Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14D-9
SOLICITATION/RECOMMENDATION
STATEMENT
UNDER SECTION 14(d)(4) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT
NO. 1)
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC.
(Name
of Subject Company)
TECHTEAM
GLOBAL, INC.
(Name
of Person Filing Statement)
COMMON
STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE
(Title
of Class of Securities)
878311109
(CUSIP
Number of Class of Securities)
Michael A. Sosin,
Esq.
Corporate
Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
TechTeam
Global, Inc.
27335
West 11 Mile Road
Southfield,
Michigan 48033
(248)
357 2866
(Name,
address and telephone numbers of person authorized to receive notices and
communications on behalf of the persons filing statement)
With
copies to:
Jeffrey
R. Katz, Esq.
Ropes
& Gray LLP
Prudential
Tower, 800 Boylston Street
Boston,
MA 02199-3600
(617)
951 7072
o Check the box if the
filing relates solely to preliminary communications made before the commencement
of a tender offer.
This
Amendment No. 1 amends and supplements the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement
on Schedule 14D-9 initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”) on
November 12, 2010 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Schedule 14D-9”) by
TechTeam Global, Inc. (the “Company”). The
Schedule 14D-9 relates to the offer by Stefanini International Holdings
Ltd, a company incorporated and registered in England and Wales (“Parent”), through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Platinum Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“Purchaser”),
to acquire all issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, par
value $0.01 per share, in exchange for, with respect to each share, the right to
receive $8.35 in cash, without interest, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, dated November 12, 2010, and in
the related Letter of Transmittal, copies of which are filed as Exhibits
(a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B), to the Schedule 14D-9, respectively. Any
capitalized term used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning
ascribed to such term in the Schedule 14D-9.
All information in the Schedule 14D-9
is incorporated into this Amendment No. 1 by reference, except that such
information is hereby amended to the extent specifically provided
herein.
This Amendment No. 1 is being filed to
reflect certain updates as reflected below.
Item
8. Additional
Information
Section
(h) of Item 8 captioned “Regulatory Approvals” is hereby amended by
replacing the first and second paragraphs under the heading “U.S. Antitrust
Approval” of such section with the following paragraphs:
“Pursuant
to the requirements of the HSR Act, Marco Stefanini, on behalf of himself,
Parent, Purchaser, and the Company each filed a Premerger Notification and
Report Form with respect to the Offer and the Merger with the Federal Trade
Commission (the “FTC”) and the Antitrust
Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (the “Antitrust Division”) on November 15,
2010.
Under the
provisions of the HSR Act, applicable to the Offer, the acquisition of shares of
Common Stock pursuant to the Offer may be consummated following the expiration
of a 15-day waiting period following the filing by Parent of its Premerger
Notification and Report Form with respect to the Offer, which in this case would
be set to expire at 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on November 30, 2010, unless
Parent receives a request for additional information or documentary material
from the Antitrust Division or the FTC or unless early termination of the
waiting period is granted. If, within the initial 15-day waiting period, either
the Antitrust Division or the FTC requests additional information or documentary
material concerning the Offer, the waiting period will be extended through the
10th day after the date of substantial compliance by Parent. Complying with a
request for additional information or documentary material may take a
significant amount of time.”
Section
(i) of Item 8 captioned “Certain Litigation” is hereby amended and
supplemented by adding the following as the new second paragraph of such
section:
“On
November 16, 2010, a second putative stockholder class action complaint was
filed in the Oakland County Circuit Court in the State of Michigan against the
Company and the members of its Board of Directors, styled Litterio vs. Gary Cotshott, et.
al, Case No. 10-115011-NZ. Similar to the lawsuit described above, the
plaintiff in this action, purportedly on behalf of a class of stockholders,
alleges that the directors of the Company breached their fiduciary duties by
agreeing to the Merger Agreement and that the Company aided and abetted those
alleged breaches of duty. The Litterio complaint seeks
injunctive relief as well as an award of attorneys fees and costs.”
SIGNATURE
After due
inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that the
information set forth in this statement is true, complete and
correct.
|
By: /s/
Michael A. Sosin
|
Dated: November
19, 2010
|
Name: Michael
A. Sosin
Title: Corporate
Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
|