UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
1111 West Jefferson Street, Suite 200
Boise, Idaho 83702-5388
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(208) 384-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Commission File Number |
Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter |
I.R.S. Employer Identification No. |
State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization | |||
001-33541 | Boise Inc. | 20-8356960 | Delaware | |||
333-166926-04 | BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC | 27-1197223 | Delaware |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Boise Inc. |
Yes | x | No | ¨ | ||||
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC |
Yes | x | No | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Boise Inc. |
Yes | ¨ | No | ¨ | ||||
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC |
Yes | ¨ | No | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Boise Inc. |
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x | ||||||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ | |||||||
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) | ||||||||||
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC |
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | ||||||
Non-accelerated filer | x | Smaller reporting company | ¨ | |||||||
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Boise Inc. |
Yes | ¨ | No | x | ||||
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC |
Yes | ¨ | No | x |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
There were 83,207,315 common shares, $0.0001 per share par value, of Boise Inc. and 1,000 common units, $0.01 per unit par value, of BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC outstanding as of March 31, 2011.
This Form 10-Q is a combined quarterly report being filed separately by two registrants: Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC. BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC meets the conditions set forth in general instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format. Unless the context indicates otherwise, any reference in this report to the Company, we, us, our, or Boise refers to Boise Inc. together with BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries.
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. |
Financial Statements | 1 | ||||
Boise Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements |
1 | |||||
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements |
5 | |||||
Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements |
9 | |||||
9 | ||||||
10 | ||||||
12 | ||||||
12 | ||||||
13 | ||||||
13 | ||||||
14 | ||||||
14 | ||||||
14 | ||||||
15 | ||||||
16 | ||||||
17 | ||||||
18 | ||||||
19 | ||||||
20 | ||||||
21 | ||||||
21 | ||||||
23 | ||||||
23 | ||||||
20. Consolidating Guarantor and Nonguarantor Financial Information |
23 | |||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 33 | ||||
33 | ||||||
33 | ||||||
35 | ||||||
39 | ||||||
42 | ||||||
45 | ||||||
45 | ||||||
45 | ||||||
46 | ||||||
46 | ||||||
46 | ||||||
46 | ||||||
47 | ||||||
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 47 | ||||
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures | 47 |
i
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings | 49 | ||||
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors | 49 | ||||
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 49 | ||||
Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 49 | ||||
Item 4. |
(Removed and Reserved) | 50 | ||||
Item 5. |
Other Information | 50 | ||||
Item 6. |
Exhibits | 50 |
All reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are available free of charge via the Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) System on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. We also provide copies of our SEC filings at no charge upon request and make electronic copies of our reports available through our website at www.boiseinc.com as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material with the SEC.
ii
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Boise Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
(unaudited, dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share data)
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Sales |
||||||||
Trade |
$ | 560,320 | $ | 485,851 | ||||
Related parties |
8,443 | 8,254 | ||||||
568,763 | 494,105 | |||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||
Materials, labor, and other operating expenses |
449,070 | 408,485 | ||||||
Fiber costs from related parties |
4,440 | 9,831 | ||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion |
33,974 | 32,131 | ||||||
Selling and distribution expenses |
19,373 | 13,734 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
12,697 | 11,459 | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
1,077 | (175 | ) | |||||
520,631 | 475,465 | |||||||
Income from operations |
48,132 | 18,640 | ||||||
Foreign exchange gain |
132 | 687 | ||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| (22,197 | ) | |||||
Interest expense |
(16,367 | ) | (16,474 | ) | ||||
Interest income |
78 | 37 | ||||||
(16,157 | ) | (37,947 | ) | |||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
31,975 | (19,307 | ) | |||||
Income tax (provision) benefit |
(13,281 | ) | 6,622 | |||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18,694 | $ | (12,685 | ) | |||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
80,964 | 79,800 | ||||||
Diluted |
90,417 | 79,800 | ||||||
Net income (loss) per common share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.23 | $ | (0.16 | ) | |||
Diluted |
$ | 0.21 | $ | (0.16 | ) |
See accompanying condensed notes to unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements.
1
Boise Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 60,136 | $ | 166,833 | ||||
Short-term investments |
| 10,621 | ||||||
Receivables |
||||||||
Trade, less allowances of $822 and $603 |
223,660 | 188,589 | ||||||
Other |
8,841 | 3,839 | ||||||
Inventories |
278,020 | 261,471 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
18,490 | 16,658 | ||||||
Prepaid and other |
8,769 | 5,214 | ||||||
597,916 | 653,225 | |||||||
Property |
||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,218,630 | 1,199,035 | ||||||
Fiber farms and deposits |
18,505 | 18,285 | ||||||
1,237,135 | 1,217,320 | |||||||
Deferred financing costs |
29,042 | 30,396 | ||||||
Goodwill |
101,258 | | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
104,225 | 29,605 | ||||||
Other assets |
8,788 | 8,444 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,078,364 | $ | 1,938,990 | ||||
See accompanying condensed notes to unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements.
2
Boise Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
(unaudited, dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share data)
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 50,000 | $ | 43,750 | ||||
Income taxes payable |
278 | 82 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
186,196 | 179,214 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
48,872 | 54,574 | ||||||
Interest payable |
23,271 | 10,535 | ||||||
Other |
17,793 | 16,123 | ||||||
326,410 | 304,278 | |||||||
Debt |
||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
780,581 | 738,081 | ||||||
Other |
||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
135,964 | 88,200 | ||||||
Compensation and benefits |
120,885 | 121,318 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
47,544 | 40,278 | ||||||
304,393 | 249,796 | |||||||
Commitments and contingent liabilities |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share: |
||||||||
1,000 shares authorized; none issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.0001 par value per share: |
||||||||
250,000 shares authorized; 83,207 shares and 84,845 shares issued and outstanding |
8 | 8 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
582,059 | 581,442 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
(77,988 | ) | (78,822 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
162,901 | 144,207 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
666,980 | 646,835 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 2,078,364 | $ | 1,938,990 | ||||
See accompanying condensed notes to unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements.
3
Boise Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash provided by (used for) operations |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18,694 | $ | (12,685 | ) | |||
Items in net income (loss) not using (providing) cash |
||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of deferred financing costs and other |
35,539 | 35,066 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
648 | 894 | ||||||
Pension expense |
3,169 | 2,568 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
11,420 | (7,461 | ) | |||||
Change in fair value of energy derivatives |
(742 | ) | 3,330 | |||||
(Gain) loss on sales of assets, net |
278 | (114 | ) | |||||
Other |
1,629 | (658 | ) | |||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 22,197 | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in working capital, net of acquisitions |
||||||||
Receivables |
(8,361 | ) | 58,213 | |||||
Inventories |
2,379 | (16,085 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses |
(578 | ) | 389 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(5,481 | ) | (13,057 | ) | ||||
Current and deferred income taxes |
1,634 | 831 | ||||||
Pension payments |
(3,370 | ) | (5,689 | ) | ||||
Other |
5,392 | 223 | ||||||
Cash provided by operations |
62,250 | 67,962 | ||||||
Cash provided by (used for) investment |
||||||||
Acquisition of businesses and facilities, net of cash acquired |
(201,734 | ) | | |||||
Expenditures for property and equipment |
(24,650 | ) | (14,734 | ) | ||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
(3,514 | ) | (2,388 | ) | ||||
Maturities of short-term investments |
14,114 | 5,182 | ||||||
Sales of assets |
1,088 | 22 | ||||||
Other |
(779 | ) | 1,093 | |||||
Cash used for investment |
(215,475 | ) | (10,825 | ) | ||||
Cash provided by (used for) financing |
||||||||
Issuances of long-term debt |
75,000 | 300,000 | ||||||
Payments of long-term debt |
(26,250 | ) | (323,683 | ) | ||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
(160 | ) | (11,779 | ) | ||||
Other |
(2,062 | ) | | |||||
Cash provided by (used for) financing |
46,528 | (35,462 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(106,697 | ) | 21,675 | |||||
Balance at beginning of the period |
166,833 | 69,393 | ||||||
Balance at end of the period |
$ | 60,136 | $ | 91,068 | ||||
See accompanying condensed notes to unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements.
4
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Sales |
||||||||
Trade |
$ | 560,320 | $ | 485,851 | ||||
Related parties |
8,443 | 8,254 | ||||||
568,763 | 494,105 | |||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||
Materials, labor, and other operating expenses |
449,070 | 408,485 | ||||||
Fiber costs from related parties |
4,440 | 9,831 | ||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion |
33,974 | 32,131 | ||||||
Selling and distribution expenses |
19,373 | 13,734 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
12,697 | 11,459 | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
1,077 | (175 | ) | |||||
520,631 | 475,465 | |||||||
Income from operations |
48,132 | 18,640 | ||||||
Foreign exchange gain |
132 | 687 | ||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| (22,197 | ) | |||||
Interest expense |
(16,367 | ) | (16,474 | ) | ||||
Interest income |
78 | 37 | ||||||
(16,157 | ) | (37,947 | ) | |||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
31,975 | (19,307 | ) | |||||
Income tax (provision) benefit |
(13,281 | ) | 7,458 | |||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18,694 | $ | (11,849 | ) | |||
See accompanying condensed notes to unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements.
5
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 60,136 | $ | 166,833 | ||||
Short-term investments |
| 10,621 | ||||||
Receivables |
||||||||
Trade, less allowances of $822 and $603 |
223,660 | 188,589 | ||||||
Other |
8,841 | 3,839 | ||||||
Inventories |
278,020 | 261,471 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
18,490 | 16,658 | ||||||
Prepaid and other |
8,769 | 5,214 | ||||||
597,916 | 653,225 | |||||||
Property |
||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,218,630 | 1,199,035 | ||||||
Fiber farms and deposits |
18,505 | 18,285 | ||||||
1,237,135 | 1,217,320 | |||||||
Deferred financing costs |
29,042 | 30,396 | ||||||
Goodwill |
101,258 | | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
104,225 | 29,605 | ||||||
Other assets |
8,788 | 8,444 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,078,364 | $ | 1,938,990 | ||||
See accompanying condensed notes to unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements.
6
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL |
||||||||
Current |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 50,000 | $ | 43,750 | ||||
Income taxes payable |
278 | 82 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
186,196 | 179,214 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
48,872 | 54,574 | ||||||
Interest payable |
23,271 | 10,535 | ||||||
Other |
17,793 | 16,123 | ||||||
326,410 | 304,278 | |||||||
Debt |
||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
780,581 | 738,081 | ||||||
Other |
||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
127,215 | 79,451 | ||||||
Compensation and benefits |
120,885 | 121,318 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
47,796 | 40,530 | ||||||
295,896 | 241,299 | |||||||
Commitments and contingent liabilities |
||||||||
Capital |
||||||||
Business unit equity |
675,477 | 655,332 | ||||||
Total liabilities and capital |
$ | 2,078,364 | $ | 1,938,990 | ||||
See accompanying condensed notes to unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements.
7
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash provided by (used for) operations |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18,694 | $ | (11,849 | ) | |||
Items in net income (loss) not using (providing) cash |
||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of deferred financing costs and other |
35,539 | 35,066 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
648 | 894 | ||||||
Pension expense |
3,169 | 2,568 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
11,420 | (7,461 | ) | |||||
Change in fair value of energy derivatives |
(742 | ) | 3,330 | |||||
(Gain) loss on sales of assets, net |
278 | (114 | ) | |||||
Other |
1,629 | (658 | ) | |||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 22,197 | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in working capital, net of acquisitions |
||||||||
Receivables |
(8,361 | ) | 58,213 | |||||
Inventories |
2,379 | (16,085 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses |
(578 | ) | 389 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(5,481 | ) | (13,057 | ) | ||||
Current and deferred income taxes |
1,634 | (5 | ) | |||||
Pension payments |
(3,370 | ) | (5,689 | ) | ||||
Other |
5,392 | 223 | ||||||
Cash provided by operations |
62,250 | 67,962 | ||||||
Cash provided by (used for) investment |
||||||||
Acquisition of businesses and facilities, net of cash acquired |
(201,734 | ) | | |||||
Expenditures for property and equipment |
(24,650 | ) | (14,734 | ) | ||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
(3,514 | ) | (2,388 | ) | ||||
Maturities of short-term investments |
14,114 | 5,182 | ||||||
Sales of assets |
1,088 | 22 | ||||||
Other |
(779 | ) | 1,093 | |||||
Cash used for investment |
(215,475 | ) | (10,825 | ) | ||||
Cash provided by (used for) financing |
||||||||
Issuances of long-term debt |
75,000 | 300,000 | ||||||
Payments of long-term debt |
(26,250 | ) | (323,683 | ) | ||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
(160 | ) | (11,779 | ) | ||||
Payments (to) from Boise Inc., net |
(62 | ) | | |||||
Other |
(2,000 | ) | | |||||
Cash provided by (used for) financing |
46,528 | (35,462 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(106,697 | ) | 21,675 | |||||
Balance at beginning of the period |
166,833 | 69,393 | ||||||
Balance at end of the period |
$ | 60,136 | $ | 91,068 | ||||
See accompanying condensed notes to unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements.
8
Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Nature of Operations
Boise Inc. is a large, diverse United States-based manufacturer of paper and packaging products. The products we manufacture include papers used for communication, such as office papers, commercial printing papers, envelopes, forms, and newsprint, as well as papers that are associated with packaging, including label and release and flexible papers used for food wrap and other applications. We also manufacture linerboard and corrugating medium, which are combined to make containerboard, the base raw material in our corrugated sheets and containers. We own mill operations in the following locations: Jackson, Alabama; International Falls, Minnesota; St. Helens, Oregon; and Wallula, Washington, all of which manufacture uncoated freesheet paper. We also own a mill in DeRidder, Louisiana, which produces linerboard as well as newsprint. Additionally, we have a network of eight corrugated container plants located in the Western U.S.; four corrugated sheet plants in Georgia, Nevada, Texas, and Washington; a corrugated sheet feeder plant in Texas; and four distribution facilities.
The following sets forth our operating structure:
As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately 5,000 employees. Approximately 53% of these employees worked pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. In April 2011, our hourly employees at our DeRidder, Louisiana, mill approved a new collective bargaining agreement. Following the approval of this agreement, approximately 36% of our employees are now working pursuant to collective bargaining agreements that have expired or will expire within one year.
Basis of Presentation
Boise Inc., headquartered in Boise, Idaho, operates and reports its business in three reportable segments: Paper, Packaging, and Corporate and Other (support services). See Note 17, Segment Information, for additional information about our reportable segments.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein are those of the following:
| Boise Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (BZ Intermediate). |
| BZ Intermediate and its wholly owned subsidiaries, parent company to Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C. (Boise Paper Holdings). |
9
There are no significant differences between the results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows of Boise Inc. and those of BZ Intermediate other than income taxes. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms Company, we, us, our, or Boise refer to Boise Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including BZ Intermediate.
The quarterly consolidated financial statements presented have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm but, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the results for the periods presented. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements involves the use of estimates and accruals. Actual results may vary from those estimates. Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the full year. These condensed notes to unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and the other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
2. Acquisition of Tharco Packaging, Inc.
On March 1, 2011, our wholly owned subsidiary Boise Paper Holdings acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Tharco Packaging, Inc. (Tharco) for a preliminary purchase price of $201.1 million plus or minus working capital adjustments (the Tharco Acquisition). We financed the acquisition with existing cash and $75 million in borrowings on our revolving credit facility, which is discussed further in Note 11, Debt. The acquisition expands and diversifies our presence in packaging markets; extends our geographical reach from the Pacific Northwest to California, Colorado, Arizona, and Georgia; and will increase our containerboard integration from approximately 70% to approximately 85%.
Our purchase price allocation is preliminary. Once fair values are finalized, we may have changes to the amounts we have included in our preliminary allocation. The stock purchase agreement provides for, among other terms, (1) an adjustment to the purchase price based on a final working capital true-up and (2) indemnification provisions for claims that may arise including other third-party claims.
The following table summarizes our preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on our current estimates of the fair value at the date of the Tharco Acquisition (dollars in thousands):
March 1, 2011 Fair Value |
||||
Current assets (a) |
$ | 53,911 | ||
Property and equipment (b) |
27,505 | |||
Intangible assets (c): |
||||
Customer relationships |
64,500 | |||
Trademarks and trade name |
10,900 | |||
Noncompete agreement |
300 | |||
Goodwill (d) |
101,258 | |||
Other long-term assets |
477 | |||
Assets acquired |
258,851 | |||
Current liabilities |
21,359 | |||
Deferred tax liability |
33,653 | |||
Unfavorable leases |
2,583 | |||
Other long-term liabilities |
136 | |||
Liabilities assumed |
57,731 | |||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 201,120 | ||
(a) | Includes $29.6 million of receivables and $20.7 million of inventories. |
(b) | We are depreciating the property and equipment acquired on a straight-line basis over their estimated remaining lives, which range from one to twenty years. |
10
(c) | We are amortizing the intangible assets on a straight-line basis over the following (in years): |
Customer relationships |
17 | |||
Trademarks and trade name |
15 | |||
Noncompete agreement |
2 |
(d) | The Tharco Acquisition resulted in $101.3 million of goodwill, which we recorded in our Packaging segment. Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The goodwill recognized in the transaction is not deductible for income tax purposes. However, we assumed $12.9 million of goodwill in the transaction that Tharco had been amortizing in connection with previous acquisitions, which we will continue to amortize and deduct for income tax purposes. |
During first quarter 2011, we expensed $0.6 million of costs related to the Tharco Acquisition for legal, professional, and advisory services. All costs were expensed as incurred and recorded in Other (income) expense, net in our Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss).
Beginning March 1, 2011, we included Tharcos results of operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Cash Flows, which included $25.3 million of net sales and a $1.1 million operating loss. Tharcos operating loss is primarily the result of $2.2 million of expense related to the inventory purchase price adjustments that were recognized in March 2011. These results are included in our Packaging segment.
The following pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations as if Tharco had been combined with us on January 1, 2010. The pro forma results are intended for information purposes only and do not purport to represent what the combined companies results of operations would actually have been had the transaction in fact occurred on January 1, 2010. They also do not reflect any cost savings, operating synergies, or revenue enhancements that we may achieve or the costs necessary to achieve those cost savings, operating synergies, revenue enhancements, or integration efforts (dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts).
Pro Forma | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31 |
Year Ended December 31 |
|||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Sales |
$ | 610,414 | $ | 2,355,737 | ||||
Net income (a) |
18,959 | 67,566 | ||||||
Net income per sharediluted |
0.21 | 0.80 |
(a) | The March 31, 2011, pro forma financial information was adjusted to exclude $3.3 million of expenses for legal, accounting, and other advisory-related services and $2.2 million of expense related to inventory purchase price adjustments. The December 31, 2010, pro forma financial information was adjusted to include these charges. Pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2010, includes $22.2 million of noncash expense associated with refinancing our debt in 2010. |
11
3. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Boise Inc.s basic and diluted net income (loss) per share is calculated as follows (dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share data):
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18,694 | $ | (12,685 | ) | |||
Weighted average number of common shares for basic net income (loss) per share |
80,964 | 79,800 | ||||||
Incremental effect of dilutive common stock equivalents: |
||||||||
Common stock warrants (a) |
6,504 | | ||||||
Stock options |
10 | | ||||||
Restricted stock and restricted stock units (b) |
2,939 | | ||||||
Weighted average number of shares for diluted net income (loss) per share |
90,417 | 79,800 | ||||||
Net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.23 | $ | (0.16 | ) | |||
Diluted (a)(b) |
$ | 0.21 | $ | (0.16 | ) | |||
(a) | For the three months ended March 31, 2010, warrants to purchase 44.4 million shares of common stock, which are accounted for under the treasury stock method, were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share, because the exercise price exceeded the average market price of our common stock. |
(b) | Restricted stock and restricted stock units for the three months ended March 31, 2010, were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share, because inclusion of these amounts would have been antidilutive. |
Net income (loss) per common share is not applicable to BZ Intermediate, because it does not have common shares.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, Boise Inc. recorded $13.3 million of income tax expense and a $6.6 million income tax benefit, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, Boise Inc.s effective tax rate was 41.5%, compared with a 34.3% tax benefit rate for the same period in 2010. In both periods, the primary reason for the difference from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35.0% was the effect of state income taxes and discrete tax items.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, BZ Intermediate recorded $13.3 million of income tax expense and a $7.5 million income tax benefit, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, BZ Intermediates effective tax rate was 41.5%, compared with a 38.6% tax benefit rate for the same period in 2010. In both periods, the primary reason for the difference from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35.0% was the effect of state income taxes and discrete tax items.
Uncertain Income Tax Positions
Both Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Interest expense related to uncertain tax positions was nominal for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. We did not record any penalties associated with our uncertain tax positions during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Other
Due to Internal Revenue Code Section 382, changes in our ownership limit the amount of net operating losses that we may utilize in any one year. However, we believe it is more likely than not that our net operating losses will be fully realized before they expire in 2028 and 2029.
12
We file federal income tax returns in the U.S. and state income tax returns in various state jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities. BZ Intermediate is a wholly owned, consolidated entity of Boise Inc., and its tax return is filed under the consolidated tax return of Boise Inc. Open tax years for Boise Inc. are 2010, 2009, 2008, and 2007.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, payments made for taxes, net of refunds received, were $0.2 million, and during the three months ended March 31, 2010, refunds received for taxes, net of payments made, were $0.3 million.
5. Transactions With Related Parties
For the period of February 22, 2008, through early March 2010, Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C. (Boise Cascade) held a significant equity interest in us, and our transactions with Boise Cascade were recorded as related-party transactions. In early March 2010, Boise Cascade sold all of its remaining investment in us, and accordingly, it is no longer a related party. As a result, beginning in March 2010, our transactions (discussed below) with Louisiana Timber Procurement Company, L.L.C. (LTP) represent the only significant related-party activity recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Related-Party Sales
LTP is a variable-interest entity that is 50% owned by Boise Inc. and 50% owned by Boise Cascade. LTP procures saw timber, pulpwood, residual chips, and other residual wood fiber to meet the wood and fiber requirements of Boise Inc. and Boise Cascade. We are the primary beneficiary of LTP, as we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of LTP. Therefore, we consolidate LTP in our financial statements in our Packaging segment. At both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the carrying amounts of LTPs assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets were $2.8 million and $2.1 million, and they related primarily to noninventory working capital items. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we recorded $8.4 million and $5.6 million, respectively, of LTP sales to Boise Cascade in Sales, Related parties in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and approximately the same amount of expenses in Materials, labor, and other operating expenses. The sales were at prices designed to approximate market prices.
We have an outsourcing services agreement under which we provide a number of corporate staff services to Boise Cascade at our cost. These services include information technology, accounting, and human resource services. The agreement, as extended, expires on February 22, 2013. It will automatically renew for one-year terms unless either party provides notice of termination to the other party at least 12 months in advance of the expiration date. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded $2.6 million of revenues in Sales, Related parties in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). We also provide transportation services to Boise Cascade at our cost. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the costs and revenues associated with our transportation services to Boise Cascade were not significant.
Related-Party Costs and Expenses
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, fiber purchases from related parties were $4.4 million and $9.8 million, respectively. In 2011, most of these purchases related to chip and log purchases from LTPs wood products business, whereas in 2010, the purchases related to chip and log purchases from Boise Cascade while they were a related party as well as purchases from LTP. All of the costs associated with these purchases were recorded as Fiber costs from related parties in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Fiber purchases from Boise Cascade subsequent to February 2010 are recorded as Materials, labor, and other operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
We lease our distribution centers, as well as other property and equipment, under operating leases, including facilities and equipment acquired in the Tharco Acquisition. For purposes of determining straight-line rent expense, the lease term is calculated from the date of possession of the facility, including any periods of free rent and any renewal option periods that are reasonably assured of being exercised. Straight-line rent expense is also adjusted to reflect any allowances or reimbursements provided by the lessor. We had an insignificant amount of sublease rental income in the periods
13
presented below. Accordingly, our future minimum lease payment requirements have not been reduced by sublease rental income. Rental expense for operating leases is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Rental expense |
$ | 4,605 | $ | 3,727 |
For noncancelable operating leases with remaining terms of more than one year, the minimum lease payment requirements are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Remaining 2011 |
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016
& Thereafter |
|||||||||||||||||||
Minimum payment |
$ | 15,557 | $ | 20,369 | $ | 16,286 | $ | 12,324 | $ | 10,014 | $ | 18,381 |
Substantially all lease agreements have fixed payment terms based on the passage of time. Some lease agreements provide us with the option to purchase the leased property. Additionally, some agreements contain renewal options averaging approximately five years, with fixed payment terms similar to those in the original lease agreements.
Sales to OfficeMax represent a concentration in the volume of business transacted and in revenue generated from those transactions. Sales to OfficeMax were $126.4 million and $128.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, representing 22% and 26% of total sales for those periods. At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, we had $37.1 million and $30.3 million, respectively, of accounts receivable due from OfficeMax.
The majority of our inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, where cost is based on the average cost method of inventory valuation. Manufactured inventories include costs for materials, labor, and factory overhead. Other inventories are valued at the lower of either standard cost, which approximates cost based on actual first-in, first-out usage pattern, or market.
Inventories include the following (dollars in thousands):
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Finished goods |
$ | 133,313 | $ | 123,329 | ||||
Work in process |
30,258 | 34,906 | ||||||
Fiber |
41,180 | 36,166 | ||||||
Other raw materials and supplies |
73,269 | 67,070 | ||||||
$ | 278,020 | $ | 261,471 | |||||
Property and equipment consist of the following asset classes (dollars in thousands):
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Land |
$ | 31,875 | $ | 31,875 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
224,657 | 219,345 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
1,296,635 | 1,260,265 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
35,762 | 27,667 | ||||||
1,588,929 | 1,539,152 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(370,299 | ) | (340,117 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,218,630 | $ | 1,199,035 | |||||
14
Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, was $31.2 million and $29.9 million, respectively.
10. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. At March 31, 2011, we had $101.3 million of goodwill recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, all of which was recorded in connection with the Tharco Acquisition in our Packaging segment. For further information regarding the Tharco Acquisition, see Note 2, Acquisition of Tharco Packaging, Inc. At March 31, 2011, the net carrying amount of intangible assets with indefinite lives, which represents the trade names and trademarks acquired from Boise Cascade, L.L.C., in 2008, was $16.8 million, all of which is recorded in our Paper segment. All of our other intangible assets amortize based on their estimated useful lives.
We maintain two reporting units for purposes of our goodwill and intangible asset impairment testing, Paper and Packaging, which are the same as our operating segments discussed in Note 17, Segment Information. We test the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in each of our reporting units for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or sooner if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may exceed fair value. Additionally, we evaluate the remaining useful lives of our finite-lived purchased intangible assets to determine whether any adjustments to the useful lives are necessary. There is currently no indication of goodwill and intangible asset impairment.
The following table sets forth our intangible asset amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Intangible asset amortization |
$ | 1,079 | $ | 688 |
Our estimated future amortization expense for the remainder of 2011 and the next five years is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Remaining 2011 |
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization expense |
$ | 5,584 | $ | 7,435 | $ | 6,165 | $ | 5,912 | $ | 5,912 | $ | 5,912 |
The gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization, and net carrying amount of our intangible assets at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
As of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Gross
Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Amount |
||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 78,200 | $ | (4,540 | ) | $ | 73,660 | |||||
Trademarks and trade names |
27,700 | (62 | ) | 27,638 | ||||||||
Technology and other |
6,895 | (4,255 | ) | 2,640 | ||||||||
Noncompete agreements |
300 | (13 | ) | 287 | ||||||||
$ | 113,095 | $ | (8,870 | ) | $ | 104,225 | ||||||
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Gross
Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Amount |
||||||||||
Trademarks and trade names |
$ | 16,800 | $ | | $ | 16,800 | ||||||
Customer relationships |
13,700 | (3,882 | ) | 9,818 | ||||||||
Technology and other |
6,895 | (3,908 | ) | 2,987 | ||||||||
$ | 37,395 | $ | (7,790 | ) | $ | 29,605 | ||||||
15
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, our long-term debt and the interest rates on that debt were as follows (dollars in thousands):
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Interest Rate | Amount | Interest Rate | |||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility, due 2013 |
$ | 55,000 | 3.25 | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||
Tranche A term loan, due 2013 |
175,581 | 3.25 | 181,831 | 3.06 | ||||||||||||
9% senior notes, due 2017 |
300,000 | 9.00 | 300,000 | 9.00 | ||||||||||||
8% senior notes, due 2020 |
300,000 | 8.00 | 300,000 | 8.00 | ||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
(50,000 | ) | 3.25 | (43,750 | ) | 3.06 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
780,581 | 7.29 | 738,081 | 7.48 | ||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
50,000 | 3.25 | 43,750 | 3.06 | ||||||||||||
$ | 830,581 | 7.04 | % | $ | 781,831 | 7.24 | % | |||||||||
As of March 31, 2011, Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediates debt consisted of the following:
| The Revolving Credit Facility: A five-year nonamortizing $250.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility with interest at either the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin, which is currently 300 basis points, or a calculated base rate plus an applicable margin, which is currently 200 basis points (collectively with the Tranche A term loan facility, the Amended Credit Facilities). |
| The Tranche A Term Loan Facility: A five-year amortizing senior secured loan facility with interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin, which is currently 300 basis points, or a calculated base rate plus an applicable margin, which is currently 200 basis points. The Tranche A term loan facility was originally issued at $250.0 million. |
| The 9% Senior Notes: An eight-year nonamortizing $300.0 million senior unsecured debt obligation with annual interest at 9%. |
| The 8% Senior Notes: A ten-year nonamortizing $300.0 million senior unsecured debt obligation with annual interest at 8%. |
In addition to paying interest, we pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility at a rate of 0.50% per annum (which shall be reduced to 0.375% when the leverage ratio is less than 2.25:1.00) times the daily average undrawn portion of the Revolving Credit Facility (reduced by the amount of letters of credit issued and outstanding). We also pay letter of credit fees of 300 basis points times the average daily maximum outstanding amount of the letters of credit and a fronting fee of 15 basis points to the issuing bank of outstanding letters of credit. These fees are payable quarterly and in arrears.
The borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility ranged from a low of zero to a high of $75 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011. The weighted average amount of borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility during the three months ended March 31, 2011, was $26.4 million. At March 31, 2011, we had availability of $186.9 million, which is net of outstanding letters of credit of $8.1 million.
The Amended Credit Facilities and the senior note agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments, capital expenditures, financial ratios, guarantees, and the incurrence of additional indebtedness, which are discussed in Note 11, Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in our 2010 Form 10-K.
16
Other Provisions
Subject to specified exceptions, the Amended Credit Facilities require that the proceeds from certain asset sales, casualty insurance, and certain debt issuances be used to pay down outstanding borrowings. As of March 31, 2011, required debt principal repayments were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Remaining 2011 |
2012 | 2013 | 2014-2016 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||
Required debt principal repayments |
$ | 37,500 | $ | 129,688 | $ | 63,393 | $ | | $ | 600,000 |
Other
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, we had $29.0 million and $30.4 million, respectively, of costs recorded in Deferred financing costs on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The amortization of these costs is recorded in interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the loans. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we recorded $1.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively, of amortization expense in Interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, cash payments for interest were $2.1 million and $6.0 million, respectively.
Our primary objective in holding derivative financial instruments is to manage cash flow risk related to natural gas purchases and, to a lesser extent, interest rate risk. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
Interest Rate RiskDebt
With the exception of the Amended Credit Facilities, our debt is fixed-rate debt. At March 31, 2011, the book value of our fixed-rate debt was $600.0 million, and the fair value was estimated to be $682.4 million. The difference between the book value and fair value is due to the difference between the period-end market interest rate and the stated rate of our fixed-rate, long-term debt. We estimated the fair value based on quoted market prices for our debt and the discounted value of our expected future cash payments.
Energy Risk
We enter into transactions to hedge the variable cash flow risk of natural gas purchases. At March 31, 2011, these derivatives included three-way collars and call spreads. We have elected to account for these instruments as economic hedges. As of March 31, 2011, we had entered into derivative instruments related to the following approximate percentages of our forecasted natural gas purchases:
April 2011 Through October 2011 |
November
2011 Through March 2012 |
April 2012 Through October 2012 |
November
2012 Through March 2013 |
|||||||||||||
Approximate percent hedged |
45 | % | 32 | % | 23 | % | 5 | % |
Fair Value Measurements
The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted market prices (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). In general, and where applicable, we use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities to determine fair value (Level 1). If quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities are not available to determine fair value, we use quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2). If quoted prices for identical or similar assets are not available or are unobservable, we may use internally developed
17
valuation models, whose inputs include bid prices and third-party valuations utilizing underlying asset assumptions (Level 3). We enter into our hedges with large financial institutions, and we monitor credit ratings to consider the impact, if any, on the determination of fair value. No significant adjustments were made in any periods presented.
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the fair value of our financial instruments was determined based on applicable interest rates such as LIBOR, interest rate curves, and New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) price quotations under the terms of the contracts, using current market information as of the reporting date. Certificates of deposit, interest rate contracts, and energy derivatives are valued using third-party valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities. Accordingly, all of our fair value measurements use Level 2 inputs. During first quarter 2011, we liquidated all of our certificates of deposit. At December 31, 2010, the fair value of the certificates of deposit was $10.6 million.
The fair value of our derivative instruments as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs | ||||||||||||||||
Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
March 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,315 | $ | 2,056 | ||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
| | 1,315 | 2,056 | ||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,315 | $ | 2,056 | ||||||||
(a) | Recorded in Accrued liabilities, Other on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
The effects of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31 |
||||||||||
Derivative |
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives |
2011 |
2010 | |||||||
Interest rate contracts |
Interest expense |
$ | | $ | (29 | ) | ||||
Energy derivatives |
Materials, labor, and other operating expenses |
742 | (3,330 | ) | ||||||
$ | 742 | $ | (3,359 | ) | ||||||
13. Retirement and Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic pension benefit costs are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Pension Benefits | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Service cost |
$ | 1,338 | $ | 1,508 | ||||
Interest cost |
6,409 | 6,346 | ||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(6,098 | ) | (5,879 | ) | ||||
Amortization of actuarial loss |
1,389 | 455 | ||||||
Amortization of prior service costs and other |
13 | 13 | ||||||
Company-sponsored plans |
3,051 | 2,443 | ||||||
Multiemployer plans |
118 | 125 | ||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 3,169 | $ | 2,568 | ||||
18
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we made contributions of $3.4 million to our qualified pension plans. Including our first quarter contributions, we expect to contribute approximately $25 million to our qualified pension plans during 2011.
Under the Boise Inc. Incentive and Performance Plan (the Plan), the compensation committee of our board of directors has the ability to authorize the grant of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards payable in stock upon the attainment of specified performance goals, stock options, and other stock- and cash-based awards. Awards granted under the Plan vest and expire in accordance with terms established at the time of grant. Shares issued pursuant to awards under the Plan are from our authorized but unissued shares. A detailed discussion of previous grants made under the Plan is presented in Note 14, Stockholders Equity and Capital, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in our 2010 Form 10-K. The discussion below focuses on activity from January through March 31, 2011.
March 15, 2011, Equity Grants
Pursuant to the Plan, on March 15, 2011, we granted a combination of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, and performance units to our directors and key employees as follows.
Restricted Stock Awards. We granted approximately 137,000 shares of restricted stock and approximately 103,000 restricted stock units (collectively restricted stock), the majority of which are subject to an EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation, amortization, and depletion) goal and all of which are subject to time-based vesting restrictions. For members of management, 50% of the awards vest on March 15, 2013, and the remaining 50% vest on March 17, 2014, subject to the provisions of the award agreements. We also granted to our directors approximately 99,000 shares of restricted stock, which will vest on March 15, 2012. The fair values of these awards were based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant, and compensation expense is recorded over the awards vesting periods.
Stock Option Awards. We granted approximately 359,000 nonqualified stock options to members of management. 50% of the option awards vest and become exercisable on March 15, 2013, and the remaining 50% vest and become exercisable on March 17, 2014. The stock options have a contractual term of ten years. The exercise price of these stock options is $8.55 per share, which was the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date. We recognize the grant date fair value of stock options as compensation expense over the awards vesting periods.
The fair value of the stock options granted on March 15, 2011, was $4.21. We calculated the fair value using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model based on the market price of our common stock at the grant date and the assumptions specific to the underlying options. We based the expected volatility assumption on our historic stock performance and the volatility of related industry stocks. We used the simplified method defined in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 to determine the expected life assumption for the options. As this is our first issuance of stock options and our equity shares have been traded for a relatively short period of time, we do not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected life. We based the risk-free interest rate upon yields of U.S. Treasury issues with terms similar to the expected life of the options.
The following table presents the assumptions used to calculate the fair value of stock options:
Black-Scholes-Merton assumptions: |
||||
Expected volatility |
47.85 | % | ||
Expected life (years) |
6.25 | |||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.48 | % | ||
Expected dividend yield |
|
Performance-Unit Awards. We granted members of management approximately 200,000 performance units, subject to adjustment based on the achievement of defined percentages of the two-year average return on net operating assets (RONOA). Because the RONOA component contains a performance condition, we record compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite
19
service period based on the most probable number of awards expected to vest. If the RONOA performance criteria are met, 50% of the performance units will vest on March 15, 2013, and the remaining 50% will vest on March 17, 2014. Any shares not vested on or before March 17, 2014, will be forfeited. We based the fair value of this award on the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date, and we record compensation expense over the awards vesting periods.
Special Equity Award in Lieu of Special Dividend. In 2010, we declared a special cash dividend payable on December 3, 2010, to shareholders of record on November 17, 2010. On the record date, the executive officers held unvested restricted stock that, pursuant to the terms of their award agreements, did not accrue dividends. We approved a special equity award to our executive officers to align management and shareholder interests regarding dividend strategy. We awarded approximately 68,000 shares of restricted stock and approximately 26,000 restricted stock units to our executive officers, equivalent in value to the dividends the officer would have received on his or her restricted stock held as of the record date. These awards will vest on March 15, 2012. We calculated the number of shares awarded to each officer by using the companys share price on February 28, 2011 (for restricted stock vesting on that date) or March 15, 2011 (for remaining restricted stock). We based the fair value of this award on the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date, and we record compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the awards vesting periods.
The other key members of management that held unvested restricted stock or restricted stock units as of the record date received a cash bonus equivalent in value to the dividends the member would have received on his or her restricted stock held as of the record date.
Compensation Expense
Total recognized share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock, performance units, and stock options, net of estimated forfeitures, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 (a) | 2010 (a) | |||||||
Restricted stock and performance units |
$ | 608 | $ | 894 | ||||
Stock options |
40 | | ||||||
Total share-based compensation expense |
$ | 648 | $ | 894 | ||||
(a) | Most of these costs were recorded in General and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). |
The unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock and performance units was $5.8 million at March 31, 2011, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years. The unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options was $1.4 million at March 31, 2011, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years.
Clawback for Financial Reporting Misconduct
Effective February 23, 2011, in accordance with our Executive Compensation Recovery Policy and in addition to other remedies available to us, we may recover from current and former elected officers of the company in whole or in part any incentive payment, unvested equity award, or other compensation, including forfeiture of the awards or incentives, to the extent such incentive payment, equity award, or other compensation is or was based on any financial result or operating metric affected by participants who knowingly are or were fraudulent, engaged in illegal activities, or engaged in other wrongful conduct, including gross negligence, determined to be detrimental to us.
15. New and Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-29, Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. This ASU addresses diversity in practice about the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations. The ASU states that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable
20
prior annual reporting period only. In addition, the ASU expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2011, and the adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. See Note 2, Acquisition of Tharco Packaging, Inc., for our pro forma disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU amends FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to require reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements, including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The ASU also clarifies existing fair value measurement disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2010, and the adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. The detailed Level 3 roll-forward disclosures were effective January 1, 2011. The level 3 roll-forward disclosures did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
There were no other accounting standards recently issued that had or are expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
16. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes the following (dollars in thousands):
Boise Inc. | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18,694 | $ | (12,685 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
| 259 | ||||||
Unfunded accumulated benefit obligation |
855 | 264 | ||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on short-term investments |
(21 | ) | 3 | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 19,528 | $ | (12,159 | ) | |||
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18,694 | $ | (11,849 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
| 259 | ||||||
Unfunded accumulated benefit obligation |
855 | 264 | ||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on short-term investments |
(21 | ) | 3 | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 19,528 | $ | (11,323 | ) | |||
There are no differences in our basis of segmentation or in our basis of measurement of segment profit or loss from those disclosed in Note 18, Segment Information, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in our 2010 Form 10-K. As discussed in Note 2, Acquisition of Tharco Packaging, Inc., during the three months ended March 31, 2011, we acquired $258.9 million of assets as part of the Tharco Acquisition. Tharco is now included in the Packaging segment. Segment operating results for Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate are identical for all periods presented. For differences in interest expense and income tax provision (benefit), see the reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA below.
21
An analysis of operations by segment is as follows (dollars in millions):
Sales | Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion |
EBITDA (c) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | Trade | Related Parties |
Inter- segment |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paper |
$ | 358.7 | $ | | $ | 16.5 | $ | 375.2 | $ | 41.0 | $ | 22.1 | $ | 63.0 | ||||||||||||||
Packaging |
194.5 | 8.4 | 0.5 | 203.4 | 13.6 | (a) | 11.0 | 24.6 | (a) | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and Other |
7.2 | | 8.9 | 16.1 | (6.3 | ) | 0.9 | (5.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
560.4 | 8.4 | 25.9 | 594.7 | 48.3 | 34.0 | 82.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment eliminations |
| | (25.9 | ) | (25.9 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | (16.4 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| | | | 0.1 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 560.4 | $ | 8.4 | $ | | $ | 568.8 | $ | 32.0 | $ | 34.0 | $ | 82.2 | |||||||||||||||
Sales | Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion |
EBITDA (c) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | Trade | Related Parties |
Inter- segment |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paper |
$ | 339.3 | $ | | $ | 14.2 | $ | 353.5 | $ | 29.9 | (b) | $ | 21.5 | $ | 51.4 | (b) | ||||||||||||
Packaging |
141.9 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 148.2 | (5.8 | )(b) | 9.7 | 3.9 | (b) | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and Other |
4.7 | 2.6 | 9.2 | 16.5 | (4.8 | )(b) | 0.9 | (3.8 | )(b) | |||||||||||||||||||
485.9 | 8.2 | 24.1 | 518.2 | 19.3 | 32.1 | 51.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment eliminations |
| | (24.1 | ) | (24.1 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | | | (22.2 | )(b) | | (22.2 | )(b) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | (16.5 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 485.9 | $ | 8.2 | $ | | $ | 494.1 | $ | (19.3 | ) | $ | 32.1 | $ | 29.3 | ||||||||||||||
(a) | Included $2.2 million of expense related to inventory purchase price accounting adjustments. |
(b) | Included $3.3 million of expense related to the change in fair value of energy hedges, of which $2.8 million was recorded in the Paper segment and $0.5 million was recorded in the Packaging segment. |
Included $22.2 million of noncash expense recorded in the Corporate and Other segment associated with the refinancing of our debt.
(c) | EBITDA represents income (loss) before interest (interest expense and interest income), income tax provision (benefit), and depreciation, amortization, and depletion. EBITDA is the primary measure used by our chief operating decision makers to evaluate segment operating performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments. We believe EBITDA is useful to investors because it provides a means to evaluate the operating performance of our segments and our company on an ongoing basis using criteria that are used by our internal decision makers and because it is frequently used by investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies with substantial financial leverage. We believe EBITDA is a meaningful measure because it presents a transparent view of our recurring operating performance and allows management to readily view operating trends, perform analytical comparisons, and identify strategies to improve operating performance. For example, we believe that the inclusion of items such as taxes, interest expense, and interest income distorts managements ability to assess and view the core operating trends in our segments. EBITDA, however, is not a measure of our liquidity or financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), income (loss) from operations, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity. The use of EBITDA instead of net income (loss) or segment income (loss) has limitations as an analytical tool, including the inability to determine profitability; the exclusion of interest expense, interest income, and associated significant cash requirements; and the exclusion of depreciation, amortization, and depletion, which represent significant and unavoidable operating costs, given the level of our indebtedness and the capital expenditures needed to maintain our businesses. Management compensates for these limitations by relying on our GAAP results. Our measures of EBITDA are not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation. |
22
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA (dollars in millions):
Boise Inc. | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18.7 | $ | (12.7 | ) | |||
Interest expense |
16.4 | 16.5 | ||||||
Interest income |
(0.1 | ) | | |||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
13.3 | (6.6 | ) | |||||
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion |
34.0 | 32.1 | ||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 82.2 | $ | 29.3 | ||||
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18.7 | $ | (11.8 | ) | |||
Interest expense |
16.4 | 16.5 | ||||||
Interest income |
(0.1 | ) | | |||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
13.3 | (7.5 | ) | |||||
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion |
34.0 | 32.1 | ||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 82.2 | $ | 29.3 | ||||
18. Commitments, Guarantees, and Legal Proceedings
Commitments
We have financial commitments for leases and long-term debt that are disclosed in Note 6, Leases, and Note 11, Debt. We are party to a number of wood fiber and utilities contracts that are discussed in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in our 2010 Form 10-K. In addition, we have other financial obligations that we enter into in the normal course of our business to purchase goods and services and to make capital improvements to our facilities. At March 31, 2011, there have been no material changes to our commitments outside of the normal course of business, except as disclosed in Note 2, Acquisition of Tharco Packaging, Inc., and Note 11, Debt.
Guarantees
We provide guarantees, indemnifications, and assurances to others in the normal course of our business. See Note 11, Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in our 2010 Form 10-K for a description of the guarantees, including the approximate terms of the guarantees, how the guarantees arose, the events or circumstances that would require us to perform under the guarantees, and the maximum potential undiscounted amounts of future payments we could be required to make.
Legal Proceedings
We are a party to routine proceedings that arise in the course of our business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings or environmental claims that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity, either individually or in the aggregate.
On April 20, 2011, we announced a special cash dividend of $0.40 per common share, payable May 13, 2011, to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 4, 2011. Based on the shares outstanding at March 31, 2011, and assuming all warrants were exercised before the dividend record date, the dividend payment will be approximately $50 million. As of the end of April, a majority of the warrants had been exercised.
20. Consolidating Guarantor and Nonguarantor Financial Information
Our 9% and 8% senior notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by BZ Intermediate and each of its existing and future subsidiaries (other than: (i) the co-issuers, Boise
23
Paper Holdings, Boise Co-Issuer Company, and Boise Finance Company; (ii) Louisiana Timber Procurement Company, L.L.C.; and (iii) our foreign subsidiaries). The following consolidating financial statements present the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows of (i) BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (parent); (ii) co-issuers; (iii) guarantor subsidiaries; (iv) nonguarantor subsidiaries; and (v) eliminations to arrive at the information on a consolidated basis. Other than the consolidated financial statements and footnotes for Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate, financial statements and other disclosures concerning the guarantors have not been presented, because management believes that such information is not material to investors.
24
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Consolidating Statements of Income (Loss)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (Parent) |
Co-issuers | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade |
$ | | $ | 3,581 | $ | 555,457 | $ | 1,282 | $ | | $ | 560,320 | ||||||||||||
Intercompany |
| | | 22,339 | (22,339 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Related parties |
| | | 8,443 | | 8,443 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3,581 | 555,457 | 32,064 | (22,339 | ) | 568,763 | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Materials, labor, and other operating expenses |
| 3,408 | 435,936 | 32,065 | (22,339 | ) | 449,070 | |||||||||||||||||
Fiber costs from related parties |
| | 4,440 | | | 4,440 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion |
| 803 | 33,171 | | | 33,974 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling and distribution expenses |
| | 19,270 | 103 | | 19,373 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| 5,494 | 7,203 | | | 12,697 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
| 885 | 302 | (110 | ) | | 1,077 | |||||||||||||||||
| 10,590 | 500,322 | 32,058 | (22,339 | ) | 520,631 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
| (7,009 | ) | 55,135 | 6 | | 48,132 | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
| 140 | (8 | ) | | | 132 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| (16,310 | ) | (57 | ) | | | (16,367 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Interest expenseintercompany |
| (44 | ) | | (3 | ) | 47 | | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| 76 | 2 | | | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest incomeintercompany |
| 3 | 44 | | (47 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
| (16,135 | ) | (19 | ) | (3 | ) | | (16,157 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net income (loss) of affiliates |
| (23,144 | ) | 55,116 | 3 | | 31,975 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
| (13,233 | ) | (48 | ) | | | (13,281 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before equity in net income (loss) of affiliates |
| (36,377 | ) | 55,068 | 3 | | 18,694 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates |
18,694 | 55,071 | | | (73,765 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18,694 | $ | 18,694 | $ | 55,068 | $ | 3 | $ | (73,765 | ) | $ | 18,694 | |||||||||||
25
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Consolidating Statements of Income (Loss)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (Parent) |
Co-issuers | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade |
$ | | $ | 1,214 | $ | 483,445 | $ | 1,192 | $ | | $ | 485,851 | ||||||||||||
Intercompany |
| | | 26,763 | (26,763 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Related parties |
| 2,364 | 332 | 5,558 | | 8,254 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3,578 | 483,777 | 33,513 | (26,763 | ) | 494,105 | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Materials, labor, and other operating expenses |
| 3,432 | 398,303 | 33,513 | (26,763 | ) | 408,485 | |||||||||||||||||
Fiber costs from related parties |
| | 9,831 | | | 9,831 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion |
| 824 | 31,307 | | | 32,131 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling and distribution expenses |
| | 13,680 | 54 | | 13,734 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| 5,314 | 6,145 | | | 11,459 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
| 17 | (162 | ) | (30 | ) | | (175 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| 9,587 | 459,104 | 33,537 | (26,763 | ) | 475,465 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
| (6,009 | ) | 24,673 | (24 | ) | | 18,640 | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange gain |
| 432 | 255 | | | 687 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| (22,197 | ) | | | | (22,197 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| (16,474 | ) | | | | (16,474 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expenseintercompany |
| (49 | ) | | (4 | ) | 53 | | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| 35 | 2 | | | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest incomeintercompany |
| 4 | 49 | | (53 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
| (38,249 | ) | 306 | (4 | ) | | (37,947 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net income (loss) of affiliates |
| (44,258 | ) | 24,979 | (28 | ) | | (19,307 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income tax (provision) benefit |
| 7,496 | (38 | ) | | | 7,458 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before equity in net income (loss) of affiliates |
| (36,762 | ) | 24,941 | (28 | ) | | (11,849 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates |
(11,849 | ) | 24,913 | | | (13,064 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (11,849 | ) | $ | (11,849 | ) | $ | 24,941 | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (13,064 | ) | $ | (11,849 | ) | |||||||
26
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Consolidating Balance Sheets at March 31, 2011
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (Parent) |
Co-issuers | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 55,771 | $ | 4,069 | $ | 296 | $ | | $ | 60,136 | ||||||||||||
Receivables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade, less allowances |
| 1,236 | 221,418 | 1,006 | | 223,660 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
| | 47 | 1,486 | (1,533 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 3,814 | 5,023 | 4 | | 8,841 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 14 | 278,006 | | | 278,020 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 18,482 | | 8 | | 18,490 | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid and other |
| 8,065 | 696 | 8 | | 8,769 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 87,382 | 509,259 | 2,808 | (1,533 | ) | 597,916 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 5,999 | 1,212,631 | | | 1,218,630 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fiber farms and deposits |
| | 18,505 | | | 18,505 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 5,999 | 1,231,136 | | | 1,237,135 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs |
| 29,042 | | | | 29,042 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| | 101,258 | | | 101,258 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
| | 104,225 | | | 104,225 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments in affiliates |
675,477 | 1,676,633 | | | (2,352,110 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 5,371 | 3,417 | | | 8,788 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 675,477 | $ | 1,804,427 | $ | 1,949,295 | $ | 2,808 | $ | (2,353,643 | ) | $ | 2,078,364 | |||||||||||
27
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Consolidating Balance Sheets at March 31, 2011 (continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (Parent) |
Co-issuers | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | | $ | 50,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 50,000 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
| (622 | ) | 898 | 2 | | 278 | |||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade |
| 9,971 | 173,616 | 2,609 | | 186,196 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
| | 1,486 | 47 | (1,533 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
| 16,946 | 31,926 | | | 48,872 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest payable |
| 23,271 | | | | 23,271 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 2,187 | 15,474 | 132 | | 17,793 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 101,753 | 223,400 | 2,790 | (1,533 | ) | 326,410 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
| 780,581 | | | | 780,581 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 93,070 | 34,145 | | | 127,215 | ||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
| 120,719 | 166 | | | 120,885 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 32,827 | 14,969 | | | 47,796 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 246,616 | 49,280 | | | 295,896 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commitments and contingent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business unit equity |
675,477 | 675,477 | 1,676,615 | 18 | (2,352,110 | ) | 675,477 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and capital |
$ | 675,477 | $ | 1,804,427 | $ | 1,949,295 | $ | 2,808 | $ | (2,353,643 | ) | $ | 2,078,364 | |||||||||||
28
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Consolidating Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (Parent) |
Co-issuers | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 166,410 | $ | 6 | $ | 417 | $ | | $ | 166,833 | ||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
| 10,621 | | | | 10,621 | ||||||||||||||||||
Receivables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade, less allowances |
| 1,004 | 187,502 | 83 | | 188,589 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
| | 2 | 1,634 | (1,636 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 331 | 3,504 | 4 | | 3,839 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 15 | 261,456 | | | 261,471 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 16,651 | | 7 | | 16,658 | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid and other |
| 4,697 | 517 | | | 5,214 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 199,729 | 452,987 | 2,145 | (1,636 | ) | 653,225 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 5,952 | 1,193,083 | | | 1,199,035 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fiber farms and deposits |
| | 18,285 | | | 18,285 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 5,952 | 1,211,368 | | | 1,217,320 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs |
| 30,396 | | | | 30,396 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
| | 29,605 | | | 29,605 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments in affiliates |
655,332 | 1,479,253 | | | (2,134,585 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 5,175 | 3,269 | | | 8,444 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 655,332 | $ | 1,720,505 | $ | 1,697,229 | $ | 2,145 | $ | (2,136,221 | ) | $ | 1,938,990 | |||||||||||
29
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Consolidating Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 (continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (Parent) |
Co-issuers | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | | $ | 43,750 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 43,750 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
| (818 | ) | 898 | 2 | | 82 | |||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade |
| 13,513 | 163,710 | 1,991 | | 179,214 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
| 2 | 1,634 | | (1,636 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
| 23,081 | 31,493 | | | 54,574 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest payable |
| 10,535 | | | | 10,535 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 5,336 | 10,645 | 142 | | 16,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 95,399 | 208,380 | 2,135 | (1,636 | ) | 304,278 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
| 738,081 | | | | 738,081 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 78,959 | 492 | | | 79,451 | ||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
| 121,318 | | | | 121,318 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 31,416 | 9,114 | | | 40,530 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 231,693 | 9,606 | | | 241,299 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commitments and contingent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business unit equity |
655,332 | 655,332 | 1,479,243 | 10 | (2,134,585 | ) | 655,332 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and capital |
$ | 655,332 | $ | 1,720,505 | $ | 1,697,229 | $ | 2,145 | $ | (2,136,221 | ) | $ | 1,938,990 | |||||||||||
30
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (Parent) |
Co-issuers | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18,694 | $ | 18,694 | $ | 55,068 | $ | 3 | $ | (73,765 | ) | $ | 18,694 | |||||||||||
Items in net income (loss) not using (providing) cash |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates |
(18,694 | ) | (55,071 | ) | | | 73,765 | | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of deferred financing costs and other |
| 2,368 | 33,171 | | | 35,539 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
| 648 | | | | 648 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pension expense |
| 3,169 | | | | 3,169 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 11,420 | | | | 11,420 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of energy derivatives |
| | (742 | ) | | | (742 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sales of assets, net |
| 17 | 261 | | | 278 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| (140 | ) | 1,769 | | | 1,629 | |||||||||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in working capital, net of acquisitions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables |
| (3,714 | ) | (3,768 | ) | (776 | ) | (103 | ) | (8,361 | ) | |||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 1 | 2,378 | | | 2,379 | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
| (1,900 | ) | 1,330 | (8 | ) | | (578 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
| 506 | (6,745 | ) | 655 | 103 | (5,481 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Current and deferred income taxes |
| 1,634 | | | | 1,634 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pension payments |
| (3,370 | ) | | | | (3,370 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 976 | 4,416 | | | 5,392 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) operations |
| (24,762 | ) | 87,138 | (126 | ) | | 62,250 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) investment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions of businesses and facilities, net of cash acquired |
| | (201,734 | ) | | | (201,734 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Expenditures for property and equipment |
| (835 | ) | (23,815 | ) | | | (24,650 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
| (3,514 | ) | | | | (3,514 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Maturities of short-term investments |
| 14,114 | | | | 14,114 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales of assets |
| | 1,088 | | | 1,088 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 139 | (918 | ) | | | (779 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) investment |
| 9,904 | (225,379 | ) | | | (215,475 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) financing |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuances of long-term debt |
| 75,000 | | | | 75,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Payments of long-term debt |
| (26,250 | ) | | | | (26,250 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
| (160 | ) | | | | (160 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Payments (to) from Boise Inc., net |
(62 | ) | | | | | (62 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Due to (from) affiliates |
62 | (142,371 | ) | 142,304 | 5 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
| (2,000 | ) | | | | (2,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) financing |
| (95,781 | ) | 142,304 | 5 | | 46,528 | |||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
| (110,639 | ) | 4,063 | (121 | ) | | (106,697 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of the period |
| 166,410 | 6 | 417 | | 166,833 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of the period |
$ | | $ | 55,771 | $ | 4,069 | $ | 296 | $ | | $ | 60,136 | ||||||||||||
31
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (Parent) |
Co-issuers | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (11,849 | ) | $ | (11,849 | ) | $ | 24,941 | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (13,064 | ) | $ | (11,849 | ) | |||||||
Items in net income (loss) not using (providing) cash |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates |
11,849 | (24,913 | ) | | | 13,064 | | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of deferred financing costs and other |
| 3,759 | 31,307 | | | 35,066 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
| 894 | | | | 894 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pension expense |
| 2,568 | | | | 2,568 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| (7,461 | ) | | | | (7,461 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of energy derivatives |
| | 3,330 | | | 3,330 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sales of assets, net |
| | (114 | ) | | | (114 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
| (403 | ) | (255 | ) | | | (658 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 22,197 | | | | 22,197 | ||||||||||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in working capital |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables |
| (576 | ) | 79,650 | (3,494 | ) | (17,367 | ) | 58,213 | |||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 1 | (16,086 | ) | | | (16,085 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
| (1,697 | ) | 2,092 | (6 | ) | | 389 | ||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
| (3,826 | ) | (30,064 | ) | 3,466 | 17,367 | (13,057 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Current and deferred income taxes |
| (43 | ) | 38 | | | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Pension payments |
| (5,689 | ) | | | | (5,689 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 479 | (256 | ) | | | 223 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) operations |
| (26,559 | ) | 94,583 | (62 | ) | | 67,962 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) investment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenditures for property and equipment |
| (954 | ) | (13,780 | ) | | | (14,734 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
| (2,388 | ) | | | | (2,388 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Maturities of short-term investments |
| 5,182 | | | | 5,182 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales of assets |
| | 22 | | | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 429 | 664 | | | 1,093 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) investment |
| 2,269 | (13,094 | ) | | | (10,825 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) financing |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuances of long-term debt |
| 300,000 | | | | 300,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Payments of long-term debt |
| (323,683 | ) | | | | (323,683 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
| (11,779 | ) | | | | (11,779 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Due to (from) affiliates |
| 81,481 | (81,516 | ) | 35 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) financing |
| 46,019 | (81,516 | ) | 35 | | (35,462 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
| 21,729 | (27 | ) | (27 | ) | | 21,675 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of the period |
| 69,071 | 33 | 289 | | 69,393 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of the period |
$ | | $ | 90,800 | $ | 6 | $ | 262 | $ | | $ | 91,068 | ||||||||||||
32
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This discussion and analysis includes statements regarding our expectations with respect to our future performance, liquidity, and capital resources. Such statements, along with any other nonhistorical statements in the discussion, are forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as those factors listed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Except where otherwise indicated, this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is provided with respect to Boise Inc., which has materially the same financial condition and results of operations as BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (BZ Intermediate) except for income taxes. We do not assume an obligation to update any forward-looking statement. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any of the forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q.
In this filing, unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms Company, we, us, our, or Boise refer to Boise Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including BZ Intermediate. Boise Inc. is a large, diverse United States-based manufacturer of paper and packaging products, headquartered in Boise, Idaho. Our operations began on February 22, 2008, when entities controlled by Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C. (Boise Cascade) sold their paper and packaging assets. We operate and report our results in three reportable segments: Paper, Packaging, and Corporate and Other (support services). See Note 17, Segment Information, of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for more information related to our segments.
On March 1, 2011, our wholly owned subsidiary Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C. (Boise Paper Holdings) acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Tharco Packaging, Inc. (Tharco) for a preliminary purchase price of $201.1 million plus or minus working capital adjustments (the Tharco Acquisition). We financed the acquisition with existing cash and $75 million in borrowings on our revolving credit facility, which is discussed further in Liquidity and Capital Resources in this Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The acquisition expands and diversifies our presence in packaging markets; extends our geographical reach from the Pacific Northwest to California, Colorado, Arizona, and Georgia; and will increase our containerboard integration from approximately 70% to approximately 85%.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, sales increased 15% to $568.8 million, from the $494.1 million reported during the same period in 2010. Of the 15% increase in sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011, 5% related to Tharcos results for the one-month period ended March 31, 2011. Net income totaled $18.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with a $12.7 million loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Excluding the special items disclosed in the table below, net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was $20.0 million, compared with $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in net income before special items was due primarily to increased net sales prices and, to a lesser extent, lower energy costs in both the Paper and Packaging segments, offset partially by increased chemical costs. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, net selling prices of uncoated freesheet papers and segment linerboard improved $48 and $128 per short ton, compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010, as we benefited from price increases implemented during 2010.
U.S. industry demand for uncoated freesheet paper declined for the first three months of 2011, compared with the first three months in 2010. According to the American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA), as of March 2011, U.S. industry shipments were down 2.8%, compared with the same period in 2010. 2011 year-to-date industry operating rates, measured as total uncoated freesheet paper shipments in the U.S. as a percentage of total capacity, were at 91%. Demand for commodity communication papers has been negatively affected by weak macroeconomic conditions and elevated unemployment and continues to be negatively affected by the secular shift to electronic media for communications. The long-term demand for printing and converting products has also been negatively affected by weak macroeconomic conditions and by the decline in direct-mail advertising. Declines in
33
demand have been mitigated by significant reductions in uncoated freesheet paper industry capacity in recent years. Compared with prior years, U.S. uncoated freesheet paper inventories remained very low at approximately 887,000 short tons in March 2011, compared with 913,000 and 901,000 short tons in December 2010 and March 2010, respectively.
U.S. industry containerboard demand improved in first quarter 2011. Industry box shipments in the U.S. increased 2.0% through March 2011, compared with the same period in 2010, and year-to-date industry operating rates through March 2011, measured as total production in the U.S. as a percentage of total capacity, were at 94%, according to the AF&PA. Total U.S. containerboard inventories were 2.3 million short tons in March 2011, an increase compared with 2.1 million short tons in March 2010, and flat compared with December 2010.
Packaging demand in our agriculture, food, and beverage markets, which has historically been less correlated to broad economic activity, improved in first quarter 2011, compared with first quarter 2010. These markets constitute just over half of our corrugated product end-use markets. Demand in our industrial markets and containerboard export markets is more closely aligned with general economic activity and showed improvement during first quarter 2011, compared with first quarter 2010.
Compared with first quarter 2010, prices for some key commodity chemicals increased. Diesel prices also increased, which increases freight costs on both inbound raw materials and outbound finished goods. Prices for fuel, particularly natural gas, declined, compared with first quarter 2010. Fiber costs increased modestly in first quarter 2011, compared with 2010, with higher fiber prices offset partially by lower fiber consumption.
During first quarter 2011, we performed a scheduled annual maintenance outage at the DeRidder, Louisiana, mill in our Packaging segment. During second quarter 2011, we have additional maintenance work scheduled at our DeRidder mill. We also have our scheduled annual maintenance outages at the International Falls, Minnesota, and Wallula, Washington, mills in our Paper segment during second quarter 2011.
Looking ahead, our focus will be to integrate Tharcos operations with ours and continue to pursue growth opportunities in our Packaging segment to improve our competitive position. We expect continued growth in our premium office, label and release, and flexible packaging papers, offsetting declining demand in commodity paper markets. Through first quarter 2011, we have seen indications of rising input costs, including increased prices for chemicals and diesel, which we expect to persist throughout 2011. We continue to monitor regulatory and competitive developments across the industry, including the Boiler MACT legislation, to determine potential impacts on our businesses.
The following table sets forth our financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in millions, except per-share data):
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Sales |
$ | 568.8 | $ | 494.1 | ||||
Net income (loss) |
18.7 | (12.7 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) per diluted share |
0.21 | (0.16 | ) | |||||
Net income excluding special items |
20.0 | 3.0 | ||||||
Net income excluding special items per diluted share |
0.22 | 0.04 | ||||||
EBITDA |
82.2 | 29.3 | ||||||
EBITDA excluding special items |
84.4 | 54.9 |
Net income excluding special items, net income excluding special items per diluted share, EBITDA, and EBITDA excluding special items are not measures under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). EBITDA represents income (loss) before interest (interest expense and interest income), income taxes, and depreciation, amortization, and depletion. EBITDA is the primary measure used by our chief operating decision makers to evaluate segment operating performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments. We believe EBITDA is useful to investors because it provides a means to evaluate the operating performance of our segments and our company on an ongoing basis using criteria that are used by our internal decision makers and because it is frequently used by investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies. EBITDA excluding special items and net income excluding special items represent EBITDA and net income (loss) adjusted by eliminating items that we believe are not consistent with our ongoing operations. The Company uses
34
these measures to focus on ongoing operations and believes they are useful to investors because these measures enable meaningful comparisons of past and present operating results.
The Company believes that using this information, along with their comparable GAAP measures, provides for a more complete analysis of the results of operations. The following table provides a reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA, and EBITDA to EBITDA excluding special items for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in millions):
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18.7 | $ | (12.7 | ) | |||||||
Interest expense |
16.4 | 16.5 | ||||||||||
Interest income |
(0.1 | ) | | |||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
13.3 | (6.6 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion |
34.0 | 32.1 | ||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 82.2 | $ | 29.3 | ||||||||
Inventory purchase accounting expense |
$ | 2.2 | $ | | ||||||||
St. Helens mill restructuring |
| 0.1 | ||||||||||
Change in fair value of energy hedges |
| 3.3 | ||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 22.2 | ||||||||||
EBITDA excluding special items |
$ | 84.4 | $ | 54.9 | ||||||||
The following table reconciles net income (loss) to net income excluding special items and presents net income excluding special items per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in millions and shares in thousands, except per-share data):
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 18.7 | $ | (12.7 | ) | |||
Inventory purchase accounting expense |
2.2 | | ||||||
St. Helens mill restructuring |
| 0.1 | ||||||
Change in fair value of energy hedges |
| 3.3 | ||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 22.2 | ||||||
Tax provision for special items (a) |
(0.9 | ) | (9.9 | ) | ||||
Net income excluding special items |
$ | 20.0 | $ | 3.0 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: diluted |
90,417 | 84,195 | ||||||
Net income excluding special items per diluted share |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.04 |
(a) | Special items are tax effected in the aggregate at an assumed combined federal and state statutory rate of 38.7%. |
Factors That Affect Our Operating Results
Our results of operations and financial performance are influenced by a variety of factors, including the following:
| Labor and personnel relations. |
| General economic conditions, including but not limited to durable and nondurable goods production, white-collar employment, electronic substitution, and relative currency values. |
| Legislative or regulatory environments, requirements, or changes affecting the businesses in which we are engaged. |
| Competing technologies that affect the demand for our products. |
| The commodity nature of our products and their price movements, which are driven largely by supply and demand. |
35
| Availability and affordability of raw materials, including wood fiber, energy, and chemicals. |
| The ability of our lenders, customers, and suppliers to continue to conduct their businesses. |
| Our customer concentration and the ability of our customers to pay. |
| Pension funding requirements. |
| Credit or currency risks affecting our revenue and profitability. |
| Major equipment failure. |
| Severe weather phenomena such as drought, hurricanes and significant rainfall, tornadoes, and fire. |
| The other factors described in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
Demand
The overall level of demand for the products we make and distribute is affected by, among other things, employment, electronic media substitution, manufacturing activity, consumer spending, and currency exchange rates. Accordingly, we believe that our financial results depend in large part on general macroeconomic conditions in North America, as well as on regional economic conditions in the geographic markets in which we operate. While extended high unemployment levels or a second economic downturn could negatively affect overall demand, no single product line drives our overall financial performance, and individual product lines are influenced by conditions in their respective industries. For example:
| Historically, demand for uncoated freesheet papers correlated positively with general economic activity. However, demand for communication paper grades, such as imaging and printing and converting papers, which we produce, has decreased as the use of electronic transmission and document storage alternatives has become more widespread and more efficient. |
| Demand for recycled-content papers is linked to an increased public awareness of environmental and sustainability issues and is less sensitive to general economic activity. We produce grades that contain from 10% to 100% recycled content. |
| Demand for our packaging products, including corrugated containers and sheets, containerboard, label and release, and flexible packaging papers, is driven by packaging demand. This demand is affected by macroeconomic conditions. |
| A large share of the demand for corrugated containers and, therefore, containerboard is driven by unprocessed and processed food production and manufacturing, specifically the manufacture of nondurable goods. Inventory levels and currency exchange rates also affect import and export volumes and influence demand for corrugated containers. |
Supply
Industry supply of paper is affected by the number of operational or idled facilities, the building of new capacity, and the shutting down of existing capacity. Capacity also tends to increase gradually over time without significant capital expenditures as manufacturers improve production efficiencies. Generally, more capacity is added or employed when supply is tight and margins are relatively high, and capacity is idled or eliminated when capacity significantly exceeds demand and margins are poor.
From 2005 to 2010, North American uncoated freesheet paper, containerboard, and newsprint capacities declined approximately 24%, 4%, and 39%, respectively, according to Resource Information Systems Inc. (RISI). New capacity additions are constrained by the high capital investment and long lead times required to plan, obtain regulatory approvals for, and build a new mill.
36
Industry supply of paper is also influenced by the level of imports, relative currency values, and overseas production capacity, which has grown over the past decade. According to the AF&PA, U.S. uncoated freesheet paper imports decreased through February 2011, compared with the same period in 2010.
Operating Costs
The major costs of production are fiber, energy, chemicals, and labor. The relative size of these costs varies by segment. Given the significance of raw material and energy costs to total operating expenses and the limited ability to control these costs, compared with other operating costs, volatility in these costs can materially affect operating margins. In addition, the timing and degree of price cycles of raw materials and energy differ with respect to each type of raw material and energy used.
Fiber. The primary raw material is wood fiber in various forms, accounting for the following percentages of materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including related-party fiber costs, for each of the periods listed below:
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Paper |
29 | % | 32 | % | ||||
Packaging |
18 | % | 17 | % |
The primary sources of logs and wood fiber are timber and byproducts of timber, such as wood chips, wood shavings, and sawdust. Substantially all fiber is acquired from outside sources. We convert logs and wood chips into pulp, which we use at our paper mills to produce paper. On an aggregate basis, operating at capacity, we are a net consumer of market pulp, producing and selling less market pulp on the open market than we purchase on the open market. The net market pulp consumed is a relatively small portion of our overall fiber needs.
Logs and wood fiber are commodities, and prices for logs and wood fiber have historically been cyclical due to changing levels of supply and demand. Log and wood fiber supply may be limited by public policy or government regulation as well as fire, insect infestation, disease, ice storms, windstorms, hurricanes, flooding, other weather conditions, and other natural and man-made causes. Residual fiber supply may be limited due to a reduction in primary manufacturing at sawmills and plywood plants. Declines in demand for logs and wood fiber have been severe enough to cause the closure of numerous facilities in some of the regions in which we operate. In addition, new or proposed regulations related to the production and use of biofuel may increase the competition for wood fiber in a number of operating regions. Any sustained undersupply and resulting increase in wood fiber prices could decrease our production volumes and/or increase our operating costs. Prices for our products might not reflect increases or decreases in log and wood fiber prices, and as a result, our operating margins could fluctuate. Delivered-fiber costs in all of our operating regions include the cost of diesel, which increased in first quarter 2011, compared with first quarter 2010. Higher diesel costs increase the cost to harvest and transport wood to the mills, unfavorably affecting fiber costs in all of our regions.
In Minnesota, our overall fiber costs decreased in first quarter 2011, compared with first quarter 2010, driven by reduced consumption of fiber as a result of reduced production volumes. This was offset partially by higher purchased pulp and wood fiber prices, compared with first quarter 2010.
In the Pacific Northwest, our fiber costs increased in first quarter 2011, compared with first quarter 2010, as a result of higher prices for wood fiber and species mix changes. Higher prices for purchased pulp at our St. Helens, Oregon, mill also contributed.
Compared with first quarter 2010, total fiber costs at our DeRidder mill decreased, due to lower consumption of and prices for wood fiber. In Alabama, fiber costs decreased in first quarter 2011, compared with first quarter 2010, driven by lower wood prices and consumption of purchased pulp. During first quarter 2010, fiber costs in the region were negatively affected by wet weather in the region.
Other Raw Materials and Energy Purchasing and Pricing. We purchase other raw materials and energy used to manufacture our products in both the open market and through long-term contracts. These contracts are generally with regional suppliers who agree to supply all of our needs for a certain raw material or energy at a single facility. These contracts frequently contain minimum purchase requirements and are for terms of various lengths. They also contain price adjustment mechanisms that take into account changes in market prices. Therefore, although our long-term contracts provide us with
37
supplies of raw materials and energy that are more stable than open-market purchases, they may not, in many cases, alleviate fluctuations in market prices.
Our costs for raw materials are influenced by increases in energy costs. Specifically, some of our key chemicals, including pulping and bleaching chemicals consumed in our paper and packaging mills, are heavily influenced by energy costs. The relationship between industry supply and demand, rather than changes in the cost of raw materials, determines our ability to increase prices. Consequently, we may be unable to pass increases in our operating costs to our customers in the short term.
Energy. Energy prices, particularly for electricity, natural gas, and fuel oil, have been volatile in recent years. Currently, energy prices are favorable, compared with historical averages. In first quarter 2011, energy costs were lower, compared with first quarter 2010, due mainly to the decreased consumption and price of natural gas, offset partially by increased consumption of electricity. Under normal operations, we expect to consume approximately 12 million mmBtu (millions of British thermal units) of natural gas annually. Energy costs represent the following percentages of materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including fiber costs from related parties, in each of the periods listed below:
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Paper |
12 | % | 15 | % | ||||
Packaging |
10 | % | 14 | % |
We may enter into transactions to hedge the variable cash flow risk of natural gas purchases. For more information about our energy derivative instruments, see Note 12, Financial Instruments, of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
Chemicals. Important chemicals we use in the production of our products include starch, sodium chlorate, caustic, precipitated calcium carbonate, and dyestuffs and optical brighteners. Purchases of chemicals represent the following percentages of materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including fiber costs from related parties, for each of the periods listed below:
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Paper |
15 | % | 14 | % | ||||
Packaging |
6 | % | 5 | % |
Total chemical costs in first quarter 2011 were higher, compared with first quarter 2010, as a result of higher prices for some key commodity chemical inputs, such as caustic and starch. Many of our chemicals are purchased under contracts, which provide more stability than open-market purchases. These contracts are negotiated periodically at prevailing rates.
Labor. Labor costs tend to increase steadily due to inflation in healthcare and wage costs. As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately 5,000 employees. Approximately 53% of these employees worked pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. In April 2011, our hourly employees at our DeRidder, Louisiana, mill approved a new collective bargaining agreement. Following the approval of this agreement, approximately 36% of our employees are now working pursuant to collective bargaining agreements that have expired or will expire within one year.
38
The following table sets forth our operating results in dollars and as a percentage of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in millions, except percent-of-sales data):
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 (1) | 2010 | |||||||
Sales |
||||||||
Trade |
$ | 560.4 | $ | 485.9 | ||||
Related parties |
8.4 | 8.2 | ||||||
568.8 | 494.1 | |||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||
Materials, labor, and other operating expenses |
449.1 | 408.5 | ||||||
Fiber costs from related parties |
4.4 | 9.8 | ||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion |
34.0 | 32.1 | ||||||
Selling and distribution expenses |
19.3 | 13.7 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
12.7 | 11.6 | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
1.1 | (0.2 | ) | |||||
520.6 | 475.5 | |||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 48.1 | $ | 18.6 | ||||
Sales |
||||||||
Trade |
98.5 | % | 98.3 | % | ||||
Related parties |
1.5 | 1.7 | ||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||
Materials, labor, and other operating expenses |
79.0 | % | 82.7 | % | ||||
Fiber costs from related parties |
0.8 | 2.0 | ||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion |
6.0 | 6.5 | ||||||
Selling and distribution expenses |
3.4 | 2.8 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
2.2 | 2.3 | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
0.2 | (0.1 | ) | |||||
91.6 | % | 96.2 | % | |||||
Income from operations |
8.4 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||
(1) | The three months ended March 31, 2011, included one month of Tharcos financial results. For more information, see Note 2, Acquisition of Tharco Packaging, Inc., of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q. |
39
Sales Volumes and Prices
Set forth below are our segment sales volumes and average net selling prices for our principal products for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands of short tons and dollars per short ton, except corrugated containers and sheets):
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Sales Volumes |
||||||||
Paper |
||||||||
Uncoated freesheet |
311 | 312 | ||||||
Containerboard (medium) |
33 | 32 | ||||||
Market pulp |
22 | 18 | ||||||
366 | 362 | |||||||
Packaging |
||||||||
Containerboard (linerboard) |
62 | 62 | ||||||
Newsprint |
55 | 54 | ||||||
Corrugated containers and sheets (mmsf) (1) |
1,912 | 1,616 | ||||||
Sales Prices (2) |
||||||||
Paper |
||||||||
Uncoated freesheet |
$ | 989 | $ | 941 | ||||
Containerboard (medium) |
469 | 408 | ||||||
Market pulp |
603 | 496 | ||||||
Packaging |
||||||||
Containerboard (linerboard) |
$ | 424 | $ | 296 | ||||
Newsprint |
542 | 442 | ||||||
Corrugated containers and sheets ($/msf) |
63 | 53 |
(1) | The increase in corrugated containers and sheets sales volumes in 2011 is due to the inclusion of Tharcos operations from the acquisition date of March 1, 2011. |
(2) | Average net selling prices for our principal products represent sales less freight costs, discounts, and allowances. Segment revenues, as reported in Note 17, Segment Information, of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q include fees for shipping and handling charged to customers for sales transactions. |
Operating Results
The following presents a discussion of sales and costs for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with the same period in 2010.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011, Compared With the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Sales
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, total sales increased $74.7 million, or 15%, to $568.8 million from $494.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was driven primarily by higher sales prices in both the Paper and Packaging segments and the acquisition of Tharco, which increased sales in our Packaging segment, as further discussed below.
Paper. Sales increased $21.7 million, or 6%, to $375.2 million from $353.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was driven primarily by higher sales prices across all of our product lines. Overall uncoated freesheet net sales prices increased 5%, compared with the same period in 2010, as commodity uncoated freesheet net sales prices increased 4% and premium and specialty net sales prices increased 6%, compared with the prior-year period. Overall uncoated freesheet sales volumes were flat, compared with the prior-year period, as 4% growth in premium and specialty sales volumes was offset by a 3% decline in commodity sales volumes. Increased premium and specialty sales volumes were driven primarily by 6% growth in combined sales volumes of premium office, label and
40
release, and flexible packaging papers, which represented 31% of our total first quarter 2011 uncoated freesheet sales volumes.
Packaging. Sales increased $55.2 million, or 37%, to $203.4 million from $148.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. A large portion of the increase was the result of our acquisition of Tharco, which closed on March 1, 2011. Other drivers included a 43% increase in segment linerboard net selling prices, a 23% increase in newsprint net selling prices, and increased sales volumes of corrugated containers and sheets as a result of improved market conditions.
Costs and Expenses
Materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including the cost of fiber from related parties, increased $35.2 million to $453.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with $418.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was driven primarily by operating costs associated with Tharco, offset partially by lower overall input costs.
Fiber, energy, and chemical costs were $116.3 million, $52.8 million, and $54.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2011, and $115.5 million, $63.4 million, and $49.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. This represents a cost decrease of $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010. This decrease was driven primarily by lower energy costs, offset partially by increased prices for commodity chemicals.
Fiber costs decreased $5.6 million in our Paper segment and increased $6.4 million in our Packaging segment, compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010. Cost drivers included reduced consumption as a result of lower production volumes in our Paper segment and increased costs as a result of the acquisition of Tharco, offset partially by lower wood prices and consumption in our Packaging segment.
Compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010, energy costs decreased $8.3 million in our Paper segment and $2.3 million in our Packaging segment. This was due primarily to lower prices for and consumption of fuel, including natural gas, in both segments, offset partially by higher consumption of electricity.
Chemical costs increased $3.3 million in our Paper segment and $1.9 million in our Packaging segment, compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010, as a result of increased prices for commodity chemicals.
Labor costs related to the production of our products recorded in Materials, labor, and other operating expenses were $75.5 million in the first three months of 2011, an increase of $6.1 million, or 9%, compared with the same period in 2010. The first three months of 2011 included additional labor costs from our acquisition of Tharco. Labor costs are not as volatile as energy and wood fiber costs; however, they make up a significant component of our operating costs and tend to increase over time.
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was $34.0 million, compared with $32.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase related to incremental depreciation and amortization recorded in connection with the Tharco Acquisition.
Selling and distribution expenses increased $5.6 million to $19.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with $13.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase related primarily to additional selling and distribution costs from our acquisition of Tharco.
General and administrative expenses increased $1.1 million to $12.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with $11.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Excluding general and administrative costs related to Tharcos operations, these expenses were relatively flat, compared with the same period in the prior year.
Other (income) expense includes miscellaneous income and expense items. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we had $1.1 million of other expense, and for the three months ended March 31, 2010, we had $0.2 million of other income. The expense in 2011 included approximately $0.6 million of project costs related to the Tharco Acquisition.
41
Income From Operations
Income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011, increased $29.5 million to $48.1 million, compared with $18.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase was driven primarily by higher sales prices across the majority of our products, offset partially by increased chemical costs. Our operating segment results are discussed below. Income from operations also includes net costs from our Corporate and Other segment.
Paper. Segment income from operations increased $11.1 million to $41.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with $29.9 million of income for the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase was driven primarily by higher sales prices and lower energy costs, offset partially by higher chemical costs.
Packaging. Segment income from operations increased $19.4 million to $13.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with $5.8 million of loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase from operations was due primarily to higher prices for segment linerboard, newsprint, and corrugated products, offset partially by higher chemical costs. Increased sales volumes of corrugated containers and sheets also contributed.
Other
Loss on extinguishment of debt. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, loss on extinguishment of debt was $22.2 million. This amount consists primarily of previously unamortized deferred financing costs for our Tranche B term loan facility, which was paid off as part of our March 2010 debt refinancing.
Interest expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, interest expense was $16.4 million and $16.5 million, respectively, which includes interest on our debt obligations as well as the amortization of deferred financing costs and other.
Income taxes. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate recorded $13.3 million of income tax expense and had effective tax rates of 41.5%. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Boise Inc. recorded $6.6 million of income tax benefit and had an effective tax benefit rate of 34.3%. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, BZ Intermediate recorded $7.5 million of income tax benefit and had an effective tax benefit rate of 38.6%. During the prior year, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt that resulted in a net loss, and therefore, we recorded a tax benefit.
Tharco Acquisition
As part of the Tharco Acquisition, we increased our assets by approximately $258.9 million and our liabilities by approximately $57.7 million. See Note 2, Acquisition of Tharco Packaging, Inc., of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2011, we had $60.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, $830.6 million of total debt, and $186.9 million of aggregate liquidity from unused borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility, net of letters of credit. In first quarter 2011, we completed the Tharco Acquisition. Total preliminary net cash consideration (subject to final working capital and other adjustments) was $201.7 million, which we financed with existing cash and $75 million of borrowings on our revolving credit facility. For further information, see Note 2, Acquisition of Tharco Packaging, Inc., of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements. We invest our cash in high-quality, short-term investments. At March 31, 2011, 42.0 million warrants and 2.3 million insider warrants (for which we will receive no proceeds) were outstanding. The warrants expire on June 18, 2011. If all outstanding warrants were exercised at the $7.50 exercise price, we would receive cash proceeds of approximately $315 million.
On April 20, 2011, we announced a special cash dividend of $0.40 per common share, payable May 13, 2011, to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 4, 2011. Based on the shares outstanding at March 31, 2011, and assuming all warrants were exercised before the dividend record date, the dividend payment will be approximately $50 million. As of the end of April, a majority of the warrants had been exercised.
We believe that our cash as well as our cash flows from operations and the available borrowing capacity under our $250.0 million revolving credit facility will be adequate to provide cash as required to
42
support our ongoing operations, property and equipment expenditures, and debt service obligations for at least the next 12 months.
Sources and Uses of Cash
We generate cash from sales of our products and from short- and long-term borrowings, as well as from cash proceeds from the sale of nonstrategic assets. In addition to paying for ongoing operating costs, we use cash to invest in our business, repay debt, pay dividends, and meet our contractual obligations and commercial commitments. Below is a discussion of our sources and uses of cash through operating activities (including a sensitivity analysis related to our sources and uses of cash from/for operating activities), investing activities, and financing activities.
Operating Activities
We operate in a cyclical industry, and our operating cash flows vary accordingly. Our principal operating cash expenditures are for fiber, compensation, energy, chemicals, and interest. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, our operating activities provided $62.3 million and $68.0 million of cash, respectively. Compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010, the decrease in cash provided by operations relates primarily to the following:
| A $12.0 million increase in working capital, compared with $29.5 million of cash provided by decreases in working capital in the prior year. Working capital is subject to cyclical operating needs, the timing of the collection of receivables, the payment of payables and expenses, and to a lesser extent, seasonal fluctuations in our operations. Excluding the impact of the Tharco Acquisition, working capital increased during the three months ended March 31, 2011, due primarily to higher accounts receivable and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, offset partially by decreased inventories. Accounts receivable increased due to higher monthly March 2011 sales, compared with December 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we collected $56.6 million related to alternative fuel mixture credits. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities decreased due to a decrease in compensation and benefit accruals and lower trade accounts payable within our Paper segment, which were offset partially by higher interest accruals on our senior notes. The decrease in inventories provided $2.4 million of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with $16.1 million of cash used in the same period a year ago. The decrease in inventories in the current quarter is due to increased sales. |
The increase in cash used for working capital was offset partially by:
| A $29.5 million increase in income from operations. As discussed under Operating Results above, the higher income from operations related primarily to increased sales prices for all of our major products in both our Paper and Packaging segments. |
| Reduced cash contributions to our pension plans. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we contributed $3.4 million to our pension plans, compared with $5.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Including our first quarter contributions, we expect to contribute approximately $25 million to our qualified pension plans during 2011. |
Sensitivity Analysis Related to Sources and Uses of Cash From/For Our Operating Activities
Sources and uses of cash flows from operating activities
Our primary source of cash is revenue generated by the sale of our paper and packaging products, including uncoated freesheet papers, linerboard, corrugated containers and sheets, and newsprint. Declines in working capital also provide cash for operations, including declines in receivables from sales of our products, reductions in inventory levels, reductions in prepaid expenses, and increases in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we sold the following:
| 311,000 short tons of uncoated freesheet paper. |
| 62,000 short tons of linerboard to third parties. |
43
| 1,912 million square feet of corrugated containers and sheets. |
| 55,000 short tons of newsprint. |
| 22,000 short tons of market pulp. |
Compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010, selling prices for linerboard (sold to third parties), newsprint, market pulp, corrugated sheets and containers, and uncoated freesheet increased 43%, 23%, 22%, 19%, and 5%, respectively. Selling prices improved due to improved market conditions. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we took approximately 7,000 short tons of market-related downtime for uncoated freesheet, while we did not take any during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Our primary uses of cash are for expenses related to the manufacture of paper and packaging products, including fiber, compensation, energy, and chemicals. For further information pertaining to our expenses, see Our Operating Results in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Sensitivity Analysis
Our operations can be affected by the following sensitivities (dollars in millions):
Sensitivity Analysis |
Estimated Annual Impact on Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
|||
Each $10/short ton change in the selling price of the following products (except for corrugated containers and sheets): |
||||
Paper |
||||
Uncoated freesheet |
$ | 12 | ||
Packaging |
||||
Containerboard (linerboard) |
2 | |||
Newsprint |
2 | |||
Corrugated containers and sheets ($1.00/msf change in price) |
9 | |||
Interest rate (1% change in interest rate on our variable-rate debt before hedging) |
2 | |||
Energy (a) |
||||
Natural gas ($1.00/mmBtu change in price) |
12 | |||
Diesel ($0.50/gallon change in price) |
8 | |||
Fiber (1% change in cost of fiber) |
5 | |||
Chemicals (1% change in cost of chemicals) |
2 |
(a) | Based on 2010 consumption levels. The allocation between energy sources may vary during the year in order to take advantage of market conditions. The diesel sensitivity does not take into account any floors that may exist in rail or truck fuel surcharge formulas. |
Investment Activities
Cash investing activities used $215.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with $10.8 million used for the same period in 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we used $201.7 million of cash for the Tharco Acquisition. See Note 2, Acquisition of Tharco Packaging, Inc., of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information. Cash capital expenditures for property, plant, and equipment for the three months ended March 31, 2011, were $24.7 million, compared with $14.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
44
Cash investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011, also included $3.5 million for purchases of short-term investments and $14.1 million of proceeds from the maturity of short-term investments. Cash investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010, included $2.4 million for purchases of short-term investments and $5.2 million of maturities of short-term investments. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we liquidated our short-term investment portfolio.
We expect capital investments in 2011 to be between $115 million and $125 million, excluding acquisitions. This level of capital investment could increase or decrease as a result of a number of factors, including our financial results, future economic conditions, and our regulatory compliance requirements. Our capital spending in 2011 will be for cost savings, performance improvement, quality/efficiency projects, replacement projects, and ongoing environmental compliance. Our performance improvement projects also focus on opportunities to improve our energy efficiency. We expect to spend approximately $2 million in 2011 for capital environmental compliance requirements.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $46.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared with $35.5 million of cash used for financing activities for the same period in 2010. Financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011, include a $75 million revolving credit facility draw related to the Tharco Acquisition; $26.3 million of long-term debt repayments, $20 million of which related to repayment of our revolver draw; and $2.0 million of additional consideration paid to the former owners of our sheet feeder plant in Texas as part of the 2007 acquisition of that facility. Cash used for financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010, reflect $323.7 million of debt repayments, $300.0 million of debt issuances, and $11.8 million of cash paid for deferred financing costs.
Our expected debt service obligation, assuming debt interest rates stay at March 31, 2011, levels, is estimated to be approximately $82 million for the remainder of 2011 and $187 million for 2012, consisting of cash payments for principal, interest, and fees. These amounts remain subject to change, and such changes may be material. For example, a 1% increase in interest rates would increase interest expense by approximately $2 million per year (based on debt levels and interest rates as of March 31, 2011).
We lease our distribution centers, as well as other property and equipment, under operating leases. These operating leases are not included in debt; however, they represent a commitment. Obligations under operating leases are shown in the Contractual Obligations section of Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2010 Form 10-K.
For more information about our debt, see Note 11, Debt, of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
For information on contractual obligations, see the discussion under the heading Contractual Obligations in Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2010 Form 10-K. As of March 31, 2011, there have been no material changes to our contractual obligations from those disclosed in our 2010 Form 10-K, except as disclosed in Note 6, Leases, and Note 11, Debt, of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
At March 31, 2011, we had no off-balance-sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities.
Note 18, Commitments, Guarantees, and Legal Proceedings, of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q describe the nature of our guarantees, including the approximate terms of the guarantees, how the guarantees arose, the events or circumstances that would require us to perform under the guarantees, and the maximum potential undiscounted amounts of future payments we could be required to make.
45
Inflationary and Seasonal Influences
Our major costs of production are fiber, compensation, energy, and chemicals. Pricing for these manufacturing inputs can be subject to both macroeconomic inflationary influences and regional supply and demand. For example, fiber prices are highly dependent on regional wood supply and demand trends. Pricing for natural gas, which constitutes a significant portion of our energy costs, tends to follow macroeconomic supply and demand trends and can fluctuate based on many factors, including weather and natural gas storage levels. Many of our chemicals are specialized, and pricing may not correlate with macroeconomic trends. Pricing for our manufactured end products is dependent on industry supply and demand trends, which in turn can be influenced by macroeconomic manufacturing activity, employment levels, and consumer spending.
We experience some seasonality, based primarily on buying patterns associated with particular products. For example, the demand for our corrugated containers is influenced by changes in agricultural demand in the Pacific Northwest. In addition, seasonally cold weather increases costs, especially energy consumption, at all of our manufacturing facilities. Seasonality also affects working capital levels as described below.
Working capital levels fluctuate throughout the year and are affected by seasonality, scheduled annual maintenance shutdowns, and changing sales patterns. Typically, we build working capital in our Paper segment at the end of the fourth quarter, as we build finished goods inventory in preparation for first-quarter sales. Finished goods inventories are also increased prior to scheduled annual maintenance shutdowns to maintain sales volumes while production is stopped. Inventories for some raw materials, such as fiber, exhibit seasonal swings, as we increase log and chip inventories to ensure ample supply of fiber to our mills throughout the winter. In our Packaging segment, agricultural demand influences working capital, as finished goods inventory levels are increased in preparation for the harvest season in the third and fourth quarters. Changes in sales volumes can affect accounts receivable levels in both our Paper and Packaging segments, influencing overall working capital levels. We believe our management practices with respect to working capital conform to common business practices in the U.S.
For information on environmental issues, see the discussion under the heading Environmental in Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2010 Form 10-K. As of March 31, 2011, there have been no material changes to our environmental information from that disclosed in our 2010 Form 10-K.
Critical accounting estimates are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results. These estimates require managements most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to estimate matters that are inherently uncertain. We review the development, selection, and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our board of directors. For information about critical accounting estimates, see the discussion under the heading Critical Accounting Estimates in Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations in our 2010 Form 10-K. As of March 31, 2011, there have been no material changes to our critical accounting estimates from those disclosed in our 2010 Form 10-K, except as discussed below.
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. At March 31, 2011, we had $101.3 million of goodwill recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, all of which was recorded in connection with the Tharco Acquisition in our Packaging segment. At March 31, 2011, the net carrying amount of intangible assets with indefinite lives, which represents the trade names and trademarks acquired from Boise Cascade, L.L.C., in 2008, was $16.8 million, all of which is recorded in our Paper segment. All of our other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
46
We maintain two reporting units for purposes of our goodwill and intangible asset impairment testing, Paper and Packaging, which are the same as our operating segments discussed in Note 17, Segment Information, of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q. We test the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in each of our reporting units for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or sooner if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may exceed fair value. There is currently no indication of goodwill and intangible asset impairment, given the following:
1. | There have been no triggering events since fourth quarter. |
2. | The goodwill and intangible assets added in connection with the Tharco Acquisition represent fair value, given the following: |
| The purchase price allocation resulted from an assumption that a market participant such as ourselves would be willing to pay for the business. |
| Our future discounted cash flow estimates support the carrying value of our goodwill and intangible assets based on our estimates of future demand, pricing, and production costs, assuming certain levels of capital expenditures. |
While there are no current indications of impairment, we cannot predict the occurrence of future events that might adversely affect the reported value of goodwill and intangible assets. In conducting our goodwill impairment analysis, we utilize the discounted cash flow approach that estimates the projected future cash flows to be generated by our reporting units, discounted to present value using a discount rate reflecting our estimated cost of funds. For our trademark and trade name intangible asset impairment testing, we use a discounted cash flow approach based on a relief from royalty method. This method assumes that, through ownership of trademarks and trade names, we avoid royalty expense associated with licensing, resulting in cost savings. An estimated royalty rate, determined as a percentage of net sales, is used to estimate the value of the intangible assets. Differences in assumptions used in projecting future cash flows and cost of funds could have a significant impact on the determination of the fair value of our reporting units and intangible assets.
If managements estimates of future operating results materially change, or if there are changes to other assumptions, the estimated fair value of our identifiable intangible assets and goodwill could change significantly. Such change could result in impairment charges in future periods, which could have a significant noncash impact on our operating results and financial condition. We cannot predict the occurrence of future events that might adversely affect the reported value of our goodwill and intangible assets. As additional information becomes known, we may change our estimates.
New and Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
For a listing of our new and recently adopted accounting standards, see Note 15, New and Recently Adopted Accounting Standards, of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Information relating to quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk can be found under the caption Liquidity and Capital Resources in Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2010 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes in our exposure to market risk from those disclosed in our 2010 Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Attached as exhibits to this Form 10-Q are certifications of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires that we include these certifications with this report. This Controls and Procedures section includes information concerning the disclosure controls and procedures referred to in the certifications. You should read this section in conjunction with the certifications.
47
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, defines such term. We have designed these controls and procedures to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. We have also designed our disclosure controls to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our senior management, including our chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow them to make timely decisions regarding our required disclosures.
We evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures on at least a quarterly basis. A number of key components in our internal control system assist us in these evaluations. We have a disclosure committee that meets regularly and receives input from our senior management, general counsel, and internal audit staff. This committee is charged with considering and evaluating the materiality of information and reviewing the companys disclosure obligations on a timely basis. Our internal audit department also evaluates components of our internal controls on an ongoing basis. To assist in its evaluations, the internal audit staff identifies, documents, and tests our disclosure controls and procedures. Our intent is to maintain disclosure controls and procedures as dynamic processes that change as our business and working environments change.
Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in meeting the objectives for which they were designed and were operating at a reasonable assurance level.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and well-operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. We have also designed our disclosure controls and procedures based in part on assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
On March 1, 2011, our wholly owned subsidiary Boise Paper Holdings acquired all of the outstanding stock of Tharco Packaging, Inc. (Tharco). In connection with integrating Tharco, we are evaluating and, where necessary, will implement changes in controls and procedures at Tharco as the integration proceeds. This process may result in additions or changes to our internal control over financial reporting. Except for the acquisition, there were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2011, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls.
48
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are a party to routine proceedings that arise in the course of our business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings or environmental claims that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity, either individually or in the aggregate.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about our expectations, anticipated financial results, projected capital expenditures, and future business prospects, are forward-looking statements. You can identify these statements by our use of words such as may, will, expect, believe, should, plan, anticipate, and other similar expressions. You can find examples of these statements throughout this report, including the Executive Summary section of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. We cannot guarantee that our actual results will be consistent with the forward-looking statements we make in this report. You should review carefully the risk factors listed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). During the three months ended March 31, 2011, there have been no material changes to the risk factors presented in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We do not assume an obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
(a) | None. |
(b) | None. |
(c) | The following table presents information related to our repurchases of common stock made during the three months ended March 31, 2011: |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
||||||||||||||||
Period |
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased (1) |
Average Price Paid Per Share (or Unit) (1) |
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
||||||||||||
January 1 31, 2011 |
| $ | | | | |||||||||||
February 1 28, 2011 |
69,559 | 8.98 | | | ||||||||||||
March 1 31, 2011 |
166,734 | 8.55 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
236,293 | $ | 8.68 | | | |||||||||||
(1) | Includes (a) 69,544 shares repurchased on February 28, 2011, at a price of $8.98 per share, to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations that arose on the vesting of a portion of the restricted stock awarded to employees in 2008; (b) fractional shares, totaling 15 shares, repurchased on February 28, 2011, at a price of $8.98 per share, resulting from the vesting schedule of the 2008 restricted stock awards; and (c) 166,734 shares repurchased on March 15, 2011, at a price of $8.55 per share, to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations that arose on the vesting of a portion of the restricted stock awarded to employees in 2009. |
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
49
ITEM 4. | (REMOVED AND RESERVED) |
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
Required exhibits are listed in the Index to Exhibits and are incorporated by reference.
50
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BOISE INC. | BZ INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LLC | |||
/S/ BERNADETTE M. MADARIETA |
/S/ BERNADETTE M. MADARIETA | |||
Bernadette M. Madarieta Vice President and Controller |
Bernadette M. Madarieta Vice President and Controller | |||
(As Duly Authorized Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) | (As Duly Authorized Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) |
Date: May 2, 2011
51
BOISE INC.
BZ INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LLC
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Filed or Furnished With the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011
Exhibit |
Exhibit Description |
Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith |
|||||||||||||||
Form | Exhibit Number |
Filing Date |
||||||||||||||||
2 | Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 21, 2011, among Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., the Sellers party thereto, Tricor (Tharco) Equity Holdings, Inc., as the Seller Representative, and Tharco Packaging, Inc. | X | ||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Tharco Packaging, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | X | ||||||||||||||||
3.2 | Tharco Packaging, Inc. Bylaws, amended as of March 1, 2011 | X | ||||||||||||||||
3.3 | Tharco Containers, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation | X | ||||||||||||||||
3.4 | Tharco Containers, Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws, amended as of March 1, 2011 | X | ||||||||||||||||
3.5 | Tharco Containers Texas, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | X | ||||||||||||||||
3.6 | Tharco Containers Texas, Inc. Bylaws, amended as of March 1, 2011 | X | ||||||||||||||||
3.7 | Design Packaging, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation | X | ||||||||||||||||
3.8 | Design Packaging, Inc. Bylaws | X |
52
Exhibit |
Exhibit Description |
Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith |
|||||||||||||||
Form | Exhibit Number |
Filing Date |
||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Indenture dated October 26, 2009, between Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise Finance Company, the Guarantors set forth therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, together with First Supplemental Indenture dated March 19, 2010, and Second Supplemental Indenture dated March 8, 2011 |
X | ||||||||||||||||
4.2 | Indenture dated March 19, 2010, between Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise Co-Issuer Company, the Guarantors set forth therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, together with First Supplemental Indenture dated March 8, 2011 | X | ||||||||||||||||
10.1 * | Form of 2011 Restricted Stock Award Agreement (2011 Regular Award to Officers) | 8-K | 99.1 | 3/18/11 | ||||||||||||||
10.2 * | Form of 2011 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (2011 Regular Award to Officers) | 8-K | 99.2 | 3/18/11 | ||||||||||||||
10.3 * | Form of 2011 Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement (2011 Regular Award to Officers) | 8-K | 99.3 | 3/18/11 | ||||||||||||||
10.4 * | Form of 2011 Performance Unit Award Agreement (2011 Regular Award to Officers) | 8-K | 99.4 | 3/18/11 | ||||||||||||||
10.5 * | Form of 2011 Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Nonemployee Directors) | X | ||||||||||||||||
11 | Presented in Footnote 3, Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share, to Consolidated Financial Statements | |||||||||||||||||
31.1 | CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||
31.2 | CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X |
53
Exhibit |
Exhibit Description |
Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith |
|||||||||||||||
Form | Exhibit Number |
Filing Date |
||||||||||||||||
32 | Section 906 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC | X |
* | Indicates exhibits that constitute management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements. |
54