UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Mark One
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE |
|
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 000-24939
EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
95-4703316 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
||
135 N. Los Robles Ave, 7th Floor, Pasadena, California 91101 |
||
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
||
|
||
(626) 768-6000 |
||
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filed, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
Number of shares outstanding of the issuers common stock on the latest practicable date: 61,240,103 shares of common stock as of October 31, 2006.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2
Certain matters discussed in this report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the 1933 Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and as such, may involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, expectations of the environment in which the Company operates and projections of future performance including future earnings and financial condition. The Companys actual results, performance, or achievements may differ significantly from the results, performance, or achievements expected or implied in such forward-looking statements. For a discussion of some of the factors that might cause such differences, see the Companys Form 10-K under the heading Item 1A. Risk Factors. The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation to update any forward looking statements to reflect the occurrence of events or circumstances after the date of such statements except as required by law.
3
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
172,357 |
|
$ |
151,192 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
99 |
|
|
|
||
Securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
100,000 |
|
50,000 |
|
||
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value (with amortized cost of $1,502,710 in 2006 and $873,969 in 2005) |
|
1,490,112 |
|
869,837 |
|
||
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $79,096 in 2006 and $68,635 in 2005 |
|
8,363,680 |
|
6,724,320 |
|
||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost |
|
75,647 |
|
45,707 |
|
||
Investment in Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost |
|
17,830 |
|
12,285 |
|
||
Other real estate owned, net |
|
2,884 |
|
299 |
|
||
Investment in affordable housing partnerships |
|
29,725 |
|
31,006 |
|
||
Premises and equipment, net |
|
43,647 |
|
38,579 |
|
||
Due from customers on acceptances |
|
10,886 |
|
6,074 |
|
||
Premiums on deposits acquired, net |
|
22,193 |
|
18,853 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
244,176 |
|
143,254 |
|
||
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies |
|
87,325 |
|
82,191 |
|
||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
113,635 |
|
82,073 |
|
||
Deferred tax assets |
|
38,106 |
|
22,586 |
|
||
TOTAL |
|
$ |
10,812,302 |
|
$ |
8,278,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Customer deposit accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
1,353,195 |
|
$ |
1,331,992 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
5,746,481 |
|
4,926,595 |
|
||
Total deposits |
|
7,099,676 |
|
6,258,587 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Federal funds purchased |
|
118,014 |
|
91,500 |
|
||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
1,499,879 |
|
617,682 |
|
||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
825,000 |
|
325,000 |
|
||
Notes payable |
|
6,460 |
|
8,833 |
|
||
Bank acceptances outstanding |
|
10,886 |
|
6,074 |
|
||
Accrued interest payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
86,994 |
|
83,347 |
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
184,023 |
|
153,095 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
9,830,932 |
|
7,544,118 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock
(par value of $0.001 per share) Authorized 200,000,000 shares |
|
66 |
|
61 |
|
||
Additional paid in capital |
|
539,168 |
|
389,004 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
489,197 |
|
393,846 |
|
||
Deferred compensation |
|
|
|
(8,242 |
) |
||
Treasury stock, at cost 4,937,699 shares in 2006 and 4,900,184 shares in 2005 |
|
(39,181 |
) |
(37,905 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
(7,880 |
) |
(2,626 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
981,370 |
|
734,138 |
|
||
TOTAL |
|
$ |
10,812,302 |
|
$ |
8,278,256 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loans receivable, including fees |
|
$ |
156,333 |
|
$ |
98,110 |
|
$ |
425,630 |
|
$ |
264,340 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
17,860 |
|
7,181 |
|
40,024 |
|
18,020 |
|
||||
Securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
1,917 |
|
224 |
|
5,160 |
|
224 |
|
||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
844 |
|
568 |
|
2,052 |
|
1,705 |
|
||||
Investment in Federal Reserve Bank stock |
|
262 |
|
126 |
|
664 |
|
346 |
|
||||
Short-term investments |
|
96 |
|
78 |
|
332 |
|
177 |
|
||||
Total interest and dividend income |
|
177,312 |
|
106,287 |
|
473,862 |
|
284,812 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Customer deposit accounts |
|
53,896 |
|
25,275 |
|
142,724 |
|
60,960 |
|
||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
16,081 |
|
6,290 |
|
32,988 |
|
19,361 |
|
||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
7,024 |
|
693 |
|
14,906 |
|
693 |
|
||||
Long-term debt |
|
3,432 |
|
1,810 |
|
9,346 |
|
4,295 |
|
||||
Federal funds purchased |
|
1,462 |
|
637 |
|
3,789 |
|
739 |
|
||||
Total interest expense |
|
81,895 |
|
34,705 |
|
203,753 |
|
86,048 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES |
|
95,417 |
|
71,582 |
|
270,109 |
|
198,764 |
|
||||
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES |
|
3,500 |
|
4,500 |
|
8,166 |
|
13,370 |
|
||||
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES |
|
91,917 |
|
67,082 |
|
261,943 |
|
185,394 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NONINTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Branch fees |
|
2,837 |
|
1,858 |
|
8,266 |
|
5,143 |
|
||||
Letters of credit fees and commissions |
|
2,065 |
|
2,029 |
|
6,396 |
|
6,533 |
|
||||
Ancillary loan fees |
|
925 |
|
645 |
|
2,835 |
|
1,774 |
|
||||
Net gain on
sales of investment securities |
|
676 |
|
1,786 |
|
2,537 |
|
3,519 |
|
||||
Income from life insurance policies |
|
973 |
|
873 |
|
2,785 |
|
2,436 |
|
||||
Income from secondary market activities |
|
123 |
|
130 |
|
496 |
|
1,314 |
|
||||
Net gain on sale of real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
||||
Other operating income |
|
504 |
|
506 |
|
1,673 |
|
1,572 |
|
||||
Total noninterest income |
|
8,103 |
|
7,827 |
|
25,076 |
|
22,291 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
18,589 |
|
12,979 |
|
50,589 |
|
38,318 |
|
||||
Occupancy and equipment expense |
|
5,610 |
|
3,736 |
|
15,726 |
|
10,426 |
|
||||
Deposit-related expenses |
|
2,365 |
|
2,326 |
|
7,020 |
|
6,088 |
|
||||
Amortization of premiums on deposits acquired |
|
1,691 |
|
782 |
|
5,308 |
|
1,988 |
|
||||
Amortization of investments in affordable housing partnerships |
|
1,555 |
|
1,581 |
|
4,281 |
|
4,971 |
|
||||
Data processing |
|
890 |
|
717 |
|
2,678 |
|
1,940 |
|
||||
Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments |
|
339 |
|
258 |
|
1,021 |
|
709 |
|
||||
Other operating expenses |
|
10,907 |
|
7,927 |
|
30,646 |
|
21,985 |
|
||||
Total noninterest expense |
|
41,946 |
|
30,306 |
|
117,269 |
|
86,425 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
58,074 |
|
44,603 |
|
169,750 |
|
121,260 |
|
||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
22,512 |
|
16,020 |
|
65,492 |
|
43,695 |
|
||||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
35,562 |
|
$ |
28,583 |
|
$ |
104,258 |
|
$ |
77,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
BASIC |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
BASIC |
|
60,536 |
|
53,261 |
|
59,204 |
|
52,615 |
|
||||
DILUTED |
|
61,797 |
|
54,822 |
|
60,569 |
|
54,222 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Common |
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Deferred |
|
Treasury |
|
Accumulated |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2005 |
|
$ |
57 |
|
$ |
260,152 |
|
$ |
296,175 |
|
$ |
(5,422 |
) |
$ |
(36,649 |
) |
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
$ |
514,309 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net income for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
77,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77,565 |
|
77,565 |
|
|||||||
Net unrealized loss on investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,206 |
) |
(3,206 |
) |
(3,206 |
) |
||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,359 |
|
|
|
|||||||
Stock compensation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
||||||||
Tax benefit from option exercises |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
||||||||
Issuance of 461,625 shares pursuant to various stock plans and agreements |
|
1 |
|
9,835 |
|
|
|
(4,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,686 |
|
||||||||
Issuance of 3,303 shares in lieu of Board of Director retainer fees |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
||||||||
Cancellation of 29,966 shares due to forfeitures of issued restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957 |
|
(957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Issuance of 3,138,701 shares pursuant to United National Bank acquisition |
|
3 |
|
106,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,716 |
|
||||||||
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(7,896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,896 |
) |
||||||||
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
61 |
|
$ |
378,309 |
|
$ |
365,844 |
|
$ |
(6,523 |
) |
$ |
(37,606 |
) |
$ |
(3,210 |
) |
|
|
$ |
696,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2006 |
|
$ |
61 |
|
$ |
389,004 |
|
$ |
393,846 |
|
$ |
(8,242 |
) |
$ |
(37,905 |
) |
$ |
(2,626 |
) |
|
|
$ |
734,138 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net income for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
104,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
104,258 |
|
104,258 |
|
|||||||
Net unrealized loss on
investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,254 |
) |
(5,254 |
) |
(5,254 |
) |
||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
99,004 |
|
|
|
|||||||
Elimination of deferred compensation pursuant to adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) |
|
|
|
(8,242 |
) |
|
|
8,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Stock compensation costs |
|
|
|
4,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,216 |
|
||||||||
Tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
9,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,896 |
|
||||||||
Tax benefit from vested restricted stock |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576 |
|
||||||||
Issuance of 907,320 shares pursuant to various stock plans and agreements |
|
1 |
|
8,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,442 |
|
||||||||
Issuance of 3,895 shares pursuant to Director retainer Fee |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
||||||||
Issuance of 3,647,440 shares pursuant to Standard Bank acquisition |
|
4 |
|
133,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,849 |
|
||||||||
Cancellation of 37,515 shares due to forfeitures of issued restricted stock |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(8,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,907 |
) |
||||||||
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
66 |
|
$ |
539,168 |
|
$ |
489,197 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(39,181 |
) |
$ |
(7,880 |
) |
|
|
$ |
981,370 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||
Disclosure of reclassification amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized holding loss on securities arising during the period, net of tax benefit of $2,739 in 2006 and $844 in 2005 |
|
$ |
(3,783 |
) |
$ |
(1,165 |
) |
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net income, net of tax expense of $1,066 in 2006 and $1,478 in 2005 |
|
(1,471 |
) |
(2,041 |
) |
||
Net unrealized loss on securities, net of tax benefit of $3,805 in 2006 and $2,322 in 2005 |
|
$ |
(5,254 |
) |
$ |
(3,206 |
) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
104,258 |
|
$ |
77,565 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
7,938 |
|
7,128 |
|
||
Stock compensation costs |
|
4,216 |
|
2,092 |
|
||
Deferred taxes |
|
(15,354 |
) |
(4,370 |
) |
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
8,166 |
|
13,370 |
|
||
Net gain on sales of investment securities, loans and other assets |
|
(2,837 |
) |
(4,588 |
) |
||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends |
|
(1,910 |
) |
(1,537 |
) |
||
Originations of loans held for sale |
|
(14,671 |
) |
(84,414 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale |
|
14,697 |
|
85,385 |
|
||
Tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
(9,896 |
) |
1,497 |
|
||
Tax benefit from vested restricted stock |
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
||
Net change in accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
(30,139 |
) |
3,269 |
|
||
Net change in accrued interest payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities |
|
13,883 |
|
8,381 |
|
||
Total adjustments |
|
(26,483 |
) |
26,213 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
77,775 |
|
103,778 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loan originations |
|
(1,498,479 |
) |
(935,658 |
) |
||
Purchases of: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Securities purchased under resale agreement |
|
(50,000 |
) |
(50,000 |
) |
||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
(1,321,846 |
) |
(284,896 |
) |
||
Loans receivable |
|
|
|
(1,988 |
) |
||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
(40,707 |
) |
(13,440 |
) |
||
Federal Reserve Bank stock |
|
(5,545 |
) |
(2,379 |
) |
||
Investments in affordable housing partnerships |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
||
Premises and equipment |
|
(6,485 |
) |
(3,774 |
) |
||
Proceeds from unsettled securities acquired |
|
225,616 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
232,371 |
|
225,875 |
|
||
Loans receivable |
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
||
Premises and equipment |
|
41 |
|
3 |
|
||
Other real estate owned |
|
387 |
|
|
|
||
Maturity of interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
960 |
|
100 |
|
||
Repayments, maturity and redemption of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
798,702 |
|
104,784 |
|
||
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
19,816 |
|
15,228 |
|
||
Cash obtained from acquisitions, net of cash paid |
|
98,351 |
|
49,077 |
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(1,541,748 |
) |
(897,080 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase in deposits |
|
112,095 |
|
742,542 |
|
||
Net increase in federal funds purchased |
|
26,514 |
|
182,000 |
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in Federal Home Loan Bank Advances |
|
812,000 |
|
(377,750 |
) |
||
Repayment of notes payable on affordable housing investments |
|
(5,373 |
) |
(1,823 |
) |
||
Payment of debt issue cost |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
||
Proceeds from securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
500,000 |
|
200,000 |
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
30,000 |
|
95,000 |
|
||
Proceeds from common stock options exercised |
|
5,539 |
|
1,903 |
|
||
Proceeds from stock warrants exercised |
|
1,600 |
|
1,600 |
|
||
Proceeds from Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
1,198 |
|
1,565 |
|
||
Tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
9,896 |
|
|
|
||
Tax benefit from vested restricted stock |
|
576 |
|
|
|
||
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
(8,907 |
) |
(7,896 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
1,485,138 |
|
837,061 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
21,165 |
|
43,759 |
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
151,192 |
|
93,075 |
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
172,357 |
|
$ |
136,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
200,335 |
|
$ |
81,350 |
|
Income tax payments, net of refunds |
|
71,188 |
|
40,157 |
|
||
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Guaranteed mortgage loan securitizations |
|
334,495 |
|
117,305 |
|
||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to acquisition |
|
133,849 |
|
106,716 |
|
||
Real estate investment financed through notes payable |
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
||
Real estate acquired through foreclosure |
|
2,884 |
|
|
|
||
Issuance of common stock to employees |
|
105 |
|
618 |
|
||
Issuance of common stock in lieu of Board of Director retainer fees |
|
156 |
|
112 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of East West Bancorp, Inc. (referred to herein on an unconsolidated basis as East West and on a consolidated basis as the Company) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, East West Bank and subsidiaries (the Bank) and East West Insurance Services, Inc. Intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. East West also has seven wholly-owned subsidiaries that are statutory business trusts (the Trusts). In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, the Trusts are not consolidated into the accounts of East West Bancorp, Inc.
The interim consolidated financial statements, presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), are unaudited and reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods. All adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Results for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the year as a whole. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Recent Accounting Standards
In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the AICPA issued Statement of Position No. 03-3 (SOP 03-3), Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer. SOP 03-3 addresses the accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and the cash flows expected to be collected from purchased loans or debt securities if those differences are attributable, in part, to credit quality. SOP 03-3 requires purchased loans and debt securities to be recorded initially at fair value based on the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected with no carryover of any valuation allowance previously recognized by the seller. Interest income should be recognized based on the effective yield from the cash flows expected to be collected. To the extent that the purchased loans or debt securities experience subsequent deterioration in credit quality, a valuation allowance would be established for any additional cash flows that are not expected to be received. However, if more cash flows subsequently are expected to be received than originally estimated, the effective yield would be adjusted on a prospective basis. SOP 03-3 is effective for loans and debt securities acquired by the Company after December 15, 2004. The adoption of this Statement on January 1, 2005 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This Statement supersedes Accounting
8
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance and is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. This Statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entitys equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions.
This Statement requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award - the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available). If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.
The Company adopted the revised accounting standards for stock based compensation effective January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123(R) allows for two alternative transition methods. The Company follows the modified prospective method, which requires application of the new Statement to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased or cancelled after the required effective date. Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding as of January 1, 2006 will be recognized as the requisite services are rendered on or after January 1, 2006. The compensation cost of that portion of awards is based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro forma disclosures under the original SFAS No. 123. Under the transition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company has reduced additional paid in capital by $8.2 million, representing the remaining deferred compensation balance in the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity as of January 1, 2006.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which addresses accounting for changes in accounting principle, changes in accounting estimates, changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions and error correction. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements of changes in accounting principle and error correction unless impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 states an exception to retrospective application when a change in accounting principle, or the method of applying it, may be inseparable from the effect of a change in accounting estimate. When a change in principle is inseparable from a change in estimate, such as depreciation, amortization or depletion, the change to the financial statements is to be presented in a prospective manner. SFAS No. 154 and the required disclosures are effective for accounting changes and error corrections in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) Nos. FAS 115-1 and 124-1 to address the determination as to when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss. This FSP nullified certain requirements of Emerging Issues Task Force 03-1 The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (EITF 03-1), and references existing other than temporary guidance. Furthermore, this FSP creates a three step process in determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. The FSP is effective for reporting periods beginning
9
after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
During December 2005, the FASB issued FSP Statement of Position (SOP) 94-6-1, Terms of Loan Products That May Give Rise to a Concentration of Credit Risk, which addresses the circumstances under which the terms of loan products give rise to such risk and the disclosures or other accounting considerations that apply for entities that originate, hold, guarantee, service, or invest in loan products with terms that may give rise to a concentration of credit risk. The guidance under this FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 19, 2005 and for loan products that are determined to represent a concentration of credit risk, disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, should be provided for all periods presented. The adoption of this FSP did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, which provides the following: 1) revised guidance on when a servicing asset and servicing liability should be recognized; 2) requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable; 3) permits an entity to elect to measure servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value each reporting date and report changes in fair value in earnings in the period in which the changes occur; 4) upon initial adoption, permits a onetime reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities for securities which are identified as offsetting the entitys exposure to changes in the fair value of servicing assets or liabilities that a servicer elects to subsequently measure at fair value; and 5) requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the statement of financial position and additional footnote disclosures. SFAS No. 156 is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006 with the effects of initial adoption being reported as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. It is not anticipated that adoption will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) which supplements SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by defining the confidence level that a tax position must meet in order to be recognized in the financial statements. The Interpretation requires that the tax effects of a position be recognized only if it is more-likely-than-not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The more-likely-than-not threshold represents a positive assertion by management that a company is entitled to economic benefits of a tax position. If a tax position is not considered more-likely-than-not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits, no benefits of the position are to be recognized. Moreover, the more-likely-than-not threshold must continue to be met in each reporting period to support continued recognition of a benefit. At adoption, companies must adjust their financial statements to reflect only those tax positions that are more-likely-than-not to be sustained as of the adoption date. Any necessary adjustment would be recorded directly to retained earnings in the period of adoption and reported as a change in accounting principle. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. It is not anticipated that adoption will have a material impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Quantifying Financial Misstatements, which expresses the Staffs views regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. Registrants are required to quantify the impact of correcting all misstatements, including both the carryover and reversing effects of prior year misstatements, on the current year financial statements. The techniques most commonly used in practice to accumulate and quantify misstatements are generally referred to as the rollover (current year income statement perspective) and iron curtain (year-end balance perspective) approaches. The financial statements would require adjustment when either approach results in quantifying a
10
misstatement that is material, after considering all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. Management does not expect this guidance to have a material effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which provides a single definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, expands required disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 12, 2007, and interim periods within those years. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 should be applied on a prospective basis. Management is assessing the potential impact of this guidance on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
3. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company issues stock options and restricted stock to employees under share-based compensation plans. As previously mentioned, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method. Under this method, the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) are applied to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased or canceled after December 31, 2005 and to awards outstanding on December 31, 2005 for which requisite service has not yet been rendered. SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to account for stock options using the fair value method, which generally results in compensation expense recognition. Prior to December 31, 2005, the Company accounted for its fixed stock options using the intrinsic-value method, as prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25. Accordingly, no stock option expense was recorded in periods prior to December 31, 2005.
The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) resulted in incremental stock-based compensation expense during 2006. Since we have previously recognized compensation expense on restricted stock awards, the incremental stock-based compensation expense recognized pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R) relates only to issued and unvested stock option grants. The incremental stock-based compensation expense caused income before income taxes to decrease by $399 thousand and net income to decrease by $232 thousand for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, incremental stock-based compensation expense reduced income before income taxes by $1.5 million and reduced net income by $853 thousand. This additional expense had no impact on basic and diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of 2006, but reduced both basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.01 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Cash provided by operating activities decreased by $10.5 million and cash provided by financing activities increased by an identical amount for the first nine months of 2006 related to excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company applied APB No. 25 to account for its stock based awards. The reported net income and earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 have been presented below to reflect the impact had the Company been required to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for stock options as required under SFAS No. 123(R). The pro forma amounts are as follows (amounts are reflected in thousands, except per share data):
11
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|||
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
28,583 |
|
$ |
77,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects |
|
418 |
|
1,214 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined using fair value method, net of related tax effects |
|
(1,051 |
) |
(2,411 |
) |
||
Net income, pro forma |
|
$ |
27,950 |
|
$ |
76,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
||
As reported |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, total compensation cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income related to stock options and restricted stock awards amounted to $1.5 million and $4.2 million, respectively, with their related tax benefits of $632 thousand and $1.8 million, respectively.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, total compensation cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income related to restricted stock awards amounted to $721 thousand and $2.1 million, respectively, with their related tax benefits of $303 thousand and $879 thousand, respectively.
Stock Options
The Company issues fixed stock options to certain employees, officers, and directors. Stock options are issued at the current market price on the date of grant with a three-year or four-year vesting period and contractual terms of 7 or 10 years.
A summary of activity for the Companys stock options as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is presented below:
12
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
3,209,183 |
|
$ |
13.51 |
|
|
|
||
Granted |
|
246,307 |
|
37.39 |
|
|
|
|||
Exercised |
|
(750,343 |
) |
7.38 |
|
|
|
|||
Forfeited |
|
(14,725 |
) |
26.78 |
|
|
|
|||
Outstanding at end of period |
|
2,690,422 |
|
$ |
17.33 |
|
$ |
46,627 |
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2006 |
|
2,159,175 |
|
|
|
$ |
28,631 |
|
||
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period |
|
$ |
10.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $10.12 and $9.32, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Expected life (1) |
|
4 years |
|
3.5 years |
|
4 years |
|
3.5 years |
|
Expected volatility (2) |
|
26.5 |
% |
28.3 |
% |
27.7 |
% |
28.1 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
0.5 |
% |
0.6 |
% |
0.6 |
% |
0.5 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate (3) |
|
4.6 |
% |
4.1 |
% |
4.7 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
(1) The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees.
(2) The expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the stock options expected life.
(3) The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2006:
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
||
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
||
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercisable |
|
Exercise |
|
||
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Life |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
||
$5.00 to $9.99 |
|
499,069 |
|
$ |
5.64 |
|
2.2 years |
|
499,069 |
|
$ |
5.64 |
|
$10.00 to $14.99 |
|
656,725 |
|
12.60 |
|
5.0 years |
|
656,725 |
|
12.60 |
|
||
$15.00 to $19.99 |
|
997,806 |
|
16.88 |
|
3.0 years |
|
946,856 |
|
16.89 |
|
||
$25.00 to $29.99 |
|
114,475 |
|
26.61 |
|
4.4 years |
|
51,025 |
|
26.63 |
|
||
$30.00 to $34.99 |
|
51,228 |
|
33.94 |
|
5.9 years |
|
4,000 |
|
33.62 |
|
||
$35.00 to $39.99 |
|
352,374 |
|
37.32 |
|
6.1 years |
|
1,250 |
|
35.14 |
|
||
$40.00 to $44.99 |
|
18,745 |
|
40.48 |
|
6.8 years |
|
250 |
|
42.97 |
|
||
$5.00 to $44.99 |
|
2,690,422 |
|
$ |
17.33 |
|
3.89 years |
|
2,159,175 |
|
$ |
13.26 |
|
13
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, activities related to stock options are presented as follows:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total intrinsic value of options exercised |
|
$ |
7,025 |
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
$ |
23,542 |
|
$ |
3,565 |
|
Total fair value of options vested |
|
$ |
935 |
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
$ |
1,806 |
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
As of September 30, 2006, total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options amounted to $3.6 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.5 years.
Restricted Stock
In addition to stock options, the Company also grants restricted stock awards to directors, certain officers and employees. The restricted shares awarded become fully vested after three to five years of continued employment from the date of grant. The Company becomes entitled to an income tax deduction in an amount equal to the taxable income reported by the holders of the restricted shares when the restrictions are released and the shares are issued. Restricted shares are forfeited if officers and employees terminate prior to the lapsing of restrictions. The Company records forfeitures of restricted stock as treasury share repurchases.
A summary of the activity for restricted stock as of September 30, 2006, including changes during the nine months then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
431,392 |
|
$ |
30.60 |
|
Granted |
|
166,106 |
|
36.77 |
|
|
Vested |
|
(71,570 |
) |
18.24 |
|
|
Forfeited |
|
(37,515 |
) |
33.72 |
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
488,413 |
|
$ |
34.26 |
|
In March 2006, the Company also granted performance restricted stock with two-year cliff vesting to an executive officer. The number of shares that the executive will receive under this stock award will ultimately depend on the Companys achievement of specified performance targets. The performance period is January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2007. At the end of the performance period, the number of stock awards issued will be determined by adjusting upward or downward from the target amount of shares in a range between 24% and 124%. The final performance percentage on which the payout will be based, considering performance metrics established for the performance period, will be determined by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board. If the Company performs below its performance targets, the Board or the committee may, at its discretion, choose not to award any shares. Shares of stock, if any, will be issued following the end of the performance period two years from the date of grant. Compensation costs are accrued over the service period
14
and are based on the probable outcome of the performance condition. The maximum number of shares subject to this grant cannot exceed 41,000 shares.
As of September 30, 2006, total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards amounted to $10.3 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.2 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company adopted the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Purchase Plan) providing eligible employees of the Company and its subsidiaries participation in the ownership of the Company through the right to purchase shares of its common stock at a discount. Under the terms of the Purchase Plan, prior to April 2005, employees could purchase shares of the Companys common stock at the lesser of 85% of the per-share market price at the date of grant or exercise, subject to an annual limitation of common stock valued at $25,000. In April 2005, the terms of the Purchase Plan were amended to allow the employees to purchase shares at 90% of the per-share market price at the date of exercise, maintaining the annual common stock value limitation of $25,000. As of September 30, 2006, the Purchase Plan qualifies as a non-compensatory plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and, accordingly, no compensation expense is recognized under the plan.
The Purchase Plan covers a total of 2,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, 34,319 shares totaling $1.2 million were sold to employees under the Purchase Plan.
4. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
The Company has completed several business acquisitions that have all been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly all assets and liabilities were adjusted to and recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired, if identifiable, was recorded as a premium on purchased deposits, and if not identifiable, was recorded as goodwill. The estimated tax effect of differences between tax bases and market values has been reflected in deferred income taxes. The results of operations of the acquired entities have been included in the Companys consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
At the close of business on March 17, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of Standard Bank, a federal savings bank headquartered in Monterey Park, California. The purchase price was $200.3 million which was comprised of $66.4 million in cash and 3,647,440 shares of East West Bancorp, Inc. common stock. The Company recorded total goodwill of $100.8 million and core deposit premium of $8.6 million for this transaction.
The Company completed the acquisition of United National Bank, a commercial bank headquatered in San Marino, California, at the close of business on September 6, 2005. The purchase price was $177.9 million which was comprised of $71.1 million in cash and 3,138,701 shares of East West Bancorp, Inc. common stock. The Company recorded total goodwill of $99.6 million and core deposit premium of $15.0 million for this transaction.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition for these two transactions:
15
|
Standard |
|
United National |
|
|||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
165,834 |
|
$ |
120,221 |
|
Loans receivable |
|
487,110 |
|
666,693 |
|
||
Premises and equipment |
|
3,211 |
|
10,434 |
|
||
Core deposit premium |
|
8,648 |
|
15,044 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
100,838 |
|
99,635 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
239,585 |
|
146,966 |
|
||
Total assets acquired |
|
1,005,226 |
|
1,058,993 |
|
||
Deposits |
|
728,994 |
|
865,070 |
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
75,960 |
|
16,063 |
|
||
Total liabilities assumed |
|
804,954 |
|
881,133 |
|
||
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
200,272 |
|
$ |
177,860 |
|
The unaudited pro forma combined amounts presented below give effect to the acquisition of Standard Bank as if this transaction had been completed as of the beginning of each period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the unaudited pro forma combined amounts also include the results of operations for United National Bank as if this transaction had been completed as of the beginning of each period. The unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have resulted had the acquisitions been completed at the beginning of the applicable period presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results of operations in future periods.
16
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 (1) |
|
2005 (3) |
|
2006 (2) |
|
2005 (3) |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
||||||||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
95,417 |
|
$ |
84,314 |
|
$ |
274,213 |
|
$ |
241,796 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
(3,500 |
) |
(8,450 |
) |
(9,366 |
) |
(17,780 |
) |
||||
Noninterest income |
|
8,103 |
|
8,430 |
|
14,868 |
|
24,760 |
|
||||
Noninterest expense |
|
(41,946 |
) |
(37,385 |
) |
(119,497 |
) |
(107,572 |
) |
||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
58,074 |
|
46,909 |
|
160,218 |
|
141,204 |
|
||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
(22,512 |
) |
(17,331 |
) |
(61,484 |
) |
(52,189 |
) |
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
35,562 |
|
$ |
29,578 |
|
$ |
98,734 |
|
$ |
89,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
BASIC |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
BASIC |
|
60,536 |
|
59,228 |
|
60,219 |
|
59,125 |
|
||||
DILUTED |
|
61,797 |
|
60,789 |
|
61,584 |
|
60,732 |
|
(1) Since the acquisition of Standard Bank was completed on March 17, 2006, there is no difference between the pro forma and actual results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2006.
(2) The pro forma results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 includes $10.3 million in net realized losses on investment securities that were sold by Standard Bank during the first quarter of 2006. Further, the pro forma results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 reflect interest expense related to junior subordinated debt amounting to $30.0 million that was issued in connection with the acquisition of Standard Bank as if this debt instrument was issued at the beginning of the period.
(3) The pro forma results of operations for both periods in 2005 reflect additional interest expense related to $50.0 million in junior subordinated debt that was issued in connection with the acquisitions of United National Bank and Standard Bank as if these debt instruments were issued at the beginning of each period.
5. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
During 2006, the Company has entered into three separate long-term transactions totaling $500.0 million involving the sale of securities under repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and recorded at the amounts at which the securities were sold. The collateral for these agreements consist of U.S. Government agency and U.S. Government sponsored enterprise debt and mortgage-backed securities.
The first transaction, amounting to $200.0 million, has an effective date of April 25, 2006 and a maturity date of April 25, 2016. The interest rate is initially floating for the first two years from April 25, 2006 through April 25, 2008 based on the three-month Libor minus 125 basis points. Thereafter, the rate is fixed at 5.128% for the remainder of the term. As of September 30, 2006, the interest rate on this agreement is 4.235%. The counterparty has the right to call the transaction on April 25, 2008 and quarterly thereafter until maturity.
17
The second transaction, also amounting to $200.0 million, has an effective date of June 6, 2006 and a maturity date of June 6, 2013. The interest rate is initially floating for the first six months from June 6, 2006 through December 6, 2006 based on the three-month Libor minus 255 basis points. Thereafter, the rate is fixed at 5.00% for the remainder of the term. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate on this agreement is 2.84%. The counterparty has the right to call the transaction on December 6, 2006 and quarterly thereafter until maturity.
The third transaction, amounting to $100.0 million, has an effective date of September 7, 2006 and a maturity date of September 7, 2016. The interest rate is initially floating for the first nine months from September 7, 2006 through June 7, 2007 based on the three-month Libor minus 340 basis points. Thereafter, the rate is fixed at 4.7775% for the remainder of the term. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate on this agreement is 1.99%. The counterparty has the right to call the transaction on June 7, 2007 and quarterly thereafter until maturity.
In June 2006, the Company modified the terms of $50.0 million of its repurchase agreements in response to the increasing interest rate environment. This transaction was initially entered into by the Company in September 2005. Under the original terms of this seven-year agreement, the interest rate for the first year was based on the three-month Libor minus 100 basis points. Thereafter, the rate was fixed at 4.075% through the original maturity date of September 6, 2012. Under the modified terms, the interest rate on this agreement for the period from June 6, 2006 through December 6, 2006 is based on the three-month Libor minus 290 basis points. Thereafter, the rate is fixed at 5.00% through the extended maturity date of June 6, 2013. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate on this repurchase agreement is 2.49%. Under the terms of the modification, the counterparty has the right to call the transaction on December 6, 2006 and quarterly thereafter until maturity. The difference in the present value of the cash flows under the new terms of the debt instrument is less than 10% of the present value of the remaining cash flows under the original terms. As such, this modification of debt terms is not considered substantial, and therefore, does not constitute extinguishment of debt in accordance with the provisions of EITF 96-19, Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments. No gain or loss was recorded in the consolidated statements of income as a result of this debt modification.
6. JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT
On March 15, 2006, the Company issued $30.9 million in junior subordinated debt securities through a pooled trust preferred offering. Similar to previous offerings, these securities were issued through a newly formed statutory business trust, East West Capital Trust VII (Trust VII), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The proceeds from the debt securities are loaned by Trust VII to the Company and are included in long-term debt in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The securities issued by Trust VII have a scheduled maturity of June 15, 2036 and bear interest at a per annum rate based on the three-month Libor plus 135 basis points, payable on a quarterly basis. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate on the junior subordinated debt was 6.74%. The junior subordinated debt issued qualifies as Tier I capital for regulatory reporting purposes.
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Credit Extensions - In the normal course of business, the Company has various outstanding commitments to extend credit that are not reflected in the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements. As of September 30, 2006, undisbursed loan commitments and commercial and standby letters of credit amounted to $2.25 billion and $449.0 million, respectively.
18
Guarantees From time to time, the Company sells loans with recourse in the ordinary course of business. For loans that have been sold with recourse, the recourse component is considered a guarantee. When the Company sells a loan with recourse, it commits to stand ready to perform if the loan defaults, and to make payments to remedy the default. As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, loans sold with recourse, comprised entirely of residential single family mortgage loans, totaled $27.9 million and $31.6 million, respectively. The Companys recourse reserve related to these loans totaled $61 thousand and $76 thousand as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company also sells loans without recourse that may have to be subsequently repurchased if a defect that occurred during the loan origination process results in a violation of a representation or warranty made in connection with the sale of the loan. When a loan sold to an investor without recourse fails to perform according to its contractual terms, the investor will typically review the loan file to determine whether defects in the origination process occurred and if such defects give rise to a violation of a representation or warranty made to the investor in connection with the sale. If such a defect is identified, the Company may be required to either repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor for losses sustained. If there are no such defects, the Company has no commitment to repurchase the loan. As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the amount of loans sold without recourse totaled $1.05 billion and $777.6 million, which substantially represents the unpaid principal balance of the Companys loans serviced for others portfolio.
Litigation - Neither the Company nor the Bank is involved in any material legal proceedings at September 30, 2006. The Bank, from time to time, is a party to litigation which arises in the ordinary course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the origination and servicing of loans, and other issues related to the business of the Bank. After taking into consideration information furnished by counsel to the Company and the Bank, management believes that the resolution of such issues will not have a material adverse impact on the financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Company or the Bank.
Regulated Investment Company On December 31, 2003, the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) announced that it is taking the position that certain tax deductions relating to regulated investment companies will be disallowed pursuant to California Senate Bill 614 and California Assembly Bill 1601, which were signed into law in the fourth quarter of 2003. East West Securities Company, Inc. (the Fund), a regulated investment company (RIC) formed and funded in July 2000 to raise capital in an efficient and economical manner was dissolved on December 30, 2002 as a result of, among other reasons, proposed legislation to change the tax treatments of RICs. The Fund provided state tax benefits beginning in 2000 until the end of 2002, when the RIC was officially dissolved. While the Companys management continues to believe that the tax benefits realized in previous years were appropriate and fully defensible under the existing tax codes at that time, the Company has deemed it prudent to participate in the voluntary compliance initiative, or VCI offered by the State of California to avoid certain potential penalties should the FTB choose to litigate its announced position about the tax treatment of RICs for periods prior to enactment of the legislation described above and should the FTB be successful in that litigation.
Pursuant to the VCI program, the Company filed amended California income tax returns on April 15, 2004 for all affected years and paid the resulting taxes and interest due to the FTB. This amounted to an aggregate payment of $14.2 million for tax years 2000, 2001, and 2002. The Companys management continues to believe that the tax deductions are appropriate and, as such, refund claims have also been filed for the amounts paid with the amended returns. These refund claims are reflected as assets in the Companys consolidated financial statements. As a result of these actionsamending the Companys California income tax returns and subsequent related filing of refund claimsthe Company retains its potential exposure for assertion of an accuracy-related penalty should the FTB prevail in its position, in addition to our risk of not being
19
successful in our refund claim for taxes and interest. The Companys potential exposure to all other penalties, however, has been eliminated through this course of action.
The FTB is currently in the process of reviewing and assessing our refund claims for taxes and interest for tax years 2000 through 2002. Management is continuing to pursue these claims, to monitor developments in the law in this area, and to monitor the status of tax claims with respect to other registered investment companies.
8. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Earnings Per Share - The actual number of shares outstanding at September 30, 2006 was 61,206,684. Basic earnings per share are calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period plus restricted stock and shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of outstanding common stock options and warrants.
The following table sets forth earnings per share calculations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Net |
|
Number |
|
Per Share |
|
Net |
|
Number |
|
Per Share |
|
||||
|
|
Income |
|
of Shares |
|
Amounts |
|
Income |
|
of Shares |
|
Amounts |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
35,562 |
|
60,536 |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
$ |
28,583 |
|
53,261 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stock options |
|
|
|
995 |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
1,312 |
|
(0.02 |
) |
||||
Restricted stock |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
||||
Stock warrants |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
||||
Dilutive earnings per share |
|
$ |
35,562 |
|
61,797 |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
$ |
28,583 |
|
54,822 |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Net |
|
Number |
|
Per Share |
|
Net |
|
Number |
|
Per Share |
|
||||
|
|
Income |
|
of Shares |
|
Amounts |
|
Income |
|
of Shares |
|
Amounts |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
104,258 |
|
59,204 |
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
$ |
77,565 |
|
52,615 |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stock options |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
1,346 |
|
(0.04 |
) |
||||
Restricted stock |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
||||
Stock warrants |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
||||
Dilutive earnings per share |
|
$ |
104,258 |
|
60,569 |
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
$ |
77,565 |
|
54,222 |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
Quarterly Dividends The Companys Board of Directors declared and paid quarterly common stock cash dividends of $0.05 per share which was paid on August 23, 2006 to shareholders of record on August 9, 2006. Cash dividends totaling $3.0 million were paid to the Companys shareholders during the third quarter of 2006.
20
9. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The Company utilizes an internal reporting system to measure the performance of various operating segments within the Bank and the Company overall. The Company has identified four principal operating segments for purposes of management reporting: retail banking, commercial lending, treasury, and residential lending. Information related to the Companys remaining centralized functions and eliminations of inter-segment amounts have been aggregated and included in Other. Although all four operating segments offer financial products and services, they are managed separately based on each segments strategic focus. While the retail banking segment focuses primarily on retail operations through the Banks branch network, certain designated branches have responsibility for generating commercial deposits and loans. The commercial lending segment, which includes commercial real estate, primarily generates commercial loans and deposits through the efforts of commercial lending officers located in the Banks northern and southern California production offices. The treasury departments primary focus is managing the Banks investments, liquidity, and interest rate risk; the residential lending segment is mainly responsible for the Banks portfolio of single family and multifamily residential loans.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies described in Note 1 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Operating segment results are based on the Companys internal management reporting process, which reflects assignments and allocations of capital, certain operating and administrative costs and the provision for loan losses. Net interest income is based on the Companys internal funds transfer pricing system which assigns a cost of funds or a credit for funds to assets or liabilities based on their type, maturity or re-pricing characteristics. Noninterest income and noninterest expense, including depreciation and amortization, directly attributable to a segment are assigned to that business. Indirect costs, including overhead expense, are allocated to the segments based on several factors, including, but not limited to, full-time equivalent employees, loan volume and deposit volume. The provision for credit losses is allocated based on actual losses incurred and an allocation of the remaining provision based on new loan originations for the period. The Company evaluates overall performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes not including nonrecurring gains and losses.
Future changes in the Companys management structure or reporting methodologies may result in changes in the measurement of operating segment results. Results for prior periods have been restated for comparability for changes in management structure or reporting methodologies. Specifically, an adjustment was made to reallocate the credit provided for the Companys capital to the treasury segment from the Other category. The adjustment resulted in an increase in the treasury segments pretax profit of $6.6 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, this adjustment resulted in an increase in the treasury segments pretax profit of $18.7 million and $11.7 million, respectively.
The following tables present the operating results and other key financial measures for the individual operating segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:
21
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Retail |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Banking |
|
Lending |
|
Treasury |
|
Lending |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest income |
|
$ |
61,692 |
|
$ |
73,564 |
|
$ |
20,980 |
|
$ |
19,462 |
|
$ |
1,614 |
|
$ |
177,312 |
|
Charge for funds used |
|
(44,467 |
) |
(51,125 |
) |
(21,974 |
) |
(15,868 |
) |
|
|
(133,434 |
) |
||||||
Interest spread on funds used |
|
17,225 |
|
22,439 |
|
(994 |
) |
3,594 |
|
1,614 |
|
43,878 |
|
||||||
Interest expense |
|
(37,779 |
) |
(5,837 |
) |
(35,412 |
) |
|
|
(2,867 |
) |
(81,895 |
) |
||||||
Credit on funds provided |
|
72,083 |
|
10,699 |
|
50,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
133,434 |
|
||||||
Interest spread on funds provided |
|
34,304 |
|
4,862 |
|
15,240 |
|
|
|
(2,867 |
) |
51,539 |
|
||||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
51,529 |
|
$ |
27,301 |
|
$ |
14,246 |
|
$ |
3,594 |
|
$ |
(1,253 |
) |
$ |
95,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
2,596 |
|
$ |
174 |
|
$ |
(1,228 |
) |
$ |
(76 |
) |
$ |
752 |
|
$ |
2,218 |
|
Goodwill |
|
182,488 |
|
12,166 |
|
|
|
48,663 |
|
859 |
|
244,176 |
|
||||||
Segment pretax profit (loss) |
|
28,997 |
|
22,232 |
|
11,484 |
|
1,806 |
|
(6,445 |
) |
58,074 |
|
||||||
Segment assets |
|
2,468,924 |
|
3,421,399 |
|
1,611,488 |
|
2,609,012 |
|
701,479 |
|
10,812,302 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Retail |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Banking |
|
Lending |
|
Treasury |
|
Lending |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest income |
|
$ |
35,116 |
|
$ |
47,619 |
|
$ |
8,176 |
|
$ |
14,153 |
|
$ |
1,223 |
|
$ |
106,287 |
|
Charge for funds used |
|
(20,913 |
) |
(27,429 |
) |
(8,648 |
) |
(9,012 |
) |
|
|
(66,002 |
) |
||||||
Interest spread on funds used |
|
14,203 |
|
20,190 |
|
(472 |
) |
5,141 |
|
1,223 |
|
40,285 |
|
||||||
Interest expense |
|
(16,498 |
) |
(2,366 |
) |
(15,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(34,705 |
) |
||||||
Credit on funds provided |
|
38,556 |
|
5,482 |
|
21,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
66,002 |
|
||||||
Interest spread on funds provided |
|
22,058 |
|
3,116 |
|
6,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
31,297 |
|
||||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
36,261 |
|
$ |
23,306 |
|
$ |
5,651 |
|
$ |
5,141 |
|
$ |
1,223 |
|
$ |
71,582 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
1,457 |
|
$ |
119 |
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
$ |
239 |
|
$ |
967 |
|
$ |
2,324 |
|
Goodwill |
|
107,649 |
|
7,177 |
|
|
|
28,706 |
|
958 |
|
144,490 |
|
||||||
Segment pretax profit (loss) |
|
16,729 |
|
19,699 |
|
6,956 |
|
3,076 |
|
(1,857 |
) |
44,603 |
|
||||||
Segment assets |
|
1,711,258 |
|
2,401,139 |
|
833,954 |
|
2,555,291 |
|
436,736 |
|
7,938,378 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Retail |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Banking |
|
Lending |
|
Treasury |
|
Lending |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest income |
|
$ |
163,789 |
|
$ |
199,322 |
|
$ |
48,232 |
|
$ |
53,408 |
|
$ |
9,111 |
|
$ |
473,862 |
|
Charge for funds used |
|
(113,496 |
) |
(133,732 |
) |
(57,208 |
) |
(42,454 |
) |
|
|
(346,890 |
) |
||||||
Interest spread on funds used |
|
50,293 |
|
65,590 |
|
(8,976 |
) |
10,954 |
|
9,111 |
|
126,972 |
|
||||||
Interest expense |
|
(97,155 |
) |
(14,425 |
) |
(89,305 |
) |
|
|
(2,868 |
) |
(203,753 |
) |
||||||
Credit on funds provided |
|
193,600 |
|
28,585 |
|
124,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
346,890 |
|
||||||
Interest spread on funds provided |
|
96,445 |
|
14,160 |
|
35,400 |
|
|
|
(2,868 |
) |
143,137 |
|
||||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
146,738 |
|
$ |
79,750 |
|
$ |
26,424 |
|
$ |
10,954 |
|
$ |
6,243 |
|
$ |
270,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
7,940 |
|
$ |
524 |
|
$ |
(2,309 |
) |
$ |
544 |
|
$ |
1,239 |
|
$ |
7,938 |
|
Goodwill |
|
182,488 |
|
12,166 |
|
|
|
48,663 |
|
859 |
|
244,176 |
|
||||||
Segment pretax profit (loss) |
|
86,436 |
|
67,969 |
|
27,333 |
|
6,701 |
|
(18,689 |
) |
169,750 |
|
||||||
Segment assets |
|
2,468,924 |
|
3,421,399 |
|
1,611,488 |
|
2,609,012 |
|
701,479 |
|
10,812,302 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Retail |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Banking |
|
Lending |
|
Treasury |
|
Lending |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest income |
|
$ |
92,461 |
|
$ |
129,715 |
|
$ |
20,416 |
|
$ |
39,041 |
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
$ |
284,812 |
|
Charge for funds used |
|
(51,869 |
) |
(70,539 |
) |
(16,716 |
) |
(23,574 |
) |
|
|
(162,698 |
) |
||||||
Interest spread on funds used |
|
40,592 |
|
59,176 |
|
3,700 |
|
15,467 |
|
3,179 |
|
122,114 |
|
||||||
Interest expense |
|
(39,896 |
) |
(5,507 |
) |
(40,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(86,048 |
) |
||||||
Credit on funds provided |
|
92,934 |
|
12,807 |
|
56,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
162,698 |
|
||||||
Interest spread on funds provided |
|
53,038 |
|
7,300 |
|
16,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
76,650 |
|
||||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
93,630 |
|
$ |
66,476 |
|
$ |
20,012 |
|
$ |
15,467 |
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
$ |
198,764 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
3,858 |
|
$ |
344 |
|
$ |
(783 |
) |
$ |
720 |
|
$ |
2,989 |
|
$ |
7,128 |
|
Goodwill |
|
107,649 |
|
7,177 |
|
|
|
28,706 |
|
958 |
|
144,490 |
|
||||||
Segment pretax profit (loss) |
|
42,688 |
|
55,851 |
|
22,092 |
|
12,155 |
|
(11,526 |
) |
121,260 |
|
||||||
Segment assets |
|
1,711,258 |
|
2,401,139 |
|
833,954 |
|
2,555,291 |
|
436,736 |
|
7,938,378 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion provides information about the results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, and capital resources of East West Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries. This information is intended to facilitate the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our financial condition and the results of our operations. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our 2005 annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and the accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We believe that the judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are appropriate given the factual circumstances as of September 30, 2006.
Various elements of our accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. In particular, we have identified three accounting policies that, due to judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies, are critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements. These policies relate to the classification and valuation of investment securities, the methodologies that determine our allowance for loan losses, and the valuation of retained interests and mortgage servicing assets related to securitizations and sales of loans. In each area, we have identified the variables most important in the estimation process. We have used the best information available to make the estimations necessary to value the related assets and liabilities. Actual performance that differs from our estimates and future changes in the key variables could change future valuations and impact net income.
Our significant accounting policies are described in greater detail in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K in the Critical Accounting Policies section of Managements Discussion and Analysis and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial StatementsSignificant Accounting Policies which are essential to understanding Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
Overview
During the third quarter of 2006, we generated strong earnings totaling $35.6 million, or $0.59 per basic share and $0.58 per diluted share, compared with $28.6 million, or $0.54 per basic share and $0.52 per diluted share, reported during the third quarter of 2005. Loan growth, operating efficiencies and solid asset quality contributed to our earnings performance for the third quarter of 2006. The annualized return on average assets during the third quarter of 2006 was 1.38%, compared with 1.62% for the same quarter in 2005. The annualized return on average equity was 14.94% during the third quarter of 2006, compared to 19.15% during the same period in 2005. The decrease in the annualized return on average equity is primarily due to additional shares issued in connection with the acquisition of Standard Bank. Based on the results of our performance in the third quarter of 2006 and expected growth for the remainder of 2006, we expect net income per diluted common share for the full year 2006 to be approximately 17% higher than in 2005. This estimate is based on a projected annualized loan growth of 15% to 17% for the fourth quarter of 2006, annualized deposit growth of 8% to 10% for the fourth quarter of 2006, and a marginal increase in operating expenses for the fourth quarter of 2006. Our
23
earnings projection for the full year of 2006 also assumes a stable or marginally increasing interest rate environment and a net interest margin between 3.80% and 3.90%.
During the third quarter of 2006, we received approval from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) to open a branch in Hong Kong. This branch will be the Banks first overseas full-service branch office offering a variety of deposit, loan, and international banking products. The Hong Kong branch will commence business during the early part of 2007. In addition to the Hong Kong branch, the Bank also has a representative office in Beijing, China which was opened in January 2003. With the anticipated opening of our Hong Kong branch, we expect to strengthen and solidify our presence in the greater China banking arena in the coming months and years.
Also during the third quarter of 2006, we entered into another long-term transaction involving the sale of securities under repurchase agreements amounting to $100.0 million with a ten-year term. This agreement is non-callable for the first nine months with an interest rate based on the three-month Libor minus 340 basis points for the first nine months. Thereafter, the interest rate is fixed at 4.7775% for the remainder of the term. The counterparty to this agreement has the right to a quarterly call when the interest rate changes from floating to fixed.
Total consolidated assets at September 30, 2006 increased 31% to $10.81 billion, compared with $8.28 billion at December 31, 2005. A 24% growth in gross loans was the primary driver of this increase, rising to a record $8.45 billion at September 30, 2006. Excluding the impact of the Standard Bank acquisition and loan securitization transactions, organic loan growth was $1.49 billion or 22% year to date. The loan portfolio continues to grow steadily and we estimate loan growth for the full year of 2006 to range from 20% to 25%, reflecting the core rate of growth in the Banks lending markets, the addition of new client relationships, and the utilization of additional lending programs and products.
Total average assets increased 46% to $10.32 billion during the third quarter of 2006, compared to $7.08 billion for the same quarter in 2005, primarily due to growth in average loans. Total average loans grew to $8.17 billion during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, an increase of 38% over the corresponding period in the prior year. The growth in average loans for the third quarter of 2006 was driven by double digit increases in all loan sectors, except for consumer loans. Total average deposits rose 30% during the third quarter of 2006 to $6.92 billion, compared to $5.31 billion for the same quarter in 2005. Except for non-interest bearing demand deposits, we experienced double-digit growth in all average deposit categories during the third quarter of 2006, with the largest dollar impact coming from money market accounts and time deposits.
Net interest income increased 33% to $95.4 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, compared with $71.6 million during the same quarter in 2005. The substantial increase in net interest income is predominantly due to significant loan growth and steady increases in interest rates by the Federal Reserve during the past year. These factors were partially offset by increases in both the volume and rates paid for time deposits and money market accounts, as well as growth in the volume of FHLB advances and securities sold under resale agreements and higher rates paid on FHLB advances. Our net interest margin decreased 33 basis points to 3.89% during the third quarter of 2006, compared to 4.22% during the same period in 2005. Our margin was negatively impacted by continued competition in loan and deposit pricing. Assuming a stable or marginally increasing interest rate environment during 2006, we anticipate the net interest margin for the fourth quarter of 2006 to be in the range of 3.80% to 3.90%.
Total noninterest income increased slightly to $8.1 million during the third quarter of 2006, compared with $7.8 million for the corresponding quarter in 2005. This increase is primarily comprised of higher branch-related fee income and other operating income, partially offset by a decrease in net gains on sales of available-for-sale
24
securities. For the full year of 2006, we anticipate our core noninterest income to be moderately higher than that of the prior year.
As a result of our continued expansion, total noninterest expense increased 38% to $41.9 million during the third quarter of 2006, compared with $30.3 million for the same period in 2005. This increase was largely due to increased staffing levels and an overall increase in operating costs due to the acquisitions of United National Bank in the third quarter of 2005 and Standard Bank in the first quarter of 2006. Occupancy expense also increased due to the recent relocation and expansion of our corporate offices. Our efficiency ratio, which represents noninterest expense (excluding the amortization of intangibles and investments in affordable housing partnerships), divided by the aggregate of net interest income before provision for loan losses and noninterest income increased to 37% during the third quarter of 2006 compared to 35% during the same period in 2005. Due to the acquisitions of United National Bank and Standard Bank and the overall growth of the Bank, as well as the recent relocation of our corporate headquarters, we anticipate noninterest expenses to increase by 35% to 38% for the full year of 2006, but expect our efficiency ratio to remain at approximately 37%.
Total nonperforming assets amounted to $13.5 million, or 0.12% of total assets at September 30, 2006, compared with $30.1 million, or 0.36% of total assets, at December 31, 2005. The allowance for loan losses totaled $79.1 million at September 30, 2006, or 0.94% of outstanding total loans. Net chargeoffs totaled $132 thousand during the third quarter of 2006, representing an annualized 0.01% of average loans, for the quarter. This compares with $1.1 million in net chargeoffs, or an annualized 0.08% of average loans, during the same quarter in 2005. We anticipate our overall asset quality to remain sound throughout the remainder of 2006.
We continue to be well-capitalized under all regulatory guidelines with a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 9.18%, a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.97%, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8.22% at September 30, 2006. As previously mentioned, we raised $30.0 million in additional regulatory capital through the issuance of trust preferred securities in a trust preferred offering during the first quarter of 2006. Trust preferred securities currently qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes. The net proceeds from the trust preferred offering were used to partially fund the acquisition of Standard Bank and also to support the continued growth of the Bank.
Results of Operations
We reported third quarter 2006 net income of $35.6 million, or $0.59 per basic share and $0.58 per diluted share, compared with $28.6 million, or $0.54 per basic share and $0.52 per diluted share, reported during the third quarter of 2005. The 24% increase in net income is primarily attributable to higher net interest income and lower provision for loan losses, partially offset by higher operating expenses and a higher provision for income taxes. Our annualized return on average total assets decreased to 1.38% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, from 1.62% for the same period in 2005. The annualized return on average stockholders equity also decreased to 14.94% for the third quarter of 2006, compared with 19.15% for the third quarter of 2005 primarily due to additional shares issued in connection with the Standard Bank acquisition.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased 34% to $104.3 million, or $1.76 per basic share and $1.72 per diluted share, compared with $77.6 million, or $1.47 per basic share and $1.43 per diluted share, reported during the same period in 2005. The increase in net income for the first nine months of 2006 is largely attributable to higher net interest income and noninterest income and lower provision for loan losses, partially offset by higher operating expenses and higher provision for income taxes. Our annualized return on average total assets decreased to 1.46% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to 1.56% for the same period in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, the annualized return on average stockholders equity decreased to 15.81% from 18.67% for the same period in 2005 as a result of additional shares issued in connection with the Standard Bank acquisition.
25
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||||||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
95.4 |
|
$ |
71.6 |
|
$ |
270.1 |
|
$ |
198.8 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
(3.5 |
) |
(4.5 |
) |
(8.2 |
) |
(13.4 |
) |
||||
Noninterest income |
|
8.1 |
|
7.8 |
|
25.1 |
|
22.3 |
|
||||
Noninterest expense |
|
(41.9 |
) |
(30.3 |
) |
(117.3 |
) |
(86.4 |
) |
||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
(22.5 |
) |
(16.0 |
) |
(65.4 |
) |
(43.7 |
) |
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
35.6 |
|
$ |
28.6 |
|
$ |
104.3 |
|
$ |
77.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Annualized return on average total assets |
|
1.38 |
% |
1.62 |
% |
1.46 |
% |
1.56 |
% |
||||
Annualized return on average stockholders equity |
|
14.94 |
% |
19.15 |
% |
15.81 |
% |
18.67 |
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our primary source of revenue is net interest income, which is the difference between interest income on earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income for the third quarter of 2006 totaled $95.4 million, a 33% increase over net interest income of $71.6 million for the same period in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, net interest income increased 36% to $270.1 million, compared to $198.8 million for the first three quarters of 2005.
Total interest and dividend income during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 increased 67% to $177.3 million, compared with $106.3 million during the same period in 2005. Correspondingly, year-to-date interest and dividend income increased 66% to $473.9 million, compared with $284.8 million during the same period in 2005. The increase in interest and dividend income during both the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 is attributable to the robust growth in average earning assets. Average earning assets grew $3.01 billion and $2.65 billion during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Growth in average loans was the primary driver for the growth in average earning assets for both periods. The net growth in average earning assets was largely funded by increases in time deposits, money market accounts, borrowings, and long-term debt.
Total interest expense during the third quarter of 2006 increased 136% to $81.9 million, compared with $34.7 million for the same period a year ago. Similarly, year-to-date interest expense through September 30, 2006 increased 137% to $203.8 million, compared with $86.0 million for the same period a year ago. The increase in interest expense during both the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 can be attributed to both the significant growth in average interest-bearing liabilities, predominantly time deposits, money market accounts, borrowings, and long-term debt, as well as higher rates paid on all categories of interest-bearing liabilities, reflecting the current interest rate environment and sustained pricing competition in the deposit market.
Net interest margin, defined as taxable equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets, decreased 33 basis points to 3.89% during the third quarter of 2006, compared with 4.22% during the third quarter of 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, the net interest margin decreased to 4.04%, from 4.22% for the corresponding period in the prior year. The overall yield on earning assets increased 95 basis points to
26
7.22% in the third quarter of 2006, from 6.27% in 2005, due to several consecutive Federal Reserve interest rate increases during the past year. Similarly, the overall yield on earning assets for the first nine months of 2006 increased 103 basis points to 7.08%, compared with 6.05% for the same period last year.
Our funding cost on interest-bearing liabilities increased by 140 basis points to 4.06% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from 2.66% in the prior year period. Likewise, our funding cost on interest-bearing liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased 138 basis points to 3.75%, from 2.37% in the prior year period. The combined impact of the current interest rate environment and heightened competition in the deposit market were the primary drivers of our increased cost of funds during both the third quarter and first nine months of 2006. To help fund our loan growth, we increased our reliance on time deposits, other borrowings and long-term debt, further contributing to the overall increase in our cost of funds for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006.
We also continue to rely on noninterest-bearing demand deposits as a funding source, with average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increasing 4% to $1.26 billion during the third quarter of 2006, compared to $1.21 billion during the same period in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased 11% to $1.24 billion, compared to $1.12 billion for the corresponding period in 2005. Our overall cost of funds, which takes into account our portfolio of noninterest-bearing demand deposits, increased 136 basis points to 3.51% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, compared to 2.15% for the same quarter in 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, our overall cost of funds also increased 128 basis points to 3.20% from 1.92% for the corresponding period in 2006.
The following table presents the net interest spread, net interest margin, average balances, interest income and expense, and the average yields and rates by asset and liability component for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:
27
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Volume |
|
Interest |
|
Yield (1) |
|
Volume |
|
Interest |
|
Yield (1) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
7,257 |
|
$ |
92 |
|
5.03 |
% |
$ |
9,655 |
|
$ |
78 |
|
3.21 |
% |
|
||||
Interest bearing deposits in other banks |
|
455 |
|
4 |
|
3.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
100,000 |
|
1,917 |
|
7.61 |
% |
12,500 |
|
224 |
|
7.11 |
% |
|
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale (2) (3) (4) |
|
1,382,977 |
|
17,860 |
|
5.12 |
% |
711,660 |
|
7,181 |
|
4.00 |
% |
|
||||||||
Loans receivable (2) (5) |
|
8,166,068 |
|
156,333 |
|
7.60 |
% |
5,935,822 |
|
98,110 |
|
6.56 |
% |
|
||||||||
FHLB and FRB stock |
|
80,671 |
|
1,106 |
|
5.44 |
% |
60,882 |
|
694 |
|
4.52 |
% |
|
||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
9,737,428 |
|
177,312 |
|
7.22 |
% |
6,730,519 |
|
106,287 |
|
6.27 |
% |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Noninterest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
|
124,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
110,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(77,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(59,976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Other assets |
|
540,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
297,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,324,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,077,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Checking accounts |
|
$ |
393,218 |
|
$ |
1,393 |
|
1.41 |
% |
$ |
338,523 |
|
662 |
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|||||
Money market accounts |
|
1,232,879 |
|
12,342 |
|
3.97 |
% |
733,825 |
|
4,162 |
|
2.25 |
% |
|
||||||||
Savings deposits |
|
407,904 |
|
746 |
|
0.73 |
% |
337,370 |
|
267 |
|
0.31 |
% |
|
||||||||
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
|
1,113,057 |
|
11,303 |
|
4.03 |
% |
853,497 |
|
4,915 |
|
2.28 |
% |
|
||||||||
Time deposits $100,000 or greater |
|
2,513,360 |
|
28,112 |
|
4.44 |
% |
1,842,909 |
|
15,269 |
|
3.29 |
% |
|
||||||||
Fed funds purchased |
|
107,639 |
|
1,462 |
|
5.39 |
% |
68,701 |
|
637 |
|
3.68 |
% |
|
||||||||
FHLB Advances |
|
1,291,627 |
|
16,081 |
|
4.94 |
% |
803,688 |
|
6,290 |
|
3.11 |
% |
|
||||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
751,095 |
|
7,024 |
|
3.71 |
% |
91,848.0 |
|
693 |
|
2.99 |
% |
|
||||||||
Long-term debt |
|
184,023 |
|
3,432 |
|
7.40 |
% |
115,253 |
|
1,810 |
|
6.23 |
% |
|
||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
7,994,802 |
|
81,895 |
|
4.06 |
% |
5,185,614 |
|
34,705 |
|
2.66 |
% |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Demand deposits |
|
1,261,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,208,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Other liabilities |
|
115,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
86,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
|
952,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
597,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
10,324,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,077,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
||||||||
Net interest income and net margin |
|
|
|
$ |
95,417 |
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
$ |
71,582 |
|
4.22 |
% |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
(1) Annualized.
(2) Includes amortization of premium and accretion of discounts on investment securities and loans receivable totaling $(1.2) million and $(126) thousand, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2006, and $(381) thousand and $197 thousand, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2005. Also includes the amortization of deferred loan fees totaling $1.6 million and $968 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(3) Average balances exclude unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities.
(4) The yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis as the effects are not material.
(5) Average balances include nonperforming loans.
28
The following table presents the net interest spread, net interest margin, average balances, interest income and expense, and the average yields and rates by asset and liability component for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Volume |
|
Interest |
|
Yield (1) |
|
Volume |
|
Interest |
|
Yield (1) |
|
||||
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
10,735 |
|
$ |
320 |
|
3.99 |
% |
$ |
8,173 |
|
$ |
177 |
|
2.90 |
% |
Interest bearing deposits in other banks |
|
432 |
|
12 |
|
3.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
93,040 |
|
5,160 |
|
7.41 |
% |
4,213 |
|
224 |
|
7.11 |
% |
||||
Investment securities available-for-sale (2) (3) (4) |
|
1,113,006 |
|
40,024 |
|
4.81 |
% |
639,763 |
|
18,020 |
|
3.77 |
% |
||||
Loans receivable (2) (5) |
|
7,660,145 |
|
425,630 |
|
7.43 |
% |
5,582,437 |
|
264,340 |
|
6.33 |
% |
||||
FHLB and FRB stock |
|
67,504 |
|
2,716 |
|
5.38 |
% |
60,415 |
|
2,051 |
|
4.54 |
% |
||||
Total interest-earning assets |
|
8,944,862 |
|
473,862 |
|
7.08 |
% |
6,295,001 |
|
284,812 |
|
6.05 |
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Noninterest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash and due from banks |
|
129,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
104,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(74,765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(56,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Other assets |
|
497,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
270,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,497,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,613,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Checking accounts |
|
$ |
418,524 |
|
$ |
4,095 |
|
1.31 |
% |
334,127 |
|
1,909 |
|
0.76 |
% |
||
Money market accounts |
|
1,163,839 |
|
31,261 |
|
3.59 |
% |
651,005 |
|
10,175 |
|
2.09 |
% |
||||
Savings deposits |
|
391,773 |
|
1,948 |
|
0.66 |
% |
327,775 |
|
657 |
|
0.27 |
% |
||||
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
|
1,087,945 |
|
29,810 |
|
3.66 |
% |
809,061 |
|
13,430 |
|
2.22 |
% |
||||
Time deposits $100,000 or greater |
|
2,407,942 |
|
75,610 |
|
4.20 |
% |
1,647,462 |
|
34,789 |
|
2.82 |
% |
||||
Fed funds purchased |
|
102,343 |
|
3,789 |
|
4.95 |
% |
27,242 |
|
739 |
|
3.63 |
% |
||||
FHLB Advances |
|
983,001 |
|
32,988 |
|
4.49 |
% |
947,819 |
|
19,361 |
|
2.73 |
% |
||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
535,992 |
|
14,906 |
|
3.72 |
% |
30,952 |
|
693 |
|
2.99 |
% |
||||
Long-term debt |
|
175,526 |
|
9,346 |
|
7.12 |
% |
88,485 |
|
4,295 |
|
6.49 |
% |
||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
7,266,885 |
|
203,753 |
|
3.75 |
% |
4,863,928 |
|
86,048 |
|
2.37 |
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Demand deposits |
|
1,241,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,115,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other liabilities |
|
109,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
80,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stockholders equity |
|
879,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
553,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
9,497,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,613,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
3.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
||||
Net interest income and net margin |
|
|
|
$ |
270,109 |
|
4.04 |
% |
|
|
$ |
198,764 |
|
4.22 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Annualized.
(2) Includes amortization of premium and accretion of discounts on investment securities and loans receivable totaling $(2.2) million and $414 thousand, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, and $(490) thousand and $603 thousand, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Also includes the amortization of deferred loan fees totaling $5.2 million and $2.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(3) Average balances exclude unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities.
(4) The yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis as the effects are not material.
(5) Average balances include nonperforming loans.
29
Changes in net interest income are a function of changes in rates and volumes of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table sets forth information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated. The total change for each category of interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability is segmented into the change attributable to variations in volume (changes in volume multiplied by old rate) and the change attributable to variations in interest rates (changes in rates multiplied by old volume). Nonaccrual loans are included in average loans used to compute this table.
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Changes Due to |
|
Total |
|
Changes Due to |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Change |
|
Volume (1) |
|
Rates (1) |
|
Change |
|
Volume (1) |
|
Rates (1) |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
$ |
37 |
|
$ |
143 |
|
$ |
65 |
|
$ |
78 |
|
Interest bearing deposits in other banks |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
12 |
|
|
|
||||||
Securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
1,693 |
|
1,676 |
|
17 |
|
4,936 |
|
4,926 |
|
10 |
|
||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
10,679 |
|
8,236 |
|
2,443 |
|
22,004 |
|
16,014 |
|
5,990 |
|
||||||
Loans receivable |
|
58,223 |
|
40,967 |
|
17,256 |
|
161,290 |
|
110,023 |
|
51,267 |
|
||||||
FHLB and FRB stock |
|
412 |
|
254 |
|
158 |
|
665 |
|
258 |
|
407 |
|
||||||
Total interest and dividend income |
|
$ |
71,025 |
|
$ |
51,114 |
|
$ |
19,911 |
|
$ |
189,050 |
|
$ |
131,298 |
|
$ |
57,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Checking accounts |
|
$ |
731 |
|
$ |
121 |
|
$ |
610 |
|
$ |
2,186 |
|
$ |
572 |
|
$ |
1,614 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
8,180 |
|
3,850 |
|
4,330 |
|
21,086 |
|
11,027 |
|
10,059 |
|
||||||
Savings deposits |
|
479 |
|
66 |
|
413 |
|
1,291 |
|
150 |
|
1,141 |
|
||||||
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
|
6,388 |
|
1,820 |
|
4,568 |
|
16,380 |
|
5,672 |
|
10,708 |
|
||||||
Time deposits $100,000 or greater |
|
12,843 |
|
6,546 |
|
6,297 |
|
40,821 |
|
19,864 |
|
20,957 |
|
||||||
Federal funds purchased |
|
825 |
|
453 |
|
372 |
|
3,050 |
|
2,694 |
|
356 |
|
||||||
FHLB advances |
|
9,791 |
|
4,962 |
|
4,829 |
|
13,627 |
|
744 |
|
12,883 |
|
||||||
Securities sold under resale agreements |
|
6,331 |
|
6,127 |
|
204 |
|
14,213 |
|
14,005 |
|
208 |
|
||||||
Long-term debt |
|
1,622 |
|
1,234 |
|
388 |
|
5,051 |
|
4,598 |
|
453 |
|
||||||
Total interest expense |
|
47,190 |
|
25,179 |
|
22,011 |
|
117,705 |
|
59,326 |
|
58,379 |
|
||||||
|
|
$ |
23,835 |
|
$ |
25,935 |
|
$ |
(2,100 |
) |
$ |
71,345 |
|
$ |
71,972 |
|
$ |
(627 |
) |
(1) Change in interest income/expense not arising from volume or rate variances are allocated proportionately to rate and volume.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses amounted to $3.5 million for the third quarter of 2006, compared to $4.5 million for the same period in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, the provision for loan losses totaled $8.2 million, compared to $13.4 million for the same period in 2005. Provisions for loan losses are charged to income to bring the allowance for credit losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on the factors discussed under the Allowance for Loan Losses section of this report.
30
Components of Noninterest Income
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||||||||
Branch fees |
|
$ |
2.84 |
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
$ |
8.27 |
|
$ |
5.14 |
|
Letters of credit fees and commissions |
|
2.07 |
|
2.03 |
|
6.40 |
|
6.53 |
|
||||
Ancillary loan fees |
|
0.92 |
|
0.64 |
|
2.84 |
|
1.77 |
|
||||
Net gain on sales of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
0.68 |
|
1.79 |
|
2.54 |
|
3.52 |
|
||||
Income from life insurance policies |
|
0.97 |
|
0.87 |
|
2.78 |
|
2.44 |
|
||||
Income from secondary market activities |
|
0.12 |
|
0.13 |
|
0.49 |
|
1.31 |
|
||||
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
||||
Other operating income |
|
0.50 |
|
0.51 |
|
1.67 |
|
1.58 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
8.10 |
|
$ |
7.83 |
|
$ |
25.08 |
|
$ |
22.29 |
|
Noninterest income includes revenues earned from sources other than interest income. These sources include: service charges and fees on deposit accounts, fees and commissions generated from trade finance activities and the issuance of letters of credit, income from secondary market activities, ancillary fees on loans, net gains on sales of loans, investment securities available-for-sale and other assets, and other noninterest-related revenues.
Noninterest income increased 4% to $8.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2006 from $7.8 million for the same quarter in 2005, primarily due to higher branch fees and ancillary loan fees partially offset by a decrease in net gain on sales of investment securities available-for-sale. For the first nine months of 2006, noninterest income increased 12% to $25.1 million, compared to $22.3 million for the first nine months of 2005 predominantly due to higher branch fees and ancillary loan fees partially offset by decreases in net gain on sales of investment securities available-for-sale and income from secondary market activities.
Branch fees, which represent revenues derived from branch operations, increased 53% to $2.8 million for the third quarter of 2006 from $1.9 million for the same quarter in 2005. Similarly, branch fee income for the first nine months of 2006 increased 61% to $8.3 million, compared to $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in branch-related fee income for both periods can be attributed primarily to higher revenues from alternative investments offered to customers including mutual fund and annuity products, as well as growth in wire transfer fee income and analysis charges on commercial deposit accounts.
Ancillary loan fees increased 43% to $925 thousand for the third quarter of 2006 from $645 thousand for the corresponding quarter in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, ancillary loan fees increased 60% to $2.8 million, compared to $1.8 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in ancillary loan fees for both the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 is primarily due to a rise in servicing income received related to securitized loans. During 2006, the Bank has securitized $334.5 million in single family and multifamily loans through September 30, 2006. In comparison, multifamily loans totaling $209.6 million were securitized during 2005.
Income from secondary market activities slightly decreased by 5% to $123 thousand for the third quarter of 2006, compared with $130 thousand for the same period in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, income
31
from secondary market activities decreased 62% to $496 thousand, from $1.3 million for the same period in 2005. The decrease in secondary market income during the first nine months of 2006, relative to the same period in 2005, is primarily due to a gain of $768 thousand from the sale of $51.7 million in fixed rate single family loans to a third party recorded during the second quarter of 2005.
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned (OREO) amounted to $88 thousand during the first nine months of 2006, representing the gain on sale of a condominium unit that was held as partial collateral for a commercial business loan. This gain was recorded during the first quarter of 2006. No such gains were recorded during the third quarter of 2006.
Other noninterest income, which includes insurance commissions and insurance-related service fees, rental income, and other miscellaneous income, amounted to $504 thousand during the third quarter of 2006, comparable to the revenues recorded during the same period in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, other noninterest income increased 6% to $1.7 million, compared to $1.6 million for the nine months of 2005.
Noninterest Expense
Components of Noninterest Expense
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
$ |
18.59 |
|
$ |
12.98 |
|
$ |
50.59 |
|
$ |
38.32 |
|
Occupancy and equipment expense |
|
5.60 |
|
3.74 |
|
15.73 |
|
10.43 |
|
||||
Deposit-related expenses |
|
2.37 |
|
2.33 |
|
7.02 |
|
6.09 |
|
||||
Amortization of premiums on deposits acquired |
|
1.69 |
|
0.78 |
|
5.31 |
|
1.99 |
|
||||
Amortization of investments in affordable housing partnerships |
|
1.56 |
|
1.58 |
|
4.28 |
|
4.97 |
|
||||
Data processing |
|
0.89 |
|
0.72 |
|
2.68 |
|
1.94 |
|
||||
Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments |
|
0.34 |
|
0.26 |
|
1.02 |
|
0.71 |
|
||||
Other operating expenses |
|
10.91 |
|
7.92 |
|
30.64 |
|
21.98 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
41.95 |
|
$ |
30.31 |
|
$ |
117.27 |
|
$ |
86.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Efficiency Ratio (1) |
|
37 |
% |
35 |
% |
36 |
% |
36 |
% |
(1) Represents noninterest expense (excluding the amortization of intangibles and investments in afffordable housing partnerships) divided by the aggregate of net interest income before provision for loan losses and noninterest income.
Noninterest expense, which is comprised primarily of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy and other operating expenses increased 38% to $41.9 million during the third quarter of 2006, from $30.3 million for the same quarter in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, noninterest expense increased 36% to $117.3 million, compared with $86.4 million during the same period in 2005.
Compensation and employee benefits expense increased 43% to $18.6 million during the third quarter of 2006, compared to $13.0 million for the same quarter last year. For the first nine months of 2006, compensation and employee benefits increased 32% to $50.6 million, compared with $38.3 million for the first nine months of 2005. The increase in compensation and employee benefits expense for both periods is primarily due to
32
increased staffing levels related to the acquisitions of United National Bank in September 2005 and Standard Bank in March 2006. Moreover, the impact of annual salary adjustments and related cost increases for existing employees further contributed to the rise in compensation expense and employee benefits during both the third quarter and first nine months of 2006. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006, we also recorded $399 thousand and $1.5 million, respectively, in compensation expense related to stock options as a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) effective January 1, 2006.
Occupancy and equipment expenses increased 50% to $5.6 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, compared with $3.7 million during the same period in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, occupancy and equipment expenses totaled $15.7 million, a 51% increase when compared to the $10.4 million incurred during the first nine months of 2005. The rise in occupancy expenses can be attributed to the recent relocation and expansion of our corporate headquarters to Pasadena, California, increasing rent, common area, and depreciation expenses. Additionally, rent expense attributed to the eleven branch locations acquired from United National Bank in September 2005, the six branch locations acquired from Standard Bank in March 2006, as well as the opening of a new 99 Ranch in-store branch location during March 2006 further contributed to the increase in occupancy and equipment expense during both the third quarter and first nine months of 2006.
Deposit-related expenses increased 2% to $2.4 million during the third quarter of 2006, compared to $2.3 million for the same quarter last year. For the first nine months of 2006, deposit-related expenses increased 15% to $7.0 million, from $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Deposit-related expenses, which represent various business-related expenses paid by the Bank on behalf of its commercial account customers, are eventually recouped by the Bank through subsequent account analysis charges to individual customer accounts. The increase in deposit-related expenses is directly correlated to the growth in the volume of commercial deposit accounts since the third quarter of 2005.
The amortization of premiums on deposits acquired increased 116% to $1.7 million during the third quarter of 2006, compared with $782 thousand for the corresponding quarter of 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, the amortization of premiums on deposits acquired increased 167% to $5.3 million, compared to $2.0 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in amortization expense is due to additional deposit premiums of $15.0 million and $8.6 million recorded in connection with the acquisitions of United National Bank in September 2005 and Standard Bank in March 2006, respectively. Premiums on acquired deposits are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
The amortization of investments in affordable housing partnerships totaled $1.6 million for both the quarters ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, the amortization of investments in affordable housing partnerships decreased 14% to $4.3 million, compared to $5.0 million for the same period in 2005. Additional purchases of investments in affordable housing partnerships totaling $3.0 million were made in the third quarter of 2006. There were no such investment purchases during 2005. Total investments in affordable housing partnerships decreased to $29.7 million as of September 30, 2006, compared to $32.5 million as of September 30, 2005.
Data processing expenses increased 24% to $890 thousand during the third quarter of 2006, compared with $717 thousand for the corresponding quarter in 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, data processing expenses increased 38% to $2.7 million, from $1.9 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in data processing expenses is primarily due to increased transaction volume stemming from our overall growth, both organically and through acquisitions.
Other operating expenses include advertising and public relations, telephone and postage, stationery and supplies, bank and item processing charges, insurance, legal and other professional fees. Other operating expenses increased 38% to $10.9 million during the third quarter of 2006, from $7.9 million for the same quarter
33
in 2005. Similarly, other operating expenses increased 39% to $30.6 million for the first nine months of 2006, from $22.0 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in other operating expenses is largely due to additional expenses incurred to support our continued overall expansion. Additionally, we have amplified our advertising, public relations, and marketing efforts to enhance our overall image and visibility in the community and in the industry.
Our efficiency ratio of 37% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 increased slightly from 35% for the corresponding quarter in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, the efficiency ratio remained stable at 36% compared to the same period a year ago. Although the Company has experienced significant expansion and growth, we have managed to sustain our operational efficiencies as a result of past and ongoing infrastructure investments compounded by a general company-wide effort to monitor overall operating expenses.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes increased 41% to $22.5 million for the third quarter of 2006, compared with $16.0 million for the same quarter in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, the provision for taxes totaled $65.5 million, a 50% increase from the $43.7 million income tax expense recorded for the same period a year ago. The increase in the provision for income taxes is primarily attributable to a 30% and 40% increase in pretax earnings during the third quarter and first nine months of 2006, respectively. The provision for income taxes for the third quarter of 2006 reflects the utilization of affordable housing tax credits totaling $1.2 million, compared to $1.5 million utilized during the third quarter of 2005. The third quarter 2006 provision reflects an effective tax rate of 38.8%, compared with 35.9% for the corresponding period in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, the effective tax rate of 38.6% reflects tax credits of $3.5 million, compared with an effective tax rate of 36.0% for the first nine months of 2005 reflecting tax credits of $4.3 million.
As previously reported, the California Franchise Tax Board announced that it is taking the position that certain tax deductions related to regulated investment companies will be disallowed pursuant to California Senate Bill 614 and California Assembly Bill 1601, which were signed into law in the fourth quarter of 2003. East West Securities Company, Inc., a regulated investment company formed and funded in July 2000 to raise capital in an efficient and economical manner was dissolved on December 30, 2002 as a result of, among other reasons, proposed legislation to change the tax treatments of RICs. The Fund provided state tax benefits beginning in 2000 until the end of 2002, when the RIC was officially dissolved. While the Companys management continues to believe that the tax benefits realized in previous years were appropriate and fully defensible under the existing tax codes at that time, the Company has deemed it prudent to participate in the voluntary compliance initiative offered by the State of California to avoid certain potential penalties should the FTB choose to litigate its announced position about the tax treatment of RICs for periods prior to enactment of the legislation described above and should the FTB be successful in that litigation.
Pursuant to the VCI program, we filed amended California income tax returns on April 15, 2004 for all affected years and paid the resulting taxes and interest due to the FTB. This amounted to an aggregate payment of $14.2 million for tax years 2000, 2001, and 2002. We continue to believe that the tax deductions are appropriate and, as such, we have also filed refund claims for the amounts paid with the amended returns. These refund claims are reflected as assets in the Companys consolidated financial statements. As a result of these actionsamending our California income tax returns and subsequent related filing of refund claimswe retain our potential exposure for assertion of an accuracy-related penalty should the FTB prevail in its position, in addition to our risk of not being successful in our refund claim for taxes and interest. Our potential exposure to all other penalties, however, has been eliminated through this course of action.
34
The Franchise Tax Board is currently in the process of reviewing and assessing our refund claims for taxes and interest for tax years 2000 through 2002. Management is continuing to pursue these refund claims, to monitor developments in the law in this area, and to monitor the status of tax claims with respect to other registered investment companies.
Operating Segment Results
The Company has identified four principal operating segments for purposes of management reporting: retail banking, commercial lending, treasury, and residential lending. Although all four operating segments offer financial products and services, they are managed separately based on each segments strategic focus. While the retail banking segment focuses primarily on retail operations through the Banks branch network, certain designated branches have responsibility for generating commercial deposits and loans. The commercial lending segment, which includes commercial real estate, primarily generates commercial loans and deposits through the efforts of commercial lending officers located in the Banks northern and southern California production offices. The treasury departments primary focus is managing the Banks investments, liquidity, and interest rate risk; the residential lending segment is mainly responsible for the Banks portfolio of single family and multifamily residential loans. The Companys remaining centralized functions and eliminations of inter-segment amounts have been aggregated and included in Other.
Future changes in the Companys management structure or reporting methodologies may result in changes in the measurement of operating segment results. Results for prior periods have been restated for comparability for changes in management structure or reporting methodologies. Specifically, an adjustment was made to reallocate the credit provided for in the Companys capital to the treasury segment from the Other category. The adjustment resulted in an increase in the treasury segments pretax profit of $6.6 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, this adjustment resulted in an increase in the treasury segments pretax profit of $18.7 million and $11.7 million, respectively. For more information about our segments, including information about the underlying accounting and reporting process, please see Note 9 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein.
Retail Banking Segment
The retail banking segments pre-tax income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 increased 73% to $29.0 million, compared to $16.7 million for the corresponding quarter in 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, pre-tax income for the retail banking segment increased 102% to $86.4 million, from $42.7 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in pre-tax income is largely attributable to the growth in net interest income increasing 42% to $51.5 million during the third quarter of 2006, and 57% to $146.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. In comparison, net interest income totaled $36.3 million for the third quarter of 2005 and $93.6 million for the first nine months of 2005. The increase in net interest income is primarily due to our overall growth both organically and through acquisitions. The acquisitions of United National Bank in September 2005 and Standard Bank in March 2006 added seventeen new locations to our expanding branch network as well as several thousand new customers to our existing customer base.
Noninterest income for this segment increased $1.0 million, or 21%, to $5.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, compared to $4.8 million recorded during the same quarter in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, noninterest income for the retail banking segment increased $5.8 million, or 50%, to $17.4 million, compared to $11.6 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in noninterest income for both periods is primarily due to fee income growth from loan origination and deposit gathering activities, as well as higher fees earned from alternative investment product offerings at the branches.
35
Noninterest expense for this segment increased 35% to $22.0 million during the third quarter of 2006, compared with $16.3 million recorded during the third quarter of 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, noninterest expense increased 40% to $64.2 million, from $46.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in noninterest expense for both periods is primarily due to higher compensation and employee benefits, occupancy expenses, commercial deposit related expenses, and other operating expenses. The increase in compensation and employee benefits can be attributed to higher staffing levels due to the acquisitions of United National Bank and Standard Bank, as well as the addition of relationship officers and operational personnel throughout the past year. Higher occupancy expenses are due primarily to increased expenses associated with eleven additional branch locations from United National Bank, six additional branch locations from Standard Bank, and a new in-store branch location opened in March 2006. Similarly, the increase in other operating expenses can be attributed predominantly to the overall growth in this segment arising from recent acquisitions.
Commercial Lending Segment
The commercial lending segments pre-tax income increased 13% to $22.2 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, compared with $19.7 million for the corresponding quarter in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, pre-tax income for the commercial lending segment increased 22% to $68.0 million, from $55.9 million for the same period in 2005. The primary driver of the increase in pre-tax income for this segment is a 17% increase in net interest income to $27.3 million during the third quarter of 2006, and 20% to $79.8 million for the first nine months of 2006. In comparison, net interest income totaled $23.3 million for the third quarter in 2005 and $66.5 million for the first nine months of 2005. The increase in net interest income for both periods is primarily due to the notable growth of our commercial loan portfolio, which includes commercial real estate, construction, and commercial business loans, including trade finance products, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2006, relative to the same periods in the prior year. Specifically, the average aggregate balance of all commercial loan categories grew 41% during the third quarter and first nine months of 2006, compared with the corresponding periods in 2005.
Noninterest income for this segment increased $2.0 million or 36% to $7.4 million during the third quarter of 2006, compared to the $5.4 million recorded in the corresponding quarter of 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, noninterest income increased $4.9 million, or 30%, to $21.1 million, from $16.2 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in noninterest income for both periods is primarily due to higher loan fees collected as a result of the growth in loan origination volume during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006, relative to the same periods in 2005.
Noninterest expense for this segment also increased 38% to $8.1 million during the third quarter of 2006, from $5.8 million during the same quarter last year. For the first nine months of 2006, noninterest expense increased 34%, to $23.6 million, from $17.6 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in noninterest expense is largely a result of higher compensation and employee benefits which increased 34% to $5.8 million during the third quarter of 2006 and 33% to $17.0 million during the first nine months of 2006. The increase in compensation and employee benefits is a result of increasing staffing levels due to the acquisitions of United National Bank and Standard Bank as well as the addition of relationship officers and operational personnel to support the continuing growth of the Bank.
Treasury Segment
The treasury segments pre-tax income increased 65% to $11.5 million during the third quarter of 2006 as compared to $7.0 million in the same quarter of 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, pre-tax income for the treasury segment increased 24% to $27.3 million, from $22.1 million for the same period in 2005. Net
36
interest income increased 152% to $14.2 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, from $5.7 million during the same quarter in 2005. Similarly, net interest income increased 32% to $26.4 million for the first nine months of 2006, from $20.0 million for the first nine months of 2005. The increase in net interest income for both the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 is largely a result of higher interest earned on investment securities relative to rates paid on borrowings.
Noninterest income for this segment declined 62% to $676 thousand during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, compared to $1.8 million for the corresponding quarter in 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, noninterest income for the treasury segment decreased 30% to $2.5 million, compared to $3.6 million for the first nine months of 2005. The decrease in noninterest income for both the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 can be attributed entirely to lower net gains on sales of investment securities relative to the corresponding periods in 2005.
Noninterest expense for this segment increased 61% to $388 thousand during the third quarter of 2006, from $240 thousand during the same quarter in 2005. Similarly, noninterest expense increased 43% to $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared with $730 thousand for the same period in 2005. The increase in noninterest expense for both the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 is primarily due to higher compensation expense resulting from increased staffing levels.
Residential Lending Segment
The residential lending segments pre-tax income decreased 41% to $1.8 million during the third quarter of 2006, from $3.1 million during the corresponding quarter in 2005. Similarly, pre-tax income for the first nine months of 2006 also declined 45% to $6.7 million, from $12.2 million for the same period in 2005. The decrease in pre-tax income is partly due to the decrease in net interest income for this segment, which declined 30% to $3.6 million during the third quarter of 2006 and 29% to $11.0 million for the first nine months of 2006. In comparison, net interest income totaled $5.1 million and $15.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. The decrease in net interest income for both periods reflects the highly competitive market pricing environment for residential mortgage loans as well as the securitization of single family and multifamily loans totaling $334.5 million year to date through September 30, 2006.
Noninterest income for this segment increased 12% to $854 thousand during the third quarter of 2006, compared to $765 thousand recorded during the third quarter of 2005, predominantly due to a rise in servicing income received related to loans securitized during 2006. For the first nine months of 2006, noninterest income decreased 24% to $2.8 million, compared to $3.6 million earned during the first nine months of 2005. The decrease in noninterest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is primarily due to the increase in fees waived on single family and multifamily loan products resulting from competitive market pressures during the first half of 2006, partially offset by higher servicing fee income in 2006 relative to 2005.
Noninterest expense for this segment decreased 9% to $1.4 million for the third quarter of 2006, compared to $1.6 for the corresponding quarter in 2005. For the first nine months of 2006, noninterest expense declined 6% to $4.2 million, from $4.4 million for the first nine months of 2005. The slight decrease in noninterest expense for both the third quarter and first nine months of 2006, relative to the same periods in 2005, is due to lower compensation and employee benefits and other operating expenses. These expenses were partially offset by higher occupancy expenses due to the relocation of the residential lending unit during the third quarter of 2006.
37
Balance Sheet Analysis
Our total assets increased $2.53 billion, or 31%, to $10.81 billion, as of September 30, 2006, relative to total assets of $8.28 billion at December 31, 2005. The increase in total assets resulted primarily from increases in net loans of $1.64 billion and investment securities available-for-sale of $620.3 million. The increase in total assets was largely funded by increases in deposits of $841.1 million, FHLB advances of $882.2 million and securities sold under repurchase agreements of $500.0 million.
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Total investment securities available-for-sale increased 71% to $1.49 billion as of September 30, 2006, compared with $869.8 million at December 31, 2005. Total repayments/maturities and proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities amounted to $798.7 million and $232.4 million, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Proceeds from repayments, maturities, sales, and redemptions were applied towards additional investment securities purchases totaling $1.32 billion as well as funding a portion of loan originations made during the first nine months of 2006. We recorded net gains totaling $2.5 million on sales of available-for-sale securities during the first nine months of 2006.
During the second quarter of 2006, the Company completed two securitization transactions involving both single family and multifamily loans. On April 21, 2006, the Company securitized $217.0 million in single family loans in a private label guaranteed mortgage securitization issued through East West Mortgage Securities, LLC. The underlying loans for the AAA/Aa1 pass through securities issued were all jumbo single family loans originated by the Bank. We recorded $2.2 million in mortgage servicing assets as a result of this single family securitization transaction as the Bank continues to service the underlying loans. On June 26, 2006, we securitized another $117.5 million of multifamily loans through the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and recorded $1.5 million in related mortgage servicing assets. We retained all the resulting securities from these securitization transactions in our available-for-sale portfolio. In accordance with SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125, both transactions were accounted for as neither sales nor financings which had no impact on our results of operations. We plan to securitize additional single family and multifamily loans in the foreseeable future for both liquidity and capital management purposes.
The Company performs regular impairment analyses on the investment securities available-for-sale portfolio. If the Company determines that a decline in fair value is other-than-than temporary, an impairment writedown is recognized in current earnings. Other-than-temporary declines in fair value are assessed based on the duration the security has been in a continuous unrealized loss position, the severity of the decline in value, the rating of the security and our ability and intent on holding the securities until the fair values recover.
The increase in net unrealized losses in our investment securities available-for-sale portfolio of $8.5 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 is largely a result of market interest rate fluctuations. Specifically, the increase in unrealized loss was largely due to a gross unrealized loss in other mortgage-backed securities of $10.3 million as of September 30, 2006. The issuers of these securities have not, to our knowledge, established any cause for default on these securities and the various rating agencies have reaffirmed these securities long term investment grade status at September 30, 2006. The Company has the ability and the intention to hold these securities until their fair values recover. As such, management does not believe that there are any securities, other than those previously identified in prior periods, that are other-than-temporarily impaired, and therefore, no impairment charges as of September 30, 2006 are warranted.
38
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and the estimated fair values of investment securities available-for-sale as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Estimated |
|
||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||
As of September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
2,490 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
2,489 |
|
U.S. Government agency securities and U.S. Government sponsored enterprise debt securities |
|
1,115,292 |
|
777 |
|
(3,150 |
) |
1,112,919 |
|
||||
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities |
|
105,739 |
|
576 |
|
(1,571 |
) |
104,744 |
|
||||
Other mortgage-backed securities |
|
209,039 |
|
731 |
|
(10,315 |
) |
199,455 |
|
||||
Corporate debt securities |
|
4,648 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
4,540 |
|
||||
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise equity securities |
|
65,502 |
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
64,948 |
|
||||
Residual interest in securitized loans |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,502,710 |
|
$ |
3,101 |
|
$ |
(15,699 |
) |
$ |
1,490,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
1,497 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,497 |
|
U.S. Government agency securities and U.S. Government sponsored enterprise debt securities |
|
615,105 |
|
|
|
(4,868 |
) |
610,237 |
|
||||
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities |
|
189,147 |
|
2,526 |
|
(1,758 |
) |
189,915 |
|
||||
Other mortgage-backed securities |
|
14,119 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
14,104 |
|
||||
Corporate debt securities |
|
17,998 |
|
41 |
|
(227 |
) |
17,812 |
|
||||
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise equity securities |
|
36,103 |
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
35,868 |
|
||||
Residual interest in securitized loans |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
873,969 |
|
$ |
2,971 |
|
$ |
(7,103 |
) |
$ |
869,837 |
|
Loans
We offer a broad range of products designed to meet the credit needs of our borrowers. Our lending activities consist of residential single family loans, residential multifamily loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial business loans, trade finance loans, and consumer loans. Loan growth continued to be strong during the first nine months of 2006. Total gross loans increased $1.65 billion, or 24% to $8.45 billion at September 30, 2006. Excluding the impact of the $495.1 million in gross loans acquired from Standard Bank and $334.5 million in loan securitizations, organic loan growth for the first nine months of 2006 amounted to $1.49 billion, or an increase of 22% (29% annualized).
Excluding the impact of loan securitizations as well as the Standard Bank acquisition, the growth in loans is comprised of net increases in single family loans of $278.4 million or 55%, multifamily loans of $294.8 million or 24%, commercial real estate loans of $351.5 million or 11%, construction loans of $354.9 million or 55%, commercial business loans of $213.2 million or 33% and trade finance loans of $37.6 million or 16%. These increases are partially offset by net decreases in consumer loans, including home equity lines of credit, of $37.2 million or 18%.
The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:
39
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Residential, single family |
|
$ |
617,176 |
|
7.3 |
% |
$ |
509,151 |
|
7.5 |
% |
Residential, multifamily |
|
1,721,409 |
|
20.4 |
% |
1,239,836 |
|
18.3 |
% |
||
Commercial and industrial real estate |
|
3,796,418 |
|
44.9 |
% |
3,321,520 |
|
48.9 |
% |
||
Construction |
|
1,015,069 |
|
12.0 |
% |
640,654 |
|
9.4 |
% |
||
Total real estate loans |
|
7,150,072 |
|
84.6 |
% |
5,711,161 |
|
84.1 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial business |
|
856,779 |
|
10.1 |
% |
643,296 |
|
9.5 |
% |
||
Trade finance |
|
268,332 |
|
3.2 |
% |
230,771 |
|
3.4 |
% |
||
Automobile |
|
9,647 |
|
0.1 |
% |
8,543 |
|
0.1 |
% |
||
Other consumer |
|
162,936 |
|
2.0 |
% |
200,254 |
|
2.9 |
% |
||
Total other loans |
|
1,297,694 |
|
15.4 |
% |
1,082,864 |
|
15.9 |
% |
||
Total gross loans |
|
8,447,766 |
|
100.0 |
% |
6,794,025 |
|
100.0 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unearned fees, premiums and discounts, net |
|
(4,990 |
) |
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
|
|
||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(79,096 |
) |
|
|
(68,635 |
) |
|
|
||
Loan receivable, net |
|
$ |
8,363,680 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,724,320 |
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets are comprised of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more but not on nonaccrual, restructured loans and other real estate owned, net. Nonperforming assets totaled $13.5 million or 0.12% of total assets at September 30, 2006 and $30.1 million or 0.36% of total assets at December 31, 2005. Nonaccrual loans amounted to $10.6 million at September 30, 2006, compared with $24.1 million at year-end 2005. Loans totaling $8.3 million were placed on nonaccrual status during the third quarter of 2006. These additions to nonaccrual loans were offset by $75 thousand in principal paydowns, $5.2 million in loans brought current, and one loan amounting to $97 thousand transferred to other real estate owned. Additions to nonaccrual loans during the third quarter of 2006 were comprised of $1.9 million in single family loans, $1.1 million in multifamily loans, $2.5 million in commercial real estate loans, a $1.0 million construction loan, $863 thousand in commercial business loans, a $682 thousand trade finance loan, and $187 thousand in Small Business Administration (SBA) loans.
There were no loans past due 90 days or more but not on nonaccrual status at September 30, 2006. This compares to $5.7 million in such loans at December 31, 2005 representing four trade finance loans that were fully guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of United States. During the first quarter of 2006, three of these loans totaling $2.2 million were paid in full through claims to the Export-Import Bank of the United States. The other loan amounting to $3.4 million was brought current during the first quarter of 2006.
Restructured loans represent loans that have had their original terms modified. There were no restructured loans as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Other real estate owned includes properties acquired through foreclosure or through full or partial satisfaction of loans. We had two OREO properties at September 30, 2006 with an aggregate carrying value of $2.9 million representing an industrial property held as collateral for a commercial real estate loan and a single family residential property held as collateral for a commercial business loan. In comparison, we had one OREO
40
property with a carrying value of $299 thousand at December 31, 2005, representing a condominium unit that was held as partial collateral for a commercial business loan. This OREO property was sold in March 2006 resulting in a gain on sale of $88 thousand.
The following table sets forth information regarding nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more but not on nonaccrual, restructured loans and other real estate owned as of the dates indicated:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
10,619 |
|
$ |
24,149 |
|
Loans past due 90 days or more but not on nonaccrual |
|
|
|
5,670 |
|
||
Total nonperforming loans |
|
10,619 |
|
29,819 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restructured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other real estate owned, net |
|
2,884 |
|
299 |
|
||
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
13,503 |
|
$ |
30,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
0.12 |
% |
0.36 |
% |
||
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
744.85 |
% |
230.17 |
% |
||
Nonperforming loans to total gross loans |
|
0.13 |
% |
0.44 |
% |
We evaluate loan impairment according to the provisions of SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended. Under SFAS No. 114, loans are considered impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled interest payments. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or, as an expedient, at the loans observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, less costs to sell. If the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the deficiency will be charged off against the allowance for loan losses. Also in accordance with SFAS No. 114, loans that are considered impaired are specifically excluded from the quarterly migration analysis when determining the amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses required for the period.
At September 30, 2006, we classified $10.6 million of our loans as impaired, compared with $24.1 million at December 31, 2005. Specific reserves on impaired loans totaled $3 thousand at September 30, 2006, compared with $1.3 million at December 31, 2005. Our average recorded investment in impaired loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were $10.7 million and $9.9 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, gross interest income that would have been recorded on impaired loans, had they performed in accordance with their original terms, totaled $642 thousand and $814 thousand, respectively. Of this amount, actual interest recognized on impaired loans, on a cash basis, was $210 thousand and $463 thousand, respectively.
41
Allowance for Loan Losses
We are committed to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level that is considered to be commensurate with estimated and known risks in the portfolio. Although the adequacy of the allowance is reviewed quarterly, our management performs an ongoing assessment of the risks inherent in the portfolio. While we believe that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at September 30, 2006, future additions to the allowance will be subject to continuing evaluation of estimated and known, as well as inherent, risks in the loan portfolio.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses which is charged against current period operating results, and is decreased by the amount of net chargeoffs during the period. At September 30, 2006, the allowance for loan losses amounted to $79.1 million, or 0.94% of total loans, compared with $68.6 million, or 1.01% of total loans, at December 31, 2005, and $67.4 million, or 1.02% of total loans, at September 30, 2005. The $10.5 million increase in the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2006, from year-end 2005, is comprised of $8.2 million in additional loss provisions and $4.1 million in loss reserves acquired from Standard Bank reduced by $391 thousand in net chargeoffs recorded during the period. Additionally, we reclassified $1.4 million from the allowance for loan losses to other liabilities during the first nine months of 2006. This amount represents additional loss allowances required for unfunded loan commitments and off-balance sheet credit exposures related primarily to our trade finance lending activities. The allowance for unfunded loan commitments and off-balance sheet credit exposures is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities and amounted to $12.5 million at September 30, 2006.
The provision for loan losses of $3.5 million for the third quarter of 2006 represents a 22% decrease from the $4.5 million in loss provisions charged during the third quarter of 2005. Third quarter 2006 net chargeoffs amounted to $132 thousand and represent 0.01% of average loans outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2006. This compares to net chargeoffs of $1.1 million or 0.08% of average loans outstanding for the same period in 2005. We continue to record loss provisions to compensate for both the sustained growth of our loan portfolio and our continued lending focus on increasing our portfolio of commercial real estate, commercial business, including trade finance, and construction loans.
The following table summarizes activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:
42
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Allowance balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
75,847 |
|
$ |
55,723 |
|
$ |
68,635 |
|
$ |
50,884 |
|
Allowance from acquisition |
|
|
|
9,290 |
|
4,084 |
|
9,290 |
|
||||
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit |
|
(119 |
) |
(973 |
) |
(1,398 |
) |
(1,834 |
) |
||||
Provision for loan losses |
|
3,500 |
|
4,500 |
|
8,166 |
|
13,370 |
|
||||
Chargeoffs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Commercial business |
|
148 |
|
1,252 |
|
439 |
|
4,720 |
|
||||
Automobile |
|
|
|
42 |
|
45 |
|
86 |
|
||||
Other consumer |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
24 |
|
3 |
|
||||
Total chargeoffs |
|
152 |
|
1,297 |
|
508 |
|
4,809 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Residential, single family |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
23 |
|
||||
Multifamily real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
||||
Commercial business |
|
12 |
|
140 |
|
105 |
|
346 |
|
||||
Automobile |
|
3 |
|
31 |
|
5 |
|
69 |
|
||||
Other consumer |
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
||||
Total recoveries |
|
20 |
|
171 |
|
117 |
|
513 |
|
||||
Net chargeoffs |
|
132 |
|
1,126 |
|
391 |
|
4,296 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Allowance balance, end of period |
|
$ |
79,096 |
|
$ |
67,414 |
|
$ |
79,096 |
|
$ |
67,414 |
|
Average loans outstanding |
|
$ |
8,166,068 |
|
$ |
5,935,822 |
|
$ |
7,660,145 |
|
$ |
5,582,437 |
|
Total gross loans outstanding, end of period |
|
$ |
8,447,766 |
|
$ |
6,626,108 |
|
$ |
8,447,766 |
|
$ |
6,626,108 |
|
Annualized net chargeoffs to average loans |
|
0.01 |
% |
0.08 |
% |
0.01 |
% |
0.10 |
% |
||||
Allowance for loan losses to total gross loans at the end of period |
|
0.94 |
% |
1.02 |
% |
0.94 |
% |
1.02 |
% |
Prior to the third quarter of 2005, we utilized two primary methodologies to determine the overall adequacy of the allowance the classification migration model and the individual loan review analysis methodology. The results from these two methodologies were compared to various ancillary analyses, including historical loss analyses, peer group comparisons, and analyses based on the federal regulatory interagency policy for loan and lease losses to determine an overall allowance requirement amount. Largely in response to the significant growth of the Banks loan portfolio in the past couple of years, we refined the classification migration analysis in the third quarter of 2005 to take into consideration the increasing diversity and risk profiles of loans within the same loan categories. As a result of our enhanced approach to the classification migration analysis, management has determined that the individual loan review analysis methodology and separate historical loss analyses are no longer necessary in determining the overall adequacy of the allowance since the results of these analyses have been incorporated into the enhanced migration model.
Under the classification migration approach implemented prior to the third quarter of 2005, we utilized only six risk-rated loan pools. This now has been expanded to eighteen categories. Automobile loans and homogeneous loans, which are predominantly consumer-related credits (i.e. home equity lines, overdraft protection, and credit card loans), remain unchanged under the enhanced model. All other categories (i.e. single
43
family residential, multifamily residential, commercial real estate, construction, and commercial business) have been broken down into additional subcategories. For example, instead of one commercial real estate loan category, this category has been segmented into six subcategories based on industry sector, namely, retail, office, industrial, land, hotel/motel, and other miscellaneous. By sectionalizing loan categories into smaller subgroups, we are better able to isolate and identify the risk associated with each subgroup based on historical loss trends.
In addition to increasing the number of loan categories, we have also expanded the loss horizon from five to thirteen years in order to better capture the Banks historical loss trends to make the analysis more complete and accurate. The thirteen-year loss horizon was selected because this represents the timeframe when the Bank started to monitor and track losses incurred in the loan portfolio. We continue to utilize minimum loss rates as a self-correcting mechanism to better reflect the loss potential for certain categories that have little or no historical losses. Similar to the previous periods, minimum loss rates are established based on relative risk profiles for certain loan categories. However, in contrast to previous periods, the current minimum loss rates utilized under the enhanced methodology more closely reflect historical loss rates than previously utilized minimum loss rates as a result of the expanded loss horizon. Commencing in the third quarter of 2006, we have set an upper limit of 25 basis points as the maximum differential between historical loss rates and minimum loss rates for loans with a pass rating in all loan categories. The allowance requirement for each pool continues to be based on the higher of historical loss factors or established minimum loss rates for each classification category (i.e. pass, special mention, substandard, and doubtful). Also during the third quarter of 2006, we made changes in the loan grade definitions for the Watch II (included in the Pass category) and Special Mention classification categories. As a result of this change, there is an increase in criticized loans for certain loan categories as of September 30, 2006 relative to year-end 2005.
Besides quantitative adjustments, the enhanced classification migration methodology also utilizes qualitative adjustments which were previously considered in conjunction with the individual loan review analysis methodology. These qualitative adjustments include, but are not limited to, credit concentrations, delinquency, nonaccrual and problem loan trends, qualification of lending management and staff, and quality of the loan review system. Qualitative adjustments can either be positive or negative, and generally range from -2% to 5%. Total net qualitative adjustments for each loan pool are reflected as a percent adjustment and are calculated on top of the required allowance amount based on historical losses or minimum loss rates. By incorporating various qualitative adjustments into the migration methodology, we have essentially integrated the principles of the individual loan review analysis methodology.
Previously, we used a 10% estimation risk factor to compensate for the modeling risk associated with the classification migration and individual loan review analysis models. Additionally, we also used a 5% economic risk factor in consideration of the tenuous state of the national economy, recent corporate scandals, continuing geopolitical instability in the Middle East, and the unfavorable impact of Fed rate increases on consumer cash flows. With the enhanced migration model, both the estimation and economic risk factors are included in the qualitative adjustments for each loan category. Although a certain degree of subjectivity is still inevitable in determining the adequacy of the loan loss allowance, it is managements opinion that the new expanded classification migration method is more accurate in assessing the allowance requirement for each loan subcategory.
44
The following table reflects managements allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category and the ratio of each loan category to total loans as of the dates indicated:
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||
Residential, single family |
|
$ |
2,423 |
|
7.3 |
% |
$ |
1,401 |
|
7.5 |
% |
Residential, multifamily |
|
9,711 |
|
20.4 |
% |
5,152 |
|
18.3 |
% |
||
Commercial and industrial real estate |
|
26,966 |
|
44.9 |
% |
22,241 |
|
48.9 |
% |
||
Construction |
|
8,637 |
|
12.0 |
% |
10,751 |
|
9.4 |
% |
||
Commercial business |
|
15,502 |
|
10.1 |
% |
13,452 |
|
9.5 |
% |
||
Trade finance |
|
15,178 |
|
3.2 |
% |
14,680 |
|
3.4 |
% |
||
Automobile |
|
92 |
|
0.1 |
% |
205 |
|
0.1 |
% |
||
Other consumer |
|
587 |
|
2.0 |
% |
753 |
|
2.9 |
% |
||
Total |
|
$ |
79,096 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
68,635 |
|
100.0 |
% |
Loss reserves on single family loans increased $1.0 million, or 73%, to $2.4 million due primarily to an increase in criticized (i.e. rated special mention) and classified (i.e. rated substandard or doubtful) single family loans at September 30, 2006 in comparison to year-end 2005 levels. Specifically, criticized and classified single family loans amounted to $196 thousand and $4.5 million, respectively, at September 30, 2006. In comparison, there were no criticized or classified single family loans at December 31, 2005. Additionally, the volume of single family loans increased 21% at September 30, 2006 relative to December 31, 2005.
Loss reserves on multifamily loans increased $4.6 million, or 88%, to $9.7 million at September 30, 2006 partly due to a 39% increase in the volume of multifamily loans at September 30, 2006 from year-end 2005 levels. Further contributing to the increase in loss allowances on multifamily loans is an increase in criticized and classified loans at September 30, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005. Specifically, multifamily loans rated special mention and substandard increased to $19.7 million and $4.2 million, respectively, at September 30, 2006. This compares to $3.7 million and $2.0 million in special mention and substandard multifamily loans at December 31, 2005.
Loss reserves on commercial real estate loans increased $4.7 million, or 21%, to $27.0 million at September 30, 2006 partly due to a 14% increase in the volume of commercial real estate loans at September 30, 2006 relative to year-end 2005 levels. The increase in loss reserves for this loan category can also be attributed to an increase in loans rated special mention to $58.8 million at September 30, 2006, compared to $28.9 million at December 31, 2005. The large increase in special mention loans in this category at September 30, 2006 came primarily from the retail and land sectors and resulted from loan grade definition changes in the Watch II and Special Mention classification categories implemented during the third quarter of 2006. Commercial real estate loans rated substandard also increased to $13.5 million as of September 30, 2006, from $8.9 million as of December 31, 2005, further contributing to the increase in reserves for this category.
Loss reserves on construction loans decreased $2.1 million, or 20%, to $8.6 million at September 30, 2006 despite a 58% increase in the volume of loans in this category when compared to December 31, 2005. The decline in loss reserves for this category is predominantly due to the downward adjustment in minimum loss rates established for loans rated pass. As previously mentioned, the differential between minimum loss rates and historical loss rates was capped at 25 basis points for the pass classification category commencing in the third quarter of 2006 to bring these two ratios more in line with each other. Partially offsetting the impact of
45
this minimum loss rate adjustment for pass loans is an increase in residential construction loans rated special mention which climbed to $68.5 million at September 30, 2006, compared to only $5.0 million at December 31, 2005. The large increase in special mention loans in this category at September 30, 2006 is also a result of loan grade definition changes in the Watch II and Special Mention classification categories implemented during the third quarter of 2006. There were no criticized or classified construction loans on commercial properties at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. Residential construction loans represented 66% of the total construction loan portfolio at September 30, 2006, with the remaining 34% comprised of commercial construction loans.
Loss reserves on commercial business loans increased $2.1 million, or 15%, to $15.5 million at September 30, 2006 partly due to a 33% increase in the volume of loans in this category at September 30, 2006 relative to year-end 2005. This loan growth is compounded by an increase in criticized loans to $47.5 million as of September 30, 2006, compared to only $5.3 million as of December 31, 2005. The large increase in criticized loans at September 30, 2006 resulted from changes in loan grade definitions for the Watch II and Special Mention classification categories implemented during the third quarter of 2006. Partially offsetting these factors is a downward adjustment in the minimum loss rates established on commercial business loans rated pass to be more in line with historical losses in this portfolio.
Loss reserves on trade finance loans increased $498 thousand, or 3%, to $15.2 million at September 30, 2006, due to a 16% increase in the volume of loans in this category at September 30, 2006 relative to year-end 2005 as well as an increase in criticized and classified loans at September 30, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005. Specifically, loans rated special mention and substandard totaled $10.3 million and $5.1 million at September 30, 2006, respectively, compared to only $2.0 million and $1.3 million at December 31, 2005, respectively. These factors were partially offset by a decline in the historical loss rate in this portfolio to 3.18% at September 30, 2006, compared to 3.75% at December 31, 2005.
Loss reserves on automobile loans decreased $113 thousand, or 55%, to $92 thousand as of September 30, 2006, despite a 13% increase in the volume of loans in this category at September 30, 2006 relative to December 31, 2005. The decline in required loss reserves for this loan category is due to the downward adjustment in established minimum loss rates for the pass category at September 30, 2006, compared to December 31, 2005. As previously mentioned, the minimum loss rate adjustment for all loan categories was capped at 25 basis points commencing in the third quarter of 2006.
Loss reserves on consumer loans decreased $166 thousand, or 22%, to $587 thousand as of September 30, 2006, primarily due to the 19% decrease in the volume of consumer loans at September 30, 2006 relative to year-end 2005. Consumer loans are comprised predominantly of home equity loans and home equity lines of credit, and to a lesser extent, credit card and overdraft protection lines.
Deposits
Deposits increased 13% to $7.10 billion at September 30, 2006, from $6.26 billion at December 31, 2005, largely due to $728.5 million in deposits acquired from Standard Bank. Deposit growth was comprised of increases in time deposits of $648.8 million or 21%, money market accounts of $177.2 million or 18%, savings accounts of $68.7 million or 21%, and noninterest-bearing demand deposits of $21.2 million or 2%. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in interest-bearing checking accounts of $74.9 million or 16%. The acquisition of Standard Bank accounted for the large increase in time deposits, with their time deposit base comprising 74% of their total deposit portfolio. Core deposits, or non-time deposit accounts, amounted to $3.30 billion at September 30, 2006, representing 47% of total deposits, with time deposits representing the remaining 53%. This is comparable to the 50% core deposit ratio at year-end 2005.
46
The following table sets forth the composition of the deposit portfolio as of the dates indicated:
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
1,353,195 |
|
$ |
1,331,992 |
|
Interest-bearing checking |
|
397,711 |
|
472,611 |
|
||
Money market |
|
1,155,925 |
|
978,678 |
|
||
Savings |
|
395,508 |
|
326,806 |
|
||
Total core deposits |
|
3,302,339 |
|
3,110,087 |
|
||
Time deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Less than $100,000 |
|
1,101,132 |
|
927,793 |
|
||
$100,000 or greater |
|
2,696,205 |
|
2,220,707 |
|
||
Total time deposits |
|
3,797,337 |
|
3,148,500 |
|
||
Total deposits |
|
$ |
7,099,676 |
|
$ |
6,258,587 |
|
We utilize a combination of short-term and long-term borrowings to manage our liquidity position. Federal funds purchased generally mature within one to three business days from the transaction date. At September 30, 2006, federal funds purchased amounted to $118.0 million, a 29% increase from the $91.5 million balance at December 31, 2005. FHLB advances increased 143% to $1.50 billion as of September 30, 2006, compared to $617.7 million at December 31, 2005. A large portion of outstanding FHLB advances at September 30, 2006 totaling $670.0 million represents overnight advances, compared to $280.0 million as of December 31, 2005. In January 2006, we entered into $50.0 million in term FHLB advances with 3-year maturity terms at a fixed rate of 4.66%. These advances were made in connection with our community reinvestment initiatives. During March 2006, we assumed $70.0 million in term FHLB advances from Standard Bank with original maturity terms ranging from 15 months to 10 years and fixed interest rates ranging from 4.01% to 5.71%. To help fund our robust loan origination activity, we entered into $400.0 million in additional term FHLB advances during the third quarter of 2006. These advances have maturity terms ranging from 28 months to five years and fixed rates ranging from 4.89% to 5.42%.
In addition to federal funds purchased and FHLB advances, we have outstanding securities sold under repurchase agreements totaling $825.0 million at September 30, 2006. This compares to $325.0 million in outstanding repurchase agreements at December 31, 2005. Repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and recorded at the amounts at which the securities were sold. The collateral for these agreements consist of U.S. Government agency and U.S. Government sponsored enterprise debt and mortgage-backed securities. The increase in repurchase agreements at September 30, 2006 is due to three separate issuances of additional repurchase agreements totaling $500.0 million during 2006. The first transaction, amounting to $200.0 million, has an effective date of April 25, 2006 and a maturity date of April 25, 2016. The interest rate is initially floating for the first two years from April 25, 2006 through April 25, 2008 based on the three-month Libor minus 125 basis points. Thereafter, the rate is fixed at 5.128% for the remainder of the term. As of September 30, 2006, the interest rate on this agreement is 4.235%. The counterparty has the right to call the transaction on April 25, 2008 and quarterly thereafter until maturity. The second transaction, also amounting to $200.0 million, has an effective date of June 6, 2006 and a maturity date of June 6, 2013. The
47
interest rate is initially floating for the first six months from June 6, 2006 through December 6, 2006 based on the three-month Libor minus 255 basis points. Thereafter, the rate is fixed at 5.00% for the remainder of the term. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate on this agreement is 2.84%. The counterparty has the right to call the transaction on December 6, 2006 and quarterly thereafter until maturity. The third transaction, amounting to $100.0 million, has an effective date of September 7, 2006 and a maturity date of September 7, 2016. The interest rate is initially floating for the first nine months from September 7, 2006 through June 7, 2007 based on the three-month Libor minus 340 basis points. Thereafter, the rate is fixed at 4.7775% for the remainder of the term. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate on this agreement is 1.99%. The counterparty has the right to call the transaction on June 7, 2007 and quarterly thereafter until maturity.
During the second quarter of 2006, we also modified the terms of a $50.0 million repurchase agreement that we initially entered into in September 2005 in response to the rising interest rate environment. Under the original terms of this seven-year agreement, the interest rate for the first year was based on the three-month Libor minus 100 basis points. Thereafter, the rate was fixed at 4.075% through the original maturity date of September 6, 2012. Under the modified terms, the interest rate on this instrument for the period from June 6, 2006 through December 6, 2006 is based on the three-month Libor minus 290 basis points. Thereafter, the rate is fixed at 5.00% through the extended maturity date of June 6, 2013. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate on this repurchase agreement is 2.49%. Under the terms of the modification, the counterparty has the right to call the transaction on December 6, 2006 and quarterly thereafter until maturity. The difference in the present value of the cash flows under the new terms of the debt instrument is less than 10% of the present value of the remaining cash flows under the original terms. As such, this modification of debt terms is not considered substantial, and therefore, does not constitute as debt extinguishment in accordance with the provisions of EITF 96-19, Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments. No gain or loss was recorded in the consolidated statements of income as a result of this debt modification.
As of September 30, 2006, long-term debt totaled $184.0 million, compared to $153.1 million at December 31, 2005. Long-term debt is comprised of subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt issued in connection with our various trust preferred securities offerings. The increase in long-term debt at September 30, 2006 is due to the issuance of $30.9 million in junior subordinated debt securities through a pooled trust preferred offering. Similar to previous offerings, these securities were issued through a newly formed statutory business trust, East West Capital Trust VII, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The securities have a 30-year maturity and bear interest at a per annum rate based on the three-month Libor plus 135 basis points, payable on a quarterly basis.
The following table presents, as of September 30, 2006, the Companys significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations, within the categories described below, by payment date. These contractual obligations, except for the operating lease obligations, are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. The payment amounts represent the amounts and interest contractually due to the recipient.
48
|
|
Payment Due by Period |
|
||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations |
|
Less than |
|
1-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
After |
|
Indeterminate |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Deposits |
|
$ |
3,784,434 |
|
$ |
143,477 |
|
$ |
105,959 |
|
$ |
86,002 |
|
$ |
3,302,340 |
|
$ |
7,422,212 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
118,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,049 |
|
||||||
FHLB advances |
|
805,323 |
|
614,803 |
|
172,942 |
|
8,638 |
|
|
|
1,601,706 |
|
||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
29,556 |
|
59,112 |
|
59,112 |
|
934,061 |
|
|
|
1,081,841 |
|
||||||
Notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,460 |
|
6,460 |
|
||||||
Long-term debt obligations |
|
13,583 |
|
27,165 |
|
27,165 |
|
396,450 |
|
|
|
464,363 |
|
||||||
Operating lease obligations |
|
9,052 |
|
15,207 |
|
11,423 |
|
28,446 |
|
|
|
64,128 |
|
||||||
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
4,759,997 |
|
$ |
859,764 |
|
$ |
376,601 |
|
$ |
1,453,597 |
|
$ |
3,308,800 |
|
$ |
10,758,759 |
|
A schedule of significant commitments at September 30, 2006 follows:
|
Payment Due |
|
||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Undisbursed loan commitments |
|
$ |
2,250,589 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
398,095 |
|
|
Commercial letters of credit |
|
50,876 |
|
|
Our primary source of capital is the retention of net after tax earnings. At September 30, 2006, stockholders equity totaled $981.4 million, a 34% increase from $734.1 million as of December 31, 2005. The increase is comprised of the following: (1) net income of $104.3 million recorded during the first nine months of 2006; (2) stock compensation costs amounting to $4.2 million related to grants of restricted stock and stock options; (3) tax benefits of $9.9 million resulting from the exercise of nonqualified stock options; (4) tax benefits of $576 thousand resulting from the vesting of restricted stock; (5) net issuance of common stock totaling $8.4 million, representing 907,320 shares, pursuant to various stock plans and agreements; and (6) net issuance of common stock totaling $133.9 million, representing 3,647,440 shares, in connection with the Standard Bank acquisition. These transactions were offset by (1) payments of quarterly cash dividends totaling $8.9 million and (2) an increase of $5.3 million in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities.
As previously mentioned, we reduced additional paid-in capital in the amount of $8.2 million, representing the remaining deferred compensation balance in the consolidated statement of stockholders equity as of January 1, 2006. The transaction was recorded in accordance with the transition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) which we adopted on January 1, 2006.
On March 15, 2006, the Company issued $30.9 million in junior subordinated debt securities through a pooled trust preferred offering. Similar to previous offerings, these securities were issued through a newly formed statutory business trust, Trust VII, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The proceeds from the debt securities are loaned by Trust VII to the Company and are included in long-term debt in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. The securities issued by Trust VII have a scheduled maturity of June 15, 2036 and bear interest at a per annum rate based on the three-month Libor plus 135 basis points, payable on a quarterly basis. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate on the junior subordinated debt was 6.74%. The junior subordinated debt issued qualifies as Tier I capital for regulatory reporting purposes.
49
Our management is committed to maintaining capital at a level sufficient to assure our shareholders, our customers, and our regulators that our company and our bank subsidiary are financially sound. We are subject to risk-based capital regulations adopted by the federal banking regulators in January 1990. These guidelines are used to evaluate capital adequacy and are based on an institutions asset risk profile and off-balance sheet exposures. According to the regulations, institutions whose Tier 1 and total capital ratios meet or exceed 6% and 10%, respectively, are deemed to be well-capitalized. At September 30, 2006, the Banks Tier 1 and total capital ratios were 9.1% and 10.9%, respectively, compared to 8.8% and 11.0%, respectively, at December 31, 2005.
The following table compares East West Bancorp, Inc.s and East West Banks actual capital ratios at September 30, 2006 to those required by regulatory agencies for capital adequacy and well-capitalized classification purposes:
|
East West |
|
East West |
|
Minimum |
|
Well |
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|
11.0 |
% |
10.9 |
% |
8.0 |
% |
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|
9.2 |
% |
9.1 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
6.0 |
% |
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |
|
8.2 |
% |
8.1 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
5.0 |
% |
ASSET LIABILITY AND MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
Liquidity
Liquidity management involves our ability to meet cash flow requirements arising from fluctuations in deposit levels and demands of daily operations, which include funding of securities purchases, providing for customers credit needs and ongoing repayment of borrowings. Our liquidity is actively managed on a daily basis and reviewed periodically by the Asset/Liability Committee and the Board of Directors. This process is intended to ensure the maintenance of sufficient funds to meet our liquidity needs, including adequate cash flow for off-balance sheet instruments.
Our primary sources of liquidity are derived from financing activities which include the acceptance of customer and broker deposits, federal funds facilities, repurchase agreement facilities and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. These funding sources are augmented by payments of principal and interest on loans, the routine liquidation of securities from the available-for-sale portfolio and securitizations of eligible loans. Primary uses of funds include withdrawal of and interest payments on deposits, originations and purchases of loans, purchases of investment securities, and payment of operating expenses.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we experienced net cash inflows from operating activities of $77.8 million, compared to net cash inflows of $103.8 million for the first nine months of 2005. Net cash inflows from operating activities for the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 were primarily due to net income earned during the period. A net increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets amounting to $30.1 million partially offset net income earned during the first nine months of 2006.
Net cash outflows from investing activities totaled $1.54 billion and $897.1 million for the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net cash outflows from investing activities for both periods can be attributed primarily to the growth in our loan portfolio and purchases of available-for-sale securities. These
50
activities were partially offset by repayments, maturities, redemptions and net sales proceeds from investment securities.
We experienced net cash inflows from financing activities of $1.49 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, primarily due to net proceeds from securities sold under repurchase agreements and FHLB advances, as well as deposit growth. During the same period in 2005, deposit growth, proceeds from federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements, and the issuance of long-term debt largely accounted for net cash inflows from financing activities totaling $837.1 million.
As a means of augmenting our liquidity sources, we have established federal funds lines with six correspondent banks and several master repurchase agreements with major brokerage companies. At September 30, 2006, our available borrowing capacity includes $252.0 million in federal funds line facilities, $121.1 million in repurchase arrangements, and $1.72 billion in unused FHLB advances. We believe our liquidity sources to be stable and adequate. At September 30, 2006, we are not aware of any information that was reasonably likely to have a material effect on our liquidity position.
The liquidity of East West Bancorp, Inc. is primarily dependent on the payment of cash dividends by its subsidiary, East West Bank, subject to limitations imposed by the Financial Code of the State of California. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, total dividends paid by East West Bank to East West Bancorp, Inc. amounted to $8.9 million and $7.9 million respectively. As of September 30, 2006, approximately $229.2 million of undivided profits of East West Bank were available for dividends to East West Bancorp, Inc.
Our success is largely dependent upon our ability to manage interest rate risk, which is the impact of adverse fluctuations in interest rates on our net interest income and net portfolio value. Although in the normal course of business we manage other risks, such as credit and liquidity risk, we consider interest rate risk to be our most significant market risk and could potentially have the largest material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The fundamental objective of the asset liability management process is to manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations while maintaining adequate levels of liquidity and capital. Our strategy is formulated by the Asset/Liability Committee, which coordinates with the Board of Directors to monitor our overall asset and liability composition. The Committee meets regularly to evaluate, among other things, the sensitivity of our assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the book and market values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses on our available-for-sale portfolio, purchase and securitization activity, and maturities of investments and borrowings.
Our overall strategy is to monitor the adverse impact of immediate incremental changes in market interest rates (rate shock) on net interest income and net portfolio value. Net portfolio value is defined as the present value of assets, minus the present value of liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments. The attainment of this goal requires a balance between profitability, liquidity and interest rate risk exposure. To minimize the adverse impact of changes in market interest rates, we simulate the effect of instantaneous interest rate changes on net interest income and net portfolio value on a monthly basis. The table below shows the estimated impact of changes in interest rates on our net interest income and market value of equity as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, assuming a parallel shift of 100 to 200 basis points in both directions:
51
|
Net Interest Income |
|
Net Portfolio Value |
|
|||||
Change in Interest Rates |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
+200 |
|
1.9 |
% |
1.1 |
% |
(4.9 |
)% |
(12.5 |
)% |
+100 |
|
1.6 |
% |
0.9 |
% |
(2.1 |
)% |
(5.2 |
)% |
-100 |
|
(2.0 |
)% |
(1.6 |
)% |
(3.0 |
)% |
2.9 |
% |
-200 |
|
(3.8 |
)% |
(4.1 |
)% |
(7.1 |
)% |
3.8 |
% |
(1) The percentage change represents net interest income for twelve months in a stable interest rate environment versus net interest income in the various rate scenarios.
(2) The percentage change represents net portfolio value of the Bank in a stable interest rate environment versus net portfolio value in the various rate scenarios.
All interest-earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and related derivative contracts are included in the interest rate sensitivity analysis at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, our estimated changes in net interest income and net portfolio value were within the ranges established by the Board of Directors.
Our primary analytical tool to gauge interest rate sensitivity is a simulation model used by many major banks and bank regulators, and is based on the actual maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The model attempts to predict changes in the yields earned on assets and the rates paid on liabilities in relation to changes in market interest rates. As an enhancement to the primary simulation model, prepayment assumptions and market rates of interest provided by independent broker/dealer quotations, an independent pricing model and other available public sources are incorporated into the model. Adjustments are made to reflect the shift in the Treasury and other appropriate yield curves. The model also factors in projections of anticipated activity levels by Bank product line and takes into account our increased ability to control rates offered on deposit products in comparison to our ability to control rates on adjustable-rate loans tied to the published indices.
The following table provides the outstanding principal balances and the weighted average interest rates of our financial instruments as of September 30, 2006. The information presented below is based on the repricing date for variable rate instruments and the expected maturity date for fixed rate instruments.
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
||||||||
|
|
Expected Maturity or Repricing Date by Year |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Year 1 |
|
Year 2 |
|
Year 3 |
|
Year 4 |
|
Year 5 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Federal funds sold |
|
$ |
13,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,500 |
|
$ |
13,500 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
$ |
102,574 |
|
||||
Weighted average rate |
|
7.00 |
% |
8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale (fixed rate) |
|
$ |
690,185 |
|
$ |
39,491 |
|
$ |
69,491 |
|
$ |
49,490 |
|
$ |
134,490 |
|
$ |
34,740 |
|
$ |
1,017,887 |
|
$ |
1,016,239 |
|
Weighted average rate |
|
4.65 |
% |
4.35 |
% |
5.36 |
% |
5.20 |
% |
5.77 |
% |
5.42 |
% |
4.89 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale (variable rate) (1) |
|
$ |
431,970 |
|
$ |
31,091 |
|
$ |
15,100 |
|
$ |
6,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
484,823 |
|
$ |
473,873 |
|
||
Weighted average rate |
|
5.13 |
% |
3.84 |
% |
3.86 |
% |
4.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total gross loans |
|
$ |
5,708,688 |
|
$ |
976,891 |
|
$ |
847,955 |
|
$ |
508,993 |
|
$ |
232,851 |
|
$ |
172,388 |
|
$ |
8,447,766 |
|
$ |
8,611,241 |
|
Weighted average rate |
|
7.98 |
% |
6.36 |
% |
6.37 |
% |
6.44 |
% |
6.71 |
% |
6.27 |
% |
7.47 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Checking accounts |
|
$ |
397,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
397,711 |
|
$ |
397,711 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
1.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.49 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Money market accounts |
|
$ |
1,155,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,155,925 |
|
$ |
1,155,925 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Savings deposits |
|
$ |
395,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
395,508 |
|
$ |
395,509 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Time deposits |
|
$ |
3,706,067 |
|
$ |
58,147 |
|
$ |
5,925 |
|
$ |
25,184 |
|
$ |
1,371 |
|
$ |
643 |
|
$ |
3,797,337 |
|
$ |
3,781,569 |
|
Weighted average rate |
|
4.47 |
% |
4.28 |
% |
4.17 |
% |
3.05 |
% |
4.40 |
% |
4.47 |
% |
4.46 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
|
$ |
118,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,014 |
|
$ |
118,014 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
FHLB advances (variable rate) |
|
$ |
670,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
670,000 |
|
$ |
670,000 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
5.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.47 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
FHLB term advances (fixed rate) |
|
$ |
96,879 |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
$ |
385,000 |
|
$ |
110,000 |
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
$ |
829,879 |
|
$ |
830,500 |
|
Weighted average rate |
|
2.67 |
% |
5.23 |
% |
5.09 |
% |
5.09 |
% |
5.20 |
% |
4.45 |
% |
4.84 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
825,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
825,000 |
|
$ |
815,121 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Subordinated debt |
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
$ |
82,100 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
6.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.60 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Junior subordinated debt (fixed rate) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,392 |
|
$ |
21,392 |
|
$ |
26,747 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.91 |
% |
10.91 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Junior subordinated debt (variable rate) |
|
$ |
87,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87,631 |
|
$ |
89,878 |
|
|||||
Weighted average rate |
|
7.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.19 |
% |
|
|
(1) Includes hybrid securities that have fixed interest rates for the first three or five years. Thereafter, interest rates become adjustable based on a predetermined index
Expected maturities of assets are contractual maturities adjusted for projected payment based on contractual amortization and unscheduled prepayments of principal as well as repricing frequency. Expected maturities for deposits are based on contractual maturities adjusted for projected rollover rates and changes in pricing for deposits with no stated maturity dates. We utilize assumptions supported by documented analyses for the expected maturities of our loans and repricing of our deposits. We also rely on third party data providers
53
for prepayment projections for amortizing securities. The actual maturities of these instruments could vary significantly if future prepayments and repricing differ from our expectations based on historical experience.
The fair values of short-term investments approximate their book values due to their short maturities. For securities purchased under resale agreements, fair values are calculated by discounting future cash flows based on expected maturities or repricing dates utilizing estimated market discount rates. Bid quotations from securities brokers or third party data providers are the basis for fair values of investment securities available-for-sale. The fair values of loans are estimated for portfolios with similar financial characteristics and take into consideration discounted cash flows based on expected maturities or repricing dates utilizing estimated market discount rates as projected by third party data providers.
Transaction deposit accounts, which include checking, money market and savings accounts, are presumed to have equal book and fair values because the interest rates paid on these accounts are based on prevailing market rates. The fair values of time deposits are based upon the discounted values of contractual cash flows, which are estimated using current rates offered for deposits of similar remaining terms. For federal funds purchased, fair value approximates book value due to their short maturities. The fair value of FHLB advances is estimated by discounting the cash flows through maturity or the next repricing date based on current rates offered by the FHLB for borrowings with similar maturities. The fair values of securities sold under repurchase agreements are calculated by discounting future cash flows based on expected maturities or repricing dates, utilizing estimated market discount rates and taking into consideration the call features of each instrument. For both subordinated and junior subordinated debt instruments, fair values are estimated by discounting cash flows through maturity based on current market rates.
The Asset/Liability Committee is authorized to utilize a wide variety of off-balance sheet financial techniques to assist in the management of interest rate risk. We sometimes use derivative financial instruments as part of our asset and liability management strategy, with the overall goal of minimizing the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our net interest margin and stockholders equity. The use of derivatives has not had a material effect on our operating results or financial position.
In August and November 2004, we entered into four equity swap agreements with a major investment brokerage firm to hedge against market fluctuations in a promotional equity index certificate of deposit product that we offered to Bank customers for a limited time during the latter half of 2004. This product, which has a term of 5 1/2 years, pays interest based on the performance of the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (the HSCEI). The combined notional amounts of the equity swap agreements total $24.6 million with termination dates similar to the stated maturity date on the underlying certificate of deposit host contracts. For the equity swap agreements, we agreed to pay interest based on the one-month Libor minus a spread on a monthly basis and receive any increase in the HSCEI at swap termination date. Under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, a certificate of deposit that pays interest based on changes in an equity index is a hybrid instrument with an embedded derivative (i.e. equity call option) that must be accounted for separately from the host contract (i.e. the certificate of deposit). In accordance with SFAS No. 133, both the embedded equity call options on the certificates of deposit and the freestanding equity swap agreements are marked-to-market every month with resulting changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of income.
On April 1, 2005, the Company amended the four equity swap agreements entered into in 2004 effectively removing the swap payable leg. The amendments to the swap agreements changed the terms of the agreements such that instead of paying interest based on the one-month Libor minus a spread on a monthly basis for the remaining terms of the agreements, we prepaid this amount based on the current market value of the cash streams. The total amount paid in conjunction with these swap agreement amendments was $4.2 million on
54
April 1, 2005. The fair values of both the embedded derivatives and equity swap agreement amounted to $7.8 million and $3.5 million at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The embedded derivatives are included in interest-bearing deposits and the equity swap agreements are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the derivative contracts is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the change in value of the HSCEI based upon the life of the individual swap agreement. The significant increase in the fair value of the derivative contracts since December 31, 2005 can be attributed to a 33% rise in the index value combined with a 21% increase in the implied volatility of the HSCEI call options as of September 30, 2006, relative to year-end 2005.
55
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES OF MARKET RISKS
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding market risks in our portfolio, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations Asset Liability and Market Risk Management.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls during the fiscal quarter covered by the report that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
56
We are not involved in any material legal proceedings. Our subsidiary, East West Bank, from time to time is party to litigation that arises in the ordinary course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the origination and servicing of loans, and other issues related to the business of the Bank. In the opinion of our management, based upon the advice of legal counsel, the resolution of any such issues would not have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
There are no material changes to our risk factors as presented in the Companys 2005 Form 10-K under the heading Item 1A. Risk Factors.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Repurchases of the Companys securities during the third quarter of 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|||
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
Value of Shares that |
|
||
|
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
Purchased as |
|
May Yet Be |
|
||
|
|
of Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
|
||
Month Ended |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
per Share |
|
Announced Programs |
|
the Programs |
|
||
July 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
August 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,000,000 |
|
(1) Excludes 10,043 shares totaling $341 thousand due to forfeitures of restricted stock awards during the third quarter of 2006 pursuant to the Companys 1998 Stock Incentive Plan.
(2) On November 27, 2001, the Companys Board of Directors announced its sixth repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to $7.0 million of its common stock. This repurchase program has no expiration date and, to date, no shares have been purchased under this program.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
57
Not applicable.
(i) Exhibit 31.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(ii) Exhibit 31.2 |
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(iii) Exhibit 32.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(iv) Exhibit 32.2 |
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
All other material referenced in this report which is required to be filed as an exhibit hereto has previously been submitted.
58
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: November 8, 2006 |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
By: |
/s/ Julia Gouw |
|
|
JULIA GOUW |
||
|
Executive Vice President and |
59