e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-51357
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
52-2084569 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1600 |
|
|
Dallas, Texas
|
|
75201 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(214) 880-3500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the issuers common stock, par value $0.01, outstanding as of
July 27, 2011 was 96,738,427.
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC.
Index to Form 10-Q
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
206,393 |
|
|
$ |
211,483 |
|
|
$ |
369,222 |
|
|
$ |
372,856 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
163,590 |
|
|
|
172,748 |
|
|
|
294,986 |
|
|
|
304,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
42,803 |
|
|
|
38,735 |
|
|
|
74,236 |
|
|
|
68,166 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
48,965 |
|
|
|
51,446 |
|
|
|
95,666 |
|
|
|
100,891 |
|
Facility closure costs |
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(8,044 |
) |
|
|
(12,715 |
) |
|
|
(23,334 |
) |
|
|
(32,734 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
5,665 |
|
|
|
6,531 |
|
|
|
11,540 |
|
|
|
17,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(13,709 |
) |
|
|
(19,246 |
) |
|
|
(34,874 |
) |
|
|
(50,590 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(15,375 |
) |
|
|
(18,920 |
) |
|
|
(36,523 |
) |
|
|
(50,120 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations (net of income tax benefit of $0 for the
three months and six months ended in 2011 and 2010, respectively) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(15,484 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,039 |
) |
|
$ |
(36,733 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
94,905 |
|
|
|
94,878 |
|
|
|
94,905 |
|
|
|
88,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, |
|
|
|
except per share amounts) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
63,103 |
|
|
$ |
103,234 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $2,274 and $2,444 at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
80,357 |
|
|
|
55,631 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
69,470 |
|
|
|
63,810 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
7,920 |
|
|
|
8,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
225,429 |
|
|
|
235,349 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
51,677 |
|
|
|
57,068 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
111,193 |
|
|
|
111,193 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
8,494 |
|
|
|
9,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
396,793 |
|
|
$ |
412,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
59,754 |
|
|
$ |
44,866 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
26,567 |
|
|
|
26,284 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
5,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
91,621 |
|
|
|
76,451 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
|
163,777 |
|
|
|
163,801 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
14,488 |
|
|
|
13,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
269,886 |
|
|
|
253,299 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued and
outstanding at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000 shares authorized; 96,738 and 96,769 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
357,172 |
|
|
|
355,194 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(231,214 |
) |
|
|
(194,481 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
126,907 |
|
|
|
159,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
396,793 |
|
|
$ |
412,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(36,733 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,425 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,205 |
|
|
|
7,816 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
4,773 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
(585 |
) |
Bad debt expense |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Net non-cash income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
Net gain on sales of assets |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(25,319 |
) |
|
|
16,534 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(5,660 |
) |
|
|
(18,336 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
(680 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
14,888 |
|
|
|
8,363 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
6,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(38,764 |
) |
|
|
(22,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
(6,615 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,340 |
) |
|
|
(6,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of long-term debt and other loans |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(105,163 |
) |
Proceeds from rights offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,107 |
|
Payment of recapitalization costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,631 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
69,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(40,131 |
) |
|
|
40,488 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
103,234 |
|
|
|
84,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
63,103 |
|
|
$ |
124,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
Builders FirstSource, Inc., a Delaware corporation formed in 1998, is a leading supplier and
manufacturer of structural and related building products for residential new construction in the
United States. In this quarterly report, references to the company, we, our, ours or us
refer to Builders FirstSource, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated or
the context otherwise requires.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements include all recurring adjustments and normal accruals necessary for a fair statement of
the companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the dates and periods
presented. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
during the remainder of the current year or for any future period. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 is derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. This condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2010 and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
included herein should be read in conjunction with the more detailed audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in our most recent annual report on Form
10-K. Accounting policies used in the preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements are consistent with the accounting policies described in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K.
2. Net Loss per Common Share
Net loss per common share (EPS) is calculated in accordance with the Earnings per Share
topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification), which requires the
presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of potential common
shares.
Our restricted stock shares include rights to receive dividends that are not subject to the
risk of forfeiture even if the underlying restricted stock shares on which the dividends were paid
do not vest. In accordance with the Earnings per Share topic of the Codification, unvested
share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are deemed
participating securities and should be considered in the calculation of basic EPS. Since the
restricted stock shares do not include an obligation to share in losses, they will be included in
our basic EPS calculation in periods of net income and excluded from our basic EPS calculation in
periods of net loss. Accordingly, there were 1.8 million restricted stock shares excluded from the
computations of basic EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 because we
generated a net loss. For the purpose of computing diluted EPS, options to purchase 5.8 million and
6.1 million shares of common stock were not included in the computations of diluted EPS for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, because their effect was
anti-dilutive.
6
3. Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
Floating rate notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 notes |
|
|
5,249 |
|
|
|
5,249 |
|
2016 notes |
|
|
139,718 |
|
|
|
139,718 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,110 |
|
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,077 |
|
|
|
169,102 |
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
5,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
$ |
163,777 |
|
|
$ |
163,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have a $150 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the 2007 Agreement) with a
consortium of banks. Our borrowing base consists of trade accounts receivable, inventory and fixed
assets, which meet specific criteria contained within the 2007 Agreement, minus agent specified
reserves. Our net available borrowing capacity in excess of the minimum liquidity requirement at
June 30, 2011 was $48.9 million. At June 30, 2011, the minimum liquidity requirement, which is
determined on a sliding scale based on our ninety-day average gross availability, was $16.25
million. The 2007 Agreement has certain restrictive covenants, which, among other things, relate to
the payment of dividends, incurrence of indebtedness, and asset sales. We were not in violation of
any of these covenants as of June 30, 2011. The 2007 Agreement also has a fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1:1 that is triggered if our available borrowing capacity, as determined under the
borrowing base formula, is less than a minimum liquidity requirement. The calculation allows cash
on deposit with the agent to be included in the eligible borrowing base. The fixed charge coverage
ratio is defined as the ratio of earnings before interest expenses, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization expenses minus capital expenditures, cash taxes paid, dividends, distributions and
share repurchases or redemptions to the sum of scheduled principal payments and interest expense on
a trailing twelve month basis from the trigger date. Based on our 2011 forecast, we will not meet
the fixed charge coverage ratio, but we anticipate that we will not fall below the minimum
liquidity covenant in 2011 including the use of cash on deposit with the agent; therefore, we will
not trigger the fixed charge coverage ratio requirement. Further declines in our borrowing base,
if any, could compel us to either repay outstanding borrowings under the senior secured revolving
credit facility or increase our cash on deposit with the agent in order to meet the minimum
liquidity requirement.
We had two interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts of $100 million and $50
million, which expired on May 15, 2011. We entered into these interest rate swaps in order to
mitigate a portion of the interest rate risk that we were exposed to in the normal course of
business on our floating rate notes.
The table below presents the effect of our interest rate swap derivatives on the condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
in Income* |
|
Not Designated as |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Hedging |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Instruments |
|
Location of Loss Recognized in Income |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
(1,779 |
) |
|
$ |
(665 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,165 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,271 |
) |
7
4. Comprehensive Loss
The following table presents the components of comprehensive loss for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(15,484 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,039 |
) |
|
$ |
(36,733 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,425 |
) |
Other comprehensive
income change
related to interest
rate swap agreements,
net of related tax
effect |
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(13,706 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,375 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Facility Closure Costs
During the second quarter of 2011, we closed a distribution facility in Georgia which had been
idled since 2008. This facility was closed due to the continued depressed market conditions, the
housing recovery taking longer than originally anticipated, our success in finding a subtenant to
partially offset our remaining future lease obligations, and our ability to adequately service our
customers from other existing locations in the market. In the second quarter of 2011, we
recognized $1.9 million in facility closure costs which are primarily related to the future minimum
lease obligations on this facility, net of estimated sub-rental lease income. The facility and
other exit cost reserves of $3.1 million at June 30, 2011, of which $2.4 million is recorded as
other long-term liabilities, are primarily related to future minimum lease obligations on vacated
facilities.
In situations where multiple facilities serve the same market we may temporarily close, or
idle, facilities with plans to reopen these facilities once demand returns to the market. Should
conditions in our markets worsen, or recovery take significantly longer than forecasted, we may
temporarily idle or permanently close additional facilities, at which time we may incur additional
facility closure costs or asset impairment charges. Future non-cash impairment charges would have
the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses in such period, but would not impact
our current outstanding debt obligations or compliance with covenants contained in the related debt
agreements.
6. Income Taxes
In accordance with the Income Taxes topic of the Codification, we evaluate our deferred tax
assets quarterly to determine if a valuation allowance is required. The Income Taxes topic requires
that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration
of all available evidence. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded
valuation allowances of $6.8 and $14.9 million against the net deferred tax assets generated from
the net losses during the periods related to our continuing operations. In connection with the
expiration of our interest rate swaps during 2011, we reclassified $1.3 million of valuation
allowance from accumulated other comprehensive loss to income tax expense for the six months ended
June 30, 2011. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a valuation
allowance of $7.1 and $18.7 million against the net deferred tax assets generated from the net
losses during the periods related to our continuing operations.
To the extent we generate sufficient taxable income in the future to fully utilize the tax
benefits of the net deferred tax assets on which a valuation allowance is recorded, our effective
tax rate may decrease as the valuation allowance is reversed. However, to the extent we generate
future operating losses, we would be required to increase the valuation allowance on our net
deferred tax assets and our income tax expense will be adversely affected.
7. Commitments and Contingencies
We are a party to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Although the
ultimate disposition of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes
the outcome of any claim that is pending or threatened, either individually or on a combined basis,
will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or
results of operations. However, there can be no assurances that future costs related to legal
proceedings would not be material to our results of operations or liquidity for a particular
period.
8
8. Segment and Product Information
We have three regional operating segments Atlantic, Southeast and Central with
centralized financial and operational oversight. We believe that these operating segments meet the
aggregation criteria prescribed in the Segment Reporting topic of the Codification, and thus have
one reportable segment.
Sales by product category for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Prefabricated components |
|
$ |
40,227 |
|
|
$ |
41,181 |
|
|
$ |
71,010 |
|
|
$ |
73,151 |
|
Windows & doors |
|
|
46,577 |
|
|
|
46,448 |
|
|
|
84,842 |
|
|
|
83,385 |
|
Lumber & lumber sheet goods |
|
|
60,739 |
|
|
|
66,199 |
|
|
|
108,849 |
|
|
|
110,587 |
|
Millwork |
|
|
21,552 |
|
|
|
21,797 |
|
|
|
39,243 |
|
|
|
39,575 |
|
Other building products & services |
|
|
37,298 |
|
|
|
35,858 |
|
|
|
65,278 |
|
|
|
66,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
206,393 |
|
|
$ |
211,483 |
|
|
$ |
369,222 |
|
|
$ |
372,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance under the Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements
topic of the Codification which requires separation of the consideration received in such
arrangements by establishing a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a
deliverable, which will be based on available information in the following order: vendor-specific
objective evidence, third-party evidence, or estimated selling price. It also eliminates the
residual method of allocation, requires that the consideration be allocated at the inception of the
arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any
discount in the arrangement to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling price,
and requires that a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is
consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis.
These changes became effective for us on January 1, 2011, but did not have a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
9
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read
in conjunction with the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in our most
recent annual report on Form 10-K. The following discussion and analysis should also be read in
conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in
this report. In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, references to the company, we, our,
ours or us refer to Builders FirstSource, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless
otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires.
Cautionary Statement
Statements in this report which are not purely historical facts or which necessarily depend
upon future events, including statements regarding our anticipations, beliefs, expectations, hopes,
intentions or strategies for the future, may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All forward-looking statements in
this report are based upon information available to us on the date of this report. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. Any forward-looking statements made in this report involve
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from the
events or results described in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. In addition, oral statements made by our
directors, officers and employees to the investor and analyst communities, media representatives
and others, depending upon their nature, may also constitute forward-looking statements. As with
the forward-looking statements included in this report, these forward-looking statements are by
nature inherently uncertain, and actual results may differ materially as a result of many factors.
Further information regarding the risk factors that could affect our financial and other results
are included as Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
We are a leading supplier and manufacturer of structural and related building products for
residential new construction in the U.S. We offer an integrated solution to our customers providing
manufacturing, supply and installation of a full range of structural and related building products.
Our manufactured products include our factory-built roof and floor trusses, wall panels and stairs,
aluminum and vinyl windows, custom millwork and trim, as well as engineered wood that we design and
cut for each home. We also assemble interior and exterior doors into pre-hung units. Additionally,
we supply our customers with a broad offering of professional grade building products not
manufactured by us, such as dimensional lumber and lumber sheet goods, various window, door and
millwork lines, as well as cabinets, roofing and gypsum wallboard. Our full range of
construction-related services includes professional installation, turn-key framing and shell
construction, and spans all our product categories.
We group our building products into five product categories:
|
|
|
Prefabricated Components. Our prefabricated components consist of wood floor and roof
trusses, steel roof trusses, wall panels, stairs, and engineered wood. |
|
|
|
|
Windows & Doors. Our windows & doors category is comprised of the manufacturing,
assembly, and distribution of windows and the assembly and distribution of interior and
exterior door units. |
|
|
|
|
Lumber & Lumber Sheet Goods. Lumber & lumber sheet goods include dimensional lumber,
plywood, and OSB products used in on-site house framing. |
|
|
|
|
Millwork. Millwork includes interior trim, exterior trim, columns and posts that we
distribute, as well as custom exterior features that we manufacture under the Synboard®
brand name. |
|
|
|
|
Other Building Products & Services. Other building products & services are comprised of
products such as cabinets, gypsum, roofing and insulation and services such as turn-key
framing, shell construction, design assistance, and professional installation spanning all
of our product categories. |
Our operating results are dependent on the following trends, events and uncertainties, some of
which are beyond our control:
|
|
|
Homebuilding Industry. Our business is driven primarily by the residential new
construction market, which is in turn dependent upon a number of factors, including interest
rates, consumer confidence, foreclosure rates, and the health of the
|
10
|
|
|
economy and mortgage markets. Over the past few years, many homebuilders significantly
decreased their housing starts because of lower demand and an excess of home inventory. Due to
the decline in housing starts and increased competition for homebuilder business, we have and
will continue to experience pressure on our gross margins. Housing starts remain at
historically low levels but industry forecasters expect to see some improvement over the next
few years. We also still believe there are several meaningful trends that indicate U.S. housing
demand will likely recover in the long term and that the current downturn in the housing
industry is likely a trough in the cyclical nature of the residential construction industry.
These trends include relatively low interest rates, the aging of housing stock, and population
growth due to immigration and birthrate exceeding death rate. |
|
|
|
|
Targeting Large Production Homebuilders. Over the past 10 years, the homebuilding
industry has undergone significant consolidation, with the larger homebuilders substantially
increasing their market share. We expect that trend to continue due to the better liquidity
and land positions of the larger homebuilders relative to the smaller, less capitalized
homebuilders. Our focus is on maintaining relationships and market share with these
customers while balancing the competitive pressures we are facing in our markets with
certain profitability expectations. We expect that our ability to maintain strong
relationships with the largest builders will be vital to our ability to grow and expand into
new markets as well as maintain our current market share through the downturn. Additionally,
during this downturn, we have been successful in expanding our custom homebuilder base while
maintaining our credit standards. |
|
|
|
|
Expand into Multi-Family and Light Commercial Business. We continue to look for ways to
expand our multi-family and light commercial business to further diversify our customer base
and lessen our dependence on single-family residential new construction. |
|
|
|
|
Use of Prefabricated Components. Prior to the current housing downturn, homebuilders
were increasingly using prefabricated components in order to realize increased efficiency
and improved quality. Shortening cycle time from start to completion was a key imperative of
the homebuilders during periods of strong consumer demand. With the current housing
downturn, that trend decelerated as cycle time had less relevance. Customers who
traditionally used prefabricated components, for the most part, still do. However, the
conversion of customers to this product offering has slowed. We expect this trend to
continue at least for the duration of this downturn. In response, we have reduced our
manufacturing capacity and delayed plans to open new facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Economic Conditions. Economic changes both nationally and locally in our markets impact
our financial performance. The building products supply industry is highly dependent upon
new home construction and subject to cyclical market changes. Our operations are subject to
fluctuations arising from changes in supply and demand, national economic conditions, labor
costs, competition, government regulation, trade policies and other factors that affect the
homebuilding industry such as demographic trends, interest rates, single-family housing
starts, employment levels, consumer confidence, and the availability of credit to
homebuilders, contractors, and homeowners. Over the past few years, the mortgage markets
have experienced substantial disruption due to increased defaults. This disruption resulted
in a stricter regulatory environment and reduced availability of mortgages for potential
homebuyers due to an illiquid credit market and tighter standards to qualify for mortgages.
Mortgage financing and commercial credit for smaller homebuilders continue to be severely
constrained. As the housing industry is dependent upon the economy and employment levels as
well as potential homebuyers access to mortgage financing and homebuilders access to
commercial credit, it is likely that the housing industry will not recover until conditions
in the economy and the credit markets improve and unemployment rates decline. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of Materials. Prices of wood products, which are subject to cyclical market
fluctuations, may adversely impact operating income when prices rapidly rise or fall within
a relatively short period of time. We purchase certain materials, including lumber products,
which are then sold to customers as well as used as direct production inputs for our
manufactured and prefabricated products. Short-term changes in the cost of these materials,
some of which are subject to significant fluctuations, are sometimes passed on to our
customers, but our pricing quotation periods may limit our ability to pass on such price
changes. We may also be limited in our ability to pass on increases on in-bound freight
costs on our products due to the price of fuel. Our inability to pass on material price
increases to our customers could adversely impact our operating results. |
|
|
|
|
Controlling Expenses. Another important aspect of our strategy is controlling costs and
enhancing our status as a low-cost building materials supplier in the markets we serve. We
pay close attention to managing our working capital and operating expenses. We have a best
practices operating philosophy, which encourages increasing efficiency, lowering costs,
improving working capital, and maximizing profitability and cash flow. We constantly analyze
our workforce productivity to achieve the optimum, cost-efficient labor mix for our
facilities. Further, we pay careful attention to our logistics function and its effect on
our shipping and handling costs. |
11
CURRENT OPERATING CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK
The homebuilding industry continues to face many challenges as the annualized rate for U.S.
single-family housing starts, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, at June 30, 2011 was 453,000,
which was essentially flat when compared to June 2010. For the quarter, however, actual U.S.
single-family housing starts were 123,600, down 13.1% from last year. Actual U.S. single-family
units under construction were also down 16.7% from the second quarter of 2010. The housing
industry continues to struggle due to the limited availability of credit to smaller homebuilders
and potential homebuyers, a slow economic recovery, excess home inventory and high unemployment
rates, among other factors. The National Association of Homebuilders (NAHB) is now forecasting
437,000 U.S. single-family housing starts for 2011, which is down approximately 7.2% from 2010.
Due to the temporary momentum created by the federal tax credit for first-time
homebuyers, which expired on June 30, 2010, we expected the comparison of quarterly results to the
prior year would be difficult in the second quarter of 2011. While U.S. single-family housing
starts and average commodity prices were down 13.1% and 20.8%, respectively, during the current
quarter as compared to the second quarter of 2010, our sales only decreased 2.4%. We were, also,
able to increase our gross margin percentage by 2.4 percentage points during the quarter compared
to the prior year due to improved pricing on sales of our manufactured products, coupled with less
volatility in the commodity markets. We have continued to manage our operating expenses during
this downturn with a key focus on conserving liquidity. During the quarter, our selling, general
and administrative expenses decreased $2.5 million, or 4.8%, from the same period a year ago,
largely due to a 5.2% reduction of our average full-time equivalent headcount.
We still believe that the long-term outlook for the housing industry is positive due to the
growth in the underlying demographics. While a significant amount of uncertainty in housing still
exists, we believe our market leadership, financial resources and operating efficiencies afford us
the ability to manage through the downturn. We will continue to focus on working capital by
closely monitoring the credit exposure of our customers and by working with our vendors to improve
our payment terms and pricing on our products. We will also continue to work diligently to achieve
the appropriate balance of short-term cost reductions while maintaining the expertise to grow the
business when market conditions improve. We want to create long-term shareholder value and avoid
taking steps that will limit our ability to compete.
SEASONALITY AND OTHER FACTORS
Our first and fourth quarters have historically been, and are expected to continue to be,
adversely affected by weather patterns in some of our markets, resulting in reduced construction
activity. In addition, quarterly results historically have reflected, and are expected to continue
to reflect, fluctuations from period to period arising from the following:
|
|
|
The volatility of lumber prices; |
|
|
|
|
The cyclical nature of the homebuilding industry; |
|
|
|
|
General economic conditions in the markets in which we compete; |
|
|
|
|
The pricing policies of our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
The production schedules of our customers; and |
|
|
|
|
The effects of weather. |
The composition and level of working capital typically change during periods of increasing
sales as we carry more inventory and receivables. Working capital levels typically increase in the
second and third quarters of the year due to higher sales during the peak residential construction
season. These increases have in the past resulted in negative operating cash flows during this peak
season, which generally have been financed through available cash. Collection of receivables and
reduction in inventory levels following the peak building and construction season have in the past
helped to partially offset this negative cash flow. We have also from time to time utilized our
credit facility to cover working capital needs.
12
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the
percentage relationship to sales of certain costs, expenses and income items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
79.3 |
% |
|
|
81.7 |
% |
|
|
79.9 |
% |
|
|
81.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
25.9 |
% |
|
|
27.1 |
% |
Facility closure costs |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(3.9 |
)% |
|
|
(6.0 |
)% |
|
|
(6.3 |
)% |
|
|
(8.8 |
)% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
(8.9 |
)% |
|
|
(9.9 |
)% |
|
|
(13.5 |
)% |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
(9.0 |
)% |
|
|
(9.9 |
)% |
|
|
(13.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared with the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Sales. Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were $206.4 million, a 2.4% decrease
from sales of $211.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. For the three months ended
June 30, 2011, actual U.S. single-family housing starts and units under construction declined 13.1%
and 16.7%, respectively, over this same time period. Average market prices for lumber and lumber
sheet goods were 20.8% lower than the same period a year ago. Despite this price deflation and the
decline in housing activity, our sales of lumber and lumber sheet goods decreased only 8.2% during
the quarter, as we experienced slightly higher sales volume. This decrease was partially offset by
an increase of $1.4 million in other building products and services, due to a sales increase of
roofing and composite decking.
The following table shows sales classified by product category (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
% Change |
|
Prefabricated components |
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
$ |
41.2 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
Windows & doors |
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Lumber & lumber sheet goods |
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
% |
|
|
66.2 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
(8.2 |
)% |
Millwork |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
Other building products & services |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
206.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
211.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin. Gross margin increased $4.1 million to $42.8 million. Our gross margin
percentage increased from 18.3% in the second quarter of 2010 to 20.7% in the current quarter, a
2.4 percentage point increase. Our gross margin percentage increased by 1.8 percentage points due
to improved pricing on sales of our manufactured products, coupled with less volatility in the
commodity markets during the current quarter. The remaining increase in our gross margin
percentage was primarily due to increased sales volume combined with a decrease of fixed costs in
costs of goods sold.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased $2.5 million, or 4.8%. Our salaries and benefits expense, excluding stock compensation
expense, was $28.0 million, a decline of $1.8 million from the second quarter of 2010 primarily due
to a 5.2% reduction of our average full-time equivalent headcount. Delivery expenses decreased
$0.2 million as compared to the second quarter of 2010 due to reduced vehicle and equipment lease
expense which was mostly offset by higher fuel costs.
13
As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 24.3% in
2010 to 23.7% in 2011. Salaries and benefits expense, excluding stock compensation expense, as a
percentage of sales decreased 0.5%. We continue to monitor our operating cost structure closely
and make adjustments as necessary.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense was $5.7 million in the second quarter of 2011, a
decrease of $0.9 million from the second quarter of 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the
expiration of our interest rate swaps during the current quarter.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). We recorded income tax expense of $1.7 million during the
quarter compared to an income tax benefit of $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2010. We
recorded an after-tax, non-cash valuation allowance of $6.8 million and $7.1 million, in 2011 and
2010, respectively, related to our net deferred tax assets. Absent this valuation allowance, our
tax benefit rate would have been 37.5% and 38.5% in 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Sales. Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $369.2 million, a 1.0% decrease from
sales of $372.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. For the six months ended June 30,
2011, actual U.S. single-family housing starts and units under construction declined 16.9% and
16.4%, respectively, over this same time period. Average market prices for lumber and lumber sheet
goods were 11.9% lower than the same period a year ago. Despite this price deflation and the
decline in housing activity, our sales of lumber and lumber sheet goods decreased only 1.6% over
the same time period.
The following table shows sales classified by product category (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
% Change |
|
Prefabricated components |
|
$ |
71.0 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
$ |
73.1 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
(2.9 |
)% |
Windows & doors |
|
|
84.8 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Lumber & lumber sheet goods |
|
|
108.9 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
Millwork |
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
Other building products & services |
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
66.2 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
369.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
372.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin. Gross margin increased $6.1 million to $74.2 million. Our gross margin
percentage increased from 18.3% in the first six months of 2010 to 20.1% in the current period, a
1.8 percentage point increase. Our gross margin percentage increased by 1.2 percentage points due
to improved pricing on sales of our manufactured products, coupled with less volatility in the
commodity markets during the current year. The remaining increase in our gross margin percentage
was primarily due to increased sales volume combined with a decrease of fixed costs in costs of
goods sold.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased $5.2 million, or 5.2%. Our salaries and benefits expense, excluding stock compensation
expense, was $54.6 million, a decline of $3.4 million from the first six months of 2010 primarily
due to a 6.0% reduction of our average full-time equivalent headcount. Delivery expenses decreased
$1.1 million year over year due to reduced vehicle and equipment lease expense which was slightly
offset by higher fuel costs.
As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 27.1% in
2010 to 25.9% in 2011. Salaries and benefits expense, excluding stock compensation expense, as a
percentage of sales decreased 0.8% and delivery costs as a percentage of sales decreased by 0.2%.
We continue to monitor our operating cost structure closely and make adjustments as necessary.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense was $11.5 million in 2011, a decrease of $6.3 million.
The decrease was primarily due to the write-off of $1.6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs
related to long-term debt repaid and $2.5 million of costs incurred related to our recapitalization
transaction in the first half of 2010. The remaining decrease in interest expense is primarily due
to the expiration of our interest rate swaps during the current quarter.
14
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). We recorded income tax expense of $1.6 million for the first six
months of 2011 compared to an income tax benefit of $0.5 million for 2010. We recorded an
after-tax, non-cash valuation allowance of $14.9 million and $18.7 million, in 2011 and 2010,
respectively, related to our net deferred tax assets. Absent this valuation allowance, our tax
benefit rate would have been 38.1% and 37.9% in 2011 and 2010, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Availability under our $150 million revolving credit facility is determined by a borrowing
base. The following table shows our borrowing base, excess availability, borrowing availability and
fixed charge coverage ratio as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Accounts Receivable Availability |
|
$ |
66.4 |
|
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
Inventory Availability |
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
Equipment Availability |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Availability |
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent Reserves |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing Base |
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Borrowings |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
Letters of Credit |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Availability |
|
$ |
65.2 |
|
|
$ |
32.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Liquidity Requirement |
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing Availability |
|
$ |
48.9 |
|
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio |
|
|
-1.37 |
x |
|
|
-2.06 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio* |
|
|
1.00 |
x |
|
|
1.00 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Required to be met only if excess availability falls below our minimum liquidity requirement. |
Our borrowing base consists of trade accounts receivable, inventory and fixed assets, which
meet specific criteria contained within the credit agreement, minus agent specified reserves. Our
net borrowing base availability, net of the minimum liquidity requirement, at June 30, 2011 was
$48.9 million. Excess availability is the sum of borrowing base plus qualified cash, defined as
cash on deposit with the agent subject to a control agreement, minus outstanding borrowings and
letters of credit. This amount must equal or exceed a specified minimum liquidity requirement at
the monthly reporting dates or we are required to meet a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1,
which we currently would not meet.
Further declines in our borrowing base, if any, could compel us to either repay outstanding
borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility or increase our cash on deposit with
the agent in order to meet the minimum liquidity requirement. At June 30, 2011, we had $63.1
million of cash that can be used to either repay the $32.8 million currently funded under the
facility, which consists of $20.0 million of outstanding borrowings and $12.8 million of letters of
credit, or support any shortfall in the net borrowing base availability. At June 30, 2011, we were
not in violation of any covenants or restrictions imposed by any of our debt agreements.
At June 30, 2011, we had total liquidity of $112.0 million, down $3.4 million from the
previous quarter. The $112.0 million of total liquidity consisted of $63.1 million of cash on hand
and $48.9 million of net borrowing base availability. As a result of our financial performance over
the first six months of 2011, we now expect our cash usage for fiscal 2011 will approximate $50
million, which includes $5.3 million for the repayment of our remaining 2012 notes, and expect to
end the year with total liquidity of approximately $85 million, assuming a continuation of current
market conditions. We believe our current liquidity is sufficient to meet our needs over the next
twelve months and do not expect working capital to be a significant source of funds during this
time period.
15
Consolidated Cash Flows
Cash used in operating activities was $38.8 million and $22.4 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively. We received a federal income tax refund of $33.8
million in the second quarter of 2010. Excluding the federal income tax refund received in 2010,
our cash used in operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was approximately $56.2 million.
The decrease in cash used in operating activities is primarily related to lower operating losses in
2011 compared to 2010. The remainder of the decrease was due to changes in working capital.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, cash used in investing activities was $1.3
million and $6.4 million, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to a $5.0 million decrease
in capital expenditures as we had more buyouts of expiring vehicle and equipment leases in the
prior year.
Cash from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased $69.3 million
as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the net
proceeds received upon completion of the rights offering and debt exchange in the first quarter of
2010.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance under the Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements
topic of the Codification which requires separation of the consideration received in such
arrangements by establishing a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a
deliverable, which will be based on available information in the following order: vendor-specific
objective evidence, third-party evidence, or estimated selling price. It also eliminates the
residual method of allocation, requires that the consideration be allocated at the inception of the
arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any
discount in the arrangement to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling price,
and requires that a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is
consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis.
These changes became effective for us on January 1, 2011, but did not have a material impact on
our financial position or results of operations.
16
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We experience changes in interest expense when market interest rates change. However, interest
expense accrues on our 2016 notes at 3-month LIBOR (subject to a 3.0% floor) plus 10.0% and would
not change unless LIBOR increased to greater than 3.0%. Changes in our debt could also increase
these risks. Based on debt outstanding and LIBOR rates at June 30, 2011, a 1.0% increase in
interest rates would result in approximately $0.2 million of additional interest expense annually.
We purchase certain materials, including lumber products, which are then sold to customers as
well as used as direct production inputs for our manufactured products that we deliver. Short-term
changes in the cost of these materials and the related in-bound freight costs, some of which are
subject to significant fluctuations, are sometimes, but not always, passed on to our customers. Our
delayed ability to pass on material price increases to our customers can adversely impact our
operating results.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications. Our management, with the
participation of our principal executive officer (CEO) and principal financial officer (CFO),
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. The controls
evaluation was conducted by our Disclosure Committee, comprised of senior representatives from our
finance, accounting, internal audit, and legal departments under the supervision of our CEO and
CFO.
Certifications of our CEO and our CFO, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), are attached as exhibits to this
quarterly report. This Controls and Procedures section includes the information concerning the
controls evaluation referred to in the certifications, and it should be read in conjunction with
the certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. We do not expect that our disclosure controls
and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A system of controls and procedures, no
matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that
the objectives of the system are met. Because of the limitations in all such systems, no evaluation
can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been detected. Furthermore, the design of any system of controls and procedures is
based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions, regardless of how unlikely. Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective
system of controls and procedures, misstatements or omissions due to error or fraud may occur and
not be detected.
Scope of the Controls Evaluation. The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
included a review of their objectives and design, the Companys implementation of the controls and
procedures and the effect of the controls and procedures on the information generated for use in
this quarterly report. In the course of the evaluation, we sought to identify whether we had any
data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action,
including process improvements, were being undertaken if needed. This type of evaluation is
performed on a quarterly basis so that conclusions concerning the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures can be reported in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Many of the
components of our disclosure controls and procedures are also evaluated by our internal audit
department, our legal department and by personnel in our finance organization. The overall goals of
these various evaluation activities are to monitor our disclosure controls and procedures on an
ongoing basis, and to maintain them as dynamic systems that change as conditions warrant.
Conclusions regarding Disclosure Controls. Based on the required evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of June 30, 2011, we maintain
disclosure controls and procedures that are effective in providing reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the period covered by this
report, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation described above that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
17
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to the conduct of our business in
the ordinary course. We carry insurance coverage in such amounts in excess of our self-insured
retention as we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances and that may or may not cover any
or all of our liabilities in respect of claims and lawsuits. We do not believe that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial
position, cash flows or results of operations.
Although our business and facilities are subject to federal, state and local environmental
regulation, environmental regulation does not have a material impact on our operations. We believe
that our facilities are in material compliance with such laws and regulations. As owners and
lessees of real property, we can be held liable for the investigation or remediation of
contamination on such properties, in some circumstances without regard to whether we knew of or
were responsible for such contamination. Our current expenditures with respect to environmental
investigation and remediation at our facilities are minimal, although no assurance can be provided
that more significant remediation may not be required in the future as a result of spills or
releases of petroleum products or hazardous substances or the discovery of unknown environmental
conditions.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our annual report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing
our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
(a) None
Use of Proceeds
(b) Not applicable
Company Stock Repurchases
(c) None
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
(a) None
(b) None
18
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
(a) Board Determination of Frequency of Stockholder Votes on Executive Compensation
At our annual meeting of stockholders on May 25, 2011, in a non-binding vote on the frequency
of advisory votes on executive compensation, our stockholders selected a vote once every three
years, with 56,959,742 votes for three years, 19,633 votes for two years, 27,695,443 votes for one
year, 55,463 abstentions, and 7,984,328 broker non-votes. In light of that vote, our Board of
Directors determined that we will include an advisory stockholder vote on the compensation of
executives in our proxy materials once every three years. The Board anticipates that the next
stockholder vote on the compensation of executives will be at the annual meeting in 2014.
(b) None
19
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Registration
Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 6, 2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2007, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2010, among Builders
FirstSource, Inc., JLL Partners Fund V, L.P., and Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX,
L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on January 22, 2010, File Number
0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2005, among Builders FirstSource, Inc., the
Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of the
Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27,
2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 8, 2010, among Builders FirstSource, Inc.,
the Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on January 14, 2010, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Indenture, dated as of January 21, 2010, among Builders FirstSource, Inc., the
Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on January 22, 2010, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by M. Chad Crow as Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as Chief Executive
Officer and M. Chad Crow as Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
101***
|
|
The following financial information from Builders FirstSource, Inc.s Form 10-Q filed
on July 29, 2011, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and (iv) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Builders FirstSource, Inc. is furnishing, but not filing, the written
statement pursuant to Title 18 United States Code 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Floyd F. Sherman,
our Chief Executive Officer, and M. Chad Crow, our Chief Financial
Officer. |
|
*** |
|
The Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section and shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates such information by
reference. |
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ FLOYD F. SHERMAN
|
|
|
Floyd F. Sherman |
|
July 29, 2011 |
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ M. CHAD CROW
|
|
|
M. Chad Crow |
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
July 29, 2011
21
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Registration
Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 6, 2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2007, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2010, among Builders
FirstSource, Inc., JLL Partners Fund V, L.P., and Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX,
L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on January 22, 2010, File Number
0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2005, among Builders FirstSource, Inc., the
Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of the
Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27,
2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 8, 2010, among Builders FirstSource, Inc.,
the Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on January 14, 2010, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Indenture, dated as of January 21, 2010, among Builders FirstSource, Inc., the
Guarantors party thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on January 22, 2010, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by M. Chad Crow as Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as Chief Executive
Officer and M. Chad Crow as Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
101***
|
|
The following financial information from Builders FirstSource, Inc.s Form 10-Q filed
on July 29, 2011, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and (iv) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Builders FirstSource, Inc. is furnishing, but not filing, the written
statement pursuant to Title 18 United States Code 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Floyd F. Sherman,
our Chief Executive Officer, and M. Chad Crow, our Chief Financial
Officer. |
|
*** |
|
The Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section and shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates such information by
reference. |
22