Blueprint
 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
            
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018
OR
 
            
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________ to ______________.
 
Commission File Number 001-11889
 
CEL-SCI CORPORATION
 
 Colorado
 
    84-0916344     
 State or other jurisdiction incorporation
 
 (IRS) Employer Identification Number
 
 8229 Boone Boulevard, Suite 802
 Vienna, Virginia 22182
 Address of principal executive offices
 
 (703) 506-9460
 Registrant's telephone number, including area code
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) had been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):
 
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Emerging growth company
 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  No
 
Class of Stock
 
 No. Shares Outstanding
 
Date
Common
 
16,895,106
 
May 14, 2018
 

 
 
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
 
Page
 
 
 
 
Condensed Balance Sheets at March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017 (unaudited)
3
 
 
 
 
Condensed Statements of Operations for the six months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited)
4
 
 
 
 
Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited)
5
 
 
 
 
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited)
6
 
   
 
 
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)
8
 
 
 
Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
23
 
 
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
25
 
 
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
25
 
 
 
PART II
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
26
 
 
 
Item 6.
Exhibits
26
 
 
 
 
Signatures
27
 
 
 
 
2
 
CEL-SCI CORPORATION
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 MARCH 31, 
 SEPTEMBER 30, 
ASSETS
 2018 
 2017 
 
   
   
Current Assets:
   
   
     Cash and cash equivalents
 $3,062,189 
 $2,369,438 
     Receivables
  136,783 
  218,481 
     Prepaid expenses
  879,592 
  826,429 
     Deposits - current portion
  - 
  150,000 
     Inventory used for R&D and manufacturing
  630,311 
  672,522 
 
    
    
Total current assets
  4,708,875 
  4,236,870 
 
    
    
Plant, property and equipment, net
  16,503,718 
  16,793,220 
Patent costs, net
  206,847 
  223,167 
Deposits
  1,670,917 
  1,670,917 
 
    
    
Total Assets
 $23,090,357 
 $22,924,174 
 
    
    
 
    
    
 
    
    
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
    
    
 
    
    
Current Liabilities:
    
    
  Accounts payable
 $7,687,172 
 $8,196,334 
  Accrued expenses
  902,732 
  936,698 
  Due to employees
  1,054,803 
  693,831 
  Notes payable
  1,176,660 
  994,258 
  Derivative instruments, current portion
  20,919 
  10,984 
  Other current liabilities
  14,576 
  12,449 
 
    
    
  Total current liabilities
  10,856,862 
  10,844,554 
 
    
    
  Derivative instruments, net of current portion
  1,835,898 
  2,042,418 
  Lease liability
  13,295,489 
  13,211,925 
  Deferred revenue
  125,000 
  125,000 
  Other liabilities
  35,383 
  37,254 
 
    
    
Total liabilities
  26,148,632 
  26,261,151 
 
    
    
Commitments and Contingencies
    
    
 
    
    
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
    
    
  Preferred stock, $.01 par value-200,000 shares authorized;
    
    
    -0- shares issued and outstanding
  - 
  - 
  Common stock, $.01 par value - 600,000,000 shares authorized;
    
    
    16,624,552 and 11,903,133 shares issued and outstanding
    
    
    at March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively
  166,246 
  119,031 
  Additional paid-in capital
  307,425,853 
  296,298,401 
  Accumulated deficit
  (310,650,374)
  (299,754,409)
 
    
    
Total stockholders' deficit
  (3,058,275)
  (3,336,977)
 
    
    
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
 $23,090,357 
 $22,924,174 
 
See notes to condensed financial statements.
 
 
3
 
 
CEL-SCI CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 and 2017
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 2018 
 2017 
 
   
   
Grant and other income
 $245,859 
 $34,433 
 
    
    
Operating Expenses:
    
    
  Research and development
  5,288,311 
  10,126,875 
  General & administrative
  4,074,723 
  2,752,123 
 
    
    
Total operating expenses
  9,363,034 
  12,878,998 
 
    
    
Operating loss
  (9,117,175)
  (12,844,565)
 
    
    
Gain on derivative instruments
  196,585 
  8,879,612 
 
    
    
Interest expense, net
  (1,975,375)
  (940,385)
 
    
    
Net loss available to common shareholders
 $(10,895,965)
 $(4,905,338)
 
    
    
 
    
    
Net loss per common share
    
    
      Basic
 $(0.81)
 $(0.74)
      Diluted
 $(0.81)
 $(0.78)
 
    
    
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    
    
      Basic
  13,403,878 
  6,649,814 
      Diluted
  13,403,878 
  6,682,592 
 
See notes to condensed financial statements.
 
 
4
 
 
CEL-SCI CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 and 2017
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 2018 
 2017 
 
   
   
Grant and other income
 $131,962 
 $17,175 
 
    
    
Operating Expenses:
    
    
  Research and development
  2,962,297 
  6,578,618 
  General & administrative
  1,375,410 
  1,345,114 
 
    
    
Total operating expenses
  4,337,707 
  7,923,732 
 
    
    
Operating loss
  (4,205,745)
  (7,906,557)
 
    
    
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
  1,154,815 
  (48,700)
 
    
    
Interest expense, net
  (1,657,205)
  (471,234)
 
    
    
Net loss available to common shareholders
 $(4,708,135)
 $(8,426,491)
 
    
    
 
    
    
Net loss per common share
    
    
      Basic and diluted
 $(0.31)
 $(1.15)
 
    
    
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    
    
      Basic and diluted
  15,210,296 
  7,319,761 
 
See notes to condensed financial statements.
 
 
5
 
 
CEL-SCI CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 and 2017
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 2018 
 2017 
 
   
   
Net loss
 $(10,895,965)
 $(4,905,338)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
    
    
    net cash used in operating activities:
    
    
      Depreciation and amortization
  308,259 
  318,357 
 Share-based payments for services
  157,991 
  112,778 
      Equity based compensation
  1,727,915 
  677,755 
      Common stock contributed to 401(k) plan
  72,400 
  76,426 
      Ergomed stock issuance
  1,247,400 
  - 
      Loss on retired equipment
  - 
  1,187 
      Gain on derivative instruments
  (196,585)
  (8,879,612)
      Amortization of debt discount
  1,023,084 
  - 
      Capitalized lease interest
  83,564 
  99,334 
      (Increase)/decrease in assets:
    
    
      Receivables
  81,698 
  84,922 
      Prepaid expenses
  42,748 
  219,543 
      Inventory used for R&D and manufacturing
  42,211 
  329,978 
      Deposits
  150,000 
  154,995 
      Increase/(decrease) in liabilities:
    
    
      Accounts payable
  (541,767)
  4,214,678 
      Accrued expenses
  (33,966)
  131,169 
      Due to employees
  360,972 
  140,511 
      Deferred rent liability
  2,638 
  (1,748)
 
    
    
Net cash used in operating activities
  (6,367,403)
  (7,225,065)
 
    
    
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
    
    
      Purchases of equipment
  - 
  (10,525)
      Expenditures for patent costs
  (1,113)
  - 
 
    
    
Net cash used in investing activities
  (1,113)
  (10,525)
 
    
    
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
    
    
     Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants
  7,065,137 
  5,849,444 
     Payments on obligations under capital lease
  (3,870)
  (2,048)
 
    
    
Net cash provided by financing activities
  7,061,267 
  5,847,396 
 
    
    
 NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
  692,751 
  (1,388,194)
 
    
    
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
  2,369,438 
  2,917,996 
 
    
    
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
 $3,062,189 
 $1,529,802 
 
See notes to condensed financial statements.
 
 
6
 
 
CEL-SCI CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 and 2017
 
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 2018 
 2017 
Decrease in receivable due under the litigation funding arrangement offset
   
   
  by the same amount payable to the legal firm providing the services
 $- 
 $305,341 
Capitalizable patent costs included in accounts payable
 $8,137 
 $8,644 
Capital lease obligation included in accounts payable
 $402 
 $1,500 
Property and equipment acquired through capital lease
 $- 
 $26,104 
Fair value of warrants issued in connection with public offering
 $- 
 $3,921,423 
Financing costs included in accounts payable
 $68,374 
 $118,866 
Prepaid consulting services paid with issuance of common stock
 $95,911 
 $(41,668)
Notes payable converted into common shares
 $184,300 
 $- 
 
    
    
 
    
    
  Cash paid for interest expense
 $872,087 
 $940,471 
 
See notes to condensed financial statements.
 
 
7
 
 
CEL-SCI CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017 (UNAUDITED)
 
A.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying condensed financial statements of CEL-SCI Corporation (the Company) are unaudited and certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. While management of the Company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, these interim condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017.
 
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements contain all accruals and adjustments (each of which is of a normal recurring nature) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of March 31, 2018 and the results of its operations for the six months then ended. The condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2017 is derived from the September 30, 2017 audited financial statements. Significant accounting policies have been consistently applied in the interim financial statements and the annual financial statements. The results of operations for the six and three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
 
The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, but due to recurring losses from operations and future liquidity needs, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Refer to discussion in Note B.
 
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
 
Research and Office Equipment and Leasehold Improvements - Research and office equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of five to seven years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the term of the lease. Repairs and maintenance which do not extend the life of the asset are expensed when incurred. The fixed assets are reviewed on a quarterly basis to determine if any of the assets are impaired.
 
Patents - Patent expenditures are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the expected useful life or the legal life of the patent (17 years). In the event changes in technology or other circumstances impair the value or life of the patent, appropriate adjustment in the asset value and period of amortization is made. An impairment loss is recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset, and from its disposition, is less than the carrying value of the asset. The amount of the impairment loss would be the difference between the estimated fair value of the asset and its carrying value.
 
Research and Development Costs - Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Management accrues CRO expenses and clinical trial study expenses based on services performed and relies on the CROs to provide estimates of those costs applicable to the completion stage of a study. Estimated accrued CRO costs are subject to revisions as such studies progress to completion. The Company charges revisions to estimated expense in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
 
Income Taxes - The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating and tax loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be recognized.  A full valuation allowance was recorded against the deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017.
 
 
8
 
 
On December 22, 2017, the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (the “Tax Act”:), was signed into law by the President of the United States (U.S.). The Tax Act includes significant changes to corporate taxation, including reduction of the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018, limitation of the tax deduction for interest expense to 30% of earnings (except for certain small businesses), limitation of the deduction for net operating losses to 80% of current year taxable income and elimination of net operating loss carrybacks. The Company has accounted for certain income tax effects of the Act in applying FASB ASC 740 to the current reporting period. Because the Company records a valuation allowance for its entire deferred income tax asset, there was no impact to the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements resulting from the Tax Act.
 
Derivative Instruments – The Company has entered into financing arrangements that consist of freestanding derivative instruments that contain embedded derivative features. The Company accounts for these arrangements in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP), derivative instruments and hybrid instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and are measured at fair value with gains or losses recognized in earnings depending on the nature of the derivative or hybrid instruments. The Company determines the fair value of derivative instruments and hybrid instruments based on available market data using appropriate valuation models giving consideration to all of the rights and obligations of each instrument. The derivative liabilities are re-measured at fair value at the end of each interim period.
 
Deferred Rent– Certain of the Company’s operating leases provide for minimum annual payments that adjust over the life of the lease.  The aggregate minimum annual payments are expensed on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. The Company recognizes a deferred rent liability for rent escalations when the amount of straight-line rent exceeds the lease payments, and reduces the deferred rent liability when the lease payments exceed the straight-line rent expense.  For tenant improvement allowances and rent holidays, the Company records a deferred rent liability and amortizes the deferred rent over the lease term as a reduction to rent expense.
 
Leases – Leases are categorized as either operating or capital leases at inception. Operating lease costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. An asset and a corresponding liability for the capital lease obligation are established for the cost of capital leases. The capital lease obligation is amortized over the life of the lease. For build-to-suit leases, the Company establishes an asset and liability for the estimated construction costs incurred to the extent that it is involved in the construction of structural improvements or takes construction risk prior to the commencement of the lease. Upon occupancy of facilities under build-to-suit leases, the Company assesses whether these arrangements qualify for sales recognition under the sale-leaseback accounting guidance. If a lease does not meet the criteria to qualify for a sale-leaseback transaction, the established asset and liability remain on the Company's balance sheet.
 
Stock-Based Compensation – Compensation cost for all stock-based awards is measured at fair value as of the grant date in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” The fair value of stock options is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model requires various judgmental assumptions including volatility and expected option life. The stock-based compensation cost is recognized on the straight line allocation method as expense over the requisite service or vesting period.
 
Equity instruments issued to non-employees are accounted for in accordance with ASC 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non Employees.” Accordingly, compensation is recognized when goods or services are received and is measured using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The Black-Scholes model requires various judgmental assumptions regarding the fair value of the equity instruments at the measurement date and the expected life of the options.
 
The Company has Incentive Stock Option Plans, Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans, a Stock Compensation Plan, Stock Bonus Plans and an Incentive Stock Bonus Plan. In some cases, these Plans are collectively referred to as the "Plans". All Plans have been approved by the stockholders.
 
The Company’s stock options are not transferable, and the actual value of the stock options that an employee may realize, if any, will depend on the excess of the market price on the date of exercise over the exercise price. The Company has based its assumption for stock price volatility on the variance of daily closing prices of the Company’s stock. The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on the U.S. Treasury rate at date of the grant with term equal to the expected life of the option. Forfeitures are accounted for when they occur. The expected term of options represents the period that options granted are expected to be outstanding and has been determined based on an analysis of historical exercise behavior. If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense for new awards may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.
 
 
9
 
 
Vesting of restricted stock granted under the Incentive Stock Bonus Plan is subject to service, performance and market conditions and meets the classification of equity awards. These awards were measured at market value on the grant-dates for issuances where the attainment of performance criteria is likely and at fair value on the grant-dates, using a Monte Carlo simulation for issuances where the attainment of performance criteria is uncertain. The total compensation cost will be expensed over the estimated requisite service period.
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), which affects any entity that changes the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award.  This Update amends the definition of modification by qualifying that modification accounting does not apply to changes to outstanding share-based payment awards that do not affect the total fair value, vesting requirements, or equity/liability classification of the awards.  The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for (1) public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-09 effective January 1, 2018. There was no impact on the financial position or results operations for the six and three months ended March 31, 2018.
 
In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), and Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in Part I of this Update change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down-round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down-round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down-round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down-round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded conversion options that have down-round features are now subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in Topic 260). The amendments in Part II of this Update re-characterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as pending content in the Accounting Standards Codification, to a scope exception. Those amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The amendments in Part I of this Update should be applied either retrospectively to outstanding financial instruments with a down-round feature by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the statement of financial position as of the beginning of the first fiscal year and interim period(s) in which the pending content that links to this paragraph is effective or retrospectively to outstanding financial instruments with a down-round feature for each prior reporting period presented in accordance with the guidance on accounting changes in paragraphs 250-10-45-5 through 45-10. The amendments in Part II of this Update do not require any transition guidance because those amendments do not have an accounting effect. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on its EPS calculations, as it does not have any free-standing equity based financial instruments with down-round provisions. 
 
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 850), the objective of which is to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. In addition, the amendments in this Update make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application and disclosure of the hedge accounting guidance in current general accepted accounting principles.  For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted in any period after issuance.  For cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption, an entity should apply a cumulative-effect adjustment related to eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year that an entity adopts the amendments in this Update. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
 
10
 
 
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which will require most long-term leases to be recognized on the balance sheet as an asset and a lease liability. Leases will be classified as an operating lease or a financing lease. Operating leases are expensed using the straight-line method whereas financing leases will be treated similarly to a capital lease under the current standard. The new standard will be effective for annual and interim periods, within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, but early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be presented using the modified retrospective method beginning with the earliest comparative period presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The guidance simplified the accounting and financial reporting of the income tax impact of share-based compensation arrangements. This guidance requires excess tax benefits to be recorded as a discrete item within income tax expense rather than additional paid-in-capital. In addition, excess tax benefits are required to be classified as cash from operating activities rather than cash from financing activities. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-09 effective October 1, 2017. The Company elected to apply the cash flow guidance of ASU 2016-09 retrospectively to all prior periods with no impact to historical periods. The Company also adopted a change in accounting policy to recognize forfeitures of awards as they occur instead of estimating potential forfeitures with no material impact on historical periods.
 
The Company has considered all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and does not believe the adoption of such pronouncements will have a material impact on its financial statements.
 
B.
OPERATIONS AND FINANCING
 
The Company has incurred significant costs since its inception for the acquisition of certain patented and unpatented proprietary technology and know-how relating to the human immunological defense system, patent applications, research and development, administrative costs, construction of laboratory facilities, and clinical trials.  The Company has funded such costs with proceeds from loans and the public and private sale of its common stock.  The Company will be required to raise additional capital or find additional long-term financing in order to continue with its research efforts.  To date, the Company has not generated any revenue from product sales. As a result, the Company has been dependent upon the proceeds from the sale of its securities to meet all of its liquidity and capital requirements and anticipates having to do so in the future.  The ability of the Company to complete the necessary clinical trials and obtain US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the sale of products to be developed on a commercial basis is uncertain. Ultimately, the Company must complete the development of its products, obtain the appropriate regulatory approvals and obtain sufficient revenues to support its cost structure.
 
The Company is currently running a large multi-national Phase 3 clinical trial for head and neck cancer with its partners TEVA Pharmaceuticals and Orient Europharma. During the six months ended March 31, 2018, the Company raised approximately $7.1 million in net proceeds from private offerings. To finance the study beyond the next twelve months, the Company plans to raise additional capital in the form of corporate partnerships, debt and/or equity financings. The Company believes that it will be able to obtain additional financing because it has done so consistently in the past and because Multikine is a product in the Phase 3 clinical trial stage. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising additional funds on a timely basis or that the funds will be available to the Company on acceptable terms or at all.  If the Company does not raise the necessary amounts of money, it may have to curtail its operations until such time as it is able to raise the required funding. The financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, but due to the Company’s negative working capital, stockholders’ deficit, recurring losses from operations and future liquidity needs, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
 
As of March 31, 2018, the Company has incurred expenses of approximately $48.7 million on direct costs for the Phase 3 clinical trial since its launch of the Phase 3 clinical trial for Multikine. The Company estimates it will incur additional expenses of approximately $10.5 million for the remainder of the Phase 3 clinical trial. This estimate is based only on the information currently available in the Company’s contracts with the Clinical Research Organizations responsible for managing the Phase 3 clinical trial and does not include other related costs, including manufacturing of the drug. This number may be affected by the rate of death accumulation in the study, foreign currency exchange rates and many other factors, some of which cannot be foreseen today. It is therefore possible that the cost of the Phase 3 clinical trial will be higher than currently estimated. Nine hundred twenty-eight (928) head and neck cancer patients have been enrolled and have completed treatment in the Phase 3 study. The study end point is a 10% increase in overall survival of patients between the two main comparator groups in favor of the group receiving the Multikine treatment regimen. The determination if the study end point is met will occur when there are a total of 298 deaths in those two groups.
 
 
11
 
 
The Company’s shareholders approved a reverse split of the Company’s common stock which became effective on the NYSE American on June 15, 2017. On that date, every twenty-five issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock automatically converted into one outstanding share of common stock. As a result of the reverse stock split, the number of outstanding shares of common stock decreased from 230,127,331 (pre-split) shares to 9,201,645 (post-split) shares. The reduction in the number of outstanding shares resulted in an increase in the Company’s loss per share by a factor of twenty-five, in all prior periods. The reverse stock split affected all stockholders of the Company’s common stock uniformly, and did not affect any stockholder’s percentage of ownership interest. The par value of the Company’s stock remained unchanged at $0.01 per share and the number of authorized shares of common stock remained the same after the reverse stock split.
 
C.
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
Stock options, stock bonuses and compensation granted by the Company as of March 31, 2018 are as follows:
 
Name of Plan
 Total Shares Reserved Under Plans 
 Shares Reserved for Outstanding Options 
 Shares Issued 
 Remaining Options/Shares Under Plans 
 
   
   
   
   
Incentive Stock Options Plans
  138,400 
  123,558 
  N/A 
  385 
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans
  1,187,200 
  1,100,814 
  N/A 
  45,341 
Stock Bonus Plans
  383,760 
  N/A 
  248,475 
  135,252 
Stock Compensation Plan
  134,000 
  N/A 
  115,590 
  18,410 
Incentive Stock Bonus Plan
  640,000 
  N/A 
  624,000 
  16,000 
 
Stock options, stock bonuses and compensation granted by the Company as of September 30, 2017 are as follows:
 
Name of Plan
 Total Shares Reserved Under Plans 
 Shares Reserved for Outstanding Options 
 Shares Issued 
 Remaining Options/Shares Under Plans 
 
   
   
   
   
Incentive Stock Option Plans
  138,400 
  124,758 
  N/A 
  454 
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans
  1,187,200 
  1,115,086 
  N/A 
  42,830 
Bonus Plans
  383,760 
  N/A 
  206,390 
  177,337 
Stock Compensation Plan
  134,000 
  N/A 
  115,590 
  18,410 
Incentive Stock Bonus Plan
  640,000 
  N/A 
  624,000 
  16,000 
 
Stock option activity:
 
 
 Six Months Ended March 31, 
 
 2018 
 2017 
Granted
  10,300 
  - 
Expired
  24,379 
  15,281 
Forfeited
  1,393 
  1,061 
 
 
 Three Months Ended March 31, 
 
 2018 
 2017 
Granted
  - 
  - 
Expired
  584 
  200 
Forfeited
  6,856 
  1,061 
 
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
 
 
 Six months Ended March 31, 
 
 2018 
 2017 
Employees
 $1,727,915 
 $677,755 
Non-employees
 $157,991 
 $112,778 
 
 
 
12
 
 
 
 Three months Ended March 31, 
 
 2018 
 2017 
Employees
 $279,817 
 $365,380 
Non-employees
 $115,649 
 $34,225 
 
Employee compensation expense includes the expense related to options issued or vested and restricted stock. The increase in employee’s expense in 2018 is primarily due to an increase of approximately $1.1 million in equity based compensation related to the Company’s shareholder approved 2014 Incentive Stock Bonus Plan. Non-employee expense includes the expense related to options and stock issued to consultants expensed over the period of their service contracts. Stock based compensation expense is included in general and administrative expenses on the statements of operations.
 
Warrants and Non-employee Options
 
The following chart presents the outstanding warrants and non-employee options, listed by expiration date at March 31, 2018:
 
Warrant
 
Issue Date
 
Shares Issuable upon Exercise of Warrants
 
Exercise Price
 
Expiration Date
 
Reference
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Series DD
 
12/8/2016
 
1,360,960
 
$4.50
 
7/1/2018
 
1
Series EE
 
12/8/2016
 
1,360,960
 
$4.50
 
7/1/2018
 
1
Series N
 
8/18/2008
 
85,339
 
$3.00
 
8/18/2018
 
*
Series S
 
10/11/13- 10/24/14
 
1,037,120
 
$3.00
 
10/11/2018
 
1
Series V
 
5/28/2015
 
810,127
 
$19.75
 
5/28/2020
 
1
Series W
 
10/28/2015
 
688,930
 
$16.75
 
10/28/2020
 
1
Series X
 
1/13/2016
 
120,000
 
$9.25
 
1/13/2021
 
*
Series Y
 
2/15/2016
 
26,000
 
$12.00
 
2/15/2021
 
*
Series ZZ
 
5/23/2016
 
20,000
 
$13.75
 
5/18/2021
 
1
Series BB
 
8/26/2016
 
16,000
 
$13.75
 
8/22/2021
 
1
Series Z
 
5/23/2016
 
264,000
 
$13.75
 
11/23/2021
 
1
Series FF
 
12/8/2016
 
68,048
 
$3.91
 
12/1/2021
 
1
Series CC
 
12/8/2016
 
680,480
 
$5.00
 
12/8/2021
 
1
Series HH
 
2/23/2017
 
20,000
 
$3.13
 
2/16/2022
 
1
Series AA
 
8/26/2016
 
200,000
 
$13.75
 
2/22/2022
 
1
Series JJ
 
3/14/2017
 
30,000
 
$3.13
 
3/8/2022
 
1
Series LL
 
4/30/2017
 
26,398
 
$3.59
 
4/30/2022
 
1
Series MM
 
6/22/2017
 
893,491
 
$1.86
 
6/22/2022
 
 *
Series NN
 
7/24/2017
 
539,300
 
$2.52
 
7/24/2022
 
 *
Series OO
 
7/31/2017
 
60,000
 
$2.52
 
7/31/2022
 
 *
Series QQ
 
8/22/2017
 
87,500
 
$2.50
 
8/22/2022
 
 *
Series GG
 
2/23/2017
 
400,000
 
$3.00
 
8/23/2022
 
1
Series II
 
3/14/2017
 
600,000
 
$3.00
 
9/14/2022
 
1
Series RR
 
10/30/2017
 
583,057
 
$1.65
 
10/30/2022
 
2
Series KK
 
5/3/2017
 
395,970
 
$3.04
 
11/3/2022
 
1
Series SS
 
12/19/2017
 
1,289,478
 
$2.09
 
12/18/2022
 
2
Series TT
 
2/5/2018
 
1,875,860
 
$2.24
 
2/5/2023
 
2
Series PP
 
8/28/2017
 
1,750,000
 
$2.30
 
2/28/2023
 
*
Consultants
 
7/1/15- 7/28/17
 
38,400
 
$2.18- $16.50
 
6/30/18- 7/27/27
 
3
*No current period changes occurred relating to these warrants.
 
 
13
 
 
1.
Derivative Liabilities
 
The table below presents the warrant liabilities and their respective balances at the balance sheet dates:
 
 
 March 31,
2018
 
 September 30,
2017
 
 
   
   
Series S warrants
 $20,847 
 $32,773 
Series V warrants
  76,457 
  72,912 
Series W warrants
  107,885 
  83,754 
Series Z warrants
  69,122 
  77,216 
Series ZZ warrants
  4,564 
  4,753 
Series AA warrants
  56,411 
  65,087 
Series BB warrants
  4,029 
  4,322 
Series CC warrants
  352,301 
  394,220 
Series DD warrants
  36 
  5,492 
Series EE warrants
  36 
  5,492 
Series FF warrants
  39,853 
  47,154 
Series GG warrants
  304,754 
  342,173 
Series HH warrants
  13,331 
  16,014 
Series II warrants
  461,028 
  511,636 
Series JJ warrants
  20,193 
  24,203 
Series KK warrants
  308,796 
  345,720 
Series LL warrants
  17,174 
  20,481 
 
    
    
Total warrant liabilities
 $1,856,817 
 $2,053,402 
 
The table below presents the gains and (losses) on the warrant liabilities for the six months ended March 31:
 
 
 2018 
 2017 
Series S Warrants
 $11,927 
 $2,579,836 
Series V warrants
  (3,547)
  1,417,721 
Series W warrants
  (24,131)
  1,609,415 
Series Z warrants
  8,095 
  828,263 
Series ZZ warrants
  189 
  61,195 
Series AA warrants
  8,676 
  646,665 
Series BB warrants
  293 
  50,338 
Series CC warrants
  41,919 
  429,869 
Series DD warrants
  5,456 
  413,948 
Series EE warrants
  5,456 
  512,238 
Series FF warrants
  7,301 
  47,166 
Series GG warrants
  37,419 
  108,211 
Series HH warrants
  2,683 
  5,340 
Series II warrants
  50,608 
  161,419 
Series JJ warrants
  4,010 
  7,988 
Series KK warrants
  36,924 
  - 
Series LL warrants
  3,307 
  - 
Net gain on warrant liabilities
 $196,585 
 $8,879,612 
 
 
14
 
 
The table below presents the gains and (losses) on the warrant liabilities for the three months ended March 31:
 
 
 2018 
 2017 
Series S Warrants
 $(1,141)
 $(41,485)
Series V warrants
  94,766 
  - 
Series W warrants
  105,336 
  (58,189)
Series Z warrants
  63,630 
  (40,524)
Series ZZ warrants
  3,532 
  (2,689)
Series AA warrants
  56,036 
  (32,904)
Series BB warrants
  2,924 
  (2,334)
Series CC warrants
  238,740 
  (174,623)
Series DD warrants
  (27)
  43,029 
Series EE warrants
  (27)
  (2,365)
Series FF warrants
  25,348 
  (19,574)
Series GG warrants
  152,551 
  108,211 
Series HH warrants
  8,345 
  5,340 
Series II warrants
  229,414 
  161,419 
Series JJ warrants
  12,552 
  7,988 
Series KK warrants
  151,951 
  - 
Series LL warrants
  10,885 
  - 
Net gain (loss) on warrant liabilities
 $1,154,815 
 $(48,700)
 
The Company reviews all outstanding warrants in accordance with the requirements of ASC 815. This topic provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. The warrant agreements provide for adjustments to the exercise price for certain dilutive events. Under the provisions of ASC 815, the warrants are not considered indexed to the Company’s stock because future equity offerings or sales of the Company’s stock are not an input to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” option on equity shares, and equity classification is therefore precluded.
 
In accordance with ASC 815, derivative liabilities must be measured at fair value upon issuance and re-valued at the end of each reporting period through expiration. Any change in fair value between the respective reporting dates is recognized as a gain or loss in the accompanying statements of operations.
 
Changes in Liability Classified Warrants
 
On January 12, 2018, the exercise price of the Company’s outstanding Series S warrants that are publicly traded under the symbol “CVM WS” on the NYSE American, was changed to $3.00 per share for a three month period which will end on April 12, 2018. On April 3, 2018, the price was reduced to $1.75 and was extended through June 11, 2018. (See Note J, “Subsequent Events”). After this date, the exercise price will revert back to $31.25 per share of common stock. This modification was reflected in the fair value measurement of the warrants. Twenty-five (25) Series S warrants are required to purchase one share of common stock. The Series S warrants expire on October 11, 2018.
 
On February 23, 2018, the Company extended the expiration date of its Series DD and Series EE warrants to July 1, 2018. This modification was reflected in the fair value measurement of the warrants.
 
On October 17, 2017, 17,821 Series U warrants, with an exercise price of $43.75 expired. The fair value of the Series U warrants was $0 on the date of expiration.
 
On December 6, 2016, 105,000 Series R warrants, with an exercise price of $100.00, expired. The fair value of the Series R warrants was $0 on the date of expiration.
 
2.
Issuance of Equity Warrants
 
Series TT Warrants
 
On February 5, 2018, the Company sold 2,501,145 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.87 per share for total proceeds of approximately $4.7 million. The common stock is restricted unless registered. The purchasers of the common stock also received Series TT warrants which allow the purchasers to acquire up to 1,875,860 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrants are exercisable at a fixed price of $2.24 per share, will not be exercisable for 6 months and one day and expire on February 5, 2023. Shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrants are restricted securities unless registered. The shares and warrants were registered on February 28, 2018. The Company allocated the proceeds received to the shares and the Series TT warrants on a relative fair value basis. As a result of such allocation, the Company determined the relative fair value of the Series TT warrants to be approximately $1.56 million. The Series TT warrants qualify for equity treatment in accordance with ASC 815.
 
Series SS Warrants
 
On December 19, 2017 the Company received subscription agreements for the purchase of 1,289,478 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.90 in the principal amount of $2.45 million.  The purchasers of the common stock also received Series SS warrants which allow the purchasers to acquire up to 1,289,478 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The warrants are exercisable at a fixed price of $2.09 per share, are exercisable on June 20, 2018 and will expire on December 18, 2022. Shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrants will be restricted securities unless registered. The shares and warrants were registered on January 23, 2018. The Company allocated the proceeds received to the shares and the Series SS warrants on a relative fair value basis. As a result of such allocation, the Company determined the relative fair value of the Series SS warrants to be approximately $1.0 million. The Series SS warrants qualify for equity treatment in accordance with ASC 815.
 
 
15
 
 
Series RR Warrants  
 
On October 30, 2017, holders of convertible notes in the principal amount of $1.1 million issued in June 2017 and holders of convertible notes in the principal amount of $1.2 million issued in July 2017 agreed to extend the maturity date of these notes to September 21, 2018.  In consideration for the extension of the maturity date of the convertible notes, the Company issued a total of 583,057 Series RR warrants to the convertible note holders that agreed to the extension.  Each Series RR warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock.  The Series RR warrants may be exercised at any time on or before October 30, 2022 at an exercise price of $1.65 per share. The Series RR warrants were recorded at approximately $0.7 million, the relative fair value on the date of issuance, as described in Note F.
 
3. 
Options and shares issued to Consultants
 
The Company typically enters into consulting arrangements in exchange for common stock or stock options. During the six and three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company issued 137,787 and 124,082 shares of common stock respectively, all of which were restricted shares. During the six and three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued 18,999 and 4,100 shares of common stock, respectively, of which 10,800 and 0 were restricted shares. The weighted average grant date fair value of the shares issued to consultants during the six months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, was $1.84 and $4.45 respectively. The aggregate values of the issuances of restricted common stock and common stock options are recorded as prepaid expenses and are charged to general and administrative expenses over the periods of service.
 
During the six and three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recorded total expense of approximately $158,000 and $116,000, respectively, relating to these consulting agreements. During the six and three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recorded total expense of approximately $113,000 and $34,000, respectively, relating to these consulting agreements. At March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017, approximately $141,000 and $45,000, respectively, are included in prepaid expenses. As of March 31, 2018, the Company had 38,400 options outstanding, which were issued to consultants as payment for services. All off these options were vested and all were issued from the Non-Qualified Stock Option plans.
 
Other Equity Transactions
 
Effective January 1, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Ergomed plc, the Company’s Clinical Research Provider, to facilitate a partial payment of the accounts payable balances due Ergomed. Under the Agreement, the Company issued Ergomed 660,000 shares, with a fair market value of approximately $1.3 million, as a forbearance fee in exchange for Ergomed’s agreement to provisionally forbear collection of the payables in an amount equal to the net proceeds from the resales of the shares issued to Ergomed. During the quarter ended March 31, 2018, the Company recorded the full amount of the expense upon issuance, offset by amounts realized through the resale by Ergomed of 269,333 shares for approximately $0.5 million and the corresponding reduction of the payables resulting in a net expense of approximately $0.8 million. As of March 31, 2018, Ergomed holds the remaining 390,667 shares and may resell the shares or return the shares to the Company for cancellation until December 31, 2018.
 
On August 15, 2017, the Company entered into a similar Securities Purchase Agreement with Ergomed plc, whereby the Company issued Ergomed 480,000 shares, with a fair market value of approximately $1.3 million, as a forbearance fee in exchange for Ergomed’s agreement to provisionally forbear collection of the payables in an amount equal to the net proceeds from the resales of the shares issued to Ergomed. During the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded the full amount of the expense upon issuance, offset by amounts realized through the resale of 64,792 shares and the corresponding reduction of the payables, for a net expense of $1.2 million. During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, the Company realized approximately $0.7 million through the resale of the remaining 415,208 shares and reduced the payables and interest expense by that amount.
 
D.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
In accordance with ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements,” the Company determines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company generally applies the income approach to determine fair value. This method uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount. The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations with respect to those future amounts.
 
 
16
 
 
ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The Company classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
 
● 
Level 1 – Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
 
● 
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and amounts derived from valuation models where all significant inputs are observable in active markets
 
● 
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s assumptions
 
For disclosure purposes, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety in the fair value hierarchy level based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the overall fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
 
The table below sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by input level, in the condensed balance sheet at March 31, 2018:
 
 
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1) 
 Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) 
 Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
 Total 
 
   
   
   
   
Derivative instruments
 $20,846 
 $- 
 $1,835,971 
 $1,856,817 
 
The table below sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by input level, in the condensed balance sheet at September 30, 2017:
 
 
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1) 
 Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) 
 Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
 Total 
 
   
   
   
   
Derivative instruments
 $32,773 
 $- 
 $2,020,629 
 $2,053,402 
  
The following sets forth the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances related to fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended March 31, 2018 and the year ended September 30, 2017:
 
 
 6 months ended 
 12 months ended 
 
 March 31,
2018
 
 September 30,
2017
 
 
   
   
Beginning balance
 $2,020,629 
 $5,283,573 
Issuances
  - 
  4,665,683 
Realized and unrealized gains
  (184,658)
  (7,928,627)
Ending balance
 $1,835,971 
 $2,020,629 
 
The fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments disclosed above under Level 3 are primarily derived from valuation models where significant inputs such as historical price and volatility of the Company’s stock, as well as U.S. Treasury Bill rates, are observable in active markets.
 
 
17
 
 
E.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
On July 24, 2017, the Company issued convertible notes (Series NN Notes) in the aggregate principal amount of $1.2 million to 12 individual investors. A trust in which Geert Kersten, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, holds a beneficial interest participated in the offering and purchased a note in the principal amount of $250,000. Patricia B. Prichep, the Company’s Senior Vice President of Operations, participated in the offering and purchased a note in the principal amount of $25,000. The terms of the trust’s note and Ms. Prichep’s note were identical to the other participants. The number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued upon conversion will be determined by dividing the principal amount to be converted by $2.29, which would result in the issuance of 109,170 shares to the trust and 10,917 shares to Ms. Prichep upon conversion. Along with the other purchasers of the convertible notes, the trust and Ms. Prichep also received Series NN warrants to purchase up to 109,170 and 10,917 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock. The Series NN warrants are exercisable at a fixed price of $2.52 per share and expire on July 24, 2022. Shares issuable upon the exercise of the notes and warrants were restricted securities unless registered. The shares were registered effective September 1, 2017.
 
On June 22, 2017, CEL-SCI issued convertible notes (Series MM Notes) in the aggregate principal amount of $1.5 million to six individual investors. Geert Kersten, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, participated in the offering and purchased a note in the principal amount of $250,000. The terms of Mr. Kersten’s note were identical to the other participants. The number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued upon conversion will be determined by dividing the principal amount to be converted by $1.69, which would result in the issuance of 147,929 shares to Mr. Kersten upon conversion. Along with the other purchasers of the convertible notes, Mr. Kersten also received Series MM warrants to purchase up to 147,929 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Series MM warrants are exercisable at a fixed price of $1.86 per share and expire on June 22, 2022. Shares issuable upon the exercise of the notes and warrants were restricted securities unless registered. The shares were registered effective August 8, 2017.
 
On October 30, 2017, the due dates of the Series NN and Series MM Notes were extended from December 22, 2017 to September 21, 2018 in exchange for Series RR warrants. Mr. Kersten, the Trust and Ms. Prichep received 73,965, 54,585 and 5,459 Series RR warrants, respectively. See Note F.
 
Approximately $9,000 in accrued interest was due the officers at March 31, 2018. No interest payments were made to officers during the six months ended March 31, 2018.
 
F.
NOTES PAYABLE
 
On October 30, 2017, the Company extended the due dates of the Series MM and Series NN Notes (the “Notes”) from December 22, 2017 to September 21, 20l8, and issued the note holders 583,057 of Series RR Warrants. The Series RR warrants expire on October 30, 2022 and are exercisable at a price of $1.65 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on October 27, 2017. These Series RR warrants are classified as equity warrants and are recorded at approximately $0.7 million, the fair value on the date of issuance.
 
Because the Company is experiencing financial difficulties and the creditors granted the Company a concession they would not have otherwise considered in the form of a lower effective interest rate, this modification was accounted for under ASC 470-60, “Troubled Debt Restructuring.” The Company calculated the future cash flows of the restructured debt to be greater than the carrying value of the debt and accounted for the change in debt prospectively, using the effective interest rate that equated the carrying amount to the future cash flows. The carrying value of the debt on the date of restructuring was approximately $0.7 million, which was net of a discount of approximately $1.6 million. The discount is being amortized to interest expense over the life of the Notes using the effective interest method. During the six and three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recorded approximately $1.0 and $0.4 million in interest expense, respectively, relating to the amortization of the debt discount. As of March 31, 2018, after conversions, the carrying value of the Notes is approximately $1.2 million, net of a discount of approximately $1.0 million. The Notes bear interest at 4% and can be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed conversion rate of $1.69 for the Series MM Notes and $2.29 for the Series NN Notes.
 
During the six months ended March 31, 2018, note holders converted notes in the principal amount of $184,300, into 88,124 shares of common stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, note holders converted notes in the principal amount of $109,300, into 55,373 shares of common stock. The unamortized debt discounts relating to the converted Notes were charged to interest expense.
 
 
18
 
 
The Series MM and Series NN Notes are secured by a first lien on all of the Company’s assets.
 
G.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
  
Clinical Research Agreements
 
In March 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with Aptiv Solutions, Inc. (which was subsequently acquired by ICON Inc.) to provide certain clinical research services in accordance with a master service agreement. The Company will reimburse ICON for costs incurred. The agreement required the Company to make $600,000 in advance payments which are being credited against future invoices in $150,000 annual increments through December 2017. As of March 31, 2018, all advance payments have been expensed.
 
In April 2013, the Company entered into a co-development and revenue sharing agreement with Ergomed. Under the agreement, Ergomed will contribute up to $10 million towards the Company’s Phase 3 Clinical Trial in the form of offering discounted clinical services in exchange for a single digit percentage of milestone and royalty payments, up to a specific maximum amount. In October 2015, the Company entered into a second co-development and revenue sharing agreement with Ergomed for an additional $2 million, for a total of $12 million. The Company accounted for the co-development and revenue sharing agreement in accordance with ASC 808 “Collaborative Arrangements”. The Company determined the payments to Ergomed are within the scope of ASC 730 “Research and Development.” Therefore, the Company records the discount on the clinical services as a credit to research and development expense on its Statements of Operations. Since the Company entered into the co-development and revenue sharing agreement with Ergomed, it has incurred research and development expenses of approximately $26.6 million related to Ergomed’s services. This amount is net of Ergomed’s discount of approximately $8.9 million. During the six and three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recorded, net of Ergomed’s discount, approximately $1.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively, as research and development expense related to Ergomed’s services. During the six and three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recorded, net of Ergomed’s discount, approximately $4.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively, as research and development expense related to Ergomed’s services.
 
The Company is currently involved in a pending arbitration proceeding, CEL-SCI Corporation v. inVentiv Health Clinical, LLC (f/k/a PharmaNet LLC) and PharmaNet GmbH (f/k/a PharmaNet AG). The Company initiated the proceedings against inVentiv Health Clinical, LLC, or inVentiv, the former third-party CRO, and is seeking payment for damages related to inVentiv’s prior involvement in the Phase 3 clinical trial of Multikine. In the summer of 2017, inVentiv Health, Inc., the ultimate parent company of the respondents in the arbitration, merged with INC Research Holdings, Inc. The combined company was renamed Syneos Health in January 2018. The arbitration claim, initiated under the Commercial Rules of the American Arbitration Association, alleges (i) breach of contract, (ii) fraud in the inducement, and (iii) common law fraud. Currently, the Company is seeking at least $50 million in damages in its amended statement of claim.
 
In an amended statement of claim, the Company asserted the claims set forth above as well as an additional claim for professional malpractice.  The arbitrator subsequently granted inVentiv’s motion to dismiss the professional malpractice claim based on the “economic loss doctrine” which, under New Jersey law, is a legal doctrine that, under certain circumstances, prohibits bringing a negligence-based claim alongside a claim for breach of contract.  The arbitrator denied the remainder of inVentiv’s motion, which had sought to dismiss certain other aspects of the amended statement of claim.  In particular, the arbitrator rejected inVentiv’s argument that several aspects of the amended statement of claim were beyond the arbitrator’s jurisdiction.
  
In connection with the pending arbitration proceedings, inVentiv has asserted counterclaims against the Company for (i) breach of contract, seeking at least $2 million in damages for services allegedly performed by inVentiv; (ii) breach of contract, seeking at least $1 million in damages for the alleged use of inVentiv’s name in connection with publications and promotions in violation of the parties’ contract; (iii) opportunistic breach, restitution and unjust enrichment, seeking at least $20 million in disgorgement of alleged unjust profits allegedly made by the Company as a result of the purported breaches referenced in subsection (ii); and (iv) defamation, seeking at least $1 million in damages for allegedly defamatory statements made about inVentiv. The Company believes inVentiv’s counterclaims are meritless and has defended against them. However, if such defense is unsuccessful, and inVentiv successfully asserts any of its counterclaims, such an adverse determination could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results, financial condition and liquidity.
 
 
19
 
 
In October 2015, the Company signed an arbitration funding agreement with a company established by Lake Whillans Litigation Finance, LLC, a firm specializing in funding litigation expenses. Pursuant to the agreement, an affiliate of Lake Whillans provided the Company with up to $5 million in funding for litigation expenses to support its arbitration claims against inVentiv. The funding was available to the Company to fund the expenses of the ongoing arbitration and will only be repaid if the Company receives proceeds from the arbitration. All related legal fees are directly billed to and paid by Lake Whillans. As part of the agreement with Lake Whillans, the law firm agreed to cap its fees and expenses for the arbitration at $5 million.
 
The hearing (the “trial”) started on September 26, 2016. The last witness in the arbitration hearing testified on November 8, 2017, and no further witnesses or testimony are expected. With that final witness, the testimony phase of the arbitration concluded. All that remained after November 8, 2017 at the trial level were closing statements and post-trial submissions. Closing arguments in the arbitration against the former clinical research organization (CRO) for our Phase 3 trial concluded on April 25, 2018. The parties are now awaiting a decision from the arbitrator.
 
Lease Agreements
 
The Company leases a manufacturing facility near Baltimore, Maryland (the San Tomas lease). The building was remodeled in accordance with the Company’s specifications so that it can be used by the Company to manufacture Multikine for the Company’s Phase 3 clinical trial and sales of the drug if approved by the FDA. The lease is for a term of twenty years and requires annual base rent to escalate each year at 3%. The Company is required to pay all real estate and personal property taxes, insurance premiums, maintenance expenses, repair costs and utilities. The lease allows the Company, at its election, to extend the lease for two ten-year periods or to purchase the building at the end of the 20-year lease. The Company contributed approximately $9.3 million towards the tenant-directed improvements, of which $3.2 million is being refunded during years six through twenty through reduced rental payments. The landlord paid approximately $11.9 million towards the purchase of the building, land and the tenant-directed improvements. The Company placed the building in service in October 2008.
 
The Company was deemed to be the owner of the building for accounting purpose under the build-to-suit guidance in ASC 840-40-55. In addition to tenant improvements the Company incurred, the Company also recorded an asset for tenant-directed improvements and for the costs paid by the lessor to purchase the building and to perform improvements, as well as a corresponding liability for the landlord costs. Upon completion of the improvements, the Company did not meet the “sale-leaseback” criteria under ASC 840-40-25, Accounting for Lease, Sale-Leaseback Transactions, and therefore, treated the lease as a financing obligation. Thus, the asset and corresponding liability were not de-recognized. As of March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017, the leased building asset has a net book value of approximately $16.4 and $16.6 million, respectively, and the landlord liability has a balance of approximately $13.3 and $13.2 million, respectively. The leased building is being depreciated using a straight line method over the 20 year lease term to a residual value. Depreciation on the leased building was approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the six and three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. Accumulated depreciation was approximately $4.8 million and $4.6 million as of March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively. The landlord liability is being amortized over the 20 years using the effective interest method. Lease payments allocated to the landlord liability are accounted for as debt service payments on that liability using the finance method of accounting per ASC 840-40-55.
 
The Company was required to deposit the equivalent of one year of base rent in accordance with the lease. When the Company meets the minimum cash balance required by the lease, the deposit will be returned to the Company. The approximate $1.7 million deposit is included in non-current assets at March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017.
 
 Approximate future minimum lease payments under the San Tomas lease as of March 31, 2018 are as follows:
 
 Six months ending September 30, 2018   
 $876,000 
 Year ending September 30,
    
 2019
  1,808,000 
 2020
  1,872,000 
 2021
  1,937,000 
 2022
  2,004,000 
 2023
  2,073,000 
 Thereafter
  11,685,000 
 Total future minimum lease obligation
  22,255,000 
 Less imputed interest on financing obligation
  (8,960,000)
 Net present value of lease financing obligation
 $13,295,000 
 
 
 
20
 
 
The Company subleases a portion of its rental space on a month-to-month term lease, which requires a 30 day notice for termination. The Company receives approximately $6,000 per month in rent for the sub-leased space.
 
The Company leases its research and development laboratory under a 60 month lease which expires February 28, 2022. The operating lease includes escalating rental payments. The Company is recognizing the related rent expense on a straight-line basis over the full 60 month term of the lease at the rate of approximately $13,000 per month. As of March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017, the Company has recorded a deferred rent liability of approximately $9,000 and $5,000, respectively.
 
The Company leases its office headquarters under a 60 month lease which expires June 30, 2020. The operating lease includes escalating rental payments. The Company is recognizing the related rent expense on a straight line basis over the full 60 month term of the lease at the rate approximately $8,000 per month. As of March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017, the Company has recorded a deferred rent liability of approximately $16,000 and $18,000, respectively.
 
As of March 31, 2018, material contractual obligations, excluding the San Tomas lease, consisting of non-cancelable operating lease payments are as follows:
 
Six months ending September 30, 2018
 $127,000 
Year ending September 30,
    
2019
  258,000 
2020
  238,000 
2021
  163,000 
2022
  69,000 
Total
 $855,000 
 
The Company leases office equipment under a capital lease arrangement. The term of the capital lease is 60 months and expires on October 31, 2021. The monthly lease payment is $505. The lease bears interest at approximately 6.25% per annum.
 
H.      PATENTS
 
During the six and three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, no patent impairment charges were recorded. For the six and three months ended March 31, 2018, amortization of patent costs totaled approximately $19,000 and $9,000, respectively. For the six and three months ended March 31, 2017 amortization of patent costs totaled approximately $19,000 and $10,000, respectively. Approximate estimated future amortization expense is as follows:
 
Six months ending September 30, 2018
 $18,000 
Year ending September 30,
    
2019
  35,000 
2020
  32,000 
2021
  29,000 
2022
  25,000 
2023
  15,000 
Thereafter
  53,000 
Total
 $207,000 
 
 
21
 
 
I. LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
 
The following table provides the details of the basic and diluted loss per-share computations:
 
 
 Six months ended March 31, 
 Three months ended March 31, 
 
 2018 
 2017 
 2018 
 2017 
Loss per share - basic
   
   
   
   
Net loss available to common shareholders - basic
 $(10,895,965)
 $(4,905,338)
 $(4,708,135)
 $(8,426,491)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
  13,403,878 
  6,649,814 
  15,210,296 
  7,319,761 
Basic loss per common share
 $(0.81)
 $(0.74)
 $(0.31)
 $(1.15)
 
    
    
    
    
Loss per share - diluted
    
    
    
    
Net loss available to common shareholders - basic
 $(10,895,965)
 $(4,905,338)
 $(4,708,135)
 $(8,426,491)
Gain on derivatives
  - 
  (330,124)
  - 
  - 
Net loss available to common shareholders - diluted
 $(10,895,965)
 $(5,235,462)
 $(4,708,135)
 $(8,426,491)
 
    
    
    
    
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
  13,403,878 
  6,649,814 
  15,210,296 
  7,319,761 
Incremental shares underlying dilutive "in the money" warrants (1)
  - 
  32,778 
  - 
  - 
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted
  13,403,878 
  6,682,592 
  15,210,296 
  7,319,761 
Diluted loss per common share
 $(0.81)
 $(0.78)
 $(0.31)
 $(1.15)
 
    
    
    
    
 (1) Includes series FF, GG, HH, II and JJ for the six months ended March 31, 2017
    
    
    
 
The gain on derivatives priced lower than the average market price during the period is excluded from the numerator and the related shares are excluded from the denominator in calculating diluted loss per share.
 
In accordance with the contingently issuable shares guidance of FASB ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share, the calculation of diluted net earnings (loss) per share excludes the following securities because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive as of March 31:
 
 
 2018 
 2017 
 
   
   
Options and Warrants
  12,381,730 
  8,037,799 
Unvested Restricted Stock
  312,000 
  604,000 
Convertible debt
  1,077,982 
  - 
Total
  13,771,712 
  8,641,799 
 
J. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
On April 3, 2018, the exercise price of the Company’s outstanding Series S warrants, which are publicly traded under the symbol “CVM WS” on the NYSE American, was changed to $1.75 per share for a two month period which will end on June 11, 2018. The exercise price had previously been changed to $3.00 for a three month temporary period ending on April 12, 2018. After June 11, 2018, the exercise price will revert back to $31.25 per share of common stock. Twenty-five (25) Series S warrants are required to purchase one share of common stock. The Series S warrants expire on October 11, 2018.
 
Closing arguments in the arbitration against the former clinical research organization (CRO) for our Phase 3 trial concluded on April 25, 2018. The parties are now awaiting a decision from the arbitrator.
 
22
 
 
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
 Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
The Company’s lead investigational therapy, Multikine® (Leukocyte Interleukin, Injection), is cleared for a Phase 3 clinical trial in advanced primary head and neck cancer. Multikine has been cleared by the regulators in twenty four countries around the world, including the U.S. FDA.
 
Multikine (Leukocyte Interleukin, Injection) is the full name of this investigational therapy, which, for simplicity, is referred to in the remainder of this report as Multikine. Multikine is the trademark that the Company has registered for this investigational therapy, and this proprietary name is subject to FDA review in connection with the Company’s future anticipated regulatory submission for approval. Multikine has not been licensed or approved by the FDA or any other regulatory agency. Neither has its safety or efficacy been established for any use.
 
The Company also owns and is developing a pre-clinical technology called LEAPS (Ligand Epitope Antigen Presentation System).
 
All of the Company’s projects are under development. As a result, the Company cannot predict when it will be able to generate any revenue from the sale of any of its products.
 
Since inception, the Company has financed its operations through the sale of equity securities, convertible notes, loans and certain research grants. The Company’s expenses will continue to exceed its revenues as it continues the development of Multikine and brings other drug candidates into clinical trials. Until such time as the Company becomes profitable, any or all of these financing vehicles or others may be utilized to assist the Company’s capital requirements.
 
 Capital raised by the Company has been expended primarily for patent applications, research and development, administrative costs, and the construction of the Company’s laboratory facilities. The Company does not anticipate realizing significant revenues until it enters into licensing arrangements regarding its technology and know-how or until it receives regulatory approval to sell its products (which could take a number of years). As a result the Company has been dependent upon the proceeds from the sale of its securities to meet all of its liquidity and capital requirements and anticipates having to do so in the future.
 
The Company will be required to raise additional capital or find additional long-term financing in order to continue with its research efforts. The ability to raise capital may be dependent upon market conditions that are outside the control of the Company. The ability of the Company to complete the necessary clinical trials and obtain FDA approval for the sale of products to be developed on a commercial basis is uncertain. Ultimately, the Company must complete the development of its products, obtain the appropriate regulatory approvals and obtain sufficient revenues to support its cost structure. The Company is taking cost-cutting initiatives, as well as exploring other sources of funding to finance operations over the next 12 months. However there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise sufficient capital to support its operations.
 
Since the Company launched its Phase 3 clinical trial for Multikine, the Company has incurred expenses of approximately $48.7 million as of March 31, 2018 on direct costs for the Phase 3 clinical trial. The Company estimates it will incur additional expenses of approximately $10.5 million for the remainder of the Phase 3 clinical trial. This estimate is based only on the information currently available in the Company’s contracts with the Clinical Research Organizations responsible for managing the Phase 3 clinical trial and does not include other related costs, such as the manufacturing of the drug. This number may be affected by the rate of death accumulation in the study, foreign currency exchange rates, and many other factors, some of which cannot be foreseen today. It is therefore possible that the cost of the Phase 3 clinical trial will be higher than currently estimated.
 
In April 2013, the Company announced that it had replaced the CRO running its Phase 3 clinical trial. This was necessary since the patient enrollment in the study dropped off substantially following a takeover of the CRO which caused most of the members of the CRO’s study team to leave the CRO. The Company announced that it had hired two CRO’s who will manage the global Phase 3 study; ICON and Ergomed, who are both international leaders in managing oncology trials. Both CRO’s helped the Company expand the trial to over 80 clinical sites globally. The study is now fully enrolled with 928 patients.
 
 
23
 
 
Under a co-development agreement, Ergomed will contribute up to $12 million towards the study where it will perform clinical services in exchange for a single digit percentage of milestone and royalty payments, up to a specified maximum amount, only from sales for head and neck cancer.
 
During the six months ended March 31, 2018, the Company’s cash increased by approximately $0.7 million.  Significant components of this increase include net proceeds from the sale of the Company’s stock of approximately $7.1 million offset by net cash used to fund the Company’s regular operations, including its Phase 3 clinical trial, of approximately $6.4 million. During the six months ended March 31, 2017, the Company’s cash decreased by approximately $1.4 million.  Significant components of this decrease include net proceeds from the sale of the Company’s stock of approximately $5.8 million offset by net cash used to fund the Company’s regular operations, including its Phase 3 clinical trial, of approximately $7.2 million, purchases of equipment of approximately $10,000 and payments on capital leases of approximately $2,000.
 
On February 5, 2018, the Company sold 2,501,145 shares common stock at a price of $1.87 for total proceeds of approximately $4.7 million. The purchasers of the common stock also received Series TT warrants which allow the purchasers to acquire up to 1,875,860 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrants are exercisable on August 6, 2018 at a fixed price of $2.24 per share and expire on February 5, 2023.
 
On December 19, 2017, the Company sold 1,289,478 shares of common stock at a price of $1.90 for total proceeds of approximately of $2.45 million.  The purchasers of the common stock received Series SS warrants which allow the purchasers to acquire 1,289,478 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The warrants are exercisable at a fixed price of $2.09 per share, are exercisable on June 20, 2018 and will expire on December 18, 2022.
 
Inventory at March 31, 2018 remained constant, only decreasing by approximately $42,000 as compared to September 30, 2017. In addition, receivables decreased by approximately $82,000, primarily due to the timing of payments by the Company’s partners for reimbursed clinical study costs related to the Phase 3 clinical trial.
 
Results of Operations and Financial Condition
 
During the six months ended March 31, 2018, research and development expenses decreased by approximately $4.8 million compared to the six months ended March 31, 2017. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, research and development expenses decreased by approximately $3.6 million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017. The majority of the Company’s research and development expense relates to its on-going Phase 3 clinical trial. Clinical trial costs tend to be higher during the enrollment phase of the study and because the study is fully enrolled, the expenses incurred over the last six months have decreased.
 
During the six months ended March 31, 2018, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $1.3 million compared to the six months ended March 31, 2017. This increase is primarily due to an increase of approximately $1.0 million in equity based compensation related to the Company’s shareholder approved 2014 Incentive Stock Bonus Plan, and a net increase of approximately $0.3 million in other general and administrative expenses primarily for accounting fees and public relations services. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, general and administrative expenses remained constant with expenses incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2017.
 
The gain on derivative instruments of approximately $0.2 million and $1.2 million for the six and three months ended March 31, 2018, respectively, were the result of the change in fair value of the derivative liabilities during the respective periods. These changes were caused by fluctuation in the share price of the Company’s common stock. The gain on derivative instruments of approximately $8.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017 and the loss on derivative instruments of approximately $49,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were the result of the change in fair value of the derivative liabilities during the respective periods. These changes were caused by fluctuations in the share price of the Company’s common stock.
 
Net interest expense increased by approximately $1.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the six months ended March 31, 2017. The increase is primarily due to additional interest items that were not in effect during the six months ended March 31, 2017. These items include approximately $1.0 million relating to the amortization of discounts on notes payable issued in June and July 2017 and restructured in October 2017 and accrued interest on those notes. The current period impact of the financing arrangement with Ergomed (as explained in Note C to the financial statements which are part of this report) which was de minimus as the $1.3 million value of the shares issued and charged to interest expense in January 2018 was offset by $1.3 million recovered upon resale of those shares and shares issued in the August 2017 Agreement discussed in Note C Net interest expense increased by approximately $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase is primarily due to additional interest items that were not in effect during the three months ended March 31, 2017. These items include approximately $0.4 million relating to the amortization of the discounts on notes payable and the accrued interest on those notes, and approximately $0.8 million in net interest expense relating to the financing arrangement with Ergomed (as explained in Note C to the financial statements which are part of this report) The $1.3 million value of the shares issued and charged to interest expense in January 2018 was offset by approximately $0.5 million in proceeds from the resale of the shares, resulting in a net charge to interest expense of approximately $0.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018.
 
 
24
 
 
Research and Development Expenses
 
The Company’s research and development efforts during the six months ended March 31, 2018 involved Multikine and LEAPS. The table below shows the research and development expenses associated with each project.
 
 
 Six months ended March 31, 
 Three months ended March 31, 
 
 2018 
 2017 
 2018 
 2017 
MULTIKINE
 $4,989,721 
 $9,950,673 
 $2,769,787 
 $6,487,667 
LEAPS
  298,590 
  176,202 
  192,510 
  90,951 
TOTAL
 $5,288,311 
 $10,126,875 
 $2,962,297 
 $6,578,618 
 
Clinical and other studies necessary to obtain regulatory approval of a new drug involve significant costs and require several years to complete. The extent of the Company’s clinical trials and research programs are primarily based upon the amount of capital available to the Company and the extent to which the Company has received regulatory approvals for clinical trials. The inability of the Company to conduct clinical trials or research, whether due to a lack of capital or regulatory approval, will prevent the Company from completing the studies and research required to obtain regulatory approval for any products which the Company is developing. Without regulatory approval, the Company will be unable to sell any of its products. Since all of the Company’s projects are under development, the Company cannot predict when it will be able to generate any revenue from the sale of any of its products.
 
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
 
Management’s discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations is based on its unaudited condensed financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements is based on the selection of accounting policies and the application of significant accounting estimates, some of which require management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and notes. The Company believes some of the more critical estimates and policies that affect its financial condition and results of operations are in the areas of operating leases and stock-based compensation. For more information regarding the Company’s critical accounting estimates and policies, see Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017. The application of these critical accounting policies and estimates has been discussed with the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.
 
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
 
The Company does not believe that it has any significant exposures to market risk.
 
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Under the direction and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2018. The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance of reaching its desired disclosure control objectives. Based on the evaluation, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2018.
 
 Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, has made changes to the Company’s Internal Controls to address the material weaknesses as discussed in the Company’s September 30, 2017 10-K.
  
 
25
 
 
PART II
 
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
 
During the six months ended March 31, 2018 the Company issued 137,787 restricted shares of common stock to consultants for investor relations services.
 
The Company relied upon the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the issuance of these shares. The individuals who acquired these shares were sophisticated investors and were provided full information regarding the Company’s business and operations. There was no general solicitation in connection with the offer or sale of these securities. The individuals who acquired these shares acquired them for their own accounts. The certificates representing these shares bear a restricted legend providing that they cannot be sold except pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from registration. No commission or other form of remuneration was given to any person in connection with the issuance of these shares.
 
Item 6. Exhibits
 
Number 
 
Exhibit
 
 
 
 
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
 
 
 
 
Section 1350 Certifications
 
 
 
26
 
 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
CEL-SCI CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
 
Date: May 15, 2018
By:  
/s/  Geert Kersten
 
 
 
Geert Kersten 
 
 
 
Principal Executive Officer* 
 
 
  
* Also signing in the capacity of the Principal Accounting and Financial Officer.
 
 
 
 
27