e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
|
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011. |
or
|
|
|
o |
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
|
for the transition from to . |
Commission File Number: 333-82900
ThermoGenesis Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-3018487 |
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2711 Citrus Road
Rancho Cordova, California 95742
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(916) 858-5100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at May 3, 2011 |
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value
|
|
16,346,366 |
ThermoGenesis Corp.
INDEX
i
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|
|
ThermoGenesis Corp.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
13,545,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,731,000 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $26,000 ($34,000 at June 30, 2010) |
|
|
4,464,000 |
|
|
|
6,095,000 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
6,164,000 |
|
|
|
5,034,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
301,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
24,288,000 |
|
|
|
22,161,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation of $3,354,000
($3,241,000 at June 30, 2010) |
|
|
1,383,000 |
|
|
|
1,701,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
264,000 |
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,935,000 |
|
|
$ |
24,030,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,898,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,383,000 |
|
Accrued payroll and related expenses |
|
|
482,000 |
|
|
|
309,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
196,000 |
|
|
|
854,000 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,534,000 |
|
|
|
2,028,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
4,110,000 |
|
|
|
5,574,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
|
227,000 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Footnote 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 80,000,000 shares
authorized; 16,346,366 issued and outstanding
(14,023,240 at June 30, 2010) |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Paid in capital in excess of par |
|
|
126,015,000 |
|
|
|
121,317,000 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(104,951,000 |
) |
|
|
(103,552,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
21,080,000 |
|
|
|
17,779,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,935,000 |
|
|
$ |
24,030,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
Page 3
ThermoGenesis Corp.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
5,165,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,764,000 |
|
|
$ |
18,022,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,912,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
3,145,000 |
|
|
|
3,363,000 |
|
|
|
11,051,000 |
|
|
|
10,943,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
2,020,000 |
|
|
|
1,401,000 |
|
|
|
6,971,000 |
|
|
|
4,969,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
2,151,000 |
|
|
|
1,722,000 |
|
|
|
6,424,000 |
|
|
|
5,975,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
1,080,000 |
|
|
|
2,214,000 |
|
|
|
4,074,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
2,866,000 |
|
|
|
2,802,000 |
|
|
|
8,638,000 |
|
|
|
10,049,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
268,000 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(845,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,365,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,399,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,022,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per
common share |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per share
data |
|
|
14,846,366 |
|
|
|
14,023,240 |
|
|
|
14,306,095 |
|
|
|
14,023,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
Page 4
ThermoGenesis Corp.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,399,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,022,000 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
362,000 |
|
|
|
361,000 |
|
Stock based compensation expense |
|
|
761,000 |
|
|
|
419,000 |
|
Gain on disposal of equipment |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on impairment of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
Accretion of discount on short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
Net change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
1,631,000 |
|
|
|
(782,000 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(1,034,000 |
) |
|
|
(391,000 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
186,000 |
|
|
|
454,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(96,000 |
) |
|
|
59,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(485,000 |
) |
|
|
509,000 |
|
Accrued payroll and related expenses |
|
|
173,000 |
|
|
|
(437,000 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(540,000 |
) |
|
|
(477,000 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(543,000 |
) |
|
|
248,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(985,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,035,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(156,000 |
) |
|
|
(469,000 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of equipment |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,741,000 |
) |
Maturities of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,727,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities |
|
|
(139,000 |
) |
|
|
3,517,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
3,932,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |
|
|
3,938,000 |
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,814,000 |
|
|
|
(1,521,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
10,731,000 |
|
|
|
6,655,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
13,545,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,134,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental non-cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of equipment to inventories |
|
$ |
96,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of equipment to other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
137,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of equipment to receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of inventories to equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
Page 5
ThermoGenesis Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Basis of Presentation
ThermoGenesis Corp. (the Company, we or our) designs, manufactures and markets automated and
semi-automated devices and single-use processing disposables that enable hospitals and blood banks
to manufacture a therapeutic dose of stem cells. Initially, we developed medical devices for ultra
rapid freezing and thawing of blood components, which we manufacture and distribute to blood banks
and hospitals.
On August 11, 2010, we announced that our board of directors had approved a 1-for-4 reverse stock
split of our common stock, pursuant to previously obtained stockholder authorization. The reverse
stock split, which became effective at the close of business on August 26, 2010, reduced the number
of shares of our common stock issued and outstanding from approximately 56 million to approximately
14 million. All share and per share amounts herein are presented on a post-reverse-split basis.
Interim Reporting
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual
financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant
to such Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and regulations and accounting principles
applicable for interim periods. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of
normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Events
subsequent to the balance sheet date have been evaluated for inclusion in the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements through the date of issuance. Operating results for
the nine month period ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for the year ending June 30, 2011. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from the sale of our products are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred (or services have been rendered), the price is fixed or determinable,
and collectability is reasonably assured. We generally ship products F.O.B. shipping point. There
is no conditional evaluation on any product sold and recognized as revenue. All foreign sales are
denominated in U.S. dollars. Amounts billed in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as
deferred revenue on the balance sheet.
Our sales are generally through distributors. There is no right of return provided for
distributors. For sales of products made to distributors, we consider a number of factors in
determining whether revenue is recognized upon transfer of title to the distributor, or when
payment is received. These factors include, but are not limited to, whether the payment terms
offered to the distributor are considered to be non-standard, the distributor history of adhering
to the terms of its contractual arrangements with us, the level of inventories maintained by the
distributor, whether we have a pattern of granting concessions for the benefit of the distributor,
and whether there are other conditions that may indicate that the sale to the
Page 6
distributor is not substantive. We currently recognize revenue primarily on the sell-in method
with our distributors.
Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into units of accounting if certain
criteria are met, including whether the deliverable item(s) has value to the customer on a
stand-alone basis. Revenue for each unit of accounting is recognized as the unit of accounting is
delivered. Arrangement consideration is allocated to each unit of accounting based upon the
relative estimated selling prices of the separate units of accounting contained within an
arrangement containing multiple deliverables. Estimated selling prices are determined using vendor
specific objective evidence of value (VSOE), when available, or an estimate of selling price when
VSOE is not available for a given unit of accounting. Significant inputs for the estimates of the
selling price of separate units of accounting include market and pricing trends and a customers
geographic location. We account for training and installation, and service agreements as separate
units of accounting.
Service revenue generated from contracts for providing maintenance of equipment is amortized over
the life of the agreement. All other service revenue is recognized at the time the service is
completed.
For licensing agreements pursuant to which we receive up-front licensing fees for products or
technologies that will be provided by us over the term of the arrangements, we defer the up-front
fees and recognizes the fees as revenue on a straight-line method over the term of the respective
license. For license agreements that require no continuing performance on our part, license fee
revenue is recognized immediately upon grant of the license.
Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in net revenues, while the related
costs are included in cost of revenues.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued
liabilities approximate fair value due to their short duration.
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codifications (ASC) ASC 820 Fair Values Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC 820), we measure our cash equivalents at fair value. ASC 820 clarifies that fair
value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is
a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing an asset or liability.
ASC 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure
fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows. Level 1
inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level
2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration,
for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs
based on managements own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A
financial asset or liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Page 7
As of March 31, 2011, we did not have any Level 2 or 3 financial instruments.
Level 1 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis include the following as of March 31,
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
Cash equivalents Money market funds |
|
$ |
1,059,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Reporting
We operate in a single segment providing medical devices and disposables to hospitals and blood
banks throughout the world which utilize the equipment to process blood components.
Net Loss per Share
Net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding. The calculation of the basic and diluted net loss per share is the same for
all periods presented, as the effect of the potential common stock equivalents is anti-dilutive due
to our net loss position for all periods presented. Anti-dilutive securities, which consist of
warrants, stock options and common stock restricted awards that were not included in diluted net
loss per common share were 2,619,331 and 979,405 as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Account Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Improving Disclosures
about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06). ASU 2010-06 amends ASC Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820) to require additional disclosures regarding fair value
measurements. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 requires entities to disclose additional information
regarding (i) the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales,
issuances and settlements on a gross basis, (ii) the amounts of significant transfers between Level
1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers and (iii) the reasons
for any transfers in or out of Level 3. In addition to these new disclosure requirements, ASU
2010-06 also amends ASC 820 to further clarify existing guidance pertaining to the level of
disaggregation at which fair value disclosures should be made and the requirements to disclose
information about the valuation techniques and inputs used in estimating Level 2 and Level 3 fair
value measurements. Our adoption of the requirements of this guidance on January 1, 2010, except
for the requirement to separately disclose information about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements on a gross basis which was
adopted on July 1, 2010, did not have a material impact on the our consolidated results of
operations or financial condition.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605):
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for
multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services separately
rather than as a combined unit and modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is
allocated across the separately identified deliverables. ASU 2009-13 significantly expands the
disclosure requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU 2009-13 is effective
for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2010, and may be applied
retrospectively for all periods presented or prospectively to arrangements entered into or
materially modified after the adoption date. We adopted ASU 2009-13 effective July 1, 2010. The
adoption of ASU 2009-13 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or
financial condition.
Page 8
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements that Include
Software Elements-A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force which amends ASC 985-605,
Software Revenue Recognition (ASU 2009-14) to exclude tangible products that include software and
non-software components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality.
This issue shall be applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We adopted ASU 2009-14
effective July 1, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2009-14 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to
Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (ASU 2010-09). ASU 2010-09 amends ASC Topic 855 to
remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose the date through which subsequent events have
been evaluated both in issued and revised financial statements. ASU 2010-09 was effective
immediately. The adoption of ASU 2010-09 did not have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations or financial condition.
2. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
1,790,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,496,000 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
1,679,000 |
|
|
|
1,690,000 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
2,695,000 |
|
|
|
1,848,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,164,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,034,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Commitments and Contingencies
Vendor Purchase Commitments
A product manufacturing supplier made purchases of raw materials based on Company-provided
forecasts. We may be required to pay for these raw materials as part of normal manufacturing
processes, including scrap and obsolete parts that result from our product design changes, and or
discontinuation of manufacturing by the manufacturing supplier. These are normal and standard
manufacturing terms, and we recorded an estimated loss contingency of $84,000 as management
considers it probable that the payment will be made.
We have initiated discussions with a product manufacturing supplier (Supplier) regarding various
manufacturing and quality issues. The Supplier was instructed to suspend production, but has
incurred some costs under existing purchase orders. We recorded an estimated loss contingency of
$58,000 during the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as management considers it probable that the
payment will be made. This estimated loss contingency is included in other current liabilities at
March 31, 2011.
Page 9
Warranty
We offer a one-year warranty on all of our products. We warrant disposable products through their
expiration date. We periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liabilities and
adjust the amounts as necessary.
The warranty liability is included in other current liabilities in the unaudited consolidated
balance sheet. The change in the warranty liability for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 is
summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,113,000 |
|
Warranties issued during the period |
|
|
209,000 |
|
Settlements made during the period |
|
|
(443,000 |
) |
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties during the
period, including expirations |
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
809,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Stockholders Equity
Common Stock
On March 9, 2011, the Company completed a public offering of 2,250,000 shares of its common stock,
together with warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,125,000 shares of common stock with a
per unit purchase price of $2.00. The warrants may be exercised by the holders at an exercise
price of $2.64 per share starting September 9, 2011 continuing through March 9, 2016. Net proceeds
after expenses from the offering were approximately $3,932,000.
Stock Based Compensation
We recorded stock-based compensation of $154,000 and $761,000 for the three and nine months ended
March 31, 2011 and $120,000 and $419,000 for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010,
respectively.
The following is a summary of option activity for our stock option plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,225,955 |
|
|
$ |
4.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
465,850 |
|
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or Expired |
|
|
(194,558 |
) |
|
$ |
4.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,917 |
) |
|
$ |
2.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,494,330 |
|
|
$ |
3.86 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and Expected to Vest at
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,367,252 |
|
|
$ |
3.96 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
452,642 |
|
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 10
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of
the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Companys common stock for the 11,250 options
that were in-the-money at March 31, 2011. During the nine months ended March 31, 2011, the
aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under the Companys stock option plans was $1,000,
determined as of the date of option exercise. There were no options exercised during the nine
months ended March 31, 2010.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010 our independent board members were granted in the
aggregate a total of 150,000 four-year options which vest over three years. The exercise price of
the options was set at the closing market price on the date of grant. As our independent board
members do not have to serve on the board in order to vest in the options over the three years
(there is no requisite service period) the fair value of the options is immediately expensed on the
grant date. Accordingly, we have recorded $250,000 of stock compensation expense as a component of
selling, general and administrative expenses during the three months ended December 31, 2010.
On November 3, 2010, we entered into a four-year distribution agreement (Agreement) with Nanshan
Memorial Medical Institute (Nanshan) for distribution of our Res-Q and MXP products in China and
Hong Kong. As part of the Agreement, we initially granted Nanshan restricted stock equal to
one-half percent of the total outstanding common shares of the Company, or 70,117 shares. The
shares are restricted for a minimum period of six months and will be released from restriction
pending performance by Nanshan in accordance with the Agreement. As the restricted stock has a
performance commitment, it is being amortized over the shortest period over which the shares may
vest, six months. Accordingly, we have recorded $40,000 and $122,000 of stock compensation expense
as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses, which represents our estimate of
the fair value of the portion of the award that was earned during the three and nine month periods
ended March 31, 2011, respectively. In addition, the Agreement calls for the issuance of up to an
additional 806,000 shares of restricted stock upon the completion of certain revenue milestones.
The maximum number of restricted shares issuable totals 876,117 and is based upon the milestone
achievement of $43 million in cumulative sales over the term of the Agreement.
5. Subsequent Event
The Company classifies assets as held for sale and ceases the depreciation of the assets when they
meet the held for sale criteria, as defined in applicable U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, management has
classified the assets of the ThermoLine product line as held for sale as of April 14, 2011, as
management considers a sale probable within one year, the assets are marketed at a reasonable price
and management believes it is unlikely there will be a significant change to the plan of sale. The
following table sets forth the assets held for sale of the ThermoLine product line as of March 31,
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
948,000 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
107,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held for sale |
|
$ |
1,205,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking
statements contained herein. When used in this report, the words anticipate, believe,
estimate, expect and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or its management are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Our actual results, performance or
achievements could differ materially
Page 11
from the results expressed in, or implied by these forward-looking statements. We wish to caution
readers of the important factors, among others, that in some cases have affected, and in the future
could affect our actual results and could cause actual results for fiscal year 2011 and beyond, to
differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of,
the Company. These factors include without limitation, the ability to obtain capital and other
financing in the amounts and at the times needed to complete clinical trials and product marketing
for new products, market acceptance of new products, regulatory approval and time frames for such
approval of new products and new claims for existing products, realization of forecasted income and
expenses, initiatives by competitors, price pressures, failure to meet FDA regulations governing
our products and operations and recalls associated with such regulations, the risks associated with
initiating manufacturing for new products, and the risk factors listed from time to time in our SEC
reports, including, in particular, the factors and discussion in our Form 10-K for fiscal year
2010.
Overview
ThermoGenesis designs, develops and commercializes cell processing products that enable the
practice of regenerative medicine. Our products automate the volume reduction and cryopreservation
process of adult stem cell concentrates from cord blood and bone marrow for use in laboratory and
point of care settings. We were founded in 1986 and are located in Rancho Cordova, California.
Our growth strategy is to expand our offerings in regenerative medicine and partner with other
pioneers in the stem cell arena to accelerate our worldwide penetration in this potentially
explosive market.
Our Products
The AutoXpress Platform or AXP® is a medical device with an accompanying disposable bag
set that isolates and retrieves stem cells from umbilical cord blood. The AXP provides cord blood
banks with a system to isolate and capture adult stem cells with lower labor costs and a reduced
risk of contamination, under GMPs. Our market for the AXP includes both private and public cord
blood banks. At a private bank, an individual pays to have cord blood stem cells from their
offspring collected and stored, while a public bank owns cord blood stem cells donated by
individuals, which are then available to the public for transplantation. The product is an
automated, closed, sterile system that volume-reduces cord blood to a user defined volume in 30
minutes, able to retain over 93% of the mononuclear cells. Self-powered and
microprocessor-controlled, the AXP contains flow control optical sensors which achieve precise
separation.
The MarrowXpress or MXP, an extension of the AXP, defines a new processing standard for
isolating and retrieving stem cells from bone marrow aspirate. It is an automated, closed, sterile
system that volume-reduces blood to a user-defined volume while retaining over 90% of the
mononuclear cells. Self-powered and microprocessor-controlled, the MarrowXpress Platform contains
flow control optical sensors which achieve precise separation.
The Res-Q 60 BMC (Res-Q) product is also used for bone marrow stem cell processing. Launched in
July 2009, Res-Q can be used in a clinical laboratory or can be used inter-operatively at the point
of care. The technology is a next generation, centrifuge-based disposable device designed for the
isolation and extraction of specific stem cell populations at the point of care. Res-Q is a rapid
processing, reliable, and easy-to-use product which achieves a high recovery of stem cells from
bone marrow. The key advantages of the Res-Q System include delivering a high number of target
cells from a small sample of bone marrow and providing a disposable that is highly portable and
packaged for the sterile field. These features allow the physician to process bone marrow and
return the cells to the patient in as little as 15 minutes. As cell processing for regenerative
medicine applications becomes more readily accepted, we believe the features and benefits of the
Res-Q position the product for broad-based adoption.
Page 12
On October 13, 2010, we entered into a License and Distribution Agreement with BioParadox for the
exclusive worldwide rights for the use, research and commercialization of Res-Q technology in the
production of Platelet Rich Plasma for cardiovascular disease.
The BioArchive® System is an automated cryogenic system used in stem
cell therapy to cryopreserve and archive stem cells for future transplant and treatment. Launched
in fiscal 1998, over 200 BioArchive Systems have been purchased by over 90 umbilical cord blood
stem cell banks in over 30 countries worldwide to archive, cryopreserve and store stem cell
preparations extracted from human placentas and umbilical cords for future use. The BioArchive
System can store over 3,600 stem cell samples. It is the only fully-automated system commercially
available that integrates controlled-rate freezing, sample management and long term cryogenic
storage in liquid nitrogen. The robotic storage and retrieval of these stem cell units improves
cell viability, provides precise inventory management and minimizes the possibility of human error.
We currently assemble the BioArchive device and outsource the manufacturing of the disposables.
It is our intent to explore outsourcing alternatives to in-house manufacturing for the BioArchive
device after completion of design upgrades.
The Thermoline product line includes the ultra-rapid plasma Thermoline Freezer and ultra-rapid
plasma Thermoline Thawer. The Thermoline freezer optimizes plasma freezing through its liquid heat
transfer and uniform freezing technologies that can freeze units of blood plasma in approximately
30 minutes. These products are suited for medium to large laboratories. We also offer three models
of blood component thawers which vary primarily by capacity. The products flexible membrane
technology allows for a closed thawing system. These instruments can be used for rapid (less than
12 minutes) homogeneous thawing of plasma and glycerolized frozen red blood cells. We outsource
the manufacturing to a contract manufacturer for the Thermoline devices. We intend and are in
negotiations to divest this product line.
The CryoSeal® Fibrin Sealant (CryoSeal) System is an automated system serving the wound
market used to prepare an autologous hemostatic surgical sealant from a patients own blood or from
a single donor in approximately one hour. We received a Premarket Approval (PMA) to market the
CryoSeal in liver resection surgeries in July 2007. On June 16, 2010, we reached an agreement with
Asahi in which Asahi paid us $1 million to provide CryoSeal products and clinical support services
until such time as Asahi assumes manufacturing of the product line in Japan or December 31, 2012,
whichever comes first. As part of the $1 million payment, we granted Asahi an option to acquire
the CryoSeal product line, which may be exercised over the next five years.
The following is managements discussion and analysis of certain significant factors which have
affected our financial condition and results of operations during the period included in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Managements discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based
upon the condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these condensed
consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including
those related to bad debts, inventories, warranties, contingencies and litigation. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For a
full discussion of our accounting estimates and assumptions that we
Page 13
have identified as critical in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements,
please refer to our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 as Compared to the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2010
Net Revenues:
Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $5,165,000 compared to $4,764,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of $401,000 or 8%. The increase in revenues is
primarily due to an increase in BioArchive device and accessory revenues of $418,000 as there were
two more BioArchive devices sold in the current quarter and an increase in Res-Q disposables of
$325,000. These increases were offset by a decrease in AXP disposable revenues of $280,000 as our
largest end user customer is has seen a decrease in cord blood collections due to the economy.
The following represents the Companys cumulative BioArchive devices sold into the following
geographies through the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Asia |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
United States |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Europe |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Rest of World |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following represents the Companys revenues for disposables by product line for the three
months ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
AXP |
|
$ |
1,480,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,760,000 |
|
BioArchive |
|
|
959,000 |
|
|
|
1,007,000 |
|
Res-Q |
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
CryoSeal |
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
179,000 |
|
MXP |
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,978,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total
Company revenues |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
The Companys gross profit was $2,020,000 or 39% of net revenues for the three months ended March
31, 2011, as compared to $1,401,000 or 29% for the corresponding fiscal 2010 period. The increase
in gross profit is primarily due to higher warranty costs recorded in the third quarter of the
prior year associated with the BioArchive device and AXP disposable and a significant decrease in
production rework costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $2,151,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2011, compared to $1,722,000 for the comparable fiscal 2010 period, an increase of $429,000 or 25%.
The increase is primarily due to an increase in professional fees of $240,000 for strategic
consultants and
Page 14
investments bankers and an increase in recruiting costs of $70,000.
Research and Development Expenses:
Included in this line item are Engineering, Regulatory, Scientific and Clinical Affairs.
Research and development expenses were $715,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared
to $1,080,000 for the comparable fiscal 2010 period, a decrease of $365,000 or 34%. The decrease
is primarily due to a $300,000 decrease in salaries, benefits and bonus due to lower headcount and
a $55,000 decrease in patent costs. We expect to increase research and development expenses in
connection with new product development projects.
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2011 as Compared to the Nine Months Ended
March 31, 2010
Net Revenues:
Revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 were $18,022,000 compared to $15,912,000 for the
nine months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of $2,110,000 or 13%. This increase is primarily due
to increases in Res-Q disposables and BioArchive devices. Res-Q disposables increased as our
initial distributor, Celling Technologies, more than tripled their volume from the corresponding
period of the prior year. The increase in BioArchive devices of $814,000 is primarily due to the
sale of an additional four devices for the nine months ending March 31, 2011 versus March 31, 2010.
The following represents the Companys revenues for disposables by product line for the nine months
ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
AXP |
|
$ |
6,145,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,474,000 |
|
BioArchive |
|
|
2,397,000 |
|
|
|
2,976,000 |
|
Res-Q |
|
|
1,583,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
MXP |
|
|
227,000 |
|
|
|
415,000 |
|
CryoSeal |
|
|
404,000 |
|
|
|
389,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,756,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,554,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total
Company revenues |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
The Companys gross profit was $6,971,000 or 39% of net revenues for the nine months ended March
31, 2011, as compared to $4,969,000 or 31% for the corresponding fiscal 2010 period. The increase
in gross margin for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 is primarily due to lower warranty costs
of $377,000, lower rework costs and we reduced vendor qualification costs paid to our new contract
manufacturers from the corresponding period of the prior year.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $6,424,000 for the nine months ended March 31,
2011, compared to $5,975,000 for the comparable fiscal 2010 period, an increase of $449,000 or 8%.
The increase is primarily due to an increase in stock compensation expense of $390,000 attributable
to options granted to the independent members of our board of directors in the quarter ended
December 31, 2010 and the amortization of the initial grant of restricted stock to Nanshan upon
signing their distributor
Page 15
agreement and increases in professional fees as noted above. These increases
were offset by a reduction of $180,000 in recruiting costs for the nine months ended March 31,
2011.
Research and Development Expenses:
Included in this line item are Engineering, Regulatory, Scientific and Clinical Affairs.
Research and development expenses were $2,214,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2011,
compared to $4,074,000 for the comparable fiscal 2010 period, a decrease of $1,860,000 or 46%.
This is primarily due to $340,000 of expense in the nine months ended March 31, 2010 for the
consulting fees and termination of the consulting agreement with the Companys former Chief
Technology Architect. Also, there was a decrease in salary and benefits of $780,000 due to lower
headcount and the costs incurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 associated with the hiring of
a new Vice President, Chief Quality and Regulatory Affairs Officer and a $275,000 decrease in costs
due to completion of development of the Res-Q and other projects during fiscal 2010.
Interest and Other Income, Net:
In October 2010, we were awarded $244,000 in federal grant funding from the Department of Health
and Human Services through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Grants were available
for up to 50 percent of expenses directly related to qualifying products for therapies designed to
treat or prevent diseases or other chronic conditions. Our award was for the development and
commercialization of our Res-Q platform technology which occurred in fiscal 2009. We have no
further obligations under the grant. The $244,000 was recorded as other income in the quarter
ended December 31, 2010.
Impact of Inflation
Our operations have not been materially affected by inflation or changing prices because most
contracts are short term in nature.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $13,545,000 and working capital of
$20,178,000. This compares to cash and cash equivalents of $10,731,000 and working capital of
$16,587,000 at June 30, 2010. The Company raised net proceeds of $3,932,000 through a public
offering of common stock during the nine months ended March 31, 2011. We expect to use the net
proceeds from this offering for general working capital purposes. These purposes include new
product development initiatives, support of our Asian channel development efforts and acceleration
of our product cost reduction initiatives. Specifically, we are evaluating and prioritizing
product line extensions and enhancements as well as novel product designs according to their
potential for near term, high margin, revenue generation. These opportunities include but are not
limited to the development of new disposable collection, processing and storage technologies for
stem cells sourced from cord blood, bone marrow and adipose tissues. This was offset by the
funding of operations and other cash needs of the Company. We have primarily financed operations
through private and public placement of equity securities and have raised approximately
$112,000,000, net of expenses, through common and preferred stock financings and exercises of
options and warrants.
Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 was $985,000,
primarily due to the net loss of $1,399,000, offset by depreciation and stock based compensation
expense of $362,000 and $761,000, respectively. Inventories utilized cash of $1,034,000 in part
due to placing high volume orders in order to secure lower costs.
We believe our currently available cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations
will be sufficient to satisfy our operating and working capital requirements for at least the next
eighteen months. Our ability to fund our longer-term cash needs is subject to various risks, many
of which are beyond our
Page 16
control. See Part I Item 1A Risk Factors set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal
year ended June 30, 2010. Further, with current performance trends, we intend to focus on
potential business opportunities, which may include possible acquisitions or strategic partner
arrangements, any of which may require investment of capital to facilitate the potential for
greater revenue growth. Should we require additional funding, such as additional capital
investments, we may need to raise the required additional funds through bank borrowings or public
or private sales of debt or equity securities. We cannot assure that such funding will be
available in needed quantities or on terms favorable to us, if at all.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2011, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Backlog
Our cancelable backlog at March 31, 2011 was $890,000. Our backlog consists of product orders for
which a customer purchase order has been received and is scheduled for shipment within the next
twelve months. Orders are subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the customer, sometimes with
a cancellation charge. Due to timing of order placement, product lead times, changes in product
delivery schedules and cancellations, and because sales will often reflect orders shipped in the
same quarter received, our backlog at any particular date is not necessarily indicative of sales
for any succeeding period.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 and are not required to provide information under this item.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our Chief Executive Officer along with our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of our fiscal quarter pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the
three months ended March 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting. We believe that a control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within any company have been
detected.
Page 17
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In the normal course of operations, we may have disagreements or disputes with
distributors, vendors or employees. Such potential disputes are seen by management
as a normal part of business.
There are currently neither any pending actions nor any threatened actions that
management believes would have a significant material impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the risk factors discussed below and other information set forth in
this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item
1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results. There have been no material changes from those risk factors, other than
the risk factors listed below. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form
10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
currently known or knowable to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also
may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating
results.
Our Business is Indirectly Subject to Customer and Distributor Inventory
Requirements and Continuity of Inventory Purchasing.
Our end user customers may have separate agreements with our distributors that
require them to hold a certain level of inventory. Similarly, other customers have
historically purchased ahead of their utilization to insure growth within their
business, particularly for the processing of stem cells. Given the tightening of
credit and other financial constraints, including possible downturns in collection
and processing for cord blood, our customers could reduce the amount of inventory
levels our distributors hold, or which they hold internally in lieu of new
purchases. In addition, termination of distribution agreements may cause the sale of
product inventory by such distributors, which may result in a surplus of product
availability in the market. If these events were to occur, future sales of our
products could decline significantly, which would have a material adverse effect on
our financial performance in any future period where such events occur.
Failure to Meet Certain Financial or Delivery Metrics could Decrease our Future
Res-Q Revenues.
Under the BioParadox license and distribution agreement, if we fail to meet
certain financial or delivery requirements, the Company may have to place in escrow
the detailed instructions for manufacturing the products. BioParadox may
subsequently take possession of the escrowed intellectual property and initiate
manufacturing of the Res-Q technology for the preparation of platelet-rich plasma
for use in the cardiac field if we fail to meet certain supply or delivery metrics.
If this were to occur, our future revenues may be negatively impacted.
Page 18
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. [ Removed and Reserved].
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits:
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ThermoGenesis Corp. (1) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Revised Bylaws of ThermoGenesis Corp. (2) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of ThermoGenesis Corp. (3) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Stock Grant Agreement; Common Stock Agreement (4) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
License and Escrow Agreement between ThermoGenesis Corp. and CBR Systems, Inc.,
effective June 15, 2010 (5) |
|
|
|
10.2+
|
|
License and Distribution Agreement between ThermoGenesis Corp. and BioParadox
effective October 13, 2010 (6) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
International Distributor Agreement between ThermoGenesis Corp. and Nanshan
Memorial Medical Institute effective November 3, 2010 (4) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
2006 Equity Incentive Plan (7) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Distribution and License Agreement between ThermoGenesis Corp. and Asahi Kasei
Medical Co., Ltd., dated March 28, 2005 (8) |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Amended 1998 Employee Equity Incentive Plan (9) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
Footnotes to Exhibit Index |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to ThermoGenesis definitive proxy
statement for the Special Meeting of Stockholders held on December 5, 2005, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on October 31, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to ThermoGenesis Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended June 30, 1994. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to ThermoGenesis Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on August 26, 2010. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to ThermoGenesis Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on November 5, 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to ThermoGenesis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2010. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to ThermoGenesis Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on October 19, 2010. |
Page 19
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to ThermoGenesis definitive proxy
statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on December 11, 2006, filed with
the SEC on October 26, 2006. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to ThermoGenesis Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on March 31, 2005. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to ThermoGenesis definitive proxy
statement for the Special Meeting of Stockholders held on February 2, 1998, filed with
the SEC on December 8, 1997. |
|
+ |
|
The SEC has granted confidential treatment with respect to certain portions of
this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the SEC. |
Page 20
ThermoGenesis Corp.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThermoGenesis Corp. |
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 5, 2011
|
|
/s/ J. Melville Engle
J. Melville Engle
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 5, 2011
|
|
/s/ Matthew T. Plavan
Matthew T. Plavan
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer) |
|
|
Page 21