FORM 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 1-15817

 

 

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

INDIANA   35-1539838
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
One Main Street
Evansville, Indiana
  47708
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(812) 464-1294

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (s232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   x    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock. The Registrant has one class of common stock (no par value) with 101,367,000 shares outstanding at March 31, 2013.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

 

     Page No.  

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

Item 1. Financial Statements

  

Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31, 2013 (unaudited), December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited)

     3   

Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) Three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

     4   

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) Three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

     5   

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited) Three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

     6   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) Three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

     7   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

     8   

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     55   

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     83   

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

     84   

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

     85   

SIGNATURES

     92   

 

2


Table of Contents

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

     March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  

(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

   2013     2012     2012  
     (unaudited)           (unaudited)  

Assets

      

Cash and due from banks

   $ 133,939      $ 218,276      $ 143,584   

Money market and other interest-earning investments

     19,964        45,784        16,857   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

     153,903        264,060        160,441   

Trading securities—at fair value

     3,217        3,097        2,972   

Investment securities—available-for-sale, at fair value

      

U.S. Treasury

     11,582        11,841        65,496   

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

     404,740        517,325        276,002   

Mortgage-backed securities

     1,548,011        1,193,984        1,295,776   

States and political subdivisions

     665,339        577,324        449,083   

Other securities

     218,738        200,310        165,825   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investment securities—available-for-sale

     2,848,410        2,500,784        2,252,182   

Investment securities—held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value $423,325, $433,201 and $496,356 respectively)

     392,379        402,828        472,377   

Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost

     37,927        37,927        30,835   

Residential loans held for sale, at fair value

     14,583        12,591        3,883   

Loans:

      

Commercial

     1,315,136        1,336,820        1,180,535   

Commercial real estate

     1,230,310        1,255,883        1,026,899   

Residential real estate

     1,352,679        1,324,703        1,059,977   

Consumer credit, net of unearned income

     887,520        906,855        847,274   

Covered loans, net of discount

     326,397        372,333        548,552   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans

     5,112,042        5,196,594        4,663,237   

Allowance for loan losses

     (47,313     (49,047     (54,726

Allowance for loan losses—covered loans

     (6,168     (5,716     (1,190
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loans

     5,058,561        5,141,831        4,607,321   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FDIC indemnification asset

     109,861        116,624        154,301   

Premises and equipment, net

     89,847        89,868        73,089   

Accrued interest receivable

     46,575        46,979        42,281   

Goodwill

     338,820        338,820        253,177   

Other intangible assets

     26,695        29,220        31,603   

Company-owned life insurance

     272,273        270,629        250,164   

Assets held for sale

     10,353        15,047        16,816   

Other real estate owned and repossessed personal property

     9,103        11,179        6,474   

Other real estate owned—covered

     26,114        26,137        24,705   

Other assets

     235,070        236,002        198,437   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 9,673,691      $ 9,543,623      $ 8,581,058   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities

      

Deposits:

      

Noninterest-bearing demand

   $ 1,973,265      $ 2,007,770      $ 1,767,972   

Interest-bearing:

      

NOW

     1,691,231        1,827,665        1,558,007   

Savings

     1,916,880        1,869,377        1,672,196   

Money market

     294,744        292,860        295,347   

Time

     1,190,199        1,281,281        1,374,255   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deposits

     7,066,319        7,278,953        6,667,777   

Short-term borrowings

     644,021        589,815        352,758   

Other borrowings

     536,798        237,493        289,477   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     226,888        242,797        220,635   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     8,474,026        8,349,058        7,530,647   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Shareholders’ Equity

      

Preferred stock, series A, 1,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding

     —          —          —     

Common stock, $1 stated value, 150,000 shares authorized, 101,367, 101,179 and 94,674 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

     101,367        101,179        94,674   

Capital surplus

     917,064        916,918        833,976   

Retained earnings

     160,416        146,667        103,034   

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

     20,818        29,801        18,727   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

     1,199,665        1,194,565        1,050,411   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   $ 9,673,691      $ 9,543,623      $ 8,581,058   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended  
     March 31,  

(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

   2013     2012  

Interest Income

    

Loans including fees:

    

Taxable

   $ 64,218      $ 62,130   

Nontaxable

     2,179        2,219   

Investment securities, available-for-sale:

    

Taxable

     11,072        11,344   

Nontaxable

     4,550        3,580   

Investment securities, held-to-maturity, taxable

     4,070        4,975   

Money market and other interest-earning investments

     13        15   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest income

     86,102        84,263   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest Expense

    

Deposits

     5,268        7,682   

Short-term borrowings

     267        127   

Other borrowings

     1,517        2,181   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

     7,052        9,990   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

     79,050        74,273   

Provision for loan losses

     845        2,056   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     78,205        72,217   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Noninterest Income

    

Wealth management fees

     5,656        5,096   

Service charges on deposit accounts

     11,098        12,862   

ATM fees

     5,798        6,333   

Mortgage banking revenue

     1,273        559   

Insurance premiums and commissions

     10,943        9,614   

Investment product fees

     3,583        2,931   

Company-owned life insurance

     1,644        1,495   

Net securities gains

     1,019        619   

Total other-than-temporary impairment losses

     —          (96

Loss recognized in other comprehensive income

     —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impairment losses recognized in earnings

     —          (96

Gain (loss) on derivatives

     (12     182   

Gain on sale leaseback transactions

     1,584        1,607   

Gain on branch divestitures—deposit premium

     2,244        —     

Change in FDIC indemnification asset

     (2,302     4,764   

Other income

     3,787        3,167   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total noninterest income

     46,315        49,133   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Noninterest Expense

    

Salaries and employee benefits

     50,960        46,046   

Occupancy

     12,084        12,460   

Equipment

     2,898        2,856   

Marketing

     1,205        1,442   

Data processing

     5,232        5,469   

Communication

     2,566        2,824   

Professional fees

     3,669        2,724   

Loan expense

     1,616        1,608   

Supplies

     569        758   

FDIC assessment

     1,652        1,395   

Other real estate owned expense

     1,014        9,807   

Amortization of intangibles

     2,525        2,021   

Other expense

     4,193        1,877   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total noninterest expense

     90,183        91,287   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

     34,337        30,063   

Income tax expense

     10,392        8,340   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   $ 23,945      $ 21,723   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per common share—basic

   $ 0.24      $ 0.23   

Net income per common share—diluted

     0.24        0.23   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding-basic

     101,081        94,445   

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding-diluted

     101,547        94,833   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends per common share

   $ 0.10      $ 0.09   

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended  
     March 31,  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012  

Net income

   $ 23,945      $ 21,723   

Other comprehensive income

    

Change in securities available-for-sale:

    

Unrealized holding gains (losses) for the period

     (13,783     6,240   

Reclassification adjustment for securities gains realized in income

     (1,019     (619

Other-than-temporary-impairment on available-for-sale securities associated with credit loss realized in income

     —          96   

Income tax effect

     5,409        (2,316
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

     (9,393     3,401   

Change in securities held-to-maturity:

    

Amortization of fair value for securities held-to-maturity previously recognized into accumulated other comprehensive income

     (177     (230

Income tax effect

     71        92   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Changes from securities held-to-maturity

     (106     (138

Cash flow hedges:

    

Net unrealized derivative gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

     —          (240

Income tax effect

     —          96   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Changes from cash flow hedges

     —          (144

Defined benefit pension plans:

    

Amortization of net loss recognized in income

     860        1,007   

Income tax effect

     (344     (403
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Changes from defined benefit pension plans

     516        604   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

     (8,983     3,723   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

   $ 14,962      $ 25,446   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)

 

(dollars and shares

in thousands)

   Common
Stock
    Capital
Surplus
    Retained
Earnings
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
    Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 

Balance, December 31, 2011

   $ 94,654      $ 834,033      $ 89,865      $ 15,004      $ 1,033,556   

Net income

     —          —          21,723        —          21,723   

Other comprehensive income

     —          —          —          3,723        3,723   

Dividends—common stock

     —          —          (8,510     —          (8,510

Common stock issued

     5        55        —          —          60   

Common stock repurchased

     (55     (631     —          —          (686

Stock based compensation expense

     —          499        —          —          499   

Stock activity under incentive comp plans

     70        20        (44     —          46   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2012

   $ 94,674      $ 833,976      $ 103,034      $ 18,727      $ 1,050,411   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

   $ 101,179      $ 916,918      $ 146,667      $ 29,801      $ 1,194,565   

Net income

     —          —          23,945        —          23,945   

Other comprehensive income

     —          —          —          (8,983     (8,983

Dividends—common stock

     —          —          (10,124     —          (10,124

Common stock issued

     6        61        —          —          67   

Common stock repurchased

     (87     (1,088     —          —          (1,175

Stock based compensation expense

     —          1,023        —          —          1,023   

Stock activity under incentive comp plans

     269        150        (72     —          347   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2013

   $ 101,367      $ 917,064      $ 160,416      $ 20,818      $ 1,199,665   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended  
     March 31,  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012  

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

    

Net income

   $ 23,945      $ 21,723   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation

     2,501        2,295   

Amortization and impairment of other intangible assets

     2,525        2,021   

Net premium amortization on investment securities

     10,807        3,728   

Change in FDIC indemnification asset

     2,302        (4,764

Stock compensation expense

     1,023        499   

Provision for loan losses

     845        2,056   

Net securities gains

     (1,019     (619

Impairment on available-for-sale securities

     —          96   

Gain on branch divestitures

     (2,244     —     

Gain on sale leasebacks

     (1,584     (1,607

(Gain) loss on derivatives

     12        (182

Net (gains) losses on sales and write-downs of loans and other assets

     (1,147     (374

Loss on retirement of debt

     706        —      

Increase in cash surrender value of company owned life insurance

     (1,644     (1,471

Residential real estate loans originated for sale

     (33,836     (12,003

Proceeds from sale of residential real estate loans

     32,701        13,022   

Decrease in interest receivable

     403        2,520   

Decrease in other real estate owned

     2,099        6,383   

Decrease in other assets

     4,658        4,760   

Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities

     (13,402     (25,691
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total adjustments

     5,706        (9,331
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows provided by operating activities

     29,651        12,392   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

    

Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale

     (598,663     (290,983

Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls of investment securities available-for-sale

     221,741        100,032   

Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale

     11,970        13,423   

Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls of investment securities held-to-maturity

     3,000        11,157   

Proceeds on branch divestitures

     (144,236     —     

Proceeds from sale of loans

     3,187        782   

Reimbursements under FDIC loss share agreements

     3,923        20,372   

Net principal collected from (loans made to) loan customers

     79,238        98,983   

Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment and other assets

     2,904        3   

Purchases of premises and equipment and other assets

     (2,851     (3,475
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows used in investing activities

     (419,787     (49,706
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

    

Net increase (decrease) in deposits and short-term borrowings:

    

Deposits

     (62,499     56,214   

Short-term borrowings

     54,206        (72,091

Payments for maturities on other borrowings

     (112     (104

Payments related to retirement of debt

     (25,706     —     

Proceeds from issuance of other borrowings

     325,000        —     

Cash dividends paid on common stock

     (10,124     (8,510

Common stock repurchased

     (1,175     (686

Proceeds from exercise of stock options, including tax benefit

     322        —     

Common stock issued

     67        60   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

     279,979        (25,117
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     (110,157     (62,431

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     264,060        222,872   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 153,903      $ 160,441   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

    

Total interest paid

   $ 7,308      $ 10,608   

Total taxes paid (net of refunds)

   $ 4,079      $ 2,600   

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

NOTE 1—BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Old National Bancorp and its wholly-owned affiliates (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Old National”) and have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing practices within the banking industry. Such principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for loan losses, valuation of purchased loans, valuation and impairment of securities, goodwill and intangibles, derivative financial instruments, and income taxes are particularly subject to change. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements contain all the normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position of Old National as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, and December 31, 2012, and the results of its operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. Interim results do not necessarily represent annual results. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Old National’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012.

All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2013 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity.

NOTE 2 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

FASB ASC 805 – In October 2012, the FASB issued an update (ASU No. 2012-06, Subsequent Accounting for an Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition Date as a Result of a Government-Assisted Acquisition of a Financial Institution) impacting FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations. This update specifies that when an entity recognizes an indemnification asset as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution and subsequently a change in the cash flows expected to be collected on the indemnification asset occurs, the entity should subsequently account for the change in the measurement of the indemnification asset on the same basis as the change in the assets subject to indemnification. Any amortization of changes in value should be limited to the contractual term of the indemnification agreement (the lesser of the term of the indemnification agreement and the remaining life of the indemnified assets). This update became effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2012, and is consistent with the Company’s current accounting treatment of changes in expected cash flows and the indemnification asset and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASC 220 – In February 2013, the FASB issued an update (ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income) impacting FASB ASC 220, Comprehensive Income. This update requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. An entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about these amounts. This update became effective for the Company for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASC 405 – In February 2013, the FASB issued an update (ASU No. 2013-04, Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date) impacting FASB ASC 405, Liabilities. This update requires an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of the guidance is fixed at the reporting date as the sum of (1) the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and (2) any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. This update also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. This update becomes effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.

 

8


Table of Contents

NOTE 3 – ACQUISITION AND DIVESTITURE ACTIVITY

Indiana Community Bancorp

On September 15, 2012, Old National acquired 100% of Indiana Community Bancorp (“IBT”) in an all stock transaction. IBT was headquartered in Columbus, Indiana and had 17 full-service banking centers serving the South Central Indiana area. The acquisition increased Old National’s position as the third largest branch network in Indiana and allowed Old National to enter into the vibrant, growing region of south central Indiana in a rapid and cost effective manner. We also believe there are opportunities to enhance income and improve efficiencies. Pursuant to the merger agreement, the shareholders of IBT received approximately 6.6 million shares of Old National Bancorp stock valued at approximately $88.5 million.

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total estimated purchase price is allocated to IBT’s net tangible and intangible assets based on their current estimated fair values on the date of the acquisition. Based on management’s preliminary valuation of the fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which are based on assumptions that are subject to change, the purchase price for the IBT acquisition is allocated as follows (in thousands):

 

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 78,540   

Investment securities —available for sale

     147,710   

Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost

     7,092   

Loans

     497,434   

Premises and equipment

     13,465   

Accrued interest receivable

     2,165   

Other real estate owned

     6,111   

Company-owned life insurance

     15,833   

Other assets

     49,298   

Deposits

     (784,589

Other borrowings

     (15,464

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     (17,765
  

 

 

 

Net tangible assets acquired

     (170

Definite-lived intangible assets acquired

     3,024   

Goodwill

     85,643   
  

 

 

 

Purchase price

   $ 88,497   
  

 

 

 

Prior to the end of the one year measurement period for finalizing the purchase price allocation, if information becomes available which would indicate adjustments are required to the purchase price allocation, such adjustments will be included in the purchase price allocation retrospectively. During the fourth quarter of 2012, adjustments were made in the purchase price allocation that affected the amounts allocated to loans, other real estate owned, other assets, accrued expenses and other liabilities and goodwill.

Of the total purchase price, $0.2 million has been allocated to net tangible liabilities acquired and $3.0 million has been allocated to definite-lived intangible assets acquired. The remaining purchase price has been allocated to goodwill. The goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes and is included in the “Community Banking” and “Other” segments, as described in Note 20 of these consolidated financial statement footnotes.

 

9


Table of Contents

The components of the estimated fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets are in the table below. These intangible assets will be amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated lives and are included in the “Community Banking” and “Other” segments, as described in Note 20 of these consolidated financial statement footnotes.

 

     Estimated
Fair Value
(in millions)
     Estimated
Useful Lives (Years)
 

Core deposit intangible

   $ 1.3         7   

Trust customer relationship intangible

   $ 1.7         12   

Integra Bank N.A.

On July 29, 2011, Old National acquired the banking operations of Integra Bank N.A. in an FDIC assisted transaction. As part of the purchase and assumption agreement, the Company and the FDIC entered into loss sharing agreements whereby the FDIC will cover a substantial portion of any future losses on loans (and related unfunded commitments), other real estate owned and up to 90 days of certain accrued interest on loans. The acquired loans and OREO subject to the loss sharing agreements are referred to collectively as “covered assets.”

Under the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will reimburse Old National for 80% of losses up to $275.0 million, losses in excess of $275.0 million up to $467.2 million at 0% reimbursement, and 80% of losses in excess of $467.2 million. Old National will reimburse the FDIC for its share of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC has reimbursed the Bank under the loss sharing agreements. The loss sharing provisions of the agreements for commercial and single family residential mortgage loans are in effect for five and ten years, respectively, from the July 29, 2011 acquisition date and the loss recovery provisions for such loans are in effect for eight years and ten years, respectively, from the acquisition date.

Integra was a full service community bank headquartered in Evansville, Indiana that operated 52 branch locations. We entered into this transaction due to the attractiveness in the pricing of the acquired loan portfolio, including the indemnification assets, and the attractiveness of immediate low cost core deposits. We also believed there were opportunities to enhance income and improve efficiencies. We believe participating with the FDIC in this assisted transaction was advantageous to the Company.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. The assets and liabilities, both tangible and intangible, were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the July 29, 2011 acquisition date. The application of the acquisition method of accounting resulted in the recognition of $16.9 million of goodwill and $4.3 million of core deposit intangible, after tax. The goodwill represents the excess of the estimated fair value of the liabilities assumed over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and is influenced significantly by the FDIC-assisted transaction process. Goodwill of $29.0 million is deductible for income tax purposes.

 

10


Table of Contents

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total estimated purchase price is allocated to Integra’s net tangible and intangible assets based on their current estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The purchase price of $170.8 million was allocated as follows (in thousands):

 

(dollars in thousands)

      

Assets Acquired

  

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 314,954   

Investment securities—available for sale

     453,700   

Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost

     15,226   

Residential loans held for sale

     1,690   

Loans—covered

     727,330   

Loans—non-covered

     56,828   

Premises and equipment

     19,713   

Other real estate owned

     34,055   

Accrued interest receivable

     4,751   

Goodwill

     16,864   

Other intangible assets

     4,291   

FDIC indemnification asset

     167,949   

Other assets

     9,999   
  

 

 

 

Assets acquired

   $ 1,827,350   
  

 

 

 

Liabilities Assumed

  

Deposits

   $ 1,443,209   

Short-term borrowings

     7,654   

Other borrowings

     192,895   

FDIC settlement payable

     170,759   

Other liabilities

     12,833   
  

 

 

 

Liabilities assumed

   $ 1,827,350   
  

 

 

 

Divestiture

On August 16, 2012, Old National announced plans to sell the deposits of nine banking centers located in southern Illinois and western Kentucky. As such, these deposits were considered held for sale as of December 31, 2012. The deposits totaled approximately $150.0 million at December 31, 2012. Old National also announced plans to consolidate 19 banking centers into existing branch locations. The consolidations occurred during the fourth quarter of 2012 and the sales closed during the first quarter of 2013. Deposits at the time of sale were approximately $150.1 million and the Company received a deposit premium of $2.2 million on the sales during the first quarter of 2013.

Pending Acquisition

On January 9, 2013 Old National announced that it had entered into a purchase and assumption agreement to acquire 24 bank branches of Bank of America. Four of the branches are located in northern Indiana and 20 branches are located in southwest Michigan. Deposit and loan balances to be included in the transaction were $745.2 million and $8.1 million, respectively, as of March 2013. The Company will pay a deposit premium of 2.94%. The acquisition will double Old National’s presence in the South Bend/Elkhart area and provide a logical market extension into southwest Michigan. The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2013 subject to approval by federal and state regulatory authorities.

 

11


Table of Contents

NOTE 4—NET INCOME PER SHARE

The following table reconciles basic and diluted net income per share for the three months ended March 31:

 

(dollars and shares in thousands,    Three Months Ended      Three Months Ended  

except per share data)

   March 31, 2013      March 31, 2012  

Basic Earnings Per Share

     

Net income

   $ 23,945       $ 21,723   

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     101,081         94,445   

Basic Earnings Per Share

   $ 0.24       $ 0.23   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted Earnings Per Share

     

Net income

   $ 23,945       $ 21,723   

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     101,081         94,445   

Effect of dilutive securities:

     

Restricted stock

     439         369   

Stock options (1)

     27         19   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

     101,547         94,833   

Diluted Earnings Per Share

   $ 0.24       $ 0.23   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Options to purchase 1,025 shares and 3,106 shares outstanding at March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were not included in the computation of net income per diluted share because the exercise price of these options was greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would antidilutive.

NOTE 5 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following tables summarize the changes within each classification of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) net of tax for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and summarizes the significant amounts reclassified out of each component of AOCI:

 

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income by Component  

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 (a)

 
     Unrealized Gains     Unrealized Gains     Defined        
     and Losses on     and Losses on     Benefit        
     Available-for-Sale     Held-to-Maturity     Pension        
     Securities     Securities     Plans     Total  

AOCI at January 1, 2013

   $ 39,054      $ 3,269      $ (12,522   $ 29,801   

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

     (8,746     —          —          (8,746

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (b)

     (647     (106     516        (237
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net current-period other comprehensive income

     (9,393     (106     516        (8,983
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

AOCI at March 31, 2013

   $ 29,661      $ 3,163      $ (12,006   $ 20,818   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a) All amounts are net of tax. Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.
(b) See table below for details about reclassifications.

 

12


Table of Contents
Reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 (a)

Details about Accumulated Other    Amount Reclassified from Accumulated     Affected Line Item in the Statement

Comprehensive Income Components

   Other Comprehensive Income    

Where Net Income is Presented

Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities

    
   $ 1,019      Realized gain/(loss) on sale of securities
     —        Impairment losses
  

 

 

   
     1,019      Total before tax
     (372   Tax (expense) or benefit
  

 

 

   
   $ 647      Net of tax
  

 

 

   

Unrealized gains and losses on held-to-maturity securities

    
   $ 177      Interest income/(expense)
     (71   Tax (expense) or benefit
  

 

 

   
   $ 106      Net of tax
  

 

 

   

Amortization of defined benefit pension items

    

Acturial gains/(losses)

   $ (860   (b)
     344      Tax (expense) or benefit
  

 

 

   
   $ (516   Net of tax
  

 

 

   

Total reclassifications for the period

   $ 237      Net of tax
  

 

 

   

 

(a) Amounts in parentheses indicate debits to profit/loss.
(b) This accumulated other comprehensive income component is included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 14 for additional details on our pension plans.

The following tables summarize the changes within each classification of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) net of tax for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and summarizes the significant amounts reclassified out of each component of AOCI:

 

     Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income by Component  
     For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 (a)  
     Unrealized Gains     Unrealized Gains     Gains and     Defined        
     and Losses on     and Losses on     Losses on     Benefit        
     Available-for-Sale     Held-to-Maturity     Cash Flow     Pension        
     Securities     Securities     Hedges     Plans     Total  

Balance at January 1, 2012

   $ 24,612      $ 4,745      $ 145      $ (14,498   $ 15,004   

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

     3,712        —          —          —          3,712   

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (b)

     (311     (138     (144     604        11   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net current-period other comprehensive income

     3,401        (138     (144     604        3,723   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2012

   $ 28,013      $ 4,607      $ 1      $ (13,894   $ 18,727   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a) All amounts are net of tax. Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.
(b) See table below for details about reclassifications.

 

13


Table of Contents
Reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Details about Accumulated Other    Amount Reclassified from Accumulated     Affected Line Item in the Statement

Comprehensive Income Components

   Other Comprehensive Income    

Where Net Income is Presented

Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities

    
   $ 619      Realized gain/(loss) on sale of securities
     (96   Impairment losses
  

 

 

   
     523      Total before tax
     (212   Tax (expense) or benefit
  

 

 

   
   $ 311      Net of tax
  

 

 

   

Unrealized gains and losses on held-to-maturity securities

    
   $ 230      Interest income/(expense)
     (92   Tax (expense) or benefit
  

 

 

   
   $ 138      Net of tax
  

 

 

   

Gains and losses on cash flow hedges

    

Interest rate contracts

   $ 240      Interest income/(expense)
     (96   Tax (expense) or benefit
  

 

 

   
   $ 144      Net of tax
  

 

 

   

Amortization of defined benefit pension items

    

Acturial gains/(losses)

   $ (1,007   (b)
     403      Tax (expense) or benefit
  

 

 

   
   $ (604   Net of tax
  

 

 

   

Total reclassifications for the period

   $ (11   Net of tax
  

 

 

   

 

(a) Amounts in parentheses indicate debits to profit/loss.
(b) This accumulated other comprehensive income component is included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 14 for additional details on our pension plans.

 

14


Table of Contents

NOTE 6—INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the corresponding amounts of unrealized gains and losses therein:

 

     Amortized      Unrealized      Unrealized     Fair  

(dollars in thousands)

   Cost      Gains      Losses     Value  

March 31, 2013

          

Available-for-sale

          

U.S. Treasury

   $ 11,202       $ 380       $ —        $ 11,582   

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

     403,657         2,163         (1,080     404,740   

Mortgage-backed securities—Agency

     1,492,324         31,587         (3,923     1,519,988   

Mortgage-backed securities—Non-agency

     27,281         971         (229     28,023   

States and political subdivisions

     639,805         30,788         (5,254     665,339   

Pooled trust preferred securities

     23,137         —           (14,583     8,554   

Other securities

     201,791         9,950         (1,557     210,184   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale securities

   $ 2,799,197       $ 75,839       $ (26,626   $ 2,848,410   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Held-to-maturity

          

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

   $ 173,120       $ 13,848       $ —        $ 186,968   

Mortgage-backed securities—Agency

     50,187         2,485         —          52,672   

States and political subdivisions

     169,072         14,613         —          183,685   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total held-to-maturity securities

   $ 392,379       $ 30,946       $ —        $ 423,325   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

          

Available-for-sale

          

U.S. Treasury

   $ 11,437       $ 404       $ —        $ 11,841   

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

     515,469         2,794         (938     517,325   

Mortgage-backed securities—Agency

     1,130,991         33,244         (447     1,163,788   

Mortgage-backed securities—Non-agency

     29,359         1,175         (338     30,196   

States and political subdivisions

     542,559         35,805         (1,040     577,324   

Pooled trust preferred securities

     24,884         —           (15,525     9,359   

Other securities

     182,070         10,473         (1,592     190,951   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale securities

   $ 2,436,769       $ 83,895       $ (19,880   $ 2,500,784   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Held-to-maturity

          

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

   $ 173,936       $ 14,327       $ —        $ 188,263   

Mortgage-backed securities—Agency

     56,612         2,307         —          58,919   

States and political subdivisions

     169,282         13,739         —          183,021   

Other securities

     2,998         —           —          2,998   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total held-to-maturity securities

   $ 402,828       $ 30,373       $ —        $ 433,201   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

15


Table of Contents

All of the mortgage-backed securities in the investment portfolio are residential mortgage-backed securities. The amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities portfolio are shown by expected maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Weighted average yield is based on amortized cost.

 

     March 31, 2013      Weighted  
(dollars in thousands)    Amortized      Fair      Average  

Maturity

   Cost      Value      Yield  

Available-for-sale

        

Within one year

   $ 20,098       $ 20,338         3.52

One to five years

     123,271         129,738         3.24   

Five to ten years

     530,622         543,216         2.52   

Beyond ten years

     2,125,206         2,155,118         2.86   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,799,197       $ 2,848,410         2.82
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Held-to-maturity

        

Within one year

   $ 67       $ 67         2.74

One to five years

     17,150         18,187         4.30   

Five to ten years

     129,340         137,888         2.77   

Beyond ten years

     245,822         267,183         4.51   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 392,379       $ 423,325         3.92
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

16


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the investment securities with unrealized losses at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 by aggregated major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position:

 

     Less than 12 months     12 months or longer     Total  
     Fair      Unrealized     Fair      Unrealized     Fair      Unrealized  

(dollars in thousands)

   Value      Losses     Value      Losses     Value      Losses  

March 31, 2013

               

Available-for-Sale

               

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

   $ 231,588       $ (1,080   $ —         $ —        $ 231,588       $ (1,080

Mortgage-backed securities—Agency

     423,162         (3,923     —           —          423,162         (3,923

Mortgage-backed securities—Non-agency

     —            —          5,640         (229     5,640         (229

States and political subdivisions

     189,385         (5,253     960         (1     190,345         (5,254

Pooled trust preferred securities

     —           —          8,554         (14,583     8,554         (14,583

Other securities

     42,594         (384     6,920         (1,173     49,514         (1,557
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale

   $ 886,729       $ (10,640   $ 22,074       $ (15,986   $ 908,803       $ (26,626
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

               

Available-for-Sale

               

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

   $ 201,151       $ (938   $ —         $ —        $ 201,151       $ (938

Mortgage-backed securities—Agency

     64,213         (447     —            —          64,213         (447

Mortgage-backed securities—Non-agency

     —            —           5,696         (338     5,696         (338

States and political subdivisions

     63,311         (1,040     —           —          63,311         (1,040

Pooled trust preferred securities

     —           —          9,359         (15,525     9,359         (15,525

Other securities

     23,617         (162     6,658         (1,430     30,275         (1,592
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale

   $ 352,292       $ (2,587   $ 21,713       $ (17,293   $ 374,005       $ (19,880
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available for sale were $133.4 million and $33.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Gains of $0.7 million and $0.5 million were realized on these sales during 2013 and 2012, respectively. Also included in net securities gains for the first three months of 2013 is $101 thousand of gains associated with the trading securities and $195 thousand of gains from mutual funds. There are no other-than-temporary impairment charges related to credit loss in the first three months of 2013. Impacting earnings in the first three months of 2012 was $101 thousand of gains associated with the trading securities and other-than-temporary impairment charges related to credit loss on three non-agency mortgage-backed securities in the amount of $96 thousand.

Trading securities, which consist of mutual funds held in a trust associated with deferred compensation plans for former Monroe Bancorp directors and executives, are recorded at fair value and totaled $3.2 million at March 31, 2013 and $3.1 million at December 31, 2012.

During the third quarter of 2012, approximately $46.1 million of state and political subdivision securities were transferred from the held-to-maturity portfolio to the available-for-sale portfolio due to changes in circumstances associated with the Office of Management and Budget’s report outlining sequestration and the implications for taxable Build America Bonds.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. The investment securities portfolio is evaluated for OTTI by segregating the portfolio into two general segments and applying the appropriate OTTI model. Investment securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity are generally evaluated for OTTI under FASB ASC 320 (SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities). However, certain purchased beneficial interests, including non-agency mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, and collateralized debt obligations, that had credit ratings at the time of purchase of below AA are evaluated using the model outlined in FASB ASC 325-10 (EITF Issue No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continue to be Held by a Transfer in Securitized Financial Assets).

 

17


Table of Contents

In determining OTTI under the FASB ASC 320 (SFAS No. 115) model, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time. The second segment of the portfolio uses the OTTI guidance provided by FASB ASC 325-10 (EITF 99-20) that is specific to purchased beneficial interests that, on the purchase date, were rated below AA. Under the FASB ASC 325-10 model, the Company compares the present value of the remaining cash flows as estimated at the preceding evaluation date to the current expected remaining cash flows. An OTTI is deemed to have occurred if there has been an adverse change in the remaining expected future cash flows.

When other-than-temporary-impairment occurs under either model, the amount of the other-than-temporary-impairment recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the other-than-temporary-impairment shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. Otherwise, the other-than-temporary-impairment shall be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary-impairment related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary-impairment related to other factors shall be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the other-than-temporary-impairment recognized in earnings shall become the new amortized cost basis of the investment.

There was no other-than-temporary-impairment recorded in the first quarter of 2013. In the first quarter of 2012, $96 thousand of other-than-temporary-impairment was recorded.

As of March 31, 2013, Old National’s securities portfolio consisted of 1,323 securities, 141 of which were in an unrealized loss position. The majority of unrealized losses are related to the Company’s pooled trust preferred securities and are discussed below.

Pooled Trust Preferred Securities

At March 31, 2013, the Company’s securities portfolio contained five pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of $8.6 million and unrealized losses of $14.6 million. Three of the pooled trust preferred securities in our portfolio fall within the scope of FASB ASC 325-10 (EITF 99-20) and have a fair value of $2.6 million with unrealized losses of $6.2 million at March 31, 2013. These securities were rated A2 and A3 at inception, but at March 31, 2013, one security was rated CC, one security was rated C and one security D. The issuers in these securities are primarily banks, but some of the pools do include a limited number of insurance companies. The Company uses the OTTI evaluation model to compare the present value of expected cash flows to the previous estimate to determine whether an adverse change in cash flows has occurred during the quarter. The OTTI model considers the structure and term of the collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments of the underlying issuers, and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the model include expected future default rates and prepayments. We assume no recoveries on defaults and a limited number of recoveries on current or projected interest payment deferrals. In addition, we use the model to “stress” each CDO, or make assumptions more severe than expected activity, to determine the degree to which assumptions could deteriorate before the CDO could no longer fully support repayment of Old National’s note class. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, our model indicated no other-than-temporary-impairment losses on these securities. During the first quarter of 2013 one of these securities was sold. The Company recorded a gain of $224 thousand associated with this sale. At March 31, 2013, the Company has no intent to sell any of these securities that are in an unrealized loss position.

 

18


Table of Contents

Two of our pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of $6.0 million and unrealized losses of $8.3 million at March 31, 2013 are not subject to FASB ASC 325-10. These securities are evaluated using collateral-specific assumptions to estimate the expected future interest and principal cash flows. Our analysis indicated no other-than-temporary-impairment on these securities.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the six securities subject to FASB ASC 325-10 accounted for $6.8 million of the unrealized losses in the pooled trust preferred securities category. Our analysis indicated no other-than-temporary-impairment on these securities.

Two of our pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of $3.4 million and unrealized losses of $10.9 million at March 31, 2012 were not subject to FASB ASC 325-10. These securities were evaluated using collateral-specific assumptions to estimate the expected future interest and principal cash flows. Our analysis indicated no other-than-temporary-impairment on these securities.

The table below summarizes the relevant characteristics of our five pooled trust preferred securities as well as five single issuer trust preferred securities which are included with other securities in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. Each of the pooled trust preferred securities support a more senior tranche of security holders except for the MM Community Funding II security which, due to payoffs, Old National is now in the most senior class.

As depicted in the table below, all five securities have experienced credit defaults. However, two of these securities have excess subordination and are not other-than-temporarily-impaired as a result of their class hierarchy which provides more loss protection.

 

                                                                    
                                                     Actual     Expected     Excess  
                                                     Deferrals and     Defaults as     Subordination  
                                              # of Issuers      Defaults as a     a % of     as a %  
Trust preferred securities           Lowest                    Unrealized     Realized      Currently      Percent of     Remaining     of Current  
March 31, 2013           Credit      Amortized      Fair      Gain/     Losses      Performing/      Original     Performing     Performing  

(Dollars in Thousands)

   Class      Rating (1)      Cost      Value      (Loss)     2013      Remaining      Collateral     Collateral     Collateral  

Pooled trust preferred securities:

                          

MM Community Funding IX

     B-2         CC       $ 2,067       $ 773       $ (1,294   $ —           15/28         32.0     7.2     0.0

Reg Div Funding 2004

     B-2         D         4,012         542         (3,470     —           24/44         42.8     6.1     0.0

Pretsl XII

     B-1         C         2,732         1,253         (1,479     —           46/71         25.8     7.3     0.0

Pretsl XXVII LTD

     B         CC         4,916         1,288         (3,628     —           33/47         25.1     4.7     33.9

Trapeza Ser 13A

     A2A         B         9,410         4,698         (4,712     —           43/53         27.6     5.4     38.1
        

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

           
           23,137         8,554         (14,583     —               

Single Issuer trust preferred securities:

   

                       

First Empire Cap (M&T)

        BB+         957         1,012         55        —               

First Empire Cap (M&T)

        BB+         2,909         3,035         126        —               

Fleet Cap Tr V (BOA)

        BB         3,367         2,782         (585     —               

JP Morgan Chase Cap XIII

        BBB         4,726         4,137         (589     —               

NB-Global

        BB         723         795         72        —               
        

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

           
           12,682         11,761         (921     —               

Total

         $ 35,819       $ 20,315       $ (15,504   $ —               
        

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

           

 

(1) Lowest rating for the security provided by any nationally recognized credit rating agency.

 

19


Table of Contents

The following table details all securities with other-than-temporary-impairment, their credit rating at March 31, 2013, and the related life-to-date credit losses recognized in earnings:

 

                          Amount of other-than-temporary  
                          impairment recognized in earnings  
                          Three Months                                     
            Lowest             ended                                     
            Credit      Amortized      March 31,      Year ended December 31,      Life-to  
     Vintage      Rating (1)      Cost      2013      2012      2011      2010      2009      date  

Non-agency mortgage-backed securities:

  

                       

BAFC Ser 4

     2007         CCC       $ 11,275       $ —         $ 299       $ —         $ 79       $ 63       $ 441   

CWALT Ser 73CB

     2005         D         2,406         —           151         —           207         83         441   

CWALT Ser 73CB

     2005         D         3,463         —           35         —           427         182         644   

CWHL 2006-10 (2)

     2006            —           —           —           —           309         762         1,071   

CWHL 2005-20

     2005            —           —           —           —           39         72         111   

FHASI Ser 4 (2)

     2007            —           —           —           340         629         223         1,192   

HALO Ser 1R (2)

     2006            —           —           133         16         —           —           149   

RFMSI Ser S9 (2)

     2006            —           —           —           —           923         1,880         2,803   

RFMSI Ser S10

     2006         D         2,995         —           178         165         76         249         668   

RALI QS2 (2)

     2006            —           —           —           —           278         739         1,017   

RAST A9

     2004            —           —           142         —           —           —           142   

RFMSI S1(2)

     2006            —           —           —           —           30         176         206   
        

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
           20,139         —           938         521         2,997         4,429         8,885   

Pooled trust preferred securities:

                          

TROPC (2)

     2003            —           —           —           888         444         3,517         4,849   

MM Community Funding IX

     2003         CC         2,067         —           —           —           165         2,612         2,777   

Reg Div Funding

     2004         D         4,012         —           165         —           321         5,199         5,685   

Pretsl XII

     2003         C         2,732         —           —           —           —           1,897         1,897   

Pretsl XV (2)

     2004            —           —           —           —           —           3,374         3,374   

Reg Div Funding (3)

     2005            —           —           311         —           —           3,767         4,078   
        

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
           8,811         —           476         888         930         20,366         22,660   

Total other-than-temporary- impairment recognized in earnings

            $ —         $ 1,414       $ 1,409       $ 3,927       $ 24,795       $ 31,545   
           

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Lowest rating for the security provided by any nationally recognized credit rating agency.
(2) Securities sold.
(3) Security written down to zero.

NOTE 7—LOANS HELD FOR SALE

Residential loans that Old National has committed to sell are recorded at fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 825-10 (SFAS No. 159 – The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities). At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Old National had residential loans held for sale of $14.6 million and $12.6 million, respectively.

During the first three months of 2013, commercial and commercial real estate loans held for investment of $2.5 million, including $0.4 million of purchased impaired loans, were reclassified to loans held for sale at the lower of cost or fair value and sold for $3.2 million, resulting in a charge-off of $0.3 million and other income of $1.0 million. At March 31, 2013, there were no loans held for sale under this arrangement.

During the first three months of 2012, commercial and commercial real estate loans held for investment of $0.6 million, including $0.5 million of purchased impaired loans, were reclassified to loans held for sale at the lower of cost or fair value and sold for $0.8 million, resulting in a charge-off of $0.1 million and a recovery of $0.3 million. At March 31, 2012, there were no loans held for sale under this arrangement.

 

20


Table of Contents

NOTE 8 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

Old National’s finance receivables consist primarily of loans made to consumers and commercial clients in various industries including manufacturing, agribusiness, transportation, mining, wholesaling and retailing. Most of Old National’s lending activity occurs within the Company’s principal geographic markets of Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky. Old National has no concentration of commercial loans in any single industry exceeding 10% of its portfolio.

The composition of loans by lending classification was as follows:

 

     March 31,     December 31,  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012  

Commercial (1)

   $ 1,315,136      $ 1,336,820   

Commercial real estate:

    

Construction

     87,434        99,081   

Other

     1,142,876        1,156,802   

Residential real estate

     1,352,679        1,324,703   

Consumer credit:

    

Heloc

     248,239        258,114   

Auto

     531,077        526,085   

Other

     108,204        122,656   

Covered loans

     326,397        372,333   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans

     5,112,042        5,196,594   

Allowance for loan losses

     (47,313     (49,047

Allowance for loan losses—covered loans

     (6,168     (5,716
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loans

   $ 5,058,561      $ 5,141,831   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes direct finance leases of $52.4 million at March 31, 2013 and $57.7 million at December 31, 2012.

Portfolio loans, or loans Old National intends to hold for investment purposes, are carried at the principal balance outstanding, net of earned interest, purchase premiums or discounts, deferred loan fees and costs, and an allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the principal balances of loans outstanding.

The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:

Commercial

Commercial loans are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.

Commercial real estate

These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts, and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing Old National’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type and geographic location. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. As a general rule, Old National avoids financing single purpose projects unless other underwriting factors are present to help mitigate risk. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans.

 

21


Table of Contents

Included with commercial real estate are construction loans, which are underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally based on estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from Old National until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

Residential

With respect to residential loans that are secured by 1-4 family residences and are generally owner occupied, Old National typically establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and requires private mortgage insurance if that ratio is exceeded. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in residential property values. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.

Consumer

Home equity loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in 1-4 family residences, and consumer loans are secured by consumer assets such as automobiles or recreational vehicles. Some consumer loans are unsecured such as small installment loans and certain lines of credit. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in residential property values. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.

Covered Loans

On July 29, 2011, Old National acquired the banking operations of Integra Bank N.A. (“Integra”) in an FDIC assisted transaction. As part of the purchase and assumption agreement, the Company and the FDIC entered into loss sharing agreements (each, a “loss sharing agreement” and collectively, the “loss sharing agreements”), whereby the FDIC will cover a substantial portion of any future losses on loans (and related unfunded commitments), other real estate owned (“OREO”) and up to 90 days of certain accrued interest on loans. The acquired loans and OREO subject to the loss sharing agreements are referred to collectively as “covered assets.” Under the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will reimburse Old National for 80% of losses up to $275.0 million, losses in excess of $275.0 million up to $467.2 million at 0% reimbursement, and 80% of losses in excess of $467.2 million. As of March 31, 2013, we do not expect losses to exceed $275.0 million. Old National will reimburse the FDIC for its share of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC has reimbursed the Bank under the loss sharing agreements. The loss sharing provisions of the agreements for commercial and single family residential mortgage loans are in effect for five and ten years, respectively, from the July 29, 2011 acquisition date and the loss recovery provisions for such loans are in effect for eight years and ten years, respectively, from the acquisition date.

Allowance for loan losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable losses incurred in the loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is an estimate based on reviews of individual loans, pools of homogeneous loans, historical loss experience, and assessments of the impact of current economic conditions on the portfolio.

 

22


Table of Contents

The allowance is increased through a provision charged to operating expense. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged to the allowance. Recoveries of loans previously charged-off are added to the allowance.

No allowance was brought forward on any of the acquired loans as any credit deterioration evident in the loans was included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. Purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans are not considered impaired until after the point at which there has been a degradation of cash flows below our expected cash flows at acquisition. Impairment on PCI loans would be recognized in the current period as provision expense.

Old National’s activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

 

           Commercial                           

(dollars in thousands)

   Commercial     Real Estate     Consumer     Residential     Unallocated      Total  

2013

             

Allowance for loan losses:

             

Beginning balance

   $ 14,642      $ 31,289      $ 5,155      $ 3,677        —         $ 54,763   

Charge-offs

     (1,110     (1,736     (1,902     (257     —           (5,005

Recoveries

     715        889        1,234        40        —           2,878   

Provision

     2,720        (1,996     198        (77     —           845   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 16,967      $ 28,446      $ 4,685      $ 3,383        —         $ 53,481   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

           Commercial                           

(dollars in thousands)

   Commercial     Real Estate     Consumer     Residential     Unallocated      Total  

2012

             

Allowance for loan losses:

             

Beginning balance

   $ 19,964      $ 26,993      $ 6,954      $ 4,149        —         $ 58,060   

Charge-offs

     (1,268     (3,375     (2,425     (560     —           (7,628

Recoveries

     1,444        568        1,337        79        —           3,428   

Provision

     (2,046     3,632        (220     690        —           2,056   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 18,094      $ 27,818      $ 5,646      $ 4,358        —         $ 55,916   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

23


Table of Contents

The following tables provide Old National’s recorded investment in financing receivables by portfolio segment at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and other information regarding the allowance:

 

            Commercial                              

(dollars in thousands)

   Commercial      Real Estate      Consumer      Residential      Unallocated      Total  

March 31, 2013

                 

Allowance for loan losses:

                 

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 4,325       $ 2,483         —           —           —         $ 6,808   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

   $ 10,061       $ 14,604       $ 2,643       $ 3,069         —         $ 30,377   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

   $ 1,311       $ 7,543         1,098       $ 176         —         $ 10,128   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

   $ 1,270       $ 3,816       $ 944       $ 138         —         $ 6,168   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total allowance for credit losses

   $ 16,967       $ 28,446       $ 4,685       $ 3,383         —         $ 53,481   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans and leases outstanding:

                 

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 27,100       $ 55,094         —           —           —         $ 82,194   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

   $ 1,282,286       $ 1,135,456       $ 887,520       $ 1,352,679         —         $ 4,657,941   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

   $ 5,750       $ 39,760         —           —           —         $ 45,510   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

   $ 46,080       $ 153,922       $ 92,259       $ 34,136         —         $ 326,397   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans and leases outstanding

   $ 1,361,216       $ 1,384,232       $ 979,779       $ 1,386,815         —         $ 5,112,042   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

            Commercial                              

(dollars in thousands)

   Commercial      Real Estate      Consumer      Residential      Unallocated      Total  

December 31, 2012

                 

Allowance for loan losses:

                 

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 4,702       $ 2,790         —           —           —         $ 7,492   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

   $ 9,900       $ 14,643       $ 3,384       $ 3,637         —         $ 31,564   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

   $ 40       $ 8,958       $ 953       $ 40         —         $ 9,991   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

     —         $ 4,898       $ 818         —           —         $ 5,716   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total allowance for credit losses

   $ 14,642       $ 31,289       $ 5,155       $ 3,677         —         $ 54,763   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans and leases outstanding:

                 

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 29,980       $ 47,257         —           —           —         $ 77,237   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

   $ 1,298,433       $ 1,163,595       $ 906,855       $ 1,324,703         —         $ 4,693,586   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

   $ 8,407       $ 45,031         —           —           —         $ 53,438   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance: covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

   $ 55,639       $ 182,826       $ 97,972       $ 35,896         —         $ 372,333   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans and leases outstanding

   $ 1,392,459       $ 1,438,709       $ 1,004,827       $ 1,360,599         —         $ 5,196,594   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

24


Table of Contents

Credit Quality

Old National’s management monitors the credit quality of its financing receivables in an on-going manner. Internally, management assigns a credit quality grade to each non-homogeneous commercial and commercial real estate loan in the portfolio. The primary determinants of the credit quality grade are based upon the reliability of the primary source of repayment and the past, present, and projected financial condition of the borrower. The credit quality rating also reflects current economic and industry conditions. Major factors used in determining the grade can vary based on the nature of the loan, but commonly include factors such as debt service coverage, internal cash flow, liquidity, leverage, operating performance, debt burden, FICO scores, occupancy, interest rate sensitivity, and expense burden. Old National uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Criticized. Special mention loans that have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Classified – Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Classified – Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Pass rated loans are those loans that are other than criticized, classified – substandard or classified – doubtful.

As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the risk category of loans, excluding covered loans, by class of loans is as follows:

 

(dollars in thousands)                                          

Corporate Credit

Exposure

   Commercial      Commercial Real Estate-
Construction
     Commercial Real Estate-
Other
 

by Internally

Assigned Grade

   March 31,
2013
     December 31,
2012
     March 31,
2013
     December 31,
2012
     March 31,
2013
     December 31,
2012
 

Grade:

                 

Pass

   $ 1,195,000       $ 1,237,274       $ 56,763       $ 62,604       $ 962,717       $ 965,967   

Criticized

     62,769         38,476         11,831         11,969         52,652         62,819   

Classified—substandard

     23,013         23,388         9,086         10,204         41,467         38,252   

Classified—doubtful

     34,354         37,682         9,754         14,304         86,040         89,764   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,315,136       $ 1,336,820       $ 87,434       $ 99,081       $ 1,142,876       $ 1,156,802   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Old National considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. For residential and consumer loan classes, Old National also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan and by payment activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in residential and consumer loans based on payment activity as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, excluding covered loans:

 

March 31, 2013

   Consumer      Residential  

(dollars in

thousands)

   Heloc      Auto      Other         

Performing

   $ 246,401       $ 529,417       $ 106,313       $ 1,342,915   

Nonperforming

     1,838         1,660         1,891         9,764   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 248,239       $ 531,077       $ 108,204       $ 1,352,679   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

25


Table of Contents

December 31, 2012

   Consumer      Residential  

(dollars in

thousands)

   Heloc      Auto      Other         

Performing

   $ 256,394       $ 524,105       $ 120,547       $ 1,312,717   

Nonperforming

     1,720         1,980         2,109         11,986   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 258,114       $ 526,085       $ 122,656       $ 1,324,703   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired Loans

Large commercial credits are subject to individual evaluation for impairment. Retail credits and other small balance credits that are part of a homogeneous group are not tested for individual impairment unless they are modified as a troubled debt restructuring. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that contractual interest and principal payments will not be collected either for the amounts or by the dates as scheduled in the loan agreement. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Old National’s policy, for all but purchased credit impaired loans, is to recognize interest income on impaired loans unless the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the average balance of impaired loans was $79.7 million and $89.2 million, respectively, for which no interest income was recorded. No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with these impaired loans.

The following table shows Old National’s impaired loans, excluding covered loans, that are individually evaluated as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Of the loans purchased during 2012 and 2011 without FDIC loss share coverage, only those that have experienced subsequent impairment since the date acquired are included in the table below. Purchased loans of $11.3 million migrated to classified-doubtful during the first quarter of 2013. Purchased loans of $8.3 million migrated to classified-doubtful during the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

            Unpaid         
     Recorded      Principal      Related  

(dollars in thousands)

   Investment      Balance      Allowance  

March 31, 2013

        

With no related allowance recorded:

        

Commercial

   $ 7,941       $ 10,384       $ —     

Commercial Real Estate—Construction

     1,104         1,212         —     

Commercial Real Estate—Other

     16,250         22,145         —     

With an allowance recorded:

        

Commercial

     19,159         24,358         4,325   

Commercial Real Estate—Construction

     2,523         2,523         69   

Commercial Real Estate—Other

     35,217         36,909         2,414   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

   $ 82,194       $ 97,531       $ 6,808   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

        

With no related allowance recorded:

        

Commercial

   $ 6,563       $ 9,280       $ —     

Commercial Real Estate—Construction

     1,179         1,287         —     

Commercial Real Estate—Other

     16,944         23,162         —     

With an allowance recorded:

        

Commercial

     23,417         28,574         4,702   

Commercial Real Estate—Construction

     3,227         3,227         69   

Commercial Real Estate—Other

     25,907         28,732         2,721   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

   $ 77,237       $ 94,262       $ 7,492   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

26


Table of Contents

The average balance of impaired loans, excluding covered loans, and interest income recognized on impaired loans during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 are included in the tables below.

 

(dollars in thousands)

   Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized (1)
 

March 31, 2013

     

With no related allowance recorded:

     

Commercial

   $ 7,252       $  —     

Commercial Real Estate—Construction

     1,142         —     

Commercial Real Estate—Other

     16,598         4   

With an allowance recorded:

     

Commercial

     21,289         10   

Commercial Real Estate—Construction

     2,875         —     

Commercial Real Estate—Other

     30,562         109   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

   $ 79,718       $ 123   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) The Company does not record interest on nonaccrual loans until principal is recovered.

 

(dollars in thousands)

   Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized (1)
 

March 31, 2012

     

With no related allowance recorded:

     

Commercial

   $ 8,696       $ 114   

Commercial Real Estate—Construction

     1,551         2   

Commercial Real Estate—Other

     28,130         186   

With an allowance recorded:

     

Commercial

     22,502         274   

Commercial Real Estate—Construction

     1,190         22   

Commercial Real Estate—Other

     27,160         283   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

   $ 89,229       $ 881   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) The Company does not record interest on nonaccrual loans until principal is recovered.

For all loan classes, a loan is generally placed on nonaccrual status when principal or interest becomes 90 days past due unless it is well secured and in the process of collection, or earlier when concern exists as to the ultimate collectibility of principal or interest. Interest accrued during the current year on such loans is reversed against earnings. Interest accrued in the prior year, if any, is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Cash interest received on these loans is applied to the principal balance until the principal is recovered or until the loan returns to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current, remain current for six months and future payments are reasonably assured.

Covered loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 accrue interest, even though they may be contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the periodic re-estimation of expected cash flows and is included in the resulting recognition of current period covered loan loss provision or prospective yield adjustments. Similar to uncovered loans, covered loans accounted for outside FASB ASC Topic 310-30 are classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful. Information for covered loans accounted for both under and outside FASB ASC Topic 310-30 is included in the table below in the row labeled covered loans.

 

27


Table of Contents

Old National’s past due financing receivables as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:

 

                   Recorded
Investment
                      

(dollars in thousands)

   30-59 Days
Past Due
     60-89 Days
Past Due
     > 90 Days and
Accruing
     Nonaccrual      Total
Past Due
     Current  

March 31, 2013

                 

Commercial

   $ 1,236       $ 289       $ 384       $ 34,354       $ 36,263       $ 1,278,873   

Commercial Real Estate:

                 

Construction

     84         —           —           9,754         9,838         77,596   

Other

     1,808         1,095         256         86,040         89,199         1,053,677   

Consumer:

                 

Heloc

     1,311         132         75         1,838         3,356         244,883   

Auto

     3,346         427         61         1,660         5,494         525,583   

Other

     1,162         271         107         1,891         3,431         104,773   

Residential

     10,023         557         1,075         9,764         21,419         1,331,260   

Covered loans

     2,255         441         30         65,171         67,897         258,500   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans

   $ 21,225       $ 3,212       $ 1,988       $ 210,472       $ 236,897       $ 4,875,145   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

                 

Commercial

   $ 2,691       $ 515       $ 322       $ 36,766       $ 40,294       $ 1,296,526   

Commercial Real Estate:

                 

Construction

     11         —           —           14,304         14,315         84,766   

Other

     3,439         665         236         81,525         85,865         1,070,937   

Consumer:

                 

Heloc

     961         15         —           1,720         2,696         255,418   

Auto

     4,070         881         328         1,980         7,259         518,826   

Other

     1,732         403         110         2,109         4,354         118,302   

Residential

     14,686         1,874         66         11,986         28,612         1,296,091   

Covered loans

     2,891         941         15         103,946         107,793         264,540   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans

   $ 30,481       $ 5,294       $ 1,077       $ 254,336       $ 291,188       $ 4,905,406   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loan Participations

Old National has loan participations, which qualify as participating interests, with other financial institutions. At March 31, 2013, these loans totaled $224.5 million, of which $146.7 million had been sold to other financial institutions and $77.8 million was retained by Old National. The loan participations convey proportionate ownership rights with equal priority to each participating interest holder, involve no recourse (other than ordinary representations and warranties) to, or subordination by, any participating interest holder, all cash flows are divided among the participating interest holders in proportion to each holder’s share of ownership and no holder has the right to pledge the entire financial asset unless all participating interest holders agree.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

Old National may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain loans. The decision to restructure a loan, versus aggressively enforcing the collection of the loan, may benefit Old National by increasing the ultimate probability of collection.

Any loans that are modified are reviewed by Old National to identify if a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) has occurred, which is when for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Bank grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Terms may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay in line with its current financial status. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the terms of certain loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings. The modification of the terms of such loans included one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan, an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate of new debt with similar risk, or a permanent reduction of the recorded investment of the loan.

 

28


Table of Contents

Loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are typically placed on nonaccrual status until the Company determines the future collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured, which generally requires that the borrower demonstrate a period of performance according to the restructured terms for six months.

If the Company is unable to resolve a nonperforming loan issue, the credit will be charged off when it is apparent there will be a loss. For large commercial type loans, each relationship is individually analyzed for evidence of apparent loss based on quantitative benchmarks or subjectively based upon certain events or particular circumstances. It is Old National’s policy to charge off small commercial loans scored through our small business credit center with contractual balances under $250,000 that have been placed on nonaccrual status or became ninety days or more delinquent, without regard to the collateral position. For residential and consumer loans, a charge off is recorded at the time foreclosure is initiated or when the loan becomes 120 to 180 days past due, whichever is earlier.

For commercial troubled debt restructurings, an allocated reserve is established within the allowance for loan losses for the difference between the carrying value of the loan and its computed fair value. To determine the fair value of the loan, one of the following methods is selected: (1) the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loans original effective interest rate, (2) the loan’s observable market price, or (3) the fair value of the collateral value, if the loan is collateral dependent. The allocated reserve is established as the difference between the carrying value of the loan and the collectable value. If there are significant changes in the amount or timing of the loan’s expected future cash flows, impairment is recalculated and the valuation allowance is adjusted accordingly.

For consumer and residential troubled debt restructurings, an additional amount is added to the loan loss reserve that represents the difference in the present value of the cash flows between the original terms and the new terms of the modified loan, using the original effective interest rate of the loan as a discount rate.

At March 31, 2013, our troubled debt restructurings consisted of $12.0 million of commercial loans, $17.6 million of commercial real estate loans, $0.9 million of consumer loans and $0.5 million of residential loans, totaling $31.0 million. Approximately $20.8 million of the troubled debt restructuring at March 31, 2013 were included with nonaccrual loans. At December 31, 2012, our troubled debt restructurings consisted of $12.7 million of commercial loans, $18.4 million of commercial real estate loans, $0.5 million of consumer loans and $0.5 million of residential loans, totaling $32.1 million. Approximately $22.1 million of the troubled debt restructuring at December 31, 2012 were included with nonaccrual loans.

As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Old National has allocated $3.2 million and $4.5 million of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings, respectively. Old National has not committed to lend any additional amounts as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings.

The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2013:

 

            Pre-modification      Post-modification  
     Number of      Outstanding Recorded      Outstanding Recorded  

(dollars in thousands)

   Loans      Investment      Investment  

Troubled Debt Restructuring:

        

Commercial

     5       $ 695       $ 668   

Commercial Real Estate—construction

     —           —           —     

Commercial Real Estate—other

     9         1,076         949   

Consumer—other

     24         533         477   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     38       $ 2,304       $ 2,094   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

29


Table of Contents

The troubled debt restructurings described above increased the allowance for loan losses by $0.4 million and resulted in no charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012:

 

            Pre-modification      Post-modification  
     Number of      Outstanding Recorded      Outstanding Recorded  

(dollars in thousands)

   Loans      Investment      Investment  

Troubled Debt Restructuring:

        

Commercial

     44       $ 9,585       $ 9,574   

Commercial Real Estate—construction

     3         1,392         1,382   

Commercial Real Estate—other

     35         16,404         16,272   

Consumer—other

     26         996         994   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     108       $ 28,377       $ 28,222   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The troubled debt restructurings described above increased the allowance for loan losses by $0.4 million and resulted in charge-offs of $1.0 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012.

The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructuring for which there was a payment default within last twelve months following the modification during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The impact of the defaults was immaterial.

 

(dollars in thousands)

   Number of
Contracts
     Recorded
Investment
 

Troubled Debt Restructuring

     

That Subsequently Defaulted:

     

Commercial

     4       $ 133   

Commercial Real Estate

     5         539   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     9       $ 672   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012:

 

(dollars in thousands)

   Number of
Contracts
     Recorded
Investment
 

Troubled Debt Restructuring

     

That Subsequently Defaulted:

     

Commercial

     8       $ 500   

Commercial Real Estate

     7         611   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     15       $ 1,111   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 90 days contractually past due under the modified terms.

The terms of certain other loans were modified during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 that did not meet the definition of a troubled debt restructuring. It is our process to review all classified and criticized loans that, during the period, have been renewed, have entered into a forbearance agreement, have gone from principal and interest to interest only, or have had the maturity date extended. In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. The evaluation is performed under the Company’s internal underwriting policy. We also evaluate whether a concession has been granted or if we were adequately compensated through a market interest rate, additional collateral or a bona fide guarantee. We also consider whether the modification was insignificant relative to the other terms of the agreement or if the delay in a payment was 90 days or less.

 

30


Table of Contents

Purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans are not considered impaired until after the point at which there has been a degradation of cash flows below our expected cash flows at acquisition. If a PCI loan is subsequently modified, and meets the definition of a TDR, it will be removed from PCI accounting and accounted for as a TDR only if the PCI loan was being accounted for individually. If the purchased credit impaired loan is being accounted for as part of a pool, it will not be removed from the pool.

In general, once a modified loan is considered a TDR, the loan will always be considered a TDR, and therefore impaired, until it is paid in full, otherwise settled, sold or charged off. However, our policy also permits for loans to be removed from troubled debt restructuring status in the years following the restructuring if the following two conditions are met: (1) The restructuring agreement specifies an interest rate equal to or greater than the rate that the Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk, and (2) the loan is not impaired based on the terms specified by the restructuring agreement.

The following table presents activity in troubled debt restructurings for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

           Commercial                    

(dollars in thousands)

   Commercial     Real Estate     Consumer     Residential     Total  

2013

          

Troubled debt restructuring:

          

Balance, January 1, 2013

   $ 12,660      $ 18,422      $ 473      $ 499      $ 32,054   

Charge-offs

     (27     (2     (87     —          (116

Payments

     (1,286     (1,722     (12     (34     (3,054

Additions

     668        949        472        5        2,094   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance March 31, 2013

   $ 12,015      $ 17,647      $ 846      $ 470      $ 30,978   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

   Commercial     Commercial
Real Estate
    Consumer     Residential     Total  

2012

          

Troubled debt restructuring:

          

Balance, January 1, 2012

   $ 7,086      $ 5,851      $ 53      $  —        $ 12,990   

Charge-offs

     (565     55        —          —          (510

Payments

     (618     (1,655     —          —          (2,273

Additions

     1,862        3,299        104        76        5,341   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance March 31, 2012

   $ 7,765      $ 7,550      $ 157      $ 76      $ 15,548   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Purchased Impaired Loans (non-covered loans)

Purchased loans acquired in a business combination are recorded at estimated fair value on their purchase date with no carryover of the related allowance for loan and lease losses. In determining the estimated fair value of purchased loans, management considers a number of factors including the remaining life of the acquired loans, estimated prepayments, estimated loss ratios, estimated value of the underlying collateral, net present value of cash flows expected to be received, among others. Purchased loans are accounted for in accordance with guidance for certain loans acquired in a transfer (ASC 310-30), when the loans have evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that the acquirer will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. The difference between contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the non-accretable difference. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan and lease losses. Subsequent increases in expected cash flows will result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges and then an adjustment to accretable yield, which would have a positive impact on interest income.

 

31


Table of Contents

Old National has purchased loans for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. Of these acquired credit impaired loans, $4.0 million in carrying balances did not meet the criteria to be accounted for under the guidance of ASC 310-30 as they were revolving lines of credit, thus these lines have not been included in the following table. For these noncovered loans that meet the criteria of ASC 310-30 treatment, the carrying amount is as follows:

 

     March 31,      December 31,  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013      2012  

Commercial

   $ 5,765       $ 7,859   

Commercial real estate

     44,014         52,981   

Consumer

     19,230         22,432   

Residential

     121         123   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Carrying amount

   $ 69,130       $ 83,395   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Carrying amount, net of allowance

   $ 65,168       $ 79,120   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

   $ 3,962       $ 4,275   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The outstanding balance of noncovered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, including contractual principal, interest, fees and penalties, was $162.4 million and $179.5 million as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The accretable difference on purchased loans acquired in a business combination is the difference between the expected cash flows and the net present value of expected cash flows with such difference accreted into earnings using the effective yield method over the term of the loans. Accretion of $4.0 million has been recorded as loan interest income through the three months ended March 31, 2013. Accretion of $2.2 million was recorded as loan interest income through the three months ended March 31, 2012. Improvement in cash flow expectations has resulted in a reclassification from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield.

Accretable yield of noncovered loans, or income expected to be collected, is as follows:

 

           Integra              

(dollars in thousands)

   Monroe     Noncovered     IBT     Total  

Balance at January 1, 2013

   $ 11,834      $ 3,575      $ 16,170      $ 31,579   

New loans purchased

     —          —          —          —     

Accretion of income

     (2,005     (389     (1,596     (3,990

Reclassifications from (to) nonaccretable difference

     (254     37        1,444        1,227   

Disposals/other adjustments

     (304     (1     —          (305
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2013

   $ 9,271      $ 3,222      $ 16,018      $ 28,511   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Included in Old National’s allowance for loan losses is $4.0 million related to the purchased loans disclosed above for the first three months of 2013. Included in Old National’s allowance for loan losses was $4.3 million related to the purchased loans in 2012. An immaterial amount of allowances for loan losses were reversed during 2013 and 2012 related to these loans.

 

32


Table of Contents

Purchased loans, as of the date of acquisition, for which it was probable that all contractually required payments would not be collected are as follows:

 

     Monroe     Integra        

(dollars in thousands)

   Bancorp     Bank (1)     IBT  

Contractually required payments

   $ 94,714      $ 921,856      $ 118,535   

Nonaccretable difference

     (45,157     (226,426     (53,165
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition

     49,557        695,430        65,370   

Accretable yield

     (6,971     (98,487     (11,945
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair value of acquired loans at acquisition

   $ 42,586      $ 596,943      $ 53,425   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes covered and noncovered.

Income is not recognized on certain purchased loans if Old National cannot reasonably estimate cash flows to be collected. Old National had no purchased loans for which it could not reasonably estimate cash flows to be collected.

NOTE 9 – COVERED LOANS

Covered loans represent loans acquired from the FDIC that are subject to loss share agreements. The carrying amount of covered loans was $326.4 million at March 31, 2013. The composition of covered loans by lending classification was as follows:

 

     At March 31, 2013  
     Loans Accounted for     Loans excluded from         
     Under ASC 310-30     ASC 310-30 (1)         
     (Purchased Credit     (Not Purchased      Total Covered  

(dollars in thousands)

   Impaired)     Credit Impaired)      Purchased Loans  

Commercial

   $ 19,089      $ 26,991       $ 46,080   

Commercial real estate

     134,090        19,832         153,922   

Residential

     33,986        150         34,136   

Consumer

     23,373        68,886         92,259   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Covered loans

     210,538        115,859         326,397   

Allowance for loan losses

     (6,168     —           (6,168
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Covered loans, net

   $ 204,370      $ 115,859       $ 320,229   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes loans with revolving privileges which are scoped out of FASB ASC 310-30 and certain loans which Old National elected to treat under the cost recovery method of accounting.

Loans were recorded at fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations. No allowance for loan losses related to the acquired loans is recorded on the acquisition date as the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk. Loans acquired are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in FASB ASC 820, exclusive of the loss share agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The fair value estimates associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows.

The outstanding balance of covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, including contractual principal, interest, fees and penalties, was $487.3 million and $534.3 million as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Over the life of the acquired loans, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected on individual loans or on pools of loans sharing common risk characteristics which were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The Company evaluates at each balance sheet date whether the present value of its loans determined using the effective interest rates has decreased and if so, recognizes a provision for loan losses. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan’s or pool’s remaining life. Eighty percent of the prospective yield adjustments are offset as Old National will recognize a corresponding decrease in cash flows expected from the indemnification asset prospectively in a similar manner. The indemnification asset is adjusted over the shorter of the life of the underlying investment or the indemnification agreement.

 

33


Table of Contents

Accretable yield, or income expected to be collected on the covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, is as follows:

 

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012  

Balance at January 1,

   $ 85,779      $ 92,053   

New loans purchased

     —          —     

Accretion of income

     (10,343     (12,704

Reclassifications from (to) nonaccretable difference

     7,554        13,024   

Disposals/other adjustments

     437        13,078   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31,

   $ 83,427      $ 105,451   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

At March 31, 2013, the loss sharing asset is comprised of a $97.2 million FDIC indemnification asset and a $12.7 million FDIC loss share receivable. The loss share receivable represents actual incurred losses where reimbursement has not yet been received from the FDIC. The indemnification asset represents future cash flows the Company expects to collect from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements and the amount related to the estimated improvements in cash flow expectations that are being amortized over the same period for which those improved cash flows are being accreted into income. At March 31, 2013, $84.3 million of the FDIC indemnification asset is related to expected indemnification payments and $12.9 million is expected to be amortized and reported in noninterest income as an offset to future accreted interest income.

For covered loans, the Company remeasures contractual and expected cash flows on a quarterly basis. When the quarterly re-measurement process results in a decrease in expected cash flows due to an increase in expected credit losses, impairment is recorded. As a result of this impairment, the indemnification asset is increased to reflect anticipated future cash flows to be received from the FDIC. Consistent with the loss sharing agreements between the Company and the FDIC, the amount of the increase to the indemnification asset is measured at 80% of the resulting impairment.

Alternatively, when the quarterly re-measurement results in an increase in expected future cash flows due to a decrease in expected credit losses, the nonaccretable difference decreases and the effective yield of the related loan portfolio is increased. As a result of the improved expected cash flows, the indemnification asset would be reduced first by the amount of any impairment previously recorded and, second, by increased amortization over the remaining life of the related loss sharing agreements.

The following table shows a detailed analysis of the FDIC loss sharing asset for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012  

Balance at January 1,

   $ 116,624      $ 168,881   

Adjustments not reflected in income:

    

Established through acquisitions

     —          —     

Cash received from FDIC

     (3,923     (20,372

Loan expenses to be reimbursed

     380        1,029   

Other

     (918     (1

Adjustments reflected in income:

    

(Amortization) accretion

     (1,612     (2,938

Impairment

     120        —     

Write-downs/sale of other real estate

     372        7,160   

Recovery amounts due to FDIC

     (1,243     —     

Other

     61        542   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31,

   $ 109,861      $ 154,301   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

34


Table of Contents

NOTE 10 – OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED

The following table shows the carrying amount for other real estate owned at March 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

     Other Real Estate     Other Real Estate  

(dollars in thousands)

   Owned (1)     Owned, Covered  

Balance, January 1, 2013

   $ 11,179      $ 26,137   

Additions

     1,141        2,035   

Sales

     (2,613     (1,356

Gains (losses)/Write-downs

     (604     (702
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2013

   $ 9,103      $ 26,114   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes $0.4 million of repossessed personal property at March 31, 2013.

 

     Other Real Estate     Other Real Estate  

(dollars in thousands)

   Owned (1)     Owned, Covered  

Balance, January 1, 2012

   $ 7,119      $ 30,443   

Additions

     746        6,682   

Sales

     (799     (2,817

Gains (losses)/Write-downs

     (592     (9,603
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2012

   $ 6,474      $ 24,705   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes $0.4 million of repossessed personal property at March 31, 2012.

Covered OREO expenses and valuation write-downs are recorded in the noninterest expense section of the consolidated statements of income. Under the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will reimburse the Company for 80% of expenses and valuation write-downs related to covered assets up to $275.0 million, losses in excess of $275.0 million up to $467.2 million at 0%, and 80% of losses in excess of $467.2 million. As of March 31, 2013, we do not expect losses to exceed $275.0 million. The reimbursable portion of these expenses is recorded in the FDIC indemnification asset. Changes in the FDIC indemnification asset are recorded in the noninterest income section of the consolidated statements of income.

NOTE 11—GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table shows the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

     Community                

(dollars in thousands)

   Banking      Other      Total  

Balance, January 1, 2013

   $ 297,055       $ 41,765       $ 338,820   

Goodwill acquired during the period

     —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2013

   $ 297,055       $ 41,765       $ 338,820   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance, January 1, 2012

   $ 212,412       $ 40,765       $ 253,177   

Goodwill acquired during the period

     —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2012

   $ 212,412       $ 40,765       $ 253,177   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Goodwill is reviewed annually for impairment. Old National completed its most recent annual goodwill impairment test as of August 31, 2012 and concluded that, based on current events and circumstances, it is not more likely than not that the carry value of goodwill exceeds fair value. During the second half of 2012, Old National recorded $85.6 million of goodwill associated with the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp, of which $84.6 million was allocated to the “Community Banking” segment and $1.0 million to the “Other” segment.

 

35


Table of Contents

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was as follows:

 

            Accumulated        
     Gross Carrying      Amortization     Net Carrying  

(dollars in thousands)

   Amount      and Impairment     Amount  

March 31, 2013

       

Amortized intangible assets:

       

Core deposit

   $ 40,559       $ (27,696   $ 12,863   

Customer business relationships

     26,411         (18,603     7,808   

Customer trust relationships

     5,352         (1,267     4,085   

Customer loan relationships

     4,413         (2,474     1,939   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

   $ 76,735       $ (50,040   $ 26,695   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

       

Amortized intangible assets:

       

Core deposit

   $ 40,559       $ (25,908   $ 14,651   

Customer business relationships

     26,411         (18,153     8,258   

Customer trust relationships

     5,352         (1,080     4,272   

Customer loan relationships

     4,413         (2,374     2,039   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

   $ 76,735       $ (47,515   $ 29,220   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles and customer relationship intangibles and are being amortized primarily on an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives, generally over a period of 5 to 15 years. During the third quarter of 2012, Old National increased core deposit intangibles by $1.3 million related to the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp, which is included in the “Community Banking” segment. Also during the third quarter of 2012, Old National increased customer relationship intangibles by $1.7 million associated with the trust business of Indiana Community Bancorp, which is included in the “Other” segment. During the second quarter of 2012, Old National increased customer business relationships by $0.5 million relating to the purchase of an insurance book of business, which is included in the “Other” segment.

Old National reviews other intangible assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. No impairment charges were recorded in 2013 or 2012. Total amortization expense associated with other intangible assets for the three months ended March 31 was $2.5 million in 2013 and $2.0 million in 2012. Included in expense for the first quarter of 2013 is $0.6 million related to the branch sales.

Estimated amortization expense for future years is as follows:

 

(dollars in thousands)

      

2013 remaining

   $ 5,189   

2014

     5,800   

2015

     4,688   

2016

     3,767   

2017

     2,523   

Thereafter

     4,728   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 26,695   
  

 

 

 

 

36


Table of Contents

NOTE 12 – SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

The following table presents the distribution of Old National’s short-term borrowings and related weighted-average interest rates as of March 31, 2013:

 

     Federal Funds     Repurchase        

(dollars in thousands)

   Purchased     Agreements     Total  

2013

      

Outstanding at March 31, 2013

   $ 306,986      $ 337,035      $ 644,021   

Average amount outstanding

     332,568        351,977        684,545   

Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end

     466,861        343,288     

Weighted average interest rate:

      

During three months ended March 31, 2013

     0.22     0.10     0.16

At March 31, 2013

     0.20        0.30        0.25   

NOTE 13—FINANCING ACTIVITIES

The following table summarizes Old National’s and its subsidiaries’ other borrowings at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

 

     March 31,     December 31,  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012  

Old National Bancorp:

    

Junior subordinated debenture (variable rates of 1.88% to 2.03%) maturing March 2035 to June 2037

   $ 28,000      $ 28,000   

ASC 815 fair value hedge and other basis adjustments

     (3,320     (3,339

Old National Bank:

    

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (variable rates 3.62% to 3.82%) maturing October 2014

     50,000        50,000   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances (fixed rates 0.17% to 8.34% and variable rate 2.58%) maturing April 2013 to January 2023

     455,224        155,323   

Capital lease obligation

     4,198        4,211   

ASC 815 fair value hedge and other basis adjustments

     2,696        3,298   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other borrowings

   $ 536,798      $ 237,493   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Contractual maturities of other borrowings at March 31, 2013, were as follows:

 

(dollars in thousands)

      

Due in 2013

   $ 350,349   

Due in 2014

     50,794   

Due in 2015

     63   

Due in 2016

     17,413   

Due in 2017

     21,144   

Thereafter

     97,659   

ASC 815 fair value hedge and other basis adjustments

     (624
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 536,798   
  

 

 

 

 

37


Table of Contents

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK

Federal Home Loan Bank advances had weighted-average rates of 1.06% and 3.07% at March 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively. These borrowings are collateralized by investment securities and residential real estate loans up to 145% of outstanding debt.

In the first quarter of 2013, Old National terminated a $25.0 million Federal Home Loan Bank advance, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million. Old National also restructured $33.4 million pertaining to two FHLB advances in the first quarter of 2013, which lowered their effective interest rates from 3.27% and 3.29% to 2.04% and 2.49%, respectively.

JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

Junior subordinated debentures related to trust preferred securities are classified in “other borrowings”. These securities qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes, subject to certain limitations.

In 2007, Old National acquired St. Joseph Capital Trust II in conjunction with its acquisition of St. Joseph Capital Corporation. Old National guarantees the payment of distributions on the trust preferred securities issued by St. Joseph Capital Trust II. St. Joseph Capital Trust II issued $5.0 million in preferred securities in March 2005. The preferred securities had a cumulative annual distribution rate of 6.27% until March 2010 and now carry a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 175 basis points, payable quarterly and maturing on March 17, 2035. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by St. Joseph Capital Trust II. Old National, at any time, may redeem the junior subordinated debentures at par and thereby cause a redemption of the trust preferred securities.

In 2011, Old National acquired Monroe Bancorp Capital Trust I and Monroe Bancorp Statutory Trust II in conjunction with its acquisition of Monroe Bancorp. Old National guarantees the payment of distributions on the trust preferred securities issued by Monroe Bancorp Capital Trust I and Monroe Bancorp Statutory Trust II. Monroe Bancorp Capital Trust I issued $3.0 million in preferred securities in July 2006. The preferred securities carried a fixed rate of interest of 7.15% until October 7, 2011 and thereafter a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 160 basis points. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by Monroe Bancorp Capital Trust I. Monroe Bancorp Statutory Trust II issued $5.0 million in preferred securities in March 2007. The preferred securities carried a fixed rate of interest of 6.52% until June 15, 2012 and thereafter a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 160 basis points. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by Monroe Bancorp Statutory Trust II. Old National, at any time, may redeem the junior subordinated debentures at par and thereby cause a redemption of the trust preferred securities in whole or in part.

In 2012, Old National acquired Home Federal Statutory Trust I in conjunction with its acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp. Old National guarantees the payment of distributions on the trust preferred securities issued by Home Federal Statutory Trust I. Home Federal Statutory Trust I issued $15.0 million in preferred securities in September 2006. The preferred securities carry a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 165 basis points. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by Home Federal Statutory Trust I. Old National, at any time, may redeem the junior subordinated debentures at par and thereby cause a redemption of the trust preferred securities in whole or in part.

CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATION

On January 1, 2004, Old National entered into a long-term capital lease obligation for a branch office building in Owensboro, Kentucky, which extends for 25 years with one renewal option for 10 years. The economic substance of this lease is that Old National is financing the acquisition of the building through the lease and accordingly, the building is recorded as an asset and the lease is recorded as a liability. The fair value of the capital lease obligation was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on Old National’s current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

 

38


Table of Contents

At March 31, 2013, the future minimum lease payments under the capital lease were as follows:

 

(dollars in thousands)

      

2013 remaining

   $ 292   

2014

     410   

2015

     410   

2016

     410   

2017

     410   

Thereafter

     9,675   
  

 

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

     11,607   

Less amounts representing interest

     7,409   
  

 

 

 

Present value of net minimum lease payments

   $ 4,198   
  

 

 

 

NOTE 14—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

RETIREMENT PLAN

Old National maintains a funded noncontributory defined benefit plan (the “Retirement Plan”) that was frozen as of December 31, 2005. Retirement benefits are based on years of service and compensation during the highest paid five years of employment. The freezing of the plan provides that future salary increases will not be considered. Old National’s policy is to contribute at least the minimum funding requirement determined by the plan’s actuary. Old National expects to contribute approximately $180 thousand to the Retirement Plan in 2013.

Old National also maintains an unfunded pension restoration plan (the “Restoration Plan”) which provides benefits for eligible employees that are in excess of the limits under Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that apply to the Retirement Plan. The Restoration Plan is designed to comply with the requirements of ERISA. The entire cost of the plan, which was also frozen as of December 31, 2005, is supported by contributions from the Company.

Old National contributed $33 thousand to cover benefit payments from the Restoration Plan during the first three months of 2013. Old National expects to contribute an additional $90 thousand to cover benefit payments from the Restoration Plan during the remainder of 2013.

The net periodic benefit cost and its components were as follows for the three months ended March 31:

 

     Three Months Ended  
     March 31,  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012  

Interest cost

   $ 435      $ 493   

Expected return on plan assets

     (551     (586

Recognized actuarial loss

     580        1,006   

Settlement

     279        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 743      $ 913   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

On September 15, 2012, Old National assumed Indiana Bank and Trust’s Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions. This defined benefit pension plan has been frozen since April 1, 2008. The trustees of the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund administer the Pentegra Plan, employer identification number 13-5645888 and plan number 333. The Pentegra Plan operates as a multi-employer plan for accounting purposes and as a multiple-employer plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code.

 

39


Table of Contents

The Pentegra Plan is a single plan under Internal Revenue Code Section 413(c) and, as a result, all of the assets stand behind all of the liabilities. Accordingly, under the Pentegra Plan contributions made by a contributing employer may be used to provide benefits to participants of other participating employers. There is no separate valuation of the Pentegra Plan benefits or segregation of the Pentegra Plan assets specifically for a company, because the Pentegra Plan is a multi-employer plan and separate actuarial valuations are not made with respect to each employer. The funded status of the Pentegra Plan, or the market value of plan assets divided by funding target, as of July 1, 2012 and 2011 was 101.2% and 84.4%, respectively.

Old National has given notice to withdraw from the plan and has recorded an estimated $13.4 million termination liability in Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities. As of December 31, 2012, this purchase accounting entry increased goodwill by $8.2 million after tax.

NOTE 15—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

At March 31, 2013, Old National had 5.1 million shares remaining available for issuance under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan. The granting of awards to key employees is typically in the form of restricted stock awards or units.

Restricted Stock Awards

The Company granted 75 thousand time-based restricted stock awards to certain key officers during the first quarter of 2013, with shares vesting at the end of a thirty-six month period. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Shares are subject to certain restrictions and risk of forfeiture by the participants. As of March 31, 2013, unrecognized compensation expense was estimated to be $1.9 million for unvested restricted share awards.

Old National recorded expense of $0.2 million, net of tax, during the first three months of 2013, compared to income of $48 thousand during the first three months of 2012 related to the vesting of restricted share awards. Included in the first three months of 2012 is the reversal of $0.4 million of expense associated with certain performance-based restricted stock grants.

In connection with the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp on September 15, 2012, 15 thousand unvested Indiana Community Bancorp restricted stock awards were converted to 29 thousand unvested Old National restricted stock awards. These restricted stock awards vested December 31, 2012 upon the retirement of the participant with the remaining expense of $23 thousand accelerated into the fourth quarter of 2012.

Restricted Stock Units

The Company granted 295 thousand shares of performance based restricted stock units to certain key officers during the first quarter of 2013, with shares vesting at the end of a thirty-six month period based on the achievement of certain targets. For certain awards, the level of performance could increase or decrease the percentage of shares earned. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Shares are subject to certain restrictions and risk of forfeiture by the participants.

Old National recorded $0.4 million of stock based compensation expense, net of tax, during the first three months of 2013. Old National recorded $0.3 million of stock based compensation expense, net of tax, during the first three months of 2012. Included in the first three months of 2012 is the reversal of $20 thousand of expense associated with certain performance-based restricted stock grants.

Stock Options

Old National has not granted stock options since 2009. However, in connection with the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp on September 15, 2012, 0.2 million options for shares of Indiana Community Bancorp stock were converted to 0.3 million options for shares of Old National Bancorp stock. Old National recorded no incremental expense associated with the conversion of these options.

Old National did not record any stock based compensation expense related to stock options during the first three months of 2013. Old National recorded $6 thousand of stock based compensation expense, net of tax, during the first three months of 2012.

 

40


Table of Contents

NOTE 16—INCOME TAXES

Following is a summary of the major items comprising the differences in taxes from continuing operations computed at the federal statutory rate and as recorded in the consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 31:

 

     Three Months Ended  
     March 31,  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012  

Provision at statutory rate of 35%

   $ 12,018      $ 10,522   

Tax-exempt income

     (2,897     (2,510

State income taxes

     1,216        894   

Interim period effective rate adjustment

     135        17   

Other, net

     (80     (583
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense

   $ 10,392      $ 8,340   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Effective tax rate

     30.3     27.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

In accordance with ASC 740-270, Accounting for Interim Reporting, the provision for income taxes was recorded at March 31, 2013 and 2012 based on the current estimate of the effective annual rate.

For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the effective tax rate was higher than the three months ended March 31, 2012. The higher tax rate in the first three months of 2013 is the result of an increase in projected pre-tax book income while tax-exempt income remained relatively stable.

No valuation allowance was recorded at March 31, 2013 and 2012 because, based on our current expectations, Old National believes that it will generate sufficient income in the future years to realize deferred tax assets.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, as well as filing various state returns. Unrecognized state income tax benefits are reported net of their related deferred federal income tax benefit.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

(dollars in thousands)

   2013      2012  

Balance at January 1

   $ 3,953       $ 4,145   

Additions (reductions) based on tax positions related to the current year

     —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at March 31

   $ 3,953       $ 4,145   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Approximately $0.16 million of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods.

NOTE 17—DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

As part of the Company’s overall interest rate risk management, Old National uses derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps and floors. The notional amount of these derivative instruments was $41.0 million at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 balances consist of $41.0 million notional amount of receive-fixed interest rate swaps on certain of its FHLB advances. These hedges were entered into to manage both interest rate risk and asset sensitivity on the balance sheet. These derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value.

 

41


Table of Contents

In addition, commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate lock commitments) and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors are considered derivatives. At March 31, 2013, the notional amount of the interest rate lock commitments and forward commitments were $26.2 million and $35.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the notional amount of the interest rate lock commitments and forward commitments were $23.4 million and $32.0 million, respectively. It is the Company’s practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans to third party investors when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from its commitment to fund the loans. All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value.

Old National also enters into derivative instruments for the benefit of its customers. The notional amounts of these customer derivative instruments and the offsetting counterparty derivative instruments were $432.0 million and $432.0 million, respectively, at March 31, 2013. At December 31, 2012, the notional amounts of the customer derivative instruments and the offsetting counterparty derivative instruments were $456.1 million and $456.1 million, respectively. These derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting. These instruments include interest rate swaps, caps, foreign exchange forward contracts and commodity swaps and options. Commonly, Old National will economically hedge significant exposures related to these derivative contracts entered into for the benefit of customers by entering into offsetting contracts with approved, reputable, independent counterparties with substantially matching terms.

Credit risk arises from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Old National’s exposure is limited to the replacement value of the contracts rather than the notional, principal or contract amounts. There are provisions in our agreements with the counterparties that allow for certain unsecured credit exposure up to an agreed threshold. Exposures in excess of the agreed thresholds are collateralized. In addition, the Company minimizes credit risk through credit approvals, limits, and monitoring procedures.

The following tables summarize the fair value of derivative financial instruments utilized by Old National:

 

     Asset Derivatives  
     March 31, 2013      December 31, 2012  
     Balance             Balance         
     Sheet      Fair      Sheet      Fair  

(dollars in thousands)

   Location      Value      Location      Value  

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

           

Interest rate contracts

     Other assets       $ 5,833         Other assets       $ 6,458   
     

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments

      $ 5,833          $ 6,458   
     

 

 

       

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

           

Interest rate contracts

     Other assets       $ 25,635         Other assets       $ 29,475   

Mortgage contracts

     Other assets         625         Other assets         579   
     

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

      $ 26,260          $ 30,054   
     

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total derivative assets

      $ 32,093          $ 36,512   
     

 

 

       

 

 

 
     Liability Derivatives  
     March 31, 2013      December 31, 2012  

(dollars in thousands)

   Balance
Sheet
Location
     Fair
Value
     Balance
Sheet
Location
     Fair
Value
 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

           

Interest rate contracts

     Other liabilities       $ 26,108         Other liabilities       $ 29,909   

Mortgage contracts

     Other liabilities         —           Other liabilities         101   
     

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

      $ 26,108          $ 30,010   
     

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total derivative liabilities

      $ 26,108          $ 30,010   
     

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

42


Table of Contents

The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

 

         Three months     Three months  
         ended     ended  

(dollars in thousands)

       March 31, 2013     March 31, 2012  

Derivatives in

Fair Value Hedging

Relationships

   Location of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative
  Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative
 

Interest rate contracts (1)

   Interest income / (expense)   $ 477      $ 621   

Interest rate contracts (2)

   Other income / (expense)     27        171   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     $ 504      $ 792   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Derivatives in

Cash Flow Hedging

Relationships

   Location of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative
  Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative
 

Interest rate contracts (1)

   Interest income / (expense)   $ —        $ 241   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     $ —        $ 241   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Derivatives Not Designated as

Hedging Instruments

   Location of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative
  Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative
 

Interest rate contracts (3)

   Other income / (expense)   $ (39   $ 10   

Mortgage contracts

   Mortgage banking revenue     147        147   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     $ 108      $ 157   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Amounts represent the net interest payments as stated in the contractual agreements.
(2) Amounts represent ineffectiveness on derivatives designated as fair value hedges.
(3) Includes the valuation differences between the customer and offsetting counterparty swaps.

See Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 18—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

LITIGATION

In the normal course of business, Old National Bancorp and its subsidiaries have been named, from time to time, as defendants in various legal actions. Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages.

Old National contests liability and/or the amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases where claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or where investigations and proceedings are in the early stages, Old National cannot predict with certainty the loss or range of loss, if any, related to such matters, how or if such matters will be resolved, when they will ultimately be resolved, or what the eventual settlement, or other relief, if any, might be. Subject to the foregoing, Old National believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of such pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Old National, although the outcome of such matters could be material to Old National’s operating results and cash flows for a particular future period, depending on, among other things, the level of Old National’s revenues or income for such period. Old National will accrue for a loss contingency if (1) it is probable that a future event will occur and confirm the loss and (2) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.

 

43


Table of Contents

In November 2010, Old National was named in a class action lawsuit in Vanderburgh County Circuit Court challenging Old National Bank’s checking account practices associated with the assessment of overdraft fees. On May 1, 2012, the plaintiff was granted permission to file a First Amended Complaint which named additional plaintiffs and amended certain claims. The plaintiffs seek damages and other relief, including restitution On June 13, 2012, Old National filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, which was subsequently denied by the Court. On September 7, 2012, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification, which was granted on March 20, 2013, and provides for a class of “All Old National Bank customers in the State of Indiana who had one or more consumer accounts and who, within the applicable statutes of limitation through August 15, 2010, incurred an overdraft fee as a result of Old National Bank’s practice of sequencing debit card and ATM transactions from highest to lowest.” Old National sought an interlocutory appeal on April 2, 2013, and the trial court has stayed proceedings pending the Court of Appeals accepting jurisdiction of the appeal. Old National believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims brought by the plaintiffs. At this phase of the litigation, it is not possible for management of Old National to determine the probability of a material adverse outcome or reasonably estimate the amount of any loss.

LEASES

Old National rents certain premises and equipment under operating leases, which expire at various dates. Many of these leases require the payment of property taxes, insurance premiums, maintenance and other costs. In some cases, rentals are subject to increase in relation to a cost-of-living index. The leases have original terms ranging from less than one year to twenty-four years, and Old National has the right, at its option, to extend the terms of certain leases for four additional successive terms of five years. The Company does not have any material sub-lease agreements.

CREDIT-RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In the normal course of business, Old National’s banking affiliates have entered into various agreements to extend credit, including loan commitments of $1.287 billion and standby letters of credit of $69.1 million at March 31, 2013. At March 31, 2013, approximately $1.245 billion of the loan commitments had fixed rates and $42 million had floating rates, with the floating interest rates ranging from 0% to 21%. At December 31, 2012, loan commitments were $1.253 billion and standby letters of credit were $63.4 million. These commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the balance of the allowance for unfunded loan commitments was $4.5 million and $4.0 million, respectively.

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Old National had credit extensions of $12.6 million and $13.3 million, respectively, with various unaffiliated banks related to letter of credit commitments issued on behalf of Old National’s clients. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Old National provided collateral to the unaffiliated banks to secure credit extensions totaling $11.3 million and $11.2 million, respectively. Old National did not provide collateral for the remaining credit extensions.

NOTE 19—FINANCIAL GUARANTEES

Old National holds instruments, in the normal course of business with clients, that are considered financial guarantees in accordance with FASB ASC 460-10 (FIN 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others), which requires the Company to record the instruments at fair value. Standby letters of credit guarantees are issued in connection with agreements made by clients to counterparties. Standby letters of credit are contingent upon failure of the client to perform the terms of the underlying contract. Credit risk associated with standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that associated with extending loans to clients and is subject to normal credit policies. The term of these standby letters of credit is typically one year or less. At March 31, 2013, the notional amount of standby letters of credit was $69.1 million, which represents the maximum amount of future funding requirements, and the carrying value was $0.4 million. At December 31, 2012, the notional amount of standby letters of credit was $63.4 million, which represents the maximum amount of future funding requirements, and the carrying value was $0.4 million.

During the second quarter of 2007, Old National entered into a risk participation in an interest rate swap. The interest rate swap had a notional amount of $8.3 million at March 31, 2013.

NOTE 20—SEGMENT INFORMATION

Old National operates in two operating segments: community banking and treasury. The community banking segment serves customers in both urban and rural markets providing a wide range of financial services including commercial, real estate and consumer loans; lease financing; checking, savings, time deposits and other depository accounts; cash management services; and debit cards and other electronically accessed banking services and Internet banking. Treasury manages investments, wholesale funding, interest rate risk, liquidity and leverage for Old National. Additionally, treasury provides other miscellaneous capital markets products for its corporate banking clients. Other is comprised of the parent company and several smaller business units including insurance, wealth management and brokerage. It includes unallocated corporate overhead and intersegment revenue and expense eliminations.

 

44


Table of Contents

In order to measure performance for each segment, Old National allocates capital and corporate overhead to each segment. Capital and corporate overhead are allocated to each segment using various methodologies, which are subject to periodic changes by management. Intersegment sales and transfers are not significant.

Old National uses a funds transfer pricing (“FTP”) system to eliminate the effect of interest rate risk from net interest income in the community banking segment and from companies included in the “other” column. The FTP system is used to credit or charge each segment for the funds the segments create or use. The net FTP credit or charge is reflected in segment net interest income.

The financial information for each operating segment is reported on the basis used internally by Old National’s management to evaluate performance and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other financial institution.

Summarized financial information concerning segments is shown in the following table for the three months ended March 31:

 

(dollars in thousands)

   Community
Banking
    Treasury     Other      Total  

Three months ended March 31, 2013

         

Net interest income

   $ 67,405      $ (3,606   $ 15,251       $ 79,050   

Provision for loan losses

     (355     —          1,200         845   

Noninterest income

     14,454        2,674        29,187         46,315   

Noninterest expense

     46,914        2,466        40,803         90,183   

Income (loss) before income taxes

     35,300        (3,398     2,435         34,337   

Total assets

     4,908,103        4,168,349        597,239         9,673,691   

Three months ended March 31, 2012

         

Net interest income

   $ 69,432      $ (6,390   $ 11,231       $ 74,273   

Provision for loan losses

     (254     —          2,310         2,056   

Noninterest income

     26,736        2,456        19,941         49,133   

Noninterest expense

     61,819        2,112        27,356         91,287   

Income (loss) before income taxes

     34,603        (6,046     1,506         30,063   

Total assets

     4,504,681        3,537,169        539,208         8,581,058   

Included in net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 in the Community Banking segment is approximately $8.7 million associated with Indiana Community Bancorp (“IBT”), acquired on September 15, 2012. Included in noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 in the Community Banking segment is approximately $2.0 million associated with the acquisition of IBT.

Noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 includes $1.4 million of costs in the Community Banking segment associated with the acquisition of IBT.

NOTE 21 – FAIR VALUE

FASB ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

 

   

Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

 

 

45


Table of Contents
   

Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

   

Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

Old National used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:

Investment securities: The fair values for investment securities are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3). Discounted cash flows are calculated using swap and libor curves plus spreads that adjust for loss severities, volatility, credit risk and optionality. During times when trading is more liquid, broker quotes are used (if available) to validate the model. Rating agency and industry research reports as well as defaults and deferrals on individual securities are reviewed and incorporated into the calculations.

Residential loans held for sale: The fair value of loans held for sale is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset, adjusted for specific attributes of that loan (Level 2).

Derivative financial instruments: The fair values of derivative financial instruments are based on derivative valuation models using market data inputs as of the valuation date (Level 2).

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial assets and liabilities for which the Company has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:

 

            Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2013 Using  
                   Significant         
            Quoted Prices in      Other      Significant  
            Active Markets for      Observable      Unobservable  
     Carrying      Identical Assets      Inputs      Inputs  

(dollars in thousands)

   Value      (Level 1)      (Level 2)      (Level 3)  

Financial Assets

           

Trading securities

   $ 3,217       $ 3,217       $ —         $ —     

Investment securities available-for-sale:

           

U.S. Treasury

     11,582         11,582         —           —     

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

     404,740         —           404,740         —     

Mortgage-backed securities—Agency

     1,519,988         —           1,519,988         —     

Mortgage-backed securities—Non-agency

     28,023         —           28,023         —     

States and political subdivisions

     665,339         —           664,664         675   

Pooled trust preferred securities

     8,554         —           —           8,554   

Other securities

     210,184         32,527         177,657         —     

Residential loans held for sale

     14,583         —           14,583         —     

Derivative assets

     32,093         —           32,093         —     

Financial Liabilities

           

Derivative liabilities

     26,108         —           26,108         —     

 

46


Table of Contents
            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using  
                   Significant         
            Quoted Prices in      Other      Significant  
            Active Markets for      Observable      Unobservable  
     Carrying      Identical Assets      Inputs      Inputs  

(dollars in thousands)

   Value      (Level 1)      (Level 2)      (Level 3)  

Financial Assets

           

Trading securities

   $ 3,097       $ 3,097       $ —         $ —     

Investment securities available-for-sale:

           

U.S. Treasury

     11,841         11,841         —           —     

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

     517,325         —           517,325         —     

Mortgage-backed securities—Agency

     1,163,788         —           1,163,788         —     

Mortgage-backed securities—Non-agency

     30,196         —           30,196         —     

States and political subdivisions

     577,324         —           576,340         984   

Pooled trust preferred securities

     9,359         —           —           9,359   

Other securities

     190,951         32,762         158,189         —     

Residential loans held for sale

     12,591         —           12,591         —     

Derivative assets

     36,512         —           36,512         —     

Financial Liabilities

           

Derivative liabilities

     30,010         —           30,010         —     

The table below presents a reconciliation of all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2013:

 

     Fair Value Measurements using  
     Significant Unobservable Inputs  
     (Level 3)  
     Pooled Trust Preferred     State and  
     Securities Available-     Political  

(dollars in thousands)

   for-Sale     Subdivisions  

Beginning balance, January 1, 2013

   $ 9,359      $ 984   

Accretion/(amortization) of discount or premium

     4        1   

Sales/payments received

     (1,323     —     

Matured securities

     —          (310

Credit loss write-downs

     —          —     

Increase/(decrease) in fair value of securities

     514        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance, March 31, 2013

   $ 8,554      $ 675   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Included in the income statement is $5 thousand of income included in interest income from the accretion of discounts on securities. The increase in fair value is reflected in the balance sheet as an increase in the fair value of investment securities available-for sale, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is included in shareholders’ equity, and a decrease in other assets related to the tax impact.

$32.8 million of mutual fund securities were transferred to Level 1 as of December 31, 2012 because Old National could obtain quoted prices for the securities.

 

47


Table of Contents

The table below presents a reconciliation of all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2012:

 

     Fair Value Measurements using  
     Significant Unobservable Inputs  
     (Level 3)  
     Pooled Trust Preferred     State and  
     Securities Available-     Political  

(dollars in thousands)

   for-Sale     Subdivisions  

Beginning balance, January 1, 2012

   $ 7,327      $ 1,306   

Accretion/(amortization) of discount or premium

     4        2   

Payments received

     (15     —     

Matured securities

     —          (320

Increase/(decrease) in fair value of securities

     481        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance, March 31, 2012

   $ 7,797      $ 988   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Included in the income statement is $6 thousand of income included in interest income from the accretion of discounts on securities. The increase in fair value is reflected in the balance sheet as an increase in the fair value of investment securities available-for sale, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is included in shareholders’ equity, and a decrease in other assets related to the tax impact.

The table below provides quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:

 

    Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value  Measurements
    Fair Value at     Valuation   Unobservable   Range (Weighted

(dollars in thousands)

  March 31, 2013     Techniques  

Input

  Average)

Pooled trust preferred securities

  $ 8,554      Discounted cash flow   Constant prepayment rate (a)   0.00%
      Additional asset defaults (b)   1% -32%(8%)
      Expected asset recoveries (c)   3% -21%(14%)

State and political subdivision securities

    675      Discounted cash flow   No unobservable inputs   NA
      Illiquid local municipality issuance
      Old National owns 100%  
      Carried at par  

 

(a) Assuming no prepayments.
(b) Each currently performing pool asset is assigned a default probability based on the banking environment, which is adjusted for specific issuer evaluation, of 0%, 50% or 100%.
(c) Each currently defaulted pool asset is assigned a recovery probability based on specific issuer evaluation of 0%, 25% or 100%.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement for pooled trust preferred securities are prepayment rates, assumed additional pool asset defaults and expected return to performing status of defaulted pool assets. Significant changes in any of the inputs in isolation would result in a significant change to the fair value measurement. Three of the five pooled trust preferred securities Old National owns are subordinate note classes that rely on an ongoing cash flow stream to support their values. The senior note classes receive the benefit of prepayments to the detriment of subordinate note classes since the ongoing interest cash flow stream is reduced by the early redemption. Generally, a change in prepayment rates or additional pool asset defaults has an impact that is directionally opposite from a change in the expected recovery of a defaulted pool asset.

 

48


Table of Contents

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:

 

            Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2013 Using  
                   Significant         
            Quoted Prices in      Other      Significant  
            Active Markets for      Observable      Unobservable  
     Carrying      Identical Assets      Inputs      Inputs  

(dollars in thousands)

   Value      (Level 1)      (Level 2)      (Level 3)  

Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans

           

Commercial loans

   $ 11,881         —           —         $ 11,881   

Commercial real estate loans

     12,015         —           —           12,015   

Foreclosed Assets

           

Commercial real estate

     23,869         —           —           23,869   

Residential

     598         —           —           598   

Impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans that are deemed collateral dependent are valued based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. These estimates are based on the most recently available appraisals with certain adjustments made based on the type of property, age of appraisal, current status of the property and other related factors to estimate the current value of the collateral. These impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans had a principal amount of $30.7 million, with a valuation allowance of $6.8 million at March 31, 2013. Old National recorded $1.2 million of provision expense associated with these loans for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Other real estate owned and other repossessed property is measured at fair value less costs to sell and had a net carrying amount of $24.5 million. The estimates of fair value are based on the most recently available appraisals with certain adjustments made based on the type of property, age of appraisal, current status of the property and other related factors to estimate the current value of the collateral. These appraisals are discounted 0% to 45% depending on the type of property and the type of appraisal (market value vs. liquidation value). There were net write-downs of other real estate owned of $0.6 million in the first three months of 2013.

 

            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using  
                   Significant         
            Quoted Prices in      Other      Significant  
            Active Markets for      Observable      Unobservable  
     Carrying      Identical Assets      Inputs      Inputs  

(dollars in thousands)

   Value      (Level 1)      (Level 2)      (Level 3)  

Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans

           

Commercial loans

   $ 14,159         —           —         $ 14,159   

Commercial real estate loans

     13,111         —           —           13,111   

Foreclosed Assets

           

Commercial real estate

     24,032         —           —           24,032   

Residential

     471         —           —           471   

As of December 31, 2012, impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans had a principal amount of $34.1 million, with a valuation allowance of $6.8 million. Old National recorded $4.0 million of provision expense associated with these loans in 2012.

Other real estate owned and other repossessed property is measured at fair value less costs to sell and had a net carrying amount of $24.5 million at December 31, 2012. There were write-downs of other real estate owned of $15.3 million in 2012.

 

49


Table of Contents

The table below provides quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:

 

    Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements  

(dollars in thousands)

  Fair Value at
March 31, 2013
   

Valuation Techniques

 

Unobservable Input

  Range (Weighted
Average)
 

Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans

       

Commercial loans

  $ 11,881      Fair value of collateral   Discount for type of property, age of appraisal and current status     0%-50%(25%)   

Commercial real estate loans

    12,015      Fair value of collateral   Discount for type of property, age of appraisal and current status     10%-40%(25%)   

Foreclosed Assets

       

Commercial real estate

    23,869      Fair value of collateral   Discount for type of property, age of appraisal and current status     10%-40%(25%)   

Residential

    598      Fair value of collateral   Discount for type of property, age of appraisal and current status     10%-45%(25%)   

Collateral dependent loans, other real estate owned and other repossessed property are valued based on the most recently available appraisals with certain adjustments made based on the type of property, age of appraisal, current status of the property and other related factors to estimate the current value of the collateral. These appraisals are discounted depending on the type of property and the type of appraisal (market value vs. liquidation value).

Financial instruments recorded using fair value option

Under FASB ASC 825-10, the Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in net income. After the initial adoption, the election is made at the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair value election may not be revoked once an election is made.

The Company has elected the fair value option for residential mortgage loans held for sale. For these loans, interest income is recorded in the consolidated statements of income based on the contractual amount of interest income earned on the financial assets (except any that are on nonaccrual status). None of these loans are 90 days or more past due, nor are any on nonaccrual status. Included in the income statement are $101 thousand and $31 thousand of interest income for residential loans held for sale for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

Old National has elected the fair value option for newly originated conforming fixed-rate and adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held for sale. These loans are intended for sale and are hedged with derivative instruments. Old National has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplification. The fair value option was not elected for loans held for investment.

As of March 31, 2013, the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate remaining principal balance for loans for which the fair value option has been elected is as follows. Accrued interest at period end is included in the fair value of the instruments.

 

     Aggregate             Contractual  

(dollars in thousands)

   Fair Value      Difference      Principal  

Residential loans held for sale

   $ 14,583       $ 411       $ 14,172   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

50


Table of Contents

The following table presents the amount of gains and losses from fair value changes included in income before income taxes for financial assets carried at fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2013:

 

Changes in Fair Value for the Three Months ended March 31, 2013, for Items

Measured at Fair Value Pursuant to Election of the Fair Value Option

 

(dollars in thousands)

   Other
Gains and
(Losses)
     Interest
Income
     Interest
(Expense)
     Total Changes
in Fair Values
Included in
Current Period
Earnings
 

Residential loans held for sale

   $ 54       $ 3       $ —         $ 57   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of March 31, 2012, the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate remaining principal balance for loans for which the fair value option has been elected was as follows. Accrued interest at period end is included in the fair value of the instruments.

 

     Aggregate             Contractual  

(dollars in thousands)

   Fair Value      Difference      Principal  

Residential loans held for sale

   $ 3,883       $ 53       $ 3,830   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents the amount of gains and losses from fair value changes included in income before income taxes for financial assets carried at fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2012:

 

Changes in Fair Value for the Three Months ended March 31, 2012, for Items

Measured at Fair Value Pursuant to Election of the Fair Value Option

 

(dollars in thousands)

   Other
Gains and
(Losses)
    Interest
Income
     Interest
(Expense)
     Total Changes
in Fair Values
Included in
Current Period
Earnings
 

Residential loans held for sale

   $ (46   $ —         $ —         $ (46
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

51


Table of Contents

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments, not previously presented in this note, at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:

 

            Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2013 Using  

(dollars in thousands)

   Carrying
Value
     Quoted
Prices in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets

(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

March 31, 2013

           

Financial Assets

           

Cash, due from banks, federal funds sold and money market investments

   $ 153,903       $ 153,903       $ —         $ —     

Investment securities held-to-maturity:

           

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

     173,120         —           186,968         —     

Mortgage-backed securities—Agency

     50,187         —           52,672         —     

State and political subdivisions

     169,072         —           183,685         —     

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     37,927         —           37,927         —     

Loans, net (including covered loans):

           

Commercial

     1,344,249         —           —           1,388,492   

Commercial real estate

     1,355,786         —           —           1,421,839   

Residential real estate

     1,383,432         —           —           1,500,354   

Consumer credit

     975,094         —           —           1,001,692   

FDIC indemnification asset

     109,861         —           —           92,622   

Accrued interest receivable

     46,575         110         19,950         26,515   

Financial Liabilities

           

Deposits:

           

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

   $ 1,973,265       $ 1,973,265       $ —         $ —     

NOW, savings and money market deposits

     3,902,855         3,902,855         —           —     

Time deposits

     1,190,199                 1,212,468         —     

Short-term borrowings:

           

Federal funds purchased

     306,986         306,986         —           —     

Repurchase agreements

     337,035         337,033         —           —     

Other borrowings:

           

Junior subordinated debenture

     28,000         —           16,590         —     

Repurchase agreements

     50,000         —           53,939         —     

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     455,224         —           —           468,988   

Capital lease obligation

     4,198         —           5,623         —     

Accrued interest payable

     3,005         —           3,005         —     

Standby letters of credit

     350         —           —           350   

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

           

Commitments to extend credit

   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ 2,253   

 

52


Table of Contents
            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using  

(dollars in thousands)

   Carrying
Value
     Quoted Prices
in Active Markets
for Identical Assets

(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

December 31, 2012

           

Financial Assets

           

Cash, due from banks, federal funds sold and money market investments

   $ 264,060       $ 264,060       $ —         $ —     

Investment securities held-to-maturity:

           

U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies

     173,936         —           188,263         —     

Mortgage-backed securities—Agency

     56,612         —           58,919         —     

State and political subdivisions

     169,282         —           183,021         —     

Other securities

     2,998         —           2,998         —     

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     37,927         —           37,927         —     

Loans, net (including covered loans):

           

Commercial

     1,377,817         —           —           1,424,103   

Commercial real estate

     1,407,420         —           —           1,475,066   

Residential real estate

     1,356,922         —           —           1,458,672   

Consumer credit

     999,672         —           —           1,030,990   

FDIC indemnification asset

     115,738         —           —           106,090   

Accrued interest receivable

     46,979         43         20,701         26,235   

Financial Liabilities

           

Deposits:

           

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

   $ 2,007,770       $ 2,007,770       $ —         $ —     

NOW, savings and money market deposits

     3,989,902         3,989,902         —           —     

Time deposits

     1,281,281                 1,308,111         —     

Short-term borrowings:

           

Federal funds purchased

     231,688         231,688         —           —     

Repurchase agreements

     358,127         358,123         —           —     

Other borrowings:

           

Junior subordinated debenture

     28,000         —           16,255         —     

Repurchase agreements

     50,000         —           53,422         —     

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     155,323         —                   170,664   

Capital lease obligation

     4,211         —           5,657         —     

Accrued interest payable

     3,308         —           3,308         —     

Standby letters of credit

     357         —           —           357   

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

           

Commitments to extend credit

   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ 2,305   

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument.

Cash, due from banks, federal funds sold and resell agreements and money market investments: For these instruments, the carrying amounts approximate fair value (Level 1).

Investment securities: Fair values for investment securities held-to-maturity are based on quoted market prices, if available. For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are estimated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2).

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock: Old National Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank system. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. FHLB stock is carried at cost and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank (Level 2).

 

53


Table of Contents

Loans: The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities (Level 3).

Covered loans: Fair values for loans were based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considered factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and a discount rate reflecting current market rates for new originations of comparable loans adjusted for the risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. Loans were grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques (Level 3).

FDIC indemnification asset: The loss sharing asset was measured separately from the related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the assets and is not transferable with the assets should the Bank choose to dispose of the assets. Fair value was originally estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreement based on the expected reimbursements for losses and the applicable loss sharing percentage and these projected cash flows are updated with the cash flow estimates on covered assets. These cash flows were discounted to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss sharing reimbursement from the FDIC (Level 3).

Accrued interest receivable and payable: The carrying amount approximates fair value and is aligned with the underlying assets or liabilities (Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3).

Deposits: The fair value of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and savings, NOW and money market deposits is the amount payable as of the reporting date (Level 1). The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities (Level 2).

Short-term borrowings: Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings generally have an original term to maturity of 30 days or less and, therefore, their carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value (Level 1). The fair value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase is determined using end of day market prices (Level 1).

Other borrowings: The fair value of medium-term notes, subordinated debt and senior bank notes is determined using market quotes (Level 2). The fair value of FHLB advances is determined using calculated prices for new FHLB advances with similar risk characteristics (Level 3). The fair value of other debt is determined using comparable security market prices or dealer quotes (Level 2).

Standby letters of credit: Fair values for standby letters of credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. The fair value for standby letters of credit was recorded in “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheet in accordance with FASB ASC 460-10 (FIN 45) (Level 3).

Off-balance sheet financial instruments: Fair values for off-balance sheet credit-related financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. For further information regarding the amounts of these financial instruments, see Notes 18 and 19.

 

54


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion is an analysis of our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and financial condition as of March 31, 2013, compared to March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2012. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes. This discussion contains forward-looking statements concerning our business that are based on estimates and involves certain risks and uncertainties. Therefore, future results could differ significantly from our current expectations and the related forward-looking statements.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

During the first quarter of 2013, net income was $23.9 million, or $0.24 per share. This compares favorably to the $21.7 million, or $0.23 per share reported in the first quarter of 2012. The improvement in earnings year over year is primarily attributable to a $4.8 million increase in net interest income. Net interest income for the first quarter of 2013 benefited from our acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp and the accretion associated with the purchased credit impaired loans, the growth in our residential mortgage loan portfolio, and a decrease in higher yielding time deposits.

The Company sold nine former Integra branch locations during the quarter; receiving a deposit premium of $2.2 million, and announced its intent to enter into the southwest lower Michigan market through the acquisition of 24 Bank of America branches.

In addition to targeting additional partnerships, management continues to look for ways to enhance the Company’s efficiency ratio. The Company is focused on both revenue enhancement and operating efficiency opportunities as it strives to meet its aspirational efficiency ratio of 65%. Partially offsetting these initiatives, however, is the Company’s continued focus on compliance with the June 4, 2012, consent order issued by our primary regulator, which resulted in increased professional fees of $1.7 million during the first quarter of 2013.

Credit quality remains well-controlled with net charge offs to average loans of 0.17% at March 31, 2013 compared to 0.36% a year ago. Non-performing loans to total loans improved to 4.30% compared to 5.85% at March 31, 2012.

 

55


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth certain income statement information of Old National for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

     Three Months Ended        
     March 31,     %  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012     Change  

Income Statement Summary:

      

Net interest income

   $ 79,050      $ 74,273        6.4

Provision for loan losses

     845        2,056        (58.9

Noninterest income

     46,315        49,133        (5.7

Noninterest expense

     90,183        91,287        (1.2

Other Data:

      

Return on average common equity

     8.00     8.34  

Efficiency ratio (1)

     68.34        70.88     

Tier 1 leverage ratio

     8.71        8.78     

Net charge-offs to average loans

     0.17        0.36     

 

(1) Efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense before amortization of intangibles as a percent of fully taxable net interest income and noninterest income, excluding net gains from securities transactions. This presentation excludes intangible amortization and net securities gains, as is common in other company disclosures, and better aligns with true operating performance. This is a non-GAAP financial measure that management believes to be helpful in understanding old National’s results of operations.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is our most significant component of earnings, comprising over 63% of revenues at March 31, 2013. Net interest income and margin are influenced by many factors, primarily the volume and mix of earning assets, funding sources and interest rate fluctuations. Other factors include level of accretion income on purchased loans, prepayment risk on mortgage and investment-related assets and the composition and maturity of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Loans typically generate more interest income than investment securities with similar maturities. Funding from client deposits generally cost less than wholesale funding sources. Factors such as general economic activity, Federal Reserve Board monetary policy and price volatility of competing alternative investments, can also exert significant influence on our ability to optimize the mix of assets and funding and the net interest income and margin.

Net interest income is the excess of interest received from earning assets over interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. For analytical purposes, net interest income is also presented in the table that follows, adjusted to a taxable equivalent basis to reflect what our tax-exempt assets would need to yield in order to achieve the same after-tax yield as a taxable asset. We used the federal statutory tax rate in effect of 35% for all periods adjusted for the TEFRA interest disallowance applicable to certain tax-exempt obligations. This analysis portrays the income tax benefits associated in tax-exempt assets and helps to facilitate a comparison between taxable and tax-exempt assets. Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest margin and net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes these measures provide useful information for both management and investors by allowing them to make peer comparisons.

 

56


Table of Contents
     Three Months Ended  
     March 31,  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012  

Net interest income

   $ 79,050      $ 74,273   

Taxable equivalent adjustment

     3,912        3,051   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income—taxable equivalent

   $ 82,962      $ 77,324   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Average earning assets

   $ 8,210,526      $ 7,362,100   

Net interest margin

     3.85     4.04

Net interest margin—fully taxable equivalent

     4.04     4.20

Net interest income was $79.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, up from the $74.3 million reported for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Taxable equivalent net interest income was $83.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, up from the $77.3 million reported for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis was 4.04% for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 4.20% for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in net interest income is primarily due to the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp (“IBT”) on September 15, 2012, combined with a change in the mix of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The accretion associated with the purchased assets from IBT benefited net interest margin by $5.1 million, or 25 basis points during the three months ended March 31, 2013. We expect this accretion income to decline over time. The decrease in the net interest margin is primarily due to the yield on average earning assets decreasing faster than the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The yield on interest earning assets decreased 34 basis points while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 26 basis points in the quarterly year-over-year comparison.

Average earning assets were $8.211 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $7.362 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2012, an increase of 11.5%, or $848.4 million. Included in average earning assets for the three months ended March 31, 2013 is approximately $386.6 million from the Indiana Community Bancorp acquisition, which was acquired on September 15, 2012. Significantly affecting average earning assets at March 31, 2013 compared to March 31, 2012, was the increase in the size of the loan portfolio combined with an increase in the size of the investment portfolio. Year over year, the investment portfolio, which generally has an average yield lower than the loan portfolio, has increased as a percent of interest earning assets and was approximately 39% of interest earnings assets at March 31, 2013.

The $436.1 million increase in average loans is primarily a result of the remaining $386.2 million of average loans acquired in the IBT acquisition. We have continued to experience growth in our residential mortgage loan portfolio, but continue to experience declines in our acquired loan portfolios.

The $337.3 million increase in the investment portfolio is in anticipation of the pending Bank of America branch acquisition. While this transaction is still subject to regulatory approval, we anticipate acquiring approximately $700 million of cash and assuming approximately $745 million of deposits. As a consequence, Old National has begun buying securities when rates are favorable in advance of the expected close in July of 2013. The investment purchases are being funded with short term borrowings which will be retired when the cash is received. The Company currently expects it will remain below $10 billion in assets and will not be subject to certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Positively affecting margin were increases in noninterest-bearing demand deposits and short-term borrowings combined with a decrease in time deposits. The increase in short-term borrowings, as discussed above, is in anticipation of the branch acquisition from Bank of America. Over the past year, we have reduced the cost of our other borrowings by changing the composition of other borrowings. During the first quarter of 2013, we terminated a $25 million FHLB advance and restructured $33.4 million of FHLB advances. During the fourth quarter of 2012, we terminated $50.0 million of FHLB advances. On June 30, 2012 we redeemed $13.0 million of subordinated notes and $3.0 million of trust preferred securities. Year over year, time deposits, which have an average interest rate higher than other types of deposits, have decreased as a percent of total funding. Year over year, short-term borrowings, which have an average interest rate lower than many types of funding, have increased as a percent of total funding. Year over year, noninterest-bearing demand deposits have remained stable as a percent of total funding.

 

57


Table of Contents

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Impacting the provision over the past twelve months are the following factors: (1) the loss factors applied to our performing loan portfolio have decreased over time as charge-offs were substantially lower, (2) the continuing trend in improved credit quality, and (3) the percentage of our legacy loan portfolio consisting of those loans where higher loss factors are applied (commercial and commercial real estate loans) fell while the percentage of our loan portfolio consisting of those loans where lower loss factors are applied (residential loans) increased.

Noninterest Income

We generate revenues in the form of noninterest income through client fees and sales commissions from our core banking franchise and other related businesses, such as wealth management, investment consulting, investment products and insurance. Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $46.3 million, a decrease of $2.8 million, or 5.7%, from the $49.1 million reported for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease is primarily the result of adjustments to the FDIC indemnification asset and a decrease in service charges on deposit accounts. Partially offsetting these decreases were increases from insurance premiums and commissions and the gain on branch divestitures.

Net securities gains were $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to net securities gains of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Included in the $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2012 were other-than-temporary-impairment charges of $96 thousand on three non-agency mortgage-backed securities.

Wealth management fees, which are dependent on the managed assets performance, continue to be impacted by uncertainties in the investment markets. Wealth management fees did increase by $0.6 million to $5.7 million in the first quarter of 2013, primarily due to the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp on September 15, 2012.

Service charges and overdraft fees on deposit accounts, our largest source of noninterest income, continued to decline. Service charges and overdraft fees were $11.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $12.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease is primarily attributable to a $1.5 million decrease in overdraft charges due to changes in customer behavior along with approximately $0.3 million of lost fee revenue from the 9 branches sold in the first quarter of 2013.

Mortgage banking revenue was $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Mortgage banking revenue increased primarily as a result of an increase in gain on sale of loans, as we sold more production to the secondary market.

Insurance premiums and commissions increased $1.3 million to $10.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to $9.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, primarily as a result of higher contingency income.

Investment product fees increased $0.7 million, or 22.2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase is primarily as a result of increases in annuity fees and mutual fund fees.

During the third quarter of 2012, Old National announced plans to sell the deposits of nine banking centers in southern Illinois and western Kentucky. The sales closed during the first quarter of 2013. Deposits at the time of sale were approximately $150.1 million and we received a deposit premium of $2.2 million on the sales.

 

58


Table of Contents

Other income increased $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase is primarily a result of increases in customer derivative fee revenue and gains on sales of foreclosed properties.

Noninterest Income Related to Covered Assets

Income and expense associated with the FDIC loss sharing agreements is reflected in the change in the FDIC indemnification asset. This balance includes discount accretion, gains on the write-up of the FDIC indemnification asset, and expense from the reduction of the FDIC indemnification asset upon the removal of loans, OREO and unfunded loan commitments. Loans are removed when they have been fully paid off, fully charged off, sold or transferred to OREO. The change in the FDIC indemnification asset also includes income due to the FDIC, as well as the income statement effects of other loss share transactions.

For the first quarter of 2013, adjustments to the FDIC indemnification asset resulted in noninterest expense of $2.3 million. This compares to noninterest income of $4.8 million during the first quarter of 2012. The first quarter of 2012 included $7.2 million of income associated with the impairment of covered other real estate owned, compared to $0.4 million of income associated with impairment of covered other real estate owned in the first quarter of 2013.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013, totaled $90.2 million, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 1.2%, from the $91.3 million recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Included in the first quarter of 2013 is approximately $1.4 million of noninterest expense related to Indiana Community Bancorp, which was acquired on September 15, 2012. A decrease in other real estate expense is the primary reason for the decrease in noninterest expense. Partially offsetting this decrease were increases in salaries and benefits expense and other expense.

Salaries and benefits is the largest component of noninterest expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, salaries and benefits were $51.0 million compared to $46.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Included in the first quarter of 2013 is an increase of $1.2 million for salaries and benefits expense associated with former IBT associates. Also included in the first quarter of 2013 is a $1.2 million increase in performance-based incentive compensation, a $0.9 million increase in hospitalization expense, a $0.6 million increase in commission expense and a $0.4 million increase in employment taxes.

Professional fees increased $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase is primarily attributable to other professional fees associated with the BSA/AML consent order. Continued compliance with the June 4, 2012, consent order issued by our primary regulator resulted in increased professional fees during the first quarter of 2013 as the Company continues to progress on this project. The consent order requires the Bank to, among other things: continue to review, update, and implement a written institution-wide, ongoing BSA/AML risk assessment that accurately identifies BSA/AML risks; ensure that Bank management reviews, updates, and implements its risk-based processes to obtain and analyze appropriate customer due diligence information to monitor for and investigate suspicious activity; ensure adherence to a written program for appropriate identification, analyzing and monitoring of transactions with greater than normal risk; maintain an effective BSA independent testing function; and ensure and maintain sufficient personnel with requisite expertise and skills who receive adequate on-going training. These costs were partially offset by decreases in legal and auditing fees.

Other real estate owned expense was $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $9.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The majority of the 2012 expense was associated with other real estate properties acquired from the FDIC; 80% of which was offset by a corresponding adjustment to the FDIC indemnification asset.

Amortization of intangibles was $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase is primarily due to an adjustment to core deposit intangible amortization expense related to the sale of the nine branches during the first quarter of 2013.

 

59


Table of Contents

Other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013, totaled $4.2 million, an increase of $2.3 million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. Included in expense for 2013 is approximately $0.7 million for loss on extinguishment of debt regarding the termination of a $25.0 million FHLB advance and a change of approximately $1.0 million year over year in the provision for unfunded commitments.

Noninterest Expense Related to Covered Assets

Noninterest expense related to covered assets are included in OREO expense, legal and professional expense and other covered asset-related expenses, and may be subject to FDIC reimbursement. Expenses must meet certain FDIC criteria in order for the expense amounts to be reimbursed. Certain amounts reflected in these balances may not be reimbursed by the FDIC if they do not meet the criteria.

$123 thousand, or twenty percent of the expense associated with holding and maintaining covered assets assumed in the Integra acquisition, are not reimbursable by the FDIC and were recorded as noninterest expense during the first quarter of 2013. The remaining eighty percent was recorded as a receivable from the FDIC. Additional non-reimbursable expenses of $122 thousand associated with holding and maintaining covered assets assumed in the Integra acquisition were also recorded in noninterest expense during the first quarter of 2013.

$288 thousand, or twenty percent of the expense associated with holding and maintaining covered assets assumed in the Integra acquisition, are not reimbursable by the FDIC and were recorded as noninterest expense during the first quarter of 2012. The remaining eighty percent was recorded as a receivable from the FDIC. Additional non-reimbursable expenses of $106 thousand associated with holding and maintaining covered assets assumed in the Integra acquisition were also recorded in noninterest expense during the first quarter of 2012.

Provision for Income Taxes

We record a provision for income taxes currently payable and for income taxes payable or benefits to be received in the future, which arise due to timing differences in the recognition of certain items for financial statement and income tax purposes. The major difference between the effective tax rate applied to our financial statement income and the federal statutory tax rate is caused by interest on tax-exempt securities and loans. The provision for income taxes, as a percentage of pre-tax income, was 30.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 27.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2012. In accordance with ASC 740-270, Accounting for Interim Reporting, the provision for income taxes was recorded at March 31, 2013 based on the current estimate of the effective annual rate. The higher tax rate in the first three months of 2013 is the result of an increase in projected pre-tax book income while tax-exempt income remained relatively stable. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Overview

At March 31, 2013, our assets were $9.674 billion, a 12.7% increase compared to March 31, 2012 assets of $8.581 billion, and an increase of 1.4% compared to December 31, 2012 assets of $9.544 billion. The increase in assets is primarily the result of an increase in the investment portfolio in anticipation of the acquisition of 24 branches from Bank of America in the third quarter of 2013 and an increase in the loan portfolio from March 31, 2012, which is primarily a result of the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp during the third quarter of 2012. Year over year, we have reduced our reliance on higher cost deposits. Time deposits, which have an average interest rate higher than other types of deposits, have decreased as a percent of total funding. Year over year, short-term borrowings, which have an average interest rate lower than many types of funding, have increased as a percent of total funding. Year over year, noninterest-bearing demand deposits have remained stable as a percent of total funding.

 

60


Table of Contents

Earning Assets

Our earning assets are comprised of investment securities, portfolio loans, loans held for sale, money market investments, interest earning accounts with the Federal Reserve and trading securities. Earning assets were $8.429 billion at March 31, 2013, an increase of 13.3% from March 31, 2012.

Investment Securities

We classify the majority of our investment securities as available-for-sale to give management the flexibility to sell the securities prior to maturity if needed, based on fluctuating interest rates or changes in our funding requirements. However, we do have $50.2 million of 15- and 20-year fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities, $173.1 million of U.S. government-sponsored entity and agency securities and $169.1 million of state and political subdivision securities in our held-to-maturity investment portfolio at March 31, 2013. During the third quarter of 2012, approximately $46.1 million of state and political subdivision securities were transferred from the held-to-maturity portfolio to the available-for-sale portfolio due to changes in circumstances associated with the Office of Management and Budget’s report outlining sequestration and the implications for taxable Build America Bonds.

Trading securities, which consist of mutual funds held in a trust associated with deferred compensation plans for former Monroe Bancorp directors and executives, are recorded at fair value and totaled $3.2 million at March 31, 2013 compared to $3.0 million at March 31, 2012.

At March 31, 2013, the total investment securities portfolio was $3.282 billion compared to $2.758 billion at March 31, 2012, an increase of $523.6 million or 19.0%. Investment securities increased $337.3 million compared to December 31, 2012, an increase of 11.5%. Investment securities represented 38.9% of earning assets at March 31, 2013, compared to 37.1% at March 31, 2012, and 35.9% at December 31, 2012. The increase in the investment portfolio is in anticipation of the acquisition of the 24 branches from Bank of America. Stronger commercial loan demand in the future and management’s efforts to deleverage the balance sheet could result in a reduction in the securities portfolio. As of March 31, 2013, management does not intend to sell any securities with an unrealized loss position and does not believe the Company will be required to sell such securities.

The investment securities available-for-sale portfolio had net unrealized gains of $49.2 million at March 31, 2013, an increase of $3.0 million compared to net unrealized gains of $46.2 million at March 31, 2012, and a decrease of $14.8 million compared to net unrealized gains of $64.0 million at December 31, 2012. No other-than-temporary-impairment charge was recorded during the first three months of 2013. A $96 thousand charge was recorded during the first three months of 2012 related to other-than-temporary-impairment on three non-agency mortgage-backed securities. See the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the impact of other-than-temporary-impairment in other comprehensive income and Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for details on management’s evaluation of securities for other-than-temporary-impairment.

The investment portfolio had an average duration of 4.06 at March 31, 2013, compared to 3.89 at March 31, 2012, and 3.71 at December 31, 2012. Effective duration measures the percentage change in value of the portfolio in response to a change in interest rates. Generally, there is more uncertainty in interest rates over a longer average maturity, resulting in a higher duration percentage. The annualized average yields on investment securities, on a taxable equivalent basis, were 2.96% for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 3.33% for the three months ended March 31, 2012, and 3.02% for the three months ended December 31, 2012.

Residential Loans Held for Sale

Residential loans held for sale were $14.6 million at March 31, 2013, compared to $3.9 million at March 31, 2012, and $12.6 million at December 31, 2012. At March 31, 2013, loans held for sale was made up entirely of mortgage loans held for immediate sale in the secondary market with servicing released. These loans are sold at or prior to origination at a contracted price to an outside investor on a best efforts basis and remain on the Company’s balance sheet for a short period of time (typically 30 to 60 days). These loans are sold without recourse and Old National has experienced no material losses. Mortgage originations are subject to volatility due to interest rates and home sales.

 

61


Table of Contents

We have elected the fair value option under FASB ASC 825-10 (SFAS No. 159) prospectively for residential loans held for sale. The aggregate fair value exceeded the unpaid principal balances by $0.4 million and $0.1 million as of March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the aggregate fair value exceeded the unpaid principal balances by $0.4 million.

Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Loans

Commercial and commercial real estate loans, including covered loans, are the second largest classification within earning assets, representing 32.6% of earning assets at March 31, 2013, a decrease from 34.8% at March 31, 2012, and a decrease from 34.5% at December 31, 2012. At March 31, 2013, commercial and commercial real estate loans, including covered loans, were $2.745 billion, an increase of $152.3 million since March 31, 2012, and a decrease of $85.7 million since December 31, 2012. Included in the total for March 31, 2013 is approximately $221.1 million related to our acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp. Loan demand in our markets remains soft. However, if you exclude covered loans and the recently acquired IBT loans, we did experience modest loan growth in the commercial portfolio during the past twelve months.

Consumer Loans

At March 31, 2013, consumer loans, including automobile loans, personal and home equity loans and lines of credit, increased $12.9 million or 1.3% compared to March 31, 2012, and decreased $25.0 million or 2.5% since December 31, 2012. Included in the total for March 31, 2013 is approximately $68.2 million related to our acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp.

Residential Real Estate Loans

At March 31, 2013, residential real estate loans, including covered loans, held in our loan portfolio were $1.387 billion, an increase of $26.2 million, or 1.9%, from December 31, 2012 and an increase of $283.5 million, or 25.7%, from March 31, 2012. In addition to organic loan production, March 31, 2013 totals also include approximately $73.0 million acquired from Indiana Community Bancorp. The majority of the growth in residential real estate loans began in the fourth quarter of 2010, primarily as a result of a new mortgage product that was introduced. At March 31, 2013, this new product had an average FICO score of 779, an average loan to value ratio of 60% and an average duration of 17.8 years. We have also retained more of our loan originations to partially offset the slow loan demand from our traditional commercial customers.

Covered Assets

On July 29, 2011, Old National acquired the banking operations of Integra Bank N.A. (“Integra”) in an FDIC assisted transaction. The Company entered into separate loss sharing agreements with the FDIC providing for specified credit loss protection for substantially all acquired single family residential loans, commercial loans, and other real estate owned (“OREO”). Loans comprise the majority of the assets acquired and are subject to loss share agreements with the FDIC whereby Old National is indemnified against 80% of losses up to $275.0 million, losses in excess of $275.0 million up to $467.2 million at 0% reimbursement, and 80% of losses in excess of $467.2 million with respect to covered assets. As of March 31, 2013, we do not expect losses to exceed $275.0 million.

A summary of covered assets is presented below:

 

     March 31,      December 31,  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013      2012  

Loans, net of discount & allowance

   $ 320,229       $ 366,617   

Other real estate owned

     26,114         26,137   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total covered assets

   $ 346,343       $ 392,754   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

62


Table of Contents

FDIC Indemnification Asset

Because the FDIC will reimburse Old National for losses incurred on certain acquired loans, an indemnification asset is recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The indemnification asset is recognized at the same time as the indemnified loans, and measured on the same basis, subject to collectibility or contractual limitations. The indemnification asset, on the acquisition date, reflects the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an appropriate discount rate, which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties. Reimbursement claims are submitted to the FDIC and the receivable is reduced when the FDIC pays the claim. At March 31, 2013, the FDIC indemnification asset was $109.9 million and was comprised of a $97.2 million FDIC indemnification asset and a $12.7 million FDIC loss share receivable. The loss share receivable represents actual incurred losses where reimbursement has not yet been received from the FDIC. The indemnification asset represents future cash flows the Company expects to collect from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements and the amount related to the estimated improvements in cash flow expectations that are being amortized over the same period for which those improved cash flows are being accreted into income. At March 31, 2013, $84.3 million of the FDIC indemnification asset related to expected indemnification payments and $12.9 million is expected to be amortized and reported in noninterest income as an offset to future accreted interest income.

A summary of activity for the indemnification asset and loss share receivable is presented below:

 

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012  

Balance at January 1,

   $ 116,624      $ 168,881   

Adjustments not reflected in income:

    

Established through acquisitions

     —          —     

Cash received from FDIC

     (3,923     (20,372

Loan expenses to be reimbursed

     380        1,029   

Other

     (918     (1

Adjustments reflected in income:

    

(Amortization) accretion

     (1,612     (2,938

Impairment

     120        —     

Write-downs/sale of other real estate

     372        7,160   

Recovery amounts due to FDIC

     (1,243     —     

Other

     61        542   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31,

   $ 109,861      $ 154,301   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and other intangible assets at March 31, 2013, totaled $365.5 million, an increase of $80.7 million compared to $284.8 million at March 31, 2012, and a decrease of $2.5 million compared to $368.0 million at December 31, 2012. During the third quarter of 2012, we recorded $88.6 million of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp, of which $85.9 million is included in the “Community Banking” column and $2.7 million is included in the “Other” column for segment reporting. The decrease from December 31, 2012 is primarily attributable to amortization expense associated with other intangible assets.

Assets Held for Sale

Assets held for sale were $10.4 million at March 31, 2013 compared to $15.0 million at December 31, 2012. Included in assets held for sale are three financial centers associated with the Integra acquisition and four facilities associated with the Monroe Bancorp acquisition. The decrease is due to the branch sales that occurred in the first quarter of 2013.

Other Assets

Other assets have increased $36.6 million, or 18.5%, since March 31, 2012 primarily a result of an increase in deferred tax assets, which was partially offset by fluctuations in the fair value of derivative financial instruments.

 

63


Table of Contents

Funding

Total funding, comprised of deposits and wholesale borrowings, was $8.247 billion at March 31, 2013, an increase of 12.8% from $7.310 billion at March 31, 2012, and an increase of 1.7% from $8.106 billion at December 31, 2012. Included in total funding were deposits of $7.066 billion at March 31, 2013, an increase of $398.5 million, or 6.0%, compared to March 31, 2012, and a decrease of $212.6 million, or 2.9%, compared to December 31, 2012. The decrease from December 31, 2012 is primarily attributable to the $150.1 million of deposits that were sold in conjunction with our branch sale in the first quarter of 2013. Included in total deposits at March 31, 2013 are $597.3 million from the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased 11.6%, or $205.3 million, compared to March 31, 2012. Savings deposits increased 14.6%, or $244.7 million. NOW deposits increased 8.6% or $133.2 million compared to March 31, 2012. Money market deposits decreased 0.2%, or $0.6 million, while time deposits decreased 13.4% or $184.1 million compared to March 31, 2012. We continue to experience an increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits.

We use wholesale funding to augment deposit funding and to help maintain our desired interest rate risk position. At March 31, 2013, wholesale borrowings, including short-term borrowings and other borrowings, increased $538.6 million, or 83.9%, from March 31, 2012 and increased $353.5 million, or 42.7%, from December 31, 2012, respectively. Included in wholesale funding at March 31, 2013 is $17.4 million from the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp. Wholesale funding as a percentage of total funding was 14.3% at March 31, 2013, compared to 8.8% at March 31, 2012, and 10.2% at December 31, 2012. Short-term borrowings have increased $291.3 million since March 31, 2012 while long-term borrowings have increased $247.3 million since March 31, 2012. The increase in wholesale funding is in anticipation of the pending branch acquisition from Bank of America, when the increased deposit funding will replace both the short-term and other borrowings. Over the past year, we have reduced the cost of other borrowings by changing the composition of other borrowings. During the first quarter of 2013, we terminated a $25 million FHLB advance and restructured $33.4 million of FHLB advances. During the fourth quarter of 2012, we terminated $50.0 million of FHLB advances. On June 30, 2012 we redeemed $13.0 million of subordinated notes and $3.0 million of trust preferred securities. Much of the increase in other borrowings during the first quarter of 2013 has involved FHLB advances with short maturities.

Capital

Shareholders’ equity totaled $1.200 billion at March 31, 2013, compared to $1.050 billion at March 31, 2012, and $1.195 billion at December 31, 2012. The March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 balances include approximately $88.5 million from the approximately 6.6 million shares of common stock that were issued in the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp.

We paid cash dividends of $0.10 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2013, which reduced equity by $10.1 million. We paid cash dividends of $0.09 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2012, which reduced equity by $8.5 million. We repurchased shares of our stock, reducing shareholders’ equity by $1.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013, and $0.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2012. The repurchases related primarily to our employee stock based compensation plans. The change in unrealized losses on investment securities decreased equity by $9.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013, and increased equity by $3.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2012. Shares issued for reinvested dividends, stock options, restricted stock and stock compensation plans increased shareholders’ equity by $1.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $0.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Capital Adequacy

Old National and the banking industry are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. At March 31, 2013, Old National and its bank subsidiary exceeded the regulatory minimums and Old National Bank met the regulatory definition of well-capitalized based on the most recent regulatory definition. To be categorized as well-capitalized, the bank subsidiary must maintain at least a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.0%. Goodwill of $85.6 million, core deposit intangibles of $1.3 million and customer relationship intangibles of $1.7 million were recorded in conjunction with the Indiana Community Bancorp acquisition. Such goodwill and intangibles are excluded from regulatory capital as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.

 

64


Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2013, Old National’s consolidated capital position remains strong as evidenced by the following comparisons of key industry ratios.

 

    

Regulatory

Guidelines

    March 31,     December 31,  
     Minimum     2013     2012     2012  

Risk-based capital:

        

Tier 1 capital to total avg assets (leverage ratio)

     4.00     8.71     8.78     8.53

Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted total assets

     4.00        14.10        13.98        13.63   

Total capital to risk-adjusted total assets

     8.00        15.14        15.41        14.69   

Shareholders’ equity to assets

     N/A        12.40        12.24        12.52   

As of March 31, 2013, Old National Bank, Old National’s bank subsidiary, maintained a strong capital position as evidenced by the following comparisons of key industry ratios.

 

    

Regulatory

Guidelines

    Well
Capitalized
    March 31,     December 31,  
     Minimum     Guidelines     2013     2012     2012  

Risk-based capital:

          

Tier 1 capital to total avg assets (leverage ratio)

     4.00     5.00     8.00     8.02     7.57

Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted total assets

     4.00        6.00        12.91        12.81        12.08   

Total capital to risk-adjusted total assets

     8.00        10.00        13.96        14.00        13.14   

RISK MANAGEMENT

Overview

Management, with the oversight of the Board of Directors through its Risk and Credit Policy Committee and its Funds Management Committee, has in place company-wide structures, processes, and controls for managing and mitigating risk. The following discussion addresses the three major risks that we face: credit, market, and liquidity.

Credit Risk

Credit risk represents the risk of loss arising from an obligor’s inability or failure to meet contractual payment or performance terms. Our primary credit risks result from our investment and lending activities.

Investment Activities

Within our securities portfolio, the non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations represent the greatest exposure to the current instability in the residential real estate and credit markets. At March 31, 2013, we had six non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations with a fair value of $28.0 million or approximately 0.98% of the available-for-sale securities portfolio. Five of these securities were rated below investment grade. The net unrealized gain on these securities at March 31, 2013, was approximately $0.7 million.

While the overall residential real estate market has stabilized, we expect conditions to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. Deterioration in the performance of the underlying loan collateral could result in deterioration in the performance of our asset-backed securities. Five non-agency mortgage-backed securities were rated below investment grade as of March 31, 2013. During the first quarter of 2013, one non-agency mortgage-backed security that was below investment grade paid down. There was no other-than-temporary-impairment recorded in the first quarter of 2013 on these securities. During the first quarter of 2012, we experienced $96 thousand of other-than-temporary-impairment losses on three of these securities, which was recorded as a credit loss in earnings.

 

65


Table of Contents

We also carry a higher exposure to loss in our pooled trust preferred securities, which are collateralized debt obligations, due to illiquidity in that market and the performance of the underlying collateral. At March 31, 2013, we had pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of approximately $8.6 million, or 0.3% of the available-for-sale securities portfolio. During the first quarter of 2013, we experienced no other-than-temporary-impairment losses on these securities. These securities remained classified as available-for-sale and at March 31, 2013, the unrealized loss on our pooled trust preferred securities was approximately $14.6 million. During the first quarter of 2012, we experienced no other-than-temporary-impairment on these securities.

The remaining mortgage-backed securities are backed by U.S. government-sponsored or federal agencies. Municipal bonds, corporate bonds and other debt securities are evaluated by reviewing the credit-worthiness of the issuer and general market conditions. We do not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that we will not be required to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery.

Included in the held-to-maturity category at March 31, 2013 are approximately $50.2 million of agency mortgage-backed securities and $169.1 million of municipal securities at amortized cost.

Counterparty Exposure

Counterparty exposure is the risk that the other party in a financial transaction will not fulfill its obligation in a financial transaction. We define counterparty exposure as nonperformance risk in transactions involving federal funds sold and purchased, repurchase agreements, correspondent bank relationships, and derivative contracts with companies in the financial services industry. Old National’s net counterparty exposure was an asset of $238.7 million at March 31, 2013.

Lending Activities

Commercial

Commercial and industrial loans are made primarily for the purpose of financing equipment acquisition, expansion, working capital, and other general business purposes. Lease financing consists of direct financing leases and are used by commercial customers to finance capital purchases ranging from computer equipment to transportation equipment. The credit decisions for these transactions are based upon an assessment of the overall financial capacity of the applicant. A determination is made as to the applicant’s ability to repay in accordance with the proposed terms as well as an overall assessment of the risks involved. In addition to an evaluation of the applicant’s financial condition, a determination is made of the probable adequacy of the primary and secondary sources of repayment, such as additional collateral or personal guarantees, to be relied upon in the transaction. Credit agency reports of the applicant’s credit history supplement the analysis of the applicant’s creditworthiness.

Commercial mortgages and construction loans are offered to real estate investors, developers, and builders primarily domiciled in the geographic market areas we serve, primarily Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky. These loans are secured by first mortgages on real estate at loan-to-value (“LTV”) margins deemed appropriate for the property type, quality, location and sponsorship. Generally, these LTV ratios do not exceed 80%. The commercial properties are predominantly non-residential properties such as retail centers, apartments, industrial properties and, to a lesser extent, more specialized properties. Substantially all of our commercial real estate loans are secured by properties located in our primary market area.

In the underwriting of our commercial real estate loans, we obtain appraisals for the underlying properties. Decisions to lend are based on the economic viability of the property and the creditworthiness of the borrower. In evaluating a proposed commercial real estate loan, we primarily emphasize the ratio of the property’s projected net cash flows to the loan’s debt service requirement. The debt service coverage ratio normally is not less than 120% and it is computed after deduction for a vacancy factor and property expenses as appropriate. In addition, a personal guarantee of the loan or a portion thereof is often required from the principal(s) of the borrower. We require title insurance insuring the priority of our lien, fire, and extended coverage casualty insurance, and flood insurance, if appropriate, in order to protect our security interest in the underlying property. In addition, business interruption insurance or other insurance may be required.

 

66


Table of Contents

Construction loans are underwritten against projected cash flows derived from rental income, business income from an owner-occupant or the sale of the property to an end-user. We may mitigate the risks associated with these types of loans by requiring fixed-price construction contracts, performance and payment bonding, controlled disbursements, and pre-sale contracts or pre-lease agreements.

Consumer

We offer a variety of first mortgage and junior lien loans to consumers within our markets, with residential home mortgages comprising our largest consumer loan category. These loans are secured by a primary residence and are underwritten using traditional underwriting systems to assess the credit risks of the consumer. Decisions are primarily based on LTV ratios, debt-to-income (“DTI”) ratios, liquidity and credit scores. A maximum LTV ratio of 80% is generally required, although higher levels are permitted with mortgage insurance or other mitigating factors. We offer fixed rate mortgages and variable rate mortgages with interest rates that are subject to change every year after the first, third, fifth, or seventh year, depending on the product and are based on fully-indexed rates such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). We do not offer interest-only loans, payment-option facilities, sub-prime loans, or any product with negative amortization.

Home equity loans are secured primarily by second mortgages on residential property of the borrower. The underwriting terms for the home equity product generally permits borrowing availability, in the aggregate, up to 90% of the appraised value of the collateral property at the time of origination. We offer fixed and variable rate home equity loans, with variable rate loans underwritten at fully-indexed rates. Decisions are primarily based on LTV ratios, DTI ratios, liquidity, and credit scores. We do not offer home equity loan products with reduced documentation.

Automobile loans include loans and leases secured by new or used automobiles. We originate automobile loans and leases primarily on an indirect basis through selected dealerships. We require borrowers to maintain collision insurance on automobiles securing consumer loans, with us listed as loss payee. Our procedures for underwriting automobile loans include an assessment of an applicant’s overall financial capacity, including credit history and the ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. Although an applicant’s creditworthiness is the primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral security to the proposed loan amount.

Asset Quality

Community-based lending personnel, along with region-based independent underwriting and analytic support staff, extend credit under guidelines established and administered by our Risk and Credit Policy Committee. This committee, which meets quarterly, is made up of outside directors. The committee monitors credit quality through its review of information such as delinquencies, credit exposures, peer comparisons, problem loans and charge-offs. In addition, the committee reviews and approves recommended loan policy changes to assure it remains appropriate for the current lending environment.

We lend primarily to small- and medium-sized commercial and commercial real estate clients in various industries including manufacturing, agribusiness, transportation, mining, wholesaling and retailing. At March 31, 2013, we had no concentration of loans in any single industry exceeding 10% of our portfolio and had no exposure to foreign borrowers or sovereign debt. Our policy is to concentrate our lending activity in the geographic market areas we serve, primarily Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky. We continue to be affected by weakness in the economy of our principal markets. Management expects that trends in under-performing, criticized and classified loans will be influenced by the degree to which the economy strengthens or weakens.

During the third quarter of 2011, Old National acquired the banking operations of Integra Bank in an FDIC assisted transaction. As of March 31, 2013, acquired loans totaled $369.1 million and there was $26.1 million of other real estate owned. The Company entered into separate loss sharing agreements with the FDIC providing for specified credit loss protection for substantially all acquired single family residential loans, commercial loans, and other real estate owned. In accordance with accounting for business combinations, there was no allowance brought forward on any of the acquired loans, as the credit losses evident in the loans were included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. At March 31, 2013, approximately $320.2 million of loans, net of allowance, and $26.1 million of other real estate owned are covered by the loss sharing agreements. Under the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will reimburse Old National for 80% of losses up to $275.0 million. These covered assets are included in our summary of under-performing, criticized and classified assets found below.

 

67


Table of Contents

On September 15, 2012, Old National closed on its acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp (“IBT”). As of March 31, 2013, acquired loans totaled $362.3 million and there was $1.5 million of other real estate owned. In accordance with accounting for business combinations, there was no allowance brought forward on any of the acquired loans, as the credit losses evident in the loans were included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. Old National reviewed the acquired loans and determined that as of March 31, 2013, $14.1 million met the definition of criticized, $17.1 million were considered classified, and $57.0 million were doubtful. Our current preference would be to work these loans and avoid foreclosure actions unless additional credit deterioration becomes apparent. These assets are included in our summary of under-performing, criticized and classified assets found below.

Summary of under-performing, criticized and classified assets:

 

68


Table of Contents
     March 31,     December 31,  

(dollars in thousands)

   2013     2012     2012  

Nonaccrual loans

      

Commercial

   $ 34,354      $ 31,717      $ 36,766   

Commercial real estate

     95,794        67,367        95,829   

Residential real estate

     9,764        9,833        11,986   

Consumer

     5,389        4,095        5,809   

Covered loans (5)

     65,171        158,523        103,946   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total nonaccrual loans (6)

     210,472        271,535        254,336   

Renegotiated loans not on nonaccrual

      

Noncovered loans

     9,101        1,055        9,155   

Covered loans

     35        —          35   

Past due loans (90 days or more and still accruing)

      

Commercial

     384        40        322   

Commercial real estate

     256        312        236   

Residential real estate

     1,075        —          66   

Consumer

     243        84        438   

Covered loans (5)

     30        820        15   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total past due loans

     1,988        1,256        1,077   

Other real estate owned

     9,103        6,474        11,179   

Other real estate owned, covered (5)

     26,114        24,705        26,137   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total under-performing assets

   $ 256,813      $ 305,025      $ 301,919   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Classified loans (includes nonaccrual, renegotiated, past
due 90 days and other problem loans)

   $ 221,742      $ 183,974      $ 233,445   

Classified loans, covered (5)

     81,399        186,000        121,977   

Other classified assets (3)

     57,017        106,353        59,202   

Criticized loans

     127,252        77,081        113,264   

Criticized loans, covered (5)

     14,240        20,163        9,344   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total criticized and classified assets

   $ 501,650      $ 573,571      $ 537,232   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Asset Quality Ratios including covered assets:

      

Non-performing loans/total loans (1) (2)

     4.30     5.85     5.07

Under-performing assets/total loans and other real estate owned (1)

     4.99        6.50        5.77   

Under-performing assets/total assets

     2.65        3.55        3.16   

Allowance for loan losses/under-performing assets (4)

     20.82        18.33        18.14   

Asset Quality Ratios excluding covered assets:

      

Non-performing loans/total loans (1) (2)

     3.23        2.77        3.31   

Under-performing assets/total loans and other real estate owned (1)

     3.45        2.94        3.55   

Under-performing assets/total assets

     1.71        1.41        1.80   

Allowance for loan losses/under-performing assets (4)

     28.59        45.24        28.55   

 

(1) Loans exclude residential loans held for sale and leases held for sale.
(2) Non-performing loans include nonaccrual and renegotiated loans.
(3) Includes 5 pooled trust preferred securities, 5 non-agency mortgage-backed securities and 4 corporate securities at March 31, 2013.
(4) Because the acquired loans from Monroe, Integra and Indiana Community were recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 805 at the date of acquisition, the credit risk is incorporated in the fair value recorded. No allowance for loan losses is recorded on the acquisition date.
(5) The Company entered into separate loss sharing agreements with the FDIC providing for specified credit loss protection for substantially all acquired single family residential loans, commercial loans and other real estate owned. At March 31, 2013, we expect eighty percent of any losses incurred on these covered assets to be reimbursed to Old National by the FDIC.
(6) Includes approximately $102.6 million of purchased credit impaired loans that are categorized as nonaccrual because the collection of principal or interest is doubtful. These loans are accounted for under FASB ASC 310-30 and accordingly treated as performing assets.

 

69


Table of Contents

Under-performing assets totaled $256.8 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of $48.2 million compared to $305.0 million at March 31, 2012, and a decrease of $45.1 million compared to $301.9 million at December 31, 2012. As a percent of total loans and other real estate owned, under-performing assets, at March 31, 2013, were 4.99%, a decrease from the March 31, 2012 ratio of 6.50% and a decrease from the December 31, 2012 ratio of 5.77%. Nonaccrual loans were $210.5 million at March 31, 2013, compared to $271.5 million at March 31, 2012, and $254.3 million at December 31, 2012. Because the acquired loans from Monroe Bancorp, Integra Bank and Indiana Community Bancorp were recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 805 at the date of acquisition, the credit risk is incorporated in the fair value recorded. No allowance for loan losses is recorded on the acquisition date. At March 31, 2013, under-performing assets related to covered assets acquired in the Integra Bank acquisition were approximately $91.4 million, which included approximately $65.2 million of nonaccrual loans, $0.1 million of past due loans and renegotiated loans and $26.1 million of other real estate owned. The nonaccrual covered loans are categorized in this manner because the collection of principal or interest is doubtful. However, they are accounted for under FASB ASC 310-30 and accordingly treated as performing assets. At March 31, 2013, under-performing assets related to Indiana Community Bancorp were approximately $58.5 million, which included approximately $57.0 million of nonaccrual loans and $1.5 million of other real estate owned.

Total classified and criticized assets were $501.7 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of $71.9 million from March 31, 2012, and a decrease of $35.5 million from December 31, 2012. Included in criticized and classified assets at March 31, 2013, is $88.2 million related to the acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp. Other classified assets include $57.0 million, $106.4 million and $59.2 million of investment securities that fell below investment grade rating at March 31, 2013, March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Old National may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain loans. The decision to restructure a loan, versus aggressively enforcing the collection of the loan, may benefit Old National by increasing the ultimate probability of collection.

Any loans that are modified are reviewed by Old National to identify if a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) has occurred, which is when for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Bank grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Terms may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay in line with its current financial status. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the terms of certain loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings. The modification of the terms of such loans included one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan, an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate of new debt with similar risk, or a permanent reduction of the recorded investment of the loan.

Loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are typically placed on nonaccrual status until the Company determines the future collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured, which generally requires that the borrower demonstrate a period of performance according to the restructured terms for six months.

If the Company is unable to resolve a nonperforming loan issue the credit will be charged off when it is apparent there will be a loss. For large commercial type loans, each relationship is individually analyzed for evidence of apparent loss based on quantitative benchmarks or subjectively based upon certain events or particular circumstances. It is Old National’s policy to charge off small commercial loans scored through our small business credit center with contractual balances under $250,000 that have been placed on nonaccrual status or became ninety days or more delinquent, without regard to the collateral position. For residential and consumer loans, a charge off is recorded at the time foreclosure is initiated or when the loan becomes 120 to 180 days past due, whichever is earlier.

For commercial and industrial troubled debt restructurings, an allocated reserve is established within the allowance for loan losses for the difference between the carrying value of the loan and its computed fair value. To determine the fair value of the loan, one of the following methods is selected: (1) the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, (2) the loan’s observable market price, or (3) the fair value of the collateral value, if the loan is collateral dependent. The allocated reserve is established as the difference between the carrying value of the loan and the collectable value. If there are significant changes in the amount or timing of the loan’s expected future cash flows, impairment is recalculated and the valuation allowance is adjusted accordingly.

 

70


Table of Contents

For consumer and residential troubled debt restructurings, an additional amount is added to the loan loss reserve that represents the difference in the present value of the cash flows between the original terms and the new terms of the modified loan, using the original effective interest rate of the loan as a discount rate.

At March 31, 2013, our troubled debt restructurings consisted of $12.0 million of commercial loans, $17.6 million of commercial real estate loans, $0.9 million of consumer loans and $0.5 million of residential loans, totaling $31.0 million. Approximately $20.8 million of the troubled debt restructuring at March 31, 2013 were included with nonaccrual loans. As of March 31, 2013, Old National had allocated specific reserves of $2.5 million to commercial loans and $0.8 million to commercial real estate loans for loans that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings. At December 31, 2012, our troubled debt restructurings consisted of $12.7 million of commercial loans, $18.4 million of commercial real estate loans, $0.5 million of consumer loans and $0.5 million of residential loans, totaling $32.1 million. Approximately $22.1 million of the troubled debt restructuring at December 31, 2012 were included with nonaccrual loans. As of December 31, 2012, Old National had allocated specific reserves of $3.7 million to commercial loans and $0.8 million to commercial real estate loans for loans that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings.

The terms of certain other loans were modified during the three months ended March 31, 2013 that did not meet the definition of a troubled debt restructuring. It is our process to review all classified and criticized loans that, during the period, have been renewed, have entered into a forbearance agreement, have gone from principal and interest to interest only, or have extended the maturity date. In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. The evaluation is performed under the Company’s internal underwriting policy. We also evaluate whether a concession has been granted or if we were adequately compensated through a market interest rate, additional collateral or a bona fide guarantee. We also consider whether the modification was insignificant relative to the other terms of the agreement or if the delay in a payment was 90 days or less.

Purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans are not considered impaired until after the point at which there has been a degradation of cash flows below our expected cash flows at acquisition. If a PCI loan is subsequently modified, and meets the definition of a TDR, it will be removed from PCI accounting and accounted for as a TDR only if the PCI loan was being accounted for individually. If the purchased credit impaired loan is being accounted for as part of a pool, it will not be removed from the pool.

In general, once a modified loan is considered a TDR, the loan will always be considered a TDR, and therefore impaired, until it is paid in full, otherwise settled, sold or charged off. However, our policy also permits for loans to be removed from troubled debt restructuring status in the years following the restructuring if the following two conditions are met: (1) The restructuring agreement specifies an interest rate equal to or greater than the rate that the Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk, and (2) the loan is not impaired based on the terms specified by the restructuring agreement.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments

Loan charge-offs, net of recoveries, totaled $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Annualized, net charge-offs to average loans were 0.17% for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to 0.36% for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Management will continue its efforts to reduce the level of non-performing loans and may consider the possibility of sales of troubled and non-performing loans, which could result in additional charge-offs to the allowance for loan losses.

To provide for the risk of loss inherent in extending credit, we maintain an allowance for loan losses. The determination of the allowance is based upon the size and current risk characteristics of the loan portfolio and includes an assessment of individual problem loans, actual loss experience, current economic events and regulatory guidance. At March 31, 2013, the allowance for loan losses was $53.5 million, a decrease of $2.4 million compared to $55.9 million at March 31, 2012, and a decrease of $1.3 million compared to $54.8 million at December 31, 2012. Impacting the allowance for loan losses and provision expense in 2013 are the following factors: (1) the loss factors applied to our performing loan portfolio have decreased over time as charge-offs were substantially lower, (2) the continuing trend in improved credit quality, and (3) the percentage of our legacy loan portfolio consisting of those loans where higher loss factors are applied (commercial and commercial real estate loans) fell while the percentage of our loan portfolio consisting of those loans where lower loss factors are applied (residential loans) increased. As a percentage of total loans excluding loans held for sale, the allowance was 1.05% at March 31, 2013, compared to 1.20% at March 31, 2012, and 1.05% at December 31, 2012. The decrease from March 31, 2012 is primarily a result of the loans acquired from Indiana Community Bancorp during the third quarter of 2012. Because the acquired loans were recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 805 at the date of acquisition, the credit risk is incorporated in the fair value recorded. No allowance for loan losses was recorded on the acquisition date. The provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2013, was $0.8 million compared to $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

 

71


Table of Contents

Because the acquired loans from Monroe Bancorp, Integra Bank and Indiana Community Bancorp were recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 805 at the date of acquisition, the credit risk is incorporated in the fair value recorded. No allowance for loan losses is recorded on the acquisition date. We would expect that as the fair value mark is accreted into income over future periods, a reserve will be established to absorb credit deterioration or adverse changes in expected cash flows. Through March 31, 2013, $3.9 million and $6.3 million had been reserved for these purchased credits from Monroe Bancorp and Integra Bank, respectively.

The following table provides additional details of the following components of the allowance for loan losses, including FAS 5 (Accounting for Contingencies), FAS 114 (Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan) and SOP 03-3 (Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer):

 

                 Purchased Loans  
     Legacy     Covered     Non-covered  

(dollars in thousands)

   FAS 5     FAS 114     FAS 5     FAS 114     SOP 03-3     FAS 5     FAS 114     SOP 03-3  

Loan balance

   $ 3,990,087      $ 48,684      $ 114,982      $ 877      $ 210,538      $ 651,896      $ 25,848      $ 69,130   

Remaining purchase discount

     —          —          8,762        —          119,045        29,252        7,662        35,656   

Allowance, January 1, 2013

     36,400        8,370        —          —          5,716        51        (78     4,304   

Charge-offs

     (1,808     (1,040     (317     (22     (645     (262     (639     (272

Recoveries

     1,183        1,096        —          13        (8     95        310        189   

Provision expense

     768        (1,618     317        9        1,105        116        407        (259
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allowance, March 31, 2013

   $ 36,543      $ 6,808      $ —        $ —        $ 6,168      $ —        $ —        $ 3,962   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

We maintain an allowance for losses on unfunded commercial lending commitments and letters of credit to provide for the risk of loss inherent in these arrangements. The allowance is computed using a methodology similar to that used to determine the allowance for loan losses, modified to take into account the probability of a drawdown on the commitment. The $4.5 million reserve for unfunded loan commitments at March 31, 2013 is classified as a liability account on the balance sheet. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments was $4.0 million at December 31, 2012.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk that the estimated fair value of our assets, liabilities, and derivative financial instruments will decline as a result of changes in interest rates or financial market volatility, or that our net income will be significantly reduced by interest rate changes.

The objective of our interest rate management process is to maximize net interest income while operating within acceptable limits established for interest rate risk and maintaining adequate levels of funding and liquidity.

 

72


Table of Contents

Potential cash flows, sales, or replacement value of many of our assets and liabilities, especially those that earn or pay interest, are sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates. This interest rate risk arises primarily from our normal business activities of gathering deposits and extending loans. Many factors affect our exposure to changes in interest rates, such as general economic and financial conditions, customer preferences, historical pricing relationships, and re-pricing characteristics of financial instruments. Our earnings can also be affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve Board. In managing interest rate risk, we, through the Funds Management Committee, a committee of the Board of Directors, establish guidelines, for asset and liability management, including measurement of short and long-term sensitivities to changes in interest rates. Based on the results of our analysis, we may use different techniques to manage changing trends in interest rates including:

 

   

adjusting balance sheet mix or altering interest rate characteristics of assets and liabilities;

 

   

changing product pricing strategies;

 

   

modifying characteristics of the investment securities portfolio; or

 

   

using derivative financial instruments, to a limited degree.

A key element in our ongoing process is to measure and monitor interest rate risk using a Net Interest Income at Risk simulation to model the interest rate sensitivity of the balance sheet and to quantify the impact of changing interest rates on the Company. The model quantifies the effects of various possible interest rate scenarios on projected net interest income over a one-year and a two-year cumulative horizon. The model assumes a semi-static balance sheet and measures the impact on net interest income relative to a base case scenario of hypothetical changes in interest rates over 24 months. The scenarios include prepayment assumptions, changes in the level of interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, and spreads between market interest rates in order to capture the impact from re-pricing, yield curve, option, and basis risks.

Our simulation scenarios assume the following market interest rates with an instantaneous shift from current interest rates.

 

     Hypothetical LIBOR/Swap Yield Curves, March 31, 2013  
     3-Month     6-Month     1-Year     2-Year     3-Year     5-Year     10-Year     20-Year     30-Year  

+ 3.00%

     3.28     3.44     3.73     3.42     3.54     3.95     5.01     5.81     5.99

+ 2.00%

     2.28     2.44     2.73     2.42     2.54     2.95     4.01     4.81     4.99

+ 1.00%

     1.28     1.44     1.73     1.42     1.54     1.95     3.01     3.81     3.99

Yield Curve at 3/31

     0.28     0.44     0.73     0.42     0.54     0.95     2.01     2.81     2.99

- 1.00%

     NA        NA        NA        NA        NA        NA        NA        NA        NA   

100 bp flattening of curve

                  

Short end

     1.28     1.44     1.73     1.42     0.54     0.95     2.01     2.81     2.99

Long end

     0.28     0.44     0.73     0.42     0.54     0.95     1.01     1.81     1.99

100 bp steepening of curve

                  

Short end

     0.00     0.00     0.00     0.00     0.54     0.95     2.01     2.81     2.99

Long end

     0.28     0.44     0.73     0.42     0.54     0.95     3.01     3.81     3.99

A key element in the measurement and modeling of interest rate risk are the re-pricing assumptions of our transaction deposit accounts, which have no contractual maturity dates. We assume this deposit base is comprised of both core and more volatile balances and consists of both non-interest bearing and interest bearing accounts. Core deposit balances are assumed to be less interest rate sensitive and provide longer term funding. Volatile balances are assumed to be more interest rate sensitive and shorter in term. As part of our semi-static balance sheet modeling, we assume interest rates paid on the volatile deposits move in conjunction with changes in interest rates, in order to retain these deposits. This may include current non-interest bearing accounts.

Results of our simulation modeling project that our net interest income could change as follows over one-year and two-year horizons, relative to our base case scenarios at March 31st.

 

73


Table of Contents
     Changes in Net Interest Income  
     One Year Horizon  
Immediate    3/31/2013     3/31/2012  

Change in the

Level of Interest

Rates

   Net
Interest Income
(000s)
     $ Change
(000s)
    % Change     Net
Interest Income
(000s)
     $ Change
(000s)
    % Change  

+ 3.00%

     232,498         (32,965     -12.42     240,702         (12,203     -4.83

+ 2.00%

     246,182         (19,282     -7.26     247,440         (5,465     -2.16

+ 1.00%

     259,813         (5,651     -2.13     254,258         1,353        0.54

Yield Curve at 3/31

              

- 1.00%

     NA         NA        NA        NA         NA        NA   

100 bp flattening of curve

              

Short end

     256,313         (9,151     -3.45     NA         NA        NA   

Long end

     261,419         (4,045     -1.52     NA         NA        NA   

100 bp steepening of curve

              

Short end

     264,508         (955     -0.36     NA         NA        NA   

Long end

     268,881         3,417        1.29     NA         NA        NA   
     Changes in Net Interest Income  
     Two Year Cumulative Horizon  
Immediate    3/31/2013     3/31/2012  

Change in the

Level of Interest

Rates

   Net
Interest Income
(000s)
     $ Change
(000s)
    % Change     Net
Interest Income
(000s)
     $ Change
(000s)
    % Change  

+ 3.00%

     481,846         (41,070     -7.85     492,322         (7,567     -1.51

+ 2.00%

     505,331         (17,586     -3.36     503,829         3,940        0.79

+ 1.00%

     524,207         1,290        0.25     511,195         11,307        2.26

Yield Curve at 3/31

              

- 1.00%

     NA         NA        NA        NA         NA        NA   

100 bp flattening of curve

              

Short end

     511,366         (11,551     -2.21     NA         NA        NA   

Long end

     510,611         (12,306     -2.35     NA         NA        NA   

100 bp steepening of curve

              

Short end

     519,489         (3,428     -0.66     NA         NA        NA   

Long end

     533,974         11,057        2.11     NA         NA        NA   

From March 31, 2012 to March 31, 2013, there were significant changes to the size and mix of the balance sheet, some of which were due to the acquisition of Indiana Community Bank on September 15, 2012. During this time, investments increased by $516.5 million and net loans increased by $461.9 million, including a $288.4 million increase in residential real estate loans. Also during this time, deposits increased by $398.5 million, including an increase of $205.3 million in non-interest bearing checking, $133.2 million in NOW, and $244.7 million in savings. On November 15, 2012, two Federal Home Loan Bank advances totaling $50 million were terminated together with the accompanying pay-floating, receive-fixed interest rate swaps. Additionally, on February 7, 2013, a $25 million Federal Home Loan Bank advance was terminated.

At March 31, 2013, our simulated exposure to an increase in interest rates shows that an immediate increase in rates of 1.00% will decrease our net interest income by $5.7 million (-2.13%) over a one year horizon compared to our base case scenario. Rate increases of 2.00% and 3.00% would cause net interest income to decline by $19.3 million (-7.26%), and $33.0 million (-12.42%) respectively. Modeling results at March 31, 2013, remain within the Company’s acceptable risk tolerance levels; however, we continue to monitor our rising rate scenarios very closely. Over a two-year horizon, the model reflects an increase in net interest income of $1.3 million (.25%) over base case, for the up 1.00%. For the up 2.00% scenario, net interest income decreases by $17.6 million (-3.36%) and, in an up 3.00% scenario, net interest income decreases $41.1 million (-7.85%) compared to our base case scenario. As a result of the already low interest rate environment, we did not include a 1.00% falling scenario.

 

74


Table of Contents

In addition to reporting our interest rate sensitivity assuming an instantaneous shift in rates of 1.00%, 2.00% and 3.00% across the interest rate curve, we have included the following modeling scenarios; short-end flattening, long-end flattening, short-end steepening, and long-end steepening. The shape of the yield curve can have a significant impact on our net interest income as the above table illustrates. A long-end flattening of the yield curve means that rates on the short-end of the curve remain stationary while long-end rates decline by 1.00%. Our modeling projects in this scenario that our net interest income would decline by $12.3 million (-2.35%) over a two year horizon. This is caused by longer term assets re-pricing at lower rates, while pricing on deposits, which are more closely tied to short-term rates, remains static. By contrast, in a long-end steepening scenario, short-term rates remain constant while rates on the long-end increase by 1.00%. In this scenario, our net interest income is projected to increase by $11.1 million (2.11%) over a two year horizon, since assets re-price at higher rates while rates on our deposits remain constant.

Old National also has longer term interest rate risk exposure, which may not be appropriately measured by Net Interest Income at Risk modeling. We use Economic Value of Equity (EVE) sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of long term cash flows on earnings and capital. EVE modeling involves discounting present values of all cash flows under different interest rate scenarios. The discounted present value of all cash flows represents our economic value of equity. The amount of base case economic value and its sensitivity to shifts in interest rates provide a measure of the longer term re-pricing and option risk in the balance sheet. EVE simulation results are shown below, relative to base case.

 

     Economic Value of Equity  
     3/31/2013     3/31/2012  

Immediate Change in

the Level of Interest

Rates

   Economic
Value of Equity
(millions)
     $ Change
(millions)
    % Change     Economic
Value of Equity
(millions)
     $ Change
(millions)
    % Change  

+ 3.00%

     685         (58     -7.83     744         (24     -3.12

+ 2.00%

     738         (4     -0.57     778         10        1.29

+ 1.00%

     789         47        6.30     820         52        6.76

Yield Curve at 3/31

              

- 1.00%

     NA         NA        NA        NA         NA        NA   

At March 31, 2013, Old National’s Economic Value of Equity (“EVE”) scenarios indicated a positive change to EVE in the up 1.00% scenario and negative changes in the 2.00%, and 3.00% scenarios. These changes in EVE modeling results were driven primarily by in the mix of the balance sheet noted above, specifically the large increase in demand and savings deposits. The value of these deposits (which are carried as liabilities) are assumed to decrease in value to a greater degree than the less rate sensitive assets on our balance sheet, under rising rate scenarios. Modeling results at March 31, 2013, indicate that we remain within our Company’s acceptable risk tolerance levels.

Because the models are driven by expected behavior in various interest rate scenarios and many factors besides market interest rates affect our net interest income and value, we recognize that model outputs are not guarantees of actual results. For this reason, we model many different combinations of interest rates and balance sheet assumptions to understand its overall sensitivity to market interest rate changes.

We use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps, as one method to manage interest rate risk in the ordinary course of business. We also provide derivatives to our commercial customers in connection with managing interest rate risk. Our derivatives had an estimated fair value gain of $6.8 million at March 31, 2013, compared to an estimated fair value gain of $6.5 million at March 31, 2012. In addition, the notional amount of derivatives decreased by $41.7 million from March 31, 2012. In November 2012, $50 million of fair value hedges were terminated. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of derivative financial instruments.

 

75


Table of Contents

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that we may not be able to satisfy current or future financial commitments, or may become unduly reliant on alternative funding sources. The Funds Management Committee of the Board of Directors establishes liquidity risk guidelines and, along with the Balance Sheet Management Committee, monitors liquidity risk. The objective of liquidity management is to ensure we have the ability to fund balance sheet growth and meet deposit and debt obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner. Management monitors liquidity through a regular review of asset and liability maturities, funding sources, and loan and deposit forecasts. We maintain strategic and contingency liquidity plans to ensure sufficient available funding to satisfy requirements for balance sheet growth, properly manage capital markets’ funding sources and to address unexpected liquidity requirements.

Loan repayments and maturing investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds. However, deposit flows, calls of investment securities and prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, the housing market, general and local economic conditions, and competition in the marketplace. We continually monitor marketplace trends to identify patterns that might improve the predictability of the timing of deposit flows or asset prepayments.

A time deposit maturity schedule for Old National Bank is shown in the following table for March 31, 2013.

Time Deposit Maturity Schedule March 31, 2013

 

Maturity Bucket

   Amount
(000s)
     Rate  

Q2 2013

   $ 165,970         0.70

Q3 2013

     284,793         2.26

Q4 2013

     132,831         1.32

2014

     288,941         1.09

2015

     138,826         2.00

2016

     121,526         3.49

2017

     24,707         1.10

2018 and beyond

     32,605         2.05

Our ability to acquire funding at competitive prices is influenced by rating agencies’ views of our credit quality, liquidity, capital and earnings. All of the rating agencies place us in an investment grade that indicates a low risk of default. For both Old National and Old National Bank:

 

   

Fitch Rating Service affirmed and withdrew its long-term and short-term ratings for both Old National Bancorp and Old National Bank on January 18, 2013, citing that ONB’s ratings are no longer relevant to Fitch’s rating coverage.

 

   

Dominion Bond Rating Services has confirmed a stable outlook as of October 12, 2012.

 

   

Moody’s Investor Service downgraded Old National Bank’s Long Term Rating from A1 to A2 and changed its outlook from Negative to Stable on November 1, 2011. Old National Bank’s Short Term Rating was unchanged.

The senior debt ratings of Old National and Old National Bank at March 31, 2013, are shown in the following table.

SENIOR DEBT RATINGS

 

     Moody’s Investor Service      Dominion Bond Rating Svc.  
     Long      Short      Long      Short  
     term      term      term      term  

Old National Bancorp

     N/A         N/A         BBB (high)         R-2 (high)   

Old National Bank

     A2         P-1         A (low)         R-1 (low)   

N/A = not applicable

 

 

76


Table of Contents

Old National Bank maintains relationships in capital markets with brokers and dealers to issue certificates of deposit and short-term and medium-term bank notes as well. As of March 31, 2013, Old National Bancorp and its subsidiaries had the following availability of liquid funds and borrowings.

 

     Parent         

(dollars in thousands)

   Company      Subsidiaries  

Available liquid funds:

     

Cash and due from banks

   $ 35,775       $ 98,164   

Unencumbered government-issued debt securities

     —            1,601,727   

Unencumbered investment grade municipal securities

     —            644,326   

Unencumbered corporate securities

     —            127,644   

Unencumbered other securities

     —            2,568   

Availability of borrowings:

     

Amount available from Federal Reserve discount window*

     —            599,922   

Amount available from Federal Home Loan Bank Indianapolis*

     —            490,428   

Amount available under other credit facilities

     —            —      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total available funds

   $ 35,775       $ 3,564,779   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

* Based on collateral pledged

The Parent Company (Old National) has routine funding requirements consisting primarily of operating expenses, dividends to shareholders, debt service, net derivative cash flows and funds used for acquisitions. The Parent Company can obtain funding to meet its obligations from dividends and management fees collected from its subsidiaries, operating line of credit and through the issuance of debt securities. Additionally, the Parent Company has a shelf registration in place with the Securities and Exchange Commission permitting ready access to the public debt and equity markets. At March 31, 2013, the Parent Company’s other borrowings outstanding were $28.0 million, a net decrease of $1.0 million from March 31, 2012. This decrease was the result of the Parent Company calling $13.0 million of subordinated debt and $3.0 million of trust preferred securities on June 30, 2012, while adding $15.0 million of Indiana Community Bancorp’s trust preferred securities on September 15, 2012.

Federal banking laws regulate the amount of dividends that may be paid by banking subsidiaries without prior approval. Prior regulatory approval is required if dividends to be declared in any year would exceed net earnings of the current year plus retained net profits for the preceding two years. Prior regulatory approval to pay dividends was not required in 2012 and is not currently required.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Off-balance sheet arrangements include commitments to extend credit and financial guarantees. Commitments to extend credit and financial guarantees are used to meet the financial needs of our customers. Our banking affiliates have entered into various agreements to extend credit, including loan commitments of $1.287 billion and standby letters of credit of $69.1 million at March 31, 2013. At March 31, 2013, approximately $1.245 billion of the loan commitments had fixed rates and $42 million had floating rates, with the floating rates ranging from 0% to 21%. At December 31, 2012, loan commitments were $1.253 billion and standby letters of credit were $63.4 million. The term of these off-balance sheet arrangements is typically one year or less.

During the second quarter of 2007, we entered into a risk participation in an interest rate swap. The interest rate swap had a notional amount of $8.3 million at March 31, 2013.

 

77


Table of Contents

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table presents our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations at March 31, 2013:

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

 

     Payments Due In         

(dollars in thousands)

   One Year
or Less (1)
     One to
Three Years
     Three to
Five Years
     Over Five
Years
     Total  

Deposits without stated maturity

   $ 5,876,120       $ —         $ —         $ —         $ 5,876,120   

IRAs, consumer and brokered certificates of deposit

     583,594         427,766         146,233         32,606         1,190,199   

Short-term borrowings

     644,021         —           —           —           644,021   

Other borrowings

     350,349         50,857         38,557         97,035         536,798   

Fixed interest payments (2)

     5,155         10,469         7,775         22,394         45,793   

Operating leases

     23,891         59,712         57,300         243,972         384,875   

Other long-term liabilities (3)

     13,580         —           —           —           13,580   

 

(1) For the remaining nine months of fiscal 2013.
(2) Our subordinated notes, certain trust preferred securities and certain Federal Home Loan Bank advances have fixed rates ranging from 0.17% to 8.34%. All of our other long-term debt is at Libor based variable rates at March 31, 2013. The projected variable interest assumes no increase in Libor rates from March 31, 2013.
(3) Old Natonal assumed Indiana Bank and Trust’s Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions. Old National has given notice to withdraw from the plan and has recorded a $13.4 million termination liability. Remainder is amount expected to be contributed to Old National pension plans in 2013. Amounts for 2014 and beyond are unknown at this time.

We rent certain premises and equipment under operating leases. See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on long-term lease arrangements.

We are party to various derivative contracts as a means to manage the balance sheet and our related exposure to changes in interest rates, to manage our residential real estate loan origination and sale activity, and to provide derivative contracts to our clients. Since the derivative liabilities recorded on the balance sheet change frequently and do not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid under these contracts, these liabilities are not included in the table of contractual obligations presented above. Further discussion of derivative instruments is included in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.

In the normal course of business, various legal actions and proceedings are pending against us and our affiliates which are incidental to the business in which they are engaged. Further discussion of contingent liabilities is included in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements.

In addition, liabilities recorded under FASB ASC 740-10 (FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109) are not included in the table because the amount and timing of any cash payments cannot be reasonably estimated. Further discussion of income taxes and liabilities recorded under FASB ASC 740-10 is included in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Certain accounting policies require management to use significant judgment and estimates, which can have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions made are based upon historical experience or other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgment and assumptions, actual results could differ from estimates, which could have a material affect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

78


Table of Contents

The following accounting policies materially affect our reported earnings and financial condition and require significant judgments and estimates. Management has reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board.

Goodwill and Intangibles

 

   

Description. For acquisitions, we are required to record the assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, and the liabilities assumed at their fair value. These often involve estimates based on third-party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques that may include estimates of attrition, inflation, asset growth rates or other relevant factors. In addition, the determination of the useful lives over which an intangible asset will be amortized is subjective. Under FASB ASC 350 (SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets), goodwill and indefinite-lived assets recorded must be reviewed for impairment on an annual basis, as well as on an interim basis if events or changes indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss must be recognized for any excess of carrying value over fair value of the goodwill or the indefinite-lived intangible asset.

 

   

Judgments and Uncertainties. The determination of fair values is based on internal valuations using management’s assumptions of future growth rates, future attrition, discount rates, multiples of earnings or other relevant factors.

 

   

Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions. Changes in these factors, as well as downturns in economic or business conditions, could have a significant adverse impact on the carrying values of goodwill or intangible assets and could result in impairment losses affecting the financials of the Company as a whole and the individual lines of business in which the goodwill or intangibles reside.

Acquired Impaired Loans

 

   

Description. Loans acquired with evidence of credit deterioration since inception and for which it is probable that all contractual payments will not be received are accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (“ASC 310-30”). These loans are recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition, with no carryover of the related allowance for loan losses. Fair value of acquired loans is determined using a discounted cash flow methodology based on assumptions about the amount and timing of principal and interest payments, principal prepayments and principal defaults and losses, and current market rates. In recording the acquisition date fair values of acquired impaired loans, management calculates a non-accretable difference (the credit component of the purchased loans) and an accretable difference (the yield component of the purchased loans).

Over the life of the acquired loans, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected on pools of loans sharing common risk characteristics, which are treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The Company evaluates at each balance sheet date whether the present value of its pools of loans determined using the effective interest rates has decreased significantly and if so, recognizes a provision for loan loss in its consolidated statement of income. For any significant increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the pool’s remaining life.

 

   

Judgments and Uncertainties. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require management to make estimates about expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are highly subjective in nature and subject to change.

 

   

Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions. Changes in these factors, as well as changing economic conditions will likely impact the carrying value of these acquired loans as well as the carrying value of any associated indemnification assets, as the FDIC will reimburse the Company for losses incurred on certain acquired loans, but the shared-loss agreements may not fully offset the financial effects of such a situation.

 

79


Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

   

Description. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable incurred losses in the consolidated loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is an estimate based on reviews of individual loans, pools of homogeneous loans, assessments of the impact of current and anticipated economic conditions on the portfolio and historical loss experience. The allowance represents management’s best estimate, but significant downturns in circumstances relating to loan quality and economic conditions could result in a requirement for additional allowance. Likewise, an upturn in loan quality and improved economic conditions may allow a reduction in the required allowance. In either instance, unanticipated changes could have a significant impact on results of operations.

The allowance is increased through a provision charged to operating expense. Uncollectible loans are charged-off through the allowance. Recoveries of loans previously charged-off are added to the allowance. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that contractual interest and principal payments will not be collected either for the amounts or by the dates as scheduled in the loan agreement. Our policy for recognizing income on impaired loans is to accrue interest unless a loan is placed on nonaccrual status. A loan is generally placed on nonaccrual status when principal or interest becomes 90 days past due unless it is well secured and in the process of collection, or earlier when concern exists as to the ultimate collectibility of principal or interest. We monitor the quality of our loan portfolio on an on-going basis and use a combination of detailed credit assessments by relationship managers and credit officers, historic loss trends, and economic and business environment factors in determining the allowance for loan losses. We record provisions for loan losses based on current loans outstanding, grade changes, mix of loans and expected losses. A detailed loan loss evaluation on an individual loan basis for our highest risk loans is performed quarterly. Management follows the progress of the economy and how it might affect our borrowers in both the near and the intermediate term. We have a formalized and disciplined independent loan review program to evaluate loan administration, credit quality and compliance with corporate loan standards. This program includes periodic reviews and regular reviews of problem loan reports, delinquencies and charge-offs.

 

   

Judgments and Uncertainties. We use migration analysis as a tool to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses for performing commercial loans. Migration analysis is a statistical technique that attempts to estimate probable losses for existing pools of loans by matching actual losses incurred on loans back to their origination. Judgment is used to select and weight the historical periods which are most representative of the current environment.

We calculate migration analysis using several different scenarios based on varying assumptions to evaluate the widest range of possible outcomes. The migration-derived historical commercial loan loss rates are applied to the current commercial loan pools to arrive at an estimate of probable losses for the loans existing at the time of analysis. The amounts determined by migration analysis are adjusted for management’s best estimate of the effects of current economic conditions, loan quality trends, results from internal and external review examinations, loan volume trends, credit concentrations and various other factors.

We use historic loss ratios adjusted for expectations of future economic conditions to determine the appropriate level of allowance for consumer and residential real estate loans.

 

   

Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions. The allowance represents management’s best estimate, but significant downturns in circumstances relating to loan quality and economic conditions could result in a requirement for additional allowance. Likewise, an upturn in loan quality and improved economic conditions may allow a reduction in the required allowance. In either instance, unanticipated changes could have a significant impact on results of operations.

 

80


Table of Contents

Management’s analysis of probable losses in the portfolio at March 31, 2013, resulted in a range for allowance for loan losses of $11.8 million. The range pertains to general (FASB ASC 310, Receivables/SFAS 5) reserves for both retail and performing commercial loans. Specific (FASB ASC 310, Receivables/SFAS 114) reserves do not have a range of probable loss. Due to the risks and uncertainty associated with the economy, our projection of FAS 5 loss rates inherent in the portfolio, and our selection of representative historical periods, we establish a range of probable outcomes (a high-end estimate and a low-end estimate) and evaluate our position within this range. The potential effect to net income based on our position in the range relative to the high and low endpoints is a decrease of $2.0 million and an increase of $5.7 million, respectively, after taking into account the tax effects. These sensitivities are hypothetical and are not intended to represent actual results.

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

   

Description. As part of our overall interest rate risk management, we use derivative instruments to reduce exposure to changes in interest rates and market prices for financial instruments. The application of the hedge accounting policy requires judgment in the assessment of hedge effectiveness, identification of similar hedged item groupings and measurement of changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments and hedged items. To the extent hedging relationships are found to be effective, as determined by FASB ASC 815 (SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities), changes in fair value of the derivatives are offset by changes in the fair value of the related hedged item or recorded to other comprehensive income. Management believes hedge effectiveness is evaluated properly in preparation of the financial statements. All of the derivative financial instruments we use have an active market and indications of fair value can be readily obtained. We are not using the “short-cut” method of accounting for any fair value derivatives.

 

   

Judgments and Uncertainties. The application of the hedge accounting policy requires judgment in the assessment of hedge effectiveness, identification of similar hedged item groupings and measurement of changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments and hedged items.

 

   

Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions. To the extent hedging relationships are found to be effective, as determined by FASB ASC 815 (SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities), changes in fair value of the derivatives are offset by changes in the fair value of the related hedged item or recorded to other comprehensive income. However, if in the future the derivative financial instruments used by us no longer qualify for hedge accounting treatment, all changes in fair value of the derivative would flow through the consolidated statements of income in other noninterest income, resulting in greater volatility in our earnings.

Income Taxes

 

   

Description. We are subject to the income tax laws of the U.S., its states and the municipalities in which we operate. These tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the relevant government taxing authorities. We review income tax expense and the carrying value of deferred tax assets quarterly; and as new information becomes available, the balances are adjusted as appropriate. FASB ASC 740-10 (FIN 48) prescribes a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not, and a measurement attribute for all tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, in order for those tax positions to be recognized in the financial statements. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further description of our provision and related income tax assets and liabilities.

 

   

Judgments and Uncertainties. In establishing a provision for income tax expense, we must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws. We must also make estimates about when in the future certain items will affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions. Disputes over interpretations of the tax laws may be subject to review/adjudication by the court systems of the various tax jurisdictions or may be settled with the taxing authority upon examination or audit.

 

81


Table of Contents
   

Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions. Although management believes that the judgments and estimates used are reasonable, actual results could differ and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. To the extent we prevail in matters for which reserves have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our reserves, our effective income tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement would result in an increase in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement would result in a reduction in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution.

Valuation of Securities

 

   

Description. The fair value of our securities is determined with reference to price estimates. In the absence of observable market inputs related to items such as cash flow assumptions or adjustments to market rates, management judgment is used. Different judgments and assumptions used in pricing could result in different estimates of value.

When the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost for an extended period, we consider whether there is an other-than-temporary-impairment in the value of the security. If, in management’s judgment, an other-than-temporary-impairment exists, the portion of the loss in value attributable to credit quality is transferred from accumulated other comprehensive loss as an immediate reduction of current earnings and the cost basis of the security is written down by this amount.

We consider the following factors when determining an other-than-temporary-impairment for a security or investment:

 

   

The length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost;

 

   

The financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;

 

   

The underlying fundamentals of the relevant market and the outlook for such market for the near future;

 

   

Our intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery; and

 

   

When applicable for purchased beneficial interests, the estimated cash flows of the securities are assessed for adverse changes.

Quarterly, securities are evaluated for other-than-temporary-impairment in accordance with FASB ASC 320 (SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities), and FASB ASC 325-10 (Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interest in Securitized Financial Assets) and FASB ASC 320-10 (FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments). An impairment that is an “other-than-temporary-impairment” is a decline in the fair value of an investment below its amortized cost attributable to factors that indicate the decline will not be recovered over the anticipated holding period of the investment. Other-than-temporary-impairments result in reducing the security’s carrying value by the amount of credit loss. The credit component of the other-than-temporary-impairment loss is realized through the statement of income and the remainder of the loss remains in other comprehensive income.

 

   

Judgments and Uncertainties. The determination of other-than-temporary-impairment is a subjective process, and different judgments and assumptions could affect the timing and amount of loss realization. In addition, significant judgments are required in determining valuation and impairment, which include making assumptions regarding the estimated prepayments, loss assumptions and interest cash flows.

 

   

Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions. Actual credit deterioration could be more or less severe than estimated. Upon subsequent review, if cash flows have significantly improved, the discount would be amortized into earnings over the remaining life of the debt security in a prospective manner based on the amount and timing of future cash flows. Additional credit deterioration resulting in an adverse change in cash flows would result in additional other-than-temporary impairment loss recorded in the income statement.

 

82


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In this report, we have made various statements regarding current expectations or forecasts of future events, which speak only as of the date the statements are made. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are also made from time-to-time in press releases and in oral statements made by the officers of Old National Bancorp (“Old National,” or the “Company”). Forward-looking statements are identified by the words “expect,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “project,” “estimate,” “believe”, “anticipate” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements also include, but are not limited to, statements regarding estimated cost savings, plans and objectives for future operations, the Company’s business and growth strategies, including future acquisitions of banks, regulatory developments, and expectations about performance as well as economic and market conditions and trends.

Such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and estimates, which although believed to be reasonable, may turn out to be incorrect. Therefore, undue reliance should not be placed upon these estimates and statements. We can not assure that any of these statements, estimates, or beliefs will be realized and actual results may differ from those contemplated in these “forward-looking statements.” We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. You are advised to consult further disclosures we may make on related subjects in our filings with the SEC. In addition to other factors discussed in this report, some of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the following:

 

 

economic, market, operational, liquidity, credit and interest rate risks associated with our business;

 

 

economic conditions generally and in the financial services industry;

 

 

expected cost savings in connection with the consolidation of recent acquisitions may not be fully realized or realized within the expected time frames, and deposit attrition, customer loss and revenue loss following completed acquisitions may be greater than expected;

 

 

unexpected difficulties and losses related to FDIC-assisted acquisitions, including those resulting from our loss-sharing arrangements with the FDIC;

 

 

increased competition in the financial services industry either nationally or regionally, resulting in, among other things, credit quality deterioration;

 

 

our ability to achieve loan and deposit growth;

 

 

volatility and direction of market interest rates;

 

 

governmental legislation and regulation, including changes in accounting regulation or standards;

 

 

our ability to execute our business plan;

 

 

a weakening of the economy which could materially impact credit quality trends and the ability to generate loans;

 

 

changes in the securities markets; and

 

 

changes in fiscal, monetary and tax policies.

Investors should consider these risks, uncertainties and other factors in addition to risk factors included in our other filings with the SEC.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Market Risk and Liquidity Risk.

 

83


Table of Contents
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Old National’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that Old National’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, are effective at the reasonable assurance level as discussed below to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Old National in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Old National’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. Management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that Old National’s disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be only reasonable assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in Old National’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Old National’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

84


Table of Contents

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s annual report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

(c) ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Period

   Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
     Average
Price
Paid Per
Share
     Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publically
Announced Plans
or Programs
     Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs
 

01/01/13—01/31/13

     —         $ —           —           2,000,000   

02/01/13—02/28/13

     34,491         13.59         34,491         1,965,509   

03/01/13—03/31/13

     52,620         13.43         52,620         1,912,889   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Quarter-to-date 03/31/13

     87,111       $ 13.49         87,111         1,912,889   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

On January 24, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 2.0 million shares of stock over a twelve month period beginning January 24, 2013 and ending January 31, 2014. During the first three months of 2013, Old National repurchased a limited number of shares associated with employee share-based incentive programs but did not repurchase any shares on the open market.

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

 

(a) None

 

(b) There have been no material changes in the procedure by which security holders recommend nominees to the Company’s board of directors.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit No.

  

Description

2.1    Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated November 24, 2008 by and among Old National Bancorp, Old National Bank and RBS Citizens, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 25, 2008) and amended on March 20, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2009).
2.2    Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 5, 2010 by and among Old National Bancorp and Monroe Bancorp (the schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b) (2) of Regulation S-K) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 6, 2010).
2.3    Purchase and Assumption Agreement Whole Bank All Deposits, among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, receiver of Integra Bank National Association, Evansville, Indiana, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Old National Bank, dated July 29, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2011).

 

85


Table of Contents
2.4    Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 24, 2012 by and between Old National Bancorp and Indiana Community Bancorp (the schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 25, 2012).
2.5    First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 28, 2012 by and between Old National Bancorp and Indiana Community Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2012).
2.6    Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated as of January 8, 2013 by and between Old National Bancorp and Bank of America, National Association (the schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 9, 2013).
3.1    Articles of Incorporation of Old National, amended December 10, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).
3.2    By-Laws of Old National, amended July 23, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
4.1    Senior Indenture between Old National and The Bank of New York Trust Company (as successor to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (as successor to Bank One, NA)), as trustee, dated as of July 23, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Old National’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-118374, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 2, 2004).
4.2    Form of Indenture between Old National and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (as successor to Bank One, NA), as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Old National’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-87573, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 1999).
4.3    First Indenture Supplement dated as of May 20, 2005, between Old National and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, as trustee, providing for the issuance of its 5.00% Senior Notes due 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2005).
4.4    Form of 5.00% Senior Notes due 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Old National’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2005).
10.1    Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Old National Bancorp and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of Old National’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*
10.2    Second Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Old National Bancorp and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*
10.3    2005 Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (Effective as of January 1, 2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*
10.4    Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan for Select Executive Employees of Old National Bancorp and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*

 

86


Table of Contents
10.5    Second Amendment to the Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan for Select Executive Employees of Old National Bancorp and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*
10.6    Third Amendment to the Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan for Select Executive Employees of Old National Bancorp and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*
10.7    2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (Effective as of January 1, 2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*
10.8    Summary of Old National Bancorp’s Outside Director Compensation Program (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003).*
10.9    Form of Executive Stock Option Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) of Old National’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).*
10.10    Form of 2006 “Performance-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2006).*
10.11    Form of 2006 “Service-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2006).*
10.12    Form of 2006 Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2006).*
10.13    Form of 2007 “Performance-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).*
10.14    Form of 2007 “Service-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(x) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).*
10.15    Form of 2007 Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(y) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).*
10.16    Lease Agreement, dated December 20, 2006 between ONB One Main Landlord, LLC and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(aa) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).
10.17    Lease Agreement, dated December 20, 2006 between ONB 123 Main Landlord, LLC and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ab) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).

 

87


Table of Contents
10.18    Lease Agreement, dated December 20, 2006 between ONB 4th Street Landlord, LLC and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ac) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).
10.19    Master Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #1, LLC, and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).
10.20    Lease Supplement No. 1 dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #1, LLC, Old National Bank and ONB Insurance Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).
10.21    Master Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #2, LLC, and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).
10.22    Master Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #3, LLC, and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).
10.23    Master Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #4, LLC, and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).
10.24    Master Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #5, LLC, and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.7 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).
10.25    Form of Lease Agreement dated October 19, 2007 entered into by affiliates of Old National Bancorp and affiliates of SunTrust Equity Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2007).
10.26    Form of Lease Agreement dated December 27, 2007 entered into by affiliates of Old National Bancorp and affiliates of SunTrust Equity Funding, LLC (as incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 31, 2007).
10.27    Form of 2008 Non-qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2008).*
10.28    Form of 2008 “Performance-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2008).*
10.29    Form of 2008 “Service-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2008).*
10.30    Old National Bancorp 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix II of Old National’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2008).*

 

88


Table of Contents
10.31    Old National Bancorp Code of Conduct (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29, 2008).
10.32    Letter Agreement dated December 12, 2008 by and between Old National Bancorp and the United States Department of Treasury which includes the Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2008).
10.33    Form of 2009 Performance Share Award Agreement – Internal Performance Measures between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2009).*
10.34    Form of 2009 Performance Share Award Agreement – Relative Performance Measures between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2009).*
10.35    Form of 2009 “Service-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2009).*
10.36    Form of 2009 Executive Stock Option Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2009).*
10.37    Preferred Stock Repurchase Agreement dated March 31, 2009 by and between Old National Bancorp and the United States Department of Treasury (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2009).
10.38    Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-161394 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 17, 2009).
10.39    Purchase Agreement dated September 17, 2009 between National City Commercial Capital Company, LLC, Old National Bank and Indiana Old National Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2009).
10.40    Servicing Agreement dated September 17, 2009 between National City Commercial Capital Company, LLC, Old National Bank and Indiana Old National Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2009).
10.41    Form of 2010 Performance Share Award Agreement – Internal Performance Measures between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(as) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).*
10.42    Form of 2010 Performance Share Award Agreement – Relative Performance Measures between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(at) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).*
10.43    Form of 2010 “Service Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(au) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).*
10.44    Voting agreement by and among directors of Monroe Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 6, 2010).*

 

89


Table of Contents
10.45    Form of Employment Agreement for Robert G. Jones (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2011).*
10.46    Form of Employment Agreement for Barbara A Murphy, Christopher A. Wolking, Allen R. Mounts and Daryl D. Moore (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2011).*
10.47    Form of 2011 Performance Share Award Agreement – Internal Performance Measures between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(av) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).*
10.48    Form of 2011 Performance Share Award Agreement – Relative Performance Measures between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(aw) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).*
10.49    Form of 2011 “Service Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ax) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).*
10.50    Old National Bank Cash-Settled Value Appreciation Instrument, dated July 29, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2011).
10.51    Old National Bancorp 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 of Old National’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011).*
10.52    Voting agreement by and among directors of Indiana Community Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ba) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).*
10.53    Form of Amended Severance/Change of Control Agreement for Jeffrey L. Knight (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(bb) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).*
10.54    Form of 2012 Performance Share Award Agreement – Internal Performance Measures between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(bc) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).*
10.55    Form of 2012 Performance Share Award Agreement – Relative Performance Measures between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(bd) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).*
10.56    Form of 2012 “Service Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(be) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).*
10.57    Old National Bancorp Amended and Restated 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix I of Old National’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2012).*
10.58    Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-183344 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2012).
10.59    Form of 2013 Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(bg) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).*

 

90


Table of Contents
10.60    Form of 2013 Performance Share Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(bh) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.)*
31.1    Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2    Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1    Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2    Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101    The following materials from Old National Bancorp’s Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.**

 

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
** Furnished, not filed

 

91


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

(Registrant)

By:

 

/s/ Christopher A. Wolking

 

Christopher A. Wolking

Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer

  Date: May 3, 2013

 

92