UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT
TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One)
|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
OR
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission file number 1-07265
AMBASE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 95-2962743
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
100 Putnam Green, 3rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830-6027
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (203) 532-2000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock ($0.01 par value)
Rights to Purchase Common Stock
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer,
as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No X
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No X
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to the
Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See definition of "accelerated filer", "large accelerated filer", and "smaller
reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer Accelerated Filer Non-Accelerated Filer X Smaller
Reporting Company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No X
At February 29, 2008, there were 43,858,664 shares of registrant's Common
Stock outstanding. At June 29, 2007 the aggregate market value of registrant's
voting securities (consisting of its Common Stock) held by nonaffiliates of the
registrant, based on the average bid and asking price on such date of the Common
Stock of $0.47 per share, was approximately $13 million. The Common Stock
constitutes registrant's only outstanding class of security.
Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which Proxy Statement the registrant intends to file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the
close of its fiscal year, is incorporated by reference with respect to certain
information contained therein, in Part III of this Annual Report.
The Exhibit Index is located in Part IV, Item 15, Page 48.
AmBase Corporation
Annual Report on Form 10-K
December 31, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
---------------------------------------------- ------
PART I
Item 1. Business............................................................................................1
Item 1A. Risk Factors........................................................................................2
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments...........................................................................5
Item 2. Properties..........................................................................................5
Item 3. Legal Proceedings...................................................................................5
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.................................................5
Executive Officers of the Registrant................................................................5
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of
Equity Securities.................................................................................6
Item 5. Performance Graph...................................................................................7
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.............................................................................8
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations........................................................................................8
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.........................................15
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data........................................................16
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.......................................................................................45
Item 9AT. Controls and Procedures............................................................................45
Item 9B. Other Information..................................................................................46
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.............................................46
Item 11. Executive Compensation.............................................................................46
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners & Management and Related
Stockholder Matters..............................................................................47
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence...........................47
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.............................................................47
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.........................................................48
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
AmBase Corporation (the "Company" or "AmBase") is a Delaware corporation
that was incorporated in 1975 by City Investing Company ("City"). AmBase is a
holding company that, through a wholly owned subsidiary, owns one commercial
office building in Greenwich, Connecticut that is managed and operated by the
Company. The building is approximately 14,500 square feet; with approximately
3,500 square feet utilized by the Company for its executive offices; the
remaining space is currently unoccupied and available for lease. The executive
office of the Company is located at 100 Putnam Green, Third Floor, Greenwich,
Connecticut 06830.
The Company's assets currently consist primarily of cash and cash
equivalents, investment securities, and real estate owned. The Company earns
non-operating revenue principally consisting of investment earnings on
investment securities and cash equivalents. The Company continues to evaluate a
number of possible acquisitions, and is engaged in the management of its assets
and liabilities, including the contingent assets associated with its legal
claims, as described in Part II - Item 8 - Notes 9 and 10 to the Company's
consolidated financial statements. From time to time, the Company and its
subsidiaries may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings. The
Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as
well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements. The Company had 6
employees at December 31, 2007.
In July 2005, the Company sold its 38,000 square foot office building at
Two Soundview Drive in Greenwich, Connecticut ("Two Soundview"). Accordingly,
the results of operations of Two Soundview have been retroactively reclassified
as discontinued operations in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the periods presented in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS 144").
See Part II - Item 8 - Note 13 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information.
Background
City originally incorporated AmBase as the holding company for The Home
Insurance Company, and its affiliated property and casualty insurance companies
("The Home"). In 1985, City, which owned all the outstanding shares of the
Common Stock of the Company, distributed the Company's shares to City's common
stockholders. The Home was sold in February 1991.
In August 1988, the Company acquired Carteret Bancorp Inc. Carteret Bancorp
Inc., through its principal wholly owned subsidiary, Carteret Savings Bank, FA
("Carteret"), was principally engaged in retail and consumer banking, and
mortgage banking including mortgage servicing. On December 4, 1992, the Office
of Thrift Supervision ("OTS") placed Carteret in receivership under the
management of the Resolution Trust Corporation ("RTC") and a new institution,
Carteret Federal Savings Bank, was established to assume the assets and certain
liabilities of Carteret. Following the seizure of Carteret, the Company was
deregistered as a savings and loan holding company by the OTS, although the OTS
retains jurisdiction for any regulatory violations prior to deregistration. See
Part II - Item 8 - Note 10 to the Company's consolidated financial statements
for a discussion of Supervisory Goodwill litigation relating to Carteret.
In December 1997, the Company formed a new wholly owned subsidiary, SDG
Financial Corp. ("SDG Financial"), to pursue merchant banking activities. SDG
Financial purchased an equity interest in SDG, Inc. ("SDG") and was granted the
exclusive right to act as the investment banking/financial advisor to SDG, Inc.
and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates. The Company also purchased
convertible preferred and common stock in AMDG, Inc. ("AMDG"), a majority owned
subsidiary of SDG. SDG and AMDG are development stage pharmaceutical companies.
In connection with a litigation settlement with SDG and AMDG, the Company
received $72,000 in April 2006. The Company remains a shareholder in SDG and
AMDG and will continue to monitor the status of SDG and its subsidiary, AMDG,
Inc. These investments have no current carrying value, as the Company's original
cost basis was previously written off.
STOCKHOLDER INQUIRIES
Stockholder inquiries, including requests for the following: (i) change of
address; (ii) replacement of lost stock certificates; (iii) Common Stock name
registration changes; (iv) Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; (v) Annual Reports on
Form 10-K; (vi) proxy material; and (vii) information regarding stockholdings,
should be directed to:
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
Attention: Shareholder Services
(800) 937-5449 or (718) 921-8200 Ext. 6820
As the Company does not maintain a website, copies of Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Proxy Statements can also be obtained
directly from the Company free of charge by sending a request to the Company by
mail as follows:
AmBase Corporation
100 Putnam Green, 3rd Floor
Greenwich, CT 06830
Attn: Shareholder Services
The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Accordingly, the Company's public
reports, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K
and Proxy Statements, can be obtained through the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") EDGAR Database available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
Materials filed with the SEC may also be read or copied by visiting the SEC's
Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on
the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling
1-800-SEC-0330.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The Company is subject to various risks, many of which are beyond the
Company's control, which could have a negative effect on the Company and its
financial condition. As a result of these and other factors, the Company may
experience material fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly or
annual basis, which could materially and adversely affect the Company's
business, financial condition, operating results and stock price. An investment
in the Company's stock involves various risks, including those mentioned below
and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this "Annual Report"), and
those that are detailed from time to time in the Company's other filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should carefully consider the
following risk factors, together with all of the other information included or
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report, before you decide whether to
purchase the Company's common stock.
The Company is a plaintiff in a legal proceeding seeking recovery of
damages for the loss of the Company's investment in Carteret. There can be no
assurances of a favorable outcome for the Company in this legal proceeding.
The Company is a plaintiff in a legal proceeding seeking recovery of
damages from the United States Government for the loss of the Company's wholly
owned subsidiary, Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. This legal proceeding was
commenced in 1993 and will likely continue for several more years. There have
been and may continue to be rulings in other "supervisory goodwill" cases which
have had and/or may have adverse affects on the Company's Supervisory Goodwill
proceeding. In addition, due to the extended length of time that proceedings,
rulings, trial decisions and possible appeals in this matter may take, it is not
possible for the Company to predict when this matter will be resolved or the
likelihood of a favorable outcome.
The Company is subject to risks inherent in owning and leasing real estate.
The Company is subject to varying degrees of risk generally related to
leasing and owning real estate many of which are beyond the Company's control.
In addition to general risks related to owning commercial real estate, the
Company's risks include, among others:
o deterioration in regional and local economic and real estate market
conditions,
o potential changes in supply of, or demand for rental properties similar
to the Company's, o competition for tenants and changes in rental rates,
o concentration in a single real estate asset and class,
o difficulty in reletting properties on favorable terms or at all,
o impairments in the Company's ability to collect rent payments when due,
o the potential for uninsured casualty and other losses,
o the impact of present or future environmental legislation and compliance
with environmental laws,
o adverse changes in zoning laws and other regulations,
o changes in federal or state tax laws, and
o acts of terrorism and war.
Each of these factors could cause a material adverse effect on the
Company's financial condition and results of operations. In addition, real
estate investments are relatively illiquid, which means that the Company's
ability to promptly sell the Company's property in response to changes in
economic and other conditions may be limited.
Property taxes on the Company's property may increase without notice.
The property the Company owns is subject to real property taxes. The real
property taxes on the Company's property and any other properties that the
Company acquires in the future may increase as property tax rates change and as
those properties are assessed or reassessed by tax authorities. To the extent
that the Company's available rental space remains unoccupied or future tenants
are unable or unwilling to pay such increase in accordance with their leases,
the Company's net operating expenses may increase.
The Company's business is concentrated in Southern Connecticut, and adverse
conditions in the region could negatively impact the Company's operations.
The Company's current operations are concentrated in Southern Connecticut,
specifically in the Greenwich area. As a result, the value of the Company's real
estate is dependent on the economic strength of that region. Because of the
Company's geographic concentration and its single property, the Company's
operations are more vulnerable to adverse changes in the Greenwich economy than
those of larger, more diversified companies. Should the Company experience
softening in the Company's market and not be able to offset the potential
negative market influences on price and volume, the Company's financial results
could be negatively impacted.
The Company is in a competitive business.
The real estate industry is highly competitive. The Company competes for
tenants for its unoccupied rental space with a large number of real estate
property owners and other companies that sublet properties. The Company's
principal means of competition are rents charged in relation to the income
producing potential of the location. In addition, the Company expects other
major real estate investors, some with much greater resources than the Company
has, may compete with us for attractive acquisition opportunities. These
competitors include REITs, investment banking firms and private institutional
investors. This competition has increased prices for commercial properties and
may impair the Company's ability to make suitable property acquisitions on
favorable terms in the future.
The Company's future cash flow is dependent on renewal of leases and
reletting of the Company's space.
The Company is subject to risks that its presently available rental space
may not be successfully rented, that financial distress of the Company's tenants
may lead to vacancies at the Company's property, that leases may not be renewed,
that locations may not be relet or that the terms of renewal or reletting
(including the cost of required renovations) may be less favorable than current
lease terms. In addition, numerous properties compete with the Company's
property in attracting tenants to lease space. The number of competitive
properties in a particular area could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's ability to lease the Company's property or newly acquired properties
and on the rents charged. If the Company were unable to promptly relet or renew
the leases for all or a substantial portion of this location, or if the rental
rates upon such renewal or reletting were significantly lower than expected, the
Company's cash flow could be adversely affected and the resale value of the
Company's property could decline.
The Company may not be able to insure certain risks economically.
The Company may experience economic harm if any damage to the Company's
property is not covered by insurance. The Company cannot be certain that the
Company will be able to insure all risks that the Company desires to insure
economically or that all of the Company's insurers will be financially viable if
the Company makes a claim. The Company may suffer losses that are not covered
under the Company's insurance policies. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess
of insured limits should occur, the Company could lose capital invested in a
property, as well as any future revenue from the property.
Changes in the composition of the Company's assets and liabilities through
acquisitions, divestitures or corporate restructuring may affect the Company's
results.
The Company may make future acquisitions or divestitures of assets or
changes in how such assets are held. Any change in the composition of the
Company's assets and liabilities or how such assets and liabilities are held
could significantly affect the Company's financial position and the risks that
the Company faces.
The Company may not be able to generate sufficient taxable income to fully
realize the Company's deferred tax asset.
The Company has federal income tax net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards
and other tax attributes. If the Company is unable to generate sufficient
taxable income, the Company may not be able to fully realize the benefit of the
NOL carryforwards.
Because the Company from time to time maintains a majority of its assets in
securities, the Company may in the future be deemed to be an investment company
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 resulting in additional costs and
regulatory burdens.
Currently, the Company believes that either it is not within the definition
of "Investment Company" as the term is defined under the Investment Company Act
of 1940 (the "1940 Act") or, alternatively may rely on one or more of the 1940
Act's exemptions. The Company intends to continue to conduct its operations in a
manner that will exempt the Company from the registration requirements of the
1940 Act. If the Company were to become deemed to be an investment company
because of the Company's investments securities holdings, the Company would be
required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act
places significant restrictions on the capital structure and corporate
governance of a registered investment company, and materially restricts its
ability to conduct transactions with affiliates. Compliance with the 1940 Act
could also increase the Company's operating costs. Such changes could have a
material adverse affect on the Company's business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may affect the market
on which the Company's common stock trades, the markets in which the Company
operate, the Company's operations and the Company's results of operations.
Terrorist attacks or armed conflicts could affect the Company's business or
the businesses of the Company's tenants. The consequences of armed conflicts are
unpredictable, and the Company may not be able to foresee events that could have
an adverse effect on the Company's business. More generally, any of these events
could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased
volatility in the U.S. and worldwide financial markets and economy. They also
could be a factor resulting in, or a continuation of, an economic recession in
the U.S. or abroad. Any of these occurrences could have a significant adverse
impact on the Company's operating results and revenues and may result in
volatility of the market price for the Company's common stock.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company owns one commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut.
The building is approximately 14,500 square feet and is available for lease to
unaffiliated third parties with approximately 3,500 square feet utilized by the
Company for its executive offices.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For a discussion of the Company's legal proceedings, including the
Company's Supervisory Goodwill litigation, see Part II - Item 8 - Note 10 to the
Company's consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Each executive officer is elected to serve in the executive officer
capacity set forth opposite his respective name until the next Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Other than those noted below, the Company is not aware of any
family relationships between any of the executive officers or directors of the
Company.
Set forth below is a list of executive officers of the Company at December
31, 2007:
Name Age Title
==== === ========
Richard A. Bianco 60 Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
John P. Ferrara 46 Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer
and Controller
Joseph R. Bianco 63 Treasurer
Mr. Bianco was elected a director of the Company in January 1991, and has
served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since May 1991.
On January 26, 1993, Mr. Bianco was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors
of the Company. He served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Carteret, then a subsidiary of the Company, from May 1991 to December 1992.
Mr. Ferrara was elected to the position of Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Controller of the Company in December 1995, having previously served
as Acting Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Vice President and
Controller since January 1995; as Assistant Vice President and Controller from
January 1992 to January 1995; and as Manager of Financial Reporting from
December 1988 to January 1992.
Mr. J. Bianco was elected to the position of Treasurer of the Company in
January 1998. He has dedicated his career to the financial services and
investment industry. Prior to his employment with the Company in 1996, he worked
for Merrill Lynch & Co. ("Merrill") as Vice President, responsible for Sales and
Marketing in the Merrill Global Securities Clearing from 1983 to 1996. Mr.
Joseph R. Bianco and Mr. Richard A. Bianco are related.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS,
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Common Stock of the Company trades through one or more market makers,
with quotations made available in the "pink sheets" published by the National
Quotation Bureau, Inc. ("Pink Sheets"), under the symbol ABCP. The sales prices
per share for the Company's Common Stock represent the range of the reported
high and low bid quotations as indicated in the Pink Sheets or as communicated
orally to the Company by market makers. Such prices reflect interdealer prices,
without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and may not necessarily
represent actual transactions.
2007 2006
===================== =====================
High Low High Low
==== === ==== ===
First Quarter....................... $ 0.59 $ 0.47 $ 0.63 $ 0.52
Second Quarter...................... 0.52 0.47 0.55 0.46
Third Quarter....................... 0.50 0.40 0.55 0.44
Fourth Quarter...................... 0.44 0.40 0.57 0.43
As of February 28, 2008, there were approximately 14,300 beneficial owners
of the Company's Common Stock. No dividends were declared or paid on the
Company's Common Stock in 2007 or 2006. The Company does not intend to declare
or pay dividends in the foreseeable future.
For information concerning the Company's stockholder rights plan, see Part
II - Item 8 - Note 5 to the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Common Stock Repurchase Plan
In January 2002, the Company announced a common stock repurchase plan (the
"Repurchase Plan") which allows for the repurchase by the Company of up to 10
million shares of its common stock in the open market.
The Repurchase Plan is conditioned upon favorable business conditions and
acceptable prices for the common stock. Purchases under the Repurchase Plan may
be made, from time to time, in the open market, through block trades or
otherwise. Depending on market conditions and other factors, purchases may be
commenced or suspended any time or from time to time without prior notice.
Average
Price Paid
Total per Share Total Number Maximum Number
Number of (including Shares Purchased Shares that may
Shares Broker as Part of Publicly yet be Purchased
Purchased Commissions) Announced Plans under the Plan
--------------- -------------- ------------------- ----------------
Beginning balance January 1, 2007......... - - 1,315,000 8,685,000
January 1, 2007 - January 31, 2007........ - - 1,315,000 8,685,000
February 1, 2007 - February 28, 2007...... - - 1,315,000 8,685,000
March 1, 2007 - March 31, 2007............ - - 1,315,000 8,685,000
April 1, 2007 - April 30, 2007............ 110,000 0.48 1,425,000 8,575,000
May 1, 2007 - May 31, 2007................ - - 1,425,000 8,575,000
June 1, 2007 - June 30, 2007.............. 100,000 0.49 1,525,000 8,475,000
July 1, 2007 - July 31, 2007.............. 50,000 0.48 1,575,000 8,525,000
August 1, 2007 - August 31, 2007.......... 26,844 0.44 1,601,844 8,398,156
September 1, 2007 - September 30, 2007.... 2,302 0.47 1,604,146 8,395,854
October 1, 2007 - October 31, 2007........ 214,509 0.43 1,818,655 8,181,345
November 1, 2007 - November 30, 2007...... 450,900 0.43 2,269,555 7,730,445
December 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007...... 155,300 0.42 2,424,855 7,575,145
------------
Total.................................... 1,109,855
============
During January, 2008, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 189,100
shares of common stock from unaffiliated parties at a purchase price, including
broker commissions, of $0.43 per share pursuant to the Company's Repurchase
Plan.
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the
Company's Common Stock for the past five years with the performance of the
Standard & Poor's 500 Financials Index (S&P 500 Financials) and the Standard &
Poor's 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) for that period. The graph assumes that a $100
investment was made in the Company's Common Stock and each of the indices at the
earliest date shown, and the dividends, if any, were reinvested. No dividends
have been paid by the Company over the past five (5) years. The stock price
performance shown in the graph below should not be considered indicative of
potential future stock price performance.
December 31
Company/Index 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
--------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
AmBase Corporation
100.00 73.86 87.50 59.66 56.82 45.45
--------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
S&P 500
Index 100.00 128.68 142.69 149.70 173.34 182.86
--------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
S&P 500 Financials
Index 100.00 131.03 145.30 154.71 184.41 150.05
--------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the
Company's consolidated financial statements included in Part II - Item 8 of this
Form 10-K. The consolidated statements of operations for the periods ended prior
to the July 2005 sale of Two Soundview were retroactively reclassified to
reflect the operations as discontinued operations.
Years ended December 31
=================================================================
(in thousands, except per share data) 2007 2006 2005 (a) 2004 2003
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
Operating revenue .......................... $ - $ 92 $ 170 $ 176 $ 320
Interest income............................. 1,305 1,846 1,034 505 334
======== ======== ======== ======= =======
Loss from continuing operations............. $ (3,936) $ (5,463) $ (5,519) $(4,696) $(5,102)
Income from discontinued operations......... - - 10,647 1,345 1,543
-------- -------- ------- -------- -------
Net income (loss).......................... $ (3,936) $ (5,463) $ 5,128 $(3,351) $(3,559)
======= ======== ======== ======== =======
Loss from continuing operations - Basic..... $ (0.09) $ (0.12) $ (0.12) $ (0.10) $ (0.11)
Income from discontinued operations - Basic. - - 0.23 0.03 0.03
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) per common share - Basic.. $ (0.09) $ (0.12) $ 0.11 $ (0.07) $ (0.08)
======= ======== ======== ======= =======
Dividends .................................. - - - - -
======= ======== ======== ======= =======
Total assets................................ $21,559 $ 42,148 $ 45,883 $40,860 $41,668
Total stockholders' equity.................. 20,578 24,667 29,682 25,574 29,367
======= ======== ======== ======= =======
(a) Net income in 2005 includes a $10,298,000 gain from the sale of Two
Soundview.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes, which are contained in Part II - Item 8, herein.
As a result of the sale of the Company's 38,000 square foot office building at
Two Soundview Drive in Greenwich, CT ("Two Soundview") in July 2005, the results
of operations of Two Soundview have been designated as discontinued operations,
and the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods presented herein
have been retroactively reclassified to report the income from discontinued
operations separately from the results of continuing operations by excluding the
operating revenues and expenses of discontinued operations from the respective
statement captions. See Part I - Item 8 - Note 13 for additional information
concerning the sale of Two Soundview.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
AmBase is a holding company which, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, owns
a commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut. The Company previously
owned an insurance company and a savings bank.
In February 1991, the Company sold its ownership interest in The Home
Insurance Company and its subsidiaries. On December 4, 1992, Carteret Savings
Bank, FA ("Carteret") was placed in receivership by the Office of Thrift
Supervision ("OTS").
The Company's assets currently consist primarily of cash and cash
equivalents, investment securities, and real estate owned. The Company earns
non-operating revenue principally consisting of investment earnings on
investment securities and cash equivalents. The Company continues to evaluate a
number of possible acquisitions and is engaged in the management of its assets
and liabilities, including the contingent assets associated with its legal
claims, as described in Part I - Item 1. From time to time, the Company and its
subsidiaries may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings. The
Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as
well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
The Company's assets at December 31, 2007, aggregated $21,559,000,
consisting principally of cash and cash equivalents of $2,894,000, investment
securities of $16,313,000 and real estate owned of $2,120,000. At December 31,
2007, the Company's liabilities aggregated $981,000. Total stockholders' equity
was $20,578,000.
Other assets at December 31, 2006 of $1,336,000 consisted principally of a
$1,201,000 interest refund due from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), which
was received by the Company in January 2007. This amount was recorded as other
income in the accompanying consolidated Statement of Operations for the year
ending December 31, 2006. See Results of Operations - Continuing Operation,
below for further information.
The Company previously sponsored a non tax-qualified supplemental
retirement plan, initially adopted by the Company in 1985, and as amended and
restated (the "Supplemental Plan"), under which only one current executive
officer of the Company was the sole participant. The cost of the Supplemental
Plan was previously accrued but not funded.
In accordance with an amendment to the Supplemental Plan, as previously
adopted in March 2006, the liability for the Supplemental Plan was fully
satisfied on May 31, 2007, by the lump-sum benefit payment of $16,676,115 (to
Mr. Bianco, the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer), and
immediately thereafter, the Supplemental Plan automatically terminated. The
lump-sum Supplemental Plan benefit payment to Mr. Bianco was paid from the
Company's available financial resources. After May 31, 2007, no further
Supplemental Plan expense was required to be recognized by the Company. See
Results of Operations below for further information regarding the Supplemental
Plan expense. For a further discussion of the Supplemental Plan termination and
Mr. Bianco's 2007 Employment Agreement, see Part II - Item 8 - Note 7 to the
Company's consolidated financial statements.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, cash of $19,116,000 was used by
continuing operations, primarily due to the payment of the Supplemental Plan
lump-sum benefit payment of $16,676,115, as further discussed above and to a
lesser extent the payment of operating expenses and prior year accruals,
partially offset by the receipt of interest income and investment earnings. The
cash needs of the Company for 2007 were principally satisfied by the Company's
financial resources and the receipt of investment earnings on investment
securities and cash equivalents. Management believes that the Company's capital
resources are sufficient to continue operations for the next twelve months.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, cash of $4,519,000 was used by
continuing operations, including the payment of operating expenses and prior
year accruals; partially offset by the receipt of interest income and investment
earnings. The cash needs of the Company for 2006 were principally satisfied by
interest income received on investment securities and cash equivalents and the
Company's financial resources.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, cash of $5,144,000 was used by
continuing operations, including the payment of operating expenses and prior
year accruals, partially offset by the receipt of rental income, interest income
and investment earnings. The cash needs of the Company for 2005 were principally
satisfied by rental income and investment earnings received on investment
securities and cash equivalents and the Company's financial resources. During
July 2005, the Company received $27,442,000 of net cash proceeds from the sale
of Two Soundview as further discussed in Part II - Item 8 - Note 13.
Real estate owned consists of a commercial office building in Greenwich,
Connecticut which the Company owns and manages. The building is approximately
14,500 square feet; approximately 3,500 square feet is utilized by the Company
for its executive offices; the remaining space is currently unoccupied and
available for lease.
Although the portion of the building not being utilized by the Company is
currently unoccupied and available for lease, based on the Company's analysis
including but not limited to current market rents in the area, leasing values,
and comparable property sales, the Company believes the property's fair market
value exceeds the property's current carrying value; and, therefore the carrying
value of the property as of December 31, 2007, has not been impaired.
See Part II - Item 8 - Note 13 for further information concerning the sale
of the Company's 38,000 square foot building in July 2005. A gain from the sale,
of approximately $10.3 million, is reflected in the Company's Statement of
Operations for the year ending December 31, 2005.
Pursuant to the Company's Repurchase Plan, the Company repurchased, from
unaffiliated parties, an aggregate of 1,109,855 shares of common stock during
the year ended December 31, 2007, at various dates, at market prices at their
time of purchase for an aggregate cost of $489,000. See Part II - Item 8 - Note
5 for further details with regard to the Company's purchases of common stock
pursuant to its common stock repurchase plan. There are no material commitments
for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2007. Inflation has had no material
impact on the business and operations of the Company.
The Company continues to evaluate a number of possible acquisitions, and is
engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities, including the
contingent assets. Discussions and negotiations are ongoing with respect to
certain of these matters. The Company intends to aggressively contest all
litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to
settlements. For a discussion of lawsuits and proceedings, including a
discussion of the Supervisory Goodwill litigation, see Part II - Item 8 - Note
10 to the Company's consolidated financial statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continuing Operations
In 2007, the Company earned non-operating revenue consisting principally of
investment earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents; the Company
had no operating revenue in 2007. The Company's management expects that
operating cash needs for the next twelve months is currently anticipated to be
met principally by the receipt of investment earnings on investment securities
and cash equivalents, and the Company's current financial resources. The
Company's main source of operating revenue in 2006 and 2005 was rental income
earned on real estate owned.
The Company recorded a loss from continuing operations of $3,936,000 or
$0.09 per share for the year ended December 31, 2007; $5,463,000 or $0.12 per
share for the year ended December 31, 2006; and $5,519,000 or $0.12 per share
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
No rental income was earned by the Company in 2007. Rental income from real
estate owned in 2006 and 2005 relates to the Company's remaining property and
was $92,000 in 2006 compared to $170,000 in 2005. The decreased amounts in the
2007 period, compared to the 2006 period, is due to unoccupied office space
currently available for lease, versus partial occupancy in the same 2006 period.
The decreased amount of $92,000 in 2006, compared to $170,000 in 2005, is
principally the result of a decrease in rental income received in 2006 compared
to 2005 due to unoccupied office space during the last half of 2006, versus
occupancy in 2005.
Compensation and benefits decreased to $2,911,000 in 2007 from $4,778,000
in 2006, and from $4,212,000 in 2005. Included in compensation and benefits is
an accrual for the Supplemental Plan of $868,000 for 2007, $2,539,000 for 2006,
and $2,087,000 for 2005. The decrease in compensation and benefits in 2007
compared to 2006 and 2005 is primarily due to the significant decrease in the
Supplemental Plan expense in 2007, as a result of the Supplemental Plan
termination as of May 31, 2007, as further described below and to a lesser
extent, a lower level of incentive compensation accruals in 2007.
As a result of the termination of the Supplemental Plan, after May 31,
2007, no further Supplemental Plan expense was required to be recognized by the
Company. The increase in compensation and benefits in 2006 versus 2005 is
principally due to a $452,000 increase in the Supplemental Plan accrual as
discussed below, and to a lesser extent, an increase resulting from the
recognition of stock option expense of $88,000 in 2006, in accordance with the
recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment," ("SFAS 123R"). The Supplemental Plan
expense reflects recognition of an expense of $394,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2007, recorded to increase the Supplemental Plan liability to the
present value of the May 31, 2007 lump-sum payment amount of $16,676,115,
utilizing a 5.75% discount rate factor based on the 2007 Employment Agreement
between the Company and Mr. Bianco and the amendment of the Supplemental Plan.
An additional Supplemental Plan expense of $474,000 in the year ended
December 31, 2007, and $852,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 was
recorded to amortize the Supplemental Plan minimum pension liability adjustment.
The minimum pension liability adjustment, which was included as a component of
stockholders' equity within accumulated other comprehensive loss in the
Company's consolidated financial statements, was $1,326,000 as of March 31,
2006, and was amortized on a straight line basis over the 14-month period from
April 1, 2006, through May 31, 2007, as an additional Supplemental Plan expense
of $284,000 per quarter. The amortization of the additional minimum pension
liability in the 2007 and 2006 periods, although recorded as a component of
compensation expense in the Company's consolidated statement of operations, did
not result in a decrease in total stockholders' equity, as its recognition
results in an increase in one component and a corresponding decrease in another
component of stockholders' equity. In connection with the Supplemental Plan
lump-sum benefit payment, the Company paid approximately $242,000 of employer
Medicare taxes, which are included as a component of compensation and benefits
expense in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007. See Part II - Item 8 - Notes 6 and 7 to the Company's
consolidated financial statements for further information.
The increased Supplemental Plan expense of $2,539,000 in 2006 compared to
$2,087,000 in 2005 is due to recognition of an expense of $1,687,000, comprised
of an expense of $1,224,000 recorded to increase the Supplemental Plan liability
to reflect the December 31, 2006 present value of the anticipated May 31, 2007
lump-sum payment amount of $16,676,115, utilizing a 5.75% discount rate factor
based on the 2007 Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. Bianco and
the amendment of the Supplemental Plan as further described in Part II - Item 8
- Note 7 to the Company's consolidated financial statements, and an expense of
$463,000 to reflect actuarially determined pension costs.
The Company adopted SFAS 123R effective on January 1, 2006. In accordance
with SFAS 123R, the Company has applied the "modified prospective" method in
which compensation cost for stock options is recognized beginning with the
effective date. No stock based compensation expense was recorded for the year
ended December 31, 2007, as all previously granted outstanding options vested as
of January 2, 2007. No stock option awards have been granted since January 2005.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recorded $88,000 of
compensation expense relating to stock options. In accordance with the "modified
prospective" method, no compensation expense relating to stock options was
recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005. For further information regarding
the Company's adoption of SFAS 123R and its impact on the Company's financial
statements, see Part II - Item 8 - Note 8 to the Company's consolidated
financial statements.
Professional and outside services decreased to $2,195,000 in 2007 from
$2,655,000 in 2006 and from $2,003,000 in 2005. The decrease in the 2007 period
to $2,195,000 from $2,655,000 in 2006 is principally the result of a lower level
of legal fees in 2007, relating to the Supervisory Goodwill litigation and to a
lesser extent, a lower level of other corporate professional fees. During 2007,
Supervisory Goodwill fees were principally attributable to expert report
preparation costs, expert depositions of the Company's and the Government's
witnesses and overall trial preparations costs in anticipation of the February
2008 Supervisory Goodwill trial. The increase in the 2006 period of $2,655,000
from $2,003,000 in 2005 is principally the result of higher legal fees relating
to the Supervisory Goodwill litigation as a result of discovery, brief
preparation and expert's reports relating to the Show Cause hearing and to a
lesser extent, other corporate professional fees. See Part II - Item 8 - Note 10
to the Company's consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the
Supervisory Goodwill litigation proceedings.
Property operating and maintenance expenses were $122,000 in 2007, $123,000
in 2006, and $124,000 in 2005. Although the 2007 property operating and
maintenance expenses includes increased utility costs, the overall expense
amount was in line with prior years as a result of overall cost reduction
measures.
Interest income was $1,305,000 in 2007, $1,846,000 in 2006, and $1,034,000
in 2005. The decrease in 2007 compared to 2006 is principally due to a lower
level of cash equivalents and investments securities as a result of the
Supplemental Plan lump-sum benefit payment, as further described in Part I -
Item 1, Note 7 to the Company's consolidated financial statements offset
slightly by an increased yield on investments due to rising interest rates. The
payment decreased the Company's cash equivalents and investment securities by
approximately $16.7 million, resulting in a decrease in the interest income
earned by the Company beginning in June 2007. See Item 3 - Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk for information concerning the
Company's weighted average interest rate yield on investment securities. The
increase in 2006 compared to 2005 is principally due to an increase in the
aggregate amount of cash equivalents and investment securities invested for the
full year of 2006, as a result of the cash proceeds received in connection with
the July 2005 sale of real estate owned, and to a lesser extent, an increased
yield on investments due to rising interest rates.
During 2007, 2006, and 2005 realized gains on sales of investment
securities available for sale were $310,000, $45,000, and $20,000 respectively.
The increase in 2007 is the result of a higher level of investment securities
available for sale and realization of gains on sales due to market appreciation.
Other expense of $1,100,000 for 2006 is attributable to a payment in
October 2006 for the settlement of potential claims by two stockholders of the
Company as more fully described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2006. Other income of $400,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2006, is attributable to receipt of insurance proceeds received in
connection with the settlement of those claims. The net cost to the Company for
the settlement of the matter was approximately $700,000.
Other income of $1,273,000 in 2006 consists of $1,201,000 attributable to
an IRS interest refund, consented to by the IRS in December 2006, and received
by the Company in January 2007. The IRS refund resulted from the Company's
pursuit of interest refund claims for several prior tax years under a tax code
provision which allowed for the retroactive recovery of the interest
differential where a taxpayer had a tax underpayment (subject to higher interest
payment rates) for one tax year and a simultaneous tax overpayment (subject to
lower interest refund rates) for another tax year. The Company is continuing to
pursue similar claims from several other tax years, but at the current time the
Company can give no assurances as to the final amounts of any additional
interest refunds, if any, or when they might be received. The additional $72,000
of other income is attributable to settlement proceeds received from the
litigation with SDG, Inc. The Company remains a shareholder in SDG and AMDG, but
has no current carrying value for this investment, as the Company's original
cost basis was previously written off.
As noted above, during the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company
recorded various amounts of other non-recurring other income and other expense
from various sources and matters. The net aggregate amount of these
non-recurring items resulted in the recognition of other income of $573,000, for
the year ended December 31, 2006.
The income tax provisions of $50,000 for the year 2007 and $132,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2006, are attributable to a provision for a minimum tax
on capital to the state of Connecticut. The income tax provision for continuing
operations of $95,000 for the year ending December 31, 2005, is attributable to
a provision for a minimum tax on capital to the state of Connecticut. The
Company utilized net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards and alternative
minimum tax ("AMT") NOL carryforwards which were available to offset taxable
income generated from the sale of Two Soundview as discussed in Part II - Item 8
- Notes 9 and 13 to the Company's consolidated financial statements. Due to
limitations on the amount of NOL carryforwards that can be utilized against
taxable income, the income tax provision of $400,000 for discontinued operations
for the year ended December 31, 2005, is attributable to a provision for federal
alternative minimum tax of $150,000 and a provision of $250,000 for Connecticut
state taxes.
A reconciliation between income taxes computed at the statutory federal
rate and the provision for income taxes is included in Part II - Item 8 - Note 9
to the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Discontinued Operations
As further discussed in Part II - Item 8 - Note 13 to the Company's
consolidated financial statements, the Company sold Two Soundview in July 2005.
The sale price was $28,000,000 less normal real estate closing costs and
adjustments. A gain from the sale of $10,298,000 is reflected in the Company's
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Income from discontinued operations before gain on disposition was $749,000
for the year ended December 31, 2005, which reflects the results of operations
for Two Soundview for the period through July 15, 2005 (date of sale).
TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
(in thousands) Payment Due By Period
=============================================================
Less Than One to Three to More than
Total One Year Three Years Five Years Five Years
------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Operating leases............................... $ 41 $ 14 $ 27 $ - $ -
------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total obligations.............................. $ 41 $ 14 $ 27 $ - $ -
======= ========== ========== ========== ==========
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and
application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events
that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and the
accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with
absolute certainty. The determination of estimates requires the exercise of
judgment. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and any such
differences may be material to the financial statements. We believe that the
following accounting policies, which are important to our financial position and
results of operations, require a higher degree of judgment and complexity in
their application and represent the critical accounting policies used in the
preparation of our financial statements. If different assumptions or conditions
were to prevail, the results could be materially different from our reported
results. For a summary of all our accounting policies, including the accounting
policies discussed below, see Part II - Item 8 - Note 2 to the Company's
consolidated financial statements.
Legal Proceedings: From time to time the Company and its subsidiaries may
be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings. The Company
presently is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation which could have
a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements presented
herein. Management of the Company in consultation with outside legal counsel
continually reviews the likelihood of liability and associated costs of pending
and threatened litigation including the basis for the calculation of any
litigation reserves which may be necessary. The assessment of such reserves
includes an exercise of judgment and is a matter of opinion. The Company intends
to aggressively contest all threatened litigation and contingencies, as well as
pursue all sources for contributions to settlements. For a discussion of
lawsuits and proceedings, see Part II - Item 8 - Note 10.
Income Tax Audits: The Company's federal, state and local tax returns, from
time to time, may be audited by the tax authorities, which could result in
proposed assessments or a change in the net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards
currently available. The Company's federal income tax returns for the years
subsequent to 1992 have not been reviewed by the Internal Revenue Service. The
accrued amounts for income taxes reflects management's best judgment as to the
amounts payable for all open tax years.
Deferred Tax Assets: As of December 31, 2007, the Company had deferred tax
assets arising primarily from net operating loss carryforwards and alternative
minimum tax credits available to offset taxable income in future periods. A
valuation allowance has been established for the entire net deferred tax asset
of $32 million, as management, at the current time, has no basis to conclude
that realization is more likely than not. The valuation allowance was calculated
in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income
Taxes" ("SFAS 109"), which places primary importance on a company's cumulative
operating results for the current and preceding years. We intend to maintain a
valuation allowance for the entire deferred tax asset until sufficient positive
evidence exists to support a reversal. See Part II - Item 8 - Note 9.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, - an interpretation of FASB Statement 109," ("FIN 48"). FIN 48
applies to all "tax positions" accounted for under FASB Statement No. 109. FIN
48 refers to "tax positions" as positions taken in a previously filed tax return
or positions expected to be taken in a future tax return that are reflected in
measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities reported in the
financial statements. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by
prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet
before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The adoption of FIN 48
had no effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS157"). SFAS No. 157, which is
effective for the Company in 2008, defines fair values, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting SFAS No.
157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115" ("SFAS159"). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to measure
eligible financial assets, financial liabilities and certain other assets and
liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The fair value
measurement election is irrevocable once made and subsequent changes in fair
value must be recorded in earnings. The effect of adoption will be reported as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. The Company will
adopt SFAS No. 159 in 2008 and is currently evaluating if it will elect the fair
value option for any of its eligible financial instruments and other items.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 158, "Employer's Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans, an Amendment of SFAS No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R" ("SFAS
158"). SFAS 158 requires an employer to (i) recognize in its statement of
financial position an asset for a plan's over funded status or a liability for a
plan's under funded status; (ii) measure a plan's assets and its obligations
that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer's fiscal year
(with limited exceptions); and (iii) recognize changes in the funded status of a
defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur.
Those changes will be reported in comprehensive income of a business entity. As
required, the Company adopted SFAS 158 as of December 31, 2006. The requirement
to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and the disclosure requirements
are effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006,
for entities with publicly traded equity securities, and at the end of the
fiscal year ending after June 15, 2007, for all other entities. The requirement
to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer's
fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2008. In accordance with the Supplemental Plan
Amendment, as previously adopted, the liability for the Supplemental Plan was
fully satisfied on May 31, 2007, by the lump-sum benefit payment of $16,676,115
(to Mr. Bianco, the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer),
and immediately thereafter, the Supplemental Plan automatically terminated. The
lump-sum Supplemental Plan benefit payment to Mr. Bianco was paid from the
Company's available financial resources. After May 31, 2007, no further
Supplemental Plan expense was required to be recognized by the Company.
Accordingly, because of the termination of the Supplemental Plan the adoption of
SFAS 158 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial
statements. See Note 7 herein for further information.
Cautionary Statement for Forward-Looking Information
This Annual Report together with other statements and information publicly
disseminated by the Company may contain certain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company
intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject
to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted or quantified. The
forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial
performance, future revenues or earning, business prospects, projected ventures,
anticipated market performance, anticipated litigation results or the timing of
pending litigation, and similar matters. When used in this Annual Report, the
words "estimates," "expects," "anticipates," "believes," "plans," "intends" and
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These risks and
uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company's control, include, but are
not limited to those set forth in "Item 1A, Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this
Annual Report and in the Company's other public filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission including, but not limited to: (i) transaction volume in the
securities markets, (ii) the volatility of the securities markets, (iii)
fluctuations in interest rates, (iv) risks inherent in the real estate business,
including, but not limited to, tenant defaults, changes in occupancy rates or
real estate values, (v) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect
the cost of doing business, (vi) general economic conditions, (vii) changes in
the rate of inflation and the related impact on the securities markets, (viii)
changes in federal and state tax laws, and (ix) risks arising from unfavorable
decisions in the Company's current material litigation matters, or unfavorable
decisions in other supervisory goodwill cases.
Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements,
which are applicable only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no
obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances that arise after the date of this Annual Report or to
reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Accordingly, there is no
assurance that the Company's expectations will be realized.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company holds short-term investments as a source of liquidity. The
Company's interest rate sensitive investments at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
with maturity dates of less than one year consist of the following:
2007 2006
(in thousands) ===================== =================
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Value Value Value Value
----------- ------ --------- -------
U.S. Treasury Bills and Notes........................ $16,313 $16,329 $34,623 $34,625
======= ======= ======= =======
Weighted average interest rate....................... 4.77% 4.65%
======= =======
The Company's current policy is to minimize the interest rate risk of its
short-term investments by investing in U.S. Treasury Bills with maturities of
less than one year. There were no significant changes in market exposures or the
manner in which interest rate risk is managed during the year.
The Company's portfolio of equity securities has exposure to equity price
risk. Equity price risk is defined as the potential loss in fair value resulting
from an adverse change in prices. The equity securities are primarily in the
form of preferred stock in utility companies. The equity securities are held for
an indefinite period, are accounted for as available for sale securities and are
carried at fair value with net unrealized gains and losses recorded directly in
a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss).
The table below summarizes the Company's equity price risk and shows the
effect of a hypothetical 20% increase and a 20% decrease in market price as of
the dates indicated below. The selected hypothetical changes are for
illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the best or
worse case scenarios.
(in thousands)
12/31/2007 12/31/2006
Equity Securities Available for Sale: ========== ==========
Fair value........................................................... $ - $ 1,417
========== ==========
Hypothetical fair value at a 20% increase in market price............ $ - $ 1,700
========== ==========
Hypothetical fair value at a 20% decrease in market price............ $ - $ 1,134
========== ==========
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF UHY LLP
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
AmBase Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of AmBase
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity,
comprehensive (loss) income, and cash flows for the year then ended. Our audit
also included the financial statement schedule for 2007. The Company's
management is responsible for these financial statements and schedule. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AmBase
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We were not engaged to examine management's assertion about the
effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007 included under Item 9A(T) under the caption "Management's
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting" and accordingly we
do not express an opinion thereon.
/s/ UHY LLP
New Haven, CT
March 27, 2008
REPORT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
AmBase Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet listed in the
index appearing under Item 15(a) (1) and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
AmBase Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period
ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, NY
March 27, 2007
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31
(in thousands, except per share data) 2007 2006 2005
==== ==== ====
Revenues:
Rental income................................................. $ - $ 92 $ 170
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits..................................... 2,911 4,778 4,212
Professional and outside services............................. 2,195 2,655 2,003
Property operating and maintenance............................ 122 123 124
Depreciation.................................................. 51 51 51
Insurance..................................................... 79 80 79
Other operating............................................... 143 200 179
----------- ----------- -------
5,501 7,887 6,648
----------- ----------- -------
Operating loss................................................ (5,501) (7,795) (6,478)
----------- ----------- -------
Interest income............................................... 1,305 1,846 1,034
Other expense, claims settlement.............................. - (1,100) -
Other income, insurance recovery.............................. - 400 -
Realized gains on sales of investment securities, net......... 310 45 20
Other income.................................................. - 1,273 -
----------- ----------- -------
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes........... (3,886) (5,331) (5,424)
Income tax expense on continuing operations................... (50) (132) (95)
----------- ----------- -------
Loss from continuing operations............................... (3,936) (5,463) (5,519)
----------- ----------- -------
Income from discontinued operations........................... - - 749
Gain on disposition........................................... - - 10,298
Income tax expense on discontinued operations................. - - (400)
----------- ----------- -------
Income from discontinued operations........................... - - 10,647
----------- ----------- -------
Net income (loss)............................................. $ (3,936) $ (5,463) $ 5,128
=========== =========== =======
Per share data:
Basic:
Loss from continuing operations............................... $ (0.09) $ (0.12) $ (0.12)
Income from discontinued operations........................... - - 0.23
----------- ----------- -------
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders......... $ (0.09) $ (0.12) $ 0.11
=========== =========== =======
Assuming dilution:
Loss from continuing operations............................... $ (0.09) $ (0.12) $ (0.12)
Income from discontinued operations........................... - - 0.23
----------- ----------- -------
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders......... (0.09) (0.12) 0.11
=========== =========== =======
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic......................................................... 44,691 45,327 46,234
=========== =========== =======
Assuming dilution............................................. 44,691 45,327 46,234
=========== =========== =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts) 2007 2006
==== ====
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents....................................................... $ 2,894 $ 2,601
Investment securities:
Held to maturity (market value $16,329 and $34,625, respectively)........... 16,313 34,623
Available for sale, carried at fair value................................... - 1,417
----------- ----------
Total investment securities..................................................... 16,313 36,040
----------- ----------
Real estate owned:
Land........................................................................ 554 554
Buildings................................................................... 1,900 1,900
----------- ----------
2,454 2,454
Accumulated depreciation ................................................... (334) (283)
----------- ----------
Real estate owned, net.......................................................... 2,120 2,171
----------- ----------
Other assets.................................................................... 232 1,336
----------- ----------
Total assets.................................................................... $ 21,559 $ 42,148
=========== ==========
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities........................................ $ 962 $ 1,171
Supplemental retirement plan.................................................... - 16,282
Other liabilities............................................................... 19 28
----------- ----------
Total liabilities............................................................... 981 17,481
----------- ----------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10).........................................
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 200,000,000 authorized, 46,410,007 issued
and 43,858,664 outstanding in 2007 and 44,968,519 outstanding in 2006)....... 464 464
Additional paid-in capital...................................................... 548,044 548,044
Accumulated other comprehensive loss............................................ - (336)
Accumulated deficit............................................................. (526,057) (522,121)
Treasury stock, at cost - 2,551,343 and 1,441,488 shares, respectively.......... (1,873) (1,384)
----------- ----------
Total stockholders' equity...................................................... 20,578 24,667
----------- ----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity...................................... $ 21,559 $ 42,148
=========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
Additional Accumulated other
(in thousands) Common paid-in comprehensive Accumulated Treasury
stock capital income (loss) deficit stock Total
====== ========== ================== =========== ======== =====
December 31, 2004............ $ 464 $ 547,956 $ (375) $ (521,786) $ (685) $25,574
Net income................... - - - 5,128 - 5,128
Other comprehensiveloss...... - - (1,020) - - (1,020)
------- ---------- --------------- ----------- -------- -------
December 31, 2005............ 464 547,956 (1,395) (516,658) (685) 29,682
------- ---------- --------------- ----------- -------- -------
Net loss..................... - - - (5,463) - (5,463)
Stock-based compensation..... - 88 - - - 88
Common stock repurchased.... - - - - (699) (699)
Other comprehensive income... - - 1,059 - - 1,059
------- ---------- --------------- ------------ --------- -------
December 31, 2006............ 464 548,044 (336) (522,121) (1,384) 24,667
------- ---------- --------------- ------------ --------- -------
Net loss..................... - - - (3,936) - (3,936)
Common stock repurchased..... - - - - (489) (489)
Other comprehensive income... - - 336 - - 336
------- ---------- --------------- ------------ --------- -------
December 31, 2007............ $ 464 $ 548,044 $ - $ (526,057) $ (1,873) $20,578
======= ========== =============== ============ ========= =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years Ended December 31
(in thousands)
2007 2006 2005
====== ====== ======
Net income (loss).......................................................... $ (3,936) $ (5,463) $ 5,128
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax effect of $0.............. 474 852 (914)
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment securities - available for sale,
net of tax effect of $0............................................. (138) 207 (106)
--------- --------- ---------
Comprehensive income (loss)................................................ $ (3,600) $ (4,404) $ 4,108
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31
(in thousands) 2007 2006 2005
==== ==== ====
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)........................................................ $ (3,936) $ (5,463) $ 5,128
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used
by operations:
Accretion of discount - investment securities............................ (34) (53) (575)
Depreciation and amortization............................................ 51 51 51
Realized gains on sales of investment securities available for sale...... (310) (45) (20)
Stock-based compensation expense......................................... - 88 -
Amortization of minimum pension liability................................ 474 852 -
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable.......................................... 125 (33) -
Accounts receivable.................................................. - - 1
Other assets......................................................... 1,014 (1,197) 426
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities............................. (209) (397) 73
Payment of Supplemental Plan lump-sum benefit........................ (16,676) - -
Supplemental Plan and other liabilities.............................. 387 1,677 233
Discontinued operations:
Gain from sale of discontinued operations........................... - - (10,298)
Depreciation and amortization related to discontinued operations.... - - 140
Changes in other assets and liabilities of discontinued operations.. - - (305)
Other, net............................................................... (2) 1 2
-------- --------- --------
Net cash used by operating activities................................... (19,116) (4,519) (5,144)
-------- --------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Maturities of investment securities - held to maturity................... 59,164 106,561 81,627
Purchases of investment securities - held to maturity.................... (40,855) (102,158) (111,493)
Purchases of investment securities - available for sale.................. (31) - (252)
Sales of investment securities - available for sale...................... 1,620 564 548
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned.................................. - - 27,442
-------- --------- --------
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities......................... 19,898 4,967 (2,128)
-------- --------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Common stock repurchased................................................. (489) (699) -
-------- --------- --------
Net cash used by financing activities.................................... (489) (699) -
-------- --------- --------
Net change in cash and cash equivalents.................................. 293 (251) (7,272)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year........................... 2,601 2,852 10,124
-------- --------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year................................. $ 2,894 $ 2,601 $ 2,852
======== ========= ========
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:
Income taxes paid........................................................ $ 83 $ 492 $ 100
======== ========= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Organization
AmBase Corporation (the "Company") is a holding company which, through a
wholly owned subsidiary, owns a commercial office building in Greenwich,
Connecticut and a 6.3% ownership interest in SDG, Inc. ("SDG"), a development
stage pharmaceutical company. The Company previously owned an insurance company
and a savings bank.
In February 1991, the Company sold its ownership interest in The Home
Insurance Company and its subsidiaries. On December 4, 1992, Carteret Savings
Bank, FA ("Carteret") was placed in receivership by the Office of Thrift
Supervision ("OTS").
The Company currently earns non-operating revenue consisting principally of
investment earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents. The Company
continues to evaluate a number of possible acquisitions, and is engaged in the
management of its assets and liabilities, including the contingent assets
associated with its legal claims, as described in Notes 9 and 10. The Company's
main source of operating revenue in 2006 and 2005 was rental income earned on
real estate owned.
In July 2005, the Company completed the sale of its 38,000 square foot
office building at Two Soundview Drive in Greenwich, Connecticut ("Two
Soundview"). Accordingly, the results of operations of Two Soundview have been
retroactively reclassified as discontinued operations in the accompanying
Consolidated Statement of Operations in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS 144").
See Note 13 for additional information.
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
("GAAP").
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the GAAP requires management to make estimates
and assumptions, that it deems reasonable, that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such
estimates and assumptions.
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of the
Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Cash and cash equivalents
Highly liquid investments, consisting principally of funds held in
short-term money market accounts, with original maturities of less than three
months, are classified as cash equivalents.
Investment securities
Securities that the Company has both the positive intent and ability to
hold to maturity are classified as investment securities - held to maturity and
are carried at amortized cost. Investment securities - available for sale, were
those securities that could be sold prior to maturity, were carried at fair
value, with any net unrealized gains or losses reported in a separate component
of other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes.
Interest and dividends on investment securities are recognized when earned.
Realized gains and losses on the sale of investment securities - available for
sale are calculated using an average cost basis for determining the cost basis
of the securities. The fair value of publicly traded investment securities is
determined by reference to current market quotations.
The Company continually reviews its investments to determine whether a
decline in fair value below the cost basis is other than temporary. If the
decline in fair value is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of
the security is written down to fair market value and the amount of the write
down is included in the operations.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Income taxes
The Company and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated federal
income tax return. The Company recognizes both the current and deferred tax
consequences of all transactions that have been recognized in the financial
statements, calculated based on the provisions of enacted tax laws, including
the tax rates in effect for current and future years. Net deferred tax assets
are recognized immediately when a more likely than not criterion is met; that
is, a greater than 50% probability exists that the tax benefits will actually be
realized sometime in the future. At the present time, management has no basis to
conclude that realization is more likely than not and a valuation reserve has
been recorded against net deferred tax assets.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share ("EPS") excludes dilution and is computed by
dividing income (loss) from continuing operations by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential
dilution of EPS that could occur if options to issue common stock were
exercised.
Stock-based compensation
Under the Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1993 Plan"), the
Company may grant to officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries,
stock options ("Options"), stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), restricted stock
awards ("Restricted Stock"), merit awards ("Merit Awards") and performance share
awards ("Performance Shares"), through May 28, 2008. An aggregate of 5,000,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock are reserved for issuance under the 1993
Plan (upon the exercise of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, upon awards of
Restricted Stock and Performance Shares); however, of such shares, only
2,500,000 shares in the aggregate shall be available for issuance for Restricted
Stock Awards and Merit Awards. Such shares shall be authorized but unissued
shares of Common Stock. Options may be granted as incentive stock options
("ISOs") intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Federal tax law
or as nonqualified stock options ("NQSOs"). SARs may be granted with respect to
any Options granted under the 1993 Plan and may be exercised only when the
underlying Option is exercisable. The 1993 Plan requires that the exercise price
of all Options and SARs be equal to or greater than the fair market value of the
Company's Common Stock on the date of grant of that Option. The term of any ISO
or related SAR cannot exceed ten years from the date of grant, and the term of
any NQSO cannot exceed ten years and one month from the date of grant. Subject
to the terms of the 1993 Plan and any additional restrictions imposed at the
time of grant, Options and any related SARs ordinarily will become exercisable
commencing one year after the date of grant. In the case of a "Change of
Control" of the Company (as defined in the 1993 Plan), Options granted pursuant
to the 1993 Plan may become fully exercisable as to all optioned shares from and
after the date of such Change in Control in the discretion of the Committee or
as may otherwise be provided in the grantee's Option agreement. Death,
retirement, or absence for disability will not result in the cancellation of any
Options.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised
2004), "Share-Based Payment," ("SFAS 123R"), using the modified prospective
approach and therefore has not restated results for prior periods. Under this
method, stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2007
and December 31, 2006, includes compensation expense for all stock-based
compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006,
based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS123"). Stock-based compensation expense for
all stock-based compensation awards granted after January 1, 2006, for which
vesting is based solely on employment service, will be based on the grant date
fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. The Company
recognizes these compensation costs for only those shares expected to vest, on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is
generally the option vesting term of two years. See Note 8 herein for a further
discussion of stock-based compensation.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
No stock based compensation expense was recorded in 2007, as all previously
granted outstanding options vested as of January 2, 2007. No stock option awards
have been granted since January 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2006,
the Company recorded compensation expense of $88,000 relating to unvested stock
options. Compensation expense relating to stock options is recorded in the
consolidated statement of operations, with a corresponding increase to
additional paid in capital in the statement of stockholders' equity. Prior to
2006, as permitted by SFAS 123, the Company accounted for share-based payments
to employees using APB 25's intrinsic value method and recognized no
compensation cost for employee stock options in prior years. Had the Company
adopted SFAS 123R in the prior period, the impact of that standard would have
approximated the impact of SFAS 123 in the disclosure of pro-forma net income
and earnings per share described as follows:
(in thousands, except per share data)
2005
Net income =========
As reported....................................................................... $ 5,128
Deduct: pro forma stock based compensation expense for
stock options pursuant to Statement 123....................................... (126)
----------
Pro forma......................................................................... $ 5,002
==========
Net income per common share
Basic - as reported............................................................... $ 0.11
Basic - pro forma................................................................. 0.11
Assuming dilution - as reported................................................... 0.11
Assuming dilution - pro forma .................................................... 0.11
==========
Deferred rent receivable and revenue recognition
The Company previously earned rental income under operating leases with
tenants. Minimum lease rentals were recognized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the leases. The cumulative difference between lease revenue recognized
the straight-line method and the contractual lease payment terms, if any, was
recorded as deferred rent receivable or payable and was included in other assets
or other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, as applicable. Revenue
from tenant reimbursement of common area maintenance, utilities and other
operating expenses were recognized pursuant to the tenant's lease when earned
and due from tenants.
Property operating and maintenance
Property operating and maintenance expenses for common area maintenance,
utilities, real estate taxes and other reimbursable operating expenses, were not
reduced by amounts reimbursed by tenants pursuant to lease agreements.
Depreciation
Depreciation expense for buildings is calculated on a straight-line basis
over 39 years. Tenant improvements if any, would be typically depreciated over
the lesser of the remaining life of the tenants' lease or the estimated useful
lives of the improvements.
Liquidity
The Company's management currently anticipates that operating cash needs
for the next twelve months will be met principally by the receipt of investment
earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents, and the Company's
current financial resources.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
New Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement 109," ("FIN 48"). FIN 48
applies to all "tax positions" accounted for under FASB Statement No. 109. FIN
48 refers to "tax positions" as positions taken in a previously filed tax return
or positions expected to be taken in a future tax return that are reflected in
measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities reported in the
financial statements. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by
prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet
before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The adoption of FIN 48
had no effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS157"). SFAS No. 157 defines fair
values, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Company in
2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting SFAS
No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115" ("SFAS159"). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to measure
eligible financial assets, financial liabilities and certain other assets and
liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The fair value
measurement election is irrevocable once made and subsequent changes in fair
value must be recorded in earnings. The effect of adoption will be reported as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. The Company will
adopt SFAS No. 159 in 2008 and is currently evaluating if it will elect the fair
value option for any of its eligible financial instruments and other items.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 158, "Employer's Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans, an Amendment of SFAS No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R" ("SFAS
158"). SFAS 158 requires an employer to (i) recognize in its statement of
financial position an asset for a plan's over funded status or a liability for a
plan's under funded status; (ii) measure a plan's assets and its obligations
that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer's fiscal year
(with limited exceptions); and (iii) recognize changes in the funded status of a
defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur.
Those changes will be reported in comprehensive income of a business entity. The
requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and the disclosure
requirements are effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after
December 15, 2006, for entities with publicly traded equity securities, and at
the end of the fiscal year ending after June 15, 2007, for all other entities.
As required the Company adapted SFAS 158 as of December 31, 2006. The
requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the
employer's fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. In accordance with the Supplemental
Plan Amendment, as previously adopted, the liability for the Supplemental Plan
was fully satisfied on May 31, 2007, by the lump-sum benefit payment of
$16,676,115 (to Mr. Bianco, the Company's Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer), and immediately thereafter, the Supplemental Plan
automatically terminated. The lump-sum Supplemental Plan benefit payment to Mr.
Bianco was paid from the Company's available financial resources. After May 31,
2007, no further Supplemental Plan expense was required to be recognized by the
Company. Accordingly, because of the termination of the Supplemental Plan the
adoption of SFAS 158 did not have a material effect on the Company's
consolidated financial statements. See Note 7 herein for further information.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 3 - Investment Securities
Investment securities - held to maturity consist of U.S. Treasury Bills and
a U.S. Treasury Note with original maturities of three months or more and are
carried at amortized cost based upon the Company's intent and ability to hold
these investments to maturity.
Investment securities - available for sale, at December 31, 2007, consisted
of investments in equity securities held for an indefinite period and were
carried at fair value with net unrealized gains and losses recorded directly in
a separate component of stockholders' equity.
Investment securities at December 31 consist of the following:
2007 2006
========================================= ===============================================
Cost or Cost or
Carrying Amortized Fair Carrying Amortized Fair
(in thousands) Value Cost Value Value Cost Value
====== ======== ===== ====== ======== =====
Held to Maturity:
U.S. Treasury Bills......$ 16,313 $ 16,313 $ 16,329 $ 18,187 $ 18,187 $ 18,196
U.S. Treasury Note....... - - - 16,436 16,436 16,429
-------- -------- -------- --------- --------- -----------
16,313 16,313 16,329 34,623 34,623 34,625
Available for Sale:
Equity Securities....... - - - 1,417 1,279 1,417
-------- -------- -------- --------- --------- -----------
$ 16,313 $ 16,313 $ 16,329 $ 36,040 $ 35,902 $ 36,042
========= ======== ======== ======== ========= ===========
The gross unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities at December
31, consist of the following:
(in thousands) 2007 2006
==== ====
Held to Maturity:
Gross unrealized gains.............................................................. $ 17 $ 9
======= =====
Gross unrealized losses............................................................ $ (1) $ (7)
======= =====
Available for Sale:
Gross unrealized gains.............................................................. $ - $ 138
======= =====
Gross unrealized losses............................................................. $ - $ -
======= =====
Realized gain on the sales of investment securities available for sale
follow:
(in thousands)
2007 2006 2005
======= ======= ======
Net sale proceeds.............................................. $ 1,620 $ 564 $ 548
Cost basis..................................................... (1,310) (519) (528)
------- ------- ------
Realized gain.................................................. $ 310 $ 45 $ 20
======= ======= ======
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 4 - Earnings Per Share
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share, including the
effect of dilutive securities, for the years ended December 31, is as follows:
(in thousands, except per share data) 2007 2006 2005
======= ======= ======
Loss from continuing operations............................... $(3,936) $ (5,463) $(5,519)
======= ======== =======
Weighted average common shares outstanding ................... 44,691 45,327 46,234
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Assumed stock option exercise................................. - - -
------- -------- -------
Weighted average common shares outstanding assuming dilution.. 44,691 45,327 46,234
======= ======== =======
Loss from continuing operations per common share:
Basic......................................................... $ (0.09) $ (0.12) $ (0.12)
Assuming dilution............................................. (0.09) (0.12) (0.12)
======= ======== =======
Options to purchase common stock of 876,000 shares in 2007, 1,240,000
shares in 2006 and 1,440,000 shares in 2005 were excluded from the computation
of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive in the computation
of earnings per share from continuing operations.
Note 5 - Stockholders' Equity
Authorized capital stock consists of 50,000,000 shares of cumulative
preferred stock, $0.01 par value, and 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.01
par value.
Changes in the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company are as
follows:
2007 2006 2005
========== ========== ==========
Balance at beginning of year................................. 44,968,519 46,233,519 46,233,519
Common shares repurchased.................................... (1,109,855) (1,265,000) -
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at end of year....................................... 43,858,664 44,968,519 46,233,519
========== ========== ==========
Common stock balances exclude treasury shares as of December 31, as
follows:
2007 2006 2005
========== ========== ========
Treasury shares.............................................. 2,551,343 1,441,488 176,488
========== ========== ========
Aggregate dollar value of treasury shares.................... $1,873,000 $1,384,000 $685,000
========== ========== ========
Average cost per treasury share.............................. $0.73 $0.96 $3.88
========== ========== ========
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
At December 31, 2007, there were 5,110,000 common shares reserved for
issuance under the Company's stock option and other employee benefit plans.
Stockholder Rights Plan
On January 29, 1986, the Company's Board of Directors declared a dividend
distribution of one right for each outstanding share of Common Stock of the
Company. The rights, as amended, which entitle the holder to purchase from the
Company a common share at a price of $75.00, are not exercisable until either a
person or group of affiliated persons acquires 25% or more of the Company's
outstanding common shares or upon the commencement or disclosure of an intention
to commence a tender offer or exchange offer for 20% or more of the common
shares. The rights are redeemable by the Company at $0.05 per right at any time
until the earlier of the tenth day following an accumulation of 20% or more of
the Company's shares by a single acquirer or group, or the occurrence of certain
Triggering Events (as defined in the Stockholder Rights Plan). In the event the
rights become exercisable and thereafter, the Company is acquired in a merger or
other business combination, or in certain other circumstances, each right will
entitle the holder to purchase from the surviving corporation, for the exercise
price, Common Stock having a market value of twice the exercise price of the
right. The rights are subject to adjustment to prevent dilution and expire on
February 10, 2011.
Common Stock Repurchase Plan
In January 2002, the Company announced a common stock repurchase plan (the
"Repurchase Plan") which allows for the repurchase by the Company for up to 10
million shares of its common stock in the open market.
The Repurchase Plan is conditioned upon favorable business conditions and
acceptable prices for the common stock. Purchases under the Repurchase Plan may
be made, from time to time, in the open market, through block trades or
otherwise. Depending on market conditions and other factors, purchases may be
commenced or suspended any time or from time to time without prior notice.
During the year 2007, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 1,109,855
shares of common stock from unaffiliated parties, at various dates, at market
prices at their time of purchase for an aggregate cost, including broker
commissions of $489,000, pursuant to the Repurchase Plan.
During January, 2008, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 189,100
shares of common stock from unaffiliated parties at a purchase price, including
broker commissions, of $0.43 per share pursuant to the Company's Repurchase
Plan.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 6 - Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Components of other accumulated comprehensive income (loss), for the year
ended December 31 follow:
(in thousands) 2007 2006
========================================== =========================================
Minimum Unrealized Accumulated Minimum Unrealized Accumulated
Pension Gains (Losses) Other Pension Gains (Losses) Other
Liability on Investment Comprehensive Liability on Investment Comprehensive
Adjustment Securities Income (Loss) Adjustment Securities Income (Loss)
========== ============= ============= ========== ============= =============
Balance beginning of period...$ (474) $ 138 $ (336) $ (1,326) $ (69) $ (1,395)
Reclassification adjustment for
gains realized in net loss.. - (211) (211) - 32 32
Change during the period...... 474 73 547 852 175 1,027
-------- ------------ ------------ --------- ----------- ------------
Balance end of period......... $ - $ - $ - $ (474) $ 138 $ (336)
======== =========== ============ ========= =========== ============
(in thousands) 2005
==========================================
Minimum Unrealized Accumulated
Pension Gains on Other
Liability Investment Comprehensive
Adjustment Securities Income (Loss)
========== ========== =============
Balance beginning of period....$ (412) $ 37 $ (375)
Reclassification adjustment for
gains realized in net loss... - (5) (5)
Change during the period.......$ (914) (101) (1,015)
---------- ---------- -------------
Balance end of period..........$ (1,326) $ (69) $ (1,395)
========== ========== =============
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 7 - Pension and Savings Plans
The Company previously sponsored a non tax-qualified supplemental
retirement plan, initially adopted by the Company in 1985, and as amended and
restated (the "Supplemental Plan"), under which only one current executive
officer of the Company was the sole participant. The cost of the Supplemental
Plan was accrued but not funded.
In accordance with an amendment to the Supplemental Plan, as previously
adopted in March 2006, the liability for the Supplemental Plan was fully
satisfied on May 31, 2007, by the lump-sum benefit payment of $16,676,115 (to
Mr. Bianco, the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer), and
immediately thereafter, the Supplemental Plan automatically terminated. The
lump-sum Supplemental Plan benefit payment to Mr. Bianco was paid from the
Company's available financial resources. After May 31, 2007, no further
Supplemental Plan expense was required to be recognized by the Company. The
Supplemental Plan liability was $16,282,000 at December 31, 2006.
The Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the
"Personnel Committee") had reviewed the Supplemental Plan and the Company's
related liability, including the desirability of continuing to maintain and
administer the Supplemental Plan, the untying of Mr. Bianco's employment with
the Company from the timing of his Supplemental Plan benefit payment(s), the
Company's overall financial position, and the desirability of continued accruals
under the Supplemental Plan after Mr. Bianco's prior employment contract
expiration on May 31, 2007. In connection with this review, the Personnel
Committee considered various options, including whether or not to terminate
and/or curtail the Supplemental Plan. Mr. Bianco (the Company's Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and the former President and Chief
Executive Officer of Carteret Savings Bank, FA), was the only current employee
of the Company who participated in the Supplemental Plan and his Supplemental
Plan benefit was fully vested. For purposes of computing his accrued benefit
under the Supplemental Plan, Mr. Bianco had 14.67 years of credited services as
of December 31, 2005 and 16.08 years of credited service as of May 31, 2007. His
accrual percentage under the Supplemental Plan was 4%, in effect from the time
of his initial employment with the Company, and in accordance with the
Supplemental Plan (prior to the amendment described below), he had the
entitlement to receive his Supplemental Plan benefit in either a lump-sum or an
annuity upon termination of his employment with the Company.
During March 2006, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with
Mr. Bianco to extend his employment with the Company for an additional five (5)
years beyond May 31, 2007, until May 31, 2012 (the "2007 Employment Agreement").
As part of the 2007 Employment Agreement terms: (i) Mr. Bianco's annual rate of
base salary will not increase from his current rate of base salary during the
first three years of the 2007 Employment Agreement (the amount of Mr. Bianco's
base salary for the fourth and fifth years of the 2007 Employment Agreement term
to be determined by the Personnel Committee, in its sole discretion, although in
no event less than $625,000 per annum); (ii) Mr. Bianco's service accruals under
the Supplemental Plan will cease as of May 31, 2007; (iii) Mr. Bianco's Final
Average Earnings (as defined in the Supplemental Plan) for Supplemental Plan
benefit calculation purposes, was capped as of December 31, 2004; and (iv) Mr.
Bianco's annual bonus opportunity will no longer be linked to recovery efforts
in connection with the Company's Supervisory Goodwill litigation. Instead, on
May 31, 2007, Mr. Bianco received a lump-sum payment of his Supplemental Plan
benefit of $16,676,115, which amount was calculated on the basis of a 5.75%
discount rate, a "RP-2000" projected to 2004 mortality table, and 16.08 years of
credited service, and the Company and Mr. Bianco agreed to a long term incentive
bonus formula, at varying percentages ranging from 5% to 10%, or more, based
upon recoveries received by the Company for its investment in Carteret Savings
Bank, through litigation or otherwise (including the Company's Supervisory
Goodwill litigation).
Based on the 2007 Employment Agreement and the amendment of the
Supplemental Plan as previously adopted in March 2006, each as described above,
the Company revised the calculation of the Supplemental Plan liability to
reflect a 5.75% discount rate as of April 1, 2006, as set forth in the
agreements. The Supplemental Plan liability was increased by an expense of
$394,000 in the full year period ended December 31, 2007, to reflect the May 31,
2007 lump-sum payment amount of $16,676,115, utilizing the 5.75% discount rate
factor.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
An additional Supplemental Plan expense of $474,000 was recorded in the
full year period ended December 31, 2007, to fully amortize the Supplemental
Plan minimum pension liability adjustment. The minimum pension liability
adjustment, which was included as a component of stockholders' equity within
accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Company's consolidated financial
statements, was $1,326,000 as of March 31, 2006, and was amortized on a straight
line basis over the 14-month period ending May 31, 2007 as an additional
Supplemental Plan expense of $284,000 per quarter. This resulted in an aggregate
Supplemental Plan expense of $474,000 for the full year period ended December
31, 2007. The amortization of the additional minimum pension liability in the
2007 and 2006 periods, although recorded as a component of compensation expense
in the Company's consolidated statement of operations, did not result in a
decrease in total stockholders' equity, as its recognition resulted in an
increase in one component and a corresponding decrease in another component of
stockholders' equity. See Part I - Item 1 - Note 8, herein for further
information.
In connection with the Supplemental Plan lump-sum benefit payment, the
Company paid approximately $242,000 of employer Medicare taxes, which are
included as a component of compensation and benefits expense in the Company's
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the full year period ended December 31,
2007.
Pension expense for the Supplemental Plan for the years ended December 31
was as follows:
(in thousands) 2007 2006 2005
======== ======== ========
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation................. $ 394 $ 1,224 $ 769
Amortization of minimum pension liability..................... 474 852 -
Service cost of current period................................ - 463 1,031
Amortization of unrecognized losses........................... - - 287
-------- -------- --------
$ 868 $ 2,539 $ 2,087
======== ======== ========
A reconciliation of the changes in the projected benefit obligation from
the beginning of the year to the end of the year for 2007 and 2006 is as
follows:
(in thousands) 2007 2006
======== ========
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year................................... $16,282 $ 14,595
Service cost........................................................................ - 463
Interest cost....................................................................... 394 1,224
Lump-sum benefit payment............................................................ (16,676) -
------- --------
Projected benefit obligation at end of year......................................... $ - $ 16,282
======= ========
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Accrued pension costs for the Supplemental Plan at December 31, 2006 and
some of the assumptions used to determine these amounts, are summarized below:
(dollars in thousands) 2006
========
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations:
Accumulated benefit obligations, fully vested................................................ $ 16,282
========
Projected benefit obligation for service rendered to date.................................... $ 16,282
Unrecognized net loss........................................................................ (474)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss......................................................... 474
--------
Accrued pension costs........................................................................ $ 16,282
========
Major assumptions:
Discount rate................................................................................ 5.75%
Rate of increase in future compensation...................................................... -
========
The Company sponsors the AmBase 401(k) Savings Plan (the "Savings Plan"),
which is a "Section 401(k) Plan" within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). The Savings Plan permits eligible employees to
make contributions of up to 15% of compensation, which are matched by the
Company at a percentage determined annually. The employer match is currently
100% of the amount the employee elects to defer. Employee contributions to the
Savings Plan are invested at the employee's discretion, in various investment
funds. The Company's matching contributions are invested in the same manner as
the compensation reduction contributions. The Company's matching contributions
to the Savings Plan, charged to expense, were $60,000, $55,000 and $50,000 in
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. All contributions are subject to maximum
limitations contained in the Code.
Note 8- Incentive Plans
Under the Company's 1994 Senior Management Incentive Compensation Plan (the
"1994 Plan"), any executive officer of the Company whose compensation is
required to be reported to stockholders under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Participants") and who is serving as such at any time during the
fiscal year as to which an award is granted, may receive an award of a cash
bonus ("Bonus"), in an amount determined by the Personnel Committee of the
Company's Board of Directors (the "Committee") and payable from an annual bonus
fund (the "Annual Bonus Pool"). The Committee may award Bonuses under the 1994
Plan to Participants not later than 120 days after the end of each fiscal year
(the "Reference Year").
If the Committee grants a Bonus under the 1994 Plan, the amount of the
Annual Bonus Pool will be an amount equal to the sum of (i) plus (ii), where:
(i) is ten percent (10%) of the amount by which the Company's Total
Stockholders' Equity, as defined, on the last day of a Reference Year increased
over the Company's Total Stockholders' Equity, as defined, on the last day of
the immediately preceding Reference Year; and
(ii) is five percent (5%) of the amount by which the Company's market
value, as defined, on the last day of the Reference Year increased over the
Company's market value on the last day of the immediately preceding Reference
Year.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the 1994 Plan provides that in the event of
a decrease in either or both of items (i) and/or (ii) above, the Annual Bonus
Pool is determined by reference to the last Reference Year in which there was an
increase in such item. If the Committee determines within the 120-day time
period to award a Bonus, the share of the Annual Bonus Pool to be allocated to
each Participant shall be as follows: 45% of the Annual Bonus Pool shall be
allocated to the Company's Chief Executive Officer, and 55% of the Annual Bonus
Pool shall be allocated pro rata to each of the Company's Participants as
determined by the Committee. The Committee in its discretion may reduce the
percentage of the Annual Bonus Pool to any Participant for any Reference Year,
and such reduction shall not increase the share of any other Participant. The
1994 Plan is not the exclusive plan under which the Executive Officers may
receive cash or other incentive compensation or bonuses. No Bonuses were paid
attributable to the 1994 Plan for 2007, 2006, or 2005.
Under the Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1993 Plan"), the
Company may grant to officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries,
stock options ("Options"), stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), restricted stock
awards ("Restricted Stock"), merit awards ("Merit Awards") and performance share
awards ("Performance Shares") through May 28, 2008. The Board of Directors and
Personnel Committee have approved an amendment to the 1993 Plan to extend the
termination date, for the period during which awards may be granted under the
1993 Plan, for an additional 10 years to May 28, 2018 from May 28, 2008, subject
to the approval by a majority vote of the Company's stockholders at the
Company's Annual Meeting of stockholders scheduled for May 16, 2008. An
aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock are reserved for
issuance under the 1993 Plan (upon the exercise of Options and Stock
Appreciation Rights, upon awards of Restricted Stock and Performance Shares);
however, of such shares, only 2,500,000 shares in the aggregate shall be
available for issuance for Restricted Stock Awards and Merit Awards. Such shares
shall be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. Options may be granted
as incentive stock options ("ISOs") intended to qualify for favorable tax
treatment under Federal tax law or as nonqualified stock options ("NQSOs"). SARs
may be granted with respect to any Options granted under the 1993 Plan and may
be exercised only when the underlying Option is exercisable. The 1993 Plan
requires that the exercise price of all Options and SARs be equal to or greater
than the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on the date of grant of
that Option. The term of any ISO or related SAR cannot exceed ten years from the
date of grant, and the term of any NQSO cannot exceed ten years and one month
from the date of grant. Subject to the terms of the 1993 Plan and any additional
restrictions imposed at the time of grant, Options and any related SARs
ordinarily will become exercisable commencing one year after the date of grant.
In the case of a "Change of Control" of the Company (as defined in the 1993
Plan), Options granted pursuant to the 1993 Plan may become fully exercisable as
to all optioned shares from and after the date of such Change in Control in the
discretion of the Committee or as may otherwise be provided in the grantee's
Option agreement. Death, retirement, or absence for disability will not result
in the cancellation of any Options.
As a condition to any award of Restricted Stock or Merit Award under the
1993 Plan, the Committee may require a participant to pay an amount equal to, or
in excess of, the par value of the shares of Restricted Stock or Common Stock
awarded to him or her. Restricted Stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred,
pledged or otherwise encumbered during a "Restricted Period", which in the case
of grants to employees shall not be less than one year from the date of grant.
The Restricted Period with respect to any outstanding shares of Restricted Stock
awarded to employees may be reduced by the Committee at any time, but in no
event shall the Restricted Period be less than one year. Except for such
restrictions, the employee as the owner of such stock shall have all of the
rights of a stockholder including, but not limited to, the right to vote such
stock and to receive dividends thereon as and when paid. In the event that an
employee's employment is terminated for any reason, an employee's Restricted
Stock will be forfeited; provided, however, that the Committee may limit such
forfeiture in its sole discretion. At the end of the Restricted Period, all
shares of Restricted Stock shall be transferred free and clear of all
restrictions to the employee. In the case of a Change in Control of the Company
(as defined in the 1993 Plan), an employee may receive his or her Restricted
Stock free and clear of all restrictions in the discretion of the Committee, or
as may otherwise be provided pursuant to the employee's Restricted Stock award.
Performance Share awards of Common Stock under the 1993 Plan shall be
earned on the basis of the Company's performance in relation to established
performance measures for a specific performance period. Such measures may
include, but shall not be limited to, return on investment, earnings per share,
return on stockholder's equity, or return to stockholders. Performance Shares
may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered during
the relevant performance period. Performance Shares may be paid in cash, shares
of Common Stock or shares of Restricted Stock in such portions as the Committee
may determine. An employee must be employed at the end of the performance period
to receive payments of Performance Shares; provided, however, in the event that
an employee's employment is terminated by reason of death, disability,
retirement or other reason approved by the Committee, the Committee may limit
such forfeiture in its sole discretion. In the case of a Change in Control of
the Company (as defined in the 1993 Plan), an employee may receive his or her
Performance Shares in the discretion of the Committee, or as may otherwise be
provided in the employee's Performance Share award.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Incentive plan activity is summarized as follows:
1993 Stock
(shares in thousands) Incentive Plan
=========================================
Weighted
Shares Average
Under Exercise
Option Price
--------- -----------
Outstanding at December 31, 2004..................... 1,245 $ 1.00
Expired............................................. (45) 1.05
Granted............................................. 240 0.81
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 2005..................... 1,440 $ 0.96
Expired.............................................. (200) 0.66
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 2006..................... 1,240 1.01
Expired.............................................. (364) 1.19
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 2007..................... 876 0.93
=========
Options exercisable at:
December 31, 2007.................................... 876 $ 0.93
December 31, 2006.................................... 1,036 1.02
December 31, 2005.................................... 912 1.00
The following table summarizes information about the Company's stock
options outstanding and exercisable under the 1993 Plan at December 31, 2007, as
follows:
(shares in thousands)
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
========================================= ====================================
Weighted
Average
Remaining Weighted Weighted
Range of Contractual Average Average
Exercise Life Exercise Exercise
Prices Shares (in years) Price Shares Price
====== ===== ======== ======= ===== =======
$0.60 to $0.90 500 6 $0.72 500 $0.72
$0.95 15 2 0.95 15 0.95
$1.09 to $1.19 336 4 1.09 336 1.09
$2.56 to $3.65 25 1 3.00 25 3.00
-------- --------
Total 876 876 0.93
===== =====
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
At December 31, 2007, the weighted average remaining contractual life in
years for options outstanding and options exercisable was 4.40 and 4.34 years,
respectively. At December 31, 2007, the exercise price of stock options
outstanding and exercisable was greater than the market price of the Company's
stock; therefore, no intrinsic value for stock options is reflected herein.
No stock based compensation expense was recorded in 2007, as all previously
granted outstanding options vested as of January 2, 2007. No stock option awards
have been granted since January 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2006,
the Company recorded compensation expense of $88,000 relating to unvested stock
options. Compensation expense relating to stock options is recorded in the
consolidated statement of operations, with a corresponding increase to
additional paid in capital in the statement of stockholders' equity. Prior to
2006, as permitted by SFAS 123, the Company accounted for share-based payments
to employees using APB 25's intrinsic value method and recognized no
compensation cost for employee stock options in prior years. See Note 2 for
additional information, including disclosure of the pro-forma net income (loss)
and earnings per share had the Company adopted SFAS 123R in prior periods.
The fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model ("Black-Scholes") that
uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are
based on historical volatility of the Company's stock. The Company uses
historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within
the valuation model. The expected term of options granted is estimated based on
the contractual lives of option grants, option vesting period and historical
data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be
outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life
of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury bond yield in effect at the time of
grant. No adjustments were made in 2006 to the input assumptions for the
calculation of the fair value of stock options granted in 2005 from the pro
forma amounts previously presented in the Company's prior period financial
statements.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of highly
subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock-based award and
stock price volatility. The assumptions noted herein represent management's best
estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the
application of management judgment. As a result, if other assumptions had been
used, our recorded and pro forma stock-based compensation expense could have
been materially different from that depicted herein. In addition, the Company is
required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for
those shares expected to vest. If the actual forfeiture rate is materially
different from the previous estimate, the share-based compensation expense could
be materially different.
The Company believes that the use of the Black-Scholes model meets the fair
value measurement objectives of SFAS 123R and reflects all substantive
characteristics of the instruments being valued. No stock options were granted
during the year ending December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The per share
grant date weighted average estimated values of employee stock option grants
under the 1993 Plan, as well as the assumptions used to calculate such values
granted during the year ended December 31, 2005 were as follows:
2005
=====
Weighted average fair
value at grant date................................ $0.39
Estimated dividend yield................................ 0%
Risk free interest rate................................. 4.24%
Estimated volatility.................................... 0.44
Expected life in years.................................. 6
====
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The following table presents information regarding non-vested option
activity during the full year period ended December 31, 2006:
Weighted Average
Number of Grant-Date
Shares Fair Value
-------------- ----------------
Non-vested at January 1, 2007....... 204,000 $0.44
Vested during period................ (204,000) 0.41
-------------- ================
Non-vested at December 31, 2007..... - -
============== ================
The total fair value of shares vested during the full year periods ended
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, was $96,000 and $134,000, respectively.
As of December 31, 2007, there was no remaining unamortized compensation cost
related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements related to stock
options granted under the 1993 Plan.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price
volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the
subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, and
given the substantial changes in the price per share of the Company's Common
Stock, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a
reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. For a
summary of the pro forma amounts calculated in accordance with SFAS 123, see
Note 2.
Note 9 - Income Taxes
The components of income tax expense for continuing operations for the
years ended December 31 are as follows:
(in thousands) 2007 2006 2005
==== ==== ====
Income tax expense - current state and local.................. $ (50) $ (132) $ (95)
---------- ---------- --------
Total $ (50) $ (132) $ (95)
========== =========== ========
The components of pretax income (loss) and the difference between income
taxes from continuing operations, computed at the statutory federal rate of 35%
in 2007, 2006 and 2005, and the provision for income taxes from continuing
operations for the years ended December 31 follows:
(in thousands) 2007 2006 2005
======== ======= ========
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes............. $ (3,886) $ (5,331) $ (5,424)
========= ======== ========
Tax (expense) benefit:
Tax at statutory federal rate................................... $ 1,360 $ 1,866 $ 1,898
Accounting loss benefit not recognized.......................... (1,360) (1,866) (1,898)
State income taxes.............................................. (50) (132) (95)
--------- --------- ---------
Income tax expense.............................................. $ (50) $ (132) $ (95)
========= ========= =========
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007 or December 31,
2007. Further, no significant changes in unrecognized income tax benefits are
currently expected to occur over the next year. Interest and/or penalties
related to under payments of income taxes, if applicable, would be included in
interest expense and operating expenses, respectively. The accompanying
financial statements do not include any amounts for any such interest or
penalties. The Company's federal income tax returns for the years subsequent to
1992 have not been reviewed by the IRS or state authorities. As such, the
statute of limitations for federal and state purposes are generally closed for
tax years prior to 2004.
State income tax amounts for 2007 and 2006 primarily consist of a minimum
tax on capital to the state of Connecticut. In 2005, the Company utilized net
operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards and alternative minimum tax ("AMT") NOL
carryforwards as available to offset taxable income generated from the 2005 sale
of Two Soundview as discussed in Note 13 herein. However, due to limitations on
the amount of NOL carryforwards that could be utilized against taxable income,
an income tax provision of $400,000 for discontinued operations, attributable to
a provision for federal alternative minimum tax of $150,000 and a provision of
$250,000 for Connecticut state taxes was recorded in the fourth quarter ended
December 31, 2005.
In December 2006, the Company recorded other income of $1,201,000
attributable to an Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") interest refund, consented
to by the IRS in December 2006, and received by the Company in January 2007. The
refund resulted from the Company's pursuit of interest refund claims for several
prior tax years under a tax code provision which allowed for the retroactive
recovery of the interest differential where a taxpayer had a tax underpayment
(subject to higher interest payment rates) for one tax year and a simultaneous
tax overpayment (subject to lower interest refund rates) for another tax year.
The Company is continuing to pursue similar claims from several other tax years,
but at the current time the Company can give no assurances as to the final
amounts of any additional interest refunds, if any, or when they might be
received.
As a result of the Office of Thrift Supervision's December 4, 1992
placement of Carteret in receivership, under the management of the Resolution
Trust Corporation ("RTC")/Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), and
then proposed Treasury Reg. ss.1.597-4(g), the Company had previously filed its
1992 and subsequent federal income tax returns with Carteret disaffiliated from
the Company's consolidated federal income tax return. Based upon the impact of
Treasury Reg. ss.1.597-4(g), which was issued in final form on December 20,
1995, a continuing review of the Company's tax basis in Carteret, and the impact
of prior year tax return adjustments on the Company's 1992 federal income tax
return as filed, the Company decided not to make an election pursuant to final
Treasury Reg. ss.1.597-4(g) to disaffiliate Carteret from the Company's
consolidated federal income tax return effective as of December 4, 1992 (the
"Election Decision").
The Company has made numerous requests to the RTC/FDIC for tax information
pertaining to Carteret and the resulting successor institution, Carteret Federal
Savings Bank ("Carteret FSB"); however all of the information still has not been
received. Based on the Company's Election Decision, described above, and the
receipt of some of the requested information from the RTC/FDIC, the Company has
amended its 1992 consolidated federal income tax return to include the federal
income tax effects of Carteret and Carteret FSB (the "1992 Amended Return"). The
Company is still in the process of reviewing its consolidated federal income tax
returns for 1993 and subsequent years.
The Company anticipates that, as a result of filing a consolidated federal
income tax return with Carteret FSB, a total of approximately $170 million of
tax NOL carryforwards will be generated from the Company's tax basis in
Carteret/Carteret FSB as tax losses are incurred by Carteret FSB of which $158
million are still available for future use. Based on the Company's filing of the
1992 Amended Return , approximately $56 million of NOL carryforwards are
generated for tax year 1992 which will have expired in 2007 unless they are
absorbed in earler years based on inclusion of certain items in the consolidated
group, with the remaining approximately $102 million of NOL carryforwards to be
generated, expiring (if not utilized), no earlier than 2008. These NOL
carryforwards would be available to offset future taxable income, in addition to
the NOL carryforwards as further detailed below. The Company can give no
assurances with regard to the 1992 Amended Return or amended returns for
subsequent years, or the final amount or expiration of NOL carryforwards
ultimately generated from the Company's tax basis in Carteret.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
In March 2000, the Company filed several carryback claims and amendments to
previously filed carryback claims with the IRS (the "Carryback Claims") seeking
refunds from the IRS of alternative minimum tax and other federal income taxes
paid by the Company in prior years plus applicable IRS interest, based on the
filing of the 1992 Amended Return. In April 2003, IRS examiners issued a letter
to the Company proposing to disallow the Carryback Claims. The Company sought
administrative review of the letter by protesting to the Appeals Division of the
IRS. In February 2005, IRS Appeals officials completed their review of the
Carryback Claims, and disallowed them. The Company is currently considering
whether to file suit for the tax refunds it seeks, plus interest, with respect
to the Carryback Claims. Even if the Company files suit, the Company can give no
assurances as to the final amount of refunds, if any, or when they might be
received.
The FDIC has previously filed a federal income tax return for Carteret FSB
for 1995 (as well as other years), which indicates that Carteret FSB allegedly
could owe a 1995 federal income tax liability of $32 million, which including
interest and penalty thereon, could be in excess of $100 million, The FDIC has
stated to the United States Court of Federal Claims ("Court of Claims") that the
tax amounts are only estimates and are highly contingent. Based on proceedings
in other Supervisory Goodwill cases, it is possible that the IRS may try to
collect the alleged Carteret FSB federal income taxes from the Carteret FSB
receivership.
The Company believes that Carteret FSB federal income tax returns filed by
the FDIC were improperly filed and are neither accurate nor valid. As part of
the Supervisory Goodwill legal proceedings, the Company presented to the Court
of Claims various arguments to support the position that no federal income tax
would be owed as a result of the Carteret FSB receivership operations for tax
year 1995, or any other tax year; however, the Department of Justice and the
FDIC have stated to the Court of Claims that they do not believe the Court of
Claims has jurisdiction over that issue. The Supervisory Goodwill proceedings
remain pending in the Court of Claims.
Based on the information received to date, if the correct Carteret FSB
federal income tax results were included with the Company's originally filed
federal income tax returns, the Company, based upon consultation with its legal
and tax advisors,believes that no additional material federal income tax would
be owed by the Company. This analysis included among other items, a review of
the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns as prepared by the FDIC and the
correction of errors originally reported therein, the proper application of
federal NOL carryforwards and carrybacks, and the adherence to statute of
limitation provisions contained in the Internal Revenue Code, as amended.
As explained above, although the Company does not believe that Carteret
FSB or the Company will have a material federal income tax liability related to
Carteret FSB for tax year 1995 (or any other tax year), the Company can give no
assurances of the final amounts, if any, of federal income taxes owed by the
Carteret FSB receivership or by the Company as a result of the Carteret FSB
receivership operations.
The Company is continuing to try to resolve these matters as part of the
Supervisory Goodwill legal process and is also continuing to review the
Carteret FSB federal income tax returns and the results of their inclusion with
the Company's federal income tax returns as previously filed. The Company is
also reviewing the possibility of pursuing the Carryback Claims, as further
described above, which would have an impact on the analysis of the prior year
tax information. For further information on the Supervisory Goodwill legal
proceedings, see Note 10 herein.
The discussion of the Carteret FSB federal income tax results is intended
to provide details as to the potential interrelationship of the Carteret FSB
federal income tax returns with the Company's federal income tax positions. It
is not a reflection of any federal income tax liability of the Company arising
from the Carteret receivership operations.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Based upon the Company's federal income tax returns as filed from 1993 to
2006 (subject to IRS audit adjustments), excluding all effects of the inclusion
of Carteret/Carteret FSB from December 4, 1992 forward, as noted above, as of
December 31, 2006, the Company has NOL carryforwards available to reduce the
future federal taxable income, which expire if unused, as follows:
2009 $2,200,000
2010 5,300,000
2012 1,100,000
2018 5,400,000
2019 4,000,000
2020 2,600,000
2021 4,000,000
2022 3,200,000
2023 1,800,000
2024 700,000
2026 2,800,000
---------
$33,100,000
The Company's federal income tax returns for the years subsequent to 1992
have not been reviewed by the IRS and the Company has not been notified of any
potential tax audits by any federal, state or local tax authorities. The
utilization of certain carryforwards is subject to limitations under U.S.
federal income tax laws. In addition, the Company has approximately $21 million
of AMT credit carryforwards ("AMT Credits"), which are not subject to
expiration. Based on the filing of the Carryback Claims, as further discussed
above, the Company would seek to realize approximately $8 million of the $21
million of AMT Credits.
The Company has calculated a net deferred tax asset of $32 million as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, arising primarily from NOL's and
alternative minimum tax credits (not including the anticipated tax effects of
the NOL's expected to be generated from the Company's tax basis in Carteret,
resulting from the Election Decision, as more fully described above). A
valuation allowance has been established for the entire net deferred tax asset,
as management, at the current time, has no basis to conclude that realization is
more likely than not.
Note 10 - Legal Proceedings
The Company is or has been a party in a number of lawsuits or proceedings,
including the following:
(a) Supervisory Goodwill Litigation. During the third quarter of 1993, the
Company filed a claim against the United States, in the United States Court of
Federal Claims (the "Court of Federal Claims" or the "Court"), based upon the
impact of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of
1989 ("FIRREA") on the Company's investment in Carteret Savings Bank
("Carteret"). Approximately 120 other similar so-called "supervisory goodwill"
cases, were commenced by other financial institutions and/or their shareholders,
many are still pending in the Court of Federal Claims. Three of these cases,
Winstar Corp. v. United States, Glendale Federal Bank, FSB v. United States, and
Statesman Savings Holding Corp. v. United States (the "Consolidated Cases"),
which involve many of the same issues raised in the Company's suit, were
appealed to the United States Supreme Court (the "Supreme Court"). On July 1,
1996, the Supreme Court issued a decision in the Consolidated Cases. The Supreme
Court's decision affirmed the lower Court's grant of summary judgment in favor
of the plaintiffs on the issue of liability and remanded the cases for a
determination of damages. Although the decision in the Consolidated Cases is
beneficial to the Company's case, it is not necessarily indicative of the
ultimate outcome of the Company's action.
On September 18, 1996, the Court of Federal Claims entered an Omnibus Case
Management Order that will govern further proceedings in the Company's action
and most of the other so-called "Winstar-related" cases. On March 14, 1997, the
Court entered an order permitting the Federal Deposit Insurance Company ("FDIC")
to intervene as an additional plaintiff in forty-three cases, including the
Company's case, but not allowing the FDIC to be substituted as the sole
plaintiff in those cases.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
On March 20, 1998, the FDIC filed a motion for partial summary judgment
against the United States on certain liability issues, and the Company filed a
memorandum in support of that motion. Fact discovery for the Company was
completed November 30,1999 pursuant to an extension of time granted by the
Court. On September 9, 1999, the Company filed a Motion For Partial Summary
Judgment On Liability under a Fifth Amendment Takings claim theory of recovery.
On November 24, 1999, the FDIC, as successor to the rights of Carteret and as
Plaintiff-Intervenor in the case, filed a response brief opposing the Company's
Motion. On December 6, 1999, the Department of Justice (the "DOJ") (on behalf of
the United States) filed a brief opposing the Company's Motion For Partial
Summary Judgment On Liability and Cross-Moved for Summary Judgment On the
Company's Takings claim. On January 25, 2000, the Company responded to the DOJ's
brief and the FDIC's brief by filing a Brief (i) In Reply To Defendant's
Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Partial Summary Judgment, (ii) In
Opposition To Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, and (iii) In Reply
To FDIC's Response To Plaintiffs' Motion For Partial Summary Judgment. On
February 22, 2000 the DOJ filed a brief in Reply To Plaintiffs' Opposition To
Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment.
On October 2, 2000, Senior Judge Loren Smith of the Court of Federal Claims
("Judge Smith") heard oral arguments in the Company's Supervisory Goodwill case
against the United States government. The Court heard arguments both as to the
contractual liability of the United States to Carteret Savings Bank, and as to
the Company's claim against the United States under the Takings Clause of the
Fifth Amendment.
On August 25, 2003, the Court of Federal Claims issued a decision in which
it (i) ruled that the Government had entered into and breached its supervisory
goodwill contracts with the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Carteret; (ii)
rejected the Company's claim that it was entitled to recover damages directly
from the Government under the Takings Clause for the loss of Carteret; and (iii)
rejected the Company's claim that the Government had "illegally exacted" $62.5
million that the Company paid into Carteret subsequent to the Government's
breach of the Goodwill contracts. Specifically, the Court held that the Company
could not recover damages under the Takings Clause because it could be restored
to the position it was in before the breach through Carteret's breach of
contract action.
On September 17, 2003, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the FDIC and
to define the appropriate measure of Carteret's contract damages. On September
30, 2003, the FDIC, as plaintiff-intervenor in the case, and the United States,
as defendant in the case, each filed a separate response to the Company's
motion. The Company argued in its motion that because Carteret would not have
been seized but for the Government's breach of contract, no receivership deficit
would have been incurred. Accordingly, the Company argued that Carteret should
be entitled to recover contract damages that include both: (i) the full amount
of the receivership deficit, as an offset to the deficit and (ii) the full
amount of the positive value it would have had but for the breach.
Alternatively, the Company argued that, if Carteret is not entitled to recover
both these amounts, or if any award must be offset by the amount of the
receivership deficit, the Company should be entitled to demonstrate why the
receivership deficit has been erroneously overstated. The DOJ responded with the
theories that, among other things, Carteret would have failed even if
Supervisory Goodwill was counted. The FDIC, who is both the receiver for the
estate of Carteret (and hence its legal advocate in court) as well as a creditor
of the estate, took the position that the Court of Federal Claims has no
jurisdiction to review the accuracy, validity, or amount of the Carteret
receivership deficit reported by the FDIC. That receivership deficit consists of
the FDIC's subrogated claim against the thrift, interest, taxes, and
administrative expenses charged by the FDIC to the thrift. Because the
receivership deficit continues to accrue interest, it grows on a daily basis.
The FDIC has represented to the Court of Federal Claims that is does not expect
to present any expert testimony articulating a theory of damages for Carteret
that would exceed the current size of the receivership. While the failure to
seek damages in excess of the receivership deficit has previously been held to
be cause for dismissal for lack of standing, the FDIC has stated that it
believes it still has standing in this case based upon the damage theories it
expects the Company to present.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIAIRES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
On October 1, 2003, the Court held a telephonic status conference pursuant
to an order set forth in the August 25, 2003 opinion. Pursuant to that status
conference, the Court ordered that through their additional briefing on the
Company's Motion to Dismiss the FDIC and to define the appropriate measure of
Carteret's contract damages (i.e., through the Company's reply brief and the
surreply brief granted to the FDIC and the United States), the parties should
address the question of, "whether the Court has the power to review the amount
of the receivership deficit as administered by the FDIC." In an order dated
October 16, 2003, the Court modified the briefing schedule such that the Company
filed its reply brief as required on October 31, 2003, and the surreply brief of
the FDIC and the United States were filed as required in November, 2003. The
Court held oral argument on this issue on November 20, 2003. The DOJ and the
FDIC filed briefs arguing that (1) the Court of Federal Claims had no authority
to scrutinize the validity of the receivership deficit reported by the FDIC and
(2) the Court should dismiss AmBase's remaining damages claims because they were
allegedly waived. On August 31, 2004, the Court denied the Company's Motion to
Dismiss the FDIC, but granted the Company's Motion to Define the Measure of
Carteret's Contract Damages to the extent it requested the Court to consider the
size and value of the FDIC's receivership deficit when calculating damages. The
Court subsequently conducted a status conference on October 4, 2004, and ordered
the Company to submit a proposed litigation time-line to the Court by October
22, 2004 which was timely submitted. The Court ordered the United States and the
FDIC to respond to the Company's proposed litigation time-line by November 5,
2004 which was timely submitted. A status conference was held on January 11,
2005. On January 12, 2005, the Court ordered that pursuant to the Court's order
from the bench, the Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the August 31,
2004 Ruling, and, in the Alternative, to dismiss the Stockholder Derivative
Claim and the Complaint-in-Intervention is denied. The Court further ordered
that this matter be stayed for 30 days for the Defendant and/or
Plaintiff-Intervenor to consider filing a Request for Certification for
Interlocutory Appeal. The Court held a telephonic status conference on February
11, 2005 at which time the Court ordered that fact discovery was to resume on
February 14, 2005 and would continue for at least three (3) months. The Court
further scheduled a telephonic status conference for May 2005, to discuss the
need for further discovery.
On January 12, 2005, Judge Smith denied the government's motion to dismiss
the Company's remaining claims arising out of damages for breach of contract. On
March 15, 2005, the United States Department of Justice and the FDIC each filed
motions requesting that Judge Smith certify for immediate appeal his ruling that
the Company is entitled to challenge the validity of the receivership deficit.
The Company filed its reply to these motions on March 29, 2005. In April 2005,
Judge Smith heard oral argument on the United States Department of Justice and
the FDIC motions requesting that Judge Smith certify for immediate appeal his
ruling that the Company is entitled to challenge the validity of the
receivership deficit. Because Judge Smith's ruling on the receivership deficit
issue was not a final order, both Judge Smith and the Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit would have to agree to an appeal of that issue at this time.
Following the April 2005 oral argument, Judge Smith entered an order, on April
25, 2005, staying resolution of the motions to certify an interlocutory appeal
pending the holding of a "show cause" hearing. Judge Smith indicated at the oral
argument that the purpose of the show cause hearing was to allow the Company to
outline the evidence and arguments it was prepared to offer in order to
challenge the validity and size of the receivership deficit. Judge Smith
directed the parties to attempt to reach agreement regarding a schedule for the
completion of discovery on receivership deficit issues, and he directed the
parties to submit to the Court such an agreed proposed discovery schedule, or,
if the parties are unable to reach agreement, separate proposed schedules for
discovery, in early May 2005. Judge Smith further encouraged the parties to
discuss the procedures and schedule for the show cause hearing, and to provide
the Court with a proposed order on such matters.
In accordance with the Court's direction, the parties agreed upon a
schedule for the completion of fact discovery and procedures for the show cause
proceeding. In accordance with the parties' agreement, Judge Smith entered an
order on May 23, 2005, providing that fact discovery would be completed within
45 days of the completion of document production by the Government. The May 23,
2005, order further provided that (i) 45 days after the close of discovery, the
Company was to file a statement of issues summarizing the respects in which the
receivership books allegedly overstate or misstate the receivership deficit;
(ii) 45 days after the filing of the Company's statement of issues, the United
States and the FDIC were to file responses; and (iii) 15 days after the filing
of such responses, the Company was to file a reply.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIAIRES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
In May and June of 2005, the Government provided the Company with access to
Carteret's documents and documents relating to the management of the
receivership. The Company selected approximately 3 million pages of documents to
be imaged at the Government's expense. In September 2005, a status conference
was held before Judge Smith. The Government indicated that it would complete
production of all the images of the selected materials by the end of September
2005. Additionally, at the status conference, all parties agreed that the
schedule previously set forth by the Court's May 23, 2005 order should be
changed in one respect: the Company would be given 75 days from the completion
of the document production to complete discovery. The Court issued an order on
September 26, 2005 memorializing this agreement. On January 11, 2006, the Court
held a status conference. At that time, the Court indicated that the document
production would be deemed complete as of that date. The Court's order of
January 13, 2006, memorialized this ruling. Accordingly, fact discovery was
completed in April 2006, and the Company's statement of issues was ultimately
filed in June of 2006. In May 2006, the Company served on the Government an
expert report in support of some of the arguments the Company made regarding the
size of the receivership deficit. The Company's expert was deposed in July 2006.
In early August 2006, the Government submitted its own expert report on
receivership deficit issues, and in October 2006, the Company deposed the
Government's expert. In late August 2006, the Government filed a response to the
Company's Statement of Issues, and in September 2006, the FDIC filed its own
response to the Statement of Issues. The Company filed its reply in support of
its Statement of Issues in October 2006. A status conference was held in
November 2006 and December 2006, to discuss further proceedings. On December 13,
2006, the Court entered an order denying defendant's request that the Court
allow an immediate appeal of the Court's ruling that it had jurisdiction to
consider the validity of the receivership deficit. The Court also found that it
continued to have jurisdiction to hear the case. The Court also ordered the
parties to enter a schedule for expert discovery.
On April 13, 2007, Judge Smith issued an order scheduling pretrial, and
trial deadlines and dates, including scheduling a trial to commence on February
11, 2008. In accordance with the Court's scheduling in May 2007, the Company
submitted its expert report. The Government deposed the Company's expert in June
2007. In July 2007, the Government identified its damages experts and submitted
its expert reports in September 2007. The Company deposed the Governments
experts in October 2007.
Pursuant to the Court order, the Court heard oral argument on November 14,
2007 at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, to decide whether the trial could be
avoided by summary judgment, pursuant to papers filed by the parties on November
7, 2007 and November 19, 2007. On November 30, 2007, the Court ordered the
parties to continue with the trial schedule as previously set forth.
Subsequently on December 7, 2007, the parties exchanged exhibit and witness
lists; on December 14, 2007 the parties submitted an hour-by-hour anticipated
trial schedule to the Court; on December 21, 2007 Plaintiffs and FDIC-R filed
Appendix A submissions; on January 8, 2008 a pretrial conference was held in
U.S. Court of Federal Claims; on January 21, 2008 the Defendant filed Appendix A
submissions; and on February 11, 2008 trial was commenced.
Trial testimony of fact and expert witnesses for the Company, the DOJ, and
the FDIC is scheduled to be completed during the week of March 31, 2008. After
the completion of trial testimony, it is expected that the Court will issue a
post trial scheduling order, providing for (i) the parties to file written
answers to a series of questions to be set forth by Judge Smith; (ii) the filing
of post trial briefs by the Company, and DOJ and the FDIC; and (iii) the
establishment of a date for the parties' presentation of closing arguments.
Both the Court of Federal Claims and the Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit have issued numerous decisions in cases that involve claims against the
United States based upon its breach of its contracts with savings and loan
institutions through its 1989 enactment of FIRREA. In particular, the Federal
Circuit has issued decisions rejecting Takings Clause claims advanced by
shareholders of failed thrifts. Castle v. United States, 301F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir.
2002); Bailey v. United States, 341 F. 3d 1342 (Fed. Cir 2003). In June 2004,
the United States Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari filed by
Bailey. The Court of Federal Claims decisions and certain filings in the
Company's case, as well as other decisions in Winstar related cases, are
publicly available on the Court of Claims web site at www.cofc.uscourts.gov. In
addition, decisions in Winstar-related cases that have been issued by the U.S.
Court of Appeals, the court that hears appeals from decisions by the Court of
Claims, may be found on that court's website at www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Decisions
in other Winstar related cases may be relevant to the Company's Supervisory
Goodwill claims, but are not necessarily indicative of the ultimate outcome of
the Company's actions.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIAIRES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 11 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash
equivalents approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these
instruments. The fair value of investment securities - held to maturity and
investment securities available for sale are based on current market quotations.
The carrying value of applicable other liabilities approximates their fair
value. See note 13 herein for information regarding the Company's sale of Two
Soundview in July 2005.
Note 12 - Property Owned
The Company owns one commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut
that contains approximately 14,500 square feet. The Company utilizes
approximately 3,500 square feet for its executive offices; the remaining space
is currently unoccupied and available for lease. Depreciation expense is
recorded on a straight-line basis over 39 years. The building is carried at
cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $358,000 and $283,000 at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. See note 13 herein for information regarding the
Company's sale of Two Soundview in July 2005.
Although the portion of the building not being utilized by the Company is
currently unoccupied and available for lease, based on the Company's analysis,
including but not limited to current market rents in the area, leasing values,
and comparable property sales, the Company believes the property's fair market
value exceeds the property's current carrying value; and, therefore the carrying
value of the property as of December 31, 2007 has not been impaired.
Note 13 - Discontinued Operations
In May 2005, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Two Soundview,
originally purchased in December 2002, to Ceruzzi Holdings, LLC, an unaffiliated
third party. In July 2005, the Company completed the sale of Two Soundview. The
sale price was $28,000,000 less normal real estate closing costs and
adjustments. As a result of the sale of Two Soundview, the results of operations
of Two Soundview have been designated as discontinued operations, and the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods presented herein have been
retroactively reclassified to report the income from discontinued operations
separately from the results of continuing operations by excluding the operating
revenues and expenses of discontinued operations from the respective statement
captions, in accordance with SFAS 144. A gain from the sale, of $10,298,000, is
reflected in the Company's financial statements for the year ending December 31,
2005.
Net gain on sale of real estate is as follows:
2005
(in thousands) =====
Gross sales price............................................................. $28,000
Less: Transactions costs..................................................... (558)
-------
Net cash proceeds............................................................. 27,442
Less:
Real estate carrying value (net of accumulated depreciation of $722,000).. (16,588)
Other assets.............................................................. (556)
-------
Net gain on sale of real estate............................................... $10,298
=======
Transaction costs above include broker commissions, transfer taxes, and
legal and other fees. Other assets above includes $519,000 of deferred rental
revenue resulting from the recognition of rental revenue on a straight-line
basis over the terms of tenant leases versus contractual lease payment terms,
and $37,000 of real estate commissions previously capitalized.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIAIRES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Income from discontinued operations, as summarized below, for the twelve
months periods ended December 31, 2005, reflects the results of operations of
Two Soundview and the net gain realized upon disposition.
Income from discontinued operations is as follows:
(in thousands) 2005
Revenues: ====
Rental income..................................................... $ 1,158
Operating expenses:
Professional and outside services................................. 25
Property operating and maintenance................................ 231
Depreciation...................................................... 140
Insurance......................................................... 11
Other operating................................................... 2
----------
409
----------
Income from operation of discontinued property.................... 749
Gain on disposition............................................... 10,298
Income tax expense on discontinued operations..................... (400)
----------
Income from discontinued operations............................... $ 10,647
==========
The Company utilized NOL carryforwards and AMT NOL carryforwards as
available to offset taxable income generated from sale of Two Soundview as
discussed in Note 9 to the Company's consolidated financial statements. However,
due to limitations on the amount of NOL carryforwards that could be utilized
against taxable income, an income tax provision of $400,000 for discontinued
operations attributable to a provision for federal alternative minimum tax of
$150,000 and a provision of $250,000 for Connecticut state taxes was recorded in
the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2005.
Note 14 - Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)
Summarized quarterly financial information follows:
First Second Third Fourth Full
(in thousands, except per share data) Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Year
2007: ======= ======= ======= ======= =====
Revenues................................ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Operating expenses...................... 1,689 2,152 858 802 5,501
Operating loss.......................... (1,689) (2,152) (858) (802) (5,501)
===== ====== ===== ===== =====
Net loss................................ $(1,093) $ (1,655) $ (588) $ (600) $(3,936)
===== ====== ===== ===== =====
Per common share data:
Net loss................................ $ (0.03) $ (0.03) $(0.01) $ (0.01) $ (0.09)
===== ====== ===== ===== =====
2006:
Revenues................................ $ 41 $ 49 $ 2 $ - $ 92
Operating expenses...................... 1,913 2,729 1,724 1,521 7,887
Operating loss.......................... (1,872) (2,680) (1,722) (1,521) (7,795)
===== ====== ===== ===== =====
Net income (loss)....................... $ (1,485) $ (2,184) $(1,964) $ 170 $(5,463)
===== ====== ===== ===== =====
Per common share data:
Net income (loss)....................... $ (0.03) $ (0.05) $ (0.04) $ - $ (0.12)
====== ====== ===== ===== =====
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
(a) Previous independent registered public accounting firm
On September 11, 2007, the Company dismissed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
its independent registered public accounting firm. The Company's Accounting and
Audit Committee and the Board of Directors participated in and approved the
decision to change its independent registered public accounting firm. The
reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on the financial statements for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 contained no adverse opinion or
disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty,
audit scope or accounting principle. During the fiscal years ended December 31,
2005 and 2006 and through September 11, 2007, there were no disagreements with
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
would have caused them to make reference thereto in their reports on the
financial statements for such years. During the fiscal years ended December 31,
2005 and 2006 and through September 11, 2007, there were no reportable events
(as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).
The Company requested that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP furnish it with a
letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or
not it agreed with the above statements. A copy of such letter, dated September
14, 2007, was filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 14, 2007.
(b) New independent registered public accounting firm
The Company engaged UHY LLP as its new independent registered public
accounting firm as of September 11, 2007. During the fiscal years ended December
31, 2005 and 2006 and through September 11, 2007, the Company had not consulted
with UHY LLP regarding any of the matters described in Item 304(a)(2)(i) or Item
304(a)(2)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 9AT. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange
Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure based on the definition of "disclosure
controls and procedures" in Rule 13a-15(e). In designing and evaluating the
disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management
necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As of December 31, 2007, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including
the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Company's Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation
of the Company's management, including its principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, the Company's management conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the
framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the evaluation
under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, the Company's
management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2007.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's
registered pubic accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's
registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's
report in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no significant change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information concerning executive officers required by this item is set
forth following Item 4 of Part I of this report under the caption "Executive
Officers of the Registrant", pursuant to General Instruction G to Form 10-K. For
the information required to be set forth by the Company in response to this item
concerning directors of the Company, see the Company's definitive Proxy
Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 16, 2008,
under the captions "Proposal No. 1 - Election of Director" and "Information
Concerning the Board and its Committees", which is incorporated herein by
reference, which the Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission not later than 120 days after the close of its 2007 fiscal year.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other senior officers. A copy of the Code
of Ethics was filed with the SEC as Exhibit 14 to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
For the information required to be set forth by the Company in response to
this item, see the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be held on May 16, 2008, under the captions "Executive
Compensation," "Employment Contracts," and "Compensation of Directors" which are
incorporated herein by reference, which the Company intends to file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of
its 2007 fiscal year.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table summarizes information about securities authorized for
issuance under equity compensation plans of the Company at December 31, 2007 as
follows:
Shares to be issued Weighted average
upon exercise of exercise price of Shares available for
outstanding options outstanding options future issuance
=================== =================== ====================
Equity Compensation
Plans approved
by stockholders 876,000 $ 1.01 4,124,000
Equity Compensation
Plan not approved
by stockholders - - 110,000
-------------- ------------------- ---------------
Total 876,000 $ 1.01 4,234,000
============== =================== ===============
Plan not approved by stockholders
The Company has 110,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under
the AmBase Corporation Stock Bonus Plan (the "Stock Bonus Plan"), which was
approved by the Board of Directors of the Company in 1989. The purpose of the
Stock Bonus Plan is to encourage individual performance and to reward eligible
employees whose performance, special achievements, longevity of service to the
Company or suggestions make a significant improvement or contribution to the
growth and profitability of the Company. The Stock Bonus Plan is administered by
the Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors. Members of the Personnel
Committee are not eligible for an award pursuant to the Stock Bonus Plan. The
Company's President may also designate eligible employees to receive awards,
which are not to be in excess of 100 shares of Common Stock. No fees or expenses
of any kind are to be charged to a participant. Any employee of the Company,
except for certain officers or directors of the Company, are eligible to receive
shares under the Stock Bonus Plan. Distributions of shares may be made from
authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares or shares purchased on the open
market.
For other information required to be set forth by the Company in response
to this item, see the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 16, 2008, under the caption "Stock
Ownership", which is incorporated herein by reference, which the Company intends
to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days
after the close of its 2007 fiscal year.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
For the information required to be set forth by the Company in response to
this item, see the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be held on May 16, 2008, under the captions "Proposal No. 1 -
Election of Directors" and "Information Concerning the Board and its
Committees," which are incorporated herein by reference, which the Company
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120
days after the close of its 2007 fiscal year.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information concerning Principal Accounting Fees and Services is set
forth by the Company under the heading "Proposal 2 - Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for its
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 16, 2008, which is incorporated
herein by reference, which the Company intends to file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of its 2007 fiscal
year.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Documents filed as a part of this report:
1. Index to Financial Statements: Page
AmBase Corporation and Subsidiaries:
Report of UHY LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm..................................16
Report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm...............17
Consolidated Statements of Operations.............................................................18
Consolidated Balance Sheets.......................................................................19
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity........................................20
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)............................................20
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.............................................................21
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................................................22
2. Index to Financial Statements Schedules:
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(b) 3. Exhibits: 3A. Restated Certificate of Incorporation of AmBase
Corporation (as amended through February 12, 1991) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3A to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1990).
3B. By-Laws of AmBase Corporation (as amended through March 15, 1996),
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3B to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995).
4. Rights Agreement dated as of February 10, 1986 between the Company and
American Stock Transfer and Trust Co. (as amended March 24, 1989, November 20,
1990, February 12, 1991, October 15, 1993, February 1, 1996 and November 1, 2000
and November 9, 2005), (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990, the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1993,
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995,
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2000, and the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, respectively).
10A. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit A to the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders held on May 28, 1998).
10B. 1994 Senior Management Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A to the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders held on May 27, 1994).
10C. AmBase Officers and Key Employees Stock Purchase and Loan Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10E to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989).
10D. AmBase Supplemental Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10C to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1989) and as amended March 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10E to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005).
10E. Employment Agreement dated as of March 30, 2006 between Richard A.
Bianco and the Company, for employment from June 1, 2007 through May 31, 2012,
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10H to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005), and as amended January 1, 2008,
included herein.
14. AmBase Corporation - Code of Ethics as adopted by Board of Directors
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003).
21. Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of UHY LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
23.2 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm.
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14.
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14.
32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
Exhibits, except as otherwise indicated above, are filed herewith.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMBASE CORPORATION
/s/ RICHARD A. BIANCO
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 28, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities on the dates indicated.
/s/ RICHARD A. BIANCO /s/ JOHN P. FERRARA
Chairman, President, Vice President, Chief Financial
Chief Executive Office and Director Officer and Controller
Date: March 28, 2008 (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
Date: March 28, 2008
/s/ ROBERT E. LONG /s/ SALVATORE TRANI
Director Director
Date: March 28, 2008 Date: March 28, 2008
/s/ PHILIP M. HALPERN
Director
Date: March 28, 2008
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III. REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
----------- ------------------ ----------------- ---------------- ------------------
Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to Gross Amount at which Carried at
Initial Cost to Company Acquisition the Close of the Period
======================= ================ ================================
Building & Building &
Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total
=========== ============ ====== ============ ============ ==== ============ ======
Office Building:
Greenwich, CT... $ - $ 554 $ 1,880 $ 20 $554 $ 1,900 $2,454
------------ ------- ----------- ------------ ---- ------------ ------
Total........... $ - $ 554 $ 1,880 $ 20 $554 $ 1,900 $2,454
============ ======= =========== ============ ==== ============ ======
[Additional columns below]
[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
COLUMN A COLUMN F COLUMN G COLUMN H COLUMN I
----------- ----------------- ----------------- ---------------- ---------------------
Accumulated Life on Which Depreciated
Description Depreciation Date Constructed Date Acquired Latest Income Statement
========== ================= ================= ================ =======================
Office Building:
Greenwich, CT... $ 334 1970 Apr.-01 39 years
----------------- ================= ================= ========================
Total........... $ 334
================
[a] Reconciliation of total real estate carrying value is as follows:
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, 2007 December 31, 2006 December 31, 2005
================= ================= =================
Balance at beginning of year........... $ 2,454 $ 2,454 $ 19,764
Improvements........................... - - -
Acquisitions........................... - - -
Disposition............................. - - (17,310)
---------------- ----------------- ------------------
Balance at end of year................. $ 2,454 $ 2,454 $ 2,454
================ ================= ==================
Total cost for federal tax
purposes at end of each year........... $ 2,454 $ 2,454 $ 2,454
................... ================ ================= ===================
[b] Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation as follows:
Balance at beginning of year........... $ 283 $ 232 $ 763
Depreciation expense................... 51 51 191
Dispositions........................... - - (722)
---------------- ----------------- ------------------
Balance at end of year................. $ 334 $ 283 $ 232
================ ================= ==================
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Board of Directors
Richard A. Bianco Robert E. Long Salvatore Trani Philip M. Halpern
Chairman, President and Chairman, Chief Executive Vice Managing Partner
Chief Executive Officer Executive Officer President Collier, Halpern, Newberg,
AmBase Corporation GLB Group, Inc. BGC Partners, L.P. Nolletti & Bock, LLP
AmBase Officers
Richard A. Bianco John P. Ferrara Joseph R. Bianco
Chairman, President and Vice President, Chief Financial Officer Treasurer
Chief Executive Officer and Controller
INVESTOR INFORMATION
Annual Meeting of Stockholders Corporate Headquarters
The 2008 Annual Meeting is currently scheduled to be held AmBase Corporation
at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time, on Friday, May 16, 2008, at: 100 Putnam Green, 3rd Floor
Greenwich, CT 06830-6027
Hyatt Regency Hotel (203) 532-2000
1800 East Putnam Avenue
Greenwich, CT 06870
Stockholder Inquiries
Common Stock Trading Stockholder inquiries, including requests for the
==================== following: (i) change of address; (ii) replacement
AmBase stock is traded through one or more market-makers of lost stock certificates; (iii) Common Stock
with quotations made available in the "pink sheets" name registration changes; (iv) Quarterly Reports
published by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. on Form 10-Q; (v) Annual Reports on Form 10-K;
(vi) proxy material; and (vii) information
Issue Abbreviation Ticker Symbol regarding stockholdings, should be directed to:
Common Stock AmBase ABCP American Stock Transfer and Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
Transfer Agent and Registrar Attention: Shareholder Services
============================ (800) 937-5449 or (718) 921-8200 Ext. 6820
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company In addition, the Company's public reports,
59 Maiden Lane including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual
New York, NY 10038 Reports on Form 10-K and Proxy Statements, can be
Attention: Shareholder Services obtained through the Securities and Exchange
(800) 937-5449 or (718) 921-8200 Ext. 6820 Commission EDGAR Database over the World Wide Web
at www.sec.gov.
Independent Registered Public Accountants Number of Stockholders
UHY LLP As of February 29, 2008, there were
Maritime Center approximately 14,300 stockholders.
555 Long Wharf Drive
New Haven, CT 06511