FRT-06.30.2014-10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
|
| |
ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO THE SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
OR
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-07533
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Declaration of Trust)
|
| | |
Maryland | | 52-0782497 |
(State of Organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| |
1626 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, Maryland | | 20852 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(301) 998-8100
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ý Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | |
Large Accelerated Filer | ý | Accelerated Filer | ¨ |
| | | |
Non-Accelerated Filer | o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes ý No
The number of Registrant’s common shares outstanding on August 4, 2014 was 67,718,240.
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
Item 1. | Financial Statements | |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2014 (unaudited) and December 31, 2013 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 | |
| Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 | |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) | |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | |
| | |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | |
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | |
Item 5. | Other Information | |
Item 6. | Exhibits | |
| |
SIGNATURES | |
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| |
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
The following balance sheet as of December 31, 2013, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented have been included. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, | | December 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands, except share data) |
| (Unaudited) | | |
ASSETS | | | |
Real estate, at cost | | | |
Operating (including $281,311 and $265,138 of consolidated variable interest entities, respectively) | $ | 5,004,993 |
| | $ | 4,618,258 |
|
Construction-in-progress | 472,570 |
| | 531,205 |
|
| 5,477,563 |
| | 5,149,463 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (including $22,840 and $19,086 of consolidated variable interest entities, respectively) | (1,417,376 | ) | | (1,350,471 | ) |
Net real estate | 4,060,187 |
| | 3,798,992 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | 41,312 |
| | 88,927 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net | 97,741 |
| | 84,838 |
|
Mortgage notes receivable, net | 54,932 |
| | 55,155 |
|
Investment in real estate partnership | 35,511 |
| | 32,264 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 128,564 |
| | 145,062 |
|
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $10,969 and $9,535, respectively | 13,238 |
| | 14,056 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 4,431,485 |
| | $ | 4,219,294 |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
Liabilities | | | |
Mortgages payable (including $188,739 and $202,782 of consolidated variable interest entities, respectively) | $ | 634,045 |
| | $ | 588,456 |
|
Capital lease obligations | 71,659 |
| | 71,671 |
|
Notes payable | 290,765 |
| | 300,822 |
|
Senior notes and debentures | 1,361,282 |
| | 1,360,913 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 168,615 |
| | 156,270 |
|
Dividends payable | 53,631 |
| | 52,385 |
|
Security deposits payable | 13,502 |
| | 12,772 |
|
Other liabilities and deferred credits | 109,242 |
| | 100,283 |
|
Total liabilities | 2,702,741 |
| | 2,643,572 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) |
| |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests | 110,688 |
| | 104,425 |
|
Shareholders’ equity | | | |
Preferred shares, authorized 15,000,000 shares, $.01 par: 5.417% Series 1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares, (stated at liquidation preference $25 per share), 399,896 shares issued and outstanding | 9,997 |
| | 9,997 |
|
Common shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 67,712,366 and 66,701,422 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | 678 |
| | 667 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 2,170,152 |
| | 2,062,708 |
|
Accumulated dividends in excess of net income | (647,006 | ) | | (623,795 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (4,060 | ) | | (1,417 | ) |
Total shareholders’ equity of the Trust | 1,529,761 |
| | 1,448,160 |
|
Noncontrolling interests | 88,295 |
| | 23,137 |
|
Total shareholders’ equity | 1,618,056 |
| | 1,471,297 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | 4,431,485 |
| | $ | 4,219,294 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands, except per share data) |
REVENUE | | | | | | | |
Rental income | $ | 162,383 |
| | $ | 153,212 |
| | $ | 328,576 |
| | $ | 305,828 |
|
Other property income | 4,325 |
| | 2,913 |
| | 7,725 |
| | 6,181 |
|
Mortgage interest income | 1,239 |
| | 1,263 |
| | 2,474 |
| | 2,528 |
|
Total revenue | 167,947 |
| | 157,388 |
| | 338,775 |
| | 314,537 |
|
EXPENSES | | | | | | | |
Rental expenses | 31,405 |
| | 28,209 |
| | 68,535 |
| | 57,710 |
|
Real estate taxes | 19,164 |
| | 17,632 |
| | 37,864 |
| | 35,204 |
|
General and administrative | 8,124 |
| | 8,302 |
| | 15,828 |
| | 15,359 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 40,893 |
| | 39,757 |
| | 84,743 |
| | 80,274 |
|
Total operating expenses | 99,586 |
| | 93,900 |
| | 206,970 |
| | 188,547 |
|
OPERATING INCOME | 68,361 |
| | 63,488 |
| | 131,805 |
| | 125,990 |
|
Other interest income | 18 |
| | 65 |
| | 43 |
| | 95 |
|
Interest expense | (23,213 | ) | | (27,147 | ) | | (46,350 | ) | | (54,552 | ) |
Early extinguishment of debt | — |
| | (3,399 | ) | | — |
| | (3,399 | ) |
Income from real estate partnership | 250 |
| | 372 |
| | 463 |
| | 684 |
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | 45,416 |
| | 33,379 |
| | 85,961 |
| | 68,818 |
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | | | | | | | |
Discontinued operations - income | — |
| | 424 |
| | — |
| | 827 |
|
INCOME BEFORE GAIN ON SALE OF REAL ESTATE | 45,416 |
| | 33,803 |
| | 85,961 |
| | 69,645 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate | — |
| | 4,994 |
| | — |
| | 4,994 |
|
NET INCOME | 45,416 |
| | 38,797 |
| | 85,961 |
| | 74,639 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (1,871 | ) | | (1,258 | ) | | (3,663 | ) | | (2,512 | ) |
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE TRUST | 43,545 |
| | 37,539 |
| | 82,298 |
| | 72,127 |
|
Dividends on preferred shares | (135 | ) | | (135 | ) | | (271 | ) | | (271 | ) |
NET INCOME AVAILABLE FOR COMMON SHAREHOLDERS | $ | 43,410 |
| | $ | 37,404 |
| | $ | 82,027 |
| | $ | 71,856 |
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE, BASIC | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 1.01 |
|
Discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.01 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate | — |
| | 0.08 |
| | — |
| | 0.08 |
|
| $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 1.10 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares, basic | 67,110 |
| | 65,149 |
| | 66,858 |
| | 64,922 |
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE, DILUTED | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 1.01 |
|
Discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.01 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate | — |
| | 0.08 |
| | — |
| | 0.08 |
|
| $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 1.10 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares, diluted | 67,277 |
| | 65,311 |
| | 67,021 |
| | 65,080 |
|
| | | | | | | |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | $ | 43,316 |
| | $ | 47,202 |
| | $ | 83,318 |
| | $ | 84,659 |
|
| | | | | | | |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE TRUST | $ | 41,445 |
| | $ | 45,944 |
| | $ | 79,655 |
| | $ | 82,147 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shareholders’ Equity of the Trust | | | | |
| Preferred Shares | | Common Shares | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Accumulated Dividends in Excess of Net Income | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Shareholders' Equity |
| Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except share data) |
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2013 | 399,896 |
|
|
| $ | 9,997 |
| | 66,701,422 |
| | $ | 667 |
| | $ | 2,062,708 |
| | $ | (623,795 | ) | | $ | (1,417 | ) | | $ | 23,137 |
| | $ | 1,471,297 |
|
Net income, excluding $1,640 attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 82,298 |
| | — |
| | 2,023 |
| | 84,321 |
|
Other comprehensive loss - change in value of interest rate swaps | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,643 | ) | | — |
| | (2,643 | ) |
Dividends declared to common shareholders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (105,238 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (105,238 | ) |
Dividends declared to preferred shareholders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (271 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (271 | ) |
Distributions declared to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,201 | ) | | (2,201 | ) |
Common shares issued | — |
| | — |
| | 896,545 |
| | 9 |
| | 102,330 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 102,339 |
|
Exercise of stock options | — |
| | — |
| | 19,610 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,460 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,461 |
|
Shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan | — |
| | — |
| | 9,443 |
| | — |
| | 1,031 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,031 |
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | — |
| | — |
| | 85,346 |
| | 1 |
| | 3,291 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,292 |
|
Redemption of OP units | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (39 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (14 | ) | | (53 | ) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 65,350 |
| | 65,350 |
|
Adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | (629 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (629 | ) |
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2014 | 399,896 |
| | $ | 9,997 |
| | 67,712,366 |
| | $ | 678 |
| | $ | 2,170,152 |
| | $ | (647,006 | ) | | $ | (4,060 | ) | | $ | 88,295 |
| | $ | 1,618,056 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands) |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |
Net income | $ | 85,961 |
| | $ | 74,639 |
|
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities | | | |
Depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations | 84,743 |
| | 80,477 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate | — |
| | (4,994 | ) |
Income from real estate partnership | (463 | ) | | (684 | ) |
Other, net | 2,348 |
| | 2,128 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and dispositions: | | | |
Increase in accounts receivable | (10,839 | ) | | (7,756 | ) |
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets | 8,175 |
| | 7,683 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses | 967 |
| | (406 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in security deposits and other liabilities | 1,177 |
| | (4,391 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 172,069 |
| | 146,696 |
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | |
Acquisition of real estate | (4,352 | ) | | (47,202 | ) |
Capital expenditures - development and redevelopment | (154,732 | ) | | (93,290 | ) |
Capital expenditures - other | (20,280 | ) | | (20,014 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of real estate | — |
| | 8,608 |
|
Investment in real estate partnership | (3,581 | ) | | — |
|
Distribution from real estate partnership in excess of earnings | 301 |
| | 68 |
|
Leasing costs | (8,118 | ) | | (6,609 | ) |
Repayment of mortgage and other notes receivable, net | 640 |
| | 261 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (190,122 | ) | | (158,178 | ) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | |
Costs to upsize and extend revolving credit facility | — |
| | (1,929 | ) |
Issuance of senior notes, net of costs | — |
| | 269,343 |
|
Redemption and retirement of senior notes | — |
| | (135,000 | ) |
Repayment of mortgages, capital leases and notes payable | (26,097 | ) | | (34,505 | ) |
Issuance of common shares | 103,931 |
| | 83,220 |
|
Dividends paid to common and preferred shareholders | (103,856 | ) | | (94,196 | ) |
Distributions to and redemptions of noncontrolling interests | (3,540 | ) | | (4,073 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (29,562 | ) | | 82,860 |
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (47,615 | ) | | 71,378 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 88,927 |
| | 36,988 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 41,312 |
| | $ | 108,366 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2014
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1—BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION
Federal Realty Investment Trust (the “Trust”) is an equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in the ownership, management, and redevelopment of retail and mixed-use properties. Our properties are located primarily in densely populated and affluent communities in strategically selected metropolitan markets in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions of the United States, and California. As of June 30, 2014, we owned or had a majority interest in community and neighborhood shopping centers and mixed-use properties which are operated as 89 predominantly retail real estate projects.
We operate in a manner intended to enable us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. A REIT that distributes at least 90% of its taxable income to its shareholders each year and meets certain other conditions is not taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to its shareholders. Therefore, federal income taxes on our taxable income have been and are generally expected to be immaterial. We are obligated to pay state taxes, generally consisting of franchise or gross receipts taxes in certain states. Such state taxes also have not been material.
NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Trust, its corporate subsidiaries, and all entities in which the Trust has a controlling interest or has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The equity interests of other investors are reflected as noncontrolling interests or redeemable noncontrolling interests. All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. We account for our interests in joint ventures, which we do not control, using the equity method of accounting. Certain 2013 amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, referred to as “GAAP,” requires management to make estimates and assumptions that in certain circumstances affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses. These estimates are prepared using management’s best judgment, after considering past, current and expected events and economic conditions. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” ASU 2014-08 amends the definition of a discontinued operation to include only the disposal of a component of an entity that represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major impact on an entity’s operations and financial results. The standard also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactions that do not meet the discontinued operations criteria. The standard is applicable prospectively for all disposals initially classified as held for sale in periods after adoption. We adopted the standard effective January 1, 2014, and there was no impact to the current period financial statements. In future periods, the adoption will result in most individual property disposals not qualifying for discontinued operations presentation and thus, the results of those disposals will remain in “income from continuing operations.” Properties sold prior to January 1, 2014, are not subject to ASU 2014-08 and therefore, continue to be classified as discontinued operations using the previous definition.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." ASU 2014-09 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP and replaces it with a core revenue recognition principle, that an entity will recognize revenue when it transfers control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services, and creates a five-step model for revenue recognition in accordance with this principle. ASU 2014-09 also requires new disclosures in both interim and annual reporting periods. The guidance in ASU 2014-09 does not apply to contracts within the scope of ASC 840, Leases. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for us in the first quarter of 2017 and allows for either full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption. We are currently assessing the impact of this standard to our consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Supplemental Disclosures
The following table provides supplemental disclosures related to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended |
| June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES: | | | |
Total interest costs incurred | $ | 57,364 |
| | $ | 61,155 |
|
Interest capitalized | (11,014 | ) | | (6,603 | ) |
Interest expense | $ | 46,350 |
| | $ | 54,552 |
|
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized | $ | 40,855 |
| | $ | 57,410 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 309 |
| | $ | 378 |
|
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING TRANSACTIONS: | | | |
Mortgage loans assumed with acquisition | $ | 68,282 |
| | $ | — |
|
Mortgage loan refinanced | $ | 11,500 |
| | $ | — |
|
Repayment of note payable with public funding/related construction-in-progress offset | $ | 10,000 |
| | $ | — |
|
Shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan | $ | 900 |
| | $ | 894 |
|
See Note 3 for additional disclosures relating to The Grove at Shrewsbury and Brook 35 acquisition.
NOTE 3—REAL ESTATE
Effective January 1, 2014, we acquired a controlling interest in The Grove at Shrewsbury, a 187,000 square foot shopping center in Shrewsbury, New Jersey, and Brook 35, a 99,000 square foot shopping center in Sea Girt, New Jersey for a gross value of $161 million. Our effective economic interest approximates 84% and was funded by the assumption of our share of $68 million of mortgage debt, 632,000 downREIT operating partnership units, and $13 million of cash (which was in an escrow account at December 31, 2013). Approximately $1.7 million and $2.3 million of net assets acquired were allocated to other assets for "above market leases" and other liabilities for "below market leases," respectively. Additionally, $71.1 million was allocated to redeemable and nonredeemable noncontrolling interests. We incurred $2.0 million of acquisition costs, of which $0.9 million were incurred in 2014 and included in "general and administrative expense" for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
We have entered into an agreement to acquire the interest of one of the noncontrolling interest holders in The Grove at Shrewsbury in 2015. As this noncontrolling interest is mandatorily redeemable, it has been classified as a liability of approximately $9 million and is included in "other liabilities and deferred credits" on the June 30, 2014 consolidated balance sheet. An additional noncontrolling interest holder has the right to require us to acquire its interests in The Grove at Shrewsbury and Brook 35 at the then current fair market value beginning on January 1, 2017.
NOTE 4—REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP
We have a joint venture arrangement (the “Partnership”) with affiliates of a discretionary fund created and advised by ING Clarion Partners (“Clarion”). We own 30% of the equity in the Partnership and Clarion owns 70%. We hold a general partnership interest, however, Clarion also holds a general partnership interest and has substantive participating rights. We cannot make significant decisions without Clarion’s approval. Accordingly, we account for our interest in the Partnership using the equity method. As of June 30, 2014, the Partnership owned seven retail real estate properties. We are the manager of the Partnership and its properties, earning fees for acquisitions, dispositions, management, leasing, and financing. Intercompany profit generated from fees is eliminated in consolidation. We also have the opportunity to receive performance-based earnings through our Partnership interest. Accounting policies for the Partnership are similar to accounting policies followed by the Trust. The Partnership is subject to a buy-sell provision which is customary for real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. Either partner may initiate this provision at any time, which could result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire Clarion’s interest.
The following tables provide summarized operating results and the financial position of the Partnership:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| June 30, | | June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands) |
OPERATING RESULTS | | | | | | | |
Revenue | $ | 4,469 |
| | $ | 4,624 |
| | $ | 9,487 |
| | $ | 9,573 |
|
Expenses | | | | | | | |
Other operating expenses | 1,390 |
| | 1,318 |
| | 3,500 |
| | 3,135 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 1,590 |
| | 1,361 |
| | 3,077 |
| | 2,730 |
|
Interest expense | 781 |
| | 841 |
| | 1,620 |
| | 1,683 |
|
Total expenses | 3,761 |
| | 3,520 |
| | 8,197 |
| | 7,548 |
|
Net income | $ | 708 |
| | $ | 1,104 |
| | $ | 1,290 |
| | $ | 2,025 |
|
Our share of net income from real estate partnership | $ | 250 |
| | $ | 372 |
| | $ | 463 |
| | $ | 684 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, | | December 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands) |
BALANCE SHEETS | | | |
Real estate, net | $ | 169,193 |
| | $ | 170,867 |
|
Cash | 3,046 |
| | 2,210 |
|
Other assets | 5,170 |
| | 5,668 |
|
Total assets | $ | 177,409 |
| | $ | 178,745 |
|
Mortgages payable | $ | 44,885 |
| | $ | 56,922 |
|
Other liabilities | 3,937 |
| | 4,100 |
|
Partners’ capital | 128,587 |
| | 117,723 |
|
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 177,409 |
| | $ | 178,745 |
|
Our share of unconsolidated debt | $ | 13,466 |
| | $ | 17,077 |
|
Our investment in real estate partnership | $ | 35,511 |
| | $ | 32,264 |
|
On June 5, 2014, the Partnership repaid an $11.9 million mortgage loan secured by one of its properties at par prior to the original maturity date of July 5, 2014. Both partners made additional capital contributions totaling $11.9 million to repay the mortgage loan, of which our contribution was $3.6 million.
NOTE 5—DEBT
In connection with the acquisition of The Grove at Shrewsbury and Brook 35 on January 1, 2014, we assumed mortgage loans with a face amount of $68.3 million and a fair value of $73.8 million. The mortgage loans are secured by the individual properties with the following contractual terms:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Principal | | Stated Interest Rate | | Maturity Date |
| (In millions) | | | | |
Brook 35 | $ | 11.5 |
| | 5.46 | % | | July 1, 2014 |
The Grove at Shrewsbury (East) | 45.4 |
| | 5.82 | % | | October 1, 2017 |
The Grove at Shrewsbury (West) | 11.4 |
| | 6.38 | % | | March 1, 2018 |
On June 2, 2014 we refinanced the above mortgage loan on Brook 35 at a face amount of $11.5 million. The new mortgage loan bears interest at 4.65% and matures on July 1, 2029.
On June 3, 2014 we repaid the mortgage loan on Melville Mall prior to its original maturity date at par for $20.3 million. The loan had an original maturity date of September 1, 2014.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the maximum amount of borrowings outstanding under our $600.0 million revolving credit facility was $19.0 million, the weighted average borrowings outstanding was $4.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and the weighted average interest rate, before amortization of debt fees, was 1.04% and 1.05%, respectively. At June 30, 2014, there was no balance outstanding. Our revolving credit facility, term loan and certain notes require us to comply with various financial covenants, including the maintenance of minimum shareholders’ equity and debt coverage ratios and a maximum ratio of debt to net worth. As of June 30, 2014, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.
NOTE 6—FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Except as disclosed below, the carrying amount of our financial instruments approximates their fair value. The fair value of our mortgages payable, notes payable and senior notes and debentures is sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. Quoted market prices (Level 1) were used to estimate the fair value of our marketable senior notes and debentures and discounted cash flow analysis (Level 2) is generally used to estimate the fair value of our mortgages and notes payable. Considerable judgment is necessary to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. The estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized upon disposition of the financial instruments. A summary of the carrying amount and fair value of our mortgages payable, notes payable and senior notes and debentures is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value |
(In thousands) |
Mortgages and notes payable | $ | 924,810 |
| | $ | 941,366 |
| | $ | 889,278 |
| | $ | 912,251 |
|
Senior notes and debentures | $ | 1,361,282 |
| | $ | 1,443,172 |
| | $ | 1,360,913 |
| | $ | 1,397,731 |
|
As of June 30, 2014, we have two interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $275.0 million that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The interest rate swap agreements fix the variable portion of our $275.0 million term loan at 1.72% through November 1, 2018, and effectively fix the rate of the term loan at 3.02%. We assess effectiveness of our cash flow hedges both at inception and on an ongoing basis. The effective portion of changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps associated with our cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and is subsequently reclassified into interest expense as interest is incurred on the related variable rate debt. Within the next 12 months, we expect to reclassify an estimated $4.2 million as an increase to interest expense. Our cash flow hedges become ineffective if critical terms of the hedging instrument and the debt instrument do not perfectly match such as notional amounts, settlement dates, reset dates, calculation period and LIBOR rate. In addition, we evaluate the default risk of the counterparty by monitoring the credit-worthiness of the counterparty. When ineffectiveness exists, the ineffective portion of changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps associated with our cash flow hedges is recognized in earnings in the period affected. Hedge ineffectiveness has not impacted earnings as of June 30, 2014, and we do not anticipate it will have a significant effect in the future.
The fair values of the interest rate swap agreements are based on the estimated amounts we would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date and are determined using interest rate pricing models and interest rate related observable inputs. The fair value of our swaps at June 30, 2014 was a liability of $4.1 million and is included in "accounts payable and accrued expenses" on our consolidated balance sheet. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the change in valuation on our interest rate swaps was $2.1 million and $2.6 million, respectively, (including $1.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, reclassified from other comprehensive loss to interest expense) and is included in "accumulated other comprehensive loss."
A summary of our financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by level within the fair value hierarchy is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| (In thousands) |
Interest rate swaps | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,060 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,060 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,417 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,417 |
|
NOTE 7—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are sometimes involved in lawsuits, warranty claims, and environmental matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Management makes assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any potential loss relating to these matters.
We are currently a party to various legal proceedings. We accrue a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and a reasonable estimate of the loss is a range, we accrue the best estimate within the range; however, if no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, the minimum within the range is accrued. Legal fees related to litigation are expensed as incurred. We do not believe that the ultimate outcome of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or overall trends in results of operations; however, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. Also under our leases, tenants are typically obligated to indemnify us from and against all liabilities, costs and expenses imposed upon or asserted against us (1) as owner of the properties due to certain matters relating to the operation of the properties by the tenant, and (2) where appropriate, due to certain matters relating to the ownership of the properties prior to their acquisition by us.
Under the terms of certain partnership agreements, the partners have the right to exchange their operating partnership units for cash or the same number of our common shares, at our option. A total of 917,255 downREIT operating partnership units are outstanding which have a total fair value of $110.9 million, based on our closing stock price on June 30, 2014.
NOTE 8—SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
The following table provides a summary of dividends declared and paid per share:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| Declared | | Paid | | Declared | | Paid |
Common shares | $ | 1.560 |
| | $ | 1.560 |
| | $ | 1.460 |
| | $ | 1.460 |
|
5.417% Series 1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred shares | $ | 0.677 |
| | $ | 0.677 |
| | $ | 0.677 |
| | $ | 0.677 |
|
On February 12, 2014 we replaced our existing at the market (“ATM”) equity program with a new ATM equity program in which we may from time to time offer and sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. We intend to use the net proceeds to fund potential acquisition opportunities, fund our development and redevelopment pipeline, repay amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and/or for general corporate purposes. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, we issued 440,778 common shares at a weighted average price per share of $119.66 for net cash proceeds of $52.2 million and paid $0.5 million in commissions and less than $0.1 million in additional offering expenses related to the sales of these common shares. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we issued 896,490 common shares at a weighted average price per share of $115.44 for net cash proceeds of $102.3 million and paid $1.0 million in commissions and $0.1 million in additional offering expenses related to the sales of these common shares. As of June 30, 2014, we had the capacity to issue up to $196.5 million in common shares under our ATM equity program.
NOTE 9—COMPONENTS OF RENTAL INCOME
The principal components of rental income are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| June 30, | | June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands) |
Minimum rents | | | | | | | |
Retail and commercial | $ | 116,840 |
| | $ | 112,669 |
| | $ | 232,905 |
| | $ | 222,700 |
|
Residential | 8,532 |
| | 7,190 |
| | 16,354 |
| | 14,329 |
|
Cost reimbursement | 32,158 |
| | 28,658 |
| | 69,617 |
| | 59,486 |
|
Percentage rent | 2,045 |
| | 1,963 |
| | 4,168 |
| | 4,124 |
|
Other | 2,808 |
| | 2,732 |
| | 5,532 |
| | 5,189 |
|
Total rental income | $ | 162,383 |
| | $ | 153,212 |
| | $ | 328,576 |
| | $ | 305,828 |
|
Minimum rents include the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| June 30, | | June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In millions) |
Straight-line rents | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | 1.8 |
| | $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | 2.6 |
|
Amortization of above market leases | $ | (0.8 | ) | | $ | (0.7 | ) | | $ | (1.7 | ) | | $ | (1.5 | ) |
Amortization of below market leases | $ | 1.5 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
| | $ | 2.9 |
| | $ | 3.0 |
|
NOTE 10—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
During 2013 and prior to our adoption of ASU 2014-08 as further discussed in Note 2, certain disposal transactions were considered discontinued operations. A summary of the financial information for these discontinued operations is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2013 |
| (In millions) |
Revenue from discontinued operations | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
|
Income from discontinued operations | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
|
NOTE 11—SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
A summary of share-based compensation expense included in net income is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| June 30, | | June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands) |
Share-based compensation incurred | | | | | | | |
Grants of common shares | $ | 3,069 |
| | $ | 2,624 |
| | $ | 6,592 |
| | $ | 5,613 |
|
Grants of options | 1 |
| | 68 |
| | 36 |
| | 154 |
|
| 3,070 |
| | 2,692 |
| | 6,628 |
| | 5,767 |
|
Capitalized share-based compensation | (300 | ) | | (186 | ) | | (585 | ) | | (388 | ) |
Share-based compensation expense | $ | 2,770 |
| | $ | 2,506 |
| | $ | 6,043 |
| | $ | 5,379 |
|
NOTE 12—EARNINGS PER SHARE
We have calculated earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation methodology whereby EPS for each class of common stock and participating securities is calculated according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we had 0.3 million weighted average unvested shares outstanding, which are considered participating securities. Therefore, we have allocated our earnings for basic and diluted EPS between common shares and unvested shares; the portion of earnings allocated to the unvested shares is reflected as “earnings allocated to unvested shares” in the reconciliation below.
In the dilutive EPS calculation, dilutive stock options were calculated using the treasury stock method consistent with prior periods. There were no anti-dilutive stock options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The conversions of downREIT operating partnership units and 5.417% Series 1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares are anti-dilutive for all periods presented and accordingly, have been excluded from the weighted average common shares used to compute diluted EPS.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| June 30, | | June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands, except per share data) |
NUMERATOR | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | $ | 45,416 |
| | $ | 33,379 |
| | $ | 85,961 |
| | $ | 68,818 |
|
Less: Preferred share dividends | (135 | ) | | (135 | ) | | (271 | ) | | (271 | ) |
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests | (1,871 | ) | | (1,258 | ) | | (3,663 | ) | | (2,512 | ) |
Less: Earnings allocated to unvested shares | (237 | ) | | (214 | ) | | (475 | ) | | (428 | ) |
Income from continuing operations available for common shareholders | 43,173 |
| | 31,772 |
| | 81,552 |
| | 65,607 |
|
Results from discontinued operations attributable to the Trust | — |
| | 424 |
| | — |
| | 827 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate | — |
| | 4,994 |
| | — |
| | 4,994 |
|
Net income available for common shareholders, basic and diluted | $ | 43,173 |
| | $ | 37,190 |
| | $ | 81,552 |
| | $ | 71,428 |
|
DENOMINATOR | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic | 67,110 |
| | 65,149 |
| | 66,858 |
| | 64,922 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | |
Stock options | 167 |
| | 162 |
| | 163 |
| | 158 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted | 67,277 |
| | 65,311 |
| | 67,021 |
| | 65,080 |
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE, BASIC | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 1.01 |
|
Discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.01 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate | — |
| | 0.08 |
| | — |
| | 0.08 |
|
| $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 1.10 |
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE, DILUTED | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 1.01 |
|
Discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.01 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate | — |
| | 0.08 |
| | — |
| | 0.08 |
|
| $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 1.10 |
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to the Trust | $ | 43,545 |
| | $ | 32,121 |
| | $ | 82,298 |
| | $ | 66,306 |
|
NOTE 13—SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 24, 2014, our Partnership with Clarion sold the fee interest in Pleasant Shops in Weymouth, Massachusetts for a sales price of $34.3 million.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated interim financial statements and notes thereto appearing in Item 1 of this report and the more detailed information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 11, 2014.
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When we refer to forward-looking statements or information, sometimes we use words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “plans,” “intends,” “expects,” “believes,” “estimates,” “anticipates” and “continues.” Forward-looking statements are not historical facts or guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are outside our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those we describe.
Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements that we make, including those in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except as may be required by law, we make no promise to update any of the forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should carefully review the risks and the risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and under Part II, Item 1A in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, before making any investments in us.
Overview
We are an equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in the ownership, management, and redevelopment of high quality retail and mixed-use properties located primarily in densely populated and affluent communities in strategically selected metropolitan markets in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States, and California. As of June 30, 2014, we owned or had a majority interest in community and neighborhood shopping centers and mixed-use properties which are operated as 89 predominantly retail real estate projects comprising approximately 20.0 million square feet (excludes unconsolidated joint venture properties). In total, the real estate projects were 95.3% leased and 94.3% occupied at June 30, 2014. A joint venture in which we own a 30% interest owned seven retail real estate projects totaling approximately 1.0 million square feet as of June 30, 2014. In total, the joint venture properties in which we own a 30% interest were 84.0% leased and 84.0% occupied at June 30, 2014.
2014 Significant Property Acquisition and 2014 Property Disposition
Effective January 1, 2014, we acquired a controlling interest in The Grove at Shrewsbury, a 187,000 square foot shopping center in Shrewsbury, New Jersey, and Brook 35, a 99,000 square foot shopping center in Sea Girt, New Jersey for a gross value of $161 million. Our effective economic interest approximates 84% and was funded by the assumption of our share of $68 million of mortgage debt, 632,000 downREIT operating partnership units, and $13 million of cash (which was in an escrow account at December 31, 2013). Approximately $1.7 million and $2.3 million of net assets acquired were allocated to other assets for "above market leases" and other liabilities for "below market leases," respectively. Additionally, $71.1 million was allocated to redeemable and nonredeemable noncontrolling interests. We incurred $2.0 million of acquisition costs, of which $0.9 million were incurred in 2014 and included in "general and administrative expense" for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
We have entered into an agreement to acquire the interest of one of the noncontrolling interest holders in The Grove at Shrewsbury in 2015. As this noncontrolling interest is mandatorily redeemable it has been classified as a liability of approximately $9 million and is included in "other liabilities and deferred credits" on the June 30, 2014 consolidated balance sheet. An additional noncontrolling interest holder has the right to require us to acquire its interests in The Grove at Shrewsbury and Brook 35 at the then current fair market value beginning on January 1, 2017.
On July 24, 2014, our Partnership with Clarion sold the fee interest in Pleasant Shops in Weymouth, Massachusetts for a sales price of $34.3 million.
2014 Significant Debt and Equity Transactions
In connection with the acquisition of The Grove at Shrewsbury and Brook 35 on January 1, 2014, we assumed mortgage debt secured by the individual properties with the following contractual terms:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Principal | | Stated Interest Rate | | Maturity Date |
| (In millions) | | | | |
Brook 35 | $ | 11.5 |
| | 5.46 | % | | July 1, 2014 |
The Grove at Shrewsbury (East) | 45.4 |
| | 5.82 | % | | October 1, 2017 |
The Grove at Shrewsbury (West) | 11.4 |
| | 6.38 | % | | March 1, 2018 |
On June 2, 2014 we refinanced the above mortgage loan on Brook 35 at a face amount of $11.5 million. The new mortgage loan bears interest at 4.65% and matures on July 1, 2029.
On June 3, 2014 we repaid the mortgage loan on Melville Mall prior to its original maturity date for $20.3 million. The loan had an original maturity date of September 1, 2014.
On February 12, 2014 we replaced our existing at the market (“ATM”) equity program with a new ATM equity program in which we may from time to time offer and sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. We intend to use the net proceeds to fund potential acquisition opportunities, fund our development and redevelopment pipeline, repay amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and/or for general corporate purposes. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, we issued 440,778 common shares at a weighted average price per share of $119.66 for net cash proceeds of $52.2 million and paid $0.5 million in commissions and less than $0.1 million in additional offering expenses related to the sales of these common shares. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we issued 896,490 common shares at a weighted average price per share of $115.44 for net cash proceeds of $102.3 million and paid $1.0 million in commissions and $0.1 million in additional operating expenses related to the sales of these common shares. As of June 30, 2014, we had the capacity to issue up to $196.5 million in common shares under our ATM equity program.
Capitalized Costs
Certain external and internal costs directly related to the development, redevelopment and leasing of real estate, including pre-construction costs, real estate taxes, insurance, construction costs and salaries and related costs of personnel directly involved, are capitalized. We capitalized external and internal costs related to both development and redevelopment activities of $147 million and $3 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and $121 million and $3 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2013. We capitalized external and internal costs related to other property improvements of $19 million and $1 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and $17 million and $1 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2013. We capitalized external and internal costs related to leasing activities of $8 million and $3 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and $5 million and $3 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The amount of capitalized internal costs for salaries and related benefits for development and redevelopment activities, other property improvements, and leasing activities were $3 million, $1 million, and $3 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and $3 million, $1 million, and $2 million, respectively for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” ASU 2014-08 amends the definition of a discontinued operation to include only the disposal of a component of an entity that represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major impact on an entity’s operations and financial results. The standard also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactions that do not meet the discontinued operations criteria. The standard is applicable prospectively for all disposals initially classified as held for sale in periods after adoption. We adopted the standard effective January 1, 2014, and there was no impact to the current period financial statements. In future periods, the adoption will result in most individual property disposals not qualifying for discontinued operations presentation and thus, the results of those disposals will remain in “income from continuing operations.” Properties sold prior to January 1, 2014, are not subject to ASU 2014-08 and therefore, continue to be classified as discontinued operations using the previous definition.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." ASU 2014-09 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP and replaces it with a core revenue recognition principle, that an entity will recognize revenue when it transfers control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services, and creates a five-step model for revenue recognition in accordance with this principle. ASU 2014-09 also requires new disclosures in both interim and annual reporting periods. The guidance in ASU 2014-09 does not apply to contracts within the scope of ASC 840, Leases.
ASU 2014-09 will be effective for us in the first quarter of 2017 and allows for either full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption. We are currently assessing the impact of this standard to our consolidated financial statements.
Outlook
We seek growth in earnings, funds from operations, and cash flows primarily through a combination of the following:
| |
• | growth in our same-center portfolio, |
| |
• | growth in our portfolio from property development and redevelopments, and |
| |
• | expansion of our portfolio through property acquisitions. |
Our same-center growth is primarily driven by increases in rental rates on new leases and lease renewals and changes in portfolio occupancy. Over the long-term, the infill nature and strong demographics of our properties provide a strategic advantage allowing us to maintain relatively high occupancy and increase rental rates. We have generally continued to see positive signs of improvement for many of our tenants as well as increased interest from prospective tenants for our retail spaces. While there can be no assurance that these positive signs will continue, we remain cautiously optimistic regarding the improved trends we have seen over the past few years. We believe the locations of our centers and diverse tenant base partially mitigates any negative change in the economic environment; however, any significant reduction in our tenants' abilities to pay base rent, percentage rent or other charges will adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We seek to maintain a mix of strong national, regional, and local retailers. At June 30, 2014, no single tenant accounted for more than 3.2% of annualized base rent.
Our properties are located in densely populated and/or affluent areas with high barriers to entry which allow us to take advantage of redevelopment opportunities that enhance our operating performance through renovation, expansion, reconfiguration, and/or retenanting. We evaluate our properties on an ongoing basis to identify these types of opportunities. In 2014, we expect to have redevelopment projects stabilizing with projected costs of approximately $87 million, including our 212 unit residential building at Santana Row discussed below. In 2015, we expect to have redevelopment projects stabilizing with projected costs of approximately $149 million.
We continue our ongoing redevelopment efforts at Santana Row. Our most recent 212 unit residential building was fully completed during second quarter. The building is expected to stabilize in 2014, was 93.9% leased as of June 30, 2014, and has a total cost of approximately $75 million. We are also proceeding with our next phase of redevelopment which is a six story building including approximately 225,500 square feet of office space, 1,500 square feet of retail space, and 670 parking spaces. After current phases, we have approximately 9 acres remaining for further redevelopment and entitlements in place for an additional 348 residential units and 69,000 square feet of commercial space. We are currently in the process of seeking additional entitlements and have under control an additional 12 acres of land adjacent to Santana Row.
We continue to invest in the development at Assembly Row which is a long-term development project we expect to be involved in over the coming years. The carrying value of the development portion of this project at June 30, 2014 is approximately $301 million. The project currently has zoning entitlements to build 3.4 million square feet of commercial-use buildings, 1,843 residential units, and a 170 room hotel. We have agreements with AvalonBay Communities ("AvalonBay") for a portion of the first phase of development at Assembly Row which includes 450 residential units (by AvalonBay) and approximately 326,000 square feet of retail space and 98,000 square feet of office space (both by the Trust). The Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority (MBTA) is constructing the new orange line T-Stop at the property, which is expected to open in 2014. Construction on the first phase and infrastructure is ongoing. Approximately 213,000 square feet of retail space in Phase I opened in second quarter 2014, with the remainder of the retail and office space expected over the next three to nine months. Phase I is expected to stabilize in 2015. Total expected costs for Phase I of Assembly Row range from $190 million to $200 million (net of reimbursements) of which $172 million has been incurred to date. In total, including costs incurred in the first six months of 2014, we expect to invest between $65 million and $85 million in Assembly Row in 2014, net of expected public funding.
In the third quarter 2012, we broke ground on the first phase of Pike & Rose in Rockville, MD, a long-term multi-phased mixed-use project located on a portion of our Mid-Pike Plaza property. The property currently has zoning entitlements to build 1.7 million square feet of commercial-use buildings and 1,583 residential units. Phase I of Pike & Rose involved demolition of roughly 25% of the existing gross leasable area at Mid-Pike Plaza (which was completed during the second quarter of 2012). The remainder of Mid-Pike Plaza was fully demolished in the third quarter of 2014. Construction on the 493 residential units, 151,000 square feet of retail space and 79,000 square feet of office space in Phase I is ongoing. In late June 2014, the first phase of our 174 unit residential building opened. We expect a portion of Phase I to open in 2014 and the remainder in 2015 and expect Phase I to stabilize in 2015/2016. Total expected costs for Phase I of Pike & Rose range from $245 million to $255 million of which $173 million has been incurred to date. Including costs incurred in the first six months of 2014, we expect to invest between $90 million and $120 million in 2014 related to Phase I.
The development of future phases of Assembly Row, Pike & Rose and Santana Row will be pursued opportunistically based on, among other things, market conditions, tenant demand, and our evaluation of whether those phases will generate an appropriate financial return.
We continue to review acquisition opportunities in our primary markets that complement our portfolio and provide long-term growth opportunities. Some of our acquisitions do not initially contribute significantly to earnings growth; however, we believe they provide long-term re-leasing growth, redevelopment opportunities, and other strategic opportunities. Any growth from acquisitions is contingent on our ability to find properties that meet our qualitative standards at prices that meet our financial hurdles. Changes in interest rates may affect our success in achieving earnings growth through acquisitions by affecting both the price that must be paid to acquire a property, as well as our ability to economically finance the property acquisition. Generally, our acquisitions are initially financed by available cash and/or borrowings under our revolving credit facility which may be repaid later with funds raised through the issuance of new equity or new long-term debt. On occasion we also finance our acquisitions through the issuance of common shares, preferred shares, or downREIT units as well as through new or assumed mortgages.
At June 30, 2014, the leasable square feet in our properties was 94.3% occupied and 95.3% leased. The leased rate is higher than the occupied rate due to leased spaces that are being redeveloped or improved or that are awaiting permits and, therefore, are not yet ready to be occupied. Our occupancy and leased rates are subject to variability over time due to factors including acquisitions, the timing of the start and stabilization of our redevelopment projects, lease expirations and tenant bankruptcies.
Lease Rollovers
For the second quarter of 2014, we signed leases for a total of 623,000 square feet of retail space including 537,000 square feet of comparable space leases (leases for which there was a prior tenant) at an average rental increase of 16% on a cash basis and 30% on a straight-line basis. New leases for comparable spaces were signed for 225,000 square feet at an average rental increase of 30% on a cash basis and 50% on a straight-line basis. Renewals for comparable spaces were signed for 312,000 square feet at an average rental increase of 8% on a cash basis and 20% on a straight-line basis. Tenant improvements and incentives for comparable spaces were $41.18 per square foot for new leases and $1.65 per square foot for renewals for the three months ended June 30, 2014.
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we signed leases for a total of 987,000 square feet of retail space including 865,000 square feet of comparable space leases (leases for which there was a prior tenant) at an average rental increase of 17% on a cash basis and 30% on a straight-line basis. New leases for comparable spaces were signed for 402,000 square feet at an average rental increase of 24% on a cash basis and 40% on a straight-line basis. Renewals for comparable spaces were signed for 464,000 square feet at an average rental increase of 12% on a cash basis and 24% on a straight-line basis. Tenant improvements and incentives for comparable spaces were $42.12 per square foot for new leases and $1.47 per square foot for renewals for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
The rental increases associated with comparable spaces generally include all leases signed in arms-length transactions reflecting market leverage between landlords and tenants during the period. The comparison between average rent for expiring leases and new leases is determined by including minimum rent and percentage rent paid on the expiring lease and minimum rent and in some instances, projections of first lease year percentage rent, to be paid on the new lease. In atypical circumstances, management may exercise judgment as to how to most effectively reflect the comparability of spaces reported in this calculation. The change in rental income on comparable space leases is impacted by numerous factors including current market rates, location, individual tenant creditworthiness, use of space, market conditions when the expiring lease was signed, capital investment made in the space and the specific lease structure. Tenant improvements and incentives include the total dollars committed for the improvement (fit-out) of a space as it relates to a specific lease and, except for redevelopments, may also include base building costs (i.e. expansion, escalators or new entrances) which are required to make the space leasable. Incentives include amounts paid to tenants as an inducement to sign a lease that do not represent building improvements.
The leases signed in 2014 generally become effective over the following two years though some may not become effective until 2017 and beyond. Further, there is risk that some new tenants will not ultimately take possession of their space and that tenants for both new and renewal leases may not pay all of their contractual rent due to operating, financing or other matters. However, these increases do provide information about the tenant/landlord relationship and the potential increase we may achieve in rental income over time.
Historically, we have executed comparable space leases for 1.2 to 1.5 million square feet of retail space each year. We believe our leasing volume for 2014 will be in line with our historical averages with overall positive increases in rental income. However, changes in rental income associated with individual signed leases on comparable spaces may be positive or negative, and we can provide no assurance that the rents on new leases will continue to increase at the above disclosed levels, if at all.
Same-Center
Throughout this section, we have provided certain information on a “same-center” basis. Information provided on a same-center basis includes the results of properties that we owned and operated for the entirety of both periods being compared except for properties for which significant redevelopment or expansion occurred during either of the periods being compared. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, all or a portion of 79 and 78 properties, respectively, were considered same-center and eleven and twelve properties, respectively, were considered redevelopment or expansion. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, two properties were moved from same-center to redevelopment, one property was moved from redevelopment to same-center, and one property was removed from redevelopment as it is vacant and prepared to be demolished, when compared to the designations as of December 31, 2013. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, one additional property was moved from redevelopment to same-center. While there is judgment surrounding changes in designations, we typically move redevelopment properties to same-center once they have stabilized, which is typically considered 95% occupancy or when the growth expected from the redevelopment has been included in the comparable periods. We typically remove properties from same center when the redevelopment has or is expected to have a significant impact to property operating income within the calendar year. Acquisitions are moved to same-center once we have owned the property for the entirety of comparable periods and the property is not under significant redevelopment or expansion.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | Dollars | | % |
| (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
Rental income | $ | 162,383 |
| | $ | 153,212 |
| | $ | 9,171 |
| | 6.0 | % |
Other property income | 4,325 |
| | 2,913 |
| | 1,412 |
| | 48.5 | % |
Mortgage interest income | 1,239 |
| | 1,263 |
| | (24 | ) | | (1.9 | )% |
Total property revenue | 167,947 |
| | 157,388 |
| | 10,559 |
| | 6.7 | % |
Rental expenses | 31,405 |
| | 28,209 |
| | 3,196 |
| | 11.3 | % |
Real estate taxes | 19,164 |
| | 17,632 |
| | 1,532 |
| | 8.7 | % |
Total property expenses | 50,569 |
| | 45,841 |
| | 4,728 |
| | 10.3 | % |
Property operating income | 117,378 |
| | 111,547 |
| | 5,831 |
| | 5.2 | % |
Other interest income | 18 |
| | 65 |
| | (47 | ) | | (72.3 | )% |
Income from real estate partnership | 250 |
| | 372 |
| | (122 | ) | | (32.8 | )% |
Interest expense | (23,213 | ) | | (27,147 | ) | | 3,934 |
| | (14.5 | )% |
Early extinguishment of debt | — |
| | (3,399 | ) | | 3,399 |
| | (100.0 | )% |
General and administrative expense | (8,124 | ) | | (8,302 | ) | | 178 |
| | (2.1 | )% |
Depreciation and amortization | (40,893 | ) | | (39,757 | ) | | (1,136 | ) | | 2.9 | % |
Total other, net | (71,962 | ) | | (78,168 | ) | | 6,206 |
| | (7.9 | )% |
Income from continuing operations | 45,416 |
| | 33,379 |
| | 12,037 |
| | 36.1 | % |
Discontinued operations - income | — |
| | 424 |
| | (424 | ) | | (100.0 | )% |
Gain on sale of real estate | — |
| | 4,994 |
| | (4,994 | ) | | (100.0 | )% |
Net income | 45,416 |
| | 38,797 |
| | 6,619 |
| | 17.1 | % |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (1,871 | ) | | (1,258 | ) | | (613 | ) | | 48.7 | % |
Net income attributable to the Trust | $ | 43,545 |
| | $ | 37,539 |
| | $ | 6,006 |
| | 16.0 | % |
Property Revenues
Total property revenue increased $10.6 million, or 6.7%, to $167.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $157.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. The percentage occupied at our shopping centers decreased to 94.3% at June 30, 2014 compared to 94.5% at June 30, 2013. Changes in the components of property revenue are discussed below.
Rental Income
Rental income consists primarily of minimum rent, cost reimbursements from tenants and percentage rent. Rental income increased $9.2 million, or 6.0%, to $162.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $153.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013 due primarily to the following:
| |
• | an increase of $4.6 million at same-center properties due primarily to a $2.5 million increase in recovery income and higher rental rates of approximately $2.2 million, |
| |
• | an increase of $3.9 million attributable to properties acquired in 2014 and 2013, and |
| |
• | an increase of $1.3 million at redevelopment properties due primarily to the lease-up of our new 212 unit residential building at Santana Row. |
partially offset by
| |
• | a decrease of $0.5 million from Mid-Pike Plaza as the property is prepared to be demolished for the future development of Pike & Rose. |
Other Property Income
Other property income increased $1.4 million, or 48.5%, to $4.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $2.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. Included in other property income are items which, although recurring, inherently tend to fluctuate more than rental income from period to period, such as lease termination fees. This increase is primarily due to an increase in lease termination fees at same-center properties.
Property Expenses
Total property expenses increased $4.7 million, or 10.3%, to $50.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $45.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. Changes in the components of property expenses are discussed below.
Rental Expenses
Rental expenses increased $3.2 million, or 11.3%, to $31.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $28.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. This increase is primarily due to the following:
| |
• | an increase of $0.8 million related to properties acquired in 2014 and 2013, |
| |
• | an increase of $0.6 million in repairs and maintenance at same-center and redevelopment properties, |
| |
• | an increase of $0.6 million related to Assembly Row and Pike & Rose, as portions of these projects began to open during the second quarter of 2014, |
| |
• | an increase of $0.4 million in bad debt expense at same-center properties, and |
| |
• | an increase of $0.3 million in payroll expense at same-center and redevelopment properties. |
As a result of the changes in rental income and rental expenses as discussed above, rental expenses as a percentage of rental income plus other property income increased to 18.8% in the three months ended June 30, 2014 from 18.1% in the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Real Estate Taxes
Real estate tax expense increased $1.5 million, or 8.7%, to $19.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $17.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013 due primarily to higher assessments and lower refunds at our same-center properties and real estate taxes on properties acquired in 2014 and 2013.
Property Operating Income
Property operating income increased $5.8 million, or 5.2%, to $117.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $111.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. This increase is primarily due to growth in earnings at same-center properties, properties acquired in 2014 and 2013, and earnings from our redevelopment properties, partially offset by a decline in earnings at Mid-Pike Plaza and the impact of Assembly Row and Pike & Rose as portions of the projects opened in the second quarter of 2014.
Other
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $3.9 million, or 14.5%, to $23.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $27.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. This decrease is due primarily to the following:
| |
• | a decrease of $2.9 million due to a lower overall weighted average borrowing rate, and |
| |
• | an increase of $1.7 million in capitalized interest due primarily to our ongoing development projects at Assembly Row and Pike & Rose, |
partially offset by
| |
• | an increase of $0.6 million due to higher borrowings. |
Gross interest costs were $28.7 million and $30.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Capitalized interest was $5.5 million and $3.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Early Extinguishment of Debt
The $3.4 million of early extinguishment of debt in the three months ended June 30, 2013 relates to the make-whole premium paid as part of the early redemption of our 5.40% senior notes and the related write-off of unamortized debt fees.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.1 million, or 2.9%, to $40.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 from $39.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. This increase is due primarily to 2014 acquisitions.
Discontinued Operations - Income
Income from discontinued operations represents the operating income of properties that were disposed prior to January 1, 2014, which were required to be reported separately from results of ongoing operations. The reported operating income of $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 primarily represents the operating income for the period during which we owned properties sold in 2013.
Gain on Sale of Real Estate
The $5.0 million gain on sale of real estate for the three months ended June 30, 2013 is primarily due to the sale of the fee interest in the land under an office building at our Village of Shirlington property in Arlington, Virginia, that was subject to a long term ground lease. The ground lease included an option for the tenant to purchase the fee interest.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | Dollars | | % |
| (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
Rental income | $ | 328,576 |
| | $ | 305,828 |
| | $ | 22,748 |
| | 7.4 | % |
Other property income | 7,725 |
| | 6,181 |
| | 1,544 |
| | 25.0 | % |
Mortgage interest income | 2,474 |
| | 2,528 |
| | (54 | ) | | (2.1 | )% |
Total property revenue | 338,775 |
| | 314,537 |
| | 24,238 |
| | 7.7 | % |
Rental expenses | 68,535 |
| | 57,710 |
| | 10,825 |
| | 18.8 | % |
Real estate taxes | 37,864 |
| | 35,204 |
| | 2,660 |
| | 7.6 | % |
Total property expenses | 106,399 |
| | 92,914 |
| | 13,485 |
| | 14.5 | % |
Property operating income | 232,376 |
| | 221,623 |
| | 10,753 |
| | 4.9 | % |
Other interest income | 43 |
| | 95 |
| | (52 | ) | | (54.7 | )% |
Income from real estate partnerships | 463 |
| | 684 |
| | (221 | ) | | (32.3 | )% |
Interest expense | (46,350 | ) | | (54,552 | ) | | 8,202 |
| | (15.0 | )% |
Early extinguishment of debt | — |
| | (3,399 | ) | | 3,399 |
| | (100.0 | )% |
General and administrative expense | (15,828 | ) | | (15,359 | ) | | (469 | ) | | 3.1 | % |
Depreciation and amortization | (84,743 | ) | | (80,274 | ) | | (4,469 | ) | | 5.6 | % |
Total other, net | (146,415 | ) | | (152,805 | ) | | 6,390 |
| | (4.2 | )% |
Income from continuing operations | 85,961 |
| | 68,818 |
| | 17,143 |
| | 24.9 | % |
Discontinued operations - income | — |
| | 827 |
| | (827 | ) | | (100.0 | )% |
Gain on sale of real estate | — |
| | 4,994 |
| | (4,994 | ) | | (100.0 | )% |
Net income | 85,961 |
| | 74,639 |
| | 11,322 |
| | 15.2 | % |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (3,663 | ) | | (2,512 | ) | | (1,151 | ) | | 45.8 | % |
Net income attributable to the Trust | $ | 82,298 |
| | $ | 72,127 |
| | $ | 10,171 |
| | 14.1 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Property Revenues
Total property revenue increased $24.2 million, or 7.7%, to $338.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $314.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. The percentage occupied at our shopping centers decreased to 94.3% at June 30, 2014 compared to 94.5% at June 30, 2013. Changes in the components of property revenue are discussed below.
Rental Income
Rental income consists primarily of minimum rent, cost reimbursements from tenants and percentage rent. Rental income increased $22.7 million, or 7.4%, to $328.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $305.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013 due primarily to the following:
| |
• | an increase of $12.3 million at same-center properties due primarily to a $7.6 million increase in recovery income (largely the result of reimbursements for higher snow removal costs) and higher rental rates of approximately $4.8 million, |
| |
• | an increase of $8.5 million attributable to properties acquired in 2014 and 2013, and |
| |
• | an increase of $3.2 million at redevelopment properties due primarily to the lease-up of our new 212 unit residential building at Santana Row and the net impact of other redevelopment properties, |
partially offset by
| |
• | a decrease of $1.1 million from Mid-Pike Plaza as the property is prepared to be demolished for the future development of Pike & Rose. |
Other Property Income
Other property income increased $1.5 million, or 25.0%, to $7.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $6.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. Included in other property income are items which, although recurring, inherently tend to fluctuate more than rental income from period to period, such as lease termination fees. This increase is primarily due to an increase in lease termination fees at same-center properties.
Property Expenses
Total property expenses increased $13.5 million, or 14.5%, to $106.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $92.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. Changes in the components of property expenses are discussed below.
Rental Expenses
Rental expenses increased $10.8 million, or 18.8%, to $68.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $57.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase is primarily due to the following:
| |
• | an increase of $5.7 million in repairs and maintenance at same-center and redevelopment properties due primarily to higher snow removal costs, |
| |
• | an increase of $1.6 million related to properties acquired in 2014 and 2013, |
| |
• | an increase of $0.9 million related to Assembly Row and Pike & Rose, as portions of these projects began to open during the six months ended June 30, 2014, |
| |
• | an increase of $0.9 million in utilities at our same-center and redevelopment properties primarily due to higher electric costs and usage as a result of the harsh winter, |
| |
• | an increase of $0.7 million in payroll expense at same-center and redevelopment properties, and |
| |
• | an increase of $0.7 million in bad debt expense at same-center properties. |
As a result of the changes in rental income and rental expenses as discussed above, rental expenses as a percentage of rental income plus other property income increased to 20.4% in the six months ended June 30, 2014 from 18.5% in the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Real Estate Taxes
Real estate tax expense increased $2.7 million, or 7.6%, to $37.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $35.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013 due primarily to higher assessments and lower refunds at our same-center properties and real estate taxes on properties acquired in 2014 and 2013.
Property Operating Income
Property operating income increased $10.8 million, or 4.9%, to $232.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $221.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase is primarily due to growth in earnings at our same-center properties, properties acquired in 2014 and 2013, and earnings from our redevelopment properties, partially offset by a decline in earnings at Mid-Pike Plaza.
Other
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $8.2 million, or 15.0%, to $46.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $54.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. This decrease is due primarily to the following:
| |
• | a decrease of $6.9 million due to a lower overall weighted average borrowing rate, and |
| |
• | an increase of $4.4 million in capitalized interest due primarily to our ongoing development projects at Assembly Row and Pike & Rose, |
partially offset by
| |
• | an increase of $3.0 million due to higher borrowings. |
Gross interest costs were $57.4 million and $61.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Capitalized interest was $11.0 million and $6.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Early Extinguishment of Debt
The $3.4 million of early extinguishment of debt in the six months ended June 30, 2013 relates to the make-whole premium paid as part of the early redemption of our 5.40% senior notes and the related write-off of unamortized debt fees.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.5 million, or 5.6%, to $84.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 from $80.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase is due primarily to 2014 and 2013 acquisitions.
Discontinued Operations - Income
Income from discontinued operations represents the operating income of properties that were disposed prior to January 1, 2014, which were required to be reported separately from results of ongoing operations. The reported operating income of $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 primarily represents the operating income for the period during which we owned properties sold in 2013.
Gain on Sale of Real Estate
The $5.0 million gain on sale of real estate for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is primarily due to the sale of the fee interest in the land under an office building at our Village of Shirlington property in Arlington, Virginia, that was subject to a long term ground lease. The ground lease included an option for the tenant to purchase the fee interest.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Due to the nature of our business and strategy, we typically generate significant amounts of cash from operations. The cash generated from operations is primarily paid to our common and preferred shareholders in the form of dividends. As a REIT, we must generally make annual distributions to shareholders of at least 90% of our taxable income.
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of normal recurring operating expenses, obligations under our capital and operating leases, regular debt service requirements (including debt service relating to additional or replacement debt, as well as scheduled debt maturities), recurring expenditures, non-recurring expenditures (such as tenant improvements and redevelopments) and dividends to common and preferred shareholders. Our long-term capital requirements consist primarily of maturities under our long-term debt agreements, development and redevelopment costs and potential acquisitions.
We intend to operate with and maintain a conservative capital structure that will allow us to maintain strong debt service coverage and fixed-charge coverage ratios as part of our commitment to investment-grade debt ratings. In the short and long term, we may seek to obtain funds through the issuance of additional equity, unsecured and/or secured debt financings, joint venture relationships relating to existing properties or new acquisitions, and property dispositions that are consistent with this conservative structure.
Cash and cash equivalents were $41.3 million at June 30, 2014. Additionally, we have a $600.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility which matures on April 21, 2017, subject to a one-year extension at our option, and had no borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2014. In addition, we have an option (subject to bank approval) to increase the credit facility through an accordion feature to $1.0 billion. Our $275.0 million unsecured term loan, which matures on November 21, 2018, also has an
option (subject to bank approval) to increase the term loan through an accordion feature to $350.0 million. As of June 30, 2014, we had the capacity to issue up to $196.5 million in common shares under our ATM equity program.
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the maximum amount of borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility was $19.0 million, the weighted average amount of borrowings outstanding was $2.1 million and the weighted average interest rate, before amortization of debt fees, was 1.05%. For the remainder of 2014, we have no additional debt maturing. We currently believe that cash flows from operations, cash on hand, our ATM equity program, our revolving credit facility and our general ability to access the capital markets will be sufficient to finance our operations and fund our debt service requirements (including maturities) and capital expenditures.
Our overall capital requirements for the remainder of 2014 will depend upon acquisition opportunities, the level of improvements and redevelopments on existing properties and the timing and cost of development of Assembly Row, Pike & Rose and future phases of Santana Row. While the amount of future expenditures will depend on numerous factors, we expect to continue to see higher levels of capital investments in our properties under development and redevelopment in 2014 which is the result of the continued construction of Phase I at both Assembly Row and Pike & Rose with openings of portions of both projects in 2014. Over the next eighteen months, we expect to invest approximately $125 million related to the current phases of these two projects. With respect to other capital investments related to our existing properties, we expect to incur levels consistent with prior years. Our capital investments will be funded on a short-term basis with cash flow from operations, cash on hand and/or our revolving credit facility, and on a long-term basis with long-term debt or equity including shares issued under our ATM equity program. If necessary, we may access the debt or equity capital markets to finance significant acquisitions. Given our past ability to access the capital markets, we expect debt or equity to be available to us. Although there is no intent at this time, if market conditions deteriorate, we may also delay the timing of certain development and redevelopment projects as well as limit future acquisitions, reduce our operating expenditures, or re-evaluate our dividend policy.
In addition to conditions in the capital markets which could affect our ability to access those markets, the following factors could affect our ability to meet our liquidity requirements:
| |
• | restrictions in our debt instruments or preferred shares may limit us from incurring debt or issuing equity at all, or on acceptable terms under then-prevailing market conditions; and |
| |
• | we may be unable to service additional or replacement debt due to increases in interest rates or a decline in our operating performance. |
Summary of Cash Flows
|
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands) |
Cash provided by operating activities | $ | 172,069 |
| | $ | 146,696 |
|
Cash used in investing activities | (190,122 | ) | | (158,178 | ) |
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (29,562 | ) | | 82,860 |
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (47,615 | ) | | 71,378 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 88,927 |
| | 36,988 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 41,312 |
| | $ | 108,366 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $25.4 million to $172.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 from $146.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to higher net income before certain non-cash items.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $31.9 million to $190.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 from $158.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to:
| |
• | $63.2 million increase in capital investments and leasing costs in 2014 primarily related to our development projects at Assembly Row and Pike & Rose, |
| |
• | $8.6 million in proceeds from the sale of real estate in 2013, and |
| |
• | $3.6 million contribution to our real estate partnership to repay the mortgage loan of one of its properties prior to the original maturity date, |
partially offset by
| |
• | $42.9 million decrease in acquisitions of real estate due to the April 2013 Darien acquisition. |
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $112.4 million to $29.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 from $82.9 million provided during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease was primarily attributable to:
| |
• | $269.3 million in net proceeds from the issuance of 2.75% senior notes in May 2013, and |
| |
• | $9.7 million increase in dividends paid to shareholders due to an increase in the dividend rate and increased number of shares outstanding, |
partially offset by
| |
• | $135.0 million redemption of our 5.40% senior notes in June 2013, |
| |
• | $20.7 million increase in net proceeds from the issuance of common shares due primarily to the sale of 0.9 million shares under our ATM equity program at a weighted average price of $115.44 in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to 0.7 million shares at a weighted average price of $113.08 in the six months ended June 30, 2013, and |
| |
• | $8.4 million decrease in repayment of mortgages, capital leases, and notes payable due to the payoff of one mortgage for $20.3 million in 2014, compared to two mortgages totaling $28.2 million in 2013. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have a joint venture arrangement (the “Partnership”) with affiliates of a discretionary fund created and advised by ING Clarion Partners (“Clarion”). We own 30% of the equity in the Partnership and Clarion owns 70%. We hold a general partnership interest, however, Clarion also holds a general partnership interest and has substantive participating rights. We cannot make significant decisions without Clarion’s approval. Accordingly, we account for our interest in the Partnership using the equity method. As of June 30, 2014, the Partnership owned seven retail real estate properties. We are the manager of the Partnership and its properties, earning fees for acquisitions, management, leasing and financing. We also have the opportunity to receive performance-based earnings through our Partnership interest. The Partnership is subject to a buy-sell provision which is customary in real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. Either partner may initiate this provision at any time, which could result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire Clarion’s interest. Accounting policies for the Partnership are similar to accounting policies followed by the Trust. At June 30, 2014, our investment in the Partnership was $35.5 million and the Partnership had approximately $44.9 million of mortgages payable outstanding.
On July 24, 2014, our Partnership with Clarion sold the fee interest in Pleasant Shops in Weymouth, Massachusetts for a sales price of $34.3 million.
Debt Financing Arrangements
The following is a summary of our total debt outstanding as of June 30, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Description of Debt | Original Debt Issued | | Principal Balance as of June 30, 2014 | | Stated Interest Rate as of June 30, 2014 | | Maturity Date |
| (Dollars in thousands) | | | | |
Mortgages payable (1) | | | | | | | |
Secured fixed rate | | | | | | | |
THE AVENUE at White Marsh | Acquired |
| | $ | 53,418 |
| | 5.46 | % | | January 1, 2015 |
Barracks Road | 44,300 |
| | 36,538 |
| | 7.95 | % | | November 1, 2015 |
Hauppauge | 16,700 |
| | 13,774 |
| | 7.95 | % | | November 1, 2015 |
Lawrence Park | 31,400 |
| | 25,898 |
| | 7.95 | % | | November 1, 2015 |
Wildwood | 27,600 |
| | 22,764 |
| | 7.95 | % | | November 1, 2015 |
Wynnewood | 32,000 |
| | 26,393 |
| | 7.95 | % | | November 1, 2015 |
Brick Plaza | 33,000 |
| | 26,842 |
| | 7.42 | % | | November 1, 2015 |
East Bay Bridge | Acquired |
| | 61,474 |
| | 5.13 | % | | March 1, 2016 |
Plaza El Segundo | Acquired |
| | 175,000 |
| | 6.33 | % | | August 5, 2017 |
The Grove at Shrewsbury (East) | Acquired |
| | 44,980 |
| | 5.82 | % | | October 1, 2017 |
The Grove at Shrewsbury (West) | Acquired |
| | 11,346 |
| | 6.38 | % | | March 1, 2018 |
Rollingwood Apartments | 24,050 |
| | 22,326 |
| | 5.54 | % | | May 1, 2019 |
29th Place | Acquired |
| | 5,031 |
| | 5.91 | % | | January 31, 2021 |
Montrose Crossing | 80,000 |
| | 76,612 |
| | 4.20 | % | | January 10, 2022 |
Brook 35 | 11,500 |
| | 11,500 |
| | 4.65 | % | | July 1, 2029 |
Chelsea | Acquired |
| | 7,172 |
| | 5.36 | % | | January 15, 2031 |
Subtotal | | | 621,068 |
| | | | |
Net unamortized premium | | | 12,977 |
| | | | |
Total mortgages payable | | | 634,045 |
| | | | |
Notes payable | | | | | | | |
Unsecured fixed rate | | | | | | | |
Term loan (2) | 275,000 |
| | 275,000 |
| | LIBOR + 1.30% |
| | November 21, 2018 |
Various | 7,239 |
| | 6,365 |
| | 11.31% |
| | Various through 2028 |
Unsecured variable rate | | | | | | | |
Escondido (municipal bonds) (3) | 9,400 |
| | 9,400 |
| | 0.09% |
| | October 1, 2016 |
Revolving credit facility (4) | 600,000 |
| | — |
| | LIBOR + 0.90% |
| | April 21, 2017 |
Total notes payable | | | 290,765 |
| | | | |
Senior notes and debentures | | | | | | | |
Unsecured fixed rate | | | | | | | |
5.65% notes | 125,000 |
| | 125,000 |
| | 5.65 | % | | June 1, 2016 |
6.20% notes | 200,000 |
| | 200,000 |
| | 6.20 | % | | January 15, 2017 |
5.90% notes | 150,000 |
| | 150,000 |
| | 5.90 | % | | April 1, 2020 |
3.00% notes | 250,000 |
| | 250,000 |
| | 3.00 | % | | August 1, 2022 |
2.75% notes | 275,000 |
| | 275,000 |
| | 2.75 | % | | June 1, 2023 |
3.95% notes | 300,000 |
| | 300,000 |
| | 3.95 | % | | January 15, 2024 |
7.48% debentures | 50,000 |
| | 29,200 |
| | 7.48 | % | | August 15, 2026 |
6.82% medium term notes | 40,000 |
| | 40,000 |
| | 6.82 | % | | August 1, 2027 |
Subtotal | | | 1,369,200 |
| | | | |
Net unamortized discount | | | (7,918 | ) | | | | |
Total senior notes and debentures | | | 1,361,282 |
| | | | |
Capital lease obligations | | | | | | | |
Various | | | 71,659 |
| | Various |
| | Various through 2106 |
Total debt and capital lease obligations | | | $ | 2,357,751 |
| | | | |
_____________________ | |
1) | Mortgages payable do not include our 30% share ($13.5 million) of the $44.9 million debt of the partnership with a discretionary fund created and advised by Clarion. |
| |
2) | We entered into two interest rate swap agreements that fix the LIBOR portion of the interest rate on the term loan at 1.72%. The spread on the term loan is 130 basis points resulting in a fixed rate of 3.02%. |
| |
3) | The bonds require monthly interest only payments through maturity. The bonds bear interest at a variable rate determined weekly, which would enable the bonds to be remarketed at 100% of their principal amount. The Escondido Promenade property is not encumbered by a lien. |
| |
4) | The maximum amount drawn under our revolving credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $19.0 million, and the weighted average interest rate on borrowings under our revolving credit facility, before amortization of debt fees, was 1.05%. |
Our revolving credit facility, term loan and other debt agreements include financial and other covenants that may limit our operating activities in the future. As of June 30, 2014, we were in compliance with all of the financial and other covenants. If we were to breach any of our debt covenants and did not cure the breach within an applicable cure period, our lenders could require us to repay the debt immediately and, if the debt is secured, could immediately begin proceedings to take possession of the property securing the loan. Many of our debt arrangements, including our public notes, term loan and our revolving credit facility, are cross-defaulted, which means that the lenders under those debt arrangements can put us in default and require immediate repayment of their debt if we breach and fail to cure a default under certain of our other debt obligations. As a result, any default under our debt covenants could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, our results of operations, our ability to meet our obligations and the market value of our shares. Our organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that we may incur.
The following is a summary of our scheduled principal repayments as of June 30, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Unsecured | | Secured | | Capital Lease | | Total | |
| (In thousands) | |
2014 | $ | 282 |
| | $ | 5,224 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 5,522 |
| |
2015 | 373 |
| | 207,188 |
| | 27 |
| | 207,588 |
| |
2016 | 134,811 |
| | 63,665 |
| | 30 |
| | 198,506 |
| |
2017 | 200,456 |
| (1) | 220,438 |
| | 34 |
| | 420,928 |
| |
2018 | 275,505 |
| | 13,326 |
| | 37 |
| | 288,868 |
| |
Thereafter | 1,048,538 |
| | 111,227 |
| | 71,515 |
| | 1,231,280 |
| |
| $ | 1,659,965 |
| | $ | 621,068 |
| | $ | 71,659 |
| | $ | 2,352,692 |
| (2 | ) |
_____________________
| |
1) | Our $600.0 million revolving credit facility matures on April 21, 2017, subject to a one-year extension at our option. As of June 30, 2014, there was no balance outstanding under this credit facility. |
| |
2) | The total debt maturities differs from the total reported on the consolidated balance sheet due to the unamortized net premium or discount on certain mortgage loans, senior notes and debentures as of June 30, 2014. |
Interest Rate Hedging
We may use derivative instruments to manage exposure to variable interest rate risk. We generally enter into interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to variable interest rate risk and treasury locks to manage the risk of interest rates rising prior to the issuance of debt. We enter into derivative instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges and do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
The interest rate swaps associated with our cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. We assess effectiveness of our cash flow hedges both at inception and on an ongoing basis. The effective portion of changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps associated with our cash flow hedges is recorded in other comprehensive income/loss which is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our consolidated balance sheet and our consolidated statement of of shareholders' equity. Our cash flow hedges become ineffective if critical terms of the hedging instrument and the debt instrument do not perfectly match such as notional amounts, settlement dates, reset dates, calculation period and LIBOR rate. In addition, we evaluate the default risk of the counterparty by monitoring the credit-worthiness of the counterparty which includes reviewing debt ratings and financial performance. However, management does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparty. If a cash flow hedge is deemed ineffective, the ineffective portion of changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps associated with our cash flow hedges is recognized in earnings in the period affected.
As of June 30, 2014, we are party to two interest rate swap agreements that effectively fixed the rate on the term loan at 3.02%. Both swaps were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges and were recorded at fair value. Hedge ineffectiveness has not impacted earnings as of June 30, 2014, and we do not anticipate it will have a significant effect in the future.
REIT Qualification
We intend to maintain our qualification as a REIT under Section 856(c) of the Code. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to corporate federal income taxes on income we distribute to our shareholders as long as we satisfy certain technical requirements of the Code, including the requirement to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our shareholders.
Funds From Operations
Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure of real estate companies’ operating performance. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines FFO as follows: net income, computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and excluding extraordinary items, gains and losses on the sale of real estate, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate. We compute FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, and we have historically reported our FFO available for common shareholders in addition to our net income and net cash provided by operating activities. It should be noted that FFO:
| |
• | does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP (which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income); |
| |
• | should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance; and |
| |
• | is not necessarily indicative of cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to fund cash needs, including the payment of dividends. |
We consider FFO available for common shareholders a meaningful, additional measure of operating performance primarily because it excludes the assumption that the value of the real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, as implied by the historical cost convention of GAAP and the recording of depreciation. We use FFO primarily as one of several means of assessing our operating performance in comparison with other REITs. Comparison of our presentation of FFO to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.
An increase or decrease in FFO available for common shareholders does not necessarily result in an increase or decrease in aggregate distributions because our Board of Trustees is not required to increase distributions on a quarterly basis unless necessary for us to maintain REIT status. However, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to remain qualified as a REIT. Therefore, a significant increase in FFO will generally require an increase in distributions to shareholders although not necessarily on a proportionate basis.
In addition to FFO, we have also included FFO excluding the 2013 "early extinguishment of debt" charge which relates to the early redemption of our 5.40% senior notes. We believe the unusual nature of this charge, being a make-whole payment on the remaining principal and interest on the redeemed notes, is worthy of separate evaluation and consequently have provided both relevant metrics.
The reconciliation of net income to FFO available for common shareholders and FFO available for common shareholders excluding early extinguishment of debt is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| (In thousands, except per share data) |
Net income | $ | 45,416 |
| | $ | 38,797 |
| | $ | 85,961 |
| | $ | 74,639 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (1,871 | ) | | (1,258 | ) | | (3,663 | ) | | (2,512 | ) |
Gain on sale of real estate | — |
| | (4,994 | ) | | — |
| | (4,994 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets | 36,499 |
| | 35,834 |
| | 76,048 |
| | 72,396 |
|
Amortization of initial direct costs of leases | 2,947 |
| | 2,639 |
| | 5,778 |
| | 5,407 |
|
Depreciation of joint venture real estate assets | 441 |
| | 370 |
| | 850 |
| | 746 |
|
Funds from operations | 83,432 |
| | 71,388 |
| | 164,974 |
| | 145,682 |
|
Dividends on preferred shares | (135 | ) | | (135 | ) | | (271 | ) | | (271 | ) |
Income attributable to operating partnership units | 715 |
| | 215 |
| | 1,431 |
| | 442 |
|
Income attributable to unvested shares | (377 | ) | | (320 | ) | | (752 | ) | | (656 | ) |
Funds from operations available for common shareholders | 83,635 |
| | 71,148 |
| | 165,382 |
| | 145,197 |
|
Early extinguishment of debt, net of allocation to unvested shares | — |
| | 3,383 |
| | — |
| | 3,383 |
|
Funds from operations available for common shareholders excluding early extinguishment of debt | $ | 83,635 |
| | $ | 74,531 |
| | $ | 165,382 |
| | $ | 148,580 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares, diluted (1) | 68,194 |
| | 65,605 |
| | 67,939 |
| | 65,383 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Funds from operations available for common shareholders, per diluted share | $ | 1.23 |
| | $ | 1.08 |
| | $ | 2.43 |
| | $ | 2.22 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Funds from operations available for common shareholders excluding early extinguishment of debt, per diluted share | $ | 1.23 |
| | $ | 1.14 |
| | $ | 2.43 |
| | $ | 2.27 |
|
_____________________
| |
(1) | The weighted average common shares used to compute FFO per diluted common share includes operating partnership units that were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS. Conversion of these operating partnership units is dilutive in the computation of FFO per diluted common share but is anti-dilutive for the computation of diluted EPS for the periods presented. |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our use of financial instruments, such as debt instruments, subjects us to market risk which may affect our future earnings and cash flows, as well as the fair value of our assets. Market risk generally refers to the risk of loss from changes in interest rates and market prices. We manage our market risk by attempting to match anticipated inflow of cash from our operating, investing and financing activities with anticipated outflow of cash to fund debt payments, dividends to common and preferred shareholders, investments, capital expenditures and other cash requirements.
We may enter into certain types of derivative financial instruments to further reduce interest rate risk. We use interest rate protection and swap agreements, for example, to convert some of our variable rate debt to a fixed-rate basis or to hedge anticipated financing transactions. We use derivatives for hedging purposes rather than speculation and do not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes. As of June 30, 2014, we were party to two interest rate swap agreements that effectively fixed the rate on the term loan at 3.02%.
Interest Rate Risk
The following discusses the effect of hypothetical changes in market rates of interest on interest expense for our variable rate debt and on the fair value of our total outstanding debt, including our fixed-rate debt. Interest rate risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our debt. Quoted market prices were used to estimate the fair value of our marketable senior notes and debentures and discounted cash flow analysis is generally used to estimate the fair value of our mortgages and notes payable. Considerable judgment is necessary to estimate the fair value of financial
instruments. This analysis does not purport to take into account all of the factors that may affect our debt, such as the effect that a changing interest rate environment could have on the overall level of economic activity or the action that our management might take to reduce our exposure to the change. This analysis assumes no change in our financial structure.
Fixed Interest Rate Debt
The majority of our outstanding debt obligations (maturing at various times through 2031 or, with respect to capital lease obligations, through 2106) have fixed interest rates which limit the risk of fluctuating interest rates. However, interest rate fluctuations may affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt instruments. At June 30, 2014, we had $2.3 billion of fixed-rate debt outstanding, including our $275.0 million term loan as the rate is effectively fixed by two interest rate swap agreements; we also had $71.7 million of capital lease obligations. If market interest rates used to calculate the fair value on our fixed-rate debt instruments at June 30, 2014 had been 1.0% higher, the fair value of those debt instruments on that date would have decreased by approximately $100.7 million. If market interest rates used to calculate the fair value on our fixed-rate debt instruments at June 30, 2014 had been 1.0% lower, the fair value of those debt instruments on that date would have increased by approximately $107.1 million.
Variable Interest Rate Debt
Generally, we believe that our primary interest rate risk is due to fluctuations in interest rates on our variable rate debt. At June 30, 2014, we had $9.4 million of variable rate debt outstanding which consisted of municipal bonds. Our revolving credit facility had no outstanding balance as of June 30, 2014. Based upon this amount of variable rate debt and the specific terms, if market interest rates increased 1.0%, our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $0.1 million, and our net income and cash flows for the year would decrease by approximately $0.1 million. Conversely, if market interest rates decreased 1.0%, our annual interest expense would decrease by less than $0.1 million with a corresponding increase in our net income and cash flows for the year.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Periodic Evaluation and Conclusion of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation has been performed, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2014. Based on this evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2014 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during quarterly period covered by this report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on February 11, 2014. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
| |
• | risks that our tenants will not pay rent, may vacate early or may file for bankruptcy or that we may be unable to renew leases or re-let space at favorable rents as leases expire; |
| |
• | risks that we may not be able to proceed with or obtain necessary approvals for any redevelopment or renovation project, and that completion of anticipated or ongoing property redevelopment or renovation projects that we do pursue may cost more, take more time to complete or fail to perform as expected; |
| |
• | risk that we are investing a significant amount in ground-up development projects that may be dependent on third parties to deliver critical aspects of certain projects, requires spending a substantial amount upfront in infrastructure, and assumes receipt of public funding which has been committed but not entirely funded; |
| |
• | risks normally associated with the real estate industry, including risks that: |
| |
• | occupancy levels at our properties and the amount of rent that we receive from our properties may be lower than expected, |
| |
• | new acquisitions may fail to perform as expected, |
| |
• | competition for acquisitions could result in increased prices for acquisitions, |
| |
• | environmental issues may develop at our properties and result in unanticipated costs, and |
| |
• | because real estate is illiquid, we may not be able to sell properties when appropriate; |
| |
• | risks that our growth will be limited if we cannot obtain additional capital; |
| |
• | risks associated with general economic conditions, including local economic conditions in our geographic markets; |
| |
• | risks of financing, such as our ability to consummate additional financings or obtain replacement financing on terms which are acceptable to us, our ability to meet existing financial covenants and the limitations imposed on our operations by those covenants, and the possibility of increases in interest rates that would result in increased interest expense; and |
| |
• | risks related to our status as a real estate investment trust, commonly referred to as a REIT, for federal income tax purposes, such as the existence of complex tax regulations relating to our status as a REIT, the effect of future changes in REIT requirements as a result of new legislation, and the adverse consequences of the failure to qualify as a REIT. |
| |
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
Under the terms of various operating partnership agreements of certain of our affiliated limited partnerships, the interest of limited partners in those limited partnerships may be redeemed, subject to certain conditions, for cash or an equivalent number of our common shares, at our option. During the three months ended June 30, 2014 we redeemed 500 downREIT operating partnership units for cash.
| |
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
None.
A list of exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is set forth on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto authorized.
|
| | |
| | FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST |
| |
August 7, 2014 | | /s/ Donald C. Wood |
| | Donald C. Wood, |
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee |
| | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| |
August 7, 2014 | | /s/ James M. Taylor, Jr. |
| | James M. Taylor, Jr., |
| | Executive Vice President - |
| | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
| | |
EXHIBIT INDEX |
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | |
3.1 | | Declaration of Trust of Federal Realty Investment Trust dated May 5, 1999 as amended by the Articles of Amendment of Declaration of Trust of Federal Realty Investment Trust dated May 6, 2004, as corrected by the Certificate of Correction of Articles of Amendment of Declaration of Trust of Federal Realty Investment Trust dated June 17, 2004, as amended by the Articles of Amendment of Declaration of Trust of Federal Realty Investment Trust dated May 6, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Trust’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-160009) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
3.2 | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Federal Realty Investment Trust dated February 12, 2003, as amended October 29, 2003, May 5, 2004, February 17, 2006 and May 6, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Trust’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-160009) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.1 | | Specimen Common Share certificate (previously filed as Exhibit 4(i) to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.2 | | Articles Supplementary relating to the 5.417% Series 1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2007, (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.3 | | Indenture dated December 1, 1993 related to the Trust’s 7.48% Debentures due August 15, 2026; and 6.82% Medium Term Notes due August 1, 2027; (previously filed as Exhibit 4(a) to the Trust’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-51029), and amended on Form S-3 (File No. 33-63687), filed on December 13, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
4.4 | | Indenture dated September 1, 1998 related to the Trust’s 5.65% Notes due 2016; 6.00% Notes due 2012; 6.20% Notes due 2017; 5.40% Notes due 2013; 5.95% Notes due 2014 and the 5.90% Notes due 2020; 3.00% Notes due 2022; 2.75% Notes due 2023; 3.95% Notes due 2024 (previously filed as Exhibit 4(a) to the Trust’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-63619) filed on September 17, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.1 | | Severance Agreement between the Trust and Donald C. Wood dated February 22, 1999 (previously filed as a portion of Exhibit 10 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 (File No. 1-07533) (the “1999 1Q Form 10-Q”) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.2 | | Executive Agreement between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Donald C. Wood dated February 22, 1999 (previously filed as a portion of Exhibit 10 to the 1999 1Q Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.3 | | Amendment to Executive Agreement between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Donald C. Wood dated February 16, 2005 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 1-07533) (the “2004 Form 10-K”) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.4 | | 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Trust’s S-8 Registration Number 333-60364 filed on May 7, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.5 | | Health Coverage Continuation Agreement between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Donald C. Wood dated February 16, 2005 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.6 | | Severance Agreement between the Trust and Dawn M. Becker dated April 19, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Trust’s 2005 2Q Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.7 | | Amendment to Severance Agreement between the Trust and Dawn M. Becker dated February 16, 2005 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.8 | | Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s 2003 Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.9 | | Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust's Annual Incentive Bonus Program for shares issued out of the 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously files as Exhibit 10.29 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.10 | | Form of Option Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s 2003 Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the 2005 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
|
| | |
EXHIBIT INDEX |
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
10.11 | | Amended and Restated 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.12 | | Amendment to Severance Agreement between the Trust and Donald C. Wood dated January 1, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-07533) (“the 2008 Form 10-K”) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.13 | | Second Amendment to Executive Agreement between the Trust and Donald C. Wood dated January 1, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.14 | | Amendment to Health Coverage Continuation Agreement between the Trust and Donald C. Wood dated January 1, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.15 | | Second Amendment to Severance Agreement between the Trust and Dawn M. Becker dated January 1, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.16 | | 2010 Performance Incentive Plan (previously filed as Appendix A to the Trust’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (File No. 01-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.17 | | Amendment to 2010 Performance Incentive Plan (“the 2010 Plan”) (previously filed as Appendix A to the Trust’s Proxy Supplement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (File No. 01-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.18 | | Restricted Share Award Agreement between the Trust and Donald C. Wood dated October 12, 2010 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 01-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.19 | | Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program and the Trust’s Annual Incentive Bonus Program and basic awards with annual vesting for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 1-07533) (the “2010 Form 10-K”) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.20 | | Form of Option Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.21 | | Form of Option Award Agreement for front loaded awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
10.22 | | Form of Option Award Agreement for basic options awarded out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.23 | | Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2011, between the Trust and Dawn M. Becker (previously filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.24 | | Severance Agreement between the Trust and James M. Taylor dated July 30, 2012 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Trust's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.25 | | Credit Agreement dated as of July 7, 2011, by and among the Trust, as Borrower, the financial institutions party thereto and their permitted assignees under Section 12.6., as Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as a Lead Arranger and Book Manager, and PNC Capital Markets LLC, as a Lead Arranger and Book Manager (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-07533), filed on July 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.26 | | Term Loan Agreement dated as of November 22, 2011, by and among the Trust, as Borrower, the financial institutions party thereto and their permitted assignees under Section 12.6., as Lenders, PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Capital One, N.A., as Syndication Agent, PNC Capital Markets, LLC, as a Lead Arranger and Book Manager, and Capital One, N.A., as a Lead Arranger and Book Manager (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-07533), filed on November 28, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
|
| | |
EXHIBIT INDEX |
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
10.27 | | Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for front loaded awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (File No. 1-07533) (the "2012 Form 10-K") and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.28 | | Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for long-term vesting and retention awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Trust's 2012 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.29 | | Form of Performance Share Award Agreement for shares awarded out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Trust's 2012 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.30 | | Revised Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program and the Trust’s Annual Incentive Bonus Program and basic awards with annual vesting for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the Trust's 2012 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.31 | | First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2013, by and among Federal Realty Investment Trust, each of the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-07533), filed on April 26, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
10.32 | | First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2013, by and among Federal Realty Investment Trust, each of the Lenders party thereto, and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the Trust's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)) |
| | |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith) |
| |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith) |
| |
32.1 | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith) |
| |
32.2 | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith) |
| |
101 | | The following materials from Federal Realty Investment Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (1) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (2) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (3) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity, (4) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (5) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged. |