Edgar Filing: FIRST COMMUNITY CORP /SC/

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017

o	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from ____ to ____

Commission File No. 000-28344

FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

South Carolina	57-1010751
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

5455 Sunset Boulevard, Lexington, South Carolina 29072

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(803) 951-2265

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” , and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company o
		Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: On November 6, 2017, 6,706,406 shares of the issuer’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share, were issued and outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	6
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity	7
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	8
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	42
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	61
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	61

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		62
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	62
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	62
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	62
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	62
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	62
Item 5.	Other Information	62
Item 6.	Exhibits	62

SIGNATURES		63
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EX-31.1 RULE 13A-14(A) CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
EX-31.2 RULE 13A-14(A) CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
EX-32 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except par value)	2017			December 31,
	(Unaudited)			2016
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	11,695		$	11,925
Interest-bearing bank balances		14,792			9,475
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell		601			599
Investment securities - held-to-maturity		17,057			17,193
Investment securities - available-for-sale		229,060			253,394
Other investments, at cost		2,555			1,809
Loans held for sale		6,018			5,707
Loans		568,488			546,709
Less, allowance for loan losses		5,656			5,214
Net loans		562,832			541,495
Property, furniture and equipment - net		31,343			29,833
Land held for sale		—			1,055
Bank owned life insurance		22,855			20,905
Other real estate owned		733			1,146
Intangible assets		878			1,102
Goodwill		5,078			5,078
Other assets		8,731			14,077
Total assets	$	914,228		$	914,793
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	195,348		$	182,915
Interest bearing		574,734			583,707
Total deposits		770,082			766,622
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		17,469			19,527
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		17,255			24,035
Junior subordinated debt		14,964			14,964
Other liabilities		7,863			7,784
Total liabilities		827,633			832,932
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 6,706,406 at September 30, 2017 6,708,393 at December 31, 2016		6,706			6,708
Common stock warrants issued		46			46
Nonvested restricted stock		(158	)		(220	)
Additional paid in capital		75,960			75,991
Retained earnings		4,088			573
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(47	)		(1,237	)
Total shareholders’ equity		86,595			81,861
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	914,228		$	914,793

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

	Nine			Nine
	Months Ended			Months Ended
	September 30,			September 30,
	2017			2016
(Dollars in thousands)	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	19,003		$	17,582
Taxable securities		2,924			2,903
Non-taxable securities		1,395			1,428
Other		94			83
Total interest income		23,416			21,996
Interest expense:
Deposits		1,341			1,358

Federal funds sold and securities sold under agreement to repurchase		45			32
Other borrowed money		694			941
Total interest expense		2,080			2,331
Net interest income		21,336			19,665
Provision for loan losses		360			536
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		20,976			19,129
Non-interest income:
Deposit service charges		1,047			1,064
Mortgage banking income		2,950			2,515
Investment advisory fees and non-deposit commissions		908			871
Gain on sale of securities		350			601
Gain (loss) on sale of other assets		128			(36	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(446	)		(459	)
Other		2,108			2,184
Total non-interest income		7,045			6,740
Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		12,469			11,472
Occupancy		1,598			1,601
Equipment		1,348			1,308
Marketing and public relations		615			529
FDIC assessments		234			336
Other real estate expense		75			187
Amortization of intangibles		223			243
Merger expenses		326			—
Other		4,096			3,582
Total non-interest expense		20,984			19,258
Net income before tax		7,037			6,611
Income taxes		1,724			1,721
Net income	$	5,313		$	4,890

Basic earnings per common share	$	0.80		$	0.74
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.78		$	0.72

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

	Three			Three
	Months Ended			Months Ended
	September 30,			September 30,
	2017			2016
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	6,438		$	5,977
Taxable securities		989			944
Non-taxable securities		453			445
Other		41			34
Total interest income		7,921			7,400
Interest expense:
Deposits		459			465
Federal funds sold and securities sold under agreement to repurchase		24			12
Other borrowed money		211			272
Total interest expense		694			749
Net interest income		7,227			6,651
Provision for loan losses		166			179
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		7,061			6,472
Non-interest income:
Deposit service charges		379			377
Mortgage banking income		1,032			937
Investment advisory fees and non-deposit commissions		336			283
Gain on sale of securities		124			478
Gain on sale of other assets		40			45
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(165	)		(459	)
Other		676			726
Total non-interest income		2,422			2,387
Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		4,122			3,888
Occupancy		532			531
Equipment		396			442
Marketing and public relations		96			240
FDIC assessment		78			60
Other real estate expense		19			115
Amortization of intangibles		74			80
Merger expenses		228			—
Other		1,349			1,227
Total non-interest expense		6,894			6,583
Net income before tax		2,589			2,276
Income taxes		696			599
Net income	$	1,893		$	1,677

Basic earnings per common share	$	0.28		$	0.26
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.28		$	0.25

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)	Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016
Net income	$	5,313		$	4,890

Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain during the period on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $732 and $1,085, respectively		1,421			2,106

Less: Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net income, net of taxes of $119 and $204, respectively		(231	)		(397	)

Other comprehensive income		1,190			1,709
Comprehensive income	$	6,503		$	6,599

(Dollars in thousands)	Three months ended September 30,
	2017			2016
Net income	$	1,893		$	1,677

Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain (loss) during the period on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $94 and $509, respectively		181			(989	)

Less: Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net income, net of taxes of $42 and $163, respectively		(82	)		(315	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		99			(1,304	)
Comprehensive income	$	1,992		$	373

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

Nine Months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016

(Unaudited)

(Dollars and shares in thousands)																		Accumulated
							Common		Additional			Nonvested			Retained			Other
	Shares			Common			Stock		Paid-in			Restricted			Earnings			Comprehensive
	Issued			Stock			Warrants		Capital			Stock			(Deficit)			Income (Loss)			Total
Balance, December 31, 2015		6,690		$	6,690		$	46	$	75,761		$	(297	)	$	(3,992	)	$	830		$	79,038
Net income																4,890						4,890
Other comprehensive income net of tax of $881																			1,709			1,709
Issuance of restricted stock		22			22					275			(297	)								—
Restricted shares surrendered		(26	)		(26	)				(327	)											(353	)
Issuance of common stock		1			1					13												14
Amortization compensation restricted stock													281									281
Dividends: Common ($0.24 per share)																(1,586	)					(1,586	)
Dividend reinvestment plan		16			16					199												215
Balance, September 30, 2016		6,703		$	6,703		$	46	$	75,921		$	(313	)	$	(688	)	$	2,539		$	84,208

Balance December 31, 2016		6,708		$	6,708		$	46	$	75,991		$	(220	)	$	573		$	(1,237	)	$	81,861
Net income																5,313						5,313
Other comprehensive income net of tax of $613																			1,190			1,190
Issuance of restricted stock		5			5					100			(105	)								—
Shares forfeited		(2	)		(2	)				(27	)		9									(20	)
Shares retired		(19	)		(19	)				(369	)											(388	)
Amortization compensation restricted stock													158									158
Dividends: Common ($0.27 per share)																(1,798	)					(1,798	)
Dividend reinvestment plan		14			14					265												279
Balance, September 30, 2017		6,706		$	6,706		$	46	$	75,960		$	(158	)	$	4,088		$	(47	)	$	86,595

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine months ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	5,313		$	4,890
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operating activities:
Depreciation		1,075			994
Premium amortization		2,449			3,044
Provision for loan losses		360			536
Write-down of other real estate owned		17			76
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate owned		(128	)		36
Origination of loans held-for-sale		(80,340	)		(71,169	)
Sale of loans held-for-sale		80,029			69,880
Amortization of intangibles		223			243
Accretion on acquired loans		(138	)		(804	)
Writedown of land held for sale		90			25
Gain on sale of securities		(350	)		(601	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		446			459
Decrease in other assets		4,042			343
Increase in other liabilities		78			144
Net cash provided from operating activities		13,166			8,096
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale		(15,350	)		(64,059	)
Maturity/call of investment securities available-for-sale		25,761			26,553
Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale		12,867			33,215
Proceeds from sale of other securities		357			486
Increase in loans		(21,787	)		(34,052	)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		530			1,597
Purchase of property and equipment		(2,675	)		(1,016	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(297	)		(37,275	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Increase in deposit accounts		3,473			49,711
Increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase		(2,058	)		1,199
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		26,000			70,593
Repayment of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(33,268	)		(74,860	)
Issuance of common stock		—			14
Shares forfeited		(20	)		—
Shares retired		(388	)		(353	)
Dividends paid: Common Stock		(1,798	)		(1,586	)
Dividend reinvestment plan		279			215
Net cash (used) provided from financing activities		(7,780	)		44,933
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		5,089			15,754
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		21,999			22,941
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	27,088		$	38,695
Supplemental disclosure:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	2,162		$	2,395
Income taxes	$	1,095		$	1,345
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Unrealized gain on securities, net of tax	$	1,190		$	1,709
Transfer of loans to foreclosed property	$	26		$	450

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and the cash flows of First Community Corporation (the “Company”), present fairly in all material respects the Company’s financial position at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and the Company’s results of operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to fairly present the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are presented in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q. The information included in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K should be referred to in connection with these unaudited interim financial statements.

Note 2 – Earnings Per Common Share

The following reconciles the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per common share computation:

(In thousands except average market price)
	Nine months				Three months
	Ended September 30,				Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016

Numerator (Net income)	$	5,313	$	4,890	$	1,893	$	1,677
Denominator
Weighted average common shares outstanding for:
Basic earnings per share		6,666		6,583		6,666		6,584
Dilutive securities:
Deferred compensation		54		39		54		38
Warrants/Restricted stock – Treasury stock method
		88		152		88		147
Diluted earnings per share		6,808		6,774		6,808		6,769
The average market price used in calculating assumed number of shares	$	20.59	$	14.29	$	20.66	$	14.00

There were no options outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and 2016.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we issued $2.5 million in 8.75% subordinated notes maturing December 16, 2019. On November 15, 2012, the subordinated notes were redeemed in full at par. Warrants for 107,500 shares of common stock at $5.90 per share were issued in connection with the issuance of the subordinated debt. There were 97,180 warrants outstanding at September 30, 2017. These warrants expire December 16, 2019 and are included in dilutive securities in the table above.

The Company has issued a total of 138,000 shares of restricted stock under the terms of its compensation plans and employment agreements. The employee shares cliff vest over a three year period; the non-employee director shares vest one year after issuance. The unrecognized compensation cost at September 30, 2017 for non-vested shares amounts to $158 thousand. In February 2017, the Company issued 353 restricted stock units to an employee that cliff vest over three years. Each unit is convertible into one share of common stock at the time the units vest. The related compensation cost is accrued over the vesting period.

In 2006, the Company established a Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan, whereby a director may elect to defer all or any part of annual retainer and monthly meeting fees payable with respect to service on the board of directors or a committee of the board. Units of common stock are credited to the director’s account at the time compensation is earned and are included in dilutive securities in the table above. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were 108,577 and 101,888 units in the plan, respectively. The accrued liability at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 amounted to $1.1 million and $966 thousand, respectively, and is included in “Other liabilities” on the balance sheet.

Note 3—Investment Securities-continued

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities are summarized below:

AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
September 30, 2017
US Treasury securities	$	1,531	$	—	$	10	$	1,521
Government sponsored enterprises		959		37		—		996
Mortgage-backed securities		124,437		459		1,148		123,748
Small Business Administration pools		50,653		189		477		50,365
State and local government		50,738		1,419		583		51,574
Corporate and other securities		932		—		76		856
	$	229,250	$	2,104	$	2,294	$	229,060

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
December 31, 2016
US Treasury securities	$	1,538	$	—	$	18	$	1,520
Government sponsored enterprises		959		38		—		997
Mortgage-backed securities		145,696		480		1,878		144,298
Small Business Administration pools		50,560		208		584		50,184
State and local government		54,702		907		1,075		54,534
Corporate and other securities		1,932		—		71		1,861
	$	255,387	$	1,633	$	3,626	$	253,394

Note 3—Investment Securities-continued

HELD-TO-MATURITY:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
September 30, 2017
State and local government	$	17,057	$	289	$	2	$	17,344
	$	17,057	$	289	$	2	$	17,344

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
December 31, 2016
State and local government	$	17,193	$	54	$	133	$	17,114
	$	17,193	$	54	$	133	$	17,114

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company received proceeds of $12.9 million and $33.2 million, respectively, from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, gross realized gains totaled $371 thousand and gross realized losses totaled $21 thousand. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, gross realized gains totaled $601 thousand and there were no gross realized losses. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company received proceeds of $2.3 million from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale, gross realized gains totaled $125 thousand and there were no gross realized losses. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company received proceeds of $19.1 million from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale, gross realized gains totaled $478 thousand and there were no gross realized losses.

At September 30, 2017, corporate and other securities available-for-sale included the following at fair value: mutual funds at $795.8 thousand and foreign debt of $60.0 thousand. At December 31, 2016, corporate and other securities available-for-sale included the following at fair value: mutual funds at $801.1 thousand, foreign debt of $60.1 thousand, and corporate preferred stock in the amount of $1.0 million. Other investments, at cost, include Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock in the amount of $1.6 million and corporate stock in the amount of $1.0 million at September 30, 2017. The Company held $1.8 million of FHLB stock at December 31, 2016.

Note 3—Investment Securities – continued

The following tables show gross unrealized losses and fair values, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

(Dollars in thousands)	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
September 30, 2017			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
Available-for-sale securities:	Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss

US Treasury securities	$	1,521	$	10	$	—	$	—	$	1,521	$	10
Government Sponsored Enterprise mortgage-backed securities		28,950		219		37,271		929		66,221		1,148
Small Business Administration pools		14,931		100		23,307		377		38,238		477
State and local government		884		10		12,341		573		13,225		583
Corporate and other securities		—		—		796		76		796		76
	$	46,286	$	339	$	73,715	$	1,955	$	120,001	$	2,294

(Dollars in thousands)	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
September 30, 2017			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
Held-to-maturity securities:	Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss
State and local government	$	680	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	680	$	2

Note 3—Investment Securities – continued

(Dollars in thousands)	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
December 31, 2016			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
Available-for-sale securities:	Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss

US Treasury securities	$	1,520	$	18	$	—	$	—	$	1,520	$	18
Government Sponsored Enterprise mortgage-backed securities		77,389		1,597		16,655		281		94,044		1,878
Small Business Administration pools		15,213		206		23,382		378		38,595		584
State and local government		17,502		1,075		—		—		17,502		1,075
Corporate and other securities		—		—		801		71		801		71
	$	111,624	$	2,896	$	40,838	$	730	$	152,462	$	3,626

(Dollars in thousands)	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
December 31, 2016			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
Held-to-maturity securities:	Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss
State and local government	$	10,245	$	133	$	—	$	—	$	10,245	$	133

Government Sponsored Enterprise, Mortgage-Backed Securities: The Company owned mortgage-backed securities (“MBSs”), including collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), issued by government sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”) with an amortized cost of $124.2 million and $145.3 million and approximate fair value of $123.5 million and $143.9 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, all of the MBSs issued by GSEs were classified as “Available for Sale.” Unrealized losses on certain of these investments are not considered to be “other than temporary,” and we have the intent and ability to hold these until they mature or recover the current book value. The contractual cash flows of the investments are guaranteed by the GSE. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the Company’s investment. Because the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not the Company will not be required to sell these securities before a recovery of its amortized cost, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider the investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2017.

Non-agency Mortgage Backed Securities: The Company held private label mortgage-backed securities (“PLMBSs”), including CMOs, at September 30, 2017 with an amortized cost of $216.3 thousand and approximate fair value of $221.7 thousand. The Company held PLMBSs, including CMOs, at December 31, 2016 with an amortized cost of $427.2 thousand and approximate fair value of $436.5 thousand. Management monitors each of these securities on a quarterly basis to identify any deterioration in the credit quality, collateral values and credit support underlying the investments.

State and Local Governments and Other: Management monitors these securities on a quarterly basis to identify any deterioration in the credit quality. Included in the monitoring is a review of the credit rating, a financial analysis and certain demographic data on the underlying issuer. The Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2017.

Note 3—Investment Securities – continued

The following sets forth the amortized cost and fair value of investment securities at September 30, 2017 by contractual maturity. Expected maturities differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay the obligations with or without prepayment penalties. MBSs are based on average life at estimated prepayment speeds.

September 30, 2017	Available-for-sale				Held-to-maturity
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Due in one year or less	$	9,254	$	9,308	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years		119,813		120,124		7,939		8,051
Due after five years through ten years		92,654		92,222		9,118		9,293
Due after ten years		7,529		7,406		—		—
	$	229,250	$	229,060	$	17,057	$	17,344

Note 4—Loans

Loans summarized by category as of September 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016 are as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016		2016
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	44,917	$	42,704	$	38,790
Real estate:
Construction		42,693		45,746		41,228
Mortgage-residential		44,567		47,472		49,330
Mortgage-commercial		398,777		371,112		354,095
Consumer:
Home equity		29,984		31,368		31,743
Other		7,550		8,307		8,255
Total	$	568,488	$	546,709	$	523,441

Note 4—Loans-continued

The detailed activity in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans receivable as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 and for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)							Real estate			Real estate			Consumer
				Real estate			Mortgage			Mortgage			Home		Consumer
	Commercial			construction			Residential			Commercial			Equity		Other			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance December 31, 2016	$	145		$	104		$	438		$	2,793		$	153	$	127		$	1,454	$	5,214
Charge-offs		(5	)		—			—			(30	)		—		(85	)		—		(120	)
Recoveries		3			—			4			158			24		13			—		202
Provisions		41			(10	)		(115	)		(5	)		81		(38	)		406		360
Ending balance September 30, 2017	$	184		$	94		$	327		$	2,916		$	258	$	17		$	1,860	$	5,656

Ending balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	2		$	29		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	31
Collectively evaluated for impairment		184			94			325			2,887			258		17			1,860		5,625

September 30, 2017 Loans receivable:
Ending balance-total	$	44,917		$	42,693		$	44,567		$	398,777		$	29,984	$	7,550		$	—	$	568,488

Ending balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment		—			—			422			4,173			34		—			—		4,629

Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	44,917		$	42,693		$	44,145		$	394,604		$	29,950	$	7,550		$	—	$	563,859

Note 4—Loans-continued

(Dollars in thousands)
					Real estate			Real estate			Consumer
			Real estate		Mortgage			Mortgage			Home			Consumer
	Commercial		Construction		Residential			Commercial			equity			Other			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance December 31, 2015	$	75	$	51	$	223		$	2,036		$	127		$	37		$	2,047		$	4,596
Charge-offs		—		—		(2	)		(94	)		(8	)		(52	)		—			(156	)
Recoveries		4		—		39			16			2			10			—			71
Provisions		51		43		252			778			2			28			(618	)		536
Ending balance September 30, 2016	$	130	$	94	$	512		$	2,736		$	123		$	23		$	1,429		$	5,047

Ending balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	2		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	2

Collectively evaluated for impairment		130		94		510			2,736			123			23			1,429			5,045

September 30, 2016 Loans receivable:
Ending balance-total	$	38,790	$	41,228	$	49,330		$	354,095		$	31,743		$	8,255		$	—		$	523,441

Ending balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment		—		—		421			5,243			56			—			—			5,720

Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	38,790	$	41,228	$	48,909		$	348,852		$	31,687		$	8,255		$	—		$	517,721

Note 4—Loans-continued

(Dollars in thousands)
					Real estate			Real estate			Consumer
			Real estate		Mortgage			Mortgage			Home			Consumer
	Commercial		Construction		Residential			Commercial			equity			Other			Unallocated			Total
December 31, 2016
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance December 31, 2015	$	75	$	51	$	223		$	2,036		$	127		$	37		$	2,047		$	4,596
Charge-offs		—		—		(11	)		(136	)		(20	)		(72	)		—			(239	)
Recoveries		5		—		40			21			3			14			—			83
Provisions		65		53		186			872			43			148			(593	)		774
Ending balance December 31, 2016	$	145	$	104	$	438		$	2,793		$	153		$	127		$	1,454		$	5,214

Ending balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	2		$	4		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	6

Collectively evaluated for impairment		145		104		436			2,789			153			127			1,454			5,208

December 31, 2016 Loans receivable:
Ending balance-total	$	42,704	$	45,746	$	47,472		$	371,112		$	31,368		$	8,307		$	—		$	546,709

Ending balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment		—		—		639			5,124			56			—			—			5,819

Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	42,704	$	45,746	$	46,833		$	365,988		$	31,312		$	8,307		$	—		$	540,890

Note 4—Loans-continued

The detailed activity in the allowance for loan losses as of and for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and the three months ended September 30, 2016 is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)						Real estate			Real estate			Consumer
				Real estate		Mortgage			Mortgage			Home		Consumer
2017	Commercial			Construction		Residential			Commercial			Equity		Other			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance June 30, 2017	$	169		$	76	$	353		$	2,845		$	196	$	24		$	1,827	$	5,490
Charge-offs		(5	)		—		—			(6	)		—		(41	)		—		(52	)
Recoveries		—			—		2			45			—		5			—		52
Provisions		20			18		(28	)		32			62		29			33		166
Ending balance September 30, 2017	$	184		$	94	$	327		$	2,916		$	258	$	17		$	1,860	$	5,656

(Dollars in thousands)					Real estate			Real estate			Consumer
			Real estate		Mortgage			Mortgage			Home		Consumer
2016	Commercial		Construction		Residential			Commercial			Equity		Other			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance June 30, 2016	$	71	$	59	$	207		$	2,349		$	93	$	23		$	2,075		$	4,877
Charge-offs		—		—		(1	)		(36	)		—		(19	)		—			(56	)
Recoveries		1		—		34			8			—		4			—			47
Provisions		58		35		272			415			30		15			(646	)		179
Ending balance September 30, 2016	$	130	$	94	$	512		$	2,736		$	123	$	23		$	1,429		$	5,047

Related party loans and lines of credit are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated persons and generally do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability. The following table presents related party loan transactions for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Beginning Balance December 31,	$	6,103	$	7,037
New Loans		339		431
Less loan repayments		925		1,093
Ending Balance September 30,	$	5,517	$	6,375

Note 4—Loans-continued

The following table presents at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 loans individually evaluated and considered impaired under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310 “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” Impairment includes performing troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”).

(Dollars in thousands)	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Total loans considered impaired	$	4,629	$	5,819

Loans considered impaired for which there is a related allowance for loan loss:
Outstanding loan balance		1,715		224
Related allowance		31		6
Loans considered impaired and previously written down to fair value		2,914		5,595
Average impaired loans		4,675		8,727

The following tables are by loan category and present at September 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and September, 2016 loans individually evaluated and considered impaired under FASB ASC 310 “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” Impairment includes performing TDRs.

(Dollars in thousands)							Nine months ended				Three months ended
September 30, 2017			Unpaid				Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		income		Recorded		income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
With no allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-residential		379		443		—		384		11		378		11
Mortgage-commercial		2,501		5,051		—		2,536		117		2,488		118
Consumer:
Home equity		34		34		—		34		—		56		—
Other		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, agricultural		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-residential		43		43		2		43		2		43		1
Mortgage-commercial		1,672		2,293		29		1,678		111		1,671		31
Consumer:
Home equity		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total:
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-residential		422		486		2		427		13		421		12
Mortgage-commercial		4,173		7,344		29		4,214		228		4,159		149
Consumer:
Home equity		34		34		—		34		—		56		—
Other		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	$	4,629	$	7,864	$	31	$	4,675	$	241	$	4,636	$	161

Note 4—Loans-continued

(Dollars in thousands)							Nine months ended				Three months ended
			Unpaid				Average		Interest		Average		Interest
September 30, 2016	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
With no allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-residential		374		374		—		419		—		411		—
Mortgage-commercial		5,243		7,821		—		8,683		88		8,609		31
Consumer:
Home Equity		56		56		—		57		—		57		—
Other		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-residential		47		47		2		48		2		47		1
Mortgage-commercial		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer:
Home Equity		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total:
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-residential		421		421		2		467		2		458		1
Mortgage-commercial		5,243		7,821		—		8,683		88		8,609		31
Consumer:
Home Equity		56		56		—		57		—		57		—
Other		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	$	5,720	$	8,298	$	2	$	9,207	$	90	$	9,124	$	32

Note 4—Loans-continued

(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2016			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
With no allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-residential		593		603		—		660		—
Mortgage-commercial		4,946		6,821		—		7,777		98
Consumer:
Home Equity		56		56		—		56		—
Other		—		—		—		—		—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-residential		46		46		2		48		2
Mortgage-commercial		178		178		4		186		12
Consumer:
Home Equity		—		—		—		—		—
Other		—		—		—		—		—

Total:
Commercial		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-residential		639		649		2		708		2
Mortgage-commercial		5,124		6,999		4		7,963		110
Consumer:
Home Equity		56		56		—		56		—
Other		—		—		—		—		—
	$	5,819	$	7,704	$	6	$	8,727	$	112

Note 4—Loans-continued

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, including: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed on a monthly basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered as pass rated loans. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is shown in the table below. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, no loans were classified as doubtful.

(Dollars in thousands)			Special
September 30, 2017	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Commercial, financial & agricultural	$	44,735	$	182	$	—	$	—	$	44,917
Real estate:										—
Construction		42,693		—		—		—		42,693
Mortgage – residential		43,061		653		853		—		44,567
Mortgage – commercial		385,796		7,595		5,386		—		398,777
Consumer:		—
Home Equity		28,550		1,191		243		—		29,984
Other		7,550		—		—				7,550
Total	$	552,385	$	9,621	$	6,482	$	—	$	568,488

Note 4—Loans-continued

(Dollars in thousands)			Special
December 31, 2016	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Commercial, financial & agricultural	$	42,486	$	218	$	—	$	—	$	42,704
Real estate:										—
Construction		45,746		—		—		—		45,746
Mortgage – residential		45,751		622		1,099		—		47,472
Mortgage – commercial		358,766		5,773		6,572		—		371,112
Consumer:		—
Home Equity		30,929		180		259		—		31,368
Other		8,302		6		—				8,307
Total	$	531,980	$	6,799	$	7,930	$	—	$	546,709

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, non-accrual loans totaled $2.9 million and $4.1 million, respectively.

TDRs that are still accruing and included in impaired loans at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 amounted to $1.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively. TDRs in non-accrual status at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 amounted to $1.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

Loans greater than 90 days delinquent and still accruing interest were $101.9 thousand and $53.0 thousand at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Acquired credit-impaired loans are accounted for under the accounting guidance for loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality, found in FASB ASC Topic 310-30, (Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality), and initially measured at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loans. Loans acquired in business combinations with evidence of credit deterioration are considered impaired. Loans acquired through business combinations that do not meet the specific criteria of FASB ASC Topic 310-30, but for which a discount is attributable, at least in part to credit quality, are also accounted for under this guidance. Certain acquired loans, including performing loans and revolving lines of credit (consumer and commercial), are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310-20, where the discount is accreted through earnings based on estimated cash flows over the estimated life of the loan.

A summary of changes in the accretable yield for PCI loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Accretable yield, beginning of period	$	50		$	34

Accretion		(29	)		(57	)

Reclassification of nonaccretable difference due to improvement in expected cash flows		—			44
Accretable yield, end of period	$	21		$	21

Note 4—Loans-continued

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Accretable yield, beginning of period	$	53		$	92

Accretion		(17	)		(150	)

Reclassification of nonaccretable difference due to improvement in expected cash flows		18			112
Accretable yield, end of period	$	54		$	54

Note 4—Loans-continued

The following tables are by loan category and present loans past due and on non-accrual status as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

(Dollars in thousands)					Greater than
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and				Total
September 30, 2017	Past Due		Past Due		Accruing		Nonaccrual		Past Due		Current		Total Loans

Commercial	$	255	$	39	$	—	$	—	$	294	$	44,623	$	44,917
Real estate:
Construction		163		—		—		—		163		42,530		42,693
Mortgage-residential		—		—		—		379		379		44,188		44,567
Mortgage-commercial		497		843		—		2,501		3,841		394,936		398,777
Consumer:
Home equity		121		—		—		34		155		29,829		29,984
Other		83		7		102		—		192		7,358		7,550
	$	1,119	$	889	$	102	$	2,914	$	5,024	$	563,464	$	568,488

(Dollars in thousands)					Greater than
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and				Total
December 31, 2016	Past Due		Past Due		Accruing		Nonaccrual		Past Due		Current		Total Loans

Commercial	$	11	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	11	$	42,693	$	42,704
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		45,746		45,746
Mortgage-residential		194		145		32		593		964		46,508		47,472
Mortgage-commercial		995		337		—		3,400		4,732		366,380		371,112
Consumer:
Home equity		59		64		16		56		195		31,173		31,368
Other		16		1		5		—		22		8,285		8,307
	$	1,275	$	547	$	53	$	4,049	$	5,924	$	540,785	$	546,709

Note 4—Loans-continued

The Company reviews TDRs in accordance with applicable regulatory and accounting guidance.

There were no loans determined to be TDRs that were restructured during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 or the three month period ended September 30, 2017.

The following table, by loan category, presents one loan determined to be a TDR during the nine month period ended September 30, 2016. The loan was modified to extend the term of the loan due to financial hardship of the borrower. The loan was subsequently paid off in June 2016.

Troubled Debt Restructurings	For the nine months ended September 30, 2016
(Dollars in thousands)
			Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Investment
Accrual
Mortgage-Commercial		1	$	413	$	413
Total Accrual		1	$	413	$	413

Total TDRs		1	$	413	$	413

During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no loans determined to be TDRs in the previous twelve months that had payment defaults. Defaulted loans are those loans that are greater than 89 days past due.

In the determination of the allowance for loan losses, all TDRs are considered impaired and are reviewed to ensure that one of the three proper valuation methods (fair market value of the collateral, present value of cash flows, or observable market price) is adhered to. All non-accrual loans are written down to their corresponding collateral value. All troubled TDR accruing loans that have a loan balance that exceeds the present value of cash flows will have a specific allocation. All nonaccrual loans are considered impaired. Under ASC 310-10, a loan is impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due including both principal and interest according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.

Note 5 - Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements:

In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance to change the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to reflect the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount equal to the consideration the entity receives or expects to receive. The guidance will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will apply the guidance using a modified retrospective approach. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. As a result of the deferral, the guidance in ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will apply the guidance using a modified retrospective approach. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB amended the Financial Instruments topic of the Accounting Standards Codification to address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company will apply the guidance by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The amendments related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values will be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption of the amendments. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB amended the Leases topic of the Accounting Standards Codification to revise certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leasing transactions. The amendments will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that implementation of the new standard will have on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

In March 2016, the FASB amended the Revenue from Contracts with Customers topic of the Accounting Standards Codification to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations and address how an entity should assess whether it is the principal or the agent in contracts that include three or more parties. The amendments will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions including the income tax consequences, the classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. Additionally, the guidance simplifies two areas specific to entities other than public business entities allowing them apply a practical expedient to estimate the expected term for all awards with performance or service conditions that have certain characteristics and also allowing them to make a one-time election to switch from measuring all liability-classified awards at fair value to measuring them at intrinsic value. The amendments became effective for the Company for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. These amendments did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance to change the accounting for credit losses and modify the impairment model for certain debt securities. The amendments will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for all organizations for periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that implementation of the new standard will have on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Note 5 - Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements-continued

In August 2016, the FASB amended the Statement of Cash Flows topic of the Accounting Standards Codification to clarify how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments will be effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In December 2016, the FASB issued technical corrections and improvements to the Revenue from Contracts with Customers Topic. These corrections make a limited number of revisions to several pieces of the revenue recognition standard issued in 2014. The effective date and transition requirements for the technical corrections will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will apply the guidance using a full retrospective approach. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendment to the Business Combinations Topic is intended to address concerns that the existing definition of a business has been applied too broadly and has resulted in many transactions being recorded as business acquisitions that in substance are more akin to asset acquisitions. The guidance will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB updated the Accounting Changes and Error Corrections and the Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures Topics of the Accounting Standards Codification. The ASU incorporates into the Accounting Standards Codification recent SEC guidance about disclosing, under SEC SAB Topic 11.M, the effect on financial statements of adopting the revenue, leases, and credit losses standards. The ASU was effective upon issuance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on additional disclosure requirements as each of the standards is adopted, however it does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB amended the Goodwill and Other Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification to simplify the accounting for goodwill impairment for public business entities and other entities that have goodwill reported in their financial statements and have not elected the private company alternative for the subsequent measurement of goodwill. The amendment removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The effective date and transition requirements for the technical corrections will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB amended the requirements in the Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification related to the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The amendments shorten the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date. The amendments will be effective for the Company for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 6– Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company adopted FASB ASC Fair Value Measurement Topic 820, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level l

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

FASB ASC 825-10-50 “Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, requires the Company to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below.

Cash and Short Term Investments - The carrying amount of these financial instruments (cash and due from banks, interest-bearing bank balances, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell) approximates fair value. All mature within 90 days and do not present unanticipated credit concerns and are classified as Level 1.

Investment Securities - Measurement is on a recurring basis based upon quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for prepayment assumptions, projected credit losses, and liquidity. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, or by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. Level 2 securities include MBSs issued both by government sponsored enterprises and PLMBSs. Generally these fair values are priced from established pricing models.

Loans Held for Sale - The Company originates fixed rate residential loans on a servicing released basis in the secondary market. Loans closed but not yet settled with an investor, are carried in the Company’s loans held for sale portfolio. These loans are fixed rate residential loans that have been originated in the Company’s name and have closed. Virtually all of these loans have commitments to be purchased by investors at a locked in price with the investors on the same day that the loan was locked in with the company’s customers. Therefore, these loans present very little market risk for the Company and are classified as Level 2. The carrying amount of these loans approximates fair value.

Loans - The fair value of loans are estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities and are classified as Level 2. As discount rates are based on current loan rates as well as management estimates, the fair values presented may not be indicative of the value negotiated in an actual sale. Loans which are deemed to be impaired are primarily valued on a nonrecurring basis at the fair value of the underlying real estate collateral. Such fair values are obtained using independent appraisals, which the Company considers to be Level 3 inputs.

Note 6 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments - continued

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) - OREO is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value on a non-recurring basis. Fair value is based upon independent appraisals or management’s estimation of the collateral and is considered a Level 3 measurement.

Accrued Interest Receivable - The fair value approximates the carrying value and is classified as Level 1.

Deposits - The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. Deposits are classified as Level 2.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances - Fair value is estimated based on discounted cash flows using current market rates for borrowings with similar terms and are classified as Level 2.

Short Term Borrowings - The carrying value of short term borrowings (securities sold under agreements to repurchase and demand notes to the Treasury) approximates fair value. These are classified as Level 2.

Junior Subordinated Debentures - The fair values of junior subordinated debentures is estimated by using discounted cash flow analyses based on incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments. These are classified as Level 2.

Accrued Interest Payable -The fair value approximates the carrying value and is classified as Level 1.

Commitments to Extend Credit - The fair value of these commitments is immaterial because their underlying interest rates approximate market.

Note 6 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments - continued

The carrying amount and estimated fair value by classification level of the Company’s financial instruments as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:

September 30, 2017	Carrying		Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)	amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Financial Assets:
Cash and short term investments	$	27,088	$	27,088	$	27,088	$	—	$	—
Held-to-maturity securities		17,057		17,057		—		17,057		—
Available-for-sale securities		229,060		229,060		—		—		—
Other investments, at cost		2,555		2,555		—		—		2,555
Loans held for sale		6,018		6,018		—		6,018		—
Net loans receivable		562,832		559,811		—		555,213		4,598
Accrued interest		2,901		2,901		2,901		—		—
Financial Liabilities
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	$	195,348	$	195,348	$	—	$	195,348	$	—
Interest bearing demand deposits and money market accounts		332,560		332,560		—		332,560		—
Savings		77,676		77,676		—		77,676		—
Time deposits		164,498		164,829		—		164,829		—
Total deposits		770,082		770,413		—		770,413		—
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances		17,255		17,254		—		17,254		—
Short term borrowings		17,469		17,469		—		17,469		—
Junior subordinated debentures		14,964		15,001		—		15,001		—
Accrued interest payable		514		514		514		—		—

Note 6 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments – continued

December 31, 2016	Carrying		Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)	amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Financial Assets:
Cash and short term investments	$	21,999	$	21,999	$	21,999	$	—	$	—
Held-to-maturity securities		17,193		17,114		—		17,114		—
Available-for-sale securities		253,394		253,394		801		251,593		1,000
Other investments, at cost		1,809		1,809		—		—		1,809
Loans held for sale		5,707		5,707		—		5,707		—
Net loans receivable		541,495		540,487		—		534,674		5,813
Accrued interest		2,925		2,925		2,925		—		—
Financial Liabilities
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	$	182,915	$	182,915	$	—	$	182,915	$	—
Interest bearing demand deposits and money market accounts		327,459		327,459		—		327,459		—
Savings		75,012		75,012		—		75,012		—
Time deposits		181,236		181,638		—		181,638		—
Total deposits		766,622		767,024		—		767,024		—
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances		24,035		24,518		—		24,518		—
Short term borrowings		19,527		19,527		—		19,527		—
Junior subordinated debentures		14,964		15,258		—		15,258		—
Accrued interest payable		532		532		532		—		—

Note 6 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments - continued

The following tables summarize quantitative disclosures about the fair value for each category of assets carried at fair value as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 that are measured on a recurring basis. There were no liabilities carried at fair value as of September 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016 that are measured on a recurring basis.

			Quoted Prices		Significant		Significant
September 30, 2017			in Active markets		Other Observable		Unobservable
Available-for-sale securities			for Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

US Treasury securities	$	1,521	$	—	$	1,521	$	—
Government sponsored enterprises		996		—		996		—
Mortgage-backed securities		123,748		—		123,748		—
Small Business Administration pools		50,365		—		50,365		—
State and local government		51,574		—		51,574		—
Corporate and other securities		856		796		60		—
	$	229,060	$	796	$	228,264	$	—

			Quoted Prices		Significant		Significant
December 31, 2016			in Active markets		Other Observable		Unobservable
Available-for-sale securities			for Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

US Treasury securities	$	1,520	$	—	$	1,520	$	—
Government sponsored enterprises		997		—		997		—
Mortgage-backed securities		144,298		—		144,298		—
Small Business Administration pools		50,184		—		50,184		—
State and local government		54,534		—		54,534		—
Corporate and other securities		1,861		801		60		1,000
	$	253,394	$	801	$	251,593	$	1,000

Note 6 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments - continued

The following table reconciles the changes in Level 3 financial instruments for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 that are measured on a recurring basis.

	September 30,
	2017			2016
(Dollars in thousands)	Corporate Preferred Stock			Corporate Preferred Stock
Beginning Balance December 31:	$	1,000		$	417
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) Included in earnings		—			—
Included in other comprehensive income		—			—
Purchases, issuances, and settlements		—			950
Maturities, sales, payoffs					(417	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		(1,000	)		—
Ending Balance September 30:	$	—		$	950

(Dollars in thousands)
Description	September 30, 2017		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans:
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Real estate:
Mortgage-residential		420		—		—		420
Mortgage-commercial		4,144		—		—		4,144
Consumer:
Home equity		34		—		—		34
Other		—		—		—		—
Total impaired		4,598		—		—		4,598
Other real estate owned:
Construction		141		—		—		141
Mortgage-residential		47		—		—		47
Mortgage-commercial		545		—		—		545
Total other real estate owned		733		—		—		733
Total	$	5,331	$	—	$	—	$	5,331

Note 6 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments - continued

(Dollars in thousands)
Description	December 31, 2016		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans:
Commercial & Industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Real estate:
Mortgage-residential		637		—		—		637
Mortgage-commercial		5,120		—		—		5,120
Consumer:
Home equity		56		—		—		56
Other		—		—		—		—
Total impaired		5,813		—		—		5,813
Other real estate owned:
Construction		141		—		—		141
Mortgage-residential		269		—		—		269
Mortgage-commercial		736		—		—		736
Total other real estate owned		1,146		—		—		1,146
Total	$	6,959	$	—	$	—	$	6,959

The Company has a large percentage of loans with real estate serving as collateral. Loans which are deemed to be impaired are primarily valued on a nonrecurring basis at the fair value of the underlying real estate collateral. Such fair values are obtained using independent appraisals, which the Company considers to be Level 3 inputs. Third party appraisals are generally obtained when a loan is identified as being impaired or at the time it is transferred to OREO. This internal process consists of evaluating the underlying collateral to independently obtained comparable properties. With respect to less complex or smaller credits, an internal evaluation may be performed. Generally, the independent and internal evaluations are updated annually. Factors considered in determining the fair value include, among others, geographic sales trends, the value of comparable surrounding properties and the condition of the property. The aggregate amount of impaired loans was $4.6 million and $5.8 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Note 6 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments - continued

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value as of September 30, 2017	Valuation Technique	Significant Observable Inputs	Significant Unobservable Inputs
OREO	$ 733	Appraisal Value/Comparison Sales/Other estimates	Appraisals and or sales of comparable properties	Appraisals discounted 6% to 16% for sales commissions and other holding cost
Impaired loans	$ 4,598	Appraisal Value	Appraisals and or sales of comparable properties	Appraisals discounted 6% to 16% for sales commissions and other holding cost

(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value as of December 31, 2016	Valuation Technique	Significant Observable Inputs	Significant Unobservable Inputs
Corporate and Other Securities	$ 1,000	Estimation based on comparable non-listed securities	Comparable transactions	n/a
OREO	$ 1,146	Appraisal Value/Comparison Sales/Other estimates	Appraisals and or sales of comparable properties	Appraisals discounted 6% to 16% for sales commissions and other holding cost
Impaired loans	$ 5,813	Appraisal Value	Appraisals and or sales of comparable properties	Appraisals discounted 6% to 16% for sales commissions and other holding cost

Note 7 — Deposits

The Company’s total deposits are comprised of the following at the dates indicated:

	September 30,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	$	195,348	$	182,915
Interest bearing demand deposits and money market accounts		332,560		327,459
Savings		77,676		75,012
Time deposits		164,498		181,236
Total deposits	$	770,082	$	766,622

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had time deposits greater than $250,000 of $36.2 million and $37.7 million, respectively.

Note 8 – Reportable Segments-continued

The Company’s reportable segments represent the distinct product lines the Company offers and are viewed separately for strategic planning by management. The Company has four reportable segments:

Commercial and retail banking: The Company’s primary business is to provide deposit and lending products and services to its commercial and retail customers.

Mortgage banking: This segment provides mortgage origination services for loans that will be sold to investors in the secondary market.

Investment advisory and non-deposit: This segment provides investment advisory services and non-deposit products.

Corporate: This segment includes the parent company financial information, including interest on parent company debt and dividend income received from First Community Bank (the “Bank”).

Nine months ended September 30, 2017	Commercial				Investment
(Dollars in thousands)	and Retail		Mortgage		advisory and
	Banking		Banking		non-deposit		Corporate			Eliminations			Consolidated

Dividend and Interest Income	$	23,072	$	331	$	—	$	2,191		$	(2,178	)	$	23,416
Interest expense		1,660		—		—		420			—			2,080
Net interest income	$	21,412	$	331	$	—	$	1,771		$	(2,178	)	$	21,336
Provision for loan losses		360		—		—		—			—			360
Noninterest income		3,097		2,950		908		90			—			7,045
Noninterest expense		17,699		2,181		839		265			—			20,984
Net income before taxes	$	6,450	$	1,100	$	69	$	1,596		$	(2,178	)	$	7,037
Income tax provision (benefit)		2,037		—		—		(313	)		—			1,724
Net income	$	4,413	$	1,100	$	69	$	1,909		$	(2,178	)	$	5,313

Three months ended September 30, 2017	Commercial				Investment
(Dollars in thousands)	and Retail		Mortgage		advisory and
	Banking		Banking		non-deposit		Corporate			Eliminations			Consolidated

Dividend and Interest Income	$	7,763	$	153	$	—	$	747		$	(742	)		7,921
Interest expense		547		—		—		147			—			694
Net interest income	$	7,216	$	153	$	—	$	600		$	(742	)	$	7,227
Provision for loan losses		166		—		—		—			—			166
Noninterest income		1,053		1,032		337		—			—			2,422
Noninterest expense		5,780		769		262		83			—			6,894
Net income before taxes	$	2,323	$	416	$	75	$	517		$	(742	)	$	2,589
Income tax provision (benefit)		772		—		—		(76	)		—			696
Net income	$	1,551	$	416	$	75	$	593		$	(742	)	$	1,893

Note 8 – Reportable Segments-continued

Nine months ended September 30, 2016	Commercial					Investment
(Dollars in thousands)	and Retail			Mortgage		advisory and
	Banking			Banking		non-deposit		Corporate		Eliminations			Consolidated

Dividend and Interest Income	$	21,732		$	142	$	—	$	2,072	$	(1,950	)	$	21,996
Interest expense		1,968			—		—		363		—			2,331
Net interest income	$	19,764		$	142	$	—	$	1,709	$	(1,950	)	$	19,665
Provision for loan losses		536			—		—		—		—			536
Noninterest income		3,353			2,516		871		—		—			6,740
Noninterest expense		16,227			1,828		766		437		—			19,258
Net income before taxes	$	6,354		$	830	$	105	$	1,272	$	(1,950	)	$	6,611
Income tax (provision) benefit		(1,910	)		—		—		189		—			(1,721	)
Net income	$	4,444		$	830	$	105	$	1,461	$	(1,950	)	$	4,890

Three months ended September 30, 2016	Commercial					Investment
(Dollars in thousands)	and Retail			Mortgage		advisory and
	Banking			Banking		non-deposit		Corporate		Eliminations			Consolidated

Dividend and Interest Income	$	7,336		$	60	$	—	$	658	$	(654	)	$	7,400
Interest expense		625			—		—		124		—			749
Net interest income	$	6,711		$	60	$	—	$	534	$	(654	)	$	6,651
Provision for loan losses		179			—		—		—		—			179
Noninterest income		1,166			937		284		—		—			2,387
Noninterest expense		5,506			672		249		156		—			6,583
Net income before taxes	$	2,192		$	325	$	35	$	378	$	(654	)	$	2,276
Income tax (provision) benefit		(677	)		—		—		78		—			(599	)
Net income	$	1,515		$	325	$	35	$	456	$	(654	)	$	1,677

	Commercial					Investment
(Dollars in thousands)	and Retail			Mortgage		advisory and
	Banking			Banking		non-deposit		Corporate		Eliminations			Consolidated

Total Assets as of September 30, 2017	$	900,144		$	14,061	$	23	$	101,520	$	(101,520	)	$	914,228

Total Assets as of December 31, 2016	$	904,568		$	8,158	$	32	$	98,210	$	(96,175	)	$	914,793

Note 9 – Subsequent Events

Subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. Recognized subsequent events are events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. Nonrecognized subsequent events are events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date. Management has reviewed events occurring through the date the financial statements were available to be issued and no subsequent events occurred requiring accrual.

Effective October 20, 2017, the Company completed its previously announced merger with Cornerstone Bancorp (“Cornerstone”), the holding company for Cornerstone National Bank, pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 11, 2017 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and between the Company and Cornerstone, whereby Cornerstone merged with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Cornerstone shareholders have the right to receive either $11.00 in cash or 0.54 shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination thereof, for each Cornerstone share of common stock they owned immediately prior to the Merger, subject to the limitation that 30% of the outstanding shares of Cornerstone common stock will be exchanged for cash and 70% of the outstanding shares of Cornerstone common stock will be exchanged for shares of the Company’s common stock.

Immediately following the consummation of the Merger, Cornerstone National Bank merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This report contains statements which constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other matters, the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance, and business of our Company. Forward-looking statements are based on many assumptions and estimates and are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, as they will depend on many factors about which we are unsure, including many factors which are beyond our control. The words “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “continue,” “assume,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “forecast,” “goal,” and “estimate,” as well as similar expressions, are meant to identify such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those described under the heading “Risk Factors” in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC and the following:

credit losses as a result of, among other potential factors, declining real estate values, increasing interest rates, increasing unemployment, changes in customer payment behavior or other factors;

the amount of our loan portfolio collateralized by real estate and weaknesses in the real estate market;

restrictions or conditions imposed by our regulators on our operations;

the adequacy of the level of our allowance for loan losses and the amount of loan loss provisions required in future periods;

examinations by our regulatory authorities, including the possibility that the regulatory authorities may, among other things, require us to increase our allowance for loan losses or write-down assets;

reduced earnings due to higher other-than-temporary impairment charges resulting from additional decline in the value of our securities portfolio, specifically as a result of increasing default rates, and loss severities on the underlying real estate collateral;

a loss of customers or other challenges related to the successful integration of Cornerstone’s business;

increases in competitive pressure in the banking and financial services industries;

changes in the interest rate environment which could reduce anticipated or actual margins;

changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment, including governmental initiatives affecting the financial services industry;

general economic conditions resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality;

changes occurring in business conditions and inflation;

changes in access to funding or increased regulatory requirements with regard to funding;

increased cybersecurity risk, including potential business disruptions or financial losses;

changes in deposit flows;

changes in technology;

our current and future products, services, applications and functionality and plans to promote them;

changes in monetary and tax policies;

changes in accounting standards, policies, estimates, practices and procedures;

our assumptions and estimates used in applying critical accounting policies, which may prove unreliable, inaccurate or not predictive of actual results;

the rate of delinquencies and amounts of loans charged-off;

the rate of loan growth in recent years and the lack of seasoning of a portion of our loan portfolio;

our ability to maintain appropriate levels of capital, including levels of capital required under the capital rules implementing Basel III;

our ability to attract and retain key personnel;

our ability to retain our existing clients, including our deposit relationships;

adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses;

loss of consumer confidence and economic disruptions resulting from terrorist activities;

disruptions due to flooding, severe weather or other natural disasters; and

other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC.

Because of these and other risks and uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by any forward-looking statements. For additional information with respect to factors that could cause actual results to differ from the expectations stated in the forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC. In addition, our past results of operations do not necessarily indicate our future results. Therefore, we caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking information and statements.

All forward-looking statements in this report are based on information available to us as of the date of this report. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee you that these expectations will be achieved. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Overview

The following discussion describes our results of operations for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine-month and three-month period ended September 30, 2016 and also analyzes our financial condition as of September 30, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016. Like most community banks, we derive most of our income from interest we receive on our loans and investments. Our primary source of funds for making these loans and investments is our deposits, on which we pay interest. Consequently, one of the key measures of our success is our amount of net interest income, or the difference between the income on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the expense on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits. Another key measure is the spread between the yield we earn on these interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities.

There are risks inherent in all loans, so we maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. We establish and maintain this allowance by charging a provision for loan losses against our operating earnings. In the following section we have included a discussion of this process, as well as several tables describing our allowance for loan losses and the allocation of this allowance among our various categories of loans.

In addition to earning interest on our loans and investments, we earn income through fees and other expenses we charge to our customers. We describe the various components of this non-interest income, as well as our non-interest expense, in the following discussion.

The following discussion and analysis identifies significant factors that have affected our financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying financial statements. We encourage you to read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes and the other statistical information also included in this report.

Recent Developments

Effective October 20, 2017, we consummated the previously announced merger with Cornerstone, the holding company for Cornerstone National Bank, pursuant to which Cornerstone was merged with and into the Company, with the Company surviving. Promptly following the Merger, Cornerstone National Bank was merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving. Consummation of the merger was subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including approval of the Merger Agreement by the shareholders of Cornerstone and approval by the appropriate regulatory agencies. For more information on the merger with Cornerstone, see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and with general practices within the banking industry in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in the footnotes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2017 and our notes included in the consolidated financial statements in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC.

Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by us that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions we use are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgment and assumptions we make, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates that could have a material impact on the carrying values of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We believe the allowance for loan losses is the critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgment and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Some of the more critical judgments supporting the amount of our allowance for loan losses include judgments about the credit worthiness of borrowers, the estimated value of the underlying collateral, the assumptions about cash flow, determination of loss factors for estimating credit losses, the impact of current events, and conditions, and other factors impacting the level of probable inherent losses. Under different conditions or using different assumptions, the actual amount of credit losses incurred by us may be different from management’s estimates provided in our consolidated financial statements. Refer to the portion of this discussion that addresses our allowance for loan losses for a more complete discussion of our processes and methodology for determining our allowance for loan losses.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the sum of the estimated fair values of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less the estimated fair value of the liabilities assumed. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life and is evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. Qualitative factors are assessed to first determine if it is more likely than not (more than 50%) that the carrying value of goodwill is less than fair value. These qualitative factors include but are not limited to overall deterioration in general economic conditions, industry and market conditions, and overall financial performance. If determined that it is more likely than not that there has been a deterioration in the fair value of the carrying value than the first of a two-step process would be performed. The first step, used to identify potential impairment, involves comparing each reporting unit’s estimated fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment.

If required, the second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business combination, by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted. Management has determined that the Company has one reporting unit.

Core deposit intangibles consist of costs that resulted from the acquisition of deposits from Savannah River and First South. Core deposit intangibles represent the estimated value of long-term deposit relationships acquired in this transaction. These costs are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the deposit accounts acquired on a method that we believe reasonably approximates the anticipated benefit stream from the accounts. The estimated useful lives are periodically reviewed for reasonableness.

Income Taxes and Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of the transactions reported in our consolidated financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related to differences between the tax basis and accounting basis of certain assets and liabilities, including available-for-sale securities, allowance for loan losses, write downs of OREO properties, accumulated depreciation, net operating loss carry forwards, accretion income, deferred compensation, intangible assets, and pension plan and post-retirement benefits. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is “more likely than not” that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. We file a consolidated federal income tax return for the Bank. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we were in a net deferred tax asset position.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

We evaluate securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) the outlook for receiving the contractual cash flows of the investments, (4) the anticipated outlook for changes in the general level of interest rates, and (5) our intent and ability to retain our investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value or for a debt security whether it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security prior to recovering its fair value (See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Business Combinations, Method of Accounting for Loans Acquired

We account for acquisitions under FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses related to the acquired loans is recorded on the acquisition date because the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk.

Acquired credit-impaired loans are accounted for under the accounting guidance for loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality, found in FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. and initially measured at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loans. Loans acquired in business combinations with evidence of credit deterioration are considered impaired. Loans acquired through business combinations that do not meet the specific criteria of FASB ASC Topic 310-30, but for which a discount is attributable, at least in part to credit quality, are also accounted for under this guidance. Certain acquired loans, including performing loans and revolving lines of credit (consumer and commercial), are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310-20, where the discount is accreted through earnings based on estimated cash flows over the estimated life of the loan.

Comparison of Results of Operations for Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net Income

Our net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $5.3 million or $0.78 diluted earnings per common share, as compared to $4.9 million or $0.72 diluted earnings per common share for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Net interest income increased $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period 2016. This increase in net income is a result of an increase in average earning assets, which increased by $26.6 million in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Average earning assets were $810.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $837.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis increased to 3.51% during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to 3.35% during the first nine months of 2016. Non-interest income increased by $305 thousand in the first nine months of 2017 compared to the first nine months of 2016. This was primarily attributable to an increase in mortgage banking income of $435 thousand in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Non-interest expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased $1.7 million as compared to the same period in 2016. This was primarily attributable to an increase in salary and benefits expense of $997 thousand as a result of increases in staff, normal salary adjustments, increased medical benefit premiums and additional costs incurred as a result of our core processing conversion in the first half of 2017, and to costs of approximately $326 thousand related our acquisition of Cornerstone which closed on October 20, 2017.

Net Interest Income

Please refer to the table at the end of this Item 2 for the yield and rate data for interest-bearing balance sheet components during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, along with average balances and the related interest income and interest expense amounts.

Net interest income was $21.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to $19.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The $1.6 million increase in net interest income was primarily attributable to an increase in average earning assets of $26.6 million as well as an increase of 16 basis points in the taxable equivalent net interest margin between the two periods. Our net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis was 3.51% during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 3.35% for the same period in 2016. The yield on earning assets increased by 11 basis points in the first nine months of 2017 to 3.74% as compared to 3.63% in the same period of 2016. Average loans comprised 67.1% of average earning assets in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to 62.6% in the same period of 2016. The yield on our loan portfolio decreased 11 basis points in the nine month-period ended September 30, 2017 to 4.52% as compared to 4.63% during the same period in 2016. The yield on our investment portfolio increased from 2.04% for the nine month ended September 30, 2016 to 2.21% for the same period in 2017. Recent increases in the federal funds target rate have increased the yields on certain variable rate products in both our loan and investment portfolios. We have approximately $100 million in loans and $32 million in investments that are indexed to the Wall Street Journal prime rate. The prime rate is adjusted as changes are made to the federal funds rate. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities during the first nine months of 2017 was 0.44% as compared to 0.50% in the same period of 2016, reflecting a 6 basis point decrease. The continued focus and resulting shift in our deposit funding mix has continued to allow us to lower our overall cost of funds. Interest-bearing transaction accounts, money market accounts and savings deposits, which are typically our lower costing funds, represent 63.8% of our average interest bearing liabilities during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to 61.5% in the same period of 2016. During the first nine months of 2017, we prepaid $13 million in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta advances and incurred prepayment penalties of $446 thousand on these prepayments. The interest rate on these advances was approximately 4%. These pay-downs contributed to the decline in the average rate on other borrowings from 2.12% during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to 1.81% for the same period in 2017.

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the allowance for loan losses was $5.7 million and $5.2 million, respectively, which represented 0.99% of total loans and 0.97% of total loans at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Loans that were acquired in the acquisition of Savannah River Financial Corporation (“Savannah River”) and in the acquisition of certain deposits and loans from First South Bank (“First South”), both occurring in 2014, are accounted for under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 310-30. These acquired loans were initially measured at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loans. The credit component on loans related to cash flows not expected to be collected is not subsequently accreted (non-accretable difference) into interest income. Any remaining portion representing the excess of a loan’s or pool’s cash flows expected to be collected over the fair value is accreted (accretable difference) into interest income. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the remaining credit component on loans attributable to acquired loans in the Savannah River and First South transactions was $276 thousand and $334 thousand, respectively. Our provision for loan losses was $536 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $360 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This provision is made based on our assessment of general loan loss risk and asset quality. The allowance for loan losses represents an amount which we believe will be adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. Our judgment as to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on a number of assumptions about future events, which we believe to be reasonable, but which may or may not prove to be accurate. Our determination of the allowance for loan losses is based on evaluations of the collectability of loans, including consideration of factors such as the balance of impaired loans, the quality, mix, and size of our overall loan portfolio, the experience ability and depth of lending personnel, economic conditions (local and national) that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the amount and quality of collateral securing the loans, our historical loan loss experience, and a review of specific problem loans. We also consider subjective issues such as changes in the lending policies and procedures, changes in the local/national economy, changes in volume or type of credits, changes in volume/severity of problem loans, quality of loan review and board of director oversight, and concentrations of credit. Periodically, we adjust the amount of the allowance based on changing circumstances. We charge recognized losses to the allowance and add subsequent recoveries back to the allowance for loan losses.

We perform an analysis quarterly to assess the risk within the loan portfolio. The portfolio is segregated into similar risk components for which historical loss ratios are calculated and adjusted for identified changes in current portfolio characteristics. Historical loss ratios are calculated by product type and by regulatory credit risk classification (See Note 4 – Loans). The annualized weighted average loss ratios over the last 36 months for loans classified substandard, special mention and pass have been approximately 3.73%, 1.39% and 0.02%, respectively. The allowance consists of an allocated and unallocated allowance. The allocated portion is determined by types and ratings of loans within the portfolio. The unallocated portion of the allowance is established for losses that exist in the remainder of the portfolio and compensates for uncertainty in estimating the loan losses. The allocated portion of the allowance is based on historical loss experience as well as certain qualitative factors as explained above. The qualitative factors have been established based on certain assumptions made as a result of the current economic conditions and are adjusted as conditions change to be directionally consistent with these changes. The unallocated portion of the allowance is composed of factors based on management’s evaluation of various conditions that are not directly measured in the estimation of probable losses through the experience formula or specific allowances. The overall risk as measured in our three-year lookback, both quantitatively and qualitatively, does not encompass a full economic cycle. The U.S. economy has been in an extended period of recovery and slow economic growth. The period at which we will reach full recovery or revert back to a slowing economy is not determinable. Net charge-offs in the 2009 to 2011 period averaged 63 basis points annualized in our loan portfolio. Over the most recent three-year period, net charge-offs have averaged approximately 8 basis points annualized. We believe the unallocated portion of our allowance represents potential risk associated throughout a full economic cycle. With the existing economic uncertainty, subpar inflation, geopolitical risks, and global economic slowdown, management does not believe it would be judicious to reduce substantially the overall level of the allowance at this time.

Our Company has a significant portion of its loan portfolio with real estate as the underlying collateral. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, approximately 90.7% of the loan portfolio had real estate collateral. When loans, whether commercial or personal, are granted, they are based on the borrower’s ability to generate repayment cash flows from income sources sufficient to service the debt. Real estate is generally taken to reinforce the likelihood of the ultimate repayment and as a secondary source of repayment. We work closely with all our borrowers that experience cash flow or other economic problems, and we believe that we have the appropriate processes in place to monitor and identify problem credits. There can be no assurance that charge-offs of loans in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses as estimated at any point in time or that provisions for loan losses will not be significant to a particular accounting period. The allowance is also subject to examination and testing for adequacy by regulatory agencies, which may consider such factors as the methodology used to determine adequacy and the size of the allowance relative to that of peer institutions. Such regulatory agencies could require us to adjust our allowance based on information available to them at the time of their examination.

Non-performing assets were $3.7 million (0.41% of total assets) at September 30, 2017 as compared to $5.2 million (0.59% of total assets) at December 31, 2016. While we believe our amount of non-performing assets compares favorably to current industry results (both nationally and locally), we continue to be concerned about the impact of this economic environment on our customer base of local businesses and professionals. There were 35 loans totaling $3.0 million included in non-performing status (non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 days and still accruing) at September 30, 2017. The largest non-performing loan is a $903 thousand first mortgage on developed lots to be sold for residential use. The average balance of the remaining 34 loans is approximately $62.1 thousand and the majority of these loans are secured by first mortgage liens. At the time the loans are placed in non-accrual status, we typically obtain an updated appraisal and, if the loan balance exceeds fair value, write the balance down to the fair value. At September 30, 2017, we had loans totaling $2.0 million that were delinquent 30 days to 89 days which represented 0.35% of total loans.

Our management continuously monitors non-performing, classified and past due loans to identify deterioration regarding the condition of these loans. We have identified one loan relationship in the amount of $1.0 million that is current as to principal and interest and not included in non-performing assets that could represent a potential problem loan. This balance is included as substandard loans in Note 4 of the financial statements.

The following table summarizes the activity related to our allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:

Allowance for Loan Losses

(Dollars in thousands)	Nine months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016
Average loans outstanding (including loans held for sale)	$	561,844		$	507,326
Loans outstanding at period end	$	568,488		$	523,441
Non-performing assets:
Nonaccrual loans	$	2,914		$	3,905
Loans 90 days past due still accruing		102			99
Foreclosed real estate		733			1,198
Total non-performing assets	$	3,749		$	5,202

Beginning balance of allowance	$	5,214		$	4,596
Loans charged-off:
1-4 family residential mortgage		—			2
Non-residential real estate		30			94
Home equity		5			8
Commercial		—			—
Installment & credit card		85			52
Total loans charged-off		120			156
Recoveries:
1-4 family residential mortgage		4			39
Non-residential real estate		158			16
Home equity		24			2
Commercial		3			4
Installment & credit card		13			10
Total recoveries		202			71
Net loan charge offs (recoveries)		(82	)		85
Provision for loan losses		360			536
Balance at period end	$	5,656		$	5,047

Net charge -offs to average loans		-0.01	%		0.02	%
Allowance as percent of total loans		0.99	%		0.96	%
Non-performing assets as % of total assets		0.41	%		0.57	%
Allowance as % of non-performing assets		150.87	%		97.02	%

The following allocation of the allowance to specific components is not necessarily indicative of future losses or future allocations. The entire allowance is available to absorb losses in the portfolio.

Composition of the Allowance for Loan Losses

(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	184	7.9	%	$	145	7.8	%
Real estate:
Construction		94	7.5	%		104	8.4	%
Mortgage-residential		327	7.8	%		438	8.7	%
Mortgage-commercial		2,916	70.2	%		2,793	67.9	%
Consumer:
Home equity		258	5.3	%		153	5.7	%
Other		17	1.3	%		127	1.5	%
Unallocated		1,860	N/A			1,454	N/A
Total	$	5,656	100.0	%	$	5,214	100.0	%

Accrual of interest is discontinued on loans when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, that a borrower’s financial condition is such that the collection of interest is doubtful. A delinquent loan is generally placed in nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days or more past due. At the time a loan is placed in nonaccrual status, all interest, which has been accrued on the loan but remains unpaid is reversed and deducted from earnings as a reduction of reported interest income. No additional interest is accrued on the loan balance until the collection of both principal and interest becomes reasonably certain.

Non-interest Income and Non-interest Expense

Non-interest income during the first nine months of 2017 was $7.0 million as compared to $6.7 million during the same period in 2016. Mortgage banking income increased $435 thousand during the first nine months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Mortgage loan rates remain favorable and we continue to emphasize this source of revenue. We added one additional mortgage loan originator during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period of 2016. During the first nine months of 2017, mortgage loan production was $83.4 million as compared to $77.2 million in the same period of 2016. Investment advisory fees and non-deposit commissions increased $37.0 thousand to $908 thousand in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to $871 thousand in the same period in 2016. Management continues to focus on increasing this recurring source of revenue by increasing total assets under management. Assets under management at September 30, 2017 amounted to $254.0 million as compared to $195.1 million at September 30, 2016. Recent changes in the payment structure on these types of products have had a negative impact in the short term but will build a recurring revenue stream that should have a beneficial impact in the future. During the first nine months of 2017, we sold investment securities for a net gain of $350 thousand as compared to a gain on the sale of investment securities of $601 thousand in the same period of 2016. The gains in 2017 and 2016 were offset by prepayment penalties in the amount of $446 thousand and $459 thousand, respectively. The prepayment penalties resulted from early payoffs of $13.0 million and $11.4 million of FHLB advances in the first nine months of 2017 and 2016, respectively. We had gains on the sale of other real estate of $128 thousand in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to a loss of $36 thousand in the same period of 2016.

Total non-interest expense increased by $1.7 million, or 9.0%, during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Salary and benefit expense increased $997 thousand from $11.5 million in the first nine months of 2016 to $12.5 million in the first nine months of 2017. This increase is a result of normal salary adjustments, increased medical benefit premiums and additional costs incurred as a result of our core processing conversion in the first half of 2017. In addition, the increase in mortgage loan production has resulted in increased commission-based compensation received by the mortgage loan producers. At September 30, 2017, we had 208 full time equivalent employees as compared to 201 at September 30, 2016. New staff additions in the last half of 2016 and early in 2017 included eight new positions, including a Chief Operations Officer, loan operations staff, additional lending staff as well as a new financial advisor position. As a result of our core processing conversion that was completed during the first nine months of 2017, we incurred increases in overtime and temporary help of approximately $125 thousand in the first nine months of 2017. We do not anticipate that these costs will be recurring. Equipment expense increased $40 thousand in the first nine months of 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016. This increase is primarily a result of our core processing conversion to an outsourced environment which resulted in writing down certain prepaid items and equipment related to operating our data processing in-house. Marketing and public relations expense increased $86 thousand in the first nine months of 2017 to $615 thousand as compared to $529 thousand in the same period of 2016. We incurred approximately $59 thousand in expenses related to the core processing conversion that were charged to this expense category. FDIC assessments decreased by $102 thousand in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. As of July 2016, the FDIC adjusted the assessment calculations and at the time we estimated the new formula would reduce our overall annual assessment by approximately 40 percent. Merger expenses reflected in our 2017 nine month results relate to the previously mentioned acquisition of Cornerstone which closed on October 20, 2017. It is anticipated that there will be additional expenses incurred related to the merger in the fourth quarter of 2017 of approximately $325 thousand. Non-interest expense “Other” increased by $514 thousand in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Data processing fees increased $160 thousand in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. These expenses relate to our conversion to an outsourced data processing environment in the first half of 2017. Many of the related costs to data processing were previously captured in the Equipment expense category for maintenance and licensing fees associated with processing in an in-house environment. In addition, legal and professional fees increased $281 thousand. Included in the increase of legal and professional fees are consulting fees associated with our core processing conversion of $72 thousand, $60 thousand in audit and accounting fees and $55 thousand related to a mortgage origination process improvement engagement. As of June 30, 2016, our market capitalization crossed the threshold which resulted in requiring an internal control audit by our independent auditors under the Sarbanes Oxley 404 legislation. Insurance expense increased by $125 thousand during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. This primarily results from the renewal of our three year D&O and Financial Institution Bond as well as other policies in the fourth quarter of 2016. Due to our increased asset size and adjustments to certain coverages, the increased premiums are reflected in this overall increase in Insurance expense.

The following is a summary of the components of other non-interest expense for the periods indicated:

(Dollars in thousands)	Nine months ended
	September 30,
	2017		2016
Data processing	$	788	$	628
Supplies		114		101
Telephone		270		261
Courier		77		70
Correspondent services		161		187
Insurance		332		207
Postage		101		137
Legal and professional fees		817		536
Loss on limited partnership interest		81		123
Director fees		281		294
Shareholder expense		97		113
Dues		100		85
Subscriptions		94		108
Loan closing costs/fees		15		163
Other		768		569
	$	4,096	$	3,582

Income Tax Expense

Our effective tax rate was 24.5% and 26.0% in the first nine months of 2017 and 2016, respectively. Effective for years beginning after December 15, 2016, the accounting for share-based compensation changed the recognition of the tax effects of deductions for tax purposes of compensation cost not recognized in the income statement. Previously, the income tax effects of these deductions were recorded directly to equity. Beginning in 2017, all of the tax effects of share-based compensation are recognized in the income statement. The tax benefit is recognized at the time of settlement of the share-based payments. During the first quarter of 2017, the recognition of settled share-based payments reduced our tax expense by approximately $115 thousand. This accounting change may increase the volatility of income tax expense in future periods when share-based compensation is settled or vests. As a result of our current level of tax exempt securities in our investment portfolio and our BOLI holdings, the effective tax rate is expected to be 27.0% to 28.0% throughout the remainder of 2017. There are no share based payments scheduled to vest or settle during the remainder of 2017.

Comparison of Results of Operations for Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net Income

Our net income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $1.89 million, or $0.28 diluted earnings per common share, as compared to $1.68 million, or $0.25 diluted earnings per common share, for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in net interest income between the two periods is primarily due to an $8.8 million increase in average earning assets as well as a 23 basis point increase in our net interest margin. Net interest income increased $576 thousand between the two periods. This increase was partially offset by increased non-interest expense of $311 thousand. These cost primarily related to previously mentioned merger related expenses which were $228 thousand in the third quarter of 2017.

Net Interest Income

Please refer to the table at the end of this Item 2 for the yield and rate data for interest-bearing balance sheet components during the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, along with average balances and the related interest income and interest expense amounts.

Net interest income was $7.2 million and $6.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our tax equivalent net interest margin increased by 23 basis points from 3.29% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 to 3.52% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The continued focus on changing the mix of earning assets from investment securities to loans also benefitted the net interest margin. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, loans represented 67.9% of average earning assets as compared to 62.7% in the same period of 2016. The yield on loans decreased 8 basis points in the third quarter of 2017 (4.49%) as compared to the same period in 2016 (4.57%). The yield on earning assets for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was 3.75% and 3.55%, respectively. The yield on our securities portfolio increased from 1.93% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 to 2.25% for the same period in 2017. This increase results from the variable rate portion of the investment portfolio being positively impacted by the increases in the federal funds rate in December 2016, March 2017 and June 2017. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities during the three months ended September 30, 2017 was 0.44% as compared to 0.47% in the same period of 2016. During the third quarter of 2017, deposit account funding, excluding time deposits, represented 78.2% of total average deposits. For the third quarter of 2016, funding from these lower cost deposit sources represented 75.7% of total average deposits. During the third quarter of 2017, we paid down $5.0 million in longer term FHLB advances. The pay-down on these advances contributed to reducing our cost of other borrowings from 1.94% in the third quarter of 2016 to 1.79% in the third quarter of 2017.

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the allowance for loan losses was $5.7 million, or 0.99% of total loans (excluding loans held for sale), and $5.2 million, or 0.95% of total loans (excluding loans held for sale), respectively. As previously discussed, the provision is made based on our assessment of general loan loss risk and asset quality, historical loss experience and various other qualitative factors.

Non-interest Income and Non-interest Expense

Non-interest income during the third quarter of 2017 and 2016 was $2.4 million. Mortgage banking income increased $95 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Mortgage loan production in the third quarter of 2017 was $28.4 million as compared to $29.1 million in the third quarter of 2016. The increase in mortgage banking income is a result of an improvement of approximately 40 basis points on the realized yield on the loans sold in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. During the third quarter of 2017 and 2016, we sold securities in the amount of $2.2 and $18.2 million and recognized a net gain of $124 thousand and $478 thousand, respectively. These gains were offset by penalties on the pre-payment of $5.0 million and $11.4 million in the third quarter of 2017 and 2016, respectively. The pre-payment penalty amounted to $165 thousand and $459 thousand in the third quarter of 2017 and 2016, respectively. As previously noted in the nine month discussion, the interest rate on the FHLB advances that were paid down allowed us to reduce our overall cost of other borrowed money. Non-interest income “Other” decreased by $50 thousand in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period of 2016. The decrease primarily results from vacancies on rental space on excess office space in the third quarter of 2017 that was fully leased in the third quarter of 2016.

Total non-interest expense increased $314 thousand in third quarter of 2017 to $6.9 million as compared to $6.6 million in the third quarter of 2016. Salary and benefit expense increased $234 thousand from $3.9 million in the third quarter of 2016 to $4.1 million in the third quarter of 2017. This increase is primarily a result of the normal salary adjustments, increased medical insurance expense and addition of certain key staff positions. Equipment expense decreased $46 thousand in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period of 2016. As noted in the discussion of the nine month results, this decrease is a result of the change from operating in an in-house core processing environment to an outsourced environment. These expenses are now included in “Other” expense within the data processing cost. Marketing and public relations expense decreased from $240 thousand in the third quarter of 2016 to $96 thousand in the third quarter of 2017. The timing of a media campaign impacts the recognition of marketing expense, and it is expected that the overall 2017 annual media cost will not vary substantially from the annual cost incurred in 2016. Non-interest expense “Other” increased by $122 thousand in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. As noted above, the outsourcing of our core processing system accounts for the majority of this increase and some of the data processing related expenses included in Equipment Expense are now being captured in data processing expense. We incurred merger expenses of $228 thousand in the third quarter of 2017 related to the Cornerstone acquisition.

The following is a summary of the components of other non-interest expense for the periods indicated:

(Dollars in thousands)	Three months ended
	September 30,
	2017			2016
Data processing	$	368		$	154
Supplies		41			29
Telephone		91			89
Courier		26			23
Correspondent services		56			81
Insurance		111			68
Postage		16			45
Legal and professional fees		185			236
Loss on limited partnership interest		16			48
Director fees		82			83
Shareholder expense		32			34
Dues		36			30
Subscriptions		2			33
Loan closing costs/fees		(67	)		72
Other		354			202
	$	1,349		$	1,227

Income Tax Expense

Our effective tax rate was 26.9% and 26.3% in the third quarter of 2017 and 2016, respectively. As a result, of our current level of tax exempt securities in our investment portfolio and our BOLI holdings, the effective tax rate is expected to be 27.0% to 28.0% throughout the remainder of 2017.

Financial Position

Assets totaled $914.2 million at September 30, 2017 as compared to $914.8 million at December 31, 2016. Loans increased by approximately $21.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Loans (excluding loans held for sale) at September 30, 2017 were $568.5 million as compared to $546.7 million at December 31, 2016. Total loan production was $66.0 million during the first nine months of 2017. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, loans (excluding loans held for sale) accounted for 65.8% and 65.5% of earning assets, respectively. The loan-to-deposit ratio at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was 74.6% and 72.1%, respectively. Investment securities decreased to $248.7 million at September 30, 2017 from $272.4 million at December 31, 2016. Deposits increased $6.5 million to $770.1 million at September 30, 2017 as compared to $766.6 million at December 31, 2016. Pure deposits (deposits less time deposits) represented 78.6% of total deposits as of September 30, 2017 as compared to 76.4% at December 31, 2016. We continue to focus on growing our pure deposits as a percentage of total deposits in order to better manage our overall cost of funds. One of our goals as a community bank has been, and continues to be, to grow our assets through quality loan growth by providing credit to small and mid-size businesses and individuals within the markets we serve. A slowing economy or a return to recessionary national and local economic conditions as well as deterioration of asset quality within our Company could significantly impact our ability to grow our loan portfolio.

The following table shows the composition of the loan portfolio by category at the dates indicated:

(Dollars in thousands)	September 30,2017						December 31, 2016
	Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	44,917			7.9	%	$	42,704			7.8	%
Real estate:
Construction		42,693			7.5	%		45,746			8.4	%
Mortgage-residential		44,567			7.8	%		47,472			8.7	%
Mortgage-commercial		398,777			70.1	%		371,112			67.9	%
Consumer:
Home equity		29,984			5.3	%		31,368			5.7	%
Other		7,550			1.3	%		8,307			1.5	%
Total gross loans		568,488			100.0	%		546,709			100.0	%
Allowance for loan loss		(5,656	)					(5,214	)
Total net loans	$	562,832					$	541,495

In the context of this discussion, a real estate mortgage loan is defined as any loan, other than loans for construction purposes and advances on home equity lines of credit, secured by real estate, regardless of the purpose of the loan. Advances on home equity lines of credit are included in consumer loans. We follow the common practice of financial institutions in our market areas of obtaining a security interest in real estate whenever possible, in addition to any other available collateral. This collateral is taken to reinforce the likelihood of the ultimate repayment of the loan and tends to increase the magnitude of the real estate loan components. Generally we limit the loan-to-value ratio to 80%.

Market Risk Management

The effective management of market risk is essential to achieving our strategic financial objectives. Our most significant market risk is interest rate risk. We have established an Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) to monitor and manage interest rate risk. The ALCO monitors and manages the pricing and maturity of assets and liabilities in order to diminish the potential adverse impact that changes in interest rates could have on net interest income. The ALCO has established policy guidelines and strategies with respect to interest rate risk exposure and liquidity.

A monitoring technique employed by the ALCO is the measurement of interest sensitivity “gap,” which is the positive or negative dollar difference between assets and liabilities that are subject to interest rate repricing within a given period of time. Simulation modeling is performed to assess the impact varying interest rates and balance sheet mix assumptions will have on net interest income. We model the impact on net interest income for several different changes, to include a flattening, steepening and parallel shift in the yield curve. For each of these scenarios, we model the impact on net interest income in an increasing and decreasing rate environment of 100 and 200 basis points. Policies have been established in an effort to maintain the maximum anticipated negative impact of these modeled changes in net interest income at no more than 10% and 15% in a 100 and 200 basis point change in interest rates, respectively, over a twelve month period. Interest rate sensitivity can be managed by repricing assets or liabilities, selling securities available-for-sale, replacing an asset or liability at maturity or by adjusting the interest rate during the life of an asset or liability. Managing the amount of assets and liabilities repricing in the same time interval helps to hedge the risk and minimize the impact on net interest income of rising or falling interest rates.

We are currently asset sensitive within one year. However, neither the “gap” analysis nor asset/liability simulation modeling is a precise indicator of our interest sensitivity position due to the many factors that affect net interest income, including changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

Based on the many factors and assumptions used in simulating the effect of changes in interest rates, the following table estimates the percentage change in net interest income at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 over twelve months.

Net Interest Income Sensitivity

Change in short-term interest rates	Hypothetical percentage change in net interest income
	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
+200bp		-1.77	%		0.08	%
+100bp		-0.50	%		0.37	%
Flat		—			—
-100bp		-2.15	%		-2.81	%
-200bp		-6.90	%		-7.69	%

The decrease in net interest income in a down 200 basis point environment primarily results from the current level of interest rates being paid on our interest bearing transaction accounts as well as money market accounts. The interest rates on these accounts are at a level where they cannot be repriced in proportion to the change in interest rates. At the current historically low interest rate levels, we believe that a downward shift of 200 basis points across the entire yield curve is unlikely.

We also perform a valuation analysis projecting future cash flows from assets and liabilities to determine the Present Value of Equity (“PVE”) over a range of changes in market interest rates. The sensitivity of PVE to changes in interest rates is a measure of the sensitivity of earnings over a longer time horizon. At September 30, 2017, the PVE exposure in a plus 200 basis point increase in market interest rates was estimated to be -0.42% as compared to 0.78% at December 31, 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe our liquidity remains adequate to meet operating and loan funding requirements. Interest-bearing bank balances, federal funds sold, and investment securities available-for-sale represent 26.7% of total assets at September 30, 2017. We believe that our existing stable base of core deposits along with continued growth in this deposit base will enable us to meet our long-term and short-term liquidity needs successfully. These needs include the ability to respond to short-term demand for funds caused by the withdrawal of deposits, maturity of repurchase agreements, extensions of credit and the payment of operating expenses. Other sources of liquidity, in addition to deposit gathering activities, include maturing loans and investments, purchase of federal funds from other financial institutions and selling securities under agreements to repurchase. We monitor closely the level of large certificates of deposits in amounts of $100 thousand or more as they tend to be more sensitive to interest rate changes and, thus, less reliable sources of funding for liquidity purposes. At September 30, 2017, the amount of time deposits of $100 thousand or more represented 10.5% of total deposits and the amount of time deposits of $250 thousand or more represented 4.7% of deposits. The majority of these deposits are issued to local customers many of whom have other product relationships with the Bank.

Through the operations of our Bank, we have made contractual commitments to extend credit in the ordinary course of our business activities. These commitments are legally binding agreements to lend money to our customers at predetermined interest rates for a specified period of time. At September 30, 2017, we had issued commitments to extend credit of $93.2 million, including $35.3 million in unused home equity lines of credit, through various types of lending arrangements. We evaluate each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial and residential real estate. We manage the credit risk on these commitments by subjecting them to normal underwriting and risk management processes.

Other than as described elsewhere in this report, we are not aware of any trends, events or uncertainties that we expect to result in a significant adverse effect on our liquidity position. However, no assurances can be given in this regard, as rapid growth, deterioration in loan quality, and poor earnings, or a combination of these factors, could change the liquidity position in a relatively short period of time.

The Company has generally maintained a high level of liquidity and adequate capital, which along with continued retained earnings, we believe will be sufficient to fund the operations of the Bank for at least the next 12 months. Shareholders’ equity was 9.7% of total assets at September 30, 2017 and 8.9% at December 31, 2016. The Bank maintains federal funds purchased lines in the total amount of $20.0 million with two financial institutions, although these were not utilized in the first quarter of 2017. The FHLB of Atlanta has approved a line of credit of up to 25% of the Bank’s assets, which when utilized is collateralized by a pledge against specific investment securities and/or eligible loans. We regularly review the liquidity position of the Company and have implemented internal policies establishing guidelines for sources of asset based liquidity and evaluate and monitor the total amount of purchased funds used to support the balance sheet and funding from noncore sources. We believe that our existing stable base of core deposits along with continued growth in this deposit base will enable us to meet our long term liquidity needs successfully.

Regulatory capital rules released by the federal bank regulatory agencies in July 2013 to implement capital standards, referred to as Basel III and developed by an international body known as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, impose higher minimum capital requirements for bank holding companies and banks. The regulatory capital rules became effective for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015 (subject to a phase-in period for certain provisions), and all of the requirements in the rules will be fully phased in by January 1, 2019.

The final rule includes certain new and higher risk-based capital and leverage requirements than those previously in place. Specifically, the following minimum capital requirements apply to us:

a new Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5%;

a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% (increased from the former 4% requirement);

a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from former requirements); and

a leverage ratio of 4% (also unchanged from the former requirement).

Under the rules, Tier 1 capital is redefined to include two components: Common Equity Tier 1 capital and additional Tier 1 capital. The new and highest form of capital, Common Equity Tier 1 capital, consists solely of common stock (plus related surplus), retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income, and limited amounts of minority interests that are in the form of common stock. Additional Tier 1 capital includes other perpetual instruments historically included in Tier 1 capital, such as noncumulative perpetual preferred stock. The rules permit bank holding companies with less than $15 billion in total consolidated assets to continue to include trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock issued before May 19, 2010 in Tier 1 capital, but not in Common Equity Tier 1 capital, subject to certain restrictions. Tier 2 capital consists of instruments that currently qualify in Tier 2 capital plus instruments that the rules have disqualified from Tier 1 capital treatment. Cumulative perpetual preferred stock, formerly includable in Tier 1 capital, is now included only in Tier 2 capital. Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) is presumptively included in Common Equity Tier 1 capital and often would operate to reduce this category of capital. The rules provided a one-time opportunity at the end of the first quarter of 2015 for covered banking organizations to opt out of much of this treatment of AOCI. We elected to opt out from the inclusion of AOCI in Common Equity Tier 1 capital.

In addition, in order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions or discretionary bonus payments to executives, a covered banking organization must maintain a “capital conservation buffer” on top of its minimum risk-based capital requirements. This buffer must consist solely of Tier 1 Common Equity, but the buffer applies to all three measurements (Common Equity Tier 1, Tier 1 capital and total capital). The capital conservation buffer will be phased in incrementally over time, becoming fully effective on January 1, 2019, and will consist of an additional amount of common equity equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. As of January 1, 2017, we are required to hold a capital conservation buffer of 1.25%, increasing by that amount each successive year until 2019.

In general, the rules have had the effect of increasing capital requirements by increasing the risk weights on certain assets, including high volatility commercial real estate, certain loans past due 90 days or more or in nonaccrual status, mortgage servicing rights not includable in Common Equity Tier 1 capital, equity exposures, and claims on securities firms, that are used in the denominator of the three risk-based capital ratios.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements under the rules on a fully phased-in basis if such requirements had been effective at that time. The Bank’s risk-based capital ratios of leverage ratio, Tier 1, and total capital were 10.1%, 14.1% and 14.9%, respectively, at September 30, 2017 as compared to 9.8%, 13.8%, and 14.7%, respectively, at December 31, 2016. The Bank’s CET1 ratio at September 30, 2017 was 14.1% and 13.8% at December 31, 2016. The Company’s risk-based capital ratios of leverage ratio, Tier 1, and total capital were 10.5%, 14.7% and 15.6%, respectively, at September 30, 2017 as compared to 10.2%, 14.5% and 15.3%, respectively, at December 31, 2016. The Company’s CET1 ratio at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was 12.5% and 12.2%, respectively. Our management anticipates that the Bank and the Company will remain a well-capitalized institution for at least the next 12 months.

Since the Company is a bank holding company, its ability to declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain federal and state regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends by bank holding companies. In general, the Federal Reserve Board’s policies provide that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the bank holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve Board’s policies also require that a bank holding company serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks by standing ready to use available resources to provide adequate capital funds to those banks during periods of financial stress or adversity and by maintaining the financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks where necessary. In addition, under the prompt corrective action regulations, the ability of a bank holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary bank becomes undercapitalized. These regulatory policies could affect the ability of the Company to pay dividends or otherwise engage in capital distributions.

In addition, since the Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank and does not conduct stand-alone operations, its ability to pay dividends depends on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to it, which is also subject to regulatory restrictions. As a South Carolina chartered bank, the Bank is subject to limitations on the amount of dividends that it is permitted to pay. Unless otherwise instructed by the South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions, the Bank is generally permitted under South Carolina State banking regulations to pay cash dividends of up to 100% of net income in any calendar year without obtaining the prior approval of the South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions. The FDIC also has the authority under federal law to enjoin a bank from engaging in what in its opinion constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business, including the payment of a dividend under certain circumstances.

FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
Yields on Average Earning Assets and Rates
on Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities

	Nine months ended September 30, 2017								Nine months ended September 30, 2016
	Average			Interest		Yield/			Average			Interest		Yield/
	Balance			Earned/Paid		Rate			Balance			Earned/Paid		Rate
Assets
Earning assets
Loans	$	561,844		$	19,003		4.52	%	$	507,326		$	17,582		4.63	%
Securities:		261,728			4,319		2.21	%		284,241			4,331		2.04	%
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell		13,438			94		0.94	%		18,813			83		0.59	%
Total earning assets		837,010			23,416		3.74	%		810,380			21,996		3.63	%
Cash and due from banks		11,253								10,735
Premises and equipment		30,512								30,136
Other assets		37,681								35,854
Allowance for loan losses		(5,414	)							(4,787	)
Total assets	$	911,042							$	882,318

Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest-bearing transaction accounts	$	158,206		$	143		0.12	%	$	151,989		$	132		0.12	%
Money market accounts		168,153			320		0.25	%		165,240			323		0.26	%
Savings deposits		74,123			63		0.11	%		67,050			59		0.12	%
Time deposits		172,418			815		0.63	%		179,454			844		0.63	%
Other borrowings		54,461			739		1.81	%		61,201			973		2.12	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		627,361			2,080		0.44	%		624,934			2,331		0.50	%
Demand deposits		191,930								168,520
Other liabilities		7,026								6,505
Shareholders’ equity		84,725								82,359
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	911,042							$	882,318

Cost of funds, including demand deposits							0.34	%							0.39	%
Net interest spread							3.30	%							3.13	%
Net interest income/margin				$	21,336		3.41	%				$	19,665		3.24	%
Net interest income/margin FTE basis	$	642		$	21,978		3.51	%	$	648		$	20,313		3.35	%

FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
Yields on Average Earning Assets and Rates
on Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities

	Three months ended September 30, 2017								Three months ended September 30, 2016
	Average			Interest		Yield/			Average			Interest		Yield/
	Balance			Earned/Paid		Rate			Balance			Earned/Paid		Rate
Assets
Earning assets
Loans	$	569,461		$	6,438		4.49	%	$	520,130		$	5,977		4.57	%
Securities:		254,401			1,442		2.25	%		286,330			1,389		1.93	%
Federal funds sold and securities purchased		14,717			41		1.11	%		23,301			34		0.58	%
Total earning assets		838,579			7,921		3.75	%		829,761			7,400		3.55	%
Cash and due from banks		10,229								10,927
Premises and equipment		30,684								30,088
Other assets		37,272								35,062
Allowance for loan losses		(5,547	)							(4,945	)
Total assets	$	911,217							$	900,893

Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest-bearing transaction accounts	$	157,329		$	58		0.15	%	$	151,778		$	43		0.11	%
Money market accounts		168,380			109		0.26	%		165,290			105		0.25	%
Savings deposits		75,392			21		0.11	%		74,986			23		0.12	%
Time deposits		167,017			271		0.64	%		182,716			294		0.64	%
Other borrowings		52,139			235		1.79	%		58,254			284		1.94	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		620,257			694		0.44	%		633,024			749		0.47	%
Demand deposits		197,281								176,734
Other liabilities		7,455								6,686
Shareholders’ equity		86,224								84,449
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	911,217							$	900,893

Cost of funds, including demand deposits							0.34	%							0.37	%
Net interest spread							3.31	%							3.08	%
Net interest income/margin				$	7,227		3.42	%				$	6,651		3.19	%
Net interest income/margin FTE basis	$	209		$	7,436		3.52	%	$	216		$	6,867		3.29	%

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

There have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk as of September 30, 2017 from that presented in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. See the “Market Risk Management” subsection in Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The design of any system of controls and procedures is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II -

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are a party to claims and lawsuits arising in the course of normal business activities. Management is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings against the Company which, if determined adversely, the Company believes would have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Not Applicable.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Not Applicable.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not Applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit

Description

31.1

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Executive Officer.

31.2

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Financial Officer.

Section 1350 Certifications

101

The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL); (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
	(REGISTRANT)

Date: November 6, 2017	By:	/s/ Michael C. Crapps
		Michael C. Crapps
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 6, 2017	By:	/s/ Joseph G. Sawyer
		Joseph G. Sawyer
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Executive Officer.

31.2

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Financial Officer.

Section 1350 Certifications.

101