UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-13508
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 63-0661573 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
100 Colonial Bank Blvd. Montgomery, Alabama |
36117 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(334) 676-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code.)
One Commerce Street, Suite 800, Montgomery, Alabama 36104
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
Common Stock, $2.50 par value per share | New York Stock Exchange |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to the Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $3,778,003,157, based on the closing price of $25.68 per share as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. (For purposes of calculating this amount, all directors, officers and principal shareholders of the registrant are treated as affiliates).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
Outstanding at February 16, 2007 | |
Common Stock, $2.50 par value per share | 152,810,173 shares |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document |
Parts Into Which Incorporated | |
Portions of Definitive Proxy Statement for 2007 Annual Meeting as specifically referred to herein. |
Part III |
PART I
Item 1. | Business |
General
The Registrant, The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (BancGroup, Colonial or the Company) is a Delaware corporation organized in 1974 as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the BHCA). BancGroup was originally organized as Southland Bancorporation, and its name was changed in 1981. In 1997, pursuant to the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, BancGroup consolidated its various banking subsidiaries into Colonial Bank. In 2000, pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act (Gramm-Leach), BancGroup elected to become a financial holding company which allows it to affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and to engage in other activities that are financial in nature, incidental to such financial activities, or complementary to such activities.
The principal activity of BancGroup is to supervise and coordinate the business of its subsidiaries and to provide them with capital and services. BancGroup derives substantially all of its income from dividends received from Colonial Bank. Various statutory provisions and regulatory policies limit the amount of dividends Colonial Bank may pay without regulatory approval. In addition, federal statutes restrict the ability of Colonial Bank to make loans to BancGroup.
At December 31, 2006, BancGroup and its subsidiaries employed 4,721 persons. BancGroups principal offices are located at 100 Colonial Bank Blvd., Montgomery, Alabama 36117 and its mailing address is: P.O. Box 241148, Montgomery, Alabama 36124. BancGroups telephone number at its principal office is (334) 676-5000.
Subsidiary Bank
Colonial Bank was converted into a national association on August 8, 2003. Its legal name was changed to Colonial Bank, N.A. but it still does business as, and is usually referred to herein as Colonial Bank. As of December 31, 2006, Colonial Bank had a total of 305 branches, with 166 branches in Florida, 92 branches in Alabama, 18 branches in Georgia, 14 branches in Texas and 15 branches in Nevada. Colonial Bank conducts a general commercial banking business in its respective service areas and offers a variety of demand, savings and time deposit products as well as extensions of credit through personal, commercial and mortgage loans within each of its market areas. Colonial Bank also provides additional services to its markets through cash management services, electronic banking services and credit card and merchant services. Through its wealth management area, Colonial Banks wholly owned subsidiaries Colonial Investment Services, Inc., Colonial Investment Services of Florida, Georgia, Nevada and Tennessee offer various insurance products and annuities for sale to the public. These subsidiaries are regulated by each states department of insurance.
Colonial Bank encounters intense competition in its commercial banking business, generally from other banks located in its respective metropolitan and service areas. Colonial Bank competes for interest bearing funds with other banks and with many non-bank issuers of commercial paper and other securities. Competition also exists with banks in other metropolitan areas of the United States, many of which are larger in terms of capital resources and personnel. In the conduct of certain aspects of its commercial banking business, Colonial Bank competes with savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage banks, factors, insurance companies and other financial institutions. At December 31, 2006, Colonial Bank accounted for approximately 99.7% of BancGroups consolidated assets.
Other Financial Services Operations
BancGroups subsidiary Colonial Brokerage, Inc., a Delaware corporation, provides full service and discount brokerage services and investment advice and is a member of and is regulated by the National Association of Securities Dealers.
1
Non-financial Services Operations
BancGroup has interests in several residential and commercial real estate developments located in the southeastern United States as well as two in the central Texas area. The aggregate investment in such entities is $37.9 million.
As of December 31, 2005, Colonial Bank had a 72.43% ownership in Goldleaf Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which provides internet and ACH services to community banks. On January 31, 2006, Colonial Bank sold its interest in Goldleaf Technologies, Inc.
Segment Information
The Company has six reportable segments for management reporting five regional bank segments located in Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Nevada and Texas, and the mortgage warehouse segment headquartered in Orlando, Florida. Each regional bank segment consists of commercial lending and full service branches in its geographic region. The branches provide a full range of traditional banking products as well as financial planning and mortgage banking services. The mortgage warehouse segment provides lines of credit collateralized by residential mortgage loans and other services to mortgage origination companies. Corporate functions not included in these reportable segments include treasury and parent activities, back office operations and intercompany eliminations. These functions are reported together as Corporate/Treasury/Other. For additional information related to segments, see Note 24, Segment Information, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Available Information
BancGroup makes available, free of charge through its Internet website (www.colonialbank.com), the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or furnishing such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Certain Regulatory Considerations
The following is a brief summary of the regulatory environment in which BancGroup and Colonial Bank operate and is not designed to be a complete discussion of all statutes and regulations affecting such operations, including those statutes and regulations specifically mentioned herein. Changes in the laws and regulations applicable to BancGroup and Colonial Bank can affect the operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. BancGroup cannot accurately predict whether legislation will ultimately be enacted, and if enacted, what the ultimate effect that legislation would have on BancGroup or its subsidiaries financial condition or results of operations. While banking regulations are material to the operations of BancGroup and Colonial Bank, it should be noted that supervision, regulation, and examination of BancGroup and Colonial Bank are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, not security holders.
BancGroup is a registered bank holding company and a financial holding company subject to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve). As such, it is subject to the BHCA and many of the Federal Reserves regulations promulgated thereunder. The Federal Reserve has broad enforcement powers over bank holding companies, including the power to impose substantial fines and civil money penalties.
Colonial Bank, a national banking association, is subject to supervision and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). Colonial Bank converted from an Alabama state-chartered Federal Reserve member bank to a national banking association on August 8, 2003. The deposits of Colonial Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to the extent provided by law. The FDIC assesses deposit insurance premiums the amount of which may, in the future, depend in part on the condition of Colonial Bank.
2
Moreover, the FDIC may terminate deposit insurance of Colonial Bank under certain circumstances. The bank regulatory agencies have broad enforcement powers over depository institutions under their jurisdiction, including the power to terminate deposit insurance, to impose fines and other civil and criminal penalties, and to appoint a conservator or receiver if any of a number of conditions are met.
Mergers, Acquisitions and Changes in Control
One limitation under the BHCA and the Federal Reserves regulations requires that BancGroup obtain prior approval of the Federal Reserve before BancGroup acquires, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of any class of voting securities of another bank. Prior approval also must be obtained before BancGroup acquires all or substantially all of the assets of another bank, or before it merges or consolidates with another bank holding company. Because BancGroup is a registered bank holding company, persons seeking to acquire 25% or more of any class of its voting securities must receive the prior approval of the Federal Reserve. Similarly, under certain circumstances, persons seeking to acquire between 5% and 25% also may be required to obtain prior Federal Reserve approval.
In September 1994, Congress enacted the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. This legislation, among other things, amended the BHCA to permit bank holding companies, subject to certain limitations, to acquire either control or substantial assets of a bank located in states other than that bank holding companys home state regardless of state law prohibitions. This legislation became effective on September 29, 1995. In addition, this legislation also amended the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to permit, beginning on June 1, 1997 (or earlier where state legislatures provided express authorization), the merger of insured banks with banks in other states, subject to certain limitations.
FDIC Improvement Act
As a result of enactment in 1991 of the FDIC Improvement Act (FDICIA), banks are subject to increased reporting requirements and more frequent examinations by the bank regulatory agencies. The agencies also have the authority to dictate certain key decisions that formerly were left to management, including compensation standards, loan underwriting standards, asset growth, and payment of dividends. Failure to comply with these standards, or failure to maintain capital above specified levels set by the regulators, could lead to the imposition of penalties or the forced resignation of management. If a bank becomes critically undercapitalized, the banking agencies have the authority to place an institution into receivership.
Consumer Protection Laws
There are a number of laws that govern the relationship between Colonial Bank and its customers. For example, the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) is designed to encourage lending by banks to persons in low and moderate income areas. The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act attempt to minimize lending decisions based on impermissible criteria, such as race or gender. The Truth-in-Lending Act and the Truth-in-Savings Act require banks to provide certain disclosure of relevant terms related to loans and savings accounts, respectively. Anti-tying restrictions (which prohibit, for instance, conditioning the availability or terms of credit on the purchase of another banking product) further restrict Colonial Banks relationships with its customers.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act
In 1999, Gramm-Leach was signed into law and it became effective on March 11, 2000. The primary purpose of Gramm-Leach was to eliminate barriers between investment banking and commercial banking and to permit, within certain limitations, the affiliation of financial service providers. Generally, Gramm-Leach (i) repealed the historical restrictions against, and eliminated many federal and state law barriers to affiliations among banks, securities firms, insurance companies and other financial service providers, (ii) provided a uniform
3
framework for the activities of banks, savings institutions and their holding companies, (iii) broadened the activities that may be conducted by and through national banks and other banking subsidiaries of bank holding companies, (iv) provided an enhanced framework for protecting the privacy of consumers information, (v) adopted a number of provisions related to the capitalization, membership, corporate governance and other measures designed to modernize the Federal Home Loan Bank System, (vi) modified the laws governing the implementation of the CRA, and (vii) addressed a variety of other legal and regulatory issues affecting both day-to-day operations and long-term activities of financial institutions.
More specifically, under Gramm-Leach, bank holding companies, such as BancGroup, that meet certain management, capital, and CRA standards, are permitted to become financial holding companies and, by doing so, to affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and to engage in other activities that are financial in nature, incidental to such financial activities, or complementary to such activities. A bank holding company may become a financial holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized under the FDICIA prompt corrective action provisions, is well managed and has at least a satisfactory rating under the CRA. The required filing is a declaration that the bank holding company wishes to become a financial holding company and meets all applicable requirements. BancGroup became a financial holding company on May 12, 2000.
Generally, no prior regulatory approval will be required for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings association, engaged in activities permitted under Gramm-Leach. Activities cited by Gramm-Leach as being financial in nature include:
| securities underwriting, dealing and market making; |
| sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies; |
| insurance underwriting and agency; |
| merchant banking activities; and |
| activities that the Federal Reserve has determined to be closely related to banking. |
Privacy Laws
In 2000, the federal banking regulators issued final regulations implementing certain provisions of Gramm-Leach governing the privacy of consumer financial information. The regulations limit the disclosure by financial institutions, such as BancGroup, Colonial Bank and certain of their subsidiaries, of nonpublic personal information about individuals who obtain financial products or services for personal, family, or household purposes. Subject to certain exceptions allowed by law, the regulations cover information sharing between financial institutions and nonaffiliated third parties. More specifically, the regulations require financial institutions to (i) provide initial notices to customers about their privacy policies, describing the conditions under which they may disclose nonpublic personal financial information to nonaffiliated third parties and affiliates; (ii) provide annual notices of their privacy policies to their current customers; and (iii) provide a reasonable method for consumers to opt out of disclosures to nonaffiliated third parties.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) governs the ability of a financial institution to share consumer financial information with its affiliates. The FCRA requires financial institutions to provide their customers with notice and an opportunity to opt-out before sharing certain information with its affiliates. In December 2003, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACTA) was enacted. FACTA included a provision further limiting a financial institutions ability to share customer information with its affiliates for marketing purposes by requiring financial institutions to provide their customers with the ability to opt-out of such sharing of customer information. Regulations implementing this provision of FACTA have been proposed but not finalized.
4
Protection of Customer Information
In February 2001, the federal banking regulators issued final regulations implementing the provisions of Gramm-Leach relating to the protection of customer information. The regulations, applicable to national banking associations, like Colonial Bank, and certain of their nonbank subsidiaries, and to bank holding companies, like BancGroup, and certain of their nonbank subsidiaries, relate to administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for customer records and information. These safeguards are intended to: (i) ensure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information; (ii) protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records; (iii) protect against unauthorized access to or use of such records or information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer; and (iv) ensure the proper disposal of such information.
In March 2005, the federal banking agencies jointly issued Interagency Guidance on Response Programs for Unauthorized Access to Customer Information and Customer Notice. The guidance requires all financial institutions to implement a response program to address security breaches involving customer information. The guidance requires a financial institutions response to include, among other things, procedures for notifying customers about incidents of unauthorized access when certain criteria are met.
Bank Secrecy Act
The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) is a tool the U.S. government uses to fight drug trafficking, money laundering and other crimes. Under the BSA, financial institutions are required to file certain reports, including suspicious activities reports, with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network under certain circumstances. Financial institutions are also required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the BSA. If a financial institution fails to timely file a report or fails to implement its BSA policies and procedures, it could subject the institution to enforcement action or civil money penalties.
On October 26, 2001, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act) was signed into law. The USA PATRIOT Act amended the BSA and broadened the application of anti-money laundering regulations to apply to additional types of financial institutions, such as broker-dealers, and strengthened the ability of the U.S. government to detect and prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The principal provisions of Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act require that regulated financial institutions, including national banks: (i) establish an anti-money laundering program that includes training and audit components; (ii) comply with regulations regarding the verification of the identity of any person seeking to open an account; (iii) take additional required precautions with non-U.S. owned accounts; and (iv) perform certain verification and certification of money laundering risk for their foreign correspondent banking relationships. The USA PATRIOT Act also expanded the conditions under which funds in a U.S. interbank account may be subject to forfeiture and increased the penalties for violation of anti-money laundering regulations. Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA PATRIOT Acts requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. BancGroup has adopted policies, procedures and controls to address compliance with the requirements of the USA PATRIOT Act under the existing regulations and will continue to revise and update its policies, procedures and controls to reflect changes required by the USA PATRIOT Act and implementing regulations.
Safety and Soundness Standards
Pursuant to FDICIA, the federal banking regulatory agencies have adopted a set of guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards for depository institutions such as Colonial Bank. The guidelines establish general standards relating to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit
5
excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder. In addition, the agencies adopted regulations that authorize an agency to order an institution that has been given notice by an agency that it is not satisfying any of such safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If the institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan or fails to implement an accepted plan, the agency must issue an order directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions be taken, including restricting asset growth, restricting interest rates paid on deposits, and requiring an increase in the institutions ratio of tangible equity to assets.
Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions
BancGroup is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries, including Colonial Bank. There are various legal and regulatory limitations on the extent to which BancGroups subsidiaries can, among other things, finance, or otherwise supply funds to, BancGroup. Specifically, dividends from Colonial Bank are the principal source of BancGroups cash funds and there are certain legal restrictions under the National Bank Act and OCC regulations on the payment of dividends by national banks. The relevant regulatory agencies also have authority to prohibit BancGroup and Colonial Bank from engaging in what, in the opinion of such regulatory body, constitutes an unsafe or unsound banking practice. The payment of dividends could, depending upon the financial condition of BancGroup and Colonial Bank, be deemed to constitute such an unsafe or unsound practice.
In addition, Colonial Bank and its subsidiaries are subject to limitations under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act with respect to extensions of credit to, investments in, and certain other transactions with, BancGroup and its other subsidiaries. Furthermore, loans and extensions of credit are also subject to various collateral requirements. On October 31, 2002, the Federal Reserve adopted Regulation W, which combines the Federal Reserves interpretations and exemptions relating to Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. Regulation W became effective on April 1, 2003 and is applicable to national banks.
Capital Adequacy
The Federal Reserve has adopted minimum risk-based and leverage capital guidelines for bank holding companies. The minimum required ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet items, such as standby letters of credit) is 8%, of which 4% must consist of Tier 1 capital. As of December 31, 2006, BancGroups total risk-based capital ratio was 11.77%, including 9.09% of Tier 1 capital. The minimum required leverage capital ratio is 3% for bank holding companies that meet certain specified criteria, including that they have the highest regulatory rating. A minimum leverage ratio of 4% is required for bank holding companies not meeting these criteria. As of December 31, 2006, BancGroups leverage capital ratio was 7.81%. Generally, bank holding companies are expected to operate well above the minimum capital ratios. Higher capital ratios may be required for any bank holding company if warranted by its particular circumstances or risk profile. Failure to meet capital guidelines can subject a bank holding company to a variety of enforcement remedies, including restrictions on its operations and activities. The OCC has adopted substantially similar capital requirements for national banks.
Regarding depository institutions, the prompt corrective action provisions of the federal banking statutes establish five capital categories (well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized), and impose significant restrictions on the operations of an institution that is not at least adequately capitalized. Under certain circumstances, an institution may be downgraded to a category lower than that warranted by its capital levels, and subjected to the supervisory restrictions applicable to institutions in the lower capital category. As of December 31, 2006, Colonial Bank was well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
An undercapitalized depository institution is subject to restrictions in a number of areas, including capital distributions, payments of management fees and expansion. In addition, an undercapitalized depository
6
institution is required to submit a capital restoration plan. A depository institutions holding company must guarantee the capital plan up to an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the depository institutions assets at the time it becomes undercapitalized or the amount needed to restore the capital of the institution to the levels required for the institution to be classified as adequately capitalized at the time the institution fails to comply with the plan. A depository institution is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized if it fails in any material respect to implement a capital restoration plan.
Significantly undercapitalized depository institutions may be subject to a number of additional significant requirements and restrictions, including requirements to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, to improve management, to restrict asset growth, to prohibit acceptance of correspondent bank deposits, to restrict senior executive compensation and to limit transactions with affiliates. Critically undercapitalized depository institutions are further subject to restrictions on paying principal or interest on subordinated debt, making investments, expanding, acquiring or selling assets, extending credit for highly-leveraged transactions, paying excessive compensation, amending their charters or bylaws and making any material changes in accounting methods. In general, a receiver or conservator must be appointed for a depository institution within 90 days after the institution is deemed to be critically undercapitalized.
Support of Subsidiary Bank
Under Federal Reserve policy, BancGroup is expected to act as a source of financial strength to, and to commit resources to support, Colonial Bank. This support may be required at times when, absent such Federal Reserve policy, BancGroup might not otherwise be inclined to provide it. In the event of a bank holding companys bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.
FDIC Insurance Assessments
The FDIC is an independent federal agency established originally to insure the deposits, up to prescribed statutory limits, of federally insured banks and to preserve the safety and soundness of the banking industry. The FDIC has adopted a risk-based assessment system for insured depository institutions that takes into account the risks attributable to different categories and concentrations of assets and liabilities.
Colonial Banks deposit accounts are insured by the FDIC to the maximum extent permitted by law. Colonial Bank pays deposit insurance premiums to the FDIC based on a risk-based assessment system established by the FDIC for all insured institutions. Institutions considered well-capitalized and financially sound pay the lowest premiums, while those institutions that are less than adequately capitalized and of substantial supervisory concern pay the highest premiums. During 2006, assessment rates for insured institutions ranged from 0 cents per $100 of assessable deposits for well-capitalized institutions with minor supervisory concerns to 27 cents per $100 of assessable deposits for undercapitalized institutions with substantial supervisory concerns.
Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005. In February 2006, the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 and the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Conforming Amendments Act of 2005 (collectively, the Reform Act) were signed into law. The Reform Act revised the laws concerning federal deposit insurance by making the following changes: (i) merging the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund into a new fund, the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), effective March 31, 2006; (ii) increasing the deposit insurance coverage for certain retirement accounts to $250,000 effective April 1, 2006; (iii) beginning in 2010, deposit insurance coverage on individual accounts may be indexed for inflation; (iv) the FDIC will have more discretion in managing deposit insurance assessments; and (v) eligible institutions will receive a one-time initial assessment credit.
The Reform Act authorized the FDIC to revise the risk-based assessment system. Accordingly, insurance premiums will be based on a number of factors, including the risk of loss that insured institutions pose to the
7
DIF. The Reform Act replaced the minimum reserve ratio of 1.25% with a range of between 1.15% and 1.5% for the DIF, depending on projected losses, economic changes, and assessment rates at the end of each calendar year. In addition, the FDIC is no longer prohibited from charging banks in the lowest risk category when the reserve ratio premium is greater than 1.25%.
In November 2006, the FDIC adopted a new rule concerning its risk-based assessment system. Under the new system, the FDIC will evaluate an institutions risk based on supervisory ratings for all insured institutions, financial ratios for most institutions, and long-term debt issuer ratings for certain large institutions. In 2007, assessment rates will range between 5 and 43 cents per $100 of assessable deposits. Certain credits will be allowed against 2007 premiums for certain eligible institutions with premium assessments prior to 1996. Management expects the Companys premium cost, excluding applicable credits, to be between .05% and .07% for 2007.
In addition to deposit insurance assessments, the FDIC is authorized to collect assessments against insured deposits to be paid to the Finance Corporation (FICO) to service FICO debt incurred in the 1980s. The FICO assessment rate is adjusted quarterly. The average annual assessment rate in 2006 was 1.28 cents per $100 for insured deposits. For the first quarter of 2007, the FICO assessment rate for such deposits will be 1.22 cents per $100 of assessable deposits.
Colonial Banks total FDIC assessment expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 equaled $2.0 million.
OCC Assessment
The OCC imposes a semiannual assessment on all national banks under its supervision. The amount of the assessment is based on the Colonial Banks total assets. The assessment for the first half of the year is based on the prior years total assets as of December 31, and the assessment for the second half of the year is based on the total assets as of June 30. Colonial Banks assessment expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $2.8 million.
Other Subsidiary Regulation
Certain subsidiaries of BancGroup and Colonial Bank are regulated by other governmental agencies. Where material, such regulation is disclosed with the disclosure of the subsidiary.
Additional Information
Additional information, including statistical information concerning the business of BancGroup, is set forth herein. See Selected Financial Data and Selected Quarterly Financial Data 2006-2005 and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Executive Officers and Directors
Pursuant to general instruction G, information regarding executive officers of BancGroup is contained herein at Item 10.
8
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
Industry Factors
As a financial services company, our earnings are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions.
Our business and earnings are impacted by general business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, money supply, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, the strength of the U.S. economy and the local economies in which we operate. For example, an economic downturn, increase in unemployment, or other events that negatively impact household and/or corporate incomes could decrease the demand for the Companys loan and non-loan products and services and increase the number of customers who fail to pay interest or principal on their loans.
Our earnings are significantly affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Its policies determine in large part our cost of funds for lending and investing and the return we earn on those loans and investments, both of which impact our net interest margin, and can materially affect the value of financial instruments we hold, such as debt securities. Its policies also can affect our borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their loans. Changes in Federal Reserve Board policies are beyond our control and difficult to predict or anticipate.
The financial services industry is highly competitive.
We operate in a highly competitive industry which could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. Banks, securities firms and insurance companies can now merge by creating a financial services company called a financial holding company, which can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (both agency and underwriting) and merchant banking. A number of foreign banks have acquired financial services companies in the United States, further increasing competition in the U.S. market. Also, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for nonbanks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. Many of our competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and some have lower cost structures.
We are heavily regulated by federal agencies.
The Company, its subsidiary bank and certain nonbank subsidiaries are heavily regulated by federal agencies. This regulation is to protect depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not security holders. Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways including limiting the types of financial services and products we may offer and/or increasing the ability of nonbanks to offer competing financial services and products. Also, our failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies and damage to our reputation. For more information, refer to discussions of regulatory considerations contained in Item 1 Business and Note 16, Regulatory Matters and Restrictions.
Company Factors
Maintaining or increasing our market share depends on market acceptance and regulatory approval of new products and services.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to adapt our products and services to evolving industry standards. There is increasing pressure on financial services companies to provide products and services at lower
9
prices. This can reduce our net interest margin and revenues from our fee-based products and services. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including internet-based services, could require us to make substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services. We might not successfully introduce new products and services, achieve market acceptance of our products and services, and/or develop and maintain loyal customers.
The holding company relies on dividends from its subsidiaries for most of its revenue.
The holding company is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. It receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on the holding companys common stock and interest and principal on its debt. Various federal and/or state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that our bank and certain of our nonbank subsidiaries may pay to the holding company. Also, the holding companys right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiarys liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiarys creditors. For more information, refer to Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions in Item 1 and Note 16, Regulatory Matters and Restrictions.
Our accounting policies and methods determine how we report our financial condition and results of operations, and they may require management to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. Our management must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods so that not only do they comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States but also that they reflect managements judgment as to the most appropriate manner in which to record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which might be reasonable under the circumstances yet might result in our reporting materially different amounts than would have been reported under a different alternative. Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes our significant accounting policies.
We have identified five accounting policies as being critical to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations because they require management to make particularly subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These critical accounting policies relate to: (1) allowance for loan losses, (2) purchase accounting and goodwill, (3) income taxes, (4) consolidations and (5) stock-based compensation. For more information, refer in this report to Critical Accounting Policies in Managements Discussion and Analysis.
We have an active acquisition program.
We regularly explore opportunities to acquire financial institutions and other financial services providers. We cannot predict the number, size or timing of future acquisitions. We typically do not comment publicly on a possible acquisition or business combination until we have signed a definitive agreement for the transaction.
Our ability to successfully complete an acquisition generally is subject to regulatory approval, and we cannot be certain when or if, or on what terms and conditions, any required regulatory approvals will be granted. We might be required to divest banks or branches as a condition to receiving regulatory approval.
Difficulty in integrating an acquired company may cause us not to realize expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other projected benefits from the acquisition. Specifically, the integration process could result in higher than expected deposit attrition (run-off), loss of key employees, the disruption of our business or the business of the acquired company, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Also, the negative impact of any divestitures required by regulatory authorities in connection with acquisitions or business combinations may be greater than expected.
10
Our mix of products and customers subject us to potential concentration risk.
Colonial Bank offers a defined group of products, both retail and commercial, to its customers throughout the branch network. As a result of the products offered and customers served, BancGroup is subject to concentration risk. See Concentration discussion within the Risk Management section of Managements Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
Our stock price can be volatile.
Our stock price can fluctuate widely in response to a variety of factors including:
| actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results; |
| recommendations by securities analysts; |
| new technology used, or services offered, by our competitors; |
| significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by or involving us or our competitors; |
| failure to integrate our acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from our acquisitions; |
| operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us; |
| news reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry; |
| changes in government regulations; and |
| geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts. |
General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, also could cause our stock price to decrease regardless of our operating results.
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
Item 2. | Properties |
BancGroup leases its executive offices in Montgomery, Alabama, operations centers in Birmingham, Alabama and Orlando, Florida and maintains regional executive offices in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, and Texas.
As of December 31, 2006, Colonial Bank owned 205 and leased 100 of its full-service branches. See Notes 1 and 10 to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings |
In the opinion of BancGroup, based on review and consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of any litigation presently pending is not anticipated to have a material adverse effect on BancGroups consolidated financial statements or results of operations.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None.
11
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
BancGroups Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CNB. As of February 16, 2007, BancGroup had outstanding 152,810,173 shares of Common Stock, with 9,253 registered shareholders.
The following table indicates the high and low closing prices for and dividends paid on Common Stock during 2006 and 2005.
Sale Price of Common Stock |
Dividends Declared On Common Stock (per share) | ||||||||
High | Low | ||||||||
2006 |
|||||||||
1st Quarter |
$ | 25.26 | $ | 23.69 | $ | 0.17 | |||
2nd Quarter |
26.97 | 24.59 | 0.17 | ||||||
3rd Quarter |
26.01 | 23.96 | 0.17 | ||||||
4th Quarter |
25.97 | 23.53 | 0.17 | ||||||
2005 |
|||||||||
1st Quarter |
$ | 21.47 | $ | 19.76 | $ | 0.1525 | |||
2nd Quarter |
23.20 | 20.15 | 0.1525 | ||||||
3rd Quarter |
23.65 | 22.23 | 0.1525 | ||||||
4th Quarter |
25.74 | 21.58 | 0.1525 |
BancGroup has historically paid dividends each quarter, however, future dividends are subject to approval by BancGroups Board of Directors. The restrictions imposed upon Colonial Bank in regard to its ability to pay dividends to BancGroup, which in turn limit BancGroups ability to pay dividends, are described herein. See Payments of Dividends and Other Restrictions in Item 1.
The information required by this item concerning Equity Compensation Plans is included in Note 18, Stock Plans, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1) | ||||||
3rd Quarter total |
1,591,700 | $ | 25.18 | 1,591,700 | $ | 109,915,933 | ||||
October 1 31, 2006 |
319,000 | $ | 24.09 | 319,000 | $ | 102,229,732 | ||||
November 1 30, 2006 |
94,200 | $ | 23.67 | 94,200 | $ | 100,000,400 | ||||
December 1 31, 2006 |
41,500 | $ | 24.02 | 41,500 | $ | 99,003,564 | ||||
4th Quarter total |
454,700 | $ | 24.00 | 454,700 | $ | 99,003,564 | ||||
2006 Total |
2,046,400 | $ | 24.89 | 2,046,400 | $ | 99,003,564 | ||||
(1) | Information is as of the end of the period. |
On July 21, 2006, the Company publicly announced a share repurchase program to purchase the number of shares of BancGroup Common Stock issued under BancGroups various equity-based compensation and incentive plans during 2006, and the number of shares which are likely to be issued under the Plans through the termination date of the authorization, not to exceed $50,000,000. This program will terminate on the earlier of its completion or July 19, 2008. On September 11, 2006, the Company publicly announced another share repurchase program to purchase shares of BancGroup Common Stock not to exceed $100,000,000. This program will terminate on the earlier of its completion or September 8, 2008. All BancGroup shares purchased during the period were purchased in open-market transactions.
12
Shareholder Performance Graph
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the five-year cumulative return of BancGroup common stock, based on an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2001 and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with that of the Standard & Poors 500 Index (the S&P 500) and the S&P 500 Bank Index. The comparisons in this graph are set forth in response to the Securities and Exchange Commissions (the SEC) disclosure requirements, and therefore are not intended to forecast or be indicative of future performance of the common stock.
13
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the last five years:
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Statement of Income: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 1,455,585 | $ | 1,162,055 | $ | 848,017 | $ | 780,808 | $ | 783,431 | ||||||
Interest expense |
700,318 | 452,833 | 280,769 | 285,660 | 328,222 | |||||||||||
Net interest income |
755,267 | 709,222 | 567,248 | 495,148 | 455,209 | |||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
22,142 | 26,838 | 26,994 | 37,378 | 35,980 | |||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
733,125 | 682,384 | 540,254 | 457,770 | 419,229 | |||||||||||
Noninterest income |
189,222 | 175,976 | 153,201 | 138,627 | 131,769 | |||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
519,601 | 515,255 | 431,649 | 376,001 | 318,287 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
402,746 | 343,105 | 261,806 | 220,396 | 232,711 | |||||||||||
Applicable income taxes |
136,933 | 114,603 | 88,929 | 74,785 | 80,377 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
265,813 | 228,502 | 172,877 | 145,611 | 152,334 | |||||||||||
Discontinued Operations:(1) |
||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes of ($445) for the year ended December 31, 2002 |
| | | | (846 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 265,813 | $ | 228,502 | $ | 172,877 | $ | 145,611 | $ | 151,488 | ||||||
Earnings Per Common Share: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.73 | $ | 1.53 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.27 | ||||||
Diluted |
1.72 | 1.52 | 1.31 | 1.16 | 1.26 | |||||||||||
Net income: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.73 | $ | 1.53 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.27 | ||||||
Diluted |
1.72 | 1.52 | 1.31 | 1.16 | 1.26 | |||||||||||
Average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
153,598 | 149,053 | 131,144 | 124,615 | 119,583 | |||||||||||
Diluted |
154,810 | 150,790 | 132,315 | 125,289 | 120,648 | |||||||||||
Cash dividends per common share |
$ | 0.68 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.52 |
(1) | During 2000, the Company exited the mortgage servicing business. The financial results for this line of business have been separately reported as Discontinued Operations for all periods presented. |
14
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Statement of Condition data at year end: |
|||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 22,784,249 | $ | 21,426,197 | $ | 18,896,610 | $ | 16,267,979 | $ | 15,814,857 | |||||
Total loans, net of unearned income: |
|||||||||||||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
281,693 | 483,701 | 1,114,923 | 982,488 | 1,671,149 | ||||||||||
Loans, excluding mortgage warehouse loans |
15,197,196 | 14,416,163 | 11,742,888 | 10,606,407 | 10,021,281 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
1,474,000 | 1,097,892 | 678,496 | 378,324 | 347,101 | ||||||||||
Non-time deposits |
9,092,663 | 9,012,943 | 7,546,038 | 6,017,435 | 5,041,262 | ||||||||||
Total deposits |
16,091,054 | 15,483,449 | 11,863,695 | 9,918,434 | 9,410,554 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt |
2,522,273 | 2,338,831 | 2,260,957 | 2,442,235 | 2,114,624 | ||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
2,057,335 | 1,932,691 | 1,398,291 | 1,185,452 | 1,082,899 | ||||||||||
Average balances: |
|||||||||||||||
Total assets |
22,237,690 | 20,682,310 | 17,433,571 | 15,842,491 | 13,812,032 | ||||||||||
Interest-earning assets |
20,409,906 | 18,943,511 | 16,173,539 | 14,736,974 | 12,909,926 | ||||||||||
Total loans, net of unearned income: |
|||||||||||||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
348,024 | 728,057 | 1,033,238 | 1,457,716 | 1,093,061 | ||||||||||
Loans, excluding mortgage warehouse loans |
14,991,675 | 13,411,323 | 11,115,275 | 10,093,214 | 9,427,710 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
1,374,115 | 823,177 | 497,315 | 373,226 | 89,566 | ||||||||||
Non-time deposits |
9,080,151 | 8,543,542 | 6,847,334 | 5,419,445 | 4,426,020 | ||||||||||
Total deposits |
15,788,319 | 13,987,525 | 10,862,040 | 9,418,926 | 8,734,296 | ||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
1,992,772 | 1,779,081 | 1,285,772 | 1,125,296 | 975,352 |
15
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Selected Financial Measures: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income to: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Average assets |
1.20 | % | 1.10 | % | 0.99 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.10 | % | ||||||||||
Average shareholders equity |
13.34 | 12.84 | 13.45 | 12.94 | 15.53 | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest income/average assets |
0.85 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.95 | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense/average assets |
2.34 | 2.49 | 2.48 | 2.37 | 2.30 | |||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio |
54.94 | 58.11 | 59.76 | 59.11 | 53.96 | |||||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio |
39.53 | 40.13 | 44.27 | 48.28 | 41.27 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity to assets |
9.03 | 9.02 | 7.40 | 7.29 | 6.85 | |||||||||||||||
Tangible capital ratio |
6.26 | 5.97 | 5.43 | 5.65 | 5.31 | |||||||||||||||
Book value per share |
$ | 13.46 | $ | 12.53 | $ | 10.45 | $ | 9.34 | $ | 8.75 | ||||||||||
Tangible book value per share |
$ | 9.05 | $ | 8.02 | $ | 7.50 | $ | 7.11 | $ | 6.68 | ||||||||||
Risk-based capital:(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 |
9.09 | % | 9.15 | % | 8.80 | % | 9.41 | % | 7.85 | % | ||||||||||
Total |
11.77 | 12.17 | 11.39 | 12.55 | 11.01 | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 leverage(1) |
7.81 | 7.77 | 7.16 | 7.54 | 6.98 | |||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets to net loans, other real estate and repossessions(2) |
0.16 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.65 | 0.78 | |||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans |
0.12 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.29 | |||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans (net of unearned income) |
1.13 | 1.15 | 1.16 | 1.20 | 1.16 | |||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans(2) |
1247 | 662 | 548 | 240 | 191 | |||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Measures:(3) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income/average assets(4)(7) |
0.82 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.78 | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense/average assets(5) |
2.34 | 2.45 | 2.43 | 2.37 | 2.30 | |||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio(6) |
55.39 | 57.06 | 59.32 | 58.92 | 56.30 |
(1) | Refer to Note 16, Regulatory Matters and Restrictions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
(2) | Nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets are shown as defined in the Risk Management section of Managements Discussion and Analysis. |
(3) | Management believes that these non-GAAP measures provide information that is useful to investors in understanding the performance of the Companys underlying operations and performance trends. Specifically, these measures permit evaluation and comparison of results for ongoing business operations, and it is on this basis that Management internally assesses the Companys performance. |
(4) | Excluded from noninterest income are securities and derivatives gains (losses), net of $4.8 million, ($24.7) million, $7.5 million, $4.8 million and $5.7 million for 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively; gain on sale of Goldleaf of $2.8 million for 2006; gain on sale of branches of $37.0 million for 2005; and changes in fair value of swap derivatives of ($12.1) million, ($0.4) million, ($6.9) million and $18.9 million for 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. |
(5) | Excluded from noninterest expense are net losses related to the early extinguishment of debt of $9.6 million and $7.4 million for the years ended 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
(6) | Noninterest income excludes gains (losses) on the sale of securities, derivatives, branches and Goldleaf as detailed in note (4) above. Noninterest expense excludes net losses related to the early extinguishment of debt as detailed in note (5) above. |
(7) | Prior periods have been conformed to the current period presentation. |
16
Selected Quarterly Financial Data 2006-2005
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31 | Sept. 30 | June 30 | March 31 | Dec. 31 | Sept. 30 | June 30 | March 31 | |||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 380,154 | $ | 381,307 | $ | 359,449 | $ | 334,675 | $ | 320,941 | $ | 308,138 | $ | 279,112 | $ | 253,864 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
195,686 | 190,755 | 167,362 | 146,515 | 134,378 | 122,872 | 104,677 | 90,906 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
184,468 | 190,552 | 192,087 | 188,160 | 186,563 | 185,266 | 174,435 | 162,958 | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,400 | 1,450 | 4,950 | 12,342 | 5,892 | 6,007 | 9,010 | 5,929 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan loss |
181,068 | 189,102 | 187,137 | 175,818 | 180,671 | 179,259 | 165,425 | 157,029 | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
49,829 | 45,962 | 44,873 | 48,558 | 44,302 | 39,326 | 60,597 | 31,751 | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
130,529 | 131,985 | 131,226 | 125,861 | 132,481 | 133,964 | 131,982 | 116,828 | ||||||||||||||||
Applicable income taxes |
34,125 | 35,047 | 34,266 | 33,495 | 30,985 | 28,145 | 31,709 | 23,764 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 66,243 | $ | 68,032 | $ | 66,518 | $ | 65,020 | $ | 61,507 | $ | 56,476 | $ | 62,331 | $ | 48,188 | ||||||||
Earnings Per Share: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.43 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.35 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.43 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.34 |
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This annual report to shareholders and the Annual Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Words such as believes, estimates, plans, expects, should, may, might, outlook, and anticipates, and similar expressions as they relate to BancGroup (including its subsidiaries or its management), are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in these reports are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the statements.
In addition to factors mentioned elsewhere in this annual report or previously disclosed in BancGroups SEC reports (accessible on the SECs website at www.sec.gov or on BancGroups website at www.colonialbank.com), the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements, and future results could differ materially from historical performance. These factors are not exclusive:
| deposit attrition, customer loss, or revenue loss in the ordinary course of business; |
| increases in competitive pressure in the banking industry; |
| costs or difficulties related to the integration of the businesses of BancGroup and institutions it acquires are greater than expected; |
| the inability of BancGroup to realize elements of its strategic plans for 2007 and beyond; |
| changes in the interest rate environment which expand or reduce margins or adversely affect critical estimates as applied and projected returns on investments; |
| economic conditions affecting real estate values and transactions in BancGroups market and/or general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally, that are less favorable then expected; |
| natural disasters in BancGroups primary market areas result in prolonged business disruption or materially impair the value of collateral securing loans; |
| managements assumptions and estimates underlying critical accounting policies prove to be inadequate or materially incorrect or are not borne out by subsequent events; |
17
| the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes; |
| current or future litigation, regulatory investigations, proceedings or inquiries; |
| strategies to manage interest rate risk may yield results other than those anticipated; |
| changes which may occur in the regulatory environment; |
| a significant rate of inflation (deflation); |
| acts of terrorism or war; and |
| changes in the securities markets. |
Many of these factors are beyond BancGroups control. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward looking statements made by or on behalf of BancGroup. Any such statement speaks only as of the date the statement was made or as of such date that may be referenced within the statement. BancGroup does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is presented on the following pages. The principal purpose of this review is to provide the reader of the attached financial statements and accompanying notes with a detailed analysis of the financial results of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and subsidiaries.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. is a $22.8 billion financial services company providing diversified services including retail and commercial banking, wealth management services, mortgage banking and insurance through its branch network, private banking offices or officers, ATMs and the internet as well as other distribution channels to consumers and businesses. At December 31, 2006, BancGroup had 305 branches in Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Nevada, and Texas.
BancGroup is primarily a Florida bank with more of its assets, deposits and branches in Florida than in any other state. The following chart includes the Companys assets, deposits and branches by state as of December 31, 2006.
Assets | Deposits | Branches | |||||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Number | % | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||
Florida |
$ | 12,804 | 56 | % | $ | 9,422 | 59 | % | 166 | 54 | % | ||||||
Alabama |
3,980 | 18 | % | 3,869 | 24 | % | 92 | 30 | % | ||||||||
Georgia |
1,418 | 6 | % | 815 | 5 | % | 18 | 6 | % | ||||||||
Texas |
1,405 | 6 | % | 722 | 4 | % | 14 | 5 | % | ||||||||
Nevada |
966 | 4 | % | 750 | 5 | % | 15 | 5 | % | ||||||||
Corporate/Other |
2,211 | 10 | % | 513 | 3 | % | | | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 22,784 | 100 | % | $ | 16,091 | 100 | % | 305 | 100 | % | ||||||
Strategy
BancGroup is built upon the foundation of a community banking philosophy that emphasizes local responsibility for customer relationships. This operating philosophy has been important in attracting and retaining skilled and highly motivated local management teams and developing a strong customer base, particularly with respect to lending relationships.
18
The expertise in each local market is supported by centralized operations, which allow the local banking officers to concentrate on serving their customers. Through this structure of local customer relationship responsibility and centralized operations, the local banking officers have decision making capability while at the same time having an effective operational support structure at their disposal to service their customers in a more cost effective and efficient manner.
BancGroups growth strategy concentrates on developing high growth markets in Florida, Nevada, Georgia and Texas while maintaining a strong presence in growing markets within Alabama. The Company plans to grow primarily through internal strategies of seeking quality loan growth, generating deposit growth through the development of customer relationships and competitive product offerings, increasing noninterest income through continued expansion of fee based products and services and cultivating a sales oriented business culture with an emphasis on customer service. BancGroup will also continue to monitor possible acquisitions of strong banks operating in high growth markets that fit into our strategic plans and desired market areas.
Earnings Overview
Colonial had record earnings for the year ended December 31, 2006 of $1.72 per diluted share, a 13% increase over the $1.52 earned in 2005. Net income for the year was a record $266 million, a 16% increase over 2005.
Colonials net interest income increased 6% over 2005, driven by a strong increase in average loans, excluding mortgage warehouse, of 12%. This increase was offset partially by a $386 million, or 11%, reduction in average investment securities. The net interest margin for 2006 was 3.71% compared to 3.75% for 2005. Net interest margin compression was caused primarily by increased funding costs arising from increased deposit pricing and a shift in deposits toward higher rate certificates of deposit from no and low costs products.
Noninterest income for 2006 grew 8% over 2005 with strong increases in retail banking fees, up 10%, and mortgage warehouse fees, up 58%. The Company also had continued improvement in fees from financial planning services and mortgage banking which increased 6% and 11%, respectively, over 2005.
Noninterest expense was well controlled in 2006, increasing less than 1% compared to 2005.
Colonial improved upon its already excellent credit quality by ending 2006 with a nonperforming assets ratio of 0.16%. Nonperforming assets decreased $6.8 million, or 21%, to $25 million at December 31, 2006. Net charge-offs as a percent of average net loans were 0.12% for 2006. Colonials net charge-off ratio has consistently been lower than the southern regional bank average, as well as the FDIC insured commercial bank average. Colonial increased its allowance for loan losses to $174.9 million at December 31, 2006 compared to $171.1 million at December 31, 2005. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of net loans at December 31, 2006, was 1.13% compared to 1.15% at December 31, 2005.
BancGroups total risk-based capital ratio at December 31, 2006 was 11.77%, and its Tier I risk-based capital ratio was 9.09%, exceeding the minimum regulatory guidelines of 8% and 4%, respectively. The Companys total and Tier I risk-based capital ratios at December 31, 2005 were 12.17% and 9.15%, respectively. The Companys Tier I leverage ratios were 7.81% and 7.77% at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, exceeding the minimum regulatory guideline of 4%.
In 2006, the Company paid dividends of $104.8 million, or $0.68 per share to its shareholders, compared to $89.7 million, or $0.61 per share, in 2005. The Company declared a $0.1875 per share dividend (a 10% increase over 2006) payable on February 9, 2007 to holders of record as of January 26, 2007.
19
Business Combinations
Colonial continues its expansion into high growth areas through selective acquisitions.
On January 23, 2007, Colonial announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire Miami, Florida based Commercial Bankshares, Inc. (Commercial) and its subsidiary Commercial Bank of Florida. Commercial had total assets of $1 billion, total deposits of $841 million and total loans of $611 million at December 31, 2006. Commercial currently operates 14 full service branches in Miami-Dade and Broward counties in south Florida. Under the terms of the agreement, Commercials shareholders will receive in the aggregate, consideration of approximately $157.5 million in cash and 6.5 million shares of Colonial stock. Based on the $24.60 closing price of Colonials common stock on January 22, 2007, the transaction has an aggregate value of $317 million and a value per Commercials share of $49.36. Pending regulatory and Commercial shareholder approval, this transaction is expected to be completed by the end of the second quarter of 2007.
Colonial did not make any acquisitions during 2006. Colonial made two acquisitions in 2005 FFLC Bancorp, Inc. (FFLC) and its subsidiary, First Federal Savings Bank of Lake County, headquartered in Leesburg, Florida, and Union Bank of Florida (Union), headquartered in Sunrise, Florida. For more information about the 2005 acquisitions, refer to Note 2, Business Combinations, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Divestitures
On January 31, 2006, the Company sold its investment in Goldleaf Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation which provides internet and ACH services to community banks. As a result of the sale, the Company removed $9.0 million of net assets, including $8.5 million of goodwill, from the balance sheet and recognized a gain of $2.8 million.
With Colonials strategy of locating in high growth markets, all branch locations are evaluated to determine whether each branch is in the appropriate location, whether the market in which the branch is located is growing and whether the Companys resources are being used effectively. In 2005, Colonial determined that it should exit the northwest Alabama market and deploy its resources into markets with more earnings growth potential. Therefore, the Company sold 17 branches in northwest Alabama and three in southern Tennessee. The branches sold had $514 million in deposits and $83 million in loans. The Company recognized a gain of $37.0 million on the sale of these branches.
Opportunities
The Company has abundant growth opportunities because of its strategic locations. Colonial is currently located in three of the four fastest growing states in the U.S. (Florida, Georgia and Nevada). The Companys successful positioning of operations within high population growth markets has provided not only opportunities for increased loan and deposit growth, but also the ability to enhance the revenue growth from retail activities. The Company expects to continue its expansion plans by adding new branches in Colonials existing footprint to strengthen its ability to grow by improving customer convenience and enhancing sales opportunities.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BancGroups significant accounting policies are presented in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other footnotes, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Those accounting policies involving significant estimates and assumptions by management, which have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and impact comprehensive income, are considered critical accounting
20
policies. BancGroup recognizes the following as critical accounting policies: Allowance for Loan Losses, Purchase Accounting and Goodwill, Income Taxes, Consolidations and Stock-Based Compensation.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Managements ongoing evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance considers both impaired and unimpaired loans and takes into consideration Colonial Banks past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, existing adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and an analysis of current economic conditions. While management believes that it has exercised prudent judgment and applied reasonable assumptions which have resulted in an allowance presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that in the future adverse economic conditions, increased nonperforming loans or other factors will not require further increases in the allowance. A more detailed discussion of BancGroups allowance for loan losses is included in the Risk Management section and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The table below illustrates BancGroups sensitivity to changes in certain factors used in the determination of the allowance for loan losses.
Estimated Effect on 2007 Provision Expense Assuming the Following Changes in Each Determining Factor(2) |
|||||||
Factors |
+10% | -10% | |||||
(In thousands) | |||||||
Loan portfolio size |
$ | 15,544 | $ | (15,548 | ) | ||
Net charge-offs |
2 | (5 | ) | ||||
Criticized loans(1) |
593 | (593 | ) |
(1) | Criticized loans include all loans rated special mention or worse (includes all nonperforming assets and severely past due loans). |
(2) | These computations do not contemplate any action BancGroup could undertake in response to changes in each of these risk factors. |
Purchase Accounting and Goodwill
For an acquisition, BancGroup is required to record the assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, and liabilities assumed at their fair value, which often involves estimates based on third-party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques, which are inherently subjective. The amortization of identifiable intangible assets is based upon the estimated economic benefits to be received, which is also subjective. These estimates also include the establishment of various accruals and allowances based on planned facility dispositions and employee severance considerations, as well as other acquisition-related items.
BancGroup records goodwill in an amount equal to the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. BancGroup tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. The Company has elected to perform its annual testing as of September 30 each year. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which requires management to make judgments in determining the assumptions used in the calculations. The first step involves estimating the fair value of each reporting unit and comparing it to the reporting units carrying value, which includes the allocated goodwill. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, then a second step is performed to measure the actual amount of goodwill impairment. The second step initially involves determining the implied fair value of goodwill. This requires the Company to allocate the estimated fair value to all the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. Any unallocated fair value represents the implied fair value of goodwill which is compared to its corresponding carrying value. If the implied fair value is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that deficit.
Fair values of reporting units were estimated using discounted cash flow models derived from internal earnings forecasts. The key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit included earnings
21
forecasts for five years, terminal values based on future growth rates and discount rates based on the Companys weighted average cost of capital adjusted for the risks associated with the operations of each reporting unit.
The goodwill impairment analysis for 2006 indicated that no impairment write-offs were required. The table below illustrates BancGroups sensitivity to changes in the rates used in discounting the estimated future cash flows. The sensitivity analysis was based on information available as of the annual test date of September 30, 2006. Further discussion regarding BancGroups accounting for goodwill is included at Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Sensitivity of Goodwill Impairment Analysis Results Assuming the Following Changes in Discount Rates(1) | |||||||||
No Change | +10% | - 10% | |||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Total excess of estimated fair value versus carrying value for all reporting units |
$ | 2,386,645 | $ | 1,733,525 | $ | 3,311,301 |
(1) | These computations do not take into account changes in the forecasted cash flows and future annual growth rates. Further, the computations do not contemplate any action BancGroup could undertake in response to changes in the risks associated with the operations of each reporting unit. |
Income Taxes
BancGroup uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Determination of the deferred and current provision requires analysis by management of certain transactions and the related tax laws and regulations. Management exercises significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. Those judgments and estimates are re-evaluated on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change.
Consolidations
The Company enters into a variety of financing and investing arrangements in the normal course of business. Financing arrangements are entered into to meet balance sheet management, funding, liquidity and market or credit risk management needs. Investing arrangements are entered into in order to earn a return on investment. Because certain financing arrangements are made through legal entities and certain investments are in separate legal entities, the Company must evaluate whether or not these entities should be consolidated into the Company for financial reporting. In determining whether the entities involved in these arrangements should be consolidated, the Company first considers the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, which requires a companys consolidated financial statements to include subsidiaries in which the company has a controlling financial interest. This requirement is usually applied to subsidiaries in which a company has a majority voting interest. However, for entities that are not controllable through voting interests or in which the equity investors do not bear the residual economic risks, the Company follows the guidance in FASB Interpretation (FIN) 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. Determining whether a variable interest entity (VIE) should be consolidated requires the Company to make estimates about the VIEs expected losses and expected residual returns, as well as the extent to which those expected losses and expected residual returns will be absorbed by the Company. If the Company absorbs a majority of either, it is considered the primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate the VIE.
Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123(R) which requires all stock-based payments to employees to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock based-compensation under the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 25, which only required the
22
recognition of compensation cost for the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. As such, under APB 25 the Company generally recognized no compensation expense for stock options since the exercise prices equaled the market prices of BancGroup common stock on the grant dates. The Company did, however, recognize compensation cost for restricted stock awards since such awards have no exercise price. Also, under APB 25 the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. Under SFAS 123(R), the Company is required to estimate forfeitures for awards which are not expected to vest.
The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method which does not require the restatement of prior periods to reflect the fair value method of expensing stock-based compensation. SFAS 123(R) does require a cumulative effect adjustment of previously recognized compensation expense in order to estimate forfeitures for awards outstanding on the adoption date. The cumulative effect adjustment was immaterial.
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which requires the input of subjective assumptions including expected option term and expected stock price volatility. Further, the Company now estimates forfeitures for awards granted which are not expected to vest. Changes in these assumptions and estimates can materially affect the calculated fair value of stock-based compensation and the related expense to be recognized. As a result of implementing SFAS 123(R), the Company refined its process for estimating option term and expected stock price volatility.
For options granted during 2006, the expected option term was determined based upon analysis of the Companys historical experience with employees exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. The resulting expected option term was 5.33 years. The expected volatility was determined based upon historical daily prices of the Companys common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected option term, as well as implied price volatility based on the Companys exchange traded options. The indicated historical and implied volatilities were weighted 75% and 25%, respectively. Less emphasis was placed on implied volatility compared to historical volatility because the volume of exchange traded options is relatively low. The resulting weighted average expected volatility was 22.8%. The expected forfeiture rate was determined based on analysis of the Companys historical experience with employees pre-vesting termination behavior.
For options granted during 2005 and 2004, the expected option term was determined based on consideration of the option attributes (five year graded vesting; ten year total option life) as well as the guidance of SFAS 123 which stated that when presented with a range of reasonable estimates for expected option life, if no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, it is appropriate to use an estimate at the low end of the range. The resulting expected option term was 5 years. The expected volatility was determined based on analysis of historical monthly prices of the Companys common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected option term. The resulting weighted average expected volatility was 25.0% and 26.8% for 2005 and 2004, respectively.
As of December 31, 2006, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards was $9.5 million. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years.
REVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Colonial had record earnings per diluted share of $1.72 for the year ended 2006, a 13% increase over 2005. The Company also reported record net income of $266 million for the year ended 2006, a 16% increase over 2005.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is BancGroups primary source of revenue. Net interest income represents the difference between the interest and related fee income generated from earning assets and the interest expense
23
paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rate volatility, which impacts the volume and mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities as well as their rates, can significantly impact net interest income. The net interest margin is fully taxable equivalent net interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets for the period being measured. The net interest margin is presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis to consistently reflect income from taxable and tax-exempt loans and securities.
Beginning in 2004, short-term rates increased at a faster pace than long-term rates. The short-term rates were driven by rate increases by the Federal Reserve while the long-term rates were driven by market supply and demand for debt instruments. The yield curve flattened throughout 2005 and ultimately inverted in 2006. The following tables show the U.S. Treasury yield curves at each quarter end during 2006 and 2005.
BancGroups net interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, grew by $46 million, or 6%, in 2006 compared to 2005. The increase was primarily driven by strong growth in average earning assets. BancGroups primary funding sources include deposits and wholesale borrowings. The average balance of BancGroups funding sources also grew in 2006. Funding costs increased seven basis points more than the yields on average earning assets resulting in net interest margin compression of four basis points from 3.75% to 3.71%.
24
Interest Earning Assets
Average earning assets, as shown in the tables above, consist primarily of loans, mortgage warehouse assets and investment securities. Approximately 66% of BancGroups average earning assets are either variable, adjustable or short-term in nature. Average earning assets grew $1.5 billion, or 8%, compared to 2005, and yielded 7.14%, a 100 basis points increase. The growth in average earning assets was primarily in average loans, excluding mortgage warehouse, which grew 12% over 2005. The yield on loans, excluding mortgage warehouse, increased 95 basis points over 2005. Approximately 72% of BancGroups loan portfolio, excluding mortgage warehouse, is variable or adjustable rate and increases in rate when market rates rise. Mortgage warehouse assets consist of loans, loans held for sale and securities purchased under agreements to resell which are variable rate. Average mortgage warehouse assets increased $275 million, or 14%, in 2006 compared to 2005. The yield on mortgage warehouse assets increased 139 basis points in 2006 over 2005.
The growth in loans and mortgage warehouse assets was partially offset by a reduction in average securities of 11%. Average securities were 15% of average earning assets in 2006, down from 18% in 2005. The reduction in the securities portfolio was the result of BancGroups continued effort to remove lower yielding assets from the balance sheet and pay down higher rate borrowings. The yield on the securities portfolio increased 51 basis points in 2006 compared to 2005. The increase in yield is attributed to the execution of several transactions in the securities portfolio. In 2005, BancGroup began selling securities that had lower overall performance characteristics than the average portfolio in changing interest rate environments.
Funding Sources
25
Average funding sources grew $1.6 billion in 2006 compared to 2005. Average deposits grew $1.8 billion, or 13%. The strong growth in average deposits in 2006 funded the growth in average earning assets. Average deposits funded 77% of average earning assets in 2006 compared to 74% in 2005.
BancGroups growth in average deposits in 2006 was primarily in certificates of deposit, which have a higher cost than most other deposits. Time deposits comprised 70% of BancGroups total average deposit growth in 2006. With the increased market rates during 2006, deposit customers migrated towards higher cost deposits away from low or no cost transaction accounts. As a result of customer preference for higher cost deposits and the continued maturities of time deposits in a higher rate environment, BancGroups total cost of deposits increased 102 basis points. Due to increases in the federal funds rates during 2005 and the beginning of 2006, wholesale borrowing costs increased 162 basis points over 2005. Increased funding cost is the primary reason the net interest margin contracted four basis points in 2006.
26
Average Volume and Rates
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Volume |
Interest | Average Rate |
Average Volume |
Interest | Average Rate |
Average Volume |
Interest | Average Rate |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest earning assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, excluding mortgage warehouse loans, net of unearned income(4) |
$ | 14,991,675 | $ | 1,141,971 | 7.62 | % | $ | 13,411,323 | $ | 894,545 | 6.67 | % | $ | 11,115,275 | $ | 625,455 | 5.63 | % | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
348,024 | 23,946 | 6.88 | % | 728,057 | 38,526 | 5.29 | % | 1,033,238 | 42,749 | 4.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans, net of unearned income(1) |
15,339,699 | 1,165,917 | 7.60 | % | 14,139,380 | 933,071 | 6.60 | % | 12,148,513 | 668,204 | 5.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale(4) |
1,374,115 | 92,921 | 6.76 | % | 823,177 | 46,247 | 5.62 | % | 497,315 | 23,972 | 4.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Held to maturity securities and securities available for sale(4): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
2,823,409 | 141,918 | 5.03 | % | 3,204,634 | 145,674 | 4.55 | % | 3,196,804 | 144,299 | 4.51 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Nontaxable |
45,497 | 2,967 | 6.52 | % | 47,755 | 3,321 | 6.95 | % | 65,827 | 4,633 | 7.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
145,547 | 8,498 | 5.84 | % | 148,393 | 6,834 | 4.61 | % | 134,369 | 5,278 | 3.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total securities |
3,014,453 | 153,383 | 5.09 | % | 3,400,782 | 155,829 | 4.58 | % | 3,397,000 | 154,210 | 4.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
592,840 | 40,176 | 6.78 | % | 489,688 | 25,329 | 5.17 | % | 76,554 | 2,579 | 3.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments |
88,799 | 4,434 | 4.99 | % | 90,484 | 3,034 | 3.35 | % | 54,157 | 863 | 1.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets(2) |
20,409,906 | $ | 1,456,831 | 7.14 | % | 18,943,511 | $ | 1,163,510 | 6.14 | % | 16,173,539 | $ | 849,828 | 5.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(175,060 | ) | (163,348 | ) | (148,208 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
376,815 | 402,528 | 328,713 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
362,142 | 295,073 | 263,134 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on available for sale securities |
(81,613 | ) | (39,889 | ) | (12,783 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets(4) |
1,345,500 | 1,244,435 | 829,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 22,237,690 | $ | 20,682,310 | $ | 17,433,571 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing demand deposits |
$ | 4,886,875 | $ | 137,986 | 2.82 | % | $ | 4,540,854 | $ | 68,874 | 1.52 | % | $ | 4,092,590 | $ | 40,217 | 0.98 | % | |||||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
1,223,991 | 33,574 | 2.74 | % | 1,042,184 | 21,761 | 2.09 | % | 547,359 | 2,497 | 0.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits(4) |
6,708,168 | 297,729 | 4.44 | % | 5,443,983 | 182,898 | 3.36 | % | 4,014,706 | 105,422 | 2.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
867,534 | 37,327 | 4.30 | % | 878,371 | 20,518 | 2.34 | % | 658,000 | 5,728 | 0.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
1,119,169 | 57,464 | 5.13 | % | 1,760,970 | 54,877 | 3.12 | % | 2,248,035 | 32,575 | 1.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt(4) |
2,324,505 | 136,237 | 5.86 | % | 2,153,881 | 103,906 | 4.82 | % | 2,264,698 | 94,331 | 4.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
17,130,242 | $ | 700,317 | 4.09 | % | 15,820,243 | $ | 452,834 | 2.86 | % | 13,825,388 | $ | 280,770 | 2.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing demand deposits |
2,969,285 | 2,960,504 | 2,207,385 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities(4) |
145,391 | 122,482 | 115,026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
20,244,918 | 18,903,229 | 16,147,799 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
1,992,772 | 1,779,081 | 1,285,772 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 22,237,690 | $ | 20,682,310 | $ | 17,433,571 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate differential |
3.05 | % | 3.28 | % | 3.22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income and net yield on interest earning assets on a tax equivalent basis(3) |
756,514 | 3.71 | % | 710,676 | 3.75 | % | 569,058 | 3.52 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable equivalent adjustments(2): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
(325 | ) | (423 | ) | (375 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held to maturity securities and securities available for sale |
(921 | ) | (1,031 | ) | (1,435 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total taxable equivalent adjustments |
(1,246 | ) | (1,454 | ) | (1,810 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 755,268 | $ | 709,222 | $ | 567,248 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Loans classified as non-accruing are included in the average volume calculation. Interest income on loans includes loan fees of $48,420, $48,767, and $42,788 for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
(2) | Interest earned and average rates on securities and loans exempt from income taxes are reflected on a fully tax equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 35%, net of nondeductible interest expense. |
(3) | Net yield on interest earning assets is calculated by taking net interest income divided by average total interest earning assets. |
(4) | The adjustments for mark to market valuations on hedged assets and liabilities have been classified in either other assets or other liabilities. |
27
Analysis of Interest Increases (Decreases)
2006 Change From 2005 | 2005 Change From 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Attributed To(1) | Attributed To(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Volume | Rate | Amount | Volume | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, excluding mortgage warehouse loans, net of unearned income |
$ | 247,426 | $ | 120,018 | $ | 127,408 | $ | 269,090 | $ | 153,491 | $ | 115,599 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
(14,580 | ) | (26,156 | ) | 11,576 | (4,223 | ) | (16,105 | ) | 11,882 | ||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
46,674 | 37,290 | 9,384 | 22,275 | 18,296 | 3,979 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taxable securities |
(3,756 | ) | (19,138 | ) | 15,382 | 1,375 | 96 | 1,279 | ||||||||||||||||
Nontaxable securities |
(354 | ) | (149 | ) | (205 | ) | (1,312 | ) | (1,253 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
1,664 | (161 | ) | 1,825 | 1,556 | 642 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||
Total securities |
(2,446 | ) | (19,448 | ) | 17,002 | 1,619 | (515 | ) | 2,134 | |||||||||||||||
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
14,847 | 6,963 | 7,884 | 22,750 | 21,372 | 1,378 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments |
1,400 | (84 | ) | 1,484 | 2,171 | 1,218 | 953 | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
293,321 | 118,583 | 174,738 | 313,682 | 177,757 | 135,925 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing demand deposits |
69,112 | 10,081 | 59,031 | 28,657 | 6,557 | 22,100 | ||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
11,813 | 5,039 | 6,774 | 19,264 | 10,342 | 8,922 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
114,831 | 56,036 | 58,795 | 77,476 | 48,169 | 29,307 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
16,809 | (407 | ) | 17,216 | 14,790 | 5,117 | 9,673 | |||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
2,587 | (32,808 | ) | 35,395 | 22,302 | (15,240 | ) | 37,542 | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
32,331 | 9,931 | 22,400 | 9,575 | (5,146 | ) | 14,721 | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
247,483 | 47,872 | 199,611 | 172,064 | 49,799 | 122,265 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 45,838 | $ | 70,711 | $ | (24,873 | ) | $ | 141,618 | $ | 127,958 | $ | 13,660 | |||||||||||
(1) | Increases (decreases) are attributed to volume changes and rate changes on the following basis: Volume Change = change in volume times old rate. Rate Change = change in rate times old volume. The Rate/Volume Change = change in volume times change in rate, and is included in Volume Change above. |
Loan Loss Provision
The provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $22.1 million compared to $26.8 million for 2005. The provision for loan losses exceeded net charge-offs for both 2006 and 2005 by $3.8 million and $7.6 million, respectively. Net charge-offs were 0.12% and 0.14% of average loans for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
At December 31, 2006, BancGroups allowance for loan losses was $174.9 million, up $3.8 million over December 31, 2005. The allowance for loan losses represented 1.13% of period end net loans at December 31, 2006 compared to 1.15% at December 31, 2005. The allowance covered nonperforming loans by 1247% at December 31, 2006 compared to 662% at December 31, 2005. For more information, refer to the Allowance for Loan Losses discussion presented in the Risk Management section of Managements Discussion and Analysis.
28
Noninterest Income
The following chart details the Companys noninterest income by category for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
(1) | Other income consists primarily of net cash settlement and change in fair value of swap derivatives, securities and derivatives gains (losses), equity investment income, real estate joint venture income and gains from the sale of Goldleaf, branches and bank premises. |
29
Total noninterest income increased $13.2 million, or 7.5% over 2005. Core noninterest income increased $6.0 million, or 3.4%, from 2005 to 2006.
Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | 2006 Compared to 2005 |
% | 2005 Compared to 2004 |
% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
$ | 65,071 | $ | 58,302 | $ | 58,467 | $ | 6,769 | 11.6 | % | $ | (165 | ) | (0.3 | )% | ||||||||||
Electronic banking |
17,212 | 15,324 | 12,604 | 1,888 | 12.3 | 2,720 | 21.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other retail banking fees |
14,436 | 14,022 | 11,292 | 414 | 3.0 | 2,730 | 24.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking fees |
96,719 | 87,648 | 82,363 | 9,071 | 10.3 | % | 5,285 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Financial planning services |
14,054 | 13,211 | 13,370 | 843 | 6.4 | (159 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage banking |
13,540 | 12,228 | 8,433 | 1,312 | 10.7 | 3,795 | 45.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage warehouse fees |
25,323 | 16,055 | 1,244 | 9,268 | 57.7 | 14,811 | NM | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank-owned life insurance |
15,954 | 13,942 | 10,261 | 2,012 | 14.4 | 3,681 | 35.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goldleaf income |
1,171 | 10,163 | 7,610 | (8,992 | ) | (88.5 | ) | 2,553 | 33.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash settlement of swap derivatives |
| 10,298 | 16,567 | (10,298 | ) | NM | (6,269 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||||||
Other income |
14,860 | 12,118 | 6,202 | 2,742 | 22.6 | 5,916 | 95.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Core noninterest income |
181,621 | 175,663 | 146,050 | 5,958 | 3.4 | 29,613 | 20.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities and derivatives gains (losses), net |
4,772 | (24,654 | ) | 7,544 | 29,426 | NM | (32,198 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of swap derivatives |
| (12,053 | ) | (393 | ) | 12,053 | NM | (11,660 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of Goldleaf |
2,829 | | | 2,829 | NM | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of branches |
| 37,020 | | (37,020 | ) | NM | 37,020 | NM | |||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
$ | 189,222 | $ | 175,976 | $ | 153,201 | $ | 13,246 | 7.5 | % | $ | 22,775 | 14.9 | % | |||||||||||
Retail banking fees increased 10.3% from 2005 to 2006 primarily due to an increase of $6.8 million in service charges on deposit accounts. Service charges on deposit accounts is comprised of service charges on consumer and commercial deposit accounts and nonsufficient funds fees. Nonsufficient funds fees is the largest component of the increase from 2005 to 2006. The increase in nonsufficient funds fees is primarily due to an increase in the number of customer accounts in conjunction with customers maintaining lower balances in those accounts.
Electronic banking includes Colonials ATM network, business and personal check card services and internet banking. Noninterest income from electronic banking services increased primarily as the result of an increase in the number of Colonial customer accounts which increased check card usage and ATM network fees from 2005 to 2006.
The primary components of other retail banking fees are check and money order fees, merchant services and check printing charges. The increase in other retail banking fees from 2005 to 2006 was primarily due to increases in check and money order fees and merchant services, partially offset by a decrease in check printing charges.
Financial planning services include discount brokerage, investment sales, asset management, trust services and insurance sales including term, universal, whole life and long-term care. The increase in financial planning services from 2005 to 2006 was primarily due to an increase in the volume of securities and fixed annuities sold, partially offset by a decline in trust revenues and the volume of insurance products sold.
Mortgage banking income is generated from loans originated and subsequently sold in the secondary market. The Company does not retain any servicing rights related to these loans. The increase in mortgage
30
banking income from 2005 to 2006 was due to an increase in sales volume of $113 million, or 18.3%. Mortgage banking income did not increase in proportion to the increased sales volume due to greater competition for mortgage loans resulting in lower profit margin on the sale of mortgages. The Company was able to increase production by expanding its number of mortgage loan originators and providing excellent customer service despite a challenging mortgage environment that resulted in a decline in industry wide mortgage production.
The Company sells certain mortgage warehouse loans and mortgage loans held for sale to a wholly-owned special purpose entity which then sells interests in those assets to third-party commercial paper conduits. The third-party conduits pay the Company servicing and other fees based on a percentage of the outstanding balance of the assets sold. The average balances of these assets sold increased from $858 million in 2005 to $1.7 billion in 2006. Mortgage warehouse fees associated with these assets increased $8.2 million, or 58.7%, in 2006, but did not increase in proportion to the interests sold due to decreased spreads. Mortgage warehouse fees include additional fees to provide mortgage document custodial services to mortgage warehouse customers.
Income from bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) increased from 2005 to 2006 primarily due to proceeds from death benefits received during 2006 and the purchase of $100 million of BOLI in December 2006 bringing the total balance invested at December 31, 2006 to $458 million.
The Company sold its investment in Goldleaf Technologies, Inc. in January 2006. The Company recognized a gain of $2.8 million on the sale.
Other noninterest income increased from 2005 to 2006 primarily due to increases in real estate joint venture income and condo association coupon fees, partially offset by lower net gains on the sale of bank premises and other assets.
The net cash settlement of swap derivatives recorded during 2005 was related to interest rate swaps not designated as hedging instruments. The Company recognized a loss from the change in fair value of these swap derivatives of $12.1 million in 2005. These swaps were terminated or redesignated as hedging instruments in the first quarter of 2006.
The Companys decisions to buy and sell securities are based on its management of interest rate risk and projected liquidity and funding needs. Colonial recognized net gains of $2.3 million from the sale of $988 million of securities and an additional gain of $2.5 million related to trading derivatives that had a notional value of $155 million in 2006. The Company sold $1.1 billion of securities and declared its intent to sell another $481 million of securities in 2005, incurring net losses of $24.7 million.
The Company recognized a $37 million gain on the sale of 20 branches during 2005, 17 in Alabama and three in Tennessee. Approximately $83 million in loans and $514 million in deposits were included in the sale.
31
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expenses were well controlled in 2006 and increased less than 1% over 2005.
Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, | 2006 Compared to 2005 |
% | 2005 Compared to 2004 |
% | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
$ | 280,025 | $ | 262,713 | $ | 218,095 | $ | 17,312 | 6.6 | % | $ | 44,618 | 20.5 | % | |||||||||
Occupancy expense of bank premises, net |
67,338 | 62,666 | 53,167 | 4,672 | 7.5 | 9,499 | 17.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Furniture and equipment expenses |
48,585 | 43,653 | 38,300 | 4,932 | 11.3 | 5,353 | 14.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Professional services |
19,090 | 22,091 | 19,356 | (3,001 | ) | (13.6 | ) | 2,735 | 14.1 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
12,209 | 11,528 | 6,364 | 681 | 5.9 | 5,164 | 81.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Advertising |
10,782 | 12,227 | 8,477 | (1,445 | ) | (11.8 | ) | 3,750 | 44.2 | ||||||||||||||
Communications |
10,845 | 10,278 | 10,692 | 567 | 5.5 | (414 | ) | (3.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Merger related expenses |
| 4,196 | 1,999 | (4,196 | ) | (100.0 | ) | 2,197 | 109.9 | ||||||||||||||
Goldleaf expense |
1,025 | 9,195 | 6,953 | (8,170 | ) | (88.9 | ) | 2,242 | 32.2 | ||||||||||||||
Net losses related to the early extinguishment of debt |
| 9,550 | 7,436 | (9,550 | ) | (100.0 | ) | 2,114 | 28.4 | ||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
69,702 | 67,158 | 60,810 | 2,544 | 3.8 | 6,348 | 10.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
$ | 519,601 | $ | 515,255 | $ | 431,649 | $ | 4,346 | 0.8 | % | $ | 83,606 | 19.4 | % | |||||||||
The increase in salaries and employee benefits primarily relates to normal salary increases and increased incentive plan compensation. The number of average full-time equivalent employees increased from approximately 4,500 in 2005 to 4,700 in 2006. Increased incentive plan compensation relates to loan and deposit volumes as well as financial results of the Company and various components thereof.
The increase in occupancy and furniture and equipment expense was primarily the result of increased facilities repairs and maintenance and increased software costs.
Professional services decreased due to lower legal fees arising from reduced usage of outside legal services.
The decrease in advertising expense resulted from increased usage of direct mail in 2006 rather than print advertising.
In 2005, BancGroup completed the acquisition of Union which added 17 full service branches in several counties in southeast Florida. Additionally in 2005, BancGroup completed the acquisition of FFLC which added 16 full service branches in central Florida. The results of operations for 2005 include pretax merger related expenses of $4.2 million as compared to $2.0 million for the 2004 acquisition of P.C.B. Bancorp, Inc. These costs are comprised of travel, training, marketing, and incremental charges related to the integration of acquired banks, such as system conversions and customer supplies. Refer to the Business Combinations section of the Executive Overview for further information regarding business combinations.
The 2005 net losses related to the early extinguishment of debt resulted from prepayment penalties incurred for the early repayment of FHLB advances.
Goldleaf expense decreased due to the sale of Goldleaf in January 2006.
Other noninterest expenses increased primarily due to increases in travel expenses of $1.6 million and greater expenses related to loan closings of $1.2 million in 2006 as compared to 2005.
32
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 34.0% in 2006 and 33.4% in 2005. BancGroup is subject to a statutory federal tax rate of 35% and various state tax rates. For further information concerning the provision for income taxes, refer to Note 21, Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
REVIEW OF STATEMENT OF CONDITION
Loans
Management emphasizes the importance of maintaining excellent credit quality while growing loans. Management believes that its strategy of using local lending expertise and a strong committee approval process has proven to be successful. Average loans, excluding mortgage warehouse lending, grew 12% in 2006 while period end loans grew 5%.
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, agricultural |
$ | 1,158,755 | $ | 1,107,494 | $ | 1,008,741 | $ | 985,059 | $ | 1,037,356 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
4,291,979 | 4,424,465 | 4,270,817 | 4,136,976 | 3,771,993 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate construction |
6,340,324 | 5,483,424 | 3,936,800 | 3,074,223 | 2,743,281 | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
2,987,212 | 3,048,007 | 2,228,648 | 1,988,851 | 1,951,799 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer and other |
438,375 | 372,470 | 315,386 | 433,330 | 528,506 | |||||||||||||||
Total loans, excluding mortgage warehouse loans |
15,216,645 | 14,435,860 | 11,760,392 | 10,618,439 | 10,032,935 | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
281,693 | 483,701 | 1,114,923 | 982,488 | 1,671,149 | |||||||||||||||
Total loans |
15,498,338 | 14,919,561 | 12,875,315 | 11,600,927 | 11,704,084 | |||||||||||||||
Less: unearned income |
(19,449 | ) | (19,697 | ) | (17,504 | ) | (12,032 | ) | (11,654 | ) | ||||||||||
Total loans, net of unearned income |
$ | 15,478,889 | $ | 14,899,864 | $ | 12,857,811 | $ | 11,588,895 | $ | 11,692,430 | ||||||||||
33
The increase in loans, excluding mortgage warehouse loans, in 2006 over 2005 was primarily driven by growth in construction loans. The construction portfolio consists predominantly of loans to finance construction projects along with developed lots and land within the Companys banking markets. The growth in this category during 2006 was mostly in residential property types (residential lots, land zoned residential and home construction). While residential real estate markets have cooled in certain markets within the Companys footprint, the economies in Nevada, Texas, Florida, Georgia and Alabama remained strong.
The contractual maturities of loans may vary significantly from actual maturities due to loan extensions, early payoffs due to refinancing and other factors. Fluctuations in interest rates are also a major factor in early loan payoffs. The uncertainties of future events, particularly with respect to interest rates, make it difficult to predict the actual maturities. The following table represents the contractual maturities of loans at December 31, 2006.
Loan Maturity/Rate Sensitivity
Maturing | Rate Sensitivity | Rate Sensitivity, Loans Maturing Over 1 Year | |||||||||||||||||||
Within 1 Year |
1-5 Years | Over 5 Years |
Fixed | Floating/ Adjustable |
Fixed | Floating/ Adjustable | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
$ | 552,889 | $ | 432,019 | $ | 173,847 | $ | 349,765 | $ | 808,990 | $ | 240,469 | $ | 365,397 | |||||||
Commercial real estate |
781,306 | 2,366,213 | 1,144,460 | 2,250,334 | 2,041,645 | 2,007,070 | 1,503,603 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate construction |
3,878,671 | 2,231,212 | 230,441 | 742,522 | 5,597,802 | 489,607 | 1,972,046 | ||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
236,276 | 476,915 | 2,274,021 | 577,067 | 2,410,145 | 508,530 | 2,242,406 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer and other |
206,449 | 123,765 | 108,161 | 274,573 | 163,802 | 171,059 | 60,867 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
281,693 | | | | 281,693 | | | ||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 5,937,284 | $ | 5,630,124 | $ | 3,930,930 | $ | 4,194,261 | $ | 11,304,077 | $ | 3,416,735 | $ | 6,144,319 | |||||||
For additional discussion of loans, refer to the Risk Management section.
Mortgage Warehouse Assets
Mortgage warehouse assets consist of loans, short-term participations in mortgage loans held for sale and securities purchased under agreements to resell. Mortgage warehouse loans represent lines of credit available to mortgage origination companies used to originate mortgage loans to their customers. Short-term participations in mortgage loans held for sale are another source of funding provided to these companies in which Colonial purchases participations in certain mortgage loans which have commitments to be sold to third-party investor institutions. Securities purchased under agreements to resell represent mortgage-backed securities which have been securitized by these companies and are under agreements to be sold to third-party investors. Colonial purchases these securities prior to their initial settlements with those investors.
Colonial has a facility in which it sells certain mortgage warehouse loans and short-term participations in mortgage loans held for sale to a wholly-owned special purpose entity which then sells interests in these assets to third-party commercial paper conduits (conduits). A total of $1.5 billion was sold to the conduits in 2005. During August 2006, an additional $500 million of interests were sold to the conduits bringing the total outstanding balance to $2 billion at December 31, 2006. Refer to Note 6, Sales and Servicing of Financial Assets, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
34
A summary of the major components of mortgage warehouse assets is shown in the table below:
December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
$ | 605,937 | $ | 589,902 | ||
Loans held for sale |
1,422,980 | 1,058,082 | ||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
281,693 | 483,701 | ||||
Total mortgage warehouse assets on balance sheet |
2,310,610 | 2,131,685 | ||||
Interests sold |
2,000,000 | 1,500,000 | ||||
Total mortgage warehouse assets under management |
$ | 4,310,610 | $ | 3,631,685 | ||
Total mortgage warehouse assets under management increased $678.9 million, or 18.7%, from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006. As a result of BancGroups high quality customer service, the Company has been able to increase warehouse balances through the addition of new customers as well as increased share of existing customers business despite a challenging mortgage environment and the resulting decline in industry wide mortgage production.
35
Securities
BancGroup determines the funds available for investment based upon anticipated loan and deposit growth, liquidity needs and pledging requirements, as well as other factors. An investment strategy is developed based on these factors, along with BancGroups balance sheet position and relative value opportunities in the market.
All securities are either classified as held to maturity or available for sale. Held to maturity securities are those securities which management has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. The carrying value of held to maturity securities was $1.9 million at the end of 2006 compared to $3.0 million at the end of 2005. The current year decline was due to paydowns, maturities and calls in the portfolio while BancGroup did not reinvest in any held to maturity securities. Securities classified as held to maturity consisted primarily of U.S. Treasury bonds, agency mortgage-backed securities and municipal obligations.
Securities available for sale represent those securities that the Company intends to hold for an indefinite period of time and may be sold in response to changes in BancGroups interest rate risk position, prepayment risk or other similar factors. These securities are recorded at market value with unrealized gains or losses, net of any tax effect, added to or deducted from shareholders equity. Unrealized net losses on securities available for sale was a pretax loss of $54.0 million at December 31, 2006 compared to $53.1 million at December 31, 2005. The unrealized losses, net of income taxes, are reflected in the Companys shareholders equity in the amount of $34.5 million and $35.1 million at December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2006, available for sale securities totaled $3.1 billion, or 99.9% of the total securities portfolio, compared to $2.8 billion, or 99.9%, at December 31, 2005. The following chart details the Companys available for sale securities at December 31, 2006 by category:
36
The composition of the Companys securities portfolio is reflected in the following table.
Securities by Category
Carrying Value at December 31, | ||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Held to maturity securities: |
||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities |
$ | 500 | $ | 500 | $ | 500 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities of Government Sponsored Entities |
736 | 957 | 1,366 | |||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations of Government Sponsored Entities |
11 | 13 | 18 | |||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
627 | 1,480 | 4,241 | |||||||||
Other |
| | 27 | |||||||||
Total held to maturity securities |
1,874 | 2,950 | 6,152 | |||||||||
Securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities |
166,481 | 184,557 | 187,770 | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities of Government Sponsored Entities |
352,075 | 359,691 | 338,446 | |||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations of Government Sponsored Entities |
660,780 | 698,763 | 1,144,173 | |||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations |
1,670,973 | 1,412,004 | 1,741,079 | |||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
78,603 | 42,056 | 55,539 | |||||||||
Other |
154,702 | 144,333 | 180,395 | |||||||||
Total securities available for sale |
3,083,614 | 2,841,404 | 3,647,402 | |||||||||
Total securities |
$ | 3,085,488 | $ | 2,844,354 | $ | 3,653,554 | ||||||
Securities to total assets |
13.5 | % | 13.3 | % | 19.3 | % | ||||||
Average securities to average earning assets |
14.4 | % | 18.0 | % | 21.0 | % | ||||||
Average duration (excluding equities) |
4.45 years | 3.51 years | 3.64 years | |||||||||
37
The maturities of the Companys securities portfolio at December 31, 2006 are as follows:
Contractual Maturity Distribution of Securities(2)
Within 1 Year | 1-5 Years | 5-10 Years | Over 10 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Average Rate |
Amount | Average Rate |
Amount | Average Rate |
Amount | Average Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held to maturity securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities |
$ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | 500 | 7.25 | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of Government Sponsored Entities |
2 | 7.79 | % | 245 | 7.20 | % | | | % | 500 | 7.33 | % | ||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions(1) |
140 | 6.74 | % | 232 | 7.76 | % | 255 | 8.41 | % | | | % | ||||||||||||
Total held to maturity securities |
142 | 6.76 | % | 477 | 7.47 | % | 755 | 7.64 | % | 500 | 7.33 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities |
| | % | | | % | 118,631 | 4.08 | % | 47,850 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities of Government Sponsored Entities |
19 | 7.26 | % | 2,355 | 6.51 | % | 6,210 | 5.45 | % | 343,491 | 5.05 | % | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations of Government Sponsored Entities |
| | % | 35 | 4.05 | % | | | % | 660,745 | 5.01 | % | ||||||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations |
| | % | | | % | 30,846 | 5.00 | % | 1,640,127 | 5.42 | % | ||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions(1) |
7,119 | 6.86 | % | 13,672 | 6.44 | % | 4,313 | 6.49 | % | 53,499 | 5.86 | % | ||||||||||||
Other |
154,702 | 5.81 | % | | | % | | | % | | | % | ||||||||||||
Total available for sale securities |
161,840 | 5.86 | % | 16,062 | 6.44 | % | 160,000 | 4.38 | % | 2,745,712 | 5.28 | % | ||||||||||||
Total Securities |
$ | 161,982 | 5.86 | % | $ | 16,539 | 6.47 | % | $ | 160,755 | 4.39 | % | $ | 2,746,212 | 5.28 | % | ||||||||
(1) | The weighted average yields are calculated on the basis of the cost and effective yield weighted for the scheduled maturity of each security. The taxable equivalent adjustment represents the annual amounts of income from tax exempt obligations multiplied by 145%. |
(2) | These are contractual maturities, expected and actual maturities could differ from contractual maturities because underlying borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without call or prepayment penalties. |
38
Deposits
BancGroups period end deposit structure consists of the following:
December 31, | % of Total | |||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing demand deposits |
$ | 2,869,845 | $ | 3,167,875 | 17.8 | % | 20.5 | % | ||||
Interest bearing demand deposits |
5,531,036 | 4,095,166 | 34.4 | 26.4 | ||||||||
Savings deposits |
691,782 | 1,749,902 | 4.3 | 11.3 | ||||||||
Transaction accounts |
9,092,663 | 9,012,943 | 56.5 | 58.2 | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000 |
3,256,129 | 2,796,754 | 20.2 | 18.1 | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit $100,000 or more |
2,864,798 | 2,428,816 | 17.8 | 15.7 | ||||||||
Other time deposits |
475,900 | 436,145 | 3.0 | 2.8 | ||||||||
Retail deposits |
15,689,490 | 14,674,658 | 97.5 | 94.8 | ||||||||
Brokered certificates of deposit |
401,564 | 808,791 | 2.5 | 5.2 | ||||||||
Total deposits |
$ | 16,091,054 | $ | 15,483,449 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
BancGroup is continuing to grow deposits throughout its market areas. In 2006, customer demand shifted from lower cost and no cost deposits to higher cost interest bearing demand deposits and certificates of deposit. Total average deposits for 2006 increased 13% over 2005. Average time deposits for this period grew 23%; while average nontime deposits grew 6%. As a result, the mix of non-time deposits decreased to 56.5% of total deposits from 58.2% of total deposits at the end of the prior year. As market demographics change, products and services are restructured to meet the needs of a particular region or customer base. Strong regional management, supported by BancGroups marketing and treasury departments, provide the Company with resources and products to remain competitive in its deposit markets.
The following chart details BancGroups deposit base by state at December 31, 2006:
Total Deposit Base
39
At December 31, 2006, the scheduled maturities of time deposits in amounts of $100,000 or more were as follows:
Months to Maturity |
(In thousands) | ||
3 or less |
$ | 1,144,395 | |
Over 3 through 6 |
929,294 | ||
Over 6 through 12 |
726,824 | ||
Over 12 |
207,118 | ||
Total |
$ | 3,007,631 | |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As a financial services provider, the Company routinely commits to extend credit, including loan commitments, letters of credit and financial guarantees. A significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process used for loans. Also, in the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into indemnification agreements, including underwriting agreements relating to offers and sales of its securities, acquisition agreements and various other business arrangements, such as relationships arising from service as a director or officer of BancGroup or its subsidiaries. Additionally, during 2005 the Company issued a residual value guarantee in connection with the lease of a new corporate headquarters. For more information regarding off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 7, Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations
The Company enters into contractual obligations in the ordinary course of business, including debt issuances for the funding of operations, and leases for premises and equipment. The table below summarizes contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006 except for obligations of short-term borrowing arrangements and pension and postretirement benefits plans. More information on these obligations is contained in Note 13, Short-Term Borrowings, and Note 17, Employee Benefit Plans.
The Company also enters into derivatives, which create contractual obligations, as part of its interest rate risk management process. For more information, see the Interest Rate Risk section and Note 9, Derivatives.
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations |
Total | Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | After 5 Years | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt(1) |
$ | 2,588,752 | $ | 32,611 | $ | 74,903 | $ | 96,921 | $ | 2,384,317 | |||||
Operating leases |
256,676 | 35,886 | 60,536 | 48,942 | 111,312 | ||||||||||
Capital leases |
4,678 | 2,732 | 643 | 324 | 979 | ||||||||||
Time deposits |
6,998,391 | 6,400,544 | 417,567 | 80,708 | 99,572 | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 9,848,497 | $ | 6,471,773 | $ | 553,649 | $ | 226,895 | $ | 2,596,180 | |||||
(1) | Excludes purchase accounting fair value adjustments, hedge accounting fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums and discounts. |
40
RISK MANAGEMENT
Credit Risk Management
Colonial has some measure of credit risk in most of its primary banking activities, but the majority of this risk is associated with lending. Colonials Credit Risk Management philosophy has historically been and continues to be, focused on establishing and administering policies and procedures such that Colonials credit quality has outperformed Colonials peers in most economic environments. Consistent with this philosophy, Colonial has maintained conservative underwriting and credit product standards and has generally avoided nontraditional credit products. The Companys credit risk management process is centered on comprehensive credit and underwriting policies and procedures, a strong and effective loan approval process, continual audit and review functions, and experienced credit professionals at the regional, business-line and BancGroup levels. In addition, Colonial has a credit risk reporting and analysis group which falls under the supervision of the Chief Credit Officer. This group continually evaluates changes in credit risk, monitors large concentrations and exposures of all types and locations, and implements Colonial Banks allowance methodology. Colonial also has a special assets/collections group which is charged with minimizing losses, maximizing recoveries, and implementing strategies to reduce problem asset levels. In addition, the internal auditor and regulatory examiners review and perform detailed tests of the Companys credit risk management activities, such as credit underwriting, loan administration, and the allowance process. The overall goals of Colonials credit risk management activities include providing a sound basis for new credit extensions and early recognition of problems/risks so that it can maintain a high quality loan portfolio and achieve long-term earnings growth.
In addition to lending, credit risk is present in Colonials securities portfolio, derivative instruments and in certain deposit activities. Colonial Banks treasury and deposit departments have credit risk management processes in place in order to manage credit risk in these activities.
Loan Approval and Underwriting
The Chief Credit Officer, who reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer, provides company-wide credit oversight through a senior credit administration function. This function reviews larger credits prior to approval and also provides an independent review of credits on a continual basis. In addition, the Company has established regional loan committees made up of local officers and directors that approve loans up to certain dollar levels. These committees provide local business and market expertise while BancGroups senior management provides independent oversight by participating in the state loan committees. Loans to the Companys largest borrowers and loans originated out of specialized business units may go through these committees for approval, but also may go through additional committees established by the Board of Directors and administered by the Chief Credit Officer.
BancGroup has standard policies and procedures for the evaluation and underwriting of new credits, including debt service evaluations and collateral guidelines. Collateral guidelines vary with the creditworthiness of the borrower, but generally require loan-to-value ratios not to exceed 85% for commercial real estate, 80% for construction, 75% for development, 65% for raw land, and 90% for residential real estate. Commercial non-real estate, financial and agricultural loans are generally collateralized by business inventory, accounts receivables or new business equipment and are financed at 50%, 80% and 90% of estimated value, respectively. Installment and consumer loan collateral, where required, is based on 90% or lower loan-to-value ratios. Collateral values referenced above are monitored and estimated by loan officers and the senior credit administration function through inspections, independent appraisals, reference to broad measures of market values, and current experience with similar properties or collateral. Loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80% have potentially higher risks which are offset by other factors including the borrowers or guarantors creditworthiness, deposits and other aspects of the overall relationship, the customers history with Colonial, and any other potential sources of repayment.
41
Concentration
A significant portion of BancGroups loans are secured by real estate with commercial real estate and construction loans representing 27.7% and 40.9% of total loans as of December 31, 2006, respectively. BancGroups commercial real estate and construction loans are spread geographically throughout Alabama, Florida and other areas including metropolitan Atlanta, Dallas, Reno and Las Vegas with no more than 12.0% of total commercial real estate and construction loans in any one metropolitan statistical area (MSA). The Alabama economy generally experiences a slow but steady rate of growth, while BancGroups markets in Florida, Georgia, Nevada and Texas have experienced higher rates of growth. The collateral held in the commercial real estate and construction portfolios consists of various property types such as retail properties, 1-4 family residential developments and lots, office buildings, land held for future development or construction, residential homes under construction, multi-family housing, condominium properties, warehouses, lodging and health service facilities. The relatively small average loan size and the application of conservative underwriting guidelines further reduce risk. For the year ended 2006, the commercial real estate portfolio had net recoveries of $1.6 million. Net charge-offs to average loans for the construction portfolio were 0.09% for 2006. In addition to mortgages on the subject properties, substantially all construction and commercial real estate loans have personal guarantees of the principals involved. The owner-occupied commercial real estate portfolio represented 28.0% of the total commercial real estate portfolio outstanding at December 31, 2006. Owner-occupied real estate is primarily dependent on cash flows from operating businesses rather than on the sale or rental of the property; therefore, these loans generally carry less risk than other commercial real estate loans.
Management believes that its existing diversity of commercial real estate and construction loans reduces BancGroups risk exposure. The current distribution remains diverse in location, size, and collateral function. This diversification, in addition to Colonials emphasis on quality underwriting, serves to reduce the risk of losses. The following charts reflect the geographic diversity and property type distribution of construction and commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2006.
42
Construction | % of Category |
Commercial Real Estate |
% of Category |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Average Loan Size |
$ | 829 | $ | 646 | ||||||||
Geographic Diversity (by property location)(1) |
||||||||||||
Florida |
$ | 3,349,052 | 52.8 | % | $ | 2,498,915 | 58.2 | % | ||||
Alabama |
701,446 | 11.1 | % | 685,100 | 16.0 | % | ||||||
Georgia |
630,095 | 9.9 | % | 383,998 | 8.9 | % | ||||||
Texas |
833,412 | 13.1 | % | 220,391 | 5.1 | % | ||||||
Nevada |
431,443 | 6.8 | % | 231,402 | 5.4 | % | ||||||
Other |
394,876 | 6.3 | % | 272,173 | 6.4 | % | ||||||
Total |
$ | 6,340,324 | 100.0 | % | $ | 4,291,979 | 100.0 | % | ||||
% of Property Type Distribution to |
% of Property Type Distribution to |
|||||||||||||
Construction Portfolio |
Total Portfolio |
Commercial Real Estate Portfolio |
Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||
Residential Development and Lots |
28.0 | % | 11.5 | % | Retail |
25.4 | % | 7.0 | % | |||||
Land Only |
24.2 | % | 9.9 | % | Office |
21.5 | % | 6.0 | % | |||||
Residential Home Construction |
16.1 | % | 6.6 | % | Warehouse |
14.4 | % | 4.0 | % | |||||
Condominium |
7.2 | % | 2.9 | % | Multi-Family |
8.3 | % | 2.3 | % | |||||
Commercial Development |
6.2 | % | 2.5 | % | Healthcare |
6.8 | % | 1.9 | % | |||||
Retail |
6.1 | % | 2.5 | % | Lodging |
6.5 | % | 1.8 | % | |||||
Office |
3.7 | % | 1.5 | % | Church or School |
4.6 | % | 1.3 | % | |||||
Multi-Family |
3.1 | % | 1.3 | % | Industrial |
2.0 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||
Warehouse |
1.5 | % | 0.6 | % | Farm |
1.8 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||
Other(2) |
3.9 | % | 1.6 | % | Recreation |
1.1 | % | 0.3 | % | |||||
Other(2) |
7.6 | % | 2.1 | % | ||||||||||
Total Construction |
100.0 | % | 40.9 | % | Total Commercial Real Estate |
100.0 | % | 27.7 | % | |||||
(1) | As noted in the narrative discussion on Concentration, no more than 12.0% of construction or commercial real estate loans are in any one MSA. |
(2) | Other includes all loans in categories smaller than the lowest percentage shown above. |
Selected Characteristics of the 75 Largest Construction and Commercial Real Estate Loans
Construction | Commercial Real Estate |
|||||||
75 Largest Loans Total (in thousands) |
$ | 1,321,724 | $ | 736,545 | ||||
% of 75 largest loans to category total |
20.8 | % | 17.2 | % | ||||
Average Loan-to-Value Ratio (75 largest loans) |
62.9 | % | 67.4 | % | ||||
Average Debt Coverage Ratio (75 largest loans) |
N/A | 1.41x |
Residential real estate loans represent 19.3% of total loans in 2006. The majority of these loans are adjustable rate first mortgages on single-family, owner-occupied properties, and therefore, have generally less credit risk than other portfolio segments. BancGroup has a history of successfully lending in the residential real estate market and its quality ratios remain favorable in this portfolio segment. Net charge-offs to average loans for the residential real estate portfolio were 0.04% for 2006.
Loans classified as commercial, financial, and agricultural, representing 7.5% of total loans, consist of secured and unsecured credit lines and equipment loans for various industrial, agricultural, commercial, financial, retail, or service businesses. The risks associated with loans in this category are generally related to the earnings capacity of, and the cash flows generated from, the individual business activities of the borrowers.
43
Consumer loans, representing 1.5% of total loans, are loans to individuals for various purposes. Vehicle loans and unsecured loans make up the majority of these loans. The principal source of repayment is the earning capacity of the individual borrower, as well as the value of the collateral for secured loans.
BancGroup maintains a mortgage warehouse lending division. This department provides lines of credit collateralized by residential mortgage loans and other services to mortgage origination companies. Warehouse loans outstanding at December 31, 2006 were $281.7 million, with unfunded commitments of $920.4 million.
The Company has 48 credits with commitments (funded and unfunded) of $949 million that fall within the bank regulatory definition of a Shared National Credit (generally defined as a total loan commitment in excess of $20 million that is shared by three or more lenders). The largest outstanding amount to any single borrower is $43 million (which is a mortgage warehouse lending credit). At December 31, 2006, $445 million of these commitments were funded.
Although by definition these commitments are considered Shared National Credits, BancGroups loan officers have established long-term relationships with each of these borrowers. These commitments are comprised of the following:
| 55% 36 commercial real estate credit facilities to companies with headquarters located within Colonials existing markets, |
| 43% mortgage warehouse lines to 10 large institutions, and |
| 2% 2 operating facilities to a large national insurance company and a healthcare provider. |
Management believes that these are sound participations involving credits that fit within Colonials lending philosophy and meet its conservative underwriting guidelines.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Colonial, through its lending and credit functions, continuously reviews its loan portfolio for credit risk. Colonial employs an independent credit review area that reviews the lending and credit functions to validate that credit risks are appropriately identified. The Company remains committed to the early recognition of problem loans and to ensuring an adequate level of allowance to cover losses. At December 31, 2006, the Companys total allowance was $174.9 million, which represented 1.13% of period-end loans.
Using input from the Companys comprehensive credit risk identification process, the Companys credit risk management area analyzes and validates the Companys loan loss reserve methodology at least quarterly. The analysis includes three basic components: specific allowances for individual loans, general allowances for loan pools, and allowances based on identified economic conditions and other risk factors. The credit risk management area, along with senior management, review the methodology and ensure it is appropriate and that all material risk elements have been assessed in order to determine the appropriate level of allowance for the inherent losses in the loan portfolio at each quarter end. In addition, the allowance methodology is discussed with and reviewed quarterly by the Audit Committee.
The first component of the allowance for loan losses analysis involves the calculation of specific allowances for individual impaired loans as required by SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. In addition, the Company requires that a broad group of loans be tested for impairment each quarter (this includes all loans of $500,000 and over that have internal risk ratings below a predetermined classification level, plus all significantly past due loans of $200,000 and over). The credit risk management area validates all impairment testing and validates the reserve allocations for all identified impaired loans each quarter. Reserves associated with this element are based on a thorough analysis of the most probable source of repayment which is normally the liquidation of collateral, but may also include discounted future cash flows or the market value of the loan
44
itself. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the specific allowance calculations for this element of the allowance totaled $2.3 million and $3.5 million, respectively. The decrease in the reserve between these two periods primarily resulted from a 55.3% decline in the dollar amount of loans that met the criteria for impaired status.
The second reserve component is the general allowance for loan pools assessed by applying loss factors to groups of loans within the portfolio that have similar characteristics. This part of the methodology is governed by SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies. The general allowance factors are based upon recent and historical charge-off experience and are typically applied to the portfolio by loan type and internal risk rating. Historical loss analyses provide the basis for factors used for homogenous pools of smaller loans, such as residential real estate and other consumer loan categories which are not evaluated based on individual risk ratings but almost entirely based on historical losses. The statistics used in the analysis of this second reserve component are adjusted quarterly based on loss trends and risk rating migrations. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the general allowance calculations totaled $133.2 million and $124.6 million, respectively. The increase between the periods was primarily the result of portfolio growth which was partially offset by lower criticized and classified risk assets.
The third component of the allowance represents the effect of risks or losses that are not fully captured elsewhere, and includes amounts for new loan products or portfolio segments which are deemed to have risks not included in the other model elements, macroeconomic factors and model imprecision. The Company analyzes and revises this part of the allowance at least quarterly. The qualitative risk factors of this third allowance segment are subjective and require a high degree of management judgment. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the allowance calculated for economic conditions and other risk factors relating to specific loan categories totaled $27.5 million and $29.0 million, respectively. During 2006, the component of the reserve that covers the risks associated with Colonials concentration in construction and commercial real estate loans was modified and expanded. Changes included adding all property types in the analysis as well as adding factors for granularity and differential risks. The effect of this modification was offset by the full integration of the loan portfolio from a previous acquisition and reduced risk levels from two segregated portfolio segments. In addition to the allocated portions, an amount is calculated to adjust the allowance for imprecision inherent in estimates used for the allocated portions of the reserve. The unallocated allowance is the result of managements judgment of risks inherent in the portfolio, economic uncertainties and other subjective factors, including industry trends. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the unallocated allowance was $11.8 million and $13.9 million, respectively.
Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Percent of Loans to Total Loans |
Amount | Percent of Loans to Total Loans |
Amount | Percent of Loans to Total Loans |
Amount | Percent of Loans to Total Loans |
Amount | Percent of Loans to Total Loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period applicable to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, agricultural |
$ | 40,642 | 7.5 | % | $ | 41,365 | 7.4 | % | $ | 44,621 | 7.8 | % | $ | 50,314 | 8.5 | % | $ | 51,468 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
26,820 | 27.7 | % | 40,311 | 29.7 | % | 37,393 | 33.2 | % | 28,800 | 35.7 | % | 25,175 | 32.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Real estate construction |
64,487 | 40.9 | % | 41,826 | 36.8 | % | 30,357 | 30.5 | % | 25,014 | 26.5 | % | 26,707 | 23.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
18,337 | 19.3 | % | 20,734 | 20.4 | % | 12,494 | 17.3 | % | 11,176 | 17.1 | % | 11,058 | 16.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Consumer and other |
11,265 | 2.8 | % | 10,030 | 2.5 | % | 9,075 | 2.5 | % | 9,651 | 3.7 | % | 9,051 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
1,506 | 1.8 | % | 2,879 | 3.2 | % | 2,783 | 8.7 | % | 2,683 | 8.5 | % | 4,439 | 14.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Unallocated |
11,793 | 0.0 | % | 13,906 | 0.0 | % | 12,079 | 0.0 | % | 10,911 | 0.0 | % | 7,367 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 174,850 | 100.0 | % | $ | 171,051 | 100.0 | % | $ | 148,802 | 100.0 | % | $ | 138,549 | 100.0 | % | $ | 135,265 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
45
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses January 1 |
$ | 171,051 | $ | 148,802 | $ | 138,549 | $ | 135,265 | $ | 122,200 | ||||||||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, agricultural |
17,346 | 8,452 | 10,854 | 21,370 | 19,859 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
1,537 | 8,860 | 8,034 | 9,344 | 4,062 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate construction |
5,690 | 2,445 | 2,670 | 1,528 | 1,789 | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
1,702 | 3,155 | 2,613 | 5,297 | 5,221 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer and other |
4,504 | 4,294 | 5,640 | 3,888 | 4,703 | |||||||||||||||
Total charge-offs |
30,779 | 27,206 | 29,811 | 41,427 | 35,634 | |||||||||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, agricultural |
5,914 | 3,546 | 2,855 | 2,052 | 1,189 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
3,175 | 1,171 | 776 | 874 | 1,005 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate construction |
571 | 254 | 223 | 197 | 93 | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
428 | 584 | 480 | 332 | 565 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer and other |
2,348 | 2,440 | 1,879 | 2,501 | 2,033 | |||||||||||||||
Total recoveries |
12,436 | 7,995 | 6,213 | 5,956 | 4,885 | |||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
18,343 | 19,211 | 23,598 | 35,471 | 30,749 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for loan loss |
22,142 | 26,838 | 26,994 | 37,378 | 35,980 | |||||||||||||||
Allowance added from bank acquisitions |
| 14,622 | 6,857 | 1,377 | 7,834 | |||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses December 31 |
$ | 174,850 | $ | 171,051 | $ | 148,802 | $ | 138,549 | $ | 135,265 | ||||||||||
Loans (net of unearned income) December 31 |
$ | 15,478,889 | $ | 14,899,864 | $ | 12,857,811 | $ | 11,588,895 | $ | 11,692,430 | ||||||||||
Ratio of ending allowance to ending loans (net of unearned income) |
1.13 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.16 | % | ||||||||||
Average loans (net of unearned income) |
$ | 15,339,699 | $ | 14,139,380 | $ | 12,148,513 | $ | 11,550,930 | $ | 10,520,771 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans (net of unearned income) |
0.12 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.29 | % |
Nonperforming Assets
BancGroup classifies problem loans into four categories: nonaccrual, past due, renegotiated and other potential problems. When management determines that a loan no longer meets the criteria for a performing loan and collection of interest appears doubtful, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual if full collection of principal and interest becomes unlikely (even if all payments are current) or if the loan is delinquent in principal or interest payments for 90 days or more, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. BancGroups policy is to charge off consumer installment loans 120 days past due unless they are in the process of foreclosure and are adequately collateralized. Management closely monitors all loans that are contractually 90 days past due, renegotiated or nonaccrual. These loans are summarized as follows:
46
Nonperforming Assets
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Aggregate loans for which interest is not being accrued |
$ | 14,025 | $ | 25,668 | $ | 26,983 | $ | 57,342 | $ | 70,282 | ||||||||||
Aggregate loans renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of interest or principal because of deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower |
| 155 | 191 | 277 | 417 | |||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming loans* |
14,025 | 25,823 | 27,174 | 57,619 | 70,699 | |||||||||||||||
Other real estate and in-substance foreclosure |
1,850 | 6,032 | 9,711 | 17,378 | 20,468 | |||||||||||||||
Repossessions |
19 | 76 | 154 | 443 | 134 | |||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
9,255 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets* |
$ | 25,149 | $ | 31,931 | $ | 37,039 | $ | 75,440 | $ | 91,301 | ||||||||||
Aggregate loans contractually past due 90 days or more for which interest is being accrued |
$ | 8,138 | $ | 10,283 | $ | 8,096 | $ | 10,802 | $ | 21,693 | ||||||||||
Total nonperforming loans as a percent of net loans |
0.09 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.60 | % | ||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets as a percent of net loans, other real estate and repossessions |
0.16 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.78 | % | ||||||||||
Total nonperforming loans and 90 day past due loans for which interest is being accrued as a percent of net loans |
0.14 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.79 | % | ||||||||||
Allowance for loan loss as a percent of nonperforming loans (nonaccrual and renegotiated) |
1247 | % | 662 | % | 548 | % | 240 | % | 191 | % |
* | Total does not include loans contractually past due 90 days or more, which are still accruing interest |
During 2006, BancGroup transferred nonperforming loans with a net book value of $9.3 million to loans held for sale. Prior to the transfer to held for sale, BancGroup charged down the loans to fair value. The loans were subsequently sold in January 2007.
The above nonperforming loans represent all material credits for which management has significant doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the loan repayment terms. Management also expects that the resolution of these problem credits as well as other performing loans will not materially impact future operating results, liquidity or capital resources. The balance of nonperforming assets declined $6.8 million, or 21%, during the year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of the resolution of problem assets through payoffs, the sale of underlying property, charge-offs, and sale of the loans. The balance of nonperforming assets can fluctuate due to changes in economic conditions, nonperforming assets obtained in acquisitions, and the disproportionate impact of larger assets. Historically, Colonial has experienced favorable levels of nonperforming assets. The recent improvements in nonperforming assets and other credit quality measures are the result of additional improvements in collection, work-out and risk management efforts.
Interest income recognized and interest income foregone on nonaccrual loans were not significant for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002.
A loan is considered impaired, based on current information and events, if it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. As mentioned previously, Colonials credit risk management area performs detailed verification and testing to ensure appropriate identification of impaired loans and that proper reserves are held on these loans. The recorded investment in impaired loans at December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $9.9 million and $22.1 million, respectively, and these loans had a corresponding valuation allowance of $2.3 million and $3.5 million, respectively. The average investment in impaired loans during 2006 and 2005 totaled $18.1 million and $22.8 million, respectively. The decrease in impaired loans is primarily due to the resolution of several problem credits.
47
Management, through its loan officers, internal credit review staff and external examinations by regulatory agencies, has identified approximately $158.0 million of loans which have been placed on a classified loan list excluding nonaccrual, other real estate, repossessions and loans that are contractually 90 days past due at December 31, 2006. The status of all material classified loans is reviewed at least monthly by loan officers and quarterly by BancGroups centralized credit administration function. In connection with such reviews, collateral values are updated where considered necessary. If collateral values are judged insufficient or other sources of repayment are deemed inadequate, the amount of reserve held is increased or the loan is charged down to estimated recoverable amounts. As of December 31, 2006, substantially all of these classified loans were current with their existing repayment terms. Management believes that classification of such loans well in advance of their reaching a delinquent status allows the Company the greatest flexibility in correcting problems and providing adequate reserves. Given the reserves and the demonstrated ability of the borrowers to comply with the existing repayment terms, management believes any exposure from these loans has been adequately addressed at the present time.
Asset/Liability Management
Asset/liability management involves the evaluation, monitoring and management of interest rate risk, liquidity and funding. The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for Colonials asset/liability management policies. To ensure adherence to these policies, the Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO) of the Board of Directors establishes and monitors guidelines to control the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates. The guidelines apply to both on and off-balance sheet positions. The goal of the ALCO process is to maximize earnings while carefully controlling interest rate risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk, and its potential effects on earnings, are inherent in the operations of a financial institution. BancGroup is subject to interest rate risk because:
| Assets and liabilities may mature or re-price at different times (for example, if assets re-price faster than liabilities and interest rates are generally falling, earnings will initially decline); |
| Assets and liabilities may re-price at the same time but by different amounts (for example, when the general level of interest rates is falling, Colonial Bank may reduce rates paid on checking and savings deposit accounts by an amount that is less than the general decline in market interest rates); |
| Short-term and long-term market interest rates may change by different amounts (i.e., the shape of the yield curve may affect new loan yields and funding costs differently); or |
| The remaining maturity of various assets or liabilities may shorten or lengthen as interest rates change (for example, if long-term mortgage interest rates decline sharply, mortgage-backed securities held in the securities available for sale portfolio may prepay significantly earlier than anticipated which could reduce portfolio income). In addition, interest rates may have an indirect impact on loan demand, credit losses, mortgage origination volume, the value of the pension liability and other sources of earnings. |
Asset/liability management activities include lending, accepting and placing deposits, investing in securities, issuing debt and hedging interest rate risk. Sensitivity of earnings to interest rate changes arises when yields on assets change in a different time period or in a different amount from that of interest cost on liabilities. To mitigate interest rate risk, the structure of the balance sheet is managed so that movements of interest rates on assets and liabilities are highly correlated in a manner intended to allow Colonials interest bearing assets and liabilities to contribute to earnings even in periods of volatile interest rates.
Colonial employs the following measurement techniques in the management of interest rate risk: simulation of earnings and simulation of the economic value of equity. These techniques are complementary and are used in concert to provide a comprehensive interest rate risk management capability.
48
Simulation of earnings is the primary tool used to measure the sensitivity of earnings to interest rate changes. Using computer modeling techniques, Colonial is able to measure the potential impact of different interest rate assumptions on pre-tax earnings. All balance sheet positions, including derivative financial instruments, are included in the model simulation.
The following table represents the output from the Companys simulation model based on the balance sheet at December 31, 2006 with comparable prior year information. The table measures, consistently for both years, the impact on net interest income of an immediate and sustained change in all market interest rates in 100 basis point increments for the 12 calendar months following the date of the change. This twelve-month projection of net interest income under these scenarios is compared to the twelve-month net interest income projection with rates unchanged.
As shown in the tables, the Companys balance sheet became less asset sensitive from December 31, 2005. On the asset side, a decrease in the proportion of variable rate loans from 76% of total loans in 2005 to 73% in 2006 decreased asset sensitivity. On the liability side, the liabilities have become more sensitive to changes in rates due to the shortening of duration of the certificate of deposit portfolio coupled with the customers migration from low and no cost transaction accounts to higher cost accounts with more pricing sensitivity.
Basis Points Change |
Fed Funds Rate | Percentage Change in 12 Month Projected Net Interest Income Versus Projected Net Interest Income Under No Rate Change(1) |
||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
+200 |
7.25 | 6.25 | 1.4 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||
+100 |
6.25 | 5.25 | 0.6 | % | 2.2 | % | ||||
No rate change |
5.25 | 4.25 | | | ||||||
100 |
4.25 | 3.25 | (0.3 | )% | (1.7 | )% | ||||
200 |
3.25 | 2.25 | (1.8 | )% | (3.5 | )% |
(1) | The computation of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, estimates of rates on loans and deposits given these rate changes, the ability to maintain interest rate floors on loans as market rates decline, deposit decay rates and loan/investment prepayments. Further, the computations do not take into account changes to the slope of the yield curve, changes in the relative relationship of various market rates, changes in the volume or mix of asset and liabilities on the balance sheet nor do they contemplate any actions BancGroup could undertake in response to changes in interest rates. |
Colonial also measures interest rate risk by simulating the impact of changes in interest rates to the market value of equity. The potential effect of these interest rate changes is derived from the impact of such changes on the market value of assets and liabilities. Colonial analyzes the changes in market value of equity to ensure that the Company maintains an adequate capital position.
49
The following table represents the output of the simulation model for the economic value of equity (EVE), which is defined as the net present value of interest rate sensitive assets, interest rate sensitive liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. The table represents the percentage change in the EVE under 100 basis point parallel rate shocks versus the EVE assuming rates at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Basis Points Change |
Fed Funds Rates | Percentage No Rate |
||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
+200 |
7.25 | 6.25 | (3.2 | )% | 2.2 | % | ||||
+100 |
6.25 | 5.25 | (0.7 | )% | 1.9 | % | ||||
No rate change |
5.25 | 4.25 | | | ||||||
100 |
4.25 | 3.25 | (2.3 | )% | (2.2 | )% | ||||
200 |
3.25 | 2.25 | (10.9 | )% | (8.3 | )% |
Liquidity and Funding
Liquidity is the ability of an organization to meet its financial commitments and obligations on a timely basis. These commitments and obligations include credit needs of customers, withdrawals by depositors, repayment of debt when due and payment of operating expenses and dividends. Management of liquidity also includes management of funding sources and their utilization based on current, future and contingency needs. Maintaining and managing adequate liquidity and funding are other prominent focuses of ALCO.
Deposit growth is a primary focus of BancGroups funding and liquidity strategy. Average deposits increased by $1.8 billion, or 13% over 2005. With branches in three of the top four population growth states, retail deposits are a major component of BancGroups funding growth.
BancGroup has worked to expand the availability of short-term and long-term wholesale funding sources in addition to the emphasis on core deposit growth. The Company draws on a variety of funding sources to assist in funding loan growth, securities acquisitions and deposit fluctuations. Fed Funds lines and repurchase agreements are sources for short-term borrowings. Availability from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) is also an important part of BancGroups wholesale funding sources. As of December 31, 2006, the lendable collateral value pledged to the FHLB amounted to $3.2 billion down from $3.4 billion in the prior year. The FHLB will continue to provide an important source of wholesale liquidity. From time to time BancGroup has issued subordinated debentures, subordinated notes and junior subordinated debt to provide both capital and funding.
Over the course of 2006, BancGroup continued to focus on the growth of retail deposits and brokered certificates of deposit to curtail short-term borrowings and to match the short-term funding requirement of mortgage warehouse lending cycles.
Short-term borrowings were comprised of the following at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
FHLB borrowings |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,250,000 | |||
Federal funds purchased |
1,133,000 | 673,925 | 1,217,808 | ||||||
Repurchase agreements (retail) |
532,672 | 568,871 | 360,127 | ||||||
Repurchase agreements (wholesale) |
300,000 | 300,000 | 431,000 | ||||||
Total Short-Term Borrowings |
$ | 1,965,672 | $ | 1,542,796 | $ | 3,258,935 | |||
50
Additional details regarding short-term borrowings are shown below:
Maximum Outstanding At Any Month End |
Average Balance |
Average Interest Rate |
Average Interest Rate At December 31 |
|||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
2006 |
||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings |
$ | 250,000 | $ | 39,315 | 5.42 | % | | |||||
Federal funds purchased |
1,628,400 | 1,079,743 | 5.12 | % | 5.24 | % | ||||||
Other short-term borrowings |
948,327 | 867,645 | 4.30 | % | 4.51 | % | ||||||
$ | 2,826,727 | $ | 1,986,703 | 4.77 | % | 4.93 | % | |||||
2005 |
||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings |
$ | 1,250,000 | $ | 503,989 | 2.95 | % | | |||||
Federal funds purchased |
1,612,000 | 1,236,153 | 3.20 | % | 4.20 | % | ||||||
Other short-term borrowings |
1,030,065 | 899,200 | 2.34 | % | 3.43 | % | ||||||
$ | 3,892,065 | $ | 2,639,342 | 2.86 | % | 3.76 | % | |||||
2004 |
||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings |
$ | 1,250,000 | $ | 812,702 | 1.58 | % | 2.44 | % | ||||
Federal funds purchased |
1,402,178 | 1,220,059 | 1.39 | % | 2.27 | % | ||||||
Other short-term borrowings |
934,134 | 873,274 | 0.98 | % | 1.73 | % | ||||||
$ | 3,586,312 | $ | 2,906,035 | 1.32 | % | 2.20 | % | |||||
Long-term borrowings were comprised of the following at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Variable rate subordinated debentures |
$ | 7,725 | $ | 7,725 | $ | 7,725 | |||
Subordinated notes(1) |
376,114 | 383,622 | 265,873 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debentures |
299,078 | 307,446 | 302,412 | ||||||
FHLB borrowings(1) |
1,835,229 | 1,634,989 | 1,382,913 | ||||||
Repurchase agreements (wholesale) |
| | 300,000 | ||||||
Other |
4,128 | 5,049 | 2,034 | ||||||
Total Long-Term Borrowings |
$ | 2,522,274 | $ | 2,338,831 | $ | 2,260,957 | |||
(1) | Includes an adjustment to fair market value as required by SFAS 133, due to related interest rate swaps. See Note 9, Derivatives, and Note 14, Long-Term Borrowings, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details. |
Operational Risk Management
In providing banking services, Colonial processes cash, checks, wires and ACH transactions which expose Colonial to operational risk. Controls over such processing activities are closely monitored to safeguard the assets of Colonial and its customers. However, from time to time, Colonial has incurred losses related to these processes and there can be no assurance that such losses will not occur in the future.
Operational risk is the risk of unexpected losses attributable to human error, systems failures, fraud, or inadequate internal controls and procedures. This risk is mitigated through a system of internal controls that are designed to keep operational risk at levels appropriate to Colonials corporate standards in view of the risks inherent in the markets in which Colonial operates. The system of internal controls includes policies and procedures that require the proper authorization, approval, documentation and monitoring of transactions. Each business unit is responsible for complying with corporate policies and procedures to do so. Colonials internal auditors monitor the overall effectiveness of the system of internal controls on an ongoing basis.
51
Colonial does not engage in business processes that are out of its primary areas of expertise but rather outsources non-core processing functions to limit operational risk associated with non-core activities.
Operational losses are monitored closely. Operational losses have historically been absorbed by current earnings without any material impact to earnings or capital.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Capital Adequacy
Management is committed to maintaining capital at a level sufficient to protect shareholders and depositors, provide for reasonable growth and fully comply with all regulatory requirements. Managements strategy to achieve these goals is to retain sufficient earnings while providing a reasonable return to shareholders in the form of dividends and return on equity. The Companys dividend payout ratio target range is 35-45%. Dividend rates are determined by the Board of Directors in consideration of several factors including current and projected capital ratios, liquidity and income levels and other bank dividend yields and payment ratios.
The amount of a cash dividend, if any, rests with the discretion of the Board of Directors of BancGroup as well as upon applicable statutory constraints such as the Delaware law requirement that dividends may be paid only out of capital surplus and net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and the preceding fiscal year.
BancGroup also has access to equity capital markets through both public and private issuances. Management considers these sources and related return in addition to internally generated capital in evaluating future expansion or acquisition opportunities.
The Federal Reserve Board has issued guidelines identifying minimum Tier I leverage ratios relative to total assets and minimum capital ratios relative to risk-adjusted assets. The minimum leverage ratio required for BancGroup is 4%. The minimum risk adjusted capital ratios established by the Federal Reserve are 4% for Tier I and 8% for total capital. Higher capital ratios may be required by the Federal Reserve if warranted by the circumstance or risk profile. BancGroups actual capital ratios and the components of capital and risk adjusted asset information (subject to regulatory review) are stated below:
December 31, | ||||||||
2006 |
2005 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Risk-Based Capital: |
||||||||
Shareholders equity |
$ | 2,057,335 | $ | 1,932,691 | ||||
Unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale |
35,076 | 37,856 | ||||||
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedging instruments |
9,084 | 8,739 | ||||||
Qualifying trust preferred securities |
290,000 | 298,000 | ||||||
Intangible assets (net of allowed deferred taxes) |
(664,164 | ) | (681,907 | ) | ||||
Other adjustments |
(3,191 | ) | (2,968 | ) | ||||
Tier I Capital |
1,724,140 | 1,592,411 | ||||||
Allowable loan loss reserve |
176,100 | 171,051 | ||||||
Subordinated debt |
331,850 | 355,533 | ||||||
45% of net unrealized gains on equity securities available-for-sale |
523 | 535 | ||||||
Tier II Capital |
508,473 | 527,119 | ||||||
Total Capital |
$ | 2,232,613 | $ | 2,119,530 | ||||
Risk-Adjusted Assets |
$ | 18,960,865 | $ | 17,412,622 | ||||
Quarterly Average Assets (for regulatory purposes) |
$ | 22,083,202 | $ | 20,504,737 | ||||
Tier I Leverage Ratio |
7.81 | % | 7.77 | % | ||||
Risk-Adjusted Capital Ratios: |
||||||||
Tier I Capital Ratio |
9.09 | % | 9.15 | % | ||||
Total Capital Ratio |
11.77 | % | 12.17 | % |
52
Regulatory Restrictions
As noted previously, dividends payable by national banks in any year, without prior approval of the appropriate regulatory authorities, are limited.
Colonial Bank is also required to maintain reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank based on a percentage of deposits reduced by its cash on hand. The average amount of those reserves was approximately $3.5 million and $8.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Recent Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which establishes a two-step process for recognizing and measuring tax benefits. It applies to all tax positions within the scope of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under FIN 48, tax benefits can only be recognized in the financial statements if it is more likely than not that they would be sustained after full review by the relevant taxing authority. If a tax position meets the recognition threshold, the benefit to be recorded is equal to the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. Any difference between the full amount of the tax benefit and the amount recorded in the financial statements will be recognized as higher tax expense. Required disclosures will include a tabular rollforward of the beginning and ending aggregate unrecognized tax benefits as well as specific detail related to tax uncertainties for which it is reasonably possible the amount of unrecognized tax benefit will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months.
FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 will be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The changes required by FIN 48 are not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. Prior to SFAS 157, there were different definitions of fair value and limited guidance for applying those definitions. Moreover, that guidance was dispersed among the many accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 provides a single definition of fair value, together with a framework for measuring it, and requires additional disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The Statement does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances.
SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The provisions of the Statement will be applied prospectively as of the effective date, except in limited circumstances in which the provisions will be applied retrospectively to certain securities and financial instruments as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact SFAS 157 will have on the financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. SFAS 158 requires companies to fully recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of defined benefit pension plans as assets or liabilities, respectively. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plans assets and the projected benefit obligation. In addition, SFAS 158 requires companies to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of year-end. Currently, companies are permitted to choose a measurement date up to three months prior to year-end. The provision to require recognition of the funded status of the plan is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The provision to require measurement of assets and obligations at year-end will be effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The measurement date utilized by BancGroup for its pension plan is the Companys year end. On December 31, 2005, BancGroup closed its pension plan to new employees and set the compensation amount and years of service for the future benefits calculation for participants. As a result of adopting SFAS 158 on December 31, 2006, BancGroup recognized an increase of $641,000 to the balance of its pension asset.
53
In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a final consensus on Issue 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. EITF 06-4 stipulates that an agreement by the employer to share a portion of the proceeds of a life insurance policy with the employee during the postretirement period is a postretirement benefit arrangement for which a liability must be recorded. The consensus is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. Entities will have the option of applying the provisions of EITF 06-4 as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings or retrospectively to all prior periods. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact EITF 06-4 will have on the financial statements.
In September 2006, the EITF reached a final consensus on Issue 06-5, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance. EITF 06-5 stipulates that the cash surrender value and any additional amounts provided by the contractual terms of the insurance policy that are realizable at the balance sheet date should be considered in determining the amount that could be realized under FTB 85-4, and any amounts that are not immediately payable to the policyholder in cash should be discounted to their present value. Also, in determining the amount that could be realized, companies should assume that policies will be surrendered on an individual-by-individual basis, rather than surrendering the entire group policy. The consensus is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Entities will have the option of applying the provisions of EITF 06-5 as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings or retrospectively to all prior periods. Colonial will apply the provisions as a cumulative effect adjustment. As a result of adopting EITF 06-5 on January 1, 2007, BancGroup will recognize a decrease of $540,000 to the balance of bank-owned life insurance.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which permits companies to elect to measure certain eligible items at fair value. Subsequent unrealized gains and losses on those items will be reported in earnings. Upfront costs and fees related to those items will be reported in earnings as incurred and not deferred.
SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. If a company elects to apply the provisions of the Statement to eligible items existing at that date, the effect of the remeasurement to fair value will be reported as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Retrospective application will not be permitted. The Company is currently assessing whether it will elect to use the fair value option for any of its eligible items.
COMPARISON OF 2005 WITH 2004
Colonial recorded earnings per diluted share of $1.52 for the year ended 2005, a 16% increase over 2004. The Company also reported net income of $229 million for the year ended 2005, a 32% increase over 2004.
Net interest income for the year increased 25% over 2004 primarily due to strong growth in average earning assets and a 23 basis point expansion in net interest margin. The net interest margin increased to 3.75% in 2005 compared to 3.52% in 2004.
Noninterest income for the year ended 2005 was $176 million, an increase of $23 million, or 15%, over 2004. The increase was primarily from increases in mortgage warehouse fees of $14.8 million, retail banking fees of $5.3 million and mortgage banking income of $3.8 million. As discussed in the Divestitures section of Managements Discussion and Analysis, during 2005 the Company sold 17 branches in northwest Alabama and three in southern Tennessee in an effort to redeploy those resources into markets with more growth potential. BancGroup recognized a gain of $37.0 million on the branches sold. This gain was offset by losses from the sale of securities of $24.7 million and the change in fair value of swap derivatives of $12.1 million.
54
Noninterest expense for the year ended 2005 was $515 million, an increase of $84 million, or 19%, over 2004. The 2005 noninterest expense included $9.6 million in net losses related to the early extinguishment of debt, a $2.2 million increase over the $7.4 million recorded in 2004. The remaining increases in noninterest expense were primarily due to the addition of 42 new locations, including 33 through acquisitions, during 2005. These new locations and acquisition related expenses accounted for approximately $27 million, or 32% of the total increase in noninterest expense. The remaining increases included additional expenses from salaries and benefits, occupancy expenses, amortization of intangibles and professional fees.
The effective income tax rate was 33.4% in 2005 and 34.0% in 2004. BancGroup is subject to a statutory federal rate of 35% and various state tax rates.
Colonials credit quality remained excellent. Nonperforming assets decreased 14% to $32 million at December 31, 2005, resulting in a nonperforming assets ratio of 0.21%. Net charge-offs as a percent of average net loans for 2005 were 0.14%. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of net loans at December 31, 2005, was 1.15% compared to 1.16% at December 31, 2004 as a result of improving credit quality trends.
The Companys total risk-based capital ratio at December 31, 2005 was 12.17% and its Tier I risk-based capital ratio was 9.15%, exceeding the minimum regulatory guidelines of 8% and 4%, respectively. The Companys total and Tier I risk-based capital ratios at December 31, 2004 were 11.39% and 8.80%, respectively. The Companys Tier I leverage ratios were 7.77% and 7.16% at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, exceeding the minimum regulatory guideline of 4% for the Company.
In 2005, the Company paid dividends of $89.7 million, or $0.61 per share, compared to $75.6 million or $0.58 per share in 2004.
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
This information is included in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
55
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
The financial statements and supplementary data required by Regulation S-X and by Item 302 of Regulation S-K are set forth in the pages listed below.
56
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Colonial BancGroup, Inc.:
We have completed integrated audits of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc.s consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated financial statements
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of BancGroups management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Internal control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that BancGroup maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, BancGroup maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. BancGroups management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on managements assessment and on the effectiveness of BancGroups internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
57
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Birmingham, Alabama
February 26, 2007
58
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 425,148 | $ | 429,549 | ||||
Interest bearing deposits in banks |
2,200 | 9,417 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
15,334 | 59,625 | ||||||
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
605,937 | 589,902 | ||||||
Securities available for sale |
3,083,614 | 2,841,404 | ||||||
Held to maturity securities (fair value: 2006, $2,007; 2005, $3,126) |
1,874 | 2,950 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
1,474,000 | 1,097,892 | ||||||
Total loans, net of unearned income: |
||||||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
281,693 | 483,701 | ||||||
Loans, excluding mortgage warehouse loans |
15,197,196 | 14,416,163 | ||||||
Less: |
||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(174,850 | ) | (171,051 | ) | ||||
Loans, net |
15,304,039 | 14,728,813 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
407,696 | 340,201 | ||||||
Goodwill |
627,207 | 635,413 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
47,126 | 59,599 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
1,869 | 6,108 | ||||||
Bank-owned life insurance |
457,812 | 345,842 | ||||||
Accrued interest and other assets |
330,393 | 279,482 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 22,784,249 | $ | 21,426,197 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest bearing transaction accounts |
$ | 2,869,845 | $ | 3,167,875 | ||||
Interest bearing transaction accounts |
6,222,818 | 5,845,068 | ||||||
Total transaction accounts |
9,092,663 | 9,012,943 | ||||||
Time deposits |
6,596,827 | 5,661,715 | ||||||
Brokered time deposits |
401,564 | 808,791 | ||||||
Total deposits |
16,091,054 | 15,483,449 | ||||||
Repurchase agreements |
832,672 | 868,871 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
1,133,000 | 673,925 | ||||||
Subordinated debt |
383,839 | 391,347 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debt |
299,078 | 307,446 | ||||||
Other long-term debt |
1,839,356 | 1,640,038 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
147,915 | 128,430 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
20,726,914 | 19,493,506 | ||||||
Contingencies and commitments (Note 7) |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $2.50 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized and none issued at both December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 |
| | ||||||
Preference stock, $2.50 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized and none issued at both December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $2.50 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized; 156,258,708 and 155,602,747 shares issued and 152,852,381 and 154,242,820 shares outstanding at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively |
390,647 | 389,007 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital |
763,845 | 759,704 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
1,029,510 | 868,515 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost (3,406,327 shares at December 31, 2006 and 1,359,927 shares at December 31, 2005) |
(82,506 | ) | (31,510 | ) | ||||
Unearned compensation |
| (6,430 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes |
(44,161 | ) | (46,595 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
2,057,335 | 1,932,691 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 22,784,249 | $ | 21,426,197 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
59
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||||
Interest Income: |
|||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 1,258,513 | $ | 978,893 | $ | 691,801 | |||||
Interest and dividends on securities: |
|||||||||||
Taxable |
141,918 | 145,668 | 144,301 | ||||||||
Nontaxable |
2,046 | 2,290 | 3,195 | ||||||||
Dividends |
8,498 | 6,841 | 5,278 | ||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold and other short-term investments |
44,610 | 28,363 | 3,442 | ||||||||
Total interest income |
1,455,585 | 1,162,055 | 848,017 | ||||||||
Interest Expense: |
|||||||||||
Interest on deposits |
469,289 | 273,533 | 148,135 | ||||||||
Interest on short-term borrowings |
94,791 | 75,395 | 38,303 | ||||||||
Interest on long-term debt |
136,238 | 103,905 | 94,331 | ||||||||
Total interest expense |
700,318 | 452,833 | 280,769 | ||||||||
Net Interest Income |
755,267 | 709,222 | 567,248 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
22,142 | 26,838 | 26,994 | ||||||||
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses |
733,125 | 682,384 | 540,254 | ||||||||
Noninterest Income: |
|||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
65,071 | 58,302 | 58,467 | ||||||||
Financial planning services |
14,054 | 13,211 | 13,370 | ||||||||
Electronic banking |
17,212 | 15,324 | 12,604 | ||||||||
Mortgage banking |
13,540 | 12,228 | 8,433 | ||||||||
Mortgage warehouse fees |
25,323 | 16,055 | 1,244 | ||||||||
Bank-owned life insurance |
15,954 | 13,942 | 10,261 | ||||||||
Goldleaf income |
1,171 | 10,163 | 7,610 | ||||||||
Net cash settlement of swap derivatives |
| 10,298 | 16,567 | ||||||||
Securities and derivatives gains (losses), net |
4,772 | (24,654 | ) | 7,544 | |||||||
Change in fair value of swap derivatives |
| (12,053 | ) | (393 | ) | ||||||
Gain on sale of Goldleaf |
2,829 | | | ||||||||
Gain on sale of branches |
| 37,020 | | ||||||||
Other income |
29,296 | 26,140 | 17,494 | ||||||||
Total noninterest income |
189,222 | 175,976 | 153,201 | ||||||||
Noninterest Expense: |
|||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
280,025 | 262,713 | 218,095 | ||||||||
Occupancy expense of bank premises, net |
67,338 | 62,666 | 53,167 | ||||||||
Furniture and equipment expenses |
48,585 | 43,653 | 38,300 | ||||||||
Professional services |
19,090 | 22,091 | 19,356 | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
12,209 | 11,528 | 6,364 | ||||||||
Advertising |
10,782 | 12,227 | 8,477 | ||||||||
Communications |
10,845 | 10,278 | 10,692 | ||||||||
Merger related expenses |
| 4,196 | 1,999 | ||||||||
Goldleaf expense |
1,025 | 9,195 | 6,953 | ||||||||
Net losses related to the early extinguishment of debt |
| 9,550 | 7,436 | ||||||||
Other expenses |
69,702 | 67,158 | 60,810 | ||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
519,601 | 515,255 | 431,649 | ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
402,746 | 343,105 | 261,806 | ||||||||
Applicable income taxes |
136,933 | 114,603 | 88,929 | ||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 265,813 | $ | 228,502 | $ | 172,877 | |||||
Earnings per share |
|||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.73 | $ | 1.53 | $ | 1.32 | |||||
Diluted |
1.72 | 1.52 | 1.31 | ||||||||
Average number of shares outstanding: |
|||||||||||
Basic |
153,598 | 149,053 | 131,144 | ||||||||
Diluted |
154,810 | 150,790 | 132,315 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
60
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 265,813 | $ | 228,502 | $ | 172,877 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale arising during the period, net of income taxes of $(503), $22,254, and $2,113 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively |
933 | (41,328 | ) | (3,867 | ) | |||||||
Less: reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on securities available for sale included in net income, net of income taxes of $796, $(8,629) and $2,641 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively |
(1,478 | ) | 16,025 | (4,903 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized losses, net of reclassification adjustments, on cash flow hedging instruments, net of income taxes of $414 and $4,706 in 2006 and 2005, respectively |
(769 | ) | (8,739 | ) | | |||||||
Additional minimum pension liability adjustment, net of income taxes of $(1,675) in 2006 and $1,675 in 2005, respectively |
3,325 | (3,325 | ) | | ||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 267,824 | $ | 191,135 | $ | 164,107 | ||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
61
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Common Stock | Additional Paid In Capital |
Treasury Stock |
Retained Earnings |
Unearned Compensation |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total Shareholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
126,974,668 | $ | 317,437 | $ | 237,134 | $ | | $ | 632,473 | $ | (1,134 | ) | $ | (458 | ) | $ | 1,185,452 | |||||||||||||
Shares issued under: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors plan |
70,770 | 176 | 686 | 862 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option plans |
715,180 | 1,788 | 4,653 | 6,441 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock plan, net |
2,490 | 6 | (77 | ) | (25 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
30,234 | 76 | 497 | 573 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares for business combination |
6,030,434 | 15,076 | 92,469 | 107,545 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of unearned compensation |
710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
8,332 | 8,332 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
172,877 | 172,877 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.58 per share) |
(75,635 | ) | (75,635 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of taxes |
(8,770 | ) | (8,770 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
133,823,776 | 334,559 | 343,694 | | 729,715 | (449 | ) | (9,228 | ) | 1,398,291 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors plan |
49,356 | 123 | 736 | 859 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option plans |
646,236 | 1,616 | 5,612 | 7,228 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock plan, net |
328,935 | 823 | 6,544 | (7,367 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
31,978 | 80 | 634 | 714 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
611 | 611 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares under forward sales agreement |
8,400,000 | 21,000 | 158,575 | 179,575 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares for business combinations |
12,322,466 | 30,806 | 243,298 | 274,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of common stock |
(1,359,927 | ) | (31,510 | ) | (31,510 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of unearned compensation |
1,386 | 1,386 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
228,502 | 228,502 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.61 per share) |
(89,702 | ) | (89,702 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of taxes |
(25,303 | ) | (25,303 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on cash flow hedging instruments, net of taxes |
(8,739 | ) | (8,739 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes |
(3,325 | ) | (3,325 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
154,242,820 | 389,007 | 759,704 | (31,510 | ) | 868,515 | (6,430 | ) | (46,595 | ) | 1,932,691 | |||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of SFAS 123(R) |
(6,430 | ) | 6,430 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors plan |
37,665 | 94 | 699 | 793 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option plans |
490,092 | 1,225 | 4,471 | 5,696 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock plan, net |
98,342 | 246 | (246 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
29,862 | 75 | 672 | 747 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
1,109 | 1,109 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense |
3,866 | 3,866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of common stock |
(2,046,400 | ) | (50,996 | ) | (50,996 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
265,813 | 265,813 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.68 per share) |
(104,818 | ) | (104,818 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of taxes |
(545 | ) | (545 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on cash flow hedging instruments, net of taxes and reclassification adjustments |
(769 | ) | (769 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes |
3,325 | 3,325 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized net actuarial pension gains, net of taxes |
423 | 423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
152,852,381 | $ | 390,647 | $ | 763,845 | $ | (82,506 | ) | $ | 1,029,510 | $ | | $ | (44,161 | ) | $ | 2,057,335 | |||||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
62
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 265,813 | $ | 228,502 | $ | 172,877 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
16,991 | 9,581 | 6,733 | |||||||||
Change in fair value of swap derivatives |
| 12,053 | 393 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
22,142 | 26,838 | 26,994 | |||||||||
Deferred taxes |
2,194 | (10,729 | ) | (2,904 | ) | |||||||
(Gains) losses on securities and derivatives, net |
(4,772 | ) | 24,654 | (7,544 | ) | |||||||
Gains on sales of other assets |
(1,518 | ) | (4,208 | ) | (1,443 | ) | ||||||
Gain on sale of branches |
| (37,020 | ) | | ||||||||
Gain on sale of Goldleaf |
(2,829 | ) | | | ||||||||
Net increase in loans held for sale |
(366,853 | ) | (419,396 | ) | (300,172 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in interest and other receivables |
(23,443 | ) | (30,895 | ) | 21,150 | |||||||
(Increase) decrease in prepaids |
(7,424 | ) | 17,850 | (11,049 | ) | |||||||
Increase in other assets |
(20,277 | ) | (4,353 | ) | (464 | ) | ||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses & accounts payable |
(7,690 | ) | (15,234 | ) | 47,576 | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued income taxes |
6,834 | (1,477 | ) | 236 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in interest payable |
20,261 | 14,533 | (229 | ) | ||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation |
(1,098 | ) | | | ||||||||
Other, net |
(12,332 | ) | 859 | 2,550 | ||||||||
Total adjustments |
(379,814 | ) | (416,944 | ) | (218,173 | ) | ||||||
Net cash from operating activities |
(114,001 | ) | (188,442 | ) | (45,296 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available for sale |
217,452 | 410,818 | 413,929 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
998,232 | 1,685,544 | 1,303,670 | |||||||||
Purchases of securities available for sale |
(1,458,439 | ) | (999,908 | ) | (2,201,606 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of held to maturity securities |
1,087 | 3,225 | 4,272 | |||||||||
Increase in securities purchased under agreements to resell |
(16,035 | ) | (368,411 | ) | (221,491 | ) | ||||||
Net increase in loans excluding proceeds from sales of interests in mortgage warehouse loans |
(573,922 | ) | (1,191,743 | ) | (781,358 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of interests in mortgage warehouse loans |
| 668,829 | | |||||||||
Net cash (paid) received in bank acquisitions |
| (114,872 | ) | 31,312 | ||||||||
Net cash paid in branch divestiture |
| (390,016 | ) | | ||||||||
Net cash received from Goldleaf divestiture (gross proceeds of $11.8 million) |
10,558 | | | |||||||||
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance |
(100,000 | ) | | (100,000 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance |
5,410 | | | |||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(109,225 | ) | (47,151 | ) | (44,744 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned |
12,286 | 13,657 | 23,118 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment |
4,069 | 3,315 | 2,447 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sales of other assets |
6,954 | 5,392 | 3,060 | |||||||||
Net investment in affiliates |
(8,041 | ) | (21,622 | ) | (2,321 | ) | ||||||
Net cash from investing activities |
(1,009,614 | ) | (342,943 | ) | (1,569,712 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Net increase in demand, savings and time deposits |
605,769 | 2,664,947 | 1,396,649 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings |
422,876 | (1,865,440 | ) | 568,976 | ||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
450,000 | 914,017 | 502,034 | |||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(262,666 | ) | (1,132,730 | ) | (746,909 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of common stock |
(50,996 | ) | (31,510 | ) | | |||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
6,443 | 7,942 | 6,906 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of shares under forward sales agreement |
| 179,575 | | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of treasury stock |
| | 147 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation |
1,098 | | | |||||||||
Dividends paid |
(104,818 | ) | (89,702 | ) | (75,635 | ) | ||||||
Net cash from financing activities |
1,067,706 | 647,099 | 1,652,168 | |||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(55,909 | ) | 115,714 | 37,160 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
498,591 | 382,877 | 345,717 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31 |
$ | 442,682 | $ | 498,591 | $ | 382,877 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: |
||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | 664,309 | $ | 435,388 | $ | 280,503 | ||||||
Income taxes |
136,425 | 107,530 | 87,969 | |||||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Transfer of loans to other real estate |
$ | 8,444 | $ | 11,303 | $ | 14,312 | ||||||
Transfer of loans to loans held for sale |
9,255 | 11,234 | 3,925 | |||||||||
Assets (non-cash) acquired in business combinations |
| 2,355,554 | 723,697 | |||||||||
Liabilities assumed in business combinations |
| 1,966,578 | 647,464 | |||||||||
Assets acquired under capital leases |
3,149 | 3,268 | | |||||||||
Assets (non-cash) sold in branch divestiture |
| 89,923 | | |||||||||
Liabilities sold in branch divestiture |
| 516,959 | | |||||||||
Assets (non-cash) sold in Goldleaf divestiture |
12,236 | | | |||||||||
Liabilities sold in Goldleaf divestiture |
4,507 | | | |||||||||
Common stock received for exercise of stock options |
| | 147 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
63
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies
The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (BancGroup, Colonial, or the Company) and its subsidiaries operate predominantly in the domestic commercial banking industry. The accounting and reporting policies of BancGroup and its subsidiaries conform to the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to general practice within the banking industry. The following summarizes the most significant of these policies.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BancGroup, those subsidiaries that are majority owned by BancGroup and over which BancGroup exercises control, and certain variable interest entities (VIEs) as described below. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
BancGroup considers a voting rights entity to be a subsidiary and consolidates it if BancGroup has a controlling financial interest in the entity. Variable interest entities are consolidated if BancGroup is exposed to the majority of the VIEs expected losses and/or residual returns (i.e., BancGroup is considered to be the primary beneficiary). Unconsolidated investments in voting rights entities or VIEs in which BancGroup has significant influence over operating and financing decisions (usually defined as a voting or economic interest of 20% to 50%) are accounted for using the equity method. Unconsolidated investments in voting rights entities or VIEs in which BancGroup has a voting or economic interest of less than 20% are generally carried at cost. See Note 8 for further discussion of VIEs.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
BancGroup considers cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased as cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits in banks and federal funds sold.
Business Combinations
BancGroup accounts for business combinations using the purchase method. Under the purchase method, net assets of the business acquired are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition with any excess of the cost of the acquisition over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired recorded as goodwill. Results of operations of the acquired business are included in the income statement from the date of acquisition. Refer to Note 2 for further information about the Companys business combinations.
Securities
Securities are classified as either held to maturity, available for sale or trading.
Held to maturity securities are securities which management has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. These securities are carried at amortized cost and adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discount.
64
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Securities available for sale represent those securities intended to be held for an indefinite period of time, including securities that management intends to use as part of its asset/liability strategy, or that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, the need to increase regulatory capital or other similar factors. Securities available for sale are recorded at market value with unrealized gains and losses net of any tax effect, added to or deducted directly from shareholders equity.
Trading securities are carried at market value with unrealized gains and losses reflected in income.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses are based on the specific identification method.
On a quarterly basis, held to maturity securities and securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position are reviewed to determine whether the losses are other-than-temporary. The review involves consideration of factors such as the severity and duration of the unrealized loss, the likelihood of a recovery in market value and the Companys ability and intent to hold the security until the market value recovers or the security matures. If the decline in value is deemed to be other-than-temporary, an impairment loss is recognized in earnings.
Loans Held For Sale
Loans held for sale include originated loans and acquired short-term participations in pools of mortgage loans. Originated loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market. Aggregate cost is the note amount plus certain net origination costs less discounts and fees collected.
The Company uses forward sales commitments as fair value hedges of its short-term participations in pools of mortgage loans. Accordingly, the carrying values of these hedged short-term participations are adjusted for changes in fair value. The fair values are calculated based on changes in market interest rates during the periods that the participations have been on the balance sheet. See Note 9 for discussion of the derivatives associated with this hedging strategy.
Net gains or losses on the sale of loans held for sale are included in mortgage banking income.
Loans
Loans are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income and acquisition-related adjustments, if any. Unearned income includes deferred fees net of deferred direct incremental loan origination costs. Unearned income is amortized to interest income, generally over the contractual life of the loan. Interest income on loans is recognized under the interest method.
Allowance for Loan Losses
A loan is considered impaired, based on current information and events, if it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Uncollateralized loans are measured for impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the historical effective interest rate, while all collateral-dependent loans are measured for impairment based on the fair value of the collateral or the expected market value of the loan contract. Smaller balance homogeneous loans that consist of residential mortgages and consumer loans are evaluated collectively and reserves are established based on historical loss experience.
Managements ongoing evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance also considers unimpaired loans and takes into consideration Colonial Banks past loan loss experience for pools of homogeneous loans, known and
65
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, and an analysis of current economic conditions. While management believes that it has established the allowance in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and has taken into account the views of its regulators and the current economic environment, there can be no assurance that in the future Colonial Banks regulators or its economic environment will not require further increases in, or re-allocation of, the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. Increases and decreases in the allowance due to changes in the measurement of the impaired loans are included in the provision for loan losses. When a loan or portion of a loan is determined to be uncollectible, the portion deemed uncollectible is charged against the allowance and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
Income Recognition on Impaired and Nonaccrual Loans
Loans, including impaired loans, are generally classified as nonaccrual if they are past due as to maturity or payment of principal or interest for a period of more than 90 days, unless such loans are well collateralized and in the process of collection. In addition, if a loan or a portion of a loan is classified as doubtful or is partially charged off, the loan is generally classified as nonaccrual. Loans that are on a current payment status or past due less than 90 days may also be classified as nonaccrual if repayment in full of principal and/or interest is in doubt. While a loan is classified as nonaccrual and the future collectibility of the recorded loan balance is doubtful, collections of interest and principal are generally applied as a reduction to principal outstanding. Loans will continue to be classified as impaired unless they are brought fully current and the collection of scheduled interest and principal is considered probable.
Acquired Loans
The Company generally acquires loans through business combinations rather than individually or in groups or portfolios. An acquired loan which has experienced deterioration of credit quality between origination and the Companys acquisition, and for which it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loans contractual terms, is accounted for under the provisions of Statement of Position 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer. For such loans, the Company estimates the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest, and other cash flows (including expected prepayments, if any) as of the acquisition date. The excess of the loans contractually required cash flows over the Companys expected cash flows is referred to as a nonaccretable difference and is not recorded by the Company. The loan is initially recorded at fair value, which represents the present value of the expected cash flows. The difference between the undiscounted expected cash flows and the fair value at which the loan is recorded is referred to as accretable yield and is accreted into interest income over the remaining expected life of the loan.
On a quarterly basis, the Company updates its estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. If the estimated cash flows have decreased, the Company creates a valuation allowance equal to the present value of the decrease in the cash flows and recognizes a loss. If the estimated cash flows have increased, the Company would first reverse any existing valuation allowance for that loan, and would then account for the remainder of the increase as an adjustment to the yield accreted on a prospective basis over the loans remaining life.
Sales and Servicing of Financial Assets
The Company has a facility through which it sells certain mortgage warehouse loans and mortgage loans held for sale to a wholly-owned special purpose entity (SPE) which then sells interests in those assets to third party commercial paper conduits. These transactions provide a source of liquidity for the Company and allow the
66
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company to utilize its balance sheet capacity and capital for higher-yielding assets while continuing to manage its customer relationships.
Any retained interests resulting from sales of financial assets should be recognized at the time of sale. Retained interests include such items as servicing assets or liabilities, subordinated tranches, interest-only strips, and cash reserve accounts. The previous carrying amount of the assets sold should be allocated between the retained interests and the assets sold based on each components fair value in relation to the total fair value at the date of sale. Any gain or loss recognized from the sale would depend in part on the allocation of value to the assets sold and interests retained.
Based on the structure of these transactions, the Companys only retained interest is the assets retained in the SPE as a first risk of loss position. The Company does retain servicing responsibilities for the assets sold and receives a servicing fee as compensation. However, due to the short-term nature of these assets and the Companys conclusion that the fee represents adequate compensation as a servicer, no servicing asset or liability is recorded. At the time of sale, the previous carrying amount of the assets is allocated between the interests sold and interests retained based on their relative fair values, which approximate cost because of the short-term and floating-rate nature of these assets. The sales price equals the Companys carrying amount for the assets sold, thus no gain or loss is recorded at the time of sale.
The Company provides credit enhancements to these transactions by maintaining assets in the SPE as a first risk of loss position to the interests sold to the commercial paper conduits. This credit risk is reviewed quarterly, and a reserve for loss exposure is maintained in the allowance for loan losses. The Company also provides 49% of the liquidity backstop facility to the commercial paper conduits. The Company, under this facility, may be required to purchase assets from the conduits in certain limited circumstances, including the conduits inability to place commercial paper. Colonial includes this liquidity risk in its liquidity risk analysis to ensure that it would have sufficient sources of liquidity.
Premises and Equipment
Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed generally using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Capitalized lease assets and leasehold improvements are amortized over the terms of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter. Estimated useful lives range from five to forty years for bank buildings and leasehold improvements and three to ten years for furniture and equipment. Amortization of assets recorded under capital leases is included in depreciation expense.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged against earnings as incurred. Costs of major additions and improvements are capitalized.
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned includes real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed taken in lieu of foreclosure. These amounts are recorded at the lower of outstanding balance or market value less estimated costs to sell the property. Any write-down from the cost to market value required at the time of foreclosure is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent write-downs and gains or losses recognized on the sale of these properties are included in noninterest income.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets represent purchased assets that also lack physical substance but can be distinguished from
67
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights or because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged either on its own or in combination with a related contract, asset, or liability. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and are reviewed for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. All of BancGroups other intangible assets have finite lives ranging from six to eight years. Refer to Note 11 for further information about the Companys goodwill and other intangible assets.
Long Lived Assets
BancGroup reviews long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized. Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
Income Taxes
BancGroup uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under that method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded at currently enacted tax rates applicable to the period in which assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in statutory tax rates resulting in income adjustments in the period such changes are enacted.
Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Under SFAS 123(R), all stock-based payments are measured at fair value at the date of grant and expensed over their vesting or service period. The expense is recognized using the straight-line method. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock based-compensation under the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Under APB 25, compensation cost was only recognized for the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. As such, under APB 25 the Company generally recognized no compensation expense for stock options since the exercise price equaled the market price of BancGroup common stock on the grant dates. The Company did, however, recognize compensation cost for restricted stock awards since such awards have no exercise price.
The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method under which compensation cost is recognized beginning on January 1, 2006 (a) based on the requirements of SFAS 123(R) for all awards granted on or after January 1, 2006 and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for all awards granted prior to, and that remain unvested as of, January 1, 2006. The modified prospective transition method does not require the restatement of prior periods to reflect the fair value method of expensing stock-based compensation. SFAS 123(R) does require a cumulative effect adjustment of previously recognized compensation expense in order to estimate forfeitures for awards outstanding on the adoption date. The cumulative effect adjustment was immaterial.
68
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The adoption of SFAS 123(R) had the following effects on the Companys financial results for the year ended December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
||||
Income before taxes |
$ | (2,039 | ) | |
Net income |
(1,889 | ) | ||
Basic earnings per share |
(0.01 | ) | ||
Diluted earnings per share |
(0.01 | ) | ||
Cash flows from operating activities |
(1,098 | ) | ||
Cash flows from financing activities |
1,098 |
Total compensation cost for stock-based compensation awards (both stock options and restricted stock awards) recognized under the fair value method during 2006 was $3.9 million. The related income tax benefit was $826,000. Pro forma financial information as if compensation cost had been recognized under the fair value method for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Net income: |
||||||||
As reported |
$ | 228,502 | $ | 172,877 | ||||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under intrinsic value method included in reported net income, net of tax |
923 | 469 | ||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of tax |
(2,283 | ) | (1,843 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 227,142 | $ | 171,503 | ||||
Basic earnings per share: |
||||||||
As reported |
$ | 1.53 | $ | 1.32 | ||||
Pro forma |
$ | 1.52 | $ | 1.31 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||
As reported |
$ | 1.52 | $ | 1.31 | ||||
Pro forma |
$ | 1.51 | $ | 1.30 |
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Key input assumptions used in the model include the exercise price of the award, the expected option term, the expected volatility of the Companys stock over the options expected term, the risk-free interest rate over the options expected term and the Companys expected annual dividend yield. The Company believes that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in estimating the fair value of the Companys stock options granted. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by the stock option recipients. As a result of implementing SFAS 123(R), the Company refined its process for estimating expected option term and expected stock price volatility.
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|||||||
Expected option term |
5.33 years | 5 years | 5 years | ||||||
Weighted average expected volatility |
22.8 | % | 25.0 | % | 26.8 | % | |||
Weighted average risk-free interest rate |
4.82 | % | 4.13 | % | 3.62 | % | |||
Weighted average expected annual dividend yield |
2.70 | % | 2.68 | % | 2.95 | % |
69
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For options granted during 2006, the expected option term was determined based upon the Companys historical experience with employees exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. The expected volatility was determined based upon historical daily prices of the Companys common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected option term, as well as implied price volatility based on the Companys exchange traded options. The indicated historical and implied volatilities were weighted 75% and 25%, respectively. Less emphasis was placed on implied volatility compared to historical volatility because the volume of exchange traded options is relatively low. The risk-free rate was determined based on the interpolated rate as of the grant date of a zero coupon treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected option term. The expected annual dividend yield was determined based on forecasted dividends for 2006 and the Companys stock price as of December 31, 2005.
For options granted during 2005 and 2004, the expected option term was determined based on consideration of the option attributes (five year graded vesting; ten year total option life) as well as the guidance of SFAS 123 which stated that when presented with a range of reasonable estimates for expected option life, if no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, it is appropriate to use an estimate at the low end of the range. The expected volatility was determined based on analysis of historical monthly prices of the Companys common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected option term. The risk-free rate was determined based on the rate of a constant maturity treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected option term. The expected annual dividend yield was determined based on forecasted dividends and the Companys stock price as of the grant date.
See Note 18 for additional information on the Companys stock plans.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company utilizes derivatives to manage interest rate risk and facilitate other asset/liability management strategies. Derivative instruments are used to hedge specific assets, liabilities or cash flows as a part of this overall process. The Company also recognizes certain contracts and commitments as derivatives when the characteristics of those contracts and commitments meet the definition of a derivative. All derivative instruments are carried at fair value.
Derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are recorded in noninterest income and are offset by the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability. The change in fair value of the hedged asset or liability is included in the basis of the hedged item, while the corresponding change in the fair value of the derivative instrument is recorded as an adjustment to other assets or other liabilities.
Derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. These derivatives are recorded as either a freestanding asset or liability. The effective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative instrument is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is recognized in other noninterest income during the period of change.
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking each hedge transaction. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged item; the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; the derivative is de-designated because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur; or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.
70
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
When hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative continues to be carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in other noninterest income. When a fair value hedge is discontinued, the hedged asset or liability is no longer adjusted for changes in fair value and the existing basis adjustment is amortized or accreted as an adjustment of yield over the remaining life of the asset or liability. When a cash flow hedge is discontinued but the hedged cash flows or forecasted transaction are still expected to occur, unrealized gains and losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income are recognized in earnings in the same period when the earnings are affected by the hedged cash flow. When a cash flow hedge is discontinued because a forecasted transaction is not expected to occur, unrealized gains and losses in other comprehensive income are recognized in earnings immediately.
For derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, all changes in fair value are recognized in noninterest income during the period of change. The net cash settlement on these derivatives is also included in noninterest income.
The Company is exposed to credit and market risk by using derivative instruments. If the counterparty fails to perform, credit risk is equal to the extent of the fair value gain in a derivative. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, this generally indicates that the counterparty owes the Company, and, therefore, creates a repayment risk for the Company unless it is collateralized. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, the Company owes the counterparty and, therefore, it has no repayment risk. The Company minimizes the credit (or repayment) risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with high quality counterparties that are approved by the Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO) and requiring collateral when market value exceeds agreed upon levels.
Market risk is the adverse effect that a change in interest rates, or implied volatility rates, has on the value of a financial instrument. The Company manages the market risk by using derivatives chiefly for hedging purposes and then monitoring the effectiveness of the hedges.
The Companys derivatives activities are monitored by ALCO as part of that committees oversight of BancGroups asset/liability and treasury functions. ALCO is responsible for reviewing the hedging strategies that are developed by Treasury, through its analysis of data from financial simulation models and other internal and industry sources. The resulting hedging strategies are then incorporated into BancGroups overall interest rate risk management and strategies.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are generally treated as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at the amount at which the securities were acquired or sold. The fair value of collateral either received from or provided to a third party is continually monitored and additional collateral is obtained or is requested to be returned to Colonial as deemed appropriate.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income is accrued and recognized in earnings as services are provided and the amount of income earned is reasonably determinable.
71
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
Recent Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which establishes a two-step process for recognizing and measuring tax benefits. It applies to all tax positions within the scope of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under FIN 48, tax benefits can only be recognized in the financial statements if it is more likely than not that they would be sustained after full review by the relevant taxing authority. If a tax position meets the recognition threshold, the benefit to be recorded is equal to the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. Any difference between the full amount of the tax benefit and the amount recorded in the financial statements will be recognized as higher tax expense. Required disclosures will include a tabular rollforward of the beginning and ending aggregate unrecognized tax benefits as well as specific detail related to tax uncertainties for which it is reasonably possible the amount of unrecognized tax benefit will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months.
FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 will be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The changes required by FIN 48 are not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. Prior to SFAS 157, there were different definitions of fair value and limited guidance for applying those definitions. Moreover, that guidance was dispersed among the many accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 provides a single definition of fair value, together with a framework for measuring it, and requires additional disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The Statement does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances.
SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The provisions of the Statement will be applied prospectively as of the effective date, except in limited circumstances in which the provisions will be applied retrospectively to certain securities and financial instruments as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact SFAS 157 will have on the financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. SFAS 158 requires companies to fully recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of defined benefit pension plans as assets or liabilities, respectively. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plans assets and the projected benefit obligation. In addition, SFAS 158 requires companies to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of year-end. Currently, companies are permitted to choose a measurement date up to three months prior to year-end. The provision to require recognition of the funded status of the plan is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The provision to require measurement of assets and obligations at year-end will be effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The measurement date utilized by BancGroup for its pension plan is the Companys year end. On December 31, 2005, BancGroup closed its pension plan to new employees and set the compensation amount and years of service for the future benefits calculation for participants. As a result of adopting SFAS 158 on December 31, 2006, BancGroup recognized an increase of $641,000 to the balance of its pension asset.
72
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a final consensus on Issue 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. EITF 06-4 stipulates that an agreement by the employer to share a portion of the proceeds of a life insurance policy with the employee during the postretirement period is a postretirement benefit arrangement for which a liability must be recorded. The consensus is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. Entities will have the option of applying the provisions of EITF 06-4 as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings or retrospectively to all prior periods. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact EITF 06-4 will have on the financial statements.
In September 2006, the EITF reached a final consensus on Issue 06-5, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance. EITF 06-5 stipulates that the cash surrender value and any additional amounts provided by the contractual terms of the insurance policy that are realizable at the balance sheet date should be considered in determining the amount that could be realized under FTB 85-4, and any amounts that are not immediately payable to the policyholder in cash should be discounted to their present value. Also, in determining the amount that could be realized, companies should assume that policies will be surrendered on an individual-by-individual basis, rather than surrendering the entire group policy. The consensus is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Entities will have the option of applying the provisions of EITF 06-5 as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings or retrospectively to all prior periods. Colonial will apply the provisions as a cumulative effect adjustment. As a result of adopting EITF 06-5 on January 1, 2007, BancGroup will recognize a decrease of $540,000 to the balance of bank-owned life insurance.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which permits companies to elect to measure certain eligible items at fair value. Subsequent unrealized gains and losses on those items will be reported in earnings. Upfront costs and fees related to those items will be reported in earnings as incurred and not deferred.
SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. If a company elects to apply the provisions of the Statement to eligible items existing at that date, the effect of the remeasurement to fair value will be reported as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Retrospective application will not be permitted. The Company is currently assessing whether it will elect to use the fair value option for any of its eligible items.
2. Business Combinations
Union Bank Acquisition
BancGroup completed the acquisition of UB Financial Corporations wholly-owned subsidiary, Union Bank of Florida (Union), a Florida state chartered bank, on February 10, 2005. Unions results of operations were included in BancGroups consolidated financial results beginning February 11, 2005. The acquisition enhanced BancGroups geographic position and expanded BancGroups banking operations within existing locations in Florida, primarily the Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach markets. Total consideration for the transaction was $233.4 million, consisting of 2,903,402 shares of BancGroup common stock valued at $58.7 million and $174.7 million in cash.
FFLC Bancorp, Inc. Acquisition
BancGroup completed the acquisition of FFLC Bancorp, Inc. (FFLC) and its subsidiary, First Federal Savings Bank of Lake County, on May 18, 2005. FFLCs results of operations were included in BancGroups consolidated financial results beginning May 19, 2005. FFLC operated 16 full-service branches in Lake, Sumter,
73
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Citrus and Marion counties in Central Florida. This acquisition was part of the Companys ongoing effort to expand its presence in high growth markets. Total consideration for the transaction was $247.3 million, consisting of 9,419,064 shares of BancGroup common stock valued at $212.7 million, $31.9 million in cash, and stock options valued at $2.7 million.
3. Securities
The carrying and market values of held to maturity securities are summarized as follows:
Held to Maturity Securities
December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gains |
Unrealized Losses |
Market Value |
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gains |
Unrealized Losses |
Market Value | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities |
$ | 500 | $ | 97 | $ | | $ | 597 | $ | 500 | $ | 115 | $ | | $ | 615 | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities of Government Sponsored Entities |
736 | 19 | | 755 | 957 | 30 | (1 | ) | 986 | ||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations of Government Sponsored Entities |
11 | | | 11 | 13 | | | 13 | |||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
627 | 17 | | 644 | 1,480 | 32 | | 1,512 | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,874 | $ | 133 | $ | | $ | 2,007 | $ | 2,950 | $ | 177 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 3,126 | ||||||||
The carrying and market values of securities available for sale are summarized as follows:
Securities Available For Sale
December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gains |
Unrealized Losses |
Market Value |
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gains |
Unrealized Losses |
Market Value | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities |
$ | 175,000 | $ | | $ | (8,519 | ) | $ | 166,481 | $ | 193,109 | $ | | $ | (8,552 | ) | $ | 184,557 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities of Government Sponsored Entities |
361,881 | 946 | (10,752 | ) | 352,075 | 369,586 | 980 | (10,875 | ) | 359,691 | ||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations of Government Sponsored Entities |
672,040 | 348 | (11,608 | ) | 660,780 | 709,319 | 41 | (10,597 | ) | 698,763 | ||||||||||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations |
1,696,652 | 1,125 | (26,804 | ) | 1,670,973 | 1,438,060 | | (26,056 | ) | 1,412,004 | ||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
78,465 | 343 | (205 | ) | 78,603 | 41,310 | 780 | (34 | ) | 42,056 | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
153,540 | 1,165 | (3 | ) | 154,702 | 143,145 | 1,192 | (4 | ) | 144,333 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,137,578 | $ | 3,927 | $ | (57,891 | ) | 3,083,614 | $ | 2,894,529 | $ | 2,993 | $ | (56,118 | ) | $ | 2,841,404 | |||||||||
The market values are based upon quotes from third-party pricing services.
Included in the other category of securities available for sale are $153.3 million and $142.7 million in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and Federal Reserve stock at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
74
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Securities with a carrying value of approximately $2.6 billion and $2.7 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were pledged for various purposes as required or permitted by law.
Gross gains of approximately $11.5 million, $482,000 and $9.6 million and gross losses of approximately $9.2 million, $25.1 million and $2.0 million were realized on sales of securities or the designation of the Companys intent to sell securities for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The amortized cost and market value of debt securities at December 31, 2006, by contractual maturity, are as follows. Expected maturities differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Held to Maturity Securities | Securities Available For Sale | |||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Market Value |
Amortized Cost |
Market Value | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 140 | $ | 141 | $ | 7,089 | $ | 7,119 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
232 | 236 | 13,545 | 13,672 | ||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
755 | 864 | 129,230 | 122,944 | ||||||||
Due after ten years |
| | 103,601 | 101,349 | ||||||||
Total |
1,127 | 1,241 | 253,465 | 245,084 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities of Government Sponsored Entities |
736 | 755 | 361,881 | 352,075 | ||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations of Government Sponsored Entities |
11 | 11 | 672,040 | 660,780 | ||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations |
| | 1,696,652 | 1,670,973 | ||||||||
Equity securities |
| | 153,540 | 154,702 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,874 | $ | 2,007 | $ | 3,137,578 | $ | 3,083,614 | ||||
The following table reflects BancGroups investments gross unrealized losses and market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2006.
Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Market Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Market Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Market Value |
Unrealized Losses |
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities |
$ | | $ | | $ | 166,481 | $ | (8,519 | ) | $ | 166,481 | $ | (8,519 | ) | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities of Government Sponsored Entities |
13,805 | (32 | ) | 215,553 | (10,720 | ) | 229,358 | (10,752 | ) | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations of Government Sponsored Entities |
67,102 | (337 | ) | 484,294 | (11,271 | ) | 551,396 | (11,608 | ) | ||||||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations |
404,876 | (3,084 | ) | 962,517 | (23,720 | ) | 1,367,393 | (26,804 | ) | ||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
14,330 | (187 | ) | 3,634 | (18 | ) | 17,964 | (205 | ) | ||||||||||||
Subtotal, debt securities |
500,113 | (3,640 | ) | 1,832,479 | (54,248 | ) | 2,332,592 | (57,888 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
| | 6 | (3 | ) | 6 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
$ | 500,113 | $ | (3,640 | ) | $ | 1,832,485 | $ | (54,251 | ) | $ | 2,332,598 | $ | (57,891 | ) | ||||||
75
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The securities above consist of debentures of Government Sponsored Entities, collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and mortgage-backed securities of Government Sponsored Entities, AAA-rated private CMOs, and obligations of state and political subdivisions. As of December 31, 2006, there were 201 securities carried at an unrealized loss relating to the level of interest rates prevailing in the market. Because of the creditworthiness of the issuers and because the future direction of interest rates is unknown, the impairments are deemed to be temporary. The severity and duration of such impairments are determined by the level of interest rates set by the market. Additionally, BancGroup has the ability to retain these securities until recovery of the unrealized loss or maturity when full repayment would be received. There are also no known current funding needs which would require their liquidation.
The following table reflects BancGroups investments gross unrealized losses and market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2005.
Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Description of Securities |
Market Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Market Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Market Value |
Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities |
$ | | $ | | $ | 184,557 | $ | (8,552 | ) | $ | 184,557 | $ | (8,552 | ) | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities of Government Sponsored Entities |
136,313 | (1,223 | ) | 177,620 | (9,653 | ) | 313,933 | (10,876 | ) | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations of Government Sponsored Entities |
469,150 | (3,395 | ) | 203,281 | (7,202 | ) | 672,431 | (10,597 | ) | ||||||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations |
335,845 | (5,671 | ) | 612,561 | (20,385 | ) | 948,406 | (26,056 | ) | ||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
5,391 | (34 | ) | | | 5,391 | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||
Subtotal, debt securities |
946,699 | (10,323 | ) | 1,178,019 | (45,792 | ) | 2,124,718 | (56,115 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
| | 4 | (4 | ) | 4 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
$ | 946,699 | $ | (10,323 | ) | $ | 1,178,023 | $ | (45,796 | ) | $ | 2,124,722 | $ | (56,119 | ) | ||||||
The securities above consist of debentures of Government Sponsored Entities, collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and mortgage-backed securities of Government Sponsored Entities, AAA-rated private CMOs, and obligations of state and political subdivisions. As of December 31, 2005, there were 189 securities carried at an unrealized loss relating to the level of interest rates prevailing in the market. Because of the creditworthiness of the issuers and because the future direction of interest rates is unknown, the impairments are deemed to be temporary. The severity and duration of such impairments are determined by the level of interest rates set by the market.
76
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. Loans
A summary of the major categories of loans outstanding is shown in the table below.
December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Commercial, financial, agricultural |
$ | 1,158,755 | $ | 1,107,494 | ||||
Commercial real estate |
4,291,979 | 4,424,465 | ||||||
Real estate construction |
6,340,324 | 5,483,424 | ||||||
Residential real estate |
2,987,212 | 3,048,007 | ||||||
Consumer and other |
438,375 | 372,470 | ||||||
Total loans, excluding mortgage warehouse loans |
15,216,645 | 14,435,860 | ||||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
281,693 | 483,701 | ||||||
Total loans |
15,498,338 | 14,919,561 | ||||||
Less: unearned income |
(19,449 | ) | (19,697 | ) | ||||
Total loans, net of unearned income |
$ | 15,478,889 | $ | 14,899,864 | ||||
BancGroups lending is concentrated in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Nevada and Texas and repayment of these loans is in part dependent upon the economic conditions in the respective regions of these states. Management does not believe the loan portfolio contains concentrations of credits, either geographically or by borrower, which would increase BancGroups risk exposure. Management continually evaluates the potential risk in all segments of the portfolio in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Other than a large portion of loans being in the commercial, residential and construction real estate categories, management is not aware of any significant concentrations.
Loans classified as commercial real estate loans are loans which are collateralized by real estate held for investment and business purposes. These loans are substantially dependent upon cash flows from income producing improvements attached to the real estate or, in the case of owner-occupied commercial real estate, the cash flows produced by the enterprises occupying the real estate. For BancGroup, commercial real estate property types primarily consist of retail properties, office buildings, apartments, warehouses, churches, schools, lodging, recreational and health service facilities. The real estate held as collateral on these loans is not raw land or property under construction or development as those property types fall into the real estate construction portfolio.
Commercial Real Estate loans are underwritten based on projected cash flows and loan-to-appraised-value ratios of 85% or less. The risks associated with commercial real estate loans primarily relate to real estate values in local market areas, the equity investments of borrowers, and the borrowers experience and expertise. BancGroup has diversified its portfolio of commercial real estate loans, resulting in less than 25.5% of its total commercial real estate loan portfolio and less than 7.1% of its total loan portfolio concentrated in any of the above-mentioned income producing activities.
Real Estate Construction loans include loans to finance single family and multi-family residential as well as nonresidential real estate. The principal risks associated with these loans are related to the borrowers ability to complete the project, local market demand, the sales market, presales or preleasing, and permanent loan commitments. BancGroup evaluates presale requirements, preleasing rates, permanent loan take-out commitments, as well as other factors in underwriting construction loans.
77
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Residential Real Estate loans consist of loans made to finance one-to-four family residences and home equity loans on residences. BancGroups policy is to loan up to 90% of appraised value on these loans without other collateral or security. These loans are largely made up of adjustable rate loans. The principal risks associated with one-to-four family residential loans are the borrowers income and real estate values.
Colonials mortgage warehouse lending department provides lines of credit collateralized by residential mortgage loans and other services to mortgage companies. Warehouse loans outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $282 million and $484 million, respectively.
BancGroup evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by BancGroup upon extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, residential houses, land, owner-occupied commercial real estate and income-producing commercial properties. No additional credit risk exposure, relating to outstanding loan balances, is believed to exist beyond the amounts shown in the consolidated statement of condition at December 31, 2006.
In the normal course of business, loans are made to officers, directors, principal shareholders and to companies in which they own a significant interest. Loan activity to such parties with an aggregate loan balance of more than $60,000 during the year ended December 31, 2006 is summarized as follows:
Balance |
Additions |
Reductions |
Balance | |||
(In thousands) | ||||||
$32,000 |
$76,996 | $32,237 | $76,759 |
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the recorded investment in impaired loans was approximately $9.9 million and $22.1 million, respectively. The impaired loans were measured for impairment based primarily on the value of underlying collateral. The related allowance allocated to impaired loans for 2006 and 2005 was approximately $2.3 million and $3.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2006, impaired loans with an associated allowance totaled approximately $4.8 million, while approximately $5.1 million of impaired loans had no related allowance. At December 31, 2005, impaired loans with an associated allowance totaled approximately $13.6 million, while approximately $8.5 million of impaired loans had no related allowance. The average recorded investment in impaired loans was approximately $18.1 million, $22.8 million and $43.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The amount of interest recognized on impaired loans during the portion of the year that they were impaired was not significant for 2006, 2005 or 2004.
BancGroup uses several factors in determining if a loan is impaired. Generally, nonaccrual loans as well as loans classified as substandard with balances in excess of a specified amount are reviewed for impairment. The internal asset classification procedures include a thorough review of significant loans and lending relationships, and include the accumulation of related data. This data includes loan payment status, borrowers financial data, collateral value and borrowers operating factors such as cash flows and operating income or loss.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans was approximately $14.0 million and $25.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the recorded investment in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing was approximately $8.1 million and $10.3 million, respectively.
During 2006, BancGroup transferred nonaccrual loans with a net book value of $9.3 million to loans held for sale. Prior to the transfer to held for sale, BancGroup charged down the loans to fair value. The loans were subsequently sold in January 2007.
78
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Loans with a carrying value of approximately $7.3 billion and $8.8 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were pledged as collateral for credit facilities.
The following table represents information concerning residential real estate loans, including securitizations, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005:
December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Total Principal Amount |
Total 90 Days or More Past due |
Total Principal Amount |
Total 90 Days or More Past due |
Net Credit Losses |
Net Credit Losses | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total residential real estate loans managed |
$ | 3,013,629 | $ | 8,979 | $ | 3,085,243 | $ | 7,819 | $ | 1,274 | $ | 2,572 | ||||||
Less: |
||||||||||||||||||
Loans securitized |
26,417 | 217 | 37,236 | 77 | | | ||||||||||||
Total residential real estate loans held for investment |
$ | 2,987,212 | $ | 8,762 | $ | 3,048,007 | $ | 7,742 | $ | 1,274 | $ | 2,572 | ||||||
Fair value of retained mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 4,324 | $ | 6,312 |
5. Allowance for Loan Losses
An analysis of the allowance for loan losses is as follows:
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance, January 1 |
$ | 171,051 | $ | 148,802 | $ | 138,549 | ||||||
Addition due to acquisitions |
| 14,622 | 6,857 | |||||||||
Provision charged to income |
22,142 | 26,838 | 26,994 | |||||||||
Loans charged off |
(30,779 | ) | (27,206 | ) | (29,811 | ) | ||||||
Recoveries |
12,436 | 7,995 | 6,213 | |||||||||
Balance, December 31 |
$ | 174,850 | $ | 171,051 | $ | 148,802 | ||||||
6. Sales and Servicing of Financial Assets
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company structured a facility in which it sold certain mortgage warehouse loans and mortgage loans held for sale to a wholly-owned special purpose entity (SPE) which then sold interests in those assets to third-party commercial paper conduits (conduits). A total of $1.5 billion was sold to the conduits in 2005.
During 2006, the Company sold an additional $500 million to the conduits, bringing the total outstanding balance to $2.0 billion at December 31, 2006. Based on the structure of these transactions, the Companys only retained interest is the assets retained in the SPE as a first risk of loss position. No gain or loss was recorded at the time of sale. The Company receives servicing income based on a percentage of the outstanding balance of assets sold. During 2006, the Company recognized approximately $22.1 million of noninterest income related to these transactions, of which $17.0 million was servicing income, and received $22.1 million in cash. During 2005, the Company recognized approximately $13.9 million of noninterest income related to these transactions, of which $8.7 million was servicing income, and received $11.9 million in cash.
79
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents a summary of the components of managed financial assets, representing both owned and sold assets, along with quantitative information about delinquencies and net credit losses:
As of December 31, 2006 | Year ended December 31, 2006 | |||||||||||
Principal Balance |
Loans past due 30 days or more |
Average Balance |
Net Credit Losses | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage warehouse loans |
||||||||||||
Assets managed |
$ | 606,610 | $ | | $ | 777,972 | $ | | ||||
less: interests sold |
324,917 | | 429,948 | | ||||||||
Assets held in portfolio |
$ | 281,693 | $ | | $ | 348,024 | $ | | ||||
Loans held for sale |
||||||||||||
Assets managed |
$ | 3,149,083 | $ | | $ | 2,624,989 | $ | | ||||
less: interests sold |
1,675,083 | | 1,250,874 | | ||||||||
Assets held in portfolio |
$ | 1,474,000 | $ | | $ | 1,374,115 | $ | | ||||
7. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Commitments to Extend Credit
To meet the financial needs of its customers, BancGroup is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business. The credit risk associated with these instruments is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and is subject to BancGroups credit policies. Credit risk associated with these instruments is represented by the contractual amounts indicated in the table below.
December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk: |
||||||
Loan commitments |
$ | 5,574,925 | $ | 6,459,365 | ||
Standby letters of credit |
319,305 | 268,527 | ||||
Commercial letters of credit |
4,379 | 1,431 | ||||
Credit card guarantees |
6,222 | 5,962 |
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The total contractual amount of commitments represents the maximum credit risk and the maximum potential amount of future payments that could be required to be made. However, because many commitments expire without being drawn upon, total commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Standby letters of credit are contingent commitments issued by Colonial Bank generally to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. A financial standby letter of credit is a commitment by Colonial Bank to guarantee a customers repayment of an outstanding loan or debt instrument. In a performance standby letter of credit, Colonial Bank guarantees a customers performance under a contractual nonfinancial obligation for which it receives a fee. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions. The Company holds various assets as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary. FIN 45 requires the
80
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
fair value of these commitments to be recorded on the balance sheet. The fair value of the commitment typically approximates the fee received from the customer for issuing such commitments. These fees are deferred and are recognized over the commitment period. The amount recorded for deferred fees as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 was not material to the Companys consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2006, Colonial Bank, N.A. had standby letters of credit outstanding with maturities of generally one year or less. At December 31, 2006, the maximum potential amount of future undiscounted payments the Company could be required to make under outstanding standby letters of credit was $319 million.
Commercial letters of credit are issued to facilitate trade transactions. Under the terms of a commercial letter of credit, as a general rule, drafts will be drawn when the underlying transaction is consummated as intended. Since the conditions requiring the Company to fund letters of credit may not occur, the Company expects its liquidity requirements to be less than the total outstanding commitments.
Credit card guarantees are issued by Colonial Bank to guarantee customers repayment of outstanding credit card loans. The guarantees remain in effect for the life of the related credit card accounts. The Company holds interest bearing deposits as collateral supporting those guarantees for which collateral is deemed necessary. Since the conditions requiring the Company to honor these guarantees may not occur, the Company expects its liquidity requirements to be less than the total outstanding commitments.
The Company enters into indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business under which it agrees to indemnify third parties against any damages, losses and expenses incurred in connection with legal and other proceedings arising from relationships or transactions with the Company. These relationships or transactions include those arising from service as a director or officer of the Company or its subsidiaries, underwriting agreements relating to the Companys securities, acquisition agreements, and various other business transactions or arrangements. Because the extent of the Companys obligations under these agreements depends entirely upon the occurrence of future events, the Companys potential future liability under these agreements is not determinable.
During 2005 the Company entered into a build-to-suit lease arrangement for a new corporate headquarters facility. In connection with this transaction, the Company agreed to guarantee the residual value of the leased property. The Company would be required to perform under the guarantee in the event that the lessor is unable to recover its investment in the leased asset by selling the asset at the end of the lease term in 2012. The maximum potential amount that the Company could be required to pay under the guarantee is $39.2 million. The carrying value of the liability recorded for this obligation was $2.0 million at December 31, 2006.
81
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Commitments Under Capital and Operating Lease Obligations
BancGroup and its subsidiaries have entered into certain noncancellable leases for premises and equipment used in connection with its operations. The majority of these noncancellable lease agreements contain renewal options for varying periods at the same or renegotiated rentals, and several contain purchase options at fair value. Future minimum lease payments under all capital leases and noncancellable operating leases with initial or remaining terms (exclusive of renewal options) of one year or more at December 31, 2006 were as follows:
Capital Leases |
Operating Leases | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
2007 |
$ | 2,732 | $ | 35,886 | ||
2008 |
448 | 32,941 | ||||
2009 |
195 | 27,595 | ||||
2010 |
177 | 25,544 | ||||
2011 |
147 | 23,398 | ||||
Thereafter |
979 | 111,312 | ||||
Total minimum lease payments |
4,678 | $ | 256,676 | |||
Less: imputed interest |
550 | |||||
Present value of minimum lease payments |
$ | 4,128 | ||||
Rent expense for all leases amounted to $39.3 million in 2006, $37.5 million in 2005 and $32.0 million in 2004.
Contingencies
BancGroup and its subsidiaries are, from time to time, defendants in legal actions arising from normal business activities. Management does not anticipate that the outcome of any litigation pending at December 31, 2006 will have a material adverse effect on BancGroups consolidated financial statements or the results of operations.
8. Variable Interest Entities
BancGroup holds variable interests in six special purpose trusts which were formed for the issuance of trust preferred securities to outside investors. The Company does not absorb a majority of the expected losses or residual returns of the trusts, therefore the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary and does not consolidate them. The Companys equity investments in the trusts, totaling $9 million, represent BancGroups maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the trusts. Total assets of the trusts are $306 million as of December 31, 2006. Refer to Note 14, Long-Term Debt for additional information.
BancGroup holds variable interests in ten joint ventures formed for the purpose of developing residential real estate. Three of the entities are required to be consolidated, while the other seven are not. For the consolidated entities, total assets were $9.9 million as of December 31, 2006, and the Companys maximum exposure to loss was $8.5 million. For the unconsolidated entities, total assets were $96.9 million as of December 31, 2006, and the Companys maximum exposure to loss was $64.8 million.
BancGroup holds a variable interest in an entity which provides home automation products. The entity is not required to be consolidated. The entitys total assets were $3.9 million as of December 31, 2006, and the Companys maximum exposure to loss was $3.8 million.
82
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
BancGroup holds variable interests in several entities formed to provide affordable housing. The entities had total assets of approximately $370 million as of December 31, 2006, and the Companys maximum exposure to loss is approximately $7.8 million. The Company is not required to consolidate these entities.
As discussed in Note 6, the Company sells certain financial assets to a wholly-owned SPE which then sells interests in those assets to third-party commercial paper conduits. While the Company has a variable interest in specified assets of these conduits, it does not have a variable interest in the conduits as a whole and therefore cannot be considered to be the primary beneficiary. The Companys maximum exposure to credit loss at December 31, 2006 as a result of its involvement with these non-consolidated conduits is $87 million, which is the maximum amount that would be paid by the Company in the event of credit-related defaults.
9. Derivatives
Derivative instruments used by the Company consist of interest rate swaps, commitments to originate and sell mortgage loans and options. Derivatives are recorded at fair value in other assets or other liabilities.
Interest Rate Swaps
Fair Value Hedges
During 2006, the Company used interest rate swaps as fair value hedges of subordinated debt, long-term FHLB advances and brokered CDs. The FHLB advance hedges were terminated during the year, and the brokered CD hedges matured, leaving only the subordinated debt hedges in effect as of December 31, 2006. The interest rate swaps used in the subordinated debt hedges had an aggregate notional amount of $337.3 million and an aggregate net loss of $1.75 million as of December 31, 2006. The Company recognized losses due to hedge ineffectiveness of approximately $204,000 during 2006. There were no hedging gains or losses resulting from hedge ineffectiveness recognized during 2005 or 2004.
Cash Flow Hedges
During the second quarter of 2006, the Company terminated interest rate swaps which were used in cash flow hedges of loans. The hedged forecasted transactions are still considered probable of occurring, therefore the net loss will remain in accumulated other comprehensive loss and be reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings (ending in June of 2008). The estimated amount of losses to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months is $6.3 million. There were no cash flow hedging gains or losses resulting from hedge ineffectiveness recognized during 2006, 2005 or 2004.
Commitments to Originate and Sell Mortgage Loans
In connection with its retail mortgage loan production activities, the Company routinely enters into short-term commitments to fund residential mortgage loans (commonly referred to as interest rate locks). A mortgage loan commitment binds the Company to lend funds to a potential borrower at a specified interest rate and within a specified period of time, generally up to 60 days after inception of the commitment. Many of these loans will be sold to third parties. Such a commitment is treated as a derivative if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding. Outstanding derivative loan commitments expose the Company to the risk that the price of the loans arising from exercise of the loan commitment might decline from inception of the loan commitment to funding of the loan due to increases in mortgage rates. To protect against this market risk, the Company utilizes forward sales commitments to economically mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the value of the loans that would result from the exercise of the loan commitments. The Company expects that these forward sales commitments will experience changes in fair value opposite to the
83
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
change in the fair value of the derivative loan commitments. The fair values of the origination and sales commitments are calculated based on changes in market interest rates after the commitment date. The notional amounts of these mortgage loan origination commitments and the related forward sales commitments were approximately $22.8 million at December 31, 2006. The fair value of the origination commitments was a gain of approximately $114,000 at December 31, 2006, which was offset by a loss of approximately $114,000 on the related sales commitments.
BancGroup has executed individual forward sales commitments related to retail mortgage loans and short-term participations in mortgage loans, which are all classified as loans held for sale. The forward sales commitments on retail mortgage loans function as an economic offset and mitigate the Companys market risk on these loans. The forward sales commitments related to the short-term participations allow BancGroup to sell the mortgage loan participations to investor institutions for an amount equal to BancGroups original acquisition cost. The Company has designated these commitments as fair value hedges of the short-term participations. The notional values of the forward sales commitments on retail mortgage loans and short-term participations at December 31, 2006 were $41.8 million and $1.4 billion, respectively. The fair value of the sales commitments related to retail mortgage loans held for sale was a gain of approximately $92,000 at December 31, 2006. The fair value of the forward sales commitments on the short-term participations was a gain of $4.5 million at December 31, 2006, which was offset by a loss of $4.5 million on the short-term participations.
Options
BancGroup occasionally enters into over-the-counter option contracts on bonds in its securities portfolio. SFAS 133 requires that the fair value of these option contracts be recorded in the financial statements. However, there were no option contracts outstanding at December 31, 2006 or 2005.
10. Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Land |
$ | 144,151 | $ | 104,333 | ||||
Bank premises |
191,203 | 183,786 | ||||||
Equipment |
155,874 | 143,291 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
56,269 | 51,316 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
40,863 | 18,643 | ||||||
Automobiles and airplane |
24,904 | 24,881 | ||||||
Total |
613,264 | 526,250 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(205,568 | ) | (186,049 | ) | ||||
Premises and equipment, net |
$ | 407,696 | $ | 340,201 | ||||
Included in the table above are assets recorded under capital leases and related accumulated amortization of $4.9 million and ($592,000) at December 31, 2006 and $3.3 million and ($142,000) at December 31, 2005, respectively.
Depreciation expense for premises and equipment amounted to $35.3 million in 2006, $31.4 million in 2005 and $26.9 million in 2004.
84
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
A summary of goodwill by reportable segment follows (in thousands):
December 31, 2004 |
Goodwill acquired |
Purchase accounting adjustments |
December 31, 2005 |
Goodwill divested |
Purchase accounting adjustments |
December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Alabama Regional Bank |
$ | 28,477 | $ | | $ | | $ | 28,477 | $ | | $ | | $ | 28,477 | ||||||||
Florida Regional Bank |
234,265 | 282,400 | 477 | 517,142 | | 251 | 517,393 | |||||||||||||||
Georgia Regional Bank |
5,491 | | | 5,491 | | | 5,491 | |||||||||||||||
Nevada Regional Bank |
15,745 | | | 15,745 | | | 15,745 | |||||||||||||||
Texas Regional Bank |
60,101 | | | 60,101 | | | 60,101 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate/Treasury/Other |
8,457 | | | 8,457 | (8,457 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 352,536 | $ | 282,400 | $ | 477 | $ | 635,413 | $ | (8,457 | ) | $ | 251 | $ | 627,207 | |||||||
Goodwill divested in 2006 is related to the sale of BancGroups ownership interest in Goldleaf Technologies, Inc. in January of 2006. Purchase accounting adjustments recorded during 2006 are related to refinement of original estimates recorded for the acquisition of FFLC.
BancGroup has finite-lived intangible assets capitalized on its balance sheet in the form of core deposits and other intangibles. Amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Core deposits |
||||||||
Gross carrying amount |
$ | 84,129 | $ | 84,129 | ||||
Less: accumulated amortization |
(37,003 | ) | (24,799 | ) | ||||
Net carrying amount |
47,126 | 59,330 | ||||||
Other intangibles |
||||||||
Gross carrying amount |
| 587 | ||||||
Less: accumulated amortization |
| (318 | ) | |||||
Net carrying amount |
| 269 | ||||||
Total finite-lived intangibles |
||||||||
Gross carrying amount |
84,129 | 84,716 | ||||||
Less: accumulated amortization |
(37,003 | ) | (25,117 | ) | ||||
Net carrying amount |
$ | 47,126 | $ | 59,599 | ||||
Amortization expense on finite-lived intangible assets totaled $12.2 million, $11.5 million and $6.4 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Aggregate annual amortization expense of currently recorded core deposit intangibles is expected to be approximately $12.2 million for both 2007 and 2008, approximately $12.1 million for 2009, approximately $6.9 million for 2010 and approximately $3.5 million for 2011.
85
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
12. Time Deposits
Certificates of deposit of less than $100,000 totaled $3.7 billion at December 31, 2006, while certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more totaled $2.9 billion. Other time deposits, which consist primarily of IRAs, totaled $476 million. At December 31, 2006, the scheduled maturities of time deposits were as follows:
(In thousands) | |||
2007 |
$ | 6,400,544 | |
2008 |
261,119 | ||
2009 |
156,448 | ||
2010 |
59,044 | ||
2011 |
21,664 | ||
Thereafter |
99,572 | ||
Total |
$ | 6,998,391 | |
13. Short-Term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings are summarized as follows:
December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
$ | 1,133,000 | $ | 673,925 | ||
Repurchase agreements (retail) |
532,672 | 568,871 | ||||
Repurchase agreements (wholesale) |
300,000 | 300,000 | ||||
Total |
$ | 1,965,672 | $ | 1,542,796 | ||
Securities with a carrying value of $995 million and $1.1 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were pledged as collateral for these repurchase agreements.
14. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt is summarized as follows:
December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Variable rate subordinated debentures |
$ | 7,725 | $ | 7,725 | ||
Subordinated notes |
376,114 | 383,622 | ||||
Junior subordinated debt |
299,078 | 307,446 | ||||
FHLB borrowings |
1,835,229 | 1,634,989 | ||||
Capital lease obligations |
4,128 | 3,119 | ||||
Other |
| 1,930 | ||||
Total |
$ | 2,522,274 | $ | 2,338,831 | ||
In connection with the ASB Bancshares, Inc. acquisition on February 5, 1998, BancGroup issued $7,725,000 of variable rate subordinated debentures due February 5, 2008 (1998 Debentures). These variable rate subordinated debentures bear interest equal to the New York Prime Rate minus 1% (but in no event less than 7% per annum).
86
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On March 15, 1999, Colonial issued $100 million of subordinated notes, due March 15, 2009, of which $56.7 million was outstanding at December 31, 2006. The notes qualify as Tier II capital, bear interest at 8.00% and are not subject to redemption prior to maturity.
On May 23, 2001, Colonial issued $150 million in 9.375% subordinated notes due June 1, 2011, of which $56.8 million was outstanding at December 31, 2006. This debt qualifies as Tier II capital. In connection with this issuance, Colonial executed an interest rate swap whereby Colonial will receive a fixed rate and pay a floating rate, effectively converting the fixed rate notes to floating. The result of this interest rate swap created an effective floating rate of 3-month LIBOR plus 3.2775%.
Effective December 7, 2005, Colonial issued $125 million in new subordinated notes and exchanged $43.3 million of the March 1999 subordinated notes and $93.2 million of the May 2001 subordinated notes for new subordinated notes. The new notes are due December 1, 2015 and bear interest at 6.375%. Concurrent with this exchange, Colonial partially terminated the interest rate swaps on the original subordinated notes in an amount equal to the principal value of the notes exchanged. Colonial executed four interest rate swaps effectively converting the fixed rate on the new notes to an effective floating rate of 3-month LIBOR plus 1.3771%.
On January 29, 1997, Colonial issued, through a special purpose trust, $70 million of trust preferred securities, representing $72 million in junior subordinated debt, that qualify as Tier I capital. The securities bear interest at 8.92% and are subject to redemption by Colonial, in whole or in part, at any time on or after January 29, 2007 until maturity in January 2027. On February 2, 2007 Colonial redeemed these trust preferred securities. Refer to Note 26, Subsequent Events, for additional information.
On March 21, 2002, Colonial issued, through a special purpose trust, $100 million of trust preferred securities, representing $103 million in junior subordinated debt, that qualify as Tier I capital. The securities bear interest at 8.32% and are subject to redemption by Colonial, in whole or in part, at any time on or after April 1, 2007 until maturity in April 2032.
On September 16, 2003, Colonial issued, through a special purpose trust, $100 million of trust preferred securities, representing $103 million in junior subordinated debt, that qualify as Tier I capital. The securities bear interest at 7.875% and are subject to redemption by Colonial, in whole or in part, at any time on or after October 1, 2008 until maturity in October 2033.
In May 2004, Colonial added $15 million in trust preferred securities, representing $15 million in junior subordinated debt, as part of the acquisition of P.C.B. Bancorp, Inc. These securities qualify as Tier I capital and bear interest at average rates of 3-month LIBOR plus 3.40% on $10 million and 3-month LIBOR plus 3.15% on $5 million. Colonial may redeem $10 million, in whole or in part, on any March 26, June 26, September 26 or December 26 on or after September 26, 2007 until maturity in September 2032. Colonial may redeem $5 million, in whole or in part, on any March 26, June 26, September 26 or December 26 on or after March 26, 2008 until maturity in March 2033.
In May 2005, Colonial added $5 million in trust preferred securities, representing $5 million in junior subordinated debt, as part of the acquisition of FFLC Bancorp, Inc. These securities qualify as Tier I capital and bear interest at a rate of 3-month LIBOR plus 3.40%. The securities are subject to redemption by Colonial, in whole or in part, on any March 26, June 26, September 26 or December 26 on or after September 26, 2007 until maturity in September 2032.
The subordinated debentures, notes, trust preferred securities and junior subordinated debt described above are subordinate to substantially all remaining liabilities of Colonial.
87
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Colonial had long-term FHLB borrowings outstanding of $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These borrowings bear interest rates ranging from 3.33% to 5.46% and mature from 2007 to 2026. FHLB credit availability at December 31, 2006 was $1.3 billion based on current collateral, which consists of 1-4 family residential, commercial real estate, home equity lines of credit, and second mortgage loans, along with specified mortgage-backed securities.
Colonial had capital lease obligations outstanding of $4.1 million and $3.1 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These obligations bear interest at a weighted average rate of 5.6% and mature from 2007 to 2017.
The par value of long-term debt is scheduled to mature as shown in the table below. This schedule excludes all carrying value adjustments, such as purchase accounting fair value adjustments, hedge accounting fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums and discounts, that will not affect future cash payments associated with the maturity of this debt.
Parent Only | Consolidated BancGroup | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
2007 |
$ | | $ | 32,611 | ||
2008 |
| 13,089 | ||||
2009 |
7,725 | 61,814 | ||||
2010 |
| 5,118 | ||||
2011 |
| 91,803 | ||||
Thereafter |
298,971 | 2,384,317 | ||||
Total |
$ | 306,696 | $ | 2,588,752 | ||
15. Capital Stock
On July 19, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors authorized certain Company officers to purchase, on behalf of the Company, the number of shares of the Companys common stock issued under the Companys various equity-based compensation and incentive plans during 2006, and the number of shares which are likely to be issued under the plans through the termination date of the authorization, not to exceed $50 million. The program is expected to be accomplished in one or more block purchases, on the open market or otherwise at such price and on such other terms as deemed to be in the best interest of the Company. In the event that circumstances arise, including but not limited to, changes in market conditions, an unexpected need for capital, or any other events, these authorized officers are allowed to elect on behalf of the Company not to proceed with the program. This authority granted by the Board of Directors will terminate on July 19, 2008. On September 8, 2006, the Executive Committee of the Companys Board of Directors authorized an additional program to repurchase up to $100 million of the Companys common stock. This program will terminate on the earlier of its completion or September 8, 2008. As of December 31, 2006, the company has repurchased 2,046,400 shares under these programs with an average price per share of $24.89.
On June 24, 2005, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy shares of the Companys common stock at an initial cost of approximately $30 million. The treasury stock purchased on July 7, 2005 was approximately 1.4 million shares, at a price of $22.09 per share. The agreement was subject to a future contingent purchase price adjustment based on the volume weighted average price of the Companys stock over the averaging period, which began on July 1, 2005 and ended on September 26, 2005. Pursuant to EITF 99-7, Accounting for an Accelerated Share Repurchase Program, the transaction was accounted for as two separate transactions: (a) as shares of common stock acquired in a treasury stock transaction recorded on the acquisition date and (b) as a forward contract indexed to the Companys common stock. The forward contract was accounted for as
88
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
an equity instrument in accordance with EITF 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock. Subsequent to completion of the averaging period, a settlement amount was calculated based upon the difference between the volume weighted average price of the Companys shares during the averaging period and the initial purchase price. As the volume weighted average price during the averaging period exceeded the initial purchase price, the Company was required to pay a purchase price adjustment and had the option to settle in cash or in shares of its common stock. The Company paid the final settlement of approximately $1.5 million on September 30, 2005, which was recorded as an additional cost to purchase treasury stock and effectively increased the price paid per share to $23.17.
BancGroups Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 400,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock. It also authorizes the Board of Directors to issue up to 50,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $2.50, in one or more series and to fix the terms, rates, limitations, relative rights and preferences of each series. These preferred shares are available for possible future financing, acquisition transactions, capital management and other general purposes. The Company may find that it can raise needed cash with less dilution to the common shareholders by issuing preferred stock. The Company has another authorization for up to 1,000,000 preference shares with a par value of $2.50. The potential rights and privileges of the preference shareholders, including voting rights, may be determined by the Board of Directors at its discretion.
On February 24, 2005, the Company settled a forward sale agreement for 8,400,000 shares of common stock. The Company received approximately $179.8 million, or $21.40 per share, in proceeds from the purchaser in this settlement.
The Company has a dividend reinvestment and common stock purchase plan under which shareholders may automatically reinvest their cash dividends in shares of common stock as well as make optional cash purchases of common stock from $10 to $120,000 per year. The total number of shares authorized for issuance under this plan is 2,000,000. As of December 31, 2006, 1,884,927 shares have been acquired through participation in the plan.
16. Regulatory Matters and Restrictions
Dividends payable by national and state banks in any year, without prior approval of the appropriate regulatory authorities, are limited to the banks net profits (as defined) for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years. Under these limitations, approximately $17.9 million of retained earnings plus certain 2007 earnings would be available for distribution to BancGroup, from its subsidiaries, as dividends in 2007 without prior approval from the respective regulatory authorities.
Colonial Bank is required to maintain reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank based on a percentage of deposits reduced by its cash on hand. The average amount of those reserves was approximately $3.5 million and $8.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
BancGroup and Colonial Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on BancGroups financial position. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
89
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
corrective action, BancGroup and Colonial Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. BancGroups and Colonial Banks capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require BancGroup and Colonial Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, that BancGroup and Colonial Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
90
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
At December 31, 2006, Colonial Bank was well-capitalized as defined by federal banking regulators. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Colonial Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below, and also must not be subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive issued by federal banking regulators. There are no conditions or events since December 31, 2006 that management believes have changed the designation. Actual capital amounts and ratios for BancGroup and Colonial Bank are also presented in the following table:
Actual | To Be Adequately |
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions |
||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio(1) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 2,232,613 | 11.77 | % | $ | 1,516,869 | ³ | 8.0 | % | |||||||||||
Colonial Bank |
2,043,522 | 10.75 | 1,521,155 | ³ | 8.0 | $ | 1,901,444 | ³ | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||
Tier I Capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
1,724,140 | 9.09 | 758,435 | ³ | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||
Colonial Bank |
1,536,594 | 8.08 | 760,578 | ³ | 4.0 | 1,140,867 | ³ | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
Tier I Leverage (to average assets)(2) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
1,724,140 | 7.81 | 883,328 | ³ | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||
Colonial Bank |
1,536,594 | 6.97 | 882,316 | ³ | 4.0 | 1,102,895 | ³ | 5.0 | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 2,119,530 | 12.17 | % | $ | 1,393,010 | ³ | 8.0 | % | |||||||||||
Colonial Bank |
2,042,706 | 11.73 | 1,393,475 | ³ | 8.0 | $ | 1,741,843 | ³ | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||
Tier I Capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
1,592,411 | 9.15 | 696,505 | ³ | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||
Colonial Bank |
1,518,677 | 8.72 | 696,737 | ³ | 4.0 | 1,045,106 | ³ | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
Tier I Leverage (to average assets)(2) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
1,592,411 | 7.77 | 820,189 | ³ | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||
Colonial Bank |
1,518,677 | 7.42 | 819,062 | ³ | 4.0 | 1,023,828 | ³ | 5.0 |
(1) | These ratios are subject to regulatory review. |
(2) | The leverage ratio consists of Tier I Capital divided by quarterly average assets, as adjusted for regulatory purposes. |
17. Employee Benefit Plans
BancGroup and subsidiaries sponsor a pension plan that covers most employees who have met certain age and length of service requirements. The plan provides benefits based on final average earnings, covered compensation, and years of benefit service. On December 31, 2005, BancGroup closed the pension plan to new employees and set the compensation amount and years of service for the future benefits calculation for participants. Actuarial computations for financial reporting purposes are based on the projected unit credit method. The measurement date is December 31. Based on current actuarial projections, BancGroup will not be required to make a contribution to the plan in 2007.
91
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Employee pension benefit plan status at December 31:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Change in benefit obligation: |
||||||||
Benefit obligation at January 1 |
$ | 62,551 | $ | 69,437 | ||||
Service cost |
| 6,948 | ||||||
Interest cost |
3,584 | 4,387 | ||||||
Actuarial (gain) loss |
(1,981 | ) | 4,426 | |||||
Curtailments |
| (20,768 | ) | |||||
Benefits paid |
(1,731 | ) | (1,879 | ) | ||||
Benefit obligation at December 31 |
62,423 | 62,551 | ||||||
Change in plan assets: |
||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at January 1 |
60,723 | 58,467 | ||||||
Actual return on plan assets |
6,007 | 4,135 | ||||||
Employer contributions |
1,900 | | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(1,731 | ) | (1,879 | ) | ||||
Fair value of plan assets at December 31 |
66,899 | 60,723 | ||||||
Funded status at December 31 |
4,476 | (1,828 | ) | |||||
Unrecognized net actuarial loss |
N/A | 2,250 | ||||||
Unamortized prior service cost |
N/A | | ||||||
Prepaid benefit at December 31 |
$ | 4,476 | $ | 422 | ||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost for the year ended December 31: |
||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | | $ | 6,948 | $ | 5,650 | ||||||
Interest cost |
3,584 | 4,387 | 3,783 | |||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(5,095 | ) | (4,920 | ) | (4,038 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of net transition asset |
| | (5 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| 9 | 9 | |||||||||
Recognition of net actuarial loss |
| 1,017 | 800 | |||||||||
Curtailment charge |
| 56 | | |||||||||
Net annual (benefit) cost |
$ | (1,511 | ) | $ | 7,497 | $ | 6,199 | |||||
The accumulated benefit obligation for the plan was approximately $62.4 million and $62.6 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
2006 | 2005 | |||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31 |
||||||
Discount rate |
6.00 | % | 5.70 | % | ||
Rate of compensation increase |
N/A | N/A | ||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended December 31 |
||||||
Discount rate |
5.70 | % | 5.75 | % | ||
Expected return on plan assets |
8.50 | 8.50 | ||||
Rate of compensation increase |
N/A | 4.00 |
92
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As a result of adopting SFAS 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, on December 31, 2006, BancGroup recognized an increase of $641,000 to the balance of its pension asset, which was offset by adjustments of $423,000 to accumulated other comprehensive income and $218,000 to deferred taxes. The Company does not expect any of the amount in accumulated other comprehensive income to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost during 2007.
Assumptions used in determining the projected benefit obligation for the pension plan are determined by the Company in consultation with its outside actuary. Assumptions, such as the discount rate, are evaluated and updated at least annually. According to SFAS 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions, the discount rate should reflect the rate at which pension obligations could be settled. SFAS 87 further states that employers may look to rates of return on high-quality fixed income investments currently available and expected to be available during the period to maturity of the pension benefits. This requirement calls for plan sponsors to match their plans cash flows to yields on bonds at consistent maturity dates.
Using an actuarial valuation tool, forecasts of benefit payments for the pension plan were developed taking into account a variety of factors, including assumptions with regard to retirement, death, termination and disability. In forecasting the plans benefit payments, participants accrued service and pay were frozen as of the valuation date. The plans actual cash flow timing was taken into account and the projected benefit payments were matched to coupon payments underlying a yield curve representing available bonds in the marketplace as of the measurement date. The yield curve was based on an actual portfolio of nearly 700 Aa-graded corporate bonds representing the majority of such bonds available in the marketplace. All bonds were U.S. issues, non-callable or callable with make whole provisions, with a minimum outstanding value of $50 million. This approach utilized a large portfolio of bonds, which is indicative of the broad bond market and less subject to volatility due to changes in the measurement approach underlying a bond index. Based on the result of this analysis, the Company utilized a discount rate of 6.00% to determine benefit obligations at December 31, 2006.
The expected return on plan assets was developed through analysis of historical market returns, current market conditions, and the funds past experience. The historical returns of asset categories as weighted by the target allocation would produce an expected return of 8.96%, as follows:
Target Allocation |
15-year Annualized |
Historical Return Weighted Average |
|||||||
U.S. equity |
55 | % | 10.71 | % | 5.89 | % | |||
International equity |
10 | % | 7.86 | % | 0.79 | % | |||
Fixed income |
35 | % | 6.50 | % | 2.28 | % | |||
Cash and cash equivalents |
0 | % | 4.00 | % | 0.00 | % | |||
Total portfolio |
100 | % | 8.96 | % | |||||
The Companys estimates of future market returns by asset category are lower than actual long-term historical returns due to inherent uncertainties in future performance.
93
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The pension plans weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2006, and 2005, by asset category are as follows:
Percentage of Plan Assets at December 31, |
||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||
U.S. equity |
64 | % | 62 | % | ||
International equity |
11 | % | 10 | % | ||
Fixed income |
25 | % | 27 | % | ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
0 | % | 1 | % | ||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
The pension plan seeks to grow the plan assets in relation to the benefit obligations to participants and beneficiaries, while prudently managing the risk of a decrease in the plan assets relative to those liabilities. The Benefits Administration Committee maintains the fund in compliance with all applicable laws governing the operation of pension plans, including ERISA and its fiduciary standards.
The assets of the Plan are invested in a broadly diversified portfolio that includes the following asset classes in the respective allocation levels:
Minimum | Maximum | |||||
U.S. equity |
35 | % | 75 | % | ||
International equity |
0 | % | 10 | % | ||
Fixed income |
25 | % | 45 | % | ||
Real estate |
0 | % | 10 | % | ||
Alternative investment |
0 | % | 5 | % | ||
Cash |
0 | % | 10 | % |
BancGroup common stock may be included in the U.S. equity allocation up to a maximum of 10% of the fund.
At both December 31, 2006 and 2005, plan assets included 164,520 shares of BancGroup common stock with market values of $4,234,745 (6% of total plan assets) and $3,918,866 (7% of total plan assets), respectively. Dividends paid to the plan on the BancGroup common stock totaled $111,873 and $100,357 during 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Investments are selected and monitored for the objective of earning a long-term total return equal to or greater than selected benchmarks over the full business cycle.
Permitted equity investments include listed publicly traded securities of domestic and foreign corporations. Permitted fixed income securities include obligations of the U.S. government or its agencies, and U.S. and foreign issuers. Mutual funds may be used, provided the underlying investments are consistent with Plan policies.
94
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following benefits are expected to be paid in future years. The expected benefits were estimated based on the same assumptions used to measure the Companys benefit obligation at December 31, 2006:
Year |
Expected Benefits | ||
(In thousands) | |||
2007 |
$ | 1,697 | |
2008 |
1,875 | ||
2009 |
2,030 | ||
2010 |
2,213 | ||
2011 |
2,411 | ||
2012-2016 |
16,197 |
BancGroup also has a 401(k) savings plan (the Plan) for all of the employees of BancGroup and its subsidiaries. The Plan provides certain retirement, death, disability and employment benefits to all eligible employees and qualifies as a deferred arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participants in the Plan make contributions through payroll deduction. BancGroup contributes a minimum of 50% of the basic contributions made by the employees and may make an additional contribution from profits on an annual basis. During 2006, BancGroup contributed 2.5% of employees eligible compensation as profit sharing. During 2005 and 2004 there were no additional contributions paid. An employees interest in BancGroups contributions becomes 100% vested after five years of service with the Company. Participants have options as to the investment of their Plan funds, one of which includes purchase of BancGroup common stock. Management does not encourage employees to elect the purchase of BancGroup common stock. The purchase of BancGroup common stock is merely one of many investment options available to employees. Charges to operations for this plan amounted to approximately $9.4 million, $3.4 million and $2.8 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
18. Stock Plans
The Company has a long-term incentive compensation plan which permits the granting of various types of incentive stock-based awards including stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and performance units, all of which may be issued only to key employees, officers and directors of BancGroup. A total of 10,000,000 shares of BancGroup common stock are authorized to be issued under the plan. As of December 31, 2006, 6,470,538 shares remain eligible to be granted under the plan. The terms of the plan stipulate that the exercise price of incentive stock options may not be less than the fair market value of BancGroup common stock on the date they are granted, and the exercise price of nonqualified stock options may not be less than 85% of the fair market value of BancGroup common stock on the date of grant. All options expire on the earlier of ten years from the date of grant, or three months after an employees termination. Options generally become exercisable on a pro-rata basis over a period of five years. Restricted stock awards typically vest over a five-year period unless they are subject to specific performance criteria. There have been no stock appreciation rights or performance units granted under the plan.
Prior to the long-term incentive plan that is currently in place, the Company had other incentive plans which permitted the granting of various types of stock-based awards. The awards granted under those plans may still be exercised, however no new awards may be granted. As of December 31, 2006, there were 1,158,685 stock options still outstanding from those plans.
Pursuant to various business combinations, BancGroup has assumed incentive and nonqualified stock options according to the respective exchange ratios.
95
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes BancGroups stock option activity since December 31, 2005:
Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
3,595,362 | $ | 14.92 | |||
Granted |
634,414 | 25.29 | ||||
Exercised |
(490,092 | ) | 11.62 | |||
Cancelled |
(143,800 | ) | 18.11 | |||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
3,595,884 | $ | 17.08 | |||
The following table provides additional information about BancGroups stock-based awards:
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(In thousands, except weighted average per share amounts) | |||||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted |
$ | 5.58 | $ | 4.95 | $ | 4.36 | |||
Weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock granted |
25.42 | 20.65 | | ||||||
Total intrinsic value of options exercised |
6,576 | 7,246 | 7,056 | ||||||
Total fair value of options vested |
913 | 1,425 | 1,314 | ||||||
Total fair value of restricted stock vested |
308 | 586 | 898 |
As of December 31, 2006 | |||||||||
Total Options Outstanding |
Options Fully Vested and Expected to Vest |
Options Fully Vested and Exercisable | |||||||
Number |
3,595,884 | 2,818,633 | 2,128,170 | ||||||
Weighted average exercise price |
$ | 17.08 | $ | 15.97 | $ | 13.48 | |||
Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands) |
$ | 31,157 | $ | 27,529 | $ | 26,083 | |||
Weighted average remaining contractual life |
6.32 years | 5.82 years | 4.83 years |
The following table summarizes BancGroups restricted stock activity since December 31, 2005:
Restricted Stock |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2005 |
387,633 | $ | 20.22 | |||
Granted |
105,899 | 25.42 | ||||
Vested |
(19,136 | ) | 16.08 | |||
Cancelled |
(7,557 | ) | 12.45 | |||
Nonvested at December 31, 2006 |
466,839 | $ | 21.70 | |||
As of December 31, 2006, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards of stock option and restricted stock not yet expensed was $9.5 million. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years.
The Company received $5.7 million in cash from the exercise of stock options during 2006. Windfall tax benefits realized during 2006 related to the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock were $1.1 million and are included as an increase to shareholders equity.
The Company has a compensation plan whereby directors of BancGroup, Colonial Bank and Regional Boards may elect to receive common stock in lieu of cash director fees. The election to participate in the plan is made at the inception of the directors term for subsidiary bank directors and annually for BancGroup directors. Shares earned under the plan for regular fees are issued quarterly, while shares earned for supplemental fees are
96
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
issued annually. All shares become vested at the end of the respective plan year. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, 37,665, 49,356 and 70,770 shares of common stock were issued under the plan, representing approximately $793,000, $859,000 and $862,000 in directors fees. The plan is authorized to issue up to 1,200,000 shares of common stock, and as of December 31, 2006 had issued 1,180,975 shares of common stock.
BancGroup maintains the Employee Stock Purchase Plan which provides employees of BancGroup, who work in excess of 29 hours per week, with a convenient way to become shareholders of BancGroup. The participant authorizes a regular payroll deduction of not less than $10 and not more than 10% of salary. The participant may also contribute whole dollar amounts of not less than $100 or not more than $1,000 each month toward the purchase of the stock at market price. There are 600,000 shares authorized for issuance under this Plan. As of December 31, 2006, approximately 219,000 shares remain eligible to be issued. An additional 400,000 may be acquired from time to time on the open market for issuance under the Plan.
19. Related Parties
BancGroup and its subsidiaries pay legal fees to a law firm where one of the firms partners also serves on BancGroups Board of Directors. The total amount of legal fees paid to this firm were approximately $4.4 million, $6.0 million and $4.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Colonial Bank, N.A. subleased office space to this firm and received $87,000 in 2006, $86,000 in 2005 and $65,000 in 2004 in rental income.
As of December 31, 2006, Colonial Bank had five construction loans outstanding to real estate joint ventures in which BancGroup owns an equity interest. The maximum amounts that can be drawn on these loans totaled $59.3 million, and the maximum amount Colonial was participating in totaled $54.6 million. The outstanding balances totaled $30.2 million at December 31, 2006. The Company had two such loans at December 31, 2005 with total outstanding balances of $23.3 million.
Refer to Note 4 for information on related party loans.
20. Merger Related Expenses
The Company recognized no external merger related expenses during 2006. Merger related expenses recognized during 2005 and 2004 totaled $4.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively. These costs were comprised primarily of travel, training, marketing, retention bonuses and incremental charges related to the integration of acquired banks, such as system conversions and customer supplies.
21. Income Taxes
The components of the provision for income taxes were as follows:
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||
Currently payable |
|||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 131,745 | $ | 123,567 | $ | 87,881 | |||||
State |
2,994 | 1,765 | 3,952 | ||||||||
Deferred |
2,194 | (10,729 | ) | (2,904 | ) | ||||||
Total |
$ | 136,933 | $ | 114,603 | $ | 88,929 | |||||
97
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The reasons for the difference between income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes are as follows:
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Tax at statutory rate on pre-tax income |
$ | 140,961 | $ | 120,087 | $ | 91,586 | ||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||
Tax-exempt income |
(7,034 | ) | (6,257 | ) | (5,282 | ) | ||||||
Other |
3,006 | 773 | 2,625 | |||||||||
Total income taxes |
$ | 136,933 | $ | 114,603 | $ | 88,929 | ||||||
The components of BancGroups net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
2006 | 2005 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
$ | 62,505 | $ | 60,906 | ||
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale |
18,887 | 18,594 | ||||
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedging instruments |
5,120 | 4,706 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
1,167 | 6,067 | ||||
Other |
2,084 | 12,261 | ||||
Total deferred tax asset |
89,763 | 102,534 | ||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||
Intangible assets |
22,920 | 21,646 | ||||
Fixed assets |
10,707 | 14,472 | ||||
Debt repurchase premium |
5,268 | 5,665 | ||||
Other |
2,690 | 7,499 | ||||
Total deferred tax liability |
41,585 | 49,282 | ||||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ | 48,178 | $ | 53,252 | ||
The net deferred tax asset is included as a component of accrued interest and other assets in the Consolidated Statement of Condition.
BancGroup did not establish a valuation allowance related to the net deferred tax asset due to taxes paid within the carryback period being sufficient to offset future deductions resulting from the reversal of these temporary differences.
98
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
22. Earnings Per Share
The following table reflects a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation:
Income | Shares | Per Share Amount | ||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||
2006 |
||||||||
Basic EPS |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 265,813 | 153,598 | $ | 1.73 | |||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||
Options and nonvested restricted stock |
1,212 | |||||||
Diluted EPS |
$ | 265,813 | 154,810 | $ | 1.72 | |||
2005 |
||||||||
Basic EPS |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 228,502 | 149,053 | $ | 1.53 | |||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||
Options and nonvested restricted stock |
1,737 | |||||||
Diluted EPS |
$ | 228,502 | 150,790 | $ | 1.52 | |||
2004 |
||||||||
Basic EPS |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 172,877 | 131,144 | $ | 1.32 | |||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||
Options |
1,171 | |||||||
Diluted EPS |
$ | 172,877 | 132,315 | $ | 1.31 | |||
The above calculations exclude options that could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future but were antidilutive for the periods presented. The number of such options excluded was 969,000, 230,000, and 536,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
23. Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and short-term investments For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Held to maturity securities and securities available for sale For debt securities and marketable equity securities held either to maturity or for sale, fair value equals quoted market price, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.
Loans held for sale The majority of these assets are short-term participations in pools of mortgage loans, for which fair values are calculated based on changes in market interest rates during the periods that the participations are on the balance sheet. For the remainder of these assets, the holding period is so short that the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
99
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Loans For loans, the fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.
Deposits SFAS 107 states that the fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, interest-bearing checking and savings accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand at the measurement date. The amount included for these deposits in the following table is their carrying value at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The fair value of time deposits is calculated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for comparable wholesale deposits with similar remaining maturities.
Short-term borrowings Rates currently available to BancGroup for borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value of existing borrowings by discounting future cash flows.
Long-term debt For debt securities and FHLB borrowings, fair value equals market price. If a market price is not available, fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on current rates for similar borrowing arrangements.
Derivatives Fair value is defined as the amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date. Market or dealer quotes were used to value the instruments.
Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit The value of the unrecognized financial instruments is estimated based on the related deferred fee income associated with the commitments, which is not material to BancGroups financial statements at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The estimated fair values of BancGroups financial instruments are as follows:
December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount |
Fair Value | Carrying Amount |
Fair Value | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
|||||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments |
$ | 1,048,619 | $ | 1,048,619 | $ | 1,088,493 | $ | 1,088,493 | |||||||
Securities available for sale |
3,083,614 | 3,083,614 | 2,841,404 | 2,841,404 | |||||||||||
Held to maturity securities |
1,874 | 2,007 | 2,950 | 3,126 | |||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
1,474,000 | 1,474,000 | 1,097,892 | 1,097,892 | |||||||||||
Loans |
15,478,889 | 14,899,864 | |||||||||||||
Less: allowance for loan losses |
(174,850 | ) | (171,051 | ) | |||||||||||
Loans, net |
15,304,039 | 15,281,531 | 14,728,813 | 14,691,534 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,912,146 | $ | 20,889,771 | $ | 19,759,552 | $ | 19,722,449 | |||||||
Financial liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 16,091,054 | $ | 16,078,392 | $ | 15,483,449 | $ | 15,447,772 | |||||||
Short-term borrowings |
1,965,672 | 1,965,672 | 1,542,796 | 1,542,796 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt |
2,522,273 | 2,611,424 | 2,338,831 | 2,366,755 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,578,999 | $ | 20,655,488 | $ | 19,365,076 | $ | 19,357,323 | |||||||
Derivatives |
$ | 2,887 | $ | 2,887 | $ | (16,004 | ) | $ | (16,004 | ) | |||||
100
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
24. Segment Information
The Company has six reportable segments for management reporting. Each regional bank segment consists of commercial lending and full service branches in its geographic region with its own management team. The branches provide a full range of traditional banking products as well as financial planning and mortgage banking services. The mortgage warehouse segment headquartered in Orlando, Florida provides funding to mortgage origination companies. The Company reports Corporate/Treasury/Other which includes the investment securities portfolio, nondeposit funding activities including long-term debt, short-term liquidity and balance sheet risk management including derivative hedging activities, the parent companys activities, intercompany eliminations and certain support activities not currently allocated to the aforementioned segments. In addition, Corporate/Treasury/Other includes income from bank-owned life insurance, income and expenses from various nonbank subsidiaries, joint ventures and equity investments, merger related expenses and the unallocated portion of the Companys financial planning business.
The results for these segments are based on BancGroups management reporting process, which assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each segment. Unlike financial reporting there is no authoritative guidance for management reporting equivalent to generally accepted accounting principles. Colonial uses an internal funding methodology to assign funding costs to assets and earning credits to liabilities as well as an internal capital allocation methodology with an offset in Corporate/Treasury/Other. For 2006, the provision for loan losses included in each segment was based on its actual net charge-off experience. The provision included in the mortgage warehouse segment remained consistent with the prior year. During 2005, the provision for loan losses included in each segment was based on an allocation of the Companys loan loss reserve. Certain back office support functions are allocated to each segment on the basis most applicable to the function being allocated. The management reporting process measures the performance of the defined segments based on BancGroups management structure and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial services companies. If the management structure and/or allocation process changes, allocations, transfers and assignments may change. Results for prior periods have been restated for comparability.
101
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Florida Regional Bank |
Florida Warehouse |
Alabama Regional Bank |
Georgia Regional Bank |
Nevada Regional Bank |
Texas Regional Bank |
Corporate/ Other |
Consolidated BancGroup | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income before intersegment income / expense |
$ | 360,659 | $ | 157,680 | $ | 114,957 | $ | 80,652 | $ | 52,175 | $ | 86,848 | $ | (97,704 | ) | $ | 755,267 | |||||||||||||
Intersegment interest income / expense |
277 | (91,159 | ) | 35,752 | (27,469 | ) | (4,372 | ) | (32,091 | ) | 119,062 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
360,936 | 66,521 | 150,709 | 53,183 | 47,803 | 54,757 | 21,358 | 755,267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
5,400 | (1,373 | ) | 12,056 | 86 | 156 | 691 | 5,126 | 22,142 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
61,855 | 27,375 | 45,569 | 9,520 | 6,844 | 7,915 | 30,144 | 189,222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
202,790 | 8,499 | 83,422 | 24,100 | 22,899 | 27,685 | 150,206 | 519,601 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
$ | 214,601 | $ | 86,770 | $ | 100,800 | $ | 38,517 | $ | 31,592 | $ | 34,296 | $ | (103,830 | ) | 402,746 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
136,933 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 265,813 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 10,341,439 | $ | 2,462,670 | $ | 3,979,621 | $ | 1,418,289 | $ | 965,988 | $ | 1,404,676 | $ | 2,211,566 | $ | 22,784,249 | ||||||||||||||
Total Deposits |
$ | 8,933,095 | $ | 488,812 | $ | 3,869,159 | $ | 815,275 | $ | 750,530 | $ | 721,594 | $ | 512,589 | $ | 16,091,054 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income before intersegment income / expense |
$ | 332,515 | $ | 108,154 | $ | 124,796 | $ | 68,016 | $ | 50,162 | $ | 66,254 | $ | (40,675 | ) | $ | 709,222 | |||||||||||||
Intersegment interest income / expense |
(8,764 | ) | (46,757 | ) | 27,026 | (17,362 | ) | (5,354 | ) | (19,429 | ) | 70,640 | | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
323,751 | 61,397 | 151,822 | 50,654 | 44,808 | 46,825 | 29,965 | 709,222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
9,503 | 96 | 3,574 | 601 | 1,712 | 2,330 | 9,022 | 26,838 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
51,696 | 17,925 | 81,067 | 8,697 | 6,000 | 5,091 | 5,500 | 175,976 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
182,890 | 7,077 | 87,238 | 23,452 | 20,924 | 25,629 | 168,045 | 515,255 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
$ | 183,054 | $ | 72,149 | $ | 142,077 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 28,172 | $ | 23,957 | $ | (141,602 | ) | 343,105 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
114,603 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 228,502 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 9,768,518 | $ | 2,220,584 | $ | 3,508,666 | $ | 1,325,554 | $ | 881,870 | $ | 1,253,589 | $ | 2,467,416 | $ | 21,426,197 | ||||||||||||||
Total Deposits |
$ | 8,426,998 | $ | 523,602 | $ | 3,475,808 | $ | 790,986 | $ | 684,862 | $ | 645,612 | $ | 935,581 | $ | 15,483,449 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income before intersegment income / expense |
$ | 229,894 | $ | 68,564 | $ | 117,909 | $ | 54,200 | $ | 40,933 | $ | 45,739 | $ | 10,009 | $ | 567,248 | ||||||||||||||
Intersegment interest income / expense |
14,430 | (15,686 | ) | 36,981 | (3,876 | ) | (2,864 | ) | (7,434 | ) | (21,551 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
244,324 | 52,878 | 154,890 | 50,324 | 38,069 | 38,305 | (11,542 | ) | 567,248 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
11,305 | 331 | 6,788 | 855 | 1,504 | 1,781 | 4,430 | 26,994 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
39,559 | 2,905 | 47,018 | 7,953 | 5,231 | 4,867 | 45,668 | 153,201 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
153,334 | 5,533 | 114,951 | 26,981 | 22,639 | 25,634 | 82,577 | 431,649 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
$ | 119,244 | $ | 49,919 | $ | 80,169 | $ | 30,441 | $ | 19,157 | $ | 15,757 | $ | (52,881 | ) | 261,806 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
88,929 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 172,877 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 6,731,447 | $ | 2,053,150 | $ | 3,895,614 | $ | 1,302,704 | $ | 787,735 | $ | 1,055,977 | $ | 3,069,983 | $ | 18,896,610 | ||||||||||||||
Total Deposits |
$ | 5,781,801 | $ | 283,743 | $ | 3,700,810 | $ | 767,565 | $ | 516,978 | $ | 507,841 | $ | 304,957 | $ | 11,863,695 | ||||||||||||||
102
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
25. Condensed Financial Information of the Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (Parent Company Only)
Statements of Condition
December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Assets: |
||||||
Cash |
$ | 154,146 | $ | 48,965 | ||
Investment in subsidiaries: |
||||||
Bank |
2,157,079 | 2,154,635 | ||||
Nonbank |
51,810 | 38,493 | ||||
Other assets |
13,614 | 17,826 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,376,649 | $ | 2,259,919 | ||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity: |
||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 306,803 | $ | 315,171 | ||
Other liabilities |
12,511 | 12,057 | ||||
Shareholders equity |
2,057,335 | 1,932,691 | ||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 2,376,649 | $ | 2,259,919 | ||
Statements of Income
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||
Income: |
|||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiaries: |
|||||||||||
Bank |
$ | 281,727 | $ | 224,421 | $ | 75,535 | |||||
Nonbank |
3,219 | 1,459 | 1,154 | ||||||||
Interest and dividends on short-term investments |
2,372 | 1,358 | 1,074 | ||||||||
Net cash settlement of swap derivatives |
| 8,362 | 13,337 | ||||||||
Change in fair value of swap derivatives |
| (8,550 | ) | (1,345 | ) | ||||||
Other income |
5,184 | 5,212 | 3,402 | ||||||||
Total income |
292,502 | 232,262 | 93,157 | ||||||||
Expenses: |
|||||||||||
Interest |
26,275 | 25,852 | 24,995 | ||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
2,128 | 3,230 | 2,593 | ||||||||
Occupancy expense |
243 | 254 | 341 | ||||||||
Furniture and equipment expense |
31 | 21 | 27 | ||||||||
Other expenses |
7,703 | 2,994 | 2,166 | ||||||||
Total expenses |
36,380 | 32,351 | 30,122 | ||||||||
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
256,122 | 199,911 | 63,035 | ||||||||
Income tax benefit |
9,486 | 9,150 | 4,780 | ||||||||
Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
265,608 | 209,061 | 67,815 | ||||||||
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
205 | 19,441 | 105,062 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 265,813 | $ | 228,502 | $ | 172,877 | |||||
103
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Statements of Cash Flows
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
$ | 271,563 | $ | 212,654 | $ | 74,853 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(145 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of other assets |
22 | | | |||||||||
Net cash (paid) received in acquisitions |
| (114,872 | ) | 31,312 | ||||||||
Net investment in subsidiaries |
(11,553 | ) | (214,794 | ) | (30,328 | ) | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(11,676 | ) | (329,667 | ) | 979 | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(8,247 | ) | | | ||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
9,355 | 15,965 | 8,190 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of shares under forward sales agreement |
| 179,575 | | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of treasury stock |
| | 147 | |||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(50,996 | ) | (31,510 | ) | | |||||||
Dividends paid |
(104,818 | ) | (89,702 | ) | (75,635 | ) | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(154,706 | ) | 74,328 | (67,298 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
105,181 | (42,685 | ) | 8,534 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
48,965 | 91,650 | 83,116 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 154,146 | $ | 48,965 | $ | 91,650 | ||||||
26. Subsequent Events
On February 2, 2007, Colonial redeemed $70 million of trust preferred securities, representing $72 million in junior subordinated debt. The securities bore interest at 8.92% and were subject to redemption by Colonial, in whole or in part, at any time on or after January 29, 2007 until maturity in January 2027. The securities were redeemed at a price equal to 104.46% of the principal amount of the securities, plus accrued interest up to, but not including, the redemption date.
On January 23, 2007, Colonial announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire Miami, Florida based Commercial Bankshares, Inc. (Commercial) and its subsidiary Commercial Bank of Florida. Commercial had total assets of $1 billion, total deposits of $841 million and total loans of $611 million at December 31, 2006. Commercial Bank of Florida currently operates 14 full service branches in Miami-Dade and Broward counties in South Florida. Under the terms of the agreement, Commercials shareholders will receive in the aggregate, consideration of approximately $157.5 million in cash and 6.5 million shares of Colonial stock. This transaction is expected to be completed by the end of the second quarter of 2007.
104
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures |
None
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who certify the Companys financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of Directors.
Based on their evaluation as of December 31, 2006, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and such information is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006. Our managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2006 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. | Other Information |
None.
105
PART III
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
The information required by this item as to BancGroups directors will be contained in BancGroups proxy statement that will be prepared and filed for BancGroups 2007 annual meeting of shareholders, under the captions Election of Directors and Section 16 (a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, and is incorporated herein by reference.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Name, Age and Year Became Executive Officer |
Position and Offices Held with BancGroup and Colonial Bank |
Present and Principal Occupation for the Last Five Years | ||
Robert E. Lowder 64, 1981 |
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, BancGroup and Colonial Bank. | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, BancGroup and Colonial Bank since 1981, also President of BancGroup and Colonial Bank from 1981 to 2003 and since 2005. | ||
Sarah H. Moore 41, 1999 |
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, BancGroup and Colonial Bank. | Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, BancGroup and Colonial Bank since July 2005; Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, BancGroup and Colonial Bank November 2005-March 2006; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, BancGroup and Colonial Bank 2003-July 2005; Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer, BancGroup and Colonial Bank 2000-2003. | ||
Caryn Cope 43, 2001 |
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, BancGroup and Colonial Bank. | Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer BancGroup and Colonial Bank since July 2005; Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, BancGroup and Colonial Bank, 2001-July 2005. |
106
Name, Age and Year Became Executive Officer |
Position and Offices Held with BancGroup and Colonial Bank |
Present and Principal Occupation for the Last Five Years | ||
Patti G. Hill 48, 2004 |
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, BancGroup and Colonial Bank. | Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, BancGroup and Colonial Bank since November 2005; Senior Executive Vice President, Retail Banking, BancGroup and Colonial Bank, July 2005-November 2005; Executive Vice President, Retail Banking, BancGroup and Colonial Bank, 2004-July 2005; President and Chief Executive Officer, Alabama Retail Banking, Colonial Bank, May 2004-November 2005; President and CEO, Colonial Bank Retail Banking of South Alabama, October 2003-May 2004; President and CEO, Gulf Coast Region, July 1998-October 2003. | ||
Linda L. Green 55, 2004 |
Executive Vice President Wealth Management, BancGroup and Colonial Bank. | Executive Vice President Wealth Management, BancGroup and Colonial Bank, 2004-present; Chief Executive Officer, North Alabama Region of Colonial Bank, 2003-2004; Chief Executive Officer of Northern Region of Colonial Bank, 2000-2004. | ||
David B. Byrne, Jr. 65, 2006 |
Executive Vice President General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, BancGroup and Colonial Bank |
Executive Vice President General Counsel, BancGroup and Colonial Bank, and Corporate Secretary, Colonial Bank since November 2006; Executive Vice President General Counsel, BancGroup and Colonial Bank, January 2006-November 2006; Shareholder, Capell & Howard, P.C., (law offices) 2000-2005; Shareholder, Robison & Belser, P.A., (law offices) 1975-2000. |
BancGroup has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. A copy of the code of ethics and the form of such officers agreement to the code of ethics was filed as Exhibit 14 to BancGroups Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
BancGroups common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). In accordance with NYSE listing qualifications, BancGroups Chief Executive Officer must certify each year that he is not aware of any violation by BancGroup of NYSE corporate governance listing standards as of the date of the certification (with such qualifications as may be necessary). This certification was submitted to the NYSE by BancGroups
107
Chief Executive Officer (with no qualifications) within 30 days of the last annual meeting of BancGroups shareholders. This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 certifications regarding the quality of BancGroups public disclosure.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
The information required by this item will be contained in the proxy statement prepared and filed for BancGroups 2007 annual meeting of shareholders, under the caption Compensation Discussion and Analysis and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters |
The information required by this item will be contained in the proxy statement prepared and filed for BancGroups 2007 annual meeting of shareholders, under the caption Voting Securities and Principal Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
The information required by this item will be contained in the proxy statement prepared and filed for BancGroups 2007 annual meeting of shareholders, under the captions Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation and Compensation Discussion and Analysis and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
The information required by this item will be contained in the proxy statement prepared and filed for BancGroups 2007 annual meeting of shareholders, under the caption Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and is incorporated herein by reference.
108
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a) 1. Financial Statements
The following financial statements are included herein at Item 8.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Consolidated Statements of Condition as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, including Parent Company only information.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
The financial statement schedules required to be included pursuant to this Item are not included herein because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto which are incorporated by reference at subsection 1 of this Item, above.
3. Exhibits
Exhibits |
Description | |||
Exhibit 3 |
| Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws: | ||
3.1 |
| Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
3.2 |
| Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 21, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Exhibit 4 |
| Instruments defining the rights of security holders: | ||
4.1 |
| Article 4 of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
4.2 |
| Article II of the Bylaws of the Registrant filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 21, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
4.3 |
| Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan of Registrant dated January 15, 1986, and Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of June 10, 1986, filed as Exhibit 4(C) to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 33-07015), effective July 15, 1986, and incorporated herein by reference. |
109
Exhibits |
Description | |||
4.4 |
| All instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Not filed pursuant to clause 4(iii) of Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K, to be furnished upon request of the Commission. | ||
Exhibit 10 |
| Material Contracts: | ||
10.1 |
| The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. First Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Plan for Directors, as amended, included as Exhibit 10(C)(1) to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 33-52952), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.2 |
| The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. Stock Bonus and Retention Plan, Included as Exhibit 10(C)(2) to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 33-52952), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.3 |
| Indenture dated as of January 29, 1997 between The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Debenture Trustee, included as Exhibit 4(A) to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-22135), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.4 |
| Amended and Restated Management Incentive Plan of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.5 |
| Restated Colonial BancGroup 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan, including forms of award agreements, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.6 |
| Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 21, 2002, between The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee, the form of which is included as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-83390), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.7 |
| First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 21, 2002, between The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee, the form of which is included as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-83390), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.8 |
| Second Supplemental Indenture, dated September 16, 2003, between The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee, the form of which is included as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-108254), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.9 |
| Schedule of Directors Fees, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of February 26, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.10 |
| Form of Warehouse Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2005, among MWL Funding, Inc., as the Seller, and Colonial Bank, N.A., as the Servicer, and the persons parties thereto, as Conduit Purchasers and Committed Purchasers, and Citicorp North America, Inc. as the Program Agent and a Group Agent filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 25, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.11 |
| Form of Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Warehouse Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 29, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. |
110
Exhibits |
Description | |||
10.12 |
| Form of Omnibus Amendment, dated as of March 21, 2006, to the Warehouse Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2005, and amended as of September 29, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of March 21, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.13 |
| Form of Amendment No. 3, dated as of August 22, 2006, to the Warehouse Loan Repurchase Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2005 and amended as of September 29, 2005 and March 21, 2006, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on form 8-K, dated as of August 22, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.14 |
| Form of Warehouse Loan Sale Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2005, between Colonial Bank, N.A., as Originator, and MWL Funding, Inc., as Purchaser, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 25, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.15 |
| Colonial Bank Management Team Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of April 25, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.16 |
| Form of Director Indemnification Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of April 25, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Exhibit 11 |
| Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share are included herein at Note 22 to the financial statements in Item 8. | ||
Exhibit 12 |
| Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges. | ||
Exhibit 14 |
| Code of Ethics for Principal Financial Officers filed as Exhibit 14 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Exhibit 21 |
| List of subsidiaries of the Registrant. | ||
Exhibit 23 |
| Consents of experts and counsel: | ||
23.1 |
| Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. | ||
Exhibit 24 |
| Power of Attorney. | ||
Exhibit 31.1 |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | ||
Exhibit 31.2 |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer. | ||
Exhibit 32.1 |
| Section 906 Certification. | ||
Exhibit 32.2 |
| Section 906 Certification. |
111
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Montgomery, Alabama, on the 26 day of February, 2007.
THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC. | ||
By: | /s/ ROBERT E. LOWDER | |
Robert E. Lowder Its Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
/s/ ROBERT E. LOWDER Robert E. Lowder |
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President |
** | ||
/s/ SARAH H. MOORE Sarah H. Moore |
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Executive Vice President |
** | ||
/s/ T. BRENT HICKS T. Brent Hicks |
Chief Accounting Officer and Senior Vice President |
|||
* Lewis E. Beville |
Director |
** | ||
* Augustus K. Clements, III |
Director |
** | ||
* Robert S. Craft |
Director |
** | ||
* Patrick F. Dye |
Director |
** | ||
* Hubert L. Harris, Jr. |
Director |
** | ||
* Clinton O. Holdbrooks |
Director |
** | ||
* Deborah L. Linden |
Director |
** |
112
Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
* John Ed Mathison |
Director |
** | ||
* Milton E. McGregor |
Director |
** | ||
John C. H. Miller, Jr. |
Director |
|||
* Joe D. Mussafer |
Director |
** | ||
* William E. Powell, III |
Director |
** | ||
* James W. Rane |
Director |
** | ||
* Simuel Sippial |
Director |
** | ||
* Edward V. Welch |
Director |
** |
* | The undersigned, acting pursuant to a power of attorney, has signed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for and on behalf of the persons indicated above as such persons true and lawful attorney-in-fact and in their names, places and stead, in the capacities indicated above and on the date indicated below. |
/s/ SARAH H. MOORE |
Sarah H. Moore Attorney-in-Fact |
** Dated: February 26, 2007
113
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits |
Description | |||
Exhibit 3 |
| Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws: | ||
3.1 |
| Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
3.2 |
| Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 21, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Exhibit 4 |
| Instruments defining the rights of security holders: | ||
4.1 |
| Article 4 of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
4.2 |
| Article II of the Bylaws of the Registrant filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 21, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
4.3 |
| Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan of Registrant dated January 15, 1986, and Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of June 10, 1986, filed as Exhibit 4(C) to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 33-07015), effective July 15, 1986, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
4.4 |
| All instruments defining the rights of long-term debt of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Not filed pursuant to clause 4(iii) of Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K, to be furnished upon request of the Commission. | ||
Exhibit 10 |
| Material Contracts: | ||
10.1 |
| The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. First Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Plan for Directors, as amended, included as Exhibit 10(C)(1) to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 33-52952), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.2 |
| The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. Stock Bonus and Retention Plan, Included as Exhibit 10(C)(2) to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 33-52952), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.3 |
| Indenture dated as of January 29, 1997 between The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Debenture Trustee, included as Exhibit 4(A) the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-22135), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.4 |
| Amended and Restated Management Incentive Plan of The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.5 |
| Restated Colonial BancGroup 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan, including forms of award agreements, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.6 |
| Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 21, 2002, between The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee, the form of which is included as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-83390), and incorporated herein by reference. |
114
Exhibits |
Description | |||
10.7 |
| First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 21, 2002, between The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee, the form of which is included as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-83390), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.8 |
| Second Supplemental Indenture, dated September 16, 2003, between The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee, the form of which is included as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-108254), and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.9 |
| Schedule of Directors Fees, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of February 26, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.10 |
| Form of Warehouse Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2005, among MWL Funding, Inc. as the Seller, and Colonial Bank, N.A., as the Servicer, and the persons parties thereto, as Conduit Purchasers and Committed Purchasers, and Citicorp North America, Inc. as the Program Agent and a Group Agent filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 25, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.11 |
| Form of Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 29, 2005, to Warehouse Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2005, filed as Exhibits 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 29, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.12 |
| Form of Omnibus Amendment, dated as of March 21, 2006, to the Warehouse Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2005, and amended as of September 29, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of March 21, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.13 |
| Form of Amendment No. 3, dated as of August 22, 2006, to the Warehouse Loan Repurchase Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2005 and amended as of September 29, 2005 and March 21, 2006, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on form 8-K, dated as of August 22, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.14 |
| Form of Warehouse Loan Sale Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2005, between Colonial Bank, N.A., as Originator, and MWL Funding, Inc., as Purchaser, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 25, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.15 |
| Colonial Bank Management Team Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of April 25, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.16 |
| Form of Director Indemnification Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of April 25, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Exhibit 11 |
| Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share are included herein at Note 22 to the financial statements in Item 8. | ||
Exhibit 12 |
| Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges. | ||
Exhibit 14 |
| Code of Ethics for Principal Financial Officers filed as Exhibit 14 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Exhibit 21 |
| List of subsidiaries of the Registrant. | ||
Exhibit 23 |
| Consents of experts and counsel: |
115
Exhibits |
Description | |||
23.1 |
| Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. | ||
Exhibit 24 |
| Power of Attorney. | ||
Exhibit 31.1 |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | ||
Exhibit 31.2 |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer. | ||
Exhibit 32.1 |
| Section 906 Certification. | ||
Exhibit 32.2 |
| Section 906 Certification. |
116