Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-28782
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
93-0979187 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
157 Technology Drive |
|
|
Irvine, California
|
|
92618 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (949) 788-6700
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,
if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of Common Stock as of the
latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at May 13, 2009 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.001 par value
|
|
32,995,887 |
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Three-month period ended March 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
Statement Regarding Financial Information
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
included herein have been prepared by management pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information normally included in the
consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States has been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.
However, we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading.
We recommend that you read the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included
herein in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC
on March 31, 2009.
2
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per |
|
|
|
Share Data) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted
Cash |
|
$ |
4,065 |
|
|
$ |
9,860 |
|
Restricted
Cash (Note 2) |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
14,065 |
|
|
|
9,860 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
49,833 |
|
|
|
68,226 |
|
Accounts receivable-trade, net |
|
|
6,306 |
|
|
|
5,002 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
72,834 |
|
|
|
85,622 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
ZEVALIN related intangible assets, net |
|
|
36,092 |
|
|
|
37,042 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
110,848 |
|
|
$ |
124,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued obligations |
|
$ |
8,221 |
|
|
$ |
5,627 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
1,921 |
|
|
|
2,956 |
|
Note payable
in connection with ZEVALIN Acquisition |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
Current portion of deferred revenue and other credits |
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
Accrued drug development costs |
|
|
4,798 |
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
33,440 |
|
|
|
28,032 |
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Deferred revenue and other credits, net of current portion |
|
|
31,785 |
|
|
|
33,929 |
|
ZEVALIN related contingent obligations |
|
|
4,998 |
|
|
|
8,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
70,312 |
|
|
|
70,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in consolidated entity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Junior participating preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series E Convertible voting preferred stock, 2,000 shares authorized,
stated value $10,000 per share, $0.8 million aggregate liquidation
value; 68 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
Issued and outstanding, 32,547,700 and 32,166,316 shares at March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
297,208 |
|
|
|
296,531 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(256,593 |
) |
|
|
(257,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
40,536 |
|
|
|
39,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
110,848 |
|
|
$ |
124,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
3
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per |
|
|
|
Share Data) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License and contract revenue |
|
$ |
2,125 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Product sales |
|
|
12,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
14,163 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sold |
|
$ |
1,834 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
5,654 |
|
|
|
6,382 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangibles |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
6,351 |
|
|
|
2,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
14,789 |
|
|
|
8,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
(8,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest in consolidated entities |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
(8,666 |
) |
Minority interest in net loss of consolidated entities |
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
(8,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
32,439,523 |
|
|
|
31,271,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
32,644,425 |
|
|
|
31,271,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
4
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per |
|
|
|
Share Data) |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
(loss) |
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
(8,666 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from / (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred revenue |
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
Fair value of common stock issued in connection with drug license |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Minority interest in consolidated entities |
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
|
(1,304 |
) |
|
|
107 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(562 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued obligations |
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
Deferred revenue and other credits |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
(7,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales of marketable securities |
|
|
18,112 |
|
|
|
10,151 |
|
Investment
in ZEVALIN acquisition |
|
|
(14,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restricted
Cash in escrow for ZEVALIN acquisition |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(6,110 |
) |
|
|
10,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(5,795 |
) |
|
|
2,896 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
9,860 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
4,065 |
|
|
$ |
4,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of common stock issued in connection with drug license |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of restricted stock granted employees and directors |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of stock issued to match employee 401k contributions |
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends paid with common stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of equity awarded to consultants and placement agents |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
5
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
1. Business and Basis of Presentation
Business
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company, we, Spectrum, our, or us) is a
commercial stage biopharmaceutical company committed to developing and commercializing innovative
therapies with a focus primarily in the areas of hematology-oncology and urology. We have a fully
developed commercial infrastructure that is responsible for the sales and marketing of two drugs in
the United States, FUSILEV and ZEVALIN. Our lead developmental drug is Apaziquone,
which is presently being studied in two large Phase 3 clinical trials for non-muscle invasive
bladder cancer under a strategic collaboration with Allergan Inc. (Allergan)
The following is a brief update of our most advanced products as of March 31, 2009:
FUSILEV (levoleucovorin) for injection (FUSILEV): We commercially launched FUSILEV
in August 2008 and recorded net revenues of $9.4 million from FUSILEV sales for the three months
ended March 31, 2009.
A Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) target date of October 2009 has been established by
the FDA for a decision regarding the approval for our October 2008 supplemental New Drug
Application (sNDA) filing for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer, which is currently under
review by the FDA.
ZEVALIN® ([90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan) (ZEVALIN): In December 2008, we
partnered with Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (CTI) to form a 50-50 owned joint venture, RIT Oncology, LLC
(RIT) to commercialize and develop ZEVALIN in the United States. In March 2009, we acquired the
remaining 50% ownership of RIT, resulting in RIT becoming our
wholly-owned subsidiary, for $16.5
million. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded net revenues of $2.6 million from
ZEVALIN sales.
In December 2008, the FDA accepted for filing and review, and granted priority review status
for RITs supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for the use of ZEVALIN as first-line
therapy for patients with B-cell follicular non-Hodgkins
lymphoma or NHL. A PDUFA target date of July 2, 2009 was
established by the FDA for a decision regarding this sBLA which, if approved, will allow for the label to address a substantially larger patient
population.
Apaziquone: Pursuant to our October 2008 strategic collaboration agreement with
Allergan to co-develop and co-market Apaziquone for bladder cancer, we continue to conduct the two
Apaziquone clinical trials pursuant to a joint development plan, with Allergan bearing 65% of these
expenses, commencing January 1, 2009. During the three months
ended March 31, 2009, Allergen reimbursed us approximately
$2.7 million of research and development costs. In addition, during
the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded $2.1 million licensing revenue from the
amortization of the up front $41.5 million fee received from Allergan in October 2008.
We continue to recruit sites and enroll patients in these two studies and our goal is to
complete enrollment for both Phase 3 clinical trials by year-end 2009.
For a more detailed description of these and our other drugs in development, refer to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
6
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared on a
consistent basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting
of normal recurring accruals and consolidation and elimination entries) considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31,
2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2009. The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited
financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the
consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and of its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. As of March 31, 2009, we had three
consolidated subsidiaries: RIT, a 100% owned effective March 15, 2009, organized in Delaware in 2008;
OncoRx Pharma Private Limited (OncoRx), a 100% owned, organized in Mumbai, India in 2008 and
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals GmbH, a wholly-owned inactive subsidiary, incorporated in Switzerland in
April 1997; and one consolidated joint venture: Spectrum Pharma Canada, organized in Quebec, Canada
in January 2008. We have eliminated all significant intercompany accounts and transactions.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and
disclosure of contingent obligations in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Our most
significant assumptions are employed in estimates used in determining values of financial
instruments and accrued obligations, as well as in estimates used in applying the revenue
recognition policy and estimating share-based compensation. The estimation process requires
assumptions to be made about future events and conditions, and as such, is inherently subjective
and uncertain. Actual results could differ materially from our estimates.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities primarily consist of bank checking deposits,
short-term treasury securities, institutional money market funds, corporate debt and equity,
municipal obligations, government agency notes, and certificates of deposit. We classify highly
liquid short-term investments, with insignificant interest rate risk and maturities of 90 days or
less at the time of acquisition, as cash and cash equivalents. Other investments, which do not meet
the above definition of cash equivalents, are classified as either held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale marketable securities, in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement
(SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Investments
that lack immediate liquidity, or which we intend to hold for more than one year are classified as
long-term investments, and included in other assets. As of March 31, 2009, $10 million of our cash
funds were held in an escrow account in connection with the March 2009 acquisition of the remaining
50% rights in RIT.
7
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
We have adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, or FAS 157, and utilize the market approach to measure fair value of our financial
assets and liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by
market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The standard describes
a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered
observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the
following:
Level 1: |
|
Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible
at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value
hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs. |
|
Level 2: |
|
Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active
markets, but corroborated by market data. |
|
Level 3: |
|
Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is
available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to
Level 3 inputs. |
In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as considers
counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.
The
carrying values of our cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities,
and funds held in escrow carried at fair
value as of March 31, 2009, are classified in the table below in one of the three categories
described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Cash & equivalents |
|
$ |
4,065 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,065 |
|
U.S. Treasury T-Bills |
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
Money Market Currency Funds |
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,530 |
|
FDIC insured bank CDs |
|
|
12,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,207 |
|
Medium term Corporate Notes |
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,252 |
|
U.S. Treasury Backed Securities |
|
|
22,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,792 |
|
Funds held in escrow |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Other Securities |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,938 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
described elsewhere funds held in escrow are related to the
$16.5 million acquisition of the 50% rights in RIT.
As of March 31, 2009, substantially all of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities were held at major financial institutions, who are required to invest our funds in
accordance with our investment policy with the principal objectives being preservation of capital,
fulfillment of liquidity needs and above market returns commensurate with preservation of capital.
Our investment policy also requires that investments in marketable securities be in only highly
rated instruments, which are primarily US treasury bills or US treasury backed securities, with
limitations on investing in securities of any single issuer. To a
limited degree, these investments
are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and by third party insurance. However,
these investments are not insured against the possibility of a complete loss of earnings or
principal and are inherently subject to the credit risk related to the continued credit worthiness
of the underlying issuer and general credit market risks as have existed since late 2007. We manage
such risks on our portfolio by matching scheduled investment maturities with our cash requirements
and investing in highly rated instruments.
Certain Risks and Concentrations
Our cash and marketable security investments are subject to concentration of credit risk. We
manage such risk by diversification of the investment portfolio and by the purchase of
investment-grade securities.
Our product sales are concentrated in a limited number of customers. For the three months
ended March 31, 2009, approximately 32% of our product sales were derived from Group Purchasing
Organizations (GPOs) of oncology products, and approximately 68% from distributors. We do not
require collateral or other security to support credit sales, but provide an allowance for bad
debts when warranted.
8
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
We are dependent on single source suppliers for raw materials, and the manufacturing of
finished product of FUSILEV and ZEVALIN. A disruption in supply could materially affect our sales.
Similarly, we have single source suppliers the manufacturing of our
development drug product candidates. If we are unable to obtain sufficient quantities of such
product, our research and development activities may be adversely affected.
Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. The lower of
cost or market is determined based on net estimated realizable value after appropriate
consideration is given to obsolescence, excessive levels, deterioration, and other factors.
Patents and Licenses
We own or license all the intellectual property that forms the basis of our business model. We
expense all licensing and patent application costs as they are incurred.
Purchase price allocation
In
December 2008, we partnered with CTI to form a 50/50 owned joint
venture, RIT, to commercialize and develop ZEVALIN in the U.S. In March 2009, CTI sold to us their remaining 50% ownership in RIT, resulting in RIT
becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary. The assets contributed by CTI to RIT were all of its interests
in the ZEVALIN business.
Based on the provisions of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, the purchase price for the
acquisition of ZEVALIN rights was allocated to identifiable intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date, as determined by
an independent third-party valuation firm. Such a valuation requires significant estimates and
assumptions including but not limited to: determining the timing and expected costs to complete the
in-process projects, projecting regulatory approvals, estimating future cash flows from product
sales resulting from in-process projects, and developing appropriate discount rates and probability
rates by project. We believe the fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed are based on reasonable assumptions. However, these assumptions may be inaccurate, and
unanticipated events and circumstances may occur.
We recorded intangible assets in connection with the acquisition of ZEVALIN and related
amortization as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
Developed technology |
|
$ |
23,100 |
|
|
$ |
(660 |
) |
|
$ |
22,440 |
|
Core technology |
|
|
14,100 |
|
|
|
(447 |
) |
|
|
13,653 |
|
|
Acquired in-process
research and
development |
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
(4,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
41,900 |
|
|
$ |
(5,807 |
) |
|
$ |
36,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over
their estimated useful lives. The developed and core technology assets will be amortized over
10 years, or approximately $3.7 million annually through 2018. Included in the intangible assets
was an amount of $4.7 million of in process research and
development (IPR&D) for a medical indication still awaiting approval by the FDA.
Such amount was completely written off during the year ended December 31, 2008.
9
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Industry Segment and Geographic Information
We operate in one business segment, that of acquiring, developing and commercializing
prescription drug products. Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements are reported in the
aggregate, including all our activities in one segment. Our foreign operations were not significant
for any of the years presented herein.
Revenue Recognition
We follow the provisions as set forth by current accounting rules, which primarily include
Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104, Revenue Recognition, and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
No. 00-21, Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. Generally, revenue is
recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, the price is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
Up-front fees representing non-refundable payments received upon the execution of licensing or
other agreements are recognized as revenue upon execution of the agreements where we have no
significant future performance obligations and collectability of the fees is reasonably assured.
Milestone payments, which are generally based on developmental or regulatory events, are recognized
as revenue when the milestones are achieved, collectability is reasonably assured, and we have no
significant future performance obligations in connection with the milestone. In those instances
where we have collected fees or milestone payments but have significant future performance
obligations related to the development of the drug product, we record deferred revenue and
recognize it over the period of our future obligations. Pursuant to this policy, as of December 31,
2008, we had recorded all of the $41.5 million upfront fee we received from Allergan for the
October 2008 codevelopment agreement as deferred revenue. We expect that we shalll amortize such
deferred revenue to income over the anticipated period of Apaziquones development for bladder
cancer. Accordingly, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, we amortized $2.1 million to
licensing revenue, and as of March 31, 2009, classified $8.5 million of unamortized deferred
revenue as current portion of deferred revenue.
Revenue from sales of product is recognized upon shipment of product when title and risk of
loss have transferred to the customer, and provisions for estimates, including promotional
adjustments, price adjustments, returns, and other potential adjustments are reasonably
determinable. Such revenue is recorded, net of such estimated provisions, at the minimum amount of
the customers obligation to us. We also state the related accounts receivable at net realizable
value, with any allowance for doubtful accounts charged to general operating expenses. If revenue
from sales is not reasonably determinable due to provisions for estimates, promotional adjustments,
price adjustments, returns or any other potential adjustments, we defer the revenue and recognize
revenue when the estimates are reasonably determinable, even if the monies for the gross sales have
been received.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses include salaries and benefits, clinical trial and related
manufacturing costs, contract and other outside service fees, and facilities and overhead costs
related to our research and development efforts. Research and development expenses also consist of
costs incurred for proprietary and collaboration research and development and include activities
such as product registries and investigator-sponsored trials. In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs,
research and development costs are expensed as incurred. In certain instances we enter into
agreements with third parties for research and development activities, where we may prepay fees for
services at the initiation of the contract. In accordance with EITF 07-3, Accounting for
Nonrefundable Advance Payment for Goods or Services to be Used in Future Research and Development
Activities, we record such prepayment as a prepaid asset and charge research and development
expense over the period of time the contracted research and development services are performed. In
connection with the October 2008 codevelopment agreement, Allergan bears 65% of the development
costs incurred for Apaziquone in bladder cancer, commencing January 1, 2009. During the three
months ended March 31, 2009, approximately $2.7 million of development costs were reimbursed by
Allergan, and credited against total related research and development expense.
10
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
We review and accrue drug development expenses based on factors such as estimates of work
performed, patient enrollment, completion of patient studies and other events. Accrued clinical
study costs are subject to revisions as trials progress to completion. Revisions are recorded in
the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share
In accordance with FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share, we calculate basic net income
(loss) per share by using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
periods presented. Diluted net income (loss) per share is calculated by using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented, increased to include all
additional dilutive common shares issuable pursuant to outstanding common stock equivalents,
determined using the treasury-stock method.
Potentially dilutive common stock equivalents include the common stock issuable upon the
conversion of preferred stock and the exercise of warrants and stock options. These are included in
the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share only when their effect is dilutive. We
incurred a net loss in each period presented, and as such, did not include the effect of
potentially dilutive common stock equivalents in the diluted net loss per share calculation, as
their effect would be anti-dilutive for all periods. Dilutive common stock equivalents would
include the common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and the exercise of
warrants and stock options that have conversion or exercise prices below the market value of our
common stock at the measurement date.
The following table presents the data used in the calculations of basic and diluted net income
(loss) per share for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Months |
|
|
Three-Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
(8,666 |
) |
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends paid in cash or stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
(8,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
32,439,523 |
|
|
|
31,271,281 |
|
Dilutive preferred shares |
|
|
136,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive options |
|
|
68,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
32,644,425 |
|
|
|
31,271,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting for Employee Share-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. We measure
compensation cost for all share-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognize
compensation expense in our consolidated statements of operations over the service period that the
awards are expected to vest. As permitted under SFAS No. 123(R), we have elected to recognize
compensation cost for all options with graded vesting on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period of the entire option.
In estimating the fair value of share-based compensation, we use the closing market price of
our common stock for stock awards, and the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model for stock options and
warrants. We estimate future volatility based on past volatility of our common stock, and we
estimate the expected length of options based on several criteria, including the vesting period of
the grant and the expected volatility.
We recorded share-based compensation expense during the three-month period ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
share based charges |
|
$ |
968 |
|
|
$ |
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
We recorded no tax provision for the three-month ended March 31, 2009, based on an anticipated
operating loss for the full calendar year.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on the deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. The Company has determined that the deferred tax asset does not meet the more
likely than not criteria under SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, and, accordingly, a
valuation allowance has been recorded to reduce the net deferred tax asset to zero.
11
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income. SFAS No. 130 requires the disclosure of all components of comprehensive income, including
net income and changes in equity during a period from transactions and other events and
circumstances generated from non-owner sources. The Companys accumulated other comprehensive
income at March 31, 2009 consisted primarily of net unrealized gains on investments in marketable
securities as of that date.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 2008, we adopted the provisions of EITF Issue No. 07-3, Accounting for
Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services to Be Used in Future Research and Development
Activities, or Issue 07-3, which addresses the accounting for nonrefundable advance payments. The
EITF concluded that nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services to be received in the
future for use in research and development activities should be deferred and capitalized. The
capitalized amounts should be expensed as the related goods are delivered or the services are
performed. If an entitys expectations change such that it does not expect it will need the goods
to be delivered or the services to be rendered, capitalized nonrefundable advance payments should
be charged to expense. The adoption of Issue No. 07-3 did not have a material impact on our results
of operations or financial position.
In December 2007, FASB ratified the final consensuses in Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF,
Issue No. 07-1, Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements, or Issue 07-1, which requires certain
income statement presentation of transactions with third parties and of payments between parties to
the collaborative arrangement, along with disclosure about the nature and purpose of the
arrangement. Issue 07-1 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption of this
accounting pronouncement did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)),
which replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R), requires an acquirer to
recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited
exceptions. This Statement also requires the acquirer in a business combination achieved in stages
to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as the non-controlling interest in
the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values. SFAS No. 141(R) makes various other
amendments to authoritative literature intended to provide additional guidance or to confirm the
guidance in that literature to that provided in this Statement. This Statement applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning
of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not have a
significant impact on our financial statements.
In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide users of financial
statements with an enhanced understanding of: (i) How and why an entity uses derivative
instruments; (ii) How derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and (iii) How derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This
Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.
In May 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 162 The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 162), which is effective 90 days following the SECs approval of the Public
Company Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity
With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of
financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP in the
United States (the GAAP hierarchy). The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not have a
significant impact on our financial statements.
12
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
In June 2008, FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1
addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in computing earnings per share
under the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. FSP EITF 03-6-1
requires companies to treat unvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to
dividend or dividend equivalents as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per
share. FSP EITF 03-6-1 will be effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning March 1, 2009,
with early adoption prohibited. We are evaluating the effect the implementation of FSP EITF 03-6-1
will have, if any, on basic net earnings per share.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers
Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1). FSP FAS 132(R)-1 amends
FASB Statement No. 132 (revised 2003), Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits, to provide guidance on an employers disclosures about plan assets of a
defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires an employer to
disclose information on the investment policies and strategies as well as on the significant
concentrations of risk in plan assets. An employer must also disclose the fair value of each major
category of plan assets as of each annual reporting date together with the information on the
inputs and valuation techniques used to develop such fair value measurements. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will
be effective for the Companys financial statements as of
December 31, 2009 and is not expected to have any impact
on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments. This FSP requires the fair value disclosures required by FAS 107
regarding the fair value of financial instruments to be included in interim financial statements.
This FSP is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, and requires additional
disclosure from that required currently.
Reclassification of Accounts
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior-year comparative financial statements to conform
to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported
results of operations or financial position.
3. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable, at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, were comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
($ in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable gross |
|
$ |
10,799 |
|
|
$ |
9,926 |
|
Allowances for discounts, chargebacks
and returns |
|
|
(4,343 |
) |
|
|
(4,774 |
) |
Allowances for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable, net of allowances |
|
$ |
6,306 |
|
|
$ |
5,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, due to limited experience with sales returns, we had deferred the
recognition of $3.1 million revenue for product returns, until we had additional
sales return data. Based on the experience gained to date, we believe
that as of March 31, 2009, a product
returns reserve of approximately $1.9 million is more than adequate. We continually monitor the returns activity
and will appropriately adjust such return reserve, as necessary.
4. Inventories
Inventories at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, were comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
($ in 000s) |
|
|
($ in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished Goods |
|
$ |
1,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,492 |
|
Work In Process |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
Raw Materials |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Less: reserve for inventory allowances |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,894 |
|
|
$ |
1,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
We continually review product inventories on hand. Inventory levels are evaluated relative to
product demand, remaining shelf life, future marketing plans and other factors, and reserves for
obsolete and slow-moving inventories are recorded for amounts which may not be realizable.
5. Commitments and Contingencies
Facility and Equipment Leases
As
of March 31, 2009, we were obligated under a facility lease and
various operating and capital
equipment leases. The facility lease will expire on June 30, 2009. While we have a 5-year renewal
option, we are evaluating whether to renew the lease for an
additional 5 years term or consider securing
an alternate facility. In the event we decide to secure an alternate facility, we do not expect the
relocation to adversely affect our operations.
Minimum lease requirements for each of the next five years and thereafter, under the property
and equipment operating leases, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Capital Lease |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Lease Commitments |
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
|
Amounts In Thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 (Remainder of year) |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing Agreements
Almost all of our drug candidates are being developed pursuant to license agreements that
provide us with rights in certain territories to, among other things, develop, sublicense,
manufacture and sell the drugs. We are generally required to use commercially reasonable efforts to
develop the drugs, are generally responsible for all development, patent filing and maintenance
costs, sales, marketing and liability insurance costs, and are generally contingently obligated to
make milestone payments to the licensors if we successfully reach development and regulatory
milestones specified in the license agreements. In addition, we are obligated to pay royalties and,
in some cases, milestone payments based on net sales, if any, after marketing approval is obtained
from regulatory authorities.
The potential contingent development and regulatory milestone obligations under all our
licensing agreements are generally tied to progress through the FDA approval process, which
approval significantly depends on positive clinical trial results. The following items are typical
of milestone events: conclusion of Phase 2 or commencement of Phase 3 clinical trials; filing of
new drug applications in each of the United States, Europe and Japan; and approvals from each of
the regulatory agencies in those jurisdictions.
Given the uncertainty of the drug development process, we are unable to predict with any
certainty when any of the milestones will occur, if at all. Accordingly, the milestone payments
represent contingent obligations that will be recorded as expense when the milestone is achieved.
While it is difficult to predict when milestones will be achieved, we estimate that if all of our
contingent milestones were successfully achieved within our anticipated timelines, our potential
contingent cash development and regulatory milestone obligations, aggregating approximately $84.2
million as of March 31, 2009, would be due approximately as follows: $14.0 million within 12
months; $4.5 million in 2 to 3 years; $7.0 million in 4 to 5 years; and $58.7 million after 5
years. In the event these milestones are achieved, we believe it is likely that the increase in the
potential value of the related drug product will significantly exceed the amount of the milestone
obligation.
14
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Service Agreements
In connection with the research and development of our drug products, we have entered into
contracts with numerous third party service providers, such as clinical trial centers, clinical
research organizations, data monitoring centers, and with drug formulation, development and testing
laboratories. The financial terms of these contracts are varied and generally obligate us to pay in
stages, depending on the occurrence of certain events specified in the contracts, such as contract
execution, reservation of service or production capacity, actual performance of service, or the
successful accrual and dosing of patients.
At each period end, we accrue for all costs of goods and services received, with such accruals
based on factors such as estimates of work performed, patient enrollment, completion of patient
studies and other events. As of March 31, 2009, we were committed under such contracts for up to
approximately $17.0 million, for future goods and services,
including approximately $12.0 million
due within one year. We are in a position to accelerate, slow-down or discontinue any or all of the
projects that we are working on at any given point in time. Should we decide to discontinue and/or
slow-down the work on any project, the associated costs for those projects would get limited to the
extent of the work completed. Generally, we are able to terminate these contracts due to the
discontinuance of the related project(s) and thus avoid paying for the services that have not yet
been rendered and our future purchase obligations would reduce accordingly.
Employment Agreement
We have entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Shrotriya, our President and Chief
Executive Officer, which expires January 2, 2011. The employment agreement automatically renews for
a one-year calendar term unless either party gives written notice of such partys intent not to
renew the agreement at least 90 days prior to the commencement
of the new term. The employment
agreement requires Dr. Shrotriya to devote his full working time and effort to the business and
affairs of the Company during the term of the agreement. The employment agreement provides for a
minimum annual base salary with annual increases, periodic bonuses and option grants as determined
by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
6. Stockholders Equity
Common Stock
In
March 2009, we issued to Targent, LLC, 125,000 shares of the Companys common stock for
payment of a milestone pursuant to the asset purchase agreement with Targent in connection with for
the acceptance of the sNDA by the FDA for FUSILEV in combination with 5-FU to prolong survival in
the palliative treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer by the FDA. The fair value of
the stock, $185,000, was recorded as a stock-based research and development charge for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2009.
Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance
As
of March 31, 2009, approximately 13.4 million shares of common stock were issuable upon
conversion or exercise of rights granted under prior financing arrangements and stock options and
warrants, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Series E preferred shares |
|
|
136,000 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
7,823,122 |
|
Exercise of warrants |
|
|
5,444,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares of common stock reserved for future issuances |
|
|
13,403,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent
to March 31, 2009, 2,165,372 employee stock options were purchased and retired pursuant to a
tender offer to all eligible employees. Also, subsequent to
March 31, 2009, warrants to acquire 1,252,000 shares of our
common stock expired unexercised. As a result of the foregoing, the total number of shares of common stock
reserved for issuance was reduced to approximately 10.0 million shares.
15
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Share-Based Compensation
As of March 31, 2009, approximately 484,000 incentive award shares were available for grant
under our share-based incentive award plan. Share-based awards generally vest over periods of up to
four years and have a ten-year life.
Presented below is a summary of activity, for our entire share-based incentive award plans,
during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009:
Stock Options:
During the three-month ended March 31, 2009, the Compensation Committee granted stock options
at exercise prices equal to or greater than the closing price of our
common stock on the trading day prior to the grant date. The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the nine-month
period ended March 31, 2009 was estimated at approximately $0.86, using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility (based on
the historical volatility of our common stock) of 68.4%; risk free interest rate of 1.6%; and an
expected life of 5 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(In Years) |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
$ |
7,115,772 |
|
|
$ |
4.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
765,850 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(20,625 |
) |
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(37,875 |
) |
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, at the end of period |
|
|
7,823,122 |
|
|
$ |
4.48 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest, at
end of period |
|
|
7,442,167 |
|
|
$ |
4.54 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, at the end of period |
|
|
5,582,210 |
|
|
$ |
4.96 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total difference between the
Companys closing common stock price of $1.41 on March 31, 2009 and the exercise price, multiplied
by the number of all in-the-money options, that would have been received by the option holders had all option
holders exercised their options on March 31, 2009. This amount changes based on the fair market
value of the Companys common stock.
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, the share-based charge in connection with
the expensing of stock options was approximately $0.6 million. As of March 31, 2009, there was
approximately $3.4 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to stock options
which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.
16
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Grant date |
|
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at beginning of period |
|
|
377,500 |
|
|
$ |
3.04 |
|
Granted |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(155,000 |
) |
|
|
2.35 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at the end of period |
|
|
422,500 |
|
|
$ |
2.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of restricted stock awards is the grant date closing market price of our stock,
and is charged to expense over the period of vesting. These awards are subject to forfeiture to the
extent that the recipients service is terminated prior to the shares becoming vested.
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, the share-based charge in connection with
the expensing of restricted stock awards was approximately $0.3 million. As of March 31, 2009,
there was approximately $0.8 million of unrecognized share-based compensation cost related to
nonvested restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.7 years.
401(k) Plan Matching Contribution:
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we issued 70,003 shares of common stock as
the Companys match of approximately $107,700 on the 401(k) contributions of our employees.
7. Subsequent Events
Tender Offer:
Due to our rapid growth over the past few years and a low personnel turnover rate combined
with our success in financing our operations without having to issue additional equity, we have a
limited number of shares available for future grant under the 2003
Amended and Restated Incentive Award Plan (the 2003 Plan). Primarily in order to
increase the pool of shares available for future grant under such plan, which grants will allow us
to provide incentives to our employees that align their interest with that of our stockholders, we
conducted a tender offer to eligible employees to acquire options granted to certain employees of
the company pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and 2003 Plan, outstanding at March 23, 2009. In addition, we wished to provide
our employees the opportunity to benefit from their significant contributions to our business
despite the loss of our stocks value, and to provide an additional incentive to remain with us.
Eligible employees were employees of Spectrum or its subsidiaries who held options with exercise
prices in excess of $5.00. The cash amount offered to those employees
was $0.01 for options with an exercise price over $10.00 and $1.15
for the options with an exercise price between $5.00 and $9.99.
17
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
On April 23, 2009, a total of 36 eligible employees participated in the tender offer. Pursuant
to the offer, we accepted all options tendered by eligible employees. 2,165,372 shares underlying
eligible options were tendered by eligible employees and were accepted by us, representing 73% of
the shares underlying eligible options that were eligible to be tendered in the offer. We made a
cash payment in the aggregate of approximately $2.4 million to the eligible employees participating
in the offer. Options accepted for tender in the offer originally issued under the 2003 Plan will
be made available for future issuance under the 2003 Plan.
CTI Arbitration
In December 2008, we partnered with Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (CTI) to form a 50-50 owned joint
venture, RIT, to commercialize and develop ZEVALIN ([90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan) in the United
States. In March 2009, CTI sold to us their remaining 50% ownership in RIT, resulting in RIT
becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary. We acquired CTIs 50% ownership right in RIT at a cost of
$16.5 million.
Under the terms of our agreement with CTI, we agreed to pay CTI $16.5 million in 3
installments. We paid the first installment of $6.5 million in March 2009. The balance of $10
million was placed into an escrow account, and the obligation of $10 million was reflected on the
balance sheet as of March 31, 2009. The escrow automatically released the second payment of $6.5
million on April 3rd, 2009. The third payment of $3.5 million due on April
15th,
2009 and was to be released automatically, unless any specific amount out of the $3.5
million was disputed by us in writing to the escrow agents and CTI. Any disputed amount was subject
to arbitration, which would be binding on both parties.
On
April 10, 2009, we disputed the entire $3.5 million, on the grounds that CTIs
unpaid liabilities pertaining to ZEVALIN, and CTIs share of joint
venture expenses equaled or exceeded the escrowed funds. This matter
is now in Arbitration.
We believe that we will prevail in our arguments during the arbitration; however we cannot
predict the outcome of the final arbitration proceedings at this time. CTI may or may not receive
all or some of the $3.5 million payment, depending on the final outcome of the arbitration.
Stock Offering
On
May 6, 2009, we sold, off our shelf registration statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-150260), an aggregate of 432,200 shares of
common stock to certain of our employees at
a purchase price of $2.70 per share, which was the closing price of the Companys common stock on
May 6, 2009 (the Offering). The offering resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of
approximately $1.2 million. The investors included
Dr. Rajesh Shrotriya, M.D., our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Shyam Kumaria, our Vice
President of Finance.
Dr. Shrotriya purchased 290,000 shares of common stock and Mr. Kumaria purchased 85,000 shares of
common stock. We decided to conduct the Offering to certain of our employees to allow such employees to invest
their personal cash directly into the Company at the current fair market value of our stock. The
purchase agreements include provisions prohibiting the investors from disposing of the shares of
common stock purchased in the Offering for ninety days. The Offering was approved by the Placement
Committee of the Board of Directors. In addition, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
approved the Offering pursuant to our Related Party Transaction Policies and Procedures.
18
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation,
statements regarding our future product development activities and costs, the revenue potential
(licensing, royalty and sales) of our product candidates, the the
success, safety and efficacy of our drug products, product approvals,
product sales, revenues, development timelines, product acquisitions,
liquidity and capital resources and trends, and other
statements containing forward-looking words, such as, believes, may, could, will,
expects, intends, estimates, anticipates, plans, seeks, or continues. Such
forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of the Companys management as well as
assumptions made by and information currently available to the Companys management. Readers should
not put undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which
cannot be predicted or quantified; therefore, our actual results may differ materially from those
described in any forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include,
but are not limited to, those discussed in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009. These
factors include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approvals for and market our
products; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to generate and maintain sufficient cash resources to fund our business; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter into strategic alliances with partners for manufacturing,
development and commercialization; |
|
|
|
|
efforts of our development partners; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our manufacturing partners to meet our timelines; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to identify new product candidates; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and/or results of pending or future clinical trials; |
|
|
|
|
competition in the marketplace for our drugs; |
|
|
|
|
actions by the FDA and other
regulatory agencies; and |
|
|
|
|
demand and market acceptance for our approved products; |
We do not plan to update any such forward-looking statements and expressly disclaim any duty
to update the information contained in this report except as required by law.
You should read the following discussion of the financial condition and results of our
operations in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to
those financial statements included in Item I of Part 1 of this report.
19
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Business Outlook
We are a commercial stage biopharmaceutical company
committed to developing and commercializing innovative therapies with a focus primarily in the areas of
hematology-oncology and urology. We have a fully developed commercial infrastructure that is responsible for the sales
and marketing of two drugs in the United States, namely Fusilev and Zevalin. Our lead developmental drug is apaziquone,
which is presently being studied in two large Phase 3 clinical trials for bladder cancer under a strategic
collaboration with Allergan Inc.
|
|
|
FUSILEV
(levoleucovorin) for injection (FUSILEV): A PDUFA target date of October 2009 has been established by the FDA for a decision
regarding the approval of our October 2008 sNDA filing for advanced metastatic colorectal
cancer which is currently under review by the FDA. We also expect expanded uptake of
FUSILEV in community practices and institutions, if the approval for colorectal cancer is
received from the FDA. |
|
|
|
ZEVALIN® ([90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan) (ZEVALIN):. In December 2008,
the FDA accepted for filing and review, and granted priority review status for RITs
sBLA for the use of ZEVALIN as first-line
therapy for patients with B-cell follicular NHL. A PDUFA
target date of July 2, 2009 was established by the FDA for a decision regarding this sBLA
which, if approved, will allow for the label to address a substantially larger patient
population. We also continue to work towards establishing
reimbursement standards with the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for ZEVALIN. |
|
|
|
Apaziquone (EOquin® in bladder cancer): We continue to enroll
patients into the two trials at sites in the United States and Canada and expect enrollment
in both trials to be completed by the end of 2009. We also plan to initiate trials by the end of the year in BCG-failure bladder cancer. |
|
|
|
We expect to continue to evaluate additional promising drug product candidates, as well
as marketed products, for opportunistic acquisition or license. |
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our current business operations do not generate sufficient operating cash to finance the
clinical development of our drug product candidates. Our cumulative losses, since inception in 1987
through March 31, 2009, are approximately $260 million. We expect to continue to incur additional
losses for at least the next few years, as we implement our growth strategy of commercializing
FUSILEV and ZEVALIN, while continuing to develop our portfolio of late-stage drug products, unless
they are offset, if at all, by the out-license of any of our drugs.
We
believe that the approximately $64 million in cash, cash
equivalents, marketable
securities and funds in escrow that we had on hand as of March 31, 2009 will allow us to fund our current planned
operations for at least the next twelve to eighteen months. Of the $64 million, as of March 31,
2009, we had $10 million in escrow as the remaining payment for CTIs 50% share in RIT. We also believe the financial institutions through which we have invested our funds are
strong, well capitalized and our instruments are held in accounts segregated from the assets of the
institutions. However, due to the current extremely volatile financial and credit markets and
liquidity crunch faced by most banking institutions, the financial viability of these institutions,
and the safety and liquidity of our funds is being constantly monitored.
Our long-term strategy, however, is to generate profits from the sale and licensing of our
drug products. Accordingly, in the next several years, we expect to supplement our cash position
with sales of FUSILEV and ZEVALIN and generate licensing revenues from out-licensing our other drug
products.
We may seek to obtain additional capital through the sale of debt or equity securities, if
necessary, especially in conjunction with opportunistic acquisitions or license of drugs. In this
regard, in April 2008, we filed a shelf registration statement
with the SEC in Form S-3 (No 333-150260) to give us the ability,
from time to time, to offer any combination of our securities described in the registration
statement in one or more offerings for up to $150 million. There can be no assurance that we will
be able to obtain such additional capital when needed, or, if available, that it will be on terms
favorable to us or to our stockholders. If additional funds are raised by issuing equity
securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders will be reduced, stockholders may
experience additional dilution or such equity securities may provide for rights, preferences or
privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock. If additional funds are raised
through the issuance of debt securities, the terms of such securities may place restrictions on our
ability to operate our business. If and when appropriate, just as we have done in the past, we may
pursue non-dilutive financing alternatives as well. However, from a revenue generation perspective,
we eventually hope to completely finance our operations from sales of our currently marketed
products.
20
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
We are not able to provide any revenue guidance at this time. For FUSILEV, our goal is to be
able to maintain current usage patterns, even though it appears that the leucovorin shortage may be
over. In addition, successful and continual growth of FUSILEV sales will largely depend upon
obtaining FDA approval for use of FUSILEV in combination with 5-FU containing regimens for the
treatment of colorectal cancer. For ZEVALIN, sales growth is largely dependent on obtaining FDA
approval of our sBLA for use in first-line consolidation treatment
for non-Hodgkins lymphoma or NHL, establishing
reimbursement standards based on an Average Sales Price (ASP) methodology in concert with CMS and
obtaining FDA approval to remove the In-111 bio-scan requirement. We are unable to reasonably
estimate when, if ever, we will realize sustainable net profit from sales of these two products or
any of our other products, if they are approved by the FDA.
In
addition, As described elsewhere in this report, as well as the risk factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, our drug development efforts are subject to the considerable
uncertainty inherent in any new drug development. Due to the uncertainties involved in progressing
through clinical trials, and the time and cost involved in obtaining regulatory approval and in
establishing collaborative arrangements, among other factors, we cannot reasonably estimate the
timing, completion dates, and ultimate aggregate cost of developing each of our drug product
candidates. Accordingly, the following discussion of our current assessment of expenditures may prove
inadequate and our assessment of the need for cash to fund our operations may prove too optimistic.
Our expenditures for research and development consist of direct product specific costs,
including, but not limited to, upfront license fees, milestone payments, active pharmaceutical
ingredients, clinical trials, and patent related costs, and non-product specific, or indirect,
costs. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, our total research and development
expenditure was approximately $5.7 million (net of
$2.7 million received from Allergan), of which
approximately $1.7 million was in direct
costs. The principal components of direct expenses for that period related to the development of
Apaziquone approximately $0.8 million; FUSILEV
approximately $0.5 million; and Zevalin approximately $0.3 million.
While we are currently focused on advancing our key product development programs, we
anticipate that we will make regular determinations as to which other programs, if any, to pursue
and how much funding to direct to each program on an ongoing basis in response to the scientific
and clinical success of each product candidate, as well as an ongoing assessment as to the product
candidates commercial potential.
Our
primary focus areas for the rest of 2009, and the programs that are expected to represent a
significant part of our expenditures, are the on-going clinical studies of Apaziquone and the
commercialization of FUSILEV and ZEVALIN. Key factors that we will monitor as we determine the
funding of other development projects are:
|
|
|
the continued commercialization of FUSILEV and ZEVALIN; |
|
|
|
continued patient enrollment in our 2 phase 3 Apaziquone clinical trials at anticipated
rates; and |
|
|
|
continued positive results from our preclinical studies and clinical trials. |
Further, while we do not receive any funding from third parties for research and development
that we conduct, co-development and out-licensing agreements with other companies for any of our
drug products may reduce our expenses. In this regard, we entered into a collaboration agreement
with Allergan whereby, commencing January 1, 2009, Allergan is bearing bear 65% of the future
development costs of Apaziquone.
In addition to our present portfolio of drug product candidates, we continually evaluate
proprietary products for acquisition. If we are successful in acquiring rights to additional
products, we may pay up-front licensing fees in cash and/or common stock and our research and
development expenditures would likely increase.
21
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Net Cash provided by Operating Activities
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, net cash from operations was approximately
$0.3 million compared to net cash used in operations of approximately $7.1 million in the
comparative period of 2008. The improvement in operating cash flows is primarily attributable to
revenues derived from sales of FUSILEV.
Net Cash provided by Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities of approximately $3.9 million was due to the
conversion of our marketable securities into shorter term
cash-equivalent investments, and for investment in ZEVALIN.
Results of Operations
Results of Operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three-month
period ended March 31, 2008
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we recorded net income of approximately $0.6
million, compared to a net loss of approximately $8.7 million for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2008. The principal components of the year-to-year changes in line items are discussed
below.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized
$2.1 million of licensing revenues from the
amortization of the $41.5 million upfront payment we received from Allergan in 2008. Also, during
the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded approximately $9.4 million (net of estimates for
promotional, price and other adjustments) of revenue of our proprietary oncology drug FUSILEV,
including adjustment of the allowance for product returns. As of December 31, 2008, we had deferred
the recognition of $3.1 million revenue for product returns,
until we were able to obtain more data on product sales and returns.
Based on the experience gained to date, we believe that as of
March 31, 2009, a product returns
reserve of $1.9 million is adequate, and accordingly recognized the difference of approximately
$1.2 million as a component of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Also, during the
three months ended March 31, 2009, net sales of ZEVALIN were approximately $2.6 million. While
the generic leucovorin shortage experienced in late 2008 and early 2009 appears to have abated, we
continue to expect to generate revenue from the sales of these two products during the remainder of
2009; however, we are not able to provide any revenue or net income guidance at this time. No revenues were
recorded in the period ended March 31, 2008.
Total research and development expenses, excluding amortization costs associated with ZEVALIN
described below, decreased by approximately $0.7 million, from approximately $6.4 million in the
three-month period ended March 31, 2008 to approximately $5.7 million in the three-month period
ended March 31, 2009, primarily due to the sharing in the costs associated with the development of
Apaziquone of approximately $2.7 million by our development partner, Allergan
Inc. (Allergan), partially
offset by higher R&D costs incurred for ZEVALIN of approximately
$1.2 million. We expect Research & Development expenses for
the remainder of 2009 to continue at a similar pace to the quarter
ended March 31, 2009.
We also incurred approximately $1.0 million non-cash research and development costs due to the
amortization of intangibles from the acquisition of ZEVALIN during the three month period ended
March 31, 2009. No similar cost was incurred during the same
period of 2008. We expect Research & Development expenses for
the remainder of 2009 to continue at a similar pace to the quarter
ended March 31, 2009.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $3.8 million, from
approximately $2.6 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 to approximately $6.4
million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009. The primary reason for the increase is due
to increased sales and marketing expenses, including employee compensation costs, incurred in
connection with the commercial activities associated with sales of
FUSILEV of approximately $1.7 million and
ZEVALIN of approximately $2.1 million. We expect selling, general and
administrative expenses for the remainder of 2009 to continue at a pace similar to the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Other income consisted of net interest income of approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million
for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in interest
income was primarily due to lower investment yields resulting from the general financial market
conditions and the higher emphasis on conservation and preservation of our capital. We expect
similar yields going forward till such time as the credit markets stabilize.
22
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
Contractual and Commercial Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual and other commitments, including obligations
under facility and equipment leases, as of March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Contractual Obligations (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations (2) |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations (3) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Obligations (4) |
|
|
17,236 |
|
|
|
11,857 |
|
|
|
4,287 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Milestone Obligations (5) |
|
|
84,241 |
|
|
|
14,021 |
|
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
7,023 |
|
|
$ |
58,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
101,784 |
|
|
$ |
26,036 |
|
|
$ |
8,913 |
|
|
$ |
8,161 |
|
|
$ |
58,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The table of contractual and commercial obligations excludes contingent payments that we may
become obligated to pay upon the occurrence of future events whose outcome is not readily
predictable, such as obligations pursuant to employment agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
The capital lease obligations are related to leased office equipment. |
|
(3) |
|
The operating lease obligations are primarily for the facility lease for our corporate
office, which extends through June 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
Purchase obligations represent the amount of open purchase orders and contractual commitments
to vendors for products and services that have not been delivered, or rendered, as of March
31, 2009. Over 90% of the purchase obligations consist of expenses associated with clinical
trials and related costs for Apaziquone and ZEVALIN for each of the periods presented.
|
|
(5) |
|
Milestone obligations are payable contingent upon successfully reaching certain development
and regulatory milestones. While the
amounts included in the table above represent all of our potential cash development and
regulatory milestone obligations as of March 31, 2009, given the unpredictability of the drug
development process, and the impossibility of predicting the success of current and future
clinical trials, the timelines estimated above do not represent a forecast of when payment
milestones will actually be reached, if at all. Rather, they assume that all development and
regulatory milestones under all of our license agreements are successfully met, and represent
our best estimates of the timelines. In the event that the milestones are met, we believe it
is likely that the increase in the potential value of the related drug product will
significantly exceed the amount of the milestone obligation. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
The estimation process requires assumptions to be made about future events and conditions, and is
consequently inherently subjective and uncertain. Actual results could differ materially from our
estimates. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including cash requirements, by
assessing: planned research and development activities and general and administrative requirements;
required clinical trial activity; market need for our drug candidates; and other major business
assumptions.
The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in managements view, most
important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and most demanding
of our judgment. We consider the following policies to be critical to an understanding of our
consolidated financial statements and the uncertainties associated with the complex judgments made
by us that could impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
23
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities primarily consist of bank checking deposits,
short-term treasury securities, and institutional money market funds, corporate debt and equity,
municipal obligations, including market auction debt securities, government agency notes, and
certificates of deposit. We classify highly liquid short-term investments, with insignificant
interest rate risk and maturities of 90 days or less at the time of acquisition, as cash and cash
equivalents. Other investments, which do not meet the above definition of cash equivalents, are
classified as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale marketable securities, in
accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Statement, or
SFAS, No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Investments that
we intend to hold for more than one year are classified as long-term investments.
Revenue Recognition
We follow the provisions as set forth by current accounting rules, which primarily include
Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104, Revenue Recognition, and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
No. 00-21, Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables. Generally, revenue is
recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, the price is fixed and determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Upfront fees representing non-refundable payments received upon the execution of licensing or
other agreements are recognized as revenue upon execution of the agreements where we have no
significant future performance obligations and collectibility of the fees is reasonably assured.
Milestone payments, which are generally based on developmental or regulatory events, are recognized
as revenue when the milestones are achieved, collectibility is reasonably assured, and we have no
significant future performance obligations in connection with the milestone. In those instances
where we have collected fees or milestone payments but have significant future performance
obligations related to the development of the drug product, we record deferred revenue and
recognize it over the period of our future obligations.
Revenue from sales of product is recognized upon shipment of product, when title and risk of
loss have transferred to the customer, and provisions for estimates, including promotional
adjustments, price adjustments, returns, and other potential adjustments are reasonably
determinable. Such revenue is recorded, net of such estimated provisions, at the minimum amount of
the customers obligation to us. We state the related accounts receivable at net realizable value,
with any allowance for doubtful accounts charged to general operating expenses. If revenue from
sales is not reasonably determinable due to provisions for estimates, promotional adjustments,
price adjustments, returns or any other potential adjustments, we defer the revenue and recognize
revenue when the estimates are reasonably determinable, even if the monies for the gross sales have
been received.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses include salaries and benefits, clinical trial and related
manufacturing costs, contract and other outside service fees, and facilities and overhead costs
related to our research and development efforts. Research and development expenses also consist of
costs incurred for proprietary and collaboration research and development and include activities
such as product registries and investigator-sponsored trials. In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs,
research and development costs are expensed as incurred. In certain instances we enter into
agreements with third parties for research and development activities, where we may prepay fees for
services at the initiation of the contract. In accordance with EITF 07-3, Accounting for
Nonrefundable Advance Payment for Goods or Services to be Used in Future Research and Development
Activities, we record such prepayment as a prepaid asset and charge research and development
expense over the period of time the contracted research and development services are performed. In
connection with the October 2008 codevelopment agreement, Allergan bears 65% of the development
costs incurred for Apaziquone in bladder cancer, commencing January 1, 2009. During the three
months ended March 31, 2009, approximately $2.7 million of development costs were reimbursed by
Allergan, and credited against total related research and development expense.
We review and accrue drug development expenses based on factors such as estimates of work
performed, patient enrollment, completion of patient studies and other events. Accrued clinical
study costs are subject to revisions as trials progress to completion. Revisions are recorded in
the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
Accounting for Share-Based Employee Compensation
In estimating the fair value of share-based compensation, we use the quoted market price of
our common stock for stock awards and the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model for stock options and
warrants. We estimate future volatility based on past volatility of our common stock, and we
estimate the expected length of options based on several criteria, including the vesting period of
the grant and the expected volatility.
24
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2: Recent Accounting Pronouncements of our accompanying consolidated financial
statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements that have a potentially
significant impact on our financial reporting and our expectations of their impact on our results
of operations and financial condition.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal, while at the same
time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. We do not utilize hedging contracts
or similar instruments.
We are exposed to certain market risks. Our primary exposures relate to (1) interest rate risk
on our investment portfolio, (2) credit risk of the companies bonds in which we invest, and (3)
general credit market risks as have existed since late 2007 and have become more prominent during
2008 and (4) the financial viability of the institutions which hold our capital and through which
we have invested our funds. We manage such risks on our investment portfolio by matching scheduled
investment maturities with our cash requirements and investing in highly rated instruments.
In response to the dislocation in the credit markets since the latter part of 2007, in early
2008 we converted substantially all of our investments, including all of our market auction debt
securities, into highly liquid and safe instruments. Our investments, as of March 31, 2009, were
primarily in money market accounts, short-term corporate bonds, U.S. Treasury bills and U.S.
Treasury-backed securities. We believe the financial institutions through which we have invested
our funds are strong, well capitalized and our instruments are held in accounts segregated from the
assets of the institutions. However, due to the current extremely volatile financial and credit
markets and liquidity crunch faced by most banking institutions, the financial viability of these
institutions, and the safety and liquidity of our funds is being constantly monitored.
Because of our ability to generally redeem these investments at par at short notice, changes
in interest rates would have an immaterial effect on the fair value of these investments. If a 10%
change in interest rates were to have occurred on March 31, 2009, any decline in the fair value of
our investments would not be material in the context of our financial statements. In addition, we
are exposed to certain market risks associated with credit ratings of corporations whose corporate
bonds we may purchase from time to time. If these companies were to experience a significant
detrimental change in their credit ratings, the fair market value of such corporate bonds may
significantly decrease. If these companies were to default on these corporate bonds, we may lose
part or all of our principal. We believe that we effectively manage this market risk by
diversifying our investments, and investing in highly rated securities.
In addition, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations relating to
payments we make to vendors, suppliers and license partners using foreign currencies. In
particular, some of our obligations are incurred in Euros. We mitigate such risk by maintaining a
limited portion of our cash in Euros and other currencies.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act), that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules
and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and Vice President of Finance (our
principal financial officer), as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management is
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of
assurance of reaching our desired disclosure control objectives.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer
and our principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of March 31, 2009, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2009.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended March 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
25
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
+ # |
|
Limited Liability Company Interest Assignment Agreement,
dated as of March 15, 2009, by and between the Registrant
and Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (Schedules and similar
attachments omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of
Regulation S-K. The Registrant will furnish supplementally
a copy of any omitted schedules or similar attachments to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.) |
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
+ |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
+ |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
+ |
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer; as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
+ |
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer; as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
# |
|
Confidential portions omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. |
|
+ |
|
Filed herewith. |
26
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|
|
Date: May 15, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Shyam K. Kumaria
|
|
|
|
Shyam K. Kumaria, |
|
|
|
Vice President, Finance
(Authorized Signatory and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
27
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
+ # |
|
Limited Liability Company Interest Assignment Agreement,
dated as of March 15, 2009, by and between the Registrant
and Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (Schedules and similar
attachments omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation
S-K. The Registrant will furnish supplementally a copy of
any omitted schedules or similar attachments to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon
request.) |
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
+ |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
+ |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
+ |
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer; as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
+ |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer; as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
# |
|
Confidential portions omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. |
|
+ |
|
Filed herewith. |
28