Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-33472
TECHTARGET, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
04-3483216
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
275 Grove Street
Newton, Massachusetts 02466
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
(617) 431-9200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and formal fiscal year, if changed since last report): Not applicable
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The registrant had 38,549,094 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding
as of October
31, 2011.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
TECHTARGET, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
25,301 |
|
|
$ |
32,584 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
21,148 |
|
|
|
17,550 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,185 and
$1,026 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
27,100 |
|
|
|
24,678 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
76,794 |
|
|
|
76,562 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
7,836 |
|
|
|
6,235 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
9,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
92,528 |
|
|
|
92,382 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
9,336 |
|
|
|
10,469 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
7,907 |
|
|
|
7,985 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
204,452 |
|
|
$ |
193,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,662 |
|
|
$ |
3,797 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
Accrued compensation expenses |
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
1,979 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
6,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
16,428 |
|
|
|
14,786 |
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
5,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
20,899 |
|
|
|
19,898 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized,
43,660,157 shares issued and 37,802,279 shares outstanding at September 30,
2011 and 42,901,926 shares issued and 37,044,048 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(35,343 |
) |
|
|
(35,343 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
253,137 |
|
|
|
246,080 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(34,221 |
) |
|
|
(36,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
183,553 |
|
|
|
173,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
204,452 |
|
|
$ |
193,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
TECHTARGET, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online |
|
$ |
21,763 |
|
|
$ |
18,878 |
|
|
$ |
66,294 |
|
|
$ |
58,065 |
|
Events |
|
|
4,129 |
|
|
|
3,123 |
|
|
|
10,266 |
|
|
|
10,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
25,892 |
|
|
|
22,001 |
|
|
|
76,560 |
|
|
|
68,117 |
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online(1) |
|
|
5,547 |
|
|
|
4,921 |
|
|
|
16,873 |
|
|
|
15,043 |
|
Events(1) |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
3,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
7,035 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
20,480 |
|
|
|
18,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
18,857 |
|
|
|
15,931 |
|
|
|
56,080 |
|
|
|
49,615 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing(1) |
|
|
10,182 |
|
|
|
8,984 |
|
|
|
28,997 |
|
|
|
27,815 |
|
Product development(1) |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
5,690 |
|
|
|
6,623 |
|
General and administrative(1) |
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
10,362 |
|
|
|
11,671 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
16,808 |
|
|
|
16,356 |
|
|
|
50,464 |
|
|
|
51,269 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
5,616 |
|
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
Interest income, net |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
5,648 |
|
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
2,706 |
|
|
$ |
(2,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
38,511 |
|
|
|
43,209 |
|
|
|
38,261 |
|
|
|
42,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
40,008 |
|
|
|
43,209 |
|
|
|
40,578 |
|
|
|
42,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Amounts include stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of online revenues |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
Cost of events revenues |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
3,389 |
|
|
|
5,172 |
|
Product development |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
3,369 |
|
See accompanying notes.
4
TECHTARGET, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,706 |
|
|
$ |
(2,506 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
5,160 |
|
Provision for bad debt |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Amortization of investment premiums |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
5,654 |
|
|
|
9,166 |
|
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
(1,805 |
) |
Excess tax benefit stock options |
|
|
(708 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(2,491 |
) |
|
|
(6,266 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
|
506 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
(472 |
) |
Accrued compensation expenses |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
539 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
10,572 |
|
|
|
8,594 |
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment, and other assets |
|
|
(3,596 |
) |
|
|
(4,041 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(31,436 |
) |
|
|
(38,256 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments |
|
|
17,370 |
|
|
|
37,545 |
|
Acquisition of businesses |
|
|
(2,049 |
) |
|
|
(1,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(19,711 |
) |
|
|
(6,542 |
) |
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefitstock options |
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(7,283 |
) |
|
|
2,926 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
32,584 |
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
25,301 |
|
|
$ |
23,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
3,601 |
|
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
TECHTARGET, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except share and per share data, or as otherwise stated)
1. Organization and Operations
TechTarget, Inc. (the Company) is a leading provider of specialized online content that
brings together buyers and sellers of corporate information technology (IT) products. The Company
sells customized marketing programs that enable IT vendors to reach corporate IT decision makers
who are actively researching specific IT purchases. Online content is specifically defined as
those advertising and media offerings being available to users via internet websites as opposed to
traditional offline media offerings available in print, radio and television advertising.
The Companys integrated content platform consists of a network of more than 100 websites that
are complemented with targeted in-person events. During the critical stages of the purchase
decision process, these content offerings meet IT professionals needs for expert, peer and IT
vendor information, and provide a platform on which IT vendors can launch targeted marketing
campaigns that generate measurable, high return on investment (ROI). As IT professionals have
become increasingly specialized, they have come to rely on the Companys sector-specific websites
for purchasing decision support. The Companys content enables IT professionals to navigate the
complex and rapidly changing IT landscape where purchasing decisions can have significant financial
and operational consequences. Based upon the logical clustering of users respective job
responsibilities and the marketing focus of the products that the Companys customers are
advertising, content offerings are currently categorized across nine distinct media groups:
Application Architecture and Development; Channel; CIO/IT Strategy; Data Center and Virtualization
Technologies; Business Applications and Analytics; Networking; Security; Storage; and
TechnologyGuide.com.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the application of certain
significant accounting policies as described below and elsewhere in these notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, which include KnowledgeStorm, Inc., Bitpipe, Inc., TechTarget Securities
Corporation, TechTarget Limited and TechTarget (HK) Limited (TTGT HK). KnowledgeStorm, Inc. and
Bitpipe, Inc. are leading websites providing in-depth vendor generated content targeted toward
corporate IT professionals. TechTarget Securities Corporation is a Massachusetts Securities
Corporation incorporated in 2004. TechTarget Limited is a subsidiary doing business principally in
the United Kingdom. TechTarget (HK) Limited is a subsidiary incorporated in Hong Kong in August
2010 in order to facilitate the Companys activities in Asia-Pac. Additionally, as of October 1,
2010, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, TTGT HK, the Company effectively controls a variable
interest entity (VIE), Keji Wangtuo Information Technology Co., Ltd, (KWIT), which was
incorporated under the laws of the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) on November 27, 2007.
PRC laws and regulations prohibit or restrict foreign ownership of Internet-related services
and advertising businesses. To comply with these foreign ownership restrictions, the Company
operates its websites and provides online advertising services in the PRC through this VIE. The
Company has entered into certain exclusive agreements with the VIE and its shareholders through
TTGT HK, which obligate TTGT HK to absorb the risk of loss from the VIEs activities and entitles
TTGT HK to receive their residual returns. In addition, the Company has entered into certain
agreements with the authorized parties through TTGT HK, including Management and Consulting
Services, Voting Proxy, Equity Pledge and Option Agreements.
Based on these contractual arrangements, the Company consolidates the VIE as required by
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) subtopic 810-10 (ASC 810-10), Consolidation: Overall,
because the Company holds all the variable interests of the VIE through TTGT HK, which is the
primary beneficiary of the VIE. Despite the lack of technical majority ownership, there exists a
parent-subsidiary relationship between the Company and the VIE through the aforementioned
agreements, whereby the equity holders of the VIEs effectively assigned all of their voting rights
underlying their equity interest in the VIE to TTGT HK. In addition, through the other
aforementioned agreements, the Company demonstrates its ability and intention to continue to
exercise the ability to obtain substantially all of the profits and absorb all of the expected
losses of the VIE. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between the Company, its
subsidiaries, and the VIE have been eliminated in consolidation.
6
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial
statements. All adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are considered necessary for a
fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods shown, are of a normal recurring
nature and have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The results of operations
for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other
interim periods or for the full year. The information included in these consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in this report and the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010.
Reclassifications
In 2011, the Company changed the manner in which it allocates real estate facilities costs to
align with actual departmental headcount. Previously, these costs were all included as a part of
general and administrative expenses. Amounts in the prior years financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. In the three months ended September 30,
2010 this resulted in additional online cost of sales, events cost of sales, sales and marketing
and product development expense of $347, $65, $416 and $140, respectively, offset by a decrease in
general and administrative expense of $968. In the nine months ended September 30, 2010 this
resulted in additional online cost of sales, events cost of sales, sales and marketing and product
development expense of $1.1 million, $0.2 million, $1.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively,
offset by a decrease in general and administrative expense of $3.2 million.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company generates substantially all of its revenue from the sale of targeted advertising
campaigns that are delivered via its network of websites and events. Revenue is recognized only
when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service
is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
Although each of the Companys online media offerings can be sold separately, the majority of
the Companys online media sales involve multiple online offerings, which are described in more
detail below. During fiscal 2010 and prior, because objective evidence of fair value did not exist
for all elements in the Companys bundled advertising campaigns, no allocation could be made among
the various elements, so the Company recognized revenue on all units of accounting ratably over the
term of the arrangement. In September 2009, the FASB ratified Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
2009-13, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, which updates the existing
multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance included in ASC 605-25. ASU 2009-13 requires
companies to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable by using a best estimate of
selling price of individual deliverables in the arrangement in the absence of vendor-specific
objective evidence or other third party evidence of selling price. The Company adopted the new
standard, beginning on January 1, 2011, on a prospective basis. Because neither vendor-specific
objective evidence of fair value nor third party evidence of selling price exists for all elements
in the Companys bundled advertising campaigns, the Company uses an estimated selling price which
represents managements best estimate of the stand-alone selling price of deliverables for each
deliverable in an arrangement. The Company uses the relative selling price method to allocate
consideration at the inception of the arrangement to each deliverable in a multiple element
arrangement. The relative selling price method allocates any discount in the arrangement
proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of the
deliverables best estimated selling price. Revenue is
then recognized as delivery occurs. For content posted on websites, revenue recognition is
generally over the period the content is available.
The Company has concluded that adoption of this standard did not materially affect results in
the first nine months of 2011, nor is it expected to materially affect future periods.
7
Event Sponsorships. Revenue from vendor-sponsored events, whether sponsored exclusively by a
single vendor or in a multi-vendor sponsored event, is recognized upon completion of the event in
the period the event occurs. The majority of the Companys events are free to qualified attendees;
however, certain events are based on a paid attendee model. The Company recognizes revenue for paid
attendee events upon completion of the event and receipt of payment from the attendee. Amounts
collected or billed prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria are recorded as
deferred revenue.
Online Media. Revenue for specific online media offerings is recognized as follows:
|
|
|
White Papers. White paper revenue is recognized ratably over the
period in which the white paper is available on the Companys
websites. |
|
|
|
Webcasts, Podcasts, Videocasts and Virtual Trade Shows. Webcast,
podcast, videocast, virtual trade show and similar content revenue
is recognized ratably over the period in which the webcast, podcast,
videocast or virtual trade show is available on the Companys
websites. |
|
|
|
Custom Media. Custom media revenue is recognized ratably over the
period in which the custom media is available on the Companys
websites. |
|
|
|
Promotional E-mails and E-newsletters. Promotional e-mail revenue
is recognized ratably over the period in which the related content
is available on its websites because promotional e-mails do not have
standalone value from the related content. E-newsletter revenue is
recognized in the period in which the e-newsletter is sent. |
|
|
|
List Rentals. List rental revenue is recognized in the period in
which the e-mail is sent to the list of registered members. |
|
|
|
Banners. Banner revenue is recognized in the period in which the banner impressions occur. |
|
|
|
Third Party Revenue Sharing Arrangements. Revenue from third party
revenue sharing arrangements is recognized on a net basis in the
period in which the services are performed. For certain third party
agreements where the Company is the primary obligor, revenue is
recognized on a gross basis in the period in which the services are
performed. |
Amounts collected or billed prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria are
recorded as deferred revenue.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short and long-term investments,
accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying value of these instruments approximates
their estimated fair values.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets consist primarily of property and equipment, goodwill and other intangible
assets. A specifically identified intangible asset must be recorded as a separate asset from
goodwill if either of the following two criteria is met: (1) the intangible asset acquired arises
from contractual or other legal rights; or (2) the intangible asset is separable. Accordingly,
intangible assets consist of specifically identified intangible assets. Goodwill is the excess of
any purchase price over the estimated fair market value of net tangible assets acquired.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are reviewed annually
for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Separable intangible assets that
are not deemed to have an indefinite life are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which
range from one to nine years, using methods of amortization that are expected to reflect the
estimated pattern of economic use, and are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances suggest that the assets may not be recoverable. The Company performs its annual test
of impairment of goodwill as of December 31st of each year and whenever events or changes in
circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Based on this evaluation,
the Company believes that, as of each of the balance sheet dates presented, none of the Companys
goodwill or other long-lived assets was impaired. The Company did not have any intangible assets
with indefinite lives as of September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
8
Internal-Use Software and Website Development Costs
The Company capitalizes costs incurred during the development of its website applications and
infrastructure as well as certain costs relating to internal-use software. The estimated useful
life of costs capitalized is evaluated for each specific project. Capitalized internal-use
software and website development costs are reviewed for recoverability whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable and
exceeds its fair value. The Company capitalized internal-use software and website development costs
of $1.0 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and $2.6 million and $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary
differences between the financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using
statutory rates. If required, a valuation allowance is established against net deferred tax assets
if, based upon available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized. The Company recognizes any interest and penalties related to uncertain
tax positions in income tax expense.
Stock-Based Compensation
At September 30, 2011, the Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans which are
more fully described in Note 11. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based
on the fair value of the award and is recognized in the Statement of Operations on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period of the award or using the accelerated method if the award is
contingent upon performance goals. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to
determine the fair value of stock option awards.
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares and
vested restricted stock awards outstanding during the period. Because the holders of unvested
restricted stock awards do not have nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, the
Company does not consider these awards to be participating securities that should be included in
its computation of earnings per share under the two-class method. Diluted earnings per share is
computed using the weighted average number of common shares and vested restricted stock awards
outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of potential future issuances of common
stock relating to stock option programs and other potentially dilutive securities using the
treasury stock method. In calculating diluted earnings per share, the dilutive effect of stock
options is computed using the average market price for the respective period. In addition, the
assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method include the average unrecognized compensation
expense and assumed tax benefit of stock options that are in-the-money. This results in the
assumed buyback of additional shares, thereby reducing the dilutive impact of stock options.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements (ASU
2009-14). ASU 2009-14 amends guidance included within Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Topic 985-605 to exclude tangible products containing software components and non-software
components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality. Entities that
sell joint hardware and software products that meet this scope exception will be required to follow
the guidance of ASU 2009-13. ASU 2009-14 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption and retrospective application are also permitted. The Company determined that adopting
the provisions of ASU 2009-14 did not impact its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma
Information for Business Combinations (Topic 805), which specifies that if a public entity presents
financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as
though the business combination(s) that occurred during the year occurred as of the beginning of
the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This ASU also expands the supplemental pro
forma disclosure. The ASU is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or after the annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of
this standard did not affect the Companys consolidated financial statements.
9
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS ("ASU 2011-04"), which
provides common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair
value measurements in accordance with GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS). ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles, clarifies the application
of existing fair value measurement and expands ASC 820 disclosure requirements, particularly for
Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective during interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application is prohibited. The Company is currently
assessing the potential impact of this standard but does not expect the adoption of the standard to
have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which
requires entities to present reclassification adjustments included in other comprehensive income on
the face of the financial statements and allows entities to present the total of comprehensive
income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a
single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.
It also eliminates the option for entities to present the components of other comprehensive income
as part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity. For public companies, ASU 2011-05 is
effective for fiscal years (and interim periods within those years) beginning after December 15,
2011, with earlier adoption permitted. ASU 2011-05 impacts disclosure only and, therefore, is not
expected to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASC update No. 2010-28, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other
(Topic 350), When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero
or Negative Carrying Amounts a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, which modifies
Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts.
For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test
if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The qualitative factors that an
entity should consider when evaluating whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill
impairment exists are consistent with the existing guidance for determining whether an impairment
exists between annual tests. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the
Companys financial statements. This update was effective for fiscal periods beginning after
December 15, 2010.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08: Testing for Goodwill Impairment, which amends
current goodwill impairment testing guidance by providing entities with an option to perform a
qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary
to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-08 will be effective for interim and
annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with
early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of this standard
but does not expect the adoption of the standard to have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
3. Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures certain financial assets at fair value on a recurring basis, including
cash equivalents, and short and long-term investments. The fair value of these financial assets was
determined based on three levels of input as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets; and |
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs. |
10
The fair value hierarchy of the Companys financial assets and liabilities carried at fair
value and measured on a recurring basis is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Money market funds(1) |
|
$ |
9,823 |
|
|
$ |
9,823 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Short-term investments(2) |
|
|
21,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments(2) |
|
|
9,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40,815 |
|
|
$ |
9,823 |
|
|
$ |
30,992 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Money market funds(1) |
|
$ |
23,375 |
|
|
$ |
23,375 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Short-term investments(2) |
|
|
17,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40,925 |
|
|
$ |
23,375 |
|
|
$ |
17,550 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in cash and cash equivalents on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets; valued at quoted market
prices in active markets. |
|
(2) |
|
Our short and long-term investments consist of government agency and municipal bonds; their fair value is
calculated using an interest rate yield curve for similar instruments. |
4. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with maturities of three months
or less at date of purchase. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates their fair
market value. Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
15,478 |
|
|
$ |
9,209 |
|
Money market funds |
|
|
9,823 |
|
|
|
23,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
25,301 |
|
|
$ |
32,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys short and long-term investments are accounted for as available for sale
securities. These investments are recorded at fair value with the related unrealized gains and
losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders
equity, net of tax. The unrealized gain (loss), net of taxes, was $10 and $(5) as of September 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Realized gains and losses on the sale of these
investments are determined using the specific identification method. There were no realized gains
or losses during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2011 or 2010.
Short and long-term investments consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Short and long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
30,976 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
30,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short and long-term investments |
|
$ |
30,976 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
30,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Short and long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency bonds |
|
$ |
2,008 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,009 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
15,550 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
15,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short and long-term investments |
|
$ |
17,558 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
17,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had eight debt securities in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011.
All of these securities have been in such a position for less than 12 months; the unrealized loss
on those securities was approximately $11 and the fair value was $15.9 million. As of September
30, 2011, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
All income generated from these investments is recorded as interest income.
5. Acquisitions
On April 26, 2011 the Company acquired the websites, product offerings, and events associated
with Computer Weekly and its sister channel-targeted brand, MicroScope, from Reed Business
Information Limited for $2.0 million in cash plus the payment of approximately $0.4 million in
restructuring costs relating to redundancy costs of Computer Weekly employees not brought over as
part of the acquisition.
In connection with this acquisition, the Companys preliminary allocation of purchase price is
approximately $40 of net tangible assets, $147 of goodwill and $1.9 million of intangible assets
related to customer relationships, a member database, a non-compete agreement and trade names with
estimated useful lives ranging from two to five years.
The estimated fair value of the $1.9 million of acquired intangible assets is assigned as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Useful Life |
|
|
Value (in 000s) |
|
Customer relationship |
|
60 months |
|
$ |
825 |
|
Member database |
|
60 months |
|
|
512 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
24 months |
|
|
100 |
|
Trade name |
|
60 months |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company engaged a third party valuation specialist to assist management in determining the
fair value of the intangible assets of the Computer Weekly and MicroScope businesses. To value the
customer relationship assets, an income approach was used, specifically a variation of the
discounted cash-flow method known as the multi-period excess earnings method. The projected net
cash flows were discounted using a discount rate of 28.3%. To value the member database, a
replacement cost approach was used, specifically a calculation of costs to acquire new members
based on the cost to acquire new members in 2010 divided by new members acquired. Additionally,
the present value of the sum of projected lost profits was added to the calculated replacement cost
to calculate the total fair value of the member database asset. To value the non-compete agreement,
a comparative business valuation method was used. Based on a non-compete term of 24 months,
management projected net cash flows for the Company with and without the non-compete agreement in
place. The present value of the sum of the difference between the net cash flows with and without
the non-compete agreement in place was calculated, based on a discount rate of 28.3%. To value the
trade name intangible asset, a relief from royalty method was used to estimate the pre-tax royalty
savings to the Company related to the Computer Weekly and MicroScope trade names. The projected
net cash flows from the pre-tax royalty savings were tax affected using an effective rate of 26%
and then discounted using a discount rate of 28.3% to calculate the value of the trade name
intangible asset.
12
6. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets subject to amortization as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Lives |
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Customer, affiliate
and advertiser
relationships |
|
1 - 9 |
|
$ |
8,982 |
|
|
$ |
(4,178 |
) |
|
$ |
4,804 |
|
Developed websites |
|
3 - 6 |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
(3,975 |
) |
|
|
1,425 |
|
Trademark, trade name
and domain name |
|
1 - 7 |
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
(894 |
) |
|
|
1,076 |
|
Proprietary user
information database
and Internet traffic |
|
3 - 5 |
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
(3,410 |
) |
|
|
1,812 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
1 - 3 |
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
|
|
$ |
22,121 |
|
|
$ |
(12,785 |
) |
|
$ |
9,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Lives |
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Customer, affiliate
and advertiser
relationships |
|
1 - 9 |
|
$ |
12,879 |
|
|
$ |
(7,654 |
) |
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
Developed websites |
|
3 - 6 |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
(3,300 |
) |
|
|
2,100 |
|
Trademark, trade name
and domain name |
|
1 - 7 |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
(1,526 |
) |
|
|
847 |
|
Proprietary user
information database
and Internet traffic |
|
3 - 5 |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
(3,354 |
) |
|
|
2,046 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
1 - 3 |
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
|
|
$ |
27,625 |
|
|
$ |
(17,156 |
) |
|
$ |
10,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from one to
nine years, using methods of amortization that are expected to reflect the estimated pattern of
economic use. The remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period
of approximately 2.3 years. Amortization expense was $1.0 million and $1.1 million for the three
month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $3.0 million and $3.4 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense is
recorded within operating expenses as the intangible assets consist of customer-related assets and
website traffic that the Company considers to be in support of selling and marketing activities.
The Company wrote off $7.5 million of fully amortized intangible assets to date in 2011.
The Company expects amortization expense of intangible assets to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
Years Ending December 31: |
|
Expense |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
2011
(October 1st December 31st) |
|
$ |
946 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,351 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,405 |
|
2015 |
|
|
1,157 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
13
7. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted
net income (loss) per common share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
2,706 |
|
|
$ |
(2,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock
outstanding |
|
|
38,510,512 |
|
|
|
43,209,433 |
|
|
|
38,260,943 |
|
|
|
42,877,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock
outstanding |
|
|
38,510,512 |
|
|
|
43,209,433 |
|
|
|
38,260,943 |
|
|
|
42,877,631 |
|
Effect of potentially dilutive shares(1) |
|
|
1,497,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,316,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average shares of common stock
outstanding |
|
|
40,008,284 |
|
|
|
43,209,433 |
|
|
|
40,577,776 |
|
|
|
42,877,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In calculating diluted earnings per share, all shares related to outstanding stock options, unvested restricted stock awards and
warrants were excluded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 because they were anti-dilutive due to the Companys
loss position for those periods. Additionally, outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock awards having an exercise
price in excess of the average market value of the Companys common stock during the respective period were excluded for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011 because they were anti-dilutive. |
8. Credit Facility
The Companys $5.0 million revolving credit facility was amended in August 2011, extending its
term and adjusting certain other financial terms and covenants. Unless earlier payment is required
by an event of default, all principal and unpaid interest will be due and payable on August 31,
2016. At the Companys option, the Revolving Credit Facility (Credit Agreement) bears interest at
either the prime rate less 1.00% or the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus the applicable
LIBOR margin. The applicable LIBOR margin is based on the ratio of total funded debt to earnings
before interest, other income and expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA)
for the preceding four fiscal quarters. As of September 30, 2011, the applicable LIBOR margin,
which was the operative rate during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, was 1.25%.
The Company is also required to pay an unused line fee on the daily unused amount of its
Revolving Credit Facility at a per annum rate based on the ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA for
the preceding four fiscal quarters. As of September 30, 2011, the per annum unused line fee rate
was 0.20%.
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 there were no amounts outstanding under this
Credit Agreement. There was a $1.5 million standby letter of credit related to the Companys
corporate headquarters lease that was outstanding at September 30, 2011, bringing our available
borrowings on the $5.0 million facility to $3.5 million.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are collateralized by a security interest in
substantially all assets of the Company. Covenants governing the Credit Agreement include the
maintenance of certain financial ratios. At September 30, 2011 the Company was in compliance with
all covenants under the Credit Agreement.
14
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
The Company conducts its operations in leased office facilities under various non-cancelable
operating lease agreements that expire through February 2020. Future minimum lease payments under
the Companys non-cancelable operating leases at September 30, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Lease |
|
Years Ending December 31: |
|
Payments |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
2011
(October 1st December 31st) |
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
2012 |
|
|
4,084 |
|
2013 |
|
|
3,170 |
|
2014 |
|
|
3,172 |
|
2015 |
|
|
3,191 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
13,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has an irrevocable standby letter of credit outstanding in the aggregate amount of
$1.5 million. This letter of credit supports the lease the Company entered into in 2009 for its
corporate headquarters. This letter of credit extends, subject to certain reductions, annually
through February 28, 2020 unless notification of termination is received.
Net Worth Tax Contingency
In late March 2010, the Company received a letter from the Department of Revenue of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (the MA DOR) requesting documentation demonstrating that TechTarget
Securities Corporation (TSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, has been classified by
the MA DOR as a Massachusetts security corporation. Following subsequent correspondence with the
MA DOR and a settlement conference on March 22, 2011, the Company received on July 16, 2011 a
Notice of Assessment from MA DOR for 2006 and 2007 in the amount of approximately $198 (which
amount included all interest and penalties to date) with respect to additional excise taxes on net
worth related to TSC. Based on the Companys previous assessment that it was probable that the MA
DOR would require an adjustment to correct TSCs tax filings such that it will be treated as a
Massachusetts business corporation for the applicable years, for the year ended December 31, 2010,
the Company recorded a liability of approximately $200, representing its best estimate at that time
of the potential net worth tax exposure. The tax benefits available to a Massachusetts security
corporation are comprised of (i) lower income tax rate (1.32% vs. 9.5%) and (ii) exemption from the
0.26% excise tax on net worth. On August 17, 2011, the Company filed Applications for Abatement
with the MA DOR and intends to continue to dispute the assessment and believes it has meritorious
defenses which it intends to vigorously assert. There were no changes to the net worth tax reserve
assessment as of September 30, 2011.
Litigation
From time to time and in the ordinary course of business, the Company may be subject to
various claims, charges, and litigation. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company
did not have any pending claims, charges, or litigation that it expects would have a material
adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
10. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity during a period, except those
resulting from investments by stockholders and distributions to stockholders. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 the Companys comprehensive income (loss) is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
$ |
2,706 |
|
|
$ |
(2,506 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments (net of tax
effect of $7, $(13), $12 and $(44), respectively) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
Unrealized (loss) gain on foreign currency exchange |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
$ |
(636 |
) |
|
$ |
2,637 |
|
|
$ |
(2,581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
11. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Option Plans
In September 1999, the Company approved a stock option plan (the 1999 Plan) that provides
for the issuance of up to 12,384,646 shares of common stock incentives. The 1999 Plan provides for
the granting of incentive stock options (ISOs), nonqualified stock options (NSOs), and stock
grants. These incentives may be offered to the Companys employees, officers, directors,
consultants, and advisors, as defined. ISOs may not be granted at less than fair market value on
the date of grant, as determined by the Companys Board of Directors (the Board). Each option
shall be exercisable at such times and subject to such terms as determined by the Board; grants
generally vest over a four year period and expire no later than ten years after the grant date.
In April 2007, the Board approved the 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan),
which was approved by the stockholders and became effective upon the consummation of the Companys
IPO in May 2007. Effective upon the consummation of the IPO, no further awards were made pursuant
to the 1999 Plan, but any outstanding awards under the 1999 Plan will remain in effect and will
continue to be subject to the terms of the 1999 Plan. The 2007 Plan allows the Company to grant
ISOs, NSOs, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock awards, restricted stock and other awards.
Under the 2007 Plan, stock options may not be granted at less than fair market value on the date of
grant, and grants generally vest over a four year period. Stock options granted under the 2007 Plan
expire no later than ten years after the grant date. The Company has reserved an aggregate of
2,911,667 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2007 Plan plus an additional annual
increase to be added automatically on January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2008, equal
to the lesser of (a) 2% of the outstanding number of shares of common stock (on a fully-diluted
basis) on the immediately preceding December 31 and (b) such lower number of shares as may be
determined by the Companys compensation committee. The number of shares available for issuance
under the 2007 Plan is subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, stock dividend or other
change in capitalization. Generally, shares that are forfeited or cancelled from awards under the
2007 Plan also will be available for future awards. In addition, shares subject to stock options
returned to the 1999 Plan, as a result of their expiration, cancellation or termination, are
automatically made available for issuance under the 2007 Plan. As of September 30, 2011 a total of
1,342,042 shares were available for grant under the 2007 Plan.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value
of an award. The Company calculated the fair values of the options granted using the following
estimated weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
79.83 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
79.41 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
Expected term |
|
6.25 years |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
6.25 years |
|
|
6.25 years |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share |
|
$ |
4.39 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
4.77 |
|
|
$ |
3.89 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
There were no grants during the third quarter of 2010. |
As there was no public market for the Companys common stock prior to the Companys IPO
in May 2007, and limited historical information on the volatility of its common stock since the
date of the Companys IPO, the Company determined the volatility for options granted in the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 based on an analysis of the historical volatility
of the Companys stock and reported data for a peer group of companies that issued options with
substantially similar terms. The expected volatility of options granted has been determined using a
weighted average of the historical volatility of the Companys stock and the peer group of
companies for a period equal to the expected life of the option. The expected life of options has
been determined utilizing the simplified method. The risk-free interest rate is based on a zero
coupon United States treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the
stock options. The Company has not paid and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its shares
of common stock; therefore, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero. The Company applied
estimated annual forfeiture rates of 3.6% and 2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively based on its historical forfeiture experience in determining the expense
recorded in those periods.
16
A summary of the stock option activity under the Companys stock option plan for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Year-to-Date Activity |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Term in Years |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
7,095,090 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(200,285 |
) |
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(51,836 |
) |
|
|
5.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(51,000 |
) |
|
|
9.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
6,831,969 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
5,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
5,953,999 |
|
|
$ |
6.45 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
5,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested or expected to vest at
September 30, 2011 (1) |
|
|
6,764,541 |
|
|
$ |
6.42 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
5,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition to the vested options, the Company expects a portion of the unvested options to
vest at some point in the future. Options expected to vest is calculated by applying an
estimated forfeiture rate to the unvested options. |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the total intrinsic value of options
exercised (i.e. the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the
employee to exercise the options) was $482 and $631, respectively, and the total amount of cash
received from exercise of these options was $1,148 and $663, respectively. The total grant date
fair value of stock options granted after January 1, 2006 that vested during the nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $1.7 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards
Restricted stock awards are valued at the market price of a share of the Companys common
stock on the date of grant. A summary of the restricted stock award activity under the 2007 Stock
Plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Ave. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic |
|
Year-to-Date Activity |
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Nonvested outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,693,453 |
|
|
$ |
5.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
85,217 |
|
|
|
7.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(513,839 |
) |
|
|
4.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(119,640 |
) |
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested outstanding at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,145,191 |
|
|
$ |
5.69 |
|
|
$ |
12,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total grant-date fair value of restricted stock awards that vested during the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $2.4 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
12. Stockholders Equity
Reserved Common Stock
As of September 30, 2011, the Company has reserved 11,037,452 shares of common stock for
options outstanding and available for grant under stock option plans.
Warrants
In connection with an acquisition in May 2000, the Company issued to the seller a warrant to
purchase 40,625 shares of common stock at a price of $2.36 per share. In 2007, the seller exercised
warrants to purchase 30,981 shares of common stock using the conversion rights in the warrants. As
result of the exercise using the conversion rights, the Company issued 26,024 shares of common
stock to the seller and cancelled the 4,957 shares received in lieu of payment of the exercise
price. In 2008, the seller exercised additional warrants to purchase 8,375 shares of common stock
using the conversion rights in the warrants. As a result of the exercise using the conversion
rights, the Company issued 6,886 shares of common stock to the seller and cancelled the 1,489
shares received in lieu of payment of the exercise price. The balance of the unexercised portion of
the warrant expired in the second quarter of 2010.
17
13. Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate was 52% and (81)% for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively. The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September
30, 2011 includes a discrete tax expense of $65 related to a state tax assessment for a prior
period. The effective tax rate excluding the discrete tax expense was 51% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011. The change in the effective tax rate excluding the discrete tax expense
was as a result of applying the provision of ASC 740, Income Taxes, as it relates to interim
periods. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company calculated the provision for
income taxes using a forecasted tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2011. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, due to net operating losses, the Company calculated the provision for
income taxes using a period-to-date approach. The Company recognized interest and penalties
totaling $21 in income tax expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company had recorded a tax reserve of approximately
$400 for the potential state income tax liability arising from the difference between the income
tax rates applicable for security corporations and business corporations in Massachusetts, relating
to the matter described in Note 9. In connection with such matter, on July 21, 2011, the Company
received a Notice of Assessment from MA DOR for 2006 and 2007 in the amount of approximately $345
(which amount included all interest and penalties to date) with respect to additional income taxes
related to TechTarget, Inc. The Company increased the reserve assessment to reflect additional
interest accrued through the third quarter of 2011. The balance of the reserve assessment as of
September 30, 2011 was $426. On August 17, 2011, the Company filed Applications for Abatement with
the MA DOR and intends to continue to dispute the assessment and believes it has meritorious
defenses which it intends to vigorously assert.
Tax years 2007 through 2010 are subject to examination by the federal and state taxing
authorities. There are no income tax examinations currently in process with the exception of the
TSC matter noted above related to the MA DOR.
14. Segment Information
The Company views its operations and manages its business as one operating segment based on
factors such as how the Company manages its operations and how its CEO and President review results
and make decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance.
Geographic Data
Net sales to unaffiliated customers by geographic area were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
North America |
|
$ |
23,508 |
|
|
$ |
20,913 |
|
|
$ |
70,174 |
|
|
$ |
64,675 |
|
International |
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,892 |
|
|
$ |
22,001 |
|
|
$ |
76,560 |
|
|
$ |
68,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and
the other financial information included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In this
discussion and analysis, dollar, share and per share amounts are not rounded to thousands unless
otherwise indicated. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those
discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, particularly under the heading
Risk Factors.
Overview
Background
We are a leading provider of specialized online content that brings together buyers and
sellers of corporate information technology ("IT) products. We sell customized marketing programs
that enable IT vendors to reach corporate IT decision makers who are actively researching specific
IT purchases.
Our integrated content platform consists of a network of approximately 100 websites that we
complement with targeted in-person events. During the critical stages of the purchase decision
process, these content offerings meet IT professionals needs for expert, peer and IT vendor
information, and provide a platform on which IT vendors can launch targeted marketing campaigns
that generate measurable, high Return on Investment ("ROI). As IT professionals have become
increasingly specialized, they have come to rely on our sector-specific websites for purchasing
decision support. Our content enables IT professionals to navigate the complex and rapidly changing
IT landscape where purchasing decisions can have significant financial and operational
consequences. Based upon the logical clustering of our users respective job responsibilities and
the marketing focus of the products that our customers are advertising, we currently categorize our
content offerings across nine distinct media groups: Application Architecture and Development;
Channel; CIO/IT Strategy; Data Center and Virtualization Technologies; Business Applications and
Analytics; Networking; Security; Storage; and TechnologyGuide.com.
Recent Acquisition
On April 26, 2011 we announced that we had completed the acquisition of the websites, product
offerings, and events associated with Computer Weekly and its sister channel-targeted brand,
MicroScope, from Reed Business Information Limited. Computer Weekly, through its websites and events (and print
properties, which were not continued), has served UK Managers, Directors and CIOs monitoring the
technology landscape, and the advertisers looking to reach them. Computer Weekly and MicroScope
also serve UK IT decision makers by bringing technology news and IT management focused content.
These two websites will complement our established offerings in the region, including
SearchDataManagement.co.uk, SearchNetworking.co.uk, SearchSecurity.co.uk, SearchStorage.co.uk, and
SearchVirtualDataCentre.co.uk, by giving advertisers new ways to reach key UK and European IT
decision makers.
Sources of Revenues
We sell advertising programs to IT vendors targeting a specific audience within a particular
IT sector or sub-sector. We maintain multiple points of contact with our customers to provide
support throughout their organizations and the sales cycle. As a result, our customers often run
multiple advertising programs with us in order to reach discrete portions of our targeted audience.
There are multiple factors that can impact our customers advertising objectives and spending with
us, including but not limited to, product launches, increases or decreases to their advertising
budgets, the timing of key industry marketing events, responses to competitor activities and
efforts to address specific marketing objectives such as creating brand awareness or generating
sales leads. Our services are generally delivered under short-term contracts that run for the
length of a given advertising program, typically less than six months.
19
We generate substantially all of our revenues from the sale of targeted advertising campaigns
that we deliver via our network of websites and in-person events.
Online. The majority of our revenue is derived from the delivery of our online offerings.
Online revenue
represented approximately 84% and 86% of total revenues for the three months ended September
30, 2011 and 2010, and approximately 87% and 85% of total revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010. We expect the majority of our revenues to be derived through the
delivery of online offerings for the foreseeable future. As a result of our customers advertising
objectives and preferences, the specific allocation of online advertising offerings sold and
delivered by us, on a period by period basis, can fluctuate.
Through our websites we sell a variety of online media offerings to connect IT vendors to IT
professionals. Our lead generation offerings allow IT vendors to capture qualified sales leads from
the distribution and promotion of content to our audience of IT professionals. Our branding
offerings provide IT vendors exposure to targeted audiences of IT professionals actively
researching information related to their products and services.
Our branding offerings include banners and e-newsletters. Banner advertising can be purchased
on specific websites within our network. We also offer the ability to advertise in e-newsletters
focused on key site sub-topics across our portfolio of websites. These offerings give IT vendors
the ability to increase their brand awareness to highly specialized IT sectors.
Our lead generation offerings include the following:
|
|
|
White Papers. White papers are technical documents created by IT
vendors to describe business or technical problems that are
addressed by the vendors products or services. IT vendors pay us to
have their white papers distributed to our users and receive
targeted promotions on our relevant websites. Prior to viewing white
papers, our registered members and visitors supply their corporate
contact and qualification information and agree to receive further
information from the vendor. The corporate contact and other
qualification information for these leads are supplied to the vendor
in real time through our proprietary lead management software. |
|
|
|
Webcasts, Podcasts, Videocasts, and Virtual Trade Shows. IT vendors
pay us to sponsor and host webcasts, podcasts, videocasts, virtual
trade shows and similar content that bring informational sessions
directly to attendees desktops and, in the case of podcasts,
directly to their mobile devices. As is the case with white papers,
our users supply their corporate contact and qualification
information to the webcast, podcast, videocast or virtual trade show
sponsor when they view or download the content. Sponsorship includes
access to the registrant information and visibility before, during
and after the event. |
|
|
|
Promotional E-mails. IT vendors pay us to further target the
promotion of their white papers, webcasts, videocasts, podcasts or
similar media by including their content in our periodic e-mail
updates to the relevant registered users of our websites. Users who
have voluntarily registered on our websites receive an e-mail update
from us when vendor content directly related to their interests is
listed on our sites. |
|
|
|
List Rentals. We also offer IT vendors the ability to message
relevant registered members on topics related to their interests. IT
vendors can rent our e-mail and postal lists of registered members
using specific criteria such as company size, geography or job
title. |
|
|
|
Contextual Advertising. Our contextual advertising programs
associate IT vendor white papers, webcasts, podcasts, virtual trade
shows or other content on a particular topic with our related
sector-specific content. IT vendors have the option to purchase
exclusive sponsorship of content related to their product or
category. |
|
|
|
Third Party Revenue Sharing Arrangements. We have arrangements with
certain third parties, including for the licensing of our online
content, for the renting of our database of opted-in e-mail
subscribers and for which advertising from customers of certain
third parties is made available to our website visitors. In each of
these arrangements we are paid a share of the resulting revenue. |
Events. Events revenue represented approximately 16% and 14% of total revenues for the three
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and approximately 13% and 15% of total revenues for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Most of our media groups operate revenue generating
events. The majority of our events are free to IT professionals and are sponsored by IT vendors.
Attendees are pre-screened based on event-specific criteria such as sector-specific budget size,
company size, or job title. We offer three types of events: multi-day conferences, single-day
seminars and custom events. Multi-day conferences provide independent expert content for our
attendees and allow vendors to purchase exhibit space and other sponsorship offerings that enable
interaction with the attendees. We also hold single-day seminars on various topics in major cities.
These seminars provide independent content on key sub-topics in the sectors we serve, are free to
qualified attendees, and offer multiple vendors the ability to interact with specific, targeted
audiences actively focused on buying decisions. Our custom events differ from our conferences and
seminars in that they are exclusively sponsored by a single IT vendor, and the content is driven
primarily by the sole sponsor.
20
Cost of Revenues, Operating Expenses and Other
Expenses consist of cost of revenues, selling and marketing, product development, general and
administrative, depreciation, and amortization expenses. Personnel-related costs are a significant
component of most of these expense categories except for depreciation and amortization.
Cost of Online Revenue. Cost of online revenue consists primarily of: salaries and related
personnel costs; member acquisition expenses (primarily keyword purchases from leading Internet
search sites); freelance writer expenses; website hosting costs; vendor expenses associated with
the delivery of webcast, podcast, videocast and similar content, and list rental offerings;
stock-based compensation expenses; facilities and other related overhead.
Cost of Events Revenue. Cost of events revenue consists primarily of: facility expenses,
including food and beverages for the event attendees as well as office space; salaries and related
personnel costs; event speaker expenses; stock-based compensation expenses; and other related
overhead.
Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expense consists primarily of: salaries and
related personnel costs; sales commissions; travel, lodging and other out-of-pocket expenses;
stock-based compensation expenses; facilities and related overhead. Sales commissions are recorded
as expense when earned by the employee, based on recorded revenue.
Product Development. Product development includes the creation and maintenance of our network
of websites, advertiser offerings and technical infrastructure. Product development expense
consists primarily of salaries and related personnel costs; stock-based compensation expenses;
facilities and other related overhead.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expense consists primarily of:
salaries and related personnel costs; accounting, legal and other professional fees; stock-based
compensation expenses; facilities and other related overhead.
Depreciation. Depreciation expense consists of the depreciation of our property and
equipment. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over
their estimated useful lives, ranging from three to five years, with the exception of leasehold
improvements, which are depreciated over the shorter of their useful life or the remaining duration
of the lease.
Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets expense consists of the
amortization of intangible assets recorded in connection with our acquisitions. Separable
intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite life are amortized over their estimated
useful lives, which range from one to nine years, using methods that are expected to reflect the
estimated pattern of economic use.
Interest Income (Expense), Net. Interest income (expense), net consists primarily of interest
income earned on cash, cash equivalents and short and long-term investments less any interest
expense incurred. We historically have invested our cash in money market accounts, municipal bonds
and government agency bonds.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On
an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue, long-lived assets,
the allowance for doubtful accounts, stock-based compensation, and income taxes. We based our
estimates of the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. In many cases, we could reasonably have
used different accounting policies and estimates. In some cases, changes in the accounting
estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Our actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. See the notes to our consolidated
financial statements for information about these critical accounting policies as well as a
description of our other accounting policies.
21
Revenue Recognition
We generate substantially all of our revenue from the sale of targeted advertising campaigns
that we deliver via our network of websites and in-person events. In all cases, we recognize
revenue only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
Although each of our online media offerings can be sold separately, most of our online media
sales involve multiple online offerings. Because objective evidence of fair value does not exist
for all elements in our bundled advertising campaigns, we use a best estimate of selling price of
individual deliverables in the arrangement in the absence of vendor-specific objective evidence or
other third party evidence of selling price. We apply a relative selling price method to allocate
arrangement consideration at the inception of the arrangement to each deliverable in a multiple
element arrangement. Revenue is then recognized as delivery occurs. For content posted on
websites, revenue recognition is generally over the period the asset is available.
Event Sponsorships. We sell our events separately from our other service offerings and
recognize sponsorship revenue from events in the period in which the event occurs. The majority of
our events are free to qualified attendees; however, certain events are based on a paid attendee
model. We recognize revenue for paid attendee events upon completion of the event and receipt of
payment from the attendee. Amounts collected or billed prior to satisfying the above revenue
recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue.
Online Media. We recognize revenue from our specific online media offerings as follows when
these items are sold separately:
|
|
|
White Papers. We recognize white paper revenue ratably over the
period in which the white paper is available on our websites. |
|
|
|
Webcasts, Podcasts, Videocasts and Virtual Trade Shows. We
recognize webcast, podcast, videocast, virtual trade show and
similar content offerings revenue ratably over the period in which
the webcast, podcast, videocast, virtual trade show or similar
content offering is available on our websites. |
|
|
|
Promotional E-mails and E-newsletters. We recognize promotional
e-mail revenue ratably over the period in which the related content
asset is available on our websites because promotional e-mails do
not have standalone value from the related content asset. We
recognize e-newsletter revenue in the period in which the
e-newsletter is sent. |
|
|
|
List Rentals. List rental revenue is recognized in the period in
which the e-mail is sent to the list of registered members. |
|
|
|
Banners. Banner revenue is recognized in the period in which the banner impressions occur. |
|
|
|
Third Party Revenue Sharing Arrangements. Revenue from third party
revenue sharing arrangements is recognized on a net basis in the
period in which the services are performed. For certain third party
agreements where we are the primary obligor, revenue is recognized
on a gross basis in the period in which the services are performed. |
Amounts collected or billed prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria are
recorded as deferred revenue.
Long-Lived Assets
Our long-lived assets consist primarily of property and equipment, goodwill and other
intangible assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets have arisen principally from our
acquisitions. The amount assigned to intangible assets is subjective and based on our estimates of
the future benefit of the intangible assets using accepted valuation techniques, such as discounted
cash flow and replacement cost models. Our long-lived assets, other than goodwill, are amortized
over their estimated useful lives, which we determined based on the consideration of several
factors including the period of time the asset is expected to remain in service. Intangible assets
are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from one to nine years, using methods
of amortization that are expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use. We evaluate the
carrying value and remaining useful lives of long-lived assets, other than goodwill, whenever
indicators of impairment are present. We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill annually and
whenever indicators of impairment are present. We use a discounted cash flow approach to determine
the fair value of goodwill.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term
investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying value of these instruments
approximates their estimated fair value.
22
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We offset gross trade accounts receivable with an allowance for doubtful accounts. The
allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our
existing accounts receivable. We review our allowance for doubtful accounts on a regular basis, and
all past due balances are reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged
against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for
recovery is considered remote. Provisions for the allowance for doubtful accounts are recorded in
general and administrative expense. If our historical collection experience does not reflect our
future ability to collect outstanding accounts receivable, our future provision for doubtful
accounts could be materially affected. To date, we have not incurred any write-offs of accounts
receivable significantly different than the amounts reserved. The allowance for doubtful accounts
was $1.2 million at September 30, 2011 and $1.0 million at December 31, 2010.
Stock-Based Compensation
We measure stock-based compensation at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and
recognize stock-based compensation expense in the Statement of Operations on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period of the award or using the accelerated method if the award is contingent
upon performance goals. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value
of stock option awards. We calculated the fair values of the options granted using the following
estimated weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
79.83 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
79.41 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
Expected term |
|
6.25 years |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
6.25 years |
|
|
6.25 years |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share |
|
$ |
4.39 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
4.77 |
|
|
$ |
3.89 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
There were no grants made in the third quarter of 2010. |
As there was no public market for our common stock prior to our initial public offering in May
2007, and there has been limited historical information on the volatility of our common stock since
the date of our initial public offering, we determined the volatility for options granted in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 based on an analysis of the historical
volatility of our stock and reported data for a peer group of companies that issued options with
substantially similar terms. The expected volatility of options granted has been determined using a
weighted average of the historical volatility of our stock and the peer group of companies for a
period equal to the expected life of the option. The risk-free interest rate is based on a zero
coupon United States treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the
stock options. We have not paid and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our shares of common
stock; therefore, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero. We applied estimated annual
forfeiture rates of 3.6% and 2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively
based on our historical forfeiture experience in determining the expense recorded in those periods.
Internal-Use Software and Website Development Costs
We capitalize costs of materials, consultants and compensation and related expenses of
employees who devote time to the development of internal-use software and website applications and
infrastructure involving developing software to operate our websites. However, we expense as
incurred website development costs for new features and functionalities since it is not probable
that they will result in additional functionality until they are both developed and tested with
confirmation that they are more effective than the current set of features and functionalities on
our websites. Our judgment is required in determining the point at which various projects enter the
states at which costs may be capitalized, in assessing the ongoing value of the capitalized costs
and in determining the estimated useful lives over which the costs are amortized, which is
generally three years. To the extent that we change the manner in which we develop and test new
features and functionalities related to our websites, assess the ongoing value of capitalized
assets or determine the estimated useful lives over which the costs are amortized, the amount of
website development costs we capitalize and amortize in future periods would be impacted. We review
capitalized internal-use software and website development costs for recoverability whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.
We would recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of the asset is not
recoverable and exceeds its fair value. We capitalized internal-use software and website
development costs of $1.0 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively, and $2.6 million and $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively.
23
Income Taxes
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and foreign jurisdictions, and we use
estimates in determining our provision for income taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and
liabilities based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and income tax bases of
assets and liabilities using statutory rates.
Our deferred tax assets are comprised primarily of net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards.
As of December 31, 2010, we had state NOL carryforwards of approximately $17.7 million, which may
be used to offset future taxable income. The NOL carryforwards expire through 2029.
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
We calculate basic earnings per share (EPS) by dividing earnings available to common
shareholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares and vested restricted
stock awards outstanding. Because the holders of unvested restricted stock awards do not have
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, we do not consider these awards to be
participating securities that should be included in our computation of earnings per share under the
two-class method. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and
vested restricted stock awards outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of potential
future issuances of common stock relating to stock option programs and other potentially dilutive
securities using the treasury stock method. In calculating diluted EPS, the dilutive effect of
stock options is computed using the average market price for the respective period. In addition,
the assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method include the average unrecognized compensation
expense and assumed tax benefit of stock options that are in-the-money. This results in the
assumed buyback of additional shares, thereby reducing the dilutive impact of stock options.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online |
|
$ |
21,763 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
|
$ |
18,878 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
$ |
66,294 |
|
|
|
87 |
% |
|
$ |
58,065 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
Events |
|
|
4,129 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3,123 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
10,266 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10,052 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
25,892 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
22,001 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
76,560 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
68,117 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online |
|
|
5,547 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4,921 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
16,873 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
15,043 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Events |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,459 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
7,035 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
20,480 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
18,502 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
18,857 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
15,931 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
56,080 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
49,615 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and
marketing |
|
|
10,182 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
8,984 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
28,997 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
27,815 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Product development |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5,690 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6,623 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
General and
administrative |
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10,362 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11,671 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of
intangible assets |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses |
|
|
16,808 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
16,356 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
50,464 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
51,269 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
(loss) |
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
5,616 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Interest income, net |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before
provision for income
taxes |
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
5,648 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Provision for income
taxes |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
(612 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,706 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,506 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online |
|
$ |
21,763 |
|
|
$ |
18,878 |
|
|
$ |
2,885 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Events |
|
|
4,129 |
|
|
|
3,123 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
25,892 |
|
|
$ |
22,001 |
|
|
$ |
3,891 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online. The increase in online revenue was primarily attributable to a $2.0 million increase
in lead generation offerings, primarily due to an increase in sponsorship and white paper sales
volumes. Branding revenues also increased by $0.7 million, due primarily to an increase in banner
sales volume.
Events. The increase in events revenue is due to the timing of a major multi-day conference
held in the third quarter of 2011 that was held in the second quarter of 2010.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online |
|
$ |
5,547 |
|
|
$ |
4,921 |
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Events |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
$ |
7,035 |
|
|
$ |
6,070 |
|
|
$ |
965 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
18,857 |
|
|
$ |
15,931 |
|
|
$ |
2,926 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Online Revenues. The increase in cost of online revenues reflects the increase in
online revenues and was primarily attributable to a $0.3 million increase in payroll-related
expenses due to increased headcount, a $0.2 million increase in hosting and production costs,
primarily related to increased international partner activity, and a $0.1 million increase in
stock-based compensation.
Cost of Events Revenues. The increase in events cost of revenues is due to the cost of a
major multi-day conference held in the third quarter of 2011 that was held in the second quarter of
2010.
Gross Profit. Our gross profit is equal to the difference between our revenues and our cost
of revenues for the period. Gross profit for the third quarter of 2011 was 73% as compared to 72%
for the same period of 2010. The increase in online gross profit was $2.3 million, attributable to
the increase in online revenue offset by increases in hosting and production and compensation costs
as compared to the third quarter of 2010. Events gross profit increased by $0.6 million,
primarily as a result of the higher events revenues. Because the majority of our costs are
labor-related, we expect our gross profit to fluctuate from period to period depending on the total
revenues for the period, as well as the relative contribution of online and events revenues to our
total revenues.
25
Operating Expenses and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
$ |
10,182 |
|
|
$ |
8,984 |
|
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Product development |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
16,808 |
|
|
$ |
16,356 |
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
1,106 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
|
316 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and Marketing. The increase in selling and marketing expenses is primarily due to a
$1.2 million increase in compensation and related benefits costs due to increased headcount,
including hiring expenses and the use of temporary help during the recruitment process, and a $0.5
million increase in allocated facilities, travel and employee-related costs due primarily to
international expansion. These increases were offset in part by a $0.5 million decrease in
stock-based compensation due to the accelerated vesting of performance-based awards in 2010.
Product Development. The decrease in product development expense was primarily due to a
reduction in payroll related costs due to additional payroll related software costs being
capitalized.
General and Administrative. The decrease in general and administrative expense was primarily
attributable to a $0.4 million reduction in stock-based compensation, primarily due to the
accelerated vesting of performance-based awards in 2010, and a $0.2 million decrease in corporate
taxes due to a potential net worth tax liability recorded in the third quarter of 2010. These
decreases were offset in part by a $0.2 million increase in personnel-related costs, including
hiring expenses and the use of consultants during the recruitment process.
Certain amounts in the prior years financial statements have been reclassified to conform
with the current year presentation.
Depreciation and Amortization of Intangible Assets. The increase in depreciation expense is
related to our increased fixed asset base, primarily as a result of our continued investment in
internal-use software development costs and computer equipment. The decrease in amortization of
intangible assets expense was primarily attributable to certain intangible assets becoming fully
amortized during 2010, partially offset by amortization on newly acquired intangible assets.
Interest Income, Net. The decrease in interest income, net primarily reflects our lower cash
balances in the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010,
primarily resulting from the completed tender offer in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was 53% for the three months ended
September 30, 2011. The provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2010
included an adjustment of $0.1 million for an uncertain income tax position related to the
classification of TechTarget Securities Corporation as a Massachusetts security corporation. Our
effective tax rate excluding the adjustment was (47)% for that period. For the three months ended
September 30, 2011, we calculated the provision for income taxes using a forecasted tax rate for
the year ended December 31, 2011. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, due to net
operating losses, we calculated the provision for income taxes using a period-to-date approach.
Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online |
|
$ |
66,294 |
|
|
$ |
58,065 |
|
|
$ |
8,229 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Events |
|
|
10,266 |
|
|
|
10,052 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
76,560 |
|
|
$ |
68,117 |
|
|
$ |
8,443 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Online. The increase in online revenue was primarily attributable to a $6.5 million increase
in lead generation offerings, primarily due to an increase in sponsorship and white paper sales
volumes. Branding revenues also increased by $1.6 million, due primarily to an increase in banner
sales volume.
Events. The increase in events revenue is due to an additional multi-day conference held in
the second quarter, offset in part by a reduction in custom events and seminars as we continue to
focus on those events that we deem most profitable.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online |
|
$ |
16,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,043 |
|
|
$ |
1,830 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Events |
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
3,459 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
$ |
20,480 |
|
|
$ |
18,502 |
|
|
$ |
1,978 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
56,080 |
|
|
$ |
49,615 |
|
|
$ |
6,465 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Online Revenues. The increase in cost of online revenues was primarily attributable
to a $1.0 million increase in hosting and production costs, primarily related to increased
international partner activity and freelancer costs, and a $0.8 million increase in payroll-related
expenses due to increased headcount.
Cost of Events Revenues. Cost of events revenues increased in the first nine months of 2011
as compared to the same period a year ago, primarily due to costs related to a new multi-day
conference that was added in the second quarter of 2011.
Gross Profit. Our gross profit is equal to the difference between our revenues and our cost
of revenues for the period. Gross profit for the first nine months of both 2011 and 2010 was 73%.
Online gross profit increased $6.4 million, attributable to the increase in online revenue offset
by increases in hosting and production and compensation costs as compared to the first nine months
of 2010. Events gross profit was flat. Because the majority of our costs are labor-related, we
expect our gross profit to fluctuate from period to period depending on the total revenues for the
period, as well as the relative contribution of online and events revenues to our total revenues.
Operating Expenses and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
$ |
28,997 |
|
|
$ |
27,815 |
|
|
$ |
1,182 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Product development |
|
|
5,690 |
|
|
|
6,623 |
|
|
|
(933 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
10,362 |
|
|
|
11,671 |
|
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
50,464 |
|
|
$ |
51,269 |
|
|
$ |
(805 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
(238 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
2,942 |
|
|
$ |
1,122 |
|
|
$ |
1,820 |
|
|
|
162 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and Marketing. The increase in selling and marketing expenses is primarily due to a
$1.7 million increase in compensation and related benefits costs due to increased headcount,
including hiring expenses and the use of temporary help during the recruitment process, a $0.9
million increase in allocated facilities, travel and employee-related costs due primarily to
international expansion and, to a lesser extent, increased direct marketing and consulting costs.
These increases were offset in part by a $1.8 million decrease in stock-based compensation due
to the accelerated vesting of performance-based awards in 2010.
27
Product Development. The decrease in product development expense was primarily caused by a
$0.6 million reduction in payroll and allocated costs due to additional payroll related software
costs being capitalized, a $0.1 million reduction in consulting costs and a $0.1 million reduction
in stock-based compensation, primarily due to the accelerated vesting of performance-based awards
in 2010.
General and Administrative. The decrease in general and administrative expense was primarily
attributable to a $1.7 million reduction in stock-based compensation, primarily due to the
accelerated vesting of performance-based awards in the first nine months of 2010, a $0.5 million
decrease in audit and compliance fees and a $0.1 million decrease in corporate taxes due to a
potential net worth tax liability recorded in 2010. These decreases were offset in part by a $0.5
million increase in personnel-related costs, including hiring expenses and the use of consultants
during the recruitment process, a $0.2 million increase to our bad debt reserve and a $0.2 million
increase in legal fees, primarily related to acquisitions.
Certain amounts in the prior years financial statements have been reclassified to conform
with the current year presentation.
Restructuring Charge. The restructuring charge was for redundancy costs related to the
Computer Weekly acquisition.
Depreciation and Amortization of Intangible Assets. The increase in depreciation expense is
related to our increased fixed asset base, primarily as a result of our continued investment in
internal-use software development costs and computer equipment as well as leasehold improvements
associated with our move to the new corporate headquarters on March 1, 2010. The decrease in
amortization of intangible assets expense was primarily attributable to certain intangible assets
becoming fully amortized during 2010, partially offset by amortization on newly acquired intangible
assets.
Interest Income, Net. The decrease in interest income, net primarily reflects our lower cash
balances in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010
resulting from the completed tender offer in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was 52% and (81%) for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The provision for income taxes for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 includes a discrete tax expense of $65,000 related to a state tax
assessment for a prior period. Our effective tax rate excluding the discrete tax expense was 51%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The change in the effective tax rate excluding the
discrete tax expense was as a result of applying the provision of ASC 740, Income Taxes, as it
relates to interim periods. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we calculated the
provision for income taxes using a forecasted tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2011. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, due to net operating losses, we calculated the provision for
income taxes using a period-to-date approach.
Seasonality
The timing of our revenues is affected by seasonal factors. Our revenues are seasonal
primarily as a result of the annual budget approval process of many of our customers and the
historical decrease in advertising and events activity in summer months. Consequently, our fiscal
second and fourth quarters tend to have larger online revenue in relative terms when compared to
our fiscal first and third quarters. Events revenue may vary depending on which quarters we
produce the event, which may vary when compared to previous periods. The timing of revenues in
relation to our expenses, much of which does not vary directly with revenue, has an impact on the
cost of online revenues, selling and marketing, product development, and general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenue in each calendar quarter during the year.
The majority of our expenses are personnel-related and include salaries, stock-based
compensation, benefits and incentive-based compensation plan expenses. As a result, we have not
experienced significant seasonal fluctuations in the timing of our expenses period to period.
28
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Resources
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, investments, cash flow from operating
activities and available bank borrowings will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for
at least the next twelve months. Our
future working capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the operations of
our existing business, our potential strategic expansion internationally, future acquisitions we
might undertake, and the expansion into complementary businesses. To the extent that our cash and
cash equivalents and cash flow from operating activities are insufficient to fund our future
activities, we may need to raise additional funds through bank credit arrangements or public or
private equity or debt financings. We also may need to raise additional funds in the event we
determine in the future to effect one or more additional acquisitions of businesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
56,293 |
|
|
$ |
50,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
27,100 |
|
|
$ |
24,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
Our cash, cash equivalents and investments at September 30, 2011 were held for working capital
purposes and were invested primarily in money market accounts and municipal bonds. We do not enter
into investments for trading or speculative purposes. At September 30, 2011, we held long-term
investments of $9.8 million in instruments not exceeding maturities of eighteen months. Due to the
liquidation of investments in the fourth quarter of 2010 in connection with our tender offer, no
amounts were invested in long-term instruments at December 31, 2010.
Accounts Receivable, Net
Our accounts receivable balance fluctuates from period to period, which affects our cash flow
from operating activities. The fluctuations vary depending on the timing of our service delivery
and billing activity, cash collections, and changes to our allowance for doubtful accounts. We use
days sales outstanding, or DSO, as a measurement of the quality and status of our receivables. We
define DSO as net accounts receivable divided by total revenue for the applicable period,
multiplied by the number of days in the applicable period. DSO was 96 and 99 days for the quarters
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
10,572 |
|
|
$ |
8,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities(1) |
|
$ |
(5,645 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cash used in investing activities is shown net of investment activity of $(14.1)
million and $(0.7) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. |
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities primarily consists of net income adjusted for certain
non-cash items including depreciation and amortization, the provision for bad debt, stock-based
compensation, deferred income taxes, and the effect of changes in working capital and other
activities. Cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was
$10.6 million compared to $8.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in
cash provided by operating activities was primarily a result of an increase in net income of $2.7
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with a net loss of $2.5 million during
the same period in 2010, offset in part by a decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation from
$9.2 million in 2010 to $5.7 million in 2011 due to the accelerated vesting of performance-based
awards in 2010. Also contributing to the increase were a $2.5 million increase in accounts
receivable during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to an increase of $6.3 million
during the same period in 2010, offset in part by a decrease in other liabilities of $0.6 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to an increase of $1.9 million during that
period in 2010. The change in accounts receivable is primarily caused by an increase in unbilled
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 due
to the timing of annual billing cycles with some of our larger customers. The change in other
liabilities is caused by a reduction of our deferred rent balance, which had increased in 2010
after moving into our new corporate headquarters.
29
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net of
investment activity, was $3.6 million for the purchase of property and equipment made up primarily
of website development costs, computer equipment and related software and internal-use development
costs. Cash investment of $2.0 million was also made for the websites, product offerings and
events associated with Computer Weekly and its sister channel-targeted brand, MicroScope, from Reed
Business Information Limited in April 2011.
Equity Financing Activities
We received proceeds from the exercise of stock options in the amounts of $1.1 million and
$0.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Term Loan and Credit Facility Borrowings
In August 2006, we entered into a credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) with a commercial
bank, which included a $10.0 million term loan (the Term Loan) and a $20.0 million revolving
credit facility (the Revolving Credit Facility). The Credit Agreement was amended in August 2007,
in December 2008, in December 2009 and again in August 2011. The amendment in 2009 reduced the
Revolving Credit Facility to $5.0 million. We paid off the remaining balance of the Term Loan in
December 2009. The amendment in August 2011 extended the term of the facility and adjusted certain
other financial terms and covenants.
The Revolving Credit Facility matures on August 31, 2016. Unless earlier payment is required
by an event of default, all principal and unpaid interest will be due and payable on August 31,
2016. At our option, the Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at either the prime rate less
1.00% or the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus the applicable LIBOR margin. The
applicable LIBOR margin is based on the ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA for the preceding four
fiscal quarters. As of September 30, 2011, the applicable LIBOR margin, which was the operative
rate during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was 1.25%.
We are also required to pay an unused line fee on the daily unused amount of our Revolving
Credit Facility at a per annum rate based on the ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA for the
preceding four fiscal quarters. As of September 30, 2011, unused availability under the Revolving
Credit Facility totaled $3.5 million and the per annum unused line fee rate was 0.20%.
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 there was no amount outstanding under this
revolving loan agreement. There is a $1.5 million standby letter of credit related to our
corporate headquarters lease that is outstanding at September 30, 2011, bringing our available
borrowings on the $5.0 million facility to $3.5 million.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are collateralized by a security interest in
substantially all of our assets. Covenants governing the Credit Agreement include the maintenance
of certain financial ratios. At September 30, 2011 we were in compliance with all covenants under
the Credit Agreement.
Capital Expenditures
We have made capital expenditures primarily for computer equipment and related software needed
to host our websites, internal-use software development costs, as well as for leasehold
improvements and other general purposes to support our growth. Our capital expenditures totaled
$3.6 million and $4.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
A majority of our capital expenditures in the first nine months of 2011 were internal-use
development costs and, to a lesser extent, computer equipment and related software. A majority of
our capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2010 were leasehold improvements for our new
corporate headquarters, which we occupied beginning on March 1, 2010, as well as website
development costs, computer equipment and related software, and internal-use development costs. We
are not currently party to any purchase contracts related to future capital expenditures.
30
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
As of September 30, 2011, our principal commitments consist of obligations under leases for
office space. The
offices are leased under noncancelable operating lease agreements that expire through February
2020. The following table sets forth our commitments to settle contractual obligations in cash as
of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1 - 3 Years |
|
|
3 - 5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
28,604 |
|
|
$ |
4,155 |
|
|
$ |
6,505 |
|
|
$ |
6,436 |
|
|
$ |
11,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2011, we had an irrevocable standby letter of credit outstanding in the
aggregate amount of $1.5 million. This letter of credit supports the lease we entered into in 2009
for our corporate headquarters. This letter of credit, subject to certain reductions, extends
annually through February 28, 2020 unless notification of termination is received.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for recent accounting
pronouncements that could have an effect on us.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse
changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily a result of
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. We do not hold or issue financial
instruments for trading purposes.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Our subsidiary, TechTarget Limited, was established in July 2006 and is located in London,
England. In August 2010, our Hong Kong subsidiary, TechTarget (HK) Limited, was formed in order to
facilitate our activities in Asia-Pac. We also have a branch office in India and a VIE in Beijing,
China. As of September 30, 2011, most of our international agreements have been denominated in
U.S. dollars and aggregate foreign currency payments made by us through these entities have not
been significant. We currently believe our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
is financially immaterial and therefore have not entered into foreign currency hedging
transactions. We continue to review this issue and may consider hedging certain foreign exchange
risks through the use of currency futures or options in the future.
Interest Rate Risk
At September 30, 2011, we had cash, cash equivalents and investments totaling $56.3 million.
These amounts were invested primarily in money market accounts and municipal bonds. The cash, cash
equivalents and investments were held for working capital purposes. We do not enter into
investments for trading or speculative purposes. Due to the short-term nature of these investments,
we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment
portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates. Declines in interest rates, however, would
reduce future investment income.
Our exposure to market risk also relates to the amount of interest expense we must pay under
our revolving credit facility. The advances under this credit facility bear a variable rate of
interest determined as a function of the lenders prime rate or LIBOR. At September 30, 2011, there
were no amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
31
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
The Company is required to maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of the Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010,
management, under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
conducted an evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, and due to
the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described in Changes in
Internal Control over Financial Reporting below, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the
reasonable assurance level. To date, the material weakness identified in the 2010 Form 10-K has not
been fully remediated. As a result, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
continue to conclude that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of
the filing date of this Form 10-Q.
As disclosed in the 2010 Form 10-K, management identified the following material weakness in
connection with its assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2010:
Inadequate and ineffective accounting and reporting system for processing and reporting of
certain complex service revenue transactions.
Remediation Plans
Management has identified the following measures to strengthen our internal control over
financial reporting and to address the material weakness identified above. We believe that these
planned actions will adequately address the material weakness.
In order to ensure that the Companys accounting and reporting systems are adequate to carry
out the level and complexities associated with our service revenue transactions, we have initiated
and continue to:
Evaluate the effectiveness of the software application implemented in 2010 and make
improvements to its role in providing control over revenue transactions until we are able to
implement a new fully integrated financial accounting and reporting platform containing adequate
system level controls to support an appropriate control environment. Additionally, a
cross-functional committee has been convened to review the current processes and systems and to
make detailed recommendations for improvement. Such recommendations will be reviewed by the
Companys executive team, and are expected to include short-term upgrades to the existing financial
system as well as longer ranging initiatives that could include full replacement of the existing
system.
Enhance other control activities to further mitigate process risks not addressed by the
current accounting and reporting systems. These enhancements include the periodic review of system
exception reports, as well as the use of analytic procedures to increase the effectiveness of the
account reconciliation process.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Except for changes in connection with the remediation plan subsequent to December 31, 2010 of
the material weakness described above, there were no changes in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over
financial reporting.
32
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We are not currently a party to any material litigation, and we are not aware of any pending
or threatened litigation against us that could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results or financial condition.
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should
carefully consider the factors discussed under the heading, Risk Factors in our Annual Report
filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. These are risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the
forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Because of these
factors, as well as other variables affecting our operating results, past financial performance
should not be considered as a reliable indicator of future performance and investors should not use
historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods. These risks are not the only
ones facing us.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Because we depend on our ability to generate revenues from the sale of advertising, fluctuations in
advertising spending could have an adverse effect on our operating results.
The primary source of our revenues is the sale of advertising to our customers. Our
advertising revenues accounted for approximately 99% of our total revenues for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011. We believe that advertising spending on the Internet, as in traditional
media, fluctuates significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of
our control. These factors include:
|
|
|
variations in expenditures by advertisers due to budgetary constraints; |
|
|
|
the cancellation or delay of projects by advertisers; |
|
|
|
the cyclical and discretionary nature of advertising spending; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions, as well as economic conditions specific to the
Internet and online and offline media industry; and |
|
|
|
the occurrence of extraordinary events, such as natural disasters,
international or domestic terrorist attacks or armed conflict. |
Because all of our customers are in the IT industry, our revenues are subject to characteristics of
the IT industry that can affect advertising spending by IT vendors.
The IT industry is characterized by, among other things, volatile quarterly results, uneven
sales patterns, short product life cycles, rapid technological developments and frequent new
product introductions and enhancements. As a result, our customers advertising budgets, which are
often viewed as discretionary expenditures, may increase or decrease significantly over a short
period of time. In addition, the advertising budgets of our customers may fluctuate as a result of:
|
|
|
weakness in corporate IT spending resulting in a decline in IT advertising
spending; |
|
|
|
increased concentration in the IT industry as a result of consolidations,
leading to a decrease in the number of current and prospective customers, as well as an
overall reduction in advertising; |
|
|
|
reduced spending by combined entities following such consolidations; |
|
|
|
the timing of advertising campaigns around new product introductions and
initiatives; and |
|
|
|
economic conditions specific to the IT industry. |
The continuing general economic, business or industry conditions may continue to adversely affect
the business of the Company, as well as our ability to forecast financial results.
The domestic and international economies continue to experience ongoing instability and
inconsistent, unpredictable growth. This period of instability has been magnified by factors
including changes in the availability of credit, decreased business and consumer confidence and
continuing high unemployment. These and other macro-economic conditions have contributed to
increased volatility and diminished expectations for the global economy and expectations of future
global economic growth. If the economic climate in the U.S. and abroad does not improve or
deteriorates, our customers or potential customers could reduce or delay their purchases of our
offerings, which would adversely impact our revenues and our ability to sell our offerings, collect
customer
33
receivables
and, ultimately, our profitability. Additionally, future economic conditions currently continue to have a high
degree of inherent uncertainty. As a result, it continues to be difficult to estimate the level of
growth or contraction for the economy as a whole, as well as for the various sectors of the
economy, such as the IT market. Because all components of our budgeting and forecasting are
dependent upon estimates of growth or contraction in the IT market and demand for our offerings,
the prevailing economic uncertainties continue to render accurate estimates of future income and
expenditures very difficult to make. We cannot predict the effect or duration of current economic
conditions or the duration or strength of an economic recovery, worldwide or in the IT industry.
Further adverse changes may occur as a result of soft global, domestic or regional economic
conditions, wavering consumer confidence, unemployment, declines in stock markets, or other factors
affecting economic conditions generally. These changes may negatively affect the sales of our
offerings, increase exposure to losses from bad debts, increase the cost and decrease the
availability of financing, or increase the risk of loss on investments.
Lingering effects of financial market instability and continued uncertain conditions in the United
States and global economies have in the past and could in the future adversely affect our revenues
and operating results.
We believe that the lingering effects of the instability affecting the financial markets and a
further deterioration in the current business climate within the United States and/or certain other
geographic regions in which we do business have had, and could continue to have, a negative impact
on our revenue and operating results. Because all of our clients are in the IT industry, the
success of our business is intrinsically linked to the health, and subject to market conditions, of
the IT industry, and regional, domestic and global economic conditions. In turn, many of our
customers have reassessed and will, for the foreseeable future, be likely to continue to scrutinize
their spending on advertising campaigns. Prior market downturns in the IT industry have resulted in
declines in advertising spending, which can cause longer sales cycles, deferral or delay of
purchases by IT vendors and generally reduced expenditures for advertising and related services.
Our revenues and profitability depend on the overall demand for advertising services from our
customers. We believe that demand for our offerings has been in the past, and could be in the
future, disproportionately affected by fluctuations, disruptions, instability or downturns in the
economy and the IT industry, which may cause customers and potential customers to exit the industry
or delay, cancel or reduce any planned expenditures for our advertising offerings. Furthermore,
competitors may respond to market conditions by lowering prices and attempting to lure away our
customers and prospects to lower cost offerings. In addition, the slowdown in the formation of new
IT companies, and the decline in the growth of existing IT companies, may continue to cause a
decline in demand for our offerings.
Our quarterly operating results are subject to fluctuations, and these fluctuations may adversely
affect the trading price of our common stock.
We have experienced and expect to continue to experience fluctuations in our quarterly
revenues and operating results. Our quarterly revenues and operating results may fluctuate from
quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control. In
addition to the factors described elsewhere in this Risk Factors section, these factors include:
|
|
|
the spending priorities and advertising budget cycles of specific advertisers; |
|
|
|
the addition or loss of advertisers; |
|
|
|
the addition of new sites and services by us or our competitors; and |
|
|
|
seasonal fluctuations in advertising spending. |
Due to such risks, you should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of
operations as an indicator of our future results. Due to the foregoing factors, it is also possible
that our results of operations in one or more quarters may fall below the expectations of investors
and/or securities analysts. In such an event, the trading price of our common stock is likely to
decline.
Our revenues are primarily derived from short-term contracts that may not be renewed.
The primary source of our revenues is the sale of advertising to our customers, and we expect
that this will continue to be the case for the foreseeable future. Our advertising contracts are
primarily short-term, typically less than 6 months, and are generally subject to termination
without substantial penalty by the customer at any time, generally with minimal notice
requirements. We cannot assure you that our current customers will fulfill their obligations under
their existing contracts, continue to participate in our existing programs beyond the terms of
their existing contracts or enter into any additional contracts for new programs that we offer. If
a significant number of advertisers or a few large advertisers decided not to continue advertising
on our websites or conducting or sponsoring events, we could experience a rapid decline in our
revenues over a relatively short period of time.
34
If we are unable to deliver content and services that attract and retain users, our ability to
attract advertisers may be affected, which could in turn have an adverse affect on our revenues.
Our future success depends on our continued ability to deliver original and compelling content
and services to attract and retain users. Our user base is comprised of corporate IT professionals
who demand specialized websites and events tailored to the sectors of the IT products for which
they are responsible and that they purchase. Our content and services may not be attractive to a
sufficient number of users to attract advertisers and generate revenues consistent with our
estimates. We also may not develop new content or services in a timely or cost-effective manner.
Our ability to develop and produce this specialized content successfully is subject to numerous
uncertainties, including our ability to:
|
|
|
anticipate and respond successfully to rapidly changing IT developments and
preferences to ensure that our content remains timely and interesting to our users; |
|
|
|
attract and retain qualified editors, writers and technical personnel; |
|
|
|
fund new development for our programs and other offerings; |
|
|
|
successfully expand our content offerings into new platform and delivery
mechanisms; and |
|
|
|
promote and strengthen the brands of our websites and our name. |
If we are not successful in maintaining and growing our user base, our ability to retain and
attract advertisers may be affected, which could in turn have an adverse affect on our revenues.
Our inability to sustain our historical advertising rates could adversely affect our operating
results.
The market for advertising has fluctuated over the past few years. If we are unable to
maintain historical pricing levels for advertising on our websites and for sponsorships at our
events, our revenues could be adversely affected.
Competition for advertisers is intense, and we may not compete successfully, which could result in
a material reduction in our market share, the number of our advertisers and our revenues.
We compete for potential advertisers with a number of different types of offerings and
companies, including: broad-based media outlets, such as television, newspapers and business
periodicals that are designed to reach a wide audience; general purpose portals and search engines;
and offline and online offerings of media companies that produce content specifically for IT
professionals, including International Data Group, United Business Media, QuinStreet, CNet and Ziff
Davis Enterprise. Advertisers may choose our competitors over us not only because they prefer our
competitors online and events offerings to ours, but also because advertisers prefer to utilize
other forms of advertising offered by our competitors that are not offered by us and/or to
diversify their advertising expenditures. Although less than 9% of our revenues for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 were derived from advertisers located outside of North America, as we
continue to expand internationally, as we did in 2008 by commencing operations of our own websites
in the United Kingdom, in 2009 in India and Spain, in 2010 operating in both China and Australia
and, most recently by acquiring the Computer Weekly and MicroScope properties from Reed Business
Information Limited in the UK in April 2011, we expect to compete with many of the competitors
mentioned above, as well as with established media companies based in particular countries or
geographical regions. Many of these foreign-based media companies will be larger than we are and
will have established relationships with local advertisers. Many of our current and potential
competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition and
significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have. As a result, we could
lose market share to our competitors in one or more of our businesses and our revenues could
decline.
We depend upon Internet search engines to attract a significant portion of the users who visit our
websites, and if we were listed less prominently in search result listings, our business and
operating results would be harmed.
We derive a significant portion of our website traffic from users who search for IT purchasing
content through Internet search engines, such as Google, MSN, Bing and Yahoo! A critical factor in
attracting users to our websites is whether we are prominently displayed in response to an Internet
search relating to IT content. Search result listings are determined and displayed in accordance
with a set of formulas or algorithms developed by the particular Internet search engine. The
algorithms determine the order of the listing of results in response to the users Internet search.
From time to time, search engines revise their algorithms. In some instances, these modifications
may cause our websites to be listed less prominently in unpaid search results, which will result in
decreased traffic from search engine users to our websites. Our websites may also become listed
less prominently in unpaid search results for other reasons, such as search engine technical
difficulties, search engine technical changes and changes we make to our websites. In addition,
search engines have deemed the practices of some companies to be inconsistent with search engine
guidelines and have decided not to list their websites in search result listings at all. If we are
listed less prominently or not at all in search result listings for any reason, the traffic to our
websites likely will decline, which could harm our operating results. If we decide to attempt
to replace this traffic, we may be required to increase our marketing expenditures, which also
could harm our operating results.
35
We may not innovate at a successful pace, which could harm our operating results.
Our industry is rapidly adopting new technologies and standards to create and satisfy the
demands of users and advertisers. It is critical that we continue to innovate by anticipating and
adapting to these changes to ensure that our content-delivery platforms and services remain
effective and interesting to our users, advertisers and partners. In addition, we may discover that
we must make significant expenditures to achieve these goals. If we fail to accomplish these goals,
we may lose users and the advertisers that seek to reach those users, which could harm our
operating results.
We may be unable to continue to build awareness of our brands, which could negatively impact our
business and cause our revenues to decline.
Building and maintaining recognition of our brands is critical to attracting and expanding our
online user base and attendance at our events. We intend to continue to build existing brands and
introduce new brands that will resonate with our targeted audiences, but we may not be successful.
In order to promote these brands, in response to competitive pressures or otherwise, we may find it
necessary to increase our marketing budget, hire additional marketing and public relations
personnel or otherwise increase our financial commitment to creating and maintaining brand loyalty
among our clients. If we fail to promote and maintain our brands effectively, or incur excessive
expenses attempting to promote and maintain our brands, our business and financial results may
suffer.
Given the tenure and experience of our Chief Executive Officer and President, and their guiding
roles in developing our business and growth strategy since our inception, our growth may be
inhibited or our operations may be impaired if we were to lose the services of either of them.
Our growth and success depends to a significant extent on our ability to retain Greg
Strakosch, our Chief Executive Officer, and Don Hawk, our President, who co-founded the company and
have developed, engineered and stewarded the growth and operation of our business since its
inception. The loss of the services of either of these persons could inhibit our growth or impair
our operations and cause our stock price to decline.
We may not be able to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel cost-effectively, which could
impact the quality of our content and services and the effectiveness and efficiency of our
management, resulting in increased costs and losses in revenues.
Our success depends on our ability to attract, hire and retain at commercially reasonable
rates qualified technical, editorial, sales and marketing, customer support, financial and
accounting and other managerial personnel. The competition for personnel in the industries in which
we operate is intense. Our personnel may terminate their employment at any time for any reason.
Loss of personnel may also result in increased costs for replacement hiring and training. If we
fail to attract and hire new personnel or retain and motivate our current personnel, we may not be
able to operate our businesses effectively or efficiently, serve our customers properly or maintain
the quality of our content and services. In particular, our success depends in significant part on
maintaining and growing an effective sales force. This dependence involves a number of challenges,
including:
|
|
|
the need to hire, integrate, motivate and retain additional sales and sales
support personnel; |
|
|
|
the need to train new sales personnel, many of whom lack sales experience when
they are hired; and |
|
|
|
competition from other companies in hiring and retaining sales personnel. |
We may fail to identify or successfully acquire and integrate businesses, products and technologies
that would otherwise enhance our service offerings to our customers and users, and as a result our
revenues may decline or fail to grow.
We have acquired, and in the future may acquire or invest in, complementary businesses,
products or technologies. Acquisitions and investments involve numerous risks including:
|
|
|
difficulty in assimilating the operations and personnel of acquired businesses; |
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing businesses and distraction of our
management and the management of acquired companies; |
|
|
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into our offerings
and services; |
|
|
|
unanticipated expenses related to technology and other integration; |
|
|
|
potential failure to achieve additional sales and enhance our customer bases
through cross marketing of the combined companys services to new and existing
customers; |
|
|
|
potential detrimental impact to our pricing based on the historical pricing of
any acquired business with common clients and the market generally; |
|
|
|
potential litigation resulting from our business combinations or acquisition
activities; and |
|
|
|
potential unknown liabilities associated with the acquired businesses. |
36
Our inability to integrate any acquired business successfully, or the failure to achieve any
expected synergies, could result in increased expenses and a reduction in expected revenues or
revenue growth. As a result, our stock price could fluctuate or decline. In addition, we cannot
assure you that we will be successful in expanding into complementary sectors in the future, which
could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
The costs associated with potential acquisitions or strategic partnerships could dilute your
investment or adversely affect our results of operations.
In order to finance acquisitions, investments or strategic partnerships, we may use equity
securities, debt, cash, or a combination of the foregoing. Any issuance of equity securities or
securities convertible into equity may result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders,
reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Any debt financing is likely to have
financial and other covenants that could have an adverse impact on our business if we do not
achieve our projected results. In addition, the related increases in expenses could adversely
affect our results of operations.
We have limited protection of our intellectual property and could be subject to infringement claims
that may result in costly litigation, the payment of damages or the need to revise the way we
conduct our business.
Our success and ability to compete are dependent in part on the strength of our proprietary
rights, on the goodwill associated with our trademarks, trade names and service marks, and on our
ability to use U.S. and foreign laws to protect them. Our intellectual property includes, among
other things, our original content, our editorial features, logos, brands, domain names, the
technology that we use to deliver our services, the various databases of information that we
maintain and make available by license, and the appearances of our websites. We claim common law
protection on certain names and marks that we have used in connection with our business activities.
Although we have applied for and obtained registration of some of our marks in countries outside of
the United States where we do business, we have not been able to obtain registration of all of our
key marks in such jurisdictions, in some cases due to prior registration or use by third parties
employing similar marks. In addition to U.S. and foreign laws, we rely on confidentiality
agreements with our employees and third parties and protective contractual provisions to safeguard
our intellectual property. Policing our intellectual property rights worldwide is a difficult task,
and we may not be able to identify infringing users. We cannot be certain that third party
licensees of our content will always take actions to protect the value of our proprietary rights
and reputation. Intellectual property laws and our agreements may not be sufficient to prevent
others from copying or otherwise obtaining and using our content or technologies. In addition,
others may develop non-infringing technologies that are similar or superior to ours. In seeking to
protect our marks, copyrights, domain names and other proprietary rights, or in defending ourselves
against claims of infringement that may be with or without merit, we could face costly litigation
and the diversion of our managements attention and resources. These claims could result in the
need to develop alternative trademarks, content or technology or to enter into costly royalty or
licensing agreements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition. We may not have, in all cases, conducted formal evaluations to
confirm that our technology and services do not or will not infringe upon the intellectual property
rights of third parties. As a result, we cannot be certain that our technology, offerings, services
or online content do not or will not infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third
parties. If we were found to have infringed on a third partys intellectual property rights, the
value of our brands and our business reputation could be impaired, and our business could suffer.
Our business could be harmed if we are unable to correspond with existing and potential users by
e-mail.
We use e-mail as a significant means of communicating with our existing users. The laws and
regulations governing the use of e-mail for marketing purposes continue to evolve, and the growth
and development of the market for commerce over the Internet may lead to the adoption of additional
legislation and/or changes to existing laws. If new laws or regulations are adopted, or existing
laws and regulations are interpreted and/or amended or modified, to impose additional restrictions
on our ability to send e-mail to our users or potential users, we may not be able to communicate
with them in a cost-effective manner. In addition to legal restrictions on the use of e-mail,
Internet service providers and others typically attempt to block the transmission of unsolicited
e-mail, commonly known as spam. If an Internet service provider or software program identifies
e-mail from us as spam, we could be placed on a restricted list that would block our e-mail to
users or potential users who maintain e-mail accounts with these Internet service providers or who
use these software programs. If we are unable to communicate by e-mail with our users and potential
users as a result of legislation, blockage or otherwise, our business, operating results and
financial condition could be harmed.
37
Changes in laws and standards relating to data collection and use, and the privacy of Internet
users and other data could impair our efforts to maintain and grow our audience and thereby
decrease our advertising revenue.
We collect information from our users who register on our websites or for services, or respond
to surveys. Subject to each users permission (or right to decline, which we refer to as an
opt-out, a practice that may differ based on the applicable regulatory requirements of different
countries laws), we may use this information to inform our users of services that they have
indicated may be of interest to them. We may also share this information with our advertising
clients for registered members who have elected to receive additional promotional materials and
have granted us permission to share their information with third parties. We also collect
information on our registered members and users based on their activity on our sites. The U.S.
federal and various state governments have adopted or proposed limitations on the collection,
distribution and use of personal information of Internet users. Additionally, several foreign
jurisdictions, including the European Union, the United Kingdom and Canada, have adopted
legislation (including directives or regulations) that may increase the requirements for
collecting, or limit our collection and use of, information from Internet users in these
jurisdictions. In addition, growing public concern about privacy, data security and the collection,
distribution and use of personal information has led to self-regulation of these practices by the
Internet advertising and direct marketing industry, and to increased federal and state regulation.
Because many of the proposed laws or regulations are in their early stages, we cannot yet determine
the impact these regulations may have on our business over time. Although, to date, our efforts to
comply with applicable federal and state laws and regulations have not hurt our business,
additional, more burdensome laws or regulations, including more restrictive consumer privacy and
data security laws, could be enacted or applied to us or our customers. Such laws or regulations
could impair our ability to collect user information that helps us to provide more targeted
advertising to our users and detailed lead data to our advertising clients, thereby impairing our
ability to maintain and grow our audience and maximize advertising revenue from our clients.
Additionally, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the FTC) and many state attorneys general are
applying federal and state consumer protection laws to require that the online collection, use and
dissemination of data, and the presentation of Web site content, comply with certain standards for
notice, choice, security and access. Courts may also adopt these developing standards. In many
cases, the specific limitations imposed by these standards are subject to interpretation by courts
and other governmental authorities. In addition, on December 20, 2007, the FTC published for public
comment proposed principles to address consumer privacy issues that may arise from so-called
behavioral targeting (i.e. the tracking of a users online activities in order to deliver
advertising tailored to his or her interests) and to encourage industry self-regulation. On
February 12, 2009, following public comment, the FTC released a Staff Report with its revised
principles for self-regulation of behavioral targeting. Although the FTC currently appears to be
less concerned with first-party behavioral and contextual advertising (each being the type of
behavioral targeting activities in which we are currently primarily engaged) than other types of
behavioral targeting that include the storage of more potentially sensitive, data or that collects
information outside of the traditional Web site context (such as through a mobile device or by an
ISP), the FTC has stated that it will continue to evaluate self-regulatory programs. Further,
through preliminary staff reports published in October and December, 2010, the FTC indicated that
it is considering regulations regarding behavioral targeting which may include implementation of a
more rigorous opt-in regime. An opt-in policy would prohibit businesses from collecting and using
information obtained through behavioral targeting activities from individuals who have not
voluntarily consented. Among other things, the implementation of an opt-in regime could require
substantial technical support and negatively impact the market for our services. Prompted by the
FTC reports, several legislators have introduced various online consumer privacy bills that would
provide the FTC with the rulemaking authority it currently lacks to establish standards for an
online mechanism to prohibit the collection of certain information. Additionally, Senators John
McCain (R-Az.) and John Kerry (D-Mass.) introduced a Commercial Privacy Bill of Rights on April
12, 2011, creating an online privacy bill of rights, which will require companies to seek an
individuals permission to collect sensitive personally identifiable information. The bill also
requires that companies allow individuals to opt-out of unauthorized use of covered information. A
few states have also introduced legislation that, if enacted, would restrict or prohibit behavioral
advertising within the state. In the absence of a federal law pre-empting their enforcement, such
state legislation would likely have the practical effect of regulating behavioral advertising
nationwide because of the difficulties behind implementing state-specific policies or identifying
the location of a particular user. In the event of additional legislation in this area, our ability
to effectively target our users may be limited. We believe that we are in compliance with
applicable consumer protection laws that apply to us, but a determination by a state or federal
agency or court that any of our practices do not meet these regulations could create liability to
us, result in adverse publicity and affect negatively our businesses. New interpretations of these
standards could also require us to incur additional costs and restrict our business operations. In
addition, several foreign governmental bodies, including the European Union, the United Kingdom and
Canada have regulations dealing with the collection and use of personal information obtained from
their citizens, some of which we have become subject to as a result of the expansion of our
business internationally. Regulations in these territories have focused on the collection, use,
disclosure and security of information that may be used to identify or that actually identifies an
individual, such as an email address or a name. Further, within the European Union, certain member
state data protection authorities regard IP addresses as personal information, and legislation
adopted recently in the European Union requires informed consent for the placement of a cookie on a
user device. We believe that we are in material compliance with such regulations as
applicable to us, however, such regulations and laws may be modified and new laws may be
enacted in the future. Any such developments (or developments stemming from enactment or
modification of other laws) or the failure to anticipate accurately the application or
interpretation of these laws could create liability to us, result in adverse publicity and affect
negatively our businesses.
38
U.S. and European lawmakers and regulators recently have expressed concern over the use of
third party cookies or web beacons for the purpose of online behavioral advertising and efforts to
address these uses may result in broader requirements that would apply to research activities,
including understanding our users Internet usage. Such actions may have a chilling effect on
businesses that collect or use online usage information generally or substantially increase the
cost of maintaining a business that collects or uses online usage information, increase regulatory
scrutiny and increase the potential of class action lawsuits. In response to marketplace concerns
about the usage of third party cookies and web beacons to track user behaviors, the major browsers
have enabled features that allow the user to limit the collection of certain data. These
developments could impair our ability to collect user information that helps us provide more
targeted advertising to our users. Microsofts Internet Explorer 9 contains a tracking protection
device that allows users to create lists of websites with which they do not wish to share personal
information. If a user lists our websites in a no-tracking list, we will not be able to collect
online activity data about the user. Internet Explorer 9 also includes Do Not Track headers, which
allow users to configure their browsers to send a header to every website that transmits a users
preferences not to be tracked. Mozillas Firefox 4 web browser contains a similar Do Not Track
mechanism. Googles Chrome browser also allows users to opt-out of ad-tracking cookies. In the
event users implement these developments, they have the potential to negatively affect our
business.
Increased exposure from loss of personal information could impose significant additional costs on
us.
Many states in which we operate have enacted regulations requiring us to notify customers in
the event that certain customer information is accessed, or believed to have been accessed, without
authorization and in some cases also develop proscriptive policies to protect against such
unauthorized access. Such notifications can result in private causes of action being filed against
us. Additionally, increasing regulatory demands are requiring us to provide protection of personal
information to prevent identity theft. Should we experience a loss of protected data, efforts to
regain compliance and address penalties imposed by such regulatory regimes could increase our
costs.
There are a number of risks associated with expansion of our business internationally that could
adversely affect our business.
We have license and other arrangements in various countries, and maintain direct presences in
the United Kingdom and India, as well as operations in China and Australia. In addition to facing
many of the same challenges we face domestically, there are additional risks and costs inherent in
expanding our business in international markets, including:
|
|
|
limitations on our activities in foreign countries where we have granted rights
to existing business partners; |
|
|
|
the adaptation of our websites and advertising programs to meet local needs and
to comply with local legal regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
varied, unfamiliar and unclear legal and regulatory restrictions, as well as
unforeseen changes in, legal and regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
more restrictive data protection regulation, which may vary by country; |
|
|
|
|
more extensive labor regulation, which may vary by country; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing multinational operations; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in finding appropriate foreign licensees or joint venture partners; |
|
|
|
|
distance, language and cultural differences in doing business with foreign entities; |
|
|
|
|
foreign political and economic uncertainty; |
|
|
|
less extensive adoption of the Internet as an information source and increased
restriction on the content of websites; |
|
|
|
currency exchange-rate fluctuations; and |
|
|
|
potential adverse tax requirements. |
As a result, we may face difficulties and unforeseen expenses in expanding our business
internationally and, even if we attempt to do so, we may be unsuccessful, which could harm our
business, operating results and financial condition.
39
There are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of the laws
and regulations of the Peoples Republic of China, or PRC, including, but not limited to, the laws
and regulations governing our business in the PRC, and the enforcement and performance of the
contractual arrangements between our wholly-owned subsidiary, TechTarget (HK) Limited, or TTGT HK,
and our affiliated Chinese entity, Keji Wangtuo (Beijing) Information
Technology Co., Ltd, or Keji Wangtuo, and its shareholders. The Company and TTGT HK are
considered foreign persons under PRC law. As a result, the Company and TTGT HK are subject to PRC
law limitations on foreign ownership of companies engaged in value-added telecommunications
services, including internet-related services, and advertising. Accordingly, we operate our
websites and our online advertising business in China through Keji Wangtuo, a company wholly-owned
by two citizens of the PRC; we have no equity ownership interest in Keji Wangtuo. Keji Wangtuo
holds the licenses and approvals necessary to operate our websites and online advertising business
in China. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, TTGT HK, we have contractual arrangements with Keji
Wangtuo and its shareholders that allow us to substantially control and operate Keji Wangtuo, and
give us the economic benefit of those operations. We cannot be sure that we will be able to enforce
these contracts. In addition, such contractual arrangements may not prove as effective in
exercising control over Keji Wangtuo as direct ownership. Although we believe we are in compliance
with current PRC regulations, we cannot be sure that the Chinese government would agree that our
operating and equity arrangements with Keiji Wangtuo comply with Chinese law. If the Chinese
government determines that we are not in compliance with applicable law, it could revoke our
business and operating licenses, require us to discontinue or restrict our operations, restrict our
right to collect revenues, block our websites in China, require us to restructure our Chinese
operations, impose additional conditions or requirements with which we may not be able to comply,
impose restrictions on our business operations or on our customers, or take other regulatory or
enforcement actions against us that could be harmful to our business in China.
Changes in regulations could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
It is possible that new laws and regulations or new interpretations of existing laws and
regulations in the United States and elsewhere will be adopted covering issues affecting our
business, including:
|
|
|
privacy, data security and use of personally identifiable information; |
|
|
|
copyrights, trademarks and domain names; and |
|
|
|
marketing practices such as behavioral advertising, e-mail or direct marketing. |
Increased government regulation, or the application of existing laws to online activities,
could:
|
|
|
decrease the growth rate of the Internet; |
|
|
|
increase our operating expenses; or |
|
|
|
expose us to significant liabilities. |
Furthermore, the relationship between regulations governing domain names and laws protecting
trademarks and similar proprietary rights is still evolving. Therefore, we might be unable to
prevent third parties from acquiring domain names that infringe or otherwise decrease the value of
our trademarks and other proprietary rights. Any impairment in the value of these important assets
could cause our stock price to decline. We cannot be sure what effect any future material
noncompliance by us with these laws and regulations or any material changes in these laws and
regulations could have on our business, operating results and financial condition.
As a creator and a distributor of content over the Internet, we face potential liability for legal
claims based on the nature and content of the materials that we create or distribute.
Due to the nature of content published on our online network, including content placed on our
online network by third parties, and as a creator and distributor of original content and research,
we face potential liability based on a variety of theories, including defamation, negligence,
copyright or trademark infringement, or other legal theories based on the nature, creation or
distribution of this information. Such claims may also include, among others, claims that by
providing hypertext links to websites operated by third parties, we are liable for wrongful actions
by those third parties through these websites. Similar claims have been brought, and sometimes
successfully asserted, against online services. It is also possible that our users could make
claims against us for losses incurred in reliance on information provided on our networks. In
addition, we could be exposed to liability in connection with material posted to our Internet sites
by third parties. For example, many of our sites offer users an opportunity to post unmoderated
comments and opinions. Some of this user-generated content may infringe on third party intellectual
property rights or privacy rights or may otherwise be subject to challenge under copyright laws.
Such claims, whether brought in the United States or abroad, could divert management time and
attention away from our business and result in significant cost to investigate and defend,
regardless of the merit of these claims. In addition, if we become subject to these types of claims
and are not successful in our defense, we may be forced to pay substantial damages. Our insurance
may not adequately protect us against these claims. The filing of these claims may also damage our
reputation as a high quality provider of unbiased, timely analysis and result in client
cancellations or overall decreased demand for our services.
We may be liable if third parties or our employees misappropriate our users confidential business
information.
We currently retain confidential information relating to our users in secure database servers.
Although we observe security measures throughout our operations, we cannot assure you that we will
be able to prevent individuals from gaining unauthorized access to these database servers. Any
unauthorized access to our servers, or abuse by our employees, could result in the theft of
confidential user information. If confidential information is compromised, we could lose customers
or become subject to liability or litigation and our reputation could be harmed, any of which could
materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
40
Our business, which is dependent on centrally located communications and computer hardware systems,
is vulnerable to natural disasters, telecommunication and systems failures, terrorism and other
problems, which could reduce traffic on our networks or websites and result in decreased capacity
for advertising space.
Our operations are dependent on our communications systems and computer hardware, all of which
are located in data centers operated by third parties. These systems could be damaged by fire,
floods, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunication failures and similar events. Our insurance
policies have limited coverage levels for loss or damages in these events and may not adequately
compensate us for any losses that may occur. In addition, terrorist acts or acts of war may cause
harm to our employees or damage our facilities, our clients, our clients customers and vendors, or
cause us to postpone or cancel, or result in dramatically reduced attendance at, our events, which
could adversely impact our revenues, costs and expenses and financial position. We are
predominantly uninsured for losses and interruptions to our systems or cancellations of events
caused by terrorist acts and acts of war.
Our systems may be subject to slower response times and system disruptions that could adversely
affect our revenues.
Our ability to attract and maintain relationships with users, advertisers and strategic
partners will depend on the satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our Internet
infrastructure. Our Internet advertising revenues relate directly to the number of advertisements
and other marketing opportunities delivered to our users. System interruptions or delays that
result in the unavailability of Internet sites or slower response times for users would reduce the
number of advertising impressions and leads delivered. This could reduce our revenues as the
attractiveness of our sites to users and advertisers decreases. Our insurance policies provide only
limited coverage for service interruptions and may not adequately compensate us for any losses that
may occur due to any failures or interruptions in our systems. Further, we do not have multiple
site capacity for all of our services in the event of any such occurrence.
We may experience service disruptions for the following reasons:
|
|
|
occasional scheduled maintenance; |
|
|
|
volumes of visits to our websites that exceed our infrastructures capacity;
and |
|
|
|
natural disasters, telecommunications failures, power failures, other system
failures, maintenance, viruses, hacking or other events outside of our control. |
In addition, our networks and websites must accommodate a high volume of traffic and deliver
frequently updated information. They have experienced in the past, and may experience in the
future, slower response times or decreased traffic for a variety of reasons. There have been
instances where our online networks as a whole, or our websites individually, have been
inaccessible. Also, slower response times, which have occurred more frequently, can result from
general Internet problems, routing and equipment problems involving third party Internet access
providers, problems with third party advertising servers, increased traffic to our servers, viruses
and other security breaches, many of which problems are out of our control. In addition, our users
depend on Internet service providers and online service providers for access to our online networks
or websites. Those providers have experienced outages and delays in the past, and may experience
outages or delays in the future. Moreover, our Internet infrastructure might not be able to support
continued growth of our online networks or websites. Any of these problems could result in less
traffic to our networks or websites or harm the perception of our networks or websites as reliable
sources of information. Less traffic on our networks and websites or periodic interruptions in
service could have the effect of reducing demand for advertising on our networks or websites,
thereby reducing our advertising revenues.
Our networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized persons accessing our systems, viruses and other
disruptions, which could result in the theft of our proprietary information and/or disrupt our
Internet operations making our websites less attractive and reliable for our users and advertisers.
Internet usage could decline if any well-publicized compromise of security occurs. Hacking
involves efforts to gain unauthorized access to information or systems or to cause intentional
malfunctions or loss or corruption of data,
software, hardware or other computer equipment. Hackers, if successful, could misappropriate
proprietary information or cause disruptions in our service. We may be required to expend capital
and other resources to protect our websites against hackers. Our online networks could also be
affected by computer viruses or other similar disruptive problems, and we could inadvertently
transmit viruses across our networks to our users or other third parties. Any of these occurrences
could harm our business or give rise to a cause of action against us. Providing unimpeded access to
our online networks is critical to servicing our customers and providing superior customer service.
Our inability to provide continuous access to our online networks could cause some of our customers
to discontinue purchasing advertising programs and services and/or prevent or deter our users from
accessing our networks. Our activities and the activities of third party contractors involve the
storage and transmission of proprietary and personal information. Accordingly, security breaches
could expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. We cannot assure that
contractual provisions attempting to limit our liability in these areas will be successful or
enforceable, or that other parties will accept such contractual provisions as part of our
agreements.
41
We have identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting, which has
not been fully remediated. In addition, we may experience additional material weaknesses in the
future. Any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting or our failure to
remediate such material weaknesses could result in a material misstatement in our financial
statements not being prevented or detected and could adversely affect investor confidence in the
accuracy and completeness of our financial statements, as well as our stock price.
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. Our
current accounting and financial reporting system and related internal controls are inadequate to
carry out the volume and level of complexities associated with our online service revenue
transactions. There exists a reasonable possibility that a material error related to revenue and
revenue-related accounts would not be detected on a timely basis. This material weakness and our
remediation plans are described further in Item 4 of Part I in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting could result in material
misstatements in our financial statements not being prevented or detected. Although we have
implemented a Sarbanes-Oxley Remediation Plan, we may experience difficulties or delays in
achieving goals under this plan and completing remediation, or may not be able to successfully
remediate material weaknesses at all. Any material weakness or unsuccessful remediation could harm
investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial statements, which in turn
could harm our business and have an adverse effect on our stock price and our ability to raise
additional funds.
Our ability to raise capital in the future may be limited.
Our business and operations may consume resources faster than we anticipate. In the future, we
may need to raise additional funds to expand our sales and marketing and service development
efforts or to make acquisitions. Additional financing may not be available on favorable terms, if
at all. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to fund the
expansion of our sales and marketing and research and development efforts or take advantage of
acquisition or other opportunities, which could seriously harm our business and operating results.
If we incur debt, the debt holders would have rights senior to common stockholders to make claims
on our assets and the terms of any debt could restrict our operations, including our ability to pay
dividends on our common stock. Furthermore, if we issue additional equity securities, stockholders
will experience dilution, and the new equity securities could have rights senior to those of our
common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market
conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing
or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk of our future securities
offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their interest.
The impairment of a significant amount of goodwill and intangible assets on our balance sheet could
result in a decrease in earnings and, as a result, our stock price could decline.
In the course of our operating history, we have acquired assets and businesses. Some of our
acquisitions have resulted in the recording of a significant amount of goodwill and/or intangible
assets on our financial statements. We had approximately $101.9 million of goodwill and net
intangible assets as of September 30, 2011. The goodwill and/or intangible assets were recorded
because the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired was less than the purchase price. We may
not realize the full value of the goodwill and/or intangible assets. As such, we evaluate goodwill
and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for impairment on an annual basis or more
frequently if events or circumstances suggest that the asset may be impaired. We evaluate other
intangible assets subject to amortization whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. If goodwill or other intangible assets
are determined to be impaired, we will write off the unrecoverable portion as a charge to our
earnings. If we acquire new assets and businesses in the future, as we intend to do, we may record
additional goodwill and/or intangible assets. The possible write-off of the goodwill and/or
intangible assets could negatively impact our future earnings and, as a result, the market price of
our common stock could decline.
The trading value of our common stock may be volatile and decline substantially.
The trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile and could be subject to wide
fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. In addition to
the factors discussed in this Risk Factors section and elsewhere in this prospectus, these
factors include:
|
|
|
our operating performance and the operating performance of similar companies; |
|
|
|
the overall performance of the equity markets; |
42
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, business plans or
commercial relationships; |
|
|
|
threatened or actual litigation; |
|
|
|
changes in laws or regulations relating to the provision of Internet content; |
|
|
|
any major change in our board of directors or management; |
|
|
|
publication of research reports about us, our competitors or our industry, or
positive or negative recommendations or withdrawal of research coverage by securities
analysts; |
|
|
|
our sale of common stock or other securities in the future; |
|
|
|
large volumes of sales of our shares of common stock by existing stockholders;
and |
|
|
|
general political and economic conditions. |
In addition, the stock market in general, and historically the market for Internet-related
companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been
unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. Securities class
action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in
the overall market and in the market price of a companys securities. This litigation, if
instituted against us, could result in substantial costs, divert our managements attention and
resources and harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law could deter takeover
attempts.
Various provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could delay, prevent or make
more difficult a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or change of control. Our stockholders might
view any transaction of this type as being in their best interest since the transaction could
result in a higher stock price than the then-current market price for our common stock. Among other
things, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws:
|
|
|
authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock with the terms of
each series to be fixed by our board of directors, which could be used to institute a
poison pill that would work to dilute the share ownership of a potential hostile
acquirer, effectively preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our board; |
|
|
|
divide our board of directors into three classes so that only approximately
one-third of the total number of directors is elected each year; |
|
|
|
permit directors to be removed only for cause; |
|
|
|
prohibit action by less than unanimous written consent of our stockholders; and |
|
|
|
specify advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and director
nominations. In addition, with some exceptions, the Delaware General Corporation Law
restricts or delays mergers and other business combinations between us and any
stockholder that acquires 15% or more of our voting stock. |
Future sales of shares of our common stock by existing stockholders could depress the market price
of our common stock.
If our existing stockholders sell, or indicate an intent to sell, substantial amounts of our
common stock in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline
significantly. A large portion of our outstanding shares of common stock are held by our officers,
directors and significant stockholders. Two of the largest percentages of our shares are owned by
venture capital funds, which are typically structured to have a finite life. As these venture
capital funds approach or pass the respective terms of the fund, the decision to sell or hold our
stock may be based not only on the underlying investment merits of our stock, but also on the
requirements of their internal fund structure. Our directors, executive officers and significant
stockholders beneficially own approximately 23 million shares of our common stock, which represents
61% of our shares outstanding as of September 30, 2011. If these additional shares are sold, or if
it is perceived that they will be sold in the public market, the trading price of our common stock
could decline substantially.
A limited number of stockholders will have the ability to influence the outcome of director
elections and other matters requiring stockholder approval.
Our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders beneficially own approximately
61% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders, if they act together, could exert
substantial influence over matters
requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors, the amendment of
our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the approval of mergers or other business
combination transactions. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change
in control of our company, which could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a
premium for their stock as part of a sale of our company and might reduce our stock price. These
actions may be taken even if they are opposed by other stockholders.
43
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
(a) |
|
Sales of Unregistered Securities |
None.
(b) |
|
Use of Proceeds from Public Offering of Common Stock |
None.
(c) |
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers |
None.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Removed and reserved |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None.
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
44
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TECHTARGET, INC |
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2011
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ GREG STRAKOSCH
Greg Strakosch, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2011
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ JEFFREY WAKELY
Jeffrey Wakely, Chief Financial Officer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
|
|
45
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Greg Strakosch, Chief Executive Officer of TechTarget,
Inc., pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, dated November 9, 2011. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Jeffrey Wakely, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
TechTarget, Inc., pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, dated November 9, 2011. |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certifications of Greg Strakosch, Chief Executive Officer of TechTarget,
Inc. and Jeffrey Wakely, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
TechTarget, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, dated November 9,
2011. |
101.INS
|
* |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH
|
* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL
|
* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF
|
* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB
|
* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE
|
* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
* |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed
or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the
Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |
46