e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-21969
Ciena Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
23-2725311
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1201 Winterson Road, Linthicum, MD
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
21090
(Zip Code) |
(410) 865-8500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES
þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions
of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
(do not check if smaller reporting company) |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as determined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at August 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
common stock, $.01 par value
|
|
93,571,893 |
CIENA CORPORATION
INDEX
FORM 10-Q
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
139,903 |
|
|
$ |
312,378 |
|
|
$ |
398,469 |
|
|
$ |
667,852 |
|
Services |
|
|
24,855 |
|
|
|
77,297 |
|
|
|
77,890 |
|
|
|
151,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
164,758 |
|
|
|
389,675 |
|
|
|
476,359 |
|
|
|
819,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
72,842 |
|
|
|
201,559 |
|
|
|
214,628 |
|
|
|
396,449 |
|
Services |
|
|
17,251 |
|
|
|
44,107 |
|
|
|
54,503 |
|
|
|
93,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
90,093 |
|
|
|
245,666 |
|
|
|
269,131 |
|
|
|
489,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
74,665 |
|
|
|
144,009 |
|
|
|
207,228 |
|
|
|
329,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
44,442 |
|
|
|
100,869 |
|
|
|
140,624 |
|
|
|
222,044 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
31,468 |
|
|
|
52,127 |
|
|
|
98,582 |
|
|
|
131,692 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11,524 |
|
|
|
32,649 |
|
|
|
35,724 |
|
|
|
66,915 |
|
Acquisition and integration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,285 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
6,224 |
|
|
|
38,727 |
|
|
|
18,852 |
|
|
|
61,829 |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
3,941 |
|
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
10,416 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
97,599 |
|
|
|
243,562 |
|
|
|
759,871 |
|
|
|
569,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(22,934 |
) |
|
|
(99,553 |
) |
|
|
(552,643 |
) |
|
|
(240,639 |
) |
Interest and other income (loss), net |
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
(2,668 |
) |
|
|
9,167 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,856 |
) |
|
|
(5,990 |
) |
|
|
(5,552 |
) |
|
|
(11,931 |
) |
Loss on cost method investments |
|
|
(2,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(25,984 |
) |
|
|
(108,211 |
) |
|
|
(554,356 |
) |
|
|
(252,263 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(26,454 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,855 |
) |
|
$ |
(554,495 |
) |
|
$ |
(253,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net loss per potential common share |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding |
|
|
91,364 |
|
|
|
92,906 |
|
|
|
90,970 |
|
|
|
92,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average dilutive potential common shares outstanding |
|
|
91,364 |
|
|
|
92,906 |
|
|
|
90,970 |
|
|
|
92,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
485,705 |
|
|
$ |
470,237 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
563,183 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
118,251 |
|
|
|
260,277 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
88,086 |
|
|
|
222,164 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
50,537 |
|
|
|
118,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,305,762 |
|
|
|
1,071,433 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
8,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net |
|
|
61,868 |
|
|
|
118,755 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,086 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
60,820 |
|
|
|
470,610 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
67,902 |
|
|
|
112,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,504,383 |
|
|
$ |
1,811,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
53,104 |
|
|
$ |
118,972 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
103,349 |
|
|
|
178,427 |
|
Restructuring liabilities |
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
40,565 |
|
|
|
58,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
198,829 |
|
|
|
360,381 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
|
35,368 |
|
|
|
32,122 |
|
Long-term restructuring liabilities |
|
|
7,794 |
|
|
|
5,995 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
8,554 |
|
|
|
10,098 |
|
Convertible notes payable |
|
|
798,000 |
|
|
|
1,174,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,048,545 |
|
|
|
1,583,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock par value $0.01;
20,000,000 shares authorized; zero shares
issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
par value $0.01; 290,000,000
shares authorized; 92,038,360 and 93,567,775
shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
5,665,028 |
|
|
|
5,692,387 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(5,211,333 |
) |
|
|
(5,464,530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
455,838 |
|
|
|
228,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,504,383 |
|
|
$ |
1,811,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(554,495 |
) |
|
$ |
(253,197 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of (discount) premium on marketable securities |
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
574 |
|
Loss on cost method investments |
|
|
5,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on embedded redemption feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,570 |
) |
Depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures, and
amortization of leasehold improvements |
|
|
16,270 |
|
|
|
28,146 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation costs |
|
|
26,075 |
|
|
|
26,451 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
23,804 |
|
|
|
82,476 |
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence |
|
|
11,126 |
|
|
|
10,749 |
|
Provision for warranty |
|
|
13,620 |
|
|
|
16,388 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
18,128 |
|
|
|
(134,844 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(7,274 |
) |
|
|
(30,765 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
(1,696 |
) |
|
|
(29,528 |
) |
Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations |
|
|
(5,799 |
) |
|
|
83,580 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
(3,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
|
(203,236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for equipment, furniture, fixtures and intellectual property |
|
|
(17,630 |
) |
|
|
(34,646 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
(18,845 |
) |
Purchase of available for sale securities |
|
|
(926,621 |
) |
|
|
(63,591 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of available for sale securities |
|
|
321,554 |
|
|
|
454,141 |
|
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities |
|
|
523,137 |
|
|
|
179,380 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(693,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(101,474 |
) |
|
|
(176,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 4.0% convertible notes payable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
364,316 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
365,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
(664 |
) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(95,437 |
) |
|
|
(14,804 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
550,669 |
|
|
|
485,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
455,732 |
|
|
$ |
470,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
4,748 |
|
|
$ |
4,748 |
|
Income taxes, net |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
2,037 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment in accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
|
$ |
4,421 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CIENA CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The interim financial statements included herein for Ciena Corporation (Ciena) have been
prepared by Ciena, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, financial statements included in this report
reflect all normal recurring adjustments that Ciena considers necessary for the fair statement of
the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of the financial position of Ciena at
the date of the interim balance sheets. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The
October 31, 2009 condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial
statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. However, Ciena believes that the disclosures are
adequate to understand the information presented. The operating results for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire year. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with Cienas audited consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in Cienas annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009.
On March 19, 2010, Ciena completed its acquisition of substantially all of the optical
networking and Carrier Ethernet assets of Nortels Metro Ethernet Networks (MEN Business).
Cienas results of operations for the third quarter include the results of the MEN Business for the
entire period and the results of operations for the nine month period ended July 31, 2010 reflect
the operations of the MEN Business beginning on the March 19, 2010 acquisition date. See Note 3
below.
Ciena has a 52 or 53 week fiscal year, which ends on the Saturday nearest to the last day of
October of each year. For purposes of financial statement presentation, each fiscal year is
described as having ended on October 31, and each fiscal quarter is described as having ended on
January 31, April 30 and July 31 of each fiscal year.
(2) SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Estimates are used for bad debts, valuation of inventories and investments,
recoverability of intangible assets, other long-lived assets and goodwill, income taxes, warranty
obligations, restructuring liabilities, derivatives and contingencies and litigation. Ciena bases
its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that it believes are reasonable. Actual
results may differ materially from managements estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Ciena considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash collateralizing letters of credits are
included in other current assets and other long-term assets depending upon the duration of the
restriction.
Investments
Cienas investments are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with
unrealized gains and losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. Ciena recognizes
losses when it determines that declines in the fair value of its investments, below their cost
basis, are other-than-temporary. In determining whether a decline in fair value is
other-than-temporary, Ciena considers various factors including market price (when available),
investment ratings, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, the length of
time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than Cienas cost basis, and its intent
and ability to hold the investment until maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for
any anticipated recovery in market value. Ciena considers all marketable debt securities that it
expects to convert to cash within one year or less to be short-term investments. All others are
considered long-term investments.
Ciena has certain minority equity investments in privately held technology companies that are
classified as other assets. These investments are carried at cost because Ciena owns less than 20%
of the voting equity and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over these
companies. These investments involve a high degree of risk as the markets for the technologies or
products manufactured by these companies are usually early stage at the time of Cienas investment
and such markets may never be significant. Ciena could lose its entire investment in some or all of
these companies. Ciena monitors these investments for impairment and makes appropriate reductions
in carrying values when necessary.
6
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost computed using standard cost,
which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis. Ciena records a provision for
excess and obsolete inventory when an impairment has been identified.
Segment Reporting
Effective upon the March 19, 2010 completion of the acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena
reorganized its internal organizational structure and the management of its business. Cienas chief
operating decision maker, its chief executive officer, evaluates performance and allocates
resources based on multiple factors, including segment profit (loss) information for the following
product categories: (i) Packet-Optical Transport; (ii) Packet-Optical Switching; (iii) Carrier
Ethernet Service Delivery; and (iv) Software and Services. Operating segments are defined as
components of an enterprise: that engage in business activities which may earn revenue and incur
expense; for which discrete financial information is available; and for which such information is
evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources and
assessing performance. Ciena considers the four product categories above to be its operating
segments for reporting purposes. See Notes 3 and 20.
Goodwill
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair values assigned to the net assets
acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting units that are expected
to benefit from the synergies of the combination. Ciena has determined that its operating segments
and reporting units for goodwill assignment are the same. This determination is based on the fact
that components below Cienas operating segment level, such as individual product or service
offerings, do not constitute a reporting unit because they do not constitute a business for which
discrete financial information is available.
Ciena tests each reporting units goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which Ciena has
determined to be the last business day of its fiscal September each year. Testing is required
between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not,
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Prior to the reorganization
of Cienas operations described above, Ciena tested its goodwill for impairment as a single
reporting unit.
Long-lived Assets
Cienas long-lived assets include: equipment, furniture and fixtures; intangible assets; and
maintenance spares. Ciena tests long-lived assets for impairment whenever triggering events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the assets carrying amount is not recoverable from its
undiscounted cash flows. An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount
of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value. Cienas long-lived assets are assigned to
reporting units which represent the lowest level for which cash flows can be identified.
Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures
Equipment, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are
computed using the straight-line method over useful lives of two years to five years for equipment,
furniture and fixtures and the shorter of useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements.
Qualifying internal use software and website development costs incurred during the application
development stage that consist primarily of outside services and purchased software license costs,
are capitalized and amortized straight-line over the estimated useful life.
Intangible Assets
Ciena has recorded finite-lived and indefinite lived intangible assets as a result of several
acquisitions. Finite-lived intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization.
Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the expected economic lives of the
respective assets, from nine months to seven years, which approximates the use of intangible
assets.
7
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are carried at cost and reflect in-process research and
development assets acquired from the MEN Business. In-process research and development assets will
be impaired, if abandoned, or amortized in future periods, depending upon the ability of Ciena to
use the research and development in future periods. Future expenditures to complete the in-process
research and development projects will be expensed as incurred.
Maintenance Spares
Maintenance spares are recorded at cost. Spares usage cost is computed using the straight-line
method over useful lives of four years.
Concentrations
Substantially all of Cienas cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term
investments in marketable debt securities are maintained at two major U.S. financial institutions.
The majority of Cienas cash equivalents consist of money market funds. Deposits held with banks
may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be
redeemed upon demand and, therefore, management believes that they bear minimal risk.
Historically, a large percentage of Cienas revenue has been the result of sales to a small
number of communications service providers. Consolidation among Cienas customers has increased
this concentration. Consequently, Cienas accounts receivable are concentrated among these
customers. See Notes 9 and 20 below.
Additionally, Cienas access to certain materials or components is dependent upon sole or
limited source suppliers. The inability of any supplier to fulfill Cienas supply requirements
could affect future results. Ciena relies on a small number of contract manufacturers to perform
the majority of the manufacturing for its products. If Ciena cannot effectively manage these
manufacturers and forecast future demand, or if they fail to deliver products or components on
time, Cienas business and results of operations may suffer.
Revenue Recognition
Ciena recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price to the buyer is
fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Customer purchase agreements and
customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping
documents and evidence of customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. Ciena
assesses whether the price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the
transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. Ciena assesses
collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit
checks and analysis, as well as the customers payment history. Revenue for maintenance services is
generally deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be
performed.
Ciena applies the percentage of completion method to long-term arrangements where it is
required to undertake significant production, customizations or modification engineering, and
reasonable and reliable estimates of revenue and cost are available. Utilizing the percentage of
completion method, Ciena recognizes revenue based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to date to
total estimated costs expected to be incurred. In instances that do not meet the percentage of
completion method criteria, recognition of revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties
regarding customer acceptance.
Some of Cienas communications networking equipment is integrated with software that is
essential to the functionality of the equipment. Software revenue is recognized when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and
collectibility is probable. In instances where final acceptance of the product is specified by the
customer, revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
Arrangements with customers may include multiple deliverables, including any combination of
equipment, services and software. If multiple element arrangements include software or
software-related elements that are essential to the equipment, Ciena allocates the arrangement fee
to be allocated to those separate units of accounting. Multiple element arrangements that include
software are separated into more than one unit of accounting if the functionality of the delivered
element(s) is not dependent on the undelivered element(s), there is vendor-specific objective
evidence of the fair value of the undelivered element(s), and general revenue recognition criteria
related to the delivered element(s) have been met. The amount of product and services revenue
recognized is affected by Cienas judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements
and, if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists. Changes to the
elements in an arrangement and Cienas ability to establish vendor-specific objective evidence for
those elements could affect the timing of revenue
8
recognition. For all other deliverables, Ciena
separates the elements into more than one unit of accounting if the delivered element(s) have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, objective and reliable
evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered element(s), and delivery of the undelivered
element(s) is probable and substantially in Cienas control. Revenue is allocated to each unit of
accounting based on the relative fair value of each accounting unit or using the residual method if
objective evidence of fair value does not exist for the delivered element(s). The revenue
recognition criteria described above are applied to each separate unit of accounting. If these
criteria are not met, revenue is deferred until the criteria are met or the last element has been
delivered.
Warranty Accruals
Ciena provides for the estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty obligations upon the
recognition of the related revenue. Estimated warranty costs include estimates for material costs,
technical support labor costs and associated overhead. The warranty liability is included in cost
of goods sold and determined based upon actual warranty cost experience, estimates of component
failure rates and managements industry experience. Cienas sales contracts do not permit the right
of return of product by the customer after the product has been accepted.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Ciena recorded an adjustment to reduce its warranty
liability and cost of goods sold by $3.3 million, to correct an overstatement of warranty expenses
related to prior periods. The adjustment related to an error in the methodology of computing the
annual failure rate used to calculate the warranty accrual. There was no tax impact as a result of
this adjustment. Ciena believes this adjustment is not material to its financial statements for
prior annual or interim periods, the first nine months of fiscal 2010 or the expected annual
results for fiscal 2010.
Accounts Receivable, Net
Cienas allowance for doubtful accounts is based on its assessment, on a specific
identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. Ciena performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers and generally has not required collateral or other forms of security
from its customers. In determining the appropriate balance for Cienas allowance for doubtful
accounts, management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to determine
collectibility. In doing so, management considers creditworthiness, payment history, account
activity and communication with such customer. If a customers financial condition changes, Ciena
may be required to record an allowance for doubtful accounts, which would negatively affect its
results of operations.
Research and Development
Ciena charges all research and development costs to expense as incurred. Types of expense
incurred in research and development include employee compensation, prototype, consulting,
depreciation, facility costs and information technologies.
Advertising Costs
Ciena expenses all advertising costs as incurred.
Legal Costs
Ciena expenses legal costs associated with litigation defense as incurred.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
Ciena measures and recognizes compensation expense for share-based awards based on estimated
fair values on the date of grant. Ciena estimates the fair value of each option-based award on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model is affected by Cienas stock
price as well as estimates regarding a number of variables including expected stock price
volatility over the expected term of the award and projected employee stock option exercise
behaviors. Ciena estimates the fair value of each share-based award based on the fair value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant. In each case, Ciena only recognizes expense to its
consolidated statement of operations for those options or shares that are expected ultimately to
vest. Ciena uses two attribution methods to record expense, the straight-line method for grants
with service-based vesting and the graded-vesting method, which considers each performance period
or tranche separately, for all other awards. See Note 18 below.
9
Income Taxes
Ciena accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach that recognizes deferred
tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their respective tax bases,
and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. In estimating future tax consequences, Ciena
considers all expected future events other than the enactment of changes in tax laws or rates.
Valuation allowances are provided, if, based upon the weight of the available evidence, it is more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Ciena adopted the accounting guidance on uncertainty related to income tax positions at the
beginning of fiscal 2008. Ciena classifies interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions as a component of income tax expense. All of the uncertain tax positions, if recognized,
would decrease the effective income tax rate.
In the ordinary course of business, transactions occur for which the ultimate outcome may
be uncertain. In addition, tax authorities periodically audit Cienas income tax returns. These
audits examine significant tax filing positions, including the timing and amounts of deductions and
the allocation of income tax expenses among tax jurisdictions.
Cienas major tax jurisdictions and the related open tax years are as follows:
United States (2007), United Kingdom (2004), Canada (2005) and India (2007). However, limited adjustments can be made to
Federal tax returns in earlier years in order to reduce net operating loss carryforwards.
Ciena has not provided U.S. deferred income taxes on the cumulative unremitted earnings
of its non-U.S. affiliates as it plans to permanently reinvest cumulative unremitted foreign
earnings outside the U.S. and it is not practicable to determine the unrecognized deferred income
taxes. These cumulative unremitted foreign earnings relate to ongoing operations in foreign
jurisdictions and are required to fund foreign operations, capital expenditures, and any expansion
requirements.
Ciena recognizes windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options or
release of restricted stock units directly to stockholders equity only when realized. A windfall
tax benefit occurs when the actual tax benefit realized by Ciena upon an employees disposition of
a share-based award exceeds the deferred tax asset, if any, associated with the award that Ciena
had recorded. When assessing whether a tax benefit relating to share-based compensation has been
realized, Ciena follows the tax law with-and-without method. Under the with-and-without method,
the windfall is considered realized and recognized for financial statement purposes only when an
incremental benefit is provided after considering all other tax benefits including Cienas net
operating losses. The with-and-without method results in the windfall from share-based compensation
awards always being effectively the last tax benefit to be considered. Consequently, the windfall
attributable to share-based compensation will not be considered realized in instances where Cienas
net operating loss carryover (that is unrelated to windfalls) is sufficient to offset the current
years taxable income before considering the effects of current-year windfalls.
Loss Contingencies
Ciena is subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of
business. These may relate to disputes, litigation and other legal actions. Ciena considers the
likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as Cienas ability to reasonably
estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is
accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be
reasonably estimated. Ciena regularly evaluates current information available to it to determine
whether any accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of Cienas cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, and accrued liabilities, approximates fair market value due to the relatively short period
of time to maturity. The fair value of investments in marketable debt securities is determined
using quoted market prices for those securities or similar financial instruments. For information
related to the fair value of Cienas convertible notes, see Note 8 below.
Fair value for the measurement of financial assets and liabilities is defined as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based
measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing an asset or liability. Ciena utilizes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs
for fair value measurement. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as
follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities; |
10
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in less
active markets or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for
substantially the full term of the financial instrument; |
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on Cienas assumptions used to measure
assets and liabilities at fair value. |
By distinguishing between inputs that are observable in the marketplace, and therefore more
objective, and those that are unobservable and therefore more subjective, the hierarchy is designed
to indicate the relative reliability of the fair value measurements. A financial asset or
liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that
is significant to the fair value measurement.
Restructuring
From time to time, Ciena takes actions to align its workforce, facilities and operating costs
with perceived market opportunities and business conditions. Ciena implements these restructuring
plans and incurs the associated liability concurrently. Generally accepted accounting principles
require that a liability for the cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized in
the period in which the liability is incurred, except for one-time employee termination benefits
related to a service period of more than 60 days, which are accrued over the service period. See
Note 6 below.
Foreign Currency
Some of Cienas foreign branch offices and subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their
functional currency, because Ciena, as the U.S. parent entity, exclusively funds the operations of
these branch offices and subsidiaries. For those subsidiaries using the local
currency as their functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in
effect at the balance sheet date, and the statement of operations is translated at a monthly
average rate. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded directly to a separate component of
stockholders equity. Where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency of foreign branch offices or
subsidiaries, re-measurement adjustments are recorded in other income. The net gain (loss) on
foreign currency re-measurement and exchange rate changes is immaterial for separate financial
statement presentation.
Derivatives
Cienas 4.0% convertible senior notes include a redemption feature that is accounted for as a
separate embedded derivative. The embedded redemption feature is recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis and these changes are included in interest and other income (expense), net on the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Occasionally, Ciena uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain forecasted
foreign currency transactions relating to operating expenses. Historically these derivatives,
designated as cash flow hedges, had maturities of less than one year and permitted net settlement.
At the inception of the cash flow hedge and on an ongoing basis, Ciena assesses the hedging
relationship to determine its effectiveness in offsetting changes in cash flows attributable to the
hedged risk during the hedge period. The effective portion of the hedging instruments net gain or
loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and
upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified into the operating
expense line item to which the hedged transaction relates. Any net gain or loss associated with the
ineffectiveness of the hedging instrument is reported in interest and other income, net. See Note
15 below.
Computation of Basic Net Income (Loss) per Common Share and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Dilutive
Potential Common Share
Ciena calculates basic earnings per share (EPS) by dividing earnings attributable to common
stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS
includes other potential dilutive common stock that would occur if securities or other contracts to
issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Ciena uses a dual presentation of
basic and diluted EPS on the face of its income statement. A reconciliation of the numerator and
denominator used for the basic and diluted EPS computations is set forth in Note 17.
11
Software Development Costs
Generally accepted accounting principles require the capitalization of certain software
development costs incurred subsequent to the date technological feasibility is established and
prior to the date the product is generally available for sale. The capitalized cost is then
amortized straight-line over the estimated life of the product. Ciena defines technological
feasibility as being attained at the time a working model is completed. To date, the period between
Ciena achieving technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has been
short, and software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been insignificant.
Accordingly, Ciena has not capitalized any software development costs.
Newly Issued Accounting Standards
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (FASB) amended the accounting
standards for revenue recognition with multiple deliverables. The amended guidance allows the use
of managements best estimate of selling price for individual elements of an arrangement when
vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence is unavailable. Additionally, it
eliminates the residual method of revenue recognition in accounting for multiple deliverable
arrangements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and
early adoption is permitted. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact this new guidance could have
on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In October 2009, the FASB amended the accounting standards for revenue arrangements with
software elements. The amended guidance modifies the scope of the software revenue recognition
guidance to exclude tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that
function together to deliver the products essential functionality. The pronouncement is effective
for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permitted. This guidance
must be adopted in the same period an entity adopts the amended revenue arrangements with multiple
deliverables guidance described above. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact this new guidance
could have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
(3) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Acquisition of MEN Business
On March 19, 2010, Ciena completed its acquisition of the MEN Business. Ciena believes that
this transaction strengthens its position as a leader in next-generation, converged optical
Ethernet networking and will accelerate the execution of its corporate and research and development
strategies. Ciena believes that the additional geographic reach, expanded customer relationships,
and broader portfolio of complementary network solutions derived from the acquisition will enable
Ciena to better compete with larger equipment vendors.
In accordance with the agreements for
the acquisition, the initial $773.8 million aggregate purchase
price, which was payable in cash and convertible notes, was subsequently adjusted downward by
$80.6 million based upon the amount
of net working capital transferred to Ciena at closing. Prior to closing, Ciena elected to replace
the $239.0 million in aggregate principal of convertible notes that were to be issued to Nortel as
part of the aggregate purchase price with cash equivalent to 102% of the face amount of the notes
replaced, or $243.8 million. Ciena completed a private placement of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes
due March 15, 2015 in aggregate principal amount of
$375.0 million which funded this election and reduced
the amount of cash on hand required to fund the aggregate purchase
price. See Note 16 below. As a result, the aggregate purchase price
was $693.2 million consisting entirely of cash.
Given the structure of the transaction as an asset carve-out from Nortel, Ciena expects that
the transaction will result in a costly and complex integration with a number of operational risks.
Ciena expects to incur approximately $180 million in costs associated with equipment and
information technology, transaction expense, severance expense and consulting and third party
service fees associated with the integration, with the majority of these costs to be incurred in
fiscal 2010. In addition to these costs, Ciena has incurred inventory obsolescence charges and may
incur additional expenses related to, among other things, facilities restructuring. As a result,
the expense that Ciena incurs and recognizes for financial statement purposes will be significantly
higher than the estimated costs above. As of July 31, 2010, Ciena has incurred $83.3 million in
transaction, consulting and third party service fees, $4.0 million in severance expense, and an
additional $10.8 million, primarily related to purchases of capitalized information technology
equipment. In addition to the estimated costs above, Ciena also expects to incur significant
transition services expense. Ciena is currently relying upon an affiliate of Nortel to perform
certain critical operational and business support functions during an interim integration period.
Ciena can utilize certain of these support services for a period of up to 24 months following the
acquisition of the MEN Business, 12 months in Europe, Middle East and Africa, (EMEA). The cost of
these transition services is estimated to be approximately $94 million annually. The actual expense
will depend upon the scope of the services that Ciena utilizes and the time within which Ciena is
able to complete the planned transfer of these services to internal resources or other third party
providers.
12
During fiscal 2010, Ciena adopted the new FASB guidance on business combinations. The
acquisition of the MEN Business has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting
which requires the total purchase price to be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values.
The fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on valuations
using managements best estimates and assumptions. The allocation of the purchase price as
reflected in these consolidated financial statements is based on the best information available to
management at the time these consolidated financial statements were issued and is preliminary
pending the completion of the valuation analysis of selected assets and liabilities. During the
measurement period (which is not to exceed one-year from the acquisition date), Ciena is required
to retrospectively adjust the provisional assets or liabilities if new information is obtained
about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have
resulted in the recognition of those assets or liabilities as of that date. The following table
summarizes the initial measurement allocation of the purchase price, measurement period adjustments
and the current measurement allocation related to the MEN Business based on the estimated fair
value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
|
|
Measurement |
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
Measurement |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Measurement |
|
|
|
Allocation |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Allocation |
|
Unbilled receivables |
|
$ |
7,454 |
|
|
$ |
(271 |
) |
|
$ |
7,183 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
114,169 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
114,062 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
32,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,517 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
21,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,821 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
|
45,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,351 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
218,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,774 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
Customer relationships,
outstanding purchase orders and
contracts |
|
|
257,964 |
|
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
260,247 |
|
Trade name |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
39,991 |
|
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
|
38,086 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(18,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,801 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(36,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,349 |
) |
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
(2,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocation |
|
$ |
693,247 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
693,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any additional changes in the estimated fair value of the net assets during the remaining
measurement period will change the amount of the purchase price allocable to goodwill and, if
material, Cienas consolidated financial results will be adjusted retroactively. Ciena is currently
not aware of any significant potential changes to the current purchase price allocation.
Unbilled receivables represent unbilled claims for which Ciena will invoice customers upon its
completion of the acquired projects.
Under the acquisition method of accounting, Ciena revalued the acquired finished goods
inventory to fair value, which was determined to be most appropriately recognized as the estimated
selling price less the sum of (a) costs of disposal, and (b) a reasonable profit allowance for
Cienas selling effort. This revaluation resulted in an increase in inventory carrying value of
approximately $39.7 million for marketable inventory offset by a decrease of $2.5 million for
unmarketable inventory.
Prepaid expenses and other include product demonstration units used to support research and
development projects and indemnification assets related to uncertain tax contingencies acquired and
recorded as part of other long-term obligations. Other long-term assets represent spares used to
support customer maintenance commitments.
Developed technology represents purchased technology which has reached technological
feasibility and for which development had been completed as of the date of the acquisition.
Developed technology will be amortized on a straight line basis over its estimated useful lives of
two to seven years.
In-process research and development represents development projects that had not reached
technological feasibility at the time of the acquisition. In-process research and development
assets will be impaired, if abandoned, or amortized in future periods, depending upon the ability
of Ciena to use the research and development in future periods. Future expenditures to complete the
in-process research and development projects will be expensed as incurred.
13
Customer relationships, outstanding purchase orders and contracts represent agreements with
existing customers of the MEN Business. These intangible assets are expected to have estimated
useful lives of nine months to seven years, with the exception of $14.2 million related to a
contract asset for acquired in-process projects which will be billed
in full by Ciena and recognized as a reduction in revenue within the next year. Trade name represents acquired
product trade names which are expected to have a useful life of nine months.
Goodwill represents the purchase price in excess of the amounts assigned to acquired tangible
or intangible assets and assumed liabilities. Amounts allocated to goodwill are tax deductible in
all relevant jurisdictions. The goodwill is attributable to the assigned workforce of the MEN
Business and the synergies expected to arise as a result of the acquisition.
Deferred revenue represents obligations assumed by Ciena to provide maintenance support
services for which payment for such services was already made to Nortel.
Accrued liabilities represent assumed warranty obligations, other customer contract
obligations, and certain employee benefit plans. Other long-term obligations represent uncertain
tax contingencies.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the results of operations
for the periods indicated as if Cienas acquisition of the MEN Business had been completed as of
the beginning of each of the periods presented. Revenue specific to the MEN Business since the
March 19, 2010 acquisition date was $275.3 million. As Ciena has begun to integrate the
combined operations, eliminating overlapping processes and expenses and integrating its products
and sales efforts with those of the acquired MEN Business, it is impractical to determine the
earnings specific to the MEN Business since the acquisition date.
These pro forma amounts (in thousands) do not purport to be indicative of the results that
would have actually been obtained if the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of the periods
presented or that may be obtained in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Pro forma revenue |
|
$ |
406,758 |
|
|
$ |
393,843 |
|
|
$ |
1,260,112 |
|
|
$ |
1,174,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(127,845 |
) |
|
$ |
(77,080 |
) |
|
$ |
(859,305 |
) |
|
$ |
(463,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) GOODWILL
Goodwill
As a result of its acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena recorded goodwill of $38.1 million.
This goodwill was assigned to the Packet-Optical Transport reporting unit as that unit is expected
to benefit from synergies of the combination.
The table below sets forth changes in the carrying amount of goodwill in each of our reporting
units for the period indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packet- |
|
Packet- |
|
Ethernet |
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
Optical |
|
Optical |
|
Service |
|
and |
|
|
|
|
Transport |
|
Switching |
|
Delivery |
|
Services |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
38,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,086 |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
38,086 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
38,086 |
|
|
|
|
The table below sets forth changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the period indicated
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
455,673 |
|
Impairment loss |
|
|
(455,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of Julyl 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Goodwill Impairment
Prior to the acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena assessed its goodwill based upon a single
reporting unit and tested its single reporting units goodwill for impairment annually on the last
business day of fiscal September each year. Testing is required between annual tests if events
occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not,
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Based on a combination of factors, including
macroeconomic conditions and a sustained decline in Cienas common stock price and market
capitalization below net book value, Ciena conducted an interim impairment assessment of goodwill
during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Ciena performed the step one fair value comparison, and
its market capitalization was $721.8 million and its carrying value, including goodwill, was $949.0
million. Ciena applied a 25% control premium to its market capitalization to determine a fair value
of $902.2 million. Because step one indicated that Cienas fair value was less than its carrying
value, Ciena performed the step two analysis. Under the step two analysis, the implied fair value
of goodwill requires valuation of a reporting units tangible and intangible assets and liabilities
in a manner similar to the allocation of purchase price in a business combination. If the carrying
value of a reporting units goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, goodwill is deemed impaired
and is written down to the extent of the difference. The implied fair value of the reporting
units goodwill was determined to be $0, and, as a result, Ciena recorded a goodwill impairment of
$455.7 million, representing the full carrying value of the goodwill.
(5) LONG-LIVED ASSET IMPAIRMENTS
Due to the reorganization described in Note 2 above, Ciena performed an impairment analysis of
its long-lived assets during the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Based on Cienas estimate of
future, undiscounted cash flows by asset group, no impairment was required.
(6) RESTRUCTURING COSTS
In April 2010, Ciena committed to certain restructuring actions and subsequently effected a
headcount reduction of approximately 70 employees, principally affecting Cienas Global Product
Group and Global Field Organization outside of the EMEA region. This action resulted in a
restructuring charge of $1.8 million in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 and $0.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
In May 2010, following the end of its fiscal second quarter, Ciena informed employees of its
proposal to reorganize and restructure portions of Cienas business and operations in the EMEA
region, which is expected to involve the elimination of 120 to 140 roles with
reductions expected to principally affect employees in Cienas Global Field Organization and Global
Supply Chain organization. Execution of any specific reorganization is
subject to local legal requirements, including notification and consultation processes with
employees and employee representatives. Ciena estimates completing the reorganization by the first
half of calendar year 2011. Ciena expects total restructuring costs related to this action to range from
$8.0 million to $10.0 million. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, Ciena recorded expenses of
$1.9 million related to the reduction in head count of
approximately 26 employees in the Global
Field Organization.
The following table sets forth the activity and balance of the restructuring liability
accounts for the nine months ended July 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
of excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reduction |
|
|
facilities |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at October 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
9,435 |
|
|
$ |
9,605 |
|
Additional liability recorded |
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(2,476 |
) |
|
|
(2,098 |
) |
|
|
(4,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,679 |
|
|
$ |
7,337 |
|
|
$ |
9,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
1,679 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
$ |
3,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The following table sets forth the activity and balance of the restructuring liability
accounts for the nine months ended July 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
of excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reduction |
|
|
facilities |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
$ |
3,243 |
|
|
$ |
4,225 |
|
Additional liability recorded |
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
6,318 |
|
|
|
10,416 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(4,822 |
) |
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
(5,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
9,229 |
|
|
$ |
9,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
1,659 |
|
|
$ |
1,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,570 |
|
|
$ |
7,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) MARKETABLE SECURITIES
As of the dates indicated, short-term and long-term investments are comprised of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Publicly traded equity securities |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in short-term investments |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
Included in long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
$ |
570,505 |
|
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
570,963 |
|
Publicly traded equity securities |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
570,756 |
|
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
571,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in short-term investments |
|
|
562,781 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
563,183 |
|
Included in long-term investments |
|
|
7,975 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
570,756 |
|
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
571,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses related to marketable debt investments, included in short-term and
long-term investments, were primarily due to changes in interest rates. Cienas management
determined that the gross unrealized losses at October 31, 2009 were temporary in nature because
Ciena had the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which
may be maturity. There were no gross unrealized losses at July 31, 2010. As of October 31, 2009,
gross unrealized losses were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses Less |
|
|
Unrealized Losses 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than 12 Months |
|
|
Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
37,744 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
37,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
37,744 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
37,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
As of the date indicated, the following table summarizes the fair value of assets that are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded redemption feature |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,280 |
|
|
$ |
4,280 |
|
Publicly traded equity securities |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,280 |
|
|
$ |
4,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the date indicated, the assets and liabilities above were presented on Cienas Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,280 |
|
|
$ |
4,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cienas Level 1 asset is a corporate equity security publicly traded on a major exchange that
is valued using quoted prices in active markets.
Cienas Level 3 asset reflects the embedded redemption feature contained within Cienas 4.0%
convertible senior notes. See Note 16 below. The embedded redemption feature is bifurcated from
Cienas 4.0% convertible senior notes using the with-and-without approach. As such, the total
value of the embedded redemption feature is calculated as the difference between the value of the
4.0% convertible senior notes (the Hybrid Instrument) and the value of an identical instrument
without the embedded redemption feature (the Host Instrument). Both the Host Instrument and the
Hybrid Instrument are valued using a modified binomial model. The modified binomial model utilizes
a risk free interest rate, an implied volatility of Cienas stock, the recovery rates of bonds, and
the implied default intensity of the 4.0% convertible senior notes.
As of the dates indicated, the following table sets forth, in thousands, the reconciliation of
changes in Level 3 fair value measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Balance at October 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
1,710 |
|
Changes in unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
2,570 |
|
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
4,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of outstanding convertible notes
At July 31, 2010, the fair value of the outstanding $500.0 million of 0.875% convertible
senior notes, $375.0 million of 4.0% convertible senior notes and $298.0 million of 0.25%
convertible senior notes was $337.5 million, $357.4 million and $264.9 million, respectively. Fair
value for the 0.875% and the 0.25% convertible senior notes is based on the quoted market price for
the notes on the date above. Due to the lack of trading activity, fair value of the 4.0%
convertible senior notes is based on a modified binomial model as described above.
(9) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
As of October 31, 2009, one customer accounted for 10.7% of net accounts receivable, and as
of July 31, 2010, no customers accounted for greater than 10.0% of net accounts receivable.
Cienas allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on managements assessment, on a
specific identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. As of October 31, 2009
and July 31, 2010, allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.1 million.
17
(10) INVENTORIES
As of the dates indicated, inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
19,694 |
|
|
$ |
26,606 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
6,021 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
90,914 |
|
|
|
220,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,088 |
|
|
|
252,671 |
|
Provision for excess and obsolescence |
|
|
(24,002 |
) |
|
|
(30,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
88,086 |
|
|
$ |
222,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ciena writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory in
an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value,
based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. During the first nine months of
fiscal 2010, Ciena recorded a provision for excess and obsolescence of $10.7 million, primarily
due to product rationalization decisions in connection with the acquisition of the MEN Business.
Deductions from the provision for excess and obsolete inventory relate to disposal activities. The
following table summarizes the activity in Cienas reserve for excess and obsolete inventory for
the period indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
Reserve balance as of October 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
24,002 |
|
Provision for excess for obsolescence |
|
|
10,749 |
|
Actual inventory disposed |
|
|
(4,244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
30,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the first nine months of fiscal 2009, Ciena recorded a provision for excess and
obsolete inventory of $11.1 million, primarily related to changes in forecasted sales for certain
products. Deductions from the provision for excess and obsolete inventory relate to disposal
activities. The following table summarizes the activity in Cienas reserve for excess and obsolete
inventory for the period indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
Reserve balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
23,257 |
|
Provision for excess and obsolescence |
|
|
11,126 |
|
Actual inventory disposed |
|
|
(12,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
21,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
(11) PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER
As of the dates indicated, prepaid expenses and other are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
$ |
993 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Prepaid VAT and other taxes |
|
|
14,527 |
|
|
|
43,845 |
|
Deferred deployment expense |
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
6,797 |
|
Product demonstration equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,573 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
16,480 |
|
Capitalized acquisition costs |
|
|
12,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
7,477 |
|
|
|
14,943 |
|
Other non-trade receivables |
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
|
7,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,537 |
|
|
$ |
118,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other as of July 31, 2010 include $28.6 million related to product
demonstration equipment, net acquired as part of the MEN Business. Depreciation of product
demonstration equipment was $2.3 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2010. Capitalized
acquisition costs at October 31, 2009 include direct costs related to Cienas then pending
acquisition of the MEN Business. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Ciena adopted newly issued
accounting guidance related to business combinations, which required the full amount of these
capitalized acquisition costs to be expensed in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
18
(12) EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE AND FIXTURES
As of the dates indicated, equipment, furniture and fixtures are comprised of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
$ |
293,093 |
|
|
$ |
353,752 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
45,761 |
|
|
|
48,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,854 |
|
|
|
402,659 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(276,986 |
) |
|
|
(283,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,868 |
|
|
$ |
118,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures, and amortization of leasehold improvements
was $16.3 million and $25.8 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and 2010,
respectively.
(13) OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
As of the dates indicated, other intangible assets are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Intangible |
|
Finite-lived intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology |
|
$ |
185,833 |
|
|
$ |
(147,504 |
) |
|
$ |
38,329 |
|
|
$ |
406,833 |
|
|
$ |
(173,694 |
) |
|
$ |
233,139 |
|
Patents and licenses |
|
|
47,370 |
|
|
|
(42,811 |
) |
|
|
4,559 |
|
|
|
45,388 |
|
|
|
(44,868 |
) |
|
|
520 |
|
Customer
relationships, covenants not to compete, outstanding purchase orders and contracts |
|
|
60,981 |
|
|
|
(43,049 |
) |
|
|
17,932 |
|
|
|
323,228 |
|
|
|
(97,277 |
) |
|
|
225,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finite-lived intangibles |
|
|
294,184 |
|
|
|
(233,364 |
) |
|
|
60,820 |
|
|
|
775,449 |
|
|
|
(315,839 |
) |
|
|
459,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indefinite-lived intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets |
|
$ |
294,184 |
|
|
$ |
(233,364 |
) |
|
$ |
60,820 |
|
|
$ |
786,449 |
|
|
$ |
(315,839 |
) |
|
$ |
470,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortization expense of finite-lived other intangible assets was $23.8 million and
$72.6 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and 2010, respectively. In addition, during
the first nine months of fiscal 2010, revenue was reduced by $9.9 million related to the
amortization of contract assets from the acquisition of the MEN Business. In-process research and
development assets are impaired, if abandoned, or amortized in future periods, depending upon the
ability of Ciena to use the research and development in future periods. See Note 3 above for
information pertaining to newly acquired intangible assets related to the MEN Business. Expected
future amortization of finite-lived other intangible assets for the fiscal years indicated is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Period ended October 31, |
|
|
|
|
2010 (remaining three months) |
|
$ |
47,661 |
|
2011 |
|
|
91,373 |
|
2012 |
|
|
71,993 |
|
2013 |
|
|
69,573 |
|
2014 |
|
|
55,415 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
123,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
459,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
19
(14) OTHER BALANCE SHEET DETAILS
As of the dates indicated, other long-term assets are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Maintenance spares inventory, net |
|
$ |
31,994 |
|
|
$ |
53,237 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
18,792 |
|
|
|
30,172 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs, net |
|
|
12,832 |
|
|
|
20,904 |
|
Embedded redemption feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
Investments in privately held companies |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,902 |
|
|
$ |
112,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred debt issuance costs are amortized using the straight line method which approximates
the effect of the effective interest rate method on the maturity of the related debt. Amortization
of debt issuance costs, which is included in interest expense, was $1.7 million and $2.6 million
during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, respectively.
As of the dates indicated, accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Warranty |
|
$ |
40,196 |
|
|
$ |
64,510 |
|
Compensation, payroll related tax and benefits |
|
|
20,025 |
|
|
|
29,906 |
|
Vacation |
|
|
11,508 |
|
|
|
17,706 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
6,370 |
|
Other |
|
|
29,575 |
|
|
|
59,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
103,349 |
|
|
$ |
178,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the activity in Cienas accrued warranty for the fiscal periods
indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end of |
|
July 31, |
|
Balance |
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
period |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
37,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,620 |
|
|
|
(11,498 |
) |
|
$ |
39,380 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
40,196 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
16,388 |
|
|
|
(18,074 |
) |
|
$ |
64,510 |
|
As of the dates indicated, deferred revenue is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Products |
|
$ |
11,998 |
|
|
$ |
15,132 |
|
Services |
|
|
63,935 |
|
|
|
75,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,933 |
|
|
|
90,777 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(40,565 |
) |
|
|
(58,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
$ |
35,368 |
|
|
$ |
32,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15) FOREIGN CURRENCY FORWARD CONTRACTS
Ciena has previously used, and may in the future use, foreign currency forward contracts to
reduce variability in non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expenses. Ciena uses these derivatives
to partially offset its market exposure to fluctuations in certain foreign currencies. These
derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges. The effective portion of the derivatives gain or
loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and,
upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified into the operating
expense line item to which the hedged transaction relates. Ciena records the ineffective portion of
the hedging instruments in interest and other income, net. As of October 31, 2009 and July 31,
2010, there were no foreign currency forward contracts outstanding and Ciena did not enter into any
foreign currency forward contracts during the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
20
Cienas foreign currency forward contracts are classified as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified to Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Statement of |
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
Operations |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
(283 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(975 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Other |
|
|
Recognized in Other Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,904 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,420 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,904 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,420 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Statement of |
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
Operations |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16) CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
Ciena 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes, due March 15, 2015
On March 15, 2010, Ciena completed a private placement of 4.0% convertible senior notes due
March 15, 2015, in aggregate principal amount of $375.0 million (the Notes). Interest is payable
on the Notes on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2010. The Notes
are senior unsecured obligations of Ciena and rank equally with all of Cienas other existing and
future senior unsecured debt.
At the election of the holder, the Notes may be converted prior to maturity into shares of
Ciena common stock at the initial conversion rate of 49.0557 shares per $1,000 in principal amount,
which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $20.38 per share. The Notes may
be redeemed by Ciena on or after March 15, 2013 if the closing sale price of Cienas common stock
for at least 20 trading days in any 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the date one day
prior to the date of the notice of redemption exceeds 150% of the conversion price. Ciena may
redeem the Notes in whole or in part, at a redemption price in cash equal to the principal amount
to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional interest to, but
excluding, the redemption date, plus a make-whole premium payment. The make whole premium
payment will be made in cash and equal the present value of the remaining interest payments, to
maturity,
computed using a discount rate equal to 2.75%. The make-whole premium
is paid to holders whether or not they convert the Notes following
Cienas issuance of a redemption notice. For accounting purposes, this redemption feature is
an embedded derivative that is not clearly and closely related to the
Notes. Consequently, it was initially bifurcated from the indenture
and separately recorded at its fair value as an asset with subsequent changes in fair value recorded through earnings.
As of July 31, 2010, the fair value of the embedded redemption
feature was $4.3 million and is included in other long-term assets on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Since inception on March 15, 2010, the changes in fair value of the
embedded redemption feature in the amount of $2.6 million were reflected as interest and other
income (loss), net on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes have not been registered for
resale on a shelf registration statement. In some instances, Cienas failure to timely file
periodic reports with the SEC or remove restrictive legends on the Notes may require it to pay
additional interest on the Notes; which will accrue at the rate of 0.50% per annum of the principal
amount of Notes outstanding for each day such failure to file or to remove the restrictive legend
has occurred and is continuing.
If Ciena undergoes a fundamental change (as that term is defined in the indenture governing
the Notes to include certain change in control transactions), holders of Notes will have the right,
subject to certain exemptions, to require Ciena to purchase for cash any or all of their Notes at a
price equal to the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the holder elects to
convert his or her Notes in connection with a specified fundamental change, in certain
circumstances, Ciena will be required to increase the applicable conversion rate, depending on the price paid per share
for Ciena common stock and the effective date of the fundamental change transaction.
21
The indenture governing the Notes provides for customary events of default which include
(subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), among others, the following:
nonpayment of principal or interest; breach of covenants or other agreements in the Indenture;
defaults in failure to pay certain other indebtedness; and certain events of bankruptcy or
insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs and is continuing, the trustee or the holders
of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the Notes may declare the principal of, accrued
interest on, and premium, if any, on all the Notes immediately due and payable.
The net proceeds from the offering of the Notes were $364.3 million after deducting the
placement agents fees and other fees and expenses. Ciena used $243.8 million of this amount to
fund its payment election to replace its contractual obligation to issue convertible notes to
Nortel as part of the aggregate purchase price for the acquisition of the MEN Business. The
remaining proceeds were used to reduce the cash on hand required to fund the aggregate purchase
price of the MEN Business. See Note 3 above.
(17) EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE CALCULATION
The following table (in thousands except per share amounts) is a reconciliation of the
numerator and denominator of the basic net income (loss) per common share (Basic EPS) and the
diluted net income (loss) per potential common share (Diluted EPS). Basic EPS is computed using
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed using the
weighted average number of (i) common shares outstanding, (ii) shares issuable upon vesting of
restricted stock units, (iii) shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, employee
stock purchase plan options and warrants using the treasury stock method; and (iv) shares
underlying Cienas outstanding convertible notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
Numerator |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(26,454 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,855 |
) |
|
$ |
(554,495 |
) |
|
$ |
(253,197 |
) |
Add: Interest expense for 0.250% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Interest expense for 4.000% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Interest expense for 0.875% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss used to calculate diluted EPS |
|
$ |
(26,454 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,855 |
) |
|
$ |
(554,495 |
) |
|
$ |
(253,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
Denominator |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
91,364 |
|
|
|
92,906 |
|
|
|
90,970 |
|
|
|
92,851 |
|
Add: Shares underlying outstanding stock options, employees
stock purchase plan options, warrants and restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Shares underlying 0.250% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Shares underlying 4.000% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Shares underlying 0.875% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
91,364 |
|
|
|
92,906 |
|
|
|
90,970 |
|
|
|
92,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
EPS |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Basic EPS |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanation of Shares Excluded due to Anti-Dilutive Effect
For the quarters and nine months ended July 31, 2009 and July 31, 2010, the weighted average
number of shares underlying outstanding stock options, employee stock purchase plan options,
restricted stock units, and warrants set forth in the table below are considered anti-dilutive
because Ciena incurred a net loss. In addition, the shares, representing the weighted average
number of shares issuable upon conversion of Cienas outstanding convertible senior notes, are
considered anti-dilutive because the related interest expense on a per common share if converted
basis exceeds Basic EPS for the period.
22
The following table summarizes the shares excluded from the calculation of the denominator for
Basic and Diluted EPS due to their anti-dilutive effect for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
Shares excluded from EPS Denominator due to anti-dilutive effect |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Shares underlying stock options, restricted stock units and warrants |
|
|
8,249 |
|
|
|
7,171 |
|
|
|
8,161 |
|
|
|
8,171 |
|
0.25% convertible senior notes |
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
4.0% convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,333 |
|
0.875% convertible senior notes |
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excluded due to anti-dilutive effect |
|
|
28,896 |
|
|
|
46,214 |
|
|
|
28,808 |
|
|
|
38,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18) SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE
Ciena grants equity awards under its 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2008 Plan) and 2003
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). These plans were approved by shareholders and are described
in Cienas annual report on Form 10-K. In connection with its acquisition of the MEN Business,
Ciena also adopted the 2010 Inducement Equity Award Plan, pursuant to which it has made awards to
eligible persons as described below.
2008 Plan
Ciena has previously granted stock options and restricted stock units under its 2008 Plan.
Pursuant to Board and stockholder approval, effective April 14, 2010, Ciena amended its 2008 Plan
to (i) increase the number of shares available for issuance by five million shares; and (ii) reduce
from 1.6 to 1.31 the fungible share ratio used for counting full value awards, such as restricted
stock units, against the shares remaining available under the 2008 Plan. As of July 31, 2010, there
were approximately 5.8 million shares authorized and remaining available for issuance under the
2008 Plan.
2010 Inducement Equity Award Plan
On December 8, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the 2010
Inducement Equity Award Plan (the 2010 Plan). The 2010 Plan is intended to enhance Cienas
ability to attract and retain certain key employees transferred to Ciena in connection with its
acquisition of the MEN Business. The 2010 Plan authorizes the issuance of restricted stock or
restricted stock units representing up to 2.25 million shares of Ciena common stock. Upon the March
19, 2011 termination of the 2010 Plan, any shares then remaining available shall cease to be
available for issuance under the 2010 Plan or any other existing Ciena equity incentive plan. As of
July 31, 2010, there were approximately 0.7 million shares authorized and available for issuance
under the 2010 Plan.
Stock Options
Outstanding stock option awards to employees are generally subject to service-based vesting
restrictions and vest incrementally over a four-year period. The following table is a summary of
Cienas stock option activity for the periods indicated (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 |
|
|
5,538 |
|
|
$ |
45.80 |
|
Granted |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
12.40 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
5.09 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
85.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2010 |
|
|
5,105 |
|
|
$ |
42.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the first nine months of fiscal
2009 and fiscal 2010, was $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively. The weighted average fair
values of each stock option granted by Ciena during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal
2010 were $4.66 and $6.95, respectively.
23
The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding at July
31, 2010, based on Cienas closing stock price of $13.09 per share on the last trading day of
Cienas third fiscal quarter of 2010 (shares and intrinsic value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding at July 31, 2010 |
|
|
Vested Options at July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Exercise |
|
|
of |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
of |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
$ |
16.52 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
|
$ |
11.10 |
|
|
$ |
2,910 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
$ |
11.48 |
|
|
$ |
2,177 |
|
$ |
16.53 |
|
|
|
$ |
17.43 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
|
17.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
|
|
|
17.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.44 |
|
|
|
$ |
22.96 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
|
21.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
21.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22.97 |
|
|
|
$ |
31.71 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
|
|
|
29.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
4.18 |
|
|
|
29.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31.72 |
|
|
|
$ |
46.90 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
|
|
|
39.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
39.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46.91 |
|
|
|
$ |
73.78 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
|
|
59.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
|
|
59.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73.79 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,046.50 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
166.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
166.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,046.50 |
|
|
|
5,105 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
$ |
42.68 |
|
|
$ |
2,910 |
|
|
|
4,487 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
$ |
45.41 |
|
|
$ |
2,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions for Option-Based Awards
Ciena recognizes the fair value of service-based options as share-based compensation expense
on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Ciena estimates the fair value of each
option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following
weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
Expected volatility |
|
65.0% |
|
61.9% |
|
65.0% |
|
61.9% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
2.8 3.1% |
|
2.4% |
|
1.7 3.1% |
|
2.4 3.0% |
Expected
life (years) |
|
5.2 5.3 |
|
5.3 5.5 |
|
5.2 5.3 |
|
5.3 5.5 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
Ciena considered the implied volatility and historical volatility of its stock price in
determining its expected volatility, and, finding both to be equally reliable, determined that a
combination of both would result in the best estimate of expected volatility.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for
the expected term of Cienas employee stock options.
The expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period during
which the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. Ciena gathered detailed historical
information about specific exercise behavior of its grantees, which it used to determine the
expected term.
The dividend yield assumption is based on Cienas history of not making dividends and its
expectation of future dividend payouts.
Because share-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are
ultimately expected to vest, the amount of share-based compensation expense recognized reflects a
reduction for estimated forfeitures. Ciena estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises
those estimates in subsequent periods based upon new or changed information. Ciena relies upon
historical experience in establishing forfeiture rates. If actual forfeitures differ from current
estimates, total unrecognized share-based compensation expense will be adjusted for future changes
in estimated forfeitures.
Restricted Stock Units
A restricted stock unit is a stock award that entitles the holder to receive shares of Ciena
common stock as the unit vests. Cienas outstanding restricted stock unit awards are subject to
service-based vesting conditions and/or performance-based vesting conditions. Awards subject to
service-based conditions typically vest in increments over a three to four year period.
24
Awards with performance-based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain
operational, financial or other performance criteria or targets as a condition of vesting, or
acceleration of vesting, of such awards.
Cienas outstanding restricted stock units include performance-accelerated restricted stock
units (PARS), which vest in full four years after the date of grant (assuming that the grantee is
still employed by Ciena at that time). Under the PARS, the Compensation Committee may establish
performance targets which, if satisfied, provide for the acceleration of vesting of that portion of
the award designated by the Compensation Committee. As a result, the grantee may have the
opportunity, subject to satisfaction of performance conditions, to vest as to the entire award
prior to the expiration of the four-year period above. Ciena recognizes the estimated fair value of
performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense over the performance
period, using graded vesting, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, based
upon Cienas determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved.
At each reporting period, Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and
the performance period required to meet those targets.
The aggregate intrinsic value of Cienas restricted stock units is based on Cienas closing
stock price on the last trading day of each period as indicated. The following table is a summary
of Cienas restricted stock unit activity for the periods indicated, with the aggregate intrinsic
value of the balance outstanding at the end of each period, based on Cienas closing stock price on
the last trading day of the relevant period (shares and aggregate intrinsic value in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Stock Units |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,716 |
|
|
$ |
14.67 |
|
|
$ |
43,591 |
|
Granted |
|
|
3,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2010 |
|
|
5,626 |
|
|
$ |
13.76 |
|
|
$ |
73,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted stock units that vested and were converted into common
stock during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 was $7.7 million and $19.0
million, respectively. The weighted average fair value of each restricted stock unit granted by
Ciena during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 was $6.97 and $13.43,
respectively.
Assumptions for Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The fair value of each restricted stock unit award is estimated using the intrinsic value
method, which is based on the closing price on the date of grant. Share-based expense for
service-based restricted stock unit awards is recognized, net of estimated forfeitures, ratably
over the vesting period on a straight-line basis.
Share-based expense for performance-based restricted stock unit awards, net of estimated
forfeitures, is recognized ratably over the performance period based upon Cienas determination of
whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period,
Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period
required to meet those targets. The estimation of whether the performance targets will be achieved
involves judgment, and the estimate of expense is revised periodically based on the probability of
achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is
changed. If any performance goals are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized
against that goal and, to the extent previously recognized, compensation cost is reversed.
2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The ESPP is a non-compensatory plan and issuances thereunder do not result in share-based
compensation expense. The following table is a summary of ESPP activity and shares available for
issuance for the periods indicated (shares in thousands):
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESPP shares available |
|
|
Intrinsic value at |
|
|
|
for issuance |
|
|
exercise date |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
Evergreen provision |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued March 15, 2010 |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2010 |
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Expense for Periods Reported
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense for the periods indicated (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Product costs |
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
$ |
1,618 |
|
|
$ |
1,475 |
|
Service costs |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense included in cost of sales |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
2,859 |
|
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
7,814 |
|
|
|
6,948 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
2,902 |
|
|
|
8,028 |
|
|
|
8,025 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
7,813 |
|
|
|
7,349 |
|
Acquisition and integration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense included in operating expense |
|
|
7,692 |
|
|
|
8,560 |
|
|
|
23,655 |
|
|
|
23,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense capitalized in inventory, net |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation |
|
$ |
8,484 |
|
|
$ |
9,651 |
|
|
$ |
26,075 |
|
|
$ |
26,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2010, total unrecognized compensation expense was $72.4 million: (i) $7.0
million, which relates to unvested stock options and is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 0.9 years; and (ii) $65.4 million, which relates to unvested restricted
stock units and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
(19) COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The components of comprehensive loss were as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(26,454 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,855 |
) |
|
$ |
(554,495 |
) |
|
$ |
(253,197 |
) |
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on
available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
Change in unrealized gain on foreign forward contracts |
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accumulated translation adjustments |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
(728 |
) |
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
(1,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(24,634 |
) |
|
$ |
(110,583 |
) |
|
$ |
(551,433 |
) |
|
$ |
(254,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20) SEGMENT AND ENTITY WIDE DISCLOSURES
Segment Reporting
Effective upon the March 19, 2010 completion of Cienas acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena
reorganized its internal organizational structure and the management of its business. Cienas chief
operating decision maker, its chief executive officer, evaluates performance and allocates
resources based on multiple factors, including segment profit (loss) information for the following
product categories:
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Transport includes optical transport solutions that increase network
capacity and enable delivery of a broader mix of high-bandwidth services. These products
are used by network operators to facilitate the cost effective and efficient transport of
voice, video and data traffic in core networks, as well as regional, metro and access
networks. Cienas principal products in this segment include its Optical Multiservice Edge
6500 (OME 6500); Optical Multiservice Edge 6110 (OME 6110); Optical Metro 5200 (OM5200);
Common Photonic Layer (CPL); Optical Multiservice Edge 1000 series; and Optical Metro 3500 (OM 3500). It includes
sales of our CN 4200 FlexSelect Advanced Services Platform and our Corestream® Agility
Optical Transport System. This segment also includes sales from legacy SONET/SDH products
and legacy data networking products, as well as certain enterprise-oriented transport
solutions that support storage and LAN extension, interconnection of data centers, and
virtual private networks. This segment also includes operating system software and enhanced
software features embedded in each of these products. |
26
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Switching includes optical switching platforms that enable automated
optical infrastructures for the delivery of a wide variety of enterprise and
consumer-oriented network services. Cienas principal products in this segment include its
CoreDirector® Multiservice Optical Switch; CoreDirector FS; and the 5430 Reconfigurable
Switching System. These products include multiservice, multi-protocol switching systems
that consolidate the functionality of an add/drop multiplexer, digital cross-connect and
packet switch into a single, high-capacity intelligent switching system. These products
address both the core and metro segments of communications networks and support key managed
service services, Ethernet/TDM Private Line, Triple Play and IP services. This segment also
includes sales of operating system software and enhanced software features embedded in each
of these products. |
|
|
|
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery - includes the CN 3900 family of service delivery
switches and service aggregation switches, including the CN 5100 family. These products
support the access and aggregation tiers of communications networks and have principally
been deployed to support wireless backhaul infrastructures and business data services.
Employing sophisticated Carrier Ethernet switching technology, these products deliver
quality of service capabilities, virtual local area networking and switching functions, and
carrier-grade operations, administration, and maintenance features. This segment includes
the metro Ethernet routing switch (MERS) product line and Cienas legacy broadband products
that transition legacy voice networks to support Internet-based (IP) telephony, video
services and DSL. This segment also includes sales of operating system software and
enhanced software features embedded in each of these products. |
|
|
|
Software and Services - includes Cienas integrated network and service management
software designed to automate and simplify network management and operation, while
increasing network performance and functionality. These software solutions can track
individual services across multiple product suites, facilitating planned network
maintenance, outage detection and identification of customers or services affected by
network troubles. This segment also includes a broad range of consulting and support
services offered within the Ciena Specialist Services practice, which include installation
and deployment, maintenance support, consulting, network design and training activities. |
Reportable segment asset information is not disclosed because it is not reviewed by the chief
operating decision maker for purposes of evaluating performance and allocating resources.
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth Cienas segment revenue,
including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable segments, for the
respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packet-Optical
Transport |
|
$ |
78,048 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
$ |
242,057 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
$ |
221,684 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
$ |
423,216 |
|
|
|
51.6 |
|
Packet-Optical
Switching |
|
|
37,503 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
124,841 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
90,638 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Carrier Ethernet
Service Delivery |
|
|
22,677 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
33,802 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
45,561 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
149,047 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Software and Services |
|
|
26,530 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
79,010 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
84,273 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
156,121 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue |
|
$ |
164,758 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
389,675 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
476,359 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
819,022 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
Segment Profit (Loss)
Segment profit (loss) is determined based on internal performance measures used by the chief
executive officer to assess
the performance of each operating segment in a given period. In connection with that
assessment, the chief executive officer excludes the following items: selling and marketing costs;
general and administrative costs; acquisition and integration costs; amortization of intangible
assets; restructuring costs; goodwill impairment; interest and other income (net), interest
expense, equity investment gains or losses, gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, and
provisions (benefit) for income taxes.
27
The table below (in thousands) sets forth Cienas segment profit (loss) and the reconciliation
to consolidated net income (loss) including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change
in reportable operating segments during the respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Segment profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Transport |
|
$ |
12,807 |
|
|
$ |
12,874 |
|
|
$ |
20,282 |
|
|
$ |
26,402 |
|
Packet-Optical Switching |
|
|
10,443 |
|
|
|
10,320 |
|
|
|
43,325 |
|
|
|
13,749 |
|
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery |
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
(3,212 |
) |
|
|
(12,323 |
) |
|
|
31,642 |
|
Software and Services |
|
|
4,398 |
|
|
|
23,158 |
|
|
|
15,320 |
|
|
|
35,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment profit (loss) |
|
|
30,223 |
|
|
|
43,140 |
|
|
|
66,604 |
|
|
|
107,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
(31,468 |
) |
|
|
(52,127 |
) |
|
|
(98,582 |
) |
|
|
(131,692 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(11,524 |
) |
|
|
(32,649 |
) |
|
|
(35,724 |
) |
|
|
(66,915 |
) |
Acquisition and integration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,285 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(6,224 |
) |
|
|
(38,727 |
) |
|
|
(18,852 |
) |
|
|
(61,829 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
(3,941 |
) |
|
|
(2,157 |
) |
|
|
(10,416 |
) |
|
|
(3,985 |
) |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(455,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest and other financial charges, net |
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
|
(8,658 |
) |
|
|
3,615 |
|
|
|
(11,624 |
) |
Loss on cost method investments |
|
|
(2,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
(1,644 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss |
|
$ |
(26,454 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,855 |
) |
|
$ |
(554,495 |
) |
|
$ |
(253,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entity Wide Reporting
The following table reflects Cienas geographic distribution of revenue based on the location
of the purchaser, with any country accounting for greater than 10% of total revenue in the period
specifically identified. Revenue attributable to geographic regions outside of the United States
and the United Kingdom is reflected as Other International revenue. For the periods below,
Cienas geographic distribution of revenue was as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
United States |
|
$ |
104,041 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
|
|
$ |
229,739 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
|
$ |
294,688 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
$ |
534,174 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
23,439 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,737 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Other International |
|
|
37,278 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
159,936 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
112,934 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
284,848 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
164,758 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
389,675 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
476,359 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
819,022 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes revenue representing less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
The following table reflects Cienas geographic distribution of equipment, furniture and
fixtures, with any country accounting for greater than 10% of total equipment, furniture and
fixtures specifically identified. Equipment, furniture and fixtures attributable to geographic
regions outside of the United States and Canada are reflected as Other International. For the
periods below, Cienas geographic distribution of equipment, furniture and fixtures was as follows
(in thousands, except percentage data):
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
United States |
|
$ |
47,875 |
|
|
|
77.4 |
|
|
$ |
61,747 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
Canada |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,778 |
|
|
|
37.7 |
|
Other International |
|
|
13,993 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
12,230 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
61,868 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
118,755 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes equipment, furniture and fixtures representing less than 10% of total equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total equipment, furniture and fixtures |
For the periods below, customers accounting for at least 10% of Cienas revenue were as
follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
Company A |
|
$ |
20,005 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,244 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company B |
|
|
18,041 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company C |
|
|
22,268 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
90,769 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
94,928 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
204,092 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
Company D |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,556 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
60,314 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
$ |
131,325 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
$ |
148,172 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
$ |
204,092 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes revenue representing less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
(21) CONTINGENCIES
Foreign Tax Contingencies
Ciena has received assessment notices from the Mexican tax authorities asserting deficiencies
in payments between 2001 and 2005 related primarily to income taxes and import taxes and duties.
Ciena has filed judicial petitions appealing these assessments. As of October 31, 2009 and July 31,
2010, Ciena had accrued liabilities of $1.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, related to
these contingencies, which are reported as a component of other current accrued liabilities. As of
July 31, 2010, Ciena estimates that it could be exposed to possible losses of up to $5.8 million,
for which it has not accrued liabilities. Ciena has not accrued the additional income tax
liabilities because it does not believe that such losses are more likely than not to be incurred.
Ciena has not accrued the additional import taxes and duties because it does not believe the
incurrence of such losses are probable. Ciena continues to evaluate the likelihood of probable and
reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these assessments. As a result, future increases or
decreases to accrued liabilities may be necessary and will be recorded in the period when such
amounts are estimable and more likely than not (for income taxes) or probable (for non-income
taxes).
In addition to the matters described above, Ciena is subject to various tax liabilities
arising in the ordinary course of business. Ciena does not expect that the ultimate settlement of
these liabilities will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or
cash flows.
Litigation
On May 29, 2008, Graywire, LLC filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Georgia against Ciena and four other defendants, alleging, among other things,
that certain of the parties products infringe U.S. Patent 6,542,673 (the 673 Patent), relating
to an identifier system and components for optical assemblies. The complaint, which seeks
injunctive relief and damages, was served upon Ciena on January 20, 2009. Ciena filed an answer to
the complaint and counterclaims against Graywire on March 26, 2009, and an amended answer and
counterclaims on April 17, 2009. On April 27, 2009, Ciena and certain other defendants filed an
application for inter partes reexamination of the 673 Patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office (the PTO). On the same date, Ciena and the other defendants filed a motion to stay the
case pending reexamination of all of the patents-in-suit. On July 17, 2009, the district court
granted the defendants motion to stay the case. On July 23, 2009, the PTO granted the defendants
application for reexamination with respect to certain claims of the 673 Patent. Ciena believes
that it has valid defenses to the lawsuit and intends to defend it vigorously in the event the stay
of the case is lifted.
29
As a result of our June 2002 merger with ONI Systems Corp., Ciena became a defendant in a
securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York in August 2001. The complaint named ONI, certain former ONI officers, and certain underwriters of ONIs initial public offering (IPO)
as defendants, and alleges, among other things, that the underwriter defendants violated the
securities laws by failing to disclose alleged compensation arrangements in ONIs registration
statement and by engaging in manipulative practices to artificially inflate ONIs stock price after
the IPO. The complaint also alleges that ONI and the named former officers violated the securities
laws by failing to disclose the underwriters alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative
practices. The former ONI officers have been dismissed from the action without prejudice. Similar
complaints have been filed against more than 300 other issuers that have had initial public
offerings since 1998, and all of these actions have been included in a single coordinated
proceeding. On October 6, 2009, the Court entered an opinion granting final approval to a
settlement among the plaintiffs, issuer defendants and underwriter defendants, and directing that
the Clerk of the Court close these actions. Notices of appeal of the opinion granting final
approval have been filed. A description of this litigation and the history of the proceedings can
be found in Item 3. Legal Proceedings of Part I of Cienas Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2009. No specific amount of damages has been
claimed in this action. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and because the settlement
remains subject to appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is uncertain.
In addition to the matters described above, Ciena is subject to various legal proceedings,
claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Ciena does not expect that the
ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material effect on its results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Some of the statements contained, or incorporated by reference, in this quarterly report
discuss future events or expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial
condition, changes in the markets for our products and services, or state other forward-looking
information. Cienas forward-looking information is based on various factors and was derived
using numerous assumptions. In some cases, you can identify these forward-looking statements by
words like may, will, should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates,
predicts, potential or continue or the negative of those words and other comparable words.
You should be aware that these statements only reflect our current predictions and beliefs. These
statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and actual
events or results may differ materially. Important factors that could cause our actual results to
be materially different from the forward-looking statements are disclosed throughout this report,
particularly in Item 1A Risk Factors of Part II of this report below. You should review these
risk factors and the rest of this quarterly report in combination with the more detailed
description of our business and managements discussion and analysis of financial condition in our
annual report on Form 10-K, which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December
22, 2009, for a more complete understanding of the risks associated with an investment in Cienas
securities. Ciena undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a provider of communications networking equipment, software and services that support
the transport, switching, aggregation and management of voice, video and data traffic. Our
Packet-Optical Transport, Packet-Optical Switching and Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products
are used, individually or as part of an integrated solution, in networks operated by communications
service providers, cable operators, governments and enterprises around the globe.
We are a network specialist targeting the transition of disparate, legacy communications
networks to converged, next-generation architectures, better able to handle increased traffic
volumes and deliver more efficiently a broader mix of high-bandwidth communications services at a
lower cost. Our products, through their embedded network element software and our network service
and transport management software suites, enable network operators to efficiently and
cost-effectively deliver critical enterprise and consumer-oriented communication services. Together
with our professional support and consulting services, our product offerings seek to enable
software-defined, automated networks that address the business challenges, communications
infrastructure requirements and service needs of our customers. Our customers face a challenging
and rapidly changing environment. This environment requires that our customers networks be able to
address growing capacity needs from wireless and broadband adoption and quickly adapt to execute
new business strategies and support the delivery of innovative revenue-creating services. By
improving network productivity and automation, reducing operating costs and providing flexibility
to enable new and integrated service offerings, our equipment, software and services solutions
create business and operational value for our customers.
Our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual reports on Form 10-K and current reports on Form
8-K filed with the SEC are available through the SECs website at www.sec.gov or free of charge on
our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these documents. We routinely post the
reports above, recent news and announcements, financial results and other important information
about Ciena on our website at www.ciena.com.
30
Acquisition of Nortel Metro Ethernet Networks Business (the MEN Acquisition)
On March 19, 2010, we completed our acquisition of substantially all of the optical networking
and Carrier Ethernet assets of Nortels Metro Ethernet Networks business (the MEN Business). In
accordance with the agreements for the acquisition, the initial $773.8 million aggregate purchase price for
the acquisition, which was payable in cash and convertible notes, was subsequently adjusted downward by $80.6 million based upon the amount of net
working capital transferred to Ciena at closing. Prior to closing, we elected to replace the
$239.0 million in aggregate principal of convertible notes that were to be issued to Nortel as part
of the aggregate purchase price with cash equivalent to 102% of the face amount of the notes
replaced, or $243.8 million. We completed a private placement of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due
March 15, 2015 in aggregate principal amount of
$375.0 million which funded this election and reduced the
amount of cash on hand required to fund the aggregate purchase price. See Private Placement of
$375 Million in Convertible Notes to Fund Purchase Price below for more information on the source of funds for this
payment election and the purchase price. As a result, the aggregate
purchase price was $693.2 million consisting
entirely of cash.
Rationale for MEN Acquisition
The MEN Business that we acquired is a leading provider of next-generation, communications
network equipment, with a significant global installed base and a strong technology heritage. The
MEN Business is a leader in high-capacity 40G and 100G coherent optical transport technology that
enables network operators to seamlessly upgrade their existing 2.5G and 10G networks, thereby
enabling a significant increase in network capacity without the need for new fiber deployments or
complex re-engineering. The product and technology assets that we acquired include:
|
|
|
long-haul optical transport portfolio; |
|
|
|
metro optical Ethernet switching and transport solutions; |
|
|
|
Ethernet transport, aggregation and switching technology; |
|
|
|
multiservice SONET/SDH product families; and |
|
|
|
network management software products. |
In addition to these hardware and software solutions, we also acquired the network implementation
and support service resources related to the MEN Business.
We believe that the MEN Acquisition represents a transformative opportunity for Ciena. We
believe that this transaction strengthens our position as a leader in next-generation, converged
optical Ethernet networking and will accelerate the execution of our corporate and research and
development strategies. We believe that the additional geographic reach, expanded customer
relationships, and broader portfolio of complementary network solutions derived from the MEN
Acquisition will help us better compete with traditional, larger network equipment vendors. We also
expect that the transaction will add desired scale to our business, enabling increased operating
leverage and providing an opportunity to optimize our research and development investment toward
next-generation technologies and product platforms.
Integration Activities and Costs
We continue to make progress on integration-related activities in connection with the MEN
Acquisition including the substantial completion of our organizational structure, sales coverage
plans, decisions regarding the rationalization of our combined product portfolio and, as described
in Restructuring Activities below, the realization of initial operating synergies from the MEN
Acquisition. Significant and complex additional integration efforts remain, including the
rationalization of our supply chain, third party manufacturers and facilities, the execution of our
combined product and software development plan, and our reduced reliance upon and winding down of
transition services provided by an affiliate of Nortel.
Given the magnitude of the MEN Acquisition and its structure as an asset carve-out from
Nortel, we expect that the integration of the MEN Business will be costly and complex, with a
number of operational risks. We expect to incur costs of approximately $180 million associated with
equipment and information technology, transaction expense, severance expense and consulting and
third party service fees associated with the integration, with the majority of these costs to be
incurred in fiscal 2010. In addition to these costs, we have incurred inventory obsolescence
charges and may incur additional expenses related to, among other things, facilities restructuring.
As a result, the expense we incur and recognize for financial statement purposes as a result of the
MEN Acquisition may be significantly higher than the estimate above. As of July 31, 2010, we have
incurred $83.3 million in transaction, consulting and third party service fees, $4.0 million in
severance expense, and an additional $10.8 million, primarily related to purchases of capitalized
information technology equipment. Any material delays or difficulties in integrating the MEN Business or additional, unanticipated expense
may harm our business and results of operations.
31
In addition to the costs above, we are incurring significant transition services expense as a
component of operating expense, principally general and administrative expense, and cost of goods
sold. We are currently relying upon an affiliate of Nortel to perform certain critical operational
and business support functions during an interim integration period that will continue until we can
perform these services ourselves or locate another provider. These support services include key
finance and accounting functions, supply chain and logistics management, maintenance and product
support services, order management and fulfillment, trade compliance, and information technology
services. We can utilize certain of these support services for a period of up to 24 months
following the MEN Acquisition (12 months in EMEA). These services are estimated to cost
approximately $94.0 million per year, were Ciena to utilize all of the transition services for a
full year. The actual expense we incur will depend upon the scope of the services that Ciena
utilizes and the time within which we are able to complete the planned transfer of these services
to internal resources or other providers. We expect to incur additional costs as we simultaneously
build up internal resources, including headcount, facilities and information systems, or engage
alternate third party providers, while we simultaneously rely upon and transition away from these
transition support services. The wind down and transfer of critical transition services is a
complex undertaking and may be costly and disruptive to our business and operations.
Effect of MEN Acquisition upon Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Due to the relative scale of the operations of the MEN Business, the MEN Acquisition has
materially affected our operations, financial results and liquidity. Our revenue and operating
expense have increased materially compared to periods prior to the acquisition. These and other
effects on our financial statements described below and elsewhere in this report may make period to
period comparisons difficult.
As a result of the MEN Acquisition, we recorded $38.1 million in goodwill and $492.0 million
in other intangible assets that will be amortized over their useful lives and increase our
operating expense. See Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates- Goodwill and -Long-lived Assets
below for information relating to these items. Under acquisition accounting rules, we revalued the
acquired finished goods inventory of the MEN Business to fair value upon closing. This revaluation
increased marketable inventory carrying value by approximately $39.7 million all of which was
recognized in cost of goods sold during the first nine months of fiscal 2010. See Note 3 of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report.
As expected, our liquidity and cash and investment balance was significantly affected by our
use of cash to fund the purchase price of the MEN Acquisition and resulting acquisition and
integration expense, transition service expense and investments to support working capital related
to the increased scale of our business. In addition, our private placement of a new issue of
convertible debt in March 2010, in part to fund the purchase
price of the MEN Business, resulted in
additional indebtedness. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below and Note 16 of the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report for more information
regarding the convertible notes.
Private Placement of $375 Million in Convertible Notes to Fund Purchase Price
On March 15, 2010, we completed a private offering of $375.0 million in aggregate principal
amount of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015. The net proceeds from the offering were
$364.3 million after deducting the placement agents fees and other fees and expenses. We used
$243.8 million of the net proceeds to replace the contractual obligation to issue convertible notes
to Nortel as part of the purchase price for the MEN Acquisition. The remaining proceeds were used
to reduce the cash on hand required to fund the aggregate purchase price of the MEN Acquisition.
See Note 16 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this
report for more information regarding the convertible notes.
Restructuring Activities
In April 2010, we took action to effect a headcount reduction of approximately 70 employees,
with reductions principally affecting our Global Product Group and Global Field Organization
outside of the EMEA region. This action resulted in a
restructuring charge of $1.8 in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and
$0.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. In May 2010, we informed
employees of our proposal to reorganize and restructure portions of our business and operations in
the EMEA region. This action is expected to involve the elimination of 120 to 140 roles, with reductions expected to principally affect employees in our Global Field
Organization and Global Supply Chain organization. Execution of any specific
reorganization is subject to local legal requirements, including
notification and consultation processes with
32
employees and employee representatives. We estimate completing the
reorganization by the first half of calendar year 2011. We expect total restructuring costs related to
this action to range from $8.0 million to $10.0 million. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010,
we recorded expenses of $1.9 million related to the reduction in
head count of approximately 26
employees in the Global Field Organization. These actions are intended to reduce operating expense
and better align our workforce and operating costs with market and business opportunities following
the completion of our MEN Acquisition. As we look to manage operating expense and complete
integration activities for the combined operations, we will continue to assess the allocation of
our headcount and other resources toward key growth opportunities for our business and evaluate
additional cost reduction measures.
Effect of Global Market Conditions and Competitive Landscape
We continue to experience cautious customer spending as a result of the sustained period of
economic weakness. Bread macroeconomic weakness has previously resulted in periods of decreased
demand for our products and services that have adversely affected our results of operations.
We remain uncertain as to how long current macroeconomic and industry conditions
will persist, the pace of recovery, and the magnitude of the effect of recent market conditions on
our business and results of operations.
At the same time we are experiencing challenging macroeconomic
conditions, we have encountered an increasingly
competitive marketplace. Competition has intensified, in part, due to our increased market share,
technology leadership and global presence resulting from the MEN Acquisition. Following the MEN
Acquisition, we have experienced increased customer activity and been afforded increased
consideration and opportunities to participate in competition for network builds and upgrades,
including in emerging geographies and new markets or applications for our products. Competition has
also intensified as we and our competitors more aggressively seek to secure market share,
particularly in connection with new network build opportunities, and displace incumbent equipment
vendors at large carrier customers. We expect this level of competition to continue and, as larger
Chinese equipment vendors seek to gain entry into the U.S. market, potentially increase.
The combination of market conditions, constraints on customer capital expenditures and
competition has resulted in a heightened customer focus on pricing and return on network
investment, as customers address network traffic growth and strive to increase revenue and margins.
Pricing pressure has been most severe in metro and core applications for our Packet-Optical
Transport platforms, which we expect to comprise a greater percentage of our overall revenue as a
result of the MEN Acquisition. As a result, and in an effort to retain or secure customers and
capture market share, in the past we have and in the future we may agree to pricing or other
unfavorable commercial terms that result in lower or negative gross margins on a particular order
or group of orders. These arrangements would adversely affect our gross margins and results of
operations.
Financial Results
Financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 reflect the first full quarter of
operations from the MEN Business. Our results for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 include
activity from the MEN Business since the March 19, 2010 acquisition date. We reorganized our
internal organizational structure and the management of our business upon the MEN Acquisition, and
as described in Note 20 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of
Part I of this report, present our results of operations based upon the following operating
segments: (i) Packet-Optical Transport; (ii) Packet-Optical Switching; (iii) Carrier Ethernet
Service Delivery; and (iv) Software and Services.
Revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was $389.7 million, representing a 53.7%
sequential increase from $253.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Third quarter revenue
reflects $221.8 million in revenue from the MEN Business and $167.9 million related to Cienas
pre-acquisition portfolio. Additional sequential revenue-related
details reflecting changes from the second quarter of fiscal 2010 include:
|
|
|
Product revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 increased by $106.0 million,
reflecting a $138.6 million increase in sales of products from the MEN Business and a $32.6
million decrease in sales of Cienas pre-acquisition products. Carrier Ethernet Service
Delivery revenue decreased by $41.0 million reflecting decreased spending by two
significant customers of these products for use in wireless backhaul applications. We believe that
these declines reflect the effect of cyclical purchasing activity for these customers and typical fluctuations in purchasing and deployment activity for longer-term
infrastructure build outs for relatively nascent technology
adoption. Packet-Optical Transport revenue increased by $144.4 million, reflecting a $136.1
million increase in sales of products from the MEN Business and $8.3 million increase in
Cienas pre-acquisition Packet-Optical Transport products. Sales of Packet-Optical
Switching products increased by $2.4 million. |
|
|
|
Service revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 increased by $30.2 million,
reflecting a $29.8 million increase in service revenue from the MEN Business and a $0.4
million increase in sales of Cienas pre-acquisition service offerings. |
|
|
|
Revenue from the U.S. for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was $229.7 million, an
increase from $180.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. This increase reflects a
$74.9 million increase in sales of products and services
from the MEN Business and a decrease of $25.7 million in sales of Cienas pre-acquisition
portfolio. |
33
|
|
|
International revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was $159.9 million, an
increase from $73.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. This increase reflects
$93.4 million in sales of products and services from the MEN Business and partially offset
by a decrease of $6.5 million in sales of Cienas pre-acquisition portfolio. |
|
|
|
As a percentage of revenue, international revenue was 41.0% during the third quarter of
fiscal 2010, an increase from 28.8% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. As a percentage
of Cienas pre-acquisition portfolio revenue, the portion attributable to international
revenue comprised 39.6%. |
|
|
|
For the third quarter of fiscal 2010, two customers each accounted for greater than 10%
of revenue and 33.7% in the aggregate. This compares to two customers that accounted for
42.3% of revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. |
Gross margin for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was 37.0% , down from 41.4% in the second
quarter of fiscal 2010. Gross margin for the third quarter was adversely affected by certain items
relating to the MEN Acquisition, including the revaluation of inventory described above and
increased amortization of intangible assets. The gross margin decline during the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 also reflects product mix, including increased concentration of Packet-Optical
Transport revenue from 38.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, to 62.1% in the third quarter of
fiscal 2010.
Operating expense was $243.6 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010, an increase from
$196.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 reflecting a full quarter of operations
following the MEN Acquisition. Operating expense for our second and third quarters of fiscal 2010
include $39.2 million and $17.0 million, respectively, in acquisition and integration-related costs
associated with the MEN Acquisition. Operating expense for the third quarter was also adversely
affected by an increase of $22.9 million in amortization of intangible assets from the second
quarter.
Our loss from operations for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was $99.6 million. This compares
to a $91.2 million loss from operations during the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Our net loss for
the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was $109.9 million, or $1.18 per share. This compares to a net
loss of $90.0 million, or $0.97 per share, for the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
We used $130.0 million in cash from operations during the third quarter of fiscal 2010,
consisting of $108.9 million for changes in working capital and $21.1 million from net losses
(adjusted for non-cash charges). Cash used from operations includes $25.0 million of acquisition
and integration-related expense, of which $17.0 million was reflected in net losses (adjusted for
non-cash charges) and $8.0 million was reflected in changes in working capital. This compares with
the use of $77.7 million in cash from operations during the second quarter of fiscal 2010,
consisting of a use of cash of $41.8 million from net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges) and a
use of cash of $35.9 million from changes in working capital. Use of cash for the second quarter
reflects cash payments of $38.0 million associated with acquisition and integration-related expense
and was reflected in the net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges).
At July 31, 2010, we had $470.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and $0.2 million of
short-term investments. This compares to $584.2 million in
cash and cash equivalents and $29.5 million of short-term investments securities
at April 30, 2010.
As of July 31, 2010, headcount was 4,214, an increase from 4,157 at April 30, 2010 and 2,110
at July 31, 2009.
Consolidated Results of Operations
Our results of operations for the periods in fiscal 2010, including the nine-month period
ended July 31, 2010, reflect the operations of the MEN Business beginning on the March 19, 2010
acquisition date.
Revenue
Revenue is discussed in the following product and service groupings:
|
1. |
|
Packet-Optical Transport. This product grouping, aligned with our
Packet-Optical Transport operating segment, reflects sales of our optical transport
products including the following products acquired from the MEN Business: Optical
Multiservice Edge 6500 (OME 6500); Optical Multiservice Edge 6110 (OME 6110); Optical
Metro 5200 (OM5200); Common Photonic Layer (CPL); Optical Multiservice Edge 1000
series; and Optical Metro 3500 (OM 3500). It includes sales of our CN 4200 FlexSelect
Advanced Services Platform and our Corestream® Agility Optical Transport System. This
group also includes sales from legacy SONET/SDH products and legacy data networking products, as well as certain
enterprise-oriented transport solutions that support storage and LAN extension,
interconnection of data centers, and virtual private networks. Revenue for this
grouping also includes the operating system software and enhanced software features
embedded in each of the products above. |
34
|
2. |
|
Packet-Optical Switching. This product grouping, aligned with our
Packet-Optical Switching operating segment, reflects sales of our CoreDirector®
Multiservice Optical Switch; CoreDirector-FS, an expansion of our CoreDirector platform
that delivers substantial new hardware and software features; and our 5430
Reconfigurable Switching System. Revenue for this grouping also includes the operating
system software and enhanced software features embedded in each of the products above. |
|
3. |
|
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery. This product grouping, aligned with our
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery operating segment, reflects sales of our CN 3900
family of service delivery switches and our service aggregation switches, including the
CN 5100 family. This product grouping also includes our metro Ethernet routing switch
(MERS) product line, broadband access products, and the operating system software and
enhanced software features embedded in these products. |
|
4. |
|
Unified Service and Network Management Software. This product grouping, aligned
with our Software and Services operating segment, reflects sales of
ON-Center® Network & Service Management Suite, our integrated network and
service management software designed to simplify network management and operation
across our portfolio. It also includes revenue from the Preside and OMEA software
platforms acquired from the MEN Business. |
|
5. |
|
Services. This service grouping, aligned with our Software and Services
operating segment, includes sales of installation and deployment services, maintenance
support, consulting services and training activities. |
A sizable portion of our revenue comes from sales to a small number of communications service
providers. While the MEN Acquisition may reduce our concentration of revenue somewhat, our revenue
remains closely tied to the prospects, performance, and financial condition of our largest service
provider customers. As a result, our results are significantly affected by the business challenges
encountered by our largest customers as well as market-wide conditions or shifts in competitive
landscape that adversely affect enterprise and consumer spending levels, the adoption and growth
of broadband services and the level of network infrastructure-related spending by communications
service providers. Our contracts do not have terms that obligate these customers to purchase any
minimum or specific amounts of equipment or services. Because customer spending may be
unpredictable and sporadic, and their purchases may result in the recognition or deferral of
significant amounts of revenue in a given quarter, our revenue can fluctuate on a quarterly basis.
Our concentration of revenue increases the risk of quarterly fluctuations in revenue and
operating results and can exacerbate our exposure to reductions in spending or changes in network
strategy involving one or more of our significant customers. Our concentration of revenue and
exposure to quarterly fluctuations can be adversely affected by consolidation activity among our
large customers. In April 2010, CenturyLink announced that it had agreed to acquire Qwest,
which has been a significant customer of Ciena in recent years. This
transaction may further increase our concentration of revenue. In addition, some of our customers are pursuing efforts
to outsource the management and operation of their networks, or have indicated a procurement
strategy to reduce the number of vendors from which they purchase equipment. In April 2010, we were
selected as a domain network equipment supplier by AT&T for its optical transport network and metro
and core transport domains. AT&T represented approximately 19.6% of our revenue in fiscal 2009 and
was a major customer of the MEN Business. Being named as a vendor in multiple technology domains
under this program affords us an opportunity to forge a more collaborative technology relationship
across these product platforms. Should sales to AT&T increase as a result of sales under this
program, our concentration of revenue may be adversely affected.
Cost of Goods Sold
Product cost of goods sold consists primarily of amounts paid to third-party contract
manufacturers, component costs, direct compensation costs and overhead, shipping and logistics
costs associated with manufacturing-related operations, warranty and other contractual obligations,
royalties, license fees, amortization of intangible assets and the cost of excess and obsolete
inventory.
Services cost of goods sold consists primarily of direct and third-party costs, including
personnel costs, associated with provision of services including installation, deployment,
maintenance support, consulting and training activities, and, when applicable, estimated losses on
committed customer contracts.
35
Gross Margin
Gross margin continues to be susceptible to quarterly fluctuation due to a number of factors.
Gross margin can vary significantly depending upon the mix and concentration of products, customers
and services in a given fiscal quarter. Gross margin can also be affected by geographic mix,
competitive environment and level of pricing pressure we encounter, our introduction of new
products, charges for excess and obsolete inventory, changes in warranty costs and sales volume.
Our gross margins have also been adversely affected in the past due to estimated losses on
committed customer contracts when entering a new market or securing a new customer and may be
affected by future efforts to capture market share. Gross margins will also be affected by our
level of success in driving cost reductions and rationalizing our supply chain and third party
contract manufacturers as part of the integration following the MEN Acquisition.
Service gross margin can be affected by the mix of customers and services, particularly the
mix between deployment and maintenance services, geographic mix and the timing and extent of any
investments in internal resources to support this business.
Operating Expense
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries and related employee expense
(including share-based compensation expense), prototype costs relating to design, development,
testing of our products, depreciation expense and third-party consulting costs.
Sales and marketing expense primarily consists of salaries, commissions and related employee
expense (including share-based compensation expense), and sales and marketing support expense,
including travel, demonstration units, trade show expense, and third-party consulting costs.
General and administrative expense primarily consists of salaries and related employee expense
(including share-based compensation expense), and costs for third-party consulting and other
services.
Amortization of intangible assets primarily reflects purchased technology and customer
relationships from our acquisitions.
Quarter ended July 31, 2009 compared to the quarter ended July 31, 2010
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost
of goods sold and gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
139,903 |
|
|
|
84.9 |
|
|
$ |
312,378 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
|
|
$ |
172,475 |
|
|
|
123.3 |
|
Services |
|
|
24,855 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
77,297 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
52,442 |
|
|
|
211.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
164,758 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
389,675 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
224,917 |
|
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
72,842 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
201,559 |
|
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
128,717 |
|
|
|
176.7 |
|
Services |
|
|
17,251 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
44,107 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
26,856 |
|
|
|
155.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
90,093 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
245,666 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
155,573 |
|
|
|
172.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
74,665 |
|
|
|
45.3 |
|
|
$ |
144,009 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
$ |
69,344 |
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product
revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit for the periods indicated:
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
139,903 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
312,378 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
172,475 |
|
|
|
123.3 |
|
Product cost of goods sold |
|
|
72,842 |
|
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
201,559 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
128,717 |
|
|
|
176.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product gross profit |
|
$ |
67,061 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
$ |
110,819 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
$ |
43,758 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of product revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in services
revenue, services cost of goods sold and services gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Services revenue |
|
$ |
24,855 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
77,297 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
52,442 |
|
|
|
211.0 |
|
Services cost of goods sold |
|
|
17,251 |
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
44,107 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
26,856 |
|
|
|
155.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services gross profit |
|
$ |
7,604 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
$ |
33,190 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
$ |
25,586 |
|
|
|
336.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of services revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
Revenue from sales to customers based outside of the United States is reflected as
International in the geographic distribution of revenue below. The table below (in thousands,
except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenue for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
United States |
|
$ |
104,041 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
|
|
$ |
229,739 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
|
$ |
125,698 |
|
|
|
120.8 |
|
International |
|
|
60,717 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
159,936 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
99,219 |
|
|
|
163.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
164,758 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
389,675 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
224,917 |
|
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
Certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenue for the periods
indicated (in thousands, except percentage data) as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
Company A |
|
$ |
20,005 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company B |
|
|
18,041 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company C |
|
|
22,268 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
90,769 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
Company D |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,556 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
60,314 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
$ |
131,325 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes revenue representing less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
Revenue
|
|
|
Product revenue increased due to a $164.0 million increase in sales of our
Packet-Optical Transport products, principally as a result of the MEN
Acquisition, and an $11.1 million increase of revenue from our Carrier
Ethernet Service Delivery products, partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease in
Packet-Optical Switching revenue. |
37
|
|
|
Services revenue increased primarily due to the addition of $34.2 million in
maintenance support revenue and $10.7 million in installation and deployment services from
the MEN Business. Services revenue also benefited from a $6.1 million increase in
maintenance support revenue from Cienas pre-acquisition portfolio. |
|
|
|
United States revenue increased due to a $77.7 million increase in sales of
Packet-Optical Transport products, principally as a result of the MEN
Acquisition, a $31.6 million increase in services revenue, an $8.9
million increase in Packet-Optical Switching revenue, and a $7.2 million increase in
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery revenue. |
|
|
|
International revenue increased primarily due to an $86.4 million increase in
Packet-Optical Transport revenue, principally as a result of the MEN
Acquisition, a $20.9 increase in services revenue and a $4.0 million
increase in Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery revenue. These increases were partially
offset by an $11.6 million decrease in revenue from Packet-Optical Switching products. |
Gross profit
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased due to lower product gross
margins described below, partially offset by improved service gross margin. |
|
|
|
Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenue decreased due to a
number of items relating to the MEN Acquisition that increased costs of goods sold. These
items include the revaluation of inventory described in Overview above and increased
amortization of intangible assets. The gross margin decline during the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 also reflects product mix, including an increased concentration of
Packet-Optical Transport revenue. |
|
|
|
Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue increased due to
higher concentration of maintenance support and professional services as a percentage of
revenue and improved operational efficiencies. |
Operating expense
Increased operating expense for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 principally reflects the
increased scale of our business resulting from the MEN Acquisition on March 19, 2010. The table
below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expense for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
44,442 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
$ |
100,869 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
$ |
56,427 |
|
|
|
127.0 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
31,468 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
52,127 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
20,659 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11,524 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
32,649 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
21,125 |
|
|
|
183.3 |
|
Acquisition and integration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
17,033 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
17,033 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
6,224 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
38,727 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
32,503 |
|
|
|
522.2 |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
3,941 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(1,784 |
) |
|
|
(45.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
$ |
97,599 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
$ |
243,562 |
|
|
|
62.5 |
|
|
$ |
145,963 |
|
|
|
149.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
|
|
|
Research and development expense was adversely affected by $4.8 million in foreign
exchange rates, primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the
Canadian dollar. The resulting $56.4 million change primarily reflects increases of $26.7
million in employee compensation and related costs, $12.4 million in professional services
and fees, $5.5 million in depreciation expense, $5.3 million in facilities and information
systems expense and $4.2 million in prototype expense related
to product development
initiatives. |
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expense benefited by $0.9 million in foreign exchange
rates primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro. The
resulting $20.7 million change primarily reflects increases of $15.3 million in employee
compensation and related costs, $2.1 million in travel-related expenditures, and $1.0
million in facilities and information systems expenses. |
|
|
|
General and administrative expense increased by $21.1 million, reflecting
increases of $8.8 million in consulting service expense, $5.3 million in facilities and
information systems expenses, and $5.2 million in employee compensation and related costs. |
|
|
|
Acquisition and integration costs associated with the MEN Acquisition reflect
consulting and third party service fees, which were expensed in the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations. |
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets increased due to the acquisition of
additional intangible assets as a result of the
MEN Acquisition. See Note 3 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of
Part I of this report. |
38
|
|
|
Restructuring costs for fiscal 2010 reflect the headcount reductions during the
second and third quarters of fiscal 2010 described in the Overview Restructuring
Activities above. |
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
%* |
|
2010 |
|
%* |
|
(decrease) |
|
%** |
Interest and other income (loss), net |
|
$ |
999 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
(2,668 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,667 |
) |
|
|
(367.1 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1,856 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
5,990 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,134 |
|
|
|
222.7 |
|
Loss on cost method investments |
|
$ |
2,193 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,193 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,644 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,174 |
|
|
|
249.8 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
|
|
|
Interest and other income (loss), net decreased as a result of a $4.1 million
non-cash loss related to the fair value of the redemption feature associated with our 4.0%
Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015. See Notes 8 and 16 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report for more
information regarding the issuance of these convertible notes and the fair value of the
redemption feature contained therein. Interest and other income (loss), net also decreased
by $0.7 million due to lower interest rates and invested balances, partially offset by a
$1.2 million increase related to foreign currency re-measurement gains. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense increased due to our private placement of $375.0 million in
aggregate principal amount of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015. See Note 16
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this
report. |
|
|
|
|
Loss on cost method investments for fiscal 2009 was primarily due to a decline
in value of our investment in a privately held technology company that was determined to be
other-than-temporary. |
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes increased primarily due to a decrease in refundable
federal tax credits. |
Nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2010
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost
of goods sold and gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
398,469 |
|
|
|
83.6 |
|
|
$ |
667,852 |
|
|
|
81.5 |
|
|
$ |
269,383 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
Services |
|
|
77,890 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
151,170 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
73,280 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
476,359 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
819,022 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
342,663 |
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
214,628 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
396,449 |
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
181,821 |
|
|
|
84.7 |
|
Services |
|
|
54,503 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
93,462 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
38,959 |
|
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
269,131 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
489,911 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
|
|
|
220,780 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
207,228 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
$ |
329,111 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
$ |
121,883 |
|
|
|
58.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product
revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit for the periods indicated:
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
398,469 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
667,852 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
269,383 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
Product cost of goods sold |
|
|
214,628 |
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
396,449 |
|
|
|
59.4 |
|
|
|
181,821 |
|
|
|
84.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product gross profit |
|
$ |
183,841 |
|
|
|
46.1 |
|
|
$ |
271,403 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
$ |
87,562 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of product revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in services
revenue, services cost of goods sold and services gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Services revenue |
|
$ |
77,890 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
151,170 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
73,280 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
|
Services cost of goods sold |
|
|
54,503 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
93,462 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
38,959 |
|
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services gross profit |
|
$ |
23,387 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
$ |
57,708 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
$ |
34,321 |
|
|
|
146.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of services revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
Revenue from sales to customers based outside of the United States is reflected as
International in the geographic distribution of revenue below. The table below (in thousands,
except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenue for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
United States |
|
$ |
294,688 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
$ |
534,174 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
$ |
239,486 |
|
|
|
81.3 |
|
International |
|
|
181,671 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
284,848 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
103,177 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
476,359 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
819,022 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
342,663 |
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
Certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenue for the periods
indicated (in thousands, except percentage data) as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
Company A |
|
$ |
53,244 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Company C |
|
|
94,928 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
204,092 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
148,172 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
$ |
204,092 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Denotes revenue representing less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
Revenue
|
|
|
Product revenue increased due to a $201.6 million increase in sales of our
Packet-Optical Transport products, principally as a result of the MEN
Acquisition, and a $103.5 million increase in revenue from our Carrier
Ethernet Service Delivery products, partially offset by a $34.2 million decrease in
Packet-Optical Switching revenue. |
40
|
|
|
Services revenue increased primarily due to the addition of $47.8 million in
maintenance support revenue and $12.2 million in installation and deployment services from
the MEN Business. Services revenue also benefited from a $12.2 million increase in revenue
from Cienas pre-acquisition services portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
United States revenue increased primarily due to a $108.5 million increase in
sales of Packet-Optical Transport products, principally as a result of the MEN
Acquisition, a $97.6 million increase in sales of Carrier
Ethernet Service Delivery products, and a $48.6 million increase in services revenue. These
increases offset a $15.3 million decrease in Packet-Optical Switching revenue. |
|
|
|
|
International revenue increased primarily due to a
$93.1 million increase in
Packet-Optical Transport revenue, principally as a result of the MEN
Acquisition, a $24.7 million increase in services revenue and a $5.9
million increase in sales of Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products. These increases
offset an $18.9 million decrease in Packet-Optical Switching revenue. |
Gross profit
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased due to lower product gross
margins described below, partially offset by improved service gross margin. |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenue decreased due to a
number of items relating to the MEN Acquisition that increased costs of goods sold. These
items include the revaluation of inventory described in Overview above, excess purchase
commitment losses on Cienas pre-acquisition inventory relating to product rationalization
decisions, and increased amortization of intangible assets. Fiscal 2010 gross profit was
also adversely affected by a lower concentration of Packet-Optical Switching sales. These
additional costs were offset by lower warranty and excess and obsolete inventory charges as
compared to fiscal 2009. Gross margin for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 was
negatively affected by a $5.8 million charge related to two committed customer sales
contracts that resulted in a negative gross margin on the initial phases of the customers
deployment. |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue increased due to
higher concentration of maintenance support and professional services as a percentage of
revenue and improved operational efficiencies. |
Operating expense
Increased operating expense for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 principally reflects the
increased scale of our business resulting from the acquisition of the MEN Business on March 19,
2010. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating
expense for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
140,624 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
$ |
222,044 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
$ |
81,420 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
98,582 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
131,692 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
33,110 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
35,724 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
66,915 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
31,191 |
|
|
|
87.3 |
|
Acquisition and integration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
83,285 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
83,285 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
18,852 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
61,829 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
42,977 |
|
|
|
228.0 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(455,673 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
10,416 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(6,431 |
) |
|
|
(61.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
$ |
759,871 |
|
|
|
159.5 |
|
|
$ |
569,750 |
|
|
|
69.6 |
|
|
$ |
(190,121 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
|
|
|
Research and development expense was adversely affected by $11.3 million in foreign
exchange rates, primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the
Canadian dollar. The resulting $81.4 million change primarily reflects increases of $38.8
million in employee compensation and related costs, $17.7 million in professional services
and fees, $8.5 million in facilities and information systems, $6.6 million in prototype
expense related to the development initiatives described above, and $6.9 million in
depreciation expense. |
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expense benefited by $1.5 million in foreign exchange
rates primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro. The
resulting $33.1 million change primarily reflects increases of $25.8 million in employee
compensation and related costs, $3.6 million in travel-related expenditures and $1.3
million in facilities and information systems. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative increased by $13.6 million in consulting service
expense, $7.6 million in employee compensation and related costs, and $7.1 million in
facilities and information systems expense. |
41
|
|
|
Acquisition and integration costs are related to the MEN Acquisition. As of
July 31, 2010, we have incurred $83.3 million in transaction, consulting and third party
service fees. |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets increased due to the acquisition of
additional intangible assets as a result of the MEN Acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment costs reflect the impairment of goodwill and resulting
charge incurred in fiscal 2009 as described in Note 4 to our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs for fiscal 2010 primarily reflect the headcount reductions
taken during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2010 described in the Overview
Restructuring Activities above. |
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
%* |
|
2010 |
|
%* |
|
(decrease) |
|
%** |
Interest and other income (loss), net |
|
$ |
9,167 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8,860 |
) |
|
|
(96.7 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
5,552 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
11,931 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
6,379 |
|
|
|
114.9 |
|
Loss on cost method investments |
|
$ |
5,328 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5,328 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
934 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
795 |
|
|
|
571.9 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
|
|
|
Interest and other income (loss), net decreased as a result of an $8.9 million
decrease in interest income due to lower interest rates and lower invested balances.
Decreased interest and other income, net also reflects a $2.0 million charge relating to
the termination of an indemnification asset upon the expiration of the statute of
limitations applicable to one of the uncertain tax contingencies acquired as part of the
MEN Acquisition. These items were partially offset by a $2.6 million non-cash gain related
to the fair value of the redemption feature associated with our 4.0% Convertible Senior
Notes due March 15, 2015. See Notes 8 and 16 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report for more information regarding the
issuance of these convertible notes and the fair value of the redemption feature contained
therein. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense increased due our private placement of $375.0 million in
aggregate principal amount of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015. See Note 16
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this
report. |
|
|
|
|
Loss on cost method investments for fiscal 2009 was primarily due to a decline
in value of our investment in two privately held technology companies that was determined
to be other-than-temporary. |
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes increased primarily due to a decrease in
refundable federal tax credits. |
Results of Operating Segments
Upon the completion of the MEN Acquisition, we reorganized our internal organizational
structure and the management of our business into the following operating segments: Packet-Optical
Transport; Packet-Optical Switching; Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery; and Software and Services.
See Note 20 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this
report. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our
operating segment revenue, including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in
reportable segments, for the periods indicated:
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packet Optical Transport |
|
$ |
78,048 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
$ |
242,057 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
$ |
164,009 |
|
|
|
210.1 |
|
Packet Optical Switching |
|
|
37,503 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
(2,697 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery |
|
|
22,677 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
33,802 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
11,125 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
Software and Services |
|
|
26,530 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
79,010 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
52,480 |
|
|
|
197.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue |
|
$ |
164,758 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
389,675 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
224,917 |
|
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Transport revenue for fiscal 2010 reflects the addition of
$171.5 million in revenue from the MEN Business and a decrease of $7.5 million related to
Cienas pre-acquisition portfolio. The addition of MEN Business revenue reflects $72.6
million of OME 6500, $68.3 million of OM 5200, $11.1 million of CPL, $8.0 million of OME
3500, $4.4 million of OME 6110 and $7.1 million of legacy transport products. These
increases offset a $4.0 million decrease in CoreStream revenue and a $3.5 million decrease
in Cienas pre-acquisition legacy transport products. |
|
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Switching revenue decreased reflecting a decline in
CoreDirector revenue. Sales of Packet-Optical Switching products reflect principally our
CoreDirector platform, which has a concentrated customer base.
As a result, revenue can fluctuate considerably depending upon individual
customer purchasing decisions. |
|
|
|
|
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery revenue increased reflecting
sales of switching and aggregation products in support of wireless backhaul deployments. |
|
|
|
|
Software and Services revenue increased primarily due to the addition of $34.2
million in maintenance support revenue and $10.7 million in installation and deployment
services from the MEN Business. Services revenue also benefited from a $6.1 million
increase in maintenance support revenue from Cienas pre-acquisition portfolio. |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating
segment revenue for the periods indicated, including the presentation of prior periods to reflect
the change in reportable segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packet Optical Transport |
|
$ |
221,684 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
$ |
423,216 |
|
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
201,532 |
|
|
|
90.9 |
|
Packet Optical Switching |
|
|
124,841 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
90,638 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
(34,203 |
) |
|
|
(27.4 |
) |
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery |
|
|
45,561 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
149,047 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
103,486 |
|
|
|
227.1 |
|
Software and Services |
|
|
84,273 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
156,121 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
71,848 |
|
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue |
|
$ |
476,359 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
819,022 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
342,663 |
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 |
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Transport revenue for fiscal 2010 reflects the addition of
Packet-Optical Transport revenue from the MEN Business of $88.8 million related to our OME
6500, $82.4 million related to OM 5200, $12.2 million related to CPL and $10.2 million
related to OME 3500. In addition, revenue related to our CN4200 increased by $15.4 million.
These increases were offset by a $16.4 million decrease in revenue related to Corestream
reflecting, in part, the long life cycle of this platform and the ongoing platform
transition resulting from the MEN Acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Switching revenue decreased reflecting a decline in CoreDirector
revenue. Sales of Packet-Optical Switching products reflect principally our CoreDirector
platform, which has a concentrated customer base. As a
result, revenue can fluctuate considerably depending upon individual customer purchasing
decisions. In addition, we anticipate sales of CoreDirector will fluctuate, in part
reflecting the technology transition from this product toward our 5430 Family of
Reconfigurable Switching Solutions. |
|
|
|
|
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery revenue increased significantly, reflecting
sales of switching and aggregation products in support of wireless backhaul deployments. |
43
|
|
|
Software and Services revenue increased primarily due to the addition of $47.8
million in maintenance support revenue and $12.2 million in installation and deployment
services from the MEN Business. Services revenue also benefited from
a $12.2 million
increase in Cienas pre-acquisition services portfolio. |
Segment Profit (Loss)
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our segment
profit (loss), including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable
segments, for the respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
(decrease) |
|
%* |
Segment profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Transport |
|
$ |
12,807 |
|
|
$ |
12,874 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Packet-Optical Switching |
|
|
10,443 |
|
|
|
10,320 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery |
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
(3,212 |
) |
|
|
(5,787 |
) |
|
|
(224.7 |
) |
Software and Services |
|
|
4,398 |
|
|
|
23,158 |
|
|
|
18,760 |
|
|
|
426.6 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Transport segment profit was relatively flat on higher sales
volume as a result of lower product gross margin and higher research and development costs
due to the MEN Acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Switching segment profit was relatively flat due to lower sales
volume and increased research and development costs. |
|
|
|
|
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery segment profit decreased due to increased
research and development costs partially offset by higher sales volume and improved gross
margin. |
|
|
|
|
Software and Services segment profit increased due to increased sales volume
and improved gross margin, partially offset by increased research and development costs. |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our segment
profit (loss), including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable
segments, for the respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
(decrease) |
|
%* |
Segment profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Transport |
|
$ |
20,282 |
|
|
$ |
26,402 |
|
|
$ |
6,120 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
Packet-Optical Switching |
|
|
43,325 |
|
|
|
13,749 |
|
|
|
(29,576 |
) |
|
|
(68.3 |
) |
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery |
|
|
(12,323 |
) |
|
|
31,642 |
|
|
|
43,965 |
|
|
|
356.8 |
|
Software and Services |
|
|
15,320 |
|
|
|
35,274 |
|
|
|
19,954 |
|
|
|
130.2 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010 |
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Transport segment profit increased due to higher sales volume,
partially offset by higher research and development costs, in part due to the MEN
Acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
Packet-Optical Switching segment profit decreased due to lower sales volume and
increased research and development costs. |
|
|
|
|
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery segment loss decreased due to significantly
higher sales volume and improved gross margin, partially offset by increased research and
development costs. |
|
|
|
|
Software and Services segment profit increased due to higher sales volume and
improved gross margin, partially offset by increased research and development costs. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At July 31, 2010, our principal source of liquidity was cash and cash equivalents. The
following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents and investments (in thousands):
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
485,705 |
|
|
$ |
470,237 |
|
|
$ |
(15,468 |
) |
Short-term investments |
|
|
563,183 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(562,999 |
) |
Long-term investments |
|
|
8,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
1,056,919 |
|
|
$ |
470,421 |
|
|
$ |
(586,498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in total cash and cash equivalents and investments during the first nine months
of fiscal 2010 was primarily related to our payment of $693.2 million related to the purchase price
for the MEN Acquisition, partially offset by our receipt of $364.3 million in net proceeds from the
private placement of $375.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes
due March 15, 2015. We used $203.2 million in cash from operations during first nine months of
fiscal 2010, consisting of $114.2 million for changes in working capital and $89.0 million from net
losses (adjusted for non-cash charges). Cash used from operations includes $83.3 million of
acquisition and integration-related expense, of which $74.4 million was reflected in net losses
(adjusted for non-cash charges) and $8.9 million was reflected in changes in working capital. See
Notes 3 and 16 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of Part I of this
report for more information regarding the MEN Acquisition and our convertible notes offering.
Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash
equivalents and cash generated from operations will satisfy our working capital needs, capital
expenditures, and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operations through at
least the next 12 months. As expected, the investment in working capital for the first nine months
of fiscal 2010 reflects the increased scale of business as the result of the MEN Acquisition and
the lower net working capital transferred to Ciena at closing, which resulted in a purchase price
adjustment following the closing. We regularly evaluate our liquidity position and the anticipated
cash needs of the business to fund our operating plans as well as any capital raising opportunities
that may be available to us.
The following sections review the significant activities that had an impact on our cash during
the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
Operating Activities
The following tables set forth (in thousands) components of our cash generated from operating
activities during the period:
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
253,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
Our net loss during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 included the significant non-cash
items summarized in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures,
and amortization of leasehold improvements |
|
$ |
28,146 |
|
Share-based compensation costs |
|
|
26,451 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
82,476 |
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence |
|
|
10,749 |
|
Provision for warranty |
|
|
16,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total significant non-cash charges |
|
$ |
164,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
45
Accounts Receivable, Net
Excluding the addition of $7.2 million of accounts receivable recorded upon completion of the
MEN Acquisition, cash used by accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, during
the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was $134.8 million primarily due to higher sales volume. Our days sales outstanding (DSOs) increased from 68
days for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 to 86 days for the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
Our DSOs increased due to a larger proportion of sales occurring later in our third quarter of
fiscal 2010.
The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes to our accounts receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts, from the end of fiscal 2009 through the end of the third quarter
of fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
118,251 |
|
|
$ |
260,277 |
|
|
$ |
142,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
Excluding the addition of $114.1 million of inventory recorded upon completion of the MEN
Acquisition, cash consumed by inventory during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was $30.8
million due to increased inventory levels to support a higher sales volume. Our inventory turns
decreased from 3.2 turns during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 to 2.4 turns for the first
nine months of fiscal 2010.
During the first nine months of fiscal 2010, changes in inventory reflect a $10.7 million
reduction related to a non-cash provision for excess and obsolescence. The following table sets
forth (in thousands) changes to the components of our inventory from the end of fiscal 2009 through
the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
19,694 |
|
|
$ |
26,606 |
|
|
$ |
6,912 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
6,021 |
|
|
|
4,541 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
90,914 |
|
|
|
220,044 |
|
|
|
129,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross inventory |
|
|
112,088 |
|
|
|
252,671 |
|
|
|
140,583 |
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence |
|
|
(24,002 |
) |
|
|
(30,507 |
) |
|
|
(6,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
88,086 |
|
|
$ |
222,164 |
|
|
$ |
134,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations
Excluding the addition of $39.0 million of accounts payable, accruals and other obligations
upon completion of the MEN Acquisition, cash generated in operations related to accounts payable,
accruals and other obligations during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was $83.6 million.
During the first nine months of fiscal 2010, we had non-operating cash accounts payable
increases of $2.9 million related to equipment purchases. Changes in accrued liabilities reflect
non-cash provisions of $16.4 million related to warranties. The following table sets forth (in
thousands) changes in our accounts payable, accruals and other obligations from the end of fiscal
2009 through the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
53,104 |
|
|
$ |
118,972 |
|
|
$ |
65,868 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
103,349 |
|
|
|
178,427 |
|
|
|
75,078 |
|
Restructuring liabilities |
|
|
9,605 |
|
|
|
9,016 |
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
8,554 |
|
|
|
10,098 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations |
|
$ |
174,612 |
|
|
$ |
316,513 |
|
|
$ |
141,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Payable on Convertible Notes
Interest on our outstanding 0.25% convertible senior notes, due May 1, 2013, is payable on May
1 and November 1 of each year. We paid $0.4 million in interest on these convertible notes during
the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
Interest on our outstanding 4.0% convertible senior notes, due March 15, 2015, is payable on
March 15 and September 15 of each year. Our initial interest payment on these notes will be due on
September 15, 2010.
46
Interest on our outstanding 0.875% convertible senior notes, due June 15, 2017, is payable on
June 15 and December 15 of each year. We paid $4.3 million in interest on these convertible notes
during the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
The indentures governing our outstanding convertible notes do not contain any financial
covenants. The indentures provide for customary events of default, including payment defaults,
breaches of covenants, failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy,
insolvency and reorganization. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the principal
amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, may be declared immediately due and
payable. These amounts automatically become due and payable if an event of default relating to
certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization occurs. See Note 16 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of Part I of this report for more information
regarding our outstanding convertible notes.
The following table reflects (in thousands) the balance of interest payable and the change in
this balance from the end of fiscal 2009 through the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
$ |
2,045 |
|
|
$ |
6,370 |
|
|
$ |
4,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
Excluding the addition of $18.8 million of deferred revenue recorded upon completion of the
MEN Acquisition, deferred revenue decreased by $4.0 million during the first nine months of fiscal
2010. Product deferred revenue represents payments received in advance of shipment and payments
received in advance of our ability to recognize revenue. Services deferred revenue is related to
payment for service contracts that will be recognized over the contract term. The following table
reflects (in thousands) the balance of deferred revenue and the change in this balance from the end
of fiscal 2009 through the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Products |
|
$ |
11,998 |
|
|
$ |
15,132 |
|
|
$ |
3,134 |
|
Services |
|
|
63,935 |
|
|
|
75,645 |
|
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred revenue |
|
$ |
75,933 |
|
|
$ |
90,777 |
|
|
$ |
14,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
During the first nine months of fiscal 2010, we had net sales and maturities of approximately
$633.5 million of available for sale securities. Investing activities also include our payment of
the $693.2 million purchase price related to the MEN Acquisition. Investing activities also
included the purchase of $63.6 million in marketable debt securities and the payment of
approximately $34.6 million in equipment purchases. We also purchased an additional $4.4 million of
equipment that was included in accounts payable. Purchases of equipment in accounts payable
increased by $2.9 million from the end of fiscal 2009.
Financing Activities
On March 15, 2010, we completed a private placement of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March
15, 2015 in aggregate principal amount of $375.0 million. The net proceeds from this offering were
$364.3 million. See Note 16.
Contractual Obligations
Significant changes to contractual obligations during the first nine months of fiscal 2010
relate to purchase obligations and operating leases, principally for additional facilities,
associated with the MEN Acquisition. Changes to interest and principal due on convertible notes
relate to our private placement, during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, of 4.0% Convertible
Senior Notes due March 15, 2015 in aggregate principal amount of $375.0 million. The following is a
summary of our future minimum payments under contractual obligations as of July 31, 2010 (in
thousands):
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one |
|
|
One to three |
|
|
Three to five |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Interest due on convertible notes |
|
$ |
107,860 |
|
|
$ |
20,120 |
|
|
$ |
40,240 |
|
|
$ |
38,750 |
|
|
$ |
8,750 |
|
Principal due at maturity on convertible notes |
|
|
1,173,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,000 |
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Operating leases (1) |
|
|
102,128 |
|
|
|
23,497 |
|
|
|
33,691 |
|
|
|
19,797 |
|
|
|
25,143 |
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
244,142 |
|
|
|
244,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition service obligations (3) |
|
|
23,492 |
|
|
|
23,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (4) |
|
$ |
1,650,622 |
|
|
$ |
311,251 |
|
|
$ |
371,931 |
|
|
$ |
433,547 |
|
|
$ |
533,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount for operating leases above does not include insurance, taxes, maintenance and
other costs required by the applicable operating lease. These costs are variable and are not
expected to have a material impact. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase obligations relate to purchase order commitments to our contract manufacturers and
component suppliers for inventory. In certain instances, we are permitted to cancel, reschedule or
adjust these orders. Consequently, only a portion of the amount reported above relates to firm,
non-cancelable and unconditional obligations. |
|
(3) |
|
Transition service obligations represent the non-cancelable portion of fees under the
transition service agreement. See Overview Integration
Activities and Costs. |
|
(4) |
|
As of July 31, 2010, we also had approximately $7.1 million of other long-term obligations in
our condensed consolidated balance sheet for unrecognized tax positions that are not included in
this table because the periods of cash settlement with the respective tax authority cannot be
reasonably estimated. |
Some of our commercial commitments, including some of the future minimum payments set
forth above, are secured by standby letters of credit. The following is a summary of our commercial
commitments secured by standby letters of credit by commitment expiration date as of July 31, 2010
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one |
|
|
One to three |
|
|
Three to five |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
39,860 |
|
|
$ |
35,261 |
|
|
$ |
3,895 |
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In particular, we do not
have any equity interests in so-called limited purpose entities, which include special purpose
entities (SPEs) and structured finance entities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. By their nature, these estimates and judgments are
subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On an ongoing basis, we reevaluate our estimates,
including those related to bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, goodwill, income
taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, derivatives and hedging, and contingencies and
litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Among other things, these estimates form the
basis for judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions. To the extent that there are material differences between our estimates
and actual results, our consolidated financial statements will be affected.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect those areas where
significant judgments and estimates are used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue to be
realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price to the
buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Customer purchase
agreements and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an
arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify
delivery. We assess whether the price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms
associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. We
assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by
credit checks and analysis, as well as the customers payment history. Revenue for maintenance
services is generally deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are
to be performed.
48
We apply the percentage of completion method to long term arrangements where we are required
to undertake significant production customizations or modification engineering, and reasonable and
reliable estimates of revenue and cost are available. Utilizing the percentage of completion
method, we recognize revenue based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to date to total estimated
costs expected to be incurred. In instances that do not meet the percentage of completion method
criteria, and recognition of revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding
customer acceptance. If circumstances arise that change the original estimates of revenue, costs,
or extent of progress toward completion, revisions to the estimates are made. These revisions may
result in increases or decreases in estimated revenue or costs, and such revisions are reflected in
income in the period in which the circumstances that gave rise to the revision become known by
management.
Some of our communications networking equipment is integrated with software that is essential
to the functionality of the equipment. Software revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of
an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility
is probable. In instances where final acceptance of the product is specified by the customer,
revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
Arrangements with customers may include multiple deliverables, including any combination of
equipment, services and software. If multiple element arrangements include software or
software-related elements that are essential to the equipment, we allocate the arrangement fee to
those separate units of accounting. Multiple element arrangements that include software are
separated into more than one unit of accounting if the functionality of the delivered element(s) is
not dependent on the undelivered element(s), there is vendor-specific objective evidence of the
fair value of the undelivered element(s), and general revenue recognition criteria related to the
delivered element(s) have been met. The amount of product and services revenue recognized is
affected by our judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so,
whether vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists. Changes to the elements in an
arrangement and our ability to establish vendor-specific objective evidence for those elements
could affect the timing of revenue recognition. For all other deliverables, we separate the
elements into more than one unit of accounting if the delivered element(s) have value to the
customer on a stand-alone basis, objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for the
undelivered element(s), and delivery of the undelivered element(s) is probable and substantially
within our control. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative fair
value of each accounting unit or using the residual method if objective evidence of fair value does
not exist for the delivered element(s). The revenue recognition criteria described above are
applied to each separate unit of accounting. If these criteria are not met, revenue is deferred
until the criteria are met or the last element has been delivered.
Our total deferred revenue for products was $12.0 million and $15.1 million as of October 31,
2009 and July 31, 2010, respectively. Our services revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over
the period during which the services are to be performed. Our total deferred revenue for services
was $63.9 million and $75.7 million as of October 31, 2009 and July 31, 2010, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation
We measure and recognize compensation expense for share-based awards based on estimated fair
values on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of each option-based award on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This option pricing model requires that we make
several estimates, including the options expected life and the price volatility of the underlying
stock. The expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock
options are expected to remain outstanding. Because we considered our options to be plain
vanilla, we calculated the expected term using the simplified method for fiscal 2007. Options are
considered to be plain vanilla if they have the following basic characteristics: they are
granted at-the-money; exercisability is conditioned upon service through the vesting date;
termination of service prior to vesting results in forfeiture; there is a limited exercise period
following termination of service; and the options are non-transferable and non-hedgeable. Beginning
in fiscal 2008 we gathered more detailed historical information about specific exercise behavior of
our grantees, which we used to determine expected term. We considered the implied volatility and
historical volatility of our stock price in determining our expected volatility, and, finding both
to be equally reliable, determined that a combination of both measures would result in the best
estimate of expected volatility. We recognize the estimated fair value of option-based awards, net
of estimated forfeitures, as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period.
We estimate the fair value of our restricted stock unit awards based on the fair value of our
common stock on the date of grant. Our outstanding restricted stock unit awards are subject to
service-based vesting conditions and/or performance-based vesting conditions. We recognize the
estimated fair value of service-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense
ratably over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. Awards with performance-based vesting
conditions require the achievement of certain financial or other performance criteria or targets as
a condition to the vesting, or acceleration of vesting. We recognize the estimated fair value of
performance-based awards,
49
net of
estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense over the performance period, using graded vesting, which considers each
performance period or tranche separately, based upon our determination of whether it is probable
that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period, we reassess the
probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those
targets. Determining whether the performance targets will be achieved involves judgment, and the
estimate of expense may be revised periodically based on changes in the probability of achieving
the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If
any performance goals are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized against that goal,
and, to the extent previously recognized, compensation cost is reversed.
Because share-based compensation expense is based on awards that are ultimately expected to
vest, the amount of expense takes into account estimated forfeitures. We estimate forfeitures at
the time of grant and revise, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from
those estimates. Changes in these estimates and assumptions can materially affect the measure of
estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. See Note 18 to our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report for information regarding our assumptions
related to share-based compensation and the amount of share-based compensation expense we incurred
for the periods covered in this report. As of July 31, 2010, total unrecognized compensation
expense was: (i) $7.0 million, which relates to unvested stock options and is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.9 years; and (ii) $65.4 million, which relates to
unvested restricted stock units and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.6 years.
We recognize windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options or release of
restricted stock units directly to stockholders equity only when realized. A windfall tax benefit
occurs when the actual tax benefit realized by us upon an employees disposition of a share-based
award exceeds the deferred tax asset, if any, associated with the award that we had recorded. When
assessing whether a tax benefit relating to share-based compensation has been realized, we follow
the tax law with-and-without method. Under the with-and-without method, the windfall is
considered realized and recognized for financial statement purposes only when an incremental
benefit is provided after considering all other tax benefits including our net operating losses.
The with-and-without method results in the windfall from share-based compensation awards always
being effectively the last tax benefit to be considered. Consequently, the windfall attributable to
share-based compensation will not be considered realized in instances where our net operating loss
carryover (that is unrelated to windfalls) is sufficient to offset the current years taxable
income before considering the effects of current-year windfalls.
Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence
We make estimates about future customer demand for our products when establishing the
appropriate reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. We write down inventory that has become
obsolete or unmarketable by an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Inventory
write downs are a component of our product cost of goods sold. Upon recognition of the write down,
a new lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and
circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. We
recorded charges for excess and obsolete inventory of $11.1 million and $10.7 million in the first
nine months of fiscal 2009 and 2010, respectively. During fiscal 2009, these charges were primarily
related to excess inventory due to a change in forecasted product sales. For the first nine months
of fiscal 2010, these charges were primarily related to excess and obsolete inventory charges
relating to product rationalization decisions in connection with the MEN Acquisition. In an effort
to limit our exposure to delivery delays and to satisfy customer needs we purchase inventory based
on forecasted sales across our product lines. In addition, part of our research and development
strategy is to promote the convergence of similar features and functionalities across our product
lines. Each of these practices exposes us to the risk that our customers will not order products
for which we have forecasted sales, or will purchase less than we have forecasted. Historically, we
have experienced write downs due to changes in strategic direction, discontinuance of a product and
declines in market conditions. If actual market conditions worsen or differ from those we have
assumed, if there is a sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products, or if there is a
higher incidence of inventory obsolescence due to a rapid change in technology, we may be required
to take additional inventory write-downs, and our gross margin could be adversely affected. Our
inventory net of allowance for excess and obsolescence was $88.1 million and $222.2 million as of
October 31, 2009 and July 31, 2010, respectively.
Restructuring
As part of our restructuring costs, we provide for the estimated cost of the net lease expense
for facilities that are no longer being used. The provision is equal to the fair value of the
minimum future lease payments under our contracted lease obligations, offset by the fair value of
the estimated sublease payments that we may receive. As of July 31, 2010, our accrued restructuring
liability related to net lease expense and other related charges was $7.3 million. The total
minimum remaining lease payments for these restructured facilities are $11.9 million. These lease
payments will be made over the remaining lives of our leases, which range from nine months to nine
years. If actual market conditions are different than those we have projected, we will be required
to recognize additional restructuring costs or benefits associated with these facilities.
50
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
Our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on managements assessment, on a
specific identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. We perform ongoing
credit evaluations of our customers and generally have not required collateral or other forms of
security from customers. In determining the appropriate balance for our allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable, management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to
determine collectibility. In doing so, we consider creditworthiness, payment history, account
activity and communication with such customer. If a customers financial condition changes, or if
actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, we may be required to take a charge for
an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable which could have an adverse impact on our results of
operations. Our accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts was $118.3 million and
$260.3 million as of October 31, 2009 and July 31, 2010, respectively. Our allowance for doubtful
accounts as of October 31, 2009 and July 31, 2010 was $0.1 million.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over amounts assigned to tangible or
identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed from our acquisitions. We test
goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which we have determined to be the last business day
of fiscal September each year. We also test goodwill for impairment between annual tests if an
event occurs or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of
the reporting unit below its carrying value. The first step is to compare the fair value of the
reporting unit with the units carrying amount, including goodwill. If this test indicates that
the fair value is less than the carrying value, then step two is required to compare the implied
fair value of the reporting units goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting units
goodwill. A non-cash goodwill impairment charge would have the effect of decreasing our earnings
or increasing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial impairment
charge, our operating results would be materially adversely affected in such period. At July 31,
2010, we had $38.1 million in goodwill, assigned to our Packet-Optical Transport reporting unit.
All of the goodwill on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 31, 2010 is a result of
the acquisition of the MEN Business. See Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
in Item 1 of Part I of this report for information relating to our interim impairment assessment
during fiscal 2009.
Long-lived Assets
Our long-lived assets include: equipment, furniture and fixtures; finite-lived intangible
assets; indefinite-lived intangible assets; and maintenance spares. As of October 31, 2009 and July
31, 2010 these assets totaled $154.7 million and $642.6 million, net, respectively. We test
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
assets carrying amount is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows. Our long-lived assets
are assigned to our reporting units which represents the lowest level for which we identify cash
flows.
Derivatives
Our 4.0% convertible senior notes include a redemption feature that is accounted for as a
separate embedded derivative. The embedded redemption feature is bifurcated from these notes using
the with-and-without approach. As such, the total value of the embedded redemption feature is
calculated as the difference between the value of these notes (the Hybrid Instrument) and the
value of an identical instrument without the embedded redemption feature (the Host Instrument).
Both the Host Instrument and the Hybrid Instrument are valued using a modified binomial model. The
modified binomial model utilizes a risk free interest rate, an implied volatility of Cienas
stock, the recovery rates of bonds, and the implied default intensity of the 4.0% convertible
senior notes. The embedded redemption feature is recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and
these changes are included in interest and other income (expense), net on the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
As of July 31, 2010, we have recorded a valuation allowance offsetting essentially all our net
deferred tax assets of $1.3 billion. When measuring the need for a valuation allowance, we assess
both positive and negative evidence regarding the realizability of these deferred tax assets. We
record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. In determining net deferred tax assets and valuation allowances,
management is required to make judgments and estimates related to projections of profitability, the
timing and extent of the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, applicable tax rates,
transfer pricing methodologies
51
and tax
planning strategies. The valuation allowance is reviewed quarterly and is maintained until sufficient positive evidence exists to
support a reversal. Because evidence such as our operating results during the most recent
three-year period is afforded more weight than forecasted results for future periods, our
cumulative loss during this three-year period represents sufficient negative evidence regarding the
need for nearly a full valuation allowance. We will release this valuation allowance when
management determines that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be
realized. Any future release of valuation allowance may be recorded as a tax benefit increasing net
income or as an adjustment to paid-in capital, based on tax ordering requirements.
Warranty
Our liability for product warranties, included in other accrued liabilities, was $40.2 million
and $64.5 million as of October 31, 2009 and July 31, 2010, respectively. Our products are
generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from one to five years. We accrue for warranty
costs as part of our cost of goods sold based on associated material costs, technical support labor
costs, and associated overhead. Material cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends
in the volume of product returns within the warranty period and the cost to repair or replace the
equipment. Technical support labor cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends and the
cost to support the customer cases within the warranty period. The provision for product warranties
was $13.6 million and $16.4 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and 2010,
respectively. The provision for warranty claims may fluctuate on a quarterly basis depending upon
the mix of products and customers in that period. If actual product failure rates, material
replacement costs, service or labor costs differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated
warranty provision would be required. An increase in warranty claims or the related costs
associated with satisfying these warranty obligations could increase our cost of sales and
negatively affect our gross margin.
Uncertain Tax Positions
We account for uncertainty in income tax positions using a two-step approach. The first step
is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence
indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the
tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement.
Significant judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our
provision for income taxes. Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be
given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is
reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. We adjust these reserves in light
of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an
estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts
recorded, such differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such
determination is made. As of July 31, 2010, we had $1.3 million and $7.1 million recorded as
current and long-term obligations, respectively, related to uncertain tax positions. The provision
for income taxes includes the effect of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are
considered appropriate, as well as the related net interest.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits increased by $1.0 million during the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 to $8.4 million, which includes $1.4 million of interest and some minor
penalties. On March 19, 2010, as a result of the acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena recorded a
liability and an indemnification asset of $2.6 million related to the uncertain income tax
positions of the MEN Business. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, subsequent to the
acquisition, this acquired liability and associated indemnification asset were reduced by $2.0
million due to a lapse in applicable statute of limitations.
Loss Contingencies
We are subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of
business. These may relate to disputes, litigation and other legal actions. We consider the
likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate
the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. A loss is accrued when it is probable that a
liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly
evaluate current information available to us to determine whether any accruals should be adjusted
and whether new accruals are required.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking
statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency
exchange rates.
52
Interest Rate Sensitivity. As of July 31, 2010 we no longer hold any marketable debt
securities which would be subject to interest rate sensitivity. See Notes 7 and 8 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report for information relating to
these investments and their fair value. Accordingly, if market interest rates were to increase
immediately and uniformly by 10 percentage points from current levels, the fair value of the
portfolio would not be affected.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. As a global concern, we face exposure to adverse movements in
foreign currency exchange rates. Historically, our sales have primarily been denominated in U.S.
dollars and the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on revenue has not been material. As a
result of our increased global presence from the MEN Acquisition, we expect that a larger
percentage of our revenue will be non-U.S. dollar denominated, with increased sales denominated in
Canadian Dollars and Euros. As a result, if the U.S. dollar strengthens against these currencies,
our revenues could be adversely affected in our non-U.S. dollar denominated sales. For our U.S.
dollar denominated sales, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar would increase the real cost
to our customers of our products in markets outside the United States.
With regard to operating expense, our primary exposures to foreign currency exchange risk are
related to non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense in Canadian Dollars, British Pounds, Euros
and Indian Rupees. During the first nine months of fiscal 2010, approximately 69.2% of our
operating expense was U.S. dollar denominated.
To reduce variability in non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense, we have previously
entered into foreign currency forward contracts and may do so in the future. We utilize these
derivatives to partially offset our market exposure to fluctuations in certain foreign currencies.
In the past, these derivatives have been designated as cash flow hedges and were fully matured as
of October 31, 2009. We do not enter into foreign exchange forward or option contracts for trading
purposes.
For the nine months of fiscal 2010, research and development, and general and administrative
expenses, were negatively affected by approximately $11.3 million, $0.2 million respectively, due
to unfavorable foreign exchange rates related to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to
the Canadian Dollar, partially offset by favorable foreign exchange rates related to the
strengthening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro. Sales and marketing benefited by $1.5
million due to favorable foreign exchange rates related to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar in
relation to the Euro.
As of July 31, 2010, our assets and liabilities related to non-dollar denominated currencies
were primarily related to intercompany payables and receivables.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon
this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
As described elsewhere in this report, we acquired the MEN Business on March 19, 2010. We are in the process of integrating the MEN Business and we currently rely on services provided through an affiliate of Nortel under a transition services agreement
to support, among other purposes, the control activities of the MEN Business. Such services commenced during our second fiscal
quarter and initially impacted our internal controls over financial reporting during that period. We have not fully evaluated the
internal control over financial reporting of the MEN Business and, as permitted by SEC rules and regulations, will exclude the
MEN Business from our evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting from our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for fiscal 2010. The process of integrating the MEN Business into our evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting may result in future changes to our internal control over financial reporting. The MEN Business will be part of our
evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year
ending October 31, 2011, in which report we will be initially required to include the MEN Business in our annual assessment.
53
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On May 29, 2008, Graywire, LLC filed a complaint in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Georgia against Ciena and four other defendants, alleging, among other
things, that certain of the parties products infringe U.S. Patent 6,542,673 (the 673 Patent), relating to an identifier system and components for
optical assemblies. The complaint, which seeks injunctive relief and damages, was served upon Ciena
on January 20, 2009. Ciena filed an answer to the complaint and counterclaims against Graywire on
March 26, 2009, and an amended answer and counterclaims on April 17, 2009. On April 27, 2009, Ciena
and certain other defendants filed an application for inter partes reexamination of the 673 Patent
with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO). On the same date, Ciena and the other
defendants filed a motion to stay the case pending reexamination of all of the patents-in-suit. On
July 17, 2009, the district court granted the defendants motion to stay the case. On July 23,
2009, the PTO granted the defendants application for reexamination with respect to certain claims
of the 673 Patent. We believe that we have valid defenses to the lawsuit and intend to defend it
vigorously in the event the stay of the case is lifted.
As a result of our June 2002 merger with ONI Systems Corp., Ciena became a defendant in a
securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York in August 2001. The complaint named ONI, certain former ONI officers, and certain
underwriters of ONIs initial public offering (IPO) as defendants, and alleges, among other things,
that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose alleged
compensation arrangements in ONIs registration statement and by engaging in manipulative practices
to artificially inflate ONIs stock price after the IPO. The complaint also alleges that ONI and
the named former officers violated the securities laws by failing to disclose the underwriters
alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. The former ONI officers have been
dismissed from the action without prejudice. Similar complaints have been filed against more than
300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998, and all of these actions have
been included in a single coordinated proceeding. On October 6, 2009, the Court entered an opinion
granting final approval to a settlement among the plaintiffs, issuer defendants and underwriter
defendants, and directing that the Clerk of the Court close these actions. Notices of appeal of the
opinion granting final approval have been filed. A description of this litigation and the history
of the proceedings can be found in Item 3. Legal Proceedings of Part I of Cienas Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2009. No specific
amount of damages has been claimed in this action. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation
and because the settlement remains subject to appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is
uncertain.
In addition to the matters described above, we are subject to various legal proceedings,
claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not expect that the
ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material effect on our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks relating to our Acquisition of the Nortel Metro Ethernet Networks (MEN) Business
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we completed our acquisition of the MEN Business.
Business combinations of the scale and complexity of this transaction involve a high degree of
risk. You should consider the following risk factors before investing in our securities.
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits and operating synergies expected from the MEN
Acquisition, which could adversely affect our operating results and the market price of our common
stock.
The success of the MEN Acquisition will depend, in significant part, on our ability to
successfully integrate the acquired business, grow the combined businesss revenue and realize the
anticipated strategic benefits and operating synergies from the combination. We believe that the
addition of the MEN Business will accelerate the execution of our corporate and product development
strategy, enable us to compete with larger equipment providers and provide opportunities to
optimize our product development investment. Achieving these goals requires growth of the revenue
of the MEN Business and realization of the targeted sales synergies from our combined customer
bases and solutions offerings. This growth and the anticipated benefits of the transaction may not
be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than we expect. Actual operating,
technological, strategic and sales synergies, if achieved at all, may be less significant than we
expect or may take longer to achieve than anticipated. If we are not able to achieve these
objectives and realize the anticipated benefits and operating synergies of the MEN Acquisition
within a reasonable time following the closing, our results of operations and the value of Cienas
common stock may be adversely affected.
54
The MEN Acquisition will result in significant integration costs and any material delays or
unanticipated additional expense may harm our business and results of operations.
The complexity and magnitude of the integration effort associated with the MEN Acquisition
will be significant and will require that Ciena fund significant capital and operating expense to
support the integration of the combined operations. We currently expect that integration expense
associated with equipment and information technology, transaction
expense, and consulting and third party service fees associated with integration, will be approximately
$180.0 million over a two-year period, with a significant portion of such costs anticipated to be
incurred during fiscal 2010. We have incurred and expect to continue
to incur additional costs as we build up internal resources,
including headcount, facilities and information systems, or engage third party providers, while we
simultaneously continue to rely upon and transition away from critical transition support services
provided by an affiliate of Nortel during a transition period. In addition to these transition
costs, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur increased expense relating to, among other things, restructuring and increased
amortization of intangibles and inventory obsolescence charges. Any material delays, difficulties
or unanticipated additional expense associated with integration activities may harm our business
and results of operations.
The integration of the MEN Business is a complex undertaking, involving a number of operational
risks, and disruptions or delays could significantly harm our business and results of operations.
Because of the structure of the MEN Acquisition as an asset carve out from Nortel, in a number
of areas we did not acquire back-office systems and processes that support the operation of the
business. The MEN Acquisition will therefore require that we build new organizations, grow Cienas
existing infrastructure, or retain third party services to ensure business continuity and to
support and scale our business. As noted below, we are currently relying upon an affiliate of
Nortel to provide critical business support services for a transition period and will ultimately
have to transfer these activities to internal or other third party resources. As a result,
integrating the operations of the MEN Business will be extremely complex and we could encounter
material disruptions, delays or unanticipated costs. Successful integration involves numerous
risks, including:
|
|
|
assimilating product offerings and sales and marketing operations; |
|
|
|
|
coordinating and implementing a combined research and development strategy; |
|
|
|
|
retaining and attracting customers following a period of significant uncertainty
associated with the acquired business; |
|
|
|
|
diversion of management attention from business and operational matters; |
|
|
|
|
identifying and retaining key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
maintaining and transitioning relationships with key vendors, including component
providers, manufacturers and service providers; |
|
|
|
|
integrating accounting, information technology, enterprise management and
administrative systems which may be difficult or costly; |
|
|
|
|
making significant cash expenditures that may be required to retain personnel or
eliminate unnecessary resources; |
|
|
|
|
managing tax costs or liabilities for acquired or acquiring corporate entities; |
|
|
|
|
coordinating a broader and more geographically dispersed organization; |
|
|
|
|
maintaining uniform standards, procedures and policies to ensure efficient and
compliant administration of the organization; and |
|
|
|
|
making any necessary modifications to internal control to comply with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules and regulations. |
Disruptions or delays associated with these and other risks encountered in the integration
process could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We are relying on an affiliate of Nortel for the performance of certain critical business support services during
a transition period following the closing of the MEN Acquisition and there can be no assurance that such services
will be performed timely and effectively.
We currently rely upon an affiliate of Nortel for certain key business support services
related to the operation and continuity of the MEN Business. These services will be transferred to
and taken over by our organization over time as we build up the capability and capability to do so.
These services include key finance and accounting functions, supply chain and logistics management,
maintenance and product support services, order management and fulfillment, trade compliance, and
information technology services. These transition services are costly and we could incur
approximately $94.0 million per year, if all of the transition services are used for a full year.
Relying upon the transition services provider to perform critical operations and services raises a
number of significant business and operational risks. The transition service provider also performs
services on behalf of other purchasers of the businesses that Nortel has recently divested. There
is no assurance the provider will serve as an effective support partner for all of the Nortel
purchasers and we face risks associated with the providers ability to retain experienced and
knowledgeable personnel as Ciena and other purchasers wind down support services. Cienas
administration and oversight of
55
these transition services is complex, requires significant
resources and presents issues related to the segregation of duties and information among the purchasers. In
particular, the wind down and transfer to Ciena or other third parties of these critical services
is a complex undertaking and may be disruptive to our business and operations. Significant
disruption in business support services, the transfer of these activities to Ciena or unanticipated
costs related to such services could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
The MEN Acquisition may expose us to significant unanticipated liabilities that could adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
Our purchase of the MEN Business may expose us to significant unanticipated liabilities
relating to the operation of the Nortel business. These liabilities could include employment,
retirement or severance-related obligations under applicable law or other benefits arrangements,
legal claims, warranty or similar liabilities to customers, and claims by or amounts owed to
vendors, including as a result of any contracts assigned to Ciena. We may also incur liabilities or
claims associated with our acquisition or licensing of Nortels technology and intellectual
property including claims of infringement. Particularly in international jurisdictions, our
acquisition of the MEN Business, or our decision to independently enter new international markets
where Nortel previously conducted business, could also expose us to tax liabilities and other
amounts owed by Nortel. The incurrence of such unforeseen or unanticipated liabilities, should they
be significant, could have a material adverse affect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
The MEN Acquisition may cause dilution to our earnings per share, which may harm the market price
of our common stock.
A number of factors, including lower than anticipated revenue and gross margin of the MEN
Business, or fewer operating synergies of the combined operations, could cause dilution to our
earnings per share or decrease or delay any accretive effect of the MEN Acquisition. We could also
encounter unanticipated or additional integration-related costs or fail to realize all of the
benefits of the MEN Acquisition that underlie our financial model and expectations for future
growth and profitability. These and other factors could cause dilution to our earnings per share or
decrease or delay the expected financial benefits of the MEN Acquisition and cause a decrease in
the price of our common stock.
The complexity of the integration and transition associated with the MEN Acquisition, together with
Cienas increased scale and global presence, may affect our internal control over financial
reporting and our ability to effectively and timely report our financial results.
We currently rely upon a combination of Ciena information systems and critical transition
services provided by an affiliate of Nortel to accurately and effectively compile and report our
financial results. The additional scale of our operations, together with the complexity of the
integration effort, including changes to or implementation of critical information technology
systems and reliance upon third party transition services, may adversely affect our ability to
report our financial results on a timely basis. In addition, we have had to train new employees and
third party providers, and assume operations in jurisdictions where we have not previously had
operations. We expect that the MEN Acquisition may necessitate significant modifications to our
internal control systems, processes and information systems, both on a transition basis, and over
the longer-term as we fully integrate the combined company. We cannot be certain that changes to
our design for internal control over financial reporting, or the controls utilized by other third
parties, will be sufficient to enable management or our independent registered public accounting
firm to determine that our internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis.
If we are unable to accurately and timely report our financial results, or are unable to assert
that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, our business and market
perception of our financial condition may be harmed and the trading price of our stock may be
adversely affected.
Risks related to our current business and operations
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other
information contained in this report, you should consider the following risk factors before
investing in our securities.
Our business and operating results could be adversely affected by unfavorable macroeconomic and
market conditions and reductions in the level of capital expenditure by our largest customers in
response to these conditions.
56
Broad macroeconomic weakness has previously resulted in sustained periods of decreased demand
for our products and services that have adversely affected our operating results. In response to
these conditions, many of our customers significantly reduced their network infrastructure
expenditures as they sought to conserve capital, reduce debt or address uncertainties or changes in
their own business models brought on by broader market challenges. We continue to experience
cautious spending among our customers as a result of the recent period of economic weakness and
remain uncertain as to how long these macroeconomic and industry conditions will continue, the pace of recovery, and the
magnitude of the effect of recent market conditions on our business and results of operations.
Continued or increased challenging economic and market conditions could result in:
|
|
|
difficulty forecasting, budgeting and planning due to limited visibility into the
spending plans of current or prospective customers; |
|
|
|
|
increased competition for fewer network projects and sales opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
increased pricing pressure that may adversely affect revenue and gross margin; |
|
|
|
|
higher overhead costs as a percentage of revenue; |
|
|
|
|
increased risk of charges relating to excess and obsolete inventories and the write
off of other intangible assets; and |
|
|
|
|
customer financial difficulty and increased difficulty in collecting accounts
receivable. |
Our business and operating results could be materially affected by periods of unfavorable
macroeconomic and market conditions, globally or specific to a particular region where we operate,
and any resulting reductions in the level of capital expenditure by our customers.
A small number of communications service providers account for a significant portion of our
revenue. The loss of any of these customers, or a significant reduction in their spending, would
have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
A significant portion of our revenue is concentrated among a relatively small number of
communications service providers. Eight customers accounted for greater than 60% of our revenue in
fiscal 2009, including AT&T, which represented approximately 19.6% of fiscal 2009 revenue.
Consequently, our financial results are closely correlated with the spending of a relatively small
number of service providers and are significantly affected by market or industry changes that
affect their businesses. The terms of our frame contracts generally do not obligate these customers
to purchase any minimum or specific amounts of equipment or services. Because their spending may be
unpredictable and sporadic, our revenue and operating results can fluctuate on a quarterly basis.
Reliance upon a relatively small number of customers increases our exposure to changes in their
network and purchasing strategies. Some of our customers are pursuing efforts to outsource the
management and operation of their networks, or have indicated a procurement strategy to reduce or
rationalize the number of vendors from which they purchase equipment. These strategies may present
challenges to our business and could benefit our larger competitors. Our concentration in revenue
has increased in recent years, in part, as a result of consolidations among a number of our largest
customers. Consolidations may increase the likelihood of temporary or indefinite reductions in
customer spending or changes in network strategy that could harm our business and operating
results. The loss of one or more large service provider customers, or a significant reduction in
their spending, as a result of the factors above or otherwise, would have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our revenue and operating results can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter.
Our revenue and results of operations can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter. Our
budgeted expense levels depend in part on our expectations of long-term future revenue and gross
margin, and substantial reductions in expense are difficult and can take time to implement.
Uncertainty or lack of visibility into customer spending, and changes in economic or market
conditions, can make it difficult to prepare reliable estimates of future revenue and corresponding
expense levels. Consequently, our level of operating expense or inventory may be high relative to
our revenue, which could harm our ability to achieve or maintain profitability. Given market
conditions and the effect of cautious spending in recent quarters, lower levels of backlog orders
and an increase in the percentage of quarterly revenue relating to orders placed in that quarter
could result in more variability and less predictability in our quarterly results.
Additional factors that contribute to fluctuations in our revenue and operating results
include:
|
|
|
broader economic and market conditions affecting us and our customers; |
|
|
|
|
changes in capital spending by large communications service providers; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and size of orders, including our ability to recognize revenue under
customer contracts; |
|
|
|
|
the transition from selling legacy to next-generation
technology platforms; |
|
|
|
|
variations in the mix between higher and lower margin products and services; and |
|
|
|
|
the level of pricing pressure we encounter, particularly for our Packet-Optical
Transport. |
57
Many factors affecting our results of operations are beyond our control, particularly in the
case of large service provider orders and multi-vendor or multi-technology network infrastructure
builds where the achievement of certain thresholds for acceptance is subject to the readiness and
performance of the customer or other providers, and changes in customer requirements or
installation plans. As a consequence, our results for a particular quarter may be difficult to
predict, and our prior results are not necessarily indicative of results likely in future periods.
The factors above may cause our revenue and operating results to fluctuate unpredictably from
quarter to quarter. These fluctuations may cause our operating results to be below the expectations
of securities analysts or investors, which may cause our stock price to decline.
We face intense competition that could hurt our sales and results of operations.
The markets in which we compete for sales of networking equipment, software and services are
extremely competitive. Competition is particularly intense in attracting large carrier customers
and securing new market opportunities with existing carrier customers. In an effort to secure new
or long-term customers and capture market share, in the past we have and in the future we may agree
to pricing or other terms that result in negative gross margins on a particular order or group of
orders. The level of competition and pricing pressure that we face increases substantially during
periods of macroeconomic weakness, constrained spending or fewer network projects. As a result of
recent market conditions, we have experienced significant competition and increased pricing
pressure, particularly for our Packet-Optical Transport products, as we and other vendors have
sought to retain or grow market share.
Competition in our markets, generally, is based on any one or a combination of the following
factors: price, product features, functionality and performance, introduction of innovative network
solutions, manufacturing capability and lead-times, incumbency and existing business relationships,
scalability and the flexibility of products to meet the immediate and future network requirements
of customers. A small number of very large companies have historically dominated our industry.
These competitors have substantially greater financial and marketing resources, greater
manufacturing capacity, broader product offerings and more established relationships with service
providers and other potential customers than we do. Because of their scale and resources, they may
be perceived to be better positioned to offer network operating or management service for large
carrier customers. We expect that the acquired products and technologies, increased market share
and global presence resulting from the MEN Acquisition will only intensify the level of competition
that we face, particularly from larger vendors. We also compete with a number of smaller companies
that provide significant competition for a specific product, application, customer segment or
geographic market. Due to the narrower focus of their efforts, these competitors may achieve
commercial availability of their products more quickly or may be more attractive to customers.
Increased competition in our markets has resulted in aggressive business tactics, including:
|
|
|
significant price competition, particularly for our Packet-Optical Transport
platforms; |
|
|
|
|
customer financing assistance; |
|
|
|
|
early announcements of competing products and extensive marketing efforts; |
|
|
|
|
competitors offering equity ownership positions to customers; |
|
|
|
|
competitors offering to repurchase our equipment from existing customers; |
|
|
|
|
marketing and advertising assistance; and |
|
|
|
|
intellectual property assertions and disputes. |
The tactics described above can be particularly effective in an increasingly concentrated
base of potential customers such as communications service providers. If competitive pressures
increase or we fail to compete successfully in our markets, our sales and profitability would
suffer.
Our reliance upon third party manufacturers exposes us to risks that could negatively affect our
business and operations.
We rely upon third party contract manufacturers to perform the majority of the manufacturing
of our products and components. We do not have contracts in place with some of our manufacturers,
do not have guaranteed supply of components or manufacturing capacity and in some cases are
utilizing temporary or transitional commercial arrangements intended to facilitate the integration
of the MEN Business. Our reliance upon third party manufacturers could expose us to increased risks
related to lead times, continued supply, on-time delivery, quality assurance and compliance with
environmental standards and other regulations. Reliance upon third parties manufacturers exposes us
to risks related to their operations, financial position, business continuity and continued
viability, which may be adversely affected by broader macroeconomic conditions and difficulties in
the credit markets. In an effort to drive cost reductions, we anticipate rationalizing our supply
chain and third party contract manufacturers as part of the integration of the MEN Business into
Cienas operations. There can be no assurance that these efforts, including any consolidation
or reallocation the third party sourcing and manufacturing, will not ultimately result in
additional costs or disruptions in our operations and business.
58
We may also experience difficulties as a result of geopolitical events, military actions or
health pandemics in the countries where our products or critical components are manufactured. Our
product manufacturing principally takes place in Mexico, Canada, Thailand and China. Thailand is
undergoing a period of instability and we have in the past experienced product shipment delays
associated with political turmoil in Thailand, including a blockade of its main international
airport. Significant disruptions in these countries affecting supply and manufacturing capacity, or
other difficulties with our contract manufacturers would negatively affect our business and results
of operations.
Investment of research and development resources in technologies for which there is not a matching
market opportunity, or failure to sufficiently or timely invest in technologies for which there is
market demand, would adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
The market for communications networking equipment is characterized by rapidly evolving
technologies and changes in market demand. We continually invest in research and development to
sustain or enhance our existing products and develop or acquire new products technologies. Our
current development efforts are focused upon the evolution of our CoreDirector Multiservice Optical
Switch family, the expansion of our Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery and aggregation products, and
40G and 100G coherent technologies and capabilities for our Packet-Optical Transport platforms.
There is often a lengthy period between commencing these development initiatives and bringing a new
or improved product to market. During this time, technology preferences, customer demand and the
market for our products may move in directions we had not anticipated. There is no guarantee that
new products or enhancements will achieve market acceptance or that the timing of market adoption
will be as predicted. There is a significant possibility, therefore, that some of our development
decisions, including significant expenditures on acquisitions, research and development costs, or
investments in technologies, will not turn out as anticipated, and that our investment in some
projects will be unprofitable. There is also a possibility that we may miss a market opportunity
because we failed to invest, or invested too late, in a technology, product or enhancement. Changes
in market demand or investment priorities may also cause us to discontinue existing or planned
development for new products or features, which can have a disruptive effect on our relationships
with customers. These product development risks can be compounded in the context of a significant
acquisition such as the MEN Business and decision making regarding our product portfolio and the
significant development work required to integrate the combined product and software offerings. If
we fail to make the right investments or fail to make them at the right time, our competitive
position may suffer and our revenue and profitability could be harmed.
Product performance problems could damage our business reputation and negatively affect our results
of operations.
The development and production of highly technical and complex communications network
equipment is complicated. Some of our products can be fully tested only when deployed in
communications networks or when carrying traffic with other equipment. As a result, product
performance problems are often more acute for initial deployments of new products and product
enhancements. Our products have contained and may contain undetected hardware or software errors or
defects. These defects have resulted in warranty claims and additional costs to remediate.
Unanticipated problems can relate to the design, manufacturing, installation or integration of our
products. Performance problems and product malfunctions can also relate to defects in components,
software or manufacturing services supplied by third parties. Product performance, reliability and
quality problems can negatively affect our business, including:
|
|
|
increased costs to remediate software or hardware defects or replace products; |
|
|
|
|
payment of liquidated damages or similar claims for performance failures or delays; |
|
|
|
|
increased inventory obsolescence; |
|
|
|
|
increased warranty expense or estimates resulting from higher failure rates,
additional field service obligations or other rework costs related to defects; |
|
|
|
|
delays in recognizing revenue or collecting accounts receivable; and |
|
|
|
|
declining sales to existing customers and order cancellations. |
Product performance problems could also damage our business reputation and harm our prospects with
potential customers. These consequences of product defects or quality problems, including any
significant costs to remediate, could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Network equipment sales to large communications service providers often involve lengthy sales
cycles and protracted contract negotiations and may require us to assume terms or conditions that
negatively affect our pricing, payment terms and the timing of revenue recognition.
59
Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to maintain and expand our sales
to large communications service providers. These sales typically involve lengthy sales cycles,
protracted and sometimes difficult contract negotiations, and sales to service providers often
involve extensive product testing and network certification, including network-specific or
region-specific processes. We are sometimes required to agree to contract terms or conditions that
negatively affect pricing, payment terms and the timing of revenue recognition in order to
consummate a sale. During periods of macroeconomic or market weakness, these customers may request
extended payment terms, vendor or third-party financing and other alternative purchase structures.
These terms may, in turn, negatively affect our revenue and results of operations and increase our
risk and susceptibility to quarterly fluctuations in our results. Service providers may ultimately
insist upon terms and conditions that we deem too onerous or not in our best interest. Moreover,
our purchase agreements generally do not require that a customer guarantee any minimum purchase
level and customers often have the right to modify, delay, reduce or cancel previous orders. As a
result, we may incur substantial expense and devote time and resources to potential relationships
that never materialize or result in lower than anticipated sales.
Difficulties with third party component suppliers, including sole and limited source suppliers,
could increase our costs and harm our business and customer relationships.
We depend on third party suppliers for our product components and subsystems, as well as for
equipment used to manufacture and test our products. Our products include key optical and
electronic components for which reliable, high-volume supply is often available only from sole or
limited sources. Increases in market demand or periods of economic weakness have previously
resulted in shortages in availability for important components. Unfavorable economic conditions
can affect our suppliers liquidity level and ability to continue to invest in their business and
to stock components in sufficient quantity. We have experienced increased lead times and a higher
incidence of component discontinuation. These difficulties with suppliers could result in lost
revenue, additional product costs and deployment delays that could harm our business and customer
relationships. We do not have any guarantee of supply from these third parties, and in many cases
relating to the MEN Business, are relying upon temporary or transitional commercial arrangements
intended to facilitate the integration. As a result, there is no assurance that we will be able to
secure the components or subsystems that we require in sufficient quantity and quality on
reasonable terms. The loss of a source of supply, or lack of sufficient availability of key
components, could require that we locate an alternate source or redesign our products, each of
which could increase our costs and negatively affect our product gross margin and results of
operations. Our business and results of operations would be negatively affected if we were to
experience any significant disruption of difficulties with key suppliers affecting the price,
quality, availability or timely delivery of required components.
We may not be successful in selling our products into new markets and developing and managing new
sales channels.
We expanded our geographic presence significantly as a result of the MEN Acquisition, and we
continue to take steps to sell our products into new geographic markets outside of our traditional
markets and to a broader customer base, including other large communications service providers,
enterprises, cable operators, wireless operators and federal, state and local governments. In many
cases, we have less experience in these markets and customers have less familiarity with our
company. To succeed in some of these markets we believe we must develop and manage new sales
channels and distribution arrangements. We expect these relationships to be an important part of
our business internationally as well as for sales to federal, state and local governments. Failure
to manage additional sales channels effectively would limit our ability to succeed in these new
markets and could adversely affect our ability to expand our customer base and grow our business.
We may experience delays in the development of our products that may negatively affect our
competitive position and business.
Our products are based on complex technology, and we can experience unanticipated delays in
developing, manufacturing or deploying them. Each step in the development life cycle of our
products presents serious risks of failure, rework or delay, any one of which could affect the
cost-effective and timely development of our products. The development of our products, including
the integration of the products acquired from the MEN Business into our portfolio and the
development of an integrated software tool to manage the combined portfolio, present significant
complexity. In addition, intellectual property disputes, failure of critical design elements, and
other execution risks may delay or even prevent the release of these products. Delays in product
development may affect our reputation with customers and the timing and level of demand for our
products. If we do not develop and successfully introduce products in a timely manner, our
competitive position may suffer and our business, financial condition and results of operations
would be harmed.
We may be required to write off significant amounts of inventory as a result of our inventory
purchase practices, the convergence of our product lines or unfavorable macroeconomic or industry
conditions.
60
To avoid delays and meet customer demand for shorter delivery terms, we place orders with our
contract manufacturers and suppliers to manufacture components and complete assemblies based in
part on forecasts of customer demand. As a result, our inventory purchases expose us to the risk
that our customers either will not order the products we have forecasted or will purchase fewer
products than forecasted. Unfavorable market or industry conditions can limit visibility into
customer spending plans and compound the difficulty of forecasting inventory at appropriate levels.
Moreover, our customer purchase agreements generally do not guarantee any minimum purchase level,
and customers often have the right to modify, reduce or cancel purchase quantities. As a result, we
may purchase inventory in anticipation of sales that do not occur. Historically, our inventory
write-offs have resulted from the circumstances above. As features and functionalities converge
across our product lines, and we introduce new products, however, we face an additional risk that
customers may forego purchases of one product we have inventoried in favor of another product with
similar functionality. If we are required to write off or write down a significant amount of
inventory, our results of operations for the period would be materially adversely affected.
Restructuring activities could disrupt our business and affect our results of operations.
We have previously taken steps, including reductions in force, office closures, and internal
reorganizations to reduce the size and cost of our operations and to better match our resources
with market opportunities. We may take similar steps in the future, particularly as we seek to
realize operating synergies and cost reductions associated with our recent acquisition of the MEN
Business. These changes could be disruptive to our business and may result in significant expense
including accounting charges for inventory and technology-related write-offs, workforce reduction
costs and charges relating to consolidation of excess facilities. Substantial expense or charges
resulting from restructuring activities could adversely affect our results of operations in the
period in which we take such a charge.
Our failure to manage effectively our relationships with third party service partners could
adversely impact our financial results and relationship with customers.
We rely on a number of third party service partners, both domestic and international, to
complement our global service and support resources. We rely upon these partners for certain
maintenance and support functions, as well as the installation of our equipment in some large
network builds. In order to ensure the proper installation and maintenance of our products, we must
identify, train and certify qualified service partners. Certification can be costly and
time-consuming, and our partners often provide similar services for other companies, including our
competitors. We may not be able to manage effectively our relationships with our service partners
and cannot be certain that they will be able to deliver services in the manner or time required. If
our service partners are unsuccessful in delivering services:
|
|
|
we may suffer delays in recognizing revenue; |
|
|
|
|
our services revenue and gross margin may be adversely affected; and |
|
|
|
|
our relationship with customers could suffer. |
Difficulties with service partners could cause us to transition a larger share of deployment
and other services from third parties to internal resources, thereby increasing our services
overhead costs and negatively affecting our services gross margin and results of operations.
Our intellectual property rights may be difficult and costly to enforce.
We generally rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to
establish and maintain proprietary rights in our products and technology. Although we have been
issued numerous patents and other patent applications are currently pending, there can be no
assurance that any of these patents or other proprietary rights will not be challenged, invalidated
or circumvented or that our rights will provide us with any competitive advantage. In addition,
there can be no assurance that patents will be issued from pending applications or that claims
allowed on any patents will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. Further, the laws of
some foreign countries may not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of
the United States.
We are subject to the risk that third parties may attempt to use our intellectual
property without authorization. Protecting against the unauthorized use of our products, technology
and other proprietary rights is difficult, time-consuming and expensive, and we cannot be certain
that the steps that we are taking will prevent or minimize the risks of such unauthorized use.
Litigation may be necessary to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights or to determine
the validity or scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in
substantial cost and diversion of management time and resources, and there can be no assurance that
we will obtain a successful result. Any inability to protect and enforce our intellectual property
rights, despite our efforts, could harm our ability to compete effectively.
61
We may incur significant costs in response to claims by others that we infringe their intellectual
property rights.
From time to time third parties may assert claims or initiate litigation or other proceedings
related to patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies and
related standards that are relevant to our business. These assertions have increased over time due to our growth, the increased number of products and
competitors in the communications network equipment industry and the corresponding overlaps, and
the general increase in the rate of patent claims assertions, particularly in the United States.
Asserted claims, litigation or other proceedings can include claims against us or our
manufacturers, suppliers or customers, alleging infringement of third party proprietary rights with
respect our existing or future products and technology or components of those products. Regardless
of the merit of these claims, they can be time-consuming, divert the time and attention of our
technical and management personnel, and result in costly litigation. These claims, if successful,
can require us to:
|
|
|
pay substantial damages or royalties; |
|
|
|
|
comply with an injunction or other court order that could prevent us from offering
certain of our products; |
|
|
|
|
seek a license for the use of certain intellectual property, which may not be available
on commercially reasonable terms or at all; |
|
|
|
|
develop non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense
and ultimately may not be successful; and |
|
|
|
|
indemnify our customers pursuant to contractual obligations and pay damages on their
behalf. |
Any of these events could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our exposure to risks associated with the use of intellectual property may be increased as a
result of acquisitions, as we have a lower level of visibility into the development process with
respect to such technology or the steps taken to safeguard against the risks of infringing the
rights of third parties.
Our international scale could expose our business to additional risks and expense and adversely
affect our results of operations.
We market, sell and service our products globally and rely upon a global supply chain for
sourcing of important components and manufacturing of our products. International operations are
subject to inherent risks, including:
|
|
|
effects of changes in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of economic conditions in countries outside the United States; |
|
|
|
|
less protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; |
|
|
|
|
adverse tax and customs consequences, particularly as related to transfer-pricing
issues; |
|
|
|
|
social, political and economic instability; |
|
|
|
|
higher incidence of corruption; |
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures, export compliance, domestic preference procurement
requirements, qualification to transact business and additional regulatory requirements;
and |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters, epidemics and acts of war or terrorism. |
We
expect that we may enter new markets and withdraw from or reduce
operations in others. In some countries, our success will depend in part on our ability to form relationships with
local partners. Our inability to identify appropriate partners or reach mutually satisfactory
arrangements could adversely affect our business and operations. Our global operations may result
in increased risk and expense to our business and could give rise to unanticipated liabilities or
difficulties that could adversely affect our operations and financial results.
Our use and reliance upon development resources in India may expose us to unanticipated costs or
liabilities.
We have a significant development center in India and, in recent years, have increased
headcount and development activity at this facility. There is no assurance that our reliance upon
development resources in India will enable us to achieve meaningful cost reductions or greater
resource efficiency. Further, our development efforts and other operations in India involve
significant risks, including:
|
|
|
difficulty hiring and retaining appropriate engineering resources due to intense
competition for such resources and resulting wage inflation; |
|
|
|
|
the knowledge transfer related to our technology and resulting exposure to
misappropriation of intellectual property or information that is proprietary to us, our
customers and other third parties; |
|
|
|
|
heightened exposure to changes in the economic, security and political conditions of
India; and |
62
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates and tax compliance in India. |
Difficulties resulting from the factors above and other risks related to our operations in
India could expose us to increased expense, impair our development efforts, harm our competitive
position and damage our reputation.
We may be exposed to unanticipated risks and additional obligations in connection with our resale
of complementary products or technology of other companies.
We have entered into agreements with strategic partners that permit us to distribute their
products or technology. We may rely upon these relationships to add complementary products or
technologies, diversify our product portfolio, or address a particular customer or geographic
market. We may enter into additional original equipment manufacturer (OEM), resale or similar
arrangements in the future, including in support of our selection as a domain supply partner with
AT&T. We may incur unanticipated costs or difficulties relating to our resale of third party
products. Our third party relationships could expose us to risks associated with the business and
viability of such partners, as well as delays in their development, manufacturing or delivery of
products or technology. We may also be required by customers to assume warranty, indemnity, service
and other commercial obligations greater than the commitments, if any, made to us by our technology
partners. Some of our strategic partners are relatively small companies with limited financial
resources. If they are unable to satisfy their obligations to us or our customers, we may have to
expend our own resources to satisfy these obligations. Exposure to the risks above could harm our
reputation with key customers and negatively affect our business and our results of operations.
Our exposure to the credit risks of our customers and resellers may make it difficult to collect
receivables and could adversely affect our revenue and operating results.
In the course of our sales to customers, we may have difficulty collecting receivables and
could be exposed to risks associated with uncollectible accounts. We may be exposed to similar
risks relating to third party resellers and other sales channel partners. Lack of liquidity in the
capital markets or a sustained period of unfavorable economic conditions may increase our exposure
to credit risks. While we monitor these situations carefully and attempt to take appropriate
measures to protect ourselves, it is possible that we may have to write down or write off doubtful
accounts. Such write-downs or write-offs could negatively affect our operating results for the
period in which they occur, and, if large, could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and
operating results.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business
effectively.
Competition to attract and retain highly skilled technical, engineering and other personnel
with experience in our industry is intense and our employees have been the subject of targeted
hiring by our competitors. We may experience difficulty retaining and motivating existing employees
and attracting qualified personnel to fill key positions. As a result of the MEN Acquisition,
employees may experience uncertainty, real or perceived, about their role with Ciena as strategies
and initiatives relating to combined operations are announced or executed. Because we rely upon
equity awards as a significant component of compensation, particularly for our executive team, a
lack of positive performance in our stock price, reduced grant levels, or changes to our
compensation program may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key employees. It may
be difficult to replace members of our management team or other key personnel, and the loss of such
individuals could be disruptive to our business. In addition, none of our executive officers is
bound by an employment agreement for any specific term. If we are unable to attract and retain
qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business effectively and our operations and
results of operations could suffer.
We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
As a global concern, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates.
Historically, our sales have primarily been denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result of our
increased global presence from the MEN Acquisition, we expect that a larger percentage of our
revenue will be non-U.S. dollar denominated and therefore subject to foreign currency fluctuation.
In addition, we face exposure to currency exchange rates as a result of our non-U.S. dollar
denominated operating expense in Europe, Asia, Latin America and Canada. We have previously hedged
against currency exposure associated with anticipated foreign currency cash flows and may do so in
the future. There can be no assurance that these hedging instruments will be effective and losses
associated with these instruments or fluctuations and the adverse effect of foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuation may negatively affect our results of operations.
Our products incorporate software and other technology under license from third parties and our
business would be adversely affected if this technology was no longer available to us on
commercially reasonable terms.
63
We integrate third-party software and other technology into our embedded operating system,
network management system tools and other products. Licenses for this technology may not be
available or continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. Third party licensors
may insist on unreasonable financial or other terms in connection with our use of such technology.
Difficulties with third party technology licensors could result in termination of such licenses,
which may result in significant costs and require us to obtain or develop a substitute technology.
Difficulty obtaining and maintaining third-party technology licenses may disrupt development of our
products and increase our costs, which could harm our business.
Our business is dependent upon the proper functioning of our internal business processes and
information systems and modifications to integrate the MEN Business or support future growth may
disrupt our business, operating processes and internal controls.
The successful operation of various internal business processes and information systems
is critical to the efficient operation of our business. If these systems fail or are interrupted,
our operations may be adversely affected and operating results could be harmed. Our business
processes and information systems need to be sufficiently scalable to support the integration of
the MEN Business and future growth of our business. The integration of the MEN Business and
transfer of business support services being performed under the transition services agreement will
require significant modifications relating to our internal business processes and information
systems. Significant changes to our processes and systems expose us to a number of operational
risks. These changes may be costly and disruptive, and could impose substantial demands on
management time. These changes may also require the modification of a number of internal control
procedures and significant training of employees. Any material disruption, malfunction or similar
problems with our business processes or information systems, or the transition to new processes and
systems, could have a negative effect on the operation of our business and our results of
operations.
Strategic acquisitions and investments may expose us to increased costs and unexpected liabilities.
We may acquire, invest in or enter in other strategic technology relationships with other
companies to expand the markets we address, diversify our customer base or acquire or accelerate
the development of technology or products. To do so, we may use cash, incur debt or assume
indebtedness or issue equity that would dilute our current stockholders ownership. These
transactions involve numerous risks, including:
|
|
|
significant integration costs; |
|
|
|
|
integration and rationalization of operations, products, technologies and personnel; |
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty completing projects of the acquired company and costs related to in-process
projects; |
|
|
|
|
the loss of key employees; |
|
|
|
|
ineffective internal controls over financial reporting; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on unfamiliar suppliers or manufacturers; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to unanticipated liabilities, including intellectual property infringement
claims; and |
|
|
|
|
adverse tax or accounting effects including amortization expense related to intangible
assets and charges associated with impairment of goodwill. |
As a result of these and other risks, these acquisitions or strategic transactions may not
reap the intended benefits and may ultimately have a negative impact on our business, results of
operation and financial condition.
Changes in government regulation affecting the communications industry and the businesses of our
customers could harm our prospects and operating results.
The Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, has jurisdiction over the U.S. communications
industry and similar agencies have jurisdiction over the communication industries in other
countries. Many of our largest customers are subject to the rules and regulations of these
agencies. Changes in regulatory requirements in the United States or other countries could inhibit
service providers from investing in their communications network infrastructures or introducing new
services. These changes could adversely affect the sale of our products and services. Changes in
regulatory tariff requirements or other regulations relating to pricing or terms of carriage on
communications networks could slow the development or expansion of network infrastructures and
adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
64
Governmental regulations affecting the use, import or export of products could negatively
affect our revenue.
The United States and various foreign governments have imposed controls, license requirements
and other restrictions on the usage, import or export of some of the technologies that we sell.
Governmental regulation of usage, import or export of our products, or our failure to obtain required approvals for our products, could harm our
international and domestic sales and adversely affect our revenue and costs of sales. Failure to
comply with such regulations could result in enforcement actions, fines or penalties and
restrictions on export privileges. In addition, costly tariffs on our equipment, restrictions on
importation, trade protection measures and domestic preference requirements of certain countries
could limit our access to these markets and harm our sales. For example, Indias government has
recently implemented certain rules applicable to non-Indian network equipment vendors and is
considering further restrictions that may inhibit sales of certain communications equipment,
including equipment manufactured in China, where certain of our products are assembled. These and
other regulations could adversely affect the sale or use of our products and could adversely affect
our business and revenue.
Governmental regulations related to the environment and potential climate change, could adversely
affect our business and operating results.
Our operations are regulated under various federal, state, local and international laws
relating to the environment and potential climate change. We could incur fines, costs related to
damage to property or personal injury, and costs related to investigation or remediation
activities, if we were to violate or become liable under these laws or regulations. Our product
design efforts, and the manufacturing of our products, are also subject to evolving requirements
relating to the presence of certain materials or substances in our equipment, including regulations
that make producers for such products financially responsible for the collection, treatment and
recycling of certain products. For example, our operations and financial results may be negatively
affected by environmental regulations, such as the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)
and Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment
(RoHS) that have been adopted by the European Union. Compliance with these and similar
environmental regulations may increase our cost of designing, manufacturing, selling and removing
our products. These regulations may also make it difficult to obtain supply of compliant components
or require us to write off non-compliant inventory, which could have an adverse effect our business
and operating results.
We may be required to write down goodwill and long-lived assets and these impairment charges would
adversely affect our operating results.
As of July 31, 2010, our balance sheet includes $38.1 million of goodwill and $642.6 million
in long-lived assets, which includes $470.6 million of intangible assets. Goodwill relates to the
excess of the total purchase price of the MEN Acquisition over the fair value of the net acquired
assets. We have incurred significant charges in the past relating to impairment of goodwill that
we have acquired from business combinations. Valuation of our long-lived assets requires us to
make assumptions about future sales prices and sales volumes for our products. These assumptions
are used to forecast future, undiscounted cash flows. Given the significant uncertainty and
instability of macroeconomic conditions in recent periods, forecasting future business is
difficult and subject to modification. If actual market conditions differ or our forecasts change,
we may be required to reassess long-lived assets and could record an impairment charge. Any
impairment charge relating to goodwill or long-lived assets would have the effect of decreasing
our earnings or increasing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial
impairment charge, our operating results could be materially adversely affected in such period.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we include in our annual report a
report containing managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over
financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year and a statement as to whether or not such
internal controls are effective. Compliance with these requirements has resulted in, and is likely
to continue to result in, significant costs and the commitment of time and operational resources.
Changes in our business, including the MEN Acquisition, will necessitate modifications to our
internal control systems, processes and information systems. Our increase global operations and
expansion into new regions could pose additional challenges to our internal control systems. We
cannot be certain that our current design for internal control over financial reporting will be
sufficient to enable management or our independent registered public accounting firm to determine
that our internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis. If we or our
independent registered public accounting firms are unable to assert that our internal controls over
financial reporting are effective, our business may be harmed. Market perception of our financial
condition and the trading price of our stock may be adversely affected, and customer perception of
our business may suffer.
65
Our outstanding indebtedness on our convertible notes and lower cash balance may adversely affect
our business.
At July 31, 2010, indebtedness on our outstanding convertible notes totaled $1.2 billion in
aggregate principal. Our use of cash to acquire the MEN Business, together with our private
placement of $375.0 million in aggregate principal amount of additional convertible notes in March 2010 to fund in part the purchase price, resulted in
significant additional indebtedness and materially reduced our existing cash balance.
Our indebtedness and lower cash balance could have important negative consequences, including:
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing, particularly in light of
unfavorable conditions in the credit markets; |
|
|
|
|
reducing the availability of cash resources for other purposes, including capital
expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and
the markets in which we compete; and |
|
|
|
|
placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage to competitors that have better
access to capital resources. |
We may also add additional indebtedness such as equipment loans, working capital lines of
credit and other long-term debt.
Our stock price is volatile.
Our common stock price has experienced substantial volatility in the past and may remain
volatile in the future. Volatility in our stock price can arise as a result of a number of the
factors discussed in this Risk Factors section. During fiscal 2009, our stock price ranged from a
high of $16.64 per share to a low of $4.98 per share. The stock market has experienced extreme
price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many technology companies,
with such volatility often unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Divergence
between our actual or anticipated financial results and published expectations of analysts can
cause significant swings in our stock price. Our stock price can also be affected by announcements
that we, our competitors, or our customers may make, particularly announcements related to
acquisitions or other significant transactions. Our common stock is included in a number of market
indices and any change in the composition of these indices to exclude our company would adversely
affect our stock price. On December 18, 2009, we were removed from the S&P 500, a widely-followed
index. These factors, as well as conditions affecting the general economy or financial markets, may
materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock in the future.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment
of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
Amendment to Change in Control Severance Agreements
On September 8, 2010, the Compensation Committee of Cienas Board of Directors approved an
amendment to the standard form of change in control severance agreements Ciena has previously
entered into with our executive officers, including the named executive officers from our most
recent proxy statement (Gary B. Smith, James E. Moylan, Jr., Stephen B. Alexander and Michael G.
Aquino) and our principal operating officer (Philippe Morin). These agreements provide for the
provision of certain severance benefits in the event that such officers employment is terminated
by Ciena or any successor entity without cause, or by the officer for good reason, within one
year following a change in control of Ciena (a covered termination).
The amended form of severance agreements, among other things, modifies the amount of cash severance
payable, the period of benefits coverage continuity and treatment of equity awards upon a covered
termination. Mr. Smiths severance agreement was amended to provide a lump sum payment of two and
one-half times his base salary and annual target incentive bonus upon a covered termination. His
agreement previously provided for a lump sum payment of the greater of $2 million or the sum of his
base salary and annual target incentive bonus. Mr. Smiths severance agreement was also amended to
increase the length of his post-termination non-competition and non-solicitation obligations, upon
which receipt of the severance benefits are conditioned, from 12 to 18 months. The severance
agreements of the other Named Executive Officers were amended to provide a lump sum payment of one
and one-half times base salary and annual target incentive bonus upon a covered termination. These
agreements previously provided for one year of salary continuation and target incentive bonus
payments, payable quarterly. The amended form of severance agreements increases from 12 to 18
months the period of continuity of benefits coverage for each officer, while at the same time
eliminating any continuity of life and disability insurance coverage and removing the gross up for
additional taxes incurred by the officer by reason of any income realized as a result of the
continuation of benefits coverage. With regard to the treatment of equity awards upon a covered
termination, the amended form of severance agreement increases from 50% to 100% the acceleration of
vesting of outstanding awards, thereby aligning the Named Executive Officers with the treatment of
equity in Mr. Smiths existing agreement.
66
The amended form of severance agreements also modifies the definition of cause, as it is used in
the agreement, such that the revised definition includes the following conditions:
|
|
|
the officers willful or continued failure substantially to perform the duties of his
position, as determined by the Governance and Nominations Committee of the Board; |
|
|
|
|
any willful act or omission in connection with such officers responsibilities as an
employee constituting dishonesty, fraud or other malfeasance, immoral conduct or gross
misconduct; |
|
|
|
|
any willful material violation of Cienas Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or the
contractual proprietary information, inventions and non-solicitation arrangements between
Ciena and such officer; or |
|
|
|
|
the officers conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, a felony or a crime of moral
turpitude. |
The amended form of severance agreements also modifies the definition of change in control, as it
is used in the agreement, such that the revised definition includes a change in the composition of
the Board of Directors occurring within a two year period, as a result of which less than a
majority of the directors are incumbent directors, which includes either existing directors or
directors who are elected or nominated for election with the affirmative votes of at least a
majority of the directors of Ciena at the time of such election or nomination (but not including
individuals who are elected or nominated in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest
relating to the election of directors).
Lastly, the amended form of severance agreements eliminates the perpetual term in favor of a fixed,
three-year term, provided that the term is subject to an automatic extension in the event that
Ciena is in active
negotiations regarding, or has entered into a definitive agreement with respect to, a change of
control transaction.
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
101.INS* |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
101.SCH* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
101.CAL* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
101.DEF* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
101.LAB* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
101.PRE* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
* |
|
In accordance with Regulation S-T, XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) related information
in Exhibit No. (101) to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed furnished
and not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and shall not be incorporated by
reference into any registration statement pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
67
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ciena Corporation
|
|
Date: September 8, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Gary B. Smith
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Smith |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: September 8, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ James E. Moylan, Jr.
|
|
|
|
James E. Moylan, Jr. |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
68