defm14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
United Defense Industries, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
o No
fee required.
þ Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of United Defense Industries (UDI common stock)
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
51,215,251 shares of UDI common stock; 2,498,532 options to purchase shares
of UDI common stock, all as of February 28, 2005.
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other
underlying value of
transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the
amount on which the filing
fee is calculated and state
how it was determined): |
The filing fee was determined by multiplying 0.0001177 by the sum of:
(a) |
the product of $75.00 and 51,215,251 (outstanding shares of UDI common stock), plus |
|
(b) |
the product of $53.33 (equal to $75.00 minus $21.67, the
weighted average per share exercise price of outstanding
options to purchase shares of UDI common stock, which
pursuant to the merger agreement are to be cancelled at the
effective time for the applicable spread) and 2,498,532 (the
aggregate number of shares of UDI common stock subject to
such options). |
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
$3,974,390,537
$467,786
þ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
(3) |
Filing Party: |
|
|
(4) |
Date Filed: |
1525 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 700
Arlington, VA 22209
(703) 312-6100
2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
MERGER PROPOSED YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
April 6, 2005
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2005 annual meeting of
stockholders of United Defense Industries, Inc., or UDI, which
will be held at the Hyatt Regency Crystal City,
2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202 on
May 10, 2005 at 11:00 a.m. local time.
On March 6, 2005, we entered into a merger agreement with
BAE Systems North America Inc., or BAE Systems, providing for
the acquisition by BAE Systems of all the outstanding shares of
our common stock for a price of $75.00 per share in cash,
without interest. At the annual meeting, we will ask you to
adopt this merger agreement, among other matters.
After careful consideration, our board of directors has
unanimously (with one director not participating) determined
that the merger is advisable and fair to, and in the best
interests of, UDI and its stockholders and recommends that you
vote FOR adoption of the merger agreement.
The accompanying document provides a detailed description of the
proposed merger and the merger agreement. We urge you to read
the enclosed materials carefully. If you have any questions or
need assistance, please call our proxy solicitor, MacKenzie
Partners, Inc. at (800) 322-2885 (toll-free) or
(212) 929-5500 (collect). In lieu of our traditional annual
report to stockholders, a copy of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
accompanies this proxy statement. In addition, you may obtain
information about us from the documents that we have filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Your vote is very important. Because adoption of the
merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of
a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock
entitled to vote at the annual meeting, a failure to vote will
have the same effect as a vote against adoption of the merger
agreement.
Whether or not you are able to attend the annual meeting in
person, please complete, sign, and date the enclosed proxy card
and return it in the postage prepaid envelope provided as soon
as possible. Giving your proxy will not limit your right to
vote in person if you wish to attend the annual meeting and vote
in person.
Thank you for your cooperation and your continued support.
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Rabaut |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS DATED APRIL 6, 2005 AND IS FIRST
BEING MAILED TO
STOCKHOLDERS ON OR ABOUT APRIL 7, 2005.
1525 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 700
Arlington, VA 22209
(703) 312-6100
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on May 10, 2005
To the Stockholders of United Defense Industries, Inc.:
Notice is hereby given that the 2005 annual meeting of
stockholders of United Defense Industries, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, or UDI, will be held at the Hyatt Regency Crystal
City, 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia
22202 on May 10, 2005 at 11:00 a.m. local time for the
following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated as of March 6, 2005, among UDI, BAE
Systems North America Inc., a Delaware corporation, or BAE
Systems, and Ute Acquisition Company Inc., a Delaware
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of BAE Systems, or
Acquisition Sub, pursuant to which, upon the merger becoming
effective: |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Sub will be merged with and into UDI with UDI
continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of BAE Systems, and |
|
|
|
each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of
UDI issued and outstanding immediately prior to the merger
becoming effective (other than shares owned by UDI, BAE Systems,
or Acquisition Sub, or any of their wholly owned subsidiaries),
will be converted into the right to receive $75.00 in cash,
without interest; |
|
|
|
|
|
to elect nine directors to serve on our board of directors; |
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the annual
meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in favor of
adoption of the merger agreement; and |
|
|
|
to consider such other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
Only holders of record of our common stock as of the close of
business on March 21, 2005 will be entitled to notice of,
and to vote at, the annual meeting and at any adjournments or
postponements thereof. The affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled
to vote at the annual meeting is required to adopt the merger
agreement.
Under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
holders of our common stock who do not vote in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement will have the right to seek
appraisal of the fair value of their shares as determined by the
Delaware Court of Chancery if the merger is completed, but only
if they submit a written demand for an appraisal prior to the
vote on the merger agreement and if they comply with the
procedures under the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware explained in the accompanying proxy statement. See
The Merger Appraisal Rights.
The UDI board of directors recommends that stockholders vote
FOR adoption of the merger agreement.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
David V. Kolovat |
|
Secretary |
Arlington, Virginia
April 6, 2005
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
Whether or not you are able to attend the annual meeting in
person, please complete, sign, and date the enclosed proxy card
and return it in the postage prepaid envelope provided as soon
as possible. Giving your proxy will not affect your right to
attend the meeting and vote in person.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Proposed Transaction
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the Merger will be Completed
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companies
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opinions of Our Financial Advisors
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matters to be Considered
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Annual Meeting
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
to Our U.S. Stockholders
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Shares; Procedures For Exchange of Certificates
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment of Stock Options and Restricted Stock
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Seeking Appraisal
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conditions to the Merger
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Solicitation of Other Offers; Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination of the Merger Agreement
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination Fee
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF OUR STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date, Time, Place, and Purpose of Annual meeting
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Entitled to Vote; Record Date
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote Required; Quorum
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting by Proxy
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revocability of Proxies
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solicitation of Proxies
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Business
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjournments and Postponements
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
THE COMPANIES
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Defense Industries, Inc.
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAE Systems North America Inc.
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ute Acquisition Company Inc.
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
THE MERGER
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Background of the Merger
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Reasons for the Merger
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opinion of Our Financial Advisors JPMorgan and
Lehman Brothers
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Condition
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
to Our U.S. Stockholders
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appraisal Rights
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of the Merger
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Shares; Procedures for Exchange of Certificates
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structure and Effective Time of the Merger
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Officers
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment of Stock Options and Restricted Stock
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Seeking Appraisal
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for the Shares
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efforts to Complete the Merger
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conditions to the Merger
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Meeting; Proxy Statement
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAE Parent Letter
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Solicitation of Other Offers; Adverse Recommendation Change;
Termination to Accept a Superior Proposal
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination of the Merger Agreement
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination Fee
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indemnification Obligations
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Obligations
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment, Extension and Waiver
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors and Committees
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreements
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Graph
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationship with Independent Public Accountants
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and Services of Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
MULTIPLE STOCKHOLDERS SHARING ONE ADDRESS
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE
INFORMATION
|
|
|
65 |
|
ANNEX A Merger Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEX B Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEX C Opinion of Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEX D Section 262 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEX E Charter of the Audit and Ethics Committee of
the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
ii
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
The following questions and answers are intended to address
briefly some commonly asked questions regarding the merger and
the annual meeting. These questions and answers may not address
all questions that may be important to you as a stockholder.
Please refer to the more detailed information contained
elsewhere in this proxy statement, the annexes to this proxy
statement and the documents referred to in this proxy
statement.
In this proxy statement, the terms we,
us, our, our company, and
UDI refer to United Defense Industries, Inc. The
term BAE Systems refers to BAE Systems North America
Inc. The term Acquisition Sub refers to Ute
Acquisition Company Inc.
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What is the proposed transaction? |
|
A. |
|
The proposed transaction provides for the acquisition of UDI by
BAE Systems. The proposed transaction would be accomplished
through a merger of Acquisition Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary
of BAE Systems, with and into UDI, with UDI surviving, which we
refer to as the merger. As a result of the merger: |
|
|
|
UDI will become a wholly owned subsidiary of BAE
Systems, |
|
|
|
our common stock will cease to be listed on the New
York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, and will no longer be publicly
traded, and |
|
|
|
each outstanding share of our common stock (other
than shares owned by UDI, BAE Systems, or Acquisition Sub, or
any of their wholly owned subsidiaries) will be converted into
the right to receive $75.00 in cash, without interest. |
|
Q. |
|
What is the purpose of the annual meeting? |
|
A. |
|
At the annual meeting we will be asking our stockholders to
adopt the agreement and plan of merger among BAE Systems,
Acquisition Sub, and UDI, which we refer to as the merger
agreement, pursuant to which the merger will occur. We will also
be asking our stockholders to elect nine directors to serve on
our board of directors and to approve the adjournment, if
necessary, of the annual meeting. |
|
Q. |
|
Where and when is the annual meeting? |
|
A. |
|
The annual meeting will take place at the Hyatt Regency Crystal
City, 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia
22202 on May 10, 2005 at 11:00 a.m. local time. |
|
Q. |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting? |
|
A. |
|
Only holders of record of our common stock as of the close of
business on March 21, 2005 are entitled to receive notice
of the annual meeting and to vote the shares of our common stock
that they held on that date at the annual meeting, or at any
adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting. As of the
close of business on March 21, 2005, 50,846,626 shares
of our common stock were outstanding. |
|
Q. |
|
What vote of stockholders is required to adopt the merger
agreement? |
|
A. |
|
Adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote
of stockholders holding a majority of the outstanding shares of
our common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Each
share of our common stock is entitled to one vote. |
|
Q. |
|
How does the board of directors recommend that I vote? |
|
A. |
|
Our board of directors unanimously (with one director not
participating) recommends that our stockholders vote FOR
adoption of the merger agreement. You should read The
Merger Our Reasons for the Merger for a
discussion of the factors that our board of directors considered
in deciding to recommend adoption of the merger agreement. |
|
Q. |
|
What other matters am I being asked to vote on? |
|
A. |
|
In addition to the adoption of the merger agreement, we will
also be asking you to elect nine directors to serve on our board
of directors, to approve a proposal to adjourn the annual
meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in favor of
adoption of the merger agreement, and to approve any other
matters that may properly come before the annual meeting. |
1
|
|
|
Q. |
|
If the merger is completed, what will I receive for my shares
of UDI common stock? |
|
A. |
|
In the merger, each share of our common stock that is issued and
outstanding (other than shares owned by UDI, BAE Systems, or
Acquisition Sub, or any of their wholly owned subsidiaries) will
be converted into the right to receive $75.00 in cash, without
interest, which we refer to as the merger consideration. As a
result of the merger, upon the surrender of your stock
certificate(s), you will receive a total amount equal to the
product obtained by multiplying the merger consideration by the
number of shares of our common stock that you own. In the event
of a transfer of ownership of common stock that is not
registered in the records of our transfer agent, the merger
consideration may, subject to certain requirements, be paid to a
person other than the person in whose name the certificate so
surrendered is registered. See The Merger
Conversion of Shares; Procedures for Exchange of
Certificates. |
|
Q. |
|
Will the merger consideration I receive in the merger
increase if the results of operations of UDI improve or if the
price of UDI common stock increases above $75.00 per
share? |
|
A. |
|
No. The value of the merger consideration is fixed. The
merger agreement does not contain any provision that would
adjust the merger consideration based on fluctuations in the
price of our common stock, the amount of working capital we hold
at the consummation of the merger, or improvements in our
results of operations prior to the consummation of the merger. |
|
Q. |
|
Is the merger subject to the fulfillment of certain
conditions? |
|
A. |
|
Yes. Before completion of the merger, UDI, BAE Systems, and
Acquisition Sub must fulfill or waive the closing conditions
contained in the merger agreement. If these conditions are not
satisfied or waived, the merger will not be completed. See
The Merger Agreement Conditions to the
Merger. |
|
Q. |
|
Am I entitled to appraisal rights? |
|
A. |
|
Yes. You are entitled to appraisal rights under the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which we refer to as
the DGCL, in connection with the merger. See The
Merger Appraisal Rights. |
|
Q. |
|
What happens if a third party makes an offer to acquire UDI
before the merger is completed? |
|
A. |
|
Prior to the adoption of the merger agreement by our
stockholders, our board of directors may, subject to certain
requirements and rights of BAE Systems under the merger
agreement, terminate the merger agreement in order to enter into
a superior acquisition agreement with a third party
contemplating the acquisition of UDI if our board of directors
determines in good faith after consultation with a financial
advisor of nationally recognized reputation that the
consideration payable to our stockholders under that superior
acquisition agreement has a higher value than the consideration
to be received by our stockholders in the merger and that the
transaction contemplated by the superior acquisition agreement
is reasonably capable of being completed. See The
Merger Agreement Termination of the Merger
Agreement. In the event that our board of directors
terminates the merger agreement in order for UDI to enter into a
superior acquisition agreement with a third party, as well as in
certain other circumstances, we would be obligated to pay BAE
Systems a termination fee of $119,233,768. See The
Merger Agreement Termination Fee. |
|
Q. |
|
When is the merger expected to be completed? |
|
A. |
|
We expect the merger to occur in the second quarter of 2005 as
soon as possible after all the conditions to the merger are
satisfied or waived. In order to complete the merger, we must
obtain stockholder approval and satisfy the other closing
conditions under the merger agreement. |
|
Q. |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A. |
|
After carefully reading and considering the information
contained in this proxy statement, including its annexes, please
complete, sign, and date the enclosed proxy card and return it
in the postage prepaid envelope provided as soon as possible. |
|
Q. |
|
May I vote in person? |
|
A. |
|
Yes. You may attend the annual meeting and vote your shares in
person rather than by signing and returning your proxy card. If
you wish to vote in person and your shares are held by a broker
or other nominee, you need to obtain a proxy from the broker
authorizing you to vote your shares held in the brokers
name. |
2
|
|
|
Q. |
|
May I vote via the Internet or telephone? |
|
A. |
|
Yes, if your shares are held through a broker or bank and such a
service is provided by your broker or bank, you may vote by
completing and returning the voting form provided by your broker
or bank or via the Internet or by telephone through your broker
or bank. To vote via the Internet or telephone, you should
follow the instructions on the voting form provided by your
broker or bank. If your shares are registered in your name, you
may only vote by returning a signed proxy card or voting in
person at the annual meeting, and you will not be able to vote
via the Internet or telephone. |
|
Q. |
|
What happens if I do not vote? |
|
A. |
|
Because the required vote of our stockholders to adopt the
merger agreement is based upon the total number of outstanding
shares of our common stock, rather than upon the shares actually
voted, the failure to return your proxy card or to otherwise
vote will have the same effect as voting AGAINST adoption of the
merger agreement. Failure to vote or voting to abstain will have
no effect on approval of the other matters being considered at
the annual meeting. If you return a properly signed proxy card
but do not indicate how you want to vote, your proxy will be
counted as a vote FOR adoption of the merger agreement, FOR
approval of any proposal to adjourn the annual meeting to
solicit additional proxies in favor of adoption of the merger
agreement, and FOR the election of the nine director nominees
named in this proxy statement to serve on our board of directors. |
|
Q. |
|
If my shares are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker vote my shares for me? |
|
A. |
|
Yes, but your broker will only be permitted to vote your shares
of UDI common stock on the adoption of the merger agreement and
the proposal to adjourn the annual meeting if you instruct your
broker how to vote. Your broker may have authority under the
rules of the NYSE to vote your shares of UDI common stock on the
election of directors even if you do not instruct your broker
how to vote. You should follow the procedures provided to you by
your broker regarding how to instruct your broker to vote your
shares. |
|
Q. |
|
Should I send in my stock certificates now? |
|
A. |
|
No. After the merger is completed, you will be sent
detailed instructions informing you how to send in your stock
certificates in order to receive the merger consideration. You
will receive the merger consideration as soon as practicable
after receipt by the paying agent for the merger consideration
of your stock certificates, together with the completed
documents required in the instructions. Do not send any stock
certificates with your proxy. |
|
Q. |
|
Will I owe taxes as a result of the merger? |
|
A. |
|
Generally, the merger will be a taxable transaction for
U.S. holders of our common stock. As a result, assuming you
are a U.S. holder, any gain you recognize as a result of
the merger will be subject to United States federal income tax
and also may be taxed under applicable state, local, and other
tax laws. In general, you will recognize gain or loss equal to
the difference between (1) the amount of cash you receive
and (2) the adjusted tax basis of your shares of our common
stock converted in the merger. See The
Merger Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Merger to Our
U.S. Stockholders for a more detailed explanation
of the tax consequences of the merger. You should consult your
tax advisor on how specific tax consequences of the merger apply
to you. |
|
Q. |
|
Where can I find more information about UDI? |
|
A. |
|
We file periodic reports and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the
SEC. You may read and copy this information at the SECs
public reference facility. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330
for information about this facility. This information is also
available on the internet site maintained by the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov. For a more detailed description of the
information available, please refer to the section entitled
Where You Can Find More Information. |
|
Q. |
|
Who can help answer my questions? |
|
A. |
|
If you have questions about the annual meeting or the merger
after reading this proxy statement, or would like additional
copies of this proxy statement or the proxy card, you should
contact MacKenzie Partners, Inc. at (800) 322-2885
(toll-free) or (212) 929-5500 (collect). |
3
SUMMARY
This summary highlights important information in this proxy
statement. Because this summary may not contain all of the
information that is important to you, you should carefully read
this entire proxy statement and the other documents to which
this proxy statement refers you for a more complete
understanding of the merger, including, in particular, the copy
of the merger agreement, the opinion of J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. and the opinion of Lehman Brothers Inc. that are
attached to this proxy statement as Annexes A, B, and C,
respectively.
The Proposed Transaction
The proposed transaction provides for the acquisition of UDI by
BAE Systems. The proposed transaction would be accomplished
through a merger of Acquisition Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary
of BAE Systems, with and into UDI, with UDI surviving, which we
refer to as the merger. As a result of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
UDI will become a wholly owned subsidiary of BAE Systems, |
|
|
|
our common stock will cease to be listed on the NYSE and will no
longer be publicly traded, and |
|
|
|
each outstanding share of our common stock (other than shares
owned by UDI, BAE Systems, or Acquisition Sub, or any of their
wholly owned subsidiaries) will be converted into the right to
receive $75.00 in cash, without interest. |
When the Merger will be Completed
We are working to complete the merger as quickly as possible. We
currently expect to complete the merger in the second quarter of
2005 as soon as possible after all the conditions to the merger
are satisfied or waived.
The Companies
|
|
|
United Defense Industries, Inc. (page 14) |
UDI is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia. UDI designs,
develops, and produces combat vehicles, artillery systems, naval
guns, missile launchers, and precision munitions used by the
U.S. Department of Defense and allies worldwide, and
provides non-nuclear ship repair, modernization, and conversion
services to the U.S. Navy and other U.S. government
agencies.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1525 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, Virginia 22209, and our
telephone number is (703) 312-6100.
|
|
|
BAE Systems North America Inc. (page 14) |
BAE Systems is headquartered in Rockville, Maryland. BAE Systems
is a wholly owned subsidiary of BAE Systems plc, a public
limited company incorporated in England and Wales, also referred
to in this proxy statement as BAE Parent. BAE Systems is a
leading electronics, information systems, and technology
services company, and one of the largest providers of systems
and services for the U.S. Department of Defense. BAE
Systems currently employs approximately 30,000 people across
some 30 states, generating sales of more than
$5 billion. BAE Systems designs, develops, manufactures,
and supports a wide range of advanced aerospace products,
electronic systems, and information technology for the
U.S. government and commercial customers.
BAE Systems principal executive offices are located at
1601 Research Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland 20850, and its
telephone number is (301) 838-6000.
|
|
|
Ute Acquisition Company Inc. (page 14) |
Acquisition Sub is a Delaware corporation organized in
connection with the merger and to date has engaged in no
activities other than those incidental to its formation and the
consummation of the merger. Acquisition Sub is a wholly owned
subsidiary of BAE Systems. The mailing address of Acquisition
Subs principal executive offices is 1601 Research
Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland 20850, and its telephone number
is (301) 838-6000.
4
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors (page 22)
After careful consideration, our board of directors unanimously
(with one director not participating):
|
|
|
|
|
determined that the terms of the merger, the merger agreement,
and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement
are fair to, and in the best interest of, our stockholders; |
|
|
|
approved the merger and the merger agreement and declared the
merger and the merger agreement advisable; and |
|
|
|
recommended that our stockholders adopt the merger agreement. |
For a discussion of the material factors considered by our board
of directors in reaching its conclusion, see The
Merger Our Reasons for the Merger.
Opinions of Our Financial Advisors
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (page 22) |
On March 6, 2005, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., or
JPMorgan, rendered its oral opinion to our board of directors,
which was subsequently confirmed in writing, that, as of
March 6, 2005, and based upon and subject to the
assumptions made, matters considered, and limits of the review
undertaken by JPMorgan, the merger consideration was fair, from
a financial point of view, to the holders of our common stock.
The full text of the written opinion of JPMorgan, dated
March 6, 2005, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered, and limits of the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached as
Annex B to this proxy statement. You are encouraged to read
the opinion carefully in its entirety. JPMorgan provided its
opinion for the information and assistance of our board of
directors in connection with its consideration of the merger.
The JPMorgan opinion is not an opinion or recommendation as to
how you should vote with respect to the merger agreement.
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers Inc. (page 23) |
On March 6, 2005, Lehman Brothers Inc., or Lehman Brothers,
rendered its oral opinion to our board of directors, which was
subsequently confirmed in writing, that, as of March 6,
2005, and based upon and subject to the assumptions made,
matters considered, and limits of the review undertaken by
Lehman Brothers, the merger consideration was fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of our common stock.
The full text of the written opinion of Lehman Brothers, dated
March 6, 2005, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered, and limits of the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached as
Annex C to this proxy statement. You are encouraged to read
the opinion carefully in its entirety. Lehman Brothers provided
its opinion for the information and assistance of our board of
directors in connection with its consideration of the merger.
The Lehman Brothers opinion is not an opinion or recommendation
as to how you should vote with respect to the merger agreement.
Matters to be Considered (page 11)
You will be asked to adopt the merger agreement. We will also be
asking you to elect nine directors to serve on our board of
directors, to approve the adjournment, if necessary, of the
annual meeting to solicit proxies in favor of adoption of the
merger agreement, and to approve any other matters that may
properly come before the annual meeting.
The Annual Meeting (page 11)
|
|
|
|
|
Date, Time, and Place (page 11) |
The annual meeting will be held on May 10, 2005 at 11:00
a.m. local time at the Hyatt Regency Crystal City,
2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202.
|
|
|
|
|
Record Date and Voting (page 11) |
If you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business
on March 21, 2005, the record date for the annual meeting,
you are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the annual
meeting. As of the close of
5
business on March 21, 2005, there were
50,846,626 shares of our common stock outstanding and
entitled to be voted at the annual meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
Required Vote (page 11) |
Adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our
common stock entitled to vote. Failure to vote by proxy or in
person will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST adoption
of the merger agreement.
With respect to the other matters being considered at the annual
meeting, the director nominees receiving the highest number of
votes will be elected to our board of directors and the approval
of the adjournment proposal requires the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock voting
in person or by proxy at the annual meeting.
Holders of at least a majority of the shares of our common stock
issued and outstanding as of the record date and entitled to
vote at the annual meeting must be present in person or
represented by proxy at the annual meeting to constitute a
quorum to conduct business at the annual meeting. In the event
that a quorum is not present in person or by proxy at the annual
meeting, we currently expect that we will adjourn or postpone
the meeting to solicit additional proxies.
|
|
|
|
|
Voting by Proxy (page 12) |
You may authorize your shares to be voted by proxy by returning
the enclosed proxy card. If you hold your shares through a
broker or other nominee, you must follow the procedures provided
by your broker.
|
|
|
|
|
Revocability of Proxy (page 12) |
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the
annual meeting. If you have not authorized your shares to be
voted through your broker, you may revoke your proxy by:
|
|
|
|
|
sending a later-dated proxy; |
|
|
|
giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of UDI at
our principal executive offices; or |
|
|
|
voting in person at the annual meeting. |
Simply attending the annual meeting, without voting, will not
constitute revocation of your proxy. If your shares of our
common stock are held in street name, you must
follow the instructions of your broker or other holder of record
regarding revocation of proxies.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger to Our U.S. Stockholders (page 26)
The receipt of the merger consideration in cash for each share
of our common stock pursuant to the merger will be a taxable
transaction to U.S. holders for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, each of
our stockholders that is a U.S. holder generally will
recognize taxable gain or loss as a result of the merger
measured by the difference, if any, between the merger
consideration and the adjusted tax basis in the shares of our
common stock owned by the stockholder. That gain or loss will be
a capital gain or loss if the share is held as a capital asset
in the hands of the stockholder, and will be long-term capital
gain or loss if the share has been held for more than twelve
months at the time of the completion of the merger.
Stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as
to the particular tax consequences to them of the merger.
Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
(page 28)
When considering the recommendation by our board of directors in
favor of adoption of the merger agreement, you should be aware
that our directors and executive officers have interests in the
merger that are different from, or in addition to, yours,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our directors and executive officers will have their unvested
stock options and restricted stock accelerated and their vested
and unvested stock options and restricted stock cashed
out in connection with the merger, meaning that they will
receive cash payments for each share underlying their options |
6
|
|
|
|
|
equal to the excess of $75.00 per share over the exercise
price per share of their options and $75.00 per share of
restricted stock, subject to any required withholding for taxes; |
|
|
|
our executive officers may be entitled to benefits under their
employment or severance agreements, which generally provide for
lump sum cash payments in an amount equal to the equivalent of
(i) one, two, or three times their annual salaries and
their target bonuses and (ii) a pro rata target bonus for
the year of termination and continued employee benefits for the
period their annual salaries continue, in each case, in the
event that an executive officers employment is terminated
by us other than for cause or by the executive for good reason,
and provide for an additional gross-up lump sum
payment to cover the costs of excise taxes, if any, to which our
executive officers may be subject; |
|
|
|
certain indemnification and insurance arrangements for our
current and former directors and officers will be continued
following completion of the merger; |
|
|
|
Thomas W. Rabaut, our president and chief executive officer, has
been offered the position of head of BAE Systems global
land systems business following the merger. Discussions
regarding the terms on which Mr. Rabaut would take on this
role are in progress and no definitive agreement has been
reached by the parties; |
|
|
|
Additionally, discussions have commenced regarding BAE
Systems potential employment of other UDI executive
officers; and |
|
|
|
BAE Systems has begun discussions with one or more members of
our current board of directors about joining the board of
directors of BAE Systems following completion of the merger. |
Conversion of Shares; Procedures For Exchange of Certificates
(page 31)
Upon completion of the merger, each issued and outstanding share
of our common stock not owned by UDI, BAE Systems, or
Acquisition Sub, or any of their wholly owned subsidiaries, will
be converted into the right to receive $75.00 in cash, without
interest. As soon as reasonably practicable after the completion
of the merger, you will receive from the paying agent for the
merger consideration a letter of transmittal and instructions
advising you how to surrender your stock certificates in
exchange for your merger consideration. At that time, you must
send to the paying agent your stock certificates with your
completed letter of transmittal. You will receive your merger
consideration after you deliver to the paying agent your stock
certificates and other documents required by the paying agent.
Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger
(page 32)
The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976
provides that transactions such as the merger may not be
completed until certain information has been submitted to the
Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the
U.S. Department of Justice and certain waiting period
requirements have been satisfied. On March 14, 2005, we and
BAE Parent each filed a Notification and Report Form with the
Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission and
requested an early termination of the waiting period. If early
termination is not granted, the waiting period will expire at
11:59 p.m. on April 13, 2005 unless a request for
additional information is made.
Section 721 of Title VII of the United States Defense
Production Act of 1950, as amended by Section 5021 of the
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, which we refer to
as Exon-Florio, authorizes the President of the United States to
make an investigation to determine the effects on national
security of mergers, acquisitions and takeovers by or with
foreign persons which could result in foreign control of persons
engaged in interstate commerce in the United States. The merger
is subject to review under Exon-Florio because BAE Systems is a
wholly owned subsidiary of a foreign corporation. On
March 16, 2005, we and BAE Systems filed a joint voluntary
notification with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the
United States, which we refer to as CFIUS, which has been
delegated authority to review transactions under Exon-Florio.
Unless CFIUS takes further action, the waiting period will
expire at 11:59 p.m. on April 15, 2005.
The Swedish Competition Act provides that transactions such as
the merger may not be completed until certain information has
been submitted to the Swedish Competition Authority, and the
Swedish Competition Authority has decided not to oppose the
merger. BAE Parent filed the required notification with the
Swedish Competition Authority on March 30, 2005. The
Swedish Competition Authority must decide within
7
25 working days of the filing of the required notification
whether to oppose the merger or to initiate an in-depth
investigation.
The Law on Protection of Competition of Turkey provides that
transactions such as the merger may not be completed until
certain information has been submitted to the Turkish
Competition Authority, and the Turkish Competition Authority has
cleared the merger. BAE Parent filed the required notification
with the Turkish Competition Authority on March 31, 2005.
The Turkish Competition Authority must decide either to clear
the merger or to initiate an in-depth investigation within
30 days from the date of filing of the notification.
In addition, BAE Parent has made a filing with respect to the
merger with the relevant authorities in Germany, under its Act
Against Restraints on Competition, and BAE Systems has made a
filing with respect to the merger with the relevant authorities
in Norway, under the Norwegian Competition Act.
UDI and BAE Parent also intend to make filings in Japan, under
its Act Concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and
Maintenance of Fair Trade and with Japans Ministry of
Finance, and in South Korea, under its Monopoly Regulation and
Fair Trade Act. The merger may be completed prior to the
clearance by the relevant authorities in these jurisdictions,
but the relevant authority retains jurisdiction following
completion of the merger to assess the competitive impact of the
merger.
Under the merger agreement, both UDI and BAE Systems have agreed
to use their reasonable best efforts, subject to certain
limitations, to obtain all required governmental approvals in
connection with the completion of the merger. Except as noted
above with respect to the required filings under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, a review under Exon-Florio, other foreign
governmental filings, and the filing of a certificate of merger
in Delaware at or before the effective date of the merger, we
are unaware of any material approvals of federal, state, or
foreign governmental entities required for the completion of the
merger.
Merger Consideration (page 34)
Upon completion of the merger, each share of our common stock
issued and outstanding will be converted into the right to
receive $75.00 in cash, without interest. As a result of the
merger, you will receive a total amount equal to the product
obtained by multiplying $75.00 by the number of shares of our
common stock that you own upon surrender of your stock
certificates. We expect the merger to close in the second
quarter of 2005 as soon as possible after all the conditions to
the merger are satisfied or waived; however, there can be no
assurance that the merger will close at that time, or at all.
Treatment of Stock Options and Restricted Stock
(page 34)
Upon completion of the merger, all of our outstanding stock
options will become fully vested, and option holders will be
entitled to receive, for each option held, a cash payment (less
withholding taxes and without interest) equal to the excess of
$75.00 in cash, without interest, over the exercise price per
share of the option, multiplied by the number of shares of our
common stock subject to the option. In addition, upon completion
of the merger, each share of restricted stock will become fully
vested and free of restriction on transfer and the holder
thereof will be entitled to receive $75.00 in cash, without
interest, for each share of restricted stock held.
Stockholders Seeking Appraisal (page 29)
Record holders of our common stock have the right under the DGCL
to exercise appraisal rights and to receive payment in cash for
the fair value of their shares of our common stock determined in
accordance with the DGCL, if such rights are properly perfected.
The fair value of shares of our common stock as determined in
accordance with the DGCL may be more or less than the merger
consideration to be paid to holders of our common stock who
choose not to exercise their appraisal rights. To preserve their
rights, record holders of our common stock who wish to exercise
appraisal rights must precisely follow specific procedures set
forth in the DGCL. These procedures are described in this proxy
statement, and the provisions of the DGCL that grant appraisal
rights and govern such procedures are attached as Annex D
to this proxy statement.
8
Conditions to the Merger (page 38)
As more fully described in this proxy statement and the merger
agreement, the completion of the merger depends on the
satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions. If these
conditions are not satisfied or waived, the merger will not be
completed.
No Solicitation of Other Offers; Adverse Recommendation
Change (page 41)
We have agreed in the merger agreement that we will not, and
will not authorize or permit any of our representatives to,
directly or indirectly (i) solicit, initiate, knowingly
encourage, or knowingly facilitate any inquiry or the making of
any proposal that constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to
a takeover proposal or (ii) participate in any discussions
or negotiations regarding a takeover proposal. Notwithstanding
these limitations, prior to the adoption of the merger agreement
by our stockholders, we may furnish information in response to
and engage in discussions and negotiations with respect to an
unsolicited takeover proposal that our board of directors
determines in good faith after consultation with a financial
advisor of nationally recognized reputation constitutes or is
reasonably likely to lead to a superior proposal. See
The Merger Agreement No Solicitation of
Other Offers; Adverse Recommendation Change; Termination to
Accept a Superior Proposal for a further description
of these restrictions.
Termination of the Merger Agreement (page 43)
The merger agreement may be terminated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of BAE Systems, Acquisition Sub, and
UDI; |
|
|
|
by either BAE Systems or UDI: |
|
|
|
|
|
if the merger has not been consummated by December 6, 2005,
except that a party who has willfully and materially breached
the merger agreement cannot terminate on this basis; |
|
|
|
if a governmental entity permanently enjoins the consummation of
the merger and such action has become final and nonappealable; |
|
|
|
if our stockholders do not adopt the merger agreement; or |
|
|
|
if the shareholders of BAE Parent do not approve the merger. |
|
|
|
|
|
if we have breached the merger agreement and such breach would
cause the condition to the merger relating to our
representations and warranties or our covenants and agreements
not to be satisfied, and such breach cannot be or has not been
cured within 30 days of notice; or |
|
|
|
our board of directors changes in any manner adverse to BAE
Systems or withdraws its recommendation that our stockholders
adopt the merger agreement, approves or recommends a takeover
proposal from a third party, or determines that the merger
agreement or the merger is no longer advisable or recommends
that our stockholders reject the merger agreement, the merger,
or the related transactions. |
|
|
|
|
|
if either BAE Systems or Acquisition Sub has breached the merger
agreement and such breach would cause the condition to the
merger relating to their representations and warranties or their
covenants and agreements not to be satisfied, and such breach
cannot be or has not been cured within 30 days of notice; |
|
|
|
if we enter into a definitive agreement for a superior proposal
and pay the termination fee to BAE Systems and Acquisition
Sub; or |
|
|
|
if the board of directors of BAE Parent does not recommend the
approval of the merger by the shareholders of BAE Parent in the
circular sent to shareholders of BAE Parent or the board of
directors of BAE Parent changes in a manner adverse to us or
withdraws its recommendation of the merger to the shareholders
of BAE Parent or recommends that the shareholders of BAE Parent
reject the merger. |
9
Termination Fee (page 43)
Upon termination of the merger agreement by our board of
directors in order for UDI to enter into a superior acquisition
agreement, we are obligated under the merger agreement to pay
BAE Systems a termination fee of $119,233,768. We are also
obligated to pay this termination fee to BAE Systems in certain
other circumstances following termination of the merger
agreement. See The Merger Agreement
Termination Fee for additional detail.
10
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF OUR STOCKHOLDERS
Date, Time, Place, and Purpose of Annual meeting
The annual meeting will be held on May 10, 2005 at 11:00
a.m. local time at the Hyatt Regency Crystal City,
2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202.
At the annual meeting we will ask you to consider and vote on
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Our board of
directors has declared that the merger and the merger agreement
are advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, UDI and
our stockholders, has approved the merger, the merger agreement,
and the related transactions, and has directed that the merger
be submitted for consideration at the annual meeting. Our
board of directors recommends that our stockholders
vote FOR adoption of the merger agreement.
We will also be asking you to elect nine directors to serve on
our board of directors, to approve the adjournment, if
necessary, of the annual meeting to solicit proxies in favor of
adoption of the merger agreement, and to vote on any other
matters that may properly come before the annual meeting. Our
board of directors recommends that you vote FOR the
director nominees and FOR the adjournment proposal. The
proposals for the election of nine directors to serve on our
board of directors and to approve the adjournment, if necessary,
will not affect the vote on the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement.
Stock Entitled to Vote; Record Date
The holders of record of shares of our common stock as of the
close of business on March 21, 2005, which is the record
date for the annual meeting, are entitled to notice of and to
vote at the annual meeting. On the record date, there were
50,846,626 shares of our common stock outstanding, held by
approximately 38 stockholders of record.
Vote Required; Quorum
The adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common
stock outstanding on the record date and entitled to vote at the
annual meeting. Each holder of a share of our common stock is
entitled to one vote per share. Because the vote is based on the
number of shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to
vote rather than on the number of votes cast, failure to return
your completed proxy card or to vote in person will have the
same effect as a vote AGAINST adoption of the merger
agreement.
With respect to the other matters being considered at the annual
meeting, the director nominees receiving the highest number of
votes will be elected to our board of directors and the approval
of the adjournment proposal requires the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock voting
in person or by proxy at the annual meeting.
Holders of at least a majority of the shares of our common stock
issued and outstanding as of the record date and entitled to
vote at the annual meeting must be present in person or
represented by proxy at the annual meeting to constitute a
quorum to conduct business at the annual meeting. In the event
that a quorum is not present in person or by proxy at the annual
meeting, we currently expect that we will adjourn or postpone
the meeting to solicit additional proxies.
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Shares of our common stock held by brokers for customers who
have not provided voting instructions on a matter as to which
the broker lacks discretion to vote the customers shares
are referred to generally as broker non-votes. Under
the rules of the NYSE, brokers do not have discretion to vote
your shares for or against the merger or the proposal to adjourn
the annual meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies
in favor of adoption of the merger agreement. A properly
executed proxy marked ABSTAIN and broker non-votes
will be treated as shares of stock that are present and entitled
to vote at the annual meeting for purposes of determining
whether a quorum exists and will have the same effect as
votes AGAINST adoption of the merger agreement.
11
Brokers who hold shares of our common stock in street name for
customers who are the beneficial owners of such shares have
discretion to vote these shares on routine matters. Brokers will
have discretionary authority to vote shares held in street name
on the proposals to elect nine directors to serve on our board
of directors.
Share Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
As of March 21, 2005, the directors and executive officers
of UDI beneficially owned approximately 3.3% of the outstanding
shares of our common stock. To our knowledge, these directors
and executive officers intend to vote in favor of adoption of
the merger agreement.
Voting by Proxy
This proxy statement is being sent to you on behalf of our board
of directors for the purpose of requesting that you allow your
shares of our common stock to be represented at the annual
meeting by the persons named in the enclosed proxy card. All
shares of our common stock represented by properly executed
proxies received in time for the annual meeting will be voted at
the annual meeting in the manner specified by the holder. If a
written proxy card is signed by a stockholder and returned
without instructions, the shares of our common stock represented
by the proxy card will be voted FOR adoption of the merger
agreement, FOR approval of any proposal to adjourn the annual
meeting to solicit additional proxies in favor of adoption of
the merger agreement, and FOR the election of the nine director
nominees named in this proxy statement to serve on our board of
directors. Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR
adoption of the merger agreement.
Stockholders who have questions or requests for assistance in
completing and submitting proxy cards should contact MacKenzie
Partners, Inc., our proxy solicitor, at (800) 322-2885
(toll-free) or (212) 929-5500 (collect).
Stockholders who hold their shares of our common stock in
street name, meaning in the name of a bank, broker
or other person who is the record holder, must either direct the
record holder of their shares of our common stock how to vote
their shares or obtain a proxy from the record holder to vote
their shares at the annual meeting.
Revocability of Proxies
You can revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the
annual meeting. If you have not authorized your shares to be
voted through your broker, you may revoke your proxy by:
|
|
|
|
|
submitting another properly completed proxy bearing a later date; |
|
|
|
giving written notice of revocation to UDI, addressed to the
Secretary (United Defense Industries, Inc., 1525 Wilson Blvd.,
Suite 700, Arlington, Virginia 22209); or |
|
|
|
attending the annual meeting and voting by in person. |
Simply attending the annual meeting, without voting, will not
constitute a revocation of a proxy. If your shares of our common
stock are held in the name of a bank, broker, trustee, or other
holder of record, you must follow the instructions of your
broker or other holder of record to revoke a previously given
proxy.
Solicitation of Proxies
In addition to solicitation by mail, we may use our directors,
officers, and employees to solicit proxies by telephone, other
electronic means or in person. These people will not receive any
additional compensation for their services, but we will
reimburse them for their out-of-pocket expenses. We will
reimburse banks, brokers, nominees, custodians, and fiduciaries
for their reasonable expenses in forwarding copies of this proxy
statement to the beneficial owners of shares of our common stock
and in obtaining voting instructions from those owners. We will
pay all costs and expenses relating to filing, printing, and
mailing this proxy statement and relating to the solicitation of
proxies.
We have engaged MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the
solicitation of proxies for the annual meeting and have agreed
to pay MacKenzie Partners, Inc. a fee of $10,000, plus
reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. The address of
MacKenzie Partners, Inc. is 105 Madison Avenue, New York, New
York 10016. MacKenzie Partners, Inc.s telephone number is
(800) 322-2885 (toll-free) or (212) 929-5500 (collect).
12
Other Business
We do not expect that any matters other than the proposals to
(i) adopt the merger agreement, (ii) elect nine
directors to serve on our board of directors, and
(iii) adjourn the annual meeting, if necessary, to solicit
additional proxies in favor of adoption of the merger agreement
will be brought before the annual meeting. If, however, any
other matter properly comes before the annual meeting, or in the
event of any adjournment or postponement of the annual meeting,
the proxy holders will vote thereon in accordance with their
discretion.
Adjournments and Postponements
Although it is not expected, the annual meeting may be adjourned
or postponed for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies.
Any adjournment may be made without notice, other than by
announcement made at the annual meeting, by approval of the
holders of at least a majority of the shares of our common stock
present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting,
whether or not a quorum exists. Any adjournment or postponement
of the annual meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional
proxies in favor of adopting the merger agreement will allow our
stockholders who have already sent in their proxies to revoke
them at any time prior to their use.
13
THE COMPANIES
United Defense Industries, Inc.
UDI was incorporated in 1997 to acquire United Defense, L.P., a
global leader in the design, development, and production of
combat vehicles, artillery systems, naval guns, and missile
launchers used by the U.S. Department of Defense and allied
militaries throughout the world. In 2000, we acquired Bofors
Defence, or Bofors, based in Sweden, a leading producer of
artillery systems, air defense and naval guns, and precision
munitions. In 2002, we acquired United States Marine Repair,
Inc., or USMR, the leading provider of ship repair, maintenance,
and modernization services to the U.S. Navy, other
U.S. defense related agencies, and commercial customers.
With the acquisition of USMR, we are now organized into two
separate product and service lines: Defense Systems and Ship
Repair and Maintenance. Our Defense Systems program portfolio
consists of a mix of weapons system development, production,
upgrade, and life cycle support programs. Our Ship Repair and
Maintenance business segment consists of ship repair,
maintenance, and modernization service programs.
Our Defense Systems segments primary military programs
include upgrades of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, or BFV, and
its derivatives, naval ordnance production and development
programs, and development of several ground vehicle types within
the Armys Future Combat Systems, or FCS, program,
including the Non-Line-of-Sight Cannon. Since 1981, the BFV has
served as the leading domestically produced vehicle able to
fulfill the dual role of troop transport and armored fighting
vehicle. We have maintained our prime contractor position on the
BFV program since production began, and have added a number of
technology-based upgrades and derivative vehicles that continue
to extend the programs life cycle. In addition to managing
the BFV vehicle programs, we serve as the prime contractor for a
number of military programs, several of which have spanned
decades, including the M88 tank recovery vehicle since 1960, the
M113 armored personnel carrier since 1960, and the
U.S. Navys Mk45 naval gun system since 1968.
The Ship Repair and Maintenance segments primary military
contracts relate to long-term maintenance programs on
U.S. surface ships, including guided missile destroyers,
cruisers, mine countermeasures ships, cargo, and amphibious
ships.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1525 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, Virginia 22209, and our
telephone number is (703) 312-6100.
BAE Systems North America Inc.
BAE Systems is headquartered in Rockville, Maryland. BAE Systems
is a wholly owned subsidiary of BAE Parent. BAE Systems is a
leading electronics, information systems, and technology
services company, and one of the largest providers of systems
and services for the U.S. Department of Defense. BAE
Systems currently employs approximately 30,000 people across
some 30 states, generating sales of more than
$5 billion. BAE Systems designs, develops, manufactures,
and supports a wide range of advanced aerospace products,
electronic systems, and information technology for the
U.S. government and commercial customers.
BAE Systems principal executive offices are located at
1601 Research Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland 20850, and its
telephone number is (301) 838-6000.
Ute Acquisition Company Inc.
Acquisition Sub is a Delaware corporation organized in
connection with the merger and to date has engaged in no
activities other than those incidental to its formation and the
consummation of the merger. Acquisition Sub is a wholly owned
subsidiary of BAE Systems. The mailing address of Acquisition
Subs principal executive offices is 1601 Research
Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland 20850, and its telephone number
is (301) 838-6000.
14
THE MERGER
Background of the Merger
Over the course of the past three years, our board of directors
and senior management, including Thomas W. Rabaut, our president
and chief executive officer, Francis Raborn, our vice president
and chief financial officer, and David V. Kolovat, our vice
president, secretary, and general counsel, have periodically
reviewed and assessed our business strategy, the various trends
and conditions impacting our business and various strategic
alternatives available to our company, including strategic
corporate acquisitions of third parties.
On January 19, 2005, Mr. Rabaut received a telephone
call from a representative of a financial advisor acting on
behalf of a potential acquiror in the defense industry, which we
refer to as Company A. During this call, this representative
informed Mr. Rabaut that Company A desired to engage in
discussions with us about a potential acquisition of our
company. On January 20, 2005, we received a telephone call
from Mr. Mark Ronald, president and chief executive officer
of BAE Systems, who indicated that he wished to discuss the
possibility of an acquisition of our company by BAE Systems.
Messrs. Rabaut and Raborn informed William E.
Conway, Jr., chairman of our board of directors, about
these unsolicited inquiries and, thereafter, approached JPMorgan
and Lehman Brothers in order to seek advice on strategic
alternatives, including with regard to potential strategies for
soliciting proposals, pricing and valuation if our board of
directors decided to pursue a sale of our company.
Messrs. Rabaut, Raborn, and Kolovat and other members of
our senior management also consulted with our legal counsel,
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, or Gibson Dunn, regarding
legal and structural issues relating to our strategic
alternatives, including a potential sale of our company. On
January 21, 2005, Messrs. Rabaut, Raborn, and Kolovat
met with representatives of JPMorgan, Lehman Brothers, and
Gibson Dunn to discuss our alternatives in response to the
inquiries from BAE Systems and Company A. Based on these
discussions, the participants determined that, while no decision
had yet been made as to whether our company would be offered for
sale, Mr. Rabaut should contact Mr. Ronald and senior
management from Company A to discuss each companys
respective interest in a possible acquisition of our company.
On January 21, 2005, Messrs. Rabaut and Raborn met
with Mr. Ronald and Walter Havenstein, executive vice
president of BAE Systems, to discuss further BAE Systems
interest in a possible acquisition of our company.
Messrs. Ronald and Havenstein described BAE Systems
strategic interest in a possible acquisition of our company.
Mr. Rabaut stated that our company was not for sale but
indicated that he would communicate BAE Systems interest
to our board of directors. During this meeting, Mr. Ronald
provided a draft confidentiality and non-disclosure agreement to
Messrs. Rabaut and Raborn. Following this meeting,
Mr. Rabaut telephoned Mr. Ronald to request that BAE
Systems submit a letter summarizing its interest in a possible
acquisition of our company, including a proposed acquisition
price, and indicated that he would communicate BAE Systems
interest to our board of directors.
At a meeting of our board of directors on January 24, 2005,
Mr. Rabaut provided a report summarizing the communications
with BAE Systems and Company A. At this meeting, our board of
directors authorized our senior management to continue
exploratory discussions with BAE Systems and Company A to
determine if it would become appropriate to commence a process
for the sale of our company. Also at this meeting, our senior
management reported to our board of directors that we were
engaging JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers as financial advisors and
Gibson Dunn as legal advisors in connection with considering a
possible sale of our company.
On January 26, 2005, BAE Parent sent a letter to
Mr. Rabaut, setting forth a non-binding indication of
interest for a possible acquisition of our company at a price of
$56 in cash per share. On January 27, 2005, we announced
net income for 2004 of $3.15 per fully diluted share, an
increase of 18% over net income for 2003. We also announced that
our board of directors had authorized the repurchase of an
additional $100 million in stock under our existing stock
buyback program, and had for the first time following our
initial public offering authorized a quarterly dividend payment
of $0.125 per share.
On February 1, 2005, Messrs. Conway, Rabaut, Raborn,
and Kolovat participated in a teleconference with
representatives of JPMorgan, Lehman Brothers, and Gibson Dunn to
review this letter and possible responses. Following these
discussions, Mr. Rabaut called Mr. Ronald on
February 1, 2005 and stated again
15
that our company was not for sale but indicated that we would be
willing to explore BAE Systems indication of interest
further.
While preliminary discussions with BAE Systems described above
were continuing, we also engaged in discussions with Company A
regarding a possible acquisition of our company. On
January 27, 2005, Messrs. Rabaut and Raborn met with
two senior executives from Company A. During this meeting, the
Company A executives described Company As strategic
interest in a possible acquisition of our company and their
desire to enter into more substantive discussions. These
executives also indicated that Company A would be willing to
structure the proposed acquisition as an all-cash transaction.
Mr. Rabaut indicated that our company was not for sale, but
again asked Company A to summarize its proposal for the
acquisition of our company in writing. Mr. Rabaut again
stated that he would communicate a proposal submitted by Company
A to our board of directors. On February 2, 2005, Company A
delivered a letter to us, expressing its interest in a possible
acquisition of our company at a price range of $56-$60 in cash
per share.
JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers sent drafts of their respective
engagement letters to us on February 2, 2005, and we
subsequently engaged JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers to act as
financial advisors in connection with a possible acquisition of
our company.
At a meeting of our board of directors on February 4, 2005,
representatives of JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers made a
presentation regarding prospective interested parties, the
valuation of our company, pricing parameters and strategic
issues to consider in pursuing a potential sale of our company.
At this meeting, our board of directors also considered the
indication of interest letters submitted by BAE Systems and
Company A. Also, at this meeting, Gibson Dunn reviewed the
fiduciary duties and other legal responsibilities of directors
in the context of a potential acquisition of our company. After
discussions with our senior management and financial and legal
advisors, our board of directors determined that while our
company was not for sale and no public auction process should be
initiated at that time, the possibility of a sale of our company
should be explored and, depending on the level of interest
received from third parties, our board of directors would then
decide whether to pursue a sale of our company. To facilitate
the process outlined above, our board of directors decided that
we should provide more information to interested parties in the
form of management presentations and financial projections. In
addition, our board of directors and senior management believed
that an acquisition of our company, with its portfolio of land
systems, naval business capabilities and precision munitions,
represented an important strategic opportunity for BAE Systems
and Company A as well as two additional leading publicly traded
companies in the defense industry. Based on this belief, our
board of directors decided that the two additional companies,
which we refer to as Company C and Company D, should be
contacted to discuss their possible interest in an acquisition
of our company.
On February 4, 2005, Mr. Rabaut contacted
representatives of Company C and Company D to assess their
interest in a potential acquisition of our company. On
February 8, 2005, Messrs. Rabaut and Raborn met with
two senior executives from Company D to discuss its interest in
a potential acquisition of our company. On February 9,
2005, Messrs. Rabaut and Raborn met with Richard L. Olver,
chairman of BAE Parent, and Mr. Ronald to discuss, among
other things, BAE Systems interest in a potential
acquisition of our company.
On February 10, 2005, Company C sent a letter to
Mr. Rabaut, indicating its interest in acquiring our
company at a price range of $58-$62 in cash per share. Despite
expressing some initial interest in a possible acquisition of
our company, Company D did not submit a written indication of
interest to us or our advisors.
Between February 8, 2005 and February 17, 2005, we
negotiated and executed confidentiality, non-disclosure and
standstill agreements with each of BAE Systems, Company A and
Company C. Between February 11, 2005 and February 22,
2005, our senior management made substantially similar
management presentations to the senior management and financial
advisors of each of BAE Systems, Company A and Company C, during
which, among other things, financial data, including financial
projections, and operational data were discussed. Separately, in
anticipation of a potential acquisition of our company, Gibson
Dunn began preparation of a draft merger agreement on
February 8, 2005.
As a follow-up to the management presentation provided to
representatives of BAE Systems on February 11, 2005, there
were several conversations between the general counsel and the
chief financial officer
16
of BAE Systems and Messrs. Raborn and Kolovat regarding
various legal, regulatory and financial matters relating to our
company, and in response to questions, we provided certain
additional information to BAE Systems. On February 14,
2005, President Bush sent a supplemental budget request for
fiscal year 2005 to Congress, which was in accord with prior
administration budget decisions that had been reported in the
weeks leading up to February 14 and which included requests for
significant increases in spending on several of our major
programs. On February 25, 2005, our financial advisors
provided a draft of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004 to BAE Systems, Company A and
Company C and their respective financial advisors.
Our board of directors convened a meeting on February 17,
2005, at which Mr. Raborn made a presentation regarding our
financial projections and discussions with the four potentially
interested companies. Although our board of directors had not
determined to sell our company, it indicated it would be willing
to review proposals from interested parties. Our board of
directors also discussed the possibility of contacting
additional parties in the defense industry. While our board of
directors determined it was in the best interests of our
stockholders to continue discussions with BAE Systems,
Company A and Company C, it also decided that
Company E, another leading publicly traded company in the
defense industry, should be contacted to assess its interest in
a possible acquisition of our company. Our board of directors
directed our senior management and financial advisors to solicit
proposals from each of the interested companies by
February 28, 2005 to be considered as soon as practicable
following receipt of the revised proposals.
Also on February 17, 2005, Mr. Raborn met with a
senior executive from Company C to discuss its interest in
a potential acquisition of our company. Mr. Rabaut also met
with the chief executive officer of Company C on
February 22, 2005 to discuss further its interest in a
potential transaction. On February 18, 2005, our financial
advisors contacted representatives of Company E to assess
its interest in a possible acquisition of our company, which
Company E decided not to pursue.
On February 23, 2005, JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers sent a
letter to representatives of BAE Systems, Company A and
Company C requesting that, based on publicly available
information and the information presented at the management
presentations and in our financial projections, written
proposals, including price, for an acquisition of our company be
submitted by February 28, 2005. This letter indicated that
our board of directors would consider these proposals as soon as
practicable after February 28, 2005 to decide whether to
continue discussions regarding a potential acquisition of our
company. This letter also requested information from each of the
interested parties regarding financing, regulatory and other
approvals, and anticipated timing for closing of an acquisition
of our company.
On February 28, 2005, we received written proposals from
BAE Systems, Company A and Company C. BAE Systems
proposed to acquire our company for $67 per share in cash.
On its own initiative, BAE Systems included a draft merger
agreement with its proposal, which contemplated a one-step
merger transaction. BAE Systems proposal also indicated
that it would be willing to move quickly to negotiate and
execute a definitive merger agreement for an acquisition of our
company and indicated that it would not require any further due
diligence from us prior to execution of a definitive merger
agreement. Company A proposed to acquire our company at a
price of $62 in cash per share, and Company C proposed to
acquire our company at a price of $64 in cash per share. These
proposals from Company A and Company C each indicated
that further due diligence would be required prior to execution
of a definitive merger agreement.
On March 1, 2005, representatives of BAE Systems met with
our representatives at Gibson Dunns offices in
Washington, D.C. to discuss regulatory and shareholder
approvals required in connection with a possible acquisition of
our company by BAE Systems. Representatives of our company and
BAE Systems as well as representatives of Gibson Dunn and
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, who we refer to as
Cravath, legal counsel to BAE Systems, also engaged in a brief
discussion at the end of this meeting regarding the structure
and timing of a potential acquisition of our company by BAE
Systems and the terms of the draft merger agreement provided by
BAE Systems. Beginning on February 28, 2005, our senior
management and Gibson Dunn commenced their review of and comment
on the draft merger agreement provided by BAE Systems as part of
its proposal.
On March 2, 2005, our board of directors held a meeting
during which the members of our board of directors, along with
our senior management and financial and legal advisors, reviewed
the proposals
17
submitted on February 28, 2005. At this meeting,
representatives of our financial advisors made a detailed
financial presentation regarding a possible acquisition of our
company, including a valuation analysis of our company. Our
board of directors discussed the prices, timing considerations,
financing issues and other elements of each proposal as well as
the appropriate strategy for responding to the February 28
proposals. Following these discussions, our board of directors
indicated that while it had not determined to sell our company,
it had determined that representatives of our financial advisors
should contact BAE Systems, Company A and Company C, and
inform each of them that our board of directors would be willing
to continue discussions regarding an acquisition of our company,
provided they would be willing to increase their proposed price
per share to $70 in cash and to negotiate and execute a
definitive merger agreement within a few days following the
March 2 meeting.
During the morning of March 3, 2005, representatives of our
financial advisors contacted representatives of the financial
advisors of BAE Systems, Company A and Company C in
accordance with the instructions of our board of directors. In
response, that same day, Company A and Company C each
requested a draft merger agreement. Later on March 3, 2005,
Gibson Dunn circulated a draft merger agreement to both Company
A and Company C, which draft merger agreement contemplated a
two-step acquisition (i.e., a cash tender offer followed by a
cash merger).
On March 3, 2005, representatives of BAE Systems
financial advisors contacted representatives of JPMorgan and
Lehman Brothers to inform them that BAE Systems was willing to
increase its proposed price to $70 per share in cash,
subject to several conditions, including that the parties move
promptly to execute the definitive merger agreement. Later on
March 3, 2005, Gibson Dunn provided to BAE Systems and
Cravath a mark-up reflecting our comments on the draft merger
agreement.
At a meeting of our board of directors on March 4, 2005,
Messrs. Rabaut and Raborn provided an update regarding the
status of discussions with each of the interested parties and
briefly reviewed the merits of the proposals received.
Beginning in the early afternoon of March 4, 2005,
Messrs. Raborn and Kolovat, along with representatives of
Gibson Dunn, met with representatives of BAE Systems and Cravath
at Gibson Dunns offices in Washington, D.C. to
negotiate the draft merger agreement. These discussions and
negotiations focused principally on conditions to closing,
operating covenants, the amount of the proposed termination fee
and the circumstances under which it would be payable, and the
scope of our representations and warranties.
In the evening of March 4, 2005, JPMorgan and Lehman
Brothers communicated to our senior management that Company A
had increased its offer to acquire us to $70 per share in
cash. As part of this revised proposal, Company A indicated that
it would be willing to move quickly to execute a definitive
merger agreement within the time-frame contemplated by our board
of directors. Company A also requested an opportunity to perform
limited additional due diligence, which it completed the next
day. Later in the evening of March 4, 2005, counsel for
Company A provided to us and to Gibson Dunn a mark-up of the
draft merger agreement Gibson Dunn had distributed on
March 3, 2005. Neither we nor our financial advisors
received a response from Company C to our request for a revised
proposal.
Based on Company As revised proposal and the advice of
JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers, on March 5, 2005,
representatives of our company requested best and final offers
from BAE Systems and Company A by noon on March 6, 2005. In
the evening of March 5, Gibson Dunn distributed a final bid
procedures letter to the financial advisers for BAE Systems and
Company A, which set forth the process for submitting best and
final offers. A meeting of our board of directors was scheduled
to take place on March 6, 2005 as promptly as practicable
after receiving the best and final offers.
On March 5, 2005, Cravath circulated a revised draft of the
merger agreement based on the prior days discussions.
Negotiations on the merger agreement between Messrs. Raborn
and Kolovat and representatives of Gibson Dunn, on the one hand,
and representatives of BAE Systems and Cravath, on the other
hand, continued at the offices of Gibson Dunn in
Washington, D.C. Negotiations focused principally on the
amount of the termination fee and the circumstances under which
it would be payable as well as operating covenants and the scope
of our representations and warranties. By the evening of
March 5, we had substantially completed negotiations with
BAE Systems regarding its proposed merger agreement.
18
On March 5, 2005, Messrs. Raborn and Kolovat, along
with Gibson Dunn, participated in a series of teleconferences
with representatives of Company A and its legal advisors, during
which the parties reviewed and negotiated the draft merger
agreement that had been presented to Company A and Company
As comments thereto. These discussions and negotiations
focused principally on the structure of the proposed
transaction, conditions to closing, operating covenants, the
amount of the proposed termination fee and the circumstances
under which it would be payable and the scope of our
representations and warranties. Messrs. Raborn and Kolovat,
along with Gibson Dunn and our financial advisors, also
participated in a separate call with Company A and its legal
advisors and proposed financing providers regarding the
contemplated financing that Company A intended to arrange to
fund its proposed acquisition of our company. Following these
discussions and negotiations, Gibson Dunn circulated a revised
draft merger agreement to Company A early in the morning of
March 6, 2005.
BAE Systems and Company A each submitted final proposals to
JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers around noon on March 6, 2005.
Company A submitted a proposal that included a price per share
in cash that was greater than the price per share that it
offered on March 4, 2005 but less than the price per share
offered by BAE Systems.
BAE Systems submitted a proposal for the acquisition of our
company at a price of $75 per share in cash. BAE
Systems proposal was not subject to any financing
condition, and BAE Systems indicated in its proposal that it had
access to all cash resources necessary to complete its proposed
acquisition of our company. BAE Systems proposal also
indicated that it would be prepared immediately following the
meeting of our board of directors to execute the form of merger
agreement that had been negotiated the prior day.
Our board of directors convened a meeting at 1:00 p.m. on
March 6, 2005 to consider the final proposals made by BAE
Systems and Company A. During this meeting, the members of our
board of directors, with the assistance of our senior management
and representatives of our financial and legal advisors,
reviewed and discussed the contents of the letters submitted by
BAE Systems and Company A earlier that day. Gibson Dunn reported
on the status and terms of the proposed merger agreements,
including the terms relating to closing conditions and the
amount of the proposed termination fee and the circumstances
under which it would be payable. After consideration of the
merits of the final proposals, our board of directors determined
that BAE Systems proposal was clearly superior to Company
As proposal in price and other respects.
Our board of directors then requested that its financial and
legal advisors provide additional information regarding the
merger agreement with BAE Systems and the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be
received by our stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement
with BAE Systems. Gibson Dunn provided our board of directors
with additional detail regarding the terms of the proposed
merger agreement with BAE Systems, including: the scope of our
representations and warranties; operating covenants; provisions
regarding treatment of our employees and employee benefits; the
conditions to closing; termination rights of the parties; the
amount of the termination fee and the circumstances under which
it would be payable; and the terms of the guarantee by BAE
Parent of BAE Systems and Acquisition Subs
obligation to pay the merger consideration in accordance with
the terms of the merger agreement.
Representatives of JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers then delivered
their oral opinions, which were subsequently confirmed in
writing, that, as of March 6, 2005, and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in their
opinions, the merger consideration to be received by our
stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement with BAE Systems
was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. The
full text of the written opinion of JPMorgan, dated
March 6, 2005, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion is attached as
Annex B to this proxy statement. The full text of the
written opinion of Lehman Brothers, dated March 6, 2005,
which sets forth the assumptions made, procedures followed,
matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken in
connection with the opinion is attached as Annex C to this
proxy statement.
After further deliberation and discussion, our board of
directors: determined that the terms of the merger, the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of, our
stockholders; declared the merger and the merger agreement
advisable; approved the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement; and recommended that our
19
stockholders adopt the merger agreement. The vote was unanimous,
except for one director, who did not participate in the meeting.
Later on March 6, we, BAE Systems, and Acquisition Sub
executed the definitive merger agreement. On March 7, 2005,
we and BAE Systems announced the execution of the merger
agreement.
Our Reasons for the Merger
Our board of directors unanimously (with one director not
participating):
|
|
|
|
|
approved the merger agreement, the merger, and the related
transactions; |
|
|
|
determined that the terms of the merger, the merger agreement,
and the related transactions are fair to and in the best
interests of our stockholders; |
|
|
|
declared the merger agreement and the merger advisable; and |
|
|
|
recommended that our stockholders adopt the merger agreement. |
In reaching its determination, our board of directors consulted
with our management, as well as our legal and financial
advisors, and considered the following material factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Other strategic alternatives available to us, including pursuing
growth through strategic corporate acquisitions and continuing
to operate as an independent public company. Although our board
of directors believed that our prospects remained strong as an
independent company, a sale of UDI as a whole at the price
offered by BAE Systems was more likely to maximize stockholder
value than remaining an independent company and other
alternatives. Moreover, our board of directors considered that
there were risks and uncertainties associated with remaining an
independent public company. |
|
|
|
The merger consideration of $75.00 per share to be received
by our stockholders represents a substantial premium to the
historic trading prices of our common stock. The merger
consideration represents a 28.7% premium over the closing price
of our common stock on March 4, 2005 (the last trading day
preceding the announcement of the merger agreement), a 43.3%
premium over the average closing price of our common stock over
the 30 calendar days preceding March 4, 2005, a 67.7%
premium over the average closing price of our common stock over
the 180 calendar days preceding March 4, 2005, and a 91.1%
premium over the average closing price of our common stock over
the one year period preceding March 4, 2005. |
|
|
|
The merger consideration consists solely of cash, which provides
certainty of value to our stockholders. |
|
|
|
The general terms and conditions of the merger agreement,
including the parties representations, warranties and
covenants, the conditions to their respective obligations as
well as the likelihood of the consummation of the merger, the
proposed transaction structure, the termination provisions of
the merger agreement, and our board of directors
evaluation of the likely time period necessary to close the
merger. |
|
|
|
BAE Systems obligation to consummate the merger is not
subject to any financing contingencies. |
|
|
|
Our board of directors view of BAE Systems ability
to fund the merger consideration either directly or with the
support of its ultimate parent company, BAE Parent. |
|
|
|
Our board of directors and managements view that it
is unlikely that any other party would propose to enter into a
transaction more favorable to our stockholders. |
|
|
|
Prior to adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders,
the merger agreement permits us, under certain conditions and
subject to certain requirements and rights of BAE Systems, to
provide information to, and negotiate with, any third party that
makes an unsolicited acquisition proposal if our board of
directors determines in good faith that the acquisition proposal
is reasonably likely to result in a superior proposal. |
|
|
|
Prior to adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders,
the merger agreement can be terminated by us if our board of
directors receives a superior proposal, subject to certain
requirements and rights of BAE Systems and payment of a
termination fee. |
20
|
|
|
|
|
The likelihood that the merger would be approved by the
requisite regulatory authorities. |
|
|
|
The presentation of JPMorgan on March 6, 2005 and its
opinion that, as of March 6, 2005, and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion,
the $75.00 in cash per share of UDI common stock to be received
by our stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement was fair,
from a financial point of view, to our stockholders. The full
text of the written opinion of JPMorgan, dated March 6,
2005, which sets forth the assumptions made, matters considered,
and limitations on the review undertaken in connection with the
opinion, is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement. |
|
|
|
The presentation of Lehman Brothers on March 6, 2005 and
its opinion that, as of March 6, 2005, and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion,
the $75.00 in cash per share of UDI common stock to be received
by our stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement was fair,
from a financial point of view, to our stockholders. The full
text of the written opinion of Lehman Brothers, dated
March 6, 2005, which sets forth the assumptions made,
matters considered, and limitations on the review undertaken in
connection with the opinion, is attached as Annex C to this
proxy statement. |
In the course of its deliberations, our board of directors also
considered a variety of risks and other potentially negative
factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The merger agreement precludes us from actively soliciting
alternative proposals, although, prior to adoption of the merger
agreement by our stockholders, our board of directors is
permitted to provide information to, and negotiate with, any
third party that makes an unsolicited acquisition proposal if
the board determines in good faith that the acquisition proposal
is reasonably likely to result in a superior proposal. |
|
|
|
We are obligated to pay BAE Systems a termination fee of
$119,233,768 if the merger agreement is terminated under certain
circumstances. It is possible that these provisions could
discourage a competing proposal to acquire us or reduce the
price in an alternative transaction. |
|
|
|
The merger consideration consists solely of cash and will
therefore generally be taxable to our U.S. stockholders for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, because our
stockholders are receiving cash for their stock, they will not
participate after the closing in future dividends, our future
growth, or the benefits of synergies potentially resulting from
the merger. |
|
|
|
The merger is subject to, among other things, the approval of
the shareholders of BAE Parent. |
|
|
|
Certain of our directors and executive officers may have
conflicts of interest in connection with the merger, as they may
receive certain benefits that are different from, and in
addition to, those of our other stockholders. See
Interests of Directors and Executive
Officers in the Merger. |
|
|
|
We may incur significant risks and costs if the merger does not
close, including the diversion of management and employee
attention during the period after the signing of the merger
agreement, potential employee attrition, and the potential
effect on our business and customer relations. In that regard,
under the merger agreement, we must conduct our business in the
ordinary course and we are subject to a variety of other
restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to completion
of the merger or termination of the merger agreement, which may
delay or prevent us from undertaking business opportunities that
may arise or preclude actions that would be advisable if we were
to remain an independent public company. |
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by our board of directors, while not exhaustive,
includes the material factors considered by our board. In view
of the variety of factors considered in connection with its
evaluation of the merger, our board of directors did not find it
practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign
relative or specific weights or values to any of these factors,
and individual directors may have given different weight to
different factors. It should be noted that this explanation of
our board of directors reasoning and other information
presented in this section is forward-looking in nature and,
therefore, should be read in light of the factors discussed
under the heading Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements.
21
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors
Our board of directors evaluated the factors described above,
including asking questions of our management and legal and
financial advisors. After careful consideration, our board of
directors (with one director not participating) unanimously
determined that the merger is advisable and fair to, and in the
best interests of, our stockholders, approved the merger
agreement, and recommended that our stockholders vote FOR
adoption of the merger agreement.
Opinion of Our Financial Advisors JPMorgan and
Lehman Brothers
On January 19, 2005, we contacted JPMorgan and Lehman
Brothers to request that each act as our financial advisor in
connection with the potential acquisition of our company. At the
meeting of our board of directors on March 6, 2005, each of
JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers rendered its oral opinion to our
board of directors, which was subsequently confirmed in writing,
that, as of such date, based upon and subject to the assumptions
made, matters considered and limits of the review undertaken by
JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers, the consideration to be paid to
holders of our common stock in the proposed merger was fair,
from a financial point of view, to such stockholders. No
limitations were imposed by our board of directors upon either
JPMorgan or Lehman Brothers with respect to the investigations
made or procedures followed by either of them in rendering their
respective opinions.
We have included as Annexes B and C the full text of the
separate, written opinions of each of JPMorgan and Lehman
Brothers dated as of March 6, 2005. We are incorporating
each such opinion into this proxy statement by reference. Each
opinion sets forth the assumptions made, matters considered, and
limits on the review undertaken by each financial advisor in
rendering its opinion. Our stockholders may refer to Annexes B
and C in order to read each opinion in its entirety.
JPMorgans and Lehman Brothers written opinions are
addressed to our board of directors, are directed only to the
consideration to be paid in the merger, and do not constitute a
recommendation to any of our stockholders as to how such
stockholder should vote at the annual meeting. The summary of
each of the opinions of JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers set forth
in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of each such opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, JPMorgan, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft dated March 5, 2005 of the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning UDI and the industries in which we
operate; |
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the merger with the
publicly available financial terms of certain transactions
involving companies JPMorgan deemed relevant and the
consideration received for such companies; |
|
|
|
compared our financial and operating performance with publicly
available information concerning certain other companies
JPMorgan deemed relevant and reviewed the current and historical
market prices of our common stock and certain publicly traded
securities of such other companies; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
prepared by our management relating to our business; and |
|
|
|
performed such other financial studies and analyses and
considered such other information as JPMorgan deemed appropriate
for the purposes of its opinion. |
JPMorgan also held discussions with certain members of our
management and the management of BAE Systems with respect to
certain aspects of the merger, and our past and current business
operations, our financial condition and future prospects and
operations, and certain other matters JPMorgan believed
necessary or appropriate to its inquiry.
JPMorgan relied upon and assumed, without assuming
responsibility or liability for independent verification, the
accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly
available or that we furnished to or discussed with JPMorgan and
BAE Systems or otherwise reviewed by or for JPMorgan. JPMorgan
did
22
not conduct and was not provided with any valuation or appraisal
of any assets or liabilities, nor did JPMorgan evaluate our
solvency or the solvency of BAE Systems under any state,
federal, or international laws relating to bankruptcy,
insolvency, or similar matters. In relying on financial analyses
and forecasts provided to it, JPMorgan assumed that they were
reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments by our management as
to our expected future results of operations and financial
condition to which such analyses or forecasts relate. JPMorgan
expressed no view as to such analyses or forecasts or the
assumptions on which they were based. JPMorgan also assumed that
the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will be consummated as described in the merger
agreement, and that the merger agreement, as executed, would not
differ in any material respect from the draft thereof provided
to JPMorgan. JPMorgan relied as to all legal matters relevant to
the rendering of its opinion upon the advice of counsel.
JPMorgan further assumed that all material governmental,
regulatory, or other consents and approvals necessary for the
consummation of the merger will be obtained without any adverse
effect on us or on the contemplated benefits of the merger.
The projections for UDI furnished to JPMorgan were prepared by
our management. We do not publicly disclose internal management
projections of the type provided to JPMorgan in connection with
JPMorgans analysis of the merger, and such projections
were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure or
compliance with published guidelines of the SEC or the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding prospective
financial information. These projections were based on numerous
variables and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and may
be beyond the control of our management, including, without
limitation, factors related to general economic and competitive
conditions and prevailing interest rates. Accordingly, actual
results could vary significantly from those set forth in such
projections.
JPMorgans opinion is based on economic, market, and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to JPMorgan as of, the date of such opinion. Subsequent
developments may affect JPMorgans opinion, and JPMorgan
does not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm such
opinion. JPMorgans opinion is limited to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be
received by the holders of our common stock in the proposed
merger, and JPMorgan has expressed no opinion as to the fairness
of the merger to, or any consideration of, the holders of any
other class of our securities, our creditors, or other of our
constituencies, or our underlying decision to engage in the
merger. JPMorgan expressed no opinion as to the price at which
our common stock will trade at any future time.
|
|
|
Opinion of Lehman Brothers |
In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers reviewed and
analyzed:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement and the specific terms of the merger,
including the necessary regulatory approvals; |
|
|
|
publicly available information concerning us that Lehman
Brothers believed to be relevant to its analysis, including, our
earnings announcement for the fiscal year 2004 that was filed on
Form 8-K on January 27, 2005, our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004; |
|
|
|
financial and operating information with respect to our
business, operations, and prospects furnished to Lehman Brothers
by us, including a draft of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004; |
|
|
|
a trading history of our common stock from its commencement of
trading on the NYSE on December 14, 2001 to March 4,
2005 and a comparison of that trading history with those of
other companies that Lehman Brothers deemed relevant; |
|
|
|
a comparison of our historical financial results and present
financial condition with those of other companies that Lehman
Brothers deemed relevant; |
|
|
|
a comparison of the financial terms of the merger with the
financial terms of certain other recent transactions that Lehman
Brothers deemed relevant; |
|
|
|
independent research analysts estimates of our future
financial performance published by The Institutional Brokers
Estimate System, or I/B/E/S; and |
23
|
|
|
|
|
the results of our efforts and the efforts of Lehman Brothers
and JPMorgan to solicit indications of interest from third
parties with respect to a sale of UDI. |
In addition, Lehman Brothers had discussions with our management
concerning our business, operations, assets, financial
condition, and prospects. Lehman Brothers also undertook such
other studies, analyses, and investigations as it deemed
appropriate.
In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers assumed and relied
upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other
information used by Lehman Brothers without assuming any
responsibility for independent verification of such information.
Lehman Brothers further relied upon the assurances of our
management that they were not aware of any facts or
circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or
misleading. With respect to our financial projections, upon our
advice, Lehman Brothers assumed that such projections had been
reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of our management as to our
future financial performance and that we will perform
substantially in accordance with such projections. Lehman
Brothers also assumed that our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the SEC would not differ in any material respect from the draft
thereof furnished to it. In arriving at its opinion, Lehman
Brothers did not conduct a physical inspection of our properties
and facilities and did not make or obtain any evaluations or
appraisals of our assets or liabilities. Lehman Brothers
opinion was necessarily based upon market, economic, and other
conditions as they existed on, and could be evaluated as of, the
date of its opinion.
The projections for UDI furnished to Lehman Brothers were
prepared by our management. We do not publicly disclose internal
management projections of the type provided to Lehman Brothers
in connection with Lehman Brothers analysis of the merger,
and such projections were not prepared with a view toward public
disclosure or compliance with published guidelines of the SEC or
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding
prospective financial information. These projections were based
on numerous variables and assumptions that are inherently
uncertain and may be beyond the control of our management,
including, without limitation, factors related to general
economic and competitive conditions and prevailing interest
rates. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from
those set forth in such projections.
|
|
|
Summary of the Financial Analyses Performed by Our
Financial Advisors |
In accordance with customary investment banking practice,
JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers employed generally accepted
valuation methods in reaching their respective opinions. The
following is a summary of the material financial analyses
utilized by JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers in connection with
providing their opinions. Considering any portion of such
analyses and of the factors considered, without considering all
analyses and factors, could create a misleading or incomplete
view of the process underlying the opinions.
JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers compared selected financial data of
UDI with similar publicly available data for selected publicly
traded companies engaged in businesses which JPMorgan and Lehman
Brothers judged to be analogous to our business. The following
companies were selected by JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers:
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing |
|
|
|
Lockheed Martin |
|
|
|
Northrop Grumman |
|
|
|
General Dynamics |
|
|
|
Raytheon |
|
|
|
L-3 Communications |
|
|
|
Alliant Techsystems |
|
|
|
DRS Technologies |
24
|
|
|
|
|
Armor Holdings |
|
|
|
EDO Corp. |
For each comparable company, JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers
calculated multiples of enterprise value over earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, referred to as
EBITDA, and multiples of share price over earnings per fully
diluted share, referred to as EPS, based upon estimates of
EBITDA and EPS for each of the calendar years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2006. JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers
applied a range of multiples derived from this analysis to our
projected EBITDA and EPS, as applicable, for each of the
calendar years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, yielding
implied stand-alone public market trading values for our common
stock of approximately $45.00 to $63.00 per fully diluted
share. These implied stand-alone public market trading values
did not include any value an acquiror may derive from
consolidated ownership such as synergies, cost savings, and
enhanced revenue opportunities, including sales outside the
United States.
|
|
|
Selected Transaction Analysis |
Using publicly available information, JPMorgan and Lehman
Brothers examined selected acquisitions and acquisition
proposals of companies in the defense industry. Specifically,
JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers reviewed the following transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Northrop Grummans acquisition of Newport News |
|
|
|
L-3 Communications acquisition of Aircraft Integration
Systems |
|
|
|
Our acquisition of United States Marine Repair |
|
|
|
General Dynamics acquisition of Advanced Technical Products |
|
|
|
Northrop Grummans acquisition of TRW |
|
|
|
General Dynamics acquisition of General Motors Defense |
|
|
|
DRS acquisition of Integrated Defense |
|
|
|
General Dynamics acquisition of Alvis (acquisition
proposed, but not consummated) |
|
|
|
BAE Parents acquisition of Alvis |
For each selected transaction, JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers
calculated multiples of transaction value to EBITDA for the
twelve months prior to the date of announcement. JPMorgan and
Lehman Brothers applied a range of multiples derived from this
analysis to our EBITDA for the twelve months ending
December 31, 2004, and arrived at an estimated range of
equity values of between $49.50 and $63.00 per fully
diluted share of our common stock.
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers conducted a discounted cash flow
analysis for the purpose of determining the equity value per
fully diluted share for our common stock. JPMorgan and Lehman
Brothers calculated the unlevered free cash flows that we are
expected to generate during fiscal years 2005 through 2009 based
upon financial projections prepared by our management for fiscal
years 2005 through 2007, extrapolated financial information
developed by JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers in collaboration with,
and approved by, our management for fiscal years 2008 and 2009,
and financial and other information from our public filings.
JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers also calculated a range of terminal
asset values of UDI at the end of the 5-year period ending
December 31, 2009 by applying a perpetual growth rate
ranging from 1.00% to 2.50% of our unlevered free cash flow
during the final year of the 5-year period.
The unlevered free cash flows and the range of terminal asset
values were then discounted to present values using discount
rates ranging from 8.50% to 9.00%, which range was based upon an
analysis of our weighted average cost of capital. The present
value of the unlevered free cash flows and the range of terminal
asset values were then adjusted for our cash and cash
equivalents and total debt, yielding a range of equity values of
between $52.00 and $67.25 per fully diluted share of our
common stock. At the midpoint of the discount rate range, the
equity value range was between $53.50 and $64.50 per fully
diluted share of our
25
common stock. These equity values per fully diluted share of our
common stock did not include the value an aquiror may derive
from synergies, cost savings, and enhanced revenue
opportunities, such as additional sales outside the United
States.
The summary set forth above does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses or data presented by JPMorgan and
Lehman Brothers. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a
complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial
analysis or summary description. Furthermore, in arriving at
their opinions, JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers did not attribute
any particular weight to any analysis or factor they considered,
but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and
relevance of each analysis and factor. JPMorgan and Lehman
Brothers believe that the summary set forth above and their
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions thereof, without considering all of their analyses,
could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying
their analyses and opinions. JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers based
their analyses on assumptions that they deemed reasonable,
including assumptions concerning general business and economic
conditions and industry-specific factors. The other principal
assumptions upon which JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers based their
analyses are set forth above under the description of each such
analysis. JPMorgans and Lehman Brothers analyses are
not necessarily indicative of actual values or actual future
results that might be achieved, which values may be higher or
lower than those indicated. Moreover, JPMorgans and Lehman
Brothers analyses are not and do not purport to be
appraisals or otherwise reflective of the prices at which
businesses actually could be bought or sold.
As a part of their respective investment banking businesses,
JPMorgan and its affiliates and Lehman Brothers and its
affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for
estate, corporate, and other purposes. JPMorgan and Lehman
Brothers were each selected to advise us with respect to the
merger on the basis of such experience and familiarity with the
defense industry and UDI in particular.
JPMorgan, Lehman Brothers, and their respective affiliates, in
the ordinary course of their business have, from time to time,
provided, and in the future may continue to provide, commercial
and investment banking services to us, BAE Systems, and their
respective affiliates, in each case for customary compensation.
In the ordinary course of their businesses, JPMorgan, Lehman
Brothers, and their respective affiliates may actively trade the
debt and equity securities of UDI or BAE Systems for their own
account or for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, they
may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities.
For services rendered in connection with the merger, we agreed
to pay each of JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers an engagement fee of
$250,000, which was payable upon execution of the engagement
letter, an opinion fee of $1.5 million, which was payable
upon delivery of its respective fairness opinion, and a
transaction fee of approximately $9.5 million, which is
payable upon the consummation of the merger. In addition, we
agreed to reimburse each of JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers for its
reasonable expenses incurred in connection with its services,
including the fees and disbursements of counsel, and will
indemnify each of JPMorgan and Lehman Brothers against certain
liabilities arising out of its engagement, including liabilities
arising under federal securities laws.
Financing Condition
The merger is not conditioned on BAE Systems ability to
obtain financing.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger to Our U.S. Stockholders
The following is a general discussion of the material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to
U.S. holders (as defined below) whose shares of our common
stock are converted into the right to receive cash consideration
of $75.00 per share in the merger. This discussion is based
on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, or the Code, Treasury Regulations and administrative
and judicial interpretations thereof all as in effect on the
date hereof, and all of which are subject to change, possibly
with retroactive effect. This discussion addresses only persons
that hold shares of our common stock
26
as a capital asset (generally, property held for investment) and
does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income
taxation that may be relevant in light of a particular
U.S. holders special tax status or situation. In
particular, this discussion does not address the tax
consequences to non-U.S. holders, dealers in securities,
banks or other financial institutions, insurance companies,
tax-exempt organizations, partnerships or other pass-through
entities, investors that hold shares of our common stock as part
of a hedge, straddle or conversion transaction and stockholders
who acquired shares of our common stock pursuant to the exercise
of options or otherwise as compensation or through a
tax-qualified retirement plan. This discussion does not address
any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local
or foreign jurisdiction.
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. holder
is any individual, corporation, estate or trust that is a holder
of our common stock and that is, for United States federal
income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized
under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the
District of Columbia; |
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income
tax regardless of its source; or |
|
|
|
a trust (a) if a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the trusts administration and one
or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust; or (b) which has a
valid election in place to be treated as a U.S. person. |
If our common stock is held by a partnership or other
pass-through entity, the U.S. federal income tax treatment
of a partner or owner of such partnership or other pass-through
entity generally will depend upon the status of the partner or
owner and the activities of the partnership or pass-through
entity. Accordingly, we urge partnerships and other pass-through
entities that are holders of our common stock, and partners or
owners in such partnerships or pass-through entities, to consult
their own tax advisors regarding the consequences to them of the
merger.
You should consult your tax advisor in determining the tax
consequences of the merger, including the application of
U.S. federal income tax considerations, as well as the
application of state, local, foreign and other tax laws.
The receipt of cash for shares of our common stock in the merger
will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. In general, a U.S. holder whose shares of our
common stock are converted into the right to receive cash
pursuant to the merger will recognize capital gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to the difference,
if any, between the amount of cash received and the
U.S. holders adjusted tax basis in the shares of our
common stock converted into the right to receive cash pursuant
to the merger. Gain or loss will be determined separately for
each block of shares (i.e., shares acquired at the same
cost in a single transaction) converted into the right to
receive cash in the merger. Such gain or loss will be long-term
capital gain or loss provided that a U.S. holders
holding period for such shares is more than 12 months at
the time of the completion of the merger. Long-term capital
gains of individuals are eligible for reduced rates of taxation.
There are limitations on the deductibility of capital losses.
Backup withholding will apply to all cash payments to which a
U.S. holder is entitled pursuant to the merger agreement,
unless such U.S. holder provides a taxpayer identification
number (Social Security number, in the case of individuals, or
employer identification number, in the case of other
stockholders), certifies under penalty of perjury that such
number is correct, and otherwise complies with the backup
withholding tax rules. Each of our U.S. holders should
complete and sign the Substitute Form W-9 which will be
included as part of the letter of transmittal and return it to
the paying agent, in order to provide the information and
certification necessary to avoid backup withholding tax, unless
an exemption applies and is established in a manner satisfactory
to the paying agent. Stockholders who are not U.S. holders
should consult their tax advisors regarding the applicability of
the backup withholding rules to their situation, including the
proper documentation, if any, needed to avoid backup withholding.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a
refund or a credit against your U.S. federal income tax
liability provided the required information is furnished to the
Internal Revenue Service.
27
U.S. holders considering the exercise of their appraisal
rights should consult their own tax advisors concerning the
application of U.S. federal income tax laws to their
particular situations as well as any consequences of the
exercise of such rights arising under the laws of any other
taxing jurisdiction.
The discussion set forth above is included for general
information purposes only and may not be applicable to you
depending on your particular situation. You should consult the
your tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of the merger
including the tax consequences under state, local, foreign and
other tax laws and the possible effects of changes in
U.S. federal or other tax laws.
Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger
In considering the recommendation of our board of directors with
respect to the merger agreement, holders of shares of our common
stock should be aware that our executive officers and directors
have interests in the merger and arrangements that are different
from, or in addition to, those of our stockholders generally.
These interests and arrangements may create potential conflicts
of interest. Our board was aware of these potential conflicts of
interest and considered them, among other matters, in reaching
its decision to approve the merger agreement and to recommend
that our stockholders vote FOR adoption of the merger
agreement.
|
|
|
Stock Options and Restricted Stock |
The merger agreement provides that at the completion of the
merger each option, whether vested or unvested, to purchase
shares of our common stock, including those options that our
executive officers and directors hold, will be canceled in
exchange for a cash payment, without interest, to the option
holder equal to the excess of $75.00 over the exercise price of
the stock option for each share of our common stock subject to
the option. BAE Systems has agreed to make the payments
described in the foregoing sentence within 15 days of
completion of the merger.
In addition, the merger agreement provides that at the
completion of the merger all outstanding shares of restricted
stock, including those held by our executive officers and
directors, will vest immediately prior to the completion of the
merger and will be treated in the same manner in the merger as
other outstanding shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
Employment Agreements and Severance Agreements |
|
|
|
Employment Agreements with Messrs. Rabaut, Raborn,
Krekich, Kolovat, and Wagner |
We maintain employment agreements with each of the following
executive officers providing for annual base salaries in the
listed amounts: Thomas W. Rabaut, $600,000; Francis Raborn,
$340,000; Alexander J. Krekich, $288,750; David V. Kolovat,
$238,117; and Dennis A. Wagner III, $215,313. Each of these
employment agreements automatically renews annually for
successive one-year periods unless either party delivers notice
within specified periods. Each of these executive officers is
also entitled to participate in an annual management incentive
plan established by the compensation committee of our board of
directors, to receive bonuses under such plan, and to
participate in our employee benefit plans.
Under Messrs. Rabauts, Raborns, Krekichs,
Kolovats, and Wagners employment agreements, if the
applicable executives employment is terminated by us
without cause or by the executive for good reason, each as
defined in the agreements, the executive is entitled to receive
base salary for three years, in the case of Messrs. Rabaut
and Raborn, and two years in the case of Messrs. Krekich,
Kolovat, and Wagner, in each case, a severance period, along
with their target bonuses for the severance period, a pro rata
target bonus for the year of termination, continued employee
benefits for the severance period, and an additional
gross-up lump sum payment to cover the costs of
excise taxes, if any, to which these officers may be subject.
|
|
|
Severance Agreements with Messrs. Doty and Howe |
UDI maintains severance agreements with each of
Messrs. Elmer I. Doty and Keith B. Howe. Pursuant to the
terms of these agreements, Messrs. Doty and Howe are
entitled to a stated termination payment if, during a two year
period of time after we enter into an agreement to effect a
corporate transaction, such as the merger, the executives
employment is terminated either by us without cause, or by the
executive for good reason, each as defined in the agreements.
This termination payment is the greater of either the amount of
28
payment that the executive would otherwise be entitled to under
our general severance policy or an amount equal to the sum of
the executives annual base salary plus the amount of his
annual bonus and a prorated bonus to which he is entitled under
our management incentive plan.
|
|
|
Indemnification of Officers and Directors |
BAE Systems has agreed that it will, to the fullest extent
permitted by law, honor or cause the surviving corporation in
the merger to honor all our obligations to indemnify (including
any obligations to advance funds for expenses) our current or
former directors or officers for acts or omissions by such
directors and officers occurring prior to completion of the
merger to the extent that such obligations exist on the date of
the merger agreement, and these obligations will survive the
merger and continue in full force and effect until the
expiration of the applicable statute of limitations with respect
to any claims against such directors and officers arising out of
such acts or omissions. In the event that the surviving
corporation in the merger or BAE Systems consolidates with or
merges into another person and is not the surviving entity, or
transfers all or substantially all of its assets to another
person, the surviving corporation or BAE Systems has agreed to
make proper provision so that the successors and assigns of the
surviving corporation or BAE Systems will assume the obligations
described above.
In the merger agreement, BAE Systems has further agreed that,
for a period of six years after the merger, BAE Systems will
cause the surviving corporation in the merger to maintain in
effect directors and officers liability insurance
with at least the same coverage and containing amounts and terms
and conditions no less advantageous in the aggregate to those
officers and directors than the coverage and terms and
conditions of the policies maintained by us with respect to
matters arising at or before completion of the merger; however,
BAE Systems is not obligated to pay annual premiums in excess of
$3,181,908, which is 300% of the annual premium for this
insurance paid by us prior to the date of the merger agreement.
In the event that BAE Systems is unable to maintain such
insurance for the maximum premium indicated in the preceding
sentence, BAE Systems has agreed to obtain the most advantageous
directors and officers insurance policy obtainable
for an annual premium equal to the maximum premium.
|
|
|
Post-Merger Opportunities |
Mr. Rabaut has been offered the position of head of BAE
Systems global land systems business following the merger.
Discussions regarding the terms on which Mr. Rabaut would
take on this role are in progress and no definitive agreement
has been reached by the parties. Additionally, discussions have
commenced regarding BAE Systems potential employment of
other UDI executive officers.
BAE Systems has begun discussions with one or more members of
our current board of directors about joining the board of
directors of BAE Systems following completion of the merger.
Appraisal Rights
Under the DGCL, if you do not wish to accept the cash payment
provided for in the merger agreement, you have the right to seek
appraisal of your UDI common stock and to receive the fair
value of those shares in cash as determined by the
Delaware Court of Chancery, or the Chancery Court, in lieu of
the merger consideration. Holders of our common stock electing
to exercise appraisal rights must comply with the provisions of
Section 262 of the DGCL, or Section 262, in order to
perfect their rights.
The following is intended as a brief summary of the material
provisions of the Delaware statutory procedures required to be
followed by a stockholder in order to perfect appraisal rights.
This summary, however, is not a complete statement of all
applicable requirements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to Section 262, the full text of which appears in
Annex D of this proxy statement. Failure to follow
precisely any of the statutory requirements set forth in
Annex D may result in termination or waiver of appraisal
rights.
Section 262 requires that holders of record of our common
stock be notified that appraisal rights will be available not
less than 20 days before the annual meeting to vote on the
merger agreement. A copy of Section 262 must be included
with such notice. This proxy statement constitutes our notice to
our stockholders of the availability of appraisal rights in
connection with the merger in compliance with the
29
requirements of Section 262. If you wish to consider
exercising your appraisal rights, you should carefully review
the text of Section 262 contained in Annex D since
failure to timely and properly comply precisely with the
requirements of Section 262 will result in the loss of your
appraisal rights under Delaware law.
If you elect to demand appraisal of your shares, you must
satisfy each of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
You must deliver to us a written demand for appraisal of your
shares before the vote on the merger agreement is taken. A
demand for appraisal must reasonably inform us of the identity
of the holder of record of our common stock and that such holder
intends thereby to demand appraisal of his or her shares of our
common stock. This written demand for appraisal must be in
addition to and separate from any proxy or vote abstaining from
or voting against approval and adoption of the merger agreement
and the merger. Voting against or failing to vote for approval
and adoption of the merger agreement and the merger by itself
does not constitute a demand for appraisal within the meaning of
Section 262. |
|
|
|
You must not vote in favor of adoption of the merger agreement.
A vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement, by
proxy or in person, will constitute a waiver of your appraisal
rights in respect of the shares so voted and will nullify any
previously filed written demands for appraisal. |
If you fail to comply with either of these conditions and the
merger is completed, you will be entitled to receive the merger
consideration for your shares of our common stock as provided
for in the merger agreement, but you will have no appraisal
rights with respect to your shares of our common stock.
All demands for appraisal should be addressed to United Defense
Industries, Inc. at 1525 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 700,
Arlington, Virginia 22209, Attention: Secretary, before the vote
on the merger agreement is taken at the annual meeting, and
should be executed by, or on behalf of, the record holder of the
shares of our common stock for which appraisal is sought.
To be effective, a demand for appraisal by a holder of our
common stock must be made by, or in the name of, such record
stockholder, fully and correctly, as such holders name
appears on his or her stock certificate(s). Beneficial owners
who do not also hold of record may not directly demand
appraisal. The beneficial holder must, in such cases, have the
record holder submit the required demand in respect of those
shares. If shares are owned of record in a fiduciary
capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, execution
of a demand for appraisal must be made in that capacity; and if
the shares are owned of record by more than one person, as in a
joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the demand must be executed
by or for all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an
authorized agent for two or more joint owners, may execute the
demand for appraisal for a record stockholder; however, the
agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly
disclose the fact that, in executing the demand, he or she is
acting as agent for the record owner. A record owner, such as a
broker, who holds shares as a nominee for others, may exercise
his or her right of appraisal with respect to the shares held
for one or more beneficial owners, while not exercising this
right for other beneficial owners. In that case, the written
demand should state the number of shares as to which appraisal
is sought. Where no number of shares is expressly mentioned, the
demand will be presumed to cover all shares held in the name of
the record owner.
If you hold your shares of our common stock in a brokerage
account or in other nominee form and you wish to exercise
appraisal rights, you should consult with your broker or the
other nominee to determine the appropriate procedures for the
making of a demand for appraisal by the nominee.
Within 10 days after the completion of the merger, the
surviving corporation must give written notice that the merger
has become effective to each record stockholder who has properly
filed a written demand for appraisal and who did not vote in
favor of the merger. At any time within 60 days after the
completion of the merger, any record stockholder who has
demanded an appraisal has the right to withdraw the demand and
to accept the merger consideration for his or her shares of our
common stock. Within 120 days after the completion of the
merger, either the surviving corporation or any record
stockholder who has complied with the requirements of
Section 262 may file a petition in the Chancery Court
demanding a determination of the fair value of the shares held
by all stockholders entitled to appraisal. The surviving
corporation has no obligation to file such a petition in the
event there are record stockholders seeking appraisal.
Accordingly, the
30
failure of a stockholder to file such a petition within the
period specified could nullify the stockholders previously
written demand for appraisal.
If a petition for appraisal is duly filed by a record
stockholder and a copy of the petition is served on the
surviving corporation, the surviving corporation will then be
obligated, within 20 days after such service of a copy of
the petition, to provide the Chancery Court with a duly verified
list containing the names and addresses of all record
stockholders who have demanded appraisal of their shares. After
notice to record stockholders who have demanded appraisal of
their shares, the Chancery Court is empowered to conduct a
hearing upon the petition, and to determine those record
stockholders who have complied with Section 262 and who
have become entitled to the appraisal rights provided thereby.
The Chancery Court may require the record stockholders who have
demanded appraisal of their shares to submit their stock
certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of
the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any
stockholder fails to comply with that direction, the Chancery
Court may dismiss the proceedings as to that stockholder.
After determination of the record stockholders entitled to
appraisal of their shares of our common stock, the Chancery
Court will appraise the shares, determining their fair value
exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with a
fair rate of interest. When the value is determined, the
Chancery Court will direct the payment of such value, with
interest thereon accrued, if any, as the Chancery Court so
determines, to the record stockholders entitled to receive the
same, upon surrender by such holders of the stock certificates
with respect to those shares.
In determining fair value, the Chancery Court is required to
take into account all relevant factors. You should be aware
that the fair value of your shares as determined under
Section 262 could be more, the same, or less than the
merger consideration that you are entitled to receive under the
terms of the merger agreement.
Costs of the appraisal proceeding may be imposed upon the
surviving corporation and the stockholders participating in the
appraisal proceeding by the Chancery Court as the Chancery Court
deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon the application of a
record stockholder, the Chancery Court may order all or a
portion of the expenses incurred by any record stockholder in
connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without
limitation, reasonable attorneys fees and the fees and
expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of
all shares entitled to appraisal. Any stockholder who had
demanded appraisal rights will not, after completion of the
merger, be entitled to vote shares subject to that demand for
any purpose or to receive payments of dividends or any other
distribution with respect to those shares, other than with
respect to payment to holders of record as of a date prior to
the completion of the merger; however, if no petition for
appraisal is filed within 120 days after the completion of
the merger, or if a record stockholder delivers a written
withdrawal of his or her demand for appraisal and an acceptance
of the terms of the merger within 60 days after completion
of the merger, then the right of that stockholder to appraisal
will cease and that stockholder will be entitled to receive the
merger consideration for shares of his or her shares of our
common stock pursuant to the merger agreement. Any withdrawal of
a demand for appraisal made more than 60 days after
completion of the merger may only be made with the written
approval of the surviving corporation. No appraisal proceeding
in the Chancery Court will be dismissed as to any record
stockholder without the approval of the Chancery Court, and such
approval may be subject to such conditions as the Chancery Court
deems just.
Form of the Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and
in accordance with the DGCL, at the time the merger becomes
effective, Acquisition Sub will merge with and into UDI. UDI
will survive the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of BAE
Systems.
Conversion of Shares; Procedures for Exchange of
Certificates
The conversion of our common stock into the right to receive the
merger consideration in cash, without interest, will occur
automatically at the time the merger becomes effective. As soon
as reasonably practicable thereafter, the paying agent for the
merger consideration will send a letter of transmittal to each
holder of record of a certificate or certificates of our common
stock. The letter of transmittal will contain instructions for
31
obtaining cash in exchange for shares of our common stock.
Stockholders should not return stock certificates before
receiving the letter of transmittal.
In the event of a transfer of ownership of our common stock that
is not registered in the records of our transfer agent, the cash
consideration for such shares of our common stock may be paid to
a person other than the person in whose name the certificate so
surrendered is registered if:
|
|
|
|
|
the certificate is properly endorsed or otherwise is in proper
form for transfer; and |
|
|
|
the person requesting such payment (a) pays any transfer or
other taxes resulting from the payment to a person other than
the registered holder of the certificate or (b) establishes
to BAE Systems satisfaction that the tax has been paid or
is not applicable. |
The cash paid upon conversion of shares of our common stock will
be issued in full satisfaction of all rights relating to the
shares of our common stock.
Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger
The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976
and related rules provide that transactions such as the merger
may not be completed until certain information has been
submitted to the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust
Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and specified
waiting period requirements have been satisfied. On
March 14, 2005, we and BAE Systems each filed a
Notification and Report Form with the Antitrust Division and the
Federal Trade Commission and requested an early termination of
the waiting period. If early termination is not granted, the
waiting period will expire at 11:59 p.m. on April 13,
2005 unless a request for additional information is made.
Under Exon-Florio, the President of the United States is
authorized to prohibit or suspend acquisitions, mergers or
takeovers by foreign persons of persons engaged in interstate
commerce in the United States if the President determines, after
investigation, that such foreign persons in exercising control
of such acquired persons might take action that threatens to
impair the national security of the United States and that other
provisions of existing law do not provide adequate authority to
protect national security. Pursuant to Exon-Florio, notice of an
acquisition by a foreign person is to be made to CFIUS. CFIUS is
comprised of representatives from 12 government entities,
including the Departments of the Treasury, State, Commerce,
Defense, Homeland Security and Justice, the Office of Management
and Budget, the United States Trade Representatives Office
and the Council of Economic Advisors. CFIUS has been selected by
the President to administer Exon-Florio. Notice of the
acquisition may be submitted to CFIUS either voluntarily by the
parties to such proposed acquisition, merger or takeover or by
any member of CFIUS. On March 16, 2005, we and BAE Systems
filed a joint voluntary notification with CFIUS. Unless CFIUS
takes further action, the waiting period will expire at
11:59 p.m. on April 15, 2005.
The Swedish Competition Act provides that transactions such as
the merger may not be completed until certain information has
been submitted to the Swedish Competition Authority, and the
Swedish Competition Authority has decided not to oppose the
merger. BAE Parent filed the required notification with the
Swedish Competition Authority on March 30, 2005. The
Swedish Competition Authority must decide within 25 working days
of the filing of the required notification whether to oppose the
merger or to initiate an in-depth investigation.
The Law on Protection of Competition of Turkey provides that
transactions such as the merger may not be completed until
certain information has been submitted to the Turkish
Competition Authority, and the Turkish Competition Authority has
cleared the merger. BAE Parent filed the required notification
with the Turkish Competition Authority on March 31, 2005.
The Turkish Competition Authority must decide either to clear
the merger or to initiate an in-depth investigation within
30 days from the date of filing of the notification.
In addition, BAE Parent has made a filing with respect to the
merger with the relevant authorities in Germany, under its Act
Against Restraints on Competition, and BAE Systems has made a
filing with respect to the merger with the relevant authorities
in Norway, under the Norwegian Competition Act.
UDI and BAE Parent also intend to make filings in Japan, under
its Act Concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and
Maintenance of Fair Trade and with Japans Ministry of
Finance, and in South Korea, under its Monopoly Regulation and
Fair Trade Act. The merger may be completed prior to the
32
clearance by the relevant authorities in these jurisdictions,
but the relevant authority retains jurisdiction following
completion of the merger to assess the competitive impact of the
merger.
Under the merger agreement, both UDI and BAE Systems have agreed
to use their reasonable best efforts to obtain all required
governmental approvals and avoid any action or proceeding by a
governmental entity in connection with the execution of the
merger agreement and completion of the merger. Notwithstanding
the above, neither BAE Systems nor any of its affiliates,
including Acquisition Sub, shall be required to agree to
(i) any prohibition, limitation, or restriction on, or
requirement related to, the ownership or operation by us, BAE
Systems, or any of our or its affiliates of any material portion
of the business or assets of us or BAE Systems or any of our or
its affiliates, (ii) any requirement compelling us, BAE
Systems, or any of our or its affiliates to dispose of or hold
separate any material portion of the business or assets of us,
BAE Systems, or any of our or its affiliates, as a result of the
merger or the related transactions, (iii) any limitations
on the ability of BAE Systems to acquire, hold, and exercise
full rights of ownership over any of the shares of the capital
stock of the surviving corporation, or (iv) any prohibition
on the ability of BAE Systems or any of its affiliates to
effectively control in any material respect the business or
operations of the surviving corporation.
Except as noted above with respect to the required filings under
the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, a review under Exon-Florio, other
foreign governmental filings, and the filing of a certificate of
merger in Delaware at or before the effective date of the
merger, we are unaware of any material approvals of federal,
state, or foreign governmental entities required for the
completion of the merger.
33
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
This section of the proxy statement describes the material
provisions of the merger agreement but does not purport to
describe all the provisions of the merger agreement. The
following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the complete text of the merger agreement, which is attached as
Annex A to the proxy statement and is incorporated into the
proxy statement by reference. We urge you to read the full text
of the merger agreement because it is the legal document that
governs the merger. The merger agreement has been included to
provide you with information regarding its terms. It is not
intended to provide you with any other factual information about
us. Such information can be found elsewhere in this proxy
statement and in the other public filings we make with the SEC,
which are available without charge at www.sec.gov.
Structure and Effective Time of the Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement,
Acquisition Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of BAE Systems, will
merge with and into UDI, with UDI continuing as the surviving
corporation. As a result of the merger, we will cease to be a
publicly traded company and will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of BAE Systems. The merger will be effective at the
time a certificate of merger is duly filed with the office of
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (or at a later
time, if agreed upon by the parties and specified in the
certificate of merger filed with the Secretary of State).
Merger Consideration
Upon completion of the merger, each issued and outstanding share
of our common stock not owned by UDI, BAE Systems, or
Acquisition Sub, or any of their respective wholly owned
subsidiaries, will be converted into the right to receive $75.00
in cash, without interest. BAE Parent executed and delivered to
us, concurrent with the execution and delivery of the merger
agreement, a letter containing specified undertakings, including
without limitation, its irrevocable and unconditional guarantee
to us of BAE Systems and Acquisition Subs obligation
to pay the merger consideration in accordance with the merger
agreement.
Directors and Officers
Upon completion of the merger, the directors of Acquisition Sub
will be the directors of the surviving corporation until they
resign, are removed, or their respective successors are duly
qualified and elected. Our officers immediately prior to the
merger will be the officers of the surviving corporation until
they resign, are removed, or their respective successors are
duly qualified and elected. The bylaws of Acquisition Sub will
govern the filling of any vacancies in the board of directors
and the appointment of new officers.
Treatment of Stock Options and Restricted Stock
Upon completion of the merger, each unexercised option (whether
vested or unvested) will be cancelled and converted into the
right to receive a cash payment, without interest, equal to the
product of (a) the excess, if any, of $75.00 over the
exercise price per share and (b) the number of shares of
our common stock that the holder could have purchased pursuant
to such options, less any applicable withholding tax.
Upon completion of the merger, each share of our restricted
stock outstanding will become fully vested and free of
restrictions on transfer, and the holder thereof will be
entitled to receive the merger consideration.
Stockholders Seeking Appraisal
The merger agreement provides that those stockholders who are
entitled to demand and properly demand appraisal will not have
the right to receive the merger consideration, but will receive
payment in cash for the fair value of their shares of common
stock as determined in accordance with Delaware law. If a holder
fails to perfect, waives, withdraws or loses his or her right to
appraisal of the common stock after completion of the merger,
his or her shares will be treated as if they had been converted
into and are exchangeable for the right to receive the merger
consideration without interest and the stockholders right
to appraisal will be extinguished.
We must give BAE Systems prompt notice of demands for appraisal
and we may not make a payment with respect to a demand for
appraisal or settle any such demands without BAE Systems
prior written consent.
34
Payment for the Shares
BAE Systems will designate a paying agent reasonably
satisfactory to us to make payment of the merger consideration
as contemplated by the merger agreement. Upon completion of the
merger, BAE Systems will provide or cause to be provided to the
paying agent the funds appropriate to pay the merger
consideration to the stockholders on a timely basis.
As soon as reasonably practicable after the completion of the
merger, the paying agent will send to holders of record of our
common stock a letter of transmittal and instructions on how to
surrender your certificates in exchange for the merger
consideration. The paying agent will promptly pay the merger
consideration to holders of record of our common stock after
they have: (1) surrendered their certificate(s) to the
paying agent and (2) provided to the paying agent a
properly completed letter of transmittal and any other items
specified by the letter of transmittal. Interest will not be
paid or accrue in respect of cash payments. The amount of any
merger consideration paid to holders of record of our common
stock will be reduced by any applicable withholding taxes.
You should not forward your stock certificates to the paying
agent without a letter of transmittal.
If the paying agent is to pay some or all of the merger
consideration to a person other than the holder of record of
shares of our common stock, that holder must have its
certificate(s) properly endorsed or otherwise in proper form for
transfer and must pay any transfer or other taxes payable by
reason of the transfer or establish to BAE Systems
satisfaction that the taxes have been paid or are not required
to be paid.
The letter of transmittal instructions will contain instructions
with respect to lost, stolen or destroyed certificate(s). You
will have to provide an affidavit of that fact and, if required
by BAE Systems, post a bond in an amount that BAE Systems may
reasonably direct as indemnity against any claim that may be
made against it in respect of the certificate.
Representations and Warranties
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties
made by us to BAE Systems and Acquisition Sub. The
representations and warranties are not intended to provide you
with factual information about our company. Moreover,
information concerning the subject matter of the representations
and warranties may have changed since the date of the agreement,
which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected
in our public disclosures. The representations and warranties
include representations and warranties relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
our and our subsidiaries organization, standing and power,
and other corporate matters; |
|
|
|
our and our subsidiaries capitalization; |
|
|
|
the authorization, execution, delivery, and enforceability of
the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts or violations under our organizational
documents, contracts, instruments or law, and required consents
and approvals; |
|
|
|
the filing of all reports, schedules, forms, statements, and
other documents required to be filed with the SEC and the
accuracy of the information in those documents; |
|
|
|
the absence of undisclosed liabilities; |
|
|
|
the maintenance of internal accounting controls and disclosure
controls and procedures; |
|
|
|
the accuracy and completeness of the information supplied for
this proxy statement and the circular distributed to
shareholders of BAE Parent; |
|
|
|
the conduct of our business since December 31, 2004 and the
absence of certain changes related thereto; |
|
|
|
tax matters; |
|
|
|
employee benefit plans and labor relations and compliance with
applicable laws relating thereto; |
|
|
|
the absence of proceedings, audits, inquiries and investigations
against us; |
|
|
|
our compliance with applicable laws; |
35
|
|
|
|
|
our compliance with environmental matters; |
|
|
|
our material contracts; |
|
|
|
our customers and suppliers; |
|
|
|
our title to properties; |
|
|
|
our intellectual property; |
|
|
|
the brokers and finders fees and other expenses
payable by us with respect to the merger; and |
|
|
|
our receipt of fairness opinions. |
The merger agreement also contains representations and
warranties made by BAE Systems and Acquisition Sub to us,
including representations and warranties relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
organization, standing and power, and other corporate matters; |
|
|
|
Acquisition Subs limited business conduct and its
capitalization; |
|
|
|
authorization, execution, delivery, and enforceability of the
merger agreement, subject to the approval of holders of not less
than a majority of ordinary shares of BAE Parent present in
person or by proxy who are entitled to vote at a meeting of the
shareholders of BAE Parent; |
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts or violations under charter documents,
contracts, instruments, or law, and required consents and
approvals, subject to the approval of holders of ordinary shares
of BAE Parent; |
|
|
|
the accuracy and completeness of information supplied for this
proxy statement and the circular distributed to shareholders of
BAE Parent; |
|
|
|
the brokers and finders fees payable by BAE Systems
with respect to the merger; |
|
|
|
BAE Systems and Acquisition Subs ownership of our
common stock; and |
|
|
|
BAE Systems financial capability to pay the aggregate
merger consideration. |
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
From the date of the merger agreement through the time the
merger becomes effective or, if earlier, the termination of the
merger agreement, we have agreed (and have agreed to cause our
subsidiaries), except as expressly permitted or expressly
contemplated by the merger agreement or except as BAE Systems
shall otherwise expressly consent, to conduct our business in
the usual, regular, and ordinary course in all material respects
consistent with past practice and to use our reasonable efforts
to preserve intact in all material respects our business
organization, keep available the services of our current key
officers and employees and keep our relationships with those
having business relationships with us.
In addition, during the same period, we have agreed that,
subject to certain exceptions, without the prior written consent
of BAE Systems, we will not, and will not permit our
subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
declare, set aside, or pay any dividend or other distribution in
respect of any of our capital stock other than dividends and
distributions by one of our direct or indirect wholly owned
subsidiaries to its parent and quarterly cash dividends payable
to our stockholders in an amount not to exceed $0.125 per
share of our common stock; |
|
|
|
effect any reorganization or recapitalization or split, combine,
or reclassify any of our capital stock; |
|
|
|
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of our capital
stock or other voting securities or equity interests of us or
our subsidiaries or any awards, warrants, calls, options or
similar rights of value; |
|
|
|
issue, deliver, sell, grant, pledge or otherwise encumber or
subject to any lien any shares of capital stock or other
ownership interests of any class (other than the issuance of
common stock upon the exercise of outstanding options as of the
date of the merger agreement and in accordance with their
terms), securities convertible or exchangeable into capital
stock or other ownership interests, or any awards, warrants,
calls, options, or other similar rights of value; |
|
|
|
amend our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or other
comparable organizational documents; |
36
|
|
|
|
|
acquire or agree to acquire (by merger, consolidation or
purchase of stock or assets) any business or any corporation,
partnership or other business organization or division, or
acquire any assets, in each case, that are material,
individually or in the aggregate, to us and our subsidiaries
taken as a whole, other than the possible acquisition disclosed
to BAE Systems prior to the date of the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
take the following employee-benefits related actions: |
|
|
|
|
|
adopt, enter into, amend or terminate any collective bargaining
agreement (except for the entry into of collective bargaining
agreements negotiated in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice), benefit plan, other agreement or
policy involving us or our subsidiaries and present or former
directors, officers or, except in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, any employees or
consultants; |
|
|
|
except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, increase the compensation, bonus, or fringe or other
benefits payable or to become payable to, or pay any bonus to,
any of our present or former directors, officers, employees, or
consultants; |
|
|
|
grant or pay any change of control, severance or termination
compensation to, or increase such compensation of, any present
or former director, officer, employee, or consultant, other than
in accordance with our severance policy in effect at the time of
the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
take any action to fund or secure payment, or to accelerate the
vesting or payment, of compensation or benefits under any
benefit plan, except withdrawals by individual participants in
our non-qualified deferred compensation plans; or |
|
|
|
materially change any actuarial or other assumption used to
calculate funding for pension plans or change the manner in
which contributions to any pension plans are made or the basis
on which contributions are determined; |
|
|
|
|
|
except as may be required as a result of a change under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP,
make any change in our accounting methods, principles or
practices materially affecting our reported consolidated assets,
liabilities or results of operations; |
|
|
|
sell, lease, license, or otherwise dispose of, or subject to any
lien, any material assets, including intellectual property
rights, except in the ordinary course of business and consistent
with past practice; |
|
|
|
repurchase, prepay, or incur any indebtedness for borrowed money
or guarantee any debt obligations of another person, issue or
sell any debt securities or warrants or other rights to acquire
any debt securities, enter into any agreement to maintain any
financial statement condition of another person, except for
short-term borrowings incurred in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, in an amount not to
exceed $25,000,000, or make any loans, advances, or capital
contributions to, or investments in, any other person, except to
us or in our subsidiaries in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000
in the aggregate; |
|
|
|
make or agree to make any new capital expenditure or
expenditures, other than an allowable contract expense under
government contracts, that, individually, are in excess of
$3,000,000 or, in the aggregate, are in excess of $20,000,000; |
|
|
|
pay, discharge, settle, or satisfy any claims, liabilities or
obligations (other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or as required by their terms),
liabilities reflected or reserved against in the most recent
consolidated financial statements or incurred since the date of
such financial statements or cancel any material indebtedness or
waive any claims or rights of substantial value; |
|
|
|
agree in writing to modify in any manner or consent to any
matter with respect to which consent is required under any
material confidentiality or standstill agreement; |
|
|
|
enter into a contract or make a bid for a contract that if
accepted would lead to a contract that if entered into would
result in a gross profit loss to us or any of our subsidiaries,
be a fixed price development contract, or be a contract that
restricts our ability to conduct our business in any geographic
territory, or amend, revise, or renew any such contract; |
37
|
|
|
|
|
enter into any contract under which the consummation of the
merger is reasonably likely to conflict with or result in a
violation or breach of, or default under, or give rise to a
right of, or result in, termination, cancellation, or
acceleration of any obligation or to a loss of a material
benefit under, or result in a lien upon any of the properties or
assets of us or our subsidiaries under, or give rise to any
increased, additional, accelerated or guaranteed right or
entitlements of any third party under, or result in any material
alteration of, any provision of such contract; |
|
|
|
revalue any assets that are material to us and our subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, except as required by GAAP; or |
|
|
|
make or change any material tax election or settle or compromise
any material tax liability without BAE Systems prior
written consent or enter into any transaction that would result
in a material recognition of income or gain other than
transactions expressly required by the merger agreement or
effected in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice. |
Efforts to Complete the Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the merger
agreement, we, BAE Systems and Acquisition Sub have agreed to
use reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all
actions and to do, or cause to be done, and to assist and
cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things reasonably
necessary to complete, in the most expeditious manner
practicable, the merger and any transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, including (i) obtaining all applicable
actions or nonactions, waivers, consents and approvals from
governmental entities and making all applicable registrations
and filings and taking all reasonable steps to obtain an
approval or waiver from, or to avoid an action or proceeding by,
any governmental entity, (ii) obtaining necessary consents,
approvals or waivers from third parties, and
(iii) executing any additional documents necessary to
complete the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Notwithstanding the above, neither BAE Systems nor any of its
affiliates, including Acquisition Sub, will be required to agree
to (i) any prohibition or limitation on the ownership or
operation of us, BAE Systems or any of our or its affiliates of
any material portion of the business or assets of us, BAE
Systems or any of our or its affiliates, (ii) any
requirements to dispose of or hold separate any material portion
of our or BAE Systems business or assets, (iii) any
limitations on the ability of BAE Systems to acquire or hold, or
exercise full rights of ownership of, any shares of capital
stock of the surviving corporation, or (iv) any prohibition
on the ability of BAE Systems or any of its affiliates to
effectively control in any material respect the business or
operations of the surviving corporation.
The parties have agreed that the surviving corporation will,
simultaneously with the completion of the merger, satisfy all
outstanding obligations under our credit agreement.
Conditions to the Merger
The consummation of the merger is subject to certain customary
closing conditions, as described further below.
|
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligations |
Each partys obligations to effect the merger are subject
to the satisfaction or waiver of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
The merger agreement shall have been adopted by our stockholders; |
|
|
|
The merger shall have been approved by the shareholders of BAE
Parent; |
|
|
|
Any waiting period (and any extensions thereof) applicable to
the merger under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, shall have
been terminated, any applicable approvals, clearances, or
consents, pursuant to foreign competition, antitrust or similar
laws shall have been obtained, no governmental entity shall have
taken any action to revoke the license under the Swedish Act on
War Equipment granted to Bofors and, any and all other
authorizations, consents, orders or approvals of, or
declarations or filings with, or expirations of waiting periods
imposed by, any |
38
|
|
|
|
|
governmental entity necessary for the consummation of the merger
or the related transactions shall have been obtained or filed or
shall have occurred (other than those not reasonably likely to
have a material adverse effect on the business, assets,
financial condition or results of operations of us and our
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or BAE Systems and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole); |
|
|
|
the period of time for any applicable review process by the
CFIUS under Exon-Florio shall have expired, and the President of
the United States shall not have taken action to prevent the
consummation of the merger or the related transactions; and |
|
|
|
no temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent
injunction or other order issued by any court of competent
jurisdiction or other legal restraint or law prohibiting the
consummation of the merger or the related transactions shall be
in effect. |
|
|
|
Conditions to BAE Systems and Acquisition Subs
Obligations. |
The obligations of BAE Systems and Acquisition Sub to effect the
merger are further subject to the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Our representations and warranties in the merger agreement,
without regard to any qualifiers relating to materiality or
material adverse effect, as defined below, shall be true and
correct as of the closing date of the merger as though made on
the closing date, except to the extent such representations and
warranties expressly relate to an earlier date (in which case
such representations and warranties shall be true and correct,
without regard to any qualifiers relating to materiality or
material adverse effect, as of such earlier date), except where
the failure of such representations and warranties to be true
and correct is not reasonably likely, individually or in the
aggregate, to have a material adverse effect; |
|
|
|
Our representations and warranties in the merger agreement
relating to: our capital structure; our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the SEC as compared to the draft provided to BAE
Systems; the absence of any threatened or existing governmental
audit, inquiry or investigation involving us or our
subsidiaries; compliance with all legal requirements under the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and under certain anti-bribery
laws; and portions of our representations and warranties
relating to our and our subsidiaries material government
contracts that are qualified as to materiality or material
adverse effect shall be true and correct and those not so
qualified shall be true and correct in all material respects, as
of the date of the merger agreement and as of the closing date
of the merger as though made on the closing date, except to the
extent such representations and warranties expressly relate to
an earlier date (in which case such representations and
warranties qualified as to materiality or material adverse
effect shall be true and correct, and those not so qualified
shall be true and correct in all material respects, on and as of
such earlier date); |
|
|
|
We shall have performed in all material respects all obligations
required to be performed by us under the merger agreement at, or
prior to, the closing date of the merger; |
|
|
|
BAE Systems shall have received a certificate signed on our
behalf by our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer to the effect of the preceding three bullets; |
|
|
|
There shall not be pending or threatened in writing any suit,
proceeding, or other action that has a reasonable likelihood of
success by any governmental entity located in the United States,
challenging the acquisition by BAE Systems or Acquisition Sub of
any of our issued and outstanding common stock, seeking to
prohibit, limit or impose restrictions on or requirements
relating to the ownership or operation by us, BAE Systems, or
any of our or its affiliates of any material portion of the
business or assets of us, BAE Systems or any of our or its
affiliates or to compel us, BAE Systems or any of our or its
affiliates to dispose of or hold separate any material portion
of the business or assets of us, BAE Systems or any of our or
its affiliates, as a result of the merger or any other related
transaction, seeking to impose limitations on the ability of BAE
Systems to acquire or hold, or exercise full rights of ownership
of, any shares of capital stock of the surviving corporation, or
seeking to prohibit BAE |
39
|
|
|
|
|
Systems or any of its affiliates from effectively controlling in
any material respect the business or operations of the surviving
corporation; and |
|
|
|
Since December 31, 2004, there shall not have been any
material adverse change relating to us. |
With regard to us, a material adverse effect is a
material adverse effect on (i) the business, assets,
financial condition or results of operations of us and our
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (ii) the ability of us
to consummate the merger and the related transactions.
A material adverse change is any event, change,
effect, or development that, individually or in the aggregate,
is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect, other
than events, changes, effects, or developments arising out of,
or caused by, (i) general economic conditions,
(ii) conditions generally affecting the industries in which
we operate, (iii) the financial markets in general,
(iv) the entering into or the public announcement or
disclosure of the merger agreement or the consummation or
proposed consummation of the merger or the pendency thereof,
including any events, changes, effects, or developments arising
from BAE Parents ownership or proposed ownership of us or
(v) appropriations arising from the U.S. fiscal year
2005 supplemental budget or the U.S. fiscal year 2006
budget. Any event, change, effect, or development that,
individually or in the aggregate, has resulted in the suspension
or debarment of, or actions by the U.S. government relating
to the suspension or debarment of, us or our subsidiaries (or
any portion of us or our subsidiaries) from participation in the
award of any U.S. government contract is deemed to
constitute a material adverse change.
|
|
|
Conditions to Our Obligations. |
Our obligation to effect the merger is further subject to the
following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
BAE Systems and Acquisition Subs representations and
warranties in the merger agreement, without regard to any
qualifiers relating to materiality or material adverse effect,
as defined below, shall be true and correct as of the closing
date of the merger as though made on the closing date, except to
the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate
to an earlier date (in which case such representations and
warranties shall be true and correct, without regard to any
qualifiers relating to materiality or material adverse effect,
as of such earlier date), except where the failure of such
representations and warranties to be true and correct is not
reasonably likely, individually or in the aggregate, to have a
material adverse effect; |
|
|
|
BAE Systems and Acquisition Sub shall have performed in all
material respects all obligations to be performed by them under
the merger agreement at or prior to the closing date of the
merger; and |
|
|
|
we shall have received a certificate signed on BAE Systems
behalf by its chief executive officer and chief financial
officer to the effect of the preceding two bullets. |
With regard to BAE Systems, a material adverse
effect is a material adverse effect on the ability of BAE
Systems or Acquisition Sub to consummate the merger and the
related transactions.
Annual Meeting; Proxy Statement
We have agreed to call and hold the annual meeting described in
this proxy statement and to recommend through our board of
directors that our stockholders adopt the merger agreement at
the annual meeting. We also agreed to include our board of
directors recommendation in this proxy statement and to
solicit proxies from our stockholders in favor of the approval
of the merger. We have agreed to provide BAE Systems a
reasonable opportunity to review and comment on the proxy
statement or respond to any comments from the SEC and reasonably
consider all comments and responses reasonably proposed by BAE
Systems. We will use our reasonable best efforts to cause the
proxy statement to be mailed to our stockholders as promptly as
practicable after filing with the SEC.
BAE Parent Letter
BAE Parent, concurrent with the execution and delivery of the
merger agreement, executed and delivered to us a letter
containing undertakings: (i) to call an extraordinary
general meeting of BAE Parents shareholders for the
purpose of obtaining shareholder approval of the merger,
(ii) to send a circular to BAE
40
Parents shareholders in connection with the BAE Parent
shareholder meeting, and certain matters relating thereto, and
(iii) to guarantee to us BAE Systems and Acquisition
Subs obligation to pay the aggregate merger consideration
in accordance with the merger agreement. In connection with the
first two undertakings, we have agreed to furnish all
information concerning us and our subsidiaries as may be
reasonably requested in connection with the preparation, filing
and distribution of the BAE Parent circular.
BAE Parent expects to hold its extraordinary general meeting of
shareholders relating to approval of the merger in May 2005
after the date of the annual meeting.
No Solicitation of Other Offers; Adverse Recommendation
Change; Termination to Accept a Superior Proposal
We have agreed that we will not, and will not authorize or
permit any of our subsidiaries to, nor will we permit or
authorize any officer, director, employee, advisor,
representative, or agent of us or any of our subsidiaries to,
directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage, or take any other
action to knowingly facilitate any inquiry or the making of any
proposal that constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a
takeover proposal, as defined below, or |
|
|
|
enter into, otherwise participate in any discussions or
negotiations with respect to or otherwise cooperate in any way
with any takeover proposal. |
We have agreed that we:
|
|
|
|
|
will, and will use our reasonable best efforts to cause each of
our subsidiaries and our representatives to, immediately cease
and cause to be terminated all existing discussions or
negotiations with any person conducted prior to the date of the
merger agreement with respect to any takeover proposal and
request from each person that has executed a confidentiality
agreement with us the prompt return or destruction of all
confidential information previously furnished to such person or
its representatives; and |
|
|
|
will promptly (but in no case later than 24 hours after
receipt thereof) advise BAE Systems orally and in writing of any
takeover proposal or inquiry or request for information with
respect to, or that could reasonably be expected to lead to, any
takeover proposal, the identity of the person making such
takeover proposal, inquiry or request and the material terms of
such takeover proposal, inquiry or request and will provide BAE
Systems promptly after receipt or delivery thereof (but in no
case later than 24 hours after receipt or delivery thereof)
with copies of such takeover proposal, inquiry or request. |
Prior to the adoption of the merger agreement by our
stockholders, we may furnish information to and participate in
discussions and negotiations with the person making any bona
fide written takeover proposal if:
|
|
|
|
|
our board of directors determines in good faith after
consultation with a financial advisor of nationally recognized
reputation that the takeover proposal constitutes or is
reasonably likely to lead to a superior proposal (as defined
below) and |
|
|
|
the takeover proposal did not result from a breach of the
prohibition of our solicitation of takeover proposals and we
have complied with our obligations under the non-solicitation
covenant (including providing BAE Systems prior written notice
of our decision to take such action). |
We have also agreed that prior to furnishing information to a
person making a takeover proposal, we will receive from that
person an executed confidentiality agreement that is not less
restrictive as a whole of such person than the confidentiality
agreement signed by BAE Systems in connection with the merger
(provided that such confidentiality agreement and any related
agreement shall not contain any provision having the effect of
prohibiting us from satisfying our obligations under the merger
agreement, provided, further, that all such information is
provided or made available on a substantially concurrent basis
to BAE Systems and Acquisition Sub).
41
We have agreed that neither our board of directors nor any
committee thereof will:
|
|
|
|
|
recommend the approval or adoption of any takeover proposal; |
|
|
|
determine that the merger agreement or the merger is no longer
advisable; |
|
|
|
withdraw or modify in a manner adverse to BAE Systems or
Acquisition Sub the approval of the merger agreement, the merger
or any of the related transactions; |
|
|
|
recommend that our stockholders reject the merger agreement, the
merger or any of the related transactions; |
|
|
|
resolve, agree or propose publicly to take any of the above
actions (any action described in this bullet or the preceding
four bullets being referred to as an adverse
recommendation change); |
|
|
|
adopt or approve any takeover proposal or withdraw its approval
of the merger agreement or resolve, agree, or propose publicly
to do any of the foregoing; or |
|
|
|
cause or permit us to enter into any letter of intent,
memorandum of understanding, agreement in principle, acquisition
agreement, merger agreement, option agreement, joint venture
agreement, partnership agreement, or similar agreement
constituting or related to, or which is intended to or is
reasonably likely to lead to, a takeover proposal, or resolve,
agree or propose to take any such actions; |
except that, at any time before our stockholders adopt the
merger agreement, our board of directors may make an adverse
recommendation change if the board of directors determines in
good faith, after consultation with outside counsel, that the
failure to do so would result in a breach of its fiduciary
duties to our stockholders under applicable law.
In addition, our board of directors may, before our stockholders
adopt the merger agreement, cause us to terminate the merger
agreement and immediately following such termination, to enter
into a binding agreement containing the terms of a superior
proposal; provided however, that, no such termination may be
made until three business days after the date of BAE
Systems receipt of a written notice from us advising BAE
Systems that the board of directors intends to terminate the
merger agreement and payment of the termination fee, as defined
below. The parties agreed in the merger agreement that any
material amendment to the financial or other terms of a superior
proposal will require a new notice from us advising BAE Systems
that our board of directors intends to terminate the merger
agreement; provided that no such termination of the merger
agreement may be made until two business days after BAE
Systems receipt of such new notice and payment of the
termination fee.
Takeover proposal means any proposal or offer
relating to, or that is reasonably likely to lead to:
|
|
|
|
|
any direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of assets or
businesses that constitute or represent 20% or more of the
revenues, net income or assets of us and our subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, or 20% or more of any class of our equity
securities; or |
|
|
|
any merger, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, joint venture,
binding share exchange or similar transaction involving us or
any of our subsidiaries, in each case, other than the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. |
Superior proposal means any bona fide written offer
by a third party that:
|
|
|
|
|
if consummated would result in such third party or its
stockholders acquiring, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of
the voting power of our common stock or all or substantially all
of the assets of us and our subsidiaries, taken as a whole, for
consideration that our board of directors determines, in good
faith and after consultation with a financial advisor of
nationally recognized reputation, to have a higher value than
the consideration to be received by our stockholders in
connection with the merger, taking into account, among other
things, any changes to the terms of the merger agreement
proposed by BAE Systems; and |
|
|
|
is reasonably capable of being completed, taking into account
all financial, legal, regulatory and other aspects of the offer,
including all conditions contained therein. |
42
Termination of the Merger Agreement
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
completion of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of us, BAE Systems and Acquisition Sub; |
|
|
|
by either BAE Systems or us: |
|
|
|
|
|
if the merger is not completed on or before December 6,
2005, except that a party who has willfully and materially
breached the merger agreement cannot terminate on this basis; |
|
|
|
if any governmental entity has issued an order, decree or ruling
or taken any other action permanently enjoining, restraining or
otherwise prohibiting the merger and such order, decree, ruling
or other action has become final and nonappealable; |
|
|
|
if our stockholders do not adopt the merger agreement; or |
|
|
|
if the shareholders of BAE Parent do not approve the merger. |
by BAE Systems:
|
|
|
|
|
if we have breached or failed to perform any of our
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements contained
in the merger agreement, if such breach or failure to perform
would cause failure of the condition to the merger relating to
our representations and warranties or our covenants and
agreements and such breach or failure to perform cannot be or
has not been cured within 30 days after the giving of
written notice to us of such breach; or |
|
|
|
in the event our board of directors makes an adverse
recommendation change within 10 days after the occurrence
of such adverse recommendation change. |
by us:
|
|
|
|
|
if BAE Systems or Acquisition Sub has breached or failed to
perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or
agreements contained in any document relating to the merger, if
such breach or failure to perform would cause failure of any
condition set forth under Conditions to the
Merger Conditions to Our Obligations and
such breach or failure to perform cannot be or has not been
cured within 30 days after giving written notice to BAE
Systems or Acquisition Sub; |
|
|
|
if before our stockholders have adopted the merger agreement, in
response to a superior proposal that did not result from a
breach of our non-solicitation obligations pursuant to the
applicable provisions of the merger agreement, we enter into the
terms of a binding agreement containing the terms of a superior
proposal as described in more detail under No
Solicitation of Other Offers; Adverse Recommendation Change;
Termination to Accept a Superior Proposal, and shall
have given notice as described above and paid the termination
fee described below; or |
|
|
|
if the board of directors of BAE Parent has failed to recommend
the approval of the merger by the shareholders of BAE Parent in
the circular sent to shareholders of BAE Parent or the board of
directors of BAE Parent has changed in a manner adverse to us or
withdrawn its recommendation of the merger to the shareholders
of BAE Parent or recommended that the shareholders of BAE Parent
reject the merger, in each case, within 10 days after the
occurrence of the event giving us the right to terminate. |
Termination Fee
We must pay to BAE Systems a termination fee of $119,233,768 if:
|
|
|
|
|
(a) a takeover proposal is made to us, or directly to our
stockholders, or a takeover proposal has become otherwise
publicly known, (b) thereafter either BAE Systems or we
terminate the merger agreement either because (i) the
closing of the merger does not occur on or before
December 6, 2005 or (ii) our stockholders do not adopt
the merger agreement and (c)(i) any time on or prior to the
six-month anniversary of termination of the merger agreement, we
or any of our subsidiaries enter into an acquisition agreement
with respect to any takeover proposal or any transaction
contemplated by a takeover proposal is consummated or
(ii) on or after the six-month and prior to the one-year
anniversary of the termination of the merger agreement, we or
any of our subsidiaries enter into an |
43
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition agreement with respect to any takeover proposal by a
designated party, as defined below, or any transaction
contemplated by a takeover proposal is consummated by a
designated party; |
|
|
|
we terminate the merger agreement to enter into an agreement
with respect to a superior proposal; or |
|
|
|
BAE Systems terminates the agreement because our board of
directors makes an adverse recommendation change and either
prior to such termination a takeover proposal shall have been
made or otherwise become publicly known or at any time prior to
the one-year anniversary of such termination, we or any of our
subsidiaries enters into an acquisition agreement with respect
to a takeover proposal or any transaction contemplated by a
takeover proposal is consummated. |
A designated party is any person with whom we or any
of our affiliates have engaged, within four months prior to the
date of the merger agreement, in any discussion regarding any
possible takeover proposal or any person who makes or
consummates a takeover proposal prior to termination of the
merger agreement. Solely for purposes of the termination fee
provision in the merger agreement, the number 40 is
substituted for the number 20 in the definition of
takeover proposal.
Indemnification Obligations
BAE Systems will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, honor
or cause the surviving corporation to honor all our obligations
to indemnify (including any obligations to advance funds for
expenses) our current or former directors or officers for acts
or omissions by such directors and officers occurring prior to
the completion of the merger to the extent that such obligations
exist on the date of the merger agreement, and these obligations
will survive the merger and continue in full force and effect
until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations
with respect to any claims against such directors and officers
arising out of such acts or omissions. The surviving corporation
will maintain current directors and officers liability insurance
(or equivalent) for six years after completion of the merger
(provided that it will not be obligated to pay more than 300% of
the current annual premium).
Employee Obligations
The merger agreement provides that, through December 31,
2006, our employees and employees of our subsidiaries who remain
employed by the surviving corporation and its subsidiaries will
receive wages, cash bonus opportunities, and other employee
benefits (excluding equity-based compensation and long-term
incentive awards) that in the aggregate are substantially
comparable to those provided by us prior to the effective date
of the merger agreement. With respect to long-term incentive
awards, the continuing employees will be treated in
substantially the same manner as other similarly situated peer
employees of BAE Systems.
Following the completion of the merger, BAE Systems will cause
the surviving corporation to recognize service with us and any
of our subsidiaries prior to completion of the merger as if such
service had been performed with BAE Systems for purposes of
eligibility and vesting (but not benefit accrual under any
defined benefit pension plan) under BAE Systems employee
pension benefit plans, for purposes of eligibility for vacation,
for purposes of eligibility and participation under any health
or welfare plan maintained by BAE Systems (other than
post-employment health or welfare plans), and unless covered
under another arrangement with us, for eligibility and benefit
calculation purposes under BAE Systems severance plans
but, in each case, solely to the extent that BAE Systems elects
to make such plan or program available to employees of the
surviving corporation.
BAE Systems and its subsidiaries, including the surviving
corporation, will use commercially reasonable efforts to waive
all limitations as to preexisting conditions and exclusions with
respect to participation and coverage requirements under any
welfare plans maintained by BAE Systems in which continuing
employees are eligible to participate after completion of the
merger to the extent such conditions, exclusions, and
requirements were satisfied or did not apply prior to completion
of the merger and will provide continuing employees with credit
for co-payments and annual deductibles paid in satisfying any
analogous deductible or out-of-pocket requirements under our
plans.
44
Amendment, Extension and Waiver
The parties may amend or waive provisions of the merger
agreement at any time before completion of the merger. All such
amendments and waivers must be in writing and signed, in the
case of an amendment, by us, BAE Systems and Acquisition Sub or,
in the case of a waiver, by each party against whom the waiver
is to be effective. However, no amendment or waiver may be made
that by law requires further approval by stockholders unless we
obtain such further approval. No failure or delay by any party
in exercising any right, power or privilege under the merger
agreement shall act as a waiver and no single or partial
exercise of any right, power, or privilege shall act as a waiver.
45
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nine directors are to be elected at the annual meeting. Nominees
for election to the board of directors shall be approved by a
plurality of the votes cast by holders of our common stock
present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting, each share
of common stock being entitled to one vote.
Abstentions from voting on the election of directors, including
broker non-votes, will have no effect on the outcome of the
election of directors. In the event any nominee is unable or
unwilling to serve as a nominee, the proxies may be voted for
the balance of those nominees named and for any substitute
nominee designated by the present board of directors or the
proxy holders to fill such vacancy, or for the balance of those
nominees named without nomination of a substitute, or the board
of directors may be reduced in accordance with our bylaws. The
board of directors has no reason to believe that any of the
persons named will be unable or unwilling to serve as a nominee
or as a director if elected.
Set forth below is certain information concerning the nine
directors to be elected at the annual meeting:
Thomas W. Rabaut, age 56, became our President and
Chief Executive Officer in January 1994 and has been a director
since October 1997. Mr. Rabaut joined FMC Corporation in
June 1977 and has worked in a variety of executive positions
including General Manager of FMCs Steel Products Division
from 1986 to 1988 and Operations Director and then Vice
President and General Manager of FMCs Ground Systems
Division from 1988 to 1993. Mr. Rabaut also served as
General Manager of FMCs Defense Systems Group, overseeing
operations in the United States, Sweden, Turkey, Pakistan, and
Saudi Arabia for products and services that FMC provided to U.S.
and allied armies, navies and marines from 1993 to 1994, at
which time he was elected Vice President of FMC. Before joining
FMC, Mr. Rabaut graduated from the U.S. Military
Academy at West Point in 1970 and served in the U.S. Army
until 1975 as an officer in several company- and battalion-level
positions. He also recently served as Chairman of the board of
directors of the National Defense Industrial Association and
continues to serve with several non-profit organizations
involved in public affairs.
Francis Raborn, age 61, became our Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer in January 1994 and has been a
director since December 1997. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Raborn served as FMCs Defense Systems Group
Controller in Santa Clara, California, where he was
responsible for leading the financial planning for FMCs
four defense divisions. His previous assignment at FMC was
Special Products Group Controller in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
where he presided over the finance function of a commercial
business group composed of eight smaller machinery and specialty
chemical divisions. His first assignment with FMC was the
Director of Operations Analysis and Special Studies on the
Corporate Finance staff in Chicago, Illinois. Before joining
FMC, Mr. Raborn worked in a financial capacity with
Chemetron Corporation and Ford Motor Company. He also served in
the U.S. Air Force as an F-4 Phantom pilot and command
center duty director.
William E. Conway, Jr., age 55, has been our
Chairman of the board of directors since October 1997. He has
been a Managing Director of The Carlyle Group, a
Washington, D.C.-based global investment firm, since August
1987. Mr. Conway was Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of MCI Communications Corporation from 1984
until 1987 and was a Vice President and Treasurer of MCI from
1981 to 1984. He is also Chairman of Nextel Communications, Inc.
Mr. Conway had previously been elected as a director
pursuant to an agreement among us, Iron Horse Investors, L.L.C.
and other affiliates of The Carlyle Group whereby we had agreed
to designate nominees to our board of directors on behalf of
certain affiliates of The Carlyle Group. That agreement
terminated in February 2004.
Frank C. Carlucci, age 74, became a director in
December 1997. He is currently Chairman Emeritus of The Carlyle
Group, where he previously served as Chairman from 1989 to early
2003. Prior to joining The Carlyle Group in 1989,
Mr. Carlucci served as Secretary of Defense from November
1987 to January 1989 and as President Reagans National
Security Advisor in 1987. Mr. Carlucci currently serves as
Chairman of the board of directors for Neurogen Corporation. He
is also a director on the boards of SunResorts, Ltd., NV and
Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. (formerly Texas Biotechnology
Corporation). Mr. Carlucci had previously been elected as a
director pursuant to an agreement among us, Iron Horse
Investors, L.L.C. and other affiliates of The Carlyle Group
whereby we had agreed to designate nominees to our board of
directors on behalf of certain affiliates of The Carlyle Group.
That agreement terminated in February 2004.
46
Peter J. Clare, age 39, became a director in October
1997. Since March 1999, Mr. Clare has been a Managing
Director with The Carlyle Group, which he joined in August 1992.
From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Clare served as a Vice President of
The Carlyle Group and from 1997 to 1999 he was a Principal with
The Carlyle Group. Mr. Clare was previously with First City
Capital, a private investment group, and also worked at
Prudential-Bache. Mr. Clare serves as a director on the
boards of Aviall, Inc. and KorAm Bank, as well as several
privately held companies, and has been the Vice President and
Managing Director of our principal stockholder Iron Horse
Investors, L.L.C. since October 1997. Mr. Clare had
previously been elected as a director pursuant to an agreement
among us, Iron Horse Investors, L.L.C. and other affiliates of
The Carlyle Group whereby we had agreed to designate nominees to
our board of directors on behalf of certain affiliates of The
Carlyle Group. That agreement terminated in February 2004.
C. Thomas Faulders, III, age 55, became a
director in May 2003. Since June 1999, Mr. Faulders has
been President and Chief Executive Officer of LCC International,
Inc., a supplier of infrastructure services to the wireless
telecommunications industry. Mr. Faulders served as
Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
of BDM International, Inc., a global information technology
company, from March 1995 until its sale to TRW in December 1998.
Prior to joining BDM International, Mr. Faulders served
with Comsat Corporation, a provider of international
communications, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
from March 1992. Prior to that, Mr. Faulders served in
various executive positions with MCI Communications Corp.
Mr. Faulders is a director of LCC International and ePlus,
Inc., a provider of enterprise cost management software.
J. H. Binford Peay, III, age 64, became a
director in December 1997. General Peay was a career
U.S. Army officer who attained the rank of General and
retired from the Army on October 1, 1997. He served as the
Commander-In-Chief of the U.S. Central Command from 1994 to
1997, and also served as Vice Chief of Staff of the
U.S. Army from 1993 to 1994. General Peay is currently the
Chairman of Allied Defense Group, where he also served as Chief
Executive Officer. He also serves as Chairman of the Board of
Trustees of the National Defense University and is currently
President of the Fort Campbell Historical Foundation, Inc.
General Peay has been the Superintendent of the Virginia
Military Institute since July 1, 2003.
John M. Shalikashvili, age 68, became a director in
June 1998. General Shalikashvili is an independent consultant
and a Visiting Professor at Stanford University. Prior to his
appointment, he was the senior officer of the United States
military and principal military advisor to the President of the
United States, the Secretary of Defense and the National
Security Council in his capacity as the thirteenth Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Defense, for two terms
from 1993 to 1997. Prior to his tenure as Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, he served as the Commander-in-Chief of all
U.S. forces in Europe and as NATOs tenth Supreme
Allied Commander, Europe (SACEUR). He also served in a variety
of command and staff positions in the continental United States,
Alaska, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam.
General Shalikashvili is a director of The Boeing Company, Frank
Russell Trust Company, L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc., and
Plug Power, Inc.
Robert J. Natter, age 59, became a director in 2004.
Admiral Natter is a career U.S. Navy officer who retired
from the Navy on October 3, 2003. Prior to his retirement,
Admiral Natter served as the Commander of the U.S. Atlantic
Fleet from 2000 to 2003. From 2001 to 2003, he also served as
the first Commander of the newly established U.S. Fleet
Forces Command. Admiral Natter is a distinguished graduate of
the U.S. Naval War College and has Masters Degrees in
Business Management and International Relations. Admiral Natter
is currently a private consultant.
Unless marked otherwise, proxies received will be voted FOR the
election of each of the nominees named above.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR the election
of all director nominees named above.
The Board of Directors and Committees
Our board of directors met six times during 2004 and acted by
unanimous written consent two times. Each director, during his
term as director, attended at least 75% of the aggregate number
of meetings of our
47
board of directors except for Mr. Shalikashvili, who was
prevented by health circumstances from participating in board
activities during the last several months of 2004. Each
director, during his term as director, attended at least 75% of
the aggregate number of meetings of the committees of our board
of directors of which he was a member except for
Mr. Shalikashvili, who was prevented by health
circumstances from participating in board activities during the
last several months of 2004. During 2004 the board of directors
had a standing audit and ethics committee, a compensation
committee, and a nominating and corporate governance committee.
|
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
We established our nominating and corporate governance committee
in March 2004. The members of this committee are
Messrs. Conway, Carlucci and Natter, who are all
independent members of our board of directors for purposes of
the NYSE listing standards. Mr. Conway serves as the
chairman of this committee. Our board of directors has adopted a
charter governing the activities of the nominating and corporate
governance committee, which may be viewed online on our Web site
at www.uniteddefense.com. Pursuant to its charter, the
nominating and corporate governance committees tasks
include identifying individuals qualified to become members of
our board of directors, recommending to our board of directors
director nominees to fill vacancies in the membership of our
board of directors as they occur and, prior to each annual
meeting of stockholders, recommending director nominees for
election at such meeting, making recommendations to our board of
directors concerning the size and composition of our board of
directors, conducting succession planning regarding our Chief
Executive Officer and other senior officer positions, and
leading our board of directors in its annual review of its
performance. The committee is also empowered to develop and
recommend to our board of directors corporate governance
principles applicable to us. Candidates for our board of
directors are considered based upon various criteria, such as
skills, knowledge, perspective, broad business judgment and
leadership, relevant specific industry or regulatory affairs
knowledge, business creativity and vision, experience, and any
other factors appropriate in the context of an assessment of the
committees understood needs of the board of directors at
that time. In addition, the committee considers whether the
individual satisfies criteria for independence as may be
required by applicable regulations and personal integrity and
judgment. Accordingly, we seek to attract and retain highly
qualified directors who have sufficient time to attend to their
substantial duties and responsibilities to us.
The nominating and corporate governance committee has the sole
authority to retain, compensate, and terminate any search firm
or firms to be used in connection with the identification,
assessment, and/or engagement of directors and director
candidates. We have not retained any such firm in the past.
The nominating and corporate governance committee considers
proposed nominees whose names are submitted to it by
stockholders; however, it does not have a formal process for
that consideration. We have not to date adopted a formal process
because we believe that the informal consideration process has
been adequate to date. The committee intends to review
periodically whether a more formal policy should be adopted. If
a stockholder wishes to suggest a proposed name for committee
consideration, the name of that nominee and related personal
information should be forwarded to the nominating and corporate
governance committee, in care of the corporate Secretary, at
least six months before the next annual meeting to assure time
for meaningful consideration by the committee. See also
Stockholder Proposals for bylaw requirements
for nominations.
The nominating and corporate governance committee met one time
in 2004 and did not act by unanimous written consent.
All of the nominees for directors being voted upon at the annual
meeting are directors standing for re-election.
|
|
|
Stockholder Communication with Board of Directors
Members |
Although we have not to date developed formal processes by which
stockholders may communicate directly to directors, we believe
that the informal process, in which stockholder communications
that are received by the Secretary for our board of
directors attention, or summaries thereof, will be
forwarded to our board of directors, has served our board of
directors and the stockholders needs. In view of SEC
disclosure requirements relating to this issue, the nominating
and corporate governance committee may consider
48
development of more specific procedures. Until any other
procedures are developed and posted on our corporate website,
any communications to our board of directors should be sent to
it in care of the Secretary.
|
|
|
Board of Directors Attendance at Annual Meetings |
We encourage all of our directors to attend the annual meeting
of stockholders. We generally hold a board of directors meeting
coincident with the annual meeting to minimize director travel
obligations and facilitate their attendance at the
stockholders meeting; however, in light of the pending
merger, we do not expect to hold a board meeting in connection
with this annual meeting. All directors attended the 2004 annual
meeting of stockholders.
NYSE corporate governance rules require that a majority of our
board of directors be independent. No director qualifies as
independent unless our board of directors determines that the
director has no direct or indirect material relationship with
us. In assessing the independence of its members, our board of
directors examined the commercial, industrial, banking,
consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, and familial
relationships of each member. Our board of directors
inquiry extended to both direct and indirect relationships with
us. Based upon both detailed written submissions by its members
and discussions regarding the facts and circumstances pertaining
to each member, considered in the context of applicable NYSE
corporate governance rules, our board of directors has
determined that all of the directors are independent other than
Messrs. Rabaut and Raborn.
|
|
|
Audit and Ethics Committee |
The audit and ethics committee, established in accordance with
Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or the Exchange Act, consists of Messrs. Peay,
Shalikashvili, Clare, and Faulders, each of whom is independent
as the term independence is defined in
Section 303A.02 of the corporate governance rules of the
NYSE and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Mr. Clare
joined the committee in April 2004. Our board of directors has
determined that Mr. Faulders is an audit committee
financial expert, as that term is defined in the Exchange Act.
The responsibilities of this committee include:
|
|
|
|
|
the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of our
independent public accountants; |
|
|
|
reviewing with the independent public accountants the plans and
results of the audit engagement; |
|
|
|
approving professional services provided by the independent
public accountants; |
|
|
|
reviewing our critical accounting policies, our Annual and
Quarterly reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, and our earnings
releases; |
|
|
|
reviewing the independence of the independent public
accountants; and |
|
|
|
reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls and
overseeing our ethics program. |
The audit and ethics committee met 16 times during 2004 and did
not act by unanimous written consent. The charter of the audit
and ethics committee, as amended by the board of directors in
2004, is attached hereto as Annex E.
|
|
|
Audit and Ethics Committee Report |
To the Board of Directors:
We have reviewed and discussed with management UDIs
audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2004.
We have discussed with the independent auditors,
Ernst & Young LLP, the matters required to be discussed
with us by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the New
York Stock Exchange, and the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board, including those required by the Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 61.
49
We have received and reviewed the letter from Ernst &
Young LLP required by the Independence Standards Board, and have
discussed with Ernst & Young their independence,
including the written disclosures and letter required by
Independence Standard No. 1 of the Independence Standards
Board.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we
recommended to the board of directors that the audited
consolidated financial statements referred to above be included
in UDIs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 for filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
Audit and Ethics Committee: |
|
|
C. Thomas Faulders, III |
|
John M. Shalikashvili |
|
J. H. Binford Peay, III |
|
Peter J. Clare |
The compensation committee consists of Messrs. Conway,
Natter, and Peay, each of whom is independent as the term
independence is defined in Section 303A.02 of
the corporate governance rules of the NYSE. Mr. Clare
rotated off the committee in September 2004 at the same time
that Messrs. Conway and Natter joined the committee. This
committee is responsible for determining compensation for our
executive officers and other employees and administering the
United Defense Incentive Award Plan, our Management Incentive
Plan and other compensation programs. The compensation committee
met two times during 2004 and acted by unanimous written consent
in lieu of a meeting on two occasions.
During their 2003-2004 service year, all non-management
directors were paid annual cash retainers of $50,000 for service
on our board of directors as well as any standing committees of
our board of directors, other than the audit and ethics
committee, on which they served. Members of the audit and ethics
committee were paid an additional annual retainer of $10,000.
Beginning with the 2004-2005 service year, all non-management
directors are paid annual cash retainers of $40,000 and granted
1,000 shares of our common stock at the end of the service
year for service on our board of directors as well as any
standing committees of our board of directors, other than the
audit and ethics committee, on which they served. Members of the
audit and ethics committee are paid an additional annual
retainer of $10,000. We do not maintain a medical, dental, or
retirement benefits plan for non-management directors. There are
no other annual fees paid to non-management directors. The
remaining directors are employed by us and are not separately
compensated for their service as directors. Prior to
March 2, 2004, our non-management directors affiliated with
The Carlyle Group did not receive any compensation for serving
on our board of directors.
Executive Officers
Set forth below is certain information concerning our executive
officers. Biographical information on Messrs. Rabaut and
Raborn is included above under Election of
Directors. All executive officers hold office until a
successor is chosen and qualified.
Elmer L. Doty, age 50, became our Vice President in
February 2002 and the General Manager of our Ground Systems
operations in April 2001 after having served as General Manager
of the Steel Products Division since April 1994. Mr. Doty
began his career with FMC in August 1979 as Engineering Group
Leader and subsequently held the positions of Engineering
Manager, Director of Manufacturing/ Engineering, and Division
Manager of the Energy and Transportation Groups Conveyor
Equipment Division. Prior to joining FMC, Mr. Doty was
employed by Black & Veatch Consulting Engineers and by
General Electric Company.
John W. Hendrix, age 62, became our Vice President
of Business Development and Marketing in February 2003 following
a year as our Vice President for Corporate Development. Prior to
joining us, he served in the United States Army for over
36 years attaining the rank of General. He retired from the
United
50
States Army in January 2002 after completing his final
assignment as Commander, U.S. Army Forces Command. His
prior tours of duty included Commander, V Corps, Commander,
3rd Infantry Division and Commander, United States Army
Infantry Center. As an infantry officer, he served in command
and operations assignments at each echelon from platoon through
brigade. His 14 years of overseas duty included several
NATO assignments as well as service in Germany, Belgium,
Vietnam, and Saudi Arabia.
Keith B. Howe, age 47, became our Vice President and
General Manager of our Armament Systems operations in January
2002 after having served as the units Deputy General
Manager from October 1998 to December 2001 and its Controller
from September 1996 to October 1998. Prior to this,
Mr. Howe was Deputy Director of Navy Programs of our
Armament Systems operations from September 1995 to September
1996, was the Chief Financial Officer at FNSS, Ankara, Turkey
from May 1993 to September 1995, was the Controller of our
Armament Systems operations from April 1991 to May 1993, and was
the Bradley Fighting Vehicle Business Manager in San Jose,
California from November 1989 to April 1991.
David V. Kolovat, age 60, became our Vice President,
General Counsel, and Secretary in January 1994. Previously, he
served as the FMC Corporations Associate General Counsel
in charge of legal matters for its defense business from 1988
through 1993. Prior to that time, Mr. Kolovat served
successively as staff counsel for Deere & Company; in a
series a legal positions with Itel Corporation culminating as
that companys Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary; Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of
Robot Defense Systems, Inc.; and Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary of Premisys, Inc.
Alexander J. Krekich, age 62, has been President of
our subsidiary, United Stated Marine Repair, Inc., or USMR,
since its acquisition in July 2002. Prior to the acquisition, he
served as Chief Executive Officer of USMR from February 2002 and
as a director since March 1999. He originally joined Southwest
Marine, a subsidiary of USMR, in August 1998 as Special
Assistant to the President. Upon the acquisition of Norfolk
Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation, or Norshipco, in
October 1998, he became President and General Manager of the
Norfolk, Virginia based company. In February 1999, he was
appointed Chief Operating Officer of USMR while continuing as
President of Norshipco. Prior to joining private industry, he
served in the U.S. Navy for 34 years. His last
assignment before retiring as a Vice Admiral was as Commander of
all Surface Forces in the U.S. Pacific Fleet. He held
several ship commands during his naval career and is a combat
veteran of Vietnam, where he served in fast patrol boats.
Dennis A. Wagner III, age 54, has been the Vice
President and General Manager of our International operations
since January 2003. Prior to this assignment, Mr. Wagner
was our Vice President of Business Development and Marketing
from May 1994. Mr. Wagner was formerly the Division General
Manager of FMCs Steel Products Division and served as the
Program Director for the M113 Family of Vehicles at FMCs
Ground Systems Division. Mr. Wagner also served as the Army
Programs Marketing Manager and the Advanced Technology Program
Director at FMCs Defense Systems Group office in the
Washington, D.C. area. Before joining FMC in July 1981,
Mr. Wagner served in the U.S. Army as an Infantry
Officer. After his active U.S. Army service,
Mr. Wagner worked as a design engineer at the Ford Motor
Company and later as a mechanical engineer and project manager
at the U.S. Army Tank and Automotive Command.
51
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash
compensation paid or incurred on our behalf to our Chief
Executive Officer and each of the four other most highly
compensated executive officers, or the named executive officers,
whose annual compensation equaled or exceeded $100,000 as of
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Restricted | |
|
Securities | |
|
All Other | |
|
|
| |
|
Stock Awards | |
|
Underlying | |
|
Compensation | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary ($) | |
|
Bonus ($) | |
|
($)(1) | |
|
Options (#) | |
|
($)(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Thomas W. Rabaut
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
540,750 |
|
|
|
713,790 |
|
|
|
477,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
58,651 |
|
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
515,000 |
|
|
|
615,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
46,009 |
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
598,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francis Raborn
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
296,208 |
|
|
|
281,842 |
|
|
|
238,500 |
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
30,689 |
|
|
Vice President and Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
282,103 |
|
|
|
287,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,000 |
|
|
|
24,474 |
|
|
Financial Officer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
271,249 |
|
|
|
275,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander J. Krekich
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
256,850 |
|
|
|
127,200 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
42,031 |
(4) |
|
President United States
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
246,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
50,641 |
|
|
Marine Repair(3) |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
137,500 |
|
|
|
356,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
E Elmer L. Doty
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
252,252 |
|
|
|
248,342 |
|
|
|
152,640 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
|
Vice President and General
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
238,700 |
|
|
|
227,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
21,120 |
|
|
Manager Ground
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
228,927 |
|
|
|
237,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,206 |
|
|
Systems Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keith B. Howe
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
240,316 |
|
|
|
211,479 |
|
|
|
152,640 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
22,705 |
|
|
Vice President and General
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
228,873 |
|
|
|
230,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
21,799 |
|
|
Manager Armament
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
213,900 |
|
|
|
216,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,220 |
|
|
Systems Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
As of December 31, 2004, each of Messrs. Rabaut,
Raborn, Krekich, Doty, and Howe held 15,000, 7,500, 4,000,
4,800, and 4,800 shares of restricted stock, respectively,
and the values of such holdings were $708,750, $354,375,
$189,000, $226,800, and $226,800, respectively. Dividends will
be paid on the shares of restricted stock on the same basis and
to the extent any dividends are paid with respect to the shares
of our common stock. |
|
(2) |
Comprised of matching contributions under our qualified and
nonqualified thrift plans for salaried employees for 2004, 2003,
and 2002, value of personal use of an automobile provided by us
(automobile allowance in the case of Mr. Krekich) and for
the portion of term-life and accidental death and dismemberment
insurance premiums paid by us in 2004. |
|
(3) |
Mr. Krekich became one of our executive officers upon our
acquisition of United States Marine Repair in July 2002. |
|
(4) |
Also includes contributions to both the United States Marine
Repair Deferred Compensation and Profit Sharing Plans and club
dues. |
|
(5) |
Comprised of contributions to both the United States Marine
Repair Deferred Compensation and Profit Sharing Plans made by us
after our acquisition of United States Marine Repair and
automobile allowances. |
52
|
|
|
Option Grants in Fiscal 2004 |
The following table shows information regarding individual
option grants to our named executive officers during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004. Options were granted at an
exercise price equal to $31.80 per share. The term of each
option granted is generally ten years from the date of grant.
Options may terminate before expiration dates if the option
holders employment is terminated prior to the option
vesting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
Potential Realizable Value at | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Assumed Rates of Stock Price | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Employees | |
|
or Base | |
|
|
|
Appreciation for Option Term | |
|
|
Options | |
|
in Fiscal | |
|
Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted | |
|
Year | |
|
($/Sh) | |
|
Date | |
|
5% ($) | |
|
10% ($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Thomas W. Rabaut
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
15.00 |
|
|
|
31.80 |
|
|
|
1/20/2014 |
|
|
|
1,499,913.68 |
|
|
|
3,801,075.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Francis Raborn
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
31.80 |
|
|
|
1/20/2014 |
|
|
|
749,956.84 |
|
|
|
1,900,537.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander J. Krekich
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
31.80 |
|
|
|
1/20/2014 |
|
|
|
399,976.98 |
|
|
|
1,013,620.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Elmer L. Doty
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
|
|
31.80 |
|
|
|
1/20/2014 |
|
|
|
479,972.38 |
|
|
|
1,216,344.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Keith B. Howe
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
|
|
31.80 |
|
|
|
1/20/2014 |
|
|
|
479,972.38 |
|
|
|
1,216,344.25 |
|
|
|
|
Aggregated Option Exercises in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal
Year-End Option Values |
The following table shows information regarding option exercises
by our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 and the value and number of options to
purchase our common stock unexercised and outstanding as of
December 31, 2004. Also included is the value and number of
exercisable and unexercisable options held as of
December 31, 2004 by such named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise means an employees acquisition of
shares of common stock, exercisable means options to
purchase shares of common stock that have already vested and
that are subject to exercise, and unexercisable
means all other options to purchase shares of common stock that
have not vested. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options at | |
|
In-the-Money Options at | |
|
|
Shares Acquired | |
|
|
|
Fiscal Year-End (#) | |
|
Fiscal Year-End ($) | |
|
|
on Exercise | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
(#) | |
|
Realized ($) | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Thomas W. Rabaut
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,227,600 |
|
|
|
452,270 |
|
|
|
99,980 |
|
|
$ |
13,999,805 |
|
|
$ |
1,977,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Francis Raborn
|
|
|
13,750 |
|
|
$ |
368,278 |
|
|
|
140,010 |
|
|
|
50,490 |
|
|
$ |
3,266,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander J. Krekich
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
91,673 |
|
|
|
30,327 |
|
|
$ |
2,151,650 |
|
|
$ |
615,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
Elmer L. Doty
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
$ |
582,585 |
|
|
|
144,006 |
|
|
|
56,619 |
|
|
$ |
4,355,555 |
|
|
$ |
1,668,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
Keith B. Howe
|
|
|
42,503 |
|
|
$ |
502,265 |
|
|
|
50,503 |
|
|
|
32,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,147,922 |
|
|
$ |
656,755 |
|
53
|
|
|
Retirement and Pension Plans |
Each named executive officer, except for Mr. Krekich,
participates in the UDLP Employees Pension Plan and the UDLP
Excess Pension Plan for United Defense Limited Partnership and
Affiliates described below. The following table shows the
estimated annual pension benefits under those plans for the
specified compensation and years of service. A portion of the
retirement benefits for service prior to 1986, computed under
the UDLP Employees Pension Plan, is payable from annuity
contracts maintained by Aetna Life Insurance Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years of Credited Service | |
Final Average | |
|
| |
Earnings | |
|
15 | |
|
20 | |
|
25 | |
|
30 | |
|
35 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,276 |
|
|
$ |
40,367 |
|
|
$ |
50,459 |
|
|
$ |
60,551 |
|
|
$ |
70,643 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
52,776 |
|
|
|
70,367 |
|
|
|
87,959 |
|
|
|
105,551 |
|
|
|
123,143 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
75,276 |
|
|
|
100,367 |
|
|
|
125,459 |
|
|
|
150,551 |
|
|
|
175,643 |
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
120,276 |
|
|
|
160,367 |
|
|
|
200,459 |
|
|
|
240,551 |
|
|
|
280,643 |
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
142,776 |
|
|
|
190,367 |
|
|
|
237,959 |
|
|
|
285,551 |
|
|
|
333,143 |
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
199,026 |
|
|
|
265,367 |
|
|
|
331,709 |
|
|
|
398,051 |
|
|
|
464,393 |
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
244,026 |
|
|
|
325,367 |
|
|
|
406,709 |
|
|
|
488,051 |
|
|
|
569,393 |
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
289,026 |
|
|
|
385,367 |
|
|
|
481,709 |
|
|
|
578,051 |
|
|
|
674,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation included in the final average earnings for the
pension benefit computation includes base annual salary and
annual bonuses, but excludes payments for most other
compensation. |
|
|
|
Unreduced retirement pension benefits are calculated pursuant to
the UDLP Employees Pension Plans benefit formula as an
individual life annuity payable at age 65. Benefits may
also be payable as a joint and survivor annuity or a level
income option. |
|
|
|
Final average earnings in the above table means the average of
covered remuneration for the highest 60 consecutive calendar
months out of the 120 calendar months immediately preceding
retirement. |
|
|
|
Benefits applicable to a number of years of service or final
average earnings different from those in the above table are
equal to the sum of: |
|
|
|
1% of allowable Social Security Covered Compensation ($46,326)
for a participant retiring at age 65 in 2004 times years of
credited service; and 1.5% of the difference between final
average earnings and allowable Social Security Covered
Compensation times years of credited service. |
|
|
|
The Employment Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA, limits
the annual benefits that may be paid from a tax-qualified
retirement plan. Accordingly, as permitted by ERISA, we have
adopted the UDLP Excess Pension Plan for United Defense Limited
Partnership and Affiliates to maintain total benefits upon
retirement at the levels shown in the table. |
|
|
|
Credited Years of Service under Pension Plan for Named
Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Rabaut
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Francis Raborn
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Elmer L. Doty
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Keith B. Howe
|
|
|
25 |
|
We also maintain a nonqualified thrift plan designed to provide
select employees a benefit equal to the benefit the participant
would have received under the UDLP Employees Pension Plan, but
for the limitations on benefits contained in ERISA and the Code,
including the exclusion of compensation above a certain level.
All named executive officers are eligible to participate in the
nonqualified thrift plan.
|
|
|
United Defense Incentive Award Plan |
The United Defense Incentive Award Plan (formerly known as the
United Defense Stock Option Plan) was amended and restated and
approved by our stockholders at the 2004 annual meeting. The
Incentive Award Plan allows for the grant of various forms of
equity based compensation to our employees, directors, and
consultants including options, restricted stock, stock
appreciation rights, dividend equivalents, perform-
54
ance awards, deferred stock, restricted stock units, and stock
payments. However, only options to purchase our common stock and
restricted stock grants were made to our executive officers in
2004. Options granted in 2004 vest and become exercisable over
three years and the restrictions on restricted stock granted in
2004 lapse and the restricted stock becomes vested on the third
anniversary of the grant. The form and amount of awards to our
executive officers under the Incentive Award Plan are determined
by the compensation committee of our board of directors and/or
our full board of directors, as appropriate.
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information |
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2004,
the number of securities outstanding under our equity
compensation plans, the weighted average exercise price of such
securities and the number of securities available for grant
under these plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
to be Issued Upon | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Remaining Available | |
|
|
Exercise of | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
for Future Issuance | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Under Equity | |
|
|
Options, | |
|
Options, | |
|
Compensation Plans | |
|
|
Warrants and | |
|
Warrants and | |
|
(excluding | |
Plan Category |
|
Rights | |
|
Rights | |
|
Column(a)) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders United
Defense Incentive Award Plan
|
|
|
2,693,172 |
|
|
$ |
25.01 |
|
|
|
3,245,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,693,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,245,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Incentive Plan |
Our current Management Incentive Plan for our senior managers
was adopted in January 1998. The plan allows our senior managers
to achieve performance based compensation in addition to base
salary. Prior to 2004, target awards under the plan generally
varied from 15% to 65% of base salary depending on level of
seniority and overall performance of the individual and the
relevant business unit. Beginning in 2004, target awards under
the plan will generally vary from 15% to 75% of base salary.
Actual awards, however, are not guaranteed and may range from
zero to 200% of the applicable target award. See the discussion
of the Management Incentive Plan under the heading
Compensation Committee Report on Executive
Compensation for additional information on factors
considered in determining award amounts.
|
|
|
USMR Executive Bonus Plan |
The USMR Executive Bonus Plan was established in 1998. The plan
applies to 22 USMR executives. Generally target awards under the
plan vary from 70% to 90% of base salary. See the discussion of
the USMR Executive Bonus Plan under the heading
Compensation Committee Report on Executive
Compensation for additional information on factors
considered in determining award amounts.
In 2001, in connection with our recapitalization and in
anticipation of our initial public offering or a similar
significant corporate event, our board of directors adopted a
special bonus plan including special performance bonuses and a
retention incentive program for our key employees in order to
ensure their continuous full-time employment until the
completion of specified transactions. This plan was in addition
to, and did not in any way replace or reduce, any other
compensation, bonus, stock or option program offered to any of
our employees. In 2001, we granted bonuses totaling
$27.91 million in the aggregate under this plan, with
payments taking place on a staggered basis over 2001, 2002, and
2003. Each of Messrs. Rabaut, Raborn, Doty, and Howe were
granted bonuses under this plan and received payments of
$1,600,000, $800,000, $480,000, and $240,000, respectively in
2001; $1,625,000, $575,000, $692,500, and $460,000, respectively
in 2002, and $800,000, $400,000, $400,000, and $400,000,
respectively in 2003. In addition, over the same three-year
period, our three outside directors during that period, J.H.
Binford Peay, III, Robert M. Kimmitt, and
55
John M. Shalikashvili, were granted bonuses of $420,000,
$504,000, and $244,997, respectively under this plan.
Employment Agreements
Each of Messrs. Rabaut and Raborn entered into an
employment agreement with us on May 21, 1999. The initial
term of these agreements ended on December 31, 2001, but
each agreement has been automatically extended through
December 31, 2005, in accordance with the terms of the
agreements, and will continue to be so renewed for successive
one-year periods thereafter unless either party delivers notice
within specified notice periods. Mr. Krekich entered into
an employment agreement with us on December 12, 2002. The
initial term of this agreement ended on December 12, 2003,
but it has been automatically extended through December 12,
2005, in accordance with the terms of the agreement, and will
continue to be so renewed for successive one-year periods
thereafter unless either party delivers notice within specified
notice periods.
Under each agreement, the executive receives a stated annual
base salary and is eligible to participate in our discretionary
Management Incentive Plan as well as our employee benefit plans,
programs, and arrangements applicable to our other senior
officers. In addition to base salary, Mr. Rabaut is
eligible to receive a bonus of up to 75% of base salary under
our Management Incentive Plan, Mr. Raborn is eligible to
receive a bonus of up to 55% of base salary under our Management
Incentive Plan, and Mr. Krekich is eligible to receive a
discretionary bonus under the USMR Executive Bonus Plan.
Each of these employment agreements provides that upon
termination of employment, either by us without cause or by the
executive for good reason, each as defined in the agreements,
each executive will be entitled to:
|
|
|
|
|
a payment equal to a multiple of the executives base pay
and target bonus. For Mr. Krekich this severance period
will last two years, while for each of Messrs. Raborn and
Rabaut the severance period will last three years; |
|
|
|
a prorated discretionary bonus for that portion of the calendar
year in which he was terminated; |
|
|
|
the right to continue to participate in our health, life and
accidental death and dismemberment and long-term disability
benefits plan for the severance period at the rates in effect
for active employees; and |
|
|
|
an additional gross-up lump sum payment to cover the
costs of excise taxes, if any, to which he may be subject. |
Each of these employment agreements also provides that any
dispute or controversy arising under or in connection with the
respective agreement will be resolved exclusively by
arbitration. Effective January 7, 2005, each agreement was
amended to provide that in any such proceeding, the prevailing
party is entitled to all costs, fees and expenses (other than
the fees and expenses of the arbitrator, which are paid for by
us) incurred in connection with prosecuting or defending such
proceeding. The executive will be deemed to be the prevailing
party if he obtains any award or settlement in an amount of not
less than 50% of his initial base salary.
Messrs. Doty and Howe each entered into a severance
agreement with us on August 4, 1999. Pursuant to the terms
of these agreements, Messrs. Doty and Howe are entitled to
a stated termination payment if, during a two-year period of
time where we have entered into an agreement to effect a
corporate transaction, as defined in the agreements, the
executives employment is terminated either by us without
cause, or by the executive for good reason, each as defined in
the agreements. This termination payment is the greater of
either the amount of payment that the executive would otherwise
be entitled to under our general severance policy or an amount
equal to the sum of the executives annual base salary plus
the amount of his annual bonus and a prorated bonus to which he
is entitled under our Management Incentive Plan.
Messrs. Doty and Howe also have the right to continued
participation in our health, life and accidental death and
dismemberment and long-term disability benefit plans for one
year after the date of any such termination.
Each of these severance agreements also provides that any
dispute or controversy arising under or in connection with the
respective agreement will be resolved exclusively by
arbitration. Effective January 7, 2005,
56
each agreement was amended to provide that in any such
proceeding, the prevailing party is entitled to all costs, fees
and expenses (other than the fees and expenses of the
arbitrator, which are paid for by us) incurred in connection
with prosecuting or defending such proceeding. The executive
will be deemed to be the prevailing party if he obtains any
award or settlement in an amount of not less than 50% of his
initial base salary.
We also maintain a Severance Pay Plan that generally covers most
salaried and non-union hourly employees, and provides severance
payments in the event of the employees involuntary
termination of employment due to a reduction in force. Severance
payments provide 100% salary replacement up to a maximum of
36 weeks.
Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The compensation committee of our board of directors is
responsible for determining compensation and benefits for our
executive officers and other employees and administering our
United Defense Incentive Award Plan, Management Incentive Plan,
USMR Executive Bonus Plan, and other compensation programs. The
compensation committee is currently comprised of William E.
Conway, Jr., Robert J. Natter, and J.H. Binford
Peay, III.
The goals of our executive compensation programs are to:
(i) enable us to attract and retain key executives,
(ii) assist us in achieving our business objectives by
rewarding executives to the extent such objectives are achieved,
and (iii) encourage our executives identification
with the interests of our stockholders by providing a
significant element of potential executive compensation in the
form of stock or stock-based instruments.
Our current executive compensation program is composed primarily
of salary paid in cash and bonuses paid in cash, stock options,
and restricted stock. The compensation committee has determined
to use restricted stock awards rather than option grants as the
primary form of equity-based compensation in future periods.
The salaries of each of our executives, including our President
and Chief Executive Officer, or the President, are governed by
the nature and extent of the executives responsibilities;
the executives performance during the preceding year; and
comparative compensation levels for the executives peers,
both within UDI and in comparable companies. In making
comparisons with other employers, we primarily use data from
industrial businesses of comparable size in both the defense and
non-defense sectors. The salary of the President is established
by the compensation committee, subject to review by our board of
directors. The salary of our other executive officers is
established by the President, subject to review by the
compensation committee. For those executive officers holding
employment agreements (described above), such agreements include
a protective mechanism against any diminution of the
executives salary or bonus eligibility under the bonus
programs described below.
Our executive officers participate in the Management Incentive
Plan, or the MIP, which provides for the payment of annual cash
bonuses to the extent that pertinent objectives are achieved.
While the respective proportions may vary from year to year,
generally the largest two component objectives utilized under
the MIP have consisted of the extent to which we achieve annual
financial targets for cash flow and for earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or EBITDA. In
2004, the compensation committee began considering annual
financial targets for earnings per share as an objective under
the MIP in addition to cash flow and EBITDA. An additional MIP
component consists of a set of annual objectives established for
each participant, the nature of which vary by the
executives responsibilities and our business priorities.
The USMR Executive Bonus Plan, in which certain USMR executives,
including Mr. Krekich, participate, provides for the
payment of annual cash bonuses based on applicable performance
targets. While the relative weighting may vary from year to
year, the component performance objectives are EBITDA at the
USMR level, cash flow at the USMR level, and overall financial
performance of us as a whole. The nature and respective
weighting of MIP objectives and USMR plan objective is
established prospectively each year by the
57
compensation committee, and the payment of bonuses to
participants is determined by the compensation committee on the
basis of an annual, retrospective assessment of our and the
individuals performance.
The United Defense Incentive Award Plan, or the Stock Plan,
provides for the grant of various equity based compensation
including options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights,
dividend equivalents, deferred stock, restricted stock units,
performance awards, and stock payments to employees, directors,
and consultants. All of our executive officers participate in
the Stock Plan. To date, only options and restricted stock have
been granted under the Stock Plan. Options granted through
December 31, 2004 under the Stock Plan typically vest and
become exercisable over a period of several years. Since January
2003, vesting of options under the Stock Plan has been based on
continued employment; prior to 2003, annual vesting of options
derived in part from the participants continued
employment, and in larger part from our achievement of
pre-established objectives for cash flow and EBITDA. Restricted
stock granted under the Stock Plan is subject to full vesting on
the third anniversary of grant, based on the participants
continued employment or termination of employment under certain
limited circumstances. The Stock Plan also permits the use of
vesting criteria other than or in addition to continued
employment, and the compensation committee has decided to use
such criteria in future periods. Restricted stock is not
transferable prior to vesting and is ordinarily subject to
forfeiture if the participant terminates employment prior to
vesting. All awards under the Stock Plan are determined by the
compensation committee and/or our full board of directors as
appropriate, taking into account such factors as the nature of
the participants responsibilities, our business
priorities, and the levels of equity based compensation for the
participants peers both within UDI and at comparable
companies.
In 2001, we granted special performance and retention incentive
bonuses to certain of our key employees in connection with our
recapitalization and in anticipation of our initial public
offering or a similar significant corporate event. These bonuses
were in addition to the bonuses granted under the MIP. While we
do not currently anticipate granting similar bonuses in the
future, if a situation arises in which the board of directors
and the compensation committee were to determine that special
bonuses are warranted, we may again make special bonus grants,
the amount and terms of which would be subject to approval by
the compensation committee.
Based on its evaluation of the performance of the executive
officers, the compensation committee believes that our executive
officers are committed to achieving positive long-term financial
performance and enhanced stockholder value, and that the
compensation policies and programs discussed in this report have
motivated our executive officers to work toward these goals.
58
|
|
|
Tax Deductibility of Compensation |
Section 162(m) of the Code limits our federal income tax
deduction for certain executive compensation in excess of
$1.0 million paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the
four other most highly compensated executive officers. The
$1.0 million deduction limit does not apply, however, to
performance-based compensation as that term is
defined in Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code and the
regulations promulgated thereunder. The Stock Plan was amended
in 2004 so that awards granted under that plan may, subject to
certain conditions, qualify as performance based compensation
under Section 162(m) of the Code. The compensation
committee recognizes the possibility that if the amount of the
base salary and other compensation of a named executive officer
exceeds $1.0 million, it may not be fully deductible for
federal income tax purposes. The compensation committee will
make a determination at any such time whether to authorize the
payment of such amounts without regard to deductibility or
whether the terms of such payment should be modified as to
preserve any deduction otherwise available.
|
|
|
Compensation Committee: |
|
|
William E. Conway, Jr. |
|
Robert J. Natter |
|
J. H. Binford Peay, III |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
During 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
the compensation committee was comprised of Peter J. Clare, and
J. H. Binford Peay, III until August 2004 at which point
Mr. Clare rotated off the committee and Messrs. Conway
and Natter joined the committee; |
|
|
|
none of the members of the compensation committee was an officer
(or former officer) or employee of us or any of our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
none of the members of the compensation committee entered into
(or agreed to enter into) any transaction or series of
transactions with us or any of our subsidiaries in which the
amount involved exceeds $60,000; |
|
|
|
none of our executive officers served on the compensation
committee (or another board committee with similar functions) of
any entity where one of that entitys executive officers
served on our compensation committee; |
|
|
|
none of our executive officers was a director of another entity
where one of that entitys executive officers served on our
compensation committee; and |
|
|
|
none of our executive officers served on the compensation
committee (or another board committee with similar functions) of
another entity where one of that entitys executive
officers served as a director on our board of directors. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management
The following table provides summary information regarding
beneficial ownership of our outstanding capital stock as of
March 1, 2005, for:
|
|
|
|
|
each person or group who beneficially owns more than 5% of our
capital stock on a fully diluted basis; |
|
|
|
certain of our executive officers; |
|
|
|
each of our directors; and |
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group. |
59
Beneficial ownership of shares is determined under the rules of
the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person
exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. Except as
indicated by footnote, and subject to applicable community
property laws, each person identified in the table possesses
sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of
our common stock held by such person. Shares of our common stock
subject to options currently exercisable or exercisable within
the period 60 days after March 1, 2005, are deemed
outstanding for calculating the percentage of outstanding shares
of the person holding these options, but are not deemed
outstanding for calculating the percentage of any other person.
Unless otherwise noted, the address for each director and
executive officer is c/o United Defense Industries, Inc.,
1525 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, Virginia 22209.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Barclays group(1)
|
|
|
5,390,061 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Putnam, LLC d/b/a Putnam Investments(2)
|
|
|
4,568,636 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
FMR Corp.(3)
|
|
|
3,289,309 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Wellington Management Company(4)
|
|
|
3,212,900 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
William E. Conway, Jr.(5)
|
|
|
199,493 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Natter
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Peter J. Clare(5)
|
|
|
11,916 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Frank C. Carlucci(5)
|
|
|
30,146 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
J.H. Binford Peay, III
|
|
|
65,325 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Shalikashvili
|
|
|
15,682 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Rabaut
|
|
|
467,270 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Francis Raborn
|
|
|
390,010 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
C. Thomas Faulders, III
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Elmer L. Doty
|
|
|
178,931 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Keith B. Howe
|
|
|
55,303 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander J. Krekich
|
|
|
95,673 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
All Current Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
(15 persons)
|
|
|
1,662,806 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
* |
Denotes less than 1% beneficial ownership |
|
(1) |
The information regarding this stockholder is derived from a
Schedule 13G filed by the stockholder with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 15, 2005. The address
of this stockholder is 45 Fremont Street, San Francisco,
California 94105. |
|
(2) |
The information regarding this stockholder is derived from a
Schedule 13G filed by the stockholder with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2005. The address
of this stockholder is One Post Office Square, Boston,
Massachusetts 02109. |
|
(3) |
The information regarding this stockholder is derived from a
Schedule 13G/ A filed by the stockholder with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005.
The address of this stockholder is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02109. |
|
(4) |
The information regarding this stockholder is derived from a
Schedule 13G filed by the stockholder with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005. The address
of this stockholder is 75 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts
02109. |
|
(5) |
The address of such person is c/o The Carlyle Group, 1001
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20004. |
60
Performance Graph
We commenced our initial public offering and began trading on
the NYSE on December 14, 2001. The chart above compares the
relative changes in the cumulative total return of our common
stock for the period from December 14, 2001 to
December 31, 2004, against the cumulative total return of
the S&P 500 Stock Index and the S&P 1500
Aerospace & Defense Index for the same period.
The chart above assumes that on December 14, 2001, $100 was
invested in our common stock and in each of the indices. The
comparisons assume that all dividends, if any, were reinvested.
The chart indicates the dollar value of each hypothetical $100
investment based on the closing price as of the last trading day
of each month from December 2001 to December 2004.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
In October 1997, we entered into a management agreement with TC
Group Management, L.L.C., an affiliate of The Carlyle Group, for
management and financial advisory services and oversight to be
provided to us and our subsidiaries. The management agreement
provides for the payment to Carlyle of an annual management fee
of $2.0 million. The management agreement terminated once
Carlyles ownership of our stock fell below 10% in February
2004.
We have employment agreements with certain of our named
executive officers as described above under
Employment Agreements.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and
directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of our stock to file reports of ownership and
changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors, and
greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC
regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a)
reports they file. Based on our records and other information,
we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements
applicable to our directors and executive officers for 2004 were
timely met, except that John W. Hendrix filed a late Form 4
reporting two transactions in January 2004.
61
Relationship with Independent Public Accountants
The audit and ethics committee has reappointed Ernst &
Young LLP as the independent public accounting firm to audit our
financial statements for the fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2005, in the event the merger described herein
is not consummated prior to December 31, 2005. In making
this appointment, the audit and ethics committee considered
whether the audit and non-audit services Ernst & Young
LLP provides are compatible with maintaining the independence of
our outside auditors. The audit and ethics committee has adopted
a policy that set forth the manner in which the audit and ethics
committee will review and approve all services to be provided by
Ernst & Young LLP before the firm is retained. The
policy requires an individual review by the committee in advance
of each service to be provided by Ernst & Young LLP.
Fees and Services of Ernst & Young LLP
The following table summarizes fees billed to us by
Ernst & Young LLP during fiscal years 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees | |
|
|
| |
Service |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ In thousands) | |
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Audit
|
|
|
2850 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory Audit
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
SEC Filings
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit of defined benefit and postretirement plans
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
Audit of USMR LS-513 report (workers compensation)
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consultation regarding Sarbanes Oxley Section 404 compliance
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Consulting Services
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access to E&Y web-based accounting research material and
purchase of E&Y proprietary software (FAS123)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
IT support (balanced scorecard)
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The audit committee pre-approved 100 percent of the
services covered under the captions Audit-Related
Fees, Tax Fees, and Other Fees for
fiscal years 2003 and 2004.
62
MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Our sole class of common equity is our $0.01 par value
common stock, which is traded on the NYSE under the symbol
UDI. Trading in our common stock commenced on the
NYSE on December 14, 2001. As of March 21, 2005, there
were 38 stockholders of record with approximately
7,200 beneficial shareholders of our common stock.
The closing sale price per share of our common stock, as
reported by the NYSE on March 4, 2005, the last full
trading day before the public announcement of the proposed
merger, was $58.26. On April 5, 2005, the last full trading
day before the date of this proxy statement, the closing price
for shares of our common stock, as reported by the NYSE, was
$73.50. You are encouraged to obtain current market quotations
for our common stock in connection with voting your shares.
The table below shows, for the quarters indicated the reported
high and low trading prices of our common stock on the NYSE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Calendar Year 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
24.75 |
|
|
$ |
20.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
27.12 |
|
|
|
21.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
29.69 |
|
|
|
25.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
34.15 |
|
|
|
28.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
34.31 |
|
|
$ |
28.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
35.75 |
|
|
|
31.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
40.24 |
|
|
|
33.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
48.98 |
|
|
|
38.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through April 5, 2005)
|
|
$ |
73.91 |
|
|
$ |
43.59 |
|
We did not pay any dividends in 2003 or 2004, but we paid a
quarterly dividend of $0.125 per share on March 1,
2005 to stockholders of record on February 15, 2005.
63
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements contained in this proxy statement, and the
documents to which we refer you in this proxy statement, contain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements are based on current expectations, forecasts and
assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those set
forth in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements. We have
attempted, whenever possible, to identify these forward-looking
statements using words such as may,
will, should, projects,
estimates, expects, plans,
intends, anticipates,
believes, and variations of these words and similar
expressions. Similarly, statements herein that describe our
business strategy, prospects, opportunities, outlook,
objectives, plans, intentions or goals are also forward-looking
statements. These statements are based on managements
current expectations and are subject to risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties
materialize or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual results may vary materially from those results
anticipated, estimated, expected, intended or projected.
We cannot give any assurance that the merger will be
consummated. Factors that could affect whether the transaction
is completed include the satisfaction or waiver of a number of
conditions, including obtaining clearance from regulatory
authorities. In addition, the statements in this proxy statement
are made as of April 6, 2005. We expect that subsequent
events or developments will cause our views to change. We
undertake no obligation to update any of the forward-looking
statements made herein, whether as a result of new information,
future events, changes in expectations or otherwise. These
forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as
representing our views as of any date subsequent to
April 6, 2005.
MULTIPLE STOCKHOLDERS SHARING ONE ADDRESS
In accordance with Rule 14a3(e)(1) under the Exchange
Act, one proxy statement will be delivered to two or more
stockholders who share an address, unless we have received
contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. We
will deliver promptly upon written or oral request a separate
copy of the proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address
to which a single copy of the proxy statement was delivered.
Requests for additional copies of the proxy statement, and
requests that in the future separate proxy statements be sent to
stockholders who share an address, should be directed to United
Defense Industries, Inc., Investor Relations, 1525 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, Virginia 22209, and our
telephone number is (703) 312-6100. Similarly, if you share
an address with another stockholder and have received multiple
copies of our proxy materials, you may write or call us at the
above address and phone number to request delivery of a single
copy of these materials.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
If the merger is completed, we will no longer be a publicly
traded company and there will be no public participation in any
future meetings of our stockholders. However, if the merger is
not completed, our stockholders will continue to be entitled to
attend and participate in our stockholders meetings.
Our bylaws provide that stockholders desiring to nominate a
director or bring any other business before the stockholders at
an annual meeting must notify our Secretary thereof in writing
during the period 120 to 90 days before the first
anniversary of the date of the preceding years annual
meeting (or, if the date of the annual meeting is more than
30 days before or more than 70 days after such
anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be
so delivered during the period 120 to 90 days before such
annual meeting or 10 days following the day on which public
announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by us).
In the event that the number of directors to be elected is
increased and there is no public announcement by us naming all
of the nominees for director or specifying the size of the
increased board of directors at least 100 days before the
first anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting, a
stockholders notice required by our bylaws will be timely,
but only with respect to the nominees for any new positions
created by such increase, if such notice is delivered to our
Secretary no later than 10 days following the day on which
such public announcement is first made by us. These stockholder
notices must set forth certain information specified in our
bylaws.
64
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE
INFORMATION
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, which we have filed with the
SEC, accompanies this proxy statement. Stockholders may obtain,
free of charge, additional copies of the Form 10-K by
writing to United Defense Industries, Inc., Attn.: Investor
Relations, 1525 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington,
Virginia 22209. Stockholders may also obtain a copy of the
Form 10-K by accessing our website at www.uniteddefense.com.
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any
document we file at the SECs Public Reference Room at
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You
may obtain more information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC
also maintains an internet website located at
http://www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy statements and
other information regarding companies that file electronically
with the SEC.
In addition, we incorporate by reference any future filings we
make with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14, or 15(d)
of the Exchange Act after the date of this proxy statement and
before the date of the annual meeting (excluding any current
reports on Form 8-K to the extent disclosure is furnished
and not filed). Those documents are considered to be a part of
this proxy statement, effective as of the date they are filed.
In the event of conflicting information between those documents
and this proxy statement, the information in the latest filed
document should be considered correct.
You can obtain any of these from the SEC, through the SECs
web site at the address described above, or by requesting them
in writing from us at the address set forth above.
65
ANNEX A
EXECUTION COPY
The merger agreement has been included to provide you with
information regarding its terms. It is not intended to provide
you with any factual information about us. Such information can
be found elsewhere in this proxy statement and in the other
public filings we make with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, which are available without charge at
www.sec.gov.
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
Dated as of March 6, 2005,
Among
BAE SYSTEMS NORTH AMERICA INC.,
UTE ACQUISITION COMPANY INC.
And
UNITED DEFENSE INDUSTRIES, INC.
A-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
ARTICLE I
The Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 1.01. |
|
|
The Merger |
|
|
A-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 1.02. |
|
|
Closing |
|
|
A-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 1.03. |
|
|
Effective Time |
|
|
A-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 1.04. |
|
|
Effects |
|
|
A-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 1.05. |
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws |
|
|
A-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 1.06. |
|
|
Directors |
|
|
A-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 1.07. |
|
|
Officers |
|
|
A-8 |
|
|
ARTICLE II
Effect on the Capital Stock of the
Constituent Corporations; Exchange of Certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 2.01. |
|
|
Effect on Capital Stock |
|
|
A-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 2.02. |
|
|
Exchange of Certificates |
|
|
A-9 |
|
|
ARTICLE III
Representations and Warranties of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.01. |
|
|
Organization, Standing and Power |
|
|
A-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.02. |
|
|
Company Subsidiaries; Equity Interests |
|
|
A-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.03. |
|
|
Capital Structure |
|
|
A-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.04. |
|
|
Authority; Execution and Delivery; Enforceability |
|
|
A-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.05. |
|
|
No Conflicts; Consents |
|
|
A-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.06. |
|
|
SEC Documents; Undisclosed Liabilities |
|
|
A-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.07. |
|
|
Information Supplied |
|
|
A-15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.08. |
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events |
|
|
A-15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.09. |
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
A-17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.10. |
|
|
Absence of Changes in Benefit Plans; Labor Relations |
|
|
A-18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.11. |
|
|
ERISA Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments |
|
|
A-18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.12. |
|
|
Proceedings |
|
|
A-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.13. |
|
|
Compliance with Applicable Laws |
|
|
A-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.14. |
|
|
Compliance with Environmental Laws |
|
|
A-21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.15. |
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
A-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.16. |
|
|
Customers and Suppliers |
|
|
A-24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.17. |
|
|
Title to Properties |
|
|
A-24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.18. |
|
|
Intellectual Property |
|
|
A-24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.19. |
|
|
Brokers; Schedule of Fees and Expenses |
|
|
A-25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 3.20. |
|
|
Opinions of Financial Advisors |
|
|
A-25 |
|
|
ARTICLE IV
Representations and Warranties of Parent and Sub |
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 4.01. |
|
|
Organization, Standing and Power |
|
|
A-25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 4.02. |
|
|
Sub |
|
|
A-25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 4.03. |
|
|
Authority; Execution and Delivery; Enforceability |
|
|
A-25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 4.04. |
|
|
No Conflicts; Consents |
|
|
A-26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 4.05. |
|
|
Information Supplied |
|
|
A-26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 4.06. |
|
|
Brokers |
|
|
A-26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 4.07. |
|
|
Section 203 of the DGCL |
|
|
A-26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 4.08. |
|
|
Financial Capability |
|
|
A-26 |
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ARTICLE V
Covenants Relating to Conduct of Business |
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 5.01. |
|
|
Conduct of Business |
|
|
A-27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 5.02. |
|
|
No Solicitation |
|
|
A-30 |
|
|
ARTICLE VI
Additional Agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6.01. |
|
|
Preparation of Proxy Statement and UK Parent Circular;
Stockholders Meeting |
|
|
A-32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6.02. |
|
|
Access to Information; Confidentiality |
|
|
A-33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6.03. |
|
|
Reasonable Best Efforts; Notification |
|
|
A-33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6.04. |
|
|
Stock Options; Restricted Stock |
|
|
A-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6.05. |
|
|
Employee Matters |
|
|
A-35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6.06. |
|
|
Indemnification |
|
|
A-35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6.07. |
|
|
Fees and Expenses |
|
|
A-36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6.08. |
|
|
Public Announcements |
|
|
A-37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6.09. |
|
|
Transfer Taxes |
|
|
A-37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6.10. |
|
|
Stockholder Litigation |
|
|
A-37 |
|
|
ARTICLE VII
Conditions Precedent |
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 7.01. |
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation To Effect The Merger |
|
|
A-37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 7.02. |
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Sub |
|
|
A-38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 7.03. |
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of the Company |
|
|
A-39 |
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
Termination, Amendment and Waiver |
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 8.01. |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
A-39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 8.02. |
|
|
Effect of Termination |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 8.03. |
|
|
Amendment |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 8.04. |
|
|
Extension; Waiver |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 8.05. |
|
|
Procedure for Termination, Amendment, Extension or Waiver |
|
|
A-41 |
|
|
ARTICLE IX
General Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.01. |
|
|
Nonsurvival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements |
|
|
A-41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.02. |
|
|
Notices |
|
|
A-41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.03. |
|
|
Definitions |
|
|
A-42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.04. |
|
|
Interpretation |
|
|
A-42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.05. |
|
|
Severability |
|
|
A-43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.06. |
|
|
Counterparts |
|
|
A-43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.07. |
|
|
Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries |
|
|
A-43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.08. |
|
|
Disclosure Generally |
|
|
A-43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.09. |
|
|
Governing Law |
|
|
A-43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.10. |
|
|
Assignment |
|
|
A-43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 9.11. |
|
|
Enforcement |
|
|
A-43 |
|
EXHIBIT A Certificate of Incorporation of Surviving
Corporation
A-3
GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS
|
|
|
|
|
Term |
|
Section | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Agreement
|
|
|
5.02(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
|
5.02(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
affiliate
|
|
|
9.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated Group
|
|
|
3.09(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
AJC Act
|
|
|
5.01(a)(v) |
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-Bribery Laws
|
|
|
3.13(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
Appraisal Shares
|
|
|
2.01(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
Bid
|
|
|
3.15(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
Bofors
|
|
|
3.05(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
business day
|
|
|
9.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Merger
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
2.02(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
CFIUS
|
|
|
6.03(b)(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Date
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Code
|
|
|
2.02(h) |
|
|
|
|
|
Commonly Controlled Entity
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Preamble |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Benefit Agreements
|
|
|
3.08(e)(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Benefit Plans
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Board
|
|
|
3.04(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Bylaws
|
|
|
3.03(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Capital Stock
|
|
|
3.03(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Charter
|
|
|
3.03(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Common Stock
|
|
|
Recitals |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Credit Agreement
|
|
|
3.03(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Disclosure Letter
|
|
|
Article III |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Financial Statements
|
|
|
3.06(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Government Contract
|
|
|
3.15(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Government Subcontract
|
|
|
3.15(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Lease
|
|
|
3.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Material Adverse Change
|
|
|
9.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
9.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Pension Plan
|
|
|
3.11(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Preferred Stock
|
|
|
3.03(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Restricted Stock
|
|
|
3.03(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company SEC Documents
|
|
|
3.06(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Stock-Based Awards
|
|
|
3.03(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Stockholder Approval
|
|
|
3.04(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
6.01(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Stock Options
|
|
|
3.03(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Stock Plan
|
|
|
3.03(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Subsidiaries
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
|
6.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consent
|
|
|
3.05(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Employees
|
|
|
6.05(a) |
|
A-4
|
|
|
|
|
Term |
|
Section | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
3.05(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Contract with a Related Person
|
|
|
3.08(j) |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Arrangements
|
|
|
5.01(a)(v) |
|
|
|
|
|
Designated Party
|
|
|
6.07(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
DGCL
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
DOJ
|
|
|
6.03(b)(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Draft 2004 10-K
|
|
|
Article III |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Claim
|
|
|
3.14(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Laws
|
|
|
3.14(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Permits
|
|
|
3.14(a)(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
ERISA
|
|
|
3.11(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Act
|
|
|
3.05(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
|
2.02(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exon-Florio
|
|
|
3.05(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Export Control Laws
|
|
|
3.13(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Filed Company SEC Documents
|
|
|
Article III |
|
|
|
|
|
FTC
|
|
|
6.03(b)(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
3.06(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Governmental Entity
|
|
|
3.05(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hazardous Materials
|
|
|
3.14(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
HSR Act
|
|
|
3.05(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Indemnified Party
|
|
|
6.06(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual Property Rights
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
IRS
|
|
|
3.09(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
Joint Filing
|
|
|
6.03(b)(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
Judgment
|
|
|
3.05(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Law
|
|
|
3.05(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
3.02(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Material Company Contract
|
|
|
3.15(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Premium
|
|
|
6.06(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
Recitals |
|
|
|
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
2.01(c)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Outside Date
|
|
|
8.01(b)(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Preamble |
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
9.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paying Agent
|
|
|
2.02(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Permits
|
|
|
3.13(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
person
|
|
|
9.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Signing Returns
|
|
|
5.01(b)(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy Statement
|
|
|
3.05(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Release
|
|
|
3.14(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Representatives
|
|
|
5.02(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
SEC
|
|
|
Article III |
|
A-5
|
|
|
|
|
Term |
|
Section | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Section 262
|
|
|
2.01(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Act
|
|
|
3.06(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
SOX
|
|
|
3.06(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
Preamble |
|
|
|
|
|
subsidiary
|
|
|
9.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
|
5.02(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
Surviving Corporation
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Takeover Proposal
|
|
|
5.02(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
taxes
|
|
|
3.09(j)(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
tax return
|
|
|
3.09(j)(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Termination Fee
|
|
|
6.07(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer Taxes
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
UKLA
|
|
|
4.04(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
UK Parent
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
UK Parent Circular
|
|
|
6.01(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
UK Parent Letter
|
|
|
6.01(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
UK Parent Shareholder Approval
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
UK Parent Shareholder Meeting
|
|
|
6.01(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
Voting Company Debt
|
|
|
3.03(c) |
|
A-6
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER dated as of March 6, 2005,
among BAE SYSTEMS NORTH AMERICA INC., a Delaware corporation
(Parent), UTE ACQUISITION COMPANY INC., a
Delaware corporation (Sub) and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent, and UNITED DEFENSE INDUSTRIES, INC., a
Delaware corporation (the Company).
WHEREAS the respective Boards of Directors of Parent, Sub and
the Company have approved Parents acquisition of the
Company on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in
this Agreement;
WHEREAS the respective boards of directors of Parent, Sub and
the Company have approved this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby, including the merger of Sub with and into
the Company (the Merger) whereby each issued
and outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, of the Company (the Company Common
Stock) not owned by Parent, Sub or the Company or any
of their respective subsidiaries shall be converted into the
right to receive $75.00 in cash; and
WHEREAS Parent, Sub and the Company desire to make certain
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in
connection with the Merger and also to prescribe various
conditions to the Merger.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
The Merger
Section 1.01. The
Merger. On the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in this Agreement, and in accordance with the Delaware
General Corporation Law (the DGCL), Sub shall
be merged with and into the Company at the Effective Time. At
the Effective Time, the separate corporate existence of Sub
shall cease and the Company shall continue as the surviving
corporation (the Surviving Corporation). At
the election of Parent, any direct or indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent may be substituted for Sub as a constituent
corporation in the Merger. In such event, the parties shall
execute an appropriate amendment to this Agreement in order to
reflect the foregoing.
Section 1.02. Closing.
The closing of the Merger (the Closing) shall
take place at the offices of Cravath, Swaine & Moore
LLP, 825 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10019 at
10:00 a.m. on the second business day following the
satisfaction (or, to the extent permitted by Law, waiver by the
party or parties entitled to the benefits thereof) of all the
conditions set forth in Article VII (other than any
condition that by its nature cannot be satisfied until the
Closing, but subject to satisfaction of any such condition), or
at such other place, time and date as shall be agreed in writing
between Parent and the Company; provided, however,
that if all the conditions set forth in Article VII shall
not have been satisfied (or, to the extent permitted by Law,
waived by the party or parties entitled to the benefits thereof)
on such second business day, then the Closing will take place on
the first business day on which all such conditions shall have
been satisfied (or, to the extent permitted by Law, waived by
the party or parties entitled to the benefits thereof). The date
on which the Closing occurs is referred to in this Agreement as
the Closing Date.
Section 1.03. Effective
Time. Prior to the Closing, the parties shall prepare,
and on the Closing Date or as soon as practicable thereafter
shall file with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware,
a certificate of merger or other appropriate documents (in any
such case, the Certificate of Merger)
executed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the DGCL
and shall make all other filings or recordings required under
the DGCL. The Merger shall become effective at such time as the
Certificate of Merger is duly filed with such Secretary of
State, or at such other time as Parent and the Company shall
agree and specify in the Certificate of Merger (the time the
Merger becomes effective being the Effective
Time).
Section 1.04. Effects.
The Merger shall have the effects set forth in Section 259
of the DGCL.
A-7
Section 1.05. Certificate
of Incorporation and Bylaws. (a) The Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as in
effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall be amended
at the Effective Time to read in the form of Exhibit A,
and, as so amended, such certificate of incorporation shall be
the Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation
until thereafter changed or amended as provided therein or by
applicable Law.
(b) The Bylaws of Sub as in effect immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall be the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation
until thereafter changed or amended as provided therein or by
applicable Law.
Section 1.06. Directors.
The directors of Sub immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall be the directors of the Surviving Corporation, until the
earlier of their resignation or removal or until their
respective successors are duly elected and qualified, as the
case may be.
Section 1.07. Officers.
The officers of the Company immediately prior to the Effective
Time shall be the officers of the Surviving Corporation, until
the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their
respective successors are duly elected or appointed and
qualified, as the case may be.
ARTICLE II
Effect on the Capital Stock of the
Constituent Corporations; Exchange of Certificates
Section 2.01. Effect
on Capital Stock. At the Effective Time, by virtue of
the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of
any shares of Company Common Stock or any shares of capital
stock of Sub:
|
|
|
(a) Capital Stock of Sub. Each issued and
outstanding share of capital stock of Sub shall be converted
into and become one fully paid and nonassessable share of common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Surviving
Corporation. |
|
|
(b) Cancelation of Treasury Stock and Parent-Owned
Stock. Each share of Company Common Stock that is owned
by the Company, Parent, Sub or by any of their respective wholly
owned subsidiaries shall automatically be canceled and retired
and shall cease to exist, and no consideration shall be
delivered or deliverable in exchange therefor. |
|
|
(c) Conversion of Company Common Stock.
(1) Subject to Sections 2.01(b) and 2.01(d), each
issued and outstanding share of Company Common Stock shall be
converted into the right to receive $75.00 in cash. |
|
|
(2) The cash payable upon the conversion of shares of
Company Common Stock pursuant to Section 2.01(c)(1) is
referred to as the Merger Consideration. As
of the Effective Time, all such shares of Company Common Stock
shall no longer be outstanding and shall automatically be
canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and each holder
of a certificate representing any such shares of Company Common
Stock shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto,
except the right to receive the Merger Consideration and certain
dividends or other distributions in accordance with
Section 2.02(c) upon surrender of such certificate in
accordance with Section 2.02, in each case, without
interest. |
|
|
(d) Appraisal Rights. Notwithstanding
anything in this Agreement to the contrary, shares
(Appraisal Shares) of Company Common Stock
that are outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and
that are held by any person who is entitled to demand and
properly demands appraisal of such Appraisal Shares pursuant to,
and who complies in all respects with, Section 262 of the
DGCL (Section 262) shall not be
converted into the right to receive Merger Consideration as
provided in Section 2.01(c), but rather the holders of
Appraisal Shares shall be entitled to payment of the fair market
value of such Appraisal Shares in accordance with
Section 262; provided, however, that if any
such holder shall fail to perfect, or otherwise shall waive,
withdraw or lose, the right to appraisal under Section 262,
then the right of such holder to be paid the fair value of such
holders Appraisal Shares shall cease and such Appraisal
Shares shall be deemed to have been converted as of the
Effective Time into, and to have become exchangeable solely for
the right to receive, Merger |
A-8
|
|
|
Consideration as provided in Section 2.01(c). The Company
shall serve prompt notice to Parent of any demands received by
the Company for appraisal of any shares of Company Common Stock,
and Parent shall have the right to participate in and direct all
negotiations and proceedings with respect to such demands. Prior
to the Effective Time, the Company shall not, without the prior
written consent of Parent, make any payment with respect to, or
settle or offer to settle, any such demands, or agree to do any
of the foregoing. |
Section 2.02. Exchange
of Certificates. (a) Paying Agent.
Prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall select a bank or trust
company reasonably satisfactory to the Company to act as paying
agent (the Paying Agent) for the payment of
the Merger Consideration upon surrender of Certificates. Parent
will enter into a paying agent agreement in form and substance
reasonably acceptable to the Company. Parent shall provide, or
cause to be provided to the Paying Agent at the Effective Time,
cash necessary to pay for the shares of Company Common Stock
converted into the right to receive Merger Consideration
pursuant to Section 2.01(c) (such cash being hereinafter
referred to as the Exchange Fund).
(b) Exchange Procedure. As soon as reasonably
practicable after the Effective Time, Parent shall cause the
Paying Agent to mail to each holder of record of a certificate
or certificates (the Certificates) that
immediately prior to the Effective Time represented outstanding
shares of Company Common Stock that were converted into the
right to receive Merger Consideration pursuant to
Section 2.01(c), (i) a letter of transmittal (which
shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss
and title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon delivery of
the Certificates to the Paying Agent and shall be in such form
and have such other provisions as Parent and the Company may
reasonably specify) and (ii) instructions for use in
effecting the surrender of the Certificates in exchange for
Merger Consideration. Upon surrender of a Certificate for
cancelation to the Paying Agent, together with such letter of
transmittal, duly executed, and such other documents as may
reasonably be required by the Paying Agent, the holder of such
Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor
the amount of cash into which the shares of Company Common Stock
theretofore represented by such Certificate shall have been
converted pursuant to Section 2.01(c) and certain dividends
and other distributions in respect of Company Common Stock in
accordance with Section 2.02(c), and the Certificate so
surrendered shall forthwith be canceled. In the event of a
transfer of ownership of Company Common Stock that is not
registered in the transfer records of the Company, payment may
be made to a person other than the person in whose name the
Certificate so surrendered is registered, if such Certificate
shall be properly endorsed or otherwise be in proper form for
transfer and the person requesting such payment shall pay any
transfer or other taxes required by reason of the payment to a
person other than the registered holder of such Certificate or
establish to the satisfaction of Parent that such tax has been
paid or is not applicable. Until surrendered as contemplated by
this Section 2.02, each Certificate shall be deemed at any
time after the Effective Time to represent only the right to
receive upon such surrender the Merger Consideration and certain
dividends or other distributions in accordance with
Section 2.02(c). No interest shall be paid or accrue on the
cash payable upon surrender of any Certificate.
(c) No Further Ownership Rights in Company Common
Stock. The Merger Consideration paid in accordance with
the terms of this Article II upon surrender of any
Certificate shall be deemed to have been paid in full
satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such shares of Company
Common Stock, subject, however, to the Surviving
Corporations obligation to pay any dividends or make any
other distributions with a record date prior to the Effective
Time that may have been declared or made by the Company on such
shares of Company Common Stock in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement or prior to the date of this Agreement and which
remain unpaid at the Effective Time, and after the Effective
Time there shall be no further registration of transfers on the
stock transfer books of the Surviving Corporation of shares of
Company Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, any
Certificates are presented to the Surviving Corporation or the
Paying Agent for any reason, they shall be canceled and
exchanged as provided in this Article II.
(d) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any portion
of the Exchange Fund that remains undistributed to the holders
of Company Common Stock for 12 months after the Effective
Time shall be delivered to
A-9
Parent, upon demand, and any holder of Company Common Stock who
has not theretofore complied with this Article II shall
thereafter look only to Parent for payment of its claim for
Merger Consideration.
(e) No Liability. None of Parent, Sub, the
Company, the Surviving Corporation or the Paying Agent shall be
liable to any person in respect of any cash from the Exchange
Fund properly delivered to a public official pursuant to any
applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar Law.
(f) Investment of Exchange Fund. The Parent
may cause the Paying Agent to invest any cash included in the
Exchange Fund, as directed by Parent, on a daily basis. Any
interest and other income resulting from such investments shall
be paid to Parent. In no case, however, shall any such
investment or any such payment of interest delay the receipt by
holders of Certificates of the Merger Consideration or otherwise
impair such holders rights hereunder.
(g) Lost Certificates. If any Certificate has
been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit
of that fact by the person claiming such Certificate to be lost,
stolen or destroyed and, if required by Parent, the posting by
such person of a bond in such reasonable amount as Parent may
direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against
it with respect to such Certificate, the Paying Agent will pay
in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the
Merger Consideration with respect thereto, without interest.
(h) Withholding Rights. Parent, the Surviving
Corporation and the Paying Agent shall be entitled to deduct and
withhold from the consideration otherwise payable to any holder
of Company Common Stock pursuant to this Agreement such amounts
as may be required to be deducted and withheld with respect to
the making of such payment under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the Code), or under any
provision of any supranational, national, federal, state,
provincial, local or municipal (whether domestic or foreign) tax
Law. To the extent that amounts are so withheld and paid over to
the appropriate taxing authority by Parent, the Surviving
Corporation or the Paying Agent, such withheld amounts shall be
treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid
to the holder of the shares of Company Common Stock in respect
of which such deduction and withholding was made by Parent, the
Surviving Corporation or the Paying Agent, as applicable.
ARTICLE III
Representations and Warranties of the Company
Except as set forth (i) in the reports, schedules, forms,
statements and other documents filed by the Company with, or
furnished by the Company to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) and publicly available
prior to the date of this Agreement (the Filed Company
SEC Documents), other than any disclosure of risks
generally faced by participants in the industries in which the
Company operates or descriptions of general risks not related to
specifically disclosed facts or circumstances, (ii) in the
letter dated the date of this Agreement, from the Company to
Parent (the Company Disclosure Letter) or
(iii) in the draft Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Draft 2004 10-K), a copy of which has been
provided to Parent and is attached to the Company Disclosure
Letter, other than any disclosure of risks generally faced by
participants in the industries in which the Company operates or
descriptions of general risks not related to specifically
disclosed facts or circumstances, the Company represents and
warrants to Parent and Sub as follows:
Section 3.01. Organization,
Standing and Power. Each of the Company and each of the
Company Subsidiaries is duly organized, validly existing and in
good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is
organized and has full corporate power and authority to conduct
its businesses as presently conducted. For purposes of this
Agreement, Company Subsidiary means each
subsidiary of the Company, provided that (other than for
purposes of Sections 3.12(b), 3.13(c) and 7.02(a) (insofar
as it relates to Sections 3.12(b) and 3.13(c))) the term
Company Subsidiary shall not include FNSS
Savunma Sistemleri A.S. and Bofors Defence Asia Sdn Bhd. The
Company and each Company Subsidiary is duly qualified to do
business in each jurisdiction where the nature of its business
or its ownership or
A-10
leasing of its properties make such qualification necessary,
except where the failure to be so qualified, individually or in
the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.02. Company
Subsidiaries; Equity Interests. (a) All the
outstanding shares of capital stock of each Company Subsidiary
have been validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable
and are owned by the Company, by a wholly owned Company
Subsidiary or by the Company and a wholly owned Company
Subsidiary, free and clear of all pledges, liens, charges,
mortgages, encumbrances and security interests of any kind or
nature whatsoever (collectively, Liens).
(b) As of the date of this Agreement, except for its
interests in the Company Subsidiaries, the Company does not own,
directly or indirectly, any capital stock, membership interest,
partnership interest, joint venture interest or other equity
interest with a fair market value as of the date of this
Agreement in excess of $10,000,000 in any person.
Section 3.03. Capital
Structure. (a) The authorized capital stock of the
Company consists of 150,000,000 shares of Company Common
Stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.01 per share (the Company Preferred
Stock and, together with the Company Common Stock, the
Company Capital Stock). At the close of
business on February 28, 2005,
(i) 50,801,291 shares of Company Common Stock were
issued and outstanding, of which 414,872 shares issued
pursuant to the Companys Incentive Award Plan or its
predecessor plan (collectively, the Company Stock
Plan) were subject to vesting and restrictions on
transfer (collectively, Company Restricted
Stock), (ii) 2,491,800 shares of Company
Common Stock were held by the Company in its treasury and
(iii) 9,375,000 shares of Company Common Stock were
reserved and available for issuance pursuant to the Company
Stock Plan, of which 2,498,532 shares were subject to
outstanding options to purchase shares of Company Common Stock
(collectively, Company Stock Options) with a
weighted-average exercise price of $21.67.
(b) Except as set forth above, at the close of business on
February 28, 2005, no shares of capital stock or other
voting securities or equity interests of the Company were
issued, reserved for issuance, outstanding or held by the
Company in its treasury. As of the date of this Agreement,
(other than Company Stock Options), there were no outstanding
options, stock appreciation rights, phantom stock
rights, performance awards, units, dividend equivalent awards,
rights to receive shares of Company Common Stock on a deferred
basis, rights to purchase or receive Company Common Stock or
other rights that are linked to the value of Company Common
Stock (collectively, Company Stock-Based
Awards) issued or granted by the Company or any
Company Subsidiary to any current or former director, officer,
employee or consultant of the Company or any Company Subsidiary.
All outstanding shares of Company Common Stock are, and all
shares which may be issued pursuant to the Company Stock Options
will be, when issued in accordance with the terms thereof, duly
authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not
subject to or issued in violation of any purchase option, call
option, right of first refusal, preemptive right, subscription
right or any similar right under any provision of the DGCL, the
amended and restated certificate of incorporation of the
Company, as amended through the date of this Agreement (as so
amended, the Company Charter), the amended
and restated bylaws of the Company, as amended through the date
of this Agreement (as so amended, the Company
Bylaws) or any Contract to which the Company is a
party or otherwise bound. During the period from
February 28, 2005 to the date of this Agreement, there have
been no issuances, reservation for issuance or grants by the
Company or any Company Subsidiary of any shares of Company
Capital Stock or other voting securities or equity interests of
the Company or any Company Subsidiary (other than issuances or
grants of shares of Company Common Stock pursuant to the
exercise of Company Stock Options outstanding on such date as
required by their terms as in effect on the date of this
Agreement).
(c) There are not any bonds, debentures, notes or other
indebtedness of the Company or any Company Subsidiary having the
right to vote on any matters on which holders of capital stock
or other equity interests of the Company or any Company
Subsidiary may vote (Voting Company Debt).
(d) Except as set forth above in this Section 3.03, as
of the date of this Agreement, there are (i) no options,
warrants, calls, rights, convertible or exchangeable securities,
commitments, Contracts, arrangements or undertakings of any kind
to which the Company or any Company Subsidiary is a party or by
A-11
which any of them is bound obligating the Company or any Company
Subsidiary to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be issued,
delivered or sold, (A) shares of capital stock or other
voting securities or equity interests of, or any security
convertible or exercisable for or exchangeable into any capital
stock or other voting securities or equity interests of, the
Company or any Company Subsidiary or (B) any Voting Company
Debt and (ii) no other rights the value of which is in any
way based on or derived from, or that give any person the right
to receive any economic benefit or right similar to or derived
from the economic benefits and rights accruing to holders of,
capital stock or other voting securities or equity interests of
the Company or any Company Subsidiary. As of the date of this
Agreement, there are not any outstanding contractual obligations
of the Company or any Company Subsidiary to repurchase, redeem
or otherwise acquire any shares of capital stock of the Company
or any Company Subsidiary or any such security.
(e) Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary is a
party to any voting agreement with respect to the voting of any
such securities.
(f) As of the date of this Agreement, (i) the only
outstanding indebtedness for borrowed money (other than
indebtedness incurred in the ordinary course of business not in
excess, individually or in the aggregate, of $25,000,000) of the
Company and the Company Subsidiaries is $524,947,000 in
aggregate principal amount of loans under the Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 13, 2001, and
amended and restated as of July 2, 2002, as amended as of
November 19, 2003 (the Company Credit
Agreement), among the Company, the lending
institutions party thereto, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and
Lehman Brothers, Inc., as co-lead arrangers, Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as Administrative Agent, Lehman Commercial
Paper, Inc., as Syndication Agent and Citicorp USA, Inc., The
Bank of Nova Scotia and Credit Lyonnais New York Branch, as
Documentation Agents, and (ii) there are no guarantees by
the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries of indebtedness
of third parties for borrowed money.
Section 3.04. Authority;
Execution and Delivery; Enforceability. (a) The
Company has all requisite corporate power and authority to
execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby. Assuming the representation
made in Section 4.07 is correct, the execution and delivery
by the Company of this Agreement and the consummation by the
Company of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly
authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of the
Company and no other corporate proceedings on the part of the
Company are or will be necessary to authorize this Agreement or
to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, subject, in
the case of the Merger, to obtaining the Company Stockholder
Approval. The Company has duly executed and delivered this
Agreement, and this Agreement constitutes its legal, valid and
binding obligation, enforceable against it in accordance with
its terms, except as enforcement may be limited by applicable
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar
laws affecting creditors rights generally and by general
principles of equity (regardless of whether considered in a
proceeding at Law or in equity). The board of directors of the
Company (the Company Board), at a meeting,
duly called and held, duly and adopted (with all directors in
attendance voting in favor) resolutions (i) approving this
Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby, (ii) determining that the terms of the Merger, this
Agreement and the other transactions contemplated hereby are
fair to and in the best interests of the Companys
stockholders, (iii) declaring this Agreement and the Merger
advisable, (iv) directing that this Agreement be submitted
to a vote at a meeting of the Companys stockholders and
(v) recommending that the Companys stockholders adopt
this Agreement, which resolutions have not been subsequently
rescinded, modified or withdrawn in any way. Assuming the
representation made in Section 4.07 is correct, the
approval of this Agreement, the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby by the Company Board referred
to in this Section 3.04(a) constitutes approval of the
Merger for purposes of Section 203 of the DGCL and
represents the only action necessary to ensure that the
restrictions on business combinations (as such term
is defined therein) set forth in Section 203 of the DGCL
does not and will not apply to the execution or delivery of this
Agreement and the consummation of the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby. To the Companys
knowledge, no other state takeover statute or similar statute or
regulation applies or purports to apply to the Company with
respect to this Agreement, the Merger or any of the other
transactions contemplated hereby.
A-12
(b) Assuming the representation made in Section 4.07
is correct, the only vote or consent of holders of any class or
series of Company Capital Stock necessary to approve and adopt
this Agreement and the Merger is the adoption of this Agreement
by the holders of a majority of the outstanding Company Common
Stock (the Company Stockholder Approval). The
affirmative vote or consent of the holders of Company Capital
Stock, or any of them, is not necessary to consummate any of the
transactions contemplated hereby, other than the Merger.
Section 3.05. No
Conflicts; Consents. (a) The execution and delivery
by the Company of this Agreement do not, and the consummation of
the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby and
compliance with the terms hereof will not, conflict with, or
result in any violation or breach of or default (with or without
notice or lapse of time, or both) under, or give rise to a right
of, or result in, termination, cancelation or acceleration of
any obligation or to loss of a material benefit under, or result
in the creation of any Lien upon any of the properties or assets
of the Company or any Company Subsidiary under, any provision of
(i) the Company Charter, the Company Bylaws or the
comparable charter or organizational documents of any Company
Subsidiary, (ii) any contract, subcontract, lease,
sublease, conditional sales contract, purchase order, sales
order, license, indenture, note, bond, loan, instrument,
understanding, permit, concession, franchise, commitment or
other agreement, in each case in writing
(a Contract), to which the Company or
any Company Subsidiary is a party or by which any of their
respective assets is bound or (iii) subject to the filings
and other matters referred to in Section 3.05(b), any
judgment, order, ruling, award, assessment, writ, injunction,
decree, stipulation or determination, in each case whether
preliminary or final, of a Governmental Entity
(Judgment) or any statute, law (including
common law), ordinance, rule, regulation or order
(Law) applicable to the Company or any
Company Subsidiary or their respective properties or assets,
other than, in the case of clauses (ii) and
(iii) above, any such items that, individually or in the
aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) No consent, approval, license, permit, order or
authorization (Consent) of, or registration,
declaration or filing with, or notice to, or permit from, any
supranational, national, federal, state, provincial, local or
municipal (whether domestic or foreign) government or any court
of competent jurisdiction, tribunal, arbitrator, judicial body,
administrative or regulatory agency, authority, commission or
board or other governmental department, bureau, branch, agency,
authority or instrumentality or any non-governmental self
regulatory agency or other authority (a Governmental
Entity) is required to be obtained or made by or with
respect to the Company or any Company Subsidiary in connection
with the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement
or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby,
other than (i) compliance with and filings under
(A) the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act
of 1976, as amended (the HSR Act),
(B) Section 721 of the Defense Production Act, as
amended (Exon-Florio), and (C) the
requirements of any applicable competition, antitrust or similar
Law of any jurisdiction outside the United States, (ii) the
filing with the SEC of (A) a proxy statement relating to
the adoption of this Agreement by the stockholders of the
Company (the Proxy Statement) and
(B) such reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), as may be
required in connection with this Agreement, the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated hereby, (iii) the filing of
the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware and appropriate documents with the relevant
authorities of the other jurisdictions in which the Company or
any Company Subsidiary is qualified to do business,
(iv) such filings as may be required in connection with the
taxes described in Section 6.09, (v) any filings
required under the rules and regulations of the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc., (vi) any notice of the Merger required by
the terms of the license under the Swedish Act on War Equipment
granted to Bofors Defense AB, a limited liability company
incorporated under the laws of Sweden, and its subsidiaries
(collectively, Bofors), (vii) such other
items required by reason of the participation of Parent, Sub or
any of their affiliates (as opposed to any other third party) in
the transactions contemplated hereby (including any filings or
notices related to national security or foreign ownership
control or influence) and (viii) such other Consents,
registrations, declarations, filings, notices or permits, the
failure of which to obtain or make, individually or in the
aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
A-13
Section 3.06. SEC
Documents; Undisclosed Liabilities. (a) The Company
has filed or furnished, as applicable, all reports, schedules,
forms, statements and other documents required to be filed or
furnished, as applicable, by the Company with the SEC since
January 1, 2003 (the Company SEC
Documents).
(b) As of its respective date, each Company SEC Document
and the Draft 2004 10-K each complied in all material respects
with the requirements of the Exchange Act or the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), as
the case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
promulgated thereunder applicable to such Company SEC Document,
and, to the extent in effect and applicable, the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder
(SOX), and did not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading. The consolidated financial
statements of the Company included in each of the Company SEC
Documents and the Draft 2004 10-K (collectively, the
Company Financial Statements) comply as to
form in all material respects with applicable accounting
requirements and the published rules and regulations of the SEC
with respect thereto, have been prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) (except, in the case of unaudited
statements, as permitted by Form 10-Q of the SEC) applied
on a consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may
be indicated in the notes thereto) and fairly present in all
material respects the consolidated financial position of the
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries as of the dates
thereof and the consolidated results of their operations and
cash flows for the periods shown (subject, in the case of
unaudited statements (other than those contained in the Draft
2004 10-K), to normal year-end audit adjustments).
(c) Except to the extent accrued or reserved in the Company
Financial Statements, neither the Company nor any Company
Subsidiary has any liability or obligation of any nature
(whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise) that would
be required by GAAP to be reflected on a consolidated balance
sheet of the Company (including the notes thereto), except for
those arising in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, for taxes or that, individually or in the
aggregate, are not reasonably likely to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
(d) Each of the principal executive officer of the Company
and the principal financial officer of the Company has made all
certifications required by Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 under the
Exchange Act and Sections 302 and 906 of SOX with respect
to the Company SEC Documents. For purposes of this Agreement,
principal executive officer and principal
financial officer shall have the meanings given to such
terms in SOX. Neither the Company nor any of the Company
Subsidiaries has outstanding, or has arranged any outstanding,
extensions of credit to directors or executive
officers within the meaning of Section 402 of SOX.
(e) Neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries
is a party to, or has any commitment to become a party to, any
joint venture, off-balance sheet partnership or any similar
Contract or arrangement (including any Contract relating to any
transaction or relationship between or among the Company and any
of the Company Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any
unconsolidated affiliate, including any structured finance,
special purpose or limited purpose entity or person, on the
other hand or any off-balance sheet arrangements (as
defined in Item 303(a) of Regulation S-K of the SEC)),
where the result, purpose or effect of such Contract is to avoid
disclosure of any material transaction involving, or material
liabilities of, the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries
in the Companys or such Company Subsidiarys audited
financial statements or other Company SEC Documents.
(f) None of the Company Subsidiaries is, or has at any time
since January 1, 2003, been, subject to the reporting
requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange
Act.
(g) The Company maintains internal accounting controls that
provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are
executed in accordance with managements general or
specific authorization, (ii) transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of its financial statements and
to maintain accountability for its assets, (iii) access to
its assets is permitted only in accordance with managements
A-14
general or specific authorization and (iv) the recorded
accountability for its assets is compared with existing assets
at reasonable intervals.
(h) The Company has established and maintains
disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms
are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) and such disclosure controls and procedures are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the Company in the reports it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
SEC, including controls and procedures to ensure that such
information is accumulated and communicated to the
Companys management, including its principal executive
officer and its principal financial officer, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(i) Since the date of the filing of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, the Companys auditors and the
Company Board have not been advised of (i) any significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information or
(ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
(j) Since the date of the filing of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, there have been no material changes in
internal control over financial reporting that have materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect internal
controls over financial reporting.
(k) The Company intends to file its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, within
five business days of the date of this Agreement, and such
Annual Report as filed with the SEC will not contain any
material changes from the Draft 2004 10-K.
Section 3.07. Information
Supplied. None of the information supplied or to be
supplied by the Company for inclusion or incorporation by
reference in (a) the Proxy Statement will, at the date it
is first mailed to the Companys stockholders or at the
time of the Company Stockholders Meeting or at the time of
any amendment or supplement thereof, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they are made, not misleading or (b) the UK Parent Circular
will, at the date the UK Parent Circular is first mailed to
shareholders of UK Parent or (to the extent not previously
corrected by a supplement to the UK Parent Circular) at the time
of the UK Parent Shareholder Meeting contain any information
which is not in accordance with the facts or which omits
anything likely to affect the import of such information. The
Proxy Statement will comply as to form in all material respects
with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder, except that no representation is made by
the Company with respect to statements made or incorporated by
reference therein based on information supplied by Parent or Sub
in writing for inclusion or incorporation by reference therein.
Section 3.08. Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. From December 31,
2004 to the date of this Agreement, the Company has conducted
its business in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, and during such period there has not been:
|
|
|
(a) any Company Material Adverse Change; |
|
|
(b) any declaration, setting aside or payment of any
dividend or other distribution (whether in cash, stock or
property) with respect to any Company Capital Stock or any
repurchase or redemption for value by the Company of any Company
Capital Stock, other than the declaration of a cash dividend on
the Company Common Stock in the amount of $0.125 per share
payable on March 1, 2005 to holders of record of Company
Common Stock as of February 15, 2005; |
|
|
(c) any purchase, redemption or other acquisition of
(i) any shares of Company Capital Stock or other voting
securities or equity interests of the Company or any Company
Subsidiary, (ii) any Company Stock-Based Awards, options,
warrants, calls, rights, convertible or exchangeable securities, |
A-15
|
|
|
commitments, Contracts, arrangements or undertakings of any kind
to which the Company or any Company Subsidiary is a party or by
which any of them is bound, obligating the Company or any
Company Subsidiary to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be
issued, delivered or sold, shares of capital stock or other
voting securities or equity interests of, or any security
convertible or exercisable for or exchangeable into any capital
stock or other voting securities or equity interests of, the
Company or any Company Subsidiary or (iii) any other rights
the value of which is in any way based upon or derived from, or
that give any person the right to receive any economic benefit
or right similar to or derived from the economic benefits and
rights accruing to holders of, capital stock or other voting
securities or equity interests of the Company or any Company
Subsidiary; |
|
|
(d) any split, combination or reclassification of any
Company Capital Stock or any issuance, or the authorization of
any issuance, of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of
or in substitution for shares of Company Capital Stock; |
|
|
(e) (i) any granting by the Company or any Company
Subsidiary to any director, officer, employee or consultant, or
any former director, officer, employee or consultant, of the
Company or any Company Subsidiary of (A) any increase in
compensation, bonus, fringe or other benefits, except for normal
increases in cash compensation or granting of bonuses, incentive
compensation and fringe or other benefits, in each case, in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
(1) to officers and other employees or (2) as was
required under any Company Benefit Agreement or Company Benefit
Plan in effect as of December 31, 2004 in accordance with
its terms in effect on such date, or (B) any change of
control, severance or termination compensation or benefits or
increase therein to any current employee of the Company or any
Company Subsidiary, (ii) any entry by the Company or any
Company Subsidiary into, or any amendment to or termination of,
(A) any employment, deferred compensation, consulting,
severance, change of control, loan, termination or
indemnification agreement or (B) any other agreement the
benefits of which are contingent, or the terms of which are
materially altered, upon the occurrence of a transaction
involving the Company of a nature contemplated by this Agreement
with, or providing benefits to, any director, officer, employee
or consultant, or any former director, officer, employee or
consultant, of the Company or any Company Subsidiary (such items
set forth in clauses (A) and (B) of this
clause (ii) being referred to collectively as
Company Benefit Agreements), (iii) any
adoption of, entry into, any amendment to or any termination of,
any collective bargaining agreement or any Company Benefit Plan,
except as required to comply with applicable Law or any Company
Benefit Agreement or Company Benefit Plan in effect as of
December 31, 2004 in accordance with its terms in effect on
such date and except for the entry into of collective bargaining
agreements negotiated in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or (iv) any action taken to
fund or in any other way secure the payment, or to accelerate
the vesting or payment, of compensation or benefits under any
Company Benefit Plan (or any grant or award thereunder) or
Company Benefit Agreement; |
|
|
(f) any change in accounting methods, principles or
practices by the Company or any Company Subsidiary materially
affecting the consolidated assets, liabilities or results of
operations of the Company, except insofar as may have been
required by a change in GAAP; |
|
|
(g) any (i) elections with respect to taxes by the
Company or any Company Subsidiary, (ii) settlement or
compromise by the Company or any Company Subsidiary of any tax
liability or refund, (iii) filing by the Company of an
amended tax return or (iv) other action by the Company that
is reasonably likely to have the effect of materially increasing
the tax liability or materially decreasing a tax asset of the
Company or any Company Subsidiary; |
|
|
(h) any revaluation by the Company or any Company
Subsidiary of any assets that are material to the Company and
the Company Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; |
|
|
(i) any sale, lease, license or other disposition of, or
subjecting to any Lien, any material assets of the Company or
any Company Subsidiary (including Intellectual Property Rights),
except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice; |
A-16
|
|
|
(j) any entry by the Company or any Company Subsidiary into
any Contract with any affiliate of the Company (any such
Contract, a Contract with a Related
Person); or |
|
|
(k) any authorization of, or commitment or agreement to
take, any of the actions described in clauses (b) through
(j). |
Section 3.09. Taxes.
(a) Each of the Company, each Company Subsidiary and any
affiliated, consolidated, combined, unitary or aggregate group
of which the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries is a
member (an Affiliated Group) has timely
filed, or has caused to be timely filed on its behalf, all
material tax returns required to be filed by it, and all such
tax returns are true, complete and accurate in all material
respects. All taxes shown to be due on such tax returns, and all
material taxes otherwise owed, have been timely paid (other than
payments being contested in good faith by appropriate
proceedings).
(b) The most recent financial statements contained in the
Filed Company SEC Documents reflect an adequate reserve for all
taxes payable by the Company, the Company Subsidiaries and any
Affiliated Group (in addition to any reserve for deferred taxes
to reflect timing differences between book and tax items) for
all taxable periods and portions thereof through the date of
such financial statements. To the knowledge of the Company, no
deficiency, audit, examination, refund litigation, proposed
adjustment or matter in controversy with respect to any material
taxes has been proposed, asserted or assessed against the
Company, any Company Subsidiary or any Affiliated Group. There
is no agreement or other document extending, or having the
effect of extending, the period of assessment or collection of
any taxes and no power of attorney with respect to any material
taxes has been executed or filed with any taxing authority by or
on behalf of the Company, any Company Subsidiary or any
Affiliated Group.
(c) The tax returns of the Company, each Company Subsidiary
and each Affiliated Group have been examined by and settled with
the United States Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS) or other applicable taxing authority or
have closed by virtue of the expiration of the relevant statute
of limitations, for all years through 1998. All assessments for
taxes due with respect to such completed and settled
examinations or any concluded litigation have been fully paid.
(d) Neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries
has been a member of any Affiliated Group that includes any
person other than the Company and the Company Subsidiaries for
purposes of filing tax returns or paying taxes at any time
within the last ten years. None of the Company, any of the
Company Subsidiaries and any Affiliated Group is bound by any
agreement with respect to taxes other than agreements between
any of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries.
(e) Neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries
will be required to include in a taxable period ending after the
Effective Time taxable income attributable to income that
accrued (for purposes of the financial statements of the Company
included in the Filed Company SEC Documents) in a prior taxable
period but was not recognized for tax purposes in any prior
taxable period as a result of the installment method of
accounting, the completed contract method of accounting, the
long-term contract method of accounting, the cash method of
accounting or Section 481 of the Code or comparable
provisions of material federal, state, local, provincial or
municipal (whether domestic or foreign) tax Law, or for any
other reason.
(f) There are no Liens for taxes (other than for current
taxes not yet due and payable) on the assets of the Company or
any Company Subsidiary.
(g) None of the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries
has constituted either a distributing corporation or
a controlled corporation (in each case within the
meaning of Section 355(a)(1)(A) of the Code) in a
distribution of stock qualifying for tax-free treatment under
Section 355 of the Code (i) in the two years prior to
the date of this Agreement or (ii) in a distribution which
could otherwise constitute part of a plan or
series of related transactions (within the meaning
of Section 355(e) of the Code) in conjunction with the
Merger.
(h) Neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries
has been, at any time during the period specified in
Section 897(c)(1)(A) of the Code, a United States real
property holding corporation within the meaning of
Section 897(c)(2) of the Code.
A-17
(i) There has been no change in ownership of
the Company within the meaning of Section 382(g) of the
Code within the two-year period preceding the Effective Time.
(j) For purposes of this Agreement:
|
|
|
(i) tax or
taxes means (A) all
supranational, national, federal, state, provincial, local or
municipal (whether domestic or foreign) taxes, assessments,
duties, fees, levies or similar charges of any kind, including
all sales, payroll, employment and other withholding taxes, and
including all obligations under any tax sharing agreement, tax
indemnity obligation or similar written or unwritten agreement,
arrangement or practice, and including all interest, penalties
and additions imposed with respect to such amounts, (B) all
liability for the payment of any amounts of the type described
in the foregoing clause (A) as a result of being a
member of an affiliated, consolidated, combined, unitary or
aggregate group and (C) all liability for the payment of
any amounts as a result of being party to any tax sharing
agreement or as a result of any express or implied obligation to
indemnify any other person with respect to the payment of any
amounts of the type described in the foregoing
clause (A) or (B); and |
|
|
(ii) tax return means all tax
returns, declarations, statements, reports, schedules, forms and
information returns and any amended tax return relating to taxes. |
Section 3.10. Absence
of Changes in Benefit Plans; Labor Relations.
(a) Since December 31, 2004, the Company and the
Company Subsidiaries have not adopted, amended in any material
respect or terminated any collective bargaining agreement or any
material employment, bonus, pension, profit sharing, deferred
compensation, incentive compensation, stock ownership, stock
purchase, stock option or other equity-based compensation,
performance, retirement, thrift, savings, paid time off,
perquisite, fringe benefit, vacation, severance, change of
control, medical, welfare benefit or other similar plan,
program, policy, arrangement or understanding (whether or not
legally binding) sponsored, maintained, contributed to or
required to be maintained or contributed to by the Company or
any Company Subsidiary or any other person or entity that,
together with the Company, is treated as a single employer under
Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code
(each, a Commonly Controlled Entity), in each
case providing benefits to any director, officer, employee or
consultant, or any former director, officer, employee or
consultant, in each case, whether or not located in the United
States, of the Company or any Company Subsidiary (collectively,
the Company Benefit Plans). Since
December 31, 2004, there has not been any material change
in any actuarial or other assumption used to calculate funding
obligations with respect to any Company Pension Plan, or any
material change in the manner in which contributions to any
Company Pension Plan are made or the basis on which such
contributions are determined, except to the extent permitted by
the Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004.
(b) No union has attempted to organize or otherwise make
any claim to represent the employees or the Company or any
Company Subsidiary and no such action is pending or threatened
in writing. From January 1, 2003 to the date of this
Agreement, neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has
experienced any labor disputes or work stoppages, slowdowns or
lockouts due to labor disagreements, except any dispute,
stoppage, slowdown or lockout that, individually or in the
aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. No unfair labor practice has been committed by
the Company or any Company Subsidiary, and there is no unfair
labor practice charge or complaint against the Company or any
Company Subsidiary pending or threatened in writing before the
National Labor Relations Board or any similar Federal, state,
local or foreign Governmental Entity, except any practice,
charge or complaint that, individually or in the aggregate, is
not reasonably likely to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
No grievance or arbitration proceeding arising out of any
collective bargaining agreement is pending or threatened in
writing against the Company or any Company Subsidiary, except
any grievance or proceeding that, individually or in the
aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
Section 3.11. ERISA
Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments. (a) Each
Company Benefit Plan has been administered in all material
respects in accordance with its terms. The Company, the Company
Subsidiaries and the Company Benefit Plans are all in compliance
in all material respects with the applicable provisions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA),
A-18
the Code and all other applicable Laws, including Laws of
foreign jurisdictions, and the terms of all collective
bargaining agreements. No Company Benefit Plan provides benefits
primarily to persons who are or were employed, or provide or
provided services, outside the United States.
(b) Each Company Benefit Plan that is an employee
pension benefit plan (as defined in Section 3(2) of
ERISA) (each, a Company Pension Plan)
intended to be tax-qualified has received favorable
determination letters to the effect that such Company Pension
Plan is qualified and exempt from Federal income taxes under
Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Code, no such
determination letter has been revoked (nor, to the knowledge of
the Company, has revocation been threatened in writing) and no
event has occurred since the date of the most recent
determination letter or application therefor relating to such
Company Pension Plan (including any amendment thereto) that is
reasonably likely to adversely affect the qualification of such
Company Pension Plan or materially increase the costs relating
thereto or require security under Section 307 of ERISA.
Each Company Pension Plan has complied since its inception, or
has been timely amended to comply, with the requirements of the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. All
Company Benefit Plans required or permitted to have been
approved by any non-U.S. Governmental Entity have been so
approved, no such approval has been revoked (nor, to the
knowledge of the Company, has revocation been threatened in
writing) and no event has occurred since the date of the most
recent approval or application therefor relating to any such
Company Benefit Plan that is reasonably likely to materially
affect any such approval relating thereto or materially increase
the costs relating thereto.
(c) Neither the Company nor any Commonly Controlled Entity
has incurred, or reasonably expects to incur, any liability
under Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code,
except for premiums payable to the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation in the ordinary course of business. No Company
Pension Plan had, as of its most recent annual valuation date,
any unfunded benefit liabilities (as defined in
Section 4001(a)(18) of ERISA), and there has been no
material adverse change in the financial condition of such
Company Pension Plan since such valuation date. No Company
Pension Plan has an accumulated funding deficiency
(as defined in Section 412 of the Code), whether or not
waived. During the prior six years, no Company Pension Plan or
its related trust has been terminated and there has not been any
other reportable event (as defined in
Section 4043 of ERISA) for which the 30-day reporting
requirement has not been waived with respect to any Company
Pension Plan. During the prior six years, neither the Company
nor any Commonly Controlled Entity incurred any liability in
respect of a withdrawal, complete
withdrawal or partial withdrawal from any
Company Benefit Plan that is a multiemployer plan
(as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA) or a multiple
employer plan (within the meaning of Sections 4063
and 4064 of ERISA).
(d) None of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries has
received notice of, and to the knowledge of the Company, there
are no investigations by any Governmental Entity with respect
to, termination proceedings or other claims (except claims for
benefits payable in the normal operation of the Company Benefit
Plans), suits, proceedings or other actions against or involving
any Company Benefit Plan or asserting any rights or claims to
benefits under any Company Benefit Plan that, if adversely
determined, individually or in the aggregate, is reasonably
likely to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, and, to the
knowledge of the Company, there are not any facts that,
individually or in the aggregate, is reasonably likely to result
in a Company Material Adverse Effect in the event of any such
investigation, claim, suit, proceeding or other action.
(e) With respect to each Company Benefit Plan, there has
not occurred any prohibited transaction (within the
meaning of Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the
Code) that is reasonably likely to subject the Company or any
Company Subsidiary or any of their respective employees, or any
trustee, administrator or other fiduciary of any trust created
under any Company Benefit Plan, to the tax or penalty on
prohibited transactions imposed by Section 4975 of the Code
or the sanctions imposed under Title I of ERISA or to any
liability for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA or any other
applicable Law, except taxes or penalties that, individually or
in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
A-19
(f) Each Company Benefit Plan that is an employee welfare
benefit plan may be amended or terminated (including with
respect to benefits provided to retirees and other former
employees) without material liability (other than liability for
benefits then payable under such plan without regard to such
amendment or termination) to the Company or any Company
Subsidiary at any time after the Effective Time. Neither the
Company nor any Company Subsidiary has any material obligations
for retiree health or life insurance benefits under any Company
Benefit Plan (other than for continuation coverage required
under Section 4980B(f) of the Code).
(g) None of the execution and delivery of this Agreement,
the obtaining of the Company Stockholder Approval or the
consummation of the Merger or any other transaction contemplated
hereby alone or in combination with any other event will
(i) entitle any director, officer, employee or consultant,
or any former director, officer, employee or consultant, of the
Company or any Company Subsidiary to change of control,
severance or termination compensation or benefits,
(ii) accelerate the time of payment or vesting, or trigger
any payment or funding (through a grantor trust or otherwise)
of, compensation or benefits under, increase the amount payable
or trigger any other material obligation pursuant to, any
Company Benefit Plan (or any grant or award thereunder) or
Company Benefit Agreement or (iii) result in any breach or
violation of, or a default under, any Company Benefit Plan (or
any grant or award thereunder) or Company Benefit Agreement. No
amount or benefit that could be received by any named executive
officer of the Company (as defined for purposes of
Section 16 of the Exchange Act) in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement (alone or in
combination with any other event) would be characterized as an
excess parachute payment (as defined in
Section 280G(b)(1) of the Code), and no such person is
entitled to any additional payment or benefit in the event the
excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code is imposed on
such person.
Section 3.12. Proceedings.
(a) Other than with respect to proceedings under seal of
which the Company has no knowledge, there is no claim, suit,
proceeding or other action pending or, to the knowledge of the
Company, threatened in writing against or affecting the Company
or any Company Subsidiary or any of their respective assets, nor
is there any Judgment outstanding against, or material notice of
an actual or potential violation, order of forfeiture or
complaint by any Governmental Entity involving, the Company or
any Company Subsidiary, in each case, that, individually or in
the aggregate, is reasonably likely to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) There is no material audit, inquiry or investigation
involving the Company or any Company Subsidiary by a
Governmental Entity pending, or to the knowledge of the Company,
threatened in writing.
Section 3.13. Compliance
with Applicable Laws. (a) The Company and the
Company Subsidiaries are in compliance with all applicable Laws
and Judgments, except any failure to be in compliance that,
individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to
have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor
any Company Subsidiary has received any written communication
(excluding for purposes of this sentence any written
communication by electronic mail) during the past three years
from a Governmental Entity that alleges that the Company or a
Company Subsidiary is not, or may not be, in compliance with, or
has, or may have, liability under, any applicable Law or
Judgment, except any failure to be in compliance or liability,
that, individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely
to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Each of the Company
and the Company Subsidiaries has in effect all approvals,
authorizations, certificates, filings, franchises, licenses,
notices, permits and rights of or with all Governmental Entities
(collectively, Permits), necessary for it to
own, lease or operate its assets and to carry on its business as
presently conducted, except any failure to have in effect any
Permit that, individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably
likely to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. There has
occurred no default under, or violation of, any Permit, and the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby will not
cause the revocation or cancelation of any Permit, except any
default, violation, revocation or cancelation that, individually
or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
(b) The Company and the Company Subsidiaries are in
compliance with all statutory and regulatory requirements under
the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778), the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 C.F.R.
§ 120 et seq.), the Export Administration Regulations
(15 C.F.R. § 730 et seq.)
A-20
and associated executive orders, and the Laws implemented by the
Office of Foreign Assets Controls, United States Department of
the Treasury (collectively, the Export Control
Laws), except any failure to be in compliance that,
individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to
have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor
any Company Subsidiary has received any written communication
during the past 12 months that alleges that the Company or
a Company Subsidiary is not, or may not be, in compliance with,
or has, or may have, any liability under, the Export Control
Laws, except any failure to be in compliance or liability that,
individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to
have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(c) The Company and the Company Subsidiaries are in
compliance in all material respects with all legal requirements
under (i) the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (15 U.S.C.
§§ 78dd-1, et seq) and the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development Convention Against Bribery
of Foreign Public Officials in International Business
Transactions and legislation implementing such Convention and
(ii) international anti-bribery conventions (other than the
convention described in clause (i)) and local
anti-corruption and bribery Laws, in each case, in jurisdictions
in which the Company and the Company Subsidiaries are operating
(collectively, the Anti-Bribery Laws), except
with respect to clause (ii) any failure to be in compliance
that, individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely
to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company
nor any of the Company Subsidiaries has received any written
communication that alleges that the Company, a Company
Subsidiary or any agent thereof is, or may be, in violation of,
or has, or may have, any material liability under, the
Anti-Bribery Laws, except any written communication received
more than 24 months prior to the date of this Agreement
that did not result in an inquiry or investigation that is
currently pending.
Section 3.14. Compliance
with Environmental Laws. (a) Except as,
individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to
have a Company Material Adverse Effect:
|
|
|
(i) the Company and the Company Subsidiaries are in
compliance with all Environmental Laws, and neither the Company
nor any of the Company Subsidiaries has received any written
notice that alleges that the Company or any of the Company
Subsidiaries is, or may be, in violation of, or has, or may
have, any liability under, any Environmental Law; |
|
|
(ii) the Company and the Company Subsidiaries have
obtained, maintained and complied with all Permits necessary
under any Environmental Law for them to own, lease or operate
their respective assets as currently held and to carry on their
respective businesses as presently conducted
(Environmental Permits); |
|
|
(iii) there are no Environmental Claims pending or, to the
knowledge of the Company, threatened in writing, against the
Company or any Company Subsidiary; and |
|
|
(iv) there have been no Releases of any Hazardous Material
that is reasonably likely to form the basis of any Environmental
Claim against the Company or any Company Subsidiary. |
(b) As used in this Agreement:
|
|
|
Environmental Claim means any and all
administrative, regulatory or judicial claims, suits,
proceedings, investigations or other actions, Judgments, written
demands, written directives, Liens or written notices of
noncompliance or violation, in any such case, by or from any
person alleging liability of whatever kind or nature (including
liability or responsibility for the costs of investigations,
remediation or governmental response, natural resources damages,
property damages, personal injuries, penalties, contribution,
indemnification or injunctive relief) arising out of, based on
or resulting from (i) the presence or Release of, or
exposure of persons to, any Hazardous Materials, (ii) the
failure to comply with any Environmental Law or
(iii) liabilities or obligations arising under any
Environmental Law; |
|
|
Environmental Laws means all
applicable national, federal, state, local, provincial and
municipal (whether domestic or foreign) Laws, Judgments or
Permits issued, promulgated or entered into by or with any
Governmental Entity, relating to Release, treatment, storage or
other disposal of or exposure of persons to Hazardous Materials
or protection of the environment; |
A-21
|
|
|
Hazardous Materials means any
petroleum or petroleum products, radioactive materials or
wastes, asbestos in any form and polychlorinated biphenyls, and
any other chemical, material or substance designated a
hazardous substance, hazardous waste,
hazardous material, contaminant,
pollutant or toxic substance under any
applicable Environmental Law ; and |
|
|
Release means any release, spill,
emission, leaking, dumping, injection, pouring, deposit,
disposal, discharge, dispersal, leaching or migration into or
through the environment (including ambient air, surface water,
groundwater, land surface or subsurface strata) or within any
building, structure, facility or fixture. |
Section 3.15. Contracts.
(a) Except for Contracts filed in unredacted form as
exhibits to the Filed Company SEC Documents and Contracts
entered into in the ordinary course of business, there are no
Contracts that are material to the business, properties, assets,
financial condition, results of operations of the Company and
the Company Subsidiaries, taken as a whole (any such Contract, a
Material Company Contract). To the knowledge
of the Company, neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary
is in default or violation of (and no event has occurred which
with notice or the lapse of time or both would constitute a
default or violation by the Company or any Company Subsidiary
of) any material term, condition or provision (in each case,
whether explicit or incorporated by reference) of any
indebtedness, guarantee, Government Contract, Government
Subcontract or other Contract to which the Company or any
Company Subsidiary is a party or by which any of their
respective assets is bound, which default or violation,
individually or in the aggregate, is reasonably likely to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect.
(b) To the knowledge of the Chief Financial Officer and the
General Counsel of the Company (after reasonable inquiry), there
are no Contracts to which the Company or any Company Subsidiary
is a party that contain a covenant restricting the ability of
the Company or any Company Subsidiary (or which, following the
consummation of the Merger, could restrict the ability of Parent
or any of its affiliates, including the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries) to compete or engage in any line of business, or
to develop, market or distribute any products or services, in
each case, in any geographic territory.
(c) With respect to each Contract between the Company or
any Company Subsidiary, on the one hand, and any Governmental
Entity, on the other hand, for which (i) performance has
not been or was not completed or (ii) final payment has not
been or was not received, in either case, prior to the date that
is three years prior to the date of this Agreement, and each
outstanding bid, quotation or proposal by the Company or any
Company Subsidiary (each, a Bid) that if
accepted or awarded could lead to a Contract between the Company
or any Company Subsidiary, on the one hand, and any Governmental
Entity, on the other hand, including any facilities Contract for
the use of government-owned facilities (each such Contract or
Bid, a Company Government Contract) and each
Contract between the Company or any Company Subsidiary, on the
one hand, and any prime contractor or upper-tier subcontractor,
on the other hand, relating to a Contract between such person
and any Governmental Entity for which (i) performance has
not been or was not completed or (ii) final payment has not
been or was not received, in either case, prior to the date that
is three years prior to the date of this Agreement, and each
outstanding Bid that if accepted or awarded could lead to a
Contract between the Company or a Company Subsidiary, on the one
hand, and a prime contractor or upper-tier subcontractor, on the
other hand, relating to a Contract between such person and any
Governmental Entity (each such Contract or Bid, a
Company Government Subcontract):
|
|
|
(i) each such Company Government Contract or Company
Government Subcontract was, to the knowledge of the Company,
legally awarded, is binding on the parties thereto, and is in
full force and effect, except any failure to be legally awarded
or in full force and effect that, individually or in the
aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect; provided that for purposes of this
clause (i), the terms Company Government Contract and
Company Government Subcontract shall not include any Bids; |
|
|
(ii) no reasonable basis exists to give rise to (A) a
material claim for fraud (as such concept is defined under the
state or federal Laws of the United States) in connection with
any Company Government Contract or Company Government
Subcontract or under the United States False Claims |
A-22
|
|
|
Act or the United States Procurement Integrity Act or (B) a
claim under the United States Truth in Negotiations Act where
the amount in dispute is in excess of $10,000,000; |
|
|
(iii) neither the United States government nor any prime
contractor, subcontractor or other person or entity has notified
the Company or any Company Subsidiary, in writing, that the
Company or any Company Subsidiary has, or may have, breached or
violated in any material respect any Law, certification,
representation, clause, provision or requirement pertaining to
such Company Government Contract or Company Government
Subcontract, and all facts set forth or acknowledged by any
representations, claims or certifications submitted by or on
behalf of the Company or any Company Subsidiary in connection
with such Company Government Contract or Company Government
Subcontract were current, accurate and complete in all material
respects on the date of submission; |
|
|
(iv) neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has
received any notice of termination for convenience, notice of
termination for default, cure notice or show cause notice (or,
in the case of Contracts governed by Laws other than the state
or federal Laws of the United States, the functional equivalents
thereof, if any) pertaining to such Company Government Contract
or Company Government Subcontract, and the Company is not aware
of any basis for any such notice, except any notice that,
individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to
have a Company Material Adverse Effect, provided that
this clause (iv) shall not apply to any notice received
more than 12 months prior to the date of this Agreement,
which notice related to a program that is no longer ongoing as
of the date of this Agreement; |
|
|
(v) no cost in excess of $1,000,000 incurred by the Company
or any Company Subsidiary pertaining to such Company Government
Contract or Company Government Subcontract has been questioned
or challenged, is the subject of any audit or, to the knowledge
of the Company, investigation or has been disallowed by any
government or governmental agency, except any investigation,
audit or disallowance (or, in the case of Contracts governed by
Laws other than the state or federal Laws of the United States,
the functional equivalents thereof, if any) that, individually
or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect; |
|
|
(vi) no payment in excess of $1,000,000 due to the Company
or any Company Subsidiary pertaining to such Company Government
Contract or Company Government Subcontract has been withheld or
set off, and the Company and the Company Subsidiaries are
entitled to all progress or other payments received to date with
respect thereto, except any payment or claim that, individually
or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect; and |
|
|
(vii) the Company and the Company Subsidiaries have
complied in all material respects with all requirements of such
Company Government Contract or Company Government Subcontract
and any Law relating to the safeguarding of, and access to,
classified information (or, in the case of Contracts governed by
Laws other than the state or federal Laws of the United States,
the functional equivalent thereof, if any). |
(d) Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary, nor any
of the respective directors, officers, employees, consultants or
agents of the Company or any Company Subsidiary, is, or within
the past three years has been, to the knowledge of the Company
(i) under any material administrative, civil or criminal
investigation, audit, indictment or information by any
Governmental Entity, (ii) the subject of any material audit
or investigation by the Company or any Company Subsidiary, in
each case, with respect to any alleged violation of Law or
Contract arising under or relating to any Company Government
Contract or Company Government Subcontract or
(iii) debarred or suspended, or proposed for debarment or
suspension, or received notice of actual or proposed debarment
or suspension (or for purposes of this clause (iii), in the
case of Contracts governed by Laws other than the state or
federal Laws of the United States, the functional equivalents
thereof, if any), from participation in the award of any
Contract with any Governmental Entity. There exist no facts or
circumstances that, to the knowledge of the Company, would
warrant the institution of suspension or debarment proceedings
or a finding of nonresponsibility or ineligibility with respect
to the Company, any Company Subsidiary or any of their
respective directors, officers or managers, in any such case,
for purposes of doing business with any Governmental Entity.
A-23
(e) Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has
received written notice of any (i) outstanding material
claims (including claims relating to bid or award protest
proceedings (or, in the case of Contracts governed by Laws other
than the state or federal Laws of the United States, the
functional equivalents thereof, if any)) against the Company or
any Company Subsidiary, either by any Governmental Entity or by
any prime contractor, subcontractor, vendor or other person,
arising under or relating to any Company Government Contract or
Company Government Subcontract, or (ii) outstanding
material claims or requests for equitable adjustment (or, in the
case of Contracts governed by Laws other than the state or
federal Laws of the United States, the functional equivalent
thereof, if any) or disputes (including claims, requests and
formal disputes relating to bid or award protest proceedings)
between the Company or any Company Subsidiary, on the one hand,
and the United States government, on the other hand, under the
United States Contract Disputes Act, as amended, or any other
Law or between the Company or any Company Subsidiary, on the one
hand, and any prime contractor, subcontractor, vendor or other
person, on the other hand, arising under or relating to any
Company Government Contract or Company Government Subcontract,
except, in each case, for any claim, request or dispute where
the amount in dispute is not in excess of $5,000,000. To the
knowledge of the Company, neither the Company nor any Company
Subsidiary has received any written adverse or negative past
performance evaluations or ratings in connection with any
Company Government Contract, Company Government Subcontract or
other Contract with a Governmental Entity within the past three
years, except any evaluation or rating that, individually or in
the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any Company
Subsidiary has (i) any interest in any pending or potential
claim against any Governmental Entity or (ii) any interest
in any pending claim against any prime contractor,
subcontractor, vendor or other person arising under or relating
to any Company Government Contract or Company Government
Subcontract, except for any claim in which the amount involved
is not in excess of $5,000,000.
(f) The Company is not aware of any facts that are
reasonably likely to give rise to the revocation of any security
clearance of the Company, any Company Subsidiary or any employee
of the Company or any Company Subsidiary, except any revocation
that, individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely
to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.16. Customers
and Suppliers. Since December 31, 2004, (a) no
customer or supplier of the Company or any Company Subsidiary
has canceled or otherwise terminated its relationship with the
Company or any Company Subsidiary and (b) to the knowledge
of the Company, no customer or supplier of the Company or any
Company Subsidiary has provided notice to the Company or any
Company Subsidiary of its intent either to terminate its
relationship with the Company or any Company Subsidiary or to
cancel any material Contract with the Company or any Company
Subsidiary, except, in each case, any cancelation or termination
that, individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely
to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.17. Title
to Properties. The Company and the Company Subsidiaries
have good and marketable title to, or valid leasehold interests
in, all their respective material assets, except assets that are
no longer used or useful in the conduct of their respective
businesses or as have been disposed of in the ordinary course of
business and except any defect in title, easement, restrictive
covenant, similar encumbrance or impediment, or Lien that,
individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to
have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Each of the Company and each of the Company Subsidiaries has
complied with the terms of each lease, sublease, license and
other Contract relating to real property (each, a
Company Lease) to which it is a party, except
any failure to comply that, individually or in the aggregate, is
not reasonably likely to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.18. Intellectual
Property. To the knowledge of the Company, the Company
and the Company Subsidiaries own, or are validly licensed or
otherwise have the right to use, all (a) patents, patent
rights, patent applications and patent disclosures,
(b) trademarks, trademark rights, trade names, trade name
rights, service marks, service mark rights, logos, corporate
names, Internet domain names together with all goodwill
associated with each of the foregoing, (c) copyrights and
copyrightable works,
A-24
(d) computer software (including source code, object code,
data, databases and documentation), (e) inventions, trade
secrets, mask work, confidential information, know-how (whether
or not patentable and whether or not reduced to practice) and
(f) other proprietary information and intellectual property
(collectively, Intellectual Property Rights)
necessary to conduct their business as presently conducted, in
each case, free and clear of all Liens, except any failure or
Lien that, individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably
likely to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. To the
knowledge of the Company, no claims are pending or threatened in
writing that the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries is
infringing on or misappropriating the rights of any person with
regard to any Intellectual Property Right, except any claim
that, individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely
to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of
the Company, no person is infringing the rights of the Company
or any of the Company Subsidiaries with respect to any
Intellectual Property Right, except any infringement that,
individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to
have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.19. Brokers;
Schedule of Fees and Expenses. No broker, investment
banker, financial advisor or other person, other than
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Lehman Brothers, Inc., the
fees and expenses of which will be paid by the Company, is
entitled to any brokers, finders, financial
advisors or other similar fee or commission in connection
with the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of the
Company.
Section 3.20. Opinions
of Financial Advisors. The Company has received the
opinions of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Lehman
Brothers, Inc., in customary form, each of which is to the
effect that, as of such date, the consideration to be received
in the Merger by the holders of Company Common Stock is fair
from a financial point of view, a signed copy of each of which
will be delivered to Parent by the Company promptly after
receipt by the Company.
ARTICLE IV
Representations and Warranties of Parent and Sub
Parent and Sub, jointly and severally, represent and warrant to
the Company that:
Section 4.01. Organization,
Standing and Power. Each of Parent and Sub is duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws
of the jurisdiction in which it is organized and has full
corporate power and authority to conduct its businesses as
presently conducted.
Section 4.02. Sub.
(a) Since the date of its incorporation, Sub has not
carried on any business or conducted any operations other than
the execution of this Agreement, the performance of its
obligations hereunder and matters ancillary thereto.
(b) The authorized capital stock of Sub consists of
1,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, all of which have been validly issued, are fully paid and
nonassessable and are owned by Parent free and clear of any Lien.
Section 4.03. Authority;
Execution and Delivery; Enforceability. Each of Parent
and Sub has all requisite corporate power and authority to
execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby, subject to the approval of the
resolutions set forth or summarized, as the case may be, in the
UK Parent Circular, on a poll by the holders of not less than a
majority of ordinary shares of BAE Systems plc, a public limited
company incorporated in England and Wales (UK
Parent), present in person or by proxy who are
entitled to vote at the UK Parent Shareholder Meeting to approve
the Merger (the UK Parent Shareholder
Approval). The execution and delivery by each of
Parent and Sub of this Agreement and the consummation by it of
the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized
by all necessary corporate action on the part of Parent and Sub
and no other corporate proceedings on the part of Parent or Sub
are or will be necessary to authorize this Agreement or to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, subject to
obtaining the UK Parent Shareholder Approval, and subject to the
requirement that Parent, as sole stockholder of Sub, adopt this
Agreement. Each of Parent and Sub has duly executed and
delivered this Agreement, and this Agreement constitutes its
legal, valid and binding obligation, enforceable against it in
accordance with its terms, except as
A-25
enforcement may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium or similar laws affecting
creditors rights generally and by general principles of
equity (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding at Law
or in equity).
Section 4.04. No
Conflicts; Consents. (a) The execution and delivery
by each of Parent and Sub of this Agreement, and the
consummation of the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby and compliance with the terms hereof will
not, conflict with, or result in any violation or breach of or
default (with or without notice or lapse of time, or both)
under, or give rise to a right of, or result in, termination,
cancelation or acceleration of any obligation or to loss of a
material benefit under, or result in the creation of any Lien
upon any of the properties or assets of Parent or any of its
subsidiaries under, any provision of (i) the charter or
organizational documents of Parent or any of its subsidiaries,
(ii) subject to obtaining the UK Parent Shareholder
Approval, any Contract to which Parent or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or by which any of their respective
assets is bound or (iii) subject to the filings and other
matters referred to in Section 4.04(b) and subject to
obtaining the UK Parent Shareholder Approval, any Judgment or
Law applicable to Parent or any of its subsidiaries or their
respective properties or assets, other than, in the case of
clauses (ii) and (iii) above, any such items that,
individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely to
have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
(b) No Consent of, or registration, declaration or filing
with, or notice to, or permit from, any Governmental Entity is
required to be obtained or made by or with respect to Parent or
Sub in connection with the execution, delivery and performance
of this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby, other than (i) compliance with and
filings under (A) the HSR Act, (B) Exon-Florio and
(C) the requirements of any applicable competition,
antitrust or similar Law of any jurisdiction outside the United
States, (ii) compliance with any applicable requirements of
the Exchange Act in connection with this Agreement, the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated hereby, (iii) the
filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State
of the State of Delaware, (iv) such filings as may be
required in connection with the taxes described in
Section 6.09, (v) compliance with any applicable
requirements of the U.K. Listing Authority (the
UKLA), (vi) such other items required by
reason of the participation of the Company (as opposed to any
other third party) in the transactions contemplated hereby and
(vii) such other Consents, registrations, declarations,
filings, notices or permits, the failure of which to obtain or
make, individually or in the aggregate, is not reasonably likely
to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.05. Information
Supplied. None of the information supplied or to be
supplied by Parent or Sub for inclusion or incorporation by
reference in (a) the Proxy Statement will, at the date it
is first mailed to the Companys stockholders or at the
time of the Company Stockholders Meeting or at the time of
any amendment or supplement thereof, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they are made, not misleading or (b) the UK Parent Circular
will, at the date the UK Parent Circular is first mailed to
shareholders of UK Parent or (to the extent not previously
corrected by a supplement to the UK Parent Circular) at the time
of the UK Parent Shareholder Meeting contain any information
which is not in accordance with the facts or which omits
anything likely to affect the import of such information.
Section 4.06. Brokers.
No broker, investment banker, financial advisor or other person,
other than Goldman Sachs International, Gleacher Shacklock LLP
and CSP Associates, the fees and expenses of which will be paid
by Parent, is entitled to any brokers, finders,
financial advisors or other similar fee or commission in
connection with the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby based upon arrangements made by or on behalf
of Parent.
Section 4.07. Section 203
of the DGCL. None of Parent, Sub or any of their
affiliates or associates is, or has been
within the last three years, an interested
stockholder of the Company as those terms are defined in
Section 203 of the DGCL.
Section 4.08. Financial
Capability. At the Effective Time, Parent will have
sufficient cash to provide for payment of the Merger
Consideration.
A-26
ARTICLE V
Covenants Relating to Conduct of Business
Section 5.01. Conduct
of Business. (a) Conduct of Business by the
Company. Except for matters set forth in the Company
Disclosure Letter or otherwise expressly permitted or expressly
contemplated by this Agreement or unless Parent shall otherwise
expressly consent, from the date of this Agreement to the
Effective Time the Company shall, and shall cause each Company
Subsidiary to, conduct its business in the usual, regular and
ordinary course in all material respects consistent with past
practice and use its reasonable best efforts to preserve intact
in all material respects its current business organization, keep
available the services of its current key officers and employees
and keep its relationships with customers, suppliers, licensors,
licensees, distributors, Governmental Entities and others having
business dealings with them. In addition, and without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, except for matters set forth in
the Company Disclosure Letter or otherwise expressly permitted
or expressly contemplated by this Agreement, from the date of
this Agreement to the Effective Time, the Company shall not, and
shall not permit any Company Subsidiary to, do any of the
following without the prior written consent of Parent (which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld):
|
|
|
(i) (A) declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or
make any other distributions in respect of, any of its capital
stock, other than (1) dividends and distributions by a
direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to its
parent and (2) quarterly cash dividends payable to the
holders of shares of the Company Common Stock in an amount not
to exceed $0.125 per share of Company Common Stock,
(B) effect any reorganization or recapitalizations or
split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock or issue
or authorize the issuance of any other securities in respect of,
in lieu of or in substitution for shares of its capital stock,
or (C) purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire (1) any
shares of Company Capital Stock or other voting securities or
equity interests of the Company or any Company Subsidiary,
(2) any Company Stock-Based Awards, options, warrants,
calls, rights, convertible or exchangeable securities,
commitments, Contracts, arrangements or undertakings of any kind
to which the Company or any Company Subsidiary is a party or by
which any of them is bound, obligating the Company or any
Company Subsidiary to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be
issued, delivered or sold, shares of capital stock or other
voting securities or equity interests of, or any security
convertible or exercisable for or exchangeable into any capital
stock or other voting securities or equity interests of, the
Company or any Company Subsidiary or (3) any other rights
the value of which is in any way based upon or derived from, or
that give any person the right to receive any economic benefit
or right similar to or derived from the economic benefits and
rights accruing to holders of, capital stock or other voting
securities or equity interests of the Company or any Company
Subsidiary; |
|
|
(ii) issue, deliver, sell or grant, pledge or otherwise
encumber or subject to any Lien, (A) any shares of Company
Capital Stock or other voting securities or equity interests of
the Company or any Company Subsidiary, other than the issuance
of Company Common Stock upon the exercise of Company Stock
Options outstanding on the date of this Agreement and in
accordance with their terms as in effect on the date of this
Agreement, (B) any Company Stock-Based Awards, options,
warrants, calls, rights, convertible or exchangeable securities,
commitments, Contracts, arrangements or undertakings of any kind
to which the Company or any Company Subsidiary is a party or by
which any of them is bound, obligating the Company or any
Company Subsidiary to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be
issued, delivered or sold, shares of capital stock or other
voting securities or equity interests of, or any security
convertible or exercisable for or exchangeable into any capital
stock or other voting securities or equity interests of, the
Company or any Company Subsidiary or (C) any other rights
the value of which is in any way based on or derived from, or
that give any person the right to receive any economic benefit
or right similar to or derived from the economic benefits and
rights accruing to holders of, capital stock or other voting
securities or equity interests of the Company or any Company
Subsidiary; |
|
|
(iii) amend its certificate of incorporation, bylaws or
other comparable charter or organizational documents; |
A-27
|
|
|
(iv) other than the possible acquisition disclosed to
Parent prior to the date of this Agreement, acquire or agree to
acquire (A) by merging or consolidating with, or by
purchasing a substantial equity interest in or portion of the
assets of, or by any other manner, any business or any
corporation, partnership, joint venture, association or other
business organization or division thereof or (B) any
assets, in each case, that are material, individually or in the
aggregate, to the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, taken as
a whole; |
|
|
(v) except as required to ensure that any Company Benefit
Plan or Company Benefit Agreement is not then out of compliance
with applicable Law or to comply with any Contract, Company
Benefit Plan or Company Benefit Agreement entered into prior to
the date of this Agreement and in accordance with their
respective terms in effect as of the date of this Agreement,
(A) adopt, enter into, amend or terminate (1) any
collective bargaining agreement or Company Benefit Plan (or any
grants or awards thereunder), except for the entry into of
collective bargaining agreements negotiated in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice, or
(2) any Company Benefit Agreement or other agreement, plan
or policy involving the Company or any Company Subsidiary and
one or more of their respective directors or officers, or former
directors or officers, or, other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, any other employee or
consultant, or former employee or consultant (except, in each
case, (x) as required to bring any plan, policy,
arrangement or award (the Deferred
Arrangements) into compliance with the requirements of
Section 409A of the Code as amended by the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (the AJC Act) or to
preserve the grandfathered status of amounts accrued under the
Deferred Arrangements under Section 885(d) of the AJC Act,
provided that no such action shall be taken by the
Company without prior consultation with Parent and
(y) previously authorized change-of-control arrangements
that have been disclosed to Parent prior to the date of this
Agreement), (B) other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, increase in any manner
the compensation, bonus or fringe or other benefits of, or pay
any bonus of any kind or amount whatsoever (including making
discretionary grants or awards under any Company Benefit Plan or
Company Benefit Agreement) to, any director, officer, employee
or consultant, or any former director, officer, employee or
consultant, (C) other than in accordance with the
Companys severance policy as in effect on the date of this
Agreement, grant or pay any change of control, severance or
termination compensation or benefits or increase in any manner
the change of control severance or termination compensation or
benefits of any director, officer, employee or consultant, or
any former director, officer, employee or consultant, of the
Company or any Company Subsidiary, (D) take any action to
fund or in any other way secure the payment, or to accelerate
the vesting or payment, of compensation or benefits under any
Company Benefit Plan (or any grant or award thereunder) or
Company Benefit Agreement, except withdrawals by individual
participants in the Companys non-qualified deferred
compensation plans, or (E) materially change any actuarial
or other assumption used to calculate funding obligations with
respect to any Company Pension Plan, or change the manner in
which contributions to any Company Pension Plan are made or the
basis on which such contributions are determined; |
|
|
(vi) make any change in accounting methods, principles or
practices materially affecting the reported consolidated assets,
liabilities or results of operations of the Company, except
insofar as may have been required by a change in GAAP; |
|
|
(vii) sell, lease (as lessor), license or otherwise dispose
of, or subject to any Lien, any material assets (including
Intellectual Property Rights), except in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice; |
|
|
(viii) (A) repurchase, prepay or incur any
indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantee any such
indebtedness of another person, issue or sell any debt
securities or warrants or other rights to acquire any debt
securities of the Company or any Company Subsidiary, guarantee
any debt securities of another person, enter into any keep
well or other agreement to maintain any financial
statement condition of another person or enter into any
arrangement having the economic effect of any of the foregoing,
except for short-term borrowings incurred in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice in an amount not to
exceed $25,000,000 in the aggregate, or (B) make any loans, |
A-28
|
|
|
advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any
other person, other than to or in the Company or any direct or
indirect wholly owned Company Subsidiary, in an amount not to
exceed $5,000,000 in the aggregate; |
|
|
(ix) make or agree to make any new capital expenditure or
expenditures (other than a capital expenditure that constitutes
an allowable contract expense under a Company Government
Contract or Company Government Subcontract) that, individually,
is in excess of $3,000,000 or, in the aggregate, are in excess
of $20,000,000; |
|
|
(x) (A) pay, discharge, settle or satisfy any claims,
liabilities or obligations (absolute, accrued, asserted or
unasserted, contingent or otherwise), other than the payment,
discharge or satisfaction, in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or as required by their terms, of
(1) liabilities reflected or reserved against in, or
contemplated by, the most recent consolidated financial
statements (or the notes thereto) of the Company included in the
Filed Company SEC Documents or (2) liabilities incurred
since the date of such financial statements in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice or
(B) cancel any material indebtedness (individually or in
the aggregate) or waive any claims or rights of substantial
value; |
|
|
(xi) agree in writing to modify in any manner, or consent
to any matter with respect to which its consent is required
under, any material confidentiality agreement or any standstill
or similar agreement to which the Company or any Company
Subsidiary is a party; |
|
|
(xii) (A) enter into a Contract, or make a Bid that if
accepted would lead to a Contract, which if entered into would
(1) result in a gross profit loss to the Company or any
Company Subsidiary, (2) be a fixed price development
Contract or (3) be a Contract of the type described in
Section 3.15(b) or amend, revise or renew any such Contract
or (B) enter into any Contract under which the consummation
of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby or
compliance by the Company with the provisions of this Agreement
are reasonably likely to conflict with, or result in a violation
or breach of, or default (with or without notice or lapse of
time, or both) under, or give rise to a right of, or result in,
termination, cancelation or acceleration of any obligation or to
a loss of a material benefit under, or result in the creation of
any Lien upon any of the properties or assets of the Company or
any Company Subsidiary under, or give rise to any increased,
additional, accelerated, or guaranteed right or entitlements of
any third party under, or result in any material alteration of,
any provision of such Contract; |
|
|
(xiii) revalue any assets that are material to the Company
and the Company Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, except insofar
as required by GAAP; or |
|
|
(xiv) authorize, or commit or agree to take, any of the
foregoing actions. |
(b) Certain Tax Matters. (i) From the
date hereof until the Effective Time, the Company shall, and
shall cause each of the Company Subsidiaries to, (A) timely
prepare and file all material tax returns (Post-Signing
Returns) required to be filed consistent with past
practice; (B) timely pay all material taxes due and payable
with respect to the taxable periods covered by such Post-Signing
Returns; (C) accrue a reserve in the books and records and
financial statements of any such entity consistent with past
practice for all taxes payable by such entity for which no
Post-Signing Return is due prior to the Effective Time;
(D) promptly notify Parent of any claim, audit, suit,
proceeding or other action pending against or with respect to
the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries in respect of any
material tax and not settle or compromise any such claim, audit,
suit, proceeding or other action without Parents prior
written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld; and (E) not make or change any material tax
election or settle or compromise any material tax liability
without Parents prior written consent.
|
|
|
(ii) The Company shall not and shall not permit any Company
Subsidiary to enter into or effect any transaction that would
result in a material recognition of income or gain by the
Company or any Company Subsidiary, other than the transactions
expressly required by this Agreement or transactions entered
into or effected in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice. |
A-29
(c) Other Actions. The Company and Parent
shall not, and shall not permit any of their respective
subsidiaries to, take any action that is reasonably likely to
result in (i) any of the representations and warranties of
such party set forth in this Agreement qualified as to
materiality, Company Material Adverse Effect or Parent Material
Adverse Effect becoming untrue, (ii) any of such
representations and warranties that is not so qualified becoming
untrue in any material respect or (iii) any condition to
the Merger set forth in Article VII, not being satisfied.
(d) Advice of Changes. The Company shall
promptly advise Parent orally and in writing of any change or
event that to its knowledge has had, or is reasonably likely to
have, a Company Material Adverse Effect. Parent shall promptly
advise the Company orally and in writing of any change or event
that to its knowledge has had, or is reasonably likely to have,
a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 5.02. No
Solicitation. (a) The Company shall not, nor shall
it authorize or permit any Company Subsidiary to, nor shall it
authorize or permit any officer, director or employee of, or any
investment banker, attorney, accountant or other advisor,
representative or agent (collectively,
Representatives) of, the Company or any
Company Subsidiary to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit,
initiate or knowingly encourage, or take any other action to
knowingly facilitate, any inquiry or the making of any proposal
that constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a Takeover
Proposal or (ii) enter into, continue or otherwise
participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or
furnish to any person any information with respect to, or
otherwise cooperate in any way with, any Takeover Proposal;
provided, however, that at any time prior to
obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board
may, in response to a bona fide written Takeover
Proposal that the Company Board determines in good faith (after
consultation with a financial advisor of nationally recognized
reputation) constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a
Superior Proposal, and which Takeover Proposal did not result
from a breach of this Section 5.02, and subject to
compliance with Sections 5.02(c) and 5.02(d) (including
providing prior written notice to Parent of its decision to take
such action), (x) furnish information with respect to the
Company and the Company Subsidiaries to the person making such
Takeover Proposal (and its Representatives) pursuant to a
customary confidentiality agreement not less restrictive as a
whole of such person than the Confidentiality Agreement
(provided that such confidentiality agreement and any
related agreement shall not contain any provision having the
effect of prohibiting the Company from satisfying its
obligations under this Agreement, provided,
further, that all such information is provided or made
available on substantially concurrent basis to Parent and Sub)
and (y) participate in discussions or negotiations with the
person making such Takeover Proposal (and its Representatives)
regarding any such Takeover Proposal. Without limiting the
foregoing, it is understood that any violation of the
restrictions set forth in the preceding sentence by any
Representative of the Company or any Company Subsidiary or any
Representative of the Company or any Company Subsidiary shall be
deemed to be a breach of this Section 5.02(a) by the
Company. The Company shall, and shall use its reasonable best
efforts to cause each Company Subsidiary and each Representative
of the Company or any Company Subsidiary to, immediately cease
and cause to be terminated all existing discussions or
negotiations with any person conducted heretofore with respect
to any Takeover Proposal and request from each person that has
executed a confidentiality agreement with the Company the prompt
return or destruction of all confidential information previously
furnished to such person or its Representatives.
(b) Except as permitted by this Section 5.02(b),
neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall
(i) (A) recommend the approval or adoption of any
Takeover Proposal, (B) determine that this Agreement or the
Merger is no longer advisable, (C) withdraw (or modify in a
manner adverse to Parent or Sub) the recommendation of this
Agreement, the Merger or any of the other transactions
contemplated hereby, (D) recommend that the stockholders of
the Company reject this Agreement, the Merger or any of the
other transactions contemplated hereby or (E) resolve,
agree or propose publicly to take any such actions (each such
action set forth in this Section 5.02(b)(i) being referred
to herein as an Adverse Recommendation
Change), (ii) adopt or approve any Takeover
Proposal, or withdraw its approval of this Agreement, or
resolve, agree or propose publicly to take any of the foregoing
actions or (iii) cause or permit the Company to enter into
any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, agreement in
principle, acquisition agreement, merger agreement, option
agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement or
other agreement (each, an Acquisition
Agreement) constituting or
A-30
related to, or which is intended to or is reasonably likely to
lead to, any Takeover Proposal (other than a confidentiality
agreement referred to in, and in accordance with,
Section 5.02(a)), or resolve, agree or propose publicly to
take any such actions. Notwithstanding anything in this
Section 5.02(b) or any other provision of this Agreement to
the contrary, at any time prior to obtaining the Company
Stockholder Approval, the Company Board may (i) if the
Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with
outside counsel) that the failure to do so would result in a
breach of its fiduciary duties to the stockholders of the
Company under applicable Law, make an Adverse Recommendation
Change or (ii) solely in response to a Superior Proposal
that did not result from a breach of this Section 5.02,
cause the Company (x) to terminate this Agreement pursuant
to Section 8.01(f) and (y) immediately following such
termination, to enter into a binding Acquisition Agreement
containing the terms of a Superior Proposal; provided,
however, that (A) no such termination of this
Agreement by the Company may be made, in each case, until three
business days after the date of Parents receipt of written
notice from the Company advising Parent that the Company Board
intends to terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 8.01(f) and specifying the material terms and
conditions of, and the identity of any person making, the
Superior Proposal (it being understood and agreed that
(x) any material amendment to the financial terms or other
terms of any Superior Proposal shall require a new written
notice by the Company and (y) no such termination of this
Agreement by the Company may be made until two business days
after the date of Parents receipt of such new written
notice) and (B) the Company shall not terminate this
Agreement pursuant to Section 8.01(f), and any purported
termination pursuant to Section 8.01(f) shall be void and
of no force or effect, unless the Company shall have complied
with all applicable requirements of Section 6.07(b)
(including the payment of the Termination Fee in accordance with
the requirements thereof) in connection with such Superior
Proposal. In determining whether to make an Adverse
Recommendation Change or to terminate this Agreement as
described in this Section 5.02(b), the Company Board shall
take into account any changes to the financial and other terms
of this Agreement proposed by Parent in response to any such
written notice by the Company or otherwise.
(c) In addition to the obligations of the Company set forth
in Sections 5.02(a) and 5.02(b), the Company promptly (but
in no case later than 24 hours after receipt) shall advise
Parent orally and in writing of any Takeover Proposal or any
inquiry or request for information with respect to or that is
reasonably likely to lead to any Takeover Proposal, the identity
of the person making any such Takeover Proposal, inquiry or
request and the material terms and conditions of any such
Takeover Proposal, inquiry or request. The Company shall
(i) keep Parent informed of any changes to the material
terms and conditions of any such Takeover Proposal, inquiry or
request and (ii) provide to Parent promptly after receipt
or delivery thereof (but in no case later than 24 hours
after receipt or delivery) with copies of such Takeover
Proposal, inquiry or request (including any amendments or
supplements thereto).
(d) Nothing contained in this Section 5.02 or
elsewhere in this Agreement shall prohibit the Company from
complying with Rule 14d-9 or Rule 14e-2(a) promulgated
under the Exchange Act or from making any required disclosure to
the Companys stockholders if, in the good faith judgment
of the Company Board, after consultation with outside counsel,
failure so to disclose would be inconsistent with its fiduciary
duties or any other obligations under applicable Law;
provided, however, that in no event shall the
Company or the Company Board or any committee thereof make an
Adverse Recommendation Change, except to the extent expressly
permitted by Section 5.02(b).
(e) For purposes of this Agreement:
|
|
|
Takeover Proposal means any proposal
or offer from any person relating to, or that is reasonably
likely to lead to, (i) any direct or indirect acquisition
or purchase, in one transaction or a series of transactions,
including by way of tender offer, exchange offer, stock
acquisition, asset acquisition or acquisition of the stock of a
Company Subsidiary, of assets or businesses that constitute or
represent 20% or more of the revenues, net income or assets of
the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or
20% or more of any class of equity securities of the Company, or
(ii) any merger, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, joint venture,
binding share exchange or similar transaction involving the
Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries, in each case, other
than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. |
A-31
|
|
|
Superior Proposal means any
bona fide written offer made by a third party that
(i) if consummated would result in such third party (or in
the case of a direct merger between such third party and the
Company, the stockholders of such third party) acquiring,
directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the voting power of the
Company Common Stock or all or substantially all the assets of
the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, for
consideration consisting of cash and/or securities, that the
Company Board determines in its good faith judgment (after
consultation with a financial advisor of nationally recognized
reputation) to have a higher value than the consideration to be
received by the Companys stockholders in connection with
the Merger, taking into account, among other things, any changes
to the terms of this Agreement offered by Parent in response to
such Superior Proposal or otherwise and (ii) is reasonably
capable of being completed, taking into account all financial,
legal, regulatory and other aspects of such proposal, including
all conditions contained therein. |
ARTICLE VI
Additional Agreements
Section 6.01. Preparation
of Proxy Statement and UK Parent Circular; Stockholders
Meeting. (a) The Company shall, as promptly as
practicable following the date of this Agreement, prepare and
file with the SEC the Proxy Statement in preliminary form, and
each of the Company and Parent shall use its reasonable best
efforts to respond as promptly as practicable to any comments of
the SEC with respect thereto. The Company shall notify Parent
promptly of the receipt of any comments from the SEC or its
staff and of any request by the SEC or its staff for amendments
or supplements to the Proxy Statement or for additional
information and shall supply Parent with copies of all
correspondence between the Company or any of its
representatives, on the one hand, and the SEC or its staff, on
the other hand, with respect to the Proxy Statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to filing or mailing the
Proxy Statement (or any amendment or supplement thereto) or
responding to any comments of the SEC with respect thereto, the
Company (i) shall provide Parent with a reasonable
opportunity to review and comment on such document or response
and (ii) shall reasonably consider all comments reasonably
proposed by Parent. The Company shall use its reasonable best
efforts to cause the Proxy Statement to be mailed to the
Companys stockholders as promptly as practicable after
filing with the SEC.
(b) The Company shall, as promptly as practicable following
the date of this Agreement, establish a record date (which date
shall be as soon as practicable following the date of this
Agreement) for, duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a
meeting of its stockholders (the Company
Stockholders Meeting) for the purpose of
obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval. Subject to the
second sentence of Section 5.02(b), the Company shall,
through its Board of Directors, recommend to its stockholders
adoption of this Agreement and shall include such recommendation
in the Proxy Statement. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, the Companys obligations pursuant to the first
sentence of this Section 6.01(b) shall not be affected by
(i) the commencement, public proposal, public disclosure or
communication to the Company of any Takeover Proposal or
(ii) the withdrawal or modification by the Company Board or
any committee thereof of the Company Boards or such
committees recommendation or declaration of advisability
of this Agreement, the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
if the Company properly exercises its right to terminate this
Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with
Section 8.01(f), the Companys obligations pursuant to
the first sentence of this Section 6.01(b) shall terminate.
(c) Parent has delivered to the Company a letter from UK
Parent, dated as of the date of this Agreement (the UK
Parent Letter), containing undertakings (i) to
call an extraordinary general meeting of UK Parents
shareholders (the UK Parent Shareholder
Meeting) for the purpose of obtaining the UK Parent
Shareholder Approval and (ii) to send a circular to UK
Parents shareholders in connection with the UK Parent
Shareholder Meeting (the UK Parent Circular),
and certain matters relating thereto. The Company shall furnish
all information concerning the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries as may be reasonably requested in connection with
the preparation, filing and distribution of the UK Parent
Circular.
A-32
Section 6.02. Access
to Information; Confidentiality. The Company shall, and
shall cause each Company Subsidiary to, afford to Parent, and to
Parents officers, employees, accountants, counsel,
financial advisors and other representatives, reasonable access
during normal business hours during the period prior to the
Effective Time to all their respective properties, books,
contracts, commitments, personnel and records and, during such
period, the Company shall, and shall cause each Company
Subsidiary to, furnish promptly to Parent (a) a copy of
each report, schedule, registration statement and other document
filed by it during such period pursuant to the requirements of
supranational, national, federal, state, provincial, local or
municipal (whether domestic or foreign) Law and (b) all
other information concerning its business, properties and
personnel as Parent may reasonably request. All information
exchanged pursuant to this Section 6.02 shall be provided
pursuant to the terms of, and be subject to, the confidentiality
agreement dated February 10, 2005, between the Company and
Parent (the Confidentiality Agreement).
Section 6.03. Reasonable
Best Efforts; Notification. (a) Upon the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, each of
the parties shall use its reasonable best efforts to take, or
cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done,
and to assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all
things reasonably necessary to consummate and make effective, in
the most expeditious manner practicable, the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated hereby, including (i) the
obtaining of all applicable actions or nonactions, waivers,
consents and approvals from Governmental Entities and the making
of all applicable registrations and filings and the taking of
all reasonable steps to obtain an approval or waiver from, or to
avoid an action or proceeding by, any Governmental Entity,
(ii) the obtaining of all applicable consents, approvals or
waivers from third parties and (iii) the execution and
delivery of any additional instruments necessary to consummate
the transactions contemplated hereby and to fully carry out the
purposes of this Agreement (it being understood that nothing in
this Section 6.03 shall require Parent to (x) consent
to any action or omission that would be inconsistent with
Section 5.01 or (y) agree to amend or waive any
provision of this Agreement).
(b) In connection with and without limiting the foregoing,
|
|
|
(i) (A) the Company and Parent shall promptly submit a
joint filing and any requested supplemental information
(collectively, the Joint Filing) to the
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
(CFIUS) pursuant to 31 C.F.R.
Part 800 with regard to the transactions contemplated
hereby, (B) Parent shall take responsibility for
preparation and submission of the Joint Filing and (C) the
Company hereby agrees promptly to provide to Parent all
necessary information and otherwise to assist Parent promptly in
order for Parent to complete preparation and submission of the
Joint Filing in accordance with this Section 6.03(b)(i), to
respond to any inquiries from CFIUS or any other interested
Governmental Entity and to take all reasonable steps to secure
the approval of CFIUS of the transactions contemplated hereby, |
|
|
(ii) each party shall (A) promptly take all actions
reasonably necessary to (1) file the notification and
report form required for the transactions contemplated hereby
and provide any supplemental information in connection therewith
pursuant to the HSR Act and (2) make any filings required
under any applicable competition, antitrust or similar Law of
any jurisdiction outside the United States, and shall furnish to
the other such necessary information and assistance as the other
may reasonably request in connection with its preparation of any
filing with, or submission or response to, inquires from the
Federal Trade Commission (the FTC), the
Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (the
DOJ) or any other Governmental Entity in
connection with obtaining approval under the HSR Act and any
applicable competition, antitrust or similar Law of any
jurisdiction outside the United States, (B) keep the other
party apprised of the status of any inquiries or requests for
additional information from, the FTC or the DOJ or any
Governmental Entity in connection with obtaining approval under
any applicable competition, antitrust or similar Law of any
jurisdiction outside the United States and take all reasonable
steps to comply promptly with any such inquiry or request and
(C) participate in any interviews or meetings reasonably
requested by the FTC or the DOJ or any Governmental Entity in
connection with obtaining approval under any applicable |
A-33
|
|
|
competition, antitrust or similar Law of any jurisdiction
outside the United States in connection with the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby; and |
|
|
(iii) the Company and the Company Board shall (A) take
all action necessary to ensure that no state takeover statute or
similar statute or regulation is or becomes applicable to any
transactions contemplated hereby or this Agreement and
(B) if any state takeover statute or similar statute or
regulation becomes applicable to this Agreement, take all action
necessary to ensure that the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby may be consummated as promptly as
practicable on the terms contemplated by this Agreement and
otherwise to minimize the effect of such statute or regulation
on the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby. |
(c) Each of the Company, on the one hand, and Parent and
Sub, on the other hand, shall promptly inform the other of any
material communication with the FTC, the DOJ, CFIUS or any other
Governmental Entity (or any of their respective representatives)
regarding the transactions contemplated hereby.
(d) The Company shall give prompt notice to Parent, and
Parent or Sub shall give prompt notice to the Company, of
(i) any representation or warranty made by it that is
qualified as to materiality, Company Material Adverse Effect or
Parent Material Adverse Effect becoming untrue or inaccurate in
any respect or any such representation or warranty that is not
so qualified becoming untrue or inaccurate in any material
respect or (ii) the failure by it to comply with or satisfy
in any material respect any covenant, condition or agreement to
be complied with or satisfied by it under this Agreement;
provided, however, that no such notification shall
affect the representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
of the parties or the conditions to the obligations of the
parties under this Agreement.
(e) Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary,
this Agreement shall not require Parent or any of its affiliates
to agree to any prohibition, limitation or other requirement of
the type set forth in Section 7.02(c), and nothing in this
Agreement shall authorize the Company or any Company Subsidiary
to commit or agree to any of the foregoing.
(f) The Surviving Corporation shall, simultaneously with
the Effective Time, satisfy all outstanding obligations
(including all loans and letter of credit reimbursement
obligations) under the Company Credit Agreement. The parties
acknowledge and agree that the Company Credit Agreement requires
this Agreement to contain a contingency relating to the approval
of the Required Lenders (as defined therein) and intend this
Section 6.03(f) to satisfy such requirement.
Section 6.04. Stock
Options; Restricted Stock. (a) As soon as
practicable following the date of this Agreement, the Company
Board (or, if appropriate, any committee administering the
Company Stock Plan) shall adopt such resolutions or take such
other actions (if any) as may be required to:
|
|
|
(i) provide that each unexercised Company Stock Option
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (whether
vested or unvested) shall be converted at the Effective Time
into the right to receive an amount of cash equal to
(A) the excess, if any, of (1) the Merger
Consideration per share of Company Common Stock over
(2) the exercise price per share of Company Common Stock
subject to such Company Stock Option, multiplied by (B) the
number of shares of Company Common Stock constituting the
unexercised portion of such Company Stock Option, which amount
shall be paid as soon as practicable following (but in no event
more than 15 days after) the Effective Time, without
interest; |
|
|
(ii) provide that each share of Company Restricted Stock
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall become
at the Effective Time fully vested and free of restrictions on
transfer and the holder thereof shall be entitled to receive the
Merger Consideration subject to the terms and conditions of
Article II hereof; and |
|
|
(iii) make such other changes to the Company Stock Plan as
the Company and Parent may agree are appropriate to give effect
to the Merger and the terms of this Agreement. |
(b) All amounts payable pursuant to Section 6.04(a)
shall be subject to any required withholding of taxes or proof
of eligibility of exemption therefrom.
A-34
(c) The Company shall ensure that following the Effective
Time, no holder of a Company Stock Option or share of Company
Restricted Stock (or former holder thereof) or any participant
in any Company Stock Plan, Company Benefit Plan or Company
Benefit Agreement shall have any right thereunder to acquire any
capital stock of the Company or the Surviving Corporation or any
other equity interest therein (including phantom
stock or stock appreciation rights).
Section 6.05. Employee
Matters. (a) During the period from the Effective
Time through and including December 31, 2006, the employees
of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries who remain in the
employment of the Surviving Corporation and its Subsidiaries
(the Continuing Employees) shall receive
(i) wages and cash bonus opportunities that in the
aggregate are substantially comparable to the wages and cash
bonus opportunities provided by the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries to such employees immediately prior to the
Effective Time, (ii) long-term incentive awards (which
Parent currently expects will consist of stock appreciation
rights and performance shares) that in the aggregate are
substantially comparable to the long-term incentive awards
granted to similarly situated employees of Parent as of the date
hereof and (iii) other employee benefits (excluding for all
purposes of this clause (iii) equity and equity-based
compensation and long-term incentive awards) that in the
aggregate are substantially comparable to the other employee
benefits provided under the Companys employee benefit
plans to such employees immediately prior to the Effective Time .
(b) Nothing contained herein shall be construed as
requiring, and the Company shall take no action that would have
the effect of requiring, Parent or the Surviving Corporation to
continue any specific plans or to continue the employment of any
specific person.
(c) Parent shall cause the Surviving Corporation to
recognize the service of each Continuing Employee as if such
service had been performed with Parent (i) for purposes of
eligibility and vesting (but not benefit accrual under any
defined benefit pension plan) under Parents employee
pension benefit plans, (ii) for purposes of eligibility for
vacation, and determining the amount of vacation to be received
under Parents vacation programs, (iii) for purposes
of eligibility and participation under any health or welfare
plan maintained by Parent (other than any post-employment health
or post-employment welfare plan) and (iv) unless covered
under another arrangement with or of the Company, for
eligibility and benefit calculation purposes under Parents
severance plans (in the case of each of clauses (i), (ii),
(iii) and (iv), solely to the extent that Parent elects to
make such plan or program available to employees of the
Surviving Corporation), but not for purposes of any other
employee benefit plan of Parent.
(d) With respect to any welfare plan maintained by Parent
in which Continuing Employees are eligible to participate after
the Effective Time, Parent and its subsidiaries (including the
Surviving Corporation) shall use commercially reasonable efforts
to (i) waive, or cause to be waived, all limitations as to
preexisting conditions, exclusions with respect to participation
and coverage requirements applicable to such employees to the
extent such conditions, exclusions and requirements were
satisfied or did not apply to such employees under the welfare
plans of the Company and its Subsidiaries prior to the Effective
Time and (ii) provide each Continuing Employee with credit
for any co-payments and annual deductibles paid prior to the
Effective Time in satisfying any analogous deductible or
out-of-pocket requirements to the extent applicable under any
such plan.
Section 6.06. Indemnification.
(a) Parent shall, to the fullest extent permitted by Law,
honor or cause the Surviving Corporation to honor all the
Companys obligations to indemnify (including any
obligations to advance funds for expenses) the current or former
directors or officers of the Company (each, an
Indemnified Party) for acts or omissions by
such directors and officers occurring prior to the Effective
Time to the extent that such obligations of the Company exist on
the date of this Agreement, whether pursuant to the Company
Charter, the Company Bylaws, individual indemnity agreements or
otherwise, and such obligations shall survive the Merger and
shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the
terms of the Company Charter, the Company Bylaws, and such
individual indemnity agreements from the Effective Time until
the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations with
respect to any claims against such directors or officers arising
out of such acts or omissions.
(b) For a period of six years after the Effective Time,
Parent shall cause to be maintained in effect the current
policies of directors and officers liability
insurance maintained by the Company (provided that
A-35
Parent may substitute therefor policies with reputable and
financially sound carriers of at least the same coverage and
amounts containing terms and conditions which are no less
advantageous) with respect to claims arising from or related to
facts or events which occurred at or before the Effective Time;
provided, however, that Parent shall not be
obligated to make annual premium payments for such insurance to
the extent such premiums exceed 300% of the most recent annual
premium paid prior to the date of this Agreement (such 300%
amount, the Maximum Premium). If such
insurance coverage cannot be obtained at all, or can only be
obtained at an annual premium in excess of the Maximum Premium,
Parent shall maintain the most advantageous policies of
directors and officers insurance obtainable for an
annual premium equal to the Maximum Premium. The Company
represents to Parent that the Maximum Premium is $3,181,908.
(c) Each of Parent and Sub covenants, for itself and its
successors and assigns, that it and they shall not institute any
action or proceeding in any court or before any administrative
agency or before any other tribunal against any of the current
directors of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, in their
capacity as such, with respect to any liabilities, actions, or
causes of action, judgments, claims, or demands of any nature or
description (consequential, compensatory, punitive or
otherwise), in each such case, to the extent resulting from
their approval of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby.
(d) The Surviving Corporation shall not take any action
directly or indirectly to disaffirm or adversely affect the
provisions of the Company Charter and Company Bylaws and any
other written agreements of the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries that provide indemnification of and expense
reimbursement to an Indemnified Party.
(e) In the event the Surviving Corporation or Parent or any
of their successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or
merges into any other person and shall not be the continuing or
surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger
or (ii) transfers all or substantially all of its
properties and assets to any person, then and in each such case,
proper provisions shall be made so that the successors and
assigns of the Surviving Corporation or Parent, as the case may
be, shall assume the obligations of the Surviving Corporation or
the Parent, as the case may be, set forth in this
Section 6.06.
(f) Parent shall pay all reasonable expenses, including
reasonable attorneys fees, incurred by any Indemnified
Party in connection with successfully enforcing the obligations
provided in this Section 6.06.
(g) The rights of each Indemnified Party hereunder shall be
in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other rights such
Indemnified Party may have under the Company Charter or Company
Bylaws, any indemnification agreement or the DGCL or otherwise.
The provisions of this Section 6.06 shall survive the
consummation of the Merger and are expressly intended to benefit
each of the Indemnified Parties.
Section 6.07. Fees
and Expenses. (a) Except as otherwise provided
below, all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby shall be
paid by the party incurring such fees or expenses, whether or
not the Merger is consummated.
(b) In the event that:
|
|
|
(i) (A) a Takeover Proposal has been made to the
Company or its stockholders or a Takeover Proposal shall have
otherwise become publicly known, (B) thereafter this
Agreement is terminated by either Parent or the Company pursuant
to Section 8.01(b)(i) or Section 8.01(b)(iii) and
(C) at any time (1) on or prior to the six-month
anniversary of such termination, the Company or any Company
Subsidiary (x) enters into any Acquisition Agreement with
respect to any Takeover Proposal or (y) the transactions
contemplated by any Takeover Proposal are consummated or
(2) after the six-month anniversary but prior to the
12-month anniversary of such termination, the Company or any
Company Subsidiary (x) enters into any Acquisition
Agreement with respect to any Takeover Proposal made by a
Designated Party or (y) the transactions contemplated by
any Takeover Proposal are consummated by a Designated Party; |
|
|
(ii) this Agreement is terminated by the Company pursuant
to Section 8.01(f); or |
|
|
(iii) this Agreement is terminated by Parent pursuant to
Section 8.01(c) and either (A) prior to such
termination a Takeover Proposal has been made to the Company or
its stockholders or a |
A-36
|
|
|
Takeover Proposal shall have otherwise become publicly known or
(B) at any time prior to the 12-month anniversary of such
termination, the Company or any Company Subsidiary enters into
any Acquisition Agreement with respect to any Takeover Proposal
or the transactions contemplated by any Takeover Proposal are
consummated, |
then, in each case under this Section 6.07(b), the Company
shall pay Parent a fee equal to $119,233,768 (the
Termination Fee) by wire transfer of same day
funds to an account designated by Parent (x) in the case of
a termination by the Company pursuant to Section 8.01(f),
prior to or simultaneously with such termination, (y) in
the case of a termination by Parent pursuant to
Section 8.01(c) referred to in
Section 6.07(b)(iii)(A), within two business days after
such termination and (z) in the case of a payment as a
result of any event referred to in Section 6.07(b)(i)(C) or
Section 6.07(b)(iii)(B), upon the earlier of execution of
such Acquisition Agreement or consummation of the transactions
contemplated by such Takeover Proposal (unless the transactions
contemplated by such Takeover Proposal were consummated prior to
such termination, in which case, the Termination Fee shall be
payable on the date of such termination). For purposes of this
Section 6.07(b), Designated Party means
any of the following persons and their affiliates: (x) any
person with whom the Company or any of its affiliates has
engaged (directly or through Representatives) within four months
prior to the date of this Agreement, in any discussion regarding
any possible Takeover Proposal or (y) any person who makes
or consummates a Takeover Proposal prior to termination of this
Agreement. Solely for purposes of this Section 6.07(b), the
number 40 shall be substituted for the number
20 in the definition of Takeover Proposal.
(c) The parties acknowledge that the agreements contained
in Sections 6.07(b) are an integral part of the
transactions contemplated hereby, and that, without these
agreements, they would not enter into this Agreement.
Section 6.08. Public
Announcements. Parent and Sub, on the one hand, and the
Company, on the other hand, shall consult with each other before
issuing, and provide each other the opportunity to review and
comment upon, any press release or other public statements with
respect to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby and shall not issue any such press release or make any
such public statement prior to such consultation, except as may
be required by applicable Law, court process or obligations
pursuant to the rules of any securities exchange or self
regulatory authority (including the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. and the rules and regulations of the UKLA), or in response
to a request by a Governmental Entity.
Section 6.09. Transfer
Taxes. Subject to Section 2.02(b), all stock
transfer, real estate transfer, documentary, stamp, recording
and other similar taxes (including interest, penalties and
additions to any such taxes) (Transfer Taxes)
incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby
shall be paid by either Parent or the Surviving Corporation, and
the Company shall cooperate with Sub and Parent in preparing,
executing and filing any tax returns with respect to such
Transfer Taxes, including supplying in a timely manner any
information with respect to such property that is reasonably
necessary to complete such tax returns.
Section 6.10. Stockholder
Litigation. The Company shall give Parent the
opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any
stockholder litigation against the Company and its directors
relating to any of the transactions contemplated hereby.
ARTICLE VII
Conditions Precedent
Section 7.01. Conditions
to Each Partys Obligation To Effect The Merger.
The respective obligation of each party to effect the Merger is
subject to the satisfaction or waiver on or prior to the Closing
Date of the following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Company Stockholder Approval. The Company
shall have obtained the Company Stockholder Approval. |
A-37
|
|
|
(b) Governmental Approvals. (i) Any
waiting period (and any extensions thereof) applicable to the
Merger under the HSR Act shall have been terminated,
(ii) the period of time for any applicable review process
under Exon-Florio shall have expired, and the President of the
United States shall not have taken action to prevent the
consummation of the Merger or the transactions contemplated
hereby, (iii) any applicable approvals pursuant to any
competition, antitrust or similar Law of any jurisdiction
outside the United States shall have been obtained, (iv) no
Governmental Entity shall have taken any action to revoke the
license under the Swedish Act on War Equipment granted to Bofors
and (v) any and all other authorizations, consents, orders
or approvals of, or declarations or filings with, or expirations
of waiting periods imposed by, any Governmental Entity necessary
for the consummation of the Merger or the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement shall have been obtained or filed
or shall have occurred, except any authorization, consent,
order, approval, declaration, filing or expiration the failure
of which to be obtained or filed or to occur is not reasonably
likely to have a material adverse effect on the business,
assets, financial condition or results of operations of
(x) the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, or (y) Parent and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole. |
|
|
(c) No Injunctions or Restraints. No
temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction
or other order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or
other legal restraint or Law prohibiting the consummation of the
Merger or the transactions contemplated hereby shall be in
effect. |
|
|
(d) UK Parent Shareholder Approval. UK Parent
shall have obtained the UK Parent Shareholder Approval. |
Section 7.02. Conditions
to Obligations of Parent and Sub. The obligations of
Parent and Sub to effect the Merger are further subject to the
satisfaction or waiver on or prior to the Closing Date of the
following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties.
(i) The representations and warranties of the Company in
this Agreement shall be true and correct, without regard to any
materiality or Company Material Adverse Effect qualifiers
contained therein, as of the Closing Date (as though made on the
Closing Date), except to the extent such representations and
warranties expressly relate to an earlier date (in which case
such representations and warranties shall be true and correct,
without regard to any materiality or Company Material Adverse
Effect qualifiers contained therein, as of such earlier date),
except where the failure of such representations and warranties
to be true and correct, individually or in the aggregate, is not
reasonably likely to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
|
(ii) The representations and warranties of the Company set
forth in Sections 3.03, 3.06(k), 3.12(b), 3.13(c), 3.15(b),
3.15(c)(ii), 3.15(c)(iii) and 3.15(d) that are qualified as to
materiality or Company Material Adverse Effect shall be true and
correct and those not so qualified shall be true and correct in
all material respects, as of the date of this Agreement and as
of the Closing Date (as though made on the Closing Date), except
to the extent such representations and warranties expressly
relate to an earlier date (in which case such representations
and warranties qualified as to materiality or Company Material
Adverse Effect shall be true and correct, and those not so
qualified shall be true and correct in all material respects, on
and as of such earlier date). |
|
|
(iii) Parent shall have received a certificate signed on
behalf of the Company by the chief executive officer and the
chief financial officer of the Company to the effect of
clauses (i) and (ii) above. |
(b) Performance of Obligations of the
Company. The Company shall have performed in all
material respects all obligations required to be performed by it
under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and Parent
shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of the
Company by the chief executive officer and the chief financial
officer of the Company to such effect.
(c) No Litigation. There shall not be pending
or threatened in writing any suit, proceeding or other action
that has a reasonable likelihood of success by any Governmental
Entity located in the United States
A-38
(i) challenging the acquisition by Parent or Sub of any
Company Common Stock, seeking to restrain or prohibit the
consummation of the Merger or any of the other transactions
contemplated hereby, (ii) seeking to prohibit, limit or
impose restrictions on or requirements related to the ownership
or operation by the Company, Parent or any of their respective
affiliates of any material portion of the business or assets of
the Company, Parent or any of their respective affiliates or to
compel the Company, Parent or any of their respective affiliates
to dispose of or hold separate any material portion of the
business or assets of the Company, Parent or any of their
respective affiliates, as a result of the Merger or any other
transaction contemplated hereby, (iii) seeking to impose
limitations on the ability of Parent to acquire or hold, or
exercise full rights of ownership of, any shares of capital
stock of the Surviving Corporation or (iv) seeking to
prohibit Parent or any of its affiliates from effectively
controlling in any material respect the business or operations
of the Surviving Corporation.
(d) Absence of Material Adverse Change. Since
December 31, 2004, there shall not have been any Company
Material Adverse Change.
Section 7.03. Conditions
to Obligations of the Company. The obligation of the
Company to effect the Merger is further subject to the
satisfaction or waiver on or prior to the Closing Date of the
following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties of Parent and Sub in this
Agreement shall be true and correct, without regard to any
materiality or Parent Material Adverse Effect qualifiers
contained therein, as of the Closing Date (as though made on the
Closing Date), except to the extent such representations and
warranties expressly relate to an earlier date (in which case
such representations and warranties shall be true and correct,
without regard to any materiality or Parent Material Adverse
Effect qualifiers contained therein, as of such earlier date),
except where the failure of such representations and warranties
to be true and correct, individually or in the aggregate, is not
reasonably likely to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, and
the Company shall have received a certificate signed on behalf
of Parent by the chief executive officer and the chief financial
officer of Parent to such effect. |
|
|
(b) Performance of Obligations of the Parent and
Sub. Parent and Sub shall have performed in all material
respects all obligations to be performed by them under this
Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and the Company shall
have received a certificate signed on behalf of Parent by the
chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of
Parent to such effect. |
ARTICLE VIII
Termination, Amendment and Waiver
Section 8.01. Termination.
This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
Effective Time:
|
|
|
(a) by mutual written consent of Parent, Sub and the
Company; |
|
|
(b) by either Parent or the Company: |
|
|
|
(i) if the Merger is not consummated on or before
December 6, 2005 (such date, as extended, the
Outside Date), unless the failure to
consummate the Merger is the result of a wilful and material
breach of this Agreement by the party seeking to terminate this
Agreement; |
|
|
(ii) if any Governmental Entity issues an order, decree or
ruling or takes any other action permanently enjoining,
restraining or otherwise prohibiting the Merger and such order,
decree, ruling or other action shall have become final and
nonappealable; |
|
|
(iii) if the Company Stockholder Approval shall not have
been obtained by reason of the failure to obtain the required
vote at the Company Stockholders Meeting duly convened for
the purpose of obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval or any
adjournment or postponement thereof; or |
A-39
|
|
|
(iv) if the UK Parent Shareholder Approval shall not have
been obtained by reason of the failure to obtain the required
vote at the UK Parent Shareholder Meeting duly convened for the
purpose of obtaining the UK Parent Shareholder Approval or any
adjournment or postponement thereof; |
|
|
|
(c) by Parent, in the event an Adverse Recommendation
Change has occurred within 10 days after the occurrence of
such Adverse Recommendation Change; |
|
|
(d) by Parent, if the Company breaches or fails to perform
any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
contained in this Agreement, which breach or failure to perform
(i) would give rise to the failure of a condition set forth
in Section 7.02(a) or 7.02(b), and (ii) cannot be or
has not been cured within 30 days after the giving of
written notice to the Company of such breach (provided
that Parent is not then in material breach of any
representation, warranty or covenant contained in this
Agreement); |
|
|
(e) by the Company, if Parent or Sub breaches or fails to
perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or
agreements contained in this Agreement, which breach or failure
to perform (i) would give rise to the failure of a
condition set forth in Section 7.03(a) or 7.03(b), and
(ii) cannot be or has not been cured within 30 days
after the giving of written notice to Parent and Sub of such
breach (provided that the Company is not then in material
breach of any representation, warranty or covenant contained in
this Agreement); or |
|
|
(f) by the Company, at any time prior to obtaining the
Company Stockholder Approval, in accordance with
Section 5.02(b); provided, however, that the
Company shall have complied with all provisions of
Section 5.02, including the notification provisions
thereof, and shall have paid the Termination Fee in accordance
with Section 6.07(b); or |
|
|
(g) by the Company, if (i) the Board of Directors of
UK Parent shall have failed to recommend the approval of the
Merger by the shareholders of UK Parent in the UK Parent
Circular or (ii) the Board of Directors of UK Parent (or
any committee thereof) shall have made a Change in UK Parent
Recommendation (as defined in the UK Parent Letter), whether or
not permitted by the terms hereof, in each case, within
10 days after the occurrence of the event giving the
Company the right to terminate under this Section 8.01(g). |
Section 8.02. Effect
of Termination. In the event of termination of this
Agreement by either the Company or Parent as provided in
Section 8.01, this Agreement shall forthwith become void
and have no effect, without any liability or obligation on the
part of Parent, Sub or the Company, other than
Section 3.19, Section 4.06, the last sentence of
Section 6.02, Section 6.07, Section 6.08, this
Section 8.02 and Article IX, which provisions shall
survive such termination, and except to the extent that such
termination results from the wilful and material breach by a
party of any representation, warranty or covenant set forth in
this Agreement.
Section 8.03. Amendment.
This Agreement may be amended by the parties at any time;
provided, however, that (i) there shall be
made no amendment that by Law requires further approval by the
stockholders of the Company without the further approval of such
stockholders, (ii) no amendment shall be made to this
Agreement after the Effective Time and (iii) except as
provided above, no amendment of this Agreement by the Company
shall require the approval of the stockholders of the Company.
This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in
writing signed on behalf of each of the parties.
Section 8.04. Extension;
Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time, the
parties may (a) extend the time for the performance of any
of the obligations or other acts of the other parties,
(b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and
warranties contained in this Agreement or in any document
delivered pursuant to this Agreement or (c) subject to the
proviso of Section 8.03, waive compliance with any of the
agreements or conditions contained in this Agreement. Subject to
the proviso in Section 8.03, no extension or waiver by the
Company shall require the approval of the stockholders of the
Company. Any agreement on the part of a party to any such
extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an
instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party. The
failure of any party to this
A-40
Agreement to assert any of its rights under this Agreement or
otherwise shall not constitute a waiver of such rights.
Section 8.05. Procedure
for Termination, Amendment, Extension or Waiver. A
termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.01, an
amendment of this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.03 or an
extension or waiver pursuant to Section 8.04 shall, in
order to be effective, require in the case of Parent, Sub or the
Company, action by its board of directors or the duly authorized
designee of its board of directors. Termination of this
Agreement prior to the Effective Time shall not require the
approval of the stockholders of the Company.
ARTICLE IX
General Provisions
Section 9.01. Nonsurvival
of Representations, Warranties and Agreements. None of
the representations, warranties, covenants and other agreements
in this Agreement or in any instrument delivered pursuant to
this Agreement, including any rights arising out of any breach
of such representations, warranties, covenants and other
agreements, shall survive the Effective Time. This
Section 9.01 shall not, however, limit any covenant or
agreement of the parties which by its terms contemplates
performance after the Effective Time.
Section 9.02. Notices.
All notices, requests, claims, demands and other communications
under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed
given upon receipt by the parties at the following addresses (or
at such other address for a party as shall be specified by like
notice):
(a) if to Parent or Sub, to
|
|
|
BAE Systems North America Inc. |
|
1601 Research Boulevard |
|
Rockville, MD 20850 |
|
Phone: (301) 838-6000 |
|
Fax: (301) 838-6942 |
|
Attention: Sheila C. Cheston, Esq. |
|
|
with a copy to: |
|
|
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP |
|
825 Eighth Avenue |
|
New York, NY 10019 |
|
Phone: (212) 474-1000 |
|
Fax: (212) 474-3700 |
|
Attention: Philip A. Gelston, Esq. |
|
Sarkis
Jebejian, Esq. |
(b) if to the Company, to
|
|
|
United Defense Industries, Inc. |
|
1525 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 700 |
|
Arlington, VA 22209 |
|
Phone: (703) 312-6156 |
|
Fax: (703) 312-6196 |
|
Attention: David V. Kolovat, Esq. |
A-41
|
|
|
with a copy to: |
|
|
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP |
|
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. |
|
Washington, D.C. 20036 |
|
Phone: (202) 955-8593 |
|
Fax: (202) 530-9598 |
|
Attention: Stephen I. Glover, Esq. |
|
Stephanie
Tsacoumis, Esq. |
Section 9.03. Definitions.
For purposes of this Agreement:
|
|
|
An affiliate of any person means another
person that directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, such first person. |
|
|
A business day means any day, other than a
Saturday, Sunday or one on which banks are authorized by Law to
close in New York, New York or London, England. |
|
|
A Company Material Adverse Change means any
event, change, effect or development that, individually or in
the aggregate, is reasonably likely to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect, other than events, changes, effects or
developments arising out of, or caused by, (i) general
economic conditions, (ii) conditions generally affecting
the industries in which the Company operates, (iii) the
financial markets in general, (iv) the entering into or the
public announcement or disclosure of this Agreement or the
consummation or proposed consummation of the Merger or the
pendancy thereof, including any events, changes, effects or
developments arising from UK Parents ownership or proposed
ownership of the Company or (v) appropriations arising from
the U.S. Fiscal Year 2005 Supplemental Budget or the
U.S. Fiscal Year 2006 Budget. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, any event, change, effect or
development (whether or not previously disclosed in any document
filed with, or furnished to, the SEC, the Company Disclosure
Letter or otherwise) that, individually or in the aggregate, has
resulted in the suspension or debarment of, or actions by the
U.S. government relating to the suspension or debarment of,
the Company (or any portion thereof) or any Company Subsidiary
(or any portion thereof) from participation in the award of any
Contract with any Governmental Entity located in the United
States shall be deemed to constitute a Company Material Adverse
Change. |
|
|
A Company Material Adverse Effect means a
material adverse effect on (i) the business, assets,
financial condition or results of operations of the Company and
the Company Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (ii) the
ability of the Company to consummate the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby. |
|
|
A Parent Material Adverse Effect means a
material adverse effect on the ability of Parent or Sub to
consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby. |
|
|
A person means any individual, firm,
corporation, partnership, company, limited liability company,
trust, joint venture, association, Governmental Entity or other
entity. |
|
|
A subsidiary of any person means another
person, an amount of the voting securities, other voting
ownership or voting partnership interests of which is sufficient
to elect at least a majority of its board of directors or other
governing body (or, if there are no such voting interests, 50%
or more of the equity interests of which) is owned directly or
indirectly by such first person. |
Section 9.04. Interpretation.
When a reference is made in this Agreement to a Section,
Subsection, Exhibit or Schedule, such reference shall be to a
Section or Subsection of, or an Exhibit or Schedule to, this
Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of contents and
headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes
only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words hereby,
hereof, herein and hereunder
and words of similar import when used in this Agreement shall
refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular
provision of this Agreement. The words date
A-42
hereof shall refer to the date of this Agreement. The term
or is not exclusive. The word extent in
the phrase to the extent shall mean the degree to
which a subject or other thing extends, and such phrase shall
not mean simply if. The definitions contained in
this Agreement are applicable to the singular as well as the
plural forms of such terms. Any agreement or instrument defined
or referred to herein or in any agreement or instrument that is
referred to herein means such agreement or instrument as from
time to time amended, modified or supplemented. References to a
person are also to its permitted successors and assigns.
Section 9.05. Severability.
If any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule or Law, or
public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this
Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so
long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions
contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially
adverse to any party. Upon such determination that any term or
other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being
enforced, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith to
modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the
parties as closely as possible in an acceptable manner to the
end that transactions contemplated hereby are fulfilled to the
extent possible.
Section 9.06. Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all
of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been
signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties.
Section 9.07. Entire
Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement,
taken together with the Company Disclosure Letter and the
Confidentiality Agreement, (a) constitute the entire
agreement, and supersede all prior agreements and
understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with
respect to the transactions contemplated hereby and
(b) except for Sections 6.04 and 6.06, are not
intended to confer upon any person other than the parties any
rights or remedies.
Section 9.08. Disclosure
Generally. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in the Company Disclosure Letter or in this Agreement,
the information and disclosures contained in any section of the
Company Disclosure Letter shall be deemed to be disclosed and
incorporated by reference in any other section of the Company
Disclosure Letter as though fully set forth in such section of
the Company Disclosure Letter for which applicability of such
information and disclosure is readily apparent on its face.
Section 9.09. Governing
Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed
in accordance with, the Laws of the State of New York,
regardless of the Laws that might otherwise govern under
applicable principles of conflicts of laws thereof, except to
the extent the Laws of Delaware are mandatorily applicable to
the Merger.
Section 9.10. Assignment.
Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or
obligations under this Agreement shall be assigned, in whole or
in part, by operation of Law or otherwise by any of the parties
without the prior written consent of the other parties, except
that Sub may assign, in its sole discretion, any of or all its
rights, interests and obligations under this Agreement to Parent
or to any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent,
but no such assignment shall relieve Sub of any of its
obligations under this Agreement. Any purported assignment
without such consent shall be void. Subject to the preceding
sentences, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the
benefit of, and be enforceable by, the parties and their
respective successors and assigns.
Section 9.11. Enforcement.
The parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the
event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not
performed in accordance with their specific terms or were
otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties
shall be entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions to
prevent breaches of this Agreement and to seek to enforce
specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement in any
New York state court, any Federal court located in the State of
New York or the State of Delaware or in any Delaware state
court, this being in addition to any other remedy to which they
are entitled at Law or in equity. In addition, each of the
parties irrevocably agrees that any legal action or proceeding
arising out of or related to this Agreement or for recognition
and enforcement of any judgment in respect hereof brought by any
other party hereto or its successors or assigns may be brought
and determined in any New York state court, any Federal court
located in the State of New York
A-43
or the State of Delaware or Court of Chancery in and for New
Castle County in the State of Delaware, and each of the parties
hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the
aforesaid courts for itself and with respect to its property,
unconditionally, with regard to any such action or proceeding
arising out of or relating to this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby (and agrees not to commence any
action, suit or proceeding relating thereto except in such
courts). Each of the parties agrees further to accept service of
process in any manner permitted by such courts. Each of the
parties hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives, and
agrees not to assert, by way of motion or as a defense,
counterclaim or otherwise, in any action or proceeding arising
out of or related to this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby, (a) any claim that it is not
personally subject to the jurisdiction of the above-named courts
for any reason other than the failure lawfully to serve process,
(b) that it or its property is exempt or immune from
jurisdiction of any such court or from any legal process
commenced in such courts (whether through service of notice,
attachment prior to judgment, attachment in aid of execution of
judgment, execution of judgment or otherwise), (c) to the
fullest extent permitted by Law, that (i) the suit, action
or proceeding in any such court is brought in an inconvenient
forum, (ii) the venue of such suit, action or proceeding is
improper, or (iii) this Agreement, or the subject matter
hereof, may not be enforced in or by such courts, and
(d) any right to a trial by jury.
A-44
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Sub and the Company have duly
executed this Agreement, all as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
BAE SYSTEMS NORTH AMERICA INC., |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Senior Vice President and General Counsel |
|
|
|
UTE ACQUISITION COMPANY INC., |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President and Secretary |
|
|
|
UNITED DEFENSE INDUSTRIES, INC., |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
A-45
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
SURVIVING CORPORATION
ARTICLE I
The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the
Corporation) is Ute Acquisition Company Inc.
ARTICLE II
The address of the Corporations registered office in the
State of Delaware is 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle
County, Delaware. The name of the registered agent at such
address is The Corporation Trust Company.
ARTICLE III
The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or
activity for which corporations may be organized under the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
ARTICLE IV
The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the
Corporation shall have authority to issue is 1,000 shares
of Common Stock having the par value of $0.01 per share.
ARTICLE V
The number of directors of the Corporation shall be fixed from
time to time by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
ARTICLE VI
In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred
upon it by law, the Board of Directors of the Corporation is
expressly authorized to adopt, amend or repeal the By-laws of
the Corporation.
ARTICLE VII
Unless and except to the extent that the By-laws of the
Corporation so require, the election of directors of the
Corporation need not be by written ballot.
ARTICLE VIII
To the fullest extent from time to time permitted by law, no
director of the Corporation shall be personally liable to any
extent to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary
damages for breach of his fiduciary duty as a director.
ARTICLE IX
Each person who is or was or had agreed to become a director or
officer of the Corporation, and each such person who is or was
serving or who had agreed to serve at the request of the
Corporation as a director, officer, partner, member, employee or
agent of another corporation, partnership, limited liability
company, joint venture, trust or other enterprise (including the
heirs, executor, administrators or estate of such person), shall
be indemnified by the Corporation to the fullest extent
permitted from time to time by applicable law, which
indemnification shall not be deemed exclusive of any other
rights to which such person may be entitled under the By-laws of
the Corporation or any agreement, vote of stockholders or
disinterested directors or otherwise. Any repeal or modification
of this Article IX shall not adversely affect any right to
indemnification of any persons existing at the time of such
repeal or modification with respect to any matter occurring
prior to such repeal or modification.
A-46
ANNEX B
March 6, 2005
The Board of Directors
United Defense Industries, Inc.
1525 Wilson Boulevard
Suite 700
Arlington, VA 22209
Members of the Board of Directors:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of common stock, par
value $0.01 per share (the Company Common
Stock), of United Defense Industries, Inc. (the
Company) of the consideration to be received by such
holders in the proposed merger (the Merger) of the
Company with Ute Acquisition Company Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary (the MergerSub) of BAE Systems North
America Inc. (the Merger Partner). Pursuant to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Agreement), among
the Company, the Merger Partner and the MergerSub, the Company
will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Merger Partner, and
each outstanding share of Company Common Stock, other than
Appraisal Shares (as defined in the Agreement) and shares of
Company Common Stock held in treasury or owned by the Merger
Partner and its affiliates, will be converted into the right to
receive $75.00 per share in cash.
In arriving at our opinion, we have (i) reviewed a draft
dated March 5, 2005 of the Agreement; (ii) reviewed
certain publicly available business and financial information
concerning the Company and the industries in which it operates;
(iii) compared the proposed financial terms of the Merger
with the publicly available financial terms of certain
transactions involving companies we deemed relevant and the
consideration received for such companies; (iv) compared
the financial and operating performance of the Company with
publicly available information concerning certain other
companies we deemed relevant and reviewed the current and
historical market prices of the Company Common Stock and certain
publicly traded securities of such other companies;
(v) reviewed certain internal financial analyses and
forecasts prepared by the management of the Company relating to
its business; and (vi) performed such other financial
studies and analyses and considered such other information as we
deemed appropriate for the purposes of this opinion.
In addition, we have held discussions with certain members of
the management of the Company and the Merger Partner with
respect to certain aspects of the Merger, and the past and
current business operations of the Company, the financial
condition and future prospects and operations of the Company,
and certain other matters we believed necessary or appropriate
to our inquiry.
In giving our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed, without
assuming responsibility or liability for independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information
that was publicly available or was furnished to or discussed
with us by the Company and the Merger Partner or otherwise
reviewed by or for us. We have not conducted or been provided
with any valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities,
nor have we evaluated the solvency of the Company or the Merger
Partner under any state, federal or international laws relating
to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In relying on
financial analyses and forecasts provided to us, we have assumed
that they have been reasonably prepared based on assumptions
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
by management as to the expected future results of operations
and financial condition of the Company to which such analyses or
forecasts relate. We express no view as to such analyses or
forecasts or the assumptions on which they were based. We have
also assumed that the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Agreement will be consummated as described
in the Agreement and that the definitive Agreement will not
differ in any material respects from the draft thereof furnished
to us. We have relied as to all legal matters relevant to
rendering our opinion upon the advice of counsel. We have also
assumed that all material governmental, regulatory or other
consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the
Merger
B-1
will be obtained without any adverse effect on the Company or on
the contemplated benefits of the Merger.
Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we do
not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm this
opinion. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the consideration to be received by
the holders of the Company Common Stock in the proposed Merger
and we express no opinion as to the fairness of the Merger to,
or any consideration of, the holders of any other class of
securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company or
the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the Merger.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company with respect
to the proposed Merger and will receive a fee from the Company
for our services. We will also receive an additional fee if the
proposed Merger is consummated. In addition, the Company has
agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out of
our engagement. We and our affiliates, in the ordinary course of
business have, from time to time, provided, and in the future
may continue to provide, commercial and investment banking
services to the Company, the Merger Partner and their respective
affiliates, in each case for customary compensation. In the
ordinary course of our businesses, we and our affiliates may
actively trade the debt and equity securities of the Company or
the Merger Partner for our own account or for the accounts of
customers and, accordingly, we may at any time hold long or
short positions in such securities.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion,
as of the date hereof, that the consideration to be received by
the holders of the Company Common Stock in the proposed Merger
is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.
This letter is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company
in connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the
Merger. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any
shareholder of the Company as to how such shareholder should
vote with respect to the Merger or any other matter. This
opinion may not be disclosed, referred to, or communicated (in
whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose whatsoever
except with our prior written approval. This opinion may be
reproduced in full in any proxy or information statement mailed
to shareholders of the Company but may not otherwise be
disclosed publicly in any manner without our prior written
approval.
|
|
|
Very truly yours, |
|
|
/s/ J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES
INC.
|
|
|
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC.
|
B-2
ANNEX C
March 6, 2005
Board of Directors
United Defense Industries, Inc.
1525 Wilson Boulevard
Suite 700
Arlington, VA 22209
Members of the Board:
We understand that United Defense Industries, Inc.
(UDI or the Company) intends to enter
into a transaction (the Proposed Transaction) with
BAE Systems North America Inc. (Buyer), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of BAE Systems plc (Brother)
whereby (i) Ute Acquisition Company Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Buyer (Merger Sub) will merge with and
into the Company, and (ii) upon the effectiveness of such
merger, each share of UDI common stock will be converted into
the right to receive $75.00 in cash. The terms and conditions of
the Proposed Transaction are set forth in more detail in the
Merger Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2005, among Buyer,
Merger Sub and the Company (the Agreement).
We have been requested by the Board of Directors of the Company
to render our opinion with respect to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the Companys stockholders of
the consideration to be received by such stockholders in the
Proposed Transaction. We have not been requested to opine as to,
and our opinion does not in any manner address, the
Companys underlying business decision to proceed with or
effect the Proposed Transaction.
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed and
analyzed: (1) the Agreement and the specific terms of
the Proposed Transaction, including the necessary regulatory
approvals, (2) publicly available information concerning
the Company that we believe to be relevant to our analysis,
including, the Companys earnings announcement for the
fiscal year 2004 that was filed on Form 8-K on
January 27, 2005, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004,
(3) financial and operating information with respect to the
business, operations and prospects of the Company furnished to
us by the Company, including a draft of the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-K), which
we understand that the Company intends to file with the SEC, on
or about March 9, 2005, (4) a trading history of UDI
common stock from its commencement of trading on the NYSE on
December 14, 2001 to March 4, 2005 and a comparison of
that trading history with those of other companies that we
deemed relevant, (5) a comparison of the historical
financial results and present financial condition of the Company
with those of other companies that we deemed relevant,
(6) a comparison of the financial terms of the Proposed
Transaction with the financial terms of certain other recent
transactions that we deemed relevant, (7) independent
research analysts estimates of the future financial
performance of the Company published by The Institutional
Brokers Estimate System (I/B/E/S) and (8) the
results of the efforts by the Company, us and the Companys
other financial advisor to solicit indications of interest from
third parties with respect to a sale of the Company. In
addition, we have had discussions with the management of the
Company concerning its business, operations, assets, financial
condition and prospects and have undertaken such other studies,
analyses and investigations as we deemed appropriate.
In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information
used by us without assuming any responsibility for independent
verification of such information and have further relied upon
the assurances of management of the Company that they are not
aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such
information inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the
financial projections of the Company, upon advice of the Company
we have assumed that such projections have been reasonably
prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available
C-1
estimates and judgments of the management of the Company as to
the future financial performance of the Company and that the
Company will perform substantially in accordance with such
projections. We have also assumed that the definitive
Form 10-K will not differ in any material respect from the
draft thereof furnished to us. In arriving at our opinion, we
have not conducted a physical inspection of the properties and
facilities of the Company and have not made or obtained any
evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities of the
Company. Our opinion necessarily is based upon market, economic
and other conditions as they exist on, and can be evaluated as
of, the date of this letter.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
as of the date hereof that, from a financial point of view, the
consideration to be received by the shareholders in the Proposed
Transaction is fair to the stockholders of the Company.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company in connection
with the Proposed Transaction and will receive a fee for our
services which is contingent upon the consummation of the
Proposed Transaction. In addition, the Company has agreed to
indemnify us for certain liabilities that may arise out of the
rendering of this opinion. We also have performed various
investment banking services for the Company in the past and have
received customary fees for such services. In addition, we
offered to provide financing to another bidder for the Company
in order to assist in their bid for the Company. In the ordinary
course of our business, we actively trade in the debt and equity
securities of the Company and Buyer for our own account and for
the accounts of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time
hold a long or short position in such securities.
This opinion is for the use and benefit of the Board of
Directors of the Company and is rendered to the Board of
Directors in connection with its consideration of the Proposed
Transaction. This opinion is not intended to be and does not
constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of the Company as
to how such stockholder should vote with respect to the Proposed
Transaction.
|
|
|
Very truly yours, |
|
|
LEHMAN BROTHERS
|
C-2
ANNEX D
DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
SECTION 262
§ 262. Appraisal rights
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who
holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand
pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with
respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares
through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who
has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this
section and who has neither voted in favor of the merger or
consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to
§ 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal
by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the
stockholders shares of stock under the circumstances
described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section.
As used in this section, the word stockholder means
a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation and also a
member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words
stock and share mean and include what is
ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or
membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and
the words depository receipt mean a receipt or other
instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in
one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a
corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of
any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a
merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to
§ 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to
§ 251(g) of this title), § 252,
§ 254, § 257, § 258,
§ 263 or § 264 of this title:
|
|
|
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this
section shall be available for the shares of any class or series
of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect
thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders
entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting of
stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or
consolidation, were either (i) listed on a national
securities exchange or designated as a national market system
security on an interdealer quotation system by the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or (ii) held of
record by more than 2,000 holders; and further provided that no
appraisal rights shall be available for any shares of stock of
the constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did
not require for its approval the vote of the stockholders of the
surviving corporation as provided in subsection (f) of
§ 251 of this title. |
|
|
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this
subsection, appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a
constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required by
the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to
§§ 251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this
title to accept for such stock anything except: |
|
|
|
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or
resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof; |
|
|
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or
depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts
at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be
either listed on a national securities exchange or designated as
a national market system security on an interdealer quotation
system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
or held of record by more than 2,000 holders; |
|
|
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.
and b. of this paragraph; or |
|
|
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository
receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.,
b. and c. of this paragraph. |
D-1
|
|
|
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware
corporation party to a merger effected under § 253 of
this title is not owned by the parent corporation immediately
prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the
shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation. |
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of
incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as
a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation,
any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a
constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all
of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of
incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this
section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and
(e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is
practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
|
|
|
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which
appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be
submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the
corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting,
shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record
date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal
rights are available pursuant to subsection (b) or
(c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any or
all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall
include in such notice a copy of this section. Each stockholder
electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of
the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for
appraisal of such stockholders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation
shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to
take such action must do so by a separate written demand as
herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of
such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting
corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent
corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not
voted in favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of
the date that the merger or consolidation has become
effective; or |
|
|
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to
§ 228 or § 253 of this title, then either a
constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger
or consolidation or the surviving or resulting corporation
within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders
of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation
who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the
merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available
for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such
constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy
of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also
notify such stockholders of the effective date of the merger or
consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may,
within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice,
demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation
the appraisal of such holders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such holders shares. If
such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such
constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the
effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of
the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent
corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the
effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the
surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second
notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such
effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is
sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first
notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder
who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded
appraisal of such holders shares in accordance with this
subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary
or of the transfer agent of the corporation that is required to
give either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the
absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated
therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled
to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix,
in advance, a record date that shall be not more than
10 days prior to the date the notice is given, |
D-2
|
|
|
provided, that if the notice is given on or after the effective
date of the merger or consolidation, the record date shall be
such effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice
is given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be
the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which
the notice is given. |
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation
or any stockholder who has complied with subsections
(a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to
appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery
demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such
stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within
60 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any stockholder shall have the right to withdraw
such stockholders demand for appraisal and to accept the
terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within
120 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the
requirements of subsections (a) and (d) hereof, upon
written request, shall be entitled to receive from the
corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the
consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of
shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and
with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received
and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written
statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days
after such stockholders written request for such a
statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation
or within 10 days after expiration of the period for
delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d)
hereof, whichever is later.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder,
service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or
resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after
such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in
which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded
payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the
value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or
resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in
Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the
time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by
registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting
corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the
addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1
or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the
hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court
deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by
publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs
thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall
determine the stockholders who have complied with this section
and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may
require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for
their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery
for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal
proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such
direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such
stockholder.
(h) After determining the stockholders entitled to an
appraisal, the Court shall appraise the shares, determining
their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from
the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or
consolidation, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to
be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In
determining such fair value, the Court shall take into account
all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate of interest,
the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate
of interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would
have had to pay to borrow money during the pendency of the
proceeding. Upon application by the surviving or resulting
corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the
appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, permit
discovery or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial
upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the
stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name
appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting
corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section
and who has submitted such stockholders certificates of
stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may
D-3
participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally
determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal
rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of
the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or
resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto.
Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court may direct.
Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case
of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of
holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender
to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock.
The Courts decree may be enforced as other decrees in the
Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or
resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any
state.
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the
Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in
the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court
may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any
stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata
against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights
as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be
entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive
payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of
record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the
merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition
for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in
subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder
shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a
written withdrawal of such stockholders demand for an
appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation,
either within 60 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation as provided in
subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the
written approval of the corporation, then the right of such
stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery
shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of
the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms
as the Court deems just.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to
which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been
converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall
have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the
surviving or resulting corporation.
D-4
ANNEX E
Audit and Ethics Committee Charter
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Audit and Ethics Committee (the
Committee) is to provide assistance to the Board of
Directors (the Board) of United Defense Industries,
Inc. (the Company) in fulfilling the Boards
oversight responsibilities regarding the Companys
accounting and system of internal controls, the quality and
integrity of the Companys financial reports, the
independence and performance of the Companys outside
auditor, and the operation of the Companys ethics program.
In so doing, the Committee should endeavor to maintain free and
open means of communication between the members of the Committee
other members of the Board, the outside auditor and the
financial management of the Company.
The Committees audit-related responsibility is to oversee
the Companys financial reporting process on behalf of the
Board and report the results of their activities in this respect
to the Board. Management of the Company has the responsibility
for the Companys financial statements as well as the
Companys financial reporting process, principles and
internal controls. The outside auditor is responsible for
performing an audit of the Companys annual financial
statements, expressing an opinion as to the conformity of such
annual financial statements with generally accepted accounting
principles, reviewing the Companys quarterly financial
statements and other procedures. It is recognized that the
members of the Committee are not engaged in the accounting or
auditing profession and, consequently, their level of expertise
in matters involving auditing or accounting including in respect
of auditor independence is more limited than that of the
Companys outside auditor. As such, it is not the duty of
the Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the
Companys financial statements fairly present the
Companys financial position and results of operation and
are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
and applicable laws and regulations. Each member of the
Committee shall be entitled to rely on (i) the integrity of
those persons within the Company and of the professionals and
experts (such as the outside auditor) from which it receives
information, (ii) the accuracy of the financial and other
information provided to the Committee by such persons,
professionals or experts absent actual knowledge to the contrary
and (iii) representations made by management or the outside
auditor as to any non-audit services provided by the outside
auditor to the Company.
The Committees ethics-related responsibility is to oversee
the Companys ethics program and report the results of
their activities in this respect to the Board. Management of the
Company has the responsibility to provide for the expression, by
employees regardless of rank or position description, of
concerns regarding potentially unlawful or unethical business
practices by the Company. The Committee shall oversee and assess
the operation of the Companys ethics program established
by management, including the articulation and communication of
standards of conduct, the maintenance of mechanisms for
reporting concerns in a manner protective of concerns regarding
retaliation, the selection of appropriate personnel to
administer the ethics program, the mechanisms by which ethics
issues raised by employees are addressed, and the implementation
of corrective action under appropriate circumstances.
MEMBERSHIP
The Committee shall consist of three members of the Board. The
members shall be appointed by action of the Board and shall
serve for one year terms, or until their successors shall be
duly elected and qualified. Each Committee member shall be
financially literate as determined by the Board in
its business judgment and shall satisfy the
independence requirements of the New York Stock
Exchange and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act) Rule 10A-3(b)(1). No Committee member may
simultaneously serve on the audit committee of more than two
other public companies, unless the Board determines that such
simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such member
to effectively serve on the Committee and such determination is
disclosed in the Companys annual proxy statement. At least
one member of the Committee shall have accounting or
related financial management expertise, as determined by
the Board in its business judgment. In addition, either at least
one member of
E-1
the Committee shall be an audit committee financial
expert within the definition adopted by the SEC or the
Company shall disclose in its periodic reports required pursuant
to the Exchange Act the reasons why at least one member of the
Committee is not an audit committee financial expert.
COMMITTEE ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES
1. Unless a Chair is elected by the full Board, the members
of the Committee shall appoint a Chair of the Committee by
majority vote of the full Committee. The Chair (or in his or her
absence, a member designated by the Chair) shall preside at all
meetings of the Committee.
2. The Committee shall have the authority to establish its
own rules and procedures consistent with the bylaws of the
Company for notice and conduct of its meetings, should the
Committee, in its discretion, deem it desirable to do so.
3. The Committee shall meet four times in each fiscal year,
and more frequently as the Committee in its discretion deems
desirable. The Committee shall meet separately, periodically,
with management, with the internal auditor and with the
independent auditor.
4. The Committee may, in its discretion, include in its
meetings members of the Companys financial management,
representatives of the outside auditor, the senior internal
audit manager, and other financial personnel employed or
retained by the Company. The Committee may meet with the outside
auditor or the senior internal audit manager in separate
executive sessions to discuss any matters that the Committee
believes should be addressed privately, without
managements presence. The Committee may likewise meet
privately with management, as it deems appropriate.
5. The Committee may, in its discretion, utilize the
services of the Companys regular corporate legal counsel
with respect to legal matters or, at its discretion, retain
other legal counsel if it determines that such counsel is
necessary or appropriate under the circumstances. The Committee
may also retain any independent experts or advisors (accounting,
financial or otherwise) that the Committee believes to be
necessary or appropriate. The Company shall provide for
appropriate funding, as determined by the Committee, for payment
of compensation to the independent auditor for the purpose of
rendering or issuing an audit report and to any advisors
employed by the Committee.
6. The Committee may, in its discretion, include in its
meetings the director of the Companys ethics program,
subordinates of the ethics director, and such other members of
the Companys management as the Committee may deem
appropriate. The Committee may meet with any of the
Companys ethics program personnel in a separate executive
session to discuss any matters that the Committee believes
should be addressed privately without managements presence.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Outside Auditor
7. The Committee shall be directly responsible and have
sole authority for the appointment, compensation, retention and
oversight of the work of the independent auditor (including
resolution of any disagreements between Company management and
the independent auditor regarding financial reporting) for the
purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work
or performing other audit, review or attest services for the
Company, and the independent auditor shall report directly to
the Committee.
8. Before the independent auditor is engaged to render
audit or non-audit services to the Company or its subsidiaries,
the Committee shall approve the engagement. Committee approval
of audit and non-audit services will not be required if the
engagement for the services is entered into pursuant to
pre-approval policies and procedures established by the
Committee regarding the Companys engagement of the
independent auditor, provided the policies and procedures are
detailed as to the particular service, the Committee is informed
of each service provided, and such policies and procedures do
not include delegation of the Committees responsibilities
under the Exchange Act to the Companys management. The
Committee may delegate to one or more designated members of the
Committee the authority to grant pre-approvals, provided such
approvals are presented to the Committee at a subsequent
meeting. If the Committee elects to establish pre-approval
policies and procedures regarding non-audit services, the
E-2
Committee must be informed of each non-audit service provided by
the independent auditor. Committee pre-approval of non-audit
services (other than review and attest services) also will not
be required if such services fall within available exceptions
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC).
9. The Committee shall, at least annually, review the
independence and quality control procedures of the independent
auditor and the experience and qualifications of the independent
auditors senior personnel that are providing audit
services to the Company. In conducting its review:
|
|
|
(i) The Committee shall obtain and review a report prepared
by the independent auditor describing (a) the auditing
firms internal quality-control procedures and (b) any
material issues raised by the most recent internal
quality-control review, or peer review, of the auditing firm, or
by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional
authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting one or
more independent audits carried out by the auditing firm, and
any steps taken to deal with any such issues. |
|
|
(ii) The Committee shall discuss with the independent
auditor its independence from the Company, and obtain and review
a written statement prepared by the independent auditor
describing all relationships between the independent auditor and
the Company, consistent with Independence Standards Board
Standard 1, and consider the impact that any relationships
or services may have on the objectivity and independence of the
independent auditor. |
|
|
(iii) The Committee shall confirm with the independent
auditor that the independent auditor is in compliance with the
partner rotation requirements established by the SEC. |
|
|
(iv) The Committee shall consider whether the Company
should adopt a rotation of the annual audit among independent
auditing firms. |
|
|
(v) The Committee shall, if applicable, consider whether
the independent auditors provision of any permitted
information technology services or other non-audit services to
the Company is compatible with maintaining the independence of
the independent auditor. |
Annual Audit
10. The Committee shall meet with the outside auditor and
management of the Company in connection with each annual audit
to discuss the scope of the audit and the procedures to be
followed.
11. The Committee shall meet with the outside auditor and
management prior to the public release of the financial results
of operations for the year under audit and discuss with the
outside auditor any matters within the scope of the pending
audit that have not yet been completed.
12. The Committee shall review and discuss with management
and the independent auditor: (A) major issues
regarding accounting principles and financial statement
presentation, including any significant changes in the
Companys selection or application of accounting
principles, and major issues as to the adequacy of the
Companys internal controls and any special audit steps
adopted in light of material control deficiencies; (B) any
analyses prepared by management or the independent auditor
setting forth significant financial reporting issues and
judgments made in connection with the preparation of the
Companys financial statements, including analyses of the
effects of alternative GAAP methods on the Companys
financial statements; and (C) the effect of regulatory and
accounting initiatives, as well as off-balance sheet structures,
on the Companys financial statements.
13. The Committee shall review and discuss the audited
financial statements with the management of the Company.
14. The Committee shall discuss with the outside auditor
the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 61 as then in effect including, among others,
(i) the methods used to account for any significant unusual
transactions reflected in the audited financial statements;
(ii) the effect of significant accounting policies in any
controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack of
authoritative guidance or a consensus to be followed by the
outside auditor; (iii) the process used by management in
formulating particularly sensitive accounting estimates and the
basis for the auditors
E-3
conclusions regarding the reasonableness of those estimates; and
(iv) any disagreements with management over the application
of accounting principles, the basis for managements
accounting estimates or the disclosures in the financial
statements.
15. The Committee shall, based on the review and
discussions in paragraphs 13 and 14 above, and based on the
disclosures received from the outside auditor regarding its
independence and discussions with the auditor regarding such
independence in paragraph 9 above, recommend to the Board
whether the audited financial statements should be included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year subject to the audit.
Quarterly Review
16. The outside auditor is required to review the interim
financial statements to be included in any Form 10-Q Report
by the Company using professional standards and procedures for
conducting such reviews, as established by generally accepted
auditing standards as modified or supplemented by the Securities
and Exchange Commission, prior to the filing of such
Form 10-Q. The Committee shall discuss with management and
the outside auditor in person, at a meeting, or by conference
telephone call, the results of the quarterly review including
such matters as significant adjustments, management judgments,
accounting estimates, significant new accounting policies and
disagreements with management. The Chair may represent the
entire Committee for purposes of this discussion.
Internal Controls
17. The Committee shall discuss with the outside auditor
and the senior internal audit manager, at least annually, the
adequacy and effectiveness of the accounting and financial
controls of the Company, and consider any recommendations for
improvement of such internal control procedures.
18. The Committee shall discuss with the outside auditor
and with management any management letter provided by the
outside auditor and any other significant matters brought to the
attention of the Committee by the outside auditor as a result of
its annual audit. The Committee should allow management adequate
time to consider any such matters raised by the outside auditor.
Internal Audit
19. The Committee shall discuss at least annually with the
senior internal audit manager the activities and organizational
structure of the Companys internal audit function and the
qualifications of the primary personnel performing such function.
20. Management shall furnish to the Committee a copy of
each audit report prepared by the senior internal audit manager
of the Company.
21. The Committee shall, at its discretion, meet with the
senior internal audit manager to discuss any reports prepared by
him or her or any other matters brought to the attention of the
Committee by the senior internal auditor manager.
22. The senior internal audit manager shall be granted
unfettered access to the Committee.
Other Responsibilities
23. The Committee shall review and reassess the
Committees charter at least annually and submit any
recommended changes to the Board for its consideration.
24. The Committee shall provide the report for inclusion in
the Companys Annual Proxy Statement required by
Item 306 of Regulation S-K of the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
25. The Committee shall discuss with management the
Companys policies with respect to risk assessment and risk
management. The Committee shall discuss with management the
Companys significant financial risk exposures and the
actions management has taken to limit, monitor or control such
exposures.
26. The Committee shall set clear hiring policies for
employees or former employees of the Companys independent
auditor.
E-4
27. The Committee shall establish procedures for the
receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the
Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or
auditing matters. The Committee shall also establish procedures
for the confidential and anonymous submission by employees
regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
28. The Committee shall at least annually perform an
evaluation of the performance of the Committee and its members,
including a review of the Committees compliance with this
Charter.
29. The Committee, through its Chair, shall report
periodically, as deemed necessary or desirable by the Committee,
but at least annually, to the full Board regarding any issues
that arise with respect to the quality or integrity of the
Companys financial statements, the Companys
compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, the
performance and independence of the Companys independent
auditor, the performance of the Companys internal audit
function or any other matter the Committee determines is
necessary or advisable to report to the Board.
30. The Committee shall discuss with management and the
independent auditor the Companys earnings press releases
(with particular focus on any pro forma or
adjusted non-GAAP information), as well as financial
information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and
rating agencies. The Committees discussion in this regard
may be general in nature (i.e., discussion of the types of
information to be disclosed and the type of presentation to be
made) and need not take place in advance of each earnings
release or each instance in which the Company may provide
earnings guidance.
Revised December 1, 2004
E-5
UNITED DEFENSE INDUSTRIES, INC.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON
MAY 10, 2005 AT 11:00 A.M. LOCAL TIME
The undersigned holder of common stock, par value $0.01, of United Defense Industries, Inc.
(the Company) hereby appoints Francis Raborn and David V.
Kolovat, or either of them, proxies for
the undersigned, each with full power of substitution, to represent and to vote as specified in
this proxy all common stock of the Company that the undersigned stockholder would be entitled to
vote if present in person at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) to be held
on May 10, 2005 at 11:00 a.m. local time at the Hyatt Regency Capital City, 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202, and at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual
Meeting. The undersigned stockholder hereby revokes any proxy or proxies heretofore executed for
such matters.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the
undersigned stockholder. If no direction is given, this proxy will be voted FOR each of the
proposals and in the discretion of the proxies as to any other matters that may properly come
before the Annual Meeting. The undersigned stockholder may revoke this proxy at any time before it
is voted by delivering to the Secretary of the Company either a written revocation of the proxy or
a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by appearing at the Annual Meeting and voting in
person.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSALS.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE PREPAID
ENVELOPE.
(SEE REVERSE SIDE)
(REVERSE)
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
UNITED DEFENSE INDUSTRIES, INC.
May 10, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
|
|
Please mark votes as in this example. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Each Proposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 6, 2005, among the
Company, BAE Systems North America Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Ute
Acquisition Company Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary
of BAE Systems North America Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o FOR o AGAINST o ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
Election of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
FOR all nominees listed below (except as marked to the contrary). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees:
|
|
Frank C. Carlucci; Peter J. Clare; William E. Conway, Jr.; C. Thomas Faulders, III; Robert J. Natter; J. H. Binford Peay, III; Thomas W. Rabaut;
Francis Raborn; John M. Shalikashvili. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(INSTRUCTIONS:
|
|
to withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark the FOR box and write that nominees name in the
space provided below.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
|
To grant discretionary authority to adjourn the Annual Meeting, if necessary,
for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o FOR o AGAINST o ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
|
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon
such other business as may properly come before the Annual
Meeting or any adjournment thereof. |
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and Proxy Statement in which the above proposals are
explained in detail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature (if held jointly):
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
Please date and sign exactly as your name(s) is (are) shown on the share certificate(s) to
which the proxy applies. When shares are held as joint-tenants, both should sign. When signing as
an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, attorney-in-fact, or other fiduciary, please give
full title as such. When signing as a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by the
President or other authorized officer. When signing as a partnership, please sign in partnership
name by an authorized person.