sv3asr
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 29, 2007
Registration
No. 333-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Forms F-3*
and S-3*
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
General Geophysics Company
(Translation of Registrants Name into English)
|
|
|
|
|
Republic of France |
|
Tour Maine-Montparnasse |
|
Not Applicable |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
33 avenue de Maine
BP 191
75755 Paris CEDEX 15
France
(33) 1 64 47 45 00 |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Registrants Principal Executive
Offices)
CT Corporation System
111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10011
(212) 894-8400
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
Beatrice Place-Faget
Corporate General Counsel
Tour Maine-Montparnasse
33, avenue du Maine
75755 Paris Cedex 15
+33 1 64 47 45 00 |
|
Thomas N. ONeill III
Linklaters 25, rue de Marignan
75008 Paris
France
+33 1 56 43 56 43 |
|
William P. Rogers, Jr.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
City Point
One Ropemaker Street
London EC2Y 9HR
United Kingdom
+44 207 453 1000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: From time to time after this registration statement
becomes effective.
If the only securities being registered on this Form are being
offered pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans,
please check the following
box. o
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the
following
box. þ
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earliest effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a registration statement pursuant to General
Instruction I.C. or a post-effective amendment thereto that
shall become effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant
to Rule 462(e) under the Securities Act, check the
following
box. þ
If this Form is a post-effective amendment to a registration
statement filed pursuant to General Instruction I.C. filed to
register additional securities or additional classes of
securities pursuant to Rule 413(b) under the Securities
Act, check the following
box. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount to be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered/Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Amount of |
|
Title of Each Class of |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Registration |
|
Securities to be Registered |
|
|
Offering Price |
|
|
Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes
|
|
|
$ 600,000,000(1) |
|
|
$ (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees of Senior Notes
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
fee. |
|
(2) |
No separate consideration will be received for the Guarantees. |
|
(3) |
The Registrants have elected to rely on Rule 456(b) and
Rule 457(r) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to defer
payment of the registration fee. |
Table of Additional Registrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address, Including Zip |
|
|
|
|
Code and Telephone Number, |
|
|
|
|
Including Area Code, of |
|
State or Other |
|
I.R.S. Employer | |
Principal Executive Offices |
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|
Identification No. | |
|
|
|
|
| |
CGG Americas Inc.
|
|
Texas |
|
|
74 - 1596771 |
|
|
16430 Park Ten Place
Houston, Texas 77084
(1) 281 646 2400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CGG Canada Services Ltd.
|
|
Alberta, Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
450, 808-4th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta TP3 E8
Canada
(1) 403 266 1011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CGG Marine Resources Norge A/ S
|
|
Norway |
|
|
|
|
|
OH Bangs Vei 70
N-1363 Høvik
Norway
(47) 67 11 34 72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sercel, Inc.
|
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
73 - 1396603 |
|
|
17200 Park Row
Houston, Texas 77084
(1) 281 492 6688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sercel Canada Ltd.
|
|
New Brunswick, Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
1108 55th Avenue, NE
Calgary, Alberta TZE 6Y
Canada
(1) 403 275 3544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sercel Australia Pty Ltd.
|
|
New South Wales, Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
274 Victoria Road |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rydalmere, New South Wales 2116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
(61) 2 8832 5500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CGGVeritas Services Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
20 - 8026762 |
|
|
10300 Town Park Drive
Houston, Texas 77072
(1) 832 351 8300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Veritas DGC Land Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
76 - 0542437 |
|
|
10300 Town Park Drive
Houston, Texas 77072
(1) 832 351 8300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Veritas Geophysical Corporation
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
74 - 1813790 |
|
|
10300 Town Park Drive
Houston, Texas 77072
(1) 832 351 8300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Veritas Investments Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
76 - 0569069 |
|
|
c/o Corporation Trust Center
1209 Orange Street
Wilmington, DE 19801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viking Maritime Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
76 - 0677405 |
|
|
c/o Corporation Trust Center
1209 Orange Street
Wilmington, DE 19801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address, Including Zip |
|
|
|
|
Code and Telephone Number, |
|
|
|
|
Including Area Code, of |
|
State or Other |
|
I.R.S. Employer | |
Principal Executive Offices |
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|
Identification No. | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
76 - 0670383 |
|
|
c/ o Corporation Trust Center
1209 Orange Street
Wilmington, DE 19801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd.
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
74 - 2007144 |
|
|
10300 Town Park Drive
Houston, Texas 77072
(1) 832 351 8300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alitheia Resources Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
56 - 2475147 |
|
|
10300 Town Park Drive
Houston, Texas 77072
(1) 832 351 8300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
This registration statement comprises a filing on
Form F-3 with
respect to the securities of Compagnie Générale de
Géophysique-Veritas, CGG Canada Services Ltd., CGG Marine
Resources Norge A/ S, Sercel Canada Ltd. and Sercel Australia
Pty Ltd. and a filing on
Form S-3 with
respect to the securities of CGG Americas Inc., Sercel, Inc.,
CGGVeritas Services Inc., Veritas DGC Land Inc., Veritas
Geophysical Corporation, Veritas Investments Inc., Viking
Maritime Inc., Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC, Veritas
DGC Asia Pacific Ltd. and Alitheia Resources Inc. |
3
The information in this preliminary
prospectus is not complete and may be changed. This preliminary
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is
not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any
jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
JANUARY 29, 2007.
$600,000,000
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas
$300,000,000 71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015
$300,000,000 % Senior Notes
due 2017
Guaranteed on a senior basis by certain subsidiaries
We are
offering an additional $300,000,000 principal amount of our
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 (the additional notes) and
$300,000,000 principal amount of
our % Senior Notes due 2017 (the
new notes, and together with the additional notes,
the notes).
The Additional Notes
The
additional notes will mature on May 15, 2015. We will pay
interest on the additional notes each May 15 and November 15. We
will make the first payment on May 15, 2007 for interest
accrued and unpaid from November 15, 2006. The additional
notes constitute a further issuance of our
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 first issued in a principal amount of
$165,000,000 on April 28, 2005 and issued in an additional
principal amount of $165,000,000 on February 3, 2006
(together, the existing notes). The sales of the
existing notes were not registered under the Securities Act of
1933 but were the subject of subsequent exchange offers for
identical notes registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The additional notes and the existing notes will be
treated as the same series of notes under the indenture dated
April 28, 2005 pursuant to which the existing notes were
issued.
We may
redeem all or a part of the additional notes at any time on or
after May 15, 2010 at the redemption prices described in
this prospectus. We may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate
principal amount of the existing notes and the additional notes
prior to May 15, 2008 using the proceeds of certain equity
offerings. At any time prior to May 15, 2010, we may redeem
all or part of the additional notes at a redemption price equal
to 100% of the principal amount of the additional notes plus the
applicable premium described in this prospectus. We may also
redeem all, but not less than all, of the additional notes at a
redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
additional notes in the event of certain changes in tax laws. If
we undergo a change of control, each holder may require us to
repurchase all or a portion of the additional notes at 101% of
the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The New Notes
The new
notes will mature on May 15, 2017. We will pay interest on
the new notes each May 15 and November 15. We will make the
first payment on May 15, 2007 for interest accrued and
unpaid from the issue date of the new notes. The new notes will
be issued pursuant to a new indenture. We may redeem all or a
part of the new notes at any time on or after May 15, 2012
at the redemption prices described in this prospectus. We may
redeem up to 35% of the new notes prior to May 15, 2010
using the proceeds of certain equity offerings. At any time
prior to May 15, 2012, we may redeem all or part of the new
notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the new notes plus the applicable premium described in
this prospectus. We may also redeem all, but not less than all,
of the new notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the new notes in the event of certain
changes in tax laws. If we undergo a change of control, each
holder may require us to repurchase all or a portion of the new
notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and
unpaid interest.
The notes
will be our senior unsecured obligations and will be initially
guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by certain of our
subsidiaries. The notes will rank equally in right of payment
with all our other existing and future senior unsecured
indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all our existing
and future subordinated indebtedness. The notes and the
subsidiary guarantees will be effectively subordinated to all
our secured obligations and all secured obligations of our
subsidiaries that guarantee the notes to the extent of the value
of the collateral. The notes will also be effectively junior to
all obligations of our subsidiaries that do not guarantee the
notes.
Application
has been made to admit the notes to listing on the Official List
of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and to trading on the Euro MTF
market (Euro MTF).
Investing in the notes involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 22.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting | |
|
|
|
|
Price to | |
|
discounts | |
|
Proceeds to | |
|
|
public(1) | |
|
and commissions | |
|
issuer | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Additional notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In the case of the additional notes, plus accrued and unpaid
interest from and including November 15, 2006 to but
excluding the delivery date and in the case of the new notes,
plus accrued and unpaid interest from and including the issue
date of the new notes to but excluding the delivery date. |
Delivery
of the notes in book-entry form will be made on or
about ,
2007.
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission, any state securities
commission nor any
non-U.S. securities
authority has approved or disapproved of these securities or
determined that this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Sole Bookrunner and Lead Manager
Credit Suisse
Joint Lead Managers
|
|
|
BNP PARIBAS
|
|
Natexis Bleichroeder Inc. |
Co-Managers
|
|
|
Calyon Securities
|
|
SOCIETE GENERALE |
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2007.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities and may only be used for the purposes for
which it has been published. The information in this document
may only be accurate on the date of this document.
In connection with this offering, Credit Suisse Securities
(Europe) Limited may over-allot or effect transactions for a
limited period of time with a view to supporting the market
price of the notes at a level higher than that which might
otherwise prevail. However, Credit Suisse Securities (Europe)
Limited is not obliged to do this. Such stabilizing, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time, and must be brought
to an end after a limited period.
NOTICE TO INVESTORS
CGGVeritas, having made all reasonable inquiries, confirms to
the best of its knowledge, information and belief that the
information contained in this prospectus with respect to
CGGVeritas and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates
taken as a whole and the notes offered hereby is true and
accurate in all material respects and is not misleading, that
the opinions and intentions expressed in this document are
honestly held and that there are no other facts the omission of
which would make this prospectus as a whole misleading in any
material respect. Subject to the following paragraph, CGGVeritas
accepts responsibility for the information contained in this
prospectus.
The information contained under the section Exchange
Rates includes extracts from information and data publicly
released by official and other sources. While we accept
responsibility for accurately summarizing the information
concerning exchange rate information, we accept no further
responsibility in respect of such information. The information
set out in relation to sections of this prospectus describing
clearing and settlement arrangements, including the sections
entitled Description of the Additional Notes
Book Entry, Delivery and Form and Description of the
New Notes Book Entry, Delivery and Form, is
subject to any change or reinterpretation of the rules,
regulations and procedures of Cede & Co., Euroclear
Bank S.A./ N.V. (Euroclear)
i
or Clearstream Banking, sociètè anonyme
(Clearstream) currently in effect. While we accept
responsibility for accurately summarizing the information
concerning Cede & Co., Euroclear and Clearstream, we
accept no further responsibility in respect of such information.
In addition, this prospectus contains summaries believed to be
accurate with respect to certain documents, but reference is
made to the actual documents for complete information. All such
summaries are qualified in their entirety by such reference.
Copies of documents referred to herein will be made available to
prospective investors upon request to us.
We are providing this prospectus only to prospective purchasers
of the notes. You should read this prospectus before making a
decision whether to purchase any notes.
This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or an
invitation to subscribe for or purchase any of the notes in any
jurisdiction in which such offer or invitation is not authorized
or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or
invitation. No action has been, or will be, taken to permit a
public offering in any jurisdiction where action would be
required for that purpose, other than the United States.
Accordingly, the notes may not be offered or sold, directly or
indirectly, and this prospectus may not be distributed, in any
jurisdiction except in accordance with the legal requirements
applicable to such jurisdiction. You must comply with all laws
that apply to you in any place in which you buy, offer or sell
any notes or possess this prospectus. You must also obtain any
consents or approvals that you need in order to purchase, offer
or sell any notes or possess or distribute this prospectus. We
and the underwriters are not responsible for your compliance
with any of the foregoing legal requirements.
We are not, the underwriters are not, and none of our respective
representatives are making an offer to sell the notes in any
jurisdiction except where an offer or sale is permitted. You
should understand that you will be required to bear the
financial risks of your investment for an indefinite period of
time. This prospectus is based on information provided by us and
by other sources that we believe are reliable. We cannot assure
you that this information is accurate or complete. The
underwriters named in this prospectus make no representation or
warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness
of such information, and nothing contained or incorporated by
reference in this prospectus is, or shall be relied upon as, a
promise or representation by the underwriters with respect to
the notes as to the past or the future.
The information contained in this prospectus speaks as of the
date hereof. Neither the delivery of this prospectus at any time
after the date of publication nor any subsequent commitment to
purchase the notes shall, under any circumstances, create an
implication that there has been no change in the information set
forth in this prospectus or in our business since the date of
this prospectus.
We are not, the underwriters are not, and none of our respective
representatives are making any representation to you regarding
the legality of an investment in the notes by you under any
legal, investment or similar laws or regulations. You should not
consider any information in this prospectus to be legal,
business, tax or other advice. You should consult your own
attorney, business advisor and tax advisor for legal, financial,
business and tax and related aspects of an investment in the
notes. You are responsible for making your own examination of us
and our business and your own assessment of the merits and risks
of investing in the notes.
The notes will be issued in the form of one or more global
notes, which will be deposited with, or on behalf of, a common
depositary for the accounts of Cede & Co., Euroclear
and Clearstream. Beneficial interests in the global notes will
be shown on, and transfers of beneficial interests in the global
notes will be effected only through, records maintained by
Cede & Co., Euroclear and/or Clearstream and their
participants, as applicable. See Description of the
Additional Notes Book Entry, Delivery and Form
and Description of the New Notes Book Entry,
Delivery and Form.
This prospectus sets out the procedures of Cede & Co.,
Euroclear and Clearstream in order to facilitate the original
issue and subsequent transfers of interests in the notes among
participants of Euroclear and Clearstream. However, neither
Cede & Co., Euroclear nor Clearstream is under any
obligation to perform or continue to perform such procedures and
such procedures may be modified or discontinued by either of
them at any time. We will not, nor will any of our agents, have
responsibility for the performance of the respective obligations
of Cede & Co., Euroclear, Clearstream or their
respective participants under the rules and procedures governing
their operations, nor will we or our agents have any
responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records
relating to, or payments made on account of, book-entry
interests held through the facilities of any clearing system or
for
ii
maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to
these book-entry interests. Investors wishing to use these
clearing systems are advised to confirm the continued
applicability of their rules, regulations and procedures.
We reserve the right to withdraw this offering of the notes at
any time. We and the underwriters also reserve the right to
reject any offer to purchase the notes in whole or in part for
any reason or no reason and to allot to any prospective
purchaser less than the full amount of the notes sought by it.
The underwriters and certain of their respective related
entities may acquire, for their own accounts, a portion of the
notes.
This prospectus has not received the visa of the French
Autorité des Marchés Financiers
(AMF) and accordingly may not be used in
connection with any offer or sale of the notes to the public in
France.
This prospectus has been prepared on the basis that all offers
of notes will be made pursuant to an exemption under the
Prospectus Directive, as implemented in member states of the
European Economic Area (EEA), from the requirement
to produce a prospectus for offers of notes. Accordingly any
person making or intending to make any offer within the EEA of
notes which are the subject of the placement contemplated in
this prospectus should only do so in circumstances in which no
obligation arises for us or any of the underwriters to produce a
prospectus for such offer. Neither we nor the underwriters have
authorized, nor do they authorize, the making of any offer of
notes through any financial intermediary, other than offers made
by the underwriters which constitute the final placement of
notes contemplated in this prospectus.
Each person in a Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a
Relevant Member State) who receives any
communication in respect of, or who acquires any notes under,
the offering contemplated in this prospectus will be deemed to
have represented, warranted and agreed to with each underwriter
and us that:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
it is a qualified investor within the meaning of the law in that
Relevant Member State implementing Article 2(1)(e) of the
Prospectus Directive; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
in the case of any notes acquired by it as a financial
intermediary, as that term is used in Article 3(2) of the
Prospectus Directive, (i) the notes acquired by it in the
offer have not been acquired on behalf of, nor have they been
acquired with a view to their offer or resale to, persons in any
Relevant Member State other than qualified investors, as that
term is defined in the Prospectus Directive, or in circumstances
in which the prior consent of the underwriters has been given to
the offer or resale; or (ii) where notes have been acquired by
it on behalf of persons in any Relevant Member State other than
qualified investors, the offer of those notes to it is not
treated under the Prospectus Directive as having been made to
such persons. For the purposes of this representation, the
expression an offer of notes to the public in
relation to any notes in any Relevant Member State means the
communication in any form and by any means of sufficient
information on the terms of the offer and any notes to be
offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or
subscribe for the notes, as the same may be varied in that
Relevant Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus
Directive in that Relevant Member State and the expression
Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/ EC and
includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant
Member State. |
We expect that delivery of the notes will be made against
payment therefor on or about the fifth business day following
the date of pricing of the notes (this settlement cycle being
referred to as T+5). Under
Rule 15c6-1 of the
U.S. Exchange Act, trades in the secondary market generally
are required to settle in three business days, unless the
parties to any such trade expressly agree otherwise.
Accordingly, purchasers who wish to trade notes on the date of
this prospectus or the next succeeding two business days will be
required, by virtue of the fact that the notes initially will
settle in T+5, to specify an alternate settlement cycle at the
time of any such trade to prevent a failed settlement.
Purchasers of the notes who wish to make such trades should
consult their own adviser.
iii
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) applicable
to foreign private issuers. In accordance with the Exchange Act,
we electronically file reports, including annual reports on
Form 20-F and interim reports on
Form 6-K, and
other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
You may obtain these reports and other information by sending a
written request to CGGVeritas, Tour Maine-Montparnasse, 33
avenue de Maine, BP 191, 75755 Paris CEDEX 15, France,
Attention: Investor Relations Officer, Telephone: (33) 1 64
47 45 00.
You can inspect and copy these reports, and other information,
without charge, at the Public Reference Room of the Commission
located at 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You
may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room by calling the Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330. The
Commission also maintains an Internet site at http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically
with the Commission.
In addition, you can inspect material filed by CGG, Veritas and
CGGVeritas at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange,
20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005, on which
American Depositary Shares representing shares of our common
stock are listed. As a foreign private issuer, we are not
subject to the proxy rules under Section 14 or the
short-swing insider profit disclosure rules under
Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
All information referred to above will, for so long as the notes
are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, also be available,
without charge, at the specified office of the Paying Agent in
Luxembourg during usual business hours on any weekday
(Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays excepted) from the date
of this prospectus.
On January 12, 2007, following the completion of the merger
with CGG, Veritas was delisted from the New York Stock
Exchange and filed a Form 15 to terminate its registration
and reporting obligations under the Exchange Act.
PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION
In this prospectus, references to United States or
U.S. are to the United States of America, references
to U.S. dollars or $ are to United
States dollars, references to France are to the
Republic of France, references to Norway are to the
Kingdom of Norway, references to NOK are to
Norwegian kroner and references to euro or
are
to the single currency introduced at the start of the third
stage of European Economic and Monetary Union pursuant to the
Treaty establishing the European Union.
Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this prospectus
relating to market share, ranking and data are derived from
management estimates based, in part, on independent industry
publications, reports by market research firms or other
published independent sources. Any discrepancies in any table
between totals and the sums of the amounts listed in such table
are due to rounding.
As used in this prospectus CGG refers to Compagnie
Générale de Géophysique and its subsidiaries,
except as otherwise indicated, Veritas refers to
Veritas DGC Inc. and its subsidiaries before the merger between
CGG and Veritas and to CGGVeritas Services Inc. following such
merger, except as otherwise indicated, and
CGGVeritas, we, us and
our refer to Compagnie Générale de
Géophysique-Veritas and its subsidiaries, except as
otherwise indicated.
iv
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
The Commission allows us to incorporate by reference
the information we file with the Commission in other documents,
which means:
|
|
|
|
|
incorporated documents are considered part of this prospectus; |
|
|
|
we can disclose important information to you by referring you to
those documents; and |
|
|
|
information that we file with the Commission after the date of
this prospectus and incorporate by reference herein
automatically updates and supersedes this prospectus and
information previously incorporated by reference herein. |
We incorporate by reference the following document that we have
previously filed with the Commission:
|
|
|
|
|
SEC Filing |
|
Filing Date | |
|
|
| |
CGGs Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
May 9, 2006 |
|
In addition, we incorporate by reference each of the following
documents that we will file with the Commission (other than, in
each case, documents or information deemed to have been
furnished and not filed in accordance with the rules of the
Commission) between the date of this prospectus and termination
of the offering of the notes:
|
|
|
|
|
all annual reports on
Form 20-F we file
with the Commission; and |
|
|
|
any future reports furnished on
Form 6-K that
indicate that they are incorporated by reference in this
prospectus. |
You may obtain a copy of any of the documents referred to above
(excluding exhibits) at no cost by contacting us at the
following address:
|
|
|
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas |
|
Tour Maine-Montparnasse |
|
33 avenue de Maine |
|
BP 191 |
|
75755 Paris CEDEX 15 |
|
Attention: Investor Relations Officer |
|
Tel: (33) 1 64 47 45 00 |
In addition, for so long as the notes are listed on the
Luxembourg Stock Exchange, you may obtain a copy of any of the
documents referred to above (excluding exhibits) at no cost
during usual business hours on any weekday (except Saturdays,
Sundays and public holidays) at the specified offices of the
Paying Agent in Luxembourg.
Any statement contained in this prospectus or in a document
incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein
shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for the purposes of
this prospectus to the extent that a statement contained herein,
or in any other subsequently filed document that also is or is
deemed to be incorporated by reference herein, modifies or
supersedes such statement. The modifying or superseding
statement need not state that it has modified or superseded a
prior statement or include any other information set forth in
the document that it modifies or supersedes. The making of a
modifying or superseding statement shall not be deemed an
admission for any purposes that the modified or superseded
statement, when made, constituted a misrepresentation, an untrue
statement of a material fact or an omission to state a material
fact that is required to be stated or that is necessary to make
a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances in
which it was made. Any statement so modified or superseded shall
not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to
constitute a part of this prospectus.
v
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which involve
risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, certain
statements made in the sections entitled Our
Business, Business of CGG, Business of
Veritas and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
You can identify forward-looking statements because they contain
words such as believes, expects,
may, should, seeks,
approximately, intends,
plans, estimates, or
anticipates or similar expressions that relate to
our strategy, plans or intentions. These forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may
change at any time, and, therefore, our actual results may
differ materially from those that we expected. We have based
these forward-looking statements on our current views and
assumptions about future events. While we believe that our
assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult
to predict the impact of known factors, and, of course, it is
impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect
our actual results. All forward-looking statements are based
upon information available to us on the date of this prospectus.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from our expectations (cautionary
statements) are disclosed under Risk Factors
and elsewhere in this prospectus, including, without limitation,
in conjunction with the forward-looking statements included in
this prospectus. All forward-looking information in this
prospectus and subsequent written and oral forward-looking
statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf,
are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary
statements. Some of the factors that we believe could affect our
actual results include:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop an integrated strategy for CGGVeritas; |
|
|
|
difficulties and delays in achieving synergies and cost savings; |
|
|
|
our substantial indebtedness; |
|
|
|
changes in international economic and political conditions and,
in particular, in oil and gas prices; |
|
|
|
exposure to the credit risk of customers; |
|
|
|
our ability to finance our operations on acceptable terms; |
|
|
|
the timely development and acceptance of our new products and
services; |
|
|
|
the complexity of products sold; |
|
|
|
changes in demand for seismic products and services; |
|
|
|
the effects of competition; |
|
|
|
the social, political and economic risks of our global
operations; |
|
|
|
the costs and risks associated with pension and post-retirement
benefit obligations; |
|
|
|
changes to existing regulations or technical standards; |
|
|
|
existing or future litigation; |
|
|
|
difficulties and costs in protecting intellectual property
rights and exposure to infringement claims by others; |
|
|
|
the costs of compliance with environmental, health and safety
laws; |
|
|
|
the timing and extent of changes in currency exchange rates and
interest rates; |
|
|
|
the accuracy of our assessment of risks related to acquisitions,
projects and contracts and whether these risks materialize; |
|
|
|
our ability to integrate successfully the businesses or assets
we acquire, including Veritas; |
|
|
|
our ability to monitor existing and targeted partnerships; |
vi
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to sell our seismic data library; |
|
|
|
our ability to access the debt and equity markets during the
periods covered by the forward-looking statements, which will
depend on general market conditions and on our credit ratings
for our debt obligations; and |
|
|
|
our success at managing the risks of the foregoing. |
We undertake no obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. We caution you that the
foregoing list of important factors may not contain all of the
material factors that are important to you. In addition, in
light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the
forward-looking events discussed in this prospectus might not
occur. When considering forward-looking statements, you should
keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements
included in this prospectus, including those described in the
Risk Factors section of this prospectus.
vii
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This prospectus summary highlights selected information from
this prospectus to help you understand our business and the
terms of the notes. You should carefully read all of this
prospectus, including the consolidated financial statements and
related notes, to understand fully our business and the terms of
the notes, as well as some of the other considerations that may
be important to you in making your investment decision. You
should pay special attention to the Risk Factors
section of this prospectus to determine whether an investment in
the notes is appropriate for you.
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas
We are a leading international provider of geophysical services
and manufacturer of geophysical equipment. We provide
geophysical services principally to oil and gas companies that
use seismic imaging to help explore for, develop and manage oil
and gas reserves by:
|
|
|
|
|
identifying new areas where subsurface conditions are favorable
for the accumulation of oil and gas; |
|
|
|
determining the size and structure of previously identified oil
and gas fields; and |
|
|
|
optimizing development and production of oil and gas reserves
(reservoir management). |
We manufacture and sell our geophysical equipment primarily to
other geophysical service companies.
Following the merger with Veritas, we intend to continue
CGGs segmentation between geophysical services and
products, and to organize our services business both into
geographical operating segments for the western and eastern
hemispheres, and into the following three business lines:
|
|
|
|
|
the land business line for land and shallow water seismic
acquisition and non-exclusive (multi-client) library
sales; |
|
|
|
the offshore business line for marine seismic acquisition,
multi-client library
sales and related services; and |
|
|
|
the processing & reservoir business line for seismic
data processing, data management and reservoir studies. |
Our products segment, which conducts business primarily through
our subsidiary Sercel Holding S.A. and its subsidiaries
(Sercel), manufactures and sells seismic data
acquisition equipment, both for land and offshore use.
On a pro forma basis after giving effect to the merger and the
financing transactions (as defined below), we would have had
total revenue of
1,489.1 million
and
1,470.1 million
and operating income of
125.7 million
and
289.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, respectively under IFRS. See
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information.
Our address is Tour Maine-Montparnasse, 33, avenue de Maine, BP
191, 75755 Paris Cedex 15, France, and our telephone number
is +33 (0) 1 64 47 45 00.
On January 12, 2007, CGG acquired Veritas (the
merger) pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger
dated September 4, 2006 (the merger agreement).
In the merger, CGG issued an aggregate of 46.1 million ADSs
and paid an aggregate of $1.5 billion in cash to holders of
Veritas stock. Upon completion of the merger, CGG was renamed
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas
(abbreviated as CGGVeritas).
1
We believe a number of strategic factors support the merger,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the combination of CGG and Veritas took place in a strong
business environment, as decreasing reserves of oil and gas
companies have been coupled with growing energy consumption
sustained by long-term demand, particularly in China and India; |
|
|
|
the combination of CGG and Veritas creates a strong, global,
pure-play seismic company, offering a broad range of seismic
services, and, through Sercel, geophysical equipment to the
industry across all markets; |
|
|
|
the combination of CGG and Veritas brings together two companies
with strong technological foundations in the geophysical
services and equipment market, as both CGG and Veritas have a
long tradition of providing seismic services both onshore and
offshore; |
|
|
|
the addition of Veritas fleet of seven vessels creates a
combined seismic services business operating the worlds
leading seismic fleet of 20 vessels, including 14 high
capacity 3D vessels; |
|
|
|
multi-client services benefits from two complementary, recent
vintage, well-positioned seismic data libraries; |
|
|
|
CGGs and Veritas respective offerings for land
acquisition services represent strong geographical and
technological complementarities for high-end positioning and
further development of local partnerships; |
|
|
|
CGGs and Veritas respective positions in data
processing and imaging as well as the skills and reputation of
their experts and geoscientists, allow us to create the industry
reference in this segment, with particular strengths in advanced
technologies such as depth imaging, 4D processing and reservoir
characterization as well as a close link with clients through
dedicated centers; |
|
|
|
the merger will not affect Sercels open technology
approach. Sercel will pursue its strategy of maintaining leading
edge technology, offering new generations of differentiating
products and focusing on key markets; and |
|
|
|
with a combined workforce of approximately 7,000 staff operating
worldwide, including Sercel, CGGVeritas will, through continued
innovation, be an industry leader in seismic technology,
services and equipment with a broad base of customers, including
independent, international and national oil companies. |
For a more complete discussion of the merger, see The
Veritas Merger.
|
|
|
Bridge Loan and Senior Credit Facilities |
In order to finance a portion of the cash merger consideration,
on January 12, 2007, CGG drew $700 million under a
senior secured bridge loan facility (the bridge loan
facility) guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries. We
intend to use the net proceeds from this offering plus cash on
hand to repay in full the bridge loan facility.
Also on January 12, 2007, Volnay Acquisition Co. I (which
was subsequently merged with Veritas and Volnay Acquisition
Co. II, with the surviving entity renamed CGGVeritas
Services Inc.) and CGG entered into a senior credit agreement
(the senior facilities), pursuant to which
CGGVeritas Services Inc. borrowed $1 billion under a senior
secured term loan (the term loan facility)
principally for the purpose of financing the remaining portion
of the cash component of the consideration for the merger and
obtained a $115 million senior secured revolving facility
(the U.S. revolving facility). Aggregate
commitments under the U.S. revolving facility are expected
to be increased to $140 million. The senior facilities are
guaranteed by us and certain of our subsidiaries.
We are also planning to enter into a senior secured revolving
credit facility (the French revolving facility),
guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries, of up to
$200 million for working capital purposes.
For a description of the credit facilities above, see
Description of Certain Indebtedness.
2
The borrowings under the term loan facility and the bridge loan
facility and the issuance of the notes offered hereby and the
use of proceeds therefrom are collectively referred to in this
prospectus as the financing transactions.
Our Business
Services accounted for 64% and Products accounted for 36% of
CGGs consolidated operating revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2005. Service operations accounted for 98% and
Veritas Hampson-Russell (VHR), Veritas proprietary
software business, accounted for 2% of Veritas
consolidated revenues for the year ended July 31, 2006.
Veritas provides geophysical services and geophysical software
products but does not manufacture geophysical equipment.
The tables below present CGGs operating revenue (in euros)
by business line for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 and the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 under
IFRS and Veritas revenues (in U.S. dollars) by
business line for the three months ended October 31, 2006
and the fiscal years ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
under U.S. GAAP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months | |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
|
ended | |
|
| |
|
|
September | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, | |
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
) | |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages | |
CGG Operating Revenue by Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Offshore
|
|
|
404.1 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
319.5 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
205.7 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Processing and Reservoir
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
Total Services
|
|
|
603.3 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
552.3 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
388.0 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
|
Products
|
|
|
352.3 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
317.6 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
299.4 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
687.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
months | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
) millions, except percentages | |
|
|
(in $ | |
Veritas Revenues by Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
85.4 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
286.9 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
195.5 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
200.7 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Offshore
|
|
|
105.7 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
405.1 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
331.4 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
272.7 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
Processing and Reservoir
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
90.9 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
Total Services
|
|
|
225.7 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
802.6 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
617.8 |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
549.1 |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
VHR
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
230.8 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
822.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
564.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tables below present CGGs operating revenue (in euros)
by region for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 under IFRS and
Veritas revenues (in
3
U.S. dollars) by region for the three months ended
October 31, 2006 and fiscal years ended July 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 under U.S. GAAP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) | |
CGG Operating Revenue by Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
314.0 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
291.7 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
207.7 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Asia Pacific/Middle East
|
|
|
313.2 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
297.3 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
274.5 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Europe
|
|
|
229.4 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
138.2 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Africa
|
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
90.6 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
687.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended | |
|
|
|
|
October 31, | |
|
Year ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions, except percentages) | |
Veritas Revenues by Region |
Americas
|
|
|
143.4 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
552.4 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
397.8 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
390.6 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Asia Pacific/Middle East
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
138.2 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
124.9 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
81.3 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Europe
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
93.6 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Africa
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
230.8 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
822.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
564.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe we are a leading land seismic contractor,
particularly in difficult terrain. Land seismic acquisition
includes all seismic surveying techniques where the recording
sensor is either in direct contact with, or in close proximity
to, the ground. Our land business line offers integrated
services, including the acquisition and processing of seismic
data on land, in transition zones and on the ocean floor (seabed
surveys). As at September 30, 2006, CGG had 12 land
crews performing specialized 3D and 2D seismic surveys, all of
which were recording data. During its fiscal year 2006, Veritas
had an average of 12 land crews in operation. As at
December 31, 2005, CGGs land survey equipment had a
combined recording capacity of approximately
59,000 channels. As at July 31, 2006, Veritas
land survey equipment had a combined recording capacity of
approximately 52,000 channels. We have developed
partnerships with local seismic acquisition companies in several
countries, including Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and Libya. We bring
to these partnerships our international expertise, technical
know-how, equipment and experienced key personnel as needed,
while local partners provide their logistical resources,
equipment and knowledge of the environment and local market. We
are also continuing to invest in Veritas non-exclusive
land seismic data libraries.
Land activities accounted for 14% of CGGs consolidated
operating revenue and 35% of Veritas consolidated
revenues, for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
July 31, 2006, respectively.
We provide a full range of 3D marine seismic services,
principally in the Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea and off the
coasts of West Africa and Brazil, as well as in the Asia-Pacific
region. The capacity to both acquire and process marine seismic
data is an important element of our overall strategy to maintain
and develop our leading position in marine seismic data
acquisition and processing. We currently operate a combined
fleet of 20 vessels, including 14 high capacity 3D vessels.
Capacity in the combined fleet is balanced between large (more
than
4
10 streamers), medium (six to eight streamers) and smaller
sizes, with all vessels equipped with Sercels solid or
fluid streamers. Time charters allow us to change vessels in
order to keep pace with market developments and provide us with
the security of continued access to vessels without the
significant investment required for ownership.
We undertake both exclusive and multi-client marine surveys.
When we acquire marine seismic data on an exclusive basis, the
customer contracts to pay for and directs the scope and extent
of the survey and retains ownership of the data obtained. In
regions where there is extensive petroleum exploration, such as
Brazil, the Gulf of Mexico, West Africa, the Mediterranean Sea
and the North Sea, we also undertake multi-client surveys, in
which we fund the survey ourselves and retain ownership of the
seismic data. This enables us to provide multiple companies
access to the data by way of license. As a result, we have the
potential to obtain multiple and higher revenues, while our
customers who license the data have the opportunity to pay lower
prices. Multi-client surveys accounted for 42% of CGGs
offshore operating revenue in 2005 and 40% in the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. In the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2006, and the three months ended October 31,
2006, 60% and 61%, respectively of Veritas marine revenues
came from multi-client work.
Offshore activities accounted for 37% of CGGs consolidated
operating revenue and 49% of Veritas consolidated revenues
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and July 31,
2006, respectively.
We provide seismic data processing and reservoir services
through our network of 30 data processing centers and reservoir
teams located around the world. Our seismic data processing
operations transform seismic data acquired in the field into 2D
cross-sections, or 3D images of the earths subsurface or
4D time-lapse seismic data using Geocluster and Hampson-Russell
software, our proprietary seismic software, or third party
applications. These images are then interpreted by geophysicists
and geologists for use by oil and gas companies in evaluating
prospective areas, selecting drilling sites and managing
producing reservoirs. We process seismic data acquired by our
land and marine acquisition crews as well as seismic data
acquired by non-affiliated third parties. Marine seismic data
has been a significant source of the growth in demand for our
data processing services and represents over two-thirds of the
operating revenues generated in our processing centers. In
addition, we reprocess previously processed data using new
techniques to improve the quality of seismic images. We also
license our proprietary software to companies wishing to do
their own geophysical interpretation.
We complement our network of international centers with regional
multi-client centers and dedicated centers that bring processing
facilities within our clients premises. Fifteen of our
data processing centers are dedicated centers that
are located in clients offices. We believe that these
dedicated centers are responsive to the trend among oil and gas
companies to outsource processing work. They also allow us to
provide clients with a high level of service. These centers
enable our geoscientists to work directly with clients and
tailor our services to meet individual clients needs.
We also operate four visualization centers that allow teams of
our customers geoscientists and engineers to view and
interpret large volumes of 3D data.
Processing and reservoir activities accounted for 13% of
CGGs consolidated operating revenue and 14% of
Veritas consolidated revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006, respectively.
Products
We conduct our equipment development and production operations
through Sercel. We believe Sercel is the market leader in the
development and production of seismic acquisition systems and
specialized equipment in the land and offshore seismic markets.
Sercels principal product line is seismic recording
equipment, particularly the 408UL 24-bit recording systems.
Sercel is operated as an independent division and makes most of
its sales to third-party purchasers. Veritas provides
geophysical software but does not produce geophysical equipment.
Sercel currently operates eight seismic equipment manufacturing
facilities, located in Nantes, Saint Gaudens and Toulon in
France, Houston, Sydney, Singapore, Alfreton in England and
Calgary. In China, Sercel operates its activities through
Sercel-JunFeng Geophysical Equipment Co Ltd, based in Hebei
(China), in which Sercel
5
acquired a 51% interest in 2004 and through Xian-Sercel a
manufacturing joint venture with XPEIC (Xian Petroleum Equipment
Industrial Corporation), in which Sercel holds a 40% interest.
In addition, two sites in Massy and Brest (France) are dedicated
to borehole tools and submarine acoustic instrumentation,
respectively.
Purchases by CGG of geophysical equipment from Sercel have
historically been included in intragroup sales. Prior to the
merger, Veritas was a customer of Sercel and following the
merger, purchases by Veritas of geophysical equipment from
Sercel are also included in intragroup sales.
Products accounted for 36% of CGGs consolidated operating
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Our Strategy
We intend to continue to strengthen our competitive position in
the global geophysical services and products markets by
capitalizing on growth opportunities resulting from both the
application of new technologies in every sector of the oil and
gas business from exploration to production and
reservoir management and from our diversified
geographic presence. See Our Business Our
Strategy.
To achieve this objective, we have adopted the following
strategies:
Develop Technological Synergies for Products
and Capitalize on New Generation Equipment.
We believe Sercel is the leading producer of land, marine and
subsea geophysical equipment, particularly in difficult terrain.
We plan to continue developing synergies among the technologies
available within Sercel and to capitalize fully on our position
as a market leader. Through internal expenditures on research
and development, we seek to improve existing products and
maintain an active new product development program in all
segments of the geophysical equipment market (land, marine and
ocean-bottom).
Develop and Utilize Innovative
Technology.
The industry is increasingly demanding clearer seismic imaging
and better visibility, particularly underneath salt layers. We
expect recent technologies such as multi-azimuth,
multi-component (3C/4C) surveys and time-lapse (4D) surveys to
become increasingly important for new production-related
applications, particularly in the marine sector, and expect
specialized recording equipment for difficult terrain to become
more important in land seismic data acquisition, particularly in
transition zones and shallow water. We believe that the combined
technology and know-how of CGG and Veritas will strengthen
research and development capabilities to best serve our client
base.
Emphasize Client Service.
There is an industry trend towards higher quality outsourcing in
the selection of
third-party service
providers. We plan to continue our client service strategy
through: individually tailoring our data acquisition operations;
expanding regional multi-client and dedicated
on-site processing
centers; recruiting and training customer-oriented service
staff; organizing client training seminars focused on our
products and services; developing easy access to our
multi-client data library through the application of
e-business
technologies; developing corporate contracts with our main
clients; and gaining access to new data acquisition markets,
such as subsea and newly opening territories.
Provide Integrated Services.
We are committed to providing clients with a full array of
seismic data services, from acquisition and processing to data
interpretation and management. We believe that integration of
compatible technology and equipment increases the accuracy of
data acquisition and processing, enhances the quality of our
client service and thereby improves productivity in oil and gas
exploration and production.
6
Exploit Strong Data Libraries.
We intend to take advantage of the complementary, recent
vintage, well positioned seismic data libraries of CGG and
Veritas. For example, in the Gulf of Mexico, Veritas data
library is positioned in the Western and Central Gulf while
CGGs data library is in the Central and Eastern Gulf. Data
merging from the CGG and Veritas libraries will provide
potential for cross imaging enhancement and value creation by
applying the latest processing software development to achieve
an optimal image. Onshore, Veritas land library offers
additional potential in North America. Our combined library is a
strength in a market where a global library portfolio is
increasingly attractive to clients.
Develop Reservoir Applications.
Seismic data is mainly used by oil and gas companies for
exploration purposes. However, we are progressively extending
our core business towards compiling and analyzing seismic data
of existing reservoirs. Through high-resolution images and our
expertise in 4D seismic and permanent monitoring, we aim to
assist hydrocarbon producers in better characterizing and
predicting the static properties and dynamic behavior of their
reservoirs.
Industry Conditions
Overall demand for geophysical services and equipment is
dependent on spending by oil and gas companies for exploration,
production development and field management activities. This
spending depends in part on present and expected future oil and
gas prices.
We believe that the outlook for the geophysical services sector
and the demand for geophysical products is fundamentally
positive for a number of reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Economic growth, particularly in more active regions such as
Asia (notably China and India) and Brazil, is generating
increased energy demand and leading to higher energy prices and
increased exploration efforts; |
|
|
|
The need to replace depleting reserves and maximize the recovery
of oil in existing reservoirs should encourage capital
expenditures by companies engaged in exploration and production,
which we expect will benefit the seismic industry; |
|
|
|
The scope of application of geophysical services has
considerably increased over the last several years as a result
of significant research and development efforts. Geophysical
services can now potentially be applied to the entire sequence
of exploration, development and production as opposed to
exploration only. This is particularly true with technologies
such as 4D (time lapse seismic data); and |
|
|
|
The depth and duration of the contraction in the geophysical
sector between 1999 and 2004 may have increased awareness among
geophysical service providers of the risks related to market
overcapacity. |
We believe that the merger puts us in a strong position to
benefit from these industry conditions. See The Veritas
Merger Merger Rationale.
7
SUMMARY FINANCING STRUCTURE
The following diagram summarizes our financing structure and
debt obligations after giving effect to the merger and the
financing transactions. We have listed below only our
subsidiaries that guarantee the senior facilities and the notes
(with the exception of Sercel Canada Ltd., which does not
guarantee the senior facilities). We expect that each of these
subsidiaries (other than Sercel Canada Ltd.) will also guarantee
the French revolving facility. Our other subsidiaries, which
will not initially guarantee the notes, have no obligation to
pay amounts due on the notes. As a result, the notes are
effectively subordinated to existing and future third party
indebtedness and other liabilities of those non-guarantor
subsidiaries. See Risk Factors Risks Related
to the Notes Your right to receive payments on the
notes is effectively junior to most of our existing indebtedness
and possibly all of our future borrowings. For a summary
of the debt obligations identified in this diagram, please see
Description of the Additional Notes,
Description of the New Notes and Description
of Certain Indebtedness.
8
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
We are planning to enter into the French revolving facility of
$200 million. To secure the obligations under the French
revolving facility, we and our subsidiaries acting as guarantors
under the senior facilities intend to grant the same guarantees
and security interests as were granted to secure the obligations
under the senior facilities. |
|
(2) |
The senior facilities include the U.S. revolving facility of
$115 million, which is expected to be increased to
$140 million. There are no drawings under the U.S.
revolving facility as of the date of this prospectus. The senior
facilities are guaranteed by us and the initial guarantors of
the notes shown in the diagram above, other than Sercel Canada
Ltd. As security for CGGVeritas Services Inc.s obligations
under the senior facilities, we have pledged first-priority
security in the shares of CGGVeritas Services Inc. and certain
of our other first-tier subsidiaries, as well as material
first-tier subsidiaries of Veritas. In addition, certain
guarantors have provided (or will provide) first-priority
security interests in certain of their respective tangible and
intangible assets, including (without limitation) certain
vessels, real property, mineral rights, deposit accounts and
intellectual property. |
|
(3) |
CGG issued, on April 28, 2005 and February 3, 2006, an
aggregate of $330 million of its
71/2%
Senior Notes due 2015. The additional notes are being issued as
part of the same series as such notes and pursuant to the same
indenture governing such notes. |
9
SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING
|
|
|
The Issuer |
|
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas |
Securities Offered
|
|
|
Additional notes |
|
$300,000,000 aggregate principal amount of
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 (the additional notes) issued under
an indenture dated as of April 28, 2005. Notes in an
aggregate principal amount of $330,000,000 have been previously
issued under that indenture and are outstanding (the
existing notes). The additional notes and the
existing notes will be treated as the same series of notes under
the indenture. |
|
New notes |
|
$300,000,000 aggregate principal amount
of % Senior Notes due 2017 (the new
notes, and together with the additional notes,
the notes). The new notes will be issued under
a new indenture. |
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Additional notes |
|
May 15, 2015. |
|
New notes |
|
May 15, 2017. |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Additional notes |
|
71/2% per
annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November
15. Interest on the additional notes will accrue from and
including November 15, 2006 and will be paid commencing on
May 15, 2007. |
|
New notes |
|
% per
annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November
15. Interest on the new notes will accrue from and including the
issue date and will be paid commencing on May 15, 2007. |
|
Guarantees |
|
Initially, the notes will be guaranteed on a senior unsecured
basis by CGGVeritas Services Inc., Veritas DGC Land Inc.,
Veritas Geophysical Corporation, Veritas Investments Inc.,
Viking Maritime Inc., Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC, Veritas
DGC Asia Pacific Ltd. and Alitheia Resources Inc. (the
Veritas Guarantors), Sercel Inc., Sercel Canada
Ltd. and Sercel Australia Pty Ltd. (the Sercel
Guarantors) and CGG Americas, Inc., CGG Canada Services
Ltd. and CGG Marine Resources Norge A/ S (the CGG
Guarantors, and together with the Veritas Guarantors and
the Sercel Guarantors, the Initial Guarantors). Our
other subsidiaries, including Exploration Resources, will not
initially guarantee the notes and, in certain circumstances, we
may elect to have the Sercel Guarantors released from their
guarantees of the notes. |
|
|
|
The Veritas Guarantors (excluding their subsidiaries that have
not guaranteed the notes) generated, before consolidation
entries, $384.1 million of revenues, $65.5 million of
operating income and $49.5 million of net income in the
year ended July 31, 2006 and held $807.9 million of
total assets before consolidation entries as at July 31,
2006. They generated, before consolidation entries,
$112.5 million of revenues, $15.2 million of operating
income and $20.4 million of net income in the three-month
period ended |
10
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2006 and held $781.3 million of total
assets before consolidation entries as at October 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
The CGG Guarantors (excluding their subsidiaries that have not
guaranteed the notes) generated, before consolidation entries,
161.0 million
of revenues,
49.8 million
of operating income and
30.7 million
of net income in the year ended December 31, 2005 and held
394.4 million
of total assets before consolidation entries as at
December 31, 2005. They generated, before consolidation
entries,
194.2 million
of revenues,
92.8 million
of operating income and
54.7 million
of net income in the nine-month period ended September 30,
2006 and held
402.1 million
of total assets before consolidation entries as at
September 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
The Sercel Guarantors (excluding their subsidiaries that have
not guaranteed the notes) generated, before consolidation
entries,
146.5 million
of revenues,
10.9 million
of operating income and
6.3 million
of net income in the year ended December 31, 2005 and held
205.9 million
of total assets before consolidation entries as at
December 31, 2005. They generated, before consolidation
entries,
229.3 million
of revenues,
33.6 million
of operating income and
22.3 million
of net income in the nine-month period ended September 30,
2006 and held
208.7 million
of total assets before consolidation entries as at
September 30, 2006. |
|
Ranking |
|
The notes will be our senior unsecured obligations, ranking
equally in right of payment with all our other existing and
future senior unsecured indebtedness and senior in right of
payment to all our existing and future subordinated
indebtedness. The notes and the subsidiary guarantees will be
effectively subordinated to all our secured obligations and all
secured obligations of the subsidiaries that guarantee the
notes, including any indebtedness under our senior facilities or
under the French revolving facility, to the extent of the value
of the collateral. In addition, the notes will be effectively
subordinated to all current and future indebtedness and other
obligations, including trade payables, of our subsidiaries that
do not guarantee the notes. As at September 30, 2006, on a
pro forma basis for the merger and the financing transactions,
there would have been
947 million
of outstanding indebtedness, including accrued interest,
effectively senior to the notes, of which
926 million
would have been secured. As at October 31, 2006,
Veritas
non-guarantor
subsidiaries had no outstanding indebtedness. The Indentures
permit us and our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness
(including additional secured indebtedness), subject to certain
conditions. See Description of Certain Indebtedness. |
|
Optional Redemption |
|
|
|
Additional notes |
|
We may redeem all or a part of the additional notes at any time
on or after May 15, 2010 at the redemption prices described
in this prospectus. We may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate
principal amount of the existing notes and the additional notes
prior to May 15, 2008 using the proceeds of certain equity
offerings. At any time prior to May 15, 2010, we may redeem
all or part of the additional notes at a redemption price equal
to 100% of the principal |
11
|
|
|
|
|
amount of the additional notes plus the applicable premium
described in this prospectus. |
|
New notes |
|
We may redeem all or a part of the new notes at any time on or
after May 15, 2012 at the redemption prices described in
this prospectus. We may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate
principal amount of the new notes prior to May 15, 2010
using the proceeds of certain equity offerings. At any time
prior to May 15, 2012, we may redeem all or part of the new
notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the new notes plus the applicable premium described in
this prospectus. |
|
Change of Control |
|
If we undergo a change of control, each holder may require us to
repurchase all or a portion of the notes held by such holder at
101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid
interest. |
|
Redemption for Changes in
Tax Law |
|
We will be required to pay additional amounts to the holders of
the notes to compensate them for any amounts deducted from
payments to them in respect of the notes on account of certain
taxes and other governmental charges. If we become obliged to
pay such additional amounts as a result of a change in law, the
notes will be subject to redemption, in whole but not in part,
at our option at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount
of the notes. |
|
Certain Covenants and Events of Default |
|
Each of the indentures governing the notes contains certain
covenants and events of default that, among other things, limit
our ability and that of certain of our subsidiaries to: |
|
|
|
incur
or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue preferred shares; |
|
|
|
pay
dividends or make other distributions; |
|
|
|
purchase
equity interests or redeem subordinated indebtedness early; |
|
|
|
create
or incur certain liens; |
|
|
|
create
or incur restrictions on the ability to pay dividends or make
other payments to us; |
|
|
|
enter
into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
issue
or sell capital stock of our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
engage
in sale-and-leaseback transactions; and |
|
|
|
sell
assets or merge or consolidate with another company. |
|
|
|
All of these limitations are subject to a number of important
qualifications and exceptions. In addition, the starting dates
for the calculation of the availability under the various
baskets relating to restricted payments,
indebtedness, liens and other covenants are the same as those
under the indenture governing the existing notes, namely either
January 1, 2005 or April 28, 2005 (depending on the
particular basket). |
12
|
|
|
|
|
If at any time the notes receive ratings of BBB- or higher from
Standard & Poors and Baa3 or higher from
Moodys, and no default or event of default has occurred
and is continuing, certain restrictions, covenants and events of
default will cease to be applicable to the notes for so long as
the notes maintain such ratings. |
|
Taxation |
|
Because the notes constitute obligations and are deemed
to be issued outside the Republic of France for the purposes of
Article 131 quater of the French tax code (Code
général des impôts), payments of principal or
interest on, and other revenues with respect to the notes will
be entitled to the exemption from the withholding tax on
interest set out under Article 125 A III of the French
tax code. Accordingly, such payments do not give the right to
any tax credit from any French source. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
We intend to use the net proceeds of the offering, plus cash on
hand, to repay in full all amounts outstanding under the bridge
loan facility used to finance the merger. See Use of
Proceeds and Description of Certain
Indebtedness Bridge Loan Facility. |
|
Listing |
|
Application has been made to admit the notes to listing on the
Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and to trading on
the Euro MTF. |
|
Governing Law |
|
New York. |
|
Trustee and Principal Paying Agent |
|
The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association. |
|
Luxembourg Listing and Paying Agent |
|
Dexia Banque Internationale à Luxembourg, société
anonyme. |
For further information regarding the notes, see
Description of the Additional Notes and
Description of the New Notes.
Risk Factors
Investment in the notes offered hereby involves certain risks.
You should carefully consider the information under Risk
Factors and all other information included in this
prospectus before investing in the notes.
13
SUMMARY HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING
INFORMATION OF CGG
In accordance with regulations adopted by the European Union in
July 2002, all companies incorporated under the laws of one of
the member states of the European Union and whose securities are
publicly traded within the European Union were required to
prepare their consolidated financial statements for the fiscal
year starting on or after January 1, 2005, on the basis of
accounting standards issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board. Therefore, in accordance with these
requirements, CGG converted from using French generally accepted
accounting principles to IFRS, as adopted by the European Union.
As a first-time adopter of IFRS at January 1, 2005, CGG has
followed the specific requirements described in IFRS 1,
First Time Adoption of IFRS. The options selected for the
purpose of the transition to IFRS are described in the notes to
CGGs audited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Effects of the transition on the
balance sheet at January 1, 2004, the statement of income
for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the balance sheet
at December 31, 2004 are presented and discussed in
Note 30 to CGGs audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The tables below set forth CGGs summary historical
consolidated financial and operating information:
|
|
|
|
|
as at and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005 in accordance with both IFRS and U.S. GAAP; |
|
|
|
as at and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 in
accordance with IFRS; and |
|
|
|
as at and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003 in accordance with U.S. GAAP. |
The following summary historical consolidated financial
information as at and for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004 is derived from CGGs consolidated audited
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
CGGs consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 have been audited by Barbier
Frinault & Autres Ernst & Young and
Mazars & Guérard. The following summary historical
consolidated financial information for the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 is unaudited and is
derived from CGGs unaudited financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited financial statements
include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
accruals, which CGG considers necessary for a fair presentation
of its financial position and results of operations for these
periods. The results of operations for the nine-month periods
presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results
for the full fiscal year.
The tables should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified
in their entirety by reference to, CGGs consolidated
financial statements and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations CGG Results of Operations included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
IFRS differs from U.S. GAAP in certain significant
respects. For a discussion of significant differences between
U.S. GAAP and IFRS as they relate to CGGs
consolidated financial statements and a reconciliation to
U.S. GAAP of CGGs net income and shareholders
equity for 2005 and 2004, see Note 31 to CGGs audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus and Note 3 to CGGs unaudited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at and for the nine | |
|
|
|
|
months ended | |
|
As at and for the | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
year ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except for | |
|
|
per share and ratio data) | |
Amounts in accordance with IFRS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
607.5 |
|
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
687.4 |
|
Other revenues from ordinary activities
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(636.7 |
) |
|
|
(473.2 |
) |
|
|
(670.0 |
) |
|
|
(554.0 |
) |
Gross profit
|
|
|
320.3 |
|
|
|
135.5 |
|
|
|
201.8 |
|
|
|
133.8 |
|
Research and development expenses, net
|
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(86.9 |
) |
|
|
(64.2 |
) |
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
(78.6 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses)
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
19.3 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
217.6 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
Cost of financial debt, net
|
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
|
|
(42.3 |
) |
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
Derivative and other expenses on convertible bonds
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(38.0 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
Other financial income (loss)
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(54.9 |
) |
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
121.0 |
|
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
Attributable to minority interests
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(1)
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
(2.37 |
) |
|
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
Diluted(2)
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
|
|
(2.37 |
) |
|
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
Other Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(3)
|
|
|
10.9 |
x |
|
|
1.7 |
x |
|
|
1.4 |
x |
|
|
1.8 |
x |
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
Working
capital(4)
|
|
|
254.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154.1 |
|
|
|
116.4 |
|
Property, plant & equipment, net
|
|
|
485.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480.1 |
|
|
|
204.1 |
|
Multi-client surveys
|
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.6 |
|
|
|
124.5 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,751.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,565.1 |
|
|
|
971.2 |
|
Financial
debt(5)
|
|
|
430.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400.3 |
|
|
|
249.6 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
850.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
|
|
393.2 |
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at and for the nine | |
|
|
|
|
months ended | |
|
As at and for the | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
year ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except for | |
|
|
per share and ratio data) | |
Other Historical Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORBDA(6)
|
|
|
359.9 |
|
|
|
148.9 |
|
|
|
229.5 |
|
|
|
172.5 |
|
Capital expenditures (property, plant &
equipment)(7)
|
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
75.4 |
|
|
|
125.1 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
|
Capital expenditures for multi-client surveys
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
Net
debt(8)
|
|
|
273.0 |
|
|
|
500.5 |
|
|
|
297.2 |
|
|
|
121.8 |
|
Net
debt(8)/
ORBDA(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
x |
|
|
0.7 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at and for the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nine months | |
|
|
|
|
ended September 30, | |
|
As at and for the year ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except for per share, ratio and operational data) | |
Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
967.7 |
|
|
|
601.6 |
|
|
|
860.8 |
|
|
|
709.5 |
|
|
|
645.6 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
215.0 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
Per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic common stock
holder(1)
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
(1.30 |
) |
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
Diluted common stock
holder(9)
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
(1.30 |
) |
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
|
0.26 |
|
Other Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(3)
|
|
|
8.8 |
x |
|
|
2.0 |
x |
|
|
1.6 |
x |
|
|
1.4 |
x |
|
|
0.5 |
x |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,751.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,573.8 |
|
|
|
975.8 |
|
|
|
924.2 |
|
Financial
debt(5)
|
|
|
436.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416.7 |
|
|
|
266.5 |
|
|
|
232.4 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
811.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689.5 |
|
|
|
372.2 |
|
|
|
413.4 |
|
Operational Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land teams in operations
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Operational
streamers(10)
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Data processing centers
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Basic per share amounts under IFRS and U.S. GAAP have been
calculated on the basis of 17,318,957 issued and
outstanding shares in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006, 11,765,118 issued and outstanding
shares in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005,
12,095,925 issued and outstanding shares in 2005 and 11,681,406
issued and outstanding shares in 2004. Basic per share amounts
under U.S. GAAP have been calculated on the basis of
11,680,718 issued and outstanding shares in 2003. |
|
(2) |
Diluted per share amount under IFRS has been calculated on the
basis of 17,675,616 issued and outstanding shares in the
nine month period ended September 30, 2006,
13,451,097 issued and outstanding shares in the nine month
period ended September 30, 2005, 12,095,925 issued and
outstanding shares in 2005 and 11,681,406 issued and outstanding
shares in 2004. For the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2005, the effect of convertible bonds was
anti-dilutive. |
|
(3) |
For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed
charges, earnings in IFRS consist of income (loss) from
consolidated companies before income taxes, excluding derivative
and other expenses on convertible bonds included in CGGs
income statement for the relevant |
16
|
|
|
period included elsewhere in this
prospectus. Earnings under U.S. GAAP consist of income from
consolidated companies before income taxes and minority
interests, excluding equity in income of affiliates included in
CGGs income statement for the relevant period included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Fixed charges under each of IFRS
and U.S. GAAP consist of net cost of financial debt
(including amortization fees). For the year ended
December 31, 2003, our earnings were insufficient to cover
fixed charges by
13.5 million
under U.S. GAAP.
|
|
(4) |
Working capital consists of trade
accounts and notes receivable, inventories and
work-in-progress, tax
assets, other current assets and assets held for sale less trade
accounts and notes payable, accrued payroll costs, income tax
payable, advance billings to customers, current provisions and
other current liabilities. |
|
(5) |
Financial debt means
total financial debt, including current maturities, capital
leases and accrued interest but excluding bank overdrafts.
Financial debt excludes fees relating to the raising of debt
under IFRS, but includes such fees under U.S. GAAP.
|
|
(6) |
A discussion of ORBDA
(Operating Result Before Depreciation and Amortization,
previously denominated Adjusted EBITDA), including
(i) a reconciliation to net cash provided by operating
activities and (ii) the reasons why our management believes
that a presentation of ORBDA provides useful information to
investors regarding our financial condition and results of
operations, is found in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources ORBDA.
|
|
(7) |
Capital expenditures
is defined as purchases of property, plant and equipment plus
equipment acquired under capital lease.
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of capital
expenditures to purchases of property, plant and equipment and
equipment acquired under capital lease for the periods indicated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months | |
|
For the year | |
|
|
ended September 30, | |
|
ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
117.0 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
Equipment acquired under capital lease
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
75.4 |
|
|
|
125.1 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
Net debt means bank overdrafts, financial debt
including current portion (including capital lease debt) net of
cash and cash equivalents. A discussion of net debt, including
(i) a reconciliation of net debt to financing items of the
CGG balance sheet and (ii) the reasons why our management
believes that a presentation of net debt provides useful
information to investors regarding our financial condition and
results of operations, is found in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Net Debt. |
|
(9) |
Diluted per share amounts under U.S. GAAP have been
calculated on the basis of 17,675,616 issued and
outstanding shares in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006, 13,451,097 issued and outstanding
shares in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005,
12,378,209 issued and outstanding shares in 2005, 11,681,406
issued and outstanding shares in 2004, and 11,760,630 issued and
outstanding shares in 2003. |
|
|
(10) |
Data includes Exploration Resources ASAs streamers (from
and including December 31, 2005) and excludes streamers of
vessels in transit or dry-dock. |
17
SUMMARY HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF
VERITAS
The table below sets forth summary historical consolidated
financial information for Veritas as at and for the three months
ended October 31, 2006 and 2005, and as at and for the
years ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 in each case in
accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The following summary historical consolidated financial
information as at and for the years ended July 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 is derived from Veritas consolidated annual
financial statements under U.S. GAAP included elsewhere in
this prospectus. Veritas consolidated financial statements
as at and for the years ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The following
summary historical consolidated financial information for the
three-month periods
ended October 31, 2006 and 2005 is derived from
Veritas unaudited financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus. The unaudited financial statements include
all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which
Veritas considers necessary for a fair presentation of its
financial position and results of operations for these periods.
The results of operations for the
three-month periods
presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results
for the full fiscal year.
The table below should be read in conjunction with, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the consolidated
financial statements of Veritas and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Veritas Results of Operations
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at and for the three | |
|
|
|
|
months ended October 31, | |
|
As at and for the year | |
|
|
| |
|
ended July 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
2006(1) | |
|
2005(2) | |
|
2004(3) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions, except per share amount) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
230.8 |
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
822.2 |
|
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
564.5 |
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
165.8 |
|
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
623.2 |
|
|
|
519.0 |
|
|
|
495.7 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
(.13 |
) |
|
|
.12 |
|
|
|
(.88 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income tax expense
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
82.2 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
Net income (loss) per common share diluted
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
353.8 |
|
|
|
228.0 |
|
|
|
402.0 |
|
|
|
249.4 |
|
|
|
116.3 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
141.9 |
|
|
|
128.8 |
|
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
|
127.9 |
|
|
|
121.7 |
|
Multi-client data library
|
|
|
324.1 |
|
|
|
333.3 |
|
|
|
296.6 |
|
|
|
316.8 |
|
|
|
313.2 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,175.6 |
|
|
|
954.5 |
|
|
|
1,158.0 |
|
|
|
966.6 |
|
|
|
776.2 |
|
Long-term debt (including current maturities)
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
749.8 |
|
|
|
607.8 |
|
|
|
710.5 |
|
|
|
582.5 |
|
|
|
489.7 |
|
|
Other Historical Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORBDA(4)
|
|
|
123.5 |
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
383.7 |
|
|
|
265.9 |
|
|
|
278.3 |
|
18
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Includes a gain on involuntary conversion of assets of
$2.0 million. |
|
(2) |
Includes a gain on involuntary conversion of assets of
$9.9 million and a release of deferred tax valuation
allowances of $36.9 million. |
|
(3) |
Includes charges of $22.1 million related to a change in
multi-client accounting policies and $7.4 million related
to debt refinancing. The change in multi-client accounting
policies may affect the comparability between periods and is
more fully described in Note 1 of the Veritas consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
(4) |
A discussion of ORBDA (Operating Result Before
Depreciation and Amortization), including (i) a
reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities and
(ii) the reasons why our management believes that a
presentation of ORBDA provides useful information to investors
regarding our financial condition and results of operations, is
found in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources ORBDA. |
19
SUMMARY UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
The following summary unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information is presented in millions of euros and
gives pro forma effect to the merger and the financing
transactions under IFRS and U.S. GAAP as if they occurred
on January 1, 2005, in the case of the pro forma statements
of income, and September 30, 2006, in the case of the pro
forma balance sheet. The pro forma condensed combined statements
of income give pro forma effect to the acquisition of
Exploration Resources and the related financings as if they
occurred on January 1, 2005. The merger and the acquisition
of Exploration Resources reflected in the unaudited pro forma
financial statements using the purchase method of accounting
under U.S. GAAP.
The unaudited pro forma adjustments reflect the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
under U.S. GAAP, the price of CGG ADSs was $32.44, the
average price of CGG ADSs for the period beginning two days
before and ending two days after September 5, 2006 (the
date that the merger was announced); |
|
|
|
under IFRS, the price of CGG ADSs was $40.50, the closing
price on the closing date of the merger; |
|
|
|
each outstanding share of Veritas common stock was converted in
the merger into the right to receive either (i) 2.25 CGG
ADSs (with respect to 50.664% of Veritas total common
stock) or (ii) $75.00 in cash (with respect to 49.336% of
Veritas total common stock); |
|
|
|
the cash consideration paid by CGG in connection with the merger
was financed by a $1.0 billion term loan facility, the
issuance of $600 million in notes offered hereby and cash
on hand; and |
|
|
|
each employee option to purchase shares of Veritas common stock
pursuant to any stock option plan, program or arrangement of
Veritas outstanding at the time of the merger, whether or not
vested, has been cancelled and converted into the right to
receive, for each share of Veritas common stock subject to such
option, an amount in cash equal to the excess, if any, of $75.00
over the exercise price per share under such option (less any
applicable withholding taxes). |
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is
not indicative of the results of operations or the financial
condition of CGGVeritas that would have been achieved had the
merger, the acquisition of Exploration Resources, and the
related financing transactions been completed as of the dates
indicated, nor is the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information indicative of our future results of
operations or financial position. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial information does not reflect any
cost savings or other synergies that may result from the merger
nor does it reflect any special items such as restructuring and
integration costs that may be incurred as a result of the merger.
CGGVeritas reports, and CGG reported, its financial results in
euros and in conformity with IFRS, with a reconciliation to
U.S. GAAP. Veritas reported its financial results in
U.S. dollars and in conformity with U.S. GAAP. IFRS
differs from U.S. GAAP in certain significant respects. For
a discussion of significant differences between U.S. GAAP
and IFRS as they relate to CGGs consolidated financial
statements and a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of CGGs
net income and shareholders equity for 2005 and 2004, see
Note 31 to CGGs audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and Note 3
to CGGs unaudited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. For an explanation of the
differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they apply to
CGGs and Veritas historical accounting treatments,
see Note 2 to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information and
the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, and the
respective consolidated financial statements of CGG for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and as at and for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2006 and the consolidated
financial statements of Veritas for the year ended July 31,
2006 and as at and for the three months ended October 31,
2006, all included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
is based on preliminary estimates and assumptions, which we
believe to be reasonable. In the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial information, the cash to be paid
and CGG ADSs to be issued as merger consideration for
Veritas shares of
20
common stock have been allocated to the Veritas assets and
liabilities based upon preliminary estimates by the management
of CGG of their respective fair values at the date of the
merger. Any difference between the consideration paid and the
fair value of the Veritas assets and liabilities has been
recorded as goodwill. Definitive allocations will be performed
after the effective time of the merger. Accordingly, the pro
forma adjustments relating to the purchase price allocation are
preliminary, have been made solely for the purpose of preparing
the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
and are subject to revision based on the final determination of
fair value after the effective time of the merger. Any such
revisions may be material.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at and | |
|
|
|
|
for the | |
|
|
|
|
nine | |
|
|
|
|
months | |
|
For the | |
|
|
ended | |
|
year ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except for per | |
|
|
share and ratio data) | |
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Income Data in accordance with IFRS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
1,470.1 |
|
|
|
1,489.1 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
430.9 |
|
|
|
292.2 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
289.6 |
|
|
|
125.7 |
|
Net income attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
123.9 |
|
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
Earnings per share basic
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
4.54 |
|
|
|
(0.79 |
) |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
2.1x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data in accordance with IFRS (at end of
period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,863.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity attributable to
shareholders
|
|
|
2,405.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
|
300.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds and notes issued and long-term debt
|
|
|
1,630.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Income Data in accordance with U.S.
GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
1,479.3 |
|
|
|
1,474.4 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
439.2 |
|
|
|
288.3 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
278.5 |
|
|
|
105.8 |
|
Net income attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
1.2x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data in accordance with U.S. GAAP (at
end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,524.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity attributable to
shareholders
|
|
|
2,018.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
|
300.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
63.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds and notes issued and long-term debt
|
|
|
1,656.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
21
RISK FACTORS
An investment in the notes involves risks. Before
investing in the notes, you should carefully consider the
following risk factors and all information contained in this
prospectus. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are
not aware or that we believe are immaterial may also adversely
affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of
operations or prospects. If any of these events occur, our
business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations
or prospects could be materially and adversely affected. If that
happens, we may not be able to pay interest or principal on the
notes when due and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
|
We are subject to certain risks related to acquisitions,
including the merger, and these risks may materially adversely
affect our revenues, expenses, operating results and financial
condition. |
The merger involves the integration of CGG and Veritas, two
companies that have previously operated independently and as
competitors. CGG and Veritas entered into the merger with the
expectation that, among other things, the merger would enable us
to achieve expected cost synergies from having one rather than
two public companies as well as the redeployment of support
resources towards operations and premises rationalization.
Achieving the benefits of the merger will depend in part upon
meeting the challenges inherent in the successful combination
and integration of global business enterprises of the size and
scope of CGG and Veritas and the possible resulting diversion of
management attention for an extended period of time. There can
be no assurance that we will meet these challenges and that such
diversion will not negatively affect our operations. In
addition, delays encountered in the transition process could
have a material adverse effect on our revenues, expenses,
operating results and financial condition. There can be no
assurance that we will actually achieve anticipated synergies or
other benefits from the merger.
In addition, in the past we have grown by acquisition, and we
may acquire companies or assets in the future. Such
acquisitions, whether completed or in the future, present
various financial and management-related risks, including
integration of the acquired businesses in a cost-effective
manner; implementation of a combined intended business strategy;
diversion of our managements attention; outstanding or
unforeseen legal, regulatory, contractual, labor or other issues
arising from the acquisitions; additional capital expenditure
requirements; retention of customers; integration of different
company and management cultures; operation in new geographic
markets; the need for more extensive management coordination;
and retention, hiring and training of key personnel. Should any
of these risks associated with acquisitions materialize, it
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
We are subject to risks related to our international
operations that could harm our business and results of
operations. |
With operations worldwide, and with a majority of our revenues
likely to be derived outside of the United States and Western
Europe, including in emerging markets, our business and results
of operations will be subject to various risks inherent in
international operations. These risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
instability of foreign economies and governments; |
|
|
|
risks of war, terrorism, civil disturbance, seizure,
renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts; and |
|
|
|
foreign exchange restrictions, sanctions and other laws and
policies affecting taxation, trade and investment. |
We are exposed to these risks in all of our foreign operations
to some degree, and our exposure could be material to our
financial condition and results of operations in emerging
markets where the political and legal environment is less stable.
While we carry insurance against political risks associated with
such operations in amounts we consider appropriate in accordance
with industry practices, we cannot assure you that we will not
be subject to material
22
adverse developments with respect to our international
operations or that our coverage will be adequate to cover us for
any losses arising from such risks.
Revenue generating activities in certain foreign countries may
require prior United States government approval in the form of
an export license and may otherwise be subject to tariffs and
import/export restrictions. These laws can change over time and
may result in limitations on our ability to compete globally. In
addition,
non-U.S. persons
employed by our separately incorporated
non-U.S. entities
will conduct business in some foreign jurisdictions that have
been subject to U.S. trade embargoes and sanctions by the
U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control. CGG and Veritas have
typically generated revenue in these countries through the
performance of data processing, reservoir consulting services
and the sale of software licenses and software maintenance. We
have current and ongoing relations with customers in these
countries. CGG and Veritas did, and we do, have procedures in
place to conduct these operations in compliance with applicable
U.S. laws. However, failure to comply with U.S. laws
on foreign operations could result in material fines and
penalties and damage to our reputation. In addition, our
activities in these countries could reduce demand for our
securities among certain investors.
We and certain of our subsidiaries and affiliated entities also
conduct business in countries which experience government
corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance
with all applicable laws and our codes of ethics, but there is a
risk that we, our subsidiaries or affiliated entities or our
respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take
action in violation of applicable laws, including the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act of 1977. Any such violations could result
in substantial civil and/or criminal penalties and might
materially adversely affect our business and results of
operations or financial condition.
|
|
|
We invest significant amounts of money in acquiring and
processing seismic data for multi-client surveys and for our
data library without knowing precisely how much of the data we
will be able to sell or when and at what price we will be able
to sell the data. |
We invest significant amounts of money in acquiring and
processing seismic data that we will own. By making such
investments, we are exposed to risks that:
|
|
|
|
|
We may not fully recover the costs of acquiring and processing
the data through future sales. The amounts of these data sales
are uncertain and depend on a variety of factors, many of which
are beyond our control. In addition, the timing of these sales
is unpredictable and sales can vary greatly from period to
period. Technological or regulatory changes or other
developments could also materially adversely affect the value of
the data. |
|
|
|
The value of our multi-client data could be significantly
adversely affected if any material adverse change occurs in the
general prospects for oil and gas exploration, development and
production activities in the areas where we acquire multi-client
data. |
|
|
|
Any reduction in the market value of such data will require us
to write down our recorded value, which could have a significant
material adverse effect on our results of operations. |
For example, in its fiscal years 2003 and 2002, Veritas incurred
$4.9 million and $55.3 million, respectively, in
impairment charges related to surveys with relatively low levels
of sales in its multi-client library. These surveys were found
to be impaired for various reasons, including slow acreage
turnover in the case of U.S. land surveys, a border dispute
in the case of a Shetland-Faroes survey and excessive
acquisition cost in the case of a Gulf of Mexico survey. In
addition, a decision by the Norwegian government on
March 31, 2006 not to award exploration-production licenses
in the area where one of CGGs surveys is located (Moere)
changed CGGs previous estimate of future sales, and caused
this
4.6 million
survey to be fully depreciated at March 31, 2006.
Additionally, each of our individual surveys has a minimum book
life based on its location, so particular surveys may be subject
to significant amortization even though sales of licenses
associated with that survey are weak or non-existent, thus
reducing our profits.
23
|
|
|
Our results of operations may be significantly affected by
currency fluctuations. |
We derive a substantial amount of our revenues from
international sales, subjecting us to risks relating to
fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Our revenues and
expenses are denominated in currencies including the euro, the
U.S. dollar and, to a significantly lesser extent, other
non-euro Western European currencies, principally the British
pound and the Norwegian kroner. Historically, a significant
portion of CGGs revenues that were invoiced in euros
related to contracts that were effectively priced in
U.S. dollars, as the U.S. dollar often serves as the
reference currency when bidding for contracts to provide
geophysical services. CGGs U.S. dollar-linked
revenues have increased considerably over the last few years due
to increased sales outside of Europe.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate of the euro against such other
currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar, can have a
significant effect upon our results of operations, which are
reported in euros. The merger will increase both our
dollar-denominated revenues and expenses, as Veritas
revenues and expenses have historically been denominated largely
in U.S. dollars. In addition, since we participate in
competitive bids for data acquisition contracts that are
denominated in U.S. dollars, a depreciation of the
U.S. dollar against the euro harms our competitive position
against companies whose costs and expenses are denominated to a
greater extent in U.S. dollars. For financial reporting
purposes, such depreciation will negatively affect our reported
results of operations since U.S. dollar-denominated
earnings that are converted to euros are stated at a decreased
value. While CGG has in the past attempted to reduce the risks
associated with such exchange rate fluctuations through its
hedging policy, we cannot assure you that we will be effective
or that fluctuations in the values of the currencies in which we
operate will not materially adversely affect our future results
of operations.
|
|
|
Our working capital needs are difficult to forecast and
may vary significantly, which could result in additional
financing requirements that we may not be able to meet on
satisfactory terms, or at all. |
It will be difficult for us to predict with certainty our
working capital needs. This difficulty is due primarily to
working capital requirements related to the marine seismic
acquisition business and related to the development and
introduction of new lines of geophysical equipment products. For
example, under specific circumstances, we may extend the length
of payment terms we grant to customers or increase our
inventories substantially. We may therefore be subject to
significant and rapid increases in our working capital needs
that we may have difficulty financing on satisfactory terms, or
at all, due to limitations in our debt agreements.
|
|
|
Technological changes and new products and services are
frequently introduced in the market, and our technology could be
rendered obsolete by these introductions, or we may not be able
to develop and produce new and enhanced products on a
cost-effective and timely basis. |
Technology changes rapidly in the seismic industry, and new and
enhanced products are frequently introduced in the market for
our products and services, particularly in our equipment
manufacturing and data processing and geosciences sectors. Our
profitability and ability to generate cash depends to a
significant extent upon our ability to develop and produce new
and enhanced products and services on a cost-effective and
timely basis in accordance with industry demands. While we
commit substantial resources to research and development, we may
encounter resource constraints or technical or other
difficulties that could delay the introduction of new and
enhanced products and services in the future. In addition, the
continuing development of new products risks making our older
products obsolete. New and enhanced products and services, if
introduced, may not gain market acceptance and may be materially
adversely affected by technological changes or product or
service introductions by one of our competitors.
|
|
|
We rely on significant customers, so the loss of a single
customer or a few customers could have a material adverse effect
on our operating revenues and business. |
A relatively small number of our clients account for a
significant percentage of our revenues. These clients include
clients that were significant to each of CGG and Veritas prior
to the merger. The loss of a significant amount of the business
of any of these clients (either as a result of external factors
such as the economic environment or a breakdown of a client
relationship) could cause shortfalls against financial targets
and may have
24
a material adverse effect on our operating revenues and
business. Certain of the master agreements governing the
relationship of Veritas with some of these clients are
terminable at will by such clients.
|
|
|
The nature of our business subjects us to significant
ongoing operating risks for which we may not have adequate
insurance or for which we may not be able to procure adequate
insurance on economical terms, if at all. |
Our seismic data acquisition activities, particularly in
deepwater marine areas, are often conducted under harsh weather
and other hazardous operating conditions. These operations are
subject to risks of loss to property and injury to personnel
from fires, accidental explosions, ice floes and high seas.
These types of events could result in loss from business
interruption, delay, equipment destruction or other liability.
We carry insurance against the destruction of or damage to our
seismic equipment and against business interruption for our data
processing activities in amounts we consider appropriate in
accordance with industry practice. However, our insurance
coverage may not be adequate in all circumstances or against all
hazards, and we may not be able to maintain adequate insurance
coverage in the future at commercially reasonable rates or on
acceptable terms.
|
|
|
A reduction in our seismic fleet could materially
adversely affect our operating revenues and business. |
We rely on our fleet of seismic vessels to perform offshore
surveys. We own certain of our vessels and we charter others
from their owners for contractually agreed periods. Although our
fleet has grown and improved through recent upgrades and the
acquisitions of Exploration Resources and Veritas, if the number
or quality of our vessels available for surveys were to
diminish, our capacity to conduct surveys would be reduced. A
reduction in the number of available vessels could result from
damage or destruction to them or other property loss, injury to
personnel, or because we cannot enter into or renew charters on
economically reasonable terms or at all. Of our 20 vessels,
two have charters ending before December 31, 2008. Any such
reduction in the size or quality of our fleet may have a
material adverse effect on our operating revenues and business.
Moreover, it is difficult to bring new vessels into service
because of substantial backlog and capacity constraints at
shipyards globally. The adverse consequences experienced by a
reduction in the size of our fleet would be exacerbated by a
corresponding inability to replace such a lost vessel in a
commercially timely manner.
|
|
|
Compliance with internal controls procedures and
evaluations and attestation requirements will require
significant efforts and resources and may result in the
identification of significant deficiencies or material
weaknesses. |
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
we will be required, for 2006, as a foreign private issuer, to
perform an evaluation of our internal controls over financial
reporting and have our independent auditors publicly disclose
their conclusions regarding such evaluation. CGG established
procedures in 2006 in order to comply with Section 404 in
the timeframe permitted under the regulations of the SEC. We
expect that ensuring compliance with these requirements will be
a substantial and time-consuming process. If we fail to complete
these procedures and the required evaluation in a timely manner,
or if our independent auditors cannot attest to its evaluation
in a timely manner, we could be subject to regulatory review and
penalties that may result in a loss of public confidence in our
internal controls and our access to the U.S. public capital
markets could be hindered. In addition, we may uncover
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal
controls. Measures taken by us to remedy these issues may
require significant efforts, dedicated time and expenses, as
well as the commitment of significant managerial resources. Each
of these circumstances may have a material adverse effect on our
business, ability to raise financing for its business, financial
condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
We depend on proprietary technology and are exposed to
risks associated with the misappropriation or infringement of
that technology. |
Our results of operations depend in part upon our proprietary
technology. We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks and
trade secret laws to establish and protect our proprietary
technology. We currently hold or have applied for 160 patents in
various countries for products and processes. These patents last
between four and twenty years, depending on the date of filing
and the protection accorded by each country. In addition, we
enter into confidentiality and license agreements with our
employees, customers and potential customers and
25
limit access to and distribution of our technology. However,
actions that we take to protect our proprietary rights may not
be adequate to deter the misappropriation or independent
third-party development of our technology. Although none of
CGGVeritas, CGG or Veritas has been involved in any material
litigation regarding its intellectual property rights or the
possible infringement of intellectual property rights of others,
such litigation may be brought in the future. In addition, the
laws of certain foreign countries do not protect proprietary
rights to the same extent as either the laws of France or the
laws of the United States, which may limit our ability to pursue
third parties that misappropriate our proprietary technology.
|
|
|
A failure to attract and retain qualified employees may
materially adversely affect our future business and
operations. |
Our future results of operations will depend in part upon our
ability to retain our existing highly skilled and qualified
employees and to attract new employees. A number of our
employees are highly skilled scientists and highly trained
technicians, and failure by us to continue to attract and retain
such individuals could materially adversely affect our ability
to compete in the geophysical services industry.
We compete with other seismic products and services companies
and, to a lesser extent, companies in the oil industry for
skilled geophysical and seismic personnel, particularly in
times, such as the present, when demand for seismic services is
relatively high. A limited number of such skilled personnel is
available, and demand from other companies may limit our ability
to fill our human resources needs. If we are unable to hire,
train and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees,
this could impair our ability to manage and maintain our
business and to develop and protect our know-how. Our success
will also depend to a significant extent upon the abilities and
efforts of members of our senior management, the loss of whom
could materially adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
In addition, key employees may depart because of issues relating
to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not
to remain with CGGVeritas following the merger. Although
following the merger we have not observed significant departures
of key scientific and technical personnel, several members of
Veritas senior management have agreed to provide
consulting services for a limited period of time but will no
longer be employed by us. Accordingly, no assurance can be given
that we will be able to attract or retain key employees to the
same extent that CGG and Veritas have been able to attract or
retain their own employees in the past. Any failure to do so
could have a material adverse effect on our business and results
of operations.
|
|
|
The financial statements and other financial information
of Veritas presented in this prospectus and used to prepare the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
presented in this prospectus and the pro forma financial
information itself may not be indicative of the results of
Veritas as part of our group. |
This prospectus contains unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information, which gives effect to the merger and the
financing transactions. The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial information is based on preliminary estimates
and assumptions which we believe to be reasonable and is being
furnished solely for illustrative purposes and is not
necessarily indicative of what our combined results of
operations and financial condition would have been had the
merger and financing transactions occurred on January 1,
2005 or on September 30, 2006, respectively. The historical
results of operations and other financial information of Veritas
presented in this prospectus were reported in U.S. dollars in
accordance with U.S. GAAP (not IFRS) and are not
necessarily indicative of the contribution of Veritas
operations to CGGVeritas. See Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Financial Information, Business
of Veritas and The Veritas Merger Merger
Rationale. IFRS differs in material respects from
U.S. GAAP including with respect to such matters as the
accounting treatment of development costs and revenue
recognition and consolidation policies. We are currently
assessing the impact of Veritas results of operations on
our future consolidated IFRS financial statements. As a result,
you should not place undue reliance on our unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial information presented in this
prospectus.
26
|
|
|
CGG and Veritas have had losses in the past and we cannot
assure that we will be profitable in the future. |
CGG recorded net losses in 2004 and 2005 (attributable to
shareholders) of
6.4 million
and
7.8 million,
respectively, although excluding the accounting impact under
IFRS of its 7.75% subordinated convertible bonds due 2012
denominated in U.S. dollars, its net income would have been
positive. Veritas recorded a net loss of $59.1 million in
its fiscal year 2003. We cannot assure you that we will be
profitable in the future.
Risks Related to the Industry
|
|
|
We depend on capital expenditures by the oil and gas
industry, and reductions in such expenditures may have a
material adverse effect on our business. |
Demand for the products and services of CGG and Veritas has
historically been dependent upon the level of capital
expenditures by oil and gas companies for exploration,
production and development activities. These expenditures are
significantly influenced by oil and gas prices and by
expectations regarding future oil and gas prices. Oil and gas
prices may fluctuate based on relatively minor changes in the
supply of and demand for oil and gas, expectations regarding
future supply of and demand for oil and gas and certain other
factors beyond our control. Lower or volatile oil and gas prices
tend to limit the demand for seismic services and products.
Factors affecting the prices of oil and gas include:
|
|
|
|
|
demand for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids; |
|
|
|
worldwide political, military and economic conditions, including
political developments in the Middle East, economic growth
levels and the ability of OPEC to set and maintain production
levels and prices for oil; |
|
|
|
levels of oil and gas production; |
|
|
|
the price and availability of alternative fuels; |
|
|
|
policies of governments regarding the exploration for and
production and development of oil and gas reserves in their
territories; and |
|
|
|
global weather conditions. |
Although oil and gas prices are currently high compared with
historical values, which generally increases demand for seismic
products and services, the markets for oil and gas historically
have been volatile and are likely to continue to be so in the
future.
We believe that global geopolitical uncertainty or uncertainty
in the Middle Eastern producing regions (where we are
particularly active) could lead oil companies to suddenly delay
or cancel current geophysical projects. Any events that affect
worldwide oil and gas supply, demand or prices or that generate
uncertainty in the market could reduce exploration and
development activities and materially adversely affect our
operations. We cannot assure you as to future oil and gas prices
or the resulting level of industry spending for exploration,
production and development activities.
|
|
|
We are subject to intense competition, which could limit
our ability to maintain or increase our market share or to
maintain our prices at profitable levels. |
Most of our contracts are obtained through a competitive bidding
process, which is standard for the seismic services industry in
which we operate. Competitive factors in recent years have
included price, crew availability, technological expertise and
reputation for quality, safety and dependability. While no
single company competes with us in all of our segments, we are
subject to intense competition in each of our segments. We
compete with large, international companies as well as smaller,
local companies. In addition, we compete with major service
providers and government-sponsored enterprises and affiliates.
Some of our competitors operate more data acquisition crews than
we do and have greater financial and other resources. These and
other competitors may be better positioned to withstand and
adjust more quickly to volatile market conditions, such as
fluctuations in oil and gas prices and production levels, as
well as changes in government regulations. In addition, if
geophysical
27
service competitors increase their capacity in the future (or do
not reduce capacity if demand decreases), the excess supply in
the seismic services market could apply downward pressure on
prices. The negative effects of the competitive environment in
which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
|
|
|
We have high levels of fixed costs that are incurred
regardless of our level of business activity. |
We have high fixed costs. As a result, downtime or low
productivity due to, among other things, reduced demand, weather
interruptions, equipment failures or other causes could result
in significant operating losses. Low utilization rates may
hamper our ability to recover the cost of necessary capital
investments.
|
|
|
Our land and marine seismic acquisition revenues vary
significantly during the year. |
Our land and marine seismic acquisition revenues are partially
seasonal in nature. The offshore data acquisition business is,
by its nature, exposed to unproductive interim periods due to
necessary repairs or transit time from one operational zone to
another during which revenue is usually not recognized. Other
factors that cause variations from quarter to quarter include
the effects of weather conditions in a given operating area, the
internal budgeting process of some important clients relative to
their exploration expenses, the timing of the receipt and
commencement of contracts for data acquisition, the timing of
offshore lease sales and the effect of such timing on the demand
for geophysical activities and the timing of sales of licenses
to geophysical data in our multi-client data library, which may
be significant and which are not typically made in a linear or
consistent pattern. Combined with our high fixed costs, these
revenue fluctuations could produce unexpected material adverse
effects on our results of operations in any fiscal period.
|
|
|
Our business is subject to governmental regulation, which
may adversely affect our future operations. |
Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, provincial,
state, foreign and local laws and regulations, including
environmental, health and safety laws. We need to invest
financial and managerial resources to comply with these laws and
related permit requirements. Our failure to do so could result
in fines or penalties, enforcement actions, claims for personal
injury or property damages, or obligations to investigate and/or
remediate contamination. Failure to timely obtain the required
permits may also result in crew downtime and operating losses.
Moreover, if applicable laws and regulations, including
environmental, health and safety requirements, or the
interpretation or enforcement thereof, become more stringent in
the future, we could incur capital or operating costs beyond
those currently anticipated. The adoption of laws and
regulations that directly or indirectly curtail exploration by
oil and gas companies could also materially adversely affect our
operations by reducing the demand for our geophysical products
and services.
Risks Related to our Indebtedness
|
|
|
Our substantial debt could adversely affect our financial
health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations. |
We have a significant amount of debt. As at September 30,
2006, on a pro forma basis to reflect the merger and the
financing transactions, our total financial debt, total assets
and shareholders equity would have been
1,702 million,
4,863 million
and
2,406 million,
respectively. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
generate sufficient cash to service our debt or sufficient
earnings to cover fixed charges in future years.
Our substantial debt could have important consequences. In
particular, it could:
|
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult to satisfy our obligations with respect
to the notes; |
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry conditions; |
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working
capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate
purposes; |
28
|
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our businesses and the industries in which we operate; |
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and |
|
|
|
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants
of our indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow
additional funds. |
|
|
|
Our debt agreements contain restrictive covenants that may
limit our ability to respond to changes in market conditions or
pursue business opportunities. |
The indentures governing the notes and Veritas convertible
notes and the agreements governing our credit facilities
(including the senior facilities and the French revolving
facility) contain restrictive covenants that limit our ability
and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue preferred
shares; |
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions; |
|
|
|
purchase equity interests; |
|
|
|
create or incur certain liens; |
|
|
|
create or incur restrictions on the ability to pay dividends or
make other payments to us; |
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
issue or sell capital stock of subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
engage in sale-and-leaseback transactions; and |
|
|
|
sell assets or merge or consolidate with another company. |
Complying with the restrictions contained in some of these
covenants requires us to meet certain ratios and tests, notably
with respect to consolidated interest coverage, total assets,
net debt, equity and net income. The requirement that we comply
with these provisions may materially adversely affect our
ability to react to changes in market conditions, take advantage
of business opportunities we believe to be desirable, obtain
future financing, fund needed capital expenditures, finance our
equipment purchases, increase research and development
expenditures, or withstand a continuing or future downturn in
our business.
|
|
|
If we are unable to comply with the restrictions and
covenants in the indentures and debt agreements governing the
notes and other debt, there could be a default under the terms
of these indentures and agreements, which could result in an
acceleration of repayment. |
If we are unable to comply with the restrictions and covenants
in the indentures governing the notes or in current or future
debt agreements, including agreements governing the senior
facilities and the French revolving facility, there could be a
default under the terms of these indentures and agreements. Our
ability to comply with these restrictions and covenants,
including meeting financial ratios and tests, may be affected by
events beyond our control. See Description of the
Additional Notes, Description of the New Notes
and Description of Certain Indebtedness. As a
result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with
these restrictions and covenants or meet these tests. In the
event of a default under these agreements, lenders could
terminate their commitments to lend or accelerate the loans and
declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. Borrowings under
other debt instruments that contain cross-acceleration or
cross-default provisions may also be accelerated and become due
and payable. If any of these events occur, our assets might not
be sufficient to repay in full all of our outstanding
indebtedness, including the notes offered hereby, and we may be
unable to find alternative financing. Even if we could obtain
alternative financing, it might not be on terms that are
favorable or acceptable to us.
29
|
|
|
We and our subsidiaries may incur substantially more
debt. |
We and our subsidiaries may incur substantial additional debt
(including secured debt) in the future. Some or all of this debt
could rank senior to the notes. The terms of the indentures
governing the notes and our existing senior indebtedness will
limit, but not prohibit, us and our subsidiaries from doing so.
As of the date of this prospectus, we have no outstanding
drawings under our $115 million U.S. revolving
facility. In addition, we have drawn $700 million under our
bridge loan facility, which we intend to refinance entirely with
the proceeds of this offering and cash on hand, and
$1 billion under our term loan facility to finance the cash
component of the consideration for the merger. If new debt is
added to the current debt levels of us and our subsidiaries, the
related risks for us could intensify.
|
|
|
To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant
amount of cash, and our ability to generate cash will depend on
many factors beyond our control. |
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our
indebtedness, and to fund planned capital expenditures will
partly depend on our ability to generate cash in the future.
This ability is, to a certain extent, subject to general
economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and
other factors that are beyond our control. See
Risks Related to Our Business and
Risks Related to the Industry.
We cannot assure you that we will generate sufficient cash flow
from operations, that we will realize operating improvements on
schedule or that future borrowings will be available to us in an
amount sufficient to enable us to service and repay our
indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we are
unable to satisfy our debt obligations, we may have to undertake
alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or
restructuring our indebtedness, selling assets, reducing or
delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional
capital. We cannot assure you that any refinancing or debt
restructuring would be possible, that any assets could be sold
or that, if sold, the timing of the sales and the amount of
proceeds realized from those sales, or that additional financing
could be obtained on acceptable terms.
|
|
|
Our results of operations could be materially adversely
affected by changes in interest rates. |
Our sources of liquidity include credit facilities and debt
securities which are or may be subject to variable interest
rates. In particular, the term loan facility is subject to
interest based on U.S. dollar LIBOR. As a result, our
interest expenses could increase significantly if short-term
interest rates increase. Each 50 basis point increase in
the LIBOR will increase our pro forma interest expense by
approximately $5 million per year.
Risks Related to the Notes
|
|
|
Your right to receive payments on the notes is effectively
junior to most of our existing indebtedness and possibly all of
our future borrowings. |
The notes effectively rank behind all of our secured
indebtedness, to the extent of the assets which secure such
indebtedness, including borrowings under the term loan facility
and any future borrowings under our U.S. revolving facility and
French revolving facility. In the event of any foreclosure,
dissolution, winding-up, liquidation, reorganization,
administration or other bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding of
an entity that has secured obligations, holders of secured
indebtedness will have prior claims to our assets or the
relevant guarantors assets that constitute their
collateral.
Only certain of our subsidiaries will initially guarantee the
notes. Our other subsidiaries have no obligation to pay amounts
due on the notes and will not initially guarantee the notes. As
a result, the notes are effectively subordinated to existing and
future third party indebtedness and other liabilities, including
trade payables, of those non-guarantor subsidiaries. The CGG
Guarantors and the Sercel Guarantors (excluding their
subsidiaries that have not guaranteed the notes) generated,
before consolidation entries,
307.5 million
of revenue,
60.7 million
of operating income and
37.0 million
of net income in the year ended December 31, 2005 and held
600.3 million
of total assets (before consolidation entries) as at
December 31, 2005. The CGG Guarantors and the Sercel
Guarantors generated, before consolidation entries,
423.5 million
of revenue,
126.4 million
of operating income and
77.0 million
of net income in the nine months ended September 30, 2006
and held
30
610.8 million
of total assets (before consolidation entries) as at
September 30, 2006. The Veritas Guarantors (excluding their
subsidiaries that have not guaranteed the notes) generated,
before consolidation entries, $384.1 million of revenue,
$65.5 million of operating income and $49.5 million of
net income in the year ended July 31, 2006 and held
$807.9 million of total assets (before consolidation
entries) as at July 31, 2006. The Veritas Guarantors
generated, before consolidation entries, $112.5 million of
revenue, $15.2 million of operating income and
$20.4 million of net income in the three months ended
October 31, 2006 and held $781.3 million of total
assets (before consolidation entries) as at October 31,
2006.
In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization or
similar proceeding relating to us, our subsidiaries or our
respective properties, holders of the notes will participate
with our trade creditors and all other holders of our senior
unsecured indebtedness in the assets remaining. In any of these
cases, we may not have sufficient funds to pay all of our
creditors, and holders of the notes may receive less, ratably,
than the holders of secured debt.
As at September 30, 2006, on a pro forma basis for the merger
and the financing transactions, there would have been
947 million of
outstanding indebtedness, including accrued interest,
effectively senior to the notes, of which
926 million
would have been secured.
|
|
|
We will rely in part on our subsidiaries for funds
necessary to meet our financial obligations, including the
notes. |
We conduct a significant proportion of our activities through
our subsidiaries. We will depend in part on those subsidiaries
for dividends and other payments to generate the funds necessary
to meet our financial obligations, including the payment of
principal and interest on the notes. We cannot assure you that
the earnings from, or other available assets of, these operating
subsidiaries, together with our own operations, will be
sufficient to enable us to pay principal or interest on the
notes when due.
|
|
|
Although the occurrence of specific change of control
events affecting us will permit you to require us to repurchase
your notes, we may not be able to repurchase your notes. |
Upon the occurrence of specific change of control events
affecting us, you will have the right to require us to
repurchase your notes at 101% of their principal amount, plus
accrued and unpaid interest. Our ability to repurchase your
notes upon such a change of control event would be limited by
our access to funds at the time of the repurchase and the terms
of our debt agreements, which agreements could restrict or
prohibit such a repurchase. Upon a change of control event, we
may be required immediately to repay the outstanding principal,
any accrued interest on and any other amounts owed by us under
our senior facilities and our French revolving facility. The
source of funds for these repayments would be our available cash
or cash generated from other sources. However, we cannot assure
you that we will have sufficient funds available upon a change
of control to make these repayments and any required repurchases
of tendered notes.
|
|
|
Certain affiliates or associated entities of underwriters
participating in this offering will receive the net proceeds of
this offering, which may present a conflict of interest. |
We will use the proceeds from this offering to repay the loans
outstanding under the bridge loan facility. Affiliates of Credit
Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, BNP Paribas Securities
Corp., Calyon Securities (USA), Inc., Natexis Bleichroeder Inc.
and SG Americas Securities, LLC, the underwriters in this
offering, are lenders under the bridge loan facility, owning, as
of January 12, 2007, 45.6%, 7.2%, 2.5%, 7.2% and 6.3%,
respectively, of the loans outstanding under the bridge loan
facility. The proceeds from this offering, plus cash on hand,
will be used to repay in full the loans outstanding under the
bridge loan facility. See the information under the heading
titled Underwriting for a more detailed description
of these relationships.
The circumstances described above may present a conflict of
interest because certain of the underwriters participating in
this offering may have an interest in the successful completion
of this offering in addition to the underwriting discounts and
commissions they expect to receive. This offering is therefore
being made using a qualified independent underwriter
in compliance with Rule 2710(h) of the Conduct Rules of the
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., which is
intended to address potential conflicts of interest involving
31
underwriters. BNP Paribas Securities Corp. is assuming the
responsibilities of acting as the qualified independent
underwriter with respect to this offering. See the information
under the heading Underwriting for a more detailed
description of the independent underwriting procedures that are
being used in connection with this offering.
|
|
|
Insolvency laws in France may not be as favorable to you
as U.S. or other insolvency laws. |
We are incorporated under the laws of France. Consequently, we
and our French subsidiaries will be subject to French laws and
proceedings affecting creditors, including article 1244-1 of the
French Civil Code (Code civil), the conciliation
procedure (conciliation), the safeguard procedure
(procédure de sauvegarde) and insolvency
proceedings, which may be either judicial reorganization or
liquidation proceedings (redressement or liquidation
judiciaire).
Pursuant to article 1244-1 of the French Civil Code, French
courts may, in any civil proceeding involving the debtor,
whether initiated by the debtor or a creditor, taking into
account the debtors financial position and the
creditors financial needs, defer or otherwise reschedule
over a maximum period of two years the payment dates of payment
obligations. In addition, if a debtor specifically initiates
proceedings therefor, French courts may decide that any amounts
the payment date of which is thus deferred or rescheduled, will
bear interest at a rate which is lower than the contractual rate
(but not lower than the legal rate) and that payments made shall
first be allocated to repayment of principal. If a court order
under article 1244-1 is made, it will suspend any pending
enforcement measures, and any contractual interest or penalty
for late payment will not accrue or be due during the period
ordered by the court.
A company may initiate, in its sole discretion a conciliation
procedure (conciliation) with respect to itself whereby
it tries to reach a judicial amicable settlement of its debts,
provided it (i) has not become unable to pay its debts as
they come due out of its available assets (cessation de
paiements) for more than 45 days and
(ii) experiences legal, economic or financial difficulties.
At the request of the company, the court will enter an order
appointing a conciliator (conciliateur) to help the
company reach an agreement with its creditors for reducing or
rescheduling its indebtedness. Certain conditions must be
satisfied for the agreement to be approved by the court, and in
particular, it must permit the survival of the company as a
going concern. The court may impose, pursuant to article 1244-1
of the French Civil Code, debt deferrals on creditors which,
during the course of the conciliation procedure, take any action
against the company for the payment of their claims.
A company may initiate, in its sole discretion, a safeguard
procedure (procédure de sauvegarde) with respect to
itself, provided it (i) has not become unable to pay its
debts as they come due out of its available assets and
(ii) experiences difficulties, which it is not able to
overcome, which may cause the company to become unable to pay
its debts. From the time of the court order initiating the
safeguard procedure until the end of an observation period,
which may last for up to 18 months in exceptional cases,
the company is prohibited from paying any prior debts and its
creditors are barred from pursuing any legal proceedings against
it to (i) obtain the payment of such debts,
(ii) terminate an agreement with the company or
(iii) seize or attach any of its assets. The purpose of the
observation period is to determine whether a safeguard plan can
be adopted. This plan (which can provide for debt deferrals or
write-offs) may be negotiated with two separate creditors
committees, one comprising the main suppliers of the company and
the other comprising its credit institutions. Each committee
votes on the plan with a majority in number of the creditors
representing at least two thirds of the claims of the committee
members. If the committees reject the plan, and for creditors
who are not members of the committees, the court may impose debt
deferrals of up to ten years, with minimum installments of 5% of
the total amount of the companys liabilities. The current
applicable legislation does not provide for the inclusion of
noteholders in the membership of any committee, thus they must
be consulted separately.
A companys directors are required to petition for
insolvency proceedings within 45 days of becoming unable to
pay its debts as they come due. A companys creditors, the
relevant commercial court or the public prosecutor may also file
a petition for insolvency proceedings if the company becomes
unable to pay its debts as they come due. The date on which the
debtor became unable to pay its debts as they came due (i.e.,
the date of suspension of payments (date de cessation des
paiements)), is deemed to be the date of the court order
commencing insolvency proceedings (jugement
douverture). However, in this order or in a subsequent
order, a
32
court may set the date of suspension of payments at an earlier
date of up to 18 months prior to the court order commencing
proceedings (but in any event at no earlier date than the date
on which the court approved any prior conciliation agreement).
If the proceedings are judicial reorganization proceedings, an
administrator appointed by the court investigates the affairs of
the debtor during an initial observation period (période
dobservation) and makes proposals for the
debtors reorganization, sale or liquidation. The court can
order the liquidation of the debtor at any time during the
observation period. There is no observation period if the court
directly opens judicial liquidation proceedings against the
debtor. The outcome of the proceedings is decided by the court
without a vote of the creditors. During the observation period,
a reorganization plan may be negotiated and adopted by two
creditors committees under the same principles as those
applicable to the safeguard procedure described above. A court
may also impose debt deferrals of up to ten years, with minimum
installments of 5% of the total amount of the companys
liabilities.
The importance of the date of suspension of payments is that it
marks the beginning of the suspect period (période
suspecte). Certain transactions made during the suspect
period may be void or voidable. Void transactions include
transactions or payments entered into during the suspect period
that constitute voluntary preferences for the benefit of certain
creditors to the detriment of other creditors. These include
transfers of assets for no or nominal consideration (à
titre gratuit), contracts under which the reciprocal
obligations of the debtor significantly exceed those of the
other party, payments on debts not due at the time of payment,
payments of matured debts otherwise than through recognized
means of payment (e.g., checks, promissory notes, cash),
security granted for debts previously incurred, provisional
measures unless the writ of attachment or seizure predates the
date of suspension of payments. Voidable transactions include
transfers of assets for no or nominal consideration (à
titre gratuit) within six months prior to the commencement
of the suspect period and include transactions entered into, or
payments made when due, after the date of suspension of payments
if the party dealing with the debtor knew or should have known
that it had suspended payment of its debts.
As a general rule, creditors domiciled in France whose debts
arose prior to the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings,
including safeguard procedures or judicial reorganizations, must
file a claim with the creditors representative within two
months of the publication of the court order in the
Bulletin Officiel des Annonces Civiles et
Commerciales. This period is extended to four months for
creditors domiciled outside France. Creditors who have not
submitted their claims during this period are barred from
receiving distributions made in connection with the bankruptcy
proceedings. Employees are not subject to such limitations.
Contractual provisions to the effect that termination of
agreements with, or the acceleration of the payment obligations
of, a company which result from:
|
|
|
|
|
the opening of judicial reorganization or safeguard proceedings
against such company, or |
|
|
|
the existence of the state of suspension of payments (i.e., the
inability to pay due debts out of available assets) against such
company |
shall not be enforceable.
An administrator may continue or not continue executory
contracts. If the administrator elects to continue a contract,
the administrator must ensure that the debtor fully performs its
post-petition contractual obligations.
If the court adopts a judicial reorganization or safeguard plan,
it can prohibit for a period of time the sale of an asset that
it deems to be essential to the continued business of the debtor.
In general, French insolvency legislation favors the
continuation of a business and protection of employment over the
payment of creditors. It assigns priority to the payment of
certain creditors, including the employees, judicial expenses
and post-petition creditors.
|
|
|
Courts, under certain circumstances, may void the
guarantees of the notes provided by certain of our
subsidiaries. |
Our creditors or the creditors of one or more guarantors of the
notes or a liquidator, administrator or other controller
appointed to a guarantor could challenge the guarantees as
fraudulent transfers, conveyances, preferences, insolvent
transactions or uncommercial transactions or on other grounds
(including because of the
33
absence of a corporate benefit to the guarantor or due to
financial assistance principles) under applicable
U.S. federal or state law, applicable Canadian federal or
provincial law, applicable Australian law, applicable Norwegian
law or the applicable law governing the country of incorporation
of any future guarantors. While the relevant laws vary from one
jurisdiction to another, the entering into the guarantees by
certain of our subsidiaries could be found to be a fraudulent
transfer, conveyance, preference, insolvent transaction or
uncommercial transaction or otherwise void or unenforceable if a
court were to determine that, for example, one or more of the
following apply to the provision of the guarantee:
|
|
|
|
|
a guarantor delivered its guarantee with the intent to defeat,
hinder, delay, defraud or otherwise interfere with its existing
or future creditors; |
|
|
|
the guarantor did not receive fair consideration or benefit for
the delivery of the guarantee and the guarantor was insolvent at
the time it delivered the guarantee; |
|
|
|
the guarantor delivered its guarantee in contravention of laws
relating to the provision of financial assistance; |
|
|
|
the guarantor was insolvent at the time of execution of the
guarantee or was rendered insolvent by reason of its execution
of the guarantee or the observance of its obligations under the
guarantee; |
|
|
|
a reasonable person in the guarantors circumstances would
not have entered into the transaction having regard to the
benefits (if any) to the guarantor, the detriment to the
guarantor and the respective benefits to other parties; |
|
|
|
the guarantor was engaged, or was about to engage, in a business
or transaction for which its remaining assets constituted
unreasonably small capital to carry on its business; |
|
|
|
the guarantor intended to incur, or believed it would incur,
debts beyond its ability to pay the debts as they matured; |
|
|
|
the guarantor was a defendant in an action for money damage, or
had a judgment for money damages docketed against it (if, in
either case, after final judgment, the judgment is
unsatisfied); or |
|
|
|
the availability of certain equitable remedies that are in the
discretion of the courts. |
To the extent a court voids a guarantee as a fraudulent
transfer, preference, insolvent transaction or uncommercial
transaction or conveyance or holds it unenforceable for any
other reason, holders of notes would cease to have any direct
claim against the guarantor that delivered the guarantee. If a
court were to take this action, the guarantors assets
would, in certain jurisdictions, be applied first to satisfy the
guarantors liabilities, including trade payables and
preferred stock claims, if any, before any portion of its assets
could be distributed to us to be applied to the payment of the
notes. We cannot assure you that a guarantors remaining
assets would be sufficient to satisfy the claims of the holders
of notes relating to any voided portions of the guarantees. In
other jurisdictions (such as Australia), if a guarantee is so
voided or held unenforceable, you will cease to have any claim
against the guarantor.
|
|
|
Judgments of U.S. courts may not be enforceable
against CGGVeritas. |
Judgments of U.S. courts, including those predicated on the
civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the
United States, may not be enforceable in French courts. As a
result, shareholders who obtain a judgment against CGGVeritas in
the United States may not be able to require it to pay the
amount of the judgment.
|
|
|
A trading market for the new notes may not develop and a
trading market for the notes may not continue to exist. |
There has not been an established trading market for the new
notes. Although the underwriters have informed us that they
currently intend to make a market in the new notes offered
hereby, they have no obligation to do so and may discontinue
making a market at any time without notice.
34
The liquidity of any market for either the new notes or the
additional notes will depend upon the number of holders of such
notes, our performance, the market for similar securities, the
interest of securities dealers in making a market in such notes
and other factors, including general declines or disruptions in
the markets for debt securities. Although we have applied to
admit the notes to listing on the Official List of the
Luxembourg Stock Exchange and to trading on the Euro MTF, a
liquid trading market may not develop or continue to exist for
the notes.
In addition, the notes may trade at prices that are lower than
their initial purchase price.
There is a possibility that the additional notes may not
be fungible with the existing notes.
In the event that the additional notes are issued with more than
a de minimis amount of original issue discount
(OID), the additional notes will be issued with a
separate CUSIP number and will likely be treated as a separate
series for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In such a
case, an investment in the additional notes will likely be
considerably less liquid and a trading market may not develop or
exist at all with respect to the additional notes. In addition,
in such a case, the additional notes will be considered to have
been issued with OID and the treatment under
Taxation United States Federal Tax
Considerations Original Issue Discount would
apply. See Taxation United States Federal Tax
Considerations for further information.
35
EXCHANGE RATES
The following table sets forth, for the periods and dates
indicated, certain information concerning the exchange rates for
the euro expressed in U.S. dollars per euro. Information
concerning the U.S. dollar exchange rate is based on the
noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign
currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York (the Noon Buying Rate).
Such rates are provided solely for convenience and no
representation is made that euro were, could have been, or could
be, converted into U.S. dollars at these rates or at any
other rate. Such rates were not used by us in the preparation of
our audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The Noon Buying Rate on
January 26, 2007 was $1.2909 per euro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars per euro exchange rate | |
|
|
| |
Year ended December 31, |
|
Period-end | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Average(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2002
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
2003
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
2004
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
2005
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
Year ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
2003
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
2004
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
2005
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
Three months ended October 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
Month |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
August 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
September 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
October 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
November 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
January 2007 (through January 26)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
|
|
(1) |
The annual average rate is the average of the Noon Buying Rates
on the last business day of each month. |
36
USE OF PROCEEDS
We expect the net proceeds to be received by us from the
offering, net of underwriting commissions and discounts and
other expenses, to be approximately $590 million. We intend
to use the net proceeds from this offering plus cash on hand to
repay in full the $700 million outstanding under the bridge
loan facility used to finance a portion of the cash
consideration paid in the merger. The merger was completed on
January 12, 2007. The total purchase price that we paid for
the acquisition of Veritas was $1.5 billion in cash and
46.1 million CGG ADSs. The bridge loan facility matures on
the date that is 18 months from the effective date of the
merger, subject to a six-month extension at our option.
Borrowings under the bridge loan facility bear an interest rate
based on LIBOR plus an interest rate margin which varies
depending on the credit rating of the bridge loan facility. With
respect to the first interest period, the effective interest
rate on the bridge loan facility is LIBOR plus 4.10%. For
further details of the bridge loan facility, the repayment of
the bridge loan facility and the merger see Description of
Certain Indebtedness Bridge
Loan Facility, The Veritas Merger and
Underwriting.
37
CAPITALIZATION
The following table shows our cash and cash equivalents, total
financial debt and total capitalization as at September 30,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
on an historical CGG basis; and |
|
|
|
as adjusted to reflect the merger and the financing transactions. |
The historical information has been derived from the unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements of CGG included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The information set out below
should be read in conjunction with The Veritas
Merger, Use of Proceeds and Description
of Certain Indebtedness, the unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus and the unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial information included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited pro forma
capitalization has been prepared for illustrative purposes only
and, because of its nature, may not give a true picture of our
capitalization. Other than as described below, there has been no
material change in our consolidated capitalization since
September 30, 2006.
The exchange rate used to translate U.S. dollar amounts to
euros (U.S.$1.2660 per
1.00) in the
following table is the rate used by CGG to prepare its financial
statements as at September 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Other Pro | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
CGG | |
|
Veritas | |
|
|
|
for the | |
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
Actual | |
|
|
|
Merger and | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
October 31, | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
the | |
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
Consistency | |
|
Financing | |
|
As | |
|
|
(IFRS) | |
|
(U.S. GAAP) | |
|
Adjustments(1) | |
|
Transactions | |
|
Adjusted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(148 |
)(2) |
|
|
301 |
|
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Current portion of financial debt
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
Capital lease (current portion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Other financial debt (current including accrued interest)
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Veritas convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
)(3) |
|
|
15 |
|
Financial debt
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
Capital lease
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Other financial debt (including accrued interest)
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
Senior facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
778 |
(4) |
|
|
778 |
|
|
Senior notes due 2015
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
(5) |
|
|
488 |
|
|
Senior notes due 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
(5) |
|
|
233 |
|
Total financial debt (including bank overdrafts)
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
968 |
(6) |
|
|
2,406 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Total shareholders equity and minority interests
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
Net debt/(Cash)
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
|
|
1,402 |
|
Note:
|
|
(1) |
Adjustments to Veritas consolidated balance sheet as at
October 31, 2006 have been made to ensure consistency of
accounting principles with CGG under IFRS. See Notes 2 and
3 to our unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
38
|
|
(2) |
Net effect of pro forma adjustment on cash as described in
Note 4.2.5 to our unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
(3) |
See discussion in Note 4.1.1.1 to our unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. |
|
(4) |
Net proceeds of $1.0 billion from the term loan facility. |
|
(5) |
The assumed net proceeds of the offering of the notes hereby. |
|
(6) |
Reflects the net impact of the shares issued as consideration in
connection with the merger. |
39
THE VERITAS MERGER
On September 4, 2006, Veritas DGC Inc., a Delaware
corporation, and CGG, entered into the merger agreement, by and
among Veritas, CGG, Volnay Acquisition Co. I, a Delaware
corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of CGG, and Volnay
Acquisition Co. II, a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
subsidiary of CGG, under which CGG agreed to acquire all of the
issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, of Veritas. On January 12, 2007,
pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, as approved by
the Boards of Directors of both Veritas and CGG and the
shareholders of Veritas, Volnay Acquisition Co. I merged with
and into Veritas with Veritas continuing as the surviving
corporation, and immediately thereafter, Veritas merged with and
into Volnay Acquisition Co. II with Volnay Acquisition
Co. II continuing as the surviving corporation as a wholly
owned subsidiary of CGG. Upon effectiveness of the merger,
Volnay Acquisition Co. II changed its name to
CGGVeritas Services Inc.
The stockholders of Veritas received, in the aggregate,
consideration comprised of $1.5 billion in cash and
46.1 million ADSs of CGG, with each ADS representing
one-fifth of an ordinary share, nominal value
2.00 per
share, of CGG. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement,
stockholders of Veritas had the right to elect to receive cash
or ADSs, subject to a proration if either cash or stock was
oversubscribed. The final consideration per share of Veritas
common stock was $85.50 in cash or 2.0097 CGG ADS.
The merger remains subject to
post-completion
clearance by competition authorities in the United Kingdom
and Brazil. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of these
reviews, but we do not expect them to have a material
impact on our operations.
We believe a number of strategic factors support the merger,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the combination of CGG and Veritas took place in a strong
business environment. Decreasing reserves of oil and gas
companies have been coupled with growing energy consumption
sustained by long-term demand, particularly in China and India.
This environment has created a need to accelerate the pace of
exploration in new areas, to revisit existing exploration areas
with new technologies and to optimize reservoir management to
maximize recovery rates. Seismic technology plays a key role in
this process and CGGVeritas, with its combined technology and
worldwide geographic fit, is expected to be well positioned to
compete to lead and meet the industrys needs; |
|
|
|
the combination of CGG and Veritas creates a strong global
pure-play seismic company, offering a broad range of seismic
services, and, through Sercel, geophysical equipment to the
industry across all markets. The business, geographic and client
complementarities of CGG and Veritas are expected to respond to
the growing demand for seismic imaging and reservoir solutions.
CGGVeritas is expected to be well positioned to provide an
improved technological advanced product offering in seismic
services as most oil and gas companies attempt to replace
diminishing reserves in a more complex exploration environment,
to strengthen long-term relationships with a broad range of
clients and to improve financial performance through business
cycles; |
|
|
|
the combination of CGG and Veritas brings together two companies
with strong technological foundations in the geophysical
services and equipment market. Both CGG and Veritas have a long
tradition in providing seismic services both onshore and
offshore. In particular, Veritas strong offshore positions
will effectively complete the repositioning to offshore that CGG
has been implementing during the last few years. Both companies
already use a broad range of Sercel technologies for their data
acquisition activities, thereby providing a homogeneous
equipment base for the combined CGGVeritas. In addition,
Veritas strong focus on North America fits well with
CGGs international presence. Combining the two customer
bases is expected to provide a good balance between national oil
companies (a strong position of CGG), major oil and gas
operators (a strong position of both CGG and Veritas) and
U.S.-based operators,
both majors and independent (a strong position of Veritas). The |
40
|
|
|
|
|
combined technology and know-how of the two companies will
strengthen research and development capabilities to best serve
the CGGVeritas client base with a broader range of technologies
that CGGVeritas would be able to deliver more rapidly to the
market; |
|
|
|
the addition of Veritas fleet of seven vessels creates a
combined seismic services business operating the worlds
leading seismic fleet of 20 vessels, including 14 high
capacity 3D vessels. Capacity in the combined fleet is well
balanced between large (more than 10 streamers), medium (six to
eight streamers) and smaller sizes, with all vessels equipped
with Sercels solid or fluid streamers. The combined fleet
will provide highly flexible fleet management potential with a
balanced distribution of fully owned, chartered, new built and
significantly depreciated capacity. Additionally, most of the
vessels in the combined fleet have been recently equipped with
relatively new technology which will provide CGGVeritas with a
fleet that can be managed without significant investments in the
near term; |
|
|
|
offshore multi-client services benefits from two complementary,
recent vintage, well-positioned seismic data libraries. For
example, the Veritas library will bring to CGG complementary
data in the Gulf of Mexico, with Veritas data library being
positioned in the Western and Central Gulf while CGGs data
library is in the Central and Eastern Gulf. Data merging from
the CGG and Veritas libraries will provide potential for cross
imaging enhancement and value creation. All these benefits take
place in a market where a global library portfolio is
increasingly attractive to clients; |
|
|
|
CGGs and Veritas respective offerings for land
acquisition services represent strong geographical and
technological complementarities for high-end positioning and
further development of local partnerships. Veritas strong
presence in the western hemisphere, in particular North America
and particularly in multi-client surveys, complements CGGs
main geographic footprint in the eastern hemisphere and its
strong focus on the Middle East. In addition, CGGs and
Veritas technological complementarities will enhance
CGGVeritas land offering, ranging from exploration seismic
to field seismic monitoring; |
|
|
|
CGGs and Veritas respective positions in data
processing and imaging as well as the skills and reputation of
their experts and geoscientists, allows CGGVeritas to create the
industry reference in this segment, with particular strengths in
advanced technologies such as depth imaging, 4D processing and
reservoir characterization as well as a close link with clients
through dedicated centers; |
|
|
|
the merger will not affect Sercels open technology
approach. Sercel will pursue its strategy of maintaining leading
edge technology, offering new generations of differentiating
products and focusing on key markets; and |
|
|
|
with a combined workforce of 7,000 staff operating
worldwide, including Sercel, CGGVeritas will, through continued
innovation, be an industry leader in seismic technology,
services and equipment with a broad base of customers including
independent, international and national oil companies. |
See Risk Factors Risks Related to Our
Business We are subject to certain risks related to
acquisitions, including the merger, and these risks may
materially adversely affect our revenues, expenses, operating
results and financial condition.
41
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING
INFORMATION OF CGG
In accordance with regulations adopted by the European Union in
July 2002, all companies incorporated under the laws of one of
the member states of the European Union and whose securities are
publicly traded within the European Union were required to
prepare their consolidated financial statements for the fiscal
year starting on or after January 1, 2005, on the basis of
accounting standards issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board. Therefore, in accordance with these
requirements, CGG converted from using French generally accepted
accounting principles to IFRS, as adopted by the European Union.
As a first-time adopter of IFRS at January 1, 2005, CGG has
followed the specific requirements described in IFRS 1,
First Time Adoption of IFRS. The options selected for the
purpose of the transition to IFRS are described in the notes to
CGGs audited consolidated financial statements, included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Effects of the transition on the
balance sheet at January 1, 2004, the statement of income
for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the balance sheet
at December 31, 2004 are presented and discussed in
Note 30 to CGGs 2005 audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The tables below set forth CGGs selected historical
consolidated financial and operating information:
|
|
|
|
|
as at and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005 in accordance with both IFRS and U.S. GAAP; |
|
|
|
as at and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 in
accordance with IFRS; and |
|
|
|
as at and for each of the five years in the period ending
December 31, 2005 in accordance with U.S. GAAP. |
The following selected historical consolidated financial
information as at and for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004 is derived from CGGs consolidated audited
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
CGGs consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 have been audited by Barbier
Frinault & Autres Ernst & Young and
Mazars & Guérard. The following selected
historical consolidated financial information for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 is unaudited and
is derived from CGGs unaudited financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited financial
statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring accruals, which CGG considers necessary for a fair
presentation of its financial position and results of operations
for these periods. The results of operations for the nine-month
periods presented below are not necessarily indicative of the
results for the full fiscal year.
The tables should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified
in their entirety by reference to, CGGs consolidated
financial statements and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations CGG Results of Operations included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
42
IFRS differs from U.S. GAAP in certain significant
respects. For a discussion of significant differences between
U.S. GAAP and IFRS as they relate to CGGs
consolidated financial statements and a reconciliation to
U.S. GAAP of CGGs net income and shareholders
equity for 2005 and 2004, see Note 31 to CGGs audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus and Note 3 to CGGs unaudited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at and for the nine | |
|
|
|
|
months ended | |
|
As at and for the | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
year ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except for | |
|
|
per share and ratio data) | |
Amounts in accordance with IFRS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
607.5 |
|
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
687.4 |
|
Other revenues from ordinary activities
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(636.7 |
) |
|
|
(473.2 |
) |
|
|
(670.0 |
) |
|
|
(554.0 |
) |
Gross profit
|
|
|
320.3 |
|
|
|
135.5 |
|
|
|
201.8 |
|
|
|
133.8 |
|
Research and development expenses, net
|
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(86.9 |
|
|
|
(64.2 |
) |
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
(78.6 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses)
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
19.3 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
217.6 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
Cost of financial debt, net
|
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
|
|
(42.3 |
) |
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
Derivative and other expenses on convertible bonds
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(38.0 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
Other financial income (loss)
|
|
|
(8.4 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(54.9 |
) |
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
121.0 |
|
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
Attributable to minority interests
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(1)
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
(2.37 |
) |
|
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
Diluted(2)
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
|
|
(2.37 |
) |
|
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
Other Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(3)
|
|
|
10.9 |
x |
|
|
1.7 |
x |
|
|
1.4 |
x |
|
|
1.8 |
x |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
Working
capital(4)
|
|
|
254.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154.1 |
|
|
|
116.4 |
|
Property, plant & equipment, net
|
|
|
485.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480.1 |
|
|
|
204.1 |
|
Multi-client surveys
|
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.6 |
|
|
|
124.5 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,751.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,565.1 |
|
|
|
971.2 |
|
Financial
debt(5)
|
|
|
430.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400.3 |
|
|
|
249.6 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
850.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
|
|
393.2 |
|
|
Other Historical Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORBDA(6)
|
|
|
359.9 |
|
|
|
148.9 |
|
|
|
229.5 |
|
|
|
172.5 |
|
Capital expenditures (property, plant &
equipment)(7)
|
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
75.4 |
|
|
|
125.1 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
|
Capital expenditures for multi-client surveys
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
Net
debt(8)
|
|
|
273.0 |
|
|
|
500.5 |
|
|
|
297.2 |
|
|
|
121.8 |
|
Net
debt(8)/
ORBDA(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
x |
|
|
0.7x |
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at and for the nine | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As at and for the year ended December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except for per share, ratio and operational data) | |
Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
967.7 |
|
|
|
601.6 |
|
|
|
860.8 |
|
|
|
709.5 |
|
|
|
645.6 |
|
|
|
719.0 |
|
|
|
795.0 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
215.0 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
81.9 |
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic common stock
holder(1)
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
(1.30 |
) |
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
Diluted common stock
holder(9)
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
(1.30 |
) |
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
Other Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(3)
|
|
|
8.8 |
x |
|
|
2.0 |
x |
|
|
1.6 |
x |
|
|
1.4 |
x |
|
|
0.5 |
x |
|
|
2.2 |
x |
|
|
2.0 |
x |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,751.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,573.8 |
|
|
|
975.8 |
|
|
|
924.2 |
|
|
|
1,036.8 |
|
|
|
1,008.0 |
|
Financial
debt(5)
|
|
|
436.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416.7 |
|
|
|
266.5 |
|
|
|
232.4 |
|
|
|
307.8 |
|
|
|
279.5 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
811.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689.5 |
|
|
|
372.2 |
|
|
|
413.4 |
|
|
|
431.0 |
|
|
|
456.4 |
|
|
Operational Data (end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land teams in operations
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Operational
streamers(10)
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Data processing centers
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Notes:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Basic per share amounts under IFRS and U.S. GAAP have been
calculated on the basis of 17,318,957 issued and
outstanding shares in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006, 11,765,118 issued and outstanding
shares in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005,
12,095,925 issued and outstanding shares in 2005 and 11,681,406
issued and outstanding shares in 2004. Basic per share amounts
under U.S. GAAP have been calculated on the basis of
11,680,718 issued and outstanding shares in 2003 and 2002 and
11,609,393 issued and outstanding shares in 2001. |
|
(2) |
|
Diluted per share amount under IFRS has been calculated on the
basis of 17,675,616 issued and outstanding shares in the
nine month period ended September 30, 2006,
13,451,097 issued and outstanding shares in the nine month
period ended September 30, 2005, 12,095,925 issued and
outstanding shares in 2005 and 11,681,406 issued and outstanding
shares in 2004. For the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2005, the effect of convertible bonds was
anti-dilutive. |
|
(3) |
|
For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed
charges, earnings in IFRS consist of income (loss) from
consolidated companies before income taxes, excluding derivative
and other expenses on convertible bonds included in CGGs
income statement for the relevant period included elsewhere in
this prospectus. Earnings under U.S. GAAP consist of income
from consolidated companies before income taxes and minority
interests, excluding equity in income of affiliates included in
CGGs income statement for the relevant period included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Fixed charges under each of IFRS
and U.S. GAAP consist of net cost of financial debt
(including amortization fees). For the year ended
December 31, 2003, our earnings were insufficient to cover
fixed charges by
13.5 million
under U.S. GAAP. |
|
(4) |
|
Working capital consists of trade accounts and notes receivable,
inventories and
work-in-progress, tax
assets, other current assets and assets held for sale less trade
accounts and notes payable, accrued payroll costs, income tax
payable, advance billings to customers, current provisions and
other current liabilities. |
|
(5) |
|
Financial debt means total financial debt, including
current maturities, capital leases and accrued interest but
excluding bank overdrafts. |
|
(6) |
|
A discussion of ORBDA (Operating Result Before
Depreciation and Amortization, previously denominated
Adjusted EBITDA), including (i) a
reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities and
(ii) the reasons why our management believes that a
presentation of ORBDA provides useful information to investors
regarding our financial condition and results of operations, is
found in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources ORBDA. |
|
(7) |
|
Capital expenditures is defined as purchases of
property, plant and equipment plus equipment acquired under
capital lease. |
44
|
|
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of capital
expenditures to purchases of property, plant and equipment and
equipment acquired under capital lease for the periods indicated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months | |
|
For the year | |
|
|
ended September 30, | |
|
ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
117.0 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
Equipment acquired under capital lease
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
75.4 |
|
|
|
125.1 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Net debt means bank overdrafts, financial debt
including current portion (including capital lease debt) net of
cash and cash equivalents. A discussion of net debt, including
(i) a reconciliation of net debt to financing items of the
CGG balance sheet and (ii) the reasons why our management
believes that a presentation of net debt provides useful
information to investors regarding our financial condition and
results of operations, is found in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Net Debt. |
|
(9) |
|
Diluted per share amounts under U.S. GAAP have been
calculated on the basis of 17,675,616 issued and
outstanding shares in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006, 13,451,097 issued and outstanding
shares in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005,
12,378,209 issued and outstanding shares in 2005, 11,681,406
issued and outstanding shares in 2004, 11,760,630 issued and
outstanding shares in 2003, 11,680,718 issued and outstanding
shares in 2002 and 11,609,393 issued and outstanding shares in
2001. In 2002 and 2001, the effects of stock options were not
dilutive (as a result of applying the treasury stock method). |
|
(10) |
|
Data includes Exploration Resources ASAs streamers (from
and including December 31, 2005) and excludes streamers of
vessels in transit or dry-dock. |
45
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF VERITAS
The table below sets forth selected historical consolidated
financial data for Veritas as at and for the three months ended
October 31, 2006 and 2005 and as at and for each of the
five years in the period ending July 31, 2006, in each case
in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The following selected historical consolidated financial
information as at and for the years ended July 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 is derived from Veritas consolidated annual
financial statements under U.S. GAAP included elsewhere in
this prospectus. Veritas consolidated financial statements
as at and for the year ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The
following selected historical consolidated information for the
three-month periods
ended October 31, 2006 and 2005 is unaudited and is derived
from Veritas unaudited financial statements included
elsewhere in the prospectus. The unaudited financial statements
include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
accruals, which Veritas considers necessary for a fair
presentation of its financial position and results of operations
for these periods. The results of operations for the
three-month periods
presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results
for the full fiscal year.
The table below should be read in conjunction with, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the consolidated
financial statements of Veritas and its subsidiaries and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Veritas Results
of Operations included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at and for the three | |
|
|
|
|
months ended October 31, | |
|
As at and for the year ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
2006(1) | |
|
2005(2) | |
|
2004(3) | |
|
2003(4) | |
|
2002(5) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions, except per share amount) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
230.8 |
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
822.2 |
|
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
564.5 |
|
|
|
501.8 |
|
|
|
452.2 |
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
165.8 |
|
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
623.2 |
|
|
|
519.0 |
|
|
|
495.7 |
|
|
|
423.2 |
|
|
|
347.9 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(.83 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(.96 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(.13 |
) |
|
|
.12 |
|
|
|
(.88 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income tax expense
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
82.2 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
(59.1 |
) |
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
Net income (loss) per common share basic
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
(1.77 |
) |
|
|
(.74 |
) |
Net income (loss) per common share diluted
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
(1.77 |
) |
|
|
(.74 |
) |
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
353.8 |
|
|
|
228.0 |
|
|
|
402.0 |
|
|
|
249.4 |
|
|
|
116.3 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
141.9 |
|
|
|
128.8 |
|
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
|
127.9 |
|
|
|
121.7 |
|
|
|
149.7 |
|
|
|
189.8 |
|
Multi-client data library
|
|
|
324.1 |
|
|
|
333.3 |
|
|
|
296.6 |
|
|
|
316.8 |
|
|
|
313.2 |
|
|
|
373.1 |
|
|
|
338.8 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,175.6 |
|
|
|
954.5 |
|
|
|
1,158.0 |
|
|
|
966.6 |
|
|
|
776.2 |
|
|
|
790.9 |
|
|
|
781.4 |
|
Long-term debt (including current maturities)
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
194.2 |
|
|
|
140.0 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
749.8 |
|
|
|
607.8 |
|
|
|
710.5 |
|
|
|
582.5 |
|
|
|
489.7 |
|
|
|
487.5 |
|
|
|
520.7 |
|
Other Historical Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORBDA(6)
|
|
|
123.5 |
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
383.7 |
|
|
|
265.9 |
|
|
|
278.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
Notes:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a gain on involuntary conversion of assets of
$2.0 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes a gain on involuntary conversion of assets of
$9.9 million and a release of deferred tax valuation
allowances of $36.9 million. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes charges of $22.1 million related to a change in
multi-client accounting policies and $7.4 million related
to debt refinancing. The change in multi-client accounting
policies may affect the comparability between periods and is
more fully described in Note 1 to the Veritas audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes charges of $39.3 million for goodwill impairment,
$4.9 million for impairment of a multi-client survey,
$7.6 million loss related to the sale of Veritas
(RC)2
software operations and $21.0 million related to deferred
tax asset valuation allowances. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes charges of $55.3 million for impairment of
multi-client surveys, $14.6 million for costs of a
terminated merger and $6.5 million valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets. |
|
(6) |
|
A discussion of ORBDA (Operating Result Before
Depreciation and Amortization, previously denominated
Adjusted EBITDA), including (i) a
reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities and
(ii) the reasons why our management believes that a
presentation of ORBDA provides useful information to investors
regarding our financial condition and results of operations, is
found in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources ORBDA. |
47
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information is presented in millions of euros and gives pro
forma effect to the merger and the financing transactions under
IFRS and U.S. GAAP as if they occurred on January 1,
2005 in the case of the pro forma statements of income, and
September 30, 2006, in the case of the pro forma balance
sheet. The pro forma condensed combined statements of income
give pro forma effect to the acquisition of Exploration
Resources and the related financings as if they occurred on
January 1, 2005. The merger and the acquisition of
Exploration Resources are reflected in the pro forma financial
statements using the purchase method of accounting under U.S.
GAAP and IFRS.
The unaudited pro forma adjustments reflect the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
under U.S. GAAP, the price of CGG ADSs was $32.44, the
average price of CGG ADSs for the period beginning two days
before and ending two days after September 5, 2006 (the
date that the merger was announced); |
|
|
|
under IFRS, the price of CGG ADSs was $40.50, the closing
price on the closing date of the merger; |
|
|
|
each outstanding share of Veritas common stock was converted in
the merger into the right to receive either (i) 2.25 CGG
ADSs (with respect to 50.664% of Veritas total common
stock) or (ii) $75.00 in cash (with respect to 49.336% of
Veritas total common stock); |
|
|
|
the cash consideration paid by CGG in connection with the merger
was financed by a $1.0 billion term loan facility, the
issuance of $600 million in notes offered hereby and cash
on hand; and |
|
|
|
each employee option to purchase shares of Veritas common stock
pursuant to any stock option plan, program or arrangement of
Veritas outstanding at the time of the merger, whether or not
vested, has been cancelled and converted into the right to
receive, for each share of Veritas common stock subject to such
option, an amount in cash equal to the excess, if any, of $75.00
over the exercise price per share under such option (less any
applicable withholding taxes). |
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is
not indicative of the results of operations or the financial
condition of CGGVeritas that would have been achieved had the
merger, the acquisition of Exploration Resources, and the
related financing transactions been completed as of the dates
indicated, nor is the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information indicative of our future results of
operations or financial position. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial information does not reflect any
cost savings or other synergies that may result from the merger
nor does it reflect any special items such as restructuring and
integration costs that may be incurred as a result of the merger.
CGGVeritas reports, and CGG reported, its financial results in
euros and in conformity with IFRS, with a reconciliation to
U.S. GAAP. Veritas reported its financial results in
U.S. dollars and in conformity with U.S. GAAP. IFRS
differs from U.S. GAAP in certain significant respects. For
a discussion of significant differences between U.S. GAAP
and IFRS as they relate to CGGs consolidated financial
statements and a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of CGGs
net income and shareholders equity for 2005 and 2004, see
Note 31 to CGGs audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and Note 3
to CGGs unaudited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. For an explanation of the
differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they apply to
CGGs and Veritas historical accounting treatments,
see Note 2 to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the
respective consolidated financial statements of CGG for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and as at and for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2006 and the consolidated
financial statements of Veritas for the year ended July 31,
2006, and the consolidated financial statements of Veritas as at
and for the three-month period ended October 31, 2006, all
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
48
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
is based on preliminary estimates and assumptions, which we
believe to be reasonable. In the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial information, the cash to be paid
and CGG ADSs to be issued as merger consideration for
Veritas shares of common stock have been allocated to the
Veritas assets and liabilities based upon preliminary estimates
by the management of CGG of their respective fair values at the
date of the merger. Any difference between the consideration
paid and the fair value of the Veritas assets and liabilities
has been recorded as goodwill. Definitive allocations will be
performed after the effective time of the merger. Accordingly,
the pro forma adjustments relating to the purchase price
allocation are preliminary, have been made solely for the
purpose of preparing the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information and are subject to revision based on the
final determination of fair value after the effective time of
the merger. Any such revisions may be material.
49
CGGVERITAS UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2005 UNDER IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration | |
|
|
|
|
|
pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources | |
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments for the | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
|
and related | |
|
|
|
|
|
merger and the | |
|
pro forma | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
pro forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
financing | |
|
income | |
|
|
CGG 12 | |
|
adjustments | |
|
Veritas 12 | |
|
adjustments | |
|
transactions | |
|
statement 12 | |
|
|
months | |
|
8 months | |
|
months | |
|
12 months | |
|
12 months | |
|
months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
August 31, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
IFRS | |
|
IFRS | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
IFRS | |
|
IFRS | |
|
IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Note 1 | |
|
Note 1 | |
|
Note 1 | |
|
Notes 2 & 3 | |
|
Note 2 & 4 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
579.6 |
|
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1,489.1 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
871.8 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
579.6 |
|
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,491.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.1; |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(670.0 |
) |
|
|
(69.7 |
) |
|
|
(453.2 |
) |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
|
|
4.3.4 |
|
|
|
(1,198.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
201.8 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
126.4 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(34.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
292.2 |
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42.6 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
4.3.1; 4.3.4 |
|
|
(129.4 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
79.9 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
125.7 |
|
Interest, other financial income and expense, net, exchange
gains and losses, net and others
|
|
|
(56.8 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(93.8 |
) |
|
4.3.2; 4.3.3 |
|
|
(158.7 |
) |
Variance on derivative of convertible bonds
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income
taxes
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
92.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
(130.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44.5 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) of consolidated companies
|
|
|
(19.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(84.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.3 |
) |
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(84.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(84.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
minority interests
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
12,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,704 |
|
Weighted average number of potential shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
12,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,704 |
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic
|
|
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diluted
|
|
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
CGGVERITAS UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2006 UNDER IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments for | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger and | |
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
the financing | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
CGG 9 | |
|
Veritas | |
|
adjustments | |
|
transactions | |
|
pro forma | |
|
|
months | |
|
9 months | |
|
9 months | |
|
9 months | |
|
statement of | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
income | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
October 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
ended | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
IFRS | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
IFRS | |
|
IFRS | |
|
2006 IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Note 1 | |
|
Note 1 | |
|
Notes 2 & 3 | |
|
Note 4 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
519.7 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,470.1 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
957.0 |
|
|
|
519.7 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,471.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.1; |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(636.7 |
) |
|
|
(390.0 |
) |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
|
4.3.4 |
|
|
|
(1,040.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
320.3 |
|
|
|
129.7 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
430.9 |
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.1; |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(86.9 |
) |
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
4.3.4 |
|
|
|
(115.5 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
217.6 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
289.6 |
|
Interest, other financial income and expense, net, exchange
gains and losses, net and others
|
|
|
(27.6 |
) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68.9 |
) |
|
4.3.2; 4.3.3 |
|
|
(92.1 |
) |
Derivative of convertible bonds and related costs
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income
taxes
|
|
|
167.0 |
|
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
(93.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
174.5 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(54.9 |
) |
|
|
(30.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
(58.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) of consolidated companies
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
(60.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
116.2 |
|
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
121.0 |
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
(60.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
125.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
(63.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123.9 |
|
minority interests
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
17,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,927 |
|
Weighted average number of potential shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
17,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,284 |
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diluted
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
CGGVERITAS UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE
SHEET
AS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 UNDER IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments for | |
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
the merger and | |
|
Combined pro | |
|
|
CGG | |
|
Veritas | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
the financing | |
|
forma | |
|
|
IFRS at | |
|
U.S. GAAP at | |
|
adjustments at | |
|
transactions at | |
|
balance sheet at | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
October 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Note 1 | |
|
Note 1 | |
|
Notes 2 & 3 | |
|
Note 4 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions) | |
ASSETS |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
279.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(147.8 |
) |
|
|
4.2.5 |
|
|
|
300.5 |
|
Current assets, net
|
|
|
576.4 |
|
|
|
230.5 |
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
798.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
745.1 |
|
|
|
510.0 |
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
(147.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098.9 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
273.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,110.0 |
|
|
|
4.2.1 |
|
|
|
2,383.8 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
134.5 |
|
|
|
256.0 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
207.7 |
|
|
|
4.2.1 |
|
|
|
604.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.1; |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets, net
|
|
|
598.2 |
|
|
|
162.6 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
776.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
1,006.6 |
|
|
|
418.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
2,335.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,764.4 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,751.7 |
|
|
|
928.6 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
2,188.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,863.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Current portion of financial debt
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
122.4 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(103.1 |
) |
|
|
4.2.5 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
322.4 |
|
|
|
186.8 |
|
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
4.2.1 |
|
|
|
503.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
377.3 |
|
|
|
309.2 |
|
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
(93.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
575.3 |
|
Financial debt
|
|
|
386.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,243.7 |
|
|
|
4.2.5 |
|
|
|
1,630.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.1; |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
113.6 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
228.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
500.4 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
1,313.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
850.5 |
|
|
|
592.3 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
967.7 |
|
|
|
4.2.2 |
|
|
|
2,405.5 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity and minority interests
|
|
|
874.0 |
|
|
|
592.3 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
967.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,429.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,751.7 |
|
|
|
928.6 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
2,188.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,863.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
CGGVERITAS UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT
OF INCOME
FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
UNDER U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
|
|
pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration | |
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources | |
|
|
|
|
|
for the | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
|
and related | |
|
|
|
|
|
merger and | |
|
pro forma | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
pro forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
the financing | |
|
income | |
|
|
CGG | |
|
adjustments | |
|
Veritas | |
|
adjustments | |
|
transactions | |
|
statement | |
|
|
12 months | |
|
8 months | |
|
12 months | |
|
12 months | |
|
12 months | |
|
12 months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
August 31, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Note 1 | |
|
Note 1 | |
|
Note 1 | |
|
Notes 2 & 3 | |
|
Note 4 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) | |
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
860.8 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
|
|
579.6 |
|
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,474.4 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(665.4 |
) |
|
|
(68.8 |
) |
|
|
(453.2 |
) |
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
4.3.1 |
|
|
|
(1,186.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
195.4 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
126.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
288.3 |
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55.8 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(92.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
4.3.1 |
|
|
|
(134.8 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
79.9 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
(34.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.8 |
|
Interest, other financial income and expense, net, exchange
gains and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.2 |
; |
|
|
|
|
|
losses, net and others |
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(93.8 |
) |
|
|
4.3.3 |
|
|
|
(127.1 |
) |
Variance on derivative of convertible bonds
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income taxes
and minority interests
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
92.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(128.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.8 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(93.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
12,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,704 |
|
Weighted average number of potential shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
12,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,966 |
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diluted
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
CGGVERITAS UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT
OF INCOME
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 UNDER
U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
merger and | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
the financing | |
|
pro forma | |
|
|
CGG | |
|
Veritas | |
|
adjustments | |
|
transactions | |
|
statement of | |
|
|
9 months | |
|
9 months | |
|
9 months | |
|
9 months | |
|
income | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
October 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Note 1 | |
|
Note 1 | |
|
Notes 2 & 3 | |
|
Note 4 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
967.7 |
|
|
|
519.7 |
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,479.3 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(636.4 |
) |
|
|
(390.0 |
) |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
4.3.1 |
|
|
|
(1,040.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
331.3 |
|
|
|
129.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
439.2 |
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51.9 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(87.4 |
) |
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
4.3.1 |
|
|
|
(117.7 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
215.0 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
278.5 |
|
Interest, other financial income and expense, net, exchange
gains and losses,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.2 |
; |
|
|
|
|
|
net and others |
|
|
(64.3 |
) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68.9 |
) |
|
|
4.3.3 |
|
|
|
(128.8 |
) |
Derivative of convertible bonds and related costs
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income taxes
and minority interests
|
|
|
136.6 |
|
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
(94.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135.6 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(41.4 |
) |
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
(41.8 |
) |
Minority interests
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
(61.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
17,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,927 |
|
Weighted average number of potential shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
17,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,284 |
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diluted
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
CGGVERITAS UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE
SHEET
AS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 UNDER U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
adjustments for | |
|
Combined pro | |
|
|
Historical CGG | |
|
Veritas | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
the merger and | |
|
forma balance | |
|
|
U.S. GAAP at | |
|
U.S. GAAP at | |
|
adjustments at | |
|
the financing | |
|
sheet at | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
October 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
transactions at | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
September 30, 2006 | |
|
2006 U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Note 1 | |
|
Note 1 | |
|
Notes 2 and 3 | |
|
Note 4 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
279.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147.8 |
) |
|
|
4.2.5 |
|
|
|
300.4 |
|
Current assets, net
|
|
|
581.5 |
|
|
|
230.5 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
4.2.3 |
|
|
|
831.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
750.2 |
|
|
|
510.0 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(127.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,131.5 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
286.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747.4 |
|
|
|
4.2.1 |
|
|
|
2,033.8 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
256.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207.7 |
|
|
|
4.2.1 |
|
|
|
563.0 |
|
Other non-current assets, net
|
|
|
615.3 |
|
|
|
162.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
4.2.1 |
|
|
|
796.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
1,001.0 |
|
|
|
418.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,973.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,392.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,751.2 |
|
|
|
928.6 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1,845.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,524.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Current portion of financial debt
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
122.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103.1 |
) |
|
|
4.2.5 |
|
|
|
63.4 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
352.6 |
|
|
|
186.8 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
4.2.1 |
|
|
|
540.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
407.5 |
|
|
|
309.2 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
(93.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
614.5 |
|
Financial debt
|
|
|
392.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,263.8 |
|
|
|
4.2.3 |
|
|
|
1,656.5 |
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
115.8 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
211.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
508.5 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1,329.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,867.7 |
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
811.7 |
|
|
|
592.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
609.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,018.8 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,751.2 |
|
|
|
928.6 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1,845.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,524.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
NOTES TO CGGVERITAS UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2005
AND AS AT AND FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
UNDER IFRS AND U.S. GAAP
NOTE 1 Description of transaction and basis
of presentation
|
|
|
Description of transaction |
The merger is described in the section entitled The
Veritas Merger contained elsewhere in this prospectus.
Pro forma adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined statement of income for each of the
12-month period ended
December 31, 2005 and the
nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006 are computed assuming the merger, the
acquisition of Exploration Resources and the financing
transactions for each of the merger and the acquisition of
Exploration Resources were completed on January 1, 2005.
Pro forma adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined balance sheet are computed assuming the
merger and the financing transactions were completed at
September 30, 2006.
There are certain differences in the way in which CGG and
Veritas present items on their respective statements of income
under U.S. GAAP. As a result, the gain recorded in
connection with the receipt of insurance proceeds for the loss
of seismic equipment in Veritas statement of income has
been reclassified in the IFRS and the U.S. GAAP unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial information to comply with
CGGs accounting presentation.
Balances and transactions between CGG and Veritas as at and for
the periods presented were eliminated as intercompany
transactions.
The CGG ADS price used to compute the fair value, under
U.S. GAAP, of the CGG ADSs issued in the merger is based on
the average closing price of a CGG ADS for the period beginning
two days before and ending two days after the date the merger
was officially announced (September 5, 2006). However,
under IFRS, the CGG ADS price used is the CGG ADS closing price
at the effective date of the merger (January 12, 2007).
|
|
|
Historical financial statements and currency
translation |
CGGs historical financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005 are presented in euros and are
derived from CGGs audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
CGGs historical financial statements as at and for the
nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006 are presented in euros and are derived
from CGGs unaudited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Veritas unaudited historical financial statements for the
twelve-month period
ended January 31, 2006 are presented in U.S. dollars
and are derived from Veritas audited and unaudited
financial statements.
All data related to Veritas historical statement of income
for the 12-month period
ended January 31, 2006 and the pro forma adjustments to the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income for
the twelve-month period
ended December 31, 2005 are translated into euros at
CGGs average rate for this period of
1.00 = U.S.$1.2418.
56
Combined Historical Veritas U.S. GAAP Statement of
Income for the Twelve-Month Period Ended January 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
|
Veritas | |
|
Veritas | |
|
Veritas | |
|
Veritas | |
|
Veritas | |
|
|
12 months | |
|
6 months | |
|
6 months | |
|
12 months | |
|
12 months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
July 31, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions) | |
|
(in $ millions) | |
|
(in $ millions) | |
|
(in $ millions) | |
|
(in millions) | |
|
|
(A) | |
|
(B) | |
|
(C) | |
|
(A) - (B) + (C) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
321.8 |
|
|
|
407.5 |
|
|
|
719.7 |
|
|
|
579.6 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(519.0 |
) |
|
|
(260.9 |
) |
|
|
(304.6 |
) |
|
|
(562.7 |
) |
|
|
(453.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
157.0 |
|
|
|
126.4 |
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
|
|
(37.3 |
) |
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
79.9 |
|
Interest, other financial income and expense, net, exchange
gains and losses, net and others
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income of consolidated companies before income taxes and
minority interests
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
115.1 |
|
|
|
92.7 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
107.5 |
|
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
33,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,393 |
|
Weighted average number of potential shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
35,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,442 |
|
Earning per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diluted
|
|
|
2.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this unaudited schedule is to reflect
Veritas unaudited statement of income for the twelve month
period ended January 31, 2006. The schedule has been
prepared only in connection with the compilation of the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements.
Certain items included in Veritas annual statements of
income for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 are derived
from annual calculations including net pension and
post-retirement benefit obligations, employee incentive awards
and income taxes, among other items. This schedule does not
consider the impact of how these items would have been different
had Veritas fiscal year ended on December 31, 2005.
Veritas historical financial statements as at and for the
nine-month period ended October 31, 2006 are presented in
U.S. dollars and are derived from Veritas unaudited
financial statements.
All data related to Veritas historical balance sheet at
October 31, 2006 and the pro forma adjustments to the
balance sheet at September 30, 2006 are translated into
euros at CGGs closing rate at September 30, 2006 of
1.00 = U.S.$1.2660.
All data related to Veritas historical statement of income
for the nine-month
period ended October 31, 2006 and the pro forma adjustments
to the statement of income for the
nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006 are translated into euros at CGGs
average rate for this period of
1.00 = U.S.$1.2420.
57
Combined Historical Veritas U.S. GAAP Statement of
Income for the Nine-Month Period Ended October 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
Historical | |
|
|
Veritas | |
|
Veritas | |
|
Veritas | |
|
Veritas | |
|
Veritas | |
|
|
12 months | |
|
6 months | |
|
3 months | |
|
9 months | |
|
9 months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
July 31, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
October 31, | |
|
October 31, | |
|
October 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions) | |
|
(in $ millions) | |
|
(in $ millions) | |
|
(in $ millions) | |
|
(in millions) | |
|
|
(A) | |
|
(B) | |
|
(C) | |
|
(A) - (B) + (C) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
822.2 |
|
|
|
407.5 |
|
|
|
230.8 |
|
|
|
645.5 |
|
|
|
519.7 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(623.2 |
) |
|
|
(304.6 |
) |
|
|
(165.8 |
) |
|
|
(484.4 |
) |
|
|
(390.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
199.0 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
161.1 |
|
|
|
129.7 |
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(43.2 |
) |
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
(44.5 |
) |
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
Interest, other financial income and expense, net, exchange
gains and losses, net and others
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income taxes
and minority interests
|
|
|
139.4 |
|
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
84.1 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(57.2 |
) |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
(37.6 |
) |
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
82.2 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
35,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,973 |
|
Weighted average number of potential shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
39,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,748 |
|
Earning per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diluted
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration Resources was consolidated into CGGs
consolidated financial statements ended December 31, 2005
commencing on September 1, 2005.
The pro forma income statement for the eight months ended
August 31, 2005 of Exploration Resources has been derived
from the U.S. GAAP income statement of Exploration
Resources for the eight months ended August 31, 2005.
The U.S. GAAP income statement of Exploration Resources for
the eight months ended August 31, 2005 and the related pro
forma adjustments have been translated at an average exchange
rate of NOK 8.0839 per euro.
58
Combined Historical Exploration Resources U.S. GAAP
Statement of Income and Related Pro forma Adjustments for the
Eight-Month Period ended August 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration | |
|
|
|
|
Purchase | |
|
Other | |
|
Resources and | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
accounting | |
|
adjustments | |
|
related | |
|
|
Exploration | |
|
Exploration | |
|
Exploration | |
|
pro forma | |
|
|
Resources | |
|
Resources | |
|
Resources | |
|
adjustments | |
|
|
8 months | |
|
8 months | |
|
8 months | |
|
8 months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
August 31, | |
|
August 31, | |
|
August 31, | |
|
August 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
)(b) |
|
|
63.8 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(58.7 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
)(a) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) (b)(c) |
|
|
(68.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
Interest, other financial income and expense, net, exchange
gains and losses, net and others
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) (d)(f) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income taxes
and minority interests
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
2.8 |
(a) |
|
|
3.6 |
(e) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
Notes:
|
|
(a) |
Reflects the impact (depreciation adjustment and related income
tax adjustment) of the reassessment of the value of Exploration
Resources assets in accordance with the principles of
purchase method accounting under IFRS, which reassessment
resulted notably in an increase in the book value of the vessels
of
116.8 million
as at September 1, 2005. |
|
(b) |
Reflects the elimination of material
inter-company
transactions pursuant to which members of the CGG group sold
equipment to Exploration Resources during the period presented
but prior to September 1, 2005. |
|
(c) |
Conforming Exploration Resources
multi-client survey
amortization method to CGGs accounting policies for such
amortization. |
|
(d) |
Reflects the interest on the $165,000,000 of existing notes
issued on April 28, 2005 and the $165,000,000 of existing
notes issued on February 3, 2006 in connection with the
financing of the acquisition of Exploration Resources as if such
notes were issued at par on January 1, 2005 and
amortization of related fees. |
|
(e) |
Recognition of the impact of deferred tax liabilities to the
adjustments set forth in the column Other
Adjustments. |
|
(f) |
Elimination of interest on the bridge credit facility from
September 1, 2005 through September 30, 2005, that was
put in place and drawn in connection with the acquisition of
Exploration Resources. |
The pro forma income statement for the eight months ended
August 31, 2005 of Exploration Resources has been derived
from the IFRS income statement of Exploration Resources for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, adjusted by the month
of September 2005 already consolidated in CGGs
consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2005. The
IFRS income statement of Exploration Resources for the eight
months ended August 31, 2005 and the related pro forma
adjustments have been translated at an average exchange rate of
NOK 8.0839 per euro.
59
Combined Historical Exploration Resources IFRS Statement of
Income and Related Pro Forma Adjustments for the Eight-Month
Period ended August 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
|
Purchase | |
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
accounting | |
|
|
|
|
|
Resources | |
|
|
Exploration | |
|
Exploration | |
|
Exploration | |
|
Other pro | |
|
and related pro | |
|
|
Resources | |
|
Resources | |
|
Resources | |
|
forma | |
|
forma | |
|
|
9 months | |
|
8 months | |
|
1 month | |
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
|
IFRS ended | |
|
IFRS ended | |
|
IFRS ended | |
|
Exploration | |
|
8 months ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
Resources (a) | |
|
August 31, 2005 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
IFRS | |
|
IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
)(b) |
|
|
68.7 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(67.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
)(a) |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
(b)(c) |
|
|
(69.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
Interest, other financial income and expense, net, exchange
gains and losses, net and others
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
)(d)(f) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income
taxes
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(9.4 |
)(a) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
)(e) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
attributable to minority interests
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
(a) |
Reflects the impact (depreciation adjustments and related income
for adjustment) of the reassessment of the value of Exploration
Resources assets in accordance with the principles of
purchase method accounting under IFRS, which reassessment
resulted notably in an increase in the book value of the vessels
of 116.8 as at
September 1, 2005. |
|
|
(b) |
Reflects the elimination of material
inter-company
transactions pursuant to which members of the CGG group sold
equity. |
|
(c) |
Conforming Exploration Resources
multi-client survey
amortization method to CGGs accounting policies for such
amortization. |
|
(d) |
Reflects the interest on the $165,000,000 of existing notes
issued on April 28, 2005 and the $165,000,000 of existing
notes issued on February 3, 2006 in connection with the
financing of the acquisition of Exploration Resources as if such
notes were issued at par on January 1, 2005 and
amortization of related fees. |
|
(e) |
Recognition of the impact of deferred tax liabilities to the
adjustments set forth in the column Other
Adjustments. |
|
(f) |
Elimination of interest on the bridge credit facility from
September 1, 2005 through September 30, 2005, that was
put in place and drawn in connection with the acquisition of
Exploration Resources. |
NOTE 2 Adjustments to Veritas
historical financial statements to ensure consistency of
accounting principles with CGGs historical financial
statements under IFRS and U.S. GAAP
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
under IFRS and U.S. GAAP includes adjustments to
Veritas historical financial statements (i) to
account for differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS and
(ii) to make Veritas application of U.S. GAAP
consistent with CGGs application of U.S. GAAP.
The deferred tax effect of these adjustments was computed at an
estimated tax rate of 35%.
60
PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 UNDER IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
adjustments to | |
|
|
|
|
intercompany | |
|
income statement | |
|
|
Pro forma consistency | |
|
elimination | |
|
12 months ended | |
|
|
adjustments | |
|
and other | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
under IFRS | |
|
adjustments | |
|
IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Ref. | |
|
Note 3 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
Other income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
Cost of operations
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
2.1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
2.2, 2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Interest, other financial income and expense, net, exchange
gains and losses, net and others
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income
taxes
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET AS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 UNDER
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
intercompany | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
elimination | |
|
adjustments to | |
|
|
Pro forma consistency | |
|
and other | |
|
balance sheet at | |
|
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Ref. | |
|
Note 3 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) | |
ASSETS |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Current assets, net
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
2.3, 2.4, 2.6 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
2.3, 2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Other non-current assets, net
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
2.3, 2.4, 2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current portion of financial debt
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
2.3, 2.6 |
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
3.1, 3.2 |
|
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
2.3, 2.5, 2.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF
INCOME
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 UNDER
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
to statement | |
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
intercompany | |
|
of income | |
|
|
consistency | |
|
elimination | |
|
9 months ended | |
|
|
adjustments | |
|
and other | |
|
September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
under IFRS | |
|
adjustments | |
|
IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Ref. | |
|
Note 3 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
Other income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
Cost of operations
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
2.1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income
taxes
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF
INCOME
FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
UNDER U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
adjustments | |
|
|
consistency | |
|
intercompany | |
|
to income statement | |
|
|
adjustments | |
|
elimination | |
|
12 months ended | |
|
|
under | |
|
and other | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
adjustments | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Ref. | |
|
Note 3 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
Cost of operations
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Interest, other financial income and expense, net, exchange
gains and losses, net and others
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income taxes
and minority interests
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS
TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF
INCOME
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 UNDER
U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments | |
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
to statement of | |
|
|
consistency | |
|
intercompany | |
|
income | |
|
|
adjustments | |
|
elimination | |
|
9 months ended | |
|
|
under | |
|
and other | |
|
September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
adjustments | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Ref. | |
|
Note 3 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
Cost of operations
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income taxes
and minority interests
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
64
PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
AS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 UNDER U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
intercompany | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
elimination | |
|
adjustments to | |
|
|
consistency | |
|
and other | |
|
balance sheet at | |
|
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Ref. | |
|
Note 3 | |
|
Ref. | |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions) | |
ASSETS |
Current assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
3.1, 3.2 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
Adjustment on multi-client surveys amortization of
Veritas |
CGG amortizes multi-client surveys over the period during which
the data is expected to be marketed using a pro-rata method
based on recognized revenues as a percentage of total estimated
sales (such estimation relies on the historical sales track
record). In this respect, CGG uses three different sets of
parameters depending on the area or type of surveys considered:
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf of Mexico surveys are amortized on the basis of 66.6% of
revenues. Starting at the time of data delivery, a minimum
straight-line depreciation scheme is applied on a three-year
period, should total accumulated depreciation from the 66.6% of
revenues amortization method below this minimum level; |
|
|
|
Rest of the world surveys: same as above except depreciation is
83.3% of revenues and straight-line depreciation is over a
five-year period from data delivery; and |
|
|
|
Long-term strategic 2D surveys are amortized on the basis of
revenues according to the above area split and straight-line
depreciation a seven-year period from data delivery. |
Veritas amortizes multi-client sales based upon the greater of
(x) the percentage of total costs to total estimated sales for
the first five years multiplied by actual sales (sales forecast
method) or (y) five years straight-line amortization from
the date of survey completion.
If Veritas had applied the same estimate of economic life as CGG
for the minimum straight-line depreciation for its surveys in
Gulf of Mexico and for its 2D surveys, multi-clients surveys
would have supported a higher amortization before
January 31, 2005, and a lower amortization after
January 31, 2005. The amortization expense on multi-client
surveys would have been
32.5 million
($40.3 million) instead of
45.3 million
($56.3 million) for the
twelve-month period
ended January 31, 2006 and
24.0 million
($29.8 million) instead of
28.6 million
($35.5 million) for the
nine-month period ended
October 31, 2006. The amortization expense of multi-
65
clientsurveys was thus adjusted by
12.8 million
($16.0 million) for the
twelve-month period
ended January 31, 2006 and
4.6 million
($5.7 million) for the
nine-month period ended
October 31, 2006 in Cost of operations in the
unaudited pro forma IFRS and U.S. GAAP condensed combined
income statement.
|
|
|
2.2 Reclassification of
specific items in the statement of income of Veritas |
Certain items reported under Other revenues
(expenses) in Veritas statement of income,
corresponding to a gain on the involuntary conversion of assets
amounting to
9.6 million
($11.9 million) for the twelve month period ended
December 31, 2005 have been reclassified in the IFRS and
U.S. GAAP unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements
of income to comply with CGGs accounting presentation.
|
|
|
2.3 Reclassification of
specific items in the balance sheet of Veritas (IFRS) |
Under IFRS, software is presented as an intangible asset in the
balance sheet. Software presented in other non-current assets in
Veritas historical balance sheet has been reclassified to
intangible assets in the IFRS unaudited pro forma condensed
combined balance sheet for
2.2 million
($2.8 million) as at September 30, 2006.
Under IFRS, deferred tax is presented as a non-current item in
the balance sheet. Deferred tax assets presented in current
assets in Veritas historical balance sheet have been
reclassified to non-current assets in the IFRS unaudited pro
forma condensed combined balance sheet for
6.5 million
($8.2 million) as at September 30, 2006. Deferred tax
liabilities presented in current liabilities in Veritas
historical balance sheet have been reclassified to non-current
liabilities in the IFRS unaudited pro forma condensed combined
balance sheet for
6.5 million
($8.3 million) as at September 30, 2006.
Under IFRS, debt issuing costs are presented as a reduction of
financial debt in the balance sheet. Debt issuing costs
presented in current assets in Veritas historical balance
sheet have been reclassified as a reduction of the current
portion of financial debt in the IFRS unaudited pro forma
condensed combined balance sheet for
1.1 million
($1.4 million) and debt issuing costs presented in
non-current assets in Veritas historical balance sheet
have been reclassified as a reduction of the current portion of
financial debt in the IFRS unaudited pro forma condensed
combined balance sheet for
1.7 million
($2.1 million) as at September 30, 2006.
|
|
|
2.4 Cancellation of deferred
charges in Veritas financial statements (IFRS) |
Deferred charges are not allowed under IFRS. Variance on
deferred charges included in the unaudited pro forma
Veritas balance sheet is recognized in the income
statement as an expense for
2.8 million
($3.5 million) for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 and as income for
2.7 million
($3.3 million) for the nine months ended September 30,
2006. As at September 30, 2006, deferred charges were
6.3 million
($8.0 million).
|
|
|
2.5 Veritas actuarial
gain and losses recorded directly in equity (IFRS) |
CGG opted under IFRS for recognition of actuarial gains and
losses directly in equity. Veritas cumulative actuarial
gains and losses on the U.K. pension plan are recognized
directly in equity for $9 million as at January 31,
2006 and for $8.7 million as at October 31, 2006 and
the corresponding amortization is cancelled in the unaudited pro
forma income statement for
0.5 million
($0.6 million) for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 and for
0.4 million
($0.5 million) for the nine months ended September 30,
2006.
|
|
|
2.6 Application of
proportional method to two Veritas subsidiaries
(IFRS) |
Under IFRS, subsidiaries on which the parent company exercises a
joint control are recorded using the proportional method in the
consolidated financial statements. CGGs preliminary
assessment of the control of two of Veritas subsidiaries
is that these subsidiaries are jointly controlled by Veritas and
CGG has therefore consolidated those subsidiaries into the IFRS
pro forma information using the proportional method. These
subsidiaries were accounted for under the equity method under
U.S. GAAP. The effect in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined income statement of accounting for those entities using
the proportional method under IFRS is an increase of
3.1 million
($3.9 million) on Operating revenues and an
increase of
3.4 million
($4.2 million) on Cost of operations for the
twelve-month period ending December 31, 2005 and an increase
66
of
3.0 million
($3.7 million) on Operating revenues and an
increase of
2.8 million
($3.5 million) on Cost of operations for the
nine month period ending September 30, 2006.
|
|
|
2.7 Cancellation of deferred
revenues in Veritas financial statements (IFRS) |
Under U.S. GAAP, revenues that are not fixed and
determinable are not recognized in the income statement but
deferred. Under IFRS, revenues that can be estimated reliably
can be recognized as items in the income statement. The variance
of deferred revenues that can be reliably estimable included in
Veritas balance sheet is recognized as revenues in the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for a
negative impact of
2.4 million
($3.0 million) for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 and for a negative impact of
0.1 million
($0.2 million) for the nine months ended September 30,
2006. As at September 30, 2006, deferred revenues were
6.6 million
($8.4 million).
|
|
|
2.8 Capitalization of development costs (IFRS) |
Based on a preliminary estimate of CGGs management, some
development costs were capitalized, amounting to
5.0 million
($6.2 million) for the twelve-month period ending
December 31, 2005 and
4.3 million
($5.3 million) for the nine month period ending
September 30, 2006.
NOTE 3 Other Pro forma adjustments
|
|
|
3.1 Intercompany transactions |
Intercompany elimination adjustments correspond to elimination
of intercompany transactions between CGG and Veritas, assuming
the merger would have been effective at January 1, 2005 for
the twelve-month period
ended December 31, 2005 and for the
nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006.
|
|
|
3.2 Other pro forma adjustments |
Other pro forma adjustments correspond to the cancellation of
costs related to the merger and expensed by Veritas for an
amount of
8.3 million
($10.3 million), assuming the merger would have been
effective at January 1, 2005 for the
nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006.
67
|
|
NOTE 4 |
Pro forma adjustments on Purchase Price Computation and
Purchase Price Allocation |
|
|
|
4.1 Purchase Price Computation and Purchase Price
Allocation |
|
|
|
4.1.1 Purchase Price Computation |
The computation of the purchase price under IFRS and
U.S. GAAP is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Veritas common stock outstanding at the merger closing
date of January 12, 2007 (in thousands)
|
|
|
36,478 |
|
Number of shares of Veritas common stock issued upon the
conversion of Veritas outstanding Convertible Senior Notes
due 2024
(in thousands)(1)
|
|
|
3,872 |
|
Number of shares of Veritas common stock reserved for the
issuance upon the conversion of Deferred Shares Units
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares of Veritas common stock at the merger
closing date of January 12, 2007 (in thousands)
|
|
|
40,351 |
|
Ratio to be applied for shares of Veritas common stock to be
exchanged for CGG ADSs
|
|
|
50.664 |
% |
Shares of Veritas common stock exchanged for CGG ADSs at the
merger closing date of January 12, 2007
|
|
|
20,443 |
|
Exchange ratio per Veritas share
|
|
|
2.25 CGG ADSs |
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of CGG ADSs issued (in thousands)
|
|
|
45,997 |
|
Remaining outstanding shares of outstanding Veritas
Convertible Senior Note due 2024 (ADS) (in thousands)
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
Total (in thousands)
|
|
|
48,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under U.S. GAAP | |
|
Under IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ | |
|
| |
|
$ | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except share data) | |
Under U.S. GAAP: Multiplied by CGGs average ADS price
(in U.S. dollars) for the period beginning two days before
and ending two days after the September 5, 2006 (the date
the merger was announced), and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under IFRS: Multiplied by CGGs closing ADS price (in
U.S. dollars) at the merger closing date of
January 12, 2007
|
|
$ |
32.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of CGG ADSs issued(A)
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
Total number of shares of Veritas common stock at the merger
closing date of January 12, 2007 (in thousands)
|
|
|
40,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio to be applied for shares of Veritas common stock to be
exchanged for cash
|
|
|
49.336 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Veritas common stock to be exchanged for cash at
July 31, 2006 (in thousands)
|
|
|
19,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid per Veritas share
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of compensation paid(B)
|
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
Total consideration given in exchange for Veritas shares(A)+(B)
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
Cash paid in exchange for Veritas outstanding stock options
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Estimated transaction
costs(2)
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Purchase price
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
2,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
(1) Convertible Senior Notes due
2024
For the purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements under IFRS, the conversion option embedded
in the Veritas convertible notes remaining outstanding after the
merger has been treated as an equity component. The fair value
of this conversion option amounts to $59 million
(46.6 million)
at the closing date of the merger and is part of the acquisition
price.
The principal of the convertible notes is classified as
financial debt of $25.5 million
(20.1 million).
This treatment, adopted for the preparation of these unaudited
pro forma condensed combined financial statements, is subject to
further analysis that could lead us to recognize the conversion
option as a liability.
(2) Direct transaction costs
CGGs estimated direct transaction costs (including
advisory fees and attorneys fees) amount to
$31 million
(24 million)
under IFRS and U.S. GAAP before tax. Veritas costs
related to the merger are expensed as incurred.
|
|
|
4.1.2 Purchase Price Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at October 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ | |
|
| |
|
$ | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Net book value of net assets acquired at October 31, 2006
(net of merger related costs incurred)
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
Allocation of purchase price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired technologies and in-process research and
development(1)
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Acquired customer
relationships(2)
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Reassessment of multi-client
library(3)
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Reassessment of property, plant &
equipment(4)
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Favorable
contracts(5)
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Contingent
liabilities(6)
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Deferred taxes on the above adjustments and other
(7)(8)
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (residual balance not allocated)
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
2,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Acquired technologies (useful life of 5 years) and
in-process research and development |
The fair value of Veritas technologies and in-process
research and development is based upon the preliminary estimates
of CGG management. The fair values of Veritas technologies
and identifiable intangible assets are based on global estimated
discounted net cash flows and are classified as intangible
assets in the balance sheet. In-process research and development
is preliminary estimated to be $16 million and would be
immediately expensed at the date of acquisition but not for
purposes of the preparation of the pro forma financial
statements. This charge has been excluded from the pro forma
adjustments as it is of a non-recurring nature.
|
|
(2) |
Acquired customer relationship (useful life of
20 years) |
The fair value of Veritas customer relationships is based
on preliminary estimated Veritas excess earnings,
excluding any potential synergies with CGG. Customer
relationships are classified as intangible assets in the balance
sheet.
69
|
|
(3) |
Reassessment of multi-client library (maximum useful life of
5 years) |
The fair value of Veritas multi-client library is based
upon the preliminary estimates of CGG management. The estimated
fair value of Veritas multi-client library was determined
utilizing a discounted cashflow method and is classified as an
intangible asset in the balance sheet.
|
|
(4) |
Reassessment of property, plant & equipment |
The fair value of Veritas property, plant and equipment is
based upon the preliminary estimates of CGG management as to the
market value of seismic equipment.
|
|
(5) |
Favorable contracts (weighted average remaining life of
6 years) |
The fair value of Veritas favorable contracts corresponds
to the difference in economic terms between Veritas
existing vessels charters conditions and general market
terms of vessels charters at the date of acquisition. Favorable
contracts are classified as intangible assets in the balance
sheet.
|
|
(6) |
Contingent liabilities |
Contractual obligations resulting from the merger and the change
of control of Veritas (related to a portion of the severance
costs for certain Veritas employees) have been recognized for an
amount of $12.8 million
(10.1 million).
|
|
(7) |
Deferred taxes on the above adjustments |
Deferred taxes on the above adjustments have been computed at a
U.S. tax rate of 35%. In the definitive purchase price
allocation and through the detailed analysis of each asset
according to the location of such asset, the deferred tax asset
will be computed for each asset at the related tax rate of the
country in which it is located, which might be different from
that of United States.
Under IFRS, the acquired in-process R&D identified in the
merger has been recognized in the balance sheet as an intangible
asset with the related deferred tax liability whereas, under
U.S. GAAP, it was expensed at the date of acquisition on a
gross basis in accordance with EITF 96-7 Accounting
for Deferred Taxes on In-Process Research and Development
Activities acquired in a Purchase Business Combination.
In connection with the purchase price allocation, under
U.S. GAAP, deferred revenues that represent a legal
performance obligation should be valued at their fair value. CGG
management has estimated that the carrying amount of deferred
revenues is at fair value.
|
|
|
4.2 Pro forma adjustments on the unaudited pro forma
combined balance sheet under IFRS and U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
4.2.1 Allocation of purchase price |
The allocation of the purchase price has been adjusted to
reflect the difference between the estimated U.S. GAAP book
value and the fair value of Veritas net assets, and taking
into account the accrual of estimated direct transaction costs
of $31 million
(24 million)
at September 30, 2006 before tax.
70
To account for differences between the U.S. GAAP book value
and the fair value of Veritas net assets, U.S. GAAP
pro forma adjustments have been made to record:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
$ | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Identifiable tangible assets
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Identifiable liabilities
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Additional goodwill at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
Deferred taxes on the above adjustments
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
To account for differences between the IFRS book value and the
fair value of Veritas net assets, adjustments have been
made to record:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
$ | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Identifiable tangible assets
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Identifiable liabilities
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Additional goodwill at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
Deferred taxes on the above adjustments
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
4.2.2 Adjustments to shareholders equity |
Adjustments have been made to adjust the IFRS and U.S. GAAP
shareholders equity for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to remove the historical balance of Veritas for an amount of
$750 million
(592 million)
at September 30, 2006; |
|
|
|
to cancel deferred revenues that do not correspond to a
performance obligation for an amount of $5.5 million before
tax
(4.3 million)
at September 30, 2006; |
|
|
|
to record the value at January 12, 2007 of CGGs ADSs
issued in the merger for an amount of $1,946 million
(1,537 million)
at September 30, 2006, under IFRS; and |
|
|
|
to record the value at September 5, 2006 of CGGs ADSs
issued in the merger for an amount of $1,558.5 million
(1,231 million)
at September 30, 2006, under U.S. GAAP. |
In addition, adjustments have been made to adjust IFRS
shareholders equity to cancel the minimum liability
component on the U.K. pension plan recorded in Veritas
U.S. GAAP financial statements.
|
|
|
4.2.3 Financing of the acquisition |
The term loan facility was drawn for an amount of
$1,000 million and the bridge loan facility was drawn for
an amount of $700 million to finance the cash component of
the merger consideration.
For the purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements, it has been assumed that the
$1,000 million
(790 million)
term loan facility and the $600 million
(474 million)
notes offered hereby were issued at January 1, 2005 to
finance the cash component of the merger consideration.
The issuance costs related to the bridge loan facility have been
estimated at $16.0 million, which will be written-off once
the bridge loan facility has been terminated.
71
|
|
|
4.2.4 Share-based payment adjustments |
As indicated in the merger agreement, each option granted by
Veritas that was outstanding and unexercised immediately prior
to the merger effective date, whether vested or not vested, was
cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in
cash equal to the excess, if any, of the cash paid in exchange
for shares of Veritas common stock (i.e. $75.0) over the
exercise price per share. The corresponding payment amounts to
$45 million and constitutes part of the purchase price.
|
|
|
4.2.5 Net effect of pro forma adjustment on cash |
The net effect of pro forma adjustments on cash is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in $ million | |
|
in million | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash-out for purchase price as disclosed in 4.1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation paid for Veritas shares
|
|
|
(1,493.0 |
) |
|
|
(1,179.3 |
) |
Cash paid in exchange for Veritas outstanding stock options
|
|
|
(45.0 |
) |
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
Estimated transaction costs
|
|
|
(31.0 |
) |
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
Cash-out for reimbursement of Convertible Notes due 2024 as
disclosed in 4.1.1(1)
|
|
|
(130.0 |
) |
|
|
(102.8 |
) |
Fees paid or engaged by Veritas and severance package as
disclosed in 4.1.2(6)
|
|
|
(46.0 |
) |
|
|
(36.5 |
) |
Cash-in for financing of the acquisition as disclosed in 4.2.3
composed of $1,000 million term loan facility and
$600 million notes offered hereby
|
|
|
1,600.0 |
|
|
|
1,263.8 |
|
Less: issuance costs paid on the term loan facility and the
notes offered hereby
|
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
|
|
(20.1 |
) |
Net financing
|
|
|
1,574.0 |
|
|
|
1,243.7 |
|
Less: issuance costs paid on the bridge loan facility
|
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net effect of pro forma adjustments on cash
|
|
|
(187.0 |
) |
|
|
(147.7 |
) |
The net effect on pro forma adjustments on cash is a decrease of
$187 million that corresponds to a decrease of
148 million
on the pro forma condensed, combined and unaudited balance sheet
at September 30, 2006 for both U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
|
|
|
4.3 Pro forma adjustments on the unaudited pro forma
combined statement of income under IFRS and
U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
4.3.1 Amortization of tangible and intangible assets at
fair value |
An adjustment has been made under U.S. GAAP to record the
amortization expense related to the fair value of identifiable
fixed assets from the purchase price for
30.6 million
($38 million) as cost of operations (for technologies,
multi-client surveys and property, plant and equipment) and
3.6 million
($4.5 million) as selling expenses (for customer
relationships) for the twelve month period ended
December 31, 2005, and for
22.9 million
($28.5 million) as cost of operations (for technologies,
multi-client surveys and property, plant and equipment) and
2.7 million
($3.4 million) as selling expenses (for customer
relationships) for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006, in the U.S. GAAP unaudited pro
forma condensed combined income statement.
An adjustment has been made under IFRS to record the
amortization expense related to the fair value of identifiable
fixed assets from the purchase price for
33.2 million
($41.2 million) as cost of operations (for technologies,
multi-client surveys and property, plant and equipment) and
3.6 million
($4.5 million) as selling expenses (for customer
relationships) for the twelve month period ended
December 31, 2005, and for
24.9 million
($30.9 million) as cost of operations (for technologies,
multi-client surveys and property, plant and equipment) and
2.7 million
($3.4 million) as selling expenses (for customer
relationships) for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006 in the IFRS unaudited pro forma
condensed combined income statement.
72
|
|
|
4.3.2 Interests costs and amortization of issuance costs
related to the financing of the acquisition |
Based on an estimated 7.5% interest rate and January 1,
2005 issuance date for the notes offered hereby and LIBOR plus a
margin of 2% for the term loan facility corresponding to a 7.3%
interest rate for both periods, an adjustment has been
recognized for an estimated pro forma interest expense of
94.8 million
($117.7 million) for the twelve month period ended
December 31, 2005, and for
71.1 million
($88.3 million) for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006, has been recorded in the respective
statements of income as Interest and other financial
expense. A change in the interest rate on the notes
offered hereby by 50 basis points would have changed the
pro forma interest expense by
2.4 million
($3.0 million) for the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2005 and
1.8 million
($2.3 million) for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006. The effect on net income would have
been a reduction of net income by
1.6 million
($2.0 million) for the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2005 and
1.2 million
($1.5 million) for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006.
A change in LIBOR by 50 basis points would have changed pro
forma interest expense by approximately $5.0 million per
year.
Additionally, based on total issuing fees estimated to
$22.5 million for the notes offered hereby and the term
loan facility, an estimated amortization expense of
2.4 million
($3.0 million) for the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2005, and of
1.8 million
($2.3 million) for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006, has been recorded in the respective
statements of income as Interest, other financial
expenses.
|
|
|
4.3.3 Interests costs on convertible bonds |
As CGG has assumed that the convertible bonds were converted
prior to the merger, CGG has cancelled the related interest
expense of
3.4 million
($4.2 million) for the twelve month period ended
December 31, 2005, and of
4.0 million
($5.0 million) for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006 in the pro forma adjustments.
|
|
|
4.3.4 Share-based payment adjustments |
As indicated in the merger agreement, each employee option
granted by Veritas which was outstanding and unexercised
immediately prior to the merger effective date, whether vested
or not vested, was cancelled and converted into the right to
receive an amount in cash equal to the excess, if any, of the
cash paid in exchange for Veritas share (i.e. $75.0) over the
exercise price per share. The corresponding payment amounted to
$45 million and constitutes part of the purchase price.
For IFRS pro forma purposes only, the related compensation costs
booked in Veritas historical financial statements have
been removed in the pro forma unaudited condensed combined
statements of income, for
1.2 million
($1.5 million) in cost of operations and for
1.3 million
($1.6 million) in general and administrative expenses for
the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005 and for
1.6 million
($2.0 million) in cost of operations and for
1.7 million
($2.1 million) in general and administrative expenses for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.
|
|
|
4.3.5 Deferred taxes effect |
The effect on deferred taxes of the IFRS pro forma adjustments,
computed at the U.S. tax rate of 35% for both periods, is a
net decrease of
49.9 million
($62.0 million) of the Income tax expense for
the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005 and a net
decrease of
34.2 million
($42.6 million) of the Income tax expense for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 in the
respective unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of
income under IFRS.
The effect on deferred taxes of the U.S. GAAP pro forma
adjustments, computed at the U.S. tax rate of 35% for both
periods, is a net decrease of
49.0 million
($60.9 million) of the Income tax expense for
the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005 and a net
decrease of
34.7 million
($43.1 million) of the Income tax expense for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 in the
respective unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of
income under U.S. GAAP.
73
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following managements discussion and analysis
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements of CGG and Veritas and the notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with
respect to future events and financial performance. Our actual
results may differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, such
as those set forth under Risk Factors and elsewhere
in this prospectus.
Introduction
CGG has historically divided its businesses into two segments,
geophysical services and geophysical products (seismic data
acquisition equipment produced by its Sercel subsidiaries).
CGG has historically organized its geophysical services business
into two geographical areas: the Western hemisphere, which
includes the Americas and the Eastern hemisphere, which includes
Europe, Eastern European countries, Africa and Asia-Pacific. CGG
also has historically divided services into three strategic
business units, or SBUs:
|
|
|
|
|
the Land SBU for land and shallow water seismic acquisition
activities; |
|
|
|
the Offshore SBU for marine seismic acquisition and multi-client
library sales; and |
|
|
|
the Processing & Reservoir SBU for seismic data
processing, data management and reservoir studies. |
CGGs Products segment, which it conducts through Sercel,
is made up of CGGs manufacturing and sales activities for
seismic data acquisition equipment, both on land and offshore.
Veritas has historically organized its business into four
reportable segments: North and South America (NASA); Europe,
Africa, Middle East and Commonwealth of Independent States
(EAME); Asia Pacific (APAC); and Veritas Hampson-Russel (VHR).
When Veritas conducts surveys on a contract basis, it acquires
and processes data for a single client who pays it to conduct
the survey and owns the data it acquires. When Veritas conducts
surveys on a multi-client basis, it acquires and processes data
for its own account and licenses that data and associated
products to multiple clients. NASA, EAME and APAC offer a common
suit of these products and services to their customers, although
each product or service may be adapted to meet the needs of the
local markets. VHR licenses geophysical software and provides
geophysical reservoir consulting services. The results of
VHRs operations were previously included in those of the
NASA region; however, beginning in fiscal 2006, senior
management of Veritas began to review the results of VHR
separately. This segmentation of Veritas is representative of
the manner in which it is viewed and managed by its senior
managers and its board of directors.
Following the merger, we intend to continue CGGs current
segmentation between geophysical services and products, and to
organize our services business both into geographical operating
segments for the western and eastern hemispheres, and into the
following business lines:
|
|
|
|
|
the land business line for land and shallow water seismic
acquisition and non-exclusive (multi-client) library
sales; |
|
|
|
the offshore business line for marine seismic acquisition,
multi-client library sales and related services; and |
|
|
|
the processing & reservoir business line for seismic
data processing, data management and reservoir studies. |
Purchases by CGG of geophysical equipment from Sercel have
historically been included in intragroup sales. Prior to the
merger, Veritas was a customer of Sercel, and following the
merger, purchases by Veritas of geophysical equipment from
Sercel are also included in intragroup sales.
74
Operating Results
The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition
and results of operations of each of CGG and Veritas should be
read in connection with the audited consolidated annual
financial statements and the unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements of CGG and the notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus, which have been prepared in
accordance with IFRS and in connection with the audited
consolidated annual financial statements and the unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements of Veritas and the
notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus, which have
been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
CGG adopted IFRS as its primary accounting principles from
January 1, 2005, and its first consolidated financial
statements under IFRS are those for the year ended at
December 31, 2005. They include comparative information for
the year ended December 31, 2004 using IFRS as used as at
and for the year ended December 31, 2005.
As permitted by the SEC for first time adoption of IFRS, CGG
filed for its first year of reporting under IFRS in its Annual
Report on
Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 two years rather than
three years of statements of income, changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows prepared in accordance
with IFRS, with appropriate related disclosure required by the
SEC concerning exceptions to IFRS and reconciliation to previous
generally accepted accounting principles applied by CGG.
International Financial Reporting Standards differ in certain
significant respects from U.S. GAAP. Note 31
(Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP) to CGGS
consolidated annual financial statements and Note 3
(Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP) to CGGS
consolidated interim financial statements describe the principal
differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to
CGG, and reconcile net income and shareholders equity to
U.S. GAAP as at and for the periods indicated therein.
Factors Affecting CGGVeritas Results of Operations
|
|
|
Geophysical Market Environment |
Overall demand for geophysical services is dependent upon
spending by oil and gas companies for exploration, production
development and field management activities. We believe the
level of spending by such companies depends on their perception
of the relationship between proven future reserves and expected
future energy consumption.
After many years of strong growth, the geophysical market in
1999, following a sharp drop in the price of oil, experienced a
deep recession, which we believe resulted in a reduction of more
than 40% in industry revenues compared to 1998. The geophysical
services market (particularly the offshore segment) has improved
since 1999 in terms of both volumes of sales and prices,
gradually until mid-2004, and then more rapidly.
We believe that two principal factors contributed to the slow
recovery from 1999 to mid-2004 of geophysical services despite
increasing oil and gas prices. First, global geopolitical
uncertainty, particularly following the events of
September 11, 2001 and the conflict in Iraq in 2003, harmed
the confidence and visibility that are essential to our main
clients long-term decision-making processes. As a
consequence, they delayed or cancelled many projects. Second,
geophysical service providers have generally not reacted
efficiently to the difficult industry environment and have, in
particular, failed to adjust their capacity in response to
reduced demand, leading to continuing excess supply pushing down
prices.
We believe that during 2004, oil and gas companies (including
both the major multinational oil companies and the national oil
companies) and the large oil and gas consuming nations suddenly
perceived a growing and potentially lasting imbalance between
the supply of and demand for hydrocarbons. A rapid rise in world
consumption requirements, particularly in China and India,
resulted in demand in hydrocarbons growing more rapidly than
anticipated. At the same time, the excess production capacity of
OPEC appeared to have reached historical lows, focusing
attention on existing production capacities and available
reserves. These market pressures from both the supply and demand
sides consequently produced a sharp rise in oil and gas prices.
The recognition of an imbalance between hydrocarbon supply and
demand has led the oil and gas industry to significantly
increase capital expenditures in exploration and production. The
seismic services market generally
75
benefits from this spending since seismic services are an
important element in the search for new reserves and extraction
of more oil from existing reservoirs.
|
|
|
Change in Scope of Offshore Activities |
CGG expanded the capacity of the fleet of its Offshore SBU from
five seismic acquisition vessels and one source vessel during
the first eight months of the nine month period ended
September 30, 2005 to thirteen seismic acquisition vessels
during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Its
capacity expansion included:
|
|
|
|
|
the technological upgrade of one source vessel, the
Laurentian, into a 3D seismic vessel in the second half
of 2005; and |
|
|
|
the addition to its existing fleet, through the acquisition of
Exploration Resources on September 1, 2005, of three owned
seismic vessels equipped for 2D studies (Princess,
Duke and Venturer), two owned vessels equipped for
3D studies (Search and C-Orion, the latter of
which was launched as a 3D vessel with 8 streamers in early
2006), one chartered cable vessel (Geo Challenger) that
was converted to a 3D seismic vessel and started seismic
operations as a 3D vessel since mid-May 2006 and one chartered
2D vessel (Pacific Titan). |
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the
Princess, Duke and Venturer 2D vessels
operated principally under a strategic alliance between
Exploration Resources and a subsidiary of Fugro N.V. prior to
CGGs acquisition of Exploration Resources and entered the
CGG fleet only progressively since then.
In March 2006, Veritas entered into an agreement with a third
party ship owner to charter a vessel currently known as the
Veritas Vision, which is currently being converted for
seismic operations. The term of the charter is for a fixed
period of eight years, with options of up to 10 more years. When
delivered in mid-2007, the Veritas Vision will be the
seventh seismic vessel in the Veritas fleet.
In September 2006, Veritas entered into a letter of intent to
charter a seismic vessel, currently known as the Viking
Poseidon, which is currently expected to be in service
commencing in the second calendar quarter of 2007. This vessel
will serve as a replacement for the Seisquest vessel, which is
under a charter that expires in May of 2007.
Subsequent to July 31, 2006, Veritas renewed its charter
agreement to extend the charter expiration related to the
Pacific Sword from October 2006 to October 2009.
The combination of Veritas fleet with that of CGGs
has created a combined seismic services business operating the
worlds leading seismic fleet of 20 vessels, including
14 high capacity 3D vessels.
The combined fleet provides highly flexible fleet management
potential with a balanced distribution of fully owned,
chartered, new built and significantly depreciated capacity.
Additionally, most of the vessels in the combined fleet have
been recently equipped with relatively new technology which
provide us with a fleet that can be managed without significant
investments in the near term.
|
|
|
Acquisitions and Disposals |
Acquisitions and disposals have a significant impact on our
revenue from one year to the next. Recent acquisitions and
disposals have included:
|
|
|
|
|
PT Alico. On February 14, 2005, CGG ended its
cooperation agreements with PT Alico, an Indonesian company. On
that date, PT Alico, which was fully consolidated in CGGs
accounts until 2004 as a consequence of CGGs contractual
relationship with them, was excluded from CGGs scope of
consolidation. Under CGGs agreements with PT Alico, CGG
indemnified PT Alico against certain specific risks. This
liability is limited and was accrued in our financial statements
as at December 31, 2004. The liability expired on
June 30, 2006, at which date CGG had no further commitment
to PT Alico or its shareholders. |
76
|
|
|
|
|
Vostok. On July 27, 2005, CGG established a new
company in Russia, CGG Vostok, which will undertake seismic
services. CGG Vostok has been part of CGGs consolidated
group from the date of its creation. |
|
|
|
Exploration Resources. On August 29, 2005, CGG
acquired a controlling stake of 60% of Exploration Resources ASA
(Exploration Resources), a Norwegian provider of
marine seismic acquisition services. The total cost to CGG of
the acquisition of 100% of the share capital was
303.3 million,
including
8.6 million
related to acquisition fees. The reassessment of Exploration
Resources net assets, along with CGGs evaluation of
the seismic businesss economic prospects, led CGG
primarily to increase the book value of the vessels (by
115 million
at September 1, 2005) and to record corresponding deferred
tax liabilities. CGG has included Exploration Resources in its
consolidated financial statements from September 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
TAQA. On March 27, 2006, CGG signed a memorandum of
understanding with Industrialization & Energy Services
Company (TAQA), its long term Saudi Partner in Argas (Arabian
Geophysical and Surveying Company), which is 51% owned by TAQA
and 49% by CGG. Pursuant to this agreement, on June 24,
2006, TAQA acquired 49% of the capital of CGG Ardiseis, a newly
formed CGG subsidiary dedicated to land and shallow water
seismic data acquisition in the Middle East, and CGG kept a 51%
interest. |
|
|
|
Cybernetix. On July 10, 2006, Sercel acquired for
4.0 million
a 20% interest in Cybernetix, a specialist in innovative
solutions in robotics and certain automatic machines, with the
aim of strengthening its technical partnership with Cybernetix
in offshore oil equipment. |
|
|
|
Veritas. On January 12, 2007, CGG acquired Veritas
pursuant to the merger agreement. See The Veritas
Merger. |
|
|
|
Vibtech. On September 28, 2006, Sercel acquired all
the outstanding shares in Vibration Technologies Limited
(Vibtech) in a private transaction, for cash
consideration of
49.5 million,
with the preliminary goodwill recorded in connection with the
transaction amounting to
34.4 million.
Based in Scotland and founded in 1996, Vibtech has pioneered the
use of advanced wireless technologies for seismic recording. |
The Veritas merger and the Vibtech merger are not reflected in
the financial statements under discussion in this
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations.
Backlog estimates are based on a number of assumptions and
estimates, including assumptions as to (in the case of CGG)
exchange rates between the euro and the U.S. dollar and
estimates of the percentage of completion contracts. Contracts
for services are occasionally modified by mutual consent and in
certain instances are cancelable by the customers on short
notice without penalty. Consequently, backlog as of any
particular date may not be indicative of actual operating
results for any succeeding period.
Backlog for CGGs Services segment represents the revenues
it expects to receive from commitments for contract services it
has with its customers and, in connection with the acquisition
of multi-client data, represents the amount of pre-sale
commitments for such data. Backlog for CGGs Products
segment represents the total value of orders it has received but
not yet fulfilled.
CGGs total backlog (Services and Products) as at
December 31, 2006, stood at $998 million, of which
$587 million was for Services and $411 million was for
Products, excluding intra-group sales, up 2.9% from
$970 million as at December 31, 2005, of which
$758 million was for Services and $212 million was for
Products, excluding intra-group sales.
CGGs backlog as at September 30, 2006 was
$1,100 million compared to $760 million as at
September 30, 2005.
77
Veritas measures backlog differently from CGG and, as such, the
respective backlog figures of CGG and Veritas before the merger
are not necessarily comparable. Veritas backlog consists
of firm orders or incomplete contracts. Veritas defines firm
orders to be those confirmed and acknowledged in writing by the
customer (i.e., purchase orders or signed letters of award,
commitment or intent). Such orders are not expected to be
cancelled and are expected to be finalized in the form of a
contract, supplement or other final executed arrangement.
Contracts for services are subject to modification by mutual
consent and in certain instances are cancelable by the customer
on short notice without penalty. As a result of these factors,
backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of
actual operating results for any succeeding period.
As at July 31, 2006, Veritas backlog of commitments
for future revenue was $456.4 million, compared with
$301.8 million as at July 31, 2005. Veritas expects
that 90% of its July 31, 2006 backlog will be completed by
October 2007.
As at October 31, 2006, Veritas backlog of
commitments for future revenue was $550 million, an
increase of 20% compared with $459 million as at
October 31, 2005.
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Fluctuations |
As a company that derives a substantial amount of its revenue
from sales internationally, our results of operations are
affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. The merger
will increase both our dollar-denominated revenues and expenses,
as Veritas revenues and expenses have historically been
denominated largely in U.S. dollars. See Risk
Factors Risks Related to Our Business
Our results of operations may be significantly affected by
currency fluctuations.
In order to present trends in its business that may be obscured
by currency fluctuations, we have translated certain euro
amounts in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations into
U.S. dollars. See Trend
Information Currency Fluctuations.
CGG Critical Accounting Policies
CGGs significant accounting policies, which it has applied
consistently, are fully described in Note 1 to CGGs
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. However, certain of CGGs accounting policies
are particularly important to the portrayal of its financial
position and results of operations, and these are described
below. As CGG must exercise significant judgment when it applies
these policies, their application is subject to an inherent
degree of uncertainty.
Operating revenues are recognized when they can be measured
reliably, and when it is likely that the economic benefits
associated with a transaction will flow to the relevant entity,
which is at the point that such revenues have been realized or
are considered realizable. For contracts where the percentage on
completion method of accounting is being applied, revenues are
only recognized when the costs incurred for the transaction and
the cost to complete the transaction can be measured reliably
and such revenues are considered earned and realizable.
Multi-client surveys consist of seismic surveys to be licensed
to customers on a non-exclusive basis. All costs directly
incurred in acquiring, processing and otherwise completing
seismic surveys are capitalized into the multi-client surveys.
The value of CGGs multi-client library is stated on its
balance sheet at the aggregate of those costs less accumulated
amortization or at fair value if lower. CGG reviews the library
for potential impairment of its independent surveys on an
ongoing basis.
Revenues related to multi-client surveys result from
(i) pre-commitments and (ii) licenses after completion
of the surveys (after-sales).
78
Pre-commitments Generally, CGG obtains
commitments from a limited number of customers before a seismic
project is completed. These pre-commitments cover part or all of
the survey area blocks. In return for the commitment, the
customer typically gains the right to direct or influence the
project specifications, advance access to data as it is being
acquired, and favorable pricing. CGG records payments that it
receives during periods of mobilization as advance billing in
the balance sheet in the line item Advance billings to
customers.
CGG recognizes pre-commitments as revenue when production is
begun based on the ratio of project cost incurred during that
period to total estimated project cost. CGG believes this ratio
to be generally consistent with the physical progress of the
project.
After sales Generally, CGG grants a license
entitling non-exclusive access to a complete and ready for use,
specifically-defined portion of its multi-client data library in
exchange for a fixed and determinable payment. CGG recognizes
after sales revenue upon the client executing a valid license
agreement and having been granted access to the data. Within
thirty days of execution and access, the client may exercise
CGGs warranty that the medium on which the data is
transmitted (a magnetic cartridge) is free from technical
defects. If the warranty is exercised, CGG will provide the same
data on a new magnetic cartridge. The cost of providing new
magnetic cartridges is negligible.
After sales volume agreements CGG enters into
customer arrangements in which it agrees to grant licenses to
the customer for access to a specified number of blocks of the
multi-client library. These arrangements typically enable the
customer to select and access the specific blocks for a limited
period of time. CGG recognizes revenue when the blocks are
selected and the client has been granted access to the data.
Within thirty days of execution and access, the client may
exercise CGGs warranty that the medium on which the data
is transmitted (a magnetic cartridge) is free from technical
defects. If the warranty is exercised, CGG will provide the same
data on a new magnetic cartridge. The cost of providing new
magnetic cartridges is negligible.
In exclusive surveys, CGG performs seismic services (acquisition
and processing) for a specific customer. CGG recognizes
proprietary/contract revenues as the services are rendered. CGG
evaluates the progress to date, in a manner generally consistent
with the physical progress of the project, and recognizes
revenues based on the ratio of the project cost incurred during
that period to the total estimated project cost. CGG believes
this ratio to be generally consistent with the physical progress
of the project.
The billings and the costs related to the transits of seismic
vessels at the beginning of the survey are deferred and
recognized over the duration of the contract by reference to the
technical stage of completion.
In some exclusive survey contracts and a limited number of
multi-client survey contracts, CGG is required to meet certain
milestones. CGG defers recognition of revenue on such contracts
until all milestones that provide the customer a right of
cancellation or refund of amounts paid have been met.
|
|
|
|
|
Other geophysical services |
Revenues from CGGs other geophysical services are
recognized as the services are performed and, when related to
long-term contracts, using the performance method of recognizing
income.
CGG recognizes revenues on equipment sales upon delivery to the
customer. Any advance billings to customers are recorded in
current liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Software and hardware sales |
CGG recognizes revenues from the sale of software and hardware
products following acceptance of the product by the customer at
which time CGG has no further significant vendor obligations
remaining. Any advance billings to customers are recorded in
current liabilities.
If an arrangement to deliver software, either alone or together
with other products or services, requires significant
production, modification, or customization of software, the
entire arrangement is accounted for as a production-type
contract, i.e. using the percentage of completion method.
79
If the software arrangement provides for multiple deliverables
(e.g. upgrades or enhancements, post-contract customer support
such as maintenance, or services), the revenue is allocated to
the various elements based on specific objective evidence of
fair value, regardless of any separate allocations stated within
the contract for each element. Each element is appropriately
accounted for under the applicable accounting standard.
Maintenance revenues consist primarily of post contract customer
support agreements and are recorded as advance billings to
customers and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis
over the contract period.
Multi-client surveys consist of seismic surveys to be licensed
to customers on a non-exclusive basis. All costs directly
incurred in acquiring, processing and otherwise completing
seismic surveys are capitalized into the multi-client surveys.
The value of CGGs multi-client library is stated on its
balance sheet at the aggregate of those costs less accumulated
amortization or at fair value if lower. CGG reviews the library
for potential impairment of its independent surveys on an
ongoing basis.
CGG amortizes the multi-client surveys over the period during
which the data is expected to be marketed using a pro-rata
method based on recognized revenues as a percentage of total
estimated sales (such estimation relies on the historical sales
track record).
In this respect, CGG uses three different sets of parameters
depending on the area or type of surveys considered:
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf of Mexico surveys are amortized on the basis of 66.6% of
revenues. Starting at time of data delivery, a minimum
straight-line depreciation scheme is applied on a three-year
period, should total accumulated depreciation from the 66.6% of
revenues amortization method be below this minimum level; |
|
|
|
Rest of the world surveys: same as above except depreciation is
83.3% of revenues and straight-line depreciation is over a
five-year period from data delivery; and |
|
|
|
Long term strategic 2D surveys are amortized on the basis of
revenues according to the above area split and straight-line
depreciation on a seven-year period from data delivery. |
Expenditures on research activities undertaken with the prospect
of gaining new scientific or technological knowledge and
understanding are recognized in the income statement as expenses
as incurred and are presented as Research and development
expenses net.
Expenditure on development activities, whereby research findings
are applied to a plan or design for the production of new or
substantially improved products and processes, are capitalized
if:
|
|
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately
identified and reliably measured, |
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, |
|
|
|
CGG has sufficient resources to complete development, and |
|
|
|
the intangible asset is likely to generate future economic
benefits, either because it is useful to CGG or through an
existing market for the intangible asset itself or for its
products. |
Expenditures capitalized include the cost of materials, direct
labor and an appropriate proportion of overhead. Other
development expenditures are recognized in the income statement
as expenses as incurred and are presented as Research and
development expenses net.
Capitalized development expenditures are stated at cost less
accumulated amortization and impairment losses.
CGG amortizes capitalized developments costs over
five years.
80
Research & development expenses in CGGs income
statement represent the net cost of development costs that are
not capitalized, of research costs, offset by government grants
acquired for research and development.
In accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of assets, the
carrying amounts of CGGs assets, other than inventories
and deferred tax assets, are reviewed at each balance sheet date
to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If
any such indication exists, CGG estimates the assets
recoverable amount. Factors CGG considers important by that
could trigger an impairment review include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to expected operating
results based upon historical and/or projected data; |
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of CGGs use of the
acquired assets or the strategy for its overall
business; and |
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends. |
The recoverable amount of tangible and intangible assets is the
greater of their net fair value less costs to sell and value in
use.
For cash generating units comprised of goodwill, assets that
have an indefinite useful life or intangible assets that are not
yet available for use, CGG estimates the recoverable amount at
each balance sheet date.
CGG determines the recoverable amounts by estimating future cash
flows expected from the assets or from the cash generating
units, discounted to their present value using a discount rate
that reflects current market assessments of the time value of
money and the risks specific to the asset.
CGG recognizes an impairment loss whenever the carrying amount
of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount. For an asset that
does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the
recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to
which the asset belongs.
Impairment losses are recognized in the income statement.
Impairment losses recognized in respect of a group of non
independent assets allocated to a cash-generating unit are
allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill
allocated to cash-generating units (group of units) and then, to
reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the unit
(group of units) on a pro rata basis.
CGG recognizes a provision for onerous contracts corresponding
to its estimates of the excess of the unavoidable costs of
meeting the obligations under the contract over the economic
benefits expected to be received under the contract estimated by
CGG.
As CGGs $85 million 7.75% subordinated bonds due
2012 convertible into new ordinary shares or redeemable into new
shares and/or existing shares and/or in cash issued in 2004 are
denominated in U.S. dollars and convertible into new
ordinary shares denominated in euros, the embedded conversion
option has been bifurcated and accounted separately within
non-current liabilities. The conversion option and the debt
component were initially recognized at fair value on issuance.
The amount of the debt component to be recorded within the
financial statements has been discounted at the rate of 10.75%,
the rate borne by comparable indebtedness without a conversion
option. As a result, CGG has bifurcated the embedded conversion
option by
10.5 million
at the issuance of the bonds as Other non-current
assets. The discounting of the bonds at issuance is
accounted for as Cost of financial debt until the
maturity of the bonds.
Changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative are
recognized in the consolidated income statement in the line item
Variance on derivative convertible bonds. The fair
value of the embedded derivative has been determined using a
binomial model.
81
Veritas Critical Accounting Policies
Veritas significant accounting policies, which it has
applied consistently in accordance with U.S. GAAP, are
fully described in Note 1 to Veritas consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
However, certain of Veritas accounting policies are
particularly important to the portrayal of its financial
position and results of operations, and these are described
below. As Veritas must exercise significant judgment when it
applies these policies, their application is subject to an
inherent degree of uncertainty.
Customer contracts for Veritas services vary in terms and
conditions. Veritas reviews the deliverables in each contract
and, where applicable, applies the accounting guidance contained
in EITF 00-21,
Accounting for Revenue Contracts with Multiple
Deliverables
(EITF 00-21).
For contract services, Veritas recognizes revenue on a
proportional performance method based upon output measures as
work is performed. This method requires that Veritas recognize
revenue based upon quantifiable measures of progress, such as
kilometers shot or processed. In contracts where its customer
pays separately for the mobilization of equipment,
EITF 00-21
requires Veritas to recognize such mobilization fees as revenue
during the performance of the seismic acquisition, using the
same proportional performance method as for the acquisition work.
Revenue from the licensing of multi-client surveys is based upon
agreed rates set forth in the contract and are recognized upon
physical delivery of, or customer access to, the surveys. During
the acquisition and processing phase of a multi-client survey,
in most cases Veritas recognizes revenue on in
process multi-client surveys after obtaining a signed license
agreement that gives the customers access to survey results as
they occur, based upon a proportional performance method, using
quantifiable measures of progress, such as kilometers shot or
processed. After completion of a multi-client survey, Veritas
recognizes revenue upon delivery of, or customer access to, the
data to its customer or the customers designee.
Provisions exist in certain contracts with Veritas customers
that provide for a full refund if certain deadlines are not met
or provide for a revenue sharing arrangement with the customer
such that the final sales price is not fixed or determinable.
For contracts with these provisions, Veritas does not recognize
the revenue under the proportional performance method for that
contract and, instead, defers revenue recognition until
performance is complete or the sales price is fixed or
determinable.
|
|
|
Multi-Client Data Library |
Veritas collects and processes geophysical data for its own
account and retains all ownership rights. Veritas licenses the
data to clients on a non-transferable basis. In some
circumstances, Veritas has sold, on a non-exclusive basis,
rights to data prior to its collecting and processing such data,
i.e., Veritas has made the first of what it anticipates will be
multiple discrete sales of licenses to the same data.
Veritas capitalizes costs associated with acquiring and
processing the data as an investment in its multi-client data
library. The capitalized costs of multi-client data are charged
to cost of services in the period sales of licenses occur based
upon the greater of the percentage of total costs to total
estimated sales for the first five years multiplied by actual
sales, a process called the sales forecast method, or five-year
straight-line amortization from the date of survey completion.
The sales forecast method is Veritas primary method of
calculating cost of services. Veritas believes this method of
amortizing the capitalized costs aligns the amount of
amortization to the period in which the economic benefits of the
capitalized costs are consumed.
Estimated sales are determined based upon discussions with
clients, Veritas experience and its knowledge of industry
trends. Changes in sales estimates may have the effect of
changing the percentage relationship of cost of services to
revenue. In applying the sales forecast method, an increase in
the projected sales of a survey will result in lower cost of
services as a percentage of revenue, and higher earnings when
revenue associated with that particular survey is recognized,
while a decrease in projected sales will have the opposite
effect.
82
Assuming that the overall volume of sales, the mix of surveys
generating revenue in the period, and minimum amortization
amounts were held constant in fiscal 2006, an increase of 10% in
the sales forecasts of all of Veritas surveys would have
decreased its cost of services by less than 2%, or
$12 million.
Veritas ability to accurately forecast sales of its
library surveys for several years into the future is affected by
unforeseeable changes in commodity prices, exploration success
in the area of the survey and the overall investment decisions
of its customers. Therefore, Veritas updates its sales forecast
for surveys with a significant book value on a quarterly basis
to ensure that the most current market information is considered.
The total amortization period of 60 months represents the
minimum period over which benefits from these surveys are
expected to be derived. Veritas has determined the amortization
period of 60 months based upon its historical experience
that indicates that the majority of its revenue from
multi-client surveys are derived during the acquisition and
licensing phases and during the five years subsequent to survey
completion. Any future decrease in the minimum amortization
period would have the effect of increasing cost of services and
reducing the carrying value of the multi-client data library.
Veritas periodically reviews the carrying value of the
multi-client data library to assess whether there has been a
permanent impairment of value and record losses when it is
determined that estimated future sales would not be sufficient
to cover the carrying value of the asset. Any future reductions
in sales estimates may result in an impairment charge that
increases cost of services and reduces the carrying value of the
multi-client data library.
Deferred taxes result from the effect of transactions that are
recognized in different periods for financial and tax reporting
purposes. A valuation allowance, by tax jurisdiction, is
established when it is more likely than not that at least some
portion of the related deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The amount of a valuation allowance is later reduced if
realization of the related deferred tax asset subsequently
becomes more likely than not. As at July 31, 2006, we had
$19.3 million of valuation allowances related to deferred
tax assets in jurisdictions where historical losses or certain
limitations on their use indicate realization is doubtful.
|
|
|
Software Capitalization and Amortization |
Software available for sale is included in other assets on our
consolidated balance sheets. Software acquired through the
purchase of software companies is capitalized at its estimated
fair market value through the allocation of the purchase price.
For internally developed software, Veritas capitalizes costs
associated with the development of the product from the time the
product reaches technological feasibility until it is ready for
commercial release.
The amortization of capitalized software is the greater of the
amount computed using (a) the ratio that current gross
revenue for a product bear to the total of current and
anticipated future gross revenue for that product or
(b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated
economic life of the product including the period being reported
on. The period of amortization begins when the software is
released to the market. Estimated useful lives of Veritas
software products range from three to five years.
Estimated sales are determined based upon discussions with
clients, Veritas experience and its knowledge of industry
trends. Changes in sales estimates will have the effect of
changing cost of services. An increase in projected sales will
result in lower cost of services as a percentage of sales and
higher earnings. A decrease in projected sales will result in
higher cost of services as a percentage of sales and lower
earnings. Any future increases or decreases in our estimates of
useful lives will have the effect of decreasing or increasing
future cost of services with an inverse effect on earnings.
As at August 1, 2005, Veritas adopted the Financial
Accounting Standard Board Statement No. 123(R)
(SFAS 123R) to account for share based compensation.
SFAS 123R requires Veritas to record the cost of stock
options and other equity-based compensation in its income
statement based upon the estimated fair value of those awards.
Veritas elected to use the modified prospective method for
adoption, which requires compensation expense to be recorded for
all unvested stock options and other equity-based compensation
beginning in the first
83
quarter of adoption. For all unvested options outstanding as at
August 1, 2005, the previously measured but unrecognized
compensation expense, based on the fair value at the original
grant date, Veritas began recognizing in the statement of
operations over the remaining vesting period. For equity-based
compensation granted subsequent to August 1, 2005,
compensation expense, based on the fair value on the date of
grant, Veritas began recognizing in the statement of operations
over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of stock
based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including
estimating the expected term of stock options, the expected
volatility of its stock and the amount of stock options to be
forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these
estimates, share based compensation expense and the results of
operations could be materially impacted. As at July 31,
2006, there was $7.3 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation
arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized on a
straight line basis over the weighted average remaining period
which is approximately two years.
Veritas maintains a contributory defined benefit pension plan
(the Pension Plan) for eligible participating
employees in the United Kingdom. Monthly contributions by
employees are equal to 7% of their salaries increased from 5.5%
effective December 1, 2005. Veritas provides an additional
contribution in an actuarially determined amount necessary to
fund future benefits to be provided under the Pension Plan.
Benefits provided are based upon 1/60 of the employees
final pensionable salary (as defined in the Pension Plan) for
each complete year of service up to 2/3 of the employees
final pensionable salary and increase annually in line with
inflation subject to a maximum of 5% per annum. The Pension
Plan also provides for 50% of such actual or expected benefits
to be paid to a surviving spouse upon the death of a
participant. Pension Plan assets consist mainly of investments
in marketable securities that are held and managed by an
independent trustee.
The Pension Plan is impacted by certain actuarial assumptions,
including the discount rate, the expected rate of return on plan
assets and expected salary increases. These rates are evaluated
by outside actuaries and senior management on an annual basis
and adjusted only as appropriate to reflect changes in market
rates and outlook. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the net
amount by which actual results differ from our assumptions is
deferred. If this net deferred amount exceeds 10% of the greater
of plan assets or liabilities, a portion of the deferred amount
is included in expense for the following year. The cost or
benefit of plan changes, such as increasing or decreasing
benefits for prior employee service (prior service cost), is
deferred and included in expense on a straight-line basis over
the average remaining service period of the employees expected
to receive benefits.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets reflects
the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or
to be invested to provide for the benefits included in the
projected benefit obligation. Veritas has used a rate it
believes is appropriate for long-term investment in an
equity-based portfolio. For fiscal 2006, the average return on
assets assumption was 6.5% compared to a historical actual rate
of return of 6.5% over the past 10 years. A 0.25% decrease
in the expected return on plan assets would increase
Veritas net periodic pension cost by $0.1 million.
The discount rate is determined by using the return available
from an index of AA-rated corporate non-callable bonds of
appropriate duration and currency. For fiscal 2006, the discount
rate used was 5% A 0.25% decrease in the discount rate would
increase Veritas net periodic pension cost by
$0.3 million.
For fiscal 2007, Veritas plans to contribute $1.4 million
to the pension scheme and expects to continue to fund the
pension scheme at an appropriate level over the remaining life
of the scheme. Veritas has contributed £3.0 million to
this pension scheme prior to the close of the merger and has
planned to contribute the following additional amounts:
£3.3 million on November 28, 2007,
£3.65 million on November 28, 2008 and
£3.65 million on November 28, 2009.
In fiscal 2006, Veritas recorded net pension expense of
$2.8 million compared to $1.2 million in fiscal 2005
and $1.0 million in fiscal 2004.
84
Results of Operations
The following is a discussion and analysis of the results of
operations of CGG and Veritas on a stand-alone basis.
CGG Results of Operations
Nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared with nine
months ended September 30, 2005
CGGs consolidated operating revenues increased 57% to
955.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
607.5 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Expressed in
U.S dollar terms, consolidated operating revenues increased 54%
to $1,186.5 million from $768.7 million. The increase
was attributable to both the Products segment and to the
Services segment, and particularly to the Offshore SBU as
detailed below.
The following table sets forth CGGs consolidated operating
revenues by activity (excluding intra-group sales), and the
percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented
thereby, during each of the periods stated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) | |
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land SBU
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
Offshore SBU
|
|
|
404.1 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
222.3 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
Processing & Reservoir SBU
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Services
|
|
|
603.3 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
391.6 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
Products
|
|
|
352.3 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
215.9 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
607.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues for the Services segment (excluding
intra-group sales) increased 54% to
603.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
391.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Expressed in
U.S. dollars, operating revenues increased 51% to
$747.4 million from $495.0 million. This increase was
primarily attributable to the Offshore SBU.
Land SBU. Operating revenues for the Land SBU increased
10% to
96.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
88.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. In
U.S. dollars terms, operating revenues increased 8% to
$120.0 million from $111.1 million. The increase was
attributable to a higher than usual level of backlog primarily
during the first six months of 2006 in a market that remains
competitive.
On average (including Argas), eleven crews were in operation
both during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
during the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Offshore SBU. Operating revenues for the Offshore SBU
increased 82% to
404.1 million
for nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
222.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Expressed in
U.S. dollars, operating revenues increased 78% to
$500.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 from $281.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. This increase was mainly due to the
expansion of CGGs fleet size to nine 3D vessels in
operations at September 30, 2006 from five 3D vessels during
85
the first eight months of the nine months period ended
September 30, 2005, price increases in the exclusive marine
market, effective use of CGGs seismic vessels capacity and
high after-sales of its multi-client surveys.
Exclusive sales increased 76% to
238.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
135.8 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, due
principally to higher prices and increased capacity. CGGs
increase in multi-clients survey acquisition in the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, was almost proportional to the
increase in its 3D capacity and its new 2D activity in exclusive
surveys. As a result, as a percentage of total Offshore SBU
sales, exclusive contracts accounted for 59% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 compared to 61% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005.
Multi-client data sales increased 92% to
165.4 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
86.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 due to a
significant increase in both after-sales and pre-commitment
sales. Pre-commitment sales increased to
46.4 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
13.7 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2005, due to various
multi-clients surveys in progress in Brazil and in the Gulf of
Mexico. After-sales levels increased by 64% to
119.0 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
72.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, and particularly in the
three months ended March 31, 2006, there was a high demand
for data in the Gulf of Mexico, where exploration licenses were
allocated in March 2006, and in Brazil, where exploration blocks
awarded in 2005 were effectively allocated at the beginning of
2006.
The net book value of CGGs marine multi-clients data
library was
69.8 million
at September 30, 2006 compared to
93.6 million
at December 31, 2005. On March 31, 2006, the Norwegian
government decided not to award exploration-production licenses
on blocks where one of CGGs surveys (Moere) is located. As
this decision changed CGGs previous estimate of future
sales, this
4.6 million
survey was fully depreciated at March 31, 2006 and remained
fully depreciated at September 30, 2006.
Processing & Reservoir SBU. Operating revenues
for the Processing & Reservoir SBU increased 26% to
102.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
81.1 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Expressed in
U.S. dollars, operating revenues increased 24% to
$127.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 from $102.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. The increase was primarily due to a
greater demand in the marine acquisition market and to the new
processing centers CGG opened in 2005 in India, Brazil and Libya.
Products
Operating revenues for the Products segment for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 increased 65% to
421.5 million
from
256.0 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Expressed in
U.S. dollars, revenues increased 62% to $524.4 million
from $323.8 million. This strong increase was due to the
successful launch of the Sentinel, the new generation of Marine
solid streamers, and to the continued strong demand for Land
products.
Excluding intra-group sales, operating revenues increased 63% to
352.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
215.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Cost of operations, including depreciation and amortization,
increased 35% to
636.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
473.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. As a
percentage of operating revenues, cost of operations decreased
to 67% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
78% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The
increase in cost of operations was due to increased production
in both Services and Products segments and to significant
after-sales on multi-client surveys that were already fully
depreciated. As a consequence, gross profit increased 136% to
320.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
135.5 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Research and development expenditures, net of government grants,
increased 18% to
27.8 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
23.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 due to
86
development efforts in the Product segment and a lower research
tax credit granted in 2006 to the Services segment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 35% to
86.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
64.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily as
a result of the Exploration Resources integration and the need
to support the significant organic growth. General and
administrative expenses also include the compensation cost,
under IFRS2, of the May 2006 stock-option and free share
allocation plans amounting to
3.9 million.
As a percentage of operating revenues, selling, general and
administrative costs decreased to 9% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 from 11% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005.
CGGs operating income increased to
217.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, from
45.0 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This increase
was due to increases in both the Services and Products segment.
Operating income from the Services segment was
129.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to
14.0 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This increase
was mainly due to a high level of after-sales, high prices in
the exclusive marine acquisition sector, improved use of
CGGs seismic vessels capacity, and the recovery of the
Land SBU.
Operating income from the Products segment was
113.5 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to
49.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, due the
overall high level of sales and improved productivity in Marine
products.
Other revenues were
12.0 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to
net expenses of
2.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Other
revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2006
included primarily the
5.3 million
gain on the sale of 49% of CGG Ardiseis in the Services segment,
a
6.0 million
hedging exchange gain on forward sales of U.S. dollars and
the
1.5 million
gain on the sale of second-hand streamers in the Services
segment.
|
|
|
Financial Income and Expenses, Net |
Cost of financial debt, net decreased 28% to
19.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
26.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, which
included the
9.4 million
financial cost of the early redemption of our remaining
105/8%
bonds due 2007. Excluding this non-recurring item, the cost of
financial debt increased 11% to
19.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, from
17.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
This increase is due to the changes in the structure of
CGGs financial debt from a financial debt during the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 mainly composed of the
$165 million of
71/2% Senior
Notes (issued in April 2005), the 7.75% $85 million
convertible bonds due 2012 (partially converted in November
2005, with the remainder converted in May 2006) and a
$375 million bridge loan facility put in place at the
beginning of September 2005 to acquire Exploration Resources to
a financial debt during the nine months ended September 30,
2006 mainly composed of the $165 million
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 issued in April 2005, with a further fungible
issuance of $165 million in principal amount in January
2006 and a credit facility of $70 million at Exploration
Resources.
The cost of the conversion option embedded in the 7.75%
$85 million convertible bonds due 2012 resulted in an
expense of
23.0 million
with respect to the portion that remained outstanding after
November 2005 for the nine months period ended
September 30, 2006 and an expense of
38.0 million
for the nine months period ended September 30, 2005,
accounted for as Derivative and other expenses on
convertible bonds in the CGG income statement. The expense
is due in 2006 to an increase in the value of the derivative
mainly linked to (i) the increase in the CGG share price in
both periods, (ii) the
1.6 million
premium paid for the early conversion of the remaining
convertible bonds dated May 12, 2006 and (iii) the
0.7 million
write-off of issuance costs on convertible bonds recognized as
an expense at the time of the early conversion.
87
CGG had a
8.4 million
loss in other financial items for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, including a
3.7 million
expense of cost of forward on forward exchange contracts of U.S
dollars compared to a gain of
1.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The remaining
4.7 million
loss was mainly due to foreign exchange difference losses which
were offset by the
6.0 million
gain on forward exchange contracts in U.S. dollars that
qualify for cash-flow hedge treatment, presented as Other
operating income in the income statement.
|
|
|
Equity in Income (Losses) of Investees |
Income from investments accounted for under the equity method
decreased to
8.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
9.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Equity in
income from Argas, our joint venture in Saudi Arabia, decreased
to
9.0 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
9.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Income taxes increased to
54.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from
18.5 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, due to an
increase in CGGs U.S. income tax, linked to the high
level of Marine products sales and after-sales of multi-clients
surveys in the Gulf of Mexico, and due to
5.4 million
deferred tax expense on the French tax group since the remaining
cumulated French carry-forward losses no longer offset the
French net deferred tax liability position at September 30,
2006.
CGG is not subject to a worldwide taxation system and the income
tax paid in foreign countries, mainly based on revenues, does
not generate comparable tax credits in France, its country of
consolidated taxation.
Net Income (Loss)
CGGs net income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 was a profit of
121.0 million,
including a
23.0 million
cost on derivative on convertible bonds, compared to a loss of
27.3 million,
including a
38.0 million
cost on derivative on convertible bonds, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 as a result of the factors
described above.
Year ended December 31, 2005 compared with year ended
December 31, 2004
CGGs consolidated operating revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2005 increased 27% to
869.9 million
from
687.4 million
for 2004. Expressed in U.S dollars, consolidated operating
revenues increased 26% to $1,081.0 million from
$854.8 million.
The increase was attributable to the Services segment,
particularly to the Offshore SBU (which included Exploration
Resources results for part of 2005) and the Land SBU.
88
The following table sets forth CGGs consolidated operating
revenues by activity (excluding intra-group sales), and the
percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented
thereby, during each of the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) | |
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land SBU
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
Offshore SBU
|
|
|
319.5 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
205.7 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
Processing and Reservoir SBU
|
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Services
|
|
|
552.3 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
388.0 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
Products
|
|
|
317.6 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
299.4 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
687.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues for CGGs Services segment (excluding
intra-group sales) for the year ended December 31, 2005
increased 42% to
552.3 million
from
388.0 million
for 2004. Expressed in U.S. dollars, operating revenues
increased 42% to $686.2 million from $482.5 million.
This increase was primarily attributable to the Offshore SBU
(which included Exploration Resources results of
operations from September 1, 2005) and, to a lesser extent,
to the Land SBU.
Land SBU. Operating revenues for CGGs Land SBU for
the year ended December 31, 2005 increased 55% to
119.8 million
from
77.3 million
for 2004. Expressed in U.S. dollars, operating revenues
increased 55% to $148.8 million from $95.8 million.
The increase is principally attributable to weak results in 2004
and reflects a better filling of capacity in this SBU after its
restructuring in 2003, with a strong level of orders spread over
2005.
For 2005, 17 crews on average were in operation compared to 12
crews on average for 2004.
Offshore SBU. Operating revenues for CGGs Offshore
SBU increased 55% to
319.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
205.7 million
for 2004. In U.S. dollar terms, operating revenues
increased 55% to $397.1 million from $256.2 million.
This increase is principally due to: low exclusive sales results
in 2004, with notably low price levels in the first half of
2005; a high level of multi-client survey after-sales in 2005;
and Exploration Resources contribution to operating
revenues from September 1, 2005 of
28.8 million
($35.8 million), which represented 9.0% of operating
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Exclusive sales increased 90% to
185.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to
97.9 million
for 2004. Exclusive contracts accounted for 58% of our
CGGs Offshore sales for the year ended December 31,
2005 compared to 48% for 2004 as CGG shifted more resources
toward exclusive contracts, due to price increases since the
first half of 2004 and as CGG increased capacity in the second
half of 2005 with the upgrade of the vessel Laurentian
and the acquisition of Exploration Resources. Multi-client
data sales increased 24% to
133.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
107.9 million
for 2004 primarily due to a strong level of after-sales.
Pre-commitment sales decreased 7% to
36.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
39.0 million
for 2004 due to a mix of services more oriented towards
exclusive surveys. After-sales increased by 41% to
97.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
68.9 million
for 2004 due to high demand for existing data in the Gulf of
Mexico and Brazil.
Processing and Reservoir SBU. Operating revenues for
CGGs Processing and Reservoir SBU increased 8% to
113.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
105.0 million
for 2004. In U.S. dollar terms, operating revenues
increased 8% to $140.4 million from $130.4 million due
to a dynamic market with strong demand for high quality imagery.
89
Operating revenues for CGGs Products segment for the year
ended December 31, 2005 increased 21% to
378.8 million
from
313.6 million
for 2004. Expressed in U.S. dollar terms, revenues
increased 21% to $468.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 from $389.9 million in the year
ended December 31, 2004. The overall increase was primarily
due to stronger demand for Seal marine recording systems or
system upgrades from various customers including CGGs own
Services segment. Demand for land equipment grew moderately as a
result of an increase in demand during the second half of 2005
following a mild decrease in the first half of the year. The
high demand for marine equipment came largely from CGGs
Services segment in the last quarter of 2005.
Excluding intra-group sales, operating revenues increased 6% to
317.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
299.4 million
for 2004. Expressed in U.S. dollar terms, revenues
excluding intra-group sales increased 6% to $394.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
$372.3 million for 2004, since a large part of Products
sales was dedicated to Services segment, thus eliminated in
consolidation.
Cost of operations, including depreciation and amortization,
increased 21% to
670.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
554.0 million
for 2004, due to broader capacities both in the Services
segment, with an extended offshore fleet, and in the Products
segment. As a percentage of operating revenues, cost of
operations decreased to 77% for the year ended December 31,
2005 from 81% for 2004. Gross profit increased 51% to
201.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
133.8 million
for 2004 for the reasons discussed above.
Depreciation expense increased for the year ended
December 31, 2005 by 16% to
76.3 million
from
65.5 million
for 2004, mainly due to depreciation of Exploration Resources
vessels from September 1, 2005. Multi-client surveys
depreciation was
69.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared with
66.5 million
for 2004.
Research and development expenditures, net of government grants,
increased 8% to
31.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
28.8 million
for 2004 due to new equipment development efforts in CGGs
Products segment. Research and development expenditures in the
Services segment are presented net of a research tax credit of
2.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 16% to
91.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
78.6 million
for 2004. As a percentage of operating revenues, selling,
general and administrative costs decreased to 10% for the year
ended December 31, 2005 compared to 11% for 2004.
Other expenses totaled
4.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to
19.3 million
of other income for 2004.
Other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005
included primarily:
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 million
expense related to the application of CGGs hedging policy
(a
0.9 million
expense in the Services segment, a
3.6 million
expense in the Products segment and a
1.6 million
elimination on hedging on intra-group sales of
equipment); and |
|
|
|
1.0 million
net loss on fixed assets sold or written-off. |
Other income for the year ended December 31, 2004, included
primarily:
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 million
gain on the sale of PGS shares; |
|
|
|
1.8 million
of insurance proceeds related to the seismic vessel the CGG
Mistral (in the Services segment); |
|
|
|
2.2 million
gain on the sale of a building (in the Services
segment); and |
|
|
|
4.5 million
income related to the application of CGGs hedging policy
(in the Products segment). |
90
Operating income increased 64% to
75.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to
45.7 million
for 2004. The increase was principally attributable to
CGGs Services segment.
Operating income from the Services segment was
25.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to a loss of
19.8 million
for 2004. This increase was primarily due to the improved
profitability in the Offshore SBU, which experienced higher
market prices, a higher level of after-sales and greater
capacity following the acquisition of Exploration Resources, and
to the firm recovery of the Land SBU.
Operating income from the Products segment was
79.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to
64.5 million
for 2004. This increase was primarily due to a higher volume of
sales and improved gross margins.
|
|
|
Cost of Financial Debt, Net |
Net cost of financial debt increased 52% to
42.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
27.8 million
2004. This increase was primarily due to the
9.4 million
financial cost of the early redemption of our
105/8%
bonds due 2007 in 2005 and interest and fees of
14.2 million
under our $375 million bridge loan facility used to finance
the acquisition of Exploration Resources.
|
|
|
Variance on derivative on convertible bonds |
The variance in the fair value of the conversion option embedded
in CGGs 7.75% $85 million convertible bonds due 2012
resulted in an aggregate other financial expense of
11.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and of
23.5 million
for 2004.
The increase in the value of the derivative of
11.5 million
includes a
6.3 million
increase related to the 11,475 bonds converted into shares in
November 2005 and a
5.2 million
increase related to the 2,525 bonds remaining outstanding at
December 31, 2005. The increase in the value of the
derivative is mainly due to the strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against the euro and the increase in our share
price, being acknowledged that, as regards the derivative
related to the bonds effectively converted in November 2005, the
value was reduced by the time-component as a result of the
conversion in shares, for an amount of
8.9 million.
Other financial expenses were
14.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to other
financial income of
0.8 million
for 2004. The other financial expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2005 include a
12.6 million
expense related to the early conversion of 11,475 convertible
bonds, which included the premium of $10.4 million
(8.9 million)
paid to the bondholders who converted their bonds and the
write-off of remaining issuance fees of
3.7 million
at the date of conversion.
|
|
|
Equity in Income of Affiliates |
Equity in income of affiliates accounted for under the equity
method increased to
13.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
10.3 million
for 2004. Equity in income from Argas, CGGs joint venture
in Saudi Arabia, increased to
12.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
10.4 million
for 2004.
Income taxes increased to
26.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
10.9 million
for 2004.
The expectation of positive tax results at CMG, CGGs
Mexican subsidiary, (confirmed by the earning of taxable income
in 2005), led CGG at December 31, 2005 to recognize a
deferred tax asset and income of
2.4 million,
representing CMGs net operating loss carryforwards.
Likewise, Sercel Inc.s positive tax planning led CGG in
2004 to recognize a deferred tax asset and income of
10.4 million
representing Sercel Inc.s net operating loss carryforwards.
91
The increase in tax expense, excluding the non-recurring
deferred tax income, is mainly due to higher tax expenses in the
United States and in the United Kingdom due to the increased
revenues in those countries.
CGG is not subject to a worldwide taxation system, and the
income tax paid in foreign countries, primarily based on
revenues, does not generate comparable tax credits in France,
CGGs country of consolidated taxation.
For the year ended December 31, 2005 CGG had a net loss of
7.8 million
compared to a net loss of
6.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
CGGs principal capital needs are for the funding of
ongoing operations, capital expenditures (particularly repairs
and improvements to our seismic vessels), investments in its
multi-client data library and acquisitions (such as, most
recently, Exploration Resources).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, CGGs
net cash provided by operating activities, before changes in
working capital, was
296.0 million
compared to
121.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This increase
is linked to the increase in net income, after elimination of
financial expenses. Changes in working capital for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 had a negative impact of
101.7 million
compared to a negative impact of
11.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, due to high
volume of sales in the month of September 2006.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, CGGs net cash
provided by operating activities, before changes in working
capital, was
204.0 million
compared to
149.7 million
for 2004. This increase was primarily due to the increase in our
operating income. Changes in working capital for the year ended
December 31, 2005 had a negative impact of
21.6 million
compared to a negative impact of
22.8 million
for 2004.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, CGG made
purchases of tangible and intangible assets of
131.3 million
(including
9.9 million
of capitalized development costs), mainly linked to the
conversion of its vessel, the Geo Challenger from a cable
vessel into a 3D seismic vessel and to the equipping of the
Symphony with Sentinel streamers, compared to
67.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (including
5.5 million
capitalized development costs). In addition, CGG entered into
0.2 million
of new capital leases in the nine months ended
September 30, 2006.
CGG also invested
38.9 million
in its multi-client library during the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, primarily in the Gulf of Mexico and
Brazil, compared to
19.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. At
September 30, 2006, the net book value of the CGG marine
multi-client data library was
69.8 million
compared to
93.6 million
at December 31, 2005.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, CGG made purchases
of tangible and intangible assets of
117.1 million
compared to
44.4 million
for 2004. This increase is due primarily to investments in
Exploration Resources vessels, particularly the upgrade of the
C-Orion. In
addition, CGG entered into
17.4 million
of new capital leases primarily related to the vessel
Laurentian for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared with
8.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004.
CGG also invested
32.0 million
in its multi-client library during the year ended
December 31, 2005, primarily for 2D data acquisition in
Libya and depth reprocessing of its existing Gulf of Mexico 3D
library. As at December 31, 2005, the net book value of the
CGG marine multi-client data library was
93.6 million
compared to
124.5 million
as at December 31, 2004 due to intensive depreciation of
surveys linked to high volume of after-sales. CGG invested
51.1 million
in its multi-client library during the year ended
December 31, 2004.
92
In 2005, CGG acquired all of the shares of Exploration Resources
for a net investment of
265.8 million
corresponding to the price it paid for the shares less the cash
held by Exploration Resources at the acquisition date.
Acquisition capital expenditures in 2004 of
27.9 million
consisted primarily of the acquisition of Thales Underwater
Systems for
21.7 million,
Hebei JunFeng Geophysical Co. Ltd for
9.8 million,
Orca Instrumentation for
1.3 million
and Createch Industrie for
1.9 million.
Proceeds from sales of assets in 2004 primarily correspond to
the sale of CGGs PGS shares for
17.2 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 was
69.3 million
compared to net cash provided by financing activities of
232.8 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The amount in
the earlier period results principally from borrowings under
CGGs $375 million bridge loan facility used to
finance the acquisition of Exploration Resources and described
in the paragraph below. In February 2006, CGG issued an
additional $165 million of its
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 first issued in April 2005 and CGG used the net
proceeds from the additional notes primarily to repay the
$140.3 million remaining outstanding under its
$375 million bridge loan facility used to finance the
acquisition of Exploration Resources. In March 2006, CGG
concluded an asset financing agreement for $26.5 million
with a bank, which was fully drawn at September 30, 2006,
to finance the acquisition of newly-developed Sentinel streamers
for the vessel Symphony. In March 2006, Exploration
Resources also concluded a credit facility of $70 million,
which was fully drawn since June 2006, to finance the conversion
of the Geo-Challenger from a cable laying vessel to a 3D
seismic vessel and to acquire seismic equipment for the vessels
C-Orion and Geo-Challenger.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2005 was
193.4 million,
resulting principally from CGGs $375 million bridge
loan facility entered on September 1, 2005 used to finance
the acquisition of Exploration Resources. This bridge facility
was drawn in the amount of $375 million in October 2005,
then partially repaid on December 23, 2005 in the amount of
$235 million with the proceeds of CGGs share capital
increase on December 16, 2005 of
118.9 million
($140.3 million). The bridge facility remained drawn as at
December 31, 2005. CGG also redeemed its outstanding
105/8% senior
notes due 2007 prior to maturity in aggregate principal amount
of $225 million ($75 million on January 26, 2005
and $150 million on May 31, 2005) and issued
$165 million aggregate principal amount of
71/2% senior
notes due 2015 on April 28, 2005.
Net Debt
Net debt was
273.0 million
as at September 30, 2006 and
297.2 million
as at December 31, 2005. The ratio of net debt to equity
decreased to 32% at September 30, 2006 from 43% at
December 31, 2005.
Net debt was
297.2 million
as at December 31, 2005 and
121.8 million
as at December 31, 2004. The ratio of net debt to equity
increased to 43% as at December 31, 2005 from 31% as at
December 31, 2004. Excluding foreign exchange rate effect,
the increase in net debt was mainly related to the Exploration
Resources acquisition, corresponding approximately to the
sum of the acquired debt and the debt incurred for the
acquisition of the shares of Exploration Resources.
Net debt is the amount of bank overdrafts, plus
current portion of financial debt, plus financial debt, less
cash and cash equivalents. Net debt is presented as additional
information because our senior facilities require us to respect
a maximum ratio of net debt to ORBDA. We expect the French
revolving facility to have similar covenants relating to ORBDA.
The maximum permitted ratio of net debt to ORBDA under the
senior facilities is 2.25 to 1.0 for the 12-month periods ending
on the last day of each quarter of the year ending
December 31, 2007, 2.00 to 1.0 for the 12-month periods
ending on the last day of each quarter of the year ending
December 31, 2008, 1.75 to 1.0 for the 12-month periods
ending on the last day of each quarter of the year ending
December 31, 2009 and 1.50 to 1.0 for the 12-month periods
ending on the last day of each quarter
93
thereafter. See Description of Certain
Indebtedness Senior Facilities. If we fail to
meet these ratios and do not obtain waivers, we may be unable to
borrow under such facility and may be compelled to repay amounts
outstanding thereunder. Either the inability to borrow or the
requirement to repay borrowed sums may have a negative effect on
our liquidity and, consequently, may increase our vulnerability
to general adverse economic and industry trends or limit our
flexibility in adapting to such trends. Net debt is not a
measure of financial performance under IFRS or U.S. GAAP
and should not be considered as an alternative to any other
measures of performance derived in accordance with IFRS or
U.S. GAAP. The following table presents a reconciliation of
net debt to financing items of the balance sheet as at the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, | |
|
As at December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Current portion of financial debt
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
357.5 |
|
|
|
157.9 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
Financial debt
|
|
|
386.8 |
|
|
|
265.4 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
176.5 |
|
Less cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(168.7 |
) |
|
|
(138.1 |
) |
|
|
(112.4 |
) |
|
|
(130.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt
|
|
|
273.0 |
|
|
|
500.5 |
|
|
|
297.2 |
|
|
|
121.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
CGGs ability to compete effectively and maintain a
significant market position in its industry depends to a
substantial extent upon its continued technological innovation.
CGG has focused on rationalizing its research and development
activities both to reduce costs and to focus its research and
development efforts primarily on reservoir characterization,
multi-component seabed seismic processing techniques, structural
imaging and advanced seismic recording equipment. CGGs
research and development teams, totaling 320 employees, are
divided among operating divisions. Sercel has strong research
capabilities, especially in underwater acoustic transmission,
oceanographic metrology and borehole electronics for area
studies. CGG also accesses new sources of information or
technology by entering into strategic alliances with equipment
manufacturers, oil and gas companies, universities, such as
Bergen university, or other clients or by acquiring technology
under license from others. CGG has historically entered into and
continue to pursue common research programs with the Institut
Français du Pétrole, an agency of the French
government.
While the market for CGGs products and services is subject
to continual and rapid technological changes, development cycles
from initial conception through introduction can extend over
several years. CGGs efforts have resulted in the
development of numerous inventions, new processes and
techniques, many of which have been incorporated as improvements
to its product lines. During 2004 and 2005, CGGs research
and development expenditures incurred (including capitalized
costs and excluding grants received) were
35.5 million,
and
43.5 million,
respectively, of which 5.6%, and 3.9%, respectively, was funded
by French governmental research entities, such as the Fonds
de Soutien aux Hydrocarbures (which funding is to be repaid
to such organizations from sales of products or services
developed with such funds).
CGG budgeted
45.0 million
for research and development expenditures in 2006, including
both expensed and capitalized costs.
Trend information
Certain changes in operating revenues set forth in
U.S. dollars in this prospectus were derived by translating
revenues recorded in euros at the average rate for the relevant
period. Such information is presented in light of the fact that
most of CGGs revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars
while its consolidated financial statements are presented in
euros. Such changes are presented only in order to assist in an
understanding of CGGs operating revenues but are not part
of its reported financial statements and may not be indicative
of changes in its actual or anticipated operating revenues.
94
As a company that derives a substantial amount of its revenue
from sales internationally, CGG is subject to risks relating to
fluctuations in currency exchange rates. In the year ended
December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, about 90% of
CGGs operating revenues and two-thirds of its operating
expenses were denominated in currencies other than euros. These
included U.S. dollars and, to a significantly lesser
extent, other non-Euro Western European currencies, principally
British pounds and Norwegian kroner. In addition, a significant
portion of CGGs revenues that were invoiced in euros
related to contracts that were effectively priced in
U.S. dollars, as the U.S. dollar often serves as the
reference currency when bidding for contracts to provide
geophysical services.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate of the euro against such other
currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar, have had in the
past and can be expected in future periods to have a significant
effect upon CGGs results of operations. Since CGG
participates in competitive bids for data acquisition contracts
that are denominated in U.S. dollars, an appreciation of
the U.S. dollar against the euro improves its competitive
position against that of other companies whose costs and
expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars. For financial
reporting purposes, such appreciation positively affects
CGGs reported results of operations since
U.S. dollar-denominated earnings that are converted to
euros are stated at an increased value. An appreciation of the
euro against the U.S. dollar has the opposite effect. As a
result, CGGs sales and operating income are exposed to the
effects of fluctuations in the value of the euro versus the
U.S. dollar. In addition, CGGs exposure to
fluctuations in the euro/ U.S. dollar exchange rate has
considerably increased over the last few years due to increased
sales outside of Europe.
CGG attempts to match foreign currency revenues and expenses in
order to balance its net position of receivables and payables
denominated in foreign currencies. For example, charter costs
for its four vessels, as well as its most important computer
hardware leases, are denominated in U.S. dollars.
Nevertheless, during the past five years such dollar-denominated
expenses have not equaled dollar-denominated revenues
principally due to personnel costs payable in euros.
In order to improve the balance of its net position of
receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies, CGG
maintains a portion of its financing in U.S. dollars. At
December 31, 2005 and 2004, CGGs total outstanding
long-term debt denominated in U.S. dollars was
$454.9 million
(385.6 million
at the December 31, 2004 exchange rate) and
$307.8 million
(226.0 million
at the December 31, 2002 exchange rate), respectively,
representing 97% and 92%, respectively, of its total financial
debt outstanding at such dates.
In addition, to be protected against the reduction in value of
future foreign currency cash flows, CGG follows a policy of
selling U.S. dollars forward at average contract maturity
dates that it attempts to match with future net U.S. dollar
cash flows (revenues less costs in U.S. dollars) expected
from firm contract commitments, generally over the ensuing six
months. As at December 31, 2005 and 2004, CGG had
$183.6 million (with a euro equivalent-value of
152.4 million)
and $127.0 million (euro equivalent-value of
101.9 million),
respectively, of notional amounts outstanding under euro/
U.S. dollar forward exchange contracts and other foreign
exchange currency hedging instruments.
CGG does not enter into forward foreign currency exchange
contracts for trading purposes.
Inflation has not had a material effect on CGGs results of
operations during the periods presented. CGG operates in, and
receives payments in the currencies of, certain countries with
historically high levels of inflation, such as Mexico, Brazil
and Venezuela. CGG attempts to limit such risk by, for example,
indexing payments in the local currency against, principally,
the U.S. dollar exchange rate at a certain date to account
for inflation during the contract term.
CGG conducts the majority of its field activities outside of
France and pays taxes on income earned or deemed profits in each
foreign country pursuant to local tax rules and regulations. CGG
does not receive any credit in respect of French taxes for
income taxes paid by foreign branches and subsidiaries. Net tax
expenses in recent periods were attributable to activities,
principally in land acquisition, carried on outside of France.
95
CGG has significant tax loss carryforwards that are available to
offset future taxation on income earned in certain OECD
countries. CGG recognizes tax assets if budget estimates also
indicate enough profits for the following years to use
carryforward losses.
Recently Issued U.S. Accounting Pronouncements
On July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation Number
(FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement 109.
This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an entitys financial statements
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
It prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute
for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or
expected to be taken on a tax return. This interpretation is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. The Group will be required to adopt this interpretation in
the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. Management is currently
evaluating the requirements of FIN 48 and has not yet
determined the impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the Securities Exchange Commission
(SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 addresses the
diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement
misstatements and establishes an approach that requires
quantification of financial statement misstatements based on the
effects of the misstatements on each of the Groups
financial statements and the related disclosures. SAB 108
is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15,
2006. Management currently does not expect that the adoption of
SAB 108 will have a material impact on the Groups
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans. SFAS 158 requires the
employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a
single-employer defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset
or liability in its balance sheet and to recognize changes in
that funded status in the year in which the changes occur
through comprehensive income. SFAS 158 also requires an
employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date
of its year-end balance sheet. SFAS 158 is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. Management
currently does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 158
will have a material impact on the Groups consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
fair value measurement disclosures. SFAS 157 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Group will be required to adopt this
interpretation in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Management is currently evaluating whether adoption of
SFAS 157 will have an impact on the Groups
consolidated financial statements.
Veritas Results of Operations
Three months ended October 31, 2006 compared with three
months ended October 31, 2005
Veritas revenues increased by 37% from $168.7 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 to $230.8 million in
the first quarter of fiscal 2007 as discussed further below.
Multi-client revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 of
$108.3 million increased by $33.8 million, or 45%,
compared to the prior years first fiscal quarter. Land
multi-client and marine multi-client contributed increases of
$17.8 million and $16.0 million, respectively. The
increases in the land multi-client revenue came primarily from
Canada survey sales. Marine survey sales continued to remain
strong globally with particularly good results coming from the
Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea. In addition, Veritas had
significant multi-client sales from Kazakhstan, a new and
promising area for Veritas.
Total contract revenue increased $28.3 million, or 30%,
from the prior years first fiscal quarter with strong
growth from marine acquisition and imaging work from across all
geographic regions. The NASA region
96
continued to see significant growth in revenues from the Gulf of
Mexico area. The land contract business remained strong,
improving from the first quarter results from the prior year
that included a large project in South America.
All of Veritas segments contributed to higher revenue,
which was driven primarily by increases both in multi-client and
contract work. NASA generated a $36.5 million revenue
increase primarily through multi-client land work in Canada,
additional marine acquisition work in the Gulf of Mexico and
increased imaging work. EAME had higher revenue of
$19.5 million coming from all product lines with the most
significant increase in its marine multi client sales. Asia
Pacific continued to experience increases in its marine contract
and imaging work.
Revenue by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended October 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Change | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ thousands, except percentages) | |
NASA
|
|
|
139,294 |
|
|
|
102,842 |
|
|
|
36,452 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
EAME
|
|
|
54,248 |
|
|
|
34,769 |
|
|
|
19,479 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
APAC
|
|
|
32,202 |
|
|
|
26,783 |
|
|
|
5,419 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
VHR
|
|
|
5,087 |
|
|
|
4,284 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
230,831 |
|
|
|
168,678 |
|
|
|
62,153 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by contract type was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended October 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Change | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ thousands, except percentages) | |
Multi-Client:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
43,747 |
|
|
|
25,899 |
|
|
|
17,848 |
|
|
|
69 |
% |
|
Marine
|
|
|
64,549 |
|
|
|
48,558 |
|
|
|
15,991 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Multi-Client
|
|
|
108,296 |
|
|
|
74,457 |
|
|
|
33,839 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
Contract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
48,817 |
|
|
|
47,647 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Marine
|
|
|
73,718 |
|
|
|
46,574 |
|
|
|
27,144 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
Total Contract
|
|
|
122,536 |
|
|
|
94,221 |
|
|
|
28,314 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
230,831 |
|
|
|
168,678 |
|
|
|
62,153 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 of
$37.9 million more than doubled from the $18.3 million
in the prior years first fiscal quarter. The increase in
operating income was primarily due to higher revenue and margins
in both multi-client and contract work. Margin increases were
generated by marine multi-client sales in the Gulf of Mexico,
Canada, North Sea and Kazakhstan.
Operating income included $10.3 million of merger and
related costs. Veritas terminated discussions with a third party
relating to the possible sale of its land seismic acquisition
business, during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The
$10.3 million includes fees in connection with the
termination of those discussions, consisting of amounts paid in
settlement of all claims by the third party buyers and
professional fees, including accounting and legal fees, and
professional fees related to the pending merger with CGG.
Also included in operating income in the first quarter of fiscal
2007 was $2.7 million of depreciation that related to the
land seismic acquisition assets that were previously considered
held for sale during fiscal 2006. Another significant item
within operating income was $1.4 million of professional
fees related to obtaining a
97
significant refund from a foreign taxing authority. The benefit
of the refund was recorded as a reduction of income tax expense,
which is discussed below.
General and administrative expenses increased $2.6 million
from the prior years first fiscal quarter primarily due to
the professional fees incurred related to obtain the tax refund
discussed above and discussed in the income tax section below.
Interest expense increased by $0.7 million from the prior
years first fiscal quarter as a result of increases in the
LIBOR applicable to the $155 million convertible debt.
Interest income increased $3.1 million compared to the
prior years first fiscal quarter due to a higher cash
balance and higher interest rates.
|
|
|
Involuntary conversion of assets |
The company recognized a pre-tax insurance gain of
$2.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 related to
insurance settlements for the equipment loss on the Veritas
Viking experienced in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005.
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
Other income and expense, net consisted of foreign exchange
losses of $0.3 million and other miscellaneous gains of
$0.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. For the
first quarter of fiscal year 2006, other income and expense, net
consisted of $0.9 million of foreign exchange losses and
other miscellaneous gains of $1.0 million.
The companys effective tax rate for the quarter ended
October 31, 2006 was 32%, which is lower than the 35%
U.S. statutory rate and the prior years first quarter
tax rate of 43%. The reduction in the current quarter rate was
attributable to
non-U.S. activities
and a $5.0 million tax benefit related to a refund received
from a foreign taxing authority with respect to certain prior
year tax matters. This reduction was partially offset by a
$3.6 million tax provision related to $10.3 million of
non-deductible merger and related costs.
Year ended July 31, 2006 compared with year ended
July 31, 2005
Revenue for the year was up 30% from $634.0 million in for
the year ended July 31, 2005 to $822.2 million for the
year ended July 31, 2006. The increases for the year came
from all product lines and across all geographic segments.
Increased multi client revenue was driven by strong marine
library sales in the Gulf of Mexico and in Brazil. Multi client
land library sales were more than double from a year ago
primarily due to sales in U.S. and Canada.
Contract revenue for the year ended July 31, 2006 grew
$81.1 million or 21% from the prior fiscal year. Increased
revenue came from both land and marine work. Market conditions
continue to improve and strengthen our business worldwide and
Veritas saw much of the growth in this fiscal year from land
acquisition work in Canada and Alaska as well as increased
imaging revenue across all geographic operating regions. Marine
acquisition revenue remained strong in all geographic regions.
During the year ended July 31, 2006, NASA revenue increased
by $152.8 million. This increase is primarily due to marine
and land multi-client library sales in Canada, Gulf of Mexico
and Brazil. NASA also increased its land acquisition work
primarily in Canada and Alaska. EAME generated most of its
increased revenue through its
98
marine acquisition work. The increased revenue in the APAC
segment came primarily from its marine acquisition work.
Revenue by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Change | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions, except percentages) | |
NASA
|
|
|
541.4 |
|
|
|
388.6 |
|
|
|
152.8 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
EAME
|
|
|
148.7 |
|
|
|
131.0 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
APAC
|
|
|
112.5 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
VHR
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
822.2 |
|
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
188.2 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by contract type was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Change | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions, except percentages) | |
Multi-client:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
109.8 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
101 |
% |
|
Marine
|
|
|
242.3 |
|
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
352.1 |
|
|
|
245.0 |
|
|
|
107.1 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
Contract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
203.1 |
|
|
|
161.6 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
Marine
|
|
|
267.0 |
|
|
|
227.4 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
470.1 |
|
|
|
389.0 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
822.2 |
|
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
188.2 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income of $132.9 million for the year ended
July 31, 2006 was $68.6 million higher than the year
ended July 31, 2005. This performance was driven by
increases in both multi-client revenue and multi-client
operating margins. The overall operating margin was also driven
by increased revenue and margins in land acquisition work due to
increased activity in Canada and Alaska. Operating income was
also benefited by the $2.7 million reduction in
depreciation expense related to the land acquisition assets that
were considered held for sale for the last two months of the
fiscal year. No depreciation expense was recorded during these
two months for these assets. General and administrative expenses
of $43.2 million for the year ended July 31, 2006
increased $11.3 million from the prior fiscal year
primarily due to share-based compensation expense resulting from
the adoption of new accounting rules, increased provision for
performance-based incentive compensation, severance costs, and
non-recurring costs related to the preparation of the potential
sale of the land acquisition business.
|
|
|
Interest expense and interest income |
Interest expense increased by $3.3 million from the prior
fiscal year as a result of increases in LIBOR, which is the
interest rate that the $155.0 million convertible debt is
based upon. Interest income increased $6.7 million compared
to the prior fiscal year due to higher interest rates and a
higher cash balance.
99
|
|
|
Involuntary conversion of assets |
Veritas recognized a pre-tax insurance gain of $2 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 related to insurance
settlements for the equipment loss on the Veritas Viking
experienced in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005. For the
year ended July 31, 2005, Veritas recognized a pre-tax gain
of $9.9 million related to this insurance settlement.
Veritas effective tax rate for the year ended
July 31, 2006 was 41% This rate includes $2.5 million
of additional tax cost associated with a $55 million
one-time repatriation from one of Veritas foreign
subsidiaries pursuant to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, Veritas reversed
$36.9 million of valuation allowances on certain of its
deferred tax assets resulting in a net tax benefit of
$37.3 million for the quarter and $6.8 million for the
full fiscal year.
Year ended July 31, 2005 compared with the year ended
July 31, 2004
Revenue increased by 12% from $564.5 million for the year
ended July 31, 2004 to $634.0 million for the year
ended July 31, 2005. This increase was driven by increased
contract work, primarily marine, in all regions and increased
sales of multi-client data licenses in EAME partially offset by
decreased sales of multi-client data licenses primarily in the
NASA region, which includes the Gulf of Mexico, the United
States, Brazil and Canada. During fiscal 2005, NASA
significantly decreased its land acquisition operations in South
America. NASAs increase in contract marine work was
primarily in the Gulf of Mexico where the Veritas Vantage and
two additional third party vessels acquired a wide azimuth
survey during fiscal 2005. APACs revenue increase was also
generated by marine contract work, as Veritas operated the
Veritas Viking II, the Pacific Sword and Veritas Searcher in
Australia, India, Myanmar and New Zealand during the period.
EAME generated most of its increased revenue through sales of
multi-client data licenses for offshore Africa and the North Sea.
Revenue by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Change | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions, except percentages) | |
NASA
|
|
|
388.6 |
|
|
|
370.9 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
EAME
|
|
|
131.0 |
|
|
|
118.5 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
APAC
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
VHR
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
564.5 |
|
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
Revenue by contract type was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Change | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions, except percentages) | |
Multi-client:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
Marine
|
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
209.1 |
|
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
245.0 |
|
|
|
275.1 |
|
|
|
(30.1 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
Contract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
161.6 |
|
|
|
154.0 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
Marine
|
|
|
227.4 |
|
|
|
135.4 |
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
389.0 |
|
|
|
289.4 |
|
|
|
99.6 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
564.5 |
|
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income increased by $36.4 million from
$27.8 million for the year ended July 31, 2004 to
$64.2 million for the year ended July 31, 2005. During
the first quarter of the year ended July 31, 2004, Veritas
changed its multi-client amortization accounting policy to
include a minimum amortization from the date of survey
completion, instead of only during the last 24 months of
the surveys book life. As a result of this change, Veritas
recorded a charge of $22.1 million in cost of services in
the first quarter of the year ended July 31, 2004. The
remaining $14.3 million increase in operating income for
the year ended July 31, 2004 was the result of increased
margins (revenue less cost of services) of $24.1 million
partially offset by increased research and development costs and
general and administrative costs. Veritas margin increase
was primarily due to its revenue increase and a decrease in cost
of services as a percent of revenue of 2%. Increased
productivity, favorable mix of jobs and higher pricing
contributed to the margin increase.
Research and development costs have increased by
$3.4 million for the year ended July 31, 2004
primarily due to Veritas focus on advanced acquisition and
processing and general increases in research spending. General
and administrative expense increased by $6.4 million due to
the expenses associated with the restatement of Veritas
historical financial statements and those associated with its
increased efforts in the areas of disclosure controls and
procedures and internal control over its financial reporting.
Research and development expense and general and administrative
expense both grew due to increased incentive compensation
related to Veritas improved financial performance.
|
|
|
Interest expense and interest income |
Interest expense decreased from $18.9 million for the year
ended July 31, 2004 to $4.0 million for the year ended
July 31, 2005. This decrease was due primarily to the
issuance of Veritas Convertible Senior Notes in the third
quarter for the year ended July 31, 2004 and the repayment
of its term notes with the proceeds. This refinancing resulted
in a significantly lower interest rate. Veritas
Convertible Senior Notes accrue interest at a rate of three
month LIBOR less 0.75%, which equated to a weighted average
interest rate of 1.72% for fiscal 2005 and is much lower than
the various tranches of debt in place for the year ended
July 31, 2004. In addition, $7.4 million of debt
issuance costs were expensed in fiscal 2004 in connection with
the retirement of the term notes. Interest income increased from
$1.6 million to $5.3 million due to interest earned on
the cash balances.
101
|
|
|
Involuntary conversion of assets |
In January 2005, Veritas seismic vessel Veritas Viking
experienced an engine failure while acquiring data in the Gulf
of Mexico and lost substantial amounts of overboard seismic
equipment. As this seismic equipment was insured at its
replacement cost, Veritas recognized a $9.9 million gain
related to the insurance settlement.
Veritas reversed $36.9 million of valuation allowances on
certain of its deferred tax assets during the fourth quarter of
the year ended July 31, 2005, resulting in a net tax
benefit of $6.8 million for the year ended July 31,
2005. The deferred tax assets were originally reserved at the
end of the year ended July 31, 2003 primarily due to
Veritas historical losses in several tax jurisdictions. As
of the fourth quarter of the year ended July 31, 2005,
Veritas had recognized profits in those jurisdictions and had a
positive operational outlook. The combination of these two
factors was sufficient to cause the reversal of the reserves.
This decrease in provision was offset, in part, by the increased
current tax provision resulting from substantially higher income
for the year ended July 31, 2005. Excluding the release of
valuation allowances, Veritas effective tax rate would
have been 40%. See Note 5 to the Veritas consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for
further information on income taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating activities was $42.7 million
for the first three months of fiscal 2007, which is an increase
from $29.4 million for the first three months of fiscal
2006 primarily due to the increase in net income. Net cash used
by investing activities increased to $99.0 million in the
first three months of fiscal 2007 from $59.4 million in the
first three months of fiscal 2006 primarily due to increased
multi-client library and capital expenditures.
Net cash provided by operating activities was
$336.6 million for the year ended July 31, 2006, which
is consistent with the year ended July 31, 2005 of
$331.3 million. Net cash used by investing activities of
$216.8 million in 2006 was slightly higher than
$206.7 million in 2005 due to the increase in multi-client
library investment and expenditures for property and equipment
partially offset by the receipt of insurance proceeds.
Veritas latest projected cash investments immediately
prior to the merger for the year ended July 31, 2007 amount
to $239.0 million, including $44.0 million for
recurring capital expenditure, $144 million capacity
upgrades and the remainder for vessel upgrades. These figures
may not be representative of the contribution of Veritas to
total CGGVeritas capital expenditures, including pursuant
to the change in IFRS reporting, where, unlike under
U.S. GAAP research and development expenses are
capitalized. See Risk Factors Risks Related to
Our Business The financial statements and other
financial information of Veritas presented in this prospectus
and used to prepare the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information presented in this prospectus and the pro
forma financial information itself may not be indicative of the
results of Veritas as part of our group.
Key factors affecting future results include utilization levels
of acquisition and processing assets and demand for multi-client
library surveys, all of which are driven by Veritas
customers exploration spending and, ultimately, the
underlying commodity prices.
Trend Information
Veritas land acquisition activities are seasonal in
nature. Veritas generally experiences higher revenues in the
second and third quarters of each year due to winter seismic
acquisition seasons in Alaska and Canada.
102
However, performance of large land surveys in South America
or other locations can cause a shift from this pattern.
CGGVeritas Capital Resources
We intend to fund ongoing operations through cash generated by
operations and borrowings under the U.S. revolving facility
and, when signed, the French revolving facility. After giving
effect to the financing transactions we will continue to have
substantial debt service requirements.
The senior facilities consist of a $1 billion term loan
facility with a seven year maturity and the $140 million
U.S. revolving facility with a five year maturity. The
French revolving facility will consist of a $200 million
senior secured revolving facility with a five year maturity.
At the option of Veritas, borrowings under the term loan
facility bear interest at (i) the rate of adjusted LIBOR
plus either 1.75% or 2.00% or (ii) the Alternate Base Rate
plus either 0.75% or 1.00%, in each case depending on the
corporate rating of CGGVeritas by S&P and the corporate
family rating of CGGVeritas by Moodys. At the option of
Veritas, borrowings under the U.S. revolving facility bear
interest at the rate of adjusted LIBOR plus a range from 1.75%
to 2.25% or the Alternate Base Rate plus a range from 0.75% to
1.25%, in each case depending on the corporate rating of
CGGVeritas by S&P and the corporate family rating of
CGGVeritas by Moodys. The Alternate Base Rate is the
higher of Credit Suisses Prime Rate and the Federal Funds
Effective Rate plus
1/2
of 1.0%. The senior credit facilities require us, and the French
revolving facility will require us, to meet minimum ratios of
ORBDA less capital expenditures to total interest costs and
maximum ratios of total net debt to ORBDA. In addition, the
senior credit facilities contain, and the French revolving
facility will contain, certain restrictive covenants which,
among other things, limit our ability to incur additional
indebtedness, pay dividends, make investments, pledge assets,
merge or consolidate, change our business and engage in certain
other activities customarily restricted in such agreements. They
also contain certain customary events of defaults, subject to
grace periods, as appropriate. See Description of Certain
Indebtedness.
Future principal debt payments are expected to be paid out of
cash flows from operations, borrowings under the
U.S. revolving facility and the French revolving facility
and future refinancing of our debt.
The indentures governing the notes offered hereby will also
contain numerous covenants including, among other things,
restrictions on our ability to: incur or guarantee additional
indebtedness; pay dividends or make other equity distributions,
repurchase or redeem equity interests; make investments or other
restricted payments; sell assets or consolidate or merge with or
into other companies; create limitations on the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to make dividends or distributions to
us; engage in transactions with affiliates; and create liens.
Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal, or to pay
the interest or additional interest, if any, on, or to refinance
our indebtedness, or to fund planned capital expenditures will
depend on our future performance, which, to a certain extent, is
subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our
control. Based upon the current level of operations, we believe
that cash flow from operations, available cash and short-term
investments, together with borrowings available under the
U.S. revolving facility and the French revolving facility,
will be adequate to meet our future liquidity needs for the next
12 months. Our assumptions with respect to future costs may not
be correct, and funds available to us from the sources discussed
above may not be sufficient to enable us to service our
indebtedness, including the notes, or cover any shortfall in
funding for any unanticipated expenses. In addition, to the
extent we make future acquisitions, we may require new sources
of funding including additional debt, or equity financing or
some combination thereof. We may not be able to secure
additional sources of funding on favorable terms.
ORBDA (Operating Result Before Depreciation
and Amortization) is defined as operating income (loss)
excluding non-recurring revenues (expenses) plus
depreciation, amortization and additions (deductions) to
valuation allowances of assets and add-back of dividends
received from equity companies. ORBDA is presented
103
as additional information because our senior facilities require
CGGVeritas to respect a maximum ratio of net debt to ORBDA and a
minimum ratio of ORBDA less capital expenditures to total
interest costs. We expect the French revolving facility to have
similar covenants relating to ORBDA. The maximum permitted ratio
of net debt to ORBDA under the senior facilities is 2.25 to 1.0
for the 12-month periods ending on quarters on the last day of
each quarter of the year ending December 31, 2007, 2.00 to
1.0 for the 12-month periods ending on the last day of each
quarter of the year ending December 31, 2008, 1.75 to 1.0
for the 12-month periods ending on the last day of each quarter
in the year ending December 31, 2009 and 1.50 to 1.0 for
the 12-month periods ending on the last day of each quarter
thereafter. The minimum permitted ratio of ORBDA less capital
expenditures to total interest costs under the senior facilities
is 1.50 to 1.0 for the 12-month periods ending on quarters on or
before December 31, 2007, 1.75 to 1.0 for the 12-month
periods ending on December 31, 2008, 2.0 to 1.0 for the
12-month periods ending on December 31, 2009 and 2.5 to 1.0
for the 12-month periods ending thereafter. See
Description of Certain Indebtedness Senior
Facilities. If we fail to meet this ratio and do not
obtain waivers, we may be unable to borrow under such facility
and may be compelled to repay amounts outstanding thereunder.
Either the inability to borrow or the requirement to repay
borrowed sums may have a negative effect on our liquidity and,
consequently, may increase our vulnerability to general adverse
economic and industry trends or limit our flexibility in
adapting to such trends.
In addition, we believe that the presentation of Veritas
ORBDA for the periods presented is useful information for
investors, when considered together with CGGs ORBDA for
the periods presented, to help investors understand what
CGGVeritas ORBDA may have been for the periods presented
prior to the merger. Investors are cautioned, however, that
Veritas historical ORBDA under U.S. GAAP may not be
indicative of Veritas contribution to the ORBDA of
CGGVeritas, including, for example, as a consequence of
differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP and because
CGGVeritas, like CGG, will report its financial results in euro.
See Risk Factors The financial statements and
other financial information of Veritas presented in this
prospectus and used to prepare the unaudited condensed combined
pro forma financial information presented in this prospectus and
the pro forma financial information itself may not be indicative
of the results of Veritas as part of our group. ORBDA is
not a measure of financial performance under IFRS or
U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to
cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity
or an alternative to net income as indicators of our operating
performance or any other measures of performance derived in
accordance with IFRS or U.S. GAAP.
104
The following table presents a reconciliation of ORBDA to
Net cash provided by operating activities for CGG
under IFRS for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months | |
|
|
|
|
ended | |
|
Year ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
ORBDA
|
|
|
359.9 |
|
|
|
148.9 |
|
|
|
229.5 |
|
|
|
172.5 |
|
Other financial income (expense) net
|
|
|
(31.4 |
) |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
Income tax paid
|
|
|
(60.6 |
) |
|
|
(28.1 |
) |
|
|
(31.7 |
) |
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
Non-recurring gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
Increase (decrease) in other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
Income calculated on stock-option
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Less net gain on sale of asset
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
(Increase) decrease in trade accounts and notes receivables
|
|
|
(52.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
|
|
(24.3 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in inventories and work in progress
|
|
|
(28.3 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other current assets
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
17.4 |
|
Increase (decrease) in trade accounts and notes payables
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
Impact of changes in exchange rate
|
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Less variation of current assets allowance included above
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
194.3 |
|
|
|
109.3 |
|
|
|
182.4 |
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
The following table presents a reconciliation of ORBDA to
Net cash provided by operating activities for
Veritas under U.S. GAAP for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended | |
|
|
|
|
October 31, | |
|
Year ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions) | |
ORBDA
|
|
|
123.5 |
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
383.7 |
|
|
|
265.9 |
|
|
|
278.3 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(57.2 |
) |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account receivable
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(62.3 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(34.5 |
) |
|
Materials and supplies inventory
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Accounts payable, deferred revenue, and other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
|
|
(44.5 |
) |
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
69.0 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities (as reported by
Veritas)
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
336.6 |
|
|
|
331.3 |
|
|
|
243.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CGGVeritas Contractual Obligations
CGG
The following table sets forth CGGs contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
|
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Financial
Debt(1)
|
|
|
135.7 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
147.3 |
|
|
|
310.8 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
100.6 |
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
105.9 |
|
Other Long-term Obligations (interest on existing notes)
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
222.6 |
|
|
|
116.1 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
225.4 |
|
|
|
622.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Includes principal due on the existing notes issued on
April 28, 2005 and principal and interest due on bank debt. |
106
The following table sets forth CGGs contractual
obligations as at September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
|
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Financial
Debt(1)
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
256.2 |
|
|
|
363.5 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations (not discounted)
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
|
Other Long-Term Obligations (interest on existing notes)
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
176.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
137.1 |
|
|
|
125.4 |
|
|
|
336.5 |
|
|
|
703.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Includes principal due on the existing notes issued on each of
April 28, 2005 and February 3, 2006 and principal and
interest due on bank debt. |
Veritas
The following table presents Veritas contractual
obligations as at July 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
More than | |
|
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions) | |
Long-term
debt(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
Estimated interest
payments(2)
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
89.9 |
|
|
|
125.4 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
64.9 |
|
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
|
|
222.8 |
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.6 |
|
Potential payments under letters of credit
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Other long-term
liabilities(3)
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
148.9 |
|
|
|
81.0 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
337.0 |
|
|
|
630.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The debt of $155 million has been classified as a current
liability since October 31, 2005 because the stock price
has remained above the level that triggers the convertibility
features of the debt. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest rate on Veritas debt is LIBOR less 0.75% For
purposes of this table, we used Veritas current interest
rate of 4.58% based on a LIBOR of 5.33%. Each 100 basis
point increase in LIBOR will increase our annual interest
expense by $1.55 million per year. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes income tax, deferred revenue, pension and retirement
obligations for which the timing of payment is uncertain. |
In March 2006, Veritas entered into an agreement with a third
party ship owner to charter a vessel currently known as the
Veritas Vision, which is currently being converted for
seismic operations. The term of the charter is for a period of
eight years fixed, with options of up to 10 more years. When
delivered in the first calendar quarter of 2007, the Veritas
Vision will be the seventh seismic vessel in the Veritas
fleet. In addition to the charter, Veritas expects to invest
approximately $60 million to equip the vessel for seismic
operations. Of this expected total, $5 million was spent
during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 and the
remainder is expected to be spent during the fiscal year ending
July 31, 2007.
In September 2006, Veritas entered into an agreement to charter
a seismic vessel, currently known as the Viking Poseidon,
which is currently expected to be in service commencing in the
second calendar quarter of 2007.
107
This vessel will serve as a replacement for the Seisquest
vessel, which is under a charter that expires in May of 2007.
Veritas has also entered into a commitment to purchase
$26 million of recording equipment to upgrade a vessel in
its existing fleet. Substantially all of this amount will be
spent during the fiscal year ending July 31, 2007.
Subsequent to July 31, 2006, Veritas renewed its charter
agreement to extend the charter expiration related to the
Pacific Sword from October 2006 to October 2009.
Pro Forma Combined
The following table presents CGGVeritas contractual
obligations on a pro forma basis as at September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
Pro Forma Combined |
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Financial debt
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
104.8 |
|
|
|
74.9 |
|
|
|
334.4 |
|
|
|
562.0 |
|
Additional notes offered hereby due 2015
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
297.7 |
|
|
|
386.6 |
|
|
Principal(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237.0 |
|
|
|
237.0 |
|
|
Interest(2)
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
149.6 |
|
New notes offered hereby due 2017
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
333.2 |
|
|
|
422.1 |
|
|
Principal(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237.0 |
|
|
|
237.0 |
|
|
Interest(2)
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
|
|
|
185.1 |
|
Term loan facility
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
128.9 |
|
|
|
126.6 |
|
|
|
858.9 |
|
|
|
1,179.8 |
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
750.4 |
|
|
|
789.9 |
|
|
Interest(3)
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
113.1 |
|
|
|
110.8 |
|
|
|
108.5 |
|
|
|
389.9 |
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
68.6 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
89.7 |
|
|
|
363.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
249.7 |
|
|
|
437.6 |
|
|
|
381.6 |
|
|
|
1,914.0 |
|
|
|
2,983.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Assumes $300 million in principal amount of additional
notes offered hereby and $300 million of new notes offered
hereby. |
|
(2) |
Based on an estimated 7.5% interest rate and assuming that the
notes offered hereby were issued on September 30, 2006. A
change in the interest rate on the notes offered hereby by 50
basis points would have changed the total interest cost by
2.4 million
($3.0 million) per year. |
|
(3) |
Based on LIBOR plus a margin of 2% for the term loan facility
corresponding to a 7.3% interest rate. A change in LIBOR by 50
basis points would have changed the total interest cost by
approximately
4.0 million
(approximately $5.0 million per year). |
CGGVeritas Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that
have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future
material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is
material to investors.
108
OUR BUSINESS
We are a leading international provider of geophysical services
and manufacturer of geophysical equipment. We provide
geophysical services principally to oil and gas companies that
use seismic imaging to help explore for, develop and manage oil
and gas reserves by:
|
|
|
|
|
identifying new areas where subsurface conditions are favorable
for the accumulation of oil and gas; |
|
|
|
determining the size and structure of previously identified oil
and gas fields; and |
|
|
|
optimizing development and production of oil and gas reserves
(reservoir management). |
We sell our geophysical equipment primarily to other geophysical
service companies.
On January 12, 2007, CGG acquired Veritas pursuant to the
merger agreement. Upon completion of the merger, CGG was renamed
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas
(abbreviated as CGGVeritas). For a further discussion of the
merger, see The Veritas Merger. On a pro forma
basis, after giving effect to the merger and the financing
transactions, we would have had total revenue of
1,489.1 million and
1,470.1 million and
operating income of
125.7 million and
289.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, respectively under IFRS. See
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information for an illustration of our results of
operations had the merger and the financing transactions
occurred on an earlier date.
Our Strategy
We intend to continue to strengthen our competitive position in
the global geophysical services and products markets by
capitalizing on growth opportunities resulting from both the
application of new technologies in every sector of the oil and
gas business from exploration to production and
reservoir management and from our diversified
geographic presence.
To achieve this objective, we have adopted the following
strategies:
|
|
|
Focus on Growth Areas for Geophysical Services |
We believe that the continued development and enhancement of our
proprietary seismic data recording equipment and software will
help us to remain among the leading providers of 3D land seismic
surveys. We believe that our proprietary equipment and software
provide us with a competitive advantage in specific growth
markets, such as data acquisition in transition zones and
difficult terrain, where recent technological advances have made
seismic acquisition more feasible. We intend to focus on
developing our technological capabilities in emerging markets
for geophysical services, such as reservoir appraisal and
production monitoring. We believe that, due to our extensive
international experience, we also have a competitive advantage
in certain geographic markets such as Europe, Africa, the Middle
East and Latin America, where we have been operating longer than
many of our competitors and where we have developed partnerships
with local seismic acquisition companies in several countries in
these regions. We also believe that we have unique experience
and expertise in complex land acquisition projects.
Our acquisition of Exploration Resources in September 2005
following our previous significant acquisition of marine seismic
assets from Aker Geo in 2001 fits within the strategy we defined
in 1999 to strengthen our position in the marine seismic
segment. In addition, we believe that the combination of CGG and
Veritas has created a strong global pure-play seismic company,
offering a broad range of seismic services, and, through Sercel,
geophysical equipment to the industry across all markets. We
believe the geographic complementarities of CGG and Veritas will
allow us to respond to the growing demand for seismic imaging
and reservoir solutions.
We also intend to maintain our position in the marine seismic
market for non-exclusive data by developing our non-exclusive
data library. We believe that a strong position in this market
segment enhances our global competitive position and may provide
opportunities for continuing future sales. In developing our
non-exclusive data library, we carefully select survey
opportunities in order to maximize our return on investment. In
2005, for example, we carried out several feasibility studies
for permanent seismic monitoring, most notably in Brazilian
109
basins. We also intend to apply the latest advances in depth
imaging technology to a selected part of our existing library.
Given the growing importance of geophysics in reservoir
characterization, we intend to further develop the synergies
between our data processing and reservoir services. This
approach places us in a better position to meet the requirements
of our clients with an extensive range of integrated services.
We also intend to increase our processing capability in
developing disciplines, such as applications relating to
reservoir description and monitoring, including 3D pre-stack
depth imaging, multi-component and 4D studies. We also plan to
continue promoting and developing our dedicated processing
centre services within our clients offices and to develop
our regional centers.
|
|
|
Develop Technological Synergies for Products and
Capitalize on New Generation Equipment |
We believe Sercel is the leading producer of land, marine and
subsea geophysical equipment, particularly in difficult terrain.
We plan to continue developing synergies among the technologies
available within Sercel and to capitalize fully on our position
as a market leader. Through internal expenditures on research
and development, we seek to improve existing products and
maintain an active new product development program in all
segments of the geophysical equipment market (land, marine and
ocean-bottom).
|
|
|
Develop and Utilize Innovative Technology |
We believe that growth in demand for geophysical services will
continue to be driven in part by the development of new
technologies. The industry is increasingly demanding clearer
seismic imaging and better visibility, particularly underneath
salt layers. Recent technologies used to acquire seismic data,
such as the performance of multi-azimuth technologies, enhances
the understanding of complex geological structures. We expect
multi-azimuth, multi-component (3C/4C) surveys and time-lapse
(4D) surveys to become increasingly important for new
production-related applications, particularly in the marine
sector, and expect specialized recording equipment for difficult
terrain to become more important in land seismic data
acquisition, particularly in transition zones and shallow water.
We believe that to remain competitive, geophysical services
companies will need to combine advanced data acquisition
technology with consistently improving processing capacity in
order to reduce further delivery times for seismic services.
We believe that the combined technology and know-how of CGG and
Veritas will strengthen research and development capabilities to
best serve the CGGVeritas client base with a broader range of
technologies that we will be able to deliver more rapidly to the
market.
Our strategy is to take advantage of our leading technology and
our ability to integrate our full range of services to enhance
our position as a market leader in:
|
|
|
|
|
land and transition zone seismic data acquisition systems and
know-how; |
|
|
|
innovative marine or subsea acquisition systems and services; |
|
|
|
seismic data processing and reservoir services; and |
|
|
|
manufacturing of land, marine and subsea data acquisition
equipment. |
In this respect, we intend to continue our high level of
research and development investment to reinforce our
technological leadership.
We believe it is important to operate in close proximity to our
clients to develop a better understanding of their individual
needs and to add measurable value to their business processes.
We respond to these needs by creating new products or product
enhancements that improve the quality of data and reduce the
data delivery time to clients. We believe that our regional
multi-client and dedicated data processing centers in our
clients offices provide us with an advantage in
identifying contract opportunities, optimizing service to
clients and developing products responsive to new market
demands, such as seismic techniques applied to reservoir
management. We
110
believe that we are well positioned to benefit from the industry
trend towards increased outsourcing that is leading oil and gas
companies to place greater emphasis on relationships and service
quality, including health, safety and protection of the
environment, in their selection of third party service
providers, including geophysical services providers. We plan to
continue implementing our strategy toward client service through:
|
|
|
|
|
tailoring our data acquisition operations to meet specific
client demands; |
|
|
|
expanding regional multi-client and dedicated
on-site processing
centers; |
|
|
|
recruiting and training customer-oriented service staff; |
|
|
|
organizing client training seminars focused on our products and
services; |
|
|
|
developing easy access to our multi-client data library through
the increasing application of
e-business technologies; |
|
|
|
developing corporate contracts with our main clients; and |
|
|
|
gaining access to new data acquisition markets, such as subsea
and newly opening territories. |
|
|
|
Provide Integrated Services |
We are committed to providing clients with a full array of
seismic data services, from acquisition and processing to data
interpretation and management. We believe that integration of
compatible technology and equipment increases the accuracy of
data acquisition and processing, enhances the quality of our
client service and thereby improves productivity in oil and gas
exploration and production. Our clients increasingly seek
integrated solutions to better evaluate known reserves and
improve the ratio of recoverable hydrocarbons from producing
fields. We are continuing to develop our ability to provide
geosciences solutions through a combination of various
exploration and production services, including technical data
management, reservoir characterization and interpretation of
well information.
|
|
|
Exploit Strong Data Libraries |
In addition, we intend to take advantage of the complementary,
recent vintage, well-positioned seismic data libraries of CGG
and Veritas. For example, in the Gulf of Mexico, Veritas
data library is positioned in the Western and Central Gulf while
CGGs data library is in the Central and Eastern Gulf. Data
merging from the CGG and Veritas libraries will provide
potential for cross imaging enhancement and value creation by
applying the latest processing software development to achieve
an optimal image. Onshore, Veritas land library offers
additional potential in North America. Our combined library is a
strength in a market where a global library portfolio is
increasingly attractive to clients.
|
|
|
Develop Reservoir Applications |
Seismic data is currently mainly used by oil and gas companies
for exploration purposes. However, we are progressively
extending our core business towards compiling and analyzing
seismic data of existing reservoirs. Through high-resolution
images and our expertise in 4D seismic and permanent
monitoring, we aim to assist hydrocarbon producers in better
characterizing and predicting the static properties and dynamic
behavior of their reservoirs.
Competition
Most contracts are obtained through a competitive bidding
process, which is standard for the industry in which we operate.
Important factors in awarding contracts include service quality,
technological capacity, performance, reputation, experience of
personnel, customer relations and long-standing relationships,
as well as price. While no single company competes with
CGGVeritas in all of its segments, we are subject to intense
competition with respect to each of our segments. We compete
with large, international companies as well as smaller, local
companies. In addition, we compete with major service providers
and government-sponsored
111
enterprises and affiliates. Some of our competitors operate more
data acquisition crews than we do and have substantially greater
financial and other resources.
The land seismic market is extremely fragmented and
characterized by intense price competition. There are a large
number of seismic companies, mostly small and local, in the land
acquisition and land data processing areas where financial and
technical barriers to entry are minimal. Due to the constantly
changing configurations of seismic crews and the immense numbers
of channels in the market, it is impossible to discuss the
global competition in land acquisition in any quantitative
fashion. The entrance of a significant number of Chinese
competitors seeking to expand their international market share
beginning in 2000 has driven down prices in this sector and
decreased the market share of established participants. In
addition, certain very active services markets, such as China
and Russia, are not practically accessible to international
service providers like us. The most significant service
providers in land are Western Geco and BGP. We believe that
price is the principal basis of competition in this market,
although relationships with local service providers are
important, as is experience in unusual terrain, where high-end
equipment, such as 3-component products, can add value in
certain areas with complex geology. Volume in the land seismic
market increased by almost 20% in 2005 with a positive, but
moderate, impact on market prices.
The offshore sector has four leading participants: Western Geco,
PGS, Fugro and us. From 1999 to mid-2004, the offshore market
experienced excess supply, which put downward pressure on
prices. Because of the high fixed costs in this sector, excess
supply was not reduced by operators but rather channeled into
multi-client libraries. According to a September 15, 2005
report by Enskilda Securities, a third party industry analyst,
there are a total of 60 towed-streamer vessels working in the
world, including 44 3D vessels and 16 2D vessels. With supply
flat since 2003, however, and demand increasing since 2004,
prices have recovered significantly in this market and we have
experienced a continuous increase of exclusive volumes and sales
from the multi-client existing libraries since 2005. In the
multi-client library business, we compete with the full-service
seismic companies mentioned above, as well as with specialty
library companies such as TGS Nopec Geophysical Company ASA and
Seitel Inc.
The processing sector is led by Western Geco and us. This market
is characterized by greater client loyalty than the acquisition
sector, as evidenced by the presence of processing centers on
client premises. Processing capacity has multiplied in recent
years as a result of improvements in computing technology. This
increase in computing power has allowed improved processing and
the use of more complex and accurate algorithms.
Our principal competitor for the manufacture of seismic survey
equipment is Input/ Output Inc. The market for seismic survey
equipment is highly competitive and is characterized by
continual and rapid technological change. We believe that
technology is the principal basis for competition in this
market, as oil and gas companies have increasingly demanded new
equipment for activities such as reservoir management and data
acquisition in difficult terrain. Oil and gas companies have
also become more demanding with regard to the quality of data
acquired. Other competitive factors include price and customer
support services.
Industry Conditions
Overall demand for geophysical services and equipment is
dependent upon spending by oil and gas companies for
exploration, production development and field management
activities. This spending depends in part on present and
expected future oil and gas prices.
We believe that the medium-term outlook for the geophysical
services sector and the demand for the geophysical products is
fundamentally positive for a number of reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Economic growth, particularly in more active regions such as
Asia (notably China, India and Brazil), is generating increased
energy demand and leading to higher energy prices and increased
exploration efforts; |
|
|
|
The need to replace depleting reserves and maximize the recovery
of oil in existing reservoirs should encourage capital
expenditures by companies engaged in exploration and production,
which we expect will benefit the seismic industry; |
112
|
|
|
|
|
The scope of application of geophysical services has
considerably increased over the last several years as a result
of significant research and development efforts. Geophysical
services can now potentially be applied to the entire sequence
of exploration, development and production as opposed to
exploration only. This is particularly true with technologies
such as 4D (time lapse seismic data); and |
|
|
|
Finally, the depth and duration of the contraction in the
geophysical sector between 1999 and 2004 may have increased
awareness among geophysical service providers of the risks
related to market overcapacity. |
We believe that the merger puts us in a strong position to
benefit from these industry conditions. See The Veritas
Merger Merger Rationale.
113
BUSINESS OF CGG
History and Development of the Company
CGG was established in 1931 to market geophysical techniques for
appraising underground geological resources. Since that time, it
has gradually come to specialize in seismic techniques adapted
to exploration for and production of oil and gas, while
continuing to carry on other geophysical activities. CGG is a
société anonyme incorporated under the laws of
the Republic of France and operating under the French Code de
commerce. Its registered office is Tour Maine-Montparnasse,
33 avenue de Maine, BP 191, 75755 Paris CEDEX 15, France.
Its telephone number is (33) 1 64 47 45 00.
Over the course of the last three years, CGG completed numerous
acquisitions and dispositions which are described under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Factors
Affecting CGGVeritas Results of Operations
Acquisitions and Disposals elsewhere in this prospectus.
Business Overview
CGGs operations have historically been organized into two
main segments: Services and Products. Services accounted for 63%
and 64% and Products accounted for 37% and 36% of its
consolidated revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and for the year ended December 31,
2005, respectively. CGG generates revenues (by location of
customers) on a worldwide basis. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, 33% of its consolidated revenues were
from the Americas, 33% from the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific
region, 24% from Europe and CIS, and 10% from Africa. For the
year ended December 31, 2005, 34% of its consolidated
revenues were from the Americas, 34% from the Middle East and
Asia-Pacific region, 22% from Europe and CIS and 10% from Africa.
Operating Revenues Data
The following table sets forth CGGs consolidated operating
revenues by activity, and the percentage of total consolidated
operating revenues represented thereby, for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) | |
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land SBU
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
Offshore SBU
|
|
|
404.1 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
222.3 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
319.5 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
205.7 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
Processing & Reservoir SBU
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Services
|
|
|
603.3 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
391.6 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
552.3 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
388.0 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
Products
|
|
|
352.3 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
215.9 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
317.6 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
299.4 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
607.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
687.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
Revenues by Region (by location of customers) |
The following table sets forth CGGs consolidated operating
revenues by region, and the percentage of total consolidated
operating revenues represented thereby, for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) | |
Americas
|
|
|
314.0 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
178.7 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
291.7 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
207.7 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Asia-Pacific/ Middle East
|
|
|
313.2 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
217.1 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
297.3 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
274.5 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Europe and CIS
|
|
|
229.4 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
138.6 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
138.2 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Africa
|
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
90.6 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
607.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
687.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
CGGs services have historically been organized into the
following three Strategic Business Units (SBUs) for
increased efficiency: Land SBU, Offshore SBU and
Processing & Reservoir SBU. Following the merger,
CGGVeritas intends to organize the services business both into
geographical operating segments for the western and eastern
hemispheres, and into land, offshore and processing &
reservoir business lines.
CGG has established a network of country managers responsible
for promoting its entire spectrum of products and services in
its main markets, focusing on providing comprehensive solutions
to client problems. CGG believes that its capacity to provide
integrated geophysical services is a significant competitive
advantage that will help it to implement all components of its
strategy.
Land
CGG is a significant land seismic contractor outside North
America, particularly in difficult terrain. At December 31,
2005, it had 12 land crews performing specialized 3D and 2D
seismic surveys, all of which were recording data. Revenues from
its Land SBU accounted for 11% and 14% of CGGs
consolidated operating revenues in 2004 and 2005, respectively
and 10% of its consolidated operating revenues for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006.
Land seismic acquisition includes all seismic surveying
techniques where the recording sensor is either in direct
contact with, or in close proximity to, the ground. CGGs
land business line offers integrated services, including the
acquisition and on site processing of seismic data on land, in
transition zones and on the ocean floor (seabed surveys).
Seismic surveying on land is carried out by installing geophones
linked to digital recorders that are used to receive the signals
from reflected acoustical waves. Vibroseismic vehicles are the
preferred method of generating acoustical waves since the
frequency of the waves they emit can be precisely modulated by a
computerized system and is less susceptible to noise or error.
In difficult terrain or transition zones, however, other methods
of generating acoustical waves must be utilized, such as
explosives or air guns.
Seismic surveying in transition zones and on the sea-bed is
carried out by laying cables or other stationary measuring
devices on the ocean floor. Ocean-bottom cables allow seismic
surveys to be conducted in areas not accessible to marine
vessels, such as shallow water or the area around drilling
platforms. Ocean-bottom cables also provide high quality seismic
data because they are in direct contact with the ocean floor.
115
CGGs land seismic crews are equipped with advanced
proprietary equipment and software used in each stage of the
land seismic acquisition process, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the Sercel 408UL seismic data recorders, which feature 24-bit
digital recording technology; |
|
|
|
Geoland quality control software, which is used to verify that
the location of field data points during a survey corresponds to
their theoretical position; |
|
|
|
the Sercel VE 432 vibrator electronic control system, used to
synchronize and verify the emission of acoustical waves by
vibrators; and |
|
|
|
Geocluster software, used for
on-site processing and
quality control of acquired data. |
CGG believes that its proprietary equipment and software enable
it to offer high quality, fully integrated land seismic
services. It has pioneered real-time positioning of geophones
and seismic sources, quality control of positioning during land
surveys, and on-site
processing, which together increase the accuracy and efficiency
of such surveys.
One of the challenges inherent in land acquisition surveys is
gathering data without disrupting environmentally sensitive
zones, such as mountainous regions, tropical forests and swamps
in which such surveys are frequently located. CGG has designed
shallow draft boats and ultra-light drilling equipment to
facilitate operations in such sensitive zones. This equipment
can be transferred safely and rapidly from one area to another.
CGG also works in conjunction with the local community at site
locations, hiring local employees and obtaining necessary local
authorizations to alleviate potential opposition to its
operations.
The difficulty of access to survey sites is a major factor in
determining the number of personnel required to carry out a
survey and the cost of a survey. Fully staffed land or
transition zone areas range in size from 40 to 3,000 members
(principally composed of local employees in the latter case),
and the cost of a survey can range from several hundred thousand
to several million dollars per month, depending on the size of
the team and the type and difficulty of the study.
CGG works closely with its clients to plan surveys in accordance
with their specifications. This provides it with a competitive
advantage in being selected to carry out surveys, whether such
surveys are awarded based on competitive bids or directly
negotiated agreements with clients. CGG regularly conducts land
acquisition surveys for national and international oil companies.
CGG has developed partnerships with local seismic acquisition
companies in several countries (Kazakhstan, Indonesia and
Libya). CGG brings to these partnerships its international
expertise, technical know-how, equipment and experienced key
personnel as needed, while local partners provide their
logistical resources, equipment and knowledge of the environment
and local market.
In Saudi Arabia, CGGs land seismic acquisition activities
are conducted through Arabian Geophysical & Surveying
Co. (Argas), a joint venture owned 49% by us and 51% by TAQA,
its local partner.
In 2003, CGGs land acquisition business unit went through
a period of intense competition that led it to reassess its
presence in certain geographical land acquisition markets and to
launch a restructuring program to substantially lower fixed
costs in its land acquisition unit. This program is now fully
implemented and its land acquisition business has at least
broken even since the second quarter of 2005.
Offshore
CGG provides a full range of 3D marine seismic services,
principally in the Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea and off the
coasts of West Africa and Brazil as well as in the Asia-Pacific
region. The capacity to both acquire and process marine seismic
data is an important element of its overall strategy to maintain
and develop its leading position in marine seismic data
acquisition and processing. CGG expanded its offshore
capabilities substantially in September 2005, when it acquired
Exploration Resources, a Norwegian provider of marine seismic
acquisition services. Revenues from its Offshore SBU accounted
for 30% and 37% of CGGs consolidated operating
116
revenues in 2004 and 2005, respectively, with Exploration
Resources included in its results for the last four months of
2005. Revenues from its Offshore SBU accounted for 42% of
CGGs consolidated operating revenues in the nine months
ended September 30, 2006.
Marine seismic surveys are conducted through the deployment of
submersible cables (streamers) and acoustic sources
(airguns) from marine vessels. Such streamers are each up
to 10 kilometers long and carry hydrophone groups normally
spaced 12.5 meters apart along the length of the streamer. The
recording capacity of a vessel is dependent upon the number of
streamers it tows and the number of acoustic sources it carries,
as well as the configuration of its data recording system. By
increasing the number of streamers and acoustic sources used, a
marine seismic operator can perform large surveys more rapidly
and efficiently.
Through its subsidiary, Exploration Resources, CGG provides
marine seismic services to the global oil and gas industry with
a focus on towed seismic data acquisition, multi-client seismic
services and 4C/4D seabed operations. Exploration
Resources activities consist of delivering 2D and 3D
seismic surveys, as well as seabed surveys through its
subsidiary Multiwave.
Each of the six seismic acquisition vessels CGG operated prior
to the Exploration Resources acquisition is equipped with modern
integrated equipment and software and has the capacity to
conduct 3D surveys. CGGs vessels can deploy between six
and 10 streamers up to 10 kilometers long and are equipped with
on board processing capability. In September 2005, CGG expanded
its capacity from five seismic vessels to six with a
technological upgrade of one of its source vessels, the
Laurentian, into a 3D seismic vessel. CGG owns two of its
vessels and operates the other four through time charters.
Exploration Resources owns three seismic vessels equipped for 2D
studies (Princess, Duke and Venturer) and two
vessels equipped for 3D studies (C-Orion and
Search). In addition, it charters the Geo Challenger,
a cable vessel converted to 3D in 2006, on a long-term basis
and the Pacific Titan, a vessel equipped for 2D studies,
on a short-term basis. Search was chartered to TGS Nopec
under a contract until October 29, 2006. The 2D vessels
Princess, Duke and Venturer were partly chartered
until April 2006 to Fugro Geoteam, a subsidiary of Fugro N.V.,
as part of a strategic alliance with Exploration Resources
existing prior to CGGs acquisition. These vessels have now
become part of our fleet. In this framework, the parties agreed
that Exploration Resources would supply the vessel, marine crew,
technical support, insurance and seismic equipment, while Fugro
Geoteam supplied the geophysical services, seismic personnel and
operational support. Profits were then divided, with Exploration
Resources receiving 60% to 85% and Fugro Geoteam receiving 15%
to 40%, after agreed deductibles related to operational and
capital costs.
The C-Orion was launched as a 3D vessel with eight
streamers in early 2006 and the Geo Challenger will be
converted to a 3D vessel with twelve streamers in the first half
of 2006, increasing to nine the number of CGG vessels with 3D
capability. The four remaining 2D vessels will be used for 2D
surveys or, where possible, as source vessels for more complex
operations, which have higher margins, such as for 4D,
high-resolution, and wide azimuth.
The additional vessels increase CGGs fleet management
flexibility considerably. For instance, when demand for
exclusive surveys increases (as is currently the case), CGG is
able to meet demand while continuing to devote a portion of its
fleet to enhancing its multi-client library. With more vessels,
CGG also increases its geographical coverage and can minimize
unproductive time by reducing vessels transit between
areas of operation.
In addition to the seven vessels that are part of the
Exploration Resources fleet, CGG operates six vessels, of which
it owns two, it operates two under renewable time charters with
Louis Dreyfus Armateurs (LDA), one of the largest
shipowners in France, it operates one under time charter
indirectly in partnership with LDA, and it operates one under
time charter with Tech Marine International Ltd.
(TMI). Time charters allow CGG to change vessels in
order to keep pace with market developments and provide it with
the security of continued access to vessels without the
significant investment required for ownership. LDA and TMI also
supply crews for the three vessels each (other than persons
directly involved in seismic data acquisition and ship
management).
117
Rieber Shipping AS, one of the largest ship managers in Norway,
undertakes the ship management of the Exploration Resources
fleet.
Marine seismic acquisition requires advanced navigation
equipment for positioning vessels, acoustic sources and
streamers and specialized techniques for safe and rapid
deployment and retrieval of acoustic sources and streamers. Most
of the vessels operated by CGG are fitted with a full complement
of modern integrated equipment and software, including onboard
computer equipment running CGGs GeovecteurPlus software,
used to process seismic data.
Exploration Resources subsidiary, Multiwave, is a
Norwegian seismic company specializing in seabed seismic
operations and electromagnetic seabed logging (EM
SBL). Seabed seismic generally is a more recent process
than towed seismic and generally does not compete with towed
seismic. Seabed seismic operations are most often used in areas
where conventional streamer acquisition is impossible. The
method can also be more effective in certain types of seismic
applications, such as the monitoring of existing production
fields to optimize reservoir recovery rates. Seabed seismic
collection is based on laying recording cables on the seabed
either permanently or as a mobile system that can be re-used in
other areas. The data collection may take place through multiple
components (3C) adapted to seabed environments, resulting in
greater accuracy than conventional towed seismic, or through
permanent systems that permit continuous monitoring over time
(4C/4D).
EM SBL is a complementary data acquisition method allowing for
remote identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater
areas. There are only two independent providers of this patented
technology, ElectroMagnetic GeoServices and OHM. Multiwave has a
service agreement with ElectroMagnetic GeoServices for EM SBL
projects.
The market for seabed services is still developing, and CGG has
until now had limited experience in it. By acquiring Exploration
Resources, however, CGG has obtained strong know-how and
experience in the fields of seabed seismic and EM SBL. CGG will
continue to offer these services under the Multiwave name.
Exclusive contract surveys generally provide for CGG to be paid
a fixed fee per square kilometer of data acquired. When CGG
acquires marine seismic data on an exclusive basis, the customer
directs the scope and extent of the survey and retains ownership
of the data obtained. In regions where there is extensive
petroleum exploration, such as Brazil, the Gulf of Mexico, West
Africa, the Mediterranean Sea and the North Sea, CGG also
undertakes multi-client (or non-exclusive) surveys whereby it
retains ownership of the seismic data. This enables it to
provide multiple companies access to the data by way of license.
As a result, CGG has the potential to obtain multiple and higher
revenues, while its customers who license the data have the
opportunity to pay lower prices. Exploration Resources also
regularly conducted non-exclusive surveys that could later be
sold to one or more customers. Exploration Resources
multi-client library represented close to 111,000 kilometers of
2D data at the time of acquisition.
CGGs policy is generally to require a minimum share of the
estimated cost of each multi-client survey to be covered by
pre-commitments from clients prior to commencement. CGG treats
these multi-client projects as investments. In determining
whether to undertake multi-client surveys, it considers factors
that include the availability of initial participants to
underwrite a share of the costs to acquire such data, the
location to be surveyed, the probability and timing of any
future lease concessions and development activity in the area
and the availability, quality and price of competing data. Once
the surveys are completed, CGGs customers may license the
resulting data through after-sales.
Non-exclusive survey production accounted for approximately 17%
of CGGs fleet utilization in the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 compared to 5% in 2005 and 15% in 2004.
The decrease in 2005 as compared to 2004 was primarily due to a
result of sharply increased demand for exclusive surveys in 2004
and inadequate fleet capacity. Within the multi-client survey
market, pre-commitment sales have decreased in 2005 while
after-sales have benefited from increased customer demand. For
each year ended 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, CGGs
118
multi-client revenues (both pre-commitments and after-sales)
have exceeded its investments in its multi-client library.
Processing &
Reservoir
CGG provides seismic data processing and reservoir services
through its network of 30 data processing centers and reservoir
teams located around the world. Revenues from its
Processing & Reservoir SBU accounted for 15% of
CGGs consolidated operating revenues in 2004 and for 13%
in 2005, respectively and 11% of its consolidated operating
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
CGGs seismic data processing operations transform seismic
data acquired in the field into 2D cross-sections or 3D images
of the earths subsurface using Geocluster, its proprietary
seismic software. These images are then interpreted by
geophysicists and geologists for use by oil and gas companies in
evaluating prospective areas, selecting drilling sites and
managing producing reservoirs. CGG processes seismic data
acquired by its own land and marine acquisition crews as well as
seismic data acquired by non-affiliated third parties. Marine
seismic data has been a significant source of the growth in
demand for CGGs data processing services and represents
over two-thirds of its operating revenues generated in its
processing centers. In addition, CGG reprocesses previously
processed data using new techniques to improve the quality of
seismic images.
Beyond conventional processing and reprocessing, CGG is also
increasingly involved in reservoir-applied geophysics, an
activity that encompasses large integrated reservoir studies
from reprocessing to full reservoir simulation. It also includes
advanced technology studies such as reservoir characterization,
stratigraphic inversion and stochastic reservoir modeling. In
2001, CGG was awarded contracts to operate dedicated 4D
processing centers for BP and Shell. These contracts have been
regularly extended since then.
While CGGs reservoir teams mainly operate from Houston
(covering South American projects), London and Massy, France, it
also provides seismic data processing (conventional and
reservoir-oriented) services through a large network of
international and regional data processing centers located
around the world. CGG operates six international processing
centers located in Massy, London, Oslo, Houston, Kuala Lumpur
and Calgary. Five of these centers are linked by high-speed
fiber optic connections, and all of CGGs centers have
access to powerful high-performance computers. CGG complements
its network of international centers with regional multi-client
centers and dedicated centers that bring processing facilities
within its clients premises. Sixteen of its data
processing centers are dedicated centers that are
located in CGGs clients offices. CGG believes that
these dedicated centers are responsive to the trend among oil
and gas companies to outsource processing work while providing
its clients with a high level of service. These centers enable
CGGs geoscientists to work directly with clients and
tailor CGGs services to meet individual clients
needs.
The deployment of new technologies developed by CGGs
research and development teams and improved project management
methods have increased its efficiency in time and depth
migrations. The expertise in 4D that CGG acquired in the North
Sea, in particular through its 4D dedicated centers in Aberdeen,
has now been exported to the Gulf of Mexico, where this activity
is growing.
CGGs geographical presence was strengthened in Southeast
Asia with the opening of the Kuala Lumpur hub in 2004, equipped
with new computer facilities, which is becoming one of its major
regional hubs, and is enabling CGG to increase its reach
throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
Each of the principal computers used at CGGs centers is
leased for a period of approximately two years, permitting CGG
to upgrade to more advanced equipment at the time of renewal. In
2005, CGG had more than 10,000 PC clusters worldwide, an average
real-time computer capacity representing more than 65 teraflops,
compared to 40 in 2004, 30 in 2003 and 15 in 2002. CGGs
delivery time has decreased in recent years, enabling delivery
of data to clients within the same timeframe as work performed
directly onboard marine vessels. CGG believes that, with the
combined capacity of its centers located in Massy and London, it
has one of the largest computing capacities of any
privately-owned facility in Europe.
119
CGG competes in the data management market through sales of
PetroVision, a software designed to manage and permit instant
retrieval of large quantities of geological, geophysical, well
and production data.
|
|
|
Processing Software Development and Sales |
CGG sells Geocluster, its proprietary processing software, to
the oil and gas industry as well as to scientific and university
research centers. This software is currently available on most
modern platforms in the market, including Linux platforms.
CGGs other proprietary software products include:
|
|
|
|
|
Geovista, a set of software products used to produce accurate
images of geological structures and showing depth; |
|
|
|
Stratavista, advanced software used to determine specific rock
properties from stratigraphic inversion of seismic data; |
|
|
|
WaveVista, a depth migration service based on wave equations; |
|
|
|
VectorVista, designed to provide greater understanding of
seismic data acquired with multi-component techniques; and |
|
|
|
ChronoVista, a set of software products used to produce accurate
images of geological structures over time. |
Products
CGG conducts its equipment development and production operations
through Sercel and its subsidiaries. CGG believes Sercel is the
market leader in the development and production of seismic
acquisition systems and specialized equipment in the land and
offshore seismic markets. Sercel is operated as an independent
division and makes most of its sales to purchasers other than
CGG. Sercel currently operates eight seismic equipment
manufacturing facilities, located in Nantes, Saint Gaudens and
Toulon in France, Houston, Sydney, Singapore, Alfreton in
England and Calgary. In China, Sercel operates its activities
through Sercel-JunFeng Geophysical Equipment Co Ltd, based in
Hebei (China), in which Sercel acquired a 51% stake in the
capital in 2004 and through Xian-Sercel a manufacturing joint
venture with XPEIC (Xian Petroleum Equipment Industrial
Corporation), in which Sercel holds a 40% interest. In addition,
two sites in Massy and Brest (France) are dedicated to borehole
tools and submarine acoustic instrumentation, respectively.
Revenues from CGGs Products segment accounted for 44% and
36% of its consolidated operating revenues in 2004 and 2005,
respectively and 37% of its revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006.
Sercel offers and supports worldwide a complete range of
geophysical equipment for seismic data acquisition, including
seismic recording equipment and seismic sources, and provides
its clients with integrated solutions. Sercels principal
product line is seismic recording equipment, particularly the
408UL 24-bit recording systems.
In November 1999, Sercel launched the 408UL seismic data
recording system, the 408UL. The 408UL offers greater operating
flexibility than any other previous generation system due to:
|
|
|
|
|
clusters of ultra-light acquisition modules allowing total
flexibility of configuration; |
|
|
|
the option of mixing different communication media (cable,
radio, micro-wave, laser, fiber-optic) to form a true network
allowing the user to define data routing and hence avoid
obstacles in the field; and |
|
|
|
an architecture fully supported by a new generation of
object-oriented software. |
The 408UL is one of the industrys most advanced systems,
and at the end of the year 2005, the installed base reached more
than 785,000 channels. Sercel, seeking to provide users with
systems well-adapted to various
120
environments, developed the 408UL system on the basis of an
upgradeable architecture. In 2002, Sercel expanded its family of
408UL products with the ULS version for transition zone
environment and in 2003 with the digital sensor unit
(DSU) featuring three component digital sensors based on
the MicroElectroMechanicalSystem (MEMS). In November 2005, at
the Society of Exploration Geophysicists convention in Houston,
Sercel announced the launch of 428 XL, the new generation of
land seismic acquisition systems. The 428 XL offers enhanced
possibilities in high density and multi-component land
acquisition.
Sercel is also a market leader for vibroseismic vehicles.
Sercels latest vibrators, called Nomad, offer high
reliability and unique ergonomic features. Nomad is available
with either normal tires or a tracked drive system. The track
drive system allows Nomad vibrators to operate in terrain not
accessible to vehicles with tires. In sand dunes or arctic
conditions this can improve crew productivity. During the
geophysical European congress held in Paris, France on June
2004, Sercel launched the Nomad 90, a geoseismic vehicle that is
capable of exerting a peak force 90,000 pounds.
In addition to recording systems, Sercel develops and produces a
complete range of geophysical equipment for seismic data
acquisition and other ancillary geophysical products as a result
of the acquisition of Mark Products in September 2000, which
specialized in the manufacture of geophones, cables and
connectors. The acquisition of a 51% stake in Sercel-JunFeng
Geophysical Equipment Co Ltd, based in Hebei, China, in January
2004 reinforced CGGs manufacturing capabilities for
geophone, cables and connectors, as well as its presence on the
Chinese seismic market.
The Seal, CGGs marine seismic data recording system,
capitalizes on the 408 architecture and on CGGs many years
of experience in streamer manufacturing. The Seal is the
currently sole system with integrated electronics. Sercel has
recently developed, among other products, an innovative solid
streamer cable for marine seismic data acquisition that is
designed to reduce downtime due to adverse weather conditions
and thereby increase data acquisition productivity. Sercel has
also expanded its marine product range with ocean- bottom cable.
In November 2005, Sercel launched the Sentinel solid streamer, a
new product in its Seal line that is the outcome of the
technological synergies realized in recent acquisitions. Sercel
has already received several firm orders for the new Sentinel.
Sercel significantly expanded its product range and increased
its market share in the seismic equipment industry with the
acquisitions of GeoScience Corporation in December 1999, Mark
Products in 2000 and continued its expansion in 2003 and 2004.
In October 2003, Sercel acquired Sodera S.A., a leading provider
of air gun sources used mainly in marine seismic data
acquisition. In January 2004, Sercel acquired a division of
Thales Underwater Systems Pty Ltd. that develops and
manufactures surface marine seismic acquisition systems,
particularly solid streamers, and seabed marine seismic
acquisition systems. Both Thales seismic equipment
business and Sercel-JunFeng have been consolidated within the
CGG group from January 2004. In addition, through the
acquisitions of Createch and Orca in 2004, Sercel is continuing
its expansion while strengthening its position in two areas with
perceived growth potential: sea-floor seismic systems and
borehole seismic tools.
As a result of these acquisitions, Sercel is a market leader in
the development and production of both marine and land
geophysical equipment. It is a global provider for the seismic
acquisition industry with a balanced industrial position in
terms of both product range and geographical presence.
Seasonality
CGGs land and marine seismic acquisition activities are
seasonal in nature. CGG generally experiences decreased revenues
in the first quarter of each year due to the effects of weather
conditions in the Northern Hemisphere and to the fact that its
principal clients are generally not prepared to fully commit
their annual exploration budget to specific projects during that
period.
CGG has historically experienced higher levels of activity in
its equipment manufacturing operations in the fourth quarter as
its clients seek to fully deploy annual budgeted capital.
121
Intellectual Property
CGG continually seeks the most effective and appropriate
protection for its products, processes and software and, as a
general rule, will file for patent, copyright or other statutory
protection whenever possible. CGGs patents, trademarks,
service marks, copyrights, licenses and technical information
collectively represent a material asset to its business.
However, no single patent, trademark, copyright, license or
piece of technical information is of material importance to its
business when taken as a whole. As at December 31, 2005,
CGG held 144 patents in respect of different products and
processes worldwide. The duration of these patents varies from
four to 20 years, depending upon the date filed and the
duration of protection granted by each country.
Organizational Structure
CGGs principal direct subsidiaries are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of |
|
|
|
% of | |
Subsidiary |
|
organization |
|
Head office | |
|
interest | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Sercel S.A.
|
|
France |
|
|
Carquefou, France |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
CGG Services SA
|
|
France |
|
|
Massy, France |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
CGG Americas, Inc.
|
|
Texas |
|
|
Houston, Texas, United States |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
CGG Marine Resources Norge A/ S
|
|
Norway |
|
|
Hovik, Norway |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Companía Mexicana de Geofisica
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Mexico City, Mexico |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
CGG do Brasil Participaçoes Ltda.
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Exploration Resources ASA
|
|
Norway |
|
|
Oslo, Norway |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Sercel Inc.
|
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
CGGVeritas Services Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
Houston, Texas, United States |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
The following table sets forth certain information as at
December 31, 2005 relating to CGGs principal
properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned/ |
Location |
|
Type of facilities |
|
Size | |
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Paris, France
|
|
Registered offices of CGGVeritas and executive offices for the
group |
|
|
725 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Massy, France
|
|
Registered offices of CGG Services SA |
|
|
9,174 m |
(2) |
|
Owned |
Massy, France
|
|
Data processing center |
|
|
7,371 m |
(2) |
|
Owned |
London, England
|
|
Data processing center |
|
|
2,320 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Redhill, England
|
|
Administrative offices |
|
|
2,095 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
|
|
Offices of CGG Americas, Inc. |
|
|
6,905 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
|
|
Offices and manufacturing premises of Sercel |
|
|
24,154 m |
(2) |
|
Owned |
Cairo, Egypt
|
|
Data processing center |
|
|
2,653 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
|
Data processing center and administrative offices |
|
|
1,152 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Perth, Australia
|
|
Data processing center |
|
|
429 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Calgary, Canada
|
|
Administrative offices and data processing center |
|
|
1,764 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
|
|
Offices of CGG Do Brazil |
|
|
326 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Oslo, Norway
|
|
Data processing center CGG Norge Offices of CGG |
|
|
1,431 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
|
|
Marine Resources Norge A/S |
|
|
243 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Bergen, Norway
|
|
Offices of Exploration Resources AS and Multiwave AS |
|
|
992 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Mexico City, Mexico
|
|
Registered office of CMG |
|
|
570 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Caracas, Venezuela
|
|
Administrative offices |
|
|
315 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
|
|
Processing activities |
|
|
1,394 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Carquefou, France
|
|
Sercel factory. Activities include research and development
relating to, and manufacture of, seismic data recording equipment |
|
|
23,318 m |
(2) |
|
Owned |
Saint Gaudens, France
|
|
Sercel factory. Activities include research and development
relating to, and manufacture of, geophysical cables, mechanical
equipment and borehole seismic tools |
|
|
16,000 m |
(2) |
|
Owned |
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned/ |
Location |
|
Type of facilities |
|
Size | |
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Sydney, Australia
|
|
Activities include research and development relating to, and
manufacture and marketing of, marine streamers |
|
|
7,096 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Xu Shui, China
|
|
Activities include research and development relating to, and
manufacture of geophones |
|
|
59,247 m |
(2) |
|
Leased |
Calgary, Canada
|
|
Manufacture of geophysical cables |
|
|
8,357 m |
(2) |
|
Owned |
Alfreton, England
|
|
Manufacture of geophysical cables |
|
|
5,665 m |
(2) |
|
Owned |
Singapore
|
|
Manufacture of geophysical cables |
|
|
5,595 m |
(2) |
|
Owned |
CGG also leases other offices worldwide to support its
operations. CGG believes that its existing facilities are
adequate to meet its current requirements.
The following table provides certain information concerning the
2D and 3D seismic vessels operated by the Offshore SBU during
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year added | |
|
Charter | |
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Vessel length | |
Vessel Name |
|
Year built | |
|
to fleet | |
|
expires | |
|
2D/3D | |
|
streamers | |
|
(in meters) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CGG Föhn
|
|
|
1985 |
|
|
|
1985 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
3D |
|
|
|
8 |
(1) |
|
|
84.5 |
|
CGG Harmattan
|
|
|
1993 |
|
|
|
1993 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
3D |
|
|
|
8 |
(1) |
|
|
96.5 |
|
CGG Alizé
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
3D |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Laurentian
|
|
|
1983 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
3D |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
84.4 |
|
CGG Amadeus
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3D |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
87.0 |
|
CGG Symphony
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3D |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
120.7 |
|
Search(2)
|
|
|
1982 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3D |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
C-Orion(2)
|
|
|
1979 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3D |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
81.0 |
|
Geo
Challenger(2)
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
3D |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
Princess(2)
|
|
|
1985 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2D |
|
|
|
1-2 |
(3) |
|
|
76.2 |
|
Duke(2)
|
|
|
1983 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2D |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
Venturer(2)
|
|
|
1986 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2D |
|
|
|
1-4 |
(3) |
|
|
89.5 |
|
Pacific
Titan(2)
|
|
|
1982 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2D |
|
|
|
1-4 |
(3) |
|
|
64.5 |
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
In high-resolution mode. |
|
(2) |
Vessel in the Exploration Resources fleet. |
|
(3) |
One streamer if long or multistreamer mode for shorter streamers. |
Environmental Matters and Safety
Our operations are subject to a variety of environmental health
and safety laws. We need to invest financial and managerial
resources to comply with these laws and related permit
requirements. Our failure to do so could result in fines or
penalties, enforcement actions, claims for personal injury or
property damages or obligations to investigate and/or remediate
contamination. Failure to timely obtain the required permits may
also result in crew downtime and operating losses. Moreover, if
applicable environmental, health and safety requirements, or the
interpretation or enforcement thereof, become more stringent in
the future, we could incur capital or operating costs beyond
those currently anticipated. The adoption of laws and
regulations that have the effect of curtailing exploration by
oil and gas companies could also materially adversely affect our
operations by reducing the demand for our geophysical products
and services. CGG is not involved in any significant legal
proceedings concerning environmental matters and is not aware of
any claims or potential liability concerning environmental
matters that could have a material adverse impact on its
business, capital expenditure requirements, earnings or
consolidated financial condition.
123
Legal Proceedings
From time to time CGG is involved in legal proceedings arising
in the normal course of its business. CGG does not expect that
any of these proceedings, either individually or in the
aggregate, will result in a material adverse effect on its
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
On September 29, 2006, CGG, CGGs subsidiary CGG
Services SA and five directors and officers of these entities
were named as defendants in a lawsuit brought by one of the main
labor unions representing CGG employees for violation of French
labor laws. The case relates to the employment by CGG and CGG
Services SA of international staff by a non-French subsidiary of
CGG. Procedural hearings were held in December 2006, and a
hearing on the merits of the case is scheduled for February
2007. CGG is contesting this claim vigorously and does not
expect it to have a material adverse affect on its financial
position or profitability.
On October 20, 2006, a complaint was filed against
CGGs subsidiary, Sercel Inc., in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint
alleges that several of Sercel Inc.s seismic data
acquisition products infringe a U.S. patent allegedly owned
by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs have requested a permanent
injunction prohibiting Sercel Inc. from making, using, selling,
offering for sale or importing the equipment in question into
the United States and have sought an unspecified amount of
damages. Sercel is confident that the products in question do
not infringe any valid claims of the patent at issue and intends
to contest this claim vigorously. While we do not believe this
litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial
position or profitability, the complaint provides limited
information, and the lawsuit is in its early stages.
124
BUSINESS OF VERITAS
Services and Markets
Veritas conducts geophysical surveys on both a contract and a
multi-client basis. When it conducts surveys on a contract
basis, it acquires and processes data for a single client who
pays Veritas to conduct the survey and owns the data Veritas
acquires. When conducting surveys on a multi-client basis,
Veritas acquires and processes data for its own account and
licenses that data and associated products to multiple clients.
The high cost of acquiring and processing geophysical data on an
exclusive basis has prompted many oil and gas companies to
license surveys on a multi-client basis. In response to this
demand, Veritas has built a large library of surveys consisting
of 200,000 line kilometers of 2D data and 210,000 square
kilometers of 3D data. Its marine data library includes surveys
in the Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea, Southeast Asia, West
Africa, North Africa, Canada and Brazil. Veritas land data
library includes surveys in Texas, Mississippi, Oklahoma,
Wyoming and Utah in the United States as well as Alberta and
British Columbia in Canada. The portion of Veritas revenue
generated from the sale of multi-client data licenses is
influenced by a number of factors, including government
licensing of exploration and production rights and as a result,
will fluctuate from year to year.
The following tables describe the Veritas revenue by contract
type and geographic region based on the location of the product
or service provided:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
|
|
October 31, | |
|
Years ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ thousands) | |
Revenue by Contract Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract work
|
|
|
122,536 |
|
|
|
94,221 |
|
|
|
470,132 |
|
|
|
389,046 |
|
|
|
289,404 |
|
Licensing of multi-client data
|
|
|
108,296 |
|
|
|
74,457 |
|
|
|
352,056 |
|
|
|
244,980 |
|
|
|
275,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
230,831 |
|
|
|
168,678 |
|
|
|
822,188 |
|
|
|
634,026 |
|
|
|
564,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended | |
|
|
|
|
October 31, | |
|
Year ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in $ millions, except percentages) | |
Revenue by Region |
Americas
|
|
|
143.4 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
552.4 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
397.8 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
390.6 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Asia Pacific/Middle East
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
138.2 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
124.9 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
81.3 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Europe
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
93.6 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Africa
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
230.8 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
822.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
564.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, 58%, 55% and 57%, respectively,
of Veritas revenue was attributable to
non-U.S. operations
and export sales. See Note 13 to the Veritas consolidated
annual financial statements and Note 4 to Veritas
consolidated interim financial statements for the three months
ended October 31, 2006 included elsewhere in this
prospectus for additional geographic and segment information.
125
Principal Operating Assets
Veritas acquires, processes, interprets and sells geophysical
information utilizing a wide array of assets as follows:
Veritas land acquisition activities are performed with
technologically advanced geophysical equipment. As at
July 31, 2006, Veritas land survey equipment had a
combined recording capacity of 52,000 channels. Veritas
typically deploys equipment in North and South America and Oman
by crews of varying size. Veritas crew count varies widely
as land acquisition is a seasonal activity in many markets,
primarily due to weather. Veritas had an average of 12 crews in
operation in fiscal year 2006.
Veritas land operations include surveying crews, which lay
out the lines to be recorded and mark the sites for shot-hole
placement or equipment location, and recording crews, which use
explosive or mechanical vibrating units to produce acoustic
impulses and use recording units to synchronize the shooting and
capture of the seismic signals via geophones. On a land survey
where explosives are used, the recording crew is supported by
several drill crews, which are typically furnished by third
parties under short-term contracts. Drill crews operate in
advance of the recording crew and bore shallow holes for
explosive charges which, when detonated by the recording crew,
produce the necessary acoustic impulse.
Veritas marine acquisition crews operate from chartered
vessels that have been modified or equipped to its
specifications. All of the vessels utilized are equipped to
perform both 2D and 3D geophysical surveys. During the last
several years, the majority of the marine geophysical data
acquisition services performed by Veritas involved 3D surveys.
The following table contains certain information concerning the
geophysical vessels operated by Veritas as at July 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year entered | |
|
|
|
|
|
Charter |
Vessel |
|
service | |
|
Length | |
|
Beam | |
|
expiration |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Pacific Sword
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
189 feet |
|
|
|
40 feet |
|
|
October
2006(1) |
Seisquest
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
300 feet |
|
|
|
60 feet |
|
|
May
2007(1) |
Veritas Viking
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
305 feet |
|
|
|
72 feet |
|
|
May 2011 |
Veritas Viking II
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
305 feet |
|
|
|
72 feet |
|
|
May 2007 |
Veritas Vantage
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
305 feet |
|
|
|
72 feet |
|
|
April 2010 |
Veritas Voyager
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
220 feet |
|
|
|
52 feet |
|
|
July
2011(1) |
Veritas Searcher
|
|
|
1982 |
|
|
|
217 feet |
|
|
|
44 feet |
|
|
Owned(1) |
Note:
|
|
(1) |
See the following discussions related to various changes in the
status of the charters and the vessels subsequent to
July 31, 2006. |
The Veritas Searcher was sold in August 2006. During July
2006, Veritas chartered the Veritas Voyager to replace
the Veritas Searcher. As at July 31, 2006, the
Veritas Searcher was classified in Veritas balance
sheet as an asset held for sale.
Each vessel is equipped with geophysical recording
instrumentation, digital geophysical streamer cable, cable
location and geophysical data location systems, multiple
navigation systems, and a source control system that controls
the synchronization of the energy source and a firing system
that generates the acoustic impulses. Streamer cables contain
hydrophones that receive the acoustic impulses reflected by
variations in the subsurface strata.
As at October 31, 2006, five of Veritas vessels are
equipped with multiple streamers and multiple energy sources.
These vessels acquire more lines of data with each pass, which
reduces completion time and the acquisition cost. The Veritas
Viking, Veritas Viking II and the Veritas
Vantage are each capable of deploying 12 streamers
simultaneously, although each is currently equipped to tow
eight. The Veritas Viking, Veritas Viking II,
126
Veritas Vantage and Veritas Voyager are equipped
with solid streamers that offer numerous advantages over
fluid-filled streamers. The solid streamers allow these vessels
to work in rougher seas and record more desirable frequencies
with less noise and less downtime than is possible with
fluid-filled streamers.
In March 2006, Veritas entered into an agreement with a third
party ship owner to charter a vessel currently known as the
Veritas Vision, which is currently being converted for
seismic operations. The term of the charter is for a period of
eight years fixed, with options of up to 10 more years. When
delivered in the first calendar quarter of 2007, the Veritas
Vision will be the seventh seismic vessel in the Veritas
fleet. In addition to the charter, Veritas expects to invest
approximately $62 million to equip the vessel for seismic
operations. Of this expected total, $5 million was spent
during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 and the
remainder is expected to be spent during the fiscal year ending
July 31, 2007.
In September 2006, Veritas entered into an letter of intent to
charter a seismic vessel, currently known as the Viking
Poseidon, which is currently expected to be in service
commencing in the second calendar quarter of 2007. This vessel
will serve as a replacement for the Seisquest vessel,
which is under a charter that expires in May of 2007.
Veritas has also entered into a commitment to purchase
$26 million of recording equipment to upgrade a vessel in
its existing fleet. Substantially all of this amount will be
spent during the fiscal year ending July 31, 2007.
Subsequent to July 31, 2006, Veritas renewed its charter
agreement to extend the charter expiration related to the
Pacific Sword from October 2006 to October 2009.
|
|
|
Data Processing and Interpretation |
Veritas operates several data processing centers capable of
processing 2D and 3D data. Most of its data processing services
are performed on 3D seismic data. The centers process data
received from the field, both from Veritas own crews and
from other geophysical companies, to produce an image of the
earths subsurface using proprietary computer software and
techniques. Veritas also reprocesses older geophysical data
using new techniques designed to enhance the quality of the
data. Veritas first data processing center opened in 1966,
and it now has centers in all of its geographic locations.
Veritas processing centers operate high capacity, advanced
technology data processing systems on high-speed cluster CPUs.
These systems run Veritas proprietary data processing
software. The marine and land data acquisition crews have
software compatible with that utilized in the processing
centers, allowing for ease in the movement of data from the
field to the data processing centers. Veritas centers can
generally process both land and marine data and it tailors the
equipment and software deployed in an area to meet the local
market demands.
Veritas operates visualization centers in Houston, Calgary,
Perth, and Crawley. These four centers allow teams of
Veritas customers geoscientists and engineers to
view and interpret large volumes of complex 3D data. The
visualization centers have imaging tools used for advanced
interpretive techniques that enhance the understanding of
regional as well as detailed reservoir geology. These
visualization centers allow Veritas to offer its expertise
combined with the type of collaborative geophysical model
building that is enabling oil companies to explore areas of
complex geology such as the large sub-salt plays in the
deepwater Gulf of Mexico.
Veritas has groups of scientists available to perform advanced
geophysical and geological interpretation on a contract basis.
These experts work around the world, using third party and
Veritas proprietary software to create subsurface models
for its clients and advise its clients on how best to exploit
their reservoirs. Their work is related to exploration as well
as production activities. Additionally, Veritas licenses its
proprietary Hampson-Russell software to companies desiring to do
their own geophysical interpretation.
Technology and Capital Expenditures
Veritas maintains its technological capabilities through
continuing research and development, strategic alliances with
equipment manufacturers, and by acquiring technology from others.
127
Veritas research and development staff includes
scientists, engineers or programmers. Its research and
development efforts focus on new acquisition technologies and
processes and on its core processing and imaging software.
During the fiscal years ended 31 July 2006, 2005 and 2004,
Veritas research and development expenditures were
$22.9 million, $18.9 million and $15.5 million,
respectively.
During the fiscal years ended July, 31 2006, 2005, and 2004,
Veritas capital expenditures for equipment were
$67.9 million, $62.4 million and $30.5 million,
respectively.
During the fiscal years ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
Veritas cash multi-client investment, net of capitalized
depreciation, was $165.6 million, $148.4 million and
$126.3 million, respectively. For the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2007, Veritas is planning to substantially
increase its cash investment in multi-client data to
$240 million.
Significant Customers
Veritas customers include international oil and gas
companies, national oil companies and independent oil and gas
companies. In fiscal 2006, no customer accounted for 10% or more
of Veritas total revenue. A single, large multi-national
oil company represented 12% of Veritas revenue in the
fiscal year ended July 31, 2005. In the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2004, no customer accounted for 10% or more of
Veritas total revenue.
128
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
Under French law, the Board of Directors determines our business
strategy and monitors business implementation. Subject to the
specific powers granted by the ordinary general
shareholders meeting, the Board of Directors is in charge
of conducting our business. Among other things, the Board of
Directors prepares and presents our annual financial statements
to our ordinary general shareholders meeting. Our Board of
Directors currently consists of 12 members elected by our
shareholders. Under French law, a director may be an individual
or a legal entity for which an individual is appointed as
permanent representative.
Our statuts (memorandum and articles of association)
provide that each director is elected for a six-year term by the
ordinary general shareholders meeting. There is no
requirement for directors to be French nationals. According to
French corporate law, a physical person may simultaneously hold
the office of director in no more than five
sociétés anonymes whose registered offices are
located on French territory, subject to certain exceptions. Each
director will be required to own at least 100 of our shares,
beginning on the date of our general shareholders meeting
in 2007 to approve our 2006 financial statements.
Directors are required to comply with applicable law and our
statuts. Under French law, directors are responsible for
actions taken by them that, inter alia, are contrary to
the companys interests and may be held liable for such
actions both individually and jointly with the other directors.
On January 9, 2007, CGGs extraordinary general
meeting of shareholders nominated four Veritas directors
(Thierry Pilenko, former chairman and CEO of Veritas, Terence
Young, David Work, and Loren Carroll) to the board of directors
of CGGVeritas effective January 12, 2007, the effective
time of the merger. Each new director will serve for a term of
six years.
The following table sets forth the names of our current
directors, their positions, the dates of their initial
appointment as directors and the expiration dates of their
current term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initially | |
|
Term | |
Name |
|
Position |
|
appointed | |
|
expires | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Robert
Brunck(1)
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Olivier
Appert(2)
|
|
Director |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Loren Carroll
|
|
Director |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Rémi
Dorval(3)
|
|
Director |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Jean
Dunand(3)
|
|
Director |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Yves
Lesage(3)
|
|
Director |
|
|
1988 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Christian
Marbach(1)
|
|
Director |
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Thierry Pilenko
|
|
Director |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Robert
Semmens(2)(3)
|
|
Director |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Daniel
Valot(2)
|
|
Director |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
David Work
|
|
Director |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Terence Young
|
|
Director |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Member of Strategic Planning Committee. |
|
(2) |
Member of Appointment-Remuneration Committee. |
|
(3) |
Member of Audit Committee. |
Mr. Brunck, 57, has been our Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer since May 1999. Mr. Brunck was our Vice Chairman
and President from September 1998 to May 1999 and was our
President and Chief Operating Officer from February 1995 to
September 1998. Mr. Brunck was Vice President of
Administration and Development from 1991 to 1995 and Chief
Financial Officer from 1989 to 1991. He is a member of the
Supervisory Board of Sercel Holding S.A., Chairman of the Board
of Directors of CGG Americas, Inc., Director
129
of the Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Géologie,
Director of the Bureau of Geological and Mining Research,
Director of the Conservatoire National des Arts et
Métiers, Director of the Groupement des Entreprises
Parapétrolières et Paragazières, Chairman of
Armines and Director of the Institut Français du
Pétrole.
Mr. Appert, 57, has been Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the French Petroleum Institute (Institut
Français du Pétrole, or IFP) since April 2003.
Mr. Appert was President for long-term co-operation and
energy policy analysis within the International Energy Agency
until October 1999. He is also a Director of Technip and of the
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris.
Mr. Carroll, 63, joined our Board of Directors on the
effective date of the merger. Until the merger, Mr. Carroll
had been a director of Veritas since 2003. Mr. Carroll is
currently a financial and strategic business consultant. Until
his retirement in April 2006, Mr. Carroll was President and
Chief Executive Officer of M-I Swaco L.L.C. and was also
Executive Vice President of Smith International, Inc.
Mr. Carroll also serves as a Director of Smith
International, Inc., Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. and Forest Oil
Corporation. Mr. Carroll joined Smith International in
December 1984 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In
January 1988, he was appointed Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Smith International and served in
that capacity until March 1989. Mr. Carroll then rejoined
Smith International in 1992 as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer. Smith International holds a 60%
interest in M-I Swaco L.L.C.
Mr. Dorval, 55, has been Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Soletanche-Bachy Entreprise since June 1997.
Mr. Dorval is Director, Vice Chairman and President of
Solétanche Bachy France, Chairman of Forsol, a Director of
Solétanche S.A., Solmarine, SHPIC, Sol-Expert
International, Sepicos Perfosol, Solétanche Bachy GmbH,
Bachy Soletanche Holdings, Rodio Inc. and Nicholson. He is also
Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SolData and
permanent representative of Solétanche Bachy France in the
economic group SB Mat.
Mr. Dunand, 66, was Financial and Legal Director of ISIS
from 1999 to December 2001 and was Deputy General Manager
Finance (Russia and CIS) of Total Exploration-Production from
1994 to 1999.
Mr. Lesage, 69, has been CGG Honorary Chairman since May
1999. Mr. Lesage was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of CGG from January 1995 to May 1999. He was Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Sogerap from 1994 to 1995.
Mr. Marbach, 69, Ingénieur Général des
Mines, was Advisor to the General Management of
Suez-Lyonnaise des Eaux from 1996 to 2000. Before that time,
Mr. Marbach was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Coflexip and Coflexip Stena Offshore from 1991 to 1996.
Mr. Marbach is a member of the Supervisory Board of
Lagardère, Supervisor of Sofinnova and President of
Oseo-Services, previously the Small and Medium Size Business
Agency (Agence des PME), a private sector group.
Mr. Pilenko, 49, joined our Board of Directors on the
effective date of the merger. Until the merger, Mr. Pilenko
had been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of
Veritas since March 2004. Prior to his appointment and since
2001, Mr. Pilenko had served as Managing Director of
SchlumbergerSema, a Schlumberger Ltd. company located in Paris.
From 1998 to 2001, he was President of Geoquest, another
Schlumberger Ltd. company located in Houston, Texas.
Mr. Pilenko was employed by Schlumberger Ltd. and its
affiliated companies in various parts of the world beginning in
1984 and progressed through a variety of operating positions.
Mr. Pilenko is also a Director of Hercules Offshore, Inc.
Mr. Semmens, 49, is an independent consultant and private
investor. He was co-founder and General Partner of The Beacon
Group LLC from 1993 to 2001. Mr. Semmens is a Member of the
Supervisory Board of Sercel Holding S.A.
Mr. Valot, 62, has been Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Technip since September 1999. Mr. Valot was
President of Total Exploration and Production, and was a member
of the Total Group Executive Committee from 1995 to 1999.
Mr. Valot is Chairman of Technip Italy and a Director of
Technip Far East, IFP, SCOR and SCOR VIE and is a Permanent
Representative of Technip on the Board of Directors of Technip
France.
David F. Work, 61, joined our Board of Directors on the
effective date of the merger. Prior to the merger, Mr. Work
had been a Director of Veritas since 2004. Mr. Work is
currently an oil and gas industry consultant.
130
From 2001 until October 2003, he served as the Chairman of
Energy Virtual Partners, Inc., a privately-held company engaged
in the business of managing under-resourced oil and gas
properties. For more than five years prior to his retirement
from BP Amoco in October 2000, he served in various management
capacities with Amoco and BP Amoco, including Group Vice
President of exploration and, finally, as Regional President in
the United States. Mr. Work currently also serves as a
director of Edge Petroleum Corporation and CrystaTech, Inc.
Terence K. Young, 60, joined our Board of Directors on the
effective date of the merger. Until the merger, Mr. Young
had been a Director of Veritas since 2005. Mr. Young is
currently a professor and head of the Department of Geophysics
at the Colorado School of Mines and has served as such since
2000. From 1983 until 2000, Mr. Young was employed by Mobil
Research and Development Corporation in a variety of roles, the
last of which was as a visiting scholar at the Institute for
Statistics and Its Applications, Carnegie Mellon University.
From 1982 to 1983, he served as a research geophysicist with
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique, from 1979 to
1982, he served as assistant professor, Colorado School of
Mines, and from 1969 to 1974 was a pilot and flight instructor
in the United States Navy.
Under French law and our statuts, the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer has full executive authority to manage our
affairs. The Board of Directors has the power to appoint and
remove, at any time, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Under French law and our statuts, the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, where those functions are exercised by the
same person, has full power to act on our behalf and to
represent us in dealings with third parties, subject only to
(i) the corporate purpose of the company, (ii) those
powers expressly reserved by law to the Board of Directors or
our shareholders and (iii) limitations that the Board of
Directors may resolve, such limitations not being binding on
third parties. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
determines and is responsible for the implementation of the
goals, strategies and budgets for our different businesses,
which are reviewed and monitored by the Board of Directors. In
accordance with French corporate law, our statuts provide
for the election by the Board of Directors of one person to
assume the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer or
the division of such functions between two different persons. In
its session of May 15, 2002, the Board of Directors decided
that Mr. Brunck would assume the position of Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer until the expiry of his term as a
director, unless otherwise decided by the Board. Our
statuts provide that the Board of Directors may appoint
up to five Presidents and Chief Operating Officers
(Directeurs Généraux Délégués)
upon proposal of the Chief Executive Officer, whether or not
this person is also the Chairman of the Board. On
September 7, 2005, our Board of Directors named Thierry Le
Roux and Christophe Pettenati-Auziere to this position.
131
The following table sets forth the names of our current
executive officers who serve as members of our Executive
Committee, their current positions with us and the first dates
as of which they served as our executive officers. We employ our
executive officers under standard employment services agreements
that have no fixed term.
Executive Committee (Comité Exécutif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive | |
Name |
|
Current position |
|
officer since | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Robert Brunck
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
1989 |
|
Thierry Le Roux
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
1995 |
|
Stephane-Paul Frydman
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
Gérard Chambovet
|
|
Senior Executive Vice President, Technology, Planning, Control
and Communication, QHSE, Career Development and Training,
Investor Relations, Communication and Audit |
|
|
1995 |
|
Christophe Pettenati-Auzière
|
|
President, Geophysical Services |
|
|
1997 |
|
Luc Benoît-Cattin
|
|
President Eastern Hemisphere |
|
|
2003 |
|
Timothy Wells
|
|
President Western Hemisphere |
|
|
2007 |
|
Pascal Rouiller
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Sercel Group |
|
|
1997 |
|
Mr. Le Roux, 53, was appointed President and Chief
Operating Officer in January 2007. Before that time, he had been
Group President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2005
and Senior Executive Vice President of our Products segment
since October 1998. Mr. Le Roux was Executive Vice
President of CGGs Geophysical Equipment operations from
March 1995 to October 1998. He was Business Development Manager
from 1992 to 1995 and Far East Manager from 1984 to 1992.
Mr. Le Roux is Chairman of Sercel S.A., Chairman of the
Board of Sercel Inc., Chairman of the Board of Hebei
Sercel-Jungfeng Geophysical Prospecting Equipment Co. Ltd,
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Sercel Holding, a Director
of CGG Americas, Inc., Chairman of the Board of Sercel England,
a Director of Sercel Singapore Private Ltd., a Director of INT.
Inc., permanent representative of Sercel Holding on the Board of
Tronics Microsystems S.A. and a Director of Cybernetix S.A.
Mr. Frydman, 43, was appointed Chief Financial Officer in
January 2007. Before that time, he had been Group Controller,
Treasurer and Deputy Chief Financial Officer since September
2005, Deputy Chief Financial Officer of the CGG Group since
January 2004 and Vice President in charge of corporate financial
affairs reporting to the Chief Financial Officer since December
2002. Prior to joining CGG, Mr. Frydman was an Investor
Officer of Butler Capital Partners, a private equity firm, from
April 2000 to November 2002, and Industrial Advisor to the
French Minister of the Economy and Finances from June 1997 to
March 2000.
Mr. Chambovet, 53, was appointed Senior Executive Vice
President, Technology, Planning, Control and Communication,
QHSE, Career Development and Training, Investor Relations,
Communication and Audit in January 2007. Until that time, he had
been Senior Executive Vice President, Technology,
Planning & Control and Communication since January 2005
and Senior Executive Vice President of our Services segment
since October 1998. Mr. Chambovet was Executive Vice
President of our Acquisition Product line from March 1995 to
October 1998 and was Manager of our data processing center in
Massy, France from 1987 to 1995. Mr. Chambovet is a
director of Argas, Sercel S.A., Sercel Holding S.A. and CGG
Ardiseis.
Mr. Pettenati-Auzière, 54, was appointed President,
Geophysical Services in September 2005 after serving as Senior
Executive Vice President, Services since January 2004. Until
that time, he had been Senior Executive Vice President,
Strategy, Planning and Control since January 2001.
Mr. Pettenati-Auzière was Senior Executive Vice
President of our Offshore SBU from July 1999 to January 2001,
Vice President of Business Development and Investor Relations
from December 1998 to July 1999 and Vice President of Seismic
Acquisition from April 1997 to December 1998. He was Executive
Vice President of International Operations for Coflexip from
1990 to 1996. Mr. Pettenati-Auziere is a Director of CGG
Americas, Inc., a Director and Chairman of the Board of CGG
132
Marine Resources Norge, a member of the Management Committee of
VS Fusion, LLC, a member of the Management Committee of Geomar
and Chairman of the Board of CGG Ardiseis. He is also a director
of BW Offshore.
Mr. Benoît-Cattin, 43, was appointed President of
Eastern Hemisphere Geophysical Services in January 2007. Before
that time, he had been Executive Vice President of our Offshore
SBU division since January 2005, Deputy Vice President
Geophysical Services from January 2004 to December 2004 and Vice
President, Services from June 2002 to December 2003. Prior to
joining CGG, Mr. Benoit-Cattin was Executive Vice President
for oil and heat transfer businesses in the Pechiney Group from
January 1998 to May 2002 and Advisor to the French Minister of
Industry, in charge of energy and nuclear issues from June 1995
to May 1997.
Mr. Rouiller, 53, was appointed Executive Vice President
for Equipment and Chief Executive Officer of Sercel in September
2005 after having served as Chief Operating Officer of the
Sercel Group since December 1999. Mr. Rouiller was Vice
President of our Product segment from October 1995 to December
1999 and Vice President for the Asia-Pacific region from May
1992 to September 1995. Mr. Rouiller is President of the
Management Board of Sercel Holding, Chief Executive Officer of
Sercel SA and Sercel Inc., President of Sercel Canada and
Chairman of the Board of Sercel Australia Pty Ltd.,
Sercel-JunFeng, Sercel
Singapore Pte Ltd., Sercel (Beijing) Technological Services Co
Ltd, Director of Vibration Technology Ltd. and
Xian-Sercel Petroleum
Exploration Instrument Limited Liability Company.
Mr. Wells, 53, was appointed President of Western
Hemisphere Geophysical Services in January 2007. Prior to the
merger, Mr. Wells had been President and Chief Operating
Officer of Veritas DGC, Inc. since 1999. He had been employed by
Veritas for twenty years, having served as president of
Veritas Asia Pacific division, regional manager of North
and South American processing, manager of research and
programming and in various other capacities in North and South
America.
Compensation
The aggregate compensation of our executive officers, including
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and both Presidents,
includes both a fixed element and a bonus element. The bonus due
to the general management for a given fiscal year is paid during
the first semester of the next fiscal year. With this bonus, the
aggregate compensation may substantially vary from one year to
another.
The aggregate compensation as a group of CGGs executive
officers (including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and
both Presidents) who were members of our former Group Management
Committee paid in fiscal year 2005 was
3,026,274,
including the 2005 bonus and benefits in kind but excluding
directors fees. The amount of the bonus of the members of
the former Group Management Committee (except for the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer and both Presidents, for whom
additional criteria are also taken into consideration) depends
upon the achievement of commercial and financial targets for
items such as consolidated net income, operating income and free
cash flow of our various activities and upon satisfaction of
certain individual qualitative objectives.
The aggregate compensation paid to Mr. Brunck, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, in fiscal year 2005 was
288,100 of fixed
compensation and
238,550,
representing his 2004 bonus. The amount of his bonus depends
upon the achievement of commercial and financial targets for
items such as progression of revenues, operating income,
consolidated net income and free cash flow of our various
activities for the considered fiscal year. Evolution of the
market price of CGG shares is also taken into consideration.
Completion of certain individual qualitative objectives is also
part of the bonus calculation. Mr. Brunck was paid his 2005
bonus of 333,000
in the first half of 2006. In addition, Mr. Brunck received
39,216.55 in his
capacity as a director in 2005.
The aggregate compensation of Mr. Thierry Le Roux, Group
President and Chief Financial Officer, in fiscal year 2005 was
288,100 plus a
bonus of 125,000
for fiscal year 2004 paid during the first half of 2005. The
bonus for fiscal year 2005 of
159,000 was paid
during the first half of 2006.
133
The aggregate compensation of Mr. Christophe
Pettenati-Auziere, President of Geophysical Services in fiscal
year 2005 was
288,700 plus a
bonus of 90,000
for fiscal year 2004 paid during the first half of 2005. The
bonus for fiscal year 2005 of
140,700 was paid
during the first half of 2006.
The amount of the Presidents bonus depends upon the
achievement of commercial and financial targets for items such
as progression of revenues, operating income, consolidated net
income and free cash flow of our various activities for the
considered fiscal year. The operational performance of each
segment is taken in consideration, as is the evolution of the
market price of CGG shares. Completion of certain individual
qualitative objectives is also part of the bonus calculation.
In addition to the compensation discussed above, a supplemental
pension and retirement plan for the members of the Group
Management Committee and the Management Board of Sercel was
implemented in December 2004.
Directors as a group received aggregate compensation of
315,000 in
February 2006 for services provided in their capacity as
directors during fiscal year 2005. No amounts were set aside or
accrued by us or our subsidiaries to provide pension, retirement
or similar benefits to directors. Directors service
contracts do not provide for benefits upon termination.
The following table sets forth the amounts CGG and its
subsidiaries paid to directors of CGG, in their capacity as
directors, for the year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount paid to CGG | |
Name |
|
directors for 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in ) | |
Robert
Brunck(1)
|
|
|
39,216.55 |
|
Olivier Appert
|
|
|
24,249.47 |
|
Patrick de la
Chevardière(2)
|
|
|
2,534.64 |
|
Rémi Dorval
|
|
|
23,235.10 |
|
Jean Dunand
|
|
|
35,641.60 |
|
Gérard
Friès(3)
|
|
|
31,355.82 |
|
Yves Lesage
|
|
|
30,879.70 |
|
John J.
MacWilliams(3)
|
|
|
22,564.61 |
|
Christian Marbach
|
|
|
27,777.03 |
|
Robert F.
Semmens(4)
|
|
|
55,183.85 |
|
Andrew
Sheiner(5)
|
|
|
1,775.15 |
|
Daniel Valot
|
|
|
20,586.46 |
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Brunck does not receive any compensation as member of
the Supervisory Board of Sercel Holding or as Chairman of the
Board of Directors of CGG Americas Inc. |
|
(2) |
Resigned from the Board on March 8, 2005. |
|
(3) |
Resigned from the board on January 12, 2007. |
|
(4) |
Includes
40,183.85 paid
by CGG to Mr. Semmens as a director and
15,000 paid by
Sercel Holding to Mr. Semmens as a member of the
Supervisory Board. |
|
(5) |
Resigned from the Board on March 7, 2005. |
As at December 31, 2006, CGG directors and executive
officers held an aggregate of 30,394 ordinary shares of
CGG. As at December 31, 2006, CGG directors and executive
officers held options to purchase an aggregate of
297,334 ordinary shares. As at December 31, 2006, none
of CGGs directors and executive officers held, on an
individual basis, shares and options representing 1% or more of
our outstanding capital.
134
Board Practices
In accordance with the corporate governance standards set forth
in the Bouton Report, we believe that five of our directors do
not have any relationship with CGG, the group or its management
that could impair their freedom of judgment and thus qualify as
independent. Those directors are Mr. Dorval,
Mr. Dunand, Mr. Marbach, Mr. Semmens and
Mr. Valot. We also believe that the position of
Mr. Semmens as a member of the Supervisory Board of our
subsidiary Sercel Holding S.A. does not impair his independence.
Our Board of Directors reviews, on an annual basis, the
qualification of directors as independent pursuant to the Bouton
Report criteria.
The corporate governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange
differ from the regulations and recommendations applicable in
France, especially those governing the definition of director
independence and the role and operation of the Boards
committees. As a
non-U.S. listed
company, we are exempted from many of these corporate governance
rules, which are applicable to U.S. listed companies. For
example, our Board has not formally determined which of its
directors meet NYSE independence standards, and non-management
directors do not meet regularly. Our Appointment-Remuneration
Committee does not consist exclusively of independent directors,
and the Boards internal charter does not address committee
purposes and responsibilities in the manner specified by the
NYSE rules applicable to nominating, compensation and audit
committees. However, our Audit Committee members meet the
independence test for audit committee members established by the
SEC, and we believe that they also meet the definition of
independence under the NYSE rules.
Strategic Planning Committee
The Strategic Planning Committee is responsible for studying our
strategic plans and our planned financial transactions. The
Strategic Planning Committee meets before each Board meeting and
more often if necessary. During 2006, the Strategic Planning
Committee met nine times. The average meeting attendance rate of
committee members was close to 88%.
In 2006, the Strategic Planning Committee was regularly
consulted by management with respect to the merger and was kept
regularly informed of the merger process. The Strategic Planning
Committee was also consulted regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
the proposed acquisition by Sercel of Cybernetix S.A. and
Vibtech; |
|
|
|
the proposed modification of the terms and conditions of the CGG
7.75% subordinated convertible bonds due 2012 before the
modification was proposed to bondholders and
shareholders meetings in April and May 2006, respectively;
and |
|
|
|
the Board performance evaluation. |
The Audit Committee is chaired by Mr. Dunand. The other
members are Mr. Dorval, Mr. Lesage and
Mr. Semmens. The Audit Committee is responsible for
assisting the Board of Directors and undertaking preparatory
work for the Board, particularly by reviewing our financial
statements with management and our statutory auditors.
The principal responsibilities of the Audit Committee are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewing and discussing with management and our statutory
auditors (i) the consistency and appropriateness of the
accounting methods we adopt to prepare our corporate and
consolidated financial statements; (ii) the consolidation
perimeter and requesting, when necessary, all appropriate
explanations; (iii) our draft annual, semi-annual and
quarterly financial statements together with the notes to them,
and especially off-balance sheet arrangements; and (iv) the
quality, comprehensiveness, accuracy and veracity of the
financial statements; |
135
|
|
|
|
|
Receiving reports from our statutory auditors on their review,
including any comments and suggestions they may have made in the
scope of their audit; and |
|
|
|
Raising any financial or accounting question that the Committee
deems important. |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewing our annual report on
Form 20-F and our
Document de Référence filed with
the French securities market regulator. |
|
|
|
In consultation with our statutory auditors, our internal
auditors and management, reviewing the structure of our internal
control procedures and the way in which they operate, notably
those procedures relating to the preparation and treatment of
accounting and financial information used to prepare our
financial statements, to assess and manage risks, to comply with
the principal regulations applicable to us, and to review the
comments and observations made by the statutory auditors on our
internal control procedures. |
|
|
|
With respect to internal audit, reviewing and discuss with
management particularly: |
|
|
|
|
|
its organization and operation, |
|
|
|
its activities and the responsibilities proposed in the scope of
the internal audit plan approved by the general management and
presented to the Audit Committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewing and discussing with management and, when appropriate,
our statutory auditors the transactions directly or indirectly
binding the Group and its executive officers. |
|
|
|
With respect to external audit: |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewing and discussing with the statutory auditors their
annual audit plan, |
|
|
|
Meeting, if necessary, with the statutory auditors outside the
presence of management, |
|
|
|
Ensuring the independence of the statutory auditors by managing
the procedure for selection of the auditors. The Audit Committee
submits its choice to the Board of Directors, which, pursuant to
law, must submit the appointment of auditors to a vote at a
shareholders meeting, |
|
|
|
Discussing the extent and results of the audit work with the
statutory auditors and management and reviewing the amount of
auditors fees regularly with management. The Audit
Committee has sole authority to authorize performance of
non-audit services by our auditors or members of their network. |
|
|
|
|
|
Overseeing the anonymous handling of any report concerning a
possible internal control problem or any problem of an
accounting or financial nature. |
|
|
|
Finally, the management of the company must report to the Audit
Committee any suspected fraud of a significant amount so that
the committee may proceed with any verification that it deems
appropriate. |
Sessions of the Audit Committee are open to the members of the
Executive Committee, the Deputy Chief Financial Officer, our
external auditors (in order to report on their audit reviews)
and the Senior Vice-President in charge of Internal Audit (in
order to review important assignments).
The Audit Committee meets before each Board meeting. In
addition, the members of the Audit Committee are systematically
invited to attend Strategic Committee meetings. During 2006, the
Audit Committee met six times, each time with all members in
attendance.
During 2006, the Audit Committee reviewed drafts of the annual
consolidated financial statements for 2005 and the interim
financial statements for 2006 before those were presented to the
Board and provided to the Board its recommendations concerning
these financial statements. The Audit Committee reviewed the
annual report on
Form 20-F and the
Document de Référence, the proxy
statement dated November 30, 2006 and the French
Note dOpération issued in
connection with the merger before they were published.
136
The Audit Committee examined the work to be performed by the
statutory auditors in the scope of their audit on the 2006
financial statements and approved their fee estimates for this
work. In compliance with the Audit Committees procedures
providing for its prior approval of non-audit services provided
by the members of our auditors network, the Audit
Committee reviewed the services so performed in 2006 and
approved them as necessary.
The Audit Committee reviewed the activities of the internal
audit team, which acts on the basis of a plan established by the
Executive Committee and presented to the Audit Committee. This
plan is established in light of perceived operational and
financial risks and with the goal of systematically reviewing
each Strategic Business Unit every three years.
In addition, the Audit Committee reviewed regularly multi-client
surveys, analyzing in particular the sales average coverage rate
in order to evaluate the fair value of surveys as recorded on
the balance sheet.
The Audit Committee was also kept regularly informed on the
development of the assessment of internal control procedures
pursuant to section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Finally, the Audit Committee reviewed the independence of some
of our directors before the annual determination by the Board of
Directors.
|
|
|
Appointment-Remuneration Committee |
The principal responsibilities of the Appointment-Remuneration
Committee are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
to propose to the Board of Directors: |
|
|
|
the implementation of stock option and performance
share plans and employee shareholding plans; |
|
|
the remuneration of the executive officers
(mandataires sociaux); and |
|
|
the appointment of directors, executive officers
(mandataires sociaux) or members of Board committees. |
|
|
|
|
|
to be kept informed of the remuneration of the members of the
Executive Committee. |
In 2006, this committee met four times, with an average meeting
attendance rate of 83%. The Appointment-Remuneration Committee
met to decide on
|
|
|
|
|
the remuneration of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and
the Presidents, |
|
|
|
the proposal to be subject to the annual general meeting with
respect to stock-options and performance shares and the final
allocation of such performance shares and stock-options to
employees of the Group, |
|
|
|
the protection letters of the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer and the Presidents, |
|
|
|
the proposal to be made to the extraordinary general meeting for
the appointment of the four new directors after completion of
the merger with Veritas, |
|
|
|
the reorganization of the Group Management Committee to be
effective after completion of the merger with Veritas, and |
|
|
|
the implementation of the evaluation process of the Board of
Directors and the Chief Executive Officer. |
Employees
As at December 31, 2006, CGG had approximately
4,500 permanent employees worldwide, as well as several
thousand auxiliary field personnel on temporary contracts. Of
the total, 2,567 were involved in the Services segment and
1,933 in the Products segment. CGG has never experienced a
material work stoppage and considers its relations with its
employees to be good. CGG permanently employs more than 3,000
technicians and persons holding engineering degrees and have
developed a significant in-house training program.
CGGs total workforce has increased from 3,669 at
December 31, 2004 to 3,952 at December 31, 2005 and to
4,500 at December 31, 2006. This increase in the size of
its workforce is mainly attributable to the growth of
137
both its geophysical product and service activities, as well as
its acquisition of Exploration Resources. We are preparing for
the future by improving our management training program, putting
increased emphasis on strengthening the technical and personal
skills of our employees.
During its financial year ended July 31, 2006, Veritas
employed an average of approximately 2,800 people on a full time
basis. The number of Veritas employees varied greatly due to
activity changes in its land acquisition business and during its
financial year ended July 31, 2006 the number of employees
ranged from a low of approximately 2,400 to a high of
approximately 4,300. This variation typically occurred on a
seasonal basis, with higher employee counts and higher revenue
occurring during the second and third fiscal quarters,
coinciding with the winter seismic acquisition seasons in Alaska
and Canada. However, performance of large land surveys in South
America or other locations can cause a marked shift from this
pattern. A total of 31 employees in Singapore are subject to
collective bargaining agreements.
In accordance with French law for employees employed under
French contracts, we, and each of our French subsidiaries have
an Employee Representation Committee (Comité
dEntreprise) consisting of representatives elected by
our employees. The Employee Representation Committee reports
regularly to employees, represents employees in relations with
management, is consulted on significant matters relating to
employee working conditions and is regularly informed of
economic developments.
Share Ownership
In accordance with French law, we are authorized annually by our
shareholders at the extraordinary general meeting to issue
ordinary shares for sale to our employees and employees of our
affiliates who elect to participate in our Group Employee
Savings Plan (Plan dEpargne Entreprise Groupe)
instituted in 1997 (the Group Plan). Our
shareholders, at the extraordinary general meeting held on
May 11, 2006, renewed our authorization to issue up to
1,500,000 ordinary shares in sales to employees and affiliates
who participate in the Group Plan. We may offer ordinary shares
pursuant to the Group Plan at a price neither higher than the
average market price for the 20 business days preceding the date
on which the Board of Directors set the commencement date for
the offering nor lower than 80% of such average market price. As
at December 31, 2006, CGG group employees held
24,550 ordinary shares, corresponding to 0.14% of our share
capital, through the Group Plan.
Pursuant to resolutions adopted by our Board of Directors on
January 18, 2000, March 14, 2001, May 15, 2002,
May 15, 2003 and May 11, 2006, our Board of Directors
has granted options to certain of our employees, executive
officers and directors to subscribe for an aggregate of
997,500 ordinary shares. This total has been adjusted
pursuant to French law and the terms of the options to total
852,812 options. Options with respect to 650,797 ordinary
shares remained outstanding as at December 31, 2006. The
following table sets forth certain information relating to these
stock options plans as at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercised | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ordinary | |
|
outstanding | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
|
Options | |
|
shares) at | |
|
at | |
|
price per | |
|
|
|
|
initially | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
ordinary | |
|
|
Date of board of directors resolution |
|
granted(1) | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006(2) | |
|
share(1) | |
|
Expiration date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
January 18,
2000(3)
|
|
|
231,000 |
|
|
|
181,194 |
|
|
|
39,625 |
|
|
|
45.83 |
|
|
|
January 17, 2008 |
|
March 14,
2001(4)
|
|
|
256,000 |
|
|
|
113,911 |
|
|
|
147,297 |
|
|
|
65.39 |
|
|
|
March 13, 2009 |
|
May 15,
2002(5)
|
|
|
138,100 |
|
|
|
41,896 |
|
|
|
97,214 |
|
|
|
39.92 |
|
|
|
May 14, 2010 |
|
May 15,
2003(6)
|
|
|
169,900 |
|
|
|
15,717 |
|
|
|
164,711 |
|
|
|
14.53 |
|
|
|
May 14, 2011 |
|
May 11,
2006(7)
|
|
|
202,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
201,950 |
|
|
|
131.26 |
|
|
|
May 10, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
997,500 |
|
|
|
187,649 |
|
|
|
650,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Pursuant to French law and the terms of the stock option plans,
the numbers of options granted and the exercise price were
adjusted following our share capital increase in December 2005. |
|
(2) |
The stock option plans provide for the cancellation of the
options if the holder is no longer our employee, director or
executive officer. |
138
|
|
(3) |
Options under the 2000 plan could not be exercised before
January 2003. |
|
(4) |
Options under the 2001 plan vest by one-fifth each year from
March 2001 and could not be exercised before March 14, 2004. |
|
(5) |
Options under the 2002 plan vest by one-fifth each year from May
2002 and could not be exercised before May 16, 2005. |
|
(6) |
Options under the 2003 plan vest by one-fourth each year from
May 2003 and could not be exercised before May 16, 2006. |
|
(7) |
Options under the 2006 plan vest by one-fourth each year from
May 2006 and can be exercised at any time. However resulting
shares cannot be sold before May 12, 2010. |
At the extraordinary general shareholders meeting held on
May 11, 2006, a new stock option plan was approved by
shareholders whereby options to purchase up to 5% of our share
capital outstanding on the date of allocation may be granted in
one or several allocations by the Board of Directors to certain
of our employees and executive officers during the
38-month period
following the plans approval. The Board has allocated
202,500 stock options pursuant to such shareholders
resolution.
At the same extraordinary general shareholders meeting, a
performance share plan was approved by shareholders whereby
performance shares up to 1% of our share capital outstanding on
the date of allocation may be granted in one or several
allocations by the Board of Directors to certain of our
employees and executive officers during the 38-month period
following the plans approval. The Board has allocated
53,200 performance shares pursuant to such shareholders
resolution.
139
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
Major Shareholders
The table below sets forth certain information with respect to
entities known to us or ascertained from public filings to
beneficially own a significant percentage of our voting
securities as at January 25, 2007 and December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 25, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2007 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
% of | |
|
voting | |
|
% of | |
|
voting | |
|
% of | |
|
voting | |
|
% of | |
|
voting | |
|
|
shares | |
|
rights | |
|
shares | |
|
rights | |
|
shares | |
|
rights | |
|
shares | |
|
rights | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Identity of Person or Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Beacon Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.21 |
|
|
|
25.51 |
|
EBPF-Financière de lEchiquier
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
Fidelity International Limited
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
|
|
|
10.77 |
|
|
|
9.97 |
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
|
|
9.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institut Français du Pétrole
|
|
|
5.07 |
|
|
|
9.64 |
|
|
|
7.73 |
|
|
|
14.32 |
|
|
|
8.21 |
|
|
|
15.13 |
|
|
|
12.01 |
|
|
|
12.94 |
|
Public
|
|
|
90.22 |
|
|
|
85.89 |
|
|
|
81.50 |
|
|
|
75.71 |
|
|
|
81.48 |
|
|
|
75.37 |
|
|
|
68.20 |
|
|
|
57.71 |
|
Our statuts provide that each ordinary share that is
fully paid and has been held in registered form by the same
shareholder for a period of at least two consecutive years will
entitle such shareholder to two votes at meetings of
shareholders. As at January 25, 2007, IFP had held
1,360,622 fully paid ordinary shares in registered form for two
consecutive years, giving IFP 9.64% of the voting power of the
outstanding ordinary shares as at such date. Other than in this
respect, our ordinary shares carry identical voting rights. Our
statuts provide that fully paid ordinary shares may be
held in either registered form or bearer form at the option of
the shareholder. Substantially all ordinary shares held by
shareholders other than IFP are presently held in bearer form.
In connection with the merger, we issued 9,215,845 ordinary
shares that were deposited with The Bank of New York Trust
Company, National Association as ADS depository, which issued
46,054,225 ADSs to be paid as merger consideration to
former holders of Veritas common stock.
The terms of CGGs $85 million convertible bonds due
2012 were amended by the CGG general meeting of bondholders held
on November 2, 2005, as approved by a general meeting of
CGG shareholders held on November 16, 2005 in order to
provide bondholders with the opportunity to redeem their
convertible bonds before maturity and receive an additional cash
payment. The early conversion period was open from November 17
to November 18, 2005, inclusive. At the conclusion of the
conversion period, 11,475 convertible bonds due 2012 were
converted, leading to the issuance of 1,147,500 new shares.
2,525 convertible bonds remain outstanding with a nominal value
of $15.3 million. CGG paid a total premium of
$10.4 million to the bondholders who converted their bonds.
A general meeting of bondholders, held on April 5, 2006,
and a general meeting of CGG shareholders, held on May 11,
2006, approved a change to the terms and conditions of the
remaining convertible bonds to grant bondholders a right to
receive a cash payment upon immediate conversion of the bonds.
The early conversion period was open on May 12, 2006 only.
At the conclusion of the conversion period, all the remaining
2,525 convertible bonds were converted, leading CGG to issue of
274,914 new shares of CGG and pay a total premium of
$2.1 million to the converting bondholders.
On December 16, 2005, CGG completed a share capital
increase by way of preferential subscription rights. CGG issued
4,099,128 new shares of our common stock bearing rights from
January 1, 2005, bringing its total share capital at that
date to 17,079,718 ordinary shares, par value
2 per
share. CGG used the net proceeds to repay $235 million
under its $375 million bridge loan facility, which facility
was used to finance the acquisition of Exploration Resources.
140
On March 18, 2005, CGG Investors LLC and GF Ltd.
Transaction Partnership LP (The Beacon Group) sold
all the 1,777,071 ordinary shares they owned, representing
15.21% of our total share capital, by means of a private
placement in Europe.
Related Party Transactions
We provide geophysical services and equipment to oil and gas
exploration and production subsidiaries of the Total Group
pursuant to contracts entered into on an arms-length
basis. Total Chimie, which was until 2004 one of our major
shareholders, is a member of the Total Group. Aggregate
operating revenues to this group totaled
23.1 million
in 2004 and
30.2 million
in 2003.
Louis Dreyfus Armateurs (LDA) provides ship
management services for a portion of our fleet. Debt to LDA was
6.0 million,
6.2 million
and
1.3 million
as at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively and
0.5 million
at June 30, 2006. Total net charges paid throughout the
year for the provision of ship management services were
0.8 million,
0.5 million
and
7.2 million
for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively and
2.4 million
throughout the six months ended June 30, 2006. Future
commitments for such services to LDA were
23.2 million,
6.8 million
and
10.0 million
for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively and
13.6 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
LDA and we own Geomar, a company accounted for under the equity
method. Geomar is the owner of the CGG Alizé seismic
vessel. LDA has a 51% controlling stake and we have a 49% stake
in Geomar. We paid
8.8 million,
9.0 million
and
9.7 million
to Geomar during the years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively,
and
4.5 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2006, while future
charter party amounts due to Geomar were
12.0 million,
18.6 million
and
28.5 million
as at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively and
6.6 million
as at June 30, 2006. Debt to Geomar was
0.9 million,
0.7 million
and
1.5 million
as at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively and
0.7 million
as at June 30, 2006.
The sales of geophysical products from Sercel to Argas, our 49%
owned affiliate, were
8.1 million
in 2005 (representing 0.9% of the Group revenues),
1.3 million
in 2004 (representing 0.2% of the Group revenues) and
1.7 million
in 2003 (representing 0.3% of the Group revenues) and
0.6 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (representing 0.1%
of the Group revenues). These transactions were concluded on an
arms length basis.
Sales of geophysical products from Sercel to Xian Peic, our 40%
owned affiliate, were
2.9 million
in 2005 (representing 0.3% of Group revenues) and
4.8 million
in 2004 (representing 0.7% of Group revenues) and
2.4 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (representing 0.4%
of the Group revenues). These transactions were concluded on an
arms length basis.
141
DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS
The following is a description of the terms of our material
financing arrangements.
Bridge Loan Facility
On November 22, 2006, CGG, as borrower, and certain of its
subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a $1.6 billion
senior secured bridge loan facility agreement with Credit Suisse
International, as agent and security agent, and the lenders
party thereto. On January 12, 2007, CGG borrowed
$700 million under the bridge loan facility, and the
proceeds were used to:
|
|
|
|
|
finance a portion of the cash component of the merger
consideration; |
|
|
|
repay certain existing debt of CGG and Veritas; and |
|
|
|
pay the fees and expenses incurred in connection with the
foregoing. |
Upon such borrowing and the concurrent funding of the
$1.0 billion term loan facility, the unused commitments of
$900 million were terminated.
We will use the net proceeds of this offering, together with
cash on hand, to repay in full the bridge loan facility.
Senior Facilities
On January 12, 2006, Veritas, as borrower, and CGG entered
into a $1.115 billion senior secured credit agreement with
Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and
the lenders party thereto, pursuant to which credit agreement
Veritas borrowed a $1.0 billion senior secured term
loan B and obtained a $115 million senior
secured U.S. revolving facility (which revolving facility
includes letter of credit and swingline subfacilities).
Aggregate commitments under the U.S. revolving facility are
expected to be increased to $140 million.
The proceeds of the term loan facility were used to:
|
|
|
|
|
finance a portion of the cash component of the merger
consideration; |
|
|
|
repay certain existing debt of CGG and Veritas; and |
|
|
|
pay the fees and expenses incurred in connection with the
foregoing. |
In addition, proceeds of the term loan facility may be used to
repurchase up to 3,000,000 of our common shares (or the
corresponding number of our ADSs).
Proceeds of loans under the U.S. revolving facility may be
used for the general corporate purposes of Veritas.
The term loan facility amortizes in equal quarterly installments
of $2.5 million, with the balance payable on
January 12, 2014. Revolving loans may be made at any time
prior to the final maturity of the U.S. revolving facility
on January 12, 2012. Subject to certain exceptions, we are
required to repay the principal outstanding under the term loan
facility with a portion of our excess cash flow as well as with
certain proceeds of insurance, asset sales and debt and equity
issuances.
The obligations of Veritas as borrower under the senior
facilities are guaranteed by us and the Initial Guarantors of
the notes (with the exception of Sercel Canada Ltd., which does
not guarantee the senior facilities), and will be guaranteed by
any future guarantors of the notes or future refinancing
facilities. We have pledged first-priority security in the
shares of Veritas and certain of our other first-tier
subsidiaries, as well as material first-tier subsidiaries of
Veritas. In addition, certain guarantors have provided (or will
provide) first-priority security interests in certain of their
respective tangible and intangible assets, including (without
limitation) certain vessels, real property, mineral rights,
deposit accounts and intellectual property. In the case of
certain of our subsidiaries (most notably Veritas and certain
U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries), the collateral may comprise
substantially all of their respective assets.
142
Our obligations under, and the guarantees issued in respect of
the French revolving facility described below will rank pari
passu in right of payment with the obligations of Veritas
under the guarantees issued in respect of the senior facilities.
The lien priority and other creditors rights issues in
respect of the senior facilities and the bridge loan facility
are set forth in an intercreditor agreement that provides, among
other things, that so long as any obligations are outstanding
under the senior facilities, Credit Suisse (acting as agent for
the senior facilities lenders as first lien lenders) will
control all remedies and other action related to the collateral.
At the option of the borrower, borrowings under the term loan
facility bear interest at the rate of adjusted LIBOR plus either
1.75% or 2.00% or the Alternate Base Rate plus either 0.75% or
1.00%, in each case depending on the corporate rating of
CGGVeritas by S&P and the corporate family rating of
CGGVeritas by Moodys. At the option of the borrower,
borrowings under the U.S. revolving facility bear interest
at the rate of adjusted LIBOR plus a range from 1.75% to 2.25%
or the Alternate Base Rate plus a range from 0.75% to 1.25%, in
each case depending on the corporate rating of CGGVeritas by
S&P and the corporate family rating of CGGVeritas by
Moodys. The Alternate Base Rate is the higher of Credit
Suisses Prime Rate and the Federal Funds Effective Rate
plus
1/2
of 1.0%.
We are required to adhere to certain financial covenants
(measured under the financial definitions set forth in the
credit agreement governing the senior facilities), including:
|
|
|
|
|
maximum ratio of (i) total net debt to
(ii) ORBDA; and |
|
|
|
minimum ratio of (i) ORBDA less capital expenditures to
(ii) total interest costs. |
For further information on these financial covenants, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources CGGVeritas Capital
Resources ORBDA.
We are subject to affirmative and negative covenants that affect
our ability, among other things, to borrow money, incur liens,
dispose of assets and acquisitions and pay dividends or redeem
shares. Events of default under the senior facilities include,
among other things, payment and covenant breaches, insolvency of
us or our subsidiaries, the occurrence of certain events
constituting a change of control of and certain
defaults in respect of other material financial indebtedness.
|
|
|
French Revolving Facility |
We intend to enter as borrower into a $200,000,000 revolving
credit agreement with a syndicate of banks with Natixis as
facility agent and Credit Suisse as collateral agent, in order
to replace our previous $60,000,000 revolving facility made
available to CGG, CGG Services and Sercel on March 12, 2004
and cancelled prior to the merger. A
40,000,000
swingline facility will operate as a sub-limit within the French
revolving facility. We intend to use the proceeds of loans under
the French revolving facility for general corporate purposes.
Each cash advance under the French revolving facility will be
repaid in full at the end of the relevant interest period of one
month to twelve months and is available for redrawing during the
availability period. All drawings under the French revolving
facility must be repaid on the final maturity date expected to
be in 2012.
To secure the obligations under the French revolving facility,
we and our material subsidiaries (other than Sercel Canada Ltd.)
acting as guarantors intend to grant the same guarantees and
security interests as were granted to secure the obligations
under the senior facilities and the bridge loan facility.
We expect that the revolving loans (other than swingline loans),
will bear interest (computed on the basis of the actual number
of days elapsed over 360) at a rate per annum equal to the
aggregate of: (i) the applicable margin; (ii) EURIBOR
in relation to loans made in euro and LIBOR in relation to loans
made in dollars for the relevant interest period; and
(iii) mandatory costs, if any.
We expect that the swingline loans will bear interest (computed
on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed over 360) at a
rate per annum equal to the aggregate of: (i) the
applicable margin; (ii) EONIA; and (ii) the mandatory
cost (if any).
143
Debt Securities
|
|
|
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 |
On April 28, 2005, CGG issued $165 million aggregate
principal amount of its
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 at par in the international capital markets. CGG
used the $159.8 million of net proceeds to redeem and pay
accrued interest on all of the outstanding $150 million
aggregate principal amount of CGGs
105/8% Senior
Notes due 2007 on May 31, 2005. On November 9, 2005,
$164.5 million in principal amount of these notes were
exchanged for identical notes registered with the SEC.
On February 3, 2006, CGG issued an additional
$165 million of its
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 issued in April 2005 in a private placement to
certain eligible investors. The notes were issued at a price of
103.25% of their principal amount. The net proceeds from the
notes were used mainly to repay on February 10, 2006, the
$140.3 million remaining under CGGs $375 million
bridge loan facility used to finance the acquisition of
Exploration Resources. On August 17, 2006,
$164 million in principal amount of these notes were
exchanged for identical notes registered with the SEC.
|
|
|
Veritas Floating Rate Convertible Senior Notes due
2024 |
On March 3, 2004, Veritas issued $155 million in
principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2024.
Convertible notes in a principal amount of $130.5 million
were converted prior to the merger, and $24.5 million
remained outstanding. CGGVeritas has guaranteed the convertible
bonds following the merger.
The convertible notes bear interest at a per annum rate which
equals the three-month LIBOR, adjusted quarterly, minus a spread
of 0.75%. The notes will mature on March 15, 2024 and may
not be redeemed prior to March 20, 2009. Holders of the
notes may require CGGVeritas Services Inc. (as successor to
Veritas) to repurchase some, or all, of the notes on
March 15, 2009, 2014 and 2019. They may also require
repurchase upon a change of control, such as the merger.
Under certain circumstances and at the option of the holder, the
convertible notes are convertible prior to the maturity.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, the indenture governing the
convertible bonds and a supplemental indenture in connection
with the merger, the holders of convertible bonds are entitled
to receive, upon conversion, consideration exclusively in the
form of CGGVeritas ADSs.
Other Credit Facilities
|
|
|
$70 million DnB Credit Facility |
On March 29, 2006, CGG signed a long term facility
agreement with DnB NOR Bank ASA and certain other banks and
financial institutions of up to $70,000,000 to partially finance
the conversion of both the
C-Orion and the
Geo Challenger into 3D vessels, and to purchase new
marine streamers. This facility includes pledges over the
C-Orion and Geo-Challenger vessels (including
their equipment), as well as over the shares of a subsidiary of
Exploration Resources and its assets, and a negative pledge
clause with respect to all other vessels of Exploration
Resources and the shares of all other subsidiaries of
Exploration Resources.
144
DESCRIPTION OF THE ADDITIONAL NOTES
General
You can find the definitions of certain terms used in this
description of the notes under the caption
Certain Definitions. In this
description, the word Company refers only to
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas, S.A.,
and not to any of its subsidiaries.
The notes offered hereby (the Additional
Notes) will be issued as additional notes under the
Indenture dated as of the Issue Date among the Company, the
Guarantors and The Bank of New York Trust Company, National
Association (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association), as trustee (the Trustee). On
April 28, 2005, we issued $165.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 under the Indenture, and we subsequently
exchanged $164.5 million in aggregate principal amount of
these notes for publicly-registered notes with identical terms
(the Initial Notes). On February 3,
2006, we issued an additional $165.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 under the Indenture, and we subsequently
exchanged $164.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
these notes for publicly-registered notes with identical terms
(the 2006 Additional Notes, and together with
the Initial Notes, the Existing Notes). The
Additional Notes and the Existing Notes will be treated as a
single class of debt securities under the Indenture, including
for purposes of determining whether the required percentage of
holders of the Notes have given their approval or consent to an
amendment or waiver or joined in directing the Trustee to take
certain actions on behalf of all holders of the Notes. After
consummation of this offering, the Additional Notes will
represent %
of all of the Notes issued under the Indenture. The terms of the
Notes will include those stated in the Indenture and those made
part of the Indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture Act of
1939, as amended (the
Trust Indenture Act).
The following description is a summary of the material
provisions of the Indenture. It does not restate the Indenture
in its entirety. We urge you to read the Indenture because it,
and not this description, will define your rights as holders of
the Notes.
Copies of the Indenture are available for inspection during
normal business hours at the office of the Company referred to
under the caption Available Information,
at the corporate trust office of the Trustee at 601 Travis
Street, 18th Floor, Houston, Texas 77002, and at the
specified office of each Paying Agent, including, for so long as
the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, at the
specified office of the Paying Agent in Luxembourg. Holders of
the Notes are entitled to the benefit of, are bound by, and are
deemed to have notice of, all the provisions of the Indenture.
Brief Description of the Notes
The Notes will, upon issuance:
|
|
|
|
|
be general senior, unsecured obligations of the Company; |
|
|
|
rank equally in right of payment to all existing and future
senior, unsecured indebtedness of the Company, except for any
liabilities preferred by law; |
|
|
|
rank senior in right of payment to all existing and future
subordinated indebtedness of the Company; |
|
|
|
be guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by certain
Subsidiaries of the Company as described below; and |
|
|
|
be effectively subordinated to all existing and future
indebtedness of Subsidiaries of the Company that are not
Guarantors. |
Holders of existing and future secured indebtedness of the
Company and its Subsidiaries, including loans under the existing
Credit Facilities, will have claims with respect to the assets
constituting collateral for such secured indebtedness that are
superior to the claims of the holders of the Notes. Accordingly,
the Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees will be effectively
subordinated to claims of secured creditors of the Company and
the Guarantors to the extent of such collateral.
145
Only certain Subsidiaries of the Company will guarantee the
Notes. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or
reorganization of any Subsidiary of the Company that is not a
Guarantor, that Subsidiary will pay the holders of its debt and
its trade creditors before it will be able to distribute any of
its assets to the Company.
Assuming that the merger and the financing transactions,
including the offering of the Notes and the use of the proceeds
thereof, had occurred as at September 30, 2006, there would
have been
947 million
of outstanding indebtedness including accrued interest
effectively senior to the Notes as of September 30, 2006,
of which
926 million
would have been secured and the Initial Guarantors (as defined
under the caption Subsidiary
Guarantees Guarantors) (excluding their
Subsidiaries that are not Guarantors) would have had outstanding
external total Indebtedness of
1,540 million.
Indebtedness of the Initial Guarantors is included in the total
Indebtedness of the Company and its Subsidiaries. In addition,
as at September 30, 2006, the Company and its Subsidiaries
had availability under their Credit Facilities of
$20 million, which if drawn would have been secured. Each
of the Initial Guarantors, other than Sercel Canada, is an
obligor under the senior facilities and the French revolving
facility. The Indenture will permit the Company and its
Subsidiaries (including the Guarantors) to incur additional
Indebtedness, including certain additional secured Indebtedness.
As of the date of the Indenture, all of the Companys
Subsidiaries will be Restricted Subsidiaries. Under certain
circumstances, the Company will be able to designate current or
future Subsidiaries as Unrestricted Subsidiaries. Unrestricted
Subsidiaries will not be subject to the restrictive covenants
set forth in the Indenture and will not guarantee the Notes.
The Indenture provides the Company the flexibility of issuing
additional Notes in the future in an unlimited amount; however,
any issuance of such additional Notes would be subject to the
covenant described under the caption Certain
Covenants Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock. The Existing Notes, the Additional
Notes and any such additional Notes are collectively referred to
as the Notes in this Description of the
Additional Notes.
Whenever the covenants or default provisions or definitions in
the Indenture refer to an amount in U.S. dollars or euros,
that amount will be deemed to refer to the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent or the Euro Equivalent, respectively, of the amount
of any obligation denominated in any other currency or
currencies, including composite currencies.
Any other determination of the U.S. Dollar Equivalent or
the Euro Equivalent for any purpose under the Indenture will be
determined as of a date of determination as described in the
definitions of U.S. Dollar Equivalent and
Euro Equivalent under Certain
Definitions and, in any case, no subsequent change in the
U.S. Dollar Equivalent or the Euro Equivalent after the
applicable date of determination will cause such determination
to be modified.
Principal, Maturity and Interest
The Additional Notes will be limited in aggregate principal
amount to $300,000,000 and will mature on May 15,
2015. Interest on the Notes will accrue at the rate of
71/2% per
annum and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and
November 15 of each year, commencing on May 15, 2007, in
the case of the Additional Notes, to holders of record on the
immediately preceding May 1 and November 1. Interest on the
Additional Notes will accrue from the most recent date to which
interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from
November 15, 2006, the last payment date in respect of the
Existing Notes. Interest will be computed on the basis of a
360-day year comprised
of twelve 30-day months.
Payment and Paying Agents
Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Notes will be
payable in U.S. dollars at the office or agency of the
Company maintained for such purpose in the continental United
States and, subject to any fiscal or other laws and regulations
applicable thereto, at the specified offices of any other Paying
Agent appointed by the Company for such purpose, or, at the
option of the Company, payment of interest may be made by check
mailed to holders of the Notes at their respective addresses set
forth in the register of holders; provided, however, that
all payments with respect to Notes the holders of which have
given wire transfer instructions to the Company or a
146
Paying Agent will be required to be made by wire transfer of
immediately available funds to the accounts specified by the
holders thereof. The principal of the Notes will be payable only
upon surrender of any Note at the Corporate Trust Office of
the Trustee or at the specified offices of any other Paying
Agent.
If the due date for payment of the principal in respect of any
Note is not a business day at the place in which it is presented
for payment, the holder thereof will not be entitled to payment
of the amount due until the next succeeding business day at such
place and will not be entitled to any further interest or other
payment in respect of any such delay.
The Indenture provides that any money deposited with the Trustee
or any Paying Agent in trust for the payment of the principal
of, premium, if any, or interest on any Note and remaining
unclaimed for two years after such principal, premium, if any,
or interest have become due and payable will be paid to the
Company, and will be discharged from such trust; and the holder
of such Note will thereafter, as an unsecured general creditor,
look only to the Company for payment thereof, and all liability
of the Trustee or such Paying Agent with respect to such money
will thereupon cease.
The Corporate Trust Office of the Trustee in Dallas, Texas
will initially be designated as the Companys Paying Agent
for payments with respect to the Notes. So long as the Notes are
listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such
stock exchange so require, the Company will maintain a Paying
Agent in Luxembourg. Dexia Banque Internationale à
Luxembourg, société anonyme will initially be
designated as the Companys Paying Agent in Luxembourg and
as the Companys agent where Notes may be surrendered for
registration of transfer and exchange. The Company may at any
time designate one or more additional Paying Agents or rescind
the designation of any Paying Agent or approve a change in the
office through which any Paying Agent acts, except that the
Company will be required to maintain a Paying Agent in the
continental United States. The Company will give notice to each
holder of Notes, in the manner described under the caption
Notices, of any change in Paying Agents.
Subsidiary Guarantees
The obligations of each Guarantor under its Subsidiary Guarantee
will be general senior, unsecured obligations of such Guarantor,
ranking pari passu in right of payment with all other
senior indebtedness of such Guarantor and senior in right of
payment to any subordinated indebtedness of such Guarantor. The
Subsidiary Guarantees will be joint and several obligations of
the Guarantors. Holders of existing and future secured
indebtedness of the Guarantors, including loans under the
existing credit facilities (including the senior facilities and
the French revolving facility) will have claims with respect to
the assets constituting collateral for such secured indebtedness
that are superior to the claims of the holders of the Notes.
The Indenture provides that the obligations of each Guarantor
under its Subsidiary Guarantee will be limited to the maximum
amount as will, after giving effect to such maximum amount and
all other contingent and fixed liabilities of such Guarantor
that are relevant under bankruptcy, fraudulent conveyance and
fraudulent transfer and similar laws, and after giving effect to
any collections from, rights to receive contribution from or
payments made by or on behalf of any other Guarantor in respect
of the obligations of such other Guarantor under its Subsidiary
Guarantee, result in the obligations of such Guarantor under its
Subsidiary Guarantee not constituting a fraudulent transfer or
conveyance. In addition, the obligations of each Guarantor under
its Subsidiary Guarantee shall be limited to the extent required
by applicable law.
Only certain Subsidiaries of the Company will guarantee the
Notes. On the date of the issuance of the Additional Notes, the
Notes will be guaranteed by CGGVeritas Services Inc., Veritas
DGC Land Inc., Veritas Geophysical Corporation, Veritas
Investments Inc., Viking Maritime Inc., Veritas Geophysical
(Mexico) LLC, Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd. and
Alitheia Resources Inc. (the Veritas
Guarantors), Sercel Inc., Sercel Canada Ltd. and
Sercel Australia Pty Ltd (the Sercel
Guarantors) and CGG Americas, Inc., CGG Canada
Services Ltd. and CGG Marine Resources Norge A/ S (the
CGG Guarantors, and together with the Veritas
147
Guarantors and the Sercel Guarantors, the Initial
Guarantors). For more information about the Initial
Guarantors, see General Information and
Note 31D to the CGG consolidated annual financial
statements, Note 4 to CGGs consolidated interim
financial statements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, Note 16 to the Veritas
consolidated annual financial statements and Note 11 to
Veritas consolidated interim financial statements for the
three months ended October 31, 2006, all included elsewhere
in this prospectus. The Companys other Subsidiaries will
not initially guarantee the Additional Notes and, in certain
circumstances described below under the caption
Release, the Company may elect to have
the Sercel Guarantors released from their Subsidiary Guarantees.
In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of
any Subsidiary of the Company that is not a Guarantor, that
Subsidiary will pay the holders of its debt and its trade
creditors before it will be able to distribute any of its assets
to the Company.
The Veritas Guarantors (excluding their subsidiaries that have
not guaranteed the Notes) generated, before consolidation
entries, $384.1 million of revenues, $65.5 million of
operating income and $49.5 million of net income in the
year ended July 31, 2006 and held $807.9 million of
total assets before consolidation entries. They generated,
before consolidation entries, $112.5 million of revenues,
$15.2 million of operating income and $20.4 million of
net income in the three month-period ended October 31, 2006
and held $781.3 million of total assets before
consolidation entries as at October 31, 2006.
The CGG Guarantors (excluding their subsidiaries that have not
guaranteed the Notes) generated, before consolidation entries,
161.0 million
of revenues,
49.8 million
of operating income and
30.7 million
of net income in the year ended December 31, 2005 and held
394.4 million
of total assets before consolidation entries. They generated,
before consolidation entries,
194.2 million
of revenues,
92.8 million
of operating income and
54.7 million
of net income in the nine-month period ended September 30,
2006 and held
402.1 million
of total assets before consolidation entries as at
September 30, 2006.
The Sercel Guarantors (excluding their subsidiaries that have
not guaranteed the Notes) generated, before consolidation
entries,
146.5 million
of revenues,
10.9 million
of operating income and
6.3 million
of net income in the year ended December 31, 2005 and held
205.9 million
of total assets before consolidation entries. They generated,
before consolidation entries,
229.3 million
of revenues,
33.6 million
of operating income and
22.3 million
of net income in the nine-month period ended September 30,
2006 and held
208.7 million
of total assets before consolidation entries. The revenue,
operating income, net income and assets of the Sercel Guarantors
are included in those of the Initial Guarantors. In the
circumstances described under the caption
Certain Covenants Guarantees of
Certain Indebtedness by Restricted Subsidiaries the
Indenture will require certain of the Companys other
Subsidiaries to become Guarantors. For more information about
the Initial Guarantors, see General Information.
In addition, a Restricted Subsidiary may become a Guarantor, at
its option, by executing a supplemental indenture providing for
a Subsidiary Guarantee in accordance with the provisions of the
Indenture.
The Indenture provides that, in the event of (a) a
transfer, conveyance, sale or other disposition of any Capital
Stock of Sercel S.A. or any Sercel Guarantor or (b) the
issue by Sercel S.A. or any Sercel Guarantor of any Equity
Interests, in either case to any Person other than the Company
or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, the Company may elect
to have the Sercel Guarantors released and relieved of any
obligations under their Subsidiary Guarantees, provided that
the Net Proceeds of such issuance, transfer, conveyance,
sale or other disposition are applied in accordance with the
covenant described below under the caption Put
Option of Holders Asset Sales and the Sercel
Guarantors have no other guarantees of Indebtedness of the
Company or any other Guarantors (other than Permitted
Guarantees) then outstanding. If a Restricted Subsidiary has
become a Guarantor at its option, it may thereafter be released
and relieved of its obligations under its Subsidiary Guarantee
at its option, provided that such Guarantor has no
guarantee of Indebtedness of the Company or any Guarantor (other
than Permitted Guarantees) then outstanding. The Indenture
further provides that, for purposes of the covenant described
under Certain Covenants Incurrence
of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified Stock, the
release of any Subsidiary Guarantee pursuant to provisions
described in this paragraph shall be
148
deemed to be an incurrence by the Restricted Subsidiary whose
Subsidiary Guarantee is being released of all Indebtedness then
held by such Restricted Subsidiary.
The Indenture provides that, in the event of a transfer,
conveyance, sale or other disposition (including by way of
merger or consolidation) of all or substantially all of the
assets or all of the Capital Stock of any Guarantor, then such
Guarantor will be released and relieved of any obligations under
its Subsidiary Guarantee and the Indenture, provided that the
Net Proceeds of such transfer, conveyance, sale or other
disposition are applied in accordance with the covenant
described below under the caption Put Option
of Holders Asset Sales. A Guarantor will
likewise be released and relieved of its obligations under its
Subsidiary Guarantee upon the release of any guarantee of
Indebtedness of the Company that required such Guarantor to
guarantee the Notes pursuant to the covenant described below
under the caption Certain
Covenants Guarantees of Certain Indebtedness by
Restricted Subsidiaries except a discharge or release by
or as a result of direct payment under such guarantee,
provided that the Guarantor has no other guarantee of
Indebtedness of the Company or any Guarantor (other than
Permitted Guarantees) then outstanding. The Indenture also
provides that, if the Board of Directors designates a Guarantor
to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary, then such Guarantor will be
released and relieved of any obligations under its Subsidiary
Guarantee and the Indenture, provided that such
designation is conducted in accordance with the applicable
provisions of the Indenture.
The Indenture provides that, for so long as a Restricted
Subsidiary provides a Subsidiary Guarantee pursuant to the terms
of the Indenture, such Guarantor may not consolidate with or
merge with or into (whether or not such Guarantor is the
surviving Person) another Person (other than the Company or
another Guarantor), unless:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or
merger (if other than such Guarantor) shall execute a Subsidiary
Guarantee and deliver an opinion of counsel in accordance with
the terms of the Indenture; |
|
|
(b) |
immediately after giving effect to such transaction, no Default
or Event of Default exists; |
|
|
(c) |
such Guarantor, or any Person formed by or surviving any such
consolidation or merger, would have a Consolidated Net Worth
(immediately after giving effect to such transaction) equal to
or greater than the Consolidated Net Worth of such Guarantor
immediately preceding the transaction; and |
|
|
(d) |
the Company would be permitted by virtue of the Companys
pro forma Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio, immediately
after giving effect to such transaction, to incur at least
1.00 of
additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio test set forth in the covenant described under
the caption Certain Covenants
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified
Stock. |
Optional Redemption
At any time prior to May 15, 2010, the Company may redeem
the Notes at its option, in whole or in part, at a redemption
price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus the
Applicable Premium as of, and accrued and unpaid interest to,
the date of redemption.
The Notes will also be redeemable at the Companys option
on or after May 15, 2010, in whole or in part, at the
redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount)
set forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the
applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the
12-month period
beginning May 15 of the years indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
2010
|
|
|
103.75% |
|
2011
|
|
|
102.50% |
|
2012
|
|
|
101.25% |
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
149
Further, prior to May 15, 2008, the Company may redeem on
any one or more occasions Notes representing up to 35% of the
sum of the aggregate principal amount of the Existing Notes and
the Additional Notes plus any other Notes originally issued
under the Indenture after the Issue Date at a redemption price
of 107.50% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and
unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date, with the net
cash proceeds of one or more Qualified Equity Offerings,
provided that (a) Notes representing at least 65% of
the sum of the aggregate principal amount of the Existing Notes
and the Additional Notes plus any other Notes originally issued
under the Indenture after the Issue Date remain outstanding
immediately after the occurrence of each such redemption and
(b) such redemption occurs within 90 days of the date
of the closing of each such Qualified Equity Offering.
Selection and Notice
If less than all of the Notes are to be redeemed at any time,
the Trustee will select Notes for redemption as follows:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
if the Notes are listed, in compliance with the requirements of
the principal securities exchange on which the Notes are
listed; or |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
if the Notes are not so listed, on a pro rata basis, by lot or
by such method as the Trustee shall deem fair and appropriate. |
No Notes of $1,000 or less shall be redeemed in part.
Notices of redemption shall be mailed by first class mail at
least 30 but not more than 60 days before the redemption
date to each holder of Notes to be redeemed at its registered
address. For so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg
Stock Exchange and for so long as the rules of such exchange
require, notices of redemption will be published once by the
Trustee, not less than five business days prior to the
redemption date, in a newspaper having general circulation in
Luxembourg, which is expected to be DWort or if
such newspaper ceases to be published or timely publication in
it will not be practicable, in such other newspaper as the
Trustee deems necessary to give fair and reasonable notice to
the holders of Notes. Notices may also be published on the
internet site of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange at www.bourse.lu.
Notices of redemption may not be conditional.
If any Note is to be redeemed in part only, the notice of
redemption that relates to that Note shall state the portion of
the principal amount thereof to be redeemed. A new Note in
principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion of the original
Note will be issued in the name of the holder thereof upon
surrender of the original Note. Notes called for redemption
become due on the date fixed for redemption. On and after the
redemption date, interest will cease to accrue on Notes or
portions of them called for redemption.
Redemption for Taxation Reasons
The Indenture provides that the Company may at any time redeem,
in whole but not in part, the outstanding Notes at a redemption
price of 100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and
unpaid interest thereon to the date of redemption if it or any
Guarantor has become or would become obligated to pay any
Additional Amounts (as defined under the caption
Additional Amounts) in respect of the
Notes as a result of:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
(1) any change in or amendment to the laws or treaties (or
regulations or rulings promulgated thereunder) of a Relevant
Taxing Jurisdiction (as defined under the caption
Additional Amounts) or (2) any
change in or amendment to any official position regarding the
application or interpretation of such laws, treaties,
regulations or rulings, which change or amendment is announced
or is effective on or after the date of the Indenture; and |
|
|
(b) |
such obligation cannot be avoided by the Company or any such
Guarantor taking reasonable measures available to it. |
Notwithstanding the preceding, no notice of redemption will be
given earlier than 60 days prior to the earliest date on
which the Company could be obligated to pay such Additional
Amounts if a payment in respect
150
of the Notes was then due. Prior to giving notice of any such
redemption, the Company will deliver to the Trustee (y) an
Officers Certificate stating that the obligation to pay
Additional Amounts cannot be avoided by the Company or any such
Guarantor taking reasonable measures available to it and
(z) a written opinion of an independent legal counsel to
the Company to the effect that the circumstances referred to
above exist.
Additional Amounts
The Indenture provides that payments made by or on behalf of the
Company or any Guarantor under or with respect to the Notes or
the Subsidiary Guarantees will be made free and clear of and
without withholding or deduction for or on account of any
present or future tax, duty, levy, interest, assessment or other
governmental charge (Taxes) imposed or levied
by or on behalf of any jurisdiction in which the Company or any
Guarantor (including any successor entities), is then organized
or resident for tax purposes or any political subdivision
thereof or therein or any jurisdiction by or through which
payment is made (each, a Relevant Taxing
Jurisdiction), unless the Company or any Guarantor (or
any Paying Agent) is required to withhold or deduct Taxes under
the laws of the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction or by the
interpretation or administration thereof by the relevant taxing
authority. If the Company or any Guarantor (or any Paying Agent)
is so required to withhold or deduct any amount for or on
account of Taxes from any payment made under or with respect to
the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees, the Company or any such
Guarantor (and each Paying Agent) will pay to each holder of the
Notes that are outstanding on the date of the required payment,
such additional amounts (Additional Amounts)
as may be necessary so that the net amount received by such
holder (including the Additional Amounts) after such withholding
or deduction will not be less than the amount such holder would
have received if such Taxes had not been withheld or deducted,
provided that no Additional Amounts will be payable with respect
to any Note:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
surrendered by the holder thereof for payment of principal more
than 30 days after the later of (1) the date on which
such payment first became due and (2) if the full amount
payable has not been received by or on behalf of the relevant
holder on or prior to such due date, the date on which, the full
amount having been so received, notice to that effect shall have
been given to the holders by the Trustee, except to the extent
that the holder would have been entitled to such Additional
Amounts on surrendering such Note for payment on the last day of
the applicable 30-day
period; |
|
|
(b) |
if any tax, assessment or other governmental charge is imposed
or withheld by reason of the failure to comply by the holder or,
if different, the beneficial owner (ayant-droit) of the
Note with a request addressed to such holder or beneficial owner
to provide information, documents or other evidence concerning
the nationality, residence, identity or connection with the
Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction of such holder or beneficial owner
which is required or imposed by a statute, treaty, regulation or
administrative practice of the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction as a
precondition to exemption from all or part of such tax,
assessment or governmental charge; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
held by or on behalf of a holder who is liable for Taxes in
respect of such Note by reason of having some connection with
the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction other than the mere purchase,
holding or disposition of any Note, or the receipt of payments
made by or on behalf of the Company or any Guarantor in respect
thereof or any Subsidiary Guarantee, including, without
limitation, such holder being or having been a citizen or
resident thereof or being or having been present or engaged in a
trade or business therein or having had a permanent
establishment therein; |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
on account of any estate, inheritance, gift, sale, transfer,
personal property or other similar tax, assessment or other
governmental charge; |
|
|
(e) |
except in the case of the winding up of the Company or any
Guarantor, any Note surrendered for payment in the Republic of
France; |
|
|
(f) |
any withholding or deduction imposed on a payment to an
individual which is required to be made pursuant to any law
implementing or complying with, or introduced in order to
conform to European Council Directive 2003/48/ EC or any
other Directive implementing the conclusions of the ECOFIN
Council meeting of November, 26-27, 2000 on the taxation of
savings income or any |
151
|
|
|
|
|
agreement between the European Community and any jurisdiction
providing for equivalent measures; or |
|
|
(g) |
as a result of any combination of (a), (b), (c), (d),
(e) or (f) or with respect to any payment made by or
on behalf of the Company or any Guarantor in respect of any Note
or Subsidiary Guarantee to any holder who is a fiduciary or
partnership or other than the sole beneficial owner of such
payment to the extent that a beneficiary or settlor or
beneficial owner would not have been entitled to any Additional
Amounts had such beneficiary or settlor or beneficial owner been
the holder. |
The Company or any Guarantor will also make such withholding or
deduction and remit the full amount deducted or withheld to the
relevant authority in accordance with applicable law. The
Company will furnish, within 60 days after the date the
payment of any Taxes is due pursuant to applicable law, to the
Trustee, copies of tax receipts (to the extent received from the
relevant tax authorities in the usual course or as generally
provided) evidencing that such payment has been made by the
Company or any Guarantor. The Trustee will make such evidence
available to the holders upon request.
At least 30 days prior to each date on which any payment
under or with respect to the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees
is due and payable, if the Company or any Guarantor becomes
obligated to pay Additional Amounts with respect to such
payment, the Company will deliver to each Paying Agent an
Officers Certificate stating the fact that such Additional
Amounts will be payable, and the amount so payable and will set
forth such other information as necessary to enable such Paying
Agent to pay such Additional Amounts to the holders of the Notes
on the payment date. Whenever in the Indenture or this
prospectus there is mentioned, in any context, (a) the
payment of principal (and premium, if any), (b) purchase
prices in connection with a purchase of the Notes,
(c) interest or (d) any other amount payable on or
with respect to any of the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees,
such mention is deemed to include mention of the payment of
Additional Amounts provided for in this section to the extent,
that, in such context, Additional Amounts are, were or would be
payable in respect thereof.
The Company or a Guarantor, as the case may be, will pay any
present or future stamp, court or documentary taxes or any other
excise or property taxes, charges or similar levies that arise
in the United States, the Republic of France or in any
jurisdiction in which a Paying Agent is located from the initial
issue or registration of the Notes or on the enforcement of any
payments with respect to the Notes or any Subsidiary Guarantee.
The obligations of the Company or any Guarantor described in
this Additional Amounts section will
survive the satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture.
Mandatory Redemption
Except as set forth below under the caption
Put Option of Holders, the Company will
not be required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund
payments with respect to the Notes.
Put Option of Holders
The Indenture provides that, upon the occurrence of a Change of
Control, each holder will have the right to require the Company
to purchase all or any portion (equal to $1,000 or an integral
multiple thereof) of the holders Notes, pursuant to the
offer described below (the Change of Control
Offer), at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of
the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid
interest thereon to the date of purchase (the Change of
Control Payment).
Within 30 days following a Change of Control, the Company
will give notice to each holder of Notes, in the manner
described under the caption Notices, and
the Trustee describing the transaction that constitutes the
Change of Control and offering to purchase the Notes on the date
specified in such notice, which date shall be no earlier than
30 days and no later than 60 days from the date such
notice is given (the Change of Control Payment
Date), pursuant to the procedures required by the
Indenture and described in such notice. The Company will
152
comply with the requirements of
Rule 14e-1 under
the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations
to the extent such laws and regulations are applicable in
connection with the purchase of the Notes as a result of a
Change of Control. To the extent that the provisions of any
securities laws or regulations conflict with the Change of
Control provisions of the Indenture, the Company will comply
with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not
be deemed to have breached its obligations under the Change of
Control provisions of the Indenture by virtue of such conflict.
On or before the Change of Control Payment Date, the Company
will, to the extent lawful:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
accept for payment all Notes or portions thereof properly
tendered pursuant to the Change of Control Offer; |
|
|
(b) |
deposit with the Paying Agent an amount equal to the Change of
Control Payment in respect of all Notes or portions thereof so
tendered; and |
|
|
(c) |
deliver or cause to be delivered to the Trustee the Notes so
accepted together with an Officers Certificate stating the
aggregate principal amount of the Notes or portions thereof
being purchased by the Company. |
The Paying Agent will promptly deliver to each holder of the
Notes so tendered the Change of Control Payment for such Notes,
and the Trustee will promptly authenticate and mail (or cause to
be transferred by book entry) to each holder a new Note equal in
principal amount to any unpurchased portion of the Notes
surrendered, if any; provided, however, that each such
new Note will be in a principal amount of $1,000 or an integral
multiple thereof. The Company will publicly announce the results
of the Change of Control Offer on or as soon as practicable
after the Change of Control Payment Date.
Except as described above with respect to a Change of Control,
the Indenture does not contain provisions that permit the
holders of the Notes to require that the Company purchase or
redeem the Notes in the event of a takeover, recapitalization or
similar transaction. In addition, the Company could enter into
certain transactions, including acquisitions, refinancings or
other recapitalizations, that could affect the Companys
capital structure or the value of the Notes, but that would not
constitute a Change of Control. The occurrence of a Change of
Control may result in a default under the agreement governing
other senior indebtedness of the Company including the term loan
facility, giving the lenders thereunder the right to require the
Company to repay all outstanding obligations thereunder,
possibly limiting the Companys ability to purchase the
Notes upon a Change of Control. The Companys ability to
purchase the Notes following a Change of Control may also be
limited by the Companys then existing financial resources.
Should a Change of Control occur at a time when the Company
lacks sufficient funds to make the Change of Control Payments or
is prohibited from purchasing the Notes under instruments
governing other senior indebtedness (and the Company is unable
to obtain the consent of the holders of such senior indebtedness
or to prepay such senior indebtedness), an Event of Default
would occur under the Indenture. See Events of
Default and Remedies. See Risk Factors
Risks Related to the Notes Although the occurrence
of specific change of control events affecting us will permit
you to require us to repurchase your notes, we may not be able
to repurchase your notes.
The provisions described above that require the Company to make
a Change of Control Offer following a Change of Control will be
applicable regardless of whether any other provisions of the
Indenture are applicable. The Company will not be required to
make a Change of Control Offer following a Change of Control if
a third party makes the Change of Control Offer in the manner,
at the times and otherwise in compliance with the requirements
set forth in the Indenture applicable to a Change of Control
Offer made by the Company and purchases all Notes validly
tendered and not withdrawn under such Change of Control Offer.
A Change of Control will be deemed to have
occurred upon the occurrence of any of the following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition
(other than by merger or consolidation), in one or a series of
related transactions, of all or substantially all of the
properties or assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole; |
|
|
(b) |
the adoption, by holders of Capital Stock of the Company, of a
voluntary plan relating to the liquidation or dissolution of the
Company; |
153
|
|
|
|
(c) |
the consummation of any transaction (including, without
limitation, any merger or consolidation) the result of which is
that any person (as such term is used in
Section 13(d) (3) of the Exchange Act) becomes the
beneficial owner (as such term is defined in
Rule 13d-3 and
Rule 13d-5 under
the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, of more than 50% of the voting power of the
outstanding Voting Stock of the Company; or |
|
|
(d) |
the first day on which more than a majority of the members of
the Board of Directors are not Continuing Directors; |
provided, however, that a transaction in which the
Company becomes a Subsidiary of another Person (other than a
Person that is an individual) shall not constitute a Change of
Control if (1) the shareholders of the Company immediately
prior to such transaction beneficially own (as such
term is defined in
Rule 13d-3 and
Rule 13d-5 under
the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, at least a majority of the voting power of the
outstanding Voting Stock of such other Person immediately
following the consummation of such transaction and
(2) immediately following the consummation of such
transaction, no person (as such term is defined
above), other than such other Person (but including the holders
of the Equity Interests of such other Person),
beneficially owns (as such term is defined above),
directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, more
than 50% of the voting power of the outstanding Voting Stock of
the Company.
Continuing Directors means, as of any date of
determination, any member of the Board of Directors who
(a) was a member of the Board of Directors on the Issue
Date or (b) was nominated for election to the Board of
Directors with the approval of, or whose election to the Board
of Directors was ratified by, at least a majority of the members
of the Board of Directors who were members of the Board of
Directors on the Issue Date or who were so elected to the Board
of Directors thereafter.
The definition of Change of Control includes an event by which
the Company sells, leases, transfers, conveys or otherwise
disposes of all or substantially all of the properties or assets
of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. Although
there is a limited body of case law interpreting the phrase
substantially all, there is no precise established
definition of the phrase under applicable law. Accordingly, the
ability of a holder of Notes to require the Company to
repurchase such Notes as a result of a sale, lease, transfer,
conveyance or other disposition of less than all of the
properties or assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, may be uncertain.
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, consummate an
Asset Sale (excluding for this purpose an Event of Loss) unless:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be,
receives consideration at the time of such Asset Sale at least
equal to the fair market value (as determined in accordance with
the definition of such term set out below under the caption
Certain Definitions, the results of
which determination shall be set forth in an Officers
Certificate delivered to the Trustee) of the assets or Equity
Interests issued or sold or otherwise disposed of; and |
|
|
(b) |
at least 75% of the consideration therefor received by the
Company or such Restricted Subsidiary is in the form of cash or
Cash Equivalents; |
provided, however, that the amount of (1) any
liabilities (as shown on the Companys or such Restricted
Subsidiarys most recent balance sheet) of the Company or
such Restricted Subsidiary (other than contingent liabilities
and liabilities that are by their terms subordinated to the
Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantee) that are assumed by the
transferee of any such assets pursuant to a customary novation
agreement that releases the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary from further liability and (2) any securities,
notes or other obligations received by the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary from such transferee that are converted
within 180 days by the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary into cash (to the extent of the cash received in that
conversion) shall be deemed to be cash for purposes of this
provision.
154
Within 365 days after the receipt of any Net Proceeds from
an Asset Sale (including, without limitation, any Event of
Loss), the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary may apply
such Net Proceeds to (a) permanently repay the principal of
any Indebtedness of the Company ranking in right of payment at
least pari passu with the Notes or any Indebtedness of
such Restricted Subsidiary (provided that if such
Restricted Subsidiary is a Guarantor, then such Indebtedness
shall rank in right of payment at least pari passu with
its Subsidiary Guarantee), (b) make capital expenditures in
respect of Strategic Assets or (c) acquire (including by
way of a purchase of assets or a majority of the Voting Stock of
a Person, by merger, by consolidation or otherwise) Strategic
Assets, provided that if the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary enters into a binding agreement to acquire such
Strategic Assets within such
365-day period, but the
consummation of the transactions under such agreement has not
occurred within such
365-day period and such
agreement has not been terminated, then such
365-day period will be
extended by 90 days to permit such consummation. If such
consummation does not occur, or such agreement is terminated
within such 90-day
extension period, then the Company may apply, or cause such
Restricted Subsidiary to apply, within 90 days after the
end of such initial
90-day extension period
or the effective date of such termination, whichever is earlier,
such Net Proceeds as provided in clauses (a) through
(c) of this paragraph. Pending the final application of any
such Net Proceeds, the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary
may temporarily reduce outstanding revolving credit borrowings
or otherwise invest such Net Proceeds in any manner that is not
prohibited by the Indenture. Any Net Proceeds from Asset Sales
that are not applied or invested as provided in clauses (a)
through (c) of this paragraph will be deemed to constitute
Excess Proceeds.
When the aggregate amount of Excess Proceeds exceeds
10,000,000, the
Company will be required to make an offer to all holders of the
Notes (an Asset Sale Offer) to purchase the
maximum principal amount of the Notes that may be purchased out
of the Excess Proceeds at an offer price in cash in an amount
equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and
unpaid interest thereon to the date of purchase, in accordance
with the procedures set forth in the Indenture; provided,
however, that, if the Company is required to apply such
Excess Proceeds to purchase, or to offer to purchase, any Pari
Passu Indebtedness, the Company shall only be required to offer
to purchase the maximum principal amount of the Notes that may
be purchased out of the amount of such Excess Proceeds
multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the
aggregate principal amount of the Notes outstanding and the
denominator of which is the aggregate principal amount of the
Notes outstanding plus the aggregate principal amount of Pari
Passu Indebtedness outstanding. To the extent that the aggregate
principal amount of the Notes tendered pursuant to an Asset Sale
Offer is less than the amount that the Company is required to
purchase, the Company may use any remaining Excess Proceeds for
general corporate purposes in any manner not prohibited by the
Indenture. If the aggregate principal amount of the Notes
surrendered by holders thereof exceeds the amount that the
Company is required to purchase, the Trustee shall select the
Notes to be purchased on a pro rata basis. Upon completion of
such offer to purchase, the amount of Excess Proceeds shall be
reset at zero.
The Company will not, and will not permit any Restricted
Subsidiary to, enter into or suffer to exist any agreement
(other than any agreement governing the Companys or any
Restricted Subsidiarys Credit Facilities) that would place
any restriction of any kind (other than pursuant to law or
regulation) on the ability of the Company to make an Asset Sale
Offer. The agreements governing the Companys existing
Credit Facilities contain and the agreements governing the
Companys future Credit Facilities may contain prohibitions
of certain events, including events that would constitute a
Change of Control or an Asset Sale. In addition, the exercise by
the holders of Notes of their right to require the Company to
repurchase the Notes upon a Change of Control or an Asset Sale
could cause a default under these other agreements, even if the
Change of Control or Asset Sale itself does not, due to the
financial effect of such repurchases on the Company. Finally,
the Companys ability to pay cash to the holders of Notes
upon a repurchase may be limited by the Companys then
existing financial resources. See Risk Factors
Risks Related to the Notes.
The Company will comply with the requirements of
Rule 14e-1 under
the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations
to the extent such laws and regulations are applicable in
connection with the purchase of the Notes as a result of an
Asset Sale Offer. To the extent that the provisions of any
securities laws or regulations conflict with the Asset Sale
provisions of the Indenture, the Company will comply with the
applicable
155
securities laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have
breached its obligations under the Asset Sale provisions of the
Indenture by virtue of such conflict.
Certain Covenants
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire or retire for value
(including, without limitation, in connection with any merger or
consolidation involving the Company) any Equity Interests of the
Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than any
such Equity Interests owned by the Company or any Wholly Owned
Restricted Subsidiary of the Company); |
|
|
(b) |
make any payment on or with respect to, or purchase, redeem,
defease or otherwise acquire or retire for value, any
Indebtedness that is subordinated in right of payment to the
Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees, except a payment of interest
or principal at Stated Maturity; or |
|
|
(c) |
make any Restricted Investment, |
(all such payments and other actions set forth in
clauses (a) through (c) above being collectively
referred to as Restricted Payments), unless,
at the time of and after giving effect to such Restricted
Payment:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof; |
|
|
(2) |
the Company would, at the time of such Restricted Payment and
after giving pro forma effect thereto as if such Restricted
Payment had been made at the beginning of the applicable
four-quarter period, have been permitted to incur at least
1.00 of
additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio test set forth in the first paragraph of the
covenant described under the caption
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock; and |
|
|
(3) |
such Restricted Payment, together with (x) the aggregate
amount of all other Restricted Payments made by the Company and
its Restricted Subsidiaries after the date of the Indenture
(excluding Restricted Payments permitted by clauses (b)
through (e) and, to the extent deducted in computing
Consolidated Net Income, (f) and (g) of the next
succeeding paragraph) , and (y) the aggregate amount of all
dividends and other payments or distributions paid subsequent to
the Issue Date on account of the Companys or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries Equity Interests (including,
without limitation, any such payment in connection with any
merger or consolidation involving the Company) or to the direct
or indirect holders of the Companys Equity Interests in
their capacity as such (other than (i) dividends or
distributions payable in Equity Interests (other than
Disqualified Stock) of the Company, (ii) dividends or
distributions payable to the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries or (iii) if the Restricted Subsidiary making
such dividend is not a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary,
dividends to its shareholders on a pro rata basis), is less than
the sum (without duplication) of the following: |
|
|
|
|
(A) |
50% of the cumulative Consolidated Net Income of the Company for
the period (taken as one accounting period) from January 1,
2005 to the end of the Companys most recently ended fiscal
quarter for which financial statements are available at the time
of such Restricted Payment (or, if such Consolidated Net Income
for such period is a deficit, less 100% of such deficit); plus |
|
|
(B) |
100% of the aggregate of (1) the net cash proceeds and
(2) the fair market value of Strategic Assets transferred
or conveyed to the Company (as valued at the time of transfer or
conveyance to the Company, and as determined in the manner
contemplated by the definition of the term fair market
value), in each case received by the Company since the
Issue Date as a contribution to its common equity capital or
from the issue or sale of Equity Interests of the Company (other
than Disqualified Stock) or from the issuance or sale of
Disqualified Stock or |
156
|
|
|
|
|
debt securities of the Company that have been converted into, or
exchanged or redeemed for, such Equity Interests (other than any
such Equity Interests, Disqualified Stock or convertible debt
securities sold to a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company and
other than Disqualified Stock or convertible debt securities
that have been converted into, or exchanged or redeemed for,
Disqualified Stock); plus |
|
|
(C) |
to the extent that any Restricted Investment that was made after
the date of the Indenture is sold for cash or otherwise
liquidated or repaid for cash, the cash return of capital with
respect to such Restricted Investment (less the cost of
disposition, if any); plus |
|
|
(D) |
if any Unrestricted Subsidiary is redesignated as a Restricted
Subsidiary, the lesser of (1) an amount equal to the fair
market value of the Investments previously made by the Company
and its Restricted Subsidiaries in such Subsidiary as of the
date of redesignation and (2) the amount of such
Investments. |
The preceding provisions will not prohibit any of the following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the payment of any dividend within 60 days after the date
of declaration thereof if at said date of declaration such
payment would have complied with the provisions of the Indenture; |
|
|
(b) |
the redemption, repurchase, retirement, defeasance or other
acquisition of any subordinated Indebtedness of the Company or
any Guarantor or any Equity Interests of the Company or any of
its Restricted Subsidiaries in exchange for, or out of the net
cash proceeds of the substantially concurrent sale (other than
to a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company) of, other Equity
Interests of the Company (other than any Disqualified Stock),
provided that the amount of any such net cash proceeds
that are utilized for any such redemption, purchase, retirement,
defeasance or other acquisition shall be excluded from
clause (3)(B) of the preceding paragraph; |
|
|
(c) |
the defeasance, redemption, purchase, retirement or other
acquisition of subordinated Indebtedness of the Company or any
Guarantor with the net cash proceeds from an incurrence of, or
in exchange for, Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness; |
|
|
(d) |
the payment of any dividend or distribution by a Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company to the Company or any of its Wholly
Owned Restricted Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(e) |
repurchases of Equity Interests deemed to occur upon exercise of
stock options, if such Equity Interests represent a portion of
the exercise price of such stock options; |
|
|
(f) |
so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing, the
repurchase or other acquisition for value of any Equity
Interests of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company for allocation (as a free allocation or otherwise) to
directors, officers and employees of the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries not in excess of
2,500,000 in any
12-month period; |
|
|
(g) |
so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing, the
repurchase, redemption or other acquisition or retirement for
value of any Equity Interests of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company held by any member of the
Companys (or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries)
management pursuant to any management equity subscription
agreement or stock option agreement in effect as of the Issue
Date; provided that the aggregate price paid for all such
repurchased, redeemed, acquired or retired Equity Interests
shall not exceed
1,000,000 in any
12-month period; |
|
|
(h) |
loans or advances in the ordinary course of business to
Affiliates or Persons with which the Company or a Subsidiary may
have contractual arrangements in any jurisdiction reasonably
necessary to be made in connection with conducting the business
of the Company or a Subsidiary in such jurisdiction in a form
that is customary to address foreign investment regulation or
practice in such jurisdiction, in an aggregate amount not to
exceed 2,000,000
outstanding at any one time; |
|
|
(i) |
so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing, advances
constituting Investments or loans to directors, officers and
employees of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries in the
ordinary |
157
|
|
|
|
|
course of business for bona fide business purposes not in excess
of 1,000,000 at
any one time outstanding; and |
|
|
(j) |
other Restricted Payments not to exceed
15,000,000 in
the aggregate. |
The amount of all Restricted Payments (other than cash) shall be
the fair market value on the date of the Restricted Payment of
the asset(s) or securities proposed to be transferred or issued
by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may
be, pursuant to the Restricted Payment. The fair market value of
any non-cash Restricted Payment shall be determined in the
manner contemplated by the definition of the term fair
market value, and the results of such determination shall
be evidenced by an Officers Certificate delivered to the
Trustee. Not later than 10 business days following the date of
making any Restricted Payment (other than a Restricted Payment
permitted by clauses (b) through (d) of the preceding
paragraph), the Company shall deliver to the Trustee an
Officers Certificate stating that such Restricted Payment
is permitted and setting forth the basis upon which the
calculations required by the covenant Restricted
Payments were computed.
|
|
|
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified
Stock |
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly, create, incur, issue, assume, guarantee or otherwise
become directly or indirectly liable, contingently or otherwise,
with respect to (collectively, incur or an
incurrence) any Indebtedness (including,
without limitation, any Acquired Indebtedness) and that the
Company will not issue any Disqualified Stock and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to issue any shares of
preferred stock; provided, however, that the Company or
any Guarantor may incur Indebtedness or issue Disqualified
Stock, and any Restricted Subsidiary may incur Acquired
Indebtedness, in each case if the Consolidated Interest Coverage
Ratio for the Companys most recently ended four full
fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are
available immediately preceding the date on which such
additional Indebtedness is incurred or such Disqualified Stock
is issued would have been at least 3.0 to 1.0, determined on a
pro forma basis (including a pro forma application of the net
proceeds therefrom), as if the additional Indebtedness or
Disqualified Stock had been issued or incurred, as the case may
be, at the beginning of such four-quarter period.
The preceding paragraph will not apply to the incurrence by the
Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of any of the
following Indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Indebtedness under Credit Facilities in an aggregate principal
amount at any one time outstanding not to exceed the greater of
(x) 125,000,000,
plus any fees, premiums, expenses (including costs of
collection), indemnities and similar amounts payable in
connection with such Indebtedness, and less any amounts derived
from Asset Sales and applied to the permanent reduction of
Indebtedness under Credit Facilities in accordance with the
covenant described under the caption Put
Option of Holders Asset Sales and (y) 10%
of the Companys Consolidated Total Assets; |
|
|
(b) |
Existing Indebtedness; |
|
|
(c) |
Hedging Obligations; |
|
|
(d) |
Indebtedness represented by the Existing Notes or the Subsidiary
Guarantees with respect thereof (but not the Additional Notes
and related guarantees); |
|
|
(e) |
intercompany Indebtedness between or among the Company and any
of its Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiaries, provided that
(1) if the Company or any Guarantor is the obligor on
such Indebtedness, then the Indebtedness must be unsecured and
expressly subordinated to the prior payment in full in cash of
all of the Companys obligations with respect to the Notes
or such Guarantors obligations under its Subsidiary
Guarantee, as the case may be, and (2) any subsequent
issuance or transfer of Equity Interests that results in any
such Indebtedness being held by a Person other than the Company
or a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, or any
sale or other transfer of any such Indebtedness to a Person that
is neither the Company nor a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary
of the Company, shall be deemed, in each case, to constitute an
incurrence of such Indebtedness by the |
158
|
|
|
|
|
Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, as of
the date of such issuance, sale or other transfer that is not
permitted by this clause (e); |
|
|
(f) |
Indebtedness in respect of bid, performance or surety bonds
issued for the account of the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business, including
guarantees or obligations of the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries with respect to letters of credit
supporting such bid, performance or surety obligations (in each
case other than for an obligation for money borrowed); |
|
|
(g) |
Indebtedness represented by Capital Lease Obligations, mortgage
financings or purchase money obligations (or any guarantee
thereof or indemnity with respect thereto), in each case,
incurred for the purpose of financing all or any part of the
purchase price or cost of construction or improvement of
property, plant or equipment used in the business of the Company
or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, in an aggregate principal
amount, including all Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness
incurred to refund, refinance or replace any Indebtedness
incurred pursuant to this clause (g), not to exceed
20,000,000 at
any time outstanding; |
|
|
(h) |
the guarantee by the Company of Indebtedness of any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries or by any Restricted Subsidiary of
Indebtedness of the Company or another Restricted Subsidiary, in
each case, that was permitted to be incurred by another
provision of this covenant; provided that if the
Indebtedness being guaranteed is subordinated in right of
payment to the Notes or a Subsidiary Guarantee then the
guarantee shall be subordinated to the same extent as the
Indebtedness guaranteed; |
|
|
(i) |
intercompany Indebtedness between or among the Company and any
of its Restricted Subsidiaries incurred in the ordinary course
of business in connection with cash pooling or other cash
management arrangements; |
|
|
(j) |
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness incurred in exchange for, or
the net proceeds of which are used to extend, refinance, renew,
replace, defease or refund Indebtedness incurred pursuant to the
first paragraph and clauses (b), (d), (g) and
(j) of the second paragraph of this covenant; |
|
|
(k) |
Indebtedness of Restricted Subsidiaries of the Company (other
than Guarantors) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
5% of the Companys Consolidated Total Assets minus the sum
of all Indebtedness of Restricted Subsidiaries of the Company
(other than Guarantors) then outstanding; and |
|
|
(l) |
any additional Indebtedness of the Company or any Guarantor in
an aggregate principal amount not in excess of
25,000,000 at
any one time outstanding and any guarantee thereof. |
The Indenture also provides that the Company will not, and will
not permit any Guarantor to, directly or indirectly, incur any
Indebtedness which by its terms (or by the terms of any
agreement governing such Indebtedness) is subordinated to any
other Indebtedness of the Company or of such Guarantor, as the
case may be, unless such Indebtedness is also by its terms (or
by the terms of any agreement governing such Indebtedness) made
expressly subordinate to the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees
of such Guarantor, as the case may be, to the same extent and in
the same manner as such Indebtedness is subordinated pursuant to
subordination provisions that are most favorable to the holders
of any other Indebtedness of the Company or of such Guarantor,
as the case may be; provided, however, that no
Indebtedness shall be deemed to be contractually subordinated in
right of payment to any other Indebtedness solely by virtue of
being unsecured.
For purposes of determining compliance with this
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified
Stock covenant, if an item of proposed Indebtedness meets
the criteria of more than one of the categories of Indebtedness
described in clauses (a) through (l) of the second
paragraph, or is entitled to be incurred pursuant to the first
paragraph, of this covenant, the Company will be permitted to
classify such item of Indebtedness on the date of its
incurrence, or later reclassify all or a portion of such item of
Indebtedness, in any manner that complies with this covenant.
159
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any Lien on
any property or asset now owned or hereafter acquired, or any
income or profits therefrom, except Permitted Liens, to secure
(a) any Indebtedness of the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary (if it is not also a Guarantor), unless prior to, or
contemporaneously therewith, the Notes are equally and ratably
secured, or (b) any Indebtedness of any Guarantor, unless
prior to, or contemporaneously therewith, the Subsidiary
Guarantee of such Guarantor is equally and ratably secured;
provided, however, that if such Indebtedness is expressly
subordinated to the Notes or any Subsidiary Guarantee, the Lien
securing such Indebtedness will be subordinated and junior to
the Lien securing the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantee, as the
case may be, with the same relative priority as such
Indebtedness has with respect to the Notes or the Subsidiary
Guarantee. The incurrence of secured Indebtedness by the Company
and its Restricted Subsidiaries is subject to further
limitations on the incurrence of Indebtedness as described under
the caption Incurrence of Indebtedness and
Issuance of Disqualified Stock.
|
|
|
Sale-and-Leaseback Transactions |
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, enter into any
sale-and-leaseback transaction; provided, however, that
the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, as applicable, may
enter into a sale-and-leaseback transaction if:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary could have
(1) incurred Indebtedness in an amount equal to the
Attributable Indebtedness relating to such sale-and-leaseback
transaction pursuant to the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio
test set forth in the first paragraph of the covenant described
above under the caption Incurrence of
Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified Stock and (2)
incurred a Lien to secure such Indebtedness pursuant to the
covenant described under the caption
Liens; |
|
|
(b) |
the gross cash proceeds of such sale-and-leaseback transaction
are at least equal to the fair market value (as determined in
accordance with the definition of such term, the results of
which determination shall be set forth in an Officers
Certificate delivered to the Trustee) of the property that is
the subject of such sale-and-leaseback transaction; and |
|
|
(c) |
the transfer of assets in such sale-and-leaseback transaction is
permitted by, and the Company applies the proceeds of such
transaction in compliance with, the covenant described above
under the caption Put Option of
Holders Asset Sales, if applicable. |
|
|
|
Issuances and Sales of Capital Stock of Restricted
Subsidiaries |
The Indenture provides that the Company (a) will not, and
will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company to,
transfer, convey, sell or otherwise dispose of any Capital Stock
of any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company to any Person other
than the Company or a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company, and (b) will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary
of the Company to issue any of its Equity Interests to any
Person other than to the Company or a Wholly Owned Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company, (except, in the case of both
clauses (a) and (b) above, as required in the manner
described in clause (b) under the definition of
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary, provided that
the business and management of the Restricted Subsidiary is,
by contract or otherwise, controlled by the Company), unless:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the Net Proceeds from such issuance, transfer, conveyance, sale
or other disposition are applied in accordance with the covenant
described above under the caption Put Option
of Holders Asset Sales; and |
|
|
(b) |
immediately after giving effect to such transfer, conveyance,
sale or other disposition, such Restricted Subsidiary either
continues to be a Restricted Subsidiary or, if such Restricted
Subsidiary would no longer constitute a Restricted Subsidiary,
any remaining Investment in such Restricted Subsidiary would
have been permitted to be made under the covenant described
above under the caption Restricted
Payments if made on the date of such transfer, conveyance,
sale or other disposition. |
160
For purposes of this covenant, the creation or perfection of a
Lien on any Capital Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company to secure any Indebtedness of the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries will not be deemed to be a disposition
of such Capital Stock, provided that any sale by the
secured party of such Capital Stock following foreclosure of its
Lien will be subject to this covenant.
|
|
|
Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting
Subsidiaries |
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly, create or otherwise cause or suffer to exist or
become effective any consensual encumbrance or restriction on
the ability of any Restricted Subsidiary to do any of the
following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
(1) pay dividends or make any other distributions to the
Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries on its Capital
Stock or (2) pay any Indebtedness owed to the Company or
any of its Restricted Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(b) |
make loans or advances to the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries; or |
|
|
(c) |
transfer any of its properties or assets to the Company or any
of its Restricted Subsidiaries, |
except for such encumbrances or restrictions existing under or
by reason of:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
agreements governing Credit Facilities or Existing Indebtedness,
and any amendments, modifications, restatements, renewals,
increases, supplements, refundings, replacements or refinancings
thereof, provided that such agreements and amendments,
modifications, restatements, renewals, increases, supplements,
refundings, replacements or refinancings are not materially less
favorable to the holders of the Notes, taken as a whole, with
respect to such dividend and other payment restrictions, than
those contained, in the case of Credit Facilities, in agreements
governing Credit Facilities or, in the case of Existing
Indebtedness, in agreements governing such Existing
Indebtedness, in either case as in effect on the date of the
Indenture; |
|
|
(2) |
the Indenture, the Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees; |
|
|
(3) |
any agreement for the sale or other disposition of Equity
Interests in a Restricted Subsidiary that restricts
distributions by that Restricted Subsidiary pending the sale or
other disposition; |
|
|
(4) |
any instrument governing Indebtedness or Capital Stock of a
Person acquired by the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries as in effect at the time of such acquisition
(except to the extent such Indebtedness was incurred in
connection with or in contemplation of such acquisition), which
encumbrance or restriction is not applicable to any Person or
the properties or assets of any Person, other than the Person,
or the property or assets of the Person, so acquired,
provided that, in the case of Indebtedness, such
Indebtedness was permitted by the terms of the Indenture to be
incurred; |
|
|
(5) |
by reason of customary provisions restricting the subletting or
assignment of any lease or the transfer of copyrighted or
patented materials; |
|
|
(6) |
purchase money obligations for property acquired in the ordinary
course of business that impose restrictions of the nature
described in clause (c) above on the property so acquired; |
|
|
(7) |
customary provisions in agreements for the sale of property or
assets; |
|
|
(8) |
customary provisions in agreements that restrict the assignment
of such agreements or rights thereunder; |
|
|
(9) |
provisions with respect to the disposition or distribution of
assets or property in any joint venture agreement, assets sale
agreement, stock sale agreement or other similar agreement in
each case entered into in the ordinary course of business, but
in each case only to the extent such encumbrance or restriction
relates to the transfer of the property, or encumbers or
restricts the assets, subject to such agreement; |
161
|
|
|
|
(10) |
restrictions on cash or other deposits or net worth imposed by
customers under contracts entered into in the ordinary course of
business; |
|
|
(11) |
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness, provided that the
encumbrances and restrictions contained in the agreements
governing such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness are not
materially less favorable to the holders of the Notes, taken as
a whole, than those contained in the agreements governing the
Indebtedness being refinanced; |
|
|
(12) |
any Liens not prohibited by the covenant described above under
the caption Liens that limit the right
of the debtor to dispose of the assets subject to such
Liens; or |
|
|
(13) |
applicable law. |
|
|
|
Transactions with Affiliates |
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, make any payment
to, or sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of any of its
properties or assets to, or purchase any property or assets
from, or enter into or make or amend any transaction, contract,
agreement, understanding, loan, advance or guarantee with, or
for the benefit of, any Affiliate (each of the foregoing, an
Affiliate Transaction), unless:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
such Affiliate Transaction is in writing and on terms that, when
taken as a whole, are no less favorable to the Company or the
relevant Restricted Subsidiary than those that would have been
obtained in a comparable transaction by the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary with an unrelated Person or, if there is
no such comparable transaction, on terms that are fair and
reasonable to the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary; and |
|
|
(b) |
the Company delivers to the Trustee (1) with respect to any
Affiliate Transaction or series of related Affiliate
Transactions involving aggregate consideration in excess of
2,000,000, an
Officers Certificate certifying that such Affiliate
Transaction complies with clause (a) above and
(2) with respect to any Affiliate Transaction or series of
related Affiliate Transactions involving aggregate consideration
in excess of
5,000,000, a
resolution of the Board of Directors set forth in an
Officers Certificate certifying that such Affiliate
Transaction complies with clause (a) above and that such
Affiliate Transaction has been approved by a majority of the
disinterested members of the Board of Directors and
(3) with respect to any Affiliate Transaction or series of
related Affiliate Transactions involving aggregate consideration
in excess of
15,000,000, an
opinion as to the fairness to the Company or the relevant
Subsidiary of such Affiliate Transaction from a financial point
of view issued by an accounting, appraisal or investment banking
firm that is, in the judgment of the Board of Directors,
qualified to render such opinion and is independent with respect
to the Company; |
provided, however, that the following shall be deemed not
to be Affiliate Transactions:
|
|
|
|
(A) |
any employment agreement or other employee compensation plan or
arrangement (including stock option plans) entered into by the
Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in the ordinary
course of business of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary; |
|
|
(B) |
transactions between or among the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries (including any Person that becomes a Restricted
Subsidiary as a result of any such transaction); |
|
|
(C) |
loans or advances to officers, directors and employees of the
Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries made in the
ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices
of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries in an aggregate
amount not to exceed
1,000,000
outstanding at any one time; |
|
|
(D) |
indemnities of officers, directors and employees of the Company
or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries permitted by provisions of
the organizational documents of the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary or applicable law; |
162
|
|
|
|
(E) |
the payment of reasonable and customary regular fees to
directors of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries
who are not employees of the Company or any Subsidiary; |
|
|
(F) |
any agreement or arrangement in effect as of the Issue Date or
any amendment thereto or replacement thereof or any transaction
contemplated thereby (including pursuant to any amendment or
replacement agreement) so long as any such amendment or
replacement agreement, taken as a whole, is no more
disadvantageous to the holders of the Notes in any material
respect than the original agreement as in effect on the Issue
Date; and |
|
|
|
|
(G) |
Restricted Payments and Permitted Investments that are permitted
by the provisions of the Indenture described above under the
caption Restricted Payments. |
|
|
|
Guarantees of Certain Indebtedness by Restricted
Subsidiaries |
The Indenture provides that the Company will not permit any
Restricted Subsidiary, directly or indirectly, to guarantee any
Indebtedness of the Company or any Guarantor (the Other
Company Indebtedness) other than Permitted Guarantees
unless such Restricted Subsidiary (if it is not already a
Guarantor) contemporaneously executes a Subsidiary Guarantee,
which Subsidiary Guarantee will be senior to such Restricted
Subsidiarys guarantee of such Other Company Indebtedness
if such Other Company Indebtedness so guaranteed is subordinated
Indebtedness.
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries to, engage in the conduct of any business other
than the business being conducted on the Issue Date and such
other businesses as are reasonably necessary or desirable to
facilitate the conduct and operation of, or ancillary or
reasonably related to, such businesses, except to the extent as
would not be material to the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
The Indenture provides that the Company will not and will not
permit any Guarantor to incur, directly or indirectly, any
Indebtedness that is subordinated in right of payment to any
Indebtedness of the Company or the Guarantor, as the case may
be, unless the Indebtedness so incurred is either pari passu
with, or subordinated in right of payment to, the Notes or
the relevant Subsidiary Guarantee, as the case may be.
Unsecured Indebtedness will not be deemed to be subordinated in
right of payment to secured Indebtedness solely because it is
unsecured, and Indebtedness that is not guaranteed by a
particular Person is not deemed to be subordinated in right of
payment to Indebtedness that is so guaranteed solely because it
is not so guaranteed.
Whether or not the Company is required to do so by the rules and
regulations of the Commission, the Company will file with the
Commission (unless the Commission will not accept such a filing):
|
|
|
|
(i) |
within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules
and regulations, all annual financial and other information with
respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries that would be
required to be contained in a filing with the Commission on
Form 20-F,
including a Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and a report
thereon by the Companys certified independent
accountants; and |
|
|
(ii) |
within 60 days after the end of each of the first and third
quarters of each fiscal year (and within 75 days after the
end of the second quarter of each fiscal year), reports on
Form 6-K, or any
successor form, attaching (a) unaudited consolidated
financial statements for the Company for the period then ended
(and the comparable period in the prior year), in each case
prepared in accordance with GAAP (as in effect on the date of
such report or financial information) including either, to the
extent permitted under applicable law and SEC regulations
(i) a reconciliation to accounting principles |
163
|
|
|
|
|
generally accepted in the United States
(U.S. GAAP) in substantially the form
set out in the
Form 20-F of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 dated on or
about April 18, 2005 or (ii) a reconciliation of
EBITDA to U.S. GAAP; provided that, in either case,
such reconciliation shall be made to U.S. GAAP as in effect
on the date of such report or financial information and
(b) the information relating to the Company described in
Item 5 of
Form 20-F (i.e.,
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects). |
Within 15 days of filing, or attempting to file, such
information with the Commission, the Company shall furnish such
information to the holders of the Notes.
For so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock
Exchange and the rules of such stock exchange so require, the
above information will also be made available in Luxembourg,
free of charge, through the offices of the Paying Agent in
Luxembourg.
In addition, for so long as any Notes remain outstanding and
during any period during which the Company is not subject to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act nor exempt
therefrom pursuant to
Rule 12g3-2(b),
the Company and the Guarantors will furnish to the holders of
the Notes and prospective purchasers of the Notes, upon their
request, the information required to be delivered pursuant to
Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act.
|
|
|
Future Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted
Subsidiaries |
The preceding covenants (including calculation of financial
ratios and the determination of limitations on the incurrence of
Indebtedness) may be affected by the designation by the Company
of any existing or future Subsidiary of the Company as an
Unrestricted Subsidiary, or by the redesignation by the Company
of an Unrestricted Subsidiary as a Restricted Subsidiary.
The Board of Directors may designate any Restricted Subsidiary
to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary if such designation would not
cause a Default. For purposes of making such designation, all
outstanding Investments by the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries in the Subsidiary so designated will be deemed to
be Restricted Payments at the time of such designation, in an
amount equal to the fair market value of such Investments at the
time of such designation. Such designation will only be
permitted if such Restricted Payments would be permitted by the
terms of the Indenture at such time and if such Restricted
Subsidiary otherwise meets the definition of Unrestricted
Subsidiary. The Company may not designate any Restricted
Subsidiary to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary at any time during
which the Company maintains Investment Grade Status.
The Board of Directors may also redesignate any Unrestricted
Subsidiary to be a Restricted Subsidiary if such redesignation
complies with the requirements of the Indenture described in the
definition of Unrestricted Subsidiary. If the
aggregate amount of all Restricted Payments calculated for
purposes of the first paragraph of the covenant described under
the caption Restricted Payments above
includes an Investment in an Unrestricted Subsidiary that
subsequently becomes a Restricted Subsidiary pursuant to the
terms of this paragraph, then the aggregate amount of such
Restricted Payments will be reduced by the lesser of (a) an
amount equal to the fair market value of the Investments
previously made by the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries
in such Unrestricted Subsidiary at the time it becomes a
Restricted Subsidiary and (b) the amount of such
Investments.
Any designation or redesignation pursuant to this covenant by
the Board of Directors will be evidenced by the filing with the
Trustee of a Board Resolution giving effect to such action and
evidencing the valuation of any Investment relating thereto (as
determined in good faith by the Board of Directors) and an
Officers Certificate certifying that such action and
valuation complied with the preceding requirements.
Effectiveness of Covenants and Events of Default
The covenants described under clauses (c) and
(d) under Subsidiary
Guarantees Merger or Consolidation,
Certain Covenants Restricted
Payments, Certain Covenants
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified
Stock, Certain Covenants
Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting
Subsidiaries, Certain
Covenants Transactions with Affiliates,
Certain Covenants Conduct of
Business, Put Option of
Holders Asset Sales, clauses (a)(1),
(b) and (c) under Certain
164
Covenants Sale-and-Leaseback Transactions, and
Certain Covenants Issuances and
Sales of Capital Stock of Restricted Subsidiaries and the
Events of Default described under clauses (e) and (f)(4)
under Events of Default and Remedies
(collectively, the Suspended Provisions) will
no longer be in effect upon the Company attaining Investment
Grade Status. If at any time the Companys credit rating is
downgraded from Investment Grade Status, then the Suspended
Provisions will thereafter be reinstated as if such covenants
had never been suspended and be applicable pursuant to the terms
of the Indenture (including in connection with performing any
calculation or assessment to determine compliance with the terms
of the Indenture), unless and until the Company subsequently
attains Investment Grade Status (in which event the Suspended
Provisions shall again no longer be in effect for such time that
the Company maintains Investment Grade Status); provided,
however, that no Default, Event of Default or breach of any
kind shall be deemed to exist under the Indenture with respect
to the Suspended Provisions based on, and none of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries shall bear any liability for, any
actions taken or events occurring after the Company attains
Investment Grade Status and before any reinstatement of such
Suspended Provisions as provided above, or any actions taken at
any time pursuant to any contractual obligation arising prior to
such reinstatement, regardless of whether such actions or events
would have been permitted if the applicable Suspended Provisions
remained in effect during such period. There can be no assurance
that the Notes will ever achieve Investment Grade Status or that
any such rating, if achieved, will be maintained.
Events of Default and Remedies
The Indenture provides that each of the following constitutes an
Event of Default:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
default for 30 days in the payment when due of interest on
the Notes; |
|
|
(b) |
default in payment when due of the principal of or premium, if
any, on the Notes; |
|
|
(c) |
failure by the Company to comply with the provisions described
under the caption Put Option of Holders; |
|
|
(d) |
failure by the Company for 30 days after it receives
written notice from the Trustee or at least 25% in principal
amount of the then outstanding Notes to comply with any of its
other agreements in the Indenture or the Notes; |
|
|
(e) |
the declaration or payment of any dividend or the making of any
other payment or distribution described in
subclause (y) of clause (3) under the caption
Certain Covenants Restricted
Payments, which declaration, payment or distribution would
not be permitted by the provisions described under the caption
Certain Covenants Restricted
Payments if it were treated as a Restricted Payment; |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
the Company consolidates or merges (fusion) with or into
(whether or not the Company is the surviving corporation), or
sells, assigns, transfers, leases, conveys, demerges
(scission) or otherwise disposes of all or substantially
all of its properties or assets in one or more related
transactions, to another Person unless: |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
the Company is the surviving corporation or the Person formed by
or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than the
Company) or to which such sale, assignment, transfer, lease,
conveyance, demerger or other disposition shall have been made
is a corporation organized or existing under the laws of the
United States (or any state thereof or the District of
Columbia), the Republic of France or any other member state of
the European Union (as constituted on the Issue Date); |
|
|
(2) |
the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or
merger (if other than the Company) or the Person to which such
sale, assignment, transfer, lease, conveyance, demerger or other
disposition shall have been made assumes all the obligations of
the Company under the Notes and the Indenture pursuant to a
supplemental indenture in a form reasonably satisfactory to the
Trustee; |
|
|
(3) |
immediately after such transaction no Default or Event of
Default exists; |
165
|
|
|
|
(4) |
except in the case of a merger of the Company with or into a
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, the Company
or the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or
merger (if other than the Company), or to which such sale,
assignment, transfer, lease, conveyance, demerger or other
disposition shall have been made: |
|
|
|
|
(A) |
will have a Consolidated Net Worth immediately after the
transaction equal to or greater than the Consolidated Net Worth
of the Company immediately preceding the transaction; and |
|
|
|
|
(B) |
will, at the time of such transaction and after giving pro forma
effect thereto as if such transaction had occurred at the
beginning of the applicable four-quarter period, be permitted to
incur at least
1.00 of
additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio test set forth in the first paragraph of the
covenant described above under the caption
Certain Covenants Incurrence of
Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified Stock; and |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
the Company shall deliver to the Trustee an Officers
Certificate and an opinion of counsel stating that such
consolidation, merger or disposition and any supplemental
indenture in respect thereto comply with this provision and that
all conditions precedent in the Indenture relating to such
transaction or transactions have been complied with; |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
default under any mortgage, indenture or instrument under which
there may be issued or by which there may be secured or
evidenced any Indebtedness for money borrowed by the Company or
any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (or the payment of which is
guaranteed by the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries), whether such Indebtedness or guarantee exists on
the date of the Indenture or is created after the date of the
Indenture, which default (1) is caused by a failure to pay
principal of or premium or interest on such Indebtedness prior
to the expiration of any grace period provided in such
Indebtedness, including any extension thereof (a
Payment Default), or (2) results in the
acceleration of such Indebtedness prior to its express maturity
and, in each case, the principal amount of any such
Indebtedness, together with the principal amount of any other
such Indebtedness under which there has been a Payment Default
or the maturity of which has been so accelerated, aggregates in
excess of
10,000,000 and
provided, further, that if any such default is cured or
waived or any such acceleration rescinded, or such Indebtedness
is repaid, within a period of 10 days from the continuation
of such default beyond the applicable grace period or the
occurrence of such acceleration, as the case may be, such Event
of Default and any consequential acceleration of the Notes shall
be automatically rescinded, so long as such rescission does not
conflict with any judgment or decree; |
|
|
(h) |
failure by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to
pay final judgments (not covered by insurance) aggregating in
excess of
10,000,000,
which judgments are not paid, discharged or stayed for a period
of 60 days; |
|
|
|
|
(i) |
failure by any Guarantor to perform any covenant set forth in
its Subsidiary Guarantee, or the repudiation by any Guarantor of
its obligations under its Subsidiary Guarantee or the
unenforceability of any Subsidiary Guarantee for any reason
other than as provided in the Indenture; and |
|
|
(j) |
certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to the
Company or any Significant Subsidiary. |
If any Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee or
the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then
outstanding Notes may declare all the Notes to be due and
payable immediately. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case
of an Event of Default arising from certain events of bankruptcy
or insolvency with respect to the Company or any Significant
Subsidiary, all outstanding Notes will become due and payable
without further action or notice. The holders of a majority in
principal amount of the then outstanding Notes by written notice
to the Trustee may on behalf of all of the holders rescind an
acceleration and its consequences if the rescission would not
conflict with any judgment or decree and if all existing Events
of Default (except non-payment of principal, interest or premium
that have become due solely because of such acceleration) have
been cured or waived. Holders of the Notes may not enforce the
Indenture or the Notes except as provided in the Indenture.
Subject to certain limitations, holders of a majority in
principal amount of the then
166
outstanding Notes may direct the Trustee in its exercise of any
trust or power. The Trustee may withhold from holders of the
Notes notice of any continuing Default or Event of Default
(except a Default or Event of Default relating to the payment of
principal or interest) if it determines that withholding notice
is in their interest.
In the case of any Event of Default occurring by reason of any
willful action (or inaction) taken (or not taken) by or on
behalf of the Company with the intention of avoiding payment of
the premium that the Company would have had to pay if the
Company then had elected to redeem the Notes pursuant to the
optional redemption provisions of the Indenture, an equivalent
premium shall also become and be immediately due and payable to
the extent permitted by law upon the acceleration of the Notes.
The holders of a majority in principal amount of the Notes then
outstanding by notice to the Trustee may on behalf of the
holders of all of the Notes waive any existing Default or Event
of Default and its consequences under the Indenture except a
continuing Default or Event of Default in the payment of the
principal of or interest on the Notes.
The Company will be required to deliver to the Trustee annually
a statement regarding compliance with the Indenture, and the
Company will be required, upon becoming aware of any Default or
Event of Default, to deliver to the Trustee a statement
specifying such Default or Event of Default.
No Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees and
Stockholders
No director, officer, employee, incorporator, member, partner or
stockholder or other owner of Capital Stock of the Company or
any Guarantor, as such, shall have any liability for any
obligations of the Company or any Guarantor under the Notes, the
Subsidiary Guarantees or the Indenture or for any claim based
on, in respect of, or by reason of, such obligations or their
creation. Each holder of the Notes by accepting a Note waives
and releases all such liability. The waiver and release are part
of the consideration for issuance of the Notes. Such waiver may
not be effective to waive liabilities under the federal
securities laws, and it is the view of the Commission that such
a waiver is against public policy.
Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance
The Company may, at its option and at any time, elect to have
all of the obligations of itself and the Guarantors discharged
with respect to the outstanding Notes and the Subsidiary
Guarantees, respectively (Legal Defeasance),
except for:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the rights of holders of outstanding Notes to receive payments
in respect of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest
on such Notes when such payments are due from the trust referred
to below; |
|
|
(b) |
the Companys obligations with respect to the Notes
concerning issuing temporary Notes, registration of transfer or
exchange of the Notes, mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen
Notes and the maintenance of an office or agency for payment and
money for security payments held in trust; |
|
|
(c) |
the rights, powers, trusts, duties and immunities of the
Trustee, and the Companys and any Guarantors
obligations in connection with them; and |
|
|
(d) |
the Legal Defeasance provisions of the Indenture. |
In addition, the Company may, at its option and at any time,
elect to have the obligations of the Company and any Guarantor
released with respect to certain covenants that are described in
the Indenture (Covenant Defeasance), and
thereafter any omission to comply with such obligations shall
not constitute a Default or Event of Default with respect to the
Notes. If Covenant Defeasance occurs, certain other events (not
including non-payment, bankruptcy, receivership, rehabilitation
and insolvency events) described under the caption
Events of Default and Remedies will no
longer constitute an Event of Default with respect to the Notes.
In order to exercise either Legal Defeasance or Covenant
Defeasance:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
the Company must irrevocably deposit with the Trustee, in trust,
for the benefit of the holders of the Notes, cash in
U.S. dollars, non-callable U.S. Government Securities,
or a combination thereof, in |
167
|
|
|
|
|
such amounts as will be sufficient, in the opinion of an
internationally recognized firm of independent public
accountants, to pay the principal of and premium and interest on
the outstanding Notes on the Stated Maturity or on the
applicable redemption date, as the case may be, and the Company
must specify whether the Notes are being defeased to maturity or
to a particular redemption date; |
|
|
(2) |
in the case of Legal Defeasance, the Company shall have
delivered to the Trustee an opinion of counsel reasonably
acceptable to the Trustee confirming that (A) the Company
has received from, or there has been published by, the Internal
Revenue Service and the French tax authority a ruling or
(B) since the date of the Indenture, there has been a
change in the applicable income tax law, in either case to the
effect that, and based thereon such opinion of counsel shall
confirm that, the holders of the outstanding Notes will not
recognize income, gain or loss for U.S. federal or French
income tax purposes, respectively, as a result of such Legal
Defeasance and will be subject to U.S. federal or French
income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the
same times as would have been the case if such Legal Defeasance
had not occurred; |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
in the case of Covenant Defeasance, the Company shall have
delivered to the Trustee an opinion of counsel reasonably
acceptable to the Trustee confirming that the holders of the
outstanding Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for
U.S. federal or French income tax purposes as a result of
such Covenant Defeasance and will be subject to
U.S. federal or French income tax on the same amounts, in
the same manner and at the same times as would have been the
case if such Covenant Defeasance had not occurred; |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing either (A) on the date of such deposit (other
than a Default or Event of Default resulting from the borrowing
of funds to be applied to such deposit) or (B) insofar as
Events of Default from bankruptcy or insolvency events are
concerned, at any time in the period ending on the
550th day after the date of deposit; |
|
|
(5) |
such Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance will not result in
a breach or violation of, or constitute a default under any
material agreement or instrument (other than the Indenture) to
which the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries is a
party or by which the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries is bound; |
|
|
(6) |
the Company must have delivered to the Trustee an opinion of
counsel to the effect that, after the 550th day following
the deposit, the trust funds will not be subject to the effect
of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or
similar laws affecting creditors rights generally; |
|
|
(7) |
the Company must deliver to the Trustee an Officers
Certificate stating that the deposit was not made by the Company
with the intent of preferring the holders of the Notes over the
other creditors of the Company or with the intent of defeating,
hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors of the Company or
others; and |
|
|
(8) |
the Company must deliver to the Trustee an Officers
Certificate and an opinion of counsel, each stating that all
conditions precedent provided for relating to the Legal
Defeasance or the Covenant Defeasance have been complied with. |
Transfer and Exchange
A holder of the Notes may transfer or exchange the Notes in
accordance with the Indenture. The Registrar and the Trustee may
require a holder, among other things, to furnish appropriate
endorsements and transfer documents and the Company may require
a holder to pay any taxes and fees required by law or permitted
by the Indenture. The Company will not be required to transfer
or exchange any Note selected for redemption. Also, the Company
will not be required to transfer or exchange any Note for a
period of 15 days before a selection of Notes to be
redeemed.
The registered holder of a Note will be treated as the owner of
it for all purposes, and all references to holders
in this Description of the Additional Notes are to
registered holders unless otherwise indicated.
168
Amendment and Waiver
Except as provided below, the Indenture or the Notes may be
amended or supplemented with the consent of the holders of at
least a majority in principal amount of the Notes then
outstanding (including, without limitation, consents obtained in
connection with a purchase of, or tender offer or exchange offer
for, the Notes), and any existing default or compliance with any
provision of the Indenture or the Notes may be waived with the
consent of the holders of a majority in principal amount of the
then outstanding Notes (including, without limitation, consents
obtained in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer for
the Notes).
Without the consent of each holder affected, an amendment,
supplement or waiver may not (with respect to any Notes held by
a non-consenting holder):
|
|
|
|
(a) |
reduce the principal amount of the Notes whose holders must
consent to an amendment, supplement or waiver; |
|
|
(b) |
reduce the principal of or change the fixed maturity of any Note
or alter the provisions with respect to the redemption or
purchase of the Notes by the Company; |
|
|
(c) |
reduce the rate of or change the time for payment of interest on
any Note; |
|
|
(d) |
waive a Default or Event of Default in the payment of principal
of or premium or interest on the Notes (except a rescission of
acceleration of the Notes by the holders of at least a majority
in principal amount of the Notes and a waiver of the payment
default that resulted from such acceleration); |
|
|
(e) |
make any Note payable in money other than that stated in the
Notes; |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
make any change in the provisions of the Indenture relating to
waivers of past defaults or the rights of holders of the Notes
to receive payments of principal of or premium or interest on
the Notes; |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
waive a redemption or repurchase payment with respect to any
Note; |
|
|
(h) |
make any change in the ranking of the Notes relative to other
Indebtedness of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantees
relative to other Indebtedness of the Guarantors, in either case
in a manner adverse to the holders; |
|
|
|
|
(i) |
release any Guarantor from any of its obligations under its
Subsidiary Guarantee or the Indenture, except in accordance with
the terms of the Indenture; |
|
|
|
|
(j) |
make any change in the provisions described under the caption
Additional Amounts in a manner adverse
to the holders; or |
|
|
(k) |
make any change in the preceding amendment, supplement and
waiver provisions. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, without the consent of any holder
of the Notes, the Company, the Guarantors and the Trustee may
amend or supplement the Indenture or the Notes to cure any
ambiguity, defect or inconsistency, to provide for
uncertificated Notes in addition to or in place of certificated
Notes, to provide for the assumption of the Companys
obligations to holders of the Notes in the case of a merger or
consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the
Companys properties or assets, to make any change that
would provide any additional rights or benefits to the holders
of the Notes or that does not materially adversely affect the
legal rights under the Indenture of any such holder, to secure
the Notes pursuant to the requirements of the covenant described
above under the caption Certain
Covenants Liens, to add any Guarantor or to
release any Guarantor from its Subsidiary Guarantee, in each
case as provided in the Indenture, or to comply with
requirements of the Commission in order to effect or maintain
the qualification of the Indenture under the Trust Indenture Act.
Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries shall, directly
or indirectly, pay or cause to be paid any consideration,
whether by way of interest, fee or otherwise, to any holder of
any Notes for or as an inducement to any consent, waiver,
amendment or supplement of any terms or provisions of the
Indenture or the Notes, unless such consideration is offered to
be paid or agreed to be paid to all holders of the Notes which
so consent, waive or
169
agree to amend or supplement in the time frame set forth in
solicitation documents relating to such consent, waiver or
agreement.
Satisfaction and Discharge
The Indenture will be discharged and will cease to be of further
effect as to all Notes issued thereunder, when:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
all Notes that have been authenticated (except lost, stolen or
destroyed Notes that have been replaced or paid and Notes for
whose payment money has theretofore been deposited in trust and
thereafter repaid to the Company) have been delivered to the
Trustee for cancellation; or |
|
|
(b) |
all Notes that have not been delivered to the Trustee for
cancellation have become due and payable by reason of the giving
of a notice of redemption or otherwise or will become due and
payable within one year and the Company or any Guarantor has
irrevocably deposited or caused to be irrevocably deposited with
the Trustee as trust funds in trust solely for the benefit of
the holders of the Notes, cash in U.S. dollars,
non-callable U.S. Government Securities, or a combination
thereof, in such amounts as will be sufficient without
consideration of any reinvestment of interest, to pay and
discharge the entire indebtedness on the Notes not previously
delivered to the Trustee for cancellation, including principal,
premium, if any, and accrued interest to the date of maturity or
redemption; |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing on the date of such deposit or shall occur as a
result of such deposit and such deposit will not result in a
breach or violation of, or constitute a default under, any other
instrument to which the Company or any Guarantor is a party or
by which the Company or any Guarantor is bound; |
|
|
(3) |
the Company and each Guarantor has paid or caused to be paid all
other sums payable by it under the Indenture; and |
|
|
(4) |
the Company has delivered an Officers Certificate and an
opinion of counsel to the Trustee stating that all conditions
precedent to satisfaction and discharge have been satisfied. |
The Trustee
The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association
(formerly JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association) serves as
trustee under the Indenture.
The Indenture contains certain limitations on the rights of the
Trustee, should it become a creditor of the Company or any
Guarantor, to obtain payment of claims in certain cases, or to
realize on certain property received in respect of any such
claim as security or otherwise. The Trustee will be permitted to
engage in other transactions; however, if it acquires any
conflicting interest and a Default occurs it must eliminate such
conflict within 90 days, apply to the Commission for
permission to continue as Trustee or resign.
The holders of a majority in principal amount of the then
outstanding Notes will have the right to direct the time, method
and place of conducting any proceeding for exercising any remedy
available to the Trustee, subject to certain exceptions. The
Indenture provides that in case an Event of Default shall occur
(that is not cured), the Trustee will be required, in the
exercise of its power, to use the degree of care of a prudent
man in the conduct of his own affairs. Subject to such
provisions, the Trustee will be under no obligation to exercise
any of its rights or powers under the Indenture at the request
of any holder of Notes, unless such holder has offered to the
Trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to it against any
loss, liability or expense.
Governing Law
The Indenture, the Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees will be
governed by the laws of the State of New York.
170
Consent to Jurisdiction
The Indenture provides that any suit, action or proceeding with
respect to the Indenture, the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees
may be brought in any New York state or federal court located in
the Borough of Manhattan in the City of New York (New
York Court) and that the Company and the Guarantors
will submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of such courts.
Enforceability of Judgments; Indemnification for Foreign
Currency Judgments
A significant portion of the assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries is outside the United States, so any judgment
obtained in the United States against the Company or any
Guarantor, including judgments relating to payments with respect
to the Notes, may not be fully collectible within the United
States.
The Company has been informed by its French counsel that a final
judgment for a sum of money in relation to the Indenture or the
Notes obtained in any New York Court would be recognized and
enforceable by the French courts without re-examination or
re-litigation of the matters adjudicated, through an action for
exequatur brought before the competent French court
provided that the court is satisfied that the
requirements developed by case law for the enforcement of
foreign judgments in France are met, and in particular provided
that:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the judgment concerned is enforceable in the State of New York; |
|
|
(b) |
such judgment has been rendered by a court having jurisdiction
over the parties both under its own rules of jurisdiction and in
accordance with French rules of international conflicts of
jurisdiction and the French courts did not have exclusive
jurisdiction to hear the matter; |
|
|
(c) |
the court that rendered such judgment has applied to the merits
of the case the laws of the jurisdiction which would have been
considered appropriate under French rules of international
conflicts of laws; |
|
|
(d) |
the judgment is not contrary to French international public
policy (ordre public international), both pertaining to
the merits and to the procedure of the case; |
|
|
(e) |
the judgment is not tainted with fraud; and |
|
|
(f) |
the judgment does not conflict with a French judgment or a
foreign judgment which has become effective in France and there
is no risk of conflict with proceedings pending before the
French courts at the time enforcement of the judgment is sought. |
The Indenture also provides that obligations of the Company to
any holder of the Notes or the Trustee shall, notwithstanding
any judgment in a currency (the Judgment
Currency) other than United States dollars (the
Agreement Currency), be discharged only to
the extent that on the day following receipt by such holder of
the Notes or the Trustee, as the case may be, of any amount in
the Judgment Currency, such holder of the Notes or the Trustee
may in accordance with normal banking procedures purchase the
Agreement Currency with the Judgment Currency. If the amount of
the Agreement Currency so purchased is less than the amount
originally to be paid to such holder of the Notes or the
Trustee, as the case may be, in the Agreement Currency, the
Company agrees, as a separate obligation and notwithstanding
such judgment, to pay to such holder of Notes or the Trustee, as
the case may be, the difference, and if the amount of the
Agreement Currency so purchased exceeds the amount originally to
be paid to such holder of the Notes or the Trustee, as the case
may be, such holder of the Notes or the Trustee, as the case may
be, agrees to pay to or for the account of the Company such
excess, provided that such holder of the Notes or the Trustee,
as the case may be, shall not have any obligation to pay any
such excess as long as a default by the Company or any Guarantor
in its obligations under the Notes, the Indenture or the
Subsidiary Guarantees has occurred and is continuing, in which
case such excess may be applied by such holder of the Notes or
the Trustee, as the case may be, to such obligations.
Additional Information
Anyone who receives this prospectus may obtain a copy of the
Indenture without charge by contacting Compagnie
Générale de Géophysique-Veritas, Tour
Maine-Montparnasse, 33 avenue de Maine, BP 191, 75755 Paris
CEDEX 15, France, Attention: Investor Relations Officer,
Telephone (33) 1 64 47 45 00.
171
Book Entry, Delivery and Form
The Additional Notes will initially be represented by a note in
global form that will represent the aggregate principal amount
of the Additional Notes (the Global Note).
When issued, the Global Note will be deposited with the Trustee
and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the
nominee for The Depository Trust Company
(DTC) nominee. Except as set forth below,
record ownership of the Global Note may be transferred, in whole
or in part, only to another nominee of DTC or to a successor of
DTC or its nominee.
The Additional Notes will be issued only in registered form and
in minimum denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples of
$1,000 in excess thereof. The Additional Notes will be issued on
the Closing Date only against payment in immediately available
funds.
Investors may hold their interests in the Global Note directly
through DTC if they are DTC participants (the
Participants) or indirectly through
organizations that are DTC participants (the Indirect
Participants).
Investors may also hold their interests in the Global Note
directly through Euroclear Bank S.A./ N.V., as operator of the
Euroclear System or Clearstream Banking
(Euroclear), if they are participants in
these systems, or indirectly through organizations that are
participants in these systems.
So long as Cede & Co., as the nominee of DTC, is the
registered owner of the Global Note, Cede & Co. for all
purposes (except with respect to the determination of Additional
Amounts payable) will be considered the sole holder of the
Global Note. Owners of beneficial interests in the Global Note
will be entitled to have certificates registered in their names
and to receive physical delivery of Notes only in the limited
circumstances described below under the caption
Depository Procedures Exchange of
Global Notes for Definitive Notes.
Depository Procedures
The following description of the operations and procedures of
DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream Banking is provided solely as a
matter of convenience. These operations and procedures are
solely within the control of the respective settlement systems
and are subject to changes by them from time to time. The
Company takes no responsibility for these operations and
procedures and urges investors to contact the systems or their
participants directly to discuss these matters.
Upon deposit of the Global Note, DTC will credit the accounts of
Participants designated by the underwriters with portions of the
principal amount of the Global Note.
Payment of principal of and premium and interest on the Global
Note will be made to Cede & Co., the nominee for DTC,
as registered owner of the Global Note, by wire transfer of
immediately available funds on the applicable payment date.
Neither the Company nor the Trustee, nor any agent of either of
them, will have any responsibility or liability for any aspect
of the records relating to or payments made on account of
beneficial ownership interests in the Global Note or for
maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to
such beneficial ownership interest.
The Company has been informed by DTC that, with respect to any
payment of principal of, or premium or interest on, the Global
Note, DTCs practice is to credit accounts of Participants
on the applicable payment date, with payments in amounts
proportionate to their respective beneficial interests in the
Notes represented by the Global Note as shown on the records of
DTC, unless DTC has reason to believe that it will not receive
payment on such payment date. Payments by Participants to owners
of beneficial interests in the Notes represented by the Global
Note held through such Participants will be the responsibility
of such Participants, as is now the case with securities held
for the accounts of customers registered in street
name. In particular, payments to owners of beneficial
interests in the Notes held through Euroclear and Clearstream
Banking will be made in accordance with the rules and operating
procedures of Euroclear and Clearstream Banking.
Transfers between Participants will be effected in the ordinary
way in accordance with DTCs rules and will be settled in
immediately available funds. Participants in Euroclear and
Clearstream Banking will effect transfers with other
participants in the ordinary way in accordance with the rules
and operating procedures of Euroclear and Clearstream Banking,
as applicable. The laws of some states require that certain
persons take physical delivery in definitive form of securities
that they own. Consequently, the ability to transfer beneficial
interests in
172
the Global Note to such persons will be limited to that extent.
Because DTC can act only on behalf of Participants, which in
turn act on behalf of Indirect Participants and certain banks,
the ability of a person having beneficial interests in the
Global Note to pledge such interests to persons or entities that
do not participate in the DTC system, or otherwise take actions
in respect of such interests, may be affected by the lack of a
physical certificate evidencing such interests.
Cross-market transfers between DTC Participants, on the one
hand, and directly or indirectly through Euroclear or
Clearstream Banking participants, on the other, will be effected
in DTC in accordance with DTC rules on behalf of Euroclear or
Clearstream Banking, as the case may be, by its respective
depositary; however, these cross-market transactions will
require delivery of instructions to Euroclear or Clearstream
Banking, as the case may be, by the counterparty in the system
in accordance with its rules and procedures and within its
established deadlines (Brussels time). Euroclear or Clearstream
Banking, as the case may be, will, if the transaction meets its
settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its depositary
to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by
delivering or receiving interests in the relevant Global Note in
DTC, and making or receiving payment in accordance with normal
procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC.
Euroclear participants and Clearstream Banking participants may
not deliver instructions directly to the depositaries for
Euroclear or Clearstream Banking.
Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a
Euroclear or Clearstream Banking participant purchasing an
interest in the Global Note from a DTC Participant will be
credited during the securities settlement processing day (which
must be a business day for Euroclear or Clearstream Banking, as
the case may be) immediately following the DTC settlement date,
and the credit of any transactions interests in the Global
Note settled during the processing day will be reported to the
relevant Euroclear or Clearstream Banking participant on that
day. Cash received in Euroclear or Clearstream Banking as a
result of sales of interests in the Global Note by or through a
Euroclear or Clearstream Banking participant to a DTC
Participant will be received with value on the DTC settlement
date, but will be available in the relevant Euroclear or
Clearstream Banking cash account only as of the business day
following settlement in DTC.
Neither the Company nor the Trustee, nor any agent of either of
them, will have responsibility for the performance of DTC,
Euroclear, Clearstream Banking or their respective participants
of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures
governing their operations. DTC has advised the Company that it
will take any action permitted to be taken by a holder of the
Notes (including, without limitation, the presentation of the
Notes for exchange as described below) only at the direction of
one or more Participants to whose accounts with DTC interests in
the Global Note are credited, and only in respect of the Notes
represented by the Global Note as to which such Participant or
Participants has or have given such direction. However, if there
is an Event of Default under the Notes, DTC reserves the right
to exchange the Global Note for Notes in definitive form, which
it will distribute to its Participants.
DTC has also advised the Company that DTC is a limited purpose
trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York,
a member of the Federal Reserve System, a clearing
corporation within the meaning of the Uniform Commercial
Code and a clearing agency registered pursuant to
the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC was
created to hold securities for its Participants and to
facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities
transactions between Participants through electronic book-entry
changes to accounts of its Participants, thereby eliminating the
need for physical movement of certificates. Participants include
securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and
clearing corporations and may include certain other
organizations such as the underwriters. Certain of such
Participants (or their representatives), together with other
entities, own DTC. Indirect access to the DTC system is
available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust
companies that clear through, or maintain a custodial
relationship with, a Participant, either directly or indirectly.
|
|
|
Exchange of Global Notes for Definitive Notes |
The Global Note is exchangeable for Notes in registered
definitive form (Definitive Notes) if:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
DTC notifies the Company that it is unwilling or unable to
continue as depositary for the Global Notes or has ceased to be
a clearing agency registered under the Exchange Act and, in
either case, the |
173
|
|
|
|
|
Company thereupon fails to appoint a successor depositary within
90 days after the date of such notice; or |
|
|
(b) |
the Company, at its option, notifies the Trustee in writing that
it elects to cause the issuance of Definitive Notes. |
In all cases, Definitive Notes delivered in exchange for any
Global Note or beneficial interests therein will be registered
in the names, and issued in any approved denominations,
requested by or on behalf of DTC (in accordance with its
customary procedures).
|
|
|
Exchange of Definitive Notes for Global Notes |
If issued, Definitive Notes may not be exchanged or transferred
for beneficial interests in the Global Note.
|
|
|
Exchange of Definitive Notes for Definitive Notes |
If issued, Definitive Notes may be exchanged or transferred by
presenting or surrendering such Definitive Notes at the office
of the Registrar located in Dallas, Texas or Luxembourg with a
written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to such
Registrar, duly executed by the holder of the Definitive Notes
or by its attorney, duly authorized in writing.
|
|
|
Same-Day Settlement and Payment |
The Notes represented by the Global Note will be eligible to
trade in DTCs Same Day Funds Settlement System, and any
permitted secondary market trading activity in such Note will,
therefore, be required by DTC to be settled in immediately
available funds. The Company expects that secondary trading in
any Definitive Notes would also be settled in immediately
available funds.
Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a
Euroclear or Clearstream Banking participant purchasing an
interest in the Global Note from a Participant in DTC will be
credited, and any such crediting will be reported to the
relevant Euroclear or Clearstream Banking participant, during
the securities settlement processing day (which must be a
business day for Euroclear and Clearstream Banking) immediately
following the settlement date of DTC.
DTC has advised the Company that cash received in Euroclear or
Clearstream Banking as a result of sales of interests in the
Global Note by or through a Euroclear or Clearstream Banking
participant to a Participant in DTC will be received with value
on the settlement date of DTC but will be available in the
relevant Euroclear or Clearstream Banking cash account only as
of the business day for Euroclear or Clearstream Banking
following DTCs settlement date.
Replacement, Transfer and Exchange
If any Note at any time is mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost,
such Note may be replaced at the cost of the applicant at the
office of the Trustee or the office of the Registrar in
Luxembourg. The applicant for a new Note must, in the case of
any mutilated Note, surrender such Note to the Trustee or the
Registrar in Luxembourg, as applicable, and, in the case of any
lost, destroyed or stolen Note, furnish evidence satisfactory to
the Trustee or the Registrar in Luxembourg, as applicable, of
such loss, destruction or theft, together with such indemnity as
the Trustee or the Registrar in Luxembourg, as applicable, and
the Company may require.
Initially, the Trustee will act as Registrar in the continental
United States, and Notes may be presented for registration of
transfer and exchange at the office of the Trustee in Dallas,
Texas. Dexia Banque Internationale à Luxembourg,
société anonyme will act initially as Registrar in
Luxembourg, and Notes may be presented for registration of
transfer and exchange at its office at 69, route dEsch,
2953 Luxembourg.
A holder may transfer or exchange Notes in accordance with the
Indenture. The Registrar and the Trustee may require a holder,
among other things, to furnish appropriate endorsements and
transfer documents and the Company may require a holder to pay
any transfer tax or similar governmental charge required by law.
The Company and the Registrar are not required to transfer or
exchange any Note selected for redemption. Also, the
174
Company and the Registrar are not required to transfer or
exchange any Note for a period of 15 days before a
selection of Notes to be redeemed.
Purchase
The Company, the Trustee and their respective Affiliates may at
any time and from time to time purchase any Note or a beneficial
interest in any Note in the open market or otherwise at any
price.
Notices
Any notice to Noteholders will be mailed by first class mail or
delivered by overnight air courier guaranteeing next day
delivery, in each case to their respective registered addresses
shown on the register kept by the Registrar. In addition, for so
long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange
and its rules so require, any such notice (including notices of
redemption) will be published in a newspaper having general
circulation in Luxembourg, which is expected to be
DWort, or if such newspaper ceases to be published
or timely publication in it will not be practicable, in such
other newspaper as the Trustee deems necessary to give fair and
reasonable notice to the Noteholders. Notices may also be
published on the internet site of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange
at www.bourse.lu. Also for so long as the Notes are listed on
the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, the Company will provide to the
exchange a copy of all notices to Noteholders.
Listing
Application has been made to list the Notes on the Euro MTF
market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
Certain Definitions
Set forth below are certain defined terms used in the Indenture.
Reference is made to the Indenture for a full disclosure of all
such terms, as well as any other capitalized terms used herein
for which no definition is provided.
Acquired Indebtedness means with respect to a
specified Person (a) Indebtedness of any other Person
existing at the time such other Person is merged with or into or
becomes a Subsidiary of such specified Person or
(b) Indebtedness relating to properties or assets acquired
by such specified Person. Acquired Indebtedness shall be deemed
to be incurred on the date the acquired Person becomes a
Restricted Subsidiary or the date of the related acquisition of
properties or assets from such Person.
Affiliate of any specified Person means any
other Person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by
or under direct or indirect common control with such specified
Person. For purposes of the Indenture, control, as
used with respect to any Person, means the possession, directly
or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of
the management or policies of such Person, whether through the
ownership of Voting Stock, by agreement or otherwise; provided,
however, that beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the Voting
Stock of a Person shall be deemed to be control. For purposes of
the Indenture, the terms controlling,
controlled by and under common control
with have correlative meanings.
Applicable Premium means, with respect to any
Note on any redemption date, the greater of:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
1.0% of the principal amount of the Note; and |
|
|
(b) |
the excess of (1) the present value at such redemption date
of (A) the redemption price of the Note at May 15, 2010
(such redemption price being set forth in the table appearing
above under the caption Optional
Redemption) plus (B) all required interest payments
due on the Note during the period from such redemption date
through May 15, 2010 (excluding accrued but unpaid
interest), computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury
Rate as of such redemption date plus 50 basis points over
(2) the principal amount of the Note, if greater. |
175
Asset Sale means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the sale, lease, conveyance or other disposition (a
disposition) of any properties or assets
(including, without limitation, by way of a sale-and-leaseback),
excluding dispositions in the ordinary course of business
(provided that the disposition of all or substantially all of
the properties or assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries
taken as a whole will be subject to the provisions of the
Indenture described above under the caption
Put Option of Holders Change of
Control and the provisions described above in
clause (f) under the caption Events of
Default and Remedies and not to the provisions of the
Asset Sales covenant); |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
the issue or sale by the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries of Equity Interests of any of the Companys
Subsidiaries; and |
whether, in the case of clause (a), (b) or (c), in a
single transaction or a series of related transactions, provided
that such transaction or series of related transactions
(1) involves properties or assets having a fair market
value in excess of
2,500,000 or
(2) results in the payment of net proceeds (including
insurance proceeds from an Event of Loss) in excess of
2,500,000.
Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this definition, the
following transactions will be deemed not to be Asset Sales:
|
|
|
|
(A) |
a disposition of obsolete or excess equipment or other
properties or assets; |
|
|
(B) |
a disposition of properties or assets (including Equity
Interests) by the Company to a Wholly Owned Restricted
Subsidiary or by a Restricted Subsidiary to the Company or to a
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary; |
|
|
(C) |
a disposition of cash or Cash Equivalents; |
|
|
(D) |
a disposition of properties or assets (including Equity
Interests) that constitutes a Restricted Payment that is
permitted by the provisions of the Indenture described above
under the caption Certain
Covenants Restricted Payments; |
|
|
(E) |
any trade or exchange by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary of equipment or other properties or assets for
equipment or other properties or assets owned or held by another
Person, provided that the fair market value of the
properties or assets traded or exchanged by the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary (together with any cash or Cash
Equivalents) is reasonably equivalent to the fair market value
of the properties or assets (together with any cash or Cash
Equivalents) to be received by the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary; |
|
|
(F) |
the creation or perfection of a Lien on any properties or assets
(or any income or profits therefrom) of the Company or any of
its Restricted Subsidiaries that is not prohibited by the
covenant described under the caption Certain
Covenants Liens; |
|
|
(G) |
a sale-and-leaseback of the Companys office facilities in
Massy, France replacing the sale-and-leaseback transaction
relating to such facilities that is outstanding on the Issue
Date; |
|
|
(H) |
the surrender or waiver of contract rights or the settlement,
release or surrender of contractual, non-contractual or other
claims of any kind; |
|
|
(I) |
the sale or discount, in each case without recourse, of accounts
receivable arising in the ordinary course of business, but only
in connection with the compromise of collection thereof; |
|
|
(J) |
the factoring of accounts receivable arising in the ordinary
course of business pursuant to arrangements customary in the
region; and |
|
|
(K) |
the grant in the ordinary course of business of any
non-exclusive license of patents, trademarks, registrations
therefor and other similar intellectual property. |
Attributable Indebtedness in respect of a
sale-and-leaseback transaction means, at the time of
determination, the present value (discounted at the rate of
interest implicit in such transaction, determined in accordance
176
with GAAP) of the obligation of the lessee for net rental
payments during the remaining term of the lease included in such
sale-and-leaseback transaction (including any period for which
such lease has been extended or may, at the option of the
lessor, be extended). As used in the preceding sentence, the
net rental payments under any lease for any such
period shall mean the sum of rental and other payments required
to be paid with respect to such period by the lessee thereunder,
excluding any amounts required to be paid by such lessee on
account of maintenance and repairs, insurance, taxes,
assessments, water rates or similar charges. In the case of any
lease that is terminable by the lessee upon payment of penalty,
such net rental payment shall also include the amount of such
penalty, but no rent shall be considered as required to be paid
under such lease subsequent to the first date upon which it may
be so terminated.
Board of Directors means the Board of
Directors (Conseil dAdministration) of the Company, or any
authorized committee of the Board of Directors.
Capital Lease Obligation means, at the time
any determination thereof is to be made, the amount of the
liability in respect of a capital lease that would at such time
be required to be capitalized on a balance sheet in accordance
with GAAP.
Capital Stock means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
in the case of a corporation, corporate stock; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
in the case of an association or business entity, any and all
shares, interests, participations, rights or other equivalents
(however designated) of corporate stock, including preferred
stock; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
in the case of a partnership or limited liability company,
partnership or membership interests (whether general or
limited); and |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
any other interest or participation that confers on a Person the
right to receive a share of the profits and losses of, or
distributions of assets of, the issuing Person. |
Cash Equivalents means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
securities issued or directly and fully guaranteed or insured by
the government of the United States of America, the Republic of
France or any other country whose sovereign debt has a rating of
at least A3 from Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and
at least A- from Standard & Poors Ratings
Services or any agency or instrumentality of any such government
(provided that the full faith and credit of such
government is pledged in support thereof), in each case having
maturities of not more than 12 months from the date of
acquisition; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
certificates of deposit, Eurodollar time deposits and French
negotiable debt instruments (titres de créances
négociables) with maturities of 12 months or less
from the date of acquisition, bankers acceptances with
maturities not exceeding six months and overnight bank deposits,
in each case with or issued by any commercial bank organized
under the laws of any country that is a member of the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development having
capital and surplus in excess of
500,000,000 and
whose long-term debt securities are rated at least A3 by
Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and at least A- by
Standard & Poors Ratings Services; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
repurchase obligations with a term of not more than seven days
for underlying securities of the types described in
clauses (a) and (b) above entered into with any
financial institution meeting the qualifications specified in
clause (b) above; |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
commercial paper and French negotiable debt instruments
(titres de créances négociables) having a
rating of at least P-1 from Moodys Investors Service, Inc.
or at least A-1 from Standard & Poors Ratings
Services and in each case maturing within 12 months after
the date of acquisition; |
|
|
|
|
(e) |
deposits available for withdrawal on demand with any commercial
bank not meeting the qualifications specified in clause (b)
above, provided that all such deposits are made in the
ordinary course of business, do not remain on deposit for more
than 30 consecutive days and do not exceed
25,000,000 |
177
|
|
|
|
|
in the aggregate at any one time, with no more than
5,000,000 being
deposited in commercial banks within a single country; and |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
money market mutual funds substantially all of the assets of
which are of the type described in any of the foregoing
clauses (a) to (d). |
Closing Date means the date of original
issuance of the Additional Notes.
Common Stock means the common or ordinary
shares of the Company.
Consolidated Cash Flow means, with respect to
any Person for any period, the Consolidated Net Income of such
Person for such period plus, to the extent deducted or excluded
in calculating Consolidated Net Income for such period:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
provision for taxes based on income or profits of such Person
and its Restricted Subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Consolidated Interest Expense of such Person and its Restricted
Subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
depreciation and amortization (including amortization or
impairment, if any, of goodwill and of other intangibles but
excluding amortization of prepaid cash expenses that were paid
in a prior period) of such Person and its Restricted
Subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
other non-cash expenses (excluding any such non-cash expense to
the extent that it represents an accrual of or reserve for cash
expenses in any future period or amortization of a prepaid cash
expense that was paid in a prior period) of such Person and its
Restricted Subsidiaries less any non-cash items increasing
Consolidated Net Income of such Person and its Restricted
Subsidiaries (other than items that will result in cash receipt); |
|
|
|
|
(e) |
any expenses, fees, charges or other costs related to any equity
offering (other than of Disqualified Stock) permitted by the
indenture (whether or not successful); and |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
without duplication, an amount equal to any extraordinary loss
plus any net loss realized by such Person or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries in connection with an Asset Sale, |
in each case, on a consolidated basis and determined in
accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio means,
with respect to any Person for any period, the ratio of the
Consolidated Cash Flow of such Person for such period to the
Consolidated Interest Expense of such Person for such period;
provided, however, that the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio
shall be calculated giving pro forma effect to each of the
following transactions as if each such transaction had occurred
at the beginning of the applicable reference period:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
any incurrence, assumption, guarantee, repayment, purchase or
redemption by such Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries
of any Indebtedness (other than revolving credit borrowings)
subsequent to the commencement of the period for which the
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is being calculated but
prior to the date on which the event for which the calculation
of the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is made (the
Calculation Date); |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
any acquisition that has been made by such Person or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries, or approved and expected to be
consummated within 30 days of the Calculation Date,
including, in each case, through a merger or consolidation, and
including any related financing transactions, during the
reference period or subsequent to such reference period and on
or prior to the Calculation Date; and |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
any other transaction that may be given pro forma effect in
accordance with Article 11 of
Regulation S-X
under the Securities Act as in effect from time to time; |
provided further, however, that (1) the Consolidated
Cash Flow attributable to discontinued operations, as determined
in accordance with GAAP, and operations or businesses disposed
of prior to the Calculation Date, shall be excluded and
(2) the Consolidated Interest Expense attributable to
discontinued operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP,
and operations or businesses disposed of prior to the
Calculation Date, shall be
178
excluded, but only to the extent that the obligations giving
rise to such Consolidated Interest Expense will not be
obligations of the referent Person or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries following the Calculation Date.
Consolidated Interest Expense means, with
respect to any Person for any period, the sum, without
duplication, of the following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the consolidated interest expense of such Person and its
Restricted Subsidiaries for such period, whether paid or accrued
(including, without limitation, amortization of original issue
discount, non-cash interest payments, the interest component of
any deferred payment obligations, the interest component of all
payments associated with Capital Lease Obligations, commissions,
discounts and other fees and charges incurred in respect of
letter of credit or bankers acceptance financings, and net
of all payments made or received (if any) pursuant to Hedging
Obligations in respect of interest rates but excluding
amortization of debt issuance costs and non-cash charges other
than non-cash interest expenses related to convertible
bonds); and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
the consolidated interest expense of such Person and its
Restricted Subsidiaries that was capitalized during such period. |
Consolidated Net Income means, with respect
to any Person for any period, the aggregate of the Net Income of
such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period, on
a consolidated basis, determined in accordance with GAAP,
provided that:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the Net Income (but not loss) of any Person that is not a
Restricted Subsidiary or that is accounted for by the equity
method of accounting shall be included only to the extent of the
amount of dividends or distributions paid in cash to the
referent Person or a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary thereof; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
the Net Income of any Restricted Subsidiary shall be excluded to
the extent that the declaration or payment of dividends or
similar distributions by that Restricted Subsidiary of that Net
Income is not at the date of determination permitted without any
prior governmental approval (that has not been obtained) or,
directly or indirectly, by operation of the terms of its charter
or any agreement, instrument, judgment, decree, order, statute,
rule or governmental regulation applicable to that Subsidiary or
its stockholders; and |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles shall
be excluded. |
Consolidated Net Worth means, with respect to
any Person as of any date, the consolidated stockholders
equity of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries as of such
date less the amount of consolidated stockholders equity
attributable to Disqualified Stock or treasury stock of such
Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries as of such date, in each
case determined in accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Tangible Net Worth means, at any
date, the Consolidated Net Worth of the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries as shown on their most recent
consolidated balance sheet less, without duplication, all
goodwill, trade names, trademarks, patents, unamortized debt
discount and expense and other like intangibles, as determined
in accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Total Assets means, with respect
to any Person as of any date, the consolidated total assets of
such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries as of such date, as
determined in accordance with GAAP.
Credit Facilities means, with respect to any
Person, one or more debt facilities or commercial paper
facilities with banks or other institutional lenders (including
with special purpose vehicles established by such banks or
lenders to provide such facilities) providing for revolving
credit loans, term loans, receivables financing (including
through the sale of receivables to such lenders or to special
purpose entities formed to borrow from such lenders against such
receivables) or trade letters of credit, in each case, as
amended, restated, modified, renewed, refunded, replaced or
refinanced in whole or in part from time to time.
Default means any event that is, or with the
passage of time or the giving of notice or both would be, an
Event of Default.
179
Disqualified Stock means any Capital Stock
that, by its terms (or by the terms of any security into which
it is convertible or for which it is exchangeable), or upon the
happening of any event, matures (excluding any maturity as a
result of an optional redemption by the issuer thereof) or is
mandatorily redeemable, pursuant to a sinking fund obligation or
otherwise, or redeemable at the option of the holder thereof, in
whole or in part, on or prior to the date that is 91 days
after the date on which the Notes mature or are redeemed or
retired in full; provided, however, that any Capital
Stock that would constitute Disqualified Stock solely because
the holders thereof (or of any security into which it is
convertible or for which it is exchangeable) have the right to
require the issuer to purchase such Capital Stock (or such
security into which it is convertible or for which it is
exchangeable) upon the occurrence of any of the events
constituting an Asset Sale or a Change of Control shall not
constitute Disqualified Stock if such Capital Stock (and all
such securities into which it is convertible or for which it is
exchangeable) provides that the issuer thereof may not purchase
or redeem any such Capital Stock (or any such security into
which it is convertible or for which it is exchangeable)
pursuant to such provisions prior to compliance by the Company
with the provisions of the Indenture described under the caption
Put Option of Holders Change of
Control or Put Option of
Holders Asset Sales, as the case may be.
Equity Interests means Capital Stock and all
warrants, options or other rights to acquire Capital Stock (but
excluding any debt security that is convertible into, or
exchangeable for, Capital Stock).
euro or
means the single currency of participating member states
of the European Economic and Monetary Union as contemplated by
the Treaty Establishing the European Union.
Euro Equivalent means, with respect to any
monetary amount in a currency other than euros, at or as of any
time for the determination thereof, the amount of euros obtained
by converting such foreign currency involved in such computation
into euros at the spot rate for the purchase of euros with the
applicable foreign currency as quoted by Reuters (or, if Reuters
ceases to provide such spot quotations, by any other reputable
service as is providing such spot quotations, as selected by the
Company) at approximately 11:00 a.m. (New York City time)
on the date not more than two business days prior to such
determination.
Event of Loss means, with respect to any
property or asset of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary,
(a) any damage to such property or asset that results in an
insurance settlement with respect thereto on the basis of a
total loss or a constructive or compromised total loss or
(b) the confiscation, condemnation or requisition of title
to such property or asset by any government or instrumentality
or agency thereof.
Exchange Act means the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Existing Indebtedness means Indebtedness of
the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than
Indebtedness under the Credit Facilities) in existence on the
date of the Indenture, until such amounts are repaid, but shall
not include any Indebtedness that is repaid with the proceeds of
the Additional Notes.
The term fair market value means, with
respect to any asset or Investment, the fair market value of
such asset or Investment at the time of the event requiring such
determination, as determined in good faith by the Company, or,
with respect to any asset or Investment in excess of
15,000,000
(other than cash or Cash Equivalents), as determined by a
reputable investment banking, accounting or appraisal firm that
is, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, qualified to
perform the task for which such firm has been engaged and
independent with respect to the Company.
Foreign Restricted Subsidiary means each of
CGG Asia Pacific and CGG Pan India Ltd.
GAAP means International Financial Reporting
Standards, accounting principles adopted by the International
Accounting Standards Board and its predecessor, as in effect
from time to time.
guarantee means a guarantee other than by
endorsement of negotiable instruments for collection in the
ordinary course of business, direct or indirect, in any manner
including, without limitation, by way of pledge of assets or
through letters of credit or reimbursement agreements in respect
thereof, of all or any part of any Indebtedness.
180
Guarantor means each of:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Sercel Inc., Sercel Canada Ltd., Sercel Australia Pty Ltd, CGG
Americas, Inc., CGG Canada Services Ltd., CGG Marine
Resources Norge A/ S, CGGVeritas Services Inc., Veritas DGC Land
Inc., Veritas Geophysical Corporation, Veritas Investments
Inc., Viking Maritime Inc., Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC,
Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd. and Alitheia Resources
Inc.; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
any other Subsidiary of the Company that executes a supplemental
indenture providing for a Subsidiary Guarantee in accordance
with the provisions of Indenture, |
and their respective successors and assigns, in each case, until
the Subsidiary Guarantee of such Person has been released in
accordance with the provisions of the Indenture.
Hedging Obligations means, with respect to
any Person, the obligations of such Person under:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
interest rate swap agreements, interest rate cap agreements and
interest rate collar agreements; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
other agreements or arrangements designed to protect such Person
against fluctuations in interest rates; and |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
any foreign currency futures contract, option or similar
agreement or arrangement designed to protect such Person against
fluctuations in currency exchange rates or commodity prices, |
in each case to the extent such obligations are incurred in the
ordinary course of business of such Person and not for
speculative purposes.
Indebtedness means, with respect to any
Person, any indebtedness of such Person, without duplication,
whether or not contingent, in respect of borrowed money
including, without limitation, any guarantee thereof, or
evidenced by bonds, notes, debentures or similar instruments or
letters of credit (or reimbursement agreements in respect
thereof) or bankers acceptances or representing Capital
Lease Obligations or the balance deferred and unpaid of the
purchase price of any property, except any such balance that
constitutes an accrued expense or trade account payable, or
representing any Hedging Obligations, if and to the extent any
of the preceding indebtedness (other than letters of credit,
guarantees and Hedging Obligations) would appear as a liability
upon a balance sheet of such Person prepared in accordance with
GAAP. The amount of any Indebtedness outstanding as of any date
shall be (a) the accreted value thereof, in the case of any
Indebtedness that does not require current payments of interest,
and (b) the principal amount thereof, in the case of any
other Indebtedness (with letters of credit being deemed to have
a principal amount equal to the maximum potential liability of
the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries thereunder).
Investment Grade Status shall occur when the
Notes receive a rating of BBB- or higher from
S&P (or its equivalent under any successor rating categories
of S&P) and a rating of Baa3 or higher from
Moodys (or its equivalent under any successor rating
categories of Moodys) or, if either such entity ceases to
rate the Notes for reasons outside the normal control of the
Company, the equivalent investment grade credit rating from any
other nationally recognized statistical rating
organization, as that term is used in
Rule 15c3-1 under
the Exchange Act, selected by the Company as a replacement
agency.
Investments means, with respect to any
Person, all investments by such Person in other Persons
(including Affiliates) in the forms of direct or indirect loans
(including guarantees by the referent Person of, and Liens on
any assets of the referent Person securing, Indebtedness or
other obligations of other Persons), advances or capital
contributions (excluding commission, travel and similar advances
to directors, officers and employees made in the ordinary course
of business), purchases or other acquisitions for consideration
of Indebtedness, Equity Interests or other securities, together
with all items that are or would be classified as investments on
a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP; provided,
however, that the following shall not constitute
Investments: (1) extensions of trade credit or other
advances to customers on commercially reasonable terms in
accordance with normal trade practices or otherwise in the
ordinary course of business, (2) Hedging Obligations and
(3) endorsements of negotiable instruments and documents in
the ordinary course of business. If the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary of the Company sells or otherwise disposes
of any Equity Interests of any direct or indirect Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company such that, after giving effect to any
such sale or disposition, such
181
Person is no longer a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, the
Company shall be deemed to have made an Investment on the date
of any such sale or disposition equal to the fair market value
of the Equity Interests of such Restricted Subsidiary not sold
or disposed of in an amount determined as provided in the final
paragraph of the covenant described above under the caption
Certain Covenants Restricted
Payments.
Issue Date means April 28, 2005, the
first date on which Notes were issued under the Indenture. The
Indenture is dated as of the Issue Date.
Lien means, with respect to any asset, any
mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security interest or encumbrance
of any kind in respect of such asset, whether or not filed,
recorded or otherwise perfected under applicable law (including
any conditional sale or other title retention agreement, any
lease in the nature thereof, any option or other agreement to
sell or give a security interest in and any filing of or
agreement to give any financing statement under the Uniform
Commercial Code (or equivalent statutes) of any jurisdiction
other than a precautionary financing statement respecting a
lease not intended as a security agreement) or any assignment
(or agreement to assign) any right to income or profits from any
assets by way of security.
Merger includes a fusion, an amalgamation, a
compulsory share exchange, a conversion of a corporation into
another business entity and any other transaction having effects
substantially similar to a merger under the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware.
Net Income means, with respect to any Person,
the net income (or loss) of such Person, determined in
accordance with GAAP and before any reduction in respect of
preferred stock dividends, excluding, however:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
any gain (but not loss), together with any related provision for
taxes on such gain (but not loss), realized in connection with
(1) any Asset Sale (including, without limitation,
dispositions pursuant to sale-and-leaseback transactions) or
(2) the disposition of any securities by such Person or any
of its Restricted Subsidiaries or the extinguishment of any
Indebtedness of such Person or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
any extraordinary or non-recurring gain (but not loss), together
with any related provision for taxes on such extraordinary or
non-recurring gain (but not loss). |
Net Proceeds means the aggregate cash
proceeds received by the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries in respect of any Asset Sale (including, without
limitation, any cash received upon the sale or other disposition
of any non-cash consideration received in any Asset Sale), net
of (without duplication) the following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the direct costs relating to such Asset Sale (including, without
limitation, legal, accounting and investment banking fees, sales
commissions, recording fees, title transfer fees, title
insurance premiums, appraiser fees, other
out-of-pocket expenses
and costs incurred in connection with preparing such asset for
sale) and any relocation expenses incurred as a result thereof; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
taxes paid or estimated to be payable as a result thereof (after
taking into account any available tax credits or deductions and
any tax sharing arrangements that will result in a reduction in
consolidated tax liability); |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
amounts required to be applied to the repayment of Indebtedness
(other than under a revolving credit facility) secured by a Lien
on the asset or assets that were the subject of such Asset
Sale; and |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
any reserve (including any reserve against any liabilities
associated with such Asset Sale and retained by the Company or
the relevant Restricted Subsidiary) established in accordance
with GAAP or any amount placed in escrow, in either case for
adjustment in respect of the sale price of such asset or assets,
until such time as such reserve is reversed or such escrow
arrangement is terminated, in which case Net Proceeds shall
include only the amount of the reserve so reversed or the amount
returned to the Company or its Restricted Subsidiaries from such
escrow arrangement, as the case may be. |
182
Non-Recourse Debt means Indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
as to which neither the Company nor any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries (1) provides credit support of any kind
(including any undertaking, agreement or instrument that would
constitute Indebtedness) or is otherwise directly or indirectly
liable (as a guarantor or otherwise) or (2) constitutes the
lender; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
no default with respect to which (including any rights the
holders thereof may have to take enforcement action against an
Unrestricted Subsidiary) would permit (upon notice, lapse of
time or both) the holders of Indebtedness of the Company or any
of its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than the Notes) to declare
a default on such Indebtedness or cause the payment thereof to
be accelerated or payable prior to its stated maturity; and |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
as to which the lenders have been notified in writing that they
will not have any recourse to the stock or assets of the Company
or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries. |
Offering means the offering of the Additional
Notes by the Company pursuant to this prospectus.
Pari Passu Indebtedness means, with respect
to any Net Proceeds from Asset Sales, Indebtedness of the
Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries the terms of which
require the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary to apply such
Net Proceeds to offer to purchase such Indebtedness.
Permitted Guarantees means any guarantee:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
guaranteeing or securing the Notes or any Guarantee; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
in favor of the Company or a Guarantor; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
guaranteeing Indebtedness incurred pursuant to clause (a)
of the second paragraph of the covenant described under the
caption Certain Covenants
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred
Stock; or |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
in existence on the date of the Indenture to the extent
guaranteeing Existing Indebtedness and Permitted Refinancing
Indebtedness in respect thereof incurred in compliance with
clause (j) of the second paragraph of the covenant
described under the caption Certain
Covenants Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock. |
Permitted Investments means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
any Investment in the Company (including, without limitation,
any acquisition of the Notes) or in a Wholly Owned Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company, other than any Investment described
in clause (a) of the definition of Restricted
Payments; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
any Investment in Cash Equivalents; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
any Investment by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of
the Company in a Person if as a result of such Investment
(1) such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company or (2) such Person is merged or consolidated with
or into, or transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its
properties or assets to, or is liquidated into, the Company or a
Restricted Subsidiary of the Company; |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
any Investment made as a result of the receipt of non-cash
consideration from (1) an Asset Sale that was made pursuant
to and in compliance with the covenant described above under the
caption Put Option of Holders
Asset Sales or (2) a disposition of assets that does
not constitute an Asset Sale; |
|
|
|
|
(e) |
Investments in stock, obligations or securities received in
settlement of any claim or debts owing to the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary as a result of bankruptcy or insolvency
proceedings or received in satisfaction of any judgment or in
settlement of any claim in circumstances where the Company does
not expect it would receive cash payment in a timely manner, or
upon the foreclosure, perfection or enforcement of any Lien in
favor of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, in each case
as to any claim or debts owing to the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary that arose in the ordinary course of business of the
Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary, provided that
any stocks, obligations or securities received in settlement of
any claim or debts that arose in the ordinary course |
183
|
|
|
|
|
of business (and received other than as a result of bankruptcy
or insolvency proceedings or received in satisfaction of any
judgment or in settlement of any claim in circumstances where
the Company does not expect it would receive cash payment in a
timely manner, or upon foreclosure, perfection or enforcement of
any Lien) that are, within 180 days of receipt, converted
into cash or Cash Equivalents shall be treated as having been
cash or Cash Equivalents at the time received; |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
Investments in Argas Ltd. consisting of guarantees of its
obligations incurred in the ordinary course of its business,
provided that such Investments, when taken together with
all other Investments made pursuant to this clause (f) that
are at the time outstanding, do not exceed
50,000,000; |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
Investments in Argas Ltd. (other than those described in
clause (f) above) and any other Affiliate organized in a
foreign jurisdiction that is required by the applicable laws and
regulations of such foreign jurisdiction or its governmental
agencies, authorities or state-owned businesses to be majority
owned by the government of such foreign jurisdiction or
individual or corporate citizens of such foreign jurisdiction or
another foreign jurisdiction in order for such Affiliate to
transact business in such foreign jurisdiction, provided that
such Investments, when taken together with all other
Investments made pursuant to this clause (g) that are at
the time outstanding, do not exceed 20% of Consolidated Tangible
Net Worth; |
|
|
(h) |
Investments in any Person in exchange for, or out of the net
cash proceeds of, an issue or sale by the Company of Equity
Interests (other than Disqualified Stock); and |
|
|
|
|
(i) |
other Investments in any Person having an aggregate fair market
value (measured on the date each such Investment was made and
without giving effect to subsequent changes in value), when
taken together with all other Investments made pursuant to this
clause (i) that are at the time outstanding, do not exceed
25,000,000. |
Permitted Liens means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Liens securing Indebtedness incurred pursuant to clause (a)
of the second paragraph of the covenant described under the
caption Certain Covenants
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified
Stock, and Liens securing any other Indebtedness under
Credit Facilities incurred pursuant to the first paragraph of
such covenant; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Liens in favor of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Liens on any property or asset of a Person existing at the time
such Person is merged into or consolidated with the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, provided that
such Liens were in existence prior to such merger or
consolidation, were not created in contemplation of it and do
not extend to any property or asset of the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries other than those of the Person merged
into or consolidated with the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(d) |
Liens on any property or asset existing at the time of
acquisition thereof by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary
of the Company, provided that such Liens were in
existence prior to such acquisition, were not created in
contemplation of it and do not extend to any other property or
asset of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(e) |
Liens securing the performance of statutory obligations, surety
or appeal bonds, bid or performance bonds, insurance obligations
or other obligations of a like nature incurred in the ordinary
course of business; |
|
|
|
(f) Liens securing Hedging Obligations; |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
Liens existing on the date of the Indenture; |
|
|
(h) |
Liens securing Indebtedness (including Capital Lease
Obligations) permitted by clause (g) of the second
paragraph of the covenant described under the caption
Certain Covenants Incurrence of |
184
|
|
|
|
|
Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified Stock,
provided that such Liens extend only to the property,
plant or equipment financed by such Indebtedness; |
|
|
(i) |
any interest or title of a lessor under an operating lease; |
|
|
(j) |
Liens arising by reason of deposits necessary to obtain standby
letters of credit in the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
(k) |
Liens on real or personal property or assets of the Company or a
Restricted Subsidiary thereof to secure Indebtedness incurred
for the purpose of (1) financing all or any part of the
purchase price of such property or assets incurred prior to, at
the time of, or within 90 days after, the acquisition of
such property or assets or (2) financing all or any part of
the cost of construction or improvement of any such property or
assets, provided that the amount of any such financing
shall not exceed the amount expended in the acquisition of, or
the construction of, such property or assets and such Liens
shall not extend to any other property or assets of the Company
or a Restricted Subsidiary (other than any associated accounts,
contracts and insurance proceeds); |
|
|
(l) |
judgment Liens not giving rise to an Event of Default so long as
any appropriate legal proceeding which may have been duly
initiated for the review of such judgment shall not have been
finally terminated or the period within which such proceeding
may be initiated shall not have expired; |
|
|
(m) |
Liens securing Indebtedness of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company that does not exceed
10,000,000 at
any one time outstanding; |
|
|
(n) |
Liens securing Acquired Indebtedness incurred pursuant to the
first paragraph of the covenant described under the caption
Certain Covenants Incurrence of
Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified Stock, provided
that such Liens (1) secured such Acquired Indebtedness at
the time of and prior to the incurrence of such Acquired
Indebtedness by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company and were not granted in connection with, or in
anticipation of, such incurrence, and (2) do not extend to
any property or asset of the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries other than the property or asset that secured the
Acquired Indebtedness prior to the time that it became Acquired
Indebtedness of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company; and |
|
|
(o) |
Liens securing Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness with respect
to any Indebtedness secured by Liens referred to in
clauses (c), (d), (g), (h), (k) and (n) above and
in this clause (o). |
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness means any
Indebtedness of the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries issued in exchange for, or the net proceeds of
which are used to extend, refinance, renew, replace, defease or
refund other Indebtedness of the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries; provided, however, that:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the principal amount (or accreted value, if applicable) of such
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness does not exceed the principal
amount of (or accreted value, if applicable), plus premium, if
any, and accrued interest on, the Indebtedness so extended,
refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded (plus the
amount of expenses incurred in connection therewith); |
|
|
(b) |
such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness has a final maturity
date no earlier than the final maturity date of, and has a
Weighted Average Life to Maturity equal to or greater than the
Weighted Average Life to Maturity of, the Indebtedness being
extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded; |
|
|
(c) |
if the Indebtedness being extended, refinanced, renewed,
replaced, defeased or refunded is subordinated in right of
payment to the Notes, such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness is
subordinated in right of payment to the Notes on terms at least
as favorable, taken as a whole, to the holders of the Notes as
those contained in the documentation governing the Indebtedness
being extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or
refunded; and |
185
|
|
|
|
(d) |
if the Company is the obligor on the Indebtedness being
extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded,
then such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness is solely
Indebtedness of the Company, |
provided, however, that a Restricted Subsidiary that is
also a Guarantor may guarantee Permitted Refinancing
Indebtedness incurred by the Company, whether or not such
Restricted Subsidiary was an obligor or guarantor of the
Indebtedness being extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced,
defeased or refunded; provided further, however, that if
such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness is subordinated to the
Notes, such guarantee shall be subordinated to such Restricted
Subsidiarys Subsidiary Guarantee to at least the same
extent.
Person means any individual, corporation,
partnership, joint venture, association, joint-stock company,
trust, unincorporated organization, limited liability company or
government or other entity.
Qualified Equity Offering means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
any issuance and sale of Equity Interests (other than
Disqualified Stock) of the Company pursuant to an underwritten
offering registered under the Securities Act; or |
|
|
(b) |
any other issuance and sale of Equity Interests (other than
Disqualified Stock) of the Company so long as, at the time of
consummation of such sale, the Company has a class of common
equity securities (including American depositary shares)
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) or Section 12(g)
under the Exchange Act. |
Restricted Investment means an Investment
other than a Permitted Investment.
Restricted Subsidiary of a Person means any
Subsidiary of such Person that is not an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
Securities Act means the U.S. Securities
Act of 1933, as amended.
Sercel Inc. means Sercel Inc., a Texas
corporation with its head office in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and a
Restricted Subsidiary of the Company as of the Issue Date.
Sercel S.A. means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Sercel S.A., a French limited liability corporation with its
head office in Carquefou, France, and a Restricted Subsidiary of
the Company as of the Issue Date; and/or |
|
|
(b) |
any company (including Sercel Holding S.A.) that holds all of
the outstanding Capital Stock of either or both of Sercel S.A.
and Sercel Inc. (other than directors qualifying shares
and Capital Stock held by other statutorily required minority
shareholders). |
Significant Subsidiary means any Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company that would be a significant
subsidiary as defined in Article 1,
Rule 1-02 of
Regulation S-X,
promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act, as such Regulation
is in effect on the date of the Indenture.
Stated Maturity means, with respect to any
mandatory sinking fund or other installment of interest or
principal on any series of Indebtedness, the date on which such
payment of interest or principal was scheduled to be paid in the
original documentation governing such Indebtedness, and shall
not include any contingent obligations to repay, redeem or
purchase any such interest or principal prior to the date
originally scheduled for the payment thereof.
Strategic Assets means assets or rights
(other than assets that would be classified as current assets in
accordance with GAAP) of the kind used or usable by the Company
or its Restricted Subsidiaries in the business of providing
services or software products to the oil and gas industry or
manufacturing equipment for use by the oil and gas industry (or
any business that is reasonably complementary or related thereto
as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors).
186
Subsidiary means, with respect to any Person:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
any corporation, association or other business entity of which
more than 50% of the total voting power of shares of Capital
Stock entitled (without regard to the occurrence of any
contingency) to vote in the election of directors, managers or
trustees thereof is at the time owned or controlled, directly or
indirectly, by such Person or one or more of the other
Subsidiaries of that Person (or a combination thereof); |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
any partnership (1) the sole general partner or the
managing general partner of which is such Person or a Subsidiary
of such Person or (2) the only general partners of which are
such Person or of one or more Subsidiaries of such Person (or
any combination thereof); and |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
any other Person whose results for financial reporting purposes
are consolidated with those of such Person in accordance with
GAAP. |
Subsidiary Guarantee means the guarantee by
each Guarantor of the Companys obligations under the
Indenture and the Notes (including any Additional Notes),
executed pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture.
Treasury Rate means, as of any redemption
date in respect of the Notes, the yield to maturity as of such
redemption date of United States Treasury securities with a
constant maturity (as compiled and published in the most recent
Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15(519) that has become
publicly available at least two business days prior to the
redemption date (or, if such Statistical Release is no longer
published, any publicly available source of similar market
data)) most nearly equal to the period from the redemption date
to May 15, 2010; provided, however, that if the
period from the redemption date to May 15, 2010 is less
than one year, the weekly average yield on actually traded
United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant
maturity of one year shall be used.
Unrestricted Subsidiary means any Subsidiary
of the Company that is designated by the Board of Directors as
an Unrestricted Subsidiary pursuant to a Board Resolution and
any Subsidiary of an Unrestricted Subsidiary. The Board of
Directors may designate a Subsidiary as an Unrestricted
Subsidiary only to the extent that such Subsidiary at the time
of such designation:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
has no Indebtedness other than Non-Recourse Debt; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
is not party to any agreement, contract, arrangement or
understanding with the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of
the Company unless such agreement, contract, arrangement or
understanding does not violate the terms of the Indenture
described under the caption Certain
Covenants Transactions with
Affiliates; and |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
is a Person with respect to which neither the Company nor any of
its Restricted Subsidiaries has any direct or indirect
obligation (1) to subscribe for additional Equity Interests
or (2) to maintain or preserve such Persons financial
condition or to cause such Person to achieve any specified
levels of operating results. |
Any such designation by the Board of Directors shall be
evidenced to the Trustee by filing with the Trustee the Board
Resolution giving effect to such designation and an
Officers Certificate certifying that such designation
complied with the foregoing conditions and was permitted by the
covenant described under the caption Certain
Covenants Restricted Payments. If, at any
time, any Unrestricted Subsidiary would fail to meet the
preceding requirements as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, it shall
thereafter cease to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary for purposes
of the Indenture and any Indebtedness of such Subsidiary shall
be deemed to be incurred by a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company as of such date (and, if such Indebtedness is not
permitted to be incurred as of such date under the covenant
described under the caption Certain
Covenants Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock, the Company shall be in default of
such covenant). The Board of Directors may at any time designate
any Unrestricted Subsidiary to be a Restricted Subsidiary,
provided that such designation shall be deemed to be an
incurrence of Indebtedness by a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company of any outstanding Indebtedness of such Unrestricted
Subsidiary and such designation shall only be permitted if:
187
|
|
|
|
(1) |
such Indebtedness is permitted under the covenant described
under the caption Certain
Covenants Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock; calculated on a pro forma basis as if
such designation had occurred at the beginning of the
four-quarter reference period; and |
|
|
(2) |
no Default or Event of Default would be in existence following
such designation. |
U.S. Dollar Equivalent means, with
respect to any monetary amount in a currency other than
U.S. dollars, at or as of any time for the determination
thereof, the amount of U.S. dollars obtained by converting
such foreign currency involved in such computation into
U.S. dollars at the spot rate for the purchase of
U.S. dollars with the applicable foreign currency as quoted
by Reuters (or, if Reuters ceases to provide such spot
quotations, by any other reputable service as is providing such
spot quotations, as selected by the Company) at approximately
11:00 a.m. (New York City time) on the date not more than
two business days prior to such determination.
Voting Stock of any Person as of any date
means the Capital Stock of such Person that is at the time
entitled to vote in the election of the board of directors,
managers or trustees of such Person.
Weighted Average Life to Maturity means, when
applied to any Indebtedness at any date, the number of years
obtained by dividing (a) the sum of the products obtained
by multiplying (1) the amount of each then remaining
installment, sinking fund, serial maturity or other required
payments of principal, including payment at final maturity, in
respect thereof, by (2) the number of years (calculated to
the nearest one twelfth) that will elapse between such date and
the making of such payment, by (b) the then outstanding
principal amount of such Indebtedness.
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary of any
Person means a Restricted Subsidiary of such Person to the
extent that:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
all of the outstanding Capital Stock or other ownership
interests of which (other than directors qualifying shares
and Capital Stock held by other statutorily required minority
shareholders) shall at the time be owned directly or indirectly
by such Person; or |
|
|
(b) |
such Restricted Subsidiary is organized in a foreign
jurisdiction and is required by the applicable laws and
regulations of such foreign jurisdiction or its governmental
agencies, authorities or state-owned businesses to be partially
owned by the government of such foreign jurisdiction or
individual or corporate citizens of such foreign jurisdiction or
another foreign jurisdiction in order for such Restricted
Subsidiary to transact business in such foreign jurisdiction,
provided that such Person, by contract or otherwise,
controls the business and management of such Restricted
Subsidiary. |
Further, in relation to the Company, the term Wholly Owned
Restricted Subsidiary includes any Foreign Restricted
Subsidiary so long as the direct or indirect ownership interest
of the Company in its Capital Stock is no less than at the Issue
Date.
188
DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW NOTES
General
You can find the definitions of certain terms used in this
description of the new notes under the caption
Certain Definitions. In this
description, the word Company refers only to
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas, S.A.,
and not to any of its subsidiaries.
The Notes will be issued pursuant to the Indenture dated as of
the Issue Date among the Company, the Guarantors and The Bank of
New York Trust Company, National Association, as trustee (the
Trustee). The terms of the Notes will include
those stated in the Indenture and those made part of the
Indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as
amended (the Trust Indenture Act).
The following description is a summary of the material
provisions of the Indenture. It does not restate the Indenture
in its entirety. We urge you to read the Indenture because it,
and not this description, will define your rights as holders of
the Notes.
Copies of the Indenture are available for inspection during
normal business hours at the office of the Company referred to
under the caption Available Information,
at the corporate trust office of the Trustee at 601 Travis
Street, 18th Floor, Houston, Texas 77002, and at the
specified office of each Paying Agent, including, for so long as
the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, at the
specified office of the Paying Agent in Luxembourg. Holders of
the Notes are entitled to the benefit of, are bound by, and are
deemed to have notice of, all the provisions of the Indenture.
Brief Description of the Notes
The Notes will, upon issuance:
|
|
|
|
|
be general senior, unsecured obligations of the Company; |
|
|
|
rank equally in right of payment to all existing and future
senior, unsecured indebtedness of the Company, except for any
liabilities preferred by law; |
|
|
|
rank senior in right of payment to all existing and future
subordinated indebtedness of the Company; |
|
|
|
be guaranteed on a senior, unsecured basis by certain
Subsidiaries of the Company as described below; and |
|
|
|
be effectively subordinated to all existing and future
indebtedness of Subsidiaries of the Company that are not
Guarantors. |
Holders of existing and future secured indebtedness of the
Company and its Subsidiaries, including loans under the existing
Credit Facilities, will have claims with respect to the assets
constituting collateral for such secured indebtedness that are
superior to the claims of the holders of the Notes. Accordingly,
the Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees will be effectively
subordinated to claims of secured creditors of the Company and
the Guarantors to the extent of such collateral.
Only certain Subsidiaries of the Company will guarantee the
Notes. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or
reorganization of any Subsidiary of the Company that is not a
Guarantor, that Subsidiary will pay the holders of its debt and
its trade creditors before it will be able to distribute any of
its assets to the Company.
Assuming that the merger and the financing transactions,
including the offering of the notes and the use of the proceeds
thereof had occurred as at September 30, 2006, there would
have been
947 million
of outstanding indebtedness including accrued interest
effectively senior to the Notes as at September 30, 2006,
of which
926 million
would have been secured and the Initial Guarantors (as defined
under the caption Subsidiary
Guarantees Guarantors) (excluding their
Subsidiaries that are not Guarantors) would have had outstanding
external total indebtedness of
1,540 million.
Indebtedness of the Initial Guarantors is included in the total
Indebtedness of the Company and its Subsidiaries. In addition,
as at September 30, 2006, the Company and its Subsidiaries
had availability under their Credit Facilities of
$20 million, which if drawn would have been secured.
189
Each of the Initial Guarantors, other than Sercel Canada, is an
obligor under the senior facilities and the French revolving
facility. The Indenture will permit the Company and its
Subsidiaries (including the Guarantors) to incur additional
Indebtedness, including certain additional secured Indebtedness.
As of the date of the Indenture, all of the Companys
Subsidiaries will be Restricted Subsidiaries. Under certain
circumstances, the Company will be able to designate current or
future Subsidiaries as Unrestricted Subsidiaries. Unrestricted
Subsidiaries will not be subject to the restrictive covenants
set forth in the Indenture and will not guarantee the Notes.
Notes will be issued in this offering in an aggregate principal
amount of $300,000,000 (the New Notes).
The Indenture provides the Company the flexibility of issuing
additional Notes in the future in an unlimited amount; however,
any issuance of such additional Notes would be subject to the
covenant described under the caption Certain
Covenants Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock. The New Notes and any such additional
Notes are collectively referred to as the
Notes in this Description of the New
Notes.
Whenever the covenants or default provisions or definitions in
the Indenture refer to an amount in U.S. dollars or euros,
that amount will be deemed to refer to the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent or the Euro Equivalent, respectively, of the amount
of any obligation denominated in any other currency or
currencies, including composite currencies.
Any other determination of the U.S. Dollar Equivalent or
the Euro Equivalent for any purpose under the Indenture will be
determined as of a date of determination as described in the
definitions of U.S. Dollar Equivalent and
Euro Equivalent under Certain
Definitions and, in any case, no subsequent change in the
U.S. Dollar Equivalent or the Euro Equivalent after the
applicable date of determination will cause such determination
to be modified.
Principal, Maturity and Interest
The New Notes will be limited in aggregate principal amount to
$300,000,000 and will mature on May 15, 2017. Interest
on the Notes will accrue at the rate of % per
annum and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and
November 15 of each year, commencing on May 15, 2007, in
the case of the New Notes, to holders of record on the
immediately preceding May 1 and November 1. Interest on the
New Notes will accrue from the most recent date to which
interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from
the Issue Date. Interest will be computed on the basis of a
360-day year comprised
of twelve 30-day months.
Payment and Paying Agents
Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Notes will be
payable in U.S. dollars at the office or agency of the
Company maintained for such purpose in the continental United
States and, subject to any fiscal or other laws and regulations
applicable thereto, at the specified offices of any other Paying
Agent appointed by the Company for such purpose, or, at the
option of the Company, payment of interest may be made by check
mailed to holders of the Notes at their respective addresses set
forth in the register of holders; provided, however, that
all payments with respect to Notes the holders of which have
given wire transfer instructions to the Company or a Paying
Agent will be required to be made by wire transfer of
immediately available funds to the accounts specified by the
holders thereof. The principal of the Notes will be payable only
upon surrender of any Note at the Corporate Trust Office of
the Trustee or at the specified offices of any other Paying
Agent.
If the due date for payment of the principal in respect of any
Note is not a business day at the place in which it is presented
for payment, the holder thereof will not be entitled to payment
of the amount due until the next succeeding business day at such
place and will not be entitled to any further interest or other
payment in respect of any such delay.
The Indenture provides that any money deposited with the Trustee
or any Paying Agent in trust for the payment of the principal
of, premium, if any, or interest on any Note and remaining
unclaimed for two years after such principal, premium, if any,
or interest have become due and payable will be paid to the
Company, and will be discharged from such trust; and the holder
of such Note will thereafter, as an unsecured general creditor,
look
190
only to the Company for payment thereof, and all liability of
the Trustee or such Paying Agent with respect to such money will
thereupon cease.
The Corporate Trust Office of the Trustee in Dallas, Texas
will initially be designated as the Companys Paying Agent
for payments with respect to the Notes. So long as the Notes are
listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such
stock exchange so require, the Company will maintain a Paying
Agent in Luxembourg. Dexia Banque Internationale à
Luxembourg, société anonyme will initially be
designated as the Companys Paying Agent in Luxembourg and
as the Companys agent where Notes may be surrendered for
registration of transfer and exchange. The Company may at any
time designate one or more additional Paying Agents or rescind
the designation of any Paying Agent or approve a change in the
office through which any Paying Agent acts, except that the
Company will be required to maintain a Paying Agent in the
continental United States. The Company will give notice to each
holder of Notes, in the manner described under the caption
Notices, of any change in Paying Agents.
Subsidiary Guarantees
The obligations of each Guarantor under its Subsidiary Guarantee
will be general senior, unsecured obligations of such Guarantor,
ranking pari passu in right of payment with all other
senior indebtedness of such Guarantor and senior in right of
payment to any subordinated indebtedness of such Guarantor. The
Subsidiary Guarantees will be joint and several obligations of
the Guarantors. Holders of existing and future secured
indebtedness of the Guarantors, including loans under the
existing Credit Facilities (including the senior facilities and
the French revolving facility) will have claims with respect to
the assets constituting collateral for such secured indebtedness
that are superior to the claims of the holders of the Notes.
The Indenture provides that the obligations of each Guarantor
under its Subsidiary Guarantee will be limited to the maximum
amount as will, after giving effect to such maximum amount and
all other contingent and fixed liabilities of such Guarantor
that are relevant under bankruptcy, fraudulent conveyance and
fraudulent transfer and similar laws, and after giving effect to
any collections from, rights to receive contribution from or
payments made by or on behalf of any other Guarantor in respect
of the obligations of such other Guarantor under its Subsidiary
Guarantee, result in the obligations of such Guarantor under its
Subsidiary Guarantee not constituting a fraudulent transfer or
conveyance. In addition, the obligations of each Guarantor under
its Subsidiary Guarantee shall be limited to the extent required
by applicable law.
Only certain Subsidiaries of the Company will guarantee the
Notes. On the Issue Date, the Notes will be guaranteed by
CGGVeritas Services Inc., Veritas DGC Land Inc., Veritas
Geophysical Corporation, Veritas Investments Inc., Viking
Maritime Inc., Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC, Veritas DGC
Asia Pacific Ltd. and Alitheia Resources Inc. (the
Veritas Guarantors), Sercel Inc., Sercel
Canada Ltd. and Sercel Australia Pty Ltd (the Sercel
Guarantors) and CGG Americas, Inc., CGG Canada
Services Ltd. and CGG Marine Resources Norge A/ S (the
CGG Guarantors, and together with the Veritas
Guarantors and the Sercel Guarantors, the Initial
Guarantors). For more information about the Initial
Guarantors, see General Information and
note 31D to the CGG consolidated annual financial
statements, Note 4 to CGGs consolidated interim financial
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
Note 16 to the Veritas consolidated financial statements
and Note 11 to Veritas consolidated interim financial
statements for the three months ended October 31, 2006, all
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The Companys other
Subsidiaries will not initially guarantee the Notes and, in
certain circumstances described below under the caption
Release, the Company may elect to have
the Sercel Guarantors released from their Subsidiary Guarantees.
In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of
any Subsidiary of the Company that is not a Guarantor, that
Subsidiary will pay the holders of its debt and its trade
creditors before it will be able to distribute any of its assets
to the Company.
The Veritas Guarantors (excluding their subsidiaries that have
not guaranteed the notes) generated, before consolidation
entries, $384.1 million of revenues, $65.5 million of
operating income and $49.5 million of net income in the
year ended July 31, 2006 and held $807.9 million of
total assets before consolidation entries. They
191
generated, before consolidation entries, $112.5 million of
revenues, $15.2 million of operating income and
$20.4 million of net income in the three month-period ended
October 31, 2006 and held $781.3 million of total
assets before consolidation entries as at October 31, 2006.
The CGG Guarantors (excluding their subsidiaries that have not
guaranteed the Notes) generated, before consolidation entries,
161.0 million
of revenues,
49.8 million
of operating income and
30.7 million
of net income in the year ended December 31, 2005 and held
394.4 million
of total assets before consolidation entries. They generated,
before consolidation entries,
194.2 million
of revenues,
92.8 million
of operating income and
54.7 million
of net income in the nine-month period ended September 30,
2006 and held
402.1 million
of total assets before consolidation entries as at
September 30, 2006.
The Sercel Guarantors (excluding their subsidiaries that have
not guaranteed the Notes) generated, before consolidation
entries,
146.5 million
of revenues,
10.9 million
of operating income and
6.3 million
of net income in the year ended December 31, 2005 and held
205.9 million
of total assets before consolidation entries as at
December 31, 2005. They generated, before consolidation
entries,
229.3 million
of revenues,
33.6 million
of operating income and
22.3 million
of net income in the nine-month period ended September 30,
2006 and held
208.7 million
of total assets before consolidation entries as at
September 30, 2006. The revenue, operating income, net
income and assets of the Sercel Guarantors are included in those
of the Initial Guarantors. In the circumstances described under
the caption Certain Covenants Guarantees of
Certain Indebtedness by Restricted Subsidiaries the
Indenture will require certain of the Companys other
Subsidiaries to become Guarantors. For more information about
the Initial Guarantors, see General Information.
In addition, a Restricted Subsidiary may become a Guarantor, at
its option, by executing a supplemental indenture providing for
a Subsidiary Guarantee in accordance with the provisions of the
Indenture.
The Indenture provides that, in the event of (a) a
transfer, conveyance, sale or other disposition of any Capital
Stock of Sercel S.A. or any Sercel Guarantor or (b) the
issue by Sercel S.A. or any Sercel Guarantor of any Equity
Interests, in either case to any Person other than the Company
or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, the Company may elect
to have the Sercel Guarantors released and relieved of any
obligations under their Subsidiary Guarantees, provided that
the Net Proceeds of such issuance, transfer, conveyance,
sale or other disposition are applied in accordance with the
covenant described below under the caption Put
Option of Holders Asset Sales and the Sercel
Guarantors have no other guarantees of Indebtedness of the
Company or any other Guarantors (other than Permitted
Guarantees) then outstanding. If a Restricted Subsidiary has
become a Guarantor at its option, it may thereafter be released
and relieved of its obligations under its Subsidiary Guarantee
at its option, provided that such Guarantor has no
guarantee of Indebtedness of the Company or any Guarantor (other
than Permitted Guarantees) then outstanding. The Indenture
further provides that, for purposes of the covenant described
under the caption Certain
Covenants Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock, the release of any Subsidiary
Guarantee pursuant to provisions described in this paragraph
shall be deemed to be an incurrence by the Restricted Subsidiary
whose Subsidiary Guarantee is being released of all Indebtedness
then held by such Restricted Subsidiary.
The Indenture provides that, in the event of a transfer,
conveyance, sale or other disposition (including by way of
merger or consolidation) of all or substantially all of the
assets or all of the Capital Stock of any Guarantor, then such
Guarantor will be released and relieved of any obligations under
its Subsidiary Guarantee and the Indenture, provided that the
Net Proceeds of such transfer, conveyance, sale or other
disposition are applied in accordance with the covenant
described below under the caption Put Option
of Holders Asset Sales. A Guarantor will
likewise be released and relieved of its obligations under its
Subsidiary Guarantee upon the release of any guarantee of
Indebtedness of the Company that required such Guarantor to
guarantee the Notes pursuant to the covenant described below
under the caption Certain
Covenants Guarantees of Certain Indebtedness by
Restricted Subsidiaries except a discharge or release by
or as a result of direct payment under such guarantee,
provided that the Guarantor has no other guarantee of
Indebtedness of the Company or any Guarantor (other than
Permitted Guarantees) then outstanding. The Indenture also
provides that, if the Board of Directors designates a Guarantor
to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary, then such Guarantor will be
released and
192
relieved of any obligations under its Subsidiary Guarantee and
the Indenture, provided that such designation is
conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of the
Indenture.
The Indenture provides that, for so long as a Restricted
Subsidiary provides a Subsidiary Guarantee pursuant to the terms
of the Indenture, such Guarantor may not consolidate with or
merge with or into (whether or not such Guarantor is the
surviving Person) another Person (other than the Company or
another Guarantor), unless:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or
merger (if other than such Guarantor) shall execute a Subsidiary
Guarantee and deliver an opinion of counsel in accordance with
the terms of the Indenture; |
|
|
(b) |
immediately after giving effect to such transaction, no Default
or Event of Default exists; |
|
|
(c) |
such Guarantor, or any Person formed by or surviving any such
consolidation or merger, would have a Consolidated Net Worth
(immediately after giving effect to such transaction) equal to
or greater than the Consolidated Net Worth of such Guarantor
immediately preceding the transaction; and |
|
|
(d) |
the Company would be permitted by virtue of the Companys
pro forma Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio,
immediately after giving effect to such transaction, to incur at
least 1.00 of
additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio test set forth in the covenant described under
the caption Certain Covenants
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified
Stock. |
At any time prior to May 15, 2012, the Company may redeem
the Notes at its option, in whole or in part, at a redemption
price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus the
Applicable Premium as of, and accrued and unpaid interest to,
the date of redemption.
The Notes will also be redeemable at the Companys option
on or after May 15, 2012, in whole or in part, at the
redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount)
set forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the
applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the
12-month period
beginning May 15 of the years indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
2012
|
|
|
|
% |
2013
|
|
|
|
% |
2014
|
|
|
|
% |
2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Further, prior to May 15, 2010, the Company may redeem on
any one or more occasions Notes representing up to 35% of the
sum of the aggregate principal amount of the New Notes plus any
other Notes originally issued under the Indenture after the
Issue Date at a redemption price
of %
of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid
interest thereon to the redemption date, with the net cash
proceeds of one or more Qualified Equity Offerings, provided
that (a) Notes representing at least 65% of the sum of
the aggregate principal amount of the New Notes plus any other
Notes originally issued under the Indenture after the Issue Date
remain outstanding immediately after the occurrence of each such
redemption and (b) such redemption occurs within
90 days of the date of the closing of each such Qualified
Equity Offering.
Selection and Notice
If less than all of the Notes are to be redeemed at any time,
the Trustee will select Notes for redemption as follows:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
if the Notes are listed, in compliance with the requirements of
the principal securities exchange on which the Notes are
listed; or |
193
|
|
|
|
(b) |
if the Notes are not so listed, on a pro rata basis, by
lot or by such method as the Trustee shall deem fair and
appropriate. |
No Notes of $1,000 or less shall be redeemed in part.
Notices of redemption shall be mailed by first class mail at
least 30 but not more than 60 days before the redemption
date to each holder of Notes to be redeemed at its registered
address. For so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg
Stock Exchange and for so long as the rules of such exchange
require, notices of redemption will be published once by the
Trustee, not less than five business days prior to the
redemption date, in a newspaper having general circulation in
Luxembourg, which is expected to be DWort or if
such newspaper ceases to be published or timely publication in
it will not be practicable, in such other newspaper as the
Trustee deems necessary to give fair and reasonable notice to
the holders of Notes. Notices may also be published on the
internet site of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange at www.bourse.lu.
Notices of redemption may not be conditional.
If any Note is to be redeemed in part only, the notice of
redemption that relates to that Note shall state the portion of
the principal amount thereof to be redeemed. A new Note in
principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion of the original
Note will be issued in the name of the holder thereof upon
surrender of the original Note. Notes called for redemption
become due on the date fixed for redemption. On and after the
redemption date, interest will cease to accrue on Notes or
portions of them called for redemption.
Redemption for Taxation Reasons
The Indenture provides that the Company may at any time redeem,
in whole but not in part, the outstanding Notes at a redemption
price of 100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and
unpaid interest thereon to the date of redemption if it or any
Guarantor has become or would become obligated to pay any
Additional Amounts (as defined under the caption
Additional Amounts) in respect of the
Notes as a result of:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
(1) any change in or amendment to the laws or treaties (or
regulations or rulings promulgated thereunder) of a Relevant
Taxing Jurisdiction (as defined under the caption
Additional Amounts) or (2) any
change in or amendment to any official position regarding the
application or interpretation of such laws, treaties,
regulations or rulings, which change or amendment is announced
or is effective on or after the date of the Indenture; and |
|
|
(b) |
such obligation cannot be avoided by the Company or any such
Guarantor taking reasonable measures available to it. |
Notwithstanding the preceding, no notice of redemption will be
given earlier than 60 days prior to the earliest date on
which the Company could be obligated to pay such Additional
Amounts if a payment in respect of the Notes was then due. Prior
to giving notice of any such redemption, the Company will
deliver to the Trustee (y) an Officers Certificate
stating that the obligation to pay Additional Amounts cannot be
avoided by the Company or any such Guarantor taking reasonable
measures available to it and (z) a written opinion of an
independent legal counsel to the Company to the effect that the
circumstances referred to above exist.
Additional Amounts
The Indenture provides that payments made by or on behalf of the
Company or any Guarantor under or with respect to the Notes or
the Subsidiary Guarantees will be made free and clear of and
without withholding or deduction for or on account of any
present or future tax, duty, levy, interest, assessment or other
governmental charge (Taxes) imposed or levied
by or on behalf of any jurisdiction in which the Company or any
Guarantor (including any successor entities), is then organized
or resident for tax purposes or any political subdivision
thereof or therein or any jurisdiction by or through which
payment is made (each, a Relevant Taxing
Jurisdiction), unless the Company or any Guarantor (or
any Paying Agent) is required to withhold or deduct Taxes under
the laws of the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction or by the
interpretation or administration thereof by the relevant taxing
authority. If the Company or any Guarantor (or any Paying Agent)
is so required to withhold or deduct any amount for or on
account of Taxes from any payment made under or with respect to
the Notes or the
194
Subsidiary Guarantees, the Company or any such Guarantor (and
each Paying Agent) will pay to each holder of the Notes that are
outstanding on the date of the required payment, such additional
amounts (Additional Amounts) as may be
necessary so that the net amount received by such holder
(including the Additional Amounts) after such withholding or
deduction will not be less than the amount such holder would
have received if such Taxes had not been withheld or deducted,
provided that no Additional Amounts will be payable with respect
to any Note:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
surrendered by the holder thereof for payment of principal more
than 30 days after the later of (1) the date on which
such payment first became due and (2) if the full amount
payable has not been received by or on behalf of the relevant
holder on or prior to such due date, the date on which, the full
amount having been so received, notice to that effect shall have
been given to the holders by the Trustee, except to the extent
that the holder would have been entitled to such Additional
Amounts on surrendering such Note for payment on the last day of
the applicable 30-day
period; |
|
|
(b) |
if any tax, assessment or other governmental charge is imposed
or withheld by reason of the failure to comply by the holder or,
if different, the beneficial owner (ayant-droit) of the
Note with a request addressed to such holder or beneficial owner
to provide information, documents or other evidence concerning
the nationality, residence, identity or connection with the
Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction of such holder or beneficial owner
which is required or imposed by a statute, treaty, regulation or
administrative practice of the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction as a
precondition to exemption from all or part of such tax,
assessment or governmental charge; |
|
|
(c) |
held by or on behalf of a holder who is liable for Taxes in
respect of such Note by reason of having some connection with
the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction other than the mere purchase,
holding or disposition of any Note, or the receipt of payments
made by or on behalf of the Company or any Guarantor in respect
thereof or any Subsidiary Guarantee, including, without
limitation, such holder being or having been a citizen or
resident thereof or being or having been present or engaged in a
trade or business therein or having had a permanent
establishment therein; |
|
|
(d) |
on account of any estate, inheritance, gift, sale, transfer,
personal property or other similar tax, assessment or other
governmental charge; |
|
|
(e) |
except in the case of the winding up of the Company or any
Guarantor, any Note surrendered for payment in the Republic of
France; |
|
|
(f) |
any withholding or deduction imposed on a payment to an
individual which is required to be made pursuant to any law
implementing or complying with, or introduced in order to
conform to European Council Directive 2003/48/ EC or any other
Directive implementing the conclusions of the ECOFIN Council
meeting of November 26-27, 2000 on the taxation of savings
income or any agreement between the European Community and any
jurisdiction providing for equivalent measures; |
|
|
(g) |
as a result of any combination of (a), (b), (c), (d),
(e) or (f) or with respect to any payment made by or
on behalf of the Company or any Guarantor in respect of any Note
or Subsidiary Guarantee to any holder who is a fiduciary or
partnership or other than the sole beneficial owner of such
payment to the extent that a beneficiary or settlor or
beneficial owner would not have been entitled to any Additional
Amounts had such beneficiary or settlor or beneficial owner been
the holder; or |
|
|
(h) |
if any withholding or deduction imposed or levied on a payment
to a Luxembourg resident individual is required to be made
pursuant to the Luxembourg law of 23 December 2005. |
The Company or any Guarantor will also make such withholding or
deduction and remit the full amount deducted or withheld to the
relevant authority in accordance with applicable law. The
Company will furnish, within 60 days after the date the
payment of any Taxes is due pursuant to applicable law, to the
Trustee, copies of tax receipts (to the extent received from the
relevant tax authorities in the usual course or as generally
provided) evidencing that such payment has been made by the
Company or any Guarantor. The Trustee will make such evidence
available to the holders upon request.
195
At least 30 days prior to each date on which any payment
under or with respect to the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees
is due and payable, if the Company or any Guarantor becomes
obligated to pay Additional Amounts with respect to such
payment, the Company will deliver to each Paying Agent an
Officers Certificate stating the fact that such Additional
Amounts will be payable, and the amount so payable and will set
forth such other information as necessary to enable such Paying
Agent to pay such Additional Amounts to the holders of the Notes
on the payment date. Whenever in the Indenture or this
prospectus there is mentioned, in any context, (a) the
payment of principal (and premium, if any), (b) purchase
prices in connection with a purchase of the Notes,
(c) interest or (d) any other amount payable on or
with respect to any of the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees,
such mention is deemed to include mention of the payment of
Additional Amounts provided for in this section to the extent,
that, in such context, Additional Amounts are, were or would be
payable in respect thereof.
The Company or a Guarantor, as the case may be, will pay any
present or future stamp, court or documentary taxes or any other
excise or property taxes, charges or similar levies that arise
in the United States, the Republic of France or in any
jurisdiction in which a Paying Agent is located from the initial
issue or registration of the Notes or on the enforcement of any
payments with respect to the Notes or any Subsidiary Guarantee.
The obligations of the Company or any Guarantor described in
this Additional Amounts section will
survive the satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture.
Mandatory Redemption
Except as set forth below under the caption
Put Option of Holders, the Company will
not be required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund
payments with respect to the Notes.
Put Option of Holders
The Indenture provides that, upon the occurrence of a Change of
Control, each holder will have the right to require the Company
to purchase all or any portion (equal to $1,000 or an integral
multiple thereof) of the holders Notes, pursuant to the
offer described below (the Change of Control
Offer), at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of
the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid
interest thereon to the date of purchase (the Change of
Control Payment).
Within 30 days following a Change of Control, the Company
will give notice to each holder of Notes, in the manner
described under the caption Notices, and
the Trustee describing the transaction that constitutes the
Change of Control and offering to purchase the Notes on the date
specified in such notice, which date shall be no earlier than
30 days and no later than 60 days from the date such
notice is given (the Change of Control Payment
Date), pursuant to the procedures required by the
Indenture and described in such notice. The Company will comply
with the requirements of
Rule 14e-1 under
the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations
to the extent such laws and regulations are applicable in
connection with the purchase of the Notes as a result of a
Change of Control. To the extent that the provisions of any
securities laws or regulations conflict with the Change of
Control provisions of the Indenture, the Company will comply
with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not
be deemed to have breached its obligations under the Change of
Control provisions of the Indenture by virtue of such conflict.
On or before the Change of Control Payment Date, the Company
will, to the extent lawful:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
accept for payment all Notes or portions thereof properly
tendered pursuant to the Change of Control Offer; |
|
|
(b) |
deposit with the Paying Agent an amount equal to the Change of
Control Payment in respect of all Notes or portions thereof so
tendered; and |
196
|
|
|
|
(c) |
deliver or cause to be delivered to the Trustee the Notes so
accepted together with an Officers Certificate stating the
aggregate principal amount of the Notes or portions thereof
being purchased by the Company. |
The Paying Agent will promptly deliver to each holder of the
Notes so tendered the Change of Control Payment for such Notes,
and the Trustee will promptly authenticate and mail (or cause to
be transferred by book entry) to each holder a new Note equal in
principal amount to any unpurchased portion of the Notes
surrendered, if any; provided, however, that each such
new Note will be in a principal amount of $1,000 or an integral
multiple thereof. The Company will publicly announce the results
of the Change of Control Offer on or as soon as practicable
after the Change of Control Payment Date.
Except as described above with respect to a Change of Control,
the Indenture does not contain provisions that permit the
holders of the Notes to require that the Company purchase or
redeem the Notes in the event of a takeover, recapitalization or
similar transaction. In addition, the Company could enter into
certain transactions, including acquisitions, refinancings or
other recapitalizations, that could affect the Companys
capital structure or the value of the Notes, but that would not
constitute a Change of Control. The occurrence of a Change of
Control may result in a default under the agreement governing
other senior indebtedness of the Company including the term loan
facility, giving the lenders thereunder the right to require the
Company to repay all outstanding obligations thereunder,
possibly limiting the Companys ability to purchase the
Notes upon a Change of Control. The Companys ability to
purchase the Notes following a Change of Control may also be
limited by the Companys then existing financial resources.
Should a Change of Control occur at a time when the Company
lacks sufficient funds to make the Change of Control Payments or
is prohibited from purchasing the Notes under instruments
governing other senior indebtedness (and the Company is unable
to obtain the consent of the holders of such senior indebtedness
or to prepay such senior indebtedness), an Event of Default
would occur under the Indenture. See Events of
Default and Remedies. See Risk Factors
Risks Related to the Notes Although the occurrence
of specific change of control events affecting us will permit
you to require us to repurchase your notes, we may not be able
to repurchase your notes.
The provisions described above that require the Company to make
a Change of Control Offer following a Change of Control will be
applicable regardless of whether any other provisions of the
Indenture are applicable. The Company will not be required to
make a Change of Control Offer following a Change of Control if
a third party makes the Change of Control Offer in the manner,
at the times and otherwise in compliance with the requirements
set forth in the Indenture applicable to a Change of Control
Offer made by the Company and purchases all Notes validly
tendered and not withdrawn under such Change of Control Offer.
A Change of Control will be deemed to have
occurred upon the occurrence of any of the following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition
(other than by merger or consolidation), in one or a series of
related transactions, of all or substantially all of the
properties or assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole; |
|
|
(b) |
the adoption, by holders of Capital Stock of the Company, of a
voluntary plan relating to the liquidation or dissolution of the
Company; |
|
|
(c) |
the consummation of any transaction (including, without
limitation, any merger or consolidation) the result of which is
that any person (as such term is used in
Section 13(d) (3) of the Exchange Act) becomes the
beneficial owner (as such term is defined in
Rule 13d-3 and
Rule 13d-5 under the
Exchange Act), directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, of more than 50% of the voting power of the
outstanding Voting Stock of the Company; or |
|
|
(d) |
the first day on which more than a majority of the members of
the Board of Directors are not Continuing Directors; |
provided, however, that a transaction in which the
Company becomes a Subsidiary of another Person (other than a
Person that is an individual) shall not constitute a Change of
Control if (1) the shareholders of the Company immediately
prior to such transaction beneficially own (as such
term is defined in
Rule 13d-3 and
Rule 13d-5 under
the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, at least a majority of the
197
voting power of the outstanding Voting Stock of such other
Person immediately following the consummation of such
transaction and (2) immediately following the consummation
of such transaction, no person (as such term is
defined above), other than such other Person (but including the
holders of the Equity Interests of such other Person),
beneficially owns (as such term is defined above),
directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, more
than 50% of the voting power of the outstanding Voting Stock of
the Company.
Continuing Directors means, as of any date of
determination, any member of the Board of Directors who
(a) was a member of the Board of Directors on the Issue
Date or (b) was nominated for election to the Board of
Directors with the approval of, or whose election to the Board
of Directors was ratified by, at least a majority of the members
of the Board of Directors who were members of the Board of
Directors on the Issue Date or who were so elected to the Board
of Directors thereafter.
The definition of Change of Control includes an event by which
the Company sells, leases, transfers, conveys or otherwise
disposes of all or substantially all of the properties or assets
of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. Although
there is a limited body of case law interpreting the phrase
substantially all, there is no precise established
definition of the phrase under applicable law. Accordingly, the
ability of a holder of Notes to require the Company to
repurchase such Notes as a result of a sale, lease, transfer,
conveyance or other disposition of less than all of the
properties or assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, may be uncertain.
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, consummate an
Asset Sale (excluding for this purpose an Event of Loss) unless:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be,
receives consideration at the time of such Asset Sale at least
equal to the fair market value (as determined in accordance with
the definition of such term set out below under the caption
Certain Definitions, the results of
which determination shall be set forth in an Officers
Certificate delivered to the Trustee) of the assets or Equity
Interests issued or sold or otherwise disposed of; and |
|
|
(b) |
at least 75% of the consideration therefor received by the
Company or such Restricted Subsidiary is in the form of cash or
Cash Equivalents; |
provided, however, that the amount of (1) any
liabilities (as shown on the Companys or such Restricted
Subsidiarys most recent balance sheet) of the Company or
such Restricted Subsidiary (other than contingent liabilities
and liabilities that are by their terms subordinated to the
Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantee) that are assumed by the
transferee of any such assets pursuant to a customary novation
agreement that releases the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary from further liability and (2) any securities,
notes or other obligations received by the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary from such transferee that are converted
within 180 days by the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary into cash (to the extent of the cash received in that
conversion) shall be deemed to be cash for purposes of this
provision.
Within 365 days after the receipt of any Net Proceeds from
an Asset Sale (including, without limitation, any Event of
Loss), the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary may apply
such Net Proceeds to (a) permanently repay the principal of
any Indebtedness of the Company ranking in right of payment at
least pari passu with the Notes or any Indebtedness of
such Restricted Subsidiary (provided that if such
Restricted Subsidiary is a Guarantor, then such Indebtedness
shall rank in right of payment at least pari passu with
its Subsidiary Guarantee), (b) make capital expenditures in
respect of Strategic Assets or (c) acquire (including by
way of a purchase of assets or a majority of the Voting Stock of
a Person, by merger, by consolidation or otherwise) Strategic
Assets, provided that if the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary enters into a binding agreement to acquire such
Strategic Assets within such
365-day period, but the
consummation of the transactions under such agreement has not
occurred within such
365-day period and such
agreement has not been terminated, then such
365-day period will be
extended by 90 days to permit such consummation. If such
consummation does not occur, or such agreement is terminated
within such 90-day
extension period, then the Company may apply, or cause such
Restricted Subsidiary to apply, within 90 days after the
end of such initial
90-day extension period
or the
198
effective date of such termination, whichever is earlier, such
Net Proceeds as provided in clauses (a) through (c) of
this paragraph. Pending the final application of any such Net
Proceeds, the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary may
temporarily reduce outstanding revolving credit borrowings or
otherwise invest such Net Proceeds in any manner that is not
prohibited by the Indenture. Any Net Proceeds from Asset Sales
that are not applied or invested as provided in clauses (a)
through (c) of this paragraph will be deemed to constitute
Excess Proceeds.
When the aggregate amount of Excess Proceeds exceeds
10,000,000, the
Company will be required to make an offer to all holders of the
Notes (an Asset Sale Offer) to purchase the
maximum principal amount of the Notes that may be purchased out
of the Excess Proceeds at an offer price in cash in an amount
equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and
unpaid interest thereon to the date of purchase, in accordance
with the procedures set forth in the Indenture; provided,
however, that, if the Company is required to apply such
Excess Proceeds to purchase, or to offer to purchase, any
Pari Passu Indebtedness, the Company shall only be
required to offer to purchase the maximum principal amount of
the Notes that may be purchased out of the amount of such Excess
Proceeds multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the
aggregate principal amount of the Notes outstanding and the
denominator of which is the aggregate principal amount of the
Notes outstanding plus the aggregate principal amount of Pari
Passu Indebtedness outstanding. To the extent that the
aggregate principal amount of the Notes tendered pursuant to an
Asset Sale Offer is less than the amount that the Company is
required to purchase, the Company may use any remaining Excess
Proceeds for general corporate purposes in any manner not
prohibited by the Indenture. If the aggregate principal amount
of the Notes surrendered by holders thereof exceeds the amount
that the Company is required to purchase, the Trustee shall
select the Notes to be purchased on a pro rata basis. Upon
completion of such offer to purchase, the amount of Excess
Proceeds shall be reset at zero.
The Company will not, and will not permit any Restricted
Subsidiary to, enter into or suffer to exist any agreement
(other than any agreement governing the Companys or any
Restricted Subsidiarys Credit Facilities) that would place
any restriction of any kind (other than pursuant to law or
regulation) on the ability of the Company to make an Asset Sale
Offer. The agreements governing the Companys existing
Credit Facilities contain and the agreements governing the
Companys future Credit Facilities may contain prohibitions
of certain events, including events that would constitute a
Change of Control or an Asset Sale. In addition, the exercise by
the holders of Notes of their right to require the Company to
repurchase the Notes upon a Change of Control or an Asset Sale
could cause a default under these other agreements, even if the
Change of Control or Asset Sale itself does not, due to the
financial effect of such repurchases on the Company. Finally,
the Companys ability to pay cash to the holders of Notes
upon a repurchase may be limited by the Companys then
existing financial resources. See Risk Factors
Risks Related to the Notes.
The Company will comply with the requirements of
Rule 14e-1 under
the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations
to the extent such laws and regulations are applicable in
connection with the purchase of the Notes as a result of an
Asset Sale Offer. To the extent that the provisions of any
securities laws or regulations conflict with the Asset Sale
provisions of the Indenture, the Company will comply with the
applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be
deemed to have breached its obligations under the Asset Sale
provisions of the Indenture by virtue of such conflict.
Certain Covenants
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire or retire for value
(including, without limitation, in connection with any merger or
consolidation involving the Company) any Equity Interests of the
Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than any
such Equity Interests owned by the Company or any Wholly Owned
Restricted Subsidiary of the Company); |
199
|
|
|
|
(b) |
make any payment on or with respect to, or purchase, redeem,
defease or otherwise acquire or retire for value, any
Indebtedness that is subordinated in right of payment to the
Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees, except a payment of interest
or principal at Stated Maturity; or |
|
|
(c) |
make any Restricted Investment, |
(all such payments and other actions set forth in
clauses (a) through (c) above being collectively
referred to as Restricted Payments), unless,
at the time of and after giving effect to such Restricted
Payment:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof; |
|
|
(2) |
the Company would, at the time of such Restricted Payment and
after giving pro forma effect thereto as if such
Restricted Payment had been made at the beginning of the
applicable four-quarter period, have been permitted to incur at
least 1.00 of
additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio test set forth in the first paragraph of the
covenant described under the caption
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock; and |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
such Restricted Payment, together with (x) the aggregate
amount of all other Restricted Payments made by the Company and
its Restricted Subsidiaries after the Reference Date (excluding
Restricted Payments permitted by clauses (b) through
(e) and, to the extent deducted in computing Consolidated
Net Income, (f) and (g) of the next succeeding
paragraph), and (y) the aggregate amount of all dividends
and other payments or distributions paid subsequent to the
Reference Date on account of the Companys or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries Equity Interests (including,
without limitation, any such payment in connection with any
merger or consolidation involving the Company) or to the direct
or indirect holders of the Companys Equity Interests in
their capacity as such (other than (i) dividends or
distributions payable in Equity Interests (other than
Disqualified Stock) of the Company, (ii) dividends or
distributions payable to the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries or (iii) if the Restricted Subsidiary making
such dividend is not a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary,
dividends to its shareholders on a pro rata basis), is less than
the sum (without duplication) of the following: |
|
|
|
|
(A) |
50% of the cumulative Consolidated Net Income of the Company for
the period (taken as one accounting period) from January 1,
2005 to the end of the Companys most recently ended fiscal
quarter for which financial statements are available at the time
of such Restricted Payment (or, if such Consolidated Net Income
for such period is a deficit, less 100% of such deficit); plus |
|
|
(B) |
100% of the aggregate of (1) the net cash proceeds and
(2) the fair market value of Strategic Assets transferred
or conveyed to the Company (as valued at the time of transfer or
conveyance to the Company, and as determined in the manner
contemplated by the definition of the term fair market
value), in each case received by the Company since the
Reference Date as a contribution to its common equity capital or
from the issue or sale of Equity Interests of the Company (other
than Disqualified Stock) or from the issuance or sale of
Disqualified Stock or debt securities of the Company that have
been converted into, or exchanged or redeemed for, such Equity
Interests (other than any such Equity Interests, Disqualified
Stock or convertible debt securities sold to a Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company and other than Disqualified Stock or
convertible debt securities that have been converted into, or
exchanged or redeemed for, Disqualified Stock); plus |
|
|
(C) |
to the extent that any Restricted Investment that was made after
the Reference Date is sold for cash or otherwise liquidated or
repaid for cash, the cash return of capital with respect to such
Restricted Investment (less the cost of disposition, if any);
plus |
|
|
(D) |
if any Unrestricted Subsidiary is redesignated as a Restricted
Subsidiary, the lesser of (1) an amount equal to the fair
market value of the Investments previously made by the Company
and its Restricted Subsidiaries in such Subsidiary as of the
date of redesignation and (2) the amount of such
Investments. |
200
The preceding provisions will not prohibit any of the following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the payment of any dividend within 60 days after the date
of declaration thereof if at said date of declaration such
payment would have complied with the provisions of the Indenture; |
|
|
(b) |
the redemption, repurchase, retirement, defeasance or other
acquisition of any subordinated Indebtedness of the Company or
any Guarantor or any Equity Interests of the Company or any of
its Restricted Subsidiaries in exchange for, or out of the net
cash proceeds of the substantially concurrent sale (other than
to a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company) of, other Equity
Interests of the Company (other than any Disqualified Stock),
provided that the amount of any such net cash proceeds
that are utilized for any such redemption, purchase, retirement,
defeasance or other acquisition shall be excluded from
clause (3)(B) of the preceding paragraph; |
|
|
(c) |
the defeasance, redemption, purchase, retirement or other
acquisition of subordinated Indebtedness of the Company or any
Guarantor with the net cash proceeds from an incurrence of, or
in exchange for, Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness; |
|
|
(d) |
the payment of any dividend or distribution by a Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company to the Company or any of its Wholly
Owned Restricted Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(e) |
repurchases of Equity Interests deemed to occur upon exercise of
stock options, if such Equity Interests represent a portion of
the exercise price of such stock options; |
|
|
(f) |
so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing, the
repurchase or other acquisition for value of any Equity
Interests of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company for allocation (as a free allocation or otherwise) to
directors, officers and employees of the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries not in excess of
2,500,000 in any
12-month period; |
|
|
(g) |
so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing, the
repurchase, redemption or other acquisition or retirement for
value of any Equity Interests of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company held by any member of the
Companys (or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries)
management pursuant to any management equity subscription
agreement or stock option agreement in effect as of the Issue
Date; provided that the aggregate price paid for all such
repurchased, redeemed, acquired or retired Equity Interests
shall not exceed
1,000,000 in any
12-month period; |
|
|
(h) |
loans or advances in the ordinary course of business to
Affiliates or Persons with which the Company or a Subsidiary may
have contractual arrangements in any jurisdiction reasonably
necessary to be made in connection with conducting the business
of the Company or a Subsidiary in such jurisdiction in a form
that is customary to address foreign investment regulation or
practice in such jurisdiction, in an aggregate amount not to
exceed 2,000,000
outstanding at any one time; |
|
|
(i) |
so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing, advances
constituting Investments or loans to directors, officers and
employees of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries in the
ordinary course of business for bona fide business purposes not
in excess of
1,000,000 at any
one time outstanding; and |
|
|
(j) |
other Restricted Payments not to exceed
15,000,000 in
the aggregate. |
The amount of all Restricted Payments (other than cash) shall be
the fair market value on the date of the Restricted Payment of
the asset(s) or securities proposed to be transferred or issued
by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may
be, pursuant to the Restricted Payment. The fair market value of
any non-cash Restricted Payment shall be determined in the
manner contemplated by the definition of the term fair
market value, and the results of such determination shall
be evidenced by an Officers Certificate delivered to the
Trustee. Not later than 10 business days following the date of
making any Restricted Payment (other than a Restricted Payment
permitted by clauses (b) through (d) of the preceding
paragraph), the Company shall deliver to the Trustee an
Officers Certificate stating that such Restricted Payment
is permitted and setting forth the basis upon which the
calculations required by the covenant Restricted
Payments were computed.
201
|
|
|
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified
Stock |
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly, create, incur, issue, assume, guarantee or otherwise
become directly or indirectly liable, contingently or otherwise,
with respect to (collectively, incur or an
incurrence) any Indebtedness (including,
without limitation, any Acquired Indebtedness) and that the
Company will not issue any Disqualified Stock and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to issue any shares of
preferred stock; provided, however, that the Company or
any Guarantor may incur Indebtedness or issue Disqualified
Stock, and any Restricted Subsidiary may incur Acquired
Indebtedness, in each case if the Consolidated Interest Coverage
Ratio for the Companys most recently ended four full
fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are
available immediately preceding the date on which such
additional Indebtedness is incurred or such Disqualified Stock
is issued would have been at least 3.0 to 1.0, determined on a
pro forma basis (including a pro forma application
of the net proceeds therefrom), as if the additional
Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock had been issued or incurred,
as the case may be, at the beginning of such four-quarter period.
The preceding paragraph will not apply to the incurrence by the
Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of any of the
following Indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Indebtedness under Credit Facilities in an aggregate principal
amount at any one time outstanding not to exceed the greater of
(x) 125,000,000,
plus any fees, premiums, expenses (including costs of
collection), indemnities and similar amounts payable in
connection with such Indebtedness, and less any amounts derived
from Asset Sales and applied to the permanent reduction of
Indebtedness under Credit Facilities in accordance with the
covenant described under the caption Put
Option of Holders Asset Sales and (y) 10%
of the Companys Consolidated Total Assets; |
|
|
(b) |
Existing Indebtedness; |
|
|
(c) |
Hedging Obligations; |
|
|
(d) |
Indebtedness represented by the New Notes or the Subsidiary
Guarantees; |
|
|
(e) |
intercompany Indebtedness between or among the Company and any
of its Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiaries, provided that
(1) if the Company or any Guarantor is the obligor on
such Indebtedness, then the Indebtedness must be unsecured and
expressly subordinated to the prior payment in full in cash of
all of the Companys obligations with respect to the Notes
or such Guarantors obligations under its Subsidiary
Guarantee, as the case may be, and (2) any subsequent
issuance or transfer of Equity Interests that results in any
such Indebtedness being held by a Person other than the Company
or a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, or any
sale or other transfer of any such Indebtedness to a Person that
is neither the Company nor a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary
of the Company, shall be deemed, in each case, to constitute an
incurrence of such Indebtedness by the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, as of the date of
such issuance, sale or other transfer that is not permitted by
this clause (e); |
|
|
(f) |
Indebtedness in respect of bid, performance or surety bonds
issued for the account of the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business, including
guarantees or obligations of the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries with respect to letters of credit
supporting such bid, performance or surety obligations (in each
case other than for an obligation for money borrowed); |
|
|
(g) |
Indebtedness represented by Capital Lease Obligations, mortgage
financings or purchase money obligations (or any guarantee
thereof or indemnity with respect thereto), in each case,
incurred for the purpose of financing all or any part of the
purchase price or cost of construction or improvement of
property, plant or equipment used in the business of the Company
or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, in an aggregate principal
amount, including all Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness
incurred to refund, refinance or replace any Indebtedness
incurred pursuant to this clause (g), not to exceed
20,000,000 at
any time outstanding; |
202
|
|
|
|
(h) |
the guarantee by the Company of Indebtedness of any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries or by any Restricted Subsidiary of
Indebtedness of the Company or another Restricted Subsidiary, in
each case, that was permitted to be incurred by another
provision of this covenant; provided that if the
Indebtedness being guaranteed is subordinated in right of
payment to the Notes or a Subsidiary Guarantee then the
guarantee shall be subordinated to the same extent as the
Indebtedness guaranteed; |
|
|
(i) |
intercompany Indebtedness between or among the Company and any
of its Restricted Subsidiaries incurred in the ordinary course
of business in connection with cash pooling or other cash
management arrangements; |
|
|
(j) |
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness incurred in exchange for, or
the net proceeds of which are used to extend, refinance, renew,
replace, defease or refund Indebtedness incurred pursuant to the
first paragraph and clauses (b), (d), (g) and
(j) of the second paragraph of this covenant; |
|
|
(k) |
Indebtedness of Restricted Subsidiaries of the Company (other
than Guarantors) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
5% of the Companys Consolidated Total Assets minus the sum
of all Indebtedness of Restricted Subsidiaries of the Company
(other than Guarantors) then outstanding; and |
|
|
(l) |
any additional Indebtedness of the Company or any Guarantor in
an aggregate principal amount not in excess of
25,000,000 at
any one time outstanding and any guarantee thereof. |
The Indenture also provides that the Company will not, and will
not permit any Guarantor to, directly or indirectly, incur any
Indebtedness which by its terms (or by the terms of any
agreement governing such Indebtedness) is subordinated to any
other Indebtedness of the Company or of such Guarantor, as the
case may be, unless such Indebtedness is also by its terms (or
by the terms of any agreement governing such Indebtedness) made
expressly subordinate to the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees
of such Guarantor, as the case may be, to the same extent and in
the same manner as such Indebtedness is subordinated pursuant to
subordination provisions that are most favorable to the holders
of any other Indebtedness of the Company or of such Guarantor,
as the case may be; provided, however, that no
Indebtedness shall be deemed to be contractually subordinated in
right of payment to any other Indebtedness solely by virtue of
being unsecured.
For purposes of determining compliance with this
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified
Stock covenant, if an item of proposed Indebtedness meets
the criteria of more than one of the categories of Indebtedness
described in clauses (a) through (l) of the second
paragraph, or is entitled to be incurred pursuant to the first
paragraph, of this covenant, the Company will be permitted to
classify such item of Indebtedness on the date of its
incurrence, or later reclassify all or a portion of such item of
Indebtedness, in any manner that complies with this covenant.
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any Lien on
any property or asset now owned or hereafter acquired, or any
income or profits therefrom, except Permitted Liens, to secure
(a) any Indebtedness of the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary (if it is not also a Guarantor), unless prior to, or
contemporaneously therewith, the Notes are equally and ratably
secured, or (b) any Indebtedness of any Guarantor, unless
prior to, or contemporaneously therewith, the Subsidiary
Guarantee of such Guarantor is equally and ratably secured;
provided, however, that if such Indebtedness is expressly
subordinated to the Notes or any Subsidiary Guarantee, the Lien
securing such Indebtedness will be subordinated and junior to
the Lien securing the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantee, as the
case may be, with the same relative priority as such
Indebtedness has with respect to the Notes or the Subsidiary
Guarantee. The incurrence of secured Indebtedness by the Company
and its Restricted Subsidiaries is subject to further
limitations on the incurrence of Indebtedness as described under
the caption Incurrence of Indebtedness and
Issuance of Disqualified Stock.
203
|
|
|
Sale-and-Leaseback Transactions |
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, enter into any
sale-and-leaseback transaction; provided, however, that
the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, as applicable, may
enter into a sale-and-leaseback transaction if:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary could have
(1) incurred Indebtedness in an amount equal to the
Attributable Indebtedness relating to such sale-and-leaseback
transaction pursuant to the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio
test set forth in the first paragraph of the covenant described
above under the caption Incurrence of
Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified Stock and (2)
incurred a Lien to secure such Indebtedness pursuant to the
covenant described under the caption
Liens; |
|
|
(b) |
the gross cash proceeds of such sale-and-leaseback transaction
are at least equal to the fair market value (as determined in
accordance with the definition of such term, the results of
which determination shall be set forth in an Officers
Certificate delivered to the Trustee) of the property that is
the subject of such sale-and-leaseback transaction; and |
|
|
(c) |
the transfer of assets in such sale-and-leaseback transaction is
permitted by, and the Company applies the proceeds of such
transaction in compliance with, the covenant described above
under the caption Put Option of
Holders Asset Sales, if applicable. |
|
|
|
Issuances and Sales of Capital Stock of Restricted
Subsidiaries |
The Indenture provides that the Company (a) will not, and
will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company to,
transfer, convey, sell or otherwise dispose of any Capital Stock
of any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company to any Person other
than the Company or a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company, and (b) will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary
of the Company to issue any of its Equity Interests to any
Person other than to the Company or a Wholly Owned Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company, (except, in the case of both
clauses (a) and (b) above, as required in the manner
described in clause (b) under the definition of
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary, provided that
the business and management of the Restricted Subsidiary is,
by contract or otherwise, controlled by the Company), unless:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the Net Proceeds from such issuance, transfer, conveyance, sale
or other disposition are applied in accordance with the covenant
described above under the caption Put Option
of Holders Asset Sales and |
|
|
(b) |
immediately after giving effect to such transfer, conveyance,
sale or other disposition, such Restricted Subsidiary either
continues to be a Restricted Subsidiary or, if such Restricted
Subsidiary would no longer constitute a Restricted Subsidiary,
any remaining Investment in such Restricted Subsidiary would
have been permitted to be made under the covenant described
above under the caption Restricted
Payments if made on the date of such transfer, conveyance,
sale or other disposition. |
For purposes of this covenant, the creation or perfection of a
Lien on any Capital Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company to secure any Indebtedness of the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries will not be deemed to be a disposition
of such Capital Stock, provided that any sale by the
secured party of such Capital Stock following foreclosure of its
Lien will be subject to this covenant.
|
|
|
Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting
Subsidiaries |
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly, create or otherwise cause or suffer to exist or
become effective any consensual encumbrance or restriction on
the ability of any Restricted Subsidiary to do any of the
following:
204
|
|
|
|
(a) |
(1) pay dividends or make any other distributions to the
Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries on its Capital
Stock or (2) pay any Indebtedness owed to the Company or
any of its Restricted Subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
make loans or advances to the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries; or |
|
|
(c) |
transfer any of its properties or assets to the Company or any
of its Restricted Subsidiaries, |
except for such encumbrances or restrictions existing under or
by reason of:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
agreements governing Credit Facilities or Existing Indebtedness,
and any amendments, modifications, restatements, renewals,
increases, supplements, refundings, replacements or refinancings
thereof, provided that such agreements and amendments,
modifications, restatements, renewals, increases, supplements,
refundings, replacements or refinancings are not materially less
favorable to the holders of the Notes, taken as a whole, with
respect to such dividend and other payment restrictions, than
those contained, in the case of Credit Facilities, in agreements
governing Credit Facilities or, in the case of Existing
Indebtedness, in agreements governing such Existing
Indebtedness, in either case as in effect on the date of the
Indenture; |
|
|
(2) |
the Indenture, the Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees; |
|
|
(3) |
any agreement for the sale or other disposition of Equity
Interests in a Restricted Subsidiary that restricts
distributions by that Restricted Subsidiary pending the sale or
other disposition; |
|
|
(4) |
any instrument governing Indebtedness or Capital Stock of a
Person acquired by the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries as in effect at the time of such acquisition
(except to the extent such Indebtedness was incurred in
connection with or in contemplation of such acquisition), which
encumbrance or restriction is not applicable to any Person or
the properties or assets of any Person, other than the Person,
or the property or assets of the Person, so acquired,
provided that, in the case of Indebtedness, such
Indebtedness was permitted by the terms of the Indenture to be
incurred; |
|
|
(5) |
by reason of customary provisions restricting the subletting or
assignment of any lease or the transfer of copyrighted or
patented materials; |
|
|
(6) |
purchase money obligations for property acquired in the ordinary
course of business that impose restrictions of the nature
described in clause (c) above on the property so acquired; |
|
|
(7) |
customary provisions in agreements for the sale of property or
assets; |
|
|
(8) |
customary provisions in agreements that restrict the assignment
of such agreements or rights thereunder; |
|
|
(9) |
provisions with respect to the disposition or distribution of
assets or property in any joint venture agreement, assets sale
agreement, stock sale agreement or other similar agreement in
each case entered into in the ordinary course of business, but
in each case only to the extent such encumbrance or restriction
relates to the transfer of the property, or encumbers or
restricts the assets, subject to such agreement; |
|
|
(10) |
restrictions on cash or other deposits or net worth imposed by
customers under contracts entered into in the ordinary course of
business; |
|
|
(11) |
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness, provided that the
encumbrances and restrictions contained in the agreements
governing such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness are not
materially less favorable to the holders of the Notes, taken as
a whole, than those contained in the agreements governing the
Indebtedness being refinanced; |
205
|
|
|
|
(12) |
any Liens not prohibited by the covenant described above under
the caption Liens that limit the right
of the debtor to dispose of the assets subject to such
Liens; or |
|
|
(13) |
applicable law. |
|
|
|
Transactions with Affiliates |
The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not
permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, make any payment
to, or sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of any of its
properties or assets to, or purchase any property or assets
from, or enter into or make or amend any transaction, contract,
agreement, understanding, loan, advance or guarantee with, or
for the benefit of, any Affiliate (each of the foregoing, an
Affiliate Transaction), unless:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
such Affiliate Transaction is in writing and on terms that, when
taken as a whole, are no less favorable to the Company or the
relevant Restricted Subsidiary than those that would have been
obtained in a comparable transaction by the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary with an unrelated Person or, if there is
no such comparable transaction, on terms that are fair and
reasonable to the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary; and |
|
|
(b) |
the Company delivers to the Trustee (1) with respect to any
Affiliate Transaction or series of related Affiliate
Transactions involving aggregate consideration in excess of
2,000,000, an
Officers Certificate certifying that such Affiliate
Transaction complies with clause (a) above and
(2) with respect to any Affiliate Transaction or series of
related Affiliate Transactions involving aggregate consideration
in excess of
5,000,000, a
resolution of the Board of Directors set forth in an
Officers Certificate certifying that such Affiliate
Transaction complies with clause (a) above and that such
Affiliate Transaction has been approved by a majority of the
disinterested members of the Board of Directors and
(3) with respect to any Affiliate Transaction or series of
related Affiliate Transactions involving aggregate consideration
in excess of
15,000,000, an
opinion as to the fairness to the Company or the relevant
Subsidiary of such Affiliate Transaction from a financial point
of view issued by an accounting, appraisal or investment banking
firm that is, in the judgment of the Board of Directors,
qualified to render such opinion and is independent with respect
to the Company; |
provided, however, that the following shall be deemed not
to be Affiliate Transactions:
|
|
|
|
(A) |
any employment agreement or other employee compensation plan or
arrangement (including stock option plans) entered into by the
Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in the ordinary
course of business of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary; |
|
|
(B) |
transactions between or among the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries (including any Person that becomes a Restricted
Subsidiary as a result of any such transaction); |
|
|
(C) |
loans or advances to officers, directors and employees of the
Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries made in the
ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices
of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries in an aggregate
amount not to exceed
1,000,000
outstanding at any one time; |
|
|
(D) |
indemnities of officers, directors and employees of the Company
or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries permitted by provisions of
the organizational documents of the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary or applicable law; |
|
|
(E) |
the payment of reasonable and customary regular fees to
directors of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries
who are not employees of the Company or any Subsidiary; |
|
|
(F) |
any agreement or arrangement in effect as of the Issue Date or
any amendment thereto or replacement thereof or any transaction
contemplated thereby (including pursuant to any amendment or
replacement agreement) so long as any such amendment or
replacement agreement, taken as a whole, is no more
disadvantageous to the holders of the Notes in any material
respect than the original agreement as in effect on the Issue
Date; and |
206
|
|
|
|
(G) |
Restricted Payments and Permitted Investments that are permitted
by the provisions of the Indenture described above under the
caption Restricted Payments. |
|
|
|
Guarantees of Certain Indebtedness by Restricted
Subsidiaries |
The Indenture provides that the Company will not permit any
Restricted Subsidiary, directly or indirectly, to guarantee any
Indebtedness of the Company or any Guarantor (the Other
Company Indebtedness) other than Permitted Guarantees
unless such Restricted Subsidiary (if it is not already a
Guarantor) contemporaneously executes a Subsidiary Guarantee,
which Subsidiary Guarantee will be senior to such Restricted
Subsidiarys guarantee of such Other Company Indebtedness
if such Other Company Indebtedness so guaranteed is subordinated
Indebtedness.
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries to, engage in the conduct of any business other
than the business being conducted on the Issue Date and such
other businesses as are reasonably necessary or desirable to
facilitate the conduct and operation of, or ancillary or
reasonably related to, such businesses, except to the extent as
would not be material to the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
The Indenture provides that the Company will not and will not
permit any Guarantor to incur, directly or indirectly, any
Indebtedness that is subordinated in right of payment to any
Indebtedness of the Company or the Guarantor, as the case may
be, unless the Indebtedness so incurred is either pari passu
with, or subordinated in right of payment to, the Notes or
the relevant Subsidiary Guarantee, as the case may be.
Unsecured Indebtedness will not be deemed to be subordinated in
right of payment to secured Indebtedness solely because it is
unsecured, and Indebtedness that is not guaranteed by a
particular Person is not deemed to be subordinated in right of
payment to Indebtedness that is so guaranteed solely because it
is not so guaranteed.
Whether or not the Company is required to do so by the rules and
regulations of the Commission, the Company will file with the
Commission (unless the Commission will not accept such a filing):
|
|
|
|
(i) |
within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules
and regulations, all annual financial and other information with
respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries that would be
required to be contained in a filing with the Commission on
Form 20-F,
including a Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and a report
thereon by the Companys certified independent
accountants; and |
|
|
(ii) |
within 60 days after the end of each of the first and third
quarters of each fiscal year (and within 75 days after the
end of the second quarter of each fiscal year), reports on
Form 6-K, or any
successor form, attaching (a) unaudited consolidated
financial statements for the Company for the period then ended
(and the comparable period in the prior year), in each case
prepared in accordance with GAAP (as in effect on the date of
such report or financial information) including either, to the
extent permitted under applicable law and SEC regulations
(i) a reconciliation to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States
(U.S. GAAP) in substantially the form
set out in the
Form 20-F of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 dated on or
about May 9, 2006 or (ii) a reconciliation of EBITDA
to U.S. GAAP; provided that, in either case, such
reconciliation shall be made to U.S. GAAP as in effect on
the date of such report or financial information and
(b) the information relating to the Company described in
Item 5 of
Form 20-F (i.e.,
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects). |
Within 15 days of filing, or attempting to file, such
information with the Commission, the Company shall furnish such
information to the holders of the Notes.
207
For so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock
Exchange and the rules of such stock exchange so require, the
above information will also be made available in Luxembourg,
free of charge, through the offices of the Paying Agent in
Luxembourg.
|
|
|
Future Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted
Subsidiaries |
The preceding covenants (including calculation of financial
ratios and the determination of limitations on the incurrence of
Indebtedness) may be affected by the designation by the Company
of any existing or future Subsidiary of the Company as an
Unrestricted Subsidiary, or by the redesignation by the Company
of an Unrestricted Subsidiary as a Restricted Subsidiary.
The Board of Directors may designate any Restricted Subsidiary
to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary if such designation would not
cause a Default. For purposes of making such designation, all
outstanding Investments by the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries in the Subsidiary so designated will be deemed to
be Restricted Payments at the time of such designation, in an
amount equal to the fair market value of such Investments at the
time of such designation. Such designation will only be
permitted if such Restricted Payments would be permitted by the
terms of the Indenture at such time and if such Restricted
Subsidiary otherwise meets the definition of Unrestricted
Subsidiary. The Company may not designate any Restricted
Subsidiary to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary at any time during
which the Company maintains Investment Grade Status.
The Board of Directors may also redesignate any Unrestricted
Subsidiary to be a Restricted Subsidiary if such redesignation
complies with the requirements of the Indenture described in the
definition of Unrestricted Subsidiary. If the
aggregate amount of all Restricted Payments calculated for
purposes of the first paragraph of the covenant described under
the caption Restricted Payments above
includes an Investment in an Unrestricted Subsidiary that
subsequently becomes a Restricted Subsidiary pursuant to the
terms of this paragraph, then the aggregate amount of such
Restricted Payments will be reduced by the lesser of (a) an
amount equal to the fair market value of the Investments
previously made by the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries
in such Unrestricted Subsidiary at the time it becomes a
Restricted Subsidiary and (b) the amount of such
Investments.
Any designation or redesignation pursuant to this covenant by
the Board of Directors will be evidenced by the filing with the
Trustee of a Board Resolution giving effect to such action and
evidencing the valuation of any Investment relating thereto (as
determined in good faith by the Board of Directors) and an
Officers Certificate certifying that such action and
valuation complied with the preceding requirements.
Effectiveness of Covenants and Events of Default
The covenants described under clauses (c) and
(d) under Subsidiary
Guarantees Merger or Consolidation,
Certain Covenants Restricted
Payments, Certain Covenants
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified
Stock, Certain Covenants
Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting
Subsidiaries, Certain
Covenants Transactions with Affiliates,
Certain Covenants Conduct of
Business, Put Option of
Holders Asset Sales, clauses (a)(1),
(b) and (c) under Certain
Covenants Sale-and-Leaseback Transactions, and
Certain Covenants Issuances and
Sales of Capital Stock of Restricted Subsidiaries and the
Events of Default described under clauses (e) and (f)(4)
under Events of Default and Remedies
(collectively, the Suspended Provisions) will
no longer be in effect upon the Company attaining Investment
Grade Status. If at any time the Companys credit rating is
downgraded from Investment Grade Status, then the Suspended
Provisions will thereafter be reinstated as if such covenants
had never been suspended and be applicable pursuant to the terms
of the Indenture (including in connection with performing any
calculation or assessment to determine compliance with the terms
of the Indenture), unless and until the Company subsequently
attains Investment Grade Status (in which event the Suspended
Provisions shall again no longer be in effect for such time that
the Company maintains Investment Grade Status); provided,
however, that no Default, Event of Default or breach of any
kind shall be deemed to exist under the Indenture with respect
to the Suspended Provisions based on, and none of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries shall bear any liability for, any
actions taken or events occurring after the Company attains
Investment Grade Status and before any reinstatement of such
Suspended Provisions as provided above, or any actions taken at
any time
208
pursuant to any contractual obligation arising prior to such
reinstatement, regardless of whether such actions or events
would have been permitted if the applicable Suspended Provisions
remained in effect during such period. There can be no assurance
that the Notes will ever achieve Investment Grade Status or that
any such rating, if achieved, will be maintained.
Events of Default and Remedies
The Indenture provides that each of the following constitutes an
Event of Default:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
default for 30 days in the payment when due of interest, on
the Notes; |
|
|
(b) |
default in payment when due of the principal of or premium, if
any, on the Notes; |
|
|
(c) |
failure by the Company to comply with the provisions described
under the caption Put Option of Holders; |
|
|
(d) |
failure by the Company for 30 days after it receives
written notice from the Trustee or at least 25% in principal
amount of the then outstanding Notes to comply with any of its
other agreements in the Indenture or the Notes; |
|
|
(e) |
the declaration or payment of any dividend or the making of any
other payment or distribution described in
subclause (y) of clause (3) under the caption
Certain Covenants Restricted
Payments, which declaration, payment or distribution would
not be permitted by the provisions described under the caption
Certain Covenants Restricted
Payments if it were treated as a Restricted Payment; |
|
|
(f) |
the Company consolidates or merges (fusion) with or into
(whether or not the Company is the surviving corporation), or
sells, assigns, transfers, leases, conveys, demerges
(scission) or otherwise disposes of all or substantially
all of its properties or assets in one or more related
transactions, to another Person unless: |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
the Company is the surviving corporation or the Person formed by
or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than the
Company) or to which such sale, assignment, transfer, lease,
conveyance, demerger or other disposition shall have been made
is a corporation organized or existing under the laws of the
United States (or any state thereof or the District of
Columbia), the Republic of France or any other member state of
the European Union (as constituted on the Issue Date); |
|
|
(2) |
the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or
merger (if other than the Company) or the Person to which such
sale, assignment, transfer, lease, conveyance, demerger or other
disposition shall have been made assumes all the obligations of
the Company under the Notes and the Indenture pursuant to a
supplemental indenture in a form reasonably satisfactory to the
Trustee; |
|
|
(3) |
immediately after such transaction no Default or Event of
Default exists; |
|
|
(4) |
except in the case of a merger of the Company with or into a
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, the Company
or the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or
merger (if other than the Company), or to which such sale,
assignment, transfer, lease, conveyance, demerger or other
disposition shall have been made: |
|
|
|
|
(A) |
will have a Consolidated Net Worth immediately after the
transaction equal to or greater than the Consolidated Net Worth
of the Company immediately preceding the transaction; and |
|
|
(B) |
will, at the time of such transaction and after giving pro
forma effect thereto as if such transaction had occurred at
the beginning of the applicable four-quarter period, be
permitted to incur at least
1.00 of
additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio test set forth in the first paragraph of the
covenant described |
209
|
|
|
|
|
above under the caption Certain
Covenants Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock; and |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
the Company shall deliver to the Trustee an Officers
Certificate and an opinion of counsel stating that such
consolidation, merger or disposition and any supplemental
indenture in respect thereto comply with this provision and that
all conditions precedent in the Indenture relating to such
transaction or transactions have been complied with; |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
default under any mortgage, indenture or instrument under which
there may be issued or by which there may be secured or
evidenced any Indebtedness for money borrowed by the Company or
any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (or the payment of which is
guaranteed by the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries), whether such Indebtedness or guarantee exists on
the date of the Indenture or is created after the date of the
Indenture, which default (1) is caused by a failure to pay
principal of or premium or interest on such Indebtedness prior
to the expiration of any grace period provided in such
Indebtedness, including any extension thereof (a
Payment Default), or (2) results in the
acceleration of such Indebtedness prior to its express maturity
and, in each case, the principal amount of any such
Indebtedness, together with the principal amount of any other
such Indebtedness under which there has been a Payment Default
or the maturity of which has been so accelerated, aggregates in
excess of
10,000,000 and
provided, further, that if any such default is cured or
waived or any such acceleration rescinded, or such Indebtedness
is repaid, within a period of 10 days from the continuation
of such default beyond the applicable grace period or the
occurrence of such acceleration, as the case may be, such Event
of Default and any consequential acceleration of the Notes shall
be automatically rescinded, so long as such rescission does not
conflict with any judgment or decree; |
|
|
(h) |
failure by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to
pay final judgments (not covered by insurance) aggregating in
excess of
10,000,000,
which judgments are not paid, discharged or stayed for a period
of 60 days; |
|
|
(i) |
failure by any Guarantor to perform any covenant set forth in
its Subsidiary Guarantee, or the repudiation by any Guarantor of
its obligations under its Subsidiary Guarantee or the
unenforceability of any Subsidiary Guarantee for any reason
other than as provided in the Indenture; and |
|
|
(j) |
certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to the
Company or any Significant Subsidiary. |
If any Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee or
the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then
outstanding Notes may declare all the Notes to be due and
payable immediately. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case
of an Event of Default arising from certain events of bankruptcy
or insolvency with respect to the Company or any Significant
Subsidiary, all outstanding Notes will become due and payable
without further action or notice. The holders of a majority in
principal amount of the then outstanding Notes by written notice
to the Trustee may on behalf of all of the holders rescind an
acceleration and its consequences if the rescission would not
conflict with any judgment or decree and if all existing Events
of Default (except non-payment of principal, interest or premium
that have become due solely because of such acceleration) have
been cured or waived. Holders of the Notes may not enforce the
Indenture or the Notes except as provided in the Indenture.
Subject to certain limitations, holders of a majority in
principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may direct the
Trustee in its exercise of any trust or power. The Trustee may
withhold from holders of the Notes notice of any continuing
Default or Event of Default (except a Default or Event of
Default relating to the payment of principal or interest) if it
determines that withholding notice is in their interest.
In the case of any Event of Default occurring by reason of any
willful action (or inaction) taken (or not taken) by or on
behalf of the Company with the intention of avoiding payment of
the premium that the Company would have had to pay if the
Company then had elected to redeem the Notes pursuant to the
optional redemption provisions of the Indenture, an equivalent
premium shall also become and be immediately due and payable to
the extent permitted by law upon the acceleration of the Notes.
The holders of a majority in principal amount of the Notes then
outstanding by notice to the Trustee may on behalf of the
holders of all of the Notes waive any existing Default or Event
of Default and its consequences
210
under the Indenture except a continuing Default or Event of
Default in the payment of the principal of or interest on the
Notes.
The Company will be required to deliver to the Trustee annually
a statement regarding compliance with the Indenture, and the
Company will be required, upon becoming aware of any Default or
Event of Default, to deliver to the Trustee a statement
specifying such Default or Event of Default.
No Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees and
Stockholders
No director, officer, employee, incorporator, member, partner or
stockholder or other owner of Capital Stock of the Company or
any Guarantor, as such, shall have any liability for any
obligations of the Company or any Guarantor under the Notes, the
Subsidiary Guarantees or the Indenture or for any claim based
on, in respect of, or by reason of, such obligations or their
creation. Each holder of the Notes by accepting a Note waives
and releases all such liability. The waiver and release are part
of the consideration for issuance of the Notes. Such waiver may
not be effective to waive liabilities under the federal
securities laws, and it is the view of the Commission that such
a waiver is against public policy.
Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance
The Company may, at its option and at any time, elect to have
all of the obligations of itself and the Guarantors discharged
with respect to the outstanding Notes and the Subsidiary
Guarantees, respectively (Legal Defeasance),
except for:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the rights of holders of outstanding Notes to receive payments
in respect of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest
on such Notes when such payments are due from the trust referred
to below; |
|
|
(b) |
the Companys obligations with respect to the Notes
concerning issuing temporary Notes, registration of transfer or
exchange of the Notes, mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen
Notes and the maintenance of an office or agency for payment and
money for security payments held in trust; |
|
|
(c) |
the rights, powers, trusts, duties and immunities of the
Trustee, and the Companys and any Guarantors
obligations in connection with them; and |
|
|
(d) |
the Legal Defeasance provisions of the Indenture. |
In addition, the Company may, at its option and at any time,
elect to have the obligations of the Company and any Guarantor
released with respect to certain covenants that are described in
the Indenture (Covenant Defeasance), and
thereafter any omission to comply with such obligations shall
not constitute a Default or Event of Default with respect to the
Notes. If Covenant Defeasance occurs, certain other events (not
including non-payment, bankruptcy, receivership, rehabilitation
and insolvency events) described under the caption
Events of Default and Remedies will no
longer constitute an Event of Default with respect to the Notes.
In order to exercise either Legal Defeasance or Covenant
Defeasance:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
the Company must irrevocably deposit with the Trustee, in trust,
for the benefit of the holders of the Notes, cash in
U.S. dollars, non-callable U.S. Government Securities,
or a combination thereof, in such amounts as will be sufficient,
in the opinion of an internationally recognized firm of
independent public accountants, to pay the principal of and
premium and interest on the outstanding Notes on the Stated
Maturity or on the applicable redemption date, as the case may
be, and the Company must specify whether the Notes are being
defeased to maturity or to a particular redemption date; |
|
|
(2) |
in the case of Legal Defeasance, the Company shall have
delivered to the Trustee an opinion of counsel reasonably
acceptable to the Trustee confirming that (A) the Company
has received from, or there has been published by, the Internal
Revenue Service and the French tax authority a ruling or
(B) since the date of the Indenture, there has been a
change in the applicable income tax law, in either case to the
effect that, and based thereon such opinion of counsel shall
confirm that, the holders of the outstanding Notes will not
recognize income, gain or loss for U.S. federal or French
income tax |
211
|
|
|
|
|
purposes, respectively, as a result of such Legal Defeasance and
will be subject to U.S. federal or French income tax on the
same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would
have been the case if such Legal Defeasance had not occurred; |
|
|
(3) |
in the case of Covenant Defeasance, the Company shall have
delivered to the Trustee an opinion of counsel reasonably
acceptable to the Trustee confirming that the holders of the
outstanding Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for
U.S. federal or French income tax purposes as a result of
such Covenant Defeasance and will be subject to
U.S. federal or French income tax on the same amounts, in
the same manner and at the same times as would have been the
case if such Covenant Defeasance had not occurred; |
|
|
(4) |
no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing either (A) on the date of such deposit (other
than a Default or Event of Default resulting from the borrowing
of funds to be applied to such deposit) or (B) insofar as
Events of Default from bankruptcy or insolvency events are
concerned, at any time in the period ending on the
550th day after the date of deposit; |
|
|
(5) |
such Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance will not result in
a breach or violation of, or constitute a default under any
material agreement or instrument (other than the Indenture) to
which the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries is a
party or by which the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries is bound; |
|
|
(6) |
the Company must have delivered to the Trustee an opinion of
counsel to the effect that, after the 550th day following
the deposit, the trust funds will not be subject to the effect
of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or
similar laws affecting creditors rights generally; |
|
|
(7) |
the Company must deliver to the Trustee an Officers
Certificate stating that the deposit was not made by the Company
with the intent of preferring the holders of the Notes over the
other creditors of the Company or with the intent of defeating,
hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors of the Company or
others; and |
|
|
(8) |
the Company must deliver to the Trustee an Officers
Certificate and an opinion of counsel, each stating that all
conditions precedent provided for relating to the Legal
Defeasance or the Covenant Defeasance have been complied with. |
Transfer and Exchange
A holder of the Notes may transfer or exchange the Notes in
accordance with the Indenture. The Registrar and the Trustee may
require a holder, among other things, to furnish appropriate
endorsements and transfer documents and the Company may require
a holder to pay any taxes and fees required by law or permitted
by the Indenture. The Company will not be required to transfer
or exchange any Note selected for redemption. Also, the Company
will not be required to transfer or exchange any Note for a
period of 15 days before a selection of Notes to be
redeemed.
The registered holder of a Note will be treated as the owner of
it for all purposes, and all references to holders
in this Description of the Notes are to registered
holders unless otherwise indicated.
Amendment and Waiver
Except as provided below, the Indenture or the Notes may be
amended or supplemented with the consent of the holders of at
least a majority in principal amount of the Notes then
outstanding (including, without limitation, consents obtained in
connection with a purchase of, or tender offer or exchange offer
for, the Notes), and any existing default or compliance with any
provision of the Indenture or the Notes may be waived with the
consent of the holders of a majority in principal amount of the
then outstanding Notes (including, without limitation, consents
obtained in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer for
the Notes).
212
Without the consent of each holder affected, an amendment,
supplement or waiver may not (with respect to any Notes held by
a non-consenting holder):
|
|
|
|
(a) |
reduce the principal amount of the Notes whose holders must
consent to an amendment, supplement or waiver; |
|
|
(b) |
reduce the principal of or change the fixed maturity of any Note
or alter the provisions with respect to the redemption or
purchase of the Notes by the Company; |
|
|
(c) |
reduce the rate of or change the time for payment of interest on
any Note; |
|
|
(d) |
waive a Default or Event of Default in the payment of principal
of or premium or interest on the Notes (except a rescission of
acceleration of the Notes by the holders of at least a majority
in principal amount of the Notes and a waiver of the payment
default that resulted from such acceleration); |
|
|
(e) |
make any Note payable in money other than that stated in the
Notes; |
|
|
(f) |
make any change in the provisions of the Indenture relating to
waivers of past defaults or the rights of holders of the Notes
to receive payments of principal of or premium or interest on
the Notes; |
|
|
(g) |
waive a redemption or repurchase payment with respect to any
Note; |
|
|
(h) |
make any change in the ranking of the Notes relative to other
Indebtedness of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantees
relative to other Indebtedness of the Guarantors, in either case
in a manner adverse to the holders; |
|
|
(i) |
release any Guarantor from any of its obligations under its
Subsidiary Guarantee or the Indenture, except in accordance with
the terms of the Indenture; |
|
|
(j) |
make any change in the provisions described under the caption
Additional Amounts in a manner adverse
to the holders; or |
|
|
(k) |
make any change in the preceding amendment, supplement and
waiver provisions. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, without the consent of any holder
of the Notes, the Company, the Guarantors and the Trustee may
amend or supplement the Indenture or the Notes to cure any
ambiguity, defect or inconsistency, to provide for
uncertificated Notes in addition to or in place of certificated
Notes, to provide for the assumption of the Companys
obligations to holders of the Notes in the case of a merger or
consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the
Companys properties or assets, to make any change that
would provide any additional rights or benefits to the holders
of the Notes or that does not materially adversely affect the
legal rights under the Indenture of any such holder, to secure
the Notes pursuant to the requirements of the covenant described
above under the caption Certain
Covenants Liens, to add any Guarantor or to
release any Guarantor from its Subsidiary Guarantee, in each
case as provided in the Indenture, or to comply with
requirements of the Commission in order to effect or maintain
the qualification of the Indenture under the Trust Indenture Act.
Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries shall, directly
or indirectly, pay or cause to be paid any consideration,
whether by way of interest, fee or otherwise, to any holder of
any Notes for or as an inducement to any consent, waiver,
amendment or supplement of any terms or provisions of the
Indenture or the Notes, unless such consideration is offered to
be paid or agreed to be paid to all holders of the Notes which
so consent, waive or agree to amend or supplement in the time
frame set forth in solicitation documents relating to such
consent, waiver or agreement.
213
Satisfaction and Discharge
The Indenture will be discharged and will cease to be of further
effect as to all Notes issued thereunder, when:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
all Notes that have been authenticated (except lost, stolen or
destroyed Notes that have been replaced or paid and Notes for
whose payment money has theretofore been deposited in trust and
thereafter repaid to the Company) have been delivered to the
Trustee for cancellation; or |
|
|
(b) |
all Notes that have not been delivered to the Trustee for
cancellation have become due and payable by reason of the giving
of a notice of redemption or otherwise or will become due and
payable within one year and the Company or any Guarantor has
irrevocably deposited or caused to be irrevocably deposited with
the Trustee as trust funds in trust solely for the benefit of
the holders of the Notes, cash in U.S. dollars,
non-callable U.S. Government Securities, or a combination
thereof, in such amounts as will be sufficient without
consideration of any reinvestment of interest, to pay and
discharge the entire indebtedness on the Notes not previously
delivered to the Trustee for cancellation, including principal,
premium, if any, and accrued interest to the date of maturity or
redemption; |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing on the date of such deposit or shall occur as a
result of such deposit and such deposit will not result in a
breach or violation of, or constitute a default under, any other
instrument to which the Company or any Guarantor is a party or
by which the Company or any Guarantor is bound; |
|
|
(3) |
the Company and each Guarantor has paid or caused to be paid all
other sums payable by it under the Indenture; and |
|
|
(4) |
the Company has delivered an Officers Certificate and an
opinion of counsel to the Trustee stating that all conditions
precedent to satisfaction and discharge have been satisfied. |
The Trustee
The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association serves
as trustee under the Indenture.
The Indenture contains certain limitations on the rights of the
Trustee, should it become a creditor of the Company or any
Guarantor, to obtain payment of claims in certain cases, or to
realize on certain property received in respect of any such
claim as security or otherwise. The Trustee will be permitted to
engage in other transactions; however, if it acquires any
conflicting interest and a Default occurs it must eliminate such
conflict within 90 days, apply to the Commission for
permission to continue as Trustee or resign.
The holders of a majority in principal amount of the then
outstanding Notes will have the right to direct the time, method
and place of conducting any proceeding for exercising any remedy
available to the Trustee, subject to certain exceptions. The
Indenture provides that in case an Event of Default shall occur
(that is not cured), the Trustee will be required, in the
exercise of its power, to use the degree of care of a prudent
man in the conduct of his own affairs. Subject to such
provisions, the Trustee will be under no obligation to exercise
any of its rights or powers under the Indenture at the request
of any holder of Notes, unless such holder has offered to the
Trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to it against any
loss, liability or expense.
Governing Law
The Indenture, the Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees will be
governed by the laws of the State of New York.
Consent to Jurisdiction
The Indenture provides that any suit, action or proceeding with
respect to the Indenture, the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees
may be brought in any New York state or federal court located in
the Borough of
214
Manhattan in the City of New York (New York
Court) and that the Company and the Guarantors will
submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of such courts.
Enforceability of Judgments; Indemnification for Foreign
Currency Judgments
A significant portion of the assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries is outside the United States, so any judgment
obtained in the United States against the Company or any
Guarantor, including judgments relating to payments with respect
to the Notes, may not be fully collectible within the United
States.
The Company has been informed by its French counsel that a final
judgment for a sum of money in relation to the Indenture or the
Notes obtained in any New York Court would be recognized and
enforceable by the French courts without re-examination or
re-litigation of the matters adjudicated, through an action for
exequatur brought before the competent French court
provided that the court is satisfied that the
requirements developed by case law for the enforcement of
foreign judgments in France are met, and in particular provided
that:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the judgment concerned is enforceable in the State of New York; |
|
|
(b) |
such judgment has been rendered by a court having jurisdiction
over the parties both under its own rules of jurisdiction and in
accordance with French rules of international conflicts of
jurisdiction and the French courts did not have exclusive
jurisdiction to hear the matter; |
|
|
(c) |
the court that rendered such judgment has applied to the merits
of the case the laws of the jurisdiction which would have been
considered appropriate under French rules of international
conflicts of laws; |
|
|
(d) |
the judgment is not contrary to French international public
policy (ordre public international), both pertaining to
the merits and to the procedure of the case; |
|
|
(e) |
the judgment is not tainted with fraud; and |
|
|
(f) |
the judgment does not conflict with a French judgment or a
foreign judgment which has become effective in France and there
is no risk of conflict with proceedings pending before the
French courts at the time enforcement of the judgment is sought. |
The Indenture also provides that obligations of the Company to
any holder of the Notes or the Trustee shall, notwithstanding
any judgment in a currency (the Judgment
Currency) other than United States dollars (the
Agreement Currency), be discharged only to
the extent that on the day following receipt by such holder of
the Notes or the Trustee, as the case may be, of any amount in
the Judgment Currency, such holder of the Notes or the Trustee
may in accordance with normal banking procedures purchase the
Agreement Currency with the Judgment Currency. If the amount of
the Agreement Currency so purchased is less than the amount
originally to be paid to such holder of the Notes or the
Trustee, as the case may be, in the Agreement Currency, the
Company agrees, as a separate obligation and notwithstanding
such judgment, to pay to such holder of Notes or the Trustee, as
the case may be, the difference, and if the amount of the
Agreement Currency so purchased exceeds the amount originally to
be paid to such holder of the Notes or the Trustee, as the case
may be, such holder of the Notes or the Trustee, as the case may
be, agrees to pay to or for the account of the Company such
excess, provided that such holder of the Notes or the Trustee,
as the case may be, shall not have any obligation to pay any
such excess as long as a default by the Company or any Guarantor
in its obligations under the Notes, the Indenture or the
Subsidiary Guarantees has occurred and is continuing, in which
case such excess may be applied by such holder of the Notes or
the Trustee, as the case may be, to such obligations.
Additional Information
Anyone who receives this prospectus may obtain a copy of the
Indenture without charge by contacting Compagnie
Générale de Géophysique-Veritas, Tour Maine
Montparnasse, 33 avenue de Maine, BP 191, 75755 Paris
CEDEX 15, France, Attention: Investor Relations Officer,
Telephone (33) 1 64 47 45 00.
215
Book Entry, Delivery and Form
The New Notes will initially be represented by a note in global
form that will represent the aggregate principal amount of the
New Notes (the Global Note). When issued, the
Global Note will be deposited with the Trustee and registered in
the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee for The
Depository Trust Company (DTC) nominee.
Except as set forth below, record ownership of the Global Note
may be transferred, in whole or in part, only to another nominee
of DTC or to a successor of DTC or its nominee.
The New Notes will be issued only in registered form and in
minimum denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples of $1,000
in excess thereof. The New Notes will be issued on the Issue
Date only against payment in immediately available funds.
Investors may hold their interests in the Global Note directly
through DTC if they are DTC participants (the
Participants) or indirectly through
organizations that are DTC participants (the Indirect
Participants).
Investors may also hold their interests in the Global Note
directly through Euroclear Bank S.A./ N.V/, as operator of the
Euroclear System or Clearstream Banking
(Euroclear), if they are participants in
these systems, or indirectly through organizations that are
participants in these systems.
So long as Cede & Co., as the nominee of DTC, is the
registered owner of the Global Note, Cede & Co. for all
purposes (except with respect to the determination of Additional
Amounts payable) will be considered the sole holder of the
Global Note. Owners of beneficial interests in the Global Note
will be entitled to have certificates registered in their names
and to receive physical delivery of Notes only in the limited
circumstances described below under the caption
Depository Procedures Exchange of
Global Notes for Definitive Notes.
Depository Procedures
The following description of the operations and procedures of
DTC, Euroclear Euroclear and Clearstream Banking is provided
solely as a matter of convenience. These operations and
procedures are solely within the control of the respective
settlement systems and are subject to changes by them from time
to time. The Company takes no responsibility for these
operations and procedures and urges investors to contact the
systems or their participants directly to discuss these matters.
Upon deposit of the Global Note, DTC will credit the accounts of
Participants designated by the underwriters with portions of the
principal amount of the Global Note.
Payment of principal of and premium and interest on the Global
Note will be made to Cede & Co., the nominee for DTC,
as registered owner of the Global Note, by wire transfer of
immediately available funds on the applicable payment date.
Neither the Company nor the Trustee, nor any agent of either of
them, will have any responsibility or liability for any aspect
of the records relating to or payments made on account of
beneficial ownership interests in the Global Note or for
maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to
such beneficial ownership interest.
The Company has been informed by DTC that, with respect to any
payment of principal of, or premium or interest on, the Global
Note, DTCs practice is to credit accounts of Participants
on the applicable payment date, with payments in amounts
proportionate to their respective beneficial interests in the
Notes represented by the Global Note as shown on the records of
DTC, unless DTC has reason to believe that it will not receive
payment on such payment date. Payments by Participants to owners
of beneficial interests in the Notes represented by the Global
Note held through such Participants will be the responsibility
of such Participants, as is now the case with securities held
for the accounts of customers registered in street
name. In particular, payments to owners of beneficial
interests in the Notes held through Euroclear and Clearstream
Banking will be made in accordance with the rules and operating
procedures of Euroclear and Clearstream Banking.
Transfers between Participants will be effected in the ordinary
way in accordance with DTCs rules and will be settled in
immediately available funds. Participants in Euroclear and
Clearstream Banking will effect transfers with other
participants in the ordinary way in accordance with the rules
and operating procedures of Euroclear and Clearstream Banking,
as applicable. The laws of some states require that certain
persons take physical delivery in definitive form of securities
that they own. Consequently, the ability to transfer beneficial
interests in
216
the Global Note to such persons will be limited to that extent.
Because DTC can act only on behalf of Participants, which in
turn act on behalf of Indirect Participants and certain banks,
the ability of a person having beneficial interests in the
Global Note to pledge such interests to persons or entities that
do not participate in the DTC system, or otherwise take actions
in respect of such interests, may be affected by the lack of a
physical certificate evidencing such interests.
Cross-market transfers between DTC Participants, on the one
hand, and directly or indirectly through Euroclear or
Clearstream Banking participants, on the other, will be effected
in DTC in accordance with DTC rules on behalf of Euroclear
or Clearstream Banking, as the case may be, by its respective
depositary; however, these cross-market transactions will
require delivery of instructions to Euroclear or Clearstream
Banking, as the case may be, by the counterparty in the system
in accordance with its rules and procedures and within its
established deadlines (Brussels time). Euroclear or Clearstream
Banking, as the case may be, will, if the transaction meets its
settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its depositary
to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by
delivering or receiving interests in the relevant Global Note in
DTC, and making or receiving payment in accordance with normal
procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC.
Euroclear participants and Clearstream Banking participants may
not deliver instructions directly to the depositaries for
Euroclear or Clearstream Banking.
Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a
Euroclear or Clearstream Banking participant purchasing an
interest in the Global Note from a DTC Participant will be
credited during the securities settlement processing day (which
must be a business day for Euroclear or Clearstream Banking, as
the case may be) immediately following the DTC settlement date,
and the credit of any transactions interests in the Global
Note settled during the processing day will be reported to the
relevant Euroclear or Clearstream Banking participant on that
day. Cash received in Euroclear or Clearstream Banking as a
result of sales of interests in the Global Note by or through a
Euroclear or Clearstream Banking participant to a DTC
Participant will be received with value on the DTC settlement
date, but will be available in the relevant Euroclear or
Clearstream Banking cash account only as of the business day
following settlement in DTC.
Neither the Company nor the Trustee, nor any agent of either of
them, will have responsibility for the performance of DTC,
Euroclear, Clearstream Banking or their respective participants
of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures
governing their operations. DTC has advised the Company that it
will take any action permitted to be taken by a holder of the
Notes (including, without limitation, the presentation of the
Notes for exchange as described below) only at the direction of
one or more Participants to whose accounts with DTC interests in
the Global Note are credited, and only in respect of the Notes
represented by the Global Note as to which such Participant or
Participants has or have given such direction. However, if there
is an Event of Default under the Notes, DTC reserves the right
to exchange the Global Note for Notes in definitive form, which
it will distribute to its Participants.
DTC has also advised the Company that DTC is a limited purpose
trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York,
a member of the Federal Reserve System, a clearing
corporation within the meaning of the Uniform Commercial
Code and a clearing agency registered pursuant to
the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC was
created to hold securities for its Participants and to
facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities
transactions between Participants through electronic book-entry
changes to accounts of its Participants, thereby eliminating the
need for physical movement of certificates. Participants include
securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and
clearing corporations and may include certain other
organizations such as the underwriters. Certain of such
Participants (or their representatives), together with other
entities, own DTC. Indirect access to the DTC system is
available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust
companies that clear through, or maintain a custodial
relationship with, a Participant, either directly or indirectly.
|
|
|
Exchange of Global Notes for Definitive Notes |
The Global Note is exchangeable for Notes in registered
definitive form (Definitive Notes) if:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
DTC notifies the Company that it is unwilling or unable to
continue as depositary for the Global Notes or has ceased to be
a clearing agency registered under the Exchange Act and, in
either case, the |
217
|
|
|
|
|
Company thereupon fails to appoint a successor depositary within
90 days after the date of such notice; |
|
|
(b) |
the Company, at its option, notifies the Trustee in writing that
it elects to cause the issuance of Definitive Notes; or |
|
|
(c) |
there has occurred and is continuing an Event of Default with
respect to the Notes. |
In all cases, Definitive Notes delivered in exchange for any
Global Note or beneficial interests therein will be registered
in the names, and issued in any approved denominations,
requested by or on behalf of DTC (in accordance with its
customary procedures).
|
|
|
Exchange of Definitive Notes for Global Notes |
If issued, Definitive Notes may not be exchanged or transferred
for beneficial interests in the Global Note.
|
|
|
Exchange of Definitive Notes for Definitive Notes |
If issued, Definitive Notes may be exchanged or transferred by
presenting or surrendering such Definitive Notes at the office
of the Registrar located in Dallas, Texas or Luxembourg with a
written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to such
Registrar, duly executed by the holder of the Definitive Notes
or by its attorney, duly authorized in writing.
|
|
|
Same-Day Settlement and Payment |
The Notes represented by the Global Note will be eligible to
trade in DTCs Same Day Funds Settlement System, and any
permitted secondary market trading activity in such Note will,
therefore, be required by DTC to be settled in immediately
available funds. The Company expects that secondary trading in
any Definitive Notes would also be settled in immediately
available funds.
Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a
Euroclear or Clearstream Banking participant purchasing an
interest in the Global Note from a Participant in DTC will be
credited, and any such crediting will be reported to the
relevant Euroclear or Clearstream Banking participant, during
the securities settlement processing day (which must be a
business day for Euroclear and Clearstream Banking) immediately
following the settlement date of DTC.
DTC has advised the Company that cash received in Euroclear or
Clearstream Banking as a result of sales of interests in the
Global Note by or through a Euroclear or Clearstream Banking
participant to a Participant in DTC will be received with value
on the settlement date of DTC but will be available in the
relevant Euroclear or Clearstream Banking cash account only as
of the business day for Euroclear or Clearstream Banking
following DTCs settlement date.
Replacement, Transfer and Exchange
If any Note at any time is mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost,
such Note may be replaced at the cost of the applicant at the
office of the Trustee or the office of the Registrar in
Luxembourg. The applicant for a new Note must, in the case of
any mutilated Note, surrender such Note to the Trustee or the
Registrar in Luxembourg, as applicable, and, in the case of any
lost, destroyed or stolen Note, furnish evidence satisfactory to
the Trustee or the Registrar in Luxembourg, as applicable, of
such loss, destruction or theft, together with such indemnity as
the Trustee or the Registrar in Luxembourg, as applicable, and
the Company may require.
Initially, the Trustee will act as Registrar in the continental
United States, and Notes may be presented for registration of
transfer and exchange at the office of the Trustee in Dallas,
Texas. Dexia Banque Internationale à Luxembourg,
société anonyme will act initially as Registrar in
Luxembourg, and Notes may be presented for registration of
transfer and exchange at its office at 69, route dEsch,
2953 Luxembourg.
A holder may transfer or exchange Notes in accordance with the
Indenture. The Registrar and the Trustee may require a holder,
among other things, to furnish appropriate endorsements and
transfer documents and the
218
Company may require a holder to pay any transfer tax or similar
governmental charge required by law. The Company and the
Registrar are not required to transfer or exchange any Note
selected for redemption. Also, the Company and the Registrar are
not required to transfer or exchange any Note for a period of
15 days before a selection of Notes to be redeemed.
Purchase
The Company, the Trustee and their respective Affiliates may at
any time and from time to time purchase any Note or a beneficial
interest in any Note in the open market or otherwise at any
price.
Notices
Any notice to Noteholders will be mailed by first class mail or
delivered by overnight air courier guaranteeing next day
delivery, in each case to their respective registered addresses
shown on the register kept by the Registrar. In addition, for so
long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange
and its rules so require, any such notice (including notices of
redemption) will be published in a newspaper having general
circulation in Luxembourg, which is expected to be
DWort, or if such newspaper ceases to be published
or timely publication in it will not be practicable, in such
other newspaper as the Trustee deems necessary to give fair and
reasonable notice to the Noteholders. Notices may also be
published on the internet site of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange
at www.bourse.lu. Also for so long as the Notes are listed on
the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, the Company will provide to the
exchange a copy of all notices to Noteholders.
Listing
Application has been made to list the Notes on the Euro MTF
market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
Certain Definitions
Set forth below are certain defined terms used in the Indenture.
Reference is made to the Indenture for a full disclosure of all
such terms, as well as any other capitalized terms used herein
for which no definition is provided.
Acquired Indebtedness means with respect to a
specified Person (a) Indebtedness of any other Person
existing at the time such other Person is merged with or into or
becomes a Subsidiary of such specified Person or
(b) Indebtedness relating to properties or assets acquired
by such specified Person. Acquired Indebtedness shall be deemed
to be incurred on the date the acquired Person becomes a
Restricted Subsidiary or the date of the related acquisition of
properties or assets from such Person.
Affiliate of any specified Person means any
other Person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by
or under direct or indirect common control with such specified
Person. For purposes of the Indenture, control, as
used with respect to any Person, means the possession, directly
or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of
the management or policies of such Person, whether through the
ownership of Voting Stock, by agreement or otherwise;
provided, however, that beneficial ownership of 10% or
more of the Voting Stock of a Person shall be deemed to be
control. For purposes of the Indenture, the terms
controlling, controlled by and
under common control with have correlative meanings.
Applicable Premium means, with respect to any
Note on any redemption date, the greater of:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
1.0% of the principal amount of the Note; and |
|
|
(b) |
the excess of (1) the present value at such redemption date
of (A) the redemption price of the Note at May 15, 2012
(such redemption price being set forth in the table appearing
above under the caption Optional
Redemption) plus (B) all required interest payments
due on the Note during the period from such redemption date
through May 15, 2012 (excluding accrued but unpaid
interest), computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury
Rate as of such redemption date plus 50 basis points over
(2) the principal amount of the Note, if greater. |
219
Asset Sale means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the sale, lease, conveyance or other disposition (a
disposition) of any properties or assets
(including, without limitation, by way of a sale-and-leaseback),
excluding dispositions in the ordinary course of business
(provided that the disposition of all or substantially
all of the properties or assets of the Company and its
Subsidiaries taken as a whole will be subject to the provisions
of the Indenture described above under the caption
Put Option of Holders Change of
Control and the provisions described above in
clause (f) under the caption Events of
Default and Remedies and not to the provisions of the
Asset Sales covenant); |
|
|
(b) |
the issue or sale by the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries of Equity Interests of any of the Companys
Subsidiaries; and |
|
|
(c) |
any Event of Loss, |
whether, in the case of clause (a), (b) or (c), in a
single transaction or a series of related transactions, provided
that such transaction or series of related transactions
(1) involves properties or assets having a fair market
value in excess of
2,500,000 or
(2) results in the payment of net proceeds (including
insurance proceeds from an Event of Loss) in excess of
2,500,000.
Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this definition, the
following transactions will be deemed not to be Asset Sales:
|
|
|
|
(A) |
a disposition of obsolete or excess equipment or other
properties or assets; |
|
|
(B) |
a disposition of properties or assets (including Equity
Interests) by the Company to a Wholly Owned Restricted
Subsidiary or by a Restricted Subsidiary to the Company or to a
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary; |
|
|
(C) |
a disposition of cash or Cash Equivalents; |
|
|
(D) |
a disposition of properties or assets (including Equity
Interests) that constitutes a Restricted Payment that is
permitted by the provisions of the Indenture described above
under the caption Certain
Covenants Restricted Payments; |
|
|
(E) |
any trade or exchange by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary of equipment or other properties or assets for
equipment or other properties or assets owned or held by another
Person, provided that the fair market value of the
properties or assets traded or exchanged by the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary (together with any cash or Cash
Equivalents) is reasonably equivalent to the fair market value
of the properties or assets (together with any cash or Cash
Equivalents) to be received by the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary; |
|
|
(F) |
the creation or perfection of a Lien on any properties or assets
(or any income or profits therefrom) of the Company or any of
its Restricted Subsidiaries that is not prohibited by the
covenant described under the caption Certain
Covenants Liens; |
|
|
(G) |
a sale-and-leaseback of the Companys office facilities in
Massy, France replacing the sale-and-leaseback transaction
relating to such facilities that is outstanding on the Issue
Date; |
|
|
(H) |
the surrender or waiver of contract rights or the settlement,
release or surrender of contractual, non-contractual or other
claims of any kind; |
|
|
(I) |
the sale or discount, in each case without recourse, of accounts
receivable arising in the ordinary course of business, but only
in connection with the compromise of collection thereof; |
|
|
(J) |
the factoring of accounts receivable arising in the ordinary
course of business pursuant to arrangements customary in the
region; and |
|
|
(K) |
the grant in the ordinary course of business of any
non-exclusive license of patents, trademarks, registrations
therefor and other similar intellectual property. |
Attributable Indebtedness in respect of a
sale-and-leaseback transaction means, at the time of
determination, the present value (discounted at the rate of
interest implicit in such transaction, determined in accordance
220
with GAAP) of the obligation of the lessee for net rental
payments during the remaining term of the lease included in such
sale-and-leaseback transaction (including any period for which
such lease has been extended or may, at the option of the
lessor, be extended). As used in the preceding sentence, the
net rental payments under any lease for any such
period shall mean the sum of rental and other payments required
to be paid with respect to such period by the lessee thereunder,
excluding any amounts required to be paid by such lessee on
account of maintenance and repairs, insurance, taxes,
assessments, water rates or similar charges. In the case of any
lease that is terminable by the lessee upon payment of penalty,
such net rental payment shall also include the amount of such
penalty, but no rent shall be considered as required to be paid
under such lease subsequent to the first date upon which it may
be so terminated.
Board of Directors means the Board of
Directors (Conseil dAdministration) of the Company,
or any authorized committee of the Board of Directors.
Capital Lease Obligation means, at the time
any determination thereof is to be made, the amount of the
liability in respect of a capital lease that would at such time
be required to be capitalized on a balance sheet in accordance
with GAAP.
Capital Stock means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
in the case of a corporation, corporate stock; |
|
|
(b) |
in the case of an association or business entity, any and all
shares, interests, participations, rights or other equivalents
(however designated) of corporate stock, including preferred
stock; |
|
|
(c) |
in the case of a partnership or limited liability company,
partnership or membership interests (whether general or
limited); and |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
any other interest or participation that confers on a Person the
right to receive a share of the profits and losses of, or
distributions of assets of, the issuing Person. |
Cash Equivalents means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
securities issued or directly and fully guaranteed or insured by
the government of the United States of America, the Republic of
France or any other country whose sovereign debt has a rating of
at least A3 from Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and
at least A- from Standard & Poors Ratings
Services or any agency or instrumentality of any such government
(provided that the full faith and credit of such
government is pledged in support thereof), in each case having
maturities of not more than 12 months from the date of
acquisition; |
|
|
(b) |
certificates of deposit, Eurodollar time deposits and French
negotiable debt instruments (titres de créances
négociables) with maturities of 12 months or less
from the date of acquisition, bankers acceptances with
maturities not exceeding six months and overnight bank deposits,
in each case with or issued by any commercial bank organized
under the laws of any country that is a member of the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development having
capital and surplus in excess of
500,000,000 and
whose long-term debt securities are rated at least A3 by
Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and at least A- by
Standard & Poors Ratings Services; |
|
|
(c) |
repurchase obligations with a term of not more than seven days
for underlying securities of the types described in
clauses (a) and (b) above entered into with any
financial institution meeting the qualifications specified in
clause (b) above; |
|
|
(d) |
commercial paper and French negotiable debt instruments
(titres de créances négociables) having a
rating of at least P-1 from Moodys Investors Service, Inc.
or at least A-1 from Standard & Poors Ratings
Services and in each case maturing within 12 months after
the date of acquisition; |
|
|
(e) |
deposits available for withdrawal on demand with any commercial
bank not meeting the qualifications specified in clause (b)
above, provided that all such deposits are made in the
ordinary course of business, do not remain on deposit for more
than 30 consecutive days and do not exceed
25,000,000 |
221
|
|
|
|
|
in the aggregate at any one time, with no more than
5,000,000 being
deposited in commercial banks within a single country; and |
|
|
(f) |
money market mutual funds substantially all of the assets of
which are of the type described in any of the foregoing
clauses (a) to (d). |
Common Stock means the common or ordinary
shares of the Company.
Consolidated Cash Flow means, with respect to
any Person for any period, the Consolidated Net Income of such
Person for such period plus, to the extent deducted or excluded
in calculating Consolidated Net Income for such period:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
provision for taxes based on income or profits of such Person
and its Restricted Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(b) |
Consolidated Interest Expense of such Person and its Restricted
Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(c) |
depreciation and amortization (including amortization or
impairment, if any, of goodwill and of other intangibles but
excluding amortization of prepaid cash expenses that were paid
in a prior period) of such Person and its Restricted
Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(d) |
other non-cash expenses (excluding any such non-cash expense to
the extent that it represents an accrual of or reserve for cash
expenses in any future period or amortization of a prepaid cash
expense that was paid in a prior period) of such Person and its
Restricted Subsidiaries less any non-cash items increasing
Consolidated Net Income of such Person and its Restricted
Subsidiaries (other than items that will result in cash receipt); |
|
|
(e) |
any expenses, fees, charges or other costs related to any equity
offering (other than of Disqualified Stock) permitted by the
indenture (whether or not successful); and |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
without duplication, an amount equal to any extraordinary loss
plus any net loss realized by such Person or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries in connection with an Asset Sale, in
each case, on a consolidated basis and determined in accordance
with GAAP. |
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio means,
with respect to any Person for any period, the ratio of the
Consolidated Cash Flow of such Person for such period to the
Consolidated Interest Expense of such Person for such period;
provided, however, that the Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio shall be calculated giving pro forma
effect to each of the following transactions as if each such
transaction had occurred at the beginning of the applicable
reference period:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
any incurrence, assumption, guarantee, repayment, purchase or
redemption by such Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries
of any Indebtedness (other than revolving credit borrowings)
subsequent to the commencement of the period for which the
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is being calculated but
prior to the date on which the event for which the calculation
of the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is made (the
Calculation Date); |
|
|
(b) |
any acquisition that has been made by such Person or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries, or approved and expected to be
consummated within 30 days of the Calculation Date,
including, in each case, through a merger or consolidation, and
including any related financing transactions, during the
reference period or subsequent to such reference period and on
or prior to the Calculation Date; and |
|
|
(c) |
any other transaction that may be given pro forma effect
in accordance with Article 11 of
Regulation S-X
under the Securities Act as in effect from time to time; |
provided further, however, that (1) the Consolidated
Cash Flow attributable to discontinued operations, as determined
in accordance with GAAP, and operations or businesses disposed
of prior to the Calculation Date, shall be excluded and
(2) the Consolidated Interest Expense attributable to
discontinued operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP,
and operations or businesses disposed of prior to the
Calculation Date, shall be excluded, but only to the extent that
the obligations giving rise to such Consolidated Interest
Expense will not be obligations of the referent Person or any of
its Restricted Subsidiaries following the Calculation Date.
222
Consolidated Interest Expense means, with
respect to any Person for any period, the sum, without
duplication, of the following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the consolidated interest expense of such Person and its
Restricted Subsidiaries for such period, whether paid or accrued
(including, without limitation, amortization of original issue
discount, non-cash interest payments, the interest component of
any deferred payment obligations, the interest component of all
payments associated with Capital Lease Obligations, commissions,
discounts and other fees and charges incurred in respect of
letter of credit or bankers acceptance financings, and net
of all payments made or received (if any) pursuant to Hedging
Obligations in respect of interest rates but excluding
amortization of debt issuance costs and non-cash charges other
than non-cash interest expenses related to convertible
bonds); and |
|
|
(b) |
the consolidated interest expense of such Person and its
Restricted Subsidiaries that was capitalized during such period. |
Consolidated Net Income means, with respect
to any Person for any period, the aggregate of the Net Income of
such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period, on
a consolidated basis, determined in accordance with GAAP,
provided that:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the Net Income (but not loss) of any Person that is not a
Restricted Subsidiary or that is accounted for by the equity
method of accounting shall be included only to the extent of the
amount of dividends or distributions paid in cash to the
referent Person or a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary thereof; |
|
|
(b) |
the Net Income of any Restricted Subsidiary shall be excluded to
the extent that the declaration or payment of dividends or
similar distributions by that Restricted Subsidiary of that Net
Income is not at the date of determination permitted without any
prior governmental approval (that has not been obtained) or,
directly or indirectly, by operation of the terms of its charter
or any agreement, instrument, judgment, decree, order, statute,
rule or governmental regulation applicable to that Subsidiary or
its stockholders; and |
|
|
(c) |
the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles shall
be excluded. |
Consolidated Net Worth means, with respect to
any Person as of any date, the consolidated stockholders
equity of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries as of such
date less the amount of consolidated stockholders equity
attributable to Disqualified Stock or treasury stock of such
Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries as of such date, in each
case determined in accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Tangible Net Worth means, at any
date, the Consolidated Net Worth of the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries as shown on their most recent
consolidated balance sheet less, without duplication, all
goodwill, trade names, trademarks, patents, unamortized debt
discount and expense and other like intangibles, as determined
in accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Total Assets means, with respect
to any Person as of any date, the consolidated total assets of
such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries as of such date, as
determined in accordance with GAAP.
Credit Facilities means, with respect to any
Person, one or more debt facilities or commercial paper
facilities with banks or other institutional lenders (including
with special purpose vehicles established by such banks or
lenders to provide such facilities) providing for revolving
credit loans, term loans, receivables financing (including
through the sale of receivables to such lenders or to special
purpose entities formed to borrow from such lenders against such
receivables) or trade letters of credit, in each case, as
amended, restated, modified, renewed, refunded, replaced or
refinanced in whole or in part from time to time.
Default means any event that is, or with the
passage of time or the giving of notice or both would be, an
Event of Default.
Disqualified Stock means any Capital Stock
that, by its terms (or by the terms of any security into which
it is convertible or for which it is exchangeable), or upon the
happening of any event, matures (excluding any maturity as a
result of an optional redemption by the issuer thereof) or is
mandatorily redeemable, pursuant to a sinking fund obligation or
otherwise, or redeemable at the option of the holder thereof, in
whole or in part, on or
223
prior to the date that is 91 days after the date on which
the Notes mature or are redeemed or retired in full;
provided, however, that any Capital Stock that would
constitute Disqualified Stock solely because the holders thereof
(or of any security into which it is convertible or for which it
is exchangeable) have the right to require the issuer to
purchase such Capital Stock (or such security into which it is
convertible or for which it is exchangeable) upon the occurrence
of any of the events constituting an Asset Sale or a Change of
Control shall not constitute Disqualified Stock if such Capital
Stock (and all such securities into which it is convertible or
for which it is exchangeable) provides that the issuer thereof
may not purchase or redeem any such Capital Stock (or any such
security into which it is convertible or for which it is
exchangeable) pursuant to such provisions prior to compliance by
the Company with the provisions of the Indenture described under
the caption Put Option of Holders
Change of Control or Put Option of
Holders Asset Sales, as the case may be.
Equity Interests means Capital Stock and all
warrants, options or other rights to acquire Capital Stock (but
excluding any debt security that is convertible into, or
exchangeable for, Capital Stock).
euro or
means the single currency of participating member states of the
European Economic and Monetary Union as contemplated by the
Treaty Establishing the European Union.
Euro Equivalent means, with respect to any
monetary amount in a currency other than euros, at or as of any
time for the determination thereof, the amount of euros obtained
by converting such foreign currency involved in such computation
into euros at the spot rate for the purchase of euros with the
applicable foreign currency as quoted by Reuters (or, if Reuters
ceases to provide such spot quotations, by any other reputable
service as is providing such spot quotations, as selected by the
Company) at approximately 11:00 a.m. (New York City time)
on the date not more than two business days prior to such
determination.
Event of Loss means, with respect to any
property or asset of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary,
(a) any damage to such property or asset that results in an
insurance settlement with respect thereto on the basis of a
total loss or a constructive or compromised total loss or
(b) the confiscation, condemnation or requisition of title
to such property or asset by any government or instrumentality
or agency thereof.
Exchange Act means the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Existing Indebtedness means Indebtedness of
the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than
Indebtedness under the Credit Facilities) in existence on the
date of the Indenture, until such amounts are repaid, but shall
not include any Indebtedness that is repaid with the proceeds of
the New Notes.
The term fair market value means, with
respect to any asset or Investment, the fair market value of
such asset or Investment at the time of the event requiring such
determination, as determined in good faith by the Company, or,
with respect to any asset or Investment in excess of
15,000,000
(other than cash or Cash Equivalents), as determined by a
reputable investment banking, accounting or appraisal firm that
is, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, qualified to
perform the task for which such firm has been engaged and
independent with respect to the Company.
Foreign Restricted Subsidiary means each of
CGG Asia Pacific and CGG Pan India Ltd.
GAAP means International Financial Reporting
Standards, accounting principles adopted by the International
Accounting Standards Board and its predecessor, as in effect
from time to time.
guarantee means a guarantee other than by
endorsement of negotiable instruments for collection in the
ordinary course of business, direct or indirect, in any manner
including, without limitation, by way of pledge of assets or
through letters of credit or reimbursement agreements in respect
thereof, of all or any part of any Indebtedness.
Guarantor means each of:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Sercel Inc., Sercel Canada Ltd., Sercel Australia Pty Ltd, CGG
Americas, Inc., CGG Canada Services Ltd., CGG Marine Resources
Norge A/ S, CGGVeritas Services Inc., Veritas DGC Land Inc.,
Veritas Geophysical Corporation, Veritas Investments Inc.,
Viking Maritime Inc., Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC,
Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd. and Alitheia Resources
Inc.; and |
224
|
|
|
|
(2) |
any other Subsidiary of the Company that executes a supplemental
indenture providing for a Subsidiary Guarantee in accordance
with the provisions of Indenture, |
and their respective successors and assigns, in each case, until
the Subsidiary Guarantee of such Person has been released in
accordance with the provisions of the Indenture.
Hedging Obligations means, with respect to
any Person, the obligations of such Person under:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
interest rate swap agreements, interest rate cap agreements and
interest rate collar agreements; |
|
|
(b) |
other agreements or arrangements designed to protect such Person
against fluctuations in interest rates; and |
|
|
(c) |
any foreign currency futures contract, option or similar
agreement or arrangement designed to protect such Person against
fluctuations in currency exchange rates or commodity prices, |
in each case to the extent such obligations are incurred in the
ordinary course of business of such Person and not for
speculative purposes.
Indebtedness means, with respect to any
Person, any indebtedness of such Person, without duplication,
whether or not contingent, in respect of borrowed money
including, without limitation, any guarantee thereof, or
evidenced by bonds, notes, debentures or similar instruments or
letters of credit (or reimbursement agreements in respect
thereof) or bankers acceptances or representing Capital
Lease Obligations or the balance deferred and unpaid of the
purchase price of any property, except any such balance that
constitutes an accrued expense or trade account payable, or
representing any Hedging Obligations, if and to the extent any
of the preceding indebtedness (other than letters of credit,
guarantees and Hedging Obligations) would appear as a liability
upon a balance sheet of such Person prepared in accordance with
GAAP. The amount of any Indebtedness outstanding as of any date
shall be (a) the accreted value thereof, in the case of any
Indebtedness that does not require current payments of interest,
and (b) the principal amount thereof, in the case of any
other Indebtedness (with letters of credit being deemed to have
a principal amount equal to the maximum potential liability of
the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries thereunder).
Investment Grade Status shall occur when the
Notes receive a rating of BBB- or higher from
S&P (or its equivalent under any successor rating categories
of S&P) and a rating of Baa3 or higher from
Moodys (or its equivalent under any successor rating
categories of Moodys) or, if either such entity ceases to
rate the Notes for reasons outside the normal control of the
Company, the equivalent investment grade credit rating from any
other nationally recognized statistical rating
organization, as that term is used in
Rule 15c3-1 under
the Exchange Act, selected by the Company as a replacement
agency.
Investments means, with respect to any
Person, all investments by such Person in other Persons
(including Affiliates) in the forms of direct or indirect loans
(including guarantees by the referent Person of, and Liens on
any assets of the referent Person securing, Indebtedness or
other obligations of other Persons), advances or capital
contributions (excluding commission, travel and similar advances
to directors, officers and employees made in the ordinary course
of business), purchases or other acquisitions for consideration
of Indebtedness, Equity Interests or other securities, together
with all items that are or would be classified as investments on
a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP; provided,
however, that the following shall not constitute
Investments: (1) extensions of trade credit or other
advances to customers on commercially reasonable terms in
accordance with normal trade practices or otherwise in the
ordinary course of business, (2) Hedging Obligations and
(3) endorsements of negotiable instruments and documents in
the ordinary course of business. If the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary of the Company sells or otherwise disposes
of any Equity Interests of any direct or indirect Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company such that, after giving effect to any
such sale or disposition, such Person is no longer a Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company, the Company shall be deemed to have
made an Investment on the date of any such sale or disposition
equal to the fair market value of the Equity Interests of such
Restricted Subsidiary not sold or disposed of in an amount
determined as provided in the final paragraph of the covenant
described above under the caption Certain
Covenants Restricted Payments.
Issue Date means the date on which the Notes
are originally issued.
225
Lien means, with respect to any asset, any
mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security interest or encumbrance
of any kind in respect of such asset, whether or not filed,
recorded or otherwise perfected under applicable law (including
any conditional sale or other title retention agreement, any
lease in the nature thereof, any option or other agreement to
sell or give a security interest in and any filing of or
agreement to give any financing statement under the Uniform
Commercial Code (or equivalent statutes) of any jurisdiction
other than a precautionary financing statement respecting a
lease not intended as a security agreement) or any assignment
(or agreement to assign) any right to income or profits from any
assets by way of security.
Merger includes a fusion, an amalgamation, a
compulsory share exchange, a conversion of a corporation into
another business entity and any other transaction having effects
substantially similar to a merger under the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware.
Net Income means, with respect to any Person,
the net income (or loss) of such Person, determined in
accordance with GAAP and before any reduction in respect of
preferred stock dividends, excluding, however:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
any gain (but not loss), together with any related provision for
taxes on such gain (but not loss), realized in connection with
(1) any Asset Sale (including, without limitation,
dispositions pursuant to sale-and-leaseback transactions) or
(2) the disposition of any securities by such Person or any
of its Restricted Subsidiaries or the extinguishment of any
Indebtedness of such Person or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries; and |
|
|
(b) |
any extraordinary or non-recurring gain (but not loss), together
with any related provision for taxes on such extraordinary or
non-recurring gain (but not loss). |
Net Proceeds means the aggregate cash
proceeds received by the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries in respect of any Asset Sale (including, without
limitation, any cash received upon the sale or other disposition
of any non-cash consideration received in any Asset Sale), net
of (without duplication) the following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the direct costs relating to such Asset Sale (including, without
limitation, legal, accounting and investment banking fees, sales
commissions, recording fees, title transfer fees, title
insurance premiums, appraiser fees, other
out-of-pocket expenses
and costs incurred in connection with preparing such asset for
sale) and any relocation expenses incurred as a result thereof; |
|
|
(b) |
taxes paid or estimated to be payable as a result thereof (after
taking into account any available tax credits or deductions and
any tax sharing arrangements that will result in a reduction in
consolidated tax liability); |
|
|
(c) |
amounts required to be applied to the repayment of Indebtedness
(other than under a revolving credit facility) secured by a Lien
on the asset or assets that were the subject of such Asset
Sale; and |
|
|
(d) |
any reserve (including any reserve against any liabilities
associated with such Asset Sale and retained by the Company or
the relevant Restricted Subsidiary) established in accordance
with GAAP or any amount placed in escrow, in either case for
adjustment in respect of the sale price of such asset or assets,
until such time as such reserve is reversed or such escrow
arrangement is terminated, in which case Net Proceeds shall
include only the amount of the reserve so reversed or the amount
returned to the Company or its Restricted Subsidiaries from such
escrow arrangement, as the case may be. |
Non-Recourse Debt means Indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
as to which neither the Company nor any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries (1) provides credit support of any kind
(including any undertaking, agreement or instrument that would
constitute Indebtedness) or is otherwise directly or indirectly
liable (as a guarantor or otherwise) or (2) constitutes the
lender; |
|
|
(b) |
no default with respect to which (including any rights the
holders thereof may have to take enforcement action against an
Unrestricted Subsidiary) would permit (upon notice, lapse of
time or both) the holders of Indebtedness of the Company or any
of its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than the Notes) to declare
a default on such Indebtedness or cause the payment thereof to
be accelerated or payable prior to its stated maturity; and |
226
|
|
|
|
(c) |
as to which the lenders have been notified in writing that they
will not have any recourse to the stock or assets of the Company
or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries. |
Offering means the offering of the Additional
Notes by the Company pursuant to this prospectus.
Pari Passu Indebtedness means, with respect
to any Net Proceeds from Asset Sales, Indebtedness of the
Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries the terms of which
require the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary to apply such
Net Proceeds to offer to purchase such Indebtedness.
Permitted Guarantees means any guarantee:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
guaranteeing or securing the Notes or any Guarantee; |
|
|
(2) |
in favor of the Company or a Guarantor; |
|
|
(3) |
guaranteeing Indebtedness incurred pursuant to clause (a)
of the second paragraph of the covenant described under the
caption Certain Covenants
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred
Stock; or |
|
|
(4) |
in existence on the date of the Indenture to the extent
guaranteeing Existing Indebtedness and Permitted Refinancing
Indebtedness in respect thereof incurred in compliance with
clause (j) of the second paragraph of the covenant
described under the caption Certain
Covenants Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock. |
Permitted Investments means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
any Investment in the Company (including, without limitation,
any acquisition of the Notes) or in a Wholly Owned Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company, other than any Investment described
in clause (a) of the definition of Restricted
Payments; |
|
|
(b) |
any Investment in Cash Equivalents; |
|
|
(c) |
any Investment by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of
the Company in a Person if as a result of such Investment
(1) such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company or (2) such Person is merged or consolidated with
or into, or transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its
properties or assets to, or is liquidated into, the Company or a
Restricted Subsidiary of the Company; |
|
|
(d) |
any Investment made as a result of the receipt of non-cash
consideration from (1) an Asset Sale that was made pursuant
to and in compliance with the covenant described above under the
caption Put Option of Holders
Asset Sales or (2) a disposition of assets that does
not constitute an Asset Sale; |
|
|
(e) |
Investments in stock, obligations or securities received in
settlement of any claim or debts owing to the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary as a result of bankruptcy or insolvency
proceedings or received in satisfaction of any judgment or in
settlement of any claim in circumstances where the Company does
not expect it would receive cash payment in a timely manner, or
upon the foreclosure, perfection or enforcement of any Lien in
favor of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, in each case
as to any claim or debts owing to the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary that arose in the ordinary course of business of the
Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary, provided that
any stocks, obligations or securities received in settlement of
any claim or debts that arose in the ordinary course of business
(and received other than as a result of bankruptcy or insolvency
proceedings or received in satisfaction of any judgment or in
settlement of any claim in circumstances where the Company does
not expect it would receive cash payment in a timely manner, or
upon foreclosure, perfection or enforcement of any Lien) that
are, within 180 days of receipt, converted into cash or
Cash Equivalents shall be treated as having been cash or Cash
Equivalents at the time received; |
|
|
(f) |
Investments in Argas Ltd. consisting of guarantees of its
obligations incurred in the ordinary course of its business,
provided that such Investments, when taken together with
all other Investments made pursuant to this clause (f) that
are at the time outstanding, do not exceed
50,000,000; |
227
|
|
|
|
(g) |
Investments in Argas Ltd. (other than those described in
clause (f) above) and any other Affiliate organized in a
foreign jurisdiction that is required by the applicable laws and
regulations of such foreign jurisdiction or its governmental
agencies, authorities or state-owned businesses to be majority
owned by the government of such foreign jurisdiction or
individual or corporate citizens of such foreign jurisdiction or
another foreign jurisdiction in order for such Affiliate to
transact business in such foreign jurisdiction, provided that
such Investments, when taken together with all other
Investments made pursuant to this clause (g) that are at
the time outstanding, do not exceed 20% of Consolidated Tangible
Net Worth; |
|
|
(h) |
Investments in any Person in exchange for, or out of the net
cash proceeds of, an issue or sale by the Company of Equity
Interests (other than Disqualified Stock); and |
|
|
(i) |
other Investments in any Person having an aggregate fair market
value (measured on the date each such Investment was made and
without giving effect to subsequent changes in value), when
taken together with all other Investments made pursuant to this
clause (i) that are at the time outstanding, do not exceed
25,000,000. |
Permitted Liens means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Liens securing Indebtedness incurred pursuant to clause (a)
of the second paragraph of the covenant described under the
caption Certain Covenants
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified
Stock, and Liens securing any other Indebtedness under
Credit Facilities incurred pursuant to the first paragraph of
such covenant; |
|
|
(b) |
Liens in favor of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(c) |
Liens on any property or asset of a Person existing at the time
such Person is merged into or consolidated with the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, provided that
such Liens were in existence prior to such merger or
consolidation, were not created in contemplation of it and do
not extend to any property or asset of the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries other than those of the Person merged
into or consolidated with the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(d) |
Liens on any property or asset existing at the time of
acquisition thereof by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary
of the Company, provided that such Liens were in
existence prior to such acquisition, were not created in
contemplation of it and do not extend to any other property or
asset of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
(e) |
Liens securing the performance of statutory obligations, surety
or appeal bonds, bid or performance bonds, insurance obligations
or other obligations of a like nature incurred in the ordinary
course of business; |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
Liens securing Hedging Obligations; |
|
|
(g) |
Liens existing on the date of the Indenture; |
|
|
(h) |
Liens securing Indebtedness (including Capital Lease
Obligations) permitted by clause (g) of the second
paragraph of the covenant described under the caption
Certain Covenants Incurrence of
Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified Stock,
provided that such Liens extend only to the property,
plant or equipment financed by such Indebtedness; |
|
|
(i) |
any interest or title of a lessor under an operating lease; |
|
|
(j) |
Liens arising by reason of deposits necessary to obtain standby
letters of credit in the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
(k) |
Liens on real or personal property or assets of the Company or a
Restricted Subsidiary thereof to secure Indebtedness incurred
for the purpose of (1) financing all or any part of the
purchase price of such property or assets incurred prior to, at
the time of, or within 90 days after, the acquisition of
such property or assets or (2) financing all or any part of
the cost of construction or improvement of any |
228
|
|
|
|
|
such property or assets, provided that the amount of any
such financing shall not exceed the amount expended in the
acquisition of, or the construction of, such property or assets
and such Liens shall not extend to any other property or assets
of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary (other than any
associated accounts, contracts and insurance proceeds); |
|
|
(l) |
judgment Liens not giving rise to an Event of Default so long as
any appropriate legal proceeding which may have been duly
initiated for the review of such judgment shall not have been
finally terminated or the period within which such proceeding
may be initiated shall not have expired; |
|
|
(m) |
Liens securing Indebtedness of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company that does not exceed
10,000,000 at
any one time outstanding; |
|
|
(n) |
Liens securing Acquired Indebtedness incurred pursuant to the
first paragraph of the covenant described under the caption
Certain Covenants Incurrence of
Indebtedness and Issuance of Disqualified Stock, provided
that such Liens (1) secured such Acquired Indebtedness at
the time of and prior to the incurrence of such Acquired
Indebtedness by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company and were not granted in connection with, or in
anticipation of, such incurrence, and (2) do not extend to
any property or asset of the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries other than the property or asset that secured the
Acquired Indebtedness prior to the time that it became Acquired
Indebtedness of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company; and |
|
|
(o) |
Liens securing Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness with respect
to any Indebtedness secured by Liens referred to in
clauses (c), (d), (g), (h), (k) and (n) above and
in this clause (o). |
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness means any
Indebtedness of the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries issued in exchange for, or the net proceeds of
which are used to extend, refinance, renew, replace, defease or
refund other Indebtedness of the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries; provided, however, that:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the principal amount (or accreted value, if applicable) of such
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness does not exceed the principal
amount of (or accreted value, if applicable), plus premium, if
any, and accrued interest on, the Indebtedness so extended,
refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded (plus the
amount of expenses incurred in connection therewith); |
|
|
(b) |
such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness has a final maturity
date no earlier than the final maturity date of, and has a
Weighted Average Life to Maturity equal to or greater than the
Weighted Average Life to Maturity of, the Indebtedness being
extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded; |
|
|
(c) |
if the Indebtedness being extended, refinanced, renewed,
replaced, defeased or refunded is subordinated in right of
payment to the Notes, such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness is
subordinated in right of payment to the Notes on terms at least
as favorable, taken as a whole, to the holders of the Notes as
those contained in the documentation governing the Indebtedness
being extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or
refunded; and |
|
|
(d) |
if the Company is the obligor on the Indebtedness being
extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded,
then such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness is solely
Indebtedness of the Company, |
provided, however, that a Restricted Subsidiary that is
also a Guarantor may guarantee Permitted Refinancing
Indebtedness incurred by the Company, whether or not such
Restricted Subsidiary was an obligor or guarantor of the
Indebtedness being extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced,
defeased or refunded; provided further, however, that if
such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness is subordinated to the
Notes, such guarantee shall be subordinated to such Restricted
Subsidiarys Subsidiary Guarantee to at least the same
extent.
Person means any individual, corporation,
partnership, joint venture, association, joint-stock company,
trust, unincorporated organization, limited liability company or
government or other entity.
229
Qualified Equity Offering means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
any issuance and sale of Equity Interests (other than
Disqualified Stock) of the Company pursuant to an underwritten
offering registered under the Securities Act; or |
|
|
(b) |
any other issuance and sale of Equity Interests (other than
Disqualified Stock) of the Company so long as, at the time of
consummation of such sale, the Company has a class of common
equity securities (including American depositary shares)
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) or Section 12(g)
under the Exchange Act. |
Reference Date means April 28, 2005.
Restricted Investment means an Investment
other than a Permitted Investment.
Restricted Subsidiary of a Person means any
Subsidiary of such Person that is not an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
Securities Act means the U.S. Securities
Act of 1933, as amended.
Sercel Inc. means Sercel Inc., a Texas
corporation with its head office in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and a
Restricted Subsidiary of the Company as of the Issue Date.
Sercel S.A. means:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Sercel S.A., a French limited liability corporation with its
head office in Carquefou, France, and a Restricted Subsidiary of
the Company as of the Issue Date; and/or |
|
|
(b) |
any company (including Sercel Holding S.A.) that holds all of
the outstanding Capital Stock of either or both of Sercel S.A.
and Sercel Inc. (other than directors qualifying shares
and Capital Stock held by other statutorily required minority
shareholders). |
Significant Subsidiary means any Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company that would be a significant
subsidiary as defined in Article 1,
Rule 1-02 of
Regulation S-X,
promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act, as such Regulation
is in effect on the date of the Indenture.
Stated Maturity means, with respect to any
mandatory sinking fund or other installment of interest or
principal on any series of Indebtedness, the date on which such
payment of interest or principal was scheduled to be paid in the
original documentation governing such Indebtedness, and shall
not include any contingent obligations to repay, redeem or
purchase any such interest or principal prior to the date
originally scheduled for the payment thereof.
Strategic Assets means assets or rights
(other than assets that would be classified as current assets in
accordance with GAAP) of the kind used or usable by the Company
or its Restricted Subsidiaries in the business of providing
services or software products to the oil and gas industry or
manufacturing equipment for use by the oil and gas industry (or
any business that is reasonably complementary or related thereto
as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors).
Subsidiary means, with respect to any Person:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
any corporation, association or other business entity of which
more than 50% of the total voting power of shares of Capital
Stock entitled (without regard to the occurrence of any
contingency) to vote in the election of directors, managers or
trustees thereof is at the time owned or controlled, directly or
indirectly, by such Person or one or more of the other
Subsidiaries of that Person (or a combination thereof); |
|
|
(b) |
any partnership (1) the sole general partner or the
managing general partner of which is such Person or a Subsidiary
of such Person or (2) the only general partners of which are
such Person or of one or more Subsidiaries of such Person (or
any combination thereof); and |
|
|
(c) |
any other Person whose results for financial reporting purposes
are consolidated with those of such Person in accordance with
GAAP. |
230
Subsidiary Guarantee means the guarantee by
each Guarantor of the Companys obligations under the
Indenture and the Notes (including any Additional Notes),
executed pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture.
Treasury Rate means, as of any redemption
date in respect of the Notes, the yield to maturity as of such
redemption date of United States Treasury securities with a
constant maturity (as compiled and published in the most recent
Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15(519) that has become
publicly available at least two business days prior to the
redemption date (or, if such Statistical Release is no longer
published, any publicly available source of similar market
data)) most nearly equal to the period from the redemption date
to May 15, 2012; provided, however, that if the
period from the redemption date to May 15, 2012 is less
than one year, the weekly average yield on actually traded
United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant
maturity of one year shall be used.
Unrestricted Subsidiary means any Subsidiary
of the Company that is designated by the Board of Directors as
an Unrestricted Subsidiary pursuant to a Board Resolution and
any Subsidiary of an Unrestricted Subsidiary. The Board of
Directors may designate a Subsidiary as an Unrestricted
Subsidiary only to the extent that such Subsidiary at the time
of such designation:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
has no Indebtedness other than Non-Recourse Debt; |
|
|
(b) |
is not party to any agreement, contract, arrangement or
understanding with the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of
the Company unless such agreement, contract, arrangement or
understanding does not violate the terms of the Indenture
described under the caption Certain
Covenants Transactions with
Affiliates; and |
|
|
(c) |
is a Person with respect to which neither the Company nor any of
its Restricted Subsidiaries has any direct or indirect
obligation (1) to subscribe for additional Equity Interests
or (2) to maintain or preserve such Persons financial
condition or to cause such Person to achieve any specified
levels of operating results. |
Any such designation by the Board of Directors shall be
evidenced to the Trustee by filing with the Trustee the Board
Resolution giving effect to such designation and an
Officers Certificate certifying that such designation
complied with the foregoing conditions and was permitted by the
covenant described under the caption Certain
Covenants Restricted Payments. If, at any
time, any Unrestricted Subsidiary would fail to meet the
preceding requirements as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, it shall
thereafter cease to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary for purposes
of the Indenture and any Indebtedness of such Subsidiary shall
be deemed to be incurred by a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company as of such date (and, if such Indebtedness is not
permitted to be incurred as of such date under the covenant
described under the caption Certain
Covenants Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock, the Company shall be in default of
such covenant). The Board of Directors may at any time designate
any Unrestricted Subsidiary to be a Restricted Subsidiary,
provided that such designation shall be deemed to be an
incurrence of Indebtedness by a Restricted Subsidiary of the
Company of any outstanding Indebtedness of such Unrestricted
Subsidiary and such designation shall only be permitted if:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
such Indebtedness is permitted under the covenant described
under the caption Certain
Covenants Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of
Disqualified Stock; calculated on a pro forma basis as if
such designation had occurred at the beginning of the
four-quarter reference period; and |
|
|
(2) |
no Default or Event of Default would be in existence following
such designation. |
U.S. Dollar Equivalent means, with
respect to any monetary amount in a currency other than
U.S. dollars, at or as of any time for the determination
thereof, the amount of U.S. dollars obtained by converting
such foreign currency involved in such computation into
U.S. dollars at the spot rate for the purchase of
U.S. dollars with the applicable foreign currency as quoted
by Reuters (or, if Reuters ceases to provide such spot
quotations, by any other reputable service as is providing such
spot quotations, as selected by the Company) at approximately
11:00 a.m. (New York City time) on the date not more than
two business days prior to such determination.
Voting Stock of any Person as of any date
means the Capital Stock of such Person that is at the time
entitled to vote in the election of the board of directors,
managers or trustees of such Person.
231
Weighted Average Life to Maturity means, when
applied to any Indebtedness at any date, the number of years
obtained by dividing (a) the sum of the products obtained
by multiplying (1) the amount of each then remaining
installment, sinking fund, serial maturity or other required
payments of principal, including payment at final maturity, in
respect thereof, by (2) the number of years (calculated to
the nearest one twelfth) that will elapse between such date and
the making of such payment, by (b) the then outstanding
principal amount of such Indebtedness.
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary of any
Person means a Restricted Subsidiary of such Person to the
extent that:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
all of the outstanding Capital Stock or other ownership
interests of which (other than directors qualifying shares
and Capital Stock held by other statutorily required minority
shareholders) shall at the time be owned directly or indirectly
by such Person; or |
|
|
(b) |
such Restricted Subsidiary is organized in a foreign
jurisdiction and is required by the applicable laws and
regulations of such foreign jurisdiction or its governmental
agencies, authorities or state-owned businesses to be partially
owned by the government of such foreign jurisdiction or
individual or corporate citizens of such foreign jurisdiction or
another foreign jurisdiction in order for such Restricted
Subsidiary to transact business in such foreign jurisdiction,
provided that such Person, by contract or otherwise,
controls the business and management of such Restricted
Subsidiary. |
Further, in relation to the Company, the term Wholly Owned
Restricted Subsidiary includes any Foreign Restricted
Subsidiary so long as the direct or indirect ownership interest
of the Company in its Capital Stock is no less than at the Issue
Date.
232
TAXATION
Introduction
The statements herein regarding taxation are based on the laws
in force as of the date of this prospectus and are subject to
any changes in law occurring after such date, which changes
could be made on a retrospective basis. The following summaries
do not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax
considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase,
own or dispose of notes and does not purport to deal with the
tax consequences applicable to all categories of investor, some
of which (such as dealers in securities or commodities) may be
subject to special rules. Prospective purchasers of notes are
advised to consult their own tax advisers concerning tax
consequences of their ownership of notes.
TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH TREASURY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR 230,
PROSPECTIVE HOLDERS ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT: (A) ANY
DISCUSSION OF FEDERAL TAX ISSUES IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT
INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE RELIED UPON, AND CANNOT BE RELIED
UPON, BY HOLDERS FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY
BE IMPOSED ON HOLDERS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE;
(B) SUCH DISCUSSION IS INCLUDED HEREIN BY THE ISSUER IN
CONNECTION WITH THE PROMOTION OR MARKETING (WITHIN THE MEANING
OF CIRCULAR 230) BY THE ISSUER OF THE TRANSACTIONS OR MATTERS
ADDRESSED HEREIN; AND (C) PROSPECTIVE HOLDERS SHOULD SEEK
ADVICE BASED ON THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES FROM AN
INDEPENDENT TAX ADVISOR.
United States Federal Tax Considerations
The following is a summary of certain material U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and
disposition of notes by a U.S. Holder (as defined below).
This summary deals only with initial purchasers of notes at the
issue price that are U.S. Holders and that will hold the
notes as capital assets. The discussion does not cover all
aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be
relevant to, or the actual tax effect that any of the matters
described herein will have on, the acquisition, ownership or
disposition of notes by particular investors, and does not
address state, local, foreign or other tax laws. In particular,
this summary does not discuss all of the tax considerations that
may be relevant to certain types of investors subject to special
treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws (such as
financial institutions, insurance companies, investors liable
for the alternative minimum tax, individual retirement accounts
and other tax-deferred accounts, tax-exempt organisations,
dealers in securities or currencies, investors that will hold
the Notes as part of straddles, hedging transactions or
conversion transactions for U.S. federal income tax
purposes or investors whose functional currency is not the
U.S. dollar).
As used herein, the term U.S. Holder means a
beneficial owner of notes that is, for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, (i) an individual citizen or resident of the
United States, (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated
as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes) created or
organised under the laws of the United States or any State
thereof, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to
U.S. federal income tax without regard to its source or
(iv) a trust if a court within the United States is able to
exercise primary supervision over the administration of the
trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to
control all substantial decisions of the trust, or the trust has
validly elected to be treated as a domestic trust for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in a
partnership that holds notes will depend on the status of the
partner and the activities of the partnership. Prospective
purchasers that are partners or partnerships should consult
their tax advisers concerning the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of
notes.
The summary is based on the tax laws of the United States,
including the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its
legislative history, existing and proposed regulations
thereunder, published rulings and court decisions, all as
currently in effect and all subject to change at any time,
possibly with retroactive effect.
THE SUMMARY OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES SET
OUT BELOW IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. ALL PROSPECTIVE
PURCHASERS SHOULD CONSULT
233
THEIR TAX ADVISERS AS TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES TO
THEM OF OWNING THE NOTES, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT
OF STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS AND POSSIBLE CHANGES
IN TAX LAW.
Fungibility of the Additional Notes
Provided that the additional notes are not issued with more than
a de minimis amount of original issue discount (OID)
as discussed below, they will have the same CUSIP number and
will trade interchangeably with the existing notes.
In the event that the additional notes are issued with more than
a de minimis amount of OID, the additional notes will be issued
with a separate CUSIP number and will likely be treated as a
separate series for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In
such a case, the additional notes will be considered to have
been issued with OID and the treatment below under
Original Issue Discount would apply.
Payments of Interest
Interest on the notes will be taxable to a U.S. Holder as
ordinary income at the time it is received or accrued, depending
on the holders method of accounting for tax purposes.
Interest paid by us on the notes and OID, if any, accrued with
respect to the notes (as described below under Original
Issue Discount) constitutes income from sources outside
the United States. Prospective purchasers should consult their
tax advisers concerning the applicability of the foreign tax
credit and source of income rules to income attributable to the
notes.
Original Issue Discount
General. The amount of a notes OID is the excess of
the notes stated redemption price at maturity over its
issue price. Generally, the issue price of a note will be the
first price at which a substantial amount of notes included in
the issue of which the note is a part is sold to persons other
than bond houses, brokers, or similar persons or organisations
acting in the capacity of underwriters, placement agents, or
wholesalers. If the issue price of the notes is less than the
stated redemption price at maturity and the amount OID is more
than
1/4
of 1 percent of the stated redemption price at maturity
multiplied by the number of complete years to maturity, the
notes will be considered to have been issued with more than a de
minimis amount of OID.
If the notes are issued with more than a de minimis amount of
OID, a U.S. Holder must include a portion of the OID in
gross income as interest in each taxable year or portion thereof
in which the U.S. Holder holds the notes even if the
U.S. Holder has not received a cash payment in respect of
the OID. These U.S. Holders must include OID in income
calculated on a constant-yield method before the receipt of cash
attributable to the income, and generally will have to include
in income increasingly greater amounts of OID over the life of
the notes. The amount of OID includible in income by these
U.S. Holders is the sum of the daily portions of OID with
respect to the note for each day during the taxable year or
portion of the taxable year on which the U.S. Holder holds
the note (accrued OID). The daily portion is
determined by allocating to each day in any accrual
period a pro rata portion of the OID allocable to that
accrual period. Accrual periods with respect to a note may be of
any length selected by the U.S. Holder and may vary in
length over the term of the note as long as (i) no accrual
period is longer than one year; and (ii) each scheduled
payment of interest or principal on the Tack-on Note occurs on
either the final or first day of an accrual period. The amount
of OID allocable to an accrual period equals the excess of
(a) the product of the notes adjusted issue price at
the beginning of the accrual period and the notes yield to
maturity (determined on the basis of compounding at the close of
each accrual period and properly adjusted for the length of the
accrual period) over (b) the sum of the payments of
interest on the note allocable to the accrual period. The
adjusted issue price of a note at the beginning of
any accrual period is the issue price of the note increased by
the amount of accrued OID for each prior accrual period.
Acquisition Premium. A U.S. Holder that purchases a
note for an amount less than or equal to the notes
principal amount but in excess of its adjusted issue price (this
excess being acquisition premium) and that does not
make the election described below under Election to Treat
All Interest as Original Issue Discount is permitted to
reduce the daily portions of OID by a fraction, the numerator of
which is the excess of the
234
U.S. Holders adjusted basis in the note immediately
after its purchase over the notes adjusted issue price,
and the denominator of which is the excess of the notes
principal amount over the notes adjusted issue price.
Market Discount. A note generally will be treated as
purchased at a market discount (a Market Discount
Note) if the notes revised issue price
exceeds the amount for which the U.S. Holder purchased the
note by at least
1/4
of 1 percent of the notes revised issue price,
multiplied by the number of complete years from the date
acquired by the U.S. Holder to the notes maturity. If
this excess is not sufficient to cause the note to be a Market
Discount Note, then the excess constitutes de minimis
market discount. For this purpose, the revised
issue price of a note generally equals its issue price,
increased by the amount of any OID that has accrued on the note.
Any gain recognised on the maturity or disposition of a Market
Discount Note will be treated as ordinary income to the extent
that the gain does not exceed the accrued market discount on the
note. Alternatively, a U.S. Holder of a Market Discount
Note may elect to include market discount in income currently
over the life of the note. This election applies to all debt
instruments with market discount acquired by the electing
U.S. Holder on or after the first day of the first taxable
year for which the election is made. This election may not be
revoked without the consent of the Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS). A U.S. Holder of a Market Discount Note
that does not elect to include market discount in income
currently generally will be required to defer deductions for
interest on borrowings incurred to purchase or carry a Market
Discount Note that is in excess of the interest and OID on the
note includible in the U.S. Holders income, to the
extent that this excess interest expense does not exceed the
portion of the market discount allocable to the days on which
the Market Discount Note was held by the U.S. Holder.
Under current law, market discount on a Market Discount Note
will accrue on a straight-line basis unless the U.S. Holder
elects to accrue the market discount on a constant-yield method.
This election applies only to the Note with respect to which it
is made and is irrevocable.
Pre-Issuance Accrued Interest. If a portion of the
initial purchase price of the note is allocable to interest that
has accrued prior to the issue date and the note provides for a
payment of stated interest within one year from the issue date
in an amount not exceeding the pre-issuance accrued interest, a
U.S. Holder may elect to exclude pre-issuance accrued
interest from the issue price of the note. In that event, a
portion of the first interest payment will be treated as a
nontaxable return of the pre-issuance accrued interest. If a
U.S. Holder does not make this election, the
U.S. federal income tax treatment of any pre-issuance
accrued interest is not entirely clear. U.S. Holders should
consult their tax advisers concerning the U.S. federal
income tax treatment of pre-issuance accrued interest.
Election to Treat All Interest as Original Issue
Discount. A U.S. Holder may generally elect to include
in gross income all interest that accrues on a note using the
constant-yield method described above under Original Issue
Discount General, with certain modifications.
For purposes of this election, interest includes interest,
acquisition discount, OID, de minimis OID, market discount,
de minimis market discount, and unstated interest, as
adjusted by any amortisable bond premium (described below under
Notes Purchased at a Premium) or acquisition
premium. This election generally applies only to the note with
respect to which it is made and may not be revoked without the
consent of the IRS. In the case of a Market Discount Note, a
U.S. Holder may make this election only if the
U.S. Holder is eligible to make the election described
above under Market Discount. If the election to
apply the constant yield method to all interest on a note is
made with respect to a Market Discount Note, the electing
U.S. Holder will be treated as having made the election
described above under Market Discount to include
market discount in income currently over the life of all debt
instruments held or thereafter acquired by the U.S. Holder.
In the case of a note with amortizable bond premium, the
U.S. Holder may make this election only if certain
requirements are met, and certain limitations may apply to such
election. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers
concerning the propriety and consequences of this election.
Notes Purchased at a Premium
A U.S. Holder that purchases a note for an amount in excess
of its principal amount may elect to treat the excess as
amortisable bond premium, in which case the amount
of interest on the note required to be included in the
U.S. Holders income each year will be reduced by the
amount of amortisable bond premium allocable (based on the
notes yield to maturity) to that year. The amount of
amortisable bond premium for each taxable
235
year is the sum of the daily portions of bond premium with
respect to the note for each day during the taxable year or
portion of the taxable year on which the U.S. Holder holds
the note. The daily portion is determined by allocating to each
day in any accrual period a pro rata portion of the
bond premium allocable to that accrual period. Accrual periods
with respect to a note may be of any length selected by the
U.S. Holder and may vary in length over the term of the
note as long as (i) no accrual period is longer than one
year; and (ii) each scheduled payment of interest or
principal on the note occurs on either the final or first day of
an accrual period. The amount of bond premium allocable to an
accrual period equals the excess of (a) the sum of the
payments of interest on the note allocable to the accrual period
over (b) the product of the notes adjusted
acquisition price at the beginning of the accrual period and the
notes yield to maturity (determined on the basis of
compounding at the close of each accrual period and properly
adjusted for the length of the accrual period). The
adjusted acquisition price of a note at the
beginning of any accrual period is the U.S. Holders
purchase price for the note, decreased by the amount of bond
premium for each prior accrual period. Any election to amortise
bond premium applies to all bonds (other than bonds the interest
on which is excludible from gross income for U.S. federal
income tax purposes) held by the U.S. Holder at the
beginning of the first taxable year to which the election
applies or thereafter acquired by the U.S. Holder, and is
irrevocable without the consent of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service.
Purchase, Sale and Retirement of the Notes
A U.S. Holder will generally recognise gain or loss on the
sale or retirement of a note equal to the difference between the
amount realised on the sale or retirement and the tax basis of
the note. The amount realised does not include the amount
attributable to accrued but unpaid interest, which will be
taxable as interest income to the extent not previously included
in income. Except to the extent described under Market
Discount above, gain or loss recognised by a
U.S. Holder on the sale or retirement of a note will be
capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss
if the note was held by the U.S. Holder for more than one
year.
Gain or loss realised by a U.S. Holder on the sale or
retirement of a note generally will be U.S. source.
Prospective purchasers should consult their tax advisers as to
the foreign tax credit implications of the sale or retirement of
notes.
Satisfaction and Discharge
If we were to obtain a discharge of the Indenture with respect
to all of the notes then outstanding, as described in
Description of the Additional Notes
Satisfaction and Discharge, such discharge would generally
be deemed to constitute a taxable exchange of the notes
outstanding for other property. In such case, a U.S. Holder
would be required to recognize capital gain or loss in
connection with such deemed exchange. In addition, after such
deemed exchange, a U.S. Holder might also be required to
recognize income from the property deemed to have been received
in such exchange over the remaining life of the transaction in a
manner or amount that is different than if the discharge had not
occurred. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors as
to the specific consequences arising from a discharge in their
particular situations.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
Payments of principal, interest and accrued OID on, and the
proceeds of sale or other disposition (including exchange) of
notes by a U.S. paying agent or other
U.S. intermediary will be reported to the IRS and to the
U.S. Holder as may be required under applicable
regulations. Backup withholding may apply to these payments and
to accruals of OID if the U.S. Holder fails to provide an
accurate taxpayer identification number or certification of
exempt status or fails to report all interest and dividends
required to be shown on its U.S. federal income tax
returns. Certain U.S. Holders (including, among others,
corporations) are not subject to backup withholding or
information reporting. U.S. Holders should consult their
tax advisers as to their qualification for exemption from backup
withholding or information reporting and the procedure for
obtaining an exemption.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a
payment to a U.S. Holder generally will be allowed as a
refund or a credit against such U.S. Holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the
required procedures are followed.
236
Reportable Transactions
A U.S. taxpayer that participates in a reportable
transaction will be required to disclose its participation
to the IRS. The scope and application of these rules is not
entirely clear. In the event the acquisition, holding or
disposition of notes constitutes participation in a reportable
transaction for purposes of these rules, a U.S. Holder will
be required to disclose its investment by filing Form 8886
with the IRS. Pursuant to U.S. tax legislation enacted in
2004, a penalty in the amount of U.S.$10,000 in the case of a
natural person and U.S.$50,000 in all other cases is generally
imposed on any taxpayer that fails to timely file an information
return with the IRS with respect to a transaction resulting in a
loss in excess of $10 million, in the case of corporations
or partnerships that have only corporations as partners, or
$2 million, in all other cases, in any single taxable year.
Accordingly, if a U.S. Holder realizes a loss on any note
(or, possibly, aggregate losses from the notes) satisfying the
monetary thresholds discussed above, the U.S. Holder could
be required to file an information return with the IRS, and
failure to do so may subject the U.S. Holder to the
penalties described above. In addition, we and our advisers may
also be required to disclose the transaction to the IRS, and to
maintain a list of U.S. Holders, and to furnish this list
and certain other information to the IRS upon written request.
Prospective purchasers are urged to consult their tax advisers
regarding the application of these rules to the acquisition,
holding or disposition of notes.
France
Notes constituting obligations and denominated in
currencies other than euro are deemed to be issued outside the
Republic of France for the purposes of Article 131
quater of the French tax code since we and the guarantors
have agreed not to offer the notes to the public in the Republic
of France and such notes are offered in the Republic of France
through an international syndicate only to qualified investors
(investissuers qualifiés) as described in
Article L. 411-2 of the French Code monétaire et
financier. Consequently, interest and other revenues with
respect to the notes benefit from the exemption, provided for
under Article 131 of quater of the French tax code,
from deduction of the withholding tax set out under
Article 125A III of the French tax code. Accordingly,
such payments do not give the right to any tax credit from any
French source. Prospective purchasers of notes are advised to
consult their own tax advisers concerning the overall tax
consequences of their ownership of notes.
European Savings Tax Directive
On June 3, 2003, the European Council of Economic and
Finance Ministers has adopted a directive 2003/48/ EC regarding
the taxation of savings income (the Directive).
Pursuant to the Directive and subject to a number of conditions
being met, Member States are required, since July 1, 2005,
to provide to the tax authorities of another Member State,
inter alia, details of payments of interest within the
meaning of the Directive (interest, products, premiums or other
debt income) made by a paying agent located within its
jurisdiction to, or for the benefit of, an individual resident
in that other Member State (the Disclosure of Information
Method).
For these purposes, the term paying agent is defined
widely and includes in particular any economic operator who is
responsible for making interest payments, within the meaning of
the Directive, for the immediate benefit of individuals.
However, throughout a transitional period, certain Member States
(the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, Belgium and Austria), instead of
using the Disclosure of Information Method used by other Member
States, withhold an amount on interest payments. The rate of
such withholding tax equals 15% during the first three years,
20% during the subsequent three years and 35% until the end of
the transitional period. Such transitional period will end at
the end of the first full fiscal year following the later of
(i) the date of entry into force of an agreement between
the European Community, following a unanimous decision of the
European Council, and the last of several jurisdictions
(Switzerland, Liechtenstein, San Marino, Monaco and
Andorra), providing for the exchange of information upon request
as defined in the OECD Model Agreement on Exchange Information
on Tax Matters released on April 18, 2002 (the OECD
Model Agreement) with respect to interest payments within
the meaning of the Directive, in addition to the simultaneous
application by those same countries of a withholding tax on such
payments at the rate defined for the corresponding periods and
(ii) date on which the European Council unanimously agrees
that the United States of America is committed to exchange of
237
information upon request as defined in the OECD Model Agreement
with respect to interest payments within the meaning of the
Directive.
A number of non-EU countries and dependent or associated
territories have agreed to adopt similar measures (withholding
tax or exchange of information) with effect since July 1,
2005.
The Directive was implemented into French law under
Article 242 ter of the French tax code, which
imposes on paying agents based in France an obligation to report
to the French tax authorities certain information with respect
to interest payments made to beneficial owners domiciled in
another Member State, including, among other things, the
identity and address of the beneficial owner and a detailed list
of the different categories of interest paid to that beneficial
owner.
Luxembourg
The comments below are intended as a basic summary of certain
tax consequences in relation to the purchase, ownership and
disposition of the Notes under Luxembourg law. Persons who are
in any doubt as to their tax position should consult a
professional tax adviser.
|
|
|
Luxembourg non-residents individuals |
Under Luxembourg tax law currently in effect and subject to the
application of the Luxembourg laws dated June 21, 2005 (the
Laws) implementing the European Council Directive
2003/48/ EC on the taxation of savings income (the Savings
Directive) and several agreements concluded between
Luxembourg and certain associated or dependent territories of
the European Union, there is no withholding tax on payments of
interest (including accrued but unpaid interest) made to
Luxembourg non-resident Noteholders. There is also no Luxembourg
withholding tax, subject to the application of the Laws, upon
repayment of principal or upon redemption, repurchase or
exchange of the Notes.
Under the Savings Directive and the laws, a Luxembourg based
paying agent (within the meaning of the Savings Directive) is
required since July 1, 2005 to withhold tax on interest and
other similar income paid by it to (or under certain
circumstances, to the benefit of) an individual or a residual
entity within the meaning of article 4.2 of the Directive
(i.e. an entity without legal personality and whose profits are
not taxed under the general arrangements for the business
taxation and that is not, or has not opted to be considered as,
a UCITS recognized in accordance with Council
Directive 85/611/EEC resident or established in another
Member State, unless the beneficiary of the interest payments
elects for the exchange of information procedure or for the tax
certificate procedure.
The same regime applies to payments to individuals resident in
certain associated or dependent territories.
The withholding tax rate is initially 15%, increasing steadily
to 20% (as of July 1, 2008) and to 35% (as of July 1,
2011). The withholding tax system will only apply during a
transitional period, the ending of which depends on the
conclusion of certain agreements relating to information
exchange with certain third countries.
|
|
|
Luxembourg residents individuals |
A 10% withholding tax has been introduced, as from
January 1, 2006 on interest payments made by Luxembourg
paying agents (defined in the same way as in the Savings
Directive) to Luxembourg individual residents.
Income (other than interest) from investment funds and from
current accounts provided that the interest rate is not higher
than 0,75% are exempt from the withholding tax. Furthermore,
interest which is accrued once a year on savings accounts (short
and long term) and which does not exceed
250 per
person and per paying agent is exempted from the withholding
tax. This withholding tax represents the final tax liability for
the Luxembourg individual taxpayers receiving the payment in the
course of their private wealth.
There is no withholding tax for Luxembourg resident and
non-resident corporate Noteholders on payments of interest
(including accrued by unpaid interests).
238
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement dated
February ,
2007, we have agreed to sell to the underwriters named below,
for whom Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited is acting as
representative, the following respective principal amounts of
notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal | |
|
Principal | |
|
|
Amount of | |
|
Amount of | |
Underwriter |
|
Additional Notes | |
|
New Notes | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
BNP Paribas Securities Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natexis Bleichroeder Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG Americas Securities, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calyon Securities (USA), Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited will make offers and
sales in the United States through Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, which is acting as selling agent for Credit
Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited.
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are
obligated to purchase all of the notes if any are purchased. The
underwriting agreement also provides that if an underwriter
defaults, the purchase commitments of non-defaulting
underwriters may be increased or the offering may be terminated.
The purchase price for the notes will be the applicable initial
offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus
less an underwriting discount
of %
paid to the underwriters. The underwriters propose to offer the
notes initially at the applicable offering price on the cover
page of this prospectus. After the initial offering, the
respective offering price and other selling terms may be changed.
We estimate that our out of pocket expenses for this offering
will be
2.3 million,
including
200,000 in
accounting fees and expenses,
700,000 in
printing and engraving expenses,
1.2 million
in legal fees and expenses and
200,000 in
miscellaneous expenses.
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or
to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to
make in respect of those liabilities.
We and each of the underwriters have each represented and agreed
that (i) we have not offered or sold and will not offer or
sell, directly or indirectly, any notes to the public in France,
and (ii) offers and sales of notes in France will be made
only to qualified investors in accordance with
Articles 411-2 and
D.411-1 of the French Code Monétaire et Financier,
as amended. In addition, we and each of the underwriters
have each represented and agreed that it has not distributed or
caused to be distributed and will not distribute or cause to be
distributed in France, the prospectus or any other offering
material relating to the notes other than to investors to whom
offers and sales of notes in France may be made as described
above.
We have applied to admit the notes to listing on the Official
List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and to trading on the Euro
MTF, but there can be no assurance that the notes will be
approved for listing or that such listing will be maintained.
The underwriters have advised us that they intend to continue to
make a market in the notes as permitted by applicable law. They
are not obliged, however, to make a market in the notes, and any
market-making may be discontinued at any time at their sole
discretion. Accordingly we can give no assurance as to the
development or liquidity of any market for the notes.
Each underwriter has represented, warranted and agreed that:
|
|
|
|
|
it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will
only communicate or cause to be communicated any invitation or
inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning
of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (the FSMA)) received by it in connection |
239
|
|
|
|
|
with the issue or sale of any notes in circumstances in which
section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to CGG or the
guarantors; and |
|
|
|
it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions
of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to
the notes in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom. |
We have agreed not to offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or
otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file with the
Commission a registration statement under the Securities Act
relating to, any debt securities issued or guaranteed by us and
having a maturity of more than one year from the date of issue,
or any options or derivatives in respect of such debt
securities, or publicly disclose the intention to make any such
offer, sale, pledge, disposition or filing, without the prior
written consent of Credit Suisse for a period of 90 days
after the date of the settlement date for the notes; provided
that this provision shall not prohibit borrowings under the
credit facilities existing on the date hereof or secured
financings of accounts receivables and inventory.
We expect that delivery of the notes will be made against
payment therefor on or about the fifth business day following
the date of pricing of the notes (this settlement cycle being
referred to as T+5). Under
Rule 15c6-1 of the
U.S. Exchange Act, trades in the secondary market generally
are required to settle in three business days, unless the
parties to any such trade expressly agree otherwise.
Accordingly, purchasers who wish to trade notes on the date of
this prospectus or the next succeeding two business days will be
required, by virtue of the fact that the notes initially will
settle in T+5, to specify an alternate settlement cycle at the
time of any such trade to prevent a failed settlement.
Purchasers of the notes who wish to make such trades should
consult their own adviser.
Certain of the underwriters (and/or certain of their affiliates)
have performed and in the future may perform services, including
commercial banking, investment banking, advisory and/or
consulting services, for us in the ordinary course of business,
for which they have received or will receive customary
compensation. The underwriters may, from time to time, continue
to engage in transactions with and perform services for us in
the ordinary course of business, for which they will receive
customary compensation. The underwriters may have held and in
the future may hold our securities for investment purposes in
the ordinary course of their business.
An affiliate of each of Credit Suisse Securities (Europe)
Limited and BNP Paribas Securities Corp. was an arranger,
original lender, agent and security agent, as applicable, under
CGGs $375 million bridge loan facility for the
acquisition of Exploration Resources. An affiliate of each of
Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited and BNP Paribas
Securities Corp. was an initial purchaser of CGGs existing
notes and underwriter of CGGs share capital increase by
way of preferential subscription rights in December 2005. An
affiliate of Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited is the
sole and exclusive lead arranger, agent, security agent and sole
and exclusive bookrunner of the bridge loan facility and an
affiliate of Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) limited is
administrative agent, collateral agent, sole bookrunner and
joint lead arranger of the senior facilities. An affiliate of
Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited was the financial
advisor to CGG in connection with the Veritas merger, and
received customary fees in connection therewith. In addition, an
affiliate of Credit Suisse is expected to be collateral agent
under the French revolving facility.
An affiliate of each of BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Calyon
Securities (USA), Inc., Natexis Bleichroeder Inc. and SG
Americas Securities, LLC is a lender under the bridge loan
facility and acted as co-arranger of the senior facilities. In
addition, it is expected that an affiliate of each of BNP
Paribas Securities Corp., Calyon Securities (USA), Inc., Natexis
Bleichroeder Inc. and SG Americas Securities, LLC will be a
lender under the French revolving facility. An affiliate of
Natexis Bleichroeder Inc. is expected to be the agent under the
French revolving facility.
We intend to use the proceeds of this offering, together with
cash on hand, to repay all amounts outstanding under the bridge
loan facility.
Qualified Independent Underwriter
The proceeds from this offering will be used to repay
indebtedness owed to the underwriters or their affiliates. As
more than 10% of the proceeds will be used to repay such
indebtedness, the offering will be conducted in conformity with
Rule 2710(h)(2) of the conduct rules of the National
Association of Securities
240
Dealers, Inc. Under this rule, the yields of the notes offered
hereby can be no lower than that recommended by a
qualified independent underwriter meeting certain
standards. BNP Paribas Securities Corp. is assuming the
responsibilities of acting as the qualified independent
underwriter in pricing this offering and conducting due
diligence. The respective yields of the notes offered hereby
will be no higher than the yields recommended by BNP Paribas
Securities Corp., which will not receive any additional
compensation in connection with its acting as a qualified
independent underwriter.
The underwriters may engage in over-allotment, stabilizing
transactions, covering transactions and penalty bids in
accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment involves sales in excess of the offering size,
which creates a short position for the underwriters. |
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum. |
|
|
|
Covering transactions involve purchases of the notes in the open
market after the distribution has been completed in order to
cover short positions. |
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling
concession from a broker/ dealer when the notes originally sold
by such broker/ dealer are purchased in a stabilizing or
covering transaction to cover short positions. |
These stabilizing transactions, covering transactions and
penalty bids may cause the price of the notes to be higher than
it would otherwise be in the absence of these transactions.
These transactions, if commenced, may be discontinued at any
time.
Persons who purchase notes from the underwriters may be required
to pay stamp duty, taxes and other charges in accordance with
the law and practice of the country of purchase in addition to
the offering price set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus.
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a
Relevant Member State), each purchaser represents,
warrants and agrees that with effect from and including the date
on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that
Relevant Member State (the Relevant Implementation
Date) it has not made and will not make an offer of notes
to the public in that Relevant Member State prior to the
publication of a prospectus in relation to the notes which has
been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member
State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member
State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant
Member State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive,
except that it may, with effect from and including the Relevant
Implementation Date, make an offer of notes to the public in
that Relevant Member State at any time:
|
|
|
|
|
to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to operate
in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated,
whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities; |
|
|
|
to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year;
(2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than
50,000,000, as
shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts; |
|
|
|
to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified
investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive) subject to
obtaining the prior consent of the underwriters for any such
offer; or |
|
|
|
in any other circumstances which do not require the publication
by CGGVeritas of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the
Prospectus Directive. |
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of notes to the public in relation to any
notes in any Relevant Member State means the communication in
any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms
of the offer and the notes to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase the notes, as the same may be
varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the
Prospectus Directive in that Member
241
State and the expression Prospectus Directive means
Directive 2003/71/ EC and includes any relevant implementing
measure in each Relevant Member State.
Selling Restrictions
The notes are subject to restrictions on transfer as summarized
below.
The notes have not been and will not be offered or sold to the
public in France (appel public à
lépargne), and no offering or marketing materials
relating to the notes must be made available or distributed in
any way that would constitute, directly or indirectly, an offer
to the public in the Republic of France.
The notes may only be offered or sold in the Republic of France
to qualified investors (investisseurs qualifiés) as
defined in and in accordance with articles
L.411-2 and
D.411-1 of the French
Code monétaire et financier.
Prospective investors are informed that:
(a) this prospectus has not been submitted for clearance to
the French financial market authority (Autorité des
Marchés Financiers);
(b) in compliance with article D.411-1 of the French
Code monétaire and financier any investors
subscribing for the notes should be acting for their own account;
the direct and indirect distribution or sale to the public of
the notes acquired by them may only be made in compliance with
articles L.411-1, L.411-2, L.412-1 and L.621-8 of the French
Code monétaire et financier.
The notes will not be offered, sold or publicly promoted or
advertised in the Federal Republic of Germany other than in
compliance with the German Securities Prospectus Act (Gesetz
über die Erstellung, Billigung und Veröffentlichung
des Prospekts, der beim öffentlicken Angebot von
Wertpapieren oder bei der Zulassung von Wertpapieren zum Handel
an einem organisierten Markt zu veröffenlichen
ist Wertpapierprospektgesetz) as at
June 22, 2005, effective as at July 1, 2005 as
amended, or any other laws and regulations applicable in the
Federal Republic of Germany governing the issue, offering and
sale of securities. No selling prospectus
(Verkaufsprospekt) within the meaning of the German
Securities Selling Prospectus Act has been or will be registered
within the Financial Supervisory Authority of the Federal
Republic of Germany or otherwise published in Germany.
Neither the notes, this prospectus nor any other material
relating to the notes will be offered, sold, delivered,
distributed or made available in the Republic of Italy other
than to professional investors (investitori
professionali) as defined in article 30,
paragraph 2, of Legislative Decree No. 58 of
February 24, 1998 (the Financial Laws Consolidation
Act), as subsequently amended and supplemented, which
refers to the definition of operatori
qualificati as defined in article 31,
paragraph 2, of CONSOB Regulation No. 11522 of
July 1, 1998, as subsequently amended and supplemented, or
pursuant to article 100 of the Financial Laws Consolidation and
article 33, paragraph 1, of CONSOB Regulation n. 11971 of
May 14, 1999, as subsequently amended and supplemented and
in accordance with applicable Italian laws and regulations.
Any offer of the notes of the relevant class or classes to
professional investors in the Republic of Italy shall be made
only by banks, investment firms or financial companies enrolled
in the special register provided for in Article 107 of the
Consolidated Banking Act, to the extent that they are duly
authorized to engage in the placement and/or underwriting of
financial instruments in the Republic of Italy in accordance
with the relevant provisions of the Financial Laws Consolidation
Act and/or any other applicable laws and regulations and in
compliance with Article 129 of the Consolidated Banking Act.
242
Insofar as the requirements above are based on laws which are
superseded at any time pursuant to the implementation of the
Directive 2003/71/ CE (Prospectus Directive), such
requirements shall be replaced by the applicable requirements
under the Prospectus Directive.
The notes may not be offered or sold to persons in the United
Kingdom except to persons who are authorized and regulated by
the Financial Services Authority or to persons who have
professional experience in matters of investment within the
meaning of article 19 of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2001 (the Order).
This prospectus and any other communication in connection with
the offering and issuance of the notes is intended for and
directed at and may only be issued or passed on to a person
authorized and regulated by the Finance Services Authority or to
a person of a kind described in either Article 19 or
Article 49(2) of the Order or a person to whom this
prospectus or any other such communication may otherwise
lawfully be issued or passed on (all such persons together being
referred to as relevant persons). This communication
must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not
relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which
this communication relates is available only to relevant persons
and will be engaged in only with relevant persons.
This prospectus has not been filed with or approved by any
authority in the Kingdom of Denmark. The notes have not been
offered or sold and may not be offered, sold or delivered
directly or indirectly in the Kingdom of Denmark, unless in
compliance with the Danish Act on Trading in Securities and the
Danish Executive Order No. 166 of March 13, 2003 on
the First Public Offer of Certain Securities issued pursuant
hereto as amended from time to time.
This prospectus has not been approved or registered with any
authority in Norway. Accordingly, the notes have not been
offered or sold, and will not be offered or sold, to any persons
in Norway in any way that would constitute an offer to the
public other than to persons who invest in securities as part of
their professional activity and who are registered with the Oslo
Stock Exchange in this capacity, or otherwise only in
circumstances where an exemption from the duty to publish a
prospectus under the Norwegian Securities Trading Act 1997 shall
be applicable.
This prospectus has neither been approved nor filed with any
Finnish authority AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PROSPECTUS UNDER THE
FINNISH SECURITIES MARKET ACT and it is only being distributed
to a limited number of pre-selected professional investors in
circumstances where the offer of notes in connection with this
document does not constitute a public offer as defined in the
Securities Market Act of the Republic of Finland. The notes may
not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to any resident
of the Republic of Finland or in the Republic of Finland, except
pursuant to applicable Finnish law and regulations.
Specifically, the notes may not be offered or sold, directly or
indirectly, to the public in the Republic of Finland.
This document has not and will not be registered with the
Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority. Accordingly, this
document may not be made available, nor may the notes otherwise
be marketed and offered for sale, in Sweden other than in
circumstances which are deemed not to be an offer to the public
in Sweden under the Financial Instruments Trading Act (1991:980).
Each of the underwriters represents and agrees that (a) it
is a professional market party (PMP) within the
meaning of Section 1(e) of the Exemption Regulation of
June 26, 2002 in respect of the Act on the Supervision of
243
the Credit System 1992 (Vrijstellingsregeling Wet toezicht
kredietwezen 1992), as amended from time to time (the
Exemption Regulation), where applicable read in
conjunction with the policy rules of the Dutch Central Bank (de
Nederlandsche Bank N.V.) on key concepts of market access and
enforcement of the Act on the Supervision of the Credit System
1992 (Wet toezicht kredietwezen 1992) published on
December 29, 2004 (Beleidsregel 2005 kernbegrippen
markttoetreding en handhaving Wtk 1992) (the Policy
Rules), and Section 2 of the Policy Rules, as
amended, supplemented and restated from time to time and
(b) it has offered or sold and will offer or sell, directly
or indirectly, as part of the initial distribution or at any
time thereafter, the notes exclusively (i) to PMPs as
reasonably identified by us on the Closing Date or (ii) to
persons which cannot reasonably be identified as PMPs by us on
the Closing Date, provided that the notes have a denomination of
100,000 (or the
equivalent in any other currency) and shall upon their issuance
be included in a clearing institution that is established in an
EU Member State, the United States of America, Japan, Australia,
Canada or Switzerland, so that it can reasonably be expected
that the underwriters will transfer the notes exclusively to
other PMPs.
The notes have not been and will not be publicly offered in
Belgium. The offering is exclusively conducted under applicable
private placement exemptions and therefore it has not been and
will not be notified to, and the prospectus or any other
offering material relating to the notes has not been and will
not be approved by, the Belgian Banking Finance and Insurance
Commission (Commission Bancaire, Financière et des
Assurances/ Commissie voor het Bank-, Financie-en
Assurantiewezen). Accordingly, the offering may not be
advertised and each of the underwriters has represented,
warranted and agreed that it has not offered, sold or resold,
transferred or delivered, and will not offer, sell, resell,
transfer or deliver, the notes and that it has not distributed,
and will not distribute, any memorandum, information circular,
brochure or any similar documents, directly or indirectly, to
any individual or legal entity in Belgium other than:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
investors required to invest a minimum of
250,000 (per
investor and per transaction); or |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
institutional investors as defined in Article 3, 27,
of the Belgian Royal Decree of July 7, 1999 on the public
character of financial transactions, acting for their own
account. |
This prospectus has been issued only for the personal use of the
above qualified investors and exclusively for the purpose of the
offering of the notes. Accordingly, the information contained
therein may not be used for any other purpose nor disclosed to
any other person in Belgium.
The notes may be offered and sold in Austria only in accordance
with the provisions of the Banking Act, the Securities
Supervision Act of Austria (Bankwesengesetz and
Wertpapieraufsichtsgesetz) and any other applicable Austrian
law. The notes have not been admitted to public offer in Austria
under the provisions of the Capital Markets Act or the
Investment Fund Act or the Exchange Act
(Kapitalmartgesetz, Investmentfondsgesetz or
Börsengesetz). Consequently, in Austria, the notes may
not be offered or sold directly or indirectly by way of a public
offering in Austria and will only be available to a limited
group of persons within the scope of their professional
activities.
The notes may be offered in Switzerland on the basis of a
private placement, not as a public offering. The notes will
neither be listed on the SWX Swiss Exchange nor are they subject
to Swiss law. This prospectus therefore neither constitutes a
prospectus within the meaning of Art. 1156 of the Swiss Federal
Code of Obligations or Arts. 32 et seq. of the Listing
Rules of the SWX Swiss Exchange, nor does it comply with the
Directive for Notes of Foreign Borrowers of the Swiss Bankers
Association.
Other than the approval by the IFSRA of this prospectus as a
prospectus in accordance with the requirements of the Prospectus
Directive and implementing measures in Ireland, no action has
been or will be taken to permit a
244
public offering of the notes or the distribution of this
prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is
required. The distribution of this prospectus and the offering
of the notes in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law.
Persons into whose possession this prospectus (or any part
hereof) comes are required by us and the underwriters to inform
themselves about, and to observe, any such restrictions. Neither
this prospectus nor any part hereof constitutes an offer of, or
an invitation by or on behalf of us or the underwriters to
subscribe for or purchase any of, the notes and neither this
prospectus, nor any part hereof, may be used for or in
connection with an offer to, or solicitation by, any person in
any jurisdiction or in any circumstances in which such offer or
solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it is
unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.
Neither the notes nor this prospectus have been approved or
registered in the administrative registries of the Spanish
Securities Markets Commission (Comisión Nacional del
Mercado de Valores). Accordingly, the notes may not be
offered in Spain except in circumstances which do not constitute
a public offer of securities in Spain within the meaning of
article 30bis of the Spanish Securities Market Law of
July 28, 1988 (Ley 24/1988, de 28 de julio, del
Mercado de Valores), as amended and restated, and
supplemental rules enacted thereunder.
Each underwriter represents, warrants and agrees that
(i) it has not directly or indirectly taken any action or
offered, advertised, sold or delivered and will not directly or
indirectly offer, advertise, sell, re-sell, re-offer, or deliver
any notes in circumstances which could qualify as a public offer
pursuant to the Código dos Valores Mobiliários or in
circumstances which could qualify the issue of the notes as an
issue in the Portuguese market, and (ii) it has not
directly or indirectly distributed and will not directly or
indirectly distribute the prospectus, any other document,
circular, advertisement or any offering material except in
accordance with applicable law and regulations.
No public offering of the Notes is permitted in the Hellenic
Republic without the issuance and publication of a prospectus
approved by the Capital Market Committee and consequently no
advertisement of any kind, notifications, statements or other
actions are permitted to be taken in the Hellenic Republic with
a view to attracting the public in Greece to acquire any of the
Notes. All provisions of codified law 2190/1920, law 876/1979
and presidential decree 52/1992 must be complied with in respect
of anything done in relation to the public offering of the Notes
in, from or otherwise involving the Hellenic Republic. In
accordance with Article 4 of presidential decree 52/1992,
the above approval procedure is not required if the Notes are to
be offered in the Hellenic Republic only to a restricted number
of investors and/or persons engaged professionally in the
investment business.
The distribution of the notes in Canada is being made only on a
private placement basis, exempt from the requirement that we
prepare and file a prospectus with the securities regulatory
authorities in each province where trades of the notes are
effected. Accordingly, all offers, sales and resales of the
notes in Canada must be made in accordance with applicable
securities laws which will vary depending on the relevant
jurisdiction, and which may require such offers, sales and
resales to be made in accordance with available statutory
exemptions or pursuant to a discretionary exemption granted by
the applicable Canadian securities regulatory authority.
Investors are advised to seek legal advice prior to any offer,
sale or resale of the notes.
Each purchaser of the notes in Canada who receives a purchase
confirmation will be deemed to represent to us, the underwriter
and the dealer from whom such purchase confirmation is received
that:
|
|
|
|
|
such purchaser is entitled under applicable provincial
securities laws to purchase such Notes without the benefit of a
prospectus qualified under such securities laws; |
|
|
|
where required by law, that such purchaser is purchasing as
principal and not as agent; and |
245
|
|
|
|
|
such purchaser has reviewed the text in the preceding paragraph. |
Under Ontario securities legislation, a purchaser who purchases
a security offered by this prospectus during the period of
distribution will have a statutory right of action for damages,
or while still the owner of the notes, for rescission against us
in the event that this prospectus contains a misrepresentation.
A purchaser will be deemed to have relied on the
misrepresentation. The right of action for damages is
exercisable not later than the earlier of 180 days from the
date the purchaser first had knowledge of the facts giving rise
to the cause of action and three years from the date on which
payment is made for the notes. The right of action for
rescission is exercisable not later than 180 days from the
date on which payment is made for the notes. If a purchaser
elects to exercise the right of action for rescission, the
purchaser will have no right of action for damages against us.
In no case will the amount recoverable in any action exceed the
price at which the notes were offered to the purchaser and if
the purchaser is shown to have purchased the securities with
knowledge of the misrepresentation, we will have no liability.
In the case of an action for damages, we will not be liable for
all or any portion of the damages that are proven not to
represent the depreciation in value of the notes as a result of
the misrepresentation relied upon. These rights are in addition
to, and without derogation from, any other rights or remedies
available at law to an Ontario purchaser. The foregoing is a
summary of the rights available to an Ontario purchaser. Ontario
purchasers should refer to the complete text of the relevant
statutory provisions.
All of our directors and senior executives, as well as our
auditors, are located outside of Canada and, as a result, it may
not be possible for Canadian subscribers to effect service of
process within Canada upon us or such persons. All of our
assets, and the assets of such persons, are located outside of
Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible to satisfy a
judgment against us or such persons in Canada. In addition, it
may not be possible to enforce a judgment obtained in Canadian
courts against us or such persons outside of Canada.
A purchaser of notes to whom the Securities Act (British
Columbia) applies is advised that such purchaser is required to
file with the British Columbia Securities Commission a report
within 10 days of the sale of any notes acquired by such
purchaser pursuant to this offering. Such report must be in the
form attached to British Columbia Securities Commission Blanket
Order BOR #95/17, a copy of which may be obtained from us.
Only one such report must be filed in respect of notes acquired
on the same date and under the same prospectus exemption.
Canadian subscribers of notes should consult their own legal and
tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of an
investment in the notes in their particular circumstances and
with respect to the eligibility of the notes for investment by
the purchaser under relevant Canadian legislation.
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that (i) it has
not offered or sold and will not offer or sell in Hong Kong, by
means of any document, any notes other than (a) to
professional investors as defined in the Securities
and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) of Hong Kong and any rules made
under that Ordinance; or (b) in other circumstances which
do not result in the document being a prospectus as
defined in the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) of Hong Kong
or which do not constitute an offer to the public within the
meaning of that Ordinance; and (ii) it has not issued or
had in its possession for the purposes of issue, and will not
issue or have in its possession for the purposes of issue,
whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere, any advertisement, invitation
or document relating to the notes, which is directed at, or the
contents of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the
public of Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the
securities laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to notes
which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons
outside Hong Kong or only to professional investors
as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance and any rules
made under that Ordinance.
This prospectus has not been and will not be registered as a
prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Accordingly, no notes have been nor will be offered or sold or
made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase,
nor has or will this prospectus or any other offering document
or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation
for subscription or purchase of such notes be distributed or
circulated, whether directly or indirectly, to the public or any
member of the public in Singapore other than (a) to an
institutional
246
investor specified in Section 274 of the Securities and
Futures Act Chapter 289 of Singapore (the SFA),
(b) to a sophisticated investor, and in accordance with the
conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA or
(c) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the
conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.
No prospectus or other offering document has been or will be
registered with the Securities Commission under the Securities
Commission Act 1993 in respect of the notes. Consequently, the
notes may only be offered for sale to non-residents of Malaysia
(being persons who are not citizens or permanent residents of
Malaysia and who do not engage in a trade or business in
Malaysia and includes any offshore company incorporated under
the OCA 1990 and any foreign offshore company registered under
the OCA 1990). This prospectus or any other offering document or
material relating to the notes will not be distributed or
circulated, whether directly or indirectly, to residents of
Malaysia.
247
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain legal matters in connection with the validity of the
notes will be passed on for us by Linklaters, Paris, France, who
are acting as our special United States counsel and our French
legal advisors. The underwriters have been represented by
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, London, United Kingdom.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of CGG as at and for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 included in this
prospectus have been audited by Barbier Frinault &
Autres, Ernst & Young and Mazars &
Guérard, independent registered public accounting firms, as
set forth in their report thereon appearing herein.
The financial statements of Veritas DGC Inc. as at
July 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the years ended
July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 included in this prospectus
have been so included in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of Exploration Resources
ASA as at and for the year ended December 31, 2004 included
in this prospectus have been audited by Ernst & Young
AS, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth
in their report thereon appearing herein.
The consolidated financial statements of Arabian Geophysical and
Surveying Company as at and for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 included in this
prospectus have been audited by Ernst & Young,
independent public accounting firm, as set forth in their report
thereon appearing herein.
SERVICE OF PROCESS AND ENFORCEMENT OF LIABILITIES
We are a company organized under the laws of France with our
registered office and principal place of business in France. A
majority of our directors and officers named herein are not
residents of the United States, and all or a substantial portion
of their assets are located outside the United States.
Substantially all of our assets are located outside the United
States. We have agreed, in accordance with the terms of the
indenture, to accept service of process in any suit, action or
proceeding with respect to the indenture or the notes brought in
any federal or state court located in New York City by an agent
designated for such purpose, and to submit to the jurisdiction
of such courts in connection with such suits, actions or
proceedings. However, it may not be possible for you to effect
service of process within the United States upon our directors
and officers or to enforce against these persons, or us,
judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil
liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the
United States.
We have been advised by our French counsel, Linklaters, Paris,
France, that if an original action is brought in France,
predicated solely upon the United States federal securities
laws, French courts may not have the requisite jurisdiction to
grant the remedies sought and that actions for enforcement in
France of a judgment by courts in the United States exequator
proceeding before the relevant civil court (Tribunal de
Grande Instance), rendered against any of the French persons
referred to in the second sentence of the preceding paragraph,
would require such French person to waive their rights under
Article 15 of the French Civil Code to be sued in France
only. We believe that no such French person has waived such
right with respect to actions predicated solely upon the United
States federal securities laws. In addition, actions in the
United States under United States federal securities laws could
be affected under certain circumstances by the French Law of
July 16, 1980, which may preclude or restrict the obtaining
of evidence in France or from French persons in connection with
such actions.
248
GENERAL INFORMATION
Share Capital
As at December 31, 2006, CGG had authorized share capital
of 64,701,273
and issued share capital of
35,195,776,
divided into 17,597,888 ordinary shares of
2 nominal value
each. As at December 31, 2005, CGG had authorized share
capital of
57,877,671 and
issued and fully
paid-up share capital
of 34,163,360,
divided into 17,081,680 ordinary shares of
2 nominal value
each, all of which were fully paid.
In connection with the merger, CGG issued
9,215,845 ordinary shares which were deposited with The
Bank of New York as ADS depository, which issued
46,054,225 ADSs to be paid as merger consideration to
former holders of Veritas common stock in the merger. As at
January 24, 2007, CGGVeritas had 26,813,733 ordinary shares
issued and outstanding, of which 6,650,443 were represented
by 33,252,215 ADSs.
Corporate Authorizations
The issue of the notes was authorized pursuant to a resolution
of the Board of Directors (Conseil dAdministration)
of CGG adopted on January 26, 2007. The guarantee of the
notes was authorized by the Board of Directors of each Initial
Guarantor.
Listing of the Notes
Application has been made to admit the additional notes and the
new notes to listing on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and to
trading on the Euro MTF.
Clearing of the Notes
The additional notes have been accepted for clearance with the
following securities codes: a CUSIP number of 204386 AF 3,
a Common Code of 023143186 and an ISIN of US204386AF39.
The new notes have been accepted for clearance with the
following securities codes: a CUSIP number
of ,
a Common Code
of and
an ISIN
of .
No Material Adverse Change
Except as disclosed in this prospectus, there has been no
significant change in the financial or trading position of
CGGVeritas since December 31, 2005 or July 31, 2006
and no material adverse change in the financial position or
prospects of CGGVeritas since December 31, 2005 or
July 31, 2006.
Litigation
Except as disclosed in this prospectus, neither CGGVeritas nor
any of its subsidiaries is involved in any litigation,
arbitration or administrative proceedings relating to amounts
which, individually or in the aggregate, are material in the
context of the issue of the notes and, to the best of the
knowledge of CGGVeritas, there are no such litigation,
arbitration or administrative proceedings pending or threatened.
Significant Subsidiaries
For the year ended December 31, 2005, one subsidiary of
CGG, Sercel S.A., represented more than 10% of consolidated
revenues of CGG. Sercel S.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Sercel Holding S.A., had operating revenues of
303.7 million
in the year ended December 31, 2005 and had
shareholders equity of
99.4 million
as at December 31, 2005. Sercel S.A. paid a dividend of
0.1 million
to CGG in 2005. Sercel S.A.s registered office is
at 16, rue de Bel Air, 44470 Carquefou, France.
As at December 31, 2005, two subsidiaries of CGG, CGG
Services SA and CGG Americas, Inc., each represented more than
10% of consolidated assets of CGG.
249
CGG Services SA (formerly CGG Marine SAS), a wholly owned
subsidiary of CGG, had operating revenues of
150.2 million
in the year ended December 31, 2005 and had
shareholders equity of
42.3 million
as at December 31, 2005. CGG Services SA did not pay any
dividends to CGG in 2005. CGG Services registered office
is at 1, rue Léon Migaux, 91300 Massy, France.
CGG Americas, Inc. is described below under the heading
Initial Guarantors.
CGG Americas, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of CGG, is
primarily engaged in the production and sale of our multi-client
data library in the Gulf of Mexico and the processing of data
for clients in the United States. CGG Americas, Inc. had
operating revenues of
113.1 million
in the year ended December 31, 2005 and had
shareholders equity of
95.4 million
as at December 31, 2005. CGG Americas, Inc. did not pay any
dividends to CGG in 2005. CGG Americas, Inc.s registered
office is at 16430 Park Ten Place, Houston, Texas 77084,
United States of America.
CGG Canada Services Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of CGG, is
primarily engaged in the processing of seismic data in our
Calgary centre. CGG Canada Services had operating revenues of
2.9 million
in the year ended December 31, 2005 and had
shareholders equity of
1.5 million
as at December 31, 2005. CGG Canada Services
registered office is at 450, 808-4th avenue Southwest, SW,
Calgary ABTP3E8, Canada.
CGG Marine Resources Norge A/ S, a wholly owned subsidiary of
CGG, is the owner of the CGG Amadeus and CGG Symphony
seismic vessels. CGG Marine Resources Norge A/ S had
operating revenues of
45.0 million
in the year ended December 31, 2005 and had
shareholders equity of
59.4 million
as at December 31, 2005. CGG Marine Resources Norge A/
Ss registered office is at OH BANGS VEI 70, 1363 Hovik,
Norway.
Sercel Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Sercel Holding S.A.,
is primarily engaged in the production and distribution of
marine seismic equipment, geophones and other products. Sercel
Inc. had operating revenues of
116.5 million
in the year ended December 31, 2005 and had
shareholders equity of
115.0 million
as at December 31, 2005. Sercel Inc.s registered
office is at 17200 Park Row, Houston, Texas 77084, United States
of America.
Sercel Australia Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sercel
Holding S.A., is primarily engaged in the production and
distribution of marine seismic products. Sercel Australia had
operating revenues of
14.4 million
in the year ended December 31, 2005 and had
shareholders equity of
19.4 million
as at December 31, 2005. Sercel Australias registered
office is at 274 Victoria Road, Rydalmere, New South Wales,
Australia.
Sercel Canada Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sercel Inc., is
primarily engaged in the rental and sale of products for the
geophysical land market. Sercel Canada has operating revenues of
15.7 million
in the year ended December 31, 2005 and had
shareholders equity of
7.8 million
as at December 31, 2005. Sercel Canadas registered
office is at 1108 55th Avenue NE, Calgary, Alberta, T2E 6Y,
Canada.
CGGVeritas Services Inc. had consolidated operating revenues of
$822.2 million in the year ended July 31, 2006 and had
consolidated shareholders equity of $710.5 million as
at July 31, 2006. CGGVeritas Services Inc.s
registered office is at 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington,
Delaware, 19801, United States of America. Veritas DGC Inc., the
predecessor of CGGVeritas Services Inc., was incorporated under
Delaware law on June 21,1991.
Veritas DGC Land Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Veritas, is
primarily engaged in acquiring seismic data on land in the U.S.
for third parties on a contract basis and acquiring and
licensing U.S. land multi-client library data. Veritas DGC Land
Inc. had operating revenues of $142.1 million in the year
ended July 31, 2006 and had shareholders equity of
$20.0 million as at July 31, 2006. Veritas DGC Land
Inc.s registered office is at 1209 Orange Street,
Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, United States of America.
Veritas Geophysical Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Veritas, is primarily engaged in acquiring marine seismic data
in U.S. waters for third parties on a contract basis, acquiring,
processing and licensing marine multi-client library data, and
processing seismic data for third parties. Veritas Geophysical
Corporation had operating revenues of $208.9 million in the
year ended July 31, 2006 and had shareholders equity
of
250
$132.5 million as at July 31, 2006. Veritas
Geophysical Corporations registered office is at
1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, United
States of America.
Veritas Investments Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Veritas,
is primarily engaged in a holding company that owns the stock in
Veritas Norwegian and Mexican subsidiaries. Veritas
Investments Inc. had no operating revenues in the year ended
July 31, 2006 and had shareholders equity of
$(2.0) million as at July 31, 2006. Veritas
Investments Inc.s registered office is at 1209 Orange
Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, United States of America.
Viking Maritime Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Veritas, is
primarily engaged in chartering, as charterer, and operating
seismic and support vessels. Viking Maritime Inc. had operating
revenues of $26.0 million in the year ended July 31,
2006 and had shareholders equity of $30.0 million as
at July 31, 2006. Viking Maritime Inc.s registered
office is at 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware,
19801, United States of America.
Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Veritas, is primarily engaged in a holding company that owns,
together with Veritas Investments Inc., Veritas three
Mexican subsidiaries. Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC had no
operating revenues in the year ended July 31, 2006 and no
shareholders equity as at July 31, 2006. Veritas
Geophysical (Mexico) LLCs registered office is at
1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, United
States of America.
Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Veritas, is primarily engaged in a holding company that owns all
of the shares of Veritas Singapore subsidiary. Veritas DGC
Asia Pacific Ltd had operating revenues of $7.0 million in
the year ended July 31, 2006 and had shareholders
equity of $(2.4) million as at July 31, 2006. Veritas
DGC Asia Pacific Ltds registered office is at
1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, United
States of America.
Alitheia Resources Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Veritas,
is primarily engaged in acquiring, exploring and marketing oil
and gas properties in the Gulf of Mexico. Alitheia Resources
Inc. had operating revenues of $0.2 million in the year
ended July 31, 2006 and had shareholders equity of
$(1.6) million as at July 31, 2006. Alitheia Resources
Inc.s registered office is at 1209 Orange Street,
Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, United States of America.
For more information on the Initial Guarantors, see
Note 31D to the CGG consolidated annual financial
statements, Note 4 to the CGG consolidated interim financial
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
Note 16 to the Veritas consolidated annual financial
statements and Note 11 to the Veritas consolidated interim
financial statements for the three months ended
October 31, 2006, all included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Copies of the annual reports of CGG for 2003, 2004 and 2005,
annual reports of Veritas for fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006,
the constitutive documents of CGGVeritas, the indenture and
copies of the most recently published report and consolidated
and non-consolidated financial statements of CGG, Veritas or
CGGVeritas will, for so long as the notes are listed on the
Luxembourg Stock Exchange, be available free of charge during
usual business hours on any weekday (except Saturdays, Sundays
and public holidays) at the specified offices of the Paying
Agent in Luxembourg. We publish a semi-annual consolidated
statement of operations, statement of cash flow and balance
sheet, each of which will be delivered to, and copies of which
may be obtained free of charge from, the specified offices of
the Paying Agent in Luxembourg. We do not publish interim
non-consolidated statements. All published interim statements
are unaudited.
We have undertaken to the holders of the notes that we will
submit certain quarterly financial information to the
Commission. Any such quarterly information will also be
delivered to, and copies of such information may be obtained
free of charge from, the specified offices of the Paying Agent
in Luxembourg.
251
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Unaudited Interim Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements of
CGG
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets as at
September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
nine months and the three months ended September 30, 2006
and 2005
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Shareholders Equity during the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
Annual Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements of CGG
|
|
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
|
|
|
F-19 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-20 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-21 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-22 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-23 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-25 |
|
Annual Financial Statements of Exploration Resources ASA
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-87 |
|
Combined Balance Sheet as at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-88 |
|
Combined Statement of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-89 |
|
Combined Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-90 |
|
Combined Statement of Owners Net Investment for the year
ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-91 |
|
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-92 |
|
Annual Financial Statements of Argas
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-113 |
|
Balance Sheet as at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-114 |
|
Income Statement for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-115 |
|
Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-116 |
|
Statement of Changes in Partners Equity for the year ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-117 |
|
Notes to the Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-118 |
|
Unaudited Interim Consolidated U.S. GAAP Financial
Statements of Veritas
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three months ended October 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
F-127 |
|
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets as at
October 31, 2006 and July 31, 2006
|
|
|
F-128 |
|
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Information for the three months ended October 31, 2006 and
2005
|
|
|
F-129 |
|
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-130 |
|
Annual Consolidated U.S. GAAP Financial Statements of
Veritas
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-146 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-147 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as at July 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
F-148 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-149 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
for the years ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-151 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-152 |
|
F-1
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
F-2
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(audited) | |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable, net
|
|
|
331.4 |
|
|
|
297.5 |
|
Inventories and work-in-progress, net
|
|
|
171.9 |
|
|
|
139.5 |
|
Income tax assets
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Other current assets, net
|
|
|
53.5 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
745.1 |
|
|
|
604.5 |
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
Investments and other financial assets, net
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
485.0 |
|
|
|
480.1 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
|
|
|
408.4 |
|
|
|
389.2 |
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
1,006.6 |
|
|
|
960.6 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
|
1,751.7 |
|
|
|
1,565.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Current portion of financial debt
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
157.9 |
|
Trade accounts and notes payable
|
|
|
137.1 |
|
|
|
178.5 |
|
Accrued payroll costs
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
Advance billings to customers
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
Provisions current portion
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
377.3 |
|
|
|
505.2 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
Provisions non-current portion
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Financial debt
|
|
|
386.8 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
Derivative on convertible bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
500.4 |
|
|
|
349.7 |
|
Common stock, 34,762,762 shares authorized
17,507,110 shares with
a 2 nominal
value issued and outstanding at September 30, 2006;
17,081,680 at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
390.7 |
|
|
|
372.3 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
317.3 |
|
|
|
291.0 |
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Net income (loss) for the period Attributable to the
Group
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
Income and expense recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
850.5 |
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Total shareholders equity and minority interests
|
|
|
874.0 |
|
|
|
710.2 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
1,751.7 |
|
|
|
1,565.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-3
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Notes | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
restated(1) | |
|
|
|
restated(1) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions of euros, except per share data) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
607.5 |
|
|
|
321.1 |
|
|
|
220.5 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957.0 |
|
|
|
608.7 |
|
|
|
321.6 |
|
|
|
220.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(636.7 |
) |
|
|
(473.2 |
) |
|
|
(216.3 |
) |
|
|
(175.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320.3 |
|
|
|
135.5 |
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86.9 |
) |
|
|
(64.2 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217.6 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses related to financial debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.0 |
) |
|
|
(29.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Cost of financial debt, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
Derivative and other expenses on convertible bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(38.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.3 |
) |
Other financial income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from consolidated companies before income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167.0 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54.9 |
) |
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(21.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from consolidated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
(36.9 |
) |
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (losses) of affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.0 |
|
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,318,957 |
|
|
|
11,765,118 |
|
|
|
17,496,278 |
|
|
|
11,698,623 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,659 |
|
|
|
285,979 |
|
|
|
364,187 |
|
|
|
285,979 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from convertible bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
Dilutive weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,675,616 |
|
|
|
13,451,097 |
|
|
|
17,860,465 |
|
|
|
13,384,602 |
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
(2.37 |
) |
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
(1.57 |
) |
Diluted(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
|
|
(2.37 |
) |
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
(1.57 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
Restatement of IFRS financial statements in accordance with the
standards used to prepare the IFRS financial statements
contained in our annual report on
Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on
May 9, 2006. |
|
(2) |
Stock options and convertible bonds had an anti-dilutive effect
for the three months and the nine months periods ended
September 30, 2005; as a consequence, potential shares
linked to those instruments are not taken into account in the
adjusted dilutive weighted average number of shares, nor in the
calculation of diluted loss per share. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-4
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
restated(1) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
OPERATING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
121.0 |
|
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
76.0 |
|
|
|
51.0 |
|
Multi-client surveys amortization
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
Variance on provisions
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Expense & income calculated on stock-option
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Net gain on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
Dividends received from affiliates
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
Net cash including net cost of financial debt and income
taxes
|
|
|
282.5 |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
Less net cost of financial debt
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
Less income taxes expenses
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Net cash excluding net cost of financial debt and income
taxes
|
|
|
356.6 |
|
|
|
149.3 |
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
(60.6 |
) |
|
|
(28.1 |
) |
Net cash before changes in working capital
|
|
|
296.0 |
|
|
|
121.2 |
|
INVESTING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
change in trade accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
(52.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
change in inventories and work in progress
|
|
|
(28.3 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
change in other current assets
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
change in trade accounts and notes payable
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
13.1 |
|
change in other current liabilities
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
Impact of changes in exchange rate
|
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
194.3 |
|
|
|
109.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases of tangible & intangible assets
(included variation of fixed assets suppliers)
|
|
|
(131.3 |
) |
|
|
(67.7 |
) |
Investments in multi-client surveys
|
|
|
(38.9 |
) |
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals tangible & intangible
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Total net proceeds from financial assets
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition in investments, net of cash and cash equivalents
acquired
|
|
|
(47.7 |
) |
|
|
(262.2 |
) |
Variation in loans granted
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Variation in subsidies for Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Variation in other non-current financial assets
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities
|
|
|
(202.2 |
) |
|
|
(347.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(129.7 |
) |
|
|
(178.1 |
) |
Total issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
215.9 |
|
|
|
442.6 |
|
Reimbursement on leasing
|
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
Change in short-term loans
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Financial interest paid
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
Net proceeds from capital increase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from shareholders
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
from minority interest of integrated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid and share capital reimbursements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to minority interest of integrated companies
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Buying & sales from treasury shares
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
232.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
12.6 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
138.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Restatement of IFRS financial statements in accordance with the
standards used to prepare the IFRS financial statements
contained in our annual report on
Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on
May 9, 2006. |
F-5
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
recognized | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
equity and | |
|
|
shares | |
|
Share | |
|
paid-in | |
|
Retained | |
|
Treasury | |
|
directly in | |
|
translation | |
|
shareholders | |
|
Minority | |
|
minority | |
|
|
issued | |
|
capital | |
|
capital | |
|
earnings | |
|
shares | |
|
equity | |
|
adjustment | |
|
equity | |
|
interests | |
|
interest | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Balance at January 01, 2005
|
|
|
11,682,218 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
173.4 |
|
|
|
208.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
393.3 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
402.3 |
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
147,432 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
Cost of share-based payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Transactions with treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Financial instruments: variance and transfer to income
statement(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Foreign currency translation: variance and transfer to income
statement(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense recognized directly in equity(1) + (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Others(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54.2 |
) |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2005 restated(b)
|
|
|
11,829,650 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
126.8 |
|
|
|
234.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
390.9 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
401.9 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Deduction from issuance premium for allocation to the carry
forward |
|
(b) |
|
Restatement of IFRS financial statements in accordance with the
standards used to prepare the IFRS financial statements
contained in our annual report on
Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on
May 9, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
recognized | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
equity and | |
|
|
shares | |
|
Share | |
|
paid-in | |
|
Retained | |
|
Treasury | |
|
directly in | |
|
translation | |
|
shareholders | |
|
Minority | |
|
minority | |
|
|
issued | |
|
capital | |
|
capital | |
|
earnings | |
|
shares | |
|
equity | |
|
adjustment | |
|
equity | |
|
interests | |
|
interest | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros) | |
Balance at January 01, 2006
|
|
|
17,081,680 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
372.3 |
|
|
|
283.2 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
710.2 |
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
128,852 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Conversion of convertible bonds
|
|
|
274,914 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
121.0 |
|
Cost of share-based payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
Transactions with treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Actuarial gains/losses on pension plans(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Financial instruments: variance and transfer to income
statement(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Foreign currency translation: variance and transfer to income
statement(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense recognized directly in
equity(1) + (2) + (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
(25.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
Others(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
17,507,110 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
390.7 |
|
|
|
437.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
850.5 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
874.0 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Sale of 49% of CGG Ardiseis to minority shareholders. |
F-6
Statement of income and expenses attributable to
shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September, 30 | |
|
|
September, 30 | |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
restated(1) | |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Net income
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
Actuarial gains and losses on pension plans
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Variance in fair value of hedging instruments
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Variance in fair value of available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance in foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incomes and expenses recognized directly in equity for the
period
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restatement of IFRS financial statements in accordance with the
standards used to prepare the IFRS financial statements
contained in our annual report on
Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on
May 9, 2006. |
F-7
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1
Summary of significant accounting policies
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique, S.A. (the
Company) and its subsidiaries (together, the
Group) is a global participant in the geophysical
services industry, providing a wide range of seismic data
acquisition, processing and interpretation services as well as
related processing and interpretation software to clients in the
oil and gas exploration and production business. It is also a
global manufacturer of geophysical equipment.
Pursuant to European regulation n 1606/2002 dated July 19,
2002, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) and its interpretations
adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB) at September 30, 2006.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies, which we have applied in
preparing our interim consolidated financial statements at and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 are the same
as those applied in preparing our consolidated financial
statements at and for the year ended December 31, 2005, as
described in our 2005
Form 20-F annual
report.
The following Standards and Interpretations have been effective
since January 1, 2006:
|
|
|
IFRS 6 Exploration for and evaluation of mineral
resources |
|
|
Amendment to IAS 19 Employee benefits
Actuarial gains and losses, Group Plans and Disclosures |
|
|
Amendment to IAS 21 Net investment in a foreign
operation |
|
|
Amendment to IAS 39 Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement The Fair Value Option |
|
|
Amendment to IAS 39 Cash-flow Hedge Accounting of
Forecast Intragroup Transactions |
|
|
Amendment to IAS 39 and to IFRS 4 Financial
Guarantees Contracts |
|
|
Amendment to IFRS 1 and to IFRS 6 First time
adoption of IFRS 6 |
|
|
IFRIC 4 Determining whether an arrangement contains
a lease |
|
|
IFRIC 5 Rights to interests arising from
decommissioning, restoration and environmental rehabilitation
funds |
|
|
IFRIC 6 Liabilities arising from Participating in a
Specific Market Waste electrical and Electronic
equipment |
|
|
These Standards and Interpretations had no significant impact on
our consolidated financial statements. |
At the date of issuance of these financial statements, the
following Standards and Interpretations were issued but not yet
effective:
|
|
|
IFRS 7 Financial instruments Disclosures |
|
|
Amendment to IAS 1 Presentation of financial
statements: Capital disclosures |
F-8
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
IFRIC 7 Applying the restatement approach under IAS
29 Financial reporting in hyperinflationary economies |
|
|
IFRIC 8 Scope of IFRS 2 |
|
|
IFRIC 9 Reassessment of embedded derivatives |
|
|
IFRIC 10 Interim Financial Reporting and Impairment |
We are currently reviewing these Standards and Interpretations
to measure the potential impact on our consolidated financial
statements. At this stage, we do not anticipate any significant
impact.
Note 2
Analysis by operating segment and geographic zone
The following tables present revenues, operating income and
identifiable assets by operating segment, operating revenues by
geographic zone (by location of customers and by origin) as well
as operating revenues by category.
The Group principally services the oil and gas exploration and
production industry and currently operates in two industry
segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Geophysical services, which consist of (i) land seismic
data acquisition, (ii) marine seismic data acquisition,
(iii) other geophysical data acquisition, including
activities not exclusively linked to oilfield services, and
(iv) data processing, and data management; |
|
|
|
Products, which consist of the manufacture and sale of equipment
involved in seismic data acquisition, such as recording and
transmission equipment and vibrators for use in land seismic
acquisition. |
Analysis by operating segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Eliminations | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Services | |
|
Products | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Services | |
|
Products | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
|
603.3 |
|
|
|
352.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
|
391.6 |
|
|
|
215.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607.5 |
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
69.2 |
|
|
|
(69.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
603.9 |
|
|
|
421.5 |
|
|
|
(69.8 |
) |
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
|
392.1 |
|
|
|
256.0 |
|
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
|
607.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
605.3 |
|
|
|
421.5 |
|
|
|
(69.8 |
) |
|
|
957.0 |
|
|
|
|
393.3 |
|
|
|
256.0 |
|
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
|
608.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
129.7 |
|
|
|
113.5 |
|
|
|
(25.6 |
)(a) |
|
|
217.6 |
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
|
(18.3 |
)(a) |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (loss) of investees
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Capital expenditures(b)
|
|
|
162.8 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
169.0 |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
101.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization(c)
|
|
|
130.9 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
99.3 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
1,154.5 |
|
|
|
476.7 |
|
|
|
(103.7 |
) |
|
|
1,527.5 |
|
|
|
|
1,072.1 |
|
|
|
358.2 |
|
|
|
(82.8 |
) |
|
|
1,347.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated and corporate assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,751.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,531.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes general corporate expenses
of 19.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
of 8.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 |
|
(b) |
|
Includes (i) investments in multi-client surveys
of 38.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
and 19.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005,
(ii) equipment acquired under capital leases of
0.2 million
for nine months ended September 30, 2006
and 13.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005,
(iii) capitalized development costs in the Services segment
for 7.0 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
and 3.1 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, and
(iv) capitalized development costs in the Products segment
for 2.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
and 2.4 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 |
|
(c) |
|
Includes multi-client amortization
of 60.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
and 48.3 million
for nine months ended September 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Eliminations | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Services | |
|
Products | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Services | |
|
Products | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
|
201.0 |
|
|
|
120.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321.1 |
|
|
|
|
143.2 |
|
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220.5 |
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
201.0 |
|
|
|
134.3 |
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
321.1 |
|
|
|
|
143.4 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
220.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
201.5 |
|
|
|
134.3 |
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
321.6 |
|
|
|
|
143.8 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
220.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
(7.1 |
)(a) |
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
(8.7 |
)(a) |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (loss) of investees
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Capital expenditures(b)
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
36.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization(c)
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
36.0 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes general corporate expenses
of 6.4 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
of 2.5 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2005. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes (i) investments in multi-client surveys
of 12.4 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2006
and 4.2 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2005, (ii) no
equipment acquired under capital leases for the three months
ended September 30, 2006 and
0.4 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2005,
(iii) and development costs capitalized in the Services
segment
of 3.6 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
0.9 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2005, and
(iv) development costs capitalized in the Products segment
of 1.0 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
0.6 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2005. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes multi-client amortization
of 22.1 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
of 17.0 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2005. |
F-10
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Analysis by geographic zone
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating
revenues by geographic zone, and the percentage of total
consolidated operating revenues represented thereby, during each
of the periods stated:
|
|
|
Analysis of operating revenues by location of
customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros, except percentages) | |
France
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Rest of Europe
|
|
|
215.0 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
133.2 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
67.2 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
Asia-Pacific/ Middle East
|
|
|
313.2 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
|
217.1 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
|
90.5 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
% |
Africa
|
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
Americas
|
|
|
314.0 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
|
178.7 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
% |
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
607.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
321.1 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
220.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of operating revenues by location of
origin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros, except percentages) | |
France
|
|
|
211.3 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
137.6 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
74.4 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
Rest of Europe
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
49.4 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
Asia-Pacific/ Middle East
|
|
|
216.2 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
145.4 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
Africa
|
|
|
79.1 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
Americas
|
|
|
367.4 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
196.8 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
% |
|
|
114.6 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
|
87.1 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total
|
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
607.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
321.1 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
220.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 3 RECONCILIATION TO U.S. GAAP
A SUMMARY OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES
FOLLOWED BY THE GROUP AND U.S. GAAP
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) as endorsed by the European Union, which
differ in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. These
differences relate mainly to the following items, and the
necessary adjustments are shown in the tables in section B below.
Goodwill
Under IFRS, we no longer amortize goodwill beginning
January 1, 2004. Under U.S. GAAP, we no longer amortize
goodwill beginning January 1, 2002.
Deferred taxes
Under IFRS, deferred tax assets or liabilities, related to
non-monetary assets or liabilities that are remeasured from the
local currency into the functional currency using historical
exchange rates and that result from changes in exchange rates,
are recognized.
F-11
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Under U.S. GAAP, deferred tax liabilities or assets are not
recognized for differences related to assets and liabilities
that, under FASB Statement N° 52 (Foreign
Currency Translation), are remeasured from the local
currency into the functional currency using historical exchange
rates and that result from changes in exchange rates.
Currency translation adjustment
Under IFRS, the accumulated total of translation adjustments at
January 1, 2004 is reversed against consolidated reserves.
As a consequence, all gains and losses linked to the currency
translation adjustment on entities that are sold or that exit
our scope of scope of consolidation are computed on the basis of
the restated currency translation adjustment.
Under U.S. GAAP, historical values are maintained for currency
translation adjustment and thus for calculation of gains and
losses linked to the currency translation adjustment on entities
that are sold or that exit our scope of consolidation.
Stock-based compensation
Under IFRS, stock options granted to employees are included in
the financial statements using the following principles: the
stock options fair value is determined on the granting
date and is recognized in personnel costs on a straight-line
basis over the period between the grant date and the exercise
date corresponding to the vesting period. Stock
option fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes model
only for stock-options plans granted since November 7, 2002.
Under U.S. GAAP, the Group applies the FAS 123R standard in
2006. Compensation costs for requisite services rendered over
the period are recognized at their fair value through the income
statement. This method applies to all plans granted by the Group.
Development costs
Under IFRS, expenditure on development activities, whereby
research findings are applied to a plan or design for the
production of new or substantially improved products and
processes, is capitalized if:
|
|
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately
identified and reliably measured, |
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible
and, |
|
|
|
the Group has sufficient resources to complete development. |
Under U.S. GAAP, all expenditures related to research and
development are recognized as an expense in the income statement.
Convertible bonds
For U.S. GAAP purposes, as regards convertible bonds, there was
an embedded derivative that cannot be reliably assessed,
corresponding to the early redemption clause (see note 12
to our consolidated annual financial statements included in our
Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2005) that was not recognized in
the financial statements. The convertible bonds were fully
converted in May 2006 and the early redemption clause was not
exercised.
F-12
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Pension, post-employment benefits and other post-employment
benefits
Under IFRS, we record actuarial gains and losses on defined
benefit plans directly in equity.
Under U.S. GAAP, we record actuarial gains and losses on defined
benefit plans as a cost in the income statement.
Derivative instruments and hedging activity
Under IFRS, long-term contracts in foreign currencies (primarily
U.S. dollar) are not considered to include embedded
derivatives when such contracts are routinely denominated in
this currency (primarily U.S. dollars) in the industry.
Under U.S. GAAP, such an exemption does not exist and embedded
derivatives in
long-term contracts in
foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollar) are recorded in
the balance sheet at fair value and revenues and expenses with a
non-U.S. client or supplier are recognized at the forward
exchange rate negotiated at the beginning of the contract. The
variation of fair market value of the embedded derivative
foreign exchange contracts is recognized in earnings.
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a
period except those resulting from investments by owners and
distributions to owners. In our consolidated financial
statements, the concept of comprehensive income correspond to
the caption Gains and losses directly recognized in equity
in IFRS consolidated statements.
In U.S. GAAP financial statements, comprehensive income and its
components must be displayed in a statement of comprehensive
income.
For us, this statements includes, in addition to net income:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the cumulative translation adjustment related to
consolidated foreign subsidiaries, |
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designed as
cash flow hedges meeting the criteria established by
SFAS 133; and |
|
|
|
changes in the amount of the additional minimum pension
liability due to actuarial losses. |
F-13
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
B RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY TO U.S. GAAP
Consolidated Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
restated | |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(in millions of euros, | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders as reported
in Consolidated Statements of operations
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
Deferred tax (FAS 109)
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt (APB 26)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Stock options
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Actuarial gain/(loss) on pension plan
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of IFRS long-term contracts adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Cancellation of IFRS tangible assets adjustment
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Cancellation of IFRS capitalization of development costs (before
tax)
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
Deferred tax on cancellation of IFRS capitalization of
development costs (2)
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments (FAS 133)
|
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income according to U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,318,957 |
|
|
|
11,765,118 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from stock-options
|
|
|
356,659 |
|
|
|
285,979 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from convertible bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed option exercises
|
|
|
17,675,616 |
|
|
|
13,451,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic for shareholder
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
(1.30 |
) |
Diluted for shareholder
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
(1.30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Restatement of IFRS financial statements in accordance with the
standards used to prepare the IFRS financial statements
contained in our annual report on
Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on
May 9, 2006. |
(2) |
Tax effect is linked to the first-time recognition of all the
deferred tax liability position on capitalized development costs
under IFRS of French tax Group, which is cancelled under U.S.
GAAP. |
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Shareholders equity as reported in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
850.5 |
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
Goodwill amortization (FAS 142) (a)
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
Deferred tax (FAS 109) (a)
|
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
Stock options
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS tangible assets adjustment
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS capitalization of development costs (a)
|
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity according to U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
811.7 |
|
|
|
689.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Net of currency translation adjustment effect and of deferred tax |
F-14
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
CONDENSED US GAAP INCOME STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET
Condensed US GAAP income statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
restated (1) | |
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
967.7 |
|
|
|
601.6 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(636.4 |
) |
|
|
(469.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
331.3 |
|
|
|
132.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(87.4 |
) |
|
|
(64.1 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
215.0 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of financial debt, net
|
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
Derivative and other expenses on convertible bonds
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(38.0 |
) |
Other financial income (loss)
|
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
|
|
21.4 |
|
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income of consolidated companies before income taxes and
minority interests
|
|
|
136.6 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(41.4 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
Minority interests
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,318,957 |
|
|
|
11,765,118 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from stock-options
|
|
|
356,659 |
|
|
|
285,979 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from convertible bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed option exercises
when dilutive
|
|
|
17,675,616 |
|
|
|
13,451,097 |
|
Net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic for shareholder
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
(1.30 |
) |
|
Diluted for shareholder
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
(1.30 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
Restatement of IFRS financial statements in accordance with the
standards used to prepare the IFRS financial statements
contained in our annual report on
Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on
May 9, 2006. |
F-15
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Condensed US GAAP Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
750.2 |
|
|
|
608.5 |
|
Long-term assets
|
|
|
1,001.0 |
|
|
|
965.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
1,751.2 |
|
|
|
1,573.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
407.5 |
|
|
|
509.9 |
|
Long term liabilities
|
|
|
508.5 |
|
|
|
362.7 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
811.7 |
|
|
|
689.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
1,751.2 |
|
|
|
1,573.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Comprehensive income (loss) US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Net income (loss) under US GAAP
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
(30.8 |
) |
|
|
18.2 |
|
Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
Comprehensive income (loss) under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
68.2 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Statement of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Cumulative Translation adjustment
|
|
|
(72.7 |
) |
|
|
(47.0 |
) |
Fair value of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive loss under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
(69.1 |
) |
|
|
(50.2 |
) |
NOTE 4 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION FOR
CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES
The following table presents condensed consolidating financial
information in IFRS for the Company, on the one hand, and CGG
Canada Services Ltd, CGG Americas, Inc., CGG Marine Resources
Norge A/ S, Sercel Inc., Sercel Australia Pty Ltd and Sercel
Canada Ltd, taken as a group ( the Subsidiary
Group), on the other hand,
F-16
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005. The column Sercel Subsidiary Group includes
Sercel Inc., Sercel Australia Pty Ltd and Sercel Canada Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sercel | |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary | |
|
|
|
Consolidating | |
|
|
|
Subsidiary | |
IFRS |
|
CGG | |
|
Group | |
|
Others | |
|
adjustments | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
952.9 |
|
|
|
610.8 |
|
|
|
1,359.7 |
|
|
|
(1,171.7 |
) |
|
|
1,751.7 |
|
|
|
208.7 |
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
|
|
423.5 |
|
|
|
791.2 |
|
|
|
(469.9 |
) |
|
|
955.6 |
|
|
|
229.2 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
126.4 |
|
|
|
135.8 |
|
|
|
(54.0 |
) |
|
|
217.6 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
126.6 |
|
|
|
(131.3 |
) |
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
895.5 |
|
|
|
542.9 |
|
|
|
955.3 |
|
|
|
(863.3 |
) |
|
|
1,530.4 |
|
|
|
190.3 |
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
155.9 |
|
|
|
193.4 |
|
|
|
474.9 |
|
|
|
(216.8 |
) |
|
|
607.4 |
|
|
|
93.8 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
|
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
(108.7 |
) |
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
F-17
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004
F-18
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
|
|
|
BARBIER FRINAULT & AUTRES
ERNST & YOUNG
41, rue Ybry
92576 Neuilly-sur-Seine cedex |
|
MAZARS & GUERARD
MAZARS
Le Vinci 4, allée de lArche
92075 La Defense cedex |
Report of independent auditors
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Compagnie
Générale de Géophysique, S.A.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique, S.A. as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity
and cash flows for each of the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Compagnie Générale de
Géophysique, S.A. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and
the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the
European Union.
International Financial reporting Standards vary in certain
significant respects from accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Information relating
to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in
Note 31 to the consolidated financial statements.
Neuilly-sur-Seine and Paris La Défense, April 26,
2006 except for the note 31 for which the date is
May 9, 2006
|
|
|
|
BARBIER FRINAULT & AUTRES
ERNST & YOUNG
/s/ Pascal MACIOCE
Pascal
MACIOCE |
|
MAZARS & GUERARD
/s/ Philippe CASTAGNAC
Philippe
CASTAGNAC |
F-19
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Notes | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(amounts in | |
|
|
|
|
millions of euros) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable, net
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
297.5 |
|
|
|
196.8 |
|
Inventories and work-in-progress, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
139.5 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
Income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Other current assets, net
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604.5 |
|
|
|
467.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
Investments and other financial assets, net
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
480.1 |
|
|
|
204.1 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
389.2 |
|
|
|
225.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
960.6 |
|
|
|
504.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,565.1 |
|
|
|
971.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Current portion of financial debt
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
157.9 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
Trade accounts and notes payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178.5 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
Accrued payroll costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Advance billings to customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Provisions current portion
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505.2 |
|
|
|
296.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
Provisions non-current portion
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Financial debt
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
176.5 |
|
Derivative on convertible bonds
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349.7 |
|
|
|
272.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: 28,938,836 shares authorized and 17,081,680 shares
with a
2 nominal
value issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005;
11,682,218 at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372.3 |
|
|
|
173.4 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291.0 |
|
|
|
214.5 |
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
Net loss for the period Attributable to the Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Income and expense recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
|
|
393.2 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity and minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710.2 |
|
|
|
402.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,565.1 |
|
|
|
971.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements
F-20
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Notes | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros, | |
|
|
|
|
except per share data) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
687.4 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Total income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
871.8 |
|
|
|
687.8 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(670.0 |
) |
|
|
(554.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
201.8 |
|
|
|
133.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
(78.6 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses related to financial debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.8 |
) |
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Cost of financial debt, net
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(42.3 |
) |
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
Variance on derivative on convertible bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
Other financial income (loss)
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from consolidated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.8 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,095,925 |
|
|
|
11,681,406 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from
stock-options(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,789 |
|
|
|
108,631 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from convertible
bonds(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,500 |
|
|
|
233,333 |
|
Dilutive weighted average number of shares outstanding adjusted
when dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,095,925 |
|
|
|
11,681,406 |
|
Net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
Diluted(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
Stock-options and convertible bonds have an anti-dilutive effect
at December 31, 2005 and at December 31, 2004; as a
consequence, potential shares linked to those instruments are
not taken into account in the adjusted dilutive weighted average
number of shares, nor in the calculation of diluted loss per
share. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements
F-21
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Notes | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(amounts in | |
|
|
|
|
millions of euros) | |
OPERATING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
65.5 |
|
Multi-client surveys amortization
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
69.6 |
|
|
|
66.5 |
|
Variance on provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
Cancellation of expense & income calculated on
stock-option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Cancellation of net gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
Equity in income of affiliates,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Dividends received from affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
Net cash including net cost of financial debt and income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166.8 |
|
|
|
128.0 |
|
Less net cost of financial debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
Less income taxes expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Net cash excluding net cost of financial debt and income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235.7 |
|
|
|
166.7 |
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(31.7 |
) |
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
Net cash before changes in working capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204.0 |
|
|
|
149.7 |
|
change in trade accounts and notes receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.3 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
change in inventories and work-in-progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
change in other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
17.4 |
|
change in trade accounts and notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
change in other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
Impact of changes in exchange rate on financial items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182.4 |
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures (including variation of fixed assets
suppliers, excluding multi-client surveys)
|
|
|
9 et 10 |
|
|
|
(117.1 |
) |
|
|
(44.4 |
) |
Investments in multi-client surveys
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
|
|
(51.1 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals tangible & intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Total net proceeds from financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
Acquisition of investments, net of cash & cash
equivalents acquired
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(265.8 |
) |
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
Variation in loans granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Variation in subsidies for capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Variation in other non-current financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Net cash from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(411.1 |
) |
|
|
(100.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayement of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(391.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
Total issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461.1 |
|
|
|
73.7 |
|
Reimbursement on leasing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
Change in short-term loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Financial expenses paid
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
Net proceeds from capital increase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
from minority interest of integrated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid and share capital reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to minority interest of integrated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/disposal of from treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193.4 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
34.2 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements
F-22
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
recognized | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
equity and | |
|
|
shares | |
|
Share | |
|
paid-in | |
|
Retained | |
|
Treasury | |
|
directly in | |
|
translation | |
|
shareholders | |
|
Minority | |
|
minority | |
|
|
issued | |
|
capital | |
|
capital | |
|
earnings | |
|
shares | |
|
equity | |
|
adjustment | |
|
equity | |
|
interest | |
|
interest | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros) | |
Balance at January 1, 2004
|
|
|
11,680,718 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
292.7 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419.2 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
428.0 |
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
Cost of share-based payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Operations on treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Financial instruments: variance and transfer to income
statement(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Financial assets: variance and transfer to income
statement(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
Foreign currency translation: variance and transfer to income
statement
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense recognized directly in equity(1)+(2)+(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
Others(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119.3 |
) |
|
|
119.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
11,682,218 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
173.4 |
|
|
|
208.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
393.2 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
402.3 |
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
4,251,962 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
199.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207.6 |
|
Conversion of convertible bonds
|
|
|
1,147,500 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.2 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
Cost of share-based payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Operations on treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Financial instruments: variance and transfer to income
statement(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
Foreign currency translation: variance and transfer to income
statement
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense recognized directly in equity(1)+(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
Others(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54.2 |
) |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
17,081,680 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
372.3 |
|
|
|
283.2 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) (b) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
710.2 |
|
|
|
(a) |
Transfer of additional paid-in-capital to retained earnings. |
|
(b) |
Includes 42,500 treasury shares acquired in the frame of a
liquidity contract. |
F-23
Statement of incomes and expenses attributable to
shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts | |
|
|
in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Net income
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Variance in fair value of available-for-sale
investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
Variance in fair value of hedging instruments
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Variance in foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incomes and expenses recognized directly in equity for the
period
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-24
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique, S.A.
(the Company) and its subsidiaries (together, the
Group) is a global participant in the geophysical
services industry, providing a wide range of seismic data
acquisition, processing and interpretation services as well as
related processing and interpretation software to clients in the
oil and gas exploration and production business. It is also a
global manufacturer of geophysical equipment.
Pursuant to European regulation n° 1606/2002 dated
July 19, 2002, the accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and its
interpretations adopted by the International Accounting
Standards Board (IASB) at December 31, 2005. They
include comparative information for the comparable period of
2004 using the same standards.
According to general provisions of IFRS 1 First-time
adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, the
Group has opted to apply the following options and exemptions as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Business combinations (IFRS 3): the Group has opted not to
restate business combinations that occurred before
January 1, 2004, |
|
|
|
Measurement of certain items of property, plant and equipment at
fair value (IAS 16): the Group has opted not to reassess
property, plant and equipment and intangible assets at fair
value. Property, plant and equipment are maintained at
historical cost, |
|
|
|
Actuarial gains and losses on pension and other post-employment
benefit plans (IAS 19): cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains
and losses on pension and other post-employment benefits plans
at January 1, 2004 have been recognized in
shareholders equity in the opening balance sheet, |
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments: the accumulated total of
translation adjustments at January 1, 2004 has been
reversed against consolidated reserves, |
|
|
|
Only stock option plans issued after November 7, 2002 and
not fully vested as of January 1, 2005 are accounted for in
accordance with IFRS2. |
Moreover, the Group applied early application starting from
January 1, 2004 of the following standards:
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments: the Group elect the option to apply
standards IAS 32 and 39 from January 1, 2004; |
Note 30 Transition to IFRS describes the
reclassifications and the restatements between French GAAP and
IFRS, and reconciles net income and equity to IFRS in 2004.
International Financial Reporting Standards differ in certain
significant respects from accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP).
Note 31 Reconciliation to US GAAP
describes the principal differences between IFRS and
U.S. GAAP as they relate to the Group, and reconciles net
income and shareholders equity to U.S. GAAP as of and
for the period ended December 31, 2005.
When preparing consolidated financial statements according to
IFRS, some items in the balance sheet, in the income statement
and in disclosures are assessed by the Groups management
based on estimates and hypothesis. Actual figures may differ
from estimated figures.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies, which we have applied
consistently are fully described below. However, certain of our
accounting policies are particularly important to the portrayal
of our financial position and results of operations. As we must
exercise significant judgment when we apply these policies,
their application is subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty.
F-25
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
1 Basis of
consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
CGG and all majority-owned subsidiaries.
We use the equity method for investments in which our ownership
interest ranges from 20% to 50% and we exercise significant
influence over operating and financial policies. We may account
for certain investments where the Groups ownership is
below 20% using the equity method when we exercise significant
influence (Board membership or equivalent) over the business.
All inter-company transactions and accounts are eliminated in
consolidation.
Our consolidated financial statements are reported in euros.
2 Foreign
currency
The financial statements of all of our foreign subsidiaries are
maintained in the local currency, which is the functional
currency, with the exception of the financial statements of
subsidiaries operating in Norway (including notably some
subsidiaries of Exploration Resources), in Malaysia and
Venezuela. In those subsidiaries, the functional currency is the
U.S. dollar, the currency in which they primarily conduct
their business. Goodwill attributable to foreign subsidiaries is
accounted for in the functional currency of the applicable
entities.
When translating the foreign currency financial statements of
foreign subsidiaries to euro, year-end exchange rates are
applied to balance sheet items, while average annual exchange
rates are applied to income statement items. Adjustments
resulting from this process are recorded in a separate component
of shareholders equity. With respect to foreign affiliates
accounted for using the equity method, the effects of exchange
rates changes on the net assets of the affiliate are recorded in
a separate component of shareholders equity.
Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional
currency of a given entity are recorded at the exchange rate
prevailing on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies other than the
functional currency are re-evaluated at year-end exchange rates
and any resulting unrealized exchange gains and losses are
included in income.
3 Business
combinations
Business combinations after January 1, 2004 are accounted
for in accordance with IFRS. Assets and liabilities acquired are
recognized at their fair value at the date of acquisition. The
remaining difference between the fair value of assets and
liabilities acquired and the consideration tendered in an
acquisition is recorded as goodwill and allocated to the cash
generating units.
4 Operating
revenues
Operating revenues are recognized when they can be measured
reliably, and when it is likely that the economic benefits
associated with the transaction will flow to the entity, which
is at the point that such revenues have been realized or are
considered realizable. For contracts where the percentage on
completion method of accounting is being applied, revenues are
only recognized when the costs incurred for the transaction and
the cost to complete the transaction can be measured reliably
and such revenues are considered earned and realizable.
Multi-client surveys consist of seismic surveys to be licensed
to customers on a non-exclusive basis. All costs directly
incurred in acquiring, processing and otherwise completing
seismic surveys are capitalized into the multi-client surveys.
The value of our multi-client library is stated on our balance
sheet at the aggregate of those costs less accumulated
amortization or at fair value if lower. We review the library
for potential impairment of our independent surveys on an
ongoing basis.
F-26
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Revenues related to multi-client surveys result from
(i) pre-commitments and (ii) licenses after completion
of the surveys (after-sales).
Pre-commitments Generally, we obtain
commitments from a limited number of customers before a seismic
project is completed. These pre-commitments cover part or all of
the survey area blocks. In return for the commitment, the
customer typically gains the right to direct or influence the
project specifications, advance access to data as it is being
acquired, and favorable pricing. The Company records payments
that it receives during periods of mobilization as advance
billing in the balance sheet in the line item Advance
billings to customers.
The Company recognizes pre-commitments as revenue when
production is begun based on the ratio of project cost incurred
during that period to total estimated project cost. The Company
believes this ratio to be generally consistent with the physical
progress of the project.
After sales Generally, we grant a license
entitling non-exclusive access to a complete and ready for use,
specifically defined portion of our multi-client data library in
exchange for a fixed and determinable payment. We recognize
after sales revenue upon the client executing a valid license
agreement and having been granted access to the data. Within
thirty days of execution and access, the client may exercise our
warranty that the medium on which the data is transmitted (a
magnetic cartridge) is free from technical defects. If the
warranty is exercised, the Company will provide the same data on
a new magnetic cartridge. The cost of providing new magnetic
cartridges is negligible.
After sales volume agreements We enter into a
customer arrangement in which we agree to grant licenses to the
customer for access to a specified number of blocks of the
multi-client library. These arrangements typically enable the
customer to select and access the specific blocks for a limited
period of time. We recognize revenue when the blocks are
selected and the client has been granted access to the data.
Within thirty days of execution and access, the client may
exercise our warranty that the medium on which the data is
transmitted (a magnetic cartridge) is free from technical
defects. If the warranty is exercised, the Company will provide
the same data on a new magnetic cartridge. The cost of providing
new magnetic cartridges is negligible.
In exclusive surveys, we perform seismic services (acquisition
and processing) for a specific customer. We recognize
proprietary/contract revenues as the services are rendered. We
evaluate the progress to date, in a manner generally consistent
with the physical progress of the project, and recognize
revenues based on the ratio of the project cost incurred during
that period to the total estimated project cost. We believe this
ratio to be generally consistent with the physical progress of
the project.
The billings and the costs related to the transits of seismic
vessels at the beginning of the survey are deferred and
recognized over the duration of the contract by reference to the
technical stage of completion.
In some exclusive survey contracts and a limited number of
multi-client survey contracts, the Company is required to meet
certain milestones. The Company defers recognition of revenue on
such contracts until all milestones that provide the customer a
right of cancellation or refund of amounts paid have been met.
|
|
|
Other geophysical services |
Revenues from our other geophysical services are recognized as
the services are performed and, when related to long-term
contracts, using the proportional performance method of
recognizing revenues.
We recognize revenues on equipment sales upon delivery to the
customer. Any advance billings to customers are recorded in
current liabilities.
F-27
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
Software and hardware sales |
We recognize revenues from the sale of software and hardware
products following acceptance of the product by the customer at
which time we have no further significant vendor obligations
remaining. Any advance billings to customers are recorded in
current liabilities.
If an arrangement to deliver software, either alone or together
with other products or services, requires significant
production, modification, or customization of software, the
entire arrangement is accounted for as a production-type
contract, i.e. using the percentage of completion method.
If the software arrangement provides for multiple deliverables
(e.g. upgrades or enhancements, post-contract customer support
such as maintenance, or services), the revenue is allocated to
the various elements based on specific objective evidence of
fair value, regardless of any separate allocations stated within
the contract for each element. Each element is appropriately
accounted for under the applicable accounting standard.
Maintenance revenues consist primarily of post contract customer
support agreements and are recorded as advance billings to
customers and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis
over the contract period.
5 Cost of
financial debt
Cost of financial debt is expensed in the income statement on
the period in which it is borne, regardless of the use of funds
borrowed.
Cost of financial debt includes expenses related to financial
debt, composed of bonds, the debt component of convertible
bonds, bank loans, capital-lease obligations and other financial
borrowings, net of income provided by cash and cash equivalents.
6 Income
taxes
Income taxes includes all tax based on taxable profit.
7 Intangible and
tangible assets
In accordance with IAS 16 Property, Plant and
equipment and IAS 38 Intangible assets only
items for which cost can be reliably measured and for which the
future economic benefits are likely to flow to us are recorded
in our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
Property, plant and equipment are valued at historical cost less
accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Depreciation is
generally calculated over the following useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
equipments and tools:
|
|
|
3 to 10 years |
|
vehicles:
|
|
|
3 to 5 years |
|
seismic vessels:
|
|
|
12 to 30 years |
|
buildings for industrial use:
|
|
|
20 years |
|
buildings for administrative and commercial use:
|
|
|
20 to 40 years |
|
Starting from September 1, 2005, the date at which we
acquired Exploration Resources, we harmonized the useful life of
our vessels to 30 years. The impact of this change in
estimate for the period through December 31, 2005 is a
minor depreciation of
0.8 million.
Depreciation expense is determined using the straight-line
method.
F-28
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Fixed assets acquired through finance lease arrangements or
long-term rental arrangements that transfer substantially all
the risks and rewards associated with the ownership of the asset
to us or tenant are capitalized.
We include residual value, if significant, when calculating the
depreciable amount. We segregate tangible assets into their
separate components if there is a significant difference in
their expected useful lives, and depreciate them accordingly.
Assets under a capital lease agreement or a long-term lease
agreement that transfers substantially all the risks and rewards
incidental to ownership to the Group are accounted for as fixed
assets at the commencement of the lease term, at amounts equal
to the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, the
present value of the minimum lease payments, each determined at
the inception of the lease. Minimum lease payments are
apportioned between the finance charge and the reduction of the
outstanding liability and the finance charge is allocated to
each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant
periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the
liability. Assets under capital lease are depreciated over the
shorter of its useful life and the lease term, if there is no
reasonable certainty that the Group will obtain ownership by the
end of the lease term.
Rent payments under operating leases are recognized as operating
expenses over the lease term.
Goodwill is determined according to 3 Business
Combinations. Upon transition to IFRS, goodwill is no longer
amortized in accordance with IFRS 3 Business
combinations.
Multi-client surveys consist of seismic surveys to be licensed
to customers on a non-exclusive basis. All costs directly
incurred in acquiring, processing and otherwise completing
seismic surveys are capitalized into the multi-client surveys
(including transit costs when applicable). The value of our
multi-client library is stated on our balance sheet at the
aggregate of those costs less accumulated amortization or at
fair value if lower. We review the library for potential
impairment of our independent surveys on an ongoing basis.
We amortize the multi-client surveys over the period during
which the data is expected to be marketed using a pro-rata
method based on recognized revenues as a percentage of total
estimated sales (such estimation relies on the historical sales
track record). In this respect, we use three different sets of
parameters depending on the area or type of surveys considered:
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf of Mexico surveys are amortized on the basis of 66.6% of
revenues. Starting at time of data delivery, a minimum
straight-line depreciation scheme is applied on a three-year
period, should total accumulated depreciation from the 66.6% of
revenues amortization method be below this minimum level; |
|
|
|
Rest of the world surveys: same as above except depreciation is
83.3% of revenues and straight-line depreciation is over a
five-year period from data delivery; and |
|
|
|
Long term strategic 2D surveys are amortized on the basis of
revenues according to the above area split and straight-line
depreciation on a seven-year period from data delivery. |
F-29
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Expenditures on research activities undertaken with the prospect
of gaining new scientific or technological knowledge and
understanding are recognized in the income statement as expenses
as incurred and are presented as Research and development
expenses net.
Expenditures on development activities, whereby research finding
are applied to a plan or design for the production of new or
substantially improved products and processes, is capitalized if:
|
|
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately
identified and reliably measured, |
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, |
|
|
|
we have sufficient resources to complete development, and |
|
|
|
the intangible asset is likely to generate future economic
benefits, either because it is useful to us or through an
existing market for the intangible asset itself or for its
products. |
The expenditures capitalized include the cost of materials,
direct labor and an appropriate proportion of overhead. Other
development expenditures are recognized in the income statement
as expenses as incurred and are presented as Research and
development expenses net.
Capitalized development expenditures are stated at cost less
accumulated amortization and impairment losses.
We amortize capitalized developments costs over 5 years.
Research & development expenses in our income statement
represent the net cost of development costs that are not
capitalized, of research costs, offset by government grants
acquired for research and development.
In accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of assets, the
carrying amounts of our assets, other than inventories and
deferred tax assets, are reviewed at each balance sheet date to
determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any
such indication exists, we estimate the assets recoverable
amount. Factors we consider important by that could trigger an
impairment review include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to expected operating
results based upon historical and/or projected data, |
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business, and |
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends. |
The recoverable amount of tangible and intangible assets is the
greater of their net fair value less costs to sell and value in
use.
For cash generating units comprised of goodwill, assets that
have an indefinite useful life or intangible assets that are not
yet available for use, we estimate the recoverable amount at
each balance sheet date.
We determine the recoverable amounts by estimating future cash
flows expected from the assets or from the cash generating
units, discounted to their present value using a discount rate
that reflects current market assessments of the time value of
money and the risks specific to the asset.
We recognize an impairment loss whenever the carrying amount of
an asset exceeds its recoverable amount. For an asset that does
not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable
amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the
asset belongs.
F-30
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Impairment losses are recognized in the income statement.
Impairment losses recognized in respect of a group of non
independent assets allocated to a cash-generating unit are
allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill
allocated to cash-generating units (group of units) and then, to
reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the unit
(group of units) on a pro rata basis.
Assets classified as assets held for sale correspond to assets
for which the net book value will be recovered by a sale rather
than by its use in operations. Assets held for sale are valued
at the lower of historical cost and net realizable value.
8 Investments
and other financial assets
Investments and other financial assets include investments in
non-consolidated entities and loans and non-current receivables.
|
|
|
Investments in non-consolidated entities |
In accordance with IAS 39 Financial instruments, we
classify investments in non-consolidated companies as
available-for-sale and therefore present them on the balance
sheet at their fair value. The fair value for listed securities
is their market price at the balance sheet date. If a reliable
fair value cannot be established, securities are valued at
historical cost. We account for changes fair value directly in
shareholders equity.
|
|
|
Loans and non-current receivables |
Loans and non-current receivables are accounted for at amortized
cost.
We examine non-consolidated securities and other financial
assets at each balance sheet date to detect any objective
evidence of impairment. Where this is the case, we record an
impairment loss.
Where there is objective evidence of impairment of a financial
asset (for instance in case of significant and prolonged decline
of the value of the asset) we record an irreversible impairment
provision. This provision can only be released upon the sale of
the relevant financial asset.
9 Treasury
shares
We value treasury shares at their cost, as a reduction of
shareholders equity. Proceeds from the sale of treasury
shares are included in shareholders equity and have no
impact on the income statement.
10
Inventories
We value inventories are at the lower of cost (including direct
production costs where applicable) and net realizable value.
We calculate the cost of inventories on a weighted average price
basis for our Products segment and on a first-in first-out basis
for our Services segment.
11
Provisions
We record a provision when the Group has a present obligation
(legal or constructive) as a result of a past event for which it
is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic
benefits will be required to settle the obligation.
F-31
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
We record a provision for onerous contracts equal to the excess
of the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the
contract over the economic benefits expected to be received
under it, as estimated by the Group.
|
|
|
Pension, post-employment benefits and other post-employment
benefits |
|
|
|
Defined contribution plans |
We record obligations for contributions to defined contribution
pension plans as an expense in the income statement as incurred.
Our net obligation in respect of defined benefit pension plans
is calculated separately for each plan by estimating the amount
of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their
service in the current and prior periods; that benefit is
discounted to determine its present value, and the fair value of
any plan assets is deducted. We perform the calculation by using
the projected unit credit method.
When the benefits of a plan are increased, the portion of the
increased benefit relating to past service by employees is
recognized as an expense in the income statement on a
straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits
become vested. To the extent that the benefits vest immediately,
the expense is recognized immediately in the income statement.
We record actuarial gains and losses that arise subsequent to
January 1, 2004 directly in equity.
12 Financial
debt
Financial debt is accounted for:
|
|
|
|
|
As at the date of issuance, at the fair value of the
consideration received, less issuance fees and/or issuance
premium; |
|
|
|
subsequently, at amortized cost, corresponding to the amount at
which is assessed the financial debt at its initial accounting,
less repayments in nominal and increased or decreased of the
accumulated amortization of all differences between this
original amount and the amount at maturity; differences between
initial amount and the amount at maturity are amortized
according to the method of effective interest rate. |
As the $85 million 7.75% subordinated bonds due 2012
convertible into new ordinary shares or redeemable into new
shares and/or existing shares and/or in cash issued in 2004 are
denominated in U.S. dollars and convertible into new
ordinary shares denominated in Euros, the embedded conversion
option has been bifurcated and accounted separately within
non-current liabilities. The conversion option and the debt
component were initially recognized at fair value on issuance.
The amount of the debt component to be recorded within the
financial statements has been discounted at the rate of 10.75%,
the rate borne by comparable indebtedness without a conversion
option. As a result, we bifurcated the embedded conversion
option by
10.5 million
at the issuance as Other non-current assets. The
discounting of the debt at the issuance is accounted for as
Cost of financial debt until the maturity of the
convertible bonds.
Changes of the fair value of the embedded derivative are
recognized in the consolidated income statement in the line item
Variance on derivative convertible bonds. The fair
value of the embedded derivative has been determined using a
binomial model.
F-32
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
13 Financial
instruments
We use derivative financial instruments to hedge our exposure to
foreign exchange fluctuations (principally U.S. dollars)
from operational, financing and investment activities. In
accordance with our treasury policy, we do not hold or issue
derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. However,
derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are
accounted for as trading instruments in Other financial
income (loss).
Exchange gains or losses on foreign currency financial
instruments that represent the efficient portion of an economic
hedge of a net investment in a foreign subsidiary are reported
as translation adjustments in shareholders equity under
the line item Cumulative translation adjustments,
the inefficient portion being recognized in the income
statement. The cumulative value of foreign exchange gains and
losses recognized directly in equity will be transferred to
income statement when the net investment is sold or lost.
Derivative financial instruments are stated at fair value.
The gain or loss on reassessment to fair value is recognized
immediately in the income statement. However, where derivatives
qualify for hedge accounting, recognition of any resulting gain
or loss is as follows (cash flow hedges), we account for changes
in the fair value of the effective hedged amount in
shareholders equity. The ineffective portion is recorded
in Other financial income (loss).
14 Cash-flows
statement
The cash flows of the period are presented in the cash flow
statement within three activities: operating, investing and
financing activities:
Operating activities are the principal revenue-producing
activities of the entity and other activities that are not
investing or financing activities.
Investing activities are the acquisition and disposal of
long-term assets and other investments not included in cash
equivalents. When a subsidiary is acquired, a separate item,
corresponding to the consideration paid net of cash and cash
equivalents held par the subsidiary at the date of acquisition,
provides the cash out of the acquisition.
Financing activities are activities that result in changes in
the size and composition of the contributed equity and
borrowings of the entity. They include financial expenses cashed
out.
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents are liquid investments that are
readily convertible to known amounts of cash in less than three
months.
15
Stock-options
We include stock-options granted to employees in the financial
statements using the following principles: the stock
options fair value is determined on the grant date and is
recognized in personnel costs on a straight-line basis over the
period between the grant date and the end of the vesting period.
We calculate stock option fair value using the Black-Scholes
model.
F-33
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
16 Grants
Government grants, including non-monetary grants at fair value,
are not recognized until there is reasonable assurance that the
entity will comply with the conditions attaching to them and
that the grants will be received.
Government grants are recognized as income over the periods
necessary to match them with the related costs which they are
intended to compensate. They are presented as a reduction of the
corresponding expenses in the item Research and
development expenses, net in the income statement.
Refundable grants are presented in the balance sheet as
Other non-current liabilities.
NOTE 2 ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
For the year ended
December 31, 2005
On February 14, 2005, we ended our cooperation agreements
with PT Alico, an Indonesian company. On that date, PT Alico,
which was fully consolidated in our accounts until 2004 as a
consequence of our contractual relationship with them, was
excluded from our scope of consolidation. Under our agreements
with PT Alico, we indemnified them against certain specific
risks. This liability is limited and was accrued in the
financial statements at December 31, 2004 and at
December 31, 2005. The liability will expire on
June 30, 2006, at which date we will have no further
commitment to PT Alico or its shareholders.
On July 27, 2005, we funded a new fully owned company in
Russia named CGG Vostok. This company will undertake seismic
services activities and is consolidated.
On August 29, 2005, we acquired a controlling stake of 60%
of Exploration Resources ASA (Exploration
Resources), a Norwegian provider of marine seismic
acquisition services, at a purchase price of NOK 340 per share
corresponding to a premium of 8.3% over the last stock price of
Exploration Resources shares before the notice of the
operation (NOK 314).
We continued to acquire shares of Exploration Resources until we
acquired the totality by the end of October 2005 for an average
price excluding fees of NOK 338.27 per share: first by
acquisitions on the market; then in a combined mandatory offer
followed by a squeeze-out; then by mutual agreements with the
management of Exploration Resources that held stock-options;
eventually in a specific agreement with the minority
shareholders of Multiwave Geophysical Company ASA
(Multiwave), Exploration Resourcess subsidiary
focusing on seabed acquisition, as a consequence of the merger
of this entity with Exploration Seismic AS, a fully owned
subsidiary of Exploration Resources.
The total cost to us of the acquisition was
303.3 million,
including
8.6 million
related to acquisition fees and including the price of the
shares acquired in October 2005. The reassessment of Exploration
Resources net assets, along with a seismic business
economic perspective, led us primarily to increase the book
value of the vessels (by
115 million
at September 1, 2005) and to recognize the corresponding
deferred tax liabilities. The vessels were valued using combined
valuation methods of which, particularly, the present value of
cash flows that will be generated by the vessels.
F-34
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
On the basis of these elements, the purchase accounting for
Exploration Resources at historical rates is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in million of euros) |
|
|
|
Total acquisition of Exploration Resources shares
|
|
|
294.7 |
|
Acquisition fees
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquisition price
|
|
|
303.3 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
Fair value of fixed assets acquired
|
|
|
195.1 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities net assumed
|
|
|
(32.9 |
) |
|
Other assets and liabilities acquired
|
|
|
(73.5 |
) |
Preliminary fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
|
126.2 |
|
Preliminary goodwill
|
|
|
177.1 |
|
The reassessment of Exploration Resources assets resulted
in a preliminary goodwill of
177.1 million.
As the purchase accounting has not been finalized at
December 31, 2005, the allocation of the purchase price is
subject to change.
The results of Exploration Resources are included in our
consolidated financial statements from
September 1, 2005.
Since the date of acquisition, Exploration Resources contributed
28.8 million
to the consolidated operating revenues of CGG Group and
6.4 million
to the net consolidated income of CGG Group. If the business
combination would have occur at the beginning of the year, the
loss for the Group would have been
21.5 million
euros, mainly due to interest expense linked to the financing of
the acquisition and the operating revenues would have been
932.1 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2004
On January 2, 2004, Sercel acquired the seismic equipment
business of Thales Underwater Systems Pty Ltd. (TUS). This
business includes the development and manufacturing of surface
marine seismic acquisition systems, particularly solid
streamers, and seabed marine seismic acquisition systems. The
transaction was achieved with an immediate payment of
21.7 million
subject to a possible price adjustment which may entail an
additional payment in 2005 and/or 2006 based on revenues. The
reassessment of TUSs assets led to the recognition of
contractual rights by
11.9 million
and of development costs by
8.9 million.
As a result of this reassessment, the final goodwill amounted to
8.2 million.
On January 8, 2004, Sercel acquired a 51% majority
ownership in Hebei JunFeng Geophysical Co. Ltd., a provider of
geophones and seismic cables for the Chinese seismic market.
Hebei JunFeng Geophysical Co. Ltd., located in the Hebei
province, was originally created by BGP, the largest Chinese
geophysical services contractor. The consideration for the
transaction was
9.8 million
and generated goodwill of
0.5 million.
BGP will remain shareholder of the company along with the
management, the employees and XPEIC, a Chinese geophysical
equipment company.
On February 19, 2004, Sercel acquired Orca Instrumentation,
a French company that develops and markets marine acquisition
systems and underwater data transmission systems. The
consideration for the transaction amounted to
1.3 million.
As a result of the reassessment of Orcas assets, which led
to the recognition of development costs by
0.6 million,
the final goodwill amounted to
0.2 million.
On March 3, 2004, Sercel completed the acquisition of
Createch Industrie, a French company specialized in borehole
measurement tools, borehole seismic tools and permanent borehole
sensors. The consideration for the transaction amounted to
1.9 million.
The reassessment of Createchs assets resulted in the
recognition of
F-35
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
contractual rights of
0.4 million
and of development costs of
1.5 million
and the final goodwill amounted to
0.6 million.
On September 23, 2004, the liquidation of Kantwell Overseas
Shipping Co, which had owned the seismic vessel the CGG
Mistral (which sank in December 2002), was completed.
In October and November 2004, CGG sold 467,753 shares of the
Norwegian company Petroleum Geo Services (PGS) for
17.2 million;
the gain was
7.9 million
before and after tax and was booked as Other Revenues and
Expenses. After this sale, CGG does not own any share of
PGS.
NOTE 3 TRADE ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE
Analysis of trade accounts and notes receivables by maturity is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Trade accounts and notes receivable gross current
portion
|
|
|
240.0 |
|
|
|
159.4 |
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts and notes receivables net current
portion
|
|
|
233.8 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable gross long term
portion
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts and notes receivables net long
term portion
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable costs and accrued profit on billed
|
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts and notes receivables
|
|
|
297.5 |
|
|
|
196.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the geophysical services segment, customers are generally
large national or international oil and gas companies, which
management believes reduces potential credit risk. In the
geophysical products segment, a significant portion of sales is
paid by irrevocable letters of credit.
The Group maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based
upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers,
historical trends and other information. Credit losses have not
been material for the periods presented and have consistently
been within managements expectations.
Recoverable costs and accrued profit not billed comprise amounts
of revenue recognized under the percentage of completion method
on contracts for which billings had not been presented to the
contract owners. Such unbilled accounts receivable are generally
billed over the 30 or 60 days following the project
commencement.
The long-term receivables as of December 31, 2005 amounted
to
11.3 million
for the geophysical services segment and to
0.7 million
for the geophysical products segment. The long-term receivables
as of December 31, 2004 amounted to
9.6 million
for the geophysical services segment and to
3.5 million
for the geophysical products segment.
F-36
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTE 4 INVENTORIES AND WORK IN PROGRESS
Analysis of Inventories and work-in-progress is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Valuation | |
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation | |
|
|
|
|
Cost | |
|
Allowance | |
|
Net | |
|
Cost | |
|
Allowance | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Geophysical services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumables and spares parts
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
17.6 |
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Geophysical products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and spare parts
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
21.3 |
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
51.0 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
45.3 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
30.3 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories and work in progress
|
|
|
157.2 |
|
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
139.5 |
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The variation of Inventories and work in progress is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
Variation of the period |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
62.4 |
|
Variations
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Movements in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
Change in consolidation scope
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Change in exchange rates
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Others
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
139.5 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The additions and deductions in valuation allowances for
inventories and work-in-progress are presented in the statement
of operations as Cost of sales.
NOTE 5 OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Social and tax assets
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Fair value of financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Other miscellaneous receivables
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
Supplier prepayments
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Assets of retirement indemnity plans
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses(a)
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
includes principally prepaid rent, vessels charters. |
F-37
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTE 6 ASSETS VALUATION ALLOWANCE
Details of valuation allowances recorded against assets are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Additions/ | |
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
Deductions | |
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
beginning | |
|
charged in | |
|
|
|
at end | |
|
|
of year | |
|
income | |
|
Others(a) | |
|
of period | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Trade accounts and notes receivables
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
6.2 |
|
Inventories and work-in-progress
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Loans receivables and other investments
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets valuation allowance
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
includes the effects of exchange rates changes and changes in
the scope of consolidation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Additions/ | |
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
Deductions | |
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
beginning | |
|
charged | |
|
|
|
at end | |
|
|
of year | |
|
in income | |
|
Others(a) | |
|
of period | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Trade accounts and notes receivables
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Inventories and work-in-progress
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
15.4 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Loans receivables and other investments
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets valuation allowance
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
includes the effects of exchange rates changes and changes in
the scope of consolidation. |
NOTE 7 INVESTMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Other financial investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated investments
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Loans and
advances(a)
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Other
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
includes loans and advances to companies accounted for under the
equity method at December 31, 2005 for
6.6 million,
and at December 31, 2004 for
5.8 million. |
F-38
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Unconsolidated investments included in « Other financial
investments » are presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Tronics Microsystems SA
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Other investments in unconsolidated companies
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments in unconsolidated companies
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Groups shareholding in Tronics Microsystems S.A.
was 14.70% at December 31, 2005 and 12.45% at
December 31, 2004.
NOTE 8 INVESTMENTS IN COMPANIES UNDER EQUITY
METHOD
The variation of Investments in companies under equity
method is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
Equity in income
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Dividends received during the period, reduction in share capital
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in companies under equity method are comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Argas
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
Geomar
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
JV Xian Peic/ Sercel Limited
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
VS Fusion LLC
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in companies under the equity method
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in companies under the equity method are presented
at December 31, 2005 in the balance sheet as
Investments in companies under the equity method by
44.4 million
in assets and as Provisions non-current
portion by
0.5 million
in liabilities.
F-39
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
The net contribution to equity of affiliates accounted for under
the equity method is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Argas
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
Geomar
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
JV Xian Peic/ Sercel Limited
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
VS Fusion LLC
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key figures relating to Argass financial statements
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Current assets
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Non current liabilities
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Gross revenue
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
Income from continuing operations before extraordinary items and
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Analysis of Property, plant and equipment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
depreciation | |
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
depreciation | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros) | |
Land
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
|
|
27.7 |
|
Machinery & equipment
|
|
|
457.0 |
|
|
|
(295.9 |
) |
|
|
161.1 |
|
|
|
339.7 |
|
|
|
(259.3 |
) |
|
|
80.4 |
|
Vehicles & vessels
|
|
|
373.1 |
|
|
|
(104.3 |
) |
|
|
268.8 |
|
|
|
159.2 |
|
|
|
(79.0 |
) |
|
|
80.2 |
|
Other tangible assets
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
(25.9 |
) |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
9.5 |
|
Assets under constructions
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
936.0 |
|
|
|
(455.9 |
) |
|
|
480.1 |
|
|
|
591.6 |
|
|
|
(387.5 |
) |
|
|
204.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, seismic equipments no longer in use and held to be
sold were reclassified as Assets held for sale for
3.5 million
at December 31, 2005. The seismic equipments were sold in
February 2006 for
5.0 million.
F-40
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Included in Property, plant and equipment are land, buildings
and geophysical equipment recorded under capital leases as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
depreciation | |
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
depreciation | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros) | |
Land and buildings under capital leases
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
Geophysical equipment and vessels under capital leases
|
|
|
101.7 |
|
|
|
(25.5 |
) |
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
8.6 |
|
Other tangible assets under capital leases
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property, plant and equipment under capital lease
|
|
|
108.1 |
|
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
81.9 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2005, the time charter party agreement of the seismic vessel
Geochallenger has been qualified as a capital lease.
The total lease obligation is U.S.$36.2 million
(30.7 million)
over 5 years plus a residual value amounting to NOK
230 million
(30 million).
Part of this lease obligation is operating expenses and the net
present value of the future lease payments under capital lease
(including the residual value) is only U.S.$54.8 million
(46.5 million).
In April 2005, the time charter party agreement of the seismic
vessel Laurentian has been renewed with modified
contractual conditions. As a result, it has been qualified as a
capital lease. The total lease obligation is
U.S.$27.8 million
(23.6 million)
over 3 years plus a residual value amounting to
U.S.$7.3 million
(6.2 million).
Part of this lease obligation is operating expenses and the net
present value of the future lease payments under capital lease
(including the residual value) is only U.S.$16.8 million
(14.2 million).
In 2004, the seismic vessels Föhn and
Harmattan and one chase boat were included in
purchases of assets recorded under capital leases for a total
amount of
8.7 million.
Depreciation of assets recorded under capital leases is
determined on the same basis as assets owned and is included in
depreciation expense.
Included in assets recorded under capital leases are land and
buildings of one of the Groups French offices in Massy,
which were sold under a sale and leaseback agreement in 1990.
The assets are maintained at their original cost and the
buildings continue to be depreciated over their initial
estimated useful lives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
Variation of the period |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
204.1 |
|
|
|
215.8 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
Acquisitions through capital lease
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(67.9 |
) |
|
|
(58.0 |
) |
Disposals
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
Change in consolidation scope
|
|
|
195.1 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
480.1 |
|
|
|
204.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in consolidation scope corresponds to the acquisition
of Exploration Resources.
F-41
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Reconciliation of acquisitions with the cash-flow statement and
capital expenditures in note 18 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
Acquisitions of tangible assets (excluding capital
lease) see above
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
Development costs capitalized see note 19
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Additions in other tangible assets (excluding non-exclusive
surveys) see note 10
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Variance of fixed assets suppliers
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases of tangible and intangible assets according
to cash-flow statement
|
|
|
117.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions through capital lease see above
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
Increase in multi-clients surveys see note 10
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
Less variance of fixed assets
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures according to note 18
|
|
|
167.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repairs and maintenance expenses
Repairs and maintenance expenses included in cost of operations
amounted to
22.5 million
in 2005 and
18.3 million
in 2004.
NOTE 10 GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Analysis of Goodwill and Intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
depreciation | |
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
depreciation | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros) | |
Goodwill of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
252.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252.9 |
|
|
|
62.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.5 |
|
Multi-clients surveys
|
|
|
568.4 |
|
|
|
(474.8 |
) |
|
|
93.6 |
|
|
|
510.8 |
|
|
|
(386.3 |
) |
|
|
124.5 |
|
Development costs capitalized
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
18.3 |
|
Software
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Goodwill and Intangible assets
|
|
|
896.0 |
|
|
|
(506.8 |
) |
|
|
389.2 |
|
|
|
635.7 |
|
|
|
(410.5 |
) |
|
|
225.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
Variation of the period |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
225.2 |
|
|
|
217.3 |
|
Additions in goodwill
|
|
|
177.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Increase in multi-clients surveys
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
Development costs capitalized
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Others acquisitions
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Depreciation on multi-client surveys
|
|
|
(69.6 |
) |
|
|
(66.5 |
) |
Other depreciation
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Change in consolidation scope
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
Other
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
389.2 |
|
|
|
225.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The additions in goodwill in 2005, corresponds to the
preliminary goodwill of the acquisition of Exploration Resources
; this goodwill has been allocated, based on business plans, to
cash generated units SBU Offshore and SBU Processing for
U.S.$183.6 million and U.S.$32.4 million respectively.
The result of the different impairment tests performed as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 is that no impairment charge was
recorded in either year.
In 2005, the main impairment tests that were performed for the
following cash generating units were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the Product segment level: test of the net book value of the
goodwill |
|
|
|
the Offshore SBU: test of the historical multi-client library
net book value and of the tangible assets net book value, which
results notably from the 2001 Aker purchase accounting, from the
assets acquired in 2005 Exploration Resources purchase
accounting and of the goodwill, corresponding mainly to the
goodwill booked from Exploration Resources purchase accounting
in 2005 |
|
|
|
the Processing SBU: test of the goodwill, corresponding mainly
to the goodwill booked from Exploration Resources purchase
accounting in 2005 |
|
|
|
the Land SBU level: test of the net book value of assets. |
For the tests of Products segment, the Offshore SBU and the
Processing SBU, the recoverable value was determined based on
discounted expected cash-flows with the following parameters:
|
|
|
|
|
forecasted cash-flows estimated in 5-years business plans deemed
on the basis of the average medium term exchange rate
1 equals
U.S.$1.25; and |
|
|
|
discount ratios corresponding to the respective sector weighted
average cost of capital (WACC): |
|
|
|
|
|
8.83% for the Product segment (corresponding to a pre-tax rate
of 13.62%); |
|
|
|
8.29% for the multi-client library (corresponding to a pre-tax
rate of 12.09%); |
|
|
|
8.44% for the whole Offshore SBU (corresponding to a pre-tax
rate of 19.82%); and |
|
|
|
8.67% for the Processing SBU (corresponding to a pre-tax rate of
14.45%). |
F-43
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
For the test of the Land SBU, the recoverable value was
determined by an assessment of the market value of the long-term
assets by an independent expert.
NOTE 11 OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
The analysis of other current liabilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Deferred income
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Value added tax and other taxes payable
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Fair value of financial instruments
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12 FINANCIAL DEBT
Analysis of long-term debt by type is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
|
|
|
Current | |
|
current | |
|
Total | |
|
Current | |
|
current | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Outstanding bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146.3 |
|
|
|
146.3 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
154.9 |
|
|
|
210.0 |
|
Bank loans
|
|
|
135.9 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
164.7 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
87.4 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
156.0 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
398.4 |
|
|
|
70.2 |
|
|
|
176.5 |
|
|
|
246.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
157.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of financial debt by currency is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Euro
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
385.6 |
|
|
|
226.0 |
|
Other currencies
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
398.4 |
|
|
|
246.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Analysis of financial debt by interest rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of | |
|
|
euros) | |
Variable rates (effective rate December 31, 2005: 7.60%,
2004: 2.76%)
|
|
|
156.6 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
Fixed rates (effective rate December 31, 2005: 7.06%, 2004:
11.07%)
|
|
|
241.8 |
|
|
|
231.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
398.4 |
|
|
|
246.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rates generally are based on inter-bank
offered rates of the related currency. The weighted average
interest rate on bank overdrafts was 7.81% and 9.17% at
December 31, 2005 and 2004 respectively.
The impact of hedging instruments has not been considered in the
above two tables.
Outstanding Bonds
High Yield bonds
(105/8%
Senior Notes, maturity 2007)
On November 17, 2000, the Company issued
U.S.$170 million aggregate principal amount of
105/8%
Senior Notes due 2007 in the international capital markets. The
net proceeds (U.S.$164.9 million) was used to repay a
portion of outstanding indebtedness under the existing
syndicated credit facility and to fund the cash portion of the
purchase price of two marine seismic vessels and certain seismic
data from an affiliate of Aker (U.S.$25 million). A
standard covenant package is attached to the bond, with a main
incurrence test of coverage of interest expense by cash flow
from operations. The Group was in compliance with the bond
covenants on the date of issue, and at December 31, 2004.
On February 5, 2002, the Company issued in addition to the
bonds issued on November 2000, bonds in a total principal amount
of U.S.$55 million, with a maturity date in 2007 and with
an annual fixed rate of
105/8%.
On January 26, 2005, the Company partially redeemed its
105/8%
Senior Notes, up to a principal amount of U.S.$75 million.
According to the indenture governing those notes, a premium
representing 5.3125% of the total redemption amount,
(U.S.$4.0 million) plus accrued interest were paid. The
total cost of such redemption for the Company was therefore
U.S.$79 million plus accrued interest of
U.S.$1.3 million.
On May 31, 2005, the Company became liable for the
remaining $150 million of
105/8%
Senior Notes due 2007. According to the indenture governing
those notes, a premium representing 5.3125% of the total
redemption amount, (U.S.$8.0 million). The premium and the
write-off of the remaining deferred issuance cost linked to this
redemption as well as the overlapped interests on the month of
May 2005 amounted to
9.4 million
and were recognized in the income statement as Cost of
financial debt for the year ended December 31, 2005.
High Yield bonds
(71/2%
Senior Notes, maturity 2015)
On April 28, 2005, the Company issued U.S.$165 million
of
71/2%
Senior Notes due 2015. The net proceeds were used to redeem and
pay accrued interest on all outstanding aggregate principal of
our existing
105/8%
Senior Notes due 2007, on May 31, 2005 (see above).
Those bonds include some covenants, specifically on capital
expenditures, additional indebtedness subscriptions, pledges
arrangements, sales and lease-back transactions, issuance and
sale of equity instruments and dividends payments by certain
subsidiaries of the Group.
All those covenant are complied with as at December 31,
2005.
F-45
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Convertible bonds (7.75%,
due 2012)
On November 4, 2004 the Company issued 14,000 subordinated
bonds in favor of Onex Partners LP, Onex American Holdings II
LLC, Onex US Principals LP and CGG Executive Invesco, LLC, with
maturity of 2012, in a total nominal amount of U.S.$84,980,000,
convertible into new ordinary shares or redeemable in new shares
and/or existing shares and/or in cash (the Bonds),
at an interest rate of 7.75%.
The terms of the convertible bonds were amended as approved by
the General Meeting of bondholders held on November 2,
2005, and approved by a General Meeting of CGG shareholders held
on November 16, 2005. The early conversion period was open
from November 17 to November 18 2005, inclusive. At the
conclusion of the conversion period, 11,475 convertible bonds
due 2012 were converted, leading to the issuance of
1,147,500 new shares. 2,525 convertible bonds remain
outstanding representing a nominal value of $15.3 million.
The Group paid a total premium of $10.4 million
(8.9 million)
to the bondholders who converted its bonds. This premium has
been recognized as a charge under the line item Other
financial income (loss) in the income statement for the
year ended December 31, 2005. In addition, the write-off of
the deferred issuance costs linked to this redemption amounted
to
3.7 million
and has been recognized as a charge under the line item
Other financial income (loss) in the income
statement for the year ended December 31, 2005.
A component of our convertible bonds due 2012 denominated in US
dollars constitutes an embedded derivative as the shares to be
issued upon conversion are denominated in Euro. A portion of the
issuance proceeds was deemed to relate to the fair value of the
derivative on issuance and subsequent changes in fair value of
the derivative are recorded through earnings. The allocation of
a portion of the proceeds to the derivative created a discount
on issuance that is being amortized to earnings over the life of
the bonds.
The fair value of the embedded derivative has been determined
using a binomial model. The fair value increased from
10.4 million
at the initial recognition of the debt to
33.9 million
at December 31, 2004, then to
11.3 million
at December, 31, 2005.
The variance on 2005 fiscal year corresponds, on one hand, to
the increase in the value of the derivative of
11.5 million
and, on the other hand, to the reclassification of
34.1 million
in reserves for the portion of the derivative related to the
bonds that were early converted on November 17, 2005.
The global increase in the value of the derivative of
11.5 million
covers a
6.3 million
increase in the value of the derivative related to the 11 475
bonds effectively converted in shares in November 2005 and a
5.2 million
increase in the value of the derivative related to the 2 525
convertible bonds outstanding at December 31, 2005. Those
increases in the value of the derivative are mainly explained by
the strengthening of the US dollar against the Euro and the
increase in the CGG share price, being acknowledged that, as
regards the derivative related to the bonds effectively
converted in November 2005, the value was reduced by the
time-component as a result of the conversion in shares, for an
amount of
8.9 million.
This resulted in aggregate expense of
11.5 in the year
ended December 31, 2005 and of
23.5 million
in the year ended December 31, 2004, accounted for as
Variance on derivative on convertible bonds in the
income statement.
The main assumptions used for the year-end valuation are an
implicit volatility of 27% and a credit-risk premium of 4.5% at
December 31, 2004 and an implicit volatility of 37% and a
credit-risk premium of 3.4% at December 31, 2005.
The indenture of the Bonds states that, in case of fundamental
change (shares or American depositary shares ceasing to be
listed on the New York Stock Exchange, sale of a substantial
part of the assets of the Company, liquidation or dissolution of
the Company, change of control of the Company), any bondholder
may require the Company to redeem its Bonds and to pay, in
addition to the principal amount of the Bonds, an amount equal
to the amount of basic interest at a rate of 7.75% that would
have accrued on the Bonds until maturity for a maximum period of
five years. This provision may trigger a payment by the Company
of a maximum of
F-46
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
U.S.$6 million in additional interest. At December 31,
2004 and at December 31, 2005, no expense related to this
clause was booked since its realization is unlikely.
Bank loans
At December 31, 2005,
153.3 million
of bank loans were secured by tangible assets and receivables.
At December 31, 2005, the Group had
9.2 million
available in unused short-term credit lines and overdraft
facilities and
50.9 million
in unused long-term credit lines.
U.S.$375 million bridge
loan (used credit line and presented as bank loans
current portion)
On September 1, 2005, we entered into a single currency
U.S.$375 million term credit facility, which was amended on
September 30, 2005, with Crédit Suisse, Paris Branch
and BNP Paribas as arrangers, with a maturity date at
September 1st, 2006 with the option (upon our request and
upon approval of a majority of the lenders) to extend it for a
further six months. The use of proceeds for this credit facility
was to fund our initial purchase of 60% of Exploration Resources
shares, our continuing purchases of Exploration Resources
shares, our mandatory offer for the purchase of the remaining
Exploration Resources shares and the squeeze out of
remaining shareholders.
The credit facility bears interest at a graduated rate beginning
with a base margin, depending on the credit rating assigned by
either Moodys or Standard & Poors to our
outstanding U.S.$165 million
71/2%
senior notes due 2015 (4.25% at BB-/ Ba3 or higher, 5.25% at B+/
B1, 5.75% at B/ B2 and 6.25% at B-/ B3 or lower), over US$ LIBOR
until March 1t, 2006, plus 0.50% from March 1, 2006 until
June 1, 2006, plus 1.00% from June 1, 2006 until
September 1st, 2006 plus 2.00% from September 1, 2006
until the repayment. The interest expense represents
10.4 million
on the year ended December 31, 2005.
In order to comply with the conditions of the acquisitions of
Exploration Resources shares noted above, we obtained waivers
from the lenders under our U.S.$60 million syndicated
credit facility dated March 12, 2004 of the negative pledge
and any other relevant provisions thereunder, as well as
amendments to the financial covenants (see below).
As a consequence of the capital increase dated December 16,
2005, we repaid, on December 23, 2005, $234.7 million
of the $375 million which had been drawn on this credit
facility. The unamortized portion of the deferred expenditures
linked to this redemption amounted to
3.8 million
and were recognized in the income statement as Cost of
financial debt at December 31, 2005. At
December 31, 2005, we have drawn down $140.3 million
(118.9 million),
which was effectively repaid on February 10, 2006 as stated
note 28
Post-closing
events.
We agreed to maintain some provisions under the bridge loan
agreement: those were respected at December 31, 2005 and
were invalid and void from February 10, 2006.
Syndicated credit facility
(unused long-term credit line)
On March 12, 2004, CGG, CGG Marine and Sercel signed a
revolving credit facility agreement of U.S.$60 million with
banks and financial institutions acting as lenders. The purpose
of this agreement was notably to replace the multi currency
facility agreement dated September 15, 1999 as amended on
August 31, 2000, which was cancelled.
This credit facility agreement requires that certain ratios
should be respected. Those ratios have been recently modified
when the U.S.$375 million credit facility agreement was
signed on September 1, 2005 (see
F-47
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
above), by a waiver dated August 31, 2005 and approved by
the lenders. The new ratios to be respected, calculated from
consolidated financial statements of the Group are the
followings:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the ratio of net debt over equity should not exceed 2.50; |
|
|
(b) |
the ratio of net debt over Adjusted EBITDA (ORBDA) should
not exceed (i) 2.00 on the 12 months periods ending
December 31, 2003, June 30, 2004 and December 31,
2004, (ii) 1.75 on the 12 months periods ending
June 30, 2005, (iii) 2.50 on the 12 months period
preceding December 31, 2005 and (iv) 2.00 on the
following 12 months periods; and |
|
|
(c) |
the ratio of net debt (in USD at closing rate) over cash-flow
from operations on a rolling 12 months period calculated at
average rate of the period should not exceed (i) 4.00 on
the 12 months periods ending December 31, 2003 and
June 30, 2004, (ii) 3.75 on the 12 months periods
ending December 31, 2004, (iii) 3.50 on the
12 months period ending June 30, 2005, (iv) 3.00
on the following 12 months periods. |
The ratios calculated at December 31, 2005 met the
conditions required.
The lenders were granted a lien on the accounts receivable of
CGG, CGG Marine and Sercel S.A. The facility has a term of three
years and will begin amortizing after March 11, 2006, one
year from its final maturity.
NOTE 13 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Foreign currency exposure management
The reporting currency for the Groups consolidated
financial statements is the euro. However, as a result of having
primarily customers, which operate in the oil and gas industry,
more than 90% of the Groups operating revenues are
denominated in currencies other than the euro, primarily the
U.S. dollar.
As a result, the Groups sales and operating income are
exposed to the effects of fluctuations in the value of the euro
versus the U.S. dollar. A strengthening of the euro
compared to the U.S. dollar has a negative effect on the
Groups net sales and operating income denominated in
U.S. dollars when translated to euro, while a weakening of
the euro has a positive effect. In addition, the Groups
exposure to fluctuations in the euro/ U.S. dollar exchange
rate has considerably increased over the last few years due to
increased sales outside of Europe.
In order to improve the balance of its net position of
receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies, the
Group maintains a portion of its financing in U.S. dollars.
At December 31, 2005 and at December 31, 2004, the
Groups financial debt denominated in U.S. dollars
amounted to U.S.$454.9 million
(385.6 million)
and U.S.$307.8 million
(226.0 million),
respectively.
In addition, to protect against the reduction in the value of
future foreign currency cash flows. the Group follows a policy
of selling U.S. dollars forward at average contract
maturity dates that the Group attempts to match with future net
U.S. dollar cash flows (revenues less costs in
U.S. dollars) to be generated by firm contract commitments
in its backlog generally over the ensuing six months. A similar
policy, to a lesser extent, is carried out with respect to
contracts denominated in British pounds. This foreign currency
risk management strategy has enabled the Group to reduce, but
not eliminate, the positive or negative effects of exchange
movements with respect to these currencies.
F-48
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Details of forward exchange contracts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Forward sales of U.S. dollars against euros
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount (in millions of US$)
|
|
|
183.6 |
|
|
|
127.0 |
|
|
of which forward sales qualifying as cash-flow
hedges
|
|
|
183.6 |
|
|
|
108.4 |
|
|
of which forward sales not qualifying as cash-flow
hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
Weighted average maturity
|
|
|
91 days |
|
|
|
96 days |
|
Weighted average forward U.S.$/ Euro exchange rate
|
|
|
1.2048 |
|
|
|
1.2453 |
|
Forward sales of U.S. dollars against British pounds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount (in millions of US$)
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which forward sales qualifying as cash-flow
hedges
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which forward sales not qualifying as cash-flow
hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average maturity
|
|
|
90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average forward U.S.$/£ exchange rate
|
|
|
1.8871 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of forward exchange contracts on financial statement are
as follows:
Interest rate risk management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
Carrying value of forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
8.9 |
|
Fair value of forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
8.9 |
|
Gains recognized in profit and loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Losses recognized in profit and loss
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gains recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Losses recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
No interest rate cap agreement was subscribed during 2005 and
there is no outstanding former agreement at December 31,
2005.
Fair value information
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Groups
financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
amount | |
|
value | |
|
amount | |
|
value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
Bank overdraft facilities
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Bank loans, vendor equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
financing and shareholder loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate
|
|
|
156.6 |
|
|
|
156.6 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
|
241.8 |
|
|
|
244.0 |
|
|
|
231.7 |
|
|
|
254.8 |
|
Forward currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
F-49
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
The Group considers the carrying value for loans receivable and
other investments. trade accounts and notes receivable. other
receivables. trade accounts and notes payable and other current
liabilities to be the most representative estimate of fair value.
For bank loans with fixed interest rates, the fair values have
been estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the
Groups incremental borrowing rates for similar types of
borrowing arrangements. For variable-rate bank loans, vendor
equipment financing and the shareholder loans, fair values
approximate carrying values.
The market value of forward sales is assessed based on forward
rates, available on financial market for similar maturities.
NOTE 14 COMMON STOCK AND STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Companys share capital at December 31, 2005
consisted of 17,081,680 shares, each with a nominal value of
2.
Dividend rights
Dividends may be distributed from the statutory retained
earnings, subject to the requirements of French law and the
Companys articles of incorporation. Retained earnings
available for distribution amounted to
399.8 million
at December 31, 2005.
Issued Shares
In 2005, CGG issued 5.399.462 fully paid shares related to the
following operations:
|
|
|
|
|
152.834 fully paid shares related to stock options exercised for
which the company received net proceeds of
8.2 million; |
|
|
|
1.147.500 fully paid ordinary shares issued on the conversion of
11,475 convertibles bonds out of the convertible bonds issued on
November 4, 2004 with maturity date 2012 and; |
|
|
|
4.099.128 fully paid ordinary shares issued on the capital
increase completed between November 21, 2005 and
December 2, 2005 at a share price of
51 for which the
company received gross proceeds of
209.1 million.
The fees and costs related to this transaction amounted to
9.4 million. |
Stock options
Pursuant to various resolutions adopted by the Board of
Directors, the Group has granted options to purchase Ordinary
Shares to certain employees, executive officers and directors of
the Group.
Stock-options granted on 1997 expired on May 4, 2005.
Options granted under the provisions of the 2000 option plan
which expires eight years from the date of grant cannot be
generally exercised before 2003 and the options to subscribe
1,000 shares or more cannot be exercised before January 18,
2005. Options granted under the provisions of the 2001 option
plan, which expires eight years from the date of grant, are
vested by one fifth each year from March 2001 and cannot be
generally exercised before 2004 and the options to subscribe
1,000 shares or more cannot be exercised before January 18,
2005. The exercise price for each option is the average fair
market value for the common stock during the 20 trading days
ending on the trading day next preceding the date the option is
granted. Options granted under the 2002 option plan, which
expires eight years from the date of grant, are vested by one
fifth each year from May 2002 and cannot be generally exercised
before 2005. Moreover, options to subscribe 1,000 shares or more
cannot be exercised before May 15, 2006.
F-50
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Following the capital increase of December 2005, the stock
options were adjusted as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment of | |
|
Exercise price | |
|
Adjusted | |
Date of stock options |
|
number of options | |
|
before adjustment () | |
|
exercise price () | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
January 18, 2000
|
|
|
9.387 |
|
|
|
49.90 |
|
|
|
45.83 |
|
March 14, 2001
|
|
|
21.376 |
|
|
|
71.20 |
|
|
|
65.39 |
|
May 15, 2002
|
|
|
11.466 |
|
|
|
43.47 |
|
|
|
39.92 |
|
May 15, 2003
|
|
|
15.583 |
|
|
|
15.82 |
|
|
|
14.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
57.812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information related to options outstanding at December 31,
2005 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Board of |
|
|
|
outstanding at | |
|
Exercise price | |
|
|
|
Remaining | |
Directors Resolution |
|
Options granted | |
|
Dec. 31. 2005 | |
|
per share () | |
|
Expiration date | |
|
duration | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
January 18. 2000
|
|
|
231.000 |
|
|
|
124.736 |
|
|
|
45.83 |
|
|
|
January 17, 2008 |
|
|
|
24.5 months |
|
March 14. 2001
|
|
|
256.000 |
|
|
|
251.463 |
|
|
|
65.39 |
|
|
|
March 13, 2009 |
|
|
|
38.5 months |
|
May 15. 2002
|
|
|
138.100 |
|
|
|
135.400 |
|
|
|
39.92 |
|
|
|
May 14, 2010 |
|
|
|
52.5 months |
|
May 15. 2003
|
|
|
169.900 |
|
|
|
180.235 |
|
|
|
14.53 |
|
|
|
May 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
64.5 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
795.000 |
|
|
|
691.834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, there was a 100,000 options plan dated May 5,
1997 expiring on maturity date May 4, 2005. At
January 1, 2005, there were 56,662 outstanding unexercised
options at an exercise price of
61.03. At the
expiration date, 54,520 options were exercised over the
accumulated duration of the plan, thus 14,432 options became
void definitely due to its expiration.
A summary of the Companys stock option activity, and
related information for the years ended December 31 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
exercise | |
|
Number of | |
|
exercise | |
|
|
options | |
|
price | |
|
options | |
|
price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(weighted average exercise price in euro) | |
Outstanding-beginning of year
|
|
|
809.050 |
|
|
|
48.95 |
|
|
|
815.673 |
|
|
|
48.86 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments followings the capital increase
|
|
|
57.812 |
|
|
|
43.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(152.834 |
) |
|
|
53.86 |
|
|
|
(1.500 |
) |
|
|
15.82 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(22.194 |
) |
|
|
55.61 |
|
|
|
(5.123 |
) |
|
|
44.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding-end of year
|
|
|
691.834 |
|
|
|
43.63 |
|
|
|
809.050 |
|
|
|
48.95 |
|
Exercisable-end of year
|
|
|
376.199 |
|
|
|
58.90 |
|
|
|
56.662 |
|
|
|
61.03 |
|
F-51
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTE 15 PROVISIONS FOR LIABILITIES AND CHARGES
Detail of provisions for liabilities and charges is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
31 December, |
|
|
|
Deductions |
|
Deductions |
|
|
|
31 December, |
|
|
2004 |
|
Additions |
|
(used) |
|
(non used) |
|
Others(a) |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
Provisions for contacts losses
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Provisions for restructuring costs
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Provisions for litigations
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
Provisions for exchange losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others provisions
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
Total short-term provisions
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Customers Guarantee provisions
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Retirement indemnity provisions
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Others provisions
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Negative value of investments in companies under the equity
method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Total long-term provisions
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Total provisions
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
(a) |
includes the effects of exchange rates changes and acquisitions
and divestitures |
Negative value of investments in companies under the equity
method
The negative value of VSF, a company accounted under the equity
method, is presented at December 31, 2005 as
Provisions non-current portion by
0.5 million.
Retirement indemnity provisions
The Group records retirement indemnity provisions based on the
following actuarial assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
historical staff turnover and standard mortality schedule; |
|
|
|
age of retirement between 60 and 65 years old; and |
|
|
|
actuarial rate and average rate of increase in future
compensation. |
In addition, a supplemental pension and retirement plan was
implemented in December 2004 for the members of the Groups
Management Committee and members of the management board of
Sercel Holding; a contribution on this pension plan was paid for
2.1 million
in 2005.
F-52
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
The status of the retirement indemnity plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Accumulated benefit obligation (unvested)
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Effect of changes in discount rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Amortization of loss arising from change in discount rate
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense of the year
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Consolidation scope entries & currency translation
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net changes
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Contributions paid
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Consolidation scope entries & currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net changes
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Net liability at end of the year
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Net asset at end of the year
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Key assumptions used in estimating the Groups retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
obligations are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
Average rate of increase in future compensation
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
Average expected return on assets
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
NOTE 16 OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Research and development subsidies
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Profit sharing scheme
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 17 CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Contractual obligations
The Group leases primarily land, buildings and geophysical
equipment under capital lease agreements expiring at various
dates during the next five years. These capital lease
commitments include the sale-leaseback agreement with respect to
the Groups head office in Massy, for which we committed in
June 2005 to exercise the purchase option in 2006.
F-53
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
We renewed the time charter party agreement of our seismic
vessel, the Laurentian, in April 2005 with modified contractual
conditions. As a result, it was qualified as a capital lease and
was reported as such at June 30, 2005. The total lease
obligation is U.S.$27.8 million
(23.6 million)
over its three-year term plus a residual value of
U.S.$7.3 million
(6.2 million).
The net present value of future lease payments under the capital
lease is U.S.$16.8 million
(14.2 million)
and the remaining part of the obligation is accounted for as
operating expenses over the agreement duration. This amount,
less the estimated residual value of U.S.$7.3 million
(6.2 million)
will be depreciated over the agreement duration. Likewise, the
time charter party agreement of the Geochallenger seismic
vessel, included in Exploration Resources assets at
September 1, 2005, has been accounted for as a capital
lease. The total lease obligation is U.S.$36.2 million
(30.7 million)
over its five-year term plus a residual value of NOK
230 million
(30 million).
The net present value of future lease payments under the capital
lease is U.S.$54.8 million
(46.5 million)
and the remaining part of the obligation is accounted for as
operating expenses over the agreement duration. This amount will
be depreciated over the agreement duration. Since April 1999,
the Group has been operating the seismic vessel Alizé
under a long-term charter agreement signed on
December 31, 1998, valid for a period of eight years. In
2004, three lease agreements regarding two seismic vessels
(Föhn and Harmattan) and one chase
boat were qualified as capital leases and recorded as such for a
total amount of
8.7 million
in the balance sheet.
Other lease agreements relate primarily to operating leases for
offices, computer equipment and other items of personal property.
Rental expense was
59.6 million
in 2005 and
61.2 million
in 2004.
The following table presents payments in future periods relating
to contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
|
|
1 year | |
|
1-3 years | |
|
4-5 years | |
|
5 years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in million of euros) | |
Long-term debt (Note 12)
|
|
|
135.7 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
147.3 |
|
|
|
310.8 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
100.6 |
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
105.9 |
|
Other Long-term Obligations (bond interest)
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
222.6 |
|
|
|
116.1 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
225.4 |
|
|
|
622.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation between capital lease obligations and capital
lease debt is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
|
|
1 year | |
|
1-5 years | |
|
5 years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
100.6 |
|
Discounting
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
Capital lease debt (see note 12)
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
87.4 |
|
F-54
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Other commitments
Outstanding commitments at December 31, 2005 include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Guarantees issued in favor of clients
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
Guarantees issued in favor of banks
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
Notes receivable discounted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
guarantees(a)
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
122.9 |
|
|
|
110.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Other guarantees relate primarily to guarantees issued by the
Company on behalf of subsidiaries and affiliated companies in
favor of customs or other governmental administrations. |
The guarantees issued in favor of clients relates mainly to the
guarantees issued by the Company to support bids made at the
subsidiaries level.
The increase in guarantees in favor of banks relates mainly to
new credit facilities entered into.
Other guarantees represent essentially the guarantees given to
the Libyan customs authorities for the temporary admission of
our seismic vessels in Libyan waters.
The only significant commitment for capital expenditures at
December 31, 2005 was the process of conversion of the
Geo-Challenger from a cable laying vessel to a 3D
seismic vessel for U.S.$27 million
(22.8 million).
The duration of the guarantees is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due date | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
|
|
1 year | |
|
1-3 years | |
|
4-5 years | |
|
5 years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
|
|
Guarantees issued in favor of clients
|
|
|
69.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
Guarantees issued in favor of banks
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
Other guarantees
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
103.2 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Groups agreements for the disposal of
certain activities contain customary, reciprocal warranties and
indemnities.
The Group has no off-balance sheet obligations under IFRS that
are not described above.
Legal proceedings, claims and other contingencies
The Group is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business and has various
unresolved claims pending. The outcome of these lawsuits and
claims is not known at this time. The Group believes that the
resulting liability, if any, net of amounts recoverable from
insurance or other sources. will not have a material adverse
effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial
position or cash flows.
The Company has been sued by Parexpro (Portugal), for
termination without cause of employment agreements and
solicitation of a significant number of highly qualified staff
in the field of reservoir evaluation, misappropriation of
confidential information and documentation, clients, and loss of
profits resulting therefrom.
F-55
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
In June 2005, Lisbon Appeal Court confirmed the decision of
Lisbon Commercial Court and, in July 2005, Parexpro introduced a
new assignation on the Lisbon Civil Court, aiming the same
persons and companies on the same basis.
This new action is currently processed by Lisbon Civil Court.
The Company does not expect this claim to have any material
impact on the Groups results of operation, financial
position, or cash flows. Thus, no provision was recorded in the
consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 18 ANALYSIS BY OPERATING SEGMENT AND
GEOGRAPHIC ZONE
The following tables present revenues, operating income and
identifiable assets by operating segment, revenues by geographic
zone (by origin) as well as net sales by geographic zone based
on the location of the customer. The Group principally services
the oil and gas exploration and production industry and
currently operates in two industry segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Geophysical services, which consist of (i) land seismic
acquisition, (ii) marine seismic acquisition,
(iii) other geophysical acquisition, including activities
not exclusively linked to oilfield services, and (iv) data
processing, and data management; |
|
|
|
Geophysical products, which consist of the manufacture and sale
of equipment involved in seismic data acquisition, such as
recording and transmission equipment and vibrators for use in
land seismic acquisition. and software development and sales. |
Inter-company sales between the two segments are made at prices
approximating market prices and relate primarily to equipment
sales made by the geophysical products segment to the
geophysical services segment. These inter-segment sales, the
related operating income recognized by the geophysical products
segment, and the related effect on capital expenditures and
depreciation expense of the geophysical services segment are
eliminated in consolidation and presented in the column
Eliminations and Adjustments in the tables that
follow.
Operating income represents operating revenues and other
operating income less expenses of the relevant industry segment.
It includes non-recurring and unusual items, which are disclosed
in the operating segment if material. General corporate
expenses, which include Group management, financing, and legal
activities, have been included in the column Eliminations
and Adjustments in the tables that follow. The Group does
not disclose financial expenses or revenues by operating segment
because these items are not followed by the segment management
and because financing and investment are mainly managed at the
corporate level.
Identifiable assets are those used in the operations of each
industry segment and geographic zone. Unallocated and corporate
assets consist primarily of financial assets, including cash and
cash equivalents, and the Groups corporate headquarters in
Massy.
Net sales originating in France include export sales of
189 million
in 2005 and
231 million
in 2004.
In 2005, the Groups two most significant customers
accounted for 9.8% and 4.4% of the Groups consolidated
revenues compared with 6.8% and 5.4% in 2004.
F-56
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Analysis by operating segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geophysical | |
|
Geophysical | |
|
Eliminations and | |
|
Consolidated | |
2005 |
|
services | |
|
products | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
|
552.3 |
|
|
|
317.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
869.9 |
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
(61.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
552.9 |
|
|
|
378.8 |
|
|
|
(61.8 |
) |
|
|
869.9 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
554.8 |
|
|
|
378.8 |
|
|
|
(61.8 |
) |
|
|
871.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
|
|
|
(29.9 |
)(a) |
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (loss) of investees
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Capital
expenditures(b)
|
|
|
165.5 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
167.5 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization(c)
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
145.9 |
|
Corporate assets amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in companies under equity method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
1,105.4 |
|
|
|
412.7 |
|
|
|
(113.4 |
) |
|
|
1,404.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated and corporate assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,565.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which equity method companies
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable liabilities
|
|
|
575.5 |
|
|
|
179.8 |
|
|
|
(59.5 |
) |
|
|
695.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated and corporate liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes general corporate expenses of
15.8 million. |
|
(b) |
Includes (i) investments in multi-clients surveys of
31.9 million,
(ii) equipment acquired under capital lease of
17.4 million,
(iii) capitalized development costs in the Services segment
of
3.5 million,
and (iv) capitalized development costs in the Products
segment of
4.6 million. |
|
(c) |
Includes multi-clients surveys amortization of
69.6 million. |
F-57
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geophysical | |
|
Geophysical | |
|
Eliminations and | |
|
Consolidated | |
2004 |
|
services | |
|
products | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
|
388.0 |
|
|
|
299.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687.4 |
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
389.3 |
|
|
|
313.6 |
|
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
687.4 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities
|
|
|
389.7 |
|
|
|
313.6 |
|
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
687.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(19.8 |
) |
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
(a) |
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (loss) of investees
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Capital
expenditures(b)
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
107.3 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization(c)
|
|
|
121.8 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
132.3 |
|
Corporate assets amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in companies under equity method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
540.8 |
|
|
|
311.9 |
|
|
|
(44.9 |
) |
|
|
807.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated and corporate assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
971.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which equity method companies
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable liabilities
|
|
|
230.7 |
|
|
|
129.6 |
|
|
|
(38.4 |
) |
|
|
321.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated and corporate liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
568.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes general corporate expenses of
13.0 million. |
|
(b) |
Includes (i) investments in multi-clients surveys of
51.1 million,
(ii) equipment acquired under capital lease of
8.7 million,
(iii) capitalized development costs in the Services segment
of
1.9 million,
and (iv) capitalized development costs in the Products
segment of
2.7 million. |
|
(c) |
Includes multi-clients surveys amortization of
66.5 million. |
Analysis by geographic zone
Analysis of operating
revenues by location of customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
France
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
2% |
|
Rest of Europe
|
|
|
182.5 |
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
|
124.1 |
|
|
|
18% |
|
Asia-Pacific/Middle East
|
|
|
297.3 |
|
|
|
34% |
|
|
|
274.5 |
|
|
|
40% |
|
Africa
|
|
|
90.6 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
Americas
|
|
|
291.7 |
|
|
|
34% |
|
|
|
207.7 |
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
687.4 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Analysis of operating
revenues by origin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
France
|
|
|
227.4 |
|
|
|
26% |
|
|
|
244.5 |
|
|
|
36% |
|
Rest of Europe
|
|
|
133.2 |
|
|
|
15% |
|
|
|
64.8 |
|
|
|
9% |
|
Asia-Pacific/Middle East
|
|
|
185.1 |
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
|
19% |
|
Africa
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
6% |
|
|
|
50.7 |
|
|
|
7% |
|
Americas
|
|
|
274.0 |
|
|
|
32% |
|
|
|
195.7 |
|
|
|
29% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
687.4 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outside France, the U.S. is the only country which is deemed
material with 13% and 21% of consolidated revenues by origin in
2004 and 2005 respectively.
Due to the constant change in work locations, the Group does not
track its assets based on country of origin or ownership.
Analysis of operating revenues by category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Sales of goods
|
|
|
296.6 |
|
|
|
34 % |
|
|
|
281.3 |
|
|
|
41% |
|
Services rendered
|
|
|
468.6 |
|
|
|
54% |
|
|
|
339.9 |
|
|
|
49% |
|
Royalties (after-sales)
|
|
|
97.4 |
|
|
|
11% |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
9% |
|
Leases
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
687.4 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 19 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
Analysis of research and development expenses is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Research and development costs gross, incurred
|
|
|
(43.5 |
) |
|
|
(35.5 |
) |
Development costs capitalized
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Research and development expensed
|
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
|
|
(30.9 |
) |
Government grants recognized in income
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development costs net
|
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenditures related primarily to:
|
|
|
|
|
for the geophysical services segment, projects concerning data
processing services; and |
|
|
|
for the products segment, projects concerning seismic data
recording equipment. |
F-59
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTE 20 OTHER REVENUES AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Assets depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
Variation of reserves for restructuring
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Other non-recurring revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Other non-recurring expenses
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-recurring revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
Exchange gains (losses) on hedging contracts
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
Gains (losses) on sales of assets
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
The provision for restructuring booked in 2003 was reversed for
0.1 million
in 2005 once the restructuring expenses were incurred.
Exchange gains & losses on hedging contracts corresponded to
the impact of financial hedging instruments allocated to the
operating revenues of the period.
Gain on sale of assets related primarily to
1.2 million
loss on damaged seismic recording equipment of the vessel
Amadeus.
Year ended December 31, 2004
The provision for restructuring booked in 2003 was reversed for
11 million
in 2004 once the restructuring expenses were incurred.
Other non-recurring revenues were principally
related to insurance indemnities to be received for the loss of
the Companys seismic vessel, the CGG Mistral
recorded for an amount of
1.8 million.
Exchange gains & losses on hedging contracts correspond to
the impact of financial hedging instruments allocated to the
operating revenues of the period.
Gain on sale of assets included primarily a gain of
7.9 million
on the disposal of PGS shares and a gain of
2.2 million
on the disposal of a building.
NOTE 21 COST OF FINANCIAL DEBT
Cost of financial debt includes expenses related to financial
debt, composed of bonds, debt component of convertible bonds,
bank loans, capital-lease obligations and other financial
borrowings, net of income provided by cash and cash equivalents.
F-60
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Analysis of cost of financial debt is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Current interest expenses related to financial debt
|
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.7 |
) |
Financial cost on early redemption of bonds
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
Interest expenses and financial expenses related to the Bridge
loan put in place for the acquisition of Exploration Resources
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of financial debt, net
|
|
|
(42.3 |
) |
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described in note 12, we redeemed and paid accrued
interest on all of the remaining outstanding
U.S.$150 million aggregate principal amount of our
105/8%
senior notes due 2007 on May 31, 2005. The premium and the
unamortized portion of the deferred expenditures linked to this
redemption as well as the overlapped interests on the month of
May 2005 amounted to
9.4 million
and were recognized as Cost of financial debt.
This repayment of $150 million follows a first repayment of
$75 million decided by the Board of Directors held on
December 8, 2004. According to the indenture, such early
redemption implied the payment of a premium representing 5.3125%
of the total redemption amount, i.e. US $4.0 million. The
redemption of the Notes actually took place on January 26,
2005. The premium and the unamortized portion of the deferred
expenditures linked to this redemption, amounting to
4.3 million,
were recognized in the profit and loss as Cost of
financial debt at December 31, 2004.
NOTE 22 OTHER FINANCIAL INCOME (LOSS)
Analysis of other financial income (loss) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Exchange gains and losses, net
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
Other financial income
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Premium paid for the nearly conversion of the convertible bonds
|
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Write-off of issuance costs on convertible bonds recognized as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense at the time of the early conversion
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other financial expenses
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial income (loss)
|
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, Other financial expenses
included mainly the variance of the fair value of financial
hedging instruments that did not qualify as investment hedge for
an expense of
2.0 million.
F-61
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTE 23 INCOME TAXES
Income tax
Income tax expense consists in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
France
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
current income taxes
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
deferred taxes and
other(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign countries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
current income
taxes(a)
|
|
|
(30.9 |
) |
|
|
(21.9 |
) |
deferred taxes and
other(b)
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
includes withholding taxes |
|
(b) |
includes principally deferred income and expense taxes |
The Company and its subsidiaries compute income taxes in
accordance with the applicable tax rules and regulations of the
numerous taxi authorities where the Group operates. The tax
regimes and income tax rates legislated by these taxing
authorities vary substantially. In foreign countries, income
taxes are often accrued based on deemed profits calculated as a
percentage of sales as defined by local government tax
authorities.
In accordance with the provisions of French tax law, the Company
elected on January 1, 1991 to file a consolidated tax
return for French subsidiaries in which the Company holds an
interest of more than 95% from the beginning of the relevant
year. The Company does not obtain any French tax credits in
respect of income taxes paid abroad.
The main difference between the effective tax rate and the legal
tax rate enacted in France at December 31, 2005 is the loss
of the French tax group in 2005, for which no deferred tax
income and asset were recorded in the
F-62
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
year. The reconciliation between income tax expense in the
income statement and the theoretical tax charge is detailed
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
Income before tax
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Differences on taxable basis:
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates
|
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
Net loss of the French tax
group(a)
|
|
|
74.8 |
|
Theoretical taxable base excluding French tax group
|
|
|
80.6 |
|
Income tax rate enacted in France
|
|
|
34.93% |
|
Theoretical tax
|
|
|
(28.2 |
) |
Differences on income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax on Argass income paid by
CGG(b)
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Deferred tax income on carry-forward losses at CMG
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Differences on income tax rate
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Income tax
|
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(a) |
the theoretical deferred tax income related to the loss of the
French tax group in 2005, estimated to
26,1 million,
was not booked in the Group income statement in 2005. |
|
(b) |
CGG, as shareholder of Argas, is directly required to pay income
tax for Argas in Saudi Arabia for its share in Argas. |
Due to the mobile nature of seismic acquisition activities,
current relationships between the French and foreign components
of such tax items are not reliable indicators of such
relationships in future periods.
Net operating loss carried forward
In both France and foreign jurisdictions where income tax is not
determined based on deemed profits calculated as a percentage of
sales, the main significant temporary differences between
financial and tax reporting relate to net operating loss carried
forward.
Net operating loss carried forward available in France and
foreign jurisdictions, and not recognized as deferred tax assets
at December 31, 2005, amounted to
317.3 million,
including
98 million
of capital losses available in France at December 31, 2005
and are currently scheduled to expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
|
France | |
|
countries | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
2006
|
|
|
98.0 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
Available indefinitely
|
|
|
107.1 |
|
|
|
70.9 |
|
Total
|
|
|
205.1 |
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
F-63
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Net operating loss carried forward in France include both losses
available for carried forward to reduce future French income tax
payable by the consolidated tax Group as well as losses dating
prior to January 1, 1991, which are only available to
reduce future income tax of the individual subsidiaries of the
Group.
Consequently, the Group has recorded valuation allowances to
fully provide for the potential tax benefit of carried forward
losses by entities that have a recent history of generating
losses
Tax losses carried forward and not recorded as a deferred tax
asset mainly relate to French tax losses for Euros of
107.1 million
at current rate (after consequences of Tax audit see
below) and of
98.0 million
for capital losses and United Kingdom tax losses incurred of GBP
24.5 million. After taking into account the financial
forecasts, the Group decided not to record any deferred tax
assets in respect of these tax losses available in future years.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities
Net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Deferred tax assets temporary differences
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Deferred tax assets tax losses carried
forward(a)
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
Total Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax. net
|
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
relating to loss carry forwards in United Kingdom, Mexico,
Norway and United States. |
The expectation of CMGs positive tax results, confirmed in
2005 by a taxable result, led at December 31, 2005 to the
recognition of a deferred tax income of
2.4 million
representing CMGs net operating loss carried forward
(MXN98.0 million) net of temporary differences
(MXN16.9 million) at December 31, 2005, at the enacted
Mexican tax rates of 28% to 29% depending on the fiscal year of
application.
Sercel Inc.s positive tax planning, confirmed in 2004 by a
taxable result had led in 2004 to the recognition of a deferred
tax income of
10.4 million
representing Sercel Inc.s net operating loss carried
forward (U.S.$24.7 million) and temporary differences
(U.S.$10.1 million), at the enacted U.S. tax rate of 35%.
As of December 31, 2005, the deferred tax situation in
France resulting from temporary differences between consolidated
and taxable results resulted in a net deferred taxable basis of
76 million,
whereby no deferred tax asset was recorded.
Tax position and tax audit
In 2002 the Company received a verification notice from the
French taxation authorities requesting documentation with
respect to corporate tax and value added tax. The corporate tax
audit covers the 1991 through 2001 fiscal year as required by
French law for use of net operating loss carry forwards. As a
consequence of this tax audit (symmetrical corrections and
application of new rules), we have reviewed the calculation of
income tax for the fiscal years subsequent to the fiscal period
reviewed.
Moreover, in 2003, Sercel S.A. and Sercel Holding S.A. were
subject to a tax audit from the French taxation authorities with
respect to corporate taxes and value added taxes. The audit
covers the 2001 and 2002 fiscal years.
F-64
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
The consequences of those controls, partially contested at
December 31, 2005 are taken into account in the books of
the corresponding entities and partially offset within the
French tax group system.
We are currently discussing all those tax reassessments with tax
authorities. Whatever the conclusion of these discussions be,
the tax reassessment related to the audited fiscal years 1991 to
2001 would be offset against net operating loss carried forward.
We thus consider that no additional income tax is due for fiscal
years 1991 to 2001.
We estimate the final risk of tax reassessment for the 2002
fiscal year on the French consolidated tax group to be
0.5 million
income tax to be due. When the discussions with tax authorities
conclude, the Group will make a request for the additional
income tax in fiscal year 2002 to be offset against the net
operating tax loss carried forward in fiscal year 2003.
As a consequence, the risk linked to the tax reassessment will
only affect net operating loss carried forward. We thus provided
for only the additional contributions (not covered by the
carry-back of net
operating losses) and for the likely overdue interests at
December 31, 2005 for a
non-material amount.
On March 18, 2005, CGG Americas Inc. received a
correspondence from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service
regarding an upcoming standard tax audit scheduled for the
second quarter of 2005 covering CGG Americas 2003 tax
return. This tax audit is currently in progress and we do not
expect any material adjustment.
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries and the Groups
share of undistributed earnings of companies accounted for using
the equity method amounted to
811.6 million
at December 31, 2005 and to
201.9 million
at December 31, 2004. The Group has booked deferred tax
liabilities for taxes on part of these earnings, in particular
on undistributed reserves that did not support tax in the
Norwegian companies under the tax tonnage scheme.
NOTE 24 PERSONNEL
The analysis of personnel is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Personnel employed under French contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geophysical services
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
Products
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
Personnel employed under local contracts
|
|
|
2.477 |
|
|
|
2.250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3.952 |
|
|
|
3.669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including field staff of:
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
The total cost of personnel employed by consolidated
subsidiaries was
223.8 million
in 2005 and
203.1 million
in 2004.
F-65
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTE 25 DIRECTORS REMUNERATION
Directors remuneration was as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in euros) | |
Short-term employee benefit excluding tax on
salary(1)
|
|
|
3,026,474 |
|
|
|
2,939,051 |
|
Long-term employee benefit
pension(2)
|
|
|
26,331 |
|
|
|
19,576 |
|
Long-term employee benefit supplemental
pension(3)
|
|
|
2,050,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based
payments(4)
|
|
|
170,676 |
|
|
|
240,724 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes gross remunerations and attendance fees paid during the
year but excludes attendance fees paid to the President of the
Board of Directors, respectively
37,873 in 2005
and 39,886 in
2004. |
|
(2) |
Cost of services rendered |
|
(3) |
Corresponding to a supplemental pension implemented by the end
of 2004 and transferred to an insurance company; the amount
above mentioned is the contribution paid in 2005 to this company. |
|
(4) |
Expense in the income statement related to the stock-options
plan. No stock-options was attributed in 2005 to directors. |
NOTE 26 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Operating transactions
Louis Dreyfus Armateurs (LDA) provides ship
management services for a portion of our fleet. Charter parties
associated with these services are concluded on an arms
length basis. Debt to LDA was
6.0 million
as of December 31, 2005. Total net charges paid throughout
the year for the provision of ship management services were
0.8 million,
and the future commitments for such services to LDA were
23.3 million.
LDA and the Group own Geomar, a company accounted for under the
equity method. Geomar is the owner of the CGG Alizé
seismic vessel. LDA has a 51% controlling stake and we have
a 49% stake in Geomar. Amounts paid to Geomar by the Group
during the year were
8.8 million,
while future charter party amounts due to Geomar were
12.0 million.
Debt to Geomar was
0.9 million
at December 31, 2005.
The sales of geophysical products from Sercel to Argas, a 49%
owned affiliate, were
8.1 million,
representing 0.9% of the Group revenues in 2005. These
transactions were concluded on an arms length basis.
Sales of geophysical products from Sercel to Xian Peic, a 40%
owned affiliate, were
2.9 million,
representing 0.3% of Group revenues in 2005. These transactions
were concluded on an arms length basis.
Financing
No credit facility or loan was granted to the Company by
shareholders during the three periods presented.
F-66
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTE 27 SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for income taxes and interest was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Financial expenses paid
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
The Financial expenses paid include mainly
3.0 million
premium paid for the repayment of the
105/8%
bonds maturity 2007 in January 2005,
4.0 million
of issuing fees on the
71/2%
bonds maturity 2015 issued in april 2005,
14.2 million
of issuing fees and interest expenses related to the credit line
of $375 million used for acquisition of Exploration
Resources, repaid partially in December 2005 and
8.9 million
of premium paid to the bondholders having converted its bonds in
November 2005 (see note 12).
The Other non-cash items include mainly the
cancellation of the non-cash expense related to the variance on
derivative on convertible bonds (see note 12) and, in 2005,
to the reclassification of the cash-out of the
8.9 million
of premium paid to the bondholders having converted its bonds in
November 2005 from Cash from operations to
Financial expenses paid.
The Impact of changes in exchange rate on financial
items corresponds notably to the elimination of the
unrealized exchange gains (losses) resulting from the gross
financial debt in U.S. dollars located in those
subsidiaries whose functional currency is euro; this elimination
amounted to
15.8 million
in 2005 and
(12.9) million
in 2004 and was mostly netted off in 2004 by the elimination of
the unrealized loss on the cash in U.S. dollars.
Non-cash investing and financing transactions that are excluded
from the consolidated statements of cash flows consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Equipment acquired under capital leases
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
NOTE 28 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 2006, we offered an additional $165 million (the
Additional Notes) of our dollar-denominated
71/2%
Senior Notes due 2015 issued in April 2005 (the Existing
Notes) in a private placement to certain eligible
investors. The notes were issued at a price of
1031/4%
of their principal amount, resulting in a Yield-to-Worst of
6.9%. The notes were issued on February 3rd, 2006 and the
net proceeds from the Additional Notes are used mainly to repay
on February 10, 2006, $140.3 million remaining under
CGGs $375 million bridge credit facility used to
finance the acquisition of Exploration Resources.
F-67
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
NOTE 29 |
LIST OF PRINCIPAL CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES AND COMPANIES
ACCOUNTED FOR USING THE EQUITY METHOD AS OF DECEMBER 31,
2005 |
Certain dormant or insignificant subsidiaries of the Group have
not been included in the list below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of | |
Siren Number(a) |
|
Consolidated companies |
|
Head Office |
|
interest | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
403 256 944
|
|
CGG Marine SAS |
|
Massy, France |
|
|
100.0 |
|
351 834 288
|
|
Geocal SARL |
|
Massy, France |
|
|
100.0 |
|
966 228 363
|
|
Geoco SAS |
|
Paris, France |
|
|
100.0 |
|
378 040 497
|
|
Sercel SA |
|
Carquefou, France |
|
|
100.0 |
|
410 072 110
|
|
CGG Explo SARL |
|
Massy, France |
|
|
100.0 |
|
866 800 154
|
|
Sercel Holding SA |
|
Carquefou, France |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG Americas. Inc. |
|
Houston, United States |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG do Brasil Participaçoes Ltda |
|
Rio do Janeiro, Brazil |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG Canada Services Ltd. |
|
Calgary, Canada |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG International SA |
|
Geneva, Switzerland |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG (Nigeria) Ltd. |
|
Lagos, Nigeria |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG Marine Resources Norge A/S |
|
Hovik, Norway, |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG Offshore UK Ltd. |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG India Private Ltd. |
|
New Delhi, India |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
Exploration Resources ASA |
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Exploration Investment Resources AS |
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Exploration Investment Resources II AS |
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Exploration Vessel Resources AS |
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Exploration Vessel Resources II AS |
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Multiwave Geophysical Company ASA and its subsidiaries |
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Companía Mexicana de Geofisica |
|
Mexico City, Mexico, |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Companhia de Geologia e Geofisica Portuguesa |
|
Lisbon, Portugal |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Exgeo CA |
|
Caracas, Venezuela |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Geoexplo |
|
Almaty, Kazakhstan |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Geophysics Overseas Corporation Ltd. |
|
Nassau, Bahamas |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG Australia Services Pty Ltd. |
|
Sydney, Australia |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG Asia
Pacific(b) |
|
Kuala Lumpur, Malaisia |
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
Petroleum Exploration Computer Consultants Ltd. |
|
Forest Row, United Kingdom |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
CGG Vostok |
|
Moscow, Russia |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
PT CGG Indonesia |
|
Jakarta, Indonesia |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Sercel Australia |
|
Sydney, Australia |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Hebei Sercel
JunFeng(c) |
|
Hebei, China |
|
|
51.0 |
|
|
|
Sercel Inc. |
|
Tulsa, United States |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Sercel Singapore Pte Ltd. |
|
Singapore, Singapore |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Sercel England Ltd. |
|
Somercotes, United Kingdom |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Sercel Canada Ltd. |
|
Calgary, Canada |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
(a) |
Siren number is an individual identification number for company
registration purposes under French law. |
|
(b) |
the consolidation of CGG Asia Pacific, in which CGG owns 33.2%
of the ordinary shares and 30% of the total shares is compliant
with IFRS. |
|
(c) |
Sercel JunFeng is fully consolidated since, according to the
management agreement, the Group has operating control of the
company. |
F-68
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of | |
Siren number(a) |
|
Accounted for using the equity method |
|
Head Office |
|
interest | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
413 926 320
|
|
Geomar SAS |
|
Paris. France |
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
Argas Ltd. |
|
Al-Khobar. Saudi Arabia |
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
JV Xian Peic/ Sercel Limited |
|
Xian. China |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
VS Fusion |
|
Houston. United States |
|
|
49.0 |
|
NOTE 30 RECONCILIATION FROM FRENCH ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES TO IFRS
Reconciliation of shareholders equity at
January 1, 2004 and at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
expense | |
|
|
|
shareholders | |
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
Movements | |
|
Movements | |
|
recognized | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
equity and | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
Net | |
|
in stock- | |
|
in treasury | |
|
directly in | |
|
translation | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Minority | |
|
minority | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
income | |
|
options | |
|
shares | |
|
equity | |
|
adjustment | |
|
2004 | |
|
interest | |
|
interest | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in million of euros) | |
Total under French accounting principles
|
|
|
396.6 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
395.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
404.8 |
|
(a) Tangible assets (IAS 16)
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
(b) Employee benefits (IAS 19)
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
(c) Currency translation (IAS 21)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Treasury shares (IAS 32)
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
(e) Goodwill amortization (IAS 36)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
(f) Development costs (IAS 38)
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
(g) Financial instruments (IAS 39)
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
(h) Financial debt (IAS 39)
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
(h) Convertible bonds derivative (IAS 39)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
(i) Stock-options (IFRS 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j) Revenue recognition (IAS 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Impact of IFRS restatements before deferred tax and minority
interests
|
|
|
420.0 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
395.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
404.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of deferred tax
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total under IFRS
|
|
|
419.2 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
393.2 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
402.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information about IFRS restatements is disclosed in
paragraph 1. Main IFRS restatements.
F-69
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Reconciliation of balance sheet at January 1, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
French | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
Principles | |
|
Ref. | |
|
Reclassifications | |
|
Ref. | |
|
Restatements | |
|
IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
165.5 |
|
|
|
(k) |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170.1 |
|
Inventories and work-in-progress
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.4 |
|
Income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l) |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
(h)(l) |
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
383.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
385.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l) |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Investments and other financial assets
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
(k)(l)(m) |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
(m) |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
216.0 |
|
|
|
(n) |
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
215.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
|
|
|
205.1 |
|
|
|
(n) |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
217.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
495.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
523.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
|
879.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
909.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Current portion of financial debt
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
Trade accounts and notes payable
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.8 |
|
Accrued payroll costs
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
Advance billings to customers
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
Provisions current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o) |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
(o) |
|
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
234.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
229.3 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l) |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Provisions non-current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o) |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
12.7 |
|
Financial debt
|
|
|
207.8 |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
202.1 |
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
(l)(o) |
|
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
239.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
251.9 |
|
Common stock
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
292.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292.7 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
132.1 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
(51.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Income and expenses recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
(51.6 |
) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
396.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
419.2 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity and minority interests
|
|
|
405.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
428.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
879.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
909.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-70
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Information about IFRS restatements is disclosed in
paragraph 1. Main IFRS restatements. Information about
IFRS reclassifications is disclosed in
paragraph 2. Main IFRS reclassifications.
Reconciliation of net income for the year ended at
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
French | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principles | |
|
Ref. | |
|
Reclassifications | |
|
Ref. | |
|
Restatements | |
|
IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in million of euros) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
692.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
687.4 |
|
Other revenues of ordinary activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(q) |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues of ordinary activities
|
|
|
692.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
687.8 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(556.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)(f) |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(554.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
133.8 |
|
Research and development expenses, net
|
|
|
(33.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses, net
|
|
|
(79.5 |
) |
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(a)(i) |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(78.6 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses), net
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(d)(g) |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
Expenses related to financial debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Cost of net financial debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
(27.4 |
) |
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
Variance on derivative on convertible bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
Other financial incomes (expenses), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(p) |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(c)(g) |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Financial incomes (expenses), net
|
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
|
|
(q) |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange gains (losses), net
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(p) |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from consolidated companies
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e)(f)(j) |
|
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Goodwill amortization
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Information about IFRS restatements is disclosed in
paragraph 1. Main IFRS restatements.
Information about IFRS reclassifications is disclosed in
paragraph 2. Main IFRS reclassifications.
F-71
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Reconciliation of balance sheet at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
French | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
Principles | |
|
Ref. | |
|
Reclassifications | |
|
Ref. | |
|
Restatements | |
|
IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
130.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
130.6 |
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
191.7 |
|
|
|
(k) |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
(j) |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
196.8 |
|
Inventories and work-in-progress
|
|
|
81.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j) |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
Income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l) |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(j) |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
(l)(h) |
|
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
462.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
467.1 |
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l) |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
Investments and other financial assets
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
(k)(l)(m) |
|
|
|
(19.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
(m) |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
204.5 |
|
|
|
(n) |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
204.1 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
|
|
|
204.4 |
|
|
|
(n) |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(e)(f) |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
225.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
477.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
504.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
|
939.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
971.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Current portion of financial debt
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
Trade accounts and notes payable
|
|
|
97.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
Accrued payroll costs
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Advance billings to customers
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Provisions current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o) |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
(o) |
|
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
300.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296.0 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l) |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
Provisions non-current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o) |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
16.0 |
|
Financial debt
|
|
|
194.1 |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
176.5 |
|
Derivative on convertible bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
(l)(o) |
|
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
234.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
272.9 |
|
Common stock
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
173.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173.4 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
252.0 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
(52.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
214.5 |
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Net income attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Income and expenses recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
(64.2 |
) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
395.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
393.2 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity and minority interests
|
|
|
404.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
402.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
939.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
971.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-72
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Information about IFRS restatements is disclosed in
paragraph 1. Main IFRS restatements.
Information about IFRS reclassifications is disclosed in
paragraph 2. Main IFRS reclassifications.
1. Main IFRS restatements
(a) Tangible
assets (IAS 16)
Distinct components of a tangible asset are accounted for
separately when its estimated useful life are materially
different. We identified some components on certain
constructions and the corresponding amortization was restated
according to its specific useful life and its residual value in
Property, plan and equipment at
January 1, 2004, with a positive impact of
7.2 million
on shareholders equity, as well as the depreciation
expense for the year ended at December 31, 2004, with a
negative impact of
0.1 million
in the income statement.
(b) Employee
benefits (IAS 19)
Actuarial gains and losses on pension and other post-employment
benefit plans (IAS 19): cumulative unrecognized actuarial
gains and losses on pension and other post-employment benefit
plans at January 1, 2004 were recognized in
shareholders equity in the opening balance sheet, with a
positive impact of
0.7 million
on shareholders equity, and the corresponding amortization
of actuarial gains and losses for the year ending at
December 31, 2004 was cancelled, with a negative impact of
0.4 million
in the income statement.
(c) Currency
translation (IAS 21)
The accumulated total of translation adjustments at
January 1, 2004 were reversed against consolidated
reserves, with no impact on shareholders equity. As a
consequence, the loss related to the liquidation of Kantwell,
corresponding to the cumulative currency translation adjustment
of Kantwell at January 1, 2004 was cancelled in the income
statement of the twelve-months period ending at
December 31, 2004, with a positive impact of
4.0 as Other
financial incomes (expenses) in the income statement.
(d) Treasury
shares (IAS 32)
Treasury shares valued at their cost price were presented as a
reduction of shareholders equity, with a negative impact
of
0.8 million
at January 1, 2004. Gains from the sale of such securities
recognized in the income statement under French accounting
principles for the year ended at December 31, 2004 were
cancelled and recognized under shareholders equity, with a
negative impact of
1.4 million
in the income statement.
(e) Goodwill
amortization (IAS 36)
Upon transition to IFRS, goodwill will no longer be amortized
starting January 1, 2004. As a consequence the goodwill
amortization expense for the twelve-months period ending at
December 31, 2004 was reversed, with a positive impact of
5.0 million
net of deferred tax in the income statement.
(f) Development
costs (IAS 38)
As a consequence of the implementation of new rules of
IAS 38 (Intangible assets) for capitalization of
development costs with the retrospective method, development
costs previously recognized as expenses under French accounting
principles were capitalized as Intangible assets on
January 1, 2004 with a positive impact of
2.4 million
on shareholders equity. For the year ending at
December 31, 2004, development costs previously recognized
as Research and development expenses under French
accounting principles and complying requirements for
capitalization amounted to
4.7 million
and were capitalized. A depreciation expense for capitalized
development costs, amounting to
0.3 million
was recognized as Cost of operations over the year ended
at
F-73
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
December 31, 2004. The total impact of those adjustments,
net of deferred tax was a positive impact of
4.2 million
in the income statement for the year ended at December 31,
2004.
We implemented information systems to identify development costs
that should be capitalized. Nevertheless, it was not possible to
have a fully retrospective application of standard IAS 38, due
to a lack of measurable information.
(g) Financial
instruments (IAS 39)
IAS standards 32 39 on financial instruments have
been applied as from January 1, 2004.
As a consequence, PGS investment was reassessed at its fair
value at January 1, 2004 in Investments and other financial
assets, with a positive impact on shareholders equity of
4.3 million.
PGS was sold during the twelve months period ending
December 31, 2004 and the
4.3 million
restatement was reversed directly in equity.
Financial hedging instruments (forward exchange contracts) were
reassessed at its fair value at January 1, 2004 in Other
current assets, with a positive impact of
8.5 million
euros, including
4.9 million
unrealized gains recognized directly in equity for those
financial instruments that qualified for hedge accounting as
cash-flow hedge, and
3.6 million
unrealized gains recognized in retained earnings for those
financial instruments that did not qualify for hedge accounting.
The total impact on shareholders equity was
8.5 million
euros at January 1, 2004.
At December 31, 2004, financial hedging instruments
(forward exchange contracts) were reassessed at its fair value
for a total amount of
5.3 million
euros in Other current assets. Thus, the negative variance of
the fair value of financial hedging instruments for the twelve
months period ending at December 31, 2004 amounted to
3.8 million,
including a negative impact of
1.2 million
recognized directly in equity for those financial instruments
that qualified for hedge accounting as cash-flow hedge, and a
negative impact of
2.6 million
recognized as Other financial incomes (expenses) in the
income statement for those financial instruments that did not
qualify for hedge accounting.
Furthermore, the impact of forward exchange contracts that
qualified for hedge accounting and that related to revenues
recognized of the year ended at December 31, 2004 was
reclassified from Other financial incomes (expenses) to Other
revenues in Operating income, for a total amount of
4.4 million.
(h) Financial
debt (IAS 32 & IAS 39)
Implementing IFRS (IAS 38) led us to reclassify issuance costs
related to financial debt, previously presented as Other
current assets, as a decrease in financial debt of
5.4 million
at January 1, 2004 and of
7.3 million
at December 31, 2004. For the year ended December 31,
2004, the amortization of issuance costs, calculated according
to the straight-forward method, as well as the premium related
to the redemption of bonds were reclassified as Cost of
financial debt for a total amount of
5.8 million,
previously recognized as Sales, General and Administrative
expenses for
1.5 million
and as Other expenses for
4.3 million.
In addition, the amortization of issuance costs was reassessed
according to the effective interest rate method over the
lifetime of the debt with a negative impact on Cost of
financial debt of
0.4 million
in the income statement for the year ended at December 31,
2004.
The $85 million 7.75% convertible bonds due 2012 issued by
CGG on November 4, 2004 (described in our Annual Report on
Form 20F for the year ended December 31, 2004) were
previously wholly accounted for as financial debt under French
GAAP. Under IFRS, as the convertible bonds are denominated in
U.S. dollars and convertible into new ordinary shares
denominated in Euros, the embedded conversion option has been
bifurcated and accounted separately within long-term
liabilities. The conversion option and the debt component were
initially recognized at fair value on issuance. Subsequent
changes of the fair value of the embedded derivatives
F-74
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
have been booked to the consolidated income statement. As a
result of bifurcating the embedded conversion option, the debt
component of the convertible debt instrument was issued at a
discount of
10.5 million.
The fair value of the debt had not changed significantly as of
December 31, 2004 from the time it was issued in November
2004. The amount of the debt component to be recorded within the
financial statements has been discounted at the rate of 10.75%,
the rate borne by comparable indebtedness without a conversion
option. This debt discount is amortized to interest expense
until maturity of the convertible bonds.
The fair value of the embedded derivative has been determined
using a binomial model. The fair value increased from
10.4 million
at the initial recognition of the debt to
33.9 million
at December 31, 2004, principally as a result of an
increase in the CGG share price. This resulted in aggregate
expense of
23.5 million
on the year ended December 31, 2004, reflected in
Other financial expense. The main assumptions used
for the year-end valuation are an implicit volatility of 25%, a
cost of share borrowing of 3% and a credit-risk premium of 4.5%
at December 31, 2004.
(i) Stock-options
(IFRS 2)
Fair value of stock-options granted since November 7, 2002,
previously not recognized under French accounting principles,
was recognized under IFRS with a negative impact in the income
statement of
0.5 million
for the year ended at December 31, 2004.
(j) Revenue
recognition (IAS 11)
The principles in applying the stage of completion method, as
specified under IAS 11, have been carried out at
December 31, 2004, with a reduction in Operating revenues
of
5.3 million,
a reduction in Cost of Operations of
2.7 million
and a reduction in Income tax of
0.2 million
on the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
2. Main IFRS reclassifications
Balance sheet
(a) Long-term
portion of trade accounts receivables
Long-term portion of trade accounts receivables previously
presented as Long-term receivables under French
accounting principles was presented as Trade accounts
receivables under IFRS.
(b) Income
tax and deferred tax
Income tax assets previously presented under Other current
assets and income tax liabilities previously presented under
Other current liabilities under French accounting
principles were presented under IFRS as a separate caption in
the balance sheet. Deferred tax assets previously presented
under Other current assets or Long-term receivables
and deferred tax liabilities previously presented under
Other current liabilities or Other long-term
liabilities under French accounting principles were
presented under IFRS as a separate caption in the balance sheet.
(c) Advances
to companies accounted for under equity method
Advances to companies accounted for under equity method
previously presented as Investments in and advances to
companies under the equity method under French accounting
principles were presented as Investments and other financial
assets under IFRS.
F-75
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
(d) Computer
software
Computer software previously presented as Property, plant and
equipment under French accounting principles was presented
as Intangible assets under IFRS.
(e) Provisions
Provisions previously presented under Other current
liabilities or Other long-term liabilities under
French accounting principles were presented under IFRS as a
separate caption in the balance sheet.
Profit and loss
(a) Exchange
gains and losses
Exchange gains and losses previously presented as a separate
caption under French accounting principles were presented as
Other financial income (expenses) under IFRS.
(b) Other
revenues of ordinary activities
Discounting on present value of long-term receivables previously
presented as Other financial income (expenses)
under French accounting principles are presented as
Other revenues from ordinary activities under
IFRS.
3. Main IFRS impacts on cash-flow
statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
French | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gaaps | |
|
Reclassification(a) | |
|
Reclassification(b) | |
|
Reclassification(c) | |
|
Others | |
|
IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros) | |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
91.9 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
Net cash from investing activities
|
|
|
(100.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(100.8 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
|
130.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Financial expenses paid |
|
(b) |
Treasury shares |
|
(c) |
Foreign exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents in USD |
NOTE 31 RECONCILIATION TO U.S. GAAP
|
|
A |
SUMMARY OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES FOLLOWED
BY THE GROUP AND U.S. GAAP |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) as endorsed by the European Union, which
differ in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP.
These differences relate primarily to the following items, and
the necessary adjustments are shown in the tables in section B
below.
F-76
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Goodwill
Under IFRS, we no longer amortize goodwill beginning
January 1, 2004. Under US GAAP, we no longer amortize
goodwill beginning January 1, 2002.
Deferred taxes
Under IFRS, deferred tax assets or liabilities, related to
non-monetary assets or liabilities that are remeasured from the
local currency into the functional currency using historical
exchange rates and that result from changes in exchange rates,
are recognized.
Under U.S. GAAP, deferred tax liabilities or assets are not
recognized for differences related to assets and liabilities
that, under FASB Statement N°52 (Foreign Currency
Translation), are remeasured from the local currency into
the functional currency using historical exchange rates and that
result from changes in exchange rates.
Currency translation adjustment
Under IFRS, the accumulated total of translation adjustments at
January 1, 2004 has been reversed against consolidated
reserves. As a consequence, all gains and losses linked to the
currency translation adjustment on entities that are sold or
that exit our scope of consolidation scope are computed on the
basis of the restated currency translation adjustment.
Under U.S. GAAP, historical values are maintained for
currency translation adjustment and thus for calculation of
gains and losses linked to the currency translation adjustment
on entities that are sold or that exit our scope of
consolidation.
Stock-based compensation
Under IFRS, stock options granted to employees are included in
the financial statements using the following principles: the
stock options fair value is determined on the granting
date and is recognized in personnel costs on a straight-line
basis over the period between the grant date and the exercise
date corresponding to the vesting period. Stock
option fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes model,
only for stock-options plans granted since November 7, 2002.
Under US GAAP, CGG has decided to early adopt the
FAS123 (R) standard and to apply the modified
prospective method as of January 1st, 2005.
Compensation costs for requisite services rendered over the
period are recognised at their fair value through the income
statement. This method applies to all plans granted by the
group. At year end December 31, 2004, compensation costs on
stock options plans granted to employee were valued as the
excess if any, of the market price of the underlying shares at
the date of grant over the exercise price of the option. This
cost is recognised through income statement on all stock options
plans granted by the Group (intrinsic value method). The
restatement at fair value at year end December 31, 2004 of
stock options granted to employees is presented in the pro forma
disclosures.
Development costs
Under IFRS, expenditure on development activities, whereby
research findings are applied to a plan or design for the
production of new or substantially improved products and
processes, is capitalized if:
|
|
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately
identified and reliably measured, |
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, |
|
|
|
the Group has sufficient resources to complete development. |
F-77
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Under U.S. GAAP, all expenditures related to research and
development are recognized as an expense in the income statement.
Convertible bonds
For US GAAP purposes, as regards convertible bonds, there
is an embedded derivative that can not be reliably assessed,
corresponding to the early redemption clause (see note 12
to our consolidated annual financial statements). The
probability of occurrence of this clause being uncertain, the
related embedded derivative cannot be measured reliably and thus
is not recognized by the Group in its U.S. GAAP financial
statements.
Derivative instruments and hedging activity
Under IFRS, long-term contracts in foreign currencies (primarily
U.S. dollar) are not considered to include embedded
derivatives when such contracts are routinely denominated in
this currency (primarily U.S. dollars) in the industry.
Under U.S. GAAP, such an exemption does not exist and
embedded derivatives in
long-term contracts in
foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollar) are recorded in
the balance sheet at fair value. Revenues and expenses with a
non-U.S. dollar client or supplier are recognized at the
forward exchange rate negotiated at the beginning of the
contract. The variation of fair market value of the embedded
derivative foreign exchange contracts is recognized in the
income statement in the line item Other financial income
(loss).
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a
period except those resulting from investments by owners and
distributions to owners. In our consolidated financial
statements, the concept of comprehensive income corresponds to
the caption Gains and losses directly recognized in equity
in IFRS consolidated statements.
In U.S. GAAP financial statements, comprehensive income and
its components must be displayed in a statement of comprehensive
income.
For us, these statements include in addition to net income:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the cumulative translation adjustment related to
consolidated foreign subsidiaries, |
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designed as
cash flow hedges meeting the criteria established by
SFAS 133; and |
|
|
|
changes in the amount of the additional minimum pension
liability due to actuarial losses. |
F-78
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
B |
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY TO
U.S. GAAP |
Consolidated Net
Income(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(in millions |
|
|
of euros) |
Net loss) as reported in Consolidated Statements of
operations
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Deferred tax (FAS 109)
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt (APB 26)
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
2.8 |
|
Stock options
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Cancellation of IFRS long-term contracts adjustment
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
Cancellation of IFRS tangible assets adjustment
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Cancellation of IFRS currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS capitalization of development costs
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Available for sale security (FAS 115)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Derivative instruments (FAS 133)
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Restatements are presented net of tax.. |
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(in millions |
|
|
of euros) |
Shareholders equity as reported in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
|
|
393.2 |
|
Goodwill amortization (FAS 142)
|
|
|
13.4 |
(b) |
|
|
12.6 |
(b) |
Deferred tax (FAS 109)
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) (b) |
|
|
(9.6 |
)(b) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt (APB 26)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Stock options
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS long-term contracts adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Cancellation of IFRS tangible assets adjustment
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS capitalization of development costs
|
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
Derivative instruments (FAS 133)
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
689.5 |
|
|
|
372.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
All adjustments disclosed above are net of tax effects, if
applicable. |
|
(b) |
This amount is net of currency translation adjustment effect. |
F-79
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
CONDENSED US GAAP INCOME STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET
Condensed US GAAP income statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
860.8 |
|
|
|
709.5 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
(665.4 |
) |
|
|
(559.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
195.4 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses net
|
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
(33.5 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(92.7 |
) |
|
|
(79.7 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of financial debt, net
|
|
|
(46.6 |
) |
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
Variance on derivative on convertible bonds
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
Other financial income (loss)
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
Equity in income (losses) of affiliates
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) of consolidated companies before income
taxes and minority interests
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
Minority interests
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
12,095,925 |
|
|
|
11,681,406 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from
stock-options(1)
|
|
|
261,855 |
|
|
|
83,211 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from convertible
bonds(2)
|
|
|
252,500 |
|
|
|
233,333 |
|
Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed option exercises
when dilutive
|
|
|
12,357,779 |
|
|
|
11,681,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic for shareholder
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
Diluted for shareholder
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
anti-dilutive for year ended at December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
anti-dilutive for years ended at December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2005. |
F-80
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Condensed US GAAP balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in | |
|
|
millions of euros) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
608.5 |
|
|
|
480.2 |
|
Long-term assets
|
|
|
965.4 |
|
|
|
495.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
1,573.8 |
|
|
|
975.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
509.9 |
|
|
|
325.8 |
|
Long term liabilities
|
|
|
362.7 |
|
|
|
268.6 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
689.5 |
|
|
|
372.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
1,573.8 |
|
|
|
975.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Comprehensive income
(loss)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in million | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Net income (loss) under US GAAP
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
(43.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
All adjustments disclosed above are net of tax effects, if
applicable. |
Statement of Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in million | |
|
|
of euros) | |
Cumulative Translation adjustment
|
|
|
(41.9 |
) |
|
|
(65.2 |
) |
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive loss under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
(43.3 |
) |
|
|
(62.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
All adjustments disclosed above are net of tax effects, if
applicable. |
C ADDITIONAL U.S. GAAP DISCLOSURES
Stock option plans
No stock-options were granted in 2004 and 2005.
F-81
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value
of the options is amortized to expense on a straight-line basis
over the options vesting period. The Companys pro
forma information is detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of |
|
|
euros except for |
|
|
income (loss) per |
|
|
share information) |
Net loss, as reported
|
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
Add: total stock-based employee compensation expense included in
reported net income, net of related tax effect
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of
related tax effects
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma U.S. GAAP net loss
|
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic for common stock holder as reported
|
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
Basic for common stock holder pro forma
|
|
|
(2.03 |
) |
|
Diluted for common stock holder as reported
|
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
Diluted for common stock holder pro forma
|
|
|
(2.03 |
) |
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options which have no
vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because
the Companys employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate, the existing model,
in managements opinion, does not necessarily provide a
single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
Derivative financial instruments
Fair Value Hedge and Cash
Flow Hedge
The ineffectiveness of cash-flow hedges for the year 2005 and
2004 amounted to
23.7 million
and
(13) million
respectively, and is reported in the Exchange gains
(losses), net line item of the condensed statements of
operations.
Gains/(losses) accumulated in Comprehensive income were
(1.4) million
and
2.7 million
as of December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Hedge of the net investment
in a foreign operation
A portion of the amount of our outstanding bond denominated in
U.S. dollar and of our bridge loan credit facility has been
designated as a hedge of the investment in U.S. dollar. The
net amount of gains/(losses) that has been included in the
cumulative translation adjustment was
(22.0) million
and
4.9 million
during the year 2005 and 2004 respectively.
F-82
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
Restructuring plan
The evolution of the restructuring reserve under U.S. GAAP
during the year ended December 31, 2005, related to the
Land SBU restructuring plan initiated after December 31,
2003 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
beginning of | |
|
|
|
Deductions | |
|
Deductions | |
|
|
|
end of | |
|
|
year | |
|
Additions | |
|
(used) | |
|
(unused) | |
|
Other(a) | |
|
year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Termination benefits
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Other associated costs
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes the effects of exchange rate changes |
The evolution of the restructuring reserve under U.S. GAAP
during the year ended December 31, 2004, related to the
Land SBU restructuring plan initiated after December 31,
2003 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
beginning of | |
|
|
|
Deductions | |
|
Deductions | |
|
|
|
end of | |
|
|
year | |
|
Additions | |
|
(used) | |
|
(unused) | |
|
Other(a) | |
|
year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of euros) | |
Termination benefits
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Contract termination costs
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Other associated costs
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes the effects of exchange rate changes |
The major type of costs associated with the exit or disposal
activities of our Services segment initiated in 2003 are
presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
amount |
|
Amount incurred |
|
amount incurred |
|
|
expected |
|
as of Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
as of Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
Termination benefits
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Contract termination costs
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Other associated costs
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently issued U.S. accounting pronouncements
FASB Interpretation
No. 47 Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations
(FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that an entity
must record a liability for a conditional asset
retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation can be
reasonably estimated. The adoption of FIN 47 did not have a
material effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
F-83
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 clarifies that
abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized
as current-period charges and requires the allocation of fixed
production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity
of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
The Group does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 151
to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position
or results of operations.
Events occurred subsequently
to the closing of IFRS financial statements
On March 13, 2006, CGG Marine Resources Norge AS concluded
a medium term financing agreement for U.S.$26.5 million
with a bank. The purpose of this agreement is to finance the
acquisition of newly-developed Sentinel streamers
for the Offshore business. This financing is guaranteed by a
pledge on the equipment.
On March 27, 2006, the Group signed a Memorandum of
Understanding with Industrialization & Energy Services
Company (TAQA), its long term Saudi Partner in ARGAS. By this
Agreement TAQA will acquire 49% of the capital of CGG Ardiseis,
a newly formed CGG subsidiary dedicated to Land & Shallow
Water Seismic Data Acquisition in the Middle East. CGG will hold
the remaining 51%. CGG Ardiseis, whose headquarters are located
in Dubai, will provide its clients with the whole range of CGG
Land and Shallow Water Acquisition Services, focusing on
Eye-D, the latest CGG
technology for full 3D seismic imaging. As part of the
Agreement, CGG Ardiseis activities in the Gulf Cooperation
Council (GCC) countries will be exclusively operated by
ARGAS (Arabian Geophysical and Surveying Company), which is 51%
owned by TAQA and 49% by CGG.
On March 29, 2006, Exploration Resources concluded a credit
facility of U.S.$70 million. The proceeds from this credit
facility will finance seismic equipment for the vessels
C-Orion and Geo-Challenger
and the conversion of the Geo-Challenger
from a cable laying vessel to a 3D seismic vessel.
On March 31, 2006, the Norwegian government decided not to
award production licenses on blocks where the survey Moere is
located. As this decision is changing previous estimate of
future sales, this
4.6 million
survey will be fully depreciated at March 31, 2006.
F-84
COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (continued)
D CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION FOR CERTAIN
SUBSIDIARIES
The following table presents condensed consolidating financial
information in IFRS for the Company, on the one hand, and CGG
Canada Services Ltd, CGG Americas, Inc., CGG Marine Resources
Norge A/ S, Sercel Inc., Sercel Australia Pty Ltd and Sercel
Canada Ltd, taken as a group (the Subsidiary Group),
on the other hand, as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004. The column Sercel
Subsidiary Group includes Sercel Inc., Sercel Australia
Pty Ltd and Sercel Canada Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sercel | |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary | |
|
|
|
Consolidating | |
|
|
|
Subsidiary | |
IFRS |
|
CGG | |
|
Group | |
|
Others | |
|
adjustments | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
799.8 |
|
|
|
600.3 |
|
|
|
1,082.5 |
|
|
|
(917.5 |
) |
|
|
1,565.1 |
|
|
|
205.9 |
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
221.3 |
|
|
|
307.5 |
|
|
|
668.9 |
|
|
|
(327.8 |
) |
|
|
869.9 |
|
|
|
146.5 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
108.3 |
|
|
|
(122.6 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
623.6 |
|
|
|
341.7 |
|
|
|
718.3 |
|
|
|
(712.4 |
) |
|
|
971.2 |
|
|
|
150.8 |
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
190.7 |
|
|
|
227.8 |
|
|
|
589.6 |
|
|
|
(320.7 |
) |
|
|
687.4 |
|
|
|
104.8 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(38.2 |
) |
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
78.7 |
|
|
|
(77.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
14.2 |
|
F-85
EXPLORATION RESOURCES ASA
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2004
F-86
Audited Annual Combined U.S. GAAP Financial Statements
of Exploration Resources
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Exploration Resources
ASA
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheet of
Exploration Resources companies listed in Note 1
(predecessor to Exploration Resources ASA, the
Company) as of December 31, 2004, and the
related combined statements of income, changes in owners
investment, and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2004. These combined financial statements are the responsibility
of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the companies internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined
financial position of Exploration Resources companies listed in
Note 1 at December 31, 2004, and the combined results
of their operations and their combined cash flows for the year
ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Bergen, Norway
January 26, 2006
ERNST & YOUNG AS
Karl Erik Svanevik
Statsautorisert revisor
F-87
EXPLORATION RESOURCES ASA
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
Notes | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(in millions of NOK) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
84.5 |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198.9 |
|
Investment in associated companies
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
200.6 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS NET INVESTMENT |
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
Trade accounts and notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.0 |
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204.9 |
|
Long-term debt less current portion
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.9 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Owners net investment
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
76.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and owners net investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
F-88
EXPLORATION RESOURCES ASA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended | |
|
|
Notes | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(amounts in millions | |
|
|
|
|
of NOK) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
497.3 |
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(504.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
Other revenues net
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other financial income &
expense net
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Exchange gain (loss) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
F-89
EXPLORATION RESOURCES ASA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of NOK) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile Net income to Net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
75.2 |
|
Net gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
Equity in income of investees, net of dividends
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Non-cash items
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Increase/decrease in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in trade accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
Increase in inventories
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
Decrease in other current assets
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Increase in trade accounts and notes payable
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
Decrease in other current liabilities
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(96.3 |
) |
Investments in multi-client surveys
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Investments in equity-method companies
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
Cash paid for acquired businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(48.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(21.0 |
) |
Issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
Increase in bank overdrafts
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cashflow information is provided in Note 22 to
the combined financial statements.
F-90
EXPLORATION RESOURCES ASA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF OWNERS NET INVESTMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
Total | |
|
|
initial | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Owners | |
|
|
investment | |
|
income | |
|
earnings | |
|
income | |
|
Investment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions NOK) | |
As of December 31, 2003
|
|
|
135.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
135.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66.8 |
) |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
76.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-91
EXPLORATION RESOURCES ASA
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Description of Exploration Resources
Exploration Resources is a focused marine seismic company. The
Group owns four seismic vessels: Polar Princess, Polar Search,
Polar Duke, and Polar Venturer. Exploration Resources also holds
interests in a multi client library as well as 52.7 per
cent shareholding in Multiwave, a seismic company with special
competence and experience in technology for seabed seismic
operations.
Exploration Resources was incorporated on 17 August 2004
under the name Polar Seismikk ASA, for the purpose of
participating in the Demerger of Rieber Shipping.
Prior to the Demerger, Exploration Resources was part of the
Rieber Shipping group. Since the completion of the Demerger,
Exploration Resources was developed as a separate seismic
entity. Key milestones in recent history of Exploration
Resources within Rieber Shipping Group are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
In 2000, Rieber Shipping became a 49.5 per cent shareholder
in Multiwave, a seismic company focusing on seabed seismic
operations with high-tech project-based assignments. |
|
|
|
In 2001, Rieber Shipping started to invest in towed streamer
equipment on its seismic vessels. Polar Duke and Polar
Princess were upgraded with state of the art equipment. |
|
|
|
In 2002, the seismic vessel Polar Search was upgraded
with a new generation of seismic streamer technology and fully
rigged with all new seismic equipment. The vessel commenced a
charter to TGS Nopec in the US Gulf of Mexico, and its seismic
operation was handled by Multiwave. |
|
|
|
In 2003, Rieber Shipping entered into time charter party
agreements with Fugro Geoteam for two of its seismic vessels
Polar Princess and Polar Duke. Under the terms of
the agreements were that Fugro Geoteam would be responsible for
the exclusive marketing of the vessels and that profits earned
or losses incurred on their utilization, would be split between
the two parties. Towards the end of the year, Rieber Shipping
acquired the seismic vessel Polar Venturer, which was chartered
to Fugro under a similar arrangement. |
|
|
|
In 2004 the charter party agreement with Fugro were transferred
from Rieber to the Exploration Resources Group and extended for
a period of 3 years starting from 1 January 2005,
being a fixed contract for 2005, subject to that the aggregate
result for the vessels is showing a profit. For the years 2006
and 2007 both parties can terminate the agreements providing
100 days written notice. |
|
|
|
In 2004, the Group increased its holding in Multiwave to
52.7 per cent. Furthermore, in December the Boards of
Rieber Shipping and the Group signed the Demerger Plan for the
proposed Demerger of Rieber Shipping, after having considered
Rieber Shippings changing business portfolio, where marine
seismic gradually had become a larger and more important part.
Moreover, the Boards considered the fact that the risk profile
of the marine seismic business was different from the remaining
business portfolio, due to shorter contract duration and more
volatile earnings. It was thus expected that the seismic
business would be better positioned relative to future
development opportunities as a separate entity, rather than as
part of a joint shipping and offshore company. It was also
expected that the seismic business could be developed as an
attractive investment object on Oslo Børs. On
January 6, 2005 shareholders of the two companies
approved the Demerger Plan for the Demerger. Polar Seismikk ASA
was incorporated 17 August 2004 for the purpose of
participating in the Demerger. On February 3, 2005 its name
was changed to Exploration Resources ASA. |
F-92
As a result of the demerger, Exploration Resources current
legal structure is as follows:
Exploration Vessel Resources AS was previously named Polar Duke
AS, Exploration Vessel Resources II AS was previously named
Polar Search AS, and Exploration Investment Resources II AS
was previously named Polar Explorer II AS. Exploration
Investment Resources AS was founded 1 January, 2005.
Combined financial statements
Exploration Resources was a part of Rieber Shipping ASA until
Exploration Resourcess initial public offering on the Oslo
Stock Exchange in February 2005, and Rieber Shipping did not
prepare separate financial statements for Exploration
Resourcess business prior to that time. As a result, the
combined financial statements of Exploration Resources as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been carved out
from the consolidated financial statements of Rieber Shipping.
Although Exploration Resources did not operate as a stand-alone
business prior to January 2005, the combined financial
statements of Exploration Resources for the year ended
December 31, 2004 are intended to represent the historical
revenues and expenses of the business of Exploration Resources.
The combined income statement of Exploration Resources reflects
the business of operating units comprising the business
transferred from Rieber Shipping ASA to Exploration Resources in
January 2005 and the income statement of Multiwave accounted for
under the equity method from January 1, 2004 to
August 17, 2004 and consolidated from August 18, 2004
to December 31, 2004.
Furthermore, as described above in the note on the description
of Exploration Resources, the time charter agreements between
Fugro Geostream and Rieber were amended in early January 2005
and transferred to Exploration Resources Group Companies. As
Exploration Resources vessels were used to fulfill these
agreements, the revenues and expenses related to Riebers
interest in the agreements have been reflected in the combined
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
The accompanying combined financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accounting principles in
United States (US GAAP).
The combined financial statements have been carved out of the
consolidated financial statements of Rieber Shipping, and
include all costs and expenses relating to the Rieber Shipping
Seismic Division incurred or assumed. Although Exploration
Resources did not operate as a stand-alone business prior to
January 2005, the combined financial statements of Exploration
Resources for the year ended December 31, 2004 are intended
to represent the historical revenues and expenses of the
business of Exploration Resources.
The combined income statement of Exploration Resources reflects
the business of operating units comprising the business
transferred from Rieber Shipping ASA to Exploration Resources in
January 2005, the effective date such operating units were
legally transferred to Exploration Resources ASA. Multiwave was
F-93
accounted for under the equity method from January 1, 2004
to August 17, 2004 and consolidated from August 18,
2004 to December 31, 2004.
List of entities included in the combined financial
statements as of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of | |
Entities |
|
Head Office |
|
interest | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Exploration Resources ASA
|
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
100.0 |
|
Exploration Vessel Resources AS
|
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
100.0 |
|
Exploration Vessel Resources II AS
|
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
100.0 |
|
Exploration Investment Resources II AS
|
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
100.0 |
|
Multiwave Geophysical Company AS
|
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
52.8 |
|
Multiwave Geophysical Company ApS
|
|
Denmark |
|
|
52.8 |
|
Multiwave Exploration Ltd.
|
|
London, UK |
|
|
51.7 |
|
Multiwave Geophysical Company Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd
|
|
Singapore |
|
|
52.8 |
|
Presented below are the assumptions used in performing the
carve-out of the seismic operation of Rieber Shipping and
preparing the predecessor financial statements for the period
presented.
Balance sheet
Assets and liabilities have been attributed to each business
based on a detailed analysis and consistent with the legal
documentation of the seismic business spin off at
January 1, 2004.
Statement of income
The combined statements of operations include the revenues and
costs specifically attributable to the seismic operations of
Rieber Shipping.
All of Rieber Shippings revenues and costs are
specifically identifiable and attributable to its seismic
division.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may
differ materially from those estimates, due to changes in
general economic conditions, changes in laws and regulations,
changes in future operating plans and the inherent imprecision
associated with estimates.
Basis of consolidation
The combined financial statements include the accounts of the
Group and all majority-owned subsidiaries.
Investments in which the Groups ownership interest ranges
from 20% to 50% and the Group exercises significant influence
over operating and financial policies are accounted for using
the equity method.
All inter-company transactions and accounts are eliminated in
consolidation.
Foreign currency translation
The accounts of all the Groups subsidiaries are maintained
in the local currency and some of the accounts of the
Groups subsidiaries are remeasured in the functional
currency, i.e. the currency in which these subsidiaries
primarily conduct their business. With the exception of certain
subsidiaries, the functional currency of the Groups
subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. The companies reporting
currency is the Norwegian Kroner (NOK).
Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional
currency of a given entity are recorded at the exchange rate
prevailing on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign
F-94
currencies other than the functional currency are re-evaluated
at year-end exchange rates and any resulting unrealized exchange
gains and losses are included in income.
When translating the foreign currency financial statements of
foreign subsidiaries to the reporting currency NOK, year-end
exchange rates are applied to asset and liability accounts,
while average annual exchange rates are applied to income
statement accounts. Adjustments resulting from this process are
recorded in a separate component of shareholders equity.
With respect to foreign affiliates accounted for using the
equity method, the effects of exchange rate changes on the net
assets of the affiliate are recorded as a separate component of
shareholders equity.
Revenues
The Group recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of a sale
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured. The Group defers the
unearned component of payments received from customers for which
the revenue recognition requirements have not been met. The
Groups revenue recognition policy is described in more
details below.
Multi-client surveys consist of seismic surveys to be licensed
to customers on a non-exclusive basis.
Revenues related to multi-client surveys result from licenses
granted to customers after completion of the surveys.
Generally the Group grants a license entitling non-exclusive
access to a complete and ready for use, specifically defined
portion of the Groups multi-client data library in
exchange for a fixed and determinable payment. The Group
recognizes after sales revenue upon the client executing a valid
license agreement and having been granted access to the data.
In exclusive surveys, the Group performs seismic services for a
specific customer. The Group recognizes proprietary/contract
revenue as the services are rendered. The Group performs seismic
survey for a specific customer, in which case the seismic data
is the exclusive property of that customer. The Group recognizes
propriety on the revenues as the services are performed and
become chargeable to the customer on a proportionate performance
basis over the term of the contract. Progress is measured in a
manner generally consistent with the physical progress of the
project and revenue is based on the ratio of the project
progress to date to the total project revenues, provided that
all other revenue recognition criteria is satisfied. The Group
believes this ratio to be generally consistent with the physical
progress of the project.
Revenues related to profit split agreement are recognized when
they are fixed and determinable.
Cash and cash equivalents
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximate
fair value. Cash and cash equivalents that are restricted from
the Groups use are classified as restricted cash as part
of current or long term assets depending on the value of the
restrictions. Such restrictions primarily relate to employee tax
withholdings.
Intangible and tangible assets
Certain costs with reliably measurable and probable future
economic benefits are capitalized.
Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill should be tested for
impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently, if events or
changes in circumstances indicated that goodwill might be
impaired. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting
unit level. Accordingly, goodwill, together with all assets and
liabilities which are to be considered for purpose of
determining the fair value of the reporting unit, should be
assigned to reporting units defined as either operating segments
or one level below an operating segment (components)
depending on
F-95
whether a component constitutes a business for which discrete
financial information is available and for which segment
management regularly reviews the operating results of that
component unless such component has similar economic
characteristics with other components. Components with similar
economic characteristics should be aggregated into one reporting
unit.
The carrying value of each reporting unit is then compared to
its fair value in order to determine whether this reporting unit
has been impaired. For each reporting unit the fair value of
which exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill impairment if any is
measured by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to
its identifiable assets and liabilities, including the value of
any unrecognized intangible assets, in a manner similar to a
purchase accounting. This allocation results in an implied fair
value of goodwill. Any excess of the carrying amount of recorded
goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill is recorded as
a definitive write-off of the carrying value of goodwill.
Under SFAS No. 142, intangible assets with an
indefinite useful life are required to be tested for impairment
separately from goodwill. Indefinite life intangibles are
required at least annually or more frequently if events or
changes in circumstances indicated that the asset might be
impaired. Impairment tests are performed by comparing the fair
value of the intangible asset to its carrying amount. If the
carrying value exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset,
an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the
excess, as a definitive write-off of the carrying amount of the
intangible asset.
Under SFAS No. 144 Accounting for the impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, intangible assets with definite
useful lives and other long-lived assets (including property,
plant and equipment) that are held for use are tested for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that their carrying value might not be recoverable. For purposes
of recognition and measurement of impairment loss, a long-lived
asset should be grouped with other assets and liabilities at the
lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely
independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities.
Then the carrying value of the asset/group of assets is compared
to the sum of the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to
be generated from the use of the long-lived asset/group and its
eventual disposal. If the carrying value of the asset/group of
assets exceeds the future, net undiscounted cash flows expected
to be generated from the use of the long-lived asset/group and
its eventual disposal, the asset (group) is not recoverable
and an impairment loss is recognized equal to the excess of the
carrying value of the asset/group over its fair value as a
definitive write-off of the carrying value of the asset.
Fair value is measured based on quoted market prices in an
active market, or absent such quoted market prices, prices for
similar assets and the results of using other valuation
techniques such as the present value of estimates of future cash
flows to be generated by the asset (group) incorporating
assumptions that marketplace participants would use in their
estimates of such fair value.
Impairment losses are recognized in the income statement.
Impairment losses recognized in respect of cash-generating units
are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any
goodwill allocated to cash-generating units (group of units) and
then, to reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the
unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis.
Multi-client survey library
The multi-client survey library consists of seismic surveys to
be licensed to customers on a non-exclusive basis. All costs
directly incurred in acquiring, processing and otherwise
completing seismic surveys are capitalized into the multi-client
library. The value of our multi-client library is stated on our
balance sheet at the aggregate of those costs less accumulated
amortization or at fair value if lower. The Group reviews the
library for potential impairment of our independent surveys on
an ongoing basis.
The Group amortizes the multi-client surveys over the period
during which the data is expected to be marketed.
On every sale of data, an amortization is generally recorded in
proportion to revenue recognized to date as a percentage of the
total expected revenue. In determining the annual amortization
rates applied to the multi-client library, the Companys
management considers expected future sales and market
developments as well as past experience. These expectations
include consideration of geographic location, prospects,
political risk, exploration
F-96
license periods and general economic conditions. Management
estimates at least annually the total expected revenue for each
survey or group of surveys of the multi-client library. Because
of the inherent difficulty in estimating future sales and market
developments, it is possible that the amortization rates could
deviate significantly from year to year. The Group however has
adopted a policy of estimating future revenues based on its
knowledge of the business.
In any event, the Group applies a minimum amortization charge of
40% of the acquisition costs the year after acquisition, and 20%
annually thereafter, so that the data is fully amortized after
five years.
Tangible assets
Property, plant and equipment are valued at historical cost less
accumulated depreciation and impairment charges. Depreciation
and amortization are calculated based on cost less estimated
residual values using the straight-line method for all property
and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
3 to 5 years |
|
seismic vessels
|
|
|
25 years |
|
Dry-docking expenses are recognized as operating cost in the
income statement as incurred.
Capital leases
The Group has significant capital lease agreement. The Group
accounts for capital lease arrangements as if it had acquired
the assets by recognizing the asset against a capital lease
obligation for an amount equal to the present value of the
future lease payments or the assets fair market value if
lower.
The assets are depreciated over their expected useful lives or
over the related lease term if shorter.
When the lease is for 75% or more of the assets estimated
economic life or the present value of lease payments is greater
than or equal to 90% of the fair value of the asset at the
inception of the lease.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (including indirect
production costs where applicable) or net realizable value. The
cost of inventories is calculated using the
first-in first-out
method (FIFO).
Pension and other post-employment benefits
|
|
|
|
|
Defined contribution plans |
Contributions to defined contribution pension plans are
recognized as an expense as incurred.
The Groups net obligation in respect of defined benefit
pension plans is calculated separately for each plan by
estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have
earned in return for their service in the current and prior
periods; the benefit is discounted to determine its present
value, and the fair value of any plan assets is deducted. The
calculation is performed by using the projected unit credit
method.
When the benefits of a plan are increased, the portion of the
increased benefit relating to past service by employees is
recognized as an expense in the income statement on a
straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits
become vested. To the extent that the benefits vest immediately,
the expense is recognized immediately in the income statement.
Shipping company taxation system
Some of Exploration Resources subsidiaries are under the
Norwegian tonnage tax system. For companies under this regime,
taxes are assessed only when the ship owning company pays
dividend to its shareholders or no
F-97
longer complies with the conditions for the regime. Untaxed
income related to net tax increasing temporary differences when
entering the regime, remains untaxed until dividend payment or
withdrawal from the regime.
Under US Gaap, provisions have to be made for deferred tax on
earned pre-taxed income.
Financial instruments
Derivative financial instruments are used to hedge our exposure
to changes in foreign exchange (principally between the
Norwegian Kroner and the U.S. dollar) from operational,
financing and investment activities. In accordance with our
treasury policy, derivative financial instruments are not held
or entered into for trading or speculative purposes. However,
derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are
accounted for as trading instruments in Other financial
income (loss).
Derivative financial instruments are stated at fair value. The
change in fair value of fair value hedges is recognized
immediately in the income statement.
On December 31, 2004, the Company did not have any
outstanding derivative financial instruments which qualified for
hedge accounting.
Embedded derivatives in long-term contracts in foreign
currencies (primarily U.S. dollars) are recorded in the
balance sheet at fair value and revenues and expenses with a
non-U.S. client or
supplier are recognized at the forward exchange rate negotiated
at the beginning of the contract. The variation of fair market
value of the embedded derivative foreign exchange contract is
recognized in earnings.
Segment reporting
The Group is operating in three business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
the Towed seismic segment performs seismic
services for a specific customer; |
|
|
|
the Multi-client segment sells seismic
surveys to be licensed to customers on a non-exclusive basis;
and, |
|
|
|
the 4C/4D/ OBS segment performs seabed
seismic operations with high-tech project-based assignments. |
Each of the business segments is managed separately because each
business segment performs distinct services.
Group management internally evaluates its performance based upon
those four segments, for which operating revenues, operating
income, total assets and capital expenditures are disclosed in
note 15.
New accounting standards
The Group considers that the following new U.S. accounting
standards
EITF 02-14
Whether an Investor Should Apply the Equity Method of
Accounting to Investments Other than Common Stocks,
EITF 03-13
Applying the Conditions of Paragraph 42 of
SFAS 144 Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
EITF 04-08
The Effect of Contingently Instruments on Diluted Earnings
per Share, SFAS 123R Share-based
Payment An Amendment of Statement 123,
SFAS 151 Inventory Costs, an Amendment of ARB 43,
Chapter 4 and SFAS 153 Exchange of
Non-Monetary Assets are not expected to have a significant
impact on its 2004 financial statements.
Note 2 Significant Events, Acquisitions and
Divestitures
Exploration Resources ASA, formerly named Polar Seismikk ASA,
was incorporated on August 17, 2004 for the purpose of
being the parent of the Group, following demerger of Rieber
Shippings seismic activities.
On August 17, 2004, Exploration Resources ASA acquired 3.3%
of Multiwave Geophysical Company AS leading to a total ownership
of 52.8%. As a result, the investment in Multiwave Geophysical
Company AS was
F-98
accounted for using the equity method for the period from
January 1, 2004 to August 17, 2004 and consolidated
from August 18, 2004 to December 31, 2004 at the
percentage of interest of 52.8%.
On January 6, 2005, the Extraordinary Shareholders meetings
of Rieber Shipping and the Exploration Resources ASA approved
the demerger of Rieber Shippings seismic activities.
Through the demerger, the previous Rieber Shipping company was
dissolved and its business was transferred partly in Exploration
Resources (seismic activities) and in the new Rieber Shipping
company (shipping company). Certain operations, namely the time
charter party agreements with Fugro, have been reflected in
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Note 3 Trade Accounts and
Notes Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of Nok) | |
Trade accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
101.2 |
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable net
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Cost | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of Nok) | |
Bunkers oil
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Supplies
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Other Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of Nok) | |
Prepaid tax
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Derivative on sales contract
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Other receivable Rieber
Shipping(a)
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
Other(b)
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
84.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other receivables include receivables from Rieber Shipping and
cash held by Rieber Shipping companies for
NOK 37.4 million and NOK 22.6 million
respectively, which at the year-end had not been paid to the
Group as part of the demerger process. These amounts were paid
in full to the Group in February 2005. |
|
(b) |
|
includes mainly short-term deposits and advances to suppliers. |
F-99
Note 6 Investments in Multiwave Geophysical
Company AS
|
|
|
|
|
Roll-forward |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of Nok) | |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Investments made during the year
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Equity in income
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Dividends received during the year, reduction in share capital
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Impact of change in consolidation method on Multiwave
|
|
|
(17.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key figures relating to Multiwave Geophysical Companys
financial statements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of Nok) | |
Current assets
|
|
|
72.8 |
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
84.7 |
|
Non current liabilities
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
290.4 |
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Note 7 Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Analysis of Property, plant and equipment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of Nok) | |
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
64.8 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment net
|
|
|
52.4 |
|
Vessels
|
|
|
409.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(261.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Vessels net
|
|
|
148.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment net
|
|
|
200.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-100
|
|
|
|
|
Roll-forward |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of Nok) | |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
186.4 |
|
Additions
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
Additions through capital lease
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(66.1 |
) |
Disposals
|
|
|
(41.2 |
) |
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Impact of change in consolidation method on Multiwave
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
200.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Details of assets held under capital leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Acc. Dep. | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Geophysical equipment
|
|
|
64.8 |
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
52.4 |
|
Vessels
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
(60.4 |
) |
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
168.9 |
|
|
|
(72.8 |
) |
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An impairment test was performed on the carrying value of
long-term assets. The impairment test of the seismic vessels was
carried out comparing the total of the undiscounted future
cash-flow generated by each vessel to its net book value at the
year-end. No impairment charge was booked as a result of this
analysis.
Repairs and maintenance expenses
Included in cost of operations was an amount of
NOK 1.3 million in 2004 representing repairs and
maintenance expense.
Note 8 Intangible Assets, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Multi-client surveys
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(63.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Multi-client surveys net
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible assets net
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roll-forward |
|
Year 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Additions
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-101
Note 9 Other Current Liabilities
The analysis of other current liabilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Debt to Rieber Shipping
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
Value added tax and other taxes payable
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Unrealized exchange losses on forward contracts
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Long Term Debt
Analysis of long-term debt by type is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Current | |
|
Long-term | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Bank loans
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
138.2 |
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans
At December 31, 2004, NOK 94.4 million of bank
loans were secured by tangible assets and receivables.
Analysis of long-term debt (including amounts due within one
year) by currency is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of long-term debt (including amounts due within one
year) by interest rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Variable rates bank loans (effective rate December 31,
2004: LIBOR + 0.9%
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
Variable rate on lease Polar Search: (effective rate
December 31, 2004: LIBOR + 1.25%)
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
Variable rate on leases in MGC: (effective rate
December 31, 2004: 3.455% 4.310%)
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
Fixed rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rates generally are based on inter-bank
offered rates of the related currency. The impact of hedging
instruments has not been considered in the above table.
Capital lease debts are secured by the underlying assets.
The annual maturities of long-term debt are set forth in
Note 14.
F-102
The covenants under the USD 10.6 million DnB Nor
loans to Exploration Vessel Resources II AS (formerly named
Polar Search AS) and the USD 5 million DnB
Nor loan to Exploration Vessel Resources AS (formerly named
Polar Duke AS) require that:
|
|
|
|
|
the guarantors working capital on a consolidated basis
should not be less than the higher of the sum of one years
ordinary installments and NOK 25 million. |
|
|
|
the guarantors reported (book) equity on consolidated
basis should not fall below 30% of the book value of the total
assets in the group. |
These financial covenants were guaranteed by Rieber
Shipping ASA for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
as such the covenants apply to their consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2004.
The NOK 20 million bank overdraft facility granted by
DnB Nor to Multiwave is secured by accounts receivable and
tangible assets. Book value of assets pledged as security was
NOK 67.7 million at December 31, 2004. The
covenant on this bank overdraft facility requires the equity
ratio to be at least 17% at December 31, 2004. The required
ratio was not fulfilled at year end. The equity is further
reduced in March 31, 2005 to NOK 7.4 million,
which gives an equity ratio of 5.4%.
On October 12, 2005, Multiwave Geophysical Company renewed
its multi-currency overdraft facility and guarantee facility for
respective amounts of NOK 35 and 5 million.
This overdraft facility agreement requires that the following
ratios be respected:
(a) positive working capital;
(b) ratio of equity over total
assets should not be less than 30%; and
(c) ratio of debt over EBITDA shall
be less than 6 times the annual EBITDA.
The ratios calculated at September 30, 2005 did not meet
the conditions required.
On December 21, 2005, Multiwave Geophysical Company
obtained a waiver of the financial covenant Debt/EBITDA. The
remaining conditions (positive working capital and Equity/Total
assets) must still be upheld.
Note 11 Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Retirement indemnity provisions
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plan
The Group records retirement indemnity provisions based on the
following actuarial assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
historical staff turnover and standard mortality schedule; |
|
|
|
age of retirement: 60 years old; and |
|
|
|
actuarial rate: 5.00% and average rate of increase in future
compensation: 3.50%. |
F-103
The status of the defined benefit retirement indemnity plans is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Accumulated benefit obligation (unvested)
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Unrecognized loss arising from change in assumed discount rate
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Accrued provision
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Amortization of transition amount
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net pension cost (net of administration charge)
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Administration charge
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Curtailment
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Contribution to plan net of administration charge
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net changes
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Key assumptions used in estimating the Groups retirement
obligations are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
Average rate of increase in future compensation
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
Defined contribution plan
The Group paid and recorded as personnel costs in 2004
NOK 0.3 million as part of the contribution plan for
the On-shore and office employees.
Note 12 Dividends and Stock Option Plans
Dividend rights
Dividends may be distributed from the statutory retained
earnings, subject to the requirements of Norwegian law and the
Groups articles of incorporation.
NOK 7.8 millions dividends were paid to the
shareholders of Rieber Shipping ASA in 2004.
Stock options
There are no stock options outstanding to employees, executive
officers or directors of the Group as of December 31, 2004.
Note 13 Financial Instruments
Foreign currency exposure management
The reporting currency for the Groups combined financial
statements is the NOK. However, as a result of having primarily
customers that operate in the oil and gas industry, a
significant portion of the Groups operating revenues are
denominated in currencies other than the NOK, primarily the
U.S. dollar.
As a result, the Groups sales and operating income are
exposed to the effects of fluctuations in the value of the NOK
versus other currencies, primarily the U.S. dollar.
F-104
The Group maintains a portion of its financing in
U.S. dollars. At December 31, 2004, the Groups
debt denominated in U.S. dollars amounted to
U.S.$17 million. The Group is a party to certain forward
exchange contracts as of December 31, 2004, designed to
hedge against foreign currency exchange fluctuations.
In order to protect against the reduction in the value of future
foreign currency cash flows, the Group follows a policy of
selling U.S. dollars forward at average contract maturity
dates that the Group attempts to match with future net
U.S. dollar cash flows (revenues less costs in
U.S. dollars) to be generated by firm contract commitments
in its backlog generally over the ensuing six months. This
foreign currency risk management strategy has enabled the Group
to reduce, but not eliminate, the positive or negative effects
of exchange movements with respect to these currencies.
Details of forward exchange contracts and of other foreign
exchange hedging instruments as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
Notional amount (in millions of U.S.$)
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
of which forward sales qualifying as cash-flow
hedges
|
|
|
|
|
of which forward sales not qualifying as cash-flow
hedges
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Weighted average maturity
|
|
|
106 days |
|
Weighted average forward NOK/U.S.$ exchange rate
|
|
|
6.4043 |
|
Unrealized exchange gains (in millions of NOK)
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
As of December 31, 2004, we did not have any outstanding
derivative financial instruments that qualified for hedge
accounting.
Interest rate risk management
The Group maintained interest rate swap agreements to reduce the
sensitivity to increases in interest rates of its interest
expense on variable-rate debt.
Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Groups
financial instruments are as follows (positive amounts are
assets, amounts in parenthesis are liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Bank overdraft facilities
|
|
|
(38.2 |
) |
|
|
(38.2 |
) |
Bank loans, vendor equipment financing and shareholder loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate
|
|
|
(138.4 |
) |
|
|
(138.4 |
) |
|
Fixed rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
Commodity swap Brent Blend
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
The Group considers the carrying value for loans receivable and
other investments, trade accounts and notes receivable, other
receivables, trade accounts and notes payable and other current
liabilities to be the most representative estimate of fair value.
For variable-rate bank loans, vendor equipment financing and the
shareholder loans, fair values approximate carrying values.
F-105
The fair values of foreign currency exchange contracts are
estimated based on current forward exchange rates for contracts
with comparable maturities.
Note 14 Contractual Obligations, Commitments
and Contingencies
Contractual obligations
The Group leases vessels and geophysical equipment under capital
lease agreements expiring at various dates during the next five
years.
Other lease agreements relate primarily to operating leases for
offices and computer equipment.
Rental expense, including time charter expenses, amounted to
NOK 101 million in 2004.
The following table presents payments in future periods relating
to contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
|
|
1 year | |
|
1-3 years | |
|
4-5 years | |
|
5 years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in million of Nok) | |
Long-term debt
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.1 |
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
142.9 |
|
|
|
87.0 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other commitments
Outstanding commitments at December 31, 2004 include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Guarantees issued in favor of
clients(a)
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Guarantees issued in favor of banks
|
|
|
|
|
Other
guarantees(b)
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Guarantees issued in favor of clients relate primarily to
performance bonds, direct guarantees given for bids at the
bidder level. |
|
(b) |
|
Other guarantees relate primarily to guarantees given to third
parties for payment of rents. |
There are no significant commitments for capital expenditures at
December 31, 2004.
The duration of the guarantees is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due date | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
|
|
1 year | |
|
1-3 years | |
|
4-5 years | |
|
5 years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in million of Nok) | |
Guarantees issued in favor of clients
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Guarantees issued in favor of banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other guarantees
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These guarantees are not reflected in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
F-106
Legal proceedings, claims and other contingencies
The Group is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business and has various
unresolved claims pending. The outcome of these lawsuits and
claims is not known at this time. The Group believes that the
resulting liability, if any, net of amounts recoverable from
insurance or other sources, will not have a material adverse
effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial
position, or cash flows.
Note 15 Analysis by Operating Segment and
Geographic Zone
The following tables present revenues, operating income,
depreciation & amortization, capital expenditures and
identifiable assets by operating segment, revenues by geographic
zone (by origin) as well as net sales by geographic zone based
on the location of the customer. The Group principally services
the oil and gas exploration and production industry and
currently operates in three industry segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Towed seismic, which consist of marine seismic acquisition; |
|
|
|
Multi-client, which consist of acquiring and selling seismic
library; |
|
|
|
4C/4D/OBS, which consist of seabed marine seismic acquisition. |
In 2004, the Groups two most significant customers
accounted for 45% and 32% of the Groups combined revenues.
Analysis by operating segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Towed seismic
|
|
|
378.8 |
|
Multi-client
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
4C/4D/OBS
|
|
|
102.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
497.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Towed seismic
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Multi-client
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
4C/4D/OBS
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Towed seismic
|
|
|
52.7 |
|
Multi-client
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
4C/4D/OBS
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
75.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Towed seismic
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
Multi-client
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
4C/4D/OBS
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
96.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Towed seismic
|
|
|
290.9 |
|
Multi-client
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
4C/4D/OBS
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
409.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-107
Analysis by geographic zone
Analysis of operating revenues by location of
customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
of Nok) | |
Europe
|
|
|
410.5 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
Asia-Pacific/Middle East
|
|
|
60.8 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Africa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Americas
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined total
|
|
|
497.3 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of operating revenues by origin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Europe
|
|
|
497.3 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Asia-Pacific/Middle East
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Africa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined total
|
|
|
497.3 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the Group charters vessels to a charterer, the charterer is
free to trade the vessel worldwide and as of a result the
geographical information for assets is impracticable.
Note 16 Other Revenues and Expenses, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Other revenues (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-recurring revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on sale of assets
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues (expenses) net
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
The gain on sale of assets resulted from the sale of the seismic
vessel Geo Explorer in April 2004. The vessel was acquired
in February 2004. The net proceeds for sale of this vessel
is NOK 61.2 millions.
Note 17 Financial Expenses, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Financial income on derivatives
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Financial expense
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
Financial income
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expense net
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-108
Note 18 Income Taxes
Income tax
Income tax expense consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Current income taxes
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
During the year 2004, income tax expenses recognized was
NOK 0.9 million since companies under the tax tonnage
scheme do not pay income tax on operational income (only certain
financial items and dividends distributed are taxable) and
companies outside the tax tonnage scheme had taxable results
that were approximately break-even.
Deferred taxes related primarily to undistributed reserves from
companies under the tonnage tax regime.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities
Net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Deferred tax assets temporary differences
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets tax losses carried forward
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Total Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax, net
|
|
|
(38.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
The net operating loss carryforward of NOK 1.8 million
was available as of December 31, 2004 and can only be used
within the tonnage tax regime.
Note 19 PERSONNEL
The analysis of personnel is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Personnel employed under Norwegian contracts 4C/4D/ OBC
|
|
|
67 |
|
Towed seismic
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
The total compensation expense of personnel employed by
consolidated subsidiaries was NOK 79.7 million in 2004.
Note 20 Directors Remuneration
In 2004, directors remuneration was
NOK 1.6 million. This remuneration includes only
Multiwave Geophysical Company directors remuneration.
F-109
Note 21 Related Party Transactions
Operating transactions
As of December 31, 2004, NOK 37.4 million
corresponding to the net difference between assets and
liabilities transferred through the demerger of Rieber Shipping,
which Rieber Shipping owed to Exploration Resources, are
presented as Other current assets.
As of December 31, 2004, NOK 22.6 million
corresponding to cash balances on seismic activities that were
legally owned by Rieber Shipping are also presented as
Other current assets.
Also as part of the demerger, Rieber Shipping transferred a
receivable on Electro Silica for an amount of MNOK 18.0,
presented as Trade receivables. Contra entry with
new Rieber Shipping ASA is presented as
Current liabilities.
In 2004, Multiwave paid NOK 22.3 million to Rieber
Shipping in time charter hire charges.
Financing
No credit facility or loan was granted to the Group by the
owners during the period presented.
Note 22 Supplementary Cash Flow
Information
Cash paid for income taxes and interest was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions of Nok) | |
Interest
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of income taxes is linked to previous year.
Note 23 Subsequent Events
On February 17, 2005, Exploration Resources launched a
Public Offering, which conducted in a capital increase of
NOK 233.8 million (including the Green
Shoe).
On March 8, 2005, Exploration Resources was listed on the
Oslo Stock Market under the ticker code ExRe.
On July 17, 2005, Multiwave Geophysical Company ASA
(Multiwave), Exploration Resourcess subsidiary
focusing on seabed acquisition, and Exploration Seismic AS, a
fully owned subsidiary of Exploration Resources, agreed to merge
with minority shareholders of Multiwave receiving newly issued
shares of Exploration Resources in exchange for their shares.
Due to completion of legal period, the merger effectively took
place on October 17, 2005.
On August 29, 2005, Compagnie Générale de
Géophysique (CGG), a French company listed on
the Paris and the
New-York Stock
Exchange, acquired a controlling stake of 60% of Exploration
Resources ASA (Exploration Resources). CGG
continued to acquire shares of Exploration Resources and, by
September 15, CGG had acquired 92% of issued shares and 94%
of voting rights of Exploration Resources. All shares were
acquired at a purchase price of NOK 340 per share.
On September 30, 2005, CGG acquired all of the remaining
shares in Exploration Resources in a combined mandatory offer,
in accordance with the Norwegian Securities Trading Act, and
squeeze-out, in accordance with the Norwegian Public Limited
Companies Act, both at a price of NOK 340 per share
for 529,113 shares. This price represented a premium of
8.3% to the closing price of NOK 314 for the shares of
Exploration Resources on August 26, 2005, the latest date
before the acquisition was announced.
On October 14, 2005, in connection with the remaining
shares acquired by CGG, the mandatory offer period expired, and
was accepted by holders of 314,426 shares. Holders of the
remaining 214,687 shares have the right
F-110
to object to or reject the offered redemption price of
NOK 340 by November 16, 2005. If they do not do so by
that date, they will receive the offered redemption price within
the following two weeks in exchange for their shares.
On October 19, 2005, the merger of Multiwave Geophysical
Company ASA (Multiwave) and Exploration
Seismic AS became effective and CGG purchased all of the
new Exploration Resources shares issued to former Multiwave
minority shareholders at a price of NOK 340 per share.
On October 19, 2005, CGG also purchased from the CEO and
CFO of Exploration Resources stock options for a total of
93,202 shares, representing all of the stock options
currently outstanding in Exploration Resources, for
NOK 340 per share.
Exploration Resources was listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange
under the ticker code EXRE until October 19,
2005.
F-111
Arabian Geophysical & Surveying Company Limited
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
F-112
AUDITORS REPORT TO THE PARTNERS OF
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Arabian
Geophysical & Surveying Company Limited, expressed in Saudi
Riyals, as of 31 December 2005, 2004 and 2003 and the
related statements of income, cash flows and changes in
partners equity for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which are
substantially the same as those followed in the United States of
America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Arabian Geophysical & Surveying Company Limited, as of
31 December 2005, 2004 and 2003 and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with accounting standards generally accepted in the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia vary in certain significant respects from accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The significant differences between the accounting principles
generally accepted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and those
generally accepted in the United States of America so far as
concerns the financial statements referred to are summarised in
note 20 to the accompanying financial statements.
for Ernst & Young
Abdulaziz Saud Alshubaibi
Certified Public Accountant
Saudi Registration No. 339
Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia
26 January 2006
F-113
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at 31 December 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Note | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
ASSETS EMPLOYED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
148,187,403 |
|
|
|
121,111,759 |
|
|
|
174,344,719 |
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11,181,732 |
|
|
|
7,961,714 |
|
|
|
4,890,999 |
|
Accounts receivable and prepayments
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
127,578,318 |
|
|
|
101,800,723 |
|
|
|
85,954,484 |
|
Bank balances and cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,622,483 |
|
|
|
104,151,363 |
|
|
|
85,090,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,382,533 |
|
|
|
213,913,800 |
|
|
|
175,936,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accruals
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
22,433,138 |
|
|
|
12,078,475 |
|
|
|
29,952,747 |
|
Current portion of term loans
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,900,000 |
|
Zakat and income tax payable
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15,908,684 |
|
|
|
17,166,077 |
|
|
|
12,390,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,341,822 |
|
|
|
29,244,552 |
|
|
|
73,243,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,040,711 |
|
|
|
184,669,248 |
|
|
|
102,693,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364,228,114 |
|
|
|
305,781,007 |
|
|
|
277,037,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUNDS EMPLOYED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
36,000,000 |
|
|
|
36,000,000 |
|
|
|
36,000,000 |
|
Statutory reserve
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
General reserve
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4,646,910 |
|
|
|
4,646,910 |
|
|
|
4,646,910 |
|
Capital reserve
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13,999,304 |
|
|
|
13,392,139 |
|
|
|
6,961,297 |
|
Reserve for employees training
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272,939,576 |
|
|
|
217,433,007 |
|
|
|
162,775,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,585,790 |
|
|
|
292,472,056 |
|
|
|
231,384,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,866,667 |
|
Employees terminal benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,642,324 |
|
|
|
13,308,951 |
|
|
|
10,787,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,642,324 |
|
|
|
13,308,951 |
|
|
|
45,653,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364,228,114 |
|
|
|
305,781,007 |
|
|
|
277,037,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The attached notes 1 to 20 form part of these
financial statements.
F-114
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
INCOME STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Note | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Contracts revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359,398,833 |
|
|
|
324,889,670 |
|
|
|
306,295,873 |
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262,462,397 |
) |
|
|
(227,316,493 |
) |
|
|
(223,800,880 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.936,436 |
|
|
|
97,573,177 |
|
|
|
82,494,993 |
|
General and administration expenses
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(5,253,509 |
) |
|
|
(4,870,222 |
) |
|
|
(5,038,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM MAIN OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,682,927 |
|
|
|
92,702,955 |
|
|
|
77,456,450 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
4,439,959 |
|
|
|
7,778,330 |
|
|
|
812,163 |
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,740 |
) |
|
|
(1,150,521 |
) |
Financial charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,152 |
) |
|
|
(1,352,685 |
) |
|
|
(3,633,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME FOR THE YEAR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,113,734 |
|
|
|
99,087,860 |
|
|
|
73,484,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The attached notes 1 to 20 form part of these
financial statements.
F-115
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
96,113,734 |
|
|
|
99,087,860 |
|
|
|
73,484,460 |
|
Adjustments for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
76,023,171 |
|
|
|
62,855,322 |
|
|
|
64,333,171 |
|
|
(Profit)/loss on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
(607,165 |
) |
|
|
(6,430,842 |
) |
|
|
858,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,529,740 |
|
|
|
155,512,340 |
|
|
|
138,676,451 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(3,220,018 |
) |
|
|
(3,070,715 |
) |
|
|
1,418,358 |
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(25,777,595 |
) |
|
|
(15,846,239 |
) |
|
|
31,543,715 |
|
|
Payables
|
|
|
26,270,446 |
|
|
|
18,880,156 |
|
|
|
10,241,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from operations
|
|
|
168,802,573 |
|
|
|
155,475,542 |
|
|
|
181,880,100 |
|
Employees terminal benefits, net
|
|
|
2,333,373 |
|
|
|
2,521,890 |
|
|
|
2,350,914 |
|
Zakat and income tax paid
|
|
|
(17,173,176 |
) |
|
|
(12,598,742 |
) |
|
|
(11,424,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
153,962,770 |
|
|
|
145,398,690 |
|
|
|
172,806,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(103,265,814 |
) |
|
|
(10,789,409 |
) |
|
|
(13,436,425 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
774,164 |
|
|
|
7,597,889 |
|
|
|
6,365,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(102,491,650 |
) |
|
|
(3,191,520 |
) |
|
|
(7,071,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loans, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,766,667 |
) |
|
|
(111,650,000 |
) |
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(40,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(57,380,000 |
) |
|
|
(18,620,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(40,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(123,146,667 |
) |
|
|
(130,270,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN BANK BALANCES AND CASH
|
|
|
11,471,120 |
|
|
|
19,060,503 |
|
|
|
35,465,474 |
|
Bank balances and cash at the beginning of the year
|
|
|
104,151,363 |
|
|
|
85,090,860 |
|
|
|
49,625,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BANK BALANCES AND CASH AT THE END OF THE YEAR
|
|
|
115,622,483 |
|
|
|
104,151,363 |
|
|
|
85,090,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The attached notes 1 to 20 form part of these
financial statements.
F-116
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Reserve for | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory | |
|
General | |
|
Capital | |
|
employees | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Capital | |
|
reserve | |
|
reserve | |
|
reserve | |
|
training | |
|
earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Balance at 31 December 2002
|
|
|
36,000,000 |
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,646,910 |
|
|
|
7,820,117 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
126,432,709 |
|
|
|
195,899,736 |
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,484,460 |
|
|
|
73,484,460 |
|
Provision for zakat and income tax (note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.390,391 |
) |
|
|
(12,390,391 |
) |
Zakat and income tax reimburseable by the partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,390,391 |
|
|
|
12,390,391 |
|
Transfer from capital reserve (note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(858,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
858,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer to retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,134,170 |
) |
|
|
2.134,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer to reserve for employees training (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,134,170 |
|
|
|
(2,134,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends relating to 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(38,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2003
|
|
|
36,000,000 |
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,646,910 |
|
|
|
6,961,297 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
162,775,989 |
|
|
|
231,384,196 |
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,087,860 |
|
|
|
99,087,860 |
|
Provision for zakat and income tax (note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,374,428 |
) |
|
|
(17,374,428 |
) |
Zakat and income tax reimburseable by the partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,374,428 |
|
|
|
17,374,428 |
|
Transfer to capital reserve (note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,430,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,430,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfer to retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,077,836 |
) |
|
|
2,077,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer to reserve for employees training (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,077,836 |
|
|
|
(2,077,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends relating to 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(38,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2004
|
|
|
36,000,000 |
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,646,910 |
|
|
|
13,392,139 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
217,433,007 |
|
|
|
292,472,056 |
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,113,734 |
|
|
|
96,113,734 |
|
Provision for zakat and income tax (note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,915,783 |
) |
|
|
(15,915,783 |
) |
Zakat and income tax reimburseable by the partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,915,783 |
|
|
|
15,915,783 |
|
Transfer to capital reserve (note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(607,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfer to retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,730,387 |
) |
|
|
1,730,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer to reserve for employees training (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,730,387 |
|
|
|
(1,730,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends relating to 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(40,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2005
|
|
|
36,000,000 |
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,646,910 |
|
|
|
13,999,304 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
272,939,576 |
|
|
|
348,585,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The attached notes 1 to 20 form part of these
financial statements.
F-117
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
31 December 2005
1 ACTIVITIES
The company is a Limited Liability Company registered in Saudi
Arabia under Commercial Registration number 2051001444 dated 28
Muharram 1389H corresponding to 15 March 1969.
The company is engaged in geophysical and related activities
necessary for the exploration and development of hydro-carbons.
The company is owned 51% by Industrialisation and Energy
Services Company, a (closed) joint stock company registered in
Saudi Arabia and 49% by Compagnie Generale de Geophysique (CGG),
a company registered in France.
2 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting standards generally accepted in the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia. The significant accounting policies adopted are as
follows:
Accounting convention
The financial statements are prepared under the historical cost
convention.
Depreciation
Freehold land is not depreciated. All property and equipment are
initially recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided on all
property and equipment on a straight line basis at rates
calculated to write off the cost of each asset over its expected
useful life.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable
value after making due allowance for any obsolete or slow moving
items. Cost is determined on a first-in first-out basis (see
note 4).
Zakat and income tax
Zakat and income tax are provided for in accordance with Saudi
Arabian fiscal regulations. The liability is charged to retained
earnings. Accordingly, any reimbursements by the partners of
such zakat and income tax are credited to retained earnings.
Employees terminal benefits
Provision is made for amounts payable under the Saudi Arabian
labour law applicable to employees accumulated periods of
service at the balance sheet date.
Contract revenue and profit recognition
Contract revenues represents the value of work performed, which
comprise the billed and accrued, value of work executed by the
company during the year. The value of work performed but not
billed at the balance sheet date is treated as unbilled
receivable.
F-118
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Foreign currencies
transactions in foreign currencies are recorded in Saudi Riyals
at the rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are
retranslated at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet
date. All differences are taken to the statement of income.
Expenses
Employee related costs, depreciation and training expenses are
charged to operating costs. All other expenses are classified as
general and administration expenses.
3 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The estimated useful lives of the assets for the calculation of
depreciation are as follows:
|
|
|
Camp and Geophysical equipment
|
|
3 to 5 years (2004:
51/3 years) |
Vehicles
|
|
4 to 5 years (2004: 4 to
51/3 years) |
Others
|
|
4 to 5 years (2004:
51/3 years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camp and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freehold | |
|
Geophysical | |
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
Total | |
|
Total | |
|
|
land | |
|
equipment | |
|
Vehicles | |
|
Others | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the beginning of the year
|
|
|
1,382,000 |
|
|
|
366,802,316 |
|
|
|
58,922,918 |
|
|
|
4,215,639 |
|
|
|
431,322,873 |
|
|
|
457,716,818 |
|
|
|
521,502,125 |
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
9,512,745 |
|
|
|
76,520,246 |
|
|
|
17,077,632 |
|
|
|
155,191 |
|
|
|
103,265,814 |
|
|
|
10,789,409 |
|
|
|
13,436,425 |
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,816,565 |
) |
|
|
(1,064,266 |
) |
|
|
(60,620 |
) |
|
|
(15,941,451 |
) |
|
|
(37,183,354 |
) |
|
|
(77,221,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of the year
|
|
|
10,894,745 |
|
|
|
428,505,997 |
|
|
|
74,936,284 |
|
|
|
4,310,210 |
|
|
|
518,647,236 |
|
|
|
431,322,873 |
|
|
|
457,716,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the beginning of the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,770,716 |
|
|
|
50,125,766 |
|
|
|
3,314,632 |
|
|
|
310,211,114 |
|
|
|
283,372,099 |
|
|
|
289,036,600 |
|
|
Charge for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,992,252 |
|
|
|
4,691,143 |
|
|
|
339,776 |
|
|
|
76,023,171 |
|
|
|
62,855,322 |
|
|
|
64,333,171 |
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,649,584 |
) |
|
|
(1,064,251 |
) |
|
|
(60,617 |
) |
|
|
(15,774,452 |
) |
|
|
(36,016,307 |
) |
|
|
(69,997,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313,113,384 |
|
|
|
53,752,658 |
|
|
|
3,593,791 |
|
|
|
370,459,833 |
|
|
|
310,211,114 |
|
|
|
283,372,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2005
|
|
|
10,894,745 |
|
|
|
115,392,613 |
|
|
|
21,183,626 |
|
|
|
716,419 |
|
|
|
148,187,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2004
|
|
|
1,382,000 |
|
|
|
110,031,600 |
|
|
|
8,797,152 |
|
|
|
901,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,111,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2003
|
|
|
1,382,000 |
|
|
|
163,572,447 |
|
|
|
8,508,014 |
|
|
|
882,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,344,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year, the company changed its accounting estimate in
respect of the useful lives of property and equipment to
properly reflect the remaining useful life of the assets. The
change resulted in an increase in depreciation charge for the
year by SR 9 million, consequently the income for the
year is reduced by the same amount. This change in depreciation
rates also has an affect on the net income of future periods up
to 2010.
4 INVENTORIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Equipment spares and others
|
|
|
8,535,353 |
|
|
|
6,697,432 |
|
|
|
4,813,651 |
|
Goods in transit
|
|
|
2,646,379 |
|
|
|
1,264,282 |
|
|
|
77,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,181,732 |
|
|
|
7,961,714 |
|
|
|
4,890,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-119
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Saudi Arabian accounting standards require that the cost of
inventories should be determined using the weighted average
method. The company is in the process of changing its computer
system to enable it to use the weighted average method. In the
meantime, the cost of inventories has been determined on a
first-in first-out method. It is estimated that if the company
had used the weighted average method, the cost of inventories
would not have been materially different.
Inventories are held for internal use only and are not intended
for resale.
5 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND
PREPAYMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
57,120,568 |
|
|
|
48,034,478 |
|
|
|
24,033,667 |
|
Retentions receivable
|
|
|
41,892,370 |
|
|
|
35,159,374 |
|
|
|
51,263,358 |
|
Amounts due from partners (note 17)
|
|
|
14,996,318 |
|
|
|
16,856,091 |
|
|
|
7,617,984 |
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
7,596,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to suppliers
|
|
|
1,661,670 |
|
|
|
208,164 |
|
|
|
723,577 |
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
1,843,450 |
|
|
|
307,976 |
|
|
|
996,515 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
2,467,600 |
|
|
|
1,234,640 |
|
|
|
1,319,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,578,318 |
|
|
|
101,800,723 |
|
|
|
85,954,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All services rendered by the company during the year were to two
customers under four contracts (2004: one customer under three
contracts). All trade accounts receivable are due from these two
customers and all retentions receivable are due from one of
these customers. The customers would normally pay the amount
billed within 30 to 60 days of the date of the invoice and
the balance, held as retentions, upon submission of zakat and
income tax clearance certificate for the relevant year.
Amounts due from the partners represents SR 2,652,675
(2004: SR 2,478,777 and 2003: Nil) due from the Saudi
partner and SR 13,256,542 (2004: SR 14,894,518 and
2003: SR 11,100,507) from CGG (less any pending amount due
to the partner) in respect of zakat and income tax respectively
(see note 8).
6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND
ACCRUALS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
10,943,801 |
|
|
|
6,718,682 |
|
|
|
6,583,563 |
|
Amount due to a partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,051,226 |
|
Amounts due to affiliates (note 17)
|
|
|
1,268,815 |
|
|
|
293,909 |
|
|
|
826,766 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
8,083,410 |
|
|
|
3,967,197 |
|
|
|
4,209,785 |
|
Other payables
|
|
|
2,137,112 |
|
|
|
1,098,687 |
|
|
|
1,281,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,433,138 |
|
|
|
12,078,475 |
|
|
|
29,952,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to the terms offered by the suppliers, trade accounts
payable are normally settled within 30 to 100 days of the
date of invoice.
In 2003, amount due to a partner represented dividend payable of
SR 19,380,000 to the Saudi partner (less amount due from the
partner in respect of zakat).
F-120
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
7 TERM LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Bank loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,766,667 |
|
Less: Non current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,866,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 ZAKAT AND INCOME TAX
a) Zakat
The zakat provision relating to the Saudi partner consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Provision for the year
|
|
|
2,652,142 |
|
|
|
2,271,559 |
|
|
|
1,289,884 |
|
Prior years
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
207,308 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge for the year
|
|
|
2,652,709 |
|
|
|
2,478,867 |
|
|
|
1,290,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Saudi partners provision is based on his share as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Equity
|
|
|
127,230,749 |
|
|
|
98,625,940 |
|
|
|
99,908,866 |
|
Opening provisions and other adjustments
|
|
|
8,317,565 |
|
|
|
5,501,401 |
|
|
|
4,302,435 |
|
Book value of long term assets
|
|
|
(98,450,756 |
) |
|
|
(65,182,687 |
) |
|
|
(91,370,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,097,558 |
|
|
|
38,944,654 |
|
|
|
12,840,532 |
|
Zakatable income for the year
|
|
|
68,988,128 |
|
|
|
51,917,716 |
|
|
|
38,754,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zakat base
|
|
|
106,085,686 |
|
|
|
90,862,370 |
|
|
|
51,595,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Income tax
The income tax provision relating to the foreign partner
consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Provision for the year
|
|
|
13,256,542 |
|
|
|
14,894,518 |
|
|
|
11,100,507 |
|
Prior year
|
|
|
6,532 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge for the year
|
|
|
13,263,074 |
|
|
|
14,895,561 |
|
|
|
11,102,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax has been provided for based on the estimated taxable
income at 20% (2004 and 2003: various rates up to 30%).
The differences between the financial and taxable/ zakatable
income are mainly due to adjustments for certain costs/ claims
based on the relevant fiscal regulations.
F-121
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
c) Movement in provision
The movement in the zakat and income tax provision was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
At the beginning of the year
|
|
|
17,166,077 |
|
|
|
12,390,391 |
|
|
|
11,422,566 |
|
Provided during the year
|
|
|
15,915,783 |
|
|
|
17,374,428 |
|
|
|
12,392,180 |
|
Payments during the year
|
|
|
(17,173,176 |
) |
|
|
(12,598,742 |
) |
|
|
(11,424,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of the year
|
|
|
15,908,684 |
|
|
|
17,166,077 |
|
|
|
12,390,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d) Status of assessments
Zakat and income tax assessments have been agreed with the
Department of Zakat and Income Tax (DZIT) up to 1991 and from
1994 to 1996. Decisions for the years 1992 and 1993 have been
received from the Higher Appeal Committee (HAC) and the company
is awaiting for the revised assessment from the DZIT. A revised
assessment for the years 1997 to 2000 has been raised by the
DZIT showing an overpayment of SR 1 million. An
amended assessment from the DZIT is awaited after correction of
an error in the revised assessment. Assessment for the years
2001 and 2002 has also been received from the DZIT demanding an
additional amount of SR 4.6 million. The company has
appealed against this assessment.
Assessments for the years 2003 and 2004 have not yet been
received.
9 CAPITAL
Capital is divided into 36,000 authorised, issued and fully paid
up shares of SR 1,000 each (2004 and 2003: 36,000 shares).
10 STATUTORY RESERVE
In accordance with Saudi Arabian Regulations for Companies, the
company must set aside 10% of its net income in each year until
it has built up a reserve equal to one half of the capital. This
having been achieved, the company has resolved to discontinue
such transfers. The reserve is not available for distribution.
11 GENERAL RESERVE
There are no restrictions on the distribution of this reserve.
12 CAPITAL RESERVE
An amount equal to the profit on disposal of property, plant and
equipment is transferred from retained earnings to capital
reserve and vice versa in case of loss. Although the capital
reserve is a free reserve, yet it is not intended to be
distributed.
F-122
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
13 RESERVE FOR EMPLOYEES
TRAINING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
At the beginning of the year
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
Transfer to retained earnings
|
|
|
(1,730,387 |
) |
|
|
(2,077,836 |
) |
|
|
(2,134,170 |
) |
Transfer from retained earnings
|
|
|
1,730,387 |
|
|
|
2,077,836 |
|
|
|
2,134,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of the year
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the companys articles of association,
the company can allocate up to 10% of the net income for the
year, subject to a maximum accumulation of
SR 3 million, for training programmes for Saudi
Arabian nationals.
An amount equal to expenses incurred on training during the year
has been transferred to retained earnings.
14 GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATION
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Rent
|
|
|
1,082,246 |
|
|
|
1,178,503 |
|
|
|
1,271,583 |
|
Printing and stationery
|
|
|
1,014,003 |
|
|
|
872,659 |
|
|
|
886,376 |
|
Postage, fax and telephone
|
|
|
570,271 |
|
|
|
587,883 |
|
|
|
642,201 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,586,989 |
|
|
|
2,231,177 |
|
|
|
2,238,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,253,509 |
|
|
|
4,870,222 |
|
|
|
5,038,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Profit on sale of plant and equipment
|
|
|
607,165 |
|
|
|
6,430,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from bank deposits
|
|
|
3,748,749 |
|
|
|
1,347,488 |
|
|
|
812,163 |
|
Other
|
|
|
84,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,439,959 |
|
|
|
7,778,330 |
|
|
|
812,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 OTHER EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Loss on sale of plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
858,820 |
|
Exchange loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,740 |
|
|
|
291,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,740 |
|
|
|
1,150,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In the ordinary course of its business activities, the company
transacts with its affiliates. Such transactions mainly relate
to purchase of fixed assets and equipment spares. During the
year, SR 31.2 million (2004: SR 3.3 million
and 2003: SR 5.9 million) of the companys
geophysical equipment has been acquired from affiliates. The
company also acquired SR 5.6 million (2004:
SR 4.5 million and 2003: SR 5.2 million) of
its
F-123
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
equipment spares and services requirements from its affiliates.
Prices and terms of payments of these transactions are approved
by the management. Amounts due from and due to the partners and
affiliates are disclosed in notes 5 and 6,
respectively.
18 CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
The directors have authorised future capital expenditure
amounting to SR 33 million (2004:
SR 6.5 million and 2003: SR 8.6 million).
19 CONTINGENT LIABILITY
The companys banker has issued payment guarantees to the
DZIT amounting to SR 9,129,001 (2004: SR 9,129,001 and
2003: SR 9,129,001). The bankers of the foreign partner
have provided counter guarantees to the companys banker on
its behalf.
|
|
20 |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES FOLLOWED BY THE COMPANY AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY
ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES |
The financial statements of the company have been prepared in
accordance with accounting standards generally accepted in the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. For purposes of these financial
statements, the following are the significant (recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure) differences between
the companys accounting principles used and United States
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP).
|
|
a. |
Following is a reconciliation of net income to US GAAP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Net income under Saudi accounting standards
|
|
|
96,113,734 |
|
|
|
99,087,860 |
|
|
|
73,484,460 |
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for zakat and income tax (note 8(c))
|
|
|
(15,915,783 |
) |
|
|
(17,374,428 |
) |
|
|
(12,390,391 |
) |
|
Net over payment of zakat and income tax (refer below)
|
|
|
904,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax adjustment for the year
|
|
|
3,787,829 |
|
|
|
43,367 |
|
|
|
84,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income under US GAAP
|
|
|
84,890,411 |
|
|
|
81,756,799 |
|
|
|
61,179,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference in net income between Saudi Standards and US GAAP
|
|
|
11,223,323 |
|
|
|
17,331,061 |
|
|
|
12,305,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference in partners equity between Saudi Accounting
Standards and US GAAP (due to cumulative effect of current
and prior years adjustments)
|
|
|
13,680,456 |
|
|
|
20,735,296 |
|
|
|
15,794,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net over payment relates to the years from 1997 through 2000.
The zakat and income tax assessed for the years 2001 and 2002 is
SR 3,384,450 (i.e. an additional liability of
SR 4,595,128 as there was an overpayment of
SR 1,210,678 per zakat and income tax return) which has not
been taken into consideration in the above reconciliation as the
assessment has been appealed against and the final amount
ultimately payable cannot be determined with reasonable accuracy
(refer note 8(d)).
F-124
ARABIAN GEOPHYSICAL & SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
b. |
Following is a reconciliation of partners equity for
differences with US GAAP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
|
SR | |
Partners equity under Saudi accounting standards
|
|
|
348,585,790 |
|
|
|
292,472,056 |
|
|
|
231,384,196 |
|
Cumulative effect of current and prior year adjustments
(note 20(a))
|
|
|
(13,680,456 |
) |
|
|
(20,735,296 |
) |
|
|
(15,794,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners equity under US GAAP
|
|
|
334,905,334 |
|
|
|
271,736,760 |
|
|
|
215,589,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid during the year amounting to SR 40,000,000
(2004: SR 38,000,000 and 2003: SR 38,000,000) included
payments to the partners on account of zakat and income tax
equalisation.
Financial instruments comprise of financial assets and
liabilities.
Financial assets consist of bank balances and cash and
receivables. Financial liabilities consist of payables and
accrued expenses.
Fair values of financial assets and liabilities are not
materially different from their carrying values at the balance
sheet date.
F-125
VERITAS DGC INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER 31, 2006 AND 2005
F-126
VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
October 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per | |
|
|
share amounts) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
230,831 |
|
|
$ |
168,678 |
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
165,792 |
|
|
|
136,666 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
5,404 |
|
|
|
4,902 |
|
Merger and related costs
|
|
|
10,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,432 |
|
|
|
8,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
37,944 |
|
|
|
18,255 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(4,983 |
) |
|
|
(1,901 |
) |
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
40,710 |
|
|
|
20,806 |
|
Provision for income tax expense
|
|
|
13,182 |
|
|
|
9,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
27,528 |
|
|
$ |
11,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
35,973 |
|
|
|
34,689 |
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
$ |
.77 |
|
|
$ |
.34 |
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
40,748 |
|
|
|
36,838 |
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
$ |
.68 |
|
|
$ |
.32 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
27,528 |
|
|
$ |
11,787 |
|
Other comprehensive income (net of tax, $0 in all periods,
except as specified):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of tax provision of
$155)
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
4,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
4,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
28,753 |
|
|
$ |
16,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-127
VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, | |
|
July 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, | |
|
|
except par value) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
353,819 |
|
|
$ |
401,955 |
|
|
Restricted cash investments
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts:
$1,915 in October and $1,895 in July)
|
|
|
238,430 |
|
|
|
215,244 |
|
|
Materials and supplies inventory
|
|
|
7,451 |
|
|
|
6,366 |
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
37,386 |
|
|
|
18,917 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
Current assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
645,614 |
|
|
|
656,157 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
546,225 |
|
|
|
359,683 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
404,342 |
|
|
|
249,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
141,883 |
|
|
|
110,604 |
|
Multi-client data library
|
|
|
324,069 |
|
|
|
296,603 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
41,392 |
|
|
|
41,511 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
22,656 |
|
|
|
22,699 |
|
Noncurrent assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,175,614 |
|
|
$ |
1,158,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
Accounts payable, trade
|
|
|
95,545 |
|
|
|
107,863 |
|
|
Accrued and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
35,131 |
|
|
|
29,224 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
47,581 |
|
|
|
29,280 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
58,256 |
|
|
|
70,313 |
|
|
Current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
391,513 |
|
|
|
412,925 |
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
34,268 |
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
34,268 |
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; issued: 37,376,318 and 37,220,959
shares, respectively
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
503,455 |
|
|
|
492,387 |
|
|
Accumulated earnings
|
|
|
255,904 |
|
|
|
228,376 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
22,645 |
|
|
|
21,783 |
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(9,004 |
) |
|
|
(9,367 |
) |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,357,643 and 1,349,592 shares,
respectively
|
|
|
(23,541 |
) |
|
|
(23,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
749,833 |
|
|
|
710,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,175,614 |
|
|
$ |
1,158,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-128
VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
October 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
27,528 |
|
|
$ |
11,787 |
|
Non-cash items included in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, net (other than multi-client)
|
|
|
14,619 |
|
|
|
9,045 |
|
|
Amortization of multi-client data library
|
|
|
57,925 |
|
|
|
52,840 |
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
(Gain) / loss on disposition of property
|
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(23,023 |
) |
|
|
(5,336 |
) |
|
|
Materials and supplies inventory
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
(13,749 |
) |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
Accrued income tax
|
|
|
6,817 |
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable, deferred revenue and other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(27,808 |
) |
|
|
(44,504 |
) |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
42,676 |
|
|
|
29,397 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in multi-client data library, net cash
|
|
|
(80,901 |
) |
|
|
(61,622 |
) |
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(19,221 |
) |
|
|
(11,451 |
) |
|
Proceeds from involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(99,044 |
) |
|
|
(59,435 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of common stock
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
6,560 |
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation
|
|
|
5,588 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
Principal payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
7,878 |
|
|
|
6,922 |
|
Currency gain on foreign cash
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(48,136 |
) |
|
|
(21,422 |
) |
Beginning cash and cash equivalents balance
|
|
|
401,955 |
|
|
|
249,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents balance
|
|
$ |
353,819 |
|
|
$ |
227,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization of depreciation and amortization resulting in an
increase in multi-client data library
|
|
$ |
3,612 |
|
|
$ |
5,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-129
VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Summary of significant accounting policies
Basis of presentation
These consolidated financial statements are unaudited, but in
the opinion of management, contain all appropriate adjustments,
all of which are normally recurring adjustments unless otherwise
disclosed. These financial statements, including selected notes,
have been prepared in accordance with the applicable rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all of
the information and disclosures required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of
America for complete financial statements. Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior period amounts to
conform to the current period classification. These interim
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements presented in the Veritas DGC
Inc. Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended July 31, 2006.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement
No. 3. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective
application to prior periods financial statements for
changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to
determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative
effect of the change. SFAS 154 also requires that a change
in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for
long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in
accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting
principle. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The implementation of
SFAS No. 154 did not have a material impact on the
companys financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 133 and 150. SFAS No. 155
(a) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid
financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that
otherwise would require bifurcation, (b) clarifies that
certain instruments are not subject to the requirements of
SFAS 133, (c) establishes a requirement to evaluate
interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests
that may contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation,
(d) clarifies what may be an embedded derivative for
certain concentrations of credit risk and (e) amends
SFAS 140 to eliminate certain prohibitions related to
derivatives on a qualifying special-purpose entity.
SFAS 155 is effective for us for the fiscal year beginning
August 1, 2007. The implementation of
SFAS No. 155 is not expected to have a material impact
on the companys financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation
(FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. FIN No. 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
FIN No. 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. The new standard also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods and disclosure. The provisions of
FIN No. 48 are effective for years beginning after
December 15, 2006, which is our fiscal year beginning
August 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating the provisions
of FIN No. 48 to determine the impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. AUG AIR-1, Accounting for Planned Major
Maintenance Activities. This guidance prohibits the use of
the accrue-in-advance
method of accounting for planned major activities because an
obligation has not occurred and therefore a liability should not
be recognized. The provisions of this guidance will be effective
for us for the fiscal year beginning August 1, 2007. We are
currently evaluating the provisions of this guidance to
determine the impact on our consolidated financial statements.
F-130
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosure of fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements,
and accordingly, does not require any new fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for our
financial statements issued related to the fiscal year beginning
August 1, 2008, and interim periods within that year. We
are currently evaluating the effect, if any, that the adoption
of this standard will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and
132®.
SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to:
(a) Recognize in its statement of financial position an
asset for a plans overfunded status or a liability for a
plans underfunded status; (b) Measure a plans
assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as
of the end of the employers fiscal year (with limited
exceptions); (c) Recognize changes in the funded status of
a defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the
changes occur. Those changes will be reported in comprehensive
income. The requirement to recognize the funded status of a
benefit plan and the disclosure requirements are effective for
us as of the end of the fiscal year ending on July 31,
2007. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit
obligations as of the date of our fiscal year-end balance sheet
is effective for us for the fiscal year ending July 31,
2009. We are currently evaluating the provisions of this
guidance to determine the impact on our consolidated financial
statements. Had we adopted SFAS No. 158 as of
July 31, 2006, the impact would have been an increase to
liabilities and a decrease to stockholders equity of
$10 million.
In September 2006, the SEC issued SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Financial
Statements Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year
Financial Statements. SAB No. 108 addresses how
a registrant should quantify the effect of an error in the
financial statements for purposes of assessing materiality and
requires that the effect be computed using both the current year
income statement perspective (rollover) and the year
end balance sheet perspective (iron curtain) methods
for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. If a
change in the method of quantifying errors is required under
SAB No. 108, this represents a change in accounting
policy; therefore, if the use of both methods results in a
larger, material misstatement than the previously applied
method, the financial statements must be adjusted.
SAB No. 108 allows the cumulative effect of such
adjustments to be made to opening retained earnings upon
adoption. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have an
effect on our consolidated financial statements.
2. Business combinations
On September 4, 2006, the Company and Compagnie
Générale de Géophysique (CGG), a
French société anonyme, entered into an Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of September 4, 2006 (the
Merger Agreement), by and among the Company, CGG,
Volnay Acquisition Co. I, a Delaware corporation and wholly
owned subsidiary of CGG (Merger Sub I), and Volnay
Acquisition Co. II, a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
subsidiary of CGG (Merger Sub II), under which CGG
has agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company
(Company Common Stock). Under the terms of the
Merger Agreement, which was approved by the Boards of Directors
of both the Company and CGG, Merger Sub I will merge with and
into the Company with the Company continuing as the surviving
corporation, and immediately thereafter, the Company will merge
with and into Merger Sub II with Merger Sub II continuing as the
surviving corporation as a wholly owned subsidiary of CGG.
Total consideration for the Company Common Stock is fixed at
$1.5 billion in cash and 47 million American
Depository Shares (the ADSs) of CGG, with each ADS
representing one-fifth of an ordinary share, nominal value
2.00 per share,
of CGG (each a CGG Ordinary Share). Under the terms
of the Merger Agreement, stockholders of the Company will have
the right to elect to receive cash or ADSs, subject to a
proration if either cash or stock is oversubscribed. The per
share consideration was initially set at $75.00 in cash or
2.2501 ADSs and is subject to adjustment upwards or downwards so
that each share of Company Common Stock receives consideration
representing equal value. This adjustment, however, will not
increase or decrease the total amount of cash or the total
number of ADSs to be issued in the transaction. Based on the
closing price of CGGs ADSs
F-131
on August 29, 2006, the stockholders of the Company would
receive, in the aggregate, consideration comprised of 51% ADSs
and 49% cash.
Consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement is conditioned upon, among other things,
(1) approval by the stockholders of the Company and CGG,
(2) the receipt of required regulatory approvals as
discussed below and (3) the effectiveness of the
registration statement on
Form F-4 and the
registration statement on
Form F-6 relating
to the ADSs to be issued in the merger. In the event of a
termination of the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances,
the Company or CGG may be required to pay the other party
certain termination fees as more fully explained in the Merger
Agreement filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Veritas DGC Inc.s
Form 8-K dated
September 4, 2006.
The merger was subject to review by the Antitrust Division of
the U.S. Department of Justice, which is referred to as the
Antitrust Division, and the Federal Trade Commission, which is
referred to as the FTC, under the Hart Scott Rodino
(HSR) Act. The Antitrust Division terminated the
waiting period imposed by the HSR Act on October 25, 2006.
CGG and Veritas submitted a notice of the merger to the
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
(CFIUS), in accordance with the regulations
implementing the Exon-Florio Amendment to the Defense Production
Act of 1950, which is referred to as the Exon-Florio Amendment,
and on November 16, 2006, the CFIUS issued a letter stating
that had concluded its action, having found no national security
issues sufficient to warrant further investigation. CGG and
Veritas each conduct business in Norway and each submitted
filings to the Norwegian antitrust authorities, but these
authorities are deemed to have authorized the merger by not
requesting the submission of a full notification. In addition,
CGG and Veritas have each submitted filings to the Brazilian and
United Kingdom antitrust authorities, though the approval of
these authorities is not required to complete the merger.
The merger may also be subject to the regulatory requirements of
other municipal, state, federal and foreign governmental
agencies and authorities, including those relating to the offer
and sale of securities
Upon closing of the transaction, several significant items would
occur, including, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
All of our outstanding stock options would fully vest and
restrictions on most outstanding restricted shares would vest. |
|
|
|
CGG will assume our convertible debt, which would continue to be
fully convertible, and the holders of the debt would have the
option of exercising their put right to CGG. |
|
|
|
Any outstanding borrowings and letters of credit under the
credit facility would be due immediately upon closing of the
transaction. |
|
|
|
A significant amount of severance compensation may be paid to
executives of the company, including the named executive
officers. |
|
|
|
Other material effects of the merger will be more fully
discussed in the proxy statement/prospectus on
Form F-4 which CGG
has filed with the SEC and in the proxy statement/prospectus
relating to the proposed transaction, which will be sent to each
Veritas stockholder in connection with the meeting of Veritas
stockholders that we intend to call to vote to adopt the merger
agreement. |
Due to the pending merger with CGG, on September 5, 2006,
we announced that we terminated discussions with a third party
relating to the possible sale of the Companys land seismic
acquisition business. The depreciation expense of
$2.7 million previously not recorded related to these
assets expected to be sold in fiscal 2006 was recorded in fiscal
2007 as if the assets were not held for sale at any time. For
further discussion related to the assets and liabilities held
for sale, see Note 7, Assets held for sale.
For the three months ended October 31, 2006, we have
incurred $10.3 million in certain merger and related costs.
We terminated discussions with a third party relating to the
possible sale of our land seismic acquisition business, during
the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The $10.3 million
includes fees in connection with the termination of those
discussions, consisting of amounts paid in settlement of all
claims by the third party buyers
F-132
and professional fees, including accounting and legal fees, and
professional fees related to the pending merger with CGG.
3. Earnings per common share
Basic and diluted earnings per common share are computed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
October 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except | |
|
|
per share amounts) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
27,528 |
|
|
$ |
11,787 |
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares (including exchangeable shares)
|
|
|
35,973 |
|
|
|
34,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
$ |
.77 |
|
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares (including exchangeable shares)
|
|
|
35,973 |
|
|
|
34,689 |
|
|
Shares issuable from assumed conversion of notes
|
|
|
4,298 |
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
Shares issuable from assumed exercise of options
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
Shares issuable from the assumed vesting of restricted stock
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
40,748 |
|
|
|
36,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
$ |
.68 |
|
|
$ |
.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shares issuable from assumed conversion of notes for the
three months ended October 31, 2006 are based upon a stock
price of $72.01, which was the closing price of Veritas
DGCs common stock at October 31, 2006. The shares
issuable from assumed conversion of notes for the three months
ended October 31, 2005 are based upon a stock price of
$32.21, which was the closing price of Veritas DGCs common
stock at October 31, 2005.
The following options to purchase common shares have been
excluded from the computation assuming dilution because the
exercise prices of the options exceeded the average market price
for the period of the underlying common shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Number of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,271 |
|
Exercise price range
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33.94 - $55.13 |
|
Expiring through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2012 |
|
4. Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
In January 2005, our seismic vessel Veritas Viking
experienced an engine failure while acquiring data in the Gulf
of Mexico and lost substantial amounts of overboard seismic
equipment. This seismic equipment was insured at its replacement
cost. A gain of $2.0 million was recorded in the
first quarter of fiscal 2006 due to the timing of the
insurance settlements. This $2.0 million gain in the first
fiscal quarter of 2006 was included as a change in the amounts
receivable in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
F-133
5. Income taxes
A reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the
amount computed by applying the U.S. statutory income tax rate
to income before provision for income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months | |
|
|
ending October 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in | |
|
|
thousands) | |
Income tax provision computed at the U.S. statutory rate
|
|
$ |
14,249 |
|
|
$ |
7,282 |
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. activities
|
|
|
(993 |
) |
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
Foreign tax refund
|
|
|
(5,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible merger and related costs
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
13,182 |
|
|
$ |
9,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from non-U.S.
activities includes non-U.S. earnings taxed at other than the
U.S. statutory rate, non-U.S. withholding taxes, U.S. foreign
tax credits, U.S. tax on non-U.S. branch operations or foreign
dividends, foreign tax contingencies and changes in valuation
allowances on foreign deferred taxes.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company recorded a
$5.0 million tax benefit related to a refund received from
a foreign taxing authority with respect to certain prior year
tax matters. In addition, the Company incurred
$10.3 million of non-deductible merger and related costs.
6. Notes payable and debt structure
As of October 31, 2006, our notes payable consisted of
$155.0 million of Convertible Senior Notes due 2024. These
notes are classified as a current liability as of
October 31, 2006 because the conversion feature discussed
below results in the notes being convertible at the option of
the holders.
The Convertible Senior Notes bear interest at a per annum rate
which equals the three-month LIBOR rate, adjusted quarterly,
minus a spread of 0.75%. The interest rate of the notes, from
September 15, 2006 through December 14, 2006, is
4.64%, based on a LIBOR rate of 5.39%. For the first quarter of
fiscal 2007, the weighted average interest rate on the notes was
4.61%. The notes will mature on March 15, 2024 and may not
be redeemed by us prior to March 20, 2009. Holders of the
notes may require us to repurchase some, or all, of the notes on
March 15, 2009, 2014 and 2019. They could also require
repurchase upon a change of control (as defined in the indenture
under which the Convertible Senior Notes were issued).
Under certain circumstances and at the option of the holder, the
Convertible Senior Notes are convertible prior to the maturity
date into cash and shares of our common stock. Certain of these
circumstances may result in classification of the Convertible
Senior Notes as current on our balance sheet. These
circumstances include:
|
|
|
|
1. |
the closing sale price of our common stock is over 120% of the
conversion price, which is currently $24.03 (with 120% being
$28.84) for 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive
trading days ending on the last trading day of the fiscal
quarter preceding the quarter in which the conversion occurs; |
|
|
2. |
if we called the notes for redemption and the redemption has not
occurred; |
|
|
3. |
the occurrence of a five consecutive trading day period in which
the trading price of the notes was less than 95% of the closing
sale price of our common stock on such day multiplied by the
conversion ratio; or |
|
|
4. |
the occurrence of specified corporate transactions. |
Should any of these circumstances occur, the Convertible Senior
Notes would be convertible at the then current stock price times
the conversion ratio of 41.6146. This amount would be payable in
cash equal to the
F-134
principal amount of the notes, the par value adjusted for
dividends or other equity transactions, and the additional
amount payable in shares of our common stock. Currently, the
maximum amount payable by us on conversion is $155 million
in cash plus 6.5 million shares. This settlement method is
prescribed in the indenture and is not at the discretion of any
party. The shares issuable from such conversion are considered
in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
As of the beginning of the second fiscal quarter of 2006, the
Convertible Senior Notes were convertible as the stock price
remained greater than 120% of the Conversion Price for at least
20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days
ending on October 31, 2005. The notes continued to be
convertible as of October 31, 2006. Because of the
convertibility, the notes have been classified as a current
liability on our consolidated balance sheet as of
October 31, 2006. The determination of the convertibility
of the notes occurs quarterly. Depending upon the common stock
price in the future, the notes may not be convertible in future
quarters and therefore would not be classified as current on our
consolidated balance sheet. Assuming a stock price of $72.01
(which was the closing stock price at October 31, 2006),
conversion of all the notes would result in our payment of
$155 million in cash and 4.3 million shares of common
stock.
In connection with our issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes,
we entered into a registration rights agreement pursuant to
which we agreed to register the resale of the notes and
underlying common stock by the holders thereof. If we failed to
keep the shelf registration statement related to this debt
effective or usable in accordance with the registration rights
agreement, then we were required to pay liquidated damages to
all holders of notes and all holders of our common stock issued
upon conversion of the notes. The liquidated damages to be paid
were equal to an annual rate of 0.50% of the principal amount.
In November 2005, the shelf registration statement became no
longer effective and, accordingly, we began accruing liquidated
damages at $2,100 per day. We were not required to register the
resale of the notes and underlying common stock after
March 10, 2006 and therefore, our liability for the payment
of liquidated damages ended on that date.
In addition to the notes, we also have a five-year
$85 million revolving loan agreement with a syndicate of
banks. The facility provides for revolving loans and the
issuance of letters of credit to Veritas DGC Inc. and certain of
its subsidiaries of up to $45 million in the United States,
$15 million in Canada, $15 million in Singapore and
$10 million in the United Kingdom. As of October 31,
2006, there were no borrowings and $5.9 million of
outstanding letters of credit, leaving $79.1 million
available under the revolving loan facility.
The facility is secured by pledges of accounts receivable and
the U.S. land data library, which, when added together,
have a carrying amount of $268 million as of
October 31, 2006. The facility is also secured by certain
intercompany notes and stock in certain Veritas subsidiaries.
Veritas and certain of its subsidiaries have also issued loan
guarantees with respect to certain borrowings. Interest rates on
borrowings under the facility are selected by the borrower at
the time of any advance and the rates so selected may be either
at LIBOR plus 1.00% or the Base Rate (defined as the lesser of
the applicable prime rate or the federal funds rate). These
rates may be adjusted upward depending upon our leverage ratio
(calculated as a ratio of funded debt versus EBITDA for the
previous four quarters) to a maximum of LIBOR plus 1.50% or the
base rate plus 0.50%. The loan agreement and related documents
contain customary financial covenants and default provisions,
including a limit on the amount of cash dividends. These
covenants contain certain financial measurements as of quarter
ending dates, and, as of October 31, 2006, we were in
compliance with these covenants.
We also have various unsecured lines of credit, with lending
institutions that operate in geographic areas not covered by the
lending institutions in our credit facility, totaling
$8.5 million that may be used exclusively for the issuance
of letters of credit and bank guarantees. As of October 31,
2006, $0.4 million in letters of credit were outstanding
under these lines.
F-135
7. Pension plan
We maintain a contributory defined benefit pension plan (the
Plan) for eligible participating employees in the
United Kingdom. The following is the net periodic benefit
cost by component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended October 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Service cost (benefits earned during the period)
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(324 |
) |
Amortization of transition obligation
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Amortization of net (gain)/loss
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit costs
|
|
$ |
928 |
|
|
$ |
714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have made contributions to this plan based on the schedule of
contributions on which the above service cost was based and
expect to complete these contributions, totaling
$1.6 million for the year, during fiscal 2007.
8. Assets held for sale
As of July 31, 2006, it was expected that the land
acquisition seismic business would be sold to a third party with
an expected closing to occur in the second fiscal quarter of
fiscal 2007. The land seismic acquisition business met the
criteria to be considered held for sale and was appropriately
classified as of July 31, 2006 in accordance with
FAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets. Further, $2.7 million of
depreciation expense was not recorded in fiscal year 2006 to
reflect the depreciation expense from the time the assets met
the criteria until the end of fiscal year 2006. The assets held
for sale were included in the NASA and EAME segments. The land
seismic acquisition business was not considered a discontinued
operation due to our continuing involvement in the business
because of anticipated ongoing contracts.
In September 2006, these assets were no longer considered held
for sale due to the pending merger with CGG. According to
FAS 144, when an asset is no longer considered held for
sale, the depreciation expense previously not recorded should be
recognized as if the assets were not held for sale at any time.
Therefore, we recorded $2.7 million of additional
depreciation expense in the first fiscal quarter of 2007. For
further discussion on the pending merger with CGG, see
Note 2, Business combinations.
The geophysical vessel, Veritas Searcher, and certain related
equipment were sold during the first fiscal quarter for
$1 million and a gain of $0.5 million. A new vessel,
the Veritas Voyager was placed into service in July 2006 as
a replacement to the Searcher.
F-136
The amounts reclassified as held for sale as of July 31,
2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Land | |
|
Searcher | |
|
|
|
|
acquisition | |
|
vessel | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in thousands) | |
Materials and inventory
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
Geophysical vessel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,331 |
|
|
|
8,331 |
|
Geophysical equipment
|
|
|
144,096 |
|
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
146,302 |
|
Leasehold improvements and other
|
|
|
23,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
167,959 |
|
|
|
10,537 |
|
|
|
178,496 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(138,003 |
) |
|
|
(10,037 |
) |
|
|
(148,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
29,956 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
30,456 |
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
35,104 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
$ |
35,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
$ |
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
$ |
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Segment information
The company has four reportable segments: North and
South America (NASA); Europe, Africa, Middle East and
Commonwealth of Independent States (EAME); Asia Pacific (APAC);
and Veritas Hampson Russell (VHR). In NASA, EAME and APAC, we
conduct geophysical surveys on both a contract and a
multi-client basis. When we conduct surveys on a contract basis,
we acquire and process data for a single client who pays us to
conduct the survey and owns the data we acquire. When we conduct
surveys on a
multi-client basis, we
acquire and process data for our own account and license that
data and associated products to multiple clients. NASA, EAME and
APAC offer a common suite of these products and services to
their customers, although each product or service may be adapted
to meet the needs of the local markets. VHR licenses geophysical
software and provides geophysical reservoir consulting services.
This segmentation of our company is representative of the manner
in which it is viewed and managed by our senior managers and our
Board of Directors. A reconciliation of the reportable
segments results to those of the total enterprise is given
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended October 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
NASA | |
|
EAME | |
|
APAC | |
|
VHR | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
139,294 |
|
|
$ |
54,248 |
|
|
$ |
32,202 |
|
|
$ |
5,087 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
230,831 |
|
Depreciation and amortization, net (other than multi-client)
|
|
|
9,450 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
14,619 |
|
Amortization of multi-client library
|
|
|
37,082 |
|
|
|
20,749 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,925 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
41,634 |
|
|
|
10,571 |
|
|
|
6,825 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
(21,749 |
) |
|
|
37,944 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
556,877 |
|
|
|
197,009 |
|
|
|
92,453 |
|
|
|
11,457 |
|
|
|
317,818 |
|
|
|
1,175,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended October 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
NASA | |
|
EAME | |
|
APAC | |
|
VHR | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
102,842 |
|
|
$ |
34,769 |
|
|
$ |
26,783 |
|
|
$ |
4,284 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
168,678 |
|
Depreciation and amortization, net (other than multi-client)
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
9,045 |
|
Amortization of multi-client library
|
|
|
36,745 |
|
|
|
16,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,840 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
19,035 |
|
|
|
3,528 |
|
|
|
5,804 |
|
|
|
(662 |
) |
|
|
(9,450 |
) |
|
|
18,255 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
491,099 |
|
|
|
140,136 |
|
|
|
54,077 |
|
|
|
14,637 |
|
|
|
254,517 |
|
|
|
954,466 |
|
Corporate operating income (loss) includes overhead and
certain non-recurring adjustments. The assets within the
Corporate segment consist primarily of cash.
F-137
10. Stock based compensation
As of August 1, 2005, we adopted the Financial Accounting
Standard Board Statement No. 123(R) (SFAS 123R) to
account for stock based employee compensation. SFAS 123R
requires us to record the cost of stock options and other
equity-based
compensation in our income statement based upon the estimated
fair value of those awards. We elected to use the modified
prospective method for adoption, which requires compensation
expense to be recorded for all unvested stock options and other
equity-based compensation beginning in the first quarter of
adoption. Accordingly, prior periods have not been restated to
reflect stock based compensation. For all unvested options
outstanding as of August 1, 2005, the previously measured
but unrecognized compensation expense, based on the fair value
at the original grant date, will be recognized in the statement
of operations over the remaining vesting period. For
equity-based compensation granted subsequent to August 1,
2005, compensation expense, based on the fair value on the date
of grant, will be recognized in the statement of operations over
the vesting period. For deferred share units, it is our policy
to determine the fair value of the units based on our common
stock price at the date of grant which is then expensed over the
applicable service period.
Prior to December 11, 2002, we had two employee
nonqualified stock option plans under which options were granted
to officers and select employees. Options generally vested over
three years and were exercisable over a five to
ten-year period from
the date of grant. The exercise price for each option was the
fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. Our
Board of Directors authorized 5,954,550 shares of common stock
to be issued under these option plans.
Prior to December 11, 2002, we also maintained a stock
option plan for
non-employee directors
(the Director Plan) under which options were granted
to our non-employee
directors. The Director Plan provided that every year each
eligible director was granted options to purchase 5,000 shares
of our common stock which vest over a period of three years
from the date of grant and are exercisable over five to ten
years from the date of grant. The exercise price for each option
granted was the fair market value at the date of grant. The
Board of Directors authorized 600,000 shares of common stock to
be issued under the Director Plan.
On December 11, 2002, we adopted our current Share
Incentive Plan that provides for the issuance to directors,
officers and select employees of: (1) nonqualified options
to purchase our common stock, (2) incentive options to
purchase our common stock, (3) share appreciation rights,
(4) deferred share units, (5) restricted shares and
(6) performance shares. Options issued to employees under
the Share Incentive Plan have exercise prices equal to the fair
market value at the date of grant; have
five-year lives and
vest over three years. Options issued to continuing
non-employee directors
under the Share Incentive Plan have exercise prices equal to the
fair market value at the date of grant, have
five-year lives and
vest immediately. As of October 31, 2006, 1.3 million
shares were reserved for issuance under this plan, with no more
than 0.3 million of those shares issuable in any form other
than stock options.
Information related to stock based compensation follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
October 31, 2006 | |
|
October 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of dollars) | |
Compensation costs recorded for all plans
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
Tax benefit recognized in income statement for share-based
compensation arrangements
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Our policy of meeting the requirements upon exercise of stock
options is to issue new shares.
As of October 31, 2006, there was $6.2 million, of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested
share-based
compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be
recognized on a straight line basis over the remaining vesting
period, generally 2 years.
Stock options
The fair value of each option award granted after August 1,
2005 is estimated on the date of grant using a
lattice-based option
valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following
table. No assumptions are
F-138
listed for the three months ended October 31, 2006 as no
options were granted during this period. Expected volatilities
are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our
stock and historical volatility of our stock. We use historical
data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within
the valuation model; separate groups of employees were reviewed
and shown to have similar historical exercise behavior and are
considered together for valuation purposes. The expected term of
options granted is derived from the output of the option
valuation model and represents the period of time that options
granted are expected to be outstanding. The
risk-free rate for
periods within the contractual life of the option is based on
the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
|
50.8% |
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
|
0% |
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
The following tables provides additional information related to
this stock option plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended October 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted | |
|
Average | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Intrinsic | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Grant Date | |
|
Life | |
|
Value | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
In Years | |
|
(000s) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning balance
|
|
|
1,178,473 |
|
|
$ |
19.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
106,956 |
|
|
|
17.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outstanding
|
|
|
1,071,517 |
|
|
|
19.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
55,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable and vested
|
|
|
818,384 |
|
|
|
19.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
43,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three
months ended October 31, 2006 and 2005 was
$4.9 million and $7.6 million, respectively. Cash
received from option exercises under all share-based payment
arrangements for the three months ended October 31, 2006
was $2.7 million. The tax benefit realized for the tax
deductions resulting from option exercises of share-based
payment arrangements was $5.3 million for the three months
ended October 31, 2006.
Performance shares
During October 2005, certain participants were awarded rights to
receive restricted shares of the company in October 2006.
Restricted shares were earned and granted in October 2006. The
number of shares was based upon established performance targets
that were assessed at the end of fiscal year 2006. The vesting
of the issued restricted shares will be two years after the
performance targets were assessed and therefore the service
period is from the date of grant through July 31, 2008.
These shares were valued initially at $31.94 per share for a
total value of $2.5 million based upon the market price of
the shares at the award date and the expected outcome of the
performance targets. Based on the results for the year ended
July 31, 2006 and that the fiscal 2006 performance targets
were exceeded, we accrued additional share based compensation
related to the performance shares. During the first fiscal
quarter of 2007, 70,113 shares of restricted stock were issued
related to the performance shares valued at $4.6 million.
We recorded $1.3 million and $0.4 million of
compensation expense related to this plan in the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2006 and in the first fiscal quarter of
2007, respectively. We expect to record an additional
$2.6 million over the remaining service period. As a fixed
amount of restricted shares have now been issued, this
compensation plan is no longer recorded as a liability, but is
now included as additional paid in capital.
F-139
Restricted Stock
For the restricted shares, the shares generally vest ratably
over 3 years, except for those related to the performance
shares discussed above. The status of the restricted stock as of
July 31, 2006 and the changes during the three months ended
October 31, 2006 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
Nonvested at July 31, 2006
|
|
|
124,969 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
70,113 |
|
|
Less: Vested
|
|
|
34,782 |
|
|
Less: Forfeited
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at October 31, 2006
|
|
|
159,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value for the granted
restricted stock was $65.00 and $31.94 per share for the three
months ended October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. All
of the restricted stock granted in the first quarter of fiscal
2007 related to the performance shares discussed above. The
total fair value of shares vested during the three months ended
October 31, 2006 and 2005 was $2.3 million and
$0.2 million, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We also have an employee stock purchase plan. The Board of
Directors originally authorized 1,000,000 shares available for
issuance under this plan. Participation is voluntary and
substantially all full-time employees meeting limited
eligibility requirements may participate. Contributions are made
through payroll deductions and may not be less than 1% or more
than 15% of the participants base pay as defined. The
participants option to purchase common stock is deemed to
be granted on the first day and exercised on the last day of the
fiscal quarter at a price that is the lower of 85% of the market
price on the first or last day of the fiscal quarter. In
connection with the pending merger with CGG, we agreed to limit
the number of shares to be issued after the merger agreement
signing on September 4, 2006. In order to comply with the
merger agreement, Veritas discontinued the ESPP on
October 31, 2006. During the quarter ended October 31,
2006, 17,807 shares of common stock with a weighted fair value
at grant of $12.07 per share were issued related to the
preceding quarters grant. During the quarter ended
October 31, 2006, there were 18,026 shares granted and all
of these will be issued in the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
The grant date fair value for these shares was $13.15 per share.
During the quarter ended October 31, 2005, 24,317 shares of
common stock with a weighted fair value at grant of $22.42 per
share were issued related to the preceding fiscal quarters
grant. During the quarter ended October 31, 2005, there
were 23,144 shares granted and all of these were issued in the
second quarter of fiscal 2006 with a grant date fair value of
$7.52 per share. The fair value for the shares granted was
determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation method with
the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used in valuation model | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Risk free | |
|
|
|
Expected | |
|
Expected | |
For the quarter ended |
|
rate | |
|
Volatility | |
|
life | |
|
dividends | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
October 31, 2005
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2006
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
11. Guarantor financial information
In connection with the merger with CGG, as described above in
Note 2, certain of Veritas subsidiaries will guarantee
obligations on a joint and several, full and unconditional basis
related to debt securities offered by CGG. Each subsidiary
guarantor is owned 100% by the Company. The following tables
present parent guarantor, subsidiary guarantors and combined
non-guarantors condensed consolidating balance sheets of the
Company and its subsidiaries at October 31, 2006 and
July 31, 2006 and the condensed consolidating results of
operations and cash flows for the three months ended
October 31, 2006 and October 31, 2005. The information
classifies the Companys subsidiaries into Veritas DGC Inc.
(parent company guarantor), the subsidiary guarantors, and the
F-140
combined non-guarantors based upon the classification of those
subsidiaries under the terms of the debt securities offered by
CGG.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three months ended October 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
112,516 |
|
|
$ |
119,926 |
|
|
$ |
(1,611 |
) |
|
$ |
230,831 |
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,881 |
|
|
|
95,736 |
|
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
|
|
171,196 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
20,455 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(894 |
) |
|
|
15,180 |
|
|
|
23,848 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
37,944 |
|
Interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(6,808 |
) |
|
|
5,213 |
|
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,795 |
) |
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(23,529 |
) |
|
|
(13,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
29,443 |
|
|
|
23,577 |
|
|
|
25,214 |
|
|
|
(37,524 |
) |
|
|
40,710 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
8,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
27,528 |
|
|
$ |
20,396 |
|
|
$ |
17,128 |
|
|
$ |
(37,524 |
) |
|
$ |
27,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three months ended October 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,918 |
|
|
$ |
86,931 |
|
|
$ |
(1,171 |
) |
|
$ |
168,678 |
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,336 |
|
|
|
74,403 |
|
|
|
(1,171 |
) |
|
|
141,568 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
7,876 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
6,706 |
|
|
|
12,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,255 |
|
Interest (income) expense
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
(1,533 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
Equity in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(12,901 |
) |
|
|
(4,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
10,934 |
|
|
|
15,496 |
|
|
|
12,093 |
|
|
|
(17,717 |
) |
|
|
20,806 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
4,680 |
|
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
11,787 |
|
|
$ |
10,816 |
|
|
$ |
6,901 |
|
|
$ |
(17,717 |
) |
|
$ |
11,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-141
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
October 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
2,981 |
|
|
$ |
228,931 |
|
|
$ |
121,907 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
353,819 |
|
|
Restricted cash investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
16,581 |
|
|
|
126,265 |
|
|
|
95,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,430 |
|
|
Materials and supplies inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,313 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,451 |
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
21,550 |
|
|
|
14,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,386 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
6,802 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
27,592 |
|
|
|
383,141 |
|
|
|
234,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,614 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358,829 |
|
|
|
187,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546,225 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255,863 |
) |
|
|
(148,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,966 |
|
|
|
38,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,883 |
|
Multi-client data library
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,883 |
|
|
|
194,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324,069 |
|
Intercompany receivable
|
|
|
617,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(617,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
227,385 |
|
|
|
149,394 |
|
|
|
76,962 |
|
|
|
(453,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
35,552 |
|
|
|
15,939 |
|
|
|
12,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
908,464 |
|
|
$ |
781,323 |
|
|
$ |
557,503 |
|
|
$ |
(1,071,676 |
) |
|
$ |
1,175,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
Accounts payable, trade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,909 |
|
|
|
54,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,545 |
|
|
Accrued and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(2,200 |
) |
|
|
4,488 |
|
|
|
32,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,131 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,773 |
|
|
|
20,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,581 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
31,834 |
|
|
|
24,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
154,625 |
|
|
|
104,004 |
|
|
|
132,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,513 |
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,483 |
|
|
|
147,452 |
|
|
|
(617,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
4,006 |
|
|
|
8,100 |
|
|
|
22,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
4,006 |
|
|
|
478,583 |
|
|
|
169,614 |
|
|
|
(617,935 |
) |
|
|
34,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
3,132 |
|
|
|
26,937 |
|
|
|
(30,069 |
) |
|
|
374 |
|
Other stockholders equity
|
|
|
749,459 |
|
|
|
195,604 |
|
|
|
228,068 |
|
|
|
(423,672 |
) |
|
|
749,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
749,833 |
|
|
|
198,736 |
|
|
|
255,005 |
|
|
|
(453,741 |
) |
|
|
749,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
908,464 |
|
|
$ |
781,323 |
|
|
$ |
557,503 |
|
|
$ |
(1,071,676 |
) |
|
$ |
1,175,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-142
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
5,418 |
|
|
$ |
295,634 |
|
|
$ |
100,903 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
401,955 |
|
|
Restricted cash investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
9,873 |
|
|
|
97,292 |
|
|
|
108,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,244 |
|
|
Materials and supplies inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,899 |
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,366 |
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
14,342 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,917 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
14,616 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
(8,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
Current assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
31,352 |
|
|
|
415,777 |
|
|
|
209,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656,157 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,866 |
|
|
|
68,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359,683 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201,357 |
) |
|
|
(47,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,509 |
|
|
|
21,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,604 |
|
Multi-client library
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,876 |
|
|
|
166,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,603 |
|
Intercompany receivable
|
|
|
616,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(616,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
190,083 |
|
|
|
149,394 |
|
|
|
76,443 |
|
|
|
(415,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
34,433 |
|
|
|
14,762 |
|
|
|
15,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,210 |
|
Noncurrent assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,598 |
|
|
|
21,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
871,894 |
|
|
$ |
807,916 |
|
|
$ |
510,166 |
|
|
$ |
(1,031,946 |
) |
|
$ |
1,158,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
Accounts payable, trade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,508 |
|
|
|
53,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,863 |
|
|
Accrued and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
3,177 |
|
|
|
24,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,224 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
24,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,280 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
41,711 |
|
|
|
27,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,313 |
|
|
Current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,124 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
157,799 |
|
|
|
124,136 |
|
|
|
130,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,925 |
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,913 |
|
|
|
118,113 |
|
|
|
(616,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
9,386 |
|
|
|
21,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
507,299 |
|
|
|
139,737 |
|
|
|
(616,026 |
) |
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
3,132 |
|
|
|
26,936 |
|
|
|
(30,068 |
) |
|
|
372 |
|
Other stockholders equity
|
|
|
710,172 |
|
|
|
173,349 |
|
|
|
212,503 |
|
|
|
(385,852 |
) |
|
|
710,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
710,544 |
|
|
|
176,481 |
|
|
|
239,439 |
|
|
|
(415,920 |
) |
|
|
710,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
871,894 |
|
|
$ |
807,916 |
|
|
$ |
510,166 |
|
|
$ |
(1,031,946 |
) |
|
$ |
1,158,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-143
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three months ended October 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
Cash flows from (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
(10,759 |
) |
|
$ |
(46,059 |
) |
|
$ |
99,494 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42,676 |
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,644 |
) |
|
|
(78,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,044 |
) |
Financing activities
|
|
|
8,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
(2,437 |
) |
|
|
(66,703 |
) |
|
|
20,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,490 |
) |
Currency gain on foreign cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(2,437 |
) |
|
|
(66,703 |
) |
|
|
21,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,136 |
) |
Beginning cash balance
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
295,634 |
|
|
|
100,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash balance
|
|
$ |
2,981 |
|
|
$ |
228,931 |
|
|
$ |
121,907 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
353,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three months ended October 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
Cash flows from (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
48,168 |
|
|
$ |
(54,999 |
) |
|
$ |
36,228 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,397 |
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,479 |
) |
|
|
(53,956 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,435 |
) |
Financing activities
|
|
|
7,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
55,461 |
|
|
|
(60,478 |
) |
|
|
(18,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,116 |
) |
Currency gain on foreign cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
55,461 |
|
|
|
(60,478 |
) |
|
|
(16,405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,422 |
) |
Beginning cash balance
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
177,824 |
|
|
|
68,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash balance
|
|
$ |
58,438 |
|
|
$ |
117,346 |
|
|
$ |
52,187 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
227,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-144
VERITAS DGC INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JULY 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
F-145
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Veritas DGC Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Veritas DGC Inc. and its subsidiaries at
July 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended July 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Houston, Texas
October 4, 2006, except as to Note 16, which is as of
January 26, 2007
F-146
VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share | |
|
|
amounts) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
822,188 |
|
|
$ |
634,026 |
|
|
$ |
564,469 |
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
623,159 |
|
|
|
519,008 |
|
|
|
495,709 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
22,910 |
|
|
|
18,882 |
|
|
|
15,536 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
43,240 |
|
|
|
31,895 |
|
|
|
25,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
132,879 |
|
|
|
64,241 |
|
|
|
27,770 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,319 |
|
|
|
3,996 |
|
|
|
18,851 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(11,989 |
) |
|
|
(5,262 |
) |
|
|
(1,602 |
) |
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
139,426 |
|
|
|
76,243 |
|
|
|
8,936 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
57,195 |
|
|
|
(6,758 |
) |
|
|
3,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
82,231 |
|
|
$ |
83,001 |
|
|
$ |
5,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
35,260 |
|
|
|
33,843 |
|
|
|
33,572 |
|
|
Income per common share
|
|
$ |
2.33 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
39,623 |
|
|
|
35,054 |
|
|
|
34,260 |
|
|
Income per common share
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
82,231 |
|
|
$ |
83,001 |
|
|
$ |
5,221 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax, $0 in all periods
except as specified):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
7,538 |
|
|
|
6,914 |
|
|
|
3,835 |
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments-available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
Reclassification of unrealized gain on investments recognized in
income
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on hedge transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of tax benefit of
$409, $3,074 and $0 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively)
|
|
|
(956 |
) |
|
|
(7,171 |
) |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
6,385 |
|
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
88,616 |
|
|
$ |
82,585 |
|
|
$ |
8,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-147
VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, | |
|
|
except par value) | |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
401,955 |
|
|
$ |
249,393 |
|
|
Restricted cash investments
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts:
$1,895 in 2006 and $1,322 in 2005)
|
|
|
215,244 |
|
|
|
165,989 |
|
|
Materials and supplies inventory
|
|
|
6,366 |
|
|
|
5,381 |
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
18,917 |
|
|
|
18,900 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
|
12,486 |
|
|
Current assets held for sale
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
656,157 |
|
|
|
452,386 |
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
Geophysical equipment
|
|
|
200,297 |
|
|
|
329,436 |
|
|
Data processing equipment
|
|
|
79,590 |
|
|
|
75,337 |
|
|
Geophysical vessel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,331 |
|
|
Leasehold improvements and other
|
|
|
76,941 |
|
|
|
74,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
359,683 |
|
|
|
495,090 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
249,079 |
|
|
|
367,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
110,604 |
|
|
|
127,917 |
|
Multi-client data library
|
|
|
296,603 |
|
|
|
316,793 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
41,511 |
|
|
|
45,963 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
22,699 |
|
|
|
23,539 |
|
Noncurrent assets held for sale
|
|
|
30,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,158,030 |
|
|
$ |
966,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Accounts payable, trade
|
|
|
107,863 |
|
|
|
75,810 |
|
|
Accrued and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
29,224 |
|
|
|
9,402 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
29,280 |
|
|
|
42,043 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
70,313 |
|
|
|
65,193 |
|
|
Current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
412,925 |
|
|
|
192,448 |
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
36,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
191,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized: 78,500,000 shares;
issued: 37,220,959 shares in 2006 and 35,580,032 shares in 2005
(excluding Exchangeable Shares of 156,428 in 2005)
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
492,387 |
|
|
|
452,299 |
|
Accumulated earnings
|
|
|
228,376 |
|
|
|
146,145 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
21,783 |
|
|
|
14,245 |
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments-available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(9,367 |
) |
|
|
(8,410 |
) |
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(595 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,349,592 shares in 2006 and 1,320,106
shares in 2005
|
|
|
(23,007 |
) |
|
|
(21,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
710,544 |
|
|
|
582,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,158,030 |
|
|
$ |
966,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-148
VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
82,231 |
|
|
$ |
83,001 |
|
|
$ |
5,221 |
|
|
Non-cash items included in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, net (other than multi-client)
|
|
|
43,920 |
|
|
|
41,583 |
|
|
|
40,300 |
|
|
|
Amortization of multi-client library
|
|
|
200,975 |
|
|
|
159,725 |
|
|
|
209,840 |
|
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
5,957 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
Equity in loss of joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
|
(39,280 |
) |
|
|
(9,678 |
) |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(62,288 |
) |
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
(34,452 |
) |
|
|
Materials and supplies inventory
|
|
|
(1,422 |
) |
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
(4,884 |
) |
|
|
(3,270 |
) |
|
|
(1,836 |
) |
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
23,037 |
|
|
|
12,136 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable, deferred revenue and other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
40,602 |
|
|
|
69,003 |
|
|
|
32,951 |
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
4,010 |
|
|
|
5,098 |
|
|
|
(1,844 |
) |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
(1,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
336,615 |
|
|
|
331,295 |
|
|
|
243,034 |
|
Cash flows used by investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in multi-client library, net cash
|
|
|
(165,634 |
) |
|
|
(148,373 |
) |
|
|
(126,250 |
) |
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(67,903 |
) |
|
|
(62,375 |
) |
|
|
(30,543 |
) |
|
|
Sale of
(RC)2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
Proceeds from involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
15,600 |
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash investments
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(216,842 |
) |
|
|
(206,715 |
) |
|
|
(152,392 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
Payments of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194,225 |
) |
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of common stock
|
|
|
27,744 |
|
|
|
7,652 |
|
|
|
12,543 |
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share based compensation
|
|
|
4,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(2,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used by) financing activities
|
|
|
29,998 |
|
|
|
7,652 |
|
|
|
(46,682 |
) |
|
Currency gain on foreign cash
|
|
|
2,791 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
152,562 |
|
|
|
133,094 |
|
|
|
44,202 |
|
|
Beginning cash and cash equivalents balance
|
|
|
249,393 |
|
|
|
116,299 |
|
|
|
72,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents balance
|
|
$ |
401,955 |
|
|
$ |
249,393 |
|
|
$ |
116,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-149
VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULES TO CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Schedule of significant non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization of depreciation and amortization resulting in an
increase in multi-client data library
|
|
|
13,275 |
|
|
|
11,365 |
|
|
|
18,648 |
|
|
Capital lease obligations incurred for the purchase of equipment
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for purchase of Fairweather Geophysical LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
$ |
5,301 |
|
|
$ |
2,286 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,830 |
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
Income taxes, net
|
|
|
34,840 |
|
|
|
21,809 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-150
VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
For the years ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Treasury Stock | |
|
|
|
Earnings from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Cost | |
|
Additional | |
|
August 1, 1991 | |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Par | |
|
| |
|
Paid-In- | |
|
with respect to | |
|
Unearned | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Shares | |
|
Cost | |
|
Capital | |
|
Digicon Inc. | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts) | |
Balance, July 31, 2003
|
|
|
32,156,781 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
|
(84,143 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,508 |
) |
|
$ |
428,402 |
|
|
$ |
57,923 |
|
|
$ |
(340 |
) |
|
$ |
2,718 |
|
Common stock issued for exchangeable stock
|
|
|
1,257,490 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued to employees
|
|
|
56,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for cash
|
|
|
1,289,098 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock returned to treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,895 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock buy back
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,222,494 |
) |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit for share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock exchanged for purchase of Fairweather
|
|
|
61,576 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,835 |
|
Amortization of unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments available
for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(588 |
) |
Unrealized loss on foreign currency hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(632 |
) |
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777 |
|
Unrealized minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2004
|
|
|
34,821,298 |
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
|
(1,317,532 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,628 |
) |
|
$ |
441,982 |
|
|
$ |
63,144 |
|
|
$ |
(604 |
) |
|
$ |
6,448 |
|
Common stock issued for exchangeable stock
|
|
|
25,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued to employees
|
|
|
733,250 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock returned to treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,574 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit for share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,914 |
|
Amortization of unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments available
for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
Unrealized minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,171 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2005
|
|
|
35,580,032 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
|
(1,320,106 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,688 |
) |
|
$ |
452,299 |
|
|
$ |
146,145 |
|
|
$ |
(595 |
) |
|
$ |
6,032 |
|
Common stock issued for exchangeable stock
|
|
|
156,428 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued to employees
|
|
|
1,484,499 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock returned to treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,486 |
) |
|
|
(1,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit for share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,538 |
|
Share based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
Unrealized minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(956 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2006
|
|
|
37,220,959 |
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
|
(1,349,592 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,007 |
) |
|
$ |
492,387 |
|
|
$ |
228,376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-151
VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and the accounts of
majority-owned domestic
and foreign subsidiaries as well as those variable interest
entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. All material
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
Our financial instruments include cash and
short-term investments,
restricted cash investments, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and debt. The approximate fair market value of our
variable rate debt at July 31, 2006 is $383 million.
The carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value for
all other financial instruments.
Translation of Foreign
Currencies
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency of all of our
operations except in Canada, which uses the Canadian dollar as
its functional currency. Currency gains and losses result from
the re-measurement of
assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than
their functional currency and are included in Other
(Income) Expense, Net.
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, we define cash equivalents as items
readily convertible into known amounts of cash with original
maturities of three months or less.
Restricted Cash
Investments
Restricted cash investments in the amounts of $302,000 at
July 31, 2006 and $237,000 at July 31, 2005 were
pledged as collateral on certain bank guarantees related to
contracts entered into in the normal course of business and are
classified as restricted cash investments on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Accounts Receivable
Unbilled amounts of $62.0 million at July 31, 2006 and
$57.4 million at July 31, 2005 were included in
accounts receivable. These amounts represent work performed or
services or products delivered to customers but not billable at
the fiscal year ends in accordance with contract provisions and
generally are expected to be billed in one to four months.
Our allowance for doubtful accounts is established based upon
past due customer accounts specifically identified during our
periodic account analyses.
F-152
Inventories
Inventories of materials and supplies are stated at the lower of
average cost or market.
Property and
Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method based on estimated
useful lives as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Useful Life | |
|
|
In Years | |
|
|
| |
Geophysical equipment
|
|
|
3-5 |
|
Data processing equipment
|
|
|
3 |
|
Leasehold improvements and other
|
|
|
3-15 |
|
Depreciation related to assets used in the production of the
multi-client library and development of certain software is
capitalized. Amounts capitalized were $13.3 million,
$11.4 million and $18.6 million in fiscal years 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
Expenditures for routine repairs and maintenance are charged to
expense as incurred. We are contractually obligated to
periodically put our chartered vessels into port so that the
vessel owner can perform legally required maintenance and
inspections. The ship owner is responsible for all costs of
performing the maintenance and inspections, while we continue to
incur all of the fixed charges associated with operation of the
vessel including charter fees, depreciation and personnel costs.
We accrue for these continuing costs in advance of port calls,
as these unavoidable costs are not directly associated with
revenue generation. The balances of such accruals were
$6.0 million and $3.2 million at July 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively. Expenditures for additions and
improvements, including capitalized interest, are capitalized
and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related
assets.
Multi-Client Data
Library
We collect and process geophysical data for our own account and
retain ownership rights. We license the data to customers on a
non-transferable basis.
In some circumstances, we have sold, on a
non-exclusive basis,
rights to data prior to our collecting and processing such data,
i.e., we have made the first of what we anticipate will be
multiple discrete sales of licenses to the same data. We
capitalize all costs directly associated with acquiring and
processing the data, including the depreciation of the assets
used in production of the surveys. We refer to these costs as
our gross multi-client
investment. All costs, excluding the capitalized depreciation,
are our net
multi-client
investment, or as used in this document investment in
multi-client library,
net cash, and represent cash investment in the library.
The capitalized cost of
multi-client data is
charged to cost of services in the period sales occur based on
the greater of the percentage of total estimated costs to total
estimated sales in the first five years multiplied by actual
sales, known as the sales forecast method, or the
straight-line
amortization method over five years. The sales forecast method
is our primary method of calculating cost of services. In
addition to the sales forecast method, through July 31,
2003, any costs that remained 36 months after completion of
a multi-client survey
were charged on a straight-line basis to cost of services over a
period not to exceed the next 24 months. This minimum
straight-line
amortization was recorded only if minimum amortization exceeded
the cost of services calculated using the sales forecast method.
Effective August 1, 2003, we changed our multi-client
policy to commence the minimum amortization from the date of
survey completion, instead of only during the last
24 months of survey book life.
We periodically review the carrying value of the
multi-client data
library to assess whether there has been a permanent impairment
of value and record losses when it is determined that estimated
future sales would not be sufficient to cover the carrying value
of the asset. In fiscal 2003, we recognized a
$4.9 million pretax impairment charge related to a survey
in the Gulf of Mexico that we have been unable to license. This
survey was acquired at
F-153
right angles to an existing survey and, while a technical
success, customers have not been willing to pay for the
increased resolution.
Multi-Client Data
Library Change in Estimate Effected by a Change in
Accounting Principle
Effective August 1, 2003, we changed our minimum
amortization policy with regard to
multi-client data and
recorded a charge of $22.1 million, included in cost of
services in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Under the
prior method, capitalized costs of
multi-client surveys
were charged to cost of services in the period sales occurred,
using the sales forecast method, over an estimated
five-year useful life.
However, during the last 24 months of a surveys
useful life, amortization was the greater of the amount
resulting from the sales forecast method or
straight-line
amortization of the remaining book value over the remaining
portion of the original
five-year estimated
useful life. Under the new method, capitalized costs of
multi-client surveys
are charged to cost of services over an estimated
five-year useful life
based upon the greater (higher expense) of the result under the
sales forecast method or cumulative
straight-line
amortization from survey completion over an estimated
five-year useful life.
Notwithstanding this change, the sales forecast method remains
our primary method of calculating cost of services. The total
amortization period that concludes sixty months after survey
completion represents the minimum period over which the surveys
are expected to provide economic benefits. We believe that
commencing the minimum amortization upon survey completion, as
opposed to our prior method of doing so only during the last
twenty-four months of
the surveys life, better reflects the potential decrease
of survey value with the passage of time.
Revenue
Customer contracts for our services vary in terms and
conditions. We review the deliverables in each contract and,
where applicable, apply the accounting guidance contained in
EITF 00-21.
Revenue from contract services is recognized in accordance with
the terms of the contract. For fixed price contracts, the
proportional performance method is used based upon output
measures. Revenue is measured by the amount of data collected or
processed compared to the total amount of data to be collected
or processed. For day rate contracts, revenue is recognized
based on time incurred. In contracts where our customer pays
separately for the mobilization of equipment, we recognize such
mobilization fees as revenue during the performance of the
seismic acquisition, using the same proportional performance
method as for the acquisition work.
Revenue from the licensing of
multi-client surveys is
based upon agreed rates set forth in the contract and are
recognized upon delivery of such data. We have no additional
obligations to the customer subsequent to delivery. Revenue
generated from licensing of
in-process
multi-client surveys is
recognized after obtaining a signed license agreement that gives
the customers access to survey results as they occur based upon
a proportional performance method, using quantifiable measures
of progress, such as kilometers shot or processed, similar to
the method for contract services. For partially completed
projects, contract customers and customers who enter license
agreements on
multi-client surveys
generally have access to the data as it is being collected.
There are no provisions for updates or enhancements in any of
our survey licenses. In accordance with our license terms, the
customer generally does not have the right to return the data
for refund. Infrequently we enter into contracts where revenue
recognition is affected by certain contingencies. In some
contracts, the ultimate price paid by the customer may not be
fixed or determinable due to revenue sharing clauses. In these
projects, we recognize revenue from those customers only to the
extent that the net price of the data to them is, or has become,
fixed. We also enter into contracts where the customer has a
right of return based upon date contingencies. In these
projects, we do not apply the proportional performance method
and, instead, we recognize revenue only after the date
contingency is resolved.
Leases
Our operating leases include those for office space, specialized
geophysical equipment, computer equipment and our geophysical
vessels, which are chartered on a
short-term basis, of up
to 8 years, relative to their useful economic lives of
30 years.
F-154
Mobilization Costs
Transportation and other expenses incurred prior to commencement
of geophysical operations in an area are deferred and amortized
over the term of the related contract. Unamortized mobilization
costs of $5.2 million and $4.2 million were included
in other current assets at July 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Amounts applicable to surveys performed for our
own account are included in the cost of the
multi-client data
library.
Research and
Development
Costs related to the research and development, primarily
salaries and benefits of employees, are charged to research and
development expenses as incurred.
Share Based
Compensation
As of August 1, 2005, we adopted the Financial Accounting
Standard Board Statement No. 123(R) (SFAS 123R) to
account for share based compensation. SFAS 123R requires us
to record the cost of stock options and other equity-based
compensation in our income statement based upon the estimated
fair value of those awards. We elected to use the modified
prospective method for adoption, which requires compensation
expense to be recorded for all unvested stock options and other
equity-based compensation beginning in the first quarter of
adoption. Accordingly, prior periods have not been restated to
reflect share based compensation. For all unvested options
outstanding as of August 1, 2005, the previously measured
but unrecognized compensation expense, based on the fair value
at the original grant date, we began recognizing in the
statement of operations over the remaining vesting period. For
equity-based compensation granted subsequent to August 1,
2005, compensation expense, based on the fair value on the date
of grant, we began recognizing in the statement of operations
over the vesting period. For deferred share units, it is our
policy to determine the fair value of the units based on our
common stock price at the date of grant which is then expensed
over the applicable service period.
Prior to August 1, 2005, we accounted for equity-based
compensation using the intrinsic method prescribed in Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. Under
that method, compensation expense is recorded in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements when the quoted
market price of the underlying stock at the grant date or other
measurement date exceeds the amount an employee must pay to
acquire the stock. Our plans do not permit us to grant stock
options at a price lower than market, therefore, we did not
record any compensation expense related to stock options. As
required by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, we disclose the pro forma effect
of stock-based compensation expense on net income and earnings
per share that would have been recorded had we used the fair
value based method.
We have disclosed below the effect on net income and earnings
per share of equity-based compensation, including stock options,
that would have been recorded using the fair value based method
for years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net income as reported
|
|
$ |
83,001 |
|
|
$ |
5,221 |
|
Add: Compensation expense, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Less: Total share based compensation expense determined under
fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
(2,541 |
) |
|
|
(4,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
80,688 |
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
|
Pro-forma
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
|
|
Pro-forma
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
.02 |
|
F-155
The weighted average grant date fair values of options granted
during fiscal 2005 and 2004 were $10.81 and $6.32, respectively.
These values were determined using the Black-Scholes option
valuation method assuming no expected dividends. Other
assumptions used are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.7% |
|
|
|
3.7% |
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
46.8% |
|
|
|
64.9% |
|
Expected life in years
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Earnings Per Share
The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the
weighted average common shares outstanding, including
exchangeable shares. The computation of diluted earnings per
share is based upon the weighted average common shares
outstanding and additional common shares, utilizing the treasury
stock method and average market prices, which would have been
outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued.
Potentially dilutive securities include stock options and
restricted stock issued to our employees and directors and our
Convertible Senior Notes.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 109-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production
Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004, which provides guidance on the recently enacted
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act). The
Act provides a U.S. tax deduction for income from qualified
domestic production activities beginning in our fiscal year
ended July 31, 2006. FSP 109-1 provides for the
treatment of the deduction as a special deduction as described
in SFAS No. 109. Accordingly, we will record the
amount of any special deductions in the years they are taken.
The impact of this deduction did not have a material impact on
our fiscal year 2006 financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 109-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign
Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004, which provides guidance under SFAS No. 109
with respect to recording the potential impact of the
repatriation provisions of the Act on a companys income
tax expense and deferred tax liability. FSP 109-2 states
that a company is allowed time beyond the financial reporting
period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Act on its
plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for
purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. During July 2006,
the Company elected to repatriate $55 million from one of
its foreign subsidiaries to realize the benefits of this
provision of the Act. We plan to use the net proceeds for
qualifying U.S. expenditures. The impact of the repatriation was
$2.5 million increase to the fiscal 2006 tax provision.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets an amendment
of APB Opinion No. 29, to address the measurement of
exchanges of nonmonetary assets. SFAS No. 153
eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for
nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces
it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets
that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange
has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity
are expected to change significantly as a result of the
exchange. This statement was adopted by the company beginning
August 1, 2005. The adoption of this statement had no
impact on the companys financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement
No. 3. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective
application to prior periods financial statements for
changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to
determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative
effect of the change. SFAS 154 also requires that a change
in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for
long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in
accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting
principle. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The
F-156
implementation of SFAS No. 154 is not expected to have
a material impact on the companys financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 133 and 150. SFAS No. 155
(a) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid
financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that
otherwise would require bifurcation, (b) clarifies that
certain instruments are not subject to the requirements of
SFAS 133, (c) establishes a requirement to evaluate
interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests
that may contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation,
(d) clarifies what may be an embedded derivative for
certain concentrations of credit risk and (e) amends
SFAS 140 to eliminate certain prohibitions related to
derivatives on a qualifying special-purpose entity.
SFAS 155 is effective for us for the fiscal year beginning
August 1, 2007. The implementation of
SFAS No. 155 is not expected to have a material impact
on the companys financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation
(FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. FIN No. 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
FIN No. 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. The new standard also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods and disclosure. The provisions of
FIN No. 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the
provisions of FIN No. 48 to determine the impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. AUG AIR-1, Accounting for Planned Major
Maintenance Activities. This guidance prohibits the use of
the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for planned major
activities because an obligation has not occurred and therefore
a liability should not be recognized. The provisions of this
guidance will be effective for us for the fiscal year beginning
August 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating the provisions
of this guidance to determine the impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). SFAS No. 158
requires an employer to: (a) Recognize in its statement of
financial position an asset for a plans overfunded status
or a liability for a plans underfunded status;
(b) Measure a plans assets and its obligations that
determine its funded status as of the end of the employers
fiscal year (with limited exceptions); (c) Recognize
changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement
plan in the year in which the changes occur. Those changes will
be reported in comprehensive income of a business entity and in
changes in net assets of a not-for-profit organization. The
requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and
the disclosure requirements are effective for us for the fiscal
year ending on July 31, 2007. The requirement to measure
plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of our fiscal
year-end balance sheet is effective for us for the fiscal year
ending July 31, 2009. We are currently evaluating the
provisions of this guidance to determine the impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
2. Other assets
Software
For internally developed software designed for external
licensing, we capitalize costs associated with the development
of the product from the time the product reaches technological
feasibility until it is ready for commercial release. Software
available for sale is included in other assets on our
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The capitalized cost of the software, whether developed or
purchased, is charged to cost of services in the period sales
occur based on the percentage of total cost to total estimated
sales multiplied by actual sales during the period. The software
is also subject to a minimum amortization equal to the
unamortized balance at the beginning of the period divided by
the remaining book life. Estimated useful lives of our software
products range
F-157
from three to five years. Amortization expense for our software
was $3.6 million, $3.3 million and $3.1 million
for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Debt Issuance Costs
We capitalize costs incurred during the process of obtaining
debt financing, including commissions, legal fees, and filing
fees. We amortize these costs over the life of the related debt
instrument. In the case of our Convertible Senior Notes, which
have a life of 20 years, we are amortizing the debt
issuance costs over the
5-year period from the
Convertible Senior Notes issuance to the first date the
Convertible Senior Notes are redeemable, absent certain
specified conditions. The amortization of debt issuance cost,
recorded in interest expense, was $1.3 million,
$1.2 million and $7.1 million for fiscal 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively. The debt issuance cost amortization in
fiscal 2004 resulted primarily from the retirement of our
Term Debt and the expensing of all related issuance costs.
The carrying value of our software and debt issuance costs is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2006 | |
|
July 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Net | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Software
|
|
$ |
16,861 |
|
|
$ |
13,200 |
|
|
$ |
3,661 |
|
|
$ |
16,396 |
|
|
$ |
9,610 |
|
|
$ |
6,786 |
|
Debt Issuance Costs
|
|
|
6,759 |
|
|
|
2,876 |
|
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
5,821 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
4,224 |
|
3. Notes payable and debt structure
As of July 31, 2006, our notes payable consisted of
$155.0 million of Convertible Senior Notes due 2024. These
notes are classified as a current liability as of July 31,
2006 because the conversion feature discussed below results in
the notes being convertible at the option of the holders.
The Convertible Senior Notes bear interest at a per annum rate
which equals the
three-month LIBOR rate,
adjusted quarterly, minus a spread of 0.75%. The interest rate
of the notes, from June 15, 2006 through September 14,
2006, is 4.58%, based on a LIBOR rate of 5.33%. For
fiscal 2006, the weighted average interest rate on the
notes was 3.66%. The notes will mature on March 15, 2024
and may not be redeemed by us prior to March 20, 2009.
Holders of the notes may require us to repurchase some, or all,
of the notes on March 15, 2009, 2014 and 2019. They could
also require repurchase upon a change of control (as defined in
the indenture under which the Convertible Senior Notes were
issued).
Under certain circumstances and at the option of the holder, the
Convertible Senior Notes are convertible prior to the maturity
date into cash and shares of our common stock. Certain of these
circumstances may result in classification of the Convertible
Senior Notes as current on our balance sheet. These
circumstances include:
|
|
|
|
1. |
the closing sale price of our common stock is over 120% of the
conversion price, which is currently $24.03 (with 120% being
$28.84) for 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive
trading days ending on the last trading day of the fiscal
quarter preceding the quarter in which the conversion occurs; |
|
|
2. |
if we called the notes for redemption and the redemption has not
occurred; |
|
|
3. |
the occurrence of a five consecutive trading day period in which
the trading price of the notes was less than 95% of the closing
sale price of our common stock on such day multiplied by the
conversion ratio; or |
|
|
4. |
the occurrence of specified corporate transactions. |
Should any of these circumstances occur, the Convertible Senior
Notes would be convertible at the then current stock price times
the conversion ratio of 41.6146. This amount would be payable in
cash equal to the principal amount of the notes, the par value
adjusted for dividends or other equity transactions, and the
additional amount payable in shares of our common stock.
Currently, the maximum amount payable by us on conversion is
$155 million in cash plus 6.5 million shares. This
settlement method is prescribed in the indenture and is not at
F-158
the discretion of any party. The shares issuable from such
conversion are considered in the calculation of diluted earnings
per share.
As of the beginning of the second fiscal quarter of 2006, the
Convertible Senior Notes were convertible as the stock price
remained greater than 120% of the Conversion Price for at least
20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days
ending on October 31, 2005. The notes continued to be
convertible as of July 31, 2006. Because of the
convertibility, the notes have been classified as a current
liability on our consolidated balance sheet as of July 31,
2006. The determination of the convertibility of the notes
occurs quarterly. Depending upon the common stock price in the
future, the notes may not be convertible in future quarters and
therefore would not be classified as current on our consolidated
balance sheet. Assuming a stock price of $57.27 (which was the
closing stock price on July 31, 2006), conversion of all
the notes would result in our payment of $155 million in
cash and 3.7 million shares of common stock.
In connection with our issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes,
we entered into a registration rights agreement pursuant to
which we agreed to register the resale of the notes and
underlying common stock by the holders thereof. Under the terms
of that registration rights agreement, we were required to file
a shelf registration statement for the notes and underlying
common stock within an agreed amount of time and thereafter to
keep it current or useable for
two-year period ending
in March 2006. If we failed to file or keep the shelf
registration statement related to this debt effective or usable
in accordance with the registration rights agreement, then,
subject to certain exceptions, we were required to pay
liquidated damages to all holders of notes and all holders of
our common stock issued upon conversion of the notes. The
liquidated damages to be paid were equal to an annual rate of
0.50% of the principal amount. In November 2005, the shelf
registration statement became no longer effective and,
accordingly, we began accruing and paying liquidated damages at
$2,100 per day. For the fiscal year end 2006, we have recorded
and paid $310,000 of expense related to these liquidated
damages. We are not required to register the resale of the notes
and underlying common stock after March 10, 2006 and
therefore, our liability for the payment of liquidated damages
ended on that date.
In addition to the notes, we also have a five-year
$85 million revolving loan agreement with a syndicate of
banks. We entered into this facility in February 2006. The
facility provides for revolving loans and the issuance of
letters of credit to Veritas DGC Inc. and certain of its
subsidiaries of up to $45 million in the United States,
$15 million in Canada, $15 million in Singapore and
$10 million in the United Kingdom. As of July 31,
2006, there were no borrowings and $3.8 million of
outstanding letters of credit, leaving $81.2 million
available under the revolving loan facility. This new credit
facility replaced our previous credit facility that consisted
primarily of a revolving loan facility.
The facility is secured by pledges of accounts receivable and
the U.S. land data library, which, when added together, have a
carrying amount of $242 million as of July 31, 2006.
The facility is also secured by certain intercompany notes and
stock in certain Veritas subsidiaries. Veritas and certain of
its subsidiaries have also issued loan guarantees with respect
to certain borrowings. Interest rates on borrowings under the
facility are selected by the borrower at the time of any advance
and the rates so selected may be either at LIBOR plus 1.00% or
the Base Rate (defined as the lesser of the applicable prime
rate or the federal funds rate). These rates may be adjusted
upward depending upon our leverage ratio (calculated as a ratio
of funded debt versus EBITDA for the previous four quarters) to
a maximum of LIBOR plus 1.50% or the base rate plus 0.50%. The
loan agreement and related documents contain customary financial
covenants and default provisions, including a limit on the
amount of cash dividends. These covenants contain certain
financial measurements as of quarter ending dates, and, as of
our last fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2006, we were in
compliance with these covenants.
We also have various unsecured lines of credit, with lending
institutions that operate in geographic areas not covered by the
lending institutions in our credit facility, totaling
$8.5 million that may be used exclusively for the issuance
of letters of credit and bank guarantees. As of July 31,
2006, $1.0 million in letters of credit were outstanding
under these lines.
F-159
4. Other Accrued Liabilities
Other accrued liabilities include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
$ |
42,565 |
|
|
$ |
35,679 |
|
Accrued taxes other than income taxes
|
|
|
5,071 |
|
|
|
5,985 |
|
Accrued insurance
|
|
|
5,676 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
Accrued dry dock
|
|
|
6,043 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
Current capital lease obligation
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9,503 |
|
|
|
11,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
70,313 |
|
|
$ |
65,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Income Taxes
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income
taxes was earned in the following jurisdictions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
U.S.
|
|
$ |
55,028 |
|
|
$ |
46,224 |
|
|
$ |
4,192 |
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
84,398 |
|
|
|
30,019 |
|
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
139,426 |
|
|
$ |
76,243 |
|
|
$ |
8,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain income classified as non-U.S. is also subject to U.S.
income taxes. Provision (benefit) for income taxes consists
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Current U.S.
|
|
$ |
27,805 |
|
|
$ |
23,444 |
|
|
$ |
(3,293 |
) |
Deferred U.S.
|
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
(38,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Current Non-U.S.
|
|
|
25,845 |
|
|
|
9,078 |
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
Deferred Non-U.S.
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
57,195 |
|
|
$ |
(6,758 |
) |
|
$ |
3,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation between the provision (benefit) for income
taxes and the amount computed by applying the U.S. statutory
income tax rate to income (loss) before provision
(benefit) for income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Income tax provision (benefit) computed at the U.S.
statutory rate
|
|
$ |
48,799 |
|
|
$ |
26,685 |
|
|
$ |
3,128 |
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. activities
|
|
|
7,173 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
8,662 |
|
|
Adjustments to tax contingencies and resolution of certain tax
matters
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
(5,173 |
) |
|
Deduction of worthless stock of a subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,446 |
) |
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(3,369 |
) |
|
|
(1,671 |
) |
|
Valuation allowances on deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,417 |
) |
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
Non-deductibles
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
Software amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
57,195 |
|
|
$ |
(6,758 |
) |
|
$ |
3,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-160
The increase in taxes resulting from
non-U.S. activities
includes non-U.S.
earnings taxed at other than the U.S. statutory rate,
non-U.S. withholding
taxes, U.S. foreign tax credit or deductions, U.S. tax
on non-U.S. branch
operations or foreign dividends, foreign tax contingencies and
changes in valuation allowances on foreign deferred taxes.
Subsequent to July 31, 2004, we reached a settlement with
the Internal Revenue Service on the audit of certain prior year
tax returns. This settlement favorably impacted our 2004 income
tax provision.
Deferred income tax assets (liabilities) result from the
effect of transactions that are recognized in different periods
for financial and tax reporting purposes. The primary components
of our deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$ |
13,423 |
|
|
$ |
24,156 |
|
|
Multi-client data library
|
|
|
22,150 |
|
|
|
13,801 |
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
7,073 |
|
|
|
8,711 |
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
8,175 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
8,012 |
|
|
|
5,424 |
|
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
4,345 |
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
Capitalized costs
|
|
|
2,452 |
|
|
|
2,703 |
|
|
Equity based compensation
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
6,255 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
2,093 |
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(19,255 |
) |
|
|
(17,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets net
|
|
|
52,062 |
|
|
|
49,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnerships
|
|
|
(8,936 |
) |
|
|
(5,157 |
) |
|
Deferred charges
|
|
|
(2,691 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
Deferred mobilization
|
|
|
(1,069 |
) |
|
|
(1,278 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
(13,056 |
) |
|
|
(6,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
$ |
39,006 |
|
|
$ |
42,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A valuation allowance, by tax jurisdiction, is established when
it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the
deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The valuation
allowances are periodically adjusted based upon the available
evidence. Adjustments are also made to recognize the expiration
of NOL and tax credit carryforwards, with equal and offsetting
adjustments to the related deferred income tax asset. During
fiscal 2005, we concluded that certain valuation allowances were
no longer necessary as available evidence, including recent
profits and estimates of projected future taxable income,
supported a more likely than not conclusion that the related
deferred tax assets would be realized. As a result, the fiscal
2005 tax benefit included a non-cash benefit of
$36.9 million.
The following schedule sets forth the expiration dates of the
non-U.S. NOL carryforwards as of July 31, 2006. We had no
U.S. NOL carryforwards.
F-161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
|
Net | |
|
|
Operating | |
Fiscal Year |
|
Losses | |
|
|
| |
2007
|
|
$ |
853 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
2009
|
|
|
2,394 |
|
2010
|
|
|
411 |
|
2011
|
|
|
989 |
|
2012
|
|
|
906 |
|
2013
|
|
|
929 |
|
2014
|
|
|
378 |
|
2015
|
|
|
1,631 |
|
2016
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
33,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
44,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2004, we utilized $8.1 million of U.S. NOL
carryforwards, and during fiscal year 2005, we utilized
$3.9 million of U.S. NOL carryforwards.
Non-U.S. operations had
NOL carryforwards of $44.9 million at July 31, 2006,
of which $31.2 million are subject to valuation allowances.
Of the $44.9 million of
non-U.S. NOL
carryforwards, $21.8 million relate to Brazilian operations
and $6.8 million relate to Australian operations, all of
which have an indefinite carryforward period, and are available
to offset future income (subject to certain limitations).
We had foreign tax credit carryforwards of $7.8 million at
July 31, 2006, of which $7.7 million are subject to
valuation allowances (due principally to certain U.S.
limitations). Of the $7.8 million of foreign tax credit
carryforwards, $7.2 million relate to U.S. operations and
expire periodically through fiscal 2016.
Upon a change in control of the Company, certain limitations may
result in the utilization of NOL and foreign tax credit
carryforwards following the change in control.
We consider the undistributed earnings of our
non-U.S. subsidiaries
to be permanently reinvested. We have not provided deferred U.S.
income tax on those earnings, as it is not practicable to
estimate the amount of additional tax that might be payable
should these earnings be remitted or deemed remitted as
dividends or if we should sell our stock in the subsidiaries. On
October 22, 2004, the President signed the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (the Act). The Act creates a
temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate
accumulated income earned abroad by providing an 85 percent
dividends received deduction for certain dividends from
controlled foreign corporations. In connection with this
temporary incentive, we repatriated $55 million from one of
our foreign subsidiaries during July 2006. We plan to use the
net proceeds for qualifying U.S. expenditures. The impact of the
repatriation was $2.5 million increase to the fiscal 2006
tax provision.
On May 18, 2006, a new tax reform measure was signed into
law that substantially revises the Texas state franchise tax
beginning with our 2007 fiscal year. This new legislation, which
will be accounted for as an income tax in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, is not
expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
6. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Total rentals of vessels, equipment and office facilities
charged to operations amounted to $109.4 million,
$106.3 million and $83.2 million for the years ended
July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
F-162
Minimum rentals payable under operating leases, as of
July 31, 2006, principally for office space and vessel
charters with remaining
non-cancelable terms of
at least one year are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum | |
Fiscal Year |
|
Rentals | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2007
|
|
$ |
49,099 |
|
2008
|
|
|
34,349 |
|
2009
|
|
|
30,595 |
|
2010
|
|
|
27,468 |
|
2011
|
|
|
22,212 |
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
59,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
222,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
Data processing equipment at July 31, 2006 included
$3.7 million of capitalized leases. Future minimum lease
payments under non-cancelable capital leases as of July 31,
2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum | |
|
|
Rentals | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2007
|
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
2008
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$ |
1,767 |
|
Less: imputed interest costs
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minimum lease payments
|
|
$ |
1,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
We carry workers compensation insurance that limits our
liability on a per claim and per policy year basis. Management
has evaluated the adequacy of the accrual for the liability for
incurred but unreported workers compensation claims and has
determined that the ultimate resolution of any such claims would
not have a material adverse impact on our financial position. It
is possible that the actual liability for unreported workers
compensation claims could exceed the amounts already accrued. It
is not possible to reasonably estimate the range of possible
loss.
We issue purchase orders for the procurement of supplies and
certain services. As of July 31, 2006, we had
$86.6 million of purchase orders outstanding.
In March 2006, we entered into an agreement with a third party
ship owner to charter a vessel currently known as the Veritas
Vision, which is currently being converted for seismic
operations. The term of the charter is for a period of eight
years fixed, with options of up to 10 more years. When delivered
in the first calendar quarter of 2007, the Veritas Vision will
be the seventh seismic vessel in our fleet. In addition to the
charter, we expect to invest $62 million to equip the
vessel for seismic operations. Of this expected total,
$5 million was spent during the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2006 and the remainder is expected to be spent
during the fiscal year ending July 31, 2007.
In September 2006, we entered into an agreement to charter a
seismic vessel, currently known as the Viking Poseidon, which is
currently expected to be in service commencing in the second
calendar quarter of 2007. This vessel will serve as a
replacement for the Seisquest vessel, which is under a charter
that expires in May of 2007.
We have also entered into a commitment to purchase
$26 million of recording equipment to upgrade a vessel in
our existing fleet. Substantially all of this amount will be
spent during the fiscal year ending July 31, 2007.
7. Employee Benefits
Employee Retirement
Plans
We maintain a 401(k) plan in which employees of our
majority-owned domestic
subsidiaries and certain foreign subsidiaries are eligible to
participate. Employees of foreign subsidiaries who are covered
under a foreign
F-163
deferred compensation plan are not eligible. Employees are
permitted to make contributions of up to 50% of their salary up
to the statutory maximum dollar amount, which is $15,000 for
calendar 2006. We contribute an amount equal to the
employees contribution up to a maximum of 5% of the
employees salary or the statutory maximum. Our matching
contributions to the 401(k) plan were $2.4 million,
$2.1 million and $1.8 million for fiscal 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
We maintain a plan, the Canadian RRSP plan, in which employees,
primarily in our Canadian subsidiaries, are eligible to
participate. Employees are permitted to make contributions of up
to 10% of their salary and we contribute an amount equal to 50%
of the employees contribution up to a maximum of 5% of the
employees salary. An employee may contribute an additional
amount so that the total contribution to the employees
account equals up to 18% of the employees salary for the
prior year not to exceed $15,800 for calendar year 2006. Our
matching contributions to this plan were $1.0 million,
$0.8 million and $0.7 million for fiscal 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
Share Based Compensation
Plans
As of August 1, 2005, we adopted the Financial Accounting
Standard Board Statement No. 123(R) (SFAS 123(R)) to
account for share based compensation. SFAS 123(R) requires
us to record the cost of stock options and other
equity-based
compensation in our income statement based upon the estimated
fair value of those awards. We elected to use the modified
prospective method for adoption, which requires compensation
expense to be recorded for all unvested stock options and other
equity-based
compensation beginning in the first quarter of adoption.
Accordingly, prior periods have not been restated to reflect
share based compensation. For all unvested options outstanding
as of August 1, 2005, the previously measured but
unrecognized compensation expense, based on the fair value at
the original grant date, will be recognized in the statement of
operations over the remaining vesting period. For equity-based
compensation granted subsequent to August 1, 2005,
compensation expense, based on the fair value on the date of
grant, will be recognized in the statement of operations over
the vesting period. For deferred share units, it is our policy
to determine the fair value of the units based on our common
stock price at the date of grant which is then expensed over the
applicable service period.
Prior to December 11, 2002, we had two employee
nonqualified stock option plans under which options were granted
to officers and select employees. Options generally vested over
three years and were exercisable over a five to ten-year period
from the date of grant. The exercise price for each option was
the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. Our
Board of Directors authorized 5,954,550 shares of common stock
to be issued under these option plans.
Prior to December 11, 2002, we also maintained a stock
option plan for
non-employee directors
(the Director Plan) under which options were granted
to our non-employee directors. The Director Plan provided that
every year each eligible director was granted options to
purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock which vest over a
period of three years from the date of grant and are exercisable
over five to ten years from the date of grant. The exercise
price for each option granted was the fair market value at the
date of grant. The Board of Directors authorized
600,000 shares of common stock to be issued under the
Director Plan.
On December 11, 2002, we adopted our current Share
Incentive Plan that provides for the issuance to directors,
officers and select employees of: (1) nonqualified options
to purchase our common stock, (2) incentive options to
purchase our common stock, (3) share appreciation rights,
(4) deferred share units, (5) restricted shares and
(6) performance shares. Options issued to employees under
the Share Incentive Plan have exercise prices equal to the fair
market value at the date of grant; have five-year lives and vest
over three years. Options issued to continuing non-employee
directors under the Share Incentive Plan have exercise prices
equal to the fair market value at the date of grant, have
five-year lives and vest immediately. In lieu of options,
non-employee directors have been granted the right to receive
one deferred share unit (DSU) for each option which would
otherwise have been granted. These DSUs are vested
immediately and automatically convert to one share of our common
stock when the service as a director terminates. As of
July 31, 2006, 1.3 million shares were reserved for
issuance under this plan, with no more than 0.3 million of
those shares issuable in any form other than stock options.
F-164
Information related to share based compensation follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
July 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of dollars, | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Compensation costs recorded for all plans
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
Tax benefit recognized in income statement for share based
compensation arrangements
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Impact of adopting SFAS 123R to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Share based compensation expense of $1.1 million was
recorded in fiscal 2006 related to restricted stock that would
have been recorded under the provisions of APB No. 25.
SFAS 123(R) requires tax benefits relating to excess share
based compensation deductions to be prospectively presented in
our statement of cash flows as financing cash inflows.
Accordingly, for the year ended July 31, 2006, we reported
$4.3 million of excess tax benefits from share based
compensation as cash provided by financing activities on our
statement of cash flows. We have elected to adopt the
alternative transition method, as described in FASB Staff
Position FAS123(R)-3, in determining our opening amount of
excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies
recognized subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123(R).
Our policy of meeting the requirements upon exercise of stock
options is to issue new shares.
As of July 31, 2006, there was $7.3 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested
share-based
compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be
recognized on a straight line basis over the weighted average
remaining period which is 2 years.
Stock options
The fair value of each option award granted after August 1,
2005 is estimated on the date of grant using a
lattice-based option
valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following
table. Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities
from traded options on our stock and historical volatility of
our stock. We use historical data to estimate option exercise
and employee termination within the valuation model; separate
groups of employees were reviewed and shown to have similar
historical exercise behavior and are considered together for
valuation purposes. The expected term of options granted is
derived from the output of the option valuation model and
represents the period of time that options granted are expected
to be outstanding. The
risk-free rate for
periods within the contractual life of the option is based on
the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
July 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
50.8% |
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
0% |
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
F-165
The following table provides additional information related to
this stock option plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended July 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted | |
|
Average | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Intrinsic | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Grant Date | |
|
Life In | |
|
Value | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Years | |
|
(000s) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning balance
|
|
|
2,422,790 |
|
|
$ |
17.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
209,750 |
|
|
|
31.94 |
|
|
$ |
13.29 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(1,414,462 |
) |
|
|
17.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(39,605 |
) |
|
|
23.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outstanding
|
|
|
1,178,473 |
|
|
|
19.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
44,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable and vested
|
|
|
873,348 |
|
|
|
18.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
33,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year
ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $32.8 million,
$10.3 million and $9.0 million, respectively. The
intrinsic value is the amount by which the fair value of the
underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of an option. Cash
received under all share-based payment arrangements for the year
ended July 31, 2006 was $27.7 million. The tax benefit
realized for the tax deductions resulting from option exercises
of share-based payment arrangements was $4.0 million for
the year ended July 31, 2006.
Performance shares
During October 2005, certain participants were awarded rights to
receive restricted shares of the company in October 2006.
Restricted shares will be granted, if earned, in October 2006.
The number of shares is based upon established performance
targets primarily relating to income before tax provision. The
vesting of the issued restricted shares will be two years after
the performance targets are assessed and therefore the service
period is from the date of grant through July 31, 2008.
These shares were valued initially at $31.94 per share for a
total value of $2.5 million based upon the market price of
the shares at the award date and the expected outcome of the
performance targets. Based on the results for the year ended
July 31, 2006 and that the fiscal 2006 performance targets
were exceeded, we accrued additional share based compensation
related to the performance shares. The shares were valued at
$4.7 million at July 31, 2006, which will be recorded
as compensation expense over the applicable service period. This
compensation plan has been recorded as a liability. We recorded
$1.3 million compensation expense related to this plan
during the 2006 fiscal year.
F-166
Restricted Stock
Restricted shares awarded generally vest ratably over
3 years. The status of the restricted stock as of
July 31, 2005 and the changes during the fiscal year
through July 31, 2006 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
Nonvested at July 31, 2005
|
|
|
54,134 |
|
Activity for the quarter ended October 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
Less: Vested
|
|
|
7,167 |
|
|
Less: Forfeited
|
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at October 31, 2005
|
|
|
142,579 |
|
Activity for the quarter ended January 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
Less: Vested
|
|
|
14,540 |
|
|
Less: Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at January 31, 2006
|
|
|
131,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
Activity for the quarter ended April 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
Less: Vested
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
Less: Forfeited
|
|
|
4,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at April 30, 2006
|
|
|
125,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
Activity for the quarter ended July 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
Less: Vested
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
Less: Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at July 31, 2006
|
|
|
124,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value for the granted
restricted stock was $32.23, $22.72 and $11.98 per share for the
years ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
total fair value of shares vested during the years ended
July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was as follows (in thousands
of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fair value of shares vested
|
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On November 1, 1997, we initiated an employee stock
purchase plan. This plan was amended and restated on
December 11, 2002. The Board of Directors originally
authorized 1,000,000 shares available for issuance under
the plan and at July 31, 2006, 759,529 shares remained
available for issuance. Participation is voluntary and
substantially all full-time employees meeting limited
eligibility requirements may participate. Contributions are made
through payroll deductions and may not be less than 1% or more
than 15% of the participants base pay as defined. The
participants option to purchase common stock is deemed to
be granted on the first day and exercised on the last day of the
fiscal quarter at a price that is the lower of 85% of the market
price on the first or last day of the fiscal quarter. During
fiscal 2005, 86,940 shares of common stock were issued with a
weighted average fair value at grant date of $18.41 per share.
During fiscal 2004, 244,232 shares of common stock were
issued with a weighted average fair value at grant date of $7.47
per share. Information related to the shares granted during
fiscal 2006 is below. The fair value was determined using the
Black-Scholes option valuation method using the assumptions
shown below.
F-167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used in valuation model | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Quarter when | |
|
Grant date | |
|
Risk free | |
|
|
|
Expected | |
|
Expected | |
For the quarter ended |
|
granted | |
|
to be issued | |
|
fair value | |
|
rate | |
|
Volatility | |
|
life | |
|
dividends | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
October 31, 2005
|
|
|
23,144 |
|
|
|
Second FY06 |
|
|
$ |
7.52 |
|
|
|
3.5% |
|
|
|
47% |
|
|
|
90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2006
|
|
|
21,878 |
|
|
|
Third FY06 |
|
|
$ |
7.50 |
|
|
|
3.9% |
|
|
|
40% |
|
|
|
90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2006
|
|
|
19,543 |
|
|
|
Fourth FY06 |
|
|
$ |
10.67 |
|
|
|
4.7% |
|
|
|
39% |
|
|
|
90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
17,807 |
|
|
|
First FY07 |
|
|
$ |
12.07 |
|
|
|
4.9% |
|
|
|
44% |
|
|
|
90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan
We maintain a contributory defined benefit pension plan (the
Pension Plan) for eligible participating employees
in the United Kingdom. Monthly contributions by employees
are equal to 7.0% of their salaries increased from 5.5%
effective December 1, 2005. We provide an additional
contribution in an actuarially determined amount necessary to
fund future benefits to be provided under the Pension Plan.
Benefits provided are based upon 1/60 of the employees
final pensionable salary (as defined in the Pension Plan) for
each complete year of service up to 2/3 of the employees
final pensionable salary and increase annually in line with
inflation subject to a maximum of 5% per annum. The Pension Plan
also provides for 50% of such actual or expected benefits to be
paid to a surviving spouse upon the death of a participant.
Pension Plan assets consist mainly of investments in marketable
securities that are held and managed by an independent trustee.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending
balances of the benefit obligation and the fair value of plan
assets measured at July 31, 2006 and July 31, 2005,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
36,447 |
|
|
$ |
19,882 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
Contributions by plan participants
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
5,915 |
|
|
|
16,295 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
(1,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$ |
48,305 |
|
|
$ |
36,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
18,001 |
|
|
$ |
14,088 |
|
Actual gain on plan assets
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
3,616 |
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange rate changes and other
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
(1,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$ |
22,806 |
|
|
$ |
18,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The funded status of the Pension Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets
|
|
$ |
25,499 |
|
|
$ |
18,446 |
|
Unrecognized prior service costs
|
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
(1,386 |
) |
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
(9,017 |
) |
|
|
(5,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension liability
|
|
$ |
15,160 |
|
|
$ |
12,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-168
Amounts included in the consolidated balance sheet consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Accrued benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
16,482 |
|
|
$ |
13,443 |
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
(1,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension liability
|
|
$ |
15,160 |
|
|
$ |
12,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
|
(2,310 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability in accumulated comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
12,850 |
|
|
$ |
11,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our pension liability is included in Other non-current
liabilities on our balance sheet. The minimum pension
liability is recorded in Accumulated comprehensive
income other on our balance sheet and, net of
tax, was $9.4 million in fiscal 2006 and $8.4 million
in fiscal 2005.
The net periodic pension costs are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Service costs (benefits earned during the period)
|
|
$ |
1,154 |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
542 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,296 |
) |
|
|
(968 |
) |
|
|
(787 |
) |
Net amortization and deferral
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension costs
|
|
$ |
2,662 |
|
|
$ |
1,185 |
|
|
$ |
1,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average assumptions used to determine the projected
benefit obligation and the expected long-term rate of return on
assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.0% |
|
|
|
5.0% |
|
|
|
6.0% |
|
Rates of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
5.0% |
|
|
|
4.3% |
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
Expected long-term rate of return on assets
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
|
6.8% |
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
The expected long-term
rate of return on plan assets reflects the average rate of
earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to
provide for the benefits included in the projected benefit
obligation. We have used a rate we believe is appropriate for
long-term investment in
an equity-based
portfolio. The discount rate is determined by using the return
available from an index of
AA-rated corporate
non-callable bonds of
appropriate duration and currency
The weighted-average
asset allocations by asset category for the plan assets are as
follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years | |
|
|
Ended July | |
|
|
31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Equity securities and property
|
|
|
74.1 |
% |
|
|
98.0 |
% |
Cash and bonds
|
|
|
25.9 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In prior years, our target weighted-average asset allocation for
the plan assets was 100% in equity securities. In order to
further manage the risk of the expected return, during fiscal
2006, this allocation target was changed to 65% in equity
securities, 10% property and 25% in cash and bonds.
F-169
For fiscal 2007, we plan to contribute $1.4 million to the
pension plan. We expect future benefit payments of:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2007
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
2008
|
|
|
85 |
|
2009
|
|
|
94 |
|
2010
|
|
|
107 |
|
2011
|
|
|
138 |
|
Years 2012 to 2015
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
8. Common and Preferred Stock and Exchangeable Shares
We are authorized to issue 78.5 million shares of common
stock.
The Board of Directors, without any action by the stockholders,
may issue up to one million shares of preferred stock, par value
$.01, in one or more series and determine the voting rights,
preferences as to dividends, liquidation, conversion, and other
rights of such stock. There are no shares of preferred stock
outstanding as of July 31, 2006.
On May 27, 1997, our Board of Directors declared a
distribution of one right for each outstanding share of common
stock or Exchangeable Stock to shareholders of record at the
close of business on June 12, 1997 and designated 400,000
shares of the authorized preferred stock as a class to be
distributed under a shareholder rights agreement. Upon the
occurrence of certain events enumerated in the shareholder
rights agreement, each right entitles the registered holder to
purchase a fraction of a share of our preferred stock or the
common stock of an acquiring company. The rights, among other
things, will cause substantial dilution to a person or group
that attempts to acquire our company. The rights expire on
May 15, 2007 and may be redeemed prior to that date. In
September 2006, we amended our shareholder rights plan to
provide that no rights will be issued to our current
shareholders in connection with our previously announced plan to
merge with Compagnie Générale de Géophysique
(CGG).
In January 2006, it was announced that Veritas Energy Services
accelerated the automatic redemption date of its exchangeable
shares and its class A exchangeable shares, series 1
to May 16, 2006, and that Veritas DGC exercised its right
to redeem both classes of Veritas Energy Services exchangeable
shares. On May 16, 2006, the closing date, each
exchangeable share of both classes then outstanding was
exchanged for one share of Veritas DGC common stock. Following
the redemption on May 16, Veritas DGC owned all of the
issued and outstanding shares of Veritas Energy Services.
Therefore, since May 16, 2006, we have had only one class
of stock outstanding.
9. Gain on Involuntary Conversion of Assets
In January 2005, our seismic vessel Veritas Viking experienced
an engine failure while acquiring data in the Gulf of Mexico and
lost substantial amounts of overboard seismic equipment. This
seismic equipment was insured at its replacement cost. As a
result, insurance settlements for reimbursement of certain costs
and to acquire replacement equipment in excess of the book value
of the equipment lost less our deductible were recorded as a
gain of $9.9 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2005. An additional $2.0 million gain was recorded in
the first quarter of fiscal 2006 due to the timing of the
insurance settlements, which were completed as of July 31,
2006. The gain was included as a change in accounts receivable
in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
F-170
10. Other (Income) Expense, Net
Other (income) expense, net consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net foreign currency exchange loss (gain)
|
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
1,248 |
|
Loss from unconsolidated
subsidiary1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
958 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,218 |
) |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
(875 |
) |
|
$ |
1,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 This subsidiary was consolidated with our adoption of
FIN 46R as of April 30, 2004.
11. Net Income Per Common Share
Basic and diluted earnings per common share are computed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
82,231 |
|
|
$ |
83,001 |
|
|
$ |
5,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares (including exchangeable shares)
|
|
|
35,260 |
|
|
|
33,843 |
|
|
|
33,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share
|
|
$ |
2.33 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares (including exchangeable shares)
|
|
|
35,260 |
|
|
|
33,843 |
|
|
|
33,572 |
|
|
Shares issuable from assumed conversion of notes
|
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issuable from assumed exercise of options
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
Shares issuable due to performance shares agreement
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issuable from assumed vesting of restricted stock
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
39,623 |
|
|
|
35,054 |
|
|
|
34,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shares issuable from assumed conversion of notes for the
year ended July 31, 2006 are based upon a stock price of
$57.27, which was the closing price of Veritas DGCs common
stock at July 31, 2006. The shares issuable due to
performance shares agreement relates to the stock to be issued
in relation to meeting certain performance targets. The shares
issuable from this program is also based upon a stock price of
$57.27.
The following options to purchase common shares have been
excluded from the computation assuming dilution because the
exercise prices of the options exceed the average market price
of the underlying common shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of options
|
|
|
13,705 |
|
|
|
681,650 |
|
|
|
1,079,591 |
|
Exercise price range
|
|
|
$43.56 $55.13 |
|
|
|
$26.00 $55.13 |
|
|
|
$14.56 $55.13 |
|
Expiring through
|
|
|
May 2008 |
|
|
|
March 2012 |
|
|
|
March 2012 |
|
12. Assets and liabilities held for sale
As of July 31, 2006 the land seismic acquisition business
was considered held for sale. As of July 31, 2006, the
balance sheet date, it was expected that this business would be
sold to a third party with an expected closing
F-171
to occur in the second fiscal quarter of fiscal 2007. The land
seismic acquisition business met the criteria to be considered
held for sale and was appropriately classified on the balance
sheet in accordance with FAS 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Further,
$2.7 million of depreciation expense was not recorded to
reflect the depreciation expense from the time the assets met
the criteria until the end of the fiscal year. The assets held
for sale were included in the NASA and EAME segments. The land
seismic acquisition business was not considered a discontinued
operation due to our continuing involvement in the business
because of anticipated ongoing contracts.
Subsequent to July 31, 2006, these assets were no longer
considered held for sale. See further discussion in
Note 15, Subsequent Events.
The geophysical vessel, the Searcher, and certain related
equipment was classified as held for sale as of July 31,
2006. This vessel was considered for selling due to the fact
that it was an older vessel and the costs to refurbish it would
be significant. In July 2006, a new vessel, the Veritas Voyager
was placed into service as a replacement to the Searcher.
Obtaining a new vessel is expected to reduce vessel downtime and
maintenance costs. Subsequent to July 31, 2006, the vessel
was sold to a third party for $1 million and a gain of
$0.5 million is to be recorded in the first quarter of
fiscal 2007. The Searcher was included as part of the Asia
Pacific segment.
The amounts reclassified as held for sale are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Land | |
|
Searcher | |
|
|
|
|
acquisition | |
|
vessel | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(amounts in thousands) | |
Materials and inventory
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
Geophysical vessel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,331 |
|
|
|
8,331 |
|
Geophysical equipment
|
|
|
144,096 |
|
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
146,302 |
|
Leasehold improvements and other
|
|
|
23,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
167,959 |
|
|
|
10,537 |
|
|
|
178,496 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(138,003 |
) |
|
|
(10,037 |
) |
|
|
(148,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
29,956 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
30,456 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
35,104 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
$ |
35,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
$ |
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
$ |
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Segment and Geographical Information
We have organized the company into four reportable segments:
North and South America (NASA); Europe, Africa, Middle East and
Commonwealth of Independent States (EAME); Asia Pacific (APAC);
and Veritas Hampson-Russell (VHR). In NASA, EAME and APAC, we
conduct geophysical surveys on both a contract and a
multi-client basis. When we conduct surveys on a contract basis,
we acquire and process data for a single client who pays us to
conduct the survey and owns the data we acquire. When we conduct
surveys on a multi-client basis, we acquire and process data for
our own account and license that data and associated products to
multiple clients. NASA, EAME and APAC offer a common suite of
these products and services to their customers, although each
product or service may be adapted to meet the needs of the local
markets. VHR licenses geophysical software and provides
geophysical reservoir consulting services. The results of
VHRs operations were previously included in those of the
NASA region; however, beginning in fiscal 2006, senior
management began to review the results of VHR separately. This
segmentation of our company is representative of the manner in
which it is viewed and managed by our senior managers and our
Board of Directors. The information related to
F-172
the years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004 have been restated
to reflect the new segment structure. A reconciliation of the
reportable segments results to those of the total
enterprise is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended July 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
NASA | |
|
EAME | |
|
APAC | |
|
VHR | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
541,396 |
|
|
$ |
148,739 |
|
|
$ |
112,466 |
|
|
$ |
19,587 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
822,188 |
|
Depreciation and amortization, net (other than multi-client)
|
|
|
28,778 |
|
|
|
5,518 |
|
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
|
4,004 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
43,920 |
|
Amortization of multi-client library
|
|
|
164,940 |
|
|
|
36,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,975 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
137,194 |
|
|
|
23,533 |
|
|
|
18,142 |
|
|
|
(2,782 |
) |
|
|
(43,208 |
) |
|
|
132,879 |
|
Net income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
141,417 |
|
|
|
24,298 |
|
|
|
18,604 |
|
|
|
(3,106 |
) |
|
|
(41,787 |
) |
|
|
139,426 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
485,989 |
|
|
|
191,077 |
|
|
|
86,810 |
|
|
|
12,436 |
|
|
|
381,718 |
|
|
|
1,158,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended July 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
NASA | |
|
EAME | |
|
APAC | |
|
VHR | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
388,632 |
|
|
$ |
130,989 |
|
|
$ |
98,171 |
|
|
$ |
16,234 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
634,026 |
|
Depreciation and amortization, net (other than multi-client)
|
|
|
27,033 |
|
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
4,519 |
|
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
41,583 |
|
Amortization of multi-client library
|
|
|
112,019 |
|
|
|
43,420 |
|
|
|
4,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,725 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
73,429 |
|
|
|
18,176 |
|
|
|
9,118 |
|
|
|
(4,811 |
) |
|
|
(31,671 |
) |
|
|
64,241 |
|
Net income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
83,660 |
|
|
|
19,161 |
|
|
|
9,677 |
|
|
|
(4,853 |
) |
|
|
(31,402 |
) |
|
|
76,243 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
501,995 |
|
|
|
119,632 |
|
|
|
51,915 |
|
|
|
14,680 |
|
|
|
278,376 |
|
|
|
966,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended July 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
NASA | |
|
EAME | |
|
APAC | |
|
VHR | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
370,916 |
|
|
$ |
118,448 |
|
|
$ |
60,125 |
|
|
$ |
14,980 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
564,469 |
|
Depreciation and amortization, net (other than multi-client)
|
|
|
29,095 |
|
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
4,438 |
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
40,300 |
|
Amortization of multi-client library
|
|
|
148,218 |
|
|
|
56,818 |
|
|
|
4,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,840 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
57,510 |
|
|
|
6,026 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
(3,183 |
) |
|
|
(34,434 |
) |
|
|
27,770 |
|
Net income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
58,772 |
|
|
|
5,918 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
(3,298 |
) |
|
|
(52,598 |
) |
|
|
8,936 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
479,140 |
|
|
|
116,158 |
|
|
|
38,014 |
|
|
|
15,845 |
|
|
|
127,089 |
|
|
|
776,246 |
|
Corporate includes corporate overhead and certain non-recurring
adjustments. The assets within the Corporate segment consist
primarily of cash.
This table presents consolidated revenue by geographic area
based on the location of the use of the product or service for
the years ended July 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Geographic areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
343,299 |
|
|
$ |
287,993 |
|
|
$ |
245,144 |
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
141,667 |
|
|
|
92,639 |
|
|
|
88,283 |
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
67,401 |
|
|
|
17,178 |
|
|
|
57,210 |
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
93,589 |
|
|
|
71,852 |
|
|
|
79,182 |
|
|
Middle East/ Africa
|
|
|
60,771 |
|
|
|
62,515 |
|
|
|
32,513 |
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
115,461 |
|
|
|
101,849 |
|
|
|
62,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
822,188 |
|
|
$ |
634,026 |
|
|
$ |
564,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-173
This table presents property and equipment, net of depreciation,
by geographic area based on the location of the assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Geographic areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
81,773 |
|
|
$ |
93,194 |
|
|
$ |
83,181 |
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
14,808 |
|
|
|
17,317 |
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
7,772 |
|
|
|
8,212 |
|
|
|
8,213 |
|
|
Middle East/ Africa
|
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
3,491 |
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
14,399 |
|
|
|
8,121 |
|
|
|
7,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
110,604 |
|
|
$ |
127,917 |
|
|
$ |
121,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2006, no customer accounted for 10% or more of total
revenue. In fiscal 2005, a single, large
multi-national oil
company represented 12% of our revenue. In fiscal 2004, no
customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenue.
14. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended July 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1st Quarter | |
|
2nd Quarter | |
|
3rd Quarter | |
|
4th Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
168,678 |
|
|
$ |
238,860 |
|
|
$ |
236,219 |
|
|
$ |
178,431 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
11,787 |
|
|
|
31,082 |
|
|
|
32,876 |
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
Net income per common share basic
|
|
|
.34 |
|
|
|
.89 |
|
|
|
.92 |
|
|
|
.18 |
|
Net income per common share diluted
|
|
|
.32 |
|
|
|
.81 |
|
|
|
.84 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended July 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1st Quarter | |
|
2nd Quarter | |
|
3rd Quarter | |
|
4th Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
129,581 |
|
|
$ |
192,228 |
|
|
$ |
175,510 |
|
|
$ |
136,707 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
17,368 |
|
|
|
18,407 |
|
|
|
46,248 |
|
Net income per common share basic
|
|
|
.03 |
|
|
|
.51 |
|
|
|
.54 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
Net income per common share diluted
|
|
|
.03 |
|
|
|
.51 |
|
|
|
.52 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
Quarterly per share amounts may not total to annual per share
amounts because weighted average common shares for the quarter
may vary from weighted average common shares for the year.
15. Subsequent Events
On September 5, 2006, we announced that we terminated
discussions with a third party relating to the possible sale of
the Companys land seismic acquisition business. Subsequent
to July 31, 2006, we have incurred costs of
$10 million in connection with the possible sale of our
land seismic acquisition business, which costs include amounts
paid in settlement of all claims by the third party buyers and
professional fees, including accounting and legal fees. The
depreciation expense of $2.7 million previously not
recorded related to these assets expected to be sold in fiscal
2006 will be recorded in fiscal 2007 as if the assets were not
held for sale at any time. For further discussion on the assets
and liabilities held for sale, see Note 12 above.
On September 4, 2006, the Company and CGG, a French
société anonyme, entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of September 4, 2006 (the Merger
Agreement), by and among the Company, CGG, Volnay
Acquisition Co. I, a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
subsidiary of CGG (Merger Sub I), and Volnay
Acquisition Co. II, a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
subsidiary of CGG (Merger Sub II), under which CGG
has agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company
(Company Common Stock). Under the terms of the
Merger Agreement,
F-174
which was approved by the Boards of Directors of both the
Company and CGG, Merger Sub I will merge with and into the
Company with the Company continuing as the surviving
corporation, and immediately thereafter, the Company will merge
with and into Merger Sub II with Merger Sub II continuing as the
surviving corporation as a wholly owned subsidiary of CGG.
Total consideration for the Company Common Stock is fixed at
$1.5 billion in cash and 47 million American
Depository Shares (the ADSs) of CGG, with each ADS
representing one-fifth of an ordinary share, nominal value
2.00 per share,
of CGG (each a CGG Ordinary Share). Under the terms
of the Merger Agreement, stockholders of the Company will have
the right to elect to receive cash or ADSs, subject to a
proration if either cash or stock is oversubscribed. The per
share consideration is initially set at $75.00 in cash or 2.2501
ADSs and is subject to adjustment upwards or downwards so that
each share of Company Common Stock receives consideration
representing equal value. This adjustment, however, will not
increase or decrease the total amount of cash or the total
number of ADSs to be issued in the transaction. Based on the
closing price of CGGs ADSs on August 29, 2006, the
stockholders of the Company would receive, in the aggregate,
consideration comprised of 51% ADSs and 49% cash.
Consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement is conditioned upon, among other things,
(1) approval by the stockholders of the Company and CGG,
(2) the receipt of all required regulatory approvals and
(3) the effectiveness of the registration statement on
Form F-4 and the
registration statement on
Form F-6 relating
to the ADSs to be issued in the merger. In the event of a
termination of the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances,
the Company or CGG may be required to pay the other party
certain termination fees as more fully explained in the Merger
Agreement filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Veritas DGC Inc.s
Form 8-K dated
September 4, 2006.
Upon closing of the transaction, several significant items would
occur including, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
All of our outstanding stock options would fully vest and
restrictions on most outstanding restricted shares would vest. |
|
|
|
CGG will assume our convertible debt, which would continue to be
fully convertible, and the holders of the debt would have the
option of exercising their put right to CGG. |
|
|
|
Any outstanding borrowings and letters of credit under the
credit facility would be due immediately upon closing of the
transaction. |
|
|
|
A significant amount of severance compensation may be paid to
executives of the company, including the named executive
officers. |
|
|
|
Other material effects of the merger will be more fully
discussed in the proxy statement/prospectus on
Form F-4 which CGG
plans to file with the SEC and in the proxy statement/prospectus
relating to the proposed transaction, which will be sent to each
Veritas stockholder in connection with the meeting of Veritas
stockholders that we intend to call to vote to adopt the merger
agreement. |
16. Guarantor Financial Information
In connection with the merger with CGG, as described above in
Note 15, certain of Veritas subsidiaries will guarantee
obligations on a joint and several, full and unconditional basis
related to debt securities offered by CGG. Each subsidiary
guarantor is owned 100% by the Company. The following tables
present parent guarantor, subsidiary guarantors and combined
non-guarantors condensed consolidating balance sheets of the
Company and its subsidiaries at July 31, 2006 and
July 31, 2005 and the condensed consolidating results of
operations and cash flows for the fiscal years ended
July 31, 2006, July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2004.
The information classifies the Companys subsidiaries into
Veritas DGC Inc. (parent company guarantor), the subsidiary
guarantors, and the combined non-guarantors based upon the
classification of those subsidiaries under the terms of the debt
securities offered by CGG.
F-175
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year ended July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
384,078 |
|
|
$ |
447,846 |
|
|
$ |
(9,736 |
) |
|
$ |
822,188 |
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,788 |
|
|
|
374,428 |
|
|
|
(9,147 |
) |
|
|
646,069 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,809 |
|
|
|
37,755 |
|
|
|
2,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(2,809 |
) |
|
|
65,535 |
|
|
|
70,742 |
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
132,879 |
|
Interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(23,360 |
) |
|
|
21,931 |
|
|
|
(3,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,670 |
) |
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
Equity in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(71,601 |
) |
|
|
(21,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
92,152 |
|
|
|
67,073 |
|
|
|
74,200 |
|
|
|
(93,999 |
) |
|
|
139,426 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
9,921 |
|
|
|
17,621 |
|
|
|
29,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
82,231 |
|
|
$ |
49,452 |
|
|
$ |
44,547 |
|
|
$ |
(93,999 |
) |
|
$ |
82,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year ended July 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
338,261 |
|
|
$ |
300,630 |
|
|
$ |
(4,865 |
) |
|
$ |
634,026 |
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,116 |
|
|
|
280,275 |
|
|
|
(4,501 |
) |
|
|
537,890 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
28,411 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(1,890 |
) |
|
|
47,734 |
|
|
|
18,761 |
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
64,241 |
|
Interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(26,458 |
) |
|
|
26,235 |
|
|
|
(1,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,266 |
) |
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,861 |
) |
Equity in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(51,820 |
) |
|
|
(2,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(1,186 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
76,388 |
|
|
|
33,483 |
|
|
|
20,990 |
|
|
|
(54,618 |
) |
|
|
76,243 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(6,613 |
) |
|
|
(8,230 |
) |
|
|
8,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
83,001 |
|
|
$ |
41,713 |
|
|
$ |
12,905 |
|
|
$ |
(54,618 |
) |
|
$ |
83,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-176
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year ended July 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
294,776 |
|
|
$ |
274,565 |
|
|
$ |
(4,872 |
) |
|
$ |
564,469 |
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,896 |
|
|
|
272,995 |
|
|
|
(2,646 |
) |
|
|
511,245 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
24,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
25,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(1,864 |
) |
|
|
29,690 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
(1,626 |
) |
|
|
27,770 |
|
Interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(4,118 |
) |
|
|
20,283 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,249 |
|
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(2,253 |
) |
|
|
34,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(638 |
) |
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
4,507 |
|
|
|
(24,106 |
) |
|
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
30,052 |
|
|
|
8,936 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
(2,778 |
) |
|
|
7,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
5,221 |
|
|
$ |
(21,328 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,724 |
) |
|
$ |
30,052 |
|
|
$ |
5,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-177
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
5,418 |
|
|
$ |
295,634 |
|
|
$ |
100,903 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
401,955 |
|
|
Restricted cash investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
9,873 |
|
|
|
97,292 |
|
|
|
108,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,244 |
|
|
Materials and supplies inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,899 |
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,366 |
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
14,342 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,917 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
14,616 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
(8,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
Current assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
31,352 |
|
|
|
415,777 |
|
|
|
209,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656,157 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,866 |
|
|
|
68,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359,683 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201,357 |
) |
|
|
(47,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,509 |
|
|
|
21,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,604 |
|
Multi-client data library
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,876 |
|
|
|
166,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,603 |
|
Intercompany receivable
|
|
|
616,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(616,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
190,083 |
|
|
|
149,394 |
|
|
|
76,443 |
|
|
|
(415,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
34,433 |
|
|
|
14,762 |
|
|
|
15,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,210 |
|
Noncurrent assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,598 |
|
|
|
21,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
871,894 |
|
|
$ |
807,916 |
|
|
$ |
510,166 |
|
|
$ |
(1,031,946 |
) |
|
$ |
1,158,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
Accounts payable, trade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,508 |
|
|
|
53,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,863 |
|
|
Accrued and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
3,177 |
|
|
|
24,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,224 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
24,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,280 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
41,711 |
|
|
|
27,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,313 |
|
|
Current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,124 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
157,799 |
|
|
|
124,136 |
|
|
|
130,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,925 |
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,913 |
|
|
|
118,113 |
|
|
|
(616,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
9,386 |
|
|
|
21,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
507,299 |
|
|
|
139,737 |
|
|
|
(616,026 |
) |
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
3,132 |
|
|
|
26,936 |
|
|
|
(30,068 |
) |
|
|
372 |
|
Other stockholders equity
|
|
|
710,172 |
|
|
|
173,349 |
|
|
|
212,503 |
|
|
|
(385,852 |
) |
|
|
710,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
710,544 |
|
|
|
176,481 |
|
|
|
239,439 |
|
|
|
(415,920 |
) |
|
|
710,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
871,894 |
|
|
$ |
807,916 |
|
|
$ |
510,166 |
|
|
$ |
(1,031,946 |
) |
|
$ |
1,158,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-178
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
July 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
2,977 |
|
|
$ |
177,824 |
|
|
$ |
68,592 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
249,393 |
|
|
Restricted cash investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
91,675 |
|
|
|
74,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,989 |
|
|
Materials and supplies inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,381 |
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
13,482 |
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,900 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
9,627 |
|
|
|
12,819 |
|
|
|
(9,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
14,003 |
|
|
|
299,159 |
|
|
|
139,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,386 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,354 |
|
|
|
148,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495,090 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246,191 |
) |
|
|
(120,982 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,163 |
|
|
|
27,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,917 |
|
Multi-client data library
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,206 |
|
|
|
175,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,793 |
|
Intercompany receivable
|
|
|
559,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(559,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
138,816 |
|
|
|
157,114 |
|
|
|
87,311 |
|
|
|
(383,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
43,221 |
|
|
|
10,199 |
|
|
|
16,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
755,658 |
|
|
$ |
707,841 |
|
|
$ |
445,958 |
|
|
$ |
(942,859 |
) |
|
$ |
966,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, trade
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
37,569 |
|
|
$ |
38,180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
75,810 |
|
|
Accrued and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
9,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,402 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,020 |
|
|
|
18,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,043 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
44,765 |
|
|
|
19,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
|
|
106,354 |
|
|
|
76,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,448 |
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
Intercompany payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,121 |
|
|
|
101,497 |
|
|
|
(559,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
8,126 |
|
|
|
10,342 |
|
|
|
18,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
163,126 |
|
|
|
468,463 |
|
|
|
119,631 |
|
|
|
(559,618 |
) |
|
|
191,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
3,132 |
|
|
|
26,985 |
|
|
|
(30,117 |
) |
|
|
355 |
|
Other stockholders equity
|
|
|
582,193 |
|
|
|
129,892 |
|
|
|
223,232 |
|
|
|
(353,124 |
) |
|
|
582,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
582,548 |
|
|
|
133,024 |
|
|
|
250,217 |
|
|
|
(383,241 |
) |
|
|
582,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
755,658 |
|
|
$ |
707,841 |
|
|
$ |
445,958 |
|
|
$ |
(942,859 |
) |
|
$ |
966,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-179
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
Cash flows from (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
(29,580 |
) |
|
$ |
174,295 |
|
|
$ |
191,900 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
336,615 |
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,485 |
) |
|
|
(160,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216,842 |
) |
Financing activities
|
|
|
32,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
117,810 |
|
|
|
29,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,771 |
|
Currency gain on foreign cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
117,810 |
|
|
|
32,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,562 |
|
Beginning cash balance
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
177,824 |
|
|
|
68,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash balance
|
|
$ |
5,418 |
|
|
$ |
295,634 |
|
|
$ |
100,903 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
401,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended July 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
Cash flows from (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
(8,133 |
) |
|
$ |
171,513 |
|
|
$ |
167,915 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
331,295 |
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,492 |
) |
|
|
(129,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206,715 |
) |
Financing activities
|
|
|
7,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
94,021 |
|
|
|
38,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,232 |
|
Currency gain on foreign cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
94,021 |
|
|
|
39,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,094 |
|
Beginning cash balance
|
|
|
3,458 |
|
|
|
83,803 |
|
|
|
29,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash balance
|
|
$ |
2,977 |
|
|
$ |
177,824 |
|
|
$ |
68,592 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
249,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended July 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Subsidiary | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | |
Cash flows from (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
45,737 |
|
|
$ |
91,248 |
|
|
$ |
106,049 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
243,034 |
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,257 |
) |
|
|
(93,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152,392 |
) |
Financing activities
|
|
|
(46,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
(945 |
) |
|
|
31,991 |
|
|
|
12,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,960 |
|
Currency gain on foreign cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(945 |
) |
|
|
31,991 |
|
|
|
13,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,202 |
|
Beginning cash balance
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
|
|
51,812 |
|
|
|
15,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash balance
|
|
$ |
3,458 |
|
|
$ |
83,803 |
|
|
$ |
29,038 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
116,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-180
On July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation Number
(FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement 109.
This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an entitys financial statements
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
It prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute
for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or
expected to be taken on a tax return. This interpretation is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. The Group will be required to adopt this interpretation in
the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. Management is currently
evaluating the requirements of FIN 48 and has not yet
determined the impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the Securities Exchange Commission
(SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 addresses the
diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement
misstatements and establishes an approach that requires
quantification of financial statement misstatements based on the
effects of the misstatements on each of the Groups
financial statements and the related disclosures. SAB 108
is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15,
2006. Management currently does not expect that the adoption of
SAB 108 will have a material impact on the Groups
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158,
EmployersAccounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans. SFAS 158 requires the
employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a
single-employer defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset
or liability in its balance sheet and to recognize changes in
that funded status in the year in which the changes occur
through comprehensive income. SFAS 158 also requires an
employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date
of its year-end balance sheet. SFAS 158 is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. Management
currently does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 158
will have a material impact on the Groups consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
fair value measurement disclosures. SFAS 157 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Group will be required to adopt this
interpretation in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Management is currently evaluating whether adoption of
SFAS 157 will have an impact on the Groups
consolidated financial statements.
F-181
Part II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
|
|
ITEM 8. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
As used in this Item 8, we, us and
our refer to the entity in the corresponding heading.
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas
The French Commercial Code prohibits provisions of statuts
that limit the liability of directors. The French Commercial
Code also prohibits a company from indemnifying its directors
against liability. However, if a director is sued by a third
party and ultimately prevails in the litigation on all counts,
but is nevertheless required to bear attorneys fees and
costs, the company may reimburse those fees and costs pursuant
to an indemnification arrangement with the director.
Our statuts do not expressly provide for indemnification
by us of liabilities of our directors or officers in their
capacity as such. However, we maintain officers and
directors liability insurance, which insures against
certain liabilities that officers and directors in our group
companies may incur in such capacities, including liabilities
arising under the U.S. securities laws, subject to certain
exceptions.
CGG Americas Inc.
Article 2.02-1 of the Texas Business Corporation Act, as
amended, authorizes us to indemnify certain persons, including
any person who was, is or is threatened to be made a named
defendant or respondent in a threatened, pending, or completed
action, suit or proceeding because the person is or was a
director or officer, against judgments, penalties (including
excise and similar taxes), fines, settlements and reasonable
expenses (including court costs and attorneys fees)
actually incurred by the person in connection with the
threatened, pending, or completed action, suit or proceeding, if
it is determined that the person conducted himself in good
faith, reasonably believed, in the case of conduct in his
official capacity, that his conduct was in our best interests,
or in all other cases, that his conduct was not opposed to our
best interests, and in the case of any criminal proceeding, had
no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. We
are required by Article 2.02-1 to indemnify a director or
officer against reasonable expenses (including court costs and
attorneys fees) incurred by him in connection with a
threatened, pending, or completed action, suit or proceeding in
which he is a named defendant or respondent because he is or was
a director or officer if he has been wholly successful, on the
merits or otherwise, in the defense of the action, suit or
proceeding. Article 2.02-1 provides that indemnification
pursuant to its provisions is not exclusive of other rights of
indemnification to which a person may be entitled under the
corporations articles of incorporation or any bylaw,
agreement vote of shareholders or disinterested directors, or
otherwise.
Our revised bylaws state that we will indemnify any person who
was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
(a) threatened, pending, or completed action, suit,
proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
administrative (other than an action by us or in our right), by
reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer,
employee, fiduciary or agent of another corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise against
expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments, fines, and
amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by
him in connection with such action, suit, or proceeding if he
acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be
in our best interest and, with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, has no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was
unlawful and (b) threatened, pending, or completed action
or suit by us or in our right to procure a judgment in our favor
by reason of the fact that he is or was our director, officer,
employee, fiduciary, or agent or is or was serving at our
request as a director, officer, employee, fiduciary, or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or
another enterprise against expenses (including attorneys
fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him or in connection
with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if he
acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be
in our best interest; but no indemnification will be made in
respect of any claim, issue, or matter as to which such person
has been adjudged to be liable for negligence or misconduct in
the performance of his duty to us unless and only to the extent
that the court in which such action or suit was
II-1
brought determines upon application that such person is fairly
and reasonably entitled to indemnification for such expenses
which such court deems proper. To the extent that our director,
officer, employee, fiduciary, or agent has been successful on
the merits, he will be indemnified against expenses (including
attorneys fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him. A
determination that indemnification is proper will be made by a
majority vote of a quorum of our board of directors, consisting
of a majority of uninterested directors or, in some
circumstances, by independent legal counsel in a written
opinion, or by the shareholders. These provisions may be
sufficiently broad to indemnify such persons for liabilities
arising under the U.S. securities laws.
CGG Canada Services Ltd.
Under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta), we may indemnify
a present or former director or officer or a person who acts or
acted at our request as a director or officer of a body
corporate of which we are or were a shareholder or creditor, and
his heirs and legal representatives, against all costs, charges
and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or
satisfy a judgment, reasonably incurred by him in respect of any
civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which
he is made a party by reason of being or having been a director
or officer of us or that body corporate, if the director or
officer acted honestly and in good faith with a view to our best
interests, and, in the case of a criminal or administrative
action or proceeding that is enforced by a monetary penalty, had
reasonable grounds for believing that his conduct was lawful.
Such indemnification may be in connection with a derivative
action only with court approval. A director or officer is
entitled to indemnification from us as a matter of right if he
or she was substantially successful on the merits, fulfilled the
conditions set forth above, and is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity. In addition, we may advance funds to a
person in order to defray the costs, charges and expenses of a
proceeding referred to above. However, such person will be
required to repay the funds advanced if he or she is not
substantially successful on the merits, does not fulfill the
conditions set forth above and is not fairly and reasonably
entitled to the indemnity. In addition, we may advance funds to
a person in order to defray the costs, charges and expenses of a
proceeding referred to above. However, such person will be
required to repay the funds advanced if he or she is not
substantially successful on the merits, does not fulfill the
conditions set forth above and is not fairly and reasonably
entitled to the indemnity.
Subject to the limitations in the Business Corporations Act
(Alberta), our revised by-law no. 1 provides that we will
indemnify a director, or a former director or officer, or a
person who acts or acted at our request as a director or officer
of a body corporate of which we are or were a shareholder or
creditor and his heirs and legal representatives, against all
costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle
an action or satisfy a judgment, reasonably incurred by him in
respect of any civil, criminal or administrative action or
proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of being of
having been our director or officer of such body corporate, if
(a) he acted honestly in good faith with a view to our best
interests; and (b) in the case of a criminal or
administrative action or proceeding that is enforced by a
monetary penalty, he had reasonable grounds for believing that
his conduct was lawful. These provisions may be sufficiently
broad to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising under
the U.S. securities laws.
CGG Marine Resources Norge A/ S
Norwegian law provides that a director or the chief executive
officer of a Norwegian company is liable for any loss or damage
he has intentionally or negligently caused the company in the
performance of his duties. The shareholders may, by a majority
resolution at the general meeting, either hold liable or
discharge from liability such director or chief executive
officer. Notwithstanding a decision at the general meeting to
discharge a person from liability or to reject a proposal to
hold a person liable, shareholders owning at least 10% of the
share capital may within a limited period of time bring a claim
predicated on such liability on behalf of the company.
Our articles of association do not expressly provide for
indemnification by us of liabilities of our directors or
officers in their capacity as such.
II-2
Sercel, Inc.
The Oklahoma General Corporation Act allows us to indemnify each
of our officers and directors against expenses, including
attorneys fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in
connection with any action, suit or proceeding brought by reason
of the fact that such person is or has been our director,
officer, employee or agent, or of any other corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise at our
request, other than an action by us or in our right. Such
indemnification may only be provided if the individual acted in
good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or
not opposed to our best interest, and with respect to any
criminal action, the person seeking indemnification had no
reasonable cause to believe that the conduct was unlawful. The
Oklahoma General Corporation Act also allows us to indemnify our
officers and directors for expenses, including attorneys
fees, actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the
defense or settlement of any action or suit by us or in our
right brought by reason of the person seeking indemnification
being or having been our director, officer, employee, or of any
other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise at our request, provided the actions were in good
faith and were reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
our best interest. No indemnification shall be made in respect
of any claim, issue or matter as to which the individual shall
have been adjudged liable to us, unless and only to the extent
that the court in which such action was decided has determined
that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all
the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and
reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the
court deems proper.
Our bylaws provide that, to the extent and in the manner
permitted by the laws of the State of Oklahoma and specifically
as is permitted under Section 1031 of Title 18 of the
Oklahoma Statutes, we will indemnify any person who was or is a
party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened,
pending or completed action, suit or proceeding whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative, other than an action
by us or in our right, by reason of the fact that such person is
or was our director, officer, employee or agent, or is or was
serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent
of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or
other enterprise against expenses, including attorneys
fees, judgment, fines and amounts paid in settlement. These
provisions may be sufficiently broad to indemnify such persons
for liabilities arising under the U.S. securities laws.
Sercel Australia Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
Corporations Act of Australia |
Section 199A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth)
(the Corporations Act) provides that a company or a
related body corporate must not exempt a person (whether
directly or through an interposed entity) from a liability to
the company incurred as an officer of the company.
Section 199A(2) of the Corporations Act provides that a
company or a related body corporate must not indemnify a person
(whether by agreement or by making a payment and whether
directly or through an interposed entity) against any of the
following liabilities incurred as an officer of the company:
|
|
|
|
|
a liability owed to the company or a related body corporate; |
|
|
|
a liability for a pecuniary penalty order or compensation order
under sections 1317G, 1317H or 1317HA of the Corporations
Act; or |
|
|
|
a liability that is owed to someone other than the company or a
related body corporate that did not arise out of conduct in good
faith. |
Section 199A(2) does not apply to a liability for legal
costs.
Indemnification (as opposed to exemption) which falls outside
this provision is permissible.
Section 199A(3) provides that a company or a related body
corporate must not indemnify a person (whether by agreement or
by making a payment and whether directly or through an
interposed entity) against
II-3
legal costs incurred in defending an action for a liability
incurred as an officer of the company if the costs are incurred:
|
|
|
|
|
in defending or resisting proceedings in which the person is
found to have a liability for which they could not be
indemnified under section 199A(2); or |
|
|
|
in defending or resisting criminal proceedings in which the
person is found guilty; or |
|
|
|
in defending or resisting proceedings brought by the Australian
Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) or a
liquidator for a court order if the grounds for making the order
are found by the court to have been established (but this does
not apply to costs incurred in responding to actions taken by
ASIC or a liquidator as part of an investigation before
commencing proceedings for the court order); or |
|
|
|
in connection with proceedings for relief to the person under
the Corporations Act in which the court denies the relief. |
Section 199B of the Corporations Act provides that a
company or a related body corporate must not pay, or agree to
pay, a premium for a contract insuring a person who is or has
been an officer of the company against a liability (other than
one for legal costs) arising out of:
|
|
|
|
|
conduct involving a willful breach of any duty in relation to
the company; or |
|
|
|
a contravention of the officers duties under the
Corporations Act not to improperly use their position or make
improper use of information obtained as an officer. |
A contract will be void to the extent to which it purports to
provide such insurance.
For the purpose of sections 199A and 199B, an
officer of a company includes:
|
|
|
|
|
a director or secretary; |
|
|
|
a person who makes, or participates in making, decisions that
affect the whole, or a substantial part, of the business of the
company; |
|
|
|
a person who has the capacity to significantly affect the
companys financial standing; and |
|
|
|
a person in accordance with whose instructions or wishes the
directors of the company are accustomed to act. |
Our constitution provides that, to the extent permitted by law
and without limiting our powers, we must indemnify each person
who is, or has been, our director or secretary against any
liability which results from facts or circumstances relating to
the person serving or having served as a director, secretary or
employee of us or any of our subsidiaries (a) other than a
liability owed to us or a related body corporate, a liability
for a pecuniary penalty order under section 1317G or a
compensation order under section 1317H of the Corporation
Act or a liability this is owed to someone (other than us or a
related body corporate) and did not arise out of conduct in good
faith (but this does not apply to a liability for legal costs)
or (b) other than for legal costs incurred in defending an
action for liability if the costs are incurred:
|
|
|
|
(i) |
in defending or resisting civil proceedings in which the person
is found to have a liability for which they could not be
indemnified under paragraph (a); or |
|
|
(ii) |
is defending or resisting criminal proceedings in which the
person is found guilty; |
|
|
(iii) |
in defending or resisting proceedings brought by ASIC or a
liquidator for a court order if the grounds for making the order
are found by the court to be established; |
|
|
(iv) |
in connection with proceedings for relief to the person under
the Corporations Act in which the Court denies relief. |
|
|
|
Paragraph (iii) does not apply to costs incurred in
responding to actions brought by ASIC or a liquidator as part of
an investigation before commencing proceedings for the court
order. |
II-4
These provisions may be sufficiently broad to indemnify such
persons for liabilities arising under the U.S. securities
laws.
Sercel Canada Ltd.
Under the Business Corporations Act (New Brunswick) we may
indemnify a present or former director or officer or a person
who acts or acted at our request as a director or officer of a
body corporate of which we are or were a shareholder or
creditor, and his heirs and legal representatives, against all
costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle
an action or satisfy a judgement, reasonably incurred by him in
respect of any civil, criminal or administrative action or
proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of being or
having been a director or officer of us or that body corporate,
if the director or officer acted honestly and in good faith with
a view to our best interests, and, in the case of a criminal or
administrative action or proceeding that is enforced by a
monetary penalty, had reasonable ground for believing that his
conduct was lawful. Such indemnification may be in connection
with an action by or on behalf of our corporation or body
corporate only with court approval. A director or officer is
entitled to indemnification from us as a matter of right if he
or she was substantially successful on the merits, fulfilled the
conditions set forth above, and is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity.
Our by-law no. 1 provides that, subject to subsections 81(2) and
81(3) of the Business Corporations Act (New Brunswick), except
in respect to an action by or on behalf of us to procure a
judgment in our favor, we will indemnify a director or officer,
or a former director or officer, and each person who acts or
acted at our request as a director or officer of a body
corporate of which we are or were a shareholder or creditor, and
his heirs and legal representatives, against all costs, charges
and expenses, including any amount paid to settle an action or
satisfy a judgment reasonably incurred by him in respect of any
civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which
he is made a party by reason of being of having been our
director or officer of such corporation or body corporate, if
(a) he acted honestly in good faith with a view to our best
interests; and (b) in the case of a criminal or
administrative action or proceeding that is enforced by a
monetary penalty, he had reasonable grounds for believing that
his conduct was lawful. These provisions may be sufficiently
broad to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising under
the U.S. securities laws.
CGGVeritas Services Inc., Veritas DGC Land Inc., Veritas
Geophysical Corporation, Veritas Investments Inc., Viking
Maritime Inc., Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd. and Alitheia
Resources Inc.
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits
a corporation to indemnify any person who was or is a party or
is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he
is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the
corporation or is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise against expenses (including attorneys fees),
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action.
In a suit brought to obtain a judgment in the corporations
favor, whether by the corporation itself or derivatively by a
stockholder, the corporation may only indemnify for expenses,
including attorneys fees, actually and reasonably incurred
in connection with the defense or settlement of the case, and
the corporation may not indemnify for amounts paid in
satisfaction of a judgment or in settlement of the claim. In any
such action, no indemnification may be paid in respect of any
claim, issue or matter as to which such persons shall have been
adjudged liable to the corporation except as otherwise provided
by the Delaware Court of Chancery or the court in which the
claim was brought. In any other type of proceeding, the
indemnification may extend to judgments, fines and amounts paid
in settlement, actually and reasonably incurred in connection
with such other proceeding, as well as to expenses (including
attorneys fees).
The statute does not permit indemnification unless the person
seeking indemnification has acted in good faith and in a manner
he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best
interest of the corporation and, in the case of criminal actions
or proceedings, the person had no reasonable cause to believe
his conduct was unlawful. There are additional limitations
applicable to criminal actions and to actions brought by or in
the name of the corporation. The determination as to whether a
person seeking indemnification has met the
II-5
required standard of conduct is to be made (i) by a
majority vote of a quorum of disinterested members of the board
of directors, or (ii) by independent counsel in a written
opinion, if such a quorum does not exist or if the disinterested
directors so direct, or (iii) by the stockholders.
Prior to the merger, the restated certificate of incorporation
and bylaws of Veritas DGC required Veritas DGC to indemnify its
directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under
Delaware law. In addition, prior to the merger, Veritas DGC
entered into indemnification agreements with each of its
officers and directors providing for indemnification to the
fullest extent permitted under Delaware law. Veritas DGCs
restated certificate of incorporation limited the personal
liability of a director to Veritas DGC or its stockholders to
damages for breach of the directors fiduciary duty.
Prior to the merger, Veritas DGC maintained insurance on behalf
of its directors and officers and the directors and officers of
its subsidiaries against certain liabilities that may be
asserted against, or incurred by, such persons in their
capacities as directors or officers, or that may arise out of
their status as directors or officers of Veritas DGC or its
subsidiaries, including liabilities under the federal and state
securities laws.
The merger agreement provides that, for a period of six years
following the effective time of the merger, CGG and CGGVeritas
Services, as successor in interest to Veritas DGC, shall,
jointly and severally, indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
present and former officers, directors, employees and agents of
Veritas DGC in such capacities to the fullest extent that
Veritas DGC would have been required to do so in accordance with
the provisions of each indemnification or similar agreement or
arrangement with Veritas DGC. CGG and CGGVeritas Services
agreed that all rights to exculpation, advancement of expenses
and indemnification for acts or omissions occurring prior to the
merger now existing in favor of the current and former officers
and directors of Veritas as provided in the certificate of
incorporation, bylaws or any material contract of Veritas DGC,
will survive the merger and continue in full force and effect in
accordance with their terms.
The merger agreement further provided that, for a period of six
years following the merger, CGG and CGGVeritas Services shall
take all necessary actions to ensure that CGGs
directors and officers liability insurance continues
to cover each officer and director of Veritas, in each case so
long as they remain employed or retained by CGG as an officer or
director. CGG will also maintain a tail directors and
officers liability insurance from an insurance carrier
with the same or better credit rating as Veritas current
insurance carrier, with a claims period of six years from the
merger, with respect to the directors and officers of Veritas
who are currently covered by Veritas existing
directors and officers liability insurance with
respect to claims arising from facts or events that occurred
before the merger, in an amount and scope and on terms and
conditions no less favorable to such directors and officers than
those in effect at the signing of the merger agreement.
The current certificates of incorporation and bylaws of Veritas
DGC Land Inc., Veritas Geophysical Corporation, Veritas
Investments Inc., Viking Maritime Inc., and Alitheia Resources
Inc. require each corporation to indemnify its respective
directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under
Delaware law. The certificate of incorporation and bylaws of
Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd. contain no indemnification
provisions.
Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC
Section 18-108 of
the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act provides that,
subject to such standards and restrictions, if any, as are set
forth in its limited liability company agreement, a limited
liability company may, and shall have the power to, indemnify
and hold harmless any member or manager or other person from and
against all claims and demands whatsoever.
Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC was formed under the laws of
the State of Delaware. The operating agreement of Veritas
Geophysical (Mexico) LLC provides, in effect, that, subject to
certain limitations, it will indemnify its members, officers,
directors, employees and agents of Veritas Geophysical (Mexico)
LLC (collectively, the Covered Persons), to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law, for any loss, damage
or claim incurred by such Covered Person by reason of any act or
omission performed or omitted by such Covered Person in good
faith on behalf of Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC and in a
manner reasonably
II-6
believed to be within the scope of authority conferred on such
Covered Person by the operating agreement, except that no
Covered Person shall be entitled to be indemnified in respect of
any loss, damage or claim incurred by such Covered Person by
reason of gross negligence or willful misconduct with respect to
such acts or omissions; provided however, that any indemnity
under the operating agreement shall be provided out of and to
the extent of assets of Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC only,
and no Covered Person shall have any personal liability with
respect to such indemnity.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, expenses
(including legal fees) incurred by a Covered Person in defending
any claim, demand, action, suit or proceeding shall, from time
to time, be advanced by Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC prior
to the final disposition of such claim, demand, action, suit or
proceeding upon receipt by Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC of
an undertaking by or on behalf of the Covered Person to repay
such amount if it shall be determined that the Covered Person is
not entitled to be indemnified as authorized in the operating
agreement.
A Covered Person shall be fully protected in relying in good
faith upon the records of Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC and
upon such information, opinions, reports or statements presented
to Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC by any person as to matters
the Covered Person reasonably believes are within such other
persons professional or expert competence and who has been
selected with reasonable care by or on behalf of Veritas
Geophysical (Mexico) LLC, including information, opinions,
reports or statements as to the value and amount of the assets,
liabilities, profits, losses or net cash flow or any other facts
pertinent to the existence and amount of assets from which
distributions to members might properly be paid.
To the extent that, at law or in equity, a Covered Person has
duties (including fiduciary duties) and liabilities relating to
such duties to Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC or to any other
Covered Person, a Covered Person acting under the operating
agreement shall not be liable to Veritas Geophysical (Mexico)
LLC or to any member for its good faith reliance on the
provisions of the operating agreement. The provisions of the
operating agreement, to the extent that they restrict the duties
and liabilities of such Covered Person otherwise existing at law
or in equity, are agreed by the parties to replace such other
duties and liabilities of such Covered Person.
II-7
|
|
ITEM 9. |
Exhibits and Financial Schedules |
The following instruments and documents are included as Exhibits
to this Registration Statement. Exhibits incorporated by
reference are so indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
1.1*
|
|
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement among the Registrants, Credit
Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited and the other parties thereto. |
3.1**
|
|
|
|
English translation of the Articles of Association
(statuts) of Compagnie Générale de
Géophysique-Veritas |
3.2
|
|
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of CGG Americas Inc., dated
May 15, 1998.(1) |
3.3
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of CGG
Americas, Inc., dated December 1, 1999.(1) |
3.4
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment by the Sole Shareholder to the Articles of
Incorporation of CGG Americas Inc., dated December 22,
2001.(1) |
3.5
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment by the Sole Shareholder to the Articles of
Incorporation of CGG Americas Inc., dated December 15,
2004.(1) |
3.6
|
|
|
|
Revised bylaws of Georex, Inc. (CGG Americas Inc.)(1) |
3.7
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amalgamation of CGG Canada Services Ltd.(1) |
3.8
|
|
|
|
CGG Canada Services Ltd. Resolution of the Sole Shareholder.(1) |
3.9
|
|
|
|
By-law No. 1 of CGG Canada Services Ltd.(1) |
3.10
|
|
|
|
Articles of Association of CGG Marine Resources Norge A/S.(1) |
3.11
|
|
|
|
Amended Certificate of Incorporation of Opseis, Inc. (Sercel,
Inc.), dated February 24, 1993.(1) |
3.12
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of
Opseis, Inc. (Sercel, Inc.), dated December 23, 1996.(1) |
3.13
|
|
|
|
Bylaws of Opseis, Inc. (Sercel, Inc.)(1) |
3.14
|
|
|
|
Constitution of Sercel Australia Pty Ltd.(1) |
3.15
|
|
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of Sercel Canada Ltd.(1) |
3.16
|
|
|
|
By-Law No. 1 of Sercel Canada Ltd.(1) |
3.17**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Volnay Acquisition Co. II
(CGGVeritas Services Inc.), dated September 5, 2006. |
3.18**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of
Volnay Acquisition Co. II (CGGVeritas Services Inc.), dated
January 12, 2007. |
3.19**
|
|
|
|
Bylaws of Volnay Acquisition Co. II (CGGVeritas Services
Inc.). |
3.20**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Veritas DGC Land Inc., dated
March 20, 1997. |
3.21**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Merger of Veritas DGC Land with and into Veritas
DGC Land Inc., dated July 30, 1997. |
3.22**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Merger of Airjac Drilling Inc. with and into
Veritas DGC Land Inc., dated July 24, 1998. |
3.23**
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (with Amendments) of
Veritas DGC Land Inc., dated July 18, 2000. |
3.24**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Merger of Neptune Holdco LLC into Veritas DGC
Land Inc., dated March 8, 2004. |
3.25**
|
|
|
|
Bylaws of Veritas DGC Land Inc. |
3.26**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Seismic Company of
America, Inc. with and into Digicon Geophysical Corp. (Veritas
Geophysical Corporation), dated July 30, 1997. |
3.27**
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (with Amendments) of
Digicon Geophysical Corp. (Veritas Geophysical Corporation),
dated February 6, 2001. |
3.28**
|
|
|
|
Bylaws of Veritas Geophysical Corporation. |
II-8
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
3.29**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Veritas Geophysical Inc.
(Veritas Investments Inc.), dated February 23, 1998. |
3.30**
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (with Amendments) of
Veritas Geophysical Inc. (Veritas Investments Inc.), dated
February 6, 2001. |
3.31**
|
|
|
|
Bylaws of Veritas Investments Inc. |
3.32**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Viking Maritime Inc., dated
March 29, 2001. |
3.33**
|
|
|
|
Bylaws of Viking Maritime Inc. |
3.34**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC,
dated February 20, 2001. |
3.35**
|
|
|
|
Operating Agreement of Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC. |
3.36**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Digicon Exploration, Ltd.
(Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd.), dated November 30, 1967. |
3.37**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of
Digicon Exploration Ltd. (Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd.), dated
December 3, 1997. |
3.38**
|
|
|
|
Bylaws of Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd. |
3.39**
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Alitheia Resources Inc., dated
June 29, 2004. |
3.40**
|
|
|
|
Bylaws of Alitheia Resources Inc. |
4.1
|
|
|
|
Indenture dated as of April 28, 2005 among certain of the
Registrants and The Bank of New York (formerly JP Morgan Chase
Bank, National Association), as Trustee, which includes the form
of the
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 as an exhibit thereto.(1) |
4.2**
|
|
|
|
Form of Supplemental Indenture to be entered into among the
Registrants and The Bank of New York, as Trustee. |
4.3**
|
|
|
|
Form of Indenture to be entered into among the Registrants and
The Bank of New York, as Trustee, which includes the form of
Senior Notes due 2017 as an exhibit thereto. |
5.1**
|
|
|
|
Opinion of Linklaters, special U.S. counsel to the
Registrants, as to the legality of the notes and the guarantees. |
12.1**
|
|
|
|
Statement re Computation of Ratios. |
23.1**
|
|
|
|
Consent of Linklaters, special U.S. counsel to the
Registrants (included in Exhibit 5.1). |
23.2**
|
|
|
|
Consent of Barbier Frinault & Autres Ernst &
Young Audit and Mazars & Guérard. |
23.3**
|
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young AS. |
23.4**
|
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young. |
23.5**
|
|
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
25.1
|
|
|
|
Statement of Eligibility of Trustee.(1) |
25.2**
|
|
|
|
Statement of Eligibility of Trustee. |
|
|
|
|
* |
The Registrants will file as an exhibit to a current report on
Form 6-K
(i) any underwriting agreement relating to securities
offered hereby, (ii) the instruments setting forth the
terms of any debt securities and guarantees of debt securities
or preferred stock, (iii) any required opinion of counsel
to the Registrants as to certain tax matters relative to
securities offered hereby, or (iv) any additional required
opinion of counsel with respect to the legality of the
securities offered hereby. |
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Forms F-4 and S-4
(SEC File
No. 333-126556),
dated July 13, 2005, as amended. |
II-9
The undersigned Registrants hereby undertake:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being
made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement: |
|
|
|
|
|
To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of
the Securities Act; |
|
|
|
To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after
the effective date of the registration statement (or the most
recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or
in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the
information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act if, in the aggregate,
the changes in volume and price represent no more than a
20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price
set forth in the Calculation of Registration Fee
table in the effective registration statement; |
|
|
|
To include any material information with respect to the plan of
distribution not previously disclosed in the registration
statement or any material change to such information in the
registration statement: |
|
|
|
provided, however, that the paragraphs above do not apply
if the information required to be included in a post-effective
amendment by those paragraphs is contained in reports filed with
or furnished to the Commission by the Registrants pursuant to
section 13 or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 that are incorporated by reference in the
registration statement, or is contained in a form of prospectus
filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) that is part of the
registration statement. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be
deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the
securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide
offering thereof. |
|
|
(3) |
To remove from registration by means of a post-effective
amendment any of the securities being registered which remain
unsold at the termination of the offering. |
|
|
(4) |
To file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement
to include any financial statements required by Item 8.A of
Form 20-F at the
start of any delayed offering or throughout a continuous
offering. Financial statements and information otherwise
required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Act need not be
furnished, provided that the Registrants include in the
prospectus, by means of a post-effective amendment, financial
statements required pursuant to this paragraph (a)(4) and
other information necessary to ensure that all other information
in the prospectus is at least as current as the date of those
financial statements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a
post-effective amendment need not be filed to include financial
statements and information required by Section 10(a)(3) of
the Securities Act of 1933 if such financial statements and
information are contained in periodic reports filed with or
furnished to the Commission by the Registrants pursuant to
Section 13 or Section l5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 that are incorporated by reference in this registration
statement. |
|
|
(5) |
That, for the purpose of determining liability under the
Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser: |
|
|
|
|
A. |
Each prospectus filed by the Registrants pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(3) shall be deemed to be part of the
registration statement as of the date the filed prospectus was
deemed part of and included in the registration
statement; and |
|
|
|
|
B. |
Each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of a registration
statement in reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering
made pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or (x) for
the purpose of providing the information required by
section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed
to |
II-10
|
|
|
|
|
be part of and included in the registration statement as of the
earlier of the date such form of prospectus is first used after
effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of
securities in the offering described in the prospectus. As
provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer
and any person that is at that date an underwriter, such date
shall be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration
statement relating to the securities in the registration
statement to which that prospectus relates, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof, provided, however, that no
statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is
part of the registration statement or made in a document
incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the
registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of
contract of sale prior to such effective date, supersede or
modify any statement that was made in the registration statement
or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or
made in any such document immediately prior to such effective
date. |
|
|
|
|
(6) |
That, for the purpose of determining liability of the
Registrants under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in
the initial distribution of the securities: The undersigned
Registrants undertake that in a primary offering of securities
of the undersigned Registrants pursuant to this registration
statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell
the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered
or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following
communications, the undersigned Registrants will be a seller to
the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such
securities to such purchaser: |
|
|
|
|
(i) |
Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned
Registrants relating to the offering required to be filed
pursuant to Rule 424; |
|
|
(ii) |
Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by
or on behalf of the undersigned Registrants or used or referred
to by the undersigned Registrants; |
|
|
(iii) |
The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the
offering containing material information about the undersigned
Registrants or its securities provided by or on behalf of the
undersigned registrant; and |
|
|
(iv) |
Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by
the undersigned Registrants to the purchaser. |
|
|
|
|
(7) |
That, for purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each filing of the Registrants annual
report pursuant to section 13(a) or section 15(d) of
the Exchange Act (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plans annual report pursuant to
section 15(d) of the Exchange Act) that is incorporated by
reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a
new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
|
|
(8) |
To file an application for the purpose of determining the
eligibility of the trustee to act under
subsection (a) of Section 310 of the TIA in
accordance with the rules and regulations prescribed by the
Commission under Section 305(b)(2) of the TIA. |
|
|
(9) |
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the Registrants, the Registrants have
been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the Registrants in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the Registrants will, unless, in
the opinion of their counsel, the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. |
II-11
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
city of Paris, France, on January 29, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Brunck |
|
Chairman of the Board |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert
Brunck, Michel Ponthus, Thierry Le Roux, Jonathan Miller and
Stephane-Paul Frydman, and each of them acting individually as
his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full and several power of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign on his or her
behalf any or all amendments, (including post-effective
amendments) and supplements to this registration statement and
any registration statements filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 relating thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Robert Brunck
Robert
Brunck |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Jonathan Miller
Jonathan
Miller |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive
officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Kay Pratt
Kay
Pratt |
|
Treasurer (Principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Michel Ponthus
Michel
Ponthus |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Thierry Le Roux
Thierry
Le Roux |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Christophe Pettenati-Auzière
Christophe
Pettenati-Auzière |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Gérard Chambovet
Gérard
Chambovet |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
city of Nantes, France, on January 29, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Pascal Rouiller |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Michel
Ponthus, Pascal Rouiller, Kenneth O. Fitts, George Wood and
Stephane-Paul Frydman, and each of them acting individually as
his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full and several power of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign on his or her
behalf any or all amendments, (including post-effective
amendments) and supplements to this registration statement and
any registration statements filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 relating thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Pascal Rouiller
Pascal
Rouiller |
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive officer) and
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Kenneth O. Fitts
Kenneth
O. Fitts |
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal financial officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Bill Demko
Bill
Demko |
|
Controller (Principal accounting officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Thierry Le Roux
Thierry
Le Roux |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Pascal Rouiller
Pascal
Rouiller |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Pierre Baliguet
Pierre
Baliguet |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ George Wood
George
Wood |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Kenneth O. Fitts
Kenneth
O. Fitts |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
city of Houston, Texas, United States, on January 29, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Thierry Le Roux |
|
Chairman of the Board |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Thierry
Le Roux, Timothy Wells, Vincent Thielen, Michel Ponthus,
and Stephane-Paul Frydman, and each of them acting individually
as his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full and several power of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign on his or her
behalf any or all amendments, (including post-effective
amendments) and supplements to this registration statement and
any registration statements filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 relating thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Thierry Le Roux
Thierry
Le Roux |
|
Chairman of the Board, Vice-President and Director (Principal
executive officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Vincent Thielen
Vincent
Thielen |
|
Treasurer (Principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Christophe Pettenati
Christophe
Pettenati |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Timothy L. Wells
Timothy
L. Wells |
|
Director and President |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Stephane-Paul Frydman
Stephane-Paul
Frydman |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Brent Whiteley
Brent
Whiteley |
|
Company secretary |
|
January 29, 2007 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
city of Houston, Texas, United States, on January 29, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy L. Wells |
|
President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Timothy
L. Wells, Vincent Thielen and Brent Whiteley, and each of them
acting individually as his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full and several power of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign on his or her
behalf any or all amendments, (including post-effective
amendments) and supplements to this registration statement and
any registration statements filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 relating thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Timothy L. Wells
Timothy
L. Wells |
|
President and Director (Principal executive officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Vincent Thielen
Vincent
Thielen |
|
Treasurer and Director (Principal financial and accounting
officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Brent Whiteley
Brent
Whiteley |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
city of Houston, Texas, United States, on January 29, 2007.
|
|
|
Veritas Geophysical
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy L. Wells |
|
President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Timothy
L. Wells, Vincent Thielen and Brent Whiteley, and each of them
acting individually as his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full and several power of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign on his or her
behalf any or all amendments, (including post-effective
amendments) and supplements to this registration statement and
any registration statements filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 relating thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Timothy L. Wells
Timothy
L. Wells |
|
President and Director (Principal executive officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Vincent Thielen
Vincent
Thielen |
|
Treasurer and Director (Principal financial and accounting
officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Brent Whiteley
Brent
Whiteley |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
city of Houston, Texas, United States, on January 29, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy L. Wells |
|
President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Timothy
L. Wells, Vincent Thielen and Brent Whiteley, and each of them
acting individually as his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full and several power of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign on his or her
behalf any or all amendments, (including post-effective
amendments) and supplements to this registration statement and
any registration statements filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 relating thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Timothy L. Wells
Timothy
L. Wells |
|
President and Director
(Principal executive officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Vincent Thielen
Vincent
Thielen |
|
Treasurer and Director (Principal financial and accounting
officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Brent Whiteley
Brent
Whiteley |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
city of Houston, Texas, United States, on January 29, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy L. Wells |
|
President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Timothy
L. Wells, Vincent Thielen and Brent Whiteley, and each of them
acting individually as his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full and several power of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign on his or her
behalf any or all amendments, (including post-effective
amendments) and supplements to this registration statement and
any registration statements filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 relating thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Timothy L. Wells
Timothy
L. Wells |
|
President and Director
(Principal executive officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Vincent Thielen
Vincent
Thielen |
|
Treasurer and Director (Principal financial and accounting
officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Brent Whiteley
Brent
Whiteley |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
city of Houston, Texas, United States, on January 29, 2007.
|
|
|
Veritas Geophysical
(Mexico) Llc
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy L. Wells |
|
President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Timothy
L. Wells, Vincent Thielen and Brent Whiteley, and each of them
acting individually as his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full and several power of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign on his or her
behalf any or all amendments, (including post-effective
amendments) and supplements to this registration statement and
any registration statements filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 relating thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Timothy L. Wells
Timothy
L. Wells |
|
President and Director
(Principal executive officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Vincent Thielen
Vincent
Thielen |
|
Treasurer and Director (Principal financial and accounting
officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Brent Whiteley
Brent
Whiteley |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
city of Houston, Texas, United States, on January 29, 2007.
|
|
|
Veritas Dgc Asia Pacific
Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy L. Wells |
|
President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Timothy
L. Wells, Vincent Thielen and Brent Whiteley, and each of them
acting individually as his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full and several power of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign on his or her
behalf any or all amendments, (including post-effective
amendments) and supplements to this registration statement and
any registration statements filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 relating thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Timothy L. Wells
Timothy
L. Wells |
|
President and Director
(Principal executive officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Vincent Thielen
Vincent
Thielen |
|
Treasurer and Director (Principal financial and accounting
officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Brent Whiteley
Brent
Whiteley |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
city of Houston, Texas, United States, on January 29, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy L. Wells |
|
President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Timothy
L. Wells, Vincent Thielen and Brent Whiteley, and each of them
acting individually as his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full and several power of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign on his or her
behalf any or all amendments, (including post-effective
amendments) and supplements to this registration statement and
any registration statements filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 relating thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said
attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Timothy L. Wells
Timothy
L. Wells |
|
President and Director
(Principal executive officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Vincent Thielen
Vincent
Thielen |
|
Treasurer and Director (Principal financial and accounting
officer) |
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Brent Whiteley
Brent
Whiteley |
|
Director |
|
January 29, 2007 |