e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-33280
HFF, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
51-0610340 |
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One Oxford Centre |
|
|
301 Grant Street, Suite 600 |
|
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15219 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(412) 281-8714
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant
outstanding as of October 30, 2009 was 16,538,830 shares.
HFF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
September 30, 2009
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which reflect our
current views with respect to, among other things, our operations and financial performance. You
can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as outlook, believes,
expects, potential, continues, may, will, should, seeks, approximately, predicts,
intends, plans, estimates, anticipates or the negative version of these words or other
comparable words. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties.
Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to
differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe these factors include, but
are not limited to, those described under Risk Factors. These factors should not be construed as
exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or
otherwise.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING THE REGISTRANT
In connection with our initial public offering of our Class A common stock in February 2007,
we effected a reorganization of our business, which had previously been conducted through HFF
Holdings LLC (HFF Holdings) and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Holliday
Fenoglio Fowler, L.P. and HFF Securities L.P. (together, the Operating Partnerships) and Holliday
GP Corp. (Holliday GP). In the reorganization, HFF, Inc., a newly-formed Delaware corporation,
purchased from HFF Holdings all of the shares of Holliday GP, which is the sole general partner of
each of the Operating Partnerships, and approximately 45% of the partnership units in each of the
Operating Partnerships (including partnership units in the Operating Partnerships held by Holliday
GP) in exchange for the net proceeds from the initial public offering and one share of Class B
common stock of HFF, Inc. Following this reorganization and as of the closing of the initial public
offering on February 5, 2007, HFF, Inc. is a holding company holding partnership units in the
Operating Partnerships and all of the outstanding shares of Holliday GP. HFF Holdings and HFF,
Inc., through their wholly-owned subsidiaries, are the only limited partners of the Operating
Partnerships. We refer to these transactions collectively in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as
the Reorganization Transactions. Unless we state otherwise, the information in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q gives effect to these Reorganization Transactions.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to (1) HFF Holdings refer solely to HFF
Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was previously the holding company for our
consolidated subsidiaries, and not to any of its subsidiaries, (2) HFF LP refer to Holliday
Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, (3) HFF Securities refer to HFF Securities
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and registered broker-dealer, (4) Holliday GP refer to
Holliday GP Corp., a Delaware corporation and the general partner of HFF LP and HFF Securities, (5)
HoldCo LLC refer to HFF Partnership Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of HFF, Inc., and (6) Holdings Sub refer to HFF LP Acquisition LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of HFF Holdings. Our business
operations are conducted by HFF LP and HFF Securities, which are sometimes referred to in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Operating Partnerships. Also, except where specifically
noted, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Company, we or us mean HFF,
Inc., the newly-formed Delaware corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect
to the Reorganization Transactions.
3
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
35,380 |
|
|
$ |
37,028 |
|
Restricted cash (Note 7) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
Mortgage notes receivable (Note 8) |
|
|
11,224 |
|
|
|
16,300 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
5,569 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
2,038 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets, net |
|
|
51,214 |
|
|
|
62,430 |
|
Property and equipment, net (Note 4) |
|
|
4,433 |
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
123,495 |
|
|
|
123,848 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
3,712 |
|
Intangible assets, net (Note 5) |
|
|
7,629 |
|
|
|
7,649 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
190,915 |
|
|
$ |
203,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 7) |
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
Warehouse line of credit (Note 8) |
|
|
11,224 |
|
|
|
16,300 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
4,676 |
|
|
|
5,321 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
Payable to affiliate (Note 16) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
20,020 |
|
|
|
25,506 |
|
Deferred rent credit |
|
|
3,390 |
|
|
|
3,793 |
|
Payable to HFF Holdings TRA, less current portion (Note 12) |
|
|
104,336 |
|
|
|
108,287 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion (Note 7) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
128,111 |
|
|
|
137,766 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 175,000,000 authorized, and 16,538,830 and
16,446,480 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 1 share authorized, and 1 share outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
27,119 |
|
|
|
26,206 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
10,474 |
|
|
|
12,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total parent stockholders equity |
|
|
37,585 |
|
|
|
39,126 |
|
Noncontrolling interest (Note 13) |
|
|
25,219 |
|
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
62,804 |
|
|
|
65,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
190,915 |
|
|
$ |
203,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
19,483 |
|
|
$ |
29,441 |
|
|
$ |
46,381 |
|
|
$ |
103,003 |
|
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
Other |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,612 |
|
|
|
31,034 |
|
|
|
50,273 |
|
|
|
106,803 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
12,185 |
|
|
|
20,014 |
|
|
|
33,069 |
|
|
|
69,365 |
|
Personnel |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
4,835 |
|
|
|
7,018 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
5,689 |
|
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
4,855 |
|
Supplies, research, and printing |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
5,841 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
Interest on warehouse line of credit |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,772 |
|
|
|
31,132 |
|
|
|
57,369 |
|
|
|
105,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income / (loss) |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(7,096 |
) |
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
3,775 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Decrease in payable under the tax receivable agreement |
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income / (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
(2,453 |
) |
|
|
9,412 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
4,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income / (loss) |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
(3,526 |
) |
|
|
4,579 |
|
Net income / (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
4,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share of Class A common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
(Dollars in Thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Treasury Stock |
|
Paid in |
|
Accumulated other |
|
Retained |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
Earnings |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
16,446,480 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,206 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,756 |
|
|
$ |
26,500 |
|
|
$ |
65,626 |
|
Stock compensation and other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
913 |
|
Issuance of Class A common stock |
|
|
172,399 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Repurchase of Class A common stock |
|
|
(80,049 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
80,049 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Net (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,282 |
) |
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
(3,526 |
) |
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, September 30, 2009 |
|
|
16,538,830 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
|
80,049 |
|
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
$ |
27,119 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,474 |
|
|
$ |
25,219 |
|
|
$ |
62,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Treasury Stock |
|
Paid in |
|
Accumulated other |
|
Retained |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
Earnings |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
16,445,000 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,353 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,527 |
|
|
$ |
21,784 |
|
|
$ |
59,828 |
|
Stock compensation and other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683 |
|
Issuance of Class A common stock |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gain on investments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
4,149 |
|
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
16,446,480 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,036 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
12,957 |
|
|
$ |
25,871 |
|
|
$ |
65,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income |
|
$ |
(3,526 |
) |
|
$ |
4,579 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) / income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
Amortization of investment security discounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
7,506 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Payable under the tax receivable agreement |
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
|
|
(3,862 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
Gain on sale or disposition of assets, net |
|
|
(2,417 |
) |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
Mortgage service rights assumed |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Receivable from /payable to affiliates |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Payable to Holdings TRA |
|
|
(2,258 |
) |
|
|
(5,257 |
) |
Deferred taxes, net |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
5,076 |
|
|
|
(59,256 |
) |
Net borrowings on warehouse line of credit |
|
|
(5,076 |
) |
|
|
59,256 |
|
Prepaid taxes, prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
(4,610 |
) |
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
(4,596 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1,096 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(1,279 |
) |
|
|
(6,704 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Purchase of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(10,168 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash |
|
|
(1,648 |
) |
|
|
(16,999 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
37,028 |
|
|
|
43,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
35,380 |
|
|
$ |
26,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
7
HFF, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
HFF, Inc., through its Operating Partnerships, Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., a Texas limited
partnership (HFF LP) and HFF Securities L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and registered
broker-dealer (HFF Securities and together with HFF LP, the Operating Partnerships), is a
commercial real estate financial intermediary that provides commercial real estate and capital
markets services including debt placement, investment sales, structured finance and private equity
placements, investment banking and advisory services, loan sales and loan sale advisory services,
commercial loan servicing and commercial real estate and capital markets advice through its 17
offices in the United States.
HFF LP was acquired on June 16, 2003 and accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 805, Business Combinations.(ASC 805). The total purchase price of $8.8 million
was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the
date of acquisition.
During 2004, HFF LP and Holliday GP Corp., a Delaware corporation (Holliday GP), formed HFF
Securities. HFF Securities is a broker-dealer that performs private placements of securities by
raising equity capital from institutional investors for discretionary, commingled real estate funds
to execute real estate acquisitions, recapitalizations, developments, debt investments and other
real estate-related strategies. HFF Securities may also provide other investment banking and
advisory services on various project or entity-level strategic assignments such as mergers and
acquisitions, sales and divestitures, recapitalizations and restructurings, privatizations,
management buyouts and arranging joint ventures for specific real estate strategies.
Offering and Reorganization
HFF, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), was formed in November 2006 in connection with a
proposed initial public offering of its Class A common stock. On November 9, 2006, HFF, Inc. filed
a registration statement on Form S-1 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) relating to a proposed underwritten initial public offering of 14,300,000 shares of Class A
common stock of HFF, Inc. (the Offering). On January 30, 2007, the SEC declared the registration
statement on Form S-1 effective and the Company priced 14,300,000 shares for the initial public
offering at a price of $18.00 per share. On January 31, 2007, the Companys common stock began
trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol HF.
The proceeds of the initial public offering were used to purchase from HFF Holdings LLC (HFF
Holdings) all of the shares of Holliday GP and purchase from HFF Holdings partnership units
representing approximately 39% of each of the Operating Partnerships (including partnership units
in the Operating Partnerships held by Holliday GP).
On February 21, 2007, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase an additional 2,145,000
shares of Class A common stock (15% of original issuance) at $18.00 per share. These proceeds were
used to purchase HFF Holdings partnership units representing approximately 6.0% of each of the
Operating Partnerships. The Company did not retain any of the proceeds from the Offering.
In addition to cash received for its sale of all of the shares of Holliday GP and approximately 45%
of partnership units of each of the Operating Partnerships (including partnership units in the
Operating Partnerships held by Holliday GP), HFF Holdings also received an exchange right that
permits HFF Holdings to exchange interests in the Operating Partnerships for shares of (i) HFF,
Inc.s Class A common stock (the Exchange Right) and (ii) rights under a tax receivable agreement
between the Company and HFF Holdings (the tax receivable agreement). See Note 13 for further
discussion of the Exchange Right and Notes 12 and 17 for further discussion of the tax receivable
agreement.
As a result of the reorganization, the Company became a holding company through a series of
transactions pursuant to a sale and merger agreement. Pursuant to the Offering and reorganization,
HFF, Inc.s sole assets are through its wholly-owned subsidiary HFF Partnership Holdings, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (HoldCo LLC), partnership interests in HFF LP and HFF
Securities and all of the shares of Holliday GP. The transactions that occurred in connection with
the initial public offering and reorganization are referred to as the Reorganization
Transactions.
8
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September
30, 2008, include the accounts of HFF LP, HFF Securities, and HFF, Inc.s wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Holliday GP and HoldCo LLC. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated.
The purchase of shares of Holliday GP and partnership units in each of the Operating Partnerships
are treated as reorganization under common control for financial reporting purposes. HFF Holdings
owned 100% of Holliday GP, HFF LP Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Holdings
Sub), and the Operating Partnerships prior to the Reorganization Transactions and continues to
control these entities through HFF, Inc. The initial purchase of shares of Holliday GP and the
initial purchase of units in the Operating Partnerships were accounted for at historical cost, with
no change in basis for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the net assets of HFF Holdings
purchased by HFF, Inc. are reported in the consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. at HFF
Holdings historical cost.
As the sole stockholder of Holliday GP (the sole general partner of the Operating Partnerships),
HFF, Inc. now operates and controls all of the business and affairs of the Operating Partnerships.
HFF, Inc. consolidates the financial results of the Operating Partnerships, and the ownership
interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating Partnerships is treated as a noncontrolling interest in
HFF, Inc.s consolidated financial statements. HFF Holdings, through its wholly-owned subsidiary
(Holdings Sub), and HFF, Inc., through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (HoldCo LLC and Holliday GP),
are the only partners of the Operating Partnerships following the Reorganization Transactions.
Effective July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) established the
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) as the primary source of authoritative accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied to
nongovernmental entities. Although the establishment of the ASC did not change current GAAP, it
did change the way the Company refers to GAAP throughout this document to reflect the updated
referencing convention.
Reclassifications
Certain items in the consolidated financial statements of prior years have been reclassified to
conform to the current years presentation.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
These interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial
information, the instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and
should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008. Accordingly, significant accounting policies and disclosures normally provided have been
omitted as such items are disclosed therein. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
consisting of normal and recurring entries considered necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are
based on information available as of the date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates. Furthermore, operating results for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results
expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
Consolidation
HFF Inc. controls the activities of the operating partnerships through its 100% ownership interest
of Holliday GP. As such, in accordance with ASC 810 Consolidation, Holliday GP consolidates the
Operating Partnerships as Holliday GP is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnerships and
the limited partners do not have substantive participating rights or kick out rights. The ownership
interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating Partnerships is reflected as noncontrolling interest in
HFF, Inc.s consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September
30, 2008, include the accounts of HFF LP, HFF Securities, and HFF, Inc.s wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Holliday GP and HoldCo LLC. The ownership interest of HFF Holdings in HFF LP and HFF
9
Securities is treated as a noncontrolling interest in the consolidated financial statements of HFF,
Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Income Taxes
HFF, Inc. and Holliday GP are corporations, and the Operating Partnerships are limited
partnerships. The Operating Partnerships are subject to state and local income taxes. Income and
expenses of the Operating Partnerships have been passed through and are reported on the individual
tax returns of the members of HFF Holdings and on the corporate income tax returns of HFF, Inc. and
Holliday GP. Income taxes shown on the Companys consolidated statements of income reflect federal
income taxes of the corporation and business and corporate income taxes in various jurisdictions.
These taxes are assessed on the net income of the corporation, including its share of the Operating
Partnerships net income.
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases, and for tax losses and tax credit carryforwards, if any. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates will be recognized in income in the period of the tax rate
change. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Earnings Per Share
Subsequent to the Reorganization Transactions, the Company computes net income per share in
accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Basic net income per share is computed by dividing
income available to Class A common stockholders by the weighted average of shares of Class A common
stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the assumed conversion of
all dilutive securities (see Note 15).
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include mortgage servicing rights under agreements with third-party lenders,
costs associated with obtaining a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) license, a
non-compete agreement and deferred financing costs.
Servicing rights are capitalized for servicing assumed on loans originated and sold to the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) with servicing retained. Prior to January 1, 2007,
servicing rights were recorded based on an allocation of the carrying amount of the loan and the
servicing right in proportion to the relative fair values at the date of sale. Servicing rights are
subsequently recorded at the lower of cost or market. Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an
active, open market with readily available observable prices. Since there is no ready market value
for the mortgage servicing rights, such as quoted market prices or prices based on sales or
purchases of similar assets, the Company determines the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights
by estimating the present value of future cash flows associated with servicing the loans.
Management makes certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the fair value of servicing
rights. The estimate is based on a number of assumptions, including the benefits of servicing
(contractual servicing fees and interest on escrow and float balances), the cost of servicing,
prepayment rates (including risk of default), an inflation rate, the expected life of the cash
flows and the discount rate. The cost of servicing and discount rate are the most sensitive factors
affecting the estimated fair value of the servicing rights. Management estimates a market
participants cost of servicing by analyzing the limited market activity and considering the
Companys own internal servicing costs. Management estimates the discount rate by considering the
various risks involved in the future cash flows of the underlying loans which include the
cancellation of servicing contracts, concentration in the life company portfolio and the
incremental risk related to large loans. Management estimates the prepayment levels of the
underlying mortgages by analyzing recent historical experience. Many of the commercial loans being
serviced have financial penalties for prepayment or early payoff before the stated maturity date.
As a result, the Company has consistently experienced a low level of loan runoff. The estimated
value of the servicing rights is impacted by changes in these assumptions.
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of the ASC 860, Transfers and
Servicing. ASC 860 requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability at
fair value each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a
servicing contract, regardless of whether explicit consideration is exchanged. The statement also
permits a company to choose to either subsequently measure servicing rights at fair value and to
report changes in fair value in earnings, or to retain the amortization method whereby servicing
rights are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value and are amortized over their expected life.
10
The Company retained the amortization method upon adoption of ASC 860, but began recognizing the
fair value of servicing contracts involving no consideration assumed after January 1, 2007, which
resulted in the Company recording $0.3 million and $0.6 million of intangible assets and a
corresponding amount to income upon initial recognition of the servicing rights for the three and
nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The Company recorded $0.5 million and
$1.1 million of intangible assets and a corresponding amount to income upon initial recognition of
the servicing rights for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
The Company recorded $0.0 million and $0.1 million servicing right liability and a corresponding
amount to expense upon initial recognition of the servicing right during the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Both the income and expense recognized from
servicing rights are recorded in Interest and other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Deferred financing costs are deferred and are being amortized by the straight-line method (which
approximates the effective interest method) over four years.
The Company entered into a non-compete agreement for $0.1 million during February 2008. This
non-compete agreement is being amortized by the straight-line method over three years.
HFF Securities has recognized an intangible asset in the amount of $0.1 million for the costs of
obtaining a FINRA license as a broker-dealer. The license is determined to have an indefinite
useful economic life and is, therefore, not being amortized.
The Company evaluates amortizable intangible assets on an annual basis, or more frequently if
circumstances so indicate, for potential impairment. Indicators of impairment monitored by
management include a decline in the level of serviced loans.
Stock Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted ASC 718, Compensation Stock Compensation (ASC
718), using the modified prospective method. Under this method, the Company recognizes compensation
costs based on grant-date fair value for all share-based awards granted, modified or settled after
January 1, 2006, as well as for any awards that were granted prior to the adoption for which
requisite service has not been provided as of January 1, 2006. The Company did not grant any
share-based awards prior to January 31, 2007. ASC 718 requires the measurement and recognition of
compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors including
employee stock options and other forms of equity compensation based on estimated fair values. The
Company estimates the grant-date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. For restricted stock awards, the fair value of the awards is calculated as the difference
between the market value of the Companys Class A common stock on the date of grant and the
purchase price paid by the employee. The Companys awards are generally subject to graded vesting
schedules. Compensation expense is adjusted for estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Forfeiture assumptions are
evaluated on a quarterly basis and updated as necessary.
Investments
From time to time, the Company may invest in available-for-sale securities such as United States
Treasury Bills. These investments are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices in active
markets for identical instruments. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based
upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets. These investments may be classified
as current or long-term assets and are included in Investments or Other noncurrent assets,
respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on managements ability or intention to sell
the investment. The amortization of the discount is recognized as income based on the effective
interest method and is recorded in Interest and other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of
Income. The unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale are included net of tax in
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized
gains or losses on these securities are computed on a specific-identification basis and recognized
in Interest and other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company did not
have any investments as of September 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
On a periodic basis, management evaluates the carrying value of investments for impairment. With
respect to the investments in United States Treasury Bills, management considers various criteria,
including the duration and extent of a decline in fair value and the ability and intent of
management to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow the value to recover
to determine whether a decline in fair value is other than temporary. If, after considering these
criteria, management believes that a decline is other than temporary, the carrying value of the
security is written down to fair value and recognized in Interest and other income, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Income.
11
Comprehensive Income
The Company reports all changes in comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Equity, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 220, Comprehensive Income.
Comprehensive income includes net income and unrealized gains and losses on securities available
for sale, net of tax.
Comprehensive loss was $(0.0) million and $(2.3) million for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, and income of $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for
the same periods of 2008.
Treasury Stock
The Company records common stock purchased for treasury at cost. At the date of subsequent
reissue, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock on the first-in, first-out
basis.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FAS 167),
which requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable
interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. FAS
167 is effective for fiscal periods ending after November 15, 2009. The adoption of FAS 167 is not
expected to have a material impact on the Company. Prior to adoption, the Company will evaluate
the impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (as codified in ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing (ASC
860)). This update to ASC 860 removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and
removes the exception from applying ASC 810 to qualifying special-purpose entities. FSP FAS 166 is
effective for fiscal periods ending after November 15, 2009. The adoption of the amended guidance
is not expected to have a material impact on the Company.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASC 820), to provide additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of
transaction activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to normal
market activity for the asset or liability. ASC 820 also provides additional guidance on
circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. The amended guidance was
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the
amended guidance had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 825, Financial Instruments (ASC 825), which
extends the disclosure requirements of the fair value of financial instruments to interim financial
statements. The amended guidance was effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009. The adoption of the amended guidance had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
In April 2008, the FASB issued an update to ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (ASC 350),
which amended the factors to be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. This amended guidance was effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 14, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
The Company adopted the provision of this standard on January 1, 2009, which did not have a
material impact on the Company.
In December 2007, the FASB issued an update to ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC 810), which changes the
accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be characterized as noncontrolling
interests and classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method significantly
changes the accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. The Company adopted the
provisions of this standard on January 1, 2009, which resulted in a significant change to total
equity, as the noncontrolling interest had been previously classified outside of equity.
3. Stock Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted ASC 718 using the modified prospective method. Under
this method, the Company recognizes compensation costs based on grant-date fair value for all
share-based awards granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2006,
12
as well as for any awards that were granted prior to the adoption for which requisite service
has not been provided as of January 1, 2006. The Company did not grant any share-based awards prior
to January 31, 2007. ASC 718 requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for
all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and
other forms of equity compensation based on estimated fair values. The Company estimates the
grant-date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For restricted
stock awards, the fair value of the awards is calculated as the difference between the market value
of the Companys Class A common stock on the date of grant and the purchase price paid by the
employee. The Companys awards are generally subject to graded vesting schedules. Compensation
expense is adjusted for estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period of the award. Forfeiture assumptions are evaluated on a quarterly basis
and updated as necessary. During the three month period ending September 30, 2009, 2,084 of vested
restricted stock units were converted to Class A common stock and 35,168 new restricted stock units
were granted. During the three month period ending September 30, 2009, no stock options were
granted and no stock options were forfeited.
The stock compensation cost that has been charged against income for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 was $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, which is recorded in
Personnel expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The stock compensation cost that has
been charged against income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 was $0.4
million and $0.7 million, respectively. At September 30, 2009, there was approximately $0.9 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to share based awards.
No options vested or were exercised during the three months ended September 30, 2009.
The fair value of vested restricted stock units was $0.5 million at September 30, 2009.
The weighted average remaining contractual term of the nonvested restricted stock units is
approximately 2 years as of September 30, 2009.
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
|
$ |
3,419 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
Capitalized software costs |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
5,953 |
|
|
|
6,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
11,083 |
|
|
|
10,987 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(6,650 |
) |
|
|
(5,693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,433 |
|
|
$ |
5,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 the Company has recorded, within furniture and equipment, office equipment
under capital leases of $0.5 million, including accumulated amortization of $0.3 million, which is
included within depreciation and amortization expense on the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Income. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has recorded office equipment under capital leases
of $0.3 million, including accumulated amortization of $0.2 million. See Note 7 for discussion of
the related capital lease obligations.
13
5. Intangible Assets
The Companys intangible assets are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
11,203 |
|
|
$ |
(3,769 |
) |
|
$ |
7,434 |
|
|
$ |
9,716 |
|
|
$ |
(2,405 |
) |
|
$ |
7,311 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
170 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
Unamortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINRA license |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
11,926 |
|
|
$ |
(4,297 |
) |
|
$ |
7,629 |
|
|
$ |
10,439 |
|
|
$ |
(2,790 |
) |
|
$ |
7,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company serviced $24.7 billion and $24.5
billion, respectively, of commercial loans. The Company earned $2.8 million and $8.1 million in
servicing fees and interest on float and escrow balances for the three and nine month periods
ending September 30, 2009, respectively. The Company earned $3.5 million and $9.5 million in
servicing fees and interest on float and escrow balances for the three and nine month periods
ending September 30, 2008, respectively. These revenues are recorded as capital markets services
revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The total commercial loan servicing portfolio includes loans for which there are no corresponding
mortgage servicing rights recorded on the balance sheet, as these servicing rights were assumed
prior to January 1, 2007 and involved no initial consideration paid by the Company. The Company has
recorded mortgage servicing rights of $7.4 million and $7.3 million on $11.9 billion and $11.1
billion, respectively, of the total loans serviced as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The Company stratifies its servicing portfolio based on the type of loan, including life company
loans, commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS), Freddie Mac and limited-service life company
loans.
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily available observable
prices. Since there is no ready market value for the mortgage servicing rights, such as quoted
market prices or prices based on sales or purchases of similar assets, the Company determines the
fair value of the mortgage servicing rights by estimating the present value of future cash flows
associated with the servicing of the loans. Management makes certain assumptions and judgments in
estimating the fair value of servicing rights. The estimate is based on a number of assumptions,
including the benefits of servicing (contractual servicing fees and interest on escrow and float
balances), the cost of servicing, prepayment rates (including risk of default), an inflation rate,
the expected life of the cash flows and the discount rate. The significant assumptions utilized to
value servicing rights as of September 30, 2009 are as follows:
Expected life of cash flows: 3 years to 10 years
Discount rate(1): 15% 20%
Prepayment rate: 0% 8%
Inflation rate: 2%
Cost to service: $1,600 $4,220
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the time value of money and the risk of future cash flows related to the possible
cancellation of servicing contracts, transferability restrictions on certain servicing
contracts, concentration in the life company portfolio and large loan risk. |
The above assumptions are subject to change based on managements judgments and estimates of future
changes in the risks related to future cash flows and interest rates. Changes in these factors
would cause a corresponding increase or decrease in the prepayment rates and discount rates used in
our valuation model.
14
Changes in the carrying value of mortgage servicing rights for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the fair value at the end of each period were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FV at |
|
Category |
|
12/31/08 |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Sold |
|
|
9/30/09 |
|
|
9/30/09 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
3,266 |
|
|
$ |
1,317 |
|
|
$ |
(580 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,003 |
|
|
$ |
4,497 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
Life company |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
Life company limited |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
|
$ |
(1,389 |
) |
|
$ |
(442 |
) |
|
$ |
7,434 |
|
|
$ |
8,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FV at |
|
Category |
|
12/31/07 |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Sold |
|
|
9/30/08 |
|
|
9/30/08 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
2,183 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
(620 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
Life company |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
Life company limited |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,343 |
|
|
$ |
2,699 |
|
|
$ |
(1,230 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,812 |
|
|
$ |
7,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts capitalized represent mortgage servicing rights retained upon the sale of originated loans
to Freddie Mac and mortgage servicing rights acquired without the exchange of initial
consideration. The Company recorded mortgage servicing rights retained upon the sale of originated
loans to Freddie Mac of $0.5 million and $1.3 million on $131.3 million and $398.2 million of
loans, respectively, during the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2009 and $1.0
million and $1.6 million on $270.0 million and $496.7 million of loans, respectively, during the
three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2008. The Company recorded mortgage servicing
rights acquired without the exchange of initial consideration of $0.3 million and $0.6 million on
$392.8 million and $778.9 million of loans, respectively, during the three and nine month periods
ending September 30, 2009 and $0.5 million and $1.1 million on $939.2 million and $2.3 billion of
loans, respectively, during the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2008. In June
2009, the Company sold mortgage servicing rights with a net book value of $0.4 million and
recognized a gain on sale of $1.1 million which is recorded in Interest and other income, net in
the consolidated financial statements. The Company recorded a mortgage servicing liability of $0.1
million, included in other long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, on
$146.4 million of loans, during the three month period ending March 31, 2009. These amounts are
recorded in Interest and Other Income, net in the consolidated statements of income.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $0.5 million and $1.5 million during the
three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $0.7 million and $1.4
million during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, respectively, which is
recorded in Depreciation and Amortization in the consolidated statements of income.
See Note 2 for further discussion regarding treatment of servicing rights prior to January 1, 2007.
Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
521 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,720 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,275 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,021 |
|
2013 |
|
|
922 |
|
2014 |
|
|
833 |
|
The weighted-average life of the mortgage servicing rights intangible asset was 6.3 years at
September 30, 2009. The remaining lives of the deferred financing costs and non-compete agreement
intangible assets were 0.3 and 1.3 years, respectively, at September 30, 2009.
6. Fair Value Measurement
The Company adopted ASC 820 as of January 1, 2008. ASC 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy for
disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the
inputs into the following three levels: Level 1 inputs which are quoted market prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs which are observable market-based
inputs or
15
unobservable inputs corroborated by market data for the asset or liability; and Level 3 inputs
which are unobservable inputs based on managements assumptions that are not corroborated by market
data. A financial asset or liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on
the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities recognized at fair
value on a recurring basis.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, from time to time, the Company
measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets may include mortgage
servicing rights and mortgage notes receivable. The mortgage servicing rights were not measured at
fair value during the third quarter of 2009 as the Company continues to utilize the amortization
method under ASC 860 and the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights exceeds the carrying value
at September 30, 2009. See Note 5 for further discussion on the assumptions used in valuing the
mortgage servicing rights and impact on earnings during the period. The fair value of the mortgage
notes receivable was based on prices observable in the market for similar loans and equaled
carrying value at September 30, 2009. Therefore, no lower of cost or fair value adjustment was
required.
7. Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Bank term note payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The Credit Agreement
On February 5, 2007, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of
America (Amended Credit Agreement). The Amended Credit Agreement is comprised of a $40.0 million
revolving credit facility, which replaced the old Credit Agreement that was paid off in connection
with the initial public offering. The Amended Credit Agreement matures on February 5, 2010 and may
be extended for one year based on certain conditions as defined in the agreement. Interest on
outstanding balances is payable at the applicable LIBOR rate (for interest periods of one, two,
three, six or twelve months) plus 200 basis points, 175 basis points or 150 basis points (such rate
is determined from time to time in accordance with the Amended Credit Agreement, based on our then
applicable consolidated leverage ratio) or at interest equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds
Rate (0.07% at September 30, 2009) plus 0.5% and (b) the Prime Rate (3.25% at September 30, 2009)
plus 1.5%. The Amended Credit Agreement also requires payment of a commitment fee of 0.2% or 0.3%
on the unused amount of credit based on the total amount outstanding. During the three months ended
June 30, 2009, the Company corrected an error related to previously unrecorded commitment fees on
its unused line of credit and recorded approximately $260,000 of interest expense that represented
the cumulative amount of commitment fees on its unused line for the period from February 5, 2007 to
March 31, 2009. This correction was not considered material to restate prior period financial
statements. The Company did not borrow on this revolving credit facility during the period
February 5, 2007 through September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, based on Availability, as
defined under the Amended Credit Agreement as three times the difference of Consolidated EBITDA, as
defined therein, and Consolidated Fixed Charges, as defined therein, the Company did not have any
Availability, as defined therein, of the $40.0 million in undrawn line of credit available under
this facility. In addition, the financial covenants under the Amended Credit Agreement currently
require us to maintain a maximum leverage ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to Consolidated
EBITDA, each as defined therein, and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of Consolidated EBITDA
to Consolidated Fixed Charges, each as defined therein. On August 5, 2009, the Company entered into
a waiver agreement with Bank of America that waives the financial requirements of the maximum
leverage ratio and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio for the three month periods ending June 30,
2009, September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009. The Company will not have any Availability under
the Amended Credit Agreement during the waiver period unless the Company is able to regain
compliance with the financial covenants. On June 27, 2008, the Company entered into an amendment
to the Amended Credit Agreement to modify the calculation of the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio, as defined therein, as it relates to the Quarterly Tax Distributions, as defined therein,
and to modify certain annual and quarterly reporting obligations of HFF LP under the Amended Credit
Agreement. On October 30, 2007, the Company entered into an amendment to the Amended Credit
Agreement to clarify that the $40.0 million line of credit under the Amended Credit Agreement, to
the extent otherwise available to the Company, is available to the Company for purposes of
originating such Freddie Mac loans (see discussion under Note 8 below).
16
(b) Letters of Credit and Capital Lease Obligations
At each September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of
approximately $0.2 million with the same bank as the revolving credit arrangements as security for
two leases. The Company segregated cash in a separate bank account to collateralize the letters of
credit. The letters of credit expire through 2010 but can be extended for one year.
Capital lease obligations consist primarily of office equipment leases that expire at various dates
through June 2012 and bear interest at rates ranging from 2.99% to 9.50%. A summary of future
minimum lease payments under capital leases at September 30, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
2010 |
|
|
135 |
|
2011 |
|
|
75 |
|
2012 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Warehouse Line of Credit
In 2005, HFF LP obtained an uncommitted, unlimited warehouse line of credit for the purpose of
funding the Freddie Mac mortgage loans that it originates through Red Mortgage Capital, Inc. (Red
Capital). In October 2007, this warehouse line was limited to $150.0 million. In November 2007,
the Company entered into an uncommitted $50.0 million line of credit note with The Huntington Bank
to serve as a supplement to the existing warehouse line of credit with Red Capital. The Company
also is permitted to use borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement, to the extent the Company
otherwise has Availability, as defined under the Amended Credit Agreement, to originate and
subsequently sell mortgages in connection with the Companys participation in Freddie Macs
Multifamily Program Plus ® Seller/Servicer program. At present, the Company has no Availability
under the Amended Credit Agreement.
Each funding is separately approved on a transaction-by-transaction basis and is collateralized by
a loan and mortgage on a multifamily property that is ultimately purchased by Freddie Mac. As of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, HFF LP had $11.2 million and $16.3 million, respectively,
outstanding on the warehouse lines of credit with Red Capital and The Huntington Bank and a
corresponding amount of mortgage notes receivable. The Company did not borrow under the Amended
Credit Agreement in connection with funding the Freddie Mac mortgage loans that it originates or
otherwise during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 or during the year ending
December 31, 2008. Interest on the warehouse lines of credit is at the 30-day LIBOR rate (0.247%
and 1.08% at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) plus a spread. HFF LP is also
paid interest on its loan secured by a multifamily loan at the rate in the Freddie Mac note.
9. Lease Commitments
The Company leases various corporate offices, parking spaces and office equipment under
noncancelable operating leases. These leases have initial terms of 1.0 to 10.6 years. Several
office leases have termination clauses whereby the term may be reduced by two to seven years upon
prior notice and payment of a termination fee by the Company. Total rental expense charged to
operations was $1.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively, during the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2009 and $1.4 million and $4.3 million, respectively, during the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2008.
Future minimum rental payments for the next five years under operating leases with noncancelable
terms in excess of one year and without regard to early termination provisions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
2010 |
|
|
4,672 |
|
2011 |
|
|
4,116 |
|
2012 |
|
|
4,023 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,926 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,428 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
17
From time to time the Company subleases certain office space to subtenants, some of which may be
canceled at any time. The rental income received from these subleases is included as a reduction of
occupancy expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company also leases certain office equipment under capital leases that expire at various dates
through 2012. See Note 4 and Note 7 above for further description of the assets and related
obligations recorded under these capital leases at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
HFF Holdings is not an obligor, nor does it guarantee any of the Companys leases.
10. Servicing
The Company services commercial real estate loans for investors. The unpaid principal balance of
the servicing portfolio totaled $24.7 billion and $24.5 billion at September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively.
In connection with its servicing activities, the Company holds funds in escrow for the benefit of
mortgagors for hazard insurance, real estate taxes and other financing arrangements. At September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the funds held in escrow totaled $93.2 million and $96.9 million,
respectively. These funds, and the offsetting liabilities, are not presented in the Companys
consolidated financial statements as they do not represent the assets and liabilities of the
Company. Pursuant to the requirements of the various investors for which the Company services
loans, the Company maintains bank accounts, holding escrow funds, which have balances in excess of
the FDIC insurance limit. The fees earned on these escrow funds are reported in capital markets
services revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
11. Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to various litigation matters, in most cases involving ordinary course and
routine claims incidental to its business. The Company cannot estimate with certainty its ultimate
legal and financial liability with respect to any pending matters. In accordance with ASC 450,
Contingencies, a reserve for estimated losses is recorded when the amount is probable and can be
reasonably estimated. However, the Company believes, based on examination of such pending matters,
that its ultimate liability will not have a material adverse effect on its business or financial
condition.
12. Income Taxes
Income tax expense / (benefit) includes current and deferred taxes as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
(835 |
) |
|
$ |
(712 |
) |
State |
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
$ |
1,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
(2,086 |
) |
|
$ |
6,659 |
|
|
$ |
4,573 |
|
State |
|
|
(587 |
) |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,673 |
) |
|
$ |
7,506 |
|
|
$ |
4,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
The reconciliation between the income tax computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate and
the effective tax rate on net (loss) / income is as follows for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Pre-tax book (loss) / income |
|
$ |
(2,453 |
) |
|
$ |
9,412 |
|
Less: pre-tax (loss) / income allocated to noncontrolling interest holder |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax book (loss) / income after noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
(1,221 |
) |
|
$ |
5,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Income tax (benefit) / expense |
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Taxes computed at federal rate |
|
$ |
(415 |
) |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,823 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Change in income tax benefit payable to stockholder |
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
(27.8 |
)% |
Effect of deferred tax rate change |
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
(167.6 |
)% |
|
|
4,879 |
|
|
|
91.0 |
% |
Effect on change in valuation allowance |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
)% |
Stock compensation |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(12.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Adjustment for prior years taxes |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Meals and entertainment |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
(11.6 |
)% |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Other |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
1,073 |
|
|
|
(87.9 |
)% |
|
$ |
4,833 |
|
|
|
90.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, included
income tax expense of $12,000 and a benefit of $0.1 million of state and local taxes on income
allocated to the noncontrolling interest holder, which represents 1.0% and 1.8% of the total
effective rate, respectively.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Deferred income tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 754 election tax basis step-up |
|
$ |
128,615 |
|
|
$ |
136,478 |
|
Tenant improvements |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
10,394 |
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
Tax credits |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Compensation |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
Other |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,278 |
|
|
|
141,614 |
|
Less: valuation allowance |
|
|
(14,738 |
) |
|
|
(15,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax asset |
|
|
125,540 |
|
|
|
125,884 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
Servicing rights |
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
(1,220 |
) |
Deferred rent |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liability |
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
|
(1,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
$ |
123,635 |
|
|
$ |
124,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In evaluating the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management makes estimates and
judgments regarding the level and timing of future taxable income, including reviewing
forward-looking analyses. Based on this analysis and other quantitative and qualitative factors,
management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to generate
sufficient taxable income to realize a portion of the deferred tax assets resulting from the
initial basis step up recognized from the Reorganization Transaction. Deferred tax assets
representing the tax benefits to be realized when future payments are made to HFF Holdings under a
tax receivable agreement are currently not more likely than not to be realized and, therefore, have
a valuation allowance of $14.7 million recorded against them. See discussion under the caption Tax
Receivable Agreement below for further information regarding the Companys tax receivable
agreement with HFF Holdings. The effects of changes in this initial valuation allowance will be
recorded in equity if managements future analysis determines that it is more likely than not that
these benefits will be realized. All other effects of changes
19
in the Companys estimates regarding the realization of the deferred tax assets will be included in
net income. Similarly, the effect of subsequent changes in the enacted tax rates will be included
in net income.
In June 2006, the FASB issued an update to ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740). The amended guidance
prescribes recognition and measurement standards for a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with ASC 740 is a two-step process.
The first step is the determination of whether a tax position should be recognized. Under ASC 740,
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return is to be recognized only if the
Company determines that it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained upon
examination by the tax authorities based upon the technical merits of the position. In step two,
for those tax positions which should be recognized, the measurement of a tax position is determined
as being the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon
effective settlement. The Company adopted the amended guidance on January 1, 2007, the effect of
which was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. The Company has determined that no
unrecognized tax benefits need to be recorded as of September 30, 2009.
The Company will recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in Interest
and other income, net. There were no interest or penalties recorded in the three and nine month
periods ending September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Tax Receivable Agreement
In connection with the Reorganization Transactions, HFF LP and HFF Securities made an election
under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code for 2007, and intend to keep that election in effect
for each taxable year in which an exchange of partnership units for shares occurs. The initial sale
as a result of the offering increased the tax basis of the assets owned by HFF LP and HFF
Securities to their fair market value. This increase in tax basis allows the Company to reduce the
amount of future tax payments to the extent that the Company has future taxable income. As a result
of the increase in tax basis, the Company is entitled to future tax benefits of approximately
$128.6 million and has recorded this amount as a deferred tax asset on its Consolidated Balance
Sheet. The Company has updated its estimate of these future tax benefits based on the changes to
the estimated annual effective tax rate for 2008. The Company is obligated, however, pursuant to
its tax receivable agreement with HFF Holdings, to pay to HFF Holdings 85% of the amount of cash
savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that the Company actually realizes as
a result of these increases in tax basis and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from
the Company entering into the tax receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement.
For purposes of the tax receivable agreement, actual cash savings in income tax will be computed by
comparing the Companys actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have
been required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of HFF LP and HFF
Securities as a result of the initial sale and later exchanges had the Company not entered into the
tax receivable agreement.
The Company accounts for the income tax effects and corresponding tax receivable agreement effects
as a result of the initial purchase and the sale of units of the Operating Partnerships in
connection with the Reorganization Transactions and future exchanges of Operating Partnership units
for the Companys Class A shares by recognizing a deferred tax asset for the estimated income tax
effects of the increase in the tax basis of the assets owned by the Operating Partnerships, based
on enacted tax rates at the date of the transaction, less any tax valuation allowance the Company
believes is required. In accordance with ASC 740, the tax effects of transactions with shareholders
that result in changes in the tax basis of a companys assets and liabilities will be recognized in
equity. If transactions with shareholders result in the recognition of deferred tax assets from
changes in the Companys tax basis of assets and liabilities, the valuation allowance initially
required upon recognition of these deferred assets will be recorded in equity. Subsequent changes
in enacted tax rates or any valuation allowance are recorded as a component of income tax expense.
The Company believes it is more likely than not that it will realize a portion of the benefit
represented by the deferred tax asset, and, therefore, the Company recorded 85% of this estimated
amount of the increase in deferred tax assets as a liability to HFF Holdings under the tax
receivable agreement and the remaining 15% of the increase in deferred tax assets directly in
additional paid-in capital in stockholders equity. However, deferred tax assets representing the
tax benefits to be realized when future payments are made to HFF Holdings under the tax receivable
agreement are currently not likely to be realized and, therefore, have a valuation allowance of
$14.7 million recorded against them.
While the actual amount and timing of payments under the tax receivable agreement will depend upon
a number of factors, including the amount and timing of taxable income generated in the future,
changes in future tax rates, the value of individual assets, the portion of the Companys payments
under the tax receivable agreement constituting imputed interest and increases in the tax basis of
the Companys assets resulting in payments to HFF Holdings, the Company has estimated that the
payments that will be made to HFF Holdings will be $104.3 million and has recorded this obligation
to HFF Holdings as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In conjunction with the filing
of the Companys 2008 federal and state tax returns, the benefit for 2008 relating to the Section
754 basis
20
step-up was finalized, resulting in $2.7 million in tax benefits realized by the Company for 2008.
As discussed above, the Company is obligated to remit to HFF Holdings 85% of any such cash savings
in U.S. federal and state taxes. As such, during August 2009, the Company paid $2.3 million to HFF
Holdings under this tax receivable agreement. In addition, during the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009, the tax rates used to measure the deferred tax assets were updated, which
resulted in a reduction of deferred tax assets of $2.0 million, which in turn resulted in a
reduction in the payable under the tax receivable agreement of $1.7 million. In conjunction with
the filing of the Companys 2007 federal and state tax returns, the benefit for 2007 relating to
the Section 754 basis step-up was finalized resulting in $6.2 million in tax benefits in 2007. As
such, during August 2008, the Company paid $5.3 million to HFF Holdings under this tax receivable
agreement. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2008, the tax rates used to measure the
deferred tax assets were updated which resulted in a reduction of deferred tax assets of $4.6
million, which resulted in a reduction in the payable under the tax receivable agreement of $3.9
million. To the extent the Company does not realize all of the tax benefits in future years, this
liability to HFF Holdings may be reduced.
13. Noncontrolling Interest
The noncontrolling interest recorded in the consolidated financial statements relates to the
ownership interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating Partnerships. As a result of the Reorganization
Transactions discussed in Note 1, partners capital was eliminated from equity and noncontrolling
interest of $6.4 million was recorded representing HFF Holdings remaining interest in the
Operating Partnerships. The table below sets forth the noncontrolling interest amount recorded
during the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income / (loss) from operating partnerships |
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
$ |
2,413 |
|
|
$ |
(2,249 |
) |
|
$ |
7,501 |
|
Noncontrolling interest ownership percentage |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
|
$ |
1,335 |
|
|
$ |
(1,244 |
) |
|
$ |
4,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the Reorganization Transactions, HFF Holdings beneficially owns 20,355,000
partnership units in each of the Operating Partnerships. Pursuant to the terms of the HFF, Inc.s
amended and restated certificate of incorporation, HFF Holdings can from time to time exchange its
partnership units in the Operating Partnerships for shares of the Companys Class A common stock on
the basis of two partnership units, one for each Operating Partnership, for one share of Class A
common stock, subject to customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends
and reclassifications. The following table reflects the exchangeability of HFF Holdings rights to
exchange its partnership units in the Operating Partnerships for shares of the Companys Class A
common stock, pursuant to contractual provisions in the HFF Holdings operating agreement. However,
these contractual provisions may be waived, amended or terminated by a vote of the members holding
65% of the interests of HFF Holdings following consultation with the Companys Board of Directors.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, HFF, Inc.s amended and restated certificate of incorporation
provides that no holder of Operating Partnership units is entitled to exchange its Operating
Partnership units for shares of Class A common stock if such exchange would be prohibited under
applicable federal or state securities laws or regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of HFF |
|
|
Number of Additional |
|
Holdings |
|
|
Shares of Class A |
|
Partnership Units in |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
the Operating |
|
|
Expected to Become |
|
Partnerships |
|
|
Available for |
|
Becoming Eligible |
Exchangeability Date: |
|
Exchange |
|
for Exchange |
|
|
|
January 31, 2009 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
January 31, 2011 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
January 31, 2012 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
20,355,000 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
If all of the partnership units held by HFF Holdings were exchanged for shares of Class A common
stock of HFF, Inc. on September 30, 2009, 20,355,000 shares of Class A common stock with a fair
value of $138.6 million would be issued.
On September 30, 2009, a Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the offering and sale from
time to time by the members of HFF Holdings of such 20,355,000 shares of Class A common stock
became effective. As of November 6, 2009, none of the 20,355,000 partnership units in each of the
Operating Partnerships beneficially owned by HFF Holdings immediately following the Reorganization
Transactions had been exchanged for shares of HFF, Inc.s Class A common stock pursuant to the
Exchange Right.
21
HFF Holdings was issued one share of the Companys Class B common stock. The Class B common stock
has no economic rights but entitles the holder to a number of votes that is equal to the total
number of shares of Class A common stock for which the partnership units that such holder holds at
such time in the Operating Partnerships are exchangeable.
14. Stockholders Equity
The Company is authorized to issue 175,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, and one share of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share. Each share of Class A
common stock entitles its holder to one vote on all matters to be voted on by stockholders
generally. HFF Holdings has been issued one share of Class B common stock. Class B common stock has
no economic rights but entitles the holder to a number of votes equal to the total number of shares
of Class A common stock for which the partnership units that HFF Holdings holds in the Operating
Partnerships, as of the relevant record date for the HFF, Inc. stockholder action, are
exchangeable. Holders of Class A and Class B common stock will vote together as a single class on
all matters presented to the Companys stockholders for their vote or approval. The Company has
issued 16,538,830 and 16,446,480 shares of Class A common stock and 1 share of Class B common stock
as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
15. Earnings Per Share
The Companys net income and weighted average shares outstanding for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net income / (loss) |
|
$ |
1,289 |
|
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
|
$ |
(3,526 |
) |
|
$ |
4,579 |
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
|
$ |
430 |
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
16,599,358 |
|
|
|
16,481,786 |
|
|
|
16,588,043 |
|
|
|
16,464,731 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
16,599,421 |
|
|
|
16,481,786 |
|
|
|
16,588,043 |
|
|
|
16,464,731 |
|
The calculations of basic and diluted net income per share amounts for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are described and presented below.
Basic Net Income per Share
Numerator net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Denominator the weighted average shares of Class A common stock for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, including 71,574 and 47,730 restricted stock units that
have vested and whose issuance is no longer contingent as of September 30, 2009 and September 30,
2008, respectively.
22
Diluted Net Income per Share
Numerator net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 as in the basic net income per share calculation
described above plus net (loss) / income allocated to noncontrolling interest holder upon assumed
exercise of the Exchange Right by HFF Holdings.
Denominator the weighted average shares of Class A common stock for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, including 71,574 and 47,730 restricted stock units that
have vested and whose issuance is no longer contingent as of September 30, 2009 and September 30,
2008, respectively, plus the dilutive effect of the unrestricted stock units, stock options, and
the issuance of Class A common stock upon exercise of the Exchange Right by HFF Holdings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Basic Earnings Per Share of Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
|
$ |
430 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock
outstanding |
|
|
16,599,358 |
|
|
|
16,481,786 |
|
|
|
16,588,043 |
|
|
|
16,464,731 |
|
Basic net income per share of Class A common stock |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income / (loss) attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
|
$ |
430 |
|
Adddilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to noncontrolling interest holder upon
assumed exercise of the Exchange Right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock |
|
|
16,599,358 |
|
|
|
16,481,786 |
|
|
|
16,588,043 |
|
|
|
16,464,731 |
|
Adddilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest holder Exchange Right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
16,599,421 |
|
|
|
16,481,786 |
|
|
|
16,588,043 |
|
|
|
16,464,731 |
|
Diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
16. Related Party Transactions
The Company made payments on behalf of two affiliates of $454 and $34,957, respectively, during the
nine month period ended September 30, 2009. The Company made payments on behalf of two affiliates
of $14,363 and $38,917, respectively, during the nine month period ended September 30, 2008. The
Company had a net payable to affiliates of approximately $56,000 and $92,000 at September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively.
As a result of the Companys initial public offering, the Company entered into a tax receivable
agreement with HFF Holdings that provides for the payment by the Company to HFF Holdings of 85% of
the amount of the cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that the
Company actually realizes as a result of the increase in tax basis of the assets owned by HFF LP
and HFF Securities and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from entering into the tax
receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement. The Company will retain the
remaining 15% of cash savings, if any, in income tax that it realizes. For purposes of the tax
receivable agreement, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing the Companys actual
income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have been required to pay had there
been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of HFF LP and HFF Securities allocable to the
Company as a result of the initial sale and later exchanges and had the Company not entered into
the tax receivable agreement. The term of the tax receivable agreement commenced upon consummation
of the offering and will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or have expired.
See Note 12 for further information regarding the tax receivable agreement and Note 17 for the
amount recorded in relation to this agreement.
23
17. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is obligated, pursuant to its tax receivable agreement with HFF Holdings, to pay to HFF
Holdings 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax
that the Company actually realizes as a result of the increases in tax basis under Section 754 and
as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from the Company entering into the tax receivable
agreement and making payments under that agreement. The Company has recorded $104.3 million for
this obligation to HFF Holdings as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September
30, 2009.
From time to time the Company enters into employment agreements with transaction professionals.
Some of these agreements include payments to be made to the transaction professional at a specific
time, if certain conditions have been met. The Company accrues for these payments over the life of
the agreement. The Company has recorded $0.3 million for these employment agreements as a
liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2009.
18. Subsequent Events
On October 22, 2009, the Company received gross proceeds of approximately $0.5 million for the sale
of a portion of the mortgage servicing rights on four loans.
On October 28, 2009, the Company granted 1,180 restricted stock units which vested immediately with
a fair value of $7,233 million on the grant date. Additionally, on October 28, 2009, the Company
granted 7,335 stock options with a contractual term of 13 years and a fair value of $30,000 on
grant date.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through November 6, 2009, the date which these
financial statements were issued.
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion summarizes the financial position of HFF, Inc. and its subsidiaries
as of September 30, 2009, and the results of our operations for the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2009, and should be read in conjunction with (i) the unaudited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
(ii) the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Overview
Our Business
We are one of the leading providers of commercial real estate and capital markets services to
the U.S. commercial real estate industry based on transaction volume and are one of the largest
full-service commercial real estate financial intermediaries in the country.
Substantially all of our revenues are in the form of capital markets services fees collected
from our clients, usually negotiated on a transaction-by-transaction basis. We also earn fees from
commercial loan servicing activities. We believe that our multiple product offerings, diverse
client mix, expertise in a wide range of property types and national platform create a stable and
diversified revenue stream.
We operate in one reportable segment, the commercial real estate financial intermediary
segment, and offer debt placement, investment sales, distressed debt and real estate owned advisory
service, structured finance, equity placement, investment banking services, loan sales and
commercial loan servicing.
Our business may be significantly affected by factors outside of our control, particularly
including:
|
|
Economic and commercial real estate market downturns. Our business is dependent on favorable
international and domestic economic conditions and the demand for commercial real estate and
related services in the markets in which we operate. A slow down, a significant downturn
and/or recession in either the global economy and/or the domestic economy, which is currently
the case and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future (including but not limited to
even a regional economic downturn) could adversely affect the performance of commercial real
estate as well as our business, as is currently the case and is expected to continue for the
foreseeable future. A general decline in acquisition and disposition activity can lead to a
reduction in fees and commissions for arranging such transactions, as well as in fees and
commissions for arranging financing for acquirers and property owners that are seeking to
recapitalize their existing properties, as is currently the case and is expected to continue
for the foreseeable future. Likewise, a general decline in commercial real estate investment
activity can lead to a reduction in fees and commissions for arranging acquisitions,
dispositions and financings for acquisitions as well as for recapitalizations for existing
property owners and a significant reduction in our loan servicing activities (due to increased
delinquencies and defaults and lack of additional loans that we would have otherwise added to
our loan servicing portfolio) all of which would have an adverse effect on our business, as is
currently the case and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. |
|
|
|
Global and domestic credit write-offs, losses and liquidity issues. Global and domestic
credit write-offs, losses and liquidity issues could have and have led to an economic downturn
and are expected to continue to have a negative impact on already weak economic conditions,
continuing the economic downturn and economic conditions, including but not limited to a
commercial real estate market downturn, which in turn has led to a decrease in transaction
activity and lower values, all of which are expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
The current situation in the global credit markets whereby many world governments (including
but not limited to the U.S., where the Company transacts virtually all of its business) have
had to take unprecedented and uncharted steps to either support the financial institutions in
their respective countries from collapse or take direct ownership of same is unprecedented in
the Companys history. Write-offs, losses and current restrictions on the availability of
capital to the broad market as a whole, both debt and/or equity, have created significant
reductions in capital available for commercial real estate and could further reduce the
liquidity in and flow of capital to the commercial real estate markets, as is currently the
case and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. These write-offs, losses and
restrictions could also cause commercial real estate prices to decrease as is currently the
case and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. In particular, global and
domestic write-offs, losses and credit and liquidity issues as well as price declines in the
debt and equity markets may reduce the number of acquisitions, dispositions and loan
originations, as well as the respective number of transactions and transaction volumes, which
|
25
|
|
could also adversely affect our capital markets services revenues including our servicing
revenue, as is currently the case and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. |
|
|
|
Decreased investment allocation to commercial real estate class. Allocations to commercial
real estate as an asset class for investment portfolio diversification may decrease for a
number of reasons beyond our control, including but not limited to poor performance of the
asset class relative to other asset classes or superior performance of other asset classes
when compared with continued good performance of the commercial real estate asset class, or
the poor performance of all assets classes. In addition, while commercial real estate is now
viewed as an accepted and valid class for portfolio diversification, if this perception
changes, there could be a significant reduction in the amount of debt and equity capital
available in the commercial real estate sector. In particular, reductions in debt and/or
equity allocations to commercial real estate may reduce the number of acquisitions,
dispositions and loan originations, as well as the respective number of transactions and
transaction volumes, which could also adversely affect our capital markets services revenues
including our servicing revenue, as is currently the case and is expected to continue for the
foreseeable future. |
|
|
|
Fluctuations in interest rates. Significant fluctuations in interest rates as well as steady
and protracted movements of interest rates in one direction (increases or decreases) could
adversely affect the operation and income of commercial real estate properties as well as the
demand from investors for commercial real estate investments. Both of these events could
adversely affect investor demand and the supply of capital for debt and equity investments in
commercial real estate. In particular, increased interest rates may cause prices to decrease
due to the increased costs of obtaining financing and could lead to decreases in purchase and
sale activities, thereby reducing the amounts of investment sales and loan originations and
related servicing fees. If our investment sales origination and servicing businesses are
negatively impacted, it is likely that our other lines of business would also suffer due to
the relationship among our various capital markets services. |
The factors discussed above have affected and continue to be a risk to our business as
evidenced by the significant disruptions in the global capital and credit markets, especially in
the domestic capital markets. In particular, global and domestic credit and liquidity issues
coupled with an economic downturn and recession in many parts of the world economies, especially
here in the U.S., have significantly reduced the number of acquisitions, dispositions and loan
originations, as well as the respective number of transactions and transaction volumes during 2008
and the first nine months of 2009, and these conditions are likely to continue to reduce the number
of transactions and transaction volumes for the foreseeable future. This has had and may continue
to have a significant adverse effect on our capital markets services revenues for the foreseeable
future. The significant balance sheet issues of many of the CMBS lenders, banks, life insurance
companies, captive finance companies and other financial institutions have adversely affected and
will likely continue to adversely affect the flow of commercial mortgage debt to the U.S. capital
markets and can potentially adversely affect all of our capital markets services platforms and
resulting revenues, all of which are expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
The ongoing economic slowdown and/or domestic and global economic recession also continue to
be a risk, which is expected to continue for the foreseeable future, not only due to the potential
negative adverse impacts on the performance of U.S. commercial real estate markets as these markets
tend to lag general economic conditions, but also to the ability of lenders and equity investors, many of
whom have experienced significant and unprecedented losses and/or impairments to their portfolios,
to generate significant profits and capital to continue to make loans and equity investments in the
commercial real estate market, especially in the U.S. where we operate.
Other factors that may adversely affect our business are discussed under the heading
Forward-Looking Statements and under the caption Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
26
Results of Operations
Following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended September
30, 2009 and September 30, 2008. The table included in the period comparisons below provides
summaries of our results of operations. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are
not necessarily indicative of future results. For a description of the key financial measures and
indicators included in our consolidated financial statements, refer to the discussion under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Key
Financial Measures and Indicators in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, unless percentages) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
19,483 |
|
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
$ |
29,441 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
% |
|
$ |
(9,958 |
) |
|
|
(33.8 |
)% |
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
Other |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
(62.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
20,612 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
31,034 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(10,422 |
) |
|
|
(33.6 |
)% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
12,185 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
% |
|
|
20,014 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
% |
|
|
(7,829 |
) |
|
|
(39.1 |
)% |
Personnel |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(34.0 |
)% |
Occupancy |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
(41.6 |
)% |
Supplies, research and printing |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
(73.6 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
4,535 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
(1,283 |
) |
|
|
(28.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
19,772 |
|
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
|
31,132 |
|
|
|
100.3 |
% |
|
|
(11,360 |
) |
|
|
(36.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income / (loss) |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
938 |
|
|
NM | |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
|
(50.2 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Decrease in payable under tax receivable agreement |
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
500.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
67.7 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
|
472.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
(22.3 |
)% |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(364 |
) |
|
|
(112.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM Not Meaningful
Revenues. Our total revenues were $20.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to $31.0 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $10.4 million, or 33.6%.
Revenues decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in production volumes in several of our
capital markets services platforms brought about, in significant part, by the unprecedented
disruptions, write-offs and credit losses in the global and domestic capital and credit markets
coupled with a continuing slowing economy and/or recession, both globally and domestically.
The revenues we generated from capital markets services for the three months ended September 30,
2009 decreased $10.0 million, or 33.8%, to $19.5 million from $29.4 million for the same period in
2008. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in both the number and the average
dollar value of transactions closed during the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter
of 2008, brought about in significant part, by the unprecedented disruptions, write-offs and credit
losses in the global and domestic capital and credit markets coupled with a continuing slowing
economy and/or recession, both globally and domestically.
27
|
|
The revenues derived from interest on mortgage notes receivable were $0.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2008, an
increase of $0.1 million. Revenues increased primarily as a result of increased volume of
Freddie Mac loans in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
The other revenues we earned, which consists of expense reimbursements from clients related
to out-of-pocket costs incurred, were approximately $0.3 million for the three month period
ended September 30, 2009 and $0.9 million for the three month period ending September 30,
2008, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 62.5%. Other revenues decreased primarily as a result of
the decrease in production volumes. |
Total Operating Expenses. Our total operating expenses were $19.8 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to $31.1 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $11.4
million, or 36.5%. Expenses decreased primarily due to decreased cost of services due to a decrease
in capital markets services revenue, decreased personnel costs primarily due to a decrease in
revenue and decreased travel and entertainment and supplies, research and printing.
|
|
The costs of services for the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased $7.8 million,
or 39.1%, to $12.2 million from $20.0 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is
primarily the result of the decrease in commissions and other incentive compensation directly
related to the decrease in capital markets services revenues. Also contributing to the
decrease in cost of services is the impact of our cost saving initiatives, such as reducing
headcount and suspending the Companys 401(k) matching contribution. Cost of services as a
percentage of capital markets services and other revenues were approximately 61.5% and 66.0%
for the three month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively.
This percentage decrease is primarily attributable to our cost savings initiatives, which
resulted in a relative decrease of our fixed portion of cost of services, such as salaries for
our analysts and fringe benefit costs, that were greater than the relative decrease in our
revenue. |
|
|
|
Personnel expenses that are not directly attributable to providing services to our clients
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased $0.7 million, or 34.0%, to $1.4
million from $2.2 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is primarily related to a
decrease in profit participation expense resulting from the lower operating income during the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and a decrease in salaries due to a lower headcount. |
|
|
|
The stock compensation cost, included in personnel expenses, which has been charged against
income was $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. At September 30, 2009, there was approximately $0.9 million of unrecognized
compensation cost related to share based awards. The weighted average remaining contractual term
of the nonvested restricted stock units is 1.9 years as of September 30, 2009. The weighted
average remaining contractual term of the nonvested options is 11.3 years as of September 30,
2009. |
|
|
|
Occupancy, travel and entertainment, and supplies, research and printing expenses for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased $1.5 million, or 34.2%, to $2.9 million
compared to the same period in 2008. These decreases are primarily due to decreased supplies,
research and printing and travel and entertainment costs stemming from the decrease in capital
markets services revenues and the impact of our cost saving initiatives. |
|
|
|
Other expenses, including costs for insurance, professional fees, depreciation and
amortization, interest on our warehouse line of credit and other operating expenses, were $3.3
million in the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $1.3 million, or 28.3%,
versus $4.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily
related to decreased depreciation and amortization of $0.2 million, decreased marketing and
advertising expense of $0.1 million, decreased postage and delivery costs of $0.1 million and
a decrease in professional fees of $0.3 million. |
Net Income. Our net income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $1.3 million, a
decrease of $0.4 million versus income of $1.7 million for the same fiscal period in 2008. We
attribute this decrease to several factors, with the most significant cause being a decrease of
revenues of $10.4 million.
|
|
Interest and other income, net for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $0.9
million, a decrease of $0.9 million as compared to $1.8 million for the same fiscal period in
2008. This decrease is primarily due to decreased income on mortgage servicing rights of $0.7
million and lower interest income on our cash balances of $0.2 million. |
28
|
|
The interest expense we incurred in the three months ended September 30, 2009 totaled
$51,000, an increase of $47,000 from $4,000 of similar expenses incurred in the three months
ended September 30, 2008. This increase is primarily due to the recording of the unused
commitment fee on the unused amount of credit on our Amended Credit Agreement, which was not
recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2008 due to a since corrected recording
error. |
|
|
|
Income tax expense was approximately $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009, as compared to $0.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008. This increase
is primarily due to the change in rates used to measure the deferred tax assets. During the
three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a current income tax expense of
approximately $0.4 million and deferred income tax expense of approximately $1.7 million. |
Following is a discussion of our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and September 30, 2008. The table included in the period comparisons below provides summaries
of our results of operations. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not
necessarily indicative of future results. For a description of the key financial measures and
indicators included in our consolidated financial statements, refer to the discussion under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Key
Financial Measures and Indicators in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, unless percentages) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
46,381 |
|
|
|
92.3 |
% |
|
$ |
103,003 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
$ |
(56,622 |
) |
|
|
(55.0 |
)% |
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
|
(36.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
50,273 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
106,803 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(56,530 |
) |
|
|
(52.9 |
)% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
33,069 |
|
|
|
65.8 |
% |
|
|
69,365 |
|
|
|
64.9 |
% |
|
|
(36,296 |
) |
|
|
(52.3 |
)% |
Personnel |
|
|
4,835 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
7,018 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
(2,183 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
)% |
Occupancy |
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
5,689 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
(2,802 |
) |
|
|
(57.7 |
)% |
Supplies, research and printing |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
(4,196 |
) |
|
|
(71.8 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
10,060 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
12,245 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
(2,185 |
) |
|
|
(17.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
57,369 |
|
|
|
114.1 |
% |
|
|
105,013 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
% |
|
|
(47,644 |
) |
|
|
(45.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) / income |
|
|
(7,096 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
)% |
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
(8,886 |
) |
|
|
(496.4 |
)% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
3,775 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
(12.0 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Decrease in payable under the tax receivable agreement |
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
(2,168 |
) |
|
|
(56.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) / income before income taxes |
|
|
(2,453 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
|
|
9,412 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
(11,865 |
) |
|
|
(126.1 |
)% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
4,833 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
(3,760 |
) |
|
|
(77.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income |
|
|
(3,526 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
(8,105 |
) |
|
|
(177.0 |
)% |
Net (loss) / income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
4,149 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
(5,393 |
) |
|
|
(130.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(2,282 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,712 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM Not Meaningful
Revenues. Our total revenues were $50.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to $106.8 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $56.5 million, or 52.9%.
Revenues decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in production volumes in several of our
capital markets services platforms brought about, in significant part, by the unprecedented
disruptions in the global and domestic capital and credit markets coupled with a slowing economy
and/or recession, both globally and domestically.
|
|
The revenues we generated from capital markets services for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 decreased $56.6 million, or 55.0%, to $46.4 million from $103.0 million for the same
period in 2008. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in both the number and
the average dollar value of transactions closed during the first nine months of 2009 compared
to the first nine months of 2008, brought about in significant part, by the unprecedented
disruptions in the global and domestic capital and credit |
29
|
|
markets coupled with a slowing economy and/or recession, both globally and domestically. |
|
|
|
The revenues derived from interest on mortgage notes receivable were $2.4 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $1.4 million for the same period in 2008, an
increase of $1.0 million. Revenues increased primarily as a result of increased volume of
Freddie Mac loans in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008. |
|
|
|
The other revenues we earned, which consist of expense reimbursements from clients related to
out-of-pocket costs incurred, were approximately $1.5 million for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009 and $2.4 million for the nine month period ending September 30, 2008. |
Total Operating Expenses. Our total operating expenses were $57.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to $105.0 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of
$47.6 million, or 45.4%. Expenses decreased primarily due to decreased cost of services and
personnel costs as a result of the decrease in capital markets services revenue and our cost
savings initiatives, and decreased supplies, research and printing, travel and entertainment,
professional fees, postage and delivery costs and marketing and advertising.
|
|
The costs of services for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased $36.3 million,
or 52.3%, to $33.1 million from $69.4 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is
primarily the result of the decrease in commissions and other incentive compensation directly
related to the decrease in capital markets services revenues. Also contributing to the
decrease in cost of services is the impact of our cost saving initiatives, such as reduced
headcount and the suspension of the Companys 401(k) matching contribution. Cost of services
as a percentage of capital markets services and other revenues were approximately 69.1% and
65.8% for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008,
respectively. This percentage increase is primarily attributable to the fixed portion of cost
of services, such as salaries for our analysts and fringe benefit costs, being spread over a
lower revenue base. |
|
|
|
Personnel expenses that are not directly attributable to providing services to our clients
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased approximately $2.2 million, or 31.1%,
to $4.8 million from $7.0 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is primarily
related to a decrease in profit participation expense resulting from the lower operating
income during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and a decrease in salaries due to a
lower headcount. |
|
|
|
The stock compensation cost, included in personnel expenses, which has been charged against
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $0.9 million as compared to $0.7 million
for the same period in 2008. At September 30, 2009, there was approximately $0.9 million of
unrecognized compensation cost related to share based awards. The weighted average remaining
contractual term of the nonvested restricted stock units is 1.9 years as of September 30, 2009.
The weighted average remaining contractual term of the nonvested options is 11.3 years as of
September 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
Occupancy, travel and entertainment, and supplies, research and printing expenses for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased $7.0 million, or 42.6%, to $9.4 million
compared to the same period in 2008. These decreases are primarily due to decreased supplies,
research and printing and travel and entertainment costs stemming from the decrease in capital
markets services revenues and the impact of our cost saving initiatives. |
|
|
|
Other expenses, including costs for insurance, professional fees, depreciation and
amortization, interest on our warehouse line of credit and other operating expenses, were
$10.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $2.2 million, or
17.8%, versus $12.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease is
primarily related to decreases in a number of cost categories such as marketing and
advertising, outsourcing and licensing, postage and delivery charges, professional fees and
other general and administrative costs. These decreases were partially offset by increased
interest on our warehouse lines of credit supporting our Freddie Mac loan business and
increased amortization on our mortgage servicing rights intangible assets. |
30
Net (Loss) / Income.
Our net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
$3.5 million, a decrease of $8.1 million versus net income of $4.6 million for the same fiscal period in
2008. We attribute this decrease to several factors, with the most significant cause being a
decrease of revenues of $56.5 million.
|
|
Interest and other income, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $3.3
million, a decrease of $0.5 million as compared to $3.8 million for the same fiscal period in
2008. This decrease is primarily due to lower interest income earned on our cash balances. |
|
|
|
The interest expense we incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 totaled $0.4
million, an increase of $0.4 million from $15,000 of similar expenses incurred in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. This increase is primarily due to the recording of the unused
commitment fee on the unused amount of credit on our Amended Credit Agreement. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company corrected an error related to previously
unrecorded commitment fees on its unused line of credit and recorded approximately $230,000 of
interest expense that represented the cumulative amount of unused commitment fees for the
period from February 5, 2007 to December 31, 2008 and recorded an additional approximately
$90,000 of expense related to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The prior period
correction was not considered material to restate prior period financial statements. |
|
|
|
Income tax expense was approximately $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease of $3.8 million from income tax expense of $4.8 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily due to the decrease in net operating
income experienced during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period
in the prior year. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a
current income tax expense of approximately $0.5 million and a deferred income tax expense of
approximately $0.5 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company
recorded a current income tax benefit of $2.7 million and a deferred income tax expense of
$7.5 million. |
Financial Condition
Total assets decreased to $190.9 million at September 30, 2009, from $203.4 million at
December 31, 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
A decrease in mortgage notes receivable of $5.1 million due to a lower balance of loans
pending sale to Freddie Mac at September 30, 2009, compared to December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
A decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $1.6 million. |
|
|
|
A decrease in prepaid taxes of $3.5 million primarily due to a refund of federal and state
taxes paid in prior periods. |
|
|
|
A decrease in property and equipment, net of $0.9 million, primarily due to the normal
depreciation on the fixed assets. |
|
|
|
Total liabilities decreased to $128.1 million at September 30, 2009, from $137.8 million at
December 31, 2008, primarily due to: |
|
|
|
A decrease of $5.1 million in the warehouse lines of credit due to a lower balance of loans
pending sale to Freddie Mac at September 30, 2009, compared to December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
A decrease of $4.0 million in the payable under the tax receivable agreement due to the
payment $2.3 million to HFF Holdings of 85% of the cash savings in U.S. federal and state
taxes realized by the Company for 2008 pursuant to the Companys tax receivable agreement with
HFF Holdings. See Notes 12 and 17 to the Companys consolidated financial statements for
further discussion of the tax receivable agreement. Also, in the three months ending
September 30, 2009, we changed the tax rate used to measure our deferred tax assets which
decreased our deferred tax assets by $2.0 million of which 85%, or $1.7 million, decreased the
payable to HFF Holdings under the tax receivable agreement. |
31
Cash Flows
Our historical cash flows are primarily related to the timing of receipt of transaction fees,
the timing of distributions to members of HFF Holdings and payment of commissions and bonuses to
employees.
2009
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $1.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Net cash of $1.3 million was used in operating activities, primarily resulting from a $3.5 million
net loss and a $4.0 million decrease in payable under the tax receivable agreement. These uses of
cash were partially offset by the decrease in deferred taxes of $0.5 million, proceeds from sale of
mortgage servicing rights of $1.6 million and a decrease in prepaid taxes, prepaid expenses and
other current assets of $4.1 million. Cash of $54,000 was used for investing in property and
equipment. Financing activities used $0.1 million of cash for the payments on certain capital
leases and $0.2 million of cash was used to purchase treasury stock.
2008
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $17.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Net cash of $6.7 million was used in operating activities, primarily resulting from a $4.6 million
increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets and a $4.6 million decrease in accrued
compensation and related taxes. These uses of cash were partially offset by the decrease in
deferred taxes of $7.5 million. Cash of $9.9 million was used to purchase a six month United States
Treasury Note and $0.3 million was used for investing in property and equipment and entering into a
non-compete agreement. Financing activities used $0.1 million of cash for the payments on certain
capital leases and distributions to the noncontrolling interest holder.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our current assets typically have consisted primarily of cash and accounts receivable in
relation to earned transaction fees. At September 30, 2009, our cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $35.4 million were invested or held in a mix of money market funds, bank demand
deposit accounts and a three month United States Treasury Note at two financial institutions. Our
liabilities have typically consisted of accounts payable and accrued compensation. We regularly
monitor our liquidity position, including cash level, credit lines, interest and payments on debt,
capital expenditures and other matters relating to liquidity and to compliance with regulatory net
capital requirements. We have historically maintained a line of credit under our revolving credit
facility in excess of anticipated liquidity requirements.
In accordance with the Operating Partnerships partnership agreements, and approval from the
board of directors of HFF, Inc. and Holliday GP (as general partner of the Operating Partnerships),
the Operating Partnerships make quarterly distributions to its partners, including HFF, Inc., based
on taxable income, if any, in an amount sufficient to cover all applicable taxes payable by the
members of HFF Holdings and by us and to cover dividends, if any, declared by the board of
directors. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Operating Partnerships did not make
any such distributions to HFF Holdings. However, we anticipate the Operating Partnerships will make
a distribution of approximately $1.5 million to HFF Holdings during 2009 that is attributable to
taxable income related to 2008. These distributions decrease the noncontrolling interest balance on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Over the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, we used approximately $1.3 million of
cash from operations. Our short-term liquidity needs are typically related to compensation expenses
and other operating expenses such as occupancy, supplies, marketing, professional fees and travel
and entertainment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we incurred approximately $57.4
million in total operating expenses. A large portion of our operating expenses are variable, highly
correlated to our revenue streams and dependent on the collection of transaction fees. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, approximately 32.7% of our operating expenses were variable
expenses. Our cash flow generated from operations historically has been sufficient to enable us to
meet our objectives. However, if the current state of the economy continues to deteriorate at the
rate it did during 2008 and the first nine months of 2009 and the unprecedented conditions in the
domestic and global debt and equity capital markets continue for the foreseeable future and
continue to adversely impact our capital markets services revenues, we may be unable to generate
enough cash flow from operations to meet our operating needs and therefore we could use all or
substantially all of our existing cash reserves on hand to support our operations. Since September
30, 2008, we have eliminated approximately 100 positions and have initiated other cost saving
actions that we anticipate will result in approximately $9.8 million of annual cost savings. We
will continue to evaluate other opportunities for cost savings. We currently believe that cash
flows from operating activities and our existing cash balance will provide adequate liquidity and
are sufficient to meet our working capital needs for the foreseeable future.
32
Our tax receivable agreement with HFF Holdings entered into in connection with our initial
public offering provides for the payment by us to HFF Holdings of 85% of the amount of cash
savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income taxes that we actually realize as a result
of the increases in tax basis and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from our
entering into the tax receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement. We have
estimated that the payments that will be made to HFF Holdings will be $104.3 million. Our liquidity
needs related to our long term obligations are primarily related to our facility leases.
Additionally, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we incurred approximately $5.7 million
in occupancy expenses and approximately $0.4 million in interest expense.
We entered into an Amended Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A. for a new $40.0 million
line of credit that was put in place contemporaneously with the consummation of the initial public
offering. This new credit facility matures on February 5, 2010 and may be extended for one year
based on certain conditions as defined in the agreement. Interest on outstanding balance is payable
at the applicable LIBOR rate (for interest periods of one, two, three, six or twelve months) plus
200 basis points, 175 basis points or 150 basis points (such rate is determined from time to time
in accordance with the Amended Credit Agreement, based on our then applicable consolidated leverage
ratio) or at interest equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate (0.07% at September 30,
2009) plus 0.5% and (b) the Prime Rate (3.25% at September 30, 2009) plus 1.5%. The Amended Credit
Agreement also requires payment of an unused commitment fee of 0.2% or 0.3% on the unused amount of
credit based on the total amount outstanding. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the
Company corrected an error related to previously unrecorded unused commitment fees on its unused
line of credit and recorded $0.3 million of interest expense that represented the cumulative amount
of unused commitment fees for the period from February 5, 2007 to March 31, 2009. This correction
was not considered material to restate prior period financial statements. As of September 30, 2009,
based on Availability, as defined under the Amended Credit Agreement as three times the difference
of Consolidated EBITDA, as defined therein, and Consolidated Fixed Charges, as defined therein, the
Company did not have any Availability of the $40.0 million in undrawn line of credit available
under this facility. In addition, the financial covenants under the Amended Credit Agreement
currently require us to maintain a maximum leverage ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to
Consolidated EBITDA, each as defined therein, and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of
Consolidated EBITDA to Consolidated Fixed Charges, each as defined therein. On August 5, 2009, the
Company entered into a waiver agreement with Bank of America that waives the financial requirements
of the maximum leverage ratio and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio for the three months periods
ending June 30, 2009, September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009. The Company will not have any
Availability under the Amended Credit Agreement during the waiver period unless the Company is able
to regain compliance with the financial covenants. On June 27, 2008, the Company entered into an
amendment to the Amended Credit Agreement to modify the calculation of the Consolidated Fixed
Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined therein, as it relates to the Quarterly Tax Distributions, as
defined therein, and to modify certain annual and quarterly reporting obligations of HFF LP under
the Amended Credit Agreement. The Company did not borrow on this revolving credit facility from its
inception through September 30, 2009.
In 2005, we entered into an uncommitted financing arrangement with Red Mortgage Capital, Inc.
(Red Capital) to fund our Freddie Mac loan closings. Pursuant to this arrangement, Red Capital
funds multifamily Freddie Mac loan closings on a transaction-by-transaction basis, with each loan
being separately collateralized by a loan and mortgage on a multifamily property that is ultimately
purchased by Freddie Mac. On December 31, 2008, National City Corporation, which was the parent
company of Red Capital, was merged with and into The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., which has
also participated and received assistance from the TARP program Although we have not experienced
any material changes with our uncommitted financing arrangement with Red Capital, as of this time
we are unable to determine what impact, if any, this merger transaction may have on our ability to
continue to obtain financing from Red Capital to support our participation in Freddie Macs Program
Plus Seller Servicer Program.
In October 2007, as a result of increases in the volume of the Freddie Mac loans that HFF LP
originates as part of its participation in Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller Servicer program and
recently imposed borrowing limits under the financing arrangement with Red Capital of $150.0
million, we began pursuing alternative financing arrangements to potentially supplement or replace
our existing financing arrangement with Red Capital. On October 30, 2007, we entered into an
amendment to the Amended Credit Agreement to clarify that the $40.0 million line of credit under
the Amended Credit Agreement, to the extent the Company otherwise has Availability, as defined
under the Amended Credit Agreement, is available to us for purposes of originating such Freddie Mac
loans. At this time the Company does not have any Availability under the Amended Credit Agreement.
In addition, in November 2007, we obtained a $50.0 million financing arrangement from The
Huntington National Bank to supplement our Red Capital financing arrangement. The Red Capital and
Huntington National Bank financing arrangements are only for the purpose of supporting our
participation in Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller Servicer program, and cannot be used for any
other purpose. As of September 30, 2009, we had outstanding borrowings of $11.2 million under the
Red Capital/Huntington National Bank arrangements and a corresponding amount of mortgage notes
receivable. The Company did not borrow under the Amended Credit Agreement in connection with
funding the Freddie Mac mortgage loans that it originates or otherwise during the three and nine
months ended
33
September 30, 2009 or during the year ended December 31, 2008. Although we believe that our
current financing arrangements with Red Capital and The Huntington Bank are currently sufficient to
meet our current needs in connection with our participation in Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller
Servicer program, in the event we are not able to secure financing for our Freddie Mac loan
closings, we will cease originating such Freddie Mac loans until we have available financing.
Critical Accounting Policies; Use of Estimates
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. In applying many of these accounting principles, we need to make assumptions, estimates
and/or judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in
our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience
and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These assumptions,
estimates and/or judgments, however, are often subjective and they and our actual results may
change negatively based on changing circumstances or changes in our analyses. If actual amounts are
ultimately different from our estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations
for the period in which the actual amounts become known. We believe the following critical
accounting policies could potentially produce materially different results if we were to change
underlying assumptions, estimates and/or judgments. See the notes to our consolidated financial
statements for a summary of our significant accounting policies.
Goodwill. We evaluate goodwill for potential impairment annually or more frequently if
circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. In this process, we make estimates and
assumptions in order to determine the fair value of the Company. In determining the fair value of
the Company for purposes of evaluating goodwill for impairment, we utilize an enterprise market
capitalization approach. In applying this approach, we use the closing stock price of our Class A
common stock as of the measurement date multiplied by the sum of current outstanding shares and an
estimate of a control premium. As of October 30, 2009, managements analysis indicates that a
greater than 66.0% decline in the estimated enterprise value of the Company may result in the
recorded goodwill being impaired and would require management to measure the amount of the
impairment charge. Goodwill is considered impaired if the recorded book value of goodwill exceeds
the implied fair value of goodwill as determined under this valuation technique. We use our best
judgment and information available to us at the time to perform this review.
Intangible Assets. Our intangible assets primarily include mortgage servicing rights under
agreements with third party lenders. Servicing rights are recorded at the lower of cost or market.
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily available observable
prices. Since there is no ready market value for the mortgage servicing rights, such as quoted
market prices or prices based on sales or purchases of similar assets, the Company determines the
fair value of the mortgage servicing rights by estimating the present value of future cash flows
associated with the servicing the loans. Management makes certain assumptions and judgments in
estimating the fair value of servicing rights. The estimate is based on a number of assumptions,
including the benefits of servicing (contractual servicing fees and interest on escrow and float
balances), the cost of servicing, prepayment rates (including risk of default), an inflation rate,
the expected life of the cash flows and the discount rate. The cost of servicing and discount rates
are the most sensitive factors affecting the estimated fair value of the servicing rights.
Management estimates a market participants cost of servicing by analyzing the limited market
activity and considering the Companys own internal servicing costs. Management estimates the
discount rate by considering the various risks involved in the future cash flows of the underlying
loans which include the cancellation of servicing contracts, concentration in the life company
portfolio and the incremental risk related to large loans. Management estimates the prepayment
levels of the underlying mortgages by analyzing recent historical experience. Many of the
commercial loans being serviced have financial penalties for prepayment or early payoff before the
stated maturity date. As a result, the Company has consistently experienced a low level of loan
runoff. The estimated value of the servicing rights is impacted by changes in these assumptions. As
of September 30, 2009, the fair value and net book value of the servicing rights were $8.6 million
and $7.4 million, respectively. A 10%, 20% and 30% increase in the level of assumed prepayments
would decrease the estimated fair value of the servicing rights at the stratum level by up to 1.7%,
3.4% and 5.0%, respectively. A 10%, 20% and 30% increase in cost of servicing of the servicing
business would decrease the estimated fair value of the servicing rights at the stratum level by up
to 18.4%, 36.8% and 55.1%, respectively. A 10%, 20% and 30% increase in the discount rate would
decrease the estimated fair value of the servicing rights at the stratum level by up to 3.2%, 6.2%
and 9.0%, respectively. The effect of a variation in each of these assumptions on the estimated
fair value of the servicing rights is calculated independently without changing any other
assumption. Servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated
servicing income which results in an accelerated level of amortization over eight years. We
evaluate amortizable intangible assets on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances so
indicate, for potential impairment.
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases, and for tax losses and tax credit carryforwards, if any. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities
34
are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates are recognized in income in the period of the tax rate
change. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Our effective tax rate is sensitive to several factors including changes in the mix of our
geographic profitability. We evaluate our estimated tax rate on a quarterly basis to reflect
changes in: (i) our geographic mix of income, (ii) legislative actions on statutory tax rates, and
(iii) tax planning for jurisdictions affected by double taxation. We continually seek to develop
and implement potential strategies and/or actions that would reduce our overall effective tax rate.
The net deferred tax asset of $123.6 million at September 30, 2009 is comprised mainly of a
$128.6 million deferred tax asset related to the Section 754 election tax basis step up, net of a
$14.7 million valuation allowance. The net deferred tax asset related to the Section 754 election
tax basis step up of $128.6 million represents annual tax deductions of approximately $17.0 million
through 2022. In order to realize the annual benefit of approximately $17.0 million, the Company
needs to generate approximately $150 million in revenue each year, assuming a constant cost
structure. In the event that the Company cannot realize the annual benefit of $17.0 million each
year, the shortfall becomes a net operating loss that can be carried back 2 years to offset prior
years taxable income or carried forward 20 years to offset future taxable income. The Companys
inability to generate a sufficient level of taxable income through the carryforward period would
result in the recording of a valuation allowance as a charge to income tax expense and a
corresponding reduction in the payable under the tax receivable agreement which would be recorded
as income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. In evaluating the realizability of these
deferred tax assets, management makes estimates and judgments regarding the level and timing of
future taxable income, including reviewing forward-looking analyses. Based on this analysis and
other quantitative and qualitative factors, management believes that it is currently more likely
than not that the Company will be able to generate sufficient taxable income to realize a portion
of the deferred tax assets resulting from the initial basis step up recognized from the
Reorganization Transaction.
Leases. The Company leases all of its facilities under operating lease agreements. These lease
agreements typically contain tenant improvement allowances. The Company records tenant improvement
allowances as a leasehold improvement asset, included in property and equipment, net in the
consolidated balance sheet, and a related deferred rent liability and amortizes them on a
straight-line basis over the shorter of the term of the lease or useful life of the asset as
additional depreciation expense and a reduction to rent expense, respectively. Lease agreements
sometimes contain rent escalation clauses or rent holidays, which are recognized on a straight-line
basis over the life of the lease in accordance with ASC 840, Leases (ASC 840). Lease terms
generally range from one to ten years. An analysis is performed on all equipment leases to
determine whether they should be classified as a capital or operating lease according to ASC 840.
Share Based Compensation. The Company estimates the grant-date fair value of stock options
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used in the option
pricing model as of September 30, 2009 are: (i) zero dividend yield, (ii) expected volatility of
59.6%, (iii) risk free interest rate of 3.7% and (iv) expected life of 6.3 years. For restricted
stock awards, the fair value of the awards is calculated as the difference between the market value
of the Companys Class A common stock on the date of grant and the purchase price paid by the
employee. The Companys awards are generally subject to graded vesting schedules. Compensation
expense is adjusted for estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period of the award. Forfeiture assumptions are evaluated on a quarterly basis
and updated as necessary.
Certain Information Concerning Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently invest in any off-balance sheet vehicles that provide liquidity, capital
resources, market or credit risk support, or engage in any leasing activities that expose us to any
liability that is not reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
Seasonality
Our capital markets services revenue has historically been seasonal, which can affect an
investors ability to compare our financial condition and results of operation on a
quarter-by-quarter basis. This seasonality has caused our revenue, operating income, net income and
cash flows from operating activities to be lower in the first six months of the year and higher in
the second half of the year. The typical concentration of earnings and cash flows in the last six
months of the year is due to an industry-wide focus of clients to complete transactions towards the
end of the calendar year. The current disruptions, write-offs and credit losses in the global and
domestic capital markets, the liquidity issues facing all capital markets, especially the U.S.
commercial real estate markets, as well as the continuing U.S. and global recession in many parts
of the world has caused and we believe will continue to cause historical
35
comparisons to be even more difficult to gauge, and this pattern of revenue has not occurred
over the past two years and may not continue in the future.
Effect of Inflation and/or Deflation
Inflation or deflation, or both, could significantly affect our compensation costs,
particularly those not directly tied to our transaction professionals compensation, due to factors
such as availability of capital and/or increased costs of capital. The rise of inflation could also
significantly and adversely affect certain expenses, such as debt service costs, information
technology and occupancy costs. To the extent that inflation and/or deflation results in rising
interest rates and has other effects upon the commercial real estate markets in which we operate
and, to a lesser extent, the securities markets, it may affect our financial position and results
of operations by reducing the demand for commercial real estate and related services which could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. See Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FAS
167), which requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises
variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. FAS 167 is effective for fiscal periods ending after November 15, 2009. The adoption of
FAS 167 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company. Prior to adoption, the Company
will evaluate the impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (as codified in ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing (ASC
860)). This update to ASC 860 removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and
removes the exception from applying ASC 810 to qualifying special-purpose entities. FAS 166 is
effective for fiscal periods ending after November 15, 2009. The adoption of the amended guidance
is not expected to have a material impact on the Company.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC 820), to provide additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and
level of transaction activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to
normal market activity for the asset or liability. ASC 820 also provides additional guidance on
circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. The amended guidance was
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the
amended guidance had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 825, Financial Instruments (ASC 825), which
extends the disclosure requirements of the fair value of financial instruments to interim financial
statements. The amended guidance was effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009. The adoption of the amended guidance had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
In April 2008, the FASB issued an update to ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (ASC
350), which amended the factors to be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions
used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. This amended guidance was
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 14, 2008, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. The Company adopted the provision of this standard on January 1, 2009, which did not
have a material impact on the Company.
In December 2007, the FASB issued an update to ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC 810), which changes
the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be characterized as noncontrolling
interests and classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method significantly
changes the accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. The Company adopted the
provisions of this standard on January 1, 2009, which resulted in a significant change to total
equity, as the noncontrolling interest had been previously classified outside of equity.
36
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Due to the nature of our business and the manner in which we conduct our operations, in
particular that our financial instruments which are exposed to concentrations of credit risk
consist primarily of short-term cash deposits and investments and in light of the recent support
provided by the U.S. government related to the current credit and liquidity issues, we believe we
do not face any material interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, equity price risk
or other market risk. The recent disruptions in the credit markets, however, have, in some cases,
resulted in an inability to access assets such as money market funds that traditionally have been
viewed as highly liquid. Although we believe that our cash and cash equivalents are deposited,
invested or placed with secure financial institutions, there is no assurance that these financial
institutions will not default on their obligations to us, especially given current credit market
conditions, which would adversely impact our cash and cash equivalent positions and, in turn, our
results of operations and financial condition.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Managements Quarterly Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, respectively) have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as
of September 30, 2009, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide
reasonable assurance that material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in rules and
forms.
The design of any system of control is based upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
objectives under all future events, no matter how remote, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may not deteriorate. Because of its inherent limitations, disclosure
controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Accordingly, even effective
disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the three month period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
37
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are party to various litigation matters, in most cases involving normal ordinary course and
routine claims incidental to our business. We cannot estimate with certainty our ultimate legal and
financial liability with respect to such pending matters. However, we believe, based on our
examination of such pending matters, that our ultimate liability for such matters will not have a
material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing
our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
A. Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HFF, INC.
|
|
Dated: November 6, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ John H. Pelusi, Jr.
|
|
|
|
John H. Pelusi, Jr |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer,
Director and Executive Managing Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 6, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Gregory R. Conley
|
|
|
|
Gregory R. Conley |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
39
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
40