e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-34385
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
26-2749336
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1800
Atlanta, Georgia
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
30309
(Zip Code) |
(404) 892-0896
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of
August 9, 2011, there were 94,782,520 outstanding shares of common stock of Invesco Mortgage
Capital Inc.
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
$ in thousands, except per share amounts |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value |
|
|
12,155,861 |
|
|
|
5,578,333 |
|
Cash |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
63,552 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
134,037 |
|
|
|
101,144 |
|
Investment related receivable |
|
|
121,120 |
|
|
|
7,601 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated limited partnerships, at fair value |
|
|
48,177 |
|
|
|
54,725 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
46,295 |
|
|
|
22,503 |
|
Derivative assets, at fair value |
|
|
19,131 |
|
|
|
33,255 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,063 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
12,526,750 |
|
|
|
5,862,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
9,560,766 |
|
|
|
4,344,659 |
|
Derivative liability, at fair value |
|
|
139,129 |
|
|
|
37,850 |
|
Dividends and distributions payable |
|
|
72,575 |
|
|
|
49,741 |
|
Investment related payable |
|
|
910,552 |
|
|
|
372,285 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
9,853 |
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
Due to affiliate |
|
|
6,863 |
|
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
10,701,383 |
|
|
|
4,811,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock: par value $0.01 per share; 50,000,000 shares
authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock: par value $0.01 per share; 450,000,000 shares
authorized, 92,945,506 and 49,854,196 shares issued and
outstanding, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively |
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
1,889,173 |
|
|
|
1,002,809 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(89,838 |
) |
|
|
24,015 |
|
Distributions in excess of earnings |
|
|
(4,423 |
) |
|
|
(8,173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,795,841 |
|
|
|
1,019,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
29,526 |
|
|
|
31,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,825,367 |
|
|
|
1,050,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
12,526,750 |
|
|
|
5,862,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
$ in thousands, except per share data |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
108,981 |
|
|
|
29,207 |
|
|
|
177,517 |
|
|
|
47,217 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
34,207 |
|
|
|
6,379 |
|
|
|
49,785 |
|
|
|
10,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
74,774 |
|
|
|
22,828 |
|
|
|
127,732 |
|
|
|
37,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
3,605 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
Equity in earnings and fair value change in unconsolidated
limited
partnerships |
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
2,095 |
|
Loss on other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(386 |
) |
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
Realized and unrealized credit default swap income |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
6,540 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
12,125 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fee related party |
|
|
5,753 |
|
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
9,728 |
|
|
|
3,055 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
6,910 |
|
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
11,754 |
|
|
|
5,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
74,404 |
|
|
|
22,059 |
|
|
|
128,103 |
|
|
|
35,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
72,998 |
|
|
|
20,750 |
|
|
|
125,246 |
|
|
|
32,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
(basic/diluted) |
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
73,486 |
|
|
|
22,808 |
|
|
|
62,731 |
|
|
|
19,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
74,929 |
|
|
|
24,239 |
|
|
|
64,167 |
|
|
|
20,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Distributions in |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands, except per |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Controlling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
share amounts |
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income (loss) |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Income |
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
49,854,196 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
1,002,809 |
|
|
|
24,015 |
|
|
|
(8,173 |
) |
|
|
1,019,150 |
|
|
|
31,664 |
|
|
|
1,050,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,246 |
|
|
|
125,246 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
128,103 |
|
|
|
128,103 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains
and losses on available for
sale
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
Change in net unrealized gains
and losses on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114,420 |
) |
|
|
(2,465 |
) |
|
|
(116,885 |
) |
|
|
(116,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of
common stock, net of offering
costs |
|
|
43,087,519 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
886,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
886,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
886,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards |
|
|
3,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121,496 |
) |
|
|
(121,496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121,496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common unit dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,807 |
) |
|
|
(2,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of equity-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
92,945,506 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
1,889,173 |
|
|
|
(89,838 |
) |
|
|
(4,423 |
) |
|
|
1,795,841 |
|
|
|
29,526 |
|
|
|
1,825,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement.
3
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
128,103 |
|
|
|
35,226 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of mortgage-backed securities premiums and discounts, net |
|
|
11,149 |
|
|
|
(5,423 |
) |
Unrealized loss on interest swap |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Unrealized gain on credit default swap |
|
|
(1,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(4,805 |
) |
|
|
(1,375 |
) |
Loss on other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
386 |
|
Equity in earnings and fair value change in unconsolidated limited
partnerships |
|
|
(3,731 |
) |
|
|
(2,095 |
) |
Amortization of equity-based compensation |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued interest |
|
|
(23,792 |
) |
|
|
(6,959 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(776 |
) |
|
|
320 |
|
Increase in accrued interest payable |
|
|
7,274 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
Increase in due to affiliate |
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
115,843 |
|
|
|
23,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(7,020,050 |
) |
|
|
(1,826,855 |
) |
(Contributions) distributions (to) from Investment in PPIP, net |
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
|
(36,134 |
) |
Principal payments from mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
491,577 |
|
|
|
160,835 |
|
Proceeds from sale of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
344,767 |
|
|
|
169,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(6,171,996 |
) |
|
|
(1,533,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
886,929 |
|
|
|
342,136 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
(26,944 |
) |
|
|
(16,445 |
) |
Proceeds from repurchase agreements |
|
|
33,213,268 |
|
|
|
6,720,307 |
|
Principal repayments of repurchase agreements |
|
|
(27,997,161 |
) |
|
|
(5,589,934 |
) |
Investment related payable |
|
|
18,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from TALF financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,525 |
|
Principal payments of TALF financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
Payments of dividends and distributions |
|
|
(101,469 |
) |
|
|
(25,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
5,992,667 |
|
|
|
1,502,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash |
|
|
(63,486 |
) |
|
|
(7,806 |
) |
Cash, beginning of period |
|
|
63,552 |
|
|
|
24,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
16,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplement disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
|
42,511 |
|
|
|
9,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities and derivatives |
|
|
(116,043 |
) |
|
|
(6,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in investment in PPIP |
|
|
(1,431 |
) |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in restricted cash |
|
|
(5,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and distributions declared not paid |
|
|
72,575 |
|
|
|
20,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable for mortgage-backed securities purchased |
|
|
(399,323 |
) |
|
|
(363,753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note 1 Organization and Business Operations
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (the Company) is a Maryland corporation focused on investing
in, financing and managing residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and mortgage
loans. The Company invests in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) for which a U.S.
Government Agency such as the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), the Federal
National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(Freddie Mac) guarantees payments of principal and interest on the securities (collectively
Agency RMBS). The Companys Agency RMBS investments include mortgage pass-through securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs). The Company also invests in RMBS that are not issued
or guaranteed by a U.S. government Agency (non-Agency RMBS), commercial mortgage-backed
securities (CMBS), and residential and commercial mortgage loans. The Company is externally
managed and advised by Invesco Advisers, Inc. (the Manager), a registered investment adviser and
an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd. (Invesco), a global investment management
company.
The Company conducts its business through IAS Operating Partnership LP (the Operating
Partnership) as its sole general partner. As of June 30, 2011, the Company owned 98.5% of the
Operating Partnership and Invesco Investments (Bermuda) Ltd., a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of
Invesco, owned the remaining 1.5%.
The Company finances its Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and CMBS investments through short-term
borrowings structured as repurchase agreements. The Manager has secured commitments for the Company
with a number of repurchase agreement counterparties. In addition, the Company had financed its
CMBS portfolio with financings under the U.S. governments Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan
Facility (TALF) which were repaid and replaced with repurchase agreements during 2010. The
Company has also financed its investments in certain non-Agency RMBS, CMBS and residential and
commercial mortgage loans by contributing capital to a partnership that invests in the public
private investments funds (the PPIF) managed by the Companys Manager. In addition, the Company
may use other sources of financing including committed borrowing facilities and other private
financing.
The Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for U.S. federal
income tax purposes under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code),
commencing with the Companys taxable year ended December 31, 2009. To maintain the Companys REIT
qualification, the Company is generally required to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income
to its shareholders annually.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Quarterly Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation
S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations of the
Company for the interim periods presented have been included. Certain disclosures included in the
Companys annual report are not required to be included on an interim basis in the companys
quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q. The Company has condensed or omitted these disclosures. The
interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Companys annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 which was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) on March 14, 2011. The results of operations for the period ended June 30,
2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other
future period.
5
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to U.S. GAAP. The preparation of
consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes. Examples of estimates include, but are not limited to, estimates of the
fair values of financial instruments, interest income on mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and
other-than-temporary impairment charges. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments that have original or remaining maturity
dates of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. At June 30, 2011, the Company
had cash and cash equivalents, including amounts restricted, in excess of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, deposit insurance limit of $250,000 per institution. The Company
mitigates its risk of loss by placing cash and cash equivalents with numerous major financial
institutions.
Deferred Offering Costs
The Company records costs associated with stock offerings as a reduction in additional paid in
capital. The Company includes deferred offering costs in other assets.
Underwriting Commissions and Costs
Underwriting commissions and direct costs incurred in connection with the Companys initial
public offering (IPO) and subsequent follow-on common stock offerings are reflected as a
reduction of additional paid-in-capital.
Repurchase Agreements
The Company finances its Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and its CMBS investment portfolio
through the use of repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements are treated as collateralized
financing transactions and are carried at their contractual amounts, including accrued interest, as
specified in the respective agreements.
In instances where the Company acquires Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS or CMBS through
repurchase agreements with the same counterparty from whom the Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS or CMBS
were purchased, the Company accounts for the purchase commitment and repurchase agreement on a net
basis and records a forward commitment to purchase Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS or CMBS as a
derivative instrument if the transaction does not comply with the criteria for gross presentation.
All of the following criteria must be met for gross presentation in the circumstance where the
repurchase assets are financed with the same counterparty:
|
|
|
the initial transfer of and repurchase financing cannot be contractually
contingent; |
|
|
|
the repurchase financing entered into between the parties provides full recourse
to the transferee and the repurchase price is fixed; |
|
|
|
the financial asset has an active market and the transfer is executed at market
rates; and |
|
|
|
the repurchase agreement and financial asset do not mature simultaneously. |
6
If the transaction complies with the criteria for gross presentation, the Company records the
assets and the related financing on a gross basis on its balance sheet, and the corresponding
interest income and interest expense in its statements of operations. Such forward commitments are
recorded at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in income. Additionally,
the Company records the cash portion of its investment in Agency RMBS and non-Agency RMBS as a
mortgage related receivable from the counterparty on its balance sheet.
For assets representing available-for-sale investment securities any change in fair value is
reported through consolidated other comprehensive income (loss) with the exception of impairment
losses, which are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.
Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010, the FASB updated guidance entitled, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements. The guidance required a number of additional disclosures regarding fair value
measurements. Specifically, entities should disclose: (1) the amount of significant transfers
between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers; (2)
the reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3; and (3) information in the reconciliation of
recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis.
Except for the requirement to disclose information about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements on a gross basis, all the
amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2009. The Company adopted these provisions in preparing its Consolidated Financial Statements for
the period ended March 31, 2010. The adoption of these provisions only affected the disclosure
requirements for fair value measurements and as a result had no impact on the Companys
consolidated statements of operations and consolidated balance sheets.
The Company discloses the fair value of its financial instruments according to a fair value
hierarchy (Levels 1, 2, and 3, as defined). In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company is required
to provide enhanced disclosures regarding instruments in the Level 3 category (which require
significant management judgment), including a separate reconciliation of the beginning and ending
balances for each major category of assets and liabilities.
Additionally, U.S. GAAP permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value (the fair value option). Unrealized gains and losses on items
for which the fair value option has been elected are irrevocably recognized in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date.
During 2009, the Company elected the fair value option for its investments in unconsolidated
limited partnerships. The Company has the one-time option to elect fair value for these financial
assets on the election date. The changes in the fair value of these instruments are recorded in
equity in earnings and fair value change in unconsolidated limited partnerships in the consolidated
statements of operations.
Securities
The Company designates securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading
depending on its ability and intent to hold such securities to maturity. Trading and securities
available-for-sale are reported at fair value, while securities held-to-maturity are reported at
amortized cost. Although the Company generally intends to hold most of its RMBS and CMBS until
maturity, the Company may, from time to time, sell any of its RMBS or CMBS as part of its overall
management of its investment portfolio and as such will classify its RMBS and CMBS as
available-for-sale securities.
All securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value, based on market
prices from third-party sources, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and
reported as a separate component of shareholders equity. When applicable, included with
available-for-sale securities are forward purchase commitments on to be announced securities
(TBA). The Company records TBA purchases on the trade date and the corresponding payable is
recorded as an outstanding liability as a payable for investments purchased until the settlement
date of the transaction. This is presented in the Investment related payable line item on the
consolidated balance sheet.
7
The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly
basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. The
determination of whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired involves judgments and
assumptions based on subjective and objective factors. Consideration is given to (i) the length of
time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition
and near-term prospects of recovery, in fair value of the security, and (iii) the Companys intent
and ability to retain its investment in the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for
any anticipated recovery in fair value.
For debt securities, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment related to a credit
loss or impairments on securities that the Company has the intent or for which it is more likely
than not that the Company will need to sell before recovery are recognized in earnings and
reflected as a reduction in the cost basis of the security. The amount of the other-than-temporary
impairment on debt securities related to other factors is recorded consistent with changes in the
fair value of all other available-for-sale securities as a component of consolidated shareholders
equity in other comprehensive income or loss with no change to the cost basis of the security.
Interest Income Recognition
Interest income on available-for-sale MBS, which includes accretion of discounts and
amortization of premiums on such MBS, is recognized over the life of the investment using the
effective interest method. Management estimates, at the time of purchase, the future expected cash
flows and determines the effective interest rate based on these estimated cash flows and the
Companys purchase price. As needed, these estimated cash flows are updated and a revised yield is
computed based on the current amortized cost of the investment. In estimating these cash flows,
there are a number of assumptions subject to uncertainties and contingencies, including the rate
and timing of principal payments (prepayments, repurchases, defaults and liquidations), the pass
through or coupon rate and interest rate fluctuations. In addition, management must use its
judgment to estimate interest payment shortfalls due to delinquencies on the underlying mortgage
loans. These uncertainties and contingencies are difficult to predict and are subject to future
events that may impact managements estimates and its interest income. Security transactions are
recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are determined
based upon the specific identification method and recorded as gain (loss) on sale of
available-for-sale securities in the consolidated statement of operations.
Investments in Unconsolidated Limited Partnerships
The Company has investments in unconsolidated limited partnerships. In circumstances where the
Company has a non-controlling interest but is deemed to be able to exert significant influence over
the affairs of the enterprise the Company utilizes the equity method of accounting. Under the
equity method of accounting, the initial investment is increased each period for additional capital
contributions and a proportionate share of the entitys earnings and decreased for cash
distributions and a proportionate share of the entitys losses.
The Company elected the fair value option for its investments in unconsolidated limited
partnerships. The election for investments in unconsolidated limited partnerships was made upon
their initial recognition in the financial statements. The Company has elected the fair value
option for the investments in unconsolidated limited partnerships for the purpose of enhancing the
transparency of its financial condition.
The Company measures the fair value of the investments in unconsolidated limited partnerships
on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investments as permitted in guidance effective
for the interim and annual periods ended after December 15, 2009.
Dividends and Distributions Payable
Dividends and distributions payable represent dividends declared at the balance sheet date
which are payable to common shareholders and distributions declared at the balance sheet date which
are payable to non-controlling interest common unit holders of the Operating Partnership,
respectively.
8
Earnings per Share
The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net income for the period by
weighted-average shares of the Companys common stock outstanding for that period. Diluted income
per share takes into account the effect of dilutive instruments, such as units of limited
partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (OP Units), and unvested restricted stock, but
uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of incremental shares that
are to be added to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income, as presented in the consolidated statements
of operations, adjusted for changes in unrealized gains or losses on available for sale securities
and changes in the fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges.
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments
U.S. GAAP provides disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedging activities with the
intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (i) how and why
an entity uses derivative instruments; (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for; and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. U.S. GAAP requires qualitative
disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about
the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about
credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments.
The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for
changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the
Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting
and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge
accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair
value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as
interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a
hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted
transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the
foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally
provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with
the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are
attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged
forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts, such
as credit default swaps, that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risk, even though
hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting under U.S.
GAAP.
Income Taxes
The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT, commencing with the Companys taxable year ended
December 31, 2009. Accordingly, the Company will generally not be subject to U.S. federal and
applicable state and local corporate income tax to the extent that the Company makes qualifying
distributions to its shareholders, and provided the Company satisfies on a continuing basis,
through actual investment and operating results, the REIT requirements including certain asset,
income, distribution and stock ownership tests. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, and does
not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, it will be subject to U.S. federal, state and
local income taxes and may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the subsequent four taxable
years following the year in which the Company lost its REIT qualification. Accordingly, the
Companys failure to qualify as a REIT could have a material adverse impact on its results of
operations and amounts available for distribution to its shareholders.
A REITs dividend paid deduction for qualifying dividends to the Companys shareholders is
computed using its taxable income as opposed to net income reported on the consolidated financial
statements. Taxable income, generally, will differ from net income reported on the consolidated
financial statements because the determination of taxable income is based on tax regulations and
not financial accounting principles.
9
The Company may elect to treat certain of its future subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries
(TRS). In general, a TRS may hold assets and engage in activities that the Company cannot hold or
engage in directly and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate-related business.
A TRS is subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes.
While a TRS will generate net income, a TRS can declare dividends to the Company which will be
included in its taxable income and necessitate a distribution to its shareholders. Conversely, if
the Company retains earnings at a TRS level, no distribution is required and the Company can
increase book equity of the consolidated entity. The Company has no adjustments regarding its tax
accounting treatment of any uncertainties. The Company expects to recognize interest and penalties
related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense, which will be included in
general and administrative expense.
Share-Based Compensation
On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted an equity incentive plan under which its independent
directors, as part of their compensation for serving as directors, are eligible to receive
quarterly restricted stock awards. In addition, the Company may compensate the officers and
employees of the Manager under this plan pursuant to the management agreement.
Share-based compensation arrangements include share options, restricted share plans,
performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.
Compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions are recognized in the consolidated
financial statements, based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued on the
date of grant, for awards to the Companys independent directors. Compensation related to stock
awards to officers and employees of the Manager are recorded at the estimated fair value of the
award during the vesting period. The Company makes an upward or downward adjustment to compensation
expense for the difference in the fair value at the date of grant and the date the award was
earned.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Effective as of August 27, 2010, the Company implemented a dividend reinvestment and stock
purchase plan (the Plan). Under the terms of the Plan, shareholders who participate in the Plan
may purchase shares of common stock directly from the Company. Plan participants may also
automatically reinvest all or a portion of their dividends for additional shares of stock.
Reclassifications
The presentation of certain prior period reported amounts has been reclassified to be
consistent with the current presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income or
equity attributable to common shareholders.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Improving Disclosures
about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06). ASU 2010-06 amends Topic 820 to require a number of
additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 requires
entities to disclose: (1) the amount of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the
fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers; (2) the reasons for any transfers in or
out of Level 3; and (3) information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. ASU 2010-06 also clarifies existing
fair value disclosures about the appropriate level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation
techniques for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2
or Level 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures were effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures
about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for
interim periods within those fiscal years. The additional disclosure requirements were incorporated
into Note 7, Financial Instruments.
10
In April 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-03, Reconsideration of
Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements (ASU 2011-03). ASU 2011-03 simplifies the accounting
for financial assets transferred under repurchase agreements (repos) and similar arrangements, by
eliminating the transferors ability criterion from the assessment of effective control over those
assets. This guidance is effective fir fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December
15, 2011. The Company does not believe that the adoption of the amended guidance will have a
significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS (ASU 2011-04).
ASU 2011-04 amends Topic 820 and does not modify the requirements for when fair value measurements
apply; rather, it clarifies the Boards intent about the application of existing fair value
measurement requirements, and changes to a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair
value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For public entities, this
guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early
application by public entities is not permitted. The Company does not anticipate any material
impact from this guidance.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-05, Presentation of
Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 amends Topic 220 and eliminates the option to
present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in
stockholders equity, which is the Companys current presentation, and also requires presentation
of reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the
financial statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after December 15, 2011, and is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations, though it will change the Companys financial statement
presentation.
Note 3 Mortgage-Backed Securities
All of the Companys MBS are classified as available-for-sale and, as such, are reported at
fair value, which is determined by obtaining valuations from an independent source. If the fair
value of a security is not available from a dealer or third-party pricing service, or such data
appears unreliable, the Company may estimate the fair value of the security using a variety of
methods including other pricing services, repurchase agreement pricing, discounted cash flow
analysis, matrix pricing, option adjusted spread models and other fundamental analysis of
observable market factors. At June 30, 2011, all of the Companys MBS values were based on values
obtained from third-party pricing services. The following tables present certain information about
the Companys investment portfolio at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gain/ |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
|
(Discount) |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Coupon (1) |
|
|
Yield (2) |
|
Agency RMBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 year fixed-rate |
|
|
1,996,178 |
|
|
|
106,361 |
|
|
|
2,102,539 |
|
|
|
15,732 |
|
|
|
2,118,271 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
3.24 |
% |
30 year fixed-rate |
|
|
4,672,172 |
|
|
|
320,753 |
|
|
|
4,992,925 |
|
|
|
45,550 |
|
|
|
5,038,475 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
% |
|
|
3.99 |
% |
ARM |
|
|
118,688 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
121,669 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
122,763 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
3.22 |
% |
Hybrid ARM |
|
|
1,233,212 |
|
|
|
27,161 |
|
|
|
1,260,373 |
|
|
|
11,102 |
|
|
|
1,271,475 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Agency |
|
|
8,020,250 |
|
|
|
457,256 |
|
|
|
8,477,506 |
|
|
|
73,478 |
|
|
|
8,550,984 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS-CMO |
|
|
353,790 |
|
|
|
(278,533 |
) |
|
|
75,257 |
|
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
78,787 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
6.23 |
% |
Non-Agency MBS |
|
|
2,757,121 |
|
|
|
(408,616 |
) |
|
|
2,348,505 |
|
|
|
(28,085 |
) |
|
|
2,320,420 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
CMBS |
|
|
1,229,100 |
|
|
|
(6,617 |
) |
|
|
1,222,483 |
|
|
|
(16,813 |
) |
|
|
1,205,670 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
5.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12,360,261 |
|
|
|
(236,510 |
) |
|
|
12,123,751 |
|
|
|
32,110 |
|
|
|
12,155,861 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
% |
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net weighted average coupon (WAC) is presented net of servicing and other fees. |
|
(2) |
|
Average yield incorporates future prepayment and loss assumptions. |
|
(3) |
|
The Non-agency MBS held by the Company is 84.1% fixed rate and 15.9% floating rate, based on fair value. |
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gain/ |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
|
(Discount) |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Coupon (1) |
|
|
Yield (2) |
|
Agency RMBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 year fixed-rate |
|
|
1,789,891 |
|
|
|
99,611 |
|
|
|
1,889,502 |
|
|
|
(8,688 |
) |
|
|
1,880,814 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
% |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
30 year fixed-rate |
|
|
2,059,475 |
|
|
|
163,332 |
|
|
|
2,222,807 |
|
|
|
6,771 |
|
|
|
2,229,578 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
% |
|
|
3.57 |
% |
ARM |
|
|
21,926 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
23,006 |
|
|
|
(494 |
) |
|
|
22,512 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
2.55 |
% |
Hybrid ARM |
|
|
70,253 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
71,865 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
72,313 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Agency |
|
|
3,941,545 |
|
|
|
265,635 |
|
|
|
4,207,180 |
|
|
|
(1,963 |
) |
|
|
4,205,217 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS-CMO |
|
|
57,232 |
|
|
|
(30,248 |
) |
|
|
26,984 |
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
28,805 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
|
3.59 |
% |
Non-Agency RMBS: |
|
|
1,168,797 |
|
|
|
(339,501 |
) |
|
|
829,296 |
|
|
|
17,072 |
|
|
|
846,368 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
5.47 |
% |
CMBS |
|
|
488,246 |
|
|
|
(4,640 |
) |
|
|
483,606 |
|
|
|
14,337 |
|
|
|
497,943 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
% |
|
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,655,820 |
|
|
|
(108,754 |
) |
|
|
5,547,066 |
|
|
|
31,267 |
|
|
|
5,578,333 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
% |
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net weighted average coupon (WAC) is presented net of servicing and other fees. |
|
(2) |
|
Average yield incorporates future prepayment and loss assumptions. |
|
(3) |
|
The Non-agency MBS held by the Company is 75.8% fixed rate and 24.2% floating rate, based on fair value. |
The components of the carrying value of the Companys investment portfolio at June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010 are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Principal balance |
|
|
12,360,261 |
|
|
|
5,655,820 |
|
Unamortized premium |
|
|
476,535 |
|
|
|
271,728 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(713,045 |
) |
|
|
(380,482 |
) |
Gross unrealized gains |
|
|
141,465 |
|
|
|
75,231 |
|
Gross unrealized losses |
|
|
(109,355 |
) |
|
|
(43,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
12,155,861 |
|
|
|
5,578,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the Companys investment
portfolio, at fair value, according to estimated weighted average life classifications as of June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Less than one year |
|
|
9,806 |
|
|
|
26,214 |
|
Greater than one year and less than five years |
|
|
6,112,694 |
|
|
|
3,304,668 |
|
Greater than or equal to five years |
|
|
6,033,361 |
|
|
|
2,247,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12,155,861 |
|
|
|
5,578,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value of the
Companys MBS by length of time that such securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Agency RMBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 year fixed-rate |
|
|
859,816 |
|
|
|
(6,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859,816 |
|
|
|
(6,027 |
) |
30 year fixed-rate |
|
|
1,427,539 |
|
|
|
(10,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427,539 |
|
|
|
(10,235 |
) |
ARM |
|
|
38,250 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
7,325 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
45,575 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
Hybrid ARM |
|
|
366,385 |
|
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366,385 |
|
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Agency |
|
|
2,691,990 |
|
|
|
(17,921 |
) |
|
|
7,325 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
2,699,315 |
|
|
|
(18,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS-CMO |
|
|
8,701 |
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,701 |
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
Non-Agency RMBS |
|
|
1,442,438 |
|
|
|
(46,344 |
) |
|
|
26,292 |
|
|
|
(3,790 |
) |
|
|
1,468,730 |
|
|
|
(50,134 |
) |
CMBS |
|
|
759,672 |
|
|
|
(40,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759,672 |
|
|
|
(40,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,902,801 |
|
|
|
(105,337 |
) |
|
|
33,617 |
|
|
|
(4,018 |
) |
|
|
4,936,418 |
|
|
|
(109,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Agency RMBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 year fixed-rate |
|
|
1,039,444 |
|
|
|
(17,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,039,444 |
|
|
|
(17,284 |
) |
30 year fixed-rate |
|
|
802,118 |
|
|
|
(10,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
802,118 |
|
|
|
(10,885 |
) |
ARM |
|
|
14,911 |
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
7,601 |
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
22,512 |
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
Hybrid ARM |
|
|
10,912 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,912 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Agency |
|
|
1,867,385 |
|
|
|
(28,437 |
) |
|
|
7,601 |
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
1,874,986 |
|
|
|
(28,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS-CMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Agency RMBS |
|
|
370,839 |
|
|
|
(13,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,839 |
|
|
|
(13,242 |
) |
CMBS |
|
|
138,037 |
|
|
|
(2,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,037 |
|
|
|
(2,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,376,261 |
|
|
|
(43,720 |
) |
|
|
7,601 |
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
2,383,862 |
|
|
|
(43,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the impact of the Companys MBS on its accumulated other
comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
$ in thousands |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income from investment
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on MBS at beginning of period |
|
|
41,217 |
|
|
|
18,307 |
|
|
|
31,267 |
|
|
|
12,741 |
|
Unrealized gain on MBS, net |
|
|
(9,107 |
) |
|
|
15,613 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
21,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of period |
|
|
32,110 |
|
|
|
33,920 |
|
|
|
32,110 |
|
|
|
33,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company reclassified $774,000 of net
unrealized gains from other comprehensive income into Gain on Sale of Investments as a result of
the Company selling certain investments.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company reclassified $2.9 million of net
unrealized gains from other comprehensive income into Gain on Sale of Investments as a result of
the Company selling certain investments.
The Company assesses its investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least
a quarterly basis. When the fair value of an investment is less than its amortized cost at the
balance sheet date of the reporting period for which impairment is assessed, the impairment is
designated as either temporary or other-than-temporary. In deciding on whether or not a
security is other than temporarily impaired, the Company considers several factors, including the
nature of the investment, communications from the trustees of securitizations regarding the credit
quality of the security, the severity and duration of the impairment, the cause of the impairment,
and the Companys intent that it is more likely than not that the Company can hold the security
until recovery of its cost basis.
The following table presents the other-than-temporary impairments for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
$ in thousands |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Credit related other-than-temporary impairments included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386 |
|
Non-credit related other-than-temporary impairments
recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a roll-forward of the credit loss component of
other-than-temporary impairments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
$ in thousands |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Cumulative credit loss amount at the beginning of the period |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for credit losses for which other-than-temporary
impairment had not been previously recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative credit loss amount at end of period |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents components of interest income on the Companys Agency and
non-Agency portfolio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
For
the three months ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon |
|
|
Amortization)/Discount |
|
|
Interest |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Interest |
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
Income |
|
Agency |
|
|
78,954 |
|
|
|
(15,907 |
) |
|
|
63,047 |
|
Non-Agency |
|
|
25,455 |
|
|
|
9,967 |
|
|
|
35,422 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
10,569 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
10,534 |
|
Other |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
114,956 |
|
|
|
(5,975 |
) |
|
|
108,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon |
|
|
Amortization)/Discount |
|
|
Interest |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Interest |
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
Income |
|
Agency |
|
|
130,312 |
|
|
|
(30,129 |
) |
|
|
100,183 |
|
Non-Agency |
|
|
40,958 |
|
|
|
18,933 |
|
|
|
59,891 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
17,377 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
17,424 |
|
Other |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
188,666 |
|
|
|
(11,149 |
) |
|
|
177,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon |
|
|
Amortization)/Discount |
|
|
Interest |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Interest |
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
Income |
|
Agency |
|
|
14,385 |
|
|
|
(4,895 |
) |
|
|
9,490 |
|
Non-Agency |
|
|
8,756 |
|
|
|
8,334 |
|
|
|
17,090 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
25,709 |
|
|
|
3,498 |
|
|
|
29,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon |
|
|
Amortization)/Discount |
|
|
Interest |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Interest |
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
Income |
|
Agency |
|
|
23,999 |
|
|
|
(8,215 |
) |
|
|
15,784 |
|
Non-Agency |
|
|
13,182 |
|
|
|
13,468 |
|
|
|
26,650 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
4,601 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
4,771 |
|
Other |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
41,794 |
|
|
|
5,423 |
|
|
|
47,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Note 4 Investments in Unconsolidated Limited Partnerships
Invesco Mortgage Recovery Feeder Fund, L.P. and Invesco Mortgage Recovery Loans AIV, L.P.
The Company invested in certain non-Agency RMBS, CMBS and residential and commercial mortgage
loans by contributing equity capital to a legacy securities PPIF managed by the Manager, Invesco
Mortgage Recovery Feeder Fund, L.P. (the Invesco PPIP Fund) that receives financing under the
U.S. governments Public Private Investment Program (PPIP). In addition the Manager identified a
whole loan transaction for the Company, which resulted in the Companys admission into an
alternative investment vehicle, the Invesco Mortgage Recovery Loans AIV, L.P. (AIV). The
Companys initial commitment in the Invesco PPIP Fund and AIV was $25.0 million. The Invesco PPIP
Fund and AIV limited partnership agreements provided for additional subscriptions of limited
partners within six months of the initial closing. During 2009 and 2010, the Invesco PPIP Fund and
AIV accepted additional subscriptions and the Company increased its overall commitment to $100.0
million which effectively increased the Companys initial ownership interest in the Invesco PPIP
Fund and AIV. As of March 31, 2010, the Invesco PPIP Fund stopped accepting investment
subscriptions and was deemed closed. The Company made its first contributions to the Invesco PPIP
Fund in October 2009. In connection with the increase of the Companys interest in the Invesco PPIP
Fund and AIV, the Company is committed to fund approximately $30.7 million of additional capital at
June 30, 2011. The Company realized approximately $3.5 million and $5.6 million of equity in
earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and $1.6 million and $1.8 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The Company also realized $1.6 million and
$1.9 million of unrealized loss from these investments for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, and $44,000 and $260,000 of unrealized appreciation for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
The Companys non-controlling, unconsolidated ownership interests in these entities are
accounted for under the equity method. Capital contributions, distributions, profits and losses of
the Invesco PPIP Fund and AIV are allocated in accordance with the terms of the entities limited
partnership agreements. Such allocations may differ from the stated percentage interests, if any,
as a result of preferred returns and allocation formulas as described in such agreements. The
Company has made the fair value election for its investment in both unconsolidated limited
partnerships. The fair value measurement for the investment in unconsolidated limited partnerships
is based on the net asset value per share of the investment, or its equivalent.
Note 5 Borrowings
Repurchase Agreements
The Company has entered into repurchase agreements to finance the majority of its portfolio of
investments. The repurchase agreements bear interest at a contractually agreed rate. The repurchase
obligations mature and typically reinvest every thirty days to one year and have a weighted average
aggregate interest rate of 0.52% and 0.57% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company entered into a repurchase agreement with a one year
maturity. The facility was subsequently amended and expires in April 2012. These repurchase
agreements are being accounted for as secured borrowings since the Company maintains effective
control of the financed assets. The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the
Companys repurchase agreements at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Rate |
|
Agency RMBS |
|
|
7,174,858 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
3,483,440 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
Non-Agency RBS |
|
|
1,510,666 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
459,979 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
% |
CMBS |
|
|
875,242 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
401,240 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
9,560,766 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
% |
|
|
4,344,659 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Under the repurchase agreements, the respective lender retains the right to mark the
underlying collateral to fair value. A reduction in the value of pledged assets would require the
Company to provide additional collateral or fund margin calls. In addition, the repurchase
agreements are subject to certain financial covenants. The Company is in compliance with these
covenants at June 30, 2011.
The following tables summarize certain characteristics of the Companys repurchase agreements
at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total |
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Company MBS |
|
Repurchase Agreement Counterparties |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Held as Collateral |
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC |
|
|
2,118,108 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
2,347,235 |
|
Nomura Securities International, Inc. |
|
|
996,218 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
699,639 |
|
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC |
|
|
809,187 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
880,658 |
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
|
|
664,506 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
699,452 |
|
RBS Securities Inc. |
|
|
581,275 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
640,571 |
|
JP Morgan Securities Inc. |
|
|
528,132 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
585,193 |
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. |
|
|
502,685 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
534,088 |
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated |
|
|
444,418 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
842,343 |
|
Mitsubishi UFJ Securities (USA), Inc. |
|
|
427,066 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
448,179 |
|
BNP Paribas Securities Corp. |
|
|
406,279 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
422,443 |
|
Barclays Capital Inc. |
|
|
388,502 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
432,872 |
|
UBS Securities Inc. |
|
|
316,790 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
333,696 |
|
CitiGroup Global Markets Inc. |
|
|
277,111 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
302,876 |
|
Banc of America Securities LLC |
|
|
262,788 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
292,023 |
|
Guggenheim Liquidity Services, LLC |
|
|
246,880 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
258,754 |
|
Mizuho Securities USA Inc. |
|
|
181,080 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
200,072 |
|
Jefferies & Company, Inc |
|
|
145,752 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
153,171 |
|
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Financial Services LLC |
|
|
141,737 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
148,341 |
|
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. |
|
|
95,195 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
149,734 |
|
Royal Bank of Canada |
|
|
27,057 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
35,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
9,560,766 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
10,407,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total |
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Company MBS |
|
Repurchase Agreement Counterparties |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Held as Collateral |
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC |
|
|
974,369 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
1,072,719 |
|
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC |
|
|
614,365 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
710,529 |
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated |
|
|
468,748 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
511,022 |
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. |
|
|
463,087 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
493,533 |
|
Barclays Capital Inc. |
|
|
287,469 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
322,035 |
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
|
|
273,369 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
291,512 |
|
Mitsubishi UFJ Securities (USA), Inc. |
|
|
261,594 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
273,131 |
|
BNP Paribas Securities Corp. |
|
|
228,566 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
239,218 |
|
JP Morgan Securities Inc. |
|
|
227,261 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
255,403 |
|
RBS Securities Inc. |
|
|
210,332 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
241,331 |
|
Banc of America Securities LLC |
|
|
200,081 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
220,018 |
|
Nomura Securities International, Inc. |
|
|
135,418 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
144,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,344,659 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
4,775,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company MBS held by counterparties as security for repurchase agreements was $10.4 billion and
$4.8 billion at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. This represents a collateral
ratio (Company MBS Held as Collateral/Amount Outstanding) of 109% and 110% respectively. The
decline in the collateral ratio was due to the change in asset mix as the Company had a higher
percentage of credit assets that generally have lower advance rates.
Cash collateral held by the counterparties at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $85.0
million and $81.3 million, respectively. In addition, cash collateral held by the Company at June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately $29.1 million and $11.1 million, respectively.
16
Note 6 Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic
conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and
operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic
risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount,
sources, and duration of its investments, debt funding, and the use of derivative financial
instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage
exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known
and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Companys
derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration
of the Companys known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments
principally related to the Companys investments and borrowings.
The Company also utilizes credit derivatives such as credit default swaps (CDS) to provide
credit event protection based on a financial index or specific security in exchange for receiving a
fixed-rate fee or premium over the term of the contract. These instruments enable the Company to
synthetically assume the credit risk of a reference security, portfolio of securities or index of
securities. The counterparty pays a premium to the Company and the Company agrees to make a payment
to compensate the counterparty for losses upon the occurrence of a specified credit event.
Although contract-specific, credit events generally include bankruptcy, failure to pay,
restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium. Upon the
occurrence of a defined credit event, the difference between the value of the reference obligation
and the CDSs notional amount is recorded as a realized loss in the statement of operations.
Our only CDS contract was entered into on December 31, 2010 where the Company sold protection
on a specific pool of non-Agency RMBS that exceed a specified loss limit of 25% for a stated fixed
rate fee of 3%. The Companys maximum exposure is the unpaid principal balance of the underlying
RMBS that exceeds the specified loss limit. The Company is required to post cash collateral to
secure potential loss payments.
At June 30, 2011, the open CDS sold by the Company is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousand |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Fair value amount |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
|
128,760 |
|
|
|
149,964 |
|
Maximum potential amount of future undiscounted payments |
|
|
96,570 |
|
|
|
112,500 |
|
Recourse provisions with third parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral held by counterparty |
|
|
19,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company finances its activities primarily through repurchase agreements, which are
generally settled on a short-term basis, usually from one to three months. At each settlement date,
the Company refinances each repurchase agreement at the market interest rate at that time. Since
the interest rate on its repurchase agreements change on a one to twelve month basis, the Company
is exposed to changing interest rates. The Companys objectives in using interest rate derivatives
are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To
accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest
rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the
receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate
payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualifying as
cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently
reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.
The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of
17
the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the three months ended June 30,
2011, the Company recorded $197,000 of unrealized swap losses in earnings as hedge ineffectiveness
attributable primarily to differences in the reset dates on the Companys swaps versus the
refinancing dates of certain of its repurchase agreements. For the three months ended June 30,
2010, the Company recorded $10,000 of unrealized swap losses in earnings.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded $202,000 of unrealized swap
losses in earnings as hedge ineffectiveness attributable primarily to differences in the reset
dates on the Companys swaps versus the refinancing dates of certain of its repurchase agreements.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded $35,000 of unrealized swap losses in
earnings.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be
reclassified to interest expense as interest is accrued and paid on the Companys repurchase
agreements. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $134.6 million
will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
The Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted
transactions over a maximum period of 119 months.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had the following interest rate derivatives outstanding, that
were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fixed Pay |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Remaining Interest Rate Swap Term |
|
$ in thousands |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Years) |
|
1 year or less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 1 year and less than 3 years |
|
|
475,000 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
|
Greater than 3 years and less than 5 years |
|
|
5,100,000 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
|
Greater than 5 years |
|
|
1,350,000 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,925,000 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011, the Companys counterparties held approximately $19.8 million of cash
margin deposits and approximately $211.2 million in Agency RMBS as collateral against its swap
contracts. The cash is classified as restricted cash and the Agency RMBS is included in the total
mortgage-backed securities on our consolidated balance sheet.
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of the Companys derivative financial instruments, as
well as their classification on the balance sheet as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
|
|
|
swap asset |
|
|
17,446 |
|
|
swap asset |
|
|
33,255 |
|
|
liability |
|
|
139,129 |
|
|
liability |
|
|
37,850 |
|
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Income Statement
The table below presents the effect of the Companys derivative financial instruments on the
statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
18
Three months ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of loss |
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
accumulated |
|
|
Amount of loss |
|
|
recognized in |
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
Amount of loss |
|
|
OCI into |
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
income on |
|
|
Amount of loss |
|
type for |
|
recognized |
|
|
income |
|
|
accumulated OCI into |
|
|
derivative |
|
|
recognized in income |
|
cash flow |
|
in OCI on derivative |
|
|
(effective |
|
|
income (effective |
|
|
(ineffective |
|
|
on derivative |
|
hedge |
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
(ineffective portion |
|
Interest Rate Swap |
|
|
170,915 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
23,829 |
|
|
Other Expense |
|
|
197 |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of loss |
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
accumulated |
|
|
Amount of loss |
|
|
recognized in |
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
Amount of loss |
|
|
OCI into |
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
income on |
|
|
Amount of loss |
|
type for |
|
recognized |
|
|
income |
|
|
accumulated OCI into |
|
|
derivative |
|
|
recognized in income |
|
cash flow |
|
in OCI on derivative |
|
|
(effective |
|
|
income (effective |
|
|
(ineffective |
|
|
on derivative |
|
hedge |
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
(ineffective portion |
|
Interest Rate Swap |
|
|
149,041 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
32,156 |
|
|
Other Expense |
|
|
202 |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of loss |
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
accumulated |
|
|
Amount of loss |
|
|
recognized in |
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
Amount of loss |
|
|
OCI into |
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
income on |
|
|
Amount of loss |
|
type for |
|
recognized |
|
|
income |
|
|
accumulated OCI into |
|
|
derivative |
|
|
recognized in income |
|
cash flow |
|
in OCI on derivative |
|
|
(effective |
|
|
income (effective |
|
|
(ineffective |
|
|
on derivative |
|
hedge |
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
(ineffective portion |
|
Interest Rate Swap |
|
|
25,201 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
Other Expense |
|
|
10 |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of loss |
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
accumulated |
|
|
Amount of loss |
|
|
recognized in |
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
Amount of loss |
|
|
OCI into |
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
income on |
|
|
Amount of loss |
|
type for |
|
recognized |
|
|
income |
|
|
accumulated OCI into |
|
|
derivative |
|
|
recognized in income |
|
cash flow |
|
in OCI on derivative |
|
|
(effective |
|
|
income (effective |
|
|
(ineffective |
|
|
on derivative |
|
hedge |
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
|
(ineffective portion |
|
Interest Rate Swap |
|
|
32,347 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
4,870 |
|
|
Other Expense |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain recognized in income on derivative |
|
Derivative |
|
Location of gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
not designated as |
|
recognized in income |
|
Three months |
|
|
Three months |
|
hedging instrument |
|
on derivative |
|
ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
ended June 30, 2010 |
|
CDS Contract |
|
Gain on credit default swap |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain recognized in income on derivative |
|
Derivative |
|
Location of gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
not designated as |
|
recognized in income |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
hedging instrument |
|
on derivative |
|
ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
ended June 30, 2010 |
|
CDS Contract |
|
Gain on credit default swap |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties. Some of those
agreements contain a provision where if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including
default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the
Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.
19
The Company has an agreement with one of its derivative counterparties that contains a
provision where if the Companys net asset value declines by certain percentages over specified
time periods, then the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The
Company also has an agreement with one of its derivative counterparties that contains a provision
where if the Companys shareholders equity declines by certain percentages over specified time
periods, then the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations.
The Company has an agreement with one of its derivative counterparties that contain a
provision where if the Company fails to maintain a minimum shareholders equity or market value of
$100 million and $80 million, respectively, then the Company could be declared in default on its
derivative obligations.
As of June 30, 2011, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes
accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements
was $134.3 million. The Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its
derivative counterparties and has posted collateral of approximately $19.8 million of cash and
$211.2 million of Agency RMBS. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at June 30,
2011, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their
termination value. The Company was in compliance with all of the financial provisions of these
agreements through June 30, 2011.
Note 7 Financial Instruments
U.S. GAAP defines fair value, provides a consistent framework for measuring fair value under
U.S. GAAP and Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820 expands fair value financial
statement disclosure requirements. ASC Topic 820 does not require any new fair value measurements
and only applies to accounting pronouncements that already require or permit fair value measures,
except for standards that relate to share-based payments.
Valuation techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs
reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the
Companys market assumptions. The three levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value
drivers are observable. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers. |
The fair values on a recurring basis of the Companys MBS and interest rate hedges based on
the level of inputs at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total at |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,155,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,155,861 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated limited partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,177 |
|
|
|
48,177 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,446 |
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
19,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,173,307 |
|
|
|
49,862 |
|
|
|
12,223,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total at |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,578,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,578,333 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated limited partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,725 |
|
|
|
54,725 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,611,588 |
|
|
|
54,725 |
|
|
|
5,666,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For more detail about the fair value of our MBS and type of securities, see Note 3 in the
unaudited consolidated financial statements. |
The following table presents additional information about the Companys investments in
unconsolidated limited partnerships which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which
the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
|
54,725 |
|
|
|
4,128 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
8,314 |
|
|
|
56,357 |
|
Sales and settlements |
|
|
(18,593 |
) |
|
|
(14,036 |
) |
Total net gains / (losses) included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains/(losses), net |
|
|
5,602 |
|
|
|
4,780 |
|
Unrealized gains/(losses), net |
|
|
(1,871 |
) |
|
|
3,496 |
|
Unrealized gain/(losses), net included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
48,177 |
|
|
|
54,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the repurchase agreements is based on an expected present value
technique. This method discounts future estimated cash flows using rates the Company determined
best reflect current market interest rates that would be offered for loans with similar
characteristics and credit quality. At June 30, 2011 the repurchase agreements had a fair value of
$9.6 billion and a carrying value of $9.6 billion. At December 31, 2010 the repurchase agreements
had a fair value of $4.3 billion and a carrying value of $4.3 billion.
Note 8 Related Party Transactions
The Company is externally managed and advised by the Manager. Pursuant to the terms of the
management agreement, the Manager provides the Company with its management team, including its
officers, along with appropriate support personnel. Each of the Companys officers is an employee
of Invesco or one of Invescos affiliates. The Company does not have any employees. With the
exception of the Companys Chief Financial Officer, the Manager is not obligated to dedicate any of
its employees exclusively to the Company, nor is the Manager or its employees obligated to dedicate
any specific portion of its or their time to the Companys business. The Manager is at all times
subject to the supervision and oversight of the Companys board of directors and has only such
functions and authority as the Company delegates to it.
Management Fee
The Company pays the Manager a management fee equal to 1.50% of the Companys shareholders
equity per annum, which is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears. For purposes of
calculating the management fee, shareholders equity is equal to the sum of the net proceeds from
all issuances of equity securities since inception (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such
issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance), plus retained earnings at the end of
the most recently completed calendar quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity
compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods), less any amount paid to repurchase
common stock since inception, and excluding any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do
not affect realized net income (regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss,
or in net income).
21
This amount will be adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in
U.S. GAAP, and certain non-cash items after discussions between the Manager and the Companys
independent directors and approval by a majority of the Companys independent directors.
The Manager has agreed to reduce (but not below zero) the management fee payable by the
Company under the management agreement with respect to any equity investment the Company may make
in the Invesco PPIP Fund managed by the Manager. The fee reduction occurs at the PPIP level.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred management fees of
approximately $5.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively of which approximately $5.8 million and
$1.8 million, respectively, was accrued but had not been paid.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred management fees of
approximately $9.7 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Expense Reimbursement
Pursuant to the management agreement, the Company is required to reimburse the Manager for
operating expenses related to the Company incurred by the Manager, including certain salary
expenses and other expenses related to legal, accounting, due diligence and other services. The
Companys reimbursement obligation is not subject to any dollar limitation.
The Company incurred costs, originally paid by Invesco, of approximately $1.3 million and $2.7
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to approximately
$1.5 and $2.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Approximately
$1.0 million and $2.2 million was expensed for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, compared to $893,000 and $1.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010, respectively. Approximately $383,000 and $525,000 was charged against equity as a cost of
raising capital for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to
$619,000 and $856,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
Termination Fee
A termination fee is due to the Manager upon termination of the management agreement by the
Company equal to three times the sum of the average annual management fee earned by the Manager
during the 24-month period prior to such termination, calculated as of the end of the most
recently completed fiscal quarter.
Note 9 Shareholders Equity
Securities Convertible into Shares of Common Stock
The limited partner who holds units of the Operating Partnership (OP Units) has the right to
cause the Operating Partnership to redeem their OP Units for cash equal to the market value of an
equivalent number of shares of common stock, or at the Companys option, the Company may purchase
their OP Units by issuing one share of common stock for each OP Unit redeemed. The Company has also
adopted an equity incentive plan which includes the ability of the Company to grant securities
convertible into the Companys common stock to the independent directors and the executive officers
of the Company and the personnel of the Manager.
Registration Rights
The Company entered into a registration rights agreement with regard to the common stock and
OP Units owned by the Manager and Invesco Investments (Bermuda) Ltd., respectively, upon completion
of the Companys IPO and any shares of common stock that the Manager may elect to receive under the
management agreement or otherwise. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, the Company has
granted to the Manager and Invesco Investments (Bermuda) Ltd., (i) unlimited demand registration rights to have the shares
purchased by the Manager
22
or granted to it in the future and the shares that the Company may issue
upon redemption of the OP Units purchased by Invesco Investments (Bermuda) Ltd. registered for
resale, and (ii) in certain circumstances, the right to piggy-back these shares in registration
statements the Company might file in connection with any future public offering so long as the
Company retains the Manager under the management agreement.
Public Offerings
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 1,237,716 shares of common stock at
an average price of $22.62 under the Companys Direct Stock Purchase Plan (DSPP) with total
proceeds of approximately $27.8 million, net of issuance costs.
On June 23, 2011, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 17,000,000 shares of
common stock and an issuance of an additional 2,550,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the
underwriters full exercise of their over-allotment option at $20.15 per share. Net proceeds to the
Company were $388.8 million, net of issuance costs of approximately $5.1 million.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company established the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan for grants of restricted common stock
and other equity based awards to the independent directors and the executive officers of the
Company and personnel of the Manager (the Incentive Plan). Under the Incentive Plan, a total of
1,000,000 shares of common stock are currently reserved for issuance. Unless terminated earlier,
the Incentive Plan will terminate in 2019, but will continue to govern the unexpired awards. The
Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $34,000 and approximately $34,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company recognized compensation
expense of approximately $68,000 and approximately $53,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company issued
1,467 and 921 shares, respectively, of restricted stock pursuant to the Incentive Plan to the
Companys non-executive directors. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company
issued 2,895 and 1,755 shares, respectively, of restricted stock pursuant to the Incentive Plan to
the Companys non-executive directors. The fair market value of the shares granted was determined
by the closing stock market price on the date of the grant.
On March 17, 2010, the Company awarded 5,725 restricted stock units to the executive officers
of the Company who are employees of the Manager. On March 14, 2011, the Company issued 18,419
restricted stock units to non-executive employees of the Manager. The restricted stock units vest
equally in four installments on the anniversary date of each award. Compensation related to stock
awards to officers and employees of the Manager are recorded at the estimated fair value of the
award during the vesting period. The Company makes an upward or downward adjustment to compensation
expense for the difference in the fair value at the date of grant and the date the award was
earned. The Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $28,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 related to awards to officers and employees of the Manager.
The Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $37,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 related to awards to officers and employees of the Manager.
On March 17, 2011, the Company issued 896 shares of common stock (net of tax withholding) in
exchange for 1,430 restricted stock units which vested under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. The
remaining restricted stock units awarded to the executive officers of the Company on March 17, 2010
were forfeited in March 2011.
Dividends
On June 9, 2011, the Company declared a dividend of $0.97 per share of common stock. The
dividend was paid on July 28, 2011 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on June
17, 2011.
23
Note 10 Earnings per Share
Earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is computed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
$ in thousands |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator (Income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
|
72,998 |
|
|
|
20,750 |
|
|
|
125,246 |
|
|
|
32,799 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to non-controlling interest |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive net income available to shareholders |
|
|
74,404 |
|
|
|
22,059 |
|
|
|
128,103 |
|
|
|
35,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator (Weighted Average Shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares available to common shareholders |
|
|
73,486 |
|
|
|
22,808 |
|
|
|
62,731 |
|
|
|
19,266 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
OP Units |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive Shares |
|
|
74,929 |
|
|
|
24,239 |
|
|
|
64,167 |
|
|
|
20,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 Non-controlling Interest Operating Partnership
Non-controlling interest represents the aggregate OP Units in the Operating Partnership held
by limited partners (the Unit Holders). Income allocated to the non-controlling interest is based
on the Unit Holders ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership. The ownership percentage is
determined by dividing the number of OP Units held by the Unit Holders by the total number of
dilutive shares of common stock. The issuance of common stock (Share or Shares) or OP Units
changes the percentage ownership of both the Unit Holders and the holders of common stock. Since an
OP unit is generally redeemable for cash or Shares at the option of the Company, it is deemed to be
equivalent to a Share. Therefore, such transactions are treated as capital transactions and result
in an allocation between shareholders equity and non-controlling interest in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet to account for the change in the ownership of the underlying equity in
the Operating Partnership. As of June 30, 2011 and 2010, non-controlling interest related to the
outstanding 1,425,000 OP units represented a 1.5% and 5.2% interest in the Operating Partnership,
respectively. Income allocated to the Operating Partnership non-controlling interest for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $1.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
Income allocated to the Operating Partnership non-controlling interest for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $2.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively. For the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, distributions paid to the non-controlling interest were
$1.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
distributions paid to the non-controlling interest were $2.8 million and $2.6 million,
respectively. As of June 30, 2011 and 2010, distributions payable to the non-controlling interest
were approximately $1.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Note 12 Subsequent Events
The Company has reviewed subsequent events occurring through the date that these consolidation
financial statements were issued, and determined that no subsequent events occurred that would
require accrual or additional disclosure.
24
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, or this Report, we refer to Invesco Mortgage Capital
Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries as we, us, our Company, or our, unless we
specifically state otherwise or the context indicates otherwise. We refer to our external manager,
Invesco Advisers, Inc., as our Manager, and we refer to the indirect parent company of our
Manager, Invesco Ltd. (NYSE:IVZ,) together with its consolidated subsidiaries (other than us), as
Invesco.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements, which are included
in Item 1 of this report, as well as the information contained in our most recent Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Forward-Looking Statements
We make forward-looking statements in this Report and other filings we make with the SEC
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such statements are intended to be covered by the
safe harbor provided by the same. Forward-looking statements are subject to substantial risks and
uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond our control. These
forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our
business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans and objectives. When we use
the words believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, plan, continue, intend, should,
may or similar expressions, we intend to identify forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ from those expressed in the Companys forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the impact of any deficiencies in foreclosure practices of third parties and
related delays in the foreclosure process; |
|
|
|
|
our business and investment strategy; |
|
|
|
|
our investment portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
our projected operating results; |
|
|
|
|
actions and initiatives of the U.S. government, including the impact of the
final agreement on the U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit; and changes to U.S.
government policies, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) and our ability to respond to and comply with
such actions, initiatives and changes; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing arrangements and the terms of such
arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
financing and advance rates for our target assets; |
|
|
|
|
changes to our expected leverage; |
|
|
|
|
general volatility of the securities markets in which we invest; |
|
|
|
|
interest rate mismatches between our target assets and our borrowings used to
fund such investments; |
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our cash flow from operations and borrowings to meet our
short-term liquidity needs; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet any margin calls; |
25
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and the market value of our target assets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in prepayment rates on our target assets; |
|
|
|
|
effects of hedging instruments on our target assets; |
|
|
|
|
rates of default or decreased recovery rates on our target assets; |
|
|
|
|
modifications to whole loans or loans underlying securities; |
|
|
|
|
the degree to which our hedging strategies may or may not protect us from
interest rate volatility; |
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations, tax law and rates, and similar matters and
our ability to respond to such changes; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax
purposes; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act); |
|
|
|
|
availability of investment opportunities in mortgage-related, real
estate-related and other securities; |
|
|
|
|
availability of U.S. government Agency guarantees with regard to payments of
principal and interest on securities; |
|
|
|
|
estimates relating to our ability to continue to make distributions to our
shareholders; |
|
|
|
|
availability of qualified personnel; |
|
|
|
|
our understanding of our competition; |
|
|
|
|
changes to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (US GAAP); and |
|
|
|
|
market trends in our industry, interest rates, real estate values, the debt
securities markets or the general economy. |
These forward-looking statements are based upon information presently available to our
management and are inherently subjective, uncertain and subject to change. There can be no
assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. We caution
investors not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements and urge you to carefully consider
the risks identified under the captions Risk Factors, Forward-Looking Statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this
Report and the most recent Form 10-K, which is available on the
SECs website at www.sec.gov.
All written or oral forward-looking statements that we make, or that are attributable to us,
are expressly qualified by this cautionary notice. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update
the information in any public disclosure if any forward-looking statement later turns out to be
inaccurate, except as may otherwise be required by law.
Overview
We are a Maryland corporation primarily focused on investing in, financing and managing
residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans. Our common stock is
listed on the New York Stock
26
Exchange under the symbol IVR. We are externally managed and advised
by Invesco Advisers, Inc., our Manager, which is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Invesco
Ltd. We elected to qualify to be taxed as a REIT commencing with our taxable year ended December
31, 2009. Accordingly, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable
income that we distribute currently to our shareholders as long as we maintain our qualification as
a REIT. We operate our business in a manner that will permit us to maintain our exemption from
registration under the 1940 Act.
Our objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted returns to our shareholders, primarily
through dividends and secondarily through capital appreciation. To achieve this objective, we
primarily invest in the following:
|
|
|
Agency RMBS, which are residential mortgage-backed securities, for which a U.S.
government Agency such as the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie
Mae) or a federally chartered corporation such as the Federal National Mortgage
Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie
Mac) guarantees payments of principal and interest on the securities; |
|
|
|
|
Non-Agency RMBS, which are RMBS that are not issued or guaranteed by a U.S.
government agency or a federally chartered corporation; |
|
|
|
|
CMBS, which are commercial mortgage-backed securities; and |
|
|
|
|
Residential and commercial mortgage loans. |
We finance our investments in Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and CMBS through short-term
borrowings structured as repurchase agreements. We have also financed our investments in certain
non-Agency RMBS, CMBS and residential and commercial mortgage loans by contributing capital to one
or more of the legacy securities public-private investment funds (PPIFs) that receive financing
under the U.S. governments Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP), established and managed by
our Manager (the Invesco PPIP Fund), which, in turn, invests in our target assets.
Recent Developments
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued 1,237,716 shares of common stock at an
average price of $22.62 under the Companys Direct Stock Purchase Plan with total proceeds to us of
approximately $27.8 million, net of issuance costs.
On June 9, 2011, we declared a dividend of $0.97 per share of common stock. The dividend was
paid on July 28, 2011 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 17, 2011.
On June 23, 2011, we completed a follow-on public offering of 17,000,000 shares of common
stock and an issuance of an additional 2,550,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the
underwriters full exercise of their over-allotment option at $20.15 per share. Net proceeds to us
were approximately $388.8 million, net of issuance costs of approximately $5.1 million.
Factors Impacting Our Operating Results
Our operating results can be affected by a number of factors, many of which are beyond our
control, and primarily depend on, among other things, the level of our net interest income, the
market value of our assets and the supply of, and demand for, the target assets in which we invest.
Our net interest income, which includes the amortization of purchase premiums and accretion of
purchase discounts, varies primarily as a result of changes in market interest rates and prepayment
speeds, as measured by the constant prepayment rate (CPR) on our target
assets. Interest rates and prepayment speeds vary according to the type of investment,
conditions in the financial markets, competition and other factors, none of which can be predicted
with any certainty.
27
Market Conditions
Beginning in the summer of 2007, significant adverse changes in financial market conditions
resulted in a deleveraging of the entire global financial system. As part of this process,
residential and commercial mortgage markets in the United States experienced a variety of
difficulties, including loan defaults, credit losses and reduced liquidity. As a result, many
lenders tightened their lending standards, reduced lending capacity, liquidated significant
portfolios or exited the market altogether, and therefore, financing with attractive terms was
generally unavailable. In response to these unprecedented events, the U.S. government has taken a
number of actions to stabilize the financial markets and encourage lending. Significant measures
include the enactment of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to, among other things,
establish the Troubled Asset Relief Program, (TARP), the enactment of the Housing and Economic
Recovery Act (HERA), which established a new regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the
establishment of the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) and the PPIP. Some of
these programs are beginning to expire and the impact of the wind-down of these programs on the
financial sector and on the economic recovery is unknown. Although the financial markets showed
signs of stabilizing in 2010, it remains unclear when the economy will fully recover. Further
volatility and deterioration in the residential and commercial mortgage markets could adversely
impact the performance and market value of our target assets.
We have elected to participate in programs established by the U.S. government, including the
TALF and the PPIP, in order to increase our ability to acquire our target assets and to provide a
source of financing for such acquisitions. The TALF was intended to make credit available to
consumers and businesses on more favorable terms by facilitating the issuance of asset-backed
securities and improving the market conditions for asset-backed securities generally. The Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, (FRBNY) made up to $200 billion of loans under the TALF. The facility
ceased making loans collateralized by newly issued and legacy ABS on March 31, 2010. As a result,
we are no longer able to obtain additional TALF loans as a source of financing for investments in
legacy CMBS. In November 2010, the Company exercised its right to prepay the TALF loans secured by
CMBS. The purpose for the prepayment was to obtain lower borrowing costs from other sources. The
financings under the TALF were replaced with repurchase agreements.
The PPIP is designed to encourage the transfer of certain illiquid legacy real estate-related
assets off of the balance sheets of financial institutions, restarting the market for these assets
and supporting the flow of credit and other capital into the broader economy. As of March 31, 2010,
the Invesco PPIP Fund stopped accepting investment subscriptions and the fund was deemed closed.
The Dodd-Frank Act enacted on July 21, 2010, contains numerous provisions affecting the
financial and mortgage industries, many of which may have an impact on our operating environment
and the target assets in which we invest. Consequently, the Dodd-Frank Act may affect our cost of
doing business, may limit our investment opportunities and may affect the competitive balance
within our industry and market areas.
The recent U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit debate has increased the possibility of the
credit-rating agencies downgrading the U.S.s credit rating. Because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
are in conservatorship of the U.S. government, if the U.S.s credit rating were downgraded, it may
impact the credit risk associated with Agency RMBS and other assets, and, therefore, decrease the
value of the Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and CMBS in our portfolio, which could cause our
repurchase counterparties to make margin calls on our borrowings and swaps if our collateral is
insufficient to cover the debt secured by our assets and could reduce our book value. If the
value or our assets declines, we may have to sell assets at reduced prices to cover such margin
calls. In addition, a downgrade of the U.S. governments credit rating could potentially create
broader financial instability, which may weigh heavily on the global banking system and could limit
our ability to finance our investment portfolio A default could also reduce our ability to finance
these assets through repurchase agreements or result in increased advance rates, haircuts (the
percentage amount by which the collateral value must exceed the loan amount) and other funding
costs associated with such financing.
Although U.S. lawmakers have reached an agreement on a national debt ceiling and budget, the
terms of such agreement could negatively impact the trading market for U.S. government securities
and could result in limited economic growth. This may negatively affect the value of our
investment portfolio, which could cause our repurchase counterparties to make margin calls on our
borrowings and swaps if our collateral is insufficient to cover
28
the debt secured by our assets,
which could, in turn, require us to sell our assets at reduced prices to cover such margin calls.
Investment Activities
As of June 30, 2011, 41.2% of our equity was invested in Agency RMBS, 42.8% in non-Agency
RMBS, 13.4% in CMBS, and 2.6% in the Invesco PPIP Fund. We use leverage on our target assets to
achieve our return objectives. For our total investment portfolio, we focus on securities we
believe provide attractive returns when levered approximately 3 to 7 times. The leverage on classes
of assets may periodically exceed the stated ranges as we adjust our borrowings to obtain the best
available source and minimize total interest expense, while maintaining our overall portfolio
leverage guidelines.
As of June 30, 2011, we had approximately $5.0 billion in 30-year fixed rate securities that
offered higher coupons and call protection based on the collateral attributes. We balanced this
with approximately $2.1 billion in 15-year fixed rate securities, approximately $1.3 billion in
hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) and approximately $122.8 million in ARMs we believe to
have similar durations based on prepayment speeds. As of June 30, 2011, we had purchased
approximately $2.0 billion non-Agency RMBS fixed rate mortgages and $369.9 million non-Agency RMBS
ARMs.
Initially, we focused on CMBS that could be financed under the TALF. In November 2010, the
Company exercised its right to prepay the TALF loans secured by CMBS. The purpose for the
prepayment was to obtain lower borrowing costs. The Company obtained additional advances under
existing repurchase agreement financing arrangements. As of June 30, 2011, we owned approximately
$1.2 billion in CMBS and financed $875.2 million in repurchase agreements. In addition, as of June
30, 2011, we had purchased approximately $78.8 million in CMOs.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we purchased approximately $3.4 billion of
mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on these purchases as of June 30, 2011 is 4.21%.
Investment Portfolio
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of our investment portfolio as of June 30,
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gain/ |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
|
(Discount) |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Coupon (1) |
|
|
Yield (2) |
|
Agency RMBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 year fixed-rate |
|
|
1,996,178 |
|
|
|
106,361 |
|
|
|
2,102,539 |
|
|
|
15,732 |
|
|
|
2,118,271 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
3.24 |
% |
30 year fixed-rate |
|
|
4,672,172 |
|
|
|
320,753 |
|
|
|
4,992,925 |
|
|
|
45,550 |
|
|
|
5,038,475 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
% |
|
|
3.99 |
% |
ARM |
|
|
118,688 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
121,669 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
122,763 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
3.22 |
% |
Hybrid ARM |
|
|
1,233,212 |
|
|
|
27,161 |
|
|
|
1,260,373 |
|
|
|
11,102 |
|
|
|
1,271,475 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Agency |
|
|
8,020,250 |
|
|
|
457,256 |
|
|
|
8,477,506 |
|
|
|
73,478 |
|
|
|
8,550,984 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS-CMO |
|
|
353,790 |
|
|
|
(278,533 |
) |
|
|
75,257 |
|
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
78,787 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
6.23 |
% |
Non-Agency MBS |
|
|
2,757,121 |
|
|
|
(408,616 |
) |
|
|
2,348,505 |
|
|
|
(28,085 |
) |
|
|
2,320,420 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
CMBS |
|
|
1,229,100 |
|
|
|
(6,617 |
) |
|
|
1,222,483 |
|
|
|
(16,813 |
) |
|
|
1,205,670 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
5.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12,360,261 |
|
|
|
(236,510 |
) |
|
|
12,123,751 |
|
|
|
32,110 |
|
|
|
12,155,861 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
% |
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net weighted average coupon (WAC) is presented net of servicing and other fees.
|
(2) |
|
Average yield incorporates future prepayment and loss assumptions.
|
(3) |
|
The Non-agency MBS held by the Company is 84.1% fixed rate and 15.9% floating rate, based on fair value.
|
29
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of our investment portfolio, at
fair value, according to their estimated weighted average life classifications as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Less than one year |
|
|
9,806 |
|
Greater than one year and less than five years |
|
|
6,112,694 |
|
Greater than or equal to five years |
|
|
6,033,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12,155,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents certain information about the carrying value of our
available for sale MBS at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Principal balance |
|
|
12,360,261 |
|
Unamortized premium |
|
|
476,535 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(713,045 |
) |
Gross unrealized gains |
|
|
141,465 |
|
Gross unrealized losses |
|
|
(109,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
12,155,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financing and Other Liabilities. We enter into repurchase agreements to finance the
majority of our Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and CMBS. These agreements are secured by our Agency
RMBS, Non-Agency RMBS and CMBS and bear interest at rates that have historically moved in close
relationship to the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR). As of June 30, 2011, we had entered into
repurchase agreements totalling $9.6 billion. In addition, we committed to invest up to $100.0
million in the Invesco PPIP Fund, which, in turn, invests in our target assets. As of June 30,
2011, approximately $69.3 million of our commitment to the Invesco PPIP Fund has been called.
The Company records the liability for mortgage-backed securities purchased for which settlement
has not taken place as an investment related payable. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
Company had investment related payables of $0.9 million and $0.4 million respectively of which no items
were outstanding greater than thirty days. The change in balance was primarily due to an increase in
mortgage-backed security purchases at quarter end related to our
follow-on common stock issuance.
Hedging Instruments. We generally hedge as much of our interest rate risk as we deem prudent
in light of market conditions. No assurance can be given that our hedging activities will have the
desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Our investment
policies do not contain specific requirements as to the percentages or amount of interest rate risk
that we are required to hedge.
Interest rate hedging may fail to protect or could adversely affect us because, among other
things:
|
|
|
available interest rate hedging may not correspond directly with the interest
rate risk for which protection is sought; |
|
|
|
|
the duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related liability; |
|
|
|
|
the party owing money in the hedging transaction may default on its obligation
to pay; |
|
|
|
|
the credit quality of the party owing money on the hedge may be downgraded to
such an extent that it impairs our ability to sell or assign our side of the
hedging transaction; and |
|
|
|
|
the value of derivatives used for hedging may be adjusted from time to time in
accordance with accounting rules to reflect changes in fair value. Downward
adjustments or mark-to-market losses would reduce our shareholders equity. |
As of June 30, 2011, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements designed to mitigate
the effects of increases in interest rates under a portion of our repurchase agreements. These swap
agreements provide for fixed interest rates indexed off of one-month LIBOR and effectively fix the
floating interest rates on $6.9 billion of borrowings under our repurchase agreements as of June
30, 2011. We intend to continue to add interest rate hedge positions according to our hedging
strategy.
30
The following table summarizes our hedging activity as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fixed Pay |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Remaining Interest Rate Swap Term |
|
$ in thousands |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Years) |
|
1 year or less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 1 year and less than 3 years |
|
|
475,000 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
|
Greater than 3 years and less than 5 years |
|
|
5,100,000 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
|
Greater than 5 years |
|
|
1,350,000 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,925,000 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $500.0 million of the total $6.9 billion of the swap notional amount on
June 30, 2011 were forward-starting interest rate swaps with effective dates beyond June 30, 2011.
Additionally, we had approximately $881.5 million of unsettled securities which would have
increased our total outstanding borrowing balance if the purchases would have been settled with
repurchase agreements.
Credit Default Swap Agreement
We entered into a credit default swap (CDS) on December 31, 2010 with a $150.0 million
notional balance and a fair value of $0. Under this CDS, we sold protection (and receive premium
payments of 3.0% on the outstanding notional amount) on a specific pool of non-Agency RMBS that
exceed a specified loss limit of 25%. Our maximum exposure is the unpaid principal balance of the
underlying RMBS that exceeds the specified loss limit. The CDS is not designated as a hedging
instrument therefore the unrealized gain of $240,000 and $1.7 million is included in the gain on
credit default swap in the statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively.
At June 30, 2011, the open CDS sold by us is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousand |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Fair value amount |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
|
128,760 |
|
|
|
149,964 |
|
Maximum potential amount of future undiscounted payments |
|
|
96,570 |
|
|
|
112,500 |
|
Recourse provisions with third parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral held by counterparty |
|
|
19,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value per Share
Our book value per share was $19.34 and $20.49 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively, on a fully diluted basis, after giving effect to our units of limited partnership
interest in our operating partnership, which may be converted to common shares at the sole election
of the Company. The decline in our book value is primarily attributable to the decrease in value
of our interest rate swaps.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which
requires the use of estimates and assumptions that involve the exercise of judgment and use of
assumptions as to future uncertainties. Our most critical accounting policies involve decisions and
assessments that could affect our reported assets and liabilities, as well as our reported revenues
and expenses. We believe that all of the decisions and assessments upon which our consolidated
financial statements are based are reasonable at the time made and based upon information available
to us at that time. We rely upon independent pricing of our assets at each quarters end to arrive
at what we
believe to be reasonable estimates of fair market value. The complete listing of our Critical
Accounting Policies was disclosed in our 2010 annual report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on
March 14, 2011, and there have been no material changes to our Critical Accounting Policies as
disclosed therein.
31
Expected Impact of New Authoritative Guidance on Future Financial Information
In April 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-03, Reconsideration of
Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements (ASU 2011-03). ASU 2011-03 simplifies the accounting
for financial assets transferred under repurchase agreements (repos) and similar arrangements, by
eliminating the transferors ability criterion from the assessment of effective control over those
assets. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December
15, 2011. We do not believe that the adoption of the amended guidance will have a significant
effect on our consolidated financial statements now or in the future.
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS (ASU 2011-04).
ASU 2011-04 amends Topic 820 and does not modify the requirements for when fair value measurements
apply; rather, it clarifies the Boards intent about the application of existing fair value
measurement requirements, and changes to a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair
value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For public entities, this
guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early
application by public entities is not permitted. We do not anticipate any material impact from
this guidance now or in the future.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-05, Presentation of
Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 amends Topic 220 and eliminates the option to
present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in
stockholders equity, which is our current presentation, and also requires presentation of
reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the
financial statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after December 15, 2011, and is not expected to have a material effect on our financial condition
or results of operations now or in the future. However, it will change our financial statement
presentation once adopted.
Results of Operations
The table below presents certain information from our Consolidated Statement of Operations for
the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended |
|
|
Six Months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
$ in thousands, except per share data |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
108,981 |
|
|
|
29,207 |
|
|
|
177,517 |
|
|
|
47,217 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
34,207 |
|
|
|
6,379 |
|
|
|
49,785 |
|
|
|
10,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
74,774 |
|
|
|
22,828 |
|
|
|
127,732 |
|
|
|
37,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
6,540 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
12,125 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fee related party |
|
|
5,753 |
|
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
9,728 |
|
|
|
3,055 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
6,910 |
|
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
11,754 |
|
|
|
5,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
74,404 |
|
|
|
22,059 |
|
|
|
128,103 |
|
|
|
35,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
72,998 |
|
|
|
20,750 |
|
|
|
125,246 |
|
|
|
32,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
(basic/diluted) |
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
73,486 |
|
|
|
22,808 |
|
|
|
62,731 |
|
|
|
19,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
74,929 |
|
|
|
24,239 |
|
|
|
64,167 |
|
|
|
20,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Net Income Summary
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our net income was $74.4 million or $0.99 basic and
diluted income per weighted average share available to common shareholders compared to $22.1
million or $0.91 basic and diluted income per weighted average share available to common
shareholders for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our net income was $128.1 million or $2.00 basic and
diluted income per weighted average share available to common shareholders compared to $35.2
million or $1.70 basic and diluted income per weighted average share available to common
shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
The increase to net income for the three and six month periods is primarily attributable to
the growth in our investment portfolio resulting from our follow-on common stock offerings. Since
June 30, 2010, we completed four follow-on common stock offerings raising approximately $1.4
billion in equity.
Interest Income and Average Earning Asset Yield
Our primary source of income is interest earned on our investment portfolio. We had average
earning assets of $10.2 billion and $2.0 billion and earned interest income of $109.0 million and
$29.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The yield on our
average investment portfolio was 4.29% and 5.71% for the respective periods. The change in our
average assets and the portfolio yield was primarily the result of the change in our portfolio
composition as we have allocated a higher amount of equity to Agency RMBS at lower yields and
higher leverage.
We had average earning assets of $8.3 billion and $1.7 billion and earned interest income of
$177.5 million and $47.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
yield on our average investment portfolio was 4.28% and 5.54% for the respective periods. The
change in our average assets and the portfolio yield was primarily the result of the change in our
portfolio composition as we have allocated a higher amount of equity to Agency RMBS at lower yields
and higher leverage.
The CPR of our portfolio impacts the amount of premium and discount on the purchase of
securities that is recognized into income. Our Agency and non-Agency RMBS had a weighted average
CPR of 8.1 and 12.8 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively. The
table below shows the three month CPR for our RMBS compared to bonds with similar characteristics
(Cohorts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Cohort |
|
|
Company |
|
|
Cohort |
|
15 year Agency RMBS |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
30 year Agency RMBS |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
Agency Hybrid ARM RMBS |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Non-Agency RMBS |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Interest Expense and the Cost of Funds
Our largest expense is the interest expense on borrowed funds. We had average borrowed funds
of $8.9 billion and $1.6 billion and total interest expense of $34.2 million and $6.4 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in average borrowed funds
and interest expense was primarily the result of increasing the size of our investment portfolio.
We had average borrowed funds of $7.2 billion and $1.3 billion and total interest expense of
$49.8 million and $10.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
increase in average borrowed funds and interest expense was primarily the result of increasing the
size of our investment portfolio.
Our average cost of funds was 1.54% and 1.58% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively. Since a substantial portion of our repurchase agreements are short term,
changes in market rates are directly reflected in our interest expense. Interest expense includes
borrowing costs, as well as any hedging costs.
Our average cost of funds was 1.39% and 1.54% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Since a substantial portion of our repurchase agreements are short term, changes in
market rates are directly reflected in our interest expense. Interest expense includes borrowing
costs, as well as any hedging costs.
Net Interest Income
Our net interest income, which equals interest income less interest expense, totaled $74.8
million and $22.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our net
interest rate margin, which equals the yield on our average assets for the period less the average
cost of funds for the period, was 2.75% and 4.13% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively. The increase in net interest income was primarily the result of increasing our
investment portfolio while the decrease in our net interest margin was a direct result of our
change in asset mix and the impact of additional cost of funds related to our interest rate hedges.
Our net interest income totaled $127.7 million and $37.2 million for the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our net interest rate margin was 2.89% and 4.00% for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in net interest income was
primarily the result of increasing our investment portfolio while the decrease in our net interest
margin was a direct result of our change in asset mix between Agency RMBS, non-Agency RMBS and
CMBS.
Other Income
As part of our credit process, all of our MBS are reviewed on a monthly basis to determine if
they continue to meet our risk and return targets. This process involves looking at changing market
assumptions and the impact those assumptions will have on the individual securities. As a result of
our change in market assumptions, we sold securities and recognized net gain of approximately $3.6
million and $642,000 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
As a result of our change in market assumptions, we sold securities and recognized net gain of
approximately $4.8 million and $1.4 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recognized equity in earnings of
approximately $3.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and unrealized loss on the change in
fair value of our investment in the Invesco PPIP Fund of approximately $1.6 million and unrealized
income on the change in fair value of our
investment in the Invesco PPIP Fund of approximately $44,000, respectively. The net increase
in equity in earnings and unrealized loss on the change in fair value was primarily the result of
an increase in the fair value of the PPIP Fund.
34
For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recognized equity in earnings of
approximately $5.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, and unrealized loss on the change in
fair value of our investment in the Invesco PPIP Fund of approximately $1.9 million and unrealized
income on the change in fair value of our investment in the Invesco PPIP Fund of approximately
$260,000, respectively. The net earnings from the unconsolidated limited partnership were primarily
the result of a gain realized offset by a decrease in the fair value of the PPIP Fund.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 we recognized income of $1.3 million on our
investment in a CDS of which $240,000 is an unrealized gain based on change in the fair market
value of the CDS and $1.0 million represents premium payments we receive for providing protection.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011 we recognized income of $3.8 million on our investment
in a CDS of which $1.7 million is an unrealized gain based on change in the fair market value of
the CDS and $2.1 million represents premium payments we receive for providing protection.
Expenses
We incurred management fees of $5.8 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended June
30, 2011, and 2010, respectively, which are payable to our Manager under our management agreement.
The increase in management fees is attributable to an increase in shareholders equity resulting
from our follow-on common stock offerings in 2010 and 2011. This management fee and the
relationship between the Company and the Manager are discussed further in our discussion of related
party relationships.
We incurred management fees of $9.7 million and $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011, and 2010, respectively, which are payable to our Manager under our management agreement. The
increase in management fees is attributable to an increase in shareholders equity resulting from
our follow-on common stock offerings in 2010 and 2011. This management fee and the relationship
between the Company and the Manager are discussed further in our discussion of related party
relationships.
Our general and administrative expenses were approximately $1.2 million and $1.0 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The majority of the increase is
related to an increase in professional fees and other miscellaneous general and administrative
costs offset by lower insurance premium cost for our liability insurance to indemnify our directors
and officers.
Our general and administrative expenses were approximately $2.0 million and $2.0 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Net Income and Return on Average Equity
Our net income was $74.4 million and $22.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. Our annualized return on average equity was 18.99% and 17.71% for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in net income and return on average
equity was primarily the result of an increase in our net interest income following our portfolio
growth.
Our net income was $128.1 million and $35.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively. Our annualized return on average equity was 18.80% and 16.08% for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in net income and return on average
equity was primarily the result of an increase in our net interest income following our portfolio
growth.
35
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including
ongoing commitments to pay dividends, fund investments, repayment of borrowings and other general
business needs. Our primary sources of funds for liquidity consist of the net proceeds from our
common equity offerings, net cash provided by operating activities, cash from repurchase agreements
and other financing arrangements and future issuances of equity and/or debt securities.
We currently believe that we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources available for the
acquisition of additional investments, repayments on borrowings and the payment of cash dividends
as required for continued qualification as a REIT. We generally maintain liquidity to pay down
borrowings under repurchase arrangements to reduce borrowing costs and otherwise efficiently manage
our long-term investment capital. Because the level of these borrowings can be adjusted on a daily
basis, the level of cash and cash equivalents carried on our balance sheet is significantly less
important than our potential liquidity available under borrowing arrangements.
We held cash and cash equivalents of approximately $66,000 and $16.2 million at June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. Our cash and cash equivalents decreased due to normal fluctuations in cash
balances related to the timing of principal and interest payments, repayments of debt, and asset
purchases and sales.
Our operating activities provided net cash of approximately $115.8 million and $23.0 million
for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The cash provided by
operating activities increased due to the increase in net interest income earned by the portfolio
which resulted from the increase in average interest earning assets of $8.3 billion in investments
at June 30, 2011 as compared to $1.7 billion at June 30, 2010.
Our investing activities used net cash of $6.2 billion and $1.5 billion for the six month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the six month period ended June 30, 2011
we utilized cash to purchase $7.0 billion in securities which were offset by proceeds from asset
sales of $344.8 million and principal payments of $491.6 million. During the six month period ended
June 30, 2010 we utilized cash to purchase $1.8 billion in securities and sold $169.0 million and
received principal payments of $160.8 million. The increase in principal payments resulted from the
larger portfolio at June 30, 2011 as compared to 2010.
Our financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 consisted of net proceeds from
our March and June 2011 follow-on public offerings in which we raised approximately $886.9 million
and from our repurchase agreements.
Our financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 consisted of net proceeds from
our January and May 2010 follow-on public offerings in which we raised approximately $342.1 million
and from our repurchase agreements.
We allocate our equity to each of our target assets and apply leverage to obtain our net
interest income. We invest in assets that provide attractive returns with an aggregate
debt-to-equity ratio of 3 to 7 times. On June 23, 2011, we raised additional net proceeds of
approximately $389 million from a follow-on public offering. We immediately identified and
purchased our target assets following the offering. Approximately $881.5 million of our target
assets did not settle prior to June 30, 2011 and therefore were not fully levered at June 30, 2011.
The table below shows the allocation of our equity and debt-to-equity ratio as of June 30, 2011.
The leverage on each class of
assets may periodically exceed the stated ranges as we adjust our borrowings to obtain the
best available source and minimize total interest expense while maintaining our overall portfolio
leverage guidelines.
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
Agency |
|
|
Non-Agency |
|
|
CMBS |
|
|
PPIF |
|
|
Total |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
7,174,858 |
|
|
|
1,510,666 |
|
|
|
875,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,560,766 |
|
Equity allocation |
|
|
751,880 |
|
|
|
780,487 |
|
|
|
244,823 |
|
|
|
48,177 |
|
|
|
1,825,367 |
|
Debt / Equity Ratio |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
% of Total Equity |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
|
|
42.8 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
As of June 30, 2011, our total leverage ratio was 5.2x. The leverage ratio was impacted
by the purchase of approximately $881.5 million of securities at the end of June that settled in
July. If the liabilities from these security purchases would have settled with repurchase
agreements prior to the end of the quarter the total leverage ratio would have been approximately
5.7x.
We enter into repurchase agreements with various counterparties to fund our purchases of MBS.
The following table summarizes our total borrowings by type of investment as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
$ in thousands |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Rate |
|
Agency RMBS |
|
|
7,174,858 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
3,483,440 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
Non-Agency RBS |
|
|
1,510,666 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
459,979 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
% |
CMBS |
|
|
875,242 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
401,240 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
9,560,766 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
% |
|
|
4,344,659 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, the weighted average margin requirement, or the percentage amount by
which the collateral value must exceed the loan amount, which we also refer to as the haircut,
under our repurchase agreements for Agency RMBS was approximately 4.60% (weighted by borrowing
amount), under our repurchase agreements for non-Agency RMBS was approximately 20.58% and under our
repurchase agreements for CMBS was approximately 17.96%. Across our repurchase facilities for
Agency RMBS, the haircuts range from a low of 3% to a high of 6%, for non-Agency RMBS range from a
low of 10% to a high of 40% and for CMBS range from a low of 15% to a high of 30%. Our hedged cost
of funds was approximately 2.47% and 0.89% as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Declines in the value of our securities portfolio can trigger margin calls by our lenders under our
repurchase agreements. An event of default or termination event would give some of our
counterparties the option to terminate all repurchase transactions existing with us and require any
amount due by us to the counterparties to be payable immediately.
As discussed above under Market Conditions, the residential mortgage market in the United
States has experienced difficult economic conditions including:
|
|
|
increased volatility of many financial assets, including agency securities and other
high-quality RMBS assets, due to potential security liquidations; |
|
|
|
|
increased volatility and deterioration in the broader residential mortgage and RMBS
markets; and |
|
|
|
|
significant disruption in financing of RMBS. |
If these conditions persist, then our lenders may be forced to exit the repurchase market,
become insolvent or further tighten lending standards or increase the amount of required equity
capital or haircut, any of which could make it more difficult or costly for us to obtain financing.
In addition, because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are in conservatorship of the U.S. government, if
the U.S.s credit rating is downgraded, it may impact the credit risk
associated with Agency RMBS and other assets, and, therefore, decrease the value of the Agency
RMBS, non-Agency RBMS and CMBS in our portfolio, which could cause our repurchase counterparties to
make margin calls on our borrowings and swaps, if our collateral is insufficient to cover the debt
secured by our assets.
37
Effective as of August 27, 2010, we implemented a dividend reinvestment and stock purchase
plan (the DRIP), pursuant to which we registered and reserved for issuance 2,000,000 shares of
our common stock. Under the terms of the DRIP, shareholders who participate in the DRIP may
purchase shares of our common stock directly from us, in cash investments up to $10,000. At our
sole discretion, we may accept optional cash investments in excess of $10,000 per month, which may
qualify for a discount from the market price of 0% to 3%. The DRIP participants may also
automatically reinvest all or a portion of their dividends for additional shares of our stock. We
expect to use the proceeds from any dividend reinvestments or stock purchases for general corporate
purposes. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we issued a total of 1,275 common shares
pursuant to the plan.
Effects of Margin Requirements, Leverage and Credit Spreads
Our securities have values that fluctuate according to market conditions and, as discussed
above, the market value of our securities will decrease as prevailing interest rates or credit
spreads increase. When the value of the securities pledged to secure a repurchase loan decreases to
the point where the positive difference between the collateral value and the loan amount is less
than the haircut, our lenders may issue a margin call, which means that the lender will require
us to pay the margin call in cash or pledge additional collateral to meet that margin call. Under
our repurchase facilities, our lenders have full discretion to determine the value of the
securities we pledge to them. Most of our lenders will value securities based on recent trades in
the market. Lenders also issue margin calls as the published current principal balance factors
change on the pool of mortgages underlying the securities pledged as collateral when scheduled and
unscheduled paydowns are announced monthly.
We experience margin calls in the ordinary course of our business. In seeking to effectively
manage the margin requirements established by our lenders, we maintain a position of cash and
unpledged securities. We refer to this position as our liquidity. The level of liquidity we have
available to meet margin calls is directly affected by our leverage levels, our haircuts and the
price changes on our securities. If interest rates increase as a result of a yield curve shift or
for another reason or if credit spreads widen, then the prices of our collateral (and our unpledged
assets that constitute our liquidity) will decline, we will experience margin calls, and we will
use our liquidity to meet the margin calls. There can be no assurance that we will maintain
sufficient levels of liquidity to meet any margin calls. If our haircuts increase, our liquidity
will proportionately decrease. In addition, if we increase our borrowings, our liquidity will
decrease by the amount of additional haircut on the increased level of indebtedness.
We intend to maintain a level of liquidity in relation to our assets that enables us to meet
reasonably anticipated margin calls but that also allows us to be substantially invested in
securities. We may misjudge the appropriate amount of our liquidity by maintaining excessive
liquidity, which would lower our investment returns, or by maintaining insufficient liquidity,
which would force us to liquidate assets into unfavorable market conditions and harm our results of
operations and financial condition.
Forward-Looking Statements Regarding Liquidity
Based upon our current portfolio, leverage rate and available borrowing arrangements, we
believe that the net proceeds of our common equity offerings, combined with cash flow from
operations and available borrowing capacity, will be sufficient to enable us to meet anticipated
short-term (one year or less) liquidity requirements to fund our investment activities, pay fees
under our management agreement, fund our distributions to shareholders and for other general
corporate expenses.
Our ability to meet our long-term (greater than one year) liquidity and capital resource
requirements will be subject to obtaining additional debt financing and equity capital. We may
increase our capital resources by obtaining long-term credit facilities or through public or
private offerings of equity or debt securities, possibly including classes of preferred stock,
common stock, and senior or subordinated notes. Such financing will depend on market conditions for
capital raises and our ability to invest such offering proceeds. If we are unable to renew, replace
or
expand our sources of financing on substantially similar terms, it may have an adverse effect
on our business and results of operations.
38
Contractual Obligations
On July 1, 2009, we entered into an agreement with our Manager pursuant to which our Manager
is entitled to receive a management fee and the reimbursement of certain expenses, which was
amended on May 24, 2011. The management fee will be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears in
an amount equal to 1.50% of our shareholders equity, per annum, calculated and payable quarterly
in arrears. Our Manager uses the proceeds from its management fee in part to pay compensation to
its officers and personnel who, notwithstanding that certain of those individuals are also our
officers, receive no cash compensation directly from us. We are required to reimburse our Manager
for operating expenses related to us incurred by our Manager, including certain salary expenses and
other expenses relating to legal, accounting, due diligence and other services. Expense
reimbursements to our Manager are made in cash on a monthly basis following the end of each month.
Our reimbursement obligation is not subject to any dollar limitation. Refer to Note 8 Related
Party Transactions for details of our reimbursements to our Manager.
Contractual Commitments
As of June 30, 2011, we had the following contractual commitments and commercial obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands |
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
After 5 years |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
9,560,766 |
|
|
|
9,560,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invesco PPIP Fund investment |
|
|
30,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
|
9,591,493 |
|
|
|
9,560,766 |
|
|
|
30,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, we have approximately $6.2 million in contractual interest payments
related to our repurchase agreements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We committed to invest up to $100.0 million in the Invesco PPIP Fund, which, in turn, invests
in our target assets. As of June 30, 2011 and 2010, approximately $69.3 million and $40.0 million
of the commitment have been called, respectively.
We also utilize credit derivatives, such as credit default swaps, to provide credit event
protection based on a financial index or specific security in exchange for receiving a fixed-rate
fee or premium over the term of the contract. These instruments enable us to synthetically assume
the credit risk of a reference security, portfolio of securities or index of securities. The
counterparty pays a premium to us and we agree to make a payment to compensate the counterparty for
losses upon the occurrence of a specified credit event.
Although contract-specific, credit events generally include bankruptcy, failure to pay,
restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium. Upon the
occurrence of a defined credit event, the difference between the value of the reference obligation
and the CDSs notional amount is recorded as realized loss in the statement of operations.
Our only CDS contract was entered into on December 31, 2010 with a $150.0 million notional
balance where we sold protection on a specific pool of non-Agency RMBS that exceed a specified loss
limit of 25% for a stated fixed rate fee of 3%. Our maximum exposure is the unpaid principal
balance of the underlying RMBS that exceeds the specified loss limit. We posted cash collateral to
secure potential loss payments of $19.8 million as of June 30, 2011. The notional amount of the
CDS at June 30, 2011 is $128.8 million, and we estimate the fair market value of the CDS is
approximately $1.7 million at June 30, 2011.
39
Shareholders Equity
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued 1,237,716 shares of common stock at an
average price of $22.62 under the DSPP with total proceeds of approximately $27.8 million, net of
issuance costs.
On June 23, 2011, we completed a follow-on public offering of 17,000,000 shares of common
stock and an issuance of an additional 2,550,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the
underwriters full exercise of their over-allotment option at $20.15 per share. Net proceeds to us
were approximately $388.8 million, net of issuance costs of approximately $5.1 million.
Unrealized Gains and Losses
Since we account for our investment securities as available-for-sale, unrealized
fluctuations in market values of assets do not impact our U.S. GAAP income but rather are reflected
on our balance sheet by changing the carrying value of the asset and shareholders equity under
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). In addition, unrealized fluctuations in market
values of our cash flow hedges that qualify for hedge accounting are also reflected in Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, net
unrealized loss included in shareholders equity was $156.1 million and $6.5 million, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, net unrealized gain included in shareholders
equity was $116.0 million and $6.3 million, respectively.
As a result of this mark-to-market accounting treatment, our book value and book value per
share are likely to fluctuate far more than if we used historical amortized cost accounting. As a
result, comparisons with companies that use historical cost accounting for some or all of their
balance sheet may not be meaningful.
Share-Based Compensation
We established the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan for grants of restricted common stock and other
equity based awards to our independent, non-executive directors, and to the officers and employees
of the Manager (the Incentive Plan). Under the Incentive Plan, a total of 1,000,000 shares are
currently reserved for issuance. Unless terminated earlier, the Incentive Plan will terminate in
2019, but will continue to govern the unexpired awards. Our three independent, non-executive
directors are each eligible to receive $45,000 in restricted common stock annually. For the three
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recognized compensation expense of approximately $34,000
and $34,000 and issued 1,467 and 921 shares, respectively, of restricted stock to our independent,
non-executive directors pursuant to the Incentive Plan. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, we recognized compensation expense of approximately $68,000 and $53,000 and issued 2,895 and
1,755 shares, respectively, of restricted stock to our independent, non-executive directors
pursuant to the Incentive Plan. The number of shares issued was determined based on the closing
price of our common stock on the NYSE on the actual date of grant.
40
Dividends
We intend to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to holders of our common stock.
U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its
REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding
net capital gains, and that it pay tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually
distributes less than 100% of its taxable income. We intend to pay regular quarterly dividends to
our shareholders in an amount equal at least 90% of our net taxable income. Before we pay any
dividend, whether for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise, we must first meet both our
operating requirements and debt service on our repurchase agreements and other debt payable. If our
cash available for distribution is less than our net taxable income, we could be required to sell
assets or borrow funds to make cash distributions, or we may make a portion of the required
distribution in the form of a taxable stock distribution or distribution of debt securities.
On June 9, 2011, we declared a dividend of $0.97 per share of common stock. The dividend was
paid on July 28, 2011 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 17, 2011.
Inflation
Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive in nature. As a
result, interest rates and other factors influence our performance far more than inflation. Changes
in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates.
Other Matters
We calculate that at least 75% of our assets were qualified REIT assets, as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) for the period ended June 30, 2011. We also
calculate that our revenue qualifies for the 75% source of income test and for the 95% source of
income test rules for the period ended June 30, 2011. Consequently, we met the REIT income and
asset test as of June 30, 2011. We also met all REIT requirements regarding the ownership of our
common stock and the distribution of our net income as of June 30, 2011. Therefore, as of June 30,
2011, we believe that we qualified as a REIT under the Code.
At all times, we intend to conduct our business so that neither we nor our operating
partnership nor the subsidiaries of our operating partnership are required to register as an
investment company under the 1940 Act. If we were required to register as an investment company,
then our use of leverage would be substantially reduced. Because we are a holding company that
conducts our business through our operating partnership and the operating partnerships
wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries, the securities issued by these subsidiaries that are
excepted from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of
the 1940 Act, together with any other investment securities the operating partnership may own, may
not have a combined value in excess of 40% of the value of the operating partnerships total assets
(exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, which we refer
to as the 40% test. This requirement limits the types of businesses in which we may engage through
our subsidiaries. In addition, we believe neither the company nor the operating partnership are
considered an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act because they do not
engage primarily or hold themselves out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing,
reinvesting or trading in securities. Rather, through the operating partnerships wholly-owned or
majority-owned subsidiaries, the company and the operating partnership are primarily engaged in the
non-investment company businesses of these subsidiaries. IAS Asset I LLC and certain of the
operating partnerships other subsidiaries that we may form in the future rely upon the exclusion
from the definition of investment company under the 1940 Act provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of
the 1940 Act, which is available for entities primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or
otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate. This exclusion
generally requires that at least 55% of each subsidiarys portfolio be comprised of qualifying
assets and at least 80% be comprised of qualifying assets and real estate-related assets (and no
more than 20% comprised of miscellaneous assets). Qualifying assets for this purpose include
mortgage loans fully secured by real estate and other assets, such as whole pool Agency and
non-Agency RMBS, that the SEC or its staff in various no-action letters has determined are the
functional equivalent of mortgage loans fully secured by real estate. We treat as real
estate-related assets CMBS, debt and equity securities of companies primarily engaged in real
estate businesses, Agency partial pool certificates and securities issued by pass-through entities
of which substantially all of the assets consist of qualifying assets
41
and/or real estate-related
assets. Additionally, unless certain mortgage securities represent all the certificates issued with
respect to an underlying pool of mortgages, the MBS may be treated as securities separate from the
underlying mortgage loans and, thus, may not be considered qualifying interests for purposes of the
55% requirement. We calculate that as of June 30, 2011, we conducted our business so as not to be
regulated as an investment company under the 1940 Act.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The primary components of our market risk are related to interest rate, prepayment and market
value. While we do not seek to avoid risk completely, we believe the risk can be quantified from
historical experience and we seek to actively manage that risk, to earn sufficient compensation to
justify taking those risks and to maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we undertake.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental, monetary and
tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations, and other factors
beyond our control. We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our investments and our
repurchase agreements. Our repurchase agreements are typically of limited duration and will be
periodically refinanced at current market rates. We mitigate this risk through utilization of
derivative contracts, primarily interest rate swap agreements, interest rate caps and interest rate
floors.
Interest Rate Effect on Net Interest Income
Our operating results depend in large part upon differences between the yields earned on our
investments and our cost of borrowing and interest rate hedging activities. Most of our repurchase
agreements provide financing based on a floating rate of interest calculated on a fixed spread over
LIBOR. The fixed spread will vary depending on the type of underlying asset which collateralizes
the financing. Accordingly, the portion of our portfolio which consists of floating interest rate
assets are match-funded utilizing our expected sources of short-term financing, while our fixed
interest rate assets are not match-funded. During periods of rising interest rates, the borrowing
costs associated with our investments tend to increase while the income earned on our fixed
interest rate investments may remain substantially unchanged. This increase in borrowing costs
results in the narrowing of the net interest spread between the related assets and borrowings and
may even result in losses. Further, during this portion of the interest rate and credit cycles,
defaults could increase and result in credit losses to us, which could adversely affect our
liquidity and operating results. Such delinquencies or defaults could also have an adverse effect
on the spread between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Hedging techniques are partly based on assumed levels of prepayments of our RMBS. If
prepayments are slower or faster than assumed, the life of the RMBS will be longer or shorter,
which would reduce the effectiveness of any hedging strategies we may use and may cause losses on
such transactions. Hedging strategies involving the use of derivative securities are highly complex
and may produce volatile returns.
Interest Rate Effects on Fair Value
Another component of interest rate risk is the effect that changes in interest rates will have
on the market value of the assets that we acquire. We face the risk that the market value of our
assets will increase or decrease at different rates than those of our liabilities, including our
hedging instruments.
We primarily assess our interest rate risk by estimating the duration of our assets and the
duration of our liabilities. Duration measures the market price volatility of financial instruments
as interest rates change. We generally calculate duration using various financial models and
empirical data. Different models and methodologies can produce different duration numbers for the
same securities.
The impact of changing interest rates on fair value can change significantly when interest
rates change materially. Therefore, the volatility in the fair value of our assets could increase
significantly in the event interest rates change materially. In addition, other factors impact the
fair value of our interest rate-sensitive investments and
42
hedging instruments, such as the shape of
the yield curve, market expectations as to future interest rate changes and other market
conditions. Accordingly, changes in actual interest rates may have a material adverse effect on us.
Prepayment Risk
As we receive prepayments of principal on our investments, premiums paid on these investments
are amortized against interest income. In general, an increase in prepayment rates will accelerate
the amortization of purchase premiums, thereby reducing the interest income earned on the
investments. Conversely, discounts on such investments are accreted into interest income. In
general, an increase in prepayment rates will accelerate the accretion of purchase discounts,
thereby increasing the interest income earned on the investments.
Extension Risk
We compute the projected weighted-average life of our investments based upon assumptions
regarding the rate at which the borrowers will prepay the underlying mortgages. In general, when a
fixed-rate or hybrid adjustable-rate security is acquired with borrowings, we may, but are not
required to, enter into an interest rate swap agreement or other hedging instrument that
effectively fixes our borrowing costs for a period close to the anticipated average life of the
fixed-rate portion of the related assets. This strategy is designed to protect us from rising
interest rates, because the borrowing costs are fixed for the duration of the fixed-rate portion of
the related target asset.
However, if prepayment rates decrease in a rising interest rate environment, then the life of
the fixed-rate portion of the related assets could extend beyond the term of the swap agreement or
other hedging instrument. This could have a negative impact on our results from operations, as
borrowing costs would no longer be fixed after the end of the hedging instrument, while the income
earned on the hybrid adjustable-rate assets would remain fixed. This situation may also cause the
market value of our hybrid adjustable-rate assets to decline, with little or no offsetting gain
from the related hedging transactions. In extreme situations, we may be forced to sell assets to
maintain adequate liquidity, which could cause us to incur losses.
Market Risk
Market Value Risk
Our available-for-sale securities are reflected at their estimated fair value with unrealized
gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income pursuant to ASC
Topic 320. The estimated fair value of these securities fluctuates primarily due to changes in
interest rates and other factors. Generally, in a rising interest rate environment, the estimated
fair value of these securities would be expected to decrease; conversely, in a decreasing interest
rate environment, the estimated fair value of these securities would be expected to increase.
The sensitivity analysis table presented below shows the estimated impact of an instantaneous
parallel shift in the yield curve, up and down 50 and 100 basis points, on the market value of our
interest rate-sensitive investments and net interest income, at June 30, 2011, assuming a static
portfolio. When evaluating the impact of changes in interest rates, prepayment assumptions and
principal reinvestment rates are adjusted based on our Managers expectations. The analysis
presented utilized assumptions, models and estimates of our Manager based on our Managers judgment
and experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Change in Projected |
|
Percentage Change in Projected |
Change in Interest Rates |
|
Net Interest Income |
|
Portfolio Value |
+1.00%
|
|
23.42%
|
|
(1.34)% |
+0.50%
|
|
19.53%
|
|
(0.58)% |
-0.50%
|
|
(19.58)%
|
|
0.18% |
-1.00%
|
|
(38.03)%
|
|
(0.03)% |
43
Real Estate Risk
Residential and commercial property values are subject to volatility and may be affected
adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to: national, regional and local
economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors);
local real estate conditions (such as the supply of housing stock); changes or continued weakness
in specific industry segments; construction quality, age and design; demographic factors; and
retroactive changes to building or similar codes. In addition, decreases in property values reduce
the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay our loans,
which could also cause us to suffer losses.
Credit Risk
We believe that our investment strategy will generally keep our credit losses and financing
costs low. However, we retain the risk of potential credit losses on all of the residential and
commercial mortgage loans, as well as the loans underlying the non-Agency RMBS and CMBS in our
portfolio. We seek to manage this risk through our pre-acquisition due diligence process and
through the use of non-recourse financing, which limits our exposure to credit losses to the
specific pool of mortgages that are subject to the non-recourse financing. In addition, with
respect to any particular asset, our Managers investment team evaluates, among other things,
relative valuation, supply and demand trends, shape of yield curves, prepayment rates, delinquency
and default rates, recovery of various sectors and vintage of collateral.
Risk Management
To the extent consistent with maintaining our REIT qualification, we seek to manage risk
exposure to protect our investment portfolio against the effects of major interest rate changes. We
generally seek to manage this risk by:
|
|
|
monitoring and adjusting, if necessary, the reset index and interest rate related to
our target assets and our financings; |
|
|
|
attempting to structure our financing agreements to have a range of different
maturities, terms, amortizations and interest rate adjustment periods; |
|
|
|
using hedging instruments, primarily interest rate swap agreements but also financial
futures, options, interest rate cap agreements, floors and forward sales to adjust the
interest rate sensitivity of our target assets and our borrowings; and |
|
|
|
actively managing, on an aggregate basis, the interest rate indices, interest rate
adjustment periods, and gross reset margins of our target assets and the interest rate
indices and adjustment periods of our financings. |
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures that are designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports
that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to
ensure that the required information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
We have evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and
procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the
controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only
provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation,
44
our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and
forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the six months ended June 30, 2011 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
45
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
From time to time, we may be involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2011, we were not involved in any such legal
proceedings.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Other than the risk factor set forth below, there were no material changes during the period
covered by this report to the risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2011. Additional risks not
presently known, or that we currently deem immaterial, also may have a material adverse affect on
our business, financial condition and results of operation.
Standard & Poors recent downgrade in the credit rating of the U.S. government and the
possibility of a further downgrade or additional downgrades by other credit rating agencies may
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, as
well as the price of our common stock.
Standard & Poors (S&P) recent downgrade in the credit rating of the U.S. government and the
possibility of a further downgrade by S&P or additional downgrades by other credit rating agencies
may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations,
as well as the price of our common stock. The impact on the company of the downgrade and resulting
financial market volatility may include, but not be limited to, the following:
|
|
|
The value of our assets may decline; |
|
|
|
|
Since we utilize repurchase agreements which are secured by our assets, a
decline in value of our assets may require us to post additional collateral to
secure our debt; |
|
|
|
|
Significant changes in interest rates may occur which may increase our borrowing
costs, reduce advance rates on repurchase agreements and reduce our liquidity; and |
|
|
|
|
Such interest rate volatility may cause further decline in the value of our
interest rate swaps causing us to post additional collateral. |
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.
ITEM 4. RESERVED
46
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC.
|
|
August 9, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Richard J. King
|
|
|
|
Richard J. King |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
August 9, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Donald R. Ramon
|
|
|
|
Donald R. Ramon |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
48
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Invesco
Mortgage Capital Inc., incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August
12, 2009. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Invesco Mortgage Capital
Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
Amendment No. 8 to our Registration Statement on Form
S-11, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 18, 2009. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amendment to Management Agreement by and among Invesco
Mortgage Capital Inc., IAS Operating Partnership LP, IAS
Asset I LLC and Invesco Advisors, Inc., dated as of May
24, 2011. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Richard J. King pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Donald R. Ramon pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Richard J. King pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Donald R. Ramon pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
101
|
|
The following series of unaudited XBRL-formatted
documents are collectively included herewith as
Exhibit 101. The financial information is extracted from
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.s unaudited consolidated
interim financial statements and notes that are included
in this Form 10-Q Report. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document |
49