e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-51357
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
52-2084569
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1600
Dallas, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
75201
(Zip Code) |
(214) 880-3500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o *Registrant is not subject to the requirements of Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T at this time
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the issuers common stock, par value $0.01, outstanding as of
April 26, 2011 was 96,768,427.
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC.
Index to Form 10-Q
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (unaudited) |
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, |
|
|
|
except per share amounts) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
162,829 |
|
|
$ |
161,373 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
131,396 |
|
|
|
131,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
31,433 |
|
|
|
29,431 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
46,723 |
|
|
|
49,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(15,290 |
) |
|
|
(20,019 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
11,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(21,165 |
) |
|
|
(31,344 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(21,148 |
) |
|
|
(31,200 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations (net of income tax benefit of $0 in 2011 and 2010) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,249 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
94,904 |
|
|
|
81,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, |
|
|
|
except per share amounts) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
77,615 |
|
|
$ |
103,234 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $2,364 and $2,444 at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
68,804 |
|
|
|
55,631 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
72,759 |
|
|
|
63,810 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
7,837 |
|
|
|
8,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
229,924 |
|
|
|
235,349 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
53,960 |
|
|
|
57,068 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
111,193 |
|
|
|
111,193 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
8,857 |
|
|
|
9,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
403,934 |
|
|
$ |
412,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
55,193 |
|
|
$ |
44,866 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
26,869 |
|
|
|
26,284 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
|
5,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
87,361 |
|
|
|
76,451 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
|
163,791 |
|
|
|
163,801 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
13,098 |
|
|
|
13,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
264,250 |
|
|
|
253,299 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued and
outstanding at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000 shares authorized; 96,768 and 96,769 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
356,243 |
|
|
|
355,194 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(215,730 |
) |
|
|
(194,481 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,778 |
) |
|
|
(2,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
139,684 |
|
|
|
159,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
403,934 |
|
|
$ |
412,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,249 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,386 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,685 |
|
|
|
3,768 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
4,491 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
Net non-cash income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
Net gain on sales of assets |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(12,169 |
) |
|
|
(10,677 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(8,949 |
) |
|
|
(15,362 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
10,327 |
|
|
|
18,023 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
3,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(25,330 |
) |
|
|
(26,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
(1,858 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(1,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of long-term debt and other loans |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(105,152 |
) |
Proceeds from rights offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,107 |
|
Payment of recapitalization costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,574 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
69,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(25,619 |
) |
|
|
40,719 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
103,234 |
|
|
|
84,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
77,615 |
|
|
$ |
124,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
Builders FirstSource, Inc., a Delaware corporation formed in 1998, is a leading supplier and
manufacturer of structural and related building products for residential new construction in the
United States. In this quarterly report, references to the company, we, our, ours or us
refer to Builders FirstSource, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated or
the context otherwise requires.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements include all recurring adjustments and normal accruals necessary for a fair statement of
the companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the dates and periods
presented. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
during the remainder of the current year or for any future period. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 is derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. This condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2010 and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
included herein should be read in conjunction with the more detailed audited consolidated financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 included in our most recent annual report on Form
10-K. Accounting policies used in the preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements are consistent with the accounting policies described in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K.
2. Net Loss per Common Share
Net loss per common share (EPS) is calculated in accordance with the Earnings per Share
topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification), which requires the
presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of potential common
shares.
Our restricted stock shares include rights to receive dividends that are not subject to the
risk of forfeiture even if the underlying restricted stock shares on which the dividends were paid
do not vest. In accordance with the Earnings per Share topic of the Codification, unvested
share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are deemed
participating securities and should be considered in the calculation of basic EPS. Since the
restricted stock shares do not include an obligation to share in losses, they will be included in
our basic EPS calculation in periods of net income and excluded from our basic EPS calculation in
periods of net loss. Accordingly, there were 1.9 million and 1.8 million restricted stock shares
excluded from the computations of basic EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, because we generated a net loss. For the purpose of computing diluted EPS, options to
purchase 5.9 million and 6.2 million shares of common stock were not included in the computations
of diluted EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, because their
effect was anti-dilutive.
6
3. Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
Floating rate notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 notes |
|
|
5,249 |
|
|
|
5,249 |
|
2016 notes |
|
|
139,718 |
|
|
|
139,718 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,090 |
|
|
|
169,102 |
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
|
5,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
$ |
163,791 |
|
|
$ |
163,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 21, 2010, we completed a common stock rights offering and debt exchange for our
Second Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2012 (2012 notes). As part of these
transactions, we raised $180.1 million of new equity capital through the issuance of 51,459,184
shares of common stock in the rights offering at a subscription price of $3.50 per share. Holders
of the 2012 notes exchanged, at par, $269.8 million aggregate principal amount of 2012 notes for
(i) $139.7 million aggregate principal amount of Second Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
due 2016 (2016 notes), (ii) $105.1 million in cash from the proceeds of the rights offering, and
(iii) 7,112,244 shares of our common stock. We used a portion of the remaining $75.0 million of
proceeds to pay the expenses of the rights offering and the debt exchange and the remainder was
used for general corporate purposes. In the first quarter of 2010 in connection with these
transactions, we expensed $1.6 million of unamortized debt issue costs related to the long-term
debt repaid and $2.5 million of various third-party fees and expenses.
We have a $150 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the 2007 Agreement) with a
consortium of banks. Our borrowing base consists of trade accounts receivable, inventory and fixed
assets, which meet specific criteria contained within the 2007 Agreement, minus agent specified
reserves. Our net available borrowing capacity in excess of the minimum liquidity requirement at
March 31, 2011 was $37.8 million. At March 31, 2011, the minimum liquidity requirement, which is
determined on a sliding scale based on our ninety-day average gross availability, was $16.25
million. The 2007 Agreement has certain restrictive covenants, which, among other things, relate to
the payment of dividends, incurrence of indebtedness, and asset sales. We were not in violation of
any of these covenants as of March 31, 2011. The 2007 Agreement also has a fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1:1 that is triggered if our available borrowing capacity, as determined under the
borrowing base formula, is less than a minimum liquidity requirement. The calculation allows cash
on deposit with the agent to be included as eligible borrowing base. The fixed charge coverage
ratio is defined as the ratio of earnings before interest expenses, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization expenses minus capital expenditures, cash taxes paid, dividends, distributions and
share repurchases or redemptions to the sum of scheduled principal payments and interest expense on
a trailing twelve month basis from the trigger date. Based on our 2011 forecast, we will not meet
the fixed charge coverage ratio, but we anticipate that we will not fall below the minimum
liquidity covenant in 2011 including the use of cash on deposit with the agent; therefore, we will
not trigger the fixed charge coverage ratio requirement.
We currently have two interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts of $100 million and
$50 million. The swap agreements expire on May 15, 2011. We entered into these interest rate swaps
in order to mitigate a portion of the interest rate risk that we were exposed to in the normal
course of business on our floating rate notes.
The table below presents the effect of our interest rate swap derivatives on the condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
Derivatives Not Designated |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income* |
as Hedging Instruments |
|
Location of Loss Recognized in Income |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
(386 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,606 |
) |
When our interest rate swap agreements are in a net asset position, we are exposed to credit
losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties. The amount of such credit exposure is
limited to the unrealized gains on our swaps. We have not experienced any credit loss as a result
of counterparty nonperformance in the past. To manage credit risks, we generally select
counterparties who are part of our banking syndicate and settle on a net basis. We perform a
quarterly assessment of our counterparty credit risk, including a
7
review of credit ratings, credit default swap rates, and potential nonperformance of the
counterparty. Since the counterparty is part of the bank syndicate, we also would have the ability
to net amounts owed to us against any outstanding borrowings under the 2007 Agreement, thereby
reducing the credit risk.
When interest rate swap agreements are in a net liability position, we are required to
establish a reserve against our borrowing base equal to 110% of the fair value of the interest rate
swaps on the last day of the month. This reserve effectively reduces our available borrowing
capacity under the 2007 Agreement. At March 31, 2011, the reserve for the swaps is $1.2 million.
The swaps are also collateralized in a manner similar to the loans under the 2007 Agreement. In the
event of default, or if we or the counterparty fail to be part of the 2007 Agreement, an early
termination event would be triggered which could require us to settle the swaps on the termination
date at the then fair market value.
Our interest rate swaps are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. We do not trade in
swaps or hold them for speculative purposes, therefore, the retail market that exists for swaps
would be the most advantageous market for our interest rate swaps. As such, we use the market
approach to value our interest rate swaps by obtaining a quote from the counterparty that is based
on a discounted cash flow analysis which incorporates information obtained from third-party market
sources and is adjusted for company specific credit risk. We validate the fair value quote
obtained from the counterparty by using an independent, third-party discounted cash flow analysis
which also utilizes market information. These discounted cash flow techniques incorporate Level 1
and Level 2 inputs. In addition to the term and notional amount inputs, the valuation also factors
in discount rate, forward yield curves, and credit risk. Significant inputs to the derivative
valuation for interest rate swaps are observable in the active markets and are classified as Level
2 in the hierarchy.
The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about our financial instruments
measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant other observable inputs (Level 2) (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
Measurement as of |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
Measurement as of |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Interest rate swaps (included in Total liabilities)
|
|
$ |
1,091 |
|
|
$ |
1,091 |
|
|
$ |
2,209 |
|
|
$ |
2,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Comprehensive Loss
The following table presents the components of comprehensive loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,249 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,386 |
) |
Other comprehensive income
changes related to interest rate
swap agreements, net of related tax
effect |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(20,870 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Income Taxes
In accordance with the Income Taxes topic of the Codification, we evaluate our deferred tax
assets quarterly to determine if a valuation allowance is required. The Income Taxes topic requires
that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration
of all available evidence. We recorded additional valuation allowance of $8.1 million and $11.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to the net
deferred tax assets generated by our loss from continuing operations.
To the extent we generate sufficient taxable income in the future to fully utilize the tax
benefits of the net deferred tax assets on which a valuation allowance is recorded, our effective
tax rate may decrease as the valuation allowance is reversed. However, to the extent we generate
future operating losses, we would be required to increase the valuation allowance on our net
deferred tax assets and our income tax expense will be adversely affected.
8
6. Commitments and Contingencies
We are a party to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Although the
ultimate disposition of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes
the outcome of any claim that is pending or threatened, either individually or on a combined basis,
will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or
results of operations. However, there can be no assurances that future costs would not be material
to our results of operations or liquidity for a particular period.
7. Segment and Product Information
We have three regional operating segments Atlantic, Southeast and Central with
centralized financial and operational oversight. We believe that these operating segments meet the
aggregation criteria prescribed in the Segment Reporting topic of the Codification, and thus have
one reportable segment.
Sales by product category for the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Prefabricated components |
|
$ |
30,783 |
|
|
$ |
31,970 |
|
Windows & doors |
|
|
38,265 |
|
|
|
36,937 |
|
Lumber & lumber sheet goods |
|
|
48,110 |
|
|
|
44,388 |
|
Millwork |
|
|
17,691 |
|
|
|
17,778 |
|
Other building products & services |
|
|
27,980 |
|
|
|
30,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
162,829 |
|
|
$ |
161,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance under the Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements
topic of the Codification which requires separation of the consideration received in such
arrangements by establishing a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a
deliverable, which will be based on available information in the following order: vendor-specific
objective evidence, third-party evidence, or estimated selling price. It also eliminates the
residual method of allocation, requires that the consideration be allocated at the inception of the
arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any
discount in the arrangement to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling price,
and requires that a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is
consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis.
These changes became effective for us on January 1, 2011, but did not have a material impact on
our financial position or results of operations.
9
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read
in conjunction with the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in our most
recent annual report on Form 10-K. The following discussion and analysis should also be read in
conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in
this report. In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, references to the company, we, our,
ours or us refer to Builders FirstSource, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless
otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires.
Cautionary Statement
Statements in this report which are not purely historical facts or which necessarily depend
upon future events, including statements regarding our anticipations, beliefs, expectations, hopes,
intentions or strategies for the future, may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All forward-looking statements in
this report are based upon information available to us on the date of this report. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. Any forward-looking statements made in this report involve
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from the
events or results described in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. In addition, oral statements made by our
directors, officers and employees to the investor and analyst communities, media representatives
and others, depending upon their nature, may also constitute forward-looking statements. As with
the forward-looking statements included in this report, these forward-looking statements are by
nature inherently uncertain, and actual results may differ materially as a result of many factors.
Further information regarding the risk factors that could affect our financial and other results
are included as Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
We are a leading supplier and manufacturer of structural and related building products for
residential new construction in the U.S. We offer an integrated solution to our customers providing
manufacturing, supply and installation of a full range of structural and related building products.
Our manufactured products include our factory-built roof and floor trusses, wall panels and stairs,
aluminum and vinyl windows, custom millwork and trim, as well as engineered wood that we design and
cut for each home. We also assemble interior and exterior doors into pre-hung units. Additionally,
we supply our customers with a broad offering of professional grade building products not
manufactured by us, such as dimensional lumber and lumber sheet goods, various window, door and
millwork lines, as well as cabinets, roofing and gypsum wallboard. Our full range of
construction-related services includes professional installation, turn-key framing and shell
construction, and spans all our product categories.
We group our building products into five product categories:
|
|
|
Prefabricated Components. Our prefabricated components consist of wood floor and roof
trusses, steel roof trusses, wall panels, stairs, and engineered wood. |
|
|
|
Windows & Doors. Our windows & doors category is comprised of the manufacturing,
assembly, and distribution of windows and the assembly and distribution of interior and
exterior door units. |
|
|
|
Lumber & Lumber Sheet Goods. Lumber & lumber sheet goods include dimensional lumber,
plywood, and OSB products used in on-site house framing. |
|
|
|
Millwork. Millwork includes interior trim, exterior trim, columns and posts that we
distribute, as well as custom exterior features that we manufacture under the Synboard brand
name. |
|
|
|
Other building products & services. Other building products & services are comprised of
products such as cabinets, gypsum, roofing and insulation and services such as turn-key
framing, shell construction, design assistance, and professional installation spanning all
of our product categories. |
Our operating results are dependent on the following trends, events and uncertainties, some of
which are beyond our control:
|
|
|
Homebuilding Industry. Our business is driven primarily by the residential new
construction market, which is in turn dependent upon a number of factors, including interest
rates, consumer confidence, foreclosure rates, and the health of the economy and
|
10
|
|
|
mortgage markets. Over the past few years, many homebuilders significantly decreased their
housing starts because of lower demand and an excess of home inventory. Due to the decline in
housing starts and increased competition for homebuilder business, we have and will continue to
experience significant pressure on our gross margins. Housing starts remain at historically
low levels but industry forecasters expect to see some improvement over the next few years. We
also still believe there are several meaningful trends that indicate U.S. housing demand will
likely recover in the long term and that the current downturn in the housing industry is likely
a trough in the cyclical nature of the residential construction industry. These trends include
relatively low interest rates, the aging of housing stock, and normal population growth due to
birthrate exceeding death rate. |
|
|
|
Targeting Large Production Homebuilders. Over the past 10 years, the homebuilding
industry has undergone significant consolidation, with the larger homebuilders substantially
increasing their market share. We expect that trend to continue due to the better liquidity
positions of the larger homebuilders relative to the smaller, less capitalized homebuilders.
Our focus is on maintaining relationships and market share with these customers while
balancing the competitive pressures we are facing in our markets with certain profitability
expectations. Our sales to the Builder 100, the countrys largest 100 production
homebuilders, decreased only 14.2% compared to the first quarter of 2010, while actual U.S.
single-family housing starts decreased 21.4% over that same time period. We expect that our
ability to maintain strong relationships with the largest builders will be vital to our
ability to grow and expand into new markets as well as maintain our current market share
through the downturn. Additionally, during this downturn, we have been successful in
expanding our custom homebuilder base while maintaining our credit standards. |
|
|
|
Expand into Multi-Family and Light Commercial Business. We continue to look for ways to
expand our multi-family and light commercial business to further diversify our customer base
and lessen our dependence on single-family residential new construction. |
|
|
|
Use of Prefabricated Components. Prior to the current housing downturn, homebuilders
were increasingly using prefabricated components in order to realize increased efficiency
and improved quality. Shortening cycle time from start to completion was a key imperative of
the homebuilders during periods of strong consumer demand. With the current housing
downturn, that trend decelerated as cycle time had less relevance. Customers who
traditionally used prefabricated components, for the most part, still do. However, the
conversion of customers to this product offering has slowed. We expect this trend to
continue at least for the duration of this downturn. In response, we have reduced our
manufacturing capacity and delayed plans to open new facilities. |
|
|
|
Economic Conditions. Economic changes both nationally and locally in our markets impact
our financial performance. The building products supply industry is highly dependent upon
new home construction and subject to cyclical market changes. Our operations are subject to
fluctuations arising from changes in supply and demand, national economic conditions, labor
costs, competition, government regulation, trade policies and other factors that affect the
homebuilding industry such as demographic trends, interest rates, single-family housing
starts, employment levels, consumer confidence, and the availability of credit to
homebuilders, contractors, and homeowners. During 2007, the mortgage markets experienced
substantial disruption due to increased defaults, primarily as a result of credit quality
deterioration. The disruption has continued and resulted in a stricter regulatory
environment and reduced availability of mortgages for potential homebuyers due to an
illiquid credit market and tighter standards to qualify for mortgages. Mortgage financing
and commercial credit for smaller homebuilders continue to be severely constrained. As the
housing industry is dependent upon the economy and employment levels as well as potential
homebuyers access to mortgage financing and homebuilders access to commercial credit, it
is likely that the housing industry will not recover until conditions in the economy and the
credit markets substantially improve and unemployment rates decline. |
|
|
|
Cost of Materials. Prices of wood products, which are subject to cyclical market
fluctuations, may adversely impact operating income when prices rapidly rise or fall within
a relatively short period of time. We purchase certain materials, including lumber products,
which are then sold to customers as well as used as direct production inputs for our
manufactured and prefabricated products. Short-term changes in the cost of these materials,
some of which are subject to significant fluctuations, are sometimes passed on to our
customers, but our pricing quotation periods may limit our ability to pass on such price
changes. We may also be limited in our ability to pass on increases on in-bound freight
costs on our products due to the price of fuel. Our inability to pass on material price
increases to our customers could adversely impact our operating results. |
|
|
|
Controlling Expenses. Another important aspect of our strategy is controlling costs and
enhancing our status as a low-cost building materials supplier in the markets we serve. We
pay close attention to managing our working capital and operating expenses. We have a best
practices operating philosophy, which encourages increasing efficiency, lowering costs,
improving working capital, and maximizing profitability and cash flow. We constantly analyze
our workforce productivity to achieve the
optimum, cost-efficient labor mix for our facilities. Further, we pay careful attention to our
logistics function and its effect on our shipping and handling costs.
|
11
CURRENT OPERATING CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK
Challenging conditions in the homebuilding industry continued, as the annualized rate for U.S.
single-family housing starts, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, at March 31, 2011 was 422,000,
down 21.1% from one year ago. For the quarter, actual U.S. single-family housing starts were
89,900, down 21.4% from last year. The housing industry continues to struggle due to the limited
availability of credit to smaller homebuilders and potential homebuyers, a slow economic recovery,
and high unemployment rates, among other factors. In fact, the National Association of Homebuilders
(NAHB) is now forecasting 471,200 U.S. single-family housing starts for 2011, which is
flat with 2010 actual starts.
Our sales in the current quarter were up 0.9% over the same period a year ago despite the
difficult housing environment and commodity prices for lumber and lumber sheet goods being, on
average, comparable to the first quarter of 2010. We have continued to experience the same
competitive pricing conditions that we have been faced with in recent years. However, our gross
margin increased 1.1 percentage points during the quarter compared to the prior year due to a
slight increase in sales volume along with a decrease of fixed costs in cost of goods sold. We have
continued to manage our operating expenses during this downturn with our key focus being to
conserve liquidity. During the quarter, our selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$2.7 million, or 5.5%, from the same period a year ago largely due to a reduction of our average
full-time equivalent headcount of approximately 7.0%. The continued execution of our cost
containment strategies along with our improved operating results contributed to us ending the
quarter with $115.4 million of total liquidity, which includes $77.6 million of cash and $37.8
million of net borrowing availability under our credit facility.
We still believe that the long-term outlook for the housing industry is positive due to growth
in the underlying demographics. At this point, it is unclear if housing activity has hit bottom,
but we believe our market leadership, financial resources and operating efficiencies afford us the
ability to manage through the downturn. We will continue to focus on working capital, maintain
our credit standards with our customers and also work with our vendors to improve our payment
terms and pricing on our products. We will also continue to work diligently to achieve the
appropriate balance of short-term cost reductions while maintaining the expertise to grow the
business when market conditions improve. We want to create long-term shareholder value and avoid
taking steps that will limit our ability to compete.
SEASONALITY AND OTHER FACTORS
Our first and fourth quarters have historically been, and are expected to continue to be,
adversely affected by weather patterns in some of our markets, causing reduced construction
activity. In addition, quarterly results historically have reflected, and are expected to continue
to reflect, fluctuations from period to period arising from the following:
|
|
|
The volatility of lumber prices; |
|
|
|
The cyclical nature of the homebuilding industry; |
|
|
|
General economic conditions in the markets in which we compete; |
|
|
|
The pricing policies of our competitors; |
|
|
|
The production schedules of our customers; and |
|
|
|
The effects of weather. |
The composition and level of working capital typically change during periods of increasing
sales as we carry more inventory and receivables. Working capital levels typically increase in the
second and third quarters of the year due to higher sales during the peak residential construction
season. These increases have in the past resulted in negative operating cash flows during this peak
season, which generally have been financed through available cash. Collection of receivables and
reduction in inventory levels following the peak building and construction season have in the past
helped to partially offset this negative cash flow. We have also from time to time utilized our
credit facility to cover working capital needs.
12
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the
percentage relationship to sales of certain costs, expenses and income items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
80.7 |
% |
|
|
81.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(9.4 |
)% |
|
|
(12.4 |
)% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(13.0 |
)% |
|
|
(19.3 |
)% |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(13.0 |
)% |
|
|
(19.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared with the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Sales. Sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $162.8 million, a 0.9% increase
from sales of $161.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Market prices for lumber
and lumber sheet goods in the quarter were, on average, comparable to the same period a year ago.
However, actual U.S. single-family housing starts decreased approximately 21% compared to the first
quarter of 2010. Despite the trend in housing starts, commodity sales increased by $3.7 million,
or 8.4%, quarter over quarter primarily due to an increase in pricing and to a lesser degree
volume. This increase was partially offset by a decline in sales of other building products and
services of approximately $2.3 million.
The following table shows sales classified by product category (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
% Change |
|
Prefabricated components |
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
$ |
32.0 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
Windows & doors |
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Lumber & lumber sheet goods |
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
Millwork |
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
Other building products & services |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
(7.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
162.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
161.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin. Gross margin increased $2.0 million to $31.4 million. Our gross margin
percentage increased from 18.2% in the first quarter of 2010 to 19.3% in the current quarter, a 1.1
percentage point increase. Our gross margin percentage increased primarily due to slightly
increased sales volume combined with a decrease of fixed costs in cost of goods sold.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased $2.7 million, or 5.5%. Average full-time equivalent employee headcount for the quarter
was 7.0% lower than the year ago quarter, and our salaries and benefits expense, excluding stock
compensation expense, decreased $1.6 million compared to a 0.9% increase in sales. Additionally,
our delivery expense decreased $0.8 million, or 8.3%.
As a percent of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 30.6% in
2010 to 28.7% in 2011. Salaries and benefits expense as a percentage of sales decreased 1.1% and
delivery costs decreased by 0.6%. We continue to monitor our operating cost structure closely and
make adjustments as necessary.
Interest Expense, net. Interest expense was $5.9 million in the first quarter of 2011, a
decrease of $5.4 million. Interest expense in the first quarter of 2010 included a write-off of
$1.6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to long-term debt repaid during the quarter
and $2.5 million of expense related to our rights offering and debt exchange. Interest expense
also decreased $0.8 million from the first quarter of 2010 due to a reduction in fair value
adjustments on our interest rate swaps.
13
Income Tax Benefit. We recorded no income tax benefit during the quarter compared to $0.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. We recorded an after-tax, non-cash valuation
allowance of $8.1 million and $11.6 million, in 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to our net
deferred tax assets. Excluding the effect of the valuation allowance, our tax benefit rate would
have been 38.4% and 37.6% in 2011 and 2010, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Availability under our $150 million senior secured revolving credit facility is determined by
a borrowing base. The following table shows our borrowing base, excess availability, borrowing
availability and fixed charge coverage ratio as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Accounts Receivable Availability |
|
$ |
57.8 |
|
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
Inventory Availability |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
Equipment Availability |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Availability |
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent Reserves |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing Base |
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Borrowings |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
Letters of Credit |
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Availability |
|
$ |
54.1 |
|
|
$ |
32.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Liquidity Requirement |
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
Borrowing Availability |
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio |
|
|
-1.73 x |
|
|
|
-2.06 x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio* |
|
|
1.00 x |
|
|
|
1.00 x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Required to be met only if excess availability falls below our minimum liquidity requirement. |
Our borrowing base consists of trade accounts receivable, inventory and fixed assets, which
meet specific criteria contained within the credit agreement, minus agent specified reserves. Our
borrowing base availability, net of the minimum liquidity requirement, at March 31, 2011 was $37.8
million. Excess availability is the sum of borrowing base plus qualified cash, defined as cash on
deposit with the agent subject to a control agreement, minus outstanding borrowings and letters of
credit. This amount must equal or exceed a specified minimum liquidity requirement at the monthly
reporting dates or we are required to meet a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1, which we
currently would not meet.
Further declines in our borrowing base, if any, could compel us to either repay outstanding
borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility or increase our cash on deposit with
the agent in order to meet the excess availability requirement. At March 31, 2011, we had $77.6
million of cash that can be used to either repay the $35.9 million currently funded under the
facility or support any shortfall in the net borrowing base availability. At March 31, 2011, we
were not in violation of any covenants or restrictions imposed by any of our debt agreements.
14
At March 31, 2011, our total liquidity of $115.4 million, which consisted of $77.6 million of
cash on hand and $37.8 million of net borrowing base availability, was slightly better than
anticipated. As a result, we still expect our cash usage for fiscal 2011 will be in the range of
$55-$65 million and to end the year with total liquidity of approximately $65-$70 million. We
believe our current liquidity is sufficient to meet our needs over the next twelve months. We do
not expect working capital or our credit facility to be a significant source of funds during this
time period.
On April 4, 2011, we announced our intent to (i) offer $250 million aggregate principal amount
of senior secured notes due 2019 and (ii) amend and extend our senior secured revolving credit
facility in conjunction with, and subject to the success of, the notes offering. Given our current
liquidity position of over $115 million, and given that our current revolving credit facility will
not expire until December 2012, this proposed financing transaction was opportunistic in nature.
The transaction terms being suggested by the market were not acceptable to us, and as a result, we
have decided not to move forward with this transaction.
Consolidated Cash Flows
Cash used in operating activities was $25.3 million and $26.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively. The decrease in cash used in operating
activities was primarily due to lower net operating losses partially offset by an increase in
working capital in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period a year ago.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, cash used in investing activities was
$0.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.3 million
decrease in capital expenditures related to buyouts of expiring vehicle and equipment leases in the
prior year.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were no cash financing activities compared to
cash provided by financing activities of $69.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The decrease was primarily due to the net proceeds received upon completion of our rights offering
and debt exchange in the first quarter of 2010.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance under the Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements
topic of the Codification which requires separation of the consideration received in such
arrangements by establishing a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a
deliverable, which will be based on available information in the following order: vendor-specific
objective evidence, third-party evidence, or estimated selling price. It also eliminates the
residual method of allocation, requires that the consideration be allocated at the inception of the
arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any
discount in the arrangement to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling price,
and requires that a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is
consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis.
These changes became effective for us on January 1, 2011, but did not have a material impact on
our financial position or results of operations.
15
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We experience changes in interest expense when market interest rates change. However, interest
expense accrues on our 2016 notes at a 3-month LIBOR (subject to a 3.0% floor) plus 10.0% and would
not change unless LIBOR increased to greater than 3.0%. Changes in our debt could also increase
these risks. Based on debt outstanding and LIBOR rates at March 31, 2011, a 1.0% increase in
interest rates would result in approximately $0.2 million of additional interest expense annually.
We purchase certain materials, including lumber products, which are then sold to customers as
well as used as direct production inputs for our manufactured products that we deliver. Short-term
changes in the cost of these materials and the related in-bound freight costs, some of which are
subject to significant fluctuations, are sometimes, but not always, passed on to our customers. Our
delayed ability to pass on material price increases to our customers can adversely impact our
operating results.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications. Our management, with the
participation of our principal executive officer (CEO) and principal financial officer (CFO),
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. The controls
evaluation was conducted by our Disclosure Committee, comprised of senior representatives from our
finance, accounting, internal audit, and legal departments under the supervision of our CEO and
CFO.
Certifications of our CEO and our CFO, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), are attached as exhibits to this
quarterly report. This Controls and Procedures section includes the information concerning the
controls evaluation referred to in the certifications, and it should be read in conjunction with
the certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. We do not expect that our disclosure controls
and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A system of controls and procedures, no
matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that
the objectives of the system are met. Because of the limitations in all such systems, no evaluation
can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been detected. Furthermore, the design of any system of controls and procedures is
based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions, regardless of how unlikely. Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective
system of controls and procedures, misstatements or omissions due to error or fraud may occur and
not be detected.
Scope of the Controls Evaluation. The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
included a review of their objectives and design, the Companys implementation of the controls and
procedures and the effect of the controls and procedures on the information generated for use in
this quarterly report. In the course of the evaluation, we sought to identify whether we had any
data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action,
including process improvements, were being undertaken if needed. This type of evaluation is
performed on a quarterly basis so that conclusions concerning the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures can be reported in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Many of the
components of our disclosure controls and procedures are also evaluated by our internal audit
department, our legal department and by personnel in our finance organization. The overall goals of
these various evaluation activities are to monitor our disclosure controls and procedures on an
ongoing basis, and to maintain them as dynamic systems that change as conditions warrant.
Conclusions regarding Disclosure Controls. Based on the required evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of March 31, 2011, we maintain
disclosure controls and procedures that are effective in providing reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the period covered by this
report, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation described above that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
16
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to the conduct of our business in
the ordinary course. We carry insurance coverage in such amounts in excess of our self-insured
retention as we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances and that may or may not cover any
or all of our liabilities in respect of claims and lawsuits. We do not believe that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial
position, cash flows or results of operations.
Although our business and facilities are subject to federal, state and local environmental
regulation, environmental regulation does not have a material impact on our operations. We believe
that our facilities are in material compliance with such laws and regulations. As owners and
lessees of real property, we can be held liable for the investigation or remediation of
contamination on such properties, in some circumstances without regard to whether we knew of or
were responsible for such contamination. Our current expenditures with respect to environmental
investigation and remediation at our facilities are minimal, although no assurance can be provided
that more significant remediation may not be required in the future as a result of spills or
releases of petroleum products or hazardous substances or the discovery of unknown environmental
conditions.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our annual report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing
our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
(a) None
Use of Proceeds
(b) Not applicable
Company Stock Repurchases
(c) The following table provides information with respect to our purchases of Builders
FirstSource, Inc. common stock during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Shares That May |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet be Purchased |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
January 1, 2011 January 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2011 February 28, 2011 |
|
|
860 |
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2011 March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
860 |
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shares presented in the above table represent restricted stock tendered in order to meet
minimum withholding tax requirements for shares vested.
17
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
(a) None
(b) None
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
(a) None
(b) None
18
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Registration
Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 6, 2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2007, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2010, among Builders
FirstSource, Inc., JLL Partners Fund V, L.P., and Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX,
L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on January 22, 2010, File Number
0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2005, among Builders FirstSource, Inc., the
Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of the
Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27,
2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 8, 2010, among Builders FirstSource, Inc.,
the Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on January 14, 2010, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Indenture, dated as of January 21, 2010, among Builders FirstSource, Inc., the
Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on January 22, 2010, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by M. Chad Crow as Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as Chief Executive
Officer and M. Chad Crow as Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Builders FirstSource, Inc. is furnishing, but not filing, the written
statement pursuant to Title 18 United States Code 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Floyd F. Sherman,
our Chief Executive Officer, and M. Chad Crow, our Chief Financial
Officer. |
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ FLOYD F. SHERMAN
|
|
|
Floyd F. Sherman |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
April 28, 2011 |
/s/ M. CHAD CROW
|
|
|
M. Chad Crow |
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
April 28, 2011 |
|
|
20
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Registration
Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 6, 2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2007, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2010, among Builders
FirstSource, Inc., JLL Partners Fund V, L.P., and Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX,
L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on January 22, 2010, File Number
0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2005, among Builders FirstSource, Inc., the
Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of the
Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27,
2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 8, 2010, among Builders FirstSource, Inc.,
the Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on January 14, 2010, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Indenture, dated as of January 21, 2010, among Builders FirstSource, Inc., the
Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on January 22, 2010, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by M. Chad Crow as Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as Chief Executive
Officer and M. Chad Crow as Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Builders FirstSource, Inc. is furnishing, but not filing, the written
statement pursuant to Title 18 United States Code 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Floyd F. Sherman,
our Chief Executive Officer, and M. Chad Crow, our Chief Financial
Officer. |
21