the named
executive officers at September 30, 2008.
|
|
Option awards
|
|
Stock awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Equity
incentive plan
awards:
number of
unearned
shares, units or
other rights
that have not
vested
(#)
|
|
|
Equity
incentive
plan awards:
market or
payout value
of unearned
shares, units
or other
rights that
have not
vested
($)
|
|
W. Barry
Gilbert
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
.95 |
|
3/31/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,340 |
|
|
|
66,660 |
(1) |
|
$ |
.55 |
|
7/12/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
T. Schlarbaum
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.01
|
|
5/03/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
(1) |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
5/10/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
(3) |
|
$ |
28,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald
S. Doody
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
.51
|
|
11/14/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
(1) |
|
$ |
.53 |
|
5/10/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
(3) |
|
$ |
22,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
R. Schlehr
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
2/17/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian
H. Davis
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
.21 |
|
3/16/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
10/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
5/12/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
5/10/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Incentive
stock options vest 50% on May 11, 2009 (except in the case of Mr. Gilbert
which date would be July 13, 2009) and 50% on May 11, 2010 (except in the
case of Mr. Gilbert which date would be July 13, 2010).
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Schlehr was granted an incentive stock option upon being hired. The
options vest 50% on February 17, 2011 and 50% February 17,
2012.
|
(3)
|
The
restricted stock awards were granted under the 2001 Plan, and are subject
to a two-year restriction period during which time the stock cannot be
sold or otherwise transferred in any
manner.
|
2008
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The following table sets forth
information concerning exercises of stock options by named executive officers
during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.
Option
Awards
Name
|
|
Number of Shares Acquired on
Exercise (#)
|
|
|
Value Realized on Exercise ($)
|
|
W.
Barry Gilbert
|
|
|
33,340 |
|
|
$ |
44,009 |
|
Brian
H. Davis
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,900 |
|
Pension
Benefits
None of our named executive officers is
covered by a pension plan or other similar benefit that provides for payments or
other benefits.
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation
None of our named executive officers
are covered by a defined contribution or other plan that provides for the
deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified.
Director
Compensation
How Directors are
Compensated
Employee directors do not receive
additional compensation for serving on the board beyond the compensation they
received for serving as officers of the Company, as described under “Executive
Compensation.”
The Company uses a combination of cash
and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified
candidates to serve on the board. In setting non-employee director
compensation the board considers the amount of time that directors expend in
fulfilling their duties to the Company as well as the skill-level required by
the Company of members of the board.
Cash Compensation Paid to Non-Employee
Directors
The following table shows non-employee
director compensation as determined by the board upon the recommendation of the
compensation committee.
Annual
Board Retainer (1)
|
$12,000,
payable in cash or stock
|
Annual
Committee Chair Retainer
|
$3,000
|
Board
Meeting Fee
|
$1,000,
payable in stock
|
Reimbursement
for expenses incurred in attending board
meetings
|
Equity Compensation Paid to
Non-Employee Directors
Our 2001 Plan authorizes the granting
to non-statutory stock options to non-employee directors in such amounts and at
such times as may be determined by the board. A non-statutory stock
option ("NSO") for 7,000 shares was granted to each of the non-employee
directors on January 23, 2008 at an exercise price of $1.70 per share (the
closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date as reported
on the OTC Bulletin Board). The NSOs vest in three equal installments
as follows: 1/3 after six months, 1/3 after one year, and the balance after two
years.
Director Compensation
Table
The following table summarizes the cash
and equity compensation for non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008.
Name(1)
|
|
Fees Earned
Paid in Cash ($) or Stock (2)
|
|
|
Option Awards(3)
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Eben
S. Moulton (4)
|
|
$ |
19,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,898 |
|
|
$ |
24,898 |
|
James
C. Rowe (4)
|
|
$ |
18,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,898 |
|
|
$ |
23,898 |
|
Carl
E. Sassano (5)
|
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
5,898 |
|
|
$ |
23,398 |
|
Justin
L. Vigdor
|
|
$ |
16,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,898 |
|
|
$ |
21,898 |
|
Jerold
L. Zimmerman
|
|
$ |
16,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,898 |
|
|
$ |
21,898 |
|
(1)
|
W.
Barry Gilbert, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, is not included in
this table as he is an employee of the Company and receives no
compensation for his services as a
director.
|
(2)
|
The
fees set forth in this column represent fees paid in cash or stock. Mr.
Zimmerman has elected to receive his annual board retainer in stock; all
directors have elected to receive their board meeting fees in stock. The
number of shares given to a director in payment of the board meeting fee
is determined by dividing $1,000 by the closing price of the Company's
common stock on the date of the board meeting. The number of
shares given to a director in payment of the quarterly retainer fee is
determined by dividing $3,000 by the closing price of the Company's common
stock on the first trading day after the close of the
quarter.
|
(3)
|
The
amounts disclosed in this column represent the expense we recorded in
accordance with SFAS 123R during Fiscal 2008 for the fair value of stock
options granted in Fiscal 2008 as well as in prior years and does not
represent actual cash compensation paid to the directors. A discussion of
the assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value is set forth
in Note 1 (Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and
Note 6 (Stock-Based Compensation) to the Financial Statements in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008.
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Moulton and Mr. Rowe received an annual retainer for serving as Committee
Chairs throughout the fiscal year.
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Sassano was named the Chair of the Compensation Committee at the January
Shareholder Meeting.
|
Non-employee
directors are provided term life insurance in the amount of
$50,000.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
At its November 2007 meeting, our board
adopted a written policy addressing the Company's procedures with respect to the
review, approval and ratification of transactions with related persons that are
required to be disclosed pursuant to Commission rules. The policy
provides that any transaction, arrangement or relationship with a "related
person" (as defined in the policy) in which the Company participates and in
which the related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest
and which exceeds $90,000 will be subject to review, approval or ratification by
the audit committee.
On May 30, 2008, the Company acquired
all the stock of Val-U-Tech Corp. for $10.4 million. Mr. Brudek, a
nominee for director, was President of Val-U-Tech Corp. and, together with his
wife, owned 80% of the stock of Val-U-Tech Corp. As consideration for
the sale of their stock, Mr. Brudek and his wife received $4.4 million in cash,
$3.043 million in the form of IEC's promissory notes ("Seller Notes"), and
400,000 shares of IEC common stock. The Seller Notes bear interest at
the rate of 4% per annum. Payments of principal and interest will be
made in 20 equal quarterly installments beginning September 1,
2008. On September 1, 2008 Mr. Brudek and his wife received $172,553
under the Seller Notes. At the time of the acquisition, Mr. Brudek
entered into employment and non-competition agreements with the
Company. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Brudek continued
as the President of Val-U-Tech Corp. He resigned as President of
Val-U-Tech Corp. on November 14, 2008 and the employment agreement was
terminated at that time. From May 29, 2008 through September 30,
2008, the Company paid $49,058 to Mr. Brudek as salary.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
Membership
and Role of Audit Committee
The audit committee of our board is
responsible for providing independent, objective oversight and review of our
accounting functions, internal controls and financial reporting
process. Throughout Fiscal 2008, the audit committee was comprised of
Messrs. Rowe, Zimmerman and Vigdor. The Audit Committee operates
pursuant to a written charter adopted by the board of directors which was
amended and restated in August 2006 and may be found on our public website www.iec-electronics.com
under the “Investor Relations-Corporate Governance” section. We
believe that each of the members of the audit committee is independent as
defined by applicable laws and regulations.
Management has the primary
responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including
our system of internal controls, and for the preparation of the consolidated
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Our independent accountants are responsible for
performing an independent audit of those financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards and to issue a report
thereon. The audit committee’s responsibility is to monitor and
oversee these processes on behalf of the board. The members of the
audit committee are not professional accountants or auditors and their functions
are not intended to duplicate or certify the activities of management and the
independent auditors.
Review
of our Audited Financial Statements
In fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities, the audit committee reviewed the audited financial statements
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K with management and discussed the quality and
acceptability of our accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant
judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in our financial
statements.
The audit committee reviewed with the
independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the
conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted
accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality and acceptability of
our accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed
with the committee under generally accepted auditing standards, including the
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communications with Audit
Committees). In addition, the audit committee has discussed with the
independent auditors the auditors’ independence from management and us,
including the matters in the written disclosures required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independent Discussions with Audit Committees),
which were submitted to us, and considered the compatibility of non-audit
services with the auditors’ independence.
The audit committee discussed with our
independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audit. The
audit committee met with the independent auditors, with and without management
present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of our
internal controls, and the overall quality of our financial
reporting.
In reliance on these reviews and
discussions, the audit committee recommended to our board of directors (and our
board has approved) that our audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008 be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2008 for filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Audit
Committee:
|
|
|
|
James
C. Rowe, Chairman
|
|
Justin
L. Vigdor
|
|
Jerold
L. Zimmerman
|
The
information contained in the above Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed
“soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we
specifically incorporate it by reference into such filings.
INDEPENDENT
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Rotenberg & Co., LLP has been IEC’s
public accountant since May 2002 and the audit committee has selected Rotenberg
& Co., LLP as our independent auditors for Fiscal 2009. A
representative of Rotenberg & Co., LLP is expected to attend the annual
meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires,
and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from
stockholders.
The audit committee has determined that
the rendering of non-audit services by Rotenberg and Co., LLP as described
below, is compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence. In
accordance with its charter and pursuant to pre-approval policies established by
the audit committee, the audit committee approves in advance all audit services
and permitted non-audit services to be performed by the Company’s independent
public accountants before the firm is engaged to render such
services. In Fiscal 2008, all services were pre-approved by the audit
committee in accordance with this policy.
Fees
paid to Rotenberg & Co., LLP
The
following table shows the fees that were billed by Rotenberg & Co., LLP for
professional services rendered in Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007.
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
Audit
Fees
|
|
$ |
66,500 |
|
|
$ |
66,500 |
|
Audit-Related
Fees
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Tax
Fees
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
All
Other Fees
|
|
|
43,588 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Total
Rotenberg & Co., LLP Fees
|
|
$ |
115,088 |
|
|
$ |
81,500 |
|
Audit fees primarily represent amounts
billed for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements for such
fiscal years and the reviews of the financial statements included in our Form
10-Q quarterly reports for such fiscal years.
Audit-related fees represent
consultations concerning internal control documentation and financial accounting
and reporting standards.
Tax fees consist of professional
services rendered by Rotenberg & Co., LLP primarily in connection with IEC’s
tax compliance activities and the preparation of federal and state income tax
returns.
All other fees in Fiscal 2007 are for
audit services related to our 401(k) plan. All other fees in Fiscal
2008 are for audit services related to our 401(k) plan ($6,500) and for audit
and accounting ($37,088) services related to the Company's acquisition of
Val-U-Tech Corp. in Fiscal 2008.
OTHER
MATTERS
The board of directors knows of no
other matters that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting,
but if other matters properly come before the meeting, the persons named as
proxies in the enclosed proxy will vote according to their best
judgment. Stockholders are requested to date and sign the enclosed
proxy and to mail it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid
envelope. If you attend the annual meeting, you may revoke your proxy
at that time and vote in person, if you wish. Otherwise your proxy
will be voted for you.
By
Order of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
Martin
S. Weingarten,
|
Secretary
|
DATED: December
26, 2008
Newark, New York
We
will make available at no cost, upon your written request, a copy of our annual
report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2008 (without
exhibits) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Copies of exhibits to our Form 10-K will be made
available, upon your written request and payment to us of the reasonable costs
of reproduction and mailing. Written requests should be made to:
Michael R. Schlehr, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, IEC Electronics
Corp., 105 Norton Street, Newark, NY 14513.
Appendix
A
CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT
OF
THE
CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION
OF
IEC
ELECTRONICS CORP.
Under
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law
IEC Electronics Corp., a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that:
FIRST: The Board of
Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting held on November 19, 2008, duly
adopted resolutions setting forth a proposed amendment to the Corporation’s
Certificate of Incorporation and declaring said amendment to be advisable, and
calling a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation for consideration of
said amendment. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment
is as follows:
RESOLVED,
that the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation be amended by adding a new
subsection to the end of Section B of Article FOURTH of the Corporation’s
Certificate of Incorporation referred to as “5. Reverse Stock Split of the
Common Stock” that reads as follows:
5. Reverse Stock Split of the
Common Stock. Effective at 6:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the
filing date of the certificate of amendment adding this Subsection 5 to the
Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation (the “Reverse Stock Split Effective
Time”), each _____ shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share, outstanding at the Reverse Stock Split Effective Time shall, without any
action on the part of the holder thereof, automatically be reclassified and
changed into one share of the Corporation’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share; provided, however, that (i) if the foregoing reverse stock split of the
Corporation’s Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”) would result in any
holder of the Corporation’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, having a
fraction of a share of the Corporation’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share,
after the number of shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share, held by such holder are recalculated to give effect to the Reverse Stock
Split (a “Fractional Share”), then such Fractional Share shall, without any
action on the part of the holder thereof, automatically be canceled in the
Reverse Stock Split; and (ii) in the Reverse Stock Split, each Fractional Share
shall automatically be converted into the right to receive the Trading Value (as
defined below) thereof upon surrender by the holder thereof of the certificate
or certificates representing such Fractional Share. For purposes
hereof, the term “Trading Value” of each Fractional Share shall mean the product
of: (A) the closing price, as reported by the Over the Counter
Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), per share of the Corporation’s Common Stock, par value
$.01 per share, on the OTCBB trading day that immediately follows the date of
the Reverse Stock Split Effective Time, multiplied by (B) the amount of such
Fractional Share. From and after the Reverse Stock Split Effective
Time, each holder of a Fractional Share shall have no further interest as a
stockholder in the Corporation with respect to such Fractional
Share.
SECOND: The
amendment of the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation as set forth above
was approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote
thereon.
THIRD: Said
amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be
duly executed in its corporate name on _____________ ___, 20___.
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
W.
Barry Gilbert
|
Title:
|
Chairman
and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
PLEASE
MARK VOTES
AS
IN THIS EXAMPLE
|
REVOCABLE
PROXY
IEC ELECTRONICS
CORP.
|
With- For All
For hold Except
|
ANNUAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
WEDNESDAY,
FEBRUARY 4, 2009
|
|
1.
Election of six (6)
directors ¨
¨
¨ |
The
undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints W. Barry Gilbert
and Justin L.
Vigdor, and either one of them with full power of substitution, as
proxy or proxies to vote for the undersigned, in the name of the
undersigned, all of the Common Stock of IEC Electronics Corp. (the
"Company") of the undersigned, as if the undersigned were personally
present and voting at the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held at the office of the Company, 105 Norton Street, Newark, New York on
February 4, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. (the "Annual Meeting"), and at any and all
adjournments thereof, upon the following matters:
|
|
01
W. Barry Gilbert 02 Michael
G. Brudek
03
Eben S. Moulton 04 James C.
Rowe
05
Carl E.
Sassano 06
Jerold L. Zimmerman
INSTRUCTION:
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark
"For All Except" and write that nominee's
name in the
space
provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Proposal
to approve amendment to Company's Certificate of Incorporation to effect a
reverse stock split..
|
|
For
¨
|
Against
¨
|
Abstain
¨
|
|
|
3.
|
Transaction
of such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any
adjournment thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS
PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN
BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL
BE VOTED FOR ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS SPECIFIED IN THE PROXY
STATEMENT AND FOR THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION TO EFFECT A REVERSE STOCK
SPLIT. |
Detach
above card, sign, date and mail in postage paid envelope provided.
IEC
ELECTRONICS CORP.
IMPORTANT:
Sign the Proxy exactly as your name or names appear on your Common Stock
certificate; in the case of Common Stock held in joint tenancy, each joint
tenant must sign. Fiduciaries should indicate their full titles and the capacity
in which they sign. Please complete, sign, date and return this Proxy promptly
in the enclosed envelope.
PLEASE
ACT PROMPTLY
SIGN, DATE & MAIL YOUR PROXY CARD
TODAY
IF YOUR
ADDRESS HAS CHANGED, PLEASE CORRECT THE ADDRESS IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW AND
RETURN THIS PORTION WITH THE PROXY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________