UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 1-6003

Federal Signal Corporation

(Exact name of Company as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		36-1063330 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1415 West 22nd Street
Oak Brook, IL 60523
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(630) 954-2000
(Company’s telephone number including area code)

Not applicable
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

     Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the Company has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer þ		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

     Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Company’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Title
Common Stock, $1.00 par value		62,183,827 shares outstanding at July 13, 2011

 

 

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

		Page
Part I. Financial Information			3
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)			3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010			4
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010			5
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011			6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010			7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			8
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			21
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			31
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			31
Part II. Other Information			32
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			32
Item 1A. Risk Factors			32
Item 5. Other Information			32
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments			32
Item 2. Restrictions upon the Payment of Dividends			32
Item 5. Other Information			32
Item 6. Exhibits			32
Signatures			33

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-Q, reports filed by Federal Signal Corporation and its subsidiaries (“the Company”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and comments made by management may contain words such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “estimate” and “objective” or the negative thereof or similar terminology concerning the Company’s future financial performance, business strategy, plans, goals and objectives. These expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include information concerning the Company’s possible or assumed future performance or results of operations and are not guarantees. While these statements are based on assumptions and judgments that management has made in light of industry experience as well as perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate under the circumstances, they are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different.

These risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, include the cyclical nature of our industrial, municipal, government and commercial markets; restrictive debt covenants; impairment of goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets; ability to use net operating loss (“NOL”) carryovers to reduce future tax payments; availability of credit and third-party financing for customers; technological advances by competitors; ability to expand into new geographic markets and to anticipate and meet customer demands for new products and product enhancements; domestic and foreign governmental policy change; changes in cost competitiveness including those resulting from foreign currency movements; increased competition and pricing pressures in the markets served; retention of key employees; volatility in securities trading markets; economic downturns; increased warranty and product liability expenses and client service interruption; ability to expand our business through acquisitions; ability to finance acquisitions or successfully integrate acquired companies; unknown liabilities assumed in connection with acquisitions; unforeseen developments in contingencies such as litigation; protection and validity of patent and other intellectual property rights; ability to achieve expected savings from integration, synergy and other cost-control initiatives; compliance with environmental and safety regulations; disruptions in the supply of parts or components from sole source suppliers and subcontractors; risks associated with suppliers, dealer and other partner alliances; disruptions within our dealer market; risks associated with work stoppages and other labor relations matters; restructuring and impairment charges as we continue to evaluate opportunities to restructure our business in an effort to optimize the cost structure; and general changes in the competitive environment. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk factors described under Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Form 10-Qs and other filings with the SEC. These factors may not constitute all factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in any forward-looking statement. We operate in a continually changing business environment and new factors emerge from time to time. We cannot predict such factors nor can we assess the impact, if any, of such factors on our financial position or results of operations. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a predictor of actual results. We disclaim any responsibility to update any forward-looking statement provided in this Form 10-Q.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The Company makes its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, other reports and information filed with the SEC and amendments to those reports available, free of charge, through its Internet website (http://www.federalsignal.com) as soon as reasonably practical after it electronically files or furnishes such materials to the SEC. All of the Company’s filings may be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)

		Three months ended June 30,								Six months ended June 30,
(in millions, except per share data)		2011				2010				2011				2010
Net sales		$	204.5			$	195.6			$	378.1			$	360.2
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales			152.8				144.4				284.9				268.7
Selling, engineering, general and administrative			42.8				43.9				87.1				82.8
Goodwill impairment			—				—				(1.6	)			—
Acquisition and integration related costs			—				1.1				—				3.7
Restructuring charges			—				3.7				—				4.0
Operating income			8.9				2.5				7.7				1.0
Interest expense			3.8				3.2				7.0				6.1
Other (income) expense, net			(0.2	)			0.5				—				1.4
Income (loss) before income taxes			5.3				(1.2	)			0.7				(6.5	)
Income tax benefit (expense)			0.4				0.7				(0.3	)			2.0
Income (loss) from continuing operations			5.7				(0.5	)			0.4				(4.5	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations and disposal, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $0.0, $1.0, ($0.1), and $1.2, respectively			0.3				(2.2	)			0.3				(3.2	)
Net income (loss)		$	6.0			$	(2.7	)		$	0.7			$	(7.7	)
COMMON STOCK DATA:
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$	0.09			$	(0.01	)		$	0.01			$	(0.09	)
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations and disposal			0.01				(0.04	)			—				(0.06	)
Earnings (loss) per share		$	0.10			$	(0.05	)		$	0.01			$	(0.15	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic			62.2				57.1				62.2				53.0
Diluted			62.2				57.2				62.2				53.1
Cash dividends per share of common stock		$	—			$	0.06			$	—			$	0.12

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)

		June 30,				December 31,
(in millions, except per share data)		2011				2010
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	14.3			$	62.1
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $3.5 million and $2.8 million, respectively			113.1				100.4
Inventories, net			123.5				119.6
Other current assets			19.0				17.9
Total current assets			269.9				300.0
Properties and equipment, net			63.6				63.2
Other assets
Goodwill			316.3				310.4
Intangible assets			83.1				84.4
Deferred charges and other assets			2.9				3.4
Total assets of continuing operations			735.8				761.4
Assets of discontinued operations, net			3.0				3.1
Total assets		$	738.8			$	764.5
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowings		$	9.5			$	1.8
Current portion of long-term borrowings and capital lease obligations			190.3				76.2
Accounts payable			58.0				53.5
Accrued liabilities
Compensation and withholding taxes			17.4				21.2
Customer deposits			11.0				10.2
Deferred revenue			11.1				12.4
Other			29.4				39.3
Total current liabilities			326.7				214.6
Long-term borrowings and capital lease obligations, less current portion			34.1				184.4
Long-term pension liabilities			40.0				41.3
Deferred gain			22.5				23.5
Deferred tax liabilities			50.9				45.8
Other long-term liabilities			16.0				15.8
Total liabilities of continuing operations			490.2				525.4
Liabilities of discontinued operations			14.3				18.2
Total liabilities			504.5				543.6
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, $1 par value per share, 90.0 million shares authorized, 63.1 million and 63.0 million shares issued, respectively			63.1				63.0
Capital in excess of par value			166.6				164.7
Retained earnings			51.3				50.6
Treasury stock, 0.9 million and 0.9 million shares, respectively, at cost			(16.1	)			(15.8	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(30.6	)			(41.6	)
Total shareholders’ equity			234.3				220.9
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	738.8			$	764.5

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)

		Common				Capital in												Accumulated
		Stock				Excess of												Other
		Par				Par				Retained				Treasury				Comprehensive
(in millions)		Value				Value				Earnings				Stock				Loss				Total
Balance at December 31, 2010		$	63.0			$	164.7			$	50.6			$	(15.8	)		$	(41.6	)		$	220.9
Comprehensive income:
Net income											0.7												0.7
Foreign currency translation																			10.0				10.0
Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of tax expense of $0.5																			0.1				0.1
Change in unrecognized loss related to pension benefit plans, net of tax expense of $1.4																			0.9				0.9
Comprehensive income																							11.7
Stock-based payments:
Non-vested stock and options							1.3																1.3
Stock awards			0.1				0.6								(0.3	)							0.4
Balance at June 30, 2011		$	63.1			$	166.6			$	51.3			$	(16.1	)		$	(30.6	)		$	234.3

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

		Six months ended
		June 30,
(in millions)		2011				2010
Operating activities
Net income (loss)		$	0.7			$	(7.7	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used for operating activities:
(Gain) loss on discontinued operations and disposal			(0.3	)			3.2
Depreciation and amortization			11.4				9.2
Stock-based compensation expense			1.3				2.2
Goodwill impairment			(1.6	)			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and dispositions of companies			(15.3	)			(13.1	)
Net cash used for continuing operating activities			(3.8	)			(6.2	)
Net cash used for discontinued operating activities			(1.7	)			(1.7	)
Net cash used for operating activities			(5.5	)			(7.9	)
Investing activities
Purchases of properties and equipment			(7.3	)			(6.5	)
Proceeds from sales of properties, plant and equipment			0.9				1.2
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired			—				(97.3	)
Net cash used for continuing investing activities			(6.4	)			(102.6	)
Net cash used for investing activities			(6.4	)			(102.6	)
Financing activities
(Reduction) increase in debt outstanding under revolving credit facilities			(24.6	)			61.1
Proceeds on short-term borrowings			33.0				7.6
Payments on short-term borrowings			(25.4	)			—
Payments on long-term borrowings			(11.4	)			(35.0	)
Payments of debt amendment fees			(2.1	)			—
Cash dividends paid to shareholders			(3.7	)			(6.7	)
Proceeds from equity offering, net of fees			—				71.0
Other, net			(0.2	)			0.3
Net cash (used for) provided by continuing financing activities			(34.4	)			98.3
Net cash used for discontinued financing activities			—				(0.4	)
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities			(34.4	)			97.9
Effects of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents			(1.5	)			4.7
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents			(47.8	)			(7.9	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			62.1				21.1
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	14.3			$	13.2

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and Description of the Business

Federal Signal Corporation was founded in 1901 and was reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1969. References herein to the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer collectively to Federal Signal Corporation and its subsidiaries.

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements represent the consolidation of Federal Signal Corporation and subsidiaries included herein and have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to ensure the information presented is not misleading. These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Company’s accounting policies described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.

These statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) that we considered necessary to present a fair statement of our results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The results reported in these condensed, consolidated financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We label our quarterly information using a calendar convention, that is, first quarter is labeled as ending on March 31, second quarter as ending on June 30, and third quarter as ending on September 30. It is our longstanding practice to establish interim quarterly closing dates using a 5-4-4 calendar with the fiscal year ending on December 31. The effects of this practice are modest and only exist within a reporting year.

We have reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation. Included with reclassifications are restatements for discontinued operations and adjustments related to the timing of recording revenue on certain arrangements primarily in the Federal Signal Technologies Group, as described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Accounting Changes

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13, Topic 605- Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which changes the level of evidence of standalone selling price required to separate deliverables in a multiple deliverable revenue arrangement by allowing a company to make its best estimate of the selling price of deliverables when more objective evidence of selling price is not available and eliminates the use of the residual method. ASU No. 2009-13 applies to multiple deliverable revenue arrangements that are not accounted for under other accounting pronouncements and retains the use of vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”) if available, and third-party evidence of selling price when VSOE is unavailable.

In October 2009, the FASB also issued ASU No. 2009-14, Topic 985- Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, which amended the accounting standards for revenue recognition to remove tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the products’ essential functionality from the scope of industry-specific software revenue recognition guidance.

The Company adopted ASU No. 2009-13 and ASU No. 2009-14 prospectively on January 1, 2011. The majority of the Company’s businesses generate revenue through the manufacture and sale of a broad range of specialized products and components, with revenue recognized upon transfer of title and risk of loss, which is generally upon shipment. Certain businesses within the Federal Signal

Technologies Group sell under multiple deliverable sales arrangements where the Company utilized estimated selling prices under the relative-selling-price method. In arriving at its best estimates of selling price, management considered market conditions as well as Company-specific factors. Management considered the Company’s overall pricing model and objectives, including profit objectives and internal cost structure, as well as historical pricing data. The effect of adopting the new accounting guidance during the first quarter of 2011 was an increase in revenues of $1.2 million and an increase in cost of sales of $0.6 million. The effect of adopting the new accounting guidance during the second quarter of 2011 was an increase in revenues of $2.1 million and an increase in cost of sales of $0.9 million. The total effect of adopting the new accounting guidance for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was an increase in revenues and cost of sales of $3.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively. The Company anticipates that the effect on future quarters of 2011 will be consistent with the effect on the first two quarters.

No other new accounting pronouncements issued or effective during the first six months of 2011 have had or are expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but are not limited to, pension and other postretirement benefits, allowance for doubtful accounts, income tax contingency accruals and valuation allowances, product warranty accruals, asset impairment, purchase price allocation and litigation-related accruals. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

2. ACQUISITIONS

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, pretax acquisition and integration related expenses totaling $1.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively, were recorded. During the first and second quarters of 2011, there were no charges recorded for acquisition and integration related costs. These charges, which were expensed in accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, were recorded in “Acquisition and integration related costs” on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and were reflected in the Corporate results.

3. INVENTORIES, NET

Inventories are summarized as follows:

		June 30,				December 31,
($ in millions)		2011				2010
Raw materials		$	55.4			$	55.0
Work in progress			34.8				29.0
Finished goods			33.3				35.6
Total inventories, net		$	123.5			$	119.6

4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

										Other
										Adjustments
Goodwill		December 31,								Including Currency				June 30,
($ in millions)		2010				Impairment				Translations				2011
Environmental Solutions		$	120.4			$	—			$	—			$	120.4
Fire Rescue			33.9				—				1.8				35.7
Safety and Security Systems			118.2				—				3.2				121.4
Federal Signal Technologies			37.9				1.6				(0.7	)			38.8
Total		$	310.4			$	1.6			$	4.3			$	316.3

										Other
										Adjustments
Trade names		December 31,								Including Currency				June 30,
($ in millions)		2010				Impairment				Translations				2011
Federal Signal Technologies		$	15.3			$	—			$	0.4			$	15.7
Total		$	15.3			$	—			$	0.4			$	15.7

The following table provides the gross carrying value and accumulated amortization for each major class of intangible assets:

						June 30, 2011												December 31, 2010
		Average				Gross								Net				Gross								Net
		Useful Life				Carrying				Accumulated				Carrying				Carrying				Accumulated				Carrying
($ in millions)		(Years)				Value				Amortization				Value				Value				Amortization				Value
Amortizable Intangible Assets:
Developed software			6			$	23.9			$	(18.4	)		$	5.5			$	23.0			$	(17.5	)		$	5.5
Patents			10				3.9				(1.0	)			2.9				2.3				(0.6	)			1.7
Customer relationships			15				45.7				(9.3	)			36.4				45.0				(7.3	)			37.7
Technology			11				23.9				(4.3	)			19.6				23.7				(3.1	)			20.6
Other			5				5.6				(2.6	)			3.0				5.7				(2.1	)			3.6
Total			12				103.0				(35.6	)			67.4				99.7				(30.6	)			69.1
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets:
Trade names							15.7				—				15.7				15.3				—				15.3
Total						$	118.7			$	(35.6	)		$	83.1			$	115.0			$	(30.6	)		$	84.4

Amortization expense for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2011 totaled $2.5 million and $4.9 million, respectively, and for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2010 totaled $2.2 million and $3.8 million, respectively. The Company estimates that the total amortization expense will be $9.3 million in 2011, $8.1 million in 2012, $7.3 million in 2013, $7.2 million in 2014, $6.6 million in 2015, $6.3 million in 2016, and $27.5 million thereafter.

The Company accounts for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets in accordance with ASC 360 “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other.” Under this standard, the Company assesses the impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually, on October 31, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.

During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company performed its annual assessment and determined that the goodwill and certain trade names within the Federal Signal Technologies Group reporting unit were impaired and recorded impairment charges of $67.1 million and $11.8 million, respectively. The impairment charges resulted from decreased sales and cash flow estimated in our Federal Signal Technologies Group. Upon completion of a detailed second step impairment analysis in the first quarter of 2011, the Company recorded an adjustment of $1.6 million which reduced a portion of the original goodwill impairment recognized during the fourth quarter of 2010.

5. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company manages the volatility of cash flows caused by fluctuations in currency rates by entering into foreign exchange forward contracts and options. These derivative instruments may be designated as cash flow hedges that hedge portions of the Company’s anticipated third-party purchases and forecasted sales denominated in foreign currencies. The Company also enters into foreign exchange contracts that are not intended to qualify for hedge accounting, but are intended to offset the effect on earnings of foreign currency movements on short and long term intercompany transactions. Gains and losses on these derivative instruments are recorded through earnings.

For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company uses an income approach to value the assets and liabilities for outstanding derivative contracts, which include interest rate swap and foreign currency forward contracts. The income approach consists of a discounted cash flow model that takes into account the present value of future cash flows under the terms of the contracts using current market information as of the reporting date, such as prevailing interest rates and foreign currency spot and forward rates. The following table provides a summary of the fair values of assets and liabilities:

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011

Quoted Prices

in Active

Significant

Markets for

Other

Significant

Identical

Observable Inputs

Unobservable Inputs

($ in millions)

Total

Assets (Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Assets

Derivatives

$

0.4

$

—

$

0.4

$

—

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011

Quoted Prices

in Active

Significant

Markets for

Other

Significant

Identical

Observable Inputs

Unobservable Inputs

Total

Assets (Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Liabilities

Derivatives

$

0.1

$

—

$

0.1

$

—

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010

Quoted Prices in

Active

Markets for

Significant Other

Significant

Identical

Observable Inputs

Unobservable Inputs

Total

Assets (Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Assets

Derivatives

$

—

$

—

$

—

$

—

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010

Quoted Prices in

Active

Markets for

Significant Other

Significant

Identical

Observable Inputs

Unobservable Inputs

Total

Assets (Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Liabilities

Derivatives

$

0.6

$

—

$

0.6

$

—

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments was recorded as follows:

Asset Derivatives

Liability Derivatives

June 30, 2011

June 30, 2011

Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet

($ in millions)

Location

Fair Value

Location

Fair Value

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

Foreign exchange

Other current assets

$

0.4

Other accrued liabilities

$

—

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments

0.4

—

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

Foreign exchange

Accounts receivable, net

—

Other accrued liabilities

0.1

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

—

0.1

Total derivatives

$

0.4

$

0.1

Asset Derivatives

Liability Derivatives

December 31, 2010

December 31, 2010

Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet

($ in millions)

Location

Fair Value

Location

Fair Value

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

Foreign exchange

Other current assets

—

Other current Liabilities

$

0.2

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments

—

0.2

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

Asset Derivatives

Liability Derivatives

December 31, 2010

December 31, 2010

Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet

($ in millions)

Location

Fair Value

Location

Fair Value

Foreign exchange

Accounts receivable, net

—

Other accrued liabilities

0.4

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

—

0.4

Total derivatives

$

—

$

0.6

The effect of derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows:

Location of

Amount of Gain

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

from Accumulated

Recognized in OCI on

Accumulated OCI into

OCI into

($ in millions)

Derivative

Income (Effective

Income (Effective

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

(Effective Portion)

Portion)

Portion)

Interest rate contracts

$

—

Interest expense

—

Foreign exchange

0.3

Net sales

—

Total

$

0.3

$

—

Derivatives Not		Location of Gain				Amount of Loss
Designated as		Recognized in				Recognized in
Hedging Instruments		Income on Derivative				Income on Derivative
Foreign exchange		Other expense				$	(0.2	)
Total						$	(0.2	)

The effect of derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows:

Location of

Amount of Gain

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

from Accumulated

($ in millions)

Recognized in OCI on

Accumulated OCI into

OCI into

Derivatives in Cash

Derivative

Income (Effective

Income (Effective

Flow Hedging Relationships

(Effective Portion)

Portion)

Portion)

Interest rate contracts

$

—

Interest expense

$

—

Foreign exchange

0.5

Net sales

0.1

Total

$

0.5

$

0.1

		Location of Gain				Amount of Loss
Derivatives Not Designated as		Recognized in				Recognized in
Hedging Instruments		Income on Derivative				Income on Derivative
Foreign exchange		Other expense				$	(0.8	)
Total						$	(0.8	)

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, accumulated other comprehensive gain associated with interest rate swaps and foreign exchange contracts qualifying for hedge accounting treatment was $0.2 million and $0.5 million, net of income tax effects, respectively. The Company expects $0.4 million of pre-tax net gain on cash flow hedges that are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of June 30, 2011 to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months as the respective hedged transactions affect earnings.

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments:

		June 30, 2011								December 31, 2010
		Notional				Fair				Notional				Fair
($ in millions)		Amount				Value				Amount				Value
Short-term debt		$	9.5			$	9.5			$	1.8			$	1.8
Long-term debt (1)			226.0				223.3				262.1				259.9
Foreign exchange (2)			21.7				0.4				28.3				(0.6	)

The carrying value of short-term debt approximates fair value due to its short maturity. The fair value of long-term debt is based on interest rates that are currently available to us for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

6. DEBT

Short-term borrowings consisted of the following:

		June 30,				December 31,
($ in millions)		2011				2010
Non-U.S. lines of credit		$	9.5			$	1.8

Long-term borrowings consisted of the following:

		June 30,				December 31,
($ in millions)		2011				2010
Revolving Credit Facility		$	190.0			$	214.6
Alternative Currency Facility (within Revolving Credit Facility)			—				4.0
13.53% Secured Private Placement note with annual installments of $10.0 million due 2011			—				1.3
13.34% Secured Private Placement note with annual installments of $7.1 million due 2011			—				0.6
11.98% Secured Private Placement note due 2012			28.6				31.9
Secured Private Placement note, floating rate (8.10% and 5.39% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively) due 2013			6.4				7.1
Subsidiary Loan Agreement			—				1.0
Capital Lease Obligations			0.8				1.0
			225.8				261.5
Unamortized balance of terminated fair value interest rate swaps			0.2				0.6
			226.0				262.1
Less current maturities, excluding financial services activities			(190.0	)			(75.8	)
Less current capital lease obligations			(0.3	)			(0.4	)
Less financial services activities — borrowings (included in discontinued operations)			(1.6	)			(1.5	)
Total long-term borrowings and capital lease obligations, net		$	34.1			$	184.4

The Company was in violation of its Interest Coverage Ratio covenant minimum requirement as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) and the Note Purchase Agreements for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010.

On March 15, 2011, the Company executed the Third Amendment and Waiver to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 25, 2007 among the Company, the bank lenders party thereto, and Bank of Montreal, as Agent (the “Third Amendment and Waiver”) with regard to the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). On the same date, the Company also executed the Second Global Amendment and Waiver to the Note Purchase Agreements (the “Second Global Amendment”) with the holders of its private placement notes (the “Notes”). Both the Third Amendment and Waiver and the Second Global Amendment included a permanent waiver of compliance with the Interest Coverage Ratio covenant for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010. Included in the terms of the Third Amendment and Waiver and the Second Global Amendment are the replacement of the Interest Coverage Ratio covenant with a minimum EBITDA covenant effective January 1, 2011, with the first required reporting period on April 2, 2011; an increase in pricing to the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility pricing grid; an increase in pricing for the outstanding Notes; mandatory prepayments from proceeds of asset sales; restrictions on use of excess cash flow; restrictions on dividend payments, share repurchases and other restricted payments; and a 50 basis points fee paid to the bank lenders and holders of the Notes upon execution of the Third Amendment and Waiver and the Second Global Amendment.

The new minimum EBITDA covenant is required to be tested quarterly as of the last day of the fiscal quarters ending April 2, 2011 and July 2, 2011, and monthly thereafter (commencing on August 6, 2011), in each case on a trailing twelve-month basis, except that EBITDA for the fiscal quarters ending April 2, 2011 and July 2, 2011, and the fiscal months of and including July through November of 2011, will be calculated using the Company’s year-to-date EBITDA through the test date.

Under the terms of the Third Amendment and Waiver, no share repurchases or other restricted payments will be permitted going forward except with the consent of the bank lenders and the noteholders. Certain restrictions are also placed on the Company’s ability to pay dividends subsequent to effective date of the Third Amendment and Waiver.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants contained in its debt agreements.

As required in the Third Amendment and Waiver and the Second Global Amendment, on March 15, 2011, the Company repaid $30.0 million that was applied to the amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility and the Notes on a pro rata basis (i.e, 85.8% for the bank lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility and 14.2% for the Notes).

The Third Amendment and Waiver permanently reduced the available commitments to the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility from $250.0 million to $240.0 million. The Company’s ability to obtain new advances is now limited to $18.0 million. Borrowings up to the first $18.0 million of new advances under the Revolving Credit Facility are senior in right of payment to the existing borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and outstanding debt under the Notes. The Company may repay and reborrow amounts up to $18.0 million of new advances. The Company may also repay amounts greater than $18.0 million under the Revolving Credit Facility and, subject to certain other provisions, the bank lenders will make available those commitments dollar for dollar under the Revolving Credit Facility to $240.0 million.

Borrowings under the facility pursuant to the Third Amendment and Waiver bear interest, at the Company’s option, at the Base Rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is 2.00% for Base Rate borrowings and 3.00% for LIBOR borrowings for the period January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011; 2.50% for Base Rate borrowings and 3.50% for LIBOR borrowings from July 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011; 2.75% for Base Rate borrowings and 3.75% for LIBOR borrowings from October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011; 3.00% for Base Rate borrowings and 4.00% for LIBOR borrowings from January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012; and 3.25% for Base Rate borrowings and 4.25% for LIBOR borrowings thereafter. The Third Amendment and Waiver requires a LIBOR floor of 1.50% beginning January 1, 2011. The six-month LIBOR borrowing option was removed. Interest on all loans is payable monthly. The default rate increase in interest rates is 300 basis points.

The Second Global Amendment required an increase in interest rates applicable to the Notes by the same amounts as the interest rate increases under the Revolving Credit Facility. Also, under the Second Global Amendment, the default rate increase in interest rates is 300 basis points. The Company also agreed to pay to each consenting Noteholder a consent fee equal to 0.50% of the outstanding principal amounts of the Notes.

The outstanding debt under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility and Notes will be prepaid on a pro rata basis in accordance with their pro rata percentages on a quarterly basis by an amount equal to the Excess Cash Flow for that quarter.

Excess Cash Flow is defined as EBITDA for the applicable quarter minus the sum of interest, scheduled principal payments, cash taxes, cash dividends and capital expenditures paid in accordance with the Revolving Credit Agreement for that quarter, plus after the second fiscal quarter of 2011, the aggregate amount that the Company’s working capital has decreased in the ordinary course during such period. The Excess Cash Flow pro rata payment against the Revolving Credit Facility outstanding debt will concurrently and permanently reduce the same amount of Revolving Credit Facility commitments. The commitments may be reinstated with approval from all bank lenders within the Revolving Credit Facility.

The Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a first-priority perfected security interest in substantially all of the domestic tangible and intangible assets of the Company and its domestic subsidiaries as the guarantors.

The amendments also contain certain covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to make voluntarily debt payments, acquisitions or dispositions without the lenders’ consent. In addition, certain limitations are placed on the Company’s capital expenditure levels in future years.

At June 30, 2011, $190.0 million was drawn under the Revolving Credit Facility, leaving available borrowings of $50.0 million that includes $28.8 million of capacity used for existing letters of credit.

At June 30, 2011, the debt outstanding under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility has been classified as current liability based on the April 2012 maturity date. It is the Company’s intention to refinance the debt under the Revolving Credit Facility into senior secured long-term notes combined with an asset-based lending facility before December 31, 2011.

At June 30, 2011, $9.5 million was drawn against the Company’s non-U.S. lines of credit, which provide for borrowings up to $18.9 million.

7. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

In May 2010, the Company issued 12.1 million common shares at a price of $6.25 per share for total gross proceeds of $75.5 million. After deducting direct fees, net proceeds to the Company totaled $71.0 million. Proceeds from the equity offering were used to pay down debt.

8. INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate for continuing operations was a benefit of 7.5% and a benefit of 58.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company’s effective tax rate for continuing operations was an expense of 42.9% and a benefit of 30.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 do not reflect any tax benefit on domestic losses as a result of the domestic valuation allowance which was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2010. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, a tax benefit on domestic losses of $2.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively was recorded. The tax benefit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily associated with $0.7 million of foreign income tax, and is partially offset by the release of tax reserves related to the resolution of a foreign tax audit of $0.4 million during the first quarter. The three month period ended June 30, 2011 had a favorable impact of $0.4 million due to a reduction of the valuation allowance needed for domestic deferred tax assets.

The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits were $3.8 million at January 1, 2011, of which $4.1 million are tax benefits that, if recognized, would reduce the annual effective tax rate. The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. Interest and penalties amounting to $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, are included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2011. The Company expects the unrecognized tax benefits to decrease by $0.3 million over the next twelve months. In the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $0.1 million, primarily due to the aforementioned foreign tax audit resolution net of an IRS audit adjustment agreed to during the quarter.

9. POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

The components of the Company’s net periodic pension expense for its defined benefit pension plans are summarized as follows:

		U.S. Benefit Plan																Non-U.S. Benefit Plan
		Three months ended								Six months ended								Three months ended								Six months ended
		June 30,								June 30,								June 30,								June 30,
($ in millions)		2011				2010				2011				2010				2011				2010				2011				2010
Service Cost		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	0.1			$	—
Interest cost			2.0				2.0				3.9				3.9				0.7				0.8				1.4			$	1.5
Expected return on plan assets			(1.9	)			(2.2	)			(3.8	)			(4.4	)			(0.8	)			(0.8	)			(1.6	)			(1.5	)
Amortization of actuarial loss			1.2				0.9				2.4				1.9				0.2				0.2				0.4				0.3
Net periodic pension expense		$	1.3			$	0.7			$	2.5			$	1.4			$	0.1			$	0.2			$	0.3			$	0.3

During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, no contribution was made to the U.S. defined benefit plan and a $0.6 million contribution was made to the non-U.S. defined benefit plan. During the comparable prior year period, no contribution to the U.S. defined benefit plan was made and the Company contributed $0.5 million to the non-U.S. defined benefit plan.

10. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Earnings (loss) per share — basic is computed by dividing income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Earnings (loss) per share — diluted reflects the potential dilution that could occur if options issued under stock-based compensation awards were exercised and converted into common stock. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, options to purchase 1.8 million and 1.6 million shares of the Company’s common stock had exercise prices that were greater than the average market price of those shares during the respective reporting periods. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, options to purchase 1.5 million and 1.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock had exercise prices that were greater than the average market price of those shares during the respective reporting periods. As a result, these shares are excluded from the earnings (loss) per share calculation as they are anti-dilutive.

The following is a computation of earnings (loss) per share — basic and diluted — for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

Computation of Earnings (Loss) per Common Share

		Three months ended								Six months ended
		June 30,								June 30,
($ in millions, except per share data)		2011				2010				2011				2010
Income (loss) from continuing operations		$	5.7			$	(0.5	)		$	0.4			$	(4.5	)
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations and disposal, net of tax			0.3				(2.2	)			0.3				(3.2	)
Net income (loss)		$	6.0			$	(2.7	)		$	0.7			$	(7.7	)
Average shares outstanding — basic			62.2				57.1				62.2				53.0
Dilutive effect of stock options and other			—				0.1				—				0.1
Diluted shares outstanding			62.2				57.2				62.2				53.1
Basic and diluted loss per share:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$	0.09			$	(0.01	)		$	0.01			$	(0.09	)
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations and disposal			0.01				(0.04	)			—				(0.06	)
Gain (loss) per share		$	0.10			$	(0.05	)		$	0.01			$	(0.15	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic			62.2				57.1				62.2				53.0
Diluted			62.2				57.2				62.2				53.1

11. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND WARRANTIES

Warranties

The Company issues product performance warranties to customers with the sale of its products. The specific terms and conditions of these warranties vary depending upon the product sold and country in which the Company conducts business, with warranty periods generally ranging from one to ten years. The Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under its basic limited warranty and records a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the sale of the related product is recognized. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of units under warranty from time to time, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims and costs per claim. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary.

Changes in the Company’s warranty liabilities in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

($ in millions)		2011				2010
Balance at December 31		$	5.7			$	6.2
Provisions to expense			4.4				3.8
Actual costs incurred			(4.1	)			(3.8	)
Balance at June 30		$	6.0			$	6.2

Environmental Liabilities

The Company retained an environmental consultant to conduct an environmental risk assessment at its Pearland, Texas facility. The facility, which was previously used by the Company’s discontinued Pauluhn business, manufactured marine, offshore and industrial lighting products. While the Company has not completed the risk assessment analysis, it appears probable the site will require remediation. As of June 30, 2011, $2.4 million of reserves related to the environmental remediation are included in Liabilities of discontinued operations on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company’s estimate may change in the near term as more information becomes available; however, the costs are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to various claims as well as other pending and possible legal actions for product liability and other damages, and other matters arising out of the conduct of the Company’s business. The Company believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of such claims and actions will not have an adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of such matters, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

The Company has been sued by firefighters seeking damages claiming that exposure to the Company’s sirens has impaired their hearing and that the sirens are therefore defective. There were 33 cases filed during the period 1999-2004, involving a total of 2,443 plaintiffs, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. Beginning in 2009, six additional cases were filed in Cook County, involving 299 Pennsylvania firefighter plaintiffs. The trial of the first 27 of these plaintiffs’ claims occurred in 2008, when a Cook County jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of the Company. An additional 40 firefighter plaintiffs were selected for trial in 2009. Plaintiffs’ counsel later moved to reduce the number of plaintiffs from 40 to 9. The trial for these nine plaintiffs concluded with a verdict returned against the Company and for the plaintiffs in varying amounts totaling $0.4 million. The Company is appealing this verdict. All trials previously scheduled in Cook County during 2009 and 2010 were stayed pending the result of this appeal. On April 18, 2011, the trial court lifted this stay and ordered that trials continue while the appeal is pending. Trials have been scheduled in Cook County for November 7, 2011, February 13, 2012, May 14, 2012, August 13, 2012, November 12, 2012, and February 14, 2013. A maximum of 10 plaintiffs have been selected for each trial.

The Company has also been sued on this issue outside of the Cook County, Illinois venue. Most of these cases have involved lawsuits filed by a single attorney in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. Since September 2007, this attorney filed a total of 71 lawsuits, involving 71 plaintiffs in this jurisdiction. Three of these cases were dismissed pursuant to pretrial motion filed by the Company. Another case was voluntarily dismissed. Prior to trial in four cases, the Company paid nominal sums, which included reimbursements of expenses, to obtain dismissals. Three trials occurred in Philadelphia involving these cases. The first trial involving one of these plaintiffs occurred in 2010, when the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. In particular, the jury found that the Company’s siren was not defectively designed, but that the Company negligently constructed the siren. The jury awarded damages in the amount of $0.1 million which was subsequently reduced to $0.08 million. The Company appealed this verdict. Another trial, involving 9 Philadelphia firefighter plaintiffs also occurred in 2010 when the jury returned a defense verdict for the Company as to all claims and all plaintiffs involved in that trial. The third trial, involving 9 Philadelphia firefighter plaintiffs, was completed during 2010 when the jury returned a defense verdict for the Company as to all claims and all plaintiffs involved in that trial.

Following defense verdicts in the last two Philadelphia trials, the Company negotiated settlements with respect to all remaining filed cases in Philadelphia as well as other firefighter claimants represented by the attorney who filed the Philadelphia cases. On January 4, 2011, the Company entered into a Global Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with the law firm of the attorney representing the Philadelphia claimants, on behalf of 1,125 claimants the firm represents (the “Claimants”) and who have asserted product claims against the Company (the “Claims”). Three hundred and eight of these claimants have lawsuits pending against the Company in Cook County, Illinois.

The Settlement Agreement as amended, provides that the Company shall pay (the “Settlement Payment”) a total amount of $3.8 million to settle the Claims (including the costs, fees and other expenses of the law firm in connection with its representation of the claimants), subject to certain terms, conditions and procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement. In order for the Company to be required to make the Settlement Payment: (i) each claimant who agrees to settle his or her claims must sign a release acceptable to the Company (a “Release”); (ii) each claimant who agrees to the settlement and who is a plaintiff in a lawsuit, must dismiss his or her lawsuit, with prejudice; (iii) by April 29, 2011, at least 93% of the claimants identified in Appendix A to the Settlement Agreement must have agreed to settle their claims and provide a signed Release to the Company; and (iv) the law firm shall have withdrawn from representing any claimants who do not agree to the settlement, including those who have filed lawsuits. If the conditions to the settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement are met, but less than 100% of the claimants have agreed to settle their Claims and sign a Release, the Settlement Payment will be reduced by the percentage of claimants who do not agree to the settlement.

On April 22, 2011, the Company confirmed that the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement had been met and made a payment of $3.6 million to conclude the settlement. The amount was based upon the Company’s receipt of 1,069 signed releases provided by claimants, which was 95.02% of all claimants identified in the Settlement Agreement.

The Company generally denies the allegations made in the claims and lawsuits and denies that its products caused any injuries to the claimants. Nonetheless, to avoid the expense and uncertainty of further litigation, the Company has entered into the Settlement Agreement for the purpose of minimizing its expenses, including legal fees, and the inconvenience and distraction of the claims and lawsuits.

Firefighters have brought hearing loss claims against the Company in jurisdictions other than Philadelphia and Cook County. Those cases, however, have also been dismissed, including four cases in the Supreme Court of Kings County, New York which were dismissed upon the Company’s motion in 2008. The trial court subsequently denied reconsideration of its ruling. On appeal, the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of these cases. Plaintiffs’ attorneys have threatened to file additional lawsuits. The Company intends to vigorously defend all of these lawsuits.

On July 29, 2011, a complaint for alleged patent infringements was filed in the U.S. District Court of Delaware by Neology, Inc. against the Company. The lawsuit demands that the Company cease manufacturing, marketing, importing or selling any devices that infringe on certain specified patents and also demands compensation for past alleged infringement. The Company is in the initial stages of investigating the complaint. The Company intends to vigorously defend all claims made under the complaint.

12. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company has four operating segments as defined under ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting.” Business units are organized under each segment because they share certain characteristics, such as technology, marketing, distribution and product application, which create long-term synergies. The principal activities of the Company’s operating segments are as follows:

Federal Signal Technologies — Our Federal Signal Technologies Group is a provider of technologies and solutions to the intelligent transportation systems and public safety markets and other applications. These products and solutions provide end users with the tools needed to automate data collection and analysis, transaction processing and asset tracking. Federal Signal Technologies provides technology platforms and services to customers in the areas of radio frequency identification systems, transaction processing vehicle classification, electronic toll collection, automated license plate recognition (“ALPR”), electronic vehicle registration, parking and access control, cashless payment solutions, congestion charging, traffic management, site security solutions and supply chain systems. Products are sold under the PIPS^tm, Idris^®, Sirit^tm and VESystems^tm brand names. Federal Signal Technologies operates manufacturing facilities in North America and Europe.

Safety and Security Systems — Our Safety and Security Systems Group is a leading manufacturer and supplier of comprehensive systems and products that law enforcement, fire rescue, emergency medical services, campuses, military facilities and industrial sites use to protect people and property. Offerings include systems for campus and community alerting, emergency vehicles, first responder interoperable communications, industrial communications and command and municipal networked security. Specific products include lightbars and sirens, public warning sirens and public safety software. Products are sold under the Federal Signal^TM, Federal Signal VAMA^TM, Target Tech^® and Victor^® brand names. The Group operates manufacturing facilities in North America, Europe, and South Africa.

Environmental Solutions — Our Environmental Solutions Group is a leading manufacturer and supplier of a full range of street sweeper and vacuum trucks and high-performance waterblasting equipment for municipal and industrial customers. We also manufacture products for the newer markets of hydro-excavation, glycol recovery and surface cleaning for utility and industrial customers. Products are sold under the Elgin^®, Vactor^®, Guzzler^® and Jetstream^® brand names. The Group primarily manufactures its vehicles and equipment in the United States.

Fire Rescue — Our Fire Rescue Group is a leading manufacturer and supplier of sophisticated, vehicle-mounted, aerial platforms for fire fighting, rescue, electric utility and industrial uses. End customers include fire departments, industrial fire services, electric

utilities, maintenance rental companies for applications such as fire fighting and rescue, transmission line maintenance, and installation and maintenance of wind turbines. The Group’s telescopic/articulated aerial platforms are designed in accordance with various regulatory codes and standards, such as European Norms, National Fire Protection Association and American National Standards Institute. In addition to equipment sales, the Group sells parts, service and training as part of a complete offering to its customer base. The Group manufactures in Finland and sells globally under the Bronto Skylift^® brand name.

Corporate contains those items that are not included in our other operating segments.

The Company evaluates performance based on operating income of the respective segment. Operating income includes all revenues, costs and expenses directly related to the segment involved, and excludes acquisition and integration related costs, corporate expenses and interest expenses. These costs are contained at Corporate. Operating segment depreciation expense, identifiable assets and capital expenditures relate to those assets that are utilized by the respective operating segment. Corporate assets consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, notes and other receivables and fixed assets. The accounting policies of each operating segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

We have reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation. Included with reclassifications are restatements for both discontinued operations and the reorganization of certain operating segments. Information regarding the Company’s discontinued operations is included in Note 15 — Discontinued Operations. The segment information included herein has been reclassified to reflect such discontinued operations.

The following table summarizes the Company’s net sales, operating income (loss), and total assets by segment. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Selected financial information is as follows:

		Safety
		and												Federal				Corporate
		Security				Fire				Environmental				Signal				and
($ in millions)		Systems				Rescue				Solutions				Technologies				Eliminations				Total
Three months ended June 30, 2011:
Net sales		$	56.3			$	24.7			$	94.6			$	28.9			$	—			$	204.5
Operating income (loss)			6.3				0.7				9.2				(1.5	)			(5.8	)			8.9
Three months ended June 30, 2010:
Net sales			56.8				29.6				84.5				24.7				—				195.6
Operating income (loss)			5.8				2.8				7.4				(3.4	)			(10.1	)			2.5

		Safety
		and																Corporate
		Security				Fire				Environmental				Federal Signal				and
($ in millions)		Systems				Rescue				Solutions				Technologies				Eliminations				Total
Six months ended June 30, 2011:
Net sales		$	109.0			$	45.9			$	171.0			$	52.2			$	—			$	378.1
Operating income (loss)			11.5				1.5				10.1				(5.0	)			(10.4	)			7.7
Six months ended June 30, 2010:
Net sales			108.9				54.4				154.5				42.4				—				360.2
Operating income (loss)			10.5				3.6				11.2				(6.0	)			(18.3	)			1.0

		Safety
		and												Federal				Corporate
		Security				Fire				Environmental				Signal				and
($ in millions)		Systems				Rescue				Solutions				Technologies				Eliminations				Total
As of June 30, 2011:
Total assets		$	253.0			$	122.1			$	235.0			$	103.5			$	25.2			$	738.8
As of December 31, 2010:
Total assets		$	247.2			$	123.2			$	241.8			$	104.9			$	47.4			$	764.5

13. RESTRUCTURING

During fiscal years 2010 and 2009, the Company announced restructuring initiatives. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the

Company’s total restructuring accrual was $0.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The Company continues to review its businesses for opportunities to reduce operating expenses and focus on executing its strategy based on core competencies and cost efficiencies.

2010 Plan

During the second quarter of 2010, the Company announced restructuring initiatives focused on aligning cost base with revenues and other functional reorganizations, and recorded $3.7 million in restructuring charges related to a global reduction in force across all functions. The total restructuring charge was $5.0 million as of December 31, 2010 and is expected to be completed by the third quarter of 2011.

2009 Plan

In July 2009, the Company began an initiative to consolidate a number of manufacturing and distribution operations into the Company’s University Park, Illinois plant, collectively known as the Footprint Restructuring Plan. The Company completed these actions as of December 31, 2010.

The following presents an analysis of the restructuring reserves included in other accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2011:

($ in millions)		Severance				Other				Total
Balance as of December 31, 2010		$	1.9			$	0.6			$	2.5
Cash payments			(1.7	)			(0.3	)			(2.0	)
Balance as of June 30, 2011		$	0.2			$	0.3			$	0.5

The following presents an analysis of the restructuring reserves included in other accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2010:

($ in millions)		Severance				Other				Total
Balance as of December 31, 2009		$	0.8			$	0.5			$	1.3
Restructuring charges			3.5				0.5				4.0
Cash payments			(0.6	)			(0.1	)			(0.7	)
Balance as of June 30, 2010		$	3.7			$	0.9			$	4.6

The following table shows the total amount of costs incurred by operating segment in connection with the restructuring programs:

		Three months ended								Six months ended
		June 30,								June 30,
($ in millions)		2011				2010				2011				2010
Environmental Solutions		$	—			$	0.2			$	—			$	0.2
Safety and Security			—				1.9				—				2.2
Fire Rescue			—				0.6				—				0.6
Federal Signal Technologies			—				0.4				—				0.4
Total restructuring charges by operating segment			—				3.1				—				3.4
Corporate			—				0.6				—				0.6
Total restructuring charges		$	—			$	3.7			$	—			$	4.0