Edgar Filing: Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.

sho-Current Folio_10Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-32319

Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


Maryland		20-1296886
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

120 Vantis, Suite 350 Aliso Viejo, California		92656
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 330-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ☒		Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☐		Smaller reporting company ☐
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company ◻

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

225,321,660 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, as of October 31, 2017

Table of Contents

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	2

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016	2

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016	3

	Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017	4

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016	5

	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	46

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	46

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	47

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	47

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	47

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	47

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	47

Item 5.	Other Information	47

Item 6.	Exhibits	48

SIGNATURES		49

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.Financial Statements

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)



	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	466,519	$	369,537
Restricted cash		71,546		67,923
Accounts receivable, net		44,838		39,337
Inventories		1,236		1,225
Prepaid expenses		10,518		10,489
Assets held for sale, net		—		79,113
Total current assets		594,657		567,624
Investment in hotel properties, net		3,235,053		3,158,219
Deferred financing fees, net		1,566		4,002
Other assets, net		23,221		9,389
Total assets	$	3,854,497	$	3,739,234
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	30,730	$	36,110
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		23,020		24,896
Dividends and distributions payable		14,474		119,847
Other current liabilities		47,601		39,869
Current portion of notes payable, net		9,161		184,929
Liabilities of assets held for sale		—		3,153
Total current liabilities		124,986		408,804
Notes payable, less current portion, net		977,634		746,374
Capital lease obligations, less current portion		26,756		15,574
Other liabilities		29,774		36,650
Total liabilities		1,159,150		1,207,402
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Equity:
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized:
6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 4,600,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, stated at liquidation preference of $25.00 per share		115,000		115,000
6.45% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 3,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, stated at liquidation preference of $25.00 per share		75,000		75,000
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 225,321,660 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and 220,073,140 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016		2,253		2,201
Additional paid in capital		2,677,251		2,596,620
Retained earnings		912,881		786,901
Cumulative dividends and distributions		(1,136,119)		(1,092,952)
Total stockholders’ equity		2,646,266		2,482,770
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint venture		49,081		49,062
Total equity		2,695,347		2,531,832
Total liabilities and equity	$	3,854,497	$	3,739,234

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
REVENUES
Room	$	215,768	$	217,672	$	629,788	$	629,145
Food and beverage		68,821		68,899		222,943		221,431
Other operating		19,320		16,733		50,717		49,180
Total revenues		303,909		303,304		903,448		899,756
OPERATING EXPENSES
Room		54,433		54,624		160,282		160,185
Food and beverage		49,262		49,174		150,768		154,042
Other operating		4,256		4,328		12,120		12,516
Advertising and promotion		14,953		15,015		44,810		45,285
Repairs and maintenance		12,882		10,876		34,645		33,139
Utilities		8,331		8,252		22,844		23,114
Franchise costs		9,431		9,408		27,367		27,402
Property tax, ground lease and insurance		21,399		20,944		63,477		61,941
Other property-level expenses		34,511		35,003		105,015		107,698
Corporate overhead		7,233		6,392		21,585		19,918
Depreciation and amortization		39,719		40,442		120,051		121,169
Impairment loss		34,427		—		34,427		—
Total operating expenses		290,837		254,458		797,391		766,409
Operating income		13,072		48,846		106,057		133,347
Interest and other income		1,027		283		2,597		1,127
Interest expense		(17,008)		(11,136)		(41,341)		(47,018)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—		—		(4)		(259)
Gain on sale of assets		—		—		45,474		18,223
(Loss) income before income taxes and discontinued operations		(2,909)		37,993		112,783		105,420
Income tax benefit		12,991		1,434		12,541		959
Income from continuing operations		10,082		39,427		125,324		106,379
Income from discontinued operations		7,000		—		7,000		—
NET INCOME		17,082		39,427		132,324		106,379
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(2,169)		(2,053)		(6,344)		(5,358)
Preferred stock dividends and redemption charge		(3,208)		(3,207)		(9,622)		(12,756)
INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	11,705	$	34,167	$	116,358	$	88,265

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	17,082	$	39,427	$	132,324	$	106,379
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	11,705	$	34,167	$	116,358	$	88,265
Basic and diluted per share amounts:
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders	$	0.02	$	0.16	$	0.49	$	0.41
Income from discontinued operations		0.03		—		0.03		—
Basic and diluted income attributable to common stockholders per common share	$	0.05	$	0.16	$	0.52	$	0.41
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		224,142		215,413		221,140		214,565

Distributions declared per common share	$	0.05	$	0.05	$	0.15	$	0.15

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

(In thousands, except share data)


	Preferred Stock															Noncontrolling
	Series E			Series F			Common Stock							Cumulative		Interest in
	Number of			Number of			Number of			Additional		Retained		Dividends and		Consolidated
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Paid in Capital		Earnings		Distributions		Joint Venture		Total
Balance at December 31, 2016 (audited)	4,600,000	$	115,000	3,000,000	$	75,000	220,073,140	$	2,201	$	2,596,620	$	786,901	$	(1,092,952)	$	49,062	$	2,531,832
Net proceeds from sale of common stock	—		—	—		—	4,876,855		48		77,884		—		—		—		77,932
Deferred stock compensation, net	—		—	—		—	371,665		4		2,747		—		—		—		2,751
Common stock distributions and distributions payable at $0.15 per share year to date	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		(33,545)		—		(33,545)
Series E preferred stock dividends and dividends payable at $1.303125 per share year to date	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		(5,994)		—		(5,994)
Series F preferred stock dividends and dividends payable at $1.209375 per share year to date	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		(3,628)		—		(3,628)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		(6,325)		(6,325)
Net income	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		125,980		—		6,344		132,324
Balance at September 30, 2017	4,600,000	$	115,000	3,000,000	$	75,000	225,321,660	$	2,253	$	2,677,251	$	912,881	$	(1,136,119)	$	49,081	$	2,695,347

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)



	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	132,324	$	106,379
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Bad debt expense		503		493
Gain on sale of assets, net		(52,736)		(18,226)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		4		259
Noncash interest on derivatives and capital lease obligations, net		4,883		7,810
Depreciation		118,069		118,764
Amortization of franchise fees and other intangibles		2,386		2,936
Amortization of deferred financing fees		1,734		1,648
Amortization of deferred stock compensation		6,188		5,616
Impairment loss		34,427		—
Hurricane-related loss		201		—
Deferred income taxes		(13,628)		—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		3,873		17,846
Accounts receivable		(5,541)		(14,747)
Inventories		71		26
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(13)		(72)
Accounts payable and other liabilities		4,387		3,002
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		(2,883)		(3,215)
Net cash provided by operating activities		234,249		228,519
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sales of assets		150,171		41,202
Restricted cash — replacement reserve		(7,496)		(8,914)
Acquisition of hotel property and other assets		(173,917)		(2,447)
Renovations and additions to hotel properties		(81,470)		(139,846)
Payment for interest rate derivative		(19)		—
Net cash used in investing activities		(112,731)		(110,005)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings		—		190,000
Payment of preferred stock offering costs		—		(6,640)
Redemption of preferred stock		—		(115,000)
Proceeds from common stock offerings		79,407		—
Payment of common stock offering costs		(1,475)		—
Repurchase of common stock for employee withholding obligations		(3,793)		(2,641)
Proceeds from notes payable		240,000		100,000
Payments on notes payable		(183,796)		(196,504)
Payments of costs related to extinguishment of notes payable		(1)		(153)
Payments of deferred financing costs		(13)		(85)
Dividends and distributions paid		(148,540)		(213,453)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest		(6,325)		(5,988)
Net cash used in financing activities		(24,536)		(250,464)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		96,982		(131,950)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		369,537		499,067
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	466,519	$	367,117
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest	$	32,587	$	37,545
Cash paid for income taxes, net	$	864	$	1,103
NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITY
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable related to renovations and additions to hotel properties and other assets	$	(5,891)	$	7,165
Amortization of deferred stock compensation — construction activities	$	356	$	450
NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITY
Preferred stock redemption charge	$	—	$	4,052
Issuance of common stock distributions	$	—	$	78,823
Dividends and distributions payable	$	14,474	$	14,033

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Description of Business

Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Maryland on June 28, 2004 in anticipation of an initial public offering of common stock, which was consummated on October 26, 2004. The Company, through its 100% controlling interest in Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (the “Operating Partnership”), of which the Company is the sole managing member, and the subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, including Sunstone Hotel TRS Lessee, Inc. (the “TRS Lessee”) and its subsidiaries, is currently engaged in acquiring, owning, asset managing and renovating hotel properties. The Company may also sell certain hotel properties from time to time. The Company operates as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.

As a REIT, certain tax laws limit the amount of “non-qualifying” income the Company can earn, including income derived directly from the operation of hotels. The Company leases all of its hotels to its TRS Lessee, which in turn enters into long-term management agreements with third parties to manage the operations of the Company’s hotels, in transactions that are intended to generate qualifying income. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had interests in 27 hotels (the “27 hotels”), and the Company’s third-party managers included the following:



		Number of Hotels
Subsidiaries of Marriott International, Inc. or Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. (collectively, “Marriott”)		11
Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc.		4
Highgate Hotels L.P. and an affiliate		3
Crestline Hotels & Resorts		2
Hilton Worldwide		2
Hyatt Corporation		2
Davidson Hotels & Resorts		1
HEI Hotels & Resorts		1
Singh Hospitality, LLC		1

Total hotels held for investment		27

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the TRS Lessee and their subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. If the Company determines that it has an interest in a variable interest entity within the meaning of the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), the Company will consolidate the entity when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the entity. Based on its review, the Company determined that all of its subsidiaries were properly consolidated as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Noncontrolling interest at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represents the outside 25.0% equity interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, which the Company includes in its financial statements on a consolidated basis.

The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the Company’s opinion, the interim financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary to fairly present the interim financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2017.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Earnings Per Share

The Company applies the two-class method when computing its earnings per share. As required by the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, the net income per share for each class of stock (common stock and convertible preferred stock) is calculated assuming all of the Company’s net income is distributed as dividends to each class of stock based on their contractual rights. To the extent the Company has undistributed earnings in any calendar quarter, the Company will follow the two-class method of computing earnings per share.

The Company follows the requirements of the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are considered participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.

In accordance with the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, basic earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period, plus potential common shares considered outstanding during the period, as long as the inclusion of such awards is not anti-dilutive. Potential common shares consist of unvested restricted stock awards and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, using the more dilutive of either the two-class method or the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2017		September 30, 2016		September 30, 2017		September 30, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Numerator:
Net income	$	17,082	$	39,427	$	132,324	$	106,379
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(2,169)		(2,053)		(6,344)		(5,358)
Preferred stock dividends and redemption charge		(3,208)		(3,207)		(9,622)		(12,756)
Distributions paid on unvested restricted stock compensation		(59)		(55)		(179)		(173)
Undistributed income allocated to unvested restricted stock compensation		(2)		(123)		(440)		(293)
Numerator for basic and diluted income attributable to common stockholders	$	11,644	$	33,989	$	115,739	$	87,799
Denominator:
Weighted average basic and diluted common shares outstanding		224,142		215,413		221,140		214,565
Basic and diluted income attributable to common stockholders per common share	$	0.05	$	0.16	$	0.52	$	0.41

The Company’s unvested restricted shares associated with its long-term incentive plan and shares associated with common stock options have been excluded from the above calculation of earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU No. 2014-09”). The core principle of ASU No. 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in

Table of Contents

exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity will need to apply a five-step model: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU No. 2014-09 was originally to be effective during the first quarter of 2017; however, the FASB issued a one-year deferral so that it now becomes effective during the first quarter of 2018. ASU No. 2014-09 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

In March 2016, the FASB clarified the principal versus agent guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (“ASU No. 2016-08”). In particular, ASU No. 2016-08 clarifies how an entity should identify the unit of accounting for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements, such as service transactions by explaining what a principal controls before the specified good or service is transferred to the customer. In addition, ASU No. 2016-08 reframes the indicators to focus on evidence that an entity is acting as a principal rather than as an agent. ASU No. 2016-08 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-08 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

In May 2016, the FASB amended ASU No. 2014-09’s guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU No. 2016-12”). The amendments clarify that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all (or substantially all) of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. This clarification is important because entities that use the modified retrospective transition approach need to apply the standard only to contracts that are not complete as of the date of initial application, and entities that use the full retrospective approach may apply certain practical expedients to completed contracts. In addition, ASU No. 2016-12 clarifies that an entity should consider the probability of collecting substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for goods and services expected to be transferred to the customer rather than the total amount promised for all the goods or services in the contract. ASU No. 2016-12 also clarifies that an entity may consider its ability to manage its exposure to credit risk as part of the collectability assessment, as well as that the fair value of noncash consideration should be measured at contract inception when determining the transaction price. Finally, ASU No. 2016-12 allows an entity to make an accounting policy election to exclude from the transaction price certain types of taxes collected from a customer if it discloses that policy. ASU No. 2016-12 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-12 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2014-09, along with the related clarifications and amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 and ASU No. 2016-12, will have on its recognition of revenue included in its consolidated financial statements. While the Company is still evaluating the impact that the ASUs will have on accounting for the gain recognized upon the sale of a hotel, there is a possibility that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will affect the timing of any gain recognition in the consolidated financial statements. For example, under current guidance, a gain on the sale of hotel properties with contingencies and some future involvement is deferred until all contingencies have been removed. Under the new guidance, however, the entire gain on sale may be recognized upon the close of escrow. The Company expects to adopt the new ASUs under the modified retrospective approach.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which will require lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to today’s accounting. The guidance also eliminates today’s real estate-specific provisions and changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease executory costs for all entities. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Classification will continue to affect amounts that lessors record on the balance sheet. ASU No. 2016-02 will become effective during the first quarter of 2019, and will require a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is creating an inventory of its leases and is analyzing its current ground lease obligations. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements, and, other than the inclusion of operating leases on the Company’s balance sheet, such effects have not yet been determined.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU No. 2016-13”), which will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. In addition, entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. ASU No. 2016-13 will

Table of Contents

become effective during the first quarter of 2020. ASU No. 2016-13 will require a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted during the first quarter of 2019. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-15”), which clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 addresses certain issues where diversity in practice was identified. It amends existing guidance, which is principles based and often requires judgment to determine the appropriate classification of cash flows as operating, investing or financing activities. In addition, ASU No. 2016-15 clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 will become effective during the first quarter of 2018, and will generally require a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-18”), which will require entities to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet, the new guidance requires a reconciliation of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related caption in the balance sheet. This reconciliation can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or in the notes to the financial statements. ASU No. 2016-18 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and will require a retrospective approach. Early adoption in an interim period is permitted, but any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. Upon adoption of this standard, amounts included in restricted cash on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets will be included with cash and cash equivalents on its consolidated statements of cash flows. These amounts totaled $71.5 million and $67.9 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The adoption of this standard will not change the Company’s balance sheet presentation.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU No. 2017-01”), which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. Under the new guidance, an entity first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. If it is not met, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. ASU No. 2017-01 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Once adopted, the Company will be required to analyze future hotel acquisitions to determine if the transaction qualifies as the purchase of a business or an asset. Transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions will be capitalized, while the same costs associated with a business combination will continue to be expensed as incurred. In addition, asset acquisitions will not be subject to a measurement period, as are business combinations. Depending on the Company’s conclusion, ASU No. 2017-01 may have an effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU No. 2017-04”), which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of today’s goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will still be able to perform today’s optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before determining whether to proceed to Step 1. ASU No. 2017-04 will become effective in the first quarter of 2019, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2017-04 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting” (“ASU No. 2017-09”), which clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. The new guidance will allow companies to make certain changes to awards without accounting for them as modifications, but it does not change the accounting for modifications. Under ASU No. 2017-09, an entity will not apply modification accounting to a share-based payment award if all of the following are the same immediately before and after the change: the award’s fair value (or calculated or intrinsic value, if those measurement methods are used); the award’s vesting conditions; and the award’s classification as an equity or liability instrument. ASU No. 2017-09 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2017-09 will have an impact on its consolidated financial statements unless it changes the terms or conditions of its grants in the future.

Table of Contents

Noncontrolling Interest

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include an entity in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Such noncontrolling interest is reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from the less-than-wholly owned subsidiary is reported at the consolidated amount, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and the noncontrolling interest. Income or loss is allocated to the noncontrolling interest based on its weighted average ownership percentage for the applicable period. The consolidated statement of equity includes beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for each component of stockholders’ equity, noncontrolling interest and total equity.

At both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the noncontrolling interest reported in the Company’s financial statements included the 25.0% outside ownership in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.

Property and Equipment

The Company follows the requirements of the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the FASB ASC, which requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets to be held and used by the Company when indicators of impairment are present and the future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the related assets are adjusted to their estimated fair value and an impairment is recognized. The impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. In computing fair value, the Company uses a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of its hotel properties, taking into account each property’s expected cash flow from operations and estimated proceeds from the disposition of the property. The factors addressed in determining estimated proceeds from disposition include anticipated operating cash flow in the year of disposition and terminal capitalization rate.

Segment Reporting

The Company considers each of its hotels to be an operating segment, none of which meets the threshold for a separate reportable segment in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the FASB ASC. Currently, the Company operates in one segment, hotel ownership.

3. Investment in Hotel Properties

Investment in hotel properties, net consisted of the following (in thousands):



	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Land	$	623,493	$	531,660
Buildings and improvements		3,195,726		3,135,806
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		502,775		512,372
Intangible assets		48,560		49,015
Franchise fees		980		1,021
Construction in process		39,481		65,449
Investment in hotel properties, gross		4,411,015		4,295,323
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1,175,962)		(1,137,104)
Investment in hotel properties, net	$	3,235,053	$	3,158,219

In July 2017, the Company purchased the newly-developed 175-room Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina in Key West, Florida for a net purchase price of $173.9 million, including prorations. The purchase of the hotel included a marina, wet and dry boat slips and other customary marina amenities. The Company recorded the acquisition at fair value using an independent third-party analysis, with the purchase price allocated to investment in hotel properties and hotel working capital assets. The Company recognized acquisition related costs of $0.4 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, which are included in corporate overhead on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The results of operations for the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina have been included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income from the acquisition date of July 25, 2017 through the third quarter ended September 30, 2017.

Table of Contents

The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina’s acquisition date were allocated as follows (in thousands):


Assets:
Investment in hotel properties	$	174,971
Accounts receivable		15
Inventories		50
Prepaid expenses		41
Other assets		84
Total assets acquired		175,161

Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		210
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		256
Other current liabilities		752
Other liabilities		26
Total liabilities assumed		1,244

Total cash paid for acquisition	$	173,917

Investment in hotel properties was allocated to land ($92.5 million), buildings and improvements ($74.4 million), furniture, fixtures and equipment ($6.4 million), and intangibles ($1.7 million) related to air rights and in-place lease agreements. The air rights have a value of $1.6 million and an indefinite life. The in-place lease agreements, which are related to the wet and dry boat slips, have a value of $0.1 million and a weighted average life of nine months.

Acquired properties are included in the Company’s results of operations from the date of acquisition. The following unaudited pro forma results of operations reflect the Company’s results as if the acquisition of the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina had occurred on January 1, 2017. The information is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred, nor does it indicate future operating results. Since the newly-developed hotel opened mid-January 2017, the year-to-date results are slightly less than a full nine months, and there are no prior year results. In the Company’s opinion, all significant adjustments necessary to reflect the effects of the acquisition have been made (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2017		September 30, 2017
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Revenues	$	305,052	$	912,697
Income attributable to common stockholders	$	12,083	$	117,751
Income per diluted share attributable to common stockholders	$	0.02	$	0.50

For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company has included $1.8 million of revenue and a net loss of $1.2 million, which includes $0.7 million in hurricane-related restoration expenses, in its consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income related to the Company’s acquisition of the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina.

During the third quarter of 2017, four of the Company’s 27 hotels were impacted to varying degrees by Hurricanes Harvey and Irma: the Hilton North Houston; the Marriott Houston; the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina; and the Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®. For more information regarding the impact of the hurricanes on the Company’s hotels, please see the Hurricanes Harvey and Irma discussion in Note 11.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, combined with continued operational declines due to weakness in the Houston market, and in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company identified indicators of impairment and reviewed its Houston hotels for possible impairment. During the third quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a total impairment charge of $34.4 million, including $27.1 million for the Hilton North Houston and $7.3 million for the Marriott Houston, which is included in impairment loss on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 (see Note 5). No impairment was necessary for either the three or nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Table of Contents

4. Disposals and Discontinued Operations

Disposals

In June 2017, the Company sold the 199-room Marriott Park City located in Park City, Utah for net proceeds of $27.0 million. The Company recognized a net gain on the sale of $1.2 million. The sale did not represent a strategic shift that had a major impact on the Company’s business plan or its primary markets, and therefore, the sale of the hotel did not qualify as a discontinued operation.

In February 2017, the Company sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach located in Newport Beach, California for net proceeds of $122.8 million. The Company recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. The sale did not represent a strategic shift that had a major impact on the Company’s business plan or its primary markets, and therefore, the sale of the hotel did not qualify as a discontinued operation. The Company classified the assets and liabilities of the Fairmont Newport Beach as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 as follows (in thousands):


	December 31,
	2016
Accounts receivable, net	$	452
Inventories		126
Prepaid expenses		386
Investment in hotel property, net		77,971
Other assets, net		178
Assets held for sale, net	$	79,113

Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	781
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		751
Other current liabilities		1,473
Other liabilities		148
Liabilities of assets held for sale	$	3,153

The following table provides summary results of operations for the Marriott Park City and the Fairmont Newport Beach, as well as the Sheraton Cerritos that was sold during 2016, all of which are included in continuing operations (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Revenues	$	—	$	11,210	$	9,980	$	38,650
Income before income taxes	$	—	$	1,332	$	2,466	$	4,981
Gain on sale of assets	$	—	$	—	$	45,474	$	18,223

Discontinued Operations

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company recognized an additional $7.0 million gain related to its 2013 sale of four hotels and a laundry facility located in Rochester, Minnesota (the “Rochester Portfolio”). Upon sale of the Rochester Portfolio in 2013, the Company retained a liability not to exceed $14.0 million. The recognition of the $14.0 million liability reduced the Company’s gain on the sale of the Rochester Portfolio. In the second quarter of 2014, the Company was released from $7.0 million of its liability, and the Company recorded additional gain on the sale, which was included in discontinued operations. During the third quarter of 2017, the Company determined that its remaining obligation for the liability was remote based on the requirements of the Contingencies Topic of the FASB ASC. As such, the Company reversed the remaining $7.0 million, and recorded additional gain on the sale of the Rochester Portfolio of $7.0 million, which is included in discontinued operations for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

5. Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the carrying amount of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Table of Contents

The Company follows the requirements of the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Topic of the FASB ASC, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and disclosing fair value measurements by establishing a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:


Level 1	Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2	Inputs reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or the liability; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3	Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the only financial instruments that the Company measures at fair value on recurring bases are its interest rate derivatives, along with a life insurance policy and a related retirement benefit agreement. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company estimates the fair value of its interest rate derivatives using Level 2 measurements based on quotes obtained from the counterparties, which are based upon the consideration that would be required to terminate the agreements. Both the life insurance policy and the related retirement benefit agreement, which are for a former Company associate, are valued using Level 2 measurements.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, combined with continued operational declines due to weakness in the Houston market, and in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company identified indicators of impairment and reviewed both of its Houston hotels for possible impairment. Using Level 3 measurements, including each hotel’s undiscounted cash flow, which took into account each hotel’s expected cash flow from operations, anticipated holding period and estimated proceeds from disposition, the Company determined that neither hotel’s carrying value was fully recoverable. As such, during the third quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a total impairment charge of $34.4 million, including $27.1 million for the Hilton North Houston and $7.3 million for the Marriott Houston, which is included in impairment loss on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):


			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

September 30, 2017 (unaudited):
Houston hotels, net (1)	$	37,912	$	—	$	—	$	37,912
Interest rate cap derivative		—		—		—		—
Interest rate swap derivatives		1,463		—		1,463		—
Life insurance policy (2)		649		—		649		—
Total assets measured at fair value at September 30, 2017	$	40,024	$	—	$	2,112	$	37,912
December 31, 2016:
Interest rate cap derivative	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest rate swap derivatives		1,749		—		1,749		—
Life insurance policy (2)		861		—		861		—
Total assets measured at fair value at December 31, 2016	$	2,610	$	—	$	2,610	$	—

(1)

Includes the total fair market value of the Houston hotels, net of accumulated depreciation. The hotels are included in investment in hotel properties, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(2)

Includes the split life insurance policy for a former Company associate. These amounts are included in other assets, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and will be used to reimburse the Company for payments made to the former associate from the related retirement benefit agreement, which is included in accrued payroll and employee benefits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):


			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

September 30, 2017 (unaudited):
Retirement benefit agreement (1)	$	649	$	—	$	649	$	—
Total liabilities measured at fair value at September 30, 2017	$	649	$	—	$	649	$	—

December 31, 2016:
Retirement benefit agreement (1)	$	861	$	—	$	861	$	—
Total liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2016	$	861	$	—	$	861	$	—

(1)

Includes the retirement benefit agreement for a former Company associate. The agreement calls for the balance of the retirement benefit to be paid out to the former associate in ten annual installments, beginning in 2011. As such, the Company has paid the former associate a total of $1.4 million through September 30, 2017, which was reimbursed to the Company using funds from the related split life insurance policy noted above. These amounts are included in accrued payroll and employee benefits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Interest Rate Derivatives

The Company’s interest rate derivatives, which are not designated as effective cash flow hedges, consisted of the following at September 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):


									Estimated Fair Value Asset
		Strike / Capped			Effective	Maturity	Notional		September 30,		December 31,
Hedged Debt	Type	Rate		Index	Date	Date	Amount		2017		2016
Hilton San Diego Bayfront (1)	Cap	4.250	%	1-Month LIBOR	April 15, 2015	May 1, 2017	$	N/A	$	N/A	$	—
Hilton San Diego Bayfront (1)	Cap	4.250	%	1-Month LIBOR	May 1, 2017	May 1, 2019	$	110,096		—		N/A
$85.0 million term loan (2)	Swap	3.391	%	1-Month LIBOR	October 29, 2015	September 2, 2022	$	85,000		1,165		1,336
$100.0 million term loan (3)	Swap	3.653	%	1-Month LIBOR	January 29, 2016	January 31, 2023	$	100,000		298		413
									$	1,463	$	1,749

(1)

In March 2017, the Company purchased a new interest rate cap agreement for $19,000 related to the loan secured by the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. The new agreement, whose terms are substantially the same as the terms under the expiring cap agreement, effectively replaced the expiring agreement on May 1, 2017. The fair values of both Hilton San Diego Bayfront cap agreements are included in other assets, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(2)

The fair value of the $85.0 million term loan swap agreement is included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The 1-month LIBOR rate was swapped to a fixed rate of 1.591%.

(3)

The fair value of the $100.0 million term loan swap agreement is included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The 1-month LIBOR rate was swapped to a fixed rate of 1.853%.

Noncash changes in the fair values of the Company’s interest rate derivatives resulted in (decreases) increases to interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Noncash interest on derivatives	$	(44)	$	(1,374)	$	305	$	7,810

Table of Contents

Fair Value of Debt

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 77.8% and 76.2%, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding debt had fixed interest rates, including the effects of interest rate swap agreements. The Company uses Level 3 measurements to estimate the fair value of its debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates. The Company’s principal balances and fair market values of its consolidated debt as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Principal Balance (1)		Fair Value		Principal Balance (1)		Fair Value
Debt	$	992,149	$	1,001,088	$	935,944	$	930,665

(1)

The principal balance of debt is presented before any unamortized deferred financing fees.

6. Other Assets

Other assets, net consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Property and equipment, net	$	515	$	779
Goodwill		990		990
Deferred expense on straight-lined third-party tenant leases		2,852		2,876
Deferred income tax asset		13,977		—
Interest rate derivatives		1,463		1,749
Other receivables		2,012		1,673
Other		1,412		1,322
Total other assets net	$	23,221	$	9,389

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company released its full valuation allowance, which was previously held against all $13.6 million of its net U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets, consisting of a $14.0 million deferred tax asset related to federal and state net operating losses, reserves and other deferred tax assets of the TRS Lessee and a $0.3 million deferred tax liability related to timing differences associated with amortization and deferred revenue of the TRS Lessee. The Company’s evaluation through September 30, 2017 indicates that the hotel industry’s overall economic climate will remain relatively stable, resulting in the TRS operating leases to continue to perform as expected. As such, the Company has modified its conclusion as of December 31, 2016, and believes that there no longer exists sufficient negative evidence that would prevent it from relying on projections of future taxable income sufficient to realize its deferred assets. In reaching its conclusion, the Company has considered various factors, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax planning strategies in determining a valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets. The Company believes it is more likely than not that it will be able to realize the net U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets in the future.

Table of Contents

7. Notes Payable

Notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Notes payable requiring payments of interest and principal, with fixed rates ranging from 4.12% to 5.95%; maturing at dates ranging from November 2020 through January 2025. The notes are collateralized by first deeds of trust on four hotel properties at September 30, 2017, and five hotel properties at December 31, 2016.	$	347,233	$	528,604
Note payable requiring payments of interest and principal, bearing a blended rate of one-month LIBOR plus 225 basis points; maturing in August 2019. The note is collateralized by a first deed of trust on one hotel property.		219,916		222,340
Unsecured term loan requiring payments of interest only, with a blended interest rate based on a pricing grid with a range of 180 to 255 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the Company's leverage ratios. LIBOR has been swapped to a fixed rate of 1.591%, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.391% based on the Company's current leverage. Matures in September 2022.		85,000		85,000
Unsecured term loan requiring payments of interest only, with a blended interest rate based on a pricing grid with a range of 180 to 255 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the Company's leverage ratios. LIBOR has been swapped to a fixed rate of 1.853%, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.653% based on the Company's current leverage. Matures in January 2023.		100,000		100,000
Unsecured Senior Notes requiring semi-annual payments of interest only, bearing interest at 4.69%; maturing in January 2026.		120,000		—
Unsecured Senior Notes requiring semi-annual payments of interest only, bearing interest at 4.79%; maturing in January 2028.		120,000		—
Total notes payable	$	992,149	$	935,944

Current portion of notes payable	$	10,431	$	186,034
Less: current portion of deferred financing fees		(1,270)		(1,105)
Carrying value of current portion of notes payable	$	9,161	$	184,929

Notes payable, less current portion	$	981,718	$	749,910
Less: long-term portion of deferred financing fees		(4,084)		(3,536)
Carrying value of notes payable, less current portion	$	977,634	$	746,374

Notes Payable Transactions - 2017

In January 2017, the Company received proceeds of $240.0 million in a private placement of senior unsecured notes. The private placement consisted of $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026 (the “Series A Senior Notes”), and $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028 (the “Series B Senior Notes,” together the “Senior Notes”).

In January 2017, the Company used proceeds received from the Senior Notes to repay the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf, which had a balance of $176.0 million and an interest rate of 5.58%. The Marriott Boston Long Wharf loan was scheduled to mature in April 2017, and was available to be repaid without penalty in January 2017.

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

Total interest incurred and expensed on the notes payable was as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations	$	11,897	$	11,966	$	34,724	$	37,560
Noncash interest on derivatives and capital lease obligations, net		4,534		(1,374)		4,883		7,810
Amortization of deferred financing fees		577		544		1,734		1,648
Total interest expense	$	17,008	$	11,136	$	41,341	$	47,018

8. Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities

Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Property, sales and use taxes payable	$	20,085	$	16,965
Income tax payable		421		211
Accrued interest		3,753		1,996
Advance deposits		17,385		14,505
Management fees payable		1,310		1,645
Other		4,647		4,547
Total other current liabilities	$	47,601	$	39,869

Other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Deferred revenue	$	5,663	$	6,045
Deferred rent		19,618		19,807
Deferred incentive management fees		574		—
Deferred gain on sale of asset		—		7,000
Deferred income tax liability		349		—
Other		3,570		3,798
Total other liabilities	$	29,774	$	36,650

As discussed in Note 4, during the third quarter of 2017, the Company determined that its remaining obligation for the Rochester Portfolio’s liability was remote based on the requirements of the Contingencies Topic of the FASB ASC. As such, the Company released the $7.0 million remaining liability and recorded additional gain on the sale of the Rochester Portfolio, which is included in discontinued operations for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

As discussed in Note 6, during the third quarter of 2017, the Company released its full valuation allowance, which was previously held against all of its net U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets, resulting in a deferred tax liability of $0.3 million related to timing differences associated with amortization and deferred revenue of the TRS Lessee, which is included in other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017.

9. Stockholders’ Equity

Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

In March 2016, the Company issued 4,600,000 shares of its 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series E preferred stock”) with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $115.0 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $4.0 million in preferred offering costs. On or after March 11, 2021, the Series E preferred stock will

Table of Contents

be redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date.

Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

In May 2016, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of its 6.45% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series F preferred stock) with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $75.0 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $2.6 million in preferred offering costs. On or after May 17, 2021, the Series F preferred stock will be redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date.

Common Stock

In February 2017, the Company entered into separate “At the Market” Agreements (the “ATM Agreements”) with each of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. In accordance with the terms of the ATM Agreements, the Company may from time to time offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. During the first nine months of 2017, the Company received gross proceeds of $79.4 million, and paid $1.5 million in costs, from the issuance of 4,876,855 shares of its common stock in connection with the ATM Agreements. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has $220.6 million available for sale under the ATM Agreements.

In February 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of the Company’s common and preferred stock. As of September 30, 2017, no shares of either the Company’s common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including the Company’s capital needs, as well as the Company’s common and preferred stock price.

10. Long-Term Incentive Plan

Stock Grants

Restricted shares granted pursuant to the Company’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 1, 2014, generally vest over periods from three to five years from the date of grant.

Compensation expense related to awards of restricted shares are measured at fair value on the date of grant and amortized over the relevant requisite service period or derived service period.

In accordance with the Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company’s amortization expense and forfeitures related to restricted shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Amortization expense, including forfeitures	$	1,848	$	1,539	$	6,188	$	5,616

In addition, the Company capitalizes compensation costs related to all restricted shares granted to certain employees who work on the design and construction of its hotels. These capitalized costs were nominal during both the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and totaled $0.4 million and $0.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Stock Options

In April 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors approved a grant of 200,000 non-qualified stock options (the “Options”) to one of the Company’s former associates. The Options fully vested in April 2009, and will expire on April 27, 2018. The exercise price of the Options is $17.71 per share.

Table of Contents

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Management Agreements

Management agreements with the Company’s third-party hotel managers require the Company to pay between 1.75% and 3.5% of total revenue of the managed hotels to the third-party managers each month as a basic management fee. In addition to basic management fees, provided that certain operating thresholds are met, the Company may also be required to pay incentive management fees to certain of its third-party managers. Total basic management fees, net of key money incentives received from third-party hotel managers, along with incentive management fees incurred by the Company during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were included in other property-level expenses on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Basic management fees	$	8,432	$	8,510	$	25,269	$	25,130
Incentive management fees		1,172		1,541		5,525		4,735
Total basic and incentive management fees	$	9,604	$	10,051	$	30,794	$	29,865

License and Franchise Agreements

The Company has entered into license and franchise agreements related to certain of its hotel properties. The license and franchise agreements require the Company to, among other things, pay monthly fees that are calculated based on specified percentages of certain revenues. The license and franchise agreements generally contain specific standards for, and restrictions and limitations on, the operation and maintenance of the hotels which are established by the franchisors to maintain uniformity in the system created by each such franchisor. Such standards generally regulate the appearance of the hotel, quality and type of goods and services offered, signage and protection of trademarks. Compliance with such standards may from time to time require the Company to make significant expenditures for capital improvements.

Total license and franchise fees incurred by the Company during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were included in franchise costs on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Franchise assessments (1)	$	6,839	$	6,666	$	19,941	$	19,546
Franchise royalties		2,592		2,742		7,426		7,856
Total franchise costs	$	9,431	$	9,408	$	27,367	$	27,402

(1)

Includes advertising, reservation and frequent guest club assessments.

Renovation and Construction Commitments

At September 30, 2017, the Company had various contracts outstanding with third parties in connection with the renovation and repositioning of certain of its hotel properties. The remaining commitments under these contracts at September 30, 2017 totaled $54.2 million.

Capital Leases

The Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile is subject to a building lease which expires in December 2097. Upon acquisition of the hotel in June 2012, the Company evaluated the terms of the lease agreement and determined the lease to be a capital lease pursuant to the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC.

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company corrected an immaterial error by reclassifying the Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles ground lease from an operating lease to a capital lease due to the lease containing a future bargain purchase right option. Upon examination of this future purchase right option, the Company determined that the economic disincentive for continuing to lease the property will be so significant that the Company will likely exercise the option. The Company assessed the cumulative impact of this error on the affected financial statement line items (capital lease assets, capital lease liability, ground lease expense and interest expense) in its previously reported 2016 and 2017 financial statements pursuant to the guidance in ASC 250 Accounting Changes and

Table of Contents

Error Corrections ("ASC 250") and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 99 Materiality. The assessment concluded that the error was not material, individually or in the aggregate, to either the current or any prior period consolidated financial statements. As such, in accordance with ASC 250 (SAB No. 108, Considering Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements), the $4.5 million cumulative adjustment to reclassify the ground lease from an operating lease to a capital lease was recognized in the current period as an increase to interest expense, with no revision to prior periods.

The capital lease assets were included in investment in hotel properties, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):


	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Gross capital lease asset - buildings and improvements	$	58,799	$	58,799
Gross capital lease asset - land		6,605		—
Gross capital lease assets		65,404		58,799
Accumulated depreciation		(7,840)		(6,738)
Net capital lease assets	$	57,564	$	52,061

Future minimum lease payments under the Company’s capital leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of September 30, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):


2017	$	2,357
2018		2,357
2019		2,357
2020		2,365
2021		2,453
Thereafter		139,287
Total minimum lease payments (1)		151,176
Less: Amount representing interest (2)		(124,419)
Present value of net minimum lease payments (3)	$	26,757

(1)

Minimum lease payments do not include percentage rent which may be paid under the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile building lease on the basis of 4.0% of the hotel’s gross room revenues over a certain threshold. Under the Hyatt Chicago Magnificent Mile’s building lease, $20,000 and $36,000 in percentage rent was due during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(2)

Interest includes the amount necessary to reduce net minimum lease payments to present value calculated at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at lease inception.

(3)

The present value of net minimum lease payments are presented on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017 as a current obligation of $1,000, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and as a long-term obligation of $26.8 million, which is included in capital lease obligations, less current portion.

Ground, Building and Air Leases

Total rent expense incurred pursuant to ground, building and air lease agreements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was included in property tax, ground lease and insurance on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Minimum rent, including straight-line adjustments	$	2,124	$	2,251	$	6,804	$	6,857
Percentage rent (1)		1,901		2,802		5,241		7,327
Total	$	4,025	$	5,053	$	12,045	$	14,184

(1)

Several of the Company’s hotels pay percentage rent, which is calculated on operating revenues above certain thresholds.

Rent expense incurred pursuant to a lease on the corporate facility totaled $0.1 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and $0.2 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and is included in corporate overhead expense.

Table of Contents

Concentration of Risk

The concentration of the Company’s hotels in California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, the greater Washington DC area, Louisiana and Florida exposes the Company’s business to economic and severe weather conditions, competition and real and personal property tax rates unique to these locales. As of September 30, 2017, 21 of the Company’s 27 hotels were geographically concentrated as follows:


				Trailing 12-Month
		Percentage of		Total
	Number of Hotels	Total Rooms		Consolidated Revenue
	(unaudited)	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
California	7	29	%	34	%
Hawaii	1	4	%	7	%
Illinois	3	9	%	7	%
Massachusetts	3	15	%	16	%
Greater Washington DC area	3	14	%	13	%
Louisiana	2	6	%	4	%
Florida	2	7	%	7	%

Hurricanes Harvey and Irma

During the third quarter of 2017, four of the Company’s 27 hotels were impacted to varying degrees by Hurricanes Harvey and Irma: the Hilton North Houston; the Marriott Houston; the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina; and the Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®. In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey attained Category 4 intensity as it made landfall in the Eastern and Southern United States, inflicting widespread damage in Texas, among other areas. The Company’s Houston hotels remained open during Hurricane Harvey; however, they both sustained wind-driven rain infiltration and water damage within some of the guestrooms, meeting space and public areas. In September 2017, Hurricane Irma attained Category 4 intensity as it made landfall in Florida, inflicting widespread damage, particularly in the Florida Keys, in which the Company’s Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina is located. The hotel closed on September 7, 2017, following a mandatory evacuation order, and partially reopened on September 27, 2017. The property sustained limited damage as a result of Hurricane Irma, and the hotel was able to reopen all guestrooms on October 19, 2017. Finally, the Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld® hotel in Orlando, Florida remained open and operational during Hurricane Irma and sustained minimal damage.

The Company maintains customary property, casualty, environmental, flood and business interruption insurance at all of its hotels, the coverage of which is subject to certain limitations including higher deductibles in the event of a named storm. The Company is evaluating its ability to submit claims at each of the Houston hotels for portions of the restoration expense incurred. For the Houston hotels, the Company accrued combined hurricane-related restoration expense of $0.9 million as of September 30, 2017, which is included in repairs and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. The deductibles related to property damage at the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina are structured on a building by building basis, none of which sustained enough damage to exceed their deductibles. At September 30, 2017, the Company accrued hurricane-related restoration expense of $0.7 million for the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina, along with $0.1 million for the Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®, both of which are included in repairs and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. Should the Company incur additional hurricane-related costs in the future at any of these four hotels, additional expense will be recognized as they are incurred.

In addition, the Company expects to file a claim under its business interruption insurance policy for business profits lost at the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina as a result of the damage suffered by Hurricane Irma. Once the claim is settled with the Company’s insurance carriers, the payments, if any, will be recorded in the period or periods in which they are received.

Other

The Company has provided customary unsecured environmental indemnities to certain lenders. The Company has performed due diligence on the potential environmental risks, including obtaining an independent environmental review from outside environmental consultants. These indemnities obligate the Company to reimburse the indemnified parties for damages related to certain environmental matters. There is no term or damage limitation on these indemnities; however, if an environmental matter arises, the Company could have recourse against other previous owners or a claim against its environmental insurance policies.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had $0.5 million of outstanding irrevocable letters of credit to guarantee the Company’s financial obligations related to workers’ compensation insurance programs from prior policy years. The beneficiaries of these letters of

Table of Contents

credit may draw upon these letters of credit in the event of a contractual default by the Company relating to each respective obligation. No draws have been made through September 30, 2017.

The Company is subject to various claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings, including routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, regarding the operation of its hotels and Company matters. While it is not possible to ascertain the ultimate outcome of such matters, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts covered by insurance will not have a material adverse impact on its financial condition or results of operations. The outcome of claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings brought against the Company, however, is subject to significant uncertainties.

Table of Contents

Cautionary Statement

This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and includes this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe the Company’s future plans, strategies, opinions and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “project,” or similar expressions. You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control, and which could materially affect actual results, performances or achievements. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Company’s expectations will be realized. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider the risks outlined in detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2017, under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including but not limited to the following factors:

general economic and business conditions, including a U.S. recession, changes in the European Union or global economic slowdown, which may diminish the desire for leisure travel or the need for business travel, as well as any type of flu or disease-related pandemic, affecting the lodging and travel industry, internationally, nationally and locally;

our need to operate as a REIT and comply with other applicable laws and regulations, including new laws, interpretations or court decisions that may change the federal tax laws or the federal income tax consequences of our qualification as a REIT;

rising hotel operating expenses, including the impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or its potential replacement, increases in minimum wages, changes in work rules or additional costs incurred from new or renegotiated labor contracts;

relationships with, and the requirements and reputation of, our franchisors and hotel brands;

relationships with, and the requirements, performance and reputation of, the managers of our hotels;

the ground, building or air leases for six of the 27 hotels held for investment as of September 30, 2017;

competition for the acquisition of hotels, and our ability to complete acquisitions and dispositions;

performance of hotels after they are acquired;

new hotel supply, or alternative lodging options such as timeshare, vacation rentals or sharing services such as Airbnb, in our markets, which could harm our occupancy levels and revenue at our hotels;

competition from hotels not owned by us;

the need for renovations, repositionings and other capital expenditures for our hotels;

the impact, including any delays, of renovations and repositionings on hotel operations;

changes in our business strategy or acquisition or disposition plans;

our level of debt, including secured, unsecured, fixed and variable rate debt;

financial and other covenants in our debt and preferred stock;

our hotels and related goodwill may become impaired, or our hotels which have previously become impaired may become further impaired, in the future, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations;

volatility in the capital markets and the effect on lodging demand or our ability to obtain capital on favorable terms or at all;

potential adverse tax consequences in the event that our operating leases with our taxable REIT subsidiaries are not held to have been made on an arm’s-length basis;

system security risks, data protection breaches, cyber-attacks, including those impacting our hotel managers or other third parties, and systems integration issues; and

other events beyond our control, including terrorist attacks or civil unrest.

These factors may cause our actual events to differ materially from the expectations expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement. Except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, the Company disclaims any obligations or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein (or elsewhere) to reflect any change in the Company’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

Table of Contents

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company,” “we” or “us”) is a Maryland corporation. We operate as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”). A REIT is a corporation that directly or indirectly owns real estate assets and has elected to be taxable as a real estate investment trust. To qualify for taxation as a REIT, the REIT must meet certain requirements, including regarding the composition of its assets and the sources of its income. REITs generally are not subject to federal income taxes at the corporate level as long as they pay stockholder dividends equivalent to 100% of their taxable income. REITs are required to distribute to stockholders at least 90% of their REIT taxable income. We own, directly or indirectly, 100% of the interests of Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (the “Operating Partnership”), which is the entity that directly or indirectly owns our hotel properties. We also own 100% of the interests of our taxable REIT subsidiary, Sunstone Hotel TRS Lessee, Inc., which, directly or indirectly, leases all of our hotels from the Operating Partnership, and engages independent third-parties to manage our hotels.

We own primarily urban and resort upper upscale hotels in the United States. As of September 30, 2017, we had interests in 27 hotels (the “27 hotels”). Of the 27 hotels, we classify 24 as upper upscale, two as upscale and one as luxury as defined by Smith Travel Research, Inc. All but two (the Boston Park Plaza and the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina) of our 27 hotels are operated under nationally recognized brands such as Marriott, Hilton and Hyatt, which are among the most respected and widely recognized brands in the lodging industry. We believe the largest and most stable segment of travelers prefer the consistent service and quality associated with nationally recognized brands and well-known independent hotels.

We seek to own hotels primarily in urban and resort locations that benefit from significant barriers to entry by competitors and diverse economic drivers. As of September 30, 2017, the hotels comprising our 27 hotel portfolio average 489 rooms in size.

Our mission is to create meaningful value for our stockholders by producing superior long-term returns through the ownership of long-term relevant lodging real estate. Our values include transparency, trust, ethical conduct, honest communication and discipline. As demand for lodging generally fluctuates with the overall economy, we seek to own hotels that will maintain a high appeal with travelers over long periods of time and will generate economic earnings materially in excess of recurring capital requirements. Our strategy is to maximize stockholder value through focused asset management and disciplined capital recycling, which is likely to include selective acquisitions and dispositions, while maintaining balance sheet flexibility and strength. Our goal is to maintain low leverage and high financial flexibility to position the Company to create value throughout all phases of the operating and financial cycles.

2017 Year-To-Date Highlights

In January 2017, we received proceeds of $240.0 million in a private placement of senior unsecured notes. The private placement consisted of $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026 (the “Series A Senior Notes”), and $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028 (the “Series B Senior Notes,” together the “Senior Notes”).

In January 2017, we used proceeds received from the Senior Notes to repay the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf, which had a balance of $176.0 million and an interest rate of 5.58%. The Marriott Boston Long Wharf loan was scheduled to mature in April 2017, and was available to be repaid without penalty in January 2017.

In February 2017, we sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach, California for net proceeds of $122.8 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. The sale did not represent a strategic shift that had a major impact on our business plan or our primary markets, and, therefore, did not qualify as a discontinued operation.

In February 2017, we entered into separate “At the Market” Agreements (the “ATM Agreements”) with each of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. In accordance with the terms of the ATM Agreements, we may from time to time offer and sell our shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. During the first nine months of 2017, we received gross proceeds of $79.4 million, and paid $1.5 million in costs, from the issuance of 4,876,855 shares of our common stock in connection with the ATM Agreements. As of September 30, 2017, we have $220.6 million available for sale under the ATM Agreements.

In February 2017, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of our common and preferred stock. As of September 30, 2017, no shares of either our common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including our capital needs, as well as our common and preferred stock price.

Table of Contents

In June 2017, we sold the 199-room Marriott Park City, Utah for net proceeds of $27.0 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $1.2 million. The sale did not represent a strategic shift that had a major impact on our business plan or our primary markets, and, therefore, did not qualify as a discontinued operation.

In July 2017, we purchased the newly-developed 175-room Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina in Key West, Florida for a net purchase price of $173.9 million, including prorations. The purchase of the hotel included a marina, wet and dry boat slips and other customary marina amenities. We incurred and expensed acquisition related costs of $0.4 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively.

During the third quarter of 2017, four of our 27 hotels were impacted to varying degrees by Hurricanes Harvey and Irma: the Hilton North Houston; the Marriott Houston; the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina; and the Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®. In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey attained Category 4 intensity as it made landfall in the Eastern and Southern United States, inflicting widespread damage in Texas, among other areas. Our two Houston hotels remained open during Hurricane Harvey; however, they both sustained wind-driven rain infiltration and water damage within some of the guestrooms, meeting space and public areas. In September 2017, Hurricane Irma attained Category 4 intensity as it made landfall in Florida, inflicting widespread damage, particularly in the Florida Keys, in which our Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina is located. The hotel closed on September 7, 2017, following a mandatory evacuation order, and then partially reopened on September 27, 2017. The property sustained limited damage as a result of Hurricane Irma, and the hotel was able to reopen all guestrooms on October 19, 2017. Finally, our Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld® hotel in Orlando, Florida remained open and operational during Hurricane Irma and sustained minimal damage.

We maintain customary property, casualty, environmental, flood and business interruption insurance at all of our hotels, the coverage of which is subject to certain limitations including higher deductibles in the event of a named storm. We are evaluating our ability to submit claims at each of the Houston hotels for portions of their repair and maintenance expenses. For our Houston hotels, we accrued combined hurricane-related restoration expense of $0.9 million as of September 30, 2017, which is included in our repairs and maintenance expense in our consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. The deductibles related to property damage at the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina are structured on a building by building basis, none of which sustained enough damage to exceed their deductibles. At September 30, 2017, we accrued hurricane-related restoration expense of $0.7 million for the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina, along with $0.1 million for the Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®, both of which are included in our repairs and maintenance expense in our consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. Should we incur additional hurricane-related costs in the future for any of these four hotels, additional expense will be recognized at that time.

In addition, we expect to file a claim under our business interruption insurance policy for business profits lost at the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina as a result of the damage suffered by Hurricane Irma. Once the claim is settled with the Company’s insurance carriers, the payments, if any, will be recorded in the period or periods in which they are received.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, combined with continued operational declines due to weakness in the Houston market, and in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), we identified indicators of impairment and reviewed our two Houston hotels for possible impairment. Based on each hotel’s undiscounted cash flow analysis, which took into account each hotel’s expected cash flow from operations, anticipated holding period and estimated proceeds from disposition, we determined that neither hotel’s carrying value was fully recoverable. As such, during the third quarter of 2017, we recorded a total impairment charge of $34.4 million, including $27.1 million for the Hilton North Houston and $7.3 million for the Marriott Houston, which is included in impairment loss on our consolidated statements of operations for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Operating Activities

Revenues. Substantially all of our revenues are derived from the operation of our hotels. Specifically, our revenues consist of the following:

Room revenue, which is the product of the number of rooms sold and the average daily room rate, or “ADR,” as defined below;

Food and beverage revenue, which is comprised of revenue realized in the hotel food and beverage outlets as well as banquet and catering events; and

Other operating revenue, which includes ancillary hotel revenue and other items primarily driven by occupancy such as telephone/internet, parking, spa, resort and other facility fees, entertainment and other guest services. Additionally, this category includes, among other things, attrition and cancellation revenue, tenant revenue derived from hotel space leased by third parties and any performance guarantee payments.

Table of Contents

Expenses. Our expenses consist of the following:

Room expense, which is primarily driven by occupancy and, therefore, has a significant correlation with room revenue;

Food and beverage expense, which is primarily driven by food and beverage sales and banquet and catering bookings and, therefore, has a significant correlation with food and beverage revenue;

Other operating expense, which includes the corresponding expense of other operating revenue, advertising and promotion, repairs and maintenance, utilities, and franchise costs;

Property tax, ground lease and insurance expense, which includes the expenses associated with property tax, ground lease and insurance payments, each of which is primarily a fixed expense, however property tax is subject to regular revaluations based on the specific tax regulations and practices of each municipality;

Other property-level expenses, which includes our property-level general and administrative expenses, such as payroll and related costs, contract and professional fees, credit and collection expenses, employee recruitment, relocation and training expenses, management fees and other costs;

Corporate overhead expense, which includes our corporate-level expenses, such as payroll and related costs, amortization of deferred stock compensation, business acquisition and due diligence costs, legal expenses, contract and professional fees, entity-level state franchise and minimum taxes, travel expenses, office rent and other costs;

Depreciation and amortization expense, which includes depreciation on our hotel buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment (“FF&E”), along with amortization on our franchise fees and certain intangibles. Additionally, this category includes depreciation and amortization related to FF&E for our corporate office; and

Impairment loss, which includes the charges we have recognized to reduce the carrying values of our two Houston hotels on our balance sheet to their fair values in association with our impairment evaluations.

Other Revenue and Expense. Other revenue and expense consists of the following:

Interest and other income, which includes interest we have earned on our restricted and unrestricted cash accounts, as well as any energy or other rebates we have received, any miscellaneous income or any gains or losses we have recognized on sales or redemptions of assets other than real estate investments;

Interest expense, which includes interest expense incurred on our outstanding fixed and variable rate debt and capital lease obligations, gains or losses on derivatives, amortization of deferred financing fees, and any loan fees incurred on our debt;

Loss on extinguishment of debt, which includes losses recognized on amendments or early repayments of mortgages or other debt obligations from the accelerated amortization of deferred financing fees, along with any costs incurred;

Gain on sale of assets, which includes the gains we recognized on our sales of the Sheraton Cerritos in May 2016, the Fairmont Newport Beach in February 2017 and the Marriott Park City in June 2017, as none of these sales qualified as a discontinued operation;

Income tax benefit, which includes federal and state income taxes related to continuing operations charged to the Company net of any refunds received, any adjustments to our valuation allowance, and any adjustments to unrecognized tax positions, along with any related interest and penalties incurred;

Income from discontinued operations, which includes the results of operations for any hotels or other real estate investments sold during the reporting period that qualify as a discontinued operation, along with the gain or loss realized on the sale of these assets and any extinguishments of related debt or income tax provisions;

Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest, which includes net income attributable to the outside 25.0% interest in the joint venture that owns the Hilton San Diego Bayfront; and

Preferred stock dividends and redemption charge, which includes dividends accrued on our Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series D preferred stock”) until its redemption in April 2016, as well as dividends accrued on our Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series E preferred stock”) and our Series F Cumulative

Table of Contents

Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series F preferred stock”), both of which were issued in 2016, along with any redemption charges for perpetual stock redemptions made in excess of net carrying value.

Operating Performance Indicators. The following performance indicators are commonly used in the hotel industry:

Occupancy, which is the quotient of total rooms sold divided by total rooms available;

Average daily room rate, or ADR, which is the quotient of room revenue divided by total rooms sold;

Revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is the product of occupancy and ADR, and does not include food and beverage revenue, or other operating revenue;

Comparable RevPAR, which we define as the RevPAR generated by hotels we owned as of the end of the reporting period, but excluding those hotels that we classified as held for sale, those hotels that are undergoing a material renovation or repositioning and those hotels whose room counts have materially changed during either the current or prior year. For hotels that were not owned for the entirety of the comparison periods, comparable RevPAR is calculated using RevPAR generated during periods of prior ownership. We refer to this subset of our hotels used to calculate comparable RevPAR as our “Comparable Portfolio.” Currently, our Comparable Portfolio is comprised of 26 hotels, which is all of the 27 hotels excluding the newly-developed Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina, which was not open until January 2017;

RevPAR index, which is the quotient of a hotel’s RevPAR divided by the average RevPAR of its competitors, multiplied by 100. A RevPAR index in excess of 100 indicates a hotel is achieving higher RevPAR than the average of its competitors. In addition to absolute RevPAR index, we monitor changes in RevPAR index;

EBITDA, which is net income (loss), excluding: noncontrolling interests; interest expense; benefit or provision for income taxes, including any changes to deferred tax assets or valuation allowances, and income taxes applicable to the sale of assets; and depreciation and amortization;

Adjusted EBITDA, which is EBITDA adjusted to exclude: amortization of deferred stock compensation; the impact of any gain or loss from asset sales; impairment charges; uninsured property damage resulting from natural disasters; prior year property tax assessments or credits; and any other nonrecurring identified adjustments;

Funds from operations (“FFO”) attributable to common stockholders, which is net income (loss), excluding: preferred stock dividends and any redemption charges; noncontrolling interests; gains and losses from sales of property; real estate-related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs); and real estate-related impairment losses; and

Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders, which is FFO attributable to common stockholders adjusted to exclude: penalties; written-off deferred financing costs; non-real estate-related impairment losses; uninsured property damage resulting from natural disasters; income tax benefits or provisions associated with any changes to deferred tax assets or valuation allowances, the application of net operating loss carryforwards and uncertain tax positions; and any other nonrecurring identified adjustments.

Table of Contents

Factors Affecting Our Operating Results. The primary factors affecting our operating results include overall demand for hotel rooms, the pace of new hotel development, or supply, and the relative performance of our operators in increasing revenue and controlling hotel operating expenses.

Demand. The demand for lodging generally fluctuates with the overall economy. In aggregate, demand for our hotels has improved each year since 2010. In 2016, Comparable Portfolio RevPAR, which was affected by significant repositionings at both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort, increased 0.7% as compared to 2015, with a 40 basis point decrease in occupancy. With these two significant repositionings complete, our third quarter and year-to-date Comparable Portfolio RevPAR increased 2.0% and 3.3%, respectively, in 2017 as compared to the same periods in 2016. Occupancy decreased 40 basis points and 30 basis points during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2016.

Supply. The addition of new competitive hotels affects the ability of existing hotels to absorb demand for lodging and, therefore, impacts the ability to drive RevPAR and profits. The development of new hotels is largely driven by construction costs and expected performance of existing hotels. In aggregate, we expect the U.S. hotel supply to increase over the near term. On a market-by-market basis, some markets may experience new hotel room openings at or greater than historic levels, including in Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, New York City, Portland and Washington DC where there are currently higher-than-average supplies of new hotel room openings. Additionally, an increase in the supply of vacation rental or sharing services such as Airbnb also affects the ability of existing hotels to absorb demand for lodging.

Revenues and expenses. We believe that marginal improvements in RevPAR index, even in the face of declining revenues, are a good indicator of the relative quality and appeal of our hotels, and our operators’ effectiveness in maximizing revenues. Similarly, we also evaluate our operators’ effectiveness in minimizing incremental operating expenses in the context of increasing revenues or, conversely, in reducing operating expenses in the context of declining revenues.

With respect to improving RevPAR index, we continue to work with our hotel operators to optimize revenue management initiatives while taking into consideration market demand trends and the pricing strategies of competitor hotels in our markets. We also develop capital investment programs designed to ensure each of our hotels is well renovated and positioned to appeal to groups and individual travelers fitting target guest profiles. Increased capital investment in our properties may lead to short-term revenue disruption and negatively impact RevPAR index. Our revenue management initiatives are generally oriented towards maximizing ADR even if the result may be lower occupancy than may be achieved through lower ADR. Increases in RevPAR attributable to increases in ADR may be accompanied by minimal additional expenses, while increases in RevPAR attributable to higher occupancy may result in higher variable expenses such as housekeeping, labor and utilities expense. Our Comparable Portfolio RevPAR index increased 150 basis points during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. The increase in our Comparable Portfolio RevPAR index was due in part to increased rates at our Boston Park Plaza and Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning and at our Hyatt Regency Newport Beach due to less competition from area hotels under renovation, along with a strong group base that allowed the hotel to increase rates. These increases were partially offset by decreased rates at our Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles and Renaissance Los Angeles Airport due to increased competition from area hotels that were newly constructed or under renovation during the first nine months of 2016, and at our Houston hotels due to due to a weak energy market combined with Hurricane Harvey-related cancellations.

We continue to work with our operators to identify operational efficiencies designed to reduce expenses while minimally affecting guest experience and hotel employee satisfaction. Key asset management initiatives include optimizing hotel staffing levels, increasing the efficiency of the hotels, such as installing energy efficient management and inventory control systems, and selectively combining certain food and beverage outlets. Our operational efficiency initiatives may be difficult to implement, as most categories of variable operating expenses, such as utilities and housekeeping labor costs, fluctuate with changes in occupancy. Furthermore, our hotels operate with significant fixed costs, such as general and administrative expense, insurance, property taxes, and other expenses associated with owning hotels, over which our operators have little control. We have experienced, either currently or in the past, increases in hourly wages, employee benefits (especially health insurance), utility costs and property insurance, which have negatively affected our operating margins. Moreover, there are limits to how far our operators can reduce expenses without affecting brand standards or the competitiveness of our hotels.

Table of Contents

Operating Results. The following table presents our unaudited operating results for our total portfolio for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, including the amount and percentage change in the results between the two periods.


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		Change $		Change %
	(unaudited and in thousands, except statistical data)
REVENUES
Room	$	215,768	$	217,672	$	(1,904)	(0.9)	%
Food and beverage		68,821		68,899		(78)	(0.1)	%
Other operating		19,320		16,733		2,587	15.5	%
Total revenues		303,909		303,304		605	0.2	%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Hotel operating		174,947		172,621		2,326	1.3	%
Other property-level expenses		34,511		35,003		(492)	(1.4)	%
Corporate overhead		7,233		6,392		841	13.2	%
Depreciation and amortization		39,719		40,442		(723)	(1.8)	%
Impairment loss		34,427		—		34,427	100.0	%
Total operating expenses		290,837		254,458		36,379	14.3	%
Operating income		13,072		48,846		(35,774)	(73.2)	%
Interest and other income		1,027		283		744	262.9	%
Interest expense		(17,008)		(11,136)		(5,872)	(52.7)	%
(Loss) income before income taxes and discontinued operations		(2,909)		37,993		(40,902)	(107.7)	%
Income tax benefit		12,991		1,434		11,557	805.9	%
Income from continuing operations		10,082		39,427		(29,345)	(74.4)	%
Income from discontinued operations		7,000		—		7,000	100.0	%
NET INCOME		17,082		39,427		(22,345)	(56.7)	%
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(2,169)		(2,053)		(116)	(5.7)	%
Preferred stock dividends		(3,208)		(3,207)		(1)	—	%
INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	11,705	$	34,167	$	(22,462)	(65.7)	%

The following table presents our unaudited operating results for our total portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, including the amount and percentage change in the results between the two periods.


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		Change $		Change %
	(unaudited and in thousands, except statistical data)
REVENUES
Room	$	629,788	$	629,145	$	643	0.1	%
Food and beverage		222,943		221,431		1,512	0.7	%
Other operating		50,717		49,180		1,537	3.1	%
Total revenues		903,448		899,756		3,692	0.4	%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Hotel operating		516,313		517,624		(1,311)	(0.3)	%
Other property-level expenses		105,015		107,698		(2,683)	(2.5)	%
Corporate overhead		21,585		19,918		1,667	8.4	%
Depreciation and amortization		120,051		121,169		(1,118)	(0.9)	%
Impairment loss		34,427		—		34,427	100.0	%
Total operating expenses		797,391		766,409		30,982	4.0	%
Operating income		106,057		133,347		(27,290)	(20.5)	%
Interest and other income		2,597		1,127		1,470	130.4	%
Interest expense		(41,341)		(47,018)		5,677	12.1	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(4)		(259)		255	98.5	%
Gain on sale of assets		45,474		18,223		27,251	149.5	%
Income before income taxes and discontinued operations		112,783		105,420		7,363	7.0	%
Income tax benefit		12,541		959		11,582	1,207.7	%
Income from continuing operations		125,324		106,379		18,945	17.8	%
Income from discontinued operations		7,000		—		7,000	100.0	%
NET INCOME		132,324		106,379		25,945	24.4	%
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(6,344)		(5,358)		(986)	(18.4)	%
Preferred stock dividends and redemption charge		(9,622)		(12,756)		3,134	24.6	%
INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	116,358	$	88,265	$	28,093	31.8	%

Table of Contents

Operating Statistics. The following table includes comparisons of the key operating metrics for our Comparable Portfolio (26 hotels).


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2017						2016						Change
	Occ%		ADR		RevPAR		Occ%		ADR		RevPAR		Occ%		ADR		RevPAR
Comparable Portfolio	85.6	%	$	209.23	$	179.10	86.0	%	$	204.26	$	175.66	(40)	bps	2.4	%	2.0	%

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017						2016						Change
	Occ%		ADR		RevPAR		Occ%		ADR		RevPAR		Occ%		ADR		RevPAR
Comparable Portfolio	83.4	%	$	209.76	$	174.94	83.7	%	$	202.43	$	169.43	(30)	bps	3.6	%	3.3	%

Room revenue. Room revenue decreased $1.9 million, or 0.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The decrease in room revenue during the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was due to our sales of the Fairmont Newport Beach in February 2017 and the Marriott Park City in June 2017 (the “Two 2017 Sold Hotels”). The sales of the Two 2017 Sold Hotels caused room revenue to decrease by $7.4 million in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

The decrease in room revenue caused by the sales of the Two 2017 Sold Hotels was partially offset by our purchase of the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina in July 2017, as well as by increased room revenue generated by the same 26 hotels we owned during both the third quarters and first nine months of 2017 and 2016 (our “Existing Portfolio”). The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina generated $1.2 million in room revenue during the third quarter of 2017. Both revenues and expenses at the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina were negatively impacted during the third quarter of 2017 by Hurricane Irma, as noted above in the 2017 Year-To-Date Highlights. Room revenue generated by our Existing Portfolio increased $4.3 million during the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to an increase in ADR ($5.1 million), partially offset by a decrease in occupancy ($0.8 million). The increase in ADR was primarily driven by strong ADR growth post-repositioning at both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort. During the third quarter of 2016, the Boston Park Plaza was just beginning to ramp up post-repositioning, while the Wailea Beach Resort continued to have 12,570 room nights out of service, displacing approximately $3.1 million in room revenue based on the hotel achieving a potential 82.7% occupancy rate and RevPAR of $205.72 without the renovation. Strong ADR growth was also achieved by our Renaissance Washington DC and Marriott Tysons Corner hotels due to an improved convention calendar in Washington DC, which allowed the hotels to increase both group and transient room rates. These increases in ADR were partially offset by increased competition from new hotels in both Chicago and New York City and from recently renovated hotels near the Los Angeles International Airport. In addition, ADR decreased in Philadelphia due to the impact of the Democratic National Convention in July 2016, in Orlando due to record breaking group rooms during the third quarter 2016, and in San Francisco due to a shift in the convention calendar.

The decrease in our Existing Portfolio’s occupancy during the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was caused by 13,874 fewer group room nights, partially offset by 9,997 more transient room nights. Group room nights decreased in Philadelphia due to the impact of the Democratic National Convention in July 2016, in Orlando due to strong group performance during the third quarter 2016, and in San Diego due to a weak third quarter 2017 convention calendar. These decreases were partially offset by increases in group room nights at both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning, and in San Francisco due to the hotel generating stronger in-house business during the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Transient room nights increased most significantly at the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning, and in San Diego where the hotel needed to backfill occupancy due to a weak third quarter 2017 convention calendar. These increases were partially offset by decreases in transient room nights at our Houston hotels due to a weak energy market combined with Hurricane Harvey-related cancellations, and at the Boston Park Plaza where the hotel strategically re-mixed out of lower rated transient business.

Room revenue increased $0.6 million, or 0.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina generated $1.2 million in room revenue during the first nine months of 2017. Both revenues and expenses at the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina were negatively impacted by Hurricane Irma, as noted above in the 2017 Year-To-Date Highlights.

Room revenue generated by our Existing Portfolio, increased $18.2 million during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to an increase in ADR ($21.9 million), partially offset by a decrease in occupancy ($3.7 million). The increase in ADR was primarily driven by strong demand, allowing for strong ADR growth in Washington DC due to improved convention calendars. In addition, both the Renaissance Washington DC and the Marriott Tysons Corner experienced double-digit

Table of Contents

ADR growth earlier in the year as a result of the Presidential inauguration and the Women’s March on Washington. The Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort also experienced strong ADR growth post-repositioning. During the first nine months of 2016, a combined total of 27,459 room nights were out of service at these two hotels, displacing approximately $6.5 million in room revenue based on the hotels achieving a potential combined 77.6% occupancy rate and combined RevPAR of $165.06 without the renovations. These increases in ADR were partially offset by weak markets and convention calendars in Baltimore, Houston and New Orleans, increased competition in Chicago and New York City, and a weak energy market combined with Hurricane Harvey-related cancellations in Houston.

The decrease in our Existing Portfolio’s occupancy during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was caused by 19,353 fewer group room nights slightly offset by 1,614 more transient room nights. Both group and transient room nights decreased at our Houston hotels due to a weak energy market combined with Hurricane Harvey-related cancellations and a decline in contract business. Group room nights decreased in Orlando, New Orleans, San Francisco and San Diego due to weak convention calendars. These decreases were partially offset by increases in group room nights at both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning. The 1,614 increase in transient room nights was caused by significant increases at both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning, and in Orlando due to increased leisure demand from new attractions at local theme parks. These transient room increases were largely offset by decreases at our Houston hotels as noted above, and at several of our hotels who pushed transient rate at the expense of occupancy.

We sold one hotel in 2016 and two hotels year-to-date in 2017: the Sheraton Cerritos in May 2016; the Fairmont Newport Beach in February 2017; and the Marriott Park City in June 2017 (the “Three Sold Hotels”). The sales of the Three Sold Hotels caused room revenue to decrease by $18.7 million in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Food and beverage revenue. Food and beverage revenue decreased $0.1 million, or 0.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The Two 2017 Sold Hotels caused food and beverage revenue to decrease by $3.0 million in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina generated $0.2 million in food and beverage revenue during the third quarter of 2017.

Food and beverage revenue generated by our Existing Portfolio increased $2.7 million during the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to increased banquet revenue at the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort due to higher quality group business available post-repositioning, as well as higher food, beverage and event technology spend per group attendee at both the Hyatt Regency San Francisco and the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. These increases were partially offset by decreased banquet revenue in Orlando due to strong group business during the third quarter last year. Outlet revenue also increased in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 at the Wailea Beach Resort due to the hotel regaining displaced restaurant revenues post-repositioning, as well as at the Hyatt Regency San Francisco due to the introduction of a new grab-and-go concept, and at the Hilton San Diego Bayfront due to an increase in leisure occupancy. These increases were partially offset by decreased outlet revenue at the Renaissance Washington DC due to the leasing of a previously hotel-run outlet, as well as at the Boston Park Plaza due to a decrease in transient occupancy and at the Marriott Quincy as the newly-renovated restaurant begins to ramp up.

Food and beverage revenue increased $1.5 million, or 0.7%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina generated $0.2 million in food and beverage revenue during the first nine months of 2017.

Food and beverage revenue generated by our Existing Portfolio increased $9.6 million during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to increased banquet and outlet revenue at the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort due to additional restaurant and meeting space options available post-repositioning, as well as at the Hyatt Regency San Francisco due to the redesign of certain restaurant and lounge areas and the introduction of a new grab-and-go concept, and at the Hilton San Diego Bayfront due to strong convention calendar in the first half of the year, along with an increase in the number of customers at the hotel’s outlets. In addition, banquet revenue increased during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 at the JW Marriott New Orleans and the Renaissance Baltimore due to increases in the number of groups, as well as group spend. These increases were partially offset by decreased banquet revenue in Orlando due to a strong 2016, as well as in Houston due to a weak market and hurricane-related cancellations, along with at the Marriott Quincy due to renovation of the function space during the first quarter of 2017. In addition, outlet revenue decreased at the Renaissance Washington DC due to the leasing of a previously hotel-run outlet combined with decreased guest capture at the remaining outlets, and at the Marriott Quincy due to a restaurant renovation during the first few months of 2017. In addition, room service revenue decreased at the Hyatt Regency San Francisco due to the restructuring of this dining option.

Table of Contents

The Three Sold Hotels caused food and beverage revenue to decrease by $8.3 million in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Other operating revenue. Other operating revenue increased $2.6 million, or 15.5%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina generated $0.4 million in other operating revenue during the third quarter of 2017.

Other operating revenue in our Existing Portfolio increased $3.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to our managers taking a more aggressive stance on collecting attrition and cancellation revenues, along with increased resort fees and tenant lease revenue (including the year-over-year effect of our third quarter 2016 write-off of a $0.2 million above market lease intangible asset due to the renovation-related closure of a tenant’s space at the Wailea Beach Resort). These increases in other operating revenue were partially offset by decreases in telephone/internet revenue.

The Two 2017 Sold Hotels caused other operating revenue to decrease by $0.8 million in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Other operating revenue increased $1.5 million, or 3.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina generated $0.4 million in other operating revenue during the first nine months of 2017.

Other operating revenue in our Existing Portfolio increased $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to the same reasons noted above in the discussion regarding the third quarter, combined with increased retail revenue at the Wailea Beach Resort. These increases to other operating revenue for the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 were partially offset by decreases in parking revenue, telephone/internet revenue and commissions.

The Three Sold Hotels caused other operating revenue to decrease by $1.7 million in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Hotel operating expenses. Hotel operating expenses, which are comprised of room, food and beverage, advertising and promotion, repairs and maintenance, utilities, franchise costs, property tax, ground lease and insurance, and other hotel operating expenses increased $2.3 million, or 1.3%, during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina generated $2.0 million in hotel operating expenses during the third quarter of 2017, including $0.7 million in Hurricane Irma-related restoration expenses which are included in repairs and maintenance expense in our consolidated statements of operations.

Hotel operating expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased $7.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. This increase is primarily related to the corresponding increases in room revenue, and food and beverage revenue. In addition, hotel operating expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to the following increased expenses: advertising and promotion at the Wailea Beach Resort to promote the hotel post-repositioning; repairs and maintenance due to a total of $1.0 million in hurricane-related restoration expenses recorded for the Houston hotels and the Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®, along with increased payroll and related costs in this department and increased building and elevator maintenance; utilities due to increased electricity, water and sewer costs; franchise costs due to the increase in revenues; property taxes due to increased assessments received at several of our hotels, along with increased appeal fees; and Hawaii general excise tax (“GET”) due to higher revenue at the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning.

The Two 2017 Sold Hotels caused hotel operating expenses to decrease by $6.9 million in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Hotel operating expenses decreased $1.3 million, or 0.3%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The Three Sold Hotels caused hotel operating expenses to decrease by $17.9 million in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Table of Contents

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina generated $2.0 million in hotel operating expenses during the first nine months of 2017, including $0.7 million in Hurricane Irma-related restoration expenses which are included in repairs and maintenance expense in our consolidated statements of operations.

Hotel operating expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased $14.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. This increase is primarily related to the corresponding increases in room revenue, food and beverage revenue and retail revenue. In addition, hotel operating expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to the following increased expenses: advertising and promotion at both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort to promote the hotels post-repositioning; repairs and maintenance due to a total of $1.0 million in hurricane-related restoration expenses recorded for the Houston hotels and the Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®, along with increased payroll and related costs in this department and increased building and elevator maintenance; utilities due to increased water and sewer costs; franchise costs due to the increase in revenues; property taxes due to increased assessments received at several of our hotels, along with the year-over-year effect of the variance in assessment decreases received at our three Chicago hotels, partially offset by decreased appeal fees; building rent at the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile as the operating lease credit received from the landlord was less in 2017 than it was in 2016; and Hawaii GET due to higher revenue at the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning.

Other property-level expenses. Other property-level expenses decreased $0.5 million, or 1.4%, during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The Two 2017 Sold Hotels caused other property-level expenses to decrease by $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina generated $0.3 million in other property-level expenses during the third quarter of 2017.

Other property-level expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased $0.6 million in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to increases in the following expenses caused by higher revenue: payroll and related costs; supplies; credit and collection expenses; basic management fees; and employee training expenses. These increases were partially offset by decreases in contract and professional fees, purchase rebates and incentive management fees.

Other property-level expenses decreased $2.7 million, or 2.5%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The Three Sold Hotels caused other property-level expenses to decrease by $3.7 million in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina generated $0.3 million in other property-level expenses during the first nine months of 2017.

Other property-level expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased $0.7 million in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to increases in the following expenses caused by higher revenue: basic and incentive management fees; payroll and related costs; supplies; credit and collection expenses; employee relocation and training; and permits and licenses. Partially offsetting these increased expenses, legal fees decreased during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 as we recognized a $1.0 million lease termination fee in the second quarter of 2016, combined with decreased contract and professional fees and purchase rebates.

Corporate overhead expense. Corporate overhead expense increased $0.8 million, or 13.2%, during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to increased due diligence costs, the majority of which relates to our purchase of the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina in July 2017, combined with increased deferred stock compensation expense, payroll and related costs and donations expense. These increases were partially offset by decreased employee relocation expense and travel expenses.

Corporate overhead expense increased $1.7 million, or 8.4%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to the same reasons noted above in the discussion regarding the third quarter, combined with increased Hawaii GET recognized during the first quarter of 2017 related to a $5.0 million performance guarantee provided by the manager of the Wailea Beach Resort.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $0.7 million, or 1.8%, during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

Table of Contents

The Two 2017 Sold Hotels caused depreciation and amortization to decrease by $1.6 million in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina caused depreciation and amortization to increase $0.7 million in the third quarter of 2017.

Depreciation and amortization expense in our Existing Portfolio increased $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, due to additional depreciation recognized at the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning, partially offset by decreases in depreciation due to fully depreciated assets, as well as the year-over-year effect of our third quarter 2016 write-off of a $0.1 million in-place lease intangible asset due to the renovation-related closure of a tenant’s space at the Wailea Beach Resort.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $1.1 million, or 0.9%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

The Three Sold Hotels caused depreciation and amortization to decrease by $4.5 million in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

The Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina caused depreciation and amortization to increase $0.7 million in the first nine months of 2017.

Depreciation and amortization expense in our Existing Portfolio increased $2.6 million in the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, due to the same reasons noted above in the discussion regarding the third quarter.

Impairment loss. Impairment loss totaled $34.4 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, and zero for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. In the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, combined with continued operational declines due to weakness in the Houston market, and in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the FASB ASC, we identified indicators of impairment and reviewed our two Houston hotels for possible impairment. Based on each hotel’s undiscounted cash flow analysis, which took into account each hotel’s expected cash flow from operations, anticipated holding period and estimated proceeds from disposition, we determined that neither hotel’s carrying value was fully recoverable. As such, during the third quarter of 2017, we recorded a total impairment charge of $34.4 million, including $27.1 million for the Hilton North Houston and $7.3 million for the Marriott Houston, which is included in impairment loss on our consolidated statements of operations for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Interest and other income. Interest and other income increased $0.7 million, or 262.9%, during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. During the third quarter of 2017, we recognized $1.0 million in interest and miscellaneous income. In the third quarter of 2016, we recognized $0.3 million in interest and miscellaneous income.

Interest and other income increased $1.5 million, or 130.4%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. During the first nine months of 2017, we recognized $2.1 million in interest and miscellaneous income, and $0.2 million in energy rebates due to energy efficient renovations at our hotels. In addition, we recognized $0.3 million in earn-out proceeds related to the Royal Palm Miami Beach, which we sold in 2011. With the receipt of the $0.3 million during the first quarter of 2017, the earn-out is complete. In the first nine months of 2016, we recognized $0.8 million in interest and miscellaneous income and $0.3 million in energy rebates due to energy efficient renovations at our hotels.

Interest expense. We incurred interest expense as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations	$	11,897	$	11,966	$	34,724	$	37,560
Noncash interest on derivatives and capital lease obligations, net		4,534		(1,374)		4,883		7,810
Amortization of deferred financing fees		577		544		1,734		1,648
	$	17,008	$	11,136	$	41,341	$	47,018

Interest expense increased $5.9 million, or 52.7%, during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016, and decreased $5.7 million, or 12.1%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as follows:

Table of Contents

Interest expense on our debt and capital lease obligations decreased $0.1 million and $2.8 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2016 as a result of lower balances due to monthly amortization and loan repayments during 2016 and 2017. Partially offsetting these decreases, interest expense on our debt and capital lease obligations increased due to higher interest on our variable rate debt, as well as interest on our Senior Notes issued in January 2017 and the cash component of interest on the Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles ground lease, which we reclassified as a capital lease in the third quarter of 2017 (see discussion below).

Noncash interest on derivatives and capital lease obligations, net increased $5.9 million and decreased $2.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2016. The changes in the fair market values of our derivatives increased interest expense $1.3 million during the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the third quarter of 2016, and decreased interest expense $7.5 million during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Noncash interest on our capital lease obligations increased interest expense $4.6 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same periods in 2016. During the third quarter of 2017, we corrected an immaterial error by reclassifying the Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles ground lease from an operating lease to a capital lease due to the lease containing a future purchase right option. Upon examination of this future purchase right option, we determined that the economic disincentive for continuing to lease the property will be so significant that we will likely exercise the option. This reclassification resulted in a cumulative immaterial increase of $4.5 million to noncash interest expense for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. In addition, the noncash component of interest on our capital lease obligations increased $0.1 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same periods in 2016.

Finally, while amortization of deferred financing fees remained relatively flat in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, amortization of deferred financing fees increased interest expense by $0.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to additional fees incurred on our Senior Notes issued in January 2017.

Our weighted average interest rate per annum, including our variable rate debt obligation, was approximately 4.3% and 4.4% at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Approximately 77.8% of our outstanding notes payable had fixed interest rates at both September 30, 2017 and 2016.

For information regarding our 2017 debt transactions, see the discussion included in “Liquidity and Capital Resources-Debt.”

Loss on extinguishment of debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt totaled zero for both the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and $4,000 and $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. During the first nine months of 2017, we recognized a loss of $4,000 related to our repayment of debt secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf. During the first nine months of 2016, we recognized losses of $0.1 million during the first quarter and $0.2 million during the second quarter related to our repayments of debt secured by the Boston Park Plaza and the Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®, respectively.

Gain on sale of assets. Gain on sale of assets totaled zero for both the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and $45.5 million and $18.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. During the first nine months of 2017, we recognized a $44.3 million net gain on the sale of the Fairmont Newport Beach during the first quarter, and a $1.2 million net gain on the sale of the Marriott Park City during the second quarter. Neither of these sales qualified as a discontinued operation. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recognized an $18.2 million net gain on the sale of the Sheraton Cerritos during the second quarter, which did not qualify as a discontinued operation.

Income tax benefit. We lease our hotels to the TRS Lessee and its subsidiaries, which are subject to federal and state income taxes. In addition, the REIT and Operating Partnership may also be subject to various state and local income taxes. Income tax benefit totaled $13.0 million and $12.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $1.4 million and $1.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. During the third quarter of 2017, we fully released the $13.6 million valuation allowance primarily related to our federal and state net operating loss carryforwards as we determined it was more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized. The decision to release the valuation allowance was made after management considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, including but not limited to, historical operating results, cumulative income in recent years and forecasted earnings. In addition, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, we recognized combined federal and state income tax expense of $0.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, based on 2017 projected taxable income net of operating loss carryforwards for our taxable entities.

As part of our ongoing evaluations of our uncertain tax positions, during the third quarter of 2016, we reversed a $1.5 million income tax accrual that we previously recorded during 2013, plus $0.1 million in accrued interest, related to the 2012 tax year. The reversal was due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for the 2012 tax year. This income tax benefit was partially offset during the third quarter and first nine months of 2016, as we recognized combined federal and state income tax expense of $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, based on 2016 projected taxable income net of operating loss carryforwards for our taxable entities.

Table of Contents

Income from discontinued operations. Income from discontinued operations totaled $7.0 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, and zero for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. During the third quarter of 2017, we recognized an additional $7.0 million gain related to our 2013 sale of four hotels and a laundry facility located in Rochester, Minnesota (the “Rochester Portfolio”). Upon sale of the Rochester Portfolio in 2013, we retained a liability not to exceed $14.0 million. The recognition of the $14.0 million liability reduced our gain on the sale of the Rochester Portfolio. In the second quarter of 2014, we were released from $7.0 million of our liability, and we recorded additional gain on the sale, which we included in discontinued operations. During the third quarter of 2017, we determined that our remaining liability was remote based on the requirements of the Contingencies Topic of the FASB ASC. As such, we recorded additional gain on the sale of the Rochester Portfolio of $7.0 million, which is included in discontinued operations for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest. Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest totaled $2.2 million and $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $6.3 million and $5.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Consistent with the Presentation Topic of the FASB ASC, our net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 includes 100% of the net income generated by the entity that owns the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. The outside 25.0% interest in the entity that owns the Hilton San Diego Bayfront earned net income of $2.2 million and $2.1 million during the third quarter of 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $6.3 million and $5.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Preferred stock dividends and redemption charge. Preferred stock dividends and redemption charge were incurred as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Series D preferred stock	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,428
Series E preferred stock		1,998		1,998		5,994		4,462
Series F preferred stock		1,210		1,209		3,628		1,814
Redemption charge on Series D preferred stock		—		—		—		4,052
	$	3,208	$	3,207	$	9,622	$	12,756

We redeemed all 4,600,000 shares of our Series D preferred stock in April 2016. We recorded a redemption charge of $4.1 million during the second quarter of 2016 related to the original issuance costs of these shares, which were previously included in additional paid in capital. In March 2016, we issued 4,600,000 shares of Series E preferred stock, and in May 2016, we issued 3,000,000 shares of Series F preferred stock.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures. We use the following “non-GAAP financial measures” that we believe are useful to investors as key supplemental measures of our operating performance: EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO attributable to common stockholders, Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders and Comparable Portfolio revenues. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO attributable to common stockholders, Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders and Comparable Portfolio revenues, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to other companies that do not define such terms exactly as the Company. These non-GAAP measures are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. They should not be considered as alternatives to operating profit, cash flow from operations, or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect additional ways of viewing our operations that we believe, when viewed with our GAAP results and the reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business than could be obtained absent this disclosure. For example, we believe that Comparable Portfolio revenues are useful to both us and investors in evaluating our operating performance by removing the impact of non-hotel results such as the amortization of favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts. We also believe that our use of Comparable Portfolio revenues is useful to both us and our investors as it facilitates the comparison of our operating results from period to period by removing fluctuations caused by any acquisitions or dispositions, as well as by those hotels that we classify as held for sale, those hotels that are undergoing a material renovation or repositioning and those hotels whose room counts have materially changed during either the current or prior year. We strongly encourage investors to review our financial information in its entirety and not to rely on a single financial measure.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are commonly used measures of performance in many industries. We believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because these measures help investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and our asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating results. We also believe the use of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA facilitate comparisons between us and other lodging REITs, hotel owners who are not REITs and other capital-intensive companies. In addition, certain covenants included in our indebtedness use EBITDA as a measure of financial compliance. We also use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as measures in determining the value of hotel acquisitions and dispositions.

Table of Contents

Historically, we have adjusted EBITDA when evaluating our performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance, and that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation of net income, is beneficial to an investor’s complete understanding of our operating performance. We adjust EBITDA for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted EBITDA:

Amortization of deferred stock compensation: we exclude the noncash expense incurred with the amortization of deferred stock compensation as this expense is based on historical stock prices at the date of grant to our corporate employees and does not reflect the underlying performance of our hotels.

Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts: we exclude the noncash amortization of the favorable management contract asset recorded in conjunction with our acquisition of the Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, along with the favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts, as applicable, recorded in conjunction with our acquisitions of the Boston Park Plaza, the Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, the Hilton New Orleans St. Charles, the Hyatt Regency San Francisco and the Wailea Beach Resort. We exclude the noncash amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts because it is based on historical cost accounting and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period.

Ground rent adjustments: we exclude the noncash expense incurred from straight-lining our ground lease obligations as this expense does not reflect the actual rent amounts due to the respective lessors in the current period and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period. We do, however, include an adjustment for the cash ground lease expenses recorded on the ground lease at the Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles and the building lease at the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile. In accordance with the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC, we have determined that both of these leases are capital leases, and, therefore, we include a portion of the capital lease payments each month in interest expense. We include an adjustment for ground lease expense on capital leases in order to more accurately reflect the actual rent due to both hotels’ lessors in the current period, as well as the operating performance of both hotels.

Real estate transactions: we exclude the effect of gains and losses on the disposition of depreciable assets because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our assets. In addition, material gains or losses from the depreciated value of the disposed assets could be less important to investors given that the depreciated asset value often does not reflect its market value.

Gains or losses from debt transactions: we exclude the effect of finance charges and premiums associated with the extinguishment of debt, including the acceleration of deferred financing costs from the original issuance of the debt being redeemed or retired because, like interest expense, their removal helps investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure.

Acquisition costs: under GAAP, costs associated with completed acquisitions that meet the definition of a business in accordance with the Business Combinations Topic of the FASB ASC are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the Company or our hotels.

Noncontrolling interest: we deduct the noncontrolling partner’s pro rata share of any EBITDA adjustments related to our consolidated Hilton San Diego Bayfront partnership.

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle: from time to time, the FASB promulgates new accounting standards that require the consolidated statement of operations to reflect the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. We exclude these one-time adjustments, which include the accounting impact from prior periods, because they do not reflect our actual performance for that period.

Impairment losses: we exclude the effect of impairment losses because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. In addition, we believe that impairment charges, which are based off of historical cost account values, are similar to gains (losses) on dispositions and depreciation expense, both of which are also excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.

Other adjustments: we exclude other adjustments that we believe are outside the ordinary course of business because we do not believe these costs reflect our actual performance for that period and/or the ongoing operations of our hotels. Such items may include: lawsuit settlement costs; prior year property tax assessments or credits; property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs; lease terminations; uninsured losses; and any gains or losses we have recognized on sales or redemptions of assets other than real estate investments.

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles our unaudited net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for our hotel portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016

Net income	$	17,082	$	39,427	$	132,324	$	106,379
Operations held for investment:
Depreciation and amortization		39,719		40,442		120,051		121,169
Amortization of lease intangibles		63		62		189		189
Interest expense		17,008		11,136		41,341		47,018
Income tax benefit		(12,991)		(1,434)		(12,541)		(959)
Noncontrolling interest:
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(2,169)		(2,053)		(6,344)		(5,358)
Depreciation and amortization		(660)		(872)		(2,147)		(2,607)
Interest expense		(523)		(424)		(1,468)		(1,251)
EBITDA		57,529		86,284		271,405		264,580

Operations held for investment:
Amortization of deferred stock compensation		1,848		1,539		6,188		5,616
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts, net		20		327		215		342
Noncash ground rent		(281)		465		(841)		1,413
Capital lease obligation interest — cash ground rent		(575)		(351)		(1,277)		(1,053)
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net		14		8		(45,736)		(18,226)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—		—		4		259
Impairment loss		34,427		—		34,427		—
Hurricane-related uninsured losses		1,649		—		1,649		—
Closing costs - completed acquisition		355		—		729		—
Prior year property tax adjustments, net		(448)		(239)		(549)		(4,279)
Property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs		—		18		—		1,578
Lease termination costs		—		—		—		1,000
Noncontrolling interest:
Noncash ground rent		72		(113)		217		(338)
Discontinued operations:
Gain on sale of assets		(7,000)		—		(7,000)		—
		30,081		1,654		(11,974)		(13,688)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	87,610	$	87,938	$	259,431	$	250,892

Adjusted EBITDA was $87.6 million and $87.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $259.4 million and $250.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA decreased $0.3 million during the third quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to the sales of the Two 2017 Sold Hotels in February 2017 and June 2017, partially offset by additional earnings generated by our Existing Portfolio, predominately by both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning.

Adjusted EBITDA increased $8.5 million during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, due to additional earnings generated by the Existing Portfolio, predominately by both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning. Partially offsetting these increases, Adjusted EBITDA decreased primarily due to the sales of the Three Sold Hotels in May 2016, February 2017 and June 2017.

We believe that the presentation of FFO attributable to common stockholders provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance because it is a measure of our operations without regard to specified noncash items such as real estate depreciation and amortization, amortization of lease intangibles, any real estate impairment loss and any gain or loss on sale of real estate assets, all of which are based on historical cost accounting and may be of lesser significance in evaluating our current performance. Our presentation of FFO attributable to common stockholders conforms to the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ (“NAREIT”) definition of “FFO applicable to common shares.” Our presentation may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the terms in accordance with the current NAREIT definition, or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do.

Table of Contents

We also present Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders when evaluating our operating performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance, and may facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and our peer companies. We adjust FFO attributable to common stockholders for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders:

Noncash ground rent: we exclude the noncash expense incurred from straight-lining our ground lease obligations as this expense does not reflect the actual rent amounts due to the respective lessors in the current period and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period.

Gains or losses from debt transactions: we exclude the effect of finance charges and premiums associated with the extinguishment of debt, including the acceleration of deferred financing costs from the original issuance of the debt being redeemed or retired, as well as the noncash interest on our derivatives and capital lease obligations. We believe that these items are not reflective of our ongoing finance costs.

Noncontrolling interest: we deduct the noncontrolling partner’s pro rata share of any FFO adjustments related to our consolidated Hilton San Diego Bayfront partnership.

Other adjustments: we exclude other adjustments that we believe are outside the ordinary course of business because we do not believe these costs reflect our actual performance for that period and/or the ongoing operations of our hotels. Such items may include: lawsuit settlement costs; prior year property tax assessments or credits; changes to deferred tax assets or valuation allowances; property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs; lease terminations; uninsured losses; any gains or losses we have recognized on redemptions of assets other than real estate investments; and income tax benefits or provisions associated with the application of net operating loss carryforwards, uncertain tax positions or with the sale of assets other than real estate investments.

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles our unaudited net income to FFO attributable to common stockholders and Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders for our hotel portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016

Net income	$	17,082	$	39,427	$	132,324	$	106,379
Preferred stock dividends and redemption charge		(3,208)		(3,207)		(9,622)		(12,756)
Operations held for investment:
Real estate depreciation and amortization		39,611		40,296		119,691		120,715
Amortization of lease intangibles		63		62		189		189
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net		14		8		(45,736)		(18,226)
Impairment loss		34,427		—		34,427		—
Noncontrolling interest:
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(2,169)		(2,053)		(6,344)		(5,358)
Real estate depreciation and amortization		(660)		(872)		(2,147)		(2,607)
Discontinued operations:
Gain on sale of assets		(7,000)		—		(7,000)		—
FFO attributable to common stockholders		78,160		73,661		215,782		188,336

Operations held for investment:
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts, net		20		327		215		342
Noncash ground rent		(281)		465		(841)		1,413
Noncash interest on derivatives and capital lease obligations, net		4,534		(1,374)		4,883		7,810
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—		—		4		259
Hurricane-related uninsured losses		1,649		—		1,649		—
Closing costs - completed acquisition		355		—		729		—
Prior year property tax adjustments, net		(448)		(239)		(549)		(4,279)
Property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs		—		18		—		1,578
Lease termination costs		—		—		—		1,000
Noncash income tax benefit		(13,628)		(1,596)		(13,628)		(1,596)
Preferred stock redemption charge		—		—		—		4,052
Noncontrolling interest:
Noncash ground rent		72		(113)		217		(338)
Noncash interest related to loss on derivative		(1)		—		(5)		—
		(7,728)		(2,512)		(7,326)		10,241
Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders	$	70,432	$	71,149	$	208,456	$	198,577

Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders was $70.4 million and $71.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $208.5 million and $198.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders decreased $0.7 million and increased $9.9 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2016 primarily due to the same reasons noted in the discussion above regarding Adjusted EBITDA. In addition, the decrease in interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same periods in 2016 positively affected Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders.

Investing Activities

Acquisitions. In July 2017, we acquired the 175-room Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina located in Key West, Florida for a net purchase price of $173.9 million, including prorations. The newly constructed and recently opened fee simple hotel also includes a marina, wet and dry boat slips and other customary marina amenities. We funded the acquisition with available cash on hand, including proceeds from the recent sales of the Marriott Park City and the Fairmont Newport Beach, as well as net proceeds received from our recent equity issuances under our ATM Agreements. We did not acquire any hotels during 2016.

While our primary focus is on acquiring urban and resort upper upscale hotels, our acquisition program is aimed at generating attractive risk-adjusted returns on our investment dollars, and therefore we may target lodging assets outside of the typical branded, urban, upper upscale and resort profile represented by our Existing Portfolio in order to capitalize on opportunities which may arise. We intend to select the brandings and operators for our hotels that we believe will lead to the highest returns. Additionally, the scope

Table of Contents

of our acquisitions program may include large hotel portfolios or hotel loans. Future acquisitions, if any, may be funded with cash on hand, by our issuance of additional debt or equity securities, including our common and preferred OP units provided that our stock price is at an attractive level, by draws on our $400.0 million senior unsecured credit facility, or by proceeds received from sales of existing assets.

Dispositions. We have from time to time divested of assets that no longer fit our target profile, will not offer long-term returns in excess of our cost of capital, will achieve a sale price in excess of our internal valuation, or that have high risk relative to their anticipated returns. In June 2017, we sold the 199-room Marriott Park City for net proceeds of $27.0 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $1.2 million. In February 2017, we sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach for net proceeds of $122.8 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. In May 2016, we sold the 203-room Sheraton Cerritos for net proceeds of $41.2 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $18.2 million. None of these sales represented a strategic shift that had a major impact on our business plan or our primary markets; therefore, none of these sales qualified as a discontinued operation.

Renovations. We invested $81.5 million and $139.8 million in capital improvements to our hotel portfolio during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Consistent with our strategy, during the first nine months of 2017 and 2016, we undertook major renovations, repositionings and ordinary course rooms, restaurants and public space renovations. Year-to-date, none of our 2017 renovations caused material room revenue disruption; however, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 our repositioning of the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort caused room revenue disruption of approximately $3.1 million and $6.5 million, respectively, all of which was in line with our expectations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the periods presented, our sources of cash included our operating activities and working capital, as well as proceeds from our sales of the Three Sold Hotels, sales of other assets, our term loan agreement drawn in January 2016, our Senior Notes, our ATM common stock issuances and our preferred stock offering. Our primary uses of cash were for capital expenditures for hotels, operating expenses, acquisitions of a hotel and other assets, repayment of notes payable, dividends and distributions on our common and preferred stock and distributions to our joint venture partner. We cannot be certain that traditional sources of funds will be available in the future.

Operating activities. Our net cash provided by or used in operating activities fluctuates primarily as a result of changes in RevPAR and the operating cash flow of our hotels. Our net cash provided by or used in operating activities may also be affected by changes in our portfolio resulting from hotel acquisitions, dispositions or renovations. Net cash provided by operating activities was $234.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to $228.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The net increase to cash provided by operating activities during the first nine months of 2017 was primarily due to increased cash generated by our hotels, most significantly at the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning, partially offset by decreased cash generated due to our sales of the Three Sold Hotels.

Investing activities. Our net cash provided by or used in investing activities fluctuates primarily as a result of acquisitions, dispositions and renovations of hotels. Net cash used in investing activities during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the first nine months of 2016 was as follows (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
Proceeds from sales of assets	$	150,171	$	41,202
Restricted cash — replacement reserve		(7,496)		(8,914)
Acquisition of hotel property and other assets		(173,917)		(2,447)
Renovations and additions to hotel properties		(81,470)		(139,846)
Payment for interest rate derivative		(19)		—
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(112,731)	$	(110,005)

Net cash used in investing activities was $112.7 million during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to $110.0 million for the same period in 2016. During the first nine months of 2017, we received proceeds of $150.2 million from our sales of the Marriott Park City, the Fairmont Newport Beach and surplus FF&E, along with the earn-out proceeds received related to the sale of the Royal Palm Miami Beach. These cash inflows were offset as we increased our restricted cash replacement reserve accounts by $7.5 million, paid $173.9 million to purchase the Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina, paid $81.5 million for renovations and additions to our portfolio and paid $19,000 for an interest rate cap agreement on our variable-rate mortgage secured by the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.

During the first nine months of 2016, we received proceeds of $41.2 million from our sales of the Sheraton Cerritos and surplus FF&E. These cash inflows were offset as we increased our restricted cash replacement reserve accounts by $8.9 million, paid $2.4 million to acquire the air rights at our Renaissance Harborplace and paid $139.8 million for renovations and additions to our portfolio.

Table of Contents

Financing activities. Our net cash provided by or used in financing activities fluctuates primarily as a result of our issuance of common stock, our issuance and repayment of notes payable and our credit facility, and our issuance and redemption of other forms of capital, including preferred equity. Net cash used in financing activities during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to the first nine months of 2016 was as follows (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings	$	—	$	190,000
Payment of preferred stock offering costs		—		(6,640)
Redemption of preferred stock		—		(115,000)
Proceeds from common stock offerings		79,407		—
Payment of common stock offering costs		(1,475)		—
Repurchase of common stock for employee withholding obligations		(3,793)		(2,641)
Proceeds from notes payable		240,000		100,000
Payments on notes payable		(183,796)		(196,504)
Payments of costs related to extinguishment of notes payable		(1)		(153)
Payments of deferred financing costs		(13)		(85)
Dividends and distributions paid		(148,540)		(213,453)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest		(6,325)		(5,988)
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(24,536)	$	(250,464)

Net cash used in financing activities was $24.5 million during the first nine months of 2017 as compared to $250.5 million for the same period in 2016. During the first nine months of 2017, we received net proceeds of $77.9 million from the issuance of our common stock, and $240.0 million from the Senior Notes. These cash inflows were offset by the following cash outflows: $3.8 million paid to repurchase common shares to satisfy the tax obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted common shares issued to employees; $183.8 million in principal payments on our notes payable, including $176.0 million for the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf and $7.8 million in principal payments on our notes payable; $14,000 in combined loan extinguishment costs related to the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf and deferred financing costs related to our Senior Notes and our credit facility; $148.5 million in dividends and distributions to our common and preferred stockholders; and $6.3 million in distributions to the noncontrolling interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.

During the first nine months of 2016, we received $183.4 million in net proceeds from our preferred stock offerings, including $111.0 million from the issuance of our Series E preferred stock and $72.4 million from the issuance of our Series F preferred stock, and $100.0 million in proceeds received from our unsecured term loan. These cash inflows were offset by the following cash outflows: $115.0 million paid to redeem our Series D preferred stock; $2.6 million paid to repurchase common shares to satisfy the tax obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted common shares issued to employees; $196.5 million in principal payments on our notes payable, including $114.2 million for the loan secured by the Boston Park Plaza, $72.6 million for the loan secured by the Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld® and $9.7 million in principal payments on our notes payable; $0.2 million in costs paid to extinguish the loan secured by Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®; $0.1 million in deferred financing costs related to our new $100.0 million unsecured term loan; $213.5 million in dividends and distributions to our common and preferred stockholders; and $6.0 million in distributions to the noncontrolling interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.

Future. We expect our primary uses of cash to be for operating expenses, capital investments in our hotels, repayment of principal on our notes payable and credit facility, interest expense, dividends and distributions on our common and preferred stock, potential repurchases of our common stock, potential purchases of debt in other hotels, and acquisitions of hotels, including possibly hotel portfolios. We expect our primary sources of cash will continue to be our operating activities, working capital, notes payable and our credit facility, dispositions of hotel properties, and proceeds from public and private offerings of debt securities and common and preferred stock. Our financial objectives include the maintenance of our credit ratios, appropriate levels of liquidity and continued balance sheet strength. Consistent with maintaining our low leverage and balance sheet strength, in the near-term, we expect to fund future acquisitions, if any, largely through cash on hand, the issuance of common or preferred equity, provided that our stock price is at an attractive level, or by proceeds received from sales of existing assets in order to selectively grow the quality and scale of our portfolio. Our ability to raise funds through the issuance of equity securities depends on, among other things, general market conditions for hotel companies and REITs and market perceptions about us. We will continue to analyze alternate sources of capital in an effort to minimize our capital costs and maximize our financial flexibility, including pursuant to the ATM agreements we entered into in February 2017. Under the terms of the agreements, we may issue and sell from time to time through or to the managers, as sales agents and/or principals, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering amount of up to $300.0 million. Through September 30, 2017, we have received $77.9 million in net proceeds from the issuance of 4,876,855 shares of our common stock in connection with the ATM Agreements, leaving $220.6 million available for sale under the ATM Agreements. However, when needed, the capital markets may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all.

Table of Contents

Cash Balance. As of September 30, 2017, our unrestricted cash balance was $466.5 million. By minimizing our need to access external capital by maintaining higher than typical cash balances, our financial security and flexibility are meaningfully enhanced because we are able to fund our business needs (including payment of cash distributions on our common stock, if declared) and near-term debt maturities with our cash on hand. Our unrestricted cash balance includes the net proceeds received on the sales of the Marriott Park City and the Fairmont Newport Beach in 2017, a portion of which may be required to satisfy our 2017 ordinary and capital gain REIT distribution requirements.

Debt. As of September 30, 2017, we had $992.1 million of consolidated debt, $538.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, and total assets of $3.9 billion. We believe that by controlling debt levels, staggering maturity dates and maintaining a highly flexible capital structure, we can maintain lower capital costs than more highly leveraged companies, or companies with limited flexibility due to restrictive corporate-level financial covenants.

The weighted average term to maturity of our debt as of September 30, 2017 is approximately 5 years, and 77.8% of our debt, including the effects of interest rate swap agreements, is fixed rate with a weighted average interest rate of 4.5%. Including our variable-rate debt obligation based on the variable rate at September 30, 2017, the weighted average interest rate on our debt is 4.3%.

As of September 30, 2017, all of our outstanding debt had fixed interest rates or had been swapped to fixed interest rates, except the $219.9 million non-recourse mortgage on the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, which is subject to an interest rate cap agreement that caps the interest rate at 4.25% until May 2019. Our mortgage debt is in the form of single asset non-recourse loans rather than cross-collateralized multi-property pools. In addition to our mortgage debt, as of September 30, 2017, we have two unsecured corporate-level term loans as well as the Senior Notes. We currently believe this structure is appropriate for the operating characteristics of our business as it isolates risk and provides flexibility for various portfolio management initiatives, including the sale of individual hotels subject to existing debt.

Each of our 2017 year-to-date debt transactions is discussed below.

In January 2017, we received proceeds of $240.0 million in a private placement of the Senior Notes. The private placement consisted of the Series A Senior Notes, which includes $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026, and the Series B Senior Notes, which includes $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028.

We may in the future seek to obtain mortgages on one or all of our 22 unencumbered hotels, 15 of which are currently held by subsidiaries whose interests are pledged to our credit facility. Our 22 unencumbered hotels include: Boston Park Plaza; Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles; Embassy Suites Chicago; Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile; Hilton New Orleans St. Charles; Hilton North Houston; Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile; Hyatt Regency Newport Beach; Hyatt Regency San Francisco; Marriott Boston Long Wharf; Marriott Houston; Marriott Philadelphia; Marriott Portland; Marriott Quincy; Marriott Tysons Corner; Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina; Renaissance Harborplace; Renaissance Long Beach; Renaissance Los Angeles Airport; Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®; Renaissance Westchester; and Wailea Beach Resort. Should we obtain secured financing on any or all of our unencumbered hotels, the amount of capital available through our credit facility may be reduced.

Contractual Obligations. The following table summarizes our payment obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2017 (in thousands):


	Payment due by period
				Less Than		1 to 3		3 to 5		More than
	Total		1 year			years		years		5 years
Notes payable	$	992,149	$		10,431	$	232,896	$	276,748	$	472,074
Interest obligations on notes payable (1)		237,165			42,796		76,907		52,314		65,148
Capital lease obligations (2)		26,757			1		3		3		26,750
Interest obligations on capital leases		124,419			2,356		4,711		4,815		112,537
Operating lease obligations		282,119			9,334		18,300		18,334		236,151
Construction commitments		54,156			54,156		—		—		—
Employment obligations		1,489			1,489		—		—		—
Total	$	1,718,254	$		120,563	$	332,817	$	352,214	$	912,660

(1)

Interest on our variable rate debt obligation is calculated based on the variable rate at September 30, 2017, and includes the effect of our interest rate derivative agreements.

Table of Contents

(2)

Includes two leases which have been classified as capital leases: the building lease at the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile; and the ground lease at the Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles. Principal amounts for the Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles lease are accreting up to the future purchase right option of approximately $15.4 million (calculated as of the lease inception date), which option the Company expects to exercise when available in September 2037.

Capital Expenditures and Reserve Funds

We believe we maintain each of our hotels in good repair and condition and in general conformity with applicable franchise and management agreements, ground, building and air leases, and laws and regulations. Our capital expenditures primarily relate to the ongoing maintenance of our hotels and are budgeted in the reserve accounts described in the following paragraph. We also incur capital expenditures for cyclical renovations, hotel repositionings and development. We invested $81.5 million in our portfolio during the first nine months of 2017. As of September 30, 2017, we have contractual construction commitments totaling $54.2 million. If we renovate or develop additional hotels in the future, our capital expenditures will likely increase.

With respect to our hotels that are operated under management or franchise agreements with major national hotel brands and for all of our hotels subject to first mortgage liens, we are obligated to maintain an FF&E reserve account for future planned and emergency-related capital expenditures at these hotels. The amount funded into each of these reserve accounts is determined pursuant to the management, franchise and loan agreements for each of the respective hotels, ranging between zero and 5.0% of the respective hotel’s total annual revenue. As of September 30, 2017, our balance sheet includes restricted cash of $69.7 million, which was held in FF&E reserve accounts for future capital expenditures at the majority of our 27 hotels. According to certain loan agreements, reserve funds are to be held by the lenders or managers in restricted cash accounts, and we are not required to spend the entire amount in such reserve accounts each year.

Seasonality and Volatility

As is typical of the lodging industry, we experience some seasonality in our business as indicated in the table below. Revenue for certain of our hotels is generally affected by seasonal business patterns (e.g., the first quarter is strong in Orlando, the second quarter is strong for the Mid-Atlantic business hotels, and the fourth quarter is strong for New York City and Hawaii). Quarterly revenue also may be adversely affected by renovations and repositionings, our managers’ effectiveness in generating business and by events beyond our control, such as extreme weather conditions, terrorist attacks or alerts, civil unrest, public health concerns, airline strikes or reduced airline capacity, economic factors and other considerations affecting travel. Revenues for our 26 hotel Comparable Portfolio by quarter for 2016 and 2017 were as follows (dollars in thousands):


	First			Second			Third			Fourth
Revenues	Quarter			Quarter			Quarter			Quarter			Total
2016:
Total revenues	$	274,292		$	322,160		$	303,304		$	289,584		$	1,189,340
Sold hotel revenues (1)		(15,773)			(11,667)			(11,210)			(9,466)			(48,116)
Non-hotel revenues (2)		(121)			(99)			210			(5,066)			(5,076)
Total Comparable Portfolio revenues (3)	$	258,398		$	310,394		$	292,304		$	275,052		$	1,136,148
Quarterly Comparable Portfolio revenues as a percentage of total annual revenues		22.7	%		27.3	%		25.8	%		24.2	%		100.0	%

2017:
Total revenues	$	280,743		$	318,796		$	303,909
Non-comparable hotel revenues (4)		—			—			(1,848)
Sold hotel revenues (1)		(8,737)			(1,244)			—
Non-hotel revenues (2)		(18)			(22)			(22)
Total Comparable Portfolio revenues (3)	$	271,988		$	317,530		$	302,039

(1)

Sold hotel revenues include those generated by the Sheraton Cerritos, the Fairmont Newport Beach and the Marriott Park City, which we sold in May 2016, February 2017 and June 2017, respectively.

(2)

Non-hotel revenues include the amortization of favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts received in conjunction with our acquisitions of the Boston Park Plaza, the Hilton Garden Inn Downtown/Magnificent Mile, the Hilton New Orleans St. Charles, the Hyatt Regency San Francisco and the Wailea Beach Resort.

(3)

Total Comparable Portfolio revenues include those generated by our 26 hotel Comparable Portfolio.

(4)

Non-comparable hotel revenues include those generated by the newly-developed Oceans Edge Hotel & Marina, which opened in January 2017 and was acquired by the Company in July 2017.

Table of Contents

Inflation

Inflation may affect our expenses, including, without limitation, by increasing such costs as labor, food, taxes, property and casualty insurance and utilities.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience, information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Impairment of long-lived assets. We periodically review each property for possible impairment. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. We perform a Level 3 analysis of fair value, using a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of our properties taking into account each property’s expected cash flow from operations, holding period and proceeds from the disposition of the property. The factors addressed in determining estimated proceeds from disposition include anticipated operating cash flow in the year of disposition and terminal capitalization rate. Our judgment is required in determining the discount rate applied to estimated cash flows, growth rate of the properties, operating income of the properties, the need for capital expenditures, as well as specific market and economic conditions.

Acquisition related assets and liabilities. Accounting for the acquisition of a hotel property or other entity as a business combination requires an allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the transaction at their respective estimated fair values. The most difficult estimations of individual fair values are those involving long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, intangible assets and capital lease obligations that are assumed as part of the acquisition of a leasehold interest. When we acquire a hotel property or other entity as a business combination, we use all available information to make these fair value determinations, and engage independent valuation specialists to assist in the fair value determinations of the long-lived assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Due to the inherent subjectivity in determining the estimated fair value of long-lived assets, we believe that the recording of acquired assets and liabilities is a critical accounting policy.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful life of our assets. The life of the assets is based on a number of assumptions, including the cost and timing of capital expenditures to maintain and refurbish our hotels, as well as specific market and economic conditions. Hotel properties and other investments are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives primarily ranging from five to 35 years for buildings and improvements and three to 12 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. While we believe our estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income or the gain or loss on the sale of any of our hotels. We have not changed the estimated useful lives of any of our assets during the periods discussed.

Income Taxes. We have elected to be treated as a REIT pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”). Our management believes that we have qualified and intend to continue to qualify as a REIT. Therefore, we are permitted to deduct distributions paid to our stockholders, eliminating the federal taxation of income represented by such distributions at the company level. REITs are subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on taxable income at regular corporate tax rates.

With respect to taxable subsidiaries, we account for income taxes in accordance with the Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC. Accordingly, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

The Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC addresses how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the financial statements. The guidance requires the accounting and disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing our tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not

Table of Contents

threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Our management is required to analyze all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations, for all major jurisdictions, which includes federal and certain states.

We record income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for net operating loss, capital loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted income tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. The effect on the deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the new rate is enacted. However, we must assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets, and, therefore, we recognize deferred tax assets only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of all available evidence, including the future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax planning strategies. If sufficient negative evidence exists such that deferred tax assets cannot be realized, the provision for taxes is increased by recording a reserve, in the form of a valuation allowance, against the estimated deferred tax assets that will not ultimately be realized.

Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

To the extent that we incur debt with variable interest rates, our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We have no derivative financial instruments held for trading purposes. We use derivative financial instruments, which are intended to manage interest rate risks.

As of September 30, 2017, 77.8% of our debt obligations are fixed in nature, which largely mitigates the effect of changes in interest rates on our cash interest payments. If the market rate of interest on our variable rate debt increases or decreases by 100 basis points, interest expense would increase or decrease, respectively, our future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.0 million based on the variable rate at September 30, 2017. After adjusting for the noncontrolling interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, this increase or decrease in interest expense would increase or decrease, respectively, our future earnings and cash flows by $1.5 million, based on the variable rates at September 30, 2017.

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During our fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates, there has not occurred any change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

None.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c)Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities:


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number (or Appropriate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1, 2017 — July 31, 2017	—	—	—
August 1, 2017 — August 31, 2017	—	—	—
September 1, 2017 — September 30, 2017	—	—	—
Total	—	—	—		$ 300,000,000	(1)

(1)

On February 17, 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of the Company’s common and preferred stock. As of September 30, 2017, no shares of either the Company’s common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including the Company’s capital needs, as well as the Company’s common and preferred stock price.

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5.Other Information

None.

Table of Contents

Item 6.Exhibits

The following Exhibits are filed as a part of this report:


Exhibit Number			Description
3.1			Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registration statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-117141) filed by the Company).

3.2			Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q, filed by the Company on August 5, 2008).

3.2.1			First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., effective as of March 19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 22, 2012).

3.2.2			Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., effective as of February 13, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Form 10-K, filed by the Company on February 19, 2015).

3.2.3			Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., effective as of February 17, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on February 21, 2017).

3.3			Articles Supplementary Prohibiting the Company From Electing to be Subject to Section 3-803 of the Maryland General Corporation Law Absent Shareholder Approval (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on April 29, 2013).

3.4			Articles Supplementary for Series E preferred stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the registration statement on Form 8-A, filed by the Company on March 10, 2016).

3.5			Articles Supplementary for Series F preferred stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the registration statement on Form 8-A, filed by the Company on May 16, 2016).

10.1			Fifth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on May 17, 2016).

31.1			Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2			Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1			Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS			XBRL Instance Document *

101.SCH			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document *

101.CAL			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document *

101.LAB			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document *

101.PRE			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document *

101.DEF			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document *

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the following materials, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; and (v) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.

Date: November 1, 2017	By:	/s/ Bryan A. Giglia
		Bryan A. Giglia (Chief Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)