SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.      )

 

Filed by the Registrant    x                              Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    o

Check the appropriate box:

 

BancFirst Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

 

 

---

 

BancFirst Corporation

101 North Broadway

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

April 15, 2015

PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND MAIL IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE.

 

---

 

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

BANCFIRST CORPORATION

2015 ANNUAL MEETING

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

---

 

 

 

---

 

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

BancFirst Corporation

101 North Broadway

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

We are providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of BancFirst Corporation of proxies to be used at our 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  In this proxy statement, we refer to the Board of Directors as the “Board”, to BancFirst Corporation as “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” and to our wholly-owned subsidiary, BancFirst as the “Bank.” This proxy statement, the accompanying proxy card or voter instruction card and our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10−K were first mailed to shareholders on or about April 21, 2015.  This proxy statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the Annual Meeting.  Please read it carefully.

ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

What matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

You will be voting on:

What are the Board’s recommendations?

The Board recommends a vote:

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

The Board set April 9, 2015 as the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “record date”).  You are entitled to vote if you were a shareholder of record of our common stock as of the close of business on April 9, 2015.  Your shares can be voted at the Annual Meeting only if you are present in person or represented by a valid proxy.

How many votes do I have?

You will have one vote for each share of our common stock you owned at the close of business on the record date, provided those shares are either held directly in your name as the shareholder of record or were held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, bank or other nominee.

What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and beneficial owner?

Most of our shareholders hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Shareholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, BancFirst Trust and Investment Management, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by the Company.  As the shareholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.  If this is the case, we have enclosed a proxy card for you to use.

1

---

 

Beneficial Owner. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or nominee, who is considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares.  As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote and are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting.  However, since you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting, unless you request, complete and deliver a proxy from your broker, bank or nominee. Your broker, bank or nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker, bank or nominee how to vote your shares.

What will happen if I do not vote my shares?

Shareholders of Record. If you are the shareholder of record of your shares and you do not vote by proxy card or in person at the Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners. If you are the beneficial owner of your shares, your broker or nominee may vote your shares only on those proposals on which it has discretion to vote. If no voting instructions are provided, these record holders can vote your shares only on discretionary, or routine, matters and not on non-discretionary, or non-routine, matters. Uninstructed shares whose votes cannot be counted on non-routine matters result in what are commonly referred to as “broker non-votes.”

If you do not give your broker voting instructions, your broker will not be entitled to vote your shares on Proposal 1.  We urge you to provide instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee so that your votes may be counted on all of these important matters.

How many votes can be cast by all shareholders?

Each share of BancFirst Corporation common stock is entitled to one vote.  There is no cumulative voting.  We had 15,517,463 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the record date.

How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

A majority of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the record date must be present at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a “quorum.” Shares that are present and entitled to vote on one or more of the matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting are counted as present for establishing a quorum.  Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.  If a quorum is not present, we expect that the Annual Meeting will be adjourned until we obtain a quorum.

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

Proposal 1: Election of 20 Directors

The election of directors requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the issued and outstanding common stock. Each director nominee who receives at least a majority of the common stock outstanding will be elected as a director for the ensuing one year. Any shares that are not voted (whether by abstention or broker non-vote) will have the effect of a vote against this proposal.

Proposal 2: Ratification of the selection of BKD, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015

This proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and eligible to vote.

Can I change or revoke my vote after I return my proxy card or voting instruction card?

Yes.  Even if you sign the proxy card or voting instruction card in the form accompanying this proxy statement, you retain the power to revoke your proxy or change your vote. You can revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before it is exercised by giving written notice specifying such revocation to the Secretary of the Company.  You may change your vote by timely delivery of a valid, later-dated proxy or by voting by ballot at the Annual Meeting.  However, please note that if you would like to vote at the Annual Meeting and you are not the shareholder of record, you must request, complete and deliver a proxy from your broker, bank or nominee.

2

---

 

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy or voting instruction card?

It generally means your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account.  Please provide voting instructions for all proxy and voting instruction cards you receive.

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

All shareholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend.

The Annual Meeting will be held at the Venetian Room, Skirvin Hilton Hotel, 1 Park Avenue (the corner of Park Avenue and Broadway), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102.

Who pays for the proxy solicitation and how will the Company solicit votes?

We will bear the expense of printing and mailing proxy materials.  In addition to this solicitation of proxies by mail, our directors, officers and other employees may solicit proxies by personal interview, telephone, facsimile or email. They will not be paid any additional compensation for such solicitation.  We will request brokers, banks and nominees who hold shares of our common stock in their names to furnish proxy materials to beneficial owners of the shares.  We will reimburse such brokers, banks and nominees for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners.

How can I access the Company’s proxy materials and annual report electronically?

The proxy statement and our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10−K are available on the BancFirst website at http://www.BancFirst.com and the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) at http://www.sec.gov.  The Company provides these documents on its website and also provides links to the SEC’s website where these reports can be obtained.  The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (other than the exhibits thereto), as well as copies of other filings or exhibits to filings made with the SEC, is also available without charge upon written request.  Such requests should be directed to: Randy Foraker, Executive Vice President and Secretary, BancFirst Corporation, 101 North Broadway, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102.  The public may read and copy any materials that the Company files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.  The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

Is a list of shareholders available?

The names of shareholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available to shareholders entitled to vote at this meeting for ten days prior to the meeting for any purpose relevant to the meeting.  This list can be viewed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., local time, at our principal executive offices at 101 N. Broadway, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.  Please contact Randy Foraker, Executive Vice President and Secretary, BancFirst Corporation, 101 North Broadway, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, to make arrangements.

How do I find out the voting results?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting, and final voting results will be published within four business days of the annual meeting on Form 8-K, which we will file with the SEC.  After the Form 8-K is filed, you may obtain a copy by visiting our website, which provides links to the SEC’s website.  You may also obtain a copy by visiting the SEC’s website directly or by contacting Randy Foraker, Executive Vice President and Secretary, by calling (405) 270-1044, by writing to Mr. Foraker c/o BancFirst Corporation, 101 N. Broadway, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, or by sending an email to him at rforaker@bancfirst.com.

What if I have questions about lost stock certificates or I need to change my mailing address?

Shareholders of record may contact our transfer agent, BancFirst Trust and Investment Management, by calling (405) 270-4797 or writing to BancFirst Trust and Investment Management, P.O. Box 26883, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73126, to get more information about these matters.

3

---

 

HOW DO I VOTE?

Your vote is important.  You may vote by mail or attend the Annual Meeting and vote by ballot, all as described below.

Vote by Mail

If you choose to vote by mail, simply mark your proxy card or voting instruction card, sign and date it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

Voting at the Annual Meeting

The method or timing of your vote will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you attend the meeting and vote in person.  However, if your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting.  You should allow yourself enough time prior to the Annual Meeting to obtain this proxy from the holder of record.

The shares represented by the proxy cards or voting instruction cards received, properly marked, signed, dated and not revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting.  If you sign and return your proxy card but do not give voting instructions, the shares represented by that proxy card will be voted as recommended by the Board.  If you fail to return your proxy card, or if your shares are held in “street name” and you do not instruct your broker how to vote your shares by failing to complete the voting instruction card, the effect will be as though you cast a vote “against” Proposal 1.

MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF 20 DIRECTORS

Our Board currently consists of 20 members. At the recommendation of the Independent Directors’ Committee, the Board has nominated the 20 director nominees identified in this Proposal 1 to serve a one-year term, until the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal. For additional information about the director nominees and their qualifications, see “Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters—Directors of BancFirst Corporation.”  All of the nominees are current directors of the Company.  The nominees for the election of directors at the Annual Meeting are as follows:

 

4

---

 

Unless otherwise specified in the proxy, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote the shares represented by each properly executed proxy for the election of these nominees as directors of the Company.  The nominees have agreed to stand for election and, if elected, to serve as directors. However, if any person nominated by the Board is unable or unwilling to serve, the proxies will be voted for the election of such other person or persons as the Independent Directors’ Committee and the Board may recommend.

The sections in this proxy statement entitled “Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters—Directors of BancFirst Corporation” and “—Stock Ownership” provide certain information about each nominee based on data submitted by such persons, including the principal occupation of such person for at least the last five years and any public company directorships held by such person.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, is required for the election of each nominee as a director of the Company.  Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of the nominees to the Board.  Proxies solicited by the Board will be voted for each of the nominees unless instructions to withhold or to the contrary are given.

PROPOSAL 2

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

BKD, LLP (“BKD”) was the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2014 and has been approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of BancFirst Corporation (the “Audit Committee”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.  Representatives of BKD are expected to attend the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement or to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders. BKD has advised the Company that they are independent with respect to the Company.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit services and non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also considers whether such services are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence and considers whether our independent registered public accounting firm is positioned to provide us with effective and efficient audit services needed to properly manage risk or improve audit quality. In its review of any non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, the possible effect of the performance of such services on the auditor’s independence.  No non-audit services were performed by BKD during 2014 or 2013. The Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of audit fees and audit-related fees during the year ended December 31, 2014.

The following table shows the fees billed for the audit provided by BKD during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

 

Audit Fees for professional services rendered by BKD include fees related to the audits of the Company and of certain of our subsidiaries, other attestation services, internal control audits and assistance with interpretation of accounting standards.

 

Additional information concerning the Audit Committee and its activities with BKD can be found in the following sections of this proxy statement: “Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters—Audit Committee” and “Audit Committee Report.”

Information Regarding Change of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

On August 22, 2013, the Audit Committee dismissed Grant Thornton, LLP (“Grant Thornton”), the Company’s prior independent registered public accounting firm, after conducting a comprehensive, competitive process to select the independent registered public

5

---

 

accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2013. The Audit Committee invited four accounting firms to participate in this process, including Grant Thornton, LLP. As a result of this process and following careful deliberation, on August 22, 2013, the Audit Committee engaged BKD as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2013. Grant Thornton was notified of its dismissal on the same date.

Grant Thornton’s reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. The audit reports of Grant Thornton on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 and 2012 did not contain an adverse opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, and the subsequent period through August 22, 2013, there were (i) no “disagreements” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, between the Company and Grant Thornton on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, any of which that, if not resolved to Grant Thornton’s satisfaction, would have caused Grant Thornton to make reference to the subject matter in its reports for such years and (ii) no reportable events within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K during the two most recent fiscal years or the subsequent interim period.

The Company provided Grant Thornton with a copy of the disclosures it made on its Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 22, 2013. The Company requested that Grant Thornton furnish a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the statements made therein. A copy of Grant Thornton’s letter dated August 26, 2013 is attached as Exhibit 16.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 22, 2013, stating its agreement with such statements.

 

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, and the subsequent interim period through August 22, 2013, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted with BKD regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the Company that BKD concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, or (iii) any reportable event within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Grant Thornton had advised the Company that they were independent with respect to the Company.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and eligible to vote is required for the approval of this proposal.

 

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of BKD as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for 2015. Proxies solicited by the Board will be voted for the proposal unless contrary instructions are given.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND BOARD MATTERS

The Company is committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance, which we believe are essential to running our business efficiently, serving our shareholders well and maintaining our integrity in the marketplace.  We regularly monitor developments in the area of corporate governance and review our processes and procedures in light of such developments.  In those efforts, we review federal laws affecting corporate governance, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules adopted by the SEC and NASDAQ.  We believe that we have in place procedures and practices, including the following, which are designed to enhance our shareholders’ interests.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer and senior financial officers, including our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, the purpose of which is to promote honest and ethical conduct and compliance with the law, particularly as related to the maintenance of the Company’s financial books and records and the preparation of its financial statements.  We have also adopted a Corporate Code of Conduct that sets forth the guiding principles and rules of behavior by which we operate our company and conduct our daily business with our customers, vendors and shareholders and with our fellow employees.  

6

---

 

The Code of Conduct applies to all directors and employees of the Company.  Copies of the Code of Ethics and the Corporate Code of Conduct may be requested from the Secretary at the address on the cover of this proxy statement.

Director Independence

The NASDAQ’s listing standards require our Board to be comprised of at least a majority of independent directors.  For a director to be considered independent, the Board must determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with the Company.  Based on the independence standards prescribed by NASDAQ, our Board has affirmatively determined that each of the following directors is independent:  C. L. Craig, Jr., F. Ford Drummond, Dr. Donald B. Halverstadt, Dave R. Lopez, J. Ralph McCalmont, Tom H. McCasland III, Ronald J. Norick, Paul B. Odom, Jr., Natalie Shirley, Michael K. Wallace, Gregory Wedel and G. Rainey Williams, Jr.  In addition, as prescribed by the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, these independent directors have at least one scheduled meeting without management present.  See “Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters —Independent Directors’ Committee.”

In determining independence, the Board reviews whether directors have any material relationship with the Company.  The Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances.  In assessing the materiality of a director's relationship to the Company, the Board considers the issues from the director's standpoint and from the perspective of the persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation and is guided by the standards set forth below.  The Board reviews commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships.  An independent director must not have any material relationship with the Company, directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company, or any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

A director will not be considered independent in the following circumstances:

For these purposes, an “immediate family member” includes a director's spouse, parents, children, siblings, mother-and father-in-law, sons-and daughters-in-law, brothers-and sisters-in-law, and anyone who shares the director's home.

Director Nominees

Director Qualifications

The Independent Directors’ Committee has no specified Board membership criteria that apply to nominees recommended for a position on the Company’s Board.  However, members of the Board should have the highest professional and personal ethics and values, consistent with the Company’s longstanding values and standards.  They should also have broad experience at the policy-making level in business, government, education, technology or public service. In addition, directors should represent a diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds, experiences and other demographics. They should be committed to enhancing shareholder value and should have sufficient time to carry out their duties and to provide insight and practical wisdom based on experience.  The Independent Directors’ Committee believes that directors’ service on other boards of public companies should be limited to a number that permits them, given their individual circumstances, to perform responsibly all director duties.

7

---

 

Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for Directors

The Board Issues Committee assists the Independent Directors’ Committee in identifying director candidates. Candidates may come to the attention of the Board Issues Committee and the Independent Directors’ Committee through current Board member, shareholders or other persons. Identified candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Independent Directors’ Committee and may be considered at any point during the year.  As described below, the Independent Directors’ Committee will consider properly submitted shareholder recommendations for candidates for the Board to be included in the Company’s proxy statement. In making its nominations, the Independent Directors’ Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board.

Shareholder Recommendations

The policy of the Independent Directors’ Committee is to consider properly submitted shareholder recommendations of candidates for membership on the Board as described above under “Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for Directors.”  In evaluating any such recommendations, the Independent Directors’ Committee will consider the balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board and will address the membership criteria set forth above under “Director Qualifications.” Any shareholder recommendations proposed for consideration by the Independent Directors’ Committee should include the candidate's name and qualifications for Board membership and should be addressed to the Secretary pursuant to the procedure described under the heading “Proposals for the 2016 Meeting of Shareholders.”

8

---

 

Directors of BancFirst Corporation

The following information about each member of our Board of Directors, or nominee for director to our Board, includes their business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, and the experiences, qualifications attributes or skills that caused the Independent Directors’ Committee and our Board of Directors to determine that each individual should serve as one of our directors. The following information is current as of April 9, 2015:

 

9

---

 

10

---

 

11

---

 

 

 

 

12

---

 

Board Structure and Committee Composition

As of the date of this proxy statement, our Board has 20 directors and the following five standing committees: (1) Executive Committee, (2) Audit Committee, (3) Compensation Committee, (4) Independent Directors’ Committee, and (5) Board Issues Committee. The committee membership and meetings during the last fiscal year and the function of each of the standing committees are described below.  During fiscal 2014, the Board held 12 meetings.  Each current director attended at least 75% of all Board and applicable standing committee meetings.  Directors are encouraged to attend annual meetings of the Company’s shareholders.  All then-current directors with the exception of Tom H. McCasland III and Natalie Shirley attended the previous annual meeting of shareholders.

 

 

The Company’s senior leadership is shared between two positions — the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of the Board.  Separating these positions allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman of the Board to lead our Board in its fundamental role of oversight of management.  We believe that the separated role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer provides an appropriate balance between leadership and independent oversight.

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

The Board is charged with general oversight of the management of the Company’s risks. The Board considers risks, as appropriate, among other factors in reviewing the Company’s strategy, business plan, budgets and major transactions. Each of the Board’s committees assists the Board in overseeing the management of the Company’s risks within the areas delegated to the committee. In particular, the Executive Committee assists the Board by reviewing reports from management on at least an annual basis on the risks facing the Company, management’s actions to address those risks and the Company’s risk management processes. Following its reviews of the reports, the Executive Committee reports the results of its reviews to the full Board. The Audit Committee assists the Board with oversight of operational and compliance risk by reviewing internal audit reports from the Company’s Chief Internal Auditor. The Compensation Committee oversees risks related to the Company’s compensation programs and policies and meets at least annually with the Chief Executive Officer to discuss such risks. The Senior Loan Committee is responsible for the oversight of

13

---

 

credit risk, on which they report monthly to the board. The Administrative Committee assists the Board and executive management with the oversight of risks other than credit risk.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee has the authority to exercise all the powers of the full Board during the intervals between Board meetings, except the power to amend the Bylaws and those powers specifically delegated to other committees of the Board.  Members of the Executive Committee in 2014 were Dennis L. Brand, James R. Daniel, K. Gordon Greer (Chairman), David R. Harlow, David E. Rainbolt, H. E. Rainbolt and Darryl Schmidt.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of the Company also serves as the Audit Committee of the Bank.  The Audit Committee is responsible for conducting an annual examination of the Company and for ensuring that adequate internal controls and procedures are maintained.  An independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to conduct the annual examination and the Audit Committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm to discuss the scope and results of the examination.  The Chief Internal Auditor reports to the Audit Committee, and the Chief Risk Officer and EVP of Asset Quality meet with the Committee.

The Board determined that each of J. Ralph McCalmont, Chairman of the Audit Committee, and Audit Committee members Jimmie L. Cole, Tom H. McCasland III, Natalie Shirley and Gregory Wedel, is independent pursuant to applicable NASDAQ and Exchange Act rules.  The Board also determined that Mr. Cole and Mr. Wedel are audit committee financial experts as defined by applicable SEC rules.  The Audit Committee has a written Audit Committee Charter. The charter is not available on the Company’s website, but a copy was attached as Appendix D to the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held May 22, 2014.  A free printed copy also is available to any shareholder who requests it from the Secretary at the address on the cover of this Proxy Statement. The report of the Audit Committee is included herein under the heading “Audit Committee Report”.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee of the Company determines the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, and reviews and approves the compensation of the other executive officers of the Company.  During 2014, the Compensation Committee was composed of C. L. Craig, Jr. (Chairman), F. Ford Drummond, and G. Rainey Williams, Jr., each of whom has been determined by the Board to be independent directors under applicable NASDAQ and SEC standards. The report of the Compensation Committee is included herein under the heading “Compensation Committee Report”.  The Compensation Committee has a written charter. The charter is not available on the Company’s website, but a copy is included as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.  A free printed copy is available to any shareholder who requests it from the Secretary at the address on the cover of this Proxy Statement.

Independent Directors’ Committee

The Independent Directors’ Committee meets at least annually in executive session to discuss significant matters and review the actions of management of the Company, and also serves as the Board’s nominating committee.  The Independent Directors’ Committee consists of those directors who meet the applicable independence requirements, which during 2014 were C. L. Craig, Jr., F. Ford Drummond, Dr. Donald B. Halverstadt, Dave Lopez, J. Ralph McCalmont, Tom H. McCasland III, Ronald J. Norick, Paul B. Odom, Jr., Natalie Shirley, Michael K. Wallace and G. Rainey Williams, Jr. The Independent Directors’ Committee has a written charter. The charter is not available on the Company’s website, but a copy is included as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement. A free printed copy is available to any shareholder who requests it from the Secretary at the address on the cover of this Proxy Statement.

Executive sessions of independent directors are held at least once a year. The sessions are scheduled and chaired by the lead independent director, who in 2014 was G. Rainey Williams, Jr. Any independent director may request that an additional executive session be scheduled.

Board Issues Committee

The Board Issues Committee is a committee that considers matters regarding membership, processes, education, and compensation of the Board of Directors.  The Board Issues Committee makes recommendations regarding these matters to the Independent Directors Committee and the full Board, as appropriate. During 2014 the members of the Board Issues Committee were David E. Rainbolt, H.E. Rainbolt (Chairman) and G. Rainey Williams, Jr. (lead independent director). The Board Issues Committee met four times during 2014. The Board Issues Committee meets at least annually, but may meet more frequently as they consider necessary. The Board Issues Committee does not have a written charter.

14

---

 

Senior Loan Committee of the Bank

The Senior Loan Committee of the Bank is a management committee that assists the Board and executive management with the administration of corporate credit policies and procedures, and evaluates loans within its designated policy guidelines. During 2014 the members of the Senior Loan Committee were Dennis L. Brand, James R. Daniel, Roy C. Ferguson, K. Gordon Greer, David R. Harlow, David E. Rainbolt, H.E. Rainbolt and Darryl Schmidt (Chairman). The Senior Loan Committee generally met weekly during 2014.

Asset/Liability Committee of the Bank

The Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) of the Bank is a management committee that administers the corporate investment and asset/liability management policies and procedures, and manages the Bank’s liquidity, interest rate risk and market risk. At December 31, 2014, the members of the ALCO were Dennis L. Brand, Randy Foraker, Kevin Lawrence, Robert M. Neville, David E. Rainbolt (Chairman) and Darryl Schmidt.

Administrative Committee of the Bank

The Administrative Committee of the Bank is a management committee that assists the Board and executive management with administration of corporate policies and procedures, oversight of risks other than credit risk, and with other matters concerning the management of the Bank’s business.  During 2014, the members of the Administrative Committee were Dennis L. Brand, Scott Copeland, James R. Daniel, Paul D. Fleming, Randy Foraker, D. Jay Hannah, Kevin Lawrence, Robert M. Neville, Dale E. Petersen, David E. Rainbolt (Chairman), J. Michael Rogers, Darryl Schmidt and David Westman.  The Administrative Committee met 12 times during 2014.

Shareholder Communications with the Board

Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with one or more members of the Board in writing by regular mail. The following address may be used by those who wish to send such communications:

Board of Directors

c/o Secretary,

BancFirst Corporation

101 N. Broadway

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102

Such communication should be clearly marked “Shareholder-Board Communication.” The communication must indicate whether it is meant to be distributed to the entire Board or to specific members of the Board, and must state the number of shares beneficially owned by the shareholder making the communication. The Secretary has the authority to disregard any inappropriate communications.  If deemed an appropriate communication, the Secretary will submit your correspondence to the Chairman of the Board or to any specific director to whom the correspondence is directed.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

As previously stated, the Compensation Committee of the Company determines the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and reviews and approves the compensation of the other executive officers of the Company.  In connection with these duties, the Compensation Committee meets at least annually with the Chief Executive Officer to discuss, review and evaluate the relationship between our risk management policies and practices and executive compensation arrangements. This meeting includes a review of the structure and components of our compensation arrangements, the material potential sources of risk in our business lines and compensation arrangements and our various policies and practices that mitigate these risks.  Within this framework, a variety of topics are discussed, including the parameters of acceptable and excessive risk taking (recognizing that some risk taking is inherent part of operating any business) and the general business goals and concerns of the Company, including the need to attract, retain and motivate qualified executives and other personnel.

The Compensation Committee believes that our overall compensation practices for our executive officers, which include the following elements, limit the ability of executive officers to benefit from taking unnecessary or excessive risks:

15

---

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Executive Compensation”. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10−K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

C. L. Craig, Jr. (Chairman)

F. Ford Drummond

G. Rainey Williams, Jr.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Messrs. Craig, Drummond, and Williams currently serve on the Compensation Committee.  None of these individuals is or has been an officer or associate of the Company, or had any relationship with the Company required to be disclosed under “Transactions with Related Persons.”  No executive officer of the Company is, or was during 2014, a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of another company that has, or had during 2014 an executive officer serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The following report is for the Audit Committee’s activities regarding oversight of the Company’s financial reporting and auditing process for fiscal year 2014.

During 2014, the Audit Committee was comprised of J. Ralph McCalmont (Chairman), Jimmie L. Cole, Tom H. McCasland III and Natalie Shirley. Gregory Wedel was appointed to the Audit Committee in February 2015. All of the committee members are “independent directors” as defined in the Marketplace Rules of The NASDAQ Global Market.  Mr. Cole and Mr. Wedel have been designated as audit committee financial experts by the Board.  Mr. Cole is a nonvoting advisory director of the full Board, but is a voting member of the Audit Committee.  The Board has adopted an Audit Committee Charter, a copy of which was included as Appendix D to the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held May 22, 2014.  The composition of the Audit Committee, the attributes of its members and the responsibilities of the Committee, as reflected in its charter, are intended to be in accordance with applicable requirements for corporate audit committees.

As described more fully in its charter, the purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in its general oversight of the Company’s financial reporting, internal control and audit functions.  Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws and regulations.  The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles.

The Audit Committee is not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and the independent registered public accounting firm, nor can the Audit Committee certify that the independent registered public accounting firm is “independent” under applicable rules.  The Audit Committee serves a board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and the independent registered public accounting firm on the basis of the information it receives, discussions with management and the auditor, and the experience of the Committee’s members in business, financial and accounting matters.

16

---

 

Among other matters, the Audit Committee monitors the activities and performance of the Company’s internal and external auditors, including the audit scope, external audit fees, auditor independence matters and the extent to which the independent registered public accounting firm may be retained to perform non-audit services.  The Audit Committee and the Board have ultimate authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, when appropriate, replace the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also reviews the results of the internal and external audit work with regard to the adequacy and appropriateness of the Company’s financial, accounting and internal controls.  Management’s and the independent registered public accounting firm’s presentations to, and discussions with, the Audit Committee also cover various topics and events that may have significant financial impact or are the subject of discussions between management and the independent registered public accounting firm.  In addition, the Audit Committee generally oversees the Company’s internal compliance programs.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm.  Management represented to the Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the independent registered public accounting firm represented that its presentations to the Audit Committee included the matters required to be discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 16, (Communications with Audit Committees).

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm also provided the Audit Committee with a formal written statement describing all relationships between us and our auditors that might bear on the auditors’ independence consistent with Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526, “Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence.” The Audit Committee discussed with the auditors any relationships that may have an impact on their objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to the auditors’ independence.

Following the Audit Committee’s discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:

J. Ralph McCalmont (Chairman)

Jimmie L. Cole

Tom H. McCasland III

Natalie Shirley

Gregory Wedel

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

BancFirst has made loans in the ordinary course of business to certain directors and executive officers of the Company and to certain affiliates of these directors and executive officers.  None of these loans outstanding are classified as nonaccrual, past due, restructured or potential problem loans. All such loans were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans made to persons not related to the Company, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

We have adopted written policies to implement the requirements of Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Board, which restricts the extension of credit to directors and executive officers and their family members and other related interests.  Under these policies, extensions of credit that exceed regulatory thresholds must be approved by the Board of Directors of the Bank. All other transactions involving the Company in which a director or executive officer or immediate family member may have a direct or indirect material interest are required to be approved by the Audit Committee.

Director Michael S. Samis is Chairman of the Board and a 62% owner of Energy Financial Solutions, LLC (EFS), an energy derivatives services company that the Bank uses to provide energy hedging services to certain of its loan customers. The Bank serves as the clearing bank for settlement of the derivative contracts and remits to EFS its portion of the spread on the transactions, which is the compensation for its services. From January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, payments to EFS totaled $938,188. Mr. Samis’s interest in this gross revenue before expense, based on his ownership percentage of EFS, would be $581,677.

17

---

 

MANAGEMENT

Information with respect to our executive officers (including certain executive officers of BancFirst, our subsidiary bank) as of April 9, 2015 is set forth below.  Each officer serves a term of office of one year or until the election and qualification of his or her successor.

 

 

Each of the above-named executive officers has been employed by the Company for at least the last five years, with the exception of Kevin Lawrence, who joined the Company in 2013. Prior to such date and for at least the last five years, Mr. Lawrence was a Senior Manager for Ernst & Young, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Throughout this section, unless the context indicates otherwise, when we use the terms “we,” “our” or “us,” we are referring to BancFirst Corporation and its subsidiary BancFirst.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes the compensation for the named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table and for the Company’s executive officers generally.  SEC regulations require us to include our Chief Executive Officer, David E. Rainbolt (CEO), and our Interim Chief Financial Officer, Randy Foraker (Interim CFO), as named executive officers.  In addition, these regulations require us to include the three most highly compensated executive officers in 2014.  In addition to Messrs. Rainbolt and Foraker, our named executive officers are Dennis L. Brand, Darryl Schmidt and David R. Harlow.

Objectives of our Compensation Program

Overview

Our primary mission is to create long-term value for our shareholders consistent with our commitment to maintain the safety and soundness of the Bank. To accomplish this, we believe that BancFirst Corporation must provide competitive salaries and appropriate incentives to achieve long-term shareholder return. The Company’s executive compensation practices are designed to achieve four primary objectives:

18

---

 

Our goal is to effectively balance base salaries with short-term incentive compensation that is performance-based, and long-term compensation awards that are commensurate with an officer’s individual management responsibilities and potential for future contribution to corporate objectives. The portion of total compensation that is based on corporate performance and long-term shareholder return increases as an executive’s responsibilities increase.

The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving the Company’s overall compensation and benefit programs in consultation with David E. Rainbolt, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and for determining the compensation of the CEO. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving all option grants to executive officers. The CEO makes recommendations to the committee concerning his own compensation, but the CEO does not participate in the deliberations or decisions of the Compensation Committee concerning his compensation. The CEO determines the compensation, including salary, performance-based incentive pay and other awards, for other executive officers, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee.  While the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board of Directors the salary for the CEO, Mr. Rainbolt has in the past declined to accept certain raises.  However, in no case has his compensation exceeded the recommendation of the Committee.   The Compensation Committee currently consists of three directors, C.L. Craig, Jr. (Chairman), F. Ford Drummond and G. Rainey Williams, Jr., all of whom are independent under applicable NASDAQ and SEC standards.

Our Compensation Committee relies on various factors when determining our executive compensation policies, reviewing the performance of our named executive officers and establishing compensation levels and programs. These factors include an executive’s individual performance and contributions to our strategic objectives, recommendations from the CEO (for named executive officers other than himself), internal pay equity and the results of our 2014 “say-on-pay” vote, in which the advisory vote on our executive compensation program was approved with over 98% of the votes cast in favor of the resolution. The Compensation Committee also considers the performance of the management team as a group, the CEO’s assessment of other executives’ individual performance and the CEO’s compensation recommendations with respect to the other executive officers as part of its process. The Compensation Committee considered all of these factors, including the 2014 “say-on-pay” vote result, as it evaluated whether any changes to our executive compensation program were warranted and it determined that no changes were warranted at that time.

Executive Participation in Committee Discussions

The executive officers who participate in the Compensation Committee’s compensation-setting process are the CEO and the Executive Vice President for Human Resources. Executive participation is meant to provide the Compensation Committee with input regarding the Company’s compensation philosophy, process and decisions. In addition to providing factual information such as company-wide performance on relevant measures, these executives articulate management’s views on current compensation programs and processes, recommend relevant performance measures to be used for future awards, and otherwise supply information to assist the Compensation Committee. The CEO also provides information about individual performance assessments for the other named executive officers, and expresses to the Compensation Committee his view on the appropriate levels of compensation for the other named executive officers for the ensuing year. Additionally, the CEO discusses and reviews the alignment between the Company’s risk management policies and practices and all of the Company’s employee incentive compensation arrangements, identifying and making efforts to limit any features in such compensation arrangements that might lead to employees taking unnecessary or excessive risks that could threaten the value of the Company.

These two executives participate in committee discussions purely in an informational and advisory capacity, but have no vote in the committee’s decision-making process. The CEO does not attend those portions of Compensation Committee meetings during which his performance is evaluated or his compensation is being determined. No executive officer other than the CEO and Executive Vice President for Human Resources attends those portions of Compensation Committee meetings during which the performance of the other named executive officers is evaluated or their compensation is being determined.

Executive Compensation Program

The Company’s compensation structure primarily consists of the following components:

19

---

 

The Company considers market practices to achieve an overall compensation program that aims to provide a total compensation package for our executive officers that is generally competitive with the compensation paid to similarly situated executive and senior officers of comparable-sized financial institutions. The Company reviews the market practices by speaking to recruitment agencies and reviewing the data on financial institutions of similar size, growth potential and market area as reported in publicly available documents, such as proxy statements. Although the committee has not established a specific comparison group of bank holding companies for determination of compensation, those listed in the salary surveys that share one or more common traits with the Company, such as asset size, geographic location, and financial returns on assets and equity, are given more consideration. The Company does not employ formulas to determine the relationship of one element of compensation to another nor does it determine the amount of one form of compensation based solely on the amount of another form of compensation; however, the Company strives to allocate a significant portion of overall compensation to elements that focus on performance and incentives. The Company does not currently have a policy to recapture performance-based incentive pay or other compensation in the event that the metrics used to determine the compensation are later restated.

Base Salary

One of the objectives of our compensation program is to establish base salaries for executive officers that are competitive to those of comparable companies in our industry and our local market place. We do not seek to pay the highest base salaries in our peer group; however, we believe that base salaries should be sufficiently competitive to attract and retain talented senior management. We consult various sources to identify adequate and competitive base salary levels, including industry surveys, feedback from recruiters and information contained in publicly available documents. The base salary level for our CEO is established annually by the Compensation Committee. In setting Mr. Rainbolt’s base salary for 2014, the Compensation Committee followed this compensation policy. Mr. Rainbolt’s review was based on the factors above, including the current financial performance of the Bank as measured by earnings, asset growth, and overall financial soundness. Base salary for the other executive officers is established by our CEO, subject to review and approval by the Compensation Committee. In setting base salaries, our CEO considers the seniority and level of responsibility of each executive officer, taking into account competitive market compensation paid by other companies as described above. Salaries for executive officers are reviewed on an annual basis as well as at the time of a promotion or other change in level of responsibilities. Increases in base salary are based on the evaluation of factors such as the individual’s level of responsibility, performance and level of compensation. The salaries paid during fiscal year 2014 to the Company’s named executive officers are shown in the Summary Compensation Table.

Annual Performance-Based Incentive Pay

We believe that the payment of performance-based incentive compensation based on business and personal goals is important to focus our executive officers on the achievement of short-term corporate goals.  Accordingly, all of our executive officers are eligible to receive an annual cash amount based on our performance-based incentive program. The performance-based incentive program is designed to reward our executive officers for the attainment of short-term business and/or personal performance goals that are established at the beginning of each fiscal year, and can be in amounts ranging from 5% to 25% of the executive officer’s base salary.  Performance-based incentive compensation for our CEO is established by the Compensation Committee. Performance-based incentive compensation for our other executive officers is established by our CEO, subject to review and approval by the Compensation Committee and is subject to pre-approved bonus levels between 5% and 25%, based generally upon the position and seniority of the executive officer.  The CEO and the Compensation Committee use judgment and discretion rather than relying solely on formulaic results, and generally take into account the business and economic environment, the Company’s overall performance, budgetary considerations, each executive officer’s performance in relation to the goals set for him, competitive factors within the industry, and retention of key executives.

Annual incentive payments under the plan for a particular year with respect to executive officers who are bank senior management are based on a combination of financial and individual performance criteria established before the beginning of the year.  Such performance criteria generally will vary depending on the executive officer’s authority. Thus, for example, for those executive officers having authority or responsibility over the entire company, including the CEO and Dennis L. Brand, the performance criteria includes the attainment, on a company-wide basis, of budgeted earnings as well as budgeted classified assets and the results of the Company’s internal audit reports, which include the results of regulatory compliance audits.  For executive officers having line authority over a particular group of branches, such as Darryl Schmidt, David Harlow and the other Regional Executives, the performance criteria includes the attainment of such objectives, but only with respect to the particular branches over which the executive officer has responsibility. For executive officers having responsibility over various corporate administrative functions, annual incentive payments are based primarily on the attainment of individual performance objectives negotiated with David Rainbolt, the Company’s CEO, or

20

---

 

Dennis Brand, the Chief Executive Officer of BancFirst, at the beginning of the year.  Attainment of individual performance objectives is based on a subjective evaluation of each individual officer’s performance.  An executive officer’s potential cash incentive payment depends upon two factors: (x) the executive’s position with the bank, which establishes a maximum cash incentive award as a percent of base salary and (y) the extent to which the performance criteria, have been achieved, in the determination of the CEO and the Compensation Committee.  Whenever the specified performance criteria are not fully met, the CEO and the Compensation Committee determine the amount of incentive compensation paid, if any, based on their subjective evaluation of the extent to which the criteria were met and other factors.  The Compensation Committee conducts an evaluation of the CEO’s individual performance and determines the appropriate amount of performance-based incentive pay.  For officers other than the CEO, the CEO conducts an evaluation of each executive officer’s individual performance and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee as to the appropriate amount of performance-based incentive pay.

The payment of performance-based incentive compensation generally occurs in December of each year in respect of achievements of the fiscal year then ending.  For 2014, each of the named executive officers was eligible for performance-based incentive compensation ranging from 10% to 25% of the respective executive’s base salary.  As discussed in detail below, Messrs. Rainbolt and Brand each received performance-based incentive compensation totaling 11% of such person’s base salary, out of a maximum possible 20%, Mr. Schmidt received performance-based incentive compensation totaling 22.0% of his base salary, out of a maximum possible 25%, Mr. Foraker received performance-based incentive compensation totaling 10% of his base salary, out of a maximum possible 10%, and Mr. Harlow received performance-based incentive compensation totaling 11.8% of his base salary, out of a maximum possible 25%.

Mr. Rainbolt

For 2014, Mr. Rainbolt was eligible for a bonus up to 20% of his base salary, based upon budgeted net income and budgeted classified assets for the Company’s principal bank subsidiary, BancFirst, and the results of the Company’s internal audit of the Bank’s branches, all determined on a company-wide basis.  Each of these factors was weighted to constitute up to a 20% bonus, as indicated in the following table:

 

 

 

The net income and internal audit goals were fully attained, but the budgeted classified goal was not attained. This resulted in Mr. Rainbolt receiving a total cash incentive bonus for 2014 equal to 11% of his base salary.

Mr. Foraker

For 2014, Mr. Foraker was eligible for a bonus of up to 10% of his base salary.  The 2014 performance objectives for Mr. Foraker included no specific financial objectives, but instead related to strategic and operational objectives in connection with Mr. Foraker’s role throughout the year as Chief Risk Officer and Interim CFO. Mr. Foraker’s performance objective for 2014 included the following:

21

---

 

In reviewing Mr. Foraker’s attainment of those objectives, the CEO made a subjective determination that Mr. Foraker was generally successful in achieving the objectives set for him.  Accordingly, the CEO recommended to the Compensation Committee that Mr. Foraker be awarded the full bonus of 10% of his base salary.

Mr. Brand

 

For 2014, Mr. Brand was eligible for a bonus up to 20% of his base salary, based upon budgeted net income and budgeted classified assets for the Company’s principal bank subsidiary, BancFirst, and the results of the Company’s internal audit of the Bank’s branches, all determined on a company-wide basis.  Each of these factors was weighted to constitute up to a 20% bonus, as indicated in the following table: 

 

 

 

The budgeted net income and internal goals were fully attained, but the budgeted classified assets goal was not attained. This resulted in Mr. Brand receiving a total cash incentive bonus for 2014 equal to 11% of his base salary.

Mr. Schmidt

 

For 2014, Mr. Schmidt was eligible for a bonus of up to 25% of his base salary, based upon budgeted pre-tax net income and budgeted classified assets, internal audit results and non-interest income, all with respect to the BancFirst branches that Mr. Schmidt supervised. These factors were weighted so that the budgeted pre-tax net income goal constituted up to a 9.0% bonus, the classified assets goal constituted up to a 9.0% bonus, the branch audit results constituted up to a 2.0% bonus, and achievement of the non-interest income goal (which included attainment of budgeted insurance referrals with respect to BancFirst’s insurance agency subsidiary, achievement of budgeted treasury management revenue and net account openings) constituted up to a 5% bonus, as indicated in the following table:

 

 

 

The budgeted pretax net income and budgeted classified assets goals were fully attained.  The branch internal audit goal was not fully attained and the CEO recommended that Mr. Schmidt be paid 80% of the maximum bonus for this goal.  The noninterest income goal was not attained and the CEO recommended that Mr. Schmidt be paid 48% of the maximum bonus for this goal.  This resulted in Mr. Schmidt receiving a total cash incentive bonus for 2014 equal to 22% of his base salary.

22

---

 

Mr. Harlow

 

For 2014, Mr. Harlow was eligible for a bonus of up to 25% of his base salary, based upon budgeted pre-tax net income and budgeted classified assets, internal audit results and non-interest income, all with respect to the BancFirst branches that Mr. Harlow supervised. These factors were weighted so that the budgeted pre-tax net income goal constituted up to a 9.0% bonus, the classified assets goal constituted up to a 9.0% bonus, the branch audit results constituted up to a 2.0% bonus, and achievement of the non-interest income goal (which included attainment of budgeted insurance referrals with respect to BancFirst’s insurance agency subsidiary, achievement of budgeted treasury management revenue and net account openings) constituted up to a 5% bonus, as indicated in the following table:

 

 

 

The budgeted pretax net income goal was not fully attained and the CEO recommended that Mr. Harlow be paid 75% of the maximum bonus for this goal.  The budgeted classified assets goal was not attained and no bonus was awarded for this goal.  The internal audit goal was fully attained.  The noninterest income goal was not fully attained and the CEO recommended that Mr. Harlow be paid 60% of the maximum bonus for this goal. This resulted in Mr. Harlow receiving a total cash incentive bonus for 2014 equal to 11.75% of his base salary.

Long-Term Awards

Stock Option Grants

Executive officers receive equity compensation awards in the form of nonqualified incentive stock options under the BancFirst Corporation Stock Option Plan (the “Employee Plan”). The stock options are designed to align the interests of the executive officers with the shareholders’ long-term interests by providing them with equity awards that generally are exercisable beginning four years from the date of grant at the rate of 25% per year for four years. Historically, the Company has not granted equity awards to the same degree as its peers; typically, option grants have been made either as an employment incentive in connection with the Company’s efforts to employ an executive officer, as a retention device or to focus executive officers on the achievement of long-term corporate goals. The Employee Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors in 1986 and has been amended several times since its adoption to increase the number of shares issuable under the plan and to extend the term of the plan, which currently extends to December 31, 2019. The Company does not have stock ownership guidelines for its directors or executive officers. Given the CEO’s significant existing stock ownership in the Company, he has recommended to the Compensation Committee that he not be granted any additional stock options. Awards granted to our other executive officers are recommended by our CEO and approved by our Compensation Committee. All awards granted under the Plan are ratified by the full Board.

All stock options granted under the Employee Plan are made at the market price at the time of the award. The Company has never granted stock options with an exercise price that is less than the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported by NASDAQ on the grant date, nor has it granted stock options which were priced on a date other than the grant date. The long-term incentive award information for the Company’s named executive officers during fiscal year 2014 is included in “— Executive Compensation—Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year” and additional information on the option awards is shown in “—Executive Compensation—Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End.”

23

---

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreements

In 2007, the Company entered into supplemental retirement agreements with a number of the Company’s executive officers designated by the CEO. These agreements seek to encourage the executive officers who are parties to such agreements to remain employed with the Company. Under the terms of the agreements, which were approved by the Compensation Committee, the signatory executive officer will receive a specified annual benefit paid in monthly installments for a specified number of years, typically 10 years, after retirement at age 65. If the executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Company for cause or by reason of voluntary early retirement, the executive officer will not receive any benefits under the agreement. The agreements also provide for specified benefits (generally, the discounted present value of the income stream) in the event of a change-in-control or involuntary early retirement. For details regarding the terms and payments under the supplemental retirement agreement for Randy Foraker, David Harlow and Darryl Schmidt, the only named executive officers receiving such a benefit, see “—Executive Compensation—Potential Payments on Termination or Change-in-Control.”

Survivor Benefit Agreements

The Company has also entered into survivor benefit agreements with a number of the Company’s executive officers designated by the CEO. In connection with these agreements, the Company purchased life insurance policies with respect to the relevant individuals. Under these agreements, the Company owns the insurance policies, is entitled to the cash value of the policies and is responsible for paying the associated premiums. Upon the executive officer’s death while still employed with the Company, a beneficiary selected by the executive officer is entitled to a specified amount of the death benefit under the policy. The survivor benefit agreement and any benefit from it terminates upon the executive officer’s termination of employment for any reason, including retirement or disability. Randy Foraker, David Harlow and Darryl Schmidt are the only named executive officers who participated in this benefit. The value of the benefit is included in All Other Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.

Benefits Available to All Employees

The Company maintains a 401(k) employee savings and retirement plan, as well as an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”), both of which are broad-based plans covering all full-time employees, including the Company’s executive officers, who have attained the age of 21 years and who have completed six months of employment during the year.  The Company’s matching contribution to the 401(k) plan equals 50% of the first 6% of pay that is contributed by a participating employee to the plan.  Benefits under the ESOP are based solely on the amount contributed by the Company, which is used to purchase the Company’s common stock.  A participant’s allocation is the total employer contribution multiplied by the ratio of that participant’s applicable compensation over the amount of such compensation for all participants for that year.  The total amount contributed by the Company to the ESOP for 2014 was $1,928,000, and the total amount contributed by the Company to the 401(k) plan in 2014 was $1,870,000.  The contribution to the ESOP is based primarily on profits of the Company, but any contribution to the ESOP is within the sole discretion of the Board and there are no specific performance measures set forth in the ESOP. The Company’s contribution to these plans in 2014 is included as one of the components of compensation reported in “Summary Compensation Table – All Other Compensation.”

The Company offers group health and dental benefits to all full-time employees.  A specified amount of the premium is paid by the Company for all participating employees, and the employees pay the additional amount of the premium for their respective level of coverage.  The Company also provides fully-paid group term life insurance and long-term disability insurance to all full-time employees.  The benefits under these group plans are based on the annual salaries of the employees.

Perquisites

We generally limit perquisites that we make available to executive officers to those that are available to all employees or are required for their efficient conduct of Company business.  Three of the six named executive officers are furnished company-owned automobiles.  Certain of the named executive officers and other executive officers are also provided with club memberships and cell phones.  Pursuant to the Company’s Aircraft Policy, the named executive officers and other management employees are provided use of the Company’s aircraft for business purposes.  Generally, no named executive officer is provided use of the Company aircraft for personal travel.  Pursuant to the Aircraft Policy, any such use is fully charged against the individual, at a rate of $625 per flight hour plus pilot expenses.  The Company aircraft is owned jointly by the Company’s banking subsidiary and an entity affiliated with H.E. Rainbolt and David E. Rainbolt, whose personal use of the Company aircraft is governed by the terms of a Joint Ownership Agreement.  Information on the perquisites received by the named executive officers is included in “Summary Compensation Table – All Other Compensation.”

Employment Arrangements

The Company does not have employment arrangements with any of the named executive officers or any other executive officer.

24

---

 

Tax and Accounting Information

Deductibility of Executive Compensation. The qualifying compensation regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service under Internal Revenue Code section 162(m) provide that no deduction is allowed for applicable employee remuneration paid by a publicly held corporation to a covered employee to the extent that the remuneration exceeds $1.0 million for the applicable taxable year, unless specified conditions are satisfied. Currently, remuneration is not expected to exceed $1.0 million for any employee.  Therefore, the Company does not expect that compensation will be affected by the qualifying compensation regulations.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information relating to all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and three most highly compensated officers, collectively referred to as the named executive officers in this document, for services rendered in all capacities to us during the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2014.

Summary Compensation Table

 

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

No stock option grants were made to any of the named executive officers during 2014.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table includes certain information with respect to the value of all unexercised options previously awarded to the named executive officers at December 31, 2014.

25

---

 

 

 

Option Exercises

The following table shows the number of shares acquired and the value realized on the exercise of stock options during 2014 for each of the Company’s named executive officers.

 

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides certain information, as of December 31, 2014, concerning certain compensation plans under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized for issuance.

 

 

26

---

 

Supplemental Retirement Benefits

The table below shows the present value of accumulated benefit payable to Randy Foraker, David Harlow and Darryl Schmidt under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated November 15, 2006.  None of the other named executive officers are covered by a supplemental retirement agreement. The number of years of credited service for Messrs. Foraker, Harlow and Schmidt is their total years of service with the Company.  The present value of accumulated benefit payable to Messrs. Foraker, Harlow and Schmidt was determined using a retirement age of 65 and a discount rate of 6%.

 

 

Under the terms of the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement, if Messrs. Foraker, Harlow or Schmidt remains continually employed with the Bank until age 65, Mr. Harlow and Mr. Schmidt will be entitled to a supplemental retirement benefit of $100,000 per year for ten years, and Mr. Foraker will be entitled to a supplemental retirement benefit of $50,000 per year for ten years, irrespective of whether they then retire or continue to be employed by the Bank beyond age 65.  If Messrs. Foraker, Harlow or Schmidt dies during the ten-year period, their surviving spouse or other designated beneficiary will receive the remaining payments over the remainder of the ten-year period.  A lump-sum distribution, equal to the discounted present value of the aggregate supplemental payments, is payable upon separation from service following a change of control of the Bank or if Messrs. Foraker, Harlow or Schmidt is terminated without cause between the ages of 59 and 65.  No benefits are payable under the agreement if Messrs. Foraker, Harlow or Schmidt (i) ceases to be employed by the Bank for any reason (other than death) prior to reaching age 59 or (ii) is terminated by the Bank for “cause,” as such term is defined in the agreement, prior to reaching age 65. If Messrs. Foraker, Harlow or Schmidt dies before age 65 while still employed with the Bank, his surviving spouse or other designated beneficiary will receive a lump sum distribution equal to a percentage of the total lump sum amount of Messrs. Foraker, Harlow or Schmidt supplemental retirement income, calculated on the percentage that the total number of months between the effective date of the agreement and the executive’s death represents of the total months between the effective date of the agreement and the date the executive would have reached age 65.  Messrs. Foraker, Harlow or Schmidt will forfeit any non-distributed benefits payable under the agreement if he violates certain non-compete and confidentiality restrictions in the agreement.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control

Except for the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement of Randy Foraker, David Harlow and Darryl Schmidt described above, the Company has no agreements with any other named executive officer providing for potential payments upon termination of employment or a change-in-control of the Company.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

We provide the following elements of compensation for our non-employee directors, each of whom is also a director of the Bank:

We pay employee directors of the Company each a retainer of $500 per quarter for their services as directors.

The option grants are provided under the BancFirst Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “Directors’ Stock Plan”) and are exercisable at the rate of 25% per year beginning one year from the date of grant.  If a director is terminated for cause, all options will be forfeited immediately.  If a director ceases to be member of the Board for any other reason, unvested options will terminate and only previously vested options may be exercised for a period of 30 days following termination (or 12 months in the case of termination on account of death).

27

---

 

Non-employee directors can elect to defer all or any portion of their cash compensation through Deferred Stock Compensation Plan.  Under the Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, directors of the Company and members of the community advisory boards of the Bank may defer up to 100% of their Board fees.  They are credited for each deferral with a number of stock units based on the current market price of the Company’s stock, which accumulate in an account until such time as the director or community board member terminates service as a Board member.  Shares of our common stock are then distributed to the terminating director or community board member based upon the number of stock units accumulated in his or her account.  Because stock units are not actual shares of our common stock, they do not have any voting rights.

Additionally, non-employee directors may be reimbursed for their expenses in connection with attending Board meetings.

The following table provides compensation information for the Company’s directors who served during fiscal 2014.

Director Compensation

 

 

28

---

 

STOCK OWNERSHIP

Certain Beneficial Owners

Unless otherwise indicated, the following table sets forth information as of April 9, 2015 with respect to any person who is known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock, which is the Company’s only class of voting securities.

 

 

Because of his position with the Company and his equity ownership therein, David E. Rainbolt may be deemed to be a “parent” of the Company for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”).

Directors and Management

As of April 9, 2015, the directors and executive officers of the Company as a group (38 persons, including David E. Rainbolt and certain executive officers of the Bank), beneficially owned 6,863,558 shares of the Company’s common stock (44.23% of the total shares outstanding at that date), excluding 243,150 shares represented by options exercisable within 60 days.  It is the intent of the directors and executive officers to vote these shares (i) FOR the election of the 20 nominees named herein as directors of the Company and (ii) FOR the ratification of BKD, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

29

---

 

The following table sets forth as of April 9, 2015 the number of shares of common stock owned by (i) each director of the Company, (ii) each nominee for director, (iii) the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, together with the percentage of outstanding common stock owned by each.  The number of shares of common stock outstanding for each listed person includes any shares the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days after April 9, 2015.  For purposes of calculating each person’s or group’s percentage ownership, stock options exercisable within 60 days are included for that person or group, but not for the stock ownership of any other person or group.

 

 

30

---

 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file reports with the SEC regarding their ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock.  We believe that, during fiscal 2014, our directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements, with the exceptions noted herein. One Form 4 was filed late by Marion McMillan which was filed on March 6, 2014 to report a stock option exercise on February 28, 2014. One Form 4 was filed late by Dennis Brand which was filed on March 26, 2014 to report a stock option exercise on March 21, 2014. One Form 4 was filed late by Gregory Wedel which was filed on December 31, 2014 to report a stock option grant on December 18, 2014. In making these statements, we have relied upon examination of the copies of Forms 3, 4, and 5, and amendments thereto, provided to us and the written representations of our directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders.

PROPOSALS FOR THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

If you would like to have a proposal considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting, you must submit your proposal no later than December 23, 2015.  You must submit proposals in writing to the attention of the Secretary at the following address:

Secretary

BancFirst Corporation

101 N. Broadway

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102

OTHER MATTERS

The management of the Company does not know of any other matters that are to be presented for action at the meeting.  Should any other matter come before the meeting, however, it is the intent of the persons named in the proxy to vote all proxies with respect to such matter in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors.

 

 

 

31

---

 

Appendix A

BANCFIRST CORPORATION

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

CHARTER

(amended April 26, 2007)

Purposes

The purpose of the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of BancFirst Corporation (the “Company”) is:

Committee Membership

The Committee shall be comprised of at least three directors, each of whom shall satisfy the definition of “independent” under the applicable listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”).  In addition, members of the Committee will qualify as “non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), and as “outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The Committee members shall be appointed by the Board of Directors and may be removed by the Board in its discretion.  The Chairman of the Committee shall be designated by the Board of Directors. The Committee shall have the authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to one or more subcommittees as the Committee may from time to time deem appropriate.  Each such subcommittee shall consist of one or more members of the Committee.  The Committee shall also have the authority to delegate any of its administrative or other responsibilities to executive officers or other employees of the Company where such delegation is consistent with applicable law and NASDAQ listing standards.

Meetings

The Committee shall meet as often as its members deem necessary to perform the Committee’s responsibilities.  The Chief Executive Officer shall not be present when the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation is being approved.

Responsibilities and Duties

In fulfilling its responsibilities regarding executive compensation, the Committee shall:

A-1

---

 

 

 

 

A-2

---

 

Appendix B

BANCFIRST CORPORATION

CHARTER OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ COMMITTEE

(adopted April 2004)

Purpose and Authority

The purpose of the Independent Directors’ Committee is to provide a forum for the independent directors of the Board of Directors to meet periodically in executive sessions without Company management present to review and discuss matters of significance to the Company. The Independent Directors’ Committee also serves as the nominating committee of the Board.

Membership

The Independent Directors’ Committee shall be comprised of all directors that meet the independence requirements of the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market.  The Independent Directors’ Committee shall appoint a member as Chairperson. Membership in the committee shall be automatic and shall last so long as a director meets the applicable independence requirements.

Meetings

The Independent Directors’ Committee should meet at least twice annually, but may meet more frequently as they consider necessary. One such meeting should be for the purpose of nominating directors for election at the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and should be held an appropriate length of time before the annual meeting to allow prudent consideration of all candidates, and for the inclusion of the nominees in the Company’s proxy statement.

Responsibilities and Duties

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Independent Directors’ Committee should:

 

B-1

---

 

▼ FOLD AND DETACH HERE ▼

 

 

 

 

NOTE: Please complete, date and sign exactly as your name appears hereon. In the case of joint owners, each owner should sign. When signing as administrator, attorney, corporate officer, executor, guardian, trustee, etc., please give your full title as such. If a corporation, sign in full corporate name by authorized officer, giving title. If a partnership, sign in partnership name by authorized person. In case of joint ownership, each joint owner must sign.

 

---

 

▼ FOLD AND DETACH HERE ▼

 

 

BANCFIRST CORPORATION

OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA

PROXY/VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of

BancFirst Corporation for the Annual Meeting on May 28, 2015.

Your vote is important! Please sign and date on the reverse side

and return promptly in the enclosed envelope.

The undersigned hereby appoints David E. Rainbolt and Randy Foraker as Proxies each with the power to appoint his substitute and each with full power to act without the other, and hereby authorizes them to present and vote all shares of Common Stock of the undersigned of BancFirst Corporation (the “Company”) which the undersigned would be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the Venetian Room, Skirvin Hilton Hotel, 1 Park Avenue (the corner of Park Avenue and Broadway), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, on Thursday, May 28, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. and at any and all adjournments thereof on the reverse side:

(CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON OTHER SIDE)