e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended January 30, 2011
|
|
Commission File Number 1-3822 |
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
21-0419870 |
State of Incorporation
|
|
I.R.S. Employer Identification No. |
1 Campbell Place
Camden, New Jersey 08103-1799
Principal Executive Offices
Telephone Number: (856) 342-4800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes
o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes
o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
There were 320,229,427 shares of capital stock outstanding as of March 3, 2011.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(unaudited)
(millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,127 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
|
$ |
4,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
Marketing and selling expenses |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
Administrative expenses |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Other expenses / (income) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
|
|
3,487 |
|
|
Earnings before interest and taxes |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Earnings before taxes |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
Taxes on earnings |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
.72 |
|
|
$ |
.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
$ |
.29 |
|
|
$ |
.275 |
|
|
$ |
.565 |
|
|
$ |
.525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
.71 |
|
|
$ |
.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
Plant assets, net of depreciation |
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
2,015 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of amortization |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,580 |
|
|
$ |
6,276 |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
1,184 |
|
|
$ |
835 |
|
Payable to suppliers and others |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
Dividend payable |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
5,688 |
|
|
|
5,347 |
|
|
Campbell Soup Company shareowners equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; authorized 40 shares; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock, $.0375 par value; authorized 560
shares; issued 542 shares |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Earnings retained in the business |
|
|
9,087 |
|
|
|
8,760 |
|
Capital stock in treasury, at cost |
|
|
(7,939 |
) |
|
|
(7,459 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
Total Campbell Soup Company shareowners equity |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
926 |
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,580 |
|
|
$ |
6,276 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to operating cash flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Changes in working capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
Prepaid assets |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Pension fund contributions |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
Receipts from hedging activities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Other |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of plant assets |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
Sales of plant assets |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net short-term borrowings |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
Treasury stock issuances |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(unaudited)
(millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Shareowners Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
In Treasury |
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
in the |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Business |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
|
Balance at August 2, 2009 |
|
|
542 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,194 |
) |
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
8,288 |
|
|
$ |
(718 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Pension and postretirement benefits,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
Dividends ($.525 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
Treasury stock issued under
management incentive and
stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2010 |
|
|
542 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,321 |
) |
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
8,668 |
|
|
$ |
(655 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
|
Balance at August 1, 2010 |
|
|
542 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,459 |
) |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
8,760 |
|
|
$ |
(736 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Pension and postretirement benefits,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
Dividends ($.565 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(573 |
) |
Treasury stock issued under
management incentive and
stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Balance at January 30, 2011 |
|
|
542 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,939 |
) |
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
9,087 |
|
|
$ |
(595 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(currency in millions, except per share amounts)
1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
The financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows
for the indicated periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The accounting
policies used in preparing these financial statements are consistent with those applied in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 1, 2010. The results for the period are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for other interim periods or the full year.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative guidance
that changed the consolidation model for variable interest entities (VIE). The revised guidance
requires an enterprise to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary, or
consolidator of a VIE, based on whether the entity has the power to direct matters that most
significantly impact the activities of the VIE, and has the obligation to absorb losses or the
right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The revised
guidance also amended the consideration of kick-out rights in determining if an entity is a VIE and
requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary. It also amends the events that
trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. The provisions were effective for the first
quarter of fiscal 2011. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material impact on the
companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance related to fair value
measurements and disclosures. The guidance requires a roll forward, separately presenting
information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis, rather than net, of
the assets and liabilities measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value
measurements). The roll forward information must be provided by the company for the first quarter
of fiscal 2012, as the provision is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2010 and for interim reporting periods within those years.
In November 2010, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance clarifying the required
disclosures of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. The guidance is
effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010.
In December 2010, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance on accounting for
goodwill. The guidance clarifies the impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative
carrying amounts. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those
years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on
the companys consolidated financial statements.
3. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net earnings, net foreign currency
translation adjustments, net unamortized pension and postretirement benefits adjustments, and net
unrealized gains and losses on cash-flow hedges. Total comprehensive income for the three-month
periods ended January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 was $257 and $236, respectively. Total
comprehensive income for the six-month periods ended January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 was $659
and $626, respectively.
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (1) |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax (2) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Unamortized pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
|
(835 |
) |
|
|
(856 |
) |
Prior service (cost)/credit |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(595 |
) |
|
$ |
(736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a tax expense of $1 as of January 30, 2011, and a tax benefit of $1 as of August 1, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes a tax benefit of $9 as of January 30, 2011, and $10 as of August 1, 2010. |
6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes a tax benefit of $477 as of January 30, 2011, and $489 as of August 1, 2010. |
4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table shows the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, |
|
|
Baking |
|
|
Soup, Sauces |
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sauces and |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverages |
|
|
Snacking |
|
|
Beverages |
|
|
Foodservice |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at August 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
585 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
1,919 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
826 |
|
|
$ |
609 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
2,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth balance sheet information for intangible assets, excluding
goodwill, subject to amortization and intangible assets not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Intangible Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-amortizable intangible assets |
|
$ |
507 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net intangible assets |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-amortizable intangible assets consist of trademarks, which mainly include Pace, Royco,
Liebig, Blå Band, and Touch of Taste. Amortizable intangible assets consist substantially of
process technology and customer intangibles.
Amortization related to these assets was less than $1 for the six-month periods ended January
30, 2011, and January 31, 2010. The estimated aggregated amortization expense for each of the five
succeeding fiscal years is less than $1 per year. Asset useful lives range from 10 to 20 years.
5. Business and Geographic Segment Information
Campbell Soup Company, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a global manufacturer
and marketer of high-quality, branded convenience food products. The company has eight operating
segments based on product type and geographic location and reports the results of operations in the
following segments: U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages; Baking and Snacking; International Soup,
Sauces and Beverages; and North America Foodservice.
The U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment represents the U.S. retail business, including the
following products: Campbells condensed and ready-to-serve soups; Swanson broth, stocks and canned
poultry; Prego pasta sauce; Pace Mexican sauce; Campbells canned pasta, gravies, and beans; V8
juices and beverages; and Campbells tomato juice.
The Baking and Snacking segment aggregates the following operating segments: Pepperidge Farm
cookies, crackers, bakery and frozen products in U.S. retail; and Arnotts biscuits in Australia
and Asia Pacific.
The International Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment aggregates the soup, sauce and beverage
operating segments outside of the United States, including Europe, Latin America, the Asia Pacific
region and the retail business in Canada.
The North America Foodservice segment represents the distribution of products such as soup,
specialty entrees, beverage products, other prepared foods and Pepperidge Farm products through
various food service channels in the United States and Canada.
Accounting policies for measuring segment assets and earnings before interest and taxes are
substantially consistent with those described in the companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The company evaluates segment performance before interest and taxes. North America Foodservice
products are principally produced by the tangible assets of the companys other segments, except
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
for refrigerated soups, which are produced in a separate facility, and certain other products,
which are produced under contract
manufacturing agreements. Tangible assets of the companys other segments are not allocated
to the North America Foodservice operations. Depreciation, however, is allocated to North America
Foodservice based on production hours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
$ |
2,125 |
|
|
$ |
2,208 |
|
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
North America Foodservice |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,127 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
|
$ |
4,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Earnings before interest and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
North America Foodservice |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Corporate(1) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
803 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents unallocated corporate expenses. |
Additional product information is provided below for net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simple Meals |
|
$ |
1,335 |
|
|
$ |
1,397 |
|
|
$ |
2,666 |
|
|
$ |
2,796 |
|
Baked Snacks |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
Beverages |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,127 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
|
$ |
4,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
August 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simple Meals |
|
$ |
4,594 |
|
|
$ |
4,674 |
|
|
$ |
4,815 |
|
Baked Snacks |
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
Beverages |
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,676 |
|
|
$ |
7,586 |
|
|
$ |
7,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simple meals include condensed and ready-to-serve soups, broths and sauces. Baked snacks include
cookies, crackers, biscuits and other baked products.
6. Earnings per Share
In June 2008, the FASB issued accounting guidance related to the calculation of earnings per
share. The guidance provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities
and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.
Prior to fiscal 2011, the company granted share-based payment awards with non-forfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that
determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according
to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings.
8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareowners is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
Less: net earnings allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings available to common shareowners |
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: stock options |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.72 |
|
|
$ |
.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.71 |
|
|
$ |
.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no antidilutive stock options for the three-month periods ended January 30, 2011
and January 31, 2010 and the six-month period ended January 30, 2011. Stock options to purchase
approximately 1 million shares of capital stock for the six-month period ended January 31, 2010
were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of
the stock options exceeded the average market price of the capital stock and, therefore, would be
antidilutive.
7. Noncontrolling Interest
The company owns a 70% controlling interest in a Malaysian manufacturing company. The
noncontrolling interest in this entity is included in Total equity in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The earnings attributable to the noncontrolling interest were less than $1 for the three-
and six-month periods ended January 30, 2011, and January 31, 2010, and were included in Other
expenses/(income) in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
The company owns a 60% interest in a joint venture formed to support the development of the
companys business in China. The joint venture began operations on January 31, 2011, the beginning
of the third fiscal quarter. The companys investment in the joint venture as of January 31, 2011
was $10.
8. Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The company sponsors certain defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans
for employees. Components of benefit expense were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
|
Jan. 30, |
|
|
Jan. 31, |
|
|
Jan. 30, |
|
|
Jan. 31, |
|
|
Jan. 30, |
|
|
Jan. 31, |
|
|
Jan. 30, |
|
|
Jan. 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost/(credit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit expense |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A contribution of $100 was made to U.S. pension plans and contributions of $35 were made to
non-U.S. pension plans during the six-month period ended January 30, 2011. Additional
contributions to U.S. pension plans are not expected this fiscal year. Contributions to non-U.S.
pension plans are expected to be approximately $9 during the remainder of the fiscal year.
In fiscal 2010, the company amended its U.S. pension plans. Employees hired or rehired on or
after January 1, 2011 and who are not covered by collective bargaining agreements will not be
eligible to participate in the plans.
9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
In fiscal 2010, the postretirement medical program was also amended to discontinue retiree
medical accounts for employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements and who are not at
least age 50 with at least 10 years of service as of December 31, 2010.
9. Financial Instruments
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
short-term borrowings, excluding the current portion of long-term debt, approximate fair value.
The fair value of long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt in short-term
borrowings, was $2,775 at January 30, 2011 and $2,829 at August 1, 2010. The fair value of
long-term debt was based on quoted market prices or pricing models using current market rates.
The principal market risks to which the company is exposed are changes in foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. In addition, the company is exposed to
equity price changes related to certain deferred compensation obligations. In order to manage
these exposures, the company follows established risk management policies and procedures, including
the use of derivative contracts such as swaps, forwards and commodity futures and option contracts.
These derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying
exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. The company does not
enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments.
The companys derivative programs include strategies that both qualify and do not qualify for hedge
accounting treatment.
The company is exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts will fail to
meet their contractual obligations. The company minimizes the counterparty credit risk on these
transactions by dealing only with leading, credit-worthy financial institutions having long-term
credit ratings of A or better. In addition, the contracts are distributed among several
financial institutions, thus minimizing credit-risk concentration. The company does not have
credit-risk-related contingent features in its derivative instruments as of January 30, 2011.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
The company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk related to its international
operations, including non-functional currency intercompany debt and net investments in
subsidiaries. The company is also exposed to foreign exchange risk as a result of transactions in
currencies other than the functional currency of certain subsidiaries. Principal currencies hedged
include the Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, euro, Swedish krona, New Zealand dollar, British
pound and Japanese yen. The company utilizes foreign exchange forward purchase and sale contracts
as well as cross-currency swaps to hedge these exposures. The contracts are either designated as
cash-flow hedging instruments or are undesignated. The company typically hedges portions of its
forecasted foreign currency transaction exposure with foreign exchange forward contracts for up to
18 months. To hedge currency exposures related to intercompany debt, cross-currency swap contracts
are entered into for periods consistent with the underlying debt. As of January 30, 2011,
cross-currency swap contracts mature in 2011 through 2015. The notional amount of foreign exchange
forward and cross-currency swap contracts accounted for as cash-flow hedges was $265 at January 30,
2011 and $261 at August 1, 2010. The effective portion of the changes in fair value on these
instruments is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and is reclassified into the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings on the same line item and same period in which the underlying
hedge transaction affects earnings. The notional amount of foreign exchange forward and
cross-currency swap contracts that are not designated as accounting hedges was $706 and $757 at
January 30, 2011 and August 1, 2010, respectively.
Interest Rate Risk
The company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates by optimizing the use of
variable-rate and fixed-rate debt and by utilizing interest rate swaps in order to maintain its
variable-to-total debt ratio within targeted guidelines. Receive fixed rate/pay variable rate
interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair-value hedges. The notional amount of outstanding
fair-value interest rate swaps totaled $500 at January 30, 2011 and at August 1, 2010. These swaps
mature in fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2014.
10
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Commodity Price Risk
The company principally uses a combination of purchase orders and various short- and long-term
supply arrangements in connection with the purchase of raw materials, including certain commodities
and agricultural products. The company also enters into commodity futures and options contracts to
reduce the volatility of price fluctuations of diesel fuel, wheat, natural gas, soybean oil,
aluminum, sugar, cocoa, and corn, which impact the cost of raw materials. Commodity futures and
option contracts are typically accounted for as cash-flow hedges or are not designated as
accounting hedges. Commodity futures and option contracts are typically entered into to hedge a
portion of commodity requirements for periods up to 18 months. The notional amount of commodity
contracts accounted for as cash-flow hedges was $9 at January 30, 2011 and $7 at August 1, 2010.
The notional amount of commodity contracts that are not designated as accounting hedges was $45 at
January 30, 2011 and $43 at August 1, 2010.
Equity Price Risk
The company hedges a portion of exposures relating to certain deferred compensation
obligations linked to the total return of the Standard & Poors 500 Index, the total return of the
companys capital stock and the total return of the Puritan Fund or, beginning in January 2011, the
total return of the Vanguard International Stock Index. Under these contracts, the company pays
variable interest rates and receives from the counterparty either the total return of the Standard
& Poors 500 Index, the total return on company capital stock, the total return of the Puritan Fund
or the total return of the iShares MSCI EAFE Index Fund, which is expected to approximate the total
return of the Vanguard International Stock Index. The contracts related to the Puritan Fund
matured in January 2011. The contracts are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes and
are typically entered into for periods not exceeding 12 months. The notional amount of the
contracts outstanding was $73 as of January 30, 2011 and $75 as of August 1, 2010.
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments recorded in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 30, 2011, and August 1, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Other assets |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The derivative assets and liabilities are presented on a gross basis in the table. Certain
derivative asset and liability balances, including cash collateral, are offset in the balance sheet
when a legally enforceable right of offset exists.
The following tables show the effect of the companys derivative instruments designated as
cash-flow hedges for the three- and six-month periods ended January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010,
on other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) and the Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
Derivatives Designated as Cash-Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
OCI Activity |
|
Three Months Ended January 30, 2011, and January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
OCI derivative gain/(loss) at beginning of quarter |
|
|
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
Effective portion of changes in fair value recognized in OCI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of (gain) or loss reclassified from OCI to earnings: |
|
Location in Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Other expenses/income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI derivative gain/(loss) at end of quarter |
|
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Derivatives Designated as Cash-Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
OCI Activity |
|
Six Months Ended January 30, 2011, and January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
OCI derivative gain/(loss) at beginning of year |
|
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
Effective portion of changes in fair value recognized in OCI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Amount of (gain) or loss reclassified from OCI to earnings: |
|
Location in Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Other expenses/income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI derivative gain/(loss) at end of quarter |
|
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount expected to be reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings within
the next 12 months is a loss of $3. The ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness
testing were not material.
The following tables show the effect of the companys derivative instruments designated as
fair-value hedges on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
on Derivatives |
|
|
on Hedged Item |
|
Derivatives Designated |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
as Fair-Value Hedges |
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the effects of the companys derivative instruments not designated
as hedges in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
On Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
Derivatives not Designated as Hedges |
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Other expenses/income |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other expenses/income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Deferred compensation contracts |
|
Administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
10. Fair Value Measurements
The company is required to categorize financial assets and liabilities based on the following
fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the
asset or liability through corroboration with observable market data. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions. |
Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the
measurement date. When available, the company uses unadjusted quoted market prices to measure the
fair value and classifies such items as Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, the
company bases fair value upon internally developed models that use current market-based or
independently sourced market parameters such as interest rates and currency rates.
The following table presents the companys financial assets and liabilities that are measured
at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 30, 2011, and August 1, 2010, consistent with the
fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
January 30, 2011 Using |
|
|
as of |
|
|
August 1, 2010 Using |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps(1) |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swap contracts(3) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives(5) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
January 30, 2011 Using |
|
|
as of |
|
|
August 1, 2010 Using |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts(2) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Cross-currency swap contracts(3) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation derivatives(4) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives(5) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation obligation(6) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on LIBOR swap rates. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on observable market transactions of spot currency rates and forward rates. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on observable local benchmarks for currency and interest rates. |
|
(4) |
|
Based on LIBOR and equity index swap rates. |
|
(5) |
|
Based on quoted futures exchanges. |
|
(6) |
|
Based on the fair value of the participants investments. |
11. Share Repurchase Programs
In June 2008, the companys Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to $1,200 of
company stock through fiscal 2011. This program began in fiscal 2009. In addition to this
publicly announced program, the company repurchases shares to offset the impact of dilution from
shares issued under the companys stock compensation plans.
14
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
During the six-month period ended January 30, 2011, the company repurchased 16 million shares
at a cost of $573. Of this amount, $456 was used to repurchase shares pursuant to the companys
June 2008 publicly announced share repurchase program. Approximately $94 remains available under
this program as of January 30, 2011.
During the six-month period ended January 31, 2010, the company repurchased 7 million shares
at a cost of $213. Of this amount, $118 was used to repurchase shares pursuant to the companys
June 2008 publicly announced share repurchase program.
12. Stock-based Compensation
The company provides compensation benefits by issuing unrestricted stock, restricted stock and
restricted stock units (including EPS performance restricted stock/units and total shareowner
return (TSR) performance restricted stock/units). In previous fiscal years, the company also
issued stock options and stock appreciation rights to provide compensation benefits.
Total pre-tax stock-based compensation recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings
was $25 for the three-month periods ended January 30, 2011, and January 31, 2010. Tax-related
benefits of $9 and $10 were also recognized for the three-month periods ended January 30, 2011, and
January 31, 2010, respectively. Total pre-tax stock-based compensation recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings was $46 and $45 for the six-month periods ended January 30,
2011, and January 31, 2010, respectively. Tax-related benefits of $17 were also recognized for the
six-month periods ended January 30, 2011, and January 31, 2010. Cash received from the exercise of
stock options was $38 and $36 for the six-month periods ended January 30, 2011, and January 31,
2010, respectively, and is reflected in cash flows from financing activities in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.
The following table summarizes stock option activity as of January 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Options in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at August 1, 2010 |
|
|
12,473 |
|
|
$ |
26.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,586 |
) |
|
$ |
26.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
34.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 30, 2011 |
|
|
10,858 |
|
|
$ |
26.39 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 30, 2011 |
|
|
10,858 |
|
|
$ |
26.39 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six-month periods ended January 30,
2011, and January 31, 2010, was $14 and $9, respectively. As of January 2009, compensation related
to stock options was fully expensed. The company measured the fair value of stock options using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The following table summarizes time-lapse restricted stock/units and EPS performance
restricted stock/units as of January 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Shares/Units |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(Restricted stock/units in thousands) |
|
Nonvested at August 1, 2010 |
|
|
2,395 |
|
|
$ |
35.05 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
$ |
36.08 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(1,078 |
) |
|
$ |
35.86 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
34.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at January 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,398 |
|
|
$ |
35.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of time-lapse restricted stock/units and EPS performance restricted stock/units
is determined based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of the companys stock at
the date of grant. Time-lapse restricted stock/units granted in fiscal
15
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2006 and forward are expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, except for awards issued to retirement-eligible participants, which
are expensed on an accelerated basis. EPS performance restricted stock/units are expensed on a
graded-vesting basis, except for awards issued to retirement-eligible participants, which are
expensed on an accelerated basis.
As of January 30, 2011, total remaining unearned compensation related to nonvested time-lapse
restricted stock/units and EPS performance restricted stock/units was $50, which will be amortized
over the weighted-average remaining service period of 1.8 years. The fair value of restricted
stock/units vested during the six-month periods ended January 30, 2011, and January 31, 2010, was
$39 and $30, respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the restricted
stock/units granted during the six-month period ended January 31, 2010, was $32.19.
The following table summarizes TSR performance restricted stock/units as of January 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Shares/Units |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(Restricted stock/units in thousands) |
|
Nonvested at August 1, 2010 |
|
|
3,581 |
|
|
$ |
38.02 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
$ |
43.18 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
$ |
34.65 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
38.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at January 30, 2011 |
|
|
3,693 |
|
|
$ |
40.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of TSR performance restricted stock/units is estimated at the grant date using
a Monte Carlo simulation. Assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.06 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
23.71 |
% |
|
|
24.83 |
% |
Expected term |
|
3 yrs. |
|
3 yrs. |
Expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period. As of January 30,
2011, total remaining unearned compensation related to TSR performance restricted stock/units was
$79, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining service period of 2.1 years. In
the first quarter of fiscal 2011, recipients of TSR performance restricted stock/units earned 100%
of their initial grants based upon the companys TSR ranking in a performance peer group during a
three-year period ended July 30, 2010. The total fair value of TSR performance restricted
stock/units vested during the six-month periods ended January 30, 2011, and January 31, 2010, was
$38 and $31, respectively. The grant-date fair value of TSR performance restricted stock/units
granted during the six-month period ended January 31, 2010, was $33.84.
Prior to fiscal 2009, employees could elect to defer all types of restricted stock awards.
These awards were classified as liabilities because of the possibility that they may be settled in
cash. The fair value was adjusted quarterly. As of October 2010, these awards were fully vested.
Total cash paid to settle the liabilities during the six-month periods ended January 30, 2011, and
January 31, 2010, was not material.
The excess tax benefits on the exercise of stock options and vested restricted stock presented
as cash flows from financing activities for the six-month periods ended January 30, 2011, and
January 31, 2010, were $6 and $4, respectively.
13. Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Raw materials, containers and supplies |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
Finished products |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
14. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Other cash used in operating activities for the six-month periods is comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Benefit related payments |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Item 2.
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSES OF
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
OVERVIEW
Description of the Company
Campbell Soup Company is a global manufacturer and marketer of high-quality, branded
convenience food products. The company reports in the following segments: U.S. Soup, Sauces and
Beverages; Baking and Snacking; International Soup, Sauces and Beverages; and North America
Foodservice.
Executive Summary
This Executive Summary provides significant highlights from the discussion and analysis that
follows.
|
|
|
Net sales decreased 1% in the quarter to $2.127 billion. |
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages sales declined 4% due primarily to lower
sales in U.S. Soup, which also declined 4%. U.S. Soup sales were negatively impacted
by increased promotional spending. |
|
|
|
|
Baking and Snacking sales increased 8%. |
|
|
|
Gross profit, as a percent of sales, decreased from 40.5% a year ago to 39.4% in the
current quarter, reflecting increased promotional spending. |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share decreased 4% in the quarter to $.71. |
Net Earnings
Net earnings were $239 million in the quarter ended January 30, 2011 compared to $259 million
in the year-ago quarter. The decrease was primarily due to the decline in gross margin
performance, resulting from increased promotional spending primarily in U.S. Soup, partly offset by
productivity improvements. Earnings per share were $.71 compared to $.74 a year ago. Earnings per
share benefited from a reduction in the weighted average diluted shares outstanding, which was
primarily due to share repurchases under the companys strategic share repurchase program.
Net earnings were $518 million for the six months ended January 30, 2011, compared to $563
million for the year-ago period. The decline was primarily due to increased promotional spending
and cost inflation, partly offset by productivity improvements and favorable mix. Earnings per
share were $1.53 compared to $1.61 a year ago. Earnings per share benefitted from a reduction in
the weighted average diluted shares outstanding, which was primarily due to share repurchases under
the companys strategic share repurchase program.
SECOND-QUARTER DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Sales
An analysis of net sales by reportable segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
North America Foodservice |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,127 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
An analysis of percent change of net sales by reportable segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, |
|
Baking |
|
Soup, Sauces |
|
North |
|
|
|
|
Sauces and |
|
and |
|
and |
|
America |
|
|
|
|
Beverages |
|
Snacking |
|
Beverages |
|
Foodservice |
|
Total |
Volume and Mix |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
Price and Sales Allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increased Promotional Spending (1) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents revenue reductions from trade promotion and consumer coupon redemption programs. |
In the U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment, sales declined 4%. In the quarter, the
overall competitive environment remained challenging throughout the U.S. food industry. The company
maintained a higher level of promotional spending through the second quarter to meet competitive
pressure and honor commitments made to customers prior to the commencement of the period. U.S. Soup
sales decreased 4% due primarily to increased promotional spending, which did not deliver
anticipated volume gains. U.S. Soup sales were also negatively impacted by movements in customer
inventories, primarily cooking soups. In U.S. Soup, retail consumer takeaway volume, based on IRI
panel data and company estimates, grew during the quarter, although the companys volume was
comparable to a year ago. Further details of the companys U.S.
Soup sales performance include:
|
|
|
Sales of Campbells condensed soups decreased 7% reflecting declines in both cooking
and eating varieties. Sales of eating varieties continued to be negatively impacted by
promotional discounting in ready-to-serve soups. |
|
|
|
|
Sales of ready-to-serve soups decreased 4%, primarily due to declines in the higher
priced ready-to-serve microwavable soups. Sales of ready-to-serve canned soups were
comparable to a year ago as volume gains, principally double-digit gains in Campbells
Chunky soups, were offset by increased promotional spending. In response to an
increased level of promotional spending across other simple meal alternatives,
promotional spending was increased, primarily on Campbells Chunky soups, to be more
competitive. |
|
|
|
|
Broth sales increased 7% due to volume gains from a strong holiday performance. |
Within the U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment, beverage sales decreased 1% as higher
promotional spending was only partially offset by volume gains. Promotional spending was increased
across the portfolio to be more competitive with other beverages. Sales of V8 vegetable juice
declined due to increased competitive activity, while sales of V8 V-Fusion juice and V8 Splash
juice drinks increased. Sales of V8 V-Fusion juice benefitted from new item launches and
advertising. Sales of Prego pasta sauce and Pace Mexican sauce declined due to increased
competitive activity. Pace Mexican sauce was negatively impacted by private label distribution
gains, primarily in mass merchandisers.
In the Baking and Snacking segment, sales increased 8%. Sales at Pepperidge Farm increased,
reflecting volume gains and improved price realization. Pepperidge Farm sales increased due to
gains in Goldfish snack crackers and Baked Naturals crackers, Milano and Homestyle cookies,
stuffing, Swirl bread, and the expansion of the Deli Flats line. In Arnotts, sales increased
primarily due to currency, gains in Shapes and Vita-Weat savory crackers and Tim Tam chocolate
biscuits, partly offset by a decline in other sweet biscuit products.
In the International Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment, sales decreased 4%. In Europe, sales
declined primarily due to currency, as well as lower sales in France and Germany, partly offset by
higher sales in Belgium. Sales in Latin America declined. In Asia Pacific, sales increased
primarily due to currency and gains in Australian soup. In Canada, sales increased due to
currency, partially offset by lower soup and beverage sales due to increased promotional spending
to be more competitive with other simple meal and beverage products.
In the North America Foodservice segment, sales declined 1%, or $1 million, due to volume
declines.
19
Gross Profit
Gross profit, defined as Net sales less Cost of products sold, decreased by $33 million in
2011. As a percent of sales, gross profit decreased from 40.5% in 2010 to 39.4% in 2011. The 1.1
percentage point decrease was due to the impact of cost inflation and other factors, including
higher plant costs and depreciation (approximately 1.8 percentage points); increased promotional
spending (approximately 1.2 percentage points); and mix (approximately 0.1 percentage point),
partially offset by productivity improvements (approximately 1.9 percentage points); and higher
selling prices (approximately 0.1 percentage point).
Marketing and Selling Expenses
Marketing and selling expenses as a percent of sales were 13.7% in 2011 and 14.0% in 2010.
Marketing and selling expenses decreased 3% in 2011 from 2010. The decrease was primarily due to
lower advertising expenses (approximately 1 percentage point); lower selling expenses
(approximately 1 percentage point); and cost savings in marketing overhead (approximately 1
percentage point). Advertising expenses were lower in U.S. soup and sauces, partially offset by
increases in U.S. beverages and Pepperidge Farm.
Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 7.2% in 2011 and 6.9% in 2010.
Administrative expenses increased by 3% in 2011 from 2010, primarily due to pension and employee
benefit costs (approximately 4 percentage points of the total
change); information systems related costs
(approximately 2 percentage points); costs associated with the corporate headquarters facility
(approximately 1 percentage point); and the impact of currency (approximately 1 percentage point),
partially offset by lower compensation costs (approximately 5 percentage points).
Operating Earnings
Segment operating earnings decreased 8% in 2011 from 2010.
An analysis of operating earnings by segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
North America Foodservice |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Corporate |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from the U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment decreased 15% in 2011
versus 2010 primarily due to the 4% decline in net sales and a reduction in gross margin
percentage. The decline in gross margin percentage reflects the higher level of promotional
spending, which did not deliver the anticipated volume gains, and modest cost inflation, partly
offset by productivity improvements.
Earnings from the Baking and Snacking segment increased 11% in 2011 versus 2010 primarily due
to gains in Pepperidge Farm. Earnings gains in Pepperidge Farm were primarily due to improved
volume performance and gains on commodity hedging contracts. Earnings in Arnotts were comparable
to a year ago as the impact of currency offset a decline in the business.
In the International Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment, earnings declined 7% in 2011 versus
2010. The decline reflects lower earnings in Europe and Canada. In Europe, earnings were
negatively impacted by lower net pricing, currency and cost inflation, partly offset by
productivity improvements. Earnings declined in Canada reflecting lower net sales, which were
negatively impacted by increased promotional spending to improve our competitiveness with other
simple meals and beverages, partly offset by favorable foreign currency transaction rates.
Earnings from the North America Foodservice segment increased $4 million, or 24%, in 2011
versus 2010. The increase in earnings reflected the impact of favorable foreign currency
transaction rates and the benefit of cost reduction efforts.
20
Interest Expense/Income
Interest expense increased to $34 million from $27 million in the prior year, primarily due to
an increase in fixed-rate debt.
Taxes on Earnings
The effective tax rate was 27.1% for the current quarter and 29.0% for the year-ago quarter.
The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to lower taxes on foreign earnings.
SIX-MONTH DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Sales
An analysis of net sales by reportable segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
2,125 |
|
|
$ |
2,208 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
North America Foodservice |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
|
$ |
4,356 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An analysis of percent change of net sales by reportable segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, |
|
Baking |
|
Soup, Sauces |
|
North |
|
|
|
|
Sauces and |
|
and |
|
and |
|
America |
|
|
|
|
Beverages |
|
Snacking |
|
Beverages |
|
Foodservice |
|
Total |
Volume and Mix |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
Price and Sales Allowances |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increased Promotional Spending (1) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents revenue reductions from trade promotion and consumer coupon redemption programs. |
In the U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment, sales declined 4%. U.S. Soup sales decreased
5% due primarily to increased promotional spending, which did not deliver anticipated volume gains.
During this year, the overall competitive environment remained challenging throughout the U.S.
food industry. In response, the company maintained higher levels of promotional support.
|
|
|
Sales of Campbells condensed soups decreased 4% primarily due to declines in eating
varieties. Sales of eating varieties were negatively impacted by promotional
discounting in ready-to-serve soups. Sales of condensed cooking varieties also
declined. |
|
|
|
|
Sales of ready-to-serve soups decreased 9%, primarily due to increased promotional
spending, which did not deliver anticipated volume gains. The company increased
promotional spending, primarily on Campbells Chunky soups, to be more competitive with
other simple meal alternatives. |
|
|
|
|
Broth sales increased 2% due to a strong holiday performance. |
Within the U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment, beverage sales increased 5% on solid volume
gains, benefitting from increased promotional spending and advertising. Strong sales gains in V8
V-Fusion juice, which benefitted from new product launches, and V8 Splash juice drinks were
slightly offset by lower sales in V8 vegetable juice. Sales of Prego pasta sauce declined due to
increased promotional spending. Earlier in the period, the company increased promotional spending
by offering greater discounts for trade merchandising events to be more competitive in the
category. Sales of Pace Mexican sauce declined primarily due to private label distribution gains,
primarily in mass merchandisers.
In the Baking and Snacking segment, sales increased 5%. Pepperidge Farm sales increased
reflecting strong growth in Goldfish snack crackers and Baked Naturals crackers and bakery
products, including stuffing, bread, and the expansion of the Deli Flats line.
21
In Arnotts, sales increased primarily due to currency, gains in Shapes, Vita-Weat, and
Cruskits savory crackers, partly offset by declines in Tim Tam chocolate biscuits and other sweet
biscuit products.
In the International Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment, sales decreased 2%. In Europe, sales
declined primarily due to currency. Sales in Latin America declined. In Asia Pacific, sales
increased primarily due to currency and volume-driven gains in Australia. In Canada, sales
increased due to currency and volume gains, partially offset by increased promotional spending on
soup and beverage products to be more competitive with other simple meal and beverage products.
In the North America Foodservice segment, sales decreased 2% primarily due to volume declines.
Gross Profit
Gross profit, defined as Net sales less Cost of products sold, decreased by $62 million in
2011. As a percent of sales, gross profit decreased from 41.2% in 2010 to 40.3% in 2011. The 0.9
percentage point decrease was due to the impact of cost inflation and other factors, including
higher plant costs and depreciation (approximately 1.7 percentage points); and increased
promotional spending (approximately 1.4 percentage points), partially offset by productivity
improvements (approximately 1.7 percentage points); favorable mix (approximately 0.4 percentage
point); and higher selling prices (approximately 0.1 percentage point).
Marketing and Selling Expenses
Marketing and selling expenses as a percent of sales were 13.2% in 2011 and 13.4% in 2010.
Marketing and selling expenses decreased 3% in 2011 from 2010. The decrease was primarily due to
lower selling expenses (approximately 2 percentage points) and cost savings in marketing overhead
(approximately 1 percentage point). The lower selling expenses primarily resulted from a
reorganization of the companys U.S. sales teams and expanded use of sales brokers in the fourth
quarter of 2010.
Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 6.8% in 2011 and 6.5% in 2010.
Administrative expenses increased by 4% in 2011 from 2010, primarily due to an increase in pension
and health care benefit costs (approximately 2 percentage points of the total change); costs associated
with the corporate headquarters facility (approximately 1 percentage point); information systems
related costs (approximately 1 percentage point); higher general administrative costs
(approximately 1 percentage point); and the impact of currency (approximately 1 percentage point),
partially offset by lower compensation costs (approximately 2 percentage points).
Operating Earnings
Segment operating earnings decreased 7% in 2011 from 2010.
An analysis of operating earnings by segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
North America Foodservice |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Corporate |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
803 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from the U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment decreased 13% in 2011 primarily due
to lower net sales and a lower gross margin percentage. The increased promotional spending in U.S.
Soup negatively impacted margins. In the second half of the year, the company plans to reduce the
level of promotional spending while increasing its reliance on advertising and brand-building
initiatives.
Earnings from the Baking and Snacking segment increased 5% due to higher earnings
at Pepperidge Farm. Gains in Pepperidge Farm earnings were primarily due to volume gains,
productivity improvements and higher selling prices, which more than offset the
22
impact of cost inflation. Earnings in Arnotts were comparable to 2010 as the impact of
currency offset lower earnings in the business. Earnings in Arnotts were negatively impacted by
cost inflation and higher administrative costs, partly offset by productivity improvements.
Earnings from the International Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment increased 2% in 2011 versus
2010 as volume gains, primarily in Canada, and productivity savings were partly offset by higher
promotional spending and inflation.
Earnings from the North America Foodservice segment increased 2%, or $1 million, reflecting
the impact of favorable foreign currency transaction rates and the benefit of cost reduction
efforts.
Interest Expense/Income
Interest expense increased to $66 million from $55 million in the prior year, primarily due to
an increase in fixed-rate debt.
Taxes on Earnings
The effective tax rate was 30.2% for the current period and 31.0% for the year-ago period.
The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to lower taxes on foreign earnings.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The company expects that foreseeable liquidity and capital resource requirements, including
cash outflows to repurchase shares, pay dividends and fund pension plan contributions, will be met
through anticipated cash flows from operations; long-term borrowings under its shelf registration
statement; short-term borrowings, including commercial paper; and cash and cash equivalents. The
company expects that its sources of financing are adequate to meet its future liquidity and capital
resource requirements. The cost and terms of any future financing arrangements may be negatively
impacted by capital and credit market disruptions and will depend on the market conditions and the
companys financial position at the time.
The company generated cash from operations of $483 million in 2011, compared to $496 million
last year. The benefit of lower pension contributions in 2011 was mostly offset by higher working
capital requirements and lower earnings.
Capital expenditures were $74 million in 2011 compared to $103 million a year ago. Capital
expenditures in 2011 included a number of smaller projects, the largest of which were the expansion
of beverage production capacity (approximately $4 million), the ongoing implementation of SAP in
Australia and New Zealand (approximately $3 million), expenditures at the companys corporate
headquarters (approximately $3 million) and expansion of Pepperidge Farms production capacity
(approximately $2 million). Capital expenditures are expected to total approximately $275 million
in 2011.
Excluding shares owned and tendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding requirements on
the vesting of restricted shares and for stock option exercises, the company repurchased 16 million
shares at a cost of $573 million during the six-month period ended January 30, 2011 and 7 million
shares at a cost of $213 million during the six-month period ended January 31, 2010. Approximately
13.0 million of the shares repurchased in the current year and approximately 3.6 million of the
shares repurchased in the prior-year period were repurchased pursuant to the companys June 2008
publicly announced share repurchase program. Approximately $94 million remains available under the
June 2008 repurchase program as of January 30, 2011. In addition to the June 2008 publicly
announced share repurchase program, the company also purchased shares to offset the impact of
dilution from shares issued under the companys stock compensation plans. The company expects to
continue this practice in the future. See Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds for more information.
At January 30, 2011, the company had $1,184 million of short-term borrowings due within one
year and $24 million of standby letters of credit issued on behalf of the company. The company has
a $975 million committed 364-day revolving credit facility that matures in September 2011. The
company also has a $975 million committed revolving credit facility that matures in September 2013.
The facilities remained unused at January 30, 2011, except for $24 million of standby letters of
credit issued on behalf of the company. The agreements support the companys commercial paper
programs. In February 2011, the company repaid $700 million of maturing fixed-rate notes with the
proceeds from commercial paper borrowings.
23
In November 2008, the company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that registered an indeterminate amount of debt securities. Under the registration
statement, the company may issue debt securities, depending on market conditions.
The company is in compliance with the covenants contained in its revolving credit facilities
and debt securities.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The consolidated financial statements of the company are prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial
statements requires the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results could differ from those
estimates and assumptions. The significant accounting policies of the company are described in
Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The significant accounting estimates are
described in Managements Discussion and Analysis included in the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K,
as supplemented by the expanded discussion of trade and consumer promotion programs described
below.
Trade and consumer promotion programs To drive volume, the company offers various sales
incentive programs to customers and consumers, such as cooperative advertising programs, feature
price discounts, in-store display incentives and coupons. The cost of these programs is classified
as a reduction of revenue. The mix between promotion programs, which are classified as reductions
in revenue, and advertising or other marketing activities, which are classified as marketing and
selling expenses, fluctuates between periods based on the companys overall marketing plans, and
such fluctuations have an impact on revenues. The recognition of the costs for trade and consumer
promotion programs involves the use of judgment related to performance and redemption estimates.
Estimates are made based on historical experience and other factors. Actual expenses may differ if
the level of redemption rates and performance vary from estimates. Typically, programs that are
offered have a very short duration. Historically, the difference between actual experience
compared to estimated redemptions and performance has not been significant to the quarterly or
annual financial statements.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative guidance
that changed the consolidation model for variable interest entities (VIE). The revised guidance
requires an enterprise to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary, or
consolidator of a VIE, based on whether the entity has the power to direct matters that most
significantly impact the activities of the VIE, and has the obligation to absorb losses or the
right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The revised
guidance also amended the consideration of kick-out rights in determining if an entity is a VIE and
requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary. It also amends the events that
trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. The provisions are effective for the first
quarter of fiscal 2011. The adoption did not have a material impact on the companys consolidated
financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance related to fair value
measurements and disclosures. The guidance requires a roll forward, separately presenting
information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis, rather than net, of
the assets and liabilities measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value
measurements). The roll forward information must be provided by the company for the first quarter
of fiscal 2012, as the provision is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2010 and for interim reporting periods within those years.
In November 2010, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance clarifying the required
disclosures of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. The guidance is
effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010.
In December 2010, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance on accounting for
goodwill. The guidance clarifies the impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative
carrying amounts. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those
years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on
the companys consolidated financial statements.
24
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements that reflect the companys current
expectations regarding future results of operations, economic performance, financial condition and
achievements of the company. The company tries, wherever possible, to identify these
forward-looking statements by using words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect,
will and similar expressions. One can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts. These statements reflect the companys current plans and
expectations and are based on information currently available to it. They rely on a number of
assumptions regarding future events and estimates which could be inaccurate and which are
inherently subject to risks and uncertainties.
The company wishes to caution the reader that the following important factors and those
important factors described in other Securities and Exchange Commission filings of the company, or
in the companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, could affect the companys actual results and
could cause such results to vary materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements
made by, or on behalf of, the company:
|
|
|
the impact of strong competitive response to the companys efforts to leverage its brand
power with product innovation, promotional programs and new advertising, and of changes in
consumer demand for the companys products; |
|
|
|
|
the risks in the marketplace associated with trade and consumer acceptance of product
improvements, shelving initiatives, new product introductions, and pricing and promotional
strategies; |
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to achieve sales and earnings guidance, which is based on
assumptions about sales volume, product mix, the development and success of new products,
the impact of marketing, promotional and pricing actions, product costs and currency; |
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to realize projected cost savings and benefits; |
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to successfully manage changes to its business processes, including
selling, distribution, manufacturing, information management systems and the integration of
acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
the increased significance of certain of the companys key trade customers; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of inventory management practices by the companys trade customers; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of fluctuations in the supply and inflation in energy, raw and packaging
materials cost; |
|
|
|
|
the impact associated with portfolio changes and completion of acquisitions and
divestitures; |
|
|
|
|
the uncertainties of litigation described from time to time in the companys Securities
and Exchange Commission filings; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of changes in currency exchange rates, tax rates, interest rates, debt and
equity markets, inflation rates, economic conditions and other external factors; and |
|
|
|
|
the impact of unforeseen business disruptions in one or more of the companys markets due
to political instability, civil disobedience, armed hostilities, natural disasters or other
calamities. |
This discussion of uncertainties is by no means exhaustive but is designed to highlight
important factors that may impact the companys outlook. The company disclaims any obligation or
intent to update forward-looking statements made by the company in order to reflect new
information, events or circumstances after the date they are made.
25
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For information regarding the companys exposure to certain market risk, see Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
There have been no significant changes in the companys portfolio of financial instruments or
market risk exposures from the fiscal 2010 year-end.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the
President and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Administrative Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls
and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of January 30, 2011 (Evaluation Date). Based on such
evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date,
the companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
b. Changes in Internal Controls
During the quarter ended January 30, 2011, there were no changes in the companys internal
control over financial reporting that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially
affect, such internal control over financial reporting.
26
PART II
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Shares that may yet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
be Purchased |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Programs |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
Per Share(2) |
|
|
Programs(3) |
|
|
($ in Millions)(3) |
|
11/1/10 11/30/10 |
|
|
1,303,433 |
(4) |
|
$ |
35.30 |
(4) |
|
|
897,770 |
|
|
$ |
421 |
|
12/1/10 12/31/10 |
|
|
5,850,889 |
(5) |
|
$ |
34.39 |
(5) |
|
|
5,203,567 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
1/1/11 1/30/11 |
|
|
4,908,924 |
(6) |
|
$ |
34.79 |
(6) |
|
|
4,262,315 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12,063,246 |
|
|
$ |
34.65 |
|
|
|
10,363,652 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes (i) 1,654,948 shares repurchased in open-market transactions to offset the dilutive impact to existing
shareowners of issuances under the companys stock compensation plans, (ii) 33,708 shares owned and tendered in
connection with stock option exercises, and (iii) 10,938 shares owned and tendered by employees to satisfy tax
withholding obligations on the vesting of restricted shares. Unless otherwise indicated, shares owned and tendered
by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations were purchased at the closing price of the companys shares on
the date of vesting. |
|
(2) |
|
Average price paid per share is calculated on a settlement basis and excludes commission. |
|
(3) |
|
During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the company had one publicly announced share repurchase program. Under
this program, which was announced on June 30, 2008, the companys Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up
to $1.2 billion of company stock through the end of fiscal 2011. In addition to the publicly announced share
repurchase program, the company expects to continue to purchase shares, under separate authorization, as part of
its practice of buying back shares sufficient to offset shares issued under incentive compensation plans. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes (i) 396,730 shares repurchased in open-market transactions at an average price of $35.56 to offset the
dilutive impact to existing shareowners of issuances under the companys stock compensation plans, and (ii) 8,933
shares owned and tendered by employees at an average price per share of $36.20 to satisfy tax withholding
requirements on the vesting of restricted shares. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes (i) 621,320 shares repurchased in open-market transactions at an average price of $34.40 to offset the
dilutive impact to existing shareowners of issuances under the companys stock compensation plans, (ii) 23,997
shares owned and tendered at an average price per share of $35.33 in connection with stock option exercises, and
(iii) 2,005 shares owned and tendered by employees at an average price per share of $34.25 to satisfy tax
withholding requirements on the vesting of restricted shares. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes (i) 636,898 shares repurchased in open-market transactions at an average price of $34.79 to offset the
dilutive impact to existing shareowners of issuances under the companys stock compensation plans, and (ii) 9,711
shares owned and tendered at an average price per share of $34.55 in connection with stock option exercises. |
27
Item 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
10(a)
|
|
First Amendment to the Campbell Soup Company Mid-Career Hire Pension Plan, effective as of December 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
10(b)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Supplemental Retirement Plan (formerly known as Deferred Compensation Plan II), as
amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2011. |
|
|
|
10(c)
|
|
First Amendment to the Campbell Soup Company Supplemental Employees Retirement Plan, effective as of
December 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Certification of B. Craig Owens pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
32(a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
32(b)
|
|
Certification of B. Craig Owens pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document |
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 9, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ B. Craig Owens
|
|
|
|
B. Craig Owens |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief
Financial Officer and Chief
Administrative Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Ellen Oran Kaden
|
|
|
|
Ellen Oran Kaden |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Law
and
Government Affairs |
|
29
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
10(a)
|
|
First Amendment to the Campbell Soup Company Mid-Career Hire Pension Plan, effective as of December 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
10(b)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Supplemental Retirement Plan (formerly known as Deferred Compensation Plan II), as
amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2011. |
|
|
|
10(c)
|
|
First Amendment to the Campbell Soup Company Supplemental Employees Retirement Plan, effective as of
December 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Certification of B. Craig Owens pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
32(a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
32(b)
|
|
Certification of B. Craig Owens pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document |