SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
Commission File Number 1-10312
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
GEORGIA
|
|
58-1134883 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
1111 Bay Avenue, Suite # 500
P.O. Box 120
Columbus, Georgia 31902
(Address of principal executive offices)
(706) 649-2311
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12B-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers class of common stock, as of the
latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
July 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
330,148,536 shares |
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
674,834 |
|
|
|
682,583 |
|
Interest earning deposits with banks |
|
|
17,337 |
|
|
|
10,950 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
152,177 |
|
|
|
76,086 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
20,204 |
|
|
|
17,803 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value |
|
|
185,245 |
|
|
|
153,437 |
|
Impaired loans held for sale |
|
|
6,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
3,814,384 |
|
|
|
3,666,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
27,445,891 |
|
|
|
26,498,585 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(417,813 |
) |
|
|
(367,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
27,028,078 |
|
|
|
26,130,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
581,352 |
|
|
|
547,437 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
492,138 |
|
|
|
519,138 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
24,860 |
|
|
|
28,007 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,230,327 |
|
|
|
1,185,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
34,227,301 |
|
|
|
33,018,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing retail and commercial deposits |
|
$ |
3,553,342 |
|
|
|
3,472,423 |
|
Interest bearing retail and commercial deposits |
|
|
17,887,708 |
|
|
|
17,734,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail and commercial deposits |
|
|
21,441,050 |
|
|
|
21,207,274 |
|
Brokered deposits ($90,722 and $293,842 at fair value as of June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007) |
|
|
4,587,302 |
|
|
|
3,752,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
26,028,352 |
|
|
|
24,959,816 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,287,910 |
|
|
|
2,319,412 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,121,625 |
|
|
|
1,890,235 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
336,731 |
|
|
|
407,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
30,774,618 |
|
|
|
29,576,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
24,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $1.00 par value. Authorized 600,000,000 shares;
issued 335,825,867 in 2008 and 335,529,482 in 2007; outstanding
330,153,646 in 2008 and 329,867,944 in 2007 |
|
|
335,826 |
|
|
|
335,529 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,110,635 |
|
|
|
1,101,209 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost - 5,672,221 shares in 2008 and 5,661,538 shares in
2007 |
|
|
(114,075 |
) |
|
|
(113,944 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
30,190 |
|
|
|
31,439 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,066,015 |
|
|
|
2,087,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
3,428,591 |
|
|
|
3,441,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
34,227,301 |
|
|
|
33,018,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
863,959 |
|
|
|
1,018,364 |
|
|
|
408,653 |
|
|
|
516,307 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
91,042 |
|
|
|
83,373 |
|
|
|
45,886 |
|
|
|
42,920 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
3,997 |
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
|
|
2,301 |
|
|
|
2,522 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
Interest earning deposits with banks |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
962,020 |
|
|
|
1,112,391 |
|
|
|
458,140 |
|
|
|
564,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
342,726 |
|
|
|
460,334 |
|
|
|
155,546 |
|
|
|
234,268 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase
agreements |
|
|
29,480 |
|
|
|
42,198 |
|
|
|
11,650 |
|
|
|
21,619 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
37,744 |
|
|
|
38,435 |
|
|
|
17,523 |
|
|
|
20,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
409,950 |
|
|
|
540,967 |
|
|
|
184,719 |
|
|
|
276,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
552,070 |
|
|
|
571,424 |
|
|
|
273,421 |
|
|
|
288,475 |
|
Provision for losses on loans |
|
|
184,665 |
|
|
|
40,797 |
|
|
|
93,616 |
|
|
|
20,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans |
|
|
367,405 |
|
|
|
530,627 |
|
|
|
179,805 |
|
|
|
268,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
54,461 |
|
|
|
54,420 |
|
|
|
26,070 |
|
|
|
28,050 |
|
Fiduciary and asset management fees |
|
|
25,519 |
|
|
|
25,129 |
|
|
|
12,898 |
|
|
|
12,657 |
|
Brokerage and investment banking income |
|
|
17,693 |
|
|
|
15,259 |
|
|
|
9,206 |
|
|
|
7,809 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
13,847 |
|
|
|
14,920 |
|
|
|
5,686 |
|
|
|
7,695 |
|
Bankcard fees |
|
|
26,417 |
|
|
|
23,447 |
|
|
|
14,198 |
|
|
|
11,567 |
|
Net gains on sales of available for sale investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
Other fee income |
|
|
21,266 |
|
|
|
19,838 |
|
|
|
10,081 |
|
|
|
10,411 |
|
Proceeds from sale of MasterCard shares |
|
|
16,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemption of Visa shares |
|
|
38,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
33,744 |
|
|
|
30,116 |
|
|
|
13,373 |
|
|
|
17,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
247,675 |
|
|
|
183,834 |
|
|
|
107,698 |
|
|
|
96,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and other personnel expense |
|
|
232,614 |
|
|
|
229,749 |
|
|
|
110,483 |
|
|
|
115,822 |
|
Net occupancy and equipment expense |
|
|
61,340 |
|
|
|
54,860 |
|
|
|
31,130 |
|
|
|
27,572 |
|
FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees |
|
|
12,250 |
|
|
|
4,698 |
|
|
|
6,172 |
|
|
|
2,315 |
|
Impaired loans held for sale and other real estate |
|
|
31,502 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
23,621 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees |
|
|
16,697 |
|
|
|
10,245 |
|
|
|
11,756 |
|
|
|
4,743 |
|
Visa litigation expense |
|
|
(17,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
103,365 |
|
|
|
91,755 |
|
|
|
55,802 |
|
|
|
46,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
467,338 |
|
|
|
392,457 |
|
|
|
265,964 |
|
|
|
197,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
146,045 |
|
|
|
322,004 |
|
|
|
21,401 |
|
|
|
166,864 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
52,952 |
|
|
|
115,789 |
|
|
|
9,302 |
|
|
|
61,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
93,093 |
|
|
|
206,215 |
|
|
|
12,099 |
|
|
|
105,809 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
93,093 |
|
|
|
309,502 |
|
|
|
12,099 |
|
|
|
162,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
329,071 |
|
|
|
326,051 |
|
|
|
329,173 |
|
|
|
326,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
331,568 |
|
|
|
329,920 |
|
|
|
331,418 |
|
|
|
330,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
hensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Issued |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
331,214 |
|
|
$ |
331,214 |
|
|
|
1,033,055 |
|
|
|
(113,944 |
) |
|
|
(2,129 |
) |
|
|
2,460,454 |
|
|
|
3,708,650 |
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN No. 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,502 |
|
|
|
309,502 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of
tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,917 |
) |
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on
investment securities available for
sale, net of reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,047 |
) |
Gain on foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared $0.41 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,124 |
) |
|
|
(134,124 |
) |
Issuance of non-vested stock |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,126 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
31,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,550 |
|
Share-based tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
Ownership change at majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,793 |
|
Issuance of common stock for acquisition |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
333,078 |
|
|
$ |
333,078 |
|
|
|
1,091,517 |
|
|
|
(113,944 |
) |
|
|
(20,929 |
) |
|
|
2,635,602 |
|
|
|
3,925,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
335,529 |
|
|
$ |
335,529 |
|
|
|
1,101,209 |
|
|
|
(113,944 |
) |
|
|
31,439 |
|
|
|
2,087,357 |
|
|
|
3,441,590 |
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of EITF
Issue No. 06-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,248 |
) |
|
|
(2,248 |
) |
Cumulative effect of adoption of SFAS No.
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,093 |
|
|
|
93,093 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of
tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
Change in unrealized losses on
investment securities available for
sale, net of reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
Amortization of post-retirement unfunded
health benefit, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared $0.34 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,245 |
) |
|
|
(112,245 |
) |
Treasury shares purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
Issuance of non-vested stock, net |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,675 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
Share-based tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
335,826 |
|
|
$ |
335,826 |
|
|
|
1,110,635 |
|
|
|
(114,075 |
) |
|
|
30,190 |
|
|
|
2,066,015 |
|
|
|
3,428,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
5
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
93,093 |
|
|
|
309,502 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for losses on loans |
|
|
184,665 |
|
|
|
40,797 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net |
|
|
27,715 |
|
|
|
89,405 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of equity method investments |
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
(3,237 |
) |
Deferred tax expense |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
(15,343 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable |
|
|
59,348 |
|
|
|
(9,479 |
) |
Decrease in interest payable |
|
|
(33,283 |
) |
|
|
(1,278 |
) |
Minority interest in subsidiaries net income |
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
24,465 |
|
Increase in trading account assets |
|
|
(2,401 |
) |
|
|
(55,360 |
) |
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(625,996 |
) |
|
|
(808,759 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
597,445 |
|
|
|
798,826 |
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(5,831 |
) |
|
|
(6,243 |
) |
Loss on sale of impaired loans held for sale |
|
|
10,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid and other assets |
|
|
71,989 |
|
|
|
(45,109 |
) |
Decrease in accrued salaries and benefits |
|
|
(20,676 |
) |
|
|
(77,628 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
35,846 |
|
|
|
(20,980 |
) |
Net gains on sales of available for sale investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(705 |
) |
Increase in fair value of private equity investments |
|
|
(4,946 |
) |
|
|
(4,245 |
) |
Gain from transfer of mutual funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,885 |
) |
Gain on sale of MasterCard shares |
|
|
(16,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemption of Visa shares |
|
|
(38,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in liability for Visa litigation |
|
|
(17,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
15,143 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
(7,398 |
) |
Impairment of developed software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
|
|
17,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
348,187 |
|
|
|
234,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in interest earning deposits with banks |
|
|
(6,387 |
) |
|
|
14,232 |
|
Net increase in federal funds sold
and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
(76,091 |
) |
|
|
(140,594 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities and principal collections of
investment securities available for sale |
|
|
669,286 |
|
|
|
376,654 |
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
21,501 |
|
Purchases of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(817,795 |
) |
|
|
(642,529 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of impaired loans held for sale |
|
|
20,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(1,290,126 |
) |
|
|
(934,359 |
) |
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(63,012 |
) |
|
|
(76,095 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals of premises and equipment |
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
Net proceeds from transfer of mutual funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,958 |
|
Proceeds from sale of MasterCard shares |
|
|
16,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemption of Visa shares |
|
|
38,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
Contract acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,542 |
) |
Additions to licensed computer software from vendors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,866 |
) |
Additions to internally developed computer software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(1,503,360 |
) |
|
|
(1,397,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in demand and savings deposits |
|
|
230,526 |
|
|
|
549,601 |
|
Net increase in certificates of deposit |
|
|
838,010 |
|
|
|
153,838 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased
and other securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
(31,502 |
) |
|
|
213,378 |
|
Principal repayments on long-term debt |
|
|
(38,041 |
) |
|
|
(201,845 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
270,300 |
|
|
|
529,313 |
|
Treasury shares purchased |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
7,398 |
|
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(123,744 |
) |
|
|
(130,482 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
33,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,147,424 |
|
|
|
1,154,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalent
balances held in foreign currencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and due from banks |
|
|
(7,749 |
) |
|
|
(7,631 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
682,583 |
|
|
|
889,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
674,834 |
|
|
|
882,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary
for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All adjustments consisting of normally
recurring accruals that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial position and results of operations for the periods covered by this report have been
included. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the Synovus Financial Corp. (Synovus) consolidated financial statements and
related notes appearing in the 2007 Annual Report previously filed on Form 10-K.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the respective balance sheets, and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to
significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses,
the valuation of impaired loans held for sale, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection
with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans and the fair value of intangible assets, including
goodwill.
A substantial portion of Synovus loans are secured by real estate in five southeastern states
(Georgia, Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, and Tennessee). Accordingly, the ultimate
collectibility of a substantial portion of Synovus loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in
market conditions in these areas. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is
adequate. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future
additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition,
various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review
Synovus allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require Synovus to make changes to the
allowance for loan losses based on their judgment about information available to them at the time
of their examination.
Synovus conducted its annual assessment of goodwill for impairment during the three months ended
June 30, 2008. Determining the fair value of Synovus reporting units requires management to make
certain judgments and assumptions related to various items, including discount rates, future
estimates of operating results, etc. Management believes that the
estimates and assumptions used in
the goodwill impairment analysis for its business units are
reasonable; however, if actual results
and market conditions differ from the assumptions or estimates used, the fair value of each
reporting unit could be different in the future.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted in 2008.
7
Note 2 Supplemental Cash Flow Information
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Synovus paid income taxes (net of refunds
received) of $56.4 million and $191.0 million, respectively. The amount for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 is impacted by tax overpayment credits from 2007 that were applied towards the 2008
income tax liability. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Synovus paid interest of
$372.9 million and $530.3 million, respectively.
Non-cash investing activities consisted of loans of approximately $171.3 million and $23.0 million,
which were foreclosed and transferred to other real estate during the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively, and impaired loans of approximately $42.3 million which were
transferred to impaired loans held for sale during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Note 3 Comprehensive Income
Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the change in net unrealized gains (losses) on cash
flow hedges, the change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for
sale, gains (losses) on foreign currency translation, and the amortization of the post-retirement
unfunded health benefit. Comprehensive income consists of net income plus other comprehensive
income (loss).
Comprehensive income (loss) for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
93,093 |
|
|
|
309,502 |
|
|
|
12,099 |
|
|
|
162,750 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net
of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains
(losses) on cash flow hedges |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
(2,917 |
) |
|
|
(11,825 |
) |
|
|
(4,428 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gains
(losses) on investment securities
available for sale, net of
reclassification adjustment |
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
|
|
(18,047 |
) |
|
|
(50,107 |
) |
|
|
(25,741 |
) |
Gains on foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
Amortization of postretirement
unfunded health benefit, net of tax |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
|
|
(18,800 |
) |
|
|
(61,886 |
) |
|
|
(27,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
91,844 |
|
|
|
290,702 |
|
|
|
(49,787 |
) |
|
|
134,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Impaired Loans Held for Sale
Loans or pools of loans are transferred to the impaired loans held for sale portfolio when the
intent to hold the loans has changed due to portfolio management or risk mitigation strategies and
when there is a plan to sell the loans within a reasonable period of time. The value of the loans
or pools of loans is primarily determined by analyzing the underlying collateral of the loan and
the external market prices of similar assets. At the time of transfer, if the fair value is less
than the cost, the difference attributable to declines in credit quality is recorded as a
charge-off against the allowance for loan losses. Decreases in fair value subsequent to the
transfer as well as losses from sale of these loans are recognized as a component of non-interest
expense. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, Synovus transferred loans with a cost basis
totaling
8
$63.3 million to the impaired loans held for sale portfolio. At the time of the transfer, Synovus
recognized a $21.0 million charge-off on these loans, which resulted in a new cost basis of $42.3
million at March 31, 2008. The $21.0 million charge-off was estimated based on the estimated sales
price of the portfolio through bulk sales. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus
recognized a loss of $4.7 million from the sale of impaired loans held for sale and recognized
additional write-downs of $5.4 million on the loans remaining in the portfolio. The $5.4 million
write-down was based upon the estimated sales proceeds from a pending liquidation sale.
Note 5 Other Real Estate
Other real estate, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of
loans, is reported at the lower of cost or fair value, determined on the basis of current
appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent
sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan
balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against
the allowance for loan losses. Gains or losses on sale and any subsequent adjustments to the value
are recorded as a component of non-interest expense.
The carrying value of other real estate was $197.3 million and $101.5 million at June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2008,
approximately $169.8 million of loans and $1.5 million of impaired loans held for sale were
foreclosed and transferred to other real estate. The increased in other real estate is the result
of negative migration in credit quality, the declining value of real estate in certain parts of
Florida and the excess supply of residential real estate in the Atlanta area. During the six and
three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus recognized other real
estate costs of $21.4 million and
$13.5 million, respectively. These costs primarily relate to losses from the liquidation of other
real estate through bulk sales and auctions as well as further write-downs due to declines in fair
value subsequent to the date of foreclosure and, to a lesser degree,
carrying costs associated with other real estate.
Note 6 Fair Value Accounting Adoption of SFAS Nos. 157 and 159
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement does not
introduce any new requirements mandating the use of fair value; rather, it unifies the meaning of
fair value and adds additional fair value disclosures. The provisions of this statement are
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and
interim periods within those fiscal years. Effective January 1, 2008, Synovus adopted SFAS No. 157
for financial assets and liabilities. As permitted under FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2,
Synovus has elected to defer the application of SFAS No. 157 to non-financial assets and
liabilities until January 1, 2009.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No.159 permits entities to make an
irrevocable election, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments and
certain other instruments at fair value. As of January 1, 2008, Synovus has elected the fair value
option (FVO) for mortgage loans held for sale and certain callable brokered certificates of
deposit. Accordingly, a cumulative adjustment of $58 thousand ($91 thousand less $33 thousand of
income taxes) was recorded as an increase to retained earnings.
9
The following is a description of the assets and liabilities for which fair value has been elected,
including the specific reasons for electing fair value.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans held for sale (MLHFS) have been previously accounted for on a lower of aggregate
cost or fair value basis pursuant to SFAS No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking
Activities (SFAS No. 65). For certain mortgage loan types, fair value hedge accounting was
utilized by Synovus to hedge a given mortgage loan pool, and the underlying mortgage loan balances
were adjusted for the change in fair value related to the hedged risk (fluctuation in market
interest rates) in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended and interpreted (SFAS No. 133). For those certain mortgage loan types,
Synovus is still able to achieve an effective economic hedge by being able to mark-to-market the
underlying mortgage loan balances through the income statement, but has eliminated the operational
time and expense needed to manage a hedge accounting program under SFAS No. 133. Previously under
SFAS No. 65, Synovus was exposed, from an accounting perspective, only to the downside risk of
market volatilities; however by electing FVO, Synovus may now also recognize the associated gains
on the mortgage loan portfolio as favorable changes in the market occur.
Certain Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposit
Synovus has elected FVO for certain callable brokered certificates of deposit (CDs) to ease the
operational burdens required to maintain hedge accounting for such instruments under the constructs
of SFAS No. 133. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 159, Synovus was highly effective in hedging
the risk related to changes in fair value, due to fluctuations in market interest rates, by
engaging in various interest rate derivatives. However, SFAS No. 133 requires an extensive
documentation process for each hedging relationship and an extensive process related to assessing
the effectiveness and measuring ineffectiveness related to such hedges. By electing FVO on these
previously hedged callable brokered CDs, Synovus is still able to achieve an effective economic
hedge by being able to mark-to-market the underlying CDs through the income statement, but has
eliminated the operational time and expense needed to manage a hedge accounting program under SFAS
No. 133.
The following table summarizes the impact of adopting the fair value option for these financial
instruments as of January 1, 2008. Amounts shown represent the carrying value of the affected
instruments before and after the changes in accounting resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 159.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Effect |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
December |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
31, 2007 |
|
|
Gain, net |
|
|
2008 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
$ |
153,437 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
153,528 |
|
Certain callable brokered CDs |
|
|
293,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax cumulative effect of adoption of the fair value option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of the fair value option
(increase to retained earnings) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Determination of Fair Value
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid
to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset
or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS
No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements based on
significant inputs used to determine the fair value. The three levels of inputs are as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include corporate debt
and equity securities, certain derivative contracts, as well as
certain U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise
debt securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in
over-the-counter markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that
are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full
term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities
include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less
frequently than exchange-traded instruments and derivative
contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with
inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This
category generally includes certain U.S. Government-sponsored
enterprises and agency mortgage-backed debt securities,
obligations of states and municipalities, certain callable
brokered certificates of deposit, collateralized mortgage
obligations, derivative contracts, and mortgage loans
held-for-sale. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little if any market
activity for the asset or liability. Level 3 assets and
liabilities include financial instruments whose value is
determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow
methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for
which the determination of fair value requires significant
management judgment or estimation. This category primarily
includes Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock,
collateral-dependent impaired loans, and certain private equity
investments. |
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the major categories of
financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
Trading Account Assets/Liabilities and Investment Securities Available for Sale
Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are valued at the
last traded price by obtaining feeds from a number of live data sources including active
market makers and inter-dealer brokers. These securities are classified as Level 1 within
the valuation hierarchy and include U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S.
Government-sponsored enterprises, and corporate debt and equity securities. If quoted market
prices are not available, fair values are estimated by using bid prices and quoted prices of
pools or tranches of securities with similar characteristics. These types of securities are
classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy and consist of collateralized mortgage
obligations, mortgage-backed debt securities, debt securities of U.S. Government-sponsored
enterprises and agencies, and state and municipal bonds. In both cases, Synovus has
evaluated the valuation methodologies of its third party valuation providers to determine
whether such valuations are representative of an exit price in Synovus principal markets.
In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to
valuation, securities are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. These Level
3 items are primarily Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) stock.
11
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Since quoted market prices are not available, fair value is derived from a
hypothetical-securitization model used to project the exit price of the loan in
securitization. The bid pricing convention is used for loan pricing for similar assets. The
valuation model is based upon forward settlement of a pool of loans of identical coupon,
maturity, product, and credit attributes. The inputs to the model are continuously updated
with available market and historical data. As the loans are sold in the secondary market and
predominantly used as collateral for securitizations, the valuation model represents the
highest and best use of the loans in Synovus principal market. Mortgage loans held for sale
are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Private Equity Investments
Private equity investments consist primarily of investments in venture capital funds. The
valuation of these instruments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of
quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of such assets.
Based on these factors, the ultimate realizable value of private equity investments could
differ significantly from the values reflected in the accompanying financial statements.
Private equity investments are valued initially based upon transaction price. Thereafter,
Synovus uses information provided by the fund managers in the determination of estimated fair
value. Valuation factors such as recent or proposed purchase or sale of debt or equity of
the issuer, pricing by other dealers in similar securities, size of position held, liquidity
of the market and changes in economic conditions affecting the issuer are used in the
determination of estimated fair value. These private equity investments are classified as
Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy.
Private equity investments may also include investments in publicly traded equity securities,
which have restrictions on their sale, generally obtained through an initial public offering.
Investments in the restricted publicly traded equity securities are recorded at fair value
based on the quoted market value less adjustments for regulatory or contractual sales
restrictions. Discounts for restrictions are determined based upon the length of the
restriction period and the volatility of the equity security. Investments in restricted
publicly traded equity securities are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
Derivative Assets and Liabilities
Equity derivatives are valued using quoted market prices and are classified as Level 1 within
the valuation hierarchy. All other derivatives are valued using internally developed models.
These derivatives include interest rate swaps, floors, caps, and collars. The sale of
To-be-announced (TBA) mortgage-backed securities for current month delivery or in the future
and the purchase of option contracts of similar duration are derivatives utilized by Synovus
mortgage subsidiary, and are valued by obtaining prices directly from dealers in the form of
quotes for identical securities or options using a bid pricing convention with a spread
between bid and offer quotations. All of these types of derivatives are classified as Level 2
within the valuation hierarchy. The mortgage subsidiary originates mortgage loans which are
classified as derivatives prior to the loan closing when there is a lock commitment
outstanding to a borrower to close a loan at a specific interest rate. These derivatives are
valued based on the other mortgage derivatives mentioned above except there is fall-out
ratios for interest rate lock commitments that have an additional input
12
which is considered Level 3. Therefore, this type of derivative instrument is classified as
Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. These amounts, however, are insignificant.
Certain Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposit
The fair value of certain callable brokered certificates of deposit is derived using several
inputs in a valuation model that calculates the discounted cash flows based upon a yield
curve. Once the yield curve is constructed, it is applied against the standard certificate
of deposit terms that may include the principal balance, payment frequency, term to maturity,
and interest accrual to arrive at the discounted cash flow based fair value. When valuing
the call option, as applicable, implied volatility is obtained for a similarly dated interest
rate swaption, and it is also entered in the model. These types of certificates of deposit
are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents all financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring
basis, including financial instruments for which Synovus has elected the fair value option as
of June 30, 2008 according to the SFAS No. 157 valuation hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/Liabilities at |
(in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Fair Value |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
|
19,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,204 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
5,730 |
|
|
|
3,673,742 |
|
|
|
134,912 |
(2) |
|
|
3,814,384 |
|
Private equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,049 |
|
|
|
65,049 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
6,914 |
|
|
|
102,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
90,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90,722 |
|
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,611 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
6,914 |
|
|
|
59,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,122 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts represent the value of the certain callable brokered certificates of deposit
for which Synovus has elected the fair value option under SFAS No. 159. |
|
(2) |
|
This amount primarily consists of Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank
stock of approximately $117.9 million and $4.4 million, respectively. |
Changes in Fair Value FVO Items
The following table presents the changes in fair value included in the consolidated statement of
income for items which the fair value election was made. The table does not reflect the change in
fair value attributable to the related economic hedges Synovus used to mitigate interest rate risk
associated with the financial instruments. These changes in fair value were recorded as a
component of mortgage banking income and other operating income, as appropriate, and substantially
offset the change in fair value of the financial instruments referenced below.
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
Other |
|
Changes in |
|
Mortgage |
|
Other |
|
Changes in |
|
|
Banking |
|
Operating |
|
Fair Value |
|
Banking |
|
Operating |
|
Fair Value |
(in thousands) |
|
Income |
|
Income |
|
Recorded |
|
Income |
|
Income |
|
Recorded |
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
$ |
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,370 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,320 |
) |
Certain callable brokered CDs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
$ |
(988 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(1,262 |
) |
|
$ |
1,262 |
|
Changes in Level Three Fair Value Measurements
As noted above, Synovus uses significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) to fair-value certain
assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2008. The table below includes a roll forward of the
balance sheet amount for the six months ended June 30, 2008 (including the change in fair
value), for financial instruments of a material nature that are classified by Synovus within
Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
Private Equity |
|
(in thousands) |
|
for Sale |
|
|
Investments |
|
Beginning balance January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
126,715 |
|
|
|
55,581 |
|
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized), net of minority interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,577 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net |
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
5,891 |
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
134,912 |
|
|
|
65,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total gains or (losses) for the period included in earnings
attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to
assets and liabilities still held at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
|
3,577 |
|
The table below summarizes gains and losses due to changes in fair value, including both
realized and unrealized gains and losses, recorded in earnings or changes in net assets for
material Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
Available for |
|
Private Equity |
|
Available for |
|
Private Equity |
(in thousands) |
|
Sale |
|
Investments |
|
Sale |
|
Investments |
Total change in
earnings, net of
minority interest |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
3,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
unrealized losses
to assets and
liabilities still
held at June 30,
2008 |
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
14
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis
Loans under the scope of SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan (SFAS No.
114), are evaluated for impairment using the present value of the expected future cash flows
discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or as a practical expedient, a loans observable
market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The
measurement of impaired loans using future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest
rate rather than the market rate of interest is not a fair value measurement and is therefore
excluded from the requirements of SFAS No. 157. Impaired loans measured by applying the practical
expedient in SFAS No. 114 are included in the requirements of SFAS No. 157.
Under the practical expedient, Synovus measures the fair value of collateral-dependent impaired
loans based on the fair value of the collateral securing these loans. These measurements are
classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. All impaired loans are secured by real
estate. The fair value of this real estate is generally determined based upon appraisals performed
by a certified or licensed appraiser using inputs such as absorption rates, capitalization rates,
and comparables. Management also considers other factors or recent developments which could result
in adjustments to the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisals such as changes in
absorption rates or market conditions from the time of valuation. Impaired loans are reviewed and
evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly, based
on the same factors identified above.
The fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans (including impaired loans held for
sale) totaled $485.7 million at June 30, 2008, compared to $433.6 million at March 31, 2008,
and $264.9 million at December 31, 2007.
Note 7 Derivative Instruments
Synovus accounts for its derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities on the
balance sheet at fair value through adjustments to either the hedged items, accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), or current earnings, as appropriate. As part of its overall interest
rate risk management activities, Synovus utilizes derivative instruments to manage its exposure to
various types of interest rate risk. These derivative instruments consist of interest rate swaps,
commitments to sell fixed-rate mortgage loans, and interest rate lock commitments made to
prospective mortgage loan customers. Interest rate lock commitments represent derivative
instruments since it is intended that such loans will be sold.
Synovus originates first lien residential mortgage loans for sale into the secondary market and
generally does not hold the originated loans for investment purposes. Mortgage loans are sold by
Synovus for conversion to securities and the servicing is sold to a third party servicing
aggregator, or the mortgage loans are sold as a whole loan to an investor either individually or in
bulk.
At June 30, 2008, Synovus had commitments to fund primarily fixed-rate mortgage loans to customers
in the amount of $72.0 million. The fair value of these commitments at June 30, 2008 resulted in an
unrealized gain of $1.1 million, which was recorded as a component of mortgage banking income in
the consolidated statements of income.
At June 30, 2008, outstanding commitments to sell primarily fixed-rate mortgage loans amounted to
approximately $231.0 million. Such commitments are entered into to reduce the exposure to market
risk arising from potential changes in interest rates, which could affect the
15
fair value of mortgage loans held for sale and outstanding commitments to originate residential
mortgage loans for resale.
The commitments to sell mortgage loans are at fixed prices and are scheduled to settle at specified
dates that generally do not exceed 90 days. The fair value of outstanding commitments to sell
mortgage loans at June 30, 2008 resulted in an unrealized gain of $877 thousand, which was recorded
as a component of mortgage banking income in the consolidated statements of income.
Synovus utilizes interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risks, primarily arising from its core
banking activities. These interest rate swap transactions generally involve the exchange of fixed
and floating rate interest rate payment obligations without the exchange of underlying principal
amounts. Entering into interest rate derivatives potentially exposes Synovus to the risk of
counterparties failure to fulfill their legal obligations including, but not limited to, potential
amounts due or payable under each derivative contract. Notional principal amounts are often used to
express the volume of these transactions, but the amounts potentially subject to credit risk are
much smaller.
The receive fixed interest rate swap contracts at June 30, 2008 are being utilized to hedge $850
million in floating rate loans and $1.38 billion in fixed-rate liabilities. A summary of interest
rate swap contracts and their terms at June 30, 2008 is shown below. In accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 133, the fair value (net unrealized gains and losses) of these contracts has
been recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Receive |
|
|
Pay |
|
|
In |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Gains |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate(*) |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
Receive fixed
interest swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges |
|
$ |
1,377,500 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
% |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
29 |
|
|
$ |
13,276 |
|
|
|
(1,414 |
) |
|
|
11,862 |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
850,000 |
|
|
|
7.86 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
31,440 |
|
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
30,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,227,500 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
% |
|
|
3.54 |
% |
|
|
30 |
|
|
$ |
44,716 |
|
|
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
|
42,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Variable pay rate based upon contract rates in effect at June 30, 2008. |
Synovus designates hedges of floating rate loans as cash flow hedges. These swaps hedge against the
variability of cash flows from specified pools of floating rate prime based loans. Synovus
calculates effectiveness of the hedging relationship quarterly using regression analysis for all
cash flow hedges entered into after March 31, 2007. The cumulative dollar offset method is used for
all hedges entered into prior to that date. As of June 30, 2008, cumulative ineffectiveness for
Synovus portfolio of cash flow hedges represented a gain of approximately $20 thousand.
Ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges is recognized in the consolidated statements of income as a
component of other operating income.
Synovus expects to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) approximately
$11.7 million as net-of-tax income during the next twelve months, as the related payments for
interest rate swaps and amortization of deferred gains (losses) are recorded.
Synovus designates hedges of fixed rate liabilities as fair value hedges. These swaps hedge against
the change in fair market value of various fixed rate liabilities due to changes in the benchmark
interest rate LIBOR. Synovus calculates effectiveness of the hedging relationships
16
quarterly using regression analysis for all fair value hedges entered into after March 31, 2007.
As of June 30, 2008, cumulative ineffectiveness for Synovus portfolio of fair value hedges
represented a gain of approximately $1.3 million. Ineffectiveness from fair value hedges is
recognized in the consolidated statements of income as other operating income.
Synovus also enters into derivative financial instruments to meet the financing and interest rate
risk management needs of its customers. Upon entering into these instruments to meet customer
needs, Synovus enters into offsetting positions in order to minimize the risk to Synovus. These
derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value with any resulting gain or loss
recorded in current period earnings. As of June 30, 2008, the notional amount of customer related
interest rate derivative financial instruments, including both the customer position and the
offsetting position, was $3.76 billion, an increase of $799.3 million compared to December 31,
2007.
Synovus also enters into derivative financial instruments to meet the equity risk management needs
of its customers. Upon entering into these instruments to meet customer needs, Synovus enters into
offsetting positions in order to minimize the risk to Synovus. These derivative financial
instruments are recorded at fair value with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period
earnings. As of June 30, 2008, the notional amount of customer related equity derivative financial
instruments, including both the customer position and the offsetting position, was $10.7 million,
unchanged from December 31, 2007.
Note 8 Share-Based Compensation
General Description of Share-Based Compensation Plans
Synovus has various long-term incentive plans under which the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors has the authority to grant share-based compensation to Synovus employees.
At June 30, 2008, Synovus had a total of 19,872,818 shares of its authorized but unissued common
stock reserved for future grants under the 2007 Omnibus Plan. The general terms of each of these
plans are substantially the same, permitting the grant of share-based compensation including stock
options, non-vested shares, restricted share units, and stock appreciation rights. These plans
generally include vesting periods ranging from three to five years and contractual terms ranging
from five to ten years. Stock options are granted at exercise prices which equal the fair market
value of a share of common stock on the grant date. Synovus historically issues new shares to
satisfy share option exercises.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
Synovus share-based compensation costs are recorded as a component of salaries and other personnel
expense in the consolidated statements of income. Share-based compensation expense is recognized
for plan participants on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the vesting period or the period
until reaching retirement eligibility. Share-based compensation expense from continuing operations
recognized in income is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Share-based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
Non-vested shares |
|
|
5,399 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
7,759 |
|
|
|
8,547 |
|
|
|
4,106 |
|
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Stock Option Awards
Synovus granted 3,090,911 and 48,000 options to purchase shares of Synovus common stock to certain
key Synovus employees during the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, at a weighted-average
exercise price of $13.17 and $12.50, respectively. At June 30, 2008, there were 31,601,244 options
to purchase shares of Synovus common stock outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of
$10.87.
Non-Vested Shares and Restricted Share Units
During the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus awarded 122,309 and 27,600,
respectively, restricted share units and 24,391 and 6,134, respectively, non-vested shares of
non-transferable Synovus common stock to certain key employees and non-employee directors of
Synovus. The weighted-average grant date fair value of both the awarded stock and the stock units
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $12.93.
All holders of non-vested shares of Synovus common stock on December 31, 2007 received Total System
Services, Inc. (TSYS) non-vested shares based on the distribution ratio applicable to all Synovus
shares in connection with the spin-off of TSYS. At June 30, 2008, there were 1,028,223 non-vested
Synovus shares and restricted share units outstanding and 426,087 non-vested shares of TSYS stock
outstanding with a combined weighted-average grant date fair value of $25.67.
In addition, 12,677 non-transferable non-vested shares of Synovus common stock and 6,135 non-vested
shares of TSYS common stock were awarded to a key Synovus executive from a 2005 authorized grant of
63,386 shares under a performance vesting schedule during the six-month period ended June 30, 2008,
with a grant date fair value of $23.42.
Note 9 Discontinued Operations
TSYS Spin-off
On December 31, 2007, Synovus completed the tax-free spin-off of its shares of TSYS common stock to
Synovus shareholders. The distribution of approximately 80.6% of TSYS outstanding shares owned by
Synovus was made to shareholders of record on December 18, 2007 (the record date). Each Synovus
shareholder received 0.483921 of a share of TSYS common stock for each share of Synovus common
stock held as of the record date. Synovus shareholders received cash in lieu of fractional shares
for amounts of less than one share of TSYS common stock. Pursuant to the agreement and plan of
distribution, TSYS paid on a pro rata basis to its shareholders, including Synovus, a one-time cash
dividend of $600 million or $3.0309 per TSYS share based on the number of TSYS shares outstanding
as of the record date. Based on the number of TSYS shares owned by Synovus as of the record date,
Synovus received $483.8 million in proceeds from this one-time cash dividend. The dividend was
paid on December 31, 2007.
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, and SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, the historical consolidated results of operations of TSYS, as well as all costs
associated with the spin-off of TSYS are now presented as a component of income from discontinued
operations. The balance sheet for the periods ended June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 does not
include assets and liabilities of TSYS.
18
Transfer of Mutual Funds
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, Synovus transferred its proprietary mutual funds
(Synovus Funds) to a non-affiliated third party. As a result of the transfer, Synovus received
gross proceeds of $7.96 million and incurred transaction related costs of $1.07 million, resulting
in a pre-tax gain of $6.89 million or $4.20 million, after-tax. The net gain has been reported as
discontinued operations on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Financial results
of the business associated with the Synovus Funds for 2007 have not been presented as discontinued
operations as such amounts are inconsequential. This business did not have significant assets,
liabilities, revenues, or expenses associated with it.
The following amounts have been segregated from continuing operations and included in income from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest, in the consolidated statements
of income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
TSYS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSYS revenues |
|
$ |
903,155 |
|
|
$ |
466,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSYS income, net of minority interest and before taxes |
|
|
169,946 |
|
|
|
88,707 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(70,496 |
) |
|
|
(35,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations related to TSYS, net of
income taxes |
|
|
99,450 |
|
|
|
53,104 |
|
Spin-off related expenses incurred by Synovus, net of income
tax benefit |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
Gain on sale
of mutual funds, net of income taxes |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and
minority interest |
|
$ |
103,287 |
|
|
$ |
56,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows of discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
119,506 |
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(43,720 |
) |
Cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(13,556 |
) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by discontinued operations |
|
$ |
63,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Under SFAS No. 142 (SFAS No. 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is required to
be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that
there may be impairment. The combination of the income approach utilizing the
19
discounted cash flow (DCF) method, the public company comparables approach, utilizing multiples of
tangible book value, and the transaction approach, utilizing readily available market valuation
multiples for closed transactions, is used to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit.
Impairment is tested at the reporting unit (sub-segment) level involving two steps. Step 1
compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value is greater
than carrying value, there is no indication of impairment. Step 2 is performed when the fair value
determined in Step 1 is less than the carrying value. Step 2 involves a process similar to
business combination accounting where fair values are assigned to all assets, liabilities, and
intangibles. The result of Step 2 is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the Step 2 implied
value of goodwill is less than the recorded goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the
difference. The total of all reporting unit fair values is compared for reasonableness to Synovus
market capitalization plus a control premium.
Goodwill at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $492.1 million and $519.1 million,
respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus conducted its annual goodwill
impairment evaluation. As a result of this evaluation, Synovus recognized a goodwill impairment
charge of $27.0 million (pre-tax and after-tax) on one of its reporting units. The charge has been
recorded as a component of non-interest expense. The goodwill impairment charge was primarily
related to a decrease in valuation based on market trading and transaction multiples.
The goodwill impairment charge is preliminary and is subject to the finalization of the Step 2
calculation; however, based on preliminary Step 2 results, Synovus does not expect a significant change in the impairment charge.
Intangible assets (excluding goodwill) net of accumulated amortization as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively, are presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Other intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased trust revenues |
|
$ |
2,222 |
|
|
|
2,362 |
|
Acquired customer contracts |
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
Core deposit premiums |
|
|
19,998 |
|
|
|
22,668 |
|
Other |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying value |
|
$ |
24,860 |
|
|
|
28,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 Income Taxes
Synovus files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions,
and is subject to examinations by these taxing authorities unless statutory examination periods
lapse. Synovus U.S. Federal income tax return is filed on a consolidated basis. Most state
income tax returns are filed on a separate entity basis. Synovus is no longer subject to U.S.
Federal income tax examinations for years before 2004 and Synovus is no longer subject to income
tax examinations from state and local tax authorities for years before 2001. There is currently no
Federal tax examination in progress. However, certain state tax examinations are in progress by
the relevant state tax authorities. Although Synovus is unable to determine the ultimate outcome
of these examinations, Synovus believes that its liability for uncertain tax positions relating to
these jurisdictions for such years is adequate.
In connection with the spin-off of TSYS, Synovus entered into a tax sharing agreement with TSYS,
which requires TSYS to indemnify Synovus from potential income tax liabilities that may
20
arise in future examinations as a result of TSYS inclusion in Synovus consolidated tax return
filings for calendar years prior to 2008.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows
(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
7,074 |
|
|
$ |
8,207 |
|
Current activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to current year |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net, current activity |
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
8,529 |
|
|
$ |
8,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unrecognized state tax benefits are not adjusted for the Federal tax impact. |
Synovus recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits as a
component of income tax expense. Accrued interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits
totaled $1.1 million and $1.2 million as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively. The
total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008 that, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $5.4 million and $6.4 million (net of the
Federal benefit on state tax issues), respectively, which includes interest and penalties of $745
thousand and $780 thousand.
Synovus is not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or
decrease over time; however, at this time, Synovus does not expect a significant payment related to
these obligations within the next year. Synovus expects that approximately $450 thousand of
uncertain tax positions will be either settled or resolved during the next twelve months.
Note 12 Visa Initial Public Offering and Litigation Expense
Synovus is a member of the Visa USA network. Under Visa USA bylaws, Visa members are obligated to
indemnify Visa USA and/or its parent company, Visa, Inc., for potential future settlement of, or
judgments resulting from, certain litigation, which Visa refers to as the covered litigation.
Synovus indemnification obligation is limited to its membership proportion of Visa USA. On
November 7, 2007, Visa announced the settlement of its American Express litigation, and disclosed
in its annual report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form 10-K for the year
ended September 30, 2007 that Visa had accrued a contingent liability for the estimated settlement
of its Discover litigation. During the second half of 2007, Synovus recognized a contingent
liability in the amount of $36.8 million as an estimate for its membership proportion of the
American Express settlement and the potential Discover settlement, as well as its membership
proportion of the amount that Synovus estimates will be required for Visa to settle the remaining
covered litigation.
Visa, Inc. completed an initial public offering (the Visa IPO) in March 2008. Visa used a portion
of the proceeds from the IPO to establish a $3.0 billion escrow for settlement of covered
21
litigation and used substantially all of the remaining portion to redeem class B and class C shares
held by Visa issuing members. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, Synovus recognized a
pre-tax gain of $38.5 million on redemption proceeds received from Visa, Inc. and reduced the $36.8
million litigation accrual recognized in the second half of 2007 by $17.4 million for its pro-rata
share of the $3.0 billion escrow funded by Visa, Inc. The redemption of shares and reduction of the
accrued liability following the Visa IPO resulted in a gain of $34.1 million, net of tax, or $0.10
per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Note 13 Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASBs Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on EITF Issue
No. 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements (EITF 06-4). EITF 06-4 requires an employer to recognize
a liability for future benefits based on the substantive agreement with the employee. EITF 06-4
requires a company to use the guidance prescribed in SFAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 12,
Omnibus Opinion, when entering into an endorsement split-dollar life insurance agreement and
recognizing the liability. EITF 06-4 was effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15,
2007. Synovus adopted the provisions of EITF 06-4 effective January 1, 2008 and recognized
approximately $2.4 million as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings.
In November 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-10, Accounting for Deferred
Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life
Insurance Arrangements (EITF 06-10). Under EITF 06-10, an employer should recognize a liability
for the postretirement benefit related to a collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance
arrangement. The recognition of an asset should be based on the nature and substance of the
collateral, as well as the terms of the arrangement such as (1) future cash flows to which the
employer is entitled and (2) employees obligation (and ability) to repay the employer. EITF 06-10
was effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2007. Synovus adopted the provisions
of EITF 06-10 effective January 1, 2008. There was no impact to Synovus upon adoption of EITF
06-10.
In November 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax
Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards (EITF 06-11). Employees may receive dividend
payments (or the equivalent of) on vested and non-vested share-based payment awards. Under EITF
06-11, the Task Force concluded that a realized income tax benefit from dividends (or dividend
equivalents) that are charged to retained earnings and are paid to employees for equity classified
nonvested equity shares, nonvested equity share units, and outstanding equity share options should
be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital. Once the award is settled, the Company
should determine whether the cumulative tax deduction exceeded the cumulative compensation cost
recognized on the income statement. If the total tax benefit exceeds the tax effect of the
cumulative compensation cost, the excess would be an increase to additional paid-in capital. EITF
06-11 was effective for fiscal periods beginning after September 15, 2007. The impact of adoption
of EITF 06-11 was not material to Synovus financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 109, Written Loan Commitments
Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings, (SAB 109). SAB 109 supercedes SAB 105, Application of
Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. SAB 109, consistent with SFAS No. 156, Accounting for
Servicing of Financial Assets, and SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, requires that the expected net
22
future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the
measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings.
A separate and distinct servicing asset or liability is not recognized for accounting purposes
until the servicing rights have been contractually separated from the underlying loan by sale or
securitization of the loan with servicing retained. The provisions of this bulletin were effective
for derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15,
2007. The impact of adoption of SAB 109 was an increase in mortgage revenues of approximately $1.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
In December 2007, the SEC issued SAB No. 110, Share-Based Payment, (SAB 110) SAB 110 allows
eligible public companies to continue to use a simplified method for estimating the expected term
of stock options if their own historical exercise data no longer provides a reasonable basis.
Under SAB No. 107, Share-Based Payment, the simplified method was scheduled to expire for all
grants made after December 31, 2007. The provisions of this bulletin were effective on January 1,
2008. Due to the spin-off of TSYS on December 31, 2007 and recent changes to the terms of stock
option agreements, Synovus elected to continue using the simplified method for determining the
expected term component for all share options granted during 2008.
23
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made or incorporated by reference in this document which are not statements of
historical fact, including those under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, and elsewhere in this document, constitute forward-looking statements
within the meaning of, and subject to the protections of, Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to Synovus
beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, targets, expectations, anticipations, assumptions, estimates,
intentions and future performance and involve known and unknown risks, many of which are beyond
Synovus control and which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Synovus or
the commercial banking industry or economy generally, to be materially different from future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. You can
identify these forward-looking statements through Synovus use of words such as believes,
anticipates, expects, may,
will, assumes, should,
predicts, could,
should, would, intends,
targets, estimates, projects, plans, potential and other
similar words and expressions of the future or otherwise regarding the outlook for Synovus future
business and financial performance and/or the performance of the commercial banking industry and
economy generally. Forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of
Synovus management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may
differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. A number of factors
could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking
statements in this document. Many of these factors are beyond Synovus ability to control or
predict. These factors include, but are not limited to: (1) competitive pressures arising from
aggressive competition from other financial service providers; (2) deteriorating credit quality,
particularly in residential construction and development loans, may result in increased
delinquencies and credit losses, which will adversely impact us; (3) declining values of
residential and commercial real estate may increase our credit losses and negatively affect our
financial results; (4) the concentration of our nonperforming assets in certain geographic regions
and with affiliated borrower groups; (5) inadequacy of our allowance for loan loss reserve, or the
risk that the allowance may prove to be inadequate or may be negatively affected by credit risk
exposures; (6) changes in the interest rate environment which expand or reduce interest margins,
impact funding sources or adversely affect critical estimates, as applied, and fair value of
assets; (7) slower than anticipated rates of growth in non-interest income; (8) changes in the cost
and availability of funding due to changes in the deposit market and credit market, or the way in
which Synovus is perceived in such markets, including a reduction in our debt ratings;
(9) inability to access the capital markets on terms that are satisfactory; (10) the strength of
the U.S. economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which operations are
conducted may be different than expected; (11) the effects of and changes in trade, monetary and
fiscal policies, and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board;
(12) inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; (13) restrictions or limitations
on access to funds from subsidiaries, thereby restricting our ability to make payments on our
obligations or dividend payments; (14) the effect of changes in governmental policy, laws and
regulations, including proposed and recently enacted changes in
24
the regulation of banks and financial institutions, or the interpretation or application thereof,
including restrictions, limitations and/or penalties arising from banking, securities and insurance
laws, regulations and examinations; (15) the costs and effects of litigation, investigations or
similar matters, or adverse facts and developments related thereto,
including, without limitation, the pending litigation with
CompuCredit Corporation relating to CB&Ts Affinity Agreement with CompuCredit; (16) Synovus indemnification
obligation in connection with the Visa covered litigation may be greater than expected; (17) the
volatility of our stock price; and (18) other factors and other information contained in this
document and in other reports and filings that Synovus makes with the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Exchange Act.
All written or oral forward-looking statements that are made by or are attributable to Synovus are
expressly qualified by this cautionary notice. You should not place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements, since those statements speak only as of the date on which the
statements are made. Synovus undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to
reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made to reflect the
occurrence of new information or unanticipated events, except as may otherwise be required by law.
25
Executive Summary
The following financial review provides a discussion of Synovus financial condition, changes in
financial condition, and results of operations.
Industry Overview
The first half of 2008 has been marked by challenging financial and credit markets, building on
issues that began in the sub-prime mortgage market in the second half of 2007 and which led to
declines in real estate and home values. Consumer confidence declined as rising costs fueled by
unprecedented prices for crude oil have paralleled the downturns in housing and mortgage related
financial services. The supply of housing has surged as new and existing home sales declined
sharply and foreclosures reached record levels.
The Federal Reserve Bank (Federal Reserve) responded, lowering the federal funds rate by 200
basis points in the first quarter and another 25 basis points in the second quarter. Despite
these rate cuts and other measures taken by the Federal Reserve to provide additional liquidity
in financial markets, consumer confidence has remained weak.
The economic environment for the financial services industry as a whole has been affected in a
variety of ways, as evidenced by heightened levels of credit losses, declining value of real
property as collateral for loans, record levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and
foreclosures. While these factors have negatively influenced earning asset yields, the average
cost of funds has risen in an intensely competitive market for deposits. As a result, financial
institutions have experienced pressure on credit costs, loan yields, deposit and other borrowing
costs, and capital.
About Our Business
Synovus is a financial services holding company, based in Columbus, Georgia, with approximately
$34 billion in assets. Synovus provides integrated financial services including banking,
financial management, insurance, mortgage, and leasing services through 35 wholly-owned
subsidiary banks and other Synovus offices in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee, and
Florida. At June 30, 2008, our banks ranged in size from $113.1 million to $5.76 billion in
total assets.
Our Key Financial Performance Indicators
In terms of how we measure success in our business, the following are our key financial
performance indicators:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Growth
|
|
Credit Quality
|
|
Capital Strength |
|
|
Core Deposit Growth
|
|
Fee Income Growth |
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Margin
|
|
Expense Management |
|
|
Financial Performance Summary
|
|
|
Net income: $12.1 million, down 88.6%, and $93.1 million, down
54.9%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively,
as compared to income from continuing operations for the prior year
periods. |
26
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment: $27.0 million, or $0.08 per diluted share,
for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008. Goodwill impairment
is a non-cash charge and has no impact on Synovus tangible capital
levels, regulatory capital ratios or on liquidity since goodwill is
already excluded from these measures. |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (EPS): $0.04 for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and $0.28 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, down
88.6% and 55.1%, respectively, from EPS from continuing operations for
the same periods a year ago (EPS of $0.12 for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, excluding the goodwill impairment charge of $27.0
million). |
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin: 3.57% and 3.64% for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, respectively, as compared to 4.00% and 4.03%,
respectively, for the same periods in 2007 (on a sequential quarter
basis, 3 basis points of the 14 basis point decrease in the margin are
related to increased credit costs). |
|
|
|
|
Loan growth: 7.5% increase from June 30, 2007, 7.2% annualized
increase from December 31, 2007, and 4.9% annualized sequential quarter
growth. |
|
|
|
|
Credit quality: |
|
|
|
Non-performing assets ratio of 3.00%, compared to 2.49% at
March 31, 2008 and 1.67% at December 31, 2007 (29 basis points
of the sequential quarter increase was from the Atlanta
market). |
|
|
|
|
Provision expense of $93.6 million and $184.7 million for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, as
compared to $20.3 million and $40.8 million for the same
periods in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Past dues over 90 days and still accruing interest as a
percentage of total loans of 0.14%, compared to 0.16% at March
31, 2008 and 0.13% at December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Total past dues over 30 days and still accruing interest as
a percentage of total loans of 1.33% compared to 1.39% at March
31, 2008 and 1.02% at December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off ratio of 1.04% and 0.99% for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to 0.25%
and 0.19% for the same periods in the prior year. |
|
|
|
|
Core deposits (total deposits less brokered deposits): 0.7%
decline compared to June 30, 2007, and 4.1% annualized
sequential quarter growth. |
|
|
|
Non-interest income: up 11.8% for the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 34.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
corresponding periods in the prior year (up 13.8% for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 excluding the gain from redemption of Visa shares). |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense: up 34.6% for the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 19.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
corresponding periods in the prior year (up 20.9% and 16.6% for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, excluding the
reduction in the Visa litigation accrual and goodwill impairment
charge). |
27
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: $3.43 billion at June 30, 2008, or 10.02% of
assets. The Tier I Capital Ratio was 8.91%, the Total Risk-Based
Capital Ratio was 12.28%, and the Tangible Common Equity to Tangible
Assets Ratio was 8.64%. |
|
|
|
|
Visa, Inc. completed an initial public offering (the Visa IPO) in
March 2008. Visa used a portion of the proceeds from the Visa IPO to
establish a $3.0 billion escrow for settlement of covered litigation
and used substantially all of the remaining portion to redeem class B
and class C shares held by Visa issuing members. During the three
months ended March 31, 2008, Synovus recognized a pre-tax gain of $38.5
million on redemption proceeds received from Visa, Inc. and reduced the
$36.8 million litigation accrual recognized in the second half of 2007
by $17.4 million for its pro-rata share of the $3.0 billion escrow
funded by Visa. Inc. The redemption proceeds and reduction of the Visa
litigation accrual resulted in a gain of $34.1 million, net of tax, or
$0.10 per diluted share. Synovus currently holds 1.4 million Visa
class B shares which are subject to certain restrictions on sale and
have a carrying value of zero. |
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting and financial reporting policies of Synovus conform to U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and to general practices within the banking industry. Synovus has
identified certain of its accounting policies as critical accounting policies. In determining
which accounting policies are critical in nature, Synovus has identified the policies that require
significant judgment or involve complex estimates. The application of these policies has a
significant impact on Synovus financial statements. Synovus financial results could differ
significantly if different judgments or estimates are applied in the application of these policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Notes 1 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Synovus 2007 annual report contain a
discussion of the allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2008 was
$417.8 million.
The allowance for loan losses is determined based on an analysis which assesses the probable loss
within the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses consists of two components: the allocated
and unallocated allowances. Both components of the allowance are available to cover inherent losses
in the portfolio. Significant judgments or estimates made in the determination of the allowance for
loan losses consist of the risk ratings for loans in the commercial loan portfolio, the valuation
of the collateral for loans that are classified as collateral-dependent impaired loans, and the
loss factors.
Commercial Loans Risk Ratings and Expected Loss Factors
Commercial loans are assigned a risk rating on a nine point scale. For commercial loans that are
not considered impaired, the allocated allowance for loan losses is determined based upon the
expected loss percentage factors that correspond to each risk rating.
The risk ratings are based on the borrowers credit risk profile, considering factors such as debt
service history and capacity, inherent risk in the credit (e.g., based on industry type and source
of
28
repayment), and collateral position. Ratings 6 through 9 are modeled after the bank regulatory
classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss. Expected loss percentage
factors are based on the probable loss including qualitative factors. The probable loss considers
the probability of default, the loss given default, and certain qualitative factors as determined
by loan category and risk rating. The probability of default and loss given default are based on
industry data. Industry data will continue to be used until sufficient internal data becomes
available. The qualitative factors consider credit concentrations, recent levels and trends in
delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, and growth in the loan portfolio. The occurrence of certain
events could result in changes to the expected loss factors. Accordingly, these expected loss
factors are reviewed periodically and modified as necessary.
Each loan is assigned a risk rating during the approval process. This process begins with a rating
recommendation from the loan officer responsible for originating the loan. The rating
recommendation is subject to approvals from other members of management and/or loan committees
depending on the size and type of credit. Ratings are re-evaluated on a quarterly basis.
Additionally, an independent holding company credit review function evaluates each banks risk
rating process at least every twelve to eighteen months.
Impaired Loans
Management considers a loan to be impaired when the ultimate collectibility of all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement are in doubt. A majority of our impaired
loans are collateral-dependent. The net carrying amount of collateral-dependent impaired loans is
equal to the lower of the loans principal balance or the fair value of the collateral (less
estimated costs to sell) not only at the date at which impairment is initially recognized, but also
at each subsequent reporting period. Accordingly, our policy requires that we update the fair
value of the collateral securing collateral-dependent impaired loans each calendar quarter.
Impaired loans, not including impaired loans held for sale, had a net carrying value of $479.3
million at June 30, 2008. Most of these loans are secured by real estate, with the majority
classified as collateral-dependent loans. The fair value of the real estate securing these loans is
generally determined based upon appraisals performed by a certified or licensed appraiser.
Management also considers other factors or recent developments which could result in adjustments to
the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisals.
Estimated losses on collateral-dependent impaired loans are typically charged-off. At June 30,
2008, $424.5 million, or 67.8%, of non-performing loans consisted of collateral-dependent impaired
loans for which there is no allowance for loan losses as the estimated losses have been
charged-off. These loans are recorded at the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral net
of selling costs. However, if a collateral-dependent loan is placed on impaired status at or near
the end of a calendar quarter, management records an allowance for loan losses based on the loans
risk rating while an appraisal is being obtained. At June 30, 2008, Synovus had $54.8 million in
collateral-dependent impaired loans with a recorded allocated allowance for loan losses of $10.4
million, or 19.0% of the principal balance. The estimated losses on these loans will be recorded
as a charge-off during the third quarter of 2008 after the receipt of a current appraisal or fair
value estimate based on current market conditions, including absorption rates. Management does not
expect a material difference between the current allocated allowance on these loans and the actual
charge-off.
29
Retail Loans Expected Loss Factors
The allocated allowance for loan losses for retail loans is generally determined by segregating the
retail loan portfolio into pools of homogeneous loan categories. Expected loss factors applied to
these pools are based on the probable loss including qualitative factors. The probable loss
considers the probability of default, the loss given default, and certain qualitative factors as
determined by loan category and risk rating. Through December 31, 2007, the probability of default
loss factors were based on industry data. Beginning January 1, 2008, the probability of default
loss factors are based on internal default experience because this was the first reporting period
when sufficient internal default data became available. Synovus believes that this data provides a
more accurate estimate of probability of default considering the lower inherent risk of the retail
portfolio and lower than expected charge-offs. This change resulted in a reduction in the allocated
allowance for loan losses for the retail portfolio of approximately $19 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2008. The loss given default factors continue to be based on industry data
because sufficient internal data is not yet available. The qualitative factors consider credit
concentrations, recent levels and trends in delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, and growth in the
loan portfolio. The occurrence of certain events could result in changes to the loss factors.
Accordingly, these loss factors are reviewed periodically and modified as necessary.
Unallocated Component
The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses is considered necessary to provide for
certain environmental and economic factors that effect the probable loss inherent in the entire
loan portfolio. Unallocated loss factors included in the determination of the unallocated allowance
are economic factors, changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and
staff, and changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards. Certain
macro- economic factors and changes in business conditions and developments could have a material
impact on the collectibility of the overall portfolio. As an example, a rapidly rising interest
rate environment could have a material impact on certain borrowers ability to pay. The unallocated
component is meant to cover such risks.
Income Taxes
Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements in Synovus 2007 Annual Report contains a
discussion of income taxes. The calculation of Synovus income tax provision is complex and
requires the use of estimates and judgments in its determination. As part of Synovus overall
business strategy, management must consider tax laws and regulations that apply to the specific
facts and circumstances under consideration. This analysis includes the amount and timing of the
realization of income tax liabilities or benefits. Management closely monitors tax developments on
both the state and federal level in order to evaluate the effect they may have on Synovus overall
tax position. At June 30, 2008, Synovus concluded that it did not need a valuation allowance for
its deferred income tax assets and had a net accrual of $6.4 million for unrecognized tax benefits.
Asset Impairment
Goodwill
Under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, (SFAS No. 142) goodwill is required to
be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that
there may be impairment. The combination of the income approach utilizing the
30
discounted cash flow (DCF) method, the public company comparables approach, utilizing multiples of
tangible book value, and the transaction approach, utilizing readily available market valuation
multiples for closed transactions, is used to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit.
Impairment is tested at the reporting unit (sub-segment) level involving two steps. Step 1
compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value is greater
than carrying value, there is no indication of impairment. Step 2 is performed when the fair value
determined in Step 1 is less than the carrying value. Step 2 involves a process similar to
business combination accounting where fair values are assigned to all assets, liabilities, and
intangibles. The result of Step 2 is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the Step 2 implied
value of goodwill is less than the recorded goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the
difference. The total of all reporting unit fair values is compared for reasonableness to Synovus
market capitalization plus a control premium.
Goodwill at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $492.1 million and $519.1 million,
respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus conducted its annual goodwill
impairment evaluation. As a result of this evaluation, Synovus recognized a non-cash charge for
impairment of goodwill of $27.0 million (pre-tax and after-tax) on one of its reporting units. The
change has been recorded as a component of non-interest expense. The goodwill impairment charge was
primarily related to a decrease in valuation based on market trading and transaction multiples.
The goodwill impairment charge is preliminary and is subject to the finalization of the Step 2
calculation; however, based on preliminary Step 2 results, Synovus does not expect a significant change in the impairment charge.
An extended period of future significant deterioration in credit and financial markets could result
in additional impairment of Synovus goodwill.
Long-Lived Assets and Other Intangibles
Synovus reviews long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and other intangibles subject to
amortization, including core deposit premiums and customer relationships, for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by
the asset. If the actual cash flows are not consistent with Synovus estimates, an impairment
charge may result.
Discontinued Operations
Refer to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited) as of and for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 for a discussion of discontinued operations.
Balance Sheet
During the first six months of 2008, total assets increased $1.21 billion. The more significant
increases consisted of loans, net of unearned income, up $947.3 million and investment securities
available for sale up $147.4 million.
The balance sheet growth during the first six months of 2008 was funded through an increase in
brokered deposits of $834.8 million, core deposits of $233.8 million, and Federal Home Loan Bank
advances (a component of long-term debt) of $232.3 million.
31
Adoption of SFAS Nos. 157 and 159
SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP,
clarifies the definition of fair value within that framework, and expands disclosures about the use
of fair value measurements. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to make an irrevocable election, at
specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. Fair value is used on a recurring basis for certain assets and liabilities in which fair
value is the primary basis of accounting. Fair value is used on a non-recurring basis for
collateral-dependent impaired loans. Examples of recurring use of fair value include trading
account assets, mortgage loans held for sale, investment securities available for sale, private
equity investments, derivative instruments, and trading account liabilities. The extent to which
fair value is used on a recurring basis was expanded upon the adoption of SFAS No. 159 during the
first quarter, effective on January 1, 2008. At June 30, 2008, approximately $4.67 billion, or
13.7%, of total assets were recorded at fair value, which includes items measured on a recurring
and non-recurring basis.
Fair value is the price that could be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value determination in accordance with
SFAS No. 157 requires that a number of significant judgments be made. The standard also
establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of
inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Synovus has an
established and well-documented process for determining fair values and fair value hierarchy
classifications. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available (Level 1). Where
prices for identical assets and liabilities are not available, SFAS No. 157 requires that similar
assets and liabilities are identified (Level 2). If observable market prices are unavailable or
impracticable to obtain, or similar assets cannot be identified, then fair value is estimated using
internally-developed valuation modeling techniques such as discounted cash flow analyses that
primarily use as inputs market-based or independently sourced market parameters (Level 3). These
modeling techniques incorporate assessments regarding assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing the asset or the liability. The assessments with respect to assumptions that market
participants would make are inherently difficult to determine and use of different assumptions
could result in material changes to these fair value measurements.
The following table summarizes the assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis by level
within the valuation hierarchy at June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
account |
|
|
|
loans held |
|
|
|
available for |
|
|
|
Private equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
|
assets |
|
|
|
for sale |
|
|
|
sale |
|
|
|
investments |
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Level 2 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held at
fair value on the
balance sheet |
|
|
$ |
20.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
185.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,814.4 |
|
|
|
$ |
65.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
109.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,194.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 assets as a
percentage of total
assets measured at
fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.77 |
% |
32
The following table summarizes the liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis by
level within the valuation hierarchy at June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Brokered |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
certificates of |
|
|
|
Trading account |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
|
deposit |
|
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Level 2 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
held at fair value
on the balance sheet |
|
|
$ |
90.7 |
|
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
|
$ |
66.1 |
|
|
|
$ |
167.4 |
|
|
Level 3 liabilities
as a percentage of
total liabilities
measured at fair
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
In estimating the fair values for investment securities and most derivative financial instruments,
independent, third-party market prices are the best evidence of exit price and, where available,
Synovus bases estimates on such prices. If such third-party market prices are not available on the
exact securities that Synovus owns, fair values are based on the market prices of similar
instruments, third-party broker quotes, or are estimated using industry-standard or proprietary
models whose inputs may be unobservable. When market observable data is not available, the
valuation of financial instruments becomes more subjective and involves substantial judgment. The
need to use unobservable inputs generally results from the lack of market liquidity for certain
types of loans and securities, which results in diminished observability of both actual trades and
assumptions that would otherwise be available to value these instruments. When fair values are
estimated based on internal models, relevant market indices that correlate to the underlying
collateral are considered, along with assumptions such as interest rates, prepayment speeds,
default rates, and discount rates.
The valuation for mortgage loans held for sale (MLHFS) is based upon forward settlement of a pool
of loans of identical coupon, maturity, product, and credit attributes. The model is continuously
updated with available market and historical data. The valuation methodology of nonpublic private
equity investments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market
prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of such assets. Private equity
investments are valued initially based upon transaction price. Thereafter, Synovus uses
information provided by the fund managers in the initial determination of estimated fair value.
Valuation factors such as recent or proposed purchase or sale of debt or equity of the issuer,
pricing by other dealers in similar securities, size of position held, liquidity of the market and
changes in economic conditions affecting the issuer are used in the final determination of
estimated fair value.
Valuation methodologies are reviewed each quarter to ensure that fair value estimates are
appropriate. Any changes to the valuation methodologies are reviewed by management to confirm the
changes are justified. As markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products
becomes more or less transparent, Synovus continues to refine its valuation methodologies. For a
detailed discussion of valuation methodologies, refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial
statements (unaudited) as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
33
Trading Account Assets
The trading account assets portfolio, which had a balance of $20.2 million at June 30, 2008, is
substantially comprised of mortgage-backed securities which are bought and held principally for
sale and delivery to correspondent and retail customers of Synovus. Trading account assets are
reported on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses
included in other operating income on the consolidated statements of income. Synovus recognized a
net loss on trading account assets of $239 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and a
net gain of $519 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to a net gain of $563
thousand and $801 thousand, respectively, for the same periods in the prior year.
Impaired Loans Held for Sale
Loans or pools of loans are transferred to the impaired loans held for sale portfolio when the
intent to hold the loans has changed due to portfolio management or risk mitigation strategies and
when there is a plan to sell the loans within a reasonable period of time. The value of the loans
or pools of loans is primarily determined by analyzing the underlying collateral of the loan and
the external market prices of similar assets. At the time of transfer, if the fair value is less
than the cost, the difference attributable to declines in credit quality is recorded as a
charge-off against the allowance for loan losses. Decreases in fair value subsequent to the
transfer as well as losses from sale of these loans are recognized as a component of non-interest
expense. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, Synovus transferred loans totaling $63.3
million to the impaired loans held for sale portfolio. At the time of the transfer, Synovus
recognized a $21.0 million charge-off on these loans, which resulted in a new cost basis of $42.3
million at March 31, 2008. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus recognized a loss
of $4.7 million from the sale of impaired loans held for sale and recognized additional write-downs
of $5.4 million on the loans remaining in the portfolio. The $5.4 million write-down was based
upon the estimated sales proceeds from a pending liquidation sale.
Other Real Estate
Other real estate, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of
loans, is reported at the lower of cost or fair value, determined on the basis of current
appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent
sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan
balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against
the allowance for loan losses. Gains or losses on sale and any subsequent adjustments to the value
are recorded as a component of non-interest expense.
The carrying value of other real estate was $197.3 million and $101.5 million at June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2008,
approximately $169.8 million of loans and $1.5 million of impaired loans held for sale were
foreclosed and transferred to other real estate. The increased in other real estate is the result
of negative migration in credit quality, the declining value of real estate in certain parts of
Florida and the excess supply of residential real estate in the Atlanta area. During the six and
three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus recognized other real
estate costs of $21.4 million and
$13.5 million, respectively. These costs primarily relate to losses from the liquidation of other
real estate through bulk sales and auctions as well as further write-downs due to declines in fair
value subsequent to the date of foreclosure and, to a lesser degree,
carrying costs associated with other real estate.
34
Loans
The following table compares the composition of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2008, December 31,
2007, and June 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
Loan Type |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% change(1) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% change |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
$ |
527,881 |
|
|
$ |
452,163 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
$ |
489,453 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Hotels |
|
|
|
756,492 |
|
|
|
614,979 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
581,376 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
Office buildings |
|
|
|
966,171 |
|
|
|
953,093 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
856,999 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
Shopping centers |
|
|
|
965,130 |
|
|
|
834,025 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
712,210 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
Commercial development |
|
|
|
909,965 |
|
|
|
961,271 |
|
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
919,965 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Other investment property |
|
|
|
873,902 |
|
|
|
714,296 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
687,683 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Properties |
|
|
|
4,999,541 |
|
|
|
4,529,827 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
4,247,686 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family construction |
|
|
|
1,971,819 |
|
|
|
2,238,925 |
|
|
|
(24.0 |
) |
|
|
2,382,147 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
1-4 family perm /mini-perm |
|
|
|
1,350,463 |
|
|
|
1,273,843 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
1,167,658 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
Residential development |
|
|
|
2,227,709 |
|
|
|
2,311,459 |
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
2,297,807 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 1-4 Family Properties |
|
|
|
5,549,991 |
|
|
|
5,824,227 |
|
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
5,847,612 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Acquisition |
|
|
|
1,569,618 |
|
|
|
1,545,933 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1,430,431 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial
Real Estate (2) |
|
|
|
12,119,150 |
|
|
|
11,899,987 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
11,525,729 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural |
|
|
|
6,788,276 |
|
|
|
6,420,689 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
6,240,987 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Owner-occupied |
|
|
|
4,367,743 |
|
|
|
4,226,707 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
4,095,800 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and
Industrial |
|
|
|
11,156,019 |
|
|
|
10,647,396 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
10,336,787 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
1,632,551 |
|
|
|
1,543,701 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
1,417,681 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
Consumer mortgages |
|
|
|
1,723,689 |
|
|
|
1,667,924 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
1,544,932 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
|
299,850 |
|
|
|
291,149 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
280,805 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Other retail loans |
|
|
|
555,507 |
|
|
|
494,591 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
483,820 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Retail |
|
|
|
4,211,597 |
|
|
|
3,997,365 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
3,727,238 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned Income |
|
|
|
(40,875 |
) |
|
|
(46,163 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(48,012 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
27,445,891 |
|
|
$ |
26,498,585 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
$ |
25,541,742 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Percentage changes are annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
Commercial real estate represents 44.2%, 44.9% and 45.1% of total loans at June 30,
2008, December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007, respectively. |
35
At June 30, 2008, loans outstanding were $27.45 billion, an increase of $1.90 billion, or 7.5%,
compared to June 30, 2007. On a sequential quarter basis, total loans outstanding grew by
$328.4 million or 4.9% annualized.
At
June 30, 2008, Synovus had 48 loan relationships with total commitments of $50 million or more
(including amounts funded). The average funded balance of these
relationships at June 30, 2008 was
approximately $53 million.
Total loans as of June 30, 2008 for the five southeastern state areas in which Synovus banks are
located are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of |
|
|
|
As a % of |
|
|
|
As a % of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loan |
|
|
|
Total Loan |
|
|
|
Total Loan |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
|
Portfolio |
|
Georgia (1) |
|
|
$ |
14,543,534 |
|
|
|
|
53.0 |
% |
|
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
|
52.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta |
|
|
|
5,427,321 |
|
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Florida (1) |
|
|
|
3,593,893 |
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
West Coast of Florida |
|
|
|
2,847,694 |
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
South Carolina |
|
|
|
4,123,435 |
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
|
1,287,412 |
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Alabama |
|
|
|
3,897,617 |
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
27,445,891 |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loans in Georgia and Florida collectively represent 66.1% of our loan portfolio as of June 30,
2008. |
At June 30, 2008, total loans in the Atlanta market were $5.43 billion, or 19.8% of the total loan
portfolio, and increased $425.9 million, or 8.5%, compared to the same period in the prior year.
The Atlanta market includes commercial real estate (CRE) loans of $3.10 billion (which includes
$1.55 billion in 1-4 family properties) and commercial and industrial (C&I) loans of $1.91 billion
at June 30, 2008. Compared to June 30, 2007, CRE loans and C&I loans in the Atlanta market
increased by $122.8 million, or 4.1%, and $266.0 million, or 16.1%, respectively. On a sequential
quarter basis, Atlanta market loans grew at an annualized rate of 1.8%, CRE loan growth declined at
an annualized rate of 4.2%, and C&I loans grew at an annualized rate of 8.2%.
Total loans in the West Coast of Florida market were $2.85 billion, or 10.4% of the total loan
portfolio at June 30, 2008, and decreased $1.8 million, or 0.06% compared to the same period in the
prior year. The West Coast of Florida market includes CRE loans of $1.35 billion (which includes
$496.1 million in 1-4 family properties) and C&I loans of $1.16 billion at June 30, 2008. Compared
to June 30, 2007, CRE loans in the West Coast of Florida market decreased by $136.8 million, or
9.2%, and C&I loans increased by $101.3 million, or 9.6%. On a sequential quarter basis, loans
within the West Coast of Florida market remained relatively flat, declining at an annualized rate
of 0.5%, CRE loans declined at an annualized rate of 3.7%, and C&I loans grew at an annualized rate
of 0.6%.
36
Loans for investment property grew by $469.7 million, or 20.9% annualized, from December 31, 2007,
and increased $751.9 million, or 17.7%, compared to June 30, 2007. The primary loan types which
contributed to the growth within the investment property portfolio compared to December 31, 2007
were the hotels, office buildings, and other investment property (primarily
leased warehouses) categories. The growth in the investment property portfolio during the first
six months of 2008 is primarily due to advances on existing commitments. In addition, the
continued impact of a lack of exit capabilities in the market place with commercial mortgage-backed
securities (CMBS) has increased the duration of the investment property portfolio.
Commercial loans for 1-4 family properties at June 30, 2008 were $5.55 billion, down 9.5%
annualized from December 31, 2007 and accounted for 20.2% of total loans outstanding as of June 30,
2008. The following table shows the composition of the 1-4 family portfolio as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
1-4 Family |
|
|
|
1-4 Family |
|
|
|
1-4 Family |
|
|
|
1-4 Family |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
|
NPL |
|
|
|
NPL |
|
Georgia |
|
|
$ |
3,222,457 |
|
|
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
$ |
290,791 |
|
|
|
|
71.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta |
|
|
|
1,553,137 |
|
|
|
|
28.0 |
% |
|
|
|
233,929 |
|
|
|
|
57.4 |
% |
Florida |
|
|
|
648,510 |
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
|
70,319 |
|
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
West Coast of Florida |
|
|
|
496,121 |
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
66,629 |
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
South Carolina |
|
|
|
920,627 |
|
|
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
|
20,998 |
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Tennessee |
|
|
|
178,285 |
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
20,259 |
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Alabama |
|
|
|
580,112 |
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
|
5,264 |
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
5,549,991 |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
$ |
407,631 |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail loans at June 30, 2008 totaled $4.21 billion, representing 15.3% of the total loan
portfolio. Total retail loans grew by 13.0% compared to June 30, 2007 and grew at an annualized
rate of 16.2% on a sequential basis, led principally by growth in home equity and consumer mortgage
loans. The home equity loan portfolio consists primarily of loans with strong credit scores,
conservative debt-to-income ratios, and appropriate loan-to-value ratios. The utilization rate
(total amount outstanding as a percentage of total available lines) of this portfolio was
approximately 59% at June 30, 2008, compared to 57% a year ago. These loans are primarily extended
to customers who have an existing banking relationship with Synovus.
Credit Quality
Non-performing assets were $830.3 million at June 30, 2008, an increase of $150.9 million compared
to March 31, 2008, which included increases of $111.3 million in non-performing loans, $75.6
million in other real estate (ORE), and was partially off-set by a decrease of $35.9 million in
impaired loans held for sale. The increase in non-performing assets was significantly impacted by
the Atlanta market, where non-performing assets increased by $81.4 million. The Atlanta market
accounted for 45.9%, or $51.0 million, of the $111.3 million increase in non-performing loans
during the three months ended June 30, 2008. Total loans within the Atlanta portfolio accounted for
145 basis points of the non-performing assets ratio at June 30, 2008, and 29 basis points of the
sequential quarter increase.
The non-performing assets ratio (NPA ratio non-performing loans plus impaired loans held
37
for sale
and other real estate divided by total loans, impaired loans held for sale, and other real estate)
at June 30, 2008 was 3.00% compared to 1.67% at December 31, 2007 and 0.87% at June 30, 2007. The
net charge-off ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 1.04% compared to 0.25% for the
same period in the prior year and 0.46% for the year ended December 31, 2007. The net charge-off
ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 0.99% compared
to 0.19% during the same period in the prior year.
The following table shows the NPA ratio by state as of June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007, and June
30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
Georgia |
|
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
|
0.88 |
% |
Atlanta |
|
|
|
7.24 |
|
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
Florida |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
|
1.65 |
|
West Florida |
|
|
|
5.24 |
|
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
South Carolina |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
Alabama |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
|
1.67 |
% |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $70.7 million, an increase of $54.7
million compared to the same period a year ago. Net charge-offs for the three months ended June 30,
2008 included $22.9 million, or 33 basis points, of charge-offs from the Atlanta portfolio, and
$12.0 million, or 17 basis points, of charge-offs from the West Coast of Florida portfolio. Net
charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $134.5 million, an increase of $110.3
million compared to the same period in the prior year, and included $41.4 million, or 31 basis
points, of charge-offs within the Atlanta portfolio, and $40.2 million, or 30 basis points, in
charge-offs from the West Coast of Florida portfolio. The net charge-off ratio for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 was 0.99% compared to 0.19% for the same period in 2007 and 0.46% for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
Provision expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $184.7 million, an increase of $143.9
million compared to the same period in the prior year. The Atlanta market accounted for $36.7
million of the total provision expense, while the West Coast of Florida market accounted for $46.2
million of the total provision expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Total past due loans (and still accruing interest) were 1.33% of total loans at June 30, 2008
compared to 1.02% at December 31, 2007, and 0.64% at June 30, 2007. The year over year increase
was primarily due to increases in the one to four family residential portfolios in the Atlanta and
West Coast of Florida markets. Loans over 90 days past due and still accruing interest at June 30,
2008 were $39.6 million, or 0.14% of total loans, compared to 0.13% at December 31, 2007, and 0.09%
at June 30, 2007.
The allowance for loan losses was $417.8 million, or 1.52% of net loans, at June 30, 2008 compared
to $367.6 million, or 1.39% of net loans, at December 31, 2007, and $331.1 million, or 1.30% of net
loans, at June 30, 2007. The allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans coverage was 66.68%
at June 30, 2008, compared to 107.46% at December 31, 2007,
and
38
183.17% at June 30, 2007. The
decline in the coverage ratio is impacted by the increase in collateral-dependent impaired loans,
which have no allowance for loan losses as the estimated losses on these credits have been
charged-off. Therefore, a more meaningful allowance for loan losses coverage ratio is the
allowance to non-performing loans (excluding collateral-dependent impaired loans for which there is
no related allowance for loan losses), which was 206.82% at
June 30, 2008, compared to 337.49% at December 31, 2007 and 417.79% at June 30, 2007.
During times when non-performing loans are not significant, this coverage ratio which measures
the allowance for loan losses (which is there for the entire loan portfolio) against a small
non-performing loans total appears very large. As non-performing loans increase, this ratio
will decline even with significant incremental additions to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses allocated to non-performing loans (exclusive of collateral-dependent
impaired loans which have no allowance, as the estimated losses on these loans have already been
recognized) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
Non-performing
loans, excluding
collateral dependent
impaired loans which
have no allowance |
|
|
$ |
202.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
108.9 |
|
|
|
$ |
79.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated
allowance for loan
losses on above
loans |
|
|
$ |
41.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
20.5 |
|
|
|
$ |
22.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated allowance
as a % of loans |
|
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral-dependent impaired loans which have no allowance at June 30, 2008 (because they are
carried at fair value net of selling costs) totaled $424.5 million, or 67.8% of non-performing
loans. Net charge-offs recognized on collateral dependent impaired loans during the three months
ended June 30, 2008 were $26.5 million.
As of
June 30, 2008, the carrying value of impaired loans was $479.3 million. This balance reflects
approximately $63.7 million in partial charge-offs (approximately 12.0% of the original unpaid
principal balance) which we have recognized on these loans since they were placed on impaired
status.
39
The table below includes selected credit quality metrics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Non-performing loans (1) |
|
|
$ |
626,571 |
|
|
|
|
342,082 |
|
Impaired loans held for sale (2) |
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate |
|
|
|
197,328 |
|
|
|
|
101,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets |
|
|
$ |
830,264 |
|
|
|
|
443,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs quarter |
|
|
$ |
70,652 |
|
|
|
|
59,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs/Avg. loans quarter (3) |
|
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs YTD |
|
|
$ |
134,465 |
|
|
|
|
117,055 |
|
Net charge-offs/Avg. loans YTD |
|
|
|
0.99 |
% |
|
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans over 90 days past due and still
accruing |
|
|
$ |
39,614 |
|
|
|
|
33,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of loans |
|
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total past due loans and still accruing |
|
|
$ |
365,046 |
|
|
|
|
270,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of loans |
|
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
$ |
417,813 |
|
|
|
|
367,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a % of
loans |
|
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans as a % of total
loans |
|
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets as a % of total
loans, impaired loans held for sale,
and ORE |
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
|
1.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to non-performing loans |
|
|
|
66.68 |
% |
|
|
|
107.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to non-performing loans,
excluding impaired loans for which
there is no related allowance for loan
losses (4) |
|
|
|
206.82 |
% |
|
|
|
337.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $424.5 million and $233.2 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively, of loans considered to be impaired (consisting of collateral-dependent loans)
for which there is no related allowance for loan losses determined in accordance with SFAS
No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. The allowance on these loans
is zero because the estimated losses on collateral-dependent impaired loans have been
charged-off, at the time these loans were considered to be impaired. |
|
(2) |
|
Represent impaired loans that are intended to be sold. Held for sale loans are carried
at lower of cost or fair value. |
|
(3) |
|
Ratio is annualized. |
|
(4) |
|
Impaired loans for which there is no related allowance for loan losses as described in
note (1). |
Management continuously monitors non-performing and past due loans, to mitigate further
deterioration regarding the condition of these loans. Management believes non-performing loans and
loans past due over 90 days and still accruing include all material loans where known information
about possible credit problems of borrowers causes management to have serious
40
doubts as to the
collectibility of amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement.
The following table shows the composition of the loan portfolio and non-performing loans
(classified by loan type) as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
Non- |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
performing |
|
|
|
performing |
|
Loan Type |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
$ |
527,881 |
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
$ |
1,552 |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Hotels |
|
|
|
756,492 |
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Office buildings |
|
|
|
966,171 |
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
3,119 |
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Shopping centers |
|
|
|
965,130 |
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Commercial development |
|
|
|
909,965 |
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
12,573 |
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Other investment property |
|
|
|
873,902 |
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment
Properties |
|
|
|
4,999,541 |
|
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
19,041 |
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family construction |
|
|
|
1,971,819 |
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
220,194 |
|
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
1-4 family perm
/mini-perm |
|
|
|
1,350,463 |
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
32,661 |
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Residential development |
|
|
|
2,227,709 |
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
154,776 |
|
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 1-4 Family
Properties |
|
|
|
5,549,991 |
|
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
|
407,631 |
|
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Acquisition |
|
|
|
1,569,618 |
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
75,623 |
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Real
Estate |
|
|
|
12,119,150 |
|
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
|
502,295 |
|
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial,
and agricultural |
|
|
|
6,788,276 |
|
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
|
70,608 |
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Owner-occupied |
|
|
|
4,367,743 |
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
32,345 |
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and
Industrial Loans |
|
|
|
11,156,019 |
|
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
|
102,953 |
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
1,632,551 |
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
6,771 |
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Consumer mortgages |
|
|
|
1,723,689 |
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
12,486 |
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
|
299,850 |
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other retail loans |
|
|
|
555,507 |
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Retail |
|
|
|
4,211,597 |
|
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
21,323 |
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Unearned Income |
|
|
|
(40,875 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
27,445,891 |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
$ |
626,571 |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
Deposits
The following table presents the composition of deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
$ |
3,553,342 |
|
|
|
|
3,472,423 |
|
|
|
|
3,638,434 |
|
Money market |
|
|
|
6,784,667 |
|
|
|
|
7,091,885 |
|
|
|
|
7,264,790 |
|
NOW |
|
|
|
3,247,978 |
|
|
|
|
3,362,572 |
|
|
|
|
3,195,501 |
|
Savings |
|
|
|
459,888 |
|
|
|
|
442,824 |
|
|
|
|
489,467 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
|
7,395,175 |
|
|
|
|
6,837,570 |
|
|
|
|
6,999,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
$ |
21,441,050 |
|
|
|
|
21,207,274 |
|
|
|
|
21,587,785 |
|
Brokered money market |
|
|
|
1,019,501 |
|
|
|
|
465,146 |
|
|
|
|
437,988 |
|
Brokered time deposits |
|
|
|
3,567,801 |
|
|
|
|
3,287,396 |
|
|
|
|
3,275,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
$ |
26,028,352 |
|
|
|
|
24,959,816 |
|
|
|
|
25,301,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits at June 30, 2008 were $26.03 billion, an increase of $1.07 billion, or 8.6%
annualized, compared to December 31, 2007, and an increase of $726.6 million, or 2.9%, compared to
June 30, 2007. Total deposits excluding brokered deposits (core deposits) increased $233.8
million, or 2.2% annualized, compared to December 31, 2007, and decreased $146.7 million, or 0.7%,
compared to June 30, 2007. On a year over year basis, the decline was primarily related to a
decline in money market accounts, which decreased $480.1 million, or 6.6%, compared to the same
period in 2007. Actions currently being taken by Synovus to address deposit growth include
modifications to the incentive compensation programs to include a significant component of actual
incentives paid to be based on core deposit growth. On a sequential quarter basis, core deposits
increased $218.9 million, or 4.1% annualized. The majority of the growth was within time deposit
and non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts. On April 1, 2008, Synovus implemented a new
company-wide sales campaign, which focused on growing non-interest bearing deposit accounts in both
the commercial and retail customer bases. Synovus has also developed new money market and NOW
account products that were offered to commercial and retail customers during the three months ended
June 30, 3008.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Synovus has always placed great emphasis on maintaining a strong capital base and continues to
exceed regulatory capital requirements. Management is committed to maintaining a capital level
sufficient to assure shareholders, customers, and regulators that Synovus is financially sound, and
to enable Synovus to sustain an appropriate degree of leverage to provide a desirable level of
profitability. Based on internal calculations and previous regulatory exams, each of the subsidiary
banks is currently in compliance with regulatory capital guidelines and is considered well
capitalized.
42
The following table presents certain ratios used to measure Synovus capitalization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Total risk-based capital |
|
|
$ |
3,987,595 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,988,171 |
|
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets ratio |
|
|
|
12.29 |
% |
|
|
|
12.66 |
% |
Tier 1 capital ratio |
|
|
|
8.91 |
% |
|
|
|
9.11 |
% |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
|
8.70 |
% |
|
|
|
8.65 |
% |
Equity to assets ratio |
|
|
|
10.02 |
% |
|
|
|
10.42 |
% |
Tangible equity to tangible assets ratio (1) |
|
|
|
8.64 |
% |
|
|
|
8.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets from shareholders equity
and total assets. |
Continued credit deterioration and the resulting increases in non-performing assets and the
allowance for loan losses and a corresponding decrease in Synovus net interest margin may
adversely impact our liquidity position and capital ratios.
Synovus management, operating under liquidity and funding policies approved by the Board of
Directors, actively analyzes and manages the liquidity position in coordination with the subsidiary
banks. Management must ensure that adequate liquidity, at a reasonable cost, is available to meet
the cash flow needs of depositors, borrowers, and creditors. Management constantly monitors and
maintains appropriate levels of assets and liabilities so as to provide adequate funding sources to
meet estimated customer deposit withdrawals and future loan requests. Subsidiary banks have access
to overnight federal funds lines with various financial institutions, which can be drawn upon for
short-term liquidity needs. Subsidiary banks utilization of this funding source increased
modestly during the second quarter.
The Parent
Company requires cash for various operating needs including payment
of dividends to shareholders,
acquisitions, capital infusions into subsidiaries, the servicing of debt, and the payment of
general corporate expenses. The primary source of liquidity for the Parent Company is dividends
from the subsidiary banks, which are governed by certain rules and regulations of various state and
federal banking regulatory agencies. See the discussion of
Dividends Per Share below in this report. As a short-term liquidity source, the Parent Company has
access to a $25 million line of credit with an unaffiliated
banking organization. There were no
borrowings outstanding on this line of credit at June 30, 2008. The Parent Company has
historically enjoyed a solid reputation and credit standing in the
capital markets and has the ability to raise funds in the form of either short or long-term borrowings or equity issuances.
Maintaining adequate credit ratings is essential to Synovus continued cost-effective access to
these capital market funding sources. Given the weakened economy and current market conditions,
there is no assurance that the Parent Company will, if it chooses to do so, be able to obtain new
borrowings or issue additional equity on terms that are satisfactory.
Synovus believes that the sources of liquidity discussed above are
sufficient to meet its anticipated funding needs.
The consolidated statements of cash flows detail cash flows from operating, investing, and
financing activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, operating activities provided net
cash of $348.2 million, investing activities used $1.50 billion, and financing activities provided
$1.15 billion, resulting in a decrease in cash and due from banks of $7.7 million.
43
Earning Assets, Sources of Funds, and Net Interest Income
Average total assets of continuing operations for the first six months of 2008 were $33.4 billion,
an increase of 7.8% compared to the first six months of 2007. Average earning assets increased
6.6% in the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, and represented 91.7% of
average total assets. Average deposits increased $589.4 million, average federal funds purchased
and other short-term liabilities increased $567.8 million, average long-term debt increased $492.2
million, and average shareholders equity increased $668.9 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008 as compared to the same period last year. This growth provided the funding for $1.80
billion growth in average net loans and $93.8 million growth in average investment securities
(available for sale and trading securities).
Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $552.1 million, a decrease of $19.4
million, or 3.4%, compared to $571.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net interest
income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $273.4 million, a decrease of $15.1 million, or
5.2%, from $288.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 3.64%, down 39 basis points from
4.03% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007,
earning asset yields decreased by 149 basis points. Loan yields declined by 174 basis points,
primarily due to a 260 basis point decline in the average prime rate and higher levels of
nonperforming loans and interest charge-offs. The decline in earning asset yields was partially
offset by a 110 basis point decline in the effective cost of funds. The most significant decreases
in funding costs were realized in core money markets, which declined by 189 basis points, and fed
funds purchased and other short term liabilities, which declined by 232 basis points.
On a sequential quarter basis, net interest income decreased by $5.2 million, while the net
interest margin decreased 14 basis points to 3.57%. The net interest margin decline included a 3
basis point decrease related to increased credit costs, which results
from loans placed on non-accrual and the reversal of accrued interest
on those loans at the time of their change to non-accrual status. The remainder of the decline was primarily
due to lower average short-term rates and the continued very competitive deposit markets. Yields on
earning assets declined by 73 basis points as loan yields decreased by 82 basis points. This
decrease was driven by a 113 basis point decrease in the average prime rate and a higher level of
non-performing loans and interest charge-offs. The effective cost of funds decreased by 59 basis
points. This decrease was driven by a 83 basis point decrease in core money market yields and a
115 basis point decrease in the cost of federal funds purchased and other short-term liabilities.
The direction of the margin during the remainder of 2008 will be significantly influenced by
deposit pricing competition, trends in credit costs, and any additional Federal Reserve Bank rate
actions. Competitive deposit market conditions are not expected to moderate in the near term and
could negatively impact the margin in the second half of this year.
44
Quarterly yields earned on average interest-earning assets and rates paid on average
interest-bearing liabilities for the five most recent quarters are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
Second |
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
|
|
Interest Earning Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable investment securities |
|
$ |
3,556,381 |
|
|
|
3,485,370 |
|
|
|
3,496,843 |
|
|
|
3,495,017 |
|
|
|
3,420,831 |
|
Yield |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
Tax-exempt investment securities |
|
$ |
137,606 |
|
|
|
154,408 |
|
|
|
164,587 |
|
|
|
170,211 |
|
|
|
178,183 |
|
Yield |
|
|
7.34 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
26,531 |
|
|
|
36,652 |
|
|
|
29,698 |
|
|
|
56,217 |
|
|
|
59,311 |
|
Yield |
|
|
5.88 |
% |
|
|
6.96 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
7.15 |
|
|
|
6.47 |
|
Commercial loans (1) |
|
$ |
23,183,128 |
|
|
|
22,763,954 |
|
|
|
22,157,460 |
|
|
|
21,820,687 |
|
|
|
21,739,107 |
|
Yield |
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
6.79 |
|
|
|
7.69 |
|
|
|
8.13 |
|
|
|
8.20 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
$ |
966,111 |
|
|
|
931,644 |
|
|
|
928,942 |
|
|
|
915,847 |
|
|
|
896,267 |
|
Yield |
|
|
7.53 |
% |
|
|
7.86 |
|
|
|
8.05 |
|
|
|
8.17 |
|
|
|
8.14 |
|
Mortgage loans |
|
$ |
1,252,275 |
|
|
|
1,241,018 |
|
|
|
1,237,962 |
|
|
|
1,152,621 |
|
|
|
1,110,754 |
|
Yield |
|
|
6.54 |
% |
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
7.04 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
7.03 |
|
Credit card loans |
|
$ |
291,143 |
|
|
|
296,428 |
|
|
|
285,410 |
|
|
|
277,445 |
|
|
|
275,105 |
|
Yield |
|
|
8.60 |
% |
|
|
9.65 |
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
|
|
10.96 |
|
|
|
10.64 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
$ |
1,605,601 |
|
|
|
1,557,852 |
|
|
|
1,517,510 |
|
|
|
1,444,411 |
|
|
|
1,407,005 |
|
Yield |
|
|
5.31 |
% |
|
|
6.48 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
7.80 |
|
|
|
7.82 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
(397,392 |
) |
|
|
(381,695 |
) |
|
|
(357,283 |
) |
|
|
(335,406 |
) |
|
|
(329,028 |
) |
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
$ |
26,900,866 |
|
|
|
26,409,201 |
|
|
|
25,770,001 |
|
|
|
25,275,605 |
|
|
|
25,099,210 |
|
Yield |
|
|
6.12 |
% |
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
|
7.79 |
|
|
|
8.21 |
|
|
|
8.26 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
$ |
157,049 |
|
|
|
121,806 |
|
|
|
108,044 |
|
|
|
176,448 |
|
|
|
163,364 |
|
Yield |
|
|
5.86 |
% |
|
|
5.57 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
|
|
|
6.91 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
Federal funds sold and other
short-term investments |
|
$ |
201,081 |
|
|
|
128,381 |
|
|
|
110,745 |
|
|
|
85,094 |
|
|
|
131,029 |
|
Yield |
|
|
1.83 |
% |
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Earning Assets |
|
$ |
30,979,514 |
|
|
|
30,335,818 |
|
|
|
29,679,918 |
|
|
|
29,258,592 |
|
|
|
29,051,928 |
|
Yield |
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
6.69 |
|
|
|
7.42 |
|
|
|
7.78 |
|
|
|
7.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
3,154,884 |
|
|
|
3,200,650 |
|
|
|
3,200,408 |
|
|
|
3,047,279 |
|
|
|
3,141,899 |
|
Rate |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
$ |
6,826,724 |
|
|
|
7,017,644 |
|
|
|
7,502,063 |
|
|
|
7,421,900 |
|
|
|
7,217,265 |
|
Rate |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
$ |
461,970 |
|
|
|
448,581 |
|
|
|
454,204 |
|
|
|
479,479 |
|
|
|
497,422 |
|
Rate |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
Time deposits under $100,000 |
|
$ |
2,814,714 |
|
|
|
2,777,764 |
|
|
|
2,790,869 |
|
|
|
2,917,089 |
|
|
|
3,020,881 |
|
Rate |
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
|
4.69 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
|
Time deposits over $100,000 (less
brokered time deposits) |
|
$ |
4,316,454 |
|
|
|
4,171,716 |
|
|
|
4,006,350 |
|
|
|
4,029,091 |
|
|
|
4,118,221 |
|
Rate |
|
|
4.09 |
% |
|
|
4.69 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing core deposits |
|
$ |
17,574,746 |
|
|
|
17,616,355 |
|
|
|
17,953,894 |
|
|
|
17,894,838 |
|
|
|
17,995,688 |
|
Rate |
|
|
2.68 |
% |
|
|
3.29 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
Brokered money market accounts |
|
$ |
1,082,805 |
|
|
|
854,385 |
|
|
|
467,346 |
|
|
|
476,377 |
|
|
|
426,988 |
|
Rate |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
5.34 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
Brokered time deposits |
|
$ |
3,495,947 |
|
|
|
3,300,677 |
|
|
|
2,941,592 |
|
|
|
3,188,310 |
|
|
|
3,175,161 |
|
Rate |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
22,153,498 |
|
|
|
21,771,417 |
|
|
|
21,362,832 |
|
|
|
21,559,525 |
|
|
|
21,597,837 |
|
Rate |
|
|
2.82 |
% |
|
|
3.46 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
Federal funds purchased and other
short-term liabilities |
|
$ |
2,302,986 |
|
|
|
2,253,640 |
|
|
|
2,472,339 |
|
|
|
1,930,598 |
|
|
|
1,720,535 |
|
Rate |
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,048,213 |
|
|
|
1,930,412 |
|
|
|
1,819,198 |
|
|
|
1,660,788 |
|
|
|
1,552,310 |
|
Rate |
|
|
3.44 |
% |
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities |
|
$ |
26,504,697 |
|
|
|
25,955,469 |
|
|
|
25,654,369 |
|
|
|
25,150,911 |
|
|
|
24,870,682 |
|
Rate |
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
3.48 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
3,448,794 |
|
|
|
3,338,106 |
|
|
|
3,422,684 |
|
|
|
3,405,622 |
|
|
|
3,428,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Margin |
|
|
3.57 |
% |
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Impaired loans held for sale are included in commercial loans. |
45
Yields earned on average interest-earning assets and rates paid on average interest-bearing
liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Interest Earning Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable Investment Securities |
|
$ |
3,520,875 |
|
|
|
3,361,314 |
|
Yield |
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
|
4.78 |
|
Tax-Exempt Investment Securities |
|
$ |
146,007 |
|
|
|
181,579 |
|
Yield |
|
|
7.16 |
% |
|
|
6.78 |
|
Trading Account Assets |
|
$ |
31,592 |
|
|
|
61,744 |
|
Yield |
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
6.01 |
|
Commercial Loans |
|
$ |
22,973,543 |
|
|
|
21,492,384 |
|
Yield |
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
8.22 |
|
Consumer Loans |
|
$ |
948,878 |
|
|
|
912,173 |
|
Yield |
|
|
7.69 |
% |
|
|
8.07 |
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
$ |
1,246,646 |
|
|
|
1,096,337 |
|
Yield |
|
|
6.69 |
% |
|
|
7.01 |
|
Credit Card Loans |
|
$ |
293,785 |
|
|
|
272,787 |
|
Yield |
|
|
9.14 |
% |
|
|
10.90 |
|
Home Equity Loans |
|
$ |
1,581,726 |
|
|
|
1,396,069 |
|
Yield |
|
|
5.89 |
% |
|
|
7.76 |
|
Allowance for Loan Losses |
|
$ |
(389,544 |
) |
|
|
(323,533 |
) |
|
|
|
Loans, Net |
|
$ |
26,655,034 |
|
|
|
24,846,217 |
|
Yield |
|
|
6.53 |
% |
|
|
8.27 |
|
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale |
|
$ |
139,427 |
|
|
|
161,931 |
|
Yield |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.13 |
|
Federal funds Sold and Other Short-Term Investments |
|
$ |
164,731 |
|
|
|
139,397 |
|
Yield |
|
|
2.40 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Earning Assets |
|
$ |
30,657,666 |
|
|
|
28,752,182 |
|
Yield |
|
|
6.32 |
% |
|
|
7.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Demand Deposits |
|
$ |
3,177,767 |
|
|
|
3,127,793 |
|
Rate |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
2.29 |
|
Money Market Accounts |
|
$ |
6,922,184 |
|
|
|
7,098,269 |
|
Rate |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
4.46 |
|
Savings Deposits |
|
$ |
455,276 |
|
|
|
500,170 |
|
Rate |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
|
Time Deposits under $100,000 |
|
$ |
2,796,239 |
|
|
|
3,029,301 |
|
Rate |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
|
4.82 |
|
Time Deposits over $100,000 (less brokered time deposits) |
|
$ |
4,244,085 |
|
|
|
4,109,892 |
|
Rate |
|
|
4.38 |
% |
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Bearing Core Deposits |
|
$ |
17,595,551 |
|
|
|
17,865,425 |
|
Rate |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
4.20 |
|
Brokered Money Market Accounts |
|
$ |
968,595 |
|
|
|
392,970 |
|
Rate |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
5.46 |
|
Brokered Time Deposits |
|
$ |
3,398,312 |
|
|
|
3,103,376 |
|
Rate |
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Bearing Deposits |
|
$ |
21,962,458 |
|
|
|
21,361,771 |
|
Rate |
|
|
3.01 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
|
Federal funds Purchased and Other Short-Term Liabilities |
|
$ |
2,278,313 |
|
|
|
1,710,475 |
|
Rate |
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
|
4.88 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
1,989,312 |
|
|
|
1,497,083 |
|
Rate |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities |
|
$ |
26,230,083 |
|
|
|
24,569,329 |
|
Rate |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Bearing Demand Deposits |
|
$ |
3,393,450 |
|
|
|
3,404,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Margin |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
|
46
The following table summarizes the components of net interest income for the six and three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, including the tax-equivalent adjustment that is required in making
yields on tax-exempt loans and investment securities comparable to taxable loans and investment
securities. The taxable-equivalent adjustment is based on a 35% Federal income tax rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
$ |
962,020 |
|
|
|
|
1,112,391 |
|
|
|
|
458,140 |
|
|
|
|
564,492 |
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable-equivalent |
|
|
|
964,331 |
|
|
|
|
1,115,020 |
|
|
|
|
459,274 |
|
|
|
|
565,777 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
409,950 |
|
|
|
|
540,967 |
|
|
|
|
184,719 |
|
|
|
|
276,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable-equivalent |
|
|
$ |
554,381 |
|
|
|
|
574,053 |
|
|
|
|
274,555 |
|
|
|
|
289,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Income
The following table summarizes non-interest income for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
$ |
54,461 |
|
|
|
54,420 |
|
|
|
|
26,070 |
|
|
|
28,050 |
|
Fiduciary and asset management fees |
|
|
|
25,519 |
|
|
|
25,129 |
|
|
|
|
12,898 |
|
|
|
12,657 |
|
Brokerage and investment banking
revenue |
|
|
|
17,693 |
|
|
|
15,259 |
|
|
|
|
9,206 |
|
|
|
7,809 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
|
13,847 |
|
|
|
14,920 |
|
|
|
|
5,686 |
|
|
|
7,695 |
|
Bankcard fees |
|
|
|
26,417 |
|
|
|
23,447 |
|
|
|
|
14,198 |
|
|
|
11,567 |
|
Net gains on sales of available for
sale investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
Other fee income |
|
|
|
21,266 |
|
|
|
19,838 |
|
|
|
|
10,081 |
|
|
|
10,411 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
|
33,744 |
|
|
|
30,116 |
|
|
|
|
13,373 |
|
|
|
17,883 |
|
Proceeds from sale of MasterCard shares |
|
|
|
16,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemption of Visa shares |
|
|
|
38,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
$ |
247,675 |
|
|
|
183,834 |
|
|
|
|
107,698 |
|
|
|
96,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $247.7 million, up 34.7%, from
the same period in 2007. Excluding the $38.5 million gain on redemption of Visa shares, total
non-interest income increased $25.3 million, or 13.8%, compared to same period a year ago. Total
non-interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $107.7 million, up 11.8% compared
to the same period in 2007.
Service charges on deposit accounts, the single largest component of fee income, were $54.5 million
and $26.1 million, respectively, for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, up 0.1% and down
7.1% from the same periods in 2007, respectively. Service charges on deposit
47
accounts consist of
non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees (which represent 63.4% and 60.2% of the total for the six and three
months ended June 30, 2008), account analysis fees, and all other service charges.
NSF fees for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 were $34.5 million and $15.7 million,
down $3.1 million, or 8.4%, and $3.8 million, or 19.7% compared to the same periods in 2007.
Account analysis fees were $11.5 million and $6.1 million for the six and three months ended June
30, 2008, respectively, and increased by $4.3 million, or 59.1%, and $2.4 million, or 66.5%,
compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase in account analysis fees was primarily
due to lower earnings credits on commercial demand deposit accounts. All other service charges on
deposit accounts, which consist primarily of monthly fees on retail demand deposit and saving
accounts, were $8.5 million and $4.2 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, down $1.1 million, or 11.4%, and $579 thousand, or 12.0%, compared to the same
periods in 2007. The decline in all other service charges for the six and three months ended June
30, 2008 was largely due to a continued market emphasis of checking accounts with no monthly
service charge and a decline on fees for check orders.
Financial management services revenues (which primarily consist of fiduciary and asset management
fees, brokerage and investment banking revenue, and customer interest rate swap revenue which is
included in other fee income) increased 13.1% to $51.9 million for the six months ended June 30,
2008, and increased 8.8% to $26.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to
the same periods in 2007. The financial management services revenue growth was led by increases in
fees from customer interest rate swaps and brokerage and investment banking revenues.
Mortgage banking income decreased $1.1 million, or 7.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008,
and decreased $2.0 million, or 26.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the
same periods in 2007. The decline was primarily related to the decline in mortgage production,
which declined $107.9 million, or 13.7% and $61.3 million, or 15.2%, for the six and three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in the prior year. The results for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 also included a $1.2 million increase in revenues due to the adoption of the
SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value
Through Earnings.
Other operating income increased $3.6 million, or 12.0%, and decreased $4.5 million, or 25.2%, for
the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods in 2007,
respectively. This increase included a $4.9 million gain in 2008 on increase in the fair value of
private equity investments.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, MasterCard conducted a conversion and sale program
permitting the sale of a limited number of Class B shares, which are otherwise subject to
restrictions on sale until 2010. Synovus recognized a gain of $16.2 million on the sale of a
portion of its shares under the conversion and sale program.
Synovus recognized a pre-tax gain of $38.5 million on redemption of a portion of its membership
interest in Visa, Inc. as a result of Visas initial public offering (the Visa IPO). The gain from
the proceeds of the Visa IPO is reflected as a component of non-interest income for the six months
ended June 30, 2008. For further discussion of Visa, see section titled Non-Interest Expense
below.
48
Non-Interest Expense
The following table summarizes non-interest expense for the six and three months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Salaries and other personnel expense |
|
|
$ |
232,614 |
|
|
|
229,749 |
|
|
|
|
110,483 |
|
|
|
115,822 |
|
Net occupancy and equipment expense |
|
|
|
61,340 |
|
|
|
54,860 |
|
|
|
|
31,130 |
|
|
|
27,572 |
|
FDIC insurance and other regulatory
fees |
|
|
|
12,250 |
|
|
|
4,698 |
|
|
|
|
6,172 |
|
|
|
2,315 |
|
Impaired loans held for sale and
other real estate costs |
|
|
|
31,502 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
23,621 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees |
|
|
|
16,697 |
|
|
|
10,245 |
|
|
|
|
11,756 |
|
|
|
4,743 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
103,365 |
|
|
|
91,755 |
|
|
|
|
55,802 |
|
|
|
46,631 |
|
Visa litigation expense |
|
|
|
(17,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
$ |
467,338 |
|
|
|
392,457 |
|
|
|
|
265,964 |
|
|
|
197,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense increased by 19.1% and 34.6% for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008,
compared to the same periods in the prior year. Excluding the reduction in the Visa litigation
accrual and the charge for impairment of goodwill, non-interest expense increased by 16.6% and
20.9% for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
For the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, salaries and other personnel expenses increased
by $2.9 million, or 1.2%, and decreased $5.3 million, or 4.6%, compared to the same periods in the
prior year. The 2008 amounts reflect a reduction in accruals for performance-based pay. Total
employees at June 30, 2008 were 7,275, down 56 compared to March 31, 2008, and down 26 compared to
the prior year.
Net occupancy and equipment expense increased $6.5 million, or 11.8%, and $3.6 million, or 12.9%,
for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in the prior year.
The increase in occupancy and equipment expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 include
approximately $2.0 million in costs associated with the addition of new branch locations.
During 2007, the FDIC reinstituted the FDIC insurance assessment. In conjunction with the
reinstituted assessment, the FDIC granted credits, which were fully utilized by early 2008. The
increase in FDIC insurance and regulatory fees is substantially the result of expense recognized in 2008,
following full recognition of credits, associated with the FDIC insurance assessment.
The increase in professional fees for both the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 include
legal fees paid in connection with the FDIC investigation, which is discussed in Part II Item 1:
Legal Proceedings, and professional fees associated with Project Optimus, Synovus initiative to
identify opportunities to increase revenues and reduce costs.
The increase in other operating expenses for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 reflects
the $2.4 million civil money penalty, discussed in Part II Item 1: Legal Proceedings, and a $4.1
million provision for unfunded commitments. Synovus has historically assessed the
49
loss exposure associated with unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at each financial
statement date. Previous assessments have resulted in inconsequential estimated loss exposure
amounts. The negative credit migration that occurred during the second quarter of 2008 in certain
credits resulted in an estimated loss exposure of $4.1 million.
During the second half of 2007, Synovus recognized litigation expenses of $36.8 million associated
with indemnification obligations arising from Synovus ownership interest in Visa. During the six
months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus reversed $17.4 million of the accrued litigation expense it
recognized in the second half of 2007 as its proportionate share of the $3.0 billion escrow fund
established by Visa to settle covered litigation out of the Visa IPO proceeds. For further
discussion of Visa, see section titled Non-Interest Income above.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $53.0 million and $9.3 million based on income from continuing operations of
$146.0 million and $21.4 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008. The effective
income tax rate, which was impacted by non-deductible impairment of goodwill, was 36.3% for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
In the normal course of business, Synovus is subject to examinations from various tax authorities.
These examinations may alter the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions or the allocation
of income among tax jurisdictions. The total liability for uncertain tax positions under FIN 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 is $6.4
million and $6.9 million at June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Synovus is not able to reasonably
estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time; however, at this
time, Synovus does not expect a significant payment related to these obligations within the next
year.
Synovus continually monitors and evaluates the potential impact of current events and circumstances
on the estimates and assumptions used in the analysis of its income tax positions, and,
accordingly, Synovus effective tax rate may fluctuate in the future.
Dividends per Share
As a result of the TSYS spin-off, Synovus adjusted its cash dividend so that Synovus shareholders
who retained their TSYS shares would initially receive, in the aggregate, the same cash dividends
per share that were paid before the spin-off. As a result, Synovus adjusted its cash dividend per
share for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 to $0.3400 and $0.1700, respectively. Prior
to the TSYS spin-off, Synovus paid a cash dividend for the six and three months ended June 30, 2007
of $0.4100 and $0.2050, respectively. The dividend payout ratio for the six months ended June 30,
2008 was 121.1%, as compared to 43.7% for the same period in 2007.
Management
closely monitors trends and developments in credit quality,
liquidity, financial markets and other
economic trends, as well as regulatory requirements, all of which
impact Synovus capital position,
and will periodically review the dividend payout ratio to determine whether the payout ratio is
appropriate in light of these factors.
50
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 31, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141R
clarifies the definitions of both a business combination and a business. All business combinations
will be accounted for under the acquisition method (previously referred to as the purchase method).
This standard defines the acquisition date as the only relevant date for recognition and
measurement of the fair value of consideration paid. SFAS No. 141R requires the acquirer to
expense all acquisition related costs. SFAS No. 141R will also require acquired loans to be
recorded net of the allowance for loan losses on the date of acquisition. SFAS No. 141R defines
the measurement period as the time after the acquisition date during which the acquirer may make
adjustments to the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date. This period cannot
exceed one year, and any subsequent adjustments made to provisional amounts are done
retrospectively and restate prior period data. The provisions of this statement are effective for
business combinations during fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Synovus is currently
evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 141R will have on its financial position and results of
operations and believes that such determination will not be meaningful until Synovus enters into a
business combination.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 requires non-controlling
interests to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside
of equity. Disclosure requirements include net income and comprehensive income to be displayed for
both the controlling and noncontrolling interests and a separate schedule that shows the effects of
any transactions with the noncontrolling interests on the equity attributable to the controlling
interests. The provisions for this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 31, 2008. This statement should be applied prospectively except for the presentation and
disclosure requirements which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Synovus
does not expect the impact of SFAS No. 160 on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows to be material.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 changes the disclosure
requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Disclosure requirements include
qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative
disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains/losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures
about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The provisions for this
statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2009. The impact to Synovus
will be additional disclosure in SEC filings.
51
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
Interest rate risk is the primary market risk to which Synovus is potentially exposed. As of the
end of the second quarter, the interest rate risk position of Synovus has changed modestly as
compared to December 31, 2007. A further decline in short-term interest rates would be expected to
have a modest negative impact on net interest income as implied rate floors are reached on lower
cost core deposits. An expected increase in fixed rate asset prepayments would also negatively
impact net interest income. This impact has been moderated somewhat by a significant amount of
variable rate loans reaching a floor rate and effectively becoming fixed rate loans in a declining
rate environment. A rising rate environment would be expected to have a moderately positive impact
on net interest income. A rising rate environment would positively impact overall loan yields, as
loan growth has been more concentrated in variable rate loans this year. Deposit rate repricing
would be expected to lag somewhat in a rising rate environment and have a favorable impact on net
interest income.
Synovus measures its sensitivity to changes in market interest rates through the use of a
simulation model. Synovus uses this simulation model to determine a baseline net interest income
forecast and the sensitivity of this forecast to changes in interest rates. These simulations
include all of Synovus earning assets, liabilities, and derivative instruments. Forecasted
balance sheet changes, primarily reflecting loan and deposit growth forecasts, are included in the
periods modeled. Anticipated deposit mix changes in each interest rate scenario are also included
in the periods modeled.
Synovus models its baseline net interest income forecast assuming an unchanged or flat interest
rate environment. Synovus has modeled the impact of a gradual increase and decrease in short-term
rates of 100 basis points to determine the sensitivity of net interest income for the next twelve
months. The following table represents the estimated sensitivity of net interest income to these
gradual changes in short term interest rates at June 30, 2008, with comparable information for
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated % Change in Net Interest Income |
Change in Short-Term |
|
as Compared to Unchanged Rates |
Interest Rates |
|
(for the next twelve months) |
(in basis points) |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
+ 100 |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
- 100 |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While these estimates are reflective of the general interest rate sensitivity of Synovus, local
market conditions and their impact on loan and deposit pricing would be expected to have a
significant impact on the realized level of net interest income. Actual realized balance sheet
growth and mix would also impact the realized level of net interest income. Synovus also considers
the interest rate sensitivity of non-interest income, primarily deposit account analysis fees,
mortgage banking income, and financial management services income, in determining the appropriate
net interest income sensitivity positioning.
52
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report as required by Rule 13a-15
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and
chief financial officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
relating to Synovus (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in our
periodic SEC filings. No change in Synovus internal control over financial reporting occurred
during the period covered by this report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
53
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Synovus and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the
ordinary course of its business. In the ordinary course of business, Synovus and its subsidiaries
are also subject to regulatory examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries and
investigations. Synovus establishes accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when those
matters present loss contingencies that Synovus determines to be both probable and reasonably
estimable. Based on current knowledge, advice of counsel and available insurance coverage,
management does not believe that the eventual outcome of pending litigation and/or regulatory
matters, including the regulatory matter described below, will have a material adverse effect on
Synovus consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, in the
event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these
matters, if unfavorable, may be material to Synovus results of operations for any particular
period.
As previously disclosed, the FDIC conducted an investigation of the policies, practices and
procedures used by Columbus Bank and Trust Company (CB&T), a wholly owned banking subsidiary of
Synovus Financial Corp. (Synovus), in connection with the credit card programs offered pursuant to
its Affinity Agreement with CompuCredit Corporation (CompuCredit). CB&T issues credit cards that
are marketed and serviced by CompuCredit pursuant to the Affinity Agreement. A provision of the
Affinity Agreement generally requires CompuCredit to indemnify CB&T for losses incurred as a result
of the failure of credit card programs offered pursuant to the Affinity Agreement to comply with
applicable law. Synovus is subject to a per event 10% share of any such loss, but Synovus 10%
payment obligation is limited to a cumulative total of $2 million for all losses incurred.
On June 9, 2008, the FDIC and CB&T entered into a settlement related to this investigation. CB&T
did not admit or deny any alleged violations of law or regulations or any unsafe and unsound
banking practices in connection with the settlement. As a part of the settlement, CB&T and the FDIC
entered into a Cease and Desist Order and Order to Pay whereby CB&T agreed to: (1) pay a civil
money penalty in the amount of $2.4 million; (2) institute certain changes to CB&Ts policies,
practices and procedures in connection with credit card programs; (3) continue to implement its
compliance plan to maintain a sound risk-based compliance management system and to modify them, if
necessary, to comply with the Order; and (4) maintain its previously established Director
Compliance Committee to oversee compliance with the Order. CB&T has paid the civil money penalty,
and that payment is not subject to the indemnification provisions of the Affinity Agreement
described above.
CB&T and the FDIC also entered into an Order for Restitution pursuant to which CB&T agreed to
establish and maintain an account in the amount of $7.5 million to ensure the availability of
restitution with respect to categories of consumers, specified by the FDIC, who activated Aspire
credit card accounts issued pursuant to the Affinity Agreement on or before May 31, 2005. The FDIC
may require the account to be applied under the following circumstances: (1) if CompuCredit is
required by an order or other agreement with the FDIC or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC),
including an order or agreement issued or made pursuant to a settlement arrangement, to pay
restitution to any consumers who activated their Aspire credit cards before May 31, 2005, and
CompuCredit defaults, in whole or in part, on its obligation to make the required restitution, the
FDIC may require the account to be applied to the extent of such default; or (2) if the FDIC and
the FTC are unable to obtain an order or agreement requiring
54
CompuCredit to pay restitution to any consumers who activated their Aspire credit cards before May
31, 2005, because of a reason other than the merits of their claims and despite making reasonable
efforts to do so, the FDIC may require the account to be applied in full. This $7.5 million account
represents a contingent liability of CB&T. At June 30, 2008, CB&T has not recorded a liability for
this contingency. Any amounts paid from the restitution account are expected to be subject to the
indemnification provisions of the Affinity Agreement described above. Synovus does not currently
expect that the settlement will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On May 23, 2008, CompuCredit and its wholly owned subsidiary, CompuCredit Acquisition Corporation,
sued CB&T and Synovus in the State Court of Fulton County, Georgia, alleging breach of contract
with respect to the Affinity Agreement. CompuCredit seeks compensatory and general damages in an
unspecified amount, a full accounting of the shares received by CB&T and Synovus in connection with
the MasterCard and Visa initial public offerings and remittance of certain of those shares to
CompuCredit, and the transfer of accounts under the Affinity Agreement to a third-party. CB&T and
Synovus intend to vigorously defend themselves against these allegations. Based on current
knowledge and advice of counsel, management does not believe that the eventual outcome of this case
will have a material adverse effect on Synovus consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows. It is possible, however, that in the event of unexpected future
developments the ultimate resolution of this matter, if unfavorable, may be material to Synovus
results of operations for any particular period.
55
ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, you should carefully consider the
factors discussed in Part I under the caption Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial
position, results of operations or cash flows or future results. The risks described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing Synovus. Additional risks and uncertainties not
currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows or future results.
Other than the risk factors set forth below, there were no material changes during the period
covered by this Report to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Synovus Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The current and further deterioration in the residential construction and commercial development
real estate markets may lead to increased non-performing assets in our loan portfolio and increased
provision expense for losses on loans, which could have a material
adverse effect on our capital,
financial condition and results of operations.
Since the third quarter of 2007, the residential construction and commercial development real
estate markets have experienced a variety of difficulties and changed economic conditions. In
particular, market conditions in the Atlanta and the West Coast of
Florida markets, which combined represent 66% of non-performing assets
at June 30, 2008, have experienced
continued declines in credit quality since the end of 2007. Synovus non-performing assets were $830.3 million
at June 30, 2008, compared to $443.6 million at December 31, 2007. Non-performing assets in the
Atlanta area and West Coast of Florida markets represented 48% and 18%, respectively, of Synovus
total non-performing assets at
June 30, 2008. If market conditions continue to deteriorate, they may lead to additional valuation
adjustments on our loan portfolios and real estate owned as we continue to reassess the market
value of our loan portfolio, the loss severities of loans in default, and the net realizable value
of real estate owned. Poor economic conditions could result in decreased demand for residential
housing, which, in turn, could adversely affect the development and construction efforts of
residential real estate developers. Consequently, such economic downturns could adversely affect
the ability of such residential real estate developer borrowers to repay these loans and the value
of property used as collateral for such loans. While Synovus believes
that the severity of market conditions in the Atlanta and West Coast
of Florida markets are related to factors which are specific to those individual
markets, management continually monitors market conditions and
economic factors throughout Synovus footprint for indications of change
in other markets. Any further increase in our non-performing assets and related
increases in our provision expense for losses on loans could negatively affect our business and
could have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.
Our allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses, and we may be required to
materially increase our allowance, which may adversely affect our capital, financial condition and
results of operations.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for
loan losses charged to expense, which represents managements best estimate of probable credit
losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans, all as described under Item
56
2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance, in the judgment of
management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan
portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses inherently
involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current
credit risks using existing qualitative and quantitative information, all of which may undergo
material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding
existing loans, identification of additional problem loans, and other factors, both within and
outside of our control, may require an increase in the allowance for loan losses. In addition, bank
regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require an increase
in the provision for loan losses or the recognition of additional loan charge offs, based on
judgments different than those of management. An increase in the allowance for loan losses results
in a decrease in net income, and possibly risk-based capital, and may have a material adverse
effect on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.
Synovus net interest income could be negatively affected by the lower level of short-term interest
rates, recent developments in the credit and real estate markets and competition in our primary
market area.
Net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income that we earn on
interest-earning assets and the interest expense that we pay on interest-bearing liabilities, is a
major component of our income. Our income is in turn our primary source of funding for our
operations, including extending credit and reserving for loan losses. The Federal Reserve reduced
interest rates on three occasions in 2007 by a total of 100 basis points, to 4.25%, and by another
225 basis points, to 2.00%, during the first four months of 2008. A significant portion of our
loans, including residential construction and development loans and other commercial loans, bear
interest at variable rates. The interest rates on these loans decrease when the Federal Reserve
reduces interest rates, which may reduce our net interest income. In addition, in order to compete
for deposits in our primary market areas, we may offer more attractive interest rates to
depositors, and we may increasingly rely on out-of-market or brokered deposits as a source of
liquidity.
Increased credit costs and the decrease in interest rates reduced our net interest income during
the first six months of 2008 and could cause additional pressure on
net interest income in future periods. This reduction in net interest income may also be exacerbated by the high
level of competition that we face in our primary market area. Any significant reduction in our net
interest income could negatively affect our business and could have a material adverse impact on
our capital, financial condition and results of operations.
57
ITEM 2 UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
In prior periods, Synovus received previously owned shares of its common stock in payment of the
exercise price of stock options and shares withheld to cover taxes on vesting for non-vested shares
granted. No shares of Synovus common stock were delivered during the three months ended June 30,
2008.
58
ITEM 4 SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The annual shareholders meeting was held on April 24, 2008. Following is a summary of the
proposals that were submitted to the shareholders for approval and a tabulation of the votes with
respect to each proposal.
Proposal I
The proposal was to elect nineteen directors of Synovus to serve until the 2009 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld Authority to Vote |
|
Daniel P. Amos |
|
|
2,715,097,418 |
|
|
|
31,136,914 |
|
Richard E. Anthony |
|
|
2,712,382,683 |
|
|
|
33,851,649 |
|
James H. Blanchard |
|
|
2,708,055,173 |
|
|
|
38,179,159 |
|
Richard Y. Bradley |
|
|
2,615,162,411 |
|
|
|
131,071,921 |
|
Frank W. Brumley |
|
|
2,714,679,132 |
|
|
|
31,555,200 |
|
Elizabeth W. Camp |
|
|
2,718,859,561 |
|
|
|
27,374,771 |
|
Gardiner W. Garrard, Jr. |
|
|
2,677,916,304 |
|
|
|
68,318,028 |
|
T. Michael Goodrich |
|
|
2,717,176,836 |
|
|
|
29,057,496 |
|
Frederick L. Green, III |
|
|
2,712,878,843 |
|
|
|
33,355,489 |
|
V. Nathaniel Hansford |
|
|
2,712,601,676 |
|
|
|
33,632,656 |
|
Alfred W. Jones, III (1) |
|
|
2,708,212,796 |
|
|
|
38,021,536 |
|
Mason H. Lampton |
|
|
2,714,456,076 |
|
|
|
31,778,256 |
|
Elizabeth C. Ogie |
|
|
2,711,057,152 |
|
|
|
35,177,180 |
|
H. Lynn Page |
|
|
2,713,665,168 |
|
|
|
32,569,164 |
|
J. Neal Purcell |
|
|
2,718,125,486 |
|
|
|
28,108,846 |
|
Melvin T. Stith |
|
|
2,718,531,260 |
|
|
|
27,703,072 |
|
Philip W. Tomlinson |
|
|
2,708,529,248 |
|
|
|
37,705,084 |
|
William B. Turner, Jr. |
|
|
2,687,859,679 |
|
|
|
58,374,653 |
|
James D. Yancey |
|
|
2,708,817,099 |
|
|
|
37,417,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Alfred W. Jones, III resigned from Synovus board of directors effective July 7, 2008. |
Proposal II
The proposal was to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent auditor to audit the
consolidated financial statements of Synovus and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Votes |
|
|
2,717,676,955 |
|
|
|
23,926,119 |
|
|
|
4,631,257 |
|
|
59
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS
|
|
|
(a) Exhibits |
|
Description |
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of Synovus, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of
Synovus Quarterly Report on Form 10- Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC
on May 10, 2006 |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws, as amended, of Synovus, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Synovus Current
Report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 2008, filed with the SEC on July 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Change of Control Agreements for executive officers |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Synovus Financial Corp. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Synovus Financial Corp. Deferred
Compensation Plan |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report |
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
|
|
Date: August 08, 2008 |
BY: |
/s/ Thomas J. Prescott
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Prescott |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
61
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of Synovus, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of
Synovus Quarterly Report on Form 10- Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC
on May 10, 2006 |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws, as amended, of Synovus, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Synovus Current
Report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 2008, filed with the SEC on July 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Change of Control Agreements for executive officers |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Synovus Financial Corp. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Synovus Financial Corp. Deferred
Compensation Plan |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report |
62