PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2006
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number:
000-19480
Per-Se Technologies,
Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
58-1651222
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1145 Sanctuary Parkway,
Suite 200
|
|
30004
|
Alpharetta, Georgia
|
|
(Zip code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
(770) 237-4300
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Not
Applicable
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since
last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares of stock outstanding of each of
the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date.
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Shares Outstanding at October 31, 2006
|
|
Common Stock $0.01 Par Value
|
|
39,227,739 shares
|
Non-voting Common Stock
$0.01 Par Value
|
|
0 shares
|
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2006
1
PART I:
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
par value data)
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
52,453
|
|
|
$
|
61,161
|
|
Accounts receivable (less
allowances of $5,731 and $3,348 as of September 30, 2006,
and December 31, 2005, respectively)
|
|
|
96,768
|
|
|
|
54,397
|
|
Deferred income taxes
current, net
|
|
|
4,507
|
|
|
|
4,056
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
13,004
|
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,541
|
|
|
|
3,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
174,273
|
|
|
|
126,173
|
|
Property and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
40,726
|
|
|
|
16,843
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
380,656
|
|
|
|
38,199
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
298,496
|
|
|
|
21,946
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
29,151
|
|
|
|
26,238
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18,036
|
|
|
|
10,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
941,338
|
|
|
$
|
239,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
10,625
|
|
|
$
|
5,982
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
23,573
|
|
|
|
15,265
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
17,002
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Deferred revenue
current
|
|
|
41,077
|
|
|
|
25,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
128,702
|
|
|
|
64,205
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease
obligations
|
|
|
510,411
|
|
|
|
125,490
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
8,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other obligations
|
|
|
21,419
|
|
|
|
5,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
669,210
|
|
|
|
195,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value,
20,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, voting,
$0.01 par value, 200,000 shares authorized, 42,187 and
33,511 issued and 39,199 and 30,523 outstanding as of
September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, respectively
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
Common stock, non-voting,
$0.01 par value, 600 shares authorized; none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,025,730
|
|
|
|
804,875
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(713,784
|
)
|
|
|
(719,759
|
)
|
Treasury stock at cost,
2,988 shares as of September 30, 2006, and
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(41,912
|
)
|
|
|
(41,817
|
)
|
Deferred stock unit plan obligation
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
272,128
|
|
|
|
44,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
941,338
|
|
|
$
|
239,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
148,871
|
|
|
$
|
94,006
|
|
|
$
|
447,785
|
|
|
$
|
279,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
86,007
|
|
|
|
63,089
|
|
|
|
274,358
|
|
|
|
185,596
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
41,514
|
|
|
|
19,918
|
|
|
|
130,504
|
|
|
|
63,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
21,350
|
|
|
|
10,999
|
|
|
|
42,923
|
|
|
|
30,708
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,925
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
4,360
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(1,649
|
)
|
|
|
(1,075
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes
|
|
|
12,960
|
|
|
|
9,995
|
|
|
|
18,572
|
|
|
|
27,423
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
5,984
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
12,305
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
6,976
|
|
|
|
9,823
|
|
|
|
6,267
|
|
|
|
26,800
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6,758
|
|
|
$
|
9,823
|
|
|
$
|
5,975
|
|
|
$
|
26,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common
share basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common
share basic
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in
computing basic earnings per share
|
|
|
39,134
|
|
|
|
29,994
|
|
|
|
38,861
|
|
|
|
30,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common
share diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common
share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in
computing diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
43,203
|
|
|
|
33,792
|
|
|
|
43,535
|
|
|
|
32,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,975
|
|
|
$
|
26,800
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
49,310
|
|
|
|
11,233
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
4,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing
costs
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
11,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities,
excluding effects of acquisitions and divestitures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(6,645
|
)
|
|
|
(7,067
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,918
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
1,909
|
|
|
|
3,957
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(28,856
|
)
|
|
|
(2,024
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
19,908
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
|
|
(1,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing
operations
|
|
|
60,856
|
|
|
|
35,537
|
|
Net cash used for discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
60,372
|
|
|
|
35,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(429,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(8,802
|
)
|
|
|
(6,098
|
)
|
Software development costs
|
|
|
(12,540
|
)
|
|
|
(4,544
|
)
|
Capitalized acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,484
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(451,176
|
)
|
|
|
(12,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,404
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
4,312
|
|
|
|
5,967
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
435,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt
|
|
|
(50,202
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(7,662
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for)
financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
382,096
|
|
|
|
(9,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change
|
|
|
(8,708
|
)
|
|
|
13,708
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
61,161
|
|
|
|
42,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
52,453
|
|
|
$
|
56,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
23,415
|
|
|
$
|
2,387
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
11,001
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
Non-cash investing activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock issued in connection
with the acquisition of NDCHealth
|
|
$
|
197,915
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Note 1
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
(interim financial statements) include the accounts of Per-Se
Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Per-Se or
the Company). Intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated.
These interim financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP) for interim
financial information, the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim
financial statements, and accounting policies consistent, in all
material respects, with those applied in preparing the
Companys audited consolidated financial statements
included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on March 15, 2006 (2005
Form 10-K).
These interim financial statements are unaudited but reflect all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)
management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the
Companys financial position, operating results and cash
flows for the interim periods presented. The information
included in this report should be read in conjunction with the
2005
Form 10-K.
As discussed in Note 3, the Company completed the
acquisition of NDCHealth Corporation (NDCHealth) on
January 6, 2006, and has included the financial results of
NDCHealth in its consolidated financial statements beginning
January 6, 2006.
Note 2
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123(R)), which is a revision
of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS No. 123).
SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB No. 25), and
amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.
The original effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) was for
interim periods beginning after June 15, 2005.
On April 14, 2005, the SEC announced the adoption of a rule
that amended the compliance date for SFAS No. 123(R).
The Company was required to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) no
later than January 1, 2006.
SFAS No. 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its
requirements using one of two methods:
|
|
|
|
|
A modified prospective method in which compensation
cost is recognized beginning with the effective date
(a) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R)
for all share-based payments granted after the effective date,
and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123
for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date
of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the
effective date.
|
|
|
|
A modified retrospective method which includes the
requirements of the modified prospective method described above,
but also permits entities to restate based on the amounts
previously recognized under SFAS No. 123 for purposes
of pro forma disclosures either (a) all periods presented
or (b) prior interim periods of the year of adoption.
|
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method
described above. The Companys consolidated financial
statements as of and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, reflect the impact of
SFAS No. 123(R). In accordance with the modified
prospective method, the Companys consolidated financial
statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect,
and do not include, the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).
SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to estimate the
fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant
using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the
award that is ultimately expected to vest is
5
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the
requisite service period in the Companys consolidated
financial statements. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based
awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value
method in accordance with APB No. 25 as allowed under
SFAS No. 123. Under the intrinsic value method, no
stock-based compensation expense was recognized in the
Companys consolidated statements of operations for stock
options because the exercise price of the Companys stock
options granted to employees and directors equaled or exceeded
the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of
grant. However, the Company previously disclosed the effect on
net income and net income per share if the Company had applied
the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123
to its stock-based compensation plans in its prior period
financial statement footnotes.
As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
accompanying unaudited consolidated statement of operations for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, is
based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced
for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) requires
forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if
necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on
historical experience and managements estimates. In the
Companys pro forma information required under
SFAS No. 123 for the periods prior to fiscal year
2006, the Company accounted for stock option forfeitures as they
occurred.
The following table shows the effect of the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006, on selected
line items in the accompanying financial statements for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(950
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,363
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(591
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,071
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(591
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,071
|
)
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net
income per share if the Company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2005 (in thousands,
except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
Net income as reported
|
|
$
|
9,823
|
|
|
$
|
26,800
|
|
Deduct: total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
(3,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
8,735
|
|
|
$
|
23,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Stock
Option Plans
The Company has three stock option plans for employees:
(i) the Second Amended and Restated Per-Se Technologies,
Inc. Stock Option Plan, as amended; (ii) the Per-Se
Technologies, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for
Non-Executive Employees, as amended; and (iii) the Per-Se
Technologies, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for Employees
of Acquired Companies, as amended. Options under all of these
plans are granted at an exercise price equal to or in excess of
the fair market value of the Companys Common Stock on the
date of grant. Such options generally vest over a
three-to-five
year period and expire eleven years after the date of grant. The
total number of options available for future grants under these
stock option plans was 3,790 at September 30, 2006
(excluding 345,952 shares under the Per-Se Technologies,
Inc. Non- Qualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Executive
Employees, as amended, from which the Compensation Committee of
the Companys Board of Directors has resolved no further
grants shall be made).
The Company also has one stock option plan for non-employees who
serve on the Companys Board of Directors. This plan, the
Amended and Restated Per-Se Technologies, Inc. Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan, provides for an initial grant of
10,000 stock options upon first election or appointment to the
Board and an annual grant of 10,000 stock options for each year
of service thereafter. Options under this plan are granted at an
exercise price equal to the average of the fair market values of
the Companys Common Stock for the five trading days prior
to the date of the grant. Such options are generally fully
vested as of the date of grant but not exercisable until one
year after the date of grant and expire ten years after the date
of grant. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had 58,539
options available for future grants under this plan.
Activity related to all stock option plans as of
September 30, 2006, and for the nine months then ended is
summarized as follows (shares and aggregate intrinsic value in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
January 1
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
|
$
|
10.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
$
|
26.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
September 30
|
|
|
5,555
|
|
|
$
|
12.69
|
|
|
|
6.64 years
|
|
|
$
|
56,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable as of
September 30
|
|
|
4,066
|
|
|
$
|
10.23
|
|
|
|
5.65 years
|
|
|
$
|
51,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to
vest as of September 30
|
|
|
5,257
|
|
|
$
|
12.31
|
|
|
|
6.49 years
|
|
|
$
|
55,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, and 2005, was
$5.9 million and $7.0 million, respectively. The
Companys policy for issuing shares upon share option
exercise is to issue new shares of Common Stock.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of each option
granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
and 2005, was $9.50 and $6.81, respectively.
7
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of each option grant
is estimated on the date of the grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model based on the following
weighted average assumptions for grants during the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
4.57
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Dividend rate
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
46.8
|
%
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the
price of the Companys stock. The Company uses historical
information to estimate expected life and forfeitures within the
valuation model. The expected term of awards represents the
period of time that options granted are expected to be
outstanding. The risk-free interest rate is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve for issues with a remaining term
approximating the expected term. Compensation cost is recognized
using a straight-line method over the vesting or service period
and is net of estimated forfeitures.
The compensation cost and related tax benefit associated with
stock option grants was $1.0 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, during the three months ended September 30,
2006, and $3.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively,
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. As of
September 30, 2006, there was approximately
$6.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options. This cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
Long
Term Incentive Plan
On May 25, 2006, the stockholders of the Company approved
the Per-Se Technologies, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
2006 LTIP). A total of 1.5 million shares of
the Companys Common Stock are reserved and available for
issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2006 LTIP. The
2006 LTIP authorizes the granting of awards in the form of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted
or deferred stock units, performance awards, dividend
equivalents, performance-based cash awards, and other
stock-based awards to the Companys employees, officers,
directors and consultants. As of September 30, 2006, the
Company had approximately 1.1 million shares available for
future grants under this plan.
On June 6, 2006, two types of restricted stock units were
granted under the 2006 LTIP: performance-based restricted stock
units and service-based restricted stock units. The
performance-based restricted stock units represent the right to
earn, on a
one-for-one
basis, a target number of shares of the Companys Common
Stock, provided that the grantee remains continuously employed
by the Company during the performance period. The
performance-based restricted stock agreements contain a
market-based condition that determines the number of shares
earned. This market-based condition stipulates that the
Companys performance be measured against the attainment of
specified targets for total shareholder return for the three
year period ending December 31, 2008. Based on the result
of this measurement, the number of shares earned can vary from
0% to 200% of the target number of shares. The service-based
restricted stock units represent the right to receive, on a
one-for-one
basis, a fixed number of shares of the Companys Common
Stock on the third anniversary of the grant date, provided that
the grantee remains continuously employed by the Company during
the vesting period.
8
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Performance-based restricted stock units. The
following is a summary of the activity relating to
performance-based restricted stock units since the inception of
the 2006 LTIP (units in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Nonvested units as of Plan
inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
256.1
|
|
|
|
31.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
31.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested units as of
September 30
|
|
|
255.2
|
|
|
$
|
31.57
|
|
|
|
2.3 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of each
performance-based restricted stock unit granted during the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, was estimated on the date
of the grant using the Monte-Carlo simulation model based on the
following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Market value of the Companys
Common Stock on the grant date
|
|
$
|
25.53
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Dividend rate
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
40.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the
price of the Companys stock. The risk-free interest rate
is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve for issues with a
remaining term approximating the expected term.
Compensation cost for performance-based restricted stock units
is recognized using the straight-line method over the
31-month
period from the date of grant through the end of the three-year
performance period, or December 31, 2008, and is net of
estimated forfeitures. Future adjustments to the amount of
expense recognized relating to these awards will only result
from changes in the Companys forfeiture assumption. The
Company uses historical information to estimate forfeitures.
The compensation cost and related tax benefit associated with
performance-based restricted stock units was $0.6 million
and $0.2 million, respectively, during the three months
ended September 30, 2006, and $0.8 million and
$0.3 million, respectively, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. At September 30, 2006, the
unamortized compensation cost related to performance-based
restricted stock units totaled $5.6 million, which will be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
Service-based restricted stock units. The
following is a summary of the activity relating to service-based
restricted stock units since the inception of the Plan (units in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Nonvested units as of Plan
inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
144.6
|
|
|
|
25.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
25.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested units as of
September 30
|
|
|
144.0
|
|
|
$
|
25.53
|
|
|
|
2.7 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of the service-based
restricted stock units was based on the quoted fair market value
of the Companys Common Stock on the date of the grant.
9
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Compensation cost for service-based restricted stock units is
recognized using the straight-line method over the three-year
vesting period and is net of estimated forfeitures. The Company
uses historical information to estimate forfeitures.
The compensation cost and related tax benefit associated with
service-based restricted stock was $0.2 million and
$0.1 million, respectively, during the three months ended
September 30, 2006, and $0.3 million and
$0.1 million, respectively, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. At September 30, 2006, the
unamortized compensation cost related to service-based
restricted stock units totaled $2.6 million, which will be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
Note 3
Acquisitions
The Company completed the acquisition of NDCHealth on
January 6, 2006.
Pursuant to the Companys Agreement and Plan of Merger with
NDCHealth, a Delaware corporation, dated August 26, 2005,
the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of
NDCHealth for $19.50 per share ($14.05 in cash and $5.45 in
stock) as of January 6, 2006 (Acquisition
Date). The Company has included the financial results of
NDCHealth in its consolidated financial statements beginning
January 6, 2006.
The purchase of NDCHealth provided the Company with
complementary technology solutions and services, an expanded
customer base and entry into the Pharmacy market, which is a new
market for Per-Se.
The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business
combination. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were
recorded at their fair values as of January 6, 2006. The
total purchase price was $727.8 million, and was comprised
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash paid to NDCHealth Stockholders
|
|
$
|
515,996
|
|
Fair value of Per-Se Common Stock
issued
|
|
|
197,915
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
13,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
727,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition, the Company issued
approximately 8.3 million shares of its common stock to
NDCHealth stockholders. The fair value of Per-Se Common Stock
was determined for accounting purposes using an average price of
$23.95 per share, which represented the average closing
price of the Companys Common Stock, over a four day period
inclusive of the measurement date of the acquisition. The
measurement date of the acquisition for accounting purposes was
three days prior to the Acquisition Date.
Acquisition-related transaction costs include investment
banking, legal and accounting fees, and other external costs
directly related to the acquisition.
Preliminary
Purchase Price Allocation
Under purchase accounting, the total purchase price was
allocated to NDCHealths net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of
January 6, 2006, as set forth below. The excess of the
purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible
assets was recorded as goodwill. The preliminary allocation of
the purchase price was based upon a valuation. The
Companys estimates and assumptions underlying the
valuation are subject to change. The primary areas of the
purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized relate to
restructuring costs, certain legal matters, income and
non-income based taxes, deferred income taxes and residual
goodwill.
10
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
During the second and third quarters of 2006, the Company
recorded certain adjustments to the preliminary purchase price
allocation. These adjustments primarily related to accounts
receivable, other current assets, and accrued expenses and
resulted in a net decrease in goodwill of approximately
$1.8 million.
The following table details the purchase price allocation as of
September 30, 2006, including all adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
99,997
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
36,475
|
|
Deferred income tax asset
|
|
|
96,793
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
13,064
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
25,102
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
289,400
|
|
Goodwill Physician
Solutions
|
|
|
81,050
|
|
Goodwill Hospital
Solutions
|
|
|
174,022
|
|
Goodwill Pharmacy
Solutions
|
|
|
87,361
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
8,229
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
13,300
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(7,686
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(54,106
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
(6,287
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(3,643
|
)
|
Accrued restructuring and merger
costs
|
|
|
(11,135
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(96,793
|
)
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
(17,341
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
727,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Accounting for
Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141),
the Company was required to record acquired accounts receivable
at fair value. The Company recorded approximately
$36.5 million as the fair value of the acquired accounts
receivable based on NDCHealths gross accounts receivable
balance as of the acquisition date, less approximately
$7.0 million, which represented the allowance for doubtful
accounts on NDCHealths books at the date of acquisition.
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had a valuation
allowance against its deferred tax asset of $125.3 million
due to the uncertainty regarding its ability to generate
sufficient future taxable income prior to the expiration of its
net operating loss carryforwards. As a result of the acquisition
of NDCHealth, the Company released approximately
$84 million of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance
against the goodwill resulting from the transaction to offset a
deferred tax liability recorded as part of the acquisition. The
majority of this liability relates to the increase in the
valuation of NDCHealths fixed assets and identifiable
intangible assets resulting from the acquisition that were
recorded for GAAP. Since the NDCHealth acquisition was an
acquisition of stock, NDCHealths tax basis of the assets
carries over to the Company as its tax basis. Therefore, the
Company will not receive a tax benefit from the additional
intangible amortization recorded for GAAP purposes. As a result
of this accounting treatment for the acquisition, the
Companys taxable income relating to this acquisition will
be greater than its corresponding GAAP income, which will result
in the utilization of previously reserved net operating loss
carryforwards corresponding to the amount of the disallowed
amortization for income tax purposes. Since management believes
it is more likely than not that a portion of the Companys
deferred tax asset will be realized due to the recognition of a
deferred tax liability, the Company released a portion of its
valuation allowance against the asset.
11
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The Company estimates that approximately 36% of goodwill
acquired will be deductible for tax purposes. The deductible
goodwill will be amortized for tax purposes over the next
11 years.
Identifiable
Intangible Assets
In performing the purchase price allocation, the Company
considered, among other factors, the intended future use of
acquired assets, analyses of historical financial performance
and estimates of future performance of NDCHealths
products. The fair value of intangible assets was based, in
part, on a valuation completed using an income approach. The
rates utilized to discount net cash flows to their present
values were based on the Companys weighted average cost of
capital and ranged from 15% to 20%. These discount rates were
determined after consideration of the Companys rate of
return on debt and equity and the weighted average return on
invested capital. The following table sets forth the components
of intangible assets associated with the acquisition at
September 30, 2006 (in thousands, except years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Asset
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Customer lists and agreements
|
|
$
|
180,900
|
|
|
$
|
8,647
|
|
|
$
|
172,253
|
|
|
|
11 - 22 years
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
|
105,900
|
|
|
|
11,823
|
|
|
|
94,077
|
|
|
|
5 - 8 years
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
Noncompete agreements
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
289,400
|
|
|
$
|
20,939
|
|
|
$
|
268,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer lists, software support agreements and related
relationships represent the underlying relationships and
agreements with NDCHealths existing customers. Developed
technology represents the value assigned to the pharmacy
clearinghouse infrastructure as well as to the ePremis, Lytec
and Medisoft products. Trademarks represent the estimated fair
value of the Lytec and Medisoft trade names and trademarks.
Noncompete agreements represent the estimated fair value of
agreements with NDCHealths former management team members.
Intangible assets are being amortized using the straight-line
method.
In-Process
Research and Development
In-process research and development (IPR&D)
represents NDCHealths research and development projects
that had not reached a point where the product was available for
general release and had no alternative future use as of the
Acquisition Date. The value assigned to IPR&D was determined
by considering the importance of each project to the
Companys overall development plan, estimating costs to
develop the purchased IPR&D into commercially viable
products and estimating and discounting the net cash flows
resulting from the projects when completed. Purchased IPR&D
relates primarily to projects associated with NDCHealths
EnterpriseRx product ($8.6 million) and enhanced versions
of ePremis ($2.8 million) and Medisoft ($1.9 million)
products which had not yet reached general availability as of
the Acquisition Date and had no alternative future use.
IPR&D purchased in the acquisition of NDCHealth, which
totaled $13.3 million, was expensed in the first quarter of
2006 in accordance with SFAS No. 141.
Deferred
Revenue
In connection with the purchase price allocation, the Company
has estimated the fair value of the support obligation assumed
from NDCHealth in connection with the acquisition. The estimated
fair value of the support obligation and other future services
was determined utilizing a cost
build-up
approach. The cost
build-up
approach determines fair value by estimating the costs related
to fulfilling the obligation plus a normal profit margin. The
sum of the costs and operating profit approximates the amount
that the Company would be required to pay a third party to
assume the support obligation. The estimated costs to fulfill
the support obligation were based on the historical direct costs
related to providing the support services. The Company did not
include any costs associated with selling
12
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
efforts or research and development or the related fulfillment
margins on these costs. As a result, in allocating the
acquisition purchase price, the Company recorded an adjustment
to reduce the carrying value of NDCHealths January 6,
2006, deferred revenue by approximately $9.8 million to an
amount representing Per-Ses estimate of the fair value of
the support obligation assumed.
Accrued
Restructuring and Merger Costs
As a part of the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company formed a
plan to restructure the NDCHealth duplicative functions with the
Companys existing business functions. Consequently, the
Company included severance benefits of approximately
$10.4 million in the purchase price.
In addition, NDCHealth sold its Canadian pharmacy transaction
business in 2005. As part of this transaction, NDCHealth
abandoned its facility lease, which expires in 2009. Therefore,
the Company assumed a liability of $0.7 million in
connection with the sale of the Canadian pharmacy transaction
business, which represented the expected net cash outflows
associated with this lease.
These two amounts and the related payments made in the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 are set forth in the
following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Reserve balance, January 6,
2006
|
|
$
|
11,135
|
|
Cost applied against the reserve
|
|
|
(9,547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance,
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Acquisition
Contingencies
The Company has identified certain pre-acquisition
contingencies, but the fair values for such contingencies are
not yet determinable. If, during the purchase price allocation
period, the Company is able to determine the fair value of a
pre-acquisition contingency, the Company will include that
amount in the purchase price allocation. If, as of the end of
the purchase price allocation period, the fair value of a
pre-acquisition contingency is not determinable, the Company
will evaluate whether to include an amount in the purchase price
allocation based on whether it is probable that a liability had
been incurred and whether an amount can be reasonably estimated.
After the end of the purchase price allocation period, any
adjustment that results from a pre-acquisition contingency will
be included in the Companys operating results in the
period in which the adjustment is determined. The purchase price
allocation period ends when the Company has all of the
information that it has arranged to obtain and that is known to
be obtainable, but usually does not exceed one year from the
date of acquisition.
Pro
Forma Financial Information
The financial information in the table below summarizes the
combined results of operations of Per-Se and NDCHealth, on a pro
forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as of the
beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma financial
information is presented for informational purposes only and is
not indicative of the results of operations that would have been
achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of
the periods presented and assumes the disposition of
NDCHealths information management business prior to such
combination. Such pro forma financial information is based on
the historical financial statements of Per-Se and NDCHealth. In
determining such financial information, the combined historical
results of Per-Se and NDCHealth were adjusted to eliminate sales
and related costs of sales for NDCHealths information
management business and for normal business transactions between
Per-Se and NDCHealth. This pro forma financial information is
based on estimates and assumptions, which have been made solely
for purposes of developing such pro forma information,
including, without limitation, purchase accounting adjustments.
The pro forma financial information presented below also
includes depreciation and amortization based on the valuation of
NDCHealths tangible assets and
13
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
identifiable intangible assets resulting from the acquisition
and interest expense related to the debt issued to complete the
acquisition. The pro forma financial information does not
reflect any synergies or operating cost reductions that may be
achieved from the combined operations.
The pro forma financial information for the three months ended
September 30, 2005, combines the historical results for
Per-Ses three months ended September 30, 2005, and
the historical results for NDCHealth for the period from
May 28, 2005, to September 2, 2005. The pro forma
financial information for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, combines the historical results for
Per-Ses nine months ended September 30, 2005, and the
historical results for NDCHealth for the period from
November 27, 2004, to September 2, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
September 30, 2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
150,070
|
|
|
$
|
445,384
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
6,853
|
|
|
$
|
(175
|
)
|
Net loss per common
share basic
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Net loss per common
share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes approximately $13.3 million of in-process research
and development expense |
Note 4
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by
dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of
Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects
the potential dilution that could occur from common shares
issuable through stock options and other equity-based awards.
The following sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
net income per share for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6,758
|
|
|
$
|
9,823
|
|
|
$
|
5,975
|
|
|
$
|
26,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net
income per common share basic
|
|
|
39,134
|
|
|
|
29,994
|
|
|
|
38,861
|
|
|
|
30,019
|
|
Effect of potentially dilutive
stock options and other equity-based awards
|
|
|
4,069
|
|
|
|
3,798
|
|
|
|
4,674
|
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net
income per common share diluted
|
|
|
43,203
|
|
|
|
33,792
|
|
|
|
43,535
|
|
|
|
32,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The calculation of diluted EPS for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2006, excludes 1.1 million and
2.5 million shares of Common Stock issuable through stock
options and other equity-based awards because the exercise
prices of the awards were greater than the average market price
of the common shares, and therefore, the effect of including
these awards would have been antidilutive.
14
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Options to purchase 0.1 million and 0.5 million shares
of Common Stock during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005, were excluded from the computation of
diluted EPS because the exercise prices of the options were
greater than the average market price of the common shares, and
therefore, the effect of including these options would have been
antidilutive.
Note 5
Comprehensive Income
The functional currency of the Companys operations outside
of the United States is the local countrys currency.
Consequently, assets and liabilities of operations outside the
United States are translated into dollars using exchange rates
at the end of each reporting period. Revenue and expenses are
translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the
period. Cumulative translation gains and losses are reported in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
The components of comprehensive income for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, and 2005, are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6,758
|
|
|
$
|
9,823
|
|
|
$
|
5,975
|
|
|
$
|
26,800
|
|
Change in cumulative foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Change in cash flow hedging
activities
|
|
|
(1,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
4,830
|
|
|
$
|
9,765
|
|
|
$
|
6,628
|
|
|
$
|
26,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at
September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, consists of
the following components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cumulative foreign currency
translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
(567
|
)
|
|
$
|
(547
|
)
|
Cumulative cash flow hedging
activities
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 7 Long-Term Debt for further
information on the Companys cash flow hedging activities.
Note 6
Legal Matters
On April 7, 2004, a putative securities
class-action,
captioned Garfield v. NDCHealth Corporation, et al.,
was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia against NDCHealth and two of its former
executives, as defendants. The lawsuit alleges that the
defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making material
misrepresentations and omissions to the investing public
regarding NDCHealths revenue recognition practices during
the period from October 1, 2003, through June 30,
2004. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and the recovery
of reasonable attorneys fees and costs. On
September 1, 2004, a second amended complaint was filed.
The second amended complaint added other former NDCHealth
executives, as well as Ernst & Young LLP, as
defendants. The second amended complaint generally alleges,
among other things, that members of a purported class of
stockholders who purchased NDCHealth common stock between
October 1, 2003, and August 9, 2004, were damaged as a
result of (i) improper revenue recognition practices in
NDCHealths physician business unit; (ii) the failure
to timely writedown NDCHealths investment in MedUnite,
Inc.; and (iii) the improper capitalization and
amortization of costs associated with software development. It
alleges that, as a result of such conduct, NDCHealths
previously issued financial statements were
15
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
materially false and misleading, thereby causing the prices of
NDCHealths common stock to be inflated artificially. It
asserts violations of Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
Rule 10b-5
thereunder and seeks unspecified monetary damages and other
relief. On October 13, 2004, NDCHealth and the individual
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the second amended
complaint. On July 27, 2005, the District Court granted the
motion to dismiss without prejudice. Plaintiffs were granted
leave to file a third amended complaint by August 26, 2005.
On August 26, 2005, plaintiffs filed a notice appealing the
dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
Circuit. The Eleventh Circuit has affirmed the dismissal;
however, the plaintiffs retain their rights to file a motion for
rehearing en banc with the Eleventh Circuit
and/or to
appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
On May 10, 2005, a complaint captioned MMI Investments,
L.P. v. NDCHealth Corporation, et al., was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York against NDCHealth and certain of its former executives.
The complaint generally alleges that plaintiff MMI Investments,
L.P. (MMI) was damaged as a result of its purchases
of NDCHealth common stock at artificially inflated prices from
July 2003 through August 9, 2004. More specifically, the
complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b),
18 and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Rule 10b-5
thereunder and committed common law fraud by materially
overstating the reported financial condition of NDCHealth and
issuing overly optimistic forecasts concerning NDCHealths
financial prospects. It seeks unspecified monetary and other
relief. On July 22, 2005, defendants filed a motion to
dismiss MMIs Section 10(b), Section 20(a) and
common law fraud claims
and/or
transfer the action to the Northern District of Georgia. The
parties are currently engaged in discovery.
The Company is subject to claims, litigation and official
billing inquiries arising in the ordinary course of its
business. These matters include, but are not limited to,
lawsuits brought by former customers with respect to the
operation of the Companys business. The Company has also
received written demands from customers and former customers
that have not resulted in legal action. Within the
Companys industry, federal and state civil and criminal
laws govern medical billing and collection activities. These
laws provide for various fines, penalties, multiple damages,
assessments and sanctions for violations, including possible
exclusion from federal and state healthcare payer programs.
The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to the
claims and other issues asserted in pending legal matters;
however, there can be no assurance that such matters or any
future legal matters will not have an adverse effect on the
Company. Amounts of awards or losses, if any, in pending legal
matters have not been reflected in the financial statements
unless probable and reasonably estimable.
In April 1999, the Company sold the commercial division of its
former Impact Innovations Group, but retained the
divisions claim for compensatory damages as plaintiff in a
lawsuit against one of the divisions former vendors. In
November 2003, the trial court granted a motion for summary
judgment in favor of the vendor, but the decision was overturned
on appeal and the case was remanded for trial. In June 2006, the
case was tried and the jury found in favor of the vendor. Costs
incurred by the Company in connection with the trial are
included net of tax in loss from discontinued operations in the
consolidated statements of income for the three months and nine
months ended September 30, 2006.
Note 7
Long-Term Debt
On January 6, 2006, Per-Se acquired NDCHealth. In
connection with the acquisition, the Company secured financing
in the form of a new senior credit facility consisting of a
$435 million term loan and a $50 million revolving
credit facility (Senior Credit Facility), which
replaced the Companys prior $75 million revolving
credit facility. The term loan matures in seven years and, at
the Companys election, bears interest at a rate of either
LIBOR plus 2.25% or Base Rate, as defined by the Senior Credit
Facility, plus 1.25%. During the first nine months of 2006, the
Company elected to use LIBOR plus 2.25%. The revolving credit
facility has an interest rate that varies between LIBOR plus
1.50% and LIBOR plus 2.50% or between Base Rate plus 0.5% and
Base Rate plus 1.50%, based on performance, and matures in five
years. The Company has the option of electing LIBOR or Base
Rate. The Company has incurred no borrowings under the revolving
credit facility. In conjunction with the financing
16
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
transaction, the Company capitalized approximately
$7.7 million in expenses, including legal and other
professional fees, which are included in other long-term assets
in the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company is required to pay an annual commitment fee ranging
from 0.25% to 0.50% of the unused capacity related to the
revolving credit facility. The commitment fee range is based on
the Companys consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in
the facility agreement. The Company intends to use the revolving
credit facility, as needed, for future investments in
operations, including capital expenditures, strategic
acquisitions, to secure its letters of credit, as needed, and
other general corporate purposes.
All obligations under the Senior Credit Facility are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior secured basis, jointly
and severally by all of the Companys present and future
domestic and material foreign subsidiaries (the Subsidiary
Guarantors). The financial statements of the Subsidiary
Guarantors have not been presented, as all subsidiaries, except
for certain minor foreign subsidiaries, have provided
guarantees, and the parent company does not have any significant
operations or assets separate from its investment in those
subsidiaries. Any non-guarantor subsidiaries are minor
individually and in the aggregate to the Companys
consolidated financial statements. There are no restrictions on
the Subsidiary Guarantors that would prohibit the transfer of
funds or assets to the parent company by dividend or loan.
The Senior Credit Facility contains financial and other
restrictive covenants, including, without limitation, those
restricting additional indebtedness, lien creation, dividend
payments, asset sales and stock offerings, and those requiring a
maximum leverage, maximum senior leverage, and minimum fixed
charge coverage, each as defined in the Senior Credit Facility.
The Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants as
of September 30, 2006.
Also on January 6, 2006, the Company entered into a
four-year interest rate swap agreement, in order to hedge
against potential interest rate fluctuations resulting from the
variable interest rate under the terms of the new Senior Credit
Facility. Pursuant to the terms of the interest rate swap, the
Company is obligated to periodically pay an amount based on a
fixed interest rate, and the Company will receive an amount
based on a variable rate. The variable rate is based on the
three-month LIBOR rate available at the time. By entering into
the interest rate swap, the Company has effectively fixed the
maximum interest rate that the Company will pay on a portion of
the outstanding balance under the Senior Credit Facility at
4.76% per annum plus the applicable spread, which is 2.25%.
The amount of the Senior Credit Facility that is covered by the
swap is $125 million in years one and two, decreasing to
$100 million in year three and $75 million in year
four. The interest rate swap will terminate on December 31,
2009, unless sooner terminated pursuant to its terms.
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133)
requires that a company recognize derivatives as assets or
liabilities on its balance sheet, and also requires that the
gain or loss related to the effective portion of derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges be recorded as a component of
other comprehensive income. This interest rate swap was
designated as a cash flow hedge, was documented as fully
effective, and was valued as an asset totaling approximately
$0.7 million at September 30, 2006. The fair value of
this swap arrangement is included in other long-term assets in
the consolidated balance sheets, and the related gains or losses
are recorded, net of income tax effects, as a component of other
comprehensive income.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the
Company retired approximately $50 million in term loan debt.
Note 8
Income Taxes
Income tax expense, which was primarily related to federal,
state and local income taxes, was approximately
$6.0 million and $0.2 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2006, and 2005, respectively, and
$12.3 million and $0.6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had a valuation
allowance against its deferred tax asset of $125.3 million
due to the uncertainty regarding its ability to generate
sufficient future taxable income prior to
17
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
the expiration of its net operating loss carryforwards. As a
result of the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company released
approximately $84 million of its deferred tax asset
valuation allowance against the goodwill resulting from the
transaction to offset a deferred tax liability recorded as part
of the acquisition. The majority of this liability relates to
the increase in the valuation of NDCHealths fixed assets
and identifiable intangible assets resulting from the
acquisition that were recorded for GAAP. Since the NDCHealth
acquisition was an acquisition of stock, NDCHealths tax
basis of the assets carries over to the Company as its tax
basis. Therefore, the Company will not receive a tax benefit
from the additional intangible amortization recorded for GAAP
purposes. As a result of this accounting treatment for the
acquisition, the Companys taxable income relating to this
acquisition will be greater than its corresponding GAAP income,
which will result in the utilization of previously reserved net
operating loss carryforwards corresponding to the amount of the
disallowed depreciation and amortization for income tax
purposes. Since management believes it is more likely than not
that a portion of the Companys deferred tax asset will be
realized due to the reversal of the deferred tax liability
recorded in connection with the acquisition, the Company
released a portion of its valuation allowance against the asset.
The Company estimates that approximately 36% of goodwill
acquired will be deductible for tax purposes. The deductible
goodwill will be amortized for tax purposes over the next
11 years.
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company reassessed the
remaining valuation allowance and determined that it was more
likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset would
be realized in the foreseeable future. This determination was
based upon the Companys projection of taxable income for
2006 and 2007. Accordingly, $3.4 million of the valuation
allowance was released during the first quarter of 2006, of
which $1.9 million was recorded to equity as additional
paid-in-capital
and $1.5 million was recorded as a reduction in the income
tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
This $3.4 million release of the valuation allowance
results in a $33.7 million net deferred tax asset at
September 30, 2006.
In the third quarter of 2006, certain adjustments were made to
the opening balance sheet for NDCHealth that resulted in an
increase to the Companys acquisition-related deferred tax
liability. As a result of that increase, the deferred tax asset
valuation allowance release that was recorded as a reduction in
the income tax provision during the first quarter of 2006 was
also adjusted. The effect of that adjustment resulted in a
$0.5 million increase in the income tax provision for the
three months ended September 30, 2006.
On November 10, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax
Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards. The Company
elected to adopt the alternative transition method, which is the
simplified method provided in the FASB Staff Position for
calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant
to SFAS No. 123(R). The alternative transition method
was used to determine the beginning balance of the additional
paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax
effects of employee stock-based compensation. Due to the
Companys history of tax net operating losses, the Company
had no beginning balance in the APIC pool at the date of
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006.
The Company uses the
with-and-without
or incremental approach for determining the order in
which tax benefits derived from the share-based payment awards
are utilized. Using the
with-and-without
approach, actual income taxes payable for the period are
compared to the amount of income taxes that would have been
payable if there had been no share-based compensation expense
for tax purposes in excess of the compensation expense
recognized for financial reporting purposes. As a result of this
approach, tax net operating loss carryforwards not related to
share-based compensation are utilized before the current
periods share-based compensation deduction. As a result of
this accounting treatment, the Company has a fully reserved
deferred tax asset of approximately $25.8 million related
to tax net operating loss carryforwards for non-qualified stock
option deductions as of September 30, 2006. The benefit of
the valuation allowance release related to these deductions will
be recorded directly to equity as additional
paid-in-capital
when such benefits are realized.
18
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Note 9
Restructuring Expenses
The amount of lease termination costs associated with a 1995
restructuring applied against the reserve in the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve Balance
|
|
|
Costs Applied
|
|
|
Reserve Balance
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Against Reserve
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Lease termination costs
|
|
$
|
807
|
|
|
$
|
(169
|
)
|
|
$
|
638
|
|
Note 10
Segment Reporting
The Companys reportable segments are operating units that
offer different services and products. Per-Se provides its
services and products through its three operating divisions:
Physician Solutions, Hospital Solutions, and Pharmacy Solutions.
The Physician Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare
solutions that manage the revenue cycle for physician groups.
The division provides a complete outsourcing service, therefore,
allowing physician groups to avoid the infrastructure investment
and administrative costs in their own in-house billing office.
The division is the largest provider of business management
outsourced services that supplant all or most of the
administrative functions of a physician group. Its target market
is primarily hospital-affiliated physician groups in the
specialties of radiology, anesthesiology, emergency medicine and
pathology as well as physician groups practicing in the academic
setting and other large physician groups. Services include
clinical data collection, data input, medical coding, billing,
contract management, cash collections, accounts receivable
management and extensive reporting of metrics related to the
physician practice. These services help physician groups to be
financially successful by improving cash flows and reducing
administrative costs and burdens. Fees for these services are
primarily based on a percentage of net collections on the
clients accounts receivable. The division recognizes
revenue and bills customers when the customers receive payment
on those accounts receivable, which aligns the divisions
interests with the interests of the physician groups it
services. The division also generates revenue from one-time
sales of physician practice management (PPM)
software or monthly usage fees for software used via an
Application Service Provider (ASP) model. The
divisions revenue model is more than 90% recurring in
nature due to the transaction-based nature of its fee revenue in
the outsourced services business and the monthly usage fee in
the PPM business. The business of the Physician Solutions
division is conducted by PST Services, Inc., a Georgia
corporation, and NDCHealth Corporation, a Delaware corporation,
both of which are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. Both
of these subsidiaries do business under the name Per-Se
Technologies.
The Hospital Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare
solutions that focus on revenue cycle and resource management to
improve the financial health of hospitals and healthcare
organizations. The division has one of the largest electronic
clearinghouses in the medical industry, which provides an
important infrastructure to support its revenue cycle management
offerings. The clearinghouse delivers dedicated electronic and
Internet-based
business-to-business
solutions that focus on electronic processing of medical
transactions as well as complementary transactions, such as
electronic remittance advices, real-time eligibility
verification and high-speed print and mail services. Other
revenue cycle management solutions provide insight into a
hospitals revenue cycle inefficiencies, such as denial
management. Denial management allows hospitals to identify
charges denied reimbursement by a payer and to facilitate
corrective actions such that claims may be resubmitted for
reimbursement. Hospitals may opt to outsource portions of their
revenue cycle management process to the Company, such as
secondary insurance billing, or outsource their entire central
billing office. The division also provides resource management
solutions that enable hospitals to efficiently manage resources
to reduce costs and improve their bottom line. The
divisions staff scheduling software efficiently plans
nurse schedules, accommodating individual preferences as well as
environmental factors, such as acuity levels, and can schedule
all the personnel across the hospital enterprise. The
divisions patient scheduling software helps effectively
manage a hospitals most expensive and profitable area, the
operating room, as well as schedules patients across the
enterprise. The division primarily
19
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
recognizes revenue on a per-transaction basis for its revenue
cycle management solutions and primarily recognizes revenue on a
percentage-of-completion
basis or upon software shipment for sales of its resource
management software solutions. Greater than 90% of the
divisions revenue is recurring due to its
transaction-based business and the maintenance revenue from its
substantial installed base for the revenue cycle management
solutions and resource management software. The business of the
Hospital Solutions division is conducted by the following wholly
owned subsidiaries of the Company: Per-Se Transaction Services,
Inc., an Ohio corporation; Patient Account Management
Services, Inc., an Ohio corporation; PST Products, LLC, a
California limited liability company; Knowledgeable Healthcare
Solutions, Inc., an Alabama corporation, and NDCHealth
Corporation, a Delaware corporation. All of these subsidiaries
do business under the name Per-Se Technologies.
The Pharmacy Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare
solutions that focus on transaction clearinghouse services and
point-of-service
systems to improve administrative efficiencies and optimize the
revenue and cash flow of retail and mail order pharmacies in the
U.S. This division has a leading market position in
pharmacy services and systems with connectivity to approximately
90% of the retail pharmacy stores, processing more than six
billion total pharmacy transactions annually, and has systems
installed in more than 20% of pharmacies in the U.S. The
divisions electronic clearinghouse for pharmacy
transactions provides real-time processing related to claims
submission, eligibility verification, remittance advice,
referral authorization, and drug formulary, as well as claim
status and tracking. The division also provides value-added
transaction services and claims edits that perform financial and
administrative reviews on transactions to help pharmacies
enhance the accuracy of submitted claims, decrease receivable
days outstanding and improve labor efficiency. The
divisions
point-of-service
systems offerings help retail and mail order pharmacies
streamline workflow, improve cash flow and reduce costs while
also serving as an additional source of transaction volume for
the divisions electronic clearinghouse. The
divisions revenue model is more than 90% recurring in
nature due to the transaction-based or fixed-fee nature of its
revenue in the services business and the maintenance-based
nature of revenue in its systems business. The business of the
Pharmacy Solutions division is conducted by NDCHealth
Corporation, a Delaware corporation d/b/a Per-Se
Technologies.
The Company evaluates each segments performance based on
its segment operating income. Segment operating income is
revenue less cost of services, selling, general and
administrative expenses and other expenses.
The Hospital Solutions segment revenue includes intersegment
revenue for services provided to the Physician Solutions
segment, which are shown as eliminations to reconcile to total
consolidated revenue.
The Companys segment information from continuing
operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physician Solutions
|
|
$
|
77,835
|
|
|
$
|
69,805
|
|
|
$
|
235,344
|
|
|
$
|
206,063
|
|
Hospital Solutions
|
|
|
44,083
|
|
|
|
27,860
|
|
|
|
132,173
|
|
|
|
84,032
|
|
Pharmacy Solutions
|
|
|
31,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(4,062
|
)
|
|
|
(3,659
|
)
|
|
|
(12,214
|
)
|
|
|
(10,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
148,871
|
|
|
$
|
94,006
|
|
|
$
|
447,785
|
|
|
$
|
279,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Segment operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physician Solutions
|
|
$
|
65,578
|
|
|
$
|
61,430
|
|
|
$
|
202,743
|
|
|
$
|
181,633
|
|
Hospital Solutions
|
|
|
32,217
|
|
|
|
21,720
|
|
|
|
100,616
|
|
|
|
66,202
|
|
Pharmacy Solutions
|
|
|
26,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
7,698
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
28,349
|
|
|
|
11,552
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(4,062
|
)
|
|
|
(3,659
|
)
|
|
|
(12,214
|
)
|
|
|
(10,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,521
|
|
|
$
|
83,007
|
|
|
$
|
404,862
|
|
|
$
|
248,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physician Solutions
|
|
$
|
12,257
|
|
|
$
|
8,375
|
|
|
$
|
32,601
|
|
|
$
|
24,430
|
|
Hospital Solutions
|
|
|
11,866
|
|
|
|
6,140
|
|
|
|
31,557
|
|
|
|
17,830
|
|
Pharmacy Solutions
|
|
|
4,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(7,698
|
)
|
|
|
(3,516
|
)
|
|
|
(28,349
|
)
|
|
|
(11,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,350
|
|
|
$
|
10,999
|
|
|
$
|
42,923
|
|
|
$
|
30,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
8,925
|
|
|
$
|
1,431
|
|
|
$
|
26,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(1,649
|
)
|
|
|
(1,075
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes
|
|
$
|
12,960
|
|
|
$
|
9,995
|
|
|
$
|
18,572
|
|
|
$
|
27,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physician Solutions
|
|
$
|
2,265
|
|
|
$
|
1,996
|
|
|
$
|
8,901
|
|
|
$
|
6,153
|
|
Hospital Solutions
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
|
|
14,406
|
|
|
|
4,827
|
|
Pharmacy Solutions
|
|
|
5,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,914
|
|
|
$
|
3,694
|
|
|
$
|
49,310
|
|
|
$
|
11,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures and
capitalized software development costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physician Solutions
|
|
$
|
2,415
|
|
|
$
|
1,734
|
|
|
$
|
6,061
|
|
|
$
|
5,223
|
|
Hospital Solutions
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
9,369
|
|
|
|
5,008
|
|
Pharmacy Solutions
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,435
|
|
|
$
|
2,740
|
|
|
$
|
21,342
|
|
|
$
|
10,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Identifiable assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physician Solutions
|
|
$
|
189,881
|
|
|
$
|
66,380
|
|
Hospital Solutions
|
|
|
342,242
|
|
|
|
71,482
|
|
Pharmacy Solutions
|
|
|
283,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
125,244
|
|
|
|
101,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
941,338
|
|
|
$
|
239,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, depreciation
and amortization expense includes $13.3 million of
in-process research and development that was purchased as part
of the NDCHealth acquisition and expensed during the first three
months of 2006. By segment, Physician Solutions includes
approximately $1.9 million, Hospital Solutions includes
approximately $2.8 million and Pharmacy Solutions includes
approximately $8.6 million of in-process research and
development expense. |
|
|
Note 11
|
Retirement
Benefits
|
In connection with the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company
assumed the NDCHealth noncontributory defined benefit pension
plan (the Pension Plan). The Pension Plan covered
substantially all of the former NDCHealth employees who had met
the eligibility provisions of the Plan as of May 31, 1998.
The Pension Plan was closed to new participants beginning
June 1, 1998, and benefit accruals for years of service
ceased on July 31, 1998. Additionally, benefit accruals for
compensation level increases ceased on June 30, 2003.
Provisions of the Pension Plan meet the requirements of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The
Pension Plan is approximately 68% funded.
The liability relating to Pension Plan benefits totaled
approximately $11.0 million, and is included in other
obligations on the consolidated balance sheet at
September 30, 2006. Net periodic pension cost for the
Pension Plan during the period from January 6, 2006, (the
date of the acquisition of NDCHealth) through September 30,
2006, and for the three months ended September 30, 2006,
includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 6, 2006
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
Through September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
|
$
|
1,608
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company made contributions of $0.7 million and $1.4
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006,
respectively. The Company anticipates making $0.7 million
in additional contributions to fund the Pension Plan during the
remainder of the 2006 fiscal year.
|
|
Note 12
|
Physician
Solutions Agreement
|
The Physician Solutions Division signed an agreement (the
Agreement) in 2004 with a customer to provide
business management outsourced services. Under the Agreement,
Physician Solutions and the customer agreed to certain
performance goals. The performance goals were measured on an
interim basis. At each interim measurement period, Physician
Solutions determined if the performance goals for that period
had been achieved. However, the interim measurement periods
specified in the contract did not coincide with the
Companys quarterly reporting
22
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
periods. As a result, a portion of the fees the Company received
under this contract in any quarter were subject to a performance
goal for an interim period ending after the Companys
quarterly reporting period, and consequently, were not
considered fixed and determinable for revenue recognition
purposes at the end of that period. This resulted in deferred
revenue recorded in the Companys consolidated balance
sheet.
During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company
signed an amendment to this contract. As a result, the Company
no longer has performance goals or interim measurement periods
as specified in the original contract. The deferral of revenue
is no longer required. As a result, during the three months
ended June 30, 2006, the Company recognized approximately
$0.9 million of revenue that was previously deferred.
Note 13
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48). The Interpretation is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FASB
Statement No. 109 does not provide specific guidance on how
uncertainties on tax positions should be reflected in a
companys financial statements. FIN 48 prescribes a
financial statement recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. The FASBs objective in issuing this
interpretation is to increase comparability in financial
reporting of income taxes. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
The cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 will be recorded
in opening retained earnings for the fiscal year of adoption.
The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption
of FIN 48 will have on its financial statements.
FIN 48 will be effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2007.
On September 15, 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157) which establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP.
SFAS No. 157 will apply whenever another GAAP standard
requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at
fair value but does not expand the use of fair value to any new
circumstances. This standard also will require additional
disclosures in both annual and quarterly reports.
SFAS No. 157 will be effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and will be adopted by the Company on
January 1, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the
impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on
its financial statements.
On September 29, 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R)
(SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 is
effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after
December 15, 2006. The statement requires an employer to
recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined
benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as
an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and
to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which
the changes occur through comprehensive income.
SFAS No. 158 also requires an employer to measure a
plans assets and its obligations that determine its funded
status as of the end of the employers fiscal year. The
Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of
SFAS No. 158 will have on its financial statements.
Note 14
Subsequent Event
On November 5, 2006, Per-Se entered into an agreement and
plan of merger (the Merger Agreement) with McKesson
Corporation (McKesson) and its wholly-owned
acquisition subsidiary pursuant to which the acquisition
subsidiary will be merged with and into Per-Se with Per-Se being
the surviving corporation in the Merger. Per-Se will continue as
a wholly owned subsidiary of McKesson.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the
merger, each share of Common Stock of Per-Se issued and
outstanding will be converted into the right to receive $28.00
in cash, without interest. The transaction is
23
PER-SE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
subject to regulatory and shareholder approval and other
customary closing conditions and is expected to close in the
first quarter of 2007. The Merger has been approved by
Per-Ses Board of Directors.
In accordance with the change of control provisions of the
Companys equity-based compensation plans, immediately
prior to the effective time of the Merger, all unvested equity
awards will vest, except for service-based restricted stock
units assumed by McKesson, as described below. All outstanding
stock options will be cancelled at the effective time of the
Merger in exchange for the right to receive a cash payment equal
to the product of (i) the number of shares underlying such
option, whether vested or unvested; multiplied by (ii) the
excess, if any, of the $28.00 per share merger consideration
over the exercise price per share of such option.
Performance-based restricted stock units (RSUs)
outstanding at the effective time of the Merger will be
cancelled in exchange for the right to receive $28.00 in cash
for each share of Per-Se Common Stock subject to such
performance-based RSUs. Outstanding service-based RSUs will be
assumed by McKesson and converted into the right to receive upon
settlement (otherwise in accordance with the terms of the
applicable plan and award agreements) the number of shares of
McKesson Common Stock equal to (i) the number of shares of
Per-Se Common Stock subject to such service-based RSUs
immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger multiplied
by (ii) the quotient of (x) the $28.00 divided by
(y) the closing price of McKesson Common Stock at that
time. The cash payments in each case will be reduced by
applicable withholding taxes.
In October 2006, Per-Se retained an investment banking firm to
serve as its financial advisor in connection with the Merger.
Per-Se incurred a fee of $1 million to that firm upon
delivery of its fairness opinion in connection with approval of
the Merger Agreement by Per-Ses Board of Directors. At the
effective time of the Merger, Per-Se will owe the investment
banking firm fees of $3.5 million.
Under the Merger Agreement, Per-Se has agreed that, prior to the
effective time of the Merger (unless consented to in writing in
advance by McKesson and subject to certain exceptions), Per-Se
will carry on business in the ordinary and usual course and that
Per-Se will use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve
Per-Ses business organization and maintain relations and
goodwill with customers, suppliers, distributors, strategic
partners, creditors, lessors, employees and business associates.
Additionally, Per-Se has agreed, subject to certain exceptions,
to comply with certain restrictive covenants which limit
Per-Ses ability to take certain actions inconsistent with
the ordinary course of business without McKessons prior
written consent.
The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights of
McKesson and Per-Se, including the right of Per-Se to terminate
the Merger Agreement in order to pursue an unsolicited offer to
acquire Per-Se from a third party that Per-Ses Board of
Directors determines to be superior to the offer from McKesson.
The Merger Agreement also provides that, upon the termination of
the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, Per-Se would
be required to pay McKesson a termination fee of
$44 million.
24
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Description
of Business
Per-Se Technologies, Inc. (Per-Se or the
Company), a corporation organized in 1985 under the
laws of the State of Delaware, is focused on providing solutions
that improve the administrative functions of the healthcare
industry. Specifically, Per-Se provides Connective Healthcare
solutions that help physicians, hospitals and pharmacies achieve
their income potential. Connective Healthcare solutions support
and unite healthcare providers, payers and patients with
innovative technology processes that improve and accelerate
reimbursement and reduce the administrative cost of care.
The Company markets its products and services to constituents of
the healthcare industry, primarily to hospital-affiliated
physician practices, physician groups in academic and
office-based settings, hospitals, healthcare organizations,
integrated delivery networks (IDNs) and retail
and mail order pharmacies.
The Physician Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare
solutions that manage the revenue cycle for physician groups.
The division provides a complete outsourcing service, therefore,
allowing physician groups to avoid the infrastructure investment
and administrative costs in their own in-house billing office.
The division is the largest provider of business management
outsourced services that supplant all or most of the
administrative functions of a physician group. The
divisions target market is primarily hospital-affiliated
physician groups in the specialties of radiology,
anesthesiology, emergency medicine and pathology as well as
physician groups practicing in the academic setting and other
large physician groups. Services include clinical data
collection, data input, medical coding, billing, contract
management, cash collections, accounts receivable management and
extensive reporting of metrics related to the physician
practice. These services help physician groups to be financially
successful by improving cash flows and reducing administrative
costs and burdens. Fees for these services are primarily based
on a percentage of net collections on the clients accounts
receivable. The division recognizes revenue and bills customers
when the customers receive payment on those accounts receivable,
which aligns the divisions interests with the interests of
the physician groups it services. The Company also generates
revenue from one-time sales of physician practice management
(PPM) software or monthly usage fees for software
used via an Application Service Provider (ASP)
model. The divisions revenue model is more than 90%
recurring in nature due to the transaction-based nature of its
fee revenue in the outsourced services business and the monthly
usage fee in the PPM business.
The Hospital Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare
solutions that focus on revenue cycle and resource management to
improve the financial health and administrative efficiency of
hospitals and healthcare organizations. The division has one of
the largest electronic clearinghouses in the medical industry,
which provides an important infrastructure to support its
revenue cycle management offerings. The clearinghouse delivers
dedicated electronic and Internet-based
business-to-business
solutions that focus on electronic processing of medical
transactions as well as complementary transactions, such as
electronic remittance advices, real-time eligibility
verification and high-speed print and mail services. Other
revenue cycle management solutions provide insight into a
hospitals revenue cycle inefficiencies, such as denial
management. Denial management allows hospitals to identify
charges denied reimbursement by a payer and to facilitate
corrective actions such as resubmitting for reimbursement.
Hospitals may opt to outsource portions of their revenue cycle
management process to the Company, such as secondary insurance
billing, or outsource their entire central billing office. The
division also provides resource management solutions that enable
hospitals to efficiently manage resources to reduce costs and
improve their bottom line. The divisions staff scheduling
software efficiently plans nurse schedules, accommodating
individual preferences as well as environmental factors, such as
acuity levels, and can schedule all the personnel across the
hospital enterprise. The divisions patient scheduling
software helps effectively manage a hospitals most
expensive and profitable area, the operating room, as well as
schedules patients across the enterprise. The division primarily
recognizes revenue on a per-transaction basis for its revenue
cycle management solutions and primarily recognizes revenue on a
percentage-of-completion
basis or upon software shipment for sales of its resource
management software solutions. Greater than 90% of the
divisions revenue is recurring due to its
transaction-based business and the maintenance revenue from its
substantial installed base for the revenue cycle management
solutions and resource management software.
25
The Pharmacy Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare
solutions that focus on transaction clearinghouse services and
point-of-service
systems to improve administrative efficiencies and optimize the
revenue and cash flow of retail and mail order pharmacies in the
U.S. This division has a leading market position in
pharmacy services and systems with connectivity to approximately
90% of retail pharmacy stores, processing more than six billion
total pharmacy transactions annually, and has systems installed
in more than 20% of pharmacies in the U.S. The
divisions electronic clearinghouse for pharmacy
transactions provides real-time processing related to claims
submission, eligibility verification, remittance advice,
referral authorization, and drug formulary as well as claim
status and tracking. The division also provides value-added
transaction services and claims edits that perform financial and
administrative reviews on transactions to help pharmacies
enhance the accuracy of submitted claims, decrease receivable
days outstanding and improve labor efficiency. The
divisions
point-of-service
systems offerings help retail and mail order pharmacies
streamline workflow, improve cash flow and reduce costs while
also serving as an additional source of transaction volume for
the divisions electronic clearinghouse. Historically, the
division has generated pharmacy systems revenue through the sale
of software licenses, upgrades and recurring maintenance and
support fees. The Companys new line of systems products is
being sold to customers with varying pricing and revenue models
that may include per-transaction fees, a license fee plus annual
maintenance or a monthly per store fee, depending on the
customer. The divisions revenue model is more than 90%
recurring in nature due to the transaction-based or fixed-fee
nature of its revenue in the services business and the
maintenance-based nature of revenue in its systems business.
General
Overview
Key Performance Indicators. Management
believes the key elements for assessing the Companys
performance are the ability to generate stable and improving
operating profit margins on existing business, and to generate
similar or better operating profit margins on new business. An
additional element is the ability to generate positive cash flow
from continuing operations. In assessing the Companys
performance, adjustments are made for items the Company
considers to be atypical, such as those noted below, to help
ensure the analysis is performed on a consistent, comparable
basis from period to period.
NDCHealth Acquisition. On August 29,
2005, Per-Se and NDCHealth Corporation (NDCHealth)
announced that they had signed definitive agreements for the
acquisition of NDCHealth, a leading provider of healthcare
technology and information solutions by Per-Se. The transaction
was completed on January 6, 2006. The Company now serves
the healthcare industry through three divisions: Physician
Solutions, Hospital Solutions and Pharmacy Solutions.
Atypical Items. Results during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, included atypical
items that related to the Companys acquisition and
integration of NDCHealth. These atypical expense items totaled
$1.2 million and $7.9 million during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
Adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R). Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123(R)) using the modified
prospective method. Under that transition method, compensation
cost recognized is: (a) based on the requirements of
SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted
after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements
of SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted to employees
prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) that
remain unvested on the effective date. The Companys
consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, reflect the impact of
SFAS No. 123(R). In accordance with the modified
prospective method, the Companys consolidated financial
statements for the prior periods have not been restated to
reflect, and do not include, the impact of
SFAS No. 123(R).
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company
accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors
using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB
No. 25 as allowed under SFAS No. 123. Under the
intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense was
recognized in the Companys consolidated statements of
operations for stock options because the exercise price of the
Companys stock options granted to employees and directors
equaled or exceeded the fair market value of the underlying
stock at the date of grant.
The Company recorded non-cash expense of approximately
$1.0 million and $3.4 million related to the adoption
of SFAS No. 123(R) for stock-based compensation in the
three and nine months ended September 30,
26
2006, respectively. As of September 30, 2006, there was
approximately $6.8 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to unvested stock options. This cost
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.5 years.
Long Term Incentive Plan. On May 25,
2006, the stockholders of the Company approved the Per-Se
Technologies, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2006
LTIP). A total of 1.5 million shares of the
Companys Common Stock are reserved and available for
issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2006 LTIP. The
2006 LTIP authorizes the granting of awards in the form of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted
or deferred stock units, performance awards, dividend
equivalents, performance-based cash awards, and other
stock-based awards to the Companys employees, officers,
directors and consultants.
On June 6, 2006, two types of restricted stock units were
granted under the 2006 LTIP: performance-based restricted stock
units and service-based restricted stock units. The
performance-based restricted stock units represent the right to
earn, on a
one-for-one
basis, a target number of shares of the Companys Common
Stock, provided that the grantee remains continuously employed
by the Company during the performance period. The
performance-based restricted stock agreements contain a
market-based condition that determines the number of shares
earned. This market-based condition stipulates that the
Companys performance be measured against the attainment of
specified targets for total shareholder return for the three
year period ending December 31, 2008. Based on the result
of this measurement, the number of shares earned can vary from
0% to 200% of the target number of shares. The service-based
restricted stock units represent the right to receive, on a
one-for-one
basis, a fixed number of shares of the Companys Common
Stock on the third anniversary of the grant date, provided that
the grantee remains continuously employed by the Company during
the vesting period.
The Company recorded non-cash expense of approximately
$0.6 million and $0.2 million related to the
performance-based restricted stock units and service-based
restricted stock units, respectively, during the three months
ended September 30, 2006. The Company recorded non-cash
expense of approximately $0.8 million and $0.3 million
related to the performance-based restricted stock units and
service-based restricted stock units, respectively, during the
nine months ended September 30, 2006.
At September 30, 2006, the unamortized compensation cost
related to performance-based restricted stock units totaled
$5.6 million, which will be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.3 years. The unamortized
compensation cost related to service-based restricted stock
units totaled $2.6 million at September 30, 2006,
which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.7 years.
Overview of Operating Results. Consolidated
revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2006,
increased approximately 58% as compared to the same period of
2005 due to the acquisition of NDCHealth. Consolidated operating
margins increased from 11.7% in the third quarter of 2005 to
14.3% in the third quarter of 2006 due to improvements in
profitability from organic growth and the acquisition of
NDCHealth. Although profitability improved year over year,
margins were negatively impacted by several atypical items
related to the acquisition and its integration, as discussed
above.
Cash Flow from Operations. The Company
generated $60.9 million in cash from continuing operations
during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared
to the first nine months of 2005 of $35.5 million. During
the first nine months of 2006, the Company used cash of
approximately $28.4 million related to the NDCHealth
acquisition and integration. The Company incurred several
expenses during the first nine months of 2006 that negatively
impacted profitability but had no impact on cash flow, including
approximately $13.3 million of expenses related to the
acquisition and integration of NDCHealth, as well as
approximately $4.5 million of expenses related to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP. Due to
the increase in debt related to the NDCHealth acquisition, cash
paid for interest during the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 increased by approximately
$21.0 million compared to the same period in 2005.
Capitalization. The Company used a combination
of both Common Stock and debt to fund its acquisition of
NDCHealth. During January 2006, the Company issued approximately
8.3 million shares to the shareholders of NDCHealth.
Additionally, the Company secured financing in the form of a new
senior credit facility consisting of a
27
$435 million term loan and a $50 million revolving
credit facility. The Company has incurred no borrowings under
the revolving credit facility.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the
Company retired approximately $50 million in term loan debt.
Results
of Operations
Three
months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to three
months ended September 30, 2005
Revenue. Revenue classified by the
Companys reportable segments (divisions) is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Physician Solutions
|
|
$
|
77,835
|
|
|
$
|
69,805
|
|
Hospital Solutions
|
|
|
44,083
|
|
|
|
27,860
|
|
Pharmacy Solutions
|
|
|
31,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(4,062
|
)
|
|
|
(3,659
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
148,871
|
|
|
$
|
94,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue for the Physician Solutions division increased
approximately 12% in the three months ended September 30,
2006, as compared to the same period in 2005. The Company
acquired and included within the Physician Solutions division
the results of the physician business of NDCHealth effective
January 6, 2006. Revenue growth in the quarter was
attributable to the acquired NDCHealth software business.
Revenue in the physician outsourcing business was flat
year-over-year
due to the timing of new business implementations. Pricing for
the divisions services and products was stable compared to
the prior year period.
Net new business sold in the outsourced receivables management
business during the third quarter of 2006 was approximately
$9 million compared to $2 million during the third
quarter of 2005. Net new business sold is defined as the
annualized revenue value of new contracts signed in a period,
less the annualized revenue value of terminated business in that
same period.
Net backlog at September 30, 2006, was approximately
$16 million, compared to the net backlog of approximately
$12 million at December 31, 2005, and approximately
$7 million at September 30, 2005. Net backlog
represents the annualized revenue related to new contracts
signed with the business still to be implemented, less the
annualized revenue related to existing contracts where
discontinuance notification has been received and the customer
has yet to be phased out. The Company focuses on maintaining a
positive net backlog and believes it is a useful indicator of
future revenue growth.
Revenue for the Hospital Solutions division increased
approximately 58% in the three months ended September 30,
2006, as compared to the same period in 2005. Results for the
third quarter of 2006 for the Hospital Solutions division
include the results of the hospital business of NDCHealth, which
was acquired on January 6, 2006, and the results of Integra
Solutions, which was acquired on December 1, 2005. Revenue
growth in the quarter was a result of these acquisitions.
Pricing for the divisions services and products was stable
compared to the prior year period. The division is continuing to
penetrate both its existing customer base and reach new
customers with its revenue cycle management products. New
business sold in the Hospital Solutions division during the
third quarter of 2006 was approximately $8 million compared
to $4 million during the third quarter of 2005. New
business sold is defined as the annualized revenue value of new
contracts signed in a period.
Revenue for the Pharmacy Solutions division was approximately
$31.0 million in the three months ended September 30,
2006. On January 6, 2006, the Company acquired the pharmacy
business from NDCHealth. The network services business benefited
from additional transaction volume as well as from market
acceptance of new, value-added network products. The pharmacy
systems business has a recurring software maintenance revenue
stream and benefited from implementations of new customers in
the quarter. New business sold in the Pharmacy
28
Solutions division during the third quarter of 2006 was
approximately $7 million. New business sold is defined as
the annualized revenue value of new contracts signed in a period.
The Hospital Solutions division revenue includes intersegment
revenue for services provided to the Physician Solutions
division, which is shown in Eliminations to reconcile to total
consolidated revenue.
Segment Operating Income. Segment operating
income is revenue less cost of services, selling, general and
administrative expenses and other expenses. Segment operating
income, classified by the Companys divisions, is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Physician Solutions
|
|
$
|
12,257
|
|
|
$
|
8,375
|
|
Hospital Solutions
|
|
|
11,866
|
|
|
|
6,140
|
|
Pharmacy Solutions
|
|
|
4,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(7,698
|
)
|
|
|
(3,516
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,350
|
|
|
$
|
10,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physician Solutions segment operating income increased
approximately 46% in the three months ended September 30,
2006, compared to the same period in 2005, resulting in
operating margins of approximately 15.7% in the three months
ended September 30, 2006, versus approximately 12.0% in the
same period in 2005. As compared to the third quarter of 2005,
operating income increased by approximately $4 million in
the quarter as a result of the acquisition of the NDCHealth
physician business, which historically operated at higher
margins than the Companys physician business. The third
quarter of 2006 included expenses of approximately
$0.4 million related to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP.
Hospital Solutions segment operating income increased
approximately 93% in the three months ended September 30,
2006, compared to the same period in 2005, resulting in
operating margins of approximately 26.9% compared to 22.0% in
the prior year period. Operating income increased approximately
$6 million in the quarter as a result of the acquisition of
the NDCHealth hospital business, which historically operated at
higher margins than the Companys revenue cycle management
business for hospitals, the acquisition of Integra Solutions,
and improvement in the business. The third quarter of 2006
included expenses of approximately $0.3 million related to
the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP.
Pharmacy Solutions segment operating income was
$4.9 million in the three months ended September 30,
2006, resulting in operating margins of approximately 15.9%. On
January 6, 2006, the Company acquired the pharmacy business
from NDCHealth. The divisions services business had
positive margins driven by volume and the introduction of new
products. The divisions systems business had negative
margins due to the development and roll out of new products. The
third quarter of 2006 also included expenses of approximately
$0.3 million related to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP.
Corporate overhead expenses, which include certain general and
administrative functions, increased approximately
$4.2 million in the three months ended September 30,
2006, compared to the same period in 2005. The increase is
attributable to the NDCHealth integration costs of approximately
$1.2 million and approximately $0.9 million of
expenses related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
and the 2006 LTIP. The remainder of the increase is due to the
NDCHealth acquisition.
Interest. Interest expense was approximately
$8.9 million for the three months ended September 30,
2006, as compared to $1.4 million for the same period in
2005. The increase is attributable to the issuance of
approximately $435 million in term loan debt related to the
NDCHealth acquisition, of which approximately $385 million
was outstanding at September 30, 2006. Interest income was
approximately $0.5 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2006, as compared to approximately
$0.4 million for the same period in 2005.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense, which was
primarily related to federal, state and local income taxes, was
approximately $6.0 million and $0.2 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006, and 2005,
29
respectively. In 2005, the release of a portion of the
Companys deferred tax asset valuation allowance reduced
the Companys GAAP income tax expense to an amount that
approximated the Companys cash tax paying rate. During the
three months ended September 30, 2006, there was not a
similar release of the Companys valuation allowance.
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had a valuation
allowance against its deferred tax asset of $125.3 million
due to the uncertainty regarding its ability to generate
sufficient future taxable income prior to the expiration of its
net operating loss carryforwards. As a result of the acquisition
of NDCHealth, the Company released approximately
$84 million of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance
against the goodwill resulting from the transaction to offset a
deferred tax liability recorded as part of the acquisition. The
majority of this liability relates to the increase in the
valuation of NDCHealths fixed assets and identifiable
intangible assets resulting from the transaction that were
recorded for GAAP. Since the NDCHealth acquisition was an
acquisition of stock, NDCHealths tax basis of the assets
carries over to the Company as its tax basis. Therefore, the
Company will not receive a tax benefit from the additional
intangible amortization recorded for GAAP purposes. As a result
of this accounting treatment for the acquisition, the
Companys taxable income relating to this acquisition will
be greater than its corresponding GAAP income, which will result
in the utilization of previously reserved net operating loss
carryforwards corresponding to the amount of the disallowed
depreciation and amortization for income tax purposes. Since
management believes it is more likely than not that a portion of
the Companys deferred tax asset will be realized due to
the reversal of the deferred tax liability recorded in
connection with the acquisition, the Company released a portion
of its valuation allowance against the asset.
In addition to the intangibles discussed above, the Company has
carryover tax basis of $125 million in the NDCHealth
goodwill. This basis will continue to be amortized for tax
purposes over the remaining life and will result in an
additional tax benefit of approximately $47.5 million over
the next 11 years. The benefit for the amortization of the
goodwill is not reflected in the deferred tax asset recorded in
accordance SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes.
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company reassessed the
remaining valuation allowance and determined that it was more
likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset would
be realized in the foreseeable future. This determination was
based upon the Companys projection of taxable income for
2006 and 2007. Accordingly, $3.4 million of the valuation
allowance was released during the first quarter of 2006, of
which $1.9 million was recorded to equity as additional
paid-in-capital
and $1.5 million was recorded as a reduction in the income
tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
This $3.4 million release of the valuation allowance
results in a $33.7 million net deferred tax asset at
September 30, 2006.
In the third quarter of 2006, certain adjustments were made to
the opening balance sheet for NDCHealth that resulted in an
increase to the Companys acquisition-related deferred tax
liability. As a result of that increase, the deferred tax asset
valuation allowance release that was recorded as a reduction in
the income tax provision during the first quarter of 2006 was
also adjusted. The effect of that adjustment resulted in a
$0.5 million increase in the income tax provision for the
three months ended September 30, 2006.
On November 10, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax
Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards. The Company
elected to adopt the alternative transition method, which is the
simplified method provided in the FASB Staff Position for
calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant
to SFAS No. 123(R). The alternative transition method
was used to determine the beginning balance of the additional
paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax
effects of employee stock-based compensation. Due to the
Companys history of tax net operating losses, the Company
had no beginning balance in the APIC pool at the date of
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006.
The Company uses the
with-and-without
or incremental approach for determining the order in
which tax benefits derived from the share-based payment awards
are utilized. Using the
with-and-without
approach, actual income taxes payable for the period are
compared to the amount of income taxes that would have been
payable if there had been no share-based compensation expense
for tax purposes in excess of the compensation expense
recognized for financial reporting purposes. As a result of this
approach, tax net operating loss carryforwards not related to
share-based compensation are utilized before the current
periods share-based compensation deduction. As a result of
this accounting treatment, the Company has a fully reserved
deferred tax asset of approximately $25.8 million related
to tax net operating loss carryforwards for non-qualified stock
option deductions as of
30
September 30, 2006. The benefit of the valuation allowance
release related to these deductions will be recorded directly to
equity as additional
paid-in-capital
when such benefits are realized.
The Company expects to continue to have a cash tax-paying rate
of between 5% and 6%. At December 31, 2005, the Company had
federal net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) for
income tax purposes of approximately $374.6 million, which
consists of $346.8 million of consolidated NOLs and
$27.8 million of separate return limitation NOLs. The NOLs
will expire at various dates and at various amounts from 2006
through 2024 with a substantial amount expiring between 2010 and
2019. The change in the Companys income tax rate has no
impact on the Companys ability to recognize NOLs and will
have no impact on cash flow until the NOLs are utilized for tax
purposes.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to nine months
ended September 30, 2005
Revenue. Revenue classified by the
Companys reportable segments (divisions) is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Physician Solutions
|
|
$
|
235,344
|
|
|
$
|
206,063
|
|
Hospital Solutions
|
|
|
132,173
|
|
|
|
84,032
|
|
Pharmacy Solutions
|
|
|
92,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(12,214
|
)
|
|
|
(10,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
447,785
|
|
|
$
|
279,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue for the Physician Solutions division increased
approximately 14% in the nine months ended September 30,
2006, as compared to the same period in 2005. The Company
acquired and included within the Physician Solutions division
the results of the physician business of NDCHealth effective
January 6, 2006. Pricing for the divisions services
and products was stable compared to the prior year period.
Revenue in the divisions outsourced receivables management
business, which represents approximately 88% of the
divisions revenue for the nine months and was not part of
the NDCHealth acquisition, increased approximately 4% due to
organic growth. Also contributing to the
year-over-year
increase was approximately $0.9 million in revenue
recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
which was previously deferred related to a large contract signed
in 2004. The contract was amended during the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, to eliminate the quarterly measurement
periods that resulted in the original revenue deferral. The
remainder of the growth in the nine months was attributable to
the NDCHealth acquisition.
Net new business sold in the outsourced receivables management
business during the first nine months of 2006 was approximately
$18 million compared to approximately $16 million
during the first nine months of 2005. Net new business sold is
defined as the annualized revenue value of new contracts signed
in a period, less the annualized revenue value of terminated
business in that same period.
Net backlog at September 30, 2006, was approximately
$16 million, compared to the net backlog of approximately
$12 million at December 31, 2005, and approximately
$7 million at September 30, 2005. Net backlog
represents the annualized revenue related to new contracts
signed with the business still to be implemented, less the
annualized revenue related to existing contracts where
discontinuance notification has been received and the customer
has yet to be phased out. The Company focuses on maintaining a
positive net backlog and believes it is a useful indicator of
future revenue growth.
Revenue for the Hospital Solutions division increased
approximately 57% in the nine months ended September 30,
2006, as compared to the same period in 2005. Results for the
first nine months of 2006 for the Hospital Solutions division
includes the results of the hospital business of NDCHealth,
which was acquired on January 6, 2006, and the results of
Integra Solutions, which was acquired on December 1, 2005.
Revenue growth in the current period was a result of these
acquisitions. Pricing for the divisions services and
products was stable compared to the prior year period. New
business sold in the Hospital Solutions division during the
first nine months of 2006 was
31
approximately $24 million compared to $12 million
during the first nine months of 2005. New business sold is
defined as the annualized revenue value of new contracts signed
in a period.
Revenue for the Pharmacy Solutions division was approximately
$92.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006. On January 6, 2006, the Company acquired the pharmacy
business from NDCHealth. The network services business benefited
from additional volume as well as from the implementation of
Medicare Part D on January 1, 2006, and from market
acceptance of new, value-added network products. The pharmacy
systems business has a recurring software maintenance revenue
stream and benefited from implementations of new customers in
the period. New business sold in the Pharmacy Solutions division
during the first nine months of 2006 was approximately
$25 million. New business sold is defined as the annualized
revenue value of new contracts signed in a period.
The Hospital Solutions division revenue includes intersegment
revenue for services provided to the Physician Solutions
division, which is shown in Eliminations to reconcile to total
consolidated revenue.
Segment Operating Income. Segment operating
income is revenue less cost of services, selling, general and
administrative expenses and other expenses. Segment operating
income, classified by the Companys divisions, is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Physician Solutions
|
|
$
|
32,601
|
|
|
$
|
24,430
|
|
Hospital Solutions
|
|
|
31,557
|
|
|
|
17,830
|
|
Pharmacy Solutions
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(28,349
|
)
|
|
|
(11,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,923
|
|
|
$
|
30,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physician Solutions segment operating income increased
approximately 33% in the nine months ended September 30,
2006, compared to the same period in 2005, resulting in
operating margins of approximately 13.9% in the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, versus approximately 11.9% in the
same period in 2005. As compared to the first nine months of
2005, operating income increased approximately $11 million
in the current year period as a result of revenue growth and the
acquisition of the NDCHealth physician business, which
historically operated at higher margins than the Companys
physician business. This increase was offset by expenses related
to the acquisition of NDCHealth of approximately
$0.1 million for severance and $1.9 million for the
write-off of in-process research and development that was
acquired in the purchase of NDCHealth. The first nine months of
2006 also included expenses of approximately $0.8 million
related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the
2006 LTIP. The positive impact of the approximately
$0.9 million of deferred revenue the division recognized
during the current year period related to a contract amendment
was offset by approximately $1.0 million in bad debt
expense recorded in the current year period for specific
accounts receivable in the Companys outsourcing business.
Hospital Solutions segment operating income increased
approximately 77% in the nine months ended September 30,
2006, compared to the same period in 2005, resulting in
operating margins of 23.9% in the current year period versus
21.2% in the prior year. Operating income increased
approximately $17 million in the current year period as a
result of the acquisition of the NDCHealth hospital business,
which historically operated at higher margins than the
Companys revenue cycle management business for hospitals,
the acquisition of Integra Solutions, and improvement in the
business. This increase was offset by expenses related to the
NDCHealth acquisition of approximately $0.1 million for
severance and $2.8 million for the write-off of in-process
research and development that was acquired in the purchase of
NDCHealth. The first nine months of 2006 also included expenses
of approximately $0.6 million related to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP.
Pharmacy Solutions segment operating income was
$7.1 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2006, resulting in operating margins of 7.7%. On January 6,
2006, the Company acquired the pharmacy business from NDCHealth.
The divisions income for the first nine months of 2006 was
negatively impacted by expenses of
32
approximately $8.6 million related to the write-off of
in-process research and development purchased as part of the
NDCHealth acquisition. The first nine months of 2006 also
included expenses of approximately $0.6 million related to
the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP.
Corporate overhead expenses, which include certain general and
administrative functions, increased approximately
$16.8 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2006, compared to the same period in 2005. The increase is
attributable to the NDCHealth integration costs of approximately
$7.7 million and approximately $2.6 million of
expenses related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
and the 2006 LTIP. The remainder of the increase is due to the
NDCHealth acquisition.
Interest. Interest expense was approximately
$26.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006, as compared to $4.4 million for the same period in
2005. The increase is attributable to the issuance of
approximately $435 million in term loan debt related to the
NDCHealth acquisition, of which approximately $385 million
was outstanding at September 30, 2006. Interest income was
approximately $1.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, as compared to approximately
$1.1 million for the same period in 2005.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense, which was
primarily related to federal, state and local income taxes, was
approximately $12.3 million and $0.6 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, and 2005,
respectively. In 2005, the release of a portion of the
Companys deferred tax asset valuation allowance reduced
the Companys GAAP income tax expense to an amount that
approximated the Companys cash tax paying rate. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, there was not a
similar release of the Companys valuation allowance.
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had a valuation
allowance against its deferred tax asset of $125.3 million
due to the uncertainty regarding its ability to generate
sufficient future taxable income prior to the expiration of its
net operating loss carryforwards. As a result of the acquisition
of NDCHealth, the Company released approximately
$84 million of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance
against the goodwill resulting from the transaction to offset a
deferred tax liability recorded as part of the acquisition. The
majority of this liability relates to the increase in the
valuation of NDCHealths fixed assets and identifiable
intangible assets resulting from the transaction that were
recorded for GAAP. Since the NDCHealth acquisition was an
acquisition of stock, NDCHealths tax basis of the assets
carries over to the Company as its tax basis. Therefore, the
Company will not receive a tax benefit from the additional
intangible amortization recorded for GAAP purposes. As a result
of this accounting treatment for the acquisition, the
Companys taxable income relating to this acquisition will
be greater than its corresponding GAAP income, which will result
in the utilization of previously reserved net operating loss
carryforwards corresponding to the amount of the disallowed
depreciation and amortization for income tax purposes. Since
management believes it is more likely than not that a portion of
the Companys deferred tax asset will be realized due to
the reversal of the deferred tax liability recorded in
connection with the acquisition, the Company released a portion
of its valuation allowance against the asset.
In addition to the intangibles discussed above, the Company has
carryover tax basis of $125 million in the NDCHealth
goodwill. This basis will continue to be amortized for tax
purposes over the remaining life and will result in an
additional tax benefit of approximately $47.5 million over
the next 11 years. The benefit for the amortization of the
goodwill is not reflected in the deferred tax asset recorded in
accordance with SFAS No. 109.
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company reassessed the
remaining valuation allowance and determined that it was more
likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset would
be realized in the foreseeable future. This determination was
based upon the Companys projection of taxable income for
2006 and 2007. Accordingly, $3.4 million of the valuation
allowance was released during the first quarter of 2006, of
which $1.9 million was recorded to equity as additional
paid-in-capital
and $1.5 million was recorded as a reduction in the income
tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
This $3.4 million release of the valuation allowance
results in a $33.7 million net deferred tax asset at
September 30, 2006.
In the third quarter of 2006, certain adjustments were made to
the opening balance sheet for NDCHealth that resulted in an
increase to the Companys acquisition-related deferred tax
liability. As a result of that increase, the deferred tax asset
valuation allowance release that was recorded as a reduction in
the income tax provision during
33
the first quarter of 2006 was also adjusted. The effect of that
adjustment resulted in a $0.5 million increase in the
income tax provision for the three months ended
September 30, 2006.
On November 10, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax
Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards. The Company
elected to adopt the alternative transition method, which is the
simplified method provided in the FASB Staff Position for
calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant
to SFAS No. 123(R). The alternative transition method
was used to determine the beginning balance of the additional
paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax
effects of employee stock-based compensation. Due to the
Companys history of tax net operating losses, the Company
had no beginning balance in the APIC pool at the date of
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006.
The Company uses the
with-and-without
or incremental approach for determining the order in
which tax benefits derived from the share-based payment awards
are utilized. Using the
with-and-without
approach, actual income taxes payable for the period are
compared to the amount of income taxes that would have been
payable if there had been no share-based compensation expense
for tax purposes in excess of the compensation expense
recognized for financial reporting purposes. As a result of this
approach, tax net operating loss carryforwards not related to
share-based compensation are utilized before the current
periods share-based compensation deduction. As a result of
this accounting treatment, the Company has a fully reserved
deferred tax asset of approximately $25.8 million related
to tax net operating loss carryforwards for non-qualified stock
option deductions as of September 30, 2006. The benefit of
the valuation allowance release related to these deductions will
be recorded directly to equity as additional
paid-in-capital
when such benefits are realized.
The Company expects to continue to have a cash tax-paying rate
of between 5% and 6%. At December 31, 2005, the Company had
federal net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) for
income tax purposes of approximately $374.6 million, which
consists of $346.8 million of consolidated NOLs and
$27.8 million of separate return limitation NOLs. The NOLs
will expire at various dates and at various amounts from 2006
through 2024 with a substantial amount expiring between 2010 and
2019. The change in the Companys income tax rate has no
impact on the Companys ability to recognize NOLs and will
have no impact on cash flow until the NOLs are utilized for tax
purposes.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The following table is a summary of the Companys cash
balances as of September 30, 2006, and December 31,
2005, and cash flows from continuing operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, and 2005, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$
|
52,453
|
|
|
$
|
61,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash provided by continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
60,856
|
|
|
$
|
35,537
|
|
Cash used for discontinued
operations
|
|
$
|
(484
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash used for investing activities
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(451,176
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,342
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used for)
financing activities from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
382,096
|
|
|
$
|
(9,487
|
)
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid
investments with a remaining maturity of no more than three
months at the date of purchase.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the
Company generated approximately $60.9 million in cash from
continuing operations as a result of increased profitability
from the business segments as well as from the acquisition of
NDCHealth. The Company used cash of approximately
$28.4 million for integration and other costs related to
the NDCHealth acquisition.
34
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the
Company generated approximately $35.5 million in cash from
continuing operations as a result of increased profitability and
the timing of payment of certain accruals.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the
Company used approximately $451.2 million in cash from
investing activities from continuing operations, including
$429.8 million used for the acquisition of NDCHealth, which
is net of approximately $100 million of cash acquired.
Approximately $21.3 million was used for capital
expenditures and investment in software development costs.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the
Company used approximately $12.3 million in cash for
investing activities from continuing operations primarily for
capital expenditures and investment in software development
costs. Additionally, the Company used approximately
$1.5 million for capitalized acquisition costs related to
the NDCHealth acquisition.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the
Company generated approximately $382.1 million in cash from
financing activities. The Company raised $435 million from
a new senior credit facility in connection with the acquisition
of NDCHealth and subsequently repaid approximately
$50 million on this facility during the period. In
conjunction with obtaining the new senior credit facility, the
Company capitalized approximately $7.7 million in expenses,
including legal and other professional fees, which are included
in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The
Company also had proceeds from the exercise of stock options of
approximately $4.3 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2006.
On January 6, 2006, Per-Se acquired NDCHealth. In
connection with the acquisition, the Company issued
approximately 8.3 million shares of Common Stock to
NDCHealth stockholders and secured financing in the form of a
new senior credit facility consisting of a $435 million
term loan and a $50 million revolving credit facility
(Senior Credit Facility), which replaced the
Companys prior $75 million revolving credit facility.
The term loan matures in seven years and, at the Companys
election, bears interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus 2.25% or
Base Rate, as defined by the Senior Credit Facility, plus 1.25%.
During the first nine months of 2006, the Company elected to use
LIBOR plus 2.25%. The revolving credit facility has an interest
rate that varies between LIBOR plus 1.50% and LIBOR plus 2.50%
or between Base Rate plus 0.5% and Base Rate plus 1.50% and
matures in five years. The Company has the option of electing
LIBOR or Base Rate. The Company has incurred no borrowings under
the revolving credit facility. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, the Company retired approximately
$50 million in term loan debt.
For more information about the Companys long-term debt,
refer to Note 7 Long-Term Debt in
the Companys Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the
Company used approximately $9.5 million in cash for
financing activities which included approximately
$15.4 million used for the repurchase of the Companys
Common Stock which was partially offset by proceeds from the
exercise of stock options of approximately $6.0 million.
On March 9, 2005, the Company announced that the Board
authorized the repurchase of up to 1 million shares of the
Companys outstanding Common Stock. Under the share
repurchase program, the Company was able to repurchase shares
from time to time at managements discretion in the open
market, by block purchase, in privately negotiated transactions
or as otherwise allowed by securities laws and regulations. All
shares repurchased were placed into treasury to be used for
general corporate purposes. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, the Company repurchased approximately
one million shares of its outstanding Common Stock at a cost of
approximately $15.4 million. The Company may establish new
or additional share repurchase programs. The actual number and
timing of shares to be repurchased will depend on market
conditions and certain SEC rules. Repurchase programs may be
discontinued at anytime.
The level of the Companys indebtedness could adversely
impact the Companys ability to obtain additional
financing. A substantial portion of the Companys cash flow
from operations could be dedicated to the payment of principal
and interest on its indebtedness.
The Company is subject to claims, litigation and official
billing inquiries arising in the ordinary course of its
business. These matters include pending lawsuits involving
claims that are not required to be separately described in
35
this report. The Company believes that it has meritorious
defenses to the claims and other issues asserted in such
matters; however, there can be no assurance that such matters or
any future legal matters will not have an adverse effect on the
Company. Amounts of awards or losses, if any, in pending legal
matters have not been reflected in the financial statements
unless probable and reasonably estimable.
Other than the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company has not
experienced any material changes in the underlying components of
cash generated by operating activities from continuing
operations. The Company believes that the existing cash and the
cash provided by operations will provide sufficient capital to
fund its working capital requirements, contractual requirements,
investing and financing needs.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
The Company invests excess cash in commercial paper, money
market funds and other highly liquid short-term investments. Due
to the limited amounts of these investments and their short-term
nature, the Company does not expect any fluctuation in the
prevailing interest rates to have a material effect on its
financial statements.
The Company has the option of entering into loans based on LIBOR
or on Base Rates under the Senior Credit Facility. As such, the
Company could experience fluctuations in interest rates under
the Senior Credit Facility.
In connection with the acquisition of NDCHealth on
January 6, 2006, the Company secured financing in the form
of a new Senior Credit Facility consisting of a
$435 million term loan and a $50 million revolving
credit facility. Also on January 6, 2006, the Company
entered into a four-year interest rate swap agreement, in order
to hedge against potential interest rate fluctuations resulting
from the variable interest rate under the terms of the new
senior credit facility. Pursuant to the terms of the interest
rate swap, the Company is obligated to periodically pay an
amount based on a fixed interest rate, and the Company will
receive an amount based on a variable rate. The variable rate is
based on the three-month LIBOR rate available at the time. By
entering into the interest rate swap, the Company has
effectively fixed the maximum interest rate that the Company
will pay on a portion of the outstanding balance under the
Senior Credit Facility at 4.76% per annum plus the
applicable spread, which is 225 basis points. The amount of
the Senior Credit Facility that is covered by the swap is
$125 million in years one and two, decreasing to
$100 million in year three and $75 million in year
four. The interest rate swap will terminate on December 31,
2009, unless sooner terminated pursuant to its terms.
The floating rate debt outstanding under the term loan, which is
not subject to the above referenced interest rate swap
agreement, subjects the Company to risk resulting from changes
in short-term interest rates. The potential change in annual
interest expense resulting from a hypothetical 100 basis point
change in short-term interest rates applied to the
Companys floating rate debt at September 30, 2006
would be approximately $2.6 million.
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
The majority of the Companys sales and expenses are
denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, the Company has
not experienced any significant foreign exchange gains or losses
to date. The Company conducts only limited transactions in
foreign currencies and does not expect material foreign exchange
gains or losses in the future. The Company does not engage in
any foreign exchange hedging activities.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Conclusions
Regarding Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In connection with the evaluation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures required by
Rule 13a-15(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act), the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2006,
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective to provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it
files or submits under the Exchange Act is (a) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Commissions rules and forms, and
(b) accumulated and
36
communicated to the Companys management, including its
chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Control
System Limitations; NDCHealth Material Weaknesses
It should be noted, however, that a control system, no matter
how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met. Because of the limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues within the Company have been
detected. Furthermore, the design of any control system is based
in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions, regardless of how unlikely. Because of these
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements or omissions due to error or fraud may occur and
not be detected.
It should be noted, further, that prior to the acquisition of
NDCHealth by the Company, NDCHealths former management and
its independent registered public accounting firm identified
three material weaknesses in NDCHealths
internal controls over financial reporting. A material weakness
is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies,
that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will
not be prevented or detected. As of May 27, 2005,
NDCHealths former management identified the following
material weaknesses in NDCHealths internal control over
financial reporting:
Revenue
Recognition and Billing Processes
NDCHealths former management concluded that material
weaknesses existed in documentation and procedures relating to
its revenue recognition and billing processes that resulted in
more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of
its financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
Specific control deficiencies identified relating to revenue
recognition and billing processes included:
|
|
|
|
|
The lack of policy, procedures and personnel with the skills and
experience to properly evaluate and record revenue for
multi-element arrangements, specifically relating to the
contract review process, evidence of delivery, and establishing
fair value where applicable;
|
|
|
|
Lack of controls over recording of certain credit card
transactions relating to credit card chargebacks and rejects;
|
|
|
|
Lack of controls over the authorization of credit memos and
their classification between sales allowance and bad debt;
|
|
|
|
Inconsistent management review and approval of journal entries
and account reconciliations relating to recording of unbilled
accounts receivable; and
|
|
|
|
Lack of documented controls and review procedures over timely
and accurate billing of customers.
|
Financial
Statement Close Process
NDCHealths former management also concluded that material
weaknesses existed in documentation and procedures relating to
its financial statement close process that resulted in more than
a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of its
financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
Specific control deficiencies identified relating to the
financial statement close process included:
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of adequate policies and procedures with respect to journal
entries and account reconciliations, including insufficient
supporting detail and inconsistent evidence of management review;
|
|
|
|
Lack of sufficient personnel with appropriate skills and
experience to properly prepare journal entries and account
reconciliations and to do so in a timely manner;
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of documented controls over the preparation of financial
statement footnotes and the calculation of earnings per share,
including consistent first level management review for accuracy,
completeness, and compliance with generally accepted accounting
principles; and
|
|
|
|
Lack of policy, procedures, and controls including review and
approval procedures to ensure that financial statements for
external purposes were prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles including periodic in-depth
review of the proper application of generally accepted
accounting principles to the specific facts and circumstances of
each of NDCHealths businesses.
|
Income
Taxes
NDCHealths former management also concluded that a
material weakness existed in accounting for income taxes that
resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of its financial statements would not be prevented
or detected.
Specifically, there was a lack of procedures and controls
related to the preparation and review of the tax provision
designed to ensure that the deferred tax provision and deferred
tax asset and liability balances were accurate and determined in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Remediation
Measures for Identified NDCHealth Material
Weaknesses
Prior to the acquisition, NDCHealths former management
undertook steps designed to remediate the weaknesses described
above, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The NDCHealth account reconciliation process was redesigned to
provide better support for account balances and to ensure all
significant accounts were reconciled as a part of the quarter
end close process;
|
|
|
|
Addition of accounting staff with the technical accounting skill
and experience to review and properly record revenue for
complex, multi-element agreements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
Performing daily reconciliations of credit card transactions;
|
|
|
|
Enforcing company policy on authorization of credit memos and
the completeness of information needed for proper classification;
|
|
|
|
Expanding analytic and review procedures at each quarter end in
support of footnote disclosures;
|
|
|
|
Providing more focus on income taxes; and
|
|
|
|
Implementing a
cash-on-delivery
recognition process with regard to revenue recognition in the
physician practice management services and the pharmaceutical
information businesses.
|
Further, a portion of the material weakness regarding revenue
recognition and billing processes was attributable to the
pharmaceutical information business which was sold to Wolters
Kluwer Health prior to the Companys acquisition of
NDCHealth. In addition, the Company has implemented changes to
the internal control structure of the acquired business
operations as set forth below under the caption Changes in
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
While the Companys management believes that the material
weaknesses previously identified with respect to the internal
controls of the acquired business operations have been
remediated sufficiently to make the conclusion set forth above
regarding the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures, it should be noted that the Company has
not fully tested the effectiveness of internal controls within
the acquired business operations, and, therefore, there can be
no assurance that the identified internal control weaknesses
have been remediated or that additional weaknesses in such
controls will not be found upon further testing.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In connection with the evaluation of changes in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting
required by
Rule 13a-15(d)
under the Exchange Act, management identified the following
changes that occurred
38
during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
Management has devoted significant attention and resources
during the quarter to integrating NDCHealths business
practices and operations with those of the Company. The
integration of the acquired business operations into the Company
has also materially affected and is reasonably likely to
materially affect the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. For example, certain NDCHealth legacy
financial reporting processes and functions have been further
integrated with the Companys financial reporting processes
and functions. In addition, management has continued its process
of converting certain financial reporting systems, processes and
controls related to billing, revenue recognition and accounts
receivable.
PART II:
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The information required by this Item is included in
Note 6 Legal Matters of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I.
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report and the documents incorporated by reference herein
contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 (the Reform Act). Forward-looking statements
reflect managements current expectations, estimates,
projections and assumptions with respect to the future and
include, in particular, any statement relating to future
revenues, income, earnings per share, capital expenditures,
obligations, capital structure, prospects, plans and objectives.
Statements in this report and the documents incorporated by
reference herein that are not historical facts are hereby
identified as forward-looking statements for the
purpose of the safe harbor provided by the Reform Act. Words
such as estimate, project,
plan, intend, expect,
anticipate, believe, would,
should, could and similar expressions
are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which
are difficult to predict. Actual future results and trends may
differ materially from what is suggested by forward-looking
statements due to a variety of factors, including without
limitation the risks described below under the caption
Factors That May Affect Future Results of Operations,
Financial Condition or Business, and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
demand for and market acceptance of new and existing products
and services;
|
|
|
|
successful development of new products and services;
|
|
|
|
the timing of new product and service introductions;
|
|
|
|
pricing pressures and other competitive factors;
|
|
|
|
product and service obsolescence;
|
|
|
|
the ability to develop and implement new technologies and to
obtain protection for the related intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
the prospect of changes in laws and regulations governing the
Companys business;
|
|
|
|
the uncertainties of litigation; and
|
|
|
|
costs related to integrating NDCHealths business practices
and operations with those of the Company.
|
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of
this report, or in the case of documents incorporated by
reference, as of the date of those documents. The Company does
not undertake any obligation to update or publicly release any
revisions to these forward-looking
39
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events, except as required by law.
Factors
That May Affect Future Results of Operations, Financial
Condition or Business
Per-Se provides the following risk factor disclosures in
connection with its continuing efforts to qualify its written
and oral forward-looking statements for the safe harbor
protection of the Reform Act and any other similar safe harbor
provisions. In addition to the matters addressed above in the
section entitled Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements, the following important
factors currently known to management could cause actual results
to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements.
As discussed above in Item 1, on January 6, 2006,
Per-Se completed its acquisition of NDCHealth. These risk factor
disclosures include a number of risk factors relating to that
acquisition.
The
Companys businesses are highly competitive, and an
inability to successfully compete for business could adversely
affect the Company.
The physician receivables management outsourcing business is
highly competitive. The Company competes with regional and local
physician reimbursement organizations as well as physician
groups that provide their own business management services
in-house. Potential industry and market changes that could
adversely affect the Companys ability to compete for
receivables management outsourcing services include an increase
in the number of local, regional or national competitors
providing comparable services and new alliances between
healthcare providers and third-party payers in which healthcare
providers are employed by such third-party payers.
The business of providing services and solutions to hospitals
for both revenue cycle and resource management is also highly
competitive. The Company competes with traditional electronic
data interface companies, outsourcing companies and specialized
software vendors with national, regional and local bases. Some
competitors have longer operating histories and greater
financial, technical and marketing resources than us. The
Companys successful competition within this industry is
dependent on industry and market changes.
The business of providing value-added claims processing and pre-
and post-editing services to retail pharmacies is highly
competitive. The Company competes not only with independent
providers of similar systems and services, but also with
customers and potential customers internal resources
that provide similar services. Successful competition within
this industry is dependent on a number of industry and market
conditions including functionality of products and services,
price, quality and innovation. In addition, some of the
Companys competitors may have greater access to capital
and marketing and technological resources, and the Company
cannot guarantee that it will be able to compete successfully
with them.
The
markets for the Companys services and solutions are
characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry
standards and frequent new product introductions and an
inability to keep pace could adversely affect the
Company.
The markets for the Companys services and solutions are
characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry
standards and frequent new product introductions. The
Companys ability to keep pace with changes in the
healthcare industry may be dependent on a variety of factors,
including the Companys ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
enhance existing products and services;
|
|
|
|
introduce new products and services quickly and cost effectively;
|
|
|
|
achieve market acceptance for new products and services; and
|
|
|
|
respond to emerging industry standards and other technological
changes.
|
Competitors may develop competitive products that could
adversely affect the Companys operating results. It is
possible that the Company will be unsuccessful in refining,
enhancing and developing the Companys technology. The
costs associated with refining, enhancing and developing these
systems may increase significantly in the future.
40
Existing software and technology may become obsolete as a result
of ongoing technological developments in the marketplace.
The
healthcare marketplace is characterized by consolidation, which
may result in fewer potential customers for the Companys
services.
In general, consolidation initiatives in the healthcare
marketplace may result in fewer potential customers for the
Companys services. Some of these types of initiatives
include employer initiatives such as creating group purchasing
cooperatives (GPOs); provider initiatives, such as
risk-sharing among healthcare providers and managed care
companies through capitated contracts; and integration among
hospitals and physicians into comprehensive delivery systems.
Consolidation of management and billing services through
integrated delivery systems may result in a decrease in demand
for the Companys business management outsourcing services
for particular physician practices. In addition, consolidation
among the Companys customers may result in such customers
having greater leverage, which could adversely affect the price
the Company is able to charge for the Companys products.
The
healthcare industry is highly regulated, which may increase the
Companys costs of operation or have a material adverse
effect on the Companys businesses.
The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to
changing political, economic and regulatory influences. Federal
and state legislatures have periodically considered programs to
reform or amend the U.S. healthcare system at both the
federal and state level and to change healthcare financing and
reimbursement systems, such as the Balanced Budget Act of 1997
and the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003. These programs may contain proposals
to increase governmental involvement in healthcare, lower
reimbursement rates or otherwise change the environment in which
healthcare industry participants operate. Current or future
government regulations or healthcare reform measures may affect
the Companys businesses. Healthcare industry participants
may respond by reducing their investments or postponing
investment decisions, including investments in the
Companys products and services.
Medical billing and collection activities are governed by
numerous federal and state civil and criminal laws. Federal and
state regulators use these laws to investigate healthcare
providers and companies that provide billing and collection
services, or that provide consulting services in connection with
billing and collection activities. Such laws also could
potentially be used to bring enforcement actions against
companies like Per-Se that provide software and other services
used by healthcare providers to support their billing and
collection activities. In connection with these laws, the
Company may be subjected to federal or state government
investigations and possible penalties may be imposed upon us,
false claims actions may have to be defended, private payers may
file claims against us, and the Company may be excluded from
Medicare, Medicaid or other government-funded healthcare
programs. In the past, Per-Se has been the subject of federal
investigations relating to the Companys billing and
collection activities, and the Company may become the subject of
future false claims litigation or additional investigations. Any
such proceeding or investigation could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys businesses.
The federal anti-kickback law prohibits any person or entity
from offering, paying, soliciting or receiving anything of
value, directly or indirectly, for the referral of patients
covered by Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare
programs or the leasing, purchasing, ordering or arranging for,
or recommending the lease, purchase, order or arrangement for,
any item, good, facility or service covered by these programs.
The anti-kickback law is broad and may apply to some of the
Companys activities and its relationships with customers
or business partners. Penalties for violating the anti-kickback
law include imprisonment, fines and exclusion from
participating, directly or indirectly, in Medicare, Medicaid and
other federal healthcare programs. Many states have similar
anti-kickback laws that are not necessarily limited to items or
services for which payment is made by a federal healthcare
program. The Company carefully reviews its business practices in
an effort to ensure that it complies with all applicable laws.
However, the laws in this area are both broad and vague and it
is often difficult or impossible to determine precisely how the
laws will be applied. Any determination by a state or federal
regulatory agency that any of these practices violate any of
these laws could subject us to civil or criminal penalties and
require us to change or terminate some portions of the
Companys businesses.
41
Numerous federal and state civil and criminal laws govern the
collection, use, storage and disclosure of health information
for the purpose of safeguarding the privacy and security of such
information. Federal or state governments may impose penalties
for noncompliance, both criminal and civil. Persons who believe
their health information has been misused or disclosed
improperly may bring claims against the Company or the
Companys customers seeking monetary damages.
Under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (HIPAA), final rules have been published
regarding standards for electronic transactions as well as
standards for privacy and security of individually identifiable
health information. The HIPAA rules set new or higher standards
for the healthcare industry in handling healthcare transactions
and information, with penalties for noncompliance. The Company
has incurred and will continue to incur costs to comply with
these rules. Although management believes that future compliance
costs will not have a material impact on the Companys
results of operations, compliance with these rules may prove to
be more costly than anticipated. Failure to comply with such
rules may have a material adverse effect on the Companys
businesses and may subject us to civil and criminal penalties as
well as loss of customers.
Per-Se relies upon third parties to provide data elements to
process electronic medical claims in a HIPAA-compliant format.
While Per-Se believes it is fully and properly prepared to
process electronic medical claims in a HIPAA-compliant format,
there can be no assurance that third parties, including
healthcare providers and payers, will likewise be prepared to
supply all the data elements required to process electronic
medical claims and make electronic remittance under HIPAAs
standards. If payers reject electronic medical claims and such
claims are processed manually rather than electronically, there
could be a material adverse affect on the Companys
businesses. The Company has made and expects to continue to make
investments in product enhancements to support customer
operations that are regulated by HIPAA. Responding to
HIPAAs impact may require us to make investments in new
products or charge higher prices.
Passage of HIPAA is part of a wider healthcare reform
initiative. The Company expects that the debate on healthcare
reform will continue. The Company also expects that the federal
government as well as state governments will pass laws and issue
regulations addressing healthcare issues and reimbursement of
healthcare providers. We cannot predict whether the government
will enact new legislation and regulations, and, if enacted,
whether such new developments will affect the Companys
businesses.
Payment restrictions by governmental and private payers and the
use of measures such as payment bundling, medical necessity
edits, and post-payment audits may decrease revenue to the
Companys provider clients and consequently, decrease
revenue derived by the Company and increase the cost of services.
The
trading price of the Companys common stock may be volatile
and may negatively affect your investment.
The trading price of Per-Se common stock may be volatile. The
market for Per-Se common stock may experience significant price
and volume fluctuations in response to a number of factors
including actual or anticipated quarterly variations in
operating results, changes in expectations of future financial
performance or changes in estimates of securities analysts,
government regulatory action, healthcare reform measures, client
relationship developments and other factors, many of which are
beyond the Companys control. Furthermore, the stock market
in general and the market for software, healthcare business
services and high technology companies in particular, has
experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the
operating performance of particular companies. These broad
market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the
trading price of the Companys common stock, regardless of
actual operating performance.
Per-Se
has significantly increased its long-term debt as a result of
the NDCHealth acquisition, which could limit funds available to
Per-Se to finance other activities.
Per-Se has increased its long-term debt from approximately
$125 million to approximately $510 million. If unable
to make the required debt payments, Per-Se could be required to
reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell certain assets,
restructure or refinance its indebtedness, or seek additional
equity capital. The ability of Per-Se to make payments on its
debt obligations will depend on the Companys future
operating performance, which may be affected by conditions
beyond the Companys control.
42
The
agreements governing Per-Ses debt limit the Companys
financial and operating flexibility.
Per-Ses debt agreements contain restrictive covenants that
limit its financial and operating flexibility. Those agreements
contain restrictions regarding, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incurring additional indebtedness or guarantee obligations;
|
|
|
|
declaring or paying dividends and other distributions;
|
|
|
|
prepaying or modifying the terms of indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
creating liens;
|
|
|
|
making capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
making investments or acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
entering into acquisitions or consolidations;
|
|
|
|
making sales of assets; and
|
|
|
|
engaging in transactions with affiliates.
|
In addition, Per-Se is required to comply with specified
financial covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio, a
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a minimum interest
expense ratio.
The covenants summarized above could place Per-Se at a
disadvantage compared to some of its competitors, which may have
fewer restrictive covenants and may not be required to operate
under these restrictions.
Loss
of key management could adversely affect the Companys
business.
The success of Per-Se is materially dependent upon its key
managers and, in particular, upon the continued services of
Philip M. Pead, Per-Ses Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer. In addition, Per-Se does not carry key
employee insurance on Mr. Pead or other members of
management. The combined companys future business and
financial results could be adversely affected if the services of
Mr. Pead or other key managers cease to be available.
Per-Se
may be unable to successfully integrate the businesses of Per-Se
and NDCHealth and may be unable to realize the anticipated
benefits of the acquisition.
Per-Se is required to devote significant management attention
and resources to integrating NDCHealths business practices
and operations with those of Per-Se. Potential difficulties that
the Company may encounter in the integration process include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to achieve the cost savings and operating
synergies anticipated in the acquisition, including a reduction
in costs associated with the acquisition;
|
|
|
|
complexities associated with managing the geographic scope of
the combined businesses, coupled with those of consolidating
multiple physical locations where management may determine
consolidation is desirable;
|
|
|
|
integrating personnel from diverse corporate cultures while
maintaining focus on providing consistent, high quality customer
service; and
|
|
|
|
potential unknown liabilities and increased costs associated
with the acquisition.
|
The process of integrating operations could cause a disruption
of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of the combined
business, the loss of key personnel
and/or the
loss of key or large customers. In addition, customer contracts
of NDCHealth contain provisions that may permit the customer to
terminate the contract as a result of the acquisition. The
diversion of managements attention and any delays or
difficulties encountered in connection with the integration of
the two companies operations could have an adverse effect
on business and financial results.
43
The integration process may result in additional and unforeseen
expenses, and the anticipated benefits of such integration plans
may not be realized.
If
Per-Se is unable to manage its growth profitably, its business
and financial results could suffer.
Over the past several years, each of Per-Se and NDCHealth has
engaged in the identification of and competition for, growth and
expansion opportunities. The Companys future financial
results depend in part on managing growth profitably. Management
needs to maintain existing customers and attract new customers,
recruit, train, retain and effectively manage employees as well
as expand operations, customer support and financial control
systems. If Per-Se is unable to manage its growth profitably,
its business and financial results could suffer.
As
part of the acquisition, Per-Se and NDCHealth entered into, and
are bound by the terms of, long-term data sharing agreements
with Wolters Kluwer that place certain restrictions on the
Companys ability to sell certain products to third parties
and compete in certain markets.
In connection with the completion of the acquisition and the
related sale of NDCHealths information management business
to Wolters Kluwer, Per-Se and NDCHealth entered into long-term
data sharing agreements with Wolters Kluwer, pursuant to which
Per-Se and NDCHealth will share with, and receive from Wolters
Kluwer, certain specified information used in their respective
businesses for the consideration specified in these agreements.
Those agreements provide, among other things, that Per-Se and
NDCHealth will sell certain information exclusively to Wolters
Kluwer, and that neither Per-Se nor NDCHealth will compete with
Wolters Kluwer with respect to certain uses of data purchased
by, or sold by, Wolters Kluwer in specified markets for various
time periods set forth in those agreements. In addition, the
stock purchase agreement with Wolters Kluwer prohibits NDCHealth
from competing with Wolters Kluwer in the provision of certain
products and services to specified markets traditionally served
by NDCHealths information management business for five
years from the closing of that transaction. These restrictions
and limitations will limit the types of products and customers
to whom the Company can market such products and could have a
material and adverse impact on the Companys operating and
financial results.
Additionally, because the healthcare marketplace is rapidly
changing, it is difficult to predict whether the data sharing
agreements will be favorable to us over the full
20-year term
of the agreements. In the event those agreements prove to be
unfavorable to us, they could have a long-term negative impact
on the Companys results of operations.
The
Company is regularly involved in litigation, which may expose it
to significant liabilities.
The Company is involved in litigation arising in the ordinary
course of business, which may expose it to loss contingencies.
These matters include, but are not limited to, claims brought by
former customers with respect to the operation of the
Companys businesses. The Company has also received written
demands from customers and former customers that have not yet
resulted in legal action.
NDCHealth is a named defendant in certain other lawsuits,
including a putative securities
class-action
lawsuit, captioned Garfield v. NDCHealth Corporation, et.
al. The complaint in that action generally alleged, among other
things, that members of a purported class of stockholders who
purchased NDCHealth common stock between August 21, 2002,
and August 9, 2004, were damaged as a result of
(i) improper revenue recognition practices in
NDCHealths physician business unit; (ii) the failure
to timely write-down NDCHealths investment in MedUnite;
and (iii) the improper capitalization and amortization of
costs associated with software development. The second amended
complaint alleges that, as a result of such conduct,
NDCHealths previously issued financial statements were
materially false and misleading, thereby causing the price of
NDCHealths common stock to be inflated artificially. The
second amended complaint asserts violations of certain
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), and
Rule 10b-5
thereunder, and seeks unspecified monetary damages and other
relief. A U.S. federal district court judge granted
NDCHealths motion to dismiss these claims on July 27,
2005. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed that
dismissal; however, the plaintiffs retain their rights to file a
motion for rehearing en banc with the Eleventh Circuit
and/or to
appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
44
NDCHealth is also a defendant in a private securities lawsuit
filed by MMI Investments, a former stockholder of NDCHealth.
This lawsuit is generally based on the same allegations
contained in the securities
class-action
lawsuit. The parties to this lawsuit are currently engaged in
discovery.
The Company may not be able to successfully resolve such legal
matters, or other legal matters that may arise in the future. In
the event of an adverse outcome with respect to such legal
matters or other legal matters in which the Company may become
involved, the Companys insurance coverage may not fully
cover resulting losses. Although the Company maintains insurance
coverage in amounts that the Company believes are sufficient,
such coverage may prove to be inadequate or may become
unavailable on acceptable terms, if at all. A successful claim
brought against the Company that is uninsured or under-insured,
could materially harm the Companys businesses, results of
operations or financial condition.
Per-Se
and NDCHealth are each the subject of separate SEC
investigations, the resolution of which could have a material
adverse effect on the combined companies.
On April 4, 2005, Per-Se announced that it had been
notified by the SEC staff of the issuance of an order of
investigation, which Per-Se believes relates to allegations of
wrongdoing made by a former employee in 2003. These allegations
were the subject of a prior investigation by the audit committee
of Per-Ses board of directors and an outside accounting
firm that resulted in the performance of extensive additional
procedures. Per-Se has produced documents and provided testimony
relating to these allegations to the SEC.
On December 14, 2004, the SEC staff obtained a formal order
of investigation relating to certain NDCHealth accounting
matters. NDCHealth restated its financial statements for the
fiscal years ended May 28, 2004, May 30, 2003, and
May 31, 2002, to correct errors relating to these
accounting matters. NDCHealth produced documents relating to the
restatement to the SEC, and the SEC took the testimony of a
number of current and former employees in relation to its
investigation.
Responding to these investigations requires significant defense
costs, attention and resources of management. Either or both
companies could face civil or criminal penalties that could have
a material adverse effect on the combined companies.
Prior
to its acquisition by Per-Se, NDCHealth identified material
weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If
such deficiencies persist or if additional weaknesses are
discovered, the combined company may not be able to accurately
report its financial results and management may not be able to
conclude that the Companys internal control over financial
reporting is effective.
NDCHealths former management and its independent
registered public accounting firm identified three
material weaknesses in its internal control over
financial reporting. A material weakness is a control
deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results
in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of
the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented
or detected. As of May 27, 2005, the date of
NDCHealths former fiscal year end, NDCHealths former
management concluded that NDCHealths documentation and
procedures relating to (1) the revenue recognition and
billing processes, (2) the financial statement close
process and (3) NDCHealths accounting for income
taxes resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the financial statements would not be prevented
or detected. For a more detailed description of these identified
weaknesses see Part I, Item 4., Controls and
Procedures, above.
Prior to the acquisition, NDCHealths former management
undertook steps designed to remediate the weaknesses discussed
above, and, subsequent to the acquisition, the Company has
implemented changes to the internal control structure of the
acquired business operations as set forth above in Part I,
Item 4 under the caption Changes in Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting. Further, a portion of the
material weakness regarding revenue recognition and billing
processes was attributable to the pharmaceutical information
business that was sold to Wolters Kluwer Health prior to the
acquisition. While the Companys management believes that
the material weaknesses previously identified with respect to
the internal control of the acquired business operations have
been remediated sufficiently to make the conclusion set forth in
Part I, Item 4 regarding the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures, it should be
noted that the Company has not fully tested the effectiveness of
internal control within the acquired business operations, and,
therefore, there can be no assurance that the identified
weaknesses have been remediated or that additional weaknesses in
such controls will not be found upon further testing.
45
Any such weaknesses could result in a material misstatement of
the Companys financial statements and could adversely
impact the accuracy and future timeliness of the Companys
financial reports filed pursuant to the Exchange Act. As a
result, current and potential stockholders could lose confidence
in the Companys financial reporting, which could harm the
trading price of the Companys common stock.
(A) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Document
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of August 26, 2005, among Registrant, Royal Merger
Co. and NDCHealth Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 30, 2005). (schedules and similar
attachments to this exhibit have not been filed; Registrant
agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any of these
materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request).
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as
of August 26, 2005, among Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., NDC
Health Information Services (Arizona). Inc., and NDCHealth
Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to NDCHealth Corporations Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on August 29, 2005). (schedules and similar
attachments to this exhibit have not been filed; Registrant
agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any of these
materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Restated By-laws of Registrant, as
amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 29, 2005).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of
February 11, 1999, between Registrant and American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company (including form of rights
certificates). (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 12, 1999).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Rights
Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999, between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered
into as of May 4, 2000 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to Quarterly Report of
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2000).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Rights
Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999, between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered
into as of December 6, 2001, to be effective as of
March 6, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.12 to Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001).
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Rights
Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999, between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered
into as of March 10, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.13 to Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002).
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Rights
Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999, between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered
into as of February 18, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 22, 2005).
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Rights
Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999, between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered
into as of August 26, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 26, 2005).
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Indenture dated as of
June 30, 2004, between Registrant and U.S. Bank
National Association, as Trustee, relating to Registrants
3.25% Convertible Subordinated Debentures Due 2024
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a).
and
15d-14(a).,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a).
and
15d-14(a).,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Per-Se Technologies, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Stephen
M. Scheppmann
|
Stephen M. Scheppmann
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Richard A. Flynt
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: November 8, 2006
47
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Document
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of August 26, 2005, among Registrant, Royal Merger
Co. and NDCHealth Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 30, 2005) (schedules and similar
attachments to this exhibit have not been filed; Registrant
agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any of these
materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request).
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as
of August 26, 2005, among Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., NDC
Health Information Services (Arizona) Inc., and NDCHealth
Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to NDCHealth Corporations Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on August 29, 2005) (schedules and similar
attachments to this exhibit have not been filed; Registrant
agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any of these
materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Restated By-laws of Registrant, as
amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 29, 2005).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of
February 11, 1999, between Registrant and American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company (including form of rights
certificates) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 12, 1999).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Rights
Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999, between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered
into as of May 4, 2000 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to Quarterly Report of
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2000).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Rights
Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999, between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered
into as of December 6, 2001, to be effective as of
March 6, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.12 to Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001).
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Rights
Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999, between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered
into as of March 10, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.13 to Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002).
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Rights
Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999, between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered
into as of February 18, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 22, 2005).
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Rights
Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999, between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered
into as of August 26, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 26, 2005).
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Indenture dated as of
June 30, 2004, between Registrant and U.S. Bank
National Association, as Trustee, relating to Registrants
3.25% Convertible Subordinated Debentures Due 2024
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)
and
15d-14(a),
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)
and
15d-14(a),
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|