e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009.
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File Number: 0-26176
DISH Network Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
88-0336997 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
9601 South Meridian Boulevard
Englewood, Colorado
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
80112
(Zip code) |
(303) 723-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 23, 2009, the registrants outstanding common stock consisted of 208,430,895 shares
of Class A common stock and 238,435,208 shares of Class B common stock.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995 throughout this report. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement
of historical fact (such as when we describe what we believe, intend, plan, estimate,
expect or anticipate will occur, and other similar statements), you must remember that our
expectations may not be achieved, even though we believe they are reasonable. We do not guarantee
that any future transactions or events described herein will happen as described or that they will
happen at all. You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual
future results may be materially different from what we expect. Whether actual events or results
will conform with our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
Weakened economic conditions, including the recent downturn in financial markets and
reduced consumer spending, may adversely affect our ability to grow or maintain our
business. |
|
|
|
|
If we do not improve our operational performance and customer satisfaction, our
gross subscriber additions may decrease and our subscriber churn may increase. |
|
|
|
|
If DISH Network gross subscriber additions decrease, or if subscriber churn,
subscriber acquisition or retention costs increase, our financial performance will be
further adversely affected. |
|
|
|
|
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion
for contempt, we are not successful in developing and deploying potential new
alternative technology and we are unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on
reasonable terms, we would be subject to substantial liability and would be prohibited
from offering DVR functionality that would result in a significant loss of subscribers
and place us at a significant disadvantage to our competitors. |
|
|
|
|
We face intense and increasing competition from satellite television providers,
cable television providers, telecommunications companies, and companies that
provide/facilitate the delivery of video content via the Internet. |
|
|
|
|
We may be required to make substantial additional investments in order to maintain
competitive high definition, or HD, programming offerings. |
|
|
|
|
Technology in our industry changes rapidly and could cause our services and products
to become obsolete. |
|
|
|
|
We may need additional capital, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at
all, in order to continue investing in our business and to finance acquisitions and
other strategic transactions. |
|
|
|
|
A portion of our investment portfolio is invested in securities that have
experienced limited or no liquidity in recent months and may not be immediately
accessible to support our financing needs. |
|
|
|
|
AT&Ts termination of its distribution agreement with us may increase churn. |
|
|
|
|
As technology changes, and in order to remain competitive, we may have to upgrade or
replace subscriber equipment and make substantial investments in our infrastructure. |
|
|
|
|
We rely on EchoStar Corporation, or EchoStar, to design and develop all of our new
set-top boxes and certain related components, and to provide transponder capacity,
digital broadcast operations and other services for us. Our business would be
adversely affected if EchoStar ceases to provide these services to us and we are unable
to obtain suitable replacement services from third parties. |
|
|
|
|
We rely on one or a limited number of vendors, and the inability of these key
vendors to meet our needs could have a material adverse effect on our business. |
|
|
|
|
Our programming signals are subject to theft, and we are vulnerable to other forms
of fraud that could require us to make significant expenditures to remedy. |
|
|
|
|
We depend on third parties to solicit orders for DISH Network services that
represent a significant percentage of our total gross subscriber acquisitions. |
i
|
|
|
We depend on others to provide the programming that we offer to our subscribers and,
if we lose access to this programming, our subscriber additions may decline or we may
suffer subscriber losses and subscriber churn may increase. |
|
|
|
|
Our competitors may be able to leverage their relationships with programmers so that
they are able to reduce their programming costs and offer exclusive content that will
place them at a competitive advantage to us. |
|
|
|
|
We depend on the Cable Act for access to programming from cable-affiliate
programmers at cost-effective rates. |
|
|
|
|
We face increasing competition from other distributors of foreign language
programming that may limit our ability to maintain our foreign language programming
subscriber base. |
|
|
|
|
Our local programming strategy faces uncertainty because we may not be able to
obtain necessary retransmission consents from local network stations. |
|
|
|
|
We are subject to significant regulatory oversight and changes in applicable
regulatory requirements could adversely affect our business. |
|
|
|
|
We have made a substantial investment in certain 700 MHz wireless licenses and will
be required to make significant additional investments in order to commercialize these
licenses and recoup our investment. |
|
|
|
|
We have substantial debt outstanding and may incur additional debt. |
|
|
|
|
We have limited owned and leased satellite capacity and satellite failures could
adversely affect our business. |
|
|
|
|
Our owned and leased satellites under construction are subject to risks related to
launch that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites. |
|
|
|
|
Our owned and leased satellites in orbit are subject to significant operational and
environmental risks that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites. |
|
|
|
|
Our owned and leased satellites have minimum design lives of 12 years, but could
fail or suffer reduced capacity before then. |
|
|
|
|
We currently have no commercial insurance coverage on the satellites we own and
could face significant impairment charges if one of our satellites fails. |
|
|
|
|
We may have potential conflicts of interest with EchoStar due to our common
ownership and management. |
|
|
|
|
We rely on key personnel and the loss of their services may negatively affect our
businesses. |
|
|
|
|
We are controlled by one principal stockholder who is also our Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
We are party to various lawsuits which, if adversely decided, could have a
significant adverse impact on our business, particularly lawsuits regarding
intellectual property. |
|
|
|
|
We may pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions to complement or expand
our business that may not be successful and with respect to which we may lose up to the
entire value of our investment. |
|
|
|
|
Our business depends substantially on Federal Communications Commission, or FCC,
licenses that can expire or be revoked or modified and applications for FCC licenses
that may not be granted. |
|
|
|
|
We are subject to digital HD carry-one-carry-all requirements that cause capacity
constraints. |
|
|
|
|
It may be difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so may be
beneficial to our shareholders, because of our capital structure. |
ii
|
|
|
We cannot assure you that there will not be deficiencies leading to material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
We may face other risks described from time to time in periodic and current reports
we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. |
All cautionary statements made herein should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking
statements wherever they appear. Investors should consider the risks described herein and should
not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We assume no responsibility for
updating forward-looking information contained or incorporated by reference herein or in other
reports we file with the SEC.
In this report, the words DISH Network, the Company, we, our and us refer to DISH Network
Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. EchoStar refers to
EchoStar Corporation and its subsidiaries.
iii
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
155,570 |
|
|
$ |
98,574 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
|
2,477,882 |
|
|
|
460,558 |
|
Trade accounts receivable other, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $15,786 and $15,207, respectively |
|
|
799,417 |
|
|
|
799,139 |
|
Trade accounts receivable EchoStar, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of zero |
|
|
20,516 |
|
|
|
21,570 |
|
Inventories,
net |
|
|
278,118 |
|
|
|
426,671 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
101,867 |
|
|
|
86,331 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,747 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
173,769 |
|
|
|
56,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
4,007,139 |
|
|
|
2,097,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
|
|
141,701 |
|
|
|
83,606 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,396,694 and $2,432,959, respectively |
|
|
2,869,236 |
|
|
|
2,663,289 |
|
FCC authorizations |
|
|
1,391,441 |
|
|
|
1,391,441 |
|
Marketable and other investment securities |
|
|
168,784 |
|
|
|
158,296 |
|
Other noncurrent assets, net |
|
|
80,438 |
|
|
|
65,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent assets |
|
|
4,651,600 |
|
|
|
4,362,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,658,739 |
|
|
$ |
6,460,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity (Deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable other |
|
$ |
262,061 |
|
|
$ |
174,216 |
|
Trade accounts payable EchoStar |
|
|
297,715 |
|
|
|
297,629 |
|
Deferred revenue and other |
|
|
810,612 |
|
|
|
830,529 |
|
Accrued programming |
|
|
971,922 |
|
|
|
1,020,086 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
902,070 |
|
|
|
619,210 |
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
27,193 |
|
|
|
13,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,296,573 |
|
|
|
2,980,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Obligations, Net of Current Portion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
6,075,629 |
|
|
|
4,969,423 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
280,442 |
|
|
|
235,551 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
387,467 |
|
|
|
224,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
6,743,538 |
|
|
|
5,429,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities |
|
|
10,040,111 |
|
|
|
8,409,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity (Deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $.01 par value, 1,600,000,000 shares authorized, 258,522,297
and 257,117,733 shares issued, 208,424,144 and 208,968,052 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
|
2,585 |
|
|
|
2,571 |
|
Class B common stock, $.01 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized,
238,435,208 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
Class C common stock, $.01 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,113,743 |
|
|
|
2,090,527 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(2,123 |
) |
|
|
(107,998 |
) |
Accumulated earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(2,036,138 |
) |
|
|
(2,492,804 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(1,462,380 |
) |
|
|
(1,443,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total DISH Network stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
(1,381,929 |
) |
|
|
(1,949,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
(1,381,372 |
) |
|
|
(1,949,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
$ |
8,658,739 |
|
|
$ |
6,460,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related revenue |
|
$ |
2,862,554 |
|
|
$ |
2,886,157 |
|
|
$ |
8,605,608 |
|
|
$ |
8,572,163 |
|
Equipment sales and other revenue |
|
|
23,393 |
|
|
|
41,918 |
|
|
|
74,876 |
|
|
|
95,755 |
|
Equipment sales EchoStar |
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
6,486 |
|
|
|
8,533 |
|
Transitional services and other revenue EchoStar |
|
|
4,923 |
|
|
|
6,273 |
|
|
|
14,199 |
|
|
|
19,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
2,892,147 |
|
|
|
2,936,781 |
|
|
|
8,701,169 |
|
|
|
8,696,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown below Note 11) |
|
|
1,623,397 |
|
|
|
1,534,133 |
|
|
|
4,705,551 |
|
|
|
4,402,771 |
|
Satellite and transmission expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown below Note 11): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar |
|
|
78,911 |
|
|
|
76,848 |
|
|
|
246,866 |
|
|
|
232,798 |
|
Other |
|
|
8,962 |
|
|
|
7,651 |
|
|
|
24,701 |
|
|
|
22,890 |
|
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales |
|
|
28,651 |
|
|
|
69,315 |
|
|
|
96,244 |
|
|
|
131,488 |
|
Subscriber acquisition costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales subscriber promotion subsidies EchoStar (exclusive
of depreciation shown below Note 11) |
|
|
56,293 |
|
|
|
53,418 |
|
|
|
152,215 |
|
|
|
116,489 |
|
Other subscriber promotion subsidies |
|
|
310,844 |
|
|
|
310,879 |
|
|
|
776,575 |
|
|
|
888,849 |
|
Subscriber acquisition advertising |
|
|
72,453 |
|
|
|
73,469 |
|
|
|
191,275 |
|
|
|
178,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total subscriber acquisition costs |
|
|
439,590 |
|
|
|
437,766 |
|
|
|
1,120,065 |
|
|
|
1,184,138 |
|
General and administrative expenses EchoStar |
|
|
11,022 |
|
|
|
14,300 |
|
|
|
34,577 |
|
|
|
40,740 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
146,626 |
|
|
|
133,282 |
|
|
|
415,857 |
|
|
|
371,364 |
|
Tivo litigation expense |
|
|
131,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (Note 11) |
|
|
228,395 |
|
|
|
245,646 |
|
|
|
696,988 |
|
|
|
766,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
2,697,484 |
|
|
|
2,518,941 |
|
|
|
7,669,184 |
|
|
|
7,152,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
194,663 |
|
|
|
417,840 |
|
|
|
1,031,985 |
|
|
|
1,543,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,591 |
|
|
|
16,609 |
|
|
|
23,637 |
|
|
|
44,082 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(98,857 |
) |
|
|
(101,802 |
) |
|
|
(273,926 |
) |
|
|
(284,845 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(1,915 |
) |
|
|
(106,055 |
) |
|
|
(42,072 |
) |
|
|
(124,583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(93,181 |
) |
|
|
(191,248 |
) |
|
|
(292,361 |
) |
|
|
(365,346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
101,482 |
|
|
|
226,592 |
|
|
|
739,624 |
|
|
|
1,178,370 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
|
|
(20,989 |
) |
|
|
(134,697 |
) |
|
|
(283,027 |
) |
|
|
(492,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
80,493 |
|
|
|
91,895 |
|
|
|
456,597 |
|
|
|
686,363 |
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
80,562 |
|
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
456,666 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
80,493 |
|
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
456,597 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(2,961 |
) |
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
55,599 |
|
|
|
(170,447 |
) |
|
|
100,406 |
|
|
|
(231,869 |
) |
Recognition of previously unrealized (gains) losses on
available-for-sale securities included in net income (loss) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
148,423 |
|
|
|
5,447 |
|
|
|
146,112 |
|
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,398 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(10,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
136,084 |
|
|
|
39,089 |
|
|
|
562,472 |
|
|
|
587,471 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
136,153 |
|
|
$ |
39,089 |
|
|
$ |
562,541 |
|
|
$ |
587,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
446,823 |
|
|
|
449,425 |
|
|
|
446,816 |
|
|
|
449,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
447,431 |
|
|
|
460,042 |
|
|
|
448,313 |
|
|
|
461,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
456,597 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
696,988 |
|
|
|
766,260 |
|
Equity in losses (earnings) of affiliates |
|
|
4,149 |
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on investments |
|
|
40,518 |
|
|
|
120,669 |
|
Non-cash, stock-based compensation |
|
|
8,557 |
|
|
|
11,690 |
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
29,131 |
|
|
|
151,638 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
4,117 |
|
|
|
5,878 |
|
Change in noncurrent assets |
|
|
6,769 |
|
|
|
8,470 |
|
Change in long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
44,074 |
|
|
|
31,010 |
|
Changes in current assets and current liabilities, net |
|
|
600,829 |
|
|
|
41,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
1,891,729 |
|
|
|
1,825,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable investment securities |
|
|
(4,056,711 |
) |
|
|
(4,344,319 |
) |
Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities |
|
|
2,116,604 |
|
|
|
4,457,908 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(724,316 |
) |
|
|
(844,265 |
) |
Change in restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
|
|
(58,398 |
) |
|
|
1,700 |
|
Deposit for 700 MHz wireless spectrum acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(711,871 |
) |
Purchase of strategic investments included in noncurrent marketable and other investment securities |
|
|
(47,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of strategic investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,200 |
|
Other |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
(2,770,046 |
) |
|
|
(1,335,352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of cash and cash equivalents to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(585,147 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
(28,618 |
) |
|
|
(4,972 |
) |
Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(20,043 |
) |
|
|
(535,513 |
) |
Class A common stock repurchases |
|
|
(18,594 |
) |
|
|
(81,906 |
) |
Net proceeds from Class A common stock options exercised and Class A common stock issued
under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
19,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
935,313 |
|
|
|
(437,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
56,996 |
|
|
|
52,400 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
98,574 |
|
|
|
919,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
155,570 |
|
|
$ |
971,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
238,696 |
|
|
$ |
240,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest |
|
$ |
13,454 |
|
|
$ |
11,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received for interest |
|
$ |
10,511 |
|
|
$ |
36,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
250,576 |
|
|
$ |
361,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefits paid in Class A common stock |
|
$ |
12,198 |
|
|
$ |
19,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor financing |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellites and other assets financed under capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
131,178 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets contributed in connection with the Spin-off, excluding cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,765,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Organization and Business Activities
Principal Business
DISH Network Corporation is a holding company. Its subsidiaries (which together with DISH Network
Corporation are referred to as DISH Network, the Company, we, us and/or our) operate the
DISH Network® direct broadcast satellite (DBS) subscription television service in the United
States which had 13.851 million subscribers as of September 30, 2009. We have deployed substantial
resources to develop the DISH Network DBS System. The DISH Network DBS System consists of our
licensed Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authorized DBS and Fixed Satellite Service
(FSS) spectrum, our owned and leased satellites, receiver systems, third-party broadcast
operations, customer service facilities, in-home service and call center operations and certain
other assets utilized in our operations.
Spin-off of Technology and Certain Infrastructure Assets
On January 1, 2008, we completed a tax-free distribution of our technology and set-top box business
and certain infrastructure assets (the Spin-off) into a separate publicly-traded company,
EchoStar Corporation (EchoStar). DISH Network and EchoStar now operate as separate
publicly-traded companies, and neither entity has any ownership interest in the other. However, a
substantial majority of the voting power of both companies is owned beneficially by Charles W.
Ergen, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer or by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family. The two entities consist of the
following:
|
|
|
DISH Network Corporation which retained its DISH Network® subscription television
business and |
|
|
|
|
EchoStar Corporation which sells equipment, including set-top boxes and related
components, to DISH Network and international customers, and provides digital broadcast
operations and satellite services to DISH Network and other customers. |
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information.
Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required for complete
financial statements prepared under GAAP. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. For further information, refer to the
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 (2008 10-K). Certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. In addition, the Income tax
(provision) benefit, net was reduced by prior period adjustments totaling $25 million for each of
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. Further, in connection with preparation of the
condensed consolidated financial statements, we have evaluated subsequent events through the
issuance of these financial statements on November 9, 2009.
Accounting Standards Codification
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (SFAS 168).
SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification)
4
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
as the single source of authoritative accounting principles
recognized by the FASB
to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity
with GAAP. The Codification does not change current GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access
to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature in one place related to a
particular topic. We were required to implement the Codification during the third quarter of 2009. The
Codification did not have any impact on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations. However, it affects the way we reference authoritative accounting literature in our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Accordingly, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
all subsequent applicable public filings will reference the Codification as the source of
authoritative literature.
Principles of Consolidation
We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries, investments in entities in which we have
controlling influence and variable interest entities where we have been determined to be the
primary beneficiary. Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when
we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee. When we do
not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost
method is used. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue
and expenses for each reporting period. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things,
allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory allowances, self-insurance obligations, deferred taxes
and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair value of
financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, fair
value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, capital leases, asset
impairments, useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, retailer incentives,
programming expenses, subscriber lives and royalty obligations. Illiquid credit markets and
general downward economic conditions have increased the inherent uncertainty in the estimates and
assumptions indicated above. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such
differences may be material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimates and
assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively in
the period they occur.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the carrying value of our cash and cash
equivalents, marketable investment securities, trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts, and current liabilities is equal to or approximates fair value due to their
short-term nature. See Note 7 for the fair value of our long-term debt.
3. Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share
We present both basic earnings per share (EPS) and diluted EPS. Basic EPS excludes dilution and
is computed by dividing Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the
potential dilution that could occur if stock awards were exercised and convertible securities were
converted to common stock.
5
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
The potential dilution from our subordinated notes convertible into common stock was computed using
the if converted method. The potential dilution from stock awards was computed using the
treasury stock method based on the average market value of our Class A common stock. The following
table presents earnings per share amounts for all periods and the basic and diluted
weighted-average shares outstanding used in the calculation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Basic net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
80,562 |
|
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
456,666 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
Interest on dilutive subordinated convertible notes, net of related tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
6,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
80,562 |
|
|
$ |
93,432 |
|
|
$ |
457,017 |
|
|
$ |
692,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
446,823 |
|
|
|
449,425 |
|
|
|
446,816 |
|
|
|
449,318 |
|
Dilutive impact of stock awards outstanding |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
Dilutive impact of subordinated notes convertible into common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,299 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
447,431 |
|
|
|
460,042 |
|
|
|
448,313 |
|
|
|
461,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010 (repaid during third quarter 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,299 |
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011 (repaid in October 2009) |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, there were stock awards to purchase 9.1 million shares and 3.4
million shares, respectively, of Class A common stock outstanding not included in the above
denominator as their effect is antidilutive. In addition, during the three months ended September
30, 2009, the convertible note is not included in the diluted EPS calculation as its conversion
would be antidilutive.
Vesting of options and rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock (Restricted
performance units) granted pursuant to our long-term, performance-based stock incentive plans is
contingent upon meeting certain long-term goals which have not yet been achieved. As a
consequence, the following are also not included in the diluted EPS calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Performance-based options |
|
|
9,633 |
|
|
|
9,548 |
|
Restricted performance units |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,218 |
|
|
|
10,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
4. Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Other Investment Securities
Our marketable investment securities, restricted cash and other investment securities consist of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Marketable investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current marketable investment securities VRDNs |
|
$ |
1,663,367 |
|
|
$ |
239,611 |
|
Current marketable investment securities
strategic |
|
|
211,503 |
|
|
|
13,561 |
|
Current marketable investment securities other |
|
|
603,012 |
|
|
|
207,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current marketable investment
securities |
|
|
2,477,882 |
|
|
|
460,558 |
|
Restricted marketable investment securities
(1) |
|
|
10,388 |
|
|
|
22,407 |
|
Noncurrent marketable investment securities ARS and MBS
(2) |
|
|
119,211 |
|
|
|
113,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable investment
securities |
|
|
2,607,481 |
|
|
|
596,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
(1) |
|
|
131,313 |
|
|
|
61,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investment securities cost
method |
|
|
49,573 |
|
|
|
15,795 |
|
Other investment securities equity
method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,784 |
|
Other investment securities fair value
method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investment securities
(2) |
|
|
49,573 |
|
|
|
44,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable investment securities, restricted cash and other investment securities |
|
$ |
2,788,367 |
|
|
$ |
702,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restricted marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents
are included in Restricted cash and marketable investment securities on our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
Noncurrent marketable investment securities auction rate securities (ARS), mortgage
backed securities (MBS) and other investment securities are included in Marketable and
other investment securities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
Marketable Investment Securities
Our marketable investment securities portfolio consists of various debt and equity instruments, all
of which are classified as available-for-sale.
Current Marketable Investment Securities VRDNs
Variable rate demand notes (VRDNs) are long-term floating rate municipal bonds with embedded put
options that allow the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued interest. All of the
put options are secured by a pledged liquidity source. Our VRDN portfolio is comprised of many
municipalities and financial institutions that serve as the pledged liquidity source. While they
are classified as marketable investment securities, the put option allows for VRDNs to be
liquidated on a same day or on a five business day settlement basis.
Current Marketable Investment Securities Strategic
Our strategic marketable investment securities are highly speculative and have experienced and
continue to experience volatility. As of September 30, 2009, a significant portion of our
strategic investment portfolio consisted of securities of a few issuers and the value of that
portfolio therefore depends on those issuers.
7
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
We account for certain debt securities acquired at a discount under the cost recovery
method, partial accrual or full accrual methods based on managements quarterly evaluation of these
securities. These debt securities were purchased at a discount due to their credit quality. As a
result, the yield that may be accreted (accretable yield) is limited to the excess of our estimate
of undiscounted expected principal, interest, and other cash flows (including the effects of
prepayments) expected to be collected over our initial investment. The face value of these
securities as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $137 million and $9 million,
respectively. The carrying value, which is equal to fair value, of these securities as of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $60 million and $2 million, respectively. The total
discount on these securities was $91 million as of September 30, 2009 with $12 million classified
as accretable yield and the remaining $79 million classified as non-accretable yield. As of
December 31, 2008, the entire discount of $6 million was classified as non-accretable yield.
Current Marketable Investment Securities Other
Our other current marketable investment securities portfolio includes investments in various debt
instruments including corporate and government bonds.
Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our restricted marketable investment securities,
together with our restricted cash, included amounts required as collateral for our letters of
credit or surety bonds. Restricted cash and marketable investment securities as of September 30,
2009 included $62 million related to our litigation with Tivo.
Noncurrent Marketable Investment Securities ARS and MBS
We have investments in ARS and MBS which are classified as available-for-sale securities and
reported at fair value. Events in the credit markets have reduced or eliminated current liquidity
for certain of our ARS and MBS investments. As a result, we classify these investments as
noncurrent assets as we intend to hold these investments until they recover or mature.
The valuation of our ARS and MBS investments portfolio is subject to uncertainties that are
difficult to estimate. Due to the lack of observable market quotes for identical assets, we
utilize analyses that rely on Level 2 and/or Level 3 inputs, as defined in Fair Value
Measurements. These inputs include, among other things, observed prices on similar assets as well
as our assumptions and estimates related to the counterparty credit quality, default risk
underlying the security and overall capital market liquidity. These securities were also compared,
when possible, to other observable market data for financial instruments with similar
characteristics.
Other Investment Securities
We have several strategic investments in certain equity securities that are included in noncurrent
Marketable and other investment securities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets accounted
for using the cost, equity or fair value methods of accounting.
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly
traded depends on the success of those companies businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient
capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public
markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that
when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.
8
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had accumulated net unrealized losses of $11
million and $116 million, both net of related tax effect, respectively, as a part of Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) within Total stockholders equity (deficit). A full valuation
allowance has been established against the deferred tax assets associated with these unrealized
capital losses. The components of our available-for-sale investments are detailed in the table
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Marketable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VRDNs |
|
$ |
1,663,367 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
239,611 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
ARS and MBS |
|
|
119,211 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
(73,121 |
) |
|
|
(72,614 |
) |
|
|
113,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,943 |
) |
|
|
(103,943 |
) |
Other (including restricted) |
|
|
741,833 |
|
|
|
38,972 |
|
|
|
(3,005 |
) |
|
|
35,967 |
|
|
|
231,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,442 |
) |
|
|
(12,442 |
) |
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
83,070 |
|
|
|
28,873 |
|
|
|
(2,759 |
) |
|
|
26,114 |
|
|
|
11,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable investment securities |
|
$ |
2,607,481 |
|
|
$ |
68,353 |
|
|
$ |
(78,885 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,532 |
) |
|
$ |
596,359 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(116,385 |
) |
|
$ |
(116,385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, restricted and non-restricted marketable investment securities include
debt securities of $2.344 billion with contractual maturities of one year or less and $180 million
with contractual maturities greater than one year. Actual maturities may differ from contractual
maturities as a result of our ability to sell these securities prior to maturity.
Marketable Investment Securities in a Loss Position
The following table reflects the length of time that the individual securities, accounted for as
available-for-sale, have been in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category.
As of September 30, 2009, the unrealized losses on our investments in equity securities represent
investments in a broad based-index. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the unrealized
losses on our investments in debt securities primarily represent investments in auction rate,
mortgage and asset-backed securities. We do not intend to sell our investments in these debt
securities before they recover or mature, and it is more likely than not that we will hold these
investments until that time. In addition, we are not aware of any specific factors indicating that
the underlying issuers of these debt securities would not be able to pay interest as it becomes due
or repay the principal at maturity. Therefore, we believe that these changes in the estimated fair
values of these marketable investment securities are related to temporary market fluctuations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Primary |
|
Total |
|
Less than Six Months |
|
|
Six to Nine Months |
|
|
Nine Months or More |
|
Investment |
|
|
Reason for |
|
Fair |
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Category |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
Temporary market fluctuations |
|
$ |
288,522 |
|
|
$ |
111,128 |
|
|
$ |
(273 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
177,394 |
|
|
$ |
(75,853 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
Temporary market fluctuations |
|
|
47,241 |
|
|
|
47,241 |
|
|
|
(2,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$ |
335,763 |
|
|
$ |
158,369 |
|
|
$ |
(3,032 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
177,394 |
|
|
$ |
(75,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
Temporary market fluctuations |
|
$ |
295,676 |
|
|
$ |
2,070 |
|
|
$ |
(540 |
) |
|
$ |
8,114 |
|
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
285,492 |
|
|
$ |
(115,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
295,676 |
|
|
$ |
2,070 |
|
|
$ |
(540 |
) |
|
$ |
8,114 |
|
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
285,492 |
|
|
$ |
(115,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Fair Value Measurements
We determine fair value based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Market or observable inputs are
the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on
hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. We apply the following hierarchy in
determining fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2, defined as observable inputs including quoted prices for similar assets in
active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not
active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value
drivers are observable in active markets; and |
|
|
|
|
Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists,
therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available. |
Our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value As of September 30, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Marketable investment
securities |
|
$ |
2,607,481 |
|
|
$ |
93,068 |
|
|
$ |
2,403,350 |
|
|
$ |
111,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Level 3 instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2008 |
|
$ |
106,679 |
|
|
$ |
104,356 |
|
|
$ |
2,323 |
|
Net realized/unrealized gains/(losses) included in
earnings |
|
|
(10,809 |
) |
|
|
(8,486 |
) |
|
|
(2,323 |
) |
Net realized/unrealized gains/(losses) included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
31,460 |
|
|
|
31,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
(16,267 |
) |
|
|
(16,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30,
2009 |
|
$ |
111,063 |
|
|
$ |
111,063 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and Losses on Sales and Changes in Carrying Values of Investments
Other, net income and expense included on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income (Loss) includes other changes in the carrying amount of our marketable and
non-marketable investments as follows:
10
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Marketable investment securities gains (losses) on sales/exchange |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
(363 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,716 |
) |
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
Other investment securities gains (losses) on sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,473 |
|
Marketable investment securities other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148,003 |
) |
Other investment securities unrealized gains (losses) on fair value
investments and other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
(10,549 |
) |
|
|
(35,802 |
) |
|
|
(28,259 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,084 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
(1,554 |
) |
|
|
(3,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,915 |
) |
|
$ |
(106,055 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,072 |
) |
|
$ |
(124,583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Finished goods DBS |
|
$ |
179,648 |
|
|
$ |
238,343 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
72,310 |
|
|
|
146,353 |
|
Work-in-process used |
|
|
58,109 |
|
|
|
61,663 |
|
Work-in-process new |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
311,301 |
|
|
|
448,773 |
|
Inventory allowance |
|
|
(33,183 |
) |
|
|
(22,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
278,118 |
|
|
$ |
426,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009 our inventory balance was $278 million, a decline of $149 million compared to
our balance at December 31, 2008. This decline primarily related to the impact of our sales and
marketing promotions and reduced churn during the third quarter of 2009.
6. Satellites
We currently utilize eleven satellites in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the
equator, four of which are owned by us. Each of the owned satellites had an original estimated
minimum useful life of at least 12 years. We currently lease capacity on five satellites from
EchoStar with terms ranging from two to ten years. We account for these as operating leases. See
Note 12 for further discussion of our satellite leases with EchoStar. We also lease two satellites
from third parties, which are accounted for as capital leases and are depreciated over the shorter
of the economic life or the term of the satellite agreement.
Operation of our programming service requires that we have adequate satellite transmission capacity
for the programming we offer. Moreover, current competitive conditions require that we continue to
expand our offering of new programming, particularly by expanding local HD coverage and offering
more HD national channels. While we generally have had in-orbit satellite capacity sufficient to
transmit our existing channels and some backup capacity to recover the transmission of certain
critical programming, our backup capacity is limited.
In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may need to acquire or lease
additional satellite capacity or relocate one of our other satellites and use it as a replacement
for the failed or lost satellite. Such a failure could result in a prolonged loss of critical
programming or a significant delay in our plans to expand programming as necessary to remain
competitive and thus may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
11
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Prior to 2009, certain satellites in our fleet have experienced anomalies, some of which have had a
significant adverse impact on their remaining life and commercial operation. There can be no
assurance that future anomalies will not further impact the remaining life and commercial operation
of any of these satellites. See Long-Lived Satellite Assets below for further discussion of
evaluation of impairment. There can be no assurance that we can recover critical transmission
capacity in the event one or more of our in-orbit satellites were to fail. We do not anticipate
carrying insurance for any of the in-orbit satellites that we own, and we will bear the risk
associated with any in-orbit satellite failures. Recent developments with respect to our
satellites are discussed below.
Owned Satellites
EchoStar V. EchoStar V was originally designed with a minimum 12-year design life. Momentum wheel
failures in prior years, together with relocation of the satellite between orbital locations,
resulted in increased fuel consumption, as disclosed in previous SEC filings. During 2005, as a
result of this increased fuel consumption, we reduced the remaining estimated useful life of the
satellite and as of October 2008, the satellite was fully depreciated. In late July 2009, it was
determined that the satellite had less fuel remaining than previously estimated. The satellite was
removed from the 148 degree orbital location and retired from commercial service on August 3, 2009
and this retirement did not have a material impact on the DISH Network service.
As a result of the retirement of EchoStar V, we currently do not have any satellites positioned at
the 148 degree orbital location. While we have requested a waiver from the FCC for the continued
use of this orbital location, there can be no assurance that the FCC will determine that our
proposed future use of this orbital location complies fully with all licensing requirements. If
the FCC decides to revoke this license, we may be required to write-off its $68 million carrying
value.
Leased Satellites
EchoStar III. EchoStar III was originally designed to operate a maximum of 32 DBS transponders in
full continental United States (CONUS) mode at approximately 120 watts per channel, switchable to
16 transponders operating at over 230 watts per channel, and was equipped with a total of 44
traveling wave tube amplifiers (TWTAs) to provide redundancy. As a result of TWTA failures in
previous years and an additional pair of TWTA failures during August 2009, only 16 transponders are
currently available for use. Due to redundancy switching limitations and specific channel
authorizations, we are currently operating on 14 of our FCC authorized frequencies at the 61.5
degree orbital location. While the failures have not reduced the original minimum 12-year design
life of the satellite, it is likely that additional TWTA failures will occur from time to time in
the future, and such failures could further impact commercial operation of the satellite.
EchoStar XII. Prior to 2009, EchoStar XII experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of
electrical power available from its solar arrays. During March and May 2009, EchoStar XII
experienced more of these anomalies, which further reduced the electrical power available to
operate EchoStar XII. We currently operate EchoStar XII in CONUS/spot beam hybrid mode. If we
continue to operate the satellite in this mode, as a result of this loss of electrical power, we
would be unable to use the full complement of its available transponders for the 12-year design
life of the satellite. However, since the number of useable transponders on EchoStar XII depends
on, among other things, whether EchoStar XII is operated in CONUS, spot beam, or hybrid CONUS/spot
beam mode, we are unable to determine at this time the actual number of transponders that will be
available at any given time or how many transponders can be used during the remaining estimated
life of the satellite.
Nimiq 5. Nimiq 5 was launched in September 2009 and commenced commercial operation at the 72.7
degree orbital location during October 2009, where it provides additional high-powered capacity to
support expansion of our programming services. See Note 12 for further discussion.
Long-Lived Satellite Assets
We evaluate our satellite fleet for impairment as one asset group and test for recoverability
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be
recoverable. While certain of the anomalies discussed above, and previously disclosed, may be
considered to represent a significant adverse change in the
12
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
physical condition of an individual satellite, based on the redundancy designed within each
satellite and considering the asset grouping, these anomalies are not considered to be significant
events that would require evaluation for impairment recognition. Unless and until a specific
satellite is abandoned or otherwise determined to have no service potential, the net carrying
amount related to the satellite would not be written off.
7. Long-Term Debt
7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019
On August 17, 2009, we issued $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of our ten-year, 7 7/8%
Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 at an issue price of 97.467%. Interest accrues at an annual
rate of 7 7/8% and is payable semi-annually in cash, in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each
year, commencing on March 1, 2010.
On October 5, 2009, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of additional 7 7/8% Senior
Notes due 2019 at an issue price of 101.750% plus accrued interest from August 17, 2009. These
notes were issued as additional notes under the indenture, dated as of August 17, 2009 (the
Indenture), pursuant to which we issued the $1.0 billion discussed above. These notes and the
notes previously issued under the Indenture will be treated as a single class of debt securities
under the Indenture.
The 7 7/8% Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal
to 100% of the principal amount plus a make-whole premium, as defined in the related Indenture,
together with accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to September 1, 2012, we may also redeem up to
35% of each of the 7 7/8% Senior Notes at specified premiums with the net cash proceeds from certain
equity offerings or capital contributions.
The 7 7/8% Senior Notes are:
|
|
|
general unsecured senior obligations of DISH DBS Corporation (DDBS); |
|
|
|
|
ranked equally in right of payment with all of DDBS and the guarantors existing
and future unsecured senior debt; and |
|
|
|
|
ranked effectively junior to our and the guarantors current and future secured
senior indebtedness up to the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. |
The Indenture related to the 7 7/8% Senior Notes contains restrictive covenants that, among other
things, impose limitations on the ability of DDBS and its restricted subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
incur additional debt; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make distributions on DDBS capital stock or repurchase DDBS
capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
make certain investments; |
|
|
|
|
create liens or enter into sale and leaseback transactions; |
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with another company; and |
|
|
|
|
transfer or sell assets. |
In the event of a change of control, as defined in the related indenture, we would be required to
make an offer to repurchase all or any part of a holders 7 7/8% Senior Notes at a purchase price
equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest
thereon, to the date of repurchase.
13
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Fair Value of our Long-Term Debt
The following table summarizes the carrying value and fair values of our debt facilities as of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
23,768 |
|
6 3/8% Senior Notes due 2011 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,021,250 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
899,000 |
|
7% Senior Notes due 2013 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
507,500 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
419,000 |
|
6 5/8% Senior Notes due 2014 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
977,500 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
840,300 |
|
7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015 |
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
770,625 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,492,500 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,246,890 |
|
7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019 (1) |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,008,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
43,287 |
|
|
|
43,287 |
|
|
|
46,211 |
|
|
|
46,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
5,818,287 |
|
|
|
5,846,412 |
|
|
|
4,821,211 |
|
|
|
4,075,169 |
|
Capital lease obligations (2) |
|
|
309,535 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
186,545 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt (including current portion) |
|
$ |
6,127,822 |
|
|
$ |
5,846,412 |
|
|
$ |
5,007,756 |
|
|
$ |
4,075,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes $400 million in additional 7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019 issued on October 5,
2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Disclosure regarding fair value of capital leases is not required. |
Capital Lease Obligations
Ciel II, a Canadian DBS satellite, was launched in December 2008 and commenced commercial operation
at the 129 degree orbital location in February 2009. We have leased 100% of the capacity on the
satellite for an initial term of ten years. Prior to the launch, we pre-paid $131 million to SES
Americom in connection with the lease agreement and we capitalized $16 million of interest related
to this satellite. We have accounted for this agreement as a capital lease asset by recording $277
million as the estimated fair value of the satellite and recording a capital lease obligation in
the amount of $130 million.
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $500 million and $223 million, respectively,
capitalized for satellites acquired under capital leases included in Property and equipment, net
with related accumulated depreciation of $56 million and $26 million, respectively. This increase
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 related to the Ciel II satellite is discussed
above.
In our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), we
recognized depreciation expense on satellites acquired under capital lease agreements as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense capital
leases |
|
$ |
10,634 |
|
|
$ |
3,724 |
|
|
$ |
29,598 |
|
|
$ |
11,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Future minimum lease payments under our capital lease obligations, together with the present value
of the net minimum lease payments as of September 30, 2009, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2009 (remaining three months) |
|
$ |
19,333 |
|
2010 |
|
|
81,266 |
|
2011 |
|
|
78,353 |
|
2012 |
|
|
75,970 |
|
2013 |
|
|
75,970 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
542,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
|
873,070 |
|
Less: Amount representing use of the orbital location and estimated executory costs (primarily
insurance and maintenance) including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease payments |
|
|
(400,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net minimum lease payments |
|
|
472,561 |
|
Less: Amount representing interest |
|
|
(163,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments |
|
|
309,535 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
(23,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
286,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
Common Stock Repurchase Program
Our board of directors previously authorized stock repurchases of up to $1.0 billion of our Class A
common stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we repurchased 1.9 million shares
of our common stock for $19 million. On November 3, 2009, our board of directors extended the plan
and authorized an increase in the maximum dollar value of shares that may be repurchased under the
plan, such that we are currently authorized to repurchase up to $1.0 billion of our outstanding
shares through and including December 31, 2010.
9. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Incentive Plans
In connection with the Spin-off, as permitted by our existing stock incentive plans and consistent
with the Spin-off exchange ratio, each DISH Network stock option was converted into two stock
options as follows:
|
|
|
an adjusted DISH Network stock option for the same number of shares that were
exercisable under the original DISH Network stock option, with an exercise price
equal to the exercise price of the original DISH Network stock option multiplied by
0.831219. |
|
|
|
|
a new EchoStar stock option for one-fifth of the number of shares that were
exercisable under the original DISH Network stock option, with an exercise price
equal to the exercise price of the original DISH Network stock option multiplied by
0.843907. |
Similarly, each holder of DISH Network restricted stock units retained his or her DISH Network
restricted stock units and received one EchoStar restricted stock unit for every five DISH Network
restricted stock units that they held.
Consequently, the fair value of the DISH Network stock award and the new EchoStar stock award
immediately following the Spin-off was equivalent to the fair value of such stock award immediately
prior to the Spin-off.
We maintain stock incentive plans to attract and retain officers, directors and key employees.
Stock awards under these plans include both performance and non-performance based stock incentives.
As of September 30, 2009, we
had outstanding under these plans stock options to acquire 21.7 million shares of our Class A
common stock and 0.8 million restricted stock units. Stock options granted through September 30,
2009 were granted with exercise prices equal to or greater than the market value of our Class A
common stock at the date of grant and with a maximum
15
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
term of ten years. While historically we have
issued stock awards subject to vesting, typically at the rate of 20% per year, some stock awards
have been granted with immediate vesting and other stock awards vest only upon the achievement of
certain company-wide objectives. As of September 30, 2009, we had 79.7 million shares of our Class
A common stock available for future grant under our stock incentive plans. The 2009 Stock
Incentive Plan, which was approved at the annual meeting of shareholders on May 11, 2009, allows us
to grant new stock awards following the expiration of our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan on April 16,
2009.
As of September 30, 2009, the following stock awards were outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
DISH Network Awards |
|
|
EchoStar Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
Stock Awards Outstanding |
|
Options |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Units |
|
Held by DISH Network employees |
|
|
18,221,050 |
|
|
|
400,068 |
|
|
|
1,398,788 |
|
|
|
63,833 |
|
Held by EchoStar employees |
|
|
3,451,851 |
|
|
|
410,374 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
21,672,901 |
|
|
|
810,442 |
|
|
|
1,398,788 |
|
|
|
63,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are responsible for fulfilling all stock awards related to DISH Network common stock and
EchoStar is responsible for fulfilling all stock awards related to EchoStar common stock,
regardless of whether such stock awards are held by our or EchoStars employees. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, our stock-based compensation expense, resulting from stock awards outstanding at the
Spin-off date, is based on the stock awards held by our employees regardless of whether such stock
awards were issued by DISH Network or EchoStar. Accordingly, stock-based compensation that we
expense with respect to EchoStar stock awards is included in Additional paid-in capital on our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Stock Award Activity
Our stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price |
Total options outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
21,835,687 |
|
|
$ |
22.50 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,339,500 |
|
|
|
14.09 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(140,600 |
) |
|
|
6.27 |
|
Forfeited and cancelled |
|
|
(2,361,686 |
) |
|
|
22.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options outstanding, end of period |
|
|
21,672,901 |
|
|
|
21.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance based options outstanding, end of period (1) |
|
|
9,632,750 |
|
|
|
16.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period |
|
|
7,379,219 |
|
|
|
29.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These stock options, which are included in the caption Total options outstanding, end of
period, were issued pursuant to two separate long-term, performance-based stock incentive plans. Vesting of these stock options is contingent upon meeting certain long-term company
goals. See discussion of the 2005 LTIP and 2008 LTIP below. |
16
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
We realized tax benefits from stock awards exercised during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Tax benefit from
stock awards
exercised |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
2,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the closing market price of our Class A common stock on September 30, 2009, the aggregate
intrinsic value of our stock options was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Aggregate intrinsic
value |
|
$ |
64,836 |
|
|
$ |
1,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our restricted stock unit activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Average |
|
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Units |
|
Fair Value |
Total restricted stock units outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
1,452,734 |
|
|
$ |
27.87 |
|
Granted |
|
|
6,666 |
|
|
|
11.11 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
25.90 |
|
Forfeited and cancelled |
|
|
(618,958 |
) |
|
|
30.12 |
|
Total restricted stock units outstanding, end of period |
|
|
810,442 |
|
|
|
26.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted performance units outstanding, end of period (1) |
|
|
585,067 |
|
|
|
24.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These restricted performance units, which are included in the caption Total restricted stock
units outstanding, end of period, were issued pursuant to two separate long-term,
performance-based stock incentive plans. Vesting of these restricted performance units is
contingent upon meeting certain long-term company goals. See discussion of the 2005 LTIP and 2008
LTIP below. |
Long-Term Performance-Based Plans
2005 LTIP. In 2005, we adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the 2005
LTIP). The 2005 LTIP provides stock options and restricted stock units, either alone or in
combination, which vest over seven years at the rate of 10% per year during the first four years,
and at the rate of 20% per year thereafter. Exercise of the stock awards is subject to a
performance condition that a company-specific subscriber goal is achieved prior to March 31, 2015.
Contingent compensation related to the 2005 LTIP will not be recorded in our financial statements
unless and until management concludes achievement of the performance condition is probable. Given
the competitive nature of our business, small variations in subscriber churn, gross subscriber
addition rates and certain other factors can
significantly impact subscriber growth. Consequently, while it was determined that achievement of
the goal was not probable as of September 30, 2009, that assessment could change at any time.
17
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
If all of the stock awards under the 2005 LTIP were vested and the goal had been met or if we had
determined that achievement of the goal was probable during the nine months ended September 30,
2009, we would have recorded total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for our employees as
indicated in the table below. If the goal is met and there are unvested stock awards at that time,
the vested amounts would be expensed immediately on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), with the unvested portion recognized ratably over the
remaining vesting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 LTIP |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Vested Portion |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
DISH Network awards held by DISH Network employees |
|
$ |
39,097 |
|
|
$ |
13,856 |
|
EchoStar awards held by DISH Network employees |
|
|
7,938 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
47,035 |
|
|
$ |
16,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 LTIP. In December 2008, we adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the
2008 LTIP). The 2008 LTIP provides stock options and restricted stock units, either alone or in
combination, which vest based on company-specific subscriber and financial metrics. Exercise of
the stock awards is contingent on achieving these goals prior to December 31, 2015.
As of September 30, 2009, we generated cumulative free cash flow in excess of $1.0 billion which
will result in approximately 10% of the 2008 LTIP stock awards vesting during the fourth quarter
2009. We recorded non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 as indicated in the table below. Additional compensation related to the 2008 LTIP will be
recorded based on managements assessment of the probability of meeting the remaining performance
conditions. If the remaining goals are probable of being achieved and stock awards vest, we will recognize the
additional non-cash, stock-based compensation expense on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) over the term of this stock incentive plan as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash |
|
|
|
Stock-Based |
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
2008 LTIP |
|
Expense |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total expense |
|
$ |
26,214 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Expense recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
(1,935 |
) |
Remaining expense expected to be recognized during 2009 |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Remaining expense over the term of the plan |
|
$ |
23,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
18
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Of the 21.7 million stock options and 0.8 million restricted stock units outstanding under our
stock incentive plans as of September 30, 2009, the following awards were outstanding pursuant to
the 2005 LTIP and the 2008 LTIP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
|
Awards |
|
Price |
Stock Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 LTIP |
|
|
3,656,250 |
|
|
$ |
25.06 |
|
2008 LTIP |
|
|
5,976,500 |
|
|
$ |
11.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
9,632,750 |
|
|
$ |
16.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Performance Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 LTIP |
|
|
504,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 LTIP |
|
|
80,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
585,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
Total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for all of our employees is shown in the following
table for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and was allocated to the same
expense categories as the base compensation for such employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Subscriber-related |
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
747 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
3,676 |
|
|
|
7,810 |
|
|
|
11,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-cash, stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
|
$ |
3,889 |
|
|
$ |
8,557 |
|
|
$ |
11,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, our total unrecognized compensation cost related to our non-performance
based unvested stock awards was $28 million and includes compensation expense that we will
recognize for EchoStar stock awards held by our employees as a result of the Spin-off. This cost
is based on an estimated future forfeiture rate of approximately 4.0% per year and will be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately three years. Share-based compensation
expense is recognized based on stock awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for
estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary,
in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in the estimated
forfeiture rate can have a significant effect on share-based compensation expense since the effect
of adjusting the rate is recognized in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed.
The fair value of each stock award for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
was estimated at the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model with the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Stock Options |
Risk-free interest
rate |
|
2.67% - 3.00% |
|
|
3.15% |
|
1.97% - 3.19% |
|
2.74% - 3.42% |
Volatility factor |
|
33.10% - 34.00% |
|
|
24.90% |
|
29.72% - 34.00% |
|
19.98% - 24.90% |
Expected term of options in years |
|
6.2 - 6.7 |
|
|
6.1 |
|
6.0 - 7.3 |
|
6.0 - 6.1 |
Weighted-average fair value of options granted |
|
$7.37 - $7.74 |
|
|
$6.65 |
|
$3.86 - $7.74 |
|
$6.65 - $8.72 |
On November 6, 2009, our board of directors declared a dividend of $2.00 per share on
our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. The dividend will be payable in cash on December
2, 2009 to shareholders of record on November 20, 2009. We do not intend to pay additional
dividends on our common stock and accordingly,
19
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
the dividend yield percentage used in the
Black-Scholes option valuation model is set at zero for all periods. The Black-Scholes option
valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded stock options which
have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Consequently, our estimate of fair value
may differ from other valuation models. Further, the Black-Scholes option valuation model requires
the input of highly subjective assumptions. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate. Therefore, we do not believe the existing models
provide as reliable a single measure of the fair value of stock-based compensation awards as a
market-based model would.
We will continue to evaluate the assumptions used to derive the estimated fair value of our stock
options as new events or changes in circumstances become known.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
As of September 30, 2009, future maturities of our debt and contractual obligations are summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
5,818,287 |
|
|
$ |
26,181 |
|
|
$ |
4,142 |
|
|
$ |
1,004,375 |
|
|
$ |
4,622 |
|
|
$ |
504,183 |
|
|
$ |
4,274,784 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
309,535 |
|
|
|
4,886 |
|
|
|
22,382 |
|
|
|
21,054 |
|
|
|
20,582 |
|
|
|
22,646 |
|
|
|
217,985 |
|
Interest expense on long-term
debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
2,695,287 |
|
|
|
118,866 |
|
|
|
438,690 |
|
|
|
433,780 |
|
|
|
368,089 |
|
|
|
365,985 |
|
|
|
969,877 |
|
Satellite-related obligations |
|
|
1,639,821 |
|
|
|
81,900 |
|
|
|
116,795 |
|
|
|
107,082 |
|
|
|
154,222 |
|
|
|
154,005 |
|
|
|
1,025,817 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
120,285 |
|
|
|
12,032 |
|
|
|
45,753 |
|
|
|
25,220 |
|
|
|
19,402 |
|
|
|
9,817 |
|
|
|
8,061 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
1,342,570 |
|
|
|
1,093,823 |
|
|
|
194,480 |
|
|
|
19,160 |
|
|
|
15,450 |
|
|
|
15,827 |
|
|
|
3,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,925,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,337,688 |
|
|
$ |
822,242 |
|
|
$ |
1,610,671 |
|
|
$ |
582,367 |
|
|
$ |
1,072,463 |
|
|
$ |
6,500,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above does not include $246 million of liabilities associated with unrecognized tax
benefits which were accrued and are included on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
September 30, 2009. We do not expect any portion of this amount to be paid or settled within the
next twelve months.
In certain circumstances the dates on which we are obligated to make these payments could be
delayed. These amounts will increase to the extent we procure insurance for our satellites or
contract for the construction, launch or lease of additional satellites.
We have not yet procured a contract for the launch of our EchoStar XV satellite. While the cost of
this launch will depend upon the terms and conditions of the contract, we estimate that the cost
could range from approximately $90 million to $120 million, which is not included in the table
above. We anticipate incurring this cost between the current period and the expected launch of the
satellite in late 2010.
On November 6, 2009, our board of directors declared a dividend of $2.00 per share on
our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. The dividend will be payable in cash on December
2, 2009 to shareholders of record on November 20, 2009. Based on the number of shares of our Class
A and B common stock outstanding as of October 23, 2009, we will distribute approximately $894
million in cash to our shareholders as part of the dividend. This dividend is not
included in the table above.
Guarantees
In connection with the Spin-off, we distributed certain satellite lease agreements to EchoStar and
remained the guarantor under those capital leases for payments totaling approximately $444 million
over the next eight years that are not included in the table above.
In addition, during the third quarter of 2009, EchoStar entered into a new satellite transponder
service agreement for Nimiq 5 through 2024. We sublease this capacity from EchoStar and also
guarantee a certain portion of its obligation
20
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
under this agreement through 2019. As of September
30, 2009, the remaining obligation under this agreement was $591 million and is included in the
table above.
As of September 30, 2009, we have not recorded a liability on the balance sheet for any of these
guarantees.
Contingencies
In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a separation agreement with EchoStar, which
provides among other things for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities
resulting from litigation. Under the terms of the separation agreement, EchoStar has assumed
certain liabilities that relate to its business including certain designated liabilities for acts
or omissions prior to the Spin-off. Certain specific provisions govern intellectual property
related claims under which, generally, EchoStar will only be liable for its acts or omissions
following the Spin-off and we will indemnify EchoStar for any liabilities or damages resulting from
intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the Spin-off as well as our acts or
omissions following the Spin-off.
Acacia
During 2004, Acacia Media Technologies (Acacia) filed a lawsuit against us and EchoStar in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit also named DirecTV,
Comcast, Charter, Cox and a number of smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an entity
that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims
recited therein. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992, 5,253,275,
5,550,863, 6,002,720 and 6,144,702, which relate to certain systems and methods for transmission of
digital data. On September 25, 2009, the Court granted summary judgment to defendants on
invalidity grounds, and dismissed the action with prejudice. The plaintiffs have appealed.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C.
During 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. (Broadcast Innovation) filed a lawsuit against us,
EchoStar, DirecTV, Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in United States District Court in
Denver, Colorado. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the 094
patent) and 4,992,066 (the 066 patent). The 094 patent relates to certain methods and devices
for transmitting and receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The
066 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay
television system on removable cards. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast
Innovation leaving us as the only defendant.
During 2004, the judge issued an order finding the 066 patent invalid. Also in 2004, the Court
found the 094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and
Comcast. In 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the 094
patent finding of invalidity and remanded the Charter case back to the District Court. During June
2006, Charter filed a reexamination request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
The Court has stayed the Charter case pending reexamination, and our case has been stayed pending
resolution of the Charter case.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
21
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Channel Bundling Class Action
On September 21, 2007, a purported class of cable and satellite subscribers filed an antitrust
action against us in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The
suit also names as defendants DirecTV, Comcast, Cablevision, Cox, Charter, Time Warner, Inc., Time
Warner Cable, NBC Universal, Viacom, Fox Entertainment Group, and Walt Disney Company. The suit
alleges, among other things, that the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to provide customers with
access only to bundled channel offerings as opposed to giving customers the ability to purchase
channels on an a la carte basis. On October 16, 2009, the Court granted defendants motion to
dismiss with prejudice. The plaintiffs have appealed. We intend to vigorously defend this case.
We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of
any potential liability or damages.
Enron Commercial Paper Investment
During October 2001, we received approximately $40 million from the sale of Enron commercial paper
to a third party broker. That commercial paper was ultimately purchased by Enron. During November
2003, an action was commenced in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York against approximately 100 defendants, including us, who invested in Enrons commercial
paper. On April 7, 2009, we settled the litigation for an immaterial amount.
ESPN
On January 30, 2008, we filed a lawsuit against ESPN, Inc., ESPN Classic, Inc., ABC Cable Networks
Group, Soapnet L.L.C., and International Family Entertainment (collectively ESPN) for breach of
contract in New York State Supreme Court. Our complaint alleges that ESPN failed to provide us
with certain high-definition feeds of the Disney Channel, ESPN News, Toon, and ABC Family. ESPN
asserted a counterclaim, and then filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that we owed
approximately $35 million under the applicable affiliation agreements. We brought a motion to
amend our complaint to assert that ESPN was in breach of certain most-favored-nation provisions
under the affiliation agreements. On April 15, 2009, the trial court granted our motion to amend
the complaint, and granted, in part, ESPNs motion on the counterclaim, finding that we are liable
for some of the amount alleged to be owing but that the actual amount owing is disputed and will
have to be determined at a later date. We will appeal the partial grant of ESPNs motion. Since
the partial grant of ESPNs motion, they have sought an additional $30 million under the applicable
affiliation agreements. We intend to vigorously prosecute and defend this case. We cannot predict
with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential
liability or damages.
Finisar Corporation
Finisar Corporation (Finisar) obtained a $100 million verdict in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas against DirecTV for patent infringement. Finisar alleged that
DirecTVs electronic program guide and other elements of its system infringe United States Patent
No. 5,404,505 (the 505 patent).
During 2006, we and EchoStar, together with NagraStar LLC, filed a Complaint for Declaratory
Judgment in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Finisar that asks
the Court to declare that we do not infringe, and have not infringed, any valid claim of the 505
patent. During April 2008, the Federal Circuit reversed the judgment against DirecTV and ordered a
new trial. On May 19, 2009, the District Court granted summary judgment to DirecTV, and dismissed
the action with prejudice. Finisar is appealing that decision. Our case is stayed until the
DirecTV action is resolved.
We intend to vigorously prosecute this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that
we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages, and/or an injunction
22
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
that could require us to modify our system architecture. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Global Communications
During April 2007, Global Communications, Inc. (Global) filed a patent infringement action
against us and EchoStar in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The
suit alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 6,947,702 (the 702 patent), which relates to
satellite reception. In October 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted our
request for reexamination of the 702 patent and issued an initial Office Action finding that all
of the claims of the 702 patent were invalid. At the request of the parties, the District Court
stayed the litigation until the reexamination proceeding is concluded and/or other Global patent
applications issue.
During June 2009, Global filed a patent infringement action against us and EchoStar in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The suit alleges infringement of
United States Patent No. 7,542,717 (the 717 patent), which relates to satellite reception.
We intend to vigorously defend these cases. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that
we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may
include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Guardian Media
During December 2008, Guardian Media Technologies LTD (Guardian) filed suit against us, EchoStar,
EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., DirecTV and several other defendants in the United States District
Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos.
4,930,158 and 4,930,160. Both patents are expired and relate to certain parental lock features.
On September 9, 2009, Guardian voluntarily dismissed the case against us with prejudice.
Katz Communications
During June 2007, Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. (Katz) filed a patent infringement
action against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
suit alleges infringement of 19 patents owned by Katz. The patents relate to interactive voice
response, or IVR, technology.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Multimedia Patent Trust
On February 13, 2009, Multimedia Patent Trust (MPT) filed suit against us, EchoStar, DirecTV and
several other defendants in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,958,226, 5,227,878, 5,136,377,
5,500,678 and 5,563,593, which relate to video encoding, decoding and compression technology. MPT
is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of
the claims recited therein.
23
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that
we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may
include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree
of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or
damages.
NorthPoint Technology
On July 2, 2009, NorthPoint Technology, Ltd (Northpoint) filed suit against us, EchoStar, and
DirecTV in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging infringement
of United States Patent No. 6,208,636 (the 636 patent). The 636 patent relates to the use of
multiple low-noise block converter feedhorns, or LNBFs, which are antennas used for satellite
reception.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we
currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the
suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Personalized Media Communications
In February 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. filed suit against us, EchoStar and
Motorola, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging
infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,694,490, 5,109,414, 4,965,825, 5,233,654, 5,335,277,
and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Retailer Class Actions
During 2000, lawsuits were filed by retailers in Colorado state and federal courts attempting to
certify nationwide classes on behalf of certain of our retailers. The plaintiffs are requesting
the Courts declare certain provisions of, and changes to, alleged agreements between us and the
retailers invalid and unenforceable, and to award damages for lost incentives and payments, charge
backs, and other compensation. We have asserted a variety of counterclaims. The federal court
action has been stayed during the pendency of the state court action. We filed a motion for
summary judgment on all counts and against all plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a motion for
additional time to conduct discovery to enable them to respond to our motion. The state court
granted limited discovery which ended during 2004. The plaintiffs claimed we did not provide
adequate disclosure during the discovery process. The state court agreed, and denied our motion
for summary judgment as a result. In April 2008, the state court granted plaintiffs class
certification motion and in January 2009, the state court entered an order excluding certain
evidence that we can present at trial based on the prior discovery issues. The state court also
denied plaintiffs request to dismiss our counterclaims. The final impact of the courts
evidentiary ruling cannot be fully assessed at this time. In May 2009, plaintiffs filed a motion
for default judgment based on new allegations of discovery misconduct. We intend to vigorously
defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the lawsuit or
determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
24
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Technology Development Licensing
On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing LLC (TechDev) filed suit against us and
EchoStar in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging
infringement of United States Patent No. 35, 952, which relates to certain favorite channel
features. In July 2009, the Court granted our motion to stay the case pending two re-examination
petitions before the Patent and Trademark Office.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly
features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the
outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Tivo Inc.
During January 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part
and reversed in part the April 2006 jury verdict concluding that certain of our digital video
recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by Tivo. As of September 2008, we had recorded a total
reserve of $132 million on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets to reflect the April 2006 jury
verdict, supplemental damages through September 2006 and pre-judgment interest awarded by the Texas
court, together with the estimated cost of potential further software infringement prior to
implementation of our alternative technology, discussed below, plus interest subsequent to entry of
the judgment. In its January 2008 decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the jurys verdict of
infringement on Tivos software claims, and upheld the award of damages from the District Court.
The Federal Circuit, however, found that we did not literally infringe Tivos hardware claims,
and remanded such claims back to the District Court for further proceedings. On October 6, 2008,
the Supreme Court denied our petition for certiorari. As a result, approximately $105 million of
the total $132 million reserve was released from an escrow account to Tivo.
We also developed and deployed next-generation DVR software. This improved software was
automatically downloaded to our current customers DVRs, and is fully operational (our original
alternative technology). The download was completed as of April 2007. We received written legal
opinions from outside counsel that concluded our original alternative technology does not infringe,
literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, either the hardware or software claims of Tivos
patent. Tivo filed a motion for contempt alleging that we are in violation of the Courts
injunction. We opposed this motion on the grounds that the injunction did not apply to DVRs that
have received our original alternative technology, that our original alternative technology does
not infringe Tivos patent, and that we were in compliance with the injunction.
On June 2, 2009, the District Court granted Tivos contempt motion, finding that our original
alternative technology was not more than colorably different than the products found by the jury to
infringe Tivos patent, that the original alternative technology still infringed the software
claims, and that even if the original alternative technology was non-infringing, the original
injunction by its terms required that we disable DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000
digital set-top boxes in the field. The District Court awarded Tivo $103 million in supplemental
damages and interest for the period from September 2006 to April 2008, based on an assumed $1.25
per subscriber per month royalty rate. We posted a bond to secure that award pending appeal of the
contempt order.
On July 1, 2009, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals granted a permanent stay of the District
Courts contempt order pending resolution of our appeal. In so doing, the Federal Circuit found,
at a minimum, that we had a substantial case on the merits. Oral argument on our appeal of the
contempt ruling took place on November 2, 2009 before three judges of the Federal Circuit.
25
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
The District Court held a hearing on July 28, 2009 on Tivos claims for contempt sanctions, but has
ordered that enforcement of any sanctions award will be stayed pending our appeal of the contempt
order. Tivo sought up to $975 million in contempt sanctions for the period from April 2008 to June
2009 based on, among other things, profits Tivo alleges we made from subscribers using DVRs. We
opposed Tivos request arguing, among other things, that sanctions are inappropriate because we
made good faith efforts to comply with the Courts injunction. We also challenged Tivos
calculation of profits.
On August 3, 2009, the Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO) issued an initial office action
rejecting the software claims of United States Patent No. 6,233,389 (the 389 patent) as being
invalid in light of two prior patents. These are the same software claims that we were found to
have infringed and which underlie the contempt ruling now pending on appeal. We believe that the
PTOs conclusions are relevant to the issues on appeal as well as the pending sanctions proceedings
in the District Court. The PTOs conclusions support our position that our original alternative
technology is more than colorably different than the devices found to infringe by the jury; that
our original alternative technology does not infringe; and that we acted in good faith to design
around Tivos patent.
On September 4, 2009, the District Court partially granted Tivos motion for contempt sanctions.
In partially granting Tivos motion for contempt sanctions, the District Court awarded $2.25 per
DVR subscriber per month for the period from April 2008 to July 2009 (as compared to the award for
supplemental damages for the prior period from September 2006 to April 2008, which was based on an
assumed $1.25 per DVR subscriber per month). By the District Courts estimation, the total award
for the period from April 2008 to July 2009 is approximately $200 million (the enforcement of the
award has been stayed by the District Court pending DISH Networks appeal of the underlying June 2,
2009 contempt order). During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we increased our
total reserve by $132 million and $328 million, respectively, to reflect the supplemental damages and interest for the period from implementation of our original alternative
technology through April 2008 and for the estimated cost of
alleged software infringement (including contempt sanctions for the
period from April 2008 through June 2009) for the
period from April 2008 through September 2009 plus interest. Our total reserve at September 30,
2009 was $360 million and is included in Other accrued expenses on our Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
In light of the District Courts finding of contempt, and its description of the manner in which it
believes our original alternative technology infringed the 389 patent, we are also developing and
testing potential new alternative technology in an engineering environment. As part of EchoStars
development process, EchoStar downloaded one of its design-around options to approximately 125
subscribers for beta testing.
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, we
are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are
unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be required to
eliminate DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000 digital set-top boxes in the field and
cease distribution of digital set-top boxes with DVR functionality. In that event we would be at a
significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality, which
would likely result in a significant decrease in new subscriber additions as well as a substantial
loss of current subscribers. Furthermore, the inability to offer DVR functionality could cause
certain of our distribution channels to terminate or significantly decrease their marketing of DISH
Network services. The adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations if the
District Courts contempt order is upheld is likely to be significant. Additionally, the
supplemental damage award of $103 million and further award of approximately $200 million does not
include damages, contempt sanctions or interest for the period after June 2009. In the event that we are
unsuccessful in our appeal, we could also have to pay substantial additional damages, contempt
sanctions and interest. Depending on the amount of any additional damage or sanction award or any
monetary settlement, we may be required to raise additional capital at a time and in circumstances
in which we would normally not raise capital. Therefore, any capital we raise may be on terms that
are unfavorable to us, which might adversely affect our financial position and results of
operations and might also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms in the future to
fund our own operations and initiatives. We believe the cost of such capital and its terms and
conditions may be substantially less attractive than our previous financings.
26
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
If we are successful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, but
unsuccessful in defending against any subsequent claim in a new action that our original
alternative technology or any potential new alternative technology infringes Tivos patent, we
could be prohibited from distributing DVRs or could be required to modify or eliminate our
then-current DVR functionality in some or all set-top boxes in the field. In that event we would
be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality
and the adverse effect on our business could be material. We could also have to pay substantial
additional damages.
Because both we and EchoStar are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and EchoStar are jointly and
severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. We
have determined that we are obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the
Spin-off to indemnify EchoStar for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. EchoStar
has agreed to contribute an amount equal to its $5 million intellectual property liability limit
under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar have further agreed that EchoStars $5 million
contribution would not exhaust EchoStars liability to us for other intellectual property claims
that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar also agreed that we would each be
entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in
connection with any potential new alternative technology.
Voom
On May 28, 2008, Voom HD Holdings (Voom) filed a complaint against us in New York Supreme Court.
The suit alleges breach of contract arising from our termination of the affiliation agreement we
had with Voom for the carriage of certain Voom HD channels on the DISH Network satellite television
service. In January 2008, Voom sought a preliminary injunction to prevent us from terminating the
agreement. The Court denied Vooms motion, finding, among other things, that Voom was not likely
to prevail on the merits of its case. Voom is claiming over $1.0 billion in damages. We intend to
vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the
suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims
which arise in the ordinary course of business, including among other things, disputes with
programmers regarding fees. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any
of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position, results of operations
or liquidity.
11. Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Equipment leased to customers |
|
$ |
191,778 |
|
|
$ |
203,730 |
|
|
$ |
591,729 |
|
|
$ |
625,769 |
|
Satellites |
|
|
22,184 |
|
|
|
21,581 |
|
|
|
64,247 |
|
|
|
71,596 |
|
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other |
|
|
11,824 |
|
|
|
18,817 |
|
|
|
35,327 |
|
|
|
60,674 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
4,718 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
3,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
228,395 |
|
|
$ |
245,646 |
|
|
$ |
696,988 |
|
|
$ |
766,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales and operating expense categories included in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) do not include depreciation expense
related to satellites or equipment leased to customers.
27
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
12. Related Party Transactions with EchoStar
Following the Spin-off, EchoStar has operated as a separate public company and we have no continued
ownership interest in EchoStar. However, a substantial majority of the voting power of the shares
of both companies is owned beneficially by our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Charles W. Ergen or by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family.
EchoStar is our primary supplier of set-top boxes and digital broadcast operations and our key
supplier of transponder leasing. Generally the prices charged for products and services provided
under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off are based on pricing equal to
EchoStars cost plus a fixed margin (unless noted differently below), which will vary depending on
the nature of the products and services provided. Prior to the Spin-off, these products were
provided and services were performed internally at cost.
In connection with the Spin-off, we and EchoStar also entered into certain transitional services
agreements pursuant to which we obtain certain services and rights from EchoStar, EchoStar obtains
certain services and rights from us, and we and EchoStar have indemnified each other against
certain liabilities arising from our respective businesses. Subsequent to the Spin-off, we also
entered into certain agreements with EchoStar and may enter into additional agreements with
EchoStar in the future. The following is a summary of the terms of the principal agreements that
we have entered into with EchoStar that may have an impact on our financial position and results of
operations.
Equipment sales EchoStar
Remanufactured Receiver Agreement. We entered into a remanufactured receiver agreement with
EchoStar under which EchoStar has the right to purchase remanufactured receivers and accessories
from us for a two-year period ending on January 1, 2010. In August 2009, we and EchoStar agreed to
extend this agreement through January 1, 2011. Under the remanufactured receiver agreement,
EchoStar has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase remanufactured receivers and
accessories from us at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the
equipment purchased. EchoStar may terminate the remanufactured receiver agreement for any reason
upon sixty days written notice to us. We may also terminate this agreement if certain entities
acquire us.
Transitional services and other revenue EchoStar
Transition Services Agreement. We entered into a transition services agreement with EchoStar
pursuant to which EchoStar has the right, but not the obligation, to receive the following services
from us: finance, information technology, benefits administration, travel and event coordination,
human resources, human resources development (training), program management, internal audit, legal,
accounting and tax, and other support services. The fees for the services provided under the
transition services agreement are equal to cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the
nature of the services provided. The transition services agreement has a term of two years ending
on January 1, 2010. EchoStar may terminate the transition services agreement with respect to a
particular service for any reason upon thirty days prior written notice. We and EchoStar have
agreed that following January 1, 2010 EchoStar will continue to have the right, but not the
obligation, to receive from us certain of the services previously provided under the transition
services agreement
pursuant to a Professional Services Agreement between us and EchoStar
for a one-year period and for successive one-year periods thereafter; however,
EchoStar may terminate these services
upon thirty days notice and either party may terminate the
Professional Services Agreement
upon sixty days prior written notice.
Management Services Agreement. We entered into a management services agreement with EchoStar
pursuant to which we make certain of our officers available to provide services (which are
primarily legal and accounting services) to EchoStar. Specifically, Bernard L. Han, R. Stanton
Dodge and Paul W. Orban remain employed by us, but also serve as EchoStars Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, and Senior
Vice President and Controller, respectively. EchoStar makes payments to us based
upon an allocable portion of the personnel costs and expenses incurred by us with respect to such
officers (taking into account wages and fringe benefits). These allocations are based upon the
estimated percentages of time to be spent by our executive officers performing services for
EchoStar under the management services agreement. EchoStar also reimburses us for direct
out-of-pocket costs incurred by us for management services provided to EchoStar. We and EchoStar
evaluate all charges for reasonableness at least annually and make any adjustments to these charges
as we and EchoStar mutually agree upon.
28
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
The management services agreement was for a one year period commencing on January 1, 2008, and
renews automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier (i) by
EchoStar at any time upon at least 30 days prior written notice, (ii) by us at the end of any
renewal term, upon at least 180 days prior notice; or (iii) by us upon written notice to EchoStar,
following certain changes in control. The management services agreement was automatically renewed
for an additional one year term through December 31, 2010.
Real Estate Lease Agreement. During 2008, we subleased space at 185 Varick Street, New York, New
York to EchoStar for a period of approximately seven years. The rent on a per square foot basis
for this sublease was comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in
the same geographic area at the time of the sublease, and EchoStar is responsible for its portion
of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises.
Packout Services Agreement. We entered into a packout services agreement with EchoStar, whereby
EchoStar has the right, but not the obligation, to engage us to package and ship satellite
receivers to customers that are not associated with us. The fees charged by us for the services
provided under the packout services agreement are equal to our cost plus a fixed margin, which
varies depending on the nature of the products and services provided. The original one year term
of the packout services agreement was extended for an additional one year term and expires on
December 31, 2009. EchoStar may terminate this agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior
written notice to us. In the event of an early termination of this agreement, EchoStar will be
entitled to a refund of any unearned fees paid to us for the services. We do not expect to renew
this agreement.
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar
Broadcast Agreement. We entered into a broadcast agreement pursuant to which EchoStar provides us
broadcast services, including teleport services such as transmission and downlinking, channel
origination, and channel management services for a two year period ending on January 1, 2010. We
have the right, but not the obligation, to extend the broadcast agreement annually for up to two
years. We have exercised our right to renew this agreement for an additional year. We may
terminate channel origination services and channel management services for any reason and without
any liability upon sixty days written notice to EchoStar. If we terminate teleport services for a
reason other than EchoStars breach, we must pay EchoStar the aggregate amount of the remainder of
the expected cost of providing the teleport services.
Satellite Capacity Agreements. We entered into satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which we
lease satellite capacity on satellites owned or leased by EchoStar. The fees for the services to
be provided under the satellite capacity agreements are based on spot market prices for similar
satellite capacity and depend, among other things, upon the orbital location of the satellite and
the frequency on which the satellite provides services. Generally, each satellite capacity
agreement will terminate upon the earlier of: (i) the end of life or replacement of the satellite;
(ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date that the transponder on which service is being
provided under the agreement fails; or (iv) January 1, 2010. We expect to enter into agreements
pursuant to which we will continue to lease satellite capacity on certain satellites owned or
leased by EchoStar after January 1, 2010.
Nimiq 5 Lease Agreement. During March 2008, EchoStar entered into a fifteen-year satellite service
agreement with Bell TV, to receive service on 16 DBS transponders on the Nimiq 5 satellite at the
72.7 degree orbital location (the Bell Transponder Agreement). During September 2009, EchoStar
entered into a fifteen-year satellite service agreement with Telesat Canada (Telesat) to receive
service on all 32 DBS transponders on the Nimiq 5 satellite (the Telesat Transponder Agreement).
As disclosed in EchoStars Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 18, 2009, upon the occurrence
of certain events, the Bell Transponder Agreement would terminate and the Telesat Transponder
Agreement would become effective. As of October 8, 2009, the Bell Transponder Agreement terminated
and the Telesat Transponder Agreement became effective. The Nimiq 5 satellite was placed into
service on October 10, 2009.
During March 2008, EchoStar also entered into a satellite service agreement (DISH Bell Agreement)
with us, pursuant to which we will receive service from EchoStar on all of the DBS transponders
covered by the Bell Transponder Agreement. We guaranteed certain obligations of EchoStar under the
Bell Transponder Agreement. During September 2009, EchoStar also entered into a satellite service
agreement (the DISH Telesat Agreement)
29
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
with us, pursuant to which we will receive service from EchoStar on all of the DBS transponders
covered by the Telesat Transponder Agreement. We have also guaranteed certain obligations of
EchoStar under the Telesat Transponder Agreement. See discussions under Guarantees in Note 10.
As disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 18, 2009, upon the occurrence of
certain events, the DISH Bell Agreement and our guarantee of certain obligations of EchoStar under
the Bell Transponder Agreement would terminate and the DISH Telesat Agreement and our guarantee of
certain obligations of EchoStar under the Telesat Transponder Agreement would become effective. As
of October 8, 2009, the DISH Bell Agreement and associated guarantee terminated and the DISH
Telesat Agreement and associated guarantee became effective.
Under the terms of the DISH Telesat Agreement, we will make certain monthly payments to EchoStar
that commenced when the Nimiq 5 satellite was placed into service and continue through the service
term. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH Telesat Agreement, the
service term will expire ten years following the date it was placed in service. Upon expiration of
the initial term we have the option to renew the DISH Telesat Agreement on a year-to-year basis
through the end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite. Upon in-orbit failure or end-of-life of the
Nimiq 5 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service
from EchoStar on a replacement satellite.
QuetzSat-1 Lease Agreement. During November 2008, EchoStar entered into a ten-year satellite
service agreement with SES Latin America S.A (SES), which provides, among other things, for the
provision by SES to EchoStar of service on 32 DBS transponders on the QuetzSat-1 satellite expected
to be placed in service at the 77 degree orbital location. During November 2008, EchoStar also
entered into a transponder service agreement (QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement) with us pursuant
to which we will receive service from EchoStar on 24 of the DBS transponders.
Under the terms of the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement, we will make certain monthly payments to
EchoStar commencing when the QuetzSat-1 satellite is placed into service and continuing through the
service term. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the QuetzSat-1
Transponder Agreement, the service term will expire ten years following the actual service
commencement date. Upon expiration of the initial term, we have the option to renew the QuetzSat-1
Transponder Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite.
Upon a launch failure, in-orbit failure or end-of-life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite, and in certain
other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement
satellite.
TT&C Agreement. We entered into a telemetry, tracking and control (TT&C) agreement pursuant to
which we receive TT&C services from EchoStar for a two year period ending on January 1, 2010. DISH
Network has the right, but not the obligation, to extend the agreement annually for up to two
years. We have exercised our right to renew this agreement for an additional year. The fees for
the services provided under the TT&C agreement are cost plus a fixed margin. We may terminate the
TT&C agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice.
Satellite Procurement Agreement. We entered into a satellite procurement agreement pursuant to
which we have the right, but not the obligation, to engage EchoStar to manage the process of
procuring new satellite capacity for DISH Network. The satellite procurement agreement has a two
year term expiring on January 1, 2010. The fees for the services to be provided under the
satellite procurement agreement are cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature
of the services provided. We may terminate the satellite procurement agreement for any reason upon
sixty days prior written notice. We and EchoStar have agreed that following January 1, 2010, we
will continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to engage EchoStar to manage the process
of procuring new satellite capacity for DISH Network pursuant to a Professional Services Agreement between us and EchoStar
for a one-year period and for successive
one-year periods thereafter; however, we may terminate these services
upon thirty days prior written notice
and either party may terminate the Professional Services Agreement
upon sixty days notice.
Cost of sales subscriber promotion subsidies EchoStar
Receiver Agreement. EchoStar is currently our sole supplier of set-top box receivers. The table
below indicates the dollar value of set-top boxes and other equipment that we purchased from
EchoStar as well as the amount of such purchases that are included in Cost of sales subscriber
promotion subsidies EchoStar on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income (Loss). The remaining amount is included in Inventories, net and Property
and equipment, net on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
30
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Set-top boxes and other
equipment purchased from
EchoStar |
|
$ |
314,362 |
|
|
$ |
461,675 |
|
|
$ |
838,965 |
|
|
$ |
1,134,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set-top boxes and other
equipment purchased from
EchoStar included
in Cost of sales
subscriber promotion
subsidies
EchoStar |
|
$ |
56,293 |
|
|
$ |
53,418 |
|
|
$ |
152,215 |
|
|
$ |
116,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under our receiver agreement with EchoStar, we have the right but not the obligation to purchase
digital set-top boxes and related accessories, and other equipment from EchoStar for a two year
period ending on January 1, 2010. We also have the right, but not the obligation, to extend the
receiver agreement annually for up to two years. We have exercised our right to renew this
agreement for an additional year. The receiver agreement allows us to purchase receivers and
accessories from EchoStar at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the
equipment purchased. Additionally, EchoStar provides us with standard manufacturer warranties for
the goods sold under the receiver agreement. We may terminate the receiver agreement for any
reason upon sixty days written notice to EchoStar. EchoStar may terminate the receiver agreement
if certain entities were to acquire us. The receiver agreement also includes an indemnification
provision, whereby the parties indemnify each other for certain intellectual property matters.
General and administrative EchoStar
Product Support Agreement. We entered into a product support agreement pursuant to which we have
the right, but not the obligation to receive product support from EchoStar (including certain
engineering and technical support services) for all digital set-top boxes and related accessories
that EchoStar has previously sold and in the future may sell to us. The fees for the services
provided under the product support agreement are cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending
on the nature of the services provided. The term of the product support agreement is the economic
life of such receivers and related accessories, unless terminated earlier. We may terminate the
product support agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice. In the event of an
early termination of this agreement, we are entitled to a refund of any unearned fees paid to
EchoStar for the services.
Real Estate Lease Agreements. We have entered into certain lease agreements pursuant to which we
lease certain real estate from EchoStar. The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the
leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same
geographic area, and EchoStar is responsible for its portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and
maintenance of the premises. The term of each of the leases is set forth below:
Inverness Lease Agreement. The lease for certain space at 90 Inverness Circle East in
Englewood, Colorado, is for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010. In August
2009, we and EchoStar agreed to extend this agreement through January 1, 2011.
Meridian Lease Agreement. The lease for all of 9601 S. Meridian Blvd. in Englewood,
Colorado, is for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010 with annual renewal options
for up to three additional years. We have exercised our right to renew this agreement for
an additional year.
Santa Fe Lease Agreement. The lease for all of 5701 S. Santa Fe Dr. in Littleton, Colorado,
is for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010 with annual renewal options for up to
three additional years. We have exercised our right to renew this agreement for an
additional year.
Gilbert Lease Agreement. The lease for certain space at 801 N. DISH Dr. in Gilbert,
Arizona, is for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010 with annual renewal options
for up to three additional years. We do not expect to renew this agreement.
EDN Sublease Agreement. The sublease for certain space at 211 Perimeter Center in Atlanta,
Georgia, is for a period of three years, ending on April 30, 2011.
31
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Services Agreement. We entered into a services agreement pursuant to which we have the right, but
not the obligation, to receive logistics, procurement and quality assurance services from EchoStar.
The fees for the services provided under this services agreement are cost plus a fixed margin,
which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. This agreement has a term of two
years ending on January 1, 2010. We may terminate the services agreement with respect to a
particular service for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice. We and EchoStar have
agreed that following January 1, 2010, we will continue to have the right, but not the obligation,
to receive from EchoStar the services previously provided under the services agreement
pursuant to a Professional Services Agreement between us and EchoStar
for a
one-year period and for successive one-year periods thereafter; however, we may terminate these
services upon thirty days prior written notice and either party may terminate the Professional Services Agreement
upon sixty days notice.
Other Agreements EchoStar
Tax Sharing Agreement. We entered into a tax sharing agreement with EchoStar which governs our
respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the Spin-off with respect to taxes for
the periods ending on or before the Spin-off. Generally, all pre-Spin-off taxes, including any
taxes that are incurred as a result of restructuring activities undertaken to implement the
Spin-off, will be borne by us, and we will indemnify EchoStar for such taxes. However, we will not
be liable for and will not indemnify EchoStar for any taxes that are incurred as a result of the
Spin-off or certain related transactions failing to qualify as tax-free distributions pursuant to
any provision of Section 355 or Section 361 of the Code because of (i) a direct or indirect
acquisition of any of EchoStars stock, stock options or assets, (ii) any action that EchoStar
takes or fails to take or (iii) any action that EchoStar takes that is inconsistent with the
information and representations furnished to the IRS in connection with the request for the private
letter ruling, or to counsel in connection with any opinion being delivered by counsel with respect
to the Spin-off or certain related transactions. In such case, EchoStar will be solely liable for,
and will indemnify us for, any resulting taxes, as well as any losses, claims and expenses. The
tax sharing agreement terminates after the later of the full period of all applicable statutes of
limitations including extensions or once all rights and obligations are fully effectuated or
performed.
Tivo. Because both we and EchoStar are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and EchoStar are jointly
and severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court.
We have determined that we are obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the
Spin-off to indemnify EchoStar for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. EchoStar
has agreed to contribute an amount equal to its $5 million intellectual property liability limit
under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar have further agreed that EchoStars $5 million
contribution would not exhaust EchoStars liability to us for other intellectual property claims
that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar also agreed that we would each be
entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in
connection with any potential new alternative technology.
Other Agreements
On November 4, 2009, Mr. Roger Lynch, became employed by both us and EchoStar as Executive Vice
President. Mr. Lynch will report to Mr. Ergen and will be responsible for the development and
implementation of advanced technologies that are of potential utility and importance to both us and
EchoStar. Mr. Lynchs compensation will consist of cash and equity compensation and will be borne
by both EchoStar and us.
13. Subsequent Events
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011
On October 5, 2009, we repaid our $25 million 3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011.
32
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Dividend
On November 6, 2009, our board of directors
declared a dividend of $2.00 per share on
our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. The
dividend will be payable in cash on December
2, 2009 to shareholders of record on November 20, 2009. Based on the number of shares of our Class
A and B common stock outstanding as of October 23, 2009, we will distribute approximately $894
million in cash to our shareholders as part of the dividend.
33
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations together with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to
the financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report. This managements discussion
and analysis is intended to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, changes in
financial condition and results of our operations and contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but
rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about our
industry, business and future financial results. Our actual results could differ materially from
the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including
those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, under the caption Item 1A. Risk Factors.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overview
DISH Network added approximately 241,000 and 173,000 net new subscribers during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Our third quarter performance was positively
impacted by our sales and marketing promotions and reduced churn. Our churn was positively
impacted by, among other things, the second quarter 2009 completion of our security access device
replacement program, an increase in our new subscriber commitment period and initiatives to retain
subscribers. Historically, we have experienced slightly higher churn in the months following the
expiration of programming commitments for new subscribers. In February 2008, we extended the
required new subscriber programming commitment from 18 to 24 months. In the third quarter of 2009,
due to the change in promotional mix, we have fewer expiring
subscriber commitments. Current economic conditions have negatively
impacted our subscriber growth. We continue to focus on addressing operational issues specific
to DISH Network which we believe will contribute to long-term subscriber growth.
Subscriber-related expenses have continued to increase and ARPU has been negatively impacted by
promotional discounts on programming offered to new subscribers and our initiatives to retain
subscribers, all of which negatively impact our subscriber-related margins. In addition,
Subscriber-related expenses continued to be negatively impacted by increased programming costs,
initiatives to retain subscribers and migrate certain subscribers to free up transponder capacity,
and improve customer service.
The current overall economic environment has negatively impacted many industries including
ours. In addition, the overall growth rate in the pay-TV industry has slowed in recent years as
the penetration of pay-TV households approaches 90%. Within this maturing industry, competition
has intensified with the rapid growth of fiber-based pay-TV services offered by telecommunications
companies. Furthermore, new internet protocol television (IPTV) products/services have begun to
impact the pay-TV industry and such products/services will become more viable competition over time
as their quality improves. In spite of these factors that have impacted the entire pay-TV
industry, certain of our competitors have been able to achieve relatively strong subscriber growth
in the current environment.
While economic factors have impacted the entire pay-TV industry, our relative performance has been
mostly driven by issues specific to DISH Network. In recent years, DISH Networks position as the
low cost provider in the pay-TV industry has been eroded by increasingly aggressive promotional
pricing used by our competitors to attract new subscribers and similarly aggressive promotions and
tactics used to retain existing subscribers. Some competitors have been especially aggressive and
effective in marketing their service. Furthermore, our subscriber growth has been adversely
affected by signal theft and other forms of fraud and by operational inefficiencies at DISH
Network. We have not always met our own standards for performing high quality installations,
effectively resolving customer issues when they arise, answering customer calls in an acceptable
timeframe, effectively communicating with our subscriber base, reducing calls driven by the
complexity of our business, improving the reliability of certain systems and subscriber equipment,
and aligning the interests of certain third party retailers and installers to provide high quality
service.
Our distribution relationship with AT&T was a substantial contributor to our gross and net
subscriber additions over the past several years, accounting for approximately 17% of our gross
subscriber additions for the year ended December 31, 2008. This distribution relationship ended
January 31, 2009. Consequently, beginning with the second quarter 2009, AT&T no longer contributes
to our gross subscriber additions. In addition, nearly one million of our current subscribers were
acquired through our distribution relationship with AT&T and subscribers acquired
34
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
through this channel have historically churned at a higher rate than our overall subscriber base.
Although AT&T is not permitted to target these subscribers for transition to another pay-TV service
and we and AT&T are required to maintain bundled billing and cooperative customer service for these
subscribers, these subscribers may still churn at higher than historical rates following
termination of the AT&T distribution relationship.
We have been investing more in advanced technology equipment as part of our subscriber acquisition
and retention efforts. Recent initiatives to transmit certain programming only in MPEG-4 and to
activate most new subscribers only with MPEG-4 receivers have accelerated our deployment of MPEG-4
receivers. To meet current demand, we have increased the rate at which we upgrade existing
subscribers to HD and DVR receivers. While these efforts may increase our subscriber acquisition
and retention costs, we believe that they will help reduce subscriber churn and costs over the long
run.
We have also been changing equipment to migrate certain subscribers to free up transponder capacity
in support of HD and other initiatives. We expect to continue these initiatives through 2010. We
believe that the benefit from the increase in available transponder capacity outweighs the
short-term cost of these equipment changes.
To combat signal theft and improve the security of our broadcast system, we recently completed the
replacement of our security access devices to re-secure our system. We expect additional future
replacements of these devices to be necessary to keep our system secure. To combat other forms of
fraud, we have taken a wide range of actions including terminating retailers that we believe were
in violation of DISH Networks business rules. While these initiatives may inconvenience our
subscribers and disrupt our distribution channels in the short-term, we believe that the long-term
benefits will outweigh the costs.
To address our operational inefficiencies, we continue to make significant investments in staffing,
training, information systems, and other initiatives, primarily in our call center and in-home
service businesses. These investments are intended to help combat inefficiencies introduced by the
increasing complexity of our business, improve customer satisfaction, reduce churn, increase
productivity, and allow us to scale better over the long run. We cannot, however, be certain that
our increased spending will ultimately be successful in yielding such returns. In the meantime, we
may continue to incur higher costs as a result of both our operational inefficiencies and increased
spending. The adoption of these measures has contributed to higher expenses and lower margins.
While we believe that the increased costs will be outweighed by longer-term benefits, there can be
no assurance when or if we will realize these benefits at all.
Programming costs represent a large percentage of our Subscriber-related expenses. As a result,
our margins may face further downward pressure from price increases and the renewal of long-term
programming contracts on less favorable pricing terms.
Over the long run, we plan to use Slingbox placeshifting technology and other technologies to
maintain and enhance our competitiveness. We may also partner with or acquire companies whose
lines of business are complementary to ours should attractive opportunities arise.
Liquidity Drivers
Like many companies, we make general investments in property such as satellites, information
technology and facilities that support our overall business. As a subscriber-based company,
however, we also make customer-specific investments to acquire new subscribers and retain existing
subscribers. While the general investments may be deferred without impacting the business in the
short-term, the customer-specific investments are less discretionary. Our overall objective is to
generate sufficient cash flow over the life of each subscriber to provide an adequate return
against the upfront investment. Once the upfront investment has been made for each subscriber, the
subsequent cash flow is generally positive.
From a company standpoint, there are a number of factors that impact our future cash flow compared
to the cash flow we generate at a given point in time. The first factor is how successful we are
at retaining our current subscribers. As we lose subscribers from our existing base, the positive
cash flow from that base is correspondingly reduced. The second factor is how successful we are at
maintaining our subscriber-related margins. To the extent our Subscriber-related expenses grow
faster than our Subscriber-related revenue, the amount of cash flow that is
35
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
generated per existing subscriber is reduced. The third factor is the rate at which we acquire new
subscribers. The faster we acquire new subscribers, the more our positive ongoing cash flow from
existing subscribers is offset by the negative upfront cash flow associated with new subscribers.
Finally, our future cash flow is impacted by the rate at which we make general investments and any
cash flow from financing activities.
Our customer-specific investments to acquire new subscribers have a significant impact on our cash
flow. While fewer subscribers might translate into lower ongoing cash flow in the long-term, cash
flow is actually aided in the short-term by the reduction in customer-specific investment spending.
As a result, a slow down in our business due to external or internal factors does not introduce
the same level of short-term liquidity risk as it might in other industries.
Availability of Credit and Effect on Liquidity
While the ability to raise capital has generally existed for DISH Network even during the recent
market turmoil, the cost of such capital has not been as attractive as in prior periods. Because
of the cash flow situation of our company and the absence of any material debt payments over the
next two years, the higher cost of capital will not impact our current operational plans. However,
we might be less likely than we would otherwise be to pursue initiatives which could increase
shareholder value over the long run, such as making strategic investments, prepaying debt, or
buying back our own stock. Alternatively, if we decided to still pursue such initiatives, the cost
of doing so would be greater. Currently, we have no existing lines of credit, nor have we
historically.
Future Liquidity
Our Subscriber-related expenses as a percentage of Subscriber-related revenue grew from 51.4%
to 52.2% in 2008 and reached 54.7% during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, mainly as a
result of an increase in Subscriber-related expenses. Our Subscriber-related expenses
continued to be negatively impacted by initiatives to retain subscribers, migrate certain
subscribers to free up transponder capacity and improve customer service. In addition, our
Subscriber-related revenue was negatively impacted by our increase in the use of promotional
discounts on programming offered to new subscribers and retention initiatives offered to existing
subscribers. Uncertainties about these trends may impact our cash flow and results of operations.
In addition, although our subscribers have recently grown, we continue to be impacted by
operational issues specific to DISH Network, as previously discussed.
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, we
are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are
unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be required to
eliminate DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000 digital set-top boxes in the field and
cease distribution of digital set-top boxes with DVR functionality. In that event we would be at a
significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality, which
would likely result in a significant decrease in new subscriber additions as well as a substantial
loss of current subscribers. Furthermore, the inability to offer DVR functionality could cause
certain of our distribution channels to terminate or significantly decrease their marketing of DISH
Network services. The adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations if the
District Courts contempt order is upheld is likely to be significant. Additionally, the
supplemental damage award of $103 million and further award of approximately $200 million does not
include damages, contempt sanctions or interest for the period after June 2009. In the event that we are
unsuccessful in our appeal, we could also have to pay substantial additional damages, contempt
sanctions and interest. Depending on the amount of any additional damage or sanction award or any
monetary settlement, we may be required to raise additional capital at a time and in circumstances
in which we would normally not raise capital. Therefore, any capital we raise may be on terms that
are unfavorable to us, which might adversely affect our financial position and results of
operations and might also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms in the future to
fund our own operations and initiatives. We believe the cost of such capital and its terms and
conditions may be substantially less attractive than our previous financings.
If we are successful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, but
unsuccessful in defending against any subsequent claim in a new action that our original
alternative technology or any potential new alternative technology infringes Tivos patent, we
could be prohibited from distributing DVRs or could be required to modify or eliminate our
then-current DVR functionality in some or all set-top boxes in the field. In that event we
36
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
would be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR
functionality and the adverse effect on our business could be material. We could also have to pay
substantial additional damages.
Because both we and EchoStar are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and EchoStar are jointly and
severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. We
have determined that we are obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the
Spin-off to indemnify EchoStar for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. EchoStar
has agreed to contribute an amount equal to its $5 million intellectual property liability limit
under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar have further agreed that EchoStars $5 million
contribution would not exhaust EchoStars liability to us for other intellectual property claims
that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar also agreed that we would each be
entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in
connection with any potential new alternative technology.
The Spin-off
On January 1, 2008, we completed the separation of the assets and businesses we historically owned
and operated into two companies (the Spin-off):
|
|
|
DISH Network Corporation which retained its DISH Network® subscription television
business, and |
|
|
|
|
EchoStar Corporation (EchoStar) which sells equipment, including set-top boxes and
related components, to DISH Network and international customers, and provides digital
broadcast operations and satellite services to DISH Network and other customers. |
DISH Network and EchoStar now operate as separate publicly traded companies, and neither entity has
any ownership interest in the other. However, a substantial majority of the voting power of both
companies is owned beneficially by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer or by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit
of his family. In connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into certain agreements with
EchoStar to define responsibility for obligations relating to, among other things, set-top box
sales, transition services, taxes, employees and intellectual property, which impact several of our
key operating metrics. The fees we pay to EchoStar to access assets or receive certain services
following the Spin-off, after taking into account the cost savings realized from the Spin-off, have
not had a significant impact on our operations. Subsequent to the Spin-off, we have entered into
certain other agreements with EchoStar and may enter into additional agreements with EchoStar in
the future.
EXPLANATION OF KEY METRICS AND OTHER ITEMS
Subscriber-related revenue. Subscriber-related revenue consists principally of revenue from
basic, premium movie, local, pay-per-view, Latino and international subscription television
services, equipment rental fees and other hardware related fees, including fees for DVRs and
additional outlet fees from subscribers with multiple receivers, advertising services, fees earned
from our DishHOME Protection Plan, equipment upgrade fees, HD programming and other subscriber
revenue. Certain of the amounts included in Subscriber-related revenue are not recurring on a
monthly basis.
Equipment sales and other revenue. Equipment sales and other revenue principally includes the
non-subsidized sales of DBS accessories to retailers and other third-party distributors of our
equipment domestically and to DISH Network subscribers.
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar. Equipment sales,
transitional services and other revenue EchoStar includes revenue related to equipment sales,
and transitional services and other agreements with EchoStar associated with the Spin-off.
Subscriber-related expenses. Subscriber-related expenses principally include programming
expenses, costs incurred in connection with our in-home service and call center operations, billing
costs, refurbishment and repair costs related to receiver systems, subscriber retention and other
variable subscriber expenses.
37
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar. Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar
includes the cost of digital broadcast operations provided to us by EchoStar, including satellite
uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional access management, telemetry, tracking and
control and other professional services. In addition, this category includes the cost of leasing
satellite and transponder capacity on satellites from EchoStar.
Satellite and transmission expenses other. Satellite and transmission expenses other
includes executory costs associated with capital leases and costs associated with transponder
leases and other related services.
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales. Equipment, transitional services and
other cost of sales principally includes the cost of non-subsidized sales of DBS accessories to
retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically and to DISH Network subscribers. In
addition, this category includes costs related to equipment sales, transitional services and other
agreements with EchoStar associated with the Spin-off.
Subscriber acquisition costs. In addition to leasing receivers, we generally subsidize
installation and all or a portion of the cost of our receiver systems in order to attract new DISH
Network subscribers. Our Subscriber acquisition costs include the cost of these receiver systems
sold to retailers and other distributors of our equipment, the cost of these receiver systems sold
directly by us to subscribers, net costs related to our promotional incentives, and costs related
to installation and acquisition advertising. We exclude the value of equipment capitalized under
our lease program for new subscribers from Subscriber acquisition costs.
SAC. Management believes subscriber acquisition cost measures are commonly used by those
evaluating companies in the pay-TV industry. We are not aware of any uniform standards for
calculating the average subscriber acquisition costs per new subscriber activation, or SAC, and
we believe presentations of SAC may not be calculated consistently by different companies in the
same or similar businesses. Our SAC is calculated as Subscriber acquisition costs, plus the
value of equipment capitalized under our lease program for new subscribers, divided by gross
subscriber additions. We include all the costs of acquiring subscribers (e.g., subsidized and
capitalized equipment) as our management believes it is a more comprehensive measure of how much we
are spending to acquire subscribers. We also include all new DISH Network subscribers in our
calculation, including DISH Network subscribers added with little or no subscriber acquisition
costs.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consists primarily of
employee-related costs associated with administrative services such as legal, information systems,
accounting and finance, including non-cash, stock-based compensation expense. It also includes
outside professional fees (e.g., legal, information systems and accounting services) and other
items associated with facilities and administration.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
primarily includes interest expense, prepayment premiums and amortization of debt issuance costs
associated with our senior debt and convertible subordinated debt securities (net of capitalized
interest) and interest expense associated with our capital lease obligations.
Other, net. The main components of Other, net are unrealized gains and losses from changes in
fair value of non-marketable strategic investments accounted for at fair value, equity in earnings
and losses of our affiliates, gains and losses realized on the sale of investments, and impairment
of marketable and non-marketable investment securities.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). EBITDA is defined as
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders plus Interest expense net of
Interest income, Taxes and Depreciation and amortization. This non-GAAP measure is
reconciled to Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders in our
discussion of Results of Operations below.
DISH Network subscribers. We include customers obtained through direct sales, and third-party
retailers and other distribution relationships in our DISH Network subscriber count. We also
provide DISH Network service to hotels, motels and other commercial accounts. For certain of these
commercial accounts, we divide our total revenue for these commercial accounts by an amount
approximately equal to the retail price of our Classic Bronze 100 programming package (but taking
into account, periodically, price changes and other factors), and include the resulting number,
which is substantially smaller than the actual number of commercial units served, in our DISH
38
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Network subscriber count. Previously, our end of period DISH Network subscriber count was rounded
down to the nearest five thousand. However, beginning December 31, 2008, we round to the nearest
one thousand.
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU). We are not aware of any uniform standards for
calculating ARPU and believe presentations of ARPU may not be calculated consistently by other
companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate average monthly revenue per subscriber,
or ARPU, by dividing average monthly Subscriber-related revenue for the period (total
Subscriber-related revenue during the period divided by the number of months in the period) by
our average DISH Network subscribers for the period. Average DISH Network subscribers are
calculated for the period by adding the average DISH Network subscribers for each month and
dividing by the number of months in the period. Average DISH Network subscribers for each month
are calculated by adding the beginning and ending DISH Network subscribers for the month and
dividing by two.
Average monthly subscriber churn rate. We are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating
subscriber churn rate and believe presentations of subscriber churn rates may not be calculated
consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate subscriber
churn rate for any period by dividing the number of DISH Network subscribers who terminated service
during the period by the average monthly DISH Network subscribers during the period, and further
dividing by the number of months in the period. When calculating subscriber churn, as is the case
when calculating ARPU, the number of subscribers in a given month is based on the average of the
beginning-of-month and the end-of-month subscriber counts.
Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as Net cash flows from operating activities less
Purchases of property and equipment, as shown on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
39
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Statements of Operations Data |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related revenue |
|
$ |
2,862,554 |
|
|
$ |
2,886,157 |
|
|
$ |
(23,603 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Equipment sales and other revenue |
|
|
23,393 |
|
|
|
41,918 |
|
|
|
(18,525 |
) |
|
|
(44.2 |
) |
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar |
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
8,706 |
|
|
|
(2,506 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
2,892,147 |
|
|
|
2,936,781 |
|
|
|
(44,634 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related expenses |
|
|
1,623,397 |
|
|
|
1,534,133 |
|
|
|
89,264 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
56.7 |
% |
|
|
53.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar |
|
|
78,911 |
|
|
|
76,848 |
|
|
|
2,063 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and transmission expenses Other |
|
|
8,962 |
|
|
|
7,651 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales |
|
|
28,651 |
|
|
|
69,315 |
|
|
|
(40,664 |
) |
|
|
(58.7 |
) |
Subscriber acquisition costs |
|
|
439,590 |
|
|
|
437,766 |
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
157,648 |
|
|
|
147,582 |
|
|
|
10,066 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
% of Total revenue |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tivo litigation expense |
|
|
131,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,930 |
|
|
NM |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
228,395 |
|
|
|
245,646 |
|
|
|
(17,251 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
2,697,484 |
|
|
|
2,518,941 |
|
|
|
178,543 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
194,663 |
|
|
|
417,840 |
|
|
|
(223,177 |
) |
|
|
(53.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,591 |
|
|
|
16,609 |
|
|
|
(9,018 |
) |
|
|
(54.3 |
) |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(98,857 |
) |
|
|
(101,802 |
) |
|
|
2,945 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(1,915 |
) |
|
|
(106,055 |
) |
|
|
104,140 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(93,181 |
) |
|
|
(191,248 |
) |
|
|
98,067 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
101,482 |
|
|
|
226,592 |
|
|
|
(125,110 |
) |
|
|
(55.2 |
) |
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
|
|
(20,989 |
) |
|
|
(134,697 |
) |
|
|
113,708 |
|
|
|
84.4 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
59.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
80,493 |
|
|
|
91,895 |
|
|
|
(11,402 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
80,562 |
|
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
(11,333 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH Network subscribers, as of period end (in millions) |
|
|
13.851 |
|
|
|
13.780 |
|
|
|
0.071 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
DISH Network subscriber additions, gross (in millions) |
|
|
0.887 |
|
|
|
0.825 |
|
|
|
0.062 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
DISH Network subscriber additions, net (in millions) |
|
|
0.241 |
|
|
|
(0.010 |
) |
|
|
0.251 |
|
|
NM |
|
Average monthly subscriber churn rate |
|
|
1.57 |
% |
|
|
2.02 |
% |
|
|
(0.45 |
%) |
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU) |
|
$ |
69.51 |
|
|
$ |
69.82 |
|
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Average subscriber acquisition cost per subscriber (SAC) |
|
$ |
694 |
|
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
EBITDA |
|
$ |
421,212 |
|
|
$ |
557,431 |
|
|
$ |
(136,219 |
) |
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
40
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Overview. Revenue totaled $2.892 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease
of $45 million or 1.5% compared to the same period in 2008. Net income (loss) attributable to
DISH Network common shareholders totaled $81 million, a decrease of $11 million or 12.3%.
DISH Network added approximately 241,000 net new subscribers during the three months ended
September 30, 2009. Our third quarter performance was positively impacted by our sales and
marketing promotions and reduced churn. Our churn was positively impacted by, among other things,
the second quarter 2009 completion of our security access device replacement program, an increase
in our new subscriber commitment period and initiatives to retain subscribers. Historically, we
have experienced slightly higher churn in the months following the expiration of programming
commitments for new subscribers. In February 2008, we extended the required new subscriber
programming commitment from 18 to 24 months. In the third quarter of 2009, due to the change in
promotional mix, we have fewer expiring subscriber commitments. Current economic conditions have negatively
impacted our subscriber growth. We continue to focus on addressing operational issues specific to DISH Network which we
believe will contribute to long-term subscriber growth. Subscriber-related expenses have
continued to increase and ARPU has been negatively impacted by promotional discounts on programming
offered to new subscribers and our initiatives to retain subscribers, all of which negatively
impact our subscriber-related margins. In addition, Subscriber-related expenses continued to be
negatively impacted by increased programming costs, initiatives to retain subscribers and migrate
certain subscribers to free up transponder capacity, and improve customer service.
DISH Network subscribers. As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately 13.851 million DISH
Network subscribers compared to approximately 13.780 million subscribers at September 30, 2008, an
increase of 0.5%. DISH Network added approximately 887,000 gross new subscribers for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, compared to approximately 825,000 gross new subscribers during the
same period in 2008, an increase of 7.5%.
DISH Network added approximately 241,000 net new subscribers during the three months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to a loss of approximately 10,000 net new subscribers during the same
period in 2008. Our percentage monthly subscriber churn for the three months ended September 30,
2009 was 1.57%, compared to 2.02% for the same period in 2008. We believe this increase in net new
subscribers and the decrease in churn primarily resulted from the factors discussed in the
Overview above. Although churn declined during the quarter, given the increasingly competitive
nature of our industry and the current economic conditions, we may not be able to continue to
reduce churn without increasing our spending on customer retention incentives, which would have a
negative effect on our results of operations and free cash flow.
We believe our gross and net subscriber additions as well as our subscriber churn have been
negatively impacted by weaker economic conditions, aggressive promotional and retention offerings
by our competition, the loss of our distribution relationship with AT&T discussed below, the heavy
marketing of HD service by our competition, the growth of fiber-based and Internet-based pay TV
providers, signal theft and other forms of fraud, and operational inefficiencies at DISH Network.
We have not always met our own standards for performing high quality installations, effectively
resolving customer issues when they arise, answering customer calls in an acceptable timeframe,
effectively communicating with our customer base, reducing calls driven by the complexity of our
business, improving the reliability of certain systems and customer equipment, and aligning the
interests of certain third party retailers and installers with our interests to provide high
quality service. Most of these factors have affected both gross new subscriber additions as well
as existing subscriber churn. Our future gross subscriber additions and subscriber churn may
continue to be negatively impacted by these factors, which could in turn adversely affect our
revenue growth.
Our distribution relationship with AT&T was a substantial contributor to our gross and net
subscriber additions over the past several years, accounting for approximately 17% of our gross
subscriber additions for the year ended December 31, 2008. This distribution relationship ended
January 31, 2009. Consequently, beginning with the second quarter 2009, AT&T no longer contributes
to our gross subscriber additions. In addition, nearly one million of our current subscribers were
acquired through our distribution relationship with AT&T and subscribers acquired through this
channel have historically churned at a higher rate than our overall subscriber base. Although AT&T
is not permitted to target these subscribers for transition to another pay-TV service and we and
AT&T are required to maintain bundled billing and cooperative customer service for these
subscribers, these subscribers may still churn at higher than historical rates following
termination of the AT&T distribution relationship.
41
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Subscriber-related revenue. DISH Network Subscriber-related revenue totaled $2.863 billion for
the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $24 million or 0.8% compared to the same
period in 2008. This change was primarily related to the decrease in ARPU discussed below.
ARPU. Monthly average revenue per subscriber was $69.51 during the three months ended September
30, 2009 versus $69.82 during the same period in 2008. ARPU is driven by a number of factors
including, among other things, price increases and penetration rates of our programming and
hardware offerings and promotional discounts on programming. The $0.31 or 0.4% decrease in ARPU was primarily
attributable to an increase in the amount of promotional discounts on programming offered to our
new subscribers and retention initiatives offered to existing subscribers, and a decrease in
premium movie revenue. This decrease was partially offset by price increases in February 2009 to
existing subscribers on some of our most popular programming packages, an increase in revenue from
local programming and changes in the sales mix toward HD programming packages and advanced hardware
offerings. As a result of our current promotions, which provide an incentive for advanced hardware
offerings, we continue to see increased hardware related fees, which include fees earned from our
DishHOME Protection Plan, rental fees and fees for DVRs.
Equipment sales and other revenue. Equipment sales and other revenue totaled $23 million during
the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $19 million or 44.2% compared to the same
period 2008. The decrease in Equipment sales and other revenue primarily resulted from lower
non-subsidized sales of DBS accessories and digital converter boxes in 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008.
Subscriber-related expenses. Subscriber-related expenses totaled $1.623 billion during the three
months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $89 million or 5.8% compared to the same period
2008. The increase in Subscriber-related expenses was primarily attributable to higher costs for
programming content and call center operations. The increase in programming content costs was
primarily related to price increases in certain of our programming contracts and the renewal of
certain contracts at higher rates. The increases related to call center operations were driven in
part by our investments in staffing, training, information systems, and other initiatives. These
investments are intended to help combat inefficiencies introduced by the increasing complexity of
our business and technology, improve customer satisfaction, reduce churn, increase productivity,
and allow us to better scale our business over the long run. We cannot, however, be certain that
our increased spending will ultimately yield these benefits. In the meantime, we may continue to
incur higher costs as a result of both our operational inefficiencies and increased spending.
Subscriber-related expenses represented 56.7% and 53.2% of Subscriber-related revenue during
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in this expense to
revenue ratio primarily resulted from the increase in Subscriber-related expenses and lower
Subscriber-related revenue discussed above.
In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts to purchase programming content in which
our payment obligations are fully contingent on the number of subscribers to whom we provide the
respective content. Our programming expenses will continue to increase to the extent we are
successful in growing our subscriber base. In addition, our Subscriber-related expenses may face
further upward pressure from price increases and the renewal of long-term programming contracts on
less favorable pricing terms.
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales. Equipment, transitional services and
other cost of sales totaled $29 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009, a
decrease of $41 million or 58.7% compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease in
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales primarily resulted from a decline in
charges for slow moving and obsolete inventory and lower non-subsidized sales of DBS accessories
and digital converter boxes in 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Subscriber acquisition costs. Subscriber acquisition costs totaled $440 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $2 million or 0.4% compared to the same period in
2008. This increase was primarily attributable to the increase in gross new subscribers discussed
previously, partially offset by lower SAC discussed below.
SAC. SAC was $694 during the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $735 during the
same period in 2008, a decrease of $41, or 5.6%. This decrease was primarily attributable to a
change in sales mix, a decrease in
42
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
advertising costs and hardware costs per activation. The decrease in hardware cost per activation
principally related to a reduction in manufacturing costs, partially offset by an increase in
deployment of more advanced set-top boxes, such as HD receivers and HD DVRs.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the amount of equipment capitalized
under our lease program for new subscribers totaled $176 million and $169 million, respectively.
This increase in capital expenditures under our lease program for new subscribers resulted
primarily from the increase in gross new subscribers, partially offset by lower hardware
costs per activation, discussed above.
Capital expenditures resulting from our equipment lease program for new subscribers have been, and
are expected to continue to be, partially mitigated by, among other things, the redeployment of
equipment returned by disconnecting lease program subscribers. However, to remain competitive we
upgrade or replace subscriber equipment periodically as technology changes, and the costs
associated with these upgrades may be substantial. To the extent technological changes render a
portion of our existing equipment obsolete, we would be unable to redeploy all returned equipment
and consequently would realize less benefit from the SAC reduction associated with redeployment of
that returned lease equipment.
Our SAC calculation does not reflect any benefit from payments we received in connection with
equipment not returned to us from disconnecting lease subscribers and returned equipment that is
made available for sale rather than being redeployed through our lease programs. During the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, these amounts totaled $15 million and $34 million,
respectively.
Several years ago, we began deploying receivers that utilize 8PSK modulation technology and
receivers that utilize MPEG-4 compression technology. These technologies, when fully deployed,
will allow more programming channels to be carried over our existing satellites. A majority of our
customers today, however, do not have receivers that use MPEG-4 compression and a smaller but still
significant percentage do not have receivers that use 8PSK modulation. We may choose to invest
significant capital to accelerate the conversion of customers to MPEG-4 and/or 8PSK in order to
realize the bandwidth benefits sooner. In addition, given that all of our HD content is broadcast
in MPEG-4, any growth in HD penetration will naturally accelerate our transition to these newer
technologies and may increase our subscriber acquisition and retention costs. All new receivers
that we purchase from EchoStar now have MPEG-4 technology. Although we continue to refurbish and
redeploy MPEG-2 receivers, as a result of our HD initiatives and current promotions, we currently
activate most new customers with higher priced MPEG-4 technology. This limits our ability to
redeploy MPEG-2 receivers and, to the extent that our promotions are successful, will accelerate
the transition to MPEG-4 technology, resulting in an adverse effect on our SAC.
Our Subscriber acquisition costs and SAC may materially increase in the future to the extent
that we transition to newer technologies, introduce more aggressive promotions, or provide greater
equipment subsidies. See further discussion under Liquidity and Capital Resources Subscriber
Acquisition and Retention Costs.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses totaled $158 million
during the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $10 million or 6.8% compared to
the same period in 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to additional costs to support
the DISH Network television service including personnel costs and professional fees. General and
administrative expenses represented 5.5% and 5.0% of Total revenue during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in the ratio of the expenses to Total
revenue was primarily attributable to the decrease in Total revenue and the increase in expenses
discussed above.
Tivo litigation expense. We recorded $132 million of additional Tivo litigation
expense during the three months ended September 30, 2009 for supplemental damages, contempt
sanctions and interest. See Note 10 in the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for further discussion.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $228 million
during the three months ended September 30, 2009, a $17 million or 7.0% decrease compared to the
same period in 2008. The decrease in Depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to
the declines in depreciation expense related to set-top boxes used in our lease programs, and
depreciation expense associated with our satellites. The decrease in
43
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
expense related to set-top boxes resulted from an increase in the number of fully-depreciated
set-top boxes still in service and in the capitalization of new advanced equipment which has a
longer estimated useful life. The satellite depreciation expense declined due to the retirements
of satellites from commercial service, partially offset by depreciation expense associated with
Ciel II which was placed in service in February 2009.
Interest income. Interest income totaled $8 million during the three months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease of $9 million or 54.3% compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease
principally resulted from lower percentage returns earned on our cash and marketable investment
securities and lower average cash and marketable investment securities balances during the third
quarter of 2009.
Other, net. Other, net expense totaled $2 million during the three months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease of $104 million compared to the same period in 2008. During the third quarter of
2008, we recorded impairments of $156 million on marketable and other investment securities,
partially offset by a $53 million gain on the sale of a non-marketable investment.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $421 million during the
three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $136 million or 24.4% compared to the same
period in 2008. EBITDA for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was negatively impacted by
the $132 million Tivo litigation expense. The following table reconciles EBITDA to the
accompanying financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
421,212 |
|
|
$ |
557,431 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
91,266 |
|
|
|
85,193 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit), net |
|
|
20,989 |
|
|
|
134,697 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
228,395 |
|
|
|
245,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
80,562 |
|
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net
income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used as a measurement of
operating efficiency and overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful measure
for those evaluating companies in the pay-TV industry. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of
income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital
expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Income tax (provision) benefit, net. Our income tax provision was $21 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $114 million compared to the same period in 2008.
The decrease in the provision was primarily related to the decrease in Income (loss) before income
taxes and a decrease in our effective tax rate. During the three months ended September 30, 2009,
our effective tax rate was positively impacted by prior period adjustments totaling $25 million.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, our effective tax rate was negatively impacted by
the establishment of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets related to the impairment of
marketable and non-marketable investment securities, partially offset by reductions in our accrual
for uncertain tax positions.
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders. Net income (loss)
attributable to DISH Network common shareholders was $81 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2009, a decrease of $11 million compared to $92 million for the same period in 2008.
The decrease was primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and expenses discussed above.
44
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Statements of Operations Data |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related revenue |
|
$ |
8,605,608 |
|
|
$ |
8,572,163 |
|
|
$ |
33,445 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Equipment sales and other revenue |
|
|
74,876 |
|
|
|
95,755 |
|
|
|
(20,879 |
) |
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar |
|
|
20,685 |
|
|
|
28,247 |
|
|
|
(7,562 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
8,701,169 |
|
|
|
8,696,165 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related expenses |
|
|
4,705,551 |
|
|
|
4,402,771 |
|
|
|
302,780 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
54.7 |
% |
|
|
51.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar |
|
|
246,866 |
|
|
|
232,798 |
|
|
|
14,068 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and transmission expenses Other |
|
|
24,701 |
|
|
|
22,890 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales |
|
|
96,244 |
|
|
|
131,488 |
|
|
|
(35,244 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
Subscriber acquisition costs |
|
|
1,120,065 |
|
|
|
1,184,138 |
|
|
|
(64,073 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
450,434 |
|
|
|
412,104 |
|
|
|
38,330 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
% of Total revenue |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tivo litigation expense |
|
|
328,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,335 |
|
|
NM |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
696,988 |
|
|
|
766,260 |
|
|
|
(69,272 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
7,669,184 |
|
|
|
7,152,449 |
|
|
|
516,735 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,031,985 |
|
|
|
1,543,716 |
|
|
|
(511,731 |
) |
|
|
(33.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
23,637 |
|
|
|
44,082 |
|
|
|
(20,445 |
) |
|
|
(46.4 |
) |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(273,926 |
) |
|
|
(284,845 |
) |
|
|
10,919 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(42,072 |
) |
|
|
(124,583 |
) |
|
|
82,511 |
|
|
|
66.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(292,361 |
) |
|
|
(365,346 |
) |
|
|
72,985 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
739,624 |
|
|
|
1,178,370 |
|
|
|
(438,746 |
) |
|
|
(37.2 |
) |
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
|
|
(283,027 |
) |
|
|
(492,007 |
) |
|
|
208,980 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
38.3 |
% |
|
|
41.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
456,597 |
|
|
|
686,363 |
|
|
|
(229,766 |
) |
|
|
(33.5 |
) |
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
456,666 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
$ |
(229,697 |
) |
|
|
(33.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH Network subscribers, as of period end (in millions) |
|
|
13.851 |
|
|
|
13.780 |
|
|
|
0.071 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
DISH Network subscriber additions, gross (in millions) |
|
|
2.271 |
|
|
|
2.308 |
|
|
|
(0.037 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
DISH Network subscriber additions, net (in millions) |
|
|
0.173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.173 |
|
|
NM |
|
Average monthly subscriber churn rate |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
(0.15 |
%) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU) |
|
$ |
70.09 |
|
|
$ |
69.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Average subscriber acquisition cost per subscriber (SAC) |
|
$ |
689 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
EBITDA |
|
$ |
1,686,970 |
|
|
$ |
2,185,393 |
|
|
$ |
(498,423 |
) |
|
|
(22.8 |
) |
45
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Subscriber-related revenue. DISH Network Subscriber-related revenue totaled $8.606 billion for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $33 million or 0.4% compared to the same
period in 2008. This increase was primarily related to subscriber growth and the increase in
ARPU discussed below.
ARPU. Monthly average revenue per subscriber was $70.09 during the nine months ended September 30,
2009 versus $69.04 during the same period in 2008. The $1.05 or 1.5% increase in ARPU was
primarily attributable to price increases in February 2009 and 2008 on some of our most popular
programming packages and changes in the sales mix toward HD programming packages and advanced
hardware offerings. As a result of our current promotions, which provide an incentive for advanced
hardware offerings, we continue to see increased hardware related fees, which include fees earned
from our DishHOME Protection Plan, rental fees and fees for DVRs. These increases were partially
offset by increases in the amount of promotional discounts on programming offered to our new
subscribers and retention initiatives offered to existing subscribers, and by decreases in
pay-per-view buys and premium movie revenue.
Equipment sales and other revenue. Equipment sales and other revenue totaled $75 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $21 million or 21.8% compared to the same
period 2008. The decrease in Equipment sales and other revenue primarily resulted from lower
non-subsidized sales of DBS accessories in 2009.
Subscriber-related expenses. Subscriber-related expenses totaled $4.706 billion during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $303 million or 6.9% compared to the same period
2008. The increase in Subscriber-related expenses was primarily attributable to higher costs
for: (i) programming content partially offset by a non-recurring programming expense adjustment of
approximately $27 million, (ii) call center operations, and (iii) customer retention. The increase
in programming content costs was primarily related to price increases in certain of our programming
contracts and the renewal of certain contracts at higher rates. The increases related to call
center operations were driven in part by our investments in staffing, training, information
systems, and other initiatives. These investments are intended to help combat inefficiencies
introduced by the increasing complexity of our business and technology, improve customer
satisfaction, reduce churn, increase productivity, and allow us to better scale our business over
the long run. We cannot, however, be certain that our increased spending will ultimately yield
these benefits. In the meantime, we may continue to incur higher costs as a result of both our
operational inefficiencies and increased spending. The increase in customer retention expense was
primarily driven by more upgrades of existing customers to HD and DVR receivers and the equipment
replacement to migrate certain subscribers to free up transponder capacity to support HD
programming and other initiatives. We expect to continue these initiatives through 2010. We
believe that the benefit from the increase in available transponder capacity outweighs the
short-term cost of these equipment changes. Subscriber-related expenses represented 54.7% and
51.4% of Subscriber-related revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The increase in this expense to revenue ratio primarily resulted from the increase
in Subscriber-related expenses discussed above, partially offset by an increase in ARPU.
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar. Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar
totaled $247 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $14 million or
6.0% compared to the same period during 2008. This change was primarily attributable to an
increase in uplink services provided by EchoStar related to the launch of Ciel II which commenced
commercial operations in February 2009 and continued expansion of our HD local markets, partially
offset by a decrease in the transponder capacity leased from EchoStar.
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales. Equipment, transitional services and
other cost of sales totaled $96 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a
decrease of $35 million or 26.8% compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease in Equipment,
transitional services and other cost of sales primarily resulted from lower non-subsidized sales
of DBS accessories and a decline in charges for slow moving and obsolete inventory in 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008.
Subscriber acquisition costs. Subscriber acquisition costs totaled $1.120 billion for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $64 million or 5.4% compared to the same period in
2008. This decrease was primarily attributable to the decrease in SAC discussed below and the
decline in gross new subscribers.
46
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
SAC. SAC was $689 during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $715 during the same
period in 2008, a decrease of $26, or 3.6%. This decrease was primarily attributable to a change
in sales mix and a decrease in hardware costs per activation. The decrease in hardware cost per
activation principally related to a reduction in manufacturing costs, partially offset by an
increase in deployment of more advanced set-top boxes, such as HD receivers and HD DVRs and
additional advertising costs per activation during the period.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the amount of equipment capitalized under
our lease program for new subscribers totaled $444 million and $467 million, respectively. This
decrease in capital expenditures under our lease programs for new subscribers resulted primarily
from lower gross subscriber additions and lower hardware costs per activation.
Our SAC calculation does not reflect any benefit from payments we received in connection with
equipment not returned to us from disconnecting lease subscribers and returned equipment that is
made available for sale rather than being redeployed through our lease program. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, these amounts totaled $78 million and $96 million,
respectively.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses totaled $450 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $38 million or 9.3% compared to the
same period in 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to additional costs to support the
DISH Network television service including personnel costs and professional fees. General and
administrative expenses represented 5.2% and 4.7% of Total revenue during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in the ratio of the expenses to Total
revenue was primarily attributable to the changes in Total revenue and the expenses discussed
above.
Tivo litigation expense. We recorded $328 million of Tivo litigation expense during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 for supplemental damages, contempt sanctions and interest.
See Note 10 in the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $697 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a $69 million or 9.0% decrease compared to the same
period in 2008. The decrease in Depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to the
declines in depreciation expense related to set-top boxes used in our lease programs and
depreciation expense associated with our satellites, and the abandonment of a software development
project designed to support our IT systems during 2008. The decrease in expense related to set-top
boxes resulted from an increase in the number of fully-depreciated set-top boxes still in service
and in the capitalization of new advanced equipment which has a longer estimated useful life. The
satellite depreciation expense declined due to the retirements of satellites from commercial
service, partially offset by depreciation expense associated with Ciel II which was placed in
service in February 2009.
Interest income. Interest income totaled $24 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease of $20 million compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease principally
resulted from lower percentage returns earned on our cash and marketable investment securities and
lower average cash and marketable investment securities balances during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Other, net. Other, net expense totaled $42 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease of $83 million compared to the same period in 2008. This change primarily
resulted from a decrease of $133 million of impairments on marketable and other investment
securities, partially offset by a $53 million gain on the sale of a non-marketable investment
during 2008.
47
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $1.687 billion during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $498 million or 22.8% compared to the same
period in 2008. EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was negatively impacted by the
$328 million Tivo litigation expense. The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
1,686,970 |
|
|
$ |
2,185,393 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
250,289 |
|
|
|
240,763 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit), net |
|
|
283,027 |
|
|
|
492,007 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
696,988 |
|
|
|
766,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders |
|
$ |
456,666 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net
income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used as a measurement of
operating efficiency and overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful measure
for those evaluating companies in the pay-TV industry. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of
income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital
expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Income tax (provision) benefit, net. Our income tax provision was $283 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $209 million compared to the same period in
2008. The decrease in the provision was primarily related to the decrease in Income (loss) before
income taxes and a decrease in our effective tax rate. During the nine months ended September 30,
2009, our effective tax rate was positively impacted by prior period adjustments totaling $25
million, partially offset by the establishment of valuation allowances against certain deferred tax
assets that are capital in nature. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our effective
tax rate was negatively impacted by the establishment of valuation allowances against deferred tax
assets related to the impairment of marketable and non-marketable investment securities, partially
offset by reductions in our accrual for uncertain tax positions.
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH Network common shareholders. Net income (loss)
attributable to DISH Network common shareholders was $457 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, a decrease of $230 million compared to $686 million for the same period in
2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and expenses discussed
above.
48
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Current Marketable Investment Securities
We consider all liquid investments purchased within 90 days of their maturity to be cash
equivalents. See Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for
further discussion regarding our marketable investment securities. As of September 30, 2009, our
cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities totaled $2.633 billion
compared to $559 million as of December 31, 2008, an increase of $2.074 billion. This increase
in cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities was primarily related to
an increase in cash generated from operations of $1.892 billion and the net proceeds of $971
million related to our 7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019 issued in August 2009, partially offset by
capital expenditures of $724 million.
In addition, on October 5, 2009, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of additional
7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019.
We have investments in various debt and equity instruments including corporate bonds, corporate
equity securities, government bonds, and variable rate demand notes (VRDNs). VRDNs are long-term
floating rate municipal bonds with embedded put options that allow the bondholder to sell the
security at par plus accrued interest. All of the put options are secured by a pledged liquidity
source. Our VRDN portfolio is comprised of many municipalities and financial institutions that
serve as the pledged liquidity source. While they are classified as marketable investment
securities, the put option allows VRDNs to be liquidated on a same day or on a five business day
settlement basis. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we held VRDNs with fair values
of $1.663 billion and $240 million, respectively.
On November 6, 2009, our board of directors
declared a dividend of $2.00 per share on
our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. The
dividend will be payable in cash on December
2, 2009 to shareholders of record on November 20, 2009. Based on the number of shares of our Class
A and B common stock outstanding as of October 23, 2009, we will distribute approximately $894
million in cash to our shareholders as part of the dividend.
The following discussion highlights our cash flow activities during the nine months ended September
30, 2009.
Cash Flow
Cash flows from operating activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we reported net cash flows from operating activities
of $1.892 billion. This amount is primarily comprised of net income adjusted for Depreciation and
amortization of $1.154 billion. In addition, our operating cash flow was positively impacted by
timing differences between book expense and cash payments related to the Tivo litigation charge of
$328 million, and other changes in working capital of $272 million mainly related to a decrease in
inventory and an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Cash flows from investing activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we reported net cash outflows from investing
activities of $2.770 billion primarily related to net purchases of marketable investment securities
of $1.940 billion, capital expenditures totaling $724 million, increases in restricted cash and
marketable investment securities of $58 million and purchases of strategic investments of $47
million. The capital expenditures included $622 million associated with our subscriber acquisition
and retention lease programs, $67 million of non-discretionary spending for satellite capital
expenditures and $35 million of other corporate capital expenditures. The increase in restricted
cash and marketable investment securities primarily related to our litigation with Tivo.
49
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Cash flows from financing activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we reported net cash flows from financing activities
of $935 million primarily resulting from the net proceeds of $971 million related to our 7 7/8%
Senior Notes due 2019 issued in August 2009, partially offset by common stock repurchases of $19
million and debt repayments of $20 million.
Free Cash Flow
We define free cash flow as Net cash flows from operating activities less Purchases of property
and equipment, as shown on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We believe free
cash flow is an important liquidity metric because it measures, during a given period, the amount
of cash generated that is available to repay debt obligations, make investments, fund acquisitions
and for certain other activities. Free cash flow is not a measure determined in accordance with
GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for Operating income, Net income, Net cash
flows from operating activities or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. Since
free cash flow includes investments in operating assets, we believe this non-GAAP liquidity measure
is useful in addition to the most directly comparable GAAP measure Net cash flows from operating
activities.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, free cash flow was significantly impacted
by changes in operating assets and liabilities as shown in the Net cash flows from operating
activities section of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included herein.
Operating asset and liability balances can fluctuate significantly from period to period and there
can be no assurance that free cash flow will not be negatively impacted by material changes in
operating assets and liabilities in future periods, since these changes depend upon, among other
things, managements timing of payments and control of inventory levels, and cash receipts. In
addition to fluctuations resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities, free cash flow
can vary significantly from period to period depending upon, among other things, subscriber growth,
subscriber revenue, subscriber churn, subscriber acquisition costs including amounts capitalized
under our equipment lease programs, operating efficiencies, increases or decreases in purchases of
property and equipment and other factors.
The following table reconciles free cash flow to Net cash flows from operating activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Free cash
flow |
|
$ |
1,167,413 |
|
|
$ |
981,122 |
|
Add back: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
724,316 |
|
|
|
844,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
1,891,729 |
|
|
$ |
1,825,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber Churn
Our subscriber churn rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was 1.71% and
1.86%, respectively. Our ability to retain our current subscribers impacts our future cash flow.
As we lose subscribers from our existing base, the positive cash flow from that base is
correspondingly reduced.
Our distribution relationship with AT&T was a substantial contributor to our gross and net
subscriber additions over the past several years, accounting for approximately 17% of our gross
subscriber additions for the year ended December 31, 2008. This distribution relationship ended
January 31, 2009. Consequently, beginning with the second quarter 2009, AT&T no longer contributes
to our gross subscriber additions. In addition, nearly one million of our current subscribers were
acquired through our distribution relationship with AT&T and subscribers acquired through this
channel have historically churned at a higher rate than our overall subscriber base. Although AT&T
is
not permitted to target these subscribers for transition to another pay-TV service and we and AT&T
are required to maintain bundled billing and cooperative customer service for these subscribers,
these subscribers may still churn at higher than historical rates following termination of the AT&T
distribution relationship.
50
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Subscriber Acquisition and Retention Costs
We incur significant up-front costs to acquire subscribers, including advertising, retailer
incentives, equipment, installation, and new customer promotions. While we attempt to recoup these
up-front costs over the lives of their subscription, there can be no assurance that we will. We
deploy business rules such as credit requirements and commitments to receive service for a minimum
term, and we strive to provide outstanding customer service, to increase the likelihood of
customers keeping their DISH Network service over longer periods of time. Our subscriber
acquisition costs may vary significantly from period to period.
We incur significant costs to retain our existing customers, mostly by upgrading their equipment to
HD and DVR receivers. As with our subscriber acquisition costs, our retention spending includes
the cost of equipment and installation. We also offer free programming and/or promotional pricing
for limited periods for existing customers in exchange for a commitment. A component of our
retention efforts includes the installation of equipment for customers who move. Our subscriber
retention costs may vary significantly from period to period.
Satellites
Operation of our subscription television service requires that we have adequate satellite
transmission capacity for the programming we offer. Moreover, current competitive conditions
require that we continue to expand our offering of new programming, particularly by expanding local
HD coverage and offering more HD national channels. While we generally have had in-orbit satellite
capacity sufficient to transmit our existing channels and some backup capacity to recover the
transmission of certain critical programming, our backup capacity is limited. In the event of a
failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may need to acquire or lease additional satellite
capacity or relocate one of our other satellites and use it as a replacement for the failed or lost
satellite. Such a failure could result in a prolonged loss of critical programming or a
significant delay in our plans to expand programming as necessary to remain competitive and cause
us to expend a significant portion of our cash to acquire or lease additional satellite capacity.
Security Systems
Increases in theft of our signal, or our competitors signals, could in addition to reducing new
subscriber activations, also cause subscriber churn to increase. We use microchips embedded in
credit card-sized access cards, called smart cards, or security chips in our receiver systems to
control access to authorized programming content (Security Access Devices). Our signal
encryption has been compromised in the past and may be compromised in the future even though we
continue to respond with significant investment in security measures, such as Security Access
Device replacement programs and updates in security software, that are intended to make signal
theft more difficult. It has been our prior experience that security measures may be only
effective for short periods of time or not at all and that we remain susceptible to additional
signal theft. During the second quarter of 2009, we completed the replacement of our Security
Access Devices and expect additional future replacements of these devices to be necessary to keep
our system secure. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in reducing or controlling
theft of our programming content and we may incur additional costs in the future if our Security
Access Device replacement plan is not effective.
Other
We are also vulnerable to fraud, particularly in the acquisition of new subscribers. While we are
addressing the impact of subscriber fraud through a number of actions, including eliminating
certain payment options for subscribers, there can be no assurance that we will not continue to
experience fraud which could impact our subscriber growth and churn. The current economic downturn
may create greater incentive for signal theft and subscriber fraud, which could lead to higher
subscriber churn and reduced revenue.
Stock Repurchases
Our board of directors previously authorized stock repurchases of up to $1.0 billion of our Class A
common stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we repurchased 1.9 million shares
of our common stock for $19 million. On November 3, 2009, our board of directors extended the plan
and authorized an increase in the maximum
51
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
dollar value of shares that may be repurchased under the
plan, such that we are currently authorized to repurchase up to $1.0 billion of our outstanding
shares through and including December 31, 2010.
Obligations and Future Capital Requirements
Contractual Obligations
As of September 30, 2009, future maturities of our debt and contractual obligations are summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
5,818,287 |
|
|
$ |
26,181 |
|
|
$ |
4,142 |
|
|
$ |
1,004,375 |
|
|
$ |
4,622 |
|
|
$ |
504,183 |
|
|
$ |
4,274,784 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
309,535 |
|
|
|
4,886 |
|
|
|
22,382 |
|
|
|
21,054 |
|
|
|
20,582 |
|
|
|
22,646 |
|
|
|
217,985 |
|
Interest expense on long-term
debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
2,695,287 |
|
|
|
118,866 |
|
|
|
438,690 |
|
|
|
433,780 |
|
|
|
368,089 |
|
|
|
365,985 |
|
|
|
969,877 |
|
Satellite-related obligations |
|
|
1,639,821 |
|
|
|
81,900 |
|
|
|
116,795 |
|
|
|
107,082 |
|
|
|
154,222 |
|
|
|
154,005 |
|
|
|
1,025,817 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
120,285 |
|
|
|
12,032 |
|
|
|
45,753 |
|
|
|
25,220 |
|
|
|
19,402 |
|
|
|
9,817 |
|
|
|
8,061 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
1,342,570 |
|
|
|
1,093,823 |
|
|
|
194,480 |
|
|
|
19,160 |
|
|
|
15,450 |
|
|
|
15,827 |
|
|
|
3,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,925,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,337,688 |
|
|
$ |
822,242 |
|
|
$ |
1,610,671 |
|
|
$ |
582,367 |
|
|
$ |
1,072,463 |
|
|
$ |
6,500,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above does not include $246 million of liabilities associated with unrecognized tax
benefits which were accrued and are included on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
September 30, 2009. We do not expect any portion of this amount to be paid or settled within the
next twelve months.
In certain circumstances the dates on which we are obligated to make these payments could be
delayed. These amounts will increase to the extent we procure insurance for our satellites or
contract for the construction, launch or lease of additional satellites.
We have not yet procured a contract for the launch of our EchoStar XV satellite. While the cost of
this launch will depend upon the terms and conditions of the contract, we estimate that the cost
could range from approximately $90 million to $120 million, which is not included in the table
above. We anticipate incurring this cost between the current period and the expected launch of the
satellite in late 2010.
On November 6, 2009, our board of directors declared a dividend of $2.00 per share on
our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. The
dividend will be payable in cash on December
2, 2009 to shareholders of record on November 20, 2009. Based on the number of shares of our Class
A and B common stock outstanding as of October 23, 2009, we will distribute approximately $894
million in cash to our shareholders as part of the dividend. This dividend is not
included in the table above.
Future Capital Requirements
We expect to fund our future working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements
from cash generated from operations, existing cash and marketable investment securities balances,
and cash generated through new additional capital. The amount of capital required to fund our
future working capital and capital expenditure needs varies, depending on, among other things, the
rate at which we acquire new subscribers and the cost of subscriber acquisition and retention,
including capitalized costs associated with our new and existing subscriber equipment lease
programs. The majority of our capital expenditures for 2009 are driven by the costs associated
with subscriber premises equipment, included in our firm purchase obligations, as well as capital
expenditures for our satellite-
related obligations. These expenditures are necessary to operate and maintain the DISH Network
television service. Consequently, we consider them to be non-discretionary. The amount of capital
required will also depend on the levels of investment necessary to support potential strategic
initiatives, including our plans to expand our national and local HD offerings and other strategic
opportunities that may arise from time to time. Our capital expenditures vary depending on the
number of satellites leased or under construction at any point in time, and could increase
materially as a result of increased competition, significant satellite failures, or continued
general economic downturn. These factors could require that we raise additional capital in the
future.
52
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, we
are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are
unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be required to
eliminate DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000 digital set-top boxes in the field and
cease distribution of digital set-top boxes with DVR functionality. In that event we would be at a
significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality, which
would likely result in a significant decrease in new subscriber additions as well as a substantial
loss of current subscribers. Furthermore, the inability to offer DVR functionality could cause
certain of our distribution channels to terminate or significantly decrease their marketing of DISH
Network services. The adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations if the
District Courts contempt order is upheld is likely to be significant. Additionally, the
supplemental damage award of $103 million and further award of approximately $200 million does not
include damages, contempt sanctions or interest for the period after June 2009. In the event that we are
unsuccessful in our appeal, we could also have to pay substantial additional damages, contempt
sanctions and interest. Depending on the amount of any additional damage or sanction award or any
monetary settlement, we may be required to raise additional capital at a time and in circumstances
in which we would normally not raise capital. Therefore, any capital we raise may be on terms that
are unfavorable to us, which might adversely affect our financial position and results of
operations and might also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms in the future to
fund our own operations and initiatives. We believe the cost of such capital and its terms and
conditions may be substantially less attractive than our previous financings.
If we are successful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, but
unsuccessful in defending against any subsequent claim in a new action that our original
alternative technology or any potential new alternative technology infringes Tivos patent, we
could be prohibited from distributing DVRs or could be required to modify or eliminate our
then-current DVR functionality in some or all set-top boxes in the field. In that event we would
be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality
and the adverse effect on our business could be material. We could also have to pay substantial
additional damages.
Because both we and EchoStar are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and EchoStar are jointly and
severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. We
have determined that we are obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the
Spin-off to indemnify EchoStar for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. EchoStar
has agreed to contribute an amount equal to its $5 million intellectual property liability limit
under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar have further agreed that EchoStars $5 million
contribution would not exhaust EchoStars liability to us for other intellectual property claims
that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar also agreed that we would each be
entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in
connection with any potential new alternative technology.
From time to time we evaluate opportunities for strategic investments or acquisitions that may
complement our current services and products, enhance our technical capabilities, improve or
sustain our competitive position, or otherwise offer growth opportunities. We may make investments
in or partner with others to expand our business into mobile and portable video, data and voice
services. Future material investments or acquisitions may require that we obtain additional
capital, assume third party debt or incur other long-term obligations.
In 2008, we paid $712 million to acquire certain 700 MHz wireless licenses, which were granted to
us by the FCC in February 2009. In order to commercialize these licenses and satisfy FCC build-out
requirements, we may be required to make significant additional investments or partner with others.
Depending on the nature and scope of such commercialization and build-out, our investment could
vary significantly. Part or all of our licenses may be terminated for failure to satisfy FCC
build-out requirements. We currently plan to perform a market test to evaluate different
technologies and consumer acceptance during 2010.
Recent developments in the financial markets have made it more difficult for issuers of high yield
indebtedness, such as us, to access capital markets at acceptable terms. These developments may
have a significant effect on our cost of financing and our liquidity position.
A portion of our investment portfolio is invested in asset backed securities, auction rate
securities, mortgage backed securities, special investment vehicles and strategic investments and
as a result a portion of our portfolio has restricted liquidity. Liquidity in the markets for
these investments has been impacted in the past year and these
53
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
market conditions have adversely
affected our liquidity. In addition, certain of these securities have defaulted or have been
materially downgraded, causing us to record impairment charges. If the credit ratings of these
securities further deteriorate or the lack of liquidity in the marketplace becomes prolonged, we
may be required to record further impairment charges. Moreover, the current significant volatility
of domestic and global financial markets has greatly affected the volatility and value of our
marketable investment securities. To the extent we require access to funds, we may need to sell
these securities under unfavorable market conditions, record further impairment charges and fall
short of our financing needs.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than the Guarantees disclosed in Note 10 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements, we generally do not engage in off-balance sheet financing activities.
54
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risks Associated With Financial Instruments
Our investments and debt are exposed to market risks, discussed below.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Current Marketable Investment Securities
As of September 30, 2009, our cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities
had a fair value of $2.633 billion. Of that amount, a total of $2.421 billion was invested in:
(a) cash; (b) debt instruments of the United States Government and its agencies; (c) commercial
paper and corporate notes with an overall average maturity of less than one year and rated in one
of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating
organizations; and (d) instruments with similar risk, duration and credit quality characteristics
to the commercial paper described above. The primary purpose of these investing activities has
been to preserve principal until the cash is required to, among other things, fund operations, make
strategic investments and expand the business. Consequently, the size of this portfolio fluctuates
significantly as cash is received and used in our business. The value of this portfolio is
negatively impacted by credit losses; however, this risk is mitigated through diversification that
limits our exposure to any one issuer.
Interest Rate Risk
A change in interest rates would affect the fair value of our cash, cash equivalents and current
marketable investment securities portfolio. Based on our September 30, 2009 current non-strategic
investment portfolio of $2.421 billion, a hypothetical 10% increase in average interest rates would
result in a decrease of approximately $28 million in fair value of this portfolio. We normally
hold these investments to maturity; however, the hypothetical loss in fair value would be realized
if we sold the investments prior to maturity.
Our cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities had an average annual rate
of return for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of 1.0%. A change in interest rates would
affect our future annual interest income from this portfolio, since funds would be re-invested at
different rates as the instruments mature. A hypothetical 10% decrease in average interest rates
during 2009 would result in a decrease of approximately $1 million in annual interest income.
Strategic Marketable Investment Securities
As of September 30, 2009, we held strategic and financial debt and equity investments of public
companies with a fair value of $212 million. These investments, which are held for strategic and
financial purposes, are concentrated in a small number of companies, are highly speculative and
have experienced and continue to experience volatility. The fair value of our strategic and
financial debt and equity investments can be significantly impacted by the risk of adverse changes
in securities markets generally, as well as risks related to the performance of the companies whose
securities we have invested in, risks associated with specific industries, and other factors.
These investments are subject to significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of
the securities markets and of the underlying businesses. In general, the debt instruments held in
our strategic marketable investment securities portfolio are not significantly impacted by interest
rate fluctuations as their value is more closely related to factors specific to the underlying
business. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the price of our public strategic debt and equity
investments would result in a decrease of approximately $21 million in the fair value of these
investments.
Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities and Noncurrent Marketable and Other Investment
Securities
Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities
As of September 30, 2009, we had $142 million of restricted cash and marketable investment
securities invested in: (a) cash; (b) debt instruments of the United States Government and its
agencies; (c) commercial paper and corporate notes with an overall average maturity of less than
one year and rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least
55
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Continued
two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations; and (d) instruments with similar risk,
duration and credit quality characteristics to the commercial paper described above. Based on our
September 30, 2009 investment portfolio, a hypothetical 10% increase in average interest rates
would not have a material impact in the fair value of our restricted cash and marketable investment
securities.
Noncurrent Auction Rate and Mortgage Backed Securities
As of September 30, 2009, we held investments in auction rate securities (ARS) and mortgage
backed securities (MBS) of $119 million, which are reported at fair value. Events in the credit
markets have reduced or eliminated current liquidity for certain of our ARS and MBS investments.
As a result, we classify these investments as noncurrent assets as we intend to hold these
investments until they recover or mature, and therefore interest rate risk associated with these
securities is mitigated. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the price of these investments would
result in a decrease of approximately $12 million in the fair value of these investments.
Other Investment Securities
As of September 30, 2009, we had $50 million of nonpublic debt and equity instruments that we hold
for strategic business purposes. We account for these investments under the cost, equity and fair
value methods of accounting.
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly
traded depends on the success of those companies businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient
capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public
markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that
when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them. A hypothetical 10%
adverse change in the price of these nonpublic debt and equity instruments would result in a
decrease of approximately $5 million in the fair value of these investments.
Fixed Rate Debt, Mortgages and Other Notes Payable
As of September 30, 2009, we had fixed-rate debt, mortgages and other notes payable of $5.818
billion on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We estimated the fair value of this debt to
be approximately $5.846 billion using quoted market prices for our publicly traded debt, which
constitutes approximately 99% of our debt. The fair value of our debt is affected by fluctuations
in interest rates. A hypothetical 10% decrease in assumed interest rates would increase the fair
value of our debt by approximately $189 million. To the extent interest rates increase, our costs
of financing would increase at such time as we are required to refinance our debt. As of September
30, 2009, a hypothetical 10% increase in assumed interest rates would increase our annual interest
expense by approximately $41 million.
Derivative Financial Instruments
In general, we do not use derivative financial instruments for hedging or speculative purposes, but
we may do so in the future.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
the end of the period covered by this report.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during our most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
56
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a separation agreement with EchoStar, which
provides among other things for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities
resulting from litigation. Under the terms of the separation agreement, EchoStar has assumed
certain liabilities that relate to its business including certain designated liabilities for acts
or omissions prior to the Spin-off. Certain specific provisions govern intellectual property
related claims under which, generally, EchoStar will only be liable for its acts or omissions
following the Spin-off and we will indemnify EchoStar for any liabilities or damages resulting from
intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the Spin-off as well as our acts or
omissions following the Spin-off.
Acacia
During 2004, Acacia Media Technologies (Acacia) filed a lawsuit against us and EchoStar in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit also named DirecTV,
Comcast, Charter, Cox and a number of smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an entity
that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims
recited therein. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992, 5,253,275,
5,550,863, 6,002,720 and 6,144,702, which relate to certain systems and methods for transmission of
digital data. On September 25, 2009, the Court granted summary judgment to defendants on
invalidity grounds, and dismissed the action with prejudice. The plaintiffs have appealed.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C.
During 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. (Broadcast Innovation) filed a lawsuit against us,
EchoStar, DirecTV, Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in United States District Court in
Denver, Colorado. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the 094
patent) and 4,992,066 (the 066 patent). The 094 patent relates to certain methods and devices
for transmitting and receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The
066 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay
television system on removable cards. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast
Innovation leaving us as the only defendant.
During 2004, the judge issued an order finding the 066 patent invalid. Also in 2004, the Court
found the 094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and
Comcast. In 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the 094
patent finding of invalidity and remanded the Charter case back to the District Court. During June
2006, Charter filed a reexamination request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
The Court has stayed the Charter case pending reexamination, and our case has been stayed pending
resolution of the Charter case.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
57
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Channel Bundling Class Action
On September 21, 2007, a purported class of cable and satellite subscribers filed an antitrust
action against us in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The
suit also names as defendants DirecTV, Comcast, Cablevision, Cox, Charter, Time Warner, Inc., Time
Warner Cable, NBC Universal, Viacom, Fox Entertainment Group, and Walt Disney Company. The suit
alleges, among other things, that the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to provide customers with
access only to bundled channel offerings as opposed to giving customers the ability to purchase
channels on an a la carte basis. On October 16, 2009, the Court granted defendants motion to
dismiss with prejudice. The plaintiffs have appealed. We intend to vigorously defend this case.
We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of
any potential liability or damages.
Enron Commercial Paper Investment
During October 2001, we received approximately $40 million from the sale of Enron commercial paper
to a third party broker. That commercial paper was ultimately purchased by Enron. During November
2003, an action was commenced in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York against approximately 100 defendants, including us, who invested in Enrons commercial
paper. On April 7, 2009, we settled the litigation for an immaterial amount.
ESPN
On January 30, 2008, we filed a lawsuit against ESPN, Inc., ESPN Classic, Inc., ABC Cable Networks
Group, Soapnet L.L.C., and International Family Entertainment (collectively ESPN) for breach of
contract in New York State Supreme Court. Our complaint alleges that ESPN failed to provide us
with certain high-definition feeds of the Disney Channel, ESPN News, Toon, and ABC Family. ESPN
asserted a counterclaim, and then filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that we owed
approximately $35 million under the applicable affiliation agreements. We brought a motion to
amend our complaint to assert that ESPN was in breach of certain most-favored-nation provisions
under the affiliation agreements. On April 15, 2009, the trial court granted our motion to amend
the complaint, and granted, in part, ESPNs motion on the counterclaim, finding that we are liable
for some of the amount alleged to be owing but that the actual amount owing is disputed and will
have to be determined at a later date. We will appeal the partial grant of ESPNs motion. Since
the partial grant of ESPNs motion, they have sought an additional $30 million under the applicable
affiliation agreements. We intend to vigorously prosecute and defend this case. We cannot predict
with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential
liability or damages.
Finisar Corporation
Finisar Corporation (Finisar) obtained a $100 million verdict in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas against DirecTV for patent infringement. Finisar alleged that
DirecTVs electronic program guide and other elements of its system infringe United States Patent
No. 5,404,505 (the 505 patent).
During 2006, we and EchoStar, together with NagraStar LLC, filed a Complaint for Declaratory
Judgment in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Finisar that asks
the Court to declare that we do not infringe, and have not infringed, any valid claim of the 505
patent. During April 2008, the Federal Circuit reversed the judgment against DirecTV and ordered a
new trial. On May 19, 2009, the District Court granted summary judgment to DirecTV, and dismissed
the action with prejudice. Finisar is appealing that decision. Our case is stayed until the
DirecTV action is resolved.
We intend to vigorously prosecute this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that
we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to modify our system architecture. We cannot
predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
58
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Global Communications
During April 2007, Global Communications, Inc. (Global) filed a patent infringement action
against us and EchoStar in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The
suit alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 6,947,702 (the 702 patent), which relates to
satellite reception. In October 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted our
request for reexamination of the 702 patent and issued an initial Office Action finding that all
of the claims of the 702 patent were invalid. At the request of the parties, the District Court
stayed the litigation until the reexamination proceeding is concluded and/or other Global patent
applications issue.
During June 2009, Global filed a patent infringement action against us and EchoStar in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The suit alleges infringement of
United States Patent No. 7,542,717 (the 717 patent), which relates to satellite reception.
We intend to vigorously defend these cases. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that
we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may
include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Guardian Media
During December 2008, Guardian Media Technologies LTD (Guardian) filed suit against us, EchoStar,
EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., DirecTV and several other defendants in the United States District
Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos.
4,930,158 and 4,930,160. Both patents are expired and relate to certain parental lock features.
On September 9, 2009, Guardian voluntarily dismissed the case against us with prejudice.
Katz Communications
During June 2007, Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. (Katz) filed a patent infringement
action against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
suit alleges infringement of 19 patents owned by Katz. The patents relate to interactive voice
response, or IVR, technology.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Multimedia Patent Trust
On February 13, 2009, Multimedia Patent Trust (MPT) filed suit against us, EchoStar, DirecTV and
several other defendants in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,958,226, 5,227,878, 5,136,377,
5,500,678 and 5,563,593, which relate to video encoding, decoding and compression technology. MPT
is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of
the claims recited therein.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that
we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may
include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree
of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or
damages.
59
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
NorthPoint Technology
On July 2, 2009, NorthPoint Technology, Ltd (Northpoint) filed suit against us, EchoStar, and
DirecTV in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging infringement
of United States Patent No. 6,208,636 (the 636 patent). The 636 patent relates to the use of
multiple low-noise block converter feedhorns, or LNBFs, which are antennas used for satellite
reception.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we
currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the
suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Personalized Media Communications
In February 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. filed suit against us, EchoStar and
Motorola, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging
infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,694,490, 5,109,414, 4,965,825, 5,233,654, 5,335,277,
and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Retailer Class Actions
During 2000, lawsuits were filed by retailers in Colorado state and federal courts attempting to
certify nationwide classes on behalf of certain of our retailers. The plaintiffs are requesting
the Courts declare certain provisions of, and changes to, alleged agreements between us and the
retailers invalid and unenforceable, and to award damages for lost incentives and payments, charge
backs, and other compensation. We have asserted a variety of counterclaims. The federal court
action has been stayed during the pendency of the state court action. We filed a motion for
summary judgment on all counts and against all plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a motion for
additional time to conduct discovery to enable them to respond to our motion. The state court
granted limited discovery which ended during 2004. The plaintiffs claimed we did not provide
adequate disclosure during the discovery process. The state court agreed, and denied our motion
for summary judgment as a result. In April 2008, the state court granted plaintiffs class
certification motion and in January 2009, the state court entered an order excluding certain
evidence that we can present at trial based on the prior discovery issues. The state court also
denied plaintiffs request to dismiss our counterclaims. The final impact of the courts
evidentiary ruling cannot be fully assessed at this time. In May 2009, plaintiffs filed a motion
for default judgment based on new allegations of discovery misconduct. We intend to vigorously
defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the lawsuit or
determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Technology Development Licensing
On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing LLC (TechDev) filed suit against us and
EchoStar in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging
infringement of United States Patent No. 35, 952, which relates to certain favorite channel
features. In July 2009, the Court granted our motion to stay the case pending two re-examination
petitions before the Patent and Trademark Office.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly
features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the
outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
60
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Tivo Inc.
During January 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part
and reversed in part the April 2006 jury verdict concluding that certain of our digital video
recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by Tivo. As of September 2008, we had recorded a total
reserve of $132 million on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets to reflect the April 2006 jury
verdict, supplemental damages through September 2006 and pre-judgment interest awarded by the Texas
court, together with the estimated cost of potential further software infringement prior to
implementation of our alternative technology, discussed below, plus interest subsequent to entry of
the judgment. In its January 2008 decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the jurys verdict of
infringement on Tivos software claims, and upheld the award of damages from the District Court.
The Federal Circuit, however, found that we did not literally infringe Tivos hardware claims,
and remanded such claims back to the District Court for further proceedings. On October 6, 2008,
the Supreme Court denied our petition for certiorari. As a result, approximately $105 million of
the total $132 million reserve was released from an escrow account to Tivo.
We also developed and deployed next-generation DVR software. This improved software was
automatically downloaded to our current customers DVRs, and is fully operational (our original
alternative technology). The download was completed as of April 2007. We received written legal
opinions from outside counsel that concluded our original alternative technology does not infringe,
literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, either the hardware or software claims of Tivos
patent. Tivo filed a motion for contempt alleging that we are in violation of the Courts
injunction. We opposed this motion on the grounds that the injunction did not apply to DVRs that
have received our original alternative technology, that our original alternative technology does
not infringe Tivos patent, and that we were in compliance with the injunction.
On June 2, 2009, the District Court granted Tivos contempt motion, finding that our original
alternative technology was not more than colorably different than the products found by the jury to
infringe Tivos patent, that the original alternative technology still infringed the software
claims, and that even if the original alternative technology was non-infringing, the original
injunction by its terms required that we disable DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000
digital set-top boxes in the field. The District Court awarded Tivo $103 million in supplemental
damages and interest for the period from September 2006 to April 2008, based on an assumed $1.25
per subscriber per month royalty rate. We posted a bond to secure that award pending appeal of the
contempt order.
On July 1, 2009, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals granted a permanent stay of the District
Courts contempt order pending resolution of our appeal. In so doing, the Federal Circuit found,
at a minimum, that we had a substantial case on the merits. Oral argument on our appeal of the
contempt ruling took place on November 2, 2009 before three judges of the Federal Circuit.
The District Court held a hearing on July 28, 2009 on Tivos claims for contempt sanctions, but has
ordered that enforcement of any sanctions award will be stayed pending our appeal of the contempt
order. Tivo sought up to $975 million in contempt sanctions for the period from April 2008 to June
2009 based on, among other things, profits Tivo alleges we made from subscribers using DVRs. We
opposed Tivos request arguing, among other things, that sanctions are inappropriate because we
made good faith efforts to comply with the Courts injunction. We also challenged Tivos
calculation of profits.
On August 3, 2009, the Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO) issued an initial office action
rejecting the software claims of United States Patent No. 6,233,389 (the 389 patent) as being
invalid in light of two prior patents. These are the same software claims that we were found to
have infringed and which underlie the contempt ruling now pending on appeal. We believe that the
PTOs conclusions are relevant to the issues on appeal as well as the pending sanctions proceedings
in the District Court. The PTOs conclusions support our position that our original alternative
technology is more than colorably different than the devices found to infringe by the jury; that
our original alternative technology does not infringe; and that we acted in good faith to design
around Tivos patent.
On September 4, 2009, the District Court partially granted Tivos motion for contempt sanctions.
In partially granting Tivos motion for contempt sanctions, the District Court awarded $2.25 per
DVR subscriber per month for the period from April 2008 to July 2009 (as compared to the award for
supplemental damages for the prior period
61
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
from September 2006 to April 2008, which was based on an assumed $1.25 per DVR subscriber per
month). By the District Courts estimation, the total award for the period from April 2008 to July
2009 is approximately $200 million (the enforcement of the award has been stayed by the District
Court pending DISH Networks appeal of the underlying June 2, 2009 contempt order). During the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we increased our total reserve by $132 million and
$328 million, respectively, to reflect the supplemental damages and interest
for the period from implementation of our original alternative technology through April 2008 and
for the estimated cost of alleged software infringement (including contempt sanctions for the period from April 2008 through June 2009) for the period from April 2008 through
September 2009 plus interest. Our total reserve at September 30, 2009 was $360 million and is
included in Other accrued expenses on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In light of the District Courts finding of contempt, and its description of the manner in which it
believes our original alternative technology infringed the 389 patent, we are also developing and
testing potential new alternative technology in an engineering environment. As part of EchoStars
development process, EchoStar downloaded one of its design-around options to approximately 125
subscribers for beta testing.
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, we
are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are
unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be required to
eliminate DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000 digital set-top boxes in the field and
cease distribution of digital set-top boxes with DVR functionality. In that event we would be at a
significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality, which
would likely result in a significant decrease in new subscriber additions as well as a substantial
loss of current subscribers. Furthermore, the inability to offer DVR functionality could cause
certain of our distribution channels to terminate or significantly decrease their marketing of DISH
Network services. The adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations if the
District Courts contempt order is upheld is likely to be significant. Additionally,
the supplemental damage award of $103 million and further
award of approximately $200 million does not
include damages, contempt sanctions or interest for the period after June 2009. In the event that we are
unsuccessful in our appeal, we could also have to pay substantial additional damages, contempt
sanctions and interest. Depending on the amount of any additional damage or sanction award or any
monetary settlement, we may be required to raise additional capital at a time and in circumstances
in which we would normally not raise capital. Therefore, any capital we raise may be on terms that
are unfavorable to us, which might adversely affect our financial position and results of
operations and might also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms in the future to
fund our own operations and initiatives. We believe the cost of such capital and its terms and
conditions may be substantially less attractive than our previous financings.
If we are successful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, but
unsuccessful in defending against any subsequent claim in a new action that our original
alternative technology or any potential new alternative technology infringes Tivos patent, we
could be prohibited from distributing DVRs or could be required to modify or eliminate our
then-current DVR functionality in some or all set-top boxes in the field. In that event we would
be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality
and the adverse effect on our business could be material. We could also have to pay substantial
additional damages.
Because both we and EchoStar are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and EchoStar are jointly and
severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. We
have determined that we are obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the
Spin-off to indemnify EchoStar for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. EchoStar
has agreed to contribute an amount equal to its $5 million intellectual property liability limit
under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar have further agreed that EchoStars $5 million
contribution would not exhaust EchoStars liability to us for other intellectual property claims
that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar also agreed that we would each be
entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in
connection with any potential new alternative technology.
62
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Voom
On May 28, 2008, Voom HD Holdings (Voom) filed a complaint against us in New York Supreme Court.
The suit alleges breach of contract arising from our termination of the affiliation agreement we
had with Voom for the carriage of certain Voom HD channels on the DISH Network satellite television
service. In January 2008, Voom sought a preliminary injunction to prevent us from terminating the
agreement. The Court denied Vooms motion, finding, among other things, that Voom was not likely
to prevail on the merits of its case. Voom is claiming over $1.0 billion in damages. We intend to
vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the
suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims
which arise in the ordinary course of business, including among other things, disputes with
programmers regarding fees. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any
of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position, results of operations
or liquidity.
63
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors. The information presented below updates, and
should be read in conjunction with, the risk factors and information disclosed in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for 2008.
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, we
are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are
unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be subject to
substantial liability and would be prohibited from offering DVR functionality that would result in
a significant loss of subscribers and place us at a significant disadvantage to our competitors.
In June 2009, the United States District Court granted Tivos motion for contempt finding that our
next-generation DVRs continue to infringe Tivos intellectual property and awarded Tivo an
additional $103 million dollars in supplemental damages and interest for the period from September
2006 through April 2008. In September 2009, the District Court partially granted Tivos motion for
contempt sanctions. In partially granting Tivos motion for contempt sanctions, the District Court
awarded $2.25 per DVR subscriber per month for the period from April 2008 to July 2009 (as compared
to the award for supplemental damages for the prior period from September 2006 to April 2008, which
was based on an assumed $1.25 per DVR subscriber per month). By the District Courts estimation,
the total award for the period from April 2008 to July 2009 is approximately $200 million (the
enforcement of the award has been stayed by the District Court pending DISH Networks appeal of the
underlying June 2009 contempt order). As previously disclosed, we increased our reserve for the
Tivo litigation to reflect both the supplemental damages award for the period September 2006 to
April 2008 and for the estimated cost of alleged software infringement for the period from April
2008 through June 2009.
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, we
are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are
unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be required to
eliminate DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000 digital set-top boxes in the field and
cease distribution of digital set-top boxes with DVR functionality. In that event we would be at a
significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality, which
would likely result in a significant decrease in new subscriber additions as well as a substantial
loss of current subscribers. Furthermore, the inability to offer DVR functionality could cause
certain of our distribution channels to terminate or significantly decrease their marketing of DISH
Network services. The adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations if the
District Courts contempt order is upheld is likely to be significant. Additionally,
the awards described above do not include damages, contempt sanctions
or interest for the period after June 2009. In the event that we are
unsuccessful in our appeal, we could also have to pay substantial additional damages, contempt
sanctions and interest. Depending on the amount of any additional damage or sanction award or any
monetary settlement, we may be required to raise additional capital at a time and in circumstances
in which we would normally not raise capital. Therefore, any capital we raise may be on terms that
are unfavorable to us, which might adversely affect our financial position and results of
operations and might also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms in the future to
fund our own operations and initiatives. We believe the cost of such capital and its terms and
conditions may be substantially less attractive than our previous financings.
If we are successful in overturning the District Courts ruling on Tivos motion for contempt, but
unsuccessful in defending against any subsequent claim in a new action that our original
alternative technology or any potential new alternative technology infringes Tivos patent, we
could be prohibited from distributing DVRs or could be required to modify or eliminate our
then-current DVR functionality in some or all set-top boxes in the field. In that event we would
be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality
and the adverse effect on our business could be material. We could also have to pay substantial
additional damages.
Because both we and EchoStar are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and EchoStar are jointly and
severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. We
have determined that we are obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the
Spin-off to indemnify EchoStar for substantially
64
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
all liability arising from this lawsuit. EchoStar has agreed to contribute an amount equal to its
$5 million intellectual property liability limit under the Receiver Agreement. We and EchoStar
have further agreed that EchoStars $5 million contribution would not exhaust EchoStars liability
to us for other intellectual property claims that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. We and
EchoStar also agreed that we would each be entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to
use, any intellectual property developed in connection with any potential new alternative
technology.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information regarding repurchases of our Class A common stock from
July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Approximate |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Dollar Value of Shares |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
that May Yet be |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Plans or Programs (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
July 1 July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
980,580 |
|
August 1 August 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
980,580 |
|
September 1 September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
980,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
980,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Our board of directors previously authorized stock repurchases of up to $1.0 billion of our
Class A common stock. In November 2008, our board of directors extended the plan and
authorized an increase in the maximum dollar value of shares that may be repurchased under the
plan, such that we were authorized to repurchase up to $1.0 billion of our outstanding shares
through and including December 31, 2009, subject to a limitation to purchase no more than 20%
of our outstanding common stock. On November 3, 2009, our board of directors extended the plan
and authorized an increase in the maximum dollar value of shares that may be repurchased under
the plan, such that we are currently authorized to repurchase up to $1.0 billion of our
outstanding shares through and including December 31, 2010. This authorization is not subject to a limitation to
purchase no more than 20% of our outstanding common stock. Purchases under our repurchase
program may be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or Rule
10b5-1 trading plans, subject to market conditions and other factors. We may elect not to
purchase the maximum amount of shares allowable under this program and we may also enter into
additional share repurchase programs authorized by our board of directors. |
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On November 4, 2009, Mr. Roger Lynch, became employed by both us and EchoStar as Executive Vice
President. Mr. Lynch will report to Mr. Ergen and will be responsible for the development and
implementation of advanced technologies that are of potential utility and importance to both us and
EchoStar. Mr. Lynchs compensation will consist of cash and equity compensation and will be borne
by both EchoStar and us.
Dividend
On November 6, 2009, our board of directors declared a dividend of $2.00 per share on
our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. The
dividend will be payable in cash on December
2, 2009 to shareholders of record on November 20, 2009.
65
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Item 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1*
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2009, among
DISH DBS Corporation, the guarantors named on the signature pages
thereto and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 4.2 to the current report on Form 8-K of DISH Network
filed on October 6, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
NIMIQ 5 Whole RF Channel Service Agreement, dated September 15, 2009,
between Telesat Canada and EchoStar (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
NIMIQ 5 Whole RF Channel Service
Agreement, dated September 15, 2009,
between EchoStar and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Commission File No.
001-33807).*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Professional Services Agreement, dated August 4, 2009, between EchoStar and DISH Network
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of EchoStar for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
Commission File No. 001-33807).*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Allocation Agreement, dated August 4, 2009, between EchoStar and DISH Network (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of EchoStar for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Commission
File No. 001-33807). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1o
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2o
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1o
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2o
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101**
|
|
The following materials from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
DISH Network for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, filed on
November 9, 2009, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting
Language (XBRL): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income (Loss), (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial statements tagged
as blocks of text. |
|
|
|
o |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference. |
|
** |
|
In accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the information in this Exhibit 101 shall not
be deemed filed for the purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set
forth by the specific reference in such filing. |
|
*** |
|
Certain portions of the exhibit have been omitted and separately filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission with a request for confidential treatment. |
66
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Charles W. Ergen
|
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen |
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Robert E. Olson
|
|
|
|
Robert E. Olson |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
Date: November 9, 2009
67