For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2005
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2005

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             

 

000-30221

(Commission File number)

 


 

SABA SOFTWARE, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 


 

Delaware   94-3267638

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

2400 Bridge Parkway,

Redwood Shores, CA

  94065-1166
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

 

(650) 696-3840

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

On December 31, 2005 17,953,253 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.001 par value, were outstanding.

 



Table of Contents

SABA SOFTWARE, INC.

FORM 10-Q

 

QUARTER ENDED November 30, 2005

INDEX

 

         Page

Part I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION     

Item 1.

  Financial Statements (Unaudited)    3
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 30, 2005 and May 31, 2005    3
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended November 30, 2005 and 2004    4
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended November 30, 2005 and 2004    5
    Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements    6

Item 2.

  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    12

Item 3.

  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    26

Item 4.

  Controls and Procedures    27
Part II.   OTHER INFORMATION     

Item 1.

  Legal Proceedings    27

Item 1A.

  Risk Factors    27

Item 2.

  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds    27

Item 3.

  Defaults Upon Senior Securities    27

Item 4.

  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders    27

Item 5.

  Other Information    28

Item 6.

  Exhibits    28
SIGNATURES    29


Table of Contents

PART 1: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

SABA SOFTWARE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

 

    

November 30,

2005


   

May 31,

2005


 
ASSETS                 

Current assets:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 13,714     $ 15,408  

Restricted cash

     140       140  

Accounts receivable, net

     13,663       15,187  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     1,915       1,543  
    


 


Total current assets

     29.432       32,278  

Property and equipment, net

     937       874  

Goodwill

     15,164       15,164  

Purchased intangible assets, net

     4,604       4,993  

Other assets

     858       990  
    


 


Total assets

   $ 50,995     $ 54,299  
    


 


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                 

Current liabilities:

                

Accounts payable

   $ 5,644     $ 4,975  

Accrued compensation and related expenses

     3,326       2,969  

Accrued expenses

     2,201       4,529  

Deferred revenue

     12,574       12,406  

Current portion of debt and lease obligations

     2,093       2,300  

Long-term debt (see Note 6)

     2,464       —    
    


 


Total current liabilities

     28,302       27,179  

Deferred revenue

     513       51  

Accrued rent

     2,816       2,839  

Long-term debt and lease obligations (see Note 6)

     —         3,396  
    


 


Total liabilities

     31,631       33,465  

Stockholders’ equity:

                

Preferred stock, issuable in series: $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 authorized shares, none issued or outstanding

     —         —    

Common stock: $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized and 17,953,253 shares issued and outstanding at November 30, 2005 and 17,884,250 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2005

     73       73  

Additional paid-in capital

     209,752       209,566  

Treasury stock: 102,997 shares held at November 30, 2005 and at May 31, 2005, at cost

     (232 )     (232 )

Accumulated deficit

     (189,919 )     (188,428 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (310 )     (145 )
    


 


Total stockholders’ equity

     19,364       20,834  
    


 


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 50,995     $ 54,299  
    


 


 

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

SABA SOFTWARE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

 

     Three months ended

    Six months ended

 
    

November 30,

2005


   

November 30,

2004


   

November 30,

2005


   

November 30,

2004


 

Revenues:

                                

License

   $ 5,124     $ 3,318     $ 8,520     $ 5,840  

Services

     11,108       7,019       21,340       13,810  
    


 


 


 


Total revenues

     16,232       10,337       29,860       19,650  

Cost of revenues:

                                

Cost of license

     34       97       293       176  

Cost of services

     5,505       3,144       10,547       6,159  

Amortization of acquired developed technology

     —         —         —         2  
    


 


 


 


Total cost of revenues

     5,539       3,241       10,840       6,337  
    


 


 


 


Gross profit

     10,693       7,096       19,020       13,313  
    


 


 


 


Operating expenses:

                                

Research and development

     2,825       2,415       5,583       4,780  

Sales and marketing

     6,093       4,129       11,563       8,466  

General and administrative

     1,337       1,184       2,769       2,316  

Amortization of purchased intangible assets

     170       —         340       —    
    


 


 


 


Total operating expenses

     10,425       7,728       20,255       15,562  
    


 


 


 


Income (loss) from operations

     268       (632 )     (1,235 )     (2,249 )

Interest income (expense) and other, net

     (111 )     (10 )     (222 )     (28 )
    


 


 


 


Income (loss) before provision for income taxes

     157       (642 )     (1,457 )     (2,277 )

Provision for income taxes

     (26 )     (40 )     (34 )     (82 )
    


 


 


 


Net income (loss)

   $ 131     $ (682 )   $ (1,491 )   $ (2,359 )
    


 


 


 


Basic net income (loss) per share

   $ 0.01     $ (0.04 )   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.16 )
    


 


 


 


Diluted net income (loss) per share

   $ 0.01     $ (0.04 )   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.16 )
    


 


 


 


Shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per share

     17,523       16,107       17,407       15,061  
    


 


 


 


Shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share

     18,082       16,107       17,407       15,061  
    


 


 


 


 

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

SABA SOFTWARE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Six months ended

 
    

November 30,

2005


   

November 30,

2004


 

Operating activities:

                

Net loss

   $ (1,491 )   $ (2,359 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

                

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment

     245       500  

Amortization of purchased intangible assets and acquired developed technology

     390       2  

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

     6       —    

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

                

Accounts receivable

     1,358       (3,823 )

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     (372 )     (27 )

Other assets

     131       126  

Accounts payable

     669       (156 )

Accrued expenses

     (1,868 )     (1,003 )

Accrued rent

     (24 )     49  

Deferred revenue

     630       (141 )
    


 


Net cash used in operating activities

     (326 )     (6,832 )

Investing activities:

                

Proceeds from redemptions and maturities of short-term investments

     —         150  

Purchases of property and equipment

     (337 )     (301 )

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

     24       —    
    


 


Net cash used in investing activities

     (313 )     (151 )

Financing activities:

                

Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock plans

     187       97  

Proceeds from issuance of common stock in private placement, net of issuance costs

     —         8,669  

Borrowings, under credit facility, net of issuance costs

     —         270  

Repayments on borrowings under credit facility

     (1,206 )     (3,832 )

Repayments on note payable

     (36 )     (34 )

Principal payments under capital lease obligations

     —         (11 )
    


 


Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

     (1,055 )     5,159  
    


 


Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     (1,694 )     (1,824 )

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     15,408       16,628  
    


 


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 13,714     $ 14,804  
    


 


 

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

SABA SOFTWARE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

 

1. Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Saba Software, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (“Saba”) and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state Saba’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of and for the dates and periods presented.

 

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Saba’s audited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Saba’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 29, 2005. The results of operations for the three and six months ended November 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year ending May 31, 2006 or for any future period.

 

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepts in the United States have been condensed or omitted. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at May 31, 2005 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date.

 

2. Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share

 

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share information for all periods is presented under the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” Basic net income (loss) per share has been computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less the weighted-average number of shares that may be repurchased. Basic earnings per share excludes any dilutive effects of stock options as well as any contingently issuable shares. (Contingently issuable shares are shares that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period.)

 

Diluted net income per share for the three months ended November 30, 2005 is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding, plus shares of potential common stock. Potential common stock includes shares of common stock which are issuable upon the exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock method, which assumes the Company will buy back its own common stock with proceeds from the option exercises) as well as any contingently issuable shares. For all other periods presented, diluted net loss per share excludes shares of potential common stock since the effect is anti-dilutive.

 

The calculations of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share are as follows (in thousands, except for per share amounts):

 

     Three months ended

    Six months ended

 
     November 30,
2005


   November 30,
2004


    November 30,
2005


    November 30,
2004


 

Net income (loss)

   $ 131    $ (682 )   $ (1,491 )   $ (2,359 )

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding

     17,523      16,109       17,407       15,064  

Weighted-average shares of common stock subject to repurchase

     —        (2 )     —         (3 )
    

  


 


 


Weighted-average shares of common stock used in computing basic net loss per share

     17,523      16,107       17,407       15,061  

Effect of dilutive employee stock options

     144      —         —         —    

Effect of contingently issuable shares

     415      —         —         —    
    

  


 


 


Weighted-average shares of common stock used in computing diluted net loss per share

     18,082      16,107       17,407       15,061  

Basic net income (loss) per share

   $ 0.01    $ (0.04 )   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.16 )
    

  


 


 


Diluted net income (loss) per share

   $ 0.01    $ (0.04 )   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.16 )
    

  


 


 


 

3. Comprehensive Loss

 

Saba reports comprehensive loss in accordance with SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income.” The following table sets forth the calculation of comprehensive loss for all periods presented (in thousands) :

 

     Three months ended

    Six months ended

 
    

November 30,

2005


    November 30,
2004


    November 30,
2005


    November 30,
2004


 

Net income (loss)

   $ 131     $ (682 )   $ (1,491 )   $ (2,359 )

Foreign currency translation gain

     (36 )     49       (165 )     40  

Unrealized loss on investments

     —         —         —         (4 )
    


 


 


 


Comprehensive income (loss)

   $ 95     $ (633 )   $ (1,656 )   $ (2,323 )
    


 


 


 


 

4. Pending Acquisition of Centra Software, Inc.

 

On October 6, 2005 Saba announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Centra Software, Inc. (“Centra”) for a combination of Saba stock and cash. The transaction has been approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies but is subject to stockholder approval and other customary closing conditions. Once approved, the consideration per share to be received by the stockholders of Centra will be $0.663 per share in cash and 0.354 per share in Saba stock for each share of Centra stock held. The total estimated purchase price for Centra of approximately $58.3 million will consist of (i) approximately $19.1 million in cash, (ii) $37.3 million in Saba’s common stock (assuming the issuance of approximately 10.2 million shares of Saba common stock to Centra stockholders), and (iii) acquisition related expenses of approximately $1.8 million, consisting primarily of fees due to financial advisors and other professionals. Separate special meetings of stockholders of both Saba and Centra are expected to be held on January 26, 2006 to vote upon the proposed merger.

 

6


Table of Contents

5. Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

 

Business Combinations

 

On May 5, 2005, Saba acquired THINQ Learning Solutions, Inc. (“THINQ”), a provider of enterprise management solutions.

 

Under the terms of the merger agreement, the aggregate consideration payable by Saba Software, Inc (“the Company”) is 1,700,000 shares of Company common stock and cash of $100,000. The 1,700,000 shares are subject to a post-closing balance sheet adjustment. As of May 31, 2005, approximately 635,000 shares of the Company were held in escrow in connection with this transaction, consisting of approximately 360,000 shares for stockholders indemnification obligations for general liability and approximately 275,000 shares for post-closing balance sheet adjustments including certain accounts receivable. During the quarter ended August 31, 2005, Saba released 220,000 shares from escrow related to cash received on certain accounts receivable. In addition, up to an additional 100,000 shares of Company common stock may be issued in three equal installments over a three-year period pursuant to an earn-out provision that is based on the number of THINQ customers that migrate to the Saba platform. These shares, if issued, will be accounted for in the periods in which they are earned.

 

The THINQ acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values as of May 5, 2005. The total preliminary purchase price was $9.3 million, including acquisition-related transaction costs.

 

The preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based upon a preliminary valuation, and our estimates and assumptions are subject to change upon the finalization of the valuation. We have identified certain pre-acquisition contingencies, but we have yet to conclude whether the fair values for such contingencies are determinable. The primary area of the purchase price allocation that is not yet finalized relates to income taxes related to certain of our acquired foreign subsidiaries. If information becomes available to the Company prior to the end of the purchase price allocation period that would indicate that a liability is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, such liability will be included in the final purchase price allocation and goodwill will be increased.

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired. Goodwill amounts are not amortized, but rather are tested for impairment at least annually. In the event that Saba determines that the value of goodwill has become impaired, the Company will incur an accounting charge for the amount of impairment during the fiscal quarter in which such determination is made. Goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.

 

Purchased Intangible Assets

 

Purchased intangible assets consist of intellectual property, customer base and non-competition agreements acquired as part of a purchase business combination. The intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of three to seven years.

 

There were no additions to intangible assets during the six months ended November 30, 2005. The following table provides a summary as of November 30, 2005 of the carrying amounts of purchased intangible assets that continue to be amortized:

 

     November 30, 2005

    

Gross

Carrying

Amount


  

Accumulated

Amortization


  

Net

Carrying

Amount


     (in thousands)

Customer Backlog

   $ 300    $ 57    $ 243

Customer Relations

     4,750      389      4,361
    

  

  

Total

   $ 5,050    $ 446    $ 4,604
    

  

  

 

Changes to net carrying values for intangible assets for the six months ended November 30, 2005 were as follows:

 

Customer Backlog         

Net carrying value, May 31, 2005

   $ 293  

Amortization expense

     (50 )
    


Net carrying value, November 30, 2005

   $ 243  
Customer Relations         

Net carrying value, May 31, 2005

   $ 4,701  

Amortization expense

     (340 )
    


Net carrying value, November 30, 2005

   $ 4,361  

 

The total expected future amortization related to purchased intangible assets will be approximately $389,000 for the remainder of fiscal 2005 and $779,000, $771,000, $679,000, and $679,000 in fiscal years 2007 through 2010, respectively, and $1.3 million thereafter.

 

7


Table of Contents

SABA SOFTWARE, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

There was no change to goodwill during the first two quarters of either fiscal 2006 or 2005.

 

6. Credit Facility

 

Since August 2002, Saba has maintained a credit facility with a bank. The current credit facility grants Saba access to a revolving line of credit of $250,000, a new equipment term loan of up to $500,000 and a new term loan of up to $4.5 million. Borrowings on the revolving line of credit and new equipment term loan credit facilities may be made through March, 2006.

 

On November 10, 2005, the Company amended the credit facility with the bank. The amended credit facility requires the Company to maintain a minimum balance of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of (a) $11 million as of any fiscal quarter end through May 31, 2006, (b) $10 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter from May 5, 2005 through September 15, 2005 and from December 1, 2005 through May 31, 2006, (c) $8 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter end from September 16, 2005 through November 29, 2005 (d) $9 million at any time during the period from June 1, 2006 through May 31, 2007, and (e) $7.5 million for any date thereafter.

 

As of November 30, 2005, Saba had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving line of credit and was in compliance with all of the covenants related to this credit facility. On January 13, 2006, the Company further amended the credit facility to require the Company to maintain a minimum balance of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of (a) $11 million as of any fiscal quarter end through May 31, 2006, (b) $10 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter from May 5, 2005 through September 15, 2005 and from March 1, 2006 through May 30, 2006, (c) $8 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter end from September 16, 2005 through November 29, 2005, (d) $7.5 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter end from December 1, 2005 through February 27, 2006 (e) $9 million at any time during the period from May 31, 2006 through May 30, 2007, and (f) $7.5 million for any date thereafter.

 

Saba has and expects to continue to comply with the end of quarter cash covenants included in the credit facility. However, because of the variability in timing of accounts payable and accounts receivable within a quarter, the amendments to the credit facility have been and may continue to be necessary for Saba to remain compliant with the intra-quarter cash covenants. As a result of this intra-quarter variability, in the next twelve months Saba may not be compliant with the intra-quarter cash covenant and as a result, all outstanding amounts payable under the credit facility have been classified as a current liability in the accompanying balance sheet.

 

8


Table of Contents

7. Restructuring

 

During fiscal 2004 and prior years, Saba implemented restructuring programs to reduce expenses to align its operations and cost structure with market conditions. The restructuring programs during fiscal 2004 were implemented under the provisions of SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” while the restructuring programs during fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 were implemented under EITF No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” The restructuring programs included worldwide workforce reductions across all functions and consolidation of excess facilities. Workforce reduction charges consist primarily of severance and fringe benefits. A summary of the movements on the restructuring accrual during the six months ended November 30, 2005 is outlined as follows:

 

     Workforce
Reduction
Charges


   Facilities
Related
Charges


    Total

 
     (in thousands)  

Accrual as of May 31, 2005

   $ 22    $ 251     $ 273  

Deductions – cash payments

     —        (86 )     (86 )
    

  


 


Accrual as of August 31, 2005

   $ 22    $ 165     $ 187  
    

  


 


Deductions – cash payments

     —        (77 )     (77 )
    

  


 


Accrual as of November 30, 2005

   $ 22    $ 88     $ 110  
    

  


 


 

It is expected that the remaining workforce reduction payments will be made by the end of fiscal 2006. Amounts related to the excess facility charge will be paid over the remaining lease periods through the end of fiscal 2006.

 

8. Stock Options and Equity Instruments Exchanged for Services

 

Saba accounts for employee stock options using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” while adhering to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure.” The fair value of options, warrants and restricted stock issued for services rendered by non-employees or assets acquired is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. To calculate the expense or asset value, Saba uses either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share had compensation cost for Saba’s stock compensation plans been determined using the fair value method required by SFAS No. 123 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

     Three months ended

    Six months ended

 
     November 30,

    November 30,

 
     2005

    2004

    2005

    2004

 

Net income (loss)

   $ 131     $ (682 )   $ (1,491 )   $ (2,359 )

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

     (983 )     (2,038 )     (1,940 )     (4,654 )
    


 


 


 


Pro forma net loss

   $ (852 )   $ (2,720 )   $ (3,431 )   $ (7,013 )
    


 


 


 


Basic net income (loss) per share

   $ 0.01     $ (0.04 )   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.16 )

Pro forma basic net loss per share

   $ (0.05 )   $ (0.17 )   $ (0.20 )   $ (0.47 )
    


 


 


 


Shares used in calculating basic net income (loss) per share

     17,523       16,107       17,407       15,061  

Diluted net income (loss) per share

   $ 0.01     $ (0.04 )   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.16 )
    


 


 


 


Shares used in calculating diluted net income (loss) per share

     18,082       16,107       17,407       15,061  

Pro forma diluted net (loss) per share

   $ (0.05 )   $ (0.17 )   $ (0.20 )   $ (0.47 )
    


 


 


 


Shares used in calculating pro forma diluted net loss per share

     17,523       16,107       17,407       15,061  

 

9


Table of Contents

The value of stock-based awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model was calculated using the assumptions in the following table:

 

     Three months ended

    Six months ended

 
     November 30,

    November 30,

 
     2005

    2004

    2005

    2004

 

Employee Options


                        

Dividend Yield

   0 %   0 %   0 %   0 %

Volatility

   1.26     1.33     1.29     1.34  

Risk Free rate of interest

   4.42 %   3.25 %   4.42 %   3.25 %

Expected lives of options (in years)

   2.27     2.30     2.29     2.35  
     Three months
ended


    Six months
ended


 
     November 30,

    November 30,

 
     2005

    2004

    2005

    2004

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan


                        

Dividend Yield

   0 %   0 %   0 %   0 %

Volatility

   .96     .76     .96     .76  

Risk Free rate of interest

   3.65 %   2.13 %   3.65 %   2.13 %

Expected lives of purchase option (in years)

   .5     .5     .5     .5  

 

9. Guarantees

 

Saba enters into license agreements that generally provide indemnification for its customers against intellectual property claims. To date, Saba has not incurred any costs as a result of such indemnifications and has not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in its consolidated financial statements.

 

Saba’s license agreements also generally include a warranty that its software products will substantially operate as described in the applicable program documentation for a period of generally 90 days after delivery. To date, Saba has not incurred or accrued any material costs associated with these warranties.

 

10. Segment Information

 

Saba provides software and services that increase business performance through human capital development and management. Since management’s primary form of internal reporting is aligned with the offering of these software products and services, we believe that we operate in one segment for financial reporting purposes.

 

During the second quarter of 2006, one customer accounted for 25% of our revenue. No customer had an account receivable balance of 10% or greater of our total accounts receivable balance as of November 30, 2005.

 

11. Legal Matters

 

In November 2001, a complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against us, certain of our officers and directors, and certain underwriters of our initial public offering. The complaint was purportedly filed on behalf of a class of certain persons who purchased our common stock between April 6, 2000 and December 6, 2000. The complaint alleges violations by us and our officers and directors of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and other related provisions in connection with certain alleged compensation arrangements entered into by the underwriters in connection with the offering. An amended complaint was filed in April 2002. Similar complaints have been filed against hundreds of other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998. The complaints allege that the prospectus and the registration statement for the offering failed to disclose that the underwriters allegedly solicited and received “excessive” commissions from investors and that some investors in the IPO offering agreed with the underwriters to buy additional shares in the aftermarket in order to inflate the price of our stock. The complaints were later consolidated into a single action. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, attorney and expert fees, and other unspecified litigation costs.

 

On July 1, 2002, the underwriter defendants in the consolidated actions moved to dismiss all of the actions, including the action involving us. On July 15, 2002, we, along with other non-underwriter defendants in the coordinated cases, also moved to dismiss the litigation. On February 19, 2003, the Court ruled on the motions. The Court granted our motion to dismiss the claims against us under Rule 10b-5, due to the insufficiency of the allegations against us. The Court also granted the motion of the individual defendants, Bobby Yazdani and Terry Carlitz, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board and our former Chief Financial Officer and a member of our board of directors, to dismiss the claims against them under Rule 10b-5 and Section 20 of the Exchange Act. The motions to dismiss the claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act were denied as to virtually all of the defendants in the consolidated cases, including us.

 

On July 16, 2003, a committee of our board of directors conditionally approved a proposed partial settlement with the plaintiffs in this matter. The settlement would provide, among other things, a release of us and of the individual defendants for the conduct alleged in the action to be wrongful in the amended complaint. We would agree to undertake other responsibilities under the partial settlement, including agreeing to assign away, not assert, or release certain potential claims we may have against our underwriters. Any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is expected to be borne by our insurers.

 

In June 2004, an agreement of settlement was submitted to the Court for preliminary approval. The Court granted the preliminary approval motion on February 15, 2005, subject to certain modifications. On August 31, 2005 the Court issued a preliminary order further approving the modifications to the settlement and certifying the settlement classes. The Court also appointed the notice administrator for the settlement and ordered that notice of the settlement be distributed to all settlement class members by January 15, 2006. The settlement fairness hearing has been set for April 26, 2006. Following the hearing, if the Court determines that the settlement is fair to the class members, the settlement will be approved. There can be no assurance that this proposed settlement will be approved and implemented in its current form, or at all.

 

10


Table of Contents

If the settlement process fails, we intend to dispute these claims and defend the law suit vigorously. However, due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of the litigation. An unfavorable outcome in litigation could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We are also party to various legal disputes and proceedings arising from the ordinary course of general business activities. While, in the opinion of management, resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, the ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain. Were an unfavorable outcome to occur, the impact could be material to us.

 

12. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

On December 16, 2004 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Standards 123R (“SFAS”), Share-Based Payment, which replaces SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation and Accounting Practice Bulletin (“APB”) 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS123R requires that any share based payment made to an employee, including stock options and shares purchased under employee stock purchase plans, is recognized in the financial statements based on fair value. Under the terms of SFAS 123R, the fair value of any equity award is estimated at the grant date and is recognized as compensation cost over the service period for all awards that are subject to a vesting period. SFAS123R requires that fair value be estimated using an option pricing model that takes into account at least the following items: the exercise price, the expected term of the option, the current price of the underlying share, the expected volatility of the price of the underlying share, the expected dividends on the underlying share and the risk free rate of interest.

 

We are required to adopt SFAS 123(R) in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The effects of the adoption of SFAS 123R on our results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon a number of factors, including the number of employee options which may be granted in the future, the future market value and volatility of our stock price, movements in the risk free rate of interest, stock option exercise and forfeiture patterns and the stock option valuation model used to estimate the fair value of each option. As a result of these variables it is not possible at this time to accurately estimate the effect that the adoption of SFAS123R will have on our future results of operations. However, we expect the adoption of FAS 123 (R) to have a material adverse impact on our net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share. Note 8 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Form 10-Q provides an indication of the effects of using one option-pricing model, the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, which was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, on our current results of operations using the assumptions detailed therein to estimate the fair value of employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares upon the results of our operations for the three and six months ended November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2004.

 

On June 7, 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Previously, most voluntary changes in accounting principles required recognition of a cumulative effect adjustment within net income of the period of the change. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however it does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements. We do not believe adoption of SFAS 154 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

On June 29, 2005, the FASB ratified the EITF’s Issue No. 05-06, Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold Improvements. Issue 05-06 provides that the amortization period used for leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or purchased after the inception of a lease be the shorter of (a) the useful life of the assets or (b) a term that includes required lease periods and renewals that are reasonably assured upon the acquisition or the purchase. The provisions of Issue 05-06 are effective on a prospective basis for leasehold improvements purchased or acquired beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. We do not believe the adoption of Issue 05-06 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

11


Table of Contents

ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes contained herein and the information included in our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended May 31, 2005 and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This discussion includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). All statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements for purposes of these provisions, including any statements of the plans and objectives for future operations and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Statements that include the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “believes,” “plans,” “estimates,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology are forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements include:

 

(i) in Part I, Item 1,

 

  statements regarding future amortization related to intangible assets,

 

  statements regarding workforce reduction payments and payments related to the excess facility charge,

 

  statements regarding operation in one segment for financial reporting purposes,

 

  statements regarding the resolution and effect of pending litigation,

 

  statements regarding the effect of recent accounting changes,

 

  statements regarding our compliance with debt covenants and maturities,

 

(ii) in Part I, Item 2,

 

  statements regarding the effect of the ThinQ acquisition and increased support revenues resulting from the acquisition,

 

  statements that the timing of a few large software license transactions can substantially affect quarterly revenue,

 

  our belief that support revenue will continue to grow,

 

  statements regarding continued investment in areas that we believe accelerate growth,

 

  that business conditions may require us to adopt additional restructuring programs,

 

  that many of our customers have not resumed previous levels of expenditures on information technologies,

 

  expectations regarding research and development expenses to increase,

 

  statements regarding the impact of seasonality on operating results,

 

  statements regarding the adequacy of our tax provision,

 

  statements regarding our compliance with debt covenants and maturities,

 

  our anticipation that we will continue to experience long sales cycles,

 

  the sufficiency of our cash resources, credit facilities and cash flows to meet working capital requirements, capital expense and business expansion requirements for at least the next 12 months,

 

  our expectation to derive substantially all of our revenues for the foreseeable future from the licensing of Saba Enterprise Learning and providing related services,

 

  our expectation to derive revenues from new products over the long term,

 

  our expectation to continue to incur non-cash expenses relating to the amortization of purchased intangible assets along with any potential goodwill impairment,

 

  that our operating results will fluctuate significantly in the future,

 

  our expectation to increase our operating expenses,

 

  our expectation to incur losses for the foreseeable future,

 

  statements regarding future restructuring changes,

 

  statements regarding committing time and resources to potential customers,

 

  the impact of SFAS No. 123R and Statement of Position 97-2,

 

  the impact of the adoption of SFAS 154 and Issue 05-06,

 

  statements regarding internal controls over financial reporting,

 

  statements regarding the effect on our business because of loss of key personnel,

 

  statements regarding the effect of our competitors,

 

  statements regarding defects and errors in our products,

 

  our intention to expand our international presence in the future,

 

  statements regarding our inability to develop non-infringing technology or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms,

 

  the effect of a communications systems failure,

 

  statements regarding our dependence on third-party system integrators,

 

  our expectation of continued operating losses and negative cash flow from operations,

 

  our expectations to use cash resources and credit facilities to fund sales and marketing activities, research and development activities and continued operations,

 

  our expectations that our existing capital resources will be sufficient to meet our capital requirements,

 

  our expectation to continue to acquire complementary businesses or technologies,

 

  that the acquisition of THINQ and any future acquisitions would result in the use of significant amounts of cash, potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities, and/or the incurrence of debt,

 

(iii) in Part I, Item 3,

 

    that more of our contracts may be denominated in foreign currency,

 

    statements regarding our compliance with debt covenants and maturities and

 

(iv) in Part II, Item 1,

 

  statements regarding the resolution and effect of pending litigation.

 

These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those projected or assumed in such forward-looking statements. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are incorrect estimates or assumptions, unanticipated adverse results for pending litigation, contraction of the economy and world markets, lack of demand for information technologies from our customers, requirements for increased spending in research and development, unanticipated need for capital for operations, lack of demand for our products, inability to introduce new products and the factors detailed under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors That May Impact Future Operating Results.” All forward-looking statements and risk factors included in this document are made as of the date of this report, based on information available to us as of such date. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or risk factor.

 

12


Table of Contents

Overview

 

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to provide readers with an understanding of the Company. The following are included in our MD&A:

 

    Overview of our Business and Industry;

 

    Critical Accounting Policies;

 

    Results of Operations;

 

    Liquidity and Capital Resources; and

 

    Risk Factors.

 

OVERVIEW OF OUR BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY

 

Business, Principal Products, and Locations

 

We are a leading provider of human capital management solutions, which are designed to increase organizational performance through the implementation of a management system for aligning goals, developing and motivating people and measuring results. Our solutions can help large enterprises to align the workforce around the organization’s business objectives, efficiently manage regulatory compliance, increase sales and channel readiness, accelerate time-to-competency of people across the extended enterprise, increase speed of customer acquisition, shorten time-to-market of new products and increase visibility into organizational performance.

 

We commenced operations in April 1997 and, through March 1998, focused substantially all of our efforts on research activities, developing our products and building our business infrastructure. We shipped our first Saba Learning products and began to generate revenues from software license fees, implementation and consulting services fees and support fees in April 1998. In August 2003, we shipped our generally available version of Saba Performance.

 

On May 5, 2005, we completed the acquisition of THINQ Learning Solutions, Inc. (“THINQ”), a provider of enterprise learning management solutions. Under the terms of the merger agreement, the aggregate consideration payable by us was up to 1,700,000 shares of common stock and the cash portion of the consideration was $100,000. The 1,700,000 shares are subject to a post-closing balance sheet adjustment. In addition, up to an additional 100,000 shares of our common stock may be issued over a three-year period pursuant to an earn-out provision. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at their fair values as of May 5, 2005. The total preliminary purchase price, including acquisition-related transaction costs, was $9.3 million. We believe our acquisition of THINQ supports our long-term strategic direction, strengthens our competitive position in the Human Capital Management market, expands our customer base and provides greater scale to increase our investment in research and development to accelerate innovation and increase stockholder value.

 

Substantially all of our revenues are derived from the sale of perpetual licenses of our software products and related product-support and professional services. Specifically, we license our software solutions in multi-element arrangements that include a combination of our software, product support and/or professional services. To date, a substantial majority of our software license revenue has been derived from Saba Learning. Our license revenue is affected by the strength of general economic and business conditions, as well as customers’ budgetary cycles and the competitive position of our software products. In addition, the sales cycle for our products is long, typically six to 12 months. The timing of a few large software license transactions can substantially affect our quarterly license revenue.

 

Product support includes technical support and future updates for the applicable software product. We typically sell support for an initial period of one year concurrently with the sale of the related software license. After the initial period, support is renewable on an annual basis at the option of the customer. Accordingly, our support revenue depends upon both our sale of additional software licenses and annual renewals of existing support agreements. In addition, we expect support revenue to increase to reflect support provided to an expanded customer base resulting from the THINQ acquisition. As a result of the acquisition, we recorded adjustments totaling $1.4 million to reduce THINQ’s support obligations to its estimated fair value as of May 5, 2005. As former THINQ customers renew these support contracts, we will recognize the full value of the support contracts as deferred revenues and recognize the related revenue ratably over the contract period.

 

The growth rate of support revenue does not necessarily correlate directly to the growth rate of license revenue as the support renewal rate has a greater impact on support revenue as our installed base of customers grows. For example, if license revenues remained constant, support revenue would continue to grow as a result of the incremental support revenue associated with new license sales, assuming renewal rates stayed relatively constant. We believe that support revenue will continue to grow as we anticipate that a substantial majority of our customers, as well as former THINQ customers, will renew their annual contracts and the sale of new software licenses will increase the number of customers that purchase support.

 

Our professional services offerings include (i) implementation services, (ii) education services for our customers regarding how to use our software, and (iii) hosting services that enable customers that separately purchase software licenses to access and use the software on computers operated by or for us. Our implementation and education services are typically initiated and provided to customers that license software directly from us over a period of three to nine months after licensing the software. Accordingly, our implementation and education services revenue varies directly with the levels of license revenue generated from our direct sales organization in the preceding three to nine-month period. In addition, our implementation and education services revenue varies following our commercial release of significant software updates as our customers generally engage our services to assist with the implementation and education of their software upgrade. Although we primarily provide implementation services on a time and materials basis, a significant portion of these services is provided on a fixed fee basis. Hosting services are generally provided pursuant to annual agreements and the associated revenue is recognized ratably over the hosting term.

 

Our corporate headquarters are located in Redwood Shores, California. We have an international presence in India, France, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia through which we conduct various operating activities related to our business. In each of the non-U.S. jurisdictions in which we have subsidiaries, we have employees or consultants engaged in sales and services activities. In the case of our India subsidiary, our employees primarily engage in software development and quality assurance testing activities.

 

Significant Trends and Developments in Our Business

 

Since we commenced operations in 1997 and continuing throughout fiscal 2001, our business grew rapidly. During fiscal 2002 and continuing through the first three quarters of fiscal 2004, our revenues declined as a result of a deterioration in the overall economy and information technology industry. Beginning in the later part of fiscal 2004, many key indicators began to demonstrate signs of an economic recovery. Consistent with these indicators, our business began to improve during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and throughout the first two quarters of fiscal 2006.

 

During fiscal 2004, fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, in response to the global economic slowdown, we implemented restructuring programs to reduce expenses to

 

13


Table of Contents

align our operations and cost structure with market conditions. The restructuring programs included worldwide workforce reductions across all functions and consolidation of excess facilities. Although we do not have any current plans to implement additional restructuring programs, business conditions may require us to reduce or otherwise adjust our workforce or consolidate excess facilities in the future. There were no restructuring programs implemented in fiscal 2005 or in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006.

 

Despite these recent improvements in macro-economic trends, we believe many of our customers have not resumed previous levels of expenditures on information technologies, particularly enterprise software. We attribute this continued level of depressed spending on enterprise software to customers’ concerns regarding the sustainability of the current economic recovery and the current geopolitical environment.

 

In order to achieve profitability, we will need to generate significantly higher revenue and continue to manage our expenses. Our ability to generate higher revenues and achieve profitability depends on many factors, including the demand for our products and services, the level of product and price competition, market acceptance of our new products, general economic conditions and the successful integration of THINQ. In this regard, we continue to invest in areas that we believe can accelerate revenue growth and to manage expenses to align our operations and cost structure with market conditions.

 

On October 6, 2005 we announced that we had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Centra Software, Inc. (“Centra”) for a combination of Saba stock and cash. The transaction has been approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies but is subject to stockholder approval and other customary closing conditions. Once approved, the consideration per share to be received by the stockholders of Centra will be $0.663 per share in cash and 0.354 per share in Saba stock for each share of Centra stock held. The total estimated purchase price for Centra of approximately $58.3 million will consist of (i) approximately $19.1 million in cash, (ii) $37.3 million in Saba’s common stock (assuming the issuance of approximately 10.2 million shares of Saba common stock to Centra stockholders), and (iii) acquisition related expenses of approximately $1.8 million, consisting primarily of fees due to financial advisors and other professionals. Separate special meetings of stockholders of both Saba and Centra are expected to be held on January 26, 2006 to vote upon the proposed merger.

 

14


Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. However, future events are subject to change and the best estimates and judgments routinely require adjustment. While there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates affecting our financial statements, areas that are particularly significant include revenue recognition policies, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the assessment of recoverability of goodwill and purchased intangible assets and restructuring costs. We have reviewed the critical accounting policies described in the following paragraphs with our Audit Committee.

 

Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenues in accordance with the provisions of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions.” Under SOP 97-2, as amended, we recognize revenues when all of the following conditions are met:

 

    persuasive evidence of an agreement exists;

 

    delivery of the product has occurred;

 

    the fee is fixed or determinable; and

 

    collection of these fees is probable.

 

SOP 97-2, as amended, requires revenue earned on software arrangements involving multiple elements to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of the elements. We have analyzed each element in our multiple-element arrangements and determined that we have sufficient vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) to allocate revenues to support, consulting, hosting and education services. Accordingly, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met, revenues from perpetual licenses are recognized upon delivery using the residual method in accordance with SOP 98-9. We limit our assessment of VSOE for each element to either the price charged when the same element is sold separately or the price established by management, having the relevant authority to do so, for an element not yet sold separately.

 

License revenues are generally recognized on delivery if the other conditions of SOP 97-2 are satisfied. We do not grant our resellers the right of return and we do not recognize revenue from resellers until the end-user has been identified. Support revenue is recognized ratably over the support term, typically 12 months, and revenue related to implementation, consulting, education and other services is generally recognized as the services are performed. Although we primarily provide implementation and consulting services on a time and materials basis, a significant portion of these services is provided on a fixed-fee basis. For contracts that involve significant customization and implementation or consulting services that are essential to the functionality of the software, the license and services revenues are recognized over the service delivery period using the percentage-of-completion method. We use labor hours incurred as a percentage of total expected hours as the measure of progress towards completion.

 

We recognize revenue from multiple element arrangements involving licenses and hosting services in accordance with SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as these arrangements are with customers that have separately licensed and taken possession of our software independent of the hosting services. Revenue from our application service provider offerings is recognized under SAB 104, Revenue Recognition, as these arrangements are integrated offerings pursuant to which the customers’ ability to access our software is not separable from the services necessary to operate the software and customers are not allowed to take possession of our software. Revenue from both our hosting services and application service provider offerings are recognized as service arrangements, whereby the revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the arrangement.

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable are recorded net of allowance for doubtful accounts and totaled approximately $13.7 million as of November 30, 2005. The allowance for doubtful accounts, which totaled approximately $279,000 as of November 30, 2005, is based on our assessment of the collectibility of specific customer accounts historical experience and the aging of the accounts receivable. If there is a deterioration of a major customer’s credit worthiness or actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, we may be required to increase the allowance for doubtful accounts.

 

Recoverability of goodwill and purchased intangible assets. We adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” and accordingly, we do not amortize goodwill. We have evaluated our purchased intangible assets and determined that all such assets have determinable lives. Our goodwill balance at November 30, 2005 was $15.2 million, including $9.9 million recorded as a result of our acquisition of THINQ. Amortization of purchased intangible assets was $195,000 and $389,000 for the three and six-month periods of fiscal 2006 and zero dollars and $2,000 for the same periods, respectively, in fiscal 2005. As of November 30, 2005, our net purchased intangible assets balance was $4.6 million and relates entirely to the THINQ acquisition.

 

SFAS No. 142 prescribes a two-phase process for impairment testing of goodwill. The first phase screens for impairment; while the second phase, if necessary, measures the impairment. We consider Saba to be a single reporting unit. Accordingly, all of our goodwill is associated with the entire company. We perform the required impairment analysis of goodwill annually, or on an interim basis if circumstances dictate. Any reduction of enterprise fair value below the recorded amount of stockholders’ equity could require us to write down the value of and record an expense for an impairment loss.

 

Restructuring costs. The total accrued restructuring balance as of November 30, 2005 was $110,000, which was comprised primarily of facilities-related charges. The assumptions we have made are based on the current market conditions in the various areas where we have vacant space and necessarily entail a high level of management judgment. These market conditions can fluctuate greatly due to factors such as changes in property occupancy rates and rental prices charged for comparable properties. These changes could materially affect our accrual. If, in future periods, it is determined that we have over-accrued for restructuring charges for the consolidation of facilities, the reversal of such over-accrual would have a favorable impact on our results of operations in the period this was determined and would be recorded as a credit to restructuring costs. Conversely, if it is determined that our accrual is insufficient, an additional charge would have an unfavorable impact on our results of operations in the period this was determined.

 

15


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2005 AND NOVEMBER 30, 2004

 

Revenues

 

    

Three months ended

November 30,

2005


  

Percent

of Total

Revenue


   

Three months ended

November 30,

2004


  

Percent

of Total

Revenue


 

Revenues

                          

License

   $ 5,124    32 %   $ 3,318    32 %

Services

     11,108    68 %     7,019    68 %
    

  

 

  

Total revenues

   $ 16,232    100 %   $ 10,337    100 %
    

  

 

  

    

Six months ended

November 30,

2005


  

Percent
of Total

Revenue


   

Six months ended

November 30,

2004


  

Percent
of Total

Revenue


 

Revenues

                          

License

   $ 8,520    29 %   $ 5,840    30 %

Services

     21,340    71 %     13,810    70 %
    

  

 

  

Total revenues

   $ 29,860    100 %   $ 19,650    100 %
    

  

 

  

 

Total Revenues. Total revenues increased by 57% during the three months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended November 30, 2004. This increase was the result of increases in both license and services revenue. Total revenues increased by 52% during the six months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended November 30, 2004.

 

As a percentage of total revenues, revenues from customers outside the United States represented 28% for the three months ended November 30, 2005 and 48% for the three months ended November 30, 2004. As a percentage of total revenues, revenues from customers outside the United States represented 29% for the six months ended November 30, 2005 and 51% for the six months ended November 30, 2004. During the three months and six months ended November 30, 2005, one customer represented 15% and 25%, respectively, of revenues for the three and six month periods ended November 30, 2005. During the three months and six months ended November 30, 2004, no customer represented more than 10% of our total revenues.

 

License Revenue. License revenue increased by 54% during the three months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended November 30, 2004. The increase in the license revenue dollars for the three month period ended November 30, 2005 was attributable to an increase in the average selling price of new license sales during the quarter.

 

License revenue increased by 46% during the six months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended November 30, 2004. The increase in the license revenue dollars for the six month period ended November 30, 2005 was attributable to an increase in the average selling price of new license sales during the six-month period.

 

Services Revenue. Service revenue increased by 58% during the three months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended November 30, 2004. The increase in services revenue during the three months ended November 30, 2005 is attributable to an increase in consulting revenue of approximately $1.9 million and an increase in maintenance revenue of approximately $1.5 million. The increase in consulting revenue is attributable to an increase in the number of consulting projects resulting in part from projects assumed as the result of the acquisition of THINQ. The increase in maintenance revenue results from new maintenance contracts as a result of the acquisition of THINQ, continued growth in our license base as well as a slight increase in maintenance pricing in fiscal 2005 and 2006.

 

Service revenue increased by 55% during the six months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended November 30, 2004. The increase in services revenue during the six months ended November 30, 2005 is attributable to an increase in consulting revenue of approximately $2.5 million and an increase in maintenance revenue of approximately $4.1 million. The increase in consulting revenue is attributable to an increase in the number of consulting projects resulting in part from projects assumed as the result of the acquisition of THINQ. The increase in maintenance revenue results from new maintenance contracts as a result of the acquisition of THINQ, a continual growth in our license base as well as a slight increase in maintenance pricing in fiscal 2005 and 2006.

 

International revenue as a percentage of total revenues and the mix of license and services revenue as a percentage of total revenues have varied significantly primarily due to variability in new license sales.

 

Cost of Revenues

 

     Three months ended

 
    

November 30,

2005


  

Percent

of Total

Revenue


   

November 30,

2004


  

Percent

of Total

Revenue


 
     (dollars in thousands)  

Cost of revenues:

                          

Cost of license

   $ 34    —   %   $ 97    1 %

Cost of services

     5,505    34 %     3,144    30 %
    

  

 

  

Total cost of revenues

   $ 5,539    34 %   $ 3,241    31 %
    

  

 

  

     Six months ended

 
    

November 30,

2005


  

Percent
of Total

Revenue


   

November 30,

2004


  

Percent
of Total

Revenue


 
     (dollars in thousands)  

Cost of revenues:

                          

Cost of license

   $ 293    1 %   $ 176    1 %

Cost of services

     10,547    35 %     6,159    31 %

Amortization of acquired developed technology

     —      —   %     2    —   %
    

  

 

  

Total cost of revenues

   $ 10,840    36 %   $ 6,337    32 %
    

  

 

  

 

16


Table of Contents

Cost of License Revenue. Our cost of license revenue includes the cost of manuals and product documentation, production media, shipping costs and royalties to third parties. Cost of license revenue decreased $63,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to the same period in fiscal 2004. As a percentage of license revenue, cost of license revenue was approximately 1% and 3%, respectively, for the three months ended November 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease in both dollars and percent of license revenues was due to a decrease in the number of third-party products sold during the three months ended November 30, 2005.

 

Cost of license revenue increased $117,000 for the first six months of fiscal 2005 compared to the same period in fiscal 2004. As a percentage of license revenue, cost of license revenue was approximately 3% for both the six months ended November 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. This increase in dollars is primarily due to an increase in the amount of third party royalties incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2005.

 

Cost of Services Revenue. Our cost of services revenue includes salaries and related expenses for our professional services and support organizations, as well as third-party subcontractors, hosting costs and billed expenses. For the three months ended November 30, 2005 cost of services revenue increased $2.4 million, or 75%, compared to the three months ended November 30, 2004. As a percent of services revenues, cost of services revenue increased from 45% for the three months ended November 30, 2004 to 50% for the three months ended November 30, 2005. The increase in both dollars and percent of services revenue is primarily attributable to an increase in employee payroll related expense of $1.7 million as a result of an increase in consulting headcount due in part to the acquisition of THINQ. The increase in cost of services revenue also included an increase in sub-contractors costs of approximately $339,000.

 

For the six months ended November 30, 2005 cost of services revenue increased $4.4 million, or 71%, compared to the six months ended November 30, 2004. As a percent of services revenues, cost of services revenue increased from 45% for the six months ended November 30, 2004 to 49% for the six months ended November 30, 2005. The increase in both dollars and percent of services revenue is primarily attributable to an increase in employee payroll related expense of $2.3 million as a result of an increase in consulting headcount due in part to the acquisition of THINQ. The increase in cost of services revenue also included an increase in sub-contractors costs of approximately $635,000.

 

Amortization of Acquired Developed Technology. The cost of revenues for the six months ended November 30, 2004 included amortization of acquired developed technology of $2,000. This amortization resulted from our March 2001 acquisition of Human Performance Technologies, Inc. and June 2001 acquisition of Ultris Inc. These intangible assets were fully amortized as of August 31, 2004.

 

17


Table of Contents

Operating Expenses

 

We classify all operating expenses, except amortization of purchased intangible assets, to the research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expense categories based on the nature of the expenses. Each of these three categories includes commonly recurring expenses such as salaries, employee benefits, stock compensation, other stock charges, travel and entertainment costs, and allocated communication, rent and depreciation costs. We allocate these expenses to each of the functional areas that derive a benefit from such expenses based upon their respective headcounts. The sales and marketing category of operating expenses also includes sales commissions and expenses related to public relations and advertising, trade shows and marketing collateral materials. The general and administrative category of operating expenses also includes allowance for doubtful accounts and administrative and professional services fees.

 

     Three months ended

 
    

November 30,

2005


  

Percent

of Total

Revenue


   

November 30,

2004


  

Percent

of Total

Revenue


 
     (dollars in thousands)  

Operating expenses:

                          

Research and development

   $ 2,826    17 %   $ 2,415    23 %

Sales and marketing

     6,093    38 %     4,129    40 %

General and administrative

     1,337    8 %     1,184    11 %

Amortization of purchased intangible assets

     170    1 %     —      —   %
    

  

 

  

Total operating expenses

   $ 10,425    64 %   $ 7,728    74 %
    

  

 

  

     Six months ended

 
    

November 30,

2005


  

Percent
of Total

Revenue


   

November 30,

2004


   Percent
of Total
Revenue


 
     (dollars in thousands)  

Operating expenses:

                          

Research and development

   $ 5,583    19 %   $ 4,780    24 %

Sales and marketing

     11,563    39 %     8,466    43 %

General and administrative

     2,769    9 %     2,316    12 %

Amortization of purchased intangible assets

     340    1 %     —      —   %
    

  

 

  

Total operating expenses

   $ 20,255    68 %   $ 15,562    79 %
    

  

 

  

 

Research and development. Research and development expenses increased $411,000, or 17% , for the three months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended November 30, 2004. The increase was primarily due to an increase in costs to translate our software into foreign languages of $221,000 and an increase in employee related salary and benefits expenses of $232,000, in part as a result of the acquisition of THINQ in May 2005. We expect research and development expenses to increase in the foreseeable future.

 

Research and development expenses increased $804,000, or 17% , for the six months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended November 30, 2004. The increase was primarily due to an increase in costs to translate our software into foreign languages of $521,000 and an increase in employee related salary and benefits expenses of $346,000, in part as a result of the full impact of the acquisition of THINQ in May, 2005. We expect research and development expenses to increase in the foreseeable future.

 

Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased $2.0 million, or 48%, for the three months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended November 30, 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in employee salary and benefits of $1.4 million, which includes commissions expense of $392,000 as a result of an increase in revenues, and an increase in recruiting fees of $169,000 and travel related expense of $155,000, all related to an increase in sales personnel resulting partly from the acquisition of THINQ and from our objective to increase our sales presence worldwide.

 

Sales and marketing expenses increased $3.1 million, or 37%, for the six months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended November 30, 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in employee salary and benefits of $2.1 million, which includes commissions expense of $533,000 as a result of an increase in revenues, and an increase in recruiting fees of $459,000 and travel related expense of $141,000, all related to an increase in sales personnel resulting partly from the acquisition of THINQ and from our objective to increase our sales presence worldwide. Also, marketing related programs increased approximately $248,000 as a result of the our drive to expand its presence within the public sector market as well as other markets worldwide.

 

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $154,000, or 13%, for the three months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended November 30, 2004. The increase is due to an increase in employee salary and benefits expenses of approximately $253,000 which was primarily the result of an increase in headcount partly related to the acquisition of THINQ and partly to an increase in our finance organization during fiscal 2006, an increase in outside service provider fees of $89,000, offset by a decrease in depreciation expense of $108,000 as a result of certain depreciable assets reaching their full depreciable lives.

 

General and administrative expenses increased $453,000, or 20%, for the six months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended November 30, 2004. The increase is due to an increase in employee salary and benefits expenses of approximately $393,000, which was primarily the result of an increase in headcount partly related to the acquisition of THINQ and partly to an increase in our finance organization during fiscal 2006, an increase in outside service provider fees of $259,000, offset by a decrease in depreciation expense of $237,000 as a result of certain depreciable assets reaching their full depreciable lives.

 

Amortization of purchased intangible assets. Amortization of purchased intangible assets for the three and six months ended November 30, 2005 is attributable to the intangible assets acquired as a result of the acquisition of THINQ in May 2005.

 

Interest income (expense) and other, net. Interest income (expense) and other, net consists of interest income, interest expense and other non-operating expenses. Interest income (expense) increased by $113,000 in net expense for the three months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended November 30, 2004.

 

18


Table of Contents

Interest income (expense) increased by $206,000 in net expense for the six months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended November 30, 2004. The increase in expense for both the three month and six month comparisons is primarily attributable to an increase in foreign exchange losses resulting from unfavorable fluctuations in foreign currency denominated payables as well as to an increase in interest expense as a result of the bank borrowings of $4.5 million in May 2005 due to the acquisition of THINQ.

 

Provision for income taxes. From inception through November 30, 2005, we have incurred net losses for federal and state tax purposes. Income tax expense was $26,000 during the three months ended November 30, 2005 compared to $40,000 during the three months ended November 30, 2004. Income tax expense was $34,000 during the six months ended November 30, 2005 compared to $82,000 during the six months ended November 30, 2004. Income tax expense during all of these periods consists entirely of foreign tax expense incurred as a result of local country profits.

 

We are subject to routine income tax audit by certain foreign tax authorities. During fiscal year 2005, we received notices of assessment relating to transfer pricing matters which we are contesting. We believe that adequate tax provisions have been provided for the likely outcome of the ongoing examination. We will continually review our estimates related to our income tax obligations, including potential assessments of additional taxes, penalties and/or interest, and revise our estimates, if necessary. A revision in our estimates of our tax obligations will be reflected as an adjustment to our income tax provision at the time of the change in our estimates. Such a revision could materially impact our income tax provision and net income.

 

The Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the full amount of the net deferred tax assets, as it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

 

FLUCTUATIONS OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

 

Our results of operations could vary significantly from quarter to quarter. If revenues fall below our expectations, we will not be able to reduce our spending rapidly in response to the shortfall and operating losses will increase. We anticipate that we will continue to experience long sales cycles. Therefore, the timing of future customer contracts could be difficult to predict, making it difficult to predict revenues between quarters.

 

Other factors that could affect our quarterly operating results include those described below and under the caption “Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results:”

 

    dependence of our revenues on a small number of large orders and the average order value;

 

    our ability to attract new customers;

 

    any changes in revenue recognition rules and interpretations of these rules;

 

    our ability to license additional products to current customers;

 

    the announcement or introduction of new products or services by us or our competitors;

 

    changes in the pricing of our products and services or those of our competitors;

 

    variability in the mix of our products and services revenues in any quarter;

 

    the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to expansion or contraction of our business

 

    foreign currency fluctuations; and

 

    our ability to integrate operations from acquisitions successfully.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

     Six months ended

 
     November 30,
2005


   

November 30,

2004


 
     (in thousands)  

Cash used in operating activities

   $ (326 )   $ (6,832 )

Cash (used in) investing activities

   $ (313 )   $ (151 )

Cash used in (provided by) financing activities

   $ (1,055 )   $ 5,159  

 

As of November 30, 2005 our principal source of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents of $13.7 million.

 

Since August 2002, Saba has maintained a credit facility with a bank. The current credit facility grants Saba access to a revolving line of credit of $250,000, a new equipment term loan of up to $500,000 and a new term loan of up to $4.5 million. Borrowings on the revolving line of credit and new equipment term loan credit facilities may be made through March, 2006.

 

19


Table of Contents

On November 10, 2005, the Company amended the credit facility with the bank. The amended credit facility requires the Company to maintain a minimum balance of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of (a) $11 million as of any fiscal quarter end through May 31, 2006, (b) $10 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter from May 5, 2005 through September 15, 2005 and from December 1, 2005 through May 31, 2006, (c) $8 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter end from September 16, 2005 through November 29, 2005 (d) $9 million at any time during the period from June 1, 2006 through May 31, 2007, and (e) $7.5 million for any date thereafter.

 

As of November 30, 2005, Saba had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving line of credit and was in compliance with all of the covenants related to this credit facility. On January 13, 2006, the Company further amended the credit facility to require the Company to maintain a minimum balance of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of (a) $11 million as of any fiscal quarter end through May 31, 2006, (b) $10 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter from May 5, 2005 through September 15, 2005 and from March 1, 2006 through May 30, 2006, (c) $8 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter end from September 16, 2005 through November 29, 2005, (d) $7.5 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter end from December 1, 2005 through February 27, 2006 (e) $9 million at any time during the period from May 31, 2006 through May 30, 2007, and (f) $7.5 million for any date thereafter.

 

Saba has and expects to continue to comply with the end of quarter cash covenants included in the credit facility. However, because of the variability in timing of accounts payable and accounts receivable within a quarter, the amendments to the credit facility have been and may continue to be necessary for Saba to remain compliant with the intra-quarter cash covenants. As a result of this intra-quarter variability, in the next twelve months Saba may not be compliant with the intra-quarter cash covenant and as a result, all outstanding amounts payable under the credit facility have been classified as a current liability in the accompanying balance sheet.

 

20


Table of Contents

Cash Used In Operating Activities

 

Cash used in operating activities was $442,000 during the six months ended November 30, 2005 compared to $6.8 million during the six months ended November 30, 2004. Cash used in operating activities during the six months ended November 30, 2005 was primarily attributable to a net loss of $1.5 million, a decrease in accrued expenses of $2.0 million and a decrease in deferred revenues of $630,000, offset by a reduction in receivables of $1.5 million. This compares to a net loss of $2.4 million, an increase in receivables of $3.9 million and a decrease in accrued expenses of $1.0 million during the six months ended November 30, 2004, offset by an increase in deferred revenue of $141,000.

 

The decrease in accrued expenses for the six months ended November 30, 2005 is due primarily to the payments made for accrued VAT taxes, professional services, acquisition related costs and other liabilities we assumed as a result of our acquisition of ThinQ. Deferred revenues increased due to an increase in our average selling price on new license deals, which drives the price of support agreements. The revenue on support agreements is initially deferred and then recognized ratably over the term of the support. The decrease in receivables during the first six months of 2005 is the result of $6.0 million increase in billings during the first six months of fiscal 2006 offset by increased collections of approximately $7.5 million.

 

Cash Provided By Investing Activities

 

Cash used in investing activities during the six months ended November 30, 2005 was $270,000 compared to $151,000 in cash used in investing activities for the six months ended November 30, 2004. The increase in cash used from investing activities in fiscal 2006 was primarily attributable to proceeds of $150,000 from maturities of investments during the first six month of fiscal 2005, compared to no proceeds from maturities of investments in the first six months of fiscal 2006.

 

Cash Provided By Financing Activities

 

Cash used in financing activities of $1.1 million during the six months ended November 30, 2005 was primarily attributable to repayments on borrowings under our credit facility of $1.1 million. Cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended November 30, 2004 was primarily attributable to the proceeds from issuance of common stock in private placement of $8.7 million, which was offset by repayments on borrowings under our credit facility of $3.5 million.

 

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

 

As of November 30, 2005 there was no material change in our total debt obligations, capital leases, operating lease obligations, purchase obligations or any other long-term liabilities reflected on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as compared to such obligations and liabilities as of May 31, 2005. At November 30, 2005, we did not have any material commitments for capital expenses or significant commitments to purchase obligations for goods or services.

 

We currently anticipate that our available cash resources and credit facilities, combined with cash flows generated from revenues, will be sufficient to meet our presently anticipated working capital, capital expense and business expansion requirements, for at least the next 12 months. However, we may be required, or could choose, to raise additional funds at any time. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including our future revenues, the timing and extent of spending to support product development efforts and expansion of sales and marketing and general and administrative activities, the success of our existing and new product and service offerings and competing technological and market developments. There can be no assurance that additional funding, if needed, will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of November 30, 2005, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.

 

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

On December 16, 2004 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Standards 123R (“SFAS”), Share-Based Payment, which replaces SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation and Accounting Practice Bulletin (“APB”) 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS123R requires that any share based payment made to an employee, including stock options and shares purchased under employee stock purchase plans, is recognized in the financial statements based on fair value. Under the terms of SFAS 123R, the fair value of any equity award is estimated at the grant date and is recognized as compensation cost over the service period for all awards that are subject to a vesting period. SFAS123R requires that fair value be estimated using an option pricing model that takes into account at least the following items: the exercise price, the expected term of the option, the current price of the underlying share, the expected volatility of the price of the underlying share, the expected dividends on the underlying share and the risk free rate of interest.

 

We are required to adopt SFAS 123(R) in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The effects of the adoption of SFAS 123R on our results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon a number of factors, including the number of employee options which may be granted in the future, the future market value and volatility of our stock price, movements in the risk free rate of interest, stock option exercise and forfeiture patterns and the stock option valuation model used to estimate the fair value of each option. As a result of these variables it is not possible at this time to accurately estimate the effect that the adoption of SFAS123R will have on our future results of operations. However, we expect the adoption of FAS 123 (R) to have a material adverse impact on our net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share. Note 8 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Form 10-Q provides an indication of the effects of using one option-pricing model, the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, which was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, on our current results of operations using the assumptions detailed therein to estimate the fair value of employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares upon the results of our operations for the three and six months ended November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2004.

 

On June 7, 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Previously, most voluntary changes in accounting principles required recognition of a cumulative effect adjustment within net income of the period of the change. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however it does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements. We do not believe adoption of SFAS 154 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

On June 29, 2005, the FASB ratified the EITF’s Issue No. 05-06, Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold Improvements. Issue 05-06 provides that the amortization period used for leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or purchased after the inception of a lease be the shorter of (a) the useful life of the assets or (b) a term that includes required lease periods and renewals that are reasonably assured upon the acquisition or the purchase. The provisions of Issue 05-06 are effective on a prospective basis for leasehold improvements purchased or acquired beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. We do not believe the adoption of Issue 05-06 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

21


Table of Contents

FACTORS THAT MAY IMPACT FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS

 

RISK FACTORS

 

We have a history of losses, expect future losses and cannot assure you that we will achieve profitability.

 

We have incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since our inception. We have not achieved profitability and cannot be certain that we will realize sufficient revenues to achieve or sustain profitability. We expect to derive substantially all of our revenues for the foreseeable future from the licensing of Saba Enterprise Learning and providing related services. Over the longer term, we expect to derive revenues from new products such as Saba Enterprise Performance and related services. In the future, we expect to continue to incur non-cash expenses relating to the amortization of purchased intangible assets that will contribute to our net losses, along with any potential goodwill impairment. As of November 30, 2005, we had $4.3 million of purchased intangible assets to be amortized as a result of our May 2005 acquisition of THINQ Learning Solutions, Inc., and our remaining goodwill balance was $15.2 million. As a result, we expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future. We will need to generate significantly higher revenues and manage expenses in order to achieve profitability or control negative cash flows. If we achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain it on a consistent basis.

 

Fluctuations in our results could cause our stock price to experience significant fluctuations or declines.

 

Our operating results have varied significantly in the past and will likely fluctuate significantly in the future. For instance, in fiscal 2005 and in fiscal 2004, our quarterly revenues have fluctuated between approximately $12.0 million and $7.8 million and our quarterly net loss fluctuated between approximately $500,000 and $5.9 million. Our quarterly operating results are likely to be particularly affected by the number of customers licensing our products during any quarter and the size of such licensing transactions. As a result, we have limited visibility into our future revenue, especially license revenue, which often has been heavily concentrated in the third month of each quarter. Since we forecast our expenses based in part on future revenue projections, our operating results would be adversely affected if we cannot meet those revenue projections.

 

Other factors that could affect our quarterly operating results include:

 

    the demand for our products and professional services and our efficiency in rendering our professional services;

 

    the variability in the mix of our license and services revenue in any quarter;

 

    the variability in the mix of the type of services delivered in any quarter and the extent to which third party contractors are used to provide such services;

 

    the size and complexity of our license transactions and potential delays in recognizing revenue from license transactions;

 

    the amount and timing of our operating expenses and capital expenditures; the performance of our international business, which accounts for a substantial part of our consolidated revenues; and

 

    fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

 

Due to these and other factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our revenues and operating results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicators of future performance. It is possible that in some future quarter our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts or investors, which could cause the market price of our common stock to fall.

 

Our operating expenses are based on our expectations of future revenues and are relatively fixed in the short-term. During fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003, we took actions to reduce our operating expenses and, while we may from time to time reduce operating expenses in response to variability in our revenues, including variability caused by downturns in the United States and/or international economies, over the long term, we generally expect to increase our operating expenses to expand our sales and marketing operations, fund greater levels of research and development, develop new alliances, increase our services and support capabilities and improve our operational and financial systems. If our revenues do not increase along with these expenses, our business would be seriously harmed and net losses in a given quarter would be even larger than expected. We may undertake future restructuring to align such expenses with revenues.

 

A decline in the price of, or demand for, our main product, Saba Enterprise Learning, or our related services offerings, would seriously harm our revenues and operating margins.

 

To date, Saba Enterprise Learning and related services have accounted for a substantial majority of our revenues. We anticipate that revenues from Saba Enterprise Learning and related services will continue to constitute a substantial majority of our revenues for the foreseeable future. Consequently, a decline in the price of, or demand for, Saba Enterprise Learning or failure to achieve broad market acceptance would seriously harm our business. If our new products, including Saba Enterprise Performance, fail to achieve market acceptance, our reliance on Saba Enterprise Learning will deepen.

 

We experience seasonality in our sales, which could cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter.

 

We experience quarterly seasonality in the licensing of our products and delivery of our services. For example, revenue has historically been lower in our first fiscal quarter than in the immediately preceding fourth fiscal quarter. Contributing to this seasonality is the timing of our first fiscal quarter that occurs during the summer months when general business activities slow down in a number of territories where we conduct our operations, particularly Europe. Our commission structure and other sales incentives also tend to result in fewer sales in the first fiscal quarter than in the fourth fiscal quarter. These seasonal variations in our revenue are likely to lead to fluctuations in our quarterly operating results.

 

Our products have a long sales cycle, which increases the cost of completing sales and renders completion of sales less predictable.

 

The period between our initial contact with a potential customer and the purchase of our products and services is often long. A customer’s decision to purchase our products and services requires the commitment to increase performance through human capital development and management, involves a significant allocation of resources, and is influenced by a customer’s budgetary cycles. To successfully sell our products and services, we generally must educate our potential customers regarding the use and benefits of our products and services. We may commit a substantial amount of time and resources to potential customers without assurance that any sales will be completed or revenues generated. Many of our potential customers are large enterprises that generally take longer to make significant business decisions. Our public sector customers, in particular, are subject to extensive procurement procedures that require many reviews and approvals. Our typical sales cycle has been approximately six to 12 months, making it difficult to predict the quarter in which we may recognize revenue. The delay or failure to complete sales in a particular quarter could reduce our revenues in that quarter. If our sales cycle were to unexpectedly lengthen in general or for one or more large orders, it would adversely affect the timing of our revenues. If we were to experience a delay on a large order, it could harm our ability to meet our forecasts for a given quarter.

 

22


Table of Contents

Our performance depends on a new market: human capital development and management.

 

The market for software solutions that automate human capital development and management is at an early stage of development and rapidly evolving. Substantially all of our revenues are attributable to the suite of products and services in this market. If this market fails to develop or develops more slowly than we expect our business would be harmed. If the market grows, the prices of our products may decline rapidly as alternative products are introduced into the market. In addition, our products may become obsolete if we fail to anticipate or adapt to evolving technology standards, or if we fail to identify the challenges and risks in this new market or successfully address these risks.

 

Our past and future acquisitions may result in disruptions to our business if we fail to adequately integrate acquired businesses.

 

In 2001, we acquired Human Performance Technologies, Inc. and Ultris Inc. and in May 2005 we acquired THINQ Learning Solutions, Inc. We cannot assure that the THINQ acquisition will advance our long-term strategy. We may incur greater than anticipated costs from assuming obligations to support THINQ products, diverting resources from new products. THINQ customers may decline to upgrade to Saba Enterprise Learning, instead adopting competitors’ software. In addition, THINQ’s suppliers, distributors and key technical, sales and senior management personnel may terminate their relationship with us.

 

As part of our overall business strategy, we expect to continue to acquire complementary businesses or technologies that will provide additional products or services offerings, additional industry expertise or an expanded geographic presence. In line with that strategy, on October 6, 2005 we announced our agreement to acquire Centra Software, Inc.

 

These acquisitions could result in the use of significant amounts of cash, the incurrence of debt, or potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities which may reduce earnings per share. In addition, any acquisition may increase the risk of future write-offs for acquired in-process research and development, write-offs for the impairment of goodwill or long-lived assets, or amortization of expenses related to intangible assets, any of which could materially adversely affect our business and our operating results. For example, as of November 30, 2005, our remaining goodwill balance was $15.2 million. Acquisitions that we complete expose us to numerous risks, including:

 

    difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies, products and personnel of the acquired company;

 

    the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;

 

    risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and

 

    the potential loss of key employees, significant customers and strategic partners of the acquired company; and

 

    exposure to claims by terminated employees, stockholders of the acquired company or other third parties related to the acquisition. Although we generally obtain indemnification and other contractual protection against such claims, we cannot assure that they will be enforceable or sufficient to protect us.

 

We are subject to several additional risks due to our recently announced agreement to acquire Centra Software, Inc., including possible future dilution of earnings per share, depressed stock price, unsuccessful integration, loss of key employees, customer and employee uncertainty and incurrence of significant costs.

 

On October 6, 2005 we announced that we had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Centra Software, Inc. for a combination of our common stock and cash. Centra provides software and services for online learning and training and enables groups to work faster and more effectively by automating critical learning and training initiatives online through virtual classrooms, online meetings and Web conferences. The merger transaction has been approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies but is subject to stockholder approval and other customary closing conditions. Once approved, the consideration to be received by the stockholders of Centra will be $0.663 per share in cash and 0.354 per share in Saba common stock for each share of Centra common stock held. The total estimated purchase price for Centra of approximately $58.3 million will consist of (i) approximately $19.1 million in cash, (ii) $37.3 million in Saba’s common stock (assuming the issuance of approximately 10.2 million shares of Saba common stock to Centra stockholders), and (iii) acquisition related expenses of approximately $1.8 million, consisting primarily of fees due to financial advisors and other professionals. The number of shares of our common stock that we will be obligated to issue in the merger is expected to equal approximately 36% of our common stock outstanding before the merger.

 

On November 14, 2005, together with Centra, we filed a joint proxy statement/prospectus on Form S-4 with the SEC in connection with the proposed merger, which was declared effective by the SEC on December 19, 2005. Investors and security holders are urged to read the joint proxy statement/prospectus and any other relevant documents filed with the SEC because they contain important information regarding us, Centra, and the proposed merger. Investors and security holders will be able to obtain a copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and other documents filed by us and Centra with the SEC free of charge at the website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Separate special meetings of stockholders of both Saba and Centra are expected to be held on January 26, 2006 to vote upon the proposed merger. The closing of the merger is expected to occur during the third quarter of our fiscal year ending May 31, 2006.

 

Completion of the merger may result in dilution of future earnings per share to our stockholders.

 

The completion of the merger may not result in improved earnings per share for us or a financial condition superior to that which would have been achieved by us on a stand-alone basis. The merger could fail to produce the benefits that we anticipate, or could have other adverse effects that we does not foresee. In addition, some of the assumptions that we have made, such as the achievement of operating synergies, may not be realized. In this event, the merger could result in a reduction of earnings per share for us as compared to the earnings per share that would have been achieved by us if the merger had not occurred.

 

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the open market by Centra stockholders could depress our stock price.

 

Other than shares held by affiliates of Centra or us, shares of our common stock that are issued to stockholders of Centra will be freely tradable by the stockholders of Centra without restrictions or further registration under the Securities Act. If the merger with Centra closes and if Centra’s stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market following the merger, the market price of our common stock may decrease substantially.

 

If we and Centra are not successful in integrating their organizations, the anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized.

 

Achieving the anticipated benefits of the merger will depend, in part, on the integration of technology, operations and personnel of us and Centra. We cannot assure that the integration will be successful or that the anticipated benefits of the merger will be fully realized. The challenges involved in this integration include the following:

 

    satisfying the needs of the combined company’s customers in a timely and efficient manner;

 

    persuading our and Centra’s employees that Centra’s business cultures are compatible and retaining the combined company’s key personnel;

 

    realizing anticipated cost synergies within the expected time period;

 

    maintaining the dedication of our and Centra’s management resources to integration activities without diverting attention from the day-to-day business of the combined company;

 

    maintaining our and Centra’s management’s ability to focus on anticipating, responding to or utilizing changing technologies in our and Centra’s industry;

 

    maintaining our and Centra’s key supplier relationships; and

 

    competing with the introduction of new, disruptive technologies to the marketplace which could reduce our and Centra’s market share prior to the successful integration of the two companies.

 

In addition, after the merger, we intend to more tightly integrate Centra’s products and intellectual property with our products and intellectual property. This may result in longer product development cycles, which may cause the revenue and operating income of Centra and the revenue and operating income of our businesses that are collaborating with Centra to fluctuate and fail to meet expectations.

 

It is not certain that we and Centra can be successfully integrated in a timely manner or at all or that any of the anticipated benefits will be realized. In addition, we cannot assure that there will not be substantial unanticipated costs associated with the integration process, that integration activities will not result in a decrease in revenues or a decrease in the value of our common stock, or that there will not be other material adverse effects from our integration efforts.

 

If we are unable to successfully integrate Centra, or if the benefits of the merger do not meet the expectations of financial or industry analysts, the market price of our common stock may decline.

 

Failure to retain key employees could diminish the benefits of the merger.

 

The successful combination of us and Centra will depend in part on the retention of key personnel. We have entered into employment agreements with three of Centra’s officers, Richard Cramer, John Walsh and Michelle Caggiano. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain Centra’s key personnel, or that we will realize the anticipated benefits of the merger in any event.

 

Customer and employee uncertainty related to the merger could harm the combined company.

 

Customers of us or Centra may, in response to the announcement of the merger, delay or defer purchasing decisions. Any delay or deferral in purchasing decisions by us or Centra’s customers could seriously harm the business of the combined company. Similarly, we and Centra employees may experience uncertainty about their future role with the combined company until or after strategies with regard to the combined company are announced or executed. This may adversely affect the combined company’s ability to attract and retain key management, marketing, sales, customer support and technical personnel, which could harm the combined company.

 

We and Centra expect to incur significant costs associated with the merger.

 

We and Centra estimate that they will incur direct transaction costs of approximately $3.7 million associated with the merger which will be capitalized as part of the overall purchase cost. We and Centra believe the combined entity may incur charges to operations, which are not reasonably capable of estimation at this time, in the quarter in which the merger is completed or the following quarters, to reflect costs associated with integrating the two companies. There is no assurance that the combined company will not incur additional material charges in subsequent quarters to reflect additional costs associated with the merger.

 

If the merger is not completed, our and Centra’s stock prices and future business and operations could be harmed.

 

If the merger is not completed, we and Centra may be subject to the following material risks, among others:

 

    the prices of our and Centra common stock may change to the extent that the current market prices of our and Centra common stock reflect an assumption that the merger will be completed;
    our and Centra’s costs related to the merger, such as legal, accounting and some of the fees of their financial advisors, must be paid even if the merger is not completed; and
    under some circumstances (more fully described under the heading, “Terms of the Merger Agreement--Expenses; Payment of Termination Fees” on page 85 of the joint proxy statement/prospectus), we may be required to pay Centra a termination fee of $1,798,625 if the merger agreement is terminated by Centra under certain circumstances and Centra may be required to pay us a termination fee of $1,798,625 if the merger agreement is terminated by us under certain circumstances.

 

Changes in accounting regulations and related interpretations and policies, particularly those related to revenue recognition, could cause us to defer recognition of revenue or recognize lower revenue or to report lower earnings per share.

 

While we believe that we are in compliance with Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants continues to issue implementation guidelines for these standards and the accounting profession continues to discuss a wide range of potential interpretations. Additional implementation guidelines, and changes in interpretations of such guidelines, could lead to unanticipated changes in our current revenue accounting practices that could cause us to defer the recognition of revenue to future periods or to recognize lower revenue.

 

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has adopted Statement No. 123R, which requires us to recognize as an expense stock-based compensation to employees based on their fair values, and eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25. As a result, when we record an expense for our stock-based compensation plans using the fair value method beginning in fiscal year 2007, we may have significant compensation charges. For example, for the fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, had we accounted for stock-based compensation plans under Statement No. 123R using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, we estimate that basic and diluted net loss per share, using the fair value method, would have been increased by $0.50, $0.89 and $1.02 per share, respectively.

 

Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.

 

We are in the process of documenting and testing our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires an annual management assessment of the design and effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our Independent Auditors addressing this assessment. Depending on our market capitalization on November 30, 2006, we will be required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for either the fiscal year ending May 31, 2007 or May 31, 2008. During the course of our testing we may identify significant deficiencies or material weaknesses which we may not be able to remediate prior to our fiscal year end. In addition, if we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Moreover, effective internal controls are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our stock could drop significantly.

 

The loss of our senior executives and key personnel would likely cause our business to suffer.

 

Our ability to implement a successful long-term strategy, strengthen our competitive position, expand our customer base, and develop and support our products depends to a significant degree on the performance of the senior management team and other key employees. The loss of any of these individuals could harm our business. We do not have employment agreements with any of our executives or other key employees, and we do not maintain key person life insurance for any officers or key employees.

 

Intense competition in our target market could impair our ability to grow and achieve profitability.

 

The market for our products and services is intensely competitive, dynamic, and subject to rapid technological change. The intensity of the competition and the pace of change are expected to increase in the future. Increased competition is likely to result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any one of which could seriously harm our business. Competitors vary in size and in the scope and breadth of the products and services offered. We encounter competition with respect to different aspects of our solution from a variety of sources including:

 

    companies that market and license training, learning, performance, content, resource, talent, and staffing management systems;

 

    enterprise software vendors that offer human resources information systems and employee relationship management systems with training and performance modules;

 

    potential customers’ internal development efforts;

 

    companies that operate Internet-based marketplaces for the sale of on-line learning;

 

23


Table of Contents
    companies that operate Internet-based marketplaces for the sale of goods and services and could potentially decide to evolve their marketplaces to include content offerings; and

 

    Internet portals that offer learning content, performance support tools or recruiting services.

 

We expect competition from a variety of companies.

 

Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, substantially greater financial, technical, marketing or other resources, or greater name recognition than we do, enabling them to respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. Such resources also enable our competitors to withstand prolonged periods of negative cash flows and unfavorable economic, political, and market conditions. Competition could seriously impede our ability to sell additional products and services on terms favorable to us. Our current and potential competitors may develop and market new technologies that render our existing or future products and services obsolete, unmarketable or less competitive. Our current and potential competitors may make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with other partners, thereby increasing the availability of their services to address the needs of our current and prospective customers. We may not be able to compete successfully against our current and future competitors, and competitive pressures that we encounter may seriously harm our business.

 

If we are unable to manage the complexity of conducting business globally, our international revenues may suffer.

 

International revenues accounted for 42% of revenues in fiscal 2005 and 44% of revenues in fiscal 2004. Although we intend to continue to expand our international presence, in the future we may not be able to successfully market, sell or distribute our products and services in foreign markets. The reallocation of certain design, development and testing functions from the United States to our lower-cost development center in India intensifies our exposure to international uncertainties. Factors that could materially adversely affect our international operations, and our business and future growth include:

 

    difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations, including language barriers;

 

    difficulties in maintaining control over product development and quality, and timing of product releases;

 

    seasonal fluctuations in purchasing patterns in other countries, particularly declining sales during July and August in European markets;

 

    difficulties in collecting accounts receivable in foreign countries, particularly European countries in which collections take considerably more time than the United States and collections are more difficult to effect;

 

    currency exchange rate fluctuations, particularly in countries where we sell our products in denominations other than U.S. dollars, such as in the United Kingdom, the euro zone, and Japan, or have exposures in inter-company accounts denominated in foreign currencies;

 

    costs attributable to development of internationalized versions of our products and marketing and sales materials;

 

    the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;

 

    tariffs, export controls, and other trade barriers, and

 

    exposure to geopolitical instability, natural disasters and acts of war or terrorism..

 

Delays in releasing new products or enhanced versions of our existing products could adversely affect our competitive position.

 

As part of our strategy, we expect to regularly release new products and new versions of our existing products. Even if our new products or new versions of our existing products contain the features and functionality our customers want, in the event we are unable to timely introduce these new products or product releases, our competitive position may be harmed. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully complete the development of currently planned or future products or product releases in a timely and efficient manner. Due to the complexity of our products, internal quality assurance testing and customer testing of pre-commercial releases may reveal product performance issues or desirable feature enhancements that could lead us to postpone the release of these products. In addition, the reallocation of resources associated with any postponement would likely cause delays in the development and release of other future products or enhancements to our currently available products. The reallocation of certain design, development and testing functions to our new lower-cost development center heightens risks relating to product design, development, testing, and introduction. Any delay in releasing future products or enhancements of our products could harm our business.

 

If we release products containing defects, we may need to halt further shipments and our business and reputation would be harmed.

 

Products as complex as ours often contain unknown and undetected errors or performance problems. Although our products are subject to rigorous testing and quality control processes, serious defects are frequently found during the period immediately following introduction and initial shipment of new products or enhancements to existing products. Although we attempt to resolve all errors that we believe would be considered serious by our customers before shipment to them, our products are not error-free. These errors or performance problems could result in lost revenues or delays in customer acceptance and would be detrimental to our business and reputation. As is typical in the software industry, with each release we have discovered errors in our products after introduction. We will not be able to detect and correct all errors before releasing our products commercially and these undetected errors could be significant. We cannot assure you that undetected errors or performance problems in our existing or future products will not be discovered in the future or that known errors considered minor by us will not be considered serious by our customers, resulting in cancellation of orders, loss of customers, difficulties in achieving our sales goals, increased demands on our support services, and a decrease in our revenues. To correct such errors, we may expend considerable time and resources to develop and release modifications to our software.

 

As a result of such errors, we may be subject to warranty and product liability claims that are costly or difficult to settle. Our products and services enable customers to manage critical business information. If product errors are alleged to cause or contribute to security and privacy breaches or misappropriation of confidential information, we may also be subject to significant liability. Although our license agreements contain provisions intended to limit our exposure to liability, we cannot assure that they will be enforceable or, if enforceable, interpreted favorably by a court.

 

Claims by third parties that we infringe their intellectual property rights may result in costly litigation.

 

In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights, particularly in the software and Internet-related industries. We have in the past been subject to an intellectual property action. In our market, one company initiated patent infringement actions against us and at least four other companies in 2002 . In September 2003, we settled the action against us and recorded a charge of $1.7 million. We have paid all amounts due under this settlement. We could become subject to additional intellectual property infringement claims as the number of our competitors grows and our products and services overlap with competitive offerings. Any of these claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive to defend and could divert management’s attention from operating the company. If we become liable to third parties for infringing their intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay a substantial award of damages and to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products that contain the infringing intellectual property. We may be unable to develop non-infringing technology or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, agreements with our customers typically include indemnity provisions requiring us to

 

24


Table of Contents

hold these customers harmless against specified losses arising from third party claims that our products infringe the intellectual property rights of such other third parties. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount of liability under any indemnification obligations, whether or not asserted, due to the unique facts and circumstances that are likely to be involved in each particular claim.

 

In addition, we may be negatively affected by litigation that Centra is subject to. Centra has publicly disclosed that on August 19, 2003, EdiSync Systems, LLC filed a complaint against Centra in federal court in Denver, Colorado, alleging infringement of two patents for a remote multiple user editing system and method and seeking to enjoin Centra from continuing to sell its products, as well as unspecified compensatory damages. Although Centra believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously defend this action, it can give no assurance that it will be able to achieve a satisfactory outcome. Also, on December 9, 2005, Centra received a letter from Acacia Technologies Group claiming that Acacia’s subsidiary TechSearch LLC owns the rights to license and enforce U.S. Patent No. 5,119, 319 (the “‘319 Patent”) relating to video communications systems having full-duplex capability. The letter alleges that Centra’s Centra Live Software (to conduct conferencing services) infringes upon the ‘319 Patent. Centra is evaluating Acacia’s claim, which is in the very early stages. Centra does not believe that it has infringed upon any Acacia patents; however, there can be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of this claim will not have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of Centra or the combined company, if and when the merger between Saba and Centra is consummated.

 

We may not be able to adequately protect our proprietary technology, and our competitors may be able to offer similar products and services that would harm our competitive position.

 

Our success depends upon our proprietary technology. We rely primarily on copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to establish and protect our proprietary rights. As part of our confidentiality procedures, we enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees. Despite these precautions, third parties could copy or otherwise obtain and use our technology without authorization, which may represent potential sales and revenue losses that are difficult to quantify. Policing unauthorized used of our technology is difficult, time-consuming, and costly. Were we to discover instances of unauthorized use, there can be no assurance that we would be able to enforce our proprietary rights or obtain adequate recovery for our losses. In addition, we have four patents issued in the United States and five patent applications pending in the United States. We cannot assure you that any patents will be issued for any of the pending patent applications. Even for the issued patents, or any patent issued to us in the future, there can be no assurance that such patent will protect our intellectual property, or will not be challenged by third parties. Furthermore, effective protection of intellectual property rights is unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries. We cannot assure you that the protection of our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products and services or design around any patents or other intellectual property rights we hold.

 

Our disaster recovery plan does not include redundant systems, and a disaster could severely damage our operations.

 

Our disaster recovery plan does not include fully redundant systems for our services at an alternate site. A disaster could severely harm our business because our services could be interrupted for an indeterminate length of time. Our operations depend upon our ability to maintain and protect the computer systems needed for the day-to-day operation of Saba Learning ASP Edition and our hosting services. A number of these computer systems are located on or near known earthquake fault zones. Although these systems are designed to be fault-tolerant, the systems are vulnerable to damage from fire, floods, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures, and other events. Additionally, we do not carry sufficient business insurance to compensate us for all potential losses that could occur.

 

We outsource the management and maintenance of our hosted and ASP solutions to third parties and will depend upon them to provide adequate management and maintenance services.

 

We rely on third parties to provide key components of our networks and systems. For instance, we rely on third-party Internet service providers to host our products for customers who desire to have these solutions hosted. We also rely on third-party communications service providers for the high-speed connections that link our and our Internet service providers’ Web servers and office systems to the Internet. Our reliance on third party providers limits our ability to control critical customer service functions and communications systems. Any Internet or communications systems failure or interruption could result in disruption of our service or loss or compromise of customer orders and data. These failures, especially if they are prolonged or repeated, would make our services less attractive to customers and tarnish our reputation.

 

We depend upon continuing relationships with third-party integrators who support our solutions.

 

Our success depends upon the acceptance and successful integration by customers of our products. We often rely on third-party systems integrators to assist with implementation of our products. We must continue to rely on these systems integrators even as we increase the size of our professional services group. If large systems integrators fail to continue to support our solution or commit resources to us, if any of our customers are not able to successfully integrate our solution or if we are unable to adequately train our existing systems integration partners, our business, operating results, and financial condition could suffer. Although we make reasonable efforts to ensure that our third party providers perform to our standards, we have only limited control over the level and quality of service provided by our current and future third-party integrators.

 

We may not be able to secure necessary funding in the future; additional funding may result in dilution to our stockholders.

 

We require substantial working capital to fund our business. We have had significant operating losses and negative cash flow from operations since inception and expect this to continue for the foreseeable future. We expect to use our available cash resources and credit facilities primarily to fund sales and marketing activities, research and development, and continued operations, and possibly make future acquisitions. We believe that our existing capital resources will be sufficient to meet our capital requirements for the next twelve months. However, if our capital requirements increase materially from those currently planned or if revenues fail to materialize, we may require additional financing sooner than anticipated. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders will be reduced, stockholders may experience dilution, or such equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock. Alternatively, or in addition to equity financing, we may incur additional debt to raise funds. Additional equity or debt financing may not be available when needed on terms favorable to us or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to develop or enhance our products and services, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures.

 

Our stock price may fluctuate substantially.

 

For example, from the beginning of fiscal 2004 through the end of fiscal 2005, the market price for our common stock fluctuated between $6.62 per share and $3.22 per share. The market price for our common stock may be affected by a number of factors, including those described above and the following:

 

    the announcement of new products and services or product and service enhancements by us or our competitors;

 

    actual or anticipated quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors;

 

    changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts that may follow our stock;

 

    developments in our industry, including announcements of significant acquisitions or strategic partnerships; and

 

    general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors.

 

In addition, the stock market in general, and Nasdaq National Market technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that

 

25


Table of Contents

have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. Broad market and industry trends may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. Volatility in the market price and trading volume of our common stock may prevent our stockholders from selling their shares profitably. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class-action litigation has often been initiated against that company. Class-action litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

 

The anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents could delay or prevent a change in control.

 

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws contain provisions that could make it harder for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors.

 

For example, if a potential acquiror were to make a hostile bid for us, the acquiror would not be able to call a special meeting of stockholders to remove our board of directors or act by written consent without a meeting. In addition, our board of directors has staggered terms that make it difficult to remove all directors at once. The acquiror would also be required to provide advance notice of its proposal to remove directors at an annual meeting. The acquiror will not be able to cumulate votes at a meeting, which will require the acquiror to hold more shares to gain representation on the board of directors than if cumulative voting were permitted.

 

Our board of directors also has the ability to issue preferred stock that would significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquiror. In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law limits business combination transactions with 15% stockholders that have not been approved by the board of directors. These provisions and other similar provisions make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without negotiation. These provisions may apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders.

 

Our board of directors could choose not to negotiate with an acquiror that it did not feel was in our strategic interests. If the acquiror was discouraged from offering to acquire us or prevented from successfully completing a hostile acquisition by our anti-takeover measures, our stockholders could lose the opportunity to sell their shares at a favorable price.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our borrowings and investments. Since August 2002, Saba has maintained a credit facility with a bank. The current credit facility grants Saba access to a revolving line of credit of $250,000, a new equipment term loan of up to $500,000 and a new term loan of up to $4.5 million. Borrowings on the revolving line of credit and new equipment term loan credit facilities may be made through March 2006.

 

On November 10, 2005, the Company amended the credit facility with the bank. The amended credit facility requires the Company to maintain a minimum balance of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of (a) $11 million as of any fiscal quarter end through May 31, 2006, (b) $10 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter from May 5, 2005 through September 15, 2005 and from December 1, 2005 through May 31, 2006, (c) $8 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter end from September 16, 2005 through November 29, 2005 (d) $9 million at any time during the period from June 1, 2006 through May 31, 2007, and (e) $7.5 million for any date thereafter.

 

As of November 30, 2005, Saba had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving line of credit and was in compliance with all of the covenants related to this credit facility. On January 13, 2006, the Company further amended the credit facility to require the Company to maintain a minimum balance of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of (a) $11 million as of any fiscal quarter end through May 31, 2006, (b) $10 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter from May 5, 2005 through September 15, 2005 and from March 1, 2006 through May 30, 2006, (c) $8 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter end from September 16, 2005 through November 29, 2005, (d) $7.5 million for any date that is not a fiscal quarter end from December 1, 2005 through February 27, 2006 (e) $9 million at any time during the period from May 31, 2006 through May 30, 2007, and (f) $7.5 million for any date thereafter.

 

Saba has and expects to continue to comply with the end of quarter cash covenants included in the credit facility. However, because of the variability in timing of accounts payable and accounts receivable within a quarter, the amendments to the credit facility have been and may continue to be necessary for Saba to remain compliant with the intra-quarter cash covenants. As a result of this intra-quarter variability, in the next twelve months Saba may not be compliant with the intra-quarter cash covenant and as a result, all outstanding amounts payable under the credit facility have been classified as a current liability in the accompanying balance sheet.

 

At November 30, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $13.7 million. Of this amount, approximately $2.3 million was invested in money market accounts bearing variable interest rates of between .75% and 3.8%. The remainder of our cash and cash equivalents is held in non-interest bearing accounts at several banks. Variable interest rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. A  1/2% change in interest rates would not be significant.

 

Foreign Currency Risk

 

We do not use derivative instruments to manage risks associated with foreign currency transactions in order to minimize the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on earnings. We provide our products and services to customers in the United States, Europe and elsewhere throughout the world. Sales are primarily made in U.S. dollars, and to a lesser but increasing extent, British pounds and Euros; however, as we continue to expand our operations, more of our contracts may be denominated in Australian dollars, Canadian dollars and Japanese yen. A strengthening of the U.S. dollar could make our products less competitive in foreign markets.

 

Our exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations also arises in part from inter-company accounts with our foreign subsidiaries. These inter-company accounts are typically denominated in the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary, and, when re-measured and translated in U.S. dollars, have an impact on our operating results depending upon the movement in foreign currency rates. During the three months ended November 30, 2005, our total realized and unrealized losses due to movements in foreign currencies was $76,000. As exchange rates vary, these foreign exchange results may vary and adversely or favorably impact operating results. An unfavorable change of 10% in foreign currency rates would not have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

26


Table of Contents

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

As of November 30, 2005, our management evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in this report. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

In November 2001, a complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against us, certain of our officers and directors, and certain underwriters of our initial public offering. The complaint was purportedly filed on behalf of a class of certain persons who purchased our common stock between April 6, 2000 and December 6, 2000. The complaint alleges violations by us and our officers and directors of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and other related provisions in connection with certain alleged compensation arrangements entered into by the underwriters in connection with the offering. An amended complaint was filed in April 2002. Similar complaints have been filed against hundreds of other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998. The complaints allege that the prospectus and the registration statement for the offering failed to disclose that the underwriters allegedly solicited and received “excessive” commissions from investors and that some investors in the IPO offering agreed with the underwriters to buy additional shares in the aftermarket in order to inflate the price of our stock. The complaints were later consolidated into a single action. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, attorney and expert fees, and other unspecified litigation costs.

 

On July 1, 2002, the underwriter defendants in the consolidated actions moved to dismiss all of the actions, including the action involving us. On July 15, 2002, we, along with other non-underwriter defendants in the coordinated cases, also moved to dismiss the litigation. On February 19, 2003, the Court ruled on the motions. The Court granted our motion to dismiss the claims against us under Rule 10b-5, due to the insufficiency of the allegations against us. The Court also granted the motion of the individual defendants, Bobby Yazdani and Terry Carlitz, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board and our former Chief Financial Officer and a member of our board of directors, to dismiss the claims against them under Rule 10b-5 and Section 20 of the Exchange Act. The motions to dismiss the claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act were denied as to virtually all of the defendants in the consolidated cases, including us.

 

On July 16, 2003, a committee of our board of directors conditionally approved a proposed partial settlement with the plaintiffs in this matter. The settlement would provide, among other things, a release of us and of the individual defendants for the conduct alleged in the action to be wrongful in the amended complaint. We would agree to undertake other responsibilities under the partial settlement, including agreeing to assign away, not assert, or release certain potential claims we may have against our underwriters. Any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is expected to be borne by our insurers.

 

In June 2004, an agreement of settlement was submitted to the Court for preliminary approval. The Court granted the preliminary approval motion on February 15, 2005, subject to certain modifications. On August 31, 2005 the Court issued a preliminary order further approving the modifications to the settlement and certifying the settlement classes. The Court also appointed the notice administrator for the settlement and ordered that notice of the settlement be distributed to all settlement class members by January 15, 2006. The settlement fairness hearing has been set for April 26, 2006. Following the hearing, if the Court determines that the settlement is fair to the class members, the settlement will be approved. There can be no assurance that this proposed settlement will be approved and implemented in its current form, or at all.

 

If the settlement process fails, we intend to dispute these claims and defend the law suit vigorously. However, due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of the litigation. An unfavorable outcome in litigation could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We are also party to various legal disputes and proceedings arising from the ordinary course of general business activities. While, in the opinion of management, resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, the ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain. Were an unfavorable outcome to occur, the impact could be material to us.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

The Risk Factors section may be found in the section titled “Factors that May Impact Future Operating Results” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

None.

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

The Company held its annual meeting of stockholders at the company headquarters on November 3, 2005. Of the 17,946,629 shares outstanding as of the record date, 13,361,763 shares were present or represented by proxy at the meeting. At the meeting, the following actions were voted upon:

 

a. To elect the following Class II director to serve for terms ending upon the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are duly elected or appointed:

 

     FOR

       WITHHELD    

Bobby Yazdani

   13,307,487    54,276

 

By virtue of the results of the vote above, Bobby Yazdani was elected to continue as a director of Saba. The terms of the following directors continued after the meeting: Joe E. Kiani, Clifton T. Weatherford, Douglas C. Allred, Larry D. Lenihan, Jr. and Michael J. Moritz.

 

b. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2006:

 

    FOR

     AGAINST  

     ABSTAIN  

    13,285,792    52,867    23,104

 

27


Table of Contents

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

 

On January 13, 2006, the Company entered into Amendment No. 6 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of January 13, 2006 by and between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank. The Amendment amended the minimum balance of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents in our outstanding credit facility. See Exhibit 10.3, Amendment No. 6, Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of January 13, 2006 by and between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank. There is no material relationship between us and Silicon Valley Bank other than the credit facility.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

 

a. Exhibits

 

See Exhibit Index following the signature page.

 

28


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

    SABA SOFTWARE, INC.

Dated: January 13, 2006

 

By:

 

/s/ Bobby Yazdani


       

Bobby Yazdani

       

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

       

(Principal Executive Officer)

   

By:

 

/s/ Peter E. Williams III


       

Peter E. Williams III

       

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

29


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

Number


 

Document


2.1 (1)   Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among the Company, Storm Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Holding”), Storm Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holding (the “Subsidiary”), THINQ Learning Solutions, Inc, a Delaware corporation and an unaffiliated entity (“THINQ”), and Daniel H. Bathon, Jr. as representative of the stockholders of THINQ.
2.2 (2)   Agreement and Plan of Reogranization, by and among the Company, Spruce Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Spruce Acquisition, LLS, a Delaware limited liability company that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and Centra Software, Inc., dated as of October 5, 2005.
3.1 (3)   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of April 12, 2000.
3.2(4)   Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company effective as of August 10, 2004.
3.3(5)   Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of May 12, 2003.
3.4(6)   Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of November 19, 2004.
4.1   Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4.
10.1(7)   Letter agreement between Mark D. Frost and the Company, dated September 1, 2005.
10.2(8)   Amendment No. 5 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2005 by and between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank.
10.3   Amendment No. 6, Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of January 13, 2006, by and between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank.
31.1   Certification of Bobby Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2   Certification of Peter E. Williams, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1   Certification of Bobby Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2   Certification of Peter E. Williams, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(1) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2005, previously filed with the SEC.
(2) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 6, 2005.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-95761) previously filed with the SEC.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2004, previously filed with the SEC.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2003, previously filed with the SEC.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2004, previously filed with the SEC.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2005, previously filed with the SEC.
(8) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 14, 2005.

 

30