Edgar Filing: QUAKER CHEMICAL CORP

form10q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-12019

QUAKER CHEMICAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Pennsylvania		23-0993790
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


One Quaker Park, 901 E. Hector Street, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania		19428 – 2380
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 610-832-4000

Not Applicable

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

	Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer x
	Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting Company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding on June 30, 2011		12,823,294

QUAKER CHEMICAL CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES


		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	25
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	27
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	27
Item 6.	Exhibits	28
Signatures		28

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

	Unaudited
	(Dollars in thousands,
	except par value
	and share amounts)
	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010*
	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010*
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	23,541	$	25,766
Accounts receivable, net		137,402		116,266
Inventories
Raw materials and supplies		43,580		31,909
Work-in-process and finished goods		33,119		28,932
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		16,032		12,609
Total current assets		253,674		215,482
Property, plant and equipment, at cost		218,119		205,359
Less accumulated depreciation		(138,414)		(128,824)
Net property, plant and equipment		79,705		76,535
Goodwill		55,282		52,758
Other intangible assets, net		23,127		24,030
Investments in associated companies		9,407		9,218
Deferred income taxes		25,784		28,846
Other assets		43,840		42,561
Total assets	$	490,819	$	449,430

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt	$	836	$	890
Accounts and other payables		79,465		63,893
Accrued compensation		11,026		17,140
Other current liabilities		19,808		19,268
Total current liabilities		111,135		101,191
Long-term debt		33,628		73,855
Deferred income taxes		6,817		6,108
Other non-current liabilities		77,534		81,177
Total liabilities		229,114		262,331
Equity
Common stock $1 par value; authorized 30,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding
2011 – 12,823,294 shares; 2010 – 11,492,142 shares		12,823		11,492
Capital in excess of par value		87,249		38,275
Retained earnings		158,998		144,347
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(5,507)		(13,736)
Total Quaker shareholders’ equity		253,563		180,378
Noncontrolling interest		8,142		6,721
Total equity		261,705		187,099
Total liabilities and equity	$	490,819	$	449,430

*	Condensed from audited financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income

	Unaudited						Unaudited
	(Dollars in thousands,						(Dollars in thousands,
	except per						except per
	share and share amounts)						share and share amounts)
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net sales	$	167,792		$	135,991		$	327,657		$	264,311
Cost of goods sold		114,026			87,460			221,157			168,440
Gross profit		53,766			48,531			106,500			95,871
Selling, general and administrative expenses		38,825			35,118			77,459			68,787
Operating income		14,941			13,413			29,041			27,084
Other income, net		791			1,123			1,330			1,886
Interest expense		(1,200	)		(1,386	)		(2,418	)		(2,697	)
Interest income		271			343			543			527
Income before taxes and equity in net income of associated companies		14,803			13,493			28,496			26,800
Taxes on income before equity in net income of associated companies		4,499			4,143			7,321			7,324
Income before equity in net income of associated companies		10,304			9,350			21,175			19,476
Equity in net income of associated companies		251			384			610			295
Net income		10,555			9,734			21,785			19,771
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		714			581			1,344			1,199
Net income attributable to Quaker Chemical Corporation	$	9,841		$	9,153		$	20,441		$	18,572
Per share data:
Net income attributable to Quaker Chemical Corporation Common
Shareholders – basic	$	0.80		$	0.82		$	1.72		$	1.66
Net income attributable to Quaker Chemical Corporation Common
Shareholders – diluted	$	0.79		$	0.80		$	1.69		$	1.64
Dividends declared	$	0.24		$	0.235		$	0.475		$	0.465

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

	Unaudited
	(Dollars in thousands)
	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	21,785		$	19,771
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		5,405			5,068
Amortization		973			462
Equity in undistributed earnings of associated companies, net of dividends		(32	)		(233	)
Deferred compensation and other, net		4,162			(357	)
Stock-based compensation		1,854			1,663
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment		(78	)		(22	)
Insurance settlement realized		(864	)		(772	)
Pension and other postretirement benefits		(4,168	)		(2,227	)
Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in current assets and current liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		(17,392	)		(10,645	)
Inventories		(13,986	)		(7,181	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(4,029	)		(1,641	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		6,537			6,409
Net cash provided by operating activities		167			10,295

Cash flows from investing activities
Investments in property, plant and equipment		(6,641	)		(3,468	)
Proceeds from disposition of assets		221			59
Payments related to acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(717	)		—
Insurance settlement received and interest earned		42			5,070
Change in restricted cash, net		822			(1,940	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(6,273	)		(279	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase in short-term borrowings		—			1,263
Repayment of long-term debt		(40,402	)		(2,614	)
Dividends paid		(5,413	)		(5,119	)
Stock options exercised, other		146			1,663
Excess tax benefit related to stock option exercises		162			1,236
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of related expenses		48,143			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		2,636			(3,571	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		1,245			(3,890	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(2,225	)		2,555
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		25,766			25,051
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	23,541		$	27,606

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Non-cash activities:
Excess tax benefit related to stock option exercises	$	—		$	882
Restricted insurance receivable (See also Note 13 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)		—			5,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Condensed Financial Information

The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States for interim financial reporting and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, except as discussed below) which are necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Effective January 1, 2010, the Venezuelan economy was considered to be hyperinflationary under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, since it has experienced a rate of general inflation in excess of 100% over the latest three-year period, based upon the blended Consumer Price Index and National Consumer Price Index. Accordingly, all gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of the Company’s Venezuelan 50% equity affiliate (Kelko Quaker Chemical, S.A.) are required to be recorded directly in the statement of operations. On January 8, 2010, the Venezuelan government announced the devaluation of the Bolivar Fuerte. As a result of the devaluation, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $0.03 per diluted share in the first quarter of 2010.

As part of the Company’s chemical management services, certain third-party product sales to customers are managed by the Company. Where the Company acts as principal, revenue is recognized on a gross reporting basis at the selling price negotiated with customers. Where the Company acts as agent, such revenue is recorded using net reporting as service revenues, at the amount of the administrative fee earned by the Company for ordering the goods. Third-party products transferred under arrangements resulting in net reporting totaled $24,276 and $27,995 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Note 2 – Recently Issued Accounting Standards

The FASB updated its guidance in June 2011 regarding presentation of comprehensive income. Comprehensive income will be required to be presented with the Consolidated Statement of Income or as a separate financial statement immediately following the Consolidated Statement of Income. Presentation of comprehensive income will no longer be presented as part of the Statement of Shareholders’ Equity. The guidance is effective for annual and interim fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this guidance.

The FASB also updated its guidance in May 2011 regarding disclosures pertaining to assets and liabilities measured at fair value. The guidance requires quantitative measures regarding unobservable inputs for Level 3 assets and liabilities. Additionally, the guidance requires a sensitivity analysis regarding those inputs. The guidance is effective for annual and interim fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this guidance.

Note 3 – Income Taxes and Uncertain Income Tax Positions

The Company's year-to-date 2011 effective tax rate of 25.7% was lower than the year-to-date 2010 effective tax rate of 27.3%. Both year-to-date effective tax rates reflect the derecognition of uncertain tax positions due the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations for certain tax years of approximately $0.11 per diluted share. The most significant other item affecting the comparison of year-to-date effective tax rates is a higher utilization of foreign tax credits in 2011 which were previously not benefited.

The FASB’s guidance regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes the recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. The guidance further requires the determination of whether the benefits of tax positions will be more likely than not sustained upon audit based upon the technical merits of the tax position. For tax positions that are determined to be more likely than not sustained upon audit, a company recognizes the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement in the financial statements. For tax positions that are not determined to be more likely than not sustained upon audit, a company does not recognize any portion of the benefit in the financial statements. Additionally, the guidance provides for derecognition, classification, penalties and interest, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

At December 31, 2010, the Company’s cumulative liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits was $10,464. As of June 30, 2011, the Company’s cumulative liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits was $11,282.

The Company continues to recognize interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as a component of taxes on income in its Consolidated Statement of Income. The Company had accrued $1,824 for cumulative interest and $857 for cumulative penalties at December 31, 2010. The Company has recognized $184 and $59 for interest and $145 and $424 for penalties on its Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and, as of June 30, 2011, the Company had accrued $2,008 for cumulative interest and $1,336 for cumulative penalties.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company derecognized uncertain tax positions due to expiration of the applicable statutes of limitations for certain tax years. As a result, the Company recognized a $922 decrease in its cumulative liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company derecognized several uncertain tax positions due to the liquidation of the Company’s subsidiary in Wuxi China for certain tax years of approximately $36.

The Company estimates that during the year ending December 31, 2011 it will reduce its cumulative liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits by approximately $1,400 to $1,600 due to the expiration of the statute of limitations with regard to certain tax positions. This estimated reduction in the cumulative liability for unrecognized tax benefits does not consider any increase in liability for unrecognized tax benefits with regard to existing tax positions or any increase in cumulative liability for unrecognized tax benefits with regard to new tax positions for the year ending December 31, 2011.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. Federal income tax, as well as the income tax of various state and foreign tax jurisdictions. Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions include the Netherlands from 2005, United Kingdom, Italy, Brazil, and Spain from 2006, China and the United States from 2007 and various domestic state tax jurisdictions from 1993.

Note 4 – Fair Value Measurements

The FASB’s guidance regarding fair value measurements establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. The guidance does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting guidance that requires or permits fair value measurements.

The guidance utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

The Company values its interest rate swaps, company-owned life insurance policies and various deferred compensation assets and liabilities, as well as acquisition related contingent consideration at fair value. The Company’s assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement are as follows (in thousands):

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011
	Fair Value		Using Fair Value Hierarchy
	as of
Assets	June 30, 2011		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Company-owned life insurance	$	1,557	$	—	$	1,557	$	—
Company-owned life insurance - Deferred compensation assets		546		—		546		—
Other deferred compensation assets
Large capitalization registered investment companies		69		69		—		—
Mid capitalization registered investment companies		4		4		—		—
Small capitalization registered investment companies		8		8		—		—
International developed and emerging markets registered investment
companies		39		39		—		—
Fixed income registered investment companies		8		8		—		—

Total	$	2,231	$	128	$	2,103	$	—

			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011
	Fair Value		Using Fair Value Hierarchy
	as of
Liabilities	June 30, 2011		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Deferred compensation liabilities
Large capitalization registered investment companies	$	341	$	341	$	—	$	—
Mid capitalization registered investment companies		89		89		—		—
Small capitalization registered investment companies		74		74		—		—
International developed and emerging markets registered investment
companies		206		206		—		—
Fixed income registered investment companies		49		49		—		—
Fixed general account		173		—		173		—
Interest rate derivatives		759		—		759		—
Acquisition related contingent consideration		5,738		—		—		5,738

Total	$	7,429	$	759	$	932	$	5,738

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010
	Fair Value		Using Fair Value Hierarchy
	as of
Assets	December 31, 2010		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Company-owned life insurance	$	2,033	$	—	$	2,033	$	—
Company-owned life insurance - Deferred compensation assets		593		—		593		—
Other deferred compensation assets
Large capitalization registered investment companies		69		69		—		—
Mid capitalization registered investment companies		4		4		—		—
Small capitalization registered investment companies		8		8		—		—
International developed and emerging markets registered investment
companies		40		40		—		—
Fixed income registered investment companies		10		10		—		—

Total	$	2,757	$	131	$	2,626	$	—

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010
	Fair Value		Using Fair Value Hierarchy
	as of
Liabilities	December 31, 2010		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Deferred compensation liabilities
Large capitalization registered investment companies	$	347	$	347	$	—	$	—
Mid capitalization registered investment companies		88		88		—		—
Small capitalization registered investment companies		71		71		—		—
International developed and emerging markets registered investment
companies		213		213		—		—
Fixed income registered investment companies		52		52		—		—
Fixed general account		182		—		182		—
Interest rate derivatives		1,026		—		1,026		—
Acquisition related contingent consideration		5,350		—		—		5,350

Total	$	7,329	$	771	$	1,208	$	5,350

The fair values of Company-owned life insurance (“COLI”) and COLI deferred compensation assets are based on quotes for like instruments with similar credit ratings and terms. The fair values of other deferred compensation assets and liabilities are based on quoted prices in active markets, with the exception of the fixed general account, which is based on quotes for like instruments with similar credit ratings and terms. The fair values of interest rate derivatives are based on quoted market prices from various banks for similar instruments. The fair value of the acquisition related contingent consideration is based on unobservable inputs and is classified as Level 3. Significant inputs and assumptions are management’s estimate of the probability of the earnout ultimately being met/paid and the discount rate used to present value the liability.

Changes in the fair value of the Level 3 liability during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows:

	Contingent
	Consideration
Balance at December 31, 2010		$	5,350
Interest accretion			388
Balance at June 30, 2011		$	5,738

Note 5 – Hedging Activities

The Company is exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates, foreign currency fluctuations, changes in commodity prices and credit risk. The Company does not use derivative instruments to mitigate the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations, changes in commodity prices or credit risk. Quaker uses interest rate swaps to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates. The swaps convert a portion of the Company’s variable interest rate debt to fixed interest rate debt and are designated as cash flow hedges and reported on the balance sheet at fair value. The effective portions of the hedges are reported in Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”) until reclassified to earnings during the same period the hedged item affects earnings. The Company has no derivatives designated as fair value hedges and only has derivatives designated as hedging instruments under the FASB’s guidance. The notional amount of the Company’s interest rate swaps was $15,000 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Information about the Company’s interest rate derivatives is as follows (in thousands of dollars):

		Fair Value
		June 30,			December 31,
	Balance Sheet Location	2011			2010
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Other non-current liabilities			759			1,026
			$	759		$	1,026

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Cash Flow Hedges
Interest Rate Swaps

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)			$	78			$	191			$	174			$	296

Amount and Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into
Income (Effective Portion)	Interest Expense		$	(165	)		$	(454	)		$	(328	)		$	(908	)

Amount and Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
(Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Other Income		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—

Note 6 – Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognized approximately $1,854 of share-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The compensation expense was comprised of $228 related to stock options, $671 related to nonvested stock awards, $23 related to the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan, $902 related to the Company’s non elective 401(k) matching contribution and a portion of its elective 401(k) matching contribution in stock, and $30 related to the Company’s Director Stock Ownership Plan.

Based on historical experience, the Company has assumed a forfeiture rate of 13% on the nonvested stock. The Company will record additional expense if the actual forfeiture rate is lower than estimated, and will record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeiture is higher than estimated.

The Company has a long-term incentive program (“LTIP”) for key employees which provides for the granting of options to purchase stock at prices not less than market value on the date of the grant. Most options become exercisable between one and three years after the date of the grant for a period of time determined by the Company not to exceed seven years from the date of grant. Common stock awards issued under the LTIP program are subject only to time vesting over a three to five-year period. In addition, as part of the Company’s Global Annual Incentive Plan (“GAIP”), nonvested shares may be issued to key employees, which generally vest over a two to five-year period.

Stock option activity under all plans is as follows:

				Weighted
				Average
		Weighted Average		Remaining
	Number of	Exercise Price per		Contractual
	Shares	Share		Term (years)
Balance at December 31, 2010	303,444	$	14.19
Options granted	36,835		37.37
Options exercised	(10,163)		15.40
Options forfeited	(11,018)		13.67
Balance at June 30, 2011	319,098	$	16.85	4.5
Exercisable at June 30, 2011	163,995	$	14.48	3.6

As of June 30, 2011, the total intrinsic value of options outstanding was approximately $8,204, and the total intrinsic value of exercisable options was $4,605. Intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the current market price of the underlying security and the strike price of a related option.

A summary of the Company’s outstanding stock options at June 30, 2011 is as follows:

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

						Weighted	Weighted		Number	Weighted
					Number	Average	Average		Exercisable	Average
Range of					Outstanding	Contractual	Exercise		at	Exercise
Exercise Prices					at 6/30/2011	Life	Price		6/30/2011	Price
$	3.74	-	$	7.47	125,155	4.6	$	6.93	74,595	$	6.93
$	7.48	-	$	18.69	—	—		—	—		—
$	18.70	-	$	22.42	119,264	5.2		18.92	51,556		19.04
$	22.43	-	$	26.16	37,844	0.3		23.13	37,844		23.13
$	26.17	-	$	33.63	—	—		—	—		—
$	33.64	-	$	37.37	36,835	6.7		37.37	—		—
					319,098	4.5		16.85	163,995		14.48

As of June 30, 2011, unrecognized compensation expense related to options granted during 2009 was $71, for options granted during 2010 was $341 and for options granted in 2011 was $444.

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company granted 36,835 stock options under the Company’s LTIP plan that are subject only to time vesting over a three-year period. For the purposes of determining the fair value of stock option awards, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the assumptions set forth in the table below:

	2011
Dividend Yield	5.00	%
Expected Volatility	62.13	%
Risk-free interest rate	1.99	%
Expected term (years)	5.0
Expected forfeiture rate	3.00	%

Approximately $55 of expense was recorded on these options during the first six months of 2011. The fair value of these awards is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the awards.

Nonvested shares granted under the Company’s LTIP plans are shown below:

		Weighted
		Average Grant
	Number of	Date Fair Value
	Shares	(per share)
Nonvested awards, December 31, 2010	163,076	$	14.89
Granted	42,850	$	39.29
Vested	(39,412)	$	21.86
Forfeited	(9,151)	$	11.65
Nonvested awards, June 30, 2011	157,363	$	19.97

The fair value of the nonvested stock is based on the trading price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company adjusts the grant date fair value for expected forfeitures based on historical experience for similar awards. As of June 30, 2011, unrecognized compensation expense related to these awards was $1,892 to be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of 1.92 years.

Nonvested shares granted under the Company’s GAIP plan are shown below:

		Weighted
		Average Grant
	Number of	Date Fair Value
	Shares	(per share)
Nonvested awards, December 31, 2010	63,250	$	7.72
Granted	—	$	—
Vested	—	$	—
Forfeited	(500)	$	7.72
Nonvested awards, June 30, 2011	62,750	$	7.72

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

As of June 30, 2011, unrecognized compensation expense related to these awards was $121, to be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of 0.75 years.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In 2000, the Board adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) whereby employees may purchase Company stock through a payroll deduction plan. Purchases are made from the plan and credited to each participant’s account at the end of each month, the “Investment Date.” The purchase price of the stock is 85% of the fair market value on the Investment Date. The plan is compensatory and the 15% discount is expensed on the Investment Date. All employees, including officers, are eligible to participate in this plan. A participant may withdraw all uninvested payment balances credited to a participant’s account at any time by giving written notice to the Company. An employee whose stock ownership of the Company exceeds five percent of the outstanding common stock is not eligible to participate in this plan.

2003 Director Stock Ownership Plan

In March 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock ownership plan for each member of the Company’s Board to encourage the Directors to increase their investment in the Company. The Plan was effective on the date it was approved and remains in effect for a term of ten years or until it is earlier terminated by the Board. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued under the Plan is 75,000, subject to certain conditions that the Compensation/Management Development Committee (the “Committee”) may elect to adjust the number of shares. As of June 30, 2011, the Committee has not made any elections to adjust the shares under this plan. Each Director is eligible to receive an annual retainer for services rendered as a member of the Board of Directors. Currently, each Director who owns less than 7,500 shares of Company Common Stock is required to receive 75% of the annual retainer in Common Stock and 25% of the annual retainer in cash. Each Director who owns 7,500 or more shares of Company Common Stock may elect to receive payment of a percentage (up to 100%) of the annual retainer in shares of common stock. Currently, the annual retainer is $40. The number of shares issued in payment of the fees is calculated based on an amount equal to the average of the closing prices per share of Common Stock as reported on the composite tape of the New York Stock Exchange for the two trading days immediately preceding the retainer payment date. The retainer payment date is June 1.

Note 7 – Earnings Per Share

The Company applies FASB’s guidance regarding the calculation of earnings per share using the two-class method. The Company includes nonvested stock awards with rights to non-forfeitable dividends as part of its basic weighted average share calculation.

The following table summarizes earnings per share (EPS) calculations:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Basic Earnings per Common Share
Net income attributable to Quaker Chemical Corporation	$	9,841		$	9,153		$	20,441		$	18,572
Less: income allocated to participating securities		(182	)		(196	)		(384	)		(399	)
Net income available to common shareholders	$	9,659		$	8,957		$	20,057		$	18,173
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		12,043,858			10,973,547			11,668,657			10,926,647
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.80		$	0.82		$	1.72		$	1.66

Diluted Earnings per Common Share
Net income attributable to Quaker Chemical Corporation	$	9,841		$	9,153		$	20,441		$	18,572
Less: income allocated to participating securities		(180	)		(194	)		(380	)		(394	)
Net income available to common shareholders	$	9,661		$	8,959		$	20,061		$	18,178
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		12,043,858			10,973,547			11,668,657			10,926,647
Effect of dilutive securities, common shares outstanding		174,919			203,417			175,905			158,314
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		12,218,777			11,176,964			11,844,562			11,084,961
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.79		$	0.80		$	1.69		$	1.64

The following number of stock options are not included in diluted earnings per share since the effect would have been anti-dilutive: 8,209 and 0 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and 10,208 and 7,300 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 8 – Business Segments

The Company organizes its segments by type of product sold. The Company’s reportable segments are as follows:

(1) Metalworking process chemicals – industrial process fluids for various heavy industrial and manufacturing applications.

(2) Coatings – temporary and permanent coatings for metal and concrete products and chemical milling maskants.

(3) Other chemical products – other various chemical products.

Segment data includes direct segment costs as well as general operating costs.

The table below presents information about the reported segments:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Metalworking Process Chemicals
Net sales	$	156,772		$	126,962		$	307,505		$	248,167
Operating income for reportable segments		26,149			25,117			53,084			50,636
Coatings
Net sales		10,487			8,510			18,969			15,274
Operating income for reportable segments		2,446			1,918			4,409			3,326
Other Chemical Products
Net sales		533			519			1,183			870
Operating income (loss) for reportable segments		4			23			39			(34	)
Total
Net sales		167,792			135,991			327,657			264,311
Operating income for reportable segments		28,599			27,058			57,532			53,928
Non-operating expenses		(13,171	)		(13,437	)		(27,518	)		(26,382	)
Amortization		(487	)		(208	)		(973	)		(462	)
Interest expense		(1,200	)		(1,386	)		(2,418	)		(2,697	)
Interest income		271			343			543			527
Other income, net		791			1,123			1,330			1,886
Consolidated income before taxes and equity in net income of associated companies	$	14,803		$	13,493		$	28,496		$	26,800

Operating income comprises revenue less related costs and expenses. Non-operating items primarily consist of general corporate expenses identified as not being a cost of operation, interest expense, interest income, and license fees from non-consolidated affiliates.

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 9 – Equity, Noncontrolling Interest and Comprehensive Income

The following table presents the changes in equity, noncontrolling interest and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

								Accumulated
			Capital in					Other
	Common		Excess of		Retained			Comprehensive			Noncontrolling			Comprehensive
	Stock		Par Value		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Interest			Income			Total
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	11,531	$	39,132	$	152,237		$	(9,497	)	$	7,359					$	200,762
Net income		—		—		9,841						714		$	10,555
Currency translation adjustments		—		—		—			3,587			69			3,656
Defined benefit retirement plans		—		—		—			325			—			325
Current period changes in fair value of derivatives		—		—		—			78			—			78
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities		—		—		—			—			—			—
Comprehensive income															14,614			14,614
Comprehensive loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest															(783	)
Comprehensive income attributable to
Quaker Chemical Corporation														$	13,831
Dividends ($0.235 per share)		—		—		(3,080	)		—			—						(3,080	)
Stock offering, net of related expenses		1,265		46,878		—			—			—						48,143
Share issuance and equity-based compensation plans		27		1,155		—			—			—						1,182
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises		—		84		—			—			—						84
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	12,823	$	87,249	$	158,998		$	(5,507	)	$	8,142					$	261,705

Balance at March 31, 2010	$	11,152	$	30,277	$	129,994		$	(14,058	)	$	5,750					$	163,115
Net income		—		—		9,153						581		$	9,734
Currency translation adjustments		—		—		—			(6,458	)		(268	)		(6,726	)
Defined benefit retirement plans		—		—		—			269			—			269
Current period changes in fair value of derivatives		—		—		—			191			—			191
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities		—		—		—			(14	)		—			(14	)
Comprehensive income															3,454			3,454
Comprehensive loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest															(313	)
Comprehensive income attributable to
Quaker Chemical Corporation														$	3,141
Dividends ($0.235 per share)		—		—		(2,650	)		—			—						(2,650	)
Share issuance and equity-based compensation plans		107		2,357		—			—			—						2,464
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises		—		164		—			—			—						164
Balance at June 30, 2010	$	11,259	$	32,798	$	136,497		$	(20,070	)	$	6,063					$	166,547

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

								Accumulated
			Capital in					Other
	Common		Excess of		Retained			Comprehensive			Noncontrolling			Comprehensive
	Stock		Par Value		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Interest			Income			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	11,492	$	38,275	$	144,347		$	(13,736	)	$	6,721					$	187,099
Net income		—		—		20,441			—			1,344		$	21,785
Currency translation adjustments		—		—		—			7,400			77			7,477
Defined benefit retirement plans		—		—		—			649			—			649
Current period changes in fair value of derivatives		—		—		—			174			—			174
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities		—		—		—			6			—			6
Comprehensive income															30,091			30,091
Comprehensive loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest															(1,421	)
Comprehensive income attributable to
Quaker Chemical Corporation														$	28,670
Dividends ($0.47 per share)		—		—		(5,790	)		—			—						(5,790	)
Stock offering, net of related expenses		1,265		46,878		—			—			—						48,143
Share issuance and equity-based compensation plans		66		1,934		—			—			—						2,000
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises		—		162		—			—			—						162
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	12,823	$	87,249	$	158,998		$	(5,507	)	$	8,142					$	261,705

Balance at December 31, 2009	$	11,086	$	27,527	$	123,140		$	(10,439	)	$	4,981					$	156,295
Net income		—		—		18,572						1,199		$	19,771
Currency translation adjustments		—		—		—			(10,456	)		(117	)		(10,573	)
Defined benefit retirement plans		—		—		—			538			—			538
Current period changes in fair value of derivatives		—		—		—			296			—			296
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities		—		—		—			(9	)		—			(9	)
Comprehensive income															10,023			10,023
Comprehensive loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest															(1,082	)
Comprehensive income attributable to
Quaker Chemical Corporation														$	8,941
Dividends ($0.465 per share)		—		—		(5,215	)		—			—						(5,215	)
Share issuance and equity-based compensation plans		173		3,153		—			—			—						3,326
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises		—		2,118		—			—			—						2,118
Balance at June 30, 2010	$	11,259	$	32,798	$	136,497		$	(20,070	)	$	6,063					$	166,547

During the first half of 2011, the Company recorded $162 of excess tax benefits in capital in excess of par value on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, related to stock option exercises. During the first half of 2010, the Company recorded $2,118 of these benefits. Prior to the first quarter of 2010, the Company’s actual taxable income in affected jurisdictions was not sufficient to recognize these benefits, while the Company’s full-year 2010 taxable income was sufficient to recognize these benefits. As a result, the Company recognized $162 and $1,236 of these benefits as a cash inflow from financing activities in its Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows which represents the Company’s estimate of cash savings through June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company sold 1,265,000 shares of its common stock during the second quarter of 2011. The Company received proceeds of $48,143, net of related offering expenses, commissions and underwriting fees. The Company used the proceeds to repay a portion of its revolving credit line during the second quarter of 2011.

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 10 – Business Acquisitions

In July 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of D.A. Stuart’s U.S. aluminum hot rolling oil business from Houghton International for $6,793. This acquisition strategically strengthens the Company’s position in the non-ferrous industry, as the acquired product portfolio is complementary to its existing business. The Company allocated $2,351 to intangible assets, comprised of customer lists, to be amortized over 15 years; trade names, to be amortized over 10 years; and a trademark, to be amortized over one year. In addition, the Company recorded $3,133 of goodwill, all of which will be tax-deductible, and was assigned to the metalworking process chemicals segment.

In December 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of Summit Lubricants, Inc. for approximately $29,116, subject to certain post closing adjustments. The Company paid an additional $717 in the second quarter of 2011 to complete post closing adjustments. Summit Lubricants manufactures and distributes specialty greases and lubricants and is complementary to the Company’s existing business. The Company allocated $17,100 to intangible assets, comprised of formulations, to be amortized over 15 years; customer lists, to be amortized over 20 years; a non-competition agreement, to be amortized over 5 years; and a trademark, which was assigned an indefinite life. In addition, the Company recorded $3,804 of goodwill, all of which will be tax deductible, and was assigned to the metalworking process chemicals segment. Liabilities assumed include an earnout to be paid to the former shareholders if certain earnings targets are met by the end of 2013.

The following table shows the allocation of the purchase price of the assets and liabilities acquired as of June 30, 2011. The pro forma results of operations have not been provided because the effects were not material:

	D.A.		Summit
	Stuart		Lubricants			Total
Current assets	$	1,176	$	6,198		$	7,374
Fixed assets		133		9,430			9,563
Intangibles		2,351		17,100			19,451
Goodwill		3,133		3,804			6,937
Total assets		6,793		36,532			43,325
Current liabilities		—		(1,349	)		(1,349	)
Earnout		—		(5,350	)		(5,350	)
Total liabilities assumed		—		(6,699	)		(6,699	)
Cash paid	$	6,793	$	29,833		$	36,626

Subsequent to June 30, 2011, the Company acquired the remaining 60% ownership interest in its Mexican equity affiliate for approximately $10,500 in cash, with an additional $2,000 payable in the third quarter of 2012, subject to certain conditions. The acquisition strengthens the Company’s position in the growing Mexican market. In connection with the acquisition, the Company expects to record a one-time gain in the third quarter of 2011.

Note 11 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are as follows. The Company has recorded no impairment charges in the past:

	Metalworking
	Process
	Chemicals			Coatings			Total
Balance as of December 31, 2010		$	44,677		$	8,081		$	52,758
Goodwill additions			717			—			717
Currency translation adjustments			1,807			—			1,807
Balance as of June 30, 2011		$	47,201		$	8,081		$	55,282

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization for definite-lived intangible assets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

	Gross Carrying				Accumulated
	Amount				Amortization
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Amortized intangible assets
Customer lists and rights to sell	$	24,563	$	24,379	$	5,777	$	4,974
Trademarks and patents		2,035		2,035		1,813		1,800
Formulations and product technology		5,278		5,278		2,899		2,708
Other		4,009		4,004		3,369		3,284
Total	$	35,885	$	35,696	$	13,858	$	12,766

The Company recorded $973 and $462 of amortization expense in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Estimated annual aggregate amortization expense for the current year and subsequent five years is as follows:

For the year ended December 31, 2011	$	1,942
For the year ended December 31, 2012	$	1,843
For the year ended December 31, 2013	$	1,662
For the year ended December 31, 2014	$	1,426
For the year ended December 31, 2015	$	1,426
For the year ended December 31, 2016	$	1,253

The Company has two indefinite-lived intangible assets totaling $1,100 for trademarks recorded in connection with the Company’s 2002 acquisition of Epmar and its 2010 acquisition of Summit Lubricants.

Note 12 – Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30, are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
								Other												Other
								Postretirement												Postretirement
	Pension Benefits							Benefits					Pension Benefits							Benefits
		2011			2010				2011		2010			2011			2010				2011		2010
Service cost		$	593		$	480			$	5	$	5		$	1,164		$	991			$	10	$	9
Interest cost and other			1,555			1,482				89		98			3,077			3,012				178		197
Expected return on plan assets			(1,449	)		(1,344	)			—		—			(2,873	)		(2,728	)			—		—
Other amortization, net			461			402				31		13			921			804				62		26
Net periodic benefit cost		$	1,160		$	1,020			$	125	$	116		$	2,289		$	2,079			$	250	$	232

Employer Contributions:

The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, that it expected to make minimum cash contributions of $8,397 to its pension plans and $823 to its other postretirement benefit plan in 2011. As of June 30, 2011, $6,455 and $414 of contributions have been made, respectively.

Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies

In April of 1992, the Company identified certain soil and groundwater contamination at AC Products, Inc. (“ACP”), a wholly owned subsidiary. In voluntary coordination with the Santa Ana California Regional Water Quality Board, ACP has been remediating the contamination, the principal contaminant of which is perchloroethylene (“PERC”). On or about December 18, 2004, the Orange County Water District (“OCWD”) filed a civil complaint in Superior Court in Orange County, California against ACP and other parties potentially responsible for groundwater contamination. OCWD was seeking to recover compensatory and other damages

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

related to the investigation and remediation of the contamination in the groundwater. Effective October 17, 2007, ACP and OCWD settled all claims related to this litigation. Pursuant to the settlement agreement with OCWD, ACP agreed to pay $2,000. In addition to the $2,000 payment, ACP agreed to operate the two existing groundwater treatment systems associated with its extraction wells P-2 and P-3 so as to hydraulically contain groundwater contamination emanating from ACP’s site until such time as the concentrations of PERC are below the current Federal maximum contaminant level for four consecutive quarterly sampling events. As of June 30, 2011 the Company believes that the range of potential-known liabilities associated with ACP contamination including the water and soil remediation program is approximately $1,200 to $2,200, for which the Company has sufficient reserves.

The low and high ends of the range are based on the length of operation of the two extraction wells as determined by groundwater modeling with planned higher maintenance costs in later years if a longer treatment period is required. Costs of operation include the operation and maintenance of the extraction wells, groundwater monitoring and program management. The duration of the well operation was estimated based on historical trends in concentrations in the monitoring wells within the proximity of the applicable extraction wells. Also factored into the model was the impact of water injected into the underground aquifer from a planned recharge basin adjacent to ACP. Based on the modeling, it is estimated that P-2 will operate for another three to five years and P-3 will operate for one and one-half years to up to two years. Operation and maintenance costs were based on historical expenditures and estimated inflation. As mentioned above, a significantly higher maintenance expense was factored into the range if the system operates for the longer period. Also included in the reserve are anticipated expenditures to operate an on-site soil vapor extraction system.

The Company believes, although there can be no assurance regarding the outcome of other unrelated environmental matters, that it has made adequate accruals for costs associated with other environmental problems of which it is aware. Approximately $438 and $374 were accrued at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, to provide for such anticipated future environmental assessments and remediation costs.

An inactive subsidiary of the Company that was acquired in 1978 sold certain products containing asbestos, primarily on an installed basis, and is among the defendants in numerous lawsuits alleging injury due to exposure to asbestos. The subsidiary discontinued operations in 1991 and has no remaining assets other than the proceeds from insurance settlements received. To date, the overwhelming majority of these claims have been disposed of without payment and there have been no adverse judgments against the subsidiary. Based on a continued analysis of the existing and anticipated future claims against this subsidiary, it is currently projected that the subsidiary’s total liability over the next 50 years for these claims is approximately $7,700 (excluding costs of defense). Although the Company has also been named as a defendant in certain of these cases, no claims have been actively pursued against the Company, and the Company has not contributed to the defense or settlement of any of these cases pursued against the subsidiary. These cases were handled by the subsidiary’s primary and excess insurers who had agreed in 1997 to pay all defense costs and be responsible for all damages assessed against the subsidiary arising out of existing and future asbestos claims up to the aggregate limits of the policies. A significant portion of this primary insurance coverage was provided by an insurer that is now insolvent, and the other primary insurers have asserted that the aggregate limits of their policies have been exhausted. The subsidiary challenged the applicability of these limits to the claims being brought against the subsidiary. In response, two of the three carriers entered into separate settlement and release agreements with the subsidiary in late 2005 and in the first quarter of 2007 for $15,000 and $20,000, respectively. The payments under the latest settlement and release agreement were structured to be received over a four-year period with annual installments of $5,000, the final installment of which was received in the first quarter of 2010. The proceeds of both settlements are restricted and can only be used to pay claims and costs of defense associated with the subsidiary’s asbestos litigation. During the third quarter of 2007, the subsidiary and the remaining primary insurance carrier entered into a Claim Handling and Funding Agreement, under which the carrier will pay 27% of defense and indemnity costs incurred by or on behalf of the subsidiary in connection with asbestos bodily injury claims for a minimum of five years beginning July 1, 2007. At the end of the term of the agreement, the subsidiary may choose to again pursue its claim against this insurer regarding the application of the policy limits. The Company also believes that, if the coverage issues under the primary policies with the remaining carrier are resolved adversely to the subsidiary and all settlement proceeds are used, the subsidiary may have limited additional coverage from a state guarantee fund established following the insolvency of one of the subsidiary’s primary insurers. Nevertheless, liabilities in respect of claims may exceed the assets and coverage available to the subsidiary.

If the subsidiary’s assets and insurance coverage were to be exhausted, claimants of the subsidiary may actively pursue claims against the Company because of the parent-subsidiary relationship. Although asbestos litigation is particularly difficult to predict, especially with respect to claims that are currently not being actively pursued against the Company, the Company does not believe that such claims would have merit or that the Company would be held to have liability for any unsatisfied obligations of the subsidiary as a result of such claims. After evaluating the nature of the claims filed against the subsidiary and the small number of such claims that have resulted in any payment, the potential availability of additional insurance coverage at the subsidiary level, the additional availability of the Company’s own insurance and the Company’s strong defenses to claims that it should be held responsible for the subsidiary’s obligations because of the parent-subsidiary relationship, the Company believes it is not probable that the Company will incur any material losses. All of the active asbestos cases against the Company challenging the parent-subsidiary relationship are in

Table of Contents

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

the early stages of litigation. The Company has been successful in the past having claims naming it dismissed during initial proceedings. Since the Company may be in this early stage of litigation for some time, it is not possible to estimate additional losses or range of loss, if any.

As initially disclosed in the Company’s second quarter 2010 Form 10-Q, one of the Company’s subsidiaries may have paid certain value-added-taxes (“VAT”) incorrectly and, in certain cases, may not have collected sufficient VAT from certain customers. The VAT rules and regulations at issue are complex, vary among the jurisdictions and can be contradictory, in particular as to how they relate to the subsidiary’s products and to sales between jurisdictions.

Since its inception, the subsidiary had been consistent in its VAT collection and remittance practices and had never been contacted by any tax authority relative to VAT. Now the subsidiary has determined that for certain products, a portion of the VAT was incorrectly paid and that the total VAT due exceeds the amount originally collected and remitted by the subsidiary. In 2010, three jurisdictions contacted the subsidiary. In two jurisdictions, the subsidiary has either participated in an amnesty program or entered into a settlement whereby it paid a reduced portion of the amounts owed in resolution of those jurisdictions’ claims. In April 2011, the subsidiary received a notice requesting payment of VAT from the third jurisdiction. The subsidiary has modified its VAT invoicing and payment procedures to eliminate or mitigate future exposure.

In analyzing the subsidiary’s exposure, it is difficult to estimate both the probability and the amount of any potential liabilities due to a number of factors, including: the decrease in exposure over time due to applicable statutes of limitations and actions taken by the subsidiary, the joint liability of customers and suppliers for a portion of the VAT, the availability of a VAT refund for VAT incorrectly paid through an administrative process, any amounts which may have been or will be paid by customers, as well as the timing and structure of any tax amnesties or settlements. In addition, interest and penalties on any VAT due can be a multiple of the base tax. The subsidiary may contest any tax assessment administratively and/or judicially for an extended period of time, but may ultimately resolve its disputes through participation in tax amnesty programs, which are a common practice for settling tax disputes in the jurisdictions in question and which have historically occurred on a regular basis, resulting in significant reductions of interest and penalties. Also, the timing of payments and refunds of VAT may not be contemporaneous, and, if additional VAT is owed, it may not be fully recoverable from customers. As a result, this matter has the potential to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, liquidity and capital resources and the results of operations.

In 2010, the Company recorded a net charge of $4,132, which consisted of a net $3,901 charge related to two tax dispute settlements entered into by the subsidiary, as well as a net $231 charge representing management’s best estimate based on the information available to it, including the factors noted above, of the amount that ultimately may be paid related to the other jurisdiction that has made inquiries. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $697 and $1,560, respectively, accrued for remaining payments to be made under tax dispute settlements entered into by the subsidiary. The change in the accrual from December 31, 2010 reflects year-to-date payments made in accordance with the Company’s tax dispute settlements. In addition, the Company had $245 accrued at December 31, 2010 and $306 accrued at June 30, 2011, related to the other jurisdiction that has made inquiries.

The charges taken by the Company in 2010 assume a successful recovery of the VAT incorrectly paid, as well as reductions in interest and penalties from anticipated future amnesty programs or settlements. On a similar basis, if all other potentially impacted jurisdictions were to initiate audits and issue assessments, the remaining exposure, net of refunds, could be from $0 to $26,000 with one jurisdiction representing approximately 84 percent of this additional exposure, assuming the continued availability of future amnesty programs or settlements to reduce the interest and penalties. If there are future assessments but no such future amnesty programs or settlements, the potential exposure could be higher.

The Company is party to other litigation which management currently believes will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Table of Contents

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Executive Summary

Quaker Chemical Corporation is a leading global provider of process chemicals, chemical specialties, services, and technical expertise to a wide range of industries—including steel, aluminum, automotive, mining, aerospace, tube and pipe, coatings and construction materials. Our products, technical solutions, and chemical management services (“CMS”) enhance our customers’ processes, improve their product quality, and lower their costs.

The Company’s revenue growth in the second quarter of 2011 was primarily driven by acquisitions, selling price increases implemented across the globe to help offset higher raw material costs, as well as foreign exchange rate translation. The increased pace of the escalation in raw material prices has exceeded pricing actions taken, resulting in a decreased gross margin. The Company is implementing further price increases in an effort to restore margins to historically acceptable levels. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased approximately $3.7 million primarily due to increased business activity, acquisition-related activity, foreign exchange rate translation, as well as investments in key growth initiatives.

During the second quarter of 2011 the Company completed an equity offering of approximately 1.3 million shares, raising approximately $48.1 million of net cash proceeds, which were used to repay a portion of its revolving credit line. The second quarter 2011 earnings per diluted share of $0.79 reflects an approximate $0.04 dilutive effect as a result of this equity offering. In July 2011, the Company purchased the remaining ownership interest in its Mexican equity affiliate. Cash consideration of $10.5 million was paid for the 60% interest not previously owned by the Company, with an additional $2.0 million payable in July 2012, subject to certain conditions. As part of the acquisition, the Company will record a one-time gain in the third quarter of 2011, representing a revaluation of its existing ownership interest in this affiliate.

In the second half of 2011, management sees some potential demand uncertainty in markets such as China, India, and Brazil as their governments try to manage inflation. However, over the next several years, the Company still believes these markets will have strong growth especially for its key steel and automotive markets, and the Company is continuing to invest in additional resources in these areas. Despite the uncertainties in the raw material markets and global economies, managements’ overall view for 2011 is unchanged as the Company expects to build upon the profitability achieved in 2010. In addition, the Company’s recent stock offering has increased its financial flexibility to take advantage of growth opportunities, such as the recent acquisition of the remaining ownership interest in its Mexican affiliate. With the Company’s leadership positions in both the emerging and mature markets, combined with both organic and external growth opportunities, management remains confident in the Company’s prospects for 2011 and beyond.

CMS Discussion

The Company currently has more than 40 CMS contracts in North America, as well as additional CMS contracts in other areas of the world. Under its traditional CMS approach, the Company effectively acts as an agent, and the revenues and costs from these sales are reported on a net sales or “pass-through” basis. Under certain of its CMS contracts, the contracts are structured differently in that the Company’s revenue received from the customer is a fee for products and services provided to the customer, which are indirectly related to the actual costs incurred. Profit is dependent on how well the Company controls product costs and achieves product conversions from other third-party suppliers’ products to its own products. As a result, under the alternative structure, the Company recognizes in reported revenue the gross revenue received from the CMS site customer, and in cost of goods sold the third-party product purchases, which substantially offset each other until the Company achieves significant product conversions, which may result in a decrease in reported gross margin as a percentage of sales.

In 2009, the Company had a mix of contracts with both the traditional product pass-through structure and fixed price contracts covering all services and products. As a result of the global economic downturn and its impact in the automotive sector, during 2009 and early 2010, the Company experienced a shift in customer requirements and business circumstances where almost all CMS contracts have reverted to the traditional product pass-through structure. However, the Company’s offerings will continue to include both approaches to CMS.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Quaker’s cash and cash equivalents decreased to $23.5 million at June 30, 2011 from $25.8 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease of $2.3 million resulted from $0.2 million of cash provided by operating activities, $6.3 million of cash used in investing activities, $2.6 million of cash provided by financing activities and a $1.2 million increase from the effect of exchange rates on cash.

Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $0.2 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $10.3 million provided

Table of Contents

by operating activities in the first half of 2010. The Company’s increase in net income was more than offset by increased business activity resulting in an increased investment in working capital as well as higher pension plan contributions compared to the first half of 2010.

Net cash flows used in investing activities were $6.3 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $0.3 million used in investing activities in the first quarter of 2010. Increased investments in the Company’s Ohio, New York and China plants, as well as the Company’s global ERP system, were the primary drivers of the increased investments in property, plant and equipment. In addition, the receipt of the final payment in the first quarter of 2010 from the Company’s insurance settlement (discussed below) and decreases in the Company’s construction fund related to the Company’s expansion of its Middletown, Ohio manufacturing facility in the prior year, also affected the investing cash flow comparisons.

In the first quarter of 2007, an inactive subsidiary of the Company reached a settlement agreement and release with one of its insurance carriers for $20.0 million. The proceeds of the settlement are restricted and can only be used to pay claims and costs of defense associated with this subsidiary’s asbestos litigation. The payments were structured to be received over a four-year period with annual installments of $5.0 million, the final installment of which was received in the first quarter of 2010. During the third quarter of 2007, the same inactive subsidiary and one of its insurance carriers entered into a Claim Handling and Funding Agreement, under which the carrier will pay 27% of the defense and indemnity costs incurred by or on behalf of the subsidiary in connection with asbestos bodily injury claims for a minimum of five years beginning July 1, 2007.

Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $2.6 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $3.6 million used in financing activities in the first half of 2010. The Company’s second quarter 2011 offering of approximately 1.3 million shares of its common stock resulted in net cash proceeds of approximately $48.1 million, which was used to repay a portion of the Company’s revolving credit line. During the first half of 2011, the Company recorded $0.2 million of excess tax benefits in capital in excess of par on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, and as a cash flow from financing activities in its Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, related to stock option exercises. During the first half of 2010, the Company recorded approximately $2.1 million of these benefits on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and recognized $1.2 million as a cash inflow from financing activities in its Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, related to stock option exercises which occurred over prior years. Prior to 2010, the Company’s actual taxable income in affected jurisdictions was not sufficient to recognize these benefits, while the Company’s 2010 taxable income was sufficient to recognize the benefits. Higher stock option exercise activity in the prior year also affected the financing cash flow comparisons.

The Company’s primary credit line is a $175.0 million syndicated multicurrency credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A. (administrative agent) and certain other major financial institutions, which expires in 2014. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $15.0 million and $55.0 million outstanding, respectively. The Company’s access to this credit is largely dependent on its consolidated leverage ratio covenant, which cannot exceed 3.50 to 1, and at June 30, 2011, the consolidated leverage ratio was below 1.0 to 1. The Company has entered into interest rate swaps with a combined notional value of $15.0 million as of June 30, 2011, in order to fix the interest rate on that amount of its variable rate debt. Outstanding financial derivative instruments may expose the Company to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the agreements. To manage credit risk, the Company limits its exposure to any single counterparty. However, the Company does not expect any of the counterparties to fail to meet their obligations.

At June 30, 2011, the Company’s gross liability for uncertain tax positions, including accrued interest and penalties, was $14.6 million. The Company cannot determine a reliable estimate of the timing of cash flows by period related to its uncertain tax position liability. However, should the entire liability be paid, the amount of the payment may be reduced by up to $8.1 million as a result of offsetting benefits in other tax jurisdictions.

The Company believes it is capable of supporting its operating requirements, including pension plan contributions, payments of dividends to shareholders, possible acquisitions and business opportunities, capital expenditures and possible resolution of contingencies, through internally generated funds supplemented with debt or equity as needed.

Operations

Comparison of the Second Quarter of 2011 with the Second Quarter of 2010

Net sales for the second quarter of 2011 were $167.8 million, an increase of 23% from the second quarter of 2010. Product volumes were higher by approximately 5%, primarily due to acquisitions. Selling prices and mix increased revenues by approximately 11%, as the Company continues to implement price increases across the globe to help offset higher raw material costs. Foreign exchange rates also increased revenues by approximately 7%.

Gross profit increased by approximately $5.2 million, or 11%, from the second quarter of 2010, but gross margin decreased from 35.7% in the second quarter of 2010 to 32.0% in the second quarter of 2011. The pace of raw material price increases continued

Table of Contents

to rapidly escalate from the first quarter of 2011. The Company continues to implement price increases to help restore margins.

SG&A increased approximately $3.7 million compared to the second quarter of 2010. Higher selling costs on increased business activity, acquisition related activity and foreign exchange rate translation accounted for the majority of the increase. In addition, higher inflationary and other costs were offset by lower incentive compensation. SG&A as a percentage of sales decreased to 23.1% in the second quarter of 2011 from 25.8% in the second quarter of 2010.

Other income decreased in the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to larger foreign exchange gains in the second quarter of 2010. Net interest expense decreased primarily due to lower average borrowings as a result of the use of the net cash proceeds from the Company’s second quarter equity offering to repay a portion of the Company’s revolving credit line.

The second quarter effective tax rate was 30.4%, compared to 30.7% in the second quarter of 2010. Many external and internal factors can impact this rate and the Company will continue to refine this rate, if necessary, as the year progresses. Please refer to the Comparison of the First Six Months of 2011 with the First Six Months of 2010, for further discussion.

Segment Reviews—Comparison of the Second Quarter of 2011 with the Second Quarter of 2010

Metalworking Process Chemicals

Metalworking Process Chemicals consists of industrial process fluids for various heavy industrial and manufacturing applications and represented approximately 93% of the Company’s net sales in the second quarter of 2011. Net sales were up $29.8 million, or 23%. Foreign exchange translation positively impacted net sales by approximately 7%, primarily driven by the E.U. Euro and Brazilian Real to U.S. Dollar exchange rates. The average U.S. Dollar to E.U. Euro exchange rate was 1.44 in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 1.27 in the second quarter of 2010. The U.S. Dollar to Brazilian Real exchange rate was 0.63 in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 0.56 in the second quarter of 2010. Net sales were positively impacted by increases of 15% in North America (excluding acquisitions), 10% in Europe and 14% in Asia/Pacific, slightly offset by a 1% decrease in South America, all on a constant currency basis. The Company’s 2010 acquisition activity accounted for approximately 6% of the increased sales in this segment. The remaining increase in this segment’s sales was primarily due to increased selling prices and changes in mix across the globe. The Company continues to implement price increases to help offset higher raw material costs. This segment’s operating income increased $1.0 million, with the sales price increases noted above and the Company’s 2010 acquisitions, which were partially offset by higher raw material costs and higher SG&A costs as the Company is investing in additional resources to support its growth initiatives.

Coatings

The Company’s coatings segment, which represented approximately 6% of the Company’s net sales in the second quarter of 2011, contains products that provide temporary and permanent coatings for metal and concrete products and chemical milling maskants. Net sales for this segment were higher by $2.0 million, or 23%, due to increased sales in chemical milling maskants sold to the aerospace industry. This segment’s operating income increased by $0.5 million, consistent with the volume increases noted above.

Other Chemical Products

Other Chemical Products, which represented less than 1% of the Company’s net sales in the second quarter of 2011, consists of sulfur removal products for industrial gas streams sold by the Company’s Q2 Technologies joint venture. Net sales were consistent with the prior year period and operating income was slightly lower than the second quarter of 2010.

Comparison of the First Six Months of 2011 with the First Six Months of 2010

Net sales for the first half of 2011 were $327.7 million, an increase of 24% from $264.3 million in the first half of 2010. Product volumes were higher by approximately 11%, including the effects of acquisitions. Selling prices and mix increased revenues by approximately 9%, as the Company continues to implement price increases to help offset higher raw material costs. Foreign exchange rates also increased revenues by approximately 4%.

Gross profit increased by approximately $10.6 million, or 11%, from the first half of 2010, but gross margin decreased from 36.3% in the first half of 2010 to 32.5% in the first half of 2011, as raw material costs have continued to escalate. The Company continues to implement price increases to help restore margins.

SG&A increased approximately $8.7 million compared to the first half of 2010. Higher selling costs on increased business activity, acquisition related activity and foreign exchange rate translation accounted for approximately 64% of the increase. Higher inflationary and other costs partially offset by lower incentive compensation accounted for the remainder of the increase. SG&A as a percentage of sales decreased to 23.6% in the first half of 2011 from 26.0% in the first half of 2010.

Table of Contents

Net interest expense decreased due to lower interest rates and lower average borrowings. Other income decreased due to higher foreign exchange gains in the first half of 2010. Equity in net income of associated companies increased compared to the first half of 2010 as the prior year reflected a charge of approximately $0.03 per diluted share related to the first quarter 2010 devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar Fuerte.

The Company’s first half 2011 tax rate of 25.7% was lower than the 2010 first half effective tax rate of 27.3% due to the higher utilization of previously unbenefited foreign tax credits. Each period reflects the derecognition of uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations for certain tax years of approximately $0.11 per diluted share. The Company has experienced and expects to further experience volatility in its quarterly effective tax rates due to the varying timing of tax audits and the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations as they relate to uncertain tax positions. At the end of 2010, the Company had net U.S. deferred tax assets totaling $14.8 million, excluding deferred tax assets related to additional minimum pension liabilities. The Company records valuation allowances when necessary to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The Company considers future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. However, in the event the Company were to determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be a non-cash charge to income in the period such determination was made, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company continues to closely monitor the factors affecting its net deferred tax assets and the assessment of valuation allowances.

Segment Reviews—Comparison of the First Six Months of 2011 with the First Six Months of 2010

Metalworking Process Chemicals

Metalworking Process Chemicals consists of industrial process fluids for various heavy industrial and manufacturing applications and represented approximately 94% of the Company’s net sales in the first half of 2011. Net sales increased $59.3 million, or 24%, compared to the first half of 2010. Foreign currency translation positively impacted net sales by approximately 5%, primarily driven by the E.U. Euro and Brazilian Real to U.S. Dollar exchange rates. The average U.S. Dollar to E.U. Euro exchange rate was 1.40 in the first half of 2011 compared to 1.33 in the first half of 2010, and the average U.S. Dollar to Brazilian Real exchange rate was 0.61 in the first half of 2011 compared to 0.56 in the first half of 2010. Net sales were positively impacted by increases of 14% in North America (excluding acquisitions), 15% in Europe, 18% in Asia/Pacific and 5% in South America, all on a constant currency basis. The Company’s 2010 acquisition activity accounted for 6% of the increased sales in this segment. The remainder of the increase in this segment’s sales was due to both volume and selling price increases and mix changes. The Company continues to implement price increases to help offset higher raw material costs. This segment’s operating income increased $2.4 million, with the volume and sales price increases noted above and the Company’s 2010 acquisitions, which were partially offset by higher raw material costs and higher SG&A costs as the Company is investing in additional resources to support its growth initiatives.

Coatings

The Company’s coatings segment, which represented approximately 6% of the Company’s net sales in the first half of 2011, contains products that provide temporary and permanent coatings for metal and concrete products and chemical milling maskants. Net sales for this segment were higher by $3.7 million, or 24%, due to increased sales in both chemical milling maskants sold to the aerospace industry and certain coatings product lines. This segment’s operating income increased by $1.1 million, consistent with the volume increases noted above.

Other Chemical Products

Other Chemical Products, which represented less than 1% of the Company’s net sales in the first half of 2011, consists of sulfur removal products for industrial gas streams sold by the Company’s Q2 Technologies joint venture. Net sales increased approximately $0.3 million due to increased activity in the oil and gas market. Operating income was slightly above break-even, compared to a slight loss in the first half of 2010.

Factors That May Affect Our Future Results

(Cautionary Statements Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995)

Certain information included in this report and other materials filed or to be filed by Quaker with the SEC (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us) contain or may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations about future events. These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, intentions, financial condition,

Table of Contents

results of operations, future performance and business, including:

statements relating to our business strategy;

our current and future results and plans; and

statements that include the words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan” or similar expressions.

Such statements include information relating to current and future business activities, operational matters, capital spending, and financing sources. From time to time, forward-looking statements are also included in Quaker’s other periodic reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, as well as in press releases and other materials released to, or statements made to, the public.

Any or all of the forward-looking statements in this report and in any other public statements we make may turn out to be wrong. This can occur as a result of inaccurate assumptions or as a consequence of known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many factors discussed in this report will be important in determining our future performance. Consequently, actual results may differ materially from those that might be anticipated from our forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, any further disclosures made on related subjects in Quaker’s subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K should be consulted. Our forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us and our operations that are subject to change based on various important factors, some of which are beyond our control. A major risk is that the demand for the Company’s products and services is largely derived from the demand for its customers’ products, which subjects the Company to uncertainties related to downturns in a customer’s business and unanticipated customer production shutdowns. Other major risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, significant increases in raw material costs, worldwide economic and political conditions, foreign currency fluctuations, and terrorist attacks such as those that occurred on September 11, 2001. Furthermore, the Company is subject to the same business cycles as those experienced by steel, automobile, aircraft, appliance, and durable goods manufacturers. These risks, uncertainties, and possible inaccurate assumptions relevant to our business could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. Other factors beyond those discussed could also adversely affect us. Therefore, we caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. This discussion is provided as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Table of Contents

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We have evaluated the information required under this item that was disclosed in Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and we believe there has been no material change to that information.

Table of Contents

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period cover by this report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. As required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes to our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, except as described below, no changes to our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company added an additional location to the Company’s global ERP system. In connection with this implementation, the Company modified various procedures, including but not limited to, business processes such as user access security, data conversion, standardization and automation of system reporting and authorizations and reconciliations. The Company monitored and continues to monitor these changes as they relate to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

Items 1, 1A, 3, 4 and 5 of Part II are inapplicable and have been omitted.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The following table sets forth information concerning shares of the Company’s common stock acquired by the Company during the period covered by this report, all of which were acquired from employees in payment of the exercise price of employee stock options exercised, or for the payment of taxes upon the vesting of restricted stock, during the period.

					(c)		(d)
					Total Number of		Maximum
					Shares Purchased as		Number of Shares that
	(a)		(b)		Part of		May Yet
	Total Number		Average		Publicly Announced		Be Purchased Under the
	of Shares		Price Paid		Plans		Plans or
Period	Purchased (1)		Per Share (2)		or Programs (3)		Programs (3)
April 1 - April 30		—	$	—		—		252,600
May 1 - May 31		—	$	—		—		252,600
June 1 - June 30		573	$	40.91		—		252,600

Total		573	$	40.91		—		252,600

(1)	All of the 573 shares acquired by the Company during the period covered by this report were acquired from employees upon their surrender of previously owned shares in payment of taxes upon vesting of restricted stock.

(2)	The price per share represented the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of vesting, as specified by the plan pursuant to which the restricted stock was granted.

(3)

On February 15, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a share repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of Quaker common stock, and, on January 26, 2005, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 225,000 shares. Under the 1995 action of the Board, 27,600 shares may yet be purchased. Under the 2005 action of the Board, none of the shares authorized have been purchased and, accordingly, all of those shares may yet be purchased. Neither of the share repurchase authorizations has an expiration date.

Table of Contents

Item 6.

Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

10.1	–	Employment Agreement by and between Dieter Laininger and Quaker Chemical B.V., a subsidiary of the registrant, dated June 1, 2011, effective June 15, 2011. *
10.2	–	Change in Control Agreement by and between Registrant and Dieter Laininger dated May 31, 2011, effective June 15, 2011.*
31.1	–	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2	–	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32.1	–	Certification of Michael F. Barry Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350
32.2	–	Certification of Mark A. Featherstone Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350
101.INS **	–	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH **	–	XBRL Extension Schema Document
101.CAL **	–	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF **	–	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB **	–	XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE **	–	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

*	This exhibit is a management contract or compensation plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit.

**	Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections.

*********

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


				QUAKER CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Registrant)

				/s/ Mark A. Featherstone
Date: July 27, 2011				Mark A. Featherstone, officer duly authorized to sign this report, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer