þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Wisconsin | 39-0380010 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
Incorporation or Organization) | Identification No.) | |
5757 North Green Bay Avenue | ||
Milwaukee, Wisconsin | 53209 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Large accelerated filer þ
|
Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Class | Shares Outstanding at June 30, 2011 | |||
Common Stock: $0.01 7/18 par value per share |
679,738,648 |
2
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
June 30, | September 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 335 | $ | 560 | $ | 908 | ||||||
Accounts receivable net |
7,094 | 6,095 | 5,452 | |||||||||
Inventories |
2,451 | 1,786 | 1,644 | |||||||||
Other current assets |
2,678 | 2,211 | 2,114 | |||||||||
Current assets |
12,558 | 10,652 | 10,118 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment net |
5,185 | 4,096 | 3,706 | |||||||||
Goodwill |
7,093 | 6,501 | 6,217 | |||||||||
Other intangible assets net |
822 | 741 | 695 | |||||||||
Investments
in partially-owned affiliates |
952 | 728 | 766 | |||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
3,259 | 3,025 | 2,584 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 29,869 | $ | 25,743 | $ | 24,086 | ||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
$ | 592 | $ | 75 | $ | 73 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
65 | 662 | 654 | |||||||||
Accounts payable |
6,104 | 5,426 | 4,874 | |||||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
1,329 | 1,122 | 1,054 | |||||||||
Other current liabilities |
3,064 | 2,625 | 2,377 | |||||||||
Current liabilities |
11,154 | 9,910 | 9,032 | |||||||||
Long-term debt |
4,519 | 2,652 | 2,638 | |||||||||
Postretirement health and other benefits |
228 | 235 | 206 | |||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
2,260 | 2,573 | 2,565 | |||||||||
Long-term liabilities |
7,007 | 5,460 | 5,409 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18) |
||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
229 | 196 | 163 | |||||||||
Shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
11,361 | 10,071 | 9,395 | |||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
118 | 106 | 87 | |||||||||
Total equity |
11,479 | 10,177 | 9,482 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 29,869 | $ | 25,743 | $ | 24,086 | ||||||
3
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
||||||||||||||||
Products and systems* |
$ | 8,202 | $ | 6,798 | $ | 23,904 | $ | 20,116 | ||||||||
Services* |
2,162 | 1,742 | 6,141 | 5,149 | ||||||||||||
10,364 | 8,540 | 30,045 | 25,265 | |||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
||||||||||||||||
Products and systems* |
6,954 | 5,783 | 20,455 | 17,254 | ||||||||||||
Services* |
1,860 | 1,418 | 5,152 | 4,213 | ||||||||||||
8,814 | 7,201 | 25,607 | 21,467 | |||||||||||||
Gross profit |
1,550 | 1,339 | 4,438 | 3,798 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(1,094 | ) | (895 | ) | (3,055 | ) | (2,625 | ) | ||||||||
Net financing charges |
(43 | ) | (39 | ) | (124 | ) | (117 | ) | ||||||||
Equity income |
56 | 52 | 183 | 156 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
469 | 457 | 1,442 | 1,212 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
89 | 31 | 274 | 123 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
380 | 426 | 1,168 | 1,089 | ||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
23 | 8 | 82 | 47 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
$ | 357 | $ | 418 | $ | 1,086 | $ | 1,042 | ||||||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.62 | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.55 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.52 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 1.58 | $ | 1.53 |
* | Products and systems consist of automotive experience and power solutions products and systems and building efficiency installed systems. Services are building efficiency technical and global workplace solutions. |
4
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Operating Activities |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
$ | 357 | $ | 418 | $ | 1,086 | $ | 1,042 | ||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
23 | 8 | 82 | 47 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
380 | 426 | 1,168 | 1,089 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
180 | 158 | 511 | 492 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
13 | 10 | 36 | 32 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of partially-owned affiliates,
net of dividends received |
(7 | ) | 6 | (80 | ) | (38 | ) | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(95 | ) | (51 | ) | (95 | ) | (95 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment charges |
| 11 | | 30 | ||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation |
13 | 8 | 49 | 37 | ||||||||||||
Other |
23 | 9 | 44 | 42 | ||||||||||||
Changes in working capital, excluding acquisitions: |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
99 | (182 | ) | (416 | ) | (218 | ) | |||||||||
Inventories |
(133 | ) | (111 | ) | (432 | ) | (208 | ) | ||||||||
Other current assets |
(35 | ) | (58 | ) | (154 | ) | (169 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring reserves |
(14 | ) | (32 | ) | (83 | ) | (156 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(200 | ) | 219 | (75 | ) | 595 | ||||||||||
Accrued income taxes |
169 | 14 | 88 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
393 | 427 | 561 | 1,448 | ||||||||||||
Investing Activities |
||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(365 | ) | (215 | ) | (900 | ) | (526 | ) | ||||||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment |
18 | 10 | 36 | 34 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
(458 | ) | (17 | ) | (1,087 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||||
Recoverable customer engineering expenditures |
(33 | ) | (18 | ) | (72 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in long-term investments |
(78 | ) | (45 | ) | (128 | ) | (75 | ) | ||||||||
Cash used by investing activities |
(916 | ) | (285 | ) | (2,151 | ) | (655 | ) | ||||||||
Financing Activities |
||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in short-term debt net |
486 | 10 | 499 | (569 | ) | |||||||||||
Increase in long-term debt |
94 | 6 | 1,829 | 519 | ||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(5 | ) | (21 | ) | (764 | ) | (524 | ) | ||||||||
Payment of cash dividends |
(108 | ) | (87 | ) | (304 | ) | (251 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
10 | 12 | 95 | 44 | ||||||||||||
Settlement of interest rate swaps |
| | 24 | | ||||||||||||
Other |
(14 | ) | (3 | ) | (22 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||
Cash provided (used) by financing activities |
463 | (83 | ) | 1,357 | (801 | ) | ||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(6 | ) | 79 | 8 | 155 | |||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(66 | ) | 138 | (225 | ) | 147 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
401 | 770 | 560 | 761 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 335 | $ | 908 | $ | 335 | $ | 908 | ||||||||
5
1. | Financial Statements |
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Johnson Controls, Inc. (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of results for the Companys 2011 fiscal year because of seasonal and other factors. | ||
Certain amounts as of June 30, 2010 have been revised to conform to the current years presentation. Certain amounts for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2010 included within the financing activities section of the consolidated statement of cash flows have been reclassified for comparative purposes. Also, effective October 1, 2010, the building efficiency business unit reorganized its management reporting structure to reflect its current business activities. Historical information has been revised to reflect the new building efficiency reportable segment structure. Refer to Note 17, Segment Information, to the financial statements for further information. | ||
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Johnson Controls, Inc. and its domestic and non-U.S. subsidiaries that are consolidated in conformity with U.S. GAAP. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Investments in partially-owned affiliates are accounted for by the equity method when the Companys interest exceeds 20% and the Company does not have a controlling interest. | ||
On October 1, 2010, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. ASU No. 2009-17 amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIEs) and requires additional disclosures concerning an enterprises continuing involvement with VIEs. Under certain criteria as provided for in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 810, Consolidation, the Company may consolidate a partially-owned affiliate. To determine whether to consolidate a partially-owned affiliate, the Company first determines if the entity is a VIE. An entity is considered to be a VIE if it has one of the following characteristics: 1) the entity is thinly capitalized; 2) residual equity holders do not control the entity; 3) equity holders are shielded from economic losses or do not participate fully in the entitys residual economics; or 4) the entity was established with non-substantive voting. If the entity meets one of these characteristics, the Company then determines if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The party with the power to direct activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance and the potential to absorb benefits or losses that could be significant to the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and consolidates the VIE. The Company evaluated the impact of this guidance and determined that the adoption did not result in consolidation of additional entities or deconsolidation of existing VIEs. As such, the adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations, and appropriate disclosures have been included herein. | ||
Consolidated VIEs | ||
Based upon the criteria set forth in ASC 810, the Company has determined that for the reporting periods ended June 30, 2011, September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 it was the primary beneficiary in two VIEs in which it holds less than 50% ownership as the Company absorbs significant economics of the entities and has the power to direct the activities that are considered most significant to the entities. The Company funds the entities short term liquidity needs through revolving credit facilities and has the power to direct the activities that are considered most significant to the entities through its key customer supply relationships. These two VIEs manufacture products in North America for the automotive industry. The carrying amounts and classification of assets (none of which are restricted) and liabilities included in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial position for the consolidated VIEs are as follows (in millions): |
6
June 30, | September 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 179 | $ | 215 | $ | 187 | ||||||
Noncurrent assets |
55 | 69 | 72 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 234 | $ | 284 | $ | 259 | ||||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 132 | $ | 174 | $ | 165 | ||||||
Noncurrent liabilities |
| | | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 132 | $ | 174 | $ | 165 | ||||||
Nonconsolidated VIEs | ||
During the three month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company acquired a 40% interest in an equity method investee. The investee produces and sells lead-acid batteries of which the Company will both purchase and supply certain batteries to complement each investment partners portfolio. Commencing on the third anniversary of the closing date, the Company has a contractual right to purchase the remaining 60% equity interest in the investee (the call option). If the Company does not exercise the call option on or before the fifth anniversary of the closing date and for a period of six months thereafter, the Company is subject to a contractual obligation at the counterpartys option to sell the Companys equity investment in the investee to the counterparty (the repurchase option). The purchase price is fixed under both the call option and the repurchase option. Based upon the criteria set forth in ASC 810, the Company has determined that the investee is a VIE as the equity holders, through their equity investments, may not participate fully in the entitys residual economics. The Company is not the primary beneficiary as the Company does not have the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE. Therefore, the investee is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as the Companys interest exceeds 20% and the Company does not have a controlling interest. The investment balance included within investments in partially-owned affiliates in the condensed consolidated statement of financial position at June 30, 2011 was $48 million, which represents the Companys maximum exposure to loss. Current assets and liabilities related to the VIE are immaterial and represent normal course of business trade receivables and payables for all presented periods. | ||
Based upon the criteria set forth in ASC 810, the Company has determined that it holds a variable interest in an equity method investee that was considered thinly capitalized at the time of its initial investment. The entity has been primarily financed with third party debt. During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, the owners of the remaining interest exercised their option to put their interest to the Company. The Company has twelve months from the date the notice was received to set the date of the put closing or to secure a third party buyer. The value of the put will be at a price that approximates fair value. The Company is not the primary beneficiary as the Company cannot make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE prior to the put closing. Therefore, the entity is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as the Companys interest exceeds 20% and the Company does not have a controlling interest. The investment balance included within investments in partially-owned affiliates in the condensed consolidated statement of financial position at June 30, 2011 was $43 million, which represents the Companys maximum exposure to loss. The investment balance at September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 was $41 million. Current liabilities due to the VIE are immaterial and represent normal course of business trade payables for all presented periods. Additionally, the Company consumes a significant amount of the investees manufacturing output. | ||
The Company did not have a significant variable interest in any other unconsolidated VIEs for the presented reporting periods. |
7
2. | New Accounting Standards |
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders equity. All non-owner changes in shareholders equity instead must be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Also, reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income must be presented on the face of the financial statements. ASU No. 2011-05 will be effective for the Company for the quarter ending December 31, 2012. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations. | ||
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies and changes the application of various fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements, and will be effective for the Company in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 (January 1, 2012). The Company has assessed the updated guidance and expects adoption to have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Refer to Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, to the financial statements for disclosures surrounding the Companys fair value measurements. | ||
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. ASU No. 2009-17 changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. This statement was effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 (October 1, 2010). The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Refer to Note 1, Financial Statements, to the financial statements for further discussion. | ||
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. ASU No. 2009-13 provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This guidance eliminates the use of the residual method allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific or third-party evidence is available. The amendments in this ASU also expand the disclosures related to a vendors multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The Company adopted ASU No. 2009-13 on October 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations, and appropriate disclosures have been included herein. | ||
The Companys building efficiency business sells certain heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration products and services in bundled arrangements, where multiple products and/or services are involved. Significant deliverables within these arrangements include equipment, commissioning, service labor and extended warranties. In order to estimate relative selling price, market data and transfer price studies are utilized. Approximately four to twelve months separate the timing of the first deliverable until the last piece of equipment is delivered, and there may be extended warranty arrangements with duration of one to five years commencing upon the end of the standard warranty period. As each deliverable had a determinable relative selling price and the residual method was not previously utilized by the Company, there were no changes in units of accounting, the allocation process, or the pattern and timing of revenue recognition upon adoption of ASU No. 2009-13. Furthermore, adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations in subsequent periods. |
8
3. | Acquisition of Businesses |
During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of Keiper/Recaro Automotive, a leader in recliner system technology with engineering and manufacturing expertise in metals and mechanisms for automobile seats, based in Kaiserslautern, Germany. The total purchase price, net of cash acquired, was approximately $450 million, all of which was paid during the three months ended June 30, 2011. In connection with the Keiper/Recaro Automotive acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $189 million in the automotive experience Europe segment. The purchase price allocation may be subsequently adjusted to reflect final valuation studies. | ||
The Keiper/Recaro Automotive acquisition strengthens the Companys metal components and mechanisms business. Keiper/Recaros expertise includes the complete engineering process and technologies used to produce metal seat components, structures and mechanisms. The product range encompasses mechanisms which adjust the seats length and height, recliners that adjust the backrest position of vehicle seats, and rear seat latches. The acquisition strengthens the Companys competitive position in key seating components with expanded opportunities to develop new differentiating products and technologies. Increasing vertical integration and enhancing the Companys seating components technologies are expected to accelerate future growth of the Companys automotive seating business. | ||
During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of the C. Rob. Hammerstein Group (Hammerstein), a leading global supplier of high-quality metal seat structures, components and mechanisms based in Solingen, Germany. The total purchase price, net of cash acquired, was approximately $529 million, all of which was paid during the nine months ended June 30, 2011. In connection with the Hammerstein acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $217 million in the automotive experience Europe segment. The purchase price allocation may be subsequently adjusted to reflect final valuation studies. | ||
The Hammerstein acquisition enables the Companys automotive experience business to enhance its expertise in metal seat structures and expand into premium vehicle segments. Hammersteins strong product portfolio and customer base in the premium segment complements the Companys product portfolio, which is primarily comprised of vehicle segments with high production volumes. Hammersteins product capabilities include front seat structures, seat tracks and height adjusters, multi-way adjusters, power gear boxes, as well as special applications such as steering column adjusters. Hammersteins expertise includes the complete product development process, from design and engineering to the manufacture of individual components and complete seat systems. | ||
In the first nine months of fiscal 2011, the Company completed three additional acquisitions for a combined purchase price, net of cash acquired, of $108 million, all of which was paid in the nine months ended June 30, 2011. The acquisitions in the aggregate were not material to the Companys consolidated financial statements. In connection with the acquisitions, the Company recorded goodwill of $30 million. The purchase price allocations may be subsequently adjusted to reflect final valuation studies. | ||
In the first nine months of fiscal 2010, the Company completed three acquisitions for a combined purchase price of $35 million, of which $32 million was paid as of June 30, 2010. The acquisitions in the aggregate were not material to the Companys consolidated financial statements. In connection with the acquisitions, the Company recorded goodwill of $5 million. |
4. | Percentage-of-Completion Contracts |
The building efficiency business records certain long-term contracts under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Under this method, sales and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred and total estimated costs at completion. The Company records costs and earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts within accounts receivable net and billings in excess of costs and earnings on uncompleted contracts within other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position. Amounts included within accounts receivable net related to these contracts were $798 million, $683 million and $614 million at June 30, 2011, September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively. Amounts |
9
included within other current liabilities were $769 million, $639 million and $610 million at June 30, 2011, September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively. |
5. | Inventories |
Inventories consisted of the following (in millions): |
June 30, | September 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Raw materials and supplies |
$ | 1,144 | $ | 899 | $ | 787 | ||||||
Work-in-process |
428 | 278 | 254 | |||||||||
Finished goods |
1,013 | 743 | 693 | |||||||||
FIFO inventories |
2,585 | 1,920 | 1,734 | |||||||||
LIFO reserve |
(134 | ) | (134 | ) | (90 | ) | ||||||
Inventories |
$ | 2,451 | $ | 1,786 | $ | 1,644 | ||||||
10
6. | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Effective October 1, 2010, the building efficiency business unit reorganized its management reporting structure to reflect its current business activities. Historical information has been revised to reflect the new building efficiency reportable segment structure. Refer to Note 17, Segment Information, to the financial statements for further information. | ||
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill in each of the Companys reporting segments for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 and the nine month period ended June 30, 2011 were as follows (in millions): |
Currency | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Business | Translation and | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | Acquisitions | Other | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Building efficiency |
||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 526 | $ | | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 522 | |||||||
North America service |
672 | 4 | | 676 | ||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
169 | | 8 | 177 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
368 | | 11 | 379 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,035 | | 50 | 1,085 | ||||||||||||
Automotive experience |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
1,377 | | 1 | 1,378 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
1,022 | 4 | 114 | 1,140 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
218 | | 15 | 233 | ||||||||||||
Power solutions |
830 | 51 | 30 | 911 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,217 | $ | 59 | $ | 225 | $ | 6,501 | ||||||||
Currency | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Business | Translation and | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | Acquisitions | Other | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Building efficiency |
||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 522 | $ | | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 519 | |||||||
North America service |
676 | | | 676 | ||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
177 | | 7 | 184 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
379 | | 12 | 391 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,085 | | 36 | 1,121 | ||||||||||||
Automotive experience |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
1,378 | 4 | | 1,382 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
1,140 | 429 | 70 | 1,639 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
233 | | 10 | 243 | ||||||||||||
Power solutions |
911 | 3 | 24 | 938 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,501 | $ | 436 | $ | 156 | $ | 7,093 | ||||||||
11
June 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying |
Accumulated | Gross Carrying |
Accumulated | Gross Carrying |
Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Net | Amount | Amortization | Net | Amount | Amortization | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized intangible assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patented technology |
$ | 287 | $ | (215 | ) | $ | 72 | $ | 277 | $ | (191 | ) | $ | 86 | $ | 266 | $ | (180 | ) | $ | 86 | |||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
440 | (85 | ) | 355 | 373 | (70 | ) | 303 | 344 | (64 | ) | 280 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous |
113 | (35 | ) | 78 | 68 | (31 | ) | 37 | 63 | (28 | ) | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total amortized intangible assets |
840 | (335 | ) | 505 | 718 | (292 | ) | 426 | 673 | (272 | ) | 401 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized intangible assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks |
317 | | 317 | 315 | | 315 | 294 | | 294 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets |
$ | 1,157 | $ | (335 | ) | $ | 822 | $ | 1,033 | $ | (292 | ) | $ | 741 | $ | 967 | $ | (272 | ) | $ | 695 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of other intangible assets for the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $13 million and $10 million, respectively. Amortization of other intangible assets for the nine month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $36 million and $32 million, respectively. Excluding the impact of future acquisitions, the Company anticipates amortization for fiscal 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 will be approximately $46 million, $40 million, $38 million, $36 million and $33 million per year, respectively. |
7. | Product Warranties |
The Company offers warranties to its customers depending upon the specific product and terms of the customer purchase agreement. A typical warranty program requires that the Company replace defective products within a specified time period from the date of sale. The Company records an estimate for future warranty-related costs based on actual historical return rates and other known factors. Based on analysis of return rates and other factors, the adequacy of the Companys warranty provisions are adjusted as necessary. The Company monitors its warranty activity and adjusts its reserve estimates when it is probable that future warranty costs will be different than those estimates. | ||
The Companys product warranty liability is recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of financial position in other current liabilities if the warranty is less than one year and in other noncurrent liabilities if the warranty extends longer than one year. | ||
The changes in the carrying amount of the Companys total product warranty liability for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows (in millions): |
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 337 | $ | 344 | ||||
Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
150 | 169 | ||||||
Accruals from acquisitions |
| 2 | ||||||
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including
changes in estimates) |
(32 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period |
(165 | ) | (184 | ) | ||||
Currency translation |
5 | (9 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 295 | $ | 321 | ||||
12
8. | Restructuring Costs |
To better align the Companys cost structure with global automotive market conditions, the Company committed to a restructuring plan (2009 Plan) in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and recorded a $230 million restructuring charge. The restructuring charge related to cost reduction initiatives in the Companys automotive experience, building efficiency and power solutions businesses and included workforce reductions and plant consolidations. The Company expects to substantially complete the 2009 Plan by the end of 2011. The automotive-related restructuring actions targeted excess manufacturing capacity resulting from lower industry production in the European, North American and Japanese automotive markets. The restructuring actions in building efficiency were primarily in Europe where the Company is centralizing certain functions and rebalancing its resources to target the geographic markets with the greatest potential growth. Power solutions actions focused on optimizing its manufacturing capacity as a result of lower overall demand for original equipment batteries resulting from lower vehicle production levels. | ||
Since the announcement of the 2009 Plan in March 2009, the Company has experienced lower employee severance and termination benefit cash payouts than previously calculated for automotive experience in Europe of approximately $70 million, all of which was identified prior to the current fiscal year, due to favorable severance negotiations and the decision to not close previously planned plants in response to increased customer demand. The underspend of the initial 2009 Plan reserves has been committed for additional costs incurred as part of power solutions and automotive experience Europe and North Americas additional cost reduction initiatives. The planned workforce reductions disclosed for the 2009 Plan have been updated for the Companys revised actions. | ||
The following table summarizes the changes in the Companys 2009 Plan reserve, included within other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position (in millions): |
Employee | ||||||||||||
Severance and | ||||||||||||
Termination | Currency | |||||||||||
Benefits | Translation | Total | ||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 54 | $ | 2 | $ | 56 | ||||||
Utilized cash |
(6 | ) | | (6 | ) | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 48 | $ | 2 | $ | 50 | ||||||
Utilized cash |
(24 | ) | | (24 | ) | |||||||
Utilized noncash |
| 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | 24 | $ | 3 | $ | 27 | ||||||
Utilized cash |
(8 | ) | | (8 | ) | |||||||
Utilized noncash |
| (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
$ | 16 | $ | 2 | $ | 18 | ||||||
To better align the Companys resources with its growth strategies while reducing the cost structure of its global operations, the Company committed to a restructuring plan (2008 Plan) in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and recorded a $495 million restructuring charge. The restructuring charge related to cost reduction initiatives in its automotive experience, building efficiency and power solutions businesses and included workforce reductions and plant consolidations. The Company expects to substantially complete the 2008 Plan by the end of 2011. The automotive-related restructuring was in response to the fundamentals of the European and North American automotive markets. The actions targeted reductions in the Companys cost base by decreasing excess manufacturing capacity due to lower industry production and the continued movement of vehicle production to low-cost countries, especially in Europe. The restructuring actions in building efficiency were primarily in Europe where the Company centralized certain functions and rebalanced its resources to target the geographic markets with the greatest potential growth. Power solutions actions focused on optimizing its regional manufacturing capacity. |
13
Since the announcement of the 2008 Plan in September 2008, the Company has experienced lower employee severance and termination benefit cash payouts than previously calculated in Europe for building efficiency and automotive experience of approximately $95 million, all of which was identified prior to the current fiscal year, due to favorable severance negotiations, individuals transferred to open positions within the Company and changes in cost reduction actions from plant consolidation to downsizing of operations. The underspend of the initial 2008 Plan has been committed for similar additional restructuring actions. The underspend experienced by building efficiency in Europe has been committed by the same group for workforce reductions and plant consolidations. The underspend experienced by automotive experience in Europe has been committed for additional plant consolidations for automotive experience in North America and workforce reductions for building efficiency in Europe. The planned workforce reductions disclosed for the 2008 Plan have been updated for the Companys revised actions. | ||
The following table summarizes the changes in the Companys 2008 Plan reserve, included within other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position (in millions): |
Employee | ||||||||||||
Severance and | ||||||||||||
Termination | Currency | |||||||||||
Benefits | Translation | Total | ||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 108 | $ | (28 | ) | $ | 80 | |||||
Utilized cash |
(24 | ) | | (24 | ) | |||||||
Utilized noncash |
| (2 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 84 | $ | (30 | ) | $ | 54 | |||||
Utilized cash |
(15 | ) | | (15 | ) | |||||||
Utilized noncash |
| 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | 69 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | 40 | |||||
Utilized cash |
(6 | ) | | (6 | ) | |||||||
Utilized noncash |
| 3 | 3 | |||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
$ | 63 | $ | (26 | ) | $ | 37 | |||||
The 2008 and 2009 Plans included workforce reductions of approximately 20,400 employees (9,500 for automotive experience North America, 5,200 for automotive experience Europe, 1,100 for automotive experience Asia, 2,900 for building efficiency other, 700 for building efficiency global workplace solutions, 200 for building efficiency Asia and 800 for power solutions). Restructuring charges associated with employee severance and termination benefits are paid over the severance period granted to each employee and on a lump sum basis when required in accordance with individual severance agreements. As of June 30, 2011, approximately 17,100 of the employees have been separated from the Company pursuant to the 2008 and 2009 Plans. In addition, the 2008 and 2009 Plans included 33 plant closures (14 for automotive experience North America, 11 for automotive experience Europe, 3 for automotive experience Asia, 2 for building efficiency other and 3 for power solutions). As of June 30, 2011, 26 of the 33 plants have been closed. | ||
Company management closely monitors its overall cost structure and continually analyzes each of its businesses for opportunities to consolidate current operations, improve operating efficiencies and locate facilities in low cost countries in close proximity to customers. This ongoing analysis includes a review of its manufacturing, engineering and purchasing operations, as well as the overall global footprint for all its businesses. Because of the importance of new vehicle sales by major automotive manufacturers to operations, the Company is affected by the general business conditions in this industry. Future adverse developments in the automotive industry could impact the Companys liquidity position, lead to impairment charges and/or require additional restructuring of its operations. |
14
9. | Income Taxes |
The more significant components of the Companys income tax provision are as follows (in millions): |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Federal, state and foreign income tax
expense at annual effective rate |
$ | 89 | $ | 82 | $ | 274 | $ | 218 | ||||||||
Valuation allowance adjustment |
| (13 | ) | | (106 | ) | ||||||||||
Uncertain tax positions |
| (38 | ) | | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Medicare Part D |
| | | 18 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 89 | $ | 31 | $ | 274 | $ | 123 | ||||||||
Effective Tax Rate | ||
In calculating the provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimate of the annual effective tax rate based upon the facts and circumstances known at each interim period. On a quarterly basis, the actual effective tax rate is adjusted, as appropriate, based upon changed facts and circumstances, if any, as compared to those forecasted at the beginning of the fiscal year and each interim period thereafter. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011, the Companys estimated annual effective income tax rate from continuing operations is 19% versus the prior year rate of 18%. | ||
Valuation Allowance | ||
The Company reviews its deferred tax asset valuation allowances on a quarterly basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a review is required. In determining the requirement for a valuation allowance, the historical and projected financial results of the legal entity or consolidated group recording the net deferred tax asset are considered, along with any other positive or negative evidence. Since future financial results may differ from previous estimates, periodic adjustments to the Companys valuation allowances may be necessary. | ||
It is reasonably possible that over the remainder of fiscal 2011, valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions of up to $50 million may be released. | ||
In the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company performed an analysis of its worldwide deferred tax assets. As a result, and after considering tax planning initiatives and other positive and negative evidence, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets within a Slovakia automotive entity would be utilized. Therefore, the Company released $13 million of valuation allowances in the three month period ended June 30, 2010. | ||
In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets within the Brazil automotive entity would be utilized. Therefore, the Company released $69 million of valuation allowances. This was comprised of a $93 million decrease in income tax expense offset by a $24 million reduction in cumulative translation adjustments. | ||
Uncertain Tax Positions | ||
At September 30, 2010, the Company had gross tax effected unrecognized tax benefits of $1,262 million of which $1,063 million, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. Total net accrued interest at September 30, 2010 was approximately $68 million (net of tax benefit). The net change in interest and penalties during the nine months ended June 30, 2011 was $27 million, and for the same period in fiscal 2010 was $52 million, including $26 million of periodic interest expense on existing uncertain tax positions and $26 million related to the events described |
15
below. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. | ||
Based on published case law in a non-U.S. jurisdiction and the settlement of a tax audit during the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company released net $38 million of reserves for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties. | ||
As a result of certain events related to prior year tax planning initiatives, during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company increased the reserve for uncertain tax positions by $31 million, including $26 million of interest and penalties, which impacted the effective tax rate. | ||
The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Judgment is required in determining its worldwide provision for income taxes and recording the related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course of the Companys business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company is regularly under audit by tax authorities, including major jurisdictions noted below: |
Tax | Statute of | |
Jurisdiction | Limitations | |
Austria
|
5 years | |
Belgium
|
3 years | |
Brazil
|
5 years | |
Canada
|
5 years | |
China
|
3 to 5 years | |
Czech Republic
|
3 years | |
France
|
3 years | |
Germany
|
4 to 5 years | |
Italy
|
4 years | |
Japan
|
5 to 7 years | |
Mexico
|
5 years | |
Poland
|
5 years | |
Spain
|
4 years | |
United Kingdom
|
4 years | |
United States Federal
|
3 years | |
United States State
|
3 to 5 years |
16
In the U.S., the fiscal years 2007 through 2009 are currently under exam by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and 2004 through 2006 are currently under IRS Appeals. Additionally, the Company is currently under exam in the following major foreign jurisdictions: |
Tax Jurisdiction | Tax Years Covered | |
Austria
|
2006 2008 | |
Belgium
|
2008 2009 | |
Brazil
|
2005 2008 | |
Canada
|
2007 2008 | |
Czech Republic
|
2007 2008 | |
France
|
2002 2010 | |
Germany
|
2001 2009 | |
Italy
|
2005 2007 | |
Mexico
|
2003 2004 | |
Poland
|
2007 2008 | |
Spain
|
2006 2008 |
It is reasonably possible that certain tax examinations, appellate proceedings and/or tax litigation will conclude within the next 12 months, the impact of which could be up to a $100 million adjustment to tax expense. | ||
Impacts of Tax Legislation | ||
On March 23, 2010, the U.S. President signed into law comprehensive health care reform legislation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (HR3590). Included among the major provisions of the law is a change in the tax treatment of a portion of Medicare Part D medical payments. The Company recorded a noncash charge of approximately $18 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 to reflect the impact of this change. | ||
During the nine month period ended June 30, 2011, tax legislation was adopted in various jurisdictions. None of these changes had a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. |
10. | Retirement Plans |
The components of the Companys net periodic benefit costs associated with its defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement health and other benefits are shown in the tables below in accordance with ASC 715, Compensation Retirement Benefits (in millions): |
U.S. Pension Plans | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 16 | $ | 16 | $ | 49 | $ | 50 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
36 | 38 | 108 | 114 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(53 | ) | (44 | ) | (157 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
14 | 8 | 42 | 22 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
1 | | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 14 | $ | 18 | $ | 43 | $ | 53 | ||||||||
17
Non-U.S. Pension Plans | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 26 | $ | 28 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
17 | 16 | 51 | 51 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(20 | ) | (15 | ) | (58 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
3 | 3 | 9 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| | 1 | | ||||||||||||
Settlement loss |
| | | 1 | ||||||||||||
Curtailment gain |
| | (19 | ) | | |||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 9 | $ | 13 | $ | 10 | $ | 41 | ||||||||
Postretirement Health and Other Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | $ | 3 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
3 | 4 | 10 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
1 | | 2 | | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service credit |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | (13 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 2 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
11. | Debt and Financing Arrangements |
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, a 150 million euro revolving credit facility and a 50 million euro revolving credit facility matured. There were no draws outstanding on either facility. | ||
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, a total of 157,820 equity units, which had a purchase contract settlement date of March 31, 2012, were early exercised. As a result, the Company issued 766,673 shares of Johnson Controls, Inc. common stock and approximately $8 million of 11.50% notes due 2042. | ||
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company replaced its $2.05 billion committed five-year credit facility, scheduled to mature in December 2011, with a $2.5 billion committed four-year credit facility scheduled to mature in February 2015. The facility is used to support the Companys outstanding commercial paper. At June 30, 2011, there were no draws on the facility. | ||
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company issued $350 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate senior unsecured notes due in fiscal 2014, $450 million aggregate principal amount of 1.75% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2014, $500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.25% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2021 and $300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.70% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2041. Aggregate net proceeds of $1.6 billion from the issues were used for general corporate purposes including the retirement of short-term debt. | ||
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company entered into a 6-year, 100 million euro, floating rate loan scheduled to mature in February 2017. Proceeds from the facility were used for general corporate purposes. |
18
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company retired $654 million in principal amount, plus accrued interest, of its 5.25% fixed rate notes that matured on January 15, 2011. The Company used cash to fund the payment. | ||
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company retired its $100 million committed revolving facility prior to its scheduled maturity date of December 2011. There were no draws on the facility. | ||
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company repaid debt of $82 million which was acquired as part of an acquisition in the same quarter. The Company used cash to repay the debt. | ||
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company retired approximately $18 million in principal amount of its fixed rate notes scheduled to mature on January 15, 2011. The Company used cash to fund the repurchases. | ||
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, a total of 200 bonds ($200,000 par value) of the Companys 6.5% convertible senior notes scheduled to mature on September 30, 2012, were redeemed for Johnson Controls, Inc. common stock. | ||
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, a 50 million euro revolving credit facility expired and the Company entered into a new one year committed, revolving credit facility in the amount of 50 million euro expiring in May 2011. At June 30, 2010, there were no draws on the revolving credit facility. | ||
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2020. Net proceeds from the issue were used for general corporate purposes including the retirement of short-term debt. | ||
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company retired approximately $61 million in principal amount of its fixed rate notes scheduled to mature on January 15, 2011. The Company used cash to fund the repurchases. | ||
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company retired its 18 billion yen, three year, floating rate loan agreement scheduled to mature on January 18, 2011. The Company used cash to repay the note. | ||
During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the Company retired its 12 billion yen, three year, floating rate loan agreement that matured. Additionally, the Company retired its 7 billion yen, three year, floating rate loan agreement scheduled to mature on January 18, 2011. The Company used cash to repay the notes. | ||
During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the Company retired approximately $13 million in principal amount of its fixed rate notes scheduled to mature on January 15, 2011. Additionally, the Company repurchased 1,685 notes ($1,685,000 par value) of its 6.5% convertible senior notes scheduled to mature on September 30, 2012. The Company used cash to fund the repurchases. |
12. | Earnings Per Share |
The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) amounts. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding during the reporting period that are calculated using the treasury stock method for stock options. The treasury stock method assumes that the Company uses the proceeds from the exercise of awards to repurchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method include the purchase price that the grantee will pay in the future, compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized and any windfall tax benefits that would be credited to capital in excess of par value when the award generates a tax deduction. If there would be a shortfall resulting in a charge to capital in excess of par value, such an amount would be a reduction of the proceeds. |
19
The Companys outstanding Equity Units due 2042 and 6.5% convertible senior notes due 2012 are reflected in diluted earnings per share using the if-converted method. Under this method, if dilutive, the common stock is assumed issued as of the beginning of the reporting period and included in calculating diluted earnings per share. In addition, if dilutive, interest expense, net of tax, related to the outstanding Equity Units and convertible senior notes is added back to the numerator in calculating diluted earnings per share. | ||
The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share (in millions): |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Income Available to Common Shareholders |
||||||||||||||||
Basic income available to common shareholders |
$ | 357 | $ | 418 | $ | 1,086 | $ | 1,042 | ||||||||
Interest expense, net of tax |
1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Diluted income available to common shareholders |
$ | 358 | $ | 419 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 1,046 | ||||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |
||||||||||||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
678.6 | 672.7 | 677.1 | 671.6 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
8.7 | 6.2 | 8.6 | 6.1 | ||||||||||||
Equity units |
3.9 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||
Convertible senior notes |
| 0.1 | | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
691.2 | 683.5 | 690.0 | 682.3 | ||||||||||||
Antidilutive Securities |
||||||||||||||||
Options to purchase common shares |
| 0.5 | | 0.5 |
20
13. | Equity and Noncontrolling Interests |
The following schedules present changes in consolidated equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. and noncontrolling interests (in millions): |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Attributable to |
Equity Attributable to |
Equity Attributable to |
Equity Attributable to |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Johnson | Noncontrolling | Johnson | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||
Controls, Inc. | Interests | Total Equity | Controls, Inc. | Interests | Total Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance, March 31 |
$ | 10,976 | $ | 130 | $ | 11,106 | $ | 9,378 | $ | 96 | $ | 9,474 | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
357 | 10 | 367 | 418 | (5 | ) | 413 | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
131 | (1 | ) | 130 | (322 | ) | (2 | ) | (324 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Realized and unrealized losses
on derivatives |
(7 | ) | | (7 | ) | (14 | ) | | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses
on marketable common stock |
| | | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Employee retirement plans |
(6 | ) | | (6 | ) | 5 | | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
118 | (1 | ) | 117 | (333 | ) | (2 | ) | (335 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
475 | 9 | 484 | 85 | (7 | ) | 78 | |||||||||||||||||
Other changes in equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends -
common stock |
(109 | ) | | (109 | ) | (88 | ) | | (88 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dividends attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
| (22 | ) | (22 | ) | | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Redemption value adjustment attributable
to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
(2 | ) | | (2 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other, including options exercised |
21 | 1 | 22 | 20 | 1 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 11,361 | $ | 118 | $ | 11,479 | $ | 9,395 | $ | 87 | $ | 9,482 | ||||||||||||
21
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011 | Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Attributable to |
Equity Attributable to |
Equity Attributable to |
Equity Attributable to |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Johnson | Noncontrolling | Johnson | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||
Controls, Inc. | Interests | Total Equity | Controls, Inc. | Interests | Total Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance, September 30 |
$ | 10,071 | $ | 106 | $ | 10,177 | $ | 9,100 | $ | 84 | $ | 9,184 | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
1,086 | 41 | 1,127 | 1,042 | 25 | 1,067 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
301 | | 301 | (604 | ) | (3 | ) | (607 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Realized and unrealized losses
on derivatives |
(5 | ) | | (5 | ) | (7 | ) | | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses)
on marketable common stock |
7 | | 7 | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Employee retirement plans |
65 | | 65 | 43 | | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
368 | | 368 | (570 | ) | (3 | ) | (573 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
1,454 | 41 | 1,495 | 472 | 22 | 494 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other changes in equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends -
common stock |
(326 | ) | | (326 | ) | (262 | ) | | (262 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dividends attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
| (30 | ) | (30 | ) | | (20 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Redemption value adjustment attributable
to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
3 | | 3 | 9 | | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other, including options exercised |
159 | 1 | 160 | 76 | 1 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 11,361 | $ | 118 | $ | 11,479 | $ | 9,395 | $ | 87 | $ | 9,482 | ||||||||||||
The Company consolidates certain subsidiaries in which the noncontrolling interest party has within their control the right to require the Company to redeem all or a portion of its interest in the subsidiary. The redeemable noncontrolling interests are reported at their estimated redemption value. Any adjustment to the redemption value impacts retained earnings but does not impact net income. Redeemable noncontrolling interests which are redeemable only upon future events, the occurrence of which is not currently probable, are recorded at carrying value. | ||
The following schedules present changes in the redeemable noncontrolling interests (in millions): |
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Beginning balance, March 31 |
$ | 223 | $ | 153 | ||||
Net income |
13 | 13 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Dividends attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
(6 | ) | | |||||
Redemption value adjustment |
2 | | ||||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 229 | $ | 163 | ||||
22
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Beginning balance, September 30 |
$ | 196 | $ | 155 | ||||
Net income |
41 | 22 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
1 | (5 | ) | |||||
Dividends attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(6 | ) | | |||||
Redemption value adjustment |
(3 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 229 | $ | 163 | ||||
14. | Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
The Company selectively uses derivative instruments to reduce market risk associated with changes in foreign currency, commodities, stock-based compensation liabilities and interest rates. Under Company policy, the use of derivatives is restricted to those intended for hedging purposes; the use of any derivative instrument for speculative purposes is strictly prohibited. A description of each type of derivative utilized by the Company to manage risk is included in the following paragraphs. In addition, refer to Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, to the financial statements for information related to the fair value measurements and valuation methods utilized by the Company for each derivative type. | ||
The Company has global operations and participates in the foreign exchange markets to minimize its risk of loss from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company primarily uses foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge certain of its foreign exchange rate exposures. The Company hedges 70% to 90% of the nominal amount of each of its known foreign exchange transactional exposures. | ||
The Company has entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to selectively hedge portions of its net investment in Japan. The currency effects of the cross-currency interest rate swaps are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) account within shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. where they offset gains and losses recorded on the Companys net investment in Japan. In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company entered into three cross-currency interest rate swaps totaling 20 billion yen. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, a 5 billion yen cross-currency swap matured. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, another 5 billion yen cross-currency swap matured. In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, a 10 billion yen cross-currency swap matured. All three of these cross-currency interest rate swaps were renewed for one year in their respective periods. These swaps are designated as hedges of the Companys net investment in Japan. | ||
The Company uses commodity contracts in the financial derivatives market in cases where commodity price risk cannot be naturally offset or hedged through supply base fixed price contracts. Commodity risks are systematically managed pursuant to policy guidelines. As cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the hedge gains or losses due to changes in fair value are initially recorded as a component of AOCI and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged transactions, typically sales or costs related to sales, occur and affect earnings. Any ineffective portion of the hedge is reflected in the consolidated statement of income. The maturities of the commodity contracts coincide with the expected purchase of the commodities. The Company had the following outstanding commodity hedge contracts that hedge forecasted purchases: |
Volume Outstanding as of | |||||||||||||||||
Commodity | Units | June 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Copper |
Pounds | 13,150,000 | 24,550,000 | 16,735,000 | |||||||||||||
Lead |
Metric Tons | 26,517 | 18,450 | 25,961 | |||||||||||||
Aluminum |
Metric Tons | 1,134 | 8,276 | |
23
24
Derivatives and Hedging Activities Designated as | Derivatives and Hedging Activities Not Designated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 | as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | September 30, | June 30, | June 30, | September 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 8 | $ | 19 | $ | 14 | $ | | $ | 8 | $ | 9 | ||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
8 | 14 | 2 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
15 | | 9 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity swap |
| | | 177 | 104 | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 32 | $ | 34 | $ | 26 | $ | 178 | $ | 113 | $ | 101 | ||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
$ | | $ | | $ | 594 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Other current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
7 | 19 | 15 | 1 | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment hedges |
8 | 17 | 7 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
1 | | 8 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
865 | | 404 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
1 | 1 | 2 | | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 882 | $ | 37 | $ | 1,030 | $ | 1 | $ | 9 | $ | 9 | ||||||||||||
25
As of | Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain | Location of Gain (Loss) | (Loss) Reclassified | Location of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain | ||||||||||||||||
(Loss) Recognized in | Reclassified from AOCI | from AOCI into | Recognized in Income on | (Loss) Recognized in | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow | AOCI on Derivative | into Income (Effective | Income (Effective | Derivative (Ineffective | Income on Derivative | |||||||||||||||
Hedging Relationships | (Effective Portion) | Portion) | Portion) | Portion) | (Ineffective Portion) | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange
derivatives |
$ | 1 | Cost of sales | $ | 2 | Cost of sales | $ | | ||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
5 | Cost of sales | 7 | Cost of sales | | |||||||||||||||
Forward treasury locks |
9 | Net financing charges | | Net financing charges | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 15 | $ | 9 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain | ||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain (Loss) | (Loss) Reclassified | Location of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain | |||||||||||||
Reclassified from AOCI | from AOCI into | Recognized in Income on | (Loss) Recognized in | |||||||||||||
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow | into Income (Effective | Income (Effective | Derivative (Ineffective | Income on Derivative | ||||||||||||
Hedging Relationships | Portion) | Portion) | Portion) | (Ineffective Portion) | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange
derivatives |
Cost of sales | $ | 6 | Cost of sales | $ | | ||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
Cost of sales | 26 | Cost of sales | | ||||||||||||
Forward treasury locks |
Net financing charges | 1 | Net financing charges | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 33 | $ | | ||||||||||||
As of | Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain | Location of Gain (Loss) | (Loss) Reclassified | Location of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain | ||||||||||||||||
(Loss) Recognized in | Reclassified from AOCI | from AOCI into | Recognized in Income on | (Loss) Recognized in | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow | AOCI on Derivative | into Income (Effective | Income (Effective | Derivative (Ineffective | Income on Derivative | |||||||||||||||
Hedging Relationships | (Effective Portion) | Portion) | Portion) | Portion) | (Ineffective Portion) | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange
derivatives |
$ | (1 | ) | Cost of sales | $ | 1 | Cost of sales | $ | | |||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
(5 | ) | Cost of sales | (1 | ) | Cost of sales | | |||||||||||||
Forward treasury locks |
11 | Net financing charges | 1 | Net financing charges | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 5 | $ | 1 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain | ||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain (Loss) | (Loss) Reclassified | Location of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain | |||||||||||||
Reclassified from AOCI | from AOCI into | Recognized in Income on | (Loss) Recognized in | |||||||||||||
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow | into Income (Effective | Income (Effective | Derivative (Ineffective | Income on Derivative | ||||||||||||
Hedging Relationships | Portion) | Portion) | Portion) | (Ineffective Portion) | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange
derivatives |
Cost of sales | $ | (3 | ) | Cost of sales | $ | | |||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
Cost of sales | 1 | Cost of sales | | ||||||||||||
Forward treasury locks |
Net financing charges | 2 | Net financing charges | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Amount of Gain | Amount of Gain | |||||||
(Loss) Recognized in | (Loss) Recognized in | |||||||
CTA on Outstanding | CTA on Outstanding | |||||||
Hedging Activities in ASC 815 Net | Derivatives (Effective | Derivatives (Effective | ||||||
Investment Hedging Relationships | Portion) | Portion) | ||||||
Net investment hedges |
$ | (5 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | ||
Total |
$ | (5 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | ||
26
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||
Amount of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||
Derivatives in ASC 815 Fair Value Hedging | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | |||||||||
Relationships | Derivative | Derivative | Derivative | |||||||||
Interest rate swap |
Net financing charges | $ | 12 | $ | 14 | |||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
Net financing charges | (11 | ) | (14 | ) | |||||||
Total |
$ | 1 | $ | | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||
Amount of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||
Derivatives in ASC 815 Fair Value Hedging | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | |||||||||
Relationships | Derivative | Derivative | Derivative | |||||||||
Interest rate swap |
Net financing charges | $ | 4 | $ | 4 | |||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
Net financing charges | (1 | ) | 5 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 3 | $ | 9 | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||
Amount of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | |||||||||
Instruments under ASC 815 | Derivative | Derivative | Derivative | |||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
Cost of sales | $ | 8 | $ | 18 | |||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
Net financing charges | (7 | ) | (9 | ) | |||||||
Equity swap |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 42 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1 | $ | 51 | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||
Amount of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | |||||||||
Instruments under ASC 815 | Derivative | Derivative | Derivative | |||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
Cost of sales | $ | 110 | $ | 198 | |||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
Net financing charges | (103 | ) | (160 | ) | |||||||
Equity swap |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (21 | ) | 2 | ||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
Cost of sales | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | (13 | ) | $ | 41 | |||||||
27
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
in Active | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Total as of | Markets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Other current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 8 | $ | 8 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
8 | | 8 | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
15 | | 15 | | ||||||||||||
Investments in marketable common stock |
38 | 38 | | | ||||||||||||
Equity swap |
177 | 177 | | | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
2 | 2 | | | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 248 | $ | 225 | $ | 23 | $ | | ||||||||
Other current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 8 | $ | 8 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
8 | | 8 | | ||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
1 | | 1 | | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
865 | | 865 | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
1 | 1 | | | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 883 | $ | 9 | $ | 874 | $ | | ||||||||
28
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
in Active | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Total as of | Markets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Other current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 27 | $ | 27 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
14 | | 14 | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
||||||||||||||||
Investments in marketable common stock |
31 | 31 | | | ||||||||||||
Equity swap |
104 | 104 | | | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
2 | 2 | | | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 178 | $ | 164 | $ | 14 | $ | | ||||||||
Other current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 27 | $ | 27 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
17 | | 17 | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
2 | 2 | | | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 46 | $ | 29 | $ | 17 | $ | | ||||||||
29
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
in Active | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Total as of | Markets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Other current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 23 | $ | 23 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
2 | | 2 | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
9 | | 9 | | ||||||||||||
Investments in marketable common stock |
24 | 24 | | | ||||||||||||
Equity swap |
91 | 91 | | | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
2 | 2 | | | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 151 | $ | 140 | $ | 11 | $ | | ||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
$ | 594 | $ | | $ | 594 | $ | | ||||||||
Other current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
23 | 23 | | | ||||||||||||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
7 | | 7 | | ||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
8 | | 8 | | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
404 | | 404 | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
3 | 3 | | | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 1,039 | $ | 26 | $ | 1,013 | $ | | ||||||||
30
31
32
| The systems and services businesses in Asia, previously included in the rest of world segment, are now part of a new reportable segment named Asia. | ||
| The former Europe segment is now included in the former rest of world segment, which has been renamed other. | ||
| The former North America unitary products segment is now included in the other segment. |
| North America systems designs, produces, markets and installs mechanical equipment that provides heating and cooling in North American non-residential buildings and industrial applications as well as control systems that integrate the operation of this equipment with other critical building systems. | ||
| North America service provides technical services including inspection, scheduled maintenance, repair and replacement of mechanical and control systems in North America, as well as the retrofit and service components of performance contracts and other solutions. | ||
| Global workplace solutions provides on-site staff for complete real estate services, facility operation and management to improve the comfort, productivity, energy efficiency and cost effectiveness of building systems around the globe. | ||
| Asia provides HVAC and refrigeration systems and technical services to the Asian marketplace. |
33
| Other provides HVAC and refrigeration systems and technical services to markets in Europe, the Middle East and Latin America. Other also designs and produces heating and air conditioning solutions for residential and light commercial applications and markets products to the replacement and new construction markets. |
Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Building efficiency |
||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 633 | $ | 551 | $ | 1,711 | $ | 1,552 | ||||||||
North America service |
601 | 531 | 1,639 | 1,505 | ||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
1,046 | 787 | 3,053 | 2,404 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
498 | 349 | 1,334 | 988 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,115 | 999 | 3,068 | 2,759 | ||||||||||||
3,893 | 3,217 | 10,805 | 9,208 | |||||||||||||
Automotive experience |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
1,772 | 1,740 | 5,517 | 4,981 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
2,800 | 2,033 | 7,693 | 6,238 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
546 | 440 | 1,717 | 1,263 | ||||||||||||
5,118 | 4,213 | 14,927 | 12,482 | |||||||||||||
Power solutions |
1,353 | 1,110 | 4,313 | 3,575 | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 10,364 | $ | 8,540 | $ | 30,045 | $ | 25,265 | ||||||||
34
Segment Income | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Building efficiency |
||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 66 | $ | 61 | $ | 169 | $ | 144 | ||||||||
North America service |
35 | 25 | 69 | 50 | ||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
7 | 6 | 17 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
69 | 47 | 178 | 119 | ||||||||||||
Other |
30 | 51 | 45 | 67 | ||||||||||||
207 | 190 | 478 | 398 | |||||||||||||
Automotive experience |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
67 | 97 | 328 | 293 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
24 | 49 | 40 | 110 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
51 | 25 | 162 | 78 | ||||||||||||
142 | 171 | 530 | 481 | |||||||||||||
Power solutions |
163 | 135 | 558 | 450 | ||||||||||||
Total segment income |
$ | 512 | $ | 496 | $ | 1,566 | $ | 1,329 | ||||||||
Net financing charges |
(43 | ) | (39 | ) | (124 | ) | (117 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 469 | $ | 457 | $ | 1,442 | $ | 1,212 | ||||||||
35
36
37
38
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 10,364 | $ | 8,540 | 21 | % | $ | 30,045 | $ | 25,265 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
Segment income |
512 | 496 | 3 | % | 1,566 | 1,329 | 18 | % |
Three Months: |
| The $1.8 billion increase in consolidated net sales was primarily due to higher sales in the automotive experience business ($612 million) as a result of increased industry production levels by the Companys major original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers and current year business acquisitions, partially offset by the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events; the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($528 million); higher sales in the building efficiency businesses ($500 million) as a result of increased sales volumes across all segments; and higher sales in the power solutions business ($184 million) as a result of a prior year business acquisition and the impact of higher lead costs on pricing. | ||
| The $16 million increase in segment income was primarily due to higher volumes in the automotive experience and building efficiency businesses, favorable pricing and product mix net of lead and other commodity costs in the power solutions business, a warranty accrual adjustment due to favorable experience in the building efficiency other segment and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($28 million), partially offset by higher overall selling, general and administrative expenses, costs related to business acquisitions and unfavorable pricing in the automotive experience Europe segment, non-recurring charges related to South America indirect taxes in the building efficiency other segment, and the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events. |
Year-to-Date: |
| The $4.8 billion increase in consolidated net sales was primarily due to higher sales in the automotive experience business ($2.3 billion) as a result of increased industry production levels by our major OEM customers and current year business acquisitions, partially offset by the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events; higher sales in the building efficiency business ($1.4 billion) as a result of increased sales volumes across all segments; higher sales in the power solutions business ($718 million) as a result of increased sales volumes, a prior year business acquisition and the impact of higher lead costs on pricing; and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($427 million). | ||
| The $237 million increase in segment income was primarily due to higher volumes in the automotive experience, building efficiency and power solutions businesses, higher equity income in the automotive experience Asia segment, favorable pricing and product mix net of lead and other commodity costs in the power solutions business, a warranty accrual adjustment due to favorable experience in the building efficiency other segment and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($29 million), partially offset by higher overall selling, general and administrative expenses net of an automotive experience legal settlement award; costs related to business acquisitions, unfavorable commercial settlements and pricing, higher operating costs and unfavorable purchasing costs in the automotive experience Europe segment; non-recurring charges related to South America indirect taxes in the building efficiency other segment; and the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events. |
39
Net Sales | Net Sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 633 | $ | 551 | 15 | % | $ | 1,711 | $ | 1,552 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||
North America service |
601 | 531 | 13 | % | 1,639 | 1,505 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
1,046 | 787 | 33 | % | 3,053 | 2,404 | 27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia |
498 | 349 | 43 | % | 1,334 | 988 | 35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
1,115 | 999 | 12 | % | 3,068 | 2,759 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 3,893 | $ | 3,217 | 21 | % | $ | 10,805 | $ | 9,208 | 17 | % | |||||||||||||
| The increase in North America systems was primarily due to higher volumes of equipment and controls systems in the commercial construction and replacement markets ($79 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($3 million). | ||
| The increase in North America service was primarily due to higher volumes, mainly driven by energy solutions ($67 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($3 million). | ||
| The increase in global workplace solutions was primarily due to a net increase in services to new and existing customers ($183 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($76 million). | ||
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes of equipment and controls systems ($100 million), the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($28 million) and higher service volumes including the negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($21 million). | ||
| The increase in other was primarily due to the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($66 million) and higher volumes in Middle East ($65 million), Europe ($8 million), Latin America ($7 million) and other business areas ($7 million), partially offset by lower volumes in unitary products ($37 million). |
| The increase in North America systems was primarily due to higher volumes of equipment and controls systems in the commercial construction and replacement markets ($151 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($8 million). | ||
| The increase in North America service was primarily due to higher volumes, mainly driven by energy solutions ($114 million), incremental sales due to a prior year business acquisition ($12 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($8 million). | ||
| The increase in global workplace solutions was primarily due to a net increase in services to new and existing customers ($551 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($98 million). | ||
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes of equipment and controls systems ($219 million), the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($65 million) and higher service volumes including the negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($62 million). | ||
| The increase in other was primarily due to higher volumes in Middle East ($123 million), Latin America ($104 million), Europe ($35 million), unitary products ($7 million) and other business areas ($3 million), and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($37 million). |
40
Segment Income | Segment Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 66 | $ | 61 | 8 | % | $ | 169 | $ | 144 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
North America service |
35 | 25 | 40 | % | 69 | 50 | 38 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
7 | 6 | 17 | % | 17 | 18 | -6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia |
69 | 47 | 47 | % | 178 | 119 | 50 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
30 | 51 | -41 | % | 45 | 67 | -33 | % | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 207 | $ | 190 | 9 | % | $ | 478 | $ | 398 | 20 | % | |||||||||||||
| The increase in North America systems was primarily due to higher volumes ($17 million), partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($12 million). | ||
| The increase in North America service was primarily due to prior year information technology implementation costs ($15 million), higher volumes ($11 million) and lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($1 million), partially offset by unfavorable mix and margin rates ($18 million). | ||
| The increase in global workplace solutions was primarily due to higher volumes ($13 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($3 million), partially offset by unfavorable margin rates ($9 million) and higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($6 million). | ||
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes ($31 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($4 million), partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($11 million) and unfavorable margin rates ($1 million). | ||
| The decrease in other was primarily due to non-recurring charges related to South America indirect taxes ($29 million), higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($12 million), distribution business costs ($11 million) and unfavorable margin rates ($5 million), partially offset by a warranty accrual adjustment due to favorable experience ($20 million), higher volumes ($11 million), higher equity income ($4 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($1 million). |
| The increase in North America systems was primarily due to higher volumes ($30 million), favorable margin rates ($14 million) and prior year reserves for existing customers ($11 million), partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($29 million). | ||
| The increase in North America service was primarily due to prior year inventory adjustments and information technology implementation costs ($43 million), higher volumes ($24 million) and lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($9 million), partially offset by unfavorable mix and margin rates ($56 million). | ||
| The decrease in global workplace solutions was primarily due to unfavorable margin rates ($23 million) and higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($18 million), partially offset by higher volumes ($36 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($4 million). | ||
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes ($72 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($10 million), partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($22 million) and unfavorable margin rates ($1 million). | ||
| The decrease in other was primarily due to higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($45 million), non-recurring charges related to South America indirect taxes ($29 million), unfavorable margin |
41
rates ($24 million) and distribution business costs ($11 million), partially offset by higher volumes ($58 million), a warranty accrual adjustment due to favorable experience ($20 million), higher equity income ($8 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($1 million). |
Net Sales | Net Sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 1,772 | $ | 1,740 | 2 | % | $ | 5,517 | $ | 4,981 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||
Europe |
2,800 | 2,033 | 38 | % | 7,693 | 6,238 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia |
546 | 440 | 24 | % | 1,717 | 1,263 | 36 | % | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 5,118 | $ | 4,213 | 21 | % | $ | 14,927 | $ | 12,482 | 20 | % | |||||||||||||
| The increase in North America was primarily due to higher volumes to the Companys major OEM customers ($275 million) and net favorable commercial settlements and pricing ($13 million), partially offset by the negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($256 million). | ||
| The increase in Europe was primarily due to incremental sales due to business acquisitions ($351 million), the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($279 million), and higher volumes and new customer awards including the negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($161 million), partially offset by net unfavorable commercial settlements and pricing ($24 million). | ||
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes and new customer awards including the negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($92 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($14 million). |
| The increase in North America was primarily due to higher volumes to the Companys major OEM customers ($774 million) and net favorable commercial settlements and pricing ($18 million), partially offset by the negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($256 million). | ||
| The increase in Europe was primarily due to higher volumes and new customer awards including the negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($741 million), incremental sales due to business acquisitions ($606 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($152 million), partially offset by net unfavorable commercial settlements and pricing ($44 million). | ||
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes and new customer awards including the negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($415 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($39 million). |
42
Segment Income | Segment Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 67 | $ | 97 | -31 | % | $ | 328 | $ | 293 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
Europe |
24 | 49 | -51 | % | 40 | 110 | -64 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia |
51 | 25 | * | 162 | 78 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 142 | $ | 171 | -17 | % | $ | 530 | $ | 481 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||
* | Measure not meaningful |
| The decrease in North America was primarily due to the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($59 million), higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($23 million), higher engineering expenses ($9 million) and higher operating and purchasing costs ($3 million), partially offset by higher volumes ($50 million), net favorable commercial settlements and pricing ($12 million) and higher equity income ($2 million). | ||
| The decrease in Europe was primarily due to costs related to business acquisitions ($28 million), unfavorable pricing ($24 million), higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($24 million), higher engineering expenses ($9 million), higher operating costs ($4 million) and lower equity income ($2 million), partially offset by higher volumes including the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($31 million), operating income of current year acquisitions ($15 million), the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($14 million) and lower purchasing costs ($6 million). | ||
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes including the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($18 million), a prior year impairment charge on a headquarters building in Japan ($11 million), lower purchasing costs ($8 million), higher equity income mainly in China ($4 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($1 million), partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($8 million), unfavorable pricing ($6 million) and higher engineering expenses ($2 million). |
| The increase in North America was primarily due to higher volumes ($137 million), net favorable commercial settlements and pricing ($8 million), and lower operating and purchasing costs ($7 million), partially offset by the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($59 million), higher selling, general and administrative expenses net of a legal settlement award ($41 million), and higher engineering expenses ($17 million). | ||
| The decrease in Europe was primarily due to costs related to business acquisitions ($64 million), unfavorable commercial settlements and pricing ($57 million), higher operating costs ($38 million), higher engineering expenses ($38 million), higher purchasing costs ($24 million), higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($24 million) and lower equity income ($3 million), partially offset by higher volumes including the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($153 million), operating income of current year acquisitions ($15 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($10 million). | ||
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes including the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($67 million), higher equity income mainly in China ($28 million), lower purchasing costs ($11 million), a prior year impairment charge on a headquarters building in Japan ($11 million), lower operating costs ($7 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($2 |
43
million), partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($22 million), higher engineering expenses ($14 million) and unfavorable pricing ($6 million). |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 1,353 | $ | 1,110 | 22 | % | $ | 4,313 | $ | 3,575 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||
Segment income |
163 | 135 | 21 | % | 558 | 450 | 24 | % |
Three Months: | |||
| Net sales increased primarily due to sales associated with a prior year business acquisition ($81 million), the impact of higher lead costs on pricing ($78 million), the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($59 million) and favorable price/product mix ($33 million), partially offset by lower volumes including the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($8 million). | ||
| Segment income increased primarily due to favorable pricing and product mix net of lead and other commodity costs ($65 million), income associated with a prior year business acquisition ($8 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($5 million), partially offset by higher operating and transportation costs ($26 million), higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($20 million), lower sales volumes ($2 million) and lower equity income ($2 million). | ||
Year-to-Date: | |||
| Net sales increased primarily due to sales associated with a prior year business acquisition ($231 million), higher sales volumes including the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($226 million), the impact of higher lead costs on pricing ($204 million), favorable price/product mix ($57 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($20 million). | ||
| Segment income increased primarily due to favorable pricing and product mix net of lead and other commodity costs ($88 million), higher sales volumes ($57 million), income associated with a prior year business acquisition ($24 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($2 million), partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($40 million) and higher operating and transportation costs ($22 million). |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net financing charges |
$ | 43 | $ | 39 | 10 | % | $ | 124 | $ | 117 | 6 | % |
| The increase in net financing charges for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to higher debt levels in the current periods. |
44
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Tax provision |
$ | 89 | $ | 31 | $ | 274 | $ | 123 | ||||||||
Effective tax rate |
19.0 | % | 6.8 | % | 19.0 | % | 10.2 | % | ||||||||
Estimated annual base effective tax rate |
19.0 | % | 18.0 | % | 19.0 | % | 18.0 | % |
| In calculating the provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimate of the annual effective tax rate based upon the facts and circumstances known at each interim period. On a quarterly basis, the annual effective tax rate is adjusted, as appropriate, based upon changed facts and circumstances, if any, as compared to those forecasted at the beginning of the fiscal year and each interim period thereafter. |
| In the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets within a Slovakia automotive entity would be utilized. Therefore, the Company released $13 million of valuation allowances in the three month period ended June 30, 2010. |
| Based on published case law in a non-U.S. jurisdiction and the settlement of a tax audit during the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company released net $38 million of reserves for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties. |
| In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded a noncash charge of approximately $18 million due to law changes related to the tax treatment of the Medicare Part D subsidy due to passage of comprehensive health care reform legislation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (HR3590). |
| In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets in Brazil would be utilized. Therefore, the Company released $69 million of valuation allowances. This was comprised of a $93 million decrease in income tax expense offset by a $24 million reduction in cumulative translation adjustments. |
| As a result of certain events related to prior year tax planning initiatives, during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company increased the reserve for uncertain tax positions by $31 million, including $26 million of interest and penalties, which impacted the effective tax rate. |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
$ | 23 | $ | 8 | * | $ | 82 | $ | 47 | 74 | % |
* | Measure not meaningful |
| The increase in income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to higher earnings at an automotive experience partially-owned affiliate in North America. The increase in income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the nine month period ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to improved earnings at certain automotive experience partially-owned affiliates in North America and Asia and a power solutions partially-owned affiliate. |
45
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
Johnson Controls, Inc. |
$ | 357 | $ | 418 | -15 | % | $ | 1,086 | $ | 1,042 | 4 | % |
| The decrease in net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to higher overall selling, general and administrative expenses, costs related to business acquisitions and unfavorable pricing in the automotive experience Europe segment, non-recurring charges related to South America indirect taxes in the building efficiency other segment, the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events, higher provision for income taxes and higher income attributable to noncontrolling interests, partially offset by higher volumes in the automotive experience and building efficiency businesses, favorable pricing and product mix net of lead and other commodity costs in the power solutions business, a warranty accrual adjustment due to favorable experience in the building efficiency other segment and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation. |
| The increase in net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to higher volumes in the automotive experience, building efficiency and power solutions businesses, higher equity income in the automotive experience Asia segment, favorable pricing and product mix net of lead and other commodity costs in the power solutions business, a warranty accrual adjustment due to favorable experience in the building efficiency other segment and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation, partially offset by higher overall selling, general and administrative expenses net of an automotive experience legal settlement award; costs related to business acquisitions, unfavorable commercial settlements and pricing, higher operating costs and unfavorable purchasing costs in the automotive experience Europe segment; non-recurring charges related to South America indirect taxes in the building efficiency other segment; the negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events; higher provision for income taxes; and higher income attributable to noncontrolling interests. |
June 30, | September 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2010 | Change | |||||||||||||||
Working capital |
$ | 1,726 | $ | 919 | 88 | % | $ | 905 | 91 | % | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
7,094 | 6,095 | 16 | % | 5,452 | 30 | % | |||||||||||||
Inventories |
2,451 | 1,786 | 37 | % | 1,644 | 49 | % | |||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
6,104 | 5,426 | 12 | % | 4,874 | 25 | % |
| The Company defines working capital as current assets less current liabilities, excluding cash, short-term debt, the current portion of long-term debt and net assets of discontinued operations. Management believes that this measure of working capital, which excludes financing-related items and discontinued activities, provides a more useful measurement of the Companys operating performance. |
46
| The increase in working capital as compared to September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 was primarily due to higher accounts receivable from higher sales, higher inventory levels to support higher sales and current year acquisitions, partially offset by higher accounts payable due to increased purchasing activity. | |
| The Companys days sales in accounts receivable for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were 55, compared to 54 and 53 for the comparable periods ended September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively. The increase in accounts receivable compared to September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 was primarily due to higher sales volumes in the current quarter compared to the comparable prior quarters. There has been no significant adverse change in the level of overdue receivables or changes in revenue recognition methods. | |
| The Companys inventory turns for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were lower than the comparable periods ended September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 primarily due to higher inventory production to meet increased demand. | |
| Days in accounts payable at June 30, 2011 were 69 days, a decrease from 74 days at September 30, 2010 and 70 days at June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the timing of supplier payments. |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 393 | $ | 427 | $ | 561 | $ | 1,448 | ||||||||
Cash used by investing activities |
(916 | ) | (285 | ) | (2,151 | ) | (655 | ) | ||||||||
Cash provided (used) by financing activities |
463 | (83 | ) | 1,357 | (801 | ) | ||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(365 | ) | (215 | ) | (900 | ) | (526 | ) |
| The decrease in cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to lower net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. and unfavorable working capital changes in inventory and accounts payable, partially offset by favorable working capital changes in accounts receivable and accrued income taxes. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, the decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to unfavorable working capital changes in accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable, partially offset by higher net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. and favorable working capital changes in accrued income taxes. | |
| The increase in cash used by investing activities for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to higher capital expenditures and acquisitions of businesses. | |
| The increase in cash provided by financing activities for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to an increase in overall debt levels. Refer to Note 11, Debt and Financing Arrangements, to the financial statements for further discussion. | |
| The increase in capital expenditures for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 primarily relates to capacity increases and vertical integration efforts in the power solutions business, increased investments to support the Companys customers growth and to enhance the Companys strategic footprint primarily in Mexico and Southeast Asia, and standardization of information technology infrastructure in the automotive experience business. |
47
48
June 30, | September 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | 2010 | Change | |||||||||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 5,176 | $ | 3,389 | 53 | % | $ | 3,365 | 54 | % | ||||||||||
Shareholders equity
attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
11,361 | 10,071 | 13 | % | 9,395 | 21 | % | |||||||||||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 16,537 | $ | 13,460 | 23 | % | $ | 12,760 | 30 | % | ||||||||||
Total debt as a % of
total capitalization |
31 | % | 25 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||
| The Company believes the percentage of total debt to total capitalization is useful to understanding the Companys financial condition as it provides a review of the extent to which the Company relies on external debt financing for its funding and is a measure of risk to its shareholders. | |
| In fiscal 2008, the Company entered into new committed, revolving credit facilities totaling 350 million euro with 100 million euro expiring in May 2009, 150 million euro expiring in May 2011 and 100 million euro expiring in August 2011. In May 2009, the 100 million euro revolving facility expired and the Company entered into a new one year, committed, revolving credit facility in the amount of 50 million euro expiring in May 2010. In May 2010, the 50 million euro revolving facility expired and the Company entered into a new one year, committed, revolving facility in the amount of 50 million euro expiring in May 2011. As of June 30, 2011, only the original 100 million euro revolving credit facility remains. There were no draws outstanding on this facility as of June 30, 2011. | |
| In December 2009, the Company retired its 7 billion yen, three year, floating rate loan agreement that was scheduled to mature on January 18, 2011. The Company used cash to repay the note. |
49
| In December 2009, the Company retired its 12 billion yen, three year, floating rate loan agreement that matured. The Company used cash to repay the note. | |
| In December 2009, the Company retired approximately $13 million in principal amount of its fixed rate notes that was scheduled to mature on January 15, 2011. The Company used cash to fund the repurchase. | |
| In February 2010, the Company retired approximately $30 million in principal amount of its fixed rate notes that was scheduled to mature on January 15, 2011. The Company used cash to fund the repurchase. | |
| In February 2010, the Company retired its 18 billion yen, three year, floating rate loan agreement that was scheduled to mature on January 18, 2011. The Company used cash to repay the note. | |
| In March 2010, the Company issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2020. Net proceeds from the issue were used for general corporate purposes including the retirement of short-term debt. | |
| In March 2010, the Company retired approximately $31 million in principal amount of its fixed rate notes that was scheduled to mature on January 15, 2011. The Company used cash to fund the repurchase. | |
| In May 2010, the Company retired approximately $18 million in principal amount of its fixed rate notes scheduled to mature on January 15, 2011. The Company used cash to fund the repurchases. | |
| In September 2010, the Company entered into a new, $100 million committed revolving facility scheduled to mature in December 2011. In February 2011, the Company retired the committed facility. There were no draws on the facility. | |
| In November 2010, the Company repaid debt of $82 million which was acquired as part of an acquisition in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company used cash to repay the debt. | |
| In January 2011, the Company retired $654 million in principal amount, plus accrued interest, of its 5.25% fixed rate notes that matured on January 15, 2011. The Company used cash to fund the payment. | |
| In February 2011, the Company issued $350 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate senior unsecured notes due in fiscal 2014, $450 million aggregate principal amount of 1.75% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2014, $500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.25% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2021 and $300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.70% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2041. Aggregate net proceeds of $1.6 billion from the issues were used for general corporate purposes including the retirement of short-term debt. | |
| In February 2011, the Company entered into a 6-year, 100 million euro, floating rate loan scheduled to mature in February 2017. Proceeds from the facility were used for general corporate purposes. | |
| In February 2011, the Company replaced its $2.05 billion committed five-year credit facility, scheduled to mature in December 2011, with a $2.5 billion committed four-year credit facility scheduled to mature in February 2015. The facility is used to support the Companys outstanding commercial paper. At June 30, 2011, there were no draws on the facility. | |
| In April 2011, a total of 157,820 equity units, which had a purchase contract settlement date of March 31, 2012, were early exercised. As a result, the Company issued 766,673 shares of Johnson Controls, Inc. common stock and approximately $8 million of 11.50% notes due 2042. | |
| The Company also selectively makes use of short-term credit lines. The Company estimates that, as of June 30, 2011, it could borrow up to $1.8 billion at its current debt ratings on committed credit lines. | |
| The Company believes its capital resources and liquidity position at June 30, 2011 are adequate to meet projected needs. The Company believes requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, dividends, minimum pension contributions, debt maturities, announced acquisitions and any other potential acquisitions in fiscal 2011 will continue to be funded from operations, supplemented by short- and long-term borrowings, if required. The Company currently manages its short-term debt position in the U.S. and euro commercial paper markets and bank loan markets. In the event the Company is unable to issue commercial paper, it would have the ability to draw on its $2.5 billion revolving credit facility, which matures in February 2015. There were no |
50
draws on the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2011. As such, the Company believes it has sufficient financial resources to fund operations and meet its obligations for the foreseeable future. | ||
| The Companys debt financial covenants require a minimum consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. of at least $3.5 billion at all times and allow a maximum aggregated amount of 10% of consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. for liens and pledges. For purposes of calculating the Companys covenants, consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. is calculated without giving effect to (i) the application of ASC 715-60, Defined Benefit Plans- Other Postretirement, or (ii) the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment. As of June 30, 2011, consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. as defined per the Companys debt financial covenants was $10.6 billion and there were no outstanding amounts for liens and pledges. The Company expects to remain in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in its credit agreements and indentures for the foreseeable future. None of the Companys debt agreements limit access to stated borrowing levels or require accelerated repayment in the event of a decrease in the Companys credit rating. |
51
52
53
54
Approximate Dollar | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Value of Shares that | |||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased as | May Yet be | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Average Price | Part of the Publicly | Purchased under the | |||||||||||||
Period | Shares Purchased | Paid per Share | Announced Program | Programs | ||||||||||||
4/1/11 - 4/30/11 |
||||||||||||||||
Purchases by Company (1) |
| | | $ | 102,394,713 | |||||||||||
5/1/11 - 5/31/11 |
||||||||||||||||
Purchases by Company (1) |
| | | $ | 102,394,713 | |||||||||||
6/1/11 - 6/30/11 |
||||||||||||||||
Purchases by Company (1) |
| | | $ | 102,394,713 | |||||||||||
4/1/11 - 4/30/11 |
||||||||||||||||
Purchases by Citibank |
| | | NA | ||||||||||||
5/1/11 - 5/31/11 |
||||||||||||||||
Purchases by Citibank |
| | | NA | ||||||||||||
6/1/11 - 6/30/11 |
||||||||||||||||
Purchases by Citibank |
| | | NA |
(1) | The repurchases of the Companys common stock by the Company are intended to partially offset dilution related to our stock option and restricted stock equity compensation plans and are treated as repurchases of Company common stock for purposes of this disclosure. |
55
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. |
||||
Date: August 3, 2011 | By: | /s/ R. Bruce McDonald | ||
R. Bruce McDonald | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
56
Exhibit No. | Description | |
15
|
Letter of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated August 3, 2011, relating to Financial Information. | |
31.1
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101
|
The following materials from Johnson Controls, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, furnished herewith. |
57